My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7C, Planning Case 10-008 - Arden Plaza Master & Final PUD
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
06-14-10-R
>
7C, Planning Case 10-008 - Arden Plaza Master & Final PUD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:06:12 AM
Creation date
6/15/2010 8:25:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. <br />Chair Larson opened the floor to Commission questions. <br />Commissioner Holewa stated the City and Staff had spent a lot of time on developing the <br />design standards and vision for this area and recommending approval of this amendment would <br />be moving the City away from the approved vision for this area and building 3 might never be <br />built. <br />City Planner Beekman explained the building 3 would remain in the Master PUD as a potential <br />future development and this amendment would only remove it from being a requirement with <br />the construction of Phase I. Staff did not anticipate the amendment to create a negative impact <br />on the i�lmediate area, the overall vision for the B2 District, or the community as a whole. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated he was please to see the developer reacting to the current <br />economy. He stated it was favorable that this area would be landscaped at this time rather than <br />leave it empty or having an unoccupied building on the property. There was a possibility that <br />building 3 would be built in the future once the economy has improved and the demand for this <br />type of space has increased. <br />Commissioner Thompson agrees by approving this amendment the City runs the risk of <br />building 3 never being built but the green space in its place is appreciated. There is the <br />capacity for expansion in existing building 5 at this time for additional business and there <br />would not be a large vacant building on the property. She asked if the land ownership would <br />be the same and if the land would still be separated into three parcels. <br />City Planner Beekman explained the approved Preliminary Plat is still moving forward. The <br />first stage was Walgreens and they would purchase lot 1 and lot 3 would remain a separate lot <br />but would be maintained under the same ownership as building 5, which is Wellington <br />Management. If there is a tenant who would prefer to own the property then Wellington <br />Management does have the option to sell lot 3. <br />Cornmissioner Holewa asked if the parking lot would be constructed with Phase I and who <br />would retain the ownership and be responsible for the maintenance of the proposed green <br />space. <br />City Planner Beekman explained the only change to Phase I would be the exclusion of building <br />3 at this time. The parking lot would be completed with Phase I. The owner of the property for <br />building 3 would be Wellington Management unless it is sold to another party such as <br />Walgreens. The developer, Arden Plaza LLC, is paying to have the green space added and <br />Wellington Management, who would currently own it, would be responsible for the <br />maintenance of the property unless this property is sold. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.