My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-10-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
02-16-10-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 5:04:32 PM
Creation date
6/17/2010 8:50:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
2-16-10 Worksessoin Minutes
General - Type
2-16-10 Worksessoin Minutes
Date
2/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A—R-DEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—FEBRUARY 16, 2010 4 <br /> LA Planning Case #09-003, Zoning Code Amendment, Shoreland Regulation (continued) <br /> Mayor Harpstead questioned if this language could read, minus ten feet but no closer than the <br /> adjacent home. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the shoreland setback. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked why staff recommended the 10 feet clause. <br /> City Planner Beekman indicated this regulation could be followed by the majority with some <br /> flexibility. She explained that the City did not want to pass a code that created a great deal of <br /> variances. Topography was a concern on lakeshore lots and many are already non-conforming. <br /> g <br /> She stated the Council needed to address these non-conforming lots while still allowing the <br /> lakeshore properties to be improved. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated he would have a hard time supporting the Ordinance with the minus 10 <br /> foot clause unless it included other restrictions. He requested that any new structures not be closer <br /> to the lake than the adjacent lots. <br /> Councilmember Grant felt there was little threat of homes creeping towards the lake and none <br /> would be closer than 50 feet. - <br /> Councilmember Holmes agreed with this comment and noted she was in favor of the Ordinance <br /> as proposed by staff. <br /> Councilmember McClung agreed with Councilmember Grant as well and explained he was in <br /> favor of the lakeshore property owner's rights. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the issues surrounding the Northwestern College maintenance <br /> building would be addressed within the new ordinance. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated this would be covered under the Maintenance of the Shoreland <br /> section of the ordinance, requiring that all inoperable items could not be stored outdoors. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked for clarification between the ordinary high water mark and the shore <br /> impact zone. <br /> City Planner Beekman explained the shore impact zone was a new definition in the ordinance, <br /> meaning 50% of the minimum structure setback to the lake. The ordinary high water mark is an <br /> elevation established by the DNR. She further reviewed equipment and structures that were <br /> allowed within the shore impact zone. One accessory storage structure would be allowed within <br /> the shore impact zone. <br /> Mayor Harpstead questioned if tree topping was restricted within the shore impact zone. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated pruning and trimming was allowed, provided it doesn't kill the <br /> tree. Permits are not required for trimming. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.