2A, Arden Hall Concept Review - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

As part of the project, the applicants would complete a number of improvements to the building, including installation of a fire sprinkling system and elevator upgrades. Since the project would _ be owned by Northwestern College and hence be exempt from property taxes, the letter states that they would be willing to discuss payment to the City in lieu of property taxes. Mr. Davidson is also requesting a subdivision for the vacant area east of the existing building that is adjacent to Lexington Avenue and County Road E. This area is proposed to be retained for future redevelopment by the Davidson Companies, though there is currently no proposed use for the property. The purpose of this discussion is to provide feedback and questions to Mr. Davidson and Northwestern College on the concept as they prepare their formal application. A concept review does not bind the City or the applicant to any part of the discussion. However, it is important to provide clear and forthright feedback in order to have a productive conversation and guide the formal application. The Council is not being asked to vote or form a consensus on the request; however, it is acceptable to share points of view on the proposal. Review Considerations While a formal application has not been submitted, staff has provided Mr. Davidson with a number of thoughts, suggestions, and potential requirements. The following list is not all- inclusive and may change pending a formal submittal: • How long does Northwestern College anticipate using the space for a residence hall? • Will the number of students living at the building change? The current limit in the IUP is 350 students. • A concrete sidewalk along Lexington Avenue and County Road E will need to be completed in accordance with the Guiding Plan for the B2 District. • Regarding the proposed traffic signal in the Guiding Plan for the B2 District: o If the existing building remains, can the proposed traffic signal be accommodated? o A concept plan showing how the traffic signal can be accommodated with the existing building should be provided. o The properties which would benefit from the traffic light on the north side of County Road E should be expected to contribute up to 25 percent of the cost of the traffic signal in the development contract similar to the agreement with the Arden Plaza property. • Regarding the subdivision proposal: o What are the potential uses for the vacant parcel? o How will the eastern parcel be accessed since it does not have a curb cut? Would there be a cross easement for access across the Arden Hall property to the vacant property? Would Ramsey County or the City permit a new curb cut onto Lexington Avenue or County Road E? Would a curb cut interfere with existing access or the proposed traffic signal? Based on preliminary conversations, the County Engineer feels that access drives to the new parcel would not meet the County's minimum distance requirements from the County Road E and Lexington Avenue intersection. o How would traffic flow and on-site circulation be impacted? Page 2 of 4