My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-04-10-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2010
>
08-04-10-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:12:58 AM
Creation date
7/26/2010 3:19:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variances <br /> Variances are an exception to rules laid out in a zoning ordinance. They are permitted departures <br /> from strict e��forcement of the ordinance as-applied to a particular piece of property if strict <br /> cause the owner"undue hardship." Variances are generally for dimensional <br /> enforcement would P <br /> standards (such as setbacks or height limits) and may not be used to allow a use that is prohibited <br /> in the particular zoning district. Essentially, variances allow the landowner to break the <br /> dimensional rules that would otherwise apply. <br /> Undue hardshipis a legal standard set forth in Minn. <br /> Stat. § 462.357, sub. 6. Minnesota cities must apply More Information <br /> the state statutory standard when considering L.MCIT has answered cities' most <br /> PP <br /> a lications for variances. The statute provides that frequently asked questions related <br /> . <br /> requests for variances are heard by a body called the to. <br /> board of adjustment and appeals; in many smaller <br /> communities planning the lannin commission serves that Variances <br /> function. Generally, the board's decision is subject to 0 Land Use Nonconformities <br /> appeal to the city council. Under the statutory undue <br /> PP Conditional Use Permits <br /> hardship standard, a landowner is entitled to a <br /> variance if, and only if, the facts satisfy the three- <br /> factor test for undue hardship. <br /> c or is that the property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the <br /> The first undue hardship fat p p. Y <br /> variance. This factor means the landowner would like to use the property in a particular <br /> reasonable manner but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance, It does not mean the land <br /> cannot be an put to reasonable use whatsoever without the variance. <br /> P Y <br /> a <br /> The second undue hardship factor is that the landowner's plight is due to circumstances unique to <br /> the property not caused b the landowner. The uniqueness generally relates to the physical <br /> P P Y Y <br /> -characteristics of the particular piece of property;that is,to the land and not personal <br /> considerations <br /> of the landowner. The statute further notes that economic considerations alone <br /> cannot create an undue hardship._ <br /> factor is that the variance, if ranted, will not alter the essential character <br /> The third undue hardship fa g <br /> i This factor generally contemplates whether the resulting structure will be out of <br /> of the locality. g Y P <br /> scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. <br /> If the facts surrounding a variancepp Y <br /> application satisfy all three of the statutory factors, then the <br /> landowner is entitled to the variance. Whatever the ultimate decision on a particular variance <br /> application, city should carefully consider each of the three factors of the statutory undue <br /> PP , a Y <br /> hardship standard. While past practice may be instructive, it cannot replace the need for analysis <br /> ha p P <br /> of all three of the undue hardship factors. Cities should review their zoning ordinance for <br /> provisions relatingto variances to be sure they are consistent with the state statutory standard for <br /> undue hardship. <br /> issuing man variances to a articular standard,then the city may wish to <br /> If a city finds it is i g y P <br /> consider the possibility of amendingthe ordinance to change the standard. In other words, if a city <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.