My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-04-10-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2010
>
08-04-10-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:12:58 AM
Creation date
7/26/2010 3:19:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Code, similar to the Front Porch Ordinance, which would create circumstances where <br /> certain types of development could occur without the need for a variance. <br /> In the past, some communities would use the variance process as a way for cities to take a more <br /> hands on approach in the review and approval of projects. Based on the purpose of a variance, as _ <br /> defined in state law and interpreted by the courts, using the process as a tool to review Jro'ects <br /> p <br /> on a case by case basis as to whether the project is reasonable is no longer an appropriate use of <br /> that tool. Variances are designed to be used sparingly and only in those situations where a <br /> property can not be put to a reasonable use if it were forced to be developed in accordance with <br /> the existing ordinances of the city. <br /> As part of the work session discussion, Staff would like to include time to discuss the Planning <br /> Commission's opinion on incorporating changes to the Zoning Code that would allow certain <br /> types of development, which currently would require a variance, to be reviewed administratively. <br /> Y <br /> In Arden Hills, a common variance request is for a relatively small encroachment into a setback. <br /> Some cities already have provisions that allow this type of flexibility through an administrative <br /> review. For example, Burnsville's City Code (Attachment B) includes setback exemptions for <br /> residential properties for small additions to the front, side or rear of a home under certain <br /> circumstances. Other possible opportunities for changes may involve; detached garages in the <br /> Y g g <br /> front yards of lakeshore lots, garage additions of a single stall on existing single le or two stall <br /> garages, reduced side yard setback on corner lots, reduced setbacks for accessory structures in R- <br /> 2 and R-3 districts, or reduced front yard setbacks. <br /> Attachments <br /> A. League of Minnesota Cities, "Zoning Decisions",handout <br /> B. Section 10-12-5 of the City of Burnsville's Zoning Code <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.