Laserfiche WebLink
AIR-` HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JUNE 21, 2010 2 <br /> 2.A TCAAP Public Auction Process Update and Discussion (continued) <br /> Mr. Comodeca reviewed the email he received from Mr. Legare in detail with the Council. The <br /> GSA is proposing to have three successive closings on the property. The first closing will involve <br /> 200 acres in Fee Simple, restricted to Industrial. The first two hundred acres are about the <br /> southern one-third of the property. A condition listed within the email was an executed response <br /> action agreement, giving the purchaser 90 days to clean up the site, which the MPCA was <br /> reluctant to provide a pre-approved agreement. <br /> Community Development Director Lehnhoff stated the cleanup of the first 200 acres would <br /> take longer than 90 days, especially taking into consideration the City's zoning requirements. <br /> After speaking with Mr. Legare he informed him 12 to 18 months would be a more realistic <br /> timeline depending on the level of detail needed by the MPCA. He recommended the GSA speak <br /> with the MPCA to establish a more specific timeline. <br /> Mr. Comodeca explained the purchaser would be required to sign a response action agreement <br /> making them responsible for the remediation before the property can be transferred. He <br /> recommended the purchaser entering in an agreement with the EPA as well. <br /> Mayor Harpstead questioned if the Council could establish language for Thursday's meeting, <br /> that it would be the City's hope that the deed restrictions be lifted after a response action <br /> agreement has been completed that included full understanding of the contamination on the <br /> property and how it overlays with the potential uses and meshes with the City's zoning. If the <br /> City could make this general statement, the expectation could be set that more than 90 days would <br /> be needed for the remediation timeline. <br /> Community Development Director Lehnhoff expressed concern that an escrow account was not <br /> being required of the purchaser to assure that the remediation was complete on the entire parcel, <br /> and not just the first 200 acres. <br /> Mr. Comodeca stated he spoke with Carmen Netton regarding the financial assurance issues and <br /> the voluntary cleanup program does not require any financial assurances. The MPCA does not <br /> have any requirements, but the EPA would have to work through this issue with the Army. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated the yellow portion of the property, the first 200 acres, required <br /> much more of the cleanup effort than the remainder of the parcel. He questioned how a transfer <br /> would occur if core samples were worse than anticipated. <br /> Mr. Comodeca explained provisions would be written into the agreement but this would involve <br /> delays in who was responsible for the cleanup and for the funding of the cleanup. He indicated <br /> the City would want to have a process in the agreement, which was proposed during the <br /> negotiated sale. <br /> Councilmember McClung asked how the bidder's conference would proceed if the IFB language <br /> was not complete and little or no marketing efforts have taken place on the Army's behalf. He felt <br /> the whole process was just set up for failure. <br />