Laserfiche WebLink
Munic�pai Consen# <br />�iPDP / Scoping I Subject Guidar�c� <br />4. �f ci�y disapproves, 11�nID0� decid�s �hether io: <br />a. Mee# city's c�ndi#ior�{s), assuming �ity approved w�t� con�i#ions: <br />IU�nIDOT wr�tes ci� a�stt�r indicating t�is and a�taches revised layout with <br />change�sj. Th�s ��ds t#�e M� proc�ss. <br />b. Go #o the ap�ea� �rocess, <br />iUlr�/DOT <br />c. Stop �#�e project �do no� bui�d the �ro�ec�, or sca�e pro�ect down so tha# �un�cipa� <br />c�r�sent is no �onger req�ired). <br />5. �f in �he fnal �lan MniDflT a!#ers access, capacity or R/iN, Mn/DOT r�us# re-su�rnit <br />changed portion of plan for city's approva�. �The c�ty is �ot required to fioid ano�her <br />public �eari�g and has �0 days t� app�ove or ���approve), <br />City Apprt�val <br />The ci#y car� approve either by a fiormal approva� resol�#�or� �see generic reso�u#�on in <br />Appendix�, or by �fl# passing a resolution �isapprovin� the �ayout wi#h�n 90 days of ��e <br />�ub��� hear�ng. <br />�h� ci#�'s revie�v — vwith rega�ds #0 layout approval — is ���nited �o the pro�ec# e�em���s <br />in #he #�r�a� 1ay�ut that are vwith�n �he �oundaries of tha� �ity. A city cann�# ir�pose a <br />con�ition on its ap�roval tha# is �uts�de of #�e ci#�'s boun�iar�es. <br />�he �rocess allows the city �ne o�po�#un�ty #o exercise approval or disap�rova! of t�e <br />fi�nal layout �u��e�s Mn/DO� alters the pla� vvi�h �-ec�ards #o access, �a�aci�, or <br />r�ght-of-way�. Once a city ap�roves t�e layo�t, i# ca�no� resc�nd its approval later. !f a <br />c�ty disap�roves wi#h con�li#ions, and i� �l1nlDOT agrees to rneet those cond�ti�r�s — an� <br />noti�es the city in writing �inc�uding copy of �-evise� iayout) — then r�unic�paf consent <br />has been obtained. <br />Tl�e muni��paf consent stat�te applies #o cf��nges or� "a�y rflc�#e on #he trunk h�ghway <br />sys#e� �yir�g w�#hi� an� municipa��#y." If a T.H. borders a c�ty and no sec#ion o# t�e T.H. <br />�s completely wi#fiin �he city �imits, �unicipa� co�sent is sti1� req�ired for any of t�e <br />�esignated changes �ac��ss, capaci#y, o�- right-of-way� iha# do occur �vit�in il�a# city. <br />However, �� #he char�ges #riggering the mu�ic�pa� consen# process are on #he o#her s��e <br />of #he �".�. — a�d thus ou�side #�e ci#y's i�mits —#�en muni�cipai consen# is not re�u�red <br />from that city an�1 is not r�q�es#e� fro� #hat ci#y. <br />3of� <br />