Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -July 12, 2010 9 <br />8.A. Planning Case 10-008 -Arden Plaza Development Agreement Amendment 1Vo. 1 <br />(continued) <br />of their review, the City Council voted to table the application citing concerns over the removal of <br />Building 3 and the ramifications this may have on the overall design and site plan of the <br />development. While the applicant continues to work towards a solution that will accommodate <br />the requirements of the City and the needs of their future tenants, they have withdrawn their <br />request for the alternative development option to remove Building 3, and are focusing their <br />request on the timeline extensions only. Since the approval of the Master PUD in July 2009, the <br />developer has been in negotiations with Walgreen's. Given the delays of the project due to <br />market conditions and extended negotiations with Walgreen's, the applicants are requesting a one <br />year extension for filing the Final Plat with the County and for submitting for building permits for <br />each of the three phases. ~ According to the existing development agreement the deadline to pull <br />building permits for Phase I of the Arden Plaza redevelopment in July 13, 2010. If the deadline is <br />not extended, the development agreement will expire, essentially ending the proj ect. The one-year <br />extension will give the developer time to continue their negotiations with Walgreen's or another <br />user for the site. She clarified in order for this request to pass it would require at least a 3/2 vote. <br />Mayor Harpstead stated at the June 14, 2010, meeting the City Council had voted 311 to grant <br />the extensions. At that time it was deemed failed because it had not passed on a 4/5 vote. He <br />asked if the previous motion would then be considered approved. <br />City Planner Beekman stated City Attorney Filla did not reference the June 14, 2010, meeting in <br />his response about tonight's motion. City Attorney Filla had indicated that a 4/5 vote would be <br />required at the previous meeting but this may have been in regards to the other changes being <br />requested at that time related to the PUD amendment. He did indicate a 312 vote would be <br />required for this motion to pass tonight. <br />Councilmember McClung asked for clarification on if Arden Plaza was withdrawing their <br />request to alter the construction plans or if they were still postponing this portion of the request. <br />Mr. Dennis Trooien, VP of Arden Plaza, LLC, stated at this time they are requesting an <br />extension of time and they are continuing to work on the second portion of the request. <br />Community Development Director Lehnhoff stated the City has until August 2, 2010, to make <br />a determination on the construction plan request at this time, The City can request an extension <br />from Arden Plaza LLC for additional time. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if Arden Plaza would be willing to give the City the additional <br />time <br />Mr. Trooien stated they would agree to the extension. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion <br />to Approve Planning Case 10-008 for Amendment No. 1 of the Arden Plaza <br />Development Agreement Providing a One-Year extension for Submitting for <br />Building Permits for Each of the Three Phases Based on the Findings of Fact <br />