Laserfiche WebLink
i�larren E. Pete�son <br />�emrne P Filla <br />Dar�ie� �iliitt Ftam <br />Glenn A. Bergman <br />john �licfiael Mi�ler <br />tvt�chaet T. Oberle <br />Steven �i. Bruns" <br />Paul W Fahr�ing' <br />Sonja R. t3�#iz <br />Ben l. Rust <br />�onathan R. Cuskey <br />Tracy !. Halliday <br />)ared M. �oerli�z <br />�an N1. Duffek' <br />� � <br />� j, ! ! � <br />PROFESS�4�iAL ASSOCIATION <br />Suite 8�(i <br />55 East �ifth Streei <br />St. Pa�l, N��1 �5i01-!?l8 <br />�65 l � 29! -8955 <br />t6� � � 228- � �53 facsimi�e <br />www_pfb-pa.com <br />(GS 1 }290-b907 <br />A�gust Z5, 2� 1 fl <br />K.�is�i.�e �iga <br />�i�y Engineer <br />�it� of .�rde� Hilis <br />1 �4� �es� Highv�ay �b <br />Arden Hil�s, MI� S51 l� <br />R�: 2� 10 PI�P <br />Spec�al Ass�ssment �b�je�tions <br />. <br />r�s : <br />�fil�a(�pfb-�a. cc��n <br />VIA E-�iAIL <br />ihe cit� c�uncil �s re�u�r�d t� hear and �ith�� grant or ��n� proper�y �w�.er ����ct�ons <br />to the �ro�osed Special Asses��ne�.t L��� f�r the 2� �� P�VIP, Tl�e City's a��i�n shoul�i <br />be take� in��vi�ually on each parcel. �'he forrnat f�r �ie city c�uncil action should be <br />substan�ia��}� �irni�ar to �ie fallov�i�g: <br />1. Cit� council denies �i� o�jection fi�ed b� �ropert� ov�r�er A fQr the <br />followi�g reason(s): or <br />2. City council appr��es t�e objection f�ied by property owner � for the <br />follo�vi.ng reason(s} and am�nds the proposed Ass�ss�e�t IZoll by <br />str�g the prc�posed assessment ffl� parcel A or �y reducin.g t�ie <br />pr��osed ass�ss�nent �or parcel A �or�a $X to �� . � � <br />`�'he Cit� has received s�ven t�� vv�itten o�jections t� t�e �roposed special assessment <br />for the 2� 1 fl PMP. Six (�) of ti�� seven {7� objec�ions were r�ceiv�t� fro�n pro�r� <br />o�vners v�ho reside on a str�et tl�at wa� reconstruc�ed as part c�f tb.e 2�310 PMP. So far <br />as th�se objectians relate �o the amt�unt �f t�� pr��s�d special a�ssessm�nt, the City, vn <br />a si�nilar rec�nstr�cti�n project, rece�ved an o�it��� �rom �nn a���aiser indi�ati�.g that a <br />street reconstructi�n praject u�ill �cr�ase proper�y val�es fro�n �b,000 �� $9,0(�0. <br />�'he seven�h objection was recei�e� fram ��. and �1/irs .�hriszi�nsen v��� ��vned to <br />adjacent platted �o�s .�ne of the �ots is ia�dscaped �ut n�t ot��rv�rise unprov�d {Parcel <br />A�. The �t�.er lfl� �ias be�n i�proved with a resid�n��al dv�elling �Pa��l B�. �ir. and <br />•f1i.S0 r1DNS17'fED �N W15�ONSlN <br />