8A, Resolution 2010-039, Adopting Proposed Special Assessment Roll for the 2010 PMP

Home Browse Search

4. 4086 Valentine Crest Road, Brad and Lisa Madison The property owners object to the amount of the assessment, street width, and utility improvements. The owner also indicated they incurred plumbing costs as a result of the project. 5. 4075 Valentine Crest Road, Scott and Kathryn Scheunemann The property owners object to the amount of the assessment. 6. 4109 Valentine Crest Road, Kathleen Smith The property owner obj ects to the amount of the assessment, the interest rate, the assessment methodology as it relates to single family homes with multiple families living there, and the level of improvement on Valentine Crest Road compared to Valentine Court and Valentine Avenue. 7. 4112 Valentine Crest Road, Jeffre� and Gail Weber The property owners object to the assessment methodology, the amount of the assessment, property value, street width, and utility improvements. A- '�. Katie Lane �arcel�obiection 1 � The City Council asked staff to research what had been done on the 2003 PMP with a similar parcel. This parcel was owned by the Josephine Hills Lake Association, who requested that their assessment be reconsidered. The association believed that, while it was considered a buildable lot per City codes and ordinances, it was not a lot that would be built upon. The City Council voted to remove the parcel from the assessment roll. As stated by the City Attorney, options for the City Council include, but are not limited to, the following actions: ■ Assess two units at this time, making no change to the proposed assessment roll ■ Assess one unit at this time, and defer the second assessment. A future development of the property would trigger the payment of the deferred assessment. All deferred assessments must be paid within 30 years of the date of the adoption of the deferred assessment roll, even if development has not occurred. ■ Adopt a supplemental assessment roll when the subdivision of the property occurs. The City would need to follow all of the process that it does when it adopts a normal assessment roll but, only those people who would be receiving a supplemental assessment would need to be notified. ■ Forgive the second assessment. The City Attorney drafted an agreement which states that the assessment for the second lot will not be assessed at this time, but will be deferred and due in 15 years or prior to the issuance of any building permits, whichever occurs first. This agreement would be signed in place of adopting a deferred assessment roll or supplemental assessment roll. A copy of the agreement is attached. City Council Meeting \�1Vletro-inet\ardenhills�Admin\Council�Agendas & Packet Information�2410\8-30-10 Regular�I'acket Information\8A 8-30- l OMemo_201 OPMP_AdoptAssessment.doc Page 2 of 4