Laserfiche WebLink
Sin�le vs. multi-famil,y dwellings ,�objections 2 and 6�: <br />Staff looked into the concerns brought up by residents regarding multiple families living in <br />one home. These homes are classified as single family homes and do not meet the legal <br />definition of multi-family dwelling, therefore, there is no legal action City can take. The <br />properties are zoned R-1 single family, and have been assessed at one REU per property, <br />except as noted. <br />Desi�n-related concerns (objections 2, 4, 6 and 7�: <br />Valentine Crest Road was constructed as designed and shown on the plans, at 28 feet from <br />back of curb to back of curb. This, however, was a change from the feasibility report, where <br />the road width was proposed to be 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb. During final <br />design, this change was made to reduce impacts to residents' yards, to reduce the cost of the <br />project, and to reduce the amount of stormwater treatment needed to meet the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District's requirements for impervious surfaces. Additional parking restrictions <br />are not proposed as a part of this project; the existing parking restrictions will remain in <br />place. <br />The utilities were reviewed during feasibility and final design, and improvements were made <br />where needed. The sanitary sewer was replaced in its entirety on Valentine Court and several <br />sections of Valentine Avenue from manhole to manhole. Sections of the sanitary sewer were <br />replaced on Valentine Crest Road, where sags had been identified. Other sections of <br />Valentine Crest Road have been identified as a future sanitary sewer-lining project. Only a <br />portion of the watermain in the neighborhood was replaced. Watermain improvements on <br />Valentine Crest Road consisted of gate valve and hydrant replacements. <br />�ne property owner indicated that they incurred plumbing expenses as a result of the project. <br />Staff has contacted the property owner and informed them that they may submit their claim if <br />they would like it to be addressed. <br />Schedule <br />The following is a proposed schedule for 2010 assessments: <br />August 30 Council adopts assessment roll <br />August 31 to <br />September 29 Assessment pre-payment period at Arden Hills City Hall (30 days) <br />October 31 Certification of final assessment roll to Ramsey County <br />Council Action Requested <br />Approval of Resolution 2010-039, adopting and confirming assessments for the 2010 PMP <br />improvements. <br />City Council Meeting <br />\�1Vletro-inet\ardenhills�Admin\Council\Agendas & Packet Information�2010\8-30-10 Regular�Packet Information\8A 8-30- <br />10Memo_2010PMP_AdoptAssessment.doc <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />