08-16-10-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—AUGUST 16. 2010 8 2.B 2011 Budget/CIP (continued) Councilmember Holden questioned if funds were set aside in the 2011 budget for the B2 district.She requested staff time be set aside to work further on this district. Finance Director Iverson stated this would be explained within the CIP. She explained $60,000 was set aside for professional services in planning for the B2 district and TCAAP and other projects as needed. Councilmember Grant asked if the City has received additional comments regarding the utility bills and the senior discount. He stated he has heard many comments. Finance Director Iverson noted the phase-out plan would be completed in 2011, as it was athree year plan. Councilmember McClung questioned if additional funds would be added to planning for the Red Fox/Gray Fox area. City Planner Beekman stated $60,000 was aside in Professionals Services in Planning and Zoning for that type of work. The Red Fox/Gray Fox planning study could be completed in 2011. Councilmember Holden expressed concern about the Council completing additional studies when nothing comes from them and stated that she wanted more work done on the B2 district. Mayor Harpstead indicated the Holiday Inn could be a catalyst to this redevelopment, while on the other end the bridge could get the area going. At this time, the funding for the County Road E Bridge fell through. The next best opportunity would be the 2015 build-out of the bridge. City Administrator Klaers suggested the Council discuss this further and decide the commitment level to this district as it could not be completed without financial assistance. Councilmember McClung indicated the County should be approached to see if they would be interested in advance constructing the bridge. City Administrator Klaers noted something not in the budget that should be considered was Administrative Traffic Fines. This program was going well for Ramsey County. He reviewed the revenues collected by neighboring communities and stated the additional revenues collected from this program would flow into the City's general fund. Mayor Harpstead stated he was not opposed to moving forward with this program. Councilmember Holmes suggested this be discussed further at a future work session meeting. Councilmember McClung agreed that this item needed further discussion before putting it into the budget. He did not want to see the City proceed with this program as a revenue generator, but instead as a way to further promote public safety. The Council agreed to discuss this further at a work session before making a decision.