Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 2 <br />Greg Madsen explained that the school district wanted to advise the Council that they will be <br />seeking renewal of a no -tax increase levy. He then reviewed several facts about the success of <br />the Mounds View school district: high performing, residents care deeply about the quality of the <br />schools, above average ACT scores for Mounds View students, Irondale and Mounds View have <br />been named by Newsweek in the top 5% of the schools in the nation, and district students <br />perform one to three grade levels above national norms on standardized tests. <br />Mr. Madsen further stated that a community survey was conducted in the spring and 83% of the <br />community residents believe the quality of Mounds View Schools education is excellent l good; <br />85% believe they receive a good value from their investment; 80% would be proud to <br />recommend the Mounds View schools to others. <br />Mr. Madsen stated the $6 million expiring levy was approved in 2003 and makes up 5% of the <br />total operating budget. He reviewed the decline in state funding to schools pointing out that in <br />2007 Minnesota spent 1.3% less than the national average per pupil. In 1995, Minnesota ranked <br />15 in school spending. In 2007, Minnesota had dropped to 42 in the nation. <br />Mr. Tynjala referred to the community survey and explained that 87% of residents believe the <br />budget problems are likely to get worse in the next few years. The school district has made the <br />following reductions since the 2003 levy: closed two schools, cut 160 teachers at a savings of <br />$7.1 million, and cut 33 staff members at a savings of $3.1 million. Additional cost saving <br />measures include: the refund of long -term debt for interest savings of $4.5 million, $800,000 <br />savings in energy expenses, and an increase in user fees such as facility rentals and bus fees. <br />Mr. Tynjala reviewed additional costs containing measures such as budget reductions, <br />controlling administrative costs, and settling labor contracts in mid market. He explained the <br />2003 levy will expire in 2011 at which time the schools will stop receiving about $6 million a <br />year. The school board decided to ask voters to renew this levy with no increase in taxes. The <br />impact of the 2003 levy was $76 for every $100,000 of taxable market value annually and in <br />2010 it will be $70 for every $100,000 of taxable market valuable annually. He stated that 90% <br />of the school districts in the state have voter approved levies and rely on those levies for crucial <br />funding. He explained that a successful levy will maintain class sizes and programs, does not <br />provide extras, and will not prevent future reductions as funding conditions are unpredictable. <br />Councilmember Grant commented that he does hear negative comments from residents <br />regarding the bus fees. <br />Superintendent Hoverman explained that the bus fees do not cover the entire transportation <br />cost. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned what percentage of their budget is for salaries. <br />Superintendent Hoverman replied that 80% goes to salaries. <br />