Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 6 <br />residents from congestion on the County road system. He added that it is his impression that the <br />County is OK with the current proposal. <br />Mayor Harpstead pointed out that a recent admin update referred to the Sheriff's concern about <br />losing access to I694 and asked if that concern has been shared. <br />Public Works Director Terry Maurer responded that issue was not raised by the county at the <br />meeting. <br />Councilmember Holden asked about pedestrian movement. <br />Public Works Director Terry Maurer explained that Chris Chromy suggested a task force be <br />created to look at the pedestrian traffic issue. If the Council chooses to deny Mn/DOT's <br />proposal with conditions, the task force could be one of those conditions. <br />Mayor Harpstead referred to the pedestrian movement comment in Mn/DOT's letter which <br />states they're allowing additional width for that. <br />Councilmember Holmes asked if the State had ever explained why they can't keep the Hamline <br />exit open. <br />Mayor Harpstead responded that the State proposal would require two loops for Hwy 10 and <br />1694 and that would impact the current Hamline ramps. He then commented that in Mn/DOT's <br />2030 Plan they talked about closing County Road H and taking some access away at Hwy 96 and <br />Hwy 10. That would result in the loss of access to neighborhoods north of Hwy 96. <br />Public Works Director Terry Maurer stated that if the City simply denies the municipal <br />consent they would be on record as denying a project that is being proposed to address safety and <br />congestion concerns. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the Council had previously passed two resolutions regarding this <br />issue. <br />Councilmember McClung stated that he sees three basic issues: access for residents north of <br />1694; noise abatement throughout the corridor; and pedestrian movement. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the resolutions included those issues. <br />Councilmember Grant stated he doesn't think costs should come back to the City. But the City <br />will have to have some investment in the pedestrian movement areas. He isn't comfortable with <br />the City having to widen roads to accommodate changes in traffic resulting from the Mn/DOT <br />project. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated Mn/DOT will follow current policy for the noise wall. <br />They follow a very specific calculation to determine how much of the cost they will absorb. He <br />