My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4B, CP Rail Payment #3
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
11-29-10-R
>
4B, CP Rail Payment #3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2010 3:20:11 PM
Creation date
11/29/2010 3:15:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
CP Rail Payment #3
General - Type
CP Rail Payment #3
Category
CP Rail Payment #3
Date
11/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOLTON 8i- NA 1 N <br />Consulting Engineers Surveyors <br />Date: October 19, 2010 <br />To: Terry Maurer, P.E., Public Works Director <br />Kristine Giga, P.E., Civil Engineer <br />Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager <br />From: Travis Winter, P.E., LEED® AP <br />Subject: CP Rail Bridge Trail <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Project No.: T16.100325 <br />review and authorization. <br />12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337 <br />Phone (952) 890 -0509 Fax (952) 890-8065 <br />www.bolton- menk.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />During the capacity testing of the helical pile anchors installed as a part of the retaining wall for the CP <br />Rail Bridge Trail Crossing Project, the contractor discovered that six of the eight anchors in the upper row <br />did not meet the capacity requirements of the design. These six anchors held approximately half of the <br />planned working load. To remedy this issue, the contractor submitted a revised design that called for the <br />installation of an additional six helical pile anchors. The revised design information along with field <br />installation logs for the original 16 anchors was submitted to Bolton Menk and LHB Corporation for <br />The field logs from the anchor installations indicate that the upper row of anchors hit obstructions that <br />prevented them from being installed to the planned depth of 50' The contractors anchor design set the <br />depth of the anchors based on the soils information that was available. It relied on the anchors advancing <br />into a layer of stiff clay till in order to develop high enough installation torque values which would <br />translate into adequate bearing capacity. The obstructions that were encountered could not have been <br />foreseen based on the soils information that was available. <br />It is our opinion that the Contractor's original design was adequate, consisting of reasonable anchor <br />depths and substantial anchor size. This design would have met the requirements if the anchors had been <br />installed without obstruction. <br />We concur that installation of the additional anchors is necessary to meet the needed 50 -kip working load. <br />This loading was computed to restrain the bridge abutment and protect the existing bridge structure. It <br />was developed using what would be considered a standard factor of safety for public works projects and <br />is consistent with Mn/DOT design practices. <br />Due to this change in conditions the Contractor is eligible for additional compensation for the work to <br />complete the project. We have worked with the contractor and were successful in negotiating a price <br />reduction from what the work would have cost at the contract price for each of the additional anchors. <br />F:\ Civil\ ARDH\ T16100325 \Corres \memo_101910.doc <br />DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW <br />Bolton Menk is an equal opportunity employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.