Laserfiche WebLink
EN HILLS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: November 29, 2010 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br />FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />SUBJECT: Staff Updates <br />Background <br />1. Facility Fee discussion PTRC <br />2. TIF Development District map <br />3. 2011 PMP auto cad services <br />4. Public Works union contract requests <br />5. City Council meeting schedule and agendas <br />6. Library <br />As time allows, I would like to verbally update the City Council on a number of current <br />activities. The list of update items includes the following: <br />1. Parks and Recreation Manager Michelle Olsen will be at this meeting to discuss with the <br />Council the conversation that took place at the last PTRC meeting regarding fees to <br />Youth Associations for field usage. This issue was noted in the last Admin Update. <br />Attached is the Facility Fees chart that was also in the last Admin Update and a memo <br />from Michelle on this topic. <br />2. At the last Council meeting on November 15 the meeting was running late and I didn't <br />really have time to fully explain the TIF Development District map situation. Per <br />conversations and emails with Stacie Kvilvang, the Development District is just <br />identifying the area in which the City can expend TIF dollars. Placing the entire City in <br />the Development District provides the City with the maximum flexibility in deciding <br />where to best use available TIF funds. Areas excluded from a City-wide Development <br />District map typically are done along lines of demarcation that are easily understood (i.e. <br />roadways) and to exclude AHATS would require a legal description. Staff would have a <br />challenge from a timing point of view and the City from a cost point of view in putting <br />together the legal description for excluding some or all of the AHATS property from the <br />Development District. As noted last meeting, the Development District map needs to be <br />changed as it currently excludes the Presbyterian Homes site. The current Development <br />