My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-10-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
10-11-10-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 12:09:09 AM
Creation date
12/8/2010 3:08:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Worksession Minutes
General - Type
Worksession Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 11, 2010 7 <br /> 2.A Mn/DOT I-6941mprovement Project—Municipal Consent Discussion (continued) <br /> Councilmember McClung requested the Council be able to review Mn/DOT's model and <br /> provide comment before giving Consent. <br /> Public Works Director Maurer stated staff would make this request and tighten up the language <br /> in Condition 2, stating Mn/DOT shall provide the City with a working model showing no impact <br /> beyond the Interstate to the surrounding local streets. <br /> Mayor Harpstead suggested "no impact" be removed and replaced with other areas have <br /> improved or benefitted from the change. This would assure that Mn/DOT was building excess <br /> capacity into the interchange. <br /> The Council was in favor of Condition 4 and S as stated. <br /> Mayor Harpstead requested staff review the number of cars on Lexington Avenue as stated <br /> within the traffic study. He felt the number should be much higher. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked that Condition 7 be required and not just proposed and that the <br /> bridge specifications be further clarified. The Council agreed. <br /> Mayor Harpstead suggested Condition 8 add the term"non-motorized". The Council agreed. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated that Condition 9 was added to address a new pedestrian bridge that has <br /> been discussed at previous meetings. <br /> Councilmember Grant was in favor of this additional condition. <br /> The Council was in favor of Condition 10 as stated. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked for any further comments. <br /> Councilmember Holdcn requested County Road E be discussed further. <br /> Mayor Harpstead questioned if the Council had considered the aesthetics of the new bridges. <br /> Councilmember Grant suggested staff find the document signed by the Council five years ago <br /> with Mn/DOT regarding the look and feel of the bridges. This information should be reviewed <br /> prior to Consent. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked for comments from the audience. There were no comments at this time. <br /> City Administrator Klaers indicated staff would revise the document and the Council could <br /> 18t�'provide further comment at the October work session meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.