HomeMy WebLinkAbout3C, Grants for parks, trails, and recreation and overal regiona�
EN H�I.LS
Request for Counci� Review
Prepaced By: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Work Session Date: March 21, 2011
Manager
Grants for parks, �raiIs a�d recrcation and overall regional trail ana�ysas
Discuss�on Topic:
Discuss }�riorities regarding grant opportunities in xegaxds to parks, trails and recreation. In
additian, discuss the importance of an overall regional trai� analysis.
Supportin� Docaments:
l. Memorandum dated 03/21/11 from Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager
2. TraiI Segment Priority Listing
3. TraiI Segznent Map
.���
�i.R'�:. HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 21, 2011
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Patrick Klaers, City Administrator
Parks Trails and Recreation Committee Chairman and Committee Members
FROM: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Grants for parks, trails and recreation and overall regional trail
analysis
Back�round
Since the 2002 Parks and Open Space Plan was developed, the PTRC has maintained a list
of potential trail segments for development. This list has gone through updates with the
2006 Vision and Strategies and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The PTRC annually
reviews these priorities as trails are completed and needs for potential trails possibly
change. The PTRC has refrained from recommending segments in a highest to lowest
format and have historically identified the higher priorities within the Capital Improvement
Program (CIl'). However, in 2010, the committee categorized segments into highest to
lowest priority. The segments are not listed in any particular order in each category. This
trail segment priority listing is included for Council review, including a trail segment map.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan also identified various park improvements that are reviewed
each year during the CIP discussions. As with trails, these improvements are suggestions
that change with varying needs and situations. The PTRC would like to discuss priorities
for parks, trails and recreation in regards to potential grant or donation opportunities. In
addition, the PTRC would like to discuss the importance of the City working with
surrounding Cities, Ramsey County and Mn/DOT on an overall regional trail analysis.
Requested Action
Discuss priorities regarding grant opportunities in regards to parks, trails and recreation.
In addition, discuss the importance of an overall regional trail analysis.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PR&PW\Parks\Memos\Council Memos\032111 PTRC Grants for parks trails and recreation and regional
analysis. doc
Proposed Trails
Priority Listings
�
a
Seyment Trail Location Length Length
Feet Miles
HIGH PRIORITY
G County Road E(Indian PI. to Lk. Joh. Blvd. to Tony Schmidt U. Trail to end of park - north side) 2787.15 0.53
G.1 Lake Johanna Blvd. (From Segment G to Old 10 - Snelling) 1,742.40 0.33
� Lexington Ave. (From County Road F to Grey Fox Road) 3,947.�� �.75
H County Road E(Old 10-Snelling to Connelly Ave.) 2,184.84 0.41
� Snelling Ave. (Highway 51 to County Road E) 4,382.40 �.83
�. � Old Highway 10-Snelling (Cty Road E2 through CP Rail) �,056.00 �.2�
�.2 Old Highway 10-Snelling (from CP Rail to County Rd. E2) 2,27�.0� 0.43
�.3 Old Highway 10-Snelling (from Cty. Road E2 to Hwy. 96) 8,87�.�� 1.68
i�2 Round Lake Trail (Complete the loop that has a gap behind Deluxe Corp.) 2,421.31 0.46
M North Snelling Ave. (From County Road 96 to Briarknoll) 2, 826.82 0.54
� County Road 96 (Complete trail west from existing path to 35W) 3,941.46 �.%5
MEDIUM PRIORITY
� Lake Valentine Road (Mounds View H.S. to Old 10-Snelling) 2,258.40 0.43
Q Highway 51 (From Old Hwy. 10/Snelling to just past Glenhill Rd) �, 3�2. $� �.26
N County Road F(From Existing Sidewalk from Lexington to Hamline) 2,004.55 �.3$
E.1 R.C. Open Space (from segment E path to MVHS) 2,974.00 0.56
LOW PRIORITY
A Cleveland Ave. (County Road "D^ to Stowe Ave.) 2,623.31 0.5
A.2 Cleveland Ave. (Thom Ct. to existing path off Cty E2) 1,671.90 0.32
B County Road D(Cleveland to New Brighton Road) 2,644.36 �.5
C New Brighton Road (County Rd. D to Stowe Ave.) 2,956.80 0.56
C. � New Brighton Road (Stowe Ave. to County Road E2) 5, 332.80 1.01
D.1 County Road E2 (Cleveland Ave. to New Brighton Rd.) 670.91 0.13
i� Parkshore Dr. (from Old Hwy 10-Snelling to beginning of Rd. Lake Trail) 2, 395.21 0.45
K1 Gateway Blvd. (from proposed segment K to Round Lk Road) 2, 164.80 0.41
K3 Round Lake Road W. (from Gateway Blvd. to existing trail off of 96) 2,633.74 �.5
P Crepeau Preserve (From Cannon to Crepeau Nature Preserve) 838.19 0.16
P. � Pine Tree Drive(From Cty Road E to existing grass trail into Crepeau) �,266.21 �.24
N.1 Hamline (From County Road F to Floral Drive 604.50 0.11
0. � Lexington Ave. (From County Road E to Shoreline Lane) 5,211.70 0.99
�.2 Lexington Ave. (From Tanglewood to County Road I- West Side) 7,889.60 1.50
fZ County Road E-(From Lexington Trail to existing Concrete Sidewalk) 528. �� �. �
Total Future Trails 84,471.16 16.02
Recommendation is for restriping, not creation of
new path.
Last updated: March, 2010
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
_
�
a
0
�
�
U
GkEVA4"NTINEn,.
� MJ7ERS7ATE 6B�
✓4NETCT
VALENTINE
�5.,� 1.3
Arden H i i Is Pathway LEGEND:
/�/ City, Asphalt ^� Private, Asphalt �
City, Concrete �� private, Concrete N
� City, Turf ,� private, Turf
oa� so�,�e=a�d �o��a�n.
�RTiFN II,I,S �a,m„r�o��„�,sea,aMa,n�,�<„o, ����� County, Asphalt ^� City Proposed Pathway
'�i �,yo,q„a�„;,,� 0 350 700 10501400 Feet
� o� E g Ing D �� ;�.,,: County, Concrete �h�i County Proposed Pathway
prepared bv�
'���iv o! Roseville Engmeenng D�c �n.rr•,� �, ._.., .. ,�: COUfity, TUff �� f �OpOSBd Tf811 S@gl'Tl@f11S & ��# ymxd
vovember29 20�C „ , ,,,, _ , ._�. D ma�pnmenH�ilsP�emway-pdr
.,E�E,,,o.,..,.,
�a
g �.w
�e 4
_ g °pNrf1
, s +� 10
� %'
�'7 F �r�1.,�.
� �� .�t'��.., �
� ,�ooa,or..,.� L
� ------�I--�
� �r����� � �TS FOAD98 W �
�
�
• � � �'ny�
+an�srNe
K.1