HomeMy WebLinkAbout7A, 2011 Operating Levy Payable 2012 and 2011 Truth-In-Taxation�
EN HILLS
Request for Counc�� Action
Prepared By: Sue rversan, Director of Finance Council Meeting Date: September 12, 20ll
and Adrninistrative Services
2Q11 Operafing Levy Payable 2012 and 20ll Truth-In-Taxation Hearing Date
B�dgeted Amount: Act�al Amount: Funding Sourc�:
NIA N/A N/A
Reco�mendafion•
1. A motion to adopt Resolution 2011-045, a resolutian setting the preliminary �evy for
taxes payable in 2012 in the amount of $3,132,264.
2. A motion to adopi Resolution 2011-046, a resolution adopting Truth-in-Taxa#ion hearing
dates for proposed iaxes payable in 2012. The date establishc� is December �, 2011.
Supportin� Documents:
1. Memorandum dated September 12, 2011 from Sue Iversan.
2. Resolution 2011-045.
3. Resolu�ion 2011-046.
�
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 12, 2411
TU; Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator
Sue Iverson, Directar a� Finance and Adnainistrative Services
SUSJECT: Esiablishing 2011 Truth-In-Taxation Hearing Dates
Adoption of the Preliminary 2Q ll Operating Levy Payable in 2012
Bac�ground:
By Septetnber 15, 20I 1, the City is reyuired to adop# and certify to Ramsey County a preliminary levy
and Truth-In-Taxation hearing dates.
Discussion�:
Uperatin� Le�
Based on City Cauncil direction at the August 29, 2011 work session, staff has prepared a preIiminary
levy of $3,132,264. (This is an increase of $91,300 over the number given to the City Councit at the
work session as staff has incozporated the chang�s r�quested by ihe City Council.)
There are no levy lirnits for taxes payabI� in 2012.
The proposed levy is a 3.0% increase over the 2011 levy; however, the City's portion of the levy zs
$2,869,920 after Fiscal Dispariiies which equates to a 4.7% increase over the 2011 City portian of the
levy of $2,740,931. This results in a. 7.0% increase in the Tax Rate from 2011, as the City's tax capacity
fell by $243,213 or -2.1 % due to market changes and the formula changes for t�able val�e regarding the
Market Value Exclusion program (MVE}. The impact on an average tnedium home valued at $272,800 is
an increase of $31.63 or 4.9% annually. The average decrease in market value for residential property in
Arden Hills was 1.2°/o. Determination of �he preliminary levy amount is based on 2Q12 budget
information asse�bled to-date. (This inforrnation is summarized in Attachment A.)
Public Safety accounts for 1.9°/a of the levy increase and $7.62 or 2G.1% of the taY inerease to the average
madium homeowner in the City of Arden HilIs. Without the public safety increase, ihe budget would
show a l.�% increase in the Levy over last year. {If no chang�s were made to the levy over last year, the
average rn�dium homeowner in the City of Arden Hilis would still see an increase of $1 Q.22 in their
property taxes as a result of the Legislative changes and market shifts - see Attachment A.)
Memo
City Council
2011 Truth-in-Taxation Hearing Dates and 2012 Preliminary Tax Levy
2
Truth-in-Taxation Hearing Dates:
The 20a9 Legislaiure changed the Truih-in-Ta�ation laws. We are now only required to announce and
schedule one regular meeting at which the council discusses the budget and levy and takes comments
fro�x� t�ae public. We may adop� the budget and final levy after the hearing during the same meeting. The
meeting must be bettiveen November 2� and December 26 and must occur at or after b p.m. We must
notify the county auditor by �eptember 15`� of the meeting date and time.
The Council rnay choose to have a separate meeting ar may choose to do this at a regular meating. 5taff
is providing two options for the Council to choose from:
Monday, December 5, 2011 — 6:00 p.m. (Special meeting) or
Monday, December 12, 2Q10 — 7:00 p.�n. —(Regularly sched�zled meeting)
Tt is anticipated the Council will adopt the final 201 i levy payable in 2012, and the 2012 budget, on
Decem€ber 12, 2011.
Recammended ActioQ:
1. Adopi Resolution 2011-045, a Resolution setting the preliminary levy for taxes payable in 2012
in the amount of $3,132,264.
2. Adopt Res�lution 2011-046, a Resolutian adopting Truth-in-Taxation public hearing dates for
proposed taxes payable in 2012. The date established is Decetiiber �, 2411.
Attachment A
Nlemo dated September 12, 2411
�
EN HILLS
�►�� .�����i��
DATE: September 12, 201 l.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Adminisirator
Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Adnainxstrative Services
SUBJECT: 2012 Proposed Preliminary Budget and Ta� Levy
INTRODUCTION
In prepaz�ation for adoption of the preliminary tax levy at the first meeting in September, this
�nemo addresses the foilanving information: preliminary tax levy, residential property values,
operating budget, salary and b�nefit changes, and prelirniz�ary f�nd balance projectians. This
information has been updated bas�d on the feedback received from the City Council at ihe
August 29, 2011 work sessian.
PRELIMiNARY TAX LEVY
The table below provides a cozx�parisan of the 2011 adopted levy and ihe �evy needed to support
the prelimFnary 2412 budget and capital projects. It also shows a comparison o� the City's t�
rate.
You wili see that fik�e Ievy has increased by 3% over 2011 and the tax rate has increased, this is
due in part to the cha�ge in legislation regarding the Market Va1ue Homestead Credit {MVHC)
prograzxz, a xeduction in our share of fiscal disparxty dollars, and the increase in the levy.
Memo
City Council
2012 Proposed Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy
2
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES
According io information provided by Rarnsey County in March of this year, the median horrze
value in Arden Hills will decrease from $276,000 �ar 2011 t�es, to $272,800 for 2012 taxes
which is a 1.16% drop i� value compared to the county average decrease of 4.41 %.
The MVHC program was replaced with the ner�v Market Value Exclusion (MVE) program,
which reduces the local taxable value of homestead properties under $413,800 at which point the
credit is phased out. This afFects the Ciiy's tax rate as it redc�ces the overall taxable value of the
City. All jurisdictions will see an increase in tax raies in 2012 as a result of this change.
• Old MVHC Pro�ram
Under the old MVHC program, home property taxes were reduced by a State credit. The
prograzx� was designed to hold local goverr�ments harmless by a reimbursement from the
�tate of Miz�.nesota for the sum af a�l credits provided. As the City Couz�cii is aware, this
credit has been red�ced or eliminated altogether in most years due to Staie budget cuts.
(It was only fully funded one year out of the nine that it was in effect.)
Another cozx�plicating camponent of the old MVHC program was that the estimated
amount of crediis needed to be included in ihe City's levy, even tk�ough no
reimb�arsemeni from the State wauld occur. This caused a n�ismatch between the adopted
l�vy and the actual levy collections.
• New MVE Pro�ram
Under the new MVE program, a portion o� t�Ze home's market value is excluded for tax
purposes. This creates a new Taxabie Market Value (which is lower than the estimated
Market Value}, as well as a red�ced value for tax co�putations (ta�able value).
On� b'rg advantage of this prograzn is that the siate credits are eliminated, which mearzs
there is no need to add estimated MVHC cred'zts to the a�erall levy amount.
The following table pravid�s an exa�ple o� how the new prograa�n will work for five different
home values. Hoxnes valued at $76,000 receive the maximum value reductian, and homes
valued at $413,800 (value at which th� exclusion is phased out) and above receive no value
reduction.
Memo
City Council
2012 Proposed Preliminary Budget azld Tax Levy
3
Home Market Value $ 76,000 $150,OQQ $ 272,800 $ 350,D00 $ 500,040
Mar[cet Val�e Exclusion 30,400 23,740 12,688 5,740 -
Marfcet Valus Afer Excl�si�n $ 45,600 $126,260 $ 260,1 T2 $ 344,260 $ 50Q,000
Taxable Value - OLD $ 76q $ 1,500 $ 2,728 $ 3,500 $ 5,040
Taxable Value - NEW $ 45B $ 1,263 $ 2,601 $ 3,443 $ 5,000
Difference in Ta�ble Value -�40.4% -15.8% -4.7% -1.6% 0.0%
In order to evaluate the true impact io ihe residential property owner, you need �a take into
account Xhe decr�as� in fiscal disparities, the change in the taxable value be%re tk�e MVE, and
the eifects oi the new MVE pragram. To help illustrate this, ihe foilowing table shows the
impact to the residential property owner due to the reduction iz� fiscai disparit� dollars, changes
in fhe assess r�arket value, and changes in the City's overall taxable value be�ore ihe new
legzslation. This would be an "app�es-to-apples" comparison as it is the same formula used in
2011 if we use a 0% levy increase.
Pay 2012 MV 500,000@1.OMo (B7 x E}+ 76,o�0�.4o%
X0.934 rem � 1.25% (612 x D) - rem�.09% {G} x%
EatimatedTax �islrictrate es % aftatal rate: -�21%:���'���.�
150,OD0 1,500 $3fi5.�6 $237.40 $49.85
,•:272;800 2,728 $663.33 $126.88 $26.64
`,'=_=350_000 _ 3.500 �851.80 $57.4D $t2.05
.38
{F) - {F{) � Annual Inctease Monthlv incr.
$315.21 $2.33 $ 0.19
$fi37.27 $4.06 $ 0.34
$839.75 ($5.18) $ (D.43)
1,216.85 ($14.p4) $ (0.84}
9,977.38 ($13.84) $ (1.15)
Memo
City Council
2012 Proposed Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy
4
As previously noted, you now must no�v account for the new MVE which reduces the taxable
�a�ue of the Ciry as the new prograz�n "e�cludes" a portion of the taxable value of qualifying
�omesteaded property. We also use a 0% zncrease to calculate this effect.
Pay 2011 MV 76,OOP�.40%
X0,988 �amuplo413�3s�na {D-E}
Estimated Yax District rate as °/a of rotal rate;
`:150,000 23,744 '[26,254
" 272:800 '[2.688 2B4.112
sao,000c�i.o i� ;e� x cs+ � {e� x cr �
rem � 1.25°h {812 z 0) {B12 x D}
N!A
6.38
7
The net effect on the residential taxpayer 2012 will be as follows:
Tatal Change
Annual Increase Monthly incr.
i$1.i6) $ i0.10)
$10.22 $ 0.85
$17.54 $ 4.46
$25.61 $ 2.13
$44.09 $ 3.67
Taxable Sefone Legislative Change
Val�@ Impact from Maricef Shifts Impacl from Legislative Chg Total Change
B14 Credit Annua! Increase Monthly iner. Annuaf Increase Monthlv incr. Annual Inerease Monthly incr.
150,000 ($2.33) ($0.19) $1.17 $Q.'10 ($1.16) $ {0.14)
272,800 ($4.06) {$0.34) $�4.2$ $�.19 $1Q.22 $ 0.85
350,000 $5.�8 $0.43 $22.72 $4.89 $1'7.54 $ 1.46
5Q0 ODO $10.Q4 $0.84 $35.65 $2.97 $25.61 $ 2.13
7'50,000 ($13.84) ($1.15} $57.93 $4.$3 $44.09 $ 3.67
Me�no
City Couzacil
2012 Proposed Prelznraz�ary Budget and Tax Levy
5
The £oilowing chart illustrates the total effect including the 3% increase in the levy. {This is the
same in%r�xxation shown on page one of this mer�o.}
Pay 2D11 MV 7QOOOQ.40% 500,000@�.6% (B7 x G) �
X 0.988 remuptoa�a�es�.os (� - E) rem � 1.25% (B12 x D)
Estimaied Tax District rate as °k oF total rate: �E{' ;'
'<.::150.ODfl 23.740 126,260 1,263
" ` 272, 800 1
350;000:
�
�
�
112 2,601
260 3.443
125
(97 x G) +
(B12 x Q)
T
78
Toial Change
Annual increase Monthly incr.
$31.63 $ 2.64
$45.88 $ 3.82
$66.76 $ 5.56
$110.96 $ 9.25
The net effect an the reside�tial taxpay�r in 2012 will be as follows:
Memo
Ciry Council
2012 Proposed Pxeliminary Budget and Tax Levy
b
OPERATiNG BUDGET
Sala and Benefits
The 2012 preliminary budget was prepared assuzxaing a 1.5% wage acljust�nen� for non-union
staff {1.0% Jan 15tI1.0% Jul lst} and a 1.0% vcrage adjustment for unian staff (1.0% Jan 15t). As
previousiy discussed with the City Council, in surveying surrounding communities, most have
included a 2.0% COLA increase in their preliminary estimates at this #ime. The budget also
ass�.unes a$21 per month increase in the City's contributian to h�alth and dental insurance. The
increasa for 2012 is 3.6% for medical. In 200$, the City added a high-deductible HSA pla�
which has been helping to keep our costs low, in 2011 we saw a decrease af 13.1%, so there was
no increase in the City contribution iz� 20 � 1. Dental has been estimated at 10% as we have not
y�t received the actual rates from the insurance carrier.
General Fund
Revenues and expenditures are shown in the table below. We have highlighted ztems that impact
tl�e ta� levy and proposed budget on ihe next page to give you a brief overview. More detailed
coz�n�entary if found in the department and fund pages of the budget doc�r�ent.
City of Arden Hiils
General Fund
Actual Actual 8udget Amended Actual Proposed Adopted °/a Change
FY 2009 FY 2Q10 PY 203 t FY 2U11 6130111 FY 2012 FY 2012 11 vs 12
Revenu��
Ta�s
Licenses and Permifs
plher Intergovernmenta[
Charges for Services
Fines & ForFeiLs
5pecial Assessments
Miscellaneous
iransfers
Tatal Revenues
Expenditures bv_Ca{�aON
Personal Senrices
Materials and Supplies
piher Sen,ices and Charges
Capifal OuSay
7ransfers
CondngencylReserves
%ta[ Expenditures
2,835,253 2,867,028 3,069,925 3,069,925 (8,961) 3,161,825 - 2.99%
318,849 255,265 252,600 252,640 131,$72 256,850 - 1.68%
'i3U,557 118,981 61,OQp 61,046 38,009 115,5$2 - 89.48%
395,29D 388,637 386,60i 386,601 165,199 4fl3,775 - 4.44%
23,668 2&,'S49 50,44# 50,A41 7,51D 45,462 - -9.87%
- - - - - 210 - 4.00%
42,945 53,054 76,650 76,656 t4,787 73,922 - -3.56%
0.00°/a
$ 3,752,563 $ 3,711,515 $ 3,897,217 $_ 3 S97 2i7 $ 348.215 $ 4 057 626 $ 4.12%
$ 1,30Q,333 $ 1,358,488 $ #,319,470 $ 1,319,476 $ 677,461 $ 1,343,824 $ - 1.85%
962,9fl5 22&,136 195,i30 195,136 99,973 188,D85 - -3.61%
1,935,629 1,914,592 2,129,Sfl6 2,129,806 894.$77 2,285,7�7 - 7.32%
- - - - 176 - - 0.00%
378,69& 279,266 252,699 252,fi06 - 240,D00 - -4.99%
20,211 20,21� __1Q0.00%
$ 3,777,56�4 $ 3,7fi9,482 $ 3,917,217 $ 3,917,217 $ 1,672,487 $ 4,057,626 $ - 3.5&%
Fund Balance - January 1 2,145,930 2,120,329 2,o62,962 2,062,952 � 2,D62,962 2,042,962
F�ccess Reaenue O+,er E�enditure 25 001 57 367 20 oU0 20 000 1 324 272 �
Fund Balance - December 3t $ 2,12D,929 $ 2,062,962 $ 2,042,9s2 $ 2,Ok2,9b2 $ 738,689 $ 2,042,96T
Memo
City Council
2012 Proposed Prelz�inary Budget and TaX Levy
7
Revez�ues
AIl revenue items were evaluated based on cuzxent econam�c conditions and past trends. The
most notable item is with the elimination of the General Fund Re�enue
MVHC program and the new MVE program, there is nnvHc � 61,��a
no longer a need to budget for tlxe MVHC payment Levy Increase 91,300
Water Tpwer Renta�s 10,000
ihat has been �nalloted or cut. In 201 �, the City Program Fie[d Use 5,sso
budgeted $61,774 as a negative rever�ue source to Ofher Misc Adjustments a,a9�
account for this cut. The 3% levy �ncrease adds $160,409
$91,30p in tax revenues. Water Tower Antenna
Rentals are up $10,000 as a result of current contract rates. Aduli and Youth Program Field Use
has been added as a result af the direction of the City Council during the discussio� o� the Fee
Schedule.
Expendit�ares
In 2008, EDA expendituxes were z�noved from the EDA Fund to the General Fund under the
Plaza.ning & Zoning department as there was a negative fund balance, and transfers to replenish
the fund were budgeted from the General Fund. The fund balance in the EDA Fund is now
estimated to be appraxirnaiely $1.15,000 by the end af 2011. As part of the 2012 budget, the
EDA expenditures were moved from the Genexal �und back ta �ie EDA Fund. These consist of
prirnarily salary and benefit costs {$40,4f 4), hawever auditing, accounting, IT, and insurance
have also been alfocated {$$,788}. The transfer from the General Fund to the EDA Fund has
been eliminated.
General F�nd Expend'Rures
Salary & Benefils
Intern Comrnunity Dev
Moa+e Costs to EDA
Eliminate lransfer to �DA
Other Prof Services Admin
Public Safety Contract fncr
Elections
Copy Nlachine & Postage Machine
Go�rnment Buildings
�[a Contingency B�dgeted
Council Training 8� Newsle[ters
Increased Fin 5ys & ITcosts
4T Snowplow�rtg
Emergency Management
Other Misc Adjustments
The Co�munity Developr�ent Int�rn position has been
increased %r a%2 tirr�e position for a fiill year to help
accomplish the goals tk�at were established for the
department during the Council goal setting process.
Public Safety is increased by $58,820 far increases in the
�'ire Contract ($13,467, 3.55%}, Sheri��s Contract
($33,96b, 3.63%), 911 Dispatch Services {$7,053,
16.73%), and Animal Control {$4,334, 72.23%).
Animal Control will now be provided by the Raznsey
County Sheriff beginning Jan�ary 1, 2012.
Other Professional Services were increased in the
Administration department to fund costs �or autside
consultants for various development activities.
$ 34,118
7, 000
{49,252)
(12,60U)
91,30D
58, 824
16, 284
16,OOb
(28, 933)
(20,211)
4, 805
5>670
13,352
(5,654}
There were no elections in 2011 as our e�ec�ions are in the even nurnber years. This is an
inerease o� $1.6,280 aver the 2Q 11 budget.
Memo
City Council
2012 Propased Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy
8
$ l 0,00Q has bee� budgeted for a lease on a capy machine. The current copy machine in six
years old and was puxchased �or $27,00� and has a trade-in value of $700. The current
maintenance agreement expired in June of this year. The current r�achin� do�s not r�eet the
needs af the City and staff has been working to review all department and City needs and has
received bids and is in t�e process of evaluating th�m. The City's postage meier has an annual
cost of $6,000 and was previously not zncluded in the budget, it has now been added to the
budget.
The Gover-nment Suildings budget was reduced substantially to more accurately reflect casts for
utilities. An amount was budgeted for the increased cost for the Ramsey County Maintenance
Facility lease as the cold storage will be converted to heated storage. The net effect is a$28,933
decrease to this budget.
There is no Reserve/Contingency budgeted in the 20 � 2 budget as proposed.
Other rx�.i�cellaneous adjustments includ�: an increase in the Mayor & Cou�cil budget for
newsletter costs and txaining; increases in �ie Finance and Adminis�trative Services budget for
Springbrook software maintenance costs and IT services from Roseville; incxease in �lie Streets
budget for snowplowing ov�rtir�e based on the previo�s iwo-year hisiory; a reductian in
emergency managerzaent costs; and aiher miscellaneous adjustrr�ents.
Other Funds
We have previously nated the changes to �he EDA Fund as costs have been moved from the
General Fund to the EDA Fund. Staff is also recommending a transfer of $65,000 from the PIR
Fund for the Gateway sig�s. There were no significant chariges to the oiher Special Revenue
Funds with the exception of ihe Com�unity Services Fund being folded into the Public Safety
Capital Fund. This is being done in part because of new accounting standards but also because
the charitable gambling proceeds can only be used for public safery capital purchases, as a result,
Council will be asked to formally dissolve this f�znd and move the baiance to the Public Saf�ty
Capital Fund at a future Councii meeting.
There ar� no significant change� to ihe Debi Service Fund.
Capital �unds were discussed at our J�ne meeting during the Capital Improvemen� Plan (CIP)
revzew. They will agai� b� brought back for discussion at our Novezx�ber worksession.
Enterprise Funds have been evaluated and chan.ges made ta 2012 Rate Increases
accurately reflect economic conditions and hisiorical trends. A
updated rate study will be done and presented to the City Council at Water 7%
the November worksesszon. The rates included in the proposed Sanitary Se+nr�r 2%
budget are from the 2008 Rate Study. Surface Water 3%
�►T -i�iit+7
City Council
2012 Proposed Preliminary Budget and T� Levy
9
GENERAL INFORMAT�ON
A final levy is estabiished and certif ed in Decernber. As Council knows, once a preliminary
levy is established, the amount can be reduced, but it cannot be increas�d.
It should be nated tk�at the 3% levy increase provides no op�ortunity to build fund balances in
capital f�nds {Park Fund, PIR/Capital, Public Safety). If Council desires an opportunity to
discuss addiiional transfers to capital f�nds, you zx�ay wanf ta consider a higher preliminary tax
levy.
�
�N HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RE�OLUT��N NO. 2U1 X-045
A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY
FOR TA.XES PAYABLE �N 2012
BE IT RESOLVED by the Arden Hills City Couz�cil tka.at the iallow�ing proposed sums of
mpney be levied for Ievy year 2011 payable in 2012 upon taxa�Ie property in said City of Arden
Hills %r the �ollowing purposes:
CERT�F�ED
LEVY AMOUNT
General Fund $3,�32,264
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE C�TY QF ARDEN H�LLS
THI� 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011.
DAVID GRANT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PATRICK KLAERS, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
_ _ __ _ _ .
� tion A
p
Resolution 2011-046
__ __
CTTY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESUTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2411-046
RESOLUT�4N ADOPTING TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
PROPOSED TAXES PAYABLE IN 2012
BE IT RESOLVED by the Arden Hill� City Council that the following Truth in
Ta�ation Public Hearing date, time and place for proposed property iaxes payable in 2012 be
certified ta the Ramsey County Auditor and that notice of the Public Hearing be published in
accordance wi�h Minnesota Statute.
Public
Hearin�
Date; December 5, 20ll
Time: 6:00 P.M.
Place: Council Chambers
1245 West Highway 96
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HYLLS
THIS 12��' DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011.
DAVID GRANT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PATR�CK KLAERS, CITY ADMINiSTRATOR
_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ .. ...
0 tion B
p
Resolution 2011-046
_ _ _ _ ... . .... ..... ......... .. ..
_ __ _ _
C�TY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAM�EY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-046
RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRUTH �N TAXATION PUSLIC HEARING DATE FOR
PROPOSED TAXES PAYABLE IN 20i2
BE IT RESOLVED by th� Arden Hills City Council that the following Tr�.rth in
Ta�ation Public Hearing date, time and place for proposed property taxes payable in 2012 be
certified to the Raz�asey Caunty Audrtor and tl�ai notice of the Public Hearing be published in
accordance with Minnesota Statute.
Public
Hearin�
Date: December 12, 2011
Time: 7:00 P.M.
PEace: Council Chambers
1245 West Highway 96
PAS�ED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNC�L OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HTLLS
THIS 12t�` DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011.
DAVID GRANT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PATRTCK KLAERS, CITY ADMINISTRATOR