The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-17-12 PTRC Chair: Cindy Garretson(exp.2014) 1245 W. Highway 96 Committee Members: Z AR N HILLS Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phil Kramlinger(exp.2012) _`�� 651.792.7800 Jane Larson(exp.2013) www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us Don Messerly(exp.2012) Parks, Trails, a n d Chuck Michaelson(exp.2014) Nancy O'Malley(exp.2014) Recreation Committee John Peck(exp.2013) Harold Petersen(exp.2013) April 17 2012 Steve Scott (exp.2014) 7 Rich Straumann(exp.2013) 6.30 p.m. Council Liaison: City Hall Brenda Holden City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well-maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. Agenda ember sh uid ll th i :. Call to Order 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2. MINUTES A. March 20, 2012 Regular Meeting 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Trail Signage 1. Design Review 2. Finalize proposed sign locations B. Park Bench Location Recommendations C. Other Unfinished Business 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Off Leash Dog Area Liability Discussion B. Preliminary 2013-2017 CIP Discussion C. Other New Business 5. REPORTS A. City Council Report B. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Report 6. NEXT MEETING A. Tuesday, May 15,2012 A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Azenda Item 2A : Minutes for Approval: March 20, 2012 'It EN HILLS DRAFT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY,MARCH 20,2012 ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL MEETING TO ORDER Chair Garretson called the March 20, 2012,meeting of the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee to order at 6:36 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Garretson, Committee Members Nancy O'Malley, Harold Peterson, John Peck. Committee Member Chuck Michaelson arrived at 7:05 p.m. OTHERS PRESENT: Park and Recreation Manager Michelle Olson, Council Liaison Brenda Holden and Prospective Committee Member Jane Larson. ABSENT: Committee Members Phil Kramlinger, Don Messerly, Steve Scott, and Rich Straumann. 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Committee Member O'Malley motioned to approve the agenda as presented seconded by Committee Member Peck. The motion carried unanimously(5-0). 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—December20,2011 MOTION: Committee Member Peck motioned to approve the January 10, 2012, minutes, seconded by Committee Member Michaelson. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Joint Meeting Debrief Chair Garretson indicated she felt the joint meeting went well and that there was good participation. Council Liaison Holden informed the committee that the engineering firm URS talked to the Canadian Pacific Railroad about replacing the railroad trestle over New Brighton Road since it was in bad shape. She indicated the railroad informed URS that they did not plan on replacing the trestle any time soon and that no one has approached the railroad about a possible trail. Committee Member Peck suggested the PTRC contact the railroad about adding a trail on the east side. Ms. Olson asked if Council Liaison Holden was in favor of having staff approach the railroad. Ms. Holden indicated this was entirely up to the committee. Committee Member Peck asked Ms. Olson to forward the contact information and maybe one of the committee members would volunteer to contact the railroad regarding the trail. Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes March 20,2012 Page 2 Ms. Olson indicated she felt everyone did a good job of presenting at the joint work session and asked if they had any comments on how the meeting went. She stated that the committee did get some direction from Council and that she has added Valentine Park Improvement Review to the list of projects they will be working on. B. Trail Signage Ms. Olson informed the committee that she will be meeting with Vacker Sign Company,who did the park signs, to review the design ideas for maintenance and durability. She also indicated they had discussed having the Boy Scouts install the signs; however, Public Works Director Maurer was in favor of having Public Works install the signs. Committee Member Peck questioned how they would go about deciding on placement of the signs and indicated he marked his choices on a map. Ms. Olson stated this would be the committee's decision. Committee Member Peck suggested the members bring their ideas on sign placement to the next meeting. Discussion ensued on ranking the signs by priority in order to get the important ones placed first. Ms. Olson stated she would bring a large map to the next meeting which the committee could use to show placement and would also report back on the findings from the sign company. Council Liaison Holden asked whether they planned on going with the single or double post signs. Committee Member Peck indicated the Committee had decided on the single post as opposed to the double post since it was more subtle. C. Newsletter Article Assignments Ms. Olson stated she felt the committee did a wonderful job putting together the articles in the past 6 months. She informed that she will be routing a sign-up sheet for the next six assignments/months and that the next article is due on April 6. She indicated the article could be sent to her and she would then forward it on. D. Other Unfinished Business Committee Member O'Malley indicated she had noted somewhere in the minutes of a previous meeting that Ms. Olson had called the Karth Lake Improvement District Board and was wondering what this was about. Ms. Olson indicated the after the committee suggested possibly adding a fishing dock off of Karth Lake, she contacted the president of the board to see how the other Karth Lake Association members felt about the idea. The president checked with the members and indicated there was a 50150 split on having a fishing dock since the lake tends to get fished out. Ms. Olson stated she will report back on this item after the board revisits the topic at their April meeting. Committee Member Peck asked whether the Improvement District included everyone in the neighborhood. Committee Liaison Holden replied that the Improvement District represented residents owning property on the lake but does not include all residents. 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Comprehensive Plan Discussion Ms. Olson reiterated that at the February Joint Work Session, Council brought up the Open Space Plan that was approved in 2002. She indicated that in 2009 the PTRC worked on updating the plan within Chapter 9 of the Comprehensive Plan and that she has provided them with copies of this plan which includes the trail segments. Ms. Olson stated the committee Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes March 20,2012 Page 3 updates the trail segments periodically and feels it would be a good idea to review these every year and make edits even if the edits would not be official until the next Comprehensive Plan update occurs. Ms. Olson indicated another option would be to update the Open Space Plan which included surveys to residents and neighborhood meetings. If the PTRC is in favor of doing that they would need to bring to Council as a recommendation since it was a$60,000 plan in 2002 or the committee could continue to review the Comp Plan. Ms. Olson asked for input on how the committee felt they should proceed and comments regarding the trail segments. Discussion ensued on how to proceed. Ms. Olson stated she felt it might be a good idea to review this within the next CIP. B. Park Bench Implementation Location Discussion Ms. Olson informed that staff will bring the bench purchases to Council in April and then the PTRC will recommend locations for placement of the benches. She has provided a map depicting the proposed locations with a blue triangle. Ms. Olson asked the PTRC members to review the potential locations for eight park benches and bring to the next meeting. Discussion ensued on placement of the benches. C. Earth Clean Up Day—Tony Schmidt Park Saturday,April 14—9:00 a.m. Ms. Olson informed that for the Clean Up Day is Saturday, April 14t from 9:00 until 11:30 a.m. They will be meeting at the beach pavilion area of Tony Schmidt Regional Park at 8:45 a.m. As in the past, she has invited Smith Medical and is working on getting additional volunteers as well as the Boy Scouts. Ms. Olson feels it is important that the committee members try to attend since the PTRC sponsors the event. Committee Member Peck asked if a Clean Up Day should be directed to any of the City's parks like Perry Park. She indicated the group could do this but it would be in addition to Tony Schmidt Park. Ms. Olson indicated that if she gets enough volunteers on the 141h she would like to go all the way to Perry Park,the Elmer L. Anderson Trail and the Ramsey County open space area. REPORTS A. City Council Report Council Liaison Holden informed that at the March 19 Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission,the Commission provided Council with some of the projects they will be working on during the year. One of the projects they will be working with is the Watershed Organization in order to pursue establishing waterlines. They also would like to work on the Comprehensive Plan and color code the various areas like parks and open space. Council Liaison Holden indicated another project the Planning Commission will be working on is to review the City's bike parking requirements and to address the bike parking needs. They will also continue with the proactive implementation of the B-2 zoning district and a subcommittee is meeting to see if they can phase in a median. She also indicated they are continuing to regulate the signage within the City and removing signs that do not meet the requirements. Council Liaison Holden indicated that the Salvation Army was interested in moving their adult rehabilitation facility to Arden Hills over in the industrial area behind Cub. She Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes March 20,2012 Page 4 indicated some council members were not in favor because they did not support the rezoning. She indicated that Sands Company would like to build a 55-unit four-story building with workforce rental housing located on County Road F and are asking the City for funding which the City is looking into. Council Liaison Holden informed that Rob Davidson,the owner of the Holiday Inn, would like to convert the building into apartments. She stated that at this point the Planning Commission has tabled but that Mr. Davidson is planning on bringing something forward in the near future. Council Liaison Holden mentioned a concern about the parking at Bethel and indicated she would bring up the suggestion of only having parking on one side of the street to an upcoming Council meeting. Public Works/Park and Recreation Report Ms. Olson informed the City has hired a full-time Assistant City Engineer, John Anderson. Ms. Olson stated that the Saturday of Service Program,which some of the local churches are involved in, asked the city for any projects they could work on for their big event on May 5. Ms. Olson indicated the volunteers will be working on cleaning of the parks, some needed painting projects and other various City projects. Ms. Olson informed that the Eagle Scout's will also be finishing up with a bathroom enclosure project at Cummings and Floral Park that same day. They have installed enclosures at Royal Hills, Perry Park, Ingerson Park and Freeway Park in the past year. Ms. Olson mentioned that the Valentine Park project is going out for bid on April 18th and then will be coming back to Council for review on April 30, 2012. She indicated that the Hazelnut Irrigation Project and Council support for a DNR grant application for a paved trail from Valentine to County Road E2 on Old Snelling are going to Council for approval on Monday, March 26. Ms. Olson informed she will be getting the numbers for ice skating rink usage for the next meeting. Numbers are up from the previous year because most of the other city rinks were closed because of the warm weather. Ms. Olson informed she included the 2012 Friends Tree Sale brochure which allows residents to order a tree which they can donate to a park. The deadline to place an order is April 20. Committee Member Petersen asked if anymore thought was given to the Adopt a Garden. Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes March 20,2012 Page 5 Ms. Olson indicated an article was placed in the Newsletter but there was little response. She asked if there should be discussion on how to get the neighbors more involved. The consensus of the committee was to add as a topic for one of the newsletters. Council Liaison Holden suggested giving an award for the best garden. Committee Member O'Malley asked if they would have input on where to put the donated trees. Ms. Olson indicated they could donate a tree and indicate where they would like it placed. Otherwise the forester makes the decision on placement. She indicated they could e-mail her suggestions on placement and then she would have Public Works look at the suggested locations. Ms. Olson reminded everyone about the Earth Clean Up Day on April 14. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Committee Member Peck moved to adjourn, seconded by Committee Member Michaelson. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next meeting is scheduled for April 17, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. Azen da Item 3A: Trail Signage EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 Agenda Item: 3.A. TO: Parks Trails and Recreation Committee FROM: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager `rn� SUBJECT: Trail Signage Background At the February joint PTRC/City Council meeting, the Council gave preliminary approval for the PTRC to move further into design on trail signage. The next step identified was to work with a sign company to get a quote on sign production based on the PTRC's preliminary design. Staff met with Carol Kriegler from Vacker Sign Company to discuss the trail signage design. Vacker Sign Company designed and installed all of our park name signs. Staff laid out the PTRC's recommendation on signage (Attachment A) and the budget for this project. After meeting with Ms. Kriegler, she has recommended three options for trail signage. Staff will have these designs/layouts at Tuesday night's meeting. Ms. Kriegler does not recommend cedar construction for the frames and has proposed other, more durable and maintenance friendly materials. The design and layout is similar to the PTRC proposal. Vacker Sign Company is supplying samples of the proposed sign materials at Tuesday night's meeting. Staff also discussed the mapping portion of the design to gauge what Vacker Sign Company would need to export the map to the sign company. Ms. Kriegler is confident that she can work with the ArcView program that our City utilizes for our mapping. Staff included a trail map for the Committee to identify trail signage locations (Attachment B). Please plan on coming to the meeting prepared to recommend locations. A large trail map will be available for the committee to work with at Tuesday's meeting. Requested Action Staff is looking for the Committee to recommend a trail design option and specific trail signage locations to move forward for City Council review. 04172012 Trail signage design Attachment A: PTRC preliminary Design Information __ __ _ _. ___ - - _ _ .. ,. ___. __ _._ - - - __.._ .. _ ___ -- _. ._ ___ �___� _ , - � �_ __ ___._ � ' a __ __ ,_ _. --- ;__ , _ =� _ __ _ — — � _ ___ _ _ __ _ ..... _ ,_ a �_ ._..._ __. _ .._.. ._ _ _ yy _..___ __-- 1 - ,_. . _... ._ _ _ _. 3 � a __ �._. - _. .---- -._. ...---_.__... 4 '' __ _ s ;. 4 _... .._._,:, l � � � � � 3= ,- ._ _�- _ =�.� _ . _ s __. __ __ _ __ _ ___ _ _ __ __ _ --_ _ . _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ __ ___ . _ — _ __ __ __ ._ } PTRC/ City Council Joint Work Session ...................................................................................... ..................................... Below is the basic concept being considered for trail signage: 1 12 x 18 Direct printed on J 25 poly metal ► Cedar or wood post with frame around sign ► Arden Hills logoIme'a" ► Metal signs would feature color trail map that would be a zoomed in portion for each particular trail. Current City trail map would be divided into zones. ► You are here arrows would be utilizedy ► Approximately 20-25 signs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Attachment B: Trail Map for Committee to review for trail signage locations AeELESTrer ) >a R i Sun Fish _ Irdrri Lake 3a lfnrmr H Park /�/ 2 N roO6aRIPm.N/ ZB W COUNTY ROAD N W ti COUNTYROAD 96 W 2A ��il <4�PSy O A _ co o °qP z i KARTH LAKE DR = •A � � m m 1LE O 2 Y O T W 2 PLEASANT p Q CIR A �p °'°c Z NURSERY HILL LN c uWii PLEASA S4 ARDEN V� � 2 �u'o Oq i NURSERY HILL CT0- ti ARDEN Round 3 D `P�p Lake ROYAL > 4l 2 W HILLS DR 01 > Q N Ro 1'ul O1Gr AMBLE RD !/ills pQ' Durk DRuuNG COLLEEN Egt CT /j,15C c oprEwgv Q ct VQCT ` WEDGEWOOD 3 3BO COLLEENAVECIRBRIARKNOLL CIR EEN AVE INDIAN OAKS Ci h`'4T O4yat VO •P 2CUMMINGS PARK ORun... ... ° /+�13TH ST NE IP INDIAN OAKS TRL3F INDIAWN OAK C CIR W nrttl 4 PARKSHORE DR 'ark EIDE CIRt >E W 3 O ROYAL LN W'. 2 � 2 INTERSTATE 691 FLORAL OR W = eOstaN J<AFKK OR rmvW Q C w 7 u u Z ✓gNET Cr 2-LENTIN R i LAKE Vq(ENrrvERD CREST RDE COUNTY ROAD F W TIM JPLENTIN nA CE 1 E 4 m �9 rP L' u 1 C CRYSTAL AVE yP W 3 p° > W m %anl'•S<Irinirll LL W am W> I u/cnlinc w Regional Pnrk Q< ° Q Q GRAMME RD O� lark L'alettline .A aVTE jN 3 °✓.Pry' Y Lake '14 k W GLENVIEWAVE 2 VERI'S4V OE W YI1 W� VENUS AVE01 N= O Al ny'.Sc'Irrrri lI RED FOX RD 2 3 COUNTY ROAD E7W�/ Reg real PrO'k Sa z ? a�yo �? i 8FS BPT 2 'Z1 O B yP`Oq t s 3 W >m 10 C GNEN LN CCNP f M =r GREYFOXRD Clmr/rs u it u CNP AR OAKS pq "'f"M Perry Park m I rden m Q THOM DR CT i Uaks' W 2 ARDEWarl, > _ OAKS CT i IMGP OAK AVE C � WrLy AVE COUNTY ROAD E W JO COUNTYROADEW era'risAx9;Ski+.TYe=ay§T,.t�F;#Y�:•9a8fd:StB1 RFb. i NPOL L m lrr'� r v„rt 1;J.Schlaidl LpKEIONPd o Par.,, 13A v Regional Park y 3 Q ARDEN PL O W 2 HUDSON RD i W C C F t1 1`y O° 2 W g ,,;NA e(vD r, W z m C �, ¢ ONP i RQ�a 1'ONEst COUNTY ROAD E W q o g HARRIETAVE ROENPL p A SLN m GRANT RD E m � NOBLE RD y Qra m G<eNPP Yepemr;Val-, yvq LAKE LN Z Lake Pre.l• Qry Q OT rPRS ... Johanna m 2 VE 3T STOWE AVE LAMET71 LN 2 -r TILLER LN TILLER LN Q KATIELN °Y' 3 11E W ; � CARLTON DR KATIE CT BECKMAN AVE BUSSARD CT ly ° m O INGERSON RD �9 INGERSON RD rWO 4� ❑a:churl i PP'L EgSOW CT " Irrgcrvou �P Park c pa /'nrk m g� ` 1 �-ROLDAVE _ ® EDGEWATER AVE 4 2 22 WEDGEIYATERAVE W QDR EDGEWATER AVE I'daon, o O J O u 2 Q ,llor.h y z I?Q y j o Lake W GLEN PAUL AVE k Rp ✓osephine 2 2 GLENPAUL AVE ` yrO GLENHILL W j O QO0 y� COUNTY ROAD D IN 2 GLENHILL RD Exist i n Trail Segments I- aN-AIj�EN HILLS 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet Prepared by: e o.m e., ,.nco.mo mapdoc:ArdenHaisPatnwayse9ments2Gln.mad City of Roseville Engineering Department " GIS e ,(1-11o) map:ArdenHNbPeMweySepmenta2010.pd1 November 23,2010 .m a.N B.N. •oMwR��k��E.,.�..,��No.o.am..� Agenda Item 3B. Park Bench Location Recommendations '!Tt ARZEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 Agenda Item: 3.11. TO: Parks Trails and Recreation Committee FROM: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager SUBJECT: Park Bench Location Discussion Background The park bench implementation program was approved in 2010 by the City Council. This implementation program is on a four year cycle. We are in year three of the cycle. The CIP includes $5,000 each year for the remaining two years, 2012, 2013. The City Council directed staff to select a consistent bench style when replacing or adding benches. The style chosen was the Parkshore Contemporary Bench. This style is a comfortable design made entirely of recycled materials, including the frames. This is an in-ground design, which makes it very sturdy and maintenance free. The bench is cedar colored with black frames. Staff purchased eight of these benches last year. Staff researched 2012 prices and discovered that $5,000 will cover 11 benches this year. One of the PTRC's approved goals is to recommend locations for the purchased benches. Staff will bring the bench purchases to City Council approval in April Staff recommends the PTRC review the attached map and be prepared to recommend bench placement. These locations can be changed or alternate locations can be added by the committee. Staff provided potential locations only for discussion purposes. Requested Action Staff is asking for the PTRC to recommend locations for eleven park benches 04172012 Bench Location Discussion.doc to • AAEIE sr1aM+W P 8 : '° to •eq Knn,.crp Con°p Sun Fish i h/i,IV,Ak ISherriJ.t Off— Lake I 3 5 'Inlun Hill.,Pa6lil NIA, .IrJrr, qg ag ;1Lnnor d ;Wen Hill K j Park Hall n TDODOK(M1HwI --�..ny— 4 O • KARIN LAKE DR p m < 2 p fi3F PLEASANT JP "47L < F� CM O ? m NURSERY HILL LN 2 PLEASANT DR W m • y�i ARDEN NEW DR " 0 �q NURSERY HLL L7 �p V • g tra�JP ARDEN N gp4 y3, FQP Round ROYAL j py Lake NILLS DR y Oty? AMBLE RD Rnt'al P CLUND col'LEEN Caps( CT 'rk • Cta �fsy • TEWAY WEDGEWDO BRIARKNOLL CIR Of EENAVE COLLEENAVE pFA o YCT 41 y4- • 02 3 NDNN OAKS CT > �� . CUNNINGS MARK OR OITE � tU 'tb O fir 13TN ST NF Y L O NDIAN OAKS TRL 0Pa • • DMN A W DAWN DAWN OAKS CIR mCIR IN CARE rnl �qqq jj< 11'k FIDE C Q p ROYAL LN 2 3 OIAp,WiSOMW 1 FLORAL DR W INTERSTATE S RK W rNil `LANET CT VALENTINELAKEKALENTNERO CRESTRO ��—Ir.�► /—r�� NttKE AVE ' F I ,lfunnrh 4ieu. � 1 1 Ni h&h—1 1 'eF 1 CRYSTAL AVE E, loop Sehmidl i gi fulrn r w _Regional Park l�' ` ? IalQ1lline A Proposed GRAYSIE RD �TERST^TEEBI � �� 3 c�F �'I' Lake W GLENVIEwAVE Underpass Bridge .41, � �W or Overpass `—« < VENUS AVE t o 6 Gr �O 1 ��.�/ � «.�•o:rca,.. �'A Rnk,A RED FOX RD 2 3 ``I -�Rc'g+nnat Nar`!. '�a Univrr.iry �L/IMIY ROAD E1 W 5 `SyV I iJcnrine HiII q TH c^ Q ` Z Elenrer F�DO C ` i Srhnnl • ] W �t � 1�CCa'collo Railroad,.^w OBEY)FOXRD • Viaduct m < CaA ARDEN OAKS ON O �U < TMOY Terr �, � O.D. LT ..•. .... "..,.� ARDEP OAKS CT 2 A Vle aPa`M. nderpass OAK AVE YO i i Al 02 DYCt � � • �D � • Q 6i iO I h<tti ail • • • • Benches for Trails/ �` �-�j �' ry Trn,,t'S�'hmidl � a o ARDEN Open Space , ,'• _ W Benches for Play ""°�°""° ,•''- ----- Structures ._�� s a�PY PEst�a fNpRASTAVE o Park Swings Q ♦ -DEN P PSV' m ryROADE W 1 • Bus Benches GRA O Ramsey County 2011 Install BLE RD [ENP Lake LAKE LN POW ��n l•• OW Qr C "�qq 2011 Bench n . • •rll 2 Jnllnnl,a VE 'nrk Location 2 W TILLER LN STOWS AVE LAYETiI L O a ' � TILLER LN a Potential Bench KATIELN �10 19 c�4;� CARLTON DR 'Y $ NG-SON NO Location BECNYAN AVE BUSSARD CT WOEpSON RD 3 IU71E Ci E 2 yo "QV CT egC. FE, • i6r C4c` ln:.rl. Qi. 1qo >Y 2 Li 2 Q a ` m EOGEWATE3AV JERROLDAVE 2 0 O 2. \',vrnnvecrrr,r 'E? W <_= 0u14/,r. EDGEWATER AVE J3 O EDGEWATERAVE O DR w 5 00 m 2 p Lake w d � �� o Jncephine o GLEN MAUL AVE ORS GLENHILL EN FAUL AVE PD 3 C OF' ui 2J o F� GLENHILL RD Arden Hills Pathway LEGEND: /S/City,Asphalt ��' Private,Asphalt PARK BENCH LOCATION MAP City,Concrete Private,Concrete N City,Turf Private,Turf Dala Sorxces end ConbUs'. O„% County,Asphalt City Proposed Pathway 0 350 700 1050 1400 Feet •EN ILLS •Ramsay&o Htl GlS Base Map(3I01/09) jT�7L'.'Jl\`LL'i71,—`1I •CRY,(R Hills 'Loyd Rosevih Erginaednp Daparlmsnl ,�`.,,� County,Concrete �h,i' County Proposed Pathway Prepared by: TUrf mapdoc.enHiHArds alhwa way.m%d County, map ArdanNillsPalhway pd1 City of Roseville Engineering Department v a...•."^ March 6,2009 Azenda Item 4A: Off Leash Dog Area Liability Discussion EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 Agenda Item: 4.A. TO: Parks Trails and Recreation Committee FROM: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager "jW(0 SUBJECT: Off Leash Dog Park Liability Discussion Background At the February joint PTRC/City Council meeting, the Council gave preliminary approval for the PTRC to move further into researching the possibility of creating an off leash dog area in Arden Hills. The Council asked staff and the committee to research the liability of dog parks. Staff contacted the League of Minnesota Cities and the City Attorney to discuss liability. Jackie Torgerson from the League of Minnesota Cities sent an email with helpful information that I have included for the committee to review (Attachment A). In addition, she provided a risk management outline which lays out the important items to consider when offering an off leash dog area (Attachment B). In speaking with the staff member from the League and the City Attorney, there does not seem to be a high liability in offering an off leash dog area. The owner is responsible for the dog. The next steps will be to identify all possible locations for an off leash dog park, research what other Cities are doing, research start up costs, research maintenance needs and costs for the dog area and place all of this information into a draft plan. The Committee can then review the plan in preparation to present to Council. There are no Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget dollars allotted for this project for 2012. Since CIP discussions for 2013-2017 are now beginning, the PTRC may want to consider preliminarily identifying it as a project for 2013. Council will review the CIP in July. The draft proposal could be potentially presented at that time. Requested Action Staff provided this information to begin the process of establishing a work plan for moving forward on proposing the addition of an off leash dog area in Arden Hills. 04172012 Off Leash Dog Area Discussion.doc AttachmentA ., Email from League of Minnesota Cities Michelle Olson From: Jackie L Torgerson ON ig, Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:14 PM To: Michelle Olson Subject: Off-Leash Dog Park-Arden Hills Attachments: offleashd og parks[1].pdf Michelle, I just left you a voice message, but thought I would also follow up with an email. I was recently asked to contact you with additional loss control information regarding an off-leash dog park in Arden Hills. First of all, there isn't anything special that you need to do in order for the city's liability coverage to apply to claims arising from a dog park. From a loss control perspective, here are some general considerations: • Provide a barrier to encourage the dogs to stay in the designated area. If you are near a residential area or busy street, consider a fence with gated entry. A gated entry also makes advisory signs difficult to miss. • Provide trash and containers and even plastic bags to encourage the proper disposal of feces. • Make sure there is adequate parking. Use may exceed expectations. • Consider providing water for dogs or encourage owners to bring plenty of water if none exists at the park. • Remember good maintenance techniques can keep park users safe and reduce liability in the event of a claim. Things like adding mulch to walkways can reduce erosion and increase traction. Be sure to include the dog park in a regular documented inspections program, along with the other parks. With respect to signage, consider posting rules for the following items: 1. Picking up feces 2. Controlling aggressive dogs 3. Leash Requirements, if any 4. Required removal of dogs from leashes in the off-leash boundary (keeping them leashed can cause aggressive behavior) 5. Dogs should be licensed and vaccinated to be allowed in the dog park 6. Children should be supervised at all times while in the dog park 7. Any other special information such as emergency contact info I have collected some city websites that include information on their dog parks. It may be helpful to take a look at what other cities are doing. Here are some links: • Eden Prairie: http://www.edeni)rairie.org/vcurrent/live/article.asp?r=2236 • Edina: http://www.cityofedina.com/ParksAndFacilities/L3-01 VanValkenberg.htm • Minneapolis: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/animal-control/off-leashparks.asp • Woodbury:http://www.ci.woodbury.mn.us/parks/pkdo.qpark.htmI • Rochester: http://www.ci.rochester.mn.us/departments/park/parks/amenities/dogparks.asp • St. Louis Park: http://www.stlouispark.org/dog parks.htm • St. Paul: http://www.stpau1.gov/index.asp?NID=2066 The website dogpark.com might be of interest to you also. There are some helpful resources on there, including information on starting a dog park, sample dog park rules and other dog park resources. I have attached a risk management memo which outlines some of the above information. Again, if you have any additional questions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Take care and enjoy the day! 1 Attachment B: Risk Management Outline from the League of Minnesota Cities C 0 LEAGUE of CONNECTING & INNOVATING INNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION OFF LEASH DOG PARKS WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? Definition The term "dog park" is generally used where the purpose and design of the park is such as to invite dogs, often in an unleashed environment. Some dog parks require membership or charge fees; others are free and open to the public. In general,private parks tend to be those that require fees to assist in the costs of operating the park. Why have Dog Parks? Dogs are popular and people want a safe place to socialize and exercise their dogs. Off-leash parks offer substantial benefits as a way for dog and owner to get exercise and meet new friends. Dog parks are relatively inexpensive to maintain, have no significant history of claims, and have generally been thought to be successful where they have been created. Features Dog parks vary in size and amenities,but the following represent some things to consider. Barriers Consideration should be given to manmade or natural barriers to encourage the dogs to stay within the designated area. Small areas in busy neighborhoods may necessitate a fence around the park with a gated access. Larger areas may allow for natural buffer zones.Nearby property owners and traffic should be considered to determine what level of barrier might be necessary. Rules Rules should be posted at the entrance to the dog park. Indicate the purpose of the park,the hours of operation, and a phone number to report problems and emergencies. General rules include: • Picking up feces. • Keeping control of aggressive dogs. • Leash requirements, if any. Off-leash parks should emphasize that dogs kept on leashes within the off-leash boundary will cause tension and should be avoided. Cities should require that dogs be licensed and vaccinated to be allowed in the dog park. Children should be supervised while in the dog park because playing dogs can run into children and running children may trigger the dog's instinct to chase prey. Any special information about the use of the dog park should be displayed at the entrance. This material Is provided as general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 145 UNIVERSITY AVE.WEST PHONE:(651)281-1200 FAX:(651)281-1298 I N S U RAN C E TRUST ST.PAUI MN_S51n3-2044 TOIL EREL(80o)925-1 J 22 wEB:wwW..LMc,oRG Trash Containers It may take some time to cultivate good habits,particularly for picking up feces. By providing containers and even bags, if possible, compliance will improve. Dog owners must be reminded that good stewardship will ensure the continued availability of the facility. Parking Adequate parking will be necessary to prevent clogging streets or the parking lots of others with dog park patrons. Some cities have found that use of the park greatly exceeded their original estimates; extra parking had to be added. The location of parking should minimize any detours from the most direct route into the park. In general it is a good idea to require the use of a leash in parking areas until entering the off-leash area.Parking leading to a gated entrance provides an opportunity for placing advisory signs that are hard to miss. Water Source Dogs drink plenty of water during play, and some dogs enjoy swimming. Therefore natural ponds or streams may be desirable. On the other hand, if there is mud around, a dog will find it. Some owners prefer to avoid this problem. Owners should be encouraged to bring plenty of water with them if none exists at the park. Design Some parks are specifically designed for smaller dogs. Larger dogs do not usually attack small dogs,but small dogs may be injured engaging in play with much larger dogs. In most cases, dogs properly supervised will socialize easily in the neutral turf of an off leash exercise area. Maintenance Primary maintenance issues include trash removal, snow removal, grass cutting, and wear and tear to walkways. Parks with enough area can fence off portions to allow for vegetation to reestablish itself in over-worn areas. Wood mulch may be applied to walkways to reduce erosion and improve traction. Other Items Learn More Some parks have bulletin boards to provide feedback Following are some web sites where on park use and to report problems.Many parks also have picnic tables,benches, and park shelters for You can find dog parks or information shade and protection from the elements. about dog parks: http://animal.discovery.com/features Conclusion /dogPark/map/states/MN.html Off leash areas, or dog parks,provide great benefits to http://www.ecoanimal.com/do�fun/ dog owners. Current statistics indicate almost one in http://www.dogplay.com/Activities/d four people own a dog. Dogs and their owners are happiest and healthiest when they have opportunities ogpark.html for exercise and meeting others. Dog parks have not http://wwvt.thebark.cbm/cornmunitV proven to be a significant liability risk or source of : /advocacy dogParks/dogParks.htmI complaints by the public. LMCIT Loss Control 05/09 Azenda Item 4B: Preliminary 2013-2017 CIP Discussion EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 Agenda Item: 4.11. TO: Parks Trails and Recreation Committee FROM: Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager `P6 SUBJECT: Preliminary 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Discussion Background Staff is asking for the PTRC to review last year's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects for 2012-2016 (Attached for PTRC review) and give feedback on any changes and additions for the 2013-2017 Program. The Committee has been making suggestions throughout the year (such as bike rikes, off leash dog parks, etc.)and this is the time to propose projects for future years. Staff will be working on the CIP in the next month and will bring back the proposed CIP for Parks to the PTRC to review in detail in May. The Council will be reviewing the CIP at their June 18, 2012 Work Session. There are projects in the CIP that need to be moved to future years or unassigned due to their current circumstances. Those projects are: Mounds View High School Trail Connection (Move to 2014)—Ramsey County Parks and Recreation and the Mounds View School District have no identified funding for this trail. The Elmer L. Andersen extension from the culvert off of County Road E2 to Mounds View High School is tentatively scheduled to be done in 2014. The County and School District would like to revisit that at that time. Old Snelling Avenue Trail — Legacy (Move to unassigned)— The City applied for Legacy Funding for the trail on Old Snelling from County Road E to County Road E2. Unfortunately,the City is no longer eligible for that funding. County Road E Trail — STP Funding (Move to unassigned) The City applied for STP Funding for a trail on County Road E/Lake Johanna Blvd. from the County Road E to Tony Schmidt Regional Park and the Tony Schmidt Regional Park. The City finished in the middle of the projects in scoring. However, the funding mechanism for these projects has not been established and is in question. Staff will also need to add the following projects: 04172012 Capital Improvement Program 13-17.doc Old Snelling Avenue Trail — DNR Local Trail Connection Grant (2013)—The City applied for DNR (Local Trail Connection Program) Funding for a pathway on Old Snelling Avenue from Lake Valentine Road/Valentine Park to County Road E2. Awards will be announced sometime this summer. Hazelnut Park Playground Replacement (2017) - City Play structures are on a 20 year replacement schedule. Hazelnut is up for replacement in 2017. Requested Action Staff is looking for input on potential projects to include in the 2013-2017 CIP. 04172012 Capital Improvement Program 13-17.doc Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 1.0-Park-031 Project Name Park Bench Implementation Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $20,000 The PTRC recommended and established a 4 year implementation schedule. $5,000-2010 $5,000-2011 $5,000-2012 $5,000-2013 The PTRC recommends locations each spring/summer and benches are installed in May/June. Benches will be durable benches made out of recycled plastic. The benches will be one standard style for consistency. Each bench is typically $500 plus shipping and therefore,the City could add up to approximately 7-10 each year. Justification The City Council directed the Parks,Trails and Recreation Committee to consider recommending additional benches in the parks and trail system to meet the aging population in Arden Hills and also families visiting our parks and using our play structures. Prior Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total F---15,-000-1 Construction/Maintenance 5,000 5,000 Total Total 5,000 5,000 Prior Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 15,000 Special Revenue Park Fund 5,000 5,000 Total Total 5,000 5,000 Budget ImpacVOther Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project tt 11-Park-001 Project Name Mounds View HS Trail Connection Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $200,000 A petition was submitted for a sidewalk on the south side of Lake Valentine Road from the 35 W bridge to a sidewalk in front of Mounds View High School. This section is 1,250 feet(0.24 miles). There is an existing guard rail for approximately half of this section,625 feet,that will need to be relocated in order to construct a 6-foot concrete sidewalk. Stormwater will also need to be considered and adressed at any portions of the sidewalk where drainage patterns would change due to an elevated sidewalk. Project costs were revised to include cost of retaining walls,which will be needed in some sections. Justification This is a busy road and is utilized daily by students from Mounds View High School. A petitition was brought to the City Council asking for consideration of a trail in this area. The added library at the New Brighton Family Service Center may increase the need for this connection. The PTRC recommended this sidewalk be considered for construction in 2012. State Aid Funds can be utilized for this sidewalk. In addition,the City Council may consider assessing the school district for a portion of the im rovement. Prior 200,000 Total Prior 200,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Plowing and maintaining this sidewalk would cost approximately$2 per foot to maintain which equals$2,500. Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Prior Budget Items 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 2,500 Maintenance of Parks and Trail 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 10,000 Total Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 10,000 Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 11-Park-003 Project Name Playground Structure Replacement + t t ,iVr q„ Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Equipment Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $120,000 Play Structures are placed on a 20 year replacement pattern. Justification Valentine Park was up for replacement in 2010. This will be done in conjuction with the planned park improvements in 2011/2012. Perry Park is up for replacement in 2016. This structure was last replaced in 1996. Prior Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total F-60,0001 Construction/Maintenance 60,000 60,000 Total Total 60,000 60,000 Prior Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 60,000 capital Improvement Funds(PI 60,000 60,000 Total Total 60,000 60,000 Budget Impact/Other Replacement Part Costs Prior Budget Items 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 200 Maintenance of Parks and Trail -200 -200 -200 -200 -800 Total Total -200 w200 -200 •200 -800 Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Softtivare Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 11-Park-004 Project Name Forestry Implementation Plan Type Operational Maintenance Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $70,000 With the Emerald Ash Borer identified in St.Paul in the spring of 2009,the studies show that the beetles will move out at a rate of one to two miles per year. At that rate,the City could be completely infested in approximately 8-10 years. Staff budgeted for a complete City inventory in 2011 and now will need to have extra removal/replacement funds for the diseased trees. Justification The City will have impacts to the Forestry with the Emerald Ash Borer Treatment,Removal and Replacement on the horizon. Prior Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 35,000 I Construction/Maintenance 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 35,000 Total Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 35,000 Prior Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 35,000 I Capital Improvement Funds(PI 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 35,000 Total Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 35,000 Budget Impact/Other Removal and Replacement will be a large impact. An inventory of the City was budgeted for in 2011 to help determine the exact impacts. Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 11-Park-005 Project Name Park Amenities Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $20,000 Amenities such as picnic tables,benches,pavilion equipment needs. Justification Picnic tables,pavilion building needs and general park amenities. Picnic tables are always in need of replacement and as the pavilion buildings age,replacement needs will come up. The PTRC has a goal to look at trail signage for some of our remote trails. The recommendation is to utilize this funding for trail signage in 2012. Prior Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total F-8,0001 Construction/Maintenance 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 Total Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 Prior Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 8—,0 0-01 Capital Improvement Funds(PI 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 Total Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 Budget Impact/Other Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project 12-Park-002 Project Name Trail Rehabilitation Type Maintenance Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $250,000 The Public Works Department will be establishing a Trail Maintenance Program in 2011 for Council review. The trail system is being rated in 2011 and this data will help the staff put priorities on resurfacing and reconstructing of trails for the future. Justification The City has added multiple trails in the last few years. It will be crucial for the City to establish a Trail Maintenance Program and rehabilitate trails when needed. If trails are properly maintained,they will have an extended life. Prior Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 50,000 1 Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 Total Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 Prior Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total F___5_0_,00_0_1 Capital Improvement Funds(PI 50,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 170,000 Total Total 50,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 170,000 Budget Impact/Other Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 12-Park 003 ' Project Name Old Snelling Avenue Trail-Legacy Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $975,258 The City applied for a portion of funding from the State Legacy Grant for segments I1 and I2 from County Road E2 to Lake Johanna Boulevard (which connects to and from the CP Rail bridge pathway). The CP Rail Bridge improvements were completed in 2011. The estimated linear footage is 3,060 feet or.58 miles. Justification The PTRC has identified the enire corridor on Snelling Avenue in it's 2006 Strategies and 2030 Comp Plan as a priority. It is identified as a key north-south regional connection. This proposed trail is only segments I1 and I2. The Legacy Grant Program restrictions changed after the City applied,causing the project to NOT be eligible. This project may need to be delayed until alternative funding is found. Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Planning/Design 150,040 150,040 Construction/Maintenance 825,218 825,218 Total 975,258 975,258 Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Capital Improvement Funds(PI 475,258 475,258 Grant Revenue 500,000 500,000 Total 975,258 975,258 Budget Impact/Other Annual maintenance for the proposed trail is estimated at approximately$2.00 per linear foot at 3,060 feet. The estimate for this segment includes wetland dilineation,permitting,wetland credit purchase,board walking in flood plain areas and retaining walls. Budget Items 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Future Maintenance of Parks and Trail 6,000 6,000 88,000 Total 6,000 6,000 Total Produced Using the Plan-ft Capital Planning Softrvare Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project 0 13-Park-010 Project Name County Road E Trail Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Engineer Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $1,521,303 The project calls for construction of an 8 foot trail extending from the Cty Road E bridge over Hwy 51 to Old Highway 10. The City Council selected the north side for this trail when it was brought in for discussion. The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department agreed to participate in a cooperative trail all the way from the Cty Rd E bridge to Tony Schmidt Regional Park and the Elmer L.Andersen Memorial Trail. The overall project costs are estimated at$1,521,303. Below is the breakdown of costs: CONSTRUCTION-$1,156,791 total Federal Grant $925,433 City match-$159,497 County match-$71,861 ENGINEERING-$364,512 Total City-$242,190 County-$122,322 TOTAL LOCAL COST-after federal match City-$401,687 County-$194,183 Justification The Parks,Trails,and Recreation Committee identified this trail as a priority in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. If the bridge is put into the 2015 maintenace program,the City may choose to advance construct the bridge. The City applied for Transportation Enhancement Funding for the years 2015-2016 through Mn/DOT and the Met Council. This project may be delayed,depending on if the TE Grant is successful Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Planning/Design 96,587 121,463 121,462 339,512 Construction/Maintenance 1,156,791 1,156,791 Total 96,587 121,463 1,278,253 1,496,303 Funding Sources 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Capital Improvement Funds(PI 55,587 80,802 240,298 376,687 Grant Revenue 925,433 925,433 Ramsey Co Donation 194,183 194,183 Total 55,587 80,802 1,359,914 1,496,303 Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 lhru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Budget Impact/Other Yearly maintenance on this trail is estimated at$2 a linear foot. The sidewalk is 4,250 feet=$8,500 per year. Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Project# 14-Park-008 Project Name Snelling Avenue Regional Trail Type Improvement Department Parks Department Useful Life Contact Park&Recreation Mgr Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Description Total Project Cost: $1,500,000 Completion of Snelling Regional Trail-Segment I3 from County Road E2 to Highway 96. Completing segments I1 and I2 from County Road E to County Road E2 is estimated to cost$975,000. This is itemized on its own due to the City applying for Legacy Funding. To complete the rest of the I segment 3,from County Road E2 to Highway 96(going with the west side),it could be an additional$1.5 million dollars. The City could potentially seek federal funding assistance for this corridor. Segment 1: (51 to Cty Road E) -Identified in project 12-str-007 Segment I1 and I2: (Cty Rd E to Cty Rd E2)$975,000-Legacy Funding Application-Not included with this improvement as it was applied for on its own. Se meat I3: (Cty Rd E2 to Highway 96)$1,500,000 Justification The PTRC has identified this trail in it's 2006 Strategies as a priority. It is identified as a key north-south regional connection. The Snelling Avenue PMP reconstruction has currently no set date for reconstruction. That project may factor into when that portion of trail is constructed. Staff needs to continue to research the various funding possibilities. Expenditures 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Future Planning/Design 265,000 265,000 1,235,000 Total 265,000 265,000 Total Future 1,500,000 Total Budget Impact/Other Segment I3 from County Road E 2 to Highway 96 is 8,870 feet x$2,00 a linear foot=$17,740 (16,579 linear feet times$2 a foot for the entire corridor=$33,158. Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Thursday,April 12,2012 A ends Item 5B., Public Works/Parks and Recreation Report Ainl _Aendance Reports for 2011/2012 Season 2. Newsletter Article Sign Up Sheet 3. PTRC Work Plan for 2012 Mzalnu4- Trri C�h' G@an U � -j 2011/2012 ICE RINK USER TOTALS GENERAL HOCKEY BROOM- TOTALS PARK DATES Hours SKATERS SKATERS BALL LESSONS PER PARK Cumming s 12/21-2-18 336.00 242 6 0 145 393 Freeway 12/21-2-18 322.00 361 695 335 0 1,391 Hazelnut 12/21-2-18 332.00 311 744 233 18 1,306 Per 12/21-2-18 336.00 54 273 709 0 1,036 Valentine 12/21-2-18 326.00 273 91 0 0 364 Subtotal 1,652 1,241 1,809 1,277 163 4,490 General 1,241 Hockey 1,809 Broomball 1,277 Lessons 163 TOTAL 4,490 2008/2009 Total Days Open 2009/2010 Total Days Open Cummings 55 Cummings 73 Freeway 60 Freeway 73 Hazelnut 60 Hazelnut 73 Perry 60 Perry 73 Valentine 55 Valentine 69 Number of Number of users 4,769 users 5,606 2010/2011 Total Days Open 2011/2012 Total Days Open Cummings 64 Cummings 54 Freeway 63 Freeway 51 Hazelnut 64 Hazelnut 53 Perry 64 Perry 54 Valentine 64 Valentine 52 Number of Number of users 4,377 users 4,490 ICE RINK COMPARISON CHARTS Rink To RINK- Overall Attendance 2011-2012 Total Participants Average Use Average Use PARK Hours Open Days Open per rink Per Hour Per Day Cummings 336.00 54 393 0.97 7.28 Freeway 322.00 51_ 1,391 4.32 27.27 Hazelnut 332.00 53 1,306 3.93 24.64 Perry 336.00 54 1,036 3.08 19.19 Valentine 326.00 52 364 1.12 7.00 Subtotal _1,652 264 4,490 2.68 17.08 Year to Year Comparison Users per day per rink Avg. use per Avg.use per Rink Use+/- Days open in Days open in day in day in from 2010-2011 PARK 2010/2011 2011-2012 2010/2011 2011/2012 2011-2012 Cummings 64 54 5.53 7.28 1.75 Freeway 63 51 22.60 27.27 4.67 Hazelnut 64 53 20.72 24.64 3.92 Perry 64 54 14.22 19.19 4.97 Valentine 64 52 5.67 7.00 1.33 Avera a 1 64 1 53 1 13.75 1 17.08 1 3.33 Year to Year Comparison - Users per year per rink Days open in Days open in Users in Users in Rink Use+/- PARK 2010/2011 2011/2012 2010/2011 2011/2012 from 2010/2011 Cumming S 64 54 354 393 39.00 Freeway 63 54 1,424 1,391 33.00 Hazelnut 64 53 1,326 1,306 20.00 Perry 64 54 910 1,036 126.00 Valentine 64 52 363 364 1.00 TOTAL 1 1 4,377 1 4,490 1 113.00 • ARDEN HILLS NEWSLETTER ARTICLE PTRC WRITING ASSIGNMENTS MAY: �t VV� 1 article due: April 61n JUNE: article due: May 4tn JULY: article due: June 1st AUGUST: article due: July 6 SEPTEMBER: ``� ��Ma�1 article due: August 3'd OCTOBER: f ,n article due September 7tn • Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Workplan - 2012 ONGOING or AS NEEDED: 1. Recommend actions that advance the vision for parks, trails, and recreation. 2. Assist in identifying ongoing parks and trails maintenance/improvement priorities. 3. Recommend and review grant opportunities, sponsorships, and partnerships for parks and trails. 4. Assist, advise, and monitor plans for parks,trails and recreation within TCAAP at the appropriate time. 5. Continue to work with Ramsey County on mutually beneficial trail/park projects and activities. 6. Monitor potential road improvements to encourage inclusion of pedestrian friendly infrastructure whenever possible. 7. Look to enhance/add recreational opportunities in our parks. 8. Recommend future enhancements for the 5 year Capital Improvement Program each year. 9. Sponsor and organize Community events such as clean up day and buckthorn removal day(s). 10. Prepare monthly articles that the Committee would like to see highlighted in the City newsletter. JANUARY 1. Review and finalize goals and work plan 2. Prepare presentation for Council/PTRC Joint Work Session FEBRUARY: CITY COUNCIL/PTRC JOINT WORK SESSION 1. Review goals and work plan with Council 2. Discuss priorities MARCH: 1. Newsletter Article Assignments 2. Preliminary bench location discussion 3. Prepare for Clean Up Day at Tony Schmidt Park 4. Discuss Trail Signage Process moving forward APRIL 1. Ice Rink Season Review 2. 5 year CIP Preliminary Discussion 3. Review Trail Signage Design options 4. Recommend Trail Signage Locations 5. Finalize bench location recommendation 6. Dog Park Liability Issues 7. Participate and sponsor Clean Up Day at Tony Schmidt Park MAY 1. Trail Walk in City 2. Review Valentine Park Improvements 3. Trail Maintenance Plan Review 4. Dog Park Detail 5. 5 Year CIP Discussion DUNE 1. Park Tour 2. 5 Year CIP Review/Recommendation DULY 1. All Committee Barbeque AUGUST NO MEETING SCHEDULED SEPTEMBER 1. Discuss details of Clean up Day 2. Participate in Celebrating Arden Hills Festival 3. TBD OCTOBER 1. Review Recreation Activities and Statistics 2. Review Comprehensive Plan Goals/Plans NOVEMBER 1. Goal setting discussion for 2013 DECEMBER 1. Establish and recommend goals and work plan for 2013 Other Attachments: 1. Friends of the Parks and Trails 2012 Tree Sale Brochure 2. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes — January 11, 2012 3. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda— March 14, 2012 RAW C�I�NTY PARKi��►►ND R€ECEATIQN COMMEIESIE�N a E (p MINU(TES f ;` '(` - an E - X RAMSEY t NTY PARS A�NO R �REA ` North Va yKe Street �' Mapill [(. The regular meeting of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chair Pederson at 6:05 p.m., at Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, 2015 North Van Dyke Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. Members Present: Jack Ditmore, Deb Falkowski, Gale Pederson, Candy Petersen, Richard Straumann, Brian Tempas Members Absent: Phil Jenni, Sovatha Oum, Bryan Shirley Staff Present: Greg Mack, Jody Yungers APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Straumann moved, seconded by Mr. Tempas, that the agenda of the Parks and Recreation Commission be approved with the addition of the 2011 Commission Work Program overview that was added after election of Commission Chair and Vice Chair. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES .Chair Pederson asked for a motion to approve the minutes of December 14, 2011. Ms. Petersen, seconded by Mr. Straumann, that the minutes of December 14, 2011 be approved as mailed. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BY-LAWS Mr. Mack distributed copies of the Parks and Recreation Commission by-laws, noting that the Commission, by its enabling resolution, is required to annually approve its by- laws. Mr. Straumann moved, seconded by Mr. Tempas, that the Parks and Recreation Commission approve the 2012 by-laws. Motion carried. ELECTION OF COMMISSION CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Ms. Petersen nominated Ms. Pederson to serve as Chair for 2012. Hearing no additional nominations, Ms. Petersen moved, seconded by Mr. Ditmore, that nominations be closed and a unanimous ballot be cast for Ms. Pederson as Chair. Motion carried. Ms. Pederson nominated Mr. Straumann as Vice Chair for 2012. Hearing no additional nominations, Ms. Pederson, seconded by Mr. Ditmore, that nominations be closed and a unanimous ballot be cast for Mr. Straumann as Vice Chair. Motion carried. 2011 WORK PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS Mr. Mack distributed copies of the Commission 2011 Work Program. He noted that the Commission mission statement and philosophy/strategy was developed by the Commission as a preamble to the specific objectives included in the Work Program. Mr. Mack reviewed the status of each of the 2011 objectives noting that the majority had been accomplished or significant progress had been made toward completion. Many of the planning and development projects have proceeded on schedule and will be included in the Department work program for 2012 as contracts for these projects are implemented. A draft of the 2012 Commission Work Program will be presented for the Commission to consider at its next meeting. TAMARACK NATURE CENTER DISCOVERY HOLLOW EXPERIENCE + INTERPRETIVE PLAN Ms. Yungers led the Commission in a discussion regarding the plan that was prepared by RSP Dreambox. Commission members expressed support for the names recommended for each of the site areas and the messages that were proposed. The Commission was also supportive of the materials proposed for the various signs. Ms. Yungers indicated that the signs will be fabricated and installed in 2012 using funds from the Institute of Museum and Library Services grant that was awarded to Ramsey County for Tamarack Nature Center. Following a detailed discussion of the various plan elements, Mr. Tempas moved, seconded by Mr. Straumann, that the Commission recommend approval of the Tamarack Nature Center Discovery Hollow + Interpretive Plan. Motion carried. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mr. Mack provided an update on construction contracts that were awarded in 2011. He noted that the unusually warm weather has afforded contractors an opportunity to continue work through the end of the year including site preparation and some building construction at Turtle Lake County Park. The lack of snow has negatively impacted traditional winter outdoor recreation like cross-country skiing. Several cross-country ski events and activities have been canceled because of lack of snow. Mr. Mack reported that Department managers are involved in evaluation of the current Department organizational structure in an effort to address current and emerging needs. The organizational structure is intended to provide a vehicle for succession planning and identification of skill sets necessary for a sustainable organization. 2 ADJOURNMENT Upon appropriate motion, the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 pm. Respectfully submitted, Greg Mack 3 RAMSEY NOUN€ € PAR,KaE€ CI`R� fREATI11�GOMII3N€ { €' E €�t€(€€�EII Aff c t �€ - - c IE{I z €€� I€ �� `�E €€ � � � E M�F�"III�G � � E EE1-11 C € . a y s \ � r E ! f Zl N 2 -f11, � rS rtn YY ��ss E a?�°'�' 9i rs ;.%, �' E 5 E.c'a yy E 'u..€ p E(EE E y RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS,AND RECREATION 20i5 NORTH �ANQXKE STREET ! MAPLE W04D MN,55,ia9 1) CALL TO ORDER 2) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF 3ANUARY 11, 2012 4) OVERVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 2012 WORK PROGRAM 5) 2012 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION WORK PLAN (DRAFT ATTACHED) 6) PRESENTATION OF KELLER GOLF COURSE AND CLUBHOUSE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PLANS 7) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE SNAIL LAKE MARSH DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE HIGHWAY 96 REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN 8) DIRECTOR'S REPORT 9) REPORT FROM CHAIR AND OTHER COMMISSION MEMBERS 10) ADJOURNMENT 1