Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-11-R EN HILLS Approved: June 1, 2011 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 25,2011 7:00 P.M. -ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Ed Werner and Nicholas Tamble. Absent: None. Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; City Attorney Jerry Filla; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; Civil Engineer Kristine Giga; City Planner Meagan Beekman; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; and Recording Secretary Tina Borg. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested Item 4G be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as Item 5A. Councilmember Holden requested the discussion and motion on the Comprehensive Plan that is part of Item 8C be moved to Item 7A. Councilmember Holmes requested Item 4F be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as Item 5B. Councilmember Tamble requested Item 41) be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as Item 5C. Councilmember Tamble requested Item 4I be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as Item 5D. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve the A ends as amended. The motion carried unanimous) ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 2 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL A. TCAAP and Stadium Proposal Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher stated Senate File 1164 was introduced on Monday, April 11, 2011. This bill establishes a site selection process, authorizes local and state funding for a multi-purpose stadium, sets parameters for stadium use and development, and defines local authority in the planning and development process. No hearings have been held on the bill. The legislative session, which is currently on Easter break, will resume on Tuesday, April 26. Ramsey County has negotiated a postponement of the public auction of the TCAAP site with the General Services Administration (GSA). The postponement allows Ramsey County time to determine whether a stadium development is feasible. If a stadium development on the TCAAP site were to move forward, it is likely that the property would be transferred through a negotiated sale. Ramsey County continues to meet with the Minnesota Vikings to discuss the stadium proposal. The County and the team are focusing on identifying needed improvements to the transportation infrastructure and the estimated cost of those improvements. B. Spring Cleanup Proposal City Planner Meagan Beckman stated this year's Spring Cleanup Day will be held at the Ramsey County Public Works Department on Hamline Avenue and Highway 96 on May 7, 2011, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Full details are available on the City's website and were included in _ the April edition of the City Newsletter, Arden Hills Notes. Residents can also contact City Hall for information. Roseville will also be selling rain barrels and compost bins on May 7 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Roseville City Hall. PUBLIC Mayor Grant opened the Public Inquiries/Informational at 7:07 p.m. Mr. David Bartlett, 4503 Keithson Drive, Arden Hills, stated the residents of Keithson Drive are in favor of the dual cul-de-sac option proposed by Pulte Group. The traffic studies indicated a cul- de-sac would not have significant impacts on Colleen Avenue or Arden View Drive. He stated there are 13 cul-de-sacs in a one mile stretch of road along County Road 96 and adding two more cut-de-sacs would be maintaining the character of the area. Mr. Ron Nelson, 4504 Keithson Drive, Arden Hills, stated that the neighbors have three objections to the Fox Ridge proposal; making Keithson Drive a through street, they would like to maintain a 40-foot setback for Mr. Bartlett's property, and they would like to have Lot 18 eliminated from the proposal. Pulte has met with the neighborhood and has provided a win-win proposal for keeping Keithson Drive separate by adding two cul-de-sacs. These cul-de-sacs are compliant with the City's codes and allow for a 40-foot setback for the Bartlett property. He stated the City would have no basis for challenging the dual cul-de-sac option. He stated he was not happy that Lot 18, Block 4, was still a part of the development. This lot will have water problems in the future that may affect his property and it will also affect his market value. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 3 2. Public Inquiries/Informational (continued) Mr. Dave McClung, 4370 Snelling Avenue North, Arden Hills, stated there is precedent in the City for cul-de-sacs that enter on busy roads. Councilmember Holden asked how many of the cul-de-sacs Mr. Bartlett is referencing that empty onto a major street or County Road. Mayor Grant closed the Public Inquiries/Informational at 7:17 p.m. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. April 11,2011,Regular City Council Meeting MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to Approve the April 11, 2011, Regular City Council MectinL-Minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR - A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item—Claims and Payroll.B. Motion to Accept the Resignation of Elizabeth Modesette From the Planning Commission. C. Motion to Accept the Resignation of Daniel Reiff From the Planning Commission. to Natufal Shere Teehnalegies, of Plain, ra n � =c�uzrr�zr�xxmc�rrcrr,-ir trca��c-vx E. Motion to Adopt Resolution 2011-020: Accepting a Metropolitan Council Environmental Service Inflow and Infiltration Grant and Designating the Public Works Director as the Authorized Representative for the Project. seek loiters of s",.,eA fr-e r, large n,.,7e Hills , ....1,.yer-. H. Authorize the Purchase of a Ford One Ton Chassis From Midway Ford and the Outfitting of the Chassis with a Lift Box and Plow at Truck Utilities for a Total Not to Exceed$67,000. Authorize the 2000 Ford One-Ton to Be Sent to Auction Once the City Receives Delivery of the New Vehicle. Casts v4th 1441 Capital StFeAegies, !no. far-a Total Gentraet Cost Not te Exeee $1-3;2080 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Werner seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 4 5. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Adopt 2012 Budget Calendar as Presented Councilmember Holden stated the proposed Budget Calendar shows the City Council approving budget instructions and parameters on April 25, 2011. She stated there were no instructions or parameters included in the memo. She asked when the Council would have the opportunity to supply input to Staff for the budget. City Administrator Patrick Klaers stated the proposed budget calendar is similar to the one presented to the Council in previous years. The budget calendar includes the budget instructions and parameters. The City Council will have an opportunity to provide input at a work session in May or June. Once the calendar is approved Staff will begin the preparation of the budget. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to have the budget discussions on the May 16 work session agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to Ado t the 2012 Bud et Calendar with the Addition of the May 16 2011 Work Session. The motion carried unanimously 5-0 . C. Motion to Approve the Letter of Support for House File 118 and authorize Staff to seek letters of support from large Arden Hills employers. Councilmember Holmes stated it has not been the practice of the City Council to provide letters of support for projects outside of the City. This particular project does not benefit the City of Arden Hills. The bill was not introduced by Arden Hills State Representatives and she would like to know what their input is regarding this particular project. She asked why the project stops before coming into Arden Hills. Councilmember Holden asked what Representative Knuth and Senator Goodwin had to say in regards to this project. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated this project would benefit those Arden Hills residents who work in St. Paul or those individuals who are employed by Arden Hills businesses. This project would promote economic development within Arden Hills. At this time she did not know the positions for Representative Knuth and Senator Goodwin on this particular project. The TH 51/I-694 project will address the road area between TH 51 and Lexington. Councilmember Holmes stated Mn/DOT has stated the TH 51/1-694 improvements would not alleviate traffic but would be more of a safety improvement. She would not be in favor of the City supporting this project. Councilmember Holden asked if there were any proposals to make improvements on the bridge that goes over I-694 on Rice Street. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated this is part of what is being requested with this proposal. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 5 S.B. Motion to Approve the Letter of Supportfor House File 118 and authorize Staff to seek letters of support from large Arden Hills employers. (continued) - Mayor Grant stated he would support this particular project. The City does not generally endorse various positions but it is important for the growth of the region. He clarified that he would have liked to known what Representative Knuth and Senator Goodwin had to say about the project. There is forward momentum for $56 million in transportation improvements in the northern region. Councilmember Werner stated he would like to know who the Senate authors are and if there are any companions to this proposal. Councilmember Holmes stated the bill is dated January 18 and the amount on the bill does not match the project dollars they are requesting at this time. The bill does not support the Resolution. - Community Development Director Hutmacher clarified House File 118, which is requesting $1.2 million, was essentially a placeholder to allow the bill to be considered as part of a State Bonding bill and allow for further research into the project. This is the first step in a long process for this project. Councilmember Werner stated planning and design are the first steps in the bonding process. Once the project receives pre-design money it will likely get built. Representative Knuth and _ Senator Goodwin could sign onto this bill if they are asked and they support it. Typically a bill can have 5 authors in the Senate and 35 authors in the House. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Tamble seconded a motion to Approve the Letter of Support for House File 118 and Authorize Staff to Seek Letters of Support From Large Arden Hills Employers. The motion carried 3-2• Councilmembers Holmes and Holden). C. Award the Indian Oaks Court Pond Shoreline Restoration and Landscaping Project to Natural Shore Technologies,Inc., of Maple Plain, Minnesota, in the Amount of$14,037.20 Councilmember Tamble asked Civil Engineer Giga to explain where the money is being used along the shoreline and why dredging this pond was not enough. Civil Engineer Kristine Giga stated the pond maintenance is being completed in three phases, each with separate construction contracts: dredging pond sediments, shoreline restoration and landscaping, and replacement of the pond's outlet pipe. Residents around the pond approached Ramsey County Conservation District to do shoreline restoration to stabilize the shoreline. The residents approached the City regarding an in-kind contribution for this project. The City indicated their support for the shoreline restoration but also acknowledging the pond needed to be dredged. The residents initiated the shoreline restoration portion of the project in order to stabilize the shoreline. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 6 5.C. Award the Indian Oaks Court Pond Shoreline Restoration and Landscaping Project to Natural Shore Technologies, Inc., of Maple Plain, Minnesota, in the Amount of $14,037.20 (continued) Councilmember Tamble clarified this is for natural vegetation and plant material and does not include retaining walls. Civil Engineer Giga stated this was correct. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Tamble seconded a motion to Award the Indian Oaks Court Pond Shoreline Restoration and Landsca in Project to Natural Shore Technologies, Inc. of Maple Plain, Minnesota, In the Amount of$14 037.20. The motion carried unanimously 5-0 . D. Motion to Approve up to an Additional$6,000 in Expenditures for Contract Costs with Hill Capital Strategies,Inc. for a total contract cost not to exceed $13,200. Councilmember Tamble stated there has been inactivity with the stadium proposal and he questioned the need for spending additional funds on this relationship. He stated he would like to cease this relationship. This is not the best use of City funds. He added that the updates the City Council has been receiving are coming from newspaper articles that are readily available. He - asked what the City has gained from this contract. City Administrator Klaers stated the City entered into the relationship when the talks about a potential stadium had just started and the City became aware of the County's plans. Staff does not have the time or expertise to be at the legislative session to be sure the City's interests are being addressed. There have not been a lot of updates recently due to the inactivity of the bill,but in the future, as the bill progresses, the City would be kept up to date on the status of the bill. The City could rely on the County to provide updates to the City as well. Councilmember Holden stated the contract with Hill Capital Strategies is to protect the City if the legislation moves forward so that the City would have an opportunity to add items that would protect the City. After it is decided that the stadium will be built on the TCAAP property, then it will be out of the control of Arden Hills. City Administrator Klaers stated even if Arden Hills no longer controls the TCAAP property from a land use and zoning aspect, there are still issues that would need to be raised and discussed to ensure the City is protecting itself and its residents. Councilmember Werner stated Mr. Hill has a good reputation and is a well-connected Iobbyist. Since the City has already invested with Mr. Hill, he stated he would reluctantly support continuing this relationship. Mayor Grant stated Staff would need to show the value of this relationship more than has been shown to date. Councilmember Holden asked if Staff felt more confident receiving information from Ramsey County or with continuing to work with Mr. Hill. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 7 S.D. Approval for Additional Expenditures for Hill Capital Strategies, Inc. (continued) City Administrator Klaers stated that he had faith in Ramsey County but felt the relationship with Mr. Hill would be beneficial to the City's interests in the future. Councilmember Holmes stated the disadvantage of not continuing to work with Mr. Hill is if the discussions progress on the stadium the City will have no one there. Councilmember Tamble asked where the impact of having someone to represent the City was and what would Mr. Hill be doing for the City that the City could not do for itself. City Administrator Klaers stated Mr. Hill is well connected and would have access to relationships that may be beneficial that the City does not have. The City would also not have access to any information before it is public knowledge. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to see the City have a person on the Sports Commission once that is established to ensure the City has representation and Mr. Hill may be able to make this happen for the City. Mayor Grant stated he would like to see more results from Mr. Hill. He also stated he understood there was not a lot to report since there was not a lot of activity at this time. He clarified that at this time their relationship with Mr. Hill is more of an insurance policy and the City does not want to be caught in a situation that it is not prepared for. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Homes seconded a motion to Approve up to an additional $5 000 in Expenditures for Contract Costs with Hill Capital Strategies, Inc. For a Total Contract Cost Not To Exceed $13 200. The motion carried 4-1• Councilmember Tamble . 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2011 PMP Special Assessment Hearing, Resolution 2011-021 and Resolution 2011-022 Civil Engineer Giga stated on January 31, 2011, the City Council approved the plans and specifications for the 2011 Pavement Management Program (PMP) and ordered advertisement for bids. Bids were opened on Tuesday, March 8, 2011. A portion of the costs for the 2011 PMP project are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties. In order to assess these costs the City must follow the Public Hearing steps outlined in State Statute 429. On March 14, 2011, the City Council set April 25, 2011, as the date to hold the public hearing for the purpose of establishing special assessments for the 2011 PMP Improvements. Following the assessment hearing, the next step in the process is to adopt the assessment roll. The assessment roll may be adopted as proposed, or with amendments as made by the City Council. If the Council adopts the assessment roll and chooses to move forward with the project, action to award the bid is needed. The low bid submitted by Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation (Astech Corporation) is 16% lower than the Engineer's construction estimate. Staff recommends moving forward with the project. The project is proposed to be assessed consistent with the City's assessment policy ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 8 6.A. 2011 PMP Special Assessment Hearing, Resolution 2011-021 and Resolution 2011-022 (continued) which states that 50% of the costs for roadway improvements will be assessed in residential areas, with the remaining portion financed by various City funds. Single-family units are proposed to be _ assessed $2,813.86 per unit and multi-family units are proposed to be assessed $592.21 per unit. As discussed at the public hearing and as was prepared in the feasibility report, the proposed assessments were based on the contractor's bid prices. At the March 14, 2011, City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to set the payment period of the assessment to 7 years. The interest rate was set at 4.4%, which is 2% over the current annualized rate of return on the City's portfolio. This is a deviation from the assessment policy which states the interest rate shall be prime rate plus 2%; this would mean a rate of 5.25%. To date, no formal objections have been submitted in writing to City Staff. As stated in Minnesota State Statute, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the affected property owners is filed with the City at or prior to the assessment hearing. After the adoption of - the assessment roll, property owners have 30 days to serve notice of an appeal to the City, and 10 days after serving notice to file with the district court. Staff did receive a request to extend the interest free period to allow property owners some additional time to plan and budget their payment. The City Attorney indicated that the 30-day payment period is the minimum period that - is required by State Statute for interest free payments and can be extended at the City Council's direction. The City Attorney recommended that if extended, the interest free period should end - prior to the certification of the assessment roll to the County in October. Mayor Grant asked why the amount for the surface water improvements was so much higher than the estimates. Civil Engineer Giga stated this project needs to have a Rice Creek Watershed permit. The rules are not clear in all aspects and when working with Rice Creek Watershed, their intent with the rules has increased the requirements the City needs to meet. The City has applied for cost-sharing dollars with Rice Creek Watershed District but the City has not heard back regarding this application. Mayor Grant stated that water improvements are needed for this project. He stated the City is replacing gate valves. He asked if the City uses gate valves or ball valves. Public Works Director Terry Maurer stated the gate valves are used and have been dependable. The City has not had significant failure with the valve itself but rather with the weakening of the bolts and leaking of the joints. Mayor Grant stated he had also received the e-mail regarding the prepayment period. He asked when the City would be expected to start making payments for this project. Civil Engineer Giga stated if the bid were awarded at this meeting, construction would start in June. The City would start making payments 30 days after the start of the project and this would be mid-July to late July. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 9 6.A. 2011 PMP Special Assessment Heating, Resolution 2011-021 and Resolution 2011-022 (continued) Mayor Grant stated the City has the ability to extend the prepayment period. Having more time to pay the assessment would not only help residents but would help the City as well. He asked City Attorney Filla to explain the appeal process. City Attorney Jerry Filla stated a written objection must be received before the end of the meeting tonight in order to reserve the right to appeal. The resident then has 30 days after the assessment roll is adopted to appeal the City Council decision to the District Court. This would by done by service to the Mayor or City Administrator at City Hall. Once the City has been served the resident has 10 days to file with the District Court. Councilmember Holden questioned the plan for the cul-de-sac at the townhomes. Public Works Director Maurer stated the Nursery Hill cul-de-sac would either have a rain garden located in the center of the cul-de-sac or the amount of blacktop would be lessened in order to accommodate the rain gardens in the boulevards. Civil Engineer Giga stated the shape of the cul-de-sac at Arden View Court would be redesigned to improve trucks being able to get around. An infiltration basin is also proposed at this location. - Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. Councilmember Holden stated the contract amount is considerably less than the feasibility report estimates were for this project. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Adopt Resolution 2011-021: Adoptine, the Special Assessment Roll for the 2011 Pavement Management Program. Councilmember Hoiden stated she would like to extend the interest-free period to July 15. Councilmember Tamble stated he would support extending this as well. Councilmember Holmes clarified that residents could still pay the assessment early even if they do not pay by the July 15 or July 25 date. The interest free period would be set at either July 15 or July 25 but residents had until October to pay the assessment with interest. Mayor Grant stated he would like to set the interest-free period to July 15 since the City could have a payment due on the project by mid-July. Councilmember Holmes asked if this extension was being done due to the poor economy or if the City needed to review the assessment policy for potential changes. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 10 6.A. 2011 PMP Special Assessment Hearing, Resolution 2011-021 and Resolution 2011-022 (continued) - Councilmember Holden stated the extension is being considered due to the poor economy at this time. This will give residents more time to budget for the assessment and potentially not pay additional interest. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Tamble seconded a motion to Amend Resolution 2011-021 Para rah 4 the First Sentence to Read: "The owner of any property so assessed may, at any, time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, a the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of„payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before July 26 2011." The motion carried unanimous) 5-0 . - The amended motion to Approve Resolution 2011-21 was called to a vote. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). - MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a - motion to Adopt Resolution_2011-022: Awarding the Bid for the 2011 Pavement Management Program to Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation of St. CIoud Minnesota in an Amount of$1 056 476.80. Councilmember Holden asked if residents would know who to contact at the City if they have concerns about the project. Public Works Director Maurer stated information will be going out in the PMP newsletter and there will be several contacts for residents. Councilmember Holden stated the project will only be doing the City streets at the townhomes. She asked how this would blend with the roads from the townhouses. Public Works Director Maurer stated the project would only do the City streets and the connections to the townhouse roads will be repaired if impacted by the project. The motion was called to a vote. The motion carried unanimous) 5-0 . 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 11 7.A. Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential (continued) City Planner Beekman stated the applicant has a purchase agreement for 25.4 acres of undeveloped land on the southeast corner of Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue N. The property is zoned Rl, single-family residential, and is guided for Low Density Residential in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the property to allow for single-family homes. Through early discussions with the developer it became clear that there is a conflict between the City's Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan in regards to the required density of R-1 property in the City. The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the future land use of the property as Low Density Residential, which is defined as residential property developed at three to five units per net acre. In contrast, the City's Zoning Code caps the allowed density in the R-1 District at three units per net acre. Furthermore, the Code requires a minimum. of 14,000 square feet per R-1 lot, which does not allow for a density of three units per net acre. If the applicant develops the property in accordance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, they would need a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to allow less than three units per acre. In contrast, if the property were developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan requirements at a higher density, flexibility from the City's Zoning Code would be necessary. At the January 31, 2011,work session with the City Council, Pulte Group presented two concept plan scenarios; one at a higher density option that met the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan,and a second lower density option that met the requirements of the Zoning Code. The City Council gave direction that the lower density option was preferred, and Pulte Group has since _ moved forward with preparing a development application package in line with this direction. If the City approves the CPA, it will be contingent on approval from the Metropolitan Council. Councilmember Holden asked if the Met Council required a density of 3 units per acre or higher. City Planner Beekman stated the Met Council prefers a minimum density of 3 or more units per acre for new development. They want the City to have an average density of 3 units per acre and the City does meet this even with the proposed Fox Ridge development. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to be sure that if Pulte decides to pull out of the project the amendment is still approved because the City needs to rectify the difference in the City Code and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. City Planner Beekman stated the motion being presented at this time was to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and to reclassify the property as Very Low Density Residential. Even if Pulte Group decides not to do this project it is necessary to bring the Comp Plan and Zoning Code in line. By amending the Comprehensive Plan the City is eliminating discrepancies presented by the City's Zoning Code and the 2030 Comprehensive PIan regarding the density for the R-1 District. Councilmember Holmes asked if all of the R-1 District would need to be reclassified as Very Low Density Residential or if there would be two R-I Districts now. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 12 ?.A. Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential (continued) City Planner Beekman clarified the Very Low Density Residential was a classification that would be used for only the undeveloped property that is being proposed. The City may choose to use this classification in other areas of the City in the future. The classification is for the Comprehensive Plan only and has no impact on the City's Zoning Districts. There is no point to reclassifying developed land. The District Requirement Chart in the zoning code could be changed to 2.3 units per acre. The City's Code is not inaccurate because it states a density "up to 3 units per acre". The property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North can not have 3 or more units per acre on it due to the buildable lot size requirements in the City Code but it still meets the "up to 3 units per acre." Councilmember Holden asked if the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment would remain in place even if the planning case were not approved. City Planner Beekman stated at this time the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is part of a specific planning case. If the City chose to amend the Comprehensive Plan separately then the process will need to be initiated by the City. City Attorney Filla stated the Council could choose to change the first motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan only making it a separate motion to approve the planning case preliminary _ plat. MOTION: CounciImember Holden moved and CounciImember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential. City Planner Beekman stated the applicant is not interested in moving forward with the application if the preliminary plat is separated from the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Ian Peterson, VP Pulte Homes, stated the preliminary plat is the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and should not be considered separately. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved and the preliminary plat is not, this could have financial implications for the owner of the property and he is not in attendance to explain how this could further affect him and his ability to either resell or develop the property in the future. City Attorney Filla explained that this discussion could take place as part of Item 8C and the City could still choose to deny the preliminary plat, but approve the Comp Plan Amendment. Councilmember Holden asked what the maximum number of buildable units would be on this acreage. City Planner Beekman stated there are 20-acres of net buildable area and under the current guiding plan 60 to 100 units could be built on the property. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 13 7.A. Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential (continued) City Attorney Filla suggested the motion be moved to be included with item 8C because the person most impacted by the reclassification of the property is not in attendance Councilmember Holden withdrew her motion. Councilmember Holmes withdrew her second to the motion. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to Suspend the Rules for the Purpose of AlterinjZ the Agenda to Move_Item 7A to be Included with Item. 8C. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Hazelnut Purchase Agreement—Final Approval Community Development Director Hutmacher stated Trinity Lutheran Church, located at 3245 New Brighton Road, is a four-and-a-half-acre parcel surrounded on two sides by Hazelnut Park, a City-owned property. In 2009, the Church approached the City to discuss the sale of a portion of the Church property, which the City has used for a soccer field. The City Council reviewed the _ proposal at two work sessions in 2010 and directed Staff to move forward with the acquisition of approximately 71,000 square feet at a purchase price of $3.00 per square foot. The land area proposed includes the trail entrance to the park, soccer field, and the park identification sign. In addition to the sale of the land, the Church has agreed to formalize a Joint Use Agreement which will be recorded against the property, ensuring designated park parking into the future. In addition to the City Council, the Financial Planning and Analysis Committee and the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee have reviewed the proposal and recommended that the City move forward with a purchase if an acceptable purchase price could be negotiated. At the January 31, 2011, work session, the Council reviewed the draft Purchase and Joint Use Agreements for the Hazelnut Park acquisition and directed Staff to proceed with finalizing the Purchase Agreement for 71,474 square feet of land at $3.00 per square foot from Trinity Lutheran Church. The closing date has been postponed until June 29, 2011. Ms. Hutmacher outlined the proposed Purchase Agreement and Maintenance Agreement changes since the January 31, 2011,work session. Councilmember Holden stated the City is purchasing this property for the purpose of expanding the City's parks. She asked if it could be written into the purchase agreement or a different document to ensure this property remains parkland. City Attorney Filla stated the City would have the title for this property and this Council or future Councils could choose to do something different with the land. Councilmember Holden asked for clarification on who would be responsible for determining what potholes would be filled. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 14 8.A. Hazelnut Purchase Agreement—Final Approval (continued) Public Works Director Maurer stated the City will determine what potholes are appropriate to be filled but the City would not be rebuilding the parking lot one pothole at a time. Mayor Grant asked if the parking lot were repaved if the City would pay a portion of this based on the City's use of the parking lot. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated the allocation of future construction costs has not yet been determined. Councilmember Holmes stated a Phase 1 environmental assessment is included in the purchase agreement. She asked if there was any guarantee that there were no hazardous materials on the property or if the City could back out of the purchase agreement if hazardous materials were found. City Attorney Filla stated if hazardous materials were found on the property the City would have the option to not move forward with the purchase and this is covered under Section S of the Purchase Agreement. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to - Approve the Purchase Agreement, Joint Use Agreement, and Maintenance Agreement as Presented for the Hazelnut Park Acquisition. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). B. Planning Case 11-0055—Trinity Lutheran Church Preliminary and Final Plat and Master and Final Planned Unit Development(PUD) City Planner Beekman stated Trinity Lutheran Church is zoned R-2. The Church and the City of Arden Hills are in the process of negotiating a purchase agreement for the sale of a 71,474 square- foot section of land that would be subdivided from the Church's existing property. This subdivided parcel would be consolidated with Hazelnut Park and maintained as parkland for the public (Lot 2). The eastern portion would remain under the Church's ownership (Lot 1). Located within the parcel currently owned by Trinity Lutheran Church is a congregation hall, parking lot, soccer field, identification sign for Hazelnut Park, and trail entrance to the park. The City has had a contract with the Church for the shared use of the parking lot, which acts as the only designated parking for Hazelnut Park, in exchange for $1,000 per year in shared snow plowing expenses. In addition, the City restripes the parking lot after it has been seal coated as well as provides repairs as needed. The application consists of four components: a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, and Final PUD. The Preliminary Plat is necessary to subdivide the property and file the subdivision with the County recorder. Subdividing the current parcel into the two proposed lots would cause the Church's remaining property to become non-conforming within the R-2 District since it would reduce the required amount of landscaped coverage on their parcel. Therefore, the applicant must receive a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to proceed with the subdivision and allow for the reduction of landscaped coverage. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their April 6 meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the subdivision and PUD. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 15 8.B. Planning Case 11-0055 — Trinity Lutheran Church Preliminary and Final Plat and Master and Final PUD (continued) - Councilmember Holden asked if the Church would be out of conformance with the City green space requirements if it were to be redeveloped. City Planner Beekman stated approval of the proposed PUD would grant them the required reduction in green space. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve Plannine Case 11-005 for a Preliminary and Final Plat and Master and Final PUD to Subdivide the Property at 3245 New Brighton Road Into Two Parcels Based on the Findings of Fact, The Submitted Plans, and the Conditions in the April 25 2011 Memo to the City Council. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and Preliminary Plat City Planner Beekman stated the applicants are requesting approval to subdivide the property into 39 single-family lots. The proposed plan would comply with the required Zoning Code and - Subdivision standards for the R-1 District. The plan also includes three access points; Snelling Avenue to the west, Keithson Drive to the east, and Arden View Drive to the south. Pulte Group _ hosted a community meeting on February S, 2011, to discuss the lower density proposed concept plan with residents around the development area. Pulte Group has since held a second meeting with Keithson Drive residents on April 15 and discussed the option of not connecting to Keithson Drive. The applicants reviewed the option and have found that it could be feasible; however, it would require greater tree loss. If the Council determines that the dual cul-de-sac option is preferred, a more detailed review could be done at the time of Final Plat review. Staff continues to prefer the through-street option. If the City approves the CPA, it will be contingent on approval from the Metropolitan Council. The City contracted with SRF Consulting to perform a traffic study for the proposed development. SRF looked at two transportation alternatives, one without a connection to Keithson and one with. SRF found that there are no significant traffic impacts expected due to the proposed development. Councilmember Tamble recognized the diligence of the Keithson Drive residents and the accommodations made by Pulte Homes in response to their concerns. He stated he would like to know the benefits of having a cul-de-sac versus the benefits of having a through road at Keithson Drive. City Planner Beckman stated the Planning Commission and Staff prefer the through-street. The City's regulations support connectivity, discourage creating lots with two street frontages, and require that adjacent road stubs connect as new development occurs. Snow plowing, utility access and maintenance is better and more efficient if the connection is there. The Fire Marshal believes that the connection will increase public safety and make access to the development more efficient. From a traffic and transportation standpoint, having additional road connections is preferred to having fewer; it increases connectivity and allows vehicles to distribute more evenly and reduces ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 16 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat(continued) traffic impacts overall. The connection would also give the residents on Keithson Drive an alternative exit point to avoid Highway 96 if desired. Councilmember Tamble asked if homes with two frontages would be double assessed for road improvements. City Planner Beekman stated the assessment policy would address this but it is usually clear what street is considered to be the main access for a home and only one assessment would be made. Councilmember Tamble asked if the 40-foot setback could be maintained on Mr. Bartlett's property with the through street. City Planner Beekman stated the property Iine on Mr. Bartlett's property is 10-feet from the main structure and the only way to get the full 40-foot setback is to move the property line. The way the plans are, the edge of the road would be 35 feet from his home. The option to move the road slightly to the south has not been examined but may impact the wetlands. City Attorney Filla stated Mr. Bartlett's property would become a non-conforming lot. This would not be a self-created situation and variance options would depend on what was being requested; however the City would be inclined to grant a future variance if one was applied for. Councilmember Holmes asked if the connection with Keithson Drive would create an intersection. Public Works Director Maurer stated this would create a 2-legged street intersection because it is not a deflection. Councilmember Holden stated there had been issues concerning drainage brought forward at the Planning Commission meeting. She asked if these concerns had been reviewed. Public Works Director Maurer stated the submitted concept plan covers the drainage and Rice Creek Watershed is reviewing this. The City will need to review the construction plans to know how individual lots will be graded. The developer is aware of the drainage issues and what will need to be done to address these issues. The City can ensure these lots are built according to submitted and approved plans through construction observation by Staff and Inspectors. Councilmember Holden stated the wetland areas exceeded their borders this year. She asked how the City would know the water would stay in the proper areas. Public Works Director Maurer stated a certified wetland delineator had been to the site and determined the wetland boundaries. These are wetland experts and the City needs to accept their work as being accurate and reliable. He stated the development will need to properly manage all the drainage from this development as well as the drainage that comes in from the surrounding ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 17 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat (continued) - neighborhoods. The drainage plans have been prepared by an expert in determining the proper way to grade to make drainage effective. It will be up to the developer to build according to the approved drainage plans. City Attorney Filla stated the City needed to rely on the experts that have been hired to address the drainage. Councilmember Werner asked what the objections were to the dual cul-de-sac that is being requested by the residents of Keithson Road. City Planner Beekman stated the Fire Marshal believes that the connection will increase public safety and make access to the development more efficient. From a traffic and transportation standpoint, having additional road connections increases connectivity, allows vehicles to distribute more evenly, and reduces traffic impacts overall. The addition of the two cut-de-sacs versus the through-street would result in additional tree loss. Public Works Director Maurer stated snow plowing, utility access and maintenance is better and more efficient if the connection is there. The connection would also give the residents on Keithson Drive an alternative exit point to avoid Highway 96. There are potential safety issues that could arise by having Highway 96 the only access to Keithson Drive. The County may decide in the future to shut the median opening on Highway 96. Councilmembcr Holden asked if the residents on Keithson Drive had a reasonable expectation that this road would become a through street. City Planner Beekman stated Keithson Drive was always expected to be a through-street once the other property was developed. She could not say for sure what the residents knew but the City has always anticipated that it would eventually connect. That is why there is no cul-de-sac now. Councilmember Werner clarified the Keithson properties were developed before wetland legislation had been enacted. Public Works Director Maurer stated this was correct. Now wetland agencies are expecting developers to avoid, minimize, and mitigate when it comes to wetlands. Developers are no longer able to fill in wetlands to make a buildable lot. Mayor Grant stated the grade separation on Highway 10 and County Road 96 could make this route more desirable. This would increase traffic on this road and make it more problematic for the residents of Keithson Drive to access their homes Public Works Director Maurer stated the grade separation would also decrease the openings in traffic that are created by the traffic lights and this could make the access point of Keithson Drive a dangerous intersection. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 18 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat(continued) - Councilmember Holmes stated Lot 10 on Block 1 has a section of property that is in between two other homes. This piece of land is not large enough to build a home on but is large enough for the property owner to build a shed or secondary garage. This would then be located between two homes. She asked if this had been discussed with the developer. City Planner Beekman stated the land exists and there is really nothing that can be done with it. The applicants may choose to sell this piece of property to the adjacent landowners in a private sale. This would not involve the City. Councilmember Tamble asked what the home values are for homes on a cul-de-sac versus those on through streets. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to extend the meeting to 11:00 p.m. The motion carried unanimous) 5-0 . Mr. Peterson stated the lot values are based on the ability of the home to have a full walk-out - basement or not. A home with a full walk-out basement and on a cul-de-sac end could be as much as $10,000 more. Homes without a walk-out basement and on a cul-de-sac may be worth $3,000 more than those located on a through-street. Councilmember Holmes stated Lot 10, Block 1 has several trees on the portion of land that is between the adjacent lots. She asked if this section of land could be part of the park dedication fee. City Planner Beekman stated the City Council has the discretion to determine the park dedication fee and can use it for conservation. This would come out of the cash fees that are being proposed at this time. The decision and negotiation to sell this property would be private and the City would not get involved. There is no apparent way to solve the issue with this piece of property. Councilmember Holden clarified some screening would be provided by the developer but the future homeowners may decide in the future to remove these trees. She suggested that those residents concerned about screening to plant their own trees as well. Mayor Grant stated there was a section of the property that was delineated and impacted the wetlands. He asked how this was being mitigated. City Planner Beckman stated due to the size it would be exempt from mitigation. The Rice Creek Watershed has approved this. Councilmember Holmes asked what bonds are included with this project. City Planner Beckman explained there were two sureties: one for the landscaping and one for the right-of-way and utility improvements. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 19 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat (continued) - Public Works Director Maurer stated that he has also recommended to City Planner Beekman the City obtain a 100% letter of credit for the improvements on the site including the grading, utilities, and street construction. Councilmember Holden asked how the construction traffic on Arden View Drive would affect the Pavement Management Project that would be starting in June. Public Works Director Maurer stated one of the conditions of approval is that no construction traffic is allowed to access the property except from Snelling Avenue. Construction vehicles will be able to access those lots that are located on Arden View Drive by the use of this road. The section of Arden View Drive that would be used for this development is not included in the pavement management project. Councilmember Holden asked for additional information on the Home Owners Association (HOA) and how it worked especially in regards to maintaining the retaining walls and the grading. Mr. Peterson stated the Home Owners Association is established and governed by Minnesota State Statutes. Every year they have an annual audit. Fees for HOAs are based on replacement - reserves, which are calculated out through the course of time. Every quarter each homeowner is assessed an amount based on the maintenance that must be done. The replacement reserves for _ this development would include the monument, the retaining walls, the conservation wetland buffer signs, and other maintenance items. Every year a CPA audits the replacement reserves. When the HOA is turned over to a board they can decide to continue with the current management company that is handling the replacement reserves, hire a different management company, or manage the reserves themselves. Councilmember Tamble stated according to the traffic study the increased traffic flow on Keithson will not be as great as it would appear with an additional 10 cars during the peak times and 80 cars spread throughout the day. This is what would be considered the worst-case scenario and the traffic will probably not be this great. City Planner Beekman clarified the worst-case scenario of 75 cars on Colleen and Arden View Road was if there is no connection to Keithson Drive. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-2uiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Verv_ Low Density Residential Based on the Findin s of Fact and the April 25 2011 Report to the Ci Council. The motion carried unanimous) 5-0 . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 20 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat(continued) - Attorney Filla stated the Council would need to decide if they prefer the dual cul-de-sac option or the through street for Keithson Drive. The proposed motion for approval of the preliminary plat assumes a through street for Keithson Drive. Councilmember Werner stated he would be in favor of the dual cul-de-sac. This is a compromise between the residents and the developer that creates a win-win for them. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to Approve Planning Case 11-006 for a Preliminary Plat at 4500 Snelling Avenue North to Subdivide the Parcel into 39 Lots, Based on the Findines of Fact and Submitted Plans as Amended by the Conditions of Approval in the April 25 2011,Report to the City Council. - Councilmember Holden stated proper due diligence has not been performed on the dual cul-de- sac option and she did not feel the Council could vote for this option not knowing the full impacts. Once the preliminary plat is approved, the City will not be able to make additional - recommendations because the next step would be to approve the final plat, which will be based on the recommendations given by the Planning Commission and City Staff. MOTION: Councilmember Werner moved and Councilmember Tamble seconded a motion to Amend the Preliminary Plat to Add the Dual Cul-De-Sac as Proposed by Pulte Group and Not Make Keithson Drive a Throullh Street. Mayor Grant clarified if this amendment were passed, the adjustment would need to be made to all the recommendations and documents. Councilmember Werner stated the residents are really against a through-street on Keithson Drive. He stated he understood the concerns presented by Staff but he felt the priority should be given to the residents of the established neighborhood. The developer is not losing any lots with the dual cul-de-sac versus the through street option. Councilmember Holden stated Keithson Drive residents are fighting for the neighborhood but as a community leader she needs to look at the City as a whole. Not all of the neighborhoods being affected by this decision are being represented and most of the residents on Keithson Drive knew this road would be developed into a through street at some time. The traffic on County Road 96 will only increase with time and the dual cul-de-sac option does not give the residents an alternative to getting out of their neighborhood. She stated she .may not want to support the through street option but she cannot leave those residents on Keithson Drive with only one entrance point to their neighborhood. Mayor Grant stated the residents on Keithson Drive want to keep their neighborhood but the only other opening is County Road 96. From a City perspective Keithson Drive was intended to be a through street and for emergency vehicles this should be a through street. The Council needs ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 21 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat(continued) - to do what is right for the City and also protect the residents of Keithson Drive for the future. A through-street may not be a popular decision but it is the right decision. Councilmember Holmes stated she has always been in favor of the through-street and the Council should listen to the recommendations of Staff. The amendment to change Keithson Drive to the dual cul-de-sac option was called to a vote. The motion failed (2-3; Mayor Grant, Councilmembers Holmes and Holden) MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a - motion to Add Recommendation 20: Pulte Group will provide at least 5 different home designs for the development. The motion carried unanimously Councilmember Holmes stated Pulte was requesting guidance on buffer protection. She asked if this had been addressed. City Planner Beckman stated this had been discussed with Pulte and there will be extended easements and monument signs will be placed to define the wetland areas. These are part of the recommendations for approval. Councilmember Holmes asked if the Council wanted to do something with Lot 10. Councilmember Holden stated there is really nothing the Council can do about this section of land. Mayor Grant stated this section of land is acceptable. Councilmember Holmes asked if the City could be guaranteed there will be no drainage problems created by the developer. City Attorney Filla stated the City needs to rely on the engineers and the construction for the property and that it is done to the approved plans. The City and Pulte have hired experts to determine the proper grading for this project. Public Works Director Maurer stated the City is relying on the Rice Creek Watershed's hydrologist's determination that the proposed grading plans properly address the drainage for this project. The City will also have inspectors on the site to ensure the property is constructed to the specifications in the submitted plans. The motion to approve the preliminary plat was called to a vote. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 22 8.C. Planning Case 11-006 — Fox Ridge Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat(continued) - The motion carried 3-2• Councilmembers Werner and Tamble . D. 2006 Pavement Management Program (PMP)Mediation Update City Attorney Filla stated on March 2, 2011, mediation for the 2006 PMP took place. Staff was given the authority to settle the dispute for up to $25,000. The results were $25,000 that Staff estimates it would cost to repair the damages. The fifteen worst driveways will be replaced and the three spots will be repaired. He stated that a closed work session was requested following this meeting to discuss the 2010 PMP mediation, but this would not be necessary at this time. He stated he only needed to inform the Council that the mediation session is scheduled for Friday, April 30, at 1:30 p.m. in the City offices. There are five people who have appealed and he understands that there is no flexibility in the principle assessment, but if it could be worked out the payments could be spread out over a longer period of time. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Werner stated he had talked with a Mayor in the south Metro area and in this community they have signs posted at the end of all roads that are not cul-de-sacs so that residents are aware the road will become a through street in the future. Councilmember Holden stated Public Works Director Maurer had brought this up to the City Council a month ago for consideration. Councilmember Holden asked if the City will be doing significant landscaping on all the ponds that need to be dredged or if this particular project was an exception. Public Works Director Maurer stated the significant landscaping for the Indian Oaks Pond is not a pattern for all the ponds. The City would need to do some restoration on any pond that is dredged in order to repair any damage that is done during the dredging process but not to this same extent. Councilmember Holmes stated it would be helpful if out of office messages on e-mail and voice mail were done for those employees that are out of the office. Mayor Grant stated there is a pet crematorium proposed in New Brighton and there are three Arden Hills residential properties within the required 350-feet for notification for this project. There are significantly more homes that are just beyond this requirement. He suggested the City review its policy regarding the distance for notification and consider increasing this to 500-feet. He requested this discussion be added to a future work session. Mayor Grant stated he had received a letter from a resident requesting paving for his neighborhood. He requested Staff to follow up with this letter. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 23 9. Council Comments and Requests (continued) City Administrator Klaers distributed copies of 2 newspaper articles from 1999 relating to Round Lake. Mayor Grant clarified Councilmembers need to submit information for distribution to the Council to the City Administrator and not to individual Councilmembers. The City Administrator will ensure the documents are properly distributed. City Administrator Klaers stated Councilmember Holmes would be unable to attend the May 2 goal-setting meeting or the May 23 rescheduled regular Council meeting. He stated the Council could reconsider these meeting dates but a decision would need to be reached so the schedule could be properly posted. City Administrator Klaers stated the Ramsey County League of Governments meeting is on Thursday, April 28. He stated he has also contacted Mike Fix regarding the Round Lake issue. Mr. Fix is available to meet with the City on May 9 before the regular City Council meeting or May 16 for a work session. Councilmember Tamble stated he would prefer May 16 at a work session. Councilmember Holden stated she would prefer May 16 at a work session. Councilmember Holmes stated the budget and levy discussion would be on the May 16 work session agenda so she would prefer May 9. It was the consensus of the Council to have the discussion with U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and U.S. Army concerning Round Lake on May 16. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Tamble moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried unanimous) 5-0 . Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 11:05 p.m. f vlhl h=J Lj Patrick Klaers David Grant City Administrator Mayor