HomeMy WebLinkAbout2C, Fiscally Constrained Street CIP -AVEEN,HILL,
Request for Council Action 2C
Prepared By: Terry Maurer,Public Works
� Work Session Date: October 15, 2012.
Director
Fiscally Constrained Street CIP
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Discussion Topic:
City Council discussion and direction to staff regarding how to revise the CIP.
Supporting Documents:
1. Memorandum dated October 15,2012, from Terry Maurer,Public Works Director.
2. Spreadsheets.
lt
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 15, 2012
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Patrick Klaers, City Administrator
FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director -04�
SUBJECT: Fiscally Constrained Street CIP
Background
Earlier this summer the City Council asked staff to present a fiscally constrained street
CIP at an average spending level of$1,000,000 per year. It is staffs understanding that
this amount was to include all expenditures for street projects whether funding was from
the PIR fund, MSA funding or one of the enterprise funds and without regard to whether
a portion of the funding was recovered through assessments. Also, this revised street CIP
was to include all projects whether on local streets or on County/State highways.
Based on these parameters, staff has identified the following list of projects for the
foreseeable future. Included in this list is an estimated total City expenditure for the
project and estimated funding sources.
1. 2013 PMP Improvement
The feasibility study has been ordered for this project which includes all streets in the
Glenhill Road/Edgewater Avenue neighborhood south of Lake Johanna. The total
project cost will vary depending on whether or not the streets are reconstructed with
concrete curb and gutter, but currently the CIP estimates the total project cost at
$1,534,000. This amount is divided between the following funds: PIR $869,000,
sanitary sewer utility fund $55,000, water utility fund $260,000, surface water
management utility fund $350,000.
2. US 10/Hwy 96 Grade Separation Project
The City will have cost in this project for items based on the Ramsey County cost
participation policy. A more accurate estimate of City cost will be available as
City Council Meeting
PAAdmin\Council\Agendas&Packet Inform ation\2012\10-15-12 Wk Sess\Packet\10-15-12CIP Memo.doc
Page 1 of 3
soon as Mn/DOT is completing plan preparation. Currently it is listed in the CIP at
$490,000. Much of this amount will be MSA eligible and the remainder will likely
come from the enterprise funds.
3. County Road E (B-2 Zone) Improvements
The City is currently having an Implementation Plan prepared by a consultant for this
project. That plan is nearing completion. This project is currently in the CIP at
$2,612,000. This amount is shown in the CIP as coming from primarily the PIR fund
with smaller amounts coming from the enterprise fund. Much of the items that are
anticipated to be funded from the PIR fund would likely also be MSA fund eligible.
4. County Road E Bridge Over TH 51
This is a Mn/DOT bridge replacement project programmed for 2015. The City's CIP
has $150,000 itemed in it for this project anticipating we may have to contribute to
get pedestrian facilities on both sides of the bridge. This money is shown coming
from the PIR fund but would also be MSA fund eligible.
5. Lexington Avenue Improvement (I-694 to Co Rd F)
The County is starting to prepare for this project in 2014 as a follow-up to the
Mn/DOT I-694 project. It is unclear at this point what the City's contribution to this
project will be based on the County cost participation policy. This project is currently
in the CIP at $100,000 from the MSA fund.
6. Round Lake Road Improvement
Round Lake Road is able to have excess increment spent on its reconstruction and
currently appears near the end of the five-year CIP. The CIP estimate for the project
is $1,190,000. A more current estimate has been prepared looking at the opportunity
to eliminate Lift Station #11 by extending gravity sanitary sewer with the project.
Also, a more detailed look at storm drainage requirements was completed. The new
total project estimate is $1,740,000. Funding sources could include excess increment,
MSA funding and/or enterprise funds.
7. Glenview Neighborhood PMP
The Glenview neighborhood is in the CIP (currently listed as 2015 PMP). The
estimated total project cost is $3,600,000. That cost is proposed to be funded from
several sources: PIR $2,450,000, sanitary sewer utility fund $50,000, water utility
fund $600,000, surface water management utility fund $500,000.
8. Indian Oaks/Floral Drive Area PMP
This area is in the current CIP as the 2017 PMP. The estimated total cost is
$1,753,000. The funding sources are listed as: PIR $1,337,000, sanitary sewer utility
fund $55,000, water utility fund $26,000, surface water management utility fund
$335,000.
City Council Meeting
P:\Admin\Council\Agendas&Packet Information\2012\10-15-12 Wk Sess\Packet\10-15-12CIP Memo.doc
Page 2 of 3
9. Old Snelling Avenue Street and Bridge Project
A Scoping Document, preliminary survey work, soil borings and bridge final plans
have all been prepared for the project (bridge final plans are still being worked on by
the consultant). This project is in the CIP at an estimated total project cost of
$1,416,000. The planned funding sources are primarily MSA funds with some minor
amounts from the enterprise fund. It is also anticipated that half of the bridge
construction cost will be funded from State Bridge Bonds that have yet to be applied
for.
10. Additional PMP Areas
Other areas of the City that will need a PMP project some time in the future include:
Thom Drive area, Grant and Noble Road area, Beckman Avenue/Sandeen Road,
Jerrold/Edgewater and Glenpaul area. None of these areas have had any estimated
project cost or funding sources prepared for them.
Based on this list of upcoming street projects, attached are two spreadsheets. The first
shows the ten payments listed above and their estimated funding sources. The second
spreadsheet shows what an average $1,000,000 per year fiscally constrained CIP might
look like. Of course the order of the projects could always be rearranged.
Questions staff would pose for the Council to consider are:
1. Should the County Road E (B-2) project be downsized and/or moved to a
different year?
2. Should MSA funding and/or excess tax increment be above and beyond the
$1,000,000 per year.
3. Are the projects programmed in the proper order.
Council Action Requested
City Council discussion and direction to staff regarding how to revise the CIP.
City Council Meeting
P:\Admin\CounciAAgendas&Packet Information\2012\10-15-12 Wk Sess\Packet\10-15-12CIP Memo.doc
Page 3 of 3