Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-8-13-PC1245 W Highway 96 Clayton Larson -- Andy Holewa Sam Scott Roberta Thompson www.cityofardenhills.org Vacant Janet Stodola (Alternate) Dave McClung Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well- infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.A.April 3, 2013, Draft Planning Commission Minutes Documents:APRIL 3, 2013, DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES.PDF PLANNING CASES 3.A. E Street Flats Sign Standard Adjustment; Stuart Companies Matthew Bachler, Community Development Intern Documents:MEMO.PDF,ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF 3.B. TCAAP Sign Standard Adjustment; Ramsey County Matthew Bachler, Community Development Intern Documents:MEMO.PDF,ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS 4.A.2 District Design Standards Discussion Matthew Bachler, Community Development Intern Documents:ATTACHMENT A.PDF, MEMO.PDF COMMENTS AND REPORTS 5.A.Report From The City Council Documents:MEMO.PDF 5.B.TCAAP Update Documents:MEMO.PDF A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2013 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Clayton Larson called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Clayton Larson, Commissioners Angela Hames, Andrew Holewa, Roberta Thompson, and Clayton Zimmerman Absent: Commissioners Samuel Scott and Janet Stodola (Alternate) Also present were: City Planner Meagan Beekman, Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler, Councilmember Dave McClung, and Recording Secretary Debbie Wolfe. Councilmember Dave McClung administered the Oath of Office for re-appointed Commissioners Andy Holewa and Clayton Zimmerman. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – APRIL 3, 2013 Chair Larson stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 6, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes Commissioner Thompson moved, seconded by Commissioner Holewa, to approve the March 6, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). PLANNING CASES A.Planning Case 13-003 – Lexington Station Master and Final PUD: Roberts Management Company. City Planner Meagan Beekman reviewed Robert’s Development Company has submitted an application for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) at the southwest corner of ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 2 Red Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. The application is not yet completed, however, staff and the applicant are seeking feedback from the Planning Commission on the submitted plans. City Planner Meagan Beekman continued the concept review process is an opportunity for the City Council and Planning Commission to provide comments, questions, concerns, and suggestions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and applicant. No formal action is being requested this evening. The Master and Final PUD application will be subject to the full review process, including a public hearing with Planning Commission and City Council review. It is anticipated that the formal review by the Planning Commission will take place at the May 8, 2013 meeting. A revised plan submitted by the Applicant is currently being reviewed by staff and will not be part of this evening’s discussion. City Planner Meagan Beekman reviewed the background stating Roberts Development Company owns the industrial/warehouse building at 3771 Lexington Avenue that has been converted to retail, as well as the property at 1130 Red Fox Road. They are currently under contract for the Blue Fox property, which consists of two parcels. The applicant is proposing a multi-phased redevelopment at the southwest corner of Red Fox Road and Lexington Avenue that would include all four parcels. Phase I would involve the demolition of the Blue Fox Restaurant and the construction of an approximately 15,000 square foot retail building for up to nine tenants. Three of the retail bays would be for larger retail or restaurant users. The site plan includes a drive-up window that wraps around the eastern side of the property and outdoor seating areas. The applicant would be seeking flexibility from the Zoning Code to allow the building to be placed closer to the Lexington Avenue right of way. The building would be oriented to the west towards what would eventually become a larger retail center in Phases II and III. City Planner Meagan Beekman reviewed the applicant is also proposing to remove all three driveways associated with the Blue Fox property; however, they would like to add an additional curb cut entrance on the property at 3771 Lexington Avenue, across from Target’s southern drive access. The applicant would like to see a stop light installed at this new intersection. The County is reviewing this request and is considering doing a traffic study of the Lexington Avenue corridor from County Road E to 694 in order to evaluate a stoplight proposal, as well as address other traffic concerns related to this corridor. This application for a redevelopment does require a traffic study, which will be completed in conjunction with the County’s work. Phase II of the Master PUD development would include reconfiguring of the existing building at 1130 Red Fox Road to reorient it towards the east and the new retail building, as well as the construction of additional parking. The building is currently used as office and light manufacturing. The applicant intends to repurpose the building into larger retail users. Phase III would involve the demolition of the existing building at 3771 Lexington Avenue. Three new buildings would be constructed, two of which would be two stories with retail on the main floor and office above. The third building would be a single story and all retail. City Planner Meagan Beekman indicated on a drawing the Master Site Plan. Discussion City Planner Meagan Beekman the Master Plan for the four parcels creates what could be a dynamic and visually attractive retail center in Arden Hills. The retail uses would complement the area and are a good fit with the adjacent land uses. The redevelopment also improves internal traffic circulation throughout the sites and eliminates driveways onto Lexington Avenue and Red Fox Road that are nearest to the intersection. The creation of a new intersection on the ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 3 south side of the site also creates an alternative route for people exiting the development to avoid the Red Fox/Lexington stop light. Staff feels that additional traffic analysis is necessary, and would encourage Ramsey County to take a broader look at the corridor to determine if a second stop light that serves Target and this redevelopment is warranted. A second stop light would have the added benefit to existing employees and customers of businesses in the Red Fox/Grey Fox industrial area as an additional alternative for turning left onto Lexington Avenue. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated as a standalone development Phase I, and the orientation of the building away from Lexington Avenue, seems counter-intuitive; however, as a Master PUD that includes the two parcels to the east and south the project as a whole creates better internal traffic circulation for the area and works well. The applicant would be requesting flexibility from the Zoning Code to construct the building 20 feet from the Lexington Avenue right of way, when the Code requires a 50 foot setback. Staff is generally supportive of this flexibility because moving the building towards Lexington allows driveways that are close to the Red Fox/Lexington intersection to be closed and pushes traffic circulation away from the intersection, improving access. In addition, the Ramsey County right of way in front of this property is unusually wide. There are 60 feet between the property line and the road in front of the Blue Fox property, whereas there are only 15 feet between the road and the property line on the other side of the street. The width of the right of way on the Arden Hills side of the street pushes buildings back farther from t he road than is required on the Shoreview side of the street. This inconsistency makes it difficult for retail businesses, which rely heavily on visibility from the road for their success, and becomes a detent to redevelopment. The large expanse of grass is not as visually interesting as a more dynamic landscaped area that includes a multitude of plantings. Staff has concerns about wrapping the drive-up window aisle around the Lexington Avenue side of the building, and would prefer a less prominent location; however, the grade drops approximately three feet from Lexington Avenue, and the inclusion of the retaining wall may sufficiently screen the drive-up window from Lexington Avenue. Staff would like to see additional landscaping to screen what would be the rear of the building, and architectural elements that create visual interest from Lexington Avenue. Furthermore, Staff has requested a more pronounced internal sidewalk system and more linkages to an external sidewalk system. City Planner Meagan Beekman continued the front elevation, which would face west, appears to comply with the City’s design standards for the B-2 and B-3 Zoning Districts. The rear, or Lexington Avenue, side of the building would have minimal transparent glass; however, Staff recommends that the end caps of the building and the center bay offer enhanced architectural elements, including transparent glass to add height and interest to the building. Staff would also recommend expanding the outdoor seating areas, enhancing the outdoor experience with additional landscaping, particularly on the Lexington Avenue side of the building; and including a more prominent visual focal point at the Red Fox/Lexington Avenue intersection. The County does not allow commercial signage to be located in their rights of ways; however, they have indicated that landscaping would be permitted. She noted there is a three foot grade change. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 4 City Planner Meagan Beekman stated no formal action is necessary the applicant and staff are seeking feedback from the Planning Commission on the submitted plans. Chair Larson asked if the traffic study will be completed by the May Planning Commission Meeting. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated it most likely would not be completed and the findings will come later. Chair Larson added the closing of the three access points would be an advantage. Commissioner Thompson asked if the access point would align with the Target intersection. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the County would not allow it if it did not align with the Target intersection. Commissioner Holewa asked if the spacing of the stop lights was a concern. He stated he would like the two lights coordinated together. Mr. Nick Roberts, owner of Roberts Development Company, stated they just closed on the Blue Fox property last Monday. They are looking forward to getting the project done. Chair Larson stated the drive-up and queue along Lexington is somewhat awkward. Something more than the retaining wall needs to be added. He suggested the back doors be painted to blend in with the brick. Chair Larson suggested landscaping between the areas between the towers in the right-of-way. He is concerned about the back doors of the tenant spaces. Mr. Roberts stated the drive-thru has been moved to the North side of the building. The queuing will follow the same track and some patio seating will be lost. Mr. Roberts stated his vision is to make it a high end retail center. He has brought some samples for Commission review. He wants the area to have a timeless feel. The plan is to paint the doors and landscaping will be done with irrigation. Mr. Roberts stated the back of the building should be as appealing as the front. Commissioner Zimmerman stated he concurred with Chair Larson. He stated he assumes there will be signage to direct traffic. Mr. Roberts stated the signs will be closer to the road. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if Blue Fox is just going away and Mr. Roberts stated that is the plan. On the 3771 building the plan is to do the project in phases as it evolves. Phase II is the 1120 building. Commissioner Thompson asked for an overview of Mr. Robert’s vision for the development. Mr. Robert’s stated in Phase I he would foresee two restaurants, a coffee shop, some mixed retail, possibly a high-end wine store. Phase II may include a fitness center and Phase III may include some offices, family sit-down dining, underground parking, dentist office, insurance agent, etc. Commissioner Thompson asked if people would be walking from one area to the other and whether the landscaping would include pavement for walkers and bicycles. Mr. Roberts stated there is a pedestrian plan for Phase I with a crosswalk connecting the parking lots. Commissioner Thompson stated she has seen different color pavement indicating a crosswalk area and that might be something for the developer to consider. Commissioner Holewa stated he was concerned about the view from Lexington Avenue. He stated some of the businesses may not require a lot of signage. Commissioner Hames asked if the drive-thru would be a late night drive-thru and Mr. Roberts stated it would be a coffee shop with early morning business. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 5 City Planner Meagan Beekman stated an internal pedestrian plan has been requested from the Developer. Mr. Roberts stated there is not a sidewalk planned at this point along Red Fox Road but this may be addressed at a later date. Commissioner Zimmerman stated he does not want to forget about bicycle access. Chair Larson asked about the exterior colors. Mr. Christian Henry, the project Architect, provided a color copy of the drawing showing exterior colors. He stated the towers would have metal roof. Commissioner Hames asked if they have other developments in the area. Mr. Roberts stated this is really his first retail project. Commissioner Hames asked if this retail space is modeled after any other projects. Mr. Roberts stated they did look at other retail spaces and took some common themes into this project. Mr. Roberts stated a few years ago he remodeled the 1120 building. Commissioner Hames stated when she first saw this plan she thought of a development in New Brighton. Chair Larson stated he has some problems with the dumpster location. Mr. Roberts stated those have been relocated in the revised plan. Chair Larson referred to the Village development in Blaine. He stated roll-up doors are on the areas where the trash is kept. Chair Larson stated they are part of the façade. Commissioner Hames asked where they were related to and Mr. Henry indicated the new location on the drawing. Chair Larson stated the tenants will need to come out the front doors with their trash. He feels this may be unattractive to customers. Commissioner Holewa suggested bike racks be at a central location rather than each retail site having a bike rack. He also suggested some railroad themed items be used on t he site. Mr. Henry stated the patio area would have bench seating and plantings and there would be room for bike racks. Commissioner Hames stated this is a very exciting plan and will be a nice addition to Arden Hills. Commissioner Thompson asked what the timeline is for the County to look at the intersection. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the intention is the timing for the County should not impede Phase I. The County will do a corridor traffic study identifying the access points and improving movement. The County would like to have some assistance from Shoreview and Arden Hills to help with the study. Commissioner Thompson asked if any work had been done where the new Trader Joe’s is going in. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the County has not done any work but the City of Shoreview has. Shoreview has identified a number of improvements to the Lexington/Red Fox Road intersection and they do plan to go ahead with those improvements. B.Planning Case 13-004 – Zoning Code Amendment; Parks and Open Space Zoning District Discussion ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 6 Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler reviewed the Planning Commission is requested to review the draft Parks and Open Space (P/OS) Ordinance and Park Preserve (PP) Ordinance and provide further direction. They will also review the Diversion and Disposal of Recreation Areas Ordinance and recommend amendments, if necessary. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated the City completed its Parks, Trails, and Open Space (PTOS) Plan in 2002. The PTOS Plan addresses demographic and recreational trends that affect the City’s park, trail, and recreation needs. Several recommendations entail renovating existing park space, as well as improving the accessibility of these resources. The Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee and City staff have since made significant progress in implementing the goals listed in the PTOS Plan. In September 2009, the City Council adopted the Arden Hills 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The plan outlines the community’s vision and goals, which are intended to guide the City’s programs, priorities, and decision-making processes. Several policies and goals contained in the plan address the protection of open space and outdoor recreational amenities: Chapter 6 – Land Use Evaluate and amend the land use regulations to achieve the highest possible development standards, enhance the natural environment, protect public health, support a vital mix of land uses, and promote flexible approaches to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Provide a balanced mix of residential, park, open space, and commercial land uses. Chapter 9 – Parks and Recreation Develop, maintain, and encourage the use of a system of neighborhood parks and pathways that are safe and engaging. Chapter 10 – Protected Resources Develop or enhance regulations to protect the City’s natural resources, including trees, lakes, wetlands, and other unique or significant natural resources. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler showed the 2030 Future Land Use Map indicating Park and Open Space and Park Preserve Lands. The Park Preserve area is entirely located on the Training Site. He showed the Current Zoning Code and noted there is not a distinct district set aside for parks or open space areas within zoning regulations. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated the Comprehensive Plan identifies a total of 576 acres of park and open space land, and categorizes P/OS as an existing and future land use designation. Park Preserve (PP) is an additional existing and future land use designation applied to open space areas in the City. Currently there is not a district set aside for parks or open space areas within zoning code regulations. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler reviewed the drafts for the proposed Park and Open Space Ordinance and Park Preserve Ordinance currently include three primary sections: 1. A description of the intent of the ordinance 2. A subdivision outlining permitted uses, and 3. A subdivision listing special regulations. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 7 Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler suggested additional points of discussion: Do the current draft adequately address privately-owned park and open space land uses; Should the ordinance language on permitted uses be prescriptive or general Is an additional section needed for acceptable conditional uses and an approval process for such uses; Given that much of the City’s open space and recreational land contains sensitive natural areas, are more stringent development and design standards needed to regulate any development that might occur on these lands Other special regulations that might be appropriate. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated also under discussion at the November 9, 2011 meeting was whether to include a provision in the Parks and Open Space Ordinance that would require the City to replace any converted or transferred park space with an equivalent amount of park land within city limits. Upon further research, Staff found that such an ordinance already exists in the Arden Hills City Code (Section 720.09 – Diversion and Disposal of Recreation Areas). A copy is attached for Commission review. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler requested the Planning Commission review the draft Parks and Open Space (P/OS) Ordinance and Park Preserve (PP) Ordinance and provide further direction. Review Diversion and Disposal of Recreation Areas Ordinance and recommend amendments, if necessary. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler suggested separate zoning districts should be created for the Park and Open Space and Park Preserve land uses. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler provided drafts of Special Requirements for the Parks and Open Space (P/OS) District and Special Requirements for the Park Preserve (PP) District. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler provided discussion questions: 1. Do the current drafts adequately address privately-owned park and open space land uses? 2. Should the ordinance language on permitted uses be prescriptive or more general? 3. Is an additional section needed for acceptable conditional uses and an approval process for such uses? 4. Given that much of the City’s open space and recreational land contains sensitive natural areas, are more stringent development and design standards needed to regulate any development that might occur? Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler reviewed Chapter 7 Recreation Areas, 720.09 Diversion and Disposal of Recreation Areas. Key provisions: 1. Park and Recreation Committee review and recommendation ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 8 2. Public hearing held by City Council 3. City Council approval 4. Commitment of resources to acquire substitute recreational areas. Staff does not see a need to amend the City’s existing ordinance. Chair Larson asked how much privately owned park space is there and City Planner Meagan Beekman stated she is not aware of any. Commissioner Hames stated she believes according to the map there are many privately owned park areas. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the first thing needed is to create the districts after which the rezoning could be done. The property owners would be notified of the new zoning districts. Commissioner Hames asked if a separate designation would be needed for private park land. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated that would not be necessary. The park plan would not be amended. Only the zoning designation would be changed. Commissioner Holewa asked if rezoning of private park land would remove it from the tax rolls and City Planner Meagan Beekman stated it would still be taxed but at a lower rate. Pulte will be building a park within the development. Commissioner Hames asked if the designations would be recognized by Ramsey County. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated there are many cities’ that have different zoning for parks and open space. Chair Larson asked if each parcel would need a PID number and City Planner Meagan Beekman stated it would. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated even unplatted properties have PID numbers. She noted one parcel can have multiple zoning designations. Commissioner Zimmerman stated developments have generated fees for park dedication rather than land. In looking at TCAAP there may be a large amount of land for park dedication. He asked if we are coordinated well enough with this ordinance that we could realize the park space that is planned. City Planner Meagan stated there is a system in place regarding park dedication. For TCAAP there is one owner – the County. A cohesive master plan will be needed that will identify the open space and park land. The zoning code has a lot of detail regarding the park land and open space requirements. Commissioner Zimmerman asked who the gate-keeper will be to ensure this happens. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the City will develop the Master Plan. The joint development authority will be the gate-keeper based on documents created by the City of Arden Hills. Commissioner Hames stated the discussion is getting off topic. She stated she approves of the two designations and the drafts provided by staff. Commissioner Holewa thanked Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler and City Planner Meagan Beekman for their work on this. Commissioner Holewa suggested rewording of 1320.13 Subd 2. A. striking “practical” and inserting “considering the public needs and the cost of maintenance.” Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated the City cannot dictate on Federal owned property. He referred to 1320.14 Subd 1 #E & F. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 9 Commissioner Hames stated Commissioner Holewa had asked about buildings on parkland that are used to maintain the parkland. Commissioner Holewa stated if a building is constructed in a park that was not used for the park, it would have to be mitigated by the City Council. Chair Larson stated the drafts seem sufficiently flexible. Chair Larson asked if tools are in place for eliminating encroachment. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated the City of Roseville has a Park and Recreation District with detailed design standards. He stated there is a provision that talks about requiring any building that goes into a park, have a setback. Chair Larson stated he is more concerned about properties adjoining open space. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the tools are in place to manage that. Commissioner Thompson referred to Attachment F and Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated that is from Brooklyn Park. Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated all questions were addressed by commissioners. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None COMMENTS AND REPORTS A.Report from the City Council Councilmember McClung reviewed at the March 11, 2013, City Council Meeting, Matthew Bachler was appointed to the position of Community Development Intern. Matthew comes to the City with a Master’s of City Planning from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. He also worked for a year, during his Master’s program, as an intern for the City of Philadelphia. He recently moved to Minneapolis. Matthew will make an excellent addition to the Community Development Department as we proceed with the AUAR and Master Planning of the TCAAP property. It is anticipated that Matthew will assist Community Development Staff with zoning code amendment, economic development activities, and day to day planning tasks. March 18, 2013, City Council Work Session The City Council held a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss the 2013 Work Plan, and other planning related items. March 25, 2013, City Council Regular Meeting The City Council unanimously approved Planning Case 13-001 for a variance request at 1455 Skiles Lane. This item was previously approved by the Planning Commission at their March 6, 2013, regular meeting. Councilmember McClung attended the Open House for the Highway 96 project. Some work has begun along 96. It is anticipated in early May 2013 Highway 96 will close (East – West). Continued access will remain for Big Ten and Shearer Brothers. An agenda item has been added to each Council Meeting for updates on the 694 Project including Highways 10 and 96. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – APRIL 3, 2013 10 B.Commission and Staff Comments Commissioner Holewa asked if an agenda item could be added to each Planning Commission Meeting providing a TCAAP update. City Planner Meagan Beekman announced some upcoming events: May 18, 2013 Community Clean-Up Day at Public Works Facility. May 7, 2013 TCAAP Open House, at Public Works Facility. Councilmember McClung stated the County has received Congressional approval for the transfer of the TCAAP land. Commissioner Zimmerman asked about the GTS Workshops. ADJOURN Commissioner Hames moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson, to adjourn the April 3, 2013, Planning Commission Meeting at 8:15 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). MEMORANDUM 3.A DATE: May 8, 2013 PC Agenda Item TO: Planning Commission FROM: Matthew Bachler, Community Development Intern SUBJECT:Planning Case #13-005No public hearing required – Applicant: Stuart Co Property Location: 1195 County Road E Request: Site Plan Review – Sign Standard Adjustment Requested Action The applicant has requested a site plan review for a sign standard adjustment that would allow for a deviation from the Sign Code for the permit length and sign area of temporary wall signage at 1195 County Road E. Background 1.Overview of Request: The property at 1195 County Road E is owned by TAT properties, represented in this case by Stuart Co. The property is located in the B-2 General Business District on the north side of County Road E directly west of Lexington Avenue. The applicant is proposing to install two vinyl banners each measuring 216 square feet on the exterior walls of the property. On December 21, 2012, the City Council approved a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to remodel the existing structure at 1195 County Road E and construct 74 residential unit apartments on the site in Planning Case 12-019. The applicants have concerns about visibility of their advertising signs. The proposed reuse converts the building from a former hotel into residential apartment units, which is a substantial change in land use and may not be known by the average person driving by the building. Further, given the size of the building and the large building setback from Lexington Avenue, advertising signs are not easy to see. The building is setback approximately 360 feet from Lexington Avenue and 70 feet from County Road E. The proposed signs include images and text that would better identify the new use of the property as a residential apartment building and would provide directions on how to obtain information about the project. The applicant has provided images of the two signs (Attachment A). One sign would be located on the east building wall facing Lexington Avenue and the second sign would be located on the south building wall facing County Road E. Each sign would measure 12 feet by 18 feet, an area of 216 square feet. The combined area of the two signs would be 432 square feet. A professional sign company would install the signs. Stuart Co would maintain the signs in like new condition and repair and/or replace a sign if it is torn or deteriorates during the approved timeline. Section 1250.02 of the Sign Ordinance regulates the use of temporary on-premise signs. The property fronts Lexington Avenue and therefore standards for Sign District 5 apply in this case. The Ordinance permits the property to have no more than one temporary sign not exceeding 40 square feet in area. However, because the building currently has space for lease the property is allowed one additional temporary sign not exceeding 25 square feet in area. The applicant has asked to display the banners from the date the sign permit is issued to 30 days after the residential property receives the Certificate of Occupancy. Under the Sign Ordinance, the property is allowed to display a permitted temporary sign for no more than 30 days per calendar year. A sign advertising available space for lease in a building can be displayed until seven days after the building is leased. 2.Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use Light Industrial and Office, North Commercial B-3 Service Business District Industrial, Commercial South Community Mixed Use B-2 General Business District Commercial Commercial East City of Shoreview City of Shoreview City of Shoreview West Community Mixed Use B-2 General Business District Commercial 3.Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Apt 4+ Units Zoning: B-2 General Business District Size:7.65 Acres Topography: Relatively Flat Plan Evaluation 1. Site Plan Review – Section 1260: Sign Standard Adjustment Section 1260.01 of the Sign Code permits adjustments to sign height, number, type, lighting, area, and/or location through the site plan review process if criteria number 1 or 2 is met and the required criteria number 3 is met. In this case, criteria one and three are most applicable. The criteria are as follows: 1.There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; or, 2.The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; and 3.The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. The applicant has submitted a letter responding the above criteria (Attachment A). 2. Purpose of the B-2 District According to Section 1320.04 Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the purpose of the B-2 District is as follows: 1.To be a place in which people can live, work and play. 2.To create a compact, architecturally diverse, pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly community with a distinct identity. 3.To provide a connected sidewalk system and places for people to gather and socialize. 4.To implement design standards to promote an attractive environment with lasting and sustainable value. 5.To group compatible retail and service business uses that tend to draw trade that is naturally interchangeable and promotes business prosperity. 6.To provide an adequate supply of business and professional service areas to meet the needs of residents. 7.To minimize the effects of traffic congestion, noise, odor, glare and similar safety problems. 8.To implement the Plan known as the “Guiding Plan for the B2 District,” which was adopted by the City Council on October 27, 2008. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed sign standard adjustment at 1195 County Road E meets the criteria in the Sign Code to deviate from the sign regulations and if the proposed temporary on-premise signage would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood and the community as a whole. Staff offers the following twelve findings for consideration: 1.The property is located in the B-2 Zoning District and Sign District 5. 2.The property is a conforming use in the B-2 Zoning District under the approved Planned Unit Development. 3.In Sign District 5, one temporary sign is permitted up to 40 square feet. The sign may be in place for up to 30 days per calendar year. 4.In Sign District 5, one temporary sign up to 25 square feet advertising available space in a building is permitted. The sign may be in place until seven days after the building is leased. 5.The proposed signs would be vinyl banners that would each measure 12 feet by 18 feet, or 216 square feet in size. 6.The proposed signs would be displayed from the date the sign permit is issued to 30 days after the residential property receive the Certificate of Occupancy. 7.Section 1260 of the Sign Code permits deviation from the Sign Code through the Site Plan Review process. 8.The location of the building limits the visibility of temporary signage as permitted in the Sign Code from County Road E and Lexington Avenue. 9.Sign Code regulations on the permit length of temporary signage would limit the owner’s ability to effectively advertise the availability of apartment units in the building. 10.The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the B- 2 zoning district. 11.The signs would not be visible from residential properties. 12.The sign would not have a negative impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole because they are consistent with the size and layout of the property on which they would be located. Resident Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants concerning this planning case; however, site plan reviews do not require a public hearing or public notice. Staff Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, Staff recommends approval of Planning Case 13-005 for a sign standard adjustment under the Site Plan Review process. Staff recommends the following condition be included with the approval: 1.The applicant shall remove all freestanding signs related to the apartment use located on the property upon the completed installation of the two temporary signs. 2.The two temporary wall signs shall be displayed from the date the sign permit is issued to 30 days after the property receives the Certificate of Occupancy. 3.The two temporary signs shall each measure 12 feet by 18 feet and be 216 square feet in size. 4.The applicant shall maintain the two signs in like new condition and repair and/or replace a banner if it is torn or deteriorates during the approved timeline. Options and Proposed Motion Language 1.Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 13-005 for a Site Plan Review at 1195 County Road E based on the findings of fact, the submitted plan as amended by the four conditions in the May 8, 2013, Planning Case report. 2.Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 13-005 for a Site Plan Review at 1195 County Road E based on the finds of fact, the submitted plan, and the May 8, 2013, Planning Case report. 3.Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 13-005 for a Site Plan Review at 1195 County Road E based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4.Table: Motion to table Planning Case 13-005 for Site Plan Review at 1195 County Road E:a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on April 16, 2013. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by June 15, 2013 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A)Application and supporting materials B)Air photo of the site AttachmentA streetflats rdefining student housing e A new community by 1195 County Road E Aerial 0251.04502.1Feet 502.1 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and 1:3,012 is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feetaccurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GISTHIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION MEMORANDUM 3.B DATE: May 8, 2013 PC Agenda Item TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meagan Beekman, City Planner SUBJECT:Planning Case #13-006No public hearing required – Applicant: Ramsey County Property Location: Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant site Request: Site Plan Review – Sign Standard Adjustment Requested Action The applicant has requested a site plan review for a sign standard adjustment that would allow for a deviation from the Sign Code for temporary freestanding signage on the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) site owned by Ramsey County. Background 1.Overview of Request: Ramsey County is proposing to install four temporary freestanding signs each measuring 32 square feet in total sign area on the TCAAP site owned by Ramsey County. The real estate closing for the transfer of the TCAAP site from the U.S. Army to Ramsey County was completed on April 15, 2013. Ramsey County has contracted Carl Bolander and Sons Co. to carry out demolition work and site remediation in order to prepare the site for future development. These activities are scheduled to commence in May 2013, and take approximately 30 months. The proposed sign includes graphics and text that help explain to the public the nature of the work being done on the site and how to obtain more information about the project (Attachment A). The sign area for each sign would measure 8 feet by 4 feet, an area of 32 square feet. The signs would be located in four separate locations around the site. Ramsey County has provided the City with a map showing the precise location of each sign (Attachment B): 1.Highway 96 between Highway 10 and Snelling Avenue N. 2.Gate 4 on Highway 10 3.Eastern terminus of County Road H 4.Northwestern corner of the Rice Creek Trail Corridor Section 1250.02 of the Sign Ordinance regulates the use of temporary on-premise signs. The TCAAP property falls within two separate sign districts. The portion of the property fronting Highway 96 is in Sign District 6. The remainder of the property is in Sign District 9. One of the proposed sign locations is within District 6, while the other three are within District 9. The Sign Ordinance permits one temporary freestanding sign not exceeding 22.5 square feet in area on the portion of the property fronting Highway 96. Temporary freestanding signs are not permitted on the remainder of the site. The applicant has proposed to display the signs for the duration of the demolition and remediation project on the TCAAP site. Under the Sign Ordinance, the property is allowed to display a permitted temporary sign for no more than 30 days per calendar year. 2.Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use Parks and Open Space North City of Shoreview City of Shoreview City of Shoreview South Public and Institutional B-1 Limited Business District Public and Institutional R-3 Townhouse and Low Density Multiple Dwelling Medium Density Residential; District; I-2 General Industrial EastMixed Business District Mobile Home Park, Commercial West Mixed Residential M-R Mixed Residential Vacant 3.Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Mixed Business; Park Preserve Existing Land Use: Vacant; Parks and Open Space Zoning: M-B Mixed Business; R-1 Single Family Residential Size:427 acres Topography: Rolling Plan Evaluation 1. Site Plan Review – Section 1260: Sign Standard Adjustment Section 1260.01 of the Sign Code permits adjustments to sign height, number, type, lighting, area, and/or location through the site plan review process if criteria number 1 or 2 is met and the required criteria number 3 is met. In this case, criteria 1 and 3 are most applicable. The criteria are as follows: 1.There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; or, 2.The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; and 3.The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. Site conditions on the TCAAP property justify a sign adjustment to allow the sign in Sign District 6 to be reasonably visible from the roadway adjacent to the site. This proposed sign would be located on Highway 96, which carries higher speed traffic and where there is a significant distance between vehicles and the property. Given that the signs are designed to provide the public with information about the project, an adjustment to the permitted sign area that would allow this sign to be clearly visible from Highway 96 is warranted. Additionally, an adjustment to the Sign District 9 regulations that prohibit any freestanding signs should be granted. The TCAAP property covers a total of 427 acres of land. Under the Sign Ordinance, Ramsey County would only be able to place signage about the TCAAP project at the southern end of the site on Highway 96. In order for the County to effectively inform a greater percentage of the public about the work being done on the TCAAP site, signs will need to be located at additional sites on the property. It is a benefit to the public for the County to be able to inform interested people about the activities on the TCAAP site; therefore, an adjustment to the Sign District 9 standards to allow an additional three temporary freestanding signs on the TCAAP site is warranted. The Sign Ordinance permits a property to display a temporary sign for 30 days per calendar year. However, the demolition and site remediation work on the TCAAP property is expected to take 30 months. Allowing Ramsey County to display the temporary signage until work on the site is completed would ensure that a source of information about the project was available to the general public for its duration. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed sign standard adjustment at 1195 County Road E meets the criteria in the Sign Code to deviate from the sign regulations and if the proposed temporary on-premise signage would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood and the community as a whole. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1.The property is located in the Mixed Business and Single Family Residential Zoning Districts. 2.The property is located in Sign District 6 and Sign District 9. 3.In Sign District 6, one temporary freestanding sign is permitted up to 22.5 square feet. The sign may be in place for up to 30 days per calendar year. 4.In Sign District 9, no temporary freestanding signs are permitted. 5.Ramsey County is proposing four temporary signs. 6.The proposed signs would measure 8 feet by 4 feet with a sign area of 32 square feet. 7.The proposed signs would be displayed for the duration of the demolition and remediation project on the TCAAP site. 8.Section 1260 of the Sign Code permits deviation from the Sign Code through the Site Plan Review process. 9.Site conditions limit the visibility of signs from adjacent roadways. 10.Restrictions on temporary signage in Sign District 9 would limit Ramsey County’s ability to share information about the TCAAP project with the public. 11.Sign Code regulations on the permit length of temporary signage would limit Ramsey County’s ability to share information about the TCAAP project with the public. 12.The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the Mixed Business and Single Family Residential Zoning Districts. 13.The sign would not have a negative impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole because providing information about the TCAAP project is a public benefit. Resident Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants concerning this planning case; however, site plan reviews do not require a public hearing or public notice. Staff Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, Staff recommends approval of Planning Case 13-006 for a sign standard adjustment under the Site Plan Review process. Options and Proposed Motion Language 1.Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 13-006 for a Site Plan Review at the Ramsey County TCAAP site based on the finds of fact, the submitted plan, and the May 8, 2013, Planning Case report. 2.Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 13-006 for a Site Plan Review at the Ramsey County TCAAP site based on the findings of fact, the submitted plan, and the May 8, 2013, Planning Case report, subject to the following conditions… 3.Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 13-006 for a Site Plan Review at the Ramsey County TCAAP site based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4.Table: Motion to table Planning Case 13-006 for Site Plan Review at the Ramsey County TCAAP site: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Agency Actions Since the City of Arden Hills is the applicant in this case, there is no mandated deadline for agency action. Attachments A.Site Map and Sign Locations B.Image of Sign AttachmentA RAMSEY COUNTY TCAAP REMEDIATION A Cleanup Project to Ready this Site for Development Ramsey County is cleaning up 427 acres of the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant site to residential standards to spur economic development, add to the county tax base and to promote job creation. tcaap.net City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code Subd. 8 Additional Design Standards for New Development, Redevelopment, and Modifications to Existing Sites in the B2 and B3 Districts. Unless (revised 12/17/08) preempted by the standards in this section, all other zoning provisions shall apply: A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of these additional design standards is to promote a high level of architectural, landscaping, and site design in the business districts of Arden Hills. The City seeks to create a unified, harmonious, and high-quality environment to foster a distinct, positive, and successful image for the City. The criteria by which new development, redevelopment, and site modifications in the Districts shall be judged are as follows: 1. Consistency with provisions of the comprehensive plan and other guiding plans as amended from time to time; provisions of the zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance; and all other applicable regulations. 2. Use of appropriate materials, lighting, textures, colors, and architectural and landscape forms to create a unified, high-quality design concept for each site that is compatible with adjacent and neighboring structures and functions. 3. Creation of unified site designs, each with a sense of internal order, that provide desirable environments for site users and visitors and the community as a whole and that consider all site elements. 4. Provision of safe and adequate access from public streets to sites giving ample consideration to the location and number of access points, the safety and convenience of merging and turning movements, and traffic management and mitigation. 5. Provision of on-site vehicular, bicycling, and pedestrian circulation by way of interior drives, parking areas, pathways, and walkways adequate to handle anticipated needs and to safety buffer pedestrians and cyclists from motor vehicles. Ample consideration shall be given to the width of interior drives, internal traffic movement and flow, separation of pedestrian, cycling, automobile; and delivery traffic, and the safe, convenient, and practical arrangement of parking spaces. B. Application. The standards in this Section should apply only to the building or site elements being developed or altered (i.e. a proposal for changes to a building would be required to meet only those standards that pertain to buildings while changes to a parking area would be required to meet the standards for parking areas but not for buildings). The design standards shall be applied proportionately to the degree of change proposed. Upon recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council may waive specific design standards based on the scale of the project. The City Council shall make the final determination on the compatibility and consistency with the design standards. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 1 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code C. Architectural Style and Building Character. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include, but are not limited to, building and landscaping materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, building components, height, roof-line, and setback. Monotony of design, both within projects and between projects and its surrounding, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and arrangement shall provide visual interest. Architectural style should not be restricted. D. Building Materials. Buildings shall be constructed of materials that are enduring, timeless, and well-detailed. Other new materials of equal quality to those listed may be approved by the Community Development Department. 1.At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the exterior building materials shall be of the following materials, or any combination thereof:brick,stone, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. a. Brick and tile masonry b. Native stone (or synthetic equivalent) c. Textured or patterned pre-cast concrete panels d. Hardie-Plank siding e. Transparent glass 2. The following materials may be used as trim Trimand for other accent or decorative features:may be metal, wood, or EIFS. Other high-quality materials that increase the variety and appeal of buildings may be considered as accents. Metals shall have a matte finish and neutral or earth tone colors. Metals that are used on exterior walls shall have visible corner moldings and trim. a. Matte-finished metal with visible corner moldings and trim b. Wood c. Texture pre-cast concrete masonry unit d. Gypsum reinforce fiber concrete e. Split faced block 1.f. EIFS or stucco, at least twelve (12) feet above the ground line Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 2 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code 3. The following materials are generally not acceptable: Undesirable materials shall include simulated brick or stone, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet metal, corrugated metal, concrete blocks, materials that have no pattern or relief when applied to large walls, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, and pre-cast tilt-up walls. Extensive use of mirrored or tinted glass on thefirst floor and materials that represent corporate colors or trademarks that are not in conformance with approved building materials are also undesirable. a. Simulated or painted brick b. Vinyl, aluminum, fiberglass, or asphalt siding c. Sheet metal or corrugated metal d. Unadorned or plain concrete blocks or panels e. Pre-cast tilt-up walls f. Mirrored or reflective glass g. Materials that have no pattern or relief when applied to large walls h. Materials that represent corporate colors or logos that are not in conformance with approved building materials E. Building Design. The arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall work to create a high quality development that is responsive to existing buildings, site features, and site design on adjoining sites in the district. 1. At least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line. 2. Façade treatment shall be carried around all sides. Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are reasonably visible to the general public. Plain flat walls shall not be permitted when viewable from the public right-of-way or public areas. 3. To avoid long unbroken expanses and to increase visual interest from the street, buildings of more than 40 feet in width shall be divided into smaller increments (between 20 and 40 feet) through articulation of the facades to convey the impression of individually-constructed small storefronts or, in the case of housing, housing units. This can be achieved through the combination of the following techniques: Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 3 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code a) The use of windows and doors; b) Façade modulation—stepping backward or forward or extending a portion of the façade; c) Vertical divisions into storefronts with separate display windows and entrances; d) Recesses and projections such as porches, dormers and bays that create shadows and add visual interest; e) Variation in the rooflines by using multiple roof and ridge lines perpendicular to one another, offsetting single roof lines, stepped roofs; f) Providing a lighting fixture, trellis, tree, or other landscape feature with each interval. 4. Awnings or overhangs shall be provided at entryways to provide shelter from the sun and rain. The awnings shall be opaque so as not to create a glowing effect with lights under the awnings. Awnings shall be constructed of durable, protective, and water repellant material; however, plastic or fiberglass awnings shall not be permitted. 5. Any multi-level building shall distinguish the ground floor level from the upper floors by use of any or a combination of these techniques: an intermediate cornice line, difference in building materials or details, awnings trellis or arcade, special window details, or brick corbels or quoins. A strong base and top for multi-story buildings shall be established; middle layers shall be simpler. Detail shall be an integral part of the architecture rather than a series of applied elements. 6. Franchise architecture identified with a particular chain shall be discouraged unless it is architecturally integrated into the district and conforms to these design standards. 7. Entrances shall have convenient access to the street frontage and to parking serving the use. For those properties along County Road E, access to the street frontage shall be given priority where feasible. F.Window and Door Openings. Commercial Façade Transparency. 1.Commercial Façade Transparency. Fifty percent (50%) of the first level façade that includes the primary store entrance and/or faces a public street shall be made of transparent windows and doorsthat are recessed at least one inch rather than being flush with the façade.At least twenty percent (20%) of all other facades that are reasonably visible to the public, including upper story facades, shall be Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 4 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code transparent window coverage. Simulated windows (i.e. spandrel glass) may be used on service areas only. If the building is a one story design and the first floor elevation exceeds twelve (12) feet, then only the first twelve (12) feet shall be included in calculating the façade area. If additional transparent glass is used on the remaining sides, the City may consider a proportional reduction in the transparent window and door requirement on the primary store entrance and/or public street façades 2. Residential Façade Transparency. Thirty-five percent (35%) of the first level façade that include the primary building entrance and/or faces a public street shall be transparent window and door coverage. At least twenty percent (20%) of all other facades, including upper story facades, shall be transparent window or balcony/door openings. When necessary, tinted glass may be allowed to provide privacy. At least twenty percent (20%) of the remaining sides that are reasonably visible to the public shall be window coverage, half of which may be simulated windows (i.e. spandrel glass). If additional transparent glass is used on the remaining sides, the City may consider a proportional reduction in the transparent window and door requirement on the primary store entrance and/or public street façades: 3. Configurations. The shape, size, and placement of windows and doors shall emphasize the intended organization and articulation of the façade. Windows and doors shall be recessed at least one inch rather than being flush with the building façade. 4. Materials. Acceptable materials for windows include anodized aluminum, steel, wood, and clad wood. Doors shall be made of steel, wood, or clad wood. 2.5. For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows (e.g. cooler or freezer areas, mechanical rooms, security areas, storage areas) the transparent window standards may be reduced at the discretion of the City Council. However, the architectural detailing must be provided by the use of upper level windows, which may include the partial use of simulated windows, or architectural detailing that provides arches, patterning, recesses, and shadowing that provide aesthetic interest. Architectural detailing may include such things as change in materials, change in color and other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall. G. Building Color. Colors shall be harmonious. Building colors shall consist of muted colors with low reflectance. Recommended colors include browns, grays, tans, beiges, and dark or muted green, blues, and reds. Bright or brilliant colors and sharply contrasting colors may be used for only accent purposes occupying a maximum of five percent (5%) of building façades. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 5 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code H. Fences. Fences shall blend into the landscape, be compatible with other materials used on site, and be made of a material that minimizes corrosion. Finished and treated wood, brick, stone or wrought iron is encouraged. I. Signs. 1. Business signs shall be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building and should be an integral part of the building. Signs shall be incorporated into the façades of the buildings rather than extending past the roof line and should not project more than twelve (12) inches beyond the plane of the façades. Retail business wall signs shall be located in a position above the front window that is located consistently among stores. 2. All other provisions in Chapter 12, Sign Code, shall apply. J. Site Furnishings and Seating Areas. 1. Site furnishings shall be provided based on the scale of the project. The site furnishings may be spread out on the site or clustered to provide a more formal area. Placing site furnishings near landscaped areas is encouraged. These areas may be shared by multiple tenants on a property or adjacent properties and may include tables, chairs, benches, plantings, and other outdoor amenities such as a plaza. These areas shall be maintained for year round use. Creativity is highly encouraged. These spaces shall be connected to the sidewalk system. 2. Benches and decorative plantings shall be provided near the primary entrance of all buildings on a site. 3. Restaurants shall include a functional outdoor seating area with tables, chairs, plantings, and access to the restaurant. a) No outdoor seating shall be permitted in any portion of the public sidewalks where normal pedestrian traffic flow is obstructed. b) The outdoor seating area shall not be used for exterior storage when the area is not in use. While such area is in operation, all tables and chairs shall be kept in a clean, sanitary condition. c) These areas shall be distinguished with decorative fencing and/or plantings. d) If alcoholic beverages are served, the establishment shall take reasonable steps to insure that alcoholic beverages are Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 6 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code consumed only by patrons of the establishment who are of age. All other provisions related to the license to serve alcohol shall apply. K. Screening. 1. Trash and recycling equipment, materials, and containers shall be fully enclosed and integrated into the architecture of the buildings. 2. All mechanical equipment, whether roof-mounted or ground- mounted should be integrated into the architecture of the building. It shall be completely screened from the ground-level view of adjacent properties and public streets. Wood screening shall not be permitted. 3. Truck docks and delivery areas shall face away from the public street and shall be integrated into the architecture of the building. L. Landscaping. A generous amount of plant material and landscaping shall be used on all new development and redevelopment sites. Office parking areas shall include a generous amount of perimeter and internal landscaping. Parking structures shall be visually softened with plantings. A minimum of one tree shall be placed along the right-of-way every forty (40) feet. The tree shall not interfere with the roadway and shall be on private property. M. Parking. 1. Placing parking between the street right-of-way and a building shall be discouraged. 2. No more than fifty percent (50%) of the parking on a site may be between buildings or in the side yards. 3. Sufficient parking shall be provided to accommodate the reasonable hourly peak on a given site. Shared parking is encouraged to reduce land devoted to parking. Hourly variations among different types of land use may be considered when estimated parking demands. 4. Plantings shall be used to soften and shade parking lots and parking structures. Parking and service areas shall be visually screened from street views with plantings and architectural treatments. 5. Parking lot islands shall be used to distribute large parking fields into separate “outdoor” rooms that have visual relationship to the buildings they serve. Parking lot islands shall be planted with trees or include infiltration basins and plantings. Entry drives shall be defined by trees and shrubs. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 7 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code 6. A concrete curb shall be provided around the periphery of all parking lots and access roads, except where the City Engineer determines that a curb would impede drainage. 7. Parking adjacent to streets should be screened from views with landscaping, including but not limited to trees, hedges, flowers and other bushes and/or decorative masonry walls. Berms shall be discouraged. 8. Parking structures that are visible from off the site shall display an integration of building materials building form, textures, architectural motif, and building colors with the principal building. No signs other than directional signs shall be permitted on parking ramp facades. N. Traffic Study. A traffic study shall be required for all new developments, redevelopments, and significant modifications to existing sites unless waived by the City Council. O. Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the safety and convenience of occupants and visitors. 1. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows location, type of illumination and design. A photometric analysis of site and building shall be submitted for City approval with all new construction or redevelopment projects. 2. Exterior lighting shall be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. High-pressure sodium lighting and other similar types of lighting color may be required by the City to promote a unified lighting color throughout the Districts. Other lighting colors may be considered during the City review process. 3. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. 4. Lighting under a gasoline station canopy shall not be directly visible from the street but shall be recessed into the canopy or otherwise shielded. 5. Light washing of buildings and accent lighting may be permitted through the City review process provided that it does not negatively impact residential areas or traffic safety and is complementary to the district as a whole. P. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation. Pedestrian and bicycle improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City of Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan and the local guiding plan and shall be in conformance with the following: Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 8 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code 1. Site design shall facilitate pedestrian connections and mobility within and between building, sites, and uses by providing clear visual indicators through door placement, signage, striping, raised pathways, and integrating landscaping components. Other features or materials may be considered that enhance and provide a safe pedestrian experience. 2. A sidewalk shall link the primary entrance of each building on site with the public sidewalk network. In the event a building is subdivided into multiple separated tenant spaces, a sidewalk must link the primary entrance of each separated tenant space with the public sidewalk network. 3.Bike racks shall be required near a public entrance of all buildings. 4.3.Internal sidewalk systems shall connect with adjacent planned or developed public sidewalks or trails. 5.4.The grades of all walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 6.5.Where there is new building construction or renovation where the renovation value is thirty percent (30%) or more of the pre-renovation value of the structure, a minimum six foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all rights-of-way shall be provided. The location of the sidewalk shall be prescribed by the Public Works Director. The new sidewalks shall connect to sidewalks on adjacent properties if they exist. At the discretion of the City Council, the property owner may, in lieu of constructing the sidewalk, pay the City an amount equal to the cost of constructing the sidewalk to satisfy the obligations of this section. Said payment shall be used by the City to further maintain and construct the pathway system within the City. 7.6.When there is more than one building on a site, a sidewalk must link the primary building entrances of each building to one another. Q. Bicycle Parking. 1. General Requirements. a. Bicycle parking may be provided using the following approaches: i. Bicycle Racks: Open-air devices that support bicycle frame at two locations and enable the frame and one or both wheels to be secured. The City requires that bicycle stands meet inverted “U”, ring-and-post, or comparable bicycle rack design standards. ii. Bicycle Lockers: Secured stand-alone enclosures designed to hold one bicycle per unit. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 9 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code iii. Bicycle Parking Station: Site-built structure designed for use as a secured bicycle parking facility. b. Bicycle racks or lockers must be securely anchored to the ground or building structure. c. Bicycle parking facilities shall be located on a level, concrete or pavement surface. d. Where feasible, bicycle racks shall be located in groups of two or more. 2. Location Criteria a. Bicycle parking shall be located in a safe, designated area and should be within fifty (50) feet of the primary building entrance. b. Bicycle racks shall be visible either from within the building or the public right-of-way. c. The location of such facilities shall be harmonious with the overall development plan. 3. Dimension Criteria. a. At least two (2) feet of clearance shall be provided from the centerline of each adjacent bicycle rack. b. An access aisle of at least five (5) feet shall be provided in each bicycle parking facility. c. Bicycle racks shall be at least twenty-four (24) inches from a wall to which they are parallel and thirty (30) inches from a wall which they are perpendicular. 4. Number of Required Bicycle Parking Spaces. For commercial uses, one bicycle parking space shall be provided for every twenty (20) automobile parking spaces. A minimum of two (2) parking spaces is required. 5. Reduction in the Number of Required Spaces. The number of bicycle parking spaces required may be reduced if the owner or occupant provides documentation that a lesser number of spaces will actually be needed than normally required by this Code and the City Council authorizes such lesser number after recommendation by the Planning Commission. The difference in the number of spaces provided and those required shall be shown on the approved site plans as “proof-of-bicycle parking” and shall be constructed if and when the need for such additional spaces arises. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 10 of 11 City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code Q.R. Drainage/Water Management Plan: A plan must be submitted with each project or lot development in the Districts. The plan must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District, other agencies as required, and the engineer assigned by the City. Two or more lots or projects may coordinate their plans for their mutual benefit. R.S. Environmental Conservation and Sustainability. The City encourages the use of green materials and environmentally friendly construction and site design such as the use of pervious surfaces, green rooftops, energy efficient materials, LEED standards, and other green building techniques. Section 1325 – General Regulations Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 11 of 11 MEMORANDUM 4.A DATE: May 8, 2013 PC Agenda Item TO: Planning Commission FROM: Matthew Bachler, Community Development Intern SUBJECT:B-2 District Design Standard Amendments Discussion Requested Action Review initial recommendations for amendments to the B-2 District Design Standards and provide further direction to staff. Background On October 27, 2008, the City Council adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. The plan included design guidelines for development and redevelopment in the B-2 District. These guidelines addressed fundamental site planning and design principals and proposed standards for building height and density, façade treatment, pedestrian circulation, parking, and landscaping. The City Council subsequently approved ordinance amendments on November 24, 2008, that adapted the design guidelines contained in the Guiding Plan for the Zoning Code. These guidelines are located in Section 1325.05 of the Zoning Code, Subd. 8 Additional Design Standards for New Development, Redevelopment, and Modifications to Existing Sites in the B2 and B3 Districts (Attachment A). The B-2 design standards have not been revised since their adoption in 2008. During this period, three development projects in the B-2 District have been required to meet the design standards: Planning Case 09-011: Arden Plaza Master Planned Unit Development Planning Case 11-001: McDonald’s, USA LLC Master Planned Unit Development Planning Case 12-019: 1201 County Road E Master Planned Unit Development Through the process of both reviewing these development proposals and seeing the projects built out, Staff has had the opportunity to identify components of the B-2 design standards that may require adjustments or additions. Staff is currently drafting changes to design standard provisions on bicycle parking, building materials, and commercial transparency; however, additional amendments may be necessary as Staff continues its review of the existing design standards. These revisions are needed in order to update the design standards to reflect new practices and standards, to provide developers with greater clarity on the City’s expectations in the development review process, and to ensure that future development in the B-2 District is well- designed. Discussion Bicycle Parking Section P of the B-2 District design standards addresses pedestrian and bicycle circulation improvements. Specifically, the section states that projects which are required to meet the design standards must comply with the following provision: “Bike racks shall be required near a public entrance of all buildings.” However, no additional guidance is given regarding the design, dimensions, or location of bicycle parking on the site. Further, a minimum number of bicycle parking spaces are not specified. Staff has drafted an amendment to the design standards to provide detailed specifications on bicycle parking (Attachment A). These revisions address what qualifies as bicycle parking, where bicycle parking should be located in relation to buildings and the overall site, dimension and installation requirements, and the total number of bicycle parking spaces required. Staff reviewed bicycle parking regulations used in other municipalities to inform the draft revisions. Municipalities consulted included Roseville, St. Paul, and Minneapolis. Additionally, information on dimension criteria for bicycle parking was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Transportation Bikeway Facility Design Manual. Building Materials Section D of the B-2 District design standards specifies acceptable and undesirable exterior building materials. Staff has revised this section to expand and refine the list of permitted and discouraged materials as wells as to build in more flexibility for Staff in the development review process. Staff has conducted research on high-quality building materials that are not currently on the acceptable materials list and which meet B-2 design guidelines. Many of these materials are also permitted by municipalities in the metro that have established similar design standards for their primary commercial centers or downtowns. Design guidelines for Roseville, Shoreview, Burnsville, and Hopkins were reviewed. Staff has relied on industry standards and aesthetic considerations in determining which materials are appropriate as principal building materials as opposed to trim and accent materials.The draft revision to the building materials section incorporates these new materials (Attachment A). The section on undesirable building materials has been revised to include more stringent restrictions on the use of mirrored or reflective glass in the B-2 District. Previously, the extensive use of mirrored glass on the first floor of a building was listed as undesirable. Staff believes the City should discourage the use of this material entirely in the district. Given the pace at which building material technology evolves, Staff believes a provision should be included in the section that allows the Community Development Department to approve new materials of equal quality other than those listed. An example of how this provision could be worded is included in the current draft. Commercial Façade Transparency Section F of the B-2 District design standards includes specifications on the configuration and transparency of windows and doors for commercial properties. The section does not address window transparency for multi-family residential uses, which are allowed in the B-2 District within a Planned Unit Development. Additionally, specific guidelines on the arrangement of windows on a building and the permitted materials for windows and doors are not included. Staff has revised Section F to include transparency requirements for residential facades (Attachment A). These specifications are intended to keep with the established design principals while also recognizing that commercial façade transparency requirements are not necessarily appropriate for residential buildings. Guidelines on how windows and doors should be arranged along a building wall are included in the draft revisions. These specifications are meant to ensure consistency between the overall design of the building façade and the placement of window and door openings. The list of acceptable materials for windows and doors is based on industry standards and complements the permitted building wall materials for the district. Further Points of Discussion The drafts that Staff is currently working on represent initial recommended revisions to the B-2 District design standards. Staff is hoping to start an on-going discussion with the Planning Commission about the existing design standards and areas within the standards that could be improved. Additional points of discussion might include the following: Do the draft bicycle parking space requirements accurately reflect the demand for bicycle parking facilities in Arden Hills? Are the new materials added to the acceptable building materials list enduring, timeless, and well-detailed? Are there additional types of materials that should be added to the list? Does the list of acceptable and undesirable building materials effectively address the City’s concerns regarding the quality of building materials? Are the residential façade transparency requirements appropriate? What additional sections of the B-2 District design standards need to be revised? Staff has identified the provisions on parking and franchise architecture as areas that should be studied further. Requested Action Review initial recommendations for amendments to the B-2 District Design Standards and provide further direction to staff. Attachments A. Working Draft: Section 1325.05, Subd 8. – Black-lined Version MEMORANDUM 5.A DATE: May 8, 2013 PC Agenda Item TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meagan Beekman, City Planner SUBJECT: Report from the City Council April 15, 2013, City Council Work Session The City Council directed staff to move forward with the purchase of the tax forfeited property located at 3208 Hamline Avenue N. The property was formally approved for subdivision by the Planning Commission in 2008, as the Christianson Estates Plat. The City has closed on the triangle parcel located at 3151 Lake Johanna Boulevard. The City Council directed staff to move forward with installing the City’s first gateway sign at this location and landscaping the site. Staff is working with a landscape architect to design the landscaping plan and it is anticipated that work will be completed on the site and the gateway sign installed in June. April 29, 2013, City Council Meeting The City Council unanimously approved a contract with Kimley-Horn for the AUAR, Master Planning, and Regulations and Policies for the TCAAP site in an amount not to exceed $426,004. The City Council awarded a contract to repaint the south water tower located on Red Fox Road. The Council directed staff to move forward with adding logos to the tower as part of the repainting process. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for May 8, 2013 P:\Planning\Planning Commission\CC Reports\05-08-13 - PC report - CC report.doc Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: 5.B May 8, 2013 PC Agenda Item TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meagan Beekman, City Planner SUBJECT: TCAAP Update Ramsey County closed on the purchase of TCAAP on April 15. The full Notice to Proceed has been issued to Bolander and Sons. Installation of erosion control and the pre-demolition removal of hazardous materials (i.e., fluorescent bulbs/ballasts, asbestos) has begun. Building demolition will begin in approximately two weeks. The gate at Highway Avenue/County Road H will be the main gate, and everyone entering the site will need to check in at the Bolander construction office. The area outside of the perimeter at Highway Avenue/County Road H will be signed No Parking to eliminate conflicts with construction traffic. Barriers will be placed to separate Rice Creek trail users from construction traffic. The Ramsey County sheriff will be patrolling the property. Trespassing and theft of building materials will be prosecuted. Ramsey County will hold a public informational meeting for the demolition and remediation project on Tuesday, May 7, 5:00 to 7:00 pm in the Marsden Room at the Ramsey County Public Works Facility. Postcards have been mailed to residents in Arden Hills and surrounding communities. The City has contracted with Kimley-Horn to complete the AUAR, Master Plan, and Regulations and Policies for development. This process is anticipated to take 14-18 months. 11 Page of