Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-27-14-R
APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Public inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. STAFF COMMENTS TCAAP Update Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES Draft Minutes September 8, 2014, Special City Council Work Session September 8, 2014, Regular City Council September 15, 2014, City Council Work Session September 22, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work Session September 29, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work Session 09 -08 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -08 -14 -R.PDF, 09 -15 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -22 -14 - CLOSED.PDF, 09 -29 -14 -CLOSED.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Claims And Payroll Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS Cable Franchise Extension Amendment And Cable Franchise Transfer Patrick Klaers, City Administrator Michael Bradley, NSCC Legal Counsel from Bradley Hagen and Gullilson MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF Accept Proposal From Kimley Horn For Design Services - Mounds View High School Trail Terry Maurer, Public Works Director MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF Lexington Avenue Improvement Cooperative Agreement Terry Maurer, Public Works Director MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 14 -030 - Site Plan Review - Gradient Financial Ryan Streff, City Planner CC MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDF Planning Case 14 -031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Ed Werner Regular City Council Agenda October 27, 2014 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 3.A. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 8.B. Documents: 8.C. Documents: 8.D. Documents: 8.E. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSTCAAP UpdateJill Hutmacher, Community Development DirectorMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDraft MinutesSeptember 8, 2014, Special City Council Work SessionSeptember 8, 2014, Regular City CouncilSeptember 15, 2014, City Council Work SessionSeptember 22, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work SessionSeptember 29, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work Session09-08 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -08 -14 -R.PDF, 09 -15 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -22 -14 -CLOSED.PDF, 09 -29 -14 -CLOSED.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Claims And Payroll Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS Cable Franchise Extension Amendment And Cable Franchise Transfer Patrick Klaers, City Administrator Michael Bradley, NSCC Legal Counsel from Bradley Hagen and Gullilson MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF Accept Proposal From Kimley Horn For Design Services - Mounds View High School Trail Terry Maurer, Public Works Director MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF Lexington Avenue Improvement Cooperative Agreement Terry Maurer, Public Works Director MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 14 -030 - Site Plan Review - Gradient Financial Ryan Streff, City Planner CC MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDF Planning Case 14 -031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungEd Werner Regular City Council AgendaOctober 27, 2014 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 8.B. Documents: 8.C. Documents: 8.D. Documents: 8.E. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSTCAAP UpdateJill Hutmacher, Community Development DirectorMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDraft MinutesSeptember 8, 2014, Special City Council Work SessionSeptember 8, 2014, Regular City CouncilSeptember 15, 2014, City Council Work SessionSeptember 22, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work SessionSeptember 29, 2014, Special Closed City Council Work Session09-08 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -08 -14 -R.PDF, 09 -15 -14 -WS.PDF, 09 -22 -14 -CLOSED.PDF, 09 -29 -14 -CLOSED.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Claims And PayrollSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative ServicesAshley Bertrand, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSNEW BUSINESSCable Franchise Extension Amendment And Cable Franchise TransferPatrick Klaers, City AdministratorMichael Bradley, NSCC Legal Counsel from Bradley Hagen and GullilsonMEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDFAccept Proposal From Kimley Horn For Design Services - Mounds View High School TrailTerry Maurer, Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDFLexington Avenue Improvement Cooperative AgreementTerry Maurer, Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDFPlanning Case 14 -030 - Site Plan Review - Gradient FinancialRyan Streff, City PlannerCC MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDFPlanning Case 14 -031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF, ATTACHMENT F.PDF, ATTACHMENT G.PDF, ATTACHMENT H.PDF, ATTACHMENT I.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungEd Werner Regular City Council AgendaOctober 27, 2014 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:6.7.8.8.A.Documents:8.B.Documents:8.C.Documents:8.D.Documents:8.E. Documents: 9. 10. Page 1 of 2 DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director SUBJECT: TCAAP Update Regulations and Policies The original schedule for Regulations and Policies anticipated that the City Council would be providing final comments on the draft zoning on November 17, 2014. At this point, that appears unlikely and additional meetings will be needed to finalize the TCAAP zoning. Staff is working on revising the schedule which will likely include continuing zoning meetings into 2015. Remaining topics for City Council discussion and final approval include: JDA Governance Process Density and Mix of Uses Residential Design Standards Office/Retail Design Standards Flex Office Design Standards Gateway Overlay Design Standards Exterior Materials Street Design and Right-of-Way Requirements Landscaping Requirements Open Space Standards Table of Permitted Uses Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Future Land Use Map Other topics as identified by the City Council The November 3, 2014 Gateway Planning workshop has been postponed so that the City Council can have a discussion with a retail developer and begin a policy discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. STAFF COMMENTS MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Upcoming Meetings Staff and consultants are scheduling work for the regulations and policies component of the master planning process. October 27, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Water and Sewer System Update (Infrastructure) Discuss Residential Densities and Chapters 4-5 (Definitions, Schedule of Uses) November 3, 2014, Special Work Session at 6:00 pm, Council Chambers Discussion with Retail Developer Future Land Use Map Policy Discussion Discuss Chapter 8 (Street Design Standards) Additional regular and special work session meetings will be scheduled to discuss regulations and policies, the infrastructure study, and other TCAAP issues. Topics for future meetings will be identified as those dates draw nearer. Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the special City Council work session at 5:33 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and Ed Werner Absent: Councilmember Dave McClung (excused) Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; and City Clerk Amy Dietl 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Discussion with Commercial Developers Regarding TCAAP Zoning Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that City staff, County staff, and financial consultants have been meeting with commercial and residential developers to gather feedback on land values, absorption rates, and the draft zoning document. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, has prepared a presentation summarizing commercial developer feedback. Kent Carlson, Anderson Companies, and Jason Sell, Cushman & Wakefield, are available to answer questions. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, reviewed the TCAAP zoning map with the Council. She provided the Council with definitions for the various zoning districts as observed by industry standards. Kent Carlson, Anderson Companies, stated that he believed that warehouse distribution on the TCAAP site would have constraints given the infrastructure and access issues to and from the site. He discussed the types of industrial uses he could foresee on the property, such as medical tech or medical manufacturing. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 2 Mayor Grant questioned how the City would go about getting high quality, sustainable jobs on TCAAP. Todd Hanson, Cushman & Wakefield, stated this would be driven by the market and economics. He believed that the TCAAP site is a unique blank slate, and it is like no other site in the metro area. He hoped that it would appeal to precision manufacturing and medical, along with research and development firms. Mr. Carlson encouraged the City to differentiate itself from the competition through setbacks, berming, landscaping, building design, trails and other amenities to attract high end corporations. Mr. Hanson recommended that the flex and office space be merged together to offer greater flexibility to future developers. It was his opinion that long-term health would require flexibility and innovation, while allowing for growth. Discussion ensued regarding spec development verses build to suit development, the height of light industrial buildings, the quality of tip up panels, the size and scale of light industrial properties, along with loading dock areas and potential screening options. Community Development Director Hutmacher summarized the comments provided this evening. B. Grading and Spine Road Design Review Public Works Director Maurer stated that the Kimley Horn Infrastructure Team was present to discuss the grading plan and spine road portions of the TCAAP infrastructure project. He noted that Jon Horn, Project Manager, and Tom Lincoln, Task Leader for Land Development, were present to answer questions. Jon Horn, Kimley-Horn, discussed the proposed design and location for the spine road in detail with the Council. He described how utilities would be brought along each side of the spine road. The alignment of the creek and surrounding drainage was also reviewed. Councilmember Holden questioned why the spine road location was being altered. City Administrator Klaers stated that the original placement on the land use map was an educated guess and that the consultants are now reevaluating the best alignment based on available information on such site elements as the access point at H and the location of wetlands. Public Works Director Maurer provided comment on how the new alignment would impact the properties surrounding the spine road. Councilmember Holden suggested that the spine road be designed for 35 miles per hour traffic. Public Works Director Mauer stated that the road would be engineered for 40 miles per hour traffic but the posted speed would be determined by the State after a speed study. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 3 Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council work session meeting at 6:52 p.m. Mayor Grant reconvened the City Council Work Session meeting at 8:11 p.m. B. PC 14-023 Concept Review – 4200 Round Lake Road – Roberts Management Group City Planner Streff stated that the property being discussed tonight is situated at the northeast corner of the I-35W and I-694 interchange with access from Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard. This property is commonly referred to as the Traverse Business Center site. City Planner Streff indicated that the applicant is proposing two (2) light industrial buildings at this site. Building 1 is proposed at 200,140 square feet and building 2 is proposed at 25,600 square feet for a total of 225,740 square feet. It is the applicant’s vision that the larger of the two buildings would function as a multi-tenant structure with an average of 20% office and the remainder of the space would be used for manufacturing, production, retail sales and service, warehousing and other similar uses. The smaller of the two buildings would function in a very similar manner to the other building; however, this structure would be geared towards smaller production tenants with less office presence. It is the applicant’s hope that the great visibility and interstate access will appeal to potential tenants. City Planner Streff stated as proposed, the buildings would be constructed with tip-up concrete panels with decorative accents that incorporate brick and metal to help offset the large façades of the structures. The applicant is also proposing to use a large amount of glass on the front of the buildings to further enhance the attractiveness of both buildings. The front façade of building 1 is positioned to face I-35W/I-694 and building 2 has its front oriented towards Gateway Boulevard. In order to provide functional space that will serve the needs of both large and small tenants, building 1 is proposed with twenty-five (25) foot to thirty (30) foot sidewalls and building 2 with twenty (20) foot to twenty-five (25) foot sidewalls. City Planner Streff explained that surface parking would be provided on the site as depicted on the site plan that has been submitted by the applicant. The plan shows that the parking needs for this development can be accommodated onsite. Preliminary figures show that 364 parking spaces are required and 382 spaces have been provided. Access to the site has been provided off of Gateway Boulevard in three locations, two of which have been designed to serve both passenger vehicles and semi-truck traffic. City Planner Streff commented that the City Council approved the Traverse Business Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) in July of 2007. This particular PUD called for three (3) phases of development. Phase I consisted of a 203,400 square foot six (6) story office building. Phase II added an additional 261,600 square foot office building with eight (8) stories. The remaining phase III consisted of a 30,000 square foot office building. Phase I and II have both Master PUD approval and Final PUD approval. Phase III only has a Master PUD approval at this ti me. As stated in the current PUD Permit, building permits for Phase I and Phase II were required to be obtained on or before July 30, 2014, to keep the PUD from expiring. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 4 City Planner Streff reported that the PUD for this property has since expired as the timeline for the construction of this development did not met the conditions stated within the PUD. In cases where a PUD approval expires, the property defaults to the underlining zoning district and in this case, back to GB Gateway Business District and standards set forth for this district within the Zoning Ordinance. City Planner Streff indicated that the property located at 4200 Round Lake Road is located within the GB Gateway Business District where manufacturing/processing and office uses are permitted and where retail and warehousing uses are permitted as accessory uses only. Within this district, office uses are permitted to occupy between 25 percent and 50 percent of the total floor area. Retail uses in this district can occupy no more than 15 percent of the total floor area of the building in which they are located. Warehousing is prohibited in this district when the use occupies more than 75 percent of the structure. The project as proposed would be required to use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process as flexibility is being request. Nick Roberts, Roberts Management Group, thanked the Council for reviewing his concept plan. He explained that the current owner does not have any prospects for a large office user, and for this reason, he believed the site could be used to attract high quality businesses to the City. Councilmember Holden did not understand the proposed location of the building on the site. She questioned if the site would be used for distribution. Mr. Roberts stated that one of the benefits of the site is its exposure to I-694 and I-35W. However, there are site complications with the wetland which will force the building to be pushed back. He described the proposed layout of the building and noted that it would be 20% office and 80% production/manufacturing uses. He reiterated that the space would not be used as a distribution center. Councilmember Holmes did not believe that the site would be used for distribution. Mayor Grant discussed the great access to the site as well as the proposed building. He wanted to see some substantial, quality building materials used on the building. Mr. Roberts understood that the City wanted to have a high quality building that would last long- term. He reported that the design would be timeless and something he could be proud of. Councilmember Holmes questioned the timeline for the proposed office/production building. Mr. Roberts anticipated that the timeline was further out than the other project (1235 Red Fox Road) that he is proposing. He described the climate of the office rental market in the metro area. Councilmember Holden supported the building. Councilmember Holmes asked if the City should be concerned with filling this space given the fact that additional office space would be opening up on TCAAP. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 5 Mr. Roberts stated that the ratio he was proposing for office/production space would provide him enough flexibility to meet the needs of the market. He provided comment on his potential development and construction timeline. He reported that he may not construct the building for another eight years. He asked if the 20% office was an agreeable ratio for the City. Councilmember Holmes supported this ratio. Councilmember Holden questioned how this ratio would affect the different buildings. She hoped to see some office space in the small building and at least 20% of the space used for office in the large building. Mr. Roberts did not object to have 20% office space in the larger building and allowing for more flexibility in the smaller building. City Administrator Klaers clarified that the concept approval from the Council was favorable at this time. However, eight years from now, the Council may have a different opinion. Mr. Roberts understood this to be the case. However, he stated that he would not build a 200,000 square foot building until there was a market demand for the space. City Administrator Klaers discussed the cost for the Round Lake Road improvement project. C. PC 14-029 Concept Review – 1235 Red Fox Road – Roberts Management Group City Planner Streff stated that the Roberts Management Group has requested that the City Council review the proposed development concept for the property at 1235 Red Fox Road and provide feedback on the plan. City Planner Streff noted that the property at 1235 Red Fox Road is approximately eight acres in size and is situated at the southeast corner of the Highway 51 and Interstate 694 interchange. The property has frontage along Red Fox Road and can also be accessed from the western terminus of Northwoods Drive. Roberts Management Group has provided two preliminary site plans depicting how they propose to develop the property. The plans are substantially the same, with only minor differences between the two in terms of parking lot layout and the footprint area of one of the proposed buildings. City Planner Streff explained that the Roberts Management Group is proposing to construct two multi-tenant light industrial buildings on the property. Building 1 would have a footprint of between 50,000 and 52,500 square feet and Building 2 would be approximately 45,000 square feet in size for a total of 95,000 to 97,500 square feet of structure coverage on the lot. The two proposed buildings would be similar in design and use. The applicant expects that on average 20 percent of each tenant space will be used for office purposes with the remaining space being used for a variety of activities, such as manufacturing, production, warehousing, and retail sales/services. Given the visibility of the property from Interstate 694 and Highway 51, Roberts Management Group believes the project could attract some commercial showroom and retail tenants as well. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 6 City Planner Streff stated that the proposed buildings would be constructed with tilt-up concrete panels. Brick and decorative metal would be used as accent materials to provide architectural interest to the building façades and a significant percentage of the front façades would be glazing. Building 1 would have a northwest orientation facing the I-694/Hwy 51 interchange, and Building 2 would be oriented to face east towards the Northwoods Office Building and Red Fox Road. City Planner Streff noted that parking would be provided on surface parking lots. The preliminary figures show that between 148 and 152 parking stalls would be required depending on the proposed footprint area of Building 1. Both site plans accommodate more than the required amount of parking for the proposed development. Option 1 would provide 229 stalls and Option 2 would include 187 stalls. City Planner Streff stated that the property at 1235 Red Fox Road is located in the I-Flex Zoning District. The purpose of this district among other things is to attract new development that is compatible with existing development in the district in terms of use, performance, character, quality and appearance of buildings and sites. Currently, this district is primarily comprised of a mix of office and light industrial buildings. Examples of businesses in the I-Flex District include Smiths Medical, IntriCon, and International Paper. City Planner Streff explained that office and manufacturing uses are permitted as principal uses in the district, retail sales and services are allowed as an accessory use, and warehousing is permitted as a conditional use. Warehousing is allowed by Conditional Use Permit only if the use occupies no more than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building in which it is located. City Planner Streff noted that proposals for new construction in the I-Flex District are required to use the Planned Unit Development or the Conditional Use Permit process. In this case, Roberts Management Group would be required to apply for a PUD in order to allow for two principal buildings on the property. In addition, a Conditional Use Permit application would be processed concurrently to allow for warehousing uses in the proposed buildings. Mayor Grant asked if the developer had any comments. Mr. Roberts asked if the warehouse portion of the building could be made an accessory use instead of a conditional use. City Planner Streff explained that this would require a zoning change or code amendment. Councilmember Holden was not in favor of making a zoning change or a code amendment. She had concerns with the proposed development as the City has a great deal of office space in close proximity. She feared how traffic would be impacted along Northwoods Drive. Mr. Roberts discussed how the dock areas were shared between the two buildings, noting the truck traffic would flow to Red Fox Road. It was his hope to keep truck traffic to the west and away from Northwoods Drive. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 7 Mayor Grant recommended that the dock area be screened along the property line. He wanted to see a high quality building constructed on all sides as it would be viewed from the adjacent office buildings. Councilmember Holmes questioned if City Code was clear enough when addressing a potential distribution center. Councilmember Holden read the current City Code regarding warehousing and manufacturing. Councilmember Holmes was in favor of the City Attorney reviewing this language to provide further clarity. Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that it would be difficult for the City to monitor office/warehousing percentages, especially in buildings that have turnover. Councilmember Holmes recommended that the dock areas be more heavily screened. Councilmember Holden stated that the Council would have to decide if additional warehouses would be allowed before recommendations are made on the screening. Mayor Grant summarized the comments noting that the Council did not object to the plan except for the warehouse/manufacturing percentage needing further discussion and concerns being raised about traffic and circulation within and around the site. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES City Administrator Klaers explained that the Council would need to hold a special work session to further discuss the budget. He reported that the proposed maximum tax levy would have to be approved by the Council on September 29th. Councilmember Holmes suggested that the budget discussion be held at the work session on September 22nd or at the September 29th Council meeting. The Council agreed to hold the budget discussion on September 29th. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the special City Council work session at 9:25 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Amy Dietl David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:02 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and Ed Werner Absent: Councilmember Dave McClung (excused) Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; Parks and Recreation Manager Michelle Olson; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; and City Clerk Amy Dietl PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS A. Sheriff Bostrom – Update on Police Services Sheriff Bostrom, Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office, stated that he appreciated the Council’s time and provided an update on recent Night to Unite activities that were held in Arden Hills. He reviewed the County prescription medications disposal program and encouraged the public to turn in their unused prescription medications at the Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center. He ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 2 described the technological advancements being made with regard to computer aided dispatching. He explained that Ramsey County would be upgrading its records management system to meet the growing needs of the community. He explained that the Sheriff’s Department continues to hire based on the highest level of character while training its officers to have the highest professional skill level. He thanked the Council for their continued support. Councilmember Holden questioned if the public should be dialing 911 for non-emergency situations. Sheriff Bostrom stated that the sheriff’s department has additional bandwidth available and is now taking non-emergency calls at 911. Councilmember Holden requested that the Ramsey County speed trailer be placed throughout the City of Arden Hills on a more frequent basis. She asked for further information on the Code Red System. Randy Gustafson, Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office, provided the Council with additional information on the Code Red System. Councilmember Holmes thanked the Sheriff’s Department for the ethical and professional services provided to the City of Arden Hills. She thanked the County for its presence during Night to Unite but requested a larger daily presence in Arden Hills’ neighborhoods throughout the remainder of the year. Sheriff Bostrom commented that he would work to more closely meet the goals of the Council with regard to proactive policing. Councilmember Werner discussed a recent ride along that he completed with a deputy. Mayor Grant thanked Sheriff Bostrom for his presentation. He recommended that information on the new computer aided dispatching information be well-communicated to the public. He also encouraged residents to dispose of their unused prescription medications at the Sheriff’s Department. B. Proclamation in Recognition of Michelle Olson, Parks and Recreation Manager Mayor Grant read a proclamation recognizing Michelle Olson for her 15 years of dedicated service to the City of Arden Hills. The Council wished Ms. Olson well on her move. 4. STAFF COMMENTS A. TCAAP Update Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that City staff, County staff, and financial consultants have been meeting with commercial and residential developers to get feedback on ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 3 land values, absorption rates, and the draft zoning document. Developers will be asked to attend work sessions to allow the City Council an opportunity to ask questions and have a direct dialogue with developers. Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that special and regular City Council work sessions have been scheduled to discuss issues related to the Master Plan and City infrastructure. Discussion topics are tentatively planned as follows: September 8, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Spine Road and Grading Design Review (Infrastructure) Discussion of Commercial Development Standards September 15, 2014, Regular Work Session at 5:00 pm, Council Chambers Workshop with Gateway Planning o Review of Chapters 1-5 (Introduction, Components of the Code, Administration, Definitions, Schedule of Uses) o Present Zoning Chapters 6-7, 9-11 (Building and Site Development Standards, Building Design Standards, Open Space Standards, Streetscape and Landscape Standards, Sign Standards) September 22, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:00 pm, Council Chambers (4th of 5 Mondays) Discuss Commercial Districts (components of Chapters 6, 7, 10, 11) September 29, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room County Road I and Thumb Road Design Review (Infrastructure) Discuss Residential Districts (components of Chapters 6, 7, 10, 11) October 13, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Stormwater System Update (Infrastructure) Final Discussion Chapters 6-7, 10-11 (Building and Site Development Standards, Building Design Standards, Streetscape and Landscape Standards, Sign Standards) October 20, 2014, Regular Work Session at 5:00 pm, Council Chambers Discuss Chapter 9 (Open Space Standards) October 27, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Water and Sewer System Update (Infrastructure) Final review of Chapter 9 (Open Space Standards) November 10, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Discuss Chapter 8 (Street Design Standards) November 17, 2014, Regular Work Session at 5:00 pm, Council Chambers Final Workshop with Gateway Planning o Final Review of Chapter 8 (Street Design Standards) o Review entire document ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 4 November 24, 2014, Special Work Session at 5:30 pm, Community Room Spine Road/County Road I/Thumb Road Update (Infrastructure) Final review of draft zoning document, future land use map, and Comprehensive Plan amendment in preparation for public hearings at December 3, 2014, Planning Commission Meeting Staff anticipated that additional regular and special work sessions will be scheduled to discuss TCAAP issues. Future meeting topics will be defined as those dates draw nearer. B. Transportation Update Public Works Director Maurer reported that Hamline Avenue was scheduled to have the final striping and arrows completed later this week. He indicated that the advanced warning sign on Highway 96 was fully installed and would be operational in the next week. He explained that the concrete repair on Highway 96 was nearing completion and that the crosswalks would be painted over the next three weeks. C. State of the City Update Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that two State of the City events will be held this year: Thursday, September 18, 7:30 to 9:00 am at Flaherty’s Arden Bowl, and Tuesday, September 23, 6:30 to 8:00 pm at City Hall. Community Development Director Hutmacher noted that Councilmembers will give presentations covering the TCAAP project, improvements to County Road E, current development projects, planned transportation improvements, and the Arden Hills Foundation. Arden Hills businesses and residents are encouraged to attend one of the events (the presentations will be the same at both events). 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. July 14, 2014, Special Work Session B. July 14, 2014, Regular City Council C. July 21, 2014, Work Session D. July 28, 2014, Special Work Session E. July 28, 2014, Regular City Council Councilmember Holmes noted a change to the July 14, 2014, special work session minutes stating that on page 6, it should read, “the applicant was in attendance but due to time constraints the Council could not address this item”. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the July 14, 2014, special work session minutes as amended, the July 14, 2014, regular City Council minutes, July 21, 2014, work session minutes, July 28, 2014, special work session minutes; and July 28, ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 5 2014, regular City Council minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Request for Proposals (RFP) – Recycling Services C. Motion to Approve Round Lake Road Area Improvement – Payment #3 D. Motion to Approve Valentine Park Improvements – Final Payment #5 MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Werner seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 7. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TCAAP Development Discussion Opportunity for Residents Mayor Grant stated that under the Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding the TCAAP development. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. B. Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities City Administrator Klaers stated that delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated August 6, 2014, were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by August 29, 2014. Utility accounts with an unpaid delinquent balance after August 29, 2014, are to be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property taxes payable in 2015. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an eight percent penalty. A list of remaining delinquent utility accounts, as of September 3, 2014, is attached. The City will be requesting that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the respective properties. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 6 MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Werner seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2014-043 – adopting and certifying quarterly special assessments for delinquent utilities to Ramsey County. The motion carried (4-0). 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Rolling Hills Area – Order Feasibility Report Public Works Director Maurer stated that the draft 2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contains an item for a 2015 PMP in the Rolling Hills area. Public Works Director Maurer commented that as with previous PMP’s, the Feasibility Report will include a geotechnical investigation, a topographic survey of the area, an analysis of the existing sewer and water systems, preliminary design of the street and drainage improvement, cost estimate and proposed assessments. The Feasibility Report will be prepared by John Anderson, Assistant City Engineer. Consultant and subcontractor services for the items which cannot be completed by City staff such as a topographic survey, a geotechnical investigation, and AutoCAD services will be obtained. Public Works Director Maurer reported that as part of the Feasibility Report, a neighborhood informational meeting will be held at City Hall. At that meeting an overview of the potential project, timing, and estimated cost and assessments will be presented. Public Works Director Maurer recommended that this project and the Grant Road, Noble Road, Fairview Avenue, and Lake Lane 2015 PMP follow similar, but separate paths through the Feasibility Report phase. If both projects proceed to construction, staff would recommend that the two PMP projects be combined for purposes of bidding and construction to gain the advantages of economy of scale. Councilmember Holmes recommended that the drainage concerns in the Rolling Hills neighborhood be addressed through the proposed project. Public Works Director Maurer suggested that all drainage concerns be brought to Assistant City Engineer Anderson for this project. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Werner seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2014-041 – ordering preparation of the Feasibility Report for the 2015 Pavement Management Program (Rolling Hills area). The motion carried (4-0). B. Grant Road, Noble Road, Fairview Avenue and Lake Lane – Order Feasibility Report Public Works Director Maurer stated that the draft 2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contains an item for a 2015 PMP in the area of Grant Road, Noble Road, Fairview Avenue, and Lake Lane. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 7 Public Works Director Maurer commented that as with previous PMP’s, the Feasibility Report will include a geotechnical investigation, a topographic survey of the area, an analysis of the existing sewer and water systems, preliminary design of the street and drainage improvement, cost estimate, and proposed assessments. The Feasibility Report will be prepared by John Anderson, Assistant City Engineer. Consultant and subcontractor services for the items which cannot be completed by City staff such as a topographic survey, a geotechnical investigation, and AutoCAD services will be obtained. Public Works Director Maurer reported that as part of the Feasibility Report, a neighborhood informational meeting will be held at City Hall. At that meeting an overview of the potential project, timing, and estimated cost and assessments will be presented. Staff recommended that this project and the Rolling Hills area 2015 PMP follow similar but separate paths through the Feasibility Report phase. If both projects proceed to construction, staff would recommend that the two PMP projects be combined for purposes of bidding and construction to gain the advantages of economy of scale. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2014-042 – ordering preparation of the Feasibility Report for the 2015 Pavement Management Program (Grant Road, Noble Road, Fairview Avenue and Lake Lane). The motion carried (4-0). C. Consultant Services for 2015 PMP’s Public Works Director Maurer stated that the previous two items on the agenda were to order Feasibility Reports for the two 2015 PMP areas; the Rolling Hills neighborhood and the Grant Road, Noble Road, and Lake Lane neighborhoods. These two studies will be conducted by City staff with the help of consultants for the services we are unable to perform in-house. Those services include things like a topographic survey, a geotechnical investigation, and AutoCAD drawing of preliminary plan sheets. Public Works Director Maurer requested a proposal from Elfering and Associates, who have provided similar services on the 2011 and 2013 PMP’s, for specific services that the Assistant City Engineer is unable to complete by himself. The proposal for the Rolling Hills area is $74,225.00 and the proposal for Grant Road/Noble Road and Lake Lane is $48,255.00. These are hourly, not-to-exceed, proposals. It is understood that the work by Elfering staff is under the direction of the Assistant City Engineer. Public Works Director Maurer explained that for geotechnical services staff requested proposals for each PMP area from three firms the City has worked with in the past. The firms are Braun Intertech, Element Materials Technology, and Independent Testing Technologies. Element submitted the low quote for both PMP areas; $3,450.00 for the Rolling Hills Area and $2,850.00 for the Grant Road/Noble Road and Lake Lane area. Staff would recommend that Council authorize entering into contracts with Elfering and Associates and Element Materials Technology for services relating to the Feasibility Report preparation for the two 2015 PMP areas. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to authorize entering into contracts with Elfering and Associates and ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 8 Element Materials Technology for engineering/surveying and geotechnical work for the two 2015 PMP Feasibility Reports. The maximum cost for services by each firm on the two PMP Feasibility Reports is as follows: Rolling Hills Area Grant Road/Noble Road/Lake Lane Element Materials Testing $ 3,450.00 $ 2,850.00 Elfering and Associates $74,225.00 $48,255.00 TOTAL $77,675.00 $51,105.00 The motion carried (4-0). 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Holden was pleased that the former Carroll’s Furniture building had new windows. Mayor Grant discussed the new businesses open to the public at Lexington Station. ADJOURN MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the regular City Council meeting at 8:04 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Amy Dietl David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Pro-Tem Holmes called to order the City Council Work Session meeting at 5:04 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant (arrived at 5:39 p.m.); Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung, and Ed Werner Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; and City Clerk Amy Dietl 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Workshop with Gateway Planning Review of Chapters 1-5 Present Chapters 6-7, 9-11 Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that tonight’s meeting is the second workshop with Brad Lonberger, Gateway Planning. She encouraged the Councilmembers to discuss elements of Chapters 1-5 with Mr. Lonberger. She indicated that the remaining draft chapters, with the exception of Chapter 8 (Street Design Standards) will be presented as well. Chapter 6 – Building and Site Development Standards Chapter 7 – Building Design Standards Chapter 9 – Open Space Standards Chapter 10 – Streetscape and Landscape Standards Chapter 11 – Sign Standards Attachments Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that Chapter 6 is the longest and most detailed of these chapters as it addresses building and site development standards. Consequently, staff has spent the most time reviewing Chapter 6 of the draft document, and less time so far has ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 2 been spent reviewing the remaining chapters. She stated that she anticipated that further revisions will be necessary throughout the document. Brad Lonberger, Gateway Planning, requested additional feedback from the Council on Chapters 1 through 5. Mayor Pro-Tem Holmes expressed concern with how staff would merge the City’s current code with the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC). Mr. Lonberger reported that he was working through this issue with the City and the Joint Development Authority (JDA). He explained it was permissible for the City to have a redevelopment code for this specific area. Community Development Director Hutmacher commented that anything in TCAAP not covered in the TRC code would revert back to the original City Code. Mayor Pro-Tem Holmes requested further clarification on what the build-to zone would be. Mr. Lonberger explained that he would address this matter in his presentation. He then provided the Council with a detailed presentation on Chapters 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11. He reported that the term “build-to” referred to builders “building to” specific setbacks and guidelines. He requested comment from the Council on Chapter 6. Discussion ensued regarding how the build-to ranges would work as the site develops. Mayor Pro-Tem Holmes feared that the build-to ranges were too stringent and did not offer enough flexibility. Mr. Lonberger reported that it was quite common for Town Center areas to have build-to requirements to ensure the site develops in a manner that closely follows the City’s vision. Mayor Grant arrived at the meeting at 5:39 p.m. Councilmember Holden asked if the roads would have curb cuts in the pedestrian friendly or pedestrian priority areas along the spine road. Mr. Lonberger stated that the preference would be to have no curb cuts given the level of traffic along the spine road. He anticipated that the number of driveways in the Town Center would also be minimized. Mayor Grant questioned if the density would be controlled by the proposed setbacks. Mr. Lonberger indicated that this was a tool that could be used to assist with controlling density. Community Development Director Hutmacher reviewed how setbacks would be used to achieve a number of things in various zoning districts, such as walkability, increased green space, or improved parking. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 3 Mayor Grant inquired what communities have been developed with similar setbacks as was being proposed for the Town Center District. Mr. Lonberger indicated that he would provide the Council with a list of communities. Councilmember Holden believed that this would be helpful as she was having a hard time visualizing the proposed setbacks and how it would impact storefronts, sidewalks and pedestrian access. Councilmember Holmes expressed concern with the proposed residential setbacks. Mr. Lonberger reviewed the proposed residential area setbacks in detail with the Council. Councilmember Holden feared that if alley ways were created that a sense of community within the neighborhoods would be lost. Community Development Director Hutmacher anticipated that resident lot widths in the Neighborhood Districts would primarily be at least 50 feet to allow for front loading garages with setbacks to allow for parking on the driveway. Councilmember Holden questioned how snow storage would be addressed in the Town Center. Public Works Director Maurer stated that larger snow falls would have to be removed from the area and could perhaps be brought to AHATS. He commented that the County would be responsible for removing snow from the spine road. Mayor Grant did not want to see canvas awnings in the Town Center area. Mr. Lonberger reported that the awning material can be greater defined within the code. Councilmember Holmes asked if buildings would be four or five stories within TCAAP. Mr. Lonberger reviewed the proposed building heights for the Town Center and for the retail area along the highway. Councilmember Holmes suggested that the guidelines for the Flex Office District along the highway be more detailed, as was proposed in the Town Center area. Community Development Director Hutmacher anticipated that this would be further addressed after the proper configuration of this area was determined. She stated that staff had spoken with Mr. Lonberger regarding the comments received from the last Council work session. Councilmember Holden was hopeful that the City’s needs would be met through the development of the site and not just the County’s goals. Councilmember McClung wanted to see quality residential development on the site as this will help play a role in the jobs that will be created. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 4 Mr. Lonberger reviewed Chapters 7, 9, 10, and 11 of the code with the Council. Councilmember Holden requested that staff investigate the window/glass section further to see if there was language that would recommend window material be selected that would reduce the impact on migrating birds. Mr. Lonberger stated that he would research this matter further. Councilmember Holden recommended that this portion of the code address building color. She wanted to see the development of this site done well without tacky or trendy colored buildings. She recommended that an area near the Highway 96 entrance be designated as pedestrian friendly as this would be the entrance for current Arden Hills’ residents into the TCAAP site. Mr. Lonberger understood the Council’s concerns and also noted that EIFS would not be allowed within TCAAP. Councilmember Holden suggested that the number of drive thru bays be reconsidered. Mayor Grant commented that current code allowed for only one auto-oriented bay. Councilmember McClung recommended that Council and staff be thinking long-term for this site with the zoning and guidelines for TCAAP. Mr. Lonberger understood this concern as the property would be developed in phases. Councilmember Holden inquired if structured parking was anticipated for the development. Community Development Director Hutmacher reported that this issue would need to be investigated further by staff. She discussed the tremendous expense for underground parking structures. Councilmember McClung did not believe the City would dictate if developers did or did not put in structured parking. Councilmember Holden recommended that staff address within the Code who would be responsible for clearing the residential sidewalks. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that a Home Owners Association (HOA) may have to be created for these new neighborhoods to address the maintenance of the sidewalks. This was the direction Pulte chose for their new development. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed density per acre for TCAAP. Councilmember Holmes believed that seven units per acre were too much. She suggested that one to four units be allowed per acre. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 5 Councilmember Holden asked when additional information from the Parks Commission would be available. She indicated that this would be good information for the Council to have when making decisions on the zoning code. Councilmember Holmes inquired why the City would be requiring developers to place balconies on multi-family residential buildings. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that this was a sign of high quality design and would provide variation to the building. Councilmember Holden suggested that staff speak with local developers regarding this matter in order to gain additional feedback on the balcony situation. Discussion returned to the sidewalk width in the Town Center. Councilmember Holden did not believe that a five or six foot sidewalk would work in this area, especially considering room would be needed for snow storage in the winter months and dining space in the summer months. Councilmember Holmes wanted to see the sign code closely examined as the City has had issues with signs. Mayor Grant suggested that LED lights be addressed within the TRC sign code. He stated that he was anti-streaming or movement signs as well. Mr. Lonberger stated that the code could address the level of foot candle intensity for LED’s. Councilmember Holden asked who would own the property zoned Civic. Mr. Lonberger indicated that this property would be used for water treatment and was being viewed as an open space. Community Development Director Hutmacher anticipated that park and recreation spaces would be owned by the City. Councilmember Holden recommended that staff more closely define the landscaping requirements in the residential neighborhoods within the TRC. Mayor Grant discussed the length of the current zoning document. He appreciated the detail provided by staff. Councilmember Holden stated that she would like additional information on how Neighborhood Transition property would be developed. Community Development Director Hutmacher indicated that staff would review this zoning district further and provide the Council with additional information at a future meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 6 Mr. Lonberger added that as the Master Planning process was wrapping up, staff would be able to provide the Council with more visuals. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Councilmember McClung stated that the Ramsey County League of Local Government would be holding their State of the Water Program on September 25th at 6:00 p.m. Councilmember Holmes discussed the upcoming State of the City meetings. She requested that the Council assign the discussion topics. The Council decided on assignments of meeting topics. Councilmember McClung indicated that he could attend the evening State of the City, but would not be able to attend the day session. Mayor Grant requested that staff create slides showing the cleanup of the TCAAP site for the State of the City meetings. City Administrator Klaers provided the Council with the 2015 draft budget and noted that it would be brought back for approval at the September 29th Council meeting. He discussed an upcoming emergency management training exercise that would be held in New Brighton. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council work session at 8:12 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Amy Dietl David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CLOSED CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 5:30 PM - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the special closed City Council work session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung, and Ed Werner Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust’s Appointed Attorney John Baker (Greene Espel); Janine Wetzel Kimble (Greene Espel); Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; and Associate Planner Matthew Bachler 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Council accepted the agenda as presented. 2. AGENDA ITEMS A. TAT Properties Ltd and 1201 East County Road E vs. City of Arden Hills The City Council and staff received a briefing from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust appointed attorney, John Baker, attorney for the law firm Greene Espel regarding the claim, which is a challenge to the PUD amendment denial. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the special closed City Council work session at 6:12 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Patrick Klaers David Grant City Administrator Mayor Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CLOSED CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 5:15 PM - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the special closed City Council work session at 5:17 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung, and Ed Werner Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sue Iverson; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; and City Attorneys Joel Jamnik and Tom Scott 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Council accepted the agenda as presented. 2. AGENDA ITEMS A. Litigation Regarding Assessment Appeals The City Council and staff received a briefing from City Attorneys Joel Jamnik and Tom Scott regarding assessment appeals litigation with the Round Lake Road improvement project. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the special closed City Council work session at 5:56 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Patrick Klaers David Grant City Administrator Mayor Page 1 of 1 DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims & Payroll Requested Action: 1. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item – Claims and Payroll Supporting Documents: Payroll 2014 Payroll #22 ............................................................................... $ 80,119.94 Total Payroll $ 80,119.94 Accounts Payable Claims Through 10/24/2014 Paid Claims (Check No 0 Sales/Use Tax) ............................................. $ 44.00 Paid Claims (Check No 0 US Bank) ...................................................... $ 3,838.78 Paid Claims (Check No 44058-Check No 44090) ................................. $ 238,649.55 VOID (Check No 44091) ....................................................................... $ 0 Paid Claims (Check No 44092-Check No 44096) ................................. $ 536,700.15 Total Accounts Payable $ 779,323.48 Total Claims $ 859,443.42 CONSENT ITEM - 5A MEMORANDUM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 22 CHECKS DATED: 10/24/14 Biweekly: 10/04/14 - 10/17/14 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,973.73 EFT SIT 2,887.86 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,129.78 EFT FICA Medicare 965.84 EFT TOTAL TAXES 14,957.21 Health Premium 1,768.45 A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 238.33 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 442.66 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,449.44 HSA Health Saving 657.68 Health Care Savings Plan EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 283.31 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 206.08 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,147.07 PERA 4,012.53 EFT ICMA 3,662.89 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 328.13 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 8,617.95 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 132.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 0.00 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 124.45 A/P Check* Public Employee Long Term Care 93.72 A/P Check* UNUM 42.55 A/P Check* AFLAC 163.96 EFT Avesis-Vision Care 5.22 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 593.90 Total Employee Deductions 27,765.57 Net Payroll 0.00 PR Check # Direct Deposit 42,263.17 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 70,028.74 STD/LTD Gross - Up 0.00 Plus City Paid Benefit 10,091.20 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 80,119.94 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 70,028.74 Less Total FSA 2,449.44 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 67,579.30 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,129.78 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 965.84 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 0.00 4,995.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,654.54 341.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 CITY BENEFIT 4,129.78 965.84 5,095.62 1 Ashley Bertrand From:eservices.mdor@state.mn.us Sent:Tuesday, October 14, 2014 3:57 PM To:Ashley Bertrand Subject:Your Recent Return Request This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Sales and Use Tax - Return Submitted Thank you, your request has been submitted. Please allow 3 business days for your return to appear online. Please allow 3 business days from 20-Oct-2014 for your payment to appear online. You can change or cancel this request until 5:00 p.m. Central time. Confirmation Summary Submitted Date and Time: 14-Oct-2014 3:56:43 PM Legal Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Federal Employer ID: 41-6008992 User Who Submitted: Accounting Analyst Type of Request Submitted: Return for 9/30/2014 Account Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Minnesota ID: 9047998 Return Summary Return Confirmation Number: 1-688-415-872 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 30-Sep-2014 Projected Amount/Credit Due: $44.00 Payment Summary Payment Confirmation Number: 0-346-238-592 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 30-Sep-2014 Payment Amount: $44.00 Payment Type: Return Payment Date: 20-Oct-2014 Bank Name: US BANK NA Bank Account Number: ********9377 2 Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Sales and Use Tax Division at (Metro Area) 651-296-6181, (Greater Minnesota) 800-657-3777, (TTY Users) Call 711 for Minnesota Relay, or (email) SalesUse.Tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going to the History Tab. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. Accounts Payable User: Printed: ashley.bertrand 10/23/2014 2:06 PM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0285 Xcel Energy 10/17/2014ACH 428600274 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 3,441.41 429152268 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 1,314.53 429152268 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 535.86 429152268 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 1,012.60 429152268 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 1,641.30 429152268 September 2014 Utility Bill September 2014 Utility Bill 382.49 8,328.19 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 1125 Bolton & Menk, Inc.10/17/2014ACH 0170318 September 2014 MS4 Compliance September 2014 MS4 Compliance 780.00 0170318 September 2014 MS4 Compliance September 2014 MS4 Compliance 780.00 1,560.00 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 4447 Braun Intertec Corporation 10/17/2014ACH B007680 Round Lake Road August 2014 MN DOT Testing Round Lake Road August 2014 MN DOT Testing 2,724.63 2,724.63 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4447: 5584 Kyle Howard 10/17/2014ACH 10132014-KH September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 152.32 152.32 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5584: 7501 Kelly & Lemmons, P.A.10/17/2014ACH 41288 September 2014 Prosecution September 2014 Prosecution 2,238.60 2,238.60 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: 2597 AARP 10/17/201444058 10152014-AARP October 2014 AARP Class October 2014 AARP Class 305.00 305.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44058: UB*00102 Eleanor Andersen Trustee 10/17/201444059 Refund Check 212.20 212.20 0.00Total for Check Number 44059: 0131 Beisswenger's How-To Store 10/17/201444060 504444 PW Supplies PW Supplies 144.35 504445 PW Supplies PW Supplies 79.65 224.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44060: 5709 Central Roofing Company 10/17/201444061 4792 City Hall Repair City Hall Repair 775.00 775.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44061: Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0296 City of Arden Hills 10/17/201444062 10132014-CAH September 2014 Petty Cash Rec September 2014 Petty Cash Rec 16.62 10132014-CAH September 2014 Petty Cash Rec September 2014 Petty Cash Rec 67.89 10132014-CAH September 2014 Petty Cash Rec September 2014 Petty Cash Rec 14.00 98.51 0.00Total for Check Number 44062: 6200 Flaherty's Arden Bowl 10/17/201444063 FAB3473 2014 State of the City Meeting 2014 State of the City Meeting 600.00 600.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44063: FPTC Flexible Pipe Tool Company 10/17/201444064 17919 Sewer Camera Repair Sewer Camera Repair 2,737.60 2,737.60 0.00Total for Check Number 44064: UB*00103 Kim Gruetzmacher 10/17/201444065 Refund Check 170.00 170.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44065: UB*00101 Mary Johnson 10/17/201444066 Refund Check 111.32 111.32 0.00Total for Check Number 44066: 8081 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 10/17/201444067 6115526 August 2014 TCAAP Charges August 2014 TCAAP Charges 1,760.00 1,760.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44067: 0916 Lakes Country Service Coop 10/17/201444068 CI073HA9-1114 November 2014 Health Insurance November 2014 Health Insurance 3,452.00 CI073HB7-1114 November 2014 Health Insurance November 2014 Health Insurance 1,851.00 CI073HE1-1114 November 2014 Health Insurance November 2014 Health Insurance 3,028.00 8,331.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44068: 1197 McFarland Hanson Inc.10/17/201444069 232523 City Hall Supplies City Hall Supplies 77.28 232536 City Hall Supplies City Hall Supplies 77.28 154.56 0.00Total for Check Number 44069: 5443 Metro Products, Inc.10/17/201444070 102710 PW Supplies PW Supplies 216.84 216.84 0.00Total for Check Number 44070: 1302 Meyer Contract Inc.10/17/201444071 10132014-MC Payment #4: Round Lake Road Area ImprovementPayment #4: Round Lake Road Area Improvement 27,236.72 10132014-MC Payment #4: Round Lake Road Area ImprovementPayment #4: Round Lake Road Area Improvement 118,255.63 10132014-MC Payment #4: Round Lake Road Area ImprovementPayment #4: Round Lake Road Area Improvement 26,891.95 172,384.30 0.00Total for Check Number 44071: 1058 MIDC Enterprises 10/17/201444072 I0035490 PW Supplies PW Supplies 16.30 16.30 0.00Total for Check Number 44072: 0413 Newman Traffic Signs 10/17/201444073 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription TI-0278208 PW Street Signs PW Street Signs 89.50 89.50 0.00Total for Check Number 44073: 1110 Pitney Bowes 10/17/201444074 09232014 September 2014 Postage September 2014 Postage 547.13 09232014 September 2014 Postage September 2014 Postage 19.99 09232014 September 2014 Postage September 2014 Postage 593.62 1,160.74 0.00Total for Check Number 44074: 0811 Ramsey County 10/17/201444075 EMCOM-003526 September 2014 Fleet Support Fee September 2014 Fleet Support Fee 24.96 EMCOM-003576 September 2014 911 Dispatch September 2014 911 Dispatch 4,671.37 EMCOM-003591 September 2014 CAD System Charges September 2014 CAD System Charges 358.00 PRRLG-001231 2014 Recycling Fees 2014 Recycling Fees 1,282.00 6,336.33 0.00Total for Check Number 44075: 5561 Rick Johnson Deer and Beaver Inc. 10/17/201444076 10012014-RJ September 2014 Deer Removal September 2014 Deer Removal 115.00 115.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44076: 0751 Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.10/17/201444077 286844 AT&T @ Cummings August Escrow Charges AT&T @ Cummings August Escrow Charges 1,574.12 286845 AT&T @ Cummings August Escrow Charges AT&T @ Cummings August Escrow Charges 521.81 286845 T-Mobile @ Red Fox August Escrow Charges AT&T @ Cummings August Escrow Charges 772.76 2,868.69 0.00Total for Check Number 44077: 0327 Staples Business Advantage 10/17/201444078 3242888967 Office Supplies Office Supplies 136.29 136.29 0.00Total for Check Number 44078: UB*00100 Sandra Swaab 10/17/201444079 Refund Check 4.05 4.05 0.00Total for Check Number 44079: 3099 Tri-State Bobcat, Inc.-Little Canada 10/17/201444080 E16268 PW Rental PW Rental 3,415.50 3,415.50 0.00Total for Check Number 44080: 217,226.47 0.00Total for 10/17/2014: 0189 Gopher State One-Call, Inc.10/24/2014ACH 124573 September 2014 Locates September 2014 Locates 154.43 124573 September 2014 Locates September 2014 Locates 154.42 308.85 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0225 Lillie Suburban Newspapers 10/24/2014ACH 09302014-LSN1 PC 14-031 Expenses PC 14-031 Expenses 47.25 09302014-LSN2 State of the City Expenses State of the City Expenses 563.20 610.45 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0225: 0320 Health Partners 10/24/2014ACH Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 52235502 November 2014 Dental Premium November 2014 Dental Premium 1,257.00 1,257.00 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0382 ICMA Retirement Trust - 106944 10/24/2014ACH PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employer Percent 401 341.04 PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee Percent 401 294.00 635.04 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA Retirement Trust- #302482 10/24/2014ACH PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee Deduction 2,872.70 PR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.10.2014 ICMA Employee Percent 496.19 3,368.89 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0930 Miracle Recreation Equip. Co.10/24/2014ACH 754941 Playground Equipment Parts Playground Equipment Parts 383.38 383.38 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0930: 1223 Adam's Pest Control, Inc.10/24/2014ACH 926572 October 2014 Pest Control October 2014 Pest Control 62.54 62.54 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1223: 1300 UniFirst Corporation 10/24/2014ACH 090 0221047 October 2014 Mat Service October 2014 Mat Service 66.60 66.60 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1300: 2129 Elfering & Associates 10/24/2014ACH 2011 2013 PMP September 2014 Charges 2013 PMP September 2014 Charges 1,930.00 2012 10/96 September 2014 Charges 10/96 September 2014 Charges 300.00 2014 AHATS Water Connection September 2014 ChargesAHATS Water Connection September 2014 Charges 805.00 2016 2015 PMP September 2014 Charges 2015 PMP September 2014 Charges 4,652.50 7,687.50 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2129: 2249 Terry Maurer 10/24/2014ACH 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 11.76 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 3.36 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 3.64 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 3.92 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 29.24 10132014-TM September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 9.24 10132014-TM2 September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 7.84 10132014-TM2 September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 80.64 10132014-TM2 September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement September 2014 Mileage Reimbursement 8.96 158.60 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2249: 5173 Badger Meter, Inc.10/24/2014ACH 1016423 Q3 2014 Service Charges Q3 2014 Service Charges 429.75 429.75 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5173: 5643 Ryan Streff 10/24/2014ACH 10212014-RS September 2014 Expense Reimbursement September 2014 Expense Reimbursement 269.84 10212014-RS September 2014 Expense Reimbursement September 2014 Expense Reimbursement 11.20 281.04 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5643: Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription JOHC Johnson Controls 10/24/2014ACH 1-14850091979 City Hall Repair City Hall Repair 1,710.80 1,710.80 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: 0478 Truck Utilities Mfg. Company 10/24/2014ACH 0274655 CIP Purchase: One Ton Truck CIP Purchase: One Ton Truck 39,762.00 39,762.00 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0478: 2129 Elfering & Associates 10/24/2014ACH 2013 Round Lake Rpad September 2014 Charges Round Lake Rpad September 2014 Charges 26,395.00 2015 2015 PMP September 2014 Charges 2015 PMP September 2014 Charges 7,875.00 34,270.00 0.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2129: CANO Canon Solutions America 10/24/201444081 4013990442 10.28.14 Through 12.31.14 Copier Maintenance 10.28.14 Through 12.31.14 Copier Maintenance 280.00 4013990442-2015 01.01.15 Thru 01.27.15 Copier Maintenance 01.01.15 Thru 01.27.15 Copier Maintenance 140.00 420.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44081: 5709 Central Roofing Company 10/24/201444082 4862 City Hall Repair City Hall Repair 560.00 560.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44082: 0546 Dakota County Tech College 10/24/201444083 00121039 PW Training PW Training 400.00 400.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44083: 5713 Flagship Recreation LLC 10/24/201444084 F3353 Playground Equipment Replacement Playground Equipment Replacement 224.00 224.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44084: 6200 Flaherty's Arden Bowl 10/24/201444085 FAB3473-2 2014 State of the City Meeting 2014 State of the City Meeting 108.00 108.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44085: 1208 Premium Waters, Inc 10/24/201444086 610207-09-14 September 2014 City Hall Supplies September 2014 City Hall Supplies 42.18 613317-09-14 September 2014 City Hall Supplies September 2014 City Hall Supplies 146.97 189.15 0.00Total for Check Number 44086: 0811 Ramsey County 10/24/201444087 PRRLG-001253 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 385.63 PRRLG-001253 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 385.62 PRRLG-001253 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 385.62 PRRLG-001253 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 2014 Special Assessment Admin Charges 385.63 1,542.50 0.00Total for Check Number 44087: 1193 SelectAccount 10/24/201444088 1048639 October 2014 Participant Fees October 2014 Participant Fees 42.20 42.20 0.00Total for Check Number 44088: 0925 T-Mobile 10/24/201444089 10222014-TM September 2014 Tablet Charges September 2014 Tablet Charges 359.91 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 359.91 0.00Total for Check Number 44089: 0576 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 10/24/201444090 M20806 09.08.14 JDA & 09.15.14 CC Mtg & Work Session09.08.14 JDA & 09.15.14 CC Mtg & Work Session 273.50 M20806 09.08.14 JDA & 09.15.14 CC Mtg & Work Session09.08.14 JDA & 09.15.14 CC Mtg & Work Session 343.38 616.88 0.00Total for Check Number 44090: 0319 City of Roseville 10/24/201444092 0219028 Q2 2014 Water Bill Q2 2014 Water Bill 268,418.68 268,418.68 0.00Total for Check Number 44092: 0841 Ehlers & Associates, Inc.10/24/201444093 65590 August 2014 TCAAP Charges August 2014 TCAAP Charges 8,452.50 8,452.50 0.00Total for Check Number 44093: 5665 Metering & Technology Solution 10/24/201444094 1842 PW Water Meter Supplies PW Water Meter Supplies 20,652.00 20,652.00 0.00Total for Check Number 44094: 0243 Metropolitan Council-Waste Water 10/24/201444095 0001031379 April 2014 Wastewater Service Charges April 2014 Wastewater Service Charges 54,070.48 54,070.48 0.00Total for Check Number 44095: 0811 Ramsey County 10/24/201444096 PRMG-002451 Q3 2014 PW Rent Q3 2014 PW Rent 24,654.25 SHRFL-001351 October 2014 RC Sheriff October 2014 RC Sheriff 86,420.24 111,074.49 0.00Total for Check Number 44096: 558,123.23 0.00Total for 10/24/2014: Report Total (58 checks): 775,349.70 0.00 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/23/2014 2:06 PM) NEW BUSINESS – 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator SUBJECT: Cable Franchise Extension Amendment and Cable Franchise Transfer Background The North Suburban Cable Commission (NSCC) is the Joint Powers Commission for the ten (10) member cities. One of the responsibilities of the NSCC is to enforce the terms of the franchise. Currently, the NSCC has been working on the renewal of the cable franchise with Comcast and on the cable franchise transfer that Comcast has requested. Discussion At their October 9, 2014, meeting the NSCC approved a franchise extension agreement and recommended to the member cities that we approve the extension of our cable franchise through December 31, 2016, and that we approve the transfer of the franchise to Midwest Cable/GreatLand Connections. Attached for your information is a NSCC staff memo that outlines some of the key points in the franchise extension agreement. The main reason for the extension is to give both parties more time to reach agreement on the terms for a new franchise. It should be noted that the cable franchise documents, including the MOU referred to in the staff memo, are all on the NSCC website at www.ctv15.org. Also attached are an ordinance that approves the franchise extension until December 31, 2016, and a resolution that conditionally grants the transfer and control of the franchise and television system from Comcast to GreatLand Connections. Michael Bradley, NSCC legal counsel from Bradley Hagen & Gullilson will be at this City Council meeting to make a brief presentation on the proposal and the NSCC recommendation and to answer questions from the City Council. Our NSCC representative, Craig Wilson has been invited to the Council meeting. Recommendation It is recommended that the Cit y Council adopt Ordinance 2014-007, a Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 2014-052, a Resolution Conditionally Granting the Consent to the Transfer of Control of the Cable Television Franchise and Cable Television System from Comcast Corporation to GreatLand Connections, Inc. Attachments Attachment A: NSCC Staff Memo Attachment B: Ordinance No. 2014-007 Attachment C: Resolution No. 2014-052 Staff Memo Cable Franchise Extension Amendment and Cable Franchise Transfer Background A. NSCC Resolution of Legal and Franchising Issues As the Council knows, the North Suburban Communications Commission (“NSCC”) manages the City’s cable television franchise on behalf of the City. On October 10, 2014, the NSCC reached an agreement with Comcast on the resolution of multiple cable franchising issues. The following are some highlights of the agreement: Cable Franchises to be extended through December 31, 2016. Memorandum of Understanding to be extended through December 31, 2016, which will provide approximately $3M in funding over the next 2 years. Franchises and MOU will both roll-over (i.e. month-to-month) if not renewed by extension date (December 31, 2016). The pending administrative hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings, which is part of the formal renewal process will be suspended and all motions withdrawn. The formal renewal process may recommence after July 1, 2015, or the closing of the transfer whichever occurs first. Commitment by the NSCC and Comcast to have at least monthly meetings for the informal cable franchise renewal process. NSCC will receive 1 HD channel with provisions for channel placement and quality. NSCC will have access to the Electronic Programming Guide. Refund of approximately $49,000 total to cable subscribers. PEG Capacity and Rate Order Violation Notices will be withdrawn. I-Net status quo, except Comcast will not be required to extend it to new locations. Consent to the Transfer Application. This agreement is contingent upon the NSCC member cities (1) approving the extension of the cable television franchise ordinance through December 31, 2016; and (2) approving the pending cable franchise transfer application. The NSCC has recommended that the City approve both the extension and the transfer application. Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment The NSCC has prepared a Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment for the City. It extends the existing Cable Television Franchise Ordinance through December 31, 2016, and it requires Comcast’s acceptance. The NSCC has indicated to staff that Comcast has no objection to the amendment. Transfer Application The NSCC has recommended approval of the cable television franchise transfer application, which will transfer ownership of the ultimate parent of the cable franchise from Comcast to a new company that will be called GreatLand Connections. The attached resolution was negotiated and accepted by both the NSCC and Comcast/GreatLand. The resolution lists several contingencies, including the actual closing of the proposed transaction, receipt of necessary federal approvals, executing a guaranty of performance and executing a guaranty regarding rates. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of both the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment and the transfer resolution as presented to the City. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2014-007 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE The City of Arden Hills (the “City”) ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 2, Paragraph 4, entitled “Franchise Term” of the City’s Cable Television Franchise Ordinance (Ord. No. 307), shall be amended as follows: 4. Franchise Term. Pursuant to North Suburban Communications Commission Resolution No. 2014-05 (the “Extension Agreement”), this Franchise shall be in effect through December 31, 2016, unless sooner renewed, revoked or terminated as herein provided. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the acceptance of Comcast of Minnesota, Inc. Adoption Date: Passed and adopted this 27th day of October, 2014. DAVID GRANT, MAYOR ATTEST: AMY DIETL CITY CLERK ACCEPTED: This Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Amendment is accepted and we agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. COMCAST OF MINNESOTA, INC. Dated: ____________________________ By: ________________________________ Its: ______________________________ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014-052 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY GRANTING THE CONSENT TO THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AND CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM FROM COMCAST CORPORATION TO GREATLAND CONNECTIONS, INC. WHEREAS, the North Suburban Communications Commission (hereinafter the “Commission”) is a Joint Powers Commission organized pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59, as amended, and includes the municipalities of Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, Roseville, St. Anthony, and Shoreview, Minnesota (hereinafter, the “Member Cities”); and WHEREAS, Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., (“Franchisee”) holds individual franchises (collectively the “Franchise”) to operate a cable television system (the “System”) in the Member Cities pursuant to separate franchise ordinances (collectively the “Franchise Ordinances”); and WHEREAS, Section 10.5(a) of the Franchise Ordinance requires the Commission’s prior consent to a fundamental corporate change, including a merger or a change in Franchisee’s parent corporation; and WHEREAS, the Commission’s Joint Powers Agreement includes the power to administer and enforce the Franchise on behalf of the Member Cities; and WHEREAS, after a series of transfers, Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., was approved by the Commission as the Franchise holder, pursuant to prior transfer resolutions (the “Prior Transfer Resolutions”). The Prior Transfer Resolutions, the Franchise, the Franchise Ordinance, and the Franchise Extension Agreement together with any applicable resolutions, codes, ordinances, acceptances, acknowledgments, guarantees, amendments, memoranda of understanding, social contracts and agreements, are collectively referred to as the “Franchise Documents;” and WHEREAS, Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”); and WHEREAS, Comcast, as the ultimate parent corporation of Franchisee, has agreed to divest and transfer the Franchise and Cable System to Midwest Cable, Inc., in a process described in the Transfer Application (the “Proposed Transaction”); and 2 WHEREAS, immediately following the closing of the Proposed Transaction, Midwest Cable, Inc., will be renamed GreatLand Connections, Inc., and, for the purposes of this Resolution, the transfer applicant will be referred to as “GreatLand” throughout; and WHEREAS, Comcast filed a Federal Communications Commission Form 394 with the Commission on June 18, 2014, together with certain attached materials, which documents more fully describe the Proposed Transaction and which documents, with their attachments, contain certain promises, conditions, representations and warranties (the “Transfer Application”); and WHEREAS, under the Proposed Transaction, the Franchise and Cable System will stay with Franchisee, and its ultimate parent company will be GreatLand; and WHEREAS, under the Proposed Transaction, the ultimate ownership and control of the Franchisee and the System will change, and it requires the prior written approval of the City; and WHEREAS, Comcast, through its subsidiaries, provided written responses to some of the data requests issued by the Commission, including directing the representatives of the Commission to publicly filed and available information, and information posted to Comcast Corporation and other websites (the “Data Request Responses”); and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the Transfer Application and considered all applicable and relevant factors and has recommended conditional approval by all of the Member Cities; and WHEREAS, in reliance upon the representations made by and on behalf of Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., Comcast, and GreatLand, to the Commission, the City is willing to grant consent to the Proposed Transaction, so long as those representations are complete and accurate; and WHEREAS, the City’s approval of the Proposed Transaction is therefore appropriate if the Franchisee will continue to be responsible for all acts and omissions, known and unknown, under the Franchise Documents and applicable law for all purposes, including (but not limited to) franchise renewal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City’s consent to and approval of the Transfer Application is hereby GRANTED in accordance with the Franchise Ordinances, subject to the following conditions: 1.1 Neither the Franchise, nor any control thereof, nor the System, nor any part of the System located in the City’s public rights-of-way or on City’s property, shall be assigned or transferred, in whole or in part, without filing a written application with the City and/or the Commission and obtaining the City’s prior written approval of such transfer or assignment, but only to the extent required by applicable law. 3 1.2 The City’s approval of the Transfer Application is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, its and/or the Commission’s right to fully investigate and consider during any future franchise renewal process: (i) Franchisee’s financial, technical, and legal qualifications; (ii) Franchisee’s compliance with the Franchise Documents, except as set forth in the Franchise Extension Agreement; and (iii) any other lawful, relevant considerations. 1.3 The City’s approval of the Transfer Application is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any right of the Commission or the Member Cities to consider or raise claims based on Franchisee’s defaults, any failure to provide reasonable service in light of the community’s needs, or any failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the Franchise Documents, or with applicable law, except as set forth in the Franchise Extension Agreement. 1.4 The Commission and the Member Cities waive none of their rights with respect to the Franchisee’s compliance with the terms, conditions, requirements and obligations set forth in the Franchise Documents and in applicable law. The City’s approval of the Transfer Application shall in no way be deemed a representation by the Commission or the Member Cities that the Franchisee is in compliance with all of its obligations under the Franchise Documents and applicable law. 1.5 After the Proposed Transaction, GreatLand and Franchisee will be bound by all the commitments, duties, and obligations, present and continuing, embodied in the Franchise Documents and applicable law. The Proposed Transaction will have no effect on these obligations. 1.6 GreatLand shall provide an executed written certification in the form attached hereto within thirty (30) days after consummation of the Proposed Transaction, guarantying the full performance of the Franchisee. GreatLand shall provide the Commission with written notification that the Proposed Transaction closed within ten (10) days after the closing; 1.7 GreatLand will comply with any and all conditions or requirements applicable to GreatLand set forth in all approvals granted by federal agencies with respect to the Proposed Transaction and Transfer Application (including any conditions with respect to programming agreements), such conditions or requirements to be exclusively enforced at the federal level; 1.8 GreatLand shall provide a written guarantee in the form attached hereto within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Resolution specifying that subscriber rates and charges in the Commission area will not increase as a result of the costs of the Proposed Transaction; 1.9 After the Proposed Transaction is consummated, GreatLand and Franchisee will continue to be responsible for all past acts and omissions, known and unknown, under the Franchise Documents and applicable law for all purposes, including (but not limited to) Franchise renewal to the same extent and in the same manner as before the Proposed 4 Transaction, subject to the terms of the Franchise Extension Agreement. 1.10 Nothing in this Resolution amends or alters the Franchise Documents or any requirements therein in any way, and all provisions of the Franchise Documents remain in full force and effect and are enforceable in accordance with their terms and with applicable law. 1.11 The Proposed Transaction shall not permit GreatLand and Franchisee to take any position or exercise any right with respect to the Franchise Documents and the relationship thereby established with the Member Cities and the Commission that could not have been exercised prior to the Proposed Transaction. 1.12 GreatLand assures that it will cause to be made available adequate financial resources to allow Franchisee to meet its current obligations under the Franchise Documents and enable Franchisee to maintain through 2015 the current operational and customer service levels taken as a whole. 1.13 The Commission is not waiving any rights it may have to require franchise fee payments on present and future services delivered by GreatLand or its subsidiaries and affiliates via the cable system; 1.14 The Commission is not waiving any right it may have related to any net neutrality, open access, and information services issues; 1.15 Receipt of any and all state and federal approvals and authorizations; 1.16 Actual closing of the Proposed Transaction consistent with the transfer application; and Section 2. If any of the conditions or requirements specified in this Resolution are not satisfied, then the City’s recommended consent to, and approval of, the Transfer Application and Proposed Transaction is hereby DENIED and void as of the date hereof. Section 3. Franchisee, GreatLand, or a subsidiary shall reimburse the Commission in accordance with § 10.5(e) of the Franchise Ordinances in an amount not to exceed $15,000. GreatLand and its subsidiaries shall not assert its right to claim that the reimbursement made under this Resolution is a franchise fee for purposes of 47 U.S.C. § 542, nor shall it be offset against or deducted from franchise fee payments made under the Franchise. Section 4. If any of the written representations made to the Commission in the Transfer Application proceeding by (i) Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., (ii) Comcast or (iii) GreatLand, (iv) any subsidiary or representative of the foregoing prove to be materially incomplete, untrue or inaccurate in any respect, it shall be deemed a material breach of the Franchise Documents and applicable law, including, without limitation, revocation or termination of the Franchises. Section 5. This Resolution shall not be construed to grant or imply the City’s consent to any other transfer or assignment of the Franchises or any other transaction that may require the 5 City’s consent under the Franchise Ordinances or applicable law. The Commission and the Member Cities reserve all their rights with regard to any such transactions. Section 6. This Resolution is a final decision on the Transfer Application within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 537. Section 7. The transfer of control of the Franchise from Comcast to GreatLand shall not take effect until the consummation of the Proposed Transaction. Section 8. This Resolution shall be effectively immediately upon its adoption by the City. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk Attachment 1 Form of Guaranty of Performance GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE GreatLand Connections, Inc., as the ultimate parent entity of Comcast of Minnesota, Inc., the Franchisee, upon closing of the proposed transaction (as defined in the North Suburban Communications Commission Resolution No. 2014-052) certifies that it has sufficient financial resources and will at all times make available all necessary financial resources to ensure that the Franchisee has the capabilit y to operate and maintain the System in accordance with the Franchise and applicable laws, regulations codes and standards, and to fully comply at all times with the Franchise, and applicable laws, regulations, codes and standards and guarantees such performance. GreatLand Connections, Inc., agrees that any failure to adhere to this guaranty shall be deemed a violation of the Franchise held by the Franchisee. EXECUTED as of _______________________. GreatLand Connections, Inc. By: ________________________ Name: ______________________ Title: _______________________ Address: Attachment 2 Form of Guaranty Regarding Rates GUARANTY REGARDING RATES GreatLand Connections, Inc., upon closing of the proposed transaction (as defined in the City of Arden Hills Resolution No. 2014-052), guarantees that rates and charges for cable service offered by GreatLand Connections, Inc., the Franchisee in the City of Arden Hills, will not increase as a result of the cost of the proposed transaction. GreatLand Connections, Inc., agrees that any failure to adhere to this guaranty shall be deemed a violation of the Franchise held by the Franchisee. EXECUTED as of _______________________. GreatLand Connections, Inc., By: ________________________ Name: ______________________ Title: _______________________ Address: Page 1 of 2 DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Mounds View High School Trail Accept Proposal from Kimley Horn for Design Services Requested Action Authorize the hiring of Kimley Horn and Associates for design services on the Mounds View High School Trail for a cost not to exceed $47,800. Background/Discussion The City has had an item in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for a trail from the Lake Valentine Road Bridge over 35W to the Mounds View High School (MVHS). The CIP item has been “floating” waiting for the School District and Ramsey County Parks to consider participation in the project as it is crossing Parks property to get to MVHS. However, MnDOT will be replacing the Lake Valentine Road Bridge over 35W in 2015. The new bridge will have a 10 foot wide pedestrian facility on the south side. New Brighton will be constructing pedestrian facilities up to the bridge on the west side. Now would be the time for Arden Hills to consider constructing the trail from the bridge to MVHS for two reasons. First, without this trail construction, the Arden Hills side of the bridge would be the only location without a safe pedestrian facility. The topography in the area just east of the bridge falls away at a significant grade to a wetland complex so the only place currently for a pedestrian is on the narrow shoulder. Secondly, there is a onetime opportunity to coordinate the trail construction with the MnDOT bridge project. Lake Valentine Road on the west side of the bridge is a rural section meaning there is no curb and gutter and only a narrow shoulder adjacent to the travel lane. MnDOT will be rebuilding approximately 500 feet of Lake Valentine Road due to a slight change in the bridge alignment and a small increase in the bridge height. Because of the steep slope off the south side of Lake Valentine Road, there is no opportunity to have a trail separated from the road; therefore, this section of road needs to be an urban section (have barrier concrete curb and gutter on the south side) so the new trail can be pushed adjacent to the curb and gutter thus minimizing the need for a retaining wall to create a level area for the trail to be constructed. NEW BUSINESS – 8B MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Staff has met with MnDOT and they are willing to include concrete curb and gutter on the south side of the section of Lake Valentine Road they need to reconstruct with their bridge project. This will reduce the City’s cost to construct the new trail. Additionally, New Brighton is planning to reconstruct 10th Street (their street name on the west side of the bridge) to Old Highway 8 and some neighborhood streets adjacent to 10th Street. New Brighton has agreed to allow Arden Hills to include the trail construction in their project to take advantage of the economy of scale of a much larger project. (The trail construction cannot be added to the MnDOT project due to the funding that MnDOT is using for the bridge.) Staff has also had a recent meeting with John Ward of the Mounds View Public Schools regarding the potential of constructing this trail segment in 2015. Mr. Ward agreed that the trail segment was important for safe pedestrian movement and indicated he would talk with the School Board at a work session in the fall about participating in the cost. (At the time of this memo staff has not heard back if the discussion is scheduled.) In talking with Mr. Ward, staff also indicated that an assessment to the School District for the trail was also a possibility. At a recent work session Council directed staff to get a proposal from Kimley Horn for design services for the trail segment (Kimley Horn is working with New Brighton on their previously mentioned improvements). Attached is the proposal from Kimley Horn for design services including coordination with MnDOT’s project, all necessary coordination with Rice Creek Watershed District and review and approval of the plans by MnDOT Office of State Aid as that may be the funding source. Staff has assumed that the trail improvement would be combined with New Brighton’s project for bidding purposes, so that is what the Kimley Horn proposal reflects. The total cost not-to-exceed is $47,800. Staff would recommend accepting the proposal from Kimley Horn for design and coordination services for the Mounds View High School trail. Attachments 1. Attachment A- Kimley Horn Proposal Kimley>>>Horn October 9, 2014 Mr. Terry Maurer, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: Professional Services Agreement for Final Design County Road F/Lake Valentine Road Improvements Dear Mr. Maurer: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("KHA" or"the Consultant") is pleased to submit this Professional Services Agreement to the City of Arden Hills ("City" or"the Client") for final design services for Lake Valentine Road. Our project understanding, scope of services, schedule, and estimated fee are provided below. Project Understanding We understand that MnDOT is currently planning for the replacement of the County Road F/Lake Valentine Road bridge over I-35W. As part of the preliminary planning process completed in July 2014, the following improvements were identified within the City of Arden Hills to provide a trail connection from the proposed 1-35W bridge to Mounds View High School: Construction of curb and gutter on the south side of Lake Valentine Road from the 1-35W bridge to Mounds View High School. s Construction of proposed storm sewer to collect stormwater runoff in the new curb and gutter. s Construction of a 10 foot bituminous trail along the back of curb on the south side of Lake Valentine Road. Approximately 600 feet east of the 1-35W bridge, the proposed trail transitions to 8 feet wide and a 6 foot boulevard will be introduced. The limits of the proposed trail are from the 1-35W bridge to Mounds View High School. Construction of a retaining wall and railing along the south side of the proposed bituminous trail for approximately 500 feet. 0 Mill and overlay of approximately 500 feet of Lake Valentine Road east of the MnDOT 1-35W bridge project limits. Scope of Services Based on our understanding of the City's desired outcomes, KHA proposes to complete the final design services specifically set forth below. Task 1 — Data Collection A. Topographic Survey University Kimley>>>Horn Page 2 Kimley-Horn will compile available topographic information available from MnDOT and the previous survey conducted by the City of Arden Hills for the construction of a trail on the south side of Lake Valentine Road. We have assumed that some additional topographic survey will be required to complete the base mapping for the project. A Kimley-Horn subconsultant will obtain the necessary topographic surveying for the final design work. The following is a summary of the information that will be gathered through the topographic survey work: Surface Features such as Signs, Light Poles, Trees, and Mailboxes Profile Streets and Intersections including Edge/Center of Pavement Locate Existing Property Irons and Underground Utilities (Gopher One Call) Survey Utilities (Storm Drain, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Structures) Establish Survey Control and Set Project Benchmarks B. Geotechnical Evaluation A Kimley-Horn sub-consultant will obtain soil borings for the purpose of providing recommendations for the construction of the necessary retaining wall on the south side of Lake Valentine Road. We will utilize geotechnical data available from MnDOT where possible, but have assumed that up to three(3) borings with a total boring depth of up to forty-five (45)feet may be necessary to develop design recommendations for the retaining wall. A report will be prepared outlining the findings of the investigation and providing recommendations for the project improvements. Task 2— Project Management/Agency Coordination A. Project Management Kimley-Horn will provide overall project management and utilize internal project management tools to monitor budgets, staff roles, and responsibilities of all team members throughout the project. We will communicate directly with the City's project manager on a regular basis to discuss design decisions and progress throughout the project. We will manage day-to-day activities and milestones within the project. KHA will prepare monthly billing invoices and provide a summary of the work tasks required and completed at the end of each month. B. Agency Coordination Kimley-Horn will coordinate the final design of the proposed improvements with the MnDOT bridge replacement project. We have assumed this task will include up to two (2) meetings with MnDOT and general coordination with the MnDOT County Road F bridge replacement project team. We have assumed this will include transferring of electronic files at critical design stages to address any discrepancies between the two projects. Task 3 — Final Construction Plans and Specifications A. Preparation of Final Construction Documents We will prepare final construction plans that include plan and profile information for the roadway, trail, retaining wall, and storm sewer improvements. We have assumed that the plans will be included with the City of New Brighton County Road F/10th Street project for bidding purposes. iTi ifi2550 University Avenue - Kimley>>>Horn Page 3 The plans will be prepared consistent with MnDOT State Aid standards. We have assumed the following plan sheets will be necessary: Cover Sheet Statement of Estimated Quantities Typical Sections and Details Alignment Plan Staging/Traffic Control Removals and Erosion Control Street and Storm Sewer Plan/Profile Retaining Wall Plans Stormwater BMP Grading/Details Plan Cross Sections (50' Intervals and all Driveways) We have assumed that 200 linear feet of wet-cast retaining wall will be required for the construction of the sidewalk/trail. We will provide the City plans at 60% and 95% completion for review and comment. Comments will be addressed in the subsequent submittal. We have assumed submittal to State Aid will occur at approximately the 95% completion level. All State Aid and City comments will be addressed before completion of the final construction plans. B. Detailed Bid Items and Quantities Detailed bid items and quantities will be provided to the City of New Brighton for inclusion in their bidding documents. C. Final Construction Specifications We will prepare technical special provisions for the project. We have assumed that the special provisions will be provided to the City of New Brighton for inclusion in their bidding documents. D. Private Utility Coordination We will utilize the survey of underground utilities to understand the potential private utility conflicts with the project. We will conduct and attend up to two (2) meetings with private utility companies during the design phase to coordinate the proposed improvements. E. Meetings We have assumed that we will prepare for and conduct up to three (3) meetings with City staff through the plan development process of the project. F. Bidding We will work with the City of New Brighton to prepare the project for bidding and respond to any contractor questions during the bidding process. I University - - -238NSt. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley>>>Horn Page 4 Task 4—Stormwater Management and Watershed Coordination A. Rice Creek Watershed District Coordination Kimley-Horn will meet with the Rice Creek Watershed District to review the proposed improvements and understand the stormwater management requirements for the project. After preparation of the final construction plans, we will meet with the watershed district a second time to review the plans in advance of the permit submittal to attempt to streamline the permit process. We will prepare the permit application package for the watershed district and coordinate the submittal and review process. B. Stormwater Management Design Following the initial meeting with the watershed, we will work with City staff to identify potential stormwater treatment locations that may be necessary for the project improvements. We have assumed that stormwater treatment will be required for the construction of the trail along Lake Valentine Road. We have assumed the majority of roadway improvements will fall under the rehabilitation category and the proposed trail will maintain a 5-foot vegetated buffer where a retaining wall is not required. We will prepare a grading plan and construction details for one (1) above ground stormwater BMP (i.e. rain garden) to be constructed as part of the project. We have assumed this will be able to be constructed within existing City or MnDOT right-of-way. If more treatment is required or if a regional approach to the stormwater treatment is adopted, we would complete that work as an additional service. Schedule We will provide our services as expeditiously as practicable with the goal of meeting the following schedule: Begin Work October 6, 2014 Final Plans and Technical Specifications Complete February 2015 Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for Bids March 2015 Bid Opening April/May 2015 Start Construction June 2015 We will coordinate the project schedule with the City of New Brighton. Fee and Expenses KHA will perform the services detailed above on a labor fee plus expense basis. The following is a summary of the estimated costs to complete the scope of services. Task 1 —Data Collection 7,000 Task 2— Project Management/Agency Coordination 4,000 Task 3— Final Construction Plans and Specifications 30,000 Task 4—Stormwater Management and Watershed Coordination 4,000 Expenses 2,800 Total Estimated Fees and Expenses 47,800 Kimley>a>Horn Page 5 KHA will not exceed the total amount shown above without authorization from the Client. Labor fee will be billed according to our current rate schedule. A percentage of labor fee will be added to each invoice to cover certain other expenses such as telecommunications, in-house reproduction, postage, supplies, and local mileage. Payment will be due within 25 days of your receipt of the invoice. Closure In addition to the matters set forth herein, our Agreement shall include and be subject to, and only to, the attached Standard Provisions, which are incorporated by reference. As used in the Standard Provisions, "Consultant" shall refer to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and "Client" shall refer to the City of Arden Hills. If you concur in all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please have authorized persons execute both copies of this Agreement in the spaces provided below, retain one copy, and return the other to us. Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for sixty (60) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services to you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. d n . Horn, P.E. r. Vice President Attachment- Standard Provisions CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Agreed to this day of 2014. Signature Name Title Date MrAMEM Kim ey>>> Horn Page 6 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STANDARD PROVISIONS 1) Consultant's Scope of Services and Additional Services. The Consultant's undertaking to perform professional services extends only to the services specifically described in this Agreement. However, if requested by the Client and agreed to by the Consultant, the Consultant will perform Additional Services, which shall be governed by these provisions. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the Client shall pay the Consultant for any Additional Services an amount based upon the Consultant's then-current hourly rates plus an amount to cover certain direct expenses including telecommunications, in-house reproduction, postage, supplies, project related computer time, and local mileage. 2) Client's Responsibilities. In addition to other responsibilities described herein or imposed by law, the Client shall: a) Designate in writing a person to act as its representative with respect to this Agreement, such person having complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and make or interpret the Client's decisions. b) Provide all information and criteria as to the Client's requirements, objectives, and expectations for the project including all numerical criteria that are to be met and all standards of development, design, or construction. c) Provide to the Consultant all previous studies, plans, or other documents pertaining to the project and all new data reasonably necessary in the Consultant's opinion, such as site survey and engineering data, environmental impact assessments or statements, upon all of which the Consultant may rely. d) Arrange for access to the site and other private or public property as required for the Consultant to provide its services. e) Review all documents or oral reports presented by the Consultant and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the Consultant. f) Furnish approvals and permits from governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project and approvals and consents from other parties as may be necessary for completion of the Consultant's services. g) Cause to be provided such independent accounting, legal, insurance, cost estimating and overall feasibility services as the Client may require. h) Give prompt written notice to the Consultant whenever the Client becomes aware of any development that affects the scope, timing, or payment of the Consultant's services or any defect or noncompliance in any aspect of the project. i) Bear all costs incidental to the responsibilities of the Client. 3) Period of Services. Unless otherwise stated herein, the Consultant will begin work timely after receipt of a properly executed copy of this Agreement and any required retainer amount. This Agreement is made in anticipation of conditions permitting continuous and orderly progress through completion of the services. Times for performance shall be extended as necessary for delays or suspensions due to circumstances that the Consultant does not control. If such delay or suspension extends for more than six months (cumulatively), Consultant's compensation shall be renegotiated. 4) Method of Payment. Compensation shall be paid to the Consultant in accordance with the following provisions: a) Invoices will be submitted periodically for services performed and expenses incurred. Payment of each invoice will be due within 25 days of receipt. The Client shall also pay any applicable sales tax. All retainers will be held by the Consultant for the duration of the project and applied against the final invoice. Interest will be added to accounts not paid within 25 days at the maximum rate allowed by law. If the Client fails to make any payment due to the Consultant under this or any other agreement within 30 days after the Consultant's transmittal of its invoice, the Consultant may, after giving notice to the Client, suspend services and withhold deliverables until all amounts due are paid in full and may commence proceedings, including filing liens, to 2550 University Avenue West, - 2, 38,N, St. Paul MN,55114 Kimley>>>Horn Page 7 secure its right to payment under this Agreement. b) If the Client relies on payment or proceeds from a third party to pay Consultant and Client does not pay Consultant's invoice within 60 days of receipt, Consultant may communicate directly with such third party to secure payment. c) If the Client objects to an invoice, it must advise the Consultant in writing giving its reasons within 14 days of receipt of the invoice or the Client's objections will be waived, and the invoice shall conclusively be deemed due and owing. If the Client objects to only a portion of the invoice, payment for all other portions remains due within 25 days of receipt. d) If the Consultant initiates legal proceedings to collect payment, it may recover, in addition to all amounts due, its reasonable attorneys' fees, reasonable experts' fees, and other expenses related to the proceedings. Such expenses shall include the cost, at the Consultant's normal hourly billing rates, of the time devoted to such proceedings by its employees. e) The Client agrees that the payment to the Consultant is not subject to any contingency or condition. The Consultant may negotiate payment of any check tendered by the Client, even if the words"in full satisfaction" or words intended to have similar effect appear on the check without such negotiation being an accord and satisfaction of any disputed debt and without prejudicing any right of the Consultant to collect additional amounts from the Client. 5) Use of Documents. All documents, including but not limited to drawings, specifications, reports, and data or programs stored electronically, prepared by the Consultant are related exclusively to the services described in this Agreement, and may be used only if the Client has satisfied all of its obligations under this Agreement. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for use, partial use or reuse by the Client or others on extensions of this project or on any other project. Any modifications made by the Client to any of the Consultant's documents, or any use, partial use or reuse of the documents without written authorization or adaptation by the Consultant will be at the Client's sole risk and without liability to the Consultant, and the Client shall indemnify, defend and hold the Consultant harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys'fees, resulting therefrom. The Consultant's electronic files and source code developed in the development of application code remain the property of the Consultant and shall be provided to the Client only if expressly provided for in this Agreement. Any electronic files not containing an electronic seal are provided only for the convenience of the Client, and use of them is at the Client's sole risk. In the case of any defects in the electronic files or any discrepancies between them and the hardcopy of the documents prepared by the Consultant, the hardcopy shall govern. Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified without the Consultant's authorization,the Client has 60 days to perform acceptance tests, after which it shall be deemed to have accepted the data. 6) Opinions of Cost. Because the Consultant does not control the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, methods of determining prices, or competitive bidding or market conditions, any opinions rendered as to costs, including but not limited to opinions as to the costs of construction and materials, shall be made on the basis of its experience and represent its judgment as an experienced and qualified professional, familiar with the industry. The Consultant cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from its opinions of cost. If the Client wishes greater assurance as to the amount of any cost, it shall employ an independent cost estimator. Consultant's services required to bring costs within any limitation established by the Client will be paid for as Additional Services. 7) Termination. The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party, or upon thirty days' written notice for the convenience of the terminating party. If any change occurs in the ownership of the Client, the Consultant shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement. In the event of any termination, the Consultant shall be paid for all services rendered and expenses incurred to the effective date of termination, and other reasonable expenses incurred by the Consultant as a result of such termination. If the Consultant's compensation is a fixed fee, the amount payable for services will be a proportional amount of the total fee based on the ratio of the amount of the services performed, as reasonably determined by the Consultant, to the total amount of services which were to have been performed. kimley-1101M.com 2550 University Avenue West, Kim ey>>>Horn Page 8 8) Insurance. The Consultant carries Workers' Compensation insurance, professional liability insurance, and general liability insurance. If the Client directs the Consultant to obtain increased insurance coverage, the Consultant will take out such additional insurance, if obtainable, at the Client's expense. 9) Standard of Care. The standard of care applicable to Consultant's services will be the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by consultants performing the same or similar services in the same locality at the time the services are provided. No warranty, express or implied, is made or intended by the Consultant's undertaking herein or its performance of services, and it is agreed that the Consultant is not a fiduciary with respect to the Client. 10) LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the Project to the Client and the Consultant, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees, to the fullest extent of the law, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement or the existence of applicable insurance coverage, that the total liability, in the aggregate, of the Consultant and the Consultant's officers, directors, employees, agents, and subconsultants to the Client or to anyone claiming by, through or under the Client, for any and all claims, losses, costs or damages whatsoever arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to the services under this Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to, the negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract or any warranty, express or implied, of the Consultant or the Consultant's officers, directors, employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not exceed twice the total compensation received by the Consultant under this Agreement or$50,000, whichever is greater. Higher limits of liability may be negotiated for additional fee. Under no circumstances shall the Consultant be liable for extra costs or other consequences due to changed conditions, or for costs related to the failure of contractors to perform work in accordance with the plans and specifications. This Section 10 is intended solely to limit the remedies available to the Client or those claiming by or through the Client, and nothing in this Section 10 shall require the Client to indemnify the Consultant. 11) Mutual Waiver of Consequential Damages. In no event shall either party be liable to the other for any consequential, incidental, punitive, or indirect damages including but not limited to loss of income or loss of profits. 12) Certifications. The Consultant shall not be required to execute certifications or third-party reliance letters that are inaccurate, that relate to facts of which the Consultant does not have actual knowledge, or that would cause the Consultant to violate applicable rules of professional responsibility. 13) Dispute Resolution. All claims by the Client arising out of this Agreement or its breach shall be submitted first to mediation in accordance with the Construction Industry Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association as a condition precedent to litigation. Any mediation or civil action by Client must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action asserted but in no event later than allowed by applicable statutes. 14) Hazardous Substances and Conditions. In no event shall Consultant be a custodian, transporter, handler, arranger, contractor, or remediator with respect to hazardous substances and conditions. Consultant's services will be limited to professional analysis, recommendations, and reporting, including, when agreed to, plans and specifications for isolation, removal, or remediation. The Consultant shall notify the Client of hazardous substances or conditions not contemplated in the scope of services of which the Consultant actually becomes aware. Upon such notice by the Consultant, the Consultant may stop affected portions of its services until the hazardous substance or condition is eliminated. 15) Construction Phase Services. a) If the Consultant's services include the preparation of documents to be used for construction and the Consultant is not retained to make periodic site visits, the Client assumes all responsibility for interpretation of the documents and for construction observation, and the Client waives any claims against the Consultant in any way connected thereto. b) If the Consultant provides construction phase services, the Consultant shall have no responsibility for any contractor's means, methods, techniques, equipment choice and usage, sequence, schedule, safety programs, 2550 UniversityAyqnue West, it Kimsey>>>Horn Page 9 or safety practices, nor shall Consultant have any authority or responsibility to stop or direct the work of any contractor.The Consultant's visits will be for the purpose of endeavoring to provide the Client a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of its contractors will generally conform to the construction documents prepared by the Consultant. Consultant neither guarantees the performance of contractors, nor assumes responsibility for any contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. c) The Consultant is not responsible for any duties assigned to the design professional in the construction contract that are not expressly provided for in this Agreement. The Client agrees that each contract with any contractor shall state that the contractor shall be solely responsible for job site safety and for its means and methods; that the contractor shall indemnify the Client and the Consultant for all claims and liability arising out of job site accidents; and that the Client and the Consultant shall be made additional insureds under the contractor's general liability insurance policy. 16) No Third-Party Beneficiaries; Assignment and Subcontracting. This Agreement gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the Client and the Consultant, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole benefit of the Client and the Consultant. The Client shall not assign or transfer any rights under or interest in this Agreement, or any claim arising out of the performance of services by Consultant, without the written consent of the Consultant. The Consultant reserves the right to augment its staff with subconsultants as it deems appropriate due to project logistics, schedules, or market conditions. If the Consultant exercises this right, the Consultant will maintain the agreed-upon billing rates for services identified in the contract, regardless of whether the services are provided by in-house employees, contract employees, or independent subconsultants. 17) Confidentiality. The Client consents to the use and dissemination by the Consultant of photographs of the project and to the use by the Consultant of facts, data and information obtained by the Consultant in the performance of its services. If, however, any facts, data or information are specifically identified in writing by the Client as confidential, the Consultant shall use reasonable care to maintain the confidentiality of that material. 18) Miscellaneous Provisions. This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Minnesota. This Agreement contains the entire and fully integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations, agreements or understandings, whether written or oral. Except as provided in Section 1,this Agreement can be supplemented or amended only by a written document executed by both parties. Provided, however, that any conflicting or additional terms on any purchase order issued by the Client shall be void and are hereby expressly rejected by the Consultant. Any provision in this Agreement that is unenforceable shall be ineffective to the extent of such unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions. The non-enforcement of any provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. University - - e Page 1 of 2 DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lexington Avenue Improvements Requested Action Approve Ramsey County Cooperative Agreement PUBW2014-03R for the Lexington Avenue/County Road F Improvement planned to be undertaken by Ramsey County in 2015. Background/Discussion The I-694 MnDOT project a few years ago closed the I-694 access to and from Snelling Avenue, which put more pressure on the freeway access provided by Lexington Avenue. In response to this, Ramsey County has been working on a project to improve the flow of Lexington Avenue from just south of I-694 to north of County Road F; including intersection improvements at County Road F. The project generally includes: left turn lanes from County Road F on to Lexington Avenue; dual left turn lanes from Lexington Avenue on to County Road F; medians on Lexington Avenue between I-694 and County Road F (these turn lanes will allow all existing movements except left turns out of Gramsie Road to southbound Lexington Avenue); Rice Creek Watershed required storm water treatment; and finally, a concrete overlay of Lexington Avenue. Attached is the Cooperative Agreement from Ramsey County for the project. The City’s contribution to this project is approximately $250,000; land acquisition is estimated at about $185,000 and construction is estimated at about $63,000. The City costs are all in accordance with the Ramsey County Cost Participation Policy. All of the City costs should be MSA fundable. The County has also agreed not to invoice the City for any costs until March 15, 2016. NEW BUSINESS – 8C MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Staff believes that this project is needed and will benefit Arden Hills residents and businesses. Staff would recommend approval of Cooperative Agreement PUBW2014-03R for the Lexington Avenue Improvements. Attachment Attachment A: Ramsey County Cooperative Agreement PUBW2014-03R PW 2014-21 Page 1 of 6 Agreement PUBW2014-03R RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ARDEN HILLS FOR Lexington Avenue and County Road F Reconstruction S.A.P. 062-651-048, S.A.P. 062-612-024, S.A.P. 187-020-015 S.A.P. 062-651-047(ROW), S.A.P. 062-612-023(ROW) S.P. 6285-154 This Agreement is between the City of Arden Hills, a municipal corporation ("City") and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, ("County") for the reconstruction and overlay of the Lexington Avenue and County Road F Reconstruction and overlay (“Project”); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to reconstruct and overlay Lexington Avenue from Red Fox Road to Cummings Park Drive and County Road F from Innovation Way to Oxford Street; and WHEREAS, Lexington Avenue and County Road F, in the area affected by reconstruction, is designated County State Aid Highway 51 and County Road F is designated County State Aid Highway 12, and both are in the City; and WHEREAS, preliminary studies and reports conducted by the City and County indicate that it is feasible to reconstruct and overlay in the Project limits; and WHEREAS, the County has prepared the necessary designs, plans, specifications, estimates, proposals, and approvals in accordance with funding requirements to take bids for the Project and will incorporate agreed-upon city-prepared items into the plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, the Project is designated as eligible for funds from State Project Funds 6285-154, Ramsey County State Aid Highway (CSAH) S.A.P. 062-651-048, S.A.P. 062-612-024, S.A.P. 187-020-015 S.A.P. 062-651-047 (ROW), and S.A.P. 062-612-023 (ROW); and WHEREAS, construction of storm sewer systems(s) and storm water treatment/infiltration basin will be done as part of this Project in accordance with local watershed rules; and WHEREAS, plans for the Project showing proposed intersection reconstruction, alignment, profiles, grades, and cross-sections for the Project as State funds Assisted and County State Aid Highway, have been presented to the City and are on file at Ramsey County Public Works Department; and PW 2014-21 Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the grading and widening provisions require acquisition of certain right-of-way and temporary construction and slope easements prior to construction and as designed in the approved right-of-way plan for the Project; and WHEREAS, the County is utilizing the consultant staff of Ulteig Engineering, Surveying, and Consulting Services in acquiring necessary easements and right-of-way, and McKinzie Metro Appraisal is performing property appraisals, as determined by the construction project grading limits, under a separate right-of-way project, S.A.P. 062-651-047, and S.P. 062-612-023. All right-of-way costs are County State Aid Highway and Municipal State Aid reimbursable costs; and WHEREAS, a preliminary estimate of Project costs has been prepared. The City Cost Estimate is Exhibit A and the Cost Participation Policy is Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the County will take bids for the Project, prepare an abstract of bids and cost participation summary, request the City's concurrence to award a contract, award a contract and pay the contractor from State Funds, County State Aid Highway, Municipal State Aid Highway, and local funds identified for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The recitals set forth in this Agreement are hereby made a part of this Agreement as set out in full. 2. The County will prepare all plans, specifications, estimates, and proposals for the Project, will include, among other things, the proposed reconstruction, alignment, profiles, grades, cross sections, impacts, and costs for the improvements including paving, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, concrete sidewalk, bituminous path, boulevard, utility replacement and adjustments. Any costs associated with Project revisions after the completion of plans and specifications will be paid for by the party requesting the revisions. Revisions must be consistent with State Aid requirements and are subject to approval by the County. 3. Prior to County award of a contract, the County shall first receive concurrence from the City for award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. 4. The County and City shall participate in the costs of construction in accordance with the Cost Participation Policy, attached as Exhibit B. If there is a conflict between Exhibit B and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail. 5. Upon award of a construction contract the County shall perform or contract the performance of the construction administration for all elements of the Project. 6. The County will be the lead agency for the acquisition of the Permanent Highway Easements and Temporary Construction Easements (hereinafter “Easement(s)”) required PW 2014-21 Page 3 of 6 for the Project in accordance with the Right-of-Way plan approved by the parties and MnDOT. The temporary and permanent easements for each property are attached as Exhibit C. 7. The City grants the County Temporary Construction Easements over all City owned Rights-of-Way and property within the limits of the Project for use during construction. Any and all billing and fees associated with the project initiated by the City shall be resolved by the City, at no cost to the County. 8. Any Easement that cannot be negotiated will be acquired through eminent domain proceedings. The County will utilize Ramsey County Attorney’s Office, or outside counsel in its sole discretion. 9. The City and County shall each pay 50% of all costs of acquisition of all properties and easements including but not limited to: all court ordered acquisition costs, even if those costs exceed estimates; parcel appraisal costs; acquisition consultants’ fees; relocation costs; site grading, and turf establishment costs; services of the County Attorney’s Office or outside counsel; and any required fees. An invoice from the County to the City for right of way costs will occur after March 15, 2016. 10. At the request of the City, the County will provide periodic updates of the costs of acquisition of Easements, including costs for parcels that have been successfully negotiated and any remaining parcels to be settled. 11. The City shall pay the County a 12% fee for design services and a 12% fee for construction administration of the Project. Design service fees shall be paid before the application of State Funds. Construction administration fees shall be paid at the completion of the Project. The City will pay to the County a 2% fee for construction administration services for betterments requested by the City after the bids are opened the betterments will be designed and inspected by the City, which will be calculated before the application of Federal Funds, if applicable. 12. After the application of State Funds, the costs of storm sewer construction needed for Project drainage (catch basins and leads) will be split in accordance with the drainage area, Exhibit D, incorporated herein by reference. 13. Upon completion of the Project, the County shall own the storm sewer catch basins and leads on County roads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines within the City. Exhibit E attached, references ownership responsibility of the storm water manholes, catch basins, and piping system. 14. All construction costs related to new water mains, water services, and hydrants shall be paid for by the City. PW 2014-21 Page 4 of 6 15. The costs of contractor mobilization, field office operation, erosion control supervisor, and traffic control will be allocated based upon cost participation percentages for the entire Project, which will be determined when Bids are received. No adjustments in this allocation will be made after Bids are taken. 16. After the application of State Funds the City shall pay 100% of the cost of construction of any betterments requested by the City after bids are opened. 17. Quantity distributions and costs in Exhibit A are estimates. Actual costs shall be based on the contractor's unit prices and the quantities constructed. 18. The County will invoice the City for costs incurred for easement acquisition after March 15, 2016. This invoice will include all fees and costs to date. Unsettled parcels after this date will be billed on an as needed basis. Payment will be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. 19. The City and County shall indemnify, defend, and hold each other harmless against any and all liability, losses, costs, damages, expenses, claims, or actions, including attorney’s fees, which the indemnified party, its officials, agents, or employees may hereafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the indemnifying party, its officials, agents, or employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform the indemnifying party’s obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by the County or the City of any statutory or common law immunities, limits, or exceptions on liability. 20. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by mutual agreement of the parties. PW 2014-21 Page 5 of 6 CITY OF SHOREVIEW, MINNESOTA By: _______________________________ Date:_______________________ Mayor By: _______________________________ Date:_______________________ Terry Maurer Director of Public Works Approved by the Office of Financial Services: By: _______________________________ Approved as to Form: By: _______________________________ City Attorney PW 2014-21 Page 6 of 6 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Julie Kleinschmidt, County Manager Date: _______________________________ Approval recommended: James E. Tolaas, Director Public Works Department Approved as to form: Assistant County Attorney NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 1 of 9 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #14-030 Applicant: CoBeck Construction Property Location: 4105 Lexington Avenue North (Gradient Financial) Request: Site Plan Review – Parking Lot Requested Action Motion to approve Planning Case 14-030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the seven (7) conditions in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council. Background Gradient Financial owns the property located at 4105 Lexington Avenue, which is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. The property is generally positioned north of County Road F, south of Boston Scientific, east of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue. The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property to allow for the rearrangement of parking areas, relocation of the access along County Road F West, closure of the access along Lexington Avenue North and other internal modifications that will maximize efficiency of the parking and driving areas on the site. NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 2 of 9 Overview of Request The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property in order to provide better accessibility to the front entrance of the Gradient Financial building and to plan for Ramsey County’s future reconstruction of the Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West intersection. The improvements to this intersection will result in the loss of parking spaces and the vehicle access along the eastern side of the property. The County’s project in this area is projected to begin during the 2015 construction season. As indicated by the applicant a two phased approach would be used in order to complete the proposed project. In the fall of 2014, during Phase 1, the western half of the parking lot would be reconstructed. Construction of Phase 2 is proposed to be completed in 2015, and will include the remaining eastern half of the parking lot. In Phase 1 of construction a new access off of County Road F West would be constructed slightly to the west of the existing access in order to align the new access with the new driveway section being constructed up to the front entrance of the building. The proposed design is intended to better facilitate traffic movements within the site and to orient drivers towards the front of the building. As part of the new driveway design, a one-way traffic circle is being proposed to move drivers more efficiently towards the front entrance before transitioning to a parking space within the parking lot or to the front drop-off location. During Phase 1 new parking spaces would be created along the southwestern edge of the parking lot to make up for the spaces lost during the construction of the new entrance off of County Road F West and closure of the access in Phase 2 along Lexington Avenue North. The modifications being made to the parking lot in Phase 1 are being completed in order to accommodate the roadway expansion project proposed by Ramsey County at the intersection of Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. During Phase 2 of construction the secondary driveway along Lexington Avenue North would be permanently closed so that a right turn lane onto County Road F West can be constructed. The roadway expansion project would result in the removal of additional parking spaces along the eastern side of the property. The removal of these parking spaces is critical to the plans as this additional space is needed for the new turn lane and landscaping buffer along Lexington Avenue North. Phase 2 includes new parking spaces along the north property line and around the rain garden that is proposed to be constructed within the old driving lane that provided access out to Lexington Avenue North. The applicant has submitted a narrative of the proposed project (Attachment C), an existing site layout, phased plan and master plan (Attachment D), tree preservation and landscaping plan (Attachment E), parking plan (Attachment F), and a photometric plan (Attachment G). NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 3 of 9 Plan Evaluation 1. I-1 Limited Industrial District Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment A. Site Plan Review – Site Plan Approval Required A Site Plan Review is required by the City Code for the reorganization of parking areas, drives and entrances within any industrial district. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property in order to provide better access to the front entrance of their building and to plan for the future reconstruction of the Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West intersection that will result in the loss of parking spaces and access along the eastern side of the property. B. Lot Coverage – Meets Requirements The existing and proposed lot coverage calculations do not exceed the standards set within the I-1 Light Industrial Zoning District. The I-1 Zoning District permits maximum lot coverage of 65% for impervious surfaces and a minimum landscape coverage of 35%. Proposed coverage after completion of Phase 1: Lot coverage = 62.3% Landscape coverage = 37.7% Proposed coverage after completion of Phase 2: Lot coverage = 58.4% Landscape coverage = 41.6% Type/Total Existing Conditions Today Proposed Phase 1 Completed Proposed Phase 2 Completed Square Feet % Square Feet % Square Feet % Principle Building 24,006 10.62% 24,006 10.62% 24,006 10.97% Accessory Structure 1,800 .80% 1,800 .80% 1,800 .82% Impervious - Concrete 2,984 1.32% 3,649 1.61% 3,649 1.67% Patios 1,384 .61% 1,384 .61% 1,384 .63% Parking Lot 107,351 47.48% 110,091 48.70% 96,944 44.30% Total Coverage 137,525 60.8% 140,930 62.3% 127,783 58.4% Landscape Coverage 88,573 39.2% 85,168 37.7% 91,070 41.6% Lot Size 226,098 226,098 218,853 Parking Lot Size 102,794 102,794 102,794 NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 4 of 9 C. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan – Meets Requirements The proposed construction would impact twenty (20) trees on the property that total 298 caliper inches. The tree inventory indicates that the lot has a total of 656 significant caliper inches. Based on the calculations from the tree inventory more than the permitted 10% of the significant caliper inches will be removed with this project. When more than 10% are removed the applicant is required to meet the City’s tree preservation standards, and mitigation in this case is required. The property owner is required to replace 117 caliper inches and the plan indicates that 124 caliper inches will be planted on the site. The tree preservation and landscaping plan that has been submitted by the applicant can be found in Attachment E. D. Lighting – Approval required by City and Ramsey County Sheriff. Modifications to the existing exterior lighting on the site are being proposed for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the parking lot reconfiguration. The Photometric Plan that has been provided in Attachment G has been reviewed by the Ramsey County Sheriff. Comments from this review have been provided to the applicant to assist them in developing a revised plan that will meet the standards of both the City and the County. Parking Stall Count 277 278 (2 POP) =280 267 (5 POP)=272 Parking Lot Island Area 7,586 7.38% 7,573 7.37% 10,451 10.20% Caliper Inches Total Existing Significant Trees 656 Proposed Removal – Phases 1 86 Proposed Removal – Phases 2 212 Replacement Trees Required* 117 Replacement Trees Proposed 124 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. Replacement trees for unapproved removal are calculated at two caliper inches for every one caliper inch removed. NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 5 of 9 As a condition of approval, the lighting and security plan will need to be approved by the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department prior to the issuance of any grading permit. The new Photometric Plan will be required to meet the standards set within Section 1325.50 Subd. 3 of the City’s Zoning Code. E. Parking The current parking lot contains 276 total parking spaces. During Phase 1 two (2) parking spaces would be added as a result of the reconfiguration. By the end of Phase 2, as a result of the removal of the driving lane and curb cut that provide access to Lexington Avenue, nine (9) parking spaces would be eliminated from the existing parking count of 276. This would result in a total of 267 parking spaces with five (5) proof-of-parking spaces that could be constructed. With proof-of-parking included the completed project would have 272 parking spaces available. The Parking and Traffic Island Plan has been provided in Attachment F. The applicant has indicated that they have been monitoring their parking needs and have concluded that 267 parking spaces are more than adequate for their use of the property. However, if additional spaces are required the property owner would be obligated to construct the proof-of-parking spaces and any other additional spaces required by the Code. In Section 1325.06 of Zoning Code it states that Business and Professional Offices are required to provide one (1) parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. Based on this criteria two-hundred and eighty-eight (288) parking spaces are required by the Code. However, if the common spaces such as lobbies, public corridors, restrooms and large meeting rooms are subtracted from the overall square footage of the building two-hundred and twenty-seven (227) parking spaces would be required. Type/Total Required by City Code Existing Conditions Today Proposed Phase 1 Completed Proposed Phase 2 Completed Building Size (1 per 250 Square Feet) 72,018 - - - Parking Stall Count 288 276 278 267 Proof of Parking - - 2 5 Total W/Proof of Parking - - 280 272 NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 6 of 9 2. Additional Review a. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) reviewed the plans for this request and determined that a RCWD Permit would not be required for the proposed project. RCWD is, however, requiring that the construction limits be staked so they can verify that no wetlands are being impacted during the project. b. Ramsey County has reviewed the improvement plans and has provided comments that can viewed in Attachment E. At this time, the County has not noted any significant conflicts or areas of concern with the proposed plan. c. The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. d. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and stated that a Grading and Erosion Control Permit is needed for this project. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-030 at their regular meeting on October 8, 2014. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment A. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: General Findings: 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. The lot is 226,098 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 640 feet in width, and 350 feet in depth. 3. The property currently consists of a principal building 24,006 square feet in size and an accessory structure 1,800 square feet in size. 4. Ramsey County is proposing traffic improvements along Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 5. The property currently has access off of both Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 6. In Phase 1 of construction the access off of County Road F West and the driveway that provides access to the front of the building will be moved slightly to the west of its current location. 7. In phase 2 of construction the access off of Lexington Avenue North will be closed. 8. That the construction of Phase 1 is planned for the fall of 2014, and the construction of Phase 2 is planned to commence once the County finalizes their plans and/or begins the roadway improvement to Lexington Avenue and County Road F West. 9. The Zoning Code requires 288 parking spaces for this use. 10. The parking lot currently contains 276 parking spaces. NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 7 of 9 11. After completion of Phase 2 the parking lot will contain 267 parking spaces with 5 additional proof-of-parking spaces for a total of 272 parking spaces. 12. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. Recommendation The findings of fact for the Site Plan Review support a recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-030 and unanimously recommends approval (5-0) of the Site Plan Review for the property located at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following seven (7) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the exact location of the new access along County Road F shall be approved by Ramsey County and the RCWD. That all curb cuts along the County Road shall be a minimum width of twenty-six (26) feet or a maximum width of thirty-two (32) feet. 3. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 4. That the final tree and landscaping plan shall be approved by the City before the issuance of the grading permit to ensure that the plan meets the landscaping regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 5. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 6. That a lighting and security plan shall be submitted and approved by the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff. At a minimum it shall meet the requirements stated in Section 1325.50 Subd. 3 of the City’s Zoning Code. 7. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 8 of 9 Requested Action Motion to approve Planning Case 14-030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the seven (7) conditions in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council. Options 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Approve the proposal with conditions (Recommended Action). 3. Deny the application with reasons for denial. 4. Table for additional information. Notice Although a Site Plan Review does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 2, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by November 1, 2014 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The City may extend the review period beyond the 120 days, with the applicant’s permission. Attachments A. Draft Planning Commission Minutes – October 8, 2014 B. Planning Commission Report – October 8, 2014 NEW BUSINESS – 8B City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 9 of 9 C. Application and Narrative D. Site Plan – Existing, Phase 1/Phase 2 and Master Plan E. Tree Preservation and Landscaping F. Parking and Traffic Island Plan G. Photometric Plan H. Ramsey County Comments and Intersection Plan (Lexington/County Road F) I. Aerial Site Map Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2014 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Vice Chair Roberta Thompson called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Vice Chair Roberta Thompson, Commissioners Angela Hames, Andrew Holewa, Steven Jones, and Clayton Zimmerman. Absent: Chair Clayton Larson and Commissioner Brent Bartel. Also present were: Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – OCTOBER 8, 2014 Vice Chair Thompson stated the agenda will stand as published. PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 14-030; Site Plan Review; 4105 Lexington Avenue North – Not a Public Hearing City Planner Streff explained that the applicant has requested a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property to allow for the rearrangement of parking areas, relocation of the access along County Road F West, closure of the access along Lexington Avenue North and other internal modifications that will maximize efficiency of the parking and driving areas at 4105 Lexington Avenue North. City Planner Streff stated that Gradient Financial owns the property located at 4105 Lexington Avenue, which is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. The property is generally positioned north of County Road F, south of Boston Scientific, east of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 8, 2014 2 City Planner Streff reported that the applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property in order to provide better accessibility to the front entrance of the Gradient Financial building and to plan for Ramsey County’s future reconstruction of the Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West intersection. The improvements to this intersection will result in the loss of parking spaces and the vehicle access along the eastern side of the property. The County’s project in this area is projected to begin during the 2015 construction season. As indicated by the applicant a two-phased approach would be used in order to complete the proposed project. In the fall of 2014, during Phase 1, the western half of the parking lot would be reconstructed. Construction of Phase 2 is proposed to be completed in 2015, and will include the remaining eastern half of the parking lot. City Planner Streff indicated that in Phase 1 of construction a new access off of County Road F West would be constructed slightly to the west of the existing access in order to align the new access with the new driveway section being constructed up to the front entrance of the building. The proposed design is intended to better facilitate traffic movements within the site and to orient drivers towards the front of the building. As part of the new driveway design, a one-way traffic circle is being proposed to move drivers more efficiently towards the front entrance before transitioning to a parking space within the parking lot or to the front drop-off location. During Phase 1 new parking spaces would be created along the southwestern edge of the parking lot to make up for the spaces lost during the construction of the new entrance off of County Road F West and closure of the access in Phase 2 along Lexington Avenue North. The modifications being made to the parking lot in Phase 1 are being completed in order to accommodate the roadway expansion project proposed by Ramsey County at the intersection of Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. City Planner Streff explained that during Phase 2 of construction the secondary driveway along Lexington Avenue North would be permanently closed so that a right turn lane onto County Road F West can be constructed. The roadway expansion project would result in the removal of additional parking spaces along the eastern side of the property. The removal of these parking spaces is critical to the plans as this additional space is needed for the new turn lane and landscaping buffer along Lexington Avenue North. Phase 2 includes new parking spaces along the north property line and around the rain garden that is proposed to be constructed within the old driving lane that provided access out to Lexington Avenue North. Land Use Plan: Site Data I/O - Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Office Zoning: I-1 – Limited Industrial District Current Lot Sizes: 5.17 Acres Topography: Fairly Flat City Planner Streff reviewed the surrounding area and the Plan Evaluation. He provided the following Findings of Fact for review: General Findings 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. The lot is 226,098 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 640 feet in width, and 350 feet in depth. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 8, 2014 3 3. The property currently consists of a principal building 24,006 square feet in size and an accessory structure 1,800 square feet in size. 4. Ramsey County is proposing traffic improvements along Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 5. The property currently has access off of both Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 6. In Phase 1 of construction the access off of County Road F West and the driveway that provides access to the front of the building will be moved slightly to the west of its current location. 7. In phase 2 of construction the access off of Lexington Avenue North will be closed. 8. That the construction of Phase 1 is planned for the fall of 2014, and the construction of Phase 2 is planned to commence once the County finalizes their plans and/or begins the roadway improvement to Lexington Avenue and County Road F West. 9. The Zoning Code requires 97 parking spaces be provide on this property for this use. 10. The parking lot currently contains 277 parking spaces. 11. After completion of Phase 2 the parking lot will contain 264 parking spaces. 12. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. City Planner Streff stated the findings of fact for the Site Plan Review support a recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review, staff recommends the following seven (7) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the exact location of the new access along County Road F shall be approved by Ramsey County and the RCWD. That all curb cuts along the County Road shall be a minimum width of twenty-six (26) feet or a maximum width of thirty-two (32) feet. 3. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 4. That the final tree and landscaping plan shall be approved by the City before the issuance of the grading permit to ensure that the plan meets the landscaping regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 5. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 6. That a lighting and security plan shall be submitted and approved by the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff. At a minimum it shall meet the requirements stated in Section 1325.50 Subd. 3 of the City’s Zoning Code. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 8, 2014 4 7. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Vice Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Holewa questioned how many parking spaces were required by City Code. City Planner Streff explained that 288 parking spaces were required by Code and the applicant was requesting 264 spaces. He reviewed the site plan in further detail with the Commission. It was noted the site currently had 277 parking spaces. Commissioner Hames inquired how full the current parking lot was for this business. Nate Cote, Gradient Financial representative, explained that Gradient Financial has reviewed the parking requirements and believe that all parking needs would be met. He indicated the site has not encountered any parking concerns to date. Commissioner Jones asked how much shared/open building space the Gradient building had. City Planner Streff estimated this to be approximately 9,600 square feet. Commissioner Holewa requested further information on the work that would be completed on Lexington Avenue. Joe Lux, Ramsey County Senior Planner, reviewed the plans the County had for Lexington Avenue noting turn lanes would be added. He commented the entire surface would be redone with reinforced concrete. The project would begin next spring and should take three months to complete. He discussed how the project would be phased. Commissioner Hames moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 14-030 for Site Plan Review at 4105 Lexington Avenue North based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the seven (7) conditions in the October 8, 2014, report to the Planning Commission. Vice Chair Thompson appreciated the detailed landscaping plan and the fact that the applicant was working with the County on their plans. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 1 of 9 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 8, 2014 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #14-030 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: CoBeck Construction Property Location: 4105 Lexington Avenue North (Gradient Financial) Request: Site Plan Review – Parking Lot Requested Action The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property to allow for the rearrangement of parking areas, relocation of the access along County Road F West, closure of the access along Lexington Avenue North and other internal modifications that will maximize efficiency of the parking and driving areas at 4105 Lexington Avenue North. Background/Overview of Request Gradient Financial owns the property located at 4105 Lexington Avenue, which is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. The property is generally positioned north of County Road F, south of Boston Scientific, east of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property in order to provide better accessibility to the front entrance of the Gradient Financial building and to plan for Ramsey County’s future reconstruction of the Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West intersection. The improvements to this intersection will result in the loss of parking spaces and the vehicle access along the eastern side of the property. The County’s project in this area is projected to begin during the 2015 construction season. As indicated by the applicant a two phased approach would be used in order to complete the proposed project. In the fall of 2014, during Phase 1, the western half of the parking lot would be reconstructed. Construction of City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 2 of 9 Phase 2 is proposed to be completed in 2015, and will include the remaining eastern half of the parking lot. In Phase 1 of construction a new access off of County Road F West would be constructed slightly to the west of the existing access in order to align the new access with the new driveway section being constructed up to the front entrance of the building. The proposed design is intended to better facilitate traffic movements within the site and to orient drivers towards the front of the building. As part of the new driveway design, a one-way traffic circle is being proposed to move drivers more efficiently towards the front entrance before transitioning to a parking space within the parking lot or to the front drop-off location. During Phase 1 new parking spaces would be created along the southwestern edge of the parking lot to make up for the spaces lost during the construction of the new entrance off of County Road F West and closure of the access in Phase 2 along Lexington Avenue North. The modifications being made to the parking lot in Phase 1 are being completed in order to accommodate the roadway expansion project proposed by Ramsey County at the intersection of Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. During Phase 2 of construction the secondary driveway along Lexington Avenue North would be permanently closed so that a right turn lane onto County Road F West can be constructed. The roadway expansion project would result in the removal of additional parking spaces along the eastern side of the property. The removal of these parking spaces is critical to the plans as this additional space is needed for the new turn lane and landscaping buffer along Lexington Avenue North. Phase 2 includes new parking spaces along the north property line and around the rain garden that is proposed to be constructed within the old driving lane that provided access out to Lexington Avenue North. The applicant has submitted a narrative of the proposed project (Attachment A), an existing layout of the site (Attachment B), a site plan depicting the phased construction (Attachment C), and a master site plan of the property (Attachment D). 1. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: I/O - Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Office Zoning: I-1 – Limited Industrial District Current Lot Sizes: 5.17 Acres Topography: Fairly Flat City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 3 of 9 2. Surrounding Area Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Light Industrial/Office South I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Light Industrial/Office/Commercial East (Shoreview) City of Shoreview Residential (8-20 units/acre) City of Shoreview R3 – Multi-Dwelling Residential City of Shoreview Multi-Family Residential West I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Light Industrial/Office Plan Evaluation 1. I-1 Limited Industrial District Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment A. Lot Size & Dimensions – Meets Requirements The lot is 225,205 square feet, with approximate dimensions of 350 feet by 640 feet. B. Site Plan Review – Site Plan Approval Required A Site Plan Review is required by the City Code for the reorganization of parking, drives and entrances within any industrial district. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the property in order to provide better access to the front entrance of their building and to plan for the future reconstruction of the Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West intersection that will result in the loss of parking spaces and access along the eastern side of the property. Applicable I-1 Lot Requirements 1. Minimum Lot Area (sf.) 30,000 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft., width/depth) 100/130 3. Height (ft.) 35 4. Lot Covered by Structure 30% 5. Minimum Landscape Lot Area 35% 6. Minimum Building Setbacks (ft) Front Yard 55 Rear Yard (Principle) 20 Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 Side Yard Interior - Principal (Minimum/total both yards on lot) 20/40 Side Yard Interior - Accessory 10 Side Yard Corner 50 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 4 of 9 C. Lot Coverage – Meets Requirements The existing and proposed lot coverage calculations do not exceed the standards set within the I-1 Light Industrial Zoning District. The I-1 Zoning District permits maximum lot coverage of 65% for impervious surfaces and a minimum landscape coverage of 35%. Proposed coverage after completion of Phase 1: Lot coverage = 62.3% Landscape coverage = 37.7% Proposed coverage after completion of Phase 2: Lot coverage = 58.4% Landscape coverage = 41.6% D. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan The final tree preservation and landscaping plan will require approval by the City before the issuance of the grading permit to ensure that the plan meets the landscaping regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. The tree preservation/landscaping plan that has been submitted by the applicant can be found in Attachment D. Type/Total Existing Conditions Today Proposed Phase 1 Completed Proposed Phase 2 Completed Square Feet % Square Feet % Square Feet % Principle Building 24,006 10.62% 24,006 10.62% 24,006 10.97% Accessory Structure 1,800 .80% 1,800 .80% 1,800 .82% Impervious - Concrete 2,984 1.32% 3,649 1.61% 3,649 1.67% Patios 1,384 .61% 1,384 .61% 1,384 .63% Parking Lot 107,351 47.48% 110,091 48.70% 96,944 44.30% Total Coverage 137,525 60.8% 140,930 62.3% 127,783 58.4% Landscape Coverage 88,573 39.2% 85,168 37.7% 91,070 41.6% Lot Size 226,098 226,098 218,853 Parking Stall Count 277 275 264 Parking Lot Island Area 5,607 5.22% 5,877 5.34% 8,107 8.36% City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 5 of 9 E. Lighting Modifications to the existing exterior lighting plan are being designed for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. As a condition of approval, the lighting and security plan will need to be approved by the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department prior to the issuance of any grading permit. The new lighting plan will at a minimum be required to meet the following standards within Section 1325.50 Subd. 3 of the City’s Zoning Code. Direction: In all districts lighting shall be so arranged as to direct light away from adjoining lots and public streets. Direct or sky-reflected glare, from floodlights or high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, shall not be directed at any adjoining lots or public streets. Concealment or Hooding of Source: The source of illuminate shall be hooded, concealed or controlled in a manner so as to direct the lighting pattern only on the site to which the lighting is intended. Intensity: Any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential property. Exterior Lighting of Building Façade: For non-residential uses, visible from residentially zoned property, a maximum of twenty-five (25) percent of the facade visible from such residential property may be illuminated by direct lighting from spot lights or flood lights. F. Parking – Meets Requirements In Section 1325.06 of Zoning Code it states that Business and Professional Offices are required to provide one (1) parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. Based on this criteria ninety-seven (97) parking spaces are required by the Code. The current parking lot contains 277 total parking spaces. During Phase 1 three (3) parking spaces will be removed as a result of the reconfiguration and by the end of Phase 2 an addition nine (9) spaces will be eliminated resulting in a total of 264 parking spaces when the project is complete. Type/Total Existing Conditions Today Proposed Phase 1 Completed Proposed Phase 2 Completed Building Size 24,006 24,006 24,006 Parking Stall Count 277 275 264 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 6 of 9 2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements The project as proposed is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. 3. Additional Review a. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) reviewed the plans for this request and determined that a RCWD Permit would not be required for the proposed project. RCWD is, however, requiring that the construction limits be staked so they can verify that no wetlands are being impacted during the project. b. Ramsey County has reviewed the improvement plans and has provided comments that can viewed in Attachment E. At this time, the County has not noted any significant conflicts or areas of concern with the proposed plan. c. The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. d. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and stated that a Grading and Erosion Control Permit is needed for this project. Findings of Fact Staff offers the following twelve (12) findings of fact for review: General Findings 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. The lot is 226,098 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 640 feet in width, and 350 feet in depth. 3. The property currently consists of a principal building 24,006 square feet in size and an accessory structure 1,800 square feet in size. 4. Ramsey County is proposing traffic improvements along Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 5. The property currently has access off of both Lexington Avenue North and County Road F West. 6. In Phase 1 of construction the access off of County Road F West and the driveway that provides access to the front of the building will be moved slightly to the west of its current location. 7. In phase 2 of construction the access off of Lexington Avenue North will be closed. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 7 of 9 8. That the construction of Phase 1 is planned for the fall of 2014, and the construction of Phase 2 is planned to commence once the County finalizes their plans and/or begins the roadway improvement to Lexington Avenue and County Road F West. 9. The Zoning Code requires 97 parking spaces be provide on this property for this use. 10. The parking lot currently contains 277 parking spaces. 11. After completion of Phase 2 the parking lot will contain 264 parking spaces. 12. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. Recommendation The findings of fact for the Site Plan Review support a recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review, staff recommends the following seven (7) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the exact location of the new access along County Road F shall be approved by Ramsey County and the RCWD. That all curb cuts along the County Road shall be a minimum width of twenty-six (26) feet or a maximum width of thirty-two (32) feet. 3. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 4. That the final tree and landscaping plan shall be approved by the City before the issuance of the grading permit to ensure that the plan meets the landscaping regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 5. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 6. That a lighting and security plan shall be submitted and approved by the Cit y and the Ramsey County Sheriff. At a minimum it shall meet the requirements stated in Section 1325.50 Subd. 3 of the City’s Zoning Code. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 8 of 9 7. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. Options 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 14-030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the seven (7) conditions in the October 8, 2014, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 14- 030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 8, 2014, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 14-030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North, based on the following findings of fact… 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 14-030 for a Site Plan Review to reconfigure the existing parking lot at 4105 Lexington Avenue North: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Although a Site Plan Review does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 2, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by November 1, 2014 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 - City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 8, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 - Site Plan Review – Gradient Financial\Memos_Reports_14-025 Page 9 of 9 day review period. The City may extend the review period beyond the 120 days, with the applicant’s permission. Attachments A. Application and Narrative B. Site Plan – Existing C. Site Plan – Proposed Phase 1 & Phase 2 D. Site Plan – Master Plan E. Ramsey County Comments and Intersection Plan (Lexington/County Road F) F. Aerial Site Map CoBeck Construction Company, LLC 218 13th Avenue South, Suite 300 South St. Paul, MN 55075 651 756.7521 September 3rd, 2014 Revised September 26th 2014 Mr. Ryan Streff City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Gradient Financial, Arden Hills, MN – Exterior Improvements Dear Mr. Streff I am submitting a site plan review on proposed exterior renovations to 4105 Lexington Ave N complex. The purpose of this is to allow for additional parking and site modifications necessary to the overall flow and modifications proposed by the county to Lexington Ave and County Road F. The modifications are indicated in the following numbers and on the attached site plans. The modifications in Phase 1 would include relocation of the main entrance and lot modifications for additional parking areas. Relocation of the entrance by the county would better serve Gradient Center and the adjacent properties alleviating conflicts for entry on to County F form the adjoining properties. Relocation would also better serve flow and appearances for the Gradient Center providing a more cohesive site plan. Modifications in Phase 1 would include modifications to the lot to accommodate the relocation of the south entrance and additional parking areas required to minimize stall losses due to county changes in Phase 2. The modifications in Phase 2 on the site plan would include corrections along Lexington Ave to add a right turn lane and eliminate the east entrance to the property. This is being driven by the county to reduce traffic conflicts and concerns about the safety of the east entrance onto Lexington Ave. Modifications to the lot would be to minimize parking losses due to easement changes and provide a more cohesive site plan. The following numbers are based on the proposed plan including the circular drive, the expanded drive entrance to the west, the new garage, and all new curb and bituminous. Existing Proposed Phase 1 Proposed Phase 2 Completed Completed Total site area 226,098 sf 226,098 sf 218,853 sf Existing office building 24,006 sf 24,006 sf 24,006 sf Existing garage 1,800 sf 1,800 sf 1,800 sf Impervious – concrete 2984 sf 3649 sf 3649 sf Impervious – patio 1,384 sf 1,384 sf 1,384 sf Impervious – parking 107,351 sf 110,091 sf 96,944sf Total impervious area 137,525 sf 138,852 sf 127,783 sf Page 2 of 2 CoBeck Construction Company, LLC 218 13th Avenue South, Suite 300 South St. Paul, MN 55075 651.756.7521 60.8 % 61.4 % 58.4% Existing Proposed Phase 1 Proposed Phase 2 Completed Completed Total pervious area 88,573 sf 87,246 sf 91,070 sf 39.2 % 38.6 % 41.6% Parking Island Area 5607 sf 5877 sf 8107 sf (Included Above) Parking stalls – regular 270 268 257 Parking stalls – HC 7 7 7 We hope that this request be considered allowing the functionality required and to improve the overall appearance of the premises. Regards, COBECK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC Nate Cote │Vice President 612.849.1982 Mobile Nathaniel.cote@cobeckconstruction.com of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E Pl o t t e d : 12 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 3 2 : 5 3 P M of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E Pl o t t e d : 12 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 3 2 : 5 4 P M of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E Pl o t t e d : 12 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 3 2 : 5 4 P M Gradient Financial - Significant Trees Phase One Construction Tree Survey by :S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists, Inc. 405 Hardman Ave. South St. Paul, MN 55075 Mark Rehder (651) 451-8907 Significant Trees to Remain TAG SPECIES COND DBH Northing Easting 6817 Cottonwood 6 16 199901.537 560535.986 6818 Cottonwood 6 15 199922.733 560538.437 6820 Oak, red 6 15 199930.097 560517.693 6826 Cottonwood 6 20 199927.918 560510.148 6827 Ash, green 4 11 199916.826 560506.268 6828 Cottonwwod 6 15 199889.41 560496.335 6830 Oak, bur 4 10 199932.165 560490.124 6833 Cottonwwod 6 24 199929.339 560472.776 6836 Cottonwwod 3 12 199928.378 560448.661 6840 Oak, bur 3 10 199990.342 560395.029 6842 Willow, back 3 28 199898.142 560422.923 6848 Oak, red 3 20 199972.199 560323.892 6849 Oak, bur 5 12 199998.299 560337.655 6851 Oak, red 3 17 199989.437 560355.231 6853 Oak, pin 4 25 200103.951 560331.006 6878 Linden, littleleaf 5 16 200113.995 560378.931 6879 Linden, littleleaf 5 12 200035.969 560531.305 Total 278 Significant Trees to Be Removed TAG SPECIES COND DBH Northing Easting 6821 Oak, bur 5 11 199947.42 560518.634 6822 Oak, bur 6 11 199963.939 560522.11 6832 Oak, red 5 15 199940.443 560473.828 6852 Oak, pin 5 19 200084.087 560337.523 6876 Honeylocust 5 19 200001.986 560502.584 6877 Honeylocust 5 11 200092.149 560375.851 Total 86 Summary Total caliper of significant trees:364 inches Tot caliper of trees to be removed 86 inches Tree removal allowance - 10%36 inches Total caliper of mitigated trees 50 inches Total caliper of replacement trees req'd 25 inches Condition is based on a scale of 0-9. Zero being a dead tree and 9 being the perfect tree DBH stands for diameter at breast height Gradient Financial - Significant Trees Phase Two Construction Tree Survey by :S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists, Inc. 405 Hardman Ave. South St. Paul, MN 55075 Mark Rehder (651) 451-8907 Significant Trees to Remain TAG SPECIES COND DBH Northing Easting 6812 Oak, white 6 14 199888.423 560564.857 6814 Oak, white 5 12 199902.035 560557.568 6815 Oak, pin 5 10 199905.141 560560.029 6816 Oak, white 4 10 199893.424 560546.403 6872 Oak, red 5 12 199920.576 560643.441 6883 Honeylocust 3 12 200105.042 560743.281 Total 70 Significant Trees to Be Removed TAG SPECIES COND DBH Northing Easting 6803 Oak, white 5 11 199914.476 560583.236 6809 Oak, white 5 10 199899.662 560570.596 6810 Oak, bur 5 13 199883.931 560566.428 6811 Oak, white 5 13 199873.598 560562.338 6862 Ash, green 4 16 200226.16 560754.457 6863 Ash, green 4 17 200219.386 560950.286 6864 Ash, green 4 17 200187.622 560946.194 6865 Ash, green 4 18 200141.806 560948.251 6866 Ash, green 3 17 200106.555 560957.383 6867 Ash, green 3 15 200055.927 560951.817 6868 Ash, green 4 18 200011.858 560951.809 6869 Ash, green 4 16 199976.605 560949.859 6870 Ash, green 4 19 199953.25 560960.579 6885 Honeylocust 3 12 200094.025 560890.702 Total 212 Summary Total caliper of significant trees:292 inches Total caliper of trees to be removed 212 inches Tree removal allowance - 10%29 inches Total caliper of mitigated trees 183 inches Total caliper of replacement trees req'd 92 inches Condition is based on a scale of 0-9. Zero being a dead tree and 9 being the perfect tree DBH stands for diameter at breast height GARAGE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PR O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y L1.0 GAJ 10/08/14 LE X I N G T O N A V E . N . W. COUNTY ROAD F Date of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was License No. L13154 GRADIENT SIG TREE 14-1003.DWG /Layout1 10-06-14 Permit Set Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: Submittal: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer: W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s Pl o t t e d : 10 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 4 9 : 2 1 A M Sheet Index: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2014 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com Arden Hills, Minnesota 4105 Lexington Ave N Suite 100 Arden Hills, MN 55126 EX I S T I N G PR O P E R T Y BO U N D A R Y PR O P O S E D P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y 4' - 0 " EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DR I P E D G E O F T R E E DR I P E D G E O F T R E E PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 L2.0 GAJ 10/08/14 Date of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was License No. L13154 GRADIENT SIG TREE 14-1003.DWG /Layout1 10-06-14 Permit Set Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: Submittal: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer: W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s Pl o t t e d : 10 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 4 9 : 2 7 A M Sheet Index: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2014 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com Arden Hills, Minnesota 4105 Lexington Ave N Suite 100 Arden Hills, MN 55126 GARAGE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PR O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y LE X I N G T O N A V E . N . W. COUNTY ROAD F EX I S T I N G P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PR O P O S E D P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH POLYETHYLENE STRAP 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED PRACTICES IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELING IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING FROM TREE. BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH MULCH - 4" DEEP. NO MULCH IN CUT BACK WIRE BASKET CONTACT WITH TRUNK - SEE SPECS. ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE. 3.5'' CAL B.B.REDMOND LINDEN AUTUMN FIRE SEDUM SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. Inermis "Skycole" STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY 3'' CAL B.B. 2 3 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 COMMON HACKBERRY BUR OAK DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE AUTUMN MAGIC BLACK CHOKEBERRY #2 CONT #2 CONT #1 CONT #1 CONT 2' O.C. 2' O.C. 3'' CAL B.B. 3'' CAL B.B. (2) COMMON HACKBERRY (2) BUR OAK (3) SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST (2) REDMOND LINDEN (69) AUTUMN FIRE SEDUM 2 2 Quercus macrocarpa Celtis occidentalis Tilia american "Redmond" 3' O.C. (1) SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST (70) DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 70 69 72 3'' CAL B.B.AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. Inermis "Skycole"3'' CAL B.B. 3 7 COMMON HACKBERRY BUR OAK 3'' CAL B.B. 3'' CAL B.B. 3 4 Quercus macrocarpa Celtis occidentalis Acer x freemanii "Jeffersred" (72) STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY 18 (18) AUTUMN BLACK CHOKEBERRY (6) SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST RED OAK 3'' CAL B.B.3 Quercus rubra BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 8' HT / 3" CAL B.B.9 Picea glauca densata SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 3'' CAL B.B.3 Malus "Spring Snow" HURON DOGWOOD COOL SPLASH BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #2 CONT #3 CONT 6' O.C.28 31 (3) BUR OAK(2) RED OAK (1) RED OAK (3) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (6) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (3) AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Cornus racemosa "Hurzam" (28) HURON DOGWOOD STORMWATER TRAETMENT AAREA 4' O.C. ISANTI DOGWOOD #5 CONT 6' O.C.24 Cornus sericea "Isanti" CRISP LEAF SPIREA #2 CONT 4' O.C.61 Spirea x bumalda "Crispa" Sedum spectabile "Autumn fire" Hemerocallis "stella de Oro" Diervilla lonicera Aronia melanocarpa "Autumn Magic" Diervilla sessilifolia "LPDC Podaras" (9) ISANTI DOGWOOD (4) ISANTI DOGWOOD (11) ISANTI DOGWOOD STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY #1 CONT 2' O.C.34 Hemerocallis "stella de Oro" (1) BUR OAK (3) SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE (34) CRISP LEAF SPIREA (31) COOL SPLASH HONEYSUCKLE (34) STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY (26) CRISP LEAF SPIREA (7) ISANTI DOGWOOD HARDWOOD MULCH HARDWOOD MULCH 28" 96" EXISTING PARKING WITH GARAGE EP2.0 GAJ 10/23/14 LE X I N G T O N A V E . N . W. COUNTY ROAD F Date of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was License No. L13154 GRADIENT PARKING 14-1022.DWG /Layout1 10-06-14 Permit Set Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: Submittal: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer: W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s Pl o t t e d : 10 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 4 2 : 1 1 P M Sheet Index: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2014 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com Arden Hills, Minnesota 4105 Lexington Ave N Suite 100 Arden Hills, MN 55126 EXISTING PARKING TOTAL STALLS 276 PROPOSED PARKING / PROOF OF PARKING PP1.0 GAJ 10/23/14 LE X I N G T O N A V E . N . W. COUNTY ROAD F Date of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was License No. L13154 GRADIENT PARKING 14-1022.DWG /Layout1 10-06-14 Permit Set Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: Submittal: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer: W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s Pl o t t e d : 10 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 4 2 : 1 2 P M Sheet Index: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2014 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com Arden Hills, Minnesota 4105 Lexington Ave N Suite 100 Arden Hills, MN 55126 PROPOSED PARKING - PHASE 2 TOTAL STALLS PROOF OF PARKING 267 5 ADD PROOF OF PARKING - 2 ADDITIONAL STALLS PROOF OF PARKING - 3 ADDITIONAL STALLS PROPOSED PARKING - PHASE 1 TOTAL STALLS PROOF OF PARKING 278 2 ADD GARAGE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PR O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y L3.0 GAJ 10/08/14 LE X I N G T O N A V E . N . W. COUNTY ROAD F Date of the State of Minnesota. I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was License No. L13154 GRADIENT SIG TREE 14-1003.DWG /Layout1 10-06-14 Permit Set Sheet No.: Project No.: Sheet Title: Quality Control: Checked By: Project Lead:Drawn By: Review Date: Professional Signature: Submittal: by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing or for completion of this project by others without written approval shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files are instruments of the Consultant professional services CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project CADD Qualification: Professional Services: Project Name: Owner/Developer: W: \ 2 0 1 3 \ 1 3 1 5 4 - G r a d i e n t S h o r e v e w \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s Pl o t t e d : 10 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 4 1 1 : 3 0 A M Sheet Index: Landscape Architecture Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying 2014 7200 Hemlock Lane - Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Telephone: (763) 424-5505 www.LoucksAssociates.com Arden Hills, Minnesota 4105 Lexington Ave N Suite 100 Arden Hills, MN 55126 EX I S T I N G PR O P E R T Y BO U N D A R Y PR O P O S E D P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 Page 1 of 1 Project #: Revision #:Page #:Project:http://www.usa.lighting.philips.com indoorlighting.applications@philips.com outdoorlighting.applications@philipAgent:Specifier:ARCH D Size:10/3/2014 Date:A. Martin Created By:24"x 36"....................Rev. Date R1 R2 R3 R4 R5....................Rev. # Description The calculations set forth herein are based on project specifications provided to PHILIPS. Actual or measured values may differ from forecasted results due to tolerances in calculation methods, testing procedures, component procedures, component performance, measurement techniques and varying field conditions such as, but not limited to, line voltage, temperature, atmospheric/environmental conditions and improper or undocumented lamp burn-in procedures. Further, room dimensions,reflectances, furniture andarchitectural elements within the space may significantly affect calculations.Verification of the calculations herein, including design acceptability, and compliance with any applicable lighting codes is not the responsibility of PHILIPS, and shall be the responsibility of the architect, owner, or owners representative, as applicable. Please refer to Luminaire Schedule for light loss factor (LLF) details used in the calculations.Disclaimer Agent Name Specifer Name 524-10969Gradient Financial R1Rearranged pole locations and added wall mounts 10-3-14 Sc a l e : 1 i n c h = 2 0 F t . H C H C H C H C H C H C H C 9 6 8 9 6 7 9 6 6 9 6 5 9 6 4969 +TW ++TW 963.5+TC 963.91 9 6 4 9 6 5 +TC 963.91 9 6 3 9 6 5 9 6 4 1257 964.4 BC 12 5 8 95 8 . 6 9 BC 1263 963.96 BC 12 6 4 95 9 . 4 6 BC 12 6 5 95 8 . 5 7 BC 12 6 6 95 8 . 5 6 BC 12 6 7 95 8 . 5 5 BC 12 6 8 95 8 . 6 8 BC 12 6 9 95 8 . 3 7 ED G E O F R O A D W A Y 1276 963.41 BC9+++TW 963.5967966TW 9968969970971972 9 6 3 9 6 296 3 RIM 962.5+TW 969.0 +++T T T+TW 968.5 + TW 9 6 1 . 5 + + TW 9 6 1 . 5 TW 9 6 1 . 5 TW 9 6 1 . 5 + S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1S1 S1 S1S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 W W W W W W 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 0. 8 0. 3 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 0 . 6 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 7 1 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 7 1 . 6 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 .4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 3 . 0 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 5 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 .2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.3 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 4 1 . 1 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 6 3 . 1 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 1 3 . 2 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 9 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 .7 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.6 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 9 2 . 1 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 0 2 . 9 3 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 5 3 . 5 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 1 2 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 .8 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.6 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 .7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 .5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 6 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 4 3 . 3 3 . 1 2 . 9 2 . 9 3 . 0 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 .6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 1 . 5 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 1 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 3 3 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 9 3 . 2 3 . 3 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 .7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 0.7 0.3 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 1 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 3 2 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 7 3 . 1 3 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 .7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.4 0.8 0.2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 1 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 4 2 . 7 2 . 9 2 . 9 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 0 3 . 0 3 . 2 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 .5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 0.9 0.2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 9 2 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 9 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 4 2 . 2 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 .6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 2 1 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 9 3 . 1 3 . 7 3 . 8 4 . 2 4 . 0 4 . 3 4 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 1 3 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 1 1 . 9 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 .6 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 9 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 3 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 1 . 6 2 . 2 3 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 5 4 . 3 4 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 5 4 . 6 4 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 1 3 . 1 2 . 9 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 .5 1 . 7 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 7 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 2 0 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 6 3 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 8 4 . 4 3 . 9 4 . 5 4 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 5 5 . 1 4 . 6 4 . 1 3 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 6 3 . 9 4 . 0 3 . 7 2 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 .6 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 3 0 . 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 1 . 3 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 5 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 6 0 . 1 3. 9 4 . 1 4 . 6 4 . 5 4 . 8 3 . 5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 0.2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 0 0 . 3 3. 7 3 . 8 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 3 1 . 6 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 0.1 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 1 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 6 3 . 0 3 . 3 2 . 8 2 . 5 4. 7 3 . 6 3 . 0 2 . 4 1 . 6 0 . 9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.1 0.1 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 3 1 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 7 1 . 3 1 . 9 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 5 3 . 8 3 . 7 3. 5 2 . 8 2 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 0 1 . 0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.1 0. 0 0. 1 0 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 1 . 2 1 . 8 2 . 5 3 . 2 3 . 8 2. 4 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 9 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 9 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 9 1 . 6 0 . 8 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1 . 2 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 8 3 . 1 1 . 6 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 8 1. 1 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 9 3 . 1 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 9 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 1 1 . 9 2. 5 3 . 0 3 . 5 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 2 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 4 2 . 6 3 . 1 2 . 7 2 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 2 1 . 6 3. 5 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 9 3 . 3 2 . 7 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 3 2 . 7 3 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 1 2 . 7 5. 4 4 . 6 4 . 4 4 . 1 3 . 6 2 . 9 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 2 0 . 1 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 9 4 . 2 4 . 3 3 . 8 4.7 4.4 4.0 3.5 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 0.1 0. 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 5 3 . 1 3 . 7 4 . 4 5 . 0 1. 2 1 . 5 4 . 1 3 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 3 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 3 2 . 3 2 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 0 0 . 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 2 . 0 2 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 8 0 . 5 0. 9 1 . 3 1 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 7 0 . 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 1 2 . 0 2 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 2 0. 0 0. 2 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 5 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 9 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 0 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 2 1 . 3 1 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 3 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 1 . 2 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 3 2 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 4 0 . 5 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 9 3 . 1 2 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 0 0 . 3 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 7 1 . 3 1 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l CalcType Ar r a n g e m e n t Ma n u f a c t u r e r De s c r i p t i o n LL F Lu m . L u m e n s Avg Max Min Avg/Min Lu m . W a t t s Ar r . L u m . L u m e n s Ar r . W a t t s Max/Min Units Grid Size (Ft.)Grid Height (Ft.) Ca l c P t s Illuminance BU G R a t i n g 1.16 5.4 0.0 17 S1 SI N G L E N.A.N.A.Fc 10 0 PH I L I P S G A R D C O EC F - 1 - 4 - 2 1 5 L A - 6 4 1 A - N W - I S @ 2 5 ' 0. 8 5 0 15 1 9 5 21 0 . 9 15 1 9 5 21 0 . 9 B2 - U 0 - G 3 Ty p i c a l P a r k i n g A r e a Illuminance 2.08 5.4 0.3 6.93 18.00 6 W SI N G L E PH I L I P S G A R D C O EC F - W S - 4 - 1 6 0 L A - 4 8 1 A - N W @ 1 8 ' 0. 8 5 0 14 9 5 5 15 8 14 9 5 5 15 8 B3 - U 0 - G 3 Fc RE: Gradient Financial - County Review https://mail.metro-inet.us/...iSBwAciLz%2fxj17TZSMff0qC8oAADiMubJ7AAAciLz%2fxj17TZSMff0qC8oAAH8h8uA2AAAJ&a=Print[10/2/2014 7:08:00 AM] RE: Gradient Financial - County Review Lux, Joseph [Joseph.Lux@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US] Sent:Monday, September 29, 2014 2:11 PM To:Ryan Streff Cc:Fischer, Nicklaus [Nicklaus.Fischer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US]; Brown, Robert S. (PW) [robert.s.brown@co.ramsey.mn.us] Hi, Ryan: We’ve reviewed the plans you sent for the Gradient Financial site work and its possible effects on the Lexington Avenue/County Road F project and do not see any conflicts or areas of concern for Ramsey County. We have the following comments: Ø The staging plan that Gradient has provided that shows improvements to the western portion of their lot and reconstruction of the driveway access to County Road F as Phase 1 is something we can work with to ensure that access to the Gradient site is maintained throughout the Lexington Avenue project. We would stage our project to complete work on County Road F and reconnect the driveway prior to any closure of the Gradient driveway on Lexington. Ø We are negotiating with Gradient for acquisition of both temporary and permanent easements. It is our intention to compensate them for the loss of any trees and shrubs that will need to be removed for construction and they will replant after construction, as shown in their plans. We will also compensate them for curb that must be removed and for other impacts to their parking lot, as well as some other items, such as relocation of their sign. At this time, the plan is for the County to perform the necessary removals along Lexington Avenue, construct Lexington Avenue (including replacing the existing trail), and grade the slope, letting Gradient complete the parking lot work and landscaping. These items are still negotiable, but this plan seems to be acceptable to both Gradient and the County. Ø The Gradient driveway location shown on the plans is acceptable. It is our understanding that if it is completed prior to our project, they would simply pave to the edge of County Road F and when we construct curb and gutter in that area, we would saw-cut the driveway and install a concrete apron during curb construction. The plans show a two-lane driveway, but we would allow one ingress lane and two egress lanes, at Gradient’s option. Providing separate right and left-turn lanes might make egress more efficient, but, again, this is Gradient’s option. I’ve copied Nick Fischer and Bob Brown on this e-mail- Nick and Bob, please send Ryan any additions or corrections that may be necessary. Nick will send a layout of our planned intersection improvements separately. Please let us know if there are any questions. Joe Lux Joseph Lux Senior Planner Ramsey County Public Works 1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112-3933 651-266-7114 From: Ryan Streff [mailto:RStreff@cityofardenhills.org] LE X I N G T O N A V E N U E COUNTY ROAD F The zoning district designations represented on this map correspond to the City of Arden Hills official Zoning Map. Questions concerning the Zoning Map should be directed to City Hall. Zoning designations are subject to change. Please refer to the Zoning Code for complete information. Map Date: September 30, 2014 P:\GIS_Data\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-030 Gradient Financial Site Plan Review 14-030 Parking Lot Modifications 4105 Lexington Ave N ¯Property Boundary Lake Josephine NEW BUSINESS – 8E MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #14-031 Applicant: Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills Property Location: 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard Request: Master and Final Planned Unit Development Amendment Requested Action Motion to approve Planning Case 14-031 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Johanna Shores redevelopment project located at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the sixteen (16) conditions in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council. Background In November 2010, the City Council approved a Master and Final PUD for the redevelopment of the Johanna Shores care facility at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard in Planning Case 10-012. This case also included the approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat and the rezoning of the property from R-2 to R-4 to bring the mix of residential uses on the property into compliance with the Zoning Code. The redevelopment project was divided into Phase I and Phase II and also included certain utility improvements and the demolition of two existing buildings on the site. The existing McKnight Care Center has remained in its current location and will not be altered as part of the redevelopment. Phase I of the project has largely been completed. This phase entailed the demolition of the existing Lakeview Building and the construction of a new building in its place. The new primary facility contains 162 units. The units are comprised of 72 assisted living units, 36 memory care units, and 54 independent senior apartments. At the time the Master PUD was approved, there City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 1 of 12 were discussions about including four hospice units in the new Lakeview Building. However, this program was not implemented and the four units were, therefore, never constructed. Certain utility improvements on the site, including the reconstruction of an existing sanitary sewer line along the easterly frontage of Lake Johanna, were also required to be completed as part of Phase I. All of these improvements have been completed within the schedule outlined. The second phase of the approved Master PUD includes the construction of two brownstone- style apartment buildings that would house a total of 36 independent senior apartments. These buildings were to be built on the site of the existing Sutton Place apartments. Presbyterian Homes has since demolished the Sutton Place apartment building in preparation for undertaking Phase II of the project. Construction on the brownstone apartments is expected to commence in the spring of 2015, and be completed before December 31, 2016. In conjunction with Phase II of the Master PUD, the applicant will also be undertaking road improvements along County Road D adjacent to their property as outlined in the Contract for Private Development between the City and Presbyterian Homes. 1. Overview of Request The proposed PUD Amendment includes four separate components: • Amend the configuration of the Brownstone Buildings to be completed in Phase II. • Revise the Construction Schedule outlined in the PUD Development Agreement to reflect the delay in the expected start date on the Brownstone Buildings. • Reallocate the four hospice units that were to be constructed in the Lakeview Building to the Brownstone Buildings as independent senior units increasing the number of units in the Brownstone Buildings from 36 to 40. • Amend the conditions in the PUD Agreement to allow for the removal of the required speed bumps on the County Road D driveway if the traffic study to be completed one year following the completion of the redevelopment project supports such removal. The layout for Phase II was altered due to challenges presented by the elevation change between the Brownstone Buildings and the primary facility. As originally proposed, the Phase II buildings would have been situated closer to the intersection of County Road D and Lake Johanna Boulevard with a large area of open space and steeper grades between them and the main building. Given the senior population that will be residing in the buildings, the only way to mitigate this challenge would have been through constructing long and inefficient switchbacks. By reorienting the Brownstone Buildings closer to the Lakeview Building and constructing into the side of the sloping terrain, Presbyterian Homes will be able to provide entries to the buildings that are at grade and significantly closer to the main building and trail system. An additional benefit of this design change is that the buildings will be connected with a link at the garage and ground level that will better tie the buildings together visually. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 2 of 12 The second component of the amendment is to revise the construction schedule outlined in the PUD Development Agreement. Under the current schedule, Presbyterian Homes was required to begin site work for the first Brownstone Building in September 2013, and begin construction of the second Brownstone Building in March of 2014. Additionally, all final landscaping and hardscaping improvements for the property were to be completed by the spring of 2015. While Sutton Place has been demolished and the area stabilized, for efficiency reasons Presbyterian Homes does not expect to start on the construction of the Brownstone Buildings until 2015. Therefore, they are requesting that the construction schedule be amended to reflect the revised anticipated schedule. Presbyterian Homes would be required to obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit and commence preliminary site work for the Brownstone Buildings by December 31, 2014, and to begin construction on the buildings by June 30, 2015. All final landscaping and hardscaping improvements would need to be completed by December 31, 2016. Presbyterian Homes is requesting that the four hospice units approved under the Master PUD for the Lakeview Building be reallocated to Brownstone Buildings as independent senior apartments. If approved, the number of units in the buildings would increase from 36 to 40. As discussed previously, the hospice units were approved for the Lakeview Building but were not constructed because a hospice program was not implemented by the organization. The space in the Lakeview Building where the hospice units were to be constructed is now being used as additional storage space for the facility and will not be used for residential purposes. This request would not increase the total of 410 dwelling units approved in the original Master PUD and the approved net density of 18.2 units per acre would remain unchanged. The final component is a revision to the conditions in the PUD Development Agreement regarding traffic calming. Presbyterian Homes is now in the process of installing three speed bumps on the County Road D driveway between the parking lot of the primary building and where the Brownstone underground parking will be located, as required by the PUD Development Agreement. The purpose of these speed bumps was to deter residents from using the County Road D access driveway and to limit the amount of traffic that would cut through Wheeler Avenue in Roseville. Presbyterian Homes has noted that the heavy use of the County Road D access has not materialized and that the City of Roseville has taken the additional step of temporarily closing off access to Wheeler Avenue from County Road D. The request is to amend the PUD Development Agreement to state that upon the completion of the required Wheeler Avenue and County Road D Traffic Study one year after the full redevelopment of the site if it is determined that the three speed bumps are not necessary for traffic calming purposes that Presbyterian Homes be permitted to remove them. Presbyterian Homes has provided a project narrative included in Attachment A that outlines the details of the PUD Amendment request. A complete plan set including civil and architectural plans, as well as elevation drawings of the Brownstone Buildings, is included in Attachment C. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 3 of 12 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process: The Planned Unit Development process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for development that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may make exceptions to setbacks, lot coverage, parking requirements, signage, building materials, or landscaping requirements. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and improve the overall design of a project. While the PUD process allows the City to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any conditions imposed on the PUD must have a rational basis related to the expected impact of the development. A PUD cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district. In the original Master PUD approval, the City granted Presbyterian Homes flexibility in terms of building height and density. The maximum building height in the R-4 District is 35 feet and the Lakeview Building was permitted to be constructed at an average height of 46 feet above grade. Prior to receiving approval of the Master PUD, the Johanna Shores facility operated under two Conditional Use Permits, which granted approval for a net density of 17.6 units per acre on the property. The maximum density in the R-4 District is 12 units per acre. The Master PUD included an additional 14 units on the property, which increased the approved net density for the site to 18.2 units per acre. Plan Evaluation A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission at their October 8, 2014, Regular Meeting. The staff report to the Planning Commission on this case is included in Attachment H. The following section provides a summary of the key differences between the Master and Final PUD previously approved in Planning Case 10-012 and what is being proposed in the amendment request. 1. R-4 District Zoning Regulations – Chapter 13 Section 1320 – District Provisions Building and Landscaping Coverage The proposed reconfiguration of the Brownstone Buildings would result in a combined footprint of 37,765 square feet. Each building would have a footprint of 17,269 square feet. As originally approved in the Master PUD, the Brownstone Buildings were to be a combined 33,238 square feet. The increased footprint area is largely due to the new link that will connect the two separate buildings, which will add 3,227 square feet of area, and the additional four dwelling units that have been proposed to be constructed in the buildings. Between the existing Lakeview Building and the McKnight Care Center, the current structure coverage is 110,985 square feet. The City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 4 of 12 proposed Brownstone Buildings would bring the total structure coverage to 148,750 or 15.4 percent. No more than 25 percent of a property in this district may be covered by structures. The proposed reconfiguration of Phase II would not significantly decrease the landscape coverage on the property from what was approved in the Master PUD. With the addition of the Brownstone Buildings and associated parking areas the total area in landscaping would be 682,381 square feet, or 70.8 percent. The minimum landscape lot coverage is 65 percent in the R-4 District. Setbacks The new layout of the Brownstone Buildings would not result in a substantial change to the setbacks originally approved for the buildings. The most significant difference is that the eastern building would be shifted approximately 50 feet further west from the property line along Shorewood Drive. As proposed, the Brownstone Buildings meet all of the setback requirements. County Road D (Southern Boundary) Lake Johanna Blvd. (Western Boundary) Eastern Boundary Approved Master PUD (PC 10-012) 65’ – 8” 40’ 175’ (approximately) Proposed (PC 14-031) 64’ 40’ 225’ (approximately) Required 40 feet (Front) 40 feet (Front) 5 Feet (Side) Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Tree Preservation The Tree Preservation Plan approved in Planning Case 10-012 required a total of 1,658 caliper inches of replacement trees to mitigate significant trees removed for the project. During Phase I, an additional 118 caliper inches of trees were removed which were identified for preservation in Lot Size (SF) Building Coverage (SF) Building Coverage Landscape Coverage (SF) Landscape Coverage Approved Master PUD (PC 10-012) 963,215 150,904 15.7% 695,789 72.2% Proposed (PC 14-031) 963,215 148,750 15.4% 682,381 70.8% Required 25% or less 65% or more City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 5 of 12 the plan. The City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance states that unapproved tree loss is required to be replaced at a rate of two caliper inches for every one caliper inch removed. This would increase the number of required replacement trees to 1,894 caliper inches. To date, Presbyterian Homes has planted 1,800 caliper inches of trees, leaving a current deficit of 94 caliper inches. The Tree Preservation Plan has been updated to reflect the removal of one additional significant tree during Phase II that will require a replacement amount of 7.5 caliper inches. This brings the total required tree plantings for Phase II to 101.5 caliper inches. The Landscape Plan shows 140 caliper inches of trees to be planted on the Brownstone Buildings site. The following table outlines these numbers in greater detail: B. Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria The City adopted special regulations for multi-family housing developments in September 2012, following to the approval of the Master PUD for the Johanna Shore redevelopment in November 2010. These regulations were amended in March 2014 to update the minimum unit size standards. The requirements are codified in Section 1325.045 – Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Condition Use Permit Criteria. Upon consultation with the City Attorney, staff was advised that the independent senior apartments in the Brownstone Buildings are considered to be Caliper Inches Total Existing Significant Trees (PC 10-012) 6,241 Proposed Removal – Phases I & II (PC 10-012) 3,939 Replacement Trees Required* (PC 10-012) 1,658 Unapproved Tree Loss – Phase I 118 Additional Proposed Removal – Phase II (PC 14-031) 15 Replacement Trees Required* (PC 14-031) 1,901.5 Replacement Trees Proposed 1,940 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. Replacement trees for unapproved removal is calculated at two caliper inches for every one caliper inch removed. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 6 of 12 a “multi-family dwelling” use and that the PUD Amendment should be evaluated in light of the current provisions found in Section 1325.045. The apartments in the Brownstone Buildings would be comprised of one-bedroom and two- bedroom units. Presbyterian Homes has provided information on the size of each of these units and all meet the minimum unit size standards. The development would also provide a sufficient number of enclosed parking stalls and amount of indoor and outdoor common areas for recreation and leisure activities. While enclosed bicycle parking is required to be provided at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit, no bicycle parking has been proposed. Given that the housing will be for senior residents, staff believes it is reasonable for this provision to be waived. 2. Lighting The Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department reviewed the submitted lighting plan, which is a requirement for multi-family housing developments. The Public Safety Services Division raised concerns about the arrangement and type of light fixtures used and recommended changes to address safety and visibility on the site. Presbyterian Homes has since updated the lighting plan based on this feedback (Attachment F). The Planning Commission has recommended as a condition of approval that the lighting plan receive final approval from the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3. Traffic Review The original Master PUD in Planning Case 10-012 was reviewed by the engineers from the cities of Roseville and Arden Hills, as well as the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer. No concerns regarding the project’s impact on traffic in the area were raised at that time. Presbyterian Homes provided existing and anticipated traffic counts with their application so that staff could better evaluate the trips generated by the site. The proposed additional four independent senior apartments in the Brownstone Buildings are not expected to substantially alter the traffic counts provided in 2010. While the additional independent senior units will likely generate more day-time trips throughout the day by retired residents, the elimination of the four hospice care units will reduce the number of peak am and pm trips generated by employees of the facility. The number of residents in the Brownstone Buildings relying on the County Road D driveway to access the site is expected to be approximately 30. There are 20 units in the building facing County Road D and Presbyterian Homes has stated that typically half of the units are occupied by a single resident and half by couples. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 7 of 12 4. Additional Review The Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshall have reviewed the submitted application and have no additional comments regarding the proposed reconfiguration of the Brownstone Buildings. All final grading, erosion, and utility plans will be subject to approval by the City Engineer before the issuance of any permits. All final building plans will be subject to the Fire Marshal approval before the issuance of any permits. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-031 at their regular meeting on October 8, 2014. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment I. The Planning Commission offers the following fifteen (15) findings of fact for consideration: General Findings: 1. The property is located in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. 2. The City Council approved the Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development Plans for the property in Planning Case 10-012 (Resolution No. 2010- 067) on November 29, 2010. 3. The PUD Development Agreement requires that any significant changes to the approved plans be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s zoning regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. 5. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the approved Master and Final PUD for revised development plans for Phase II of the redevelopment project. 6. The revised development plans for Phase II of the project are in substantial conformance with the Master and Final PUD plans approved in Planning Case 10-012. 7. The applicant is requesting an Amendment to revise the Construction Schedule outlined in the PUD Development Agreement to reflect the delay in the expected start date on the Brownstone Buildings. 8. Under the revised Construction Schedule, Phase II of the project would still be completed prior to December 31, 2016, as required by the Contract for Private Development signed by and between the City and Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills, Inc. 9. The applicant is requesting an Amendment to the approved Master and Final PUD to reallocate the four hospice units that were to be constructed in the Lakeview Building to the Brownstone Buildings as independent senior apartment units. 10. The additional four independent senior apartment units proposed for the Brownstone Buildings would not increase the 410 units and net density of 18.2 units per acre approved for the property in Planning Case 10-012. 11. The applicant is requesting an Amendment to revise the conditions in the PUD Agreement to allow for the removal of the required speed bumps on the County Road D City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 8 of 12 driveway if the traffic study to be completed one year following the completion of the redevelopment project supports such removal. 12. The Master and Final PUD approved in Planning Case 10-012 are in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City’s Zoning Code. 13. Where the Master and Final PUD are not in conformance with the City’s Zoning Code, flexibility has been granted and/or conditions have been placed on the approval to mitigate the nonconformity. 14. The proposed Amendments will not result in any new nonconformity not already approved in the Master and Final PUD for the property. 15. The proposed Amendments to the Master and Final PUD are not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this request and unanimously recommends approval (5-0) of Planning Case 14-031 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Johanna Shores redevelopment project located at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following sixteen (16) conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. An amendment to the PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The document shall be executed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The Developer shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit and commence initial site work on Phase II by December 31, 2014. 4. The Developer shall obtain a building permit for Phase II by June 30, 2015, or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval’s expiration date. Extension requests must be submitted in writing to the City at least 45 days prior to the expiration date. 5. The Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the PUD Development Agreement. 6. The Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 9 of 12 of a building permit. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 7. The Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 8. The Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be held by the City for two years after installation of landscaping and used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of landscaping, or developer default. 9. The Developer shall provide the City with all necessary permits, including, but not limited to Rice Creek Watershed District and NPDES, prior to the issuance of the City Grading and Erosion Control Permit. 10. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. The final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any City permits. 12. A lighting and security plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 13. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 14. The Developer shall complete certain road improvements on Sandeen Road prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase II. These road improvements shall be defined as a one and one-half inch (1-1/2”) bituminous mill and overlay between Lake Johanna Boulevard and the northern access driveway to the property. The Developer shall construct the Sandeen Road improvements at Developer’s cost and in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City. 15. The plans and specifications for the sidewalk improvements within the County Road D right-of-way shall be subject to approval by the City. A right-of-way permit shall be obtained for all work completed within the Ramsey County right-of-way. 16. If the Developer elects to undertake the construction of the County Road D Improvements as outlined in the Contract for Private Development, the Developer must provide written notice to the City of its intent to exercise this option, which notice must be delivered before the date of any initial improvement hearing held by Roseville under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 regarding the County Road Improvements. The Developer shall construct the County Road Improvements at Developer’s cost, in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City, and shall substantially complete such construction by December 31, 2016. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 10 of 12 Options 1. Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 14-031 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Johanna Shores redevelopment project located at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans. The motion to approve should specify if all four of the Amendments are recommended for approval or less than all, and whether the recommendation for approval is to include all sixteen (16) conditions in the October 27, 2014, Report to the City Council or as modified by the City Council. 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 14-031 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Johanna Shores redevelopment project located at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard based on the following findings of fact… 3. Table: Motion to table Planning Case Planning Case 14-031 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Johanna Shores redevelopment project located at 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Resident Comment The City has received one email from a resident of Roseville (3088 Shorewood Lane) who has stated their opposition to the request. A resident of Arden Hills (3151 Shorewood Drive) attended the public hearing for this case and provided the Planning Commission with a letter addressing their concerns. These correspondences are included in Attachment G. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 16, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by November 15, 2014 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The City may extend the review period beyond the 120 days, with the applicant’s permission. Attachments A. Land Use Application and Project Narrative B. Site and Aerial Maps C. PUD Plan Set – Civil and Architectural Plans City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 11 of 12 D. Colored Illustrations – Illustrative Site Plan and Perspective Drawings E. Landscaping Plan – Phase II F. Lighting and Photometric Plan – Phase II G. Resident Comments H. Planning Commission Report, October 8, 2014 I. Planning Commission Draft Minutes, October 8, 2014 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for October 27, 2014 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-031 - PUD Amendment - Presbyterian Homes\Memos_14-031 Page 12 of 12 Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills, Inc. Amendment of the Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development Plans for Johanna Shores September 2014 Project Description Introduction In November of 2010 Presbyterian Homes received approvals from the City of Arden Hills for a Planned Unit Development at the Johanna Shores campus location 3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard. This approval included 410 units of senior housing as follows: Existing Skilled Care Center of 208 beds, 54 Independent Apartments, 112 Assisted Living of which 36 are Memory Care and 36 Independent Brownstone apartments. As part of the redevelopment both the Lakeview and Sutton Place buildings would be demolished. A commencement and completion schedule was also established for expected phases of the project. The final project work includes improvements to County Road D to be completed by December 31, 2017. Presbyterian Homes has completed Phase 1A, Phase 1B and Utility Improvements and Demolition of Lakeview within the schedule outlined. PHS completed the demolition of Sutton Place ahead of schedule. Phase II, the Brownstones, are to commence by December 31, 2014 and be completed by December 31, 2016. We plan to apply for and obtain a permit before the end of 2014 with Completion still ahead of the original required date of December 31, 2016. County Road D improvements will also be completed ahead of the December 31, 2017. Amendment Request PHS is requesting to: Amend the configuration of the Brownstones of Phase II. Shift 4 units to Brownstones but keep same density on site Request Description PHS is requesting to amend the layout of Phase II of the PUD. As we developed more detailed plans of this Phase, we could not overcome the challenges presented by the elevation changes between the Phase II are and the main building. With the Brownstones sitting closer to the corner with more green space between them and the main building, there is a fairly steep grade change to traverse. This proved difficult to overcome especially for our aging population. 1 9/1/2014 Lengthy and inefficient switchbacks were not resident friendly and would put residents out in the elements longer as they traverse between the Brownstones and the main building for activities and dining options. This led us to the proposed configuration. This layout shifts the buildings away from the corner and brings them closer to the main building. This creates entries at a grade much closer to the main building. There is only a 3’ difference now between the brownstone and the main parking lot. This is a much easier slope to negotiate as well as to maintain in inclement weather. This design also decreases the length of the walk outside so that residents have a safer and shorter distance to traverse. This layout also allows us to connect the Brownstones through a link at both the garage and the ground level. This creates a better sense of community between the two Brownstones. At the lower level the link provides a club room space that overlooks the pond and provides the close access point. On the ground level the link with be constructed of lots of glass to diminish its appearance. An outdoor deck space will be created above the club room. This creates some wonderful outdoor gathering space for these residents. This layout also improved access to the west brownstone’s garage entrance by making it more straight on. The Brownstones are proposed to be 20 apartments in each. This is a shift in the number of units from 36 to 40. There are 4 units that were listed as assisted living in the PUD that were not constructed in the main building. We are requesting to move these 4 units to the Brownstones as senior apartments. The overall density of the PUD approval will remain the same as approved. These 4 units were envisioned to be hospice units in the lower level of the Phase 1B assisted wing. PHS had begun a pilot hospice program at another campus. That program was still in the pilot phase when we proposed the expansion of this program into the Johanna Shores campus. It would have consisted of the 4 units with a central family gathering area and separate private entrance. However, this program has not been developed further than the pilot site at this point and is still undergoing evaluation. Hence, these units were not constructed with Phase 1B. This lower level has been turned into a central storage and maintenance area for the site. The apartments in the Brownstones are proposed to be a mix of one and two bedroom apartments ranging from 900 to 1778 square feet. Ground level apartments have a front door/porch, second floor apartments have a deck. Some apartments have a sunroom. There is resident storage on each floor. The garages provide 66 parking stalls and trash rooms with space for dumpsters. Trash will be wheeled out for pickup. There will be a directional sign at each garage drive entrance for way finding but no new monuments. There will be 40 surface parking spots. The revised plan follows the original tree preservation plan with the exception of one pine tree that tipped over and had to be removed. Those additional caliper inches have been added to the landscaping plan in additional trees. 2 9/1/2014 Pending approval of this PUD Amendment, a permit for the construction of the Brownstones will be requested. Constructing them at the same time instead of staged as in the initial PUD will create an efficient construction schedule. Sutton Place has already been removed and the area stabilized. We are also requesting that the traffic study which is required at full occupancy of the project include a study and evaluation of the effectiveness and need for the speed bumps along our east driveway. If the study finds that they are unnecessary that they be able to be removed. We will also be meeting with the public works directors of both Arden Hills and Roseville to discuss if the closing of Wheeler is to be a permanent solution and will know this outcome prior to the traffic study period. This will allow one final look at this issue when the campus is fully built out, traffic counts established and the future of Wheeler determined. Our team looks forward to working with the City of Arden Hills as this PUD Amendment request comes before you for consideration. The balance of this submission includes the site plan, civil plans and building plans and renderings. Thank you. 3 9/1/2014 Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills Redevelopment 2010 PUD Master Plan Amendment Request for Phase II Johanna Shores Brownstones Project Location is part of the Johanna Shores Campus Phase II parcel is at the intersection of Lake Johanna Boulevard and County Rd D. Address Identified tentatively by City were 3230 and 3240 for these buildings Main building is 3200 and the Care Center is 3220 Owner: PHS of Arden Hills, Inc. 2845 Hamline Avenue North Roseville MN 55113 Developer: Senior Housing Partners 3116 Fairview Avenue North Roseville MN 55113 Contact: Pamela Belz pbelz@seniorpartners.com 651-631-6316 phone Architect: Pope Architects 1295 Bandana Blvd North Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55108 Contact: Dan Weatherman dweatherman@popearch.com 651-789-1613 phone Civil/Survey: Clark Engineering 621 Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Mathew Johnson mojohnson@clark-eng.com 763-545-9196 phone 4 9/1/2014 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 977.4 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet977.40488.71 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevard 5,865 Enter Map Description Notes 3200 Lake Johanna Boulevar d Ma p Dat e: O c to ber 2, 2 014P:\G I S_Da ta \P la nning \P la nning C ase s\201 4\PC 14-03 1 Property Bound aryK Count y Ro ad D L a k e J o h a n n a B l v d Sandeen Rd Approximate area of Phase II ,V V X H V D Q G 5 H Y L V L R Q V &R P P L V V L R Q 1 R 'UD Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ 6+ ( ( 7 ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘ 38 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 3 0 & ? 5 H Y L W B 3 U R M H F W V ? 3 U R M H F W 3 D W K ? B - R K D Q Q D % U R Z Q V W R Q H V B 5 &( 1 7 5 $ / B E U \ D Q U Y W $ 7, 7 / ( 6 + ( ( 7 ':1- 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 +2 0 ( 6 -2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 1 6+ ( ( 7 1 8 0 % ( 5 6 + ( ( 7 1 $ 0 ( 3 5 , & , 1 * 3 8 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / *( 1 ( 5 $ / $ 7 , 7 / ( 6 + ( ( 7 Ɣ Ɣ $ 3 $ 5 7 , 7 , 2 1 7 < 3 ( 6 $ % % 5 ( 9 , $ 7 , 2 1 6 Ɣ $ & 2 ' ( ' $ 7 $ &, 9 , / & 6 , 7 ( ' ( 0 2 / , 7 , 2 1 3 / $ 1 Ɣ & 2 9 ( 5 $ / / 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 Ɣ & & , 9 , / 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 Ɣ & * 5 $ ' , 1 * 3 / $ 1 Ɣ Ɣ & 6 , 7 ( 8 7 , / , 7 < 3 / $ 1 Ɣ & 6 7 2 5 0 : $ 7 ( 5 3 2 / / 8 7 , 2 1 3 / $ 1 6 : 3 3 Ɣ & 6 7 2 5 0 : $ 7 ( 5 3 2 / / 8 7 , 2 1 3 / $ 1 6 : 3 3 Ɣ & & , 9 , / ' ( 7 $ , / 6 Ɣ & & , 9 , / ' ( 7 $ , / 6 Ɣ & 7 5 ( ( 3 5 ( 6 ( 5 9 $ 7 , 2 1 / , 6 7 Ɣ 68 5 9 ( < 6 8 5 9 ( < Ɣ $5 & + , 7 ( & 7 8 5 $ / $ 2 9 ( 5 $ / / 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 Ɣ $ 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 ' ( 0 2 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 Ɣ $ 2 9 ( 5 $ / / / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 Ɣ $ 2 9 ( 5 $ / / / ( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 Ɣ $ 2 9 ( 5 $ / / / ( 9 ( / 7 : 2 ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 Ɣ $ / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 $ Ɣ Ɣ $ / ( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 $ Ɣ Ɣ $ / ( 9 ( / 7 : 2 ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 $ Ɣ Ɣ $ / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / / ( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 6 / , 1 . Ɣ Ɣ $ 8 1 , 7 3 / $ 1 6 Ɣ Ɣ $ ( ; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 6 $ Ɣ Ɣ $ ( ; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 $ / , 1 . Ɣ Ɣ $ 5 2 2 ) 3 / $ 1 $ Ɣ $ % 8 , / ' , 1 * 6 ( & 7 , 2 1 6 Ɣ $ 2 3 ( 1 , 1 * 6 & + ( ' 8 / ( ' 2 2 5 7 < 3 ( 6 ) 5 $ 0 ( 7 < 3 ( 6 Ɣ 35 2 - ( & 7 ' , 5 ( & 7 2 5 < 2: 1 ( 5 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 + 2 0 ( 6 2 ) 0 1 1 2 5 7 + + $ 0 / , 1 ( $ 9 ( 52 6 ( 9 , / / ( 0 1 3+ 2 1 ( &2 1 7 $ & 7 3 $ 0 % ( / = &, 9 , / &/ $ 5 . ( 1 * , 1 ( ( 5 , 1 * / , / $ & ' 5 , 9 ( 1 2 5 7 + 0, 1 1 ( $ 3 2 / , 6 0 1 3+ 2 1 ( &2 1 7 $ & 7 0 $ 7 7 + ( : - 2 + 1 6 2 1 9, & , 1 , 7 < 0 $ 3 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 + 2 0 ( 6 - 2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( % 5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 , 1 1 ( 6 2 7 $ $5 & + , 7 ( & 7 32 3 ( $ 6 6 2 & , $ 7 ( 6 , 1 & ( 1 ( 5 * < 3 $ 5 . ' 5 , 9 ( 67 3 $ 8 / 0 1 3+ 2 1 ( &2 1 7 $ & 7 % 5 < $ 1 6 & + / ( , ) 6, 7 ( %8 , / ' , 1 * ' $ 7 $ 6+ ( ( 7 , 1 ' ( ; *5 2 6 6 % 8 , / ' , 1 * $ 5 ( $ 6 1D P H / H Y H O $ U H D /, 1 . / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / 6 ) %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( % / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / 6 ) %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ / 2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / 6 ) %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( % 7 2 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 1 R W ( Q F O R V H G /, 1 . 7 2 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 6 ) %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ 7 2 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 6 ) %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( % 7 2 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 1 R W ( Q F O R V H G %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ 7 2 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 6 ) 6 ) 81 , 7 $ 5 ( $ 6 1$ 0 ( ' ( 6 & 5 , 3 7 , 2 1 $ 5 ( $ & 2 8 1 7 81 , 7 $ % ( ' 5 2 2 0 6 ) 81 , 7 % % ( ' 5 2 2 0 6 ) 81 , 7 & % ( ' 5 2 2 0 & 2 5 1 ( 5 6 ) 81 , 7 ' % ( ' 5 2 2 0 ( 1 ' 6 ) 81 , 7 ( % ( ' 5 2 2 0 ' ( 1 6 ) 72 7 $ / 8 1 , 7 6 72 7 $ / $ 5 ( $ PH A S E I I / $ . ( - 2 + $ 1 1 $ % / 9 ' 6 + 2 5 ( : 2 2 ' ' 5 , 9 ( & 2 8 1 7 < 5 2 $ ' ' 6 $ 1 ' ( ( 1 5 2 $ ' / $ . ( - 2 + $ 1 1 $ % / 9 ' 6 + 2 5 ( : 2 2 ' ' 5 , 9 ( / ( 5 ( 7 5 , 3 5 $ 3 5 , 3 5 $ 3 % , 7 8 0 , 1 2 8 6 0 1 « 2 # 4 - + 0 ) 01 2# 4 - + 0 ) / $ . ( - 2 + $ 1 1 $ % / 9 ' 6 + 2 5 ( : 2 2 ' ' 5 , 9 ( & 2 8 1 7 < 5 2 $ ' ' 6 $ 1 ' ( ( 1 5 2 $ ' / $ . ( - 2 + $ 1 1 $ % / 9 ' 6 + 2 5 ( : 2 2 ' ' 5 , 9 ( / ( 5 ( 7 5 , 3 5 $ 3 5 , 3 5 $ 3 % , 7 8 0 , 1 2 8 6 $ 7+ ( / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 $ 1 ' 6 , = ( 2 ) ( ; , 6 7 , 1 * 8 7 , / , 7 , ( 6 $ 5 ( 6 + 2 : 1 , 1 $ 1 $ 3 3 52 ; , 0 $ 7 ( / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 )2 5 , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 9 ( 5 , ) < $ / / 8 7 , / ,7 , ( 6 : , 7 + 7 + ( $ 3 3 5 2 3 5 , $ 7 ( 8 7 , /, 7 < & 2 0 3 $ 1 , ( 6 2 7 + ( 5 $3 3 5 2 3 5 , $ 7 ( $ * ( 1 & , ( 6 $ 1 ' 2 % 6 ( 5 9 ( ' ( ; , 6 7 , 1 * & 2 1 ' , 7 , 2 1 6 % (; , 6 7 , 1 * 6 , 7 ( & 2 1 ' , 7 , 2 1 6 $ 1 ' 7 2 3 2 * 5 $ 3 + < 6 + 2 : 1 2 1 7 + ( ' 5 $ : , 1 * 6 $ 5( $ 3 3 5 2 ; , 0 $ 7 ( $1 ' 0 $ < 1 2 7 5 ( 3 5 ( 6 ( 1 7 $ / / ( ; , 6 7 , 1* 6 , 7 ( & 2 1 ' , 7 , 2 1 6 7 + ( & 2 1 7 5 $ &7 2 5 6 + $ / / 9 ( 5 , ) < (; , 6 7 , 1 * 6 , 7 ( & 2 1 ' , 7 , 2 1 6 $ 1 ' 1 2 7 , ) < 7 + ( $ 5 & + , 7 ( & 7 , 1 : 5 , 7 , 1 * 2 ) $ 1 < ' , 6 & 5 ( 3 $ 1 & , ( 6 : , 7 + '5 $ : , 1 * 6 & 5( ) ( 5 7 2 7 + ( * ( 1 ( 5 $ / 1 2 7 ( 6 ) 2 5 2 7 + ( 5 $ 3 3 / , & $ % / ( , 1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 6, 7 ( 3 / $ 1 * ( 1 ( 5 $ / 1 2 7 ( 6 ,V V X H V D Q G 5 H Y L V L R Q V &R P P L V V L R Q 1 R 'UD Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ 6+ ( ( 7 ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘ 38 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 $ 0 & ? 5 H Y L W B 3 U R M H F W V ? 3 U R M H F W 3 D W K ? B - R K D Q Q D % U R Z Q V W R Q H V B 5 &( 1 7 5 $ / B E U \ D Q U Y W $ 29 ( 5 $ / / 6 , 7 ( 3/ $ 1 ':1- 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 +2 0 ( 6 -2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 1 $ 29 ( 5 $ / / 6 , 7 ( 3 / $ 1 35 , & , 1 * 6 ( 7 5( 9 , 6 , 2 1 & 2 8 1 7 < 5 2 $ ' ' 0 1 «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ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘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ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘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ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘ .( < 3 / $ 1 % $ 38 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 3 0 & ? 5 H Y L W B 3 U R M H F W V ? 3 U R M H F W 3 D W K ? B - R K D Q Q D % U R Z Q V W R Q H V B 5 &( 1 7 5 $ / B E U \ D Q U Y W $ /( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3/ $ 1 $ ':1- 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 +2 0 ( 6 -2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 1 $ /( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 % 5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ % 6 , 0 12 5 7 + 35 , & , 1 * 6 ( 7 '1 '1 $ $ $ $ $ 75 $ 6 + (/ ( 9 /2 % % < +6 . 3 5( 6 , ' ( 1 7 67 2 5 $ * ( 67 $ , 5 &2 5 5 , ' 2 5 &2 5 5 , ' 2 5 67 $ , 5 81 , 7 & 81 , 7 $ 81 , 7 $ 81 , 7 ' 81 , 7 ' 81 , 7 % 81 , 7 % 81 , 7 $ 81 , 7 ( 81 , 7 % 23 ( 1 7 2 %( / 2 : '$ 7 $ '( & . 7 < 3 52 2 ) 52 2 ) ,V V X H V D Q G 5 H Y L V L R Q V &R P P L V V L R Q 1 R 'UD Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ 6+ ( ( 7 ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘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ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘ .( < 3 / $ 1 % $ 38 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 3 0 & ? 5 H Y L W B 3 U R M H F W V ? 3 U R M H F W 3 D W K ? B - R K D Q Q D % U R Z Q V W R Q H V B 5 &( 1 7 5 $ / B E U \ D Q U Y W $ /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / /( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3/ $ 1 6 / , 1 . ':1- 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 +2 0 ( 6 -2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 1 $ /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 / , 1 . $ /( 9 ( / 2 1 ( ) / 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 / , 1 . 12 5 7 + 12 5 7 + 35 , & , 1 * 6 ( 7 ., 7 & + ( 1 /$ 8 1 ' 5 < %$ 7 + %( ' 5 2 2 0 /, 9 , 1 * '( & . 68 1 5 2 2 0 /, 1 ( 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ., 7 & + ( 1 /$ 8 1 ' 5 < %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %$ 7 + : , &/ 2 6 ( 7 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %( ' 5 2 2 0 %( ' 5 2 2 0 /, 9 , 1 * '( & . 68 1 5 2 2 0 /, 1 ( 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 68 1 5 2 2 0 '( & . /, 9 , 1 * ., 7 & + ( 1 %( ' 5 2 2 0 /$ 8 1 ' 5 < %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %( ' 5 2 2 0 : , & / 2 6 ( 7 ', 1 , 1 * 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 68 1 5 2 2 0 '( & . /, 9 , 1 * ., 7 & + ( 1 %( ' 5 2 2 0 /$ 8 1 ' 5 < %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %( ' 5 2 2 0 : , & / 2 6 ( 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 68 1 5 2 2 0 '( & . /, 9 , 1 * ., 7 & + ( 1 '( 1 %( ' 5 2 2 0 /$ 8 1 ' 5 < %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %$ 7 + 0$ 6 7 ( 5 %( ' 5 2 2 0 : , & / 2 6 ( 7 : , & / 2 6 ( 7 %( ' 5 2 2 0 /, 1 ( 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 81 , 7 3 / $ 1 1 2 7 ( 6 $ 8 1 , 7 3 / $ 1 6 6 + 2 : 1 ) 2 5 8 1 , 7 , 1 7 ( 5 , 2 5 ,1 ) 2 5 0 $ 7 , 2 1 2 1 / < 6 ( ( 3 / $ 1 6 ) 2 5 (; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 : $ / / ' , 0 ( 1 6 , 2 1 6 :, 1 ' 2 : /2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 $ 1 ' ( ; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 % 5 , & . $ 1 ' 6 7 2 1 ( /2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 % 81 , 7 & 2 1 ) , * 8 5 $ 7 , 2 1 6 0 $ < % ( 5 ( 9 ( 5 6 ( ' )5 2 0 8 1 , 7 3 / $ 1 6 6 (( 3 / $ 1 6 ) 2 5 ( ; $ & 7 &2 1 ) , * 8 5 $ 7 , 2 1 & &/ 2 6 ( 7 6 + ( / 9 ( 6 7 2 % ( 0 ( / $ 0 , 1 ( : , 7 + : 2 2 ' 52 ' 7 < 3 , & $ / 6 ( ( $ ) 2 5 0 2 8 1 7 , 1 * + ( , * + 7 6 ' &2 2 5 ' , 1 $ 7 ( 0 ( & + $ 1 , & $ / 8 1 , 7 / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 $1 ' 6 2 ) ) , 7 / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 9 ( 5 , ) < 0 ( & + $ 1 , & $ / 8 1 , 7 /2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 : , 7 + 2 : 1 ( 5 3 5 , 2 5 7 2 1 6 7 $ / / $ 7 , 2 1 6( ( 5 ( ) / ( & 7 ( ' & ( , / , 1 * 3 / $ 1 6 ) 2 5 62 ) ) , 7 /2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 ( &2 2 5 ' , 1 $ 7 ( / , * + 7 ) , ; 7 8 5 ( / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 28 7 / ( 7 3 + 2 1 ( $ 1 ' 6 : , 7 & + / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 : , 7 + (/ ( & 7 5 , & $ / 9 ( 5 , ) < / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 : , 7 + 2 : 1 ( 5 35 , 2 5 7 2 , 1 6 7 $ / / $ 7 , 2 1 ) 12 7 8 6 ( ' * 6( ( 2 9 ( 5 $ / / 3 / $ 1 6 $ 1 ' ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 6 ) 2 5 (; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 : $ / / ' , 0 ( 1 6 , 2 1 6 $ 1 ' ( ; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 0$ 6 2 1 5 < / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 6 + 81 , 7 , 1 7 ( 5 , 2 5 : $ / / 6 7 2 % ( 7 < 3 ( % 6 8 1 / ( 6 6 12 7 ( ' 2 7 + ( 5 : , 6 ( 6 ( ( 6 + ( ( 7 $ ) 2 5 : $ / / 7< 3 ( 6 , 1 6 8 / $ 7 ( $ / / 6 7 8 ' & $ 9 , 7 , ( 6 : + ( 5 ( :$ 6 7 ( 2 5 : $ 7 ( 5 / , 1 ( 6 $5 ( / 2 & $ 7 ( ' , 6( ( 6 + ( ( 7 $ ) 2 5 8 1, 7 2 3 ( 1 , 1 * 6 & + ( ' 8 / ( - :$ / / ' , 0 ( 1 6 , 2 1 6 $ 5 ( 7 2 & ( 1 7 ( 5 / , 1 ( 2 ) 67 8 ' 7 < 3 , & $ / ' , 0 ( 1 6 , 21 6 1 2 7 ( ' $ 6 & / ( $ 5 $5 ( % $ 6 ( ' 2 1 & $ % , 1 ( 7 2 5 ) , ; 7 8 5 ( 6 , = ( 6 & / ( $ 5 63 $ & ( 5 ( 4 8 , 5 ( 0 ( 1 7 . $1 * / ( ' : $ / / 6 $ 5 ( $ 6 6 8 0 ( ' 7 2 % ( $ 7 '( * 5 ( ( 6 8 1 / ( 6 6 1 2 7 ( ' 2 7 + ( 5 : , 6 ( / &2 2 5 ' , 1 $ 7 ( ( / ( & 7 5 , & $ / $ 1 ' &2 0 0 8 1 , & $ 7 , 2 1 6 3 $ 1 ( / / 2 & $ 7 , 2 1 : , 7 + (/ ( & 7 5 , & $ / $ 1 ' 9 ( 5 , ) < : , 7 + 2 : 1 ( 5 3 5 , 2 5 7 2 ,1 6 7 $ / / $ 7 , 2 1 0 6( ( $ $ ) 2 5 ) , % ( 5 * / $ 6 6 6 + 2 : ( 5 '( 7 $ , / 6 7 < 3 9 ( 5 , ) < 6 + 2 : ( 5 6 , = ( 6 3 5 , 2 5 7 2 )5 $ 0 , 1 * $ ' - $ & ( 1 7 : $ / / 6 ,V V X H V D Q G 5 H Y L V L R Q V &R P P L V V L R Q 1 R 'UD Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ 6+ ( ( 7 ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘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ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘ .( < 3 / $ 1 % $ 38 ' 6 8 % 0 , 7 7 $ / 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 3 0 & ? 5 H Y L W B 3 U R M H F W V ? 3 U R M H F W 3 D W K ? B - R K D Q Q D % U R Z Q V W R Q H V B 5 &( 1 7 5 $ / B E U \ D Q U Y W $ (; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 (/ ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 6 $ ':1- 35 ( 6 % < 7 ( 5 , $ 1 +2 0 ( 6 -2 + $ 1 1 $ 6 + 2 5 ( 6 3+ $ 6 ( %5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 6 $5 ' ( 1 + , / / 6 0 1 $ ($ 6 7 ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 % 5 2 : 1 67 2 1 ( $ % 6 , 0 $ 62 8 7 + ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 % 5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ % 6 , 0 $ :( 6 7 ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 % 5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( $ % 6 , 0 (; 7 ( / ( 9 . ( < 1 2 7 ( 6 $ 6 3 + $ / 7 6 + , 1 * / ( 6 & / $ 6 6 $ & 2 1 7 , 1 8 2 8 6 5 , ' * ( 9 ( 1 7 3 5 ( ) , 1 0 ( 7 $ / ) $ 6 & , $ $ 1 ' 6 2 ) ) , 7 3 5 ( ) , 1 0 ( 7 $ / * 8 7 7 ( 5 2 8 7 / , 1 ( 2 ) ) 2 8 1 ' $ 7 , 2 1 : 2 2 ' & / $ ' : , 1 ' 2 : 6 / , 1 . 7 < 3 9 , 1 < / & / $ ' : , 1 ' 2 : 6 % 5 2 : 1 6 7 2 1 ( 7 < 3 9 , 1 < / 6 / , ' , 1 * * / $ 6 6 ' 2 2 5 $ / 8 0 , 1 8 0 ( 1 7 5 < ' 2 2 5 , 1 6 8 / $ 7 ( ' + 0 ' 2 2 5 3 5 ( ) , 1 , 6 + ( ' ) , % ( 5 & ( 0 ( 1 7 / $ 3 6 , ' , 1 * & 2 / 2 5 3 5 ( ) , 1 , 6 + ( ' ) , % ( 5 & ( 0 ( 1 7 / $ 3 6 , ' , 1 * & 2 / 2 5 ; & 2 0 3 2 6 , 7 ( : 2 2 ' 7 5 , 0 3 7 - $ 0 % 6 , / / 7 < 3 ; & 2 0 3 2 6 , 7 ( : 2 2 ' 7 5 , 0 3 7 + ( $ ' 7 < 3 ; & 2 0 3 2 6 , 7 ( : 2 2 ' 7 5 , 0 3 7 ; & 2 0 3 2 6 , 7 ( : 2 2 ' 7 5 , 0 3 7 & ( 0 ( 1 7 % ' : 5 $ 3 3 ( ' & 2 / 8 0 1 ) $ & ( 2 ) ' ( & . 6 0 2 2 7 + & 0 8 % $ 1 ' & 0 8 5 2 & . ) $ & ( & 0 8 & 0 8 & 2 1 7 5 2 / - 2 , 1 7 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 3 , ( 5 & $ 3 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 6 , / / : 2 2 ' 7 5 ( / / , 6 $ / 8 0 , 1 8 0 5 $ , / , 1 * 6 < 6 7 ( 0 & 2 0 3 2 6 , 7 ( : 2 2 ' & 2 5 1 , & ( $ / 8 0 , 1 8 0 , 1 6 8 / $ 7 ( ' * $ 5 $ * ( ' 2 2 5 35 , & , 1 * 6 ( 7 72 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 72 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 75 8 6 6 % ( $ 5 , 1 * /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / 72 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 72 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 75 8 6 6 % ( $ 5 , 1 * /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / $ 72 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 72 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 75 8 6 6 % ( $ 5 , 1 * /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / $ 72 3 5 ( & $ 6 7 72 6 8 % ) / 2 2 5 75 8 6 6 % ( $ 5 , 1 * /2 : ( 5 / ( 9 ( / ,V V X H V D Q G 5 H Y L V L R Q V &R P P L V V L R Q 1 R 'UD Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ 6+ ( ( 7 ϭϮ ϵ ϱ E E > s E ͕ ^ h / d Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ^d ͘ W h > ͕ D E ϱ ϱ ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ͳ Ϯ ϳ ϯ ϱ ;ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϵ Ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ͮ & y ; ϲ ϱ ϭ Ϳ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Ͳ ϭ ϭ Ϭ ϭ ǁ ǁ ǁ ͘ Ɖ Ž Ɖ Ğ Ă ƌ Đ Ś ͘ Đ Ž ŵ WK W ^ ^ K / d ^ ͕ / E ͘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