HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-03-14-WS ---AI�EN�HILLS
Approved: December 8, 2014
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
NOVEMBER 3, 2014
6:00 P.M. -ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council work
session at 6:02 p.m.
Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave
McClung, and Ed Werner
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer;
Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler;
City Planner Ryan Streff; and City Clerk Amy Dietl
1. AGENDA ITEMS
A. TCAAP
Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that Keith Ulstad and Rick McKelvey,
United Properties, were in attendance to have a discussion on retail development with the City
Council and to respond to Council questions regarding retail locations, market 'demand, desired
amenities, and design criteria. She noted that as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the
City will need to adopt a TCAAP Future Land Use Map which may or may not be consistent with
the approved Master Plan Land Use Map. She explained that staff was seeking direction from the
Council on the Future Land Use Map.
Rick McKelvey, United Properties, introduced himself to the Council.
Tricia Pitchford, Cushman & Wakefield, introduced herself to the Council noting that she
worked for a sister company of United Properties.
Keith Ulstad, United Properties, provided the Council with his comments and opinions on how to
best configure the TCAAP retail sites.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 2
Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the comments from United Properties
representatives as they have a vested interest in the site.
Mr. Ulstad understood this concern and stated he would try to provide objective and unbiased
comments and encouraged the Council to invite other commercial developers in for discussions.
Mayor Grant questioned how the site needs for the retail area would change without immediate
development on the thumb.
Mr. Ulstad commented that he has not considered this delay in development. He believed that
the retail component would not be possible without the interchange improvements. He stated the
size of the retail would be critical in order to attract traffic from Highway 10 and I-35W, while
also meeting the needs of the local residents. It was his opinion that 20 contiguous acres would be
needed to provide an anchor(grocer) and diversity in the retail area.
Councilmember Holden reviewed the proposed locations for retail in TCAAP.
Mr. Ulstad recommended that 20 acres of retail be located west of the spine road adjacent to the
County Road H interchange. He believed that more convenience retail could be located along
Highway 96 and east of the spine road.
Mr. McKelvey explained that the 20 acres would be the first piece to draw customers off of the
freeway with an attractive anchor and a secondary attraction with restaurants or entertainment.
Councilmember Holden asked why this site would be attractive to passing traffic when
compared to Roseville.
Mr. McKelvey reported this site would be incredibly easy to access.
Ms. Pitchford stated this was the reason a grocer was being recommended as the strongest and
best use for the site. She reported that once the residential area became fully developed, the
grocer would become more stable.
Further discussion ensued regarding the potential anchor for the retail site.
Mr. Ulstad commented that Target may have bigger ticket items, but requires fewer trips than a
grocer. He indicated that grocery stores have been the best single driver for retail and get people
in the habit of going to the same place. He further discussed how the retail should be phased from
the west side to the east side of the spine road. He suggested that the Council begin with a grocer
as this would lead to surrounding retail.
Ms. Pitchford stated that smaller convenience would want to be in the field of vision of the
grocer. She envisioned a very cohesive, well thought out and organized plan for the retail site.
She explained this would assist with leasing the property.
Councilmember Holden questioned if the developers had any comparative developments in mind
for the TCAAP site.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 3
Ms. Pitchford discussed several local projects that were 20 acres and had a Main Street look.
She reported that access and visibility off of I-35W was critical.
Mayor Grant wanted the development to be successful and appreciated the input. He wanted to
see the proposed retail reach the critical mass.
Councilmember Holden asked if retail along Highway 96 would survive.
Ms. Pitchford anticipated a bank, daycare and other quick freestanding convenience users would
work in this area. She believed that the Highway 96 corridor was greatly underserved, given the
traffic volume. She stated a gas station may work in this area.
Councilmember Holden questioned if the 20 acres for retail would have any civic area.
Mr. Ulstad stated he did not anticipate having any civic area within the 20 acres of retail.
Mayor Grant understood the proposed 20 acres would help guarantee a successful site. He
inquired if this size should be increased by five acres.
Mr. Ulstad commented that 25 acres may be better than 20 acres; however this may depend on
the surrounding uses. He reported that the additional five acres would assist in creating a
transitional space.
Councilmember Holmes stated that she supported 20 acres of retail west of the spine road and
asked if there were any thoughts of having retail on the main level with apartments above. She
stated that she liked the retail development she recently saw in Mendota Heights.
Mr. Ulstad explained this type of development would require structured parking and more
expensive building design. He did not anticipate this would be proposed for the 20 acres of retail.
He stated that typically, vertical mixed developments were driven by land constraints. He stated
that Phase II of the retail may be better suited for vertical mixed uses.
Ms. Pitchford indicated that after time, residents find it difficult to live above to retail.
Councilmember Holden questioned how the Town Center area would develop with 20 acres of
retail west of the spine road.
Ms. Pitchford explained that a cohesive strong retail area near I-35W would be the starting point.
From there the Town Center area could expand.
Mr. Ulstad stated that the Town Center area could include small retail, mixed use, multi-family
and office space, in addition to a civic area. He reported it would be difficult to fully plan this
area until the needs of the market were closely evaluated. He commented that connectivity would
be important.
City Administrator Klaers advised that the location of the spine road may need to be shifted in
order to accommodate the visibility needs for the proposed retail and office use.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 4
Mayor Grant requested further comment on this topic.
City Administrator Klaers indicated staff and consultants have discussed a slight relocation of
the spine road to the east to accommodate a nice shaped parcel for the office space that was
adjacent to the retail to the south. If this would happen, then land uses in the Town Center are
impacted.
Councilmember Holden expressed frustration with this suggestion.
Councilmember Holmes stated this relocation would be possible because it would not interfere
with the wetlands and for this reason, she believed it made sense to accommodate development on
the west side of the road.
Mayor Grant inquired how far to the east the spine road would be shifted.
City Administrator Klaers was uncertain and noted Kimley Horn was redrafting a map to reflect
this adjustment.
Mayor Grant wanted to see the TCAAP development be multi-dimensional in order to draw
people to the site.
Councilmember Holden asked if the County was interested in shifting the spine road.
Public Works Director Maurer reported the County wanted to see all development on TCAAP
successful and was exploring this option. The County was funding the Kimley Horn redrafting of
the map.
Mr. Ulstad commented that the revisions were not being driven by the need for retail. Rather, the
development should have as much land as far north on the west side of the spine road for visibility
and access purposes.
Councilmember McClung stated he was beginning to care less about the flex business and was
more interested in two Class A business sites with retail. He believed that the more Class A office
space the site had the better.
Mr. Ulstad indicated that a better class of restaurants would be willing to locate in this area if
there was an abundance of office space and daytime users.
Councilmember Holmes inquired if staff needed any additional guidance from the Council.
Community Development Director Hutmacher thanked the Council for their comments related
to retail development. She summarized that it appeared that the Council was generally supportive
of more retail on the west side of the spine road and the change in the spine road alignment. In
order to maintain a large Class A office site, changes may be needed with respect to the alignment
of the spine road.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 5
Mayor Grant thanked the representatives for their input. He then turned the Council's
conversation to the residential vision; the wants and needs for the Hill and the Creek.
Councilmember Holmes liked the idea of starting with higher density near the Town Center then
moving towards less density as the site approaches AHATS. She did not like the idea of the
Creek neighborhood being more expensive than the Hill. She believed there should be two or
three designs in the Creek and three or four in the Hill.
Mayor Grant thought the Hill and the Creek would have four different housing types, with large
and small lots. He anticipated that 15% would be cottage homes or manor homes within the
Creek neighborhood. The remaining 85% would be larger single-family homes. Within the
Creek, he saw the outer ring as nicer or larger homes and then within the site, a variety of homes
could be built. In the Hill neighborhood he would have 20% cottage homes and 80% single
family homes. He was in favor of the fanning out concept with housing variety.
Councilmember Holden asked how much of the Creek and Hill neighborhoods were buildable
land.
Public Works Director Maurer anticipated that less than 15% of the land would be needed for
roads and the remainder of the acreage would be used for houses.
Mayor Grant recommended that the two neighborhoods (Creek and Hill) end up at about 430
units.
Councilmember Holmes stated that she supported some small multifamily use in the Hill and
Creek neighborhoods, and that the City needs to be flexible in laying out the residential
developments.
Councilmember McClung supported flexibility. He agreed with higher density in the west and
lower density in the east in the Creek neighborhood. He supported some townhomes and small
multifamily development in the Hill neighborhood.
Councilmember Werner supported townhomes on the west side and single family lots on the
east side in both neighborhoods.
Councilmember Holden wanted to see all single family detached homes in the Creek
neighborhood. She supported some high quality townhomes on the east side of the Hill
neighborhood along with some nice town or twin homes, along the water feature.
Community Development Director Hutmacher stated if the Council wanted to see a change in
placement of land uses between the approved Master Plan Land Use Map and the Future
Comprehensive Land Use Map, then Council input is needed.
Councilmember Holden understood that the retail size would change and she believed the
Council did not have enough information about the water feature in order to provide further
comment on the residential areas.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 6
Councilmember McClung agreed.
Mayor Grant requested staff to put together some residential development options for the Hill
and Creek neighborhoods.
B. Building Official Vehicle
Community Development Director Hutmacher stated the current inspections vehicles consist
of a 2004 Chevrolet Blazer and a 2003 F250 obtained from our public works department. Both
vehicles are 10 years old or more and are requiring more repairs each year. Staff is seeking to
replace the F250 with a new vehicle. The total price with taxes and fees is $20,000. Previously
approved in this year's budget was $20,000 for an inspections vehicle. Staff would continue to
use the 2004 Chevy Blazer mainly for inspection and code enforcement use. The F250 would go
back to our public works department. Staff requested the Council consider approval of$20,000
for the purchase of a used 2013 Ford Escape.
Mayor Grant questioned what repairs the existing inspection vehicle needed.
Public Works Director Maurer was uncertain, but noted with the limited value of the vehicle it
could still be used during the summer months.
Councilmember Werner asked how many miles would be put on this vehicle each year.
Public Works Director Maurer anticipated that less than 5,000 miles per year would be put on
the vehicle.
Councilmember Holden commented that the Council budgeted $20,000 for this vehicle and for
this reason, she would support the purchase.
Councilmember McClung had no comment on the request.
Mayor Grant recommended this item be placed on a future Consent Agenda.
C. Update on County Road E Project
City Administrator Klaers stated there are two public hearings scheduled for Monday,
November 10, 2014, on the proposed improvements to County Road E. One is a project public
hearing and one is an assessment public hearing. At this work session prior to the public hearings,
staff would like to discuss with the Council what is being planned so far for the presentations,
review some of the project cost estimates, and hear from the Council what they would like to have
presented and explained at the hearings.
City Administrator Klaers reported that in round numbers the total project cost was $2 million.
He commented that the County would be covering $1.5 million of this expense and the City
would have to assess or pay the remaining $500,000.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 3, 2014 7
Public Works Director Maurer noted the sidewalk expense for Davidson was estimated to be
$50,000. This expense would be paid up front by Davidson and would not be part of the
assessment project.
Further discussion ensued regarding the sidewalk and how the project would be assessed.
Councilmember Holmes asked the amount that would be assessed to the B-2 property owners.
Public Works Director Maurer explained that the assessment amount has been lowered to just
under $200,000. He provided further comment on the items that were included within the
proposed B-2 area-wide assessments. It was noted that the trees would be paid for by the City.
He discussed the style and number of lights that would be installed along the corridor.
Councilmember Holmes inquired if staff has received any complaints or knew of any property
owners that would contest their assessment.
Public Works Director Maurer stated staff has had three calls regarding the assessments, but
has received no objections.
2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES
Councilmember Holmes stated she received an email from the League of Minnesota Cities
regarding City benefits. She explained she would be forwarding this email to City Administrator
Klaers for distribution to the entire Council. She reported that the League of Minnesota Cities felt
strongly that the City Council should not make any changes to the City's benefits packet for 2015.
She recommended the Council review the letter prior to the next Council meeting.
Councilmember Werner discussed the new blue lights on the Highway 96 signals and explained
these were installed by law enforcement to assist with ticketing drivers that ran red lights.
Councilmember Holden indicated she would like to receive a report from staff on the recent
TCAAP Charrette.
City Administrator Klaers commented he had a handout from Kimley Horn that would be
distributed to the Council.
ADJOURN
Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council work session at 8:50 p.m.
dw_AA=Q� L;H '41 V, -
Amy Dietl David Grant
City Clerk Mayor
It..-
,-AIREN HILLS
Request for Special City Council Work Session
A special meeting may be called by the Mayor or by any two Councilmembers.
Topics for meeting: A. Building Official Vehicle
B. TCAAP
C. Update on County Road E Project
Requested Date: 11/03/14
Requested time: 6:00 pm
Open meeting X Closed meeting
Signature of person(s) making request:
hm4i'&i
10/29/14
Mayor or Councilmember Date
Councilmember Date
-This section to be completed by City staff-
Date received: 10 / .;1,9 / I q
Date meeting to be held: 11/03/14
Time of meeting: 6:00 pm
Location: City Hall
All necessary posting and notices have been completed.
to a
Signature of City rk Date
City of Arden Hills * 1245 West Highway 96 + Arden Hills,MN + 55112-5743
Phone 651-792-7800 * Fax 651-634-5137 * www.cityofardenhills.org