HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-14-WSAGENDA ITEMS
TCAAP Infrastructure Team Update -Storm Drainage And Wetlands Issues
TCAAP Infrastructure Team
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF
Recycling RFP Discussion
Ryan Streff, City Planner
CC MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
If more time is needed, the special work session may reconvene after the
regular City Council meeting.
Mayor:
David Grant
Councilmembers:
Brenda Holden
Fran Holmes
Dave McClung
Ed Werner
Special City Council
Work Session Agenda
November 10, 2014
5:30 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651 -792 -7800
Website :
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
CALL TO ORDER
1.
1.A.
Documents:
1.B.
Documents:
2.
Page 1 of 1
DATE: November 10, 2014
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Patrick Klaers, City Administrator
FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: TCAAP Infrastructure Team Update
Storm Drainage and Wetland Issues
At Monday’s work session the Infrastructure Team (Jon Horn, Project Manager; Beth Kunkel,
Task Leader; and Pam Massaro, Storm Water Engineer) will be in attendance to give the second
update on the storm water and wetland issues. The first update on these issues was back on July
14th.
Attached is a memo from Kimley Horn outlining the issues to be discussed with the Council
along with three exhibits. Also attached are the minutes from the July 14th Work Session.
Attachments
Attachment A: Kimley Horn Memo
Attachment B: Exhibit A
Attachment C: Exhibit B
Attachment D: Exhibit C
Attachment E: July 14 Work Session Minutes
AGENDA ITEM – 1A
MEMORANDUM
Memorandum
Date: November 10, 2014
To: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director
From: Beth Kunkel, Kimley‐Horn
Pamela Massaro, Wenck
Subject: TCAAP Natural Resource (Green) Corridor Design Update
The purpose of this memo is to provide Council with an update on the progress made on the design of
the stormwater/wetland management plans for the TCAAP site since the July 2014 work session.
Regulatory Requirements
There are a number of federal, state and local water resource regulations that need to be met on the
TCAAP site. Given the complexity and potential conflicts between these regulations, we have been
meeting with the respective agencies to confirm requirements. The four key agencies and their
respective approvals required are listed below:
MnDOT has jurisdiction over wetland and drainage within MnDOT right‐of‐way, including the
interchange areas of CR H and CR I. Wetland and drainage permits will be required from MnDOT
for modifications to these interchanges that impact wetlands and surface water runoff.
MN DNR has jurisdiction over Rice Creek (within the top of banks of the Rice Creek channel)
including any changes to the creek alignment, new crossings and floodplain impacts. A public
waters permit and floodplain review will be required for the creek realignment, crossing and
floodplain impacts adjacent to Rice Creek.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has jurisdiction over waters of the US which includes certain
wetlands and streams. A Clean Water Act Section 404 permit will be required for wetland and
creek impacts.
Rice Creek Watershed District has jurisdiction over TCAAP site storm water runoff, erosion
control, floodplains, wetlands, and creek crossings. RCWD approval is required in each of these
areas via a comprehensive permit.
Design Parameters
Given the overlap and complexity of these various requirements, design priorities were established to
meet as many of these requirements within the natural resource corridor as possible, with the following
priorities in this order:
1. Accommodate all wetland replacement for infrastructure impacts (Spine/Thumb Roads and
utilities, stormwater ponds, associated site grading, maintenance access, CR I/Thumb Road
access)
2. Accommodate all required stormwater rate control and infiltration for Spine/Thumb Roads
3. Accommodate stormwater rate control for TCAAP site development
4. Provide maintenance access to stormwater features in form of a recreational, multi‐use trail
5. Provide wetland mitigation for site development to the extent feasible
6. Provide infiltration for site development (residential, retail, and commercial parcels) to the
extent feasible
7. Accommodate other passive recreation opportunities where feasible
Existing Conditions
As shown on the attached Exhibit A, the existing site drainage is split with roughly 60 percent of the site
draining to Rice Creek and the southern 40 percent of the site draining to Round Lake. The RCWD
requires that the existing volumes to these waters be maintained in the future condition, and the peak
discharge rate be reduced as the site is developed.
There are 14.4 acres of wetland on the site (Exhibit B). The RCWD and Army Corps have different
jurisdiction and mitigation requirements for the wetlands impacted. A minimum of 6.5 acres of
mitigation is needed on site to satisfy RCWD and Corps requirements for the site infrastructure
(construction of the Spine and Thumb roads, CR I roundabout, natural resource corridor grading) as
shown in Exhibit C. This amount does not include the creek realignment, however that work is expected
to be self‐mitigating.
Grading Concept Plan
The current infrastructure plan shows the conceptual layout of the natural resource corridor (Exhibit C).
We are continuing to coordinate with the regulatory agencies on the design details and there are
revisions that may occur as planning and permitting proceed.
This grading work will be completed as a part of the TCAAP public infrastructure improvements. The
proposed grading plan accomplishes the following priorities:
1. Provide all wetland replacement for the public infrastructure impacts
2. Accommodate all required stormwater rate control and infiltration for Spine/Thumb Roads
3. Accommodate stormwater rate control for all TCAAP site development
4. Provide maintenance access to stormwater features in form of a recreational, multi‐use trail
7. Provide some space for passive recreation opportunities along the easterly portion of the site
Depending on further coordination with the Army Corps and RCWD, there is room in the natural
resource corridor to meet either priority 5 or priority 6, however which is implemented has not been
determined. If a permit from the Corps cannot be obtained for wetland impacts of future development,
the proposed grading plan would not provide wetland replacement (priority #5) for future site
development within the natural resource corridor, requiring individual developments that impact
wetlands to address mitigation needs separately as a part of their planning and design activities. In that
case, infiltration BMPs would be incorporated into the natural resource corridor (priority #6) rather than
additional wetland mitigation.
What will it look like?
The design details are still in the planning stage, however we have a number of images to be presented
at the work session that depict the general look of the different features that may be included within
the natural resource corridor.
!
!
!
!
!
!
£¤10
®
®
®
®
§¨¦35W
§¨¦35W
96
H
I
TO ROUND LAKE
TO RICE CREEK
TO RICE CREEK
TO RICE CREEK
OUTFALL #1
OUTFALL #2
OUTFALL #3
OUTFALL #4
OUTFALL #5
OUTFALL #6
¯0 700350
Feet
TCAAP InfrastructureExhibit A. Existing Drainage
Legend
!outfall_location
Existing Drainage Break
Proposed Land Use Areas
£¤10
§¨¦35W
H
I
¯0 700350
Feet
TCAAP InfrastructureExhibit B. Delineated Wetland Boundaries
Legend
Delineated Wetland Boundaries
Project Study Area
EXHIBIT C
INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
(651) 266-7100 (FAX) (651) 266-7110
Arden Hills, MN 55112
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
ENGINEERING/OPERATIONS
Department of Public Works
RAMSEY COUNTY
ARDEN HILLSSPECIAL CITYCOUNCIL WORKSESSION – JULY14, 2014 3
FireChief Boehlke indicatedthattheFireDepartment owned theland. Hecommented that ifthe
decisionwas made toclosethestation, thedepartmentwoulddiscuss alternative planswiththe
Cityregarding service coverage. Hebelievedthattheproperty couldbesoldwiththebuildings
andanyproceedsofthesalewouldgointotheFireDepartment’sGeneralFund.
Councilmember Holmes askediftheFireDepartmentplanned tocloseFireStationNo. 1inthe
nearfuture.
FireChief Boehlke statedthatitwasnottheplanatthistimetoclose Station No. 1, butitmaybe
apossibilityafterthefull-time dutycrewisimplemented. Hedidnotbelieveit wouldbenecessary
forthedepartment tostaff fourstationsinthefuture.
MayorGrantthankedFire ChiefBoehlke forattending themeeting thisevening.
A.TCAAPInfrastructure
PublicWorksDirectorMaurer explainedthatJonHornandBethKunkelofKimley-Horn and
PamMassaro ofWenck werepresenttodiscusstheInfrastructure Study withtheCouncil.
Mayor Grant discussedthestormwater treatment areathat wouldbenecessaryontheTCAAP
site. He requested thatthisareanotbedeemedas arecreational facility, butrather arequired
watertreatmentarea. He explainedthat theCouncil wanted toseethisspaceturned intoan
amenity onthesite.
PublicWorks Director Maurer reported thatthestormwater treatment component isafunction
ofthe landandiftheCity wantsto dressthisareaup, putin atrail orbenches, the expensesfor
these amenities wouldhavetobeassumedbytheCity.
BethEngum Ramsey County, clarified thattheregionaltreatment of stormwater onthesite
would benefitboththeCityand theCounty. Sheexplained thattheregional approach hassome
development andmaintenance advantages as comparedtonumerous smallerstormwater holding
ponds.
JonHorn Kimley-Horn, reviewedthedrainagesystem indetail withtheCouncilalongwithhow
theTCAAP sitewasbeingevaluated.
BethKunkel Kimley-Horn, discussed thelocationof thestormwater feature andtheareabeing
usedfor thewetlandmitigationarea. Shecommented thatthekeywouldbefortheCitytostrikea
balance between thestormwater requirements fromRiceCreek WatershedDistrictandtheDNR.
Inaddition, thecurrentwetlandsandimpervious surfaces wouldhave to bereviewed. Through all
ofthisanalysis, thegoalsof theCounty would have tobetakenintoconsideration. Sheexplained
that thisprocess wouldassiststaff increatingthefinal designfortheTCAAP sitewiththe
understanding thatallwater resourceswerebeingaddressed.
Councilmember Holden asked if thestormwater andgroundwater wastheCity’s responsibility.
Shethenreferred toconversations heldattherecentJDAmeetingregarding stormwater.
ARDEN HILLSSPECIAL CITYCOUNCIL WORKSESSION – JULY14, 2014 4
PublicWorksDirectorMaurer indicated thathewas theCity’srepresentativefortheTCAAP
infrastructurestudyandcommented thattheCitywaspayingforaportionofthestudy (sanitary
sewer, water andstormdrainage). Hereported thattheArmywasresponsibleforgroundwater
andthe Countywas responsible forwetlands. He indicatedthattheCitywould beinvolved inthe
designofthestormwater system andwouldhavemaintenance responsibilities after thesystem was
constructed.
Mr. Horn reported thathisgoal wastodesign astormwater systemthatmeetstheneeds ofthe
development area. Once therequirements areunderstood andthedesigniscreated, thenext step
wouldbetocreate afeasibility report. Thenthe expenseandcostsharing fortheprojectwould
need tobefurtherevaluated.
Mayor Grant asked ifthesizeofthestormwaterfacility wasdriven bytheamountof impervious
surfacethatwouldbecreated bydevelopment.
Mr. Horn statedthatexisting andproposed conditions impacted thesizeofastormwater facility
along withwhatwasnecessary tobridgethegap.
Councilmember Holden discussedthestormwaterditchthatrunsadjacentto thespineroad. She
askediftherewasacostdifferencebetweenafull-lengthditchversusponds.
Mr. Horn explained thatpondswouldrequire excavation andtheditches wouldrequire pipes.
Further discussion ensued regarding ditches versuspondsalong thespineroad.
Ms. Engum commented thattheCouncilwouldneedtoconsider ifthepondswouldhavewater
standinginthematalltimes, andifthiswater needed tobecirculatedor treatedtomaintain a
properlevelofwater quality.
CouncilmemberMcClung askedifthemajorityofthestormwater fromtheTCAAP sitewould
drainthrough thegreen spinetoRiceCreek.
Ms. Kunkel discussed howwatercurrentlyflowedthroughthesite notingthemajority would flow
toRiceCreek.
MayorGrant recommended thattheCouncildiscuss whatthey wouldliketoseeontheTCAAP
site. Henotedthatbasedoncommentsexpressed todate, theCouncil wants water intheponds at
alltimes andthat thepondsbe freeof algaeor stagnant water. Hefeltthatthestormwater
treatment pondswouldbeconsideredanamenity.
Councilmember McClung statedthathisidealvision wassimilarto thatofCentennialLakes. He
understood thattheCitymaynot beabletocreate something tothesameextent, but hoped to
havethree orfour larger bodiesofwater thatwere connected through ameanderingbrookthat
flowedintotheRiceCreek system. Thiswouldturnthestormwater treatmentsystem intoan
amenityrather thana system ofditches. Hewanted thisdevelopmentto bedifferentiatedfrom
othersites.
ARDEN HILLSSPECIAL CITYCOUNCIL WORKSESSION – JULY14, 2014 5
MayorGrant wanted toseesomedegree ofmanicureinsomeplaces, aswasseeninCentralPark
inRoseville. Hebelieved thatthiswouldenhance thevalue oftheproperty, whichwasinthejoint
interest ofboththeCountyandtheCity.
Public WorksDirector Maurer discussed thedifferent edgesavailable forstormwater ponds.
Councilmember Holmes anticipated thattheCitywashopingthattheCountywould contribute to
thestormwater ponding andmanicured edges asthis would greatlyenhancethesite andproperty
values. Sheexpressedfrustrationwith thelackofcommunicationbetween the CityandCounty
regarding thismatter.
MayorGrant agreed withthiscommentstatingthatageneral concept forthe stormwater ponds
wouldgreatlyassist Kimley-Hornindesigning thesite.
Ms. Engum believed thatsheand PublicWorksDirector Maurerwereonthesamepage. She
understood thattheCountyhadresponsibilities asthelandowner.
Public WorksDirectorMaurer discussed thebenefitsofaddressingthestormwatermanagement
fromaregional perspective. Henoted thattheregionalmanagement wouldenhancethevalueof
thepropertyandwouldreducethe numberof pondsonthe site andwouldtherefore reduce the
long-termmaintenanceexpenses.
Councilmember Holmes askedwhowouldbefinanciallyresponsible forthewatertreatment,
trails, benchesandedgesofthestormwater ponds.
PublicWorksDirector Maurer understoodthatthiswould beajointresponsibility. Heindicated
thatfurtherdiscussions wouldhavetobeheldbetweentheCityandtheCounty.
CouncilmemberHolden clarifiedthattheregional ponds would neverbeownedbytheprivate
landowners, butratherwouldbemaintained bytheCitygoing forward.
Public WorksDirectorMaurer stated thatthiswasthecaseandthatthepondswouldbecome a
partofthepublicinfrastructure.
Mr. Horn indicatedthathis goalthroughtheinfrastructurestudy wastocreatespace to
accommodatethestormwater fromthe entiresitein thegreenspinearea. Optionswouldbe
evaluated, along withthecost andthisinformationwould bepresentedtothe Council inOctober.
Itwashishope thattheareas wouldbenefitandenhance thesiteforboththeCityandtheCounty.
Mayor Grant discussedthepercentageof landthat wassetaside fortreatingthestormwater in
additiontothecurrent wetlands. He questioned ifKimley-Hornneeded tohaveabetter
understanding ofthe proposed densityforthesitebeforetheinfrastructure studycouldbe
completed.
Mr. Horn describedthe processhewould usewhen evaluating theinfrastructure forthegreen
spinebased on theapprovedMaster Plan. Heappreciated thevision anddirection provided bythe
Council thisevening.
AGENDA ITEM – 1B
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session Meeting for November 10, 2014
P:\Planning\Recycling & Garbage\2014\RFP_Recycling Services\CC WS Packet_(11-10-14)
Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 10, 2014
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Patrick Klaers, City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner
SUBJECT: Recycling RFP Discussion
Requested Action
Review and provide feedback regarding the RFP for Comprehensive Recycling Services.
Background
On October 30, 2014, the City received a letter from the Dorsey & Whitney Law Firm
representing Garbage Haulers for Citizen Choice (GHCC). The letter received from Dorsey &
Whitney is in regard to the recent RFP for Comprehensive Recycling Services.
City Attorney Joel Jamnik will be attending the meeting to review this item and answer any
questions the Council may have.
Attachments
A. Letter from Dorsey & Whitney