Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-30-15-R
Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons Update Kimley-Horn has completed the first part of the Fit Test. The results will be presented to the City Council at a special work session at 5:30 pm on Monday, March 30, 2015. The second part of the Fit Test is tentatively scheduled to be presented to the City Council at a special work session on Monday, April 13. The Energy Integration Resiliency Framework (EIRF) will be presented to the Joint Development Authority at their meeting on Monday, April 6, 2015. Ramsey County’s January/February 2015 development update is attached. STAFF COMMENTS MEMORANDUM Project Update: January/February 2015 Construction update Work is progressing quickly on the Rice Creek Commons site. Demolition of Building 502 – the last of the 44 buildings onsite when Ramsey County purchased the parcel – is nearly complete. The first stage of hazardous soil removal is 90% complete. Crews will remove the remaining non-hazardous soil underneath Building 502 in the next two months. We anticipate that environmental remediation will be completed by the beginning of summer. Infrastructure improvement project update Ramsey County is in the process of updating the highway and freeway connections surrounding Rice Creek Commons to provide adequate and safe access to the site. Work will begin on the I-35W/Highway 96 interchange project in the spring. The project will include constructing a diverging diamond interchange, a new type of interchange which improves traffic safety and mobility. (Here is a video simulation of this interchange.) This fall work will begin on the Rice Creek re-meander project near County Road H, and in 2016 work will be completed on the spine road and I-35W/County Road H interchange. Development update In February we launched a new website (RiceCreekCommons.com) to provide information about Rice Creek Commons and to promote development on the site. The new website provides all of the due diligence information that developers have requested and will ensure that we maintain our commitment to transparency and information sharing. We have received strong interest from major residential and commercial developers in the Twin Cities, as well as some national developers. The Joint Development Authority plans to issue an RFP for residential development in mid-2015. Additionally, the JDA is working with the Saint Paul Port Authority to issue a solicitation for commercial development in mid-2015. Energy resiliency update The Energy Resiliency Advisory Board (ERAB) is working with Ever-Green Energy and their team of energy systems and planning experts to develop a long-term energy vision for the site and framework to accomplish the vision. In November, the team finalized an Energy Integration Resiliency Framework Policy white paper, which provides a unifying vision for the site’s energy future and identifies the most beneficial opportunities for energy efficiency and efficient energy supply options. The executive summary and the full white paper are available on the Rice Creek Commons website. The team is now in the process of developing an energy resiliency framework with more details about how the Joint Development Authority can technically achieve the vision and recommendations put forth in the white paper. This framework will be completed in March. STEAM update On February 11 and 12, members of the Rice Creek Commons project team served as subject matter experts at Chippewa Middle School for a seventh-grade STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math) design project. During the two days, 360 students were divided into teams of eight and tasked with designing one of the three Rice Creek Commons neighborhoods. Students worked with our project team experts to inform the legal, finance, natural resources, construction and infrastructure components of their plan. They worked under a series of constraints with the overall driving question of, “How do you plan and design a sustainable community for the future?” A special thanks to Jonathan Weinhagen (SPACC), Mark Ruff (Ehlers), Shanna Schmitt (MPCA), Ryan Streff (Arden Hills), Beth Engum, Mike Goodnature, Scott Yonke, Joe Lux and Al Rupnow, and Heather Worthington (Ramsey County) who served as subject matter experts. We look forward to continuing our partnership with the Mounds View School District this spring. Approved: March 30, 2015 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CLOSED CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2015 5:00 PM - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the special closed City Council meeting at 5:05 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Dave McClung, and Robert Woodburn Absent: Councilmember Fran Holmes (excused) Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sue Iverson; Assistant City Engineer John Anderson; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust’s Appointed Attorney John Baker (Greene Espel); and Janine Kimble (Greene Espel) 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Council accepted the agenda as presented. 2. AGENDA ITEMS A. TAT Properties Ltd and 1201 East County Road E vs. City of Arden Hills The City Council and staff received a briefing from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust appointed Attorney, John Baker, regarding the claim which is a challenge to the PUD amendment denial. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the special closed City Council meeting at 6:10 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Patrick Klaers David Grant City Administrator Mayor Approved: March 30, 2015 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 17, 2015 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE 5:00 PM SPECIAL CLOSED CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council work session at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes (via telephone), Dave McClung, and Robert Woodburn Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; and JDA Attorney Mike Norton 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Introduction of Republic Services City Planner Streff stated that the current residential recycling services contract with Eureka Recycling expires on May 3, 2015. As a result of the approaching contract conclusion, a Request for Proposals (RFP) for residential recycling services was released by the City. Five companies, including Eureka Recycling, Republic Services, Tennis Sanitation, Walters Recycling, and Waste Management, submitted proposals. City Planner Streff explained that each proposal was carefully evaluated by the review team based on the criteria outlined in the RFP. The final analysis indicated that Republic Services had the best price for the services requested, relative to the recycling needs of the City and its residents. After the team’s review, it was found that in order to maintain the equivalent amount of current services to City residents a recommendation would be made to the Council that included a five (5) year contract with Republic Services with weekly service and City-owned carts. City Planner Streff commented that Republic Services has been providing recycling and solid waste services in the Twin Cities area since 1948. Formerly known as BFI Waste Services and Allied Waste, Republic Services is the largest trash and recycling services company in North ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 17, 2015 2 America. They are a Fortune 500© organization and in 2006, 2007, and 2008 were named by Forbes Magazine as one of the “Most Trustworthy Companies” in the United States. Republic Services currently has approximately 150,000 residential customers and 12,000 commercial customers in the greater Twin Cities area. They provide contracted solid waste and recycling services for about 20 communities in the metro area, including the cities of New Brighton and Shoreview. City Planner Streff indicated that staff has negotiated the final draft of the contract with Republic Services for residential recycling services, and plans to have a contract prepared for the Council’s consideration at the City Council meeting on February 23, 2015. A few highlights of the draft contract are provided below. The Contractor shall be responsible and pay for all aspects of cart management and operations, including: receiving, assembly, distribution (aka new cart “roll out”), excess cart inventory, (i.e., provide “warehouse” services), cart switches/replacements, cart maintenance, repair or replacement of damaged carts, and manage all aspects of warranty repairs. The Contractor shall provide recycling and solid waste collection services at the City owned and operated buildings and parks at no additional cost to the City. The Contractor and the City shall work together in the preparation and distribution of educational materials to insure accurate information and program directions. The Contractor shall pay for the annual design, printing and mailing of a curbside program flyer The Contractor shall conduct its own promotions and public education to increase participation. The publicity and promotion program may include articles for city newsletters, public appearances, provision of information for local environmental groups, or attendance at public events sponsored by the City. The Contractor shall at a minimum provide one (1) newsletter article per year. Recyclables Collection shall be $3.03 per eligible residential dwelling unit per month for weekly recycling service with an annual CPI of up to three (3) percent. Eligible residential dwelling units with more than one (1) cart will be charged an additional fee of $2.00 per household per month per cart. Recyclables Collection shall be $55.00 per eligible multi-dwelling unit per month for each four yard container serviced once per week or $4.25 per eligible multi-dwelling unit per month for each 65 gallon cart serviced once per week. The processing fee for all recyclable material commodities shall be $66.00 per ton with an annual CPI of up to three (3) percent. The Revenue Share on all commodities shall be split between the City and the Contractor at a rate of 80% for the City and 20% to the Contractor. City Planner Streff stated that staff has applied for a Public Entity Innovation Grant (PEIG) through Ramsey County for residential recycling carts. At this time, the County is still in the process of reviewing the City’s grant application. PEIG grants are typically awarded up to $100,000 for the purchase of recycling carts. However, the City is applying for $125,000 to cover the entire cost for the transition to recycling carts. If the City receives a PEIG in the amount $100,000 for the purchase of recycling carts, the City would then need to use the reserves within ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 17, 2015 3 the recycling fund or raise the current rate for recycling services to cover this additional expense. The recycling fund currently has approximately $80,000 in reserves. Mayor Grant requested further information regarding the new rates for service and the revenue sharing with Republic Services. City Planner Streff reviewed the rate and revenue sharing information with the Council for years one through five. It was estimated that the City would receive an average of $14,000 in revenue sharing on an annual basis. Councilmember Holden questioned how many residents would be requesting a second cart. City Planner Streff anticipated that this would be a very small number given the fact that recycling pick up would be done on a weekly basis. Doug Link, Republic Services, discussed how recycling participation has increased over the past several years, in particular with single-sort recycling programs. Councilmember McClung wanted to be assured that residents would be encouraged to participate in the City’s recycling program. He asked how Republic Services would be educating the public. Mr. Link stated that Republic Services will be sending a letter to all residents, and a hanger will be hung on the recycling carts. In addition, information will be available on the Republic Services website. He then reviewed the items that will be accepted. He explained that Republic Services has a residual rate of 7% of the 19,000 tons or recyclables processed each month. Mayor Grant asked if families could change their cart size, if their needs change. Mr. Link commented that this could be done to meet the needs of Arden Hills’ residents. He looked forward to providing service in the community as Republic Services already serves Shoreview and New Brighton. Councilmember Holden questioned how Republic would handle fluctuating prices on the recycled goods. Mr. Link indicated that Republic Services has national contracts for the recycled goods. He believed that Republic Services would not be coming back to the City to renegotiate the revenue sharing on the recyclables. Mayor Grant inquired if there would be a movement towards organics pickup. Mr. Link discussed the options for organics that were being considered for yard and food waste materials. He commented that Ramsey County was discussing how to better manage organics disposal. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 17, 2015 4 Councilmember Woodburn asked if the City has considered every other week pickup for recycling. Mr. Link commented that this could be accommodated if the City was interested in providing its residents with larger carts for bi-weekly pickup. Mayor Grant indicated that the current proposal was to provide residents with weekly recycling collection. Mr. Link thanked the Council for their feedback and stated that he looked forward to providing service to Arden Hills. B. TCAAP City Administrator Klaers explained that the final draft of the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC) was presented to the City Council at the workshop with Gateway Planning on February 2, 2015. Although the Community Development Director is not attending this work session, the City Planner and Associate Planner are available to respond to any questions or comments the Council may have on the final draft of the TRC. City Administrator Klaers indicated that special City Council work sessions have been scheduled for the evenings of February 24 and 25, 2015, for the Council to complete a comprehensive review of the TRC before considering tentative approval of the document. Staff is requesting that the Council provide direction on any topic areas where additional research is still needed prior to these upcoming meetings. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the proposed setbacks within the Town Center and Neighborhood Transition Zoning Districts. She suggested that this be reevaluated in order for the City to provide a proper transition between commercial and residential properties. Associate Planner Bachler provided comment on the Residential Transition Standards in place for the Town Center Zoning District. He explained that any new development in the Town Center District would be required to maintain a 10 foot setback when adjacent to the Neighborhood Transition or Neighborhood District. Mayor Grant commented that he still wanted to see further language included that would address building materials. He wanted to better understand the price points for the homes within TCAAP. He was interested in mason, board and baton, and low maintenance homes that would hold their value. Councilmember Holden indicated that she would rather see stucco homes than numerous vinyl sided homes within TCAAP. She wanted to see housing built for first time homeowners and requested that staff investigate if there would be single-family homes on 50 foot lots, other than townhomes. City Administrator Klaers commented that staff could look into this matter. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 17, 2015 5 Councilmember Holden asked if a “Park Plan” would be included as an appendix to the TRC. She noted her concern with pocket parks within senior developments. Associate Planner Bachler stated that the TRC does reference a TCAAP Master Parks and Open Space Plan within Section 9. Councilmember Holden recommended that a vision statement for the water feature be considered within the TRC. She thought that there was a void with regard to the water feature. She suggested that staff consider adding language to address this concern. Councilmember Woodburn stated that he understood that it was quite expensive to maintain water features. Councilmember Holmes suggested that staff speak with the City of Edina staff to see how they maintain Centennial Lakes. Councilmember Holden stated that she wanted to make sure that future road access into AHATS could be provided. Mayor Grant expressed concern that there were several long roadways with buildings/homes along only one side of the street. He noted that this would become an issue when the streets needed to be improved and assessed. JDA Attorney Norton reported that this was a challenging issue that the City should address prior to any TCAAP land being sold. Councilmember Woodburn recommended that the shared parking language be addressed by staff. He requested further information on zero lot lines within the Neighborhood District. Associate Planner Bachler discussed when and where zero lot lines would be permitted in the Neighborhood District. Councilmember Holden asked if the fit and market study would cover both residential and commercial properties. She was in favor of the study including commercial properties. City Administrator Klaers reported that he has only had one conversation with the County regarding the fit and market study. He believed that from the initial conversation, the study would concentrate on residential development. Councilmember McClung anticipated that after the fit study was complete, there would be fewer residential units than the Council was anticipating. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Mayor Grant stated that he had discussed the potential of a dog park at Freeway Park with Public Works Director Maurer. He requested the Council consider this and provide staff with feedback. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 17, 2015 6 Councilmember Holden recommended that the PTRC discuss this matter and make a determination on how successful the current dog park (Hazelnut Park) was before the Council considered another dog park. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council work session at 6:45 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Patrick Klaers David Grant City Administrator Mayor Approved: March 30, 2015 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 23, 2015 6:15 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Pro-Tem McClung called to order the special City Council work session at 6:15 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes (via telephone), Dave McClung, and Robert Woodburn Absent: Mayor David Grant (excused) Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; and City Clerk Amy Dietl 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. TCAAP Public Works Director Maurer reviewed an outline of the Public Works Design Manual referenced in the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC). He noted that most of the information envisioned for this manual exists at this time; however, it is not currently in a manual style format due to the minimal development within the City in recent years. Public Works Director Maurer stated that by compiling this information into a Public Works Design Manual, future developers of TCAAP can be given one document that provides all the information needed for the actual construction process. Additionally, having the TRC reference the Design Manual simplifies the process when information needs to be updated (i.e. updating the tree palette by changing the types of acceptable trees). He discussed the outline in further detail with the Council, noting how public utilities will be impacted and asked for comments or questions. Discussion ensued regarding property rights and right-of-ways. Councilmember Holmes asked if developers would be required to install curb and gutter. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 23, 2015 2 Public Works Director Maurer reported that the Code would require the installation of barrier style concrete curb and gutter. Councilmember Woodburn requested further information on how the TCAAP site would be graded and asked if additional soil could be brought in. Public Works Director Maurer explained how the site would be graded according to approved plans. He noted that up to 50 yards of soil can be brought in to individual lots without a grading permit. Mayor Pro-Tem McClung encouraged the Council to keep the TRC uniform with other zoning requirements throughout the City. Public Works Director Maurer explained that staff would continue to work on this document and would bring it back before the Council for further review and approval. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Public Works Director Maurer reported that he has been in conversation with Fourth Dimension regarding the gateway sign at Cleveland/County Road D. He noted that the sign would be removed and repainted Arden Hills tan and the logo color changed to green. In addition, staff received a proposal to change the brick, which would cost the City approximately $2,200. Mayor Pro-Tem McClung was ambivalent regarding this matter. Councilmember Holden stated that she missed the meeting at which this gateway sign was previously discussed. Public Works Director Maurer stated that he would ask Fourth Dimension for brick color samples and bring them to an upcoming work session for further consideration. City Administrator Klaers reviewed the proposed agenda for the February 24th special City Council work session agenda. ADJOURN Mayor Pro-Tem McClung adjourned the special City Council work session at 6:56 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Amy Dietl Dave McClung City Clerk Mayor Pro-Tem Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims & Payroll Requested Action: 1. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item – Claims and Payroll Supporting Documents: Payroll 2015 Payroll #6 ...................................................................................... $ 101,363.72 2015 Payroll #7 ...................................................................................... $ 82,035.57 Total Payroll $ 183,399.29 Accounts Payable Claims Through 03/27/2015 Paid Claims (Check No 0 US Bank EFT) .............................................. $ 37.00 Paid Claims (Check No 44478-Check No 44552) ................................. $ 286,282.73 Paid Claims (Check No 44553-Check No 44555) ................................. $ 310,864.07 Total Accounts Payable $ 597,183.80 Total Claims $ 780,583.09 CONSENT ITEM - 5A MEMORANDUM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 6 CHECKS DATED: 03/13/15 Biweekly: 02/21/15 - 03/06/15 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,587.23 EFT SIT 2,679.49 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,261.93 EFT FICA Medicare 996.73 EFT TOTAL TAXES 14,525.38 Health Premium 2,274.78 A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 275.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 370.83 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,920.61 HSA Health Saving 1,667.35 Health Care Savings Plan EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 345.39 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 275.70 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 2,288.44 PERA 4,147.57 EFT ICMA 5,012.06 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 342.85 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 10,116.88 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 132.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 1,215.71 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check* 5,143.73 1,926.87 1,926.87 4,785.65 358.08 14,394.99 1,240.81 15,635.80 CITY BENEFIT 4,261.93 996.73 5,258.66 PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check Life/Addl/Dep Life 124.45 A/P Check* Public Employee Long Term Care 93.72 A/P Check* UNUM 42.55 A/P Check* AFLAC 257.62 EFT Avesis-Vision Care 5.22 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,903.27 Total Employee Deductions 31,754.58 Net Payroll 372.87 Direct Deposit 41,722.06 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 73,676.62 STD/LTD Gross - Up 0.00 Plus City Paid Benefit 28,059.97 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 101,363.72 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 73,676.62 Less Total FSA 2,920.61 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 70,756.01 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20%4,261.93 FICA Medicare @ 1.45%996.73 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 94.91 94.91 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 7 CHECKS DATED: 03/27/15 Biweekly: 03/07/15 - 03/20/15 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,223.05 EFT SIT 2,564.79 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,071.65 EFT FICA Medicare 952.25 EFT TOTAL TAXES 13,811.74 Health Premium 2,274.78 A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 275.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 370.83 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,920.61 HSA Health Saving 1,667.35 Health Care Savings Plan EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 270.39 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 172.50 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 2,110.24 PERA 4,148.85 EFT ICMA 4,913.78 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 342.85 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 10,019.88 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 132.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 30.00 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check* CITY BENEFIT 4,071.65 952.25 5,023.90 1,005.28 85.06 1,090.34 166.67 166.67 4,787.14 358.08 5,145.22 PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check Life/Addl/Dep Life 124.45 A/P Check* Public Employee Long Term Care 93.72 A/P Check* UNUM 42.55 A/P Check* AFLAC 257.62 EFT Avesis-Vision Care 5.22 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 717.56 Total Employee Deductions 29,580.03 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 41,022.01 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 70,602.04 STD/LTD Gross - Up 0.00 Plus City Paid Benefit 11,433.53 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 82,035.57 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 70,602.04 Less Total FSA 2,920.61 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 67,681.43 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20%4,071.65 FICA Medicare @ 1.45%952.25 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 7.40 7.40 1 Ashley Bertrand From:MN Revenue e-Services [eservices.mdor@state.mn.us] Sent:Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:48 PM To:Ashley Bertrand Subject:Your Recent Return Request This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Sales and Use Tax - Return Submitted Thank you, your request has been submitted. Please allow 3 business days for your return to appear online. Please allow 3 business days from 20-Mar-2015 for your payment to appear online. You can change or cancel this request until 5:00 p.m. Central time. Confirmation Summary Submitted Date and Time: 12-Mar-2015 1:47:41 PM Legal Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Federal Employer ID: 41-6008992 User Who Submitted: Accounting Analyst Type of Request Submitted: Return for 2/28/2015 Account Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Minnesota ID: 9047998 Return Summary Return Confirmation Number: 1-256-895-872 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 28-Feb-2015 Projected Amount/Credit Due: $37.00 Payment Summary Payment Confirmation Number: 0-720-024-960 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 28-Feb-2015 Payment Amount: $37.00 Payment Type: Return Payment Date: 20-Mar-2015 Bank Name: US BANK NA Bank Account Number: ********9377 Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Sales and Use Tax Division at (Metro Area) 651-296-6181, (Greater Minnesota) 800-657- 3777, or (email) SalesUse.Tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going to the History Tab. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. Accounts Payable User: Printed: ashley.bertrand 3/27/2015 9:01 AM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0192 Grainger, Inc 03/12/2015ACH 9661408246 PW Parts PW Parts 5.02 9661823865 PW Parts PW Parts 134.88 139.90Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0285 Xcel Energy 03/12/2015ACH 446374656 January 2015 Utility Bill January 2015 Utility Bill 2,130.45 2,130.45Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0292 Oxygen Service Company, Inc.03/12/2015ACH 07853370 PW Parts PW Parts 189.84 189.84Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0323 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.03/12/2015ACH 69900 City Hall Access Card Repair City Hall Access Card Repair 156.00 156.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0323: 0382 ICMA Retirement Trust - 106944 03/12/2015ACH PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 401 310.34 PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employer Percent 401 358.08 668.42Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA Retirement Trust- #302482 03/12/2015ACH PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee Deduction 4,138.08 PR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 563.64 4,701.72Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0414 Quick Silver 03/12/2015ACH 6513145 Spring/Summer Rec Guide Delivery Spring/Summer Rec Guide Delivery 25.59 25.59Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0414: 1001 Sprint/Nextel Communications 03/12/2015ACH 196110738-021 Jan/Feb 2015 Cell Phone Bill Jan/Feb 2015 Cell Phone Bill 169.02 169.02Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1001: 1195 Eureka Recycling 03/12/2015ACH 14742 January 2015 Recycling Costs January 2015 Recycling Costs 7,991.88 14742 January 2015 Recycling Costs January 2015 Recycling Costs -614.79 7,377.09Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1195: 4447 Braun Intertec Corporation 03/12/2015ACH B019090 Round Lake Road Charges Round Lake Road Charges 70.00 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 70.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4447: 5025 Sara Grant 03/12/2015ACH 03092015-SG December 2014 Mileage December 2014-February 2015 Mileage and Expense Reimbursement 22.40 03092015-SG January 2015 Expense Reimbursement December 2014-February 2015 Mileage and Expense Reimbursement 20.88 03092015-SG Janaury-February 2015 Mileage December 2014-February 2015 Mileage and Expense Reimbursement 138.25 181.53Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5025: 0600 315800-NCPERS Minnesota 03/12/201544478 3158315 February 2015 Payroll Deductions February 2015 Payroll Deductions 64.00 64.00Total for Check Number 44478: UB*00111 Kevin & Jill Arens 03/12/201544479 Refund Check 91.05 91.05Total for Check Number 44479: 1183 Bauer Built Inc.03/12/201544480 180157163 PW Parts PW Parts 501.20 501.20Total for Check Number 44480: 0131 Beisswenger's How-To Store 03/12/201544481 555026 PW Parts PW Parts 10.09 555997 PW Parts PW Parts 45.46 557781 PW Parts PW Parts 68.06 123.61Total for Check Number 44481: CANON Canon Financial Services 03/12/201544482 14676843 March 2015 Copier Lease March 2015 Copier Lease 822.80 14676843 March 2015 Copier Lease March 2015 Copier Lease 145.20 968.00Total for Check Number 44482: 0319 City of Roseville 03/12/201544483 0219910 February 2015 IT Bill February 2015 IT Bill 3,206.83 0219937 February 2015 Phone Bill February 2015 Phone Bill 403.85 3,610.68Total for Check Number 44483: 1033 Comcast 03/12/201544484 44271-0215 February 2015 TV Services February 2015 TV Services 8.41 8.41Total for Check Number 44484: 4372 DLT Solutions, LLC 03/12/201544485 4413709 2015 Contract-Expires 03.28.15 2015 Contract-Expires 03.28.15 997.59 997.59Total for Check Number 44485: 0841 Ehlers & Associates, Inc.03/12/201544486 66811 January 2015 TCAAP Charges January 2015 TCAAP Charges 315.00 315.00Total for Check Number 44486: 6085 Element Materials Technology 03/12/201544487 ESP0089523IN 2015 PMP Charges 2015 PMP Charges 2,850.00 ESP0089524IN 2015 PMP Charges 2015 PMP Charges 3,450.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 6,300.00Total for Check Number 44487: UB*00110 Charles Fairchild 03/12/201544488 Refund Check 6.01 6.01Total for Check Number 44488: 5548 Finance & Commerce, Inc.03/12/201544489 742043743 2015 PMP Bid Publication 2015 PMP Bid Publication 119.74 119.74Total for Check Number 44489: 0376 FirstLab 03/12/201544490 FL00112748 2015 Dues & Testing Fees 2015 Dues & Testing Fees 250.00 FL00112748 2015 Dues & Testing Fees 2015 Dues & Testing Fees 178.00 428.00Total for Check Number 44490: 0176 Frattallone's Hardware, Inc.03/12/201544491 063639-A PW Parts PW Parts 2.99 2.99Total for Check Number 44491: UB*00115 Fry Properties LLC 03/12/201544492 Refund Check 26.65 26.65Total for Check Number 44492: GARD Garden & Associates, Inc 03/12/201544493 1334 2015 PMP Charges 2015 PMP Charges 150.00 150.00Total for Check Number 44493: 5069 General Repair Service 03/12/201544494 55878 LS#11 Pump Repair LS#11 Pump Repair 1,308.57 1,308.57Total for Check Number 44494: 6455 Happy Faces Entertainment 03/12/201544495 03092015-HFE Annual Egg Hunt Bunny Annual Egg Hunt Bunny 109.99 109.99Total for Check Number 44495: 0447 I.U.O.E Local 49 Benefit Fund-Insurance 03/12/201544496 03.15.2015 April 2015 PW Benefits April 2015 PW Benefits 1,200.00 03152015 April 2015 PW Benefits April 2015 PW Benefits 8,480.00 9,680.00Total for Check Number 44496: 0390 INT'L Union Operating Engineers-Union Dues03/12/201544497 02052015-INT February 2015 Union Dues February 2015 Union Dues 264.00 264.00Total for Check Number 44497: 8081 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 03/12/201544498 6470307 January 2015 TCAAP Charges January 2015 TCAAP Charges 1,750.00 1,750.00Total for Check Number 44498: LAZA Lazarus Enterprises 03/12/201544499 814 Office Supplies Office Supplies 8.50 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 8.50Total for Check Number 44499: 0222 League of Minnesota Cities 03/12/201544500 212793 Safety/Loss Control Workshop Safety/Loss Control Workshop 20.00 20.00Total for Check Number 44500: 5138 League of MN Cities Ins. Trust 03/12/201544501 48824 2015 Casualty Coverage 2015 Casualty Coverage 64,002.00 64,002.00Total for Check Number 44501: 0879 Lexington Floral, Inc.03/12/201544502 006466 PTRC Member Rec-DM PTRC Member Rec-DM 53.51 53.51Total for Check Number 44502: UB*00112 Dario Menanteau 03/12/201544503 Refund Check 126.21 126.21Total for Check Number 44503: 6252 Office Depot 03/12/201544504 1758801207 Office Supplies Office Supplies 93.80 93.80Total for Check Number 44504: 0155 Office of MN IT Services 03/12/201544505 W15010664 January 2015 Phone Bill January 2015 Phone Bill 716.33 716.33Total for Check Number 44505: 7025 On Site Sanitation 03/12/201544506 A-571217 Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit -91.00 A-572828 Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit 46.43 A-572832 Cummings Park Restroom Rental Cummings Park Restroom Rental 46.43 A-572833 Freeway Park Restroom Rental Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit 46.43 A-578426 Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit 52.00 A-578503 Cummings Park Restroom Rental Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit 52.00 A-578547 Freeway Park Restroom Rental Hazelnut Park Restroom Rental Credit 52.00 204.29Total for Check Number 44506: 8032 Pace Analytical Field Svc 03/12/201544507 12150086 January 2015 Water Test Fees January 2015 Water Test Fees 688.00 688.00Total for Check Number 44507: UB*00113 Susan Payne 03/12/201544508 Refund Check 62.21 62.21Total for Check Number 44508: 0003 PermitWorks 03/12/201544509 2015-0004 2015 Support Agreement 2015 Support Agreement 3,585.00 2015-0004 2015 Support Agreement 2015 Support Agreement 1,495.00 2015-0004 2015 Support Agreement 2015 Support Agreement 295.00 2015-0004 2015 Support Agreement 2015 Support Agreement 300.00 5,675.00Total for Check Number 44509: 1110 Pitney Bowes 03/12/201544510 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 02232015-PB January 2015 Postage January 2015 Postage 1,239.99 02232015-PB January 2015 Postage January 2015 Postage 597.53 1,837.52Total for Check Number 44510: 3100 Provident Life and Accident Ins Co 03/12/201544511 9672443-0215 February 2015 UNUM Payment February 2015 UNUM Payment 85.10 85.10Total for Check Number 44511: 0310 Ramsey Co. League Local Gov't 03/12/201544512 1432 2015 Membership Dues 2015 Membership Dues 460.00 460.00Total for Check Number 44512: 0811 Ramsey County 03/12/201544513 PUBW-014322 January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 5,367.90 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 16.40 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 8.20 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 64.98 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 31.02 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 8.20 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 1,016.80 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 66.45 PUBW-014339 January 2015 Parts/Services January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 16.40 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 199.81 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 132.57 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 822.16 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 776.31 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 72.37 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 362.47 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 231.50 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 49.85 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 234.82 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 138.33 PUBW-014349 January 2015 Fuel Purchase January 2015 Bulk Road Salt Purchase 186.63 9,803.17Total for Check Number 44513: UB*00114 Steven & Jo Ann Reed 03/12/201544514 Refund Check 96.78 96.78Total for Check Number 44514: 0282 Republic Services #899 03/12/201544515 0899-002627976 March 2015 Trash Service March 2015 Trash Service 304.01 0899-002627976 March 2015 Trash Service March 2015 Trash Service 622.50 926.51Total for Check Number 44515: 0751 Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.03/12/201544516 293952 January 2015 Sprint PW 12-0029-001-02 ExpensesJanuary 2015 Sprint PW 12-0029-001-02 Expenses 437.53 437.53Total for Check Number 44516: SRFC SRF Consulting Group, Inc.03/12/201544517 08722.00-2 PC 14-036 January 2015 Charges PC 14-036 January 2015 Charges 5,064.72 5,064.72Total for Check Number 44517: 1387 Standard Insurance Company 03/12/201544518 147490-0315 March 2015 Life/STD/LTD Insurance March 2015 Life/STD/LTD Insurance 1,529.22 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1,529.22Total for Check Number 44518: 0327 Staples Business Advantage 03/12/201544519 3256544921 Office Supplies Office Supplies 159.69 3256544922 Office Supplies 76.99 3257101688 Office Supplies Office Supplies 267.56 3257101689 Office Supplies Office Supplies 32.89 537.13Total for Check Number 44519: 0925 T-Mobile 03/12/201544520 03222015-TM February 2015 Tablet Charges February 2015 Tablet Charges 359.91 359.91Total for Check Number 44520: 0576 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 03/12/201544521 M21102 02/02 TCAAP Mtg CC Mtgs, EDA, JDA, and Plan Com Meetings 26.00 M21102 01/26 & 02/04 Planning Mtgs CC Mtgs, EDA, JDA, and Plan Com Meetings 578.25 M21102 01/20, 01/26, 02/02, 02/09 CC Mtgs CC Mtgs, EDA, JDA, and Plan Com Meetings 1,023.00 1,627.25Total for Check Number 44521: 1175 TNT Cleaning and Consulting, INC 03/12/201544522 270347 February 2015 Cleaning February 2015 Cleaning 845.00 845.00Total for Check Number 44522: 1161 Valley-Rich Co., Inc.03/12/201544523 21303 Watermain Repair Watermain Repair 4,252.93 4,252.93Total for Check Number 44523: 1363 Water Conservation Service, Inc. 03/12/201544524 5706 January 2015 Leak Locates January 2015 Leak Locates 531.63 531.63Total for Check Number 44524: 142,679.30Total for 3/12/2015: 4889 Community Footworks 03/17/2015ACH 03042015 March Foot Care Clinic 285.60 285.60Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 4987 August Lindberg 03/17/201544525 Linz to issue paper check for seasonal work Lindberg, incorrect bank 443.75 443.75Total for Check Number 44525: 729.35Total for 3/17/2015: 0220 Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 03/27/2015ACH ALR00486061 2015 State Elevator License 2015 State Elevator License 100.00 100.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0220: 0320 Health Partners 03/27/2015ACH 56899142 April 2015 Dental Insurance April 2015 Dental Insurance 1,325.87 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1,325.87Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0382 ICMA Retirement Trust - 106944 03/27/2015ACH PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employer Percent 401 358.08 PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 401 310.34 668.42Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA Retirement Trust- #302482 03/27/2015ACH PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee Percent 515.36 PR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.03.2015 ICMA Employee Deduction 4,088.08 4,603.44Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0750 Verizon Wireless 03/27/2015ACH 9741860984 Feb/Mar 2015 Cell Phone Charges Feb/Mar 2015 Cell Phone Charges 120.08 9742079084 Feb/Mar 2015 Cell Phone Charges Feb/Mar 2015 Cell Phone Charges 938.99 1,059.07Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 1041 Aaron Thelen 03/27/2015ACH 03262015-AT February 2015 Mileage Reimbursement February 2015 Mileage Reimbursement 56.00 56.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1041: 2249 Terry Maurer 03/27/2015ACH 03132015-TM Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 38.46 03132015-TM Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 40.98 03132015-TM Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement Feb/March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 6.90 86.34Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2249: 5585 Amy Dietl 03/27/2015ACH 03252015-AD March 2015 Expense Reimbursement March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 13.70 03252015-AD March 2015 Expense Reimbursement March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 2.13 03252015-AD March 2015 Expense Reimbursement March 2015 Expense Reimbursement 74.75 90.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5585: 5587 CES Imaging 03/27/2015ACH INV016267 February 2015 Plotter Rental Charges February 2015 Plotter Rental Charges 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 5658 Sherri Eisenbraun 03/27/2015ACH 03122015-SE January 2015 Mileage Reimbursement January 2015 Mileage Reimbursement 18.97 18.97Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5658: 6349 Mary Nosek 03/27/2015ACH 15-004 March 2015 AH Notes March 2015 AH Notes 140.00 140.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6349: 7501 Kelly & Lemmons, P.A.03/27/2015ACH 42205 February 2015 Prosecution February 2015 Prosecution 2,760.86 2,760.86Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: ALPI Allegra Print & Imaging 03/27/2015ACH 143418 Thelen/Perrault Business Cards Thelen/Perrault Business Cards 62.64 143418 Thelen/Perrault Business Cards Thelen/Perrault Business Cards 62.63 Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 125.27Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: JOHC Johnson Controls 03/27/2015ACH 1-18832362347 2015 Service Agreement 2015 Service Agreement 1,270.00 1,270.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: TOII Tokle Inspections, Inc 03/27/2015ACH 03012015-Tokle February 2015 Inspections February 2015 Inspections 1,566.40 1,566.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TOII: 2129 Elfering & Associates 03/27/2015ACH 2087 Feb 2015 PMP Charges Feb 2015 PMP Charges 49,587.50 2088 Feb 2015 PMP Charges Feb 2015 PMP Charges 28,810.00 78,397.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2129: 0600 315800-NCPERS Minnesota 03/27/201544526 3158415 March 2015 Payroll Deductions March 2015 Payroll Deductions 64.00 64.00Total for Check Number 44526: 7504 Clarice Auluck-Wilson 03/27/201544527 03092015-CAW 2015 Music Together Program-Johanna Shores 2015 Music Together Program-Johanna Shores 1,212.40 1,212.40Total for Check Number 44527: 6047 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc 03/27/201544528 15C5938-IN March 2015 Vision March 2015 Vision 10.86 10.86Total for Check Number 44528: CPF1 Central Pension Fund 03/27/201544529 02282015-CPF February 2015 Contributions February 2015 Contributions 1,228.80 1,228.80Total for Check Number 44529: 0319 City of Roseville 03/27/201544530 0219976 March 2015 IT Bill March 2015 IT Bill 3,206.83 02200006 March 2015 Phone Bill March 2015 Phone Bill 403.85 3,610.68Total for Check Number 44530: CWBL City of White Bear Lake 03/27/201544531 9700 Ramsey County 2015 GIS Fees Ramsey County 2015 GIS Fees 961.89 961.89Total for Check Number 44531: 6077 CIVICPLUS 03/27/201544532 153177 2015 Website Maintenance Charges 2015 Website Maintenance Charges 5,185.30 5,185.30Total for Check Number 44532: 8741 CW Houle, Inc.03/27/201544533 10167 Repair of Sanitary Sewer Manhole Repair of Sanitary Sewer Manhole 3,620.00 3,620.00Total for Check Number 44533: 0522 Siobhan Ehle 03/27/201544534 03252015-SE Robotic Builders Class Refund Robotic Builders Class Refund 57.00 Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 57.00Total for Check Number 44534: 4470 GLTC Premium Payments 03/27/201544535 1506872 March 2015 Long Term Care March 2015 Long Term Care 187.44 187.44Total for Check Number 44535: HEPC Hewlett Packard Company 03/27/201544536 55561083 Technology Supplies-Recreation Technology Supplies-Recreation 380.00 380.00Total for Check Number 44536: 8050 International Institute of Municipal Clerks 03/27/201544537 25093-2015 2015 Membership Fee-Dietl 2015 Membership Fee-Dietl 95.00 95.00Total for Check Number 44537: 4354 Paula Johnson 03/27/201544538 03262015-PJ AARP Refund AARP Refund 19.00 19.00Total for Check Number 44538: 0217 Laden's Business Machines, Inc.03/27/201544539 7588 Check Signing Machine Services Check Signing Machine Services 277.50 7588 Check Signing Machine Services Check Signing Machine Services 11.50 289.00Total for Check Number 44539: 0916 Lakes Country Service Coop 03/27/201544540 CI073HA9-0315 April 2015 Health Insurance April 2015 Health Insurance 4,315.00 CI073HB7-0315 April 2015 Health Insurance April 2015 Health Insurance 5,553.00 CI073HE1-0315 April 2015 Health Insurance April 2015 Health Insurance 1,135.50 11,003.50Total for Check Number 44540: 0240 Metropolitan Area Mgmt. Assn.03/27/201544541 1702 2015 Membership Dues 2015 Membership Dues 45.00 1794 3/13/15 Meeting 3/13/15 Meeting 20.00 65.00Total for Check Number 44541: 0257 Minnesota Dept. of Health 03/27/201544542 02112015-MDH Q1 2015 Water Connection Service Fee Q1 2015 Water Connection Service Fee 4,145.00 4,145.00Total for Check Number 44542: 8029 MMKR & Co, PA 03/27/201544543 36901 2014 Audit 2014 Audit 352.00 36901 2014 Audit 2014 Audit 352.00 36901 2014 Audit 2014 Audit 352.00 36901 2014 Audit 2014 Audit 352.00 36901 2014 Audit 2014 Audit 352.00 1,760.00Total for Check Number 44543: 0147 Moundsview Public Schools 03/27/201544544 5727 Island Lakes Room Rental Island Lakes Room Rental 81.00 5729 Valentine Hills Room Rental Valentine Hills Room Rental 71.25 5753 Valentine Hills Room Rental Valentine Hills Room Rental 92.88 5754 Valentine Hills Room Rental Valentine Hills Room Rental 29.70 Page 9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 274.83Total for Check Number 44544: 1110 Pitney Bowes 03/27/201544545 03232015-PB February 2015 Postage February 2015 Postage 597.69 03232015-PB February 2015 Postage February 2015 Postage 19.99 03232015-PB February 2015 Postage February 2015 Postage 593.95 1,211.63Total for Check Number 44545: 1208 Premium Waters, Inc 03/27/201544546 610207-02-15 February 2015 City Hall Supplies February 2015 City Hall Supplies 4.55 613317-02-15 February 2015 City Hall Supplies February 2015 City Hall Supplies 199.36 203.91Total for Check Number 44546: 0811 Ramsey County 03/27/201544547 EMCOM-003907 February 2015 CAD Services February 2015 CAD Services 895.50 EMCOM-003922 February 2015 911 Dispatch February 2015 911 Dispatch 4,798.50 EMCOM-003932 February 2015 Fleet Support Fee February 2015 Fleet Support Fee 24.96 PRRLG-001321 Q1 2015 Electron Contract Payment Q1 2015 Electron Contract Payment 4,682.00 10,400.96Total for Check Number 44547: 4464 Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce 03/27/201544548 2486871 Business Retention/Expansion Services Business Retention/Expansion Services 1,250.00 1,250.00Total for Check Number 44548: SRFC SRF Consulting Group, Inc.03/27/201544549 08722.00-3 Feb 2015 PC 14-036 Escrow Charges Feb 2015 PC 14-036 Escrow Charges 757.35 757.35Total for Check Number 44549: 1387 Standard Insurance Company 03/27/201544550 147490-0415 April 2015 STD/LTD/Life Insurance April 2015 STD/LTD/Life Insurance 1,656.84 1,656.84Total for Check Number 44550: 0327 Staples Business Advantage 03/27/201544551 3244314029 Office Supplies Office Supplies -22.27 3253321841 Office Supplies Office Supplies 208.70 3253321845 Office Supplies Office Supplies 112.94 3257684230 Office Supplies Office Supplies 218.93 3258164118 Office Supplies Office Supplies 399.63 3259183883 Office Supplies Office Supplies -221.96 695.97Total for Check Number 44551: 0576 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 03/27/201544552 M21132 02/17/15 CC Mtg 02/17/15 CC Mtg 199.00 199.00Total for Check Number 44552: 8081 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 03/27/201544553 6546187 February 2015 TCAAP Charges February 2015 TCAAP Charges 22,720.50 22,720.50Total for Check Number 44553: 0811 Ramsey County 03/27/201544554 PRMG-002778 Q2 2015 Rent Q2 2015 Rent 24,654.25 SHRFL-001386 March 2015 RC Sheriff March 2015 RC Sheriff 90,489.32 Page 10AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 115,143.57Total for Check Number 44554: 0319 City of Roseville 03/27/201544555 0220070 Q4 2014 Water Bill Supplement Q4 2014 Water Bill Supplement 173,000.00 173,000.00Total for Check Number 44555: 453,738.15Total for 3/27/2015: Report Total (106 checks): 597,146.80 Page 11AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/27/2015 9:01 AM) CONSENT ITEM – 5B MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator SUBJECT: NSCC Joint and Cooperative Agreement Introduction/Background Last summer the North Suburban Communications Commission (NSCC) starting working on revising the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). This work was necessary in part because the JPA was outdated as it had not been updated in over 20 years and, in part due to the pending withdrawl of the City of Shoreview from the 10-city JPA. At the February 5, 2015, meeting of the NSCC, the commissioners voted to recommend that the member cities approve the revised JPA. A cover memo from Cor Wilson, NSCC Executive Director, a redlined version of the JPA, and a final version of the JPA are attached. Michael Bradley, NSCC legal counsel from Bradley Hagen & Gullilson will be at the City Council meeting to answer question. Also, Arden Hills NSCC Commissioner, Craig Wilson, has been invited to the Council meeting. Requested Action It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 2015-027, a resolution approving the Amended North Suburban Communications Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of the Cable Communications Franchise. Attachments Attachment A: Memo from Cor Wilson Attachment B: Redline Version of JPA Attachment C: Final Version of JPA Attachment D: Resolution 2015-027 March 18, 2015 to: Pat Klaers, City Administrator City of Arden Hills from: Cor Wilson Executive Director subject: Revisions to Joint Powers Agreement We began revising the Joint Powers Agreement last summer, working with the city managers and administrators and the NSCC/NSAC Strategic Planning Committee. Since the Joint Powers Agreement had last been updated in 1990, most of the 2014/2015 revisions to the document reflected our current practice. In addition, the Strategic Planning Committee clarified some of the language and made sure it was consistent throughout. Finally, some of the changes reflected our experience with the withdrawal of the City of Shoreview from the NSCC. I. General Updates – These include the name change and combining the secretary and treasurer officers into one position. The purpose and duties of the NSCC were updated and clarified in Articles II and VIII. For example, the NSCC does not monitor the cable system so much as it administers the cable franchises of the member cities. The specific reference to rate regulation was changed to a broader concern with consumer protection. With the withdrawal of the City of Shoreview, references to the city were removed and the number of members updated. Article VII still reflected language from the original Joint Powers Agreement adopted in 1983, so that was removed. Article X, Section 4, reflects current practice. II. Language consistency and clarity – We changed all references to “Board” to “Commission” in order to be consistent. Article X, Section 3, clarified the current practice and eliminated excess verbiage. III. Change reflecting experience with Shoreview’s withdrawal Article VIII, Section 11, makes clear that a withdrawing city will assume all responsibility for its own Public, Education and Government access channels and removed a reference to the 1990 document which transferred responsibility for the PEG channels from the cable company to the NSCC. Because the current withdrawal schedule made budgeting difficult, Article X changes the notification date for withdrawal from October 15 to July 1 and changes the date by which a the withdrawing city may rescind its notice from December 31 to October 15. In addition to again clarifying that the withdrawing city is responsible for its own PEG channels, we also deleted language that required the NSCC to distribute a pro rata share of any PEG channel funding to the withdrawing city. Instead, the cable operator must pay its obligated PEG channel funding for the withdrawing city directly to that city. Feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions about the revisions. Arden Hills Falcon Heights Lauderdale Little Canada Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks Roseville St. Anthony No r t h S u b u r b a n C o m m u n i c a t i o n s C o m m i s s i o n No r t h S u b u r b a n A c c e s s C o r p o r a t i o n 26 7 0 A r t h u r S t r e e t Ro s e v i l l e , M N 5 5 1 1 3 Ph o n e : ( N S C C ) 6 5 1 - 7 9 2 - 7 5 0 0 ( C T V ) 6 5 1 - 7 9 2 - 7 5 1 5 ( F a x ) 6 5 1 - 7 9 2 - 7 5 0 1 w w w . c t v n o r t h s u b u r b s . o r g 1 2015 Final – Redline Version Revised June, 1990 2015 AMENDED NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMFRANCHISE I. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the state of Minnesota. This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota statutes Section 471.59, as amended. II. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this Agreement is to establish an organization to monitor the operation and activities of cable communications, and in particular, the Cable Communication System (system) of the parties; to provide coordination of administration to administer and enforcement of the respective cable franchises of the parties; for their respective system; to administer the procedure for the renewal of the existing cable franchises and the procedure for the award of new cable franchises; to promote, coordinate, administer and develop community PEG access cable television channels and programming; and to conduct such other activities authorized herein as may be necessary to insure equitable and reasonable rates and service levels for the citizens establish and enforce consumer protection standards for cable subscribers of the members of the organization. III. NAME The name of the organization is the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission (NSCC). IV. DEFINITION OF TERMS Section 1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this Article shall have the meanings given to them. Section 2. “Commission” means the Board of Directors created pursuant to this Agreement. 2 2015 Final – Redline Version Section 3. "Council" means the governing body of a member. Section 4. “Franchise” means that cable communications franchise granted by all cities listed in Article V, section 1. Section 5. “Grantee” means the any person or entity to whom a franchise has been granted by a member. Section 6. "Member" means a municipality which enters into this Agreement. Section 7. “System” means that cable communications system more specifically defined in the Franchise Ordinance of the Member. V. MEMBERSHIP Section 1. The municipalities of Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Lauderdale, Moundsview, New Brighton, North Oaks, Roseville, and St. Anthony., and Shoreview are eligible to be the Members of the Commission. Any municipality geographically contiguous to any of these named municipalities and served by a cable communications system through the same Grantee may become a Member pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Section 2. Any municipality desiring to become a Member shall execute a copy of this Agreement and conform to all requirements herein. Section 3. The initial Members shall be those municipalities listed in sSection 1 of this Article V. Section 4. Municipalities desiring to become Members after the date specified in Article V, Section 3, may be admitted by an affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of the Members of the commission, with at least five (5) Members voting in the affirmative. The Commission may, by resolution, impose conditions upon the admission of additional members. VI. DIRECTORS; VOTING Section 1. Each Member shall be entitled to one (1) director to represent it on the Commission. Each director is entitled to vote in direct proportion to the percent of annual revenues attributable to the municipality represented by the director to the total annual revenues of the system for the prior year rounded to the nearest whole number, provided, however, that each director shall have at least one vote. For the purposes of this section, the annual revenues for each Member and the total annual system revenues as of December 31 of each year shall be 3 2015 Final – Redline Version determined by the records of the cable operator filed with the commission with the annual franchise fee. Prior to the first commission meeting in March of each year, the Secretary/Treasurer of the commission shall determine the number of votes for each Member in accordance with this section and certify the results to the Chair. Section 2. A director shall be appointed by resolution of the Council of each Member. A director shall serve until a successor is appointed. and qualified. Directors shall serve without compensation from the Commission. Section 3. Each Member shall may appoint at least one an alternate director or directors. The Commission, in its By-Laws, may prescribe the extent of an alternate's powers and duties. Section 4. A vacancy in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 351.02 or upon a revocation of a director's appointment duly filed by a Member with the commission. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term of director by the Council of the Member whose position on the Board Commission is vacant. Section 5. There shall be no voting by proxy, but all votes must be cast by the director or the duly authorized alternate at a Commission meeting. Section 6. The presence of five directors representing a majority of the total authorized votes of all directors shall constitute a quorum, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Section 7. A director shall not be eligible to vote on behalf of the director's municipality during the time said municipality is in default on any contribution or payment to the commission. During the existence of such default, the vote or votes of such Member shall not be counted for the purposes of this Agreement. Section 8. All official actions of the commission must receive two-thirds (2/3) of all authorized votes cast on that issue at a duly constituted meeting of the Commission and the affirmative vote of five directors. Abstentions shall not be considered authorized votes cast. VII. EFFECTIVE DATE; MEETINGS; ELECTION OF OFFICERS Section 1. A municipality may enter into this Agreement by resolution of its council and the duly authorized execution of a copy of this Agreement by its proper officers. Thereupon, the 4 2015 Final – Redline Version clerk or other appropriate officer of the municipality shall file a duly executed copy of this Agreement, together with a certified copy of the authorizing resolution, with the Commission. Office of the NSCC. The resolution authorizing the execution of the Agreement shall also designate the director and the alternate for the municipality on the Commission, along with said director's and alternate's address, and home and work phone numbers. Section 2. This Agreement and any amendments thereto are effective on the date when executed agreements and authorizing resolutions of five of the municipalities all of the members named in Article V, Section 1, have been filed as provided in this Article. Section 3. Officers of the commission shall be elected annually for one-year terms. Officers shall be limited to two consecutive terms in a given office. [NOTE: Moved to Art. IX, Section 1.] VIII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION Section 1. The powers and duties of the Commission shall include the powers set forth in this Article. Section 2. The Commission may make such contracts, grants, and take such other action as it deems necessary and appropriate to accomplish the general purposes of the organization. The Commission may not contract for the purchase of real estate without the prior authorization of the member municipalities. Any purchases or contracts made shall conform to the requirements applicable to Minnesota statutory cities. Section 3. The commission shall assume all authority and undertake all tasks necessary to coordinate, administer, and enforce the Franchise of each Member except for that authority and those tasks specifically retained by a Member. Section 4. The Commission shall continually review the operation and performance of the cable communications system of the Members and prepare and submit annual reports to the Members. Section 5. The Commission shall undertake all procedures necessary to maintain uniform rates and to handle applications for changes in rates for the services provided by the Grantee. Section 64. The Commission may provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in actions or proceedings at law in which it may have an interest, and may employ counsel for that purpose. It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its powers and duties. Such employees may be on a full time, part-time or consulting basis, as the 5 2015 Final – Redline Version Commission determines, and the Commission may make any required employer contributions which local governmental units are authorized or required to make by law. Section 75. The Commission may conduct such research and investigation and take such action as it deems necessary including participation and appearance in proceedings of State and Federal regulatory, legislative or administrative bodies, or on any matter related to or affecting cable communication rates franchises., or levels of service. Section 86. The Commission may obtain from Grantee and from any other source such information relating to rates, costs and service levels the cable communications franchises as any member is entitled to obtain from Grantee or others. Section 97. The Commission may accept gifts, apply for and use grants, enter into agreements required in connection therewith and hold, use and dispose of money or property received as a gift or grant in accordance with the terms thereof. Section 108. The Commission shall make an annual, independent audit of the books of the Commission to be made and shall make an annual financial accounting and report in writing to the Members. Its books and records shall be available for examination by the Members at all reasonable times. Section 119. The commission may delegate authority to its executive committee. Such delegation of authority shall be by resolution motion of the Commission and may be conditioned in such a manner as the commission may determine. Section 1210. The Commission shall adopt By-Laws which may be amended from time to time. Section 1311. The Commission shall assume all responsibility for community cable be responsible for the PEG access channels and cable television programming within or for the geographic area of the Member cities of the Commission as more specifically delegated to the Commission from each Member pursuant to the terms and conditions of A Resolution Transfer- ring Community Television programming Responsibilities from Group W Cable of the North Suburbs/Inc., d/b/a Cable T. V. North Central. Should any Member withdraw from the commission as of the date of any renewal of the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance, or in any year thereafter, the withdrawing Member shall assume all responsibility for community cable PEG access cable television channels and television programming within or for the geographic 6 2015 Final – Redline Version boundaries of the withdrawing municipality, as more specifically delineated in Article XI, Sections 2 or 3, of this Agreement. Section 1412. The Commission may designate an entity or entities to perform any functions the Commission deems necessary relative to the commission's responsibility for community programming. The Commission may provide funds, support services, and the use of equipment and property to the designated entity, provided that title to all equipment and property shall not pass to the designated entity without the prior approval of all directors. IX. OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the Commission shall consist of a chair, a vice-chair, and a secretary and a treasurer secretary/treasurer. Officers of the commission shall be elected annually for one-year terms. Officers shall be limited to two consecutive one-year terms in a given office. Section 2. A vacancy in the office of chair, vice-chair, or secretary/treasurer secretary or treasurer shall occur for any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of a director shall occur. Vacancies in these offices shall be filled by the commission for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 3. The four three officers shall all be members of the executive committee. Section 4. The chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and the executive committee. The vice-chair shall act as chair in the absence of the chair. Section 5. The secretary/treasurer shall be responsible for keeping a record of all of the proceedings of the commission and executive committee. and Section 6. The treasurer shall be responsible for custody of all funds, for the keeping of all financial records of the Commission and for such other matters as shall be delegated by the commission. The Commission may require that the secretary/treasurer post a fidelity bond or other insurance against loss of Commission funds in an amount approved by the Commission, at the expense of the Commission. Said fidelity bond or other insurance may cover all persons authorized to handle funds of the Commission. Section 76. The Commission may appoint such other officers as it deems necessary. All such officers shall be appointed from the membership of the commission. X. FINANCIAL MATTERS 7 2015 Final – Redline Version Section 1. The fiscal year of the Commission shall be the calendar year. Section 2. Commission funds may be expended by the commission in accordance with the procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by Minnesota Statutory Cities. Orders, checks and drafts must be signed by any two of the officers. Other legal instruments shall be executed, with authority of the commission, by the chair and secretary/treasurer. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in accordance with the procedures established by law for Minnesota Statutory Cities. Section 3. The financial contributions of the Members in support of the Commission shall be in direct proportion to the percent of annual franchise fee revenues of each Member to the total franchise fee revenues of the System for the prior year multiplied by the Commission's total annual budgetassessment to the Members. The annual budget shall establish the contribution of each Member for the ensuing year and a timetable for the payment of said contribution. The remainder of any franchise fee paid to the Member by Grantee shall be used for cable-related expenses. Section 4. A proposed budget for the ensuing calendar year shall be formulated by the Commission and submitted to the Members on or before August 1October 15. Such budget shall be deemed approved by a Member unless, prior to October 15 preceeding the effective date of the proposed budget, the Member gives notice in writing to the Commission that it is withdrawing from the Commission. Final action adopting a budget for the ensuing calendar year shall be taken by the Commission on or before November 1 December 15 of each year. Section 5. Any Member may inspect and copy the commission books and records at any and all reasonable times. All books and records shall be kept in accordance with normal and accepted accounting procedures and principles used by Minnesota Statutory cities. XI. DURATION Section 1. The Commission shall continue for an indefinite term unless the number of Members shall become less than five. The Commission may also be terminated by mutual agreement of all of the Members at any time. Section 2. In order to prevent obligation for its financial contribution to the Commission for the ensuing year, a Member shall withdraw from the Commission by filing a written notice with the secretary Commission by October 15 July 1 of any year giving notice of withdrawal 8 2015 Final – Redline Version effective at the end of that calendar year; and membership shall continue until the effective date of the withdrawal. Prior to the effective date of withdrawal, a notice of withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by October 15 by a Member. If a Member withdraws before dissolution of the commission, the Member shall have no claim against the assets of the Commission. A Member withdrawing after October 15 shall be obligated to pay its entire contribution for the ensuing year as outlined in the budget of the Commission for the ensuing year. Section 3. Should any Member withdraw from the Commission, as of the date of any renewal of the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance, or in any year thereafter, the withdrawing member shall assume the responsibilities for community PEG access cable television channels and programming within and for the geographic boundaries of the withdrawing municipality as described in Article VIII, section 1311, herein. For the years following withdrawal pursuant to this section and so long as the "Resolution Transferring Community Television Programming Responsibilities” is effective, the withdrawing municipality shall receive from the Commission at the time of receipt by the Commission of the quarterly programming monies from the cable company an amount of money equal to the withdrawing municipality’s pro rata share of the quarterly programming monies. Pro rata shall mean that percentage which the municipality would have had of the total votes of the Commission, had all ten municipalities remained members of the Commission. Additionally, the withdrawing municipality shall receive a pro rata share of any portion of the $650,000 payment made to the Commission which the Commission has not specifically designated for the repair or replacement of equipment or facilities. Section 4. In the event of dissolution, the Commission shall determine the measures necessary to affect the dissolution and shall provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Upon dissolution of the commission, all remaining assets of the Commission, after payment of obligations, shall be distributed among the then existing Members in proportion to the most recent Member-by- Member breakdown of the franchise fee as reported by the Grantee. The Commission shall continue to exist after dissolution for such period, no longer than six months, as is necessary to wind up its affairs but for no other purpose. After dissolution, all initial Members of the Commission shall receive their pro rata share of any quarterly annual and lump sum payments made by the cable company pursuant to "A Resolution Transferring Community Television Programming Responsibilities." 9 2015 Final – Redline Version IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned municipality has caused this Agreement to be signed on its behalf this ___ day of _____ , 20__ WITNESSED BY: ___________________________________of ______________________________________ __________________________________by: ______________________________________ I t s : _____________________________ Filed in the office of the NSCC this _________ day of ______________________, 20___. Prepared by: Michael R. Bradley Bradley Hagen & Gullikson, LLC 1976 Wooddale Drive, Suite 3A Woodbury, MN 55125 (651) 379-0900 mike@bradleylawmn.com 1 Revised 2015 AMENDED NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE I. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the state of Minnesota. This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota statutes Section 471.59, as amended. II. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this Agreement is to establish an organization to administer and enforce the respective cable franchises of the parties; to administer the procedure for the renewal of the existing cable franchises and the procedure for the award of new cable franchises; to promote, coordinate, administer and develop PEG access cable television channels and programming; and to conduct such other activities authorized herein as may be necessary to establish and enforce consumer protection standards for cable subscribers of the members of the organization. III. NAME The name of the organization is the North Suburban Communications Commission (NSCC). IV. DEFINITION OF TERMS Section 1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this Article shall have the meanings given to them. Section 2. “Commission” means the Board of Directors created pursuant to this Agreement. Section 3. "Council" means the governing body of a member. Section 4. “Franchise” means that cable communications franchise granted by all cities listed in Article V, section 1. 2 Section 5. “Grantee” means any person or entity to whom a franchise has been granted by a member. Section 6. "Member" means a municipality which enters into this Agreement. Section 7. “System” means that cable communications system more specifically defined in the Franchise Ordinance of the Member. V. MEMBERSHIP Section 1. The municipalities of Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Lauderdale, Moundsview, New Brighton, North Oaks, Roseville, and St. Anthony are eligible to be the Members of the Commission. Any municipality geographically contiguous to any of these named municipalities and served by a cable communications system through the same Grantee may become a Member pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Section 2. Any municipality desiring to become a Member shall execute a copy of this Agreement and conform to all requirements herein. Section 3. The initial Members shall be those municipalities listed in Section 1 of this Article V. Section 4. Municipalities desiring to become Members after the date specified in Article V, Section 3, may be admitted by an affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of the Members of the commission, with at least five (5) Members voting in the affirmative. The Commission may, by resolution, impose conditions upon the admission of additional members. VI. DIRECTORS; VOTING Section 1. Each Member shall be entitled to one (1) director to represent it on the Commission. Each director is entitled to vote in direct proportion to the percent of annual revenues attributable to the municipality represented by the director to the total annual revenues of the system for the prior year rounded to the nearest whole number, provided, however, that each director shall have at least one vote. For the purposes of this section, the annual revenues for each Member and the total annual system revenues as of December 31 of each year shall be determined by the records of the cable operator filed with the commission with the annual franchise fee. Prior to the first commission meeting in March of each year, the 3 Secretary/Treasurer of the commission shall determine the number of votes for each Member in accordance with this section and certify the results to the Chair. Section 2. A director shall be appointed by resolution of the Council of each Member. A director shall serve until a successor is appointed. Directors shall serve without compensation from the Commission. Section 3. Each Member may appoint an alternate director or directors. The Commission, in its By-Laws, may prescribe the extent of an alternate's powers and duties. Section 4. A vacancy in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 351.02 or upon a revocation of a director's appointment duly filed by a Member with the commission. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term of director by the Council of the Member whose position on the Commission is vacant. Section 5. There shall be no voting by proxy, but all votes must be cast by the director or the duly authorized alternate at a Commission meeting. Section 6. The presence of five directors representing a majority of the total authorized votes of all directors shall constitute a quorum, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Section 7. A director shall not be eligible to vote on behalf of the director's municipality during the time said municipality is in default on any contribution or payment to the commission. During the existence of such default, the vote or votes of such Member shall not be counted for the purposes of this Agreement. Section 8. All official actions of the commission must receive two-thirds (2/3) of all authorized votes cast on that issue at a duly constituted meeting of the Commission and the affirmative vote of five directors. Abstentions shall not be considered authorized votes cast. VII. EFFECTIVE DATE Section 1. A municipality may enter into this Agreement by resolution of its council and the duly authorized execution of a copy of this Agreement by its proper officers. Thereupon, the clerk or other appropriate officer of the municipality shall file a duly executed copy of this Agreement, together with a certified copy of the authorizing resolution, with the Commission. 4 Section 2. This Agreement and any amendments thereto are effective on the date when executed agreements and authorizing resolutions of all of the members named in Article V, Section 1, have been filed as provided in this Article. VIII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION Section 1. The powers and duties of the Commission shall include the powers set forth in this Article. Section 2. The Commission may make such contracts, grants, and take such other action as it deems necessary and appropriate to accomplish the general purposes of the organization. The Commission may not contract for the purchase of real estate without the prior authorization of the member municipalities. Any purchases or contracts made shall conform to the requirements applicable to Minnesota statutory cities. Section 3. The commission shall assume all authority and undertake all tasks necessary to coordinate, administer, and enforce the Franchise of each Member except for that authority and those tasks specifically retained by a Member. Section 4. The Commission may provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in actions or proceedings at law in which it may have an interest, and may employ counsel for that purpose. It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its powers and duties. Such employees may be on a full time, part-time or consulting basis, as the Commission determines, and the Commission may make any required employer contributions which local governmental units are authorized or required to make by law. Section 5. The Commission may conduct such research and investigation and take such action as it deems necessary including participation and appearance in proceedings of State and Federal regulatory, legislative or administrative bodies, or on any matter related to or affecting cable communication franchises. Section 6. The Commission may obtain from Grantee and from any other source such information relating to the cable communications franchises as any member is entitled to obtain from Grantee or others. Section 7. The Commission may accept gifts, apply for and use grants, enter into agreements required in connection therewith and hold, use and dispose of money or property received as a gift or grant in accordance with the terms thereof. 5 Section 8. The Commission shall make an annual, independent audit of the books of the Commission and shall make an annual financial accounting and report in writing to the Members. Its books and records shall be available for examination by the Members at all reasonable times. Section 9. The commission may delegate authority to its executive committee. Such delegation of authority shall be by motion of the Commission and may be conditioned in such a manner as the commission may determine. Section 10. The Commission shall adopt By-Laws which may be amended from time to time. Section 11. The Commission shall be responsible for the PEG access channels and cable television programming within or for the geographic area of the Member cities of the Commission Should any Member withdraw from the commission as of the date of any renewal of the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance, or in any year thereafter, the withdrawing Member shall assume all responsibility for PEG access cable television channels and programming within or for the geographic boundaries of the withdrawing municipality, as more specifically delineated in Article XI, Section 3, of this Agreement. Section 12. The Commission may designate an entity or entities to perform any functions the Commission deems necessary relative to the commission's responsibility for community programming. The Commission may provide funds, support services, and the use of equipment and property to the designated entity, provided that title to all equipment and property shall not pass to the designated entity without the prior approval of all directors. IX. OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the Commission shall consist of a chair, a vice-chair, and a secretary/treasurer. Officers of the commission shall be elected annually for one-year terms. Officers shall be limited to two consecutive one-year terms in a given office. Section 2. A vacancy in the office of chair, vice-chair, or secretary/treasurer shall occur for any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of a director shall occur. Vacancies in these offices shall be filled by the commission for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 3. The three officers shall all be members of the executive committee. Section 4. The chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and the executive committee. The vice-chair shall act as chair in the absence of the chair. 6 Section 5. The secretary/treasurer shall be responsible for keeping a record of all of the proceedings of the commission and executive committee and shall be responsible for custody of all funds, for the keeping of all financial records of the Commission and for such other matters as shall be delegated by the commission. The Commission may require that the secretary/treasurer post a fidelity bond or other insurance against loss of Commission funds in an amount approved by the Commission, at the expense of the Commission. Said fidelity bond or other insurance may cover all persons authorized to handle funds of the Commission. Section 6. The Commission may appoint such other officers as it deems necessary. All such officers shall be appointed from the membership of the commission. X. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of the Commission shall be the calendar year. Section 2. Commission funds may be expended by the commission in accordance with the procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by Minnesota Statutory Cities. Orders, checks and drafts must be signed by any two of the officers. Other legal instruments shall be executed, with authority of the commission, by the chair and secretary/treasurer. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in accordance with the procedures established by law for Minnesota Statutory Cities. Section 3. The financial contributions of the Members in support of the Commission shall be in direct proportion to the percent of annual franchise fee revenues of each Member to the total franchise fee revenues of the System for the prior year multiplied by the Commission's total annualassessment to the Members. Section 4. A proposed budget for the ensuing calendar year shall be formulated by the Commission and submitted to the Members on or before October 15. Final action adopting a budget for the ensuing calendar year shall be taken by the Commission on or before December 15 of each year. Section 5. Any Member may inspect and copy the commission books and records at any and all reasonable times. All books and records shall be kept in accordance with normal and accepted accounting procedures and principles used by Minnesota Statutory cities. 7 XI. DURATION Section 1. The Commission shall continue for an indefinite term unless the number of Members shall become less than five. The Commission may also be terminated by mutual agreement of all of the Members at any time. Section 2. In order to prevent obligation for its financial contribution to the Commission for the ensuing year, a Member shall withdraw from the Commission by filing a written notice with the Commission by July 1 of any year giving notice of withdrawal effective at the end of that calendar year; and membership shall continue until the effective date of the withdrawal. Prior to the effective date of withdrawal, a notice of withdrawal may be rescinded by October 15 by a Member. If a Member withdraws before dissolution of the commission, the Member shall have no claim against the assets of the Commission. A Member withdrawing after October 15 shall be obligated to pay its entire contribution for the ensuing year as outlined in the budget of the Commission for the ensuing year. Section 3. Should any Member withdraw from the Commission, the withdrawing member shall assume the responsibilities for PEG access cable television channels and programming within and for the geographic boundaries of the withdrawing municipality as described in Article VIII, section 11, herein. Section 4. In the event of dissolution, the Commission shall determine the measures necessary to affect the dissolution and shall provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Upon dissolution of the commission, all remaining assets of the Commission, after payment of obligations, shall be distributed among the then existing Members in proportion to the most recent Member-by-Member breakdown of the franchise fee as reported by the Grantee. The Commission shall continue to exist after dissolution for such period, no longer than six months, as is necessary to wind up its affairs but for no other purpose. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned municipality has caused this Agreement to be signed on its behalf this ___ day of _____ , 20__ WITNESSED BY: ___________________________________of ______________________________________ __________________________________by: ______________________________________ Its: _____________________________ Filed in the office of the NSCC this _________ day of ______________________, 20___. Prepared by: Michael R. Bradley Bradley Hagen & Gullikson, LLC 1976 Wooddale Drive, Suite 3A Woodbury, MN 55125 (651) 379-0900 mike@bradleylawmn.com CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-027 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE WHEREAS, the North Suburban Communications Commission Joint Powers Agreement was established in 1983; WHEREAS, the North Suburban Communications Commission Joint Powers Agreement was amended in 1990; WHEREAS, amendments have been suggested to the North Suburban Communications Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of a Cable Communications Franchise; AND WHEREAS, approving the amended North Suburban Communications Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of a Cable Communications Franchise create current practice, language consistency and clarity. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: That the City of Arden Hills hereby approves the Amended North Suburban Communications Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of a Cable Commissions Franchise. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF March, 2015. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk CONSENT ITEM – 5C City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Recycling & Garbage\2015\RFP & Contract_Recycling Services\CC Packet_(3-30-15) - Cart Purchase Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Purchase of Residential Recycling Carts – Resolution 2015-023 Requested Action Approve Resolution 2015-023 for the purchase of residential recycling carts from Cascade Engineering in the amount of $102,980. The Public Entity Innovation Grant (PEIG) received from Ramsey County will be used to cover $100,000 of the purchase and the remaining balance in the amount $2,980 will be covered by reserves in the Recycling Fund. Background During the City Council Work Session on March 16, 2015, the Council selected a recycling cart design and directed staff to move forward with the order and purchase of recycling carts from Cascade Engineering. The recycling cart order includes 2,600 sixty-four (64) gallon carts and 200 thirty-two (32) gallon carts. In addition, every cart will have an embedded stamp of the City’s logo on each side of the cart along with an embedded “Recycling Only” stamp on the lid with graphics and text depicting the accepted recyclable materials. The purchase includes a black recycling cart and a green lid. The approved recycling cart design can be viewed in Attachment C. During the cart roll-out all single-family dwellings will receive a sixty-four (64) gallon recycling cart. Residents that request a smaller thirty-two (32) gallon cart will be able to exchange their sixty-four (64) gallon cart after three (3) months. Staff envisions that additional carts will be purchased in the future as the City expands or as additional carts are needed. CONSENT ITEM – 5C City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Recycling & Garbage\2015\RFP & Contract_Recycling Services\CC Packet_(3-30-15) - Cart Purchase Page 2 of 2 PEIG Grant The City applied for a Public Entity Innovation Grant (PEIG) through Ramsey County for assistance with the purchase of residential recycling carts. On February 25, 2015, the City received notice that a grant in the amount of $100,000 was approved by the PEIG Review Committee to assist in the purchase of recycling carts for the Arden Hills Recycling Program. Timeline • February 23 – City approves five (5) year recycling contract with Republic Services. • February 25 – City received notice of the PEIG approval for $100,000. • March 16 – Council approves recycling cart design and directs staff to place cart order. • March 18 – Order is placed for residential recycling carts. • March 30 – Council to approve the purchase of residential recycling carts. • April 20-24 – Carts are delivered to Arden Hills from Cascade Engineering. • April 27-May 1 – Carts are distributed by Republic Services to City residents. • May 5 & 6– First collection with Republic Services. Attachments A) Resolution 2015-023 – Purchase of Recycling Carts B) Recycling Cart Quote – Cascade Engineering C) Recycling Cart Design D) Draft City Council Work Session Minutes – March 16, 2015 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-023 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING CARTS FROM CASCADE ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills requires the collection and proper management of recyclables within the limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City approved a new recycling contract with Republic Services on February 23, 2015, and WHEREAS, the new recycling contract states that the City will provide recycling carts for residents for the collection of recyclable materials, and WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase recycling carts from Cascade Engineering based on their agreement and pricing through the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA); NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: That the City will purchase 2,600 sixty-four (64) gallon recycling carts and 200 thirty- two gallon recycling carts from Cascade Engineering in the amount of $102,980.00. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ______________________________ ATTEST: DAVID GRANT, MAYOR __________________________________________ AMY DIETL, CITY CLERK Certification: STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS) I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-023 is a true and correct copy presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills at a meeting thereof held in the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota, on the 30th day of March, 2015. ______________________________ AMY DIETL, CITY CLERK Jan Bognoski Q U O T E Cascade Eng/OC Regional Off Ph: 949-462-3682 Quote Number: Q21589 Revision: 2 bognoskij@cascadeng.com Quote Date: 03/05/15 Page: 1 United States Print Date: 03/18/15 Expire Date: 04/04/15 Sold To: SAMP1517 Ship To: SAMP1517 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 United States United States Salesperson 1: 23 Purchase Order: QUOTE REVISED Credit Terms: Ship Via: CH ROB FOB Point: ARDEN HILLS MN Resale: Remarks: NJPA CONTRACT #020613-CEI FREIGHT BASED ON $1070/TRUCK x 4 TRUCKS Ln Item Number Qty Quoted Qty to Rel UM Price Extended Price --- ------------------ ---------- ---------- -- ------------ ---------------- 1 CART 64 BLACK / HS 2600.0 2600.0 EA 35.50 92,300.00 LID MOSS GRN RECYCLABLES ONLY 2 CART 32 BLACK/ HS 200.0 200.0 EA 32.00 6,400.00 LID MOSS GRN RECYCLABLES ONLY 3 ONE-TIME DIE CHG 1.0 1.0 EA 0.00 0.00 CUSTOM HOT STAMP ONE-TIME DIE CHARGE OPF $350.00 HAS BEEN WAIVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Taxable: 4,280.00 Currency: USD Line Total: 98,700.00 Taxable: 98,700.00 0.00% Discount: 0.00 Tax Date: 03/05/15 : 0.00 Shipping 20 : 4,280.00 Taxable Handling Charge 94 : 0.00 Total Tax: 0.00 Total: 102,980.00 REDUCED TO 80%65-50% D165925 (x.x) D 1 6 5 9 2 5 ( x . x ) CASCADE 1:1 03-11-2015 SL ON IBM -2. (TEMPLATE A) ART: 11"W X 4.73H TRIM: 12"W X 7"H VERSION D REDUCED TO 80% CASCADE 1:1 03-18-2015 SL ON IBM 2 ART: 9.69”w X 1.93 DIE SIZE: 13”W x 3”h Holes (6) D165926 (2.8) D 1 6 5 9 2 6 ( 2 . 8 ) Newspaper, Magazines,and Paper Glass Bottles/Jars Aluminum andMetal Cans Cardboard andChipboard Plastic Bottles, Jugsand Containers Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MARCH 16, 2015 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session meeting at 5:03 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Robert Woodburn Absent: Councilmember Brenda Holden Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; City Planner Ryan Streff; Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; Planning Commissioner Andy Holewa; Planning Commissioner Clayton Zimmerman; and Planning Chair Roberta Thompson Mayor Grant requested Item B be discussed prior to Item A. 1. AGENDA ITEMS E. Residential Recycling Carts Discussion City Planner Streff stated on February 23, 2015, the City Council approved a five (5) year contract with Republic Services for Residential Recycling Services. The new contract indicates that the City will purchase recycling carts for each single-family dwelling to be distributed by Republic Services prior to the start date of the recycling contract. The contract with Republic Services is set to begin on May 4, 2015. City Planner Streff reported the City applied for a Public Entity Innovation Grant (PEIG) through Ramsey County for assistance with the purchase of residential recycling carts. On February 25, 2015, the City received notice that a grant in the amount of $100,000 was approved by the PEIG Review Committee to assist in the purchase of recycling carts for the Arden Hills Recycling Program. City Planner Streff explained staff has since obtained recycling cart quotes from four (4) cart companies including Cascade Cart Solutions, Otto Environmental Systems, Rehrig Pacific ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 16, 2015 2 Company, and Toter Waste Equipment. The quotes included 2,700 sixty-four (64) gallon carts, 200 thirty-two (32) gallon carts, and delivery to Arden Hills. Based on the quotes obtained, Cascade Cart Solutions was the lowest provider at $106,530. The recycling cart package from Cascade includes a black cart made from recycled materials and a green lid. An embedded stamp of the City’s logo will be included on each side of the cart along with an embedded “Recycling Only” stamp on each lid with graphics that depict the accepted recyclables. City Planner Streff indicated the proposed purchase includes 2,700 sixty-four (64) gallon carts and 200 thirty-two (32) gallon carts. The proposed number of carts was based on the current number of single-family homes (2,560) within the City and on the expected number of residents that may decide to exchange their larger cart for a smaller thirty-two (32) gallon cart. The industry standard is to order an extra 5% to 10% of the main cart size (64 gallon) to accommodate City expansion, residents that need an additional cart, and warranty exchanges. It is also advised that the City plan for approximately 5% of the carts to be exchanged for a different size (32 gallon). City Planner Streff stated residents that request a smaller thirty-two (32) gallon cart will be able to exchange their sixty-four (64) gallon cart after a 60-90 day trial period. During the cart roll-out all single-family dwellings will receive a sixty-four (64) gallon recycling cart. Staff envisions that additional carts will need to be purchased in the future as the City expands or as additional smaller carts are requested. Mark Broderick, Cascade Engineering, introduced his company to the Council noting it was a manufacturing company based out of Grand Rapids, Michigan that has been in operation since 1989. He stated his containers come with a 10 year warranty. He noted that Waste Management and the City of Shakopee were two of his clients in the metro area. Mayor Grant questioned how the Council wanted to proceed. Councilmember McClung supported the Option 1-1 cart with the pictures of approved recyclable items as this would assist residents with recalling what items can and cannot be recycled. Councilmember Holmes agreed that Option 1-1 for the carts should be selected. Mayor Grant asked if Arden Hills was stamped on one or both sides of the cart. Mr. Broderick reported that Arden Hills would be stamped on both sides of the cart. Mayor Grant and Councilmember Woodburn also supported Option 1-1 for the recycling cart. Mayor Grant questioned what color lid should be selected for the recycling cart. There was consensus of the Council to select the color that was similar to Arden Hills green for the recycling cart lid. Councilmember Holmes inquired if the size of the recycling cart had been determined. She feared that residents would not have enough room in their garage for both a garbage and recycling cart. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 16, 2015 3 Mayor Grant stated this has yet to be decided. Mr. Broderick encouraged the City to consider a larger sized cart in order to avoid residents from disposing of recyclable materials in their garbage container. City Planner Streff discussed staff’s rationale and industry standards for the cart sizing and believed that the 64 gallon would meet the needs of the majority of residents in Arden Hills. Councilmember Holmes suggested that staff consider purchasing more than 200 32 gallon containers to keep this option available to empty nesters and elderly. Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that additional containers would need to be purchased for TCAAP and at that time, sizing options could be reconsidered if there was a need for additional 32 gallon containers. Councilmember McClung believed that the majority of residents would fill a 64 gallon cart on a weekly basis and would be happy with the weekly service. Mr. Broderick indicated that Cascade could always provide more bins in the future, after Arden Hills better determined its needs. Councilmember Holmes recommended that the purchase of 64 gallon containers be reconsidered. Mayor Grant reported that residents may find that after recycling each week with their new container that they may actually need to reduce the size of their garbage container. He questioned why staff was proposing to purchase more containers than single-family residents in Arden Hills. City Planner Streff indicated that based on industry standards a 5 ½ % overage was written into the quote to allow the City to have additional containers on site to accommodate City expansion, residents that need an additional cart, and warranty exchanges. Mayor Grant recommended that only 2,600 64 gallon containers be purchased along with 200 32 gallon containers. He stated that this would allow for the City to purchase another 100 containers in the near future after needs are better understood. The Council supported this recommendation and suggested this purchase be approved by the Council on March 30th . City Administrator Klaers commented that approval on this date would ensure that the new recycling program with recycling carts was in place by May 1st . Mr. Broderick encouraged the City to do a two to three month “no swap” time period as this would allow residents to get used to using their new recycling cart. After that time, a call could be made to the City if a change was necessary. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 16, 2015 4 City Planner Streff indicated that the City would support a 60-90 day trial time period. The Council supported a 90-day trial period in their recommendation. CONSENT ITEM – 5D MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Amy Dietl, City Clerk SUBJECT: Economic Development Commission (EDC) Appointments Background The City of Arden Hills has a nine-member Economic Development Commission (EDC) that advises the City Council on issues related to economic and business development. Currently, four of the nine seats on the EDC are vacant. Two applications to serve as EDC Commissioners were recently submitted to the City. The first applicant is Arden Hills’ resident, Kyle Lassen, who resides at 1400 Skiles Lane. Mr. Lassen graduated from Bethel University with a bachelor’s degree in Business-Finance and Business-Marketing, and he currently works as a Marketing Analyst. The second applicant, also an Arden Hills resident, is Michael Hands, 3493 Siems Court. Mr. Hands, another graduate of Bethel University, has degrees in philosophy and political science and currently works for a tax compliance reporting company. Commissioner Appointments Per the City’s policy on commissioner appointments, interviews with the applicants were conducted by the Mayor, the Chair of the EDC, the EDC Council liaison, and the EDC staff liaison. The interview panel was impressed by both applicants and the education and experience that they have to offer. Mayor Grant asked that staff prepare a recommendation for the City Council to appoint Kyle Lassen and Michael Hands to the EDC. Recommendation Approve Resolution 2015-024 appointing Kyle Lassen and Michael Hands to the Economic Development Commission (EDC). Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2015-024 Attachment B: Kyle Lassen Application Materials Attachment C: Michael Hands Application Materials CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-024 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING KYLE LASSEN AND MICHAEL HANDS AS MEMBERS ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC) FOR TERMS EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 2017. WHEREAS, the City Council appoints residents to serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council regarding the development and redevelopment in the City of Arden Hills; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The City Council appoints Kyle Lassen and Michael Hands to serve as members on the Economic Development Commission (EDC) for terms expiring on December 31, 2017. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. _________________________________________ David Grant, MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, CITY CLERK I would like to be considered to serve on a public committee for the local community in which I live in Arden Hills, MN. I've worked for a local MN business since 2005. In life or business I've always been the go-to-guy for difficult projects. Willing to do whatever it takes to be involved and quickly become an asset. Please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks, Kyle Lassen kblassen@gmail.com 651.356.5245 Amy Dietl From: noreply@civicplus.com Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 12:19 PM To: Amy Dietl Subject:Online Form Submittal: City Commission/Committee Application Form If you are having problems viewing this HTML email, click to view a Text version. City Commission/Committee Application Form Last Name* First Name* Middle Initial Lassen Kyle B Addressl* 1400 Skiles Ln City*State* Zip* Arden Hills MN 55112 Home Number* Work Number* 6513565245 Email Address kblassen@gmail.com If you wish to be considered for more than one committee, please order in number of preference. 1st Choice* 2nd Choice* 3rd Choice* Economic Financial Planning Planning Commission Development and Analysis Commission Committee As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additional/new committees or task forces from time to time. If you have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we will retain your application for future openings in those areas as new committees are created. Other Interests* Wherever help is needed. List any Civic, Professional, and Community Activity involvement. Held an Election Judge Assignment since 2007 --Volunteer- Feed My Starving Children since 2005 --Active member and volunteer at Ignite Church MN(before that Trinity Baptist) Why do you want to be on a committee?* I've always had an interest in wanting to serve my local community. I figure this is a good stepping stone with additional future involvement. What skills, strengths, or abilities do you believe you will add to the committee?* I graduated from Bethel University, Arden Hills in 2005. I've worked for a local MN business since 2005. In life or business I've always been the go-to-guy for difficult projects. Willing to do whatever it takes to be involved and quickly become an asset. 1 List any additional comments: Thanks! References Upload Letter of Upload Resume* Interest* Uploaded: Kyle B Lassen- Resume 11.25.2014.doc Uploaded: Letter of interest 2.2.2015.docx Note: Please be advised that per Minnesota Statute 13.601, Subd. 3, the following information is considered public for applicants to a public committee or commission: name, city, education, employment record, volunteer experience. Once an individual has been appointed to a public committee or commission, all information on this application will be considered public. View the submitted form as well as any attachments that may have been uploaded here: http://www.cityofardenhills.org/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Edit?id=492&fonnlD=54&submissionDataDi splayType=O&backURL=/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Index/54?categoryID=3 The following form was submitted via your website: City Commission/Committee Application Form Last Name: Lassen First Name: Kyle Middle Initial: B Addressl: 1400 Skiles Ln City: Arden Hills State: MN Zip: 55112 Home Number: 6513565245 Work Number: 2 Email Address: kblassen@gmail.com If you wish to be considered for more than one committee,please order in number of preference.: 1 st Choice: Economic Development Commission 2nd Choice: Financial Planning and Analysis Committee 3rd Choice: Planning Commission As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additional/new committees or task forces from time to time. If you have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we will retain your application for future openings in those areas as new committees are created. Other Interests: Wherever help is needed. List any Civic, Professional, and Community Activity involvement.: --Held an Election Judge Assignment since 2007 Volunteer- Feed My Starving Children since 2005 Active member and volunteer at Ignite Church MN(before that Trinity Baptist) Why do you want to be on a committee?: I've always had an interest in wanting to serve my local community. I figure this is a good stepping stone with additional future involvement. What skills, strengths, or abilities do you believe you will add to the committee?: I graduated from Bethel University, Arden Hills in 2005. I've worked for a local MN business since 2005. In life or business I've always been the go-to-guy for difficult projects. Willing to do whatever it takes to be involved and quickly become an asset. List any additional comments: : Thanks! References: Upload Letter of Interest: Letter of interest 2.2.2015.docx Upload Resume: Kyle B Lassen- Resume 11.25.2014.doc Note: Please be advised that per Minnesota Statute 13.601, Subd. 3,the following information is considered 3 public for applicants to a public committee or commission: name, city, education, employment record, volunteer experience. Once an individual has been appointed to a public committee or commission, all information on this application will be considered public. Additional Information: Form Submitted on: 2/2/2015 12:19:29 PM Submitted from IP Address: 205.158.80.194 Referrer Page: http://www.cityofardenhills.org/FormCenter/General-Forms-3/City-CommisionCommittee- Application-Form-54 Form Address: http://www.cityofardenhills.org/FormCenter/General-Forms-3/City-CommissionCommittee- Application-For-54 4 x k KY LE B. ]LASSEN http:lLwww.linkedin.com/inLkylelassen 1400 Skiles Lane•Arden Hills,MN 55112 •Phone: 651.356.5245 •Email: kblassen@gmail.com Work Experience MagnetStreet.com Blaine,MN July 2005-Present Marketing Analyst(ecommerce) May 2011—Present Presented a business case for adding product ratings and reviews to the website Created and executed email strategy that helped MagnetStreet.com gather 10,000+product reviews Developed strategies to include product ratings in paid search ads increasing click through rate by over 15% Researched and presented on the purchase path of key consumer market;used analysis to drive deployment of micro- conversion strategies Developed marketing strategies around micro-conversions;saved work campaign resulted in a l0k weekly revenue lift Grew MagnetStreet's email marketing's effort to 4.5M emails with$1.4M attributed ecommerce revenue Recommended new order process automation and efficiencies;which lead to 150%throughput gains Managed Oracle/RightNow implementation to support key customer service functionality Sr. Business Analyst February 2008—May 2011 Documented business requirements and implemented ExactTarget to automate and standardize email marketing activities Developed a subscriber based email marketing program,grew the wedding subscriber list to 70,000+subscribers Worked with marketing to define segments of subscribers and create personalized content for email messages Drove results managing MagnetStreet's email marketing efforts with revenue of$500K+in first 12 months Managed cross functional email marketing group to cast vision and maximize email marketing efforts Implemented SLI's learning search functionality for MagnetStreet.com ultimately resulting in higher conversion rates(almost double the website average)and average order values Responsible for the ongoing analysis and improvement of our websites search functionality Introduced the idea of using a recommendation engine to drive personalized product recommendations on website Led web team implementing personalized product recommendations for MagnetStreet's website and email marketing Liaison with a consulting group in a strategic effort to consolidate MagnetStreet's brands NetSuite(CRM&ERP)Administrator April 2007—February 2008 Led the roll out of additional NetSuite functionality(HR,Payroll) Contracted third party vendors to create and bring the payroll process in-house for 160+employees Gained familiarity with NetSuite including system administration and customization features Created custom reports using NetSuite's internal reporting tools Worked with database administrator to manage list data including advanced data updates via web services and XML Acted as the point person with NetSuite providing support for process owners and individual users Assessed new modules/features for implementation Utilized NetSuite's advanced marketing technology to create triggers for up-sell email campaigns Business Analyst September 2005—April 2007 Led the company wide integrations of NetSuite(ERP,CRM) Authored standard operating procedures for sales,marketing,payroll,and customer service Initiated NetSuite training sessions for individual user groups increasing user adoption and proficiency Supervised and trained five employees in customer service and telemarketing Worked with management to analyze costs of marketing campaigns and their economic impact ultimately resulting in a segmentation plan to prioritize customers Acquired data analysis experience using SQL;responded to ad hoc reporting requests Mentored by an ex-executive of a Fortune 500 company Outbound Sales July 2005-September 2005 Assisted sales team by making outbound real estate reorder and not for profit sales calls Completed order entries in the production database and followed up with group orders Developed conflict management skills by responding to customer service requests Education University of Minnesota,College of Continuing Education—St. Paul,MN April 2009 Business Analysis Certificate Bethel University—St.Paul,MN May 2005 BA: Business -Finance BA: Business-Marketing Other Qualifications System Proficiencies: Google Analytics;ExactTarget;Oracle/RightNow;BazaarVoice;TrustPilot;Certona; SLI Systems Microsoft: Visio,Project,Word,Excel,PowerPoint,Internet Explorer,SQL Personal Skills: Strong organization and prioritization skills,ability to manage several tasks simultaneously Results driven,self-motivated,strong work ethic,trustworthy,team player,detail-oriented Print Last Name*First Name*Middle Initial Address1*Address2 City*State*Zip* Home Number*Home Fax Work Number*Work Fax Email Address If you wish to be considered for more than one committee, please order in number of preference. 1st Choice*2nd Choice*3rd Choice* As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additional/new committees or task forces from time to time. If you have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we will retain your application for future openings in those areas as new committees are created. City Commission/Committee Application Form - Submission #454 Date Submitted: 12/8/2014 http://www.cityofardenhills.org/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/454 1 of 3 3/27/2015 8:01 AM Other Interests* List any Civic, Professional, and Community Activity involvement. Why do you want to be on a committee?* What skills, strengths, or abilities do you believe you will add to the committee?* List any additional comments: References 1. Name*Address Phone Number 2. Name*Address Phone Number http://www.cityofardenhills.org/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/454 2 of 3 3/27/2015 8:01 AM 3. Name*Address Phone Number Upload Letter of Interest* Resume.pages Upload Resume* Resume.pages Note: Please be advised that per Minnesota Statute 13.601, Subd. 3, the following information is considered public for applicants to a public committee or commission: name, city, education, employment record, volunteer experience. Once an individual has been appointed to a public committee or commission, all information on this application will be considered public. http://www.cityofardenhills.org/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/454 3 of 3 3/27/2015 8:01 AM Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Amy Dietl, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proposed Revision to 2015 Fee Schedule Background The City Council approved the 2015 Fee Schedule at its meeting of December 8, 2014. Discussion The City’s electrical inspector, Peter Tokle of Tokle Inspections, Inc., recently contacted staff to request an increase in electrical permit fees. The current electrical fees were established in 2010 and have not increased since that time. Due to rising costs in supplies, labor, and insurance, Mr. Tokle is proposing to increase electrical permit fees effective July 1, 2015, by approximately 6%. Requested Action Motion to approve Ordinance 2015-001 amending the 2015 Fee Schedule and authorizing publication of the Ordinance Summary. Attachments Attachment A: Electrical Permit Fees (With Tracked Changes in Blue) Attachment B: Electrical Permit Fees (Clean Copy) Attachment C: Memo from Peter Tokle Attachment D: Ordinance 2015-001 – Appendix A – 2015 Fee Schedule Attachment E: Summary of Ordinance 2015-001 CONSENT ITEM – 5E MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT B Fees Adopted Effective 1-1-95 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES HOMEOWNERS AND ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS – Complete an electrical permit form available from the Building Inspections Division. Add $5.00 for State surcharge to total cost of each permit. New or Repair Service/Power Supply 0 to 300 amps = $50 There is a $2 per circuit charge to replace an old panel with a new panel in the same location. The fee is $100 to change a panel in the same location, $40 for a subpanel. Circuits and Feeders 0 to 300 Amp $50.00 0 to 30 Amp $8.00 400 Amp $58.00 31 to 100 Amp $10.00 500 Amp $72.00 101 to 200 Amp $15.00 600 Amp $86.00 300 Amp $20.00 800 Amp $114.00 400 Amp $25.00 1000 Amp $142.00 500 Amp $30.00 1100 Amp $156.00 600 Amp $35.00 1200 Amp $170.00 700 Amp $40.00 Add $14.00 for each additional 100 amps Add $5.00 for each additional 100 amps Minimum Fee Maximum Fee Minimum permit fee is $35.00 $40.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. This is for one inspection only. Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is $70.00 $80.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 amps is $150.00 is $175.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum of 2 RI and 1 final three inspections. Apartment Buildings Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex is $70.00. This does not cover service, unit feeders or house panels. and house wiring. Swimming Pool Additions, Remodels or Basements Finishes Accessory Structures $70.00 $80.00 plus circuits. Tthis includes 2 inspections $70.00 $80.00 this includes up to 8 10 circuits and 2 inspections $70.00 this includes 3 circuits and up to 2 inspections $50 for the panel plus the circuit fees. Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard Street and Parking Lot Lights $4.00 per each standard Transformers and Generators $8.00 per unit plus $.40 cents for each KVA up to 100 KVA + $.30 cents for each KVA above 100 KVA $10 up to 10KVA, $40.00 11KVA to 75KVA $60 75KVA to 299 KVA over 299KVA $150 Retro Fit Lighting $.65 cents per fixture Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 cents per device Re-Inspection Fee (only one final per job). $35.00$40.00 THE PERMIT FEE MAY BE DOUBLED IF THE WORK STARTS BEFORE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED ATTACHMENT B Fees Adopted Effective 1-1-95 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES HOMEOWNERS AND ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS – Complete an electrical permit form available from the Building Inspections Division. Add $5.00 for State surcharge to total cost of each permit. Residential panel replacement is $100.00 sub panel $40.00. New service or power supply is. Circuits and Feeders 0 to 300 Amp $50.00 0 to 30 Amp $8.00 400 Amp $58.00 31 to 100 Amp $10.00 500 Amp $72.00 101 to 200 Amp $15.00 600 Amp $86.00 300 Amp $20.00 800 Amp $114.00 400 Amp $25.00 1000 Amp $142.00 500 Amp $30.00 1100 Amp $156.00 600 Amp $35.00 1200 Amp $170.00 700 Amp $40.00 Add $14.00 for each additional 100 amps Add $5.00 for each additional 100 amps Minimum Fee Maximum Fee Minimum permit fee is $40.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. This is for one inspection only. Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is $80.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 amps is $175.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum of 3 inspections. Apartment Buildings Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex is $70.00. This does not cover service, unit feeders or house panels. Swimming Pool Additions, Remodels or Basements Finishes Accessory Structures $80.00 plus circuits. This includes 2 inspections $80.00 this includes up to 10 circuits and 2 inspections $50.00 for panel plus $8 per circuit. Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard Street and Parking Lot Lights $4.00 per each standard Transformers and Generators $10 up to 10KVA, $40 11 to 75KVA, $60 75KVA to 299 KVA, over 299 KVA is $150. Retro Fit Lighting $.65 cents per fixture Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 cents per device Re-Inspection Fee $40.00 THE PERMIT FEE IS DOUBLED IF THE WORK STARTS BEFORE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED City council in care of Inspection Department. I am proposing a fee schedule change effective 7-1-15 for the following reasons: 1. Simplification of fee calculations: A. Simplified the transformers and generator calculations. B. Simplified the panel and sub panel replacement fee calculation. 2. Reduction of OFPs A. Changed new house permits to include 3 inspections of any kind Rough-in final or reinspection. 3. An approximate fee increase of 6%. 4. The fees were established in 2010. Cost of living has increased by about 7% to 8% in that time-frame, with a corresponding increase in costs (supplies, labor, insurance). Peter Tokle Tokle Inspections Inc. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2015-001 A Special Ordinance Relating to Amending Electrical Permit Fees Payable within the City of Arden Hills for 2015 The City Council of Arden Hills hereby ordains that Appendix “A” containing the Fee Schedule for Calendar year 2015 is hereby amended, and made part of the Municipal Code. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. Adoption Date: Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills on the 30th day of March, 2015. _______________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk Publication Date: Published on the 8th day of April, 2015. Page 1 of 10 City of Arden Hills Ordinance 2015-001 – Appendix A Amended 2015 Fee Schedule I. Administrative Dogs/Cats – Licenses Two years (Pro-rated for second year @ $13.00) $26.00 Dogs/Cats – Duplicate Tags Each $6.50 Dogs/Cats – Boarding $19.00 per day Dogs/Cats – Impoundment Fee $44.00 Dogs/Cats – Surrender Fee Each $25.00 Dogs – Residential Kennel License Annual $21.00 Dogs – Dangerous Dog Fee Annual $500.00 Dogs – Potentially Dangerous Dog Fee Annual $250.00 Copying – Minutes, City Council Meetings Annual $69.00 Copying – Minutes, Planning Commission Meetings Annual $56.00 Copying – Agendas, City Council Meetings Annual $14.00 Copying – Agendas, Planning Commission Meetings Annual $7.00 Copying – Agenda Packets, City Council Meetings Annual Cost based on per sheet, staff labor, and postage Copying – Agenda Packets, Planning Commission Annual Cost based on per sheet, staff labor, and postage Copying – General Any Size $0.25 per side Assessment Search $53.00 per half hour II. Building Construction Building Permits – Permit Fee Fees shall be based according to the 2011 State Statute 326B.153 and are determined by the City’s Building Official Building Permits – Plan Review Fee 65% of Building Permit Fee Building Permits – Re-inspection $40.00 Building Permits – Manufactured Home Location, Swimming Pools, and Demolition $55.00 + $5.00 State Surcharge Building Permits – Special Investigations 100% of Permit Fee State Surcharge – based on valuation fee based on 2011 State Statute 326B.148 Page 2 of 10 State Surcharge – Fixed Fees $5.00 Plumbing Permits – Minimum Fee $40.00 Plumbing Permits – Residential 1.25% of Project Value Plumbing Permits – Non- Residential 1.25% of Project Value + $50.00 Electrical Permits – Minimum Fee $35.00 Electrical Permits – Maximum Single Family Dwelling Fee $150.00 Electrical Permits – General See Exhibit “A” attached to fee schedule Mechanical Permits – Minimum Fee $40.00 Mechanical Permits – Residential 2% of Project Value Mechanical Permits – Non- Residential 1.25% of Project Value + $50.00 Fire Protection Permits – Permit Fee Fees shall be based according to the 2011State Statute 326B.153 and are determined by the City’s Building Official Fire Protection Permits – Plan Review Fee 65% of Permit Fee Fire Protection Permits – Re- inspection $40.00 III. Liquor Licensing On-sale 1,999 square feet (SF) or less $3,465.00 On-sale 2,000 (SF) – 2,999 (SF) $4,620.00 On-sale 3,000 (SF) – 3,999 (SF) $5,775.00 On-sale 4,000 (SF) or more $6,930.00 On-sale, Sunday $200.00 (340A.504 Subd. 3(b) limits $200 fee for Sunday sales) Off-sale $210.00 Club Fee $315.00 On-sale, Malt Beverage $126.00 Off-sale, Malt Beverage $42.00 On-sale, Wine $ 2,000.00 (340A.408 Subd. 2(c) limits fee to $2000 or half of on-sale license fee, whichever is less) Strong Beer No Charge (as part of On-Sale Wine License) Investigation Fee $158.00 Minor Consumption Violation with Server Training First Violation $105.00 Second Violation $525.00 Third Violation $1,050.00 Fourth Violation $1,575.00 Minor Consumption Violation First Violation $525.00 Page 3 of 10 without Server Training Second Violation $1,050.00 Third Violation $1,575.00 Fourth Violation $2,100.00 and may be subject to license revocation IV. Maps and Ordinances Zoning Ordinance Municipal Code Comprehensive Plan $0.25 per side Color Maps (8.5 x 11) $2.00 Color Maps (11 x 17) $4.00 Street Maps $2.00 As-Builts (11 x 17) Based on number of copies and staff time V. Parks & Recreation Youth Athletic Association Field Rental Per four hour time block $8.00 per time block + applicable tax Adult Club / Intramural Field Rental Per two hour time block $21.00 per time block + applicable tax Ball Field Rental, Unlighted Per four hour time block. Tournament fees are extra. $33.00 per time block + applicable tax Ball Field Rental, Lighted Per four hour time block. Tournament fees are extra. $84.00 per time block + applicable tax Ball Field Tournament Fee (Adult), Full Maintenance Includes all day maintenance staff on site $525.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit + applicable tax Ball Field Tournament Fee (Adult), Minimum Maintenance Includes prep for fields and midday drag of fields $315.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit + applicable tax Warming House Rental/Ice Rink Rental Only allowed during non-public use hours $26.00 per hour + $105.00 damage deposit + applicable tax Picnic Shelters Available for reservation $0 Picnic Pavilions – Resident Includes up to five picnic tables $53.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit + $53.00 key deposit + applicable tax Picnic Pavilions – Non-Resident Includes up to five picnic tables $79.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit + $53.00 key deposit + applicable tax Picnic Pavilions – Resident Non-Profit Includes up to five picnic tables $26.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit & $53.00 key deposit Picnic Pavilions – Other Non-Profit Includes up to five picnic tables $63.00 per day + $105.00 damage deposit & $53.00 key deposit Additional Picnic Tables For every two extra tables $5.00 + applicable tax Community Garden Plot – One Plot Annual $34.00 + applicable tax Community Garden Plot – Second Plot Annual $17.00 + applicable tax Page 4 of 10 Room Rental – City Hall, Community Room Per Day (Scheduling a room after regular hours is contingent upon the presence of a city employee; In the event staff is not available, the City reserves the right to deny application). Regular business hour usage: No charge Army National Guard: No charge City Government: No charge Resident, Non-profit: $63.00 Resident, For-profit: $74.00 Non-Resident, Non-profit: $105.00 Non-Resident, For-profit: $137.00 (+ applicable tax) Room Rental – City Hall, Small Conference Room Per Day (Scheduling a room after regular hours is contingent upon the presence of a city employee; In the event staff is not available, the City reserves the right to deny application). Regular business hour usage: No charge Army National Guard: No charge City Government: No charge Resident, Non-profit: $26.00 Resident, For-profit: $32.00 Non-Resident, Non-profit: $42.00 Non-Resident, For-profit: $53.00 (+ applicable tax) Room Rental – Damage Deposit Required $105.00 Equipment Rental – DVD, VCR, T.V. $11.00 + applicable tax VI. Planning and Zoning (Each separate land use request shall be charged a separate fee even if submitted on the same application. In addition to the application fee, all planning cases are subject to a minimum escrow fee to cover any consulting costs the City may incur. Additional charges may apply if the consulting costs exceed the escrow amount. The escrow may be waived, reduced, or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis.) Description Escrow Fees Initial Application Fees Preliminary Plat Administrative Fee $630.00 + $26.00 per lot Escrow $1,575.00 Final Plat Administrative Fee $525.00 + $26.00 per lot Escrow No charge Lot Split/Minor Subdivision Administrative Fee $473.00 Escrow $1,050.00 Rezoning Administrative Fee $630.00 Escrow $1,050.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Fee $893.00 Escrow $1,050.00 Variance Administrative Fee $315.00 Escrow $630.00 Conditional Use Permit or Amendment Administrative Fee $630.00; $315.00 for Home Occupation or if no Site Plan Review is required Escrow $630.00 Interim Use Permit or Amendment Administrative Fee $630.00; $315.00 if no Site Plan Review is required Escrow $735.00 Planned Unit Development Administrative Fee $630.00 Page 5 of 10 Master Plan Escrow $2,100.00 Final Planned Unit Development Administrative Fee $315.00 Escrow $630.00 Planned Unit Development Amendment Administrative Fee $630.00; $315.00 if no Site Plan Review is required Escrow $2,100.00 Planned Unit Development Concept Review Administrative Fee $315.00 Escrow No Charge Vacation of Easement Administrative Fee $420.00 Escrow $630.00 Site Plan Review Administrative Fee $315.00 Escrow $630.00 City Code Amendment Administrative Fee $630.00 Escrow $1,050.00 Zoning Code Amendment Administrative Fee $630.00 Escrow $1,050.00 Zoning Letter Per half hour $53.00 + $53.00 per half hour after one hour of staff research time Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified Administrative Fee (Escrow may also apply) $210.00 Zoning Permit – New Fence Construction or Expansion $53.00 for first 100 lineal feet + $11.00 each additional 100 lineal feet, or fraction thereof Zoning Permit – New Driveway Construction or Expansion $53.00 for first 1,000 square feet + $11.00 each additional 1,000 square feet, or fraction thereof Recreational Vehicle Parking Permit 7 Day Permit, renewable once per 12 months $11.00 Home Occupation I Permit No charge Home Occupation II Permit Consulting fees and administrative escrow $368.00 Right-of-Way Permit Per Excavation $184.00 Grading & Erosion Control Fees Administrative Fee $158.00 Escrow $3,675 / acre Appeal of Administrative Zoning, Sign, or Subdivision Decisions Cost of staff time to prepare appeal information $105.00 VII. Utility Hookup Charges Water Permits – Service Installation/Repairs/Alteration Per inspection $40.00 Water Permits – Interior Plumbing, New Home $40.00 Water Turn On/Off, Temporary $40.00 Water Permanent Disconnect $215.00 Curb Box and Service Lead, 1” Service Connection on Unsurfaced Street $165.00 Page 6 of 10 Restoration of Typical Road Mix Street $105.00 Restoration of Higher-Type Street Set by Engineer Larger than 1” Service Connection Set by Inspector Water Permits – Plan Check Fee Set by Inspector Water Permits – Re-inspection $40.00 Water Meter/Spacer Charges – Customer Requested Water Meter Accuracy Test Fee includes removal of meter, bench test at maintenance facility, and returning meter to residence; Fee will not be applied if the meter is found to be inaccurate to a degree exceeding three percent (3%) from the result of the bench test Based on Meter Size Contact Public Works for Quote Water Meter/Spacer Charges – 3/4” x 7 1/2” Meter $390.00 Water Meter/Spacer Charges – 3/4” x 9” Meter Contact Public Works for Quote Water Meter/Spacer Charges – 1” Meter $480.00 Water Meter/Spacer Charges – Greater than 1” Contact Public Works for Quote Water Connection Fee – Connection fee for previously un-served or expanded lots $840.00 per acre or portion thereof Water Availability Fee – New or Additional Connections The units are based on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculating new sewer availability charge (SAC) units $525.00 per unit Sewer Connection Fee – Connection fee for previously un-served or expanded lots $840.00 per acre or portion thereof Sewer Availability Fee – New or Additional Connections The units are based on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculating new sewer availability charge (SAC) units $525.00 per unit Sewer Permits – Service Installation/Alternations/Repairs Per inspection $40.00 Sewer Permits – Plan Review Fee Set by Inspector Sewer Permits – Reinspections $40.00 per hour Sewer Access Charge Set by Met Council Annually $2,485.00 Sanitary Sewer Utility Prohibited Sump Pump Connection Surcharge $100.00 per month VIII. Miscellaneous/Retail Activities Page 7 of 10 Boutique/Garage Sale Application/notification of City Hall required No charge Casual Roadside Stands Application/notification of City Hall required No charge Tent Permit $55.00+ State Surcharge Sidewalk Sales $53.00 Business Licensing – Amusement Facilities Includes arcade, dance hall, movie theater, pool/billiard tables, bowling alleys, indoor tennis, skating facility, outdoor tennis, driving ranges, etc. $105.00 Business Licensing – Wholesale Bulk Fuel Storage Liability insurance required $210.00 Business Licensing – Hotel/Motel $6.50 per room Business Licensing – Courtesy Bench, Non-advertising $26.00 Business Licensing – Courtesy Bench, Advertising $79.00 Business Licensing – Mechanical/Electronic Devices Includes musical devices, amusement rides, bowling alleys, etc. $15.00 per location + $15.00 per machine (MN Statute 449.15 sets maximum permit fee at $15 per location and $15 per machine) Business Licensing – Retail Sales Includes antique shops, beauty/barber shops, boat dealers, Christmas tree sales, dry cleaning, laundry, bakery, candy, meats, wholesale foods, caterers, motor vehicle sales, optometrist, mortuary, video sales/rentals, over-the-counter tobacco sales, vending machines (excluding tobacco), & other retail goods not listed $53.00 Business Licensing – Restaurants, Cafes, Coffee Houses, etc. $21.00 per 1,000 square feet, or fraction thereof Business Licensing – Restaurants, Drive-Thru $315.00 Business Licensing – Service Stations $105.00 Business Licensing – Grocery $21.00 per 1,000 square feet, or fraction thereof Page 8 of 10 Charitable Gambling Permit – Per Minnesota State Statute, Chapter 349 Includes investigation fee Local Gambling Tax Lawful Gambling Fund $158.00 3% of organizations’ gross receipts from all lawful gambling, less prizes paid out 10% of net profits Tobacco Sales License Includes investigation fee $300.00 Fireworks Sales As part of existing business $100.00 (MN Statute 624.20 sets maximum permit fee at $100.00) Fireworks Sales Exclusive Business $350.00 (MN Statute 624.20 sets maximum permit fee at $350.00) Massage Therapist Annual Fee, Includes investigation fee $53.00 Massage Therapist Establishment Annual Fee, Includes investigation fee $158.00 Recreational Outdoor Archery Range $200 first year $50 annual renewal Solicitors, Peddlers, Transient Permit – For-Profit Organizations Please reference Section 340 of the Municipal Code for more information $158.00 background investigation + $105.00 per month permit fee Solicitors, Peddlers, Transient Permit – Non-Profit Organizations Please reference Section 340 of the Municipal Code for more information No charge IX. Signs Initial Fee Per Sign $53.00 Permanent Signs, Annual Renewal Per Sign, 100 square feet or less (maximum allowable size) $21.00 Temporary Signs $53.00 Signs, Impoundment First Offense $26.00 Signs, Impoundment Second Offense $53.00 Signs, Impoundment Third Offense $105.00 X. Miscellaneous Fees/Permits Rubbish Hauler Annual $158.00 Recycling Hauler Annual $158.00 Contractor License Annual $55.00 Miscellaneous Permit Fee For all other permits not listed $40.00 Staff Research $53.00 per half hour Penalties for Late Payment Failure to pay any penalty imposed shall be grounds for the suspension or termination of any license issued by the City 10% of license fee or $32.00, whichever is greater Tobacco Sales, Illegal First Offense $105.00 Page 9 of 10 Tobacco Sales, Illegal Second Offense within 24 months $525.00 Tobacco Sales, Illegal Third Offense within 24 months $1,050.00 and 7 business day suspension or 30 day suspension of license + admin fine of $250 Tobacco Sales, Illegal Fourth Offense within 24 months Revocation of the license for a one year period Candidate Filing Fee $2.00 Insufficient Funds/Returned Check Fee $35.00 Rental Registration Fee $42.00 per rental unit Rental Registration Penalty Fee $84.00 per rental unit Residential Contractor License Check $5.00 Business Subsidy Application Fee Required to reimburse City for full cost of review $2,100.00 + $10,500.00 escrow Construction Activity Waiver Per Waiver Application $263.00 XI. False Alarm Fees False Alarm First two alarms No charge + letter False Alarm Three through ten alarms $60.00 per alarm False Alarm Over ten alarms $160.00 per alarm XII. Investigation Fees Tobacco, Liquor, Charitable Gambling, & Solicitor’s Permits $158.00 XIII. Utility Use Charges Water Per Quarter: Meter Charge 3/4” Meter Size or Smaller $ 23.41 Meter Charge 1” Meter Size $ 56.56 Meter Charge 1.5” Meter Size $ 119.63 Meter Charge 2” Meter Size $ 192.73 Meter Charge 3” Meter Size $ 419.50 Meter Charge 4” Meter Size $ 628.85 Meter Charge 6” Meter Size $ 1047.50 Meter Charge 8” Meter Size $ 2111.68 Meter Charge 10” Meter Size $ 3001.30 Meter Charge 12” Meter Size $ 4257.34 Consumption: 1-10,000 gals. gallons $ 2.60 per 1,000 gallons (pro- rated) Consumption: 10,001-35,000 gals. gallons $ 3.38 per 1,000 gallons (pro- rated) Consumption: Over 35,000 gals. gallons $ 5.98 per 1,000 gallons (pro- rated) Water Test Fee set by MN State Health Dept $1.59 Sanitary Sewer Per Quarter: Base Charge – Single Family per lot $ 89.01 Base Charge – Multiple Family per dwelling $ 89.01 Page 10 of 10 Usage Over 15,000 gals. – Single Family/Multiple Family gallons $ 5.13 per 1,000 gallons (pro- rated) Sanitary Sewer – Commercial Apartment/Condominium gallons $ 5.55 per 1,000 gallons (pro- rated) Sanitary Sewer - Mobile Home per unit $ 96.27 Surface Water Per Quarter: Residential - Single Family per lot $ 13.87 Residential – Multiple Family per dwelling $ 17.98 Apartment / Condominium per acre $ 113.21 Industrial / Commercial per acre $ 176.76 Undeveloped per acre $ 20.80 Standby Per Quarter: Standby 1” Service Line or smaller $ 8.00 Standby 1.25” Service Line $ 11.55 Standby 1.5” Service Line $ 15.92 Standby 2” Service Line $ 24.32 Standby 3” Service Line $ 54.87 Standby 4” Service Line $ 97.85 Standby 6” Service Line $ 219.41 Standby 8” Service Line $ 390.48 Standby 10” Service Line $ 610.80 Standby 12” Service Line $ 877.84 Standby Shared 6.95 $ 26.16 XIV. Recycling Fee and Bins Per Residential Parcel with curbside recycling Annual $42.60 Per Residential Parcel without curbside recycling Annual $2.00 Recycling Bin One bin provided free of charge to each newly constructed home $6.00 for each additional bin ATTACHMENT B Fees Adopted Effective 1-1-95 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES – Exhibit A HOMEOWNERS AND ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS – Complete an electrical permit form available from the Building Inspections Division. Add $5.00 for State surcharge to total cost of each permit. Residential panel replacement is $100.00 sub panel $40.00. New service or power supply is. Circuits and Feeders 0 to 300 Amp $50.00 0 to 30 Amp $8.00 400 Amp $58.00 31 to 100 Amp $10.00 500 Amp $72.00 101 to 200 Amp $15.00 600 Amp $86.00 300 Amp $20.00 800 Amp $114.00 400 Amp $25.00 1000 Amp $142.00 500 Amp $30.00 1100 Amp $156.00 600 Amp $35.00 1200 Amp $170.00 700 Amp $40.00 Add $14.00 for each additional 100 amps Add $5.00 for each additional 100 amps Minimum Fee Maximum Fee Minimum permit fee is $40.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. This is for one inspection only. Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is $80.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 amps is $175.00 plus $5.00 State surcharge. Maximum of 3 inspections. Apartment Buildings Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex is $70.00. This does not cover service, unit feeders or house panels. Swimming Pool Additions, Remodels or Basements Finishes Accessory Structures $80.00 plus circuits. This includes 2 inspections $80.00 this includes up to 10 circuits and 2 inspections $50.00 for panel plus $8 per circuit. Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard Street and Parking Lot Lights $4.00 per each standard Transformers and Generators $10 up to 10KVA, $40 11 to 75KVA, $60 75KVA to 299 KVA, over 299 KVA is $150. Retro Fit Lighting $.65 cents per fixture Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 cents per device Re-Inspection Fee $40.00 THE PERMIT FEE IS DOUBLED IF THE WORK STARTS BEFORE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2015-001 On the 30th day of March, 2015, the Arden Hills City Council adopted Appendix A of Ordinance No. 2015-001, and by five affirmative votes pursuant to Minn. Stat. §412.191, Subd. 4, directed that a summary of Appendix A of Ordinance 2015-001 be published. Appendix A of Ordinance 2015-001 entitled “Amended 2015 Fee Schedule” an Ordinance Relating to Fees Payable within the City of Arden Hills for 2015. The primary purpose of the ordinance amendment is to update the Municipal Code to reflect fees for the calendar year of 2015. A full copy of Appendix A of Ordinance 2015-001 is available for inspection by any person during regular business hours at the office of the City Administrator, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112. The Ordinance is also available online at http://www.cityofardenhills.com CONSENT ITEM – 5F City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-036 - Red Fox Business Center PUD\Memos_Reports_14-036 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #14-036 Applicant: North American Land Company (Roberts Management Group) Property Location: 1235 Red Fox Road Subject: Red Fox Business Center Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Agreement Requested Action Motion to approve the Red Fox Business Center Master and Final PUD and CUP Agreement, based on the February 23, 2015, City Council approval of Planning Case 14-036. Background On February 23, 2015, the City Council approved Planning Case 14-036 for a Master and Final PUD and CUP for the Red Fox Business Center located at 1235 Red Fox Road for the construction of two (2) multi-tenant light industrial buildings. The City Attorney has prepared the Master and Final PUD and CUP Agreement (Attachment A). The document has been reviewed and signed by the North American Land Company and Roberts Management Group. Attachments A. Red Fox Business Center Master and Final PUD and CUP Agreement. 168952 (reserved for recording information) MASTER AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RED FOX BUSINESS CENTER (PC# 14 -036 ) THIS MASTER AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (“Permit”) is dated effective March 30, 2015, and is entered into by and between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota statutory city (“City”); NORTH AMERICAN LAND COMPANY, a Minnesota limited liability company (“North American”) and ROBERTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Roberts”) (North American Land Company and Roberts Management Group, LLC collectively “Developer”). 1. RECITALS. A. On the 16th day of January, 2015, the Developer submitted a complete application requesting the approval of a Planned Unit Development Master Plan (“PUD-Master Plan”) and approval 180304 of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for its development plan, to be known as RED FOX BUSINESS CENTER; for the property at 1235 Red Fox Road, Arden Hills, legally described as: PARCELS 1 and 2: Lot 3, Block 1, Northwoods; Outlot A, Northwoods, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the restrictions and snow fence easement in favor of the State of Minnesota as set forth in the instrument recorded in Book 2064 of Ramsey County Records, page 157. Covers part of highway adjoining Outlot A. Torrens property. Certificate of Title No. 594565 PARCEL 3: Part of Lot 4, Block 1, Northwoods, lying North of the South 271 feet thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the restrictions and snow fence easement in favor of the State of Minnesota as set forth in the instrument recorded in Book 2064 of Ramsey County Records, page 157. Covers part of highway adjoining Outlot A. Torrens property. Certificate of Title No. 594570 B. The RED FOX BUSINESS CENTER development plan is illustrated and described on the following documents (“Development Plan Documents,” “Plan Documents” or “Plans”). The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans will be prepared and submitted to the City for approval. 1. Master and Final PUD Plan Set, consisting of: a. A0.1 – Title Sheet – 1/26/15 b. C0 – Topographic Survey – 7/22/14 c. C1 – Demolition Plan – 1/29/15 d. C2 – Paving & Dimension Plan – 1/29/15 e. C3 – Grading Plan – 1/29-15 f. C4 – Erosion Control Plan – 1/29/15 g. C5 – Utility Plan – 1/29/15 h. C6 – Details – 1/29/15 i. C7 – Utility Details – 1/29/15 j. PM1 – Partial Site Plan Photometrics – 11/26/14 k. PM2 – Partial Site Plan Photometrics – 11/26/14 l. PM3 – Site Plan Photometrics – 11/26/14 m. L1 – Tree Preservation Plan – 1/29/15 180304 n. L2 – Tree Mitigation Plan – 1/29/15 o. L3 – Landscaping Plan – 1/29/15 p. L4 – Landscape Detail – 1/29/15 q. Landscaping & Parking Areas – 1/9/15 r. A1.1 – Architectural Site Plan – 1/26/15 s. A2.1 – Floor Plan Building 1 – 1/26/15 t. A2.2 – Floor Plan Building 2 – 1/26/15 u. A3.1 – Exterior Elevations Building 1 – 12/12/14 v. A3.2 – Exterior Elevations Building 2 – 12/12/14 2. Conditional Use Permit 3. Façade materials and color pallet: The front and side elevations of building 1 & 2 will consist of two (2) complimentary tan/brown earthtone colors shown on the submittal plan as Precast Panels A & C. Precast Panel B will be a greyish/black panel made up of either revealed panels, or thin brick panels which will add architectural detail at the window locations. The rear elevation will consist of two (2) different colored precast panels to match Precast Panels A & C., plus an optional 3rd door color, which will all be similar to the colors used on the front of the building. 4. Written Statement consisting of pages 1-2 dated 1/26/2015. C. Subject to the conditions and modifications contained herein, the Development Plan Documents represent the nature, scope and configuration of the development Project which the Developer is requesting the City to approve. D. The PUD-Master Plan and the Conditional Use Permit Documents indicate that the Property will be developed in a single phase comprised of two buildings, one of 43,300 square feet and the other of 50,000 square feet. 2. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. On the 4th day of February, 2015, the City Planning Commission reviewed the application at a public hearing and after considering the application, the reports and comments of the City’s staff and consultants, reports and comments of the Developer, and other public comments; and, subject to conditions, recommended approval of the PUD Master Plan and Final Plan; and the Conditional Use Permit. 180304 3. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. On the 23rd day of February, 2015, the City Council reviewed the application, the reports and recommendations of the City’s staff and consultants, the reports and requests of the Developer, and the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and has approved the PUD Master Plan, Final Plan and the Conditional Use Permit, all subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. In consideration of the City’s development approvals, in compliance with the City’s development regulations, and in consideration of the undertakings expressed herein, the parties agree: A. PUD – Master Plan/Final Plan. 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall obtain a building permit within one year of the PUD approval or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval’s expiration date. Extension requests must be submitted in writing to the City at least 45 days prior to the expiration date. 3. That the development agreement and conditional use permit (CUP) shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The development agreement and CUP shall be executed prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 4. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the PUD Development Agreement. 5. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 6. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building 180304 permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 7. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be held by the City for two years after installation of landscaping and used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of landscaping, or developer default. 8. That the proposed project may require permits, including, but not limited to, MPCA-NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MPCA- Sanitary Sewer Extension, Ramsey County and City Right of Way, and City Grading and Erosion Control permits. Copies of all issued permits shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any development permits. 9. That the final plans shall be subject to approval by the Building Official and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. That upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. That the final plans shall be revised to meet the standards as outlined by the Assistant City Engineer in the memo dated 2-19-15. 13. That the final Lighting and Photometric Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. That the applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. 15. That City Staff shall be allowed access to the development on an annual basis to determine the amount of wholesaling and warehousing uses in each building. 16. The Developer shall notify the owner of the neighboring medical building of their construction schedule and any changes. 17. The Developer shall work with the owner of the neighboring medical building regarding additional screening of the loading dock area along Building 2 and offer four (4) tree plantings to be installed on their property at Developer’s cost. 18. The Developer shall provide additional façade treatments on the south façade (loading dock area) of Building 2 similar to the north façade but not requiring use of the anodized aluminum materials. 180304 B. Conditional Use Permit. 1. Wholesaling and warehousing uses are allowed in either building up to 50% of the gross floor area of the building in which it is located. 2. That City Staff shall be allowed access to the development on an annual basis to determine the amount of wholesaling and warehousing uses in each building. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. No partnership or joint ventures established between the parties hereto by or under this Agreement or any agreement referenced herein. 6. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respected successors and assigns, including without limitation, any and all future and present owners, tenants, occupants, licensee, mortgagee and any other parties with any interest in the Property. Should the Developer convey any lot or lots in the project to a third party, the City and the owner of that lot or those lots may amend the Master Plan or other city approvals for development or use of those lots without the approval or consent of the Developer or other lot owners in the Project. Private agreements between the owners of lots within the Project for shared service or access and related matters necessary for the efficient use of the project shall be the responsibility of the lot owners and shall not bind or restrict City authority to approve applications from any lot owner in the Project. 7. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Upon sale or conveyance of any portion of the Property, the transferee shall be liable for all obligations of the Developer which relates to the portions of the Property so transferred and the transferor shall be automatically released from any further obligation, liability, right or responsibility in respect to such transfer. Moreover, nothing herein shall be construed to create a cause of action on behalf of the City against the Developer with respect to its business operations beyond the obligations set forth herein relating to the development and maintenance of the Property. 180304 8. RECORDING OF DOCUMENT. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded in the office of the Ramsey County Recorder or Registrar of Titles with proof thereof shown to the City prior to the issuance of any permits there under. 9. GOVERNING LAW. The City and the Developer agree that the laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the undersigned parties and performance under it without regard to principals of conflicts of law. The language of this Agreement is and shall be deemed a result of negotiations among the parties and the respective legal counsel and shall not be strictly extrude for or against any party. Each party agrees that any action arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be brought solely in the courts of the State of Minnesota, Second Judicial District, or the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. 10. EVENT OF DEFAULT. The occurrence of any of the following shall be considered an “event of default” and the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement: 1. Failure of the Developer to comply with any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; and 2. Failure of the Developer to comply with any applicable ordinance or statute with respect to the development of the Property. 11. REMEDIES. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the City, in addition to any other remedy which may be available to it, shall be permitted to do any of the following: 1. City may make advances or take other steps to cure the default, and, where necessary, enter the Property for that purpose. The Developer shall pay all sums so advanced, or expenses incurred by the City, upon demand, with interest from the dates of such advances or expenses at the rate of 10% per annum or the maximum amount permitted by law if less than 10%. If no action taken by the City pursuant to this section shall be deemed to relieve the Developer from curing any such defaults to the extent that it is not cured by the City or from any other default hereunder. The City shall not be obligated, by virtue of the existence or exercise of this right, to perform any such act or cure any such default. The Developer shall save, indemnify, and hold harmless, including reasonable attorney’s fees, the City from liability or other damages which may be incurred as a result of the exercise of the City’s rights pursuant to this section. 180304 2. Obtain an order from a Court of Competent Jurisdiction requiring the Developer to specifically perform its obligations pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 3. Exercise any other remedies which may be available to it, including an action for damages. 4. Withhold the issuance of any building permits and/or prohibit the occupancy of all building which permits have been issued. 5. In addition to the remedies and amounts payable as set forth herein, upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Developer shall pay the City all fees and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, engineering and consultant fees incurred by the City as a result of an event of default, whether or not a lawsuit or action is formally undertaking. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written. 180304 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: ______________________________________ David Grant, Mayor (SEAL) And _____________________________________ Amy Dietl, Deputy Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20___, by David Grant and by Amy Dietl, respectively the Mayor and Deputy Clerk of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota statutory city, on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. __________________________________________ Notary Public 180304 NORTH AMERICAN LAND COMPANY. A Minnesota Limited Liability Company By: ______________________________________ Nicholas S. Roberts, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20___, by Nicholas S. Roberts, the Chief Manager of North American Land Company, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. __________________________________________ Notary Public 180304 ROBERTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC A Minnesota Limited Liability Company By: ______________________________________ Nicholas S. Roberts, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20___, by Nicholas S. Roberts, the Chief Manager of Roberts Management Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. __________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 (JJJ/jmo) City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-001 - Boston Scientific - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-001 Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 5G MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-001 Property Owner: Boston Scientific Corporation Property Location: 4100 Hamline Avenue North Subject: Twelfth Amendment to Master Planned Unit Development Agreement Requested Action Motion to approve the Twelfth Amendment to the Boston Scientific Master Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement, based on the February 23, 2015, City Council approval of Planning Case 15-001. Background On February 23, 2015, the City Council approved Planning Case 15-001 for a Preliminary and Final Plat and a PUD Amendment for the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. The subdivision will create a 15.6 acre parcel at the corner of County Road F and Hamline Avenue North that includes Buildings A, B, and C and Parking Ramp One. Boston Scientific intends to sell this parcel to a new property owner. The remainder of the 78 acre site will continue to function as the Boston Scientific Campus. A PUD Amendment was required to reflect the change in property boundaries and to update the existing Campus Master Plan. The City Attorney has prepared the Twelfth Amendment to the Master PUD Agreement and the document has been reviewed and signed by Boston Scientific (Attachment A). This Agreement will be recorded against Lot 1 and Lot 2. Attachments A. Twelfth Amendment to Master Planned Unit Development Agreement (Reserved for recording) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (Planning Case #15-001) 1. PARTIES. This Amendment is dated the _____ day of ____________, 2015, and is entered into by and between the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and Boston Scientific Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns (“Boston Scientific”). 2. RECITALS. A. On November 12, 2002, the City Council approved a Planned Unit Development entitled “Guidant Campus Master Plan – Prepared by Guidant Corporation for the City of Arden Hills, September, 2002” (“Master Plan”) which guides the future development of property located at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, situated in the City of Arden Hills, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, originally platted as Guidant First Addition and subsequently renamed and now legally described as: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Boston Scientific Campus (“Property”). B. The Master Plan was previously amended on eleven (11) occasions. The last amendment, being the Eleventh Amendment to Master Planned Unit Development Agreement, and recorded on July 25, 2014 with the Ramsey County Recorder as document number A04516823. The Master Plan and all previous amendments run with the land and are binding on successors in interest to Guidant Corporation, including Boston Scientific. C. On January 5, 2015, Boston Scientific submitted an application requesting approval of a 12th Amendment to Master Planned Unit Development Agreement to re-subdivide 1 180589v5 the Property into two separate lots for the purpose of selling Lot 2, comprising approximately 15.6 acres, to reflect changes in the property boundaries as a result of the subdivision, to update the Campus Master Plan, and to create a separate Planned Unit Development for each new Lot. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW. On February 4, 2015, the City Planning Commission reviewed the application at a public hearing and after considering the application, the reports and comments of the City’s staff, the reports and comments of Boston Scientific, and other public comments, and subject to conditions, recommended approval of the 12th Amendment to the Master Planned Unit Development Agreement. 4. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. On February 23, 2015, the City Council reviewed the application, the reports and recommendations of City’s staff, the reports of Boston Scientific, and the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and has approved the 12th Amendment to Master Planned Unit Development Agreement, all subject to the terms and conditions herein contained. 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. A. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit A. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. B. The current and subsequent owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall continue to abide by the conditions of all previous Development Agreements, Master PUD approvals, and subsequent PUD Amendment approvals: subsequent PUD amendments, however, will be applied for, processed and approved separately for the two Lots. C. A PUD Amendment drafted by the City Attorney shall be executed prior to the execution of the Final Plat. D. The PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review shall automatically expire and become void one (1) year after the date on which the Council granted approval if work on the project has not begun. E. Prior to the City signing the Final Plat, Boston Scientific will provide a Shared Management and Maintenance Agreement for a stormwater pond that spans Lots 1 and 2, which agreement must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. F. A Site Plan Review application, including a Landscaping Plan, is required for the modification of the parking area along the Lot 1 and Lot 2 property boundary line and shall be submitted prior to March 1, 2016, or an extension request shall be submitted in writing to the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to that date. G. All necessary City permits for the removal of the existing skyway structure connecting Building B and Building E as depicted on the current Campus Master Plan shall be 2 180589v5 obtained prior to March 1, 2016, or an extension request shall be submitted in writing to the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to that date. H. Future applications for modifications to the stormwater pond, to the boundary line landscaping and improvements, or other shared facilities must be signed by both owners unless specified otherwise in the Shared Management and Maintenance Agreement or other real estate management agreement executed by the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2. I. New addressing of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall be determined upon the sale of Lot 2 per the requirements of the Lake Johanna Fire Department. J. Conditions of Approval Specific to the respective Lots are attached hereto as Exhibit B. 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT/COMPLIANCE. Boston Scientific acknowledges and understands the conditions of approval and agrees to comply with such conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date and year first above written. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures contained on the following pages.] 3 180589v5 SIGNATURE PAGE 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: _____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor (SEAL) By: _____________________________________ Patrick Klaers, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _____________, 2015, by David Grant and by Patrick Klaers, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public 4 180589v5 SIGNATURE PAGE 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION By: __________________________________ Lorne Rothbauer, Its Facilities Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _____________, 2015, by Lorne Rothbauer, the Director of Facilities, for Boston Scientific Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 5 180589v5 EXHIBIT A To 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (Planning Case #-15-001) [Attach Final Plans] 6 180589v5 EXHIBIT B To 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (Planning Case #15-001) Conditions Specific to LOT 2, Boston Scientific 1. New access to Hamline Avenue North shall require approval through the Ramsey County Public Works Department. A right-of-way permit will be required for any construction activity occurring within the County’s right-of-way. 2. Sprinkler and Fire Alarm testing shall be required prior to the occupancy of new tenants in Buildings A, B, or C. 7 180589v5 EXHIBIT B To 12TH AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (Planning Case #15-001) Conditions Specific to LOT 1, Boston Scientific 1. Prior to City approval of a Site Plan Review for Lot 1 that would result in more than an additional 211,940 square feet of new gross building space on Lot 1, the property owner shall be required to complete a traffic study, unless waived by the City Council. 8 180589v5 CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-003 Applicant: Alliant Engineering/CSM Properties Property Location: 4293 Lexington Avenue North (CSM Properties) Request: Site Plan Review and Variance – Parking Lot Expansion Requested Action Motion to approve Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan Review and Variance in order to expand the parking lot area at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the four (4) conditions in the March 30, 2015, Report to the City Council. A Site Plan Review is required for the parking lot modifications and a Variance is required to address the encroachment of the parking lot into the required five (5) foot setback. Background/Overview of Request CSM Corporation owns the Arden Hills Corporate Center located north of the Boston Scientific Campus. The property at 4293 Lexington Avenue North is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. The applicant is proposing to construct an additional twenty-two (22) parking stalls to meet the needs of the existing tenant at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. The proposed stalls are located along the south side of the existing parking lot on this property. A Variance is required in this case because the proposed expansion would bring the parking lot area within 4 feet - 4 inches of the adjacent property line of 4255 Lexington Avenue North. The Zoning Code requires that parking areas including four or more spaces maintain a setback of five feet from adjacent properties. The CSM Corporation is also the owner of the property at 4255 Lexington Avenue North. CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 2 of 6 The applicant has submitted a narrative of the proposed project (Attachment C), a Site Plan depicting the proposed parking lot expansion project (Attachment D), and a preliminary grading plan (Attachment E). Plan Evaluation 1. I-1 Limited Industrial District Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment A. Site Plan Review – Site Plan Approval Required A Site Plan Review is required by the City Code for the reorganization of parking, drives and entrances within any industrial district. The applicant is proposing to construct an additional twenty-two (22) parking stalls to meet the needs of the existing tenant at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. B. Lot Coverage – Meets Requirements The existing and proposed lot coverage calculations do not exceed the standards set within the I-1 Light Industrial Zoning District. The I-1 Zoning District permits maximum lot coverage of 65% for impervious surfaces and a minimum landscape coverage of 35%. C. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan The applicant submitted a Tree Survey and Tree Replacement Plan as part of their tree preservation and mitigation requirements (Attachment D). The following table outlines these numbers and the additional requirements of the tree preservation ordinance pertaining to tree removal and tree mitigation regulations. Total Lot Area: 148,975 Sq. Ft. Existing Conditions Proposed Square Feet % Square Feet % Principal Building 25,908 17.39% 25,908 17.39% Accessory Structure 1,745 1.17% 1,745 1.17% Other Impervious Coverage (i.e. Parking Lot and Sidewalk) 65,329 43.85% 69,194 46.45% Total Impervious Coverage 92,982 62.41% 96,810 65.00% Landscape Coverage 55,993 37.59% 52,165 35.00% CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 3 of 6 Caliper Inches Number of Trees Total Existing Trees 647” 32 10% Permitted Removal 64.7” -- Proposed Removal 77” 6 Trees Preserved 570” 28 Replacement Trees Required* 6.15” --** Replacement Trees Proposed 12.5” 5 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. ** The number of trees required may vary depending on the size of the trees planted by the developer. City Code requires a certain number of caliper inches to be planted. If larger trees are planted then fewer trees would be required. In total five (5) Autumn Blaze Red Maple trees will be planted, equating to 12.5 caliper inches. Based on the proposed tree removal, the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance requires 6.15 caliper inches to be planted on the site. D. Parking – Variance Required The Zoning Code requires that off-street parking areas containing four or more parking spaces must be a minimum of five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. With the proposed expansion, the parking lot area would be located 4 feet – 4 inches from the adjacent property to south. The applicant is requesting a variance in order to encroach into this required setback. 2. Additional Review a. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) reviewed the plans for this request and determined that a RCWD Permit would not be required for the proposed project. b. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and stated that a Grading and Erosion Control Permit is needed for this project. Variance Evaluation Criteria Minnesota State Statute requires municipalities to use a “practical difficulties” standard when evaluating variance requests. In evaluating a variance request, the three-factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character should be used. Minnesota State Statute also states that: “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 4 of 6 general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan”. Therefore, in evaluating variance requests under the state law, in order to find a practical difficulty, cities should adopt findings addressing the following questions: • Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? • Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? • Does the proposal put property to use in a reasonable manner? • Are there unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? • Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the Community? Economic considerations alone cannot constitute a practical difficulty. Conditions may be imposed on granting of variances if those conditions are directly related to and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 15-003 at their regular meeting on March 4, 2015. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment A. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: General Findings 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. That a Site Plan Review is required in order to add or reconfigure parking areas on the site. 3. That a Variance is required in order to allow the encroachment of the new parking area within five (5) feet of an adjoining property line. 4. The properties at 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue North are owned by CSM Corporation. 5. The lot is 148,975 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 655 feet in width, and 220 feet in depth. 6. The property currently consists of a principal building that has a footprint of 25,908 square feet and an accessory structure that is 1,745 square feet in size. 7. Access to the property is provided off of Cummings Park Drive. 8. The Zoning Code requires 210 parking spaces be provided on this property for Business and Professional Offices. 9. The parking lot currently contains 127 parking spaces. 10. After completion of the new parking lot area 149 parking spaces will exist. 11. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 5 of 6 Variance Findings: 12. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique situations when impacts to surrounding properties are minimized. 13. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the reasonable use of commercial or light industrial property. 14. The proposed variance would have no significant impact to the conditions of the site. 15. The proposed variance is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the neighborhood as a whole. 16. The proposed variance does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. Recommendation The findings of fact for the Site Plan Review & Variance support approval. However, if the City Council chooses to deny the application, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 15-003 and unanimously recommends approval (7-0) of a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the March 30, 2015, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following four (4) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of all landscaping and trees prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC- insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping and tree requirements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 3. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 4. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. CONSENT ITEM – 5H City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 6 of 6 Proposed Motion Language 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Approve the proposal with conditions (Recommended Action). 3. Deny the application with reasons for denial. 4. Table for additional information. Notice Although a Site Plan Review does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 6, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 6, 2015, (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The petitioner was notified on February 13, 2015, of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by May 5, 2015 (120 days). The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Draft Planning Commission Minutes – March 4, 2015 B. Planning Commission Report – March 4, 2015 C. Application and Narrative D. Site Plan E. Preliminary Grading Plan F. Aerial Map Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Roberta Thompson called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Roberta Thompson, Commissioners Brent Bartel, Angela Hames, Andrew Holewa, Steven Jones, Phillip Neururer, and Clayton Zimmerman. Absent: None. Also present were: City Planner Ryan Streff and Associate Planner Matthew Bachler APPROVAL OF AGENDA – MARCH 4, 2015 Chair Thompson stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 4, 2015 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Chair Thompson recommended this item be postponed to the April Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-003; Site Plan Review & Variance – 4293 Lexington Avenue North – CSM Properties – No Public Hearing Required City Planner Streff stated that the applicant has requested a Site Plan Review and Variance in order to expand the parking lot area at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. A Site Plan Review is required for the parking lot modifications. A Variance is required to address the encroachment of the parking lot into the required five (5) foot setback. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 2 City Planner Streff commented that CSM Corporation owns the Arden Hills Corporate Center, located north of the Boston Scientific Campus off of Lexington Avenue. The property at 4293 Lexington Avenue North is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. This property is generally positioned north of Cummings Park Drive, south of Cummings Park, east of Hamline Avenue, and west of Lexington Avenue. City Planner Streff explained that the applicant is proposing to construct an additional twenty- two (22) parking stalls to meet the needs of the existing tenant at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. The proposed stalls are located along the south side of the existing parking lot on this property. A Variance is required in this case because the proposed expansion would bring the parking lot area within 4 feet - 4 inches of the adjacent property line of 4255 Lexington Avenue North. The Zoning Code requires that parking areas including four or more spaces maintain a setback of five feet from adjacent properties. The CSM Corporation is also the owner of the property at 4255 Lexington Avenue North. Land Use Plan: Site Data I/O - Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Industrial/Office Zoning: I-1 – Limited Industrial District Current Lot Sizes: 3.42 Acres Topography: Fairly Flat City Planner Streff reviewed the surrounding area, Plan Evaluation and the Variance Evaluation Criteria. City Planner Streff provided the Findings of Fact for review: General Findings 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. That a Site Plan Review is required in order to add or reconfigure parking areas on the site. 3. That a Variance is required in order to allow the encroachment of the new parking area within five (5) feet of an adjoining property line. 4. The properties at 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue North are owned by CSM Corporation. 5. The lot is 148,975 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 655 feet in width, and 220 feet in depth. 6. The property currently consists of a principal building that has a footprint of 25,908 square feet and an accessory structure that is 1,745 square feet in size. 7. Access to the property is provided off of Cummings Park Drive. 8. The Zoning Code requires 210 parking spaces be provided on this property for Business and Professional Offices. 9. The parking lot currently contains 127 parking spaces. 10. After completion of the new parking lot area 149 parking spaces will exist. 11. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. Variance Findings: ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 3 12. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique situations when impacts to surrounding properties are minimized. 13. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the reasonable use of commercial or light industrial property. 14. The proposed variance would have no significant impact to the conditions of the site. 15. The proposed variance is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the neighborhood as a whole. 16. The proposed variance does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. City Planner Streff stated that the findings of fact for the Site Plan Review & Variance support a recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review & Variance, staff recommends the following four (4) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of all landscaping and trees prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping and tree requirements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 3. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. 4. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if a variance was granted to the property allowing for the existing parking shortfall. City Planner Streff commented that a PUD was created which allowed for the parking shortfall on this property. Commissioner Jones questioned if the parcel to the north was owned by the City. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 4 City Planner Streff stated CSM owned this parcel. Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Hames seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan and Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the four (4) conditions in the March 4, 2015, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 1 of 8 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 2015 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-003 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Alliant Engineering/CSM Properties Property Location: 4293 Lexington Avenue North (CSM Properties) Request: Site Plan Review and Variance – Parking Lot Expansion Requested Action The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review and Variance in order to expand the parking lot area at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. A Site Plan Review is required for the parking lot modifications. A Variance is required to address the encroachment of the parking lot into the required five (5) foot setback. Background/Overview of Request CSM Corporation owns the Arden Hills Corporate Center, which consists of the four (4) lots and buildings within this particular development located north of the Boston Scientific Campus off of Lexington Avenue. The property at 4293 Lexington Avenue North is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial District. This property is generally positioned north of Cummings Park Drive, south of Cummings Park, east of Hamline Avenue, and west of Lexington Avenue. The applicant is proposing to construct an additional twenty-two (22) parking stalls to meet the needs of the existing tenant at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. The proposed stalls are located along the south side of the existing parking lot on this property. A Variance is required in this case because the proposed expansion would bring the parking lot area within 4 feet - 4 inches of the adjacent property line of 4255 Lexington Avenue North. The Zoning Code requires that parking areas including four or more spaces maintain a setback of five feet from adjacent properties. The CSM Corporation is also the owner of the property at 4255 Lexington Avenue North. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 2 of 8 The applicant has submitted a narrative of the proposed project (Attachment A), a Site Plan depicting the proposed parking lot expansion project (Attachment B), and a preliminary grading plan (Attachment C). 1. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: I/O - Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Industrial/Office Zoning: I-1 – Limited Industrial District Current Lot Sizes: 3.42 Acres Topography: Fairly Flat 2. Surrounding Area Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Mixed Use Industrial/Office South I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Mixed Use Industrial/Office East I/O - Light Industrial and Office I-1 – Limited Industrial District Mixed Use Industrial/Office West Park & Open Space/Low Density Residential Park & Open Space/ R-1 Single Family Residential Park & Open Space/Single Family Detached Plan Evaluation 1. I-1 Limited Industrial District Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment A. Lot Size & Dimensions – Meets Requirements The property located at 4293 Lexington Avenue North is 148,975 square feet in size. B. Site Plan Review – Site Plan Approval Required A Site Plan Review is required by the City Code for the reorganization of parking, drives and entrances within any industrial Applicable I-1 Lot Requirements 1. Minimum Lot Area (sf.) 30,000 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft., width/depth) 100/130 3. Height (ft.) 35 4. Lot Covered by Structure 30% 5. Minimum Landscape Lot Area 35% 6. Minimum Building Setbacks (ft) Front Yard 55 Rear Yard (Principle) 20 Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 Side Yard Interior - Principal (Minimum/total both yards on lot) 20/40 Side Yard Interior - Accessory 10 Side Yard Corner 50 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 3 of 8 district. The applicant is proposing to construct an additional twenty-two (22) parking stalls to meet the needs of the existing tenant at 4293 Lexington Avenue North. C. Lot Coverage – Meets Requirements The existing and proposed lot coverage calculations do not exceed the standards set within the I-1 Light Industrial Zoning District. The I-1 Zoning District permits maximum lot coverage of 65% for impervious surfaces and a minimum landscape coverage of 35%. D. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan The applicant submitted a Tree Survey and Tree Replacement Plan as part of their tree preservation and mitigation requirements (Attachment B). The following table outlines these numbers and the additional requirements of the tree preservation ordinance pertaining to tree removal and tree mitigation regulations. Caliper Inches Number of Trees Total Existing Trees 647” 32 10% Permitted Removal 64.7” -- Proposed Removal 77” 6 Trees Preserved 570” 28 Replacement Trees Required* 6.15” --** Replacement Trees Proposed 12.5” 5 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. ** The number of trees required may vary depending on the size of the trees planted by the developer. City Code requires a certain number of caliper inches to be planted. If larger trees are planted then fewer trees would be required. Total Lot Area: 148,975 Sq. Ft. Existing Conditions Proposed Square Feet % Square Feet % Principle Building 25,908 17.39% 25,908 17.39% Accessory Structure 1,745 1.17% 1,745 1.17% Other Impervious Coverage (i.e. Parking Lot and Sidewalk) 65,329 43.85% 69,194 46.45% Total Impervious Coverage 92,982 62.41% 96,810 65.00% Landscape Coverage 55,993 37.59% 52,165 35.00% City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 4 of 8 In total five (5) Autumn Blaze Red Maple trees will be planted, equating to 12.5 caliper inches. Based on the proposed tree removal, the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance requires 6.15 caliper inches to be planted on the site. E. Parking – Variance Required Section 1325.06 of Zoning Code states that Business and Professional Offices are required to provide one (1) parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. Based on this criteria, 210 parking spaces are required for the 52,379 square feet of office space located within the building on the property. The current parking lot contains 127 parking spaces. After the proposed parking lot expansion a total of 149 parking spaces would exist. The Zoning Code also requires that off-street parking areas containing four or more parking spaces must be a minimum of five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. With the proposed expansion, the parking lot area would be located 4 feet – 4 inches from the adjacent property to south. The applicant is requesting a variance in order to encroach into this required setback. 2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements The project as proposed is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. 3. Additional Review a. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) reviewed the plans for this request and determined that a RCWD Permit would not be required for the proposed project. b. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and stated that a Grading and Erosion Control Permit is needed for this project. Type/Total Parcel 1 Building Size (sq. ft.) 52,379 Zoning Code 210 Existing Parking 127 Proposed Parking 149 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 5 of 8 Variance Evaluation Criteria On May 5, 2011, the Governor signed into law new variance legislation that changed the review criteria City’s must use when evaluating variance requests. The new law renames the municipal variance standard from “undue hardship” to “practical difficulties,” but otherwise retains the familiar three-factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. Also included is a sentence new to city variance authority that was already in the county statutes: “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan”. Therefore, in evaluating variance requests under the new law, in order to find a practical difficulty, cities should adopt findings addressing the following questions: • Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? • Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? • Does the proposal put property to use in a reasonable manner? • Are there unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? • Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the Community? As was the case before the new legislation took effect, economic considerations alone cannot constitute a practical difficulty. Furthermore, the new law clarifies that conditions may be imposed on granting of variances if those conditions are directly related to and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Findings of Fact Staff offers the following sixteen (16) findings of fact for review: General Findings 1. The property is located in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District. 2. That a Site Plan Review is required in order to add or reconfigure parking areas on the site. 3. That a Variance is required in order to allow the encroachment of the new parking area within five (5) feet of an adjoining property line. 4. The properties at 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue North are owned by CSM Corporation. 5. The lot is 148,975 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 655 feet in width, and 220 feet in depth. 6. The property currently consists of a principal building that has a footprint of 25,908 square feet and an accessory structure that is 1,745 square feet in size. 7. Access to the property is provided off of Cummings Park Drive. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 6 of 8 8. The Zoning Code requires 210 parking spaces be provided on this property for Business and Professional Offices. 9. The parking lot currently contains 127 parking spaces. 10. After completion of the new parking lot area 149 parking spaces will exist. 11. The proposed lot coverage is within the zoning district requirements. Variance Findings: 12. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique situations when impacts to surrounding properties are minimized. 13. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the reasonable use of commercial or light industrial property. 14. The proposed variance would have no significant impact to the conditions of the site. 15. The proposed variance is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the neighborhood as a whole. 16. The proposed variance does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. Recommendation The findings of fact for the Site Plan Review & Variance support a recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review & Variance, staff recommends the following four (4) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of all landscaping and trees prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC- insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping and tree requirements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the approved plan. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 3. That any newly created parking space or parking area shall meet the parking regulations stated in Section 1325.05 of the City Code. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 7 of 8 4. That a Grading and Erosion Control Permit shall be issued by the City before the commencement of any construction, grading or disturbance of soil within the parking lot area. Options 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the four (4) conditions in the March 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15- 003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the March 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North, based on the following findings of fact… 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 15-003 for a Site Plan Review & Variance to expand the existing parking lot at 4293 Lexington Avenue North: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Although a Site Plan Review does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-003 - CSM - Site Plan Review & Variance - Parking Lot\Memos_Reports_15-003 Page 8 of 8 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 6, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 6, 2015, (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The petitioner was notified on February 13, 2015, of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by May 5, 2015 (120 days). The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Application and Narrative B. Site Plan C. Preliminary Grading Plan D. Aerial Map Rezoning Submittal February 11, 2015 Fridley, MN Page 1 of 1 LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue Arden Hills, Minnesota February 11, 2015 ZONING CLASSIFICATION The properties are currently Zoned (I-1) Limited Industrial District. No zoning change is requested. LAND USE EXISTING CONDITIONS There are existing office buildings at 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue with associated parking. The existing tenants are in need of additional parking. PROPOSED PLAN We are proposing to add 22 additional parking stalls at the existing Arden Hills Corporate facility to meet the need of the existing tenants at 4293 and 4255 Lexington Avenue. The proposed stalls are located along the south side of existing parking lot of the 4293 Lexington Avenue Parcel. Zoning Ordinance 1325.06, Subd. 1 Off-Public Street Parking, E. Joint Facilities; allows for joint parking facilities and over common lot lines between the lots involved in the joint parking. The proposed increase in impervious surface is 3,828 square feet. Since the increased impervious surface is less than 10,000 square feet, no review or permits are required by the Rice Creek Watershed District, per Rule C, 2, c. The City Grading and Erosion Control Permit will be submitted by the contractor at time of permit. TIMING/PHASING Construction is anticipated to begin and be completed in May 2015. CONCLUSION The developer seeks approval for the 22 additional parking stalls in order to retain the existing employers/tenants at their Arden Hills Corporate Facility. We have used thoughtful site design to better utilize the property. Variance to reduce the parking setback by 0.6’, from 5’ to 4.4’. 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. No. The variance has been requested to provide for adequate parking to meet the need of the existing tenants/market demand. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner The plight is due to growth of the existing tenants and the desire to keep them in the existing facility and the City of Arden Hills. 3. The deviation from the Ordinance with any attached conditions will still be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. Yes. The deviation from the Ordinance will still be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. We are proposing to decrease the parking setback 0.6’. 4. The variance will not create a land use not permitted in the zone. No. There is no proposed land use change. 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the City. No. The deviation of the parking setback is very small and is not visible from adjacent property which is not owned by the applicant. 6. The variance is not for economic reasons alone. No. Due to the existing parcel limited size a variance is being requested to provide for parking to meet the need of the existing tenants and to keep them in the existing facilities and the City of Arden Hills. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 200.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet200.00100.00 Notes Enter Map Description Legend City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries Lakes - Neighboring Counties Airports This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 600.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet600.00300.00 Notes Enter Map Description Legend City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries Airports Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: John Anderson, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Lexington Avenue and County Road F No Parking Resolution Requested Action Adopt Resolution 2015-022 restricting parking on Lexington Avenue and County Road F. Background/Discussion Ramsey County is planning to improve the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road F Since the proposed street section is not wide enough to support on street parking on either side, MnDOT requires a resolution from the City banning parking in order to utilize County State Aid funding. Attached is Resolution 2015-022, prepared in the format that MnDOT suggests, stating the City will ban on street parking on the west side of Lexington Avenue from County Road F to Cummings Park Drive and on County Road F from Lexington Avenue to Innovation Way. Staff would recommendation adoption of Resolution 2015-022. Attachment Attachment A: Resolution 2015-022 CONSENT ITEM – 5I MEMORANDUM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-022 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NO-PARKING PROVISION FOR LEXINGTON AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD F WHEREAS, the Ramsey County has planned the improvement of Lexington Avenue and County Road F and WHEREAS, the Ramsey County will be expending County Aid Funds on the improvements of these streets, and WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street and approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid Street must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: by the Council of the City of Arden Hills, that the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the west side of Lexington Avenue from County Road F to Cummings Park Drive and on County Road F from Lexington Avenue to Innovation Way at all times. ADOPTED by the Council this 30st day of March, 2015. _____________________________ David Grant, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________ Amy Dietl, CITY CLERK CONSENT ITEM – 5J MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Patrick Klaers, City Administrator SUBJECT: Authorization to Advertise to Fill Office Support Vacancy Background At the March 9, 2015, City Council Meeting, the City Council accepted the resignation of Sonja Klingberg, Office Support Specialist. This left a vacancy in the Administrative Services department and staff members are doing what they can to help out for the time being as this position supported all departments. Discussion The Personnel Committee has not met since February 19, 2015, due to scheduling conflicts. Staff would like to advertise and fill this position as summer is coming and with vacation schedules, we will be/and are short staffed as this position also backs up the front counter personnel. We would like to advertise for this position as soon as possible to enable us to fill the vacancy by the end of April or early May. As is our practice in this process, staff has updated the job description to reflect the duties for this position and a draft copy is attached. Staff is recommending a change in the position title to accurately reflect the job duties and to help attract an applicant pool with the qualifications needed to assist with the duties of the City Clerk, HR, elections, licensing, etc. To this end, staff recommends changing the title from Office Support Specialist to Deputy City Clerk. This position will continue to provide administrative services to all departments and the salary range will remain the same as the previous position. This revised position will be incorporated into the Position Classification Study that Springsted is completing for the City. Staff Recommendation 1. A motion for authorization to advertise for the position of Deputy Clerk for the City of Arden Hills. Attachments Attachment A: Deputy Clerk Job Description 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS POSITION DESCRIPTION Position Title: Office Support SpecialistDeputy Clerk Department: Finance and Administration Accountable to: City Clerk Positions Supervised: None Status: Regular Full Time <DATE>March 2015 PRIMARY OBJECTIVES Performs intermediate skilled administrative support work providing a variety of routine and complex clerical and administrative support assistance, and related duties as apparent or assigned. Work is performed under the limited supervision of the City Clerk. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential function satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION Prepares various types of correspondence including press letters, memos, reports, press releases, City Council Packets, Legal Notices, promotional materials, etc. Provides administrative clerical support to all departments as needed. Compiles, prepares, and distributes department-specific agenda packets, and supporting material, and assists the City Clerk with minutes (this may include taking minutes at meetings). Assists the City Clerk with the issuance of licenses and answers questions related to the process. Creates and maintains files and records to ensure City information is complete, accurate and current. Creates databases and enters department data on the computer in order to maintain and generate accurate computer inquiries and reports. Assists City staff with maintaining the City’s web site, intranet, and social media sites. Prepares promotional flyers as directed by Parks and Recreation Manager.Assists with Recreation department with recreation program flyers, brochures, marketing materials and registrations. Assists the City Clerk with the Election process. Assists with the coordination of documents for scanning into records retention software. Provides backup to Customer Service Representative I by answering phone calls, answering questions from the public, or routing calls as appropriate. 2 Generates permits and answers questions related to permits and process. Assists City Clerk and Administrative Services Director with Human Resource processes and maintains the confidential nature of the items. Processes payroll input and keeps files relating to payroll and worker’s compensation and other reporting criteria. Assists the Finance department with utility billing functions and accounts payable input. Serves as back-up Customer Service Representative I as needed. Assists Planner with file maintenance. Assists other staff as necessary. EDUCATION and/or EXPERIENCE High school diploma or GEDAssociates/Technical degree with coursework in business, or related field and moderate consideratble experience in technical training, IT, office support, word processing, or equivalent combination of education and experience. Municipal experience desired. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES General knowledge of the functions and activities of the City; general knowledge of standard office and customer service procedures; ability to read and interpret documents such as operating and maintenance instructions, policies, and regulations, ordinances, codes, contracts, and procedure manuals; ability to make arithmetic computations using whole numbers, fractions and decimals; ability to compute rates, ratios, and percentages; ability to prepare reports and correspondence; ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing; ability to understand and follow written and oral directions; ability to operate standard office equipment including related hardware and software; ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with associates and the general public. PHYSICAL DEMANDS This work requires the occasional exertion of up to 50 pounds of force; work regularly requires sitting, using hands to finger, handle or feel and repetitive motions, frequently requires speaking or hearing and occasionally requires standing, walking, reaching with hands and arms and lifting; work has standard vision requirements; vocal communication is required for expressing or exchanging ideas by means of the spoken word; hearing is required to perceive information at normal spoken word levels; work requires preparing and analyzing written or computer data, operating machines and observing general surroundings and activities; work has no exposure to environmental conditions; work is generally in a moderately noisy location (e.g. business office, light traffic). SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Specific job-related software training.Certified Municipal Clerk certification or ability to attain within four years of hire. SELECTION GUIDELINES Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference c heck; job related tests may be required. The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 3 ___________________________________________________________________ NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY The City of Arden Hills does not discriminate on the basis of handicapped status in the admission or access to or treatment or employment in its programs and activities. __________________________________________________________________ CONSENT ITEM – 5K MEMORANDUM DATE:March 30, 2015 TO:Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM:Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT:Motion to Authorize City Staff to Begi n Summe r Work Hours on May 26, 2015 , and Conclude on September 4, 2015 Overview City staff is seeking City Council authorization to b egin s ummer work hours on May 26, 2015 , and conclude on September 4, 2015. Background For many years, the City changed its hours to “summer hours” after Memorial Day. The summer hours schedule enables extended hours of City services for construction contractors and residents who have construction projects or other city business. Traditional Hours Proposed Summer Hours City Hall Staff 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday – Friday 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday – Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Friday Maintenance Facility Staff 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday – Friday 6:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday – Thursday 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on Friday Recommendation Motion by the City Council to authorize City staff to b egin summer work hours on May 26, 2015 , and conclude on September 4, 2015. PUBLIC HEARING – 7A MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Susan Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk SUBJECT: Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Background: Delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated February 20, 2015, were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by March 20, 2015. Utility accounts with an unpaid delinquent balance after March 20, 2015, would be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property taxes payable in 2016. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an eight percent penalty. A list of remaining delinquent utility accounts, as of March 26, 2015, is attached. The City will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the respective properties. Recommended Action: Motion to approve Resolution 2015-025 certifying the attached list of delinquent utility accounts to Ramsey County. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution No. 2015-025 Attachment B: List of Delinquent Utility Accounts CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-025 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING QUARTERLY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT UTILITIES WHEREAS, the amount to be specially assessed for DELINQUENT UTILITIES has been duly calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Minnesota Statues; and WHEREAS, notices have been duly mailed as required by law; and WHEREAS, said proposed assessments have at all times since their filling been open for public inspection, and an opportunity has been given to all interest parties to present objections if any, to the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, there were no oral or written objections received. 1. The amounts so calculated and set forth in said notices are hereby levied against the respective parcels of land described therein, and 2. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as special assessments for each of said parcels of land and the assessments together with an additional penalty of eight percent (8%) of the original unpaid amount, inclusive of any previous delinquency penalty, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the City Administrator be authorized and directed to transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll to be extended upon the property tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall collect said special assessments with taxes levied in 2015, payable in 2016: ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ____________________________________ ATTEST: David Grant, MAYOR __________________________________________ Amy Dietl, CITY CLERK Property ID Prior Cert Customer Name Property Address Utility Arrears 8% Cert Fee Total Certified 163023340015 X Wayne Erickson 4627 Highway 10 157.68 12.61 170.29 213023140006 Caren Cushing 4401 Old Highway 10 117.28 9.38 126.66 213023140007 X Joan Carlson 4375 Old Highway 10 117.28 9.38 126.66 213023410051 X Mary Fresonke 1681 Brueberry Lane 156.34 12.51 168.85 223023110063 John Berg 4510 Pleasant Drive 267.87 21.43 289.30 223023110072 X Monday Inc 1184 Highway 96 W 164.94 13.20 178.14 223023120013 X Robert Besser 1307 Karth Lake Circle 324.75 25.98 350.73 223023210050 Andrew Soderholm 1389 Arden View Drive 217.55 17.40 234.95 223023210086 Mark Wilson 1430 Arden View Drive 157.50 12.60 170.10 223023210117 X John Herber 1450 Arden View Drive 160.90 12.87 173.77 223023230016 X Karen J Braaten 1528 McClung Drive 249.76 19.98 269.74 223023230048 X Marie Love 1528 Royal Hills Drive 322.51 25.80 348.31 223023240195 X David Elias 4384 Arden View Court 175.29 14.02 189.31 223023240240 X Joseph Ordos 4412 Arden View Court 167.28 13.38 180.66 223023240248 X Shardae Okeleye 4416 Arden View Court 168.39 13.47 181.86 223023240278 X Thomas Simon 4445 Arden View Court 447.22 35.78 483.00 223023240283 X Mary Speggen 4463 Arden View Court 175.22 14.02 189.24 223023240288 Elizabeth Vieyra 4466 Arden View Court 166.14 13.29 179.43 223023240326 X Jane Larson 4370 Arden View Court 199.34 15.95 215.29 223023240335 X Di d C h i t f f 4334 A d Vi C t 190 16 15 21 205 37 MARCH 30, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-025 UTILITY ACCOUNTS DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 223023240335 X David Christoffersen 4334 Arden View Court 190.16 15.21 205.37 223023310011 Kasandra Knudson 1388 Colleen Avenue 152.23 12.18 164.41 223023310019 X Daniel Yaman 1423 Colleen Avenue 267.38 21.39 288.77 223023310051 James Petrykowski 1439 Indian Oaks Court 66.42 5.31 71.73 223023320035 X Patrick Haik 1550 Briarknoll Circle 213.68 17.09 230.77 223023320070 X Steve Mikkelsen 1478 Dawn Circle 143.78 11.50 155.28 223023330015 X Dustin Foghe 4149 Norma Avenue 197.34 15.79 213.13 223023340011 X Mike & Molley Redden 1365 Eide Circle 385.59 30.85 416.44 223023340036 X Mary Beuning 4101 Hamline Avenue N 661.61 52.93 714.54 223023340047 X Gregory Wagner 4101 Gale Circle 165.86 13.27 179.13 223023340051 X William & Pam Ross 4123 Norma Circle 262.39 20.99 283.38 223023420032 Maxine & Karl Oelker 1286 Wyncrest Lane 378.19 30.26 408.45 273023340029 X Margaret Brunner 1387 County Road E W 250.08 20.01 270.09 283023120048 X Scott Heineman 1707 Valentine Avenue 180.79 14.46 195.25 283023120052 X Gene Erickson 1761 Lake Valentine Road 236.91 18.95 255.86 283023130051 Angela Hames 1812 Venus Avenue 186.21 14.90 201.11 283023240021 Richard Malecha 1822 Venus Avenue 263.92 21.11 285.03 283023310009 Jerrold Ford 3810 New Brighton Road 188.04 15.04 203.08 283023320045 X David Laurion LTD 3820 Cleveland Avenue #600 72.73 5.82 78.55 283023330011 Zdenek Kuhn 1971 Thom Drive 185.29 14.82 200.11 283023410038 X Paul Markegard 3757 McCracken Lane 274.60 21.97 296.57 283023440022 X Paul Harrington 1683 Chatham Avenue 346.10 27.69 373.79 333023110036 Dave Moberg 1611 Lake Johanna Blvd 389.99 31.20 421.19 333023120003 Charles Mertensotto 3491 Lake Johanna Blvd 171.05 13.68 184.73 333023130003 Bradley Huckle 3453 Lake Johanna Blvd 235.56 18.84 254.40 333023240027 X Kimberly Berscheid 1840 Grant Road 245.11 19.61 264.72y Property ID Prior Cert Customer Name Property Address Utility Arrears 8% Cert Fee Total Certified MARCH 30, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-025 UTILITY ACCOUNTS DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 333023240032 X Courtney McCloskey 1876 Grant Road 256.62 20.53 277.15 333023240094 X Gregory Weeks 1873 Stowe Avenue 181.51 14.52 196.03 333023240108 X Paul Trites 1850 Indian Place 196.32 15.71 212.03 333023320003 X Judie Prayfrock 1950 Stowe Avenue 294.96 23.60 318.56 333023320008 X Todd McDonald 2000 Stowe Avenue 264.08 21.13 285.21 333023330034 X Robert Morrissette 2028 Edgewater Avenue 171.54 13.72 185.26 333023330083 X Catherine Callahan 2009 County Road D W 272.84 21.83 294.67 333023340019 Lee Osterberg 3211 Lake Johanna Blvd 205.96 16.48 222.44 333023340020 X Michael Johnson 3223 Lake Johanna Blvd 242.90 19.43 262.33 333023340066 X Todd Rose 1921 Glenpaul Avenue 227.28 18.18 245.46 333023340099 X Jenny Skowronek 1921 County Road D W 187.22 14.98 202.20 333023420002 Steve Schmidt 3352 Lake Johanna Blvd 212.70 17.02 229.72 333023420038 X Candace McCloskey 3290 Lake Johanna Blvd 198.30 15.86 214.16 343023140062 X Chad Eiswald 1150 Benton Way 226.03 18.08 244.11 343023210013 Brett Dallmann 3564 Snelling Avenue N 173.56 13.88 187.44 343023210016 X Sharon Davies 1437 Arden Place 181.49 14.52 196.01 343023210066 X Scott Miles 1421 Skiles Lane 499.45 39.96 539.41 343023210077 X Gary Findell 1401 Skiles Lane 210.72 16.86 227.58 343023220035 X Michael Aamoth 3550 Ridgewood Road 176.84 14.15 190.99 343023230017 Gl d iH 1532 A d Pl 222 23 17 78 240 01343023230017Geraldine Hagen 1532 Arden Place 222.23 17.78 240.01 343023310015 X Ellen Campbell 3354 Snelling Avenue N 145.41 11.63 157.04 343023310046 X Joann Kulman 1468 Bussard Court 117.28 9.38 126.66 343023330050 X Renae Peterschick 3130 Ridgewood Road 168.87 13.51 182.38 343023410055 X Christopher Whiting 1171 Carlton Drive 417.66 33.41 451.07 343023420028 Lake Josephine House LLC 1232 Ingerson Court 271.73 21.74 293.47 343023420030 X Kristine Botelho 1270 Ingerson Road 764.09 61.13 825.22 343023420040 X Bryan & Kristin Jones 1305 Tiller Lane 250.87 20.07 270.94 343023420053 X David Neuberger 3330 Dunlap Street N 149.34 11.95 161.29 343023440077 X Todd Spalding 3205 Lexington Avenue N 171.18 13.69 184.87 Total 17,283.23 1,382.66 18,665.89 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Amy Dietl, City Clerk SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Transfer of Great China Liquor License Background/Discussion Lhasa Café LLC, dba Great China, has requested to transfer its on-sale wine and Sunday liquor license due to new ownership of the restaurant. The new owners (Tenzin Wangyaz, Jampa Tender, and Sangya Dhondup) officially closed on the purchase of Great China, located at 3547 Lexington Avenue N, on March 13, 2015. Staff is in receipt of all the necessary paperwork and associated fees, and background checks have been successfully completed by the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office. In addition to holding a public hearing tonight, the on-sale wine and Sunday liquor license application is also being presented for approval. All required information will be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement upon approval of the license by the City Council. Recommendation Hold a public hearing to receive input regarding the transfer of an on-sale wine and Sunday liquor license for Great China, located at 3547 Lexington Avenue North, Arden Hills, Minnesota. In addition, consider approval of the transfer of an on-sale wine and Sunday liquor license to Great China, located at 3547 Lexington Avenue North, Arden Hills, Minnesota. PUBLIC HEARINGS – 7B MEMORANDUM NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 1 of 13 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-004 Applicant: Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC Property Location: 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 Request: Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Valentine Bluff Requested Action Motion to approve the Valentine Bluff redevelopment project in Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment in order to subdivide the two (2) parcels of property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2, based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the nineteen (19) conditions in the March 30, 2015, Report to the City Council. Background Landmark of Arden Hills has a purchase agreement with Bethel University for approximately 4.77 acres of land consisting of two contiguous parcels at 1941 and 1901 County Road E2. The property at 1941 County Road E2 is the site of the former Ramsey County library, which closed in December of 2010. The Minnesota Baptist Conference occupied the facility at 1901 County Road E2 for a number of years beginning in the early 1970s, but this structure is also currently vacant. The applicant is requesting approval for a project that would result in the redevelopment of both properties for seven (7) single-family homes. The property at 1941 County Road E2 is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is guided for Public Institutional uses in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The adjacent property at 1901 County Road E2 is now zoned N-B Neighborhood Business and is also guided for Neighborhood NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 2 of 13 Business uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is bordered to the north and east by a system of wetlands within Tony Schmidt Regional Park, managed by Ramsey County. Generally, the topography of the properties is relatively flat around where the existing structures are located, but slopes down more significantly along the northern and eastern edges of the site. Small wetland areas are present in the far northeast and southeast corners of the site and are currently protected by easements held by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has a sixty-eight (68) foot wide easement across the western portion of the 1941 County Road E2 property for the purpose of a future trail connection through the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park. Project Proposal and Process 1. Project Description The site is approximately 4.77 gross acres in size and located near the intersection of New Brighton Road and County Road E2 and bordered by Tony Schmidt Regional Park to the north. The site is comprised of two contiguous parcels, both of which have existing structures on them that would be demolished as part of the project. Three separate driveways on County Road E2 currently provide access to the properties. After accounting for the right-of-way area that extends into County Road E2 and the flood plain/wetlands areas located on the site, 4.54 acres of net buildable area exists on the site. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the site into seven (7) single-family lots. In this case, the applicant is proposing four (4) driveways from County Road E2 in order to provide access to the residential lots. Limiting driveways from County Road E2 is accomplished by incorporating shared access from the County roadway for six of the proposed lots. The plans indicate that every other property would share an access with the neighboring property, except the easternmost lot would have its own individual access from County Road E2. In addition to the Preliminary & Final Plat for the subdivision, a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment are being requested. Both properties would be rezoned to the R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. In order to rezone the properties, the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to reflect the new Very Low Density Residential land use for the site. The applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed redevelopment in greater detail and why the overall proposal is within the public interest (Attachment C). A complete plan set, including the Preliminary & Final Plat and Tree Preservation Plan, has also been submitted (Attachment D). NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 3 of 13 Planning Case 15-004 includes three (3) requests: 1. Preliminary & Final Plat. 2. Rezoning to amend the zoning designation for 1941 County Road E2 and 1901 County Road E2 to R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the 2030 Future Land Use Map to classify 1941 and 1901 County Road E2 as Very Low Density Residential land use. Plan Evaluation 1. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan lays out the future land uses that are anticipated for all properties within the City. Based on the future land uses, the City can plan for improvements, anticipate infrastructure needs, and create appropriate land use regulations. The City’s Zoning Code identifies specific zoning districts through which the land uses and goals in the Comprehensive Plan can be implemented. The zoning cannot conflict with the future land use designation. When there is a conflict between a city’s comprehensive plan and a zoning code, the city is required to amend the zoning code to comply with the comprehensive plan, unless the city approves an amendment to the comprehensive plan. The Metropolitan Council has the final determination as to whether to allow a CPA or not, though they provide great deference to the City as long as the proposed land use change does not have a negative impact on a regional system (i.e. transportation, sanitary sewer, and regional parks). A city has broad discretion when reviewing whether to rezone a property or amend its Comprehensive Plan. Questions to consider include whether or not the proposed project forwards the broader goals and vision for the City? Would the rezoned property allow for a better development than the current zoning would permit? Is the proposed zoning district appropriate to that particular location? Would the proposed change forward the goals of the comprehensive plan? The request includes the rezoning of property from R-1 Single Family Residential (1941 County Road E2) and N-B Neighborhood Business (1901 County Road E2) to R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District. The official Zoning Map of the City would be updated to reflect this change in zoning if the project is approved. As part of the CPA for the Valentine Bluff project, a change in land use designation from Public Institutional (1941 County Road E2) and Neighborhood Business (1901 County Road E2) to Very Low Density Residential at approximately 1.54 units per acre is being requested. The City’s 2030 Future Land Use Map would be amended to re-designate the property to reflect the change in land use classification. The Very Low Density Residential land use category allows for development at a net density of 1.5 to 3 units per acre. Net density is defined as the number of dwelling units per acre of land when the acreage involved includes only land for residential uses and excludes arterial street rights of way, wetlands and water features, and other publicly dedicated improvements, such as parks and trails. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 4 of 13 If the City approves the CPA, one of the conditions of approval will be that the project is contingent on final approval from the Metropolitan Council. The request for the Future Land Use Map amendment will need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the City. The Metropolitan Council then has 60 days to review the application, though due to the small size of the project and the lack of negative impacts, the City will be requesting a shortened review timeline of 14 days. Once the Metropolitan Council completes their review, they will notify the City of their decision. If the CPA is approved, the applicant can move forward with filing the Final Plat and applying for development permits. The City must also allow adjacent governments, affected special districts, and affected school districts up to 60 days to review the comprehensive plan amendment. This waiting period allows interested parties to review and comment on the amendment before Metropolitan Council review. However, the Metropolitan Council may prescribe a shorter review and comment period for “minor plan amendments” or may waive the review and comment period if a minor plan amendment involves lands that are not contiguous to other local governmental units. 2. Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations Review A. Street Plan & Streets All seven (7) lots will have access from County Road E2 through four (4) access points. Limiting driveways from County Road E2 is accomplished by incorporating shared access from the County roadway. Every other property would share an access with the neighboring property, except the easternmost lot would have its own individual access from County Road E2. All other requirements pertaining to street access, driveway locations and the finished grade of these facilities are met by the proposed plans. B. Easements City subdivision regulations require twelve (12) foot wide utility and drainage easements dedicated to the City along the right-of-way and centered on common lot lines. The plat includes twelve (12) foot utility and drainage easements that are centered on the common lot lines throughout the development and a twelve (12) foot easement along the County Road E2 right-of-way and along the northern property line adjacent to Tony Schmidt Regional Park. The easements in these areas meet the City’s subdivision regulations. All utility and drainage easements will be dedicated to the public as required by the Subdivision Code. In addition, a sixty-eight (68) foot park, trail, and recreational easement has been provided by the applicant to the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department for the purpose of a future trail connection through the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park. This easement area is located across the western portion of proposed Lot 1. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 5 of 13 C. Park Dedication The Subdivision Ordinance requires developers of subdivisions to dedicate to the public a reasonable percentage of the tract to be developed. Section 1130.08 Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance indicates that for a subdivision that results in new dwelling units less than two units per acre, the applicants shall dedicate six percent of the buildable land area in the subdivision or pay a park dedication fee of six percent of the property’s land value. The City Attorney has indicated that a park dedication based on the purchase price of the two properties is appropriate in this Planning Case. The current purchase agreement between Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC (Developer/Purchaser), and Bethel University (Owner/Seller) indicates a purchase price of $856,000 for the two properties. Based on the purchase price the park dedication fee would be $51,360. D. Required Improvements – Meets Requirements All other required improvements, including sewer, water, utilities, and driveway connections to County Road E2 will be constructed in accordance with the City’s Subdivision Code. 3. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review Section 1320 – District Provisions (R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District) A. Lot Area & Dimensions The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots. As proposed, Lot 1 has a size of 44,483 square feet and Lots 2-7 have a size of 27,202 square feet. The Zoning Code requires a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet in the R2 District. The Code also requires individual lots in the R-2 Zoning District to have a street frontage of at least 85 feet, and a lot depth of at least 120 feet. As indicated by the applicant and reflected on the submitted plans all lots meet the minimum width 85 feet and minimum depth of 120 feet. Lot Total Lot Area Square Feet Width (Feet) Depth (Feet) Zoning Code 11,000 85 120 1 44,483 139 320 2-7 27,202 85 320 NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 6 of 13 C. Building Coverage and Landscaped Lot Area The applicants have submitted a site plan that indicates proposed building pads for each lot. The building pads reflect the typical area of each lot that a home would be built upon. Based on a measurement of the proposed building pads, each lot can be constructed to meet the City’s required building coverage maximum and landscaped lot area minimums. The maximum lot coverage for impervious surfaces is 35% and the minimum landscape coverage is 65% in the R-2 Zoning District. D. Building Height The maximum building height in the R-2 District is 35 feet. Homes constructed on this site would not exceed the City’s height requirements. E. Density The maximum density allowed by the Zoning Code within the R-2 District is 5 units per net acre. There are 4.54 buildable acres on this property. The construction of seven (7) single- family units would result in a net density of 1.54 units per acre. The City’s Comprehensive Plan currently sets the minimum density allowed for new development at 1.5 units per acre. The land use classification of Very Low Density is defined as 1.5 to 3 units per acre. If the proposed development is approved the City will reclassify this property in the 2030 Future Land Use Map as Very Low Density. F. Setbacks The minimum building setbacks in the R-2 District are 40 feet in the front yard, 30 feet in the rear yard, and 5 feet minimum in a side yard, with both sides required to add up to 15 feet. All setback requirements are being met by the proposed Valentine Bluff development. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 7 of 13 Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Tree Preservation The applicant submitted a Tree Survey and Tree Replacement Plan as part of their tree preservation and mitigation requirements (Attachment D). The following table outlines the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance pertaining to tree removal and mitigation. Caliper Inches Number of Trees Total Existing Trees 1,725 98 10% Permitted Removal 172.5 -- Proposed Removal 546.5 31 Trees Preserved 1,178.5 67 Replacement Trees Required* 187 --** Replacement Trees Proposed 272.5 109 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. ** The number of trees required may vary depending on the size of the trees planted by the developer. City Code requires a certain number of caliper inches to be planted. If larger trees are planted then fewer trees would be required. Trees proposed to be planted will consist of desirable and native tree species such as Linden, Maple, Hackberry, Locust, Birch, Oak, and mixed types of evergreen trees. The applicant has developed the lots in such a way to preserve as many of the highest quality trees as possible. In total 109 trees will be planted, equating to 272.5 caliper inches. Based on the proposed tree removal, the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance requires 187 caliper inches to be planted on the site. 4. Traffic Study A traffic study for this site was originally conducted back in December of 2014, for the Valentine Cove development proposal. The new proposal for Valentine Bluff indicates that lots would have direct access to County Road E2. The updated list of conclusions and recommendations provided by SRF Consulting regarding the Valentine Bluff development has been provided in Attachment H. The complete traffic study from December of 2014 has been provided in Attachment I. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 8 of 13 6. Additional Review A. Building Official & Fire Marshal The Building Official and Fire Marshal have reviewed the application and do not have any objections to the proposed project. All final plans will be subject to the Building Official and Fire Marshal’s approval prior to the issuance of any permits. B. Public Works Director & City Engineer The Public Works Director and City Engineer have reviewed the plans for the Valentine Bluff development project. Comments from the Public Works Department can be found in Attachment E. All final grading and utility plans will be subject to the approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any development permits. C. Ramsey County Review Ramsey County has reviewed the application for Valentine Bluff and has provided comments to City staff. The County indicated that they do not have any objections to the proposed project and approval has been given to construct the four (4) access driveways onto County Road E2. The County also stated that any work conducted within the right-of-way requires a permit. C. Rice Creek Watershed District The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is charged with reviewing and approving the drainage plan. The proposal for the Valentine Bluff development has been submitted to the RCWD, and they did issue a conditional approval upon receipt of changes (CAPROC) on February 25, 2015 (Attachment F). The changes requested by the RCWD are not expected to impact the plat design. Based on initial comments from the RCWD review, the applicant has included individual infiltration facilities on each lot in order to treat stormwater runoff from the site. These filtration facilities direct stormwater from the front and sides of each lot to the rear or north side of each property where a larger infiltration facility will collect the stormwater before it is released. The infiltration facilities will be maintained by each individual land owner under a maintenance agreement with the RCWD. D. Surrounding Jurisdictions As part of the requirements for amending the City’s Comprehensive Plan, notice of the proposed plan amendment was sent to the adjacent cities, Mounds View School District, NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 9 of 13 Minnesota Department of Transportation, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County as required by the Metropolitan Council. Findings of Fact: The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 15-004 at their regular meeting on March 4, 2015. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment A. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: General Findings: 1. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision is comprised of 4.77 acres. 2. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision property located at 1941 County Road E2 is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and the property located at 1901 County Road E2 is currently zoned N-B Neighborhood Business. 3. The Valentine Bluff subdivision is proposed as R-2 Single & Two Family Residential. 4. The R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District permits up to five (5) units per acre. 5. The proposed Valentine Bluff development is proposed at 1.54 units per acre. 6. The Valentine Bluff subdivision property currently has the land use designations of Public & Institutional and Neighborhood Business in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 7. The applicant is proposing to re-plat the property into seven (7) single-family lots. 8. The applicant is proposing to construct seven (7) single-family homes. 9. No new streets will be constructed as a result of this development. 10. The proposed development requires park dedication. 11. The park dedication requirement for this application is six percent of the land in dedication or a fee of six percent of the purchased price or some combination thereof. The current purchase agreement between Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC (Developer/Purchaser), and Bethel University (Owner/Seller) indicates a purchase price of $856,000 for the two properties. Based on the purchase price the park dedication if paid in a fee would be $51,360. 12. As currently designed the proposed plan is not in conformance with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan in regards to the land use classifications; the property at 1941 County Road E2 is guided for Public & Institutional and the property at 1901 County Road E2 is guided for Neighborhood Business. 13. The development plan would require that both properties be re-zoned to R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District and designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Very Low Density Residential. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 10 of 13 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Findings: 14. The applicant is proposing to amend the City’s Comprehensive Plan to re-designate the land use classifications at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 to Very Low Density Residential in order to permit a density of 1.5 to 3 units per net acre. 15. The development will built at approximately 1.54 units per acre. 16. The proposed land use designation of Very Low Density Residential would be compatible with the adjacent land uses. 17. The proposed redevelopment is a permitted use in the R-2 Residential District. 18. The proposed CPA would advance the City’s goal to promote the development properties that are in keeping with the character of existing and established neighborhoods within the City. 19. The City staff has been in contact with the staff at the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed development and they have indicated their support for the proposed CPA. Recommendation The findings of fact for the Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment support approval. However, if the City Council chooses to deny the application, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 15-004 and unanimously recommends approval (7-0) of the Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Valentine Bluff redevelopment project located at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the March 30, 2015, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following nineteen (19) conditions: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the execution of the Final Plat shall be contingent upon the Metropolitan Council’s approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. That the development agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The development agreement shall be executed prior to execution of the Final Plat. 4. That the Developer shall submit a park dedication, subject to the approval of the City Council, equal to six percent ($51,360) of the total land area, which is currently under a purchase agreement for $856,000. The City shall use the park dedication to expand the City’s parks, trails, and recreation system. 5. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 11 of 13 stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. 6. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 7. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 8. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be held by the City for two years after installation of landscaping and used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of landscaping, or developer default. 9. That the proposed project may require permits, including, but not limited to, MPCA- NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MPCA- Sanitary Sewer Extension, Ramsey County and City Right of Way, and City Grading and Erosion Control permits. Copies of all issued permits shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits. 10. That the final plans shall be subject to approval by the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. That the final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the commencement of any construction on the site. 12. That upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 13. Sanitary sewer and water shall be accepted by the City and ready for hookup prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. That the application shall be required to meet the requirements as outlined in the memo from the City Engineer dated 2/19/15. 15. That all landscaping materials shall be put in place as the approved grading plan is completed with the exception of the required three front yard trees, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant to install at the time each house is constructed. NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 12 of 13 16. That the maintenance agreement between the RCWD and the developer for the stormwater filtration system shall be provided to the City before the issuance of any development permit. 17. That the RCWD Easements on Lot 7 shall be revised to reflect the flood plain limits or provided in writing to indicated that an encroachment is permitted into the easements held by the RCWD. The easement revision or encroachment permit shall be provided to the City and approved by the City Attorney prior to the execution of the final plat. 18. Driveway easements providing for cross access and maintenance agreements shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City Attorney and recorded by the Developer prior to the execution of the final plat. 19. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. Proposed Motion Language 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Approve the proposal with conditions (Recommended Action). 3. Deny the application with reasons for denial. 4. Table for additional information. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin on February 18, 2015, and mailed to all properties within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Resident Comment Staff received an email from Kristine Poelzer (1870 Indian Place) expressing her support of the proposed Valentine Bluff project (Attachment L). Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 26, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 26, 2015, (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The petitioner was notified on February 13, 2015, of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by NEW BUSINESS – 8A City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 13 of 13 May 25, 2015 (120 days). The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Draft Planning Commission Minutes – March 4, 2015 B. Planning Commission Report – March 4, 2015 C. Application and Narrative D. Development Plans E. City Engineer Comments F. RCWD Comments G. Ramsey County Comments H. Traffic Study Update – Valentine Bluff I. Traffic Study – Valentine Cove J. Example Housing Styles K. Aerial Map L. Letter of Support - Poelzer Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Roberta Thompson called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Roberta Thompson, Commissioners Brent Bartel, Angela Hames, Andrew Holewa, Steven Jones, Phillip Neururer, and Clayton Zimmerman. Absent: None. Also present were: City Planner Ryan Streff and Associate Planner Matthew Bachler APPROVAL OF AGENDA – MARCH 4, 2015 Chair Thompson stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 4, 2015 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Chair Thompson recommended this item be postponed to the April Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING CASES B. Planning Case 15-004; Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment – 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 – Public Hearing City Planner Streff stated that the applicant is requesting approval of the Valentine Bluff redevelopment project for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property located at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 in order to subdivide the two (2) parcels into seven (7) single-family lots. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 2 City Planner Streff explained that Landmark of Arden Hills has a purchase agreement with Bethel University for approximately 4.77 acres of land consisting of two contiguous parcels at 1941 and 1901 County Road E2. The property at 1941 County Road E2 is the site of the former Ramsey County library, which closed in December of 2010. The Minnesota Baptist Conference occupied the facility at 1901 County Road E2 for a number of years beginning in the early 1970s, but this structure is also currently vacant. The applicant is requesting approval for a project that would result in the redevelopment of both properties for seven (7) single-family homes. City Planner Streff commented that the property at 1941 County Road E2 is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is guided for Public Institutional uses in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The adjacent property at 1901 County Road E2 is now zoned N-B Neighborhood Business and is also guided for Neighborhood Business uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is bordered to the north and east by a system of wetlands within Tony Schmidt Regional Park, managed by Ramsey County. Generally, the topography of the properties is relatively flat around where the existing structures are located, but slopes down more significantly along the northern and eastern edges of the site. Small wetland areas are present in the far northeast and southeast corners of the site and are currently protected by easements held by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has a sixty-eight (68) foot wide easement across the western portion of the 1941 County Road E2 property for the purpose of a future trail connection through the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park. City Planner Streff indicated that the site is approximately 4.77 gross acres in size and located near the intersection of New Brighton Road and County Road E2 and bordered by Tony Schmidt Regional Park to the north. The site is comprised of two contiguous parcels, both of which have existing structures on them that would be demolished as part of the project. Three separate driveways on County Road E2 currently provide access to the properties. After accounting for the right-of-way area that extends into County Road E2 and the flood plain/wetlands areas located on the site, 4.54 acres of net buildable area exists on the site. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the site into seven (7) single-family lots. In this case, the applicant is proposing four (4) driveways from County Road E2 in order to provide access to the residential lots. This is an increase of one (1) additional driveway from the existing conditions. Limiting driveways from County Road E2 is accomplished by incorporating shared access from the County roadway for six of the proposed lots. The plans as submitted indicate that every other property would share an access with the neighboring property, except the easternmost lot would have its own individual access from County Road E2. City Planner Streff stated that in addition to the Preliminary & Final Plat for the subdivision, a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment are being requested. Both properties would be rezoned to the R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. In order to rezone the properties, the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to reflect the new Very Low Density Residential land use for the site. Planning Case 15-004 includes three (3) requests: 1. Preliminary & Final Plat. 2. Rezoning to amend the zoning designation for 1941 County Road E2 and 1901 County Road E2 to R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the 2030 Future Land Use Map to classify 1941 and 1901 County Road E2 as Very Low Density Residential land use. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 3 Future Land Use Plan: Site Data Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – P/I Public Institutional; Proposed: VLDR Very Low Density Residential Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: VLDR Very Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – P/I Public Institutional; Proposed: SFD Single Family Detached Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: SFD Single Family Detached Zoning: Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – R1 Single Family Residential; Proposed: R2 Residential Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: R2 Residential Current Lot Sizes: 4.77 Acres (Both Lots Gross Area) Topography: The lots when combined are wooded along the north, east and west sides and slopes approximate 22 feet downward toward the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park along the northern part of the property. City Planner Streff reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation, and the Traffic Study. City Planner Streff provided the Findings of Fact for review: General Findings: 1. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision is comprised of 4.77 acres. 2. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision property located at 1941 County Road E2 is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and the property located at 1901 County Road E2 is currently zoned N-B Neighborhood Business. 3. The Valentine Bluff subdivision is proposed as R-2 Single & Two Family Residential. 4. The R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District permits up to five (5) units per acre. 5. The proposed Valentine Bluff development is proposed at 1.54 units per acre. 6. The Valentine Bluff subdivision property currently has the land use designations of Public & Institutional and Neighborhood Business in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 7. The applicant is proposing to re-plat the property into seven (7) single-family lots. 8. The applicant is proposing to construct seven (7) single-family homes. 9. No new streets will be constructed as a result of this development. 10. The proposed development requires park dedication. 11. The park dedication requirement for this application is six percent of the land in dedication or a fee of six percent of the purchased price or some combination thereof. The current purchase agreement between Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC (Developer/Purchaser), and Bethel University (Owner/Seller) indicates a purchase price of $856,000 for the two properties. Based on the purchase price the park dedication if paid in a fee would be $51,360. 12. As currently designed the proposed plan is not in conformance with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan in regards to the land use classifications; the property at 1941 County Road E2 is guided for Public & Institutional and the property at 1901 County Road E2 is guided for Neighborhood Business. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 4 13. The development plan would require that both properties be re-zoned to R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District and designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Very Low Density Residential. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Findings: 14. The applicant is proposing to amend the City’s Comprehensive Plan to re-designate the land use classifications at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 to Very Low Density Residential in order to permit a density of 1.5 to 3 units per net acre. 15. The development will built at approximately 1.54 units per acre. 16. The proposed land use designation of Very Low Density Residential would be compatible with the adjacent land uses. 17. The proposed redevelopment is a permitted use in the R-2 Residential District. 18. The proposed CPA would advance the City’s goal to promote the development properties that are in keeping with the character of existing and established neighborhoods within the City. 19. The City staff has been in contact with the staff at the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed development and they have indicated their support for the proposed CPA. City Planner Streff stated that based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Valentine Bluff redevelopment project located at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request, staff recommends that the following twenty (20) conditions be included with the approval: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the execution of the Final Plat shall be contingent upon the Metropolitan Council’s approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. That the development agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The development agreement shall be executed prior to execution of the Final Plat. 4. That the Developer shall submit a park dedication, subject to the approval of the City Council, equal to six percent ($51,360) of the total land area, which is currently under a purchase agreement for $856,000. The City shall use the park dedication to expand the City’s parks, trails, and recreation system. 5. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC- insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. 6. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 5 permit. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 7. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 8. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be held by the City for two years after installation of landscaping and used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of landscaping, or developer default. 9. That the proposed project may require permits, including, but not limited to, MPCA- NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MPCA- Sanitary Sewer Extension, Ramsey County and City Right of Way, and City Grading and Erosion Control permits. Copies of all issued permits shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits. 10. That the final plans shall be subject to approval by the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. That the final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the commencement of any construction on the site. 12. That upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 13. Sanitary sewer and water shall be accepted by the City and ready for hookup prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. That the application shall be required to meet the requirements as outlined in the memo from the City Engineer dated 2/19/15. 15. That all landscaping materials shall be put in place as the approved grading plan is completed with the exception of the required three front yard trees, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant to install at the time each house is constructed. 16. That the maintenance agreement between the RCWD and the developer for the stormwater filtration system shall be provided to the City before the issuance of any development permit. 17. That the RCWD Easements on Lot 7 shall be revised to reflect the flood plain limits or provided in writing to indicated that an encroachment is permitted into the easements held by the RCWD. The easement revision or encroachment permit shall be provided to the City and approved by the City Attorney prior to the execution of the final plat. 18. Driveway easements providing for cross access and maintenance agreements shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City Attorney and recorded by the Developer prior to the execution of the final plat. 19. That the western driveway between Lot 1 and 2 across from New Brighton Road shall be realigned to reduce the intersection/driveway skew. The plan for this realignment shall be approved by the City Engineer. 20. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 6 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Holewa asked if staff had input on the location of the tree plantings. City Planner Streff commented that staff did not provide input on the location of tree plantings, and understood that the applicant was trying to create a buffer along the south property line. Dean Hanson, Hanson Builders, introduced himself and his company to the Planning Commission. He commented that his company has been in business since 1979 and completed approximately 75 homes upscale homes each year. He provided comment on the neighborhoods he has constructed throughout the metro area. He believed that this would be a special development with signature homes with a price range of $750,000-950,000. Mr. Hanson discussed the lot size and noted all seven lots conformed with Arden Hills requirements. He stated that of the 98 significant trees on the site, 67 of them would be saved. He reported that each lot would also be irrigated and well landscaped. He explained how the existing hard surface would be reduced on the site, which would improve the water quality for the area. He explained that each home would be energy efficient. He noted the Home Energy Rating System score on his homes ranged from 46 to 56. Mr. Hanson provided comment on the active radon emission systems that come standard with each home. He then reviewed the traffic study and the proposed driveway alignment along County Road E2. He requested that the Planning Commission remove Condition #19 requiring that the driveway between Lot 1 and Lot 2 be aligned with New Brighton Road. He also asked that there be no striping of New Brighton Road. Mr. Hanson requested the Planning Commission allow him one early building permit to start on a model home. He provided a summary of the public benefits on his proposed development. City Planner Streff stated that the construction of a model home would be handled within the Development Agreement. Commissioner Holewa questioned if Mr. Hanson had considered using solar panels on the seven homes. Mr. Hanson commented that there was little or no return on solar panels because his homes were built so efficiently. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if there would be a homeowners association. Mr. Hanson indicated there would not be a homeowners association as each property was completely autonomous. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 4, 2015 7 Commissioner Hames inquired if the developer had any responsibility regarding the trail. City Planner Streff indicated this trail would be completed and maintained by the County. Commissioner Jones suggested that the entrance pillars and gates on each lot be lit. Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. Jason Schmidt, 3778 Brighton Way North, recommended that a stop sign be considered at County Road E2 and New Brighton Road. Christine Polter, 1870 Indian Place, noted she was a 35 year resident of Arden Hills. She commented that she was very interested in building one of the proposed signature homes. She expressed concern with how the crosswalks would be addressed by the City. There being no additional comment Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Commissioner Bartel commented that he was very impressed with the proposed project. He recommended that staff investigate the trail crossing more closely to ensure the intersection of County Road E2 and New Brighton Road remains safe for both vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Commissioner Neururer suggested that the speed limit along County Road E2 be reduced given the new residential homes that would be added. City Planner Streff indicated he would bring this comment to Public Works Director Maurer. Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Hames seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the nineteen (19) conditions (omitting Condition 19) in the March 4, 2015, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 1 of 15 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 2015 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-004 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC Property Location: 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 Request: Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Requested Action The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property located at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 in order to subdivide the two (2) parcels into seven (7) single-family lots. Background Landmark of Arden Hills has a purchase agreement with Bethel University for approximately 4.77 acres of land consisting of two contiguous parcels at 1941 and 1901 County Road E2. The property at 1941 County Road E2 is the site of the former Ramsey County library, which closed in December of 2010. The Minnesota Baptist Conference occupied the facility at 1901 County Road E2 for a number of years beginning in the early 1970s, but this structure is also currently vacant. The applicant is requesting approval for a project that would result in the redevelopment of both properties for seven (7) single-family homes. The property at 1941 County Road E2 is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is guided for Public Institutional uses in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The adjacent property at 1901 County Road E2 is now zoned N-B Neighborhood Business and is also guided for Neighborhood Business uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is bordered to the north and east by a system of wetlands within Tony Schmidt Regional Park, managed by Ramsey County. Generally, the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 2 of 15 topography of the properties is relatively flat around where the existing structures are located, but slopes down more significantly along the northern and eastern edges of the site. Small wetland areas are present in the far northeast and southeast corners of the site and are currently protected by easements held by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has a sixty-eight (68) foot wide easement across the western portion of the 1941 County Road E2 property for the purpose of a future trail connection through the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park. Project Proposal and Process 1. Project Description The site is approximately 4.77 gross acres in size and located near the intersection of New Brighton Road and County Road E2 and bordered by Tony Schmidt Regional Park to the north. The site is comprised of two contiguous parcels, both of which have existing structures on them that would be demolished as part of the project. Three separate driveways on County Road E2 currently provide access to the properties. After accounting for the right-of-way area that extends into County Road E2 and the flood plain/wetlands areas located on the site, 4.54 acres of net buildable area exists on the site. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the site into seven (7) single-family lots. In this case the applicant is proposing four (4) driveways from County Road E2 in order to provide access to the residential lots. This is an increase of one (1) additional driveway from the existing conditions. Limiting driveways from County Road E2 is accomplished by incorporating shared access from the County roadway for six of the proposed lots. The plans as submitted indicate that every other property would share an access with the neighboring property, except the easternmost lot would have its own individual access from County Road E2. In addition to the Preliminary & Final Plat for the subdivision, a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment are being requested. Both properties would be rezoned to the R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. In order to rezone the properties, the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to reflect the new Very Low Density Residential land use for the site. The applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed redevelopment in greater detail and why the overall proposal is within the public interest (Attachment A). A complete plan set, including the Preliminary & Final Plat and Tree Preservation Plan, have also been submitted (Attachment B). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 3 of 15 Planning Case 15-004 includes three (3) requests: 1. Preliminary & Final Plat. 2. Rezoning to amend the zoning designation for 1941 County Road E2 and 1901 County Road E2 to R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District. 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the 2030 Future Land Use Map to classify 1941 and 1901 County Road E2 as Very Low Density Residential land use. 2. Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North P/OS – Park & Open Space POS – Parks & Open Space P/OS – Park & Open Space South LDR – Low Density Residential R2 – Single & Two Family Residential SFD – Single-family Detached East P/OS – Park & Open Space POS – Parks & Open Space P/OS – Park & Open Space West P/OS – Park & Open Space POS – Parks & Open Space R1 – Single Family Residential P/OS – Park & Open Space SFD – Single-family Detached 3. Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – P/I Public Institutional; Proposed: VLDR Very Low Density Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: VLDR Very Low Density Existing Land Use: Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – P/I Public Institutional; Proposed: SFD Single Family Detached Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: SFD Single Family Detached Zoning: Existing: 1941 County Road E2 W – R1 Single Family Residential; Proposed: R2 Residential Existing: 1901 County Road E2 W – NB Neighborhood Business; Proposed: R2 Residential Lot Size: 4.77 Acres (Both Lots Gross Area) Topography: The lots when combined are wooded along the north, east and west sides and slopes approximate 22 feet downward toward the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park along the northern part of the property. Plan Evaluation 1. Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan lays out the future land uses that are anticipated for all properties within the City. Based on the future land uses, the City can plan for improvements, anticipate infrastructure needs, and create appropriate land use regulations. The City’s Zoning Code identifies specific zoning districts through which the land uses and goals in the Comprehensive Plan can be implemented. The zoning cannot conflict with the future land use designation. When there is a conflict between a city’s comprehensive plan and a zoning code, the city is required to amend the zoning code to comply with the comprehensive plan, unless the city approves an amendment to the comprehensive plan. The Metropolitan Council has the final City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 4 of 15 determination as to whether to allow a CPA or not, though they provide great deference to the City as long as the proposed land use change does not have a negative impact on a regional system (i.e. transportation, sanitary sewer, and regional parks). A city has broad discretion when reviewing whether to rezone a property or amend its Comprehensive Plan. Questions to consider include whether or not the proposed project forwards the broader goals and vision for the City? Would the rezoned property allow for a better development than the current zoning would permit? Is the proposed zoning district appropriate to that particular location? Would the proposed change forward the goals of the comprehensive plan? The request would include the rezoning of property from R -1 Single Family Residential (1941 County Road E2) and N-B Neighborhood Business (1901 County Road E2) to R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District. The official Zoning Map of the City would be updated to reflect this change in zoning if the project is approved. As part of the CPA for the Valentine Bluff project, a change in land use designation from Public Institutional (1941 County Road E2) and Neighborhood Business (1901 County Road E2) to Very Low Density Residential at approximately 1.54 units per acre is being requested. The City’s 2030 Future Land Use Map would be amended to re-designate the property to reflect the change in land use classification. The Very Low Density Residential land use category allows for development at a net density of 1.5 to 3 units per acre. Net density is defined as the number of dwelling units per acre of land when the acreage involved includes only land for residential uses and excludes arterial street rights of way, wetlands and water features, and other publicly dedicated improvements, such as parks and trails. If the City approves the CPA, one of the conditions of approval will be that the project is contingent on final approval from the Metropolitan Council. The request for the Future Land Use Map amendment will need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the City. The Metropolitan Council then has 60 days to review the application, though due to the small size of the project and the lack of negative impacts, the City will be requesting a shortened review timeline of 14 days. Once the Metropolitan Council completes their review, they will notify the City of their decision. If the CPA is approved, the applicant can move forward with filing the Final Plat and applying for development permits. The City must also allow adjacent governments, affected special districts, and affected school districts up to 60 days to review the comprehensive plan amendment. This waiting period allows interested parties to review and comment on the amendment before Metropolitan Council review. However, the Metropolitan Council may prescribe a shorter review and comment period for “minor plan amendments” or may waive the review and comment period if a minor plan amendment involves lands that are not contiguous to other local governmental units. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 5 of 15 2. Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations Review A. Street Plan & Streets No new streets are being constructed for the Valentine Bluff development. All seven (7) lots will have access from County Road E2 through four (4) access points. Limiting driveways from County Road E2 is accomplished by incorporating shared access from the County roadway. The plans as submitted indicate that every other property would share an access with the neighboring property, except the easternmost lot would have its own individual access from County Road E2. All other requirements pertaining to street access, driveway locations and the finished grade of these facilities are met by the proposed plans. B. Easements City subdivision regulations require twelve (12) foot wide utility and drainage easements dedicated to the City along the right-of-way and centered on common lot lines. The plat includes twelve (12) foot utility and drainage easements that are centered on the common lots lines throughout the development and a twelve (12) foot easement along the County Road E2 right-of-way and along the northern property line adjacent to Tony Schmidt Regional Park. The easements in these areas meet the City’s subdivision regulations. All utility and drainage easements will be dedicated to the public as required by the Subdivision Code. In addition, a sixty-eight (68) foot park, trail, and recreational easement has been provided by the applicant to the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department for the purpose of a future trail connection through the wetland complex in Tony Schmidt Regional Park. This easement area is located across the western portion of proposed Lot 1. C. Park Dedication The Subdivision Ordinance requires developers of subdivisions to dedicate to the public a reasonable percentage of the tract to be developed. Section 1130.08 Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance indicates that for a subdivision that results in new dwelling units less than two units per acre, the applicants shall dedicate six percent of the buildable land area in the subdivision or pay a park dedication fee of six percent of the property’s land value. The City Attorney has indicated that a park dedication based on the purchase price of the two properties is appropriate in this Planning Case. The current purchase agreement between Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC (Developer/Purchaser), and Bethel University (Owner/Seller) indicates a purchase price of $856,000 for the two properties. Based on the purchase price the park dedication if paid in a fee would be $51,360. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 6 of 15 D. Required Improvements – Meets Requirements All other required improvements, including sewer, water, utilities, and driveway connections to County Road E2 will be constructed in accordance with the City’s Subdivision Code. 3. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review Section 1320 – District Provisions (R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District) A. Lot Area & Dimensions The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots. As proposed, Lot 1 has a size of 44,483 square feet and Lots 2-7 have a size of 27,202 square feet. The Zoning Code requires a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet in the R2 District. All lots within the Valentine Bluff subdivision meet the requirements required for lot area. The Code also requires individual lots in the R-2 Zoning District to have a street frontage of at least 85 feet, and a lot depth of at least 120 feet. Lot frontage is measured at the minimum front yard setback, which allows homes to be constructed on a radius, such as on a cul-de-sac or curve. As indicated by the applicant and reflected on the submitted plans all lots meet the minimum width 85 feet and minimum depth of 120 feet. Lot Total Lot Area Square Feet Width (Feet) Depth (Feet) Zoning Code 11,000 85 120 1 44,483 139 320 2-7 27,202 85 320 B. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The FAR is the sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building as measured in square feet from the exterior sides of the exterior walls, but not including covered porches; decks; any space where the average floor-to-ceiling height is less than six feet; attached or detached garages; and other detached accessory structures. The R-2 Zoning District allows a FAR up to 30% for a residential structure in this district. The applicant has indicated that all lots within the development will not exceed this Code requirement. The diagram below provides an example of the City’s existing FAR requirement of 30% when applied to the Valentine Bluff development. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 7 of 15 Lot Size Home Size with FAR of 30% 27,202 (Smallest Lot Proposed) *8,160 square feet 44,483 (Largest Lot Proposed) *13,345 square feet *Each FAR column indicates the maximum home size in square feet per lot (not including the attached garage, decks, or accessory structures). C. Building Coverage and Landscaped Lot Area The applicants have submitted a site plan that indicates proposed building pads for each lot. The building pads reflect the typical area of each lot that a home would be built upon. Based on a measurement of the proposed building pads, each lot can be constructed to meet the City’s required building coverage maximum and landscaped lot area minimums. The maximum lot coverage for impervious surfaces is 35% and the minimum landscape coverage is 65% in the R-2 Zoning District. D. Building Height and Density The maximum building height in the R-2 District is 35 feet. None of the homes constructed on this site would exceed the City’s height requirements. The maximum density allowed by the Zoning Code within the R-2 District is 5 units per net acre. There are 4.54 buildable acres on this property. The construction of seven (7) single- family units would result in a net density of 1.54 units per acre. The City’s C omprehensive Plan currently sets the minimum density allowed for new development at 1.5 units per acre. The land use classification of Very Low Density is defined as 1.5 to 3 units per acre. If the proposed development is approved the City will reclassify this property in the 2030 Future Land Use Map as Very Low Density. F. Setbacks The minimum building setbacks in the R-2 District are 40 feet in the front yard, 30 feet in the rear yard, and 5 feet minimum in a side yard, with both sides required to add up to 15 feet. All setback requirements stated in the Zoning Code are being met by the proposed Valentine Bluff development. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 8 of 15 Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Accessory Structures No accessory structures are proposed to be constructed as part of this application. Future homeowners who choose to construct accessory structures will be required to do so in accordance with the required Zoning Requirements unless a variance is granted by the City. B. Tree Preservation The applicant submitted a Tree Survey and Tree Replacement Plan as part of their tree preservation and mitigation requirements (Attachment B). The following table outlines these numbers and the additional requirements of the tree preservation ordinance pertaining to tree removal and tree mitigation regulations. Caliper Inches Number of Trees Total Existing Trees 1,725 98 10% Permitted Removal 172.5 -- Proposed Removal 546.5 31 Trees Preserved 1,178.5 67 Replacement Trees Required* 187 --** Replacement Trees Proposed 272.5 109 * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. ** The number of trees required may vary depending on the size of the trees planted by the developer. City Code requires a certain number of caliper inches to be planted. If larger trees are planted then fewer trees would be required. Trees proposed to be planted will consist of desirable and native tree species such as Linden, Maple, Hackberry, Locust, Birch, Oak, and mixed types of evergreen trees. The applicant has developed the lots in such a way to preserve as many of the highest quality trees as possible. In total 109 trees will be planted, equating to 272.5 caliper inches. Based on the proposed tree removal, the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance requires 187 caliper inches to be planted on the site. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 9 of 15 4. Traffic Study A traffic study for this site was originally conducted back in December of 2014, for the Valentine Cove development proposal. The new proposal for Valentine Bluff indicates that lots would have direct access to County Road E2. The updated list of conclusions and recommendations provided by SRF Consulting regarding the Valentine Bluff development has been provided in Attachment F. The complete traffic study from December of 2014, has been provided in Attachment G. The traffic study that was completed by SRF Consulting concluded the following: 1) The proposed number of single-family dwelling units has changed from eight (8) units to seven (7) units from the previous analysis. No significant impacts to the previous analysis and/or traffic operations are expected. 2) Realign the western driveway between Lot 1 and 2 across from New Brighton Road to reduce the intersection/driveway skew. The north and south through lanes from New Brighton Road should align with the driveway if possible. 3) Consider signing the driveway between Lot 1 and 2 as “private” to avoid driver confusion. 4) Restripe the south approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection to include a northbound shared left-/through lane and a dedicated right-turn lane. 5) Remove the crosswalk on County Road E2 which is currently located approximately 100 feet east of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection. 6) Extend the trail connection to the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection and add a crosswalk on the west side of the intersection. 6. Additional Review A. Building Official & Fire Marshal The Building Official and Fire Marshal have reviewed the application and do not have any objections to the proposed project. All final plans will be subject to the Building Official and Fire Marshal’s approval prior to the issuance of any permits. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 10 of 15 B. Public Works Director & City Engineer The Public Works Director and City Engineer have reviewed the plans for the Valentine Bluff development project. Comments from the Public Works Department can be found in Attachment C. All final grading and utility plans will be subject to the approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any development permits. C. Ramsey County Review Ramsey County has reviewed the application for Valentine Bluff and has provided comments to City staff. The County indicated that they do not have any objections to the proposed project and approval has been given to construct the four (4) access driveways onto County Road E2. The County also stated that any work conducted within the right-of-way requires a permit. C. Rice Creek Watershed District The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is charged with reviewing and approving the drainage plan. The proposal for the Valentine Bluff development has been submitted to the RCWD, and they did issue a conditional approval upon receipt of changes (CAPROC) on February 25, 2015 (Attachment D). The changes requested by the RCWD are not expected to impact the plat design. The developer expects to have full approval from the RCWD by the time the proposal proceeds to the City Council. Based on initial comments from the RCWD review, the applicant has included individual infiltration facilities on each lot in order to treat stormwater runoff from the site. These filtration facilities direct stormwater from the front and sides of each lot to the rear or north side of each property where a larger infiltration facility will collect the stormwater before it is released. The infiltration facilities will be maintained by each individual land owner under a maintenance agreement with the RCWD. D. Surrounding Jurisdictions As part of the requirements for amending the City’s Comprehensive Plan, notice of the proposed plan amendment will be sent to the adjacent cities, Mounds View School District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Ramsey County if required by the Metropolitan Council. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 11 of 15 Findings of Fact: Staff offers the following nineteen (19) findings of fact for this proposal: General Findings: 1. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision is comprised of 4.77 acres. 2. The proposed Valentine Bluff subdivision property located at 1941 County Road E2 is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and the property located at 1901 County Road E2 is currently zoned N-B Neighborhood Business. 3. The Valentine Bluff subdivision is proposed as R-2 Single & Two Family Residential. 4. The R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District permits up to five (5) units per acre. 5. The proposed Valentine Bluff development is proposed at 1.54 units per acre. 6. The Valentine Bluff subdivision property currently has the land use designations of Public & Institutional and Neighborhood Business in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 7. The applicant is proposing to re-plat the property into seven (7) single-family lots. 8. The applicant is proposing to construct seven (7) single-family homes. 9. No new streets will be constructed as a result of this development. 10. The proposed development requires park dedication. 11. The park dedication requirement for this application is six percent of the land in dedication or a fee of six percent of the purchased price or some combination thereof. The current purchase agreement between Landmark of Arden Hills, LLC (Developer/Purchaser), and Bethel University (Owner/Seller) indicates a purchase price of $856,000 for the two properties. Based on the purchase price the park dedication if paid in a fee would be $51,360. 12. As currently designed the proposed plan is not in conformance with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan in regards to the land use classifications; the property at 1941 County Road E2 is guided for Public & Institutional and the property at 1901 County Road E2 is guided for Neighborhood Business. 13. The development plan would require that both properties be re-zoned to R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District and designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Very Low Density Residential. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Findings: 14. The applicant is proposing to amend the City’s Comprehensive Plan to re-designate the land use classifications at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 to Very Low Density Residential in order to permit a density of 1.5 to 3 units per net acre. 15. The development will built at approximately 1.54 units per acre. 16. The proposed land use designation of Very Low Density Residential would be compatible with the adjacent land uses. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 12 of 15 17. The proposed redevelopment is a permitted use in the R-2 Residential District. 18. The proposed CPA would advance the City’s goal to promote the development properties that are in keeping with the character of existing and established neighborhoods within the City. 19. The City staff has been in contact with the staff at the Metropolitan Council regarding the proposed development and they have indicated their support for the proposed CPA. Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Valentine Bluff redevelopment project located at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request, staff recommends that the following twenty (20) conditions be included with the approval: 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the execution of the Final Plat shall be contingent upon the Metropolitan Council’s approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. That the development agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The development agreement shall be executed prior to execution of the Final Plat. 4. That the Developer shall submit a park dedication, subject to the approval of the City Council, equal to six percent ($51,360) of the total land area, which is currently under a purchase agreement for $856,000. The City shall use the park dedication to expand the City’s parks, trails, and recreation system. 5. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. 6. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, retaining walls, stormwater filtration systems, and driveway openings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 13 of 15 7. That the Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. 8. That the Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of a building permit. The escrow will be held by the City for two years after installation of landscaping and used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of landscaping, or developer default. 9. That the proposed project may require permits, including, but not limited to, MPCA- NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MPCA- Sanitary Sewer Extension, Ramsey County and City Right of Way, and City Grading and Erosion Control permits. Copies of all issued permits shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits. 10. That the final plans shall be subject to approval by the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. That the final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the commencement of any construction on the site. 12. That upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 13. Sanitary sewer and water shall be accepted by the City and ready for hookup prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. That the application shall be required to meet the requirements as outlined in the memo from the City Engineer dated 2/19/15. 15. That all landscaping materials shall be put in place as the approved grading plan is completed with the exception of the required three front yard trees, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant to install at the time each house is constructed. 16. That the maintenance agreement between the RCWD and the developer for the stormwater filtration system shall be provided to the City before the issuance of any development permit. 17. That the RCWD Easements on Lot 7 shall be revised to reflect the flood plain limits or provided in writing to indicated that an encroachment is permitted into the easements held by the RCWD. The easement revision or encroachment permit shall be provided to the City and approved by the City Attorney prior to the execution of the final plat. 18. Driveway easements providing for cross access and maintenance agreements shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City Attorney and recorded by the Developer prior to the execution of the final plat. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 14 of 15 19. That the western driveway between Lot 1 and 2 across from New Brighton Road shall be realigned to reduce the intersection/driveway skew. The plan for this realignment shall be approved by the City Engineer. 20. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2, based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the twenty (20) conditions in the March 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15- 004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the March 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2 based on the following findings of fact….. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 15-004 for a Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to subdivide the property into seven (7) single-family lots at 1941 & 1901 County Road E2: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin on February 18, 2015, and mailed to all properties within 1,000 feet of the subject property. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-004 - Valentine Bluff (1901 & 1941 County Road E2) - Preliminary and Final Plat, Rezoning and Comp Plan Amendment\Memos_Reports_15-004 Page 15 of 15 Resident Comment Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 26, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 26, 2015, (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The petitioner was notified on February 13, 2015, of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by May 25, 2015 (120 days). The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Application and Narrative B. Development Plans C. City Engineer Comments D. RCWD Comments E. Ramsey County Comments F. Traffic Study Update – Valentine Bluff G. Traffic Study – Valentine Cove H. Example Housing Styles I. Aerial Map VALENTINE BLUFF – Narrative Landmark of Arden Hills A new neighborhood in Arden Hills Existing Property Description The land, whose address is listed as 1941 and 1901 Co. Rd. E2 West is located near the intersection of New Brighton Road and Co. Road E2, consists of 5.41 ac and is currently under a purchase agreement with the applicant. The property is bounded on the north by a wetland system and Mounds View High School and to the south by a small single family neighborhood. Existing Land Use and Zoning The property currently features a County Library and a Church and is zoned accordingly as R1 and NB. The proposed zoning for the residential development is R-2. The following table shows the R-2 zoning requirements: R-2 Minimum Lot Area (SF) 11,000 Minimum Lot Size 85’/120’ Front Yard 40’ Rear Yard 30’ Side Yard (min/total) 5’/15’ Side Yard Corner 40’ Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30% Proposed Neighborhood The proposed neighborhood will have 7 homes on the 5.41 ac. existing parcel of which 0.64 ac will be dedicated to the county for ROW and another 0.227ac is either in flood plain or wetland. This leaves 4.543 ac for a density of 1.54 un./ac. within the limits of the 1.5 to 5.0 un./ac. of the City’s R2 district. All 7 lots have access to County Road E2, as shown on the attached site plan. The site plan shows 3 shared driveway for 6 of the homes and 1 individual driveway for a total of 4 proposed access points onto Country Road E2. We have sent this plan to Erin Laberee, P.E. Ramsey County Department of Public Works and she has responded in support of the 4 driveways to County Road E2 vs. the 7 individual driveways. The Lots The applicant is proposing lots to facilitate a development that proposes minimal changes to the land and enhancing the quality of life for the residents by maintaining and creating ecological functions and biodiversity. The applicant proposes to meet the R-2 zoning, with a min. lot size of more than 11,000 square feet (the minimum square foot requirement for the R-2), the average lot area is 29,670 sf, the smallest lot is 27,202 sf (lots 2-7), the largest lot is 44,483 (lot 1). A front yard setback of 40’and rear yard setback of 30’ and a combined side yard setback of (5’/15’). Homes The homes will fit and reinforce the neighborhood feeling. Each home will be unique and sized to fit R-2 zoning standards. These will be highly detailed, crafted homes consisting of two stories and sited individually to each lot. The exterior of the homes will have a basis in historical architectural style and fine detailing but respect and accommodate the needs of today’s families. The proposed homes will begin at +/-$750k., and will provide a consistent feeling to the neighborhood to the south of E2. Stormwater Treatment Overall hard cover on the site has been reduced by 0.71 acres. Stormwater features are designed to meet Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) requirements. The majority of Stormwater will be direct to filtration trenches in the front and side yards. These 2’ wide x 1’ deep trenches will filter water through a 4” sand layer to a 4” draintile with a 4” clean sand base below. These trenches will direct stormwater to the larger infiltration trench that runs along the rear of the yards. This trench will be 570’ long, 7’, and 3’ deep. This trench shall be filled with clean filter sand. Rear yard water will run over at least 75’ of vegetation prior to meeting this infiltration trench which according to RCWD qualifies as pre-treatment. The combination of these features will achieve RCWD rate and volume goals. In summary, the applicant is employing the resources of highly talented planners, engineers and ecologists to provide the City of Arden Hills with a high quality residential neighborhood. MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 2015 TO: Ryan Streff, City Planner FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director John Anderson, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Valentine Bluff We have reviewed the plans for Valentine Bluff prepared by Sather-Bergquist dated 1/22/15 the following are our comments: 1. All work preparing the lots for home construction, as detailed in the plans must be completed before issuing a building permit for an individual lot, with one exception. We assume the portion of the retaining wall on lot 7 adjacent to the home needs to be built along with the foundation of the home. The retaining wall along the driveway will need to be in place prior to home construction to allow access for construction. 2. Water services need to be sized to provide fire protection if required by building code. 3. Water services currently inplace serving 1941 and 1901 Co. Rd. E-2 may be reused if the existing service pipe material is copper. New curb stops need to be installed at the right of way. New curb stops are to be no larger than 1” 4. A Ramsey County right of way permit will be required for all work within the right of way of County Road E-2 5. A construction permit from the MPCA is required for grading the site 6. A permit from Rice Creek Watershed District is required for grading and stormwater treatment 7. A building permit will be required for the retaining wall, all walls over 4 feet require and engineered design and due to the height a fence will be needed along the top of the wall 8. In areas where the bituminous trail is removed to connect the water services the bituminous repair shall be a full width patch. 9. A city issued grading and erosion control permit will be required for the entire project. Building permits will require a survey with grading and erosion control information shown for each lot. At the completion of building a grading asbuilt will need to be provided before issuing a certificate of occupancy. 10. A homeowners association or some other structure will need to be inplace for operation and maintenance of the drainage system. This will not be publicly maintained RiceCreekWatershed DistrictPermit Application StatusUpdate THISISNOT APERMIT PermitApplicationNumber: 14-105 DateofBoardAction: 02/25/2015 Current Status: ConditionallyApprovedPendingReceiptOfChanges (CAPROC) Pleasenotethefollowing: notYouare authorizedtobeginsiteworkuntilallpendingitemsaresatisfiedas enumeratedintheattachedEngineer’sReport. Ifprojectisinitiatedwithout obtaininganRCWDPermit, theprojectwillbestoppedbytheDistrictInspector untilthepermitisobtained. 12monthsYouhave fromthedateofBoardactiontosubmit/satisfyallpending itemsandreceiveapermit. Otherwise theconditional approvalexpiresanda newapplication willneedtobesubmitted andconsideredbytheBoard. RCWD staffisnotauthorizedtograntextensions. two (2) papercopiesTosatisfypendingitems, applicants mustsubmit ofall submittal itemstotheDistrictwiththeexceptionofplansheets. Plansheetsmust 1full-sizedcopies1reduced sizeinclude , and (11by17inchesorsmaller) or electronicfilean . Surety forsuretyamountsof $5000orless, theapplicantmustsubmitacheck madeouttotheRCWD. Forsuretyamountsover $5000, theapplicantmust providethefirst $5000intheformofacheckandhastheoptionofproviding the remainderofthesuretyamountintheformofaLetterofCredit (seewebsitefor template) orperformance bond. Anescrowagreementisrequiredwiththe submittalofsurety. (Publicentitiesarenotsubjecttosuretyobligations.) Easements ifaneasementisrequiredperyourlistofpending itemsinthe attachedEngineer’sReport, thenthelegaldescriptionsoftheseeasements must beprepared bytheapplicant, reviewedandapprovedbytheDistrict, andthen submittedtotheCountyRecorder’sOfficeforrecording. Aneasement template isonthewebsite. WetlandConservationActForms Forprojectsinvolvingwetlandimpactsand replacement, Statelawrequiresthepreparation andrecordingofWetland Legal Formsforreplacementwetlands. Instructions forcompleting andrecordingthese formsareincludedinthewetlandlegalformsdocumentonthewebsite. The wetlandlegaldocuments requiretheapplicanttopreparelegaldescriptions ofall replacementwetlands. Theselegaldescriptionsandtheformsmustbereviewed andapprovedbytheDistrictprior tosubmittaltotheCountyRecorder’sOfficefor recording. StormwaterOperation & Maintenance Forprojectsinvolvingstormwater pondsandinfiltration features, applicantsmustcompleteandrecorda Stormwater OperationandMaintenance Agreement (seewebsitefortemplate) forthesefeaturesunlessaCityassumesthemaintenance responsibilitiesof thesefeaturesasindicatedinanagreementwiththeDistrict. Anexhibitand/or legaldescriptionthatclearlydelineatesandidentifiesallstormwaterand infiltrationfeatures mustaccompanythestormwateroperationandmaintenance agreement. Adraftofthisagreementwithaccompanyingexhibitmustbe submitted totheDistrictforreview andapprovalpriortosubmissiontothe CountyRecorder’soffice. cc: - CityofArdenHills; NathanFair (Landmark ofArdenHills), 13432HansonBlvdNW , Andover, MN 55304 nathanfair@edinarealty.com; CharlesWiemerslage (Sathre-BergquistInc.), 150BroadwayAvenueS. , Wayzata, MN55391 cwiemerslage@sathre.com; OFFICIALDOCUMENT: This Engineer’sreporthasbeenacceptedby theRCWD BoardofManagers. The RecommendationsandStipulations belowareincorporatedasbindingterms ofRCWDPermit14-105 PermitApplication Number: 14-105 Permit ApplicantName: ValentineBluff Applicant: Consultant: NathanFair CharlesWiemerslage LandmarkofArdenHills Sathre-BergquistInc. 13432HansonBlvdNW 150BroadwayAvenueS. Andover, MN55304 Wayzata, MN55391 Ph: 763-438-2561 Ph: 952-476-6000 Fx: Fx: 952-476-0104 nathanfair@edinarealty.com cwiemerslage@sathre.com BobMolstad Sathre-BergquistInc. Ph: 952-476-6000 Fx: 952-476-0104 molstad@sathre.com ProjectName: ValentineBluff Purpose: FSD – FinalSiteDrainage; Redevelopmentoftwocommerciallotstosinglefamily residentialsitedevelopment SiteSize: 2parcelstotaling5.41± acreparcel / 3.6 ± acresofdisturbedarea; existingandproposed imperviousareais1.51± acresand0.80 ± acres, respectively Location: NorthoftheintersectionofWCountyRdE2andNewBrightonRd, ArdenHills T-R-S: NW ¼, Section28, T30N, R23W DistrictRule: C, D Recommendations: CAPROC ItisrecommendedthatthisPermitApplicationbegivenConditionalApprovalPendingReceiptof Changes (CAPROC) andoutstandingitemsrelatedtothefollowingitems. RuleD – ErosionandSedimentControl 1. SubmitthefollowinginformationperRuleD.4: b) Tabulationoftheconstructionimplementation schedule. c) Name, addressandphonenumberofpartyresponsible formaintenanceofallerosionand sedimentcontrolmeasures. h) ProvidedocumentationthatanNPDESPermithasbeenappliedforandsubmittedtothe MinnesotaPollutionControlAgency (MPCA). i) AStormWaterPollutionPrevention PlanforprojectsthatrequireanNPDESPermit. HoustonEngineeringInc. Page1of4 2/25/2015 RCWDPermitNumber14-105 Administrative 2. Sendonefinal, signedfullsizedplansettotheDistrict, ande-mailapdfcopytoboththeDistrict andtheDistrictEngineer. Includealistofchangesthathavebeenmadesinceapprovalbythe RCWDBoard. 3. IfrequiredbytheCityofArdenHills, theapplicantmustsubmitadraftlegaldocumentproviding satisfactory formanddescriptiongrantingpondingandflowageeasementsoverallonsiteponds, wetlands, andotherhydrologicfeatures. 4. TheapplicantmustsubmitaDraftDeclarationforMaintenance ofStormwaterManagement FacilitiesacceptabletotheDistrictforproposedonsitestormwatermanagement andpretreatment features. 5. TheapplicantmustsubmitacopyofreceiptfromCountyRecorderandsigned/notarizedattested legaldocument(s). 6. Theapplicantmustsubmitasurety $5,700alongwithanoriginalexecuted escrowagreement acceptabletotheDistrict. Iftheapplicantdesiresanoriginal copyfortheirrecords, thentwo originalsignedescrowagreementsshouldbesubmitted. Theapplicantmustprovidethefirst 5000intheformofacheckandhastheoptionofprovidingtheremainderofthesuretyamount intheformofacheckoraPerformance BondorLetterofCredit. Stipulations: Thepermitwillbeissuedwiththefollowingstipulationsasconditionsofthepermit. By acceptingthepermit, applicantagreestothesestipulations: 1. Anas-builtsurveyofallstormwaterBMPs (ponds, raingardens, trenches, swales, etc.) istobe submittedtotheDistrictforverificationofcompliancewiththeapprovedplansbeforereturnofthe surety. Exhibits: 1. Plansetcontainingsheets1-3of5, datedandreceived2-6-2015. 2. AltaSurvey (sheetAA-1), datedandreceived1-2-2015. 3. Permitapplicationwithoriginalsignature, dated12-19-2014andreceived12-22-2014. 4. Permitapplication checklist, nodate, received1-2-2014. 5. StormwaterCalculations, dated11-3-2014andreceived 12-19-2014, containing narrative, drainagemaps, HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed andexistingconditionsandthegeotechnicalreport (dated11-3-2014). 6. RevisedStormwaterCalculations, dated1-2-2015andreceived1-9-2015, containingnarrative; drainagemaps; HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed andexistingconditions; thegeotechnicalreport (dated11-3-2014). 7. RevisedStormwaterCalculations, dated1-22-2015andreceived1-23-2015, containingnarrative, drainagemaps, HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed conditionsandthe2-yearrainfall eventforexistingconditionsandthegeotechnicalreport (dated 11-3-2014); wetlanddelineationreport (dated10-17-2014), anddrainageeasementdocument dated3-25-1980). 8. RevisedStormwaterCalculations, dated andreceived1-30-2015, containing narrative, drainage maps, HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed conditions HoustonEngineering Inc Page2of4 2/25/2015 RCWDPermitNumber14-105 andthe2-yearrainfall eventforexistingconditionsandthegeotechnicalreport (dated11-3- 2014); wetlanddelineationreport (dated10-17-2014), anddrainage easementdocument (dated 3-25-1980). 9. RevisedStormwaterCalculations, dated andreceived2-6-2015, containing narrative, drainage maps, HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed conditions andthe2-yearrainfall eventforexistingconditionsandthegeotechnicalreport (dated11-3- 2014); wetlanddelineationreport (dated10-17-2014), anddrainage easementdocument (dated 3-25-1980). 10. RevisedStormwaterCalculations, dated andreceived2-16-2015, containing narrative, drainage maps, HydroCAD reportforthe2-year, 10-year, 100-yearrainfalleventsforproposed conditions andthe2-yearrainfall eventforexistingconditionsandthegeotechnicalreport (dated11-3- 2014); wetlanddelineationreport (dated10-17-2014), anddrainage easementdocument (dated 3-25-1980). 11. Purchaseagreement forproperties, dated10-24-2014andreceived1-5-2015. 12. Agencyletterauthorization, dated1-8-2015andreceived1-9-2015. 13. Responseletter, datedandreceived1-30-2015. Findings: 1. Description – Theproject, locatedinArdenHills, proposestodemolishtwoexistingcommercial lotstotaling5.41± acresandredevelop thepropertyintosevensinglefamilylots, andassociated utilities. Existingandproposedimperviousareasare1.51± acresand0.80± acresrespectively. Theprojectwilldisturb3.6± acresoverall. DrainagefromtheprojectwilldischargetoDNRpublic watercomplex62-184W, referredtoasFarrell’swetland. Fromthere, itdischargesthrougha naturalchanneltoLongLake, theResourceofConcern. Theapplicanthassubmitteda $2,250 applicationfee, whichcorrespondsto1-2.5acresofnew/redevelopedimpervioussurface (thisis correctasitcorrespondstotheoriginalsubmittal) and2.5-10acresoflanddisturbance. 2. Stormwater – TheapplicantisproposingtheBMPsasdescribedbelowfortheproject : ProposedBMPDescription Location Pretreatment: Volumeprovided (CF) Filtrationtrench BackofLot1 See 955 Filtrationtrench BackofLot2 below 1003 Filtrationtrench BackofLot3 993 Filtrationtrench BackofLot4 1,016 Filtrationtrench BackofLot5 1,018 Filtrationtrench BackofLot6 873 Filtrationtrench BackofLot7 730 EastsideofLots1,2, NA – Conveyance4, 5and6Draintilecollectionsystem NA systemWestsideofLots3, 7 Total 6,588 HoustonEngineering Inc Page3of4 2/25/2015 RCWDPermitNumber14-105 Soilsonsiteareprimarilysiltysand (HSGB) topsoil, underlainbysandyleanclays (HSGD) soils. Thus, infiltration isnotconsideredfeasibleandfiltrationisacceptabletomeetthewaterquality requirement. PerRuleC.6(c)(1), theWaterQualityrequirement is2.2-inchesoverthe new/reconstructedarea (35,000± SF) foratotalrequirementof6,417± cubicfeet. Runofffromthe drivewaysisroutedtodepressionalareasinthefrontandcollectedviadraintiletoafiltration trenchinthebackyard, whichwillalsocatchsheetflowfromtherearroofs. Eachlothasa separatetrenchanddrain-tilesystem. Thisprovidesadequatepre-treatment. Thetrenchesare expectedtodraw-downwithin48-hours. Thetrencheshaveprovided3-feetoffiltermaterial abovethedraintile. Groundwaterwasnotencountered. Approximately90% oftheprojectarea hasbeentreated. AdditionaltreatmentorTSSremovalisnotfeasible. Thustheapplicanthas compliedwiththeRuleC.9(c) designrequirementsandprovidedadequatevolumetomeetthe RuleC.6WaterQualityRequirement. 2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs) DrainageArea Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Westernpropertyline 2.94 0.34 5.22 0.80 10.72 1.99 Eastandsouthern 4.22 1.71 8.04 4.96 17.41 19.88propertyline Totals 7.16 2.05 13.26 5.76 28.13 21.87 10.61 22.5080% ofExisting 5.73 TheprojectislocatedwithintheFloodManagementZone. AsallthedrainageflowstoFarrel’s wetland, theincreaseshownatthe100-yearattheeastern/southernpropertylinewillnothavean adverseimpact. TheprojecthascompliedwiththeRuleC.7requirements. Theprojectwillnot haveameasurableeffectontheFarrel’swetlandcomplex, whichcomplieswiththebounceand inundationcriteriaofRuleC.8. TheprojectcomplieswiththefreeboardrequirementsofRule C.9(g). 3. Wetlands – Awetlanddelineationwithboundaryapprovalwasconductedforthesiteunder reviewfile14-169R. Theprojectwillnotimpactanywetlands. 4. Floodplain – Theregulatory floodplainelevationfortheFarrel’swetlandcomplexis878.5 NAVD88). Theprojectwillnotimpacttheregulatoryfloodplain. 5. ErosionControl – Proposederosioncontrolmethodsincludesiltfence, arockconstruction entrance, inletprotectionandriprap. AnNPDESpermitisrequiredfortheproject. The informationlistedundertheErosionandSedimentationControlRecommendationsmustbe submitted. Otherwise, theprojectcomplieswithRCWDRuleDrequirements. 6. DocumentingEasementsandMaintenance Obligations – Applicantmustprovidedraftdrainage andflowageeasements (ifrequiredbytheCity), andadraftmaintenance declarationforreview, andreceiptshowingrecordationonceapproved. 7. PreviousPermitInformation – Awetland delineationwasconductedforthesiteunderreview file14-169R. HoustonEngineering Inc Page4of4 2/25/2015 February 25, 2015 Ryan Streff City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: VALENTINE BLUFF Dear Mr. Streff, I have reviewed the proposed plans to develop 1901 and 1941 County Road E2. The site plans shows four driveway accesses to County Road E2. Three of the proposed driveways are shared driveways. The developer contacted me to discuss the site options and it was agreed that the County would approve a layout showing shared driveways. The proposed plan is acceptable to the County. The developer should be aware that any disturbance occurring within the County right of way will require a permit. Sincerely, Erin Laberee, PE Traffic Engineer Memorandum SRF No. 0148723 To: Ryan Streff, City Planner City of Arden Hills From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate SRF Consulting Group Date: February 26, 2015 Subject: Valentine Bluff (formerly Valentine Cove) Traffic/Site Review – Addendum Introduction As requested, SRF has completed an addendum to the Valentine Bluff (formerly Valentine Cove) Traffic/Site Review, dated December 23, 2014. The proposed development is generally located north of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection, on the site of the former Arden Hills Library and adjacent church in the City of Arden Hills. The main objective of this addendum is to address recent changes to the site plan. The following information summarizes the assumptions, analysis, and results of this review. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our review of the updated site plan, the following items (also illustrated in the attachment) are offered for consideration: • The proposed number of single-family dwelling units has changed from eight (8) units to seven (7) units from the previous analysis. No significant impacts to the previous analysis and/or area traffic operations are expected. • Realign the western driveway between Lot 1 and 2 across from New Brighton Road to reduce the intersection/driveway skew. The north and south through lanes from New Brighton Road should align with the driveway if possible. • Consider signing the driveway between Lot 1 and 2 as "private" to avoid driver confusion. • Restripe the south approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection to include a northbound shared left-/through lane and a dedicated right-turn lane. • Remove the crosswalk on County Road E2 which is currently located approximately 100 feet east of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection. • Extend the trail connection to the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection and add a crosswalk on the west side of the intersection. H:\Projects\8723\TS\Report\8723_ArdenHills_ValentineBluffTrafficStudy_Addendum_150226.docx ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 | 763.475.0010 | WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Ex t e n d t r a i l co n n e c t i o n t o t h e CR E / N e w B r i g h t o n Ro a d i n t e r s e c t i o n an d a d d a cr o s s w a l k o n t h e we s t s i d e o f t h e in t e r s e c t i o n . Re m o v e t h e o l d cr o s s w a l k XX Re a l i g n d r i v e w a y t o li m i t s k e w e d dr i v e w a y / in t e r s e c t i o n . N o r t h / so u t h t h r o u g h l a n e s fr o m N e w B r i g h t o n Ro a d s h o u l d a l i g n wi t h t h e d r i v e w a y i f po s s i b l e . M a y n e e d to s i g n t h i s d r i v e w a y as " p r i v a t e " . Wo u l d n e e d t o re s t r i p e / s i g n w i t h th e a p p r o p r i a t e la n e d e s i g n a t i o n s sh o w n . Memorandum SRF No. 0148723 To: Ryan Streff, City Planner City of Arden Hills From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate SRF Consulting Group Date: December 23, 2014 Subject: Arden Hills Valentine Cove Traffic/Site Review Introduction As requested, SRF has completed a traffic operations and site plan review of the proposed Valentine Cove residential development in the City of Arden Hills. The proposed development is generally located north of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection, on the site of the former Arden Hills Library and adjacent church. The main objectives of this review are to identify the change in trip generation from the existing facilities and recommend potential site plan improvements to consider, particularly with respect to pedestrian access and circulation. The following information summarizes the assumptions, analysis, and results of this review. Traffic Review To evaluate potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, existing area traffic volumes were reviewed and the proposed development trip generation was developed. Based on this information, a preliminary traffic analysis was completed. The results are summarized as follows: Existing Conditions • Both County Road E2 and New Brighton Road are two-lane undivided roadways. There are no dedicated turn lanes along County Road E2, however there are dedicated left- and right-turn lanes along New Brighton Road. • The County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection is unsignalized, allowing free flow movements along County Road E2. • Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes (provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation) along County Road E2 range from approximately 5,300 vehicles per day (vpd) to 7,600 vpd to the east and west of New Brighton Road, respectively. • Existing ADT volumes along New Brighton Road are approximately 2,200 vpd. • Historical ADT volumes along each roadway indicate relatively minimal changes over the past 20 years. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 | 763.475.0010 | WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Ryan Streff December 23, 2014 City of Arden Hills Page 2 Proposed Development Trip Generation • The proposed development is located on the site of the former Arden Hills Library (approximately 10,000 square feet) and a small community church (approximately 5,500 square feet), both of which are currently vacant or underutilized. • The proposed development, shown in Figure 1, would replace the library and church facilities with eight (8) single-family homes. • A trip generation comparison between the existing land uses and proposed development shown in Table 1 was completed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition. Table 1. Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size A.M Peak Hour Trips P.M Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips In Out In Out Existing Uses Library (590) – VACANT 10,000 S.F. 7 3 35 38 562 Church (560) - VACANT 5,500 S.F. 2 1 1 2 50 Total Existing Potential 9 4 36 40 612 Proposed Use Single-Family Homes (210) 8 units 2 5 5 3 76 Change from Existing Potential -7 +1 -31 -37 -536 • Results of the trip generation comparison indicate that the proposed development will generate approximately seven (7) a.m. peak hour, eight (8) p.m. peak hour, and 76 daily trips. • When compared to the potential trip generation of the existing land uses, the proposed development is expected to generate fewer trips. Traffic Operations Review • A planning level ADT capacity review of the study area roadways was completed to determine if the change in use is expected to have an impact to area traffic operations. • This review indicated that two-lane facilities (such as County Road E2 and New Brighton Road) typically can accommodate up 10,000 vpd before improvements may be necessary. • Therefore based on the existing ADT volumes and the proposed development trip generation, no significant impacts to area traffic operations are expected. Ryan Streff December 23, 2014 City of Arden Hills Page 3 Site Plan Review Site Access • The proposed development site access is planned to create the north leg of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection. This access is ideally located from a traffic operations perspective to limit potential conflicts with adjacent intersections or driveways. The existing site access locations to library and church will be closed. • The south approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection should be restriped to accommodate the proposed north approach, as well as any signing modifications. o The south approach should be striped as a shared left-/through lane and a dedicated right- turn lane. The north approach can be constructed as a single lane. Pedestrian Facilities • Review of the site plan indicates that no pedestrian facilities (i.e. sidewalks) are planned for the proposed development. Given the relatively low volume and vehicular speeds anticipated within the proposed development, the lack of sidewalks is not expected to pose a significant issue. • It should be noted that there is a multi-use trail located along the south side of County Road E2, east of New Brighton Road. • To improve access to this pedestrian facility from the proposed development, an ADA compliant crosswalk should be considered to provide a more defined crossing location of County Road E2. o Given the location of the current multi-use trail, the crosswalk should be located on the east approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection. • A summary of the improvements offered for consideration is illustrated in Figure 2. Conclusions • Based on the existing ADT volumes and the proposed development trip generation, no significant impacts to area traffic operations are expected. • The south approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection should be restriped to accommodate the proposed north approach, as well as any signing modifications. o The south approach should be striped as a shared left-/through lane and a dedicated right- turn lane. The north approach can be constructed as a single lane. • Consider installing an ADA compliant crosswalk along the east approach of the County Road E2/New Brighton Road intersection. H:\Projects\8723\8723_ArdenHills_ValentineCoveTrafficStudy_141223.docx N O R T H No r t h 0148723 December 2014 Proposed Site Plan Figure 1 H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 8 7 2 3 \ T S \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 1 _ P r o p o s e d S i t e P l a n . c d r Arden Hills Valentine Cove Traffic/Site Review Arden Hills, MN N O R T H No r t h 0148723 December 2014 Improvements for Consideration Figure 2 H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 8 7 2 3 \ T S \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 2 _ I m p r o v e m e n t s f o r C o n s i d e r a t i o n . c d r Arden Hills Valentine Cove Traffic/Site Review Arden Hills, MN Install ADA Compliant CrosswalkRestripe/Sign the South Approach NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Pennington Sport UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: SPORT COURT: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,775 1,562 1,437 447 5,221 Two Story - 68’-6” 141 Wildwood Court Mahtomedi, MN NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Pennington Sport UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: SPORT COURT: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,775 1,562 1,437 447 5,221 Two Story - 68’-6” 141 Wildwood Court Mahtomedi, MN NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Pennington Sport UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: SPORT COURT: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,775 1,562 1,437 447 5,221 Two Story - 68’-6” 141 Wildwood Court Mahtomedi, MN NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Pennington Sport UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: SPORT COURT: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,775 1,562 1,437 447 5,221 Two Story - 68’-6” 141 Wildwood Court Mahtomedi, MN NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Westland Bonus UPPER: BONUS ROOM MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: GARAGE SF: Two Story - 63’-0” 16020 58th Place N Plymouth 1,605 465 1,708 1,477 5,255 766 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Westland Bonus UPPER: BONUS ROOM MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: GARAGE SF: Two Story - 63’-0” 16020 58th Place N Plymouth 1,605 465 1,708 1,477 5,255 766 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Westland Bonus UPPER: BONUS ROOM MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: GARAGE SF: Two Story - 63’-0” 16020 58th Place N Plymouth 1,605 465 1,708 1,477 5,255 766 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Westland Bonus UPPER: BONUS ROOM MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: GARAGE SF: Two Story - 63’-0” 16020 58th Place N Plymouth 1,605 465 1,708 1,477 5,255 766 SuperiorALL HAND DRAWN CONCEPTS ARE SHOWN WITH SOME “ARTISTIC LICENSE” USED. THESE ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ARTISTIC LICENSE:www.HANSONBUILDERS.com NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 Two Story - 59’-0” 16045 58th Place N Plymouth, MN UPPER: MAIN: SUMROOM: GARAGE: LOWER: LOWER UNFINISHED: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,680 1,435 144 741 1,234 190 4,493 SuperiorALL HAND DRAWN CONCEPTS ARE SHOWN WITH SOME “ARTISTIC LICENSE” USED. THESE ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ARTISTIC LICENSE:www.HANSONBUILDERS.com NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 Two Story - 59’-0” 16045 58th Place N Plymouth, MN UPPER: MAIN: SUMROOM: GARAGE: LOWER: LOWER UNFINISHED: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,680 1,435 144 741 1,234 190 4,493 SuperiorALL HAND DRAWN CONCEPTS ARE SHOWN WITH SOME “ARTISTIC LICENSE” USED. THESE ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ARTISTIC LICENSE:www.HANSONBUILDERS.com NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 Two Story - 59’-0” 16045 58th Place N Plymouth, MN UPPER: MAIN: SUMROOM: GARAGE: LOWER: LOWER UNFINISHED: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,680 1,435 144 741 1,234 190 4,493 SuperiorALL HAND DRAWN CONCEPTS ARE SHOWN WITH SOME “ARTISTIC LICENSE” USED. THESE ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ARTISTIC LICENSE:www.HANSONBUILDERS.com NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 Two Story - 59’-0” 16045 58th Place N Plymouth, MN UPPER: MAIN: SUMROOM: GARAGE: LOWER: LOWER UNFINISHED: TOTAL FINISHED: 1,680 1,435 144 741 1,234 190 4,493 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Bayfield UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 62’-0” 43 Monarch Way, North Oaks 2,087 1,780 1,57 4 5,441 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Bayfield UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 62’-0” 43 Monarch Way, North Oaks 2,087 1,780 1,57 4 5,441 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Bayfield UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 62’-0” 43 Monarch Way, North Oaks 2,087 1,780 1,57 4 5,441 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Bayfield UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 62’-0” 43 Monarch Way, North Oaks 2,087 1,780 1,57 4 5,441 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Crestview 3 UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 58’-0” 5925 Xene Lane Plymouth MN 2,024 1,760 1,517 5,301 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Crestview 3 UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 58’-0” 5925 Xene Lane Plymouth MN 2,024 1,760 1,517 5,301 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Crestview 3 UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 58’-0” 5925 Xene Lane Plymouth MN 2,024 1,760 1,517 5,301 NOTE: VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE. DAMAGES INCLUDE $100,000 STATUTORY COMPENSATIONS, REIMBURSEMENT FOR ALL PROFIT LOST AND COST OF ALL LEGAL FEES ON COPYRIGHTED PLANS. HANSON BUILDERS SECURES A FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ON ALL OF OUR PLANS. WE HAVE ENFORCED COPYRIGHTS ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON EACH OCCASION. www.HANSONBUILDERS.com C COPYRIGHT HANSON BUILDERS INC. 13 4 3 2 H A N S O N B L V D . AN D O V E R , M N 5 5 3 0 4 76 3 - 4 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 LI C . # 0 0 0 4 5 6 8 Crestview 3 UPPER: MAIN: LOWER: TOTAL FINISHED: Two Story - 58’-0” 5925 Xene Lane Plymouth MN 2,024 1,760 1,517 5,301 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS 251.7 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet251.70125.83 1941 and 1901 County Road E2 1,5101: This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 1,135.1 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet1,135.10567.54 Notes Enter Map Description Legend City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries From:Jill Hutmacher To:Ryan Streff ; Matthew Bachler Subject:FW: a letter in support of County Road E2 building Date:Monday, March 16, 2015 8:35:49 PM From: Kristine Poelzer [mailto:kpoelzer@msn.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 6:00 PM To: Jill Hutmacher Subject: a letter in support of County Road E2 building Hello Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director of Arden Hills Kindly confirm receipt of this email. Please give me this opportunity to engage in discussion of the future of Arden Hills residents. This email is in support of the proposed residential building of 7 homes along County Road E2 near the New Brighton Road intersection. This topic is an agenda item for the March 30, 2015 Arden Hills Council meeting. My husband, Clark, and I have lived in our home (1870 Indian Place, Arden Hills) for more than 30 years, and my husband has lived in Arden Hills since the early 1950’s. We raised our two children here. We enjoy the location for many reasons, especially with trails and multiple parks as well as residing in the Mounds View school district. I reviewed the attachments of the March 4th Planning Commission agenda and attended that meeting to find out more about the proposed project and to speak in its support. The project is better than I anticipated. I am happy to learn that the plan adds to the environmental quality of the wetland and the very ‘green’ energy related aspects of each of the homes. It is also good to know that this creative plan for 7 homes will only add one more driveway as an exit/entry of County Road E2. The builder, Hanson Builders, Inc., has a much known high quality reputation in many Twin City communities for the past 35 years. The 7 homes proposed will greatly improve the view of the land as the library and its parking lot has sat vacant since the library opened in New Brighton. Also the adjacent building and parking lot I understand to be also vacant. It is important to keep in mind that this location is one of the gateways to the city. Additionally, as a member of the neighborhood, I would like to see the memory of the library turned into a community asset that has a tax paying role. My husband and I are considering ‘moving up’ to a larger home. Yet finding residential lots near our area is currently limited to Katie Lane. We would like the opportunity to consider one of the high quality homes proposed along the north of County Road E2 near the intersection of New Brighton Road. There is the possibility that our two adult children will live in this home with us. We see this as an opportunity to be a part of their lives and for them as a part of our lives into the future. Our daughter will then return to residing in Arden Hills, moving from Coon Rapids, bringing along her husband and two young children. I recommend and ask for your support of this building project. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristine Poelzer home phone 651-633-1127 kpoelzer@msn.com A copy of this email went to the Mayor and all Councilmembers Confidentiality Statement: The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – 9A MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-002 Applicant: Wellington Management, Inc Property Location: 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North Request: Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment Requested Action 1. Motion to approve Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the twelve (12) conditions in the March 30, 2015, Report to the City Council. 2. Motion to continue consideration of Planning Case 15-002 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North to the April 13, 2015, Regular City Council meeting. Background The City Council reviewed Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUD), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment for the Arden Plaza retail center at their Regular Meeting on February 23, 2015. The Council voted to table this request to allow the applicant time to provide the City with information on the business plan for the Frattallone’s Ace Hardware Store and to address alternative options for exterior storage and seasonal outdoor displays on the property. At the Work Session on March 16, 2015, the City Council reviewed a proposed Garden Center/Outdoor Seasonal Sales Display Site Plan submitted by Frattallone’s Ace Hardware. The Site Plan addressed the proposed location of exterior storage, outdoor displays and sales, and trash and recycling collection on the property. Staff has since met with the applicant to discuss City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 1 of 9 the feedback provided at the Work Session and has determined that additional time is needed to further refine the garden center Site Plan prior to City Council consideration. However, the applicant desires to proceed with other aspects of the application in order to facilitate a pending land sale for a new business. After reviewing the applicant’s request, staff is recommending that the City Council take separate action at the meeting on March 30, 2015 on the components of Planning Case 15-002 not pertaining to the proposed Frattallone’s outdoor seasonal sales area. These components include the Preliminary Plat for the Arden Plaza subdivision and the PUD Amendment, which would account for the subdivision, increase the footprint for Building #4, and modify the parking lot at the north and south end of the retail center. Approval of these parts of the application would allow the pending sale by Wellington Management of the proposed Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition, which will otherwise be delayed until approval of the subdivision plans. Consideration of the remaining requests in Planning Case 15-002 relating to the expansion of the Frattallone’s outdoor seasonal sales area would be delayed to the April 13, 2015, Regular City Council meeting. At that time, the City Council could consider approval of a PUD Amendment and CUP Amendment for the expanded seasonal sales area. A PUD Amendment is needed as part of the April 13 request due to the parking lot modifications associated with the garden center. The City Attorney has reviewed the course of action being proposed by staff for City Council consideration of Planning Case 15-002 and concurs with the staff recommendation. A revised plan set has been submitted by the applicant removing the proposed expanded garden center from the Master Site Plan (Attachment C). The plan depicts the approximate boundaries of the Frattallone’s outdoor seasonal sales area that was approved by Conditional Use Permit in Planning Case 97-009. Overview of Request The first component of the application is the Preliminary Plat to subdivide Lot 3 within the existing Arden Plaza Plat into three separate parcels. The proposed Final Plat name for the subdivision would be Arden Plaza 2nd Addition. Frattallone’s Ace Hardware, which is a current tenant in the retail center, has approached Wellington Management regarding the purchase of its store and the existing outdoor seasonal sales area. To accommodate this, Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition would be created comprised of the Frattallone’s portion of the building, the area now occupied by the seasonal sales area, and related parking and service areas. The second lot created by the subdivision, Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition, would be comprised of the remaining retail center, the primary parking area, access drives on County Road E and Lexington Avenue, and the stormwater pond at the southeast corner of the site. The lot line between the retail center on Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition and the Frattallone’s Ace Hardware store on Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition would be defined by a demising wall, which is a City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 2 of 9 common wall used by separate real estate entities erected on a line dividing two parcels of land. The City Building Official has been working with the property owner on the specifications of the demising wall and building permits will be required prior to construction. Approval of the Final Plat will be conditioned on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed remodeling work. The Final Plat will be brought back to the City Council for approval once the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The third lot, Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition, is located on Lexington Avenue and would include the future Building #4, which is proposed to be constructed in Phase III of the redevelopment. The proposed footprint of Building #4 has increased from the approved Master PUD. The submitted master site plan indicates that this building would be 20,136 square feet in size, an increase of 2,136 square feet from the 2009 PUD approval. Wellington Management is requesting an amendment to the Master PUD to address the following four items: 1. Account for the subdivision of Lot 3 within the existing Arden Plaza Plat into three separate lots. 2. Allow for the creation of a non-conforming parcel (Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition) that does not have frontage on a public street. 3. Increase the size of Building #4 on the proposed Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition from 18,000 square feet, as approved in Planning Case 09-011, to 20,136 square feet. 4. Modify the parking lot layout in the Master Site Plan to retain 12 existing parking stalls at the north end of the retail center and accurately account for the outdoor seasonal sales area footprint approved in Planning Case 97-009. Plan Evaluation A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission at their February 4 2015, Regular Meeting. The staff report to the Planning Commission on this case is included in Attachment E. The following section provides a summary of the main topics discussed by the Planning Commission and areas where flexibility from the Zoning Code is needed through the PUD process. Subdivision Code Review The three new lots within the proposed Arden Plaza 2nd Addition Final Plat would meet the Zoning Code requirements in terms of lot width, depth, and area. Lots 1 and 2 abut their full right-of-way frontage on a publicly dedicated street. However, the proposed Lot 3 is an interior parcel with no frontage on a public street. This lot is entitled to street access under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement that has been recorded with Ramsey County. The applicant has requested flexibility through the PUD Amendment process for creating the nonconforming Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 3 of 9 The Planning Commission recommended as a condition of approval that prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of a supplemental declaration between Frattallone’s Hardware and Arden Plaza, LLC be provided to the City documenting how driveway maintenance and shared utilities between the two lots will be addressed. Zoning Code Review A. Structure Coverage and Landscaping Since the PUD encompasses all five lots within the retail center, the plans were evaluated based on whether the development as a whole conforms to the B-2 District structure and landscape coverage requirements. The maximum permitted structure coverage in the district is 45 percent. A total of 93,118 square feet of building area is proposed across the five lots, for coverage of 19.4 percent. To date, 66,982 square feet of building area has been constructed on the site. Properties must maintain minimum landscape coverage of 20 percent. The development as a whole would include 114,046 square feet of landscaped area, or 23.76 percent of the total area. Total Area (square feet) Structure Coverage (square feet) Structure Coverage (percentage) Landscape Coverage (square feet) Landscape Coverage (percentage) Lot 1, Arden Plaza (Walgreens Pharmacy) 76,533 14,572 19.04% 16,515 21.58% Lot 2, Arden Plaza (Future Building #2) 27,853 6,000 21.54% 7,221 25.93% Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition (Future Building #4) 37,732 20,136 53.37% 7,089 18.79% Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition (Building #5 - Retail Center) 274,548 35,647 12.98% 76,670 27.91% Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition (Building #5 - Frattallone’s) 63,325 16,763 26.47% 6,551 10.37% Total (PC #15-002) 479,991 93,118 19.40% 114,046 23.76% Approved PUD Amendment (PC #11-016) 479,991 92,748 19.32% 112,781 23.50% B-2 Zoning District Requirements 13,000 45% or less 20% or more City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 4 of 9 B. Setbacks A zero-foot setback is proposed along the side lot line of Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition and Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition since the subdivision includes a property line through the existing retail building. The Zoning Code allows for exceptions from side setback requirements provided that a proper demising wall is used and if the adjacent buildings are constructed as an integral unit. The City Building Official has been working with the property owner on the details of the demising wall. Building permits will be required prior to any construction on the site. C. Landscaping A Landscaping Plan for the entire development was approved in Planning Case 09-011. For each phase of the Master PUD, the property owner will be required to install the improvements shown on the Landscaping Plan. The plan includes the installation of parking lot islands within the main parking area, which has not yet been completed. The Planning Commission recommended as a condition of approval that the property owner be required to complete these parking lot landscaping improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Building #2 (Phase II) or Building #4 (Phase III). The proposed amendment would not modify the Landscaping Plan other than a reduction in the parking lot islands. The Zoning Code requires that ten percent of a parking area be occupied by planting islands that include one tree and are a minimum of 150 square feet in size. Three planting islands have been removed on the south end of the site adjacent to the outdoor seasonal sales area approved in Planning Case 97-009. This has resulted in a reduction in the planting island area from 10.5 percent to 9.5 percent. D. Parking Since tenants for the future development phases have yet to be determined it is difficult to calculate the number of required parking spaces for the retail center based on the Zoning Code regulations. The Master PUD assumes that a retail tenant would occupy the 20,136 square foot Building #4 on Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition and that a restaurant use would be located in the 6,000 square foot Building #2 on Lot 2, Arden Plaza. For the purpose of this evaluation, staff assumed that all buildings would have the same percentage of gross retail sales floor area as the Walgreens Pharmacy at 80 percent. Based on this, the total number of parking stalls required for the site would be 497 spaces. This calculation does not take into account the shared parking agreement that allows users to park anywhere on the site and walk to their destination. The current Master Plan for the site, as amended in Planning Case 11-016, includes 439 stalls. The proposed PUD Amendment would modify the parking area slightly for a total of 440 stalls. The Master Site Plan shows 15 parking stalls being removed from the southern end of the retail center to more accurately account for the approved outdoor seasonal sales area footprint. An City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 5 of 9 additional 16 stalls would be retained within the retail center resulting in an overall net increase of one parking space. Structure Coverage (square feet) Required Retail Parking (1 stall/150 sq. ft. gross sales floor area) Lot 1, Arden Plaza Plat (Walgreens) 14,572 78 Lot 2, Arden Plaza Plat (Future Building #2) 6,000 32 Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition Plat (Building #5 – Retail Center) 35,801 191 Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition Plat (Building #5 – Frattallone’s) 16,609 89 Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition Plat (Future Building #4) 20,136 107 Total Required Parking 497 Proposed Parking Stalls (PC 15-002) 440 PUD Amendment (PC 11-016) 439 Additional Review City Building Official and City Engineer The Building Official has provided comments included in the attached memo dated January 29, 2015 (Attachment D). The Planning Commission recommended as a condition of approval that the final plans for the demising wall between Frattallone’s Hardware and the Arden Plaza building meet the standards outlined in this memo. The City Engineer has provided comments included in the attached memo dated January 13, 2015. Those comments related to specific site operation requirements were recommended as conditions of approval by the Planning Commission. Lake Johanna Fire Department The Fire Marshal has provided comments included in the attached memo date January 12, 2015. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 15-002 at their regular meeting on February 4, 2015. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment F. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: Subdivision Findings 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat for the property at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 6 of 9 2. The subdivision would create three new parcels: Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition. 3. The proposed Lot 1, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition and Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition are in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code. 4. The proposed Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition is not in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code because it is an interior parcel with no frontage on a publicly dedicated street. 5. The proposed Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition is entitled to access and parking under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement (Doc. No. 2156888) that has been recorded against the property with Ramsey County. 6. The applicant has requested flexibility through the PUD Amendment process for the proposed nonconforming Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition. PUD Amendment Findings 7. The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the Master PUD for Arden Plaza property. 8. The original Master PUD for the development was approved in Planning Case #09-011. A subsequent PUD Amendment was approved in Planning Case #11-016. 9. The PUD Amendment is being requested in order to accommodate the proposed subdivision, to increase the size of Building #4 to be constructed in Phase III, and to allow for minor modifications to the existing parking lot. 10. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. 11. The Arden Plaza development is located in the B-2 General Business District. 12. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District that outlines future development principles for the area. 13. The City has adopted Design Standards for the B-2 District within the Zoning Code. 14. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City’s Zoning Code. 15. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. 16. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 17. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended approval (4-2, Zimmerman and Bartel) of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North. The Planning Commission recommends that the twelve (12) conditions listed below be included in an approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment requests specifically. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 7 of 9 The Planning Commission recommended an additional ten (10) conditions pertaining to the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for the proposed expanded outdoor seasonal sales area. These conditions would be considered separately by the City Council at the meeting on April 13, 2015. 1. Prior to City Council review of Planning Case 15-002, the issue regarding the design and location of the demising wall between Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition and Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Fire Marshal. 2. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of all previous Master PUD Agreements, permits, and reviews, except as hereinafter amended. 3. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. 4. A Development Agreement Amendment shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The agreement shall be executed by all parties within the Arden Plaza development prior to the issuance of any building or development permits. 5. The final construction plans for the demising wall between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building shall meet the standards as outlined by the City Building Official in the memo dated January 29, 2015. 6. The execution of the Final Plat shall be conditioned on the demising wall construction between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building receiving final approval from the City Building Official. 7. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of the supplemental declaration between Frattallone’s Hardware and Arden Plaza, LLC addressing the issues of drainage and driveway maintenance shall be provided to the City. 8. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the Sewer and Water services provided to Lot 3, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition through the building on Lot 2, Arden Plaza 2nd Addition shall be provided to the City. 9. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the operation, maintenance, and ownership of all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer within the development, and the process by which future land use applications will be submitted to the City for properties within the development, shall be provided to the City. 10. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the date of the City’s approval of the Final Plat. An extension request must be submitted in writing to the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date. 11. The City currently holds a Letter of Credit (American Bank Letter of Credit No. 2527) for the patching and seal coating of the parking lot next to the Frattallone’s Hardware store. This work shall be completed by September 30, 2015 or the LOC maturity date shall be extended. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 8 of 9 12. The applicant shall construct the main parking area and landscaping improvements previously planned for Phase I prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Building #2 or Building #4. Options 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Approve the proposal with conditions (Recommended Action). 3. Deny the application with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, “…it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request.” 4. Table for additional information. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 5, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 6, 2015 (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The petitioner was notified on February 24, 2015, of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by May 5, 2015 (120 days). The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application and Project Narrative B. Site and Aerial Maps C. Plan Set (Preliminary and Final Plat, Master Site Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, and Parking and Circulation Plan) D. Additional Review Comments (City Building Official, City Engineer, Lake Johanna Fire Department) E. Planning Commission Report, February 4, 2015 F. Draft Planning Commission Minutes, February 4, 2015 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 30, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 9 of 9 1 Project Narrative Arden Plaza – Subdivision January 5, 2015 History Arden Plaza LLC submitted and received approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2009, with a revised pharmacy development plan and recorded plat in 2011, followed by final construction plans of Phase 1 improvements in 2012. The 2009 approved master plan included 97,035 sf of retail/commercial buildings (including a 3,917 sf mezzanine for the Frattallone’s Hardware store offices) and had originally subdivided the parcels into four lots. In 2011, two of the lots in the northeast corner were combined and platted as a single lot, for a development of a Walgreen’s pharmacy, thus 3 lots were officially platted in 2011 showing four building masses involving the Arden Plaza Plat. Phase 1 Construction of the Arden Plaza site included the Walgreen’s building and parcel (Lot 1 in the northeast corner), and included the implementation of the four required storm water rain gardens (bio‐filtration basins) for the full development, along with modified parking and circulation improvements involving the northeast parcel. Subdivision and Platting Since the 2011 plat and the 2012 construction project, Frattallone’s Hardware has approached Arden Plaza LLC, about purchasing its store and garden area, and the land upon which it is located. Arden Plaza LLC. has agreed to the request and while platting the Frattallone parcel, Arden Plaza, LLC is also applying to plat the lot for Building #4 along Lexington Avenue. Thus the subdivision request is going from 3 lots to a total of 5 lots, with the current Lot 3 being subdivided into 3 separate parcels. The new Lot 3 will encompass the remaining strip retail center, primary parking, access drives, and regional storm pond. The new Lot 4 will be comprised of the Frattallone building (via a demising wall), their seasonal sales area, and other related parking and service areas. The new Lot 5 will include the future Building #4 (up to 18,000sf) along Lexington Avenue and some minor related parking. The Frattallone lot line is defined by the hardware store common demising wall, as surveyed. We are making application for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat. Lot 4 (Frattallone) is technically non‐conforming due to not abutting the public ROW however it does have access and easements for ingress and egress via the 2011 Reciprocal Easement Agreement recorded as document no. 2156888The request for flexibility for this item is identified in the PUD Amendment. PUD Amendment The current revisions to the site and parcel subdivision will require a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The changes from the 2009 PUD plan and 2011 PUD plan primarily include the new property lots, Frattallone seasonal sales changes along with the related parking modifications; and the parking lot modification (to keep existing parking) at the north end of the existing retail strip building. A PUD Amendment application is being submitted. Some specific changes to the 2009 PUD plan include the following: Number of lots: went from 3 platted to 5 total lots. Also, Lot 4 (Frattallone), does not abut a public ROW, per code, so asking for flexibility for this configuration. The Frattallone lot is 2 entitled to access and parking via the existing shared parking and access easement document already recorded in public records and approved by the City Attorney in 2011. Landscape in Parking Area: went from required 10% (10.5% was originally provided in the plans) to 9.5%. The reason for the decrease is in large part due to the reconfiguration of parking required by the Frattallone seasonal sales area. We believe that the new seasonal sales area proposed will be an attractive addition for the shopping center, and the remaining features in the reconfigured parking will provide adequate traffic calming and an aesthetically pleasing face to the center parking. Parking Total: Reduced from 455 Spaces approved to 440 Spaces provided, primarily reflecting the changes involving the hardware store seasonal sales area. Frattallone Seasonal Sales Area: This is not shown on the 2009 or 2011 PUD plans but was permitted under a conditional use permit. A curbed display area and perimeter fence is being proposed to show a more defined area for this use. Existing Conditions The owners completed the Phase 1 construction improvements in 2012, and current existing conditions from the past as‐built surveys, along with new 2014 survey data of the existing retail area and Frattallone hardware store demising wall are all included in the submission materials. PUD Site Plan As described in the PUD Amendment section above, we are requesting changes to the PUD Master Site Plan to reflect changes for the Frattallone Store and Seasonal Sales area and related parking, which includes reduction in parking, wider perimeter drive aisle, parking modification, and parking lot light relocation. The parking at the north end of the in‐line strip retail which is critical to the center, is now scheduled to remain, where the previous plan removed a row of parking along the building. Also, the Walgreen’s site is updated per as‐built conditions. Frattallone Seasonal Sales Area The seasonal sales area for the Frattallone Hardware store is approximately 150’x56’, including the existing canopy. The front doors are outside of the seasonal sales area. The fencing for the seasonal sales area is black, 6’ high, and is ornamental metal pickets on the north and east sides, and vinyl coated chain‐link fence on the south. There are multiple sliding gates for access and service. The existing bituminous pavement surface that currently stores Frattallone pallets will be removed and replaced with concrete, and will also have a 5’ wide curbed concrete display area along just the ornamental fence sections (north and east). Two parking lot lights will be located at the south perimeter of the parking area, to assist with lighting the service drive aisle, otherwise the garden center itself will not have any permanent lights, only temporary light, as needed, for the different displays (such as Christmas trees). PUD Grading and Erosion Control Plan Minimal changes to the plan. Basically the future parking islands and seasonal sales area will be cut into the existing pavement, and have slight grade modification for positive drainage. The drainage inlets and ponding to remain the same. Future Building #4 and related grading with the existing retaining wall will be addressed when that area is constructed. PUD Utility Plan. Minimal to no changes to the plan. Water and sanitary stubs are already provided to the two future building pad sites. The existing 27” and 30” storm sewer, near future Building #4, will remain unless future development requires a change. 3 PUD Parking and Circulation Plan and REA Parking and Access for the parcels are currently covered under the existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement (the shared access and parking easement document) that was approved by the City Attorney in 2011. The access and parking for all 5 Lots to be platted and for the buildings to be constructed in the future are currently provided for in the Reciprocal Easement Agreement. No amendments or additions are required for access and parking for the 5 lots and future buildings. The site has similar circulation to the previous PUD, and semi‐truck turning diagrams have been provided on the plans show its movements. The trucks maneuver around the seasonal sales areas without any impact, but please note that the existing truck route around the existing parking on the north end can have a potential impact on three stalls of the existing striped parking, but, as a practical matter, this potential impact has never been a problem for current truck circulation. Staging of Development No construction permits are being requested at this time for Phase 2 (Building #2) or Phase 3 (Building #4) of the development. The Frattallone Seasonal Sales area is being scheduled for implementation in 2015. The remaining parking lot islands, and any remaining items, are scheduled for implementation when both Phase 2 and 3 are completed. Interior Required Improvements As part of the Frattallone subdivision and plat, discussions and resolutions have been made with the City Building official. It has been determined that the common demising wall will need to be a 2‐hour fire rating, which basically requires the addition of sheet rock to the hardware store (south) side of the wall. The fire sprinkler watermain will be extended to the remaining unsprinkled tenants, with each space adding a sprinkler system during the next tenant build‐out. Rice Creek Watershed District During application with the City of Arden Hills, communication will be made to Rice Creek Watershed District to see if any permits would be required for the seasonal sales area improvements. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 600.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet600.00300.00 Arden Plaza Retail Center 3,600 Enter Map Description Notes This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 400.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet400.00200.00 Arden Plaza Retail Center 2,400 Enter Map Description Notes Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 7 6 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 E d e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 76 9 9 A n a g r a m D r i v e Ed e n P r a i r i e , M N 5 5 3 4 4 Ph o n e (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 Fa x (9 5 2 ) 9 3 7 - 5 8 2 2 (8 8 8 ) 9 3 7 - 5 1 5 0 x x x x x January 29, 2015 Re: 3527 Lexington Ave: This letter is a review of a request for a proposed alternate to the State Building code at 3527 Lexington Ave. The purpose of the proposed code alternate is to divide an existing building and parcel into two distinct separate buildings and parcels. The 2007 MN state building code per the 2006 IBC requires walls located on property lines, that separate buildings, to be constructed as a fire wall. The existing wall is not built as a fire wall, but could be altered to comply with a 2 hour fire barrier wall. The proposed code alternate uses IBC Section 402,which refers to covered mall buildings. The proposed alternate is to apply section 402 to a strip or open mall. While section 402 of the 2006 IBC refers only to covered mall buildings, staff feels that an open, or strip mall is no more hazardous than a covered mall. In fact, it is more likely safer than an enclosed mall. It is proposed to use IBC section 402.7.4, as amended by the state, which allows an anchor building in a covered mall to be separated by a fire barrier instead of a fire wall. Additionally, MN State building code section 402.7.4, allows property lines to be platted between the anchor building and the rest of the mall with certain conditions. Section 402.7.4 also states that both buildings/parcels need to comply with all applicable provisions of the state building code. Section 402.8 of the state building code requires mall buildings to be fire sprinkler protected. Arden Plaza currently is only 65% fire sprinkler protected. The owners of the mall are proposing to extend a fire sprinkler main pipe through the unsprinklered tenant portions of the building. The individual tenant spaces will then be fully sprinklered as the tenant spaces changes ownership. City staff, along with the Lake Johanna Fire Department, have reviewed this project and have the following requirements for this project to move forward. 1. The wall separating the hardware store from the rest of the building needs to be a fully compliant two hour fire barrier with no openings. 2. Plans submitted do not show the fire wall including the loading dock area. Resubmit plans showing the loading dock included with the hardware store and separated from the remainder of the building by a fire barrier. 3. Verify the mezzanine in Ace hardware complies with type of construction for a type IIB. 4. Provide plans and specifications for the extension of the fire suppression main through the portion of the building currently not fire sprinklered. City of Arden Hills ▪1245 West Highway 96 ▪ Arden Hills Minnesota 55112 Phone 651.792.7800 ▪ Fax 651.634.5137 ▪ www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us 5. The fire suppression main piping is to be completed before final approval of the plat for closing or an escrow for 125% of the installation will be required. 6. Each individual tenant space currently not fire sprinklered will be brought fully compliant according to NFPA 13 upon any of the following conditions. 1) A new tenant. 2) The tenant space is altered or remodeled more than 50% of the space. 3) The tenant space is expanded. 7. Recorded with each of the deeds are agreements that require the buildings divided by property lines to be in conformance with the applicable provisions of the state building code, as if the buildings were a single building on a single piece of property. In addition, the agreement must state that no individual building or property owner may modify any portion of the building in any way that would not comply with the state building code. (Per IBC 402.7.4 as amended by the state) 8. All current life safety measures, both active and passive to be fully operational as originally installed. This includes but not limited to, all penetrations and or alterations to existing fire ratings of walls, corridors, and floor systems. They are to be inspected and repaired to the buildings original condition. 9. The installation of a fully addressable fire detection and alarm system according to NFPA 72 throughout the building. Fire Dept. to approved plans prior to installation.) 10. Attached are the related code sections and code analysis plan of Arden Plaza 11. Both the City and Fire Department to inspect and approve the above items before issuance of any certificate of occupancy. Sincerely, Dave Scherbel, Building Official Tim Boehlke, Lake Johanna Fire Chief Rick Current, Lake Johanna Fire Marshal City of Arden Hills ▪1245 West Highway 96 ▪ Arden Hills Minnesota 55112 Phone 651.792.7800 ▪ Fax 651.634.5137 ▪ www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us . P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-15-0100 arden plaza PUD\01-13-15 plan review.doc Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2015 TO: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner FROM: John M. Anderson, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Arden Plaza – PUD (PC 15-002)(PW-15-0100) I have reviewed the plans for the Arden Plaza PUD Amendment. The plans were prepared by Westwood and are dated 1/05/15. The following are my comments: 1. Grading shown in the PUD plans is understood to be conceptual, any construction will require detailed grading and erosion control plans, calculations and permits 2. Sewer and Water services for Lot 4 is provided thru the building on Lot 3 and, a recorded agreement will need to be in place for the operation, maintenance and ownership of this service. 3. All sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer on this site is privately owned and maintained, a recorded agreement will need to be in place for the operation, maintenance and ownership of these systems. 4. The utility plans should show the irrigation service near the center of the site. 5. The Utility plans should show the fire protection service location as it enters the building on Lot 3 6. The operation of the storm water treatment system has not gone as planned. There is water that sits in the bio filtration area #2 for long periods of time. This operation needs to be resolved to the satisfaction of the City and Rice Creek Watershed district before any land use change takes place. MEMORANDUM DATE: February 4, 2015 PC Agenda Item 4.C TO: Planning Commission FROM: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-002 - Public Hearing Required Applicant: Wellington Management, Inc Property Location: 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North Request: Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment Requested Action Wellington Management has requested a Preliminary and Final Plat in order to subdivide the existing Lot 3 within the Arden Plaza subdivision into three different parcels. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment is also being requested to accommodate the proposed subdivision, to include an expanded outdoor seasonal sales area on the site, to increase the size of Building #4 to be constructed in Phase III, and to allow for minor modifications to the existing parking lot. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment is also requested to reflect the proposed changes to the current CUP for the existing outdoor seasonal sales area. Background The City Council approved a redevelopment proposal for the Arden Plaza retail center in 2009 in Planning Case 09-011. The approved Master PUD included the demolition of an existing office complex, the subdivision of the parcel into four lots, and the construction of four new buildings over three phases. A total of 97,035 square feet of retail and commercial building space was approved for the Master PUD. Phase I of the PUD, which included the development of a pharmacy in place of the office building at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road E, was also approved as part of this planning case. A subsequent PUD Amendment in 2011 (Planning Case 11-016) included a revised plat that combined two of the lots in the northeast corner of the site into a single lot for the development of the existing Walgreens Pharmacy. Phase I of the Master PUD was largely completed in 2012, and included the construction of the Walgreens building, modifications to parking and City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 1 of 16 circulation within the retail center area, and the construction of stormwater bio-filtration basins required for the proposed build-out of the site. Prior to the City’s approval of the Master PUD for the retail center, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request from Frattallone’s Hardware was approved in Planning Case 97-009 for fencing a part of the parking lot on the property to allow for an seasonal garden sales area. A CUP was required because the Zoning Code does not specifically allow or prohibit outdoor garden sales area as a use. The seasonal outdoor sales area continues to operate on the property, although the area was never fenced off as proposed and its footprint has expanded beyond what was originally approved by the City in the CUP. The Master PUD and subsequent amendment, along with the associated plans and the conditions of approval, remain valid. The Master Site Plan approved in Planning Case 09-011 and the revised Preliminary Plat from Planning Case 11-016 are both included in Attachment D for reference. Neither Phase II nor Phase III of the approved Master PUD is being reviewed as part of this amendment request. The buildings included in these future phases would return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to development. 1. Overview of Request The first component of the application is the Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide Lot 3 within the existing Arden Plaza plat into three separate parcels. Frattallone’s Hardware, which is a current tenant in the retail center, has approached Wellington Management regarding the purchase of its store and the existing outdoor garden center. To accommodate this, a new Lot 4 would be created comprised of the Frattallone’s portion of the building, the area occupied by the outdoor seasonal sales area, and related parking and service areas. The new Lot 3 would be comprised of the remaining retail center, the primary parking area, access drives on County Road E and Lexington Avenue, and the stormwater pond at the southeast corner of the site. The common lot line between the remaining portion of the retail building on Lot 3 and the Frattallone’s Hardware store on Lot 4 would be defined by a demising wall. The definition of a demising wall is a wall used jointly by two parties erected upon a line dividing two parcels of land, each of which is a separate real estate entity. The City Building Official and the Lake Johanna Fire Department have been working with the property owner on the specifications of the demising wall and final building permits will be required prior to construction. Approval of the Final Plat will be conditioned on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed remodeling work. The new Lot 5 would include the future Building #4, which is proposed to be constructed in Phase III of the approved Master PUD, along with a small parking area. Lot 5 is located along Lexington Avenue. The proposed footprint of Building #4 has increased from the Master PUD approved in 2009. The submitted master site plan indicates that this building would be 20,136 square feet in size, an increase of 2,136 square feet from the 2009 PUD approval. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 2 of 16 Wellington Management is requesting an amendment to the Master PUD to address the following items: • Account for the subdivision of Lot 3 within Arden Plaza into three separate lots. • Allow for the creation of a non-conforming parcel (Lot 4) that does not have frontage on a publicly dedicated street. • Include the proposed permanent outdoor seasonal sales area on Lot 4 within the Master Site Plan. • Increase the size of Building #4 on the proposed Lot 5 from 18,000 square feet, as approved in Planning Case 09-011, to 20,136 square feet. • Minor modification to the parking lot at the north end of the retail center to retain 12 existing parking stalls that are shown being removed on the Master Site Plan. The proposed amendments in this case only relate to the Master PUD for the site. Detailed Final PUD plans will be submitted prior to the approval of Building #2 on Lot 2 and Building #4 on Lot 5. The submitted plans include a detailed Site Plan for the Frattallone’s seasonal sales area. The proposed outdoor garden center would measure 150 feet by 56 feet for a total area of 8,400 square feet. The existing bituminous surface on which the outdoor sales area is now located would be replaced with a four inch high concrete display curb. Fencing along the perimeter of the area would help define and separate the space from the adjacent parking and service areas. A six-foot tall ornamental fence is proposed along the north and east sides of the sales area and an eight-foot tall chain link fence on the south side. The CUP for the outdoor garden center use approved in 1997 remains valid. However, the applicant is seeking approval to expand the overall area of this use on the site. The Zoning Code requires that any enlargement or intensification of a conditional use shall require an amended permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being requested. 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process: The Planned Unit Development process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for development that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may make exceptions to setbacks, lot coverage, parking requirements, signage, building materials, or landscaping requirements. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and improve the overall design of a project. While the PUD process allows the City to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any conditions imposed on the PUD must have a rational basis related to the expected impact of the development. A PUD cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 3 of 16 If a PUD is comprised of multiple lots, it is often treated as one continuous development. The development as a whole would be expected to meet the landscaping, stormwater, and other similar requirements. For example, one property in the PUD may have 60 percent building coverage, but the development as a whole may not exceed 50 percent building coverage to maintain conformance with the underlying zoning district. In order to maintain shared amenities such as parking spaces, access drives, and stormwater ponds the development is required to create a legal entity to manage and maintain the shared facilities. 3. Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Community Mixed Use B-2: General Business District Multi-Family Residential, Retail South Community Mixed Use B-2: General Business District Office East (Shoreview) Commercial C2: General Commercial & OFC: Office Gas Station/Retail/Office West Community Mixed Use B-2: General Business District Office 4. Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Retail/Commercial Zoning: B-2: General Business District Lot Size: 12.55 Acres (546,717) Topography: The elevation of the lot is lower than Lexington Avenue. There is a stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the property. Plan Evaluation 1. Chapter 11, Subdivision Code Review A. Lots The proposed Preliminary and Final Plat would create a single Block and five Lots. All lots within the plat meet the Zoning Code requirements in terms of lot width, depth, and area. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 5 abut by their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street. However, the proposed Lot 4 is an interior parcel with no frontage on a publicly dedicated street. This lot is entitled to access and parking under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement that has been recorded against the property with Ramsey County. The applicant has requested flexibility through the PUD Amendment process for creating the nonconforming Lot 4. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 4 of 16 B. Easements Drainage and utility easements have been provided on each lot and over delineated wetland areas in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Code. C. Public Use Dedication Staff has reviewed the files pertaining to this property and found documentation that the park dedication requirements included in the Subdivision Code were satisfied in conjunction with the original development of the site in 1973. No additional park dedication is required as a result of this application. All utility and drainage easements will be dedicated to the public as required by the Subdivision Code. D. Grading Minimal grading work is proposed in conjunction with the construction of the seasonal sales area. This work will mainly include cutting into the existing bituminous pavement. Detailed grading and erosion control plans, calculations, and permits will be required prior to any construction on the site. E. Utilities No additional utility development is planned at this time. Any proposal to expand utilities will be evaluated in conjunction with the proposed future phases of the Master PUD. Water and sanitary stubs have already been provided to the building sites on Lot 2 and Lot 5. Existing utility easements on the site will be maintained following the subdivision. 2. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review The Arden Plaza retail center is located in the B-2 General Business District. The approved PUD for the property acts as an additional governing document for the campus providing flexibility in certain areas which the underlying zoning regulations would not otherwise allow. The following section reviews the proposed PUD Amendment based on how it compares to the previous PUD approvals and the underlying B-2 District regulations. This section only reviews those regulations within the Zoning Code specific to the limited requests included in the PUD amendment. Section 1320 – District Provisions A. Special Requirements for B-2 General Business District – Section 1320.085 The Zoning Code includes certain special requirements for the B-2 District. Open sales areas are specifically listed as a prohibited use, but open air garden centers are exempt from this City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 5 of 16 restriction. Since the open air garden center use is not listed in the Land Use Chart as either permitted or conditional use, a Conditional Use Permit may be issued for this use following review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council, as stated in Section 1320.03 of the Zoning Code. A CUP was approved in Planning Case 97-009 for an outdoor garden sales area on the property. B. Lot Size, Structure Coverage, and Landscaping The proposed Lots 1 – 5 are in conformance with the B-2 Zoning District requirements in terms of minimum lot area, depth, and width. Since the site operates under an approved PUD that encompasses all five of the proposed lots, the proposal was evaluated based on whether the development as a whole conforms to the B-2 District requirements for structure coverage and landscape coverage. The maximum permitted structure coverage in the district is 45 percent. A total of 93,118 square feet of building area is proposed across the five lots, for coverage of 19.4 percent. Properties must maintain minimum landscape coverage of 20 percent. The development as a whole would include 114,046 square feet of landscaped area, or 23.76 percent of the total area. Total Area (square feet) Structure Coverage (square feet) Structure Coverage (percentage) Landscape Coverage (square feet) Landscape Coverage (percentage) Lot 1 (Walgreens) 76,533 14,572 19.04% 16,515 21.58% Lot 2 (Future Building #2) 27,853 6,000 21.54% 7,221 25.93% Lot 3 (Building #5 – Retail Center) 274,702 35,801 13.03% 76,670 27.91% Lot 4 (Building #5 – Frattallone’s) 63,171 16,609 26.29% 6,551 10.37% Lot 5 (Future Building #4) 37,732 20,136 53.37% 7,089 18.79% Total (PC #15-002) 479,991 93,118 19.40% 114,046 23.76% Approved PUD Amendment (PC #11-016) 479,991 92,748 19.32% 112,781 23.50% B-2 Zoning District Requirements 13,000 45% or less 20% or more C. Setbacks The minimum setbacks in the B-2 District are 20 feet in the front and rear and 10 feet in the side yards. The internal lot lines proposed in the Preliminary Plat are based on the locations of the buildings and setbacks to these are less of a concern in planned unit developments. The primary concern is setbacks to the public rights-of-way of County Road E and Lexington, as well as the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 6 of 16 private properties located to the south and west of the development. The proposed PUD amendment would not impact any building setbacks along the public right-of-way or adjacent private properties. A zero-foot setback is proposed along the side lot line of Lot 3 and Lot 4 since the subdivision would create a property line running through the existing retail building. Section 1325.03, Subdivision 1 of the Zoning Code allows for exceptions from side setback requirements provided that a proper demising or fire wall is used and if the adjacent buildings are constructed as an integral unit. The Zoning Code states that a shopping center, such as Arden Plaza, is an example of where this provision would apply. As mentioned in the introduction, the City Building Official and the Lake Johanna Fire Department have been working with the property owner on the specifications of the demising wall and building permits will be required prior to construction. Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Landscaping - Section 1325.05, Subdivision 1 A Landscaping Plan for the whole development was approved in Planning Case 09-011. For each successive phase of the Master PUD, the property owner will be required to install the landscaping improvements shown on the Landscaping Plan. The plan includes the installation of parking lot islands within the main parking area on Lot 3. This work was originally intended to be completed as part of Phase I. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that the property owner be required to complete these parking lot landscaping improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Building #2 or Building #5. The proposed amendment would not modify the existing Landscape Plan other than a reduction in the parking lot planting islands due to the construction of the outdoor sales area. The Zoning Code requires that at least ten percent of the parking area be occupied by planting islands that are at least 150 square feet in size and have at least one tree. The approved Landscape Plan shows a total of 10.5 percent of parking areas being occupied by planting islands. Three planting islands would be removed on the south side of the site to accommodate the outdoor sales area resulting in a reduction in the planting island area to 9.5 percent. B. Lighting – Section 1325.05, Subdivision 3 The Zoning Code requires that lighting be arranged to direct light away from adjacent lots and public streets. The source of illuminate must be hooded, concealed, or controlled so that only the intended site is illuminated. Two new parking lot lights would be located at the south perimeter of the parking area to assist with lighting the service area and the outdoor garden center. The applicant has provided examples of the proposed lights, which would conform to the Zoning Code requirements (Attachment A). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 7 of 16 C. Fence Regulations - Section 1325.05, Subdivision 4 The Zoning Code restricts the height of fences to no more than six feet. For proposed fences on non-residential properties greater than six feet in height, deviation from this requirement may be permitted after a Site Plan review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. The fencing along the perimeter of the outdoor sales area would measure six feet along the north and east side and eight feet along the south side. The need for additional height for the fence on the south side of the outdoor sales area is not clear based on the application and staff is recommending that this segment of the fence be no more than six feet in height. D. Parking – Section 1325.06, Subdivision 1 It is difficult to determine the exact number of required parking spaces for the development based on the Zoning Code regulations. The Master PUD assumes that a retail tenant would occupy the 20,136 square foot Building #4 on Lot 5 and that a restaurant use would be located in the 6,000 square foot Building #2 on Lot 2. For retail uses, one parking stall is required for every 150 square feet of gross retail sales floor area and for restaurant uses one stall is required for every two seats. However, the tenants for these buildings have yet to be determined. Different tenants may require different floor layouts that would impact the amount of gross retail floor area or the number of seats, thus impacting the number of required stalls. For the purpose of this evaluation, staff relied on the same calculation used in Planning Case 09- 011, which assumed that all space in the development would have the same percentage of gross retail sales space as the Walgreens at 80 percent. Based on these assumptions the number of parking stalls required for all the buildings would be 497 spaces. This calculation does not take into account the shared parking agreements that will allow users to park anywhere on the site and walk to their desired location. Off Street Parking Requirements Structure Coverage (square feet) Required Retail Parking (1 stall/150 sq. ft. gross sales floor area) Lot 1 (Walgreens) 14,572 78 Lot 2 (Future Building #2) 6,000 32 Lot 3 (Building #5 – Retail Center) 35,801 191 Lot 4 (Building #5 – Frattallone’s) 16,609 89 Lot 5 (Future Building #4) 20,136 107 Total Required Parking 497 Proposed Parking Stalls (PC 15-002) 440 Approved PUD (PC #09-011) 455 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 8 of 16 The PUD Amendment would reduce the overall number of parking stalls for the development from 455 to 440. This amount of parking equates to a ratio of 4.53 stalls per 1,000 square feet of retail space on site. According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), a retail center of this size is recommended to have at least 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet in order to accommodate peak parking demand. Based on the shared parking on the site provided through the Reciprocal Easement Agreement, the design layout of the parking lot, and ITE recommendations, staff has concluded that 440 stalls should be adequate to accommodate the development. Parking demands on the site would be evaluated in greater detail once the property owner moves forward with Phase II and Phase III. C. Traffic and Circulation – Section 1325.06, Subdivision 3 The Zoning Code requires that all commercial buildings be accessible to and from nearby public streets. The proposed Lot 4 is an interior parcel with no frontage on a publicly dedicated street. However, this lot would be entitled to access and parking under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement for the development as a whole that was recorded with the County. No amendments or additions are required for access or parking for the five lots within the development. The site will have similar circulation patterns following the addition of the outdoor sales area. The applicant has provided a revised Site Circulation Plan that takes into account the proposed amendments to the master plan (Attachment C). 3. B-2 District Design Standards – Section 1325.05 Subd. 8 The standards in this section only apply to building or site elements being developed or altered. Staff evaluated the Site Plan for the proposed outdoor sales area based on these design standards. The standards require that fences blend into the landscape, be compatible with other materials used on the site, and be made of material that minimizes corrosion. Finished and treated wood, brick, stone, or wrought iron materials are encouraged. The six-foot tall portion of the sales area fencing would be wrought iron and the eight-foot tall segment would be a vinyl-coated chain link material. Photo examples of the wrought iron fence are included in Attachment A. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that wrought iron materials be used for the fencing used around the entire perimeter of the sales area, including the south side. Section 1345 – Conditional Uses A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was approved in Planning Case 97-009 to allow for an outdoor garden sales area. The outdoor sales area approved in Planning Case 97-009 measured approximately 50 feet by 70 feet, or 3,500 square feet in total area. The proposed expanded outdoor sales area would measure 150 feet by 56 feet for a total area of 8,400 square feet. Section 1345.03 of the Zoning Code states that any enlargement or intensification of a conditional use not specifically permitted by the permit shall require an amended permit and all City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 9 of 16 procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being requested. Section 1355.04 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics 3. Drainage 4. Population density 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land 6. Adjoining land values 7. Park dedications where applicable 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. The City Council may place conditions on a permit if deemed necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Conditional Use Permits are granted for a specific use at a specific site and are not transferable. Additional Review City Engineer The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted plans and his comments are included in the attached memo dated January 13, 2015 (Attachment E). Those comments related to necessary revisions to the plan set have been added by the applicant. Other comments related to specific site operation requirements are being recommended as conditions of approval. Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the submitted plans and his comments are included in the attached memo dated January 29, 2015 (Attachment E). The Building Official has been working with the Lake Johanna Fire Department and the property owner to come up with construction plans for the demising wall between Lot 3 and Lot 4 that satisfy the State Building Code. In order to comply with the Building Code requirements, the wall separating the Frattallone’s Hardware store from the rest of the Arden Plaza retail building will need to be a fully compliant two hour fire barrier with no openings. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that the issue regarding the design and location of the demising wall between the two lots be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building Official prior to City Council review of Planning Case 15-002. Ramsey County Public Works Department The Ramsey County Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted plans and did not City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 10 of 16 have any comments at this time. Lake Johanna Fire Department The Fire Marshal has reviewed the submitted plans and his comments are included in the attached memo date January 12, 2015 (Attachment E). Rice Creek Watershed District The Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the submitted pans and determined that a RCWD permit will not be required for the proposed subdivision, parking lot modifications, and the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. Future phases outlined in the site development plans may require a permit at a later date. Findings of Fact This planning case includes four separate requests: the Preliminary Plat, the Final Plat, an amendment to the existing PUD for the property, and an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the outdoor seasonal sales area on the property. Staff offers the following findings of fact for consideration: Subdivision Findings 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat for the property at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North. 2. The subdivision would create three new parcels (Lot 3, Lot 4, and Lot 5) within the existing Arden Plaza plat. 3. The proposed Lot 3 and Lot 5 are in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code. 4. The proposed Lot 4 is not in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code because it is an interior parcel with no frontage on a publicly dedicated street. 5. The proposed Lot 4 is entitled to access and parking under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement (Doc. No. 2156888) that has been recorded against the property with Ramsey County. 6. The applicant has requested for flexibility through the PUD Amendment process for the proposed nonconforming Lot 4. PUD Amendment Findings 7. The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the Master PUD for Arden Plaza property. 8. The original Master PUD for the development was approved in Planning Case #09-011. A subsequent PUD Amendment was approved in Planning Case #11-016. 9. The PUD Amendment is being requested in order to accommodate the proposed subdivision, to include an expanded outdoor seasonal sales area on the site, to increase City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 11 of 16 the size of Building #4 to be constructed in Phase III, and to allow for minor modifications to the existing parking lot. 10. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. 11. The Arden Plaza development is located in the B-2 General Business District. 12. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District that outlines future development principals for the area. 13. The City has adopted Design Standards for the B-2 District within the Zoning Code. 14. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City’s Zoning Code. 15. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. 16. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 17. The submitted Site Plan for the Frattallone’s Hardware outdoor seasonal sales area is in conformance with the B-2 District Design Standards. 18. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City’s Zoning Code, flexibility has been requested by the applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 19. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. CUP Amendment Findings 20. The City approved a Conditional Use Permit in Planning Case 97-009 for a 3,500 square foot outdoor garden sales area on the Arden Plaza site. 21. The proposed Frattallone’s Hardware outdoor sales area would measure 150 feet by 56 feet, or a total area of 8,400 square feet. 22. Section 1345.03 of the Zoning Code states that any enlargement or intensification of a conditional use not specifically permitted by the permit shall require an amended permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being requested. 23. Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. 24. The proposal will have limited impacts on existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. 25. The proposal will not affect noise on the property. 26. The proposal will not affect glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid and solid waste on the property. 27. The proposal will have limited impacts on drainage on the property. 28. The proposal will not affect the population density on the property. 29. The proposal is unlikely to significantly affect land values on the subject property or on neighboring properties. 30. The park dedication requirement does not apply in this case. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 12 of 16 Recommendation Staff is generally supportive of the separate requests within Planning Case 15-002. The proposed subdivision should help with the marketing of the proposed Lot 5 for future development. While Lot 4 would not have frontage on a public street, the existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement for the development will guarantee access to Lot 4 in perpetuity. The amendment to the Master PUD to include an expanded and more permanent outdoor seasonal sales area for Frattallone’s Hardware will better define and formalize this activity within the development. Staff does have concerns about certain site improvements that were scheduled to be finished during Phase I that have yet to be completed. Additionally, staff would recommend that the execution of the Final Plat be conditioned on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building following the completion of the required demising wall between Lot 3 and Lot 4. These concerns are reflected in the recommended conditions of approval. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002, staff is recommending the following twenty-two (22) conditions of approval: 1. Prior to City Council review of Planning Case 15-002, the issue regarding the design and location of the demising wall between Lot 3 and Lot 4 shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Fire Marshall. 2. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of all previous Master PUD Agreements, permits, and reviews, except as hereinafter amended. 3. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. 4. A Development Agreement Amendment shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The agreement shall be executed by all parties within the Arden Plaza development prior to the issuance of any building or development permits. 5. The final construction plans for the demising wall between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building shall meet the standards as outlined by the City Building Official in the memo dated January 29, 2015. 6. The execution of the Final Plat shall be conditioned on the demising wall construction between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building receiving final approval from the City Building Official. 7. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of the supplemental declaration between Frattallone’s Hardware and Arden Plaza, LLC addressing the issues of drainage and driveway maintenance shall be provided to the City. 8. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the Sewer and Water services provided to Lot 4 thought the building on Lot 3 shall be provided to the City. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 13 of 16 9. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the operation, maintenance, and ownership of all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer within the development, and the process by which future land use applications will be submitted to the City for properties within the development, shall be provided to the City. 10. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the date of the City’s approval of the Final Plat. An extension request must be submitted in writing to the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date. 11. The Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event of a developer default. 12. The Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 13. Final grading and erosion plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. 14. The operations of the Bio-Filtration Area #2 identified on the Master Site Plan shall be corrected to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. 15. The City currently holds a Letter of Credit (American Bank Letter of Credit No. 2527) for the patching and seal coating of the parking lot next to the Frattallone’s Hardware store. This work shall be completed by September 30, 2015 or the LOC maturity date shall be extended. 16. The applicant shall construct the main parking area and landscaping improvements previously planned for Phase I prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Building #2 or Building #5. 17. The fence around the perimeter of the outdoor seasonal sales area shall be made of wrought iron materials and shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. 18. No exterior signage shall be attached to the fence around the outdoor seasonal sales area. 19. The outdoor seasonal sales area must be an extension of and consistent with the applicant’s permitted principal use. 20. The outdoor seasonal sales area shall be used exclusively for the seasonal sale of nursery and garden items, including but not limited to flowers, plants, landscaping materials, and Christmas trees. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 14 of 16 21. The site shall be kept in a neat and orderly fashion, free from litter, refuse, debris, junk, or other waste which results in offensive odors or unsightly conditions. 22. No storage, displays, or sales shall be permitted outside of the outdoor seasonal sales area. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the twenty-two (22) conditions in the February 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the February 4, 2015, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North based on the following findings of fact… 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527- 3557 Lexington Avenue North for the following reasons… Notice Notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the subject property. Resident Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 5, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by March 6, 2015 (60 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 15 of 16 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application and Supporting Materials B. Site and Aerial Maps C. Plan Set (Preliminary and Final Plat, Master Site Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, and Parking and Circulation Plan) D. Approved Master Site Plan (PC 09-011) and Preliminary Plat (PC 11-016) E. Additional Review Comments (City Building Official, City Engineer, Lake Johanna Fire Department) City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-002 - Arden Plaza - Master PUD Amendment and Subdivision\Memos_15-002 Page 16 of 16 Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL C. Planning Case 15-002; Preliminary and Final Plat, PUD Amendment and CUP Amendment – 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North – Arden Plaza – Public Hearing Associate Planner Bachler stated that the City Council approved a redevelopment proposal for the Arden Plaza retail center in 2009 in Planning Case 09-011. The approved Master PUD included the demolition of an existing office complex, the subdivision of the parcel into four lots, and the construction of four new buildings over three phases. A total of 97,035 square feet of retail and commercial building space was approved for the Master PUD. Phase I of the PUD, which included the development of a pharmacy in place of the office building, was also approved as part of this planning case. Associate Planner Bachler indicated that a subsequent PUD Amendment in 2011 (Planning Case 11-016) included a revised plat that combined two of the lots in the northeast corner of the site into a single lot for the development of the existing Walgreens Pharmacy. Phase I of the Master PUD was largely completed in 2012, and included the construction of the Walgreens building, modifications to parking and circulation within the retail center area, and the construction of stormwater bio-filtration basins required for the proposed build-out of the site. Associate Planner Bachler explained that prior to the City’s approval of the Master PUD for the retail center, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request from Frattallone’s Hardware was approved in Planning Case 97-009 for fencing a part of the parking lot on the property to allow for a seasonal garden sales area. A CUP was required because the Zoning Code does not specifically allow or prohibit outdoor garden sales as a use. The seasonal outdoor sales area continues to operate on the property, although the area was never fenced off as proposed and its footprint has expanded beyond what was originally approved by the City in the CUP. Associate Planner Bachler noted the Master PUD and subsequent amendment, along with the associated plans and the conditions of approval, remain valid. Neither Phase II nor Phase III of the approved Master PUD is being reviewed as part of this amendment request. The buildings included in these future phases would return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to development. Associate Planner Bachler commented that the first component of the application is the Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide Lot 3 within the existing Arden Plaza plat into three separate parcels. Frattallone’s Hardware, which is a current tenant in the retail center, has approached Wellington Management regarding the purchase of its store and the existing outdoor ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 2 garden center. To accommodate this, a new Lot 4 would be created comprised of the Frattallone’s portion of the building, the area occupied by the outdoor seasonal sales area, and related parking and service areas. Associate Planner Bachler reported that the new Lot 3 would be comprised of the remaining retail center, the primary parking area, access drives on County Road E and Lexington Avenue, and the stormwater pond at the southeast corner of the site. The common lot line between the remaining portion of the retail building on Lot 3 and the Frattallone’s Hardware store on Lot 4 would be defined by a demising wall. The definition of a demising wall is a wall used jointly by two parties erected upon a line dividing two parcels of land, each of which is a separate real estate entity. The City Building Official and the Lake Johanna Fire Department have been working with the property owner on the specifications of the demising wall and final building permits will be required prior to construction. Approval of the Final Plat will be conditioned on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed remodeling work. Associate Planner Bachler stated that the new Lot 5 would include the future Building #4, which is proposed to be constructed in Phase III of the approved Master PUD, along with a small parking area. Lot 5 is located along Lexington Avenue. The proposed footprint of Building #4 has increased from the Master PUD approved in 2009. The submitted master site plan indicates that this building would be 20,136 square feet in size, an increase of 2,136 square feet from the 2009 PUD approval. Associate Planner Bachler indicated that Wellington Management is requesting an amendment to the Master PUD to address the following items: • Account for the subdivision of Lot 3 within Arden Plaza into three separate lots. • Allow for the creation of a non-conforming parcel (Lot 4) that does not have frontage on a publicly dedicated street. • Include the proposed permanent outdoor seasonal sales area on Lot 4 within the Master Site Plan. • Increase the size of Building #4 on the proposed Lot 5 from 18,000 square feet, as approved in Planning Case 09-011, to 20,136 square feet. • Minor modification to the parking lot at the north end of the retail center to retain 12 existing parking stalls that are shown being removed on the Master Site Plan. Associate Planner Bachler reported that the submitted plans include a detailed Site Plan for the Frattallone’s seasonal sales area. The proposed outdoor garden center would measure 150 feet by 56 feet for a total area of 8,400 square feet. The existing bituminous surface on which the outdoor sales area is now located would be replaced with a four inch high concrete display curb. Fencing along the perimeter of the area would help define and separate the space from the adjacent parking and service areas. A six-foot tall ornamental fence is proposed along the north and east sides of the sales area and an eight-foot tall chain link fence on the south side. Associate Planner Bachler explained the CUP for the outdoor garden center use approved in 1997 remains valid. However, the applicant is seeking approval to expand the overall area of this use on the site. The Zoning Code requires that any enlargement or intensification of a conditional use shall require an amended permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being requested. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 3 Associate Planner Bachler noted that the Planned Unit Development process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for development that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may make exceptions to setbacks, lot coverage, parking requirements, signage, building materials, or landscaping requirements. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and improve the overall design of a project. While the PUD process allows the City to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any conditions imposed on the PUD must have a rational basis related to the expected impact of the development. A PUD cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district. Associate Planner Bachler commented that when a PUD is comprised of multiple lots, it is often treated as one continuous development. The development as a whole would be expected to meet the landscaping, stormwater, and other similar requirements. For example, one property in the PUD may have 60 percent building coverage, but the development as a whole may not exceed 50 percent building coverage to maintain conformance with the underlying zoning district. In order to maintain shared amenities such as parking spaces, access drives, and stormwater ponds the development is required to create a legal entity to manage and maintain the shared facilities. Site Data Land Use Plan: Commercial Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Retail/Commercial Zoning: B-2: General Business District Current Lot Sizes: 12.55 Acres (546,717) Topography: The elevation of the lot is lower than Lexington Avenue. There is a stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the property. Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation, the Zoning Code Review and B-2 District Design Standards. Associate Planner Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: Subdivision Findings 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat for the property at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North. 2. The subdivision would create three new parcels (Lot 3, Lot 4, and Lot 5) within the existing Arden Plaza plat. 3. The proposed Lot 3 and Lot 5 are in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code. 4. The proposed Lot 4 is not in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance in Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code because it is an interior parcel with no frontage on a publicly dedicated street. 5. The proposed Lot 4 is entitled to access and parking under an existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement (Doc. No. 2156888) that has been recorded against the property with Ramsey County. 6. The applicant has requested for flexibility through the PUD Amendment process for the proposed nonconforming Lot 4. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 4 PUD Amendment Findings 7. The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the Master PUD for the Arden Plaza property. 8. The original Master PUD for the development was approved in Planning Case #09-011. A subsequent PUD Amendment was approved in Planning Case #11-016. 9. The PUD Amendment is being requested in order to accommodate the proposed subdivision, to include an expanded outdoor seasonal sales area on the site, to increase the size of Building #4 to be constructed in Phase III, and to allow for minor modifications to the existing parking lot. 10. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. 11. The Arden Plaza development is located in the B-2 General Business District. 12. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District that outlines future development principals for the area. 13. The City has adopted Design Standards for the B-2 District within the Zoning Code. 14. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City’s Zoning Code. 15. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. 16. The Master PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 17. The submitted Site Plan for the Frattallone’s Hardware outdoor seasonal sales area is in conformance with the B-2 District Design Standards. 18. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City’s Zoning Code, flexibility has been requested by the applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 19. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. CUP Amendment Findings 20. The City approved a Conditional Use Permit in Planning Case 97-009 for a 3,500 square foot outdoor garden sales area on the Arden Plaza site. 21. The proposed Frattallone’s Hardware outdoor sales area would measure 150 feet by 56 feet, or a total area of 8,400 square feet. 22. Section 1345.03 of the Zoning Code states that any enlargement or intensification of a conditional use not specifically permitted by the permit shall require an amended permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being requested. 23. Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. 24. The proposal will have limited impacts on existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. 25. The proposal will not affect noise on the property. 26. The proposal will not affect glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid and solid waste on the property. 27. The proposal will have limited impacts on drainage on the property. 28. The proposal will not affect the population density on the property. 29. The proposal is unlikely to significantly affect land values on the subject property or on neighboring properties. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 5 30. The park dedication requirement does not apply in this case. Associate Planner Bachler stated that staff is generally supportive of the separate requests within Planning Case 15-002. The proposed subdivision should help with the marketing of the proposed Lot 5 for future development. While Lot 4 would not have frontage on a public street, the existing Reciprocal Easement Agreement for the development will guarantee access to Lot 4 in perpetuity. The amendment to the Master PUD to include an expanded and more permanent outdoor seasonal sales area for Frattallone’s Hardware will better define and formalize this activity within the development. Associate Planner Bachler indicated that staff does have concerns about certain site improvements that were scheduled to be finished during Phase I that have yet to be completed. Additionally, staff would recommend that the execution of the Final Plat be conditioned on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building following the completion of the required demising wall between Lot 3 and Lot 4. These concerns are reflected in the recommended conditions of approval. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002, staff is recommending the following twenty-two (22) conditions of approval: 1. Prior to City Council review of Planning Case 15-002, the issue regarding the design and location of the demising wall between Lot 3 and Lot 4 shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Fire Marshall. 2. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of all previous Master PUD Agreements, permits, and reviews, except as hereinafter amended. 3. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. 4. A Development Agreement Amendment shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The agreement shall be executed by all parties within the Arden Plaza development prior to the issuance of any building or development permits. 5. The final construction plans for the demising wall between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building shall meet the standards as outlined by the City Building Official in the memo dated January 29, 2015. 6. The execution of the Final Plat shall be conditioned on the demising wall construction between the Frattallone’s Hardware store and the remainder of the Arden Plaza retail building receiving final approval from the City Building Official. 7. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of the supplemental declaration between Frattallone’s Hardware and Arden Plaza, LLC addressing the issues of drainage and driveway maintenance shall be provided to the City. 8. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the Sewer and Water services provided to Lot 4 thought the building on Lot 3 shall be provided to the City. 9. Prior to the execution of the Final Plat, a copy of an agreement addressing the operation, maintenance, and ownership of all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer within the development, and the process by which future land use applications will be submitted to the City for properties within the development, shall be provided to the City. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 6 10. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the date of the City’s approval of the Final Plat. An extension request must be submitted in writing to the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date. 11. The Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. The financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC- insured Minnesota bank, and be in a form acceptable to the City. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that site improvements are completed in the event of a developer default. 12. The Developer shall submit a cash escrow in the amount of 25 percent of the estimated costs of site improvements including grading, utilities, and paving, prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. The escrow will be used for City costs related to review, approval, and inspection of site improvements or any costs incurred by the City in the event of a developer default. 13. Final grading and erosion plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. 14. The operations of the Bio-Filtration Area #2 identified on the Master Site Plan shall be corrected to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any development permits related to the construction of the outdoor seasonal sales area. 15. The City currently holds a Letter of Credit (American Bank Letter of Credit No. 2527) for the patching and seal coating of the parking lot next to the Frattallone’s Hardware store. This work shall be completed by September 30, 2015 or the LOC maturity date shall be extended. 16. The applicant shall construct the main parking area and landscaping improvements previously planned for Phase I prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Building #2 or Building #4. 17. The fence around the perimeter of the outdoor seasonal sales area shall be made of wrought iron materials and shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. 18. No exterior signage shall be attached to the fence around the outdoor seasonal sales area. 19. The outdoor seasonal sales area must be an extension of and consistent with the applicant’s permitted principal use. 20. The outdoor seasonal sales area shall be used exclusively for the seasonal sale of nursery and garden items, including but not limited to flowers, plants, landscaping materials, and Christmas trees. 21. The site shall be kept in a neat and orderly fashion, free from litter, refuse, debris, junk, or other waste, which results in offensive odors or unsightly conditions. 22. No storage, displays, or sales shall be permitted outside of the outdoor seasonal sales area. Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 7 Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Bartel requested further information on the zero lot line setback. Associate Planner Bachler explained that lots are required to maintain certain rear, front, and side yard setbacks. He reviewed Section 1325 of the Zoning Code, noting the exception to the required side yard setback provided that a demising wall is used and if the adjacent buildings are constructed as an integral unit, as was the case with the Arden Plaza shopping center. Further discussion ensued regarding the property line, outdoor storage and future additions to the property. Commissioner Holewa questioned if the proposed eight-foot height of the fencing was at the applicant’s request. Associate Planner Bachler stated that the applicant had requested an eight-foot chain link fence to be placed along the south side of the seasonal sales area. He reported that staff had concerns with the additional height and that it would be a chain link fence. Commissioner Bartel discussed the parking concerns on the Arden Plaza property and inquired if the proposed number of parking spaces was sufficient. Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the site plan with the Commission and commented that staff believed the proposed number of parking stalls was adequate. He reported that the exact parking needs for the future phases was uncertain at this time. Commissioner Zimmerman provided comment on how the parking and traffic from the future uses would impact this site. He questioned if the current traffic patterns would support the proposed use. Associate Planner Bachler noted that a traffic study was completed with the original PUD request. He commented that a similar amount of building space was being proposed for the site with the current PUD Amendment request. David Bergstrom, Wellington Management, provided comment on the zero lot line with regard to the shopping center. He noted that several parking spaces were lost on the site due to the Walgreens development. Commissioner Jones asked if any additional landscaping would be installed surrounding the seasonal sales area. Mr. Bergstrom explained that the seasonal sales area was a non-permeable surface at this time. He reported that the main focus of the PUD Amendment request was the proposed lot split. Tom Frattallone, Frattallone Hardware, discussed the design of the garden center with the Commission. He commented that a raised concrete area would surround this garden center in order to provide a platform for the fencing. He requested that Condition #22 be removed from ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 8 the staff’s recommendation for approval. It was his opinion that this condition was holding his property to a higher standard than surrounding uses. Commissioner Holewa believed this was a reasonable request. Associate Planner Bachler supported amending the language within Condition #22 to allow for the continued use of the area under the canopy for outdoor display of merchandise. He did not want to see outdoor sales continued into the parking lot or service areas outside of the defined fenced-off garden center. Staff then discussed the requirements for outdoor storage in the B-2 Zoning District. Chair Thompson supported the outdoor storage for Frattallone’s remain in place as is. Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 9:08 p.m. Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 9:09 p.m. Commissioner Holewa asked if Wellington Management had any prospects for Lot 2. Mr. Bergstrom stated he was in negotiations with a business at this time. Commissioner Jones understood that the building was well screened and for this reason, he supported the outdoor storage. City Planner Streff reported that within the City Code, outdoor storage was only allowed as a conditional use in the I-2 district. Community Development Director Hutmacher stated if the Commission was in favor of allowing outdoor storage, this would be something staff could work with, so long as it did not leak out into the parking area. Chair Thompson was in favor of allowing outdoor storage on the south side of the building, so long as it did not extend into the parking lot. Commissioner Bartel believed that Frattallone’s was not interested in having outdoor storage along the front of their building, but rather the south side of the building. He discussed how the applicant was expanding their outdoor sales area on the site. Mr. Frattallone explained that he was not requesting any additional storage space than what has been used by his business for the past 17 years. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if bulk product would still be stored on the south side of the building. Mr. Frattallone stated bulk items would still be stored in this location. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 9 Commissioner Holewa was in favor of striking Condition #22. Chair Thompson agreed, but suggested that the Council make the final determination on this matter. Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the twenty-one (21) conditions (striking condition #22) in the February 4, 2015, report to the Planning Commission, Commissioner Bartel asked how the property was altered by the Walgreens development. Associate Planner Bachler discussed how the site was impacted by Walgreens. He noted that several parking spaces would be lost due to the expansion of the seasonal sales area, while several spaces on the north side of the retail center building would be retained through the PUD amendment. Commissioner Zimmerman stated that he could not support the removal of Condition #22 when this went against the City’s Zoning Code. Councilmember Woodburn discussed the differences between outdoor storage and outdoor sales. Commissioner Holewa suggested that his motion be amended to reinstate Condition #22, with the word “no” deleted. Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Jones seconded an amendment to reinstate Condition #22, with the word “no” deleted. Commissioner Zimmerman stated that the role of the Planning Commission was to uphold the City’s Zoning Code. Commissioner Holewa noted that the request before the Commission was a PUD, which allowed for some level of flexibility. Commissioner Jones stated that the applicant was only requesting to grandfather in a space for storage that was already being used for storing bulk items. Commissioner Bartel did not support the amendment. He suggested that the case be tabled to allow for the storage and parking issues to be further addressed by staff with the applicant. Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that this would allow for additional time for the staff to discuss the storage and parking concerns. She then discussed how tabling the matter would impact the applicant. She recommended Commissioner Holewa withdraw his original motion and friendly amendment, and that a new motion be made. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2015 10 Commissioner Holewa withdrew his motion and friendly amendment. Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 15-002 for a Preliminary and Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 3527-3557 Lexington Avenue North based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the twenty-two (22) conditions (noting only Lot 4 shall be allowed to have outdoor storage and sales) in the February 4, 2015, report to the Planning Commission, The motion carried 4-2 (Bartel and Zimmerman opposed). Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 30, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator FROM: John Anderson, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: 2015 PMP Bids/Assessment Roll Requested Action 1. Adopt Resolution 2015-015 Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll for the 2015 PMP - Venus Crystal Neighborhood 2. Adopt Resolution 2015-016 Setting the Date for the Assessment Hearing for the 2015 PMP - Venus/Crystal Neighborhood on Monday, April 27, 2015 3. Adopt Resolution 2015-017 Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll for the 2015 PMP - Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood 4. Adopt Resolution 2015-018 Setting the Date for the Assessment Hearing for the 2015 PMP - Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood on Monday, May 4, 2015 Background/Discussion As per Council direction, bids were opened on Thursday, March 19, 2015 for both 2015 Pavement Management Program (PMP) projects: Venus/Crystal Neighborhood and Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood. There were a total of 8 bids received. The following list provides the bidder’s name and their total bid. A full bid tabulation is attached as Attachment A. Valley Paving, Inc. $3,911,980.18 Astech Corporation $4,236,436.72 Palda & Sons, Inc. $4,309,867.43 Park Construction Co. $4,339,078.97 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $4,536,575.67 T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $4,758,548.31 Redstone Construction $4,972,862.29 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $5,323,532.06 The low bid of $3,911,980.18 received from Valley Paving Inc. compares favorably with construction cost estimates from both of the Feasibility Reports which is a total of $4,181,300. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – 9B MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Further analysis of the low bid; adding overhead according to the City’s Assessment Policy and dividing it into the cost for the two specific neighborhoods results in the following total project costs: $3,719,403.67 Total Project Cost for the Venus/Crystal Neighborhood $1,493,126.36 Total Project Cost for the Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood Each of these total project costs were then analyzed for the assessable cost which as described in the City’s Assessment Policy is half of the street project cost. The results of this analysis is as follows: Venus/Crystal Neighborhood Assessment Rate of $8,614.27 per unit as compared to the Feasibility Report estimate of $11,450. Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood Assessment Rate of $5,563.07 per unit as compared to the Feasibility Report estimate of $6,600. In order to move both of these projects forward, it would be appropriate for the Council to consider adopting the attached four resolutions. The first, Resolution 2015-015 (Attachment B) Declares the Cost to be Assessed and Orders the Preparation of the Assessment Rol l. The second, Resolution 2015-016 (Attachment C) Sets the Date for the Assessment Hearing as April 27, 2015 for the Venus/Crystal Neighborhood. The next two Resolutions (attachment D & E) do the same for the Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood with the Hearing date of May 4, 2015. Staff recommends adoption of all four Resolutions. It should be noted that in discussions with City Attorney Joel Jamnik it was his suggestion to hold the two Assessment Hearings on separate nights due to the difference in proposed assessment rates. In order to get the project to construction as early as possible staff is suggesting a special Council meeting on May 4th after the regularly scheduled JDA meeting for the Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Assessment hearing. The attached Resolutions reflect this special meeting date. Attachments Attachment A: Bid Tabulation Attachment B: Resolution 2015-015 Attachment C: Resolution 2015-016 Attachment D: Resolution 2015-017 Attachment E: Resolution 2015-018 BI D T A B U L A T I O N PR O J E C T : 20 1 5 P M P I M P R O V E M E N T S OW N E R : CI T Y O F A R D E N H I L L S OP E N I N G D A T E : Ma r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 EN G I N E E R : EL F E R I N G & A S S O C I A T E S IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) 1 20 2 1 . 5 0 1 M O B I L I Z A T I O N L S 1 . 0 0 5 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 0 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 2 9 0 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 2 21 0 1 . 5 0 2 C L E A R I N G T R E E 8 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 2 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 6 . 0 0 2 , 5 2 8 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 21 0 1 . 5 0 7 G R U B B I N G T R E E 8 . 0 0 1 1 3 . 0 0 9 0 4 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 9 . 0 0 1 , 1 1 2 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T S Y 6 2 5 . 00 8 . 5 0 5 , 3 1 2 . 5 0 4 . 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 . 0 4 5 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 7 . 1 5 4 , 4 6 8 . 7 5 6 . 5 0 4 , 0 6 2 . 5 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 14 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 8 4 0 , 7 8 0 . 8 0 3 . 0 0 4 2 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 2 3 9 , 9 3 1 . 2 0 1 . 2 5 1 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 2 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 6 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E S I G N E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 6 0 6 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 8 7 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 7 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X E A C H 7 9 . 0 0 6 1 . 5 0 4 , 8 5 8 . 5 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 7 9 6 0 . 0 0 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 5 1 1 S A W C U T C O N C R E T E ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 2 4 , 0 6 0 . 8 0 3 . 0 0 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 2 . 6 3 3 , 7 8 7 . 2 0 2 . 6 5 3 , 8 1 6 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 5 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 9 21 0 4 . 5 1 3 S A W C U T B I T U M I N O U S ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 9 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 7 5 1 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 1 . 8 1 1 , 6 2 9 . 0 0 3 . 7 5 3 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 10 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 C O M M O N E X C A V A T I O N ( P ) C Y 7 , 8 1 5 . 8 2 1 4 . 5 0 1 1 3 , 3 2 9 . 3 9 10 . 5 0 8 2 , 0 6 6 . 1 1 1 8 . 2 1 1 4 2 , 3 2 6 . 0 8 1 5 . 5 0 1 2 1 , 1 4 5 . 2 1 1 8 . 2 1 1 4 2 , 3 2 6 . 0 8 11 21 0 5 . 5 0 7 S U B G R A D E E X C A V A T I O N C Y 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 4 . 5 0 8 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 12 . 0 0 6 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 1 4 . 1 7 8 , 2 1 8 . 6 0 1 4 . 6 0 8 , 4 6 8 . 0 0 1 8 . 2 1 1 0 , 5 6 1 . 8 0 12 21 0 5 . 5 2 2 S E L E C T G R A N U L A R B O R R O W ( C V ) C Y 5 8 0 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 1 3 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 2 5 7 , 6 8 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 9 5 1 5 , 0 5 1 . 0 0 2 9 . 5 0 1 7 , 1 1 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 13 21 0 5 . 5 2 5 T O P S O I L B O R R O W C Y 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 14 21 0 5 . 6 0 4 G E O T E X T I L E F A B R I C T Y P E V S Y 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 8 5 1 , 48 7 . 5 0 2 . 5 0 4 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 . 2 3 2 , 1 5 2 . 5 0 1 . 4 0 2 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 1 0 1 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 15 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 T O N 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 6 2 . 5 0 16 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 9 9 8 1 , 1 8 7 . 5 0 1 1 . 9 0 7 4 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 6 8 1 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 16 22 1 1 5 0 1 AG G R E G A T E B A S E C L A S S 7 ( D R I V E W A Y ) TO N 65 0 0 0 17 4 0 11 3 1 0 0 0 18 0 0 11 7 0 0 0 0 13 7 4 8 931 00 16 10 10 465 00 18 25 11 862 50 16 22 1 1 .50 1 AG G R E G A T E BA S E , CL A S S 7 (D R I V E W A Y ) TO N 65 0 .00 17 .40 11 ,31 0 .00 18 .00 11 ,70 0 .00 13 .74 8 ,931 .00 16 .10 10 ,465 .00 18 .25 11 ,862 .50 17 22 3 2 . 5 0 1 M I L L B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 6 0 . 0 0 6 . 7 5 4 0 5 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 . 5 0 1 , 1 7 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 5 0 6 3 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 18 23 3 1 . 6 0 3 B I T U M I N O U S J O I N T C O N T R O L L F 2 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 3 3 6 , 3 6 0 . 9 0 3 . 5 0 9 , 5 5 5 . 0 0 2 . 5 8 7 , 0 4 3 . 4 0 2 . 6 5 7 , 2 3 4 . 5 0 3 . 1 9 8 , 7 0 8 . 7 0 19 23 5 7 . 5 0 2 B I T U M I N O U S M A T E R I A L F O R T A C K C O A T G A L 5 6 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 , 1 3 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 1 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 5 . 6 0 3 , 1 6 4 . 0 0 2 . 9 0 1 , 6 3 8 . 5 0 3 . 2 5 1 , 8 3 6 . 2 5 20 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 6 4 . 15 7 3 , 7 7 2 . 5 0 6 6 . 2 5 7 6 , 1 8 7 . 5 0 5 0 . 5 0 5 8 , 0 7 5 . 0 0 6 6 . 6 0 7 6 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 6 2 . 0 0 7 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 21 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 9 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( T R A I L ) T O N 1 5 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 5 . 0 0 2 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 1 5 2 . 0 0 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 2 5 . 0 0 22 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 3 0 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 8 . 0 0 5 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 2 , 8 5 0.00 23 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 N O N W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 2 . 70 9 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 7 5 9 8 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 4 9 . 5 0 7 4 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 6 0 9 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 . 6 5 8 9 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 24 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 I R R I G A T I O N R E P A I R E A C H 1 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 25 25 3 1 . 5 0 1 C O N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R B 6 1 8 L F 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 1 0 8 1 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 5 0 9 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 7 9 , 7 8 5 . 0 0 1 0 . 3 0 8 3 , 4 3 0 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 7 9 , 7 8 5 . 0 0 26 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 4 " C O N C R E T E W A L K S F 2 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 4 3 1 , 1 4 0 . 3 0 5 . 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 7 0 2 , 2 4 7 . 0 0 5 . 5 5 1 , 1 6 5 . 5 0 27 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 11 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 4 . 4 1 4 9 , 8 7 7 . 1 0 5 . 0 0 5 6 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 5 6 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 4 . 8 0 5 4 , 2 8 8 . 0 0 4 . 5 5 5 1 , 4 6 0 . 5 0 28 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( S P E C I A L ) ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 7 1 3, 8 1 3 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 1 0 3 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 4 0 5 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 6 5 3 , 7 9 5 . 0 0 29 25 3 1 . 6 1 8 T R U N C A T E D D O M E S S F 4 8 . 0 0 4 1 . 0 0 1 , 9 6 8 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 1 , 5 8 4 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 30 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , P L A S T I C ( R E P L A C E M E N T ) L F 4 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 6 . 5 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 31 25 6 3 . 6 0 1 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L L S 1 . 0 0 4 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 4 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 32 25 6 4 . 5 3 1 F & I S I G N P A N E L S F 1 5 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 8 0 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 33 25 6 4 . 6 0 2 F & I S I G N P O S T E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 9 7 . 4 0 1 , 5 5 8 . 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 1 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 1 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 34 25 7 3 . 5 0 2 S I L T F E N C E T Y P E M A C H I N E S L I C E D L F 4 6 5 . 0 0 3 . 2 0 1 , 48 8 . 0 0 3 . 2 5 1 , 5 1 1 . 2 5 3 . 0 0 1 , 3 9 5 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 1 , 1 6 2 . 5 0 2 . 2 5 1 , 0 4 6 . 2 5 35 25 7 3 . 5 2 0 S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L B A C K H O E H R 2 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 6 . 0 0 2 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . 36 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 T E M P O R A R Y R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E E A C H 3 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 37 25 7 3 . 6 0 7 R O A D W A Y R O C K C H E C K D A M C Y 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 6 . 8 0 8 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 38 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 1 4 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 7 , 7 0 0 . 00 2 5 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 9 . 2 3 9 , 6 9 2 . 2 0 6 9 . 2 0 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 39 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 S E E D I N G ( T Y P E 2 5 - 1 5 1 ) S Y 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 1 1 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 1 . 50 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 4 5 1 3 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 0 2 4 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 5 0 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 40 25 7 5 . 6 0 7 L A N D S C A P E R O C K C Y 3 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 90 0 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 41 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 42 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 1 5 5 . 0 0 4 6 5 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 00 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 43 SP E C G R A D A T I O N T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 44 SP E C A I R V O I D S E A C H 6 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 84 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 45 SP E C C O N C R E T E T E S T I N G , C Y L I N D E R S ( S E T O F 3 ) E A C H 6 . 0 0 21 5 . 0 0 1 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 8 4 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 46 SP E C E X T R A C T I O N / G R A D A T I O N E A C H 6 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 14 0 . 0 0 8 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 47 SP E C N U C L E A R B I T U M I N O U S D E N S I T Y E A C H 1 8 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 5 0 4 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 4 8 6 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 4 8 6 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 4 8 6 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) - - T O T A L 65 7 , 8 2 3 . 1 9 7 0 0 , 4 2 4 . 6 5 7 2 4 , 9 1 9 . 6 8 7 3 8 , 6 7 7 . 4 6 9 9 7 , 0 8 6 . 0 8 SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) 1 20 2 1 . 5 0 1 M O B I L I Z A T I O N L S 1 . 0 0 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 6 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 21 0 1 . 5 0 2 C L E A R I N G T R E E 1 5 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 3 , 8 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 3 1 6 . 0 0 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 21 0 1 . 5 0 7 G R U B B I N G T R E E 1 5 . 0 0 1 1 3 . 0 0 1 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 1 3 9 . 0 0 2 , 0 8 5 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E C U R B A N D G U T T E R L F 2 5 4 . 0 0 4 . 9 0 1 , 2 4 4 . 6 0 3 . 0 0 7 6 2 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 4 . 0 0 3 . 3 5 8 5 0 . 9 0 5 . 0 0 1 , 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T S Y 1 , 05 5 . 0 0 8 . 5 0 8 , 9 6 7 . 5 0 4 . 0 0 4 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 9 . 0 4 9 , 5 3 7 . 2 0 7 . 9 5 8 , 3 8 7 . 2 5 6 . 5 0 6 , 8 5 7 . 5 0 6 21 0 4 5 0 5 RE M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T SY 31 2 5 0 0 0 28 5 89 0 6 2 5 0 30 0 93 7 5 0 0 0 28 2 88 125 00 12 5 39 062 50 20 0 62 500 00 6 21 0 4 .50 5 RE M O V E BI T U M I N O U S PA V E M E N T SY 31 ,25 0 .00 2 .85 89 ,06 2 .50 3 .00 93 ,75 0 .00 2 .82 88 ,125 .00 1 .25 39 ,062 .50 2 .00 62 ,500 .00 7 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E S I G N E A C H 6 1 . 0 0 2 5 . 6 0 1 , 5 6 1 . 6 0 2 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X E A C H 1 0 4 . 0 0 6 1 . 5 0 6 , 3 9 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 . 0 4 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 9 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X ( S P E C I A L ) E A C H 1 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 10 21 0 4 . 6 1 8 S A L V A G E B R I C K P A V E R S S F 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 5 5 3 , 9 0 1 . 5 0 1 . 00 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 4 , 2 0 7 . 5 0 6 . 0 0 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 11 21 0 4 . 6 1 8 S A L V A G E R E T A I N I N G W A L L S F 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 5 5 8 4 4 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 9 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 12 21 0 4 . 5 1 1 S A W C U T C O N C R E T E ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 2 . 8 0 3 , 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 4 , 2 1 5 . 0 0 2 . 6 3 3 , 6 9 5 . 1 5 2 . 6 5 3 , 7 2 3 . 2 5 4 . 0 0 5 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 13 21 0 4 . 5 1 3 S A W C U T B I T U M I N O U S ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 2 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 7 5 2 , 0 5 6 . 2 5 1 . 8 1 2 , 1 2 6 . 7 5 1 . 8 0 2 , 1 1 5 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 3 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 14 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 C O M M O N E X C A V A T I O N ( P ) C Y 2 1 , 6 2 2 . 7 4 1 2 . 3 5 2 6 7 , 0 4 0 . 8 4 10 . 5 0 2 2 7 , 0 3 8 . 7 7 1 4 . 0 4 3 0 3 , 5 8 3 . 2 7 1 5 . 3 0 3 3 0 , 8 2 7 . 9 2 1 7 . 2 9 3 7 3 , 8 5 7 . 1 7 15 21 0 5 . 5 2 2 S E L E C T G R A N U L A R B O R R O W ( C V ) ( P ) C Y 1 0 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 2 4 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 2 5 1 3 5 , 8 1 2 . 5 0 2 3 . 9 0 2 4 4 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 2 7 . 4 0 2 8 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 4 . 5 2 2 5 1 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 16 21 0 5 . 5 2 5 T O P S O I L B O R R O W C Y 2 , 2 5 5 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 6 3 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 5 6 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 4 7 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 4 7 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 4 7 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 17 21 0 5 . 6 0 3 M I N O R G R A D I N G L F 1 6 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 0 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 9 . 9 0 1 , 5 8 4 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 4 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 18 21 0 5 . 6 0 4 G E O T E X T I L E F A B R I C T Y P E V S Y 3 0 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 8 5 2 6 , 06 1 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 7 6 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 1 7 3 5 , 8 7 2 . 2 0 1 . 1 0 3 3 , 7 2 6 . 0 0 1 . 1 0 3 3 , 7 2 6 . 0 0 19 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 T O N 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 3 5 . 0 0 16 . 0 0 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 9 1 1 7 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 1 1 . 9 0 1 6 0 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 6 1 7 6 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 20 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 8 5 5 . 0 0 1 7 . 5 0 1 4 , 96 2 . 5 0 1 8 . 0 0 1 5 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 7 4 1 1 , 7 4 7 . 7 0 1 6 . 1 0 1 3 , 7 6 5 . 5 0 1 8 . 2 5 1 5 , 6 0 3 . 7 5 21 22 3 2 . 5 0 1 M I L L B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 4 5 . 0 0 6 . 7 5 3 0 3 . 7 5 1 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 9 . 5 0 8 7 7 . 5 0 1 0 . 5 0 4 7 2 . 5 0 8 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 22 23 3 1 . 6 0 3 B I T U M I N O U S J O I N T C O N T R O L L F 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 3 3 1 5 , 1 4 5 . 0 0 3 . 5 0 2 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 5 8 1 6 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 2 . 6 5 1 7 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 3 . 1 9 2 0 , 7 3 5 . 0 0 23 23 5 7 . 5 0 2 B I T U M I N O U S M A T E R I A L F O R T A C K C O A T G A L 1 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 2 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 3 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 5 . 6 0 6 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 9 0 3 , 5 5 2 . 5 0 3 . 2 5 3 , 9 8 1 . 2 5 24 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 2 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 6 4 . 15 1 5 2 , 3 5 6 . 2 5 6 6 . 2 5 1 5 7 , 3 4 3 . 7 5 5 0 . 0 0 1 1 8 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 6 6 . 0 0 1 5 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 6 2 . 0 0 1 4 7 , 2 5 0 .00 25 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 9 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( T R A I L ) T O N 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 2 . 0 0 3 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 2 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . 26 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 1 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 1 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 8 . 0 0 2 0 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 11,400.00 27 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 N O N W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 3 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 3 . 40 1 9 3 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 7 5 2 0 0 , 5 3 7 . 5 0 4 9 . 5 0 1 5 0 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 6 5 . 6 0 2 0 0 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 . 6 5 1 8 1 , 9 32.50 28 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 I R R I G A T I O N R E P A I R E A C H 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 29 25 3 1 . 5 0 1 C O N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R B 6 1 8 L F 1 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 1 0 1 7 7 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 5 0 2 0 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 1 7 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 3 0 1 8 1 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 1 7 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 30 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 4 " C O N C R E T E W A L K S F 1 2 5 . 0 0 5 . 4 3 6 7 8 . 7 5 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 7 0 1 , 3 3 7 . 5 0 5 . 5 5 6 9 3 . 7 5 31 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 18 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 . 4 1 8 1 , 5 8 5 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 9 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 9 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 1 0 9 4 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 . 5 5 8 4 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 32 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( S P E C I A L ) ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 7 1 5, 0 8 4 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 9 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 1 0 5 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 1 9 . 3 0 7 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 6 5 5 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 33 25 3 1 . 6 1 8 T R U N C A T E D D O M E S S F 1 2 . 0 0 4 1 . 0 0 4 9 2 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 3 9 6 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 34 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , P L A S T I C ( R E P L A C E M E N T ) L F 9 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 2 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 2 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 6 . 5 0 5 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 35 25 4 0 . 6 1 8 I N S T A L L S A L V A G E D B R I C K P A V E R S S F 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 30 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 7 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 6 9 1 7 , 8 8 5 . 7 0 7 . 5 0 1 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 1 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 36 25 6 3 . 6 0 1 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L L S 1 . 0 0 3 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 37 25 6 4 . 5 3 1 F & I S I G N P A N E L S F 1 6 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 8 0 5 , 2 4 8 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 5 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 5 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 5 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 38 25 6 4 . 6 0 2 F & I S I G N P O S T E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 9 7 . 4 0 1 , 4 6 1 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 9 7 5 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 9 7 5 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 2 5 . 0 0 39 25 7 3 . 5 0 2 S I L T F E N C E T Y P E M A C H I N E S L I C E D L F 7 5 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 2 2 , 26 5 . 0 0 3 . 5 0 2 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 1 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 1 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 40 25 7 3 . 5 2 0 S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L B A C K H O E H R 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 6 . 0 0 5 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 41 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 T E M P O R A R Y R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E E A C H 3 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 42 25 7 3 . 6 0 7 R O A D W A Y R O C K C H E C K D A M C Y 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 6 . 8 0 8 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 43 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 1 3 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 7 , 1 5 0 . 00 2 5 . 0 0 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 6 9 . 2 5 9 , 0 0 2 . 5 0 6 9 . 3 0 9 , 0 0 9 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 44 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 S E E D I N G ( T Y P E 2 5 - 1 5 1 ) S Y 2 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 2 5 , 9 8 4 . 0 0 1 . 50 3 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 3 5 2 7 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 2 . 7 0 5 4 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 1 . 5 0 3 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 45 25 7 5 . 6 0 7 L A N D S C A P E R O C K C Y 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 6 6 . 3 0 3 , 3 1 5 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 46 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 5 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 47 SP E C PR O C T O R T E S T EA C H 50 0 15 5 0 0 77 5 0 0 14 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 750 00 150 00 750 00 150 00 750 00 47 SP E C PR O C T O R TE S T EA C H 5 .00 15 5 .00 77 5 .00 14 0 .00 70 0 .00 15 0 .00 750 .00 150 .00 750 .00 150 .00 750 .00 48 SP E C G R A D A T I O N T E S T E A C H 5 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 49 SP E C A I R V O I D S E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 24 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 50 SP E C C O N C R E T E T E S T I N G , C Y L I N D E R S ( S E T O F 3 ) E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 21 5 . 0 0 3 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 51 SP E C E X T R A C T I O N / G R A D A T I O N E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 2 5 5 . 0 0 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 14 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 52 SP E C N U C L E A R B I T U M I N O U S D E N S I T Y E A C H 4 0 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 1 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) - - T O T A L 1, 6 2 2 , 2 4 8 . 7 9 1 , 6 5 0 , 2 4 7 . 8 1 1 , 7 3 1 , 4 7 4 . 4 7 1 , 8 3 7 , 9 2 8 . 8 2 1 , 7 6 1 , 7 8 6 . 9 2 3 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M S E W E R 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E S E W E R P I P E ( S T O R M ) L F 8 8 9 . 0 0 7 . 0 0 6 , 2 2 3 . 0 0 1 2 . 2 5 1 0 , 8 9 0 . 2 5 7 . 2 7 6 , 4 6 3 . 0 3 1 0 . 2 0 9 , 0 6 7 . 8 0 8 . 0 0 7 , 1 1 2 . 0 0 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E F E N C E L F 1 6 5 . 0 0 4 . 1 0 6 7 6 . 5 0 7 . 0 0 1 , 1 5 5 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 7 . 4 0 1 , 2 2 1 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E E A C H 4 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 2 5 . 0 0 1 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 6 4 . 0 0 1 8 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E B E N C H E A C H 1 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 6 . 0 0 7 7 6 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 P O N D E X C A V A T I O N ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) ( C V ) C Y 2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 4 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 0 3 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 2 9 . 4 8 7 5 , 1 7 4 . 0 0 1 6 . 5 0 4 2 , 0 7 5 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 25 0 2 . 6 0 3 6 - I N C H P E R F T P P I P E D R A I N W / S O C K L F 2 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 6 . 9 5 1 4 2 , 1 2 7 . 5 0 8 . 2 5 1 6 8 , 7 1 2 . 5 0 5 . 6 4 1 1 5 , 3 3 8 . 0 0 5 . 5 0 1 1 2 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 6 . 6 0 1 3 4 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 7 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 2 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 8 . 5 0 2 4 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 2 6 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 1 . 0 0 3 4 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 4 2 . 3 0 3 5 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 3 2 . 4 9 2 7 , 6 1 6 . 5 0 8 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 5 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 2 8 . 5 0 9 3 , 3 9 4 . 5 0 3 2 . 0 0 1 0 4 , 8 6 4 . 0 0 4 3 . 0 0 1 4 0 , 9 1 1 . 0 0 4 1 . 6 0 1 3 6 , 3 2 3 . 2 0 3 1 . 3 0 1 0 2 , 5 7 0 . 1 0 9 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 1 8 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 6 5 . 0 0 3 4 . 5 0 2 , 2 4 2 . 5 0 3 9 . 0 0 2 , 5 3 5 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 4 7 . 2 0 3 , 0 6 8 . 0 0 3 6 . 7 2 2 , 3 8 6 . 8 0 10 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 1 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 3 7 . 0 0 3 , 0 3 4 . 0 0 4 2 . 0 0 3 , 4 4 4 . 0 0 5 3 . 0 0 4 , 3 4 6 . 0 0 4 9 . 7 0 4 , 0 7 5 . 4 0 3 7 . 1 1 3 , 0 4 3 . 0 2 11 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 4 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 3 8 . 7 5 3 , 1 7 7 . 5 0 4 6 . 0 0 3 , 7 7 2 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 4 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 5 2 . 2 0 4 , 2 8 0 . 4 0 4 0 . 0 8 3 , 2 8 6 . 5 6 12 25 0 3 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G S T O R M S E W E R E A C H 2 3 . 0 0 4 0 5 . 0 0 9 , 3 1 5 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 5 6 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 2 . 0 0 2 0 , 9 7 6 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 13 25 0 3 . 6 0 3 4 " P V C S E R V I C E P I P E S C H 4 0 L F 1 2 0 . 0 0 3 7 . 2 5 4 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 0 1 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 3 8 . 6 0 4 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 3 3 . 1 0 3 , 9 7 2 . 0 0 3 1 . 9 3 3 , 8 3 1 . 6 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E A D J U S T M E N T E A C H 6 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 9 0 0 . 0 0 7 9 7 . 0 0 4 , 7 8 2 . 0 0 6 4 7 . 0 0 3 , 8 8 2 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 15 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E ( A D J U S T M E N T ) L F 2 4 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 7 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 4 6 , 2 4 9 . 6 0 2 5 . 1 0 6 , 0 2 4 . 0 0 3 0 . 1 0 7 , 2 2 4 . 0 0 16 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N S P E C 2 4 " X 3 6 " E A C H 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 3 6 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 5 1 . 0 0 4 2 , 9 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 3 3 , 6 6 0 . 00 1,586.00 34,892.00 17 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 4 8 - 4 0 2 0 E A C H 3 9 . 0 0 2 , 1 6 5 . 0 0 8 4 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 8 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 1 8 . 0 0 1 0 2 , 1 0 2 . 0 0 2 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 7 8 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 1 , 869.00 72,891.00 18 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 6 0 - 4 0 2 0 E A C H 1 . 0 0 3 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 3 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 5 2 6 . 0 0 3 , 5 2 6 . 0 0 2 , 9 1 0 . 0 0 2 , 9 1 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 7 1 . 0 0 2,671.00 19 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 4 8 - 4 0 2 0 ( S U M P ) E A C H 5 . 0 0 6 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 3 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 1 1 1 . 0 0 3 5 , 5 5 5 . 0 0 7 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 3 6 , 4 5 0 .00 6,855.00 34,275.00 20 25 0 6 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T S T O R M S T R U C T U R E E A C H 1 . 0 0 6 , 0 3 5 . 0 0 6 , 0 3 5 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 6 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 6 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 21 25 1 1 5 0 1 RA N D O M R I P R A P C L A S S I V CY 13 0 0 0 95 0 0 12 3 5 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 19 500 00 103 00 13 390 00 75 00 9 750 00 21 25 1 1 .50 1 RA N D O M RI P RA P CL A S S IV CY 13 0 .00 95 .00 12 ,35 0 .00 10 0 .00 13 ,00 0 .00 15 0 .00 19 ,500 .00 103 .00 13 ,390 .00 75 .00 9 ,750 .00 22 25 1 1 . 6 0 7 G R A N U L A R B E D D I N G , R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ( C V ) C Y 8 1 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 3 0 2 5 , 3 8 4 . 3 0 2 0 . 0 0 1 6 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 2 1 . 9 3 1 7 , 7 8 5 . 2 3 3 6 . 8 0 2 9 , 8 4 4 . 8 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 4 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 23 25 4 0 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L S A L V A G E D B E N C H E A C H 1 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 24 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , S T E E L ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) L F 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 . 0 0 2 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 2 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 5 0 1 7 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 . 9 0 2 1 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 6 . 5 0 2 0 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 25 25 4 0 . 6 1 8 R O C K R E T A I N I N G W A L L S F 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 4 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 26 25 5 4 . 6 0 2 1 2 " F L A R E D E N D S E C T I O N W / T R A S H G U A R D E A C H 2 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 4 1 2 . 0 0 2 , 8 2 4 . 0 0 8 1 5 . 0 0 1 , 6 3 0 . 0 0 6 8 5 . 0 0 1 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 27 25 5 7 . 6 0 3 S P L I T R A I L W O O D F E N C E L F 2 9 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 3 0 3 , 5 6 7 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 3 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 3 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 8 0 4 , 5 8 2 . 0 0 1 5 . 7 5 4 , 5 6 7 . 5 0 28 25 7 1 . 5 4 1 T R A N S P L A N T T R E E T R E E 4 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 5 . 0 0 9 0 0 . 0 0 29 25 7 3 . 5 3 0 I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N ( W I M C O ) E A C H 9 2 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 8 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 1 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 0 . 0 0 1 1 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 30 25 7 3 . 5 3 0 I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N ( S T R U C T U R E W / O C A S T I N G ) E A C H 6 1 . 0 0 1 4 5 . 0 0 8 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 9 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 3 0 . 0 0 7 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 2 6 7 . 0 0 1 6 , 2 8 7 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 31 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 I N L E T S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L E A C H 7 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 9 4 . 0 0 1 4 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 32 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 8 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 00 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 6 9 . 2 5 5 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 6 9 . 3 0 5 , 5 4 4 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 33 25 7 5 . 5 2 3 E R O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T ( C A T E G O R Y 6 ) S Y 3 5 . 0 0 7 . 7 0 2 6 9 . 5 0 8 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 2 6 2 . 5 0 2 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 3 . 3 0 1 1 5 . 5 0 34 25 7 5 . 5 5 0 C O M P O S T G R A D E 2 C Y 1 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 35 SP E C T R A C E W I R E ( D R A I N T I L E ) L F 2 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 3 5 7 , 1 5 7 . 50 0 . 1 5 3 , 0 6 7 . 5 0 0 . 4 2 8 , 5 8 9 . 0 0 0 . 7 2 1 4 , 7 2 4 . 0 0 0 . 4 2 8 , 5 8 9 . 0 0 36 SP E C D R A I N T I L E C O N N E C T I O N S T U B E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 5 0 . 00 8 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 9 . 0 0 8 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 1 9 5 . 0 0 4 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 37 SP E C S T E E L F I B E R ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) T O N S 6 5 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 0 8 2 , 22 5 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 7 5 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 0 . 0 0 3 5 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 38 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 3 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 39 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 1 5 5 . 0 0 4 6 5 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 00 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 4 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M - - T O T A L 74 5 , 7 6 8 . 8 0 7 4 1 , 3 1 0 . 2 5 8 6 2 , 6 2 1 . 3 6 8 8 2 , 0 9 7 . 6 0 7 7 3 , 5 1 6 . 5 8 SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 6 , 7 6 5 . 0 0 1 0 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 1 0 3 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 1 0 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 183.57 92,753.55 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 3 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 3 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 1 4 4 . 0 0 5 , 1 4 4 . 0 0 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 4 , 5 1 1 . 0 0 4 , 5 1 1 .00 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E G A T E V A L V E E A C H 5 . 0 0 2 , 6 1 7 . 0 0 1 3 , 0 8 5 . 0 0 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 1 9 3 . 0 0 2 0 , 9 6 5 . 0 0 2 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 1 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 9 2 . 0 0 1 5 , 4 6 0 .00 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E H Y D R A N T E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 3 3 6 . 5 0 5 , 0 4 7 . 5 0 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 9 . 0 0 5 , 0 8 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E V A L V E E A C H 1 9 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 1 . 0 0 2 , 6 7 9 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 6 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E W A T E R S E R V I C E ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) E A C H 3 . 0 0 2 8 5 . 0 0 8 5 5 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 8 6 1 . 0 0 2 , 5 8 3 . 0 0 2 8 7 . 0 0 8 6 1 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 9 7 5 . 0 0 7 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N W A T E R M A I N L F 6 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 3 . 9 0 2 5 , 3 6 9 . 5 0 1 1 . 0 0 7 1 , 5 5 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 3 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 3 . 9 0 2 5 , 3 6 9 . 5 0 8 . 0 0 5 2 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N S E R V I C E L F 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 0 . 5 2 1 , 4 3 2 . 6 0 3 . 0 0 8 , 2 6 5 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 5 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 5 2 1 , 4 3 2 . 6 0 4 . 0 0 1 1 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 9 25 0 3 . 6 0 4 4 " I N S U L A T I O N S Y 4 0 . 0 0 9 3 8 . 5 0 3 7 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 4 7 . 0 0 1 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 9 4 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 10 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R S E R V I C E L S 1 . 0 0 2 6 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 7 3 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 7 3 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 11 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 3 4 5 . 0 0 3 4 5 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 5 . 0 0 2 6 5 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 12 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G W A T E R M A I N E A C H 1 4 . 0 0 1 , 8 5 8 . 0 0 2 6 , 0 1 2 . 0 0 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 5 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 4 . 0 0 1 0 , 8 3 6 . 0 0 1 , 8 7 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 4 0 0 .00 13 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 4 , 9 3 7 . 0 0 7 4 , 0 5 5 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 4 0 9 . 0 0 9 6 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 4 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 7 4 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 6 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 6 " G A T E V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 1 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 3 0 6 . 0 0 3 4 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 1 1 . 0 0 1 6 , 6 6 5 . 0 0 15 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 1 2 " B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 4 . 0 0 1 , 8 5 5 . 0 0 7 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 9 4 5 . 0 0 1 1 , 7 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 8 7 0 . 0 0 7 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 7 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 16 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N E A C H 8 8 . 0 0 6 0 4 . 0 0 5 3 , 1 5 2 . 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 3 . 0 0 1 1 0 , 2 6 4 . 0 0 6 0 8 . 0 0 5 3 , 5 0 4 . 0 0 1 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 1 4 7 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 17 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E L F 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 9 0 8 5 , 1 2 9 . 5 0 2 0 . 0 0 5 5 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 4 7 1 , 7 4 0 . 2 0 3 1 . 1 0 8 5 , 6 8 0 . 5 0 2 8 . 3 5 7 8 , 1 0 4 . 2 5 18 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 6 " W A T E R M A I N L F 5 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 0 1 3 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 3 9 . 0 0 2 0 9 , 4 3 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 6 4 1 4 8 , 4 2 6 . 8 0 2 6 . 2 0 1 4 0 , 6 9 4 . 0 0 2 9 . 5 4 1 5 8 , 6 2 9 . 8 0 19 25 0 4 6 0 3 12 " WA T E R M A I N LF 1 2 9 5 0 0 41 4 0 53 6 1 3 0 0 50 0 0 64 7 5 0 0 0 42 9 7 55 646 15 41 70 54 001 50 44 57 57 718 15 19 25 0 4 .60 3 12 WA T E R M A I N LF 1 ,29 5 .00 41 .40 53 ,61 3 .00 50 .00 64 ,75 0 .00 42 .97 55 ,646 .15 41 .70 54 ,001 .50 44 .57 57 ,718 .15 20 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 3 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 21 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 1 5 5 . 0 0 4 6 5 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 00 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L 67 9 , 4 6 6 . 1 0 8 8 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 7 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 1 5 6 8 3 , 7 4 2 . 1 0 7 5 3 , 1 0 6 . 7 5 SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E S E W E R P I P E ( S A N I T A R Y ) L F 1 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 5 5 1 5 5 . 5 0 1 4 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 6 0 1 5 6 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 2 25 0 3 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G S A N I T A R Y S E W E R E A C H 2 . 0 0 1 8 0 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 6 . 0 0 2 9 2 . 0 0 1 8 1 . 0 0 3 6 2 . 0 0 7 9 8 . 0 0 1 , 5 9 6 . 0 0 3 25 0 3 . 6 0 3 8 " P V C S A N I T A R Y S E W E R M A I N L F 1 0 . 0 0 6 1 . 9 0 6 1 9 . 0 0 8 1 . 0 0 8 1 0 . 0 0 2 0 4 . 0 0 2 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 6 2 . 3 0 6 2 3 . 0 0 8 5 . 5 0 8 5 5 . 0 0 4 25 0 6 . 5 2 2 A D J U S T F R A M E R I N G A N D C A S T I N G E A C H 5 3 . 0 0 8 8 5 . 0 0 4 6 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 7 1 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 8 9 5 . 0 0 8 8 5 . 0 0 4 6 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 1 , 1 7 0 . 0 0 6 2 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 9 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 25 0 6 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T S A N I T A R Y S T R U C T U R E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 7 8 5 . 0 0 1 1 , 7 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 5 , 4 6 5 . 0 0 9 4 6 . 0 0 1 4 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R - - T O T A L 59 , 8 1 4 . 5 0 6 2 , 0 4 5 . 0 0 6 4 , 8 0 2 . 0 0 7 7 , 3 4 1 . 0 0 6 3 , 4 5 1 . 0 0 5 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E 1 25 3 5 . 5 0 1 B I T U M I N O U S C U R B L F 8 5 1 . 0 0 6 . 5 0 5 , 5 3 1 . 5 0 9 . 0 0 7 , 6 5 9 . 0 0 3 . 4 0 2 , 8 9 3 . 4 0 6 . 8 5 5 , 8 2 9 . 3 5 1 0 . 0 0 8 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 2 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 R E S T O R A T I O N S Y 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 8 . 2 0 3 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E - - T O T A L 9, 9 3 1 . 5 0 1 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 0 6 , 0 9 3 . 4 0 9 , 1 0 9 . 3 5 9 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 AL T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R 1 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 2 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 5 0 . 0 0 3 7 . 2 2 3 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 2 6 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 4 . 0 1 3 7 , 4 0 8 . 5 0 3 8 . 3 0 3 2 , 5 5 5 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 4 2 8 , 0 8 4 . 0 0 2 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 5 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 9 8 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 0 1 0 8 , 1 4 1 . 0 0 4 6 . 3 5 1 5 1 , 8 8 8 . 9 5 3 8 . 8 0 1 2 7 , 1 4 7 . 6 0 3 2 . 5 0 1 0 6 , 5 0 2 . 5 0 3 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 1 8 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 6 5 . 0 0 4 4 . 5 0 2 , 8 9 2 . 5 0 3 6 . 0 0 2 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 4 8 3 , 2 8 1 . 2 0 4 5 . 2 0 2 , 9 3 8 . 0 0 3 8 . 8 5 2 , 5 2 5 . 2 5 4 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 1 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 5 1 . 4 0 4 , 2 1 4 . 8 0 4 6 . 0 0 3 , 7 7 2 . 0 0 6 1 . 0 3 5 , 0 0 4 . 4 6 5 1 . 8 0 4 , 2 4 7 . 6 0 4 4 . 6 4 3 , 6 6 0 . 4 8 5 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 4 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 5 1 . 2 5 4 , 2 0 2 . 5 0 4 6 . 0 0 3 , 7 7 2 . 0 0 6 1 . 0 3 5 , 0 0 4 . 4 6 5 1 . 8 0 4 , 2 4 7 . 6 0 4 6 . 0 8 3 , 7 7 8 . 5 6 6 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 D E D U C T 1 2 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 8 . 5 0 - 2 4 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 - 2 6 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 4 1 . 0 0 - 3 4 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 4 2 . 3 0 - 3 5 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 3 2 . 4 8 - 2 7 , 6 0 8 . 0 0 7 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 D E D U C T 1 5 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F - 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 2 8 . 5 0 - 9 3 , 3 9 4 . 5 0 3 2 . 0 0 - 1 0 4 , 8 6 4 . 0 0 4 3 . 0 0 - 1 4 0 , 9 1 1 . 0 0 4 1 . 5 6 - 1 3 6 , 1 9 2 . 1 2 3 1 . 3 0 - 1 0 2 , 5 7 0 . 10 8 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 1 8 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 6 5 . 0 0 3 4 . 5 0 - 2 , 2 4 2 . 5 0 3 9 . 0 0 - 2 , 5 3 5 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 - 2 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 4 7 . 2 4 - 3 , 0 7 0 . 6 0 3 6 . 7 2 - 2 , 3 8 6 . 8 0 9 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 2 1 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 2 . 0 0 3 7 . 0 0 - 3 , 0 3 4 . 0 0 4 2 . 0 0 - 3 , 4 4 4 . 0 0 5 3 . 0 0 - 4 , 3 4 6 . 0 0 4 9 . 7 1 - 4 , 0 7 6 . 2 2 3 7 . 1 1 - 3 , 0 4 3 . 0 2 10 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 2 4 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 2 . 0 0 3 8 . 7 5 - 3 , 1 7 7 . 5 0 4 6 . 0 0 - 3 , 7 7 2 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 - 4 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 5 2 . 1 7 - 4 , 2 7 7 . 9 4 4 0 . 0 8 - 3 , 2 8 6 . 5 6 A L T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R - - T O T A L 15 , 1 8 3 . 3 0 3 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 4 5 . 5 7 - 1 2 , 4 3 6 . 0 8 5 , 6 5 6 . 3 1 AL T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N 1 21 0 4 5 0 9 RE M O V E A N D R E P L A C E H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E EA C H 40 0 5 7 7 2 0 0 23 0 8 8 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 9 0 0 0 27 560 00 5 811 23 23 244 92 6 183 57 24 734 28 1 21 0 4 .50 9 RE M O V E AN D RE P L A C E HY D R A N T AN D VA L V E EA C H -4 .00 5 ,77 2 .00 -23 ,08 8 .00 7 ,50 0 .00 -30 ,00 0 .00 6 ,89 0 .00 -27 ,560 .00 5 ,811 .23 -23 ,244 .92 6 ,183 .57 -24 ,734 .28 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E H Y D R A N T E A C H 4 . 0 0 3 3 6 . 5 0 1 , 3 4 6 . 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 9 . 0 0 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 1 . 0 0 1 4 1 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N W A T E R M A I N L F 2 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 3 . 9 0 9 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 1 0 . 5 0 2 4 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 4 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 3 . 9 0 9 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 1 8 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N S E R V I C E L F 9 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 5 2 4 9 4 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 5 2 4 9 4 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 6 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R S E R V I C E L S 1 . 0 0 9 , 2 6 6 . 0 0 9 , 2 6 6 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 9 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T V A L V E E A C H - 1 . 0 0 3 4 7 . 0 0 - 3 4 7 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 0 - 3 2 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 - 4 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 6 . 6 6 - 2 7 6 . 6 6 3 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 0 0 . 0 0 8 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G W A T E R M A I N E A C H - 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 9 4 . 0 0 - 1 2 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 4 . 0 0 - 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 0 2 . 9 7 - 1 3 , 0 2 9 . 7 0 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 1,000.00 9 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 4 . 0 0 4 , 9 3 6 . 0 0 1 9 , 7 4 4 . 0 0 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 4 0 9 . 0 0 2 5 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 4 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 7 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 10 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 8 " G A T E V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 1 . 0 0 1 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 3 9 8 . 0 0 2 , 3 9 8 . 0 0 1 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 11 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N E A C H 3 4 . 0 0 6 0 4 . 0 0 2 0 , 5 3 6 . 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 4 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 3 . 0 0 4 2 , 6 0 2 . 0 0 6 0 8 . 0 0 2 0 , 6 7 2 . 0 0 1 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 5 6 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 12 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E L F 9 5 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 9 0 2 9 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 2 1 . 0 0 1 9 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 4 2 4 , 7 3 8 . 0 0 3 1 . 1 0 2 9 , 5 4 5 . 0 0 2 8 . 3 5 2 6 , 9 3 2 . 5 0 13 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 6 " W A T E R M A I N L F 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 0 4 9 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 3 9 . 0 0 7 4 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 2 3 . 6 4 4 5 , 3 8 8 . 8 0 2 6 . 2 0 5 0 , 3 0 4 . 0 0 2 9 . 5 4 5 6 , 7 1 6 . 8 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 2 " W A T E R M A I N L F 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 . 4 0 1 6 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 8 . 9 7 1 5 , 5 8 8 . 0 0 4 1 . 7 0 1 6 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 4 5 . 7 8 1 8 , 3 1 2 . 0 0 A L T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L 12 1 , 7 4 4 . 0 0 1 8 3 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 1 3 3 , 6 9 0 . 8 0 1 2 2 , 6 1 8 . 7 2 1 7 2 , 2 6 2 . 0 2 6 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N PA L D A & S O N S , I N C . P A R K C O N S T R U C T I O N C O . N O R T H W E S T A S P H A L T , I N C . NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E QT Y ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) VA L L E Y P A V I N G , I n c . A S T E C H C O R P . BI D S U M M A R Y - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) - - T O T A L 65 7 , 8 2 3 . 1 9 7 0 0 , 4 2 4 . 6 5 7 2 4 , 9 1 9 . 6 8 7 3 8 , 6 7 7 . 4 6 9 9 7 , 0 8 6 . 0 8 SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) - - T O T A L 1, 6 2 2 , 2 4 8 . 7 9 1 , 6 5 0 , 2 4 7 . 8 1 1 , 7 3 1 , 4 7 4 . 4 7 1 , 8 3 7 , 9 2 8 . 8 2 1 , 7 6 1 , 7 8 6 . 9 2 SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M - - T O T A L 74 5 , 7 6 8 . 8 0 7 4 1 , 3 1 0 . 2 5 8 6 2 , 6 2 1 . 3 6 8 8 2 , 0 9 7 . 6 0 7 7 3 , 5 1 6 . 5 8 SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L 67 9 , 4 6 6 . 1 0 8 8 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 7 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 1 5 6 8 3 , 7 4 2 . 1 0 7 5 3 , 1 0 6 . 7 5 SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R - - T O T A L 59 , 8 1 4 . 5 0 6 2 , 0 4 5 . 0 0 6 4 , 8 0 2 . 0 0 7 7 , 3 4 1 . 0 0 6 3 , 4 5 1 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E - - T O T A L 9, 9 3 1 . 5 0 1 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 0 6 , 0 9 3 . 4 0 9 , 1 0 9 . 3 5 9 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 TO T A L B A S E B I D 3 , 7 7 5 , 0 5 2 . 8 8 4 , 0 4 9 , 8 0 6 . 7 2 4 , 1 6 1 , 1 3 1 . 0 6 4 , 2 2 8 , 8 9 6 . 3 3 4 , 3 5 8 , 6 5 7 . 3 4 A L T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R - - T O T A L 15 , 1 8 3 . 3 0 3 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 4 5 . 5 7 - 1 2 , 4 3 6 . 0 8 5 , 6 5 6 . 3 1 A L T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L 12 1 , 7 4 4 . 0 0 1 8 3 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 1 3 3 , 6 9 0 . 8 0 1 2 2 , 6 1 8 . 7 2 1 7 2 , 2 6 2 . 0 2 TO T A L B A S E B I D W I T H A L T E R N A T E S 3 , 9 1 1 , 9 8 0 . 1 8 4 , 2 3 6 , 4 3 6 . 7 2 4 , 3 0 9 , 8 6 7 . 4 3 4 , 3 3 9 , 0 7 8 . 9 7 4 , 5 3 6 , 5 7 5 . 6 7 IN D I C A T E S N U M B E R S C O R R E C T E D F R O M B I D A S S U B M I T T E D : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S I S A N A C C U R A T E T A B U L A T I O N O F T H E B I D S RE C E I V E D F O R T H E A B O V E M E N T I O N E D P R O J E C T . NA M E : K r i s t i n a E l f e r i n g P E NA M E : Kr i s t i n a El f e r i n g , P .E . DA T E : M a r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 MN R E G . N O . : 4 2 3 5 0 7 BI D T A B U L A T I O N PR O J E C T : 20 1 5 P M P I M P R O V E M E N T S OW N E R : CI T Y O F A R D E N H I L L S OP E N I N G D A T E : Ma r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 EN G I N E E R : EL F E R I N G & A S S O C I A T E S IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) 1 20 2 1 . 5 0 1 M O B I L I Z A T I O N L S 1 . 0 0 2 21 0 1 . 5 0 2 C L E A R I N G T R E E 8 . 0 0 3 21 0 1 . 5 0 7 G R U B B I N G T R E E 8 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 10 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 40 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 41 6 . 0 0 3 , 3 2 8 . 0 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T S Y 6 2 5 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 1 4 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 6 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E S I G N E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 7 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X E A C H 7 9 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 5 1 1 S A W C U T C O N C R E T E ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 9 21 0 4 . 5 1 3 S A W C U T B I T U M I N O U S ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 9 0 0 . 0 0 10 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 C O M M O N E X C A V A T I O N ( P ) C Y 7 , 8 1 5 . 8 2 11 21 0 5 . 5 0 7 S U B G R A D E E X C A V A T I O N C Y 5 8 0 . 0 0 12 21 0 5 . 5 2 2 S E L E C T G R A N U L A R B O R R O W ( C V ) C Y 5 8 0 . 0 0 13 21 0 5 . 5 2 5 T O P S O I L B O R R O W C Y 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 14 21 0 5 . 6 0 4 G E O T E X T I L E F A B R I C T Y P E V S Y 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 15 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 T O N 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 16 22 1 1 5 0 1 AG G R E G A T E B A S E C L A S S 7 ( D R I V E W A Y ) TO N 65 0 0 0 4. 1 6 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 1 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 7 5 7 , 3 4 3 . 7 5 3. 1 2 4 4 , 1 7 9 . 2 0 2 . 3 8 3 3 , 7 0 0 . 8 0 2 . 9 0 4 1 , 0 6 4 . 0 0 35 . 0 0 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 35 . 0 0 2 , 7 6 5 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 5 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 2. 0 0 2 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 6 0 3 , 7 4 4 . 0 0 2. 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 8 0 1 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 12 . 5 0 9 7 , 6 9 7 . 7 5 2 4 . 6 2 1 9 2 , 4 2 5 . 4 9 2 6 . 7 5 2 0 9 , 0 7 3 . 1 9 13 . 0 0 7 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 . 2 0 8 , 2 3 6 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 14 . 5 6 8 , 4 4 4 . 8 0 1 9 . 5 8 1 1 , 3 5 6 . 4 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 7 , 9 8 0 . 0 0 21 . 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 . 8 0 1 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2. 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 9 0 3 , 3 2 5 . 0 0 1 . 8 0 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 12 . 5 0 7 8 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 1 2 . 8 4 8 0 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 2 5 9 5 , 3 1 2 . 5 0 13 5 0 8 7 7 5 0 0 12 8 4 8 346 00 26 00 16 900 00 16 22 1 1 .50 1 AG G R E G A T E BA S E , CL A S S 7 (D R I V E W A Y ) TO N 65 0 .00 17 22 3 2 . 5 0 1 M I L L B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 6 0 . 0 0 18 23 3 1 . 6 0 3 B I T U M I N O U S J O I N T C O N T R O L L F 2 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 19 23 5 7 . 5 0 2 B I T U M I N O U S M A T E R I A L F O R T A C K C O A T G A L 5 6 5 . 0 0 20 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 21 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 9 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( T R A I L ) T O N 1 5 . 0 0 22 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 3 0 . 0 0 23 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 N O N W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 24 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 I R R I G A T I O N R E P A I R E A C H 1 0 . 0 0 25 25 3 1 . 5 0 1 C O N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R B 6 1 8 L F 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 26 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 4 " C O N C R E T E W A L K S F 2 1 0 . 0 0 27 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 1 1 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 28 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( S P E C I A L ) ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 3 0 0 . 0 0 13 .50 8 ,77 5 .00 12 .84 8 ,346 .00 26 .00 16 ,900 .00 10 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 2. 9 6 8 , 0 8 0 . 8 0 2 . 5 8 7 , 0 4 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 0 6 , 2 7 9 . 0 0 3. 0 0 1 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 1 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 1 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 66 . 0 0 7 5 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 6 1 . 0 0 7 0 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 5 9 . 2 5 6 8 , 1 3 7 . 5 0 15 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 9 5 . 5 0 1 , 4 3 2 . 5 0 15 0 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 5 . 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 5 . 0 0 4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 66 . 0 0 9 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 5 0 9 0 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 5 8 . 7 5 8 8 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 41 6 . 0 0 4 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 4 . 0 0 9 4 0 . 0 0 11 . 5 4 9 3 , 4 7 4 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 7 9 , 7 8 5 . 0 0 1 1 . 2 5 9 1 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 4. 4 2 9 2 8 . 2 0 5 . 8 0 1 , 2 1 8 . 0 0 4 . 3 0 9 0 3 . 0 0 4. 4 7 5 0 , 5 5 5 . 7 0 4 . 8 0 5 4 , 2 8 8 . 0 0 4 . 4 0 4 9 , 7 6 4 . 0 0 6. 4 5 1 , 9 3 5 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 0 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 6 . 3 0 1 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 29 25 3 1 . 6 1 8 T R U N C A T E D D O M E S S F 4 8 . 0 0 30 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , P L A S T I C ( R E P L A C E M E N T ) L F 4 0 0 . 0 0 31 25 6 3 . 6 0 1 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L L S 1 . 0 0 32 25 6 4 . 5 3 1 F & I S I G N P A N E L S F 1 5 0 . 0 0 33 25 6 4 . 6 0 2 F & I S I G N P O S T E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 34 25 7 3 . 5 0 2 S I L T F E N C E T Y P E M A C H I N E S L I C E D L F 4 6 5 . 0 0 35 25 7 3 . 5 2 0 S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L B A C K H O E H R 2 0 . 0 0 31 . 2 0 1 , 4 9 7 . 6 0 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 5 0 1 , 4 6 4 . 0 0 6. 2 4 2 , 4 9 6 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 55 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 35 . 3 6 5 , 3 0 4 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 67 . 6 0 1 , 0 8 1 . 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 3. 3 8 1 , 5 7 1 . 7 0 3 . 1 0 1 , 4 4 1 . 5 0 3 . 1 0 1 , 4 4 1 . 5 0 14 5 . 6 0 2 , 9 1 2 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 0 . 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 8 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y 36 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 T E M P O R A R Y R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E E A C H 3 . 0 0 37 25 7 3 . 6 0 7 R O A D W A Y R O C K C H E C K D A M C Y 1 0 0 . 0 0 38 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 1 4 0 . 0 0 39 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 S E E D I N G ( T Y P E 2 5 - 1 5 1 ) S Y 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 40 25 7 5 . 6 0 7 L A N D S C A P E R O C K C Y 3 0 . 0 0 41 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 42 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 43 SP E C G R A D A T I O N T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 44 SP E C A I R V O I D S E A C H 6 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 78 0 . 0 0 2 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 4 . 0 0 1 , 5 4 2 . 0 0 45 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 . 0 0 4 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 48 . 0 0 6 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 . 5 0 5 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 1. 3 5 1 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 1 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 3 0 1 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 48 . 0 0 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 3 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 6 7 5 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 9 0 . 0 0 2 7 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 45 SP E C C O N C R E T E T E S T I N G , C Y L I N D E R S ( S E T O F 3 ) E A C H 6 . 0 0 46 SP E C E X T R A C T I O N / G R A D A T I O N E A C H 6 . 0 0 47 SP E C N U C L E A R B I T U M I N O U S D E N S I T Y E A C H 1 8 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) 1 20 2 1 . 5 0 1 M O B I L I Z A T I O N L S 1 . 0 0 2 21 0 1 . 5 0 2 C L E A R I N G T R E E 1 5 . 0 0 3 21 0 1 . 5 0 7 G R U B B I N G T R E E 1 5 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E C U R B A N D G U T T E R L F 2 5 4 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 5 R E M O V E C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T S Y 1 , 0 5 5 . 0 0 6 21 0 4 5 0 5 RE M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T SY 31 2 5 0 0 0 22 5 . 0 0 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 25 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 4 8 6 . 0 0 83 6 , 5 2 6 . 3 5 8 8 3 , 8 9 0 . 5 9 9 0 0 , 8 6 1 . 9 4 15 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 41 6 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 41 6 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2. 0 8 5 2 8 . 3 2 3 . 0 0 7 6 2 . 0 0 2 . 8 0 7 1 1 . 2 0 4. 1 6 4 , 3 8 8 . 8 0 1 8 . 0 0 1 8 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 1 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 44 2 13 8 1 2 5 0 0 23 8 74 375 00 29 0 90 625 00 6 21 0 4 .50 5 RE M O V E BI T U M I N O U S PA V E M E N T SY 31 ,25 0 .00 7 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E S I G N E A C H 6 1 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X E A C H 1 0 4 . 0 0 9 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E M A I L B O X ( S P E C I A L ) E A C H 1 . 0 0 10 21 0 4 . 6 1 8 S A L V A G E B R I C K P A V E R S S F 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 11 21 0 4 . 6 1 8 S A L V A G E R E T A I N I N G W A L L S F 8 0 . 0 0 12 21 0 4 . 5 1 1 S A W C U T C O N C R E T E ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 13 21 0 4 . 5 1 3 S A W C U T B I T U M I N O U S ( F U L L D E P T H ) L F 1 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 14 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 C O M M O N E X C A V A T I O N ( P ) C Y 2 1 , 6 2 2 . 7 4 15 21 0 5 . 5 2 2 S E L E C T G R A N U L A R B O R R O W ( C V ) ( P ) C Y 1 0 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 16 21 0 5 . 5 2 5 T O P S O I L B O R R O W C Y 2 , 2 5 5 . 0 0 17 21 0 5 . 6 0 3 M I N O R G R A D I N G L F 1 6 0 . 0 0 18 21 0 5 . 6 0 4 G E O T E X T I L E F A B R I C T Y P E V S Y 3 0 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 4 .42 13 8 ,12 5 .00 2 .38 74 ,375 .00 2 .90 90 ,625 .00 50 . 0 0 3 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 35 . 0 0 3 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 7 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 40 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 0 . 7 5 9 0 . 7 5 4. 6 0 7 , 0 3 8 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 10 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 2. 0 0 2 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 2 . 7 5 3 , 8 6 3 . 7 5 2 . 6 0 3 , 6 5 3 . 0 0 2. 0 0 2 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 0 0 2 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 . 8 0 2 , 1 1 5 . 0 0 12 . 5 0 2 7 0 , 2 8 4 . 2 5 2 2 . 1 8 4 7 9 , 5 9 2 . 3 7 2 5 . 2 5 5 4 5 , 9 7 4 . 1 9 14 . 5 6 1 4 9 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 1 9 . 5 8 2 0 0 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 3 1 7 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 21 . 0 0 4 7 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 1 4 . 8 0 3 3 , 3 7 4 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 7 8 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 20 . 8 0 3 , 3 2 8 . 0 0 9 . 8 0 1 , 5 6 8 . 0 0 2 . 5 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 1. 5 0 4 5 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 . 9 0 5 8 , 2 5 4 . 0 0 1 . 8 0 5 5 , 1 8 8 . 0 0 19 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 T O N 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 20 22 1 1 . 5 0 1 A G G R E G A T E B A S E , C L A S S 7 ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 8 5 5 . 0 0 21 22 3 2 . 5 0 1 M I L L B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T S Y 4 5 . 0 0 22 23 3 1 . 6 0 3 B I T U M I N O U S J O I N T C O N T R O L L F 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 23 23 5 7 . 5 0 2 B I T U M I N O U S M A T E R I A L F O R T A C K C O A T G A L 1 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 24 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 2 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 25 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 9 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( T R A I L ) T O N 2 0 . 0 0 12 . 5 0 1 6 8 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 8 4 1 7 3 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 2 5 2 0 5 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 13 . 5 0 1 1 , 5 4 2 . 5 0 1 2 . 8 4 1 0 , 9 7 8 . 2 0 2 6 . 0 0 2 2 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 10 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 2. 8 5 1 8 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 2 . 5 8 1 6 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 2 . 3 0 1 4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 2. 5 0 3 , 0 6 2 . 5 0 3 . 0 0 3 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 3 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 66 . 0 0 1 5 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 6 1 . 0 0 1 4 4 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 5 9 . 2 5 1 4 0 , 7 1 8 . 7 5 15 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 0 0 1 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 8 4 . 0 0 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 9 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y 26 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E ( D R I V E W A Y ) T O N 1 2 0 . 0 0 27 23 6 0 . 5 0 1 T Y P E S P 1 2 . 5 N O N W E A R I N G C O U R S E M I X T U R E T O N 3 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 28 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 I R R I G A T I O N R E P A I R E A C H 2 0 . 0 0 29 25 3 1 . 5 0 1 C O N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R B 6 1 8 L F 1 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 30 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 4 " C O N C R E T E W A L K S F 1 2 5 . 0 0 31 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 1 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 32 25 3 1 . 5 1 1 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ( S P E C I A L ) ( 6 " T H I C K ) S F 4 0 0 . 0 0 33 25 3 1 . 6 1 8 T R U N C A T E D D O M E S S F 1 2 . 0 0 34 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , P L A S T I C ( R E P L A C E M E N T ) L F 9 0 0 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 13 5 . 0 0 1 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 8 6 . 0 0 1 0 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 1 3 6 . 5 0 1 6 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 66 . 0 0 2 0 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 5 0 1 8 4 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 5 7 . 2 5 1 7 4 , 6 1 2 . 5 0 41 6 . 0 0 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 4 . 0 0 1 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 11 . 5 4 2 0 3 , 1 0 4 . 0 0 9 . 8 5 1 7 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 1 1 . 2 5 1 9 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4. 4 2 5 5 2 . 5 0 5 . 8 0 7 2 5 . 0 0 4 . 3 0 5 3 7 . 5 0 4. 4 7 8 2 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 4 . 8 0 8 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 4 . 4 0 8 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 6. 4 5 2 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 3 . 0 0 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 6 . 3 0 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 31 . 2 0 3 7 4 . 4 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 8 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 5 0 3 6 6 . 0 0 5. 2 0 4 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 35 25 4 0 . 6 1 8 I N S T A L L S A L V A G E D B R I C K P A V E R S S F 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 36 25 6 3 . 6 0 1 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L L S 1 . 0 0 37 25 6 4 . 5 3 1 F & I S I G N P A N E L S F 1 6 0 . 0 0 38 25 6 4 . 6 0 2 F & I S I G N P O S T E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 39 25 7 3 . 5 0 2 S I L T F E N C E T Y P E M A C H I N E S L I C E D L F 7 5 0 . 0 0 40 25 7 3 . 5 2 0 S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L B A C K H O E H R 4 0 . 0 0 41 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 T E M P O R A R Y R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E E A C H 3 . 0 0 42 25 7 3 . 6 0 7 R O A D W A Y R O C K C H E C K D A M C Y 1 0 0 . 0 0 43 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 1 3 0 . 0 0 44 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 S E E D I N G ( T Y P E 2 5 - 1 5 1 ) S Y 2 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 45 25 7 5 . 6 0 7 L A N D S C A P E R O C K C Y 5 0 . 0 0 46 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 5 0 . 0 0 47 SP E C PR O C T O R T E S T EA C H 50 0 10 . 5 0 1 6 , 0 6 5 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 1 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 1 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 37 . 5 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 2 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 5 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 68 . 2 5 1 , 0 2 3 . 7 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 1 , 4 2 5 . 0 0 3. 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 . 9 5 2 , 2 1 2 . 5 0 3 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 14 5 . 6 0 5 , 8 2 4 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 6 . 5 0 1 6 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 78 0 . 0 0 2 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 1 3 . 0 0 6 , 0 3 9 . 0 0 45 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 . 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 9 . 5 0 7 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 48 . 0 0 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 . 5 0 5 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 1. 3 5 2 7 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 2 5 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 . 3 0 2 6 , 3 9 0 . 0 0 68 . 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 12 5 0 0 62 5 0 0 12 5 0 0 625 00 150 00 750 00 47 SP E C PR O C T O R TE S T EA C H 5 .00 48 SP E C G R A D A T I O N T E S T E A C H 5 . 0 0 49 SP E C A I R V O I D S E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 50 SP E C C O N C R E T E T E S T I N G , C Y L I N D E R S ( S E T O F 3 ) E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 51 SP E C E X T R A C T I O N / G R A D A T I O N E A C H 1 6 . 0 0 52 SP E C N U C L E A R B I T U M I N O U S D E N S I T Y E A C H 4 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) - - T O T A L 12 5 .00 62 5 .00 12 5 .00 625 .00 150 .00 750 .00 12 5 . 0 0 6 2 5 . 0 0 9 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 22 5 . 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 25 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 25 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 . 0 0 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 1, 8 7 2 , 8 4 1 . 0 2 1 , 9 8 9 , 3 3 4 . 8 2 2 , 2 7 9 , 2 5 5 . 8 9 10 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M S E W E R 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E S E W E R P I P E ( S T O R M ) L F 8 8 9 . 0 0 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E F E N C E L F 1 6 5 . 0 0 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E E A C H 4 0 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 2 3 S A L V A G E B E N C H E A C H 1 . 0 0 5 21 0 5 . 5 0 1 P O N D E X C A V A T I O N ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) ( C V ) C Y 2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 6 25 0 2 . 6 0 3 6 - I N C H P E R F T P P I P E D R A I N W / S O C K L F 2 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 7 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 2 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 5 0 . 0 0 8 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 5 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 12 . 4 8 1 1 , 0 9 4 . 7 2 1 1 . 5 0 1 0 , 2 2 3 . 5 0 1 3 . 5 0 1 2 , 0 0 1 . 5 0 4. 1 6 6 8 6 . 4 0 1 5 . 0 0 2 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 4 . 8 0 7 9 2 . 0 0 44 2 . 0 0 1 7 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 4 0 4 . 0 0 1 6 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 1 4 9 . 0 0 5 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 20 8 . 0 0 2 0 8 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 1 0 . 5 0 1 1 0 . 5 0 14 . 5 6 3 7 , 1 2 8 . 0 0 1 4 . 8 0 3 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 1 8 . 7 5 4 7 , 8 1 2 . 5 0 6. 2 4 1 2 7 , 6 0 8 . 0 0 9 . 2 5 1 8 9 , 1 6 2 . 5 0 6 . 6 0 1 3 4 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 31 . 2 0 2 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 3 6 . 7 0 3 1 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 6 2 . 0 0 5 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 32 . 2 4 1 0 5 , 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 6 . 5 0 1 1 9 , 6 1 0 . 5 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 3 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 9 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 1 8 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 6 5 . 0 0 10 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 1 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 11 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 4 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 12 25 0 3 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G S T O R M S E W E R E A C H 2 3 . 0 0 13 25 0 3 . 6 0 3 4 " P V C S E R V I C E P I P E S C H 4 0 L F 1 2 0 . 0 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E A D J U S T M E N T E A C H 6 . 0 0 15 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E ( A D J U S T M E N T ) L F 2 4 0 . 0 0 16 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N S P E C 2 4 " X 3 6 " E A C H 2 2 . 0 0 17 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 4 8 - 4 0 2 0 E A C H 3 9 . 0 0 18 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 6 0 - 4 0 2 0 E A C H 1 . 0 0 19 25 0 6 . 5 0 2 C O N S T D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E D E S I G N 4 8 - 4 0 2 0 ( S U M P ) E A C H 5 . 0 0 20 25 0 6 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T S T O R M S T R U C T U R E E A C H 1 . 0 0 21 25 1 1 5 0 1 RA N D O M R I P R A P C L A S S I V CY 13 0 0 0 38 . 4 8 2 , 5 0 1 . 2 0 4 4 . 8 0 2 , 9 1 2 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 3 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 41 . 6 0 3 , 4 1 1 . 2 0 4 8 . 2 0 3 , 9 5 2 . 4 0 6 9 . 0 0 5 , 6 5 8 . 0 0 45 . 7 6 3 , 7 5 2 . 3 2 5 5 . 7 0 4 , 5 6 7 . 4 0 8 1 . 0 0 6 , 6 4 2 . 0 0 1, 7 6 8 . 0 0 4 0 , 6 6 4 . 0 0 4 6 1 . 0 0 1 0 , 6 0 3 . 0 0 6 6 3 . 5 0 1 5 , 2 6 0 . 5 0 13 . 5 2 1 , 6 2 2 . 4 0 4 9 . 6 0 5 , 9 5 2 . 0 0 3 6 . 0 0 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 15 6 . 0 0 9 3 6 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 1 9 . 0 0 7 , 3 1 4 . 0 0 31 . 2 0 7 , 4 8 8 . 0 0 4 4 . 4 0 1 0 , 6 5 6 . 0 0 1 , 2 1 9 . 0 0 2 9 2 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 1, 7 6 8 . 0 0 3 8 , 8 9 6 . 0 0 1 , 9 1 0 . 0 0 4 2 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 2 , 1 9 3 . 0 0 4 8 , 2 4 6 . 0 0 2, 1 0 0 . 8 0 8 1 , 9 3 1 . 2 0 2 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 9 5 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 3, 3 5 9 . 2 0 3 , 3 5 9 . 2 0 3 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 3 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 4 , 3 0 3 . 0 0 4 , 3 0 3 . 0 0 7, 7 6 8 . 8 0 3 8 , 8 4 4 . 0 0 8 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 4 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 1 3 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 1, 0 7 1 . 2 0 1 , 0 7 1 . 2 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 4 4 . 0 0 9 4 4 . 0 0 10 9 2 0 14 1 9 6 0 0 14 4 0 0 18 720 00 69 00 8 970 00 21 25 1 1 .50 1 RA N D O M RI P RA P CL A S S IV CY 13 0 .00 22 25 1 1 . 6 0 7 G R A N U L A R B E D D I N G , R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ( C V ) C Y 8 1 1 . 0 0 23 25 4 0 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L S A L V A G E D B E N C H E A C H 1 . 0 0 24 25 4 0 . 6 0 3 L A N D S C A P E E D G E R , S T E E L ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) L F 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 25 25 4 0 . 6 1 8 R O C K R E T A I N I N G W A L L S F 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 26 25 5 4 . 6 0 2 1 2 " F L A R E D E N D S E C T I O N W / T R A S H G U A R D E A C H 2 . 0 0 27 25 5 7 . 6 0 3 S P L I T R A I L W O O D F E N C E L F 2 9 0 . 0 0 28 25 7 1 . 5 4 1 T R A N S P L A N T T R E E T R E E 4 . 0 0 29 25 7 3 . 5 3 0 I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N ( W I M C O ) E A C H 9 2 . 0 0 30 25 7 3 . 5 3 0 I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N ( S T R U C T U R E W / O C A S T I N G ) E A C H 6 1 . 0 0 31 25 7 3 . 6 0 2 I N L E T S E D I M E N T R E M O V A L E A C H 7 5 . 0 0 32 25 7 5 . 5 1 2 M U L C H M A T E R I A L , T Y P E S P E C I A L C Y 8 0 . 0 0 33 25 7 5 . 5 2 3 E R O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T ( C A T E G O R Y 6 ) S Y 3 5 . 0 0 10 9 .20 14 ,19 6 .00 14 4 .00 18 ,720 .00 69 .00 8 ,970 .00 40 . 0 0 3 2 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 1 9 . 5 8 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 3 8 3 0 . 5 0 2 4 , 7 3 5 . 5 0 41 6 . 0 0 4 1 6 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 4 2 . 0 0 4 4 2 . 0 0 8. 3 2 2 5 , 7 9 2 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 . 9 0 5 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 29 . 0 0 4 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1, 3 1 0 . 4 0 2 , 6 2 0 . 8 0 1 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 5 9 . 0 0 2 , 7 1 8 . 0 0 16 . 6 4 4 , 8 2 5 . 6 0 1 6 . 0 0 4 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 1 5 . 7 5 4 , 5 6 7 . 5 0 41 6 . 0 0 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 83 . 2 0 7 , 6 5 4 . 4 0 5 1 9 . 0 0 4 7 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 3 1 3 . 0 0 2 8 , 7 9 6 . 0 0 83 . 2 0 5 , 0 7 5 . 2 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 2 2 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 3 1 3 . 0 0 1 9 , 0 9 3 . 0 0 14 5 . 6 0 1 0 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 2 3 1 . 0 0 1 7 , 3 2 5 . 0 0 2 0 2 . 5 0 1 5 , 1 8 7 . 5 0 49 . 9 2 3 , 9 9 3 . 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 9 . 5 0 3 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 10 . 4 0 3 6 4 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 2 6 2 . 5 0 7 . 5 0 2 6 2 . 5 0 34 25 7 5 . 5 5 0 C O M P O S T G R A D E 2 C Y 1 6 0 . 0 0 35 SP E C T R A C E W I R E ( D R A I N T I L E ) L F 2 0 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 36 SP E C D R A I N T I L E C O N N E C T I O N S T U B E A C H 2 5 . 0 0 37 SP E C S T E E L F I B E R ( R A I N W A T E R G A R D E N ) T O N S 6 5 . 0 0 38 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 3 0 . 0 0 39 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 52 . 0 0 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 3 2 . 0 0 5 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 5 0 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 0. 3 5 7 , 1 5 7 . 5 0 0 . 7 5 1 5 , 3 3 7 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 3 , 0 6 7 . 5 0 78 . 0 0 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 4 6 1 . 0 0 1 1 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 6 9 8 . 0 0 1 7 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 1, 5 7 5 . 0 0 1 0 2 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 7 . 0 0 8 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 12 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 11 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E A N D R E P L A C E G A T E V A L V E E A C H 5 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E H Y D R A N T E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E V A L V E E A C H 1 9 . 0 0 6 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E W A T E R S E R V I C E ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) E A C H 3 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 82 8 , 4 4 1 . 4 2 9 8 8 , 0 3 6 . 6 8 1 , 1 0 9 , 1 2 8 . 5 0 7, 4 3 6 . 0 0 1 1 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 6 , 5 7 0 . 0 0 9 8 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 9 0 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 5, 1 2 7 . 2 0 5 , 1 2 7 . 2 0 4 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 4 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 3 , 6 5 7 . 0 0 3 , 6 5 7 . 0 0 3, 7 1 2 . 8 0 1 8 , 5 6 4 . 0 0 3 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 7 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 7 5 4 . 0 0 1 3 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 1, 1 6 4 . 8 0 1 7 , 4 7 2 . 0 0 4 6 1 . 0 0 6 , 9 1 5 . 0 0 5 7 9 . 5 0 8 , 6 9 2 . 5 0 1, 0 9 2 . 0 0 2 0 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 2 8 8 . 0 0 5 , 4 7 2 . 0 0 2 9 1 . 0 0 5 , 5 2 9 . 0 0 1, 6 1 2 . 0 0 4 , 8 3 6 . 0 0 6 9 2 . 0 0 2 , 0 7 6 . 0 0 2 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 7 , 7 2 5 . 0 0 7 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N W A T E R M A I N L F 6 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 8 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N S E R V I C E L F 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 9 25 0 3 . 6 0 4 4 " I N S U L A T I O N S Y 4 0 . 0 0 10 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R S E R V I C E L S 1 . 0 0 11 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 12 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G W A T E R M A I N E A C H 1 4 . 0 0 13 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 6 " G A T E V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 15 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 1 2 " B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 4 . 0 0 16 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N E A C H 8 8 . 0 0 17 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E L F 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 18 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 6 " W A T E R M A I N L F 5 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 19 25 0 4 6 0 3 12 " WA T E R M A I N LF 1 2 9 5 0 0 10 . 4 0 6 7 , 6 5 2 . 0 0 4 . 6 0 2 9 , 9 2 3 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 7 8 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 3. 1 2 8 , 5 9 5 . 6 0 2 . 3 0 6 , 3 3 6 . 5 0 1 . 5 0 4 , 1 3 2 . 5 0 45 . 7 6 1 , 8 3 0 . 4 0 6 9 . 2 0 2 , 7 6 8 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 83 , 5 1 2 . 0 0 8 3 , 5 1 2 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 3 3 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 31 2 . 0 0 3 1 2 . 0 0 4 8 9 . 0 0 4 8 9 . 0 0 3 8 6 . 0 0 3 8 6 . 0 0 3, 6 7 1 . 2 0 5 1 , 3 9 6 . 8 0 9 2 3 . 0 0 1 2 , 9 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 0 1 7 , 5 2 8 . 0 0 6, 0 8 4 . 0 0 9 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 6 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 9 3 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 6 , 5 9 7 . 0 0 9 8 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 2, 5 7 9 . 2 0 3 8 , 6 8 8 . 0 0 2 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 3 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 8 1 . 0 0 2 9 , 7 1 5 . 0 0 3, 3 9 0 . 4 0 1 3 , 5 6 1 . 6 0 2 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 7 8 . 0 0 1 2 , 3 1 2 . 0 0 1, 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 9 2 1 . 0 0 8 1 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 19 . 7 6 5 4 , 4 3 8 . 8 0 4 5 . 0 0 1 2 3 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 3 3 . 7 5 9 2 , 9 8 1 . 2 5 37 . 4 4 2 0 1 , 0 5 2 . 8 0 3 2 . 2 0 1 7 2 , 9 1 4 . 0 0 4 1 . 2 5 2 2 1 , 5 1 2 . 5 0 48 8 8 63 2 9 9 6 0 58 0 0 75 110 00 51 25 66 368 75 19 25 0 4 .60 3 12 WA T E R M A I N LF 1 ,29 5 .00 20 SP E C D E N S I T Y T E S T E A C H 3 0 . 0 0 21 SP E C P R O C T O R T E S T E A C H 3 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R 1 21 0 4 . 5 0 1 R E M O V E S E W E R P I P E ( S A N I T A R Y ) L F 1 0 . 0 0 2 25 0 3 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G S A N I T A R Y S E W E R E A C H 2 . 0 0 3 25 0 3 . 6 0 3 8 " P V C S A N I T A R Y S E W E R M A I N L F 1 0 . 0 0 4 25 0 6 . 5 2 2 A D J U S T F R A M E R I N G A N D C A S T I N G E A C H 5 3 . 0 0 5 25 0 6 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T S A N I T A R Y S T R U C T U R E E A C H 1 5 . 0 0 48 .88 63 ,29 9 .60 58 .00 75 ,110 .00 51 .25 66 ,368 .75 13 0 . 0 0 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 13 0 . 0 0 3 9 0 . 0 0 1 2 5 . 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 97 2 , 5 7 6 . 8 0 8 2 6 , 6 2 5 . 5 0 8 7 1 , 3 7 0 . 5 0 13 . 5 2 1 3 5 . 2 0 2 3 . 3 0 2 3 3 . 0 0 5 0 . 7 5 5 0 7 . 5 0 1, 1 1 2 . 8 0 2 , 2 2 5 . 6 0 3 7 5 . 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 3 1 1 . 0 0 6 2 2 . 0 0 79 . 0 4 7 9 0 . 4 0 1 0 4 . 0 0 1 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 2 9 . 7 5 2 9 7 . 5 0 69 6 . 8 0 3 6 , 9 3 0 . 4 0 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 6 8 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 5 4 7 . 5 0 2 9 , 0 1 7 . 5 0 1, 3 8 3 . 2 0 2 0 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 9 2 3 . 0 0 1 3 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 2 0 7 . 5 0 3 , 1 1 2 . 5 0 SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R - - T O T A L 60 , 8 2 9 . 6 0 8 4 , 7 6 8 . 0 0 3 3 , 5 5 7 . 0 0 12 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E 1 25 3 5 . 5 0 1 B I T U M I N O U S C U R B L F 8 5 1 . 0 0 2 25 7 5 . 6 0 4 R E S T O R A T I O N S Y 4 0 0 . 0 0 SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E - - T O T A L AL T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R 1 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 2 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 1 5 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 9. 3 6 7 , 9 6 5 . 3 6 7 . 0 0 5 , 9 5 7 . 0 0 8 . 1 0 6 , 8 9 3 . 1 0 8. 3 2 3 , 3 2 8 . 0 0 7 . 5 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 7 0 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 11 , 2 9 3 . 3 6 8 , 9 5 7 . 0 0 9 , 1 7 3 . 1 0 30 . 1 6 2 5 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 3 8 . 0 0 3 2 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 3 8 . 7 5 3 2 , 9 3 7 . 5 0 32 . 2 4 1 0 5 , 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 8 . 0 0 1 2 4 , 5 2 6 . 0 0 3 0 . 2 5 9 9 , 1 2 9 . 2 5 3 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 1 8 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 6 5 . 0 0 4 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 1 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 5 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 2 4 " H D P E S T O R M S E W E R L F 8 2 . 0 0 6 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 D E D U C T 1 2 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 5 0 . 0 0 7 25 0 3 . 5 1 1 D E D U C T 1 5 " R C P C L V S T O R M S E W E R L F - 3 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 8 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 1 8 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 6 5 . 0 0 9 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 2 1 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 2 . 0 0 10 25 0 3 . 5 4 1 D E D U C T 2 4 " R C P C L I I I S T O R M S E W E R L F - 8 2 . 0 0 A L T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R - - T O T A L AL T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N 1 21 0 4 5 0 9 RE M O V E A N D R E P L A C E H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E EA C H 40 0 35 . 3 6 2 , 2 9 8 . 4 0 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 3 4 . 2 5 2 , 2 2 6 . 2 5 44 . 7 2 3 , 6 6 7 . 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 4 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 7 . 7 5 3 , 9 1 5 . 5 0 44 . 7 2 3 , 6 6 7 . 0 4 5 6 . 0 0 4 , 5 9 2 . 0 0 4 3 . 7 5 3 , 5 8 7 . 5 0 31 . 2 0 - 2 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 3 6 . 7 0 - 3 1 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 5 3 . 0 0 - 4 5 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 32 . 2 4 - 1 0 5 , 6 5 0 . 4 8 3 6 . 5 0 - 1 1 9 , 6 1 0 . 5 0 5 0 . 0 0 - 1 6 3 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 38 . 4 8 - 2 , 5 0 1 . 2 0 4 4 . 8 0 - 2 , 9 1 2 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 - 3 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 41 . 6 0 - 3 , 4 1 1 . 2 0 4 8 . 2 0 - 3 , 9 5 2 . 4 0 6 9 . 0 0 - 5 , 6 5 8 . 0 0 45 . 7 6 - 3 , 7 5 2 . 3 2 5 5 . 7 0 - 4 , 5 6 7 . 4 0 8 1 . 0 0 - 6 , 6 4 2 . 0 0 -9 1 6 . 2 4 6 , 2 0 5 . 7 0 - 8 3 , 0 4 4 . 0 0 7 4 3 6 0 0 29 7 4 4 0 0 6 5 7 0 0 0 26 280 00 6 050 00 24 200 00 1 21 0 4 .50 9 RE M O V E AN D RE P L A C E HY D R A N T AN D VA L V E EA C H -4 .00 2 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E H Y D R A N T E A C H 4 . 0 0 3 21 0 4 . 5 0 9 R E M O V E V A L V E E A C H 1 . 0 0 4 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N W A T E R M A I N L F 2 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 5 21 0 4 . 6 0 3 A B A N D O N S E R V I C E L F 9 5 0 . 0 0 6 25 0 4 . 6 0 1 T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R S E R V I C E L S 1 . 0 0 7 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 A D J U S T V A L V E E A C H - 1 . 0 0 8 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 C O N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G W A T E R M A I N E A C H - 1 0 . 0 0 9 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 I N S T A L L H Y D R A N T A N D V A L V E E A C H 4 . 0 0 10 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 8 " G A T E V A L V E A N D B O X E A C H 1 . 0 0 11 25 0 4 . 6 0 2 W A T E R S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N E A C H 3 4 . 0 0 12 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 " W A T E R S E R V I C E L F 9 5 0 . 0 0 13 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 6 " W A T E R M A I N L F 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 7 ,43 6 .00 -29 ,74 4 .00 6 ,57 0 .00 -26 ,280 .00 6 ,050 .00 -24 ,200 .00 1, 1 6 4 . 8 0 4 , 6 5 9 . 2 0 4 6 1 . 0 0 1 , 8 4 4 . 0 0 4 3 6 . 5 0 1 , 7 4 6 . 0 0 1, 0 9 2 . 0 0 1 , 0 9 2 . 0 0 2 8 8 . 0 0 2 8 8 . 0 0 5 8 2 . 0 0 5 8 2 . 0 0 10 . 4 0 2 4 , 1 2 8 . 0 0 4 . 6 0 1 0 , 6 7 2 . 0 0 1 1 . 7 5 2 7 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 3. 1 2 2 , 9 6 4 . 0 0 2 . 3 0 2 , 1 8 5 . 0 0 1 . 2 0 1 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 28 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 2 6 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 31 2 . 0 0 - 3 1 2 . 0 0 4 8 9 . 0 0 - 4 8 9 . 0 0 1 0 3 . 8 7 - 1 0 3 . 8 7 3, 6 7 1 . 2 0 - 3 6 , 7 1 2 . 0 0 9 2 3 . 0 0 - 9 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 5 1 . 5 5 - 1 2 , 5 1 5 . 5 0 6, 0 8 4 . 0 0 2 4 , 3 3 6 . 0 0 6 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 2 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 6 , 5 9 7 . 0 0 2 6 , 3 8 8 . 0 0 3, 5 3 6 . 0 0 3 , 5 3 6 . 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 4 3 6 . 0 0 2 , 4 3 6 . 0 0 1, 3 0 0 . 0 0 4 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 3 8 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 8 3 8 . 5 0 2 8 , 5 0 9 . 0 0 19 . 7 6 1 8 , 7 7 2 . 0 0 4 5 . 0 0 4 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 7 5 2 5 , 4 1 2 . 5 0 37 . 4 4 7 1 , 8 8 4 . 8 0 3 2 . 2 0 6 1 , 8 2 4 . 0 0 4 1 . 2 5 7 9 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 14 25 0 4 . 6 0 3 1 2 " W A T E R M A I N L F 4 0 0 . 0 0 A L T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L 48 . 8 8 1 9 , 5 5 2 . 0 0 5 8 . 0 0 2 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 . 2 5 2 0 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 17 6 , 9 5 6 . 0 0 1 8 5 , 0 4 4 . 0 0 2 0 3 , 2 2 9 . 1 3 13 IT E M S P E C . I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N NO . R E F . UN I T T O T A L QT Y BI D S U M M A R Y - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 1 . 0 - S T R E E T ( G R A N T / N O B L E ) - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 2 . 0 - S T R E E T ( V E N U S / C R Y S T A L ) - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 3 . 0 - S T O R M - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 4 . 0 - W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 5 . 0 - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R - - T O T A L SC H E D U L E 6 . 0 - A S B U R Y A V E N U E - - T O T A L T. A . S C H I F S K Y & S O N S , I N C . R E D S T O N E C O N S T . M E Y E R C O N T R A C T I N G , I N C . UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E ($ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) ( $ ) 83 6 , 5 2 6 . 3 5 8 8 3 , 8 9 0 . 5 9 9 0 0 , 8 6 1 . 9 4 1, 8 7 2 , 8 4 1 . 0 2 1 , 9 8 9 , 3 3 4 . 8 2 2 , 2 7 9 , 2 5 5 . 8 9 82 8 , 4 4 1 . 4 2 9 8 8 , 0 3 6 . 6 8 1 , 1 0 9 , 1 2 8 . 5 0 97 2 , 5 7 6 . 8 0 8 2 6 , 6 2 5 . 5 0 8 7 1 , 3 7 0 . 5 0 60 , 8 2 9 . 6 0 8 4 , 7 6 8 . 0 0 3 3 , 5 5 7 . 0 0 11 , 2 9 3 . 3 6 8 , 9 5 7 . 0 0 9 , 1 7 3 . 1 0 TO T A L B A S E B I D A L T E R N A T E 1 . 0 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R - - T O T A L A L T E R N A T E 2 . 0 - A D D I T I O N A L W A T E R M A I N - - T O T A L TO T A L B A S E B I D W I T H A L T E R N A T E S IN D I C A T E S N U M B E R S C O R R E C T E D F R O M B I D A S S U B M I T T E D : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S I S A N A C C U R A T E T A B U L A T I O N O F T H E B I D S RE C E I V E D F O R T H E A B O V E M E N T I O N E D P R O J E C T . NA M E : K r i s t i n a E l f e r i n g P E 4, 5 8 2 , 5 0 8 . 5 5 4 , 7 8 1 , 6 1 2 . 5 9 5 , 2 0 3 , 3 4 6 . 9 3 -9 1 6 . 2 4 6 , 2 0 5 . 7 0 - 8 3 , 0 4 4 . 0 0 17 6 , 9 5 6 . 0 0 1 8 5 , 0 4 4 . 0 0 2 0 3 , 2 2 9 . 1 3 4, 7 5 8 , 5 4 8 . 3 1 4 , 9 7 2 , 8 6 2 . 2 9 5 , 3 2 3 , 5 3 2 . 0 6 NA M E : Kr i s t i n a El f e r i n g , P .E . DA T E : M a r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 MN R E G . N O . : 4 2 3 5 0 14 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-015 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – VENUS/CRYSTAL NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, a bid has been let for the City of Arden Hills 2015 Pavement Management Program – Venus/Crystal Neighborhood: And the contract price for such improvement is $2,773,727.89 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $945,675.78 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $3,719,403.67. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $2,608,162.84 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $1,111,240.83. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2016, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.30 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a cop y of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-016 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE DATE FOR ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR THE 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – VENUS/CRYSTAL NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the council on March 30, 2015, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the City of Arden 2015 Pavement Management Program – Venus/Crystal Neighborhood: WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held at 7:00 p.m. on the 27th day of April, 2015, in the City Hall at 1245 West Highway 96, to pass upon such proposed assessment. All persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parce l described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. An owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the County the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-017 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – GRANT/NOBLE/LAKE LANE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, a bid has been let for the City of Arden Hills 2015 Pavement Management Program – Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood: And the contract price for such improvement is $1,113,137.49 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $379,988.87 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $1,493,126.36. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $1,042,517.69 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $450,608.67. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2016, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.30 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-018 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE DATE FOR ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR THE 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – GRANT/NOBLE/LAKE LANE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the council on March 30, 2015, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the City of Arden 2015 Pavement Management Program – Grant/Noble/Lake Lane Neighborhood: WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held at 7:00 p.m. on the 4th day of May, 2015, in the City Hall at 1245 West Highway 96, to pass upon such proposed assessment. All persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. An owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the County the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Amy Dietl, City Clerk