HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-27-15-R 'It-
�-ARZEN HILLS
Approved: June 8, 2015
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 27,2015
7:00 P.M. -ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City
Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave
McClung, and Robert Woodburn
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Patrick Klaers; Director of Finance and Administrative
Services Sue Iverson; Public Works Director Terry Maurer; Assistant City Engineer John
Anderson; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; City Planner Ryan Streff;
Associate Planner Matthew Bachler; Finance Analyst Dave Perrault; and City Clerk Amy
Dietl
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
None.
3. STAFF COMMENTS
A. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP)Update
Community Development Director Hutmacher reported that the City Council continues to meet
in work sessions to discuss the draft TCAAP Redevelopment Plan (TRC). The Council hoped to
preliminarily approve this document by the end of May.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 2
B. Transportation Update
Public Works Director Maurer reported that the County Road E bridge was removed a week
ago. Snelling Avenue was down to one lane in each direction and would remain this way for the
next four weeks to allow the contractor to work on the center support structure. He indicated that
the ramp work would be completed in 14 days. It was noted that the bridge was scheduled to be
open by August 14th.
Public Works Director Maurer explained that staff attended a preconstruction meeting with the
County for the County Road E project. He commented that work would begin on this project on
May 11`h after the ramps reopen. He stated that the contractor would be handing out notices to
local businesses prior to work beginning. It was anticipated that the work would be completed in
late July.
Public Works Director Maurer indicated that MnDOT rejected all of the bids for the County
Road F bridge over I-35W. There was a problem with the bid documents and MnDOT
administration would be rebidding the project on June 5`h. MnDOT was confident that the bridge
could still be completed in 2015.
Public Works Director Maurer stated that the Highway 96/1-35W interchange project has been
bid and awarded to Ames Construction. A preconstruction meeting will be held with the
contractor in the coming week. He would report back to the Council with additional information
after this meeting.
Public Works Director Maurer reported that the Round Lake Road contractor mobilized last
week and has been working. The contractor planned to pour curbs this week with paving
completed next week. He anticipated that the project would be completed by early June.
Councilmember McClung questioned when the Highway 96/1-35W interchange would be
completed.
Public Works Director Maurer stated that it was the intent of the County to have this
interchange open by the end of the 2015 construction season.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. February 24, 2015, Special City Council Work Session
B. March 16, 2015, City Council Work Session
C. March 30, 2015, Special City Council Work Session
MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to approve the February 24, 2015, special City Council work session
minutes, the March 16, 2015, City Council work session minutes; and the
March 30, 2015, special City Council work session minutes as presented. The
motion carried unanimously (5-0).
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 3
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item- Claims and Payroll
B. Motion to Approve Planning Case 15-007 —Text Amendments
C. Motion to Approve Planning Case 15-006 — Site Plan Review and CUP —Big Ten
Bar and Grill
D. Motion to Accept Proclamation for National Police Week 2015
MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize
execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
6. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
None.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Venus-Crystal PMP Assessment Hearing
Assistant City Engineer Anderson stated that on February 23, 2015, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 2015-013 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement
for Bids. Bids were solicited during March and opened on Thursday March 19, 2015.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson indicated that a portion of the costs for the 2015 PMP project
are proposed to be assessed against the benefitting properties according to the City's Assessment
Policy. In order to assess these costs, the City must follow the process outlined in State Statute
429. On March 30, 2015, after the bids were opened, the City Council adopted Resolution 2015-
015 Declaring the Amount of the Cost to be Assessed and set today as the date for the assessment
hearing. A public hearing prior to adopting the assessments is a requirement of the State Statute
429.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson explained that the project is proposed to be assessed
consistent with the City's Assessment Policy and past practices, which states that 50% of the costs
for roadway improvements will be assessed in residential areas, with the remaining portion
financed by City funds. Financing for the project is consistent with City policy and past practices.
The project costs include engineering and overhead costs as outlined in the Assessment Policy.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson reported that the Assessment Policy states that the City
Council shall retain the right to review each project on its own merit and deviate from any portion
of the policy as it deems proper. As was discussed at the public hearing held on January 12, 2015,
there are six properties currently in this proposed assessment that were previously assessed for
street projects in 1995 and 1998. The 1995 project dealt with the reconstruction of County Road F
(Lake Valentine Road) and it affected two properties. The following list provides the address and
amount of the 1995 assessment:
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 4
1. 3988 Glenview Road $4,527.32
2. 1691 Crystal Avenue $5,158.30
Assistant City Engineer Anderson stated that the 1998 project reconstructed Fairview Avenue
from Lake Valentine Road to Gramsie Road. It affected four properties in the current assessment
project. The following list provides the property address and the amount of the 1998 assessment:
1. 1759 Crystal Avenue $3,598.20
2. 1758 Crystal Avenue $3,998.00
3. 1761 Gramsie Road $3,998.00
4. 1777 Gramsie Road $3,998.00
Assistant City Engineer Anderson indicated that these six properties are in the current
assessment roll. There were a number of comments about these lots at the public hearing. The
minutes from the January 12, 2015, public hearing are included in the agenda packet as is an
exhibit showing these properties. The Council is being asked by staff to give direction on these six
properties. They could be left in the project at full assessment amounts, they could be removed
from the project and not assessed, or they could be left in the project but given some or full credit
for the previous assessment paid. When the Council considers adoption of the resolution adopting
the assessment roll, staff will need direction on how to deal with these six properties. If their
assessment amount is changed by the Council they will be sent a letter documenting the change.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson commented that as provided for in State Statute, no appeal
may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner is filed with the City at or prior to the assessment hearing. After the
adoption of the assessment roll, property owners who have submitted an objection in writing have
30 days to serve notice of an appeal to the City, and within 10 days after serving notice to file with
the District Court.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson recommended that the Council hold the assessment hearing
first. Staff is prepared to make a presentation with a full discussion of the unique parcels
discussed previously in this memo. After the assessment hearing is closed, Council should
consider adopting Resolution 2015-028 Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 2015 Pavement
Management Program-Venus/Crystal Neighborhood with any changes they deem appropriate.
Following the May 4th assessment hearing for the Grant/Noble/Lake Lane portion of the project,
staff will be recommending award of the contract to Valley Paving as the lowest responsible
bidder.
Mayor Grant questioned how the 2004 assessment policy states future assessments shall occur
after 10 years.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson reported that the 2004 policy recommends that a 10-year
period be selected for reconstruction projects. He did not believe that the 2004 policy exempted a
homeowner from paying another assessment after 10 years.
Councilmember Holden asked the life expectancy of a residential roadway.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 5
Assistant City Engineer Anderson anticipated that the proposed roadways would last 40 to 50
years with proper maintenance.
Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson reported that he received one written objection to the
proposed project and assessment. The written objection was received from Ed Werner, 1758
Crystal Avenue.
This information was provided to the Council.
Bertil Erickson, 1678 Glenview Court, asked when a detailed construction schedule would be
available.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson indicated that a newsletter would be sent to the neighborhood
later this week or early next week.
Leslie Croswell, 1622 Glenview Court, questioned if the City would be replacing the curbs in his
cul-de-sac when the plows wreck it.
Public Works Director Maurer did not anticipate that this would be a concern. He commented
that if any damage to the concrete curb were to occur over time from snow plows, the areas would
be repaired by the City.
Debbie Dondlinger, 1761 Gramsie Road, explained that she was appealing the assessment being
charged to her property. She explained that her property was assessed in 1997 for work completed
on Fairview Avenue. She felt that it was unfair that her corner property was not being offered any
relief. She thanked the Council for considering her concerns.
Britt Lundgren, 1777 Gramsie Road, commented that she was appealing her assessment.
Ed Werner, 1758 Crystal Avenue, reported that he submitted a written objection to his
assessment. He opposed the $8,614.27 assessment as he was previously assessed for the Fairview
Avenue project in 1998. He indicated that some residents were previously assessed for the
Fairview Avenue project. He understood that the assessment policy was amended in 2004 which
impacted how corner lots would be assessed. He respectfully requested that the Council not
reassess the four properties that were assessed under the Fairview Avenue project.
George Rehbein, 1759 Crystal Avenue, agreed with Mr. Werner and opposed paying the full
assessment for the 2015 street reconstruction project. He stated that he has lived in his home
since 1978.
Mayor Grant recommended that those individuals appealing their assessment submit their
objection in writing to staff.
Miriam Ward, 3964 Fairview Avenue North, congratulated the Council for selecting the
Venus/Crystal neighborhood for reconstruction as the roadways are in need of repair. She stated
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCII.—APRIL 27, 2015 6
that she has lived in Arden Hills since 1993. She commented that she was speaking as a neighbor
this evening, on behalf of her six neighbors that would be double assessed. She encouraged the
Council to reconsider the assessments and not reassess the homes that were included in the
previous projects.
Jerry Ciresi, 1831 Venus Avenue, read an email the he previously sent to the Councilmembers
for the record. He expressed his concerns with the proposed assessment and how it would impact
him and his wife, as they are retired and living on a fixed income. He noted that he spoke with the
Finance Department about making a special consideration for seniors and was told that his income
would have to be less than $26,000 a year. He commented that he and his wife were concerned
about how the assessment would impact them financially. He stated that after living in the City
for 38 years, he may have to move out of his home. He understood that the project was needed,
but he also understood that not all residents could afford the assessment.
Debbie Dondlinger, 1761 Gramsie Road, commented that she was on disability after having
Stage 4 cancer.
William Gillies, 1736 Crystal Avenue, asked if the sanitary sewer lines would be televised.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson indicated that staff televised the main lines in 2014.
Donald Young, 1621 Glenview Court, encouraged the Finance Department to be fair and not
have the corner lots pay two assessments. In addition, he asked that the interest rate be
reconsidered. He recommended that the City properly maintain these new roadways.
William Dalrymple, 3901 Dellview Avenue, questioned why the project had a 30% overhead
expense. He inquired why his neighborhood assessments were higher than in the other
neighborhood.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson commented that these fees assisted the City with drafting
plans and specifications, while also covering City Attorney and consultant fees. He then
explained why the assessment fees differed between the two neighborhoods.
Mr. Dalrymple asked if private driveways could be completed in conjunction with the street
improvement project.
Assistant City Engineer Anderson stated that it was his understanding that the contractor was
not interested in completing this work. He recommended that if homeowners were interested in
replacing their driveway that this work be completed after the new driveway aprons were in place.
Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m.
Mayor Grant questioned how the Council wanted to approach the assessments for the six homes
that were assessed on the previous projects.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 7
Councilmember Holmes stated that she believed that the proper procedure going forward would
be to allow the six homes to receive a credit for the previous assessment amounts paid in order to
equalize the change in the assessment policy. It was her opinion this was the fairest option.
Councilmember Holden reiterated that the previous assessment policy required corner lots to pay
100% for both streets. This has since been amended to require corner lots to only be assessed for
the roadway of their address.
Councilmember McClung commented that he appreciated Councilmember Holmes sentiments.
However, he was in favor of exempting the six properties from the 2015 street reconstruction
project assessments.
Mayor Grant believed that logical arguments could be made from both sides of this issue. He
stated that it has been quite some time since these properties were previously assessed, but he
supported the six properties being pulled from the assessment roll.
Councilmember Woodburn supported Councilmember Holmes suggestion and that a credit
should be given to the six homeowners for their previous assessment payment.
Councilmember Holden stated that she could support Councilmember Holmes on this matter.
MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Woodburn seconded a
motion to Adopt Resolution #2015-028, Adopting Assessment Roll for the
2015 Pavement Management Program-Venus/Crystal Neighborhood,
crediting the six properties from the previous proiects dollar for dollar for
their previous assessments.
Mayor Grant was in favor of increasing the assessment period beyond 10 years.
Councilmember Holmes reviewed the assessment policy stating that the time limit is 10 years.
Councilmember McClung stated that he would be supportive of a 12-year assessment time
period.
Councilmember Holden did not approve of the term "fixed income" as she believed everyone
was living on a fixed income these days.
AMENDMENT: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holden
seconded a motion increase the assessment time period from 10 -years
to 12 years.
Councilmember Woodburn did not believe that a two-year extension would change the payment
rates that drastically.
The amendment carried 4-1 (Woodburn opposed).
Mayor Grant questioned if the Council wanted to adjust the senior hardship income levels.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 8
Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson explained that the income limits were
set by State Statute. She reviewed the statute with the Council.
The amended motion carried (5-0).
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Budget Parameters
Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson stated that City staff was beginning
the process of developing a Preliminary 2016 Budget. She indicated that staff needs general
direction and guidance from the Council with regard to the budget for the coming year. She noted
that as of this time, the City is not under levy limits for 2016. She requested feedback from the
Council as staff begins to prepare the 2016 budget.
Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the City's use of interns. She stated that the
engineering intern should be done at the end of 2015. She questioned if staff would be able to
meet the budget deadlines with City Administrator Klaers adjusting his hours this summer.
Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson explained that staff had built extra
time into the schedule for that purpose.
Mayor Grant agreed that he did not want to see interns in the 2016 budget.
Councilmember McClung asked if the Council had any concerns with the fire budget that he
should be bringing to the Fire Board prior to addressing the 2016 budget.
Councilmember Holden stated that she did not believe that the Fire Relief needed another
increase in 2016. She questioned when the department would be 24/7.
Councilmember McClung anticipated that this would occur in 2016.
Councilmember Holden did not believe there was a full-time need for a technological person for
the fire department.
Mayor Grant discussed the percentage of the budget that was necessary for police and fire
coverage on an annual basis. He encouraged the City to keep a tight control over increased
expenditures in these areas.
MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
approve the Budget Calendar as presented by staff. The motion carried (5-
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2015 9
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Holmes discussed the great job Ramsey County did in serving the public and
thanked all police officers in honor of National Police Week.
Councilmember Holden reported that the Personnel Committee has been meeting and recently
received documentation from Springsted regarding the pay study. This document would be
reviewed by the Personnel Committee on Wednesday night.
Councilmember Holden requested an update from staff in the future on the Wellness Funds,
where they came from and what they are used for.
Mayor Grant discussed several procedural concerns he had. These included the process by which
Councilmembers may request to add items for discussion to the agenda, as well as, reminding the
Council to allow staff to complete their staff presentations before interrupting with questions.
City Administrator Klaers commented that there would be active shooter police training taking
place at the Army Reserve Center at Lexington Avenue and Highway 96 on Friday, May 1St
ADJOURN
MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
adjourn. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mayor Grant adjourned the regular City Council meeting at 8:46 p.
Amy Dietl David Grant
City Clerk Mayor