HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-16-16-WSAGENDA ITEMS
Strategic Planning Discussion For CTV North Suburbs
Barbara Raye (Executive Director of the Center for Policy, Planning and
Performance - serving as facilitator for CTV North Suburbs)
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Organized Collection
Ryan Streff, City Planner
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
Ryan Streff, City Planner
MEMO.PDF
Exterior Lighting Design Standards
Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Questions For Metropolitan Council Member Marie McCarthy
Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director
MEMO.PDF
State Of The City
Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT.PDF
2015 PMP Restoration Update
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF
State Fair Parking
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Arden View Court Storm Sewer Repair
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Lakeshore Place Landscaping Project With Ramsey County
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF,
ATTACHMENT F.PDF
Johanna Marsh Tennis Court
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Trail Priorities
Jonathan Wicklund, Councilmember
MEMO.PDF
Personnel Committee Discussion
Su Iverson, Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance
and Administrative Services
MEMO.PDF
ADJOURN
Mayor:
David Grant
Councilmembers:
Brenda Holden
Fran Holmes
Dave McClung
Jonathan Wicklund
City Council
Work Session
Agenda
May 16, 2016
5:00 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651 -792 -7800
Website :
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
CALL TO ORDER
1.
1.A.
Documents:
1.B.
Documents:
1.C.
Documents:
1.D.
Documents:
1.E.
Documents:
1.F.
Documents:
1.G.
Documents:
1.H.
Documents:
1.I.
Documents:
1.J.
Documents:
1.K.
Documents:
1.L.
Documents:
1.M.
Documents:
AGENDA ITEMSStrategic Planning Discussion For CTV North SuburbsBarbara Raye (Executive Director of the Center for Policy, Planning and Performance - serving as facilitator for CTV North Suburbs) MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDFOrganized CollectionRyan Streff, City Planner MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF2040 Comprehensive Plan UpdateRyan Streff, City Planner MEMO.PDFExterior Lighting Design StandardsMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF, ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDFQuestions For Metropolitan Council Member Marie McCarthyJill Hutmacher, Community Development Director MEMO.PDF
State Of The City
Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT.PDF
2015 PMP Restoration Update
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF
State Fair Parking
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Arden View Court Storm Sewer Repair
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Lakeshore Place Landscaping Project With Ramsey County
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF, ATTACHMENT D.PDF, ATTACHMENT E.PDF,
ATTACHMENT F.PDF
Johanna Marsh Tennis Court
John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF, ATTACHMENT A.PDF, ATTACHMENT B.PDF,
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Trail Priorities
Jonathan Wicklund, Councilmember
MEMO.PDF
Personnel Committee Discussion
Su Iverson, Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance
and Administrative Services
MEMO.PDF
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungJonathan Wicklund City Council Work Session AgendaMay 16, 2016 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents:1.C.Documents:1.D.Documents:1.E.Documents:
1.F.
Documents:
1.G.
Documents:
1.H.
Documents:
1.I.
Documents:
1.J.
Documents:
1.K.
Documents:
1.L.
Documents:
1.M.
Documents:
AGENDA ITEM – 1A
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sue Iverson, Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance and Admin Services
SUBJECT: Strategic Planning Discussion for CTV North Suburbs
Background/Discussion
As part of its strategic planning process, the Board of Directors of CTV North Suburbs is looking at
the services it provides. CTV North Suburbs also wants to ensure that, over the next few years, it is
meeting the needs of its constituents as effectively and efficiently as possible.
Barbara Raye, Executive Director of the Center for Policy, Planning and Performance, serves as the
facilitator for CTV North Suburbs. She will be at the meeting to provide information on the video
programming and technical services provided to the city and to the residents of Arden Hills. CTV
North Suburbs is also seeking input from the councils of the other member cities, from the three
school boards and from the community organizations and agencies that CTV works with.
Included in the packet is material about North Suburban Communications Commission and CTV
North Suburbs, their sources of funding, and information on their primary services –
programming/video production and training. Also included are key findings from the two
telephone surveys that were conducted on behalf of CTV North Suburbs last year. (A list of
programs produced last year and the complete survey reports are also attached for those who want
more detail.) In addition, a short video showing some of CTV North Suburbs activity for 2015 may
be viewed at: https://vimeo.com/160386675.
Please think about the following questions while reviewing the informational material provided:
1. Do you have any general questions about CTV that are not addressed in the materials?
2. Of the services that CTV provides for local government, i.e., the city, which do you think are the
most valuable?
3. What additional services or programs could CTV offer that would enhance civic engagement and
transparency in local government?
4. Of the services that CTV provides for the community, which do you think are the most valuable?
5. What additional services or programs could CTV offer to improve the sense of community or
enhance the skills/knowledge that residents gain through our educational and community
programming?
6. What services and/or programs should CTV no longer provide?
7. What changes would you like to see in the next three to four years?
Attachments
Attachment A: Strategic Planning – Background Material
AGENDA ITEM – 1B
City of Arden Hills
TCAAP Organized Collection
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-010 - Organized Collection on TCAAP_RCC\Memos_Reports_16-010
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Sue Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner
SUBJECT: TCAAP Organized Collection
Background
At the March 21, 2016, Work Session, the City Council directed staff to begin researching the
necessary steps in order to pursue an organized solid waste collection system for TCAAP. The
City Council was clear that the City would not be implementing organized collection for the
remainder of Arden Hills south of Highway 96. The Minnesota Statute 115A.94, which outlines
the requirements for cities pursuing organized collection, has been included as Attachment A for
your review.
Discussion
While the Minnesota Organized Collection Statute (M.S. 115A.94) outlines five basic steps for
planning and implementing an organized collection system, other cities that have considered this
process have utilized a variety of different tools in order to arrive at their final decision. Cities
engaged in this process spend a significant amount of time conducting research; gathering data
from the public; hosting hauler meetings; preparing meeting minutes, agendas and meeting
schedules; and organizing public engagement to determine the best approach to organized
collection for their City. In addition, because of the complexities associated with hauler contract
negotiations, drafting any Request for Proposals (RFP) and final contract, coordinating the
Organized Collection Options Committee (OCOC), and evaluating proposals, many cities have
found it necessary to engage a consultant along with their City Attorney to assist in the process.
The five basic steps for implementing organized collection are listed below:
1. Notice to public and to licensed haulers
2. 60-day negotiation period with licensed haulers
3. Organized Collection Options Committee (OCOC)
MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM – 1B
City of Arden Hills
TCAAP Organized Collection
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-010 - Organized Collection on TCAAP_RCC\Memos_Reports_16-010
4. Public notice and public hearing
5. Approval of contract and implementation
While the list of basic steps mentioned above may seem fairly straightforward, each step has
multiple sub-steps that may require separate actions by the Council. For example, the City will
need to provide a notice to the licensed haulers in Arden Hills that outlines the vision of the
Council, and establishes the City’s priorities and goals to be referenced during the negotiation
period. If the negotiation period with the haulers does not result in a suitable agreement, the City
would then be required to create the OCOC. During this process the Council would be asked to
provide direction on the composition, schedule, and scope of this committee. The OCOC would
then hold a series of meetings that are open to the public to determine the best proposal to bring
forward to the Council for consideration.
To the best of our knowledge, no other open trash hauling municipality in the State has used the
Minnesota Organized Collection Statute (M.S. 115A.94) as the planning process for a new
residential/commercial development project such as TCAAP. The Minnesota Organized
Collection Statute has been used by other cities to organize residential solid waste where open
collection services previously existed.
Budgeting for Organized Collection
Staff has conducted initial research on the cost to contract professional services to assist in the
organized collection process depending on the scope and level of consultant effort requested. If
a full consultant services scope is required for all five organized collection steps itemized above,
these professional services could range from $100,000 to $220,000 on the high end of the range.
The City Attorney has stated that the cost associated with legal review could range from $5,000
to $10,000. Other variables that would affect the cost of consultant services include:
• The length of the negotiation period
• Efficiency of hauler negotiations
• Creation and execution of a final collection contract
• Formation of the OCOC (if needed)
• Development of an RFP for collection services (if needed)
• Drafting a Code amendment for solid waste collection services on TCAAP
• Creation and execution of an implementation plan
• Organized collection for commercial establishments
Hours Budget Cost
City Staff 310 – 710 (4-10 hours per week) $14,000 – $32,000
City Attorney -- $5,000 – $10,000*
Consultant 600 – 1,400 $100,000 – $220,000**
Total Cost $119,000 – $262,000
* Excludes the cost of litigation.
**These are only preliminary hours and cost figures for the full process under the Minnesota Organized Collection
Statute (M.S. 115A.94) based on a scenario that involves a high level of consultant effort.
AGENDA ITEM – 1B
City of Arden Hills
TCAAP Organized Collection
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-010 - Organized Collection on TCAAP_RCC\Memos_Reports_16-010
Tasks & Timeline
Based on the research staff conducted, the City can expect the process under the Minnesota
Organized Collection Statute for TCAAP to take anywhere from 9 months to 2 years to
complete, again depending on the length of the negotiation period and the possible formation of
the OCOC. The preliminary timeline estimate has been provided below; however, a more
refined timeline would be created once the extent of the City’s process is more defined.
Task Approximate Timeline
Preparation for Refuse Hauler Negotiations June – October, 2016
Hauler Negotiations December, 2016 – April, 2017
Develop Organized Collection Options Committee (if needed) March – August, 2017
Implementation May, 2017 – March, 2018
Discussion Questions
1) Staff is unaware of any other communities that have pursued organized collection for
commercial establishments and multi-family dwellings units under the Minnesota
Organized Collection Statute (M.S. 115A.94). Knowing that other communities have not
pursued these components, does the Council want commercial establishments and multi-
family dwellings units to be included in the scope for organized collection on TCAAP?
2) Should staff continue to work with the City Attorney and potential consultants to identify
cost saving measures?
3) Should staff begin the preparation of a scope of work and RFP for organized collection
consulting services?
Attachments
A. MN Statute 115A.94 – Organized Collection
B. Work Session Minutes – March 21, 2016
115A.94 ORGANIZED COLLECTION.
§
Subdivision 1.Definition.
"Organized collection" means a system for collecting solid waste in which a specified collector, or a
member of an organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area
or areas some or all of the solid waste that is released by generators for collection.
§
Subd. 2.Local authority.
A city or town may organize collection, after public notification and hearing as required in
subdivisions 4a to 4d. A county may organize collection as provided in subdivision 5. A city or town that
has organized collection as of May 1, 2013, is exempt from subdivisions 4a to 4d.
§
Subd. 3.General provisions.
(a) The local government unit may organize collection as a municipal service or by ordinance,
franchise, license, negotiated or bidded contract, or other means, using one or more collectors or an
organization of collectors.
(b) The local government unit may not establish or administer organized collection in a manner
that impairs the preservation and development of recycling and markets for recyclable materials. The
local government unit shall exempt recyclable materials from organized collection upon a showing by
the generator or collector that the materials are or will be separated from mixed municipal solid waste
by the generator, separately collected, and delivered for reuse in their original form or for use in a
manufacturing process.
(c) The local government unit shall invite and employ the assistance of interested persons,
including persons licensed to operate solid waste collection services in the local government unit, in
developing plans and proposals for organized collection and in establishing the organized collection
system.
(d) Organized collection accomplished by contract or as a municipal service may include a
requirement that all or any portion of the solid waste, except (1) recyclable materials and (2) materials
that are processed at a resource recovery facility at the capacity in operation at the time that the
requirement is imposed, be delivered to a waste facility identified by the local government unit. In a
district or county where a resource recovery facility has been designated by ordinance under section
115A.86, organized collection must conform to the requirements of the designation ordinance.
§
Subd. 4.
[Repealed, 2013 c 45 s 7]
§
Subd. 4a.Committee establishment.
(a) Before implementing an ordinance, franchise, license, contract, or other means of organizing
collection, a city or town, by resolution of the governing body, must establish an organized collection
options committee to identify, examine, and evaluate various methods of organized collection. The
governing body shall appoint the committee members.
(b) The organized collection options committee is subject to chapter 13D.
§
Subd. 4b.Committee duties.
The committee established under subdivision 4a shall:
(1) determine which methods of organized collection to examine, which must include:
(i) a system in which a single collector collects solid waste from all sections of a city or town; and
(ii) a system in which multiple collectors, either singly or as members of an organization of
collectors, collect solid waste from different sections of a city or town;
(2) establish a list of criteria on which the organized collection methods selected for examination
will be evaluated, which may include: costs to residential subscribers, miles driven by collection vehicles
on city streets and alleys, initial and operating costs to the city of implementing the organized collection
system, providing incentives for waste reduction, impacts on solid waste collectors, and other physical,
economic, fiscal, social, environmental, and aesthetic impacts;
(3) collect information regarding the operation and efficacy of existing methods of organized
collection in other cities and towns;
(4) seek input from, at a minimum:
(i) the governing body of the city or town;
(ii) the local official of the city or town responsible for solid waste issues;
(iii) persons currently licensed to operate solid waste collection and recycling services in the city or
town; and
(iv) residents of the city or town who currently pay for residential solid waste collection services;
and
(5) issue a report on the committee's research, findings, and any recommendations to the
governing body of the city or town.
§
Subd. 4c.Governing body; implementation.
The governing body of the city or town shall consider the report and recommendations of the
organized collection options committee. The governing body must provide public notice and hold at
least one public hearing before deciding whether to implement organized collection. Organized
collection may begin no sooner than six months after the effective date of the decision of the governing
body of the city or town to implement organized collection.
§
Subd. 4d.Participating collectors proposal requirement.
Prior to establishing a committee under subdivision 4a to consider organizing residential solid
waste collection, a city or town with more than one licensed collector must notify the public and all
licensed collectors in the community. The city or town must provide a 60-day period in which meetings
and negotiations shall occur exclusively between licensed collectors and the city or town to develop a
proposal in which interested licensed collectors, as members of an organization of collectors, collect
solid waste from designated sections of the city or town. The proposal shall include identified city or
town priorities, including issues related to zone creation, traffic, safety, environmental performance,
service provided, and price, and shall reflect existing haulers maintaining their respective market share
of business as determined by each hauler's average customer count during the six months prior to the
commencement of the 60-day negotiation period. If an existing hauler opts to be excluded from the
proposal, the city may allocate their customers proportionally based on market share to the
participating collectors who choose to negotiate. The initial organized collection agreement executed
under this subdivision must be for a period of three to seven years. Upon execution of an agreement
between the participating licensed collectors and city or town, the city or town shall establish organized
collection through appropriate local controls and is not required to fulfill the requirements of
subdivisions 4a, 4b, and 4c, except that the governing body must provide the public notification and
hearing required under subdivision 4c.
§
Subd. 5.County organized collection.
(a) A county may by ordinance require cities and towns within the county to organize collection.
Organized collection ordinances of counties may:
(1) require cities and towns to require the separation and separate collection of recyclable
materials;
(2) specify the material to be separated; and
(3) require cities and towns to meet any performance standards for source separation that are
contained in the county solid waste plan.
(b) A county may itself organize collection under subdivisions 4a to 4d in any city or town that does
not comply with a county organized collection ordinance adopted under this subdivision, and the county
may implement, as part of its organized collection, the source separation program and performance
standards required by its organized collection ordinance.
Approved: April 11, 2016
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
JOINT MEETING WITH PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE (PTRC)
MARCH 21, 2016
5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council work
session at 5:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave
McClung and Jonathan Wicklund
Also present: Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance and Administrative Services
Sue Iverson; Community Development Director Jill Hutmacher; Acting Public Works
Director John Anderson; City Planner Ryan Streff; Senior Planner Matthew Bachler;
Recreation Coordinator Sara Grant; Recreation Programmer Aaron Thelen; and Deputy
Clerk Julie Hanson
Others present: PTRC Chair Rich Straumann and PTRC Committee Members Steve
Scott, John Van Valkenburg, Chuck Michaelson, Josh Bloyer and Keri Bloyer
1. AGENDA ITEMS
E. Process and Parameters for Organized Collection on TCAAP
City Attorney Joel Jamnik referenced the 2013 amended State Statute 115A.94 regarding
potential organized collection in the TCAAP area. He said that any city that had more than one
licensed collector, such as Arden Hills, must notify the public and all licensed collectors in the
community. While State statute defined the minimum notification period as 60 days, most cities
typically allowed between 120 and 180 days.
City Attorney Jamnik stated that while the creation of organized collection in TCAAP would
involve a completely new service area versus an existing service area, the statute did not
differentiate between the two as far as the procedure that must be followed. He stated this would
be a lengthy, time consuming process and would require a substantial amount of City staff time to
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 21, 2016 2
coordinate public meetings, prepare minutes, and report back to the licensees and members of the
community.
City Attorney Jamnik indicated that all licensed haulers in the city must be invited to solicit
input regarding the process. He noted typically these were not comfortable meetings and could be
highly competitive.
City Attorney Jamnik also stated prior to implementation of organized collection, one possibility
was that members of the community would form an organized collection taskforce to oversee the
process and recommend a viable proposal to the City. If the recommendation was for one, single
trash hauler, an RFP would be required followed by review of the proposals, negotiations and
finalization of a contract. He stated this process could take the rest of 2016 if an aggressive
schedule was followed.
Mayor Grant asked if City Attorney Jamnik was aware of another city that had formed organized
collection for an area that was undeveloped.
City Attorney Jamnik stated he was not aware of such and that typically cities have integrated
organized collection into their existing system.
Mayor Grant stated he wanted to be clear that the existing service in Arden Hills, including
Arden Manor, was not changing and that the proposal for organized collection solely pertained to
future development of the TCAAP redevelopment area.
Councilmember Holden asked how newly reconstructed roads were affected by the weight of
repetitive traffic as a result of multiple trash haulers.
Acting Public Works Director Anderson stated that every trip over a road by a truck creates
cumulative damage on a road.
City Attorney Jamnik cautioned that the City should not prejudge the outcome in this process.
He suggested allowing the licensed haulers to submit suggestions about how best to organize
collection and the City would then review the proposals. He noted there can be one, single hauler
for the entire area or a consortium of haulers, each with their own designated area and day.
The Council was in agreement that organized collection would be limited to the TCAAP
development area.
Councilmembers Holden and Wicklund asked about staff time and typical costs associated with
the process.
City Attorney Jamnik stated that he would provide information to the Council in the future
regarding staff time and costs but noted legal fees could be estimated at approximately $5,000 for
ordinance and contract drafting, but City staff time was hard to estimate because it was not known
how many meetings the process would entail or what the waiting period agreed upon would be.
Councilmember Holden asked if the licensed haulers could provide their current rates.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 21, 2016 3
Mayor Grant said this information is on the City’s website.
Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that because some residents are willing to
negotiate their rate, there is no “typical” residence to base rate estimates on.
Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson agreed
and stated that garbage haulers are reluctant to provide rates to the City to post on its website as
they want residents to call to negotiate a rate.
City Attorney Jamnik stated the next step would be to notify the City’s licensees that the
Council is interested in proceeding with organized collection in the TCAAP redevelopment area.
Community Development Director Hutmacher requested the Council’s assistance in
prioritizing their work load as in addition to pursuing organized collection for the TCAAP
redevelopment area, they would be implementing the approved 2016 Planning Commission Work
Plan as well as the Business Retention and Expansion Program.
Mayor Grant requested City staff formulate a plan and report back to the Council in a couple of
weeks.
AGENDA ITEM – 1C
City of Arden Hills
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan
Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Sue Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Streff, City Planner
SUBJECT: 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Action
Consider directing staff to draft an RFP for professional services to assist the City with the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. The City Council will be asked to approve the release of the RFP at a
future meeting.
Background
All cities in the seven county metropolitan area are required by the Metropolitan Land Planning
Act to update their comprehensive plan every ten years to ensure consistency with the
Metropolitan Council’s regional development plan. The current plan is Thrive MSP 2040 and
was adopted in May 2014. Local comprehensive plans must also conform to the metropolitan
system plans for transportation, water resources, housing, and regional parks and trails. The last
Comprehensive Plan update was completed in 2008 and approved by the City Council and the
Metropolitan Council in 2009. Although the next update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan is not
due until December of 2018, staff will begin working on the update in 2016, in order to prepare
for the Metropolitan Council submittal deadline. The Metropolitan Council and State Statutes
require the Comprehensive Plan to address land use, transportation, water resources, parks &
trails, housing, resilience, economic competitiveness, and implementation.
The comprehensive planning process is an opportunity for the City to review the goals, policies,
and strategies from the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; evaluate the progress the City has made;
determine what policies should continue; and address new issues and concerns. This process is
not meant to solve every problem in the City or prescribe a specific strategy for every issue;
however, it will help the City set and prioritize policies and projects as well as inform the overall
AGENDA ITEM – 1C
City of Arden Hills
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan
Page 2 of 3
long-term decision-making process for the City. The planning process for this update will
involve public meetings, workshops, and the review of all plan components, which will require
involvement from the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Timeline
The majority of the work on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will need to be completed by April of
2018, in order to provide a six month review period by adjacent and affected jurisdictions before
the December 2018 submittal deadline. Staff has provided a general draft timeline that outlines
the work to be completed in each of the following years.
• 2016
o Define scope of work for professional services
o Consider and approve professional services contract
o Define and implement the public engagement strategy
o Organize, define, and prepare data
o Review the City’s vision
• 2017
o Develop draft Comprehensive Plan
o Determine implementation strategies
• 2018
o Seek approvals and finalize the Plan
o Adjacent governmental review
o Submit to the Metropolitan Council
Budgeting for the Plan
The 2040 Comprehensive Planning process is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2016, with
work continuing through 2018. City staff will be very involved with all aspects of the 2018
update and will draft many of the Plan’s components. However, consultant services will still be
required for the more technical components of the Plan such as protected resources,
transportation, resiliency, and infrastructure planning.
City staff has completed preliminary research on the cost to contract professional services to
assist in the Comprehensive Plan update and has found that these services could range from
$80,000 - $150,000, depending on the defined scope of services and the elements of the Plan that
can be completed in-house. The work is expected to include updates to specific technical plan
elements, helping plan and implement a public engagement strategy, and providing general
project management services to ensure the update is completed on schedule and complies with
Metropolitan Council requirements. At this time, the City is not eligible for grant funding for
planning assistance through the Metropolitan Council and staff is not aware of any other funding
sources for 2016. The City has budgeted $20,000 for professional services in the Community
AGENDA ITEM – 1C
City of Arden Hills
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan
Page 3 of 3
Development Department budget for 2016. Staff is expecting the majority of the additional
consultant costs needed to complete the update to be paid out during 2017.
For the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update, the City approved two consultant contracts to assist
with the planning process. The City contracted with HKGi for professional planning services to
prepare most of the components within the Plan. For transportation related components, the City
contracted with Bolton & Menk. Between the two contracts, the City spent approximately
$55,000 for the services provided. However, the City did receive two grants that totaled
$44,193.80 to help offset these costs. The City received an Active Community Living Grant
from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota in the amount of $24,193.80 to incorporate active
living principals into the Plan. A grant from the Metropolitan Council was also received in the
amount of $20,000 for planning assistance.
Next Steps
Staff is recommending the following next steps for work on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan:
1. Staff reviews the Metropolitan Council submittal requirements and prepares a scope of
work for professional services. Staff expects consultant services to include at a minimum
the following:
a) Updates to specific technical plan elements
b) Community engagement planning and implementation
c) General project management services
2. Staff drafts RFP based on the defined scope of work.
3. City Council approves resolution to release RFP.
4. Staff reviews submittals and prepares a summary memo for City Council consideration.
5. City Council selects a consultant and awards the contract.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for May 16, 2016
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-012 - Zoning Code Amendment - Exterior Lighting
Regulations\Memos_16-012
Page 1 of 2
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Sue Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case #16-012: Exterior Lighting Design Standards
Requested Action
Review the draft amendment to Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code regarding exterior
lighting design standards and provide staff with further direction on how the City Council would
like to proceed with this Code amendment.
Background
The 2016 Planning Commission Work Plan was discussed and adopted at the City Council Work
Session on January 19, 2016. One of the items on the Work Plan was to research and amend the
exterior lighting design standards included in the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission and
staff previously completed work on this item in 2014, which included researching exterior
lighting ordinances adopted by other cities in the metro and identifying best practices, and
discussing possible updates to the Zoning Code. Staff has gone back and reviewed this work and
drafted an Amendment to Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code (Attachment A).
Sections 1320 and 1325 of the Zoning Code include additional requirements on exterior lighting
for specific districts. For example, the Special Requirements for the Neighborhood Business
District in Section 1320.08 restricts security and parking lot lights to no more than 14 feet in
height. Excerpts from these sections of the Zoning Code have been included in Attachment B.
Properties would be required to meet the general design standards for exterior lighting in Section
1325.05, Subd. 3 as well as any additional standards included elsewhere in the Zoning Code.
Discussion
The Planning Commission’s discussion on exterior lighting in 2014 focused on requirements that
would limit light trespass across property lines, reduce glare, and restrict high-luminosity light
fixtures. The draft amendment would achieve these goals through prescriptive standards on
AGENDA ITEM – 1D
MEMORANDUM
_________________________________________________________________________________________
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for May 16, 2016
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-012 - Zoning Code Amendment - Exterior Lighting
Regulations\Memos_16-012
Page 2 of 2
light ing design and mounting height. A lighting plan would be required for any new
development, redevelopment, or addition for a commercial, industrial, or multi-family use, which
would allow the City to evaluate conformance with the design standards.
Based on direction previously provided by the City Council, staff has included language in the
amendment that prohibit s architectural accent lighting used to advertise buildings or properties.
This would include LED illuminated accent lighting increasingly seen on gas station canopies
and fast food restaurant buildings. Lighting of architectural features would only be permitted
where the intent is to provide accent or interest, or to help identify building entrances.
Next Steps
Based on the feedback provided by the City Council, staff will complete revisions to the draft
amendment to Section 1325.05, Subd. 3. The Planning Commission will be required to hold a
public hearing on the proposed amendment prior to formal action by the City Council on this
item.
Attachments
A. Draft Amendment to Section 1325.05, Subd. 3, red-lined version
B. Excerpts from Section 1320 and 1325.05 of the Zoning Code
C. Planning Commission Minutes, June 4, 2014
D. Planning Commission Minutes, July 9, 2014
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 - Zoning Code
Section 1325 – General Regulations
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 1 of 3
Chapter 13 – Zoning Code
Section 1325 - General Regulations
1325.05 Design Standards.
Subd. 3 Exterior Lighting.
A. Lighting Plan. Submittal of a lighting plan shall be required to ensure
compliance with this section for all new development, redevelopme nt, and
additions other than single-family and two-family dwelling units. The
lighting plan shall include the following:
1. A site plan showing the location of property lines, buildings,
parking areas, pedestrian walkways, and all proposed outdoor light
fixtures;
2. Proposed height of each outdoor light fixture;
3. Description of each outdoor light fixture including but not limited
to photometric data, IESNA shielding designation, glare control
package, and type of light source;
4. A photometric plan overlaid o n the site plan showing foot candle
readings on a grid of ten (10) feet by ten (10) feet or less. Each point
must be to the nearest one-tenth (0.1) foot candle.
B. Luminaire design.
1. For the lighting of parking lots, pedestrian walkways, and other
primarily horizontal surfaces, luminaires shall be aimed straight down
and shall meet full cut -off design criteria. Unshielded ornamental light
fixtures may be approved by the City Council if undesirable off-site
impacts from direct or reflected views of the light source can be
addressed through design or arrangement.
2. For the lighting of building walls, landscaping, and other primarily
vertical surfaces, luminaires shall be located and shielded so as not to
project their beam onto adjoining properties, past the object being
illuminated, skyward, or onto a public street. Lighting of architectural
features shall be designed with the intent of providing accent and
interest or to help identify entrances.
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1325 – General Regulations
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 2 of 3
3. No light fixture shall produce glare clearly visible beyond a
property line or that creates a sensation within a visual field that causes
annoyance, discomfort, or impairment.
C. Light Spill. Light fixtures shall be arranged to limit light spill onto
adjacent properties and public streets. Cast light shall not exceed four-
tenths (0.4) footcandles on adjoining residential property or one (1.0)
footcandle on adjoining commercial or industrial property, as measured at
the property line. The City Council may make an exception to this
requirement in cases where adjoining properties are within a planned
development that uses a common parking lot, pedestrian walkways, or
other similar facilit ies. In cases where a lot line is adjacent to a public
street, cast light shall not exceed one (1.0) footcandle as measured at the
st reet centerline.
D. Maximum illuminance levels. Outdoor lighting shall not exceed the
maximum maintained illuminance levels as recommended by the
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA).
E. Maximum height. Light poles or mounted lights shall not exceed a
height of thirty-five (35) feet. For properties that abut a single-family or
two-family residential property, light poles or mounted lights shall not
exceed a height of twenty (20) feet when within fifty (50) feet of the
shared property line.
F. Prohibited lighting. The following types of exterior lighting shall be
not be permitted:
1. Architectural accent lighting used on building façades, service
station canopies, monument signs, or other similar structures to exhibit
or advertise buildings or their lots.
2. Blinking, flashing, moving, revolving, flickering, and changing
intensity or color.
G. Exceptions. The lighting standards in this se ction shall not apply to the
following types of exterior lighting:
1. Temporary lighting. Temporary lighting for sporting events and
civic events.
2. Holiday decorations. Outdoor light fixtures used for holiday
decorations.
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1325 – General Regulations
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 3 of 3
3. Flagpoles. Illumination of the national or state flag is permitted
with no more than two (2) upward aimed fully shielded spotlight
fixtures.
4. Right-of-way lighting. Public lighting located within and intended
for the right -of-way.
5. Public safety lighting. Temporary lighting for police, fire, or public
safety construction and repair personnel.
6. Required lighting. Any lighting required and regulated by the
Federal Aviation Administration or other federal, state, or local
agency.
A. Direction. In all districts lighting shall be so arranged as to direct light
away from adjoining lots and public streets. Direct or sky -reflected glare,
from floodlights or high temperature processes such as combustion or
welding, shall not be directed at any adjoining lots or public streets.
B. Concealment or Hooding of Source. The source of illuminate shall be
hooded, concealed or controlled in a manner so as to direct the lighting
pattern only on the site to which the lighting is intended.
C. Intensity. Any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that
exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of
adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential
property.
A. Exterior Lighting of Building Facade. For non -residential uses, visible
from residentially zoned property, a maximum of twenty-five (25) percent
of the facade visible from such residential property may be illuminated by
direct lighting from spot lights or flood lights.
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1320 – District Provisions
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 1 of 2
Chapter 13 – Zoning Code
Section 1320 – District Provisions
1320.08 Special Requirements for the Neighborhood Business (NB) District. (revised 4/28/08)
Subd. 5 Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development. Accomplishing the
stated purpose of the NB District requires particular concern for the design of buildings,
site features (such as landscaping, lighting, and signage) and site design. The
arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall be responsive to existing
buildings, site features and site design on adjoining sites in the district.
G. Lighting shall adhere to the requirements in Section 1325.05 Subd 3.
Lighting shall not be permitted to wash the building, except for accent lighting
to delineate the main entryway into the building. Security and parking lot
lighting shall be on pedestals not to exceed fourteen (14) feet in height.
1320.10 Special Requirements for the B-4 Retail Center District. (revised 12/17/08 )
Subd. 6 Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development. Accomplishing the
stated purpose of the B-4 District requires particular concern for the design of buildings,
site features (such as landscaping, lighting and signage) and site design. The
arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall be responsive to existing
buildings. The City Council will make the final determination on the compatibility and
consistency with this provision.
D. Lighting (GB District regulations, Section 1320.13,) shall apply)
1320.11 Special Requirements for the Civic Center (CC) District. (revised 4/28/08)
Subd. 4 Development Standards.
J. Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the safety and
convenience of occupants and visitors.
1. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows location, type of
illumination and design.
2. Exterior lighting shall be consistent in type, design, and scale to
create unity in the CC District.
3. The source of illumination shall be hooded, concealed or controlled in
a manner so as not to be visible from adjoining lots, streets or highways
or residential areas south of Highway 96.
4. Light washing of buildings is prohibited. Wall packs are allowed at
entrances only. Accent lighting of buildings and sites may be permitted by
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1320 – District Provisions
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 2 of 2
the City. A photometric analysis of site and building shall be submitted for
City approval.
1320.12 Special Requirements for the Gateway Business (GB) District. (revised 4/28/08)
Subd. 6 Development Standards.
H. Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the safety and convenience
of occupants and visitors.
1. The source of illumination shall be hooded, concealed or controlled in
a manner so as not to be visible from adjoining lots, streets or highways
or residential areas east and south of Round Lake.
2. Accent lighting of buildings and sites may be permitted by the City.
3. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows location, type of
illumination and design.
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 - Zoning Code
Section 1325 – General Regulations
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 1 of 2
Chapter 13 – Zoning Code
Section 1325 - General Regulations
1325.05 Design Standards. The standards established in this section are designed to
encourage a high standard of development by providing assurances that neighboring land uses
and neighboring properties will be compatible. The standards shall also apply to all future
development and shall apply to existing development where so stated. Before any applications
for development or construction under the City Code are approved, it shall be determined that
the proposal will be in conformance with these standards unless a deviation has been granted.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate such conformance. (revised 4/28/08)
Subd. 3 Lighting.
A. Direction. In all districts lighting shall be so arranged as to direct light
away from adjoining lots and public streets. Direct or sky-reflected glare,
from floodlights or high temperature processes such as combustion or
welding, shall not be directed at any adjoining lots or public streets.
B. Concealment or Hooding of Source. The source of illuminate shall be
hooded, concealed or controlled in a manner so as to direct the lighting
pattern only on the site to which the lighting is intended.
C. Intensity. Any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that
exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of
adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential
property.
D. Exterior Lighting of Building Facade. For non-residential uses, visible
from residentially zoned property, a maximum of twenty-five (25) percent
of the facade visible from such residential property may be illuminated by
direct lighting from spot lights or flood lights.
Subd. 8 Additional Design Standards for New Development, Redevelopment, and
Modifications to Existing Sites in the B2 and B3 Districts. (revised 12/17/08) Unless
preempted by the standards in this section, all other zoning provisions shall apply:
O. Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the safety and
convenience of occupants and visitors.
1. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows location, type of
illumination and design. A photometric analysis of site and building
shall be submitted for City approval with all new construction or
redevelopment projects.
2. Exterior lighting shall be consistent in type, design, scale, and
color to create unity in the Districts. High-pressure sodium lighting
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1325 – General Regulations
Adopted: November 13, 2006
Page 2 of 2
and other similar types of lighting color may be required by the City to
promote a unified lighting color throughout the Districts. Other lighting
colors may be considered during the City review process.
3. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be
excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes.
4. Lighting under a gasoline station canopy shall not be directly
visible from the street but shall be recessed into the canopy or
otherwise shielded.
5. Light washing of buildings and accent lighting may be permitted
through the City review process provided that it does not negatively
impact residential areas or traffic safety and is complementary to the
district as a whole.
Approved: July 9, 2014
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014
6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
PLANNING CASES
B. Planning Case 14-019; Zoning Code Amendment – Lighting Regulations – Not a Public
Hearing
Associate Planner Bachler stated that the 2014 Planning Commission Work Plan was discussed
and adopted at the March 17, 2014, City Council Work Session. One of the items on the plan
concerns light -emitting diode (LED) lighting. Compared to incandescent lighting, LED lights
produce a greater amount of luminosity, or brightness. The City Council asked staff to review the
City’s existing regulations on lighting and to update relevant ordinances if necessary to address
the potential impacts associated with brighter LED lights. This memo provides an overview of the
sections in the Zoning Code that regulate lighting and also discusses ideas for additional
regulations that could be considered. Based on the direction provided by the Planning
Commission, staff will draft an ordinance that would amend the Zoning Code to update the City’s
lighting regulations.
Associate Planner Bachler indicated that provisions on lighting are generally confined to Section
1325.05 Design Standards in the Zoning Code. Lighting is required to be directed away from
adjacent lots and streets and the source of illumination must be controlled in such a way that light
is only directed onto the site. The Zoning Code restricts light trespass by stipulating that light cast
onto adjacent travel lanes or roadways cannot exceed 1.0 foot candle and 0.4 foot candles on
adjoining residential properties. No more than 25 percent of non-residential façades that are
visible from residential properties can be illuminated by direct light from a source such as a flood
light.
Associate Planner Bachler indicated that Section 1320 District Regulations includes special
requirements for specific districts in the City. The Neighborhood Business, B-4 Retail Center,
Gateway Business, and Civic Center Districts all have special requirements regarding lighting that
go beyond the provisions in Section 1325.05:
• In the Neighborhood Business District, accent lighting is only permitted when used
to delineate the main entrance into a building. Parking lot lighting is restricted to a
maximum of 14 feet in height.
• In the B-4 Retail Center District, the source of illumination must be concealed so
as not to be visible from adjoining lots and streets. Accent lighting of buildings and
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 4, 2014 2
sites may be permitted by the City. A lighting plan including the location, type, and
design of light fixtures is required when development that involves new
construction, redevelopment, or significant modification to an existing building is
proposed.
• In the Gateway Business District, the source of illumination must be concealed so
as not to be visible from adjoining lots and streets, or residential areas east and
south of Round Lake. Accent lighting of buildings and sites may be permitted by
the City. A lighting plan including the location, type, and design of light fixtures is
required when development that involves new construction, redevelopment, or
significant modification to an existing building is proposed.
• In the Civic Center District, exterior lighting is required to be consistent in type,
design, and scale to create unity in the district. The source of illumination must be
concealed so as not to be visible from adjoining lots and streets, or residential
areas south of Highway 96. Light washing of buildings is prohibited and wall packs
are only allowed at building entrances. Accent lighting of buildings and sites may
be permitted by the City. A photometric plan and a lighting plan including the
location, type, and design of light fixtures is required when development that
involves new construction, redevelopment, or significant modification to an
existing building is proposed.
Associate Planner Bachler reported that the Additional Design Standards for the B-2 and B-3
Districts (Section 1325.05 Subdivision 8) also include lighting standards that only apply to
building or site elements being developed or altered. For example, the lighting standards could
come into effect if the remodeling of a parking lot was proposed. A lighting plan including the
location, type, and design of light fixtures is r equired in all cases, and a photometric analysis is
needed for new construction or redevelopment. Consistency in lighting in terms of type, design,
scale, and color is required to create unity in the district, and the City may require certain types of
lighting color. Excessive lighting is not permitted for any building or parking lot lighting. For
gasoline stations, canopy lighting must be recessed so as not to be visible from the street. Light
washing and accent lighting may only be allowed if it does not negatively impact residential areas
or traffic safety.
Staff has begun to research how other cities regulate lighting in their communities and has come
across four general approaches to addressing the impact of exterior lighting on adjoining
properties. These approaches are not mutually exclusive and can be used in combination with one
another:
1. Limit the total overall amount of light that can be used on a site
• This is typically addressed by setting an allowance for the total initial luminaire lumens
allowed using a Parking Space Method (# of lumens per parking stall) or a Hardscape
Area Method (# of lumens per square foot).
• In order to determine compliance, a lighting plan would be required that includes the
lumen output for each light fixture on the site.
2. Limit the maximum lumen level for individual exterior light fixtures
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 4, 2014 3
• This can be addressed by setting a maximum allowable lumen rating for backlighting,
uplighting, and glare for each light fixture. Communities that have taken this approach
have set their standards based on recommendations made by the Illuminating
Engineering Society of North America (IESNA).
• In order to determine compliance, a lighting plan would be required that includes the
specific ratings for backlighting, uplighting, and glare of each light fixture.
3. Limit light trespass from a property onto abutting properties
• This can be addressed by setting a maximum footcandle level at or near the property
line. Typically, specific maximum levels are set for resident ial properties,
commercial/industrial properties, and public streets.
• In order to determine compliance, a photometric analysis would be required that
includes footcandle readings for the entire property area.
4. Limit light pollution, such as glare or sky glow, as viewed from abutting properties and
public streets
• This is addressed with prescriptive requirements on how light fixtures are designed.
For example, lighting for a parking lot may be required to be “full cut -off style”, which
describes a fully hooded light fixture that directs light straight down, or an accent light
may need to be fully shielded to direct light only at the object being illuminated and not
beam onto adjacent properties or skyward.
• Cities that have adopted this type of requirement also prohibit light fixtures that
produce glare that is clearly visible beyond a property line or that creates a sensation
within the visual field that causes impairment or discomfort.
Associate Planner Bachler explained that other common regulations in municipal lighting
ordinances include height limit restrictions and the prohibition of certain types of lights. Height
restrictions apply to both parking lot light poles and exterior lighting mounted to a building wall.
Some cities set a lower height limit for lights within a certain number of feet of a property line to
help reduce light trespass. Currently, Arden Hills only has an established height limit for lighting in
the Neighborhood Business District. Common types of lights that are prohibited by other cities
include lights that blink, flicker, flash, and change in intensity or color. There are no specific limits
on the types of lights allowed in the Zoning Code.
Associate Planner Bachler stated that in order to get a better sense on how the Planning
Commission would like to proceed in the review and revision of the City’s lighting regulations,
staff is requesting feedback on the following questions:
1. Of the four different approaches used by other cities to regulate the impact of exterior
lights on adjoining properties, which approaches would best address the City’s concerns
about LED lights?
2. How should the City balance the need to create stricter lighting regulations with the need
to ensure that property owners can easily interpret and implement these requirements?
3. Should the City consider setting a height limit for exterior lights?
4. Should the City consider establishing a list of prohibited types of exterior lighting?
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 4, 2014 4
Associate Planner Bachler requested the Commission provide further direction on how the
Zoning Code could be updated to improve the City’s regulations regarding exterior lighting.
Chair Larson opened the floor to Commissioner comments.
Chair Larson favored an approach that would create regulations to limit light trespass.
Commissioner Holewa supported regulations that would limit light trespass as well as setting
prescriptive requirements on the design and arrangement of light fixtures to limit light pollution.
Commissioner Bartel agreed with this recommendation.
Commissioner Jones discussed the Holiday gas station sign and stated glare was a concern for
him in residential neighborhoods.
Commissioner Thompson also supported the approach to regulate the lumen level of individual
light fixtures.
Associate Planner Bachler discussed the Ordinances adopted by the cities of Bloomington and
St. Louis Park regarding exterior lighting, noting that additional research could be conducted on
neighboring communities.
Commissioner Holewa commented that up lighting would have to be allowed on Americ an flags
in the overnight hours, as this was a federal regulation.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the City has investigated how neighboring cities address
lighting regulations. He anticipated that each zoning district would have to have specific lighting
regulations.
Discussion ensued regarding lighting regulations for different zoning districts.
Chair Larson believed the City should set a reasonable limit for the height of light fixtures.
Commissioner Thompson agreed. She questioned if the City could restrict fixture heights on
MnDOT and County roads.
Associate Planner Bachler stated he would investigate this further.
Chair Larson believed it would be difficult for the City to prohibit certain types of exterior
lighting. He explained that lighting was creative and was an ever changing market.
Commissioner Bartel indicated language addressing temporary Christmas lights that may blink
or flash could be included in the lighting regulations.
Commissioner Holewa recommended the City encourage the use of LED lights because of the
energy efficiencies associated with this type of lighting.
Associate Planner Bachler thanked the Commission for their input.
Approved: September 3, 2014
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, JULY 9, 2014
6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
B. Planning Case 14-019; Zoning Code Amendment – Lighting Regulations – Not a
Public Hearing
Associate Planner Bachler stated that at the meeting on June 4, 2014, the Planning Commission
reviewed the City’s regulations on exterior lighting and discussed several areas where revisions
could be made. Specifically, the discussion focused on how best to address the higher levels of
luminosity associated with LED lights. Staff has since begun working on a draft of Ordinance
2014-006 that would update the exterior lighting requirements in Section 1325.05 of the Zoning
Code. Section 1320 also includes detailed requirements on exterior lighting for specific districts
within the City. With the proposed revisions to Section 1325.05, some of the district -specific
regulations will become duplicative. The final draft of Ordinance 2014-006 will include updates to
Section 1320 to ensure consistency on lighting standards throughout the Zoning Code.
Associate Planner Bachler explained that the Commissioners were generally in agreement that
the regulations should be written to limit light trespass and establish prescriptive design
requirements to reduce light pollution. Additionally, it was recommended that a maximum lumen
level be set to limit the intensity of individual light fixtures. The Commissioners also discussed
having height limits for exterior lights, with more r estrictive requirements for lights within a
certain distance of adjoining properties.
Associate Planner Bachler reported that the applicability of the lighting regulations was
discussed as well. In order to evaluate compliance with many of the standards, a detailed lighting
plan would be required. The Planning Commission concluded that only commercial, industrial,
and multi-family properties should have to submit these plans. However, residential properties
would still be required to follow the established standards. Finally, staff was instructed to look
into whether certain types of lighting, such as holiday lights and illumination of flagpoles, should
be exempted from these regulations.
Lighting Plan
Associate Planner Bachler stated that the first section of Ordinance 2014-006 addresses in what
situations the City would require a lighting plan and the details that would need to be included in
these plans. Staff believes that an appropriate time to require a lighting plan would be when a new
development, redevelopment, or addition is proposed for a commercial, industrial, or multi-family
property. For these types of projects, a Site Plan Review is typically required to be reviewed by
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 9, 2014 2
the Planning Commission and City Council, and the lighting plan could be evaluated concurrently.
A lighting plan would need to show the location of each light fixture, provide details on the type
of light, and include a grid of photometric readings for the entire site.
Luminaire Design
Associate Planner Bachler commented that the Ordinance would prescribe specific design
requirements for lighting based on whether a horizontal surface (parking lots and sidewalks) or a
vertical surface (building walls and landscaping) is being illuminated. All downward cast lighting
would be required to meet full cut-off design criteria, which means the luminaire must be fully
shielded with no light being cast above a horizontal plane extending out from the light source.
Staff is recommending that an exception be included allowing for non-shielded ornamental light
fixtures when it can be shown that through design or arrangement such lights will not create
undesirable impacts off-site. Many developments, in particular retail and multi-family, use
ornamental lights to provide lighting for storefr onts and pedestrian areas. These features can
contribute to the overall quality of a site design and should be permitted when appropriate.
Associate Planner Bachler indicated that for upward cast lighting, fixtures are required to be
fully shielded. Light fixtures must be arranged so that light is cast only on the area intended to be
illuminated and does not shine past a building, onto an adjoining property, or skyward. A final
provision in this section would prohibit any light fixture that produces glare. The Model Lighting
Ordinance developed by the Illuminating Engineering Society and the International Dark-Sky
Associate defines glare as, “lighting entering the eye directly from luminaires or indirectly from
reflective surfaces that causes visual discomfort or reduced visibility.”
Light Trespass
Associate Planner Bachler explained that the existing lighting regulations address light trespass
onto residential properties and public roadways. These requirements would be maintained in
Ordinance 2014-006 and light trespass limits would be added for commercial and industrial
properties. To evaluate whether light trespass will occur, a photometric analysis showing
footcandle readings across a site is needed. A “footcandle” is a unit of measure that quantifies the
amount of light received on a surface. The maximum footcandle reading at the property line
would be 0.4 footcandles if the abutting property is residential, and 1.0 footcandle if the property
is commercial or industrial. When a property abuts a public street, the maximum measurement
would also be 1.0 footcandle, but the reading would be taken at the street centerline.
Illumination
Associate Planner Bachler noted that the Ordinance would set a maximum lumen level for
individual light fixtures. The pu rpose of this would be to restrict high-luminosity lights, which are
more likely to create a public nuisance. A lumen is a unit measurement for the amount of light
produced by a lamp. It contrasts with a watt, which is a measure of energy consumption. The limit
would be set at 50,000 lumens for commercial and industrial properties and 30,000 lumens for
residential properties. The standards included in the draft were taken from the exterior lighting
ordinance adopted by the City of Bloomington, which went into effect in 2008. Before finalizing
Ordinance 2014-006, staff would like to complete additional research on appropriate maximum
lumen levels to ensure that these requirements conform with industry standards and are not overly
restrictive.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 9, 2014 3
Height Limits
Associate Planner Bachler stated that a recommended maximum height limit of 35 feet is
included in Ordinance 2014-006. This requirement would apply to light poles as well as light
fixtures mounted to the exterior of a building. For properties abutting residential uses, within 50
feet of the property line light fixtures could be no more than 20 feet in height in order to reduce
light trespass and glare. A similar provision is not included for when an abutting property is
industrial or commercial. These uses often have shared or adjoining parking facilities and a more
restrictive height limit within 50 feet of the property line may result in less efficient use of lighting
for parking areas.
Exceptions
Associate Planner Bachler reported that certain types of lights would be excluded from the
City’s exterior lighting standards due to their temporary nature or the City not having regulatory
authority. Specific types of temporary lights that would not need to conform to these standards
include exterior holiday lighting displays and lighting for sporting events. Federal and state
agencies are often required to use certain types of lighting for public safety purposes, and these
lights would also be exempted. A final exception is for the illumination of the natio nal or state
flag. When the national flag is kept up at night, federal law requires that it be illuminated.
Associate Planner Bachler requested that the Commission review the draft Ordinance and
provide staff with feedback on how to proceed.
Chair Larson opened the floor to Commissioner comments.
Chair Larson questioned if up-lighting on flags could be limited in commercial areas, as car
dealerships often have numerous flags.
Associate Planner Bachler indicated that this would be difficult to regulate as there were federal
mandates that require the national flag to be illuminated if displayed at night.
Commissioner Holewa asked if the City had the equipment to measure foot candles and
questioned where the measurements were taken.
Associate Planner Bachler stated that the City did not have the capability to take these
measurements. He reported that measurements were taken at the surface of the ground.
Discussion ensured regarding the blue LED lighting used on the existing Holiday gas station
monument sign.
Chair Larson provided comment on ornamental lighting and asked if the globes provided any
“shielding”.
Associate Planner Bachler reported that partial shielding would likely be provided as the globes
were clouded over, which reduced the intensity of the light source. He stated typically the lumen
levels of ornamental lights were significantly less than lights used to illuminate surface parking
lots.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 9, 2014 4
Commissioner Zimmerman questioned whether from an architectural design standpoint if
architects design to City lighting standards, or to their own development standards.
Chair Larson discussed how architects design lighting plans w ith the assistance of engineers and
in conformance with City standards.
AGENDA ITEM – 1E
Page 1 of 1
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Sue Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Upcoming Discussion with Metropolitan Council Member McCarthy
Requested Action
Compile questions for an upcoming discussion with Metropolitan Council Member Marie
McCarthy.
Discussion
Metropolitan Council Member Marie McCarthy will be attending the June 20, 2016, City
Council Work Session. Metropolitan Council staff has requested that the City submit its
questions in advance so that Council Member McCarthy can be fully prepared to dis cuss issues
of interest to the City Council.
MEMORANDUM
Page 1 of 2
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Sue Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: 2016 State of the City
Discussion
A State of the City event has been held in four of the previous five years. During the last two
years, two separate events were held: one at Flaherty’s Arden Bowl on a weekday morning to be
convenient for the business community, and the second at City Hall on a weekday evening to be
more convenient for residents. Feedback for State of the City events has been positive, although
2015 attendance was less than in previous years.
Flaherty’s City Hall Total
2013 75 -- 75
2014 70 60 130
2015 40 35 75
The total cost of the 2015 events including advertising, food, and beverages was $2,261. Funds
are budgeted for a 2016 State of the City in the EDA budget.
The EDC recommends that the State of the City be held again in 2016, but that the event format
be changed. For the business-focused morning event, the EDC suggested that the City ask Land
O’Lakes, Boston Scientific, the TCAAP Master Developer, and MnDOT to each provide a short
presentation. The EDC felt that local businesses are interested in hear ing about business plans
for large business – both because it could affect their own business plans and as inspiration for
small businesses with growth ambitions.
In the past the morning event has been held on a Wednesday or Thursday in the second or third
week of September. The EDC recommended that the morning event be held at Flaherty’s again.
Potential dates for the morning event include:
• Wednesday, September 14
• Thursday, September 22
• Wednesday, September 28
AGENDA ITEM – 1F
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
• Thursday, September 29
Staff and the EDC discussed having the evening event focus on the TCAAP redevelopment
project and inviting the Master Developer to attend. This would allow the City to provide
residents with an update on the project and give the Master Developer an opportunity to
introduce themselves to the community. The EDC recommended that the event have an open
house format that would allow for interaction and be convenient for families to attend. Staff
recommends that the open house be scheduled for August or September, depending on when
Alatus could be ready.
Questions:
1. Would the City Council like to hold a business-focused State of the City event in 2016?
2. Does the City Council support the EDC’s recommendation for this year’s events?
3. If so, as staff works to co nfirm speakers, should any of the dates listed above be avoided?
4. Should a TCAAP open house be held in lieu of a resident-focused event as has been done
the past two years?
Attachment
• Draft City Meeting Calendars – August and September 2016
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1
Joint Development Authority
Mtg (JDA) – 5:30 pm
(City Hall)
2 3
EDC Mtg – 8:00 am
(Community Room)
Planning Commission Mtg –
6:30 pm (Council Chambers)
4 5 6
7 8
Regular Council Mtg –
7:00 pm
(Council Chambers)
9
Communications Committee
Mtg – 5:30 pm
(Council Conference Room)
10 11 12 13
14 15
Council Work Session - 5:00
pm (Council Chambers)
16 17 18
Sheriff’s Contract Cities Mtg-
8:00 am (Ramsey County
Sheriff)
19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29
Regular Council Mtg –
7:00 pm
(Council Chambers)
30 31
City Meeting Calendar (all dates subject to change) August 2016
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1 2 3
4 5
Labor Day –
City Hall Closed
6
Joint Development Authority
Mtg (JDA) – 5:30 pm
(City Hall)
Communications Committee Mtg –
5:30 pm
(Council Conference Room)
SUMMER HOURS END
7
EDC Mtg – 8:00 am
(Community Room)
Planning Commission Mtg –
6:30 pm (Council Chambers)
8 9 10
11 12
Regular Council Mtg –
7:00 pm
(Council Chambers)
13
FPAC Mtg – 6:00 pm
(Council Chambers)
14 15
Sheriff’s Contract Cities Mtg-
8:00 am (Ramsey County
Sheriff)
16 17
18 19
Council Work Session - 5:00
pm (Council Chambers)
20
PTRC Mtg – 6:30 pm
(Community Room)
21
LJFD Board Mtg – 7:30 am
(Shoreview Community Center)
22 23 24
25 26
Regular Council Mtg –
7:00 pm
(Council Chambers)
27 28 29 30
City Meeting Calendar (all dates subject to change) September 2016
Page 1 of 1
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Susan Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 2015 PMP Restoration
Background
Kristie Elfering with Elefring and Associates will be in attendance to provide the City Council
with and update on the 2015 PMP restoration and close out punch list.
Attachments
Attachment A: 2015 PMP punch list
AGENDA ITEM – 1G
MEMORANDUM
•
•
•
Page 1 of 1
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Susan Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: State Fair Parking Update
Requested Action
Provide staff with feedback on sign material and images.
Discussion
The City Council previously discussed this item and asked that public works look into a more
rigid sign for marking temporary no parking areas during the Minnesota State Fair. Additionally,
it was suggested that the signs indicate the consequences for disregarding the signs. I have
reviewed the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and found the manual does cover a
“Tow Away” symbol but does not have any accepted wording related to fines. We have also
researched materials to be used which would include a corrugated plastic sign which can be
printed with whatever sign image we request and a medium weight 6 foot fence post.
Public works will need to secure the materials and have them on hand for the end of August. We
are looking for feedback on the sign image and materials proposed to be used.
Attachments
Attachment A: No parking w/ tow away symbol
Attachment B: No parking here to corner w/ tow away symbol
Attachment C: No parking corner to here w/ tow away symbol
AGENDA ITEM – 1H
MEMORANDUM
ARTWORK APPROVAL NEEDED
Please check over this proof very carefully for errors including spelling.
By signing below,you assume all responsibility for measurement and
typographical errors.All colors are a simulation for placement only
and may not match printed colors exactly.Artwork created by
Newman Signs is the sole property of Newman Signs.Any
PROOF
reproduction of elements contained within this artwork t strictly prohibited.ssaPUi;itilV E: rout'jabs will remain can tIi rwu until this proof
is signed and returned.
FAttac7ment=A
12 in
8 3/4 in -- -- - - -
am
lk
83/4 in
18 in
4 1/4 in
Customer Approval
Approved As-Is
DATE: 5-9-16
SAVED AS: MN-NO PRK SYM TOW SYM-1218
Approved with Noted Changes COLOR: RED-BLACK ON WHITE
Need New Proof SALES REP: CHRISTINE/MARCIA
ARTWORK APPROVAL NEEDED
Please check over this proof very carefully for errors including spelling.
By signing below,you assume all responsibility for measurement and
typographical errors.All colors are a simulation for placement only
and may not match printed colors exactly.Artwork created by
Newman Signs is the sole property of Newman Signs.Any
PROOF
reproduction of elements contained within this artwork is strictly prohibited.
IMPORTANT:Your fobs will remain on HOLD until this proof
is signed and returned.
FAttachme=ntB
12 in
61n
6 in
18 inH F R 211 B
6 in
23/4 inORNERO
Customer Approval
j Approved As-Is
DATE: 5-9-16
SAVED AS: MN-NO PRK SYM HERE ETC-1218
Approved with Noted Changes COLOR: RED-BLACK ON WHITE
Need New Proof SALES REP: CHRISTINE/MARCIA
ARTWORK APPROVAL NEEDED
Please check over this proof very carefully for errors including spelling.
By signing below,you assume all responsibility for measurement and
typographical errors.All colors are a simulation for placement only
and may not match printed colors exactly.Artwork created by
Newman Signs is the sole property of Newman Signs.Any
PROOF
reproduction of elements contained within this artwork strictly prohibited.
IMPORTANT:ti cur juus will remain on HOLD until this proo
is signed and returned.
Attachment C
121n _- - --
6 in---
6 in
18 in 211 B
6 in
2 3/41
Q
Customer Approval
Approved As-is
DATE: 5-9-16
SAVED AS: MN-NO PRK SYM CORNER ETC-1218
Approved with Noted Changes COLOR: RED-BLACK ON WHITE
Need New Proof SALES REP: CHRISTI NE/MARCIA
Page 1 of 1
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Susan Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Arden View Court Storm Sewer Repair
Requested Action
Provide staff with feedback on repair.
Discussion
A segment of storm sewer pipe in the Arden View Court Area has developed a crack and
separated joint. As result of the separated joint and crack, sink holes are forming in the rear yard
above the pipe. Public Works has looked at various options to repair this pipe and found that
lining would be the most cost effective means. We have obtained two quotes for this repair and
Hydro-Klean is the lowest at $13,353.00. The funding for this repair will be from the surface
water management fund.
Attachments
Attachment A: Pipe Inspection Report
Attachment B: Location Map
Attachment C: Quotes for repair
AGENDA ITEM – 1I
MEMORANDUM
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Ftg.Code Description Position Severity Commentinlet at pond
Manhole at Turn around
0.0 MH Manhole 12 starting mh
45.7 C Crack 12 2 Crack Starts
52.2 C Crack 12 1 crack ends
97.8 C Crack 6 to 6 2 crack goes around the circumferance of
pipe
108.4 JS Joint Separated 5 Joint is seperated, gasket hanging from top
of pipe, large hole @ 8
116.1 JS Joint Separated 3 to 9 4 1 inch seperation at bottom of pipe
119.3 MH Manhole ending mh
inlet at pond
Manhole at Turn around
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
MH - Manhole @ 0.0 ft. starting mh C - Crack @ 45.7 ft. Crack Starts
C - Crack @ 52.2 ft. crack ends C - Crack @ 97.8 ft. crack goes around
the circumferance of pipe
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
JS - Joint Separated @ 108.4 ft. Joint is
seperated, gasket hanging from top of
pipe, large hole @ 8
JS - Joint Separated @ 108.4 ft. Joint is
seperated, gasket hanging from top of JS - Joint Separated @ 116.1 ft. 1 inch
seperation at bottom of pipe
MH - Manhole @ 119.3 ft. ending mh
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
Ftg.Code Description Position Severity Comment
0.0 MH Manhole 12 starting mh
45.7 C Crack 12 2 Crack Starts
52.2 C Crack 12 1 crack ends
97.8 C Crack 6 to 6 2 crack goes around the circumferance of pipe
108.4 JS Joint Separated 5 Joint is seperated, gasket hanging from top of
pipe, large hole @ 8
116.1 JS Joint Separated 3 to 9 4 1 inch seperation at bottom of pipe
119.3 MH Manhole ending mh
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
0' [MH] Manhole 12 starting mh
45.7' [C] Crack 12 2 Crack Starts
52.2' [C] Crack 12 1 crack ends
97.8' [C] Crack 6 to 6 2 crack goes around the circumferance of pipe
108.4' [JS] Joint Separated 5 Joint is seperated, gasket hanging from top of pipe, large hole @ 8
116.1' [JS] Joint Separated 3 to 9 4 1 inch seperation at bottom of pipe
119.3' [MH] Manhole ending mh
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
City of Arden Hills
Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 755-0211
Line Segment Block Number Upstream MH
inlet at pond
Downstream MH
Manhole at Turn
around
Section Number Date
09-Mar-2016
Surveyor
MA DS
Street
Arden View Court
City
Arden Hills
Weather
Size
15
Material
Concrete segments (unbolted)
Sewer Use
Stormwater
Purpose
Not Known
Length
Comments Pre-Cleaning TV Length
119.3
0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Distance (ft)
De
f
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
)
Generated on Wednesday, 3/9/2016 at 10:43 AM by the PipeTech® TV inspection system.
D
R
A M B L E R DNURSERY H I L L L N NUR S E R Y HI L L
")")
")
")
")")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")")
")")
")
")
")
")
436012910
14
8
2
440844404480
14
8
3
0 126812811304 435012751277
14
9
4
1291 4420
14
7
9
4348
44
6
0
14
8
0
4468 1309 13301308128712974414131513304415131012761292130013201280 13201314128413011300128013351290
14
7
0
1315 132512701305 1285
13
3
9
1307 13011266 12771286 129544901273
14
8
5
43
1
5
1267
15
0
9
1254
13
4
3
13
5
7
13
4
1
44
7
5
13
6
0
44
4
5
44
4
2
13
4
5
44
7
2
13
4
2
13
4
8
43
7
5
43
7
9
43
7
6
43
8
5
43
1
7
1285
14
5
9
43
6
8
14
5
1
14
3
0
14
2
6
14
2
5
14
3
7
14
2
9
44
7
1
14
6
7
14
5
6
43
9
0
43
7
1
13
5
2
14
3
3
14
5
5
14
6
3
44
8
4
44
8
7
43
9
3
14
6
0
44
6
8
14
5
2
14
4
8
14
3
4
14
6
4
1 35
8
13
4
7
44
7
4
44
4
3
44
7
3
13
4
6
13
5
9
44
4
4
44
8
3
13
5
6
14
7
9
44
8
0
44
7
6
14
7
2
44
6
3
44
2
2
43
6
7
43
6
4
44
2
3
44
6
0
14
7
8
13
5
5
44
7
9
14
7
3
14
8
0
14
8
1
43
7
3
43
7
4
43
8
4
14
4
4
14
2
2
43
2
4
13
5
1
14
6
5
14
4
9
44
8
5
44
6
9
44
7
0
44
8
6
14
3
6
14
5
3
14
3
2
14
5
4
43
9
1
14
5
8
14
3
5
43
6
9
43
7
0
14
6
1
14
5
7
14
6
2
14
2
8
43
9
2
14
2
4
14
6
6
14
3
1
14
2
7
14
5
0
13
5
0
44
1
1
14
2
3
44
1
9
44
0
7
44
0
3
44
6
1
44
3
3
44
3
0
43
9
6
43
9
5
44
1
2
44
3
4
44
2
9
44
5
3
44
6
2
44
0
8
44
2
0
43
7
8
44
1
0
44
3
5
44
3
7
44
0
2
44
0
9
43
3
2
14
7
7
44
4
6
44
3
2
44
3
1
44
0
6
44
2
8
43
9
7
14
7
4
44
1
3
44
5
2
43
3
5
43
9
4
44
3
6
44
1
8
44
2
1
14
4
7
43
4
2
43
8
3
44
5
9
44
0
1
44
1
7
44
6
4
44
4
1
43
9
8
14
6
8
44
6
7
14
4
3
44
1
4
44
2
7
14
7
1
43
8
9
43
8
6
44
5
6
44
2
4
14
4
2
44
3
8
43
7
7
44
4
7
44
5
4
14
3
8
14
4
5
44
8
2
14
7
5
43
3
4
44
7
7
43
3
3
43
6
5
44
7
8
43
6
6
44
8
1
14
7
6
14
4
6
14
3
9
44
6
6
44
3
9
44
1
5
44
4
0
14
7
0
44
5
7
43
8
7
43
8
8
44
2
5
14
6
9
44
2
6
44
5
8
44
1
6
43
9
9
44
0
0
44
6
5
44
5
5
43
2
5
43
4
3
43
2
6
43
2
7
43
3
1
14
4
0
43
4
4
14
4
1
43
4
5
13
6
1
1274 1284 12940
13
4
4
43
7
2
14
8
4
13
4
9
44
0
4
43
8
2
45
0
4
1267
13
6
2
44
4
8
14
8
7
43
5
2
15
1
1
43
8
0
43
8
1
44
0
5
13
5
4
13
5
3
1 1
2 2
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
r
e
p
a
i
r
X
April 25th, 2016
John Anderson, P.E.
City of Arden Hills, MN
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112-5743
RE: Insituform® Rehabilitation Estimate of 119 LF of 18”
Arden Hills, MN
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Insituform Technologies USA,LLC. (ITUSA) is pleased to submit to you this estimate for
the rehabilitation of 119 LF of 18” CIPP.
Over the past 35 years, ITI has rehabilitated over 75 million feet of sewer and drainage
piping worldwide. The Insituform® process consists of installing a specifically designed
resin saturated polyester felt tube into the exiting sewer and curing it in place. The result
is a seamless, jointless durable composite pipe within the old pipe, improving its structure
and minimizing leakage. The piping is returned to service in a fraction of the time
required by conventional methods. As a result, the Insituform® process is faster, cleaner,
safer, and performed at less cost than other repair alternatives.
Following is a cost estimate for installation of approximately 119 LF of 18-inch.
Insituform® Cured-in-Place Pipe designed as a fully structural pipe once installed.
Bid Item per Docs Description Measure Quantity Bid Price Total
1 CIPP 18" Storm LF 119.0 190.30$ 22,645.70$
This proposal serves as an estimate for completion of the work and can be adjusted to
take into consideration any unforeseen circumstances that may arise.
Final invoicing for the project will be adjusted accordingly utilizing actual time, labor,
and equipment portal to portal from approved time sheets. Therefore, by agreeing to this
proposal as written, if for unforeseen reasons the actual install time requires additional
days of labor, City of Arden HIlls agrees to pay the per day cost of additional labor.
SCOPE OF WORK & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The scope of work includes installation of approximately 119 LF of 18” CIPP. We will
robotically reinstate all services on a per each basis.
1177 Birch Lake Blvd. N
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Tel: (651) 253-0236
Fax: (651) 344-0806 www.insituform.com
The CIPP pipe designs are based on information provided by the customer and should be
verified by the customer prior to proceeding with this project. Should any other
conditions, existing or expected in the field, over the design life of the Insitupipe differ
from the information based herein, then the appropriate adjustments should be made to
the design calculations, along with the appropriate price adjustment.
Description Field Condition
Nominal Pipe Diameter: 18” round
Operating Temperature: Less than 100 degrees
Effluent Type: Storm
Number of Service Connections: N/A
Soil Depth over Invert: 8’ - 10’
Reason for Rehabilitation: Fully deteriorated, infiltration
PROPOSAL INCLUSIONS
• Certificate of Insurance with standard coverage (see attached)
• One mobilization and demobilization
• Final cleaning of loose debris from the piping prior to installation
• As-built video inspection and CD
• Standard PPE for installation crew
• Standard one-year warranty
PROPOSAL EXCLUSIONS
The prices stated in this proposal do not include the following items. If provided by
Contractor, the cost will be charged as extras; otherwise Owner will furnish these items at
no cost to Contractor:
• Performance/Payment Bond (at 2.5% of proposal price)
• Special Insurance such as OCP, Builders Risk
• Water from a fire hydrant or other high volume source within a convenient
distance
• Removal and disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials encountered
• Any holiday work, nighttime work, rush delivery or adverse weather work
LIMITED WARRANTY
IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER EXPRESSED, IMPLIED AND/OR STATUTORY.
WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, CONTRACTOR AGREES TO
CORRECT ANY DEFECTS IN THE MATERIALS OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY
CONTRACTOR WHICH ARE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF
CONTRACTOR WITHIN ONE YEAR FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONTRACTOR'S WORK, PROVIDED OWNER AFFORDS CONTRACTOR
SUITABLE ACCESS AND WORKING CONDITIONS TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH
CORRECTION.
STANDARD TERMS and CONDITIONS
Removal, transporting, and disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials encountered
during the project will be the responsibility of the Owner.
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization necessary to complete the
Insituform® process per the above conditions, and Insituform® specifications, are
included.
Any restrictions in our normal weekday work hours required by local, state, and/or
federal authorities (due to noise restrictions or other reasons not known at the time of this
proposal) will be an extra charge.
MUTUAL RELEASE OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
Neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages relating to or arising
out of the Contract.
PAYMENT TERMS
• Payment due in full due within thirty days of completion of the project, no
retainage to be held
• Prices stated are in effect for sixty days (60) from the date of this proposal
We appreciate your interest in the Insituform process and giving us the opportunity to
quote on your pipe rehabilitation needs which will protect your investment as well as the
environment. Should you desire additional information please feel free to give me a call
at 651-253-0236.
Sincerely,
INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC.
Mitchell Hoeft, P.E.
Mitchell Hoeft, P.E., Business Development Manager
*************************************************************
Accepted: City of Arden Hills, MN
Signed: ________________________________ Date: _________________________
Printed Name/Title: ____________________________________________________
Is this Project Tax Exempt? ________ If Yes, please provide Tax Exemption Form and,
where applicable, Project Exemption Form.
Does this Project require Certified Payroll? ______
Are there wage rates? _______ if yes, please provide a copy of the wage rates.
This accepted proposal constitutes a formal agreement. If you initiate a purchase
order or other contract document it shall not be acknowledged without this accepted
proposal as an attachment.
Accepted By: Insituform Technologies USA, LLC.
By: ____________________________________
Date: __________________________________
Wade Anderson
Sales & Marketing
Coordinator
CFO
Michele McGreal
ExpiresDate
5/14/20163/21/2016
Hydro-Klean
Quote Number
Freight On Board
Prepared By
Rogers, MN
Michele McGreal
Delivery /
Availability
Terms
Net 20
PROPOSAL
City of Arden Hills
Arden Hills, MN 55112
1245 West Highway 96
City of Arden Hills
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Arden View Court
Quantity Units Description Price Amount
Projected probable project cost to perform the following tasks on a unit cost basis:
Install a 15" x 30' CIPP point repair in 3 sections, overlapping the ends. Pipe must be clean, accessible via
both ends, and not be under water.
Variations in the work scope will require execution of a change order.
1.00 Each CIPP Spot Repair, 18" x 30'$12,753.00 $12,753.00
1.00 Each Mobilization of crew and equipment $600.00 $600.00
*NOTE: Proposal does not include any applicable taxes
*Total
$13,353.00
Prepared By:
Accepted By:
Approved By:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Bill To:
Ship To:
QTE034657 schedule
permitting
Title:PO#:
Des Moines, IA Mankato, MN Sioux Falls, SD Watertown, SDRogers, MN
855-845-5326
Page 1 of 2
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Susan Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Lakeshore Place Landscaping
Requested Action
Provide staff with feedback on this funding scenario.
Background
In 2011 along with the discussion related to municipal consent for the County Rd 96 / TH 10
grade separation project there was a commitment made to provide visual screening for Lakeshore
Place residents. The details of this screening was to be provided in two parts. The first a tall
poured concrete wall on top of the retaining wall that separates Lakeshore place from the
interchange. The second part discussed involved plantings to help screen the highway from the
residences.
Discussion
Ramsey County has worked with MnDOT landscape partnership to develop a plan to provide
both landscape amenities and screening. The funding for this work is proposed to be provided
through a number of sources. Generally, the following is the concept of funding for funding this
work. Long term maintenance of the planting on Lakeshore Place would be up to the City of
Arden Hills. Ramsey County would be responsible for maintenance on the other plantings.
Component Funding Source
Plant materials in MnDOT ROW Ramsey County to be reimbursed by grant
Plant materials in Lakeshore Place ROW City of Arden Hills
Labor in MnDOT ROW Ramsey County
Labor in Lakeshore Place Ramsey County
AGENDA ITEM – 1J
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
Attachments
Attachment A: July 11, 2011 Public Hearing Minutes
Attachment B: September 26, 2011 Municipal Consent Minutes
Attachment C: Resolution 2011-048
Attachment D: Resident Correspondence
Attachment E: Lakeshore Place Planting Plan
Attachment F: MnDOT partnership planting plan
From:Katie Bach
To:Lux, Joseph
Cc:Zenge, Philip (DOT);John Anderson;Nate Cmiel;tworwa@aspenwaste.com;Mike & Lacy Loosbrock;Dave
Cmiel;Engum, Beth A;Diane Cmiel
Subject:Re: FW: Highway 10 Off Ramp Landscaping Plan
Date:Friday, May 6, 2016 12:53:59 PM
Attachments:image009.png
Thank you all for coming out today! We really appreciate your time. Below is a summary of
our discussion:
Attendees: Joe Lux (Ramsey County), John Anderson (Arden Hills), Philip Zenge (MnDOT),
Joe (Arden Hills), Katie Bach, Nate Cmiel, Dave Cmiel, Diane Cmiel, Lacy Loosbrock, Troy
Worwa (residents)
1. Slope north of guardrail: Philip will update the plan to include Black Hills Spruce on the
north side of the guardrail instead of Fragrant Sumac. Where there is enough space he will try
to stagger the trees for denser screening. This area is MnDOT right of way and should be part
of the MnDOT funding. If necessary, funding could be re-appropriated by eliminating the
fragrant sumac from near the holding pond on the northwest side of the 10/96 intersection,
since that isn't providing functional screening. There is a 6" sewer main running about 8-9'
down. I believe John indicated that it is placed directly under the guardrail so shouldn't be a
concern for the trees. Philip was also concerned there may be a gas line in this area so the
crew will need to be careful with tree placement.
2. Shrubs along retaining wall: We agreed to remove the shrubs from the plan and instead
place a full line of Arborvitae along the retaining wall. This will help provide screening at
different angles from each property. At the south end of the wall where there is not enough
space for Arborvitae, we will keep the Nannyberry to provide visual interest. There will be
mulch placed around each tree when they are planted. The trees will need help from residents
to keep them well watered to ensure success.
3. Techny vs Emerald or Pyramid Arborvitae: General consensus was that the Techny would
provide a better overall screening since it will grow wider and fill in the space between trees,
while still growing tall and being less prone to splitting. Emerald or Pyramid Arborvitae
would end up with a more "picket fence" look because of its narrower shape. The Techny
Arborvitae should not require significant pruning. If it does begin to overgrow the road (15-20
years from now) the City would cut it back to keep the road clear.
4. Next steps: Philip will send an updated plan to Joe Lux, who will calculate funding needed
from the City. John Anderson will request City Council approval of funding at the May 31
meeting. John will cc residents on the funding request being sent so that residents can indicate
our support and attend the council meeting if needed.
5. Intersection and bridge lighting: Under-bridge lighting shines sideways and directly into
residents' homes. Joe Lux will address this by seeing if the lights can be angled down,
switched out for LEDs (which were what was indicated in the plan), and/or add shielding. The
overhead lights at the intersection are also bright with excess non-directional light. Joe will
investigate if these can be switched out for LEDs to provide more directional light to the
sidewalk only. This would also save the County money in the long run.
6. 96 median and areas between path and road: There is no immediate plan to do anything
more with these. The City may have a more comprehensive 96 median landscaping plan
which could be updated along with the TCAAP development.
7: Drainage behind fence along 96 (west of Lakeshore Place end): Prior to construction there
was a ditch in this area. Joe Lux will follow up further to improve drainage leading to the
culvert.
Thank you! We look forward to seeing the updated plan and having the plants installed soon!
Katie
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Lux, Joseph <Joseph.Lux@co.ramsey.mn.us> wrote:
I’ll be there.
Joe Lux
Joseph Lux
Senior Planner
Ramsey County Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112-3933
651-266-7114
http://www.ramseycounty.us/
From: Katie Bach [mailto:katiebach@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:19 AM
To: Zenge, Philip (DOT) <Philip.Zenge@state.mn.us>
Cc: Lux, Joseph <Joseph.Lux@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US>; John Anderson
<JAnderson@cityofardenhills.org>; Nate Cmiel <nate.cmiel@gmail.com>;
tworwa@aspenwaste.com; Mike & Lacy Loosbrock <mikeandlacy@gmail.com>; Dave Cmiel
<dfcmiel@gmail.com>; Engum, Beth A <beth.engum@co.ramsey.mn.us>
51
76
D
U
N
L
A
P
S
T
.
D
R
.
NORTHWOODS
1
s
t
RED FOX RD.
51
A
V
E
.
L
E
X
I
N
G
T
O
N
COUNTY RD.
77
F
ST.
Karth
Lake
Sunfish
Lake
10th
T30N R23W
8 9
17 16
96
M i n n e s o t a
C o m m e r c i a l
V
A
L
E
N
T
I
N
E
C
T.
96
46 47
694
12
O
L
D
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
8
106
1 0
6
1 0
6
1 0
6
1 0
6
1. BRIARKNOLL CIR.
105
2. ARDEN OAKS CT.
3. NURSERY HILL CT.
694 10
20 21
2829
51
S H
O R
E
V
I
E
W
N
E
W
B R
I
G H
T
O N
N
E
W
B R
I
G H
T
O N
1
0
8
108108
96
5. BANYAN ST.
6.
4. MOUNDS AVE.
6. ABELE ST.
A
V
E
.
1
0
1 1 2
DR.
CT.
CUMMINGS PARK
DR.
WYNCREST
N
C
ST
WY
R
E
W
Y
R
E
S
T
L
N.
NC
R
D
.
IV
G L
E
N
C T .EW
BETHEL D
R.
W
A
Y
B
R
I
G
H T
O
N
CRYSTAL
A V E .
A
V
E
.
V
R
O
L
L
I
N G
H I
L
L
S
VENUS
A
V
E
.
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W AVE.
GLENVIEW
D
E
L
L
A
V
I
E
W
CT.
RD.
E
.GRAMSIE
V
AVE.
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
C
H
A
T
H
A
M
C
H
A
A
MAV
E.
TH
W
A
Y
GATE
CT.
GATEWAY BLVD.
DR.
Round
Lake
Valentine
Lake
A
V
E
.
105
115
AVE.
115 ALENTINE
S
N
E
L
L
I
N
G
INDIAN OAKS
OAKS
INDIAN
CT.
TR.
AVE.
C I R .
EIDECIR.
G
A
L
E
AMBLE RD.
NURSERY
HILL
K
A
R
T
H
LAKE DR.
A
M
BLE
D
R.
H
A
M
L
I
N
E
A
V
E
.
L E
N
VISTA
CT.
36.
ARD
A
ARDEN
DR
.VIE
W
ARDEN
DR.
N
O
R
M
A
.
INDIAN OAKS
CIR.
C
OLLEEN
C O L L E E N
COLLEEN
CT.
J
A
M
E
S
A
V
E
.
D
E
L
L
W
O
O
D
S
T
.
N
.
S
N
E
L
L
I
N
G
A
V
E
.
50
50
Mc CLUNG
DR.
C
I R
.
A M
BLE
KARTH
L
A
K
E
C
I
R.PLEASANT
CIR.
40.
N
O
R
M A
A
V
E
.
LL
RK
B
RI
A
N
O
T
S
A
N
L
E
A
P
D
R
.
ROY
V
I
E
W
CT.
DAWN CIR.
FLORAL DR.
C
I
R
.
J
A
M
E
S
C
I
R
.
21 22
16 15
T30N R23W
694
VALENTINE
CREST
RD.
VALENTINE
J A NET C
IR
.
L
A
K
E
RD.B
R
U
E
B
E
R
R
Y
O
L
D
H
W Y
.
76
PARKSHORE DR.
WEDGEWOOD
CIR.
L
A
K
E
P
L.
76 10
S
H
O
R
E
Trailer
Court
P
R
I
O
R
A
V
.
P
R
I
O
R
C
T
.
PRIORAVE.
L
I
S
A
L
CIR.
C
IR.
D
R
.
CT.
D
R
.
T
O
D
D
35W
T30N R23W
R
O
U
N
D
L
A
K
E
R
D
.
W .
73
35W
12
T O
D D
13th ST.
73
E2RD
.
CO.W.
L
A
K
E
V
I
E W
BOSTON
SCIENTIFIC
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N
W
A
Y
KEITHSON
D
R
.
C
I
R
.
N.
L
N.
LN.
ROYAL LN.
L
N
.
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
.
4/14/2016 10:29:13 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:
FEET
IN
SCALES
0
0
NO SCALE
200
30
INDEX MAP
GENERAL LAYOUT
PLAN
Design Speed
ADT (Current Year)
MPH
201236,000
65 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
TITLE SHEET
1STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10=393)
PLAN REVISIONS
DATE SHEET NO.APPROVED BY
DESIGN DESIGNATION - TIER NO.
Ramsey
Metro
PROJECT LOCATION
COUNTY:
DISTRICT:
FOR PLANS & UTILITIES SYMBOLS SEE TECHNICAL MANUAL
CHARGE IDENTIFIERPROJ. NO
SP 6205-969
BBBB-BB
CCCC-CC
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR LANDSCAPING
T.H.10 AT CSAH 96 IN ARDEN HILLS
SP 6205-969
AA-AAA-AA
729+00.050 738+00.035
LOCATED ON FROM
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINN. PROJ. NO.
GROSS LENGTH
BRIDGES-LENGTH
EXCEPTIONS-LENGTH
NET LENGTH
FEET MILES
REF. POINT TO REF. POINT
FEET MILES
FEET MILES
FED. PROJ. NO.
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS
STATE FUNDS
"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN.
THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
APPROVED 20
20
20
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:
LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP COORDINATOR
DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP COORDINATOR
DISTRICT ENGINEER
INDEX
TITLE SHEET
GENERAL LAYOUT
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
PLANT STOCK TABULATIONS
LANDSCAPE PLAN
1
2
3
4
5-7
8-10STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (A-C)
THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS10
ARDEN HILLS
FEET MILES
TO REF. POINT
PROJECT LOCATION
SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
8' BERM
6' WALK
10'SHLD
12'
14'
14'
12'
10'SHLD
8' BERM
10' TRAIL
14'X240'LTL
8' BERM6' WALK
12'
12'
14'X320'RTL
14'
12'
10'SHLD
10'TRAIL
8' BERM
14'X100'LTL
12'
12'
12'
12'
14'X260'RTL12'
12'
12'
12'
14'X260' RTL
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
4
'
S
H
L
D
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
1
2
'
1
2
'
4
'
S
H
L
D
4'SHLD
12'12'10'SHLD
4'SHLD
12'12'10'SHLD
14'
12'
10' SHLD
8' BERM
10' TRAIL
14'X420' RTL
6' WALK
8' BERM
10' SHLD
18' MEDIAN
10' SHLD
6' WALK
8'MED
14'X265' RTL
10' TRAIL
8' BERM
10' SHLD
12'
14'
14'X350' LTL16' MEDIAN
1
2
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
4
'
S
H
L
D
POT. 10+00.00
1
0
P
I . 1 1 +6 0 .0 0
15
P
O
T
.
1
6
+
0
0
.
0
0
P
I . 1 1 +2 0 .0 0
1
:
1
0
1
:
1
0
1
:
1
0
1:101:5
1:15
1:15
1:15
1
:
1
5
1:15
1
:
1
2
1:10
1:8
1:5
1
:
5
1:5
1:5
1
:
5
0
1
:
2
5
1
:
1
5
1:15
1:15
1
:
1
5
1
:
5
0
1
2
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
1
4
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
14'
12'
10' SHLD
10' SHLD
2
2
'
1
0
'
1
2
'
L
T
L
1
8
'
6
'
S
H
L
D
4
'
S
H
L
D
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
1
2
'
1
2
'
4
'
S
H
L
D
1
2
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
1
0
'
1
8
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
1
6
'
1
6
'
1
8
'
1
4
'
X
1
2
0
'
R
T
L
1
4
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
4
'
S
H
L
D
1
2
'
1
2
'
1
2
'
4
'
S
H
L
D
1
0
'
S
H
L
D
14'
12'
10'SHLD
10'SHLD
12'
14'
14'
12'
14'X 260'RTL
14'X 100'LTL12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
14'X 240'RTL
14'X 320'LTL
12'
14'
10'SHLD
12'
12'
1
7
'
1
7
'
4'MED
4
'
M E
D
8
'
M
E
D
18' MEDIAN16' MEDIAN
40'
0.2'
0.2
'
2
2
'
3
3
'
1
8
'
2
0
'
2
0
'
1
4
'
1
4
'
1
2
'
1
4
'
2
7
'
2
4
'
1
8
'
1
2
'
1
4
'
+
2
2
+
3
6
+
0
1
+
0
0
+
0
4 +
4
2
+19
1:5
+
1
5
+
0
0
+
6
9
+
8
0
+
4
9
+
4
4
+
2
4
+
4
1
+
9
2
+
3
7 +
1
7
+
0
2
+
8
2
+
7
1
+
4
1
+
5
1
+
2
1
8' BERM
8
'
B
E
R
M
8' BERM
1
:
5
+
9
5
+
8
3
+
5
1
+
9
0
+
7
5
+
8
5
8' BERM
8' BERM
8' BERM
8' BERM
60"RCP
6
0
"
R
C
P
+17
+17
+38
+18
+98
+98
+2 0
+
4
0
+
4
9+
0
0
+05 +
5
4
+
1
0
+
1
5
+13
+65
+57
+21
+41
+94
+52
+70
+66
+24
+
8
8
APR EL 922.0
OUTL 910.0TC 928.5
EL AT END OF PIPE 905.0
H
W L
8
9
3
.
5
D
R
Y
P
O
N
D
H
W L
8
9
3
.
5
D
R
Y
P
O
N
D
+25
14'X 260' RTL
1
4
'
X
2
6
5
'
R
T
L
1
4
'
X
3
0
0
'
L
T
L
1
4
'
X
4
0
0
'
T
H
R
U
/
R
T
L
A
N
E
6' CON. WALK
10' BIT. TRAIL
1
4
'
X
4
2
0
'
R
T
L
1
4
'
X
3
5
0
'
L
T
L
1
0
'
B
I
T
.
T
R
A
I
L
6
'
C
O
N
.
W
A
L
K
2
0
'
5 0
'
3
0
'
10' BIT. TRAIL
6' CON. WALK
10'BIT. TRAIL
6' CON. WALK
1
8
'
+60
+07
+00
+25
+25
+75
(FUTURE) 14'X 300' LTL
+43
+85
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
C
O
N
S
T
B
R
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
P
A
N
E
L
C
O
N
S
T
B
R
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
P
A
N
E
L
C
O
N
S
T
B
R
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
P
A
N
E
L
C
O
N
S
T
B
R
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
P
A
N
E
L
+10
STRIPPED MEDIAN
E
N
I
L
M
R
E B
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
B
U
I
L
D
T
O
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
O
N
L
Y
+40
WILDLIFE EASEMENT
U.S. FISH AND
D
4
2
4
C
&
G
B424 C&G
B
6
2
4
C
&
G
+36
SYSTEM B
SIGNAL
B
6
2
4
C
&
G
+34
B424 C&G
B424 C&G
B424 C&G
B424 C&G
1
0
'
LANE
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B4
2
4
C&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B424 C&G
B424 C&G
D
4
2
4
C
&
G
D
4
2
4
C
&
G
D
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
C
&
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
A
S
I
G
N
A
L
1
2
'
B
6
2
4
C
&
G
+38
1
0
'
LANE
+
5
5
1
8
'
D 4
1
2
C&
G
D 412
C &
G
B
I
T
F
L
U
M
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
B
6
2
4
C
&
G
B424 MOD C&G
B424 MOD C&G
B424 MOD C&G 1
8
'
M
E
D
I
A
N
B
4
2
4
M
O
D
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
M
O
D
C
&
G
B
4
2
4
M
O
D
C
&
G
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
B424 MOD C&G+
6
0
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
W
A
L
E
6
'
C
O
N
.
W
A
L
K
1
0
'
1
0
'
1
0
'
20'
20'
20'
60'3
5
'
48'5
0'
1
5
'
18'
2
0
'
2
0
'
4
0
'
1 0 '
900898896
900898896
902900898896
898
896
894
902
8
9
8
898896
894
8
9
6
8
9
4
900898896
904
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
8
9
8
9
0
0
8
9
6
8
9
4
9
0
4
9
0
0
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
9
0
2
9
0
0
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
900898896894
900898896894
9
0
2
9
0
0
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
896898
900
9
0
0
8
9
2
8
9
2
892
892
8
9
2
8
9
2
8
9
2
892
892
894
MH
9
0
2
8
9
6
8
9
8
9
0
0
9
0
0
9
1
0
9
0
8
9
1
2
MH
M H
M H
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
906
906
908
908
908906
908 910
910
T
/
E
R /
W
P
R
O
P
R/W INP
R
/
W
I
N P
R/
W INP
MH
8
5
7
5 7
5
7
0
1
5
9
75
150
5
1
5
1
75
7595
75 100
1
3
3
88
4
0
10
33
33
PONDING
EASEMENT
PONDING
EASEMENT
PONDING
EASEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
13
9
12 12
12
12
1212
12
13
13
13
1
1 1
2
8
7
4
3
HOLIDAY LAKE ADDITION
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
L
A
K
E
S
H
O
R
E
H
O
M
E
SI
T
E
S
LAKESHORE HO
MESITES
B
L
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 1
L
O
T
1
LOT 1
L
O
T
2
L
O
T
3
L
O
T
4
LOT 5
LOT 6
LOT 2
LOT 3
L
A
K
E
S
H
O
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
TOP OF PIPE FOR LINE ONLY
3 FOOT LONG PIPE TO EAST NO LONGER CONNECTED TO ST
HEADWALLHEADWALL
HEADWALL
COULD NOT LOCATE MH
MAY HAVE TO BE TELEVISED
FROM CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FLOWS WEST - CONNECTS WITH RCP8
MEX HAT
FROM NE END NOT FOUND
FROM E END NOT FOUNDTO SOUTH END NOT FOUND
FLOWS FROM NE END NOT FOUND
TO SOUTHWEST ACROSS TH10TO SOUTHWEST ACROSS TH10
NORTHEAST 8001 917.87TOP OF WALL PRIVATE SIDE SOUTH END 8002 905.47BOTTOM OF WALL FREEWAY SIDE SOUTH END 8000 917.87TOP OF WALL FREEWAY SIDE SOUTH END 8003 905.47BOTTOM OF WALL PRIVATE SIDE SOUTH END
ESTIMATED POSITION
FROM MAPS
T B 6 1 6 7
XCEL FROM MAPS T B 6 1 6 8
XCEL FROM MAPS
TB6169
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B 6 1 7 2
XCEL FROM MAPS T B 6 1 7 3
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6174
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6175
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B 6 1 7 6
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B 6 1 7 7
XCEL FROM MAPS T B 6 1 7 8
XCEL FROM MAPS TB6179
XCEL FROM MAPS T B 6 1 80
XCEL FROM MAPS T B 6181
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B6340
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6341
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6342
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6343
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B 6 1 7 1
XCEL FROM MAPS T B6344
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B6345
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B6346
XCEL FROM MAPS
T B6347
XCEL FROM MAPS
SOUTHNORTH K R 8 0 1 0 9 0 1 .1 6 C20 BORING K R 8 0 1 1 9 0 2 .8 8 C21 BORING K R 8012 916.8 4 C22 BORING
KR8013 9 1 7 .5 4 C23 BORING
K R 8 0 1 4 9 1 8 .8 1 C24 BORING
WATER INVERT 9.5
WATER INVERT 6.7
FROM NW HEADWALL
0 .000.0 0 0 .0 0 0.0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 00.0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0.0 0 0 .000.0 0 SAFETY APRON
SAFETY APRON
SAFETY APRON
SAFETY APRON 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 9 1 6 .8 2 9 1 3 .6 4 915.8 8920.7 5 9 1 3 .0 6 9 14.8 2 9 1 6 .7 4 9 17.1 0 9 1 7 .09913.56915.8 2 920.7 5912.9 7 9 1 4 .8 5 9 1 7 .4 3 9 1 7 .1 0 JDR6012 9 1 5 .8 1 9 2 0 .8 2 912.9 4914.8 2 9 1 6 .2 5 9 1 4 .9 5 9 1 7 .8 0 921.9 0915.1 1 9 1 5 .6 2 9 1 6 .35915.0 7 9 1 7 .65921.4 8 9 15.2 9 9 1 5 .6 8 9 2 1 .6 6 9 2 1 .7 5 9 2 1 .3 7 9 2 0 .7 2 9 2 0 .53914.4 3 9 1 7 .8 1 918.3 2919.5 4 9 21.7 4 9 1 9 .0 8 9 1 8 .2 0 9 1 7 .7 8 9 1 8 .2 1 9 1 7 .2 3 9 1 7 .2 2 9 1 8 .9 6 9 1 8 .3 9 9 1 7 .92916.9 0 9 1 7 .9 9
4/14/2016 10:29:14 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
GENERAL LAYOUT
2STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
SCALE IN FEET
200
LIC. NO.
CSAH 96
U
S
1
0
END SP 6205-969
BEGIN SP 6205-969
(T.H. 10) STA. 738+00.035
(T.H. 10) STA. 729+00.050
ARDEN HILLS
REF. POINT 729+00.050
BEGIN SP 6205-969
REF. PT. 738+00.035
END SP 6205-969
SHEET NO. 7
SHEET NO. 6
SHEET NO. 5
LIC. NO.
DESCRIPTION UNITS
ESTIMATED
S.P.6205-969
2571.501 B&B HT 4' TREECONIFEROUS TREE 16
2571.503 B&B HT 5' TREEORNAMENTAL TREE 6
2571.505 CONT HT 12" SHRUBDECIDUOUS SHRUB 118
2571.602 PROTECTIONRODENT EACH 6
2574.550 2 GRADECOMPOST YDCU 56
2575.511 6 TYPE MATERIALMULCH YDCU 56
DELIVERY EACH 3
3) CALL 811 BEFORE PLANTING BED PREPARATION AND TREE HOLE DIGGING.
THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA".
WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR
2) THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL
1) NO UTILITIES WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
ITEM No.
UTILITY NOTES:
GENERAL NOTES:
1
SEQ NOTES:
1 RODENT PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL ORNAMENTAL TREES PER STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (C) SHEET.
B. RESTORE ALL DAMAGED TURF AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, TO PRE-LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION CONDITIONS.
A. SEE THE PLANT STOCK TABULATION TABLE FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANT QUANTITIES AND PLANT SPECIES.
4/14/2016 10:29:15 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
3STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
LIC. NO.
KEY SPECIES UNITS
depth 12" & spread root 16" Spread, 2' Ht.,3.5'TOTAL 16
BHS HILLS BLACKSPRUCE,TREE 16
densata glaucaPicea
depth 13.5" & spread root 18" Ht.,4.5'TOTAL 6
IPH IMPERIALHONEYLOCUST,TREE 6
(Impcole) inermis triacanthosGleditsia
Cont. 2 No. Ht.,10.5"TOTAL 118
GBC BLACK GLOSSYCHOKEBERRY,Shrub 24
melonocarpaAronia
DGS GOLDFLAMESPIREA,Shrub 18
(Goldflame) bumalda xSpiraea
FGS FRAGRANTSUMAC,Shrub 31
aromaticaRhus
STS STAGHORNSUMAC,Shrub 45
typhinaRhus
140
CONIFEROUS TREE 4' HT B&B
ORNAMENTAL TREE 5' HT B&B
DECIDUOUS SHRUB 12" HT CONT
QUANTITY
TOTALMINIMUM ACCEPTABLE DIMENSIONS
PLANT STOCK TABULATION S.P. 6205-969
TOTAL (Planting Material)
4/14/2016 10:29:16 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
PLANT STOCK TABULATIONS
4STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
M
M
7
3
0
7
3
0
5
0
5
140
1
0
7
0
4
0
MEX HAT T B 6 1 7 8
XCEL FROM MAPS
LIC. NO.
KEY SPECIES QUANT.SPACING
BHS HILLS BLACKSPRUCE,7
IPH IMPERIALHONEYLOCUST,3 SHOWNAS
GBC BLACK GLOSSYCHOKEBERRY,12 O.C.5'
DGS GOLDFLAMESPIREA,18 O.C.4'
STS STAGHORNSUMAC,15 O.C.6'
12' O.C.
(9) DGS_12" Ht._Cont.
(7) BHS_4' Ht._B&B
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_5' Ht._B&B
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_1.25" Cal._B&B
(9) DGS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_1.25" Cal._B&B
(12) GBC_12" Ht._Cont.
CSAH 96
U
S
1
0
S
B
U
S
1
0
N
B
L
A
K
E
S
H
O
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
O
L
D
U
S 10
MATCHLINE SHEET NO. 6
REF. POINT 729+00.050
BEGIN SP 6205-969
4/14/2016 10:29:17 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
LANDSCAPE PLAN
5STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
SCALE IN FEET
30
M
M
M
7
3
5
7
3
5
240
1
0
4
0
0
6
0
"
R
C
P
E
D
90089
88
9
6
902900898896
902900898
904
896898
MH
1
5
9
150
33 T B 6 1 7 2
XCEL FROM MAPS
LIC. NO.
KEY SPECIES QUANT.SPACING
IPH IMPERIALHONEYLOCUST,3 SHOWNAS
GBC BLACK GLOSSYCHOKEBERRY,12 O.C.5'
FGS FRAGRANTSUMAC,31 O.C.6'
STS STAGHORNSUMAC,30 O.C.6'
(12) GBC_12" Ht._Cont.
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_1.25" Cal._B&B
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_5' Ht._B&B
(31) FGS_12" Ht._Cont.
(1) IPH_1.25" Cal._B&B
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
(5) STS_12" Ht._Cont.
E
X
I
T
R
A
M
P
U
S
1
0
U
S
1
0
S
B
U
S
1
0
N
B
E
N
T
R
Y
R
A
M
P
U
S
1
0
CSAH 96
MATCHLINE SHEET NO. 5
MATCHLINE SHEET NO. 7
4/14/2016 10:29:18 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
LANDSCAPE PLAN
6STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
SCALE IN FEET
30
1
0
1
3
1
4
1
1
4
0
5
60"RCP
9
0
4
9
0
0
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
8
9
6
8
9
4
900898896894
900898896894
9
0
2
9
0
0
8
9
8
8
9
6
8
9
4
8
9
2
8
9
2
892
892
9
0
2
9
1
0
9
0
8
9
1
2
M
H
M
H
MH
906
906
908
908
908906
908 910
910
MH
LIC. NO.
KEY SPECIES QUANT.SPACING
BHS HILLS BLACKSPRUCE,9 12' O.C.
(9) BHS_4' Ht._B&B
U
S
1
0
N
B
U
S
1
0
S
B
U
S
1
0
E
X
I
T
R
A
M
P
MATCHLINE SHEET NO. 6
REF. PT. 738+00.035
END SP 6205-969
4/14/2016 10:29:19 AM
DATE PRINTED:TIME PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PHILIP ZENGE
DENNIS MOLINE
PHILIP ZENGE
SIGNATURE
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
LANDSCAPE PLAN
7STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
SCALE IN FEET
30
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIPDAVID LARSON
DATE PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (A)
8STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
PLANTING SOIL
INPLACE CULTIVATED SOILS
THOROUGHLY MIXED WITH
SPECIFIED ADDITIVES
COMPOST AND OTHER
4 INCHES OF GRADE 2
MACHINE
SPADING
DIRECTION OF
MACHINE
SPADING
DIRECTION OF
PRIMARY TILLAGE - PASS 1
INCORPORATION TILLAGE - PASS 2
(MnDOT 2571.3D)
1
2
"
(MnDOT 2571.3D.2)
DEPTH
INPLACE SOIL
CULTIVATED
1 6
"
ZONE BY DATESPLANTING
S
P
R
I
N
G D
E
C
I D
U
O
U
S
ROOT
BARE 21 APRIL 7 APRIL
TO TO
1 JUNE 1 JUNE
B&B
CONTAINER
21 APRIL 7 APRIL
TO TO
30 JUNE 30 JUNE
CONIFEROUS
21 APRIL 7 APRIL
TO TO
1 JUNE 17 MAY
PERENNIALS
1 MAY 1 MAY
TO TO
30 JUNE 30 JUNE
SEEDLINGS
21 APRIL 7 APRIL
TO TO
1 JUNE 1 JUNE
F
A
L
L D
E
C
I D
U
O
U
S
ROOT
BARE 1OCT. 10OCT.
TO TO
1NOV. 15NOV.
B&B
CONTAINER
25AUG. 25AUG.
TO TO
15OCT. 1NOV.
CONIFEROUS
25AUG. 25AUG.
TO TO
15SEPT. 15SEPT.
PERENNIALS
25AUG. 25AUG.
TO TO
15SEPT. 15SEPT.
3 4
DATES.PLANTING
DECIDUOUS FALL THE FOLLOW OR1ST
JUNE THAN LATER NO SPRING THEIN
PLACED BE MUST PERENNIALS ROOTBARE1.
ENGINEER. THE BYDETERMINED
AS CONDITIONS, SEASONALUPON
DEPENDING CHANGE MAY DATESACTUAL2.
SUMAC. AND OAKS,PLUM/CHERRY,
CRABAPPLE, WILLOW,MAPLE,
ASH, MOUNTAIN BIRCH,HONEYLOCUST,
IRONWOOD, LINDEN, HACKBERRY,POPLAR,
DOGWOOD, HAWTHORN,SPECIES:
FOLLOWING THE OF FORM ROOTBARE
FOR ALLOWED NOT IS PLANTINGFALL3.
PERIOD. ESTABLISHMENT PLANTTHE
OF YEAR FIRST THEDURING PLANTING)
(FALL SEPTEMBER AND PLANTING)(SPRING
MAY OF MONTH THE DURINGPLACED
BE MUST PLANTS REPLACEMENTALL4.
PROVISIONS. SPECIAL THE IN SPECIFIEDBE
WILL DATES PLANTING MOVEDMACHINED5.
PLANT INSTALLATION PERIOD
ACCEPTABLE PLANT STOCK GROWING RANGE LIMITS
SOURCE: USDA PLANT HARDINESS ZONE MAP
o
o o
o
CANADA
ND
SD
NE
MN
IA
KS MO
IL
IN OH
MI
WI
MT
WY
CO
PA
NY
ZONES LEGEND TEMP. MIN.
3
4
FOLLOWS: AS LOCATED, IS SITE PROJECT THE WHERE ZONEMINNESOTA
THE IN HARDINESS FOR ACCEPTABILITY DOCUMENT STOCK, PLANT ALLFOR
SHOWN. LIMITS ACCEPTABLE THE WITHINYEARS
TWO LAST THE LEAST AT FOR GROWN CONTINUOUSLY STOCKPLANTA.
OR
SHOWN. LIMITS ACCEPTABLE THE FROMORIGINATING
STOCK GRAFT AND ROOT OR SOURCE SEED HAVINGLIMITS,
RANGE GROWING ACCEPTABLE THE OUTSIDE GROWN STOCK,LANTPB.
(MnDOT 3861.2C)
-34.4 TO -40 F
-28.9 TO -34.4 F
o o -26.1 TO -28.9 F5a
QUEBEC
ONTARIO
SASKATCHEWAN
MANITOBA
LAKE
L A K
E
L
A
K
E
LAKE
LAKE
SUPERIOR
M
I C
H
I G
A
N
H
U
R
O
N
ERIE
ONTANO
3
4
5a
5b
4
3
4
2
5a
ZONES LEGEND
ACCEPTABLE ZONES
UNACCEPTABLE ZONES
2
1
1 0
L A K E
W
I N
N
I P E G BAY
HUDSON
6
6
5b5b
5b and 6
0, 1, 2,
3
4
CUT
PRUNING
CORRECT
CLOSE
TOO
LONG
TOO
SLANTED
TOO
PRUNING
BRANCHES PRUNED TO LIVE BUD
BRANCHES PRUNED AT TRUNK
B B
C C
D
D
X
(SHIGO METHOD)
LIVE BUD
BRANCH COLLAR
A A
RIDGE
BRANCH BARK
BRANCH
DEAD
:SAW
PRUNING WITH PRUNING TOSTEPS
A. POINT ATBRANCH
THE THROUGH WAY PARTCUT1.
A. TO B POINT FROMBRANCH
THROUGH COMPLETELYCUT2.
D. TO CPOINT
FROM CUT COLLARBRANCH AT3.
GROWTH. OF SEASON ONEAFTER
FORMATION CALLUSDISCONTINUOUS
IN RESULT WILL CLOSE)(TOO
X TO C POINTFROM CUTINCORRECT
GROWTH.
OF SEASON ONE AFTERFORMATION
CALLUS SHAPEDDOUGHNUT
CONTINUOUS IN RESULTWILL
) A TO B POINT FROM STUB THE
T NO BUT COLLAR BRANCH(LEAVING
D TO C POINTFROM CUTCORRECT
: NOTESPRUNING
SAW. PRUNINGOR
PRUNERTYPE-ISSORC SSHARP
AND CLEAN USINGPRUNE1.
SPRING.EARLY
OR SEASON DORMANTLATE
IS PRUNE TO TIME BESTTHE2.
JULY. OR JUNEMAY,
APRIL, IN OAKS PRUNINGAVOID3.
SHELLAC. OR PAINTLATEX
WITH WOUND ORSURFACE
CUT PAINT IMMEDIATELYJULY,
OR JUNE MAY, APRIL, INTREES
OAK TO OCCUR WOUNDSIF
OR NECESSARY IS PRUNINGIF4.
LIVE BRANCH
(MnDOT 2571.3E.1 and 2571.3K.2.a(9))
REVISED - JANUARY / 01 / 2014
NOTESGENERAL
REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT SPECIFIC FOR PROVISIONS SPECIALSEE
REQUIREMENTS.GENERAL
FOR PROJECTS," LANDSCAPE MnDOT FOR MANUAL ADMINISTRATIONCONTRACT
AND "INSPECTION CURRENT THE AND 3861, 2571, SPECIFICATIONS MnDOT TOREFER
OPERATIONS. PLANTING INITIAL STARTING BEFORE WORK PREPARATORYCOMPLETE
PLANTING. TO PRIOR 3861) (MnDOT WITH ACCORDANCE IN STOCK PLANT ALLACCEPT
2571.3D.2) (MnDOT WITH ACCORDANCE INOPERATIONS
CULTIVATION SOIL FOR COMPETENCY DEMONSTRATE WILL CONTRACTORTHE
2571.3F1) (MnDOT WITH ACCORDANCE INOPERATIONS
INSTALLATION PLANT ALL FOR COMPETENCY DEMONSTRATE WILL CONTRACTORTHE
PROTECTION
RODENT
3)
OF (3 DETAILS PLANTING STANDARD AND PROVISIONS SPECIALSEE
FERTILIZER PROVISIONS SPECIALSEE
COMPOST SPECIFIED. OTHERWISE UNLESS 2 GRADE 3890MnDOT
MATERIAL
MULCH
SPECIFIED. OTHERWISE UNLESS 6 TYPE 3882MnDOT
BEDS
PLANTING
MASS
3) OF (3 DETAILS PLANTING STANDARDSEE
BED. PLANTING MASS ENTIRE MULCH IMMEDIATELY.DEFICIENCY
OR SURPLUS QUANTITY PLANT GROSS OF ENGINEERNOTIFY
SHRUB. THE OF CENTER THE TO TREE THE OF CENTERTHE
FROM MEASURED BE WILL RADIUS TREE. CONIFER EACHAROUND
RADIUS CLEAR 8' AND TREE DECIDUOUS EACH AROUNDSHRUBS
OF CLEAR RADIUS 5' PROVIDE OTHERWISE. SPECIFIEDUNLESS
SPACING, TRIANGULAR USE PLANTS. REMAINING WITH INFILL
UNIFORMLY THEN FIRST, PERIMETER THE ON ROWSSTAGGERED
IN BEDS PLANT SHEETS. ON SPECIFIED OTHERWISE UNLESSLESS,
OR 15' AT PLACED PLANTS FOR BEDS PLANTING MASSPREPARE
PREVENTION)
CRACK
(FROST
PAINTING
TREE
BRANCH. MAJORFIRST
TO LINE GROUND FROM CIRCUMFERENCE TREE PAINTACCEPTABLE.
IS PAINT LATEX WHITE EXTERIOR UNDILUTED ONLYASH.
MOUNTAIN AND CRABAPPLE MAPLE, LOCUST, LINDEN, OAK,PAINT
DIMENSIONS
PLANPLANTING
PLAN. FROM SCALING SUPERCEDE DIMENSIONSSTATED
2
5
7
1 .
3
G
)
(
M
n
D
O
T
G
U
I D
E
L
I N
E
S
W
A
T
E
R
I N
G
TYPEPLANT APPLICATION PERWATER
OF GALLONSAVERAGE
TREES
TRANSPLANTEDMACHINE
50-100
TREES
BURLAPPED ANDBALLED 20
TREES
CONTAINER AND ROOTBARE
15
SHRUBS
BURLAPPED ANDBALLED 10
SHRUBS
CONTAINER AND ROOTBARE
7
SEEDLINGSWOODY 4
VINES ANDPERENNIALS 3
REQUIREMENTS.
NOT GUIDELINES, ARE ABOVE LISTED AMOUNTS THELEVELS.
EXCESSIVE NOT BUT ADEQUATE AT MOISTURE SOILMAINTAIN
AND MONITOR TO RESPONSIBILITY CONTRACTOR'S THE ISIT
2015
15'
PROJECT LOCATION
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIPDAVID LARSON
DATE PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (B)
9STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
A
B
1 2
"
A
B B
A
18"C
INSTALLATION OF PLANTS
BALLED & BURLAPPED STOCK
PLANTING. TO PRIOR HOURS 24 THAN MORENOT
BUT HOUR ONE LEAST AT FOR WATER IN ROOTSSOAK1.
HOLE. OF BOTTOM AND SIDESSCARIFY2.
.ROOTS
AND TOP THE OF PRUNING CORRECTIVE WITHPROCEED3.
SOIL. PLANTING WITH BACKFILLIMMEDIATELY
AND PLUMB EVENLY. OUT ROOTS SPREADELEVATION.
SOIL FINISHED THE AT IS FLARE ROOT THE SOPLANT
SET HOLE. TO WATER FROM DIRECTLY PLANTTRANSFER4.
VOIDS. FILL ANDPLANTS
SETTLETO HOURS 2 WITHIN THOROUGHLYWATER5.
TIME. SECOND A WATER AND VOIDS FILLBACK6.
EXCESSIVE. IS MOISTURE SOIL UNLESSWATERING
SECOND THE OF HOURS 48 WITHIN MULCHPLACE7.
BARE ROOT STOCK
HOLE. OF BOTTOM AND SIDESSCARIFY1.
. ROOT AND TOP OF PRUNING CORRECTIVE WITHPROCEED2.
ROOTS.LINGD GIR STEM CORRECT ORREMOVE
ROOTS. FIBROUS CIRCLING PREVENT AND REDIRECTTO
MASS SOIL OF OUTSIDE SCORE AND CONTAINERREMOVE3.
GRADE. FINISHED THE ABOVE 2"TO
UP OR AT IS FLARE ROOT THE OF TOP THE SOPLANT
INSTALL SOIL. PLANTING COMPACTEDTHOROUGHLY
OR SOIL NATIVE UNDISTURBED ON PLANTSET4.
SOIL. PLANTING WITH BACKFILL ANDPLUMB5.
VOIDS. FILLAND
PLANT SETTLETO HOURS 2 WITHIN THOROUGHLYWATER6.
TIME. SECOND A WATER AND VOIDS FILLBACK7.
EXCESSIVE. IS MOISTURE SOIL UNLESSWATERING
SECOND THE OF HOURS 48 WITHIN MULCHPLACE8.
CONTAINER STOCK
MACHINE MOVED STOCK
HOLE. OF BOTTOM AND SIDESSCARIFY1.
PRUNING. CORRECTIVE WITHPROCEED2.
GROWN. PREVIOUSLY
WAS IT AS DEPTH SAME AT SOIL NATIVE ON PLANTSET3.
SOIL. PLANTING WITH BACKFILL ANDPLUMB4.
12". OF DEPTH MINIMUM A AND 18"OF
DISTANCE MINIMUM A TO BALLROOT THE TOADJACENT
IMMEDIATELY SOIL THE LOOSEN PLANTING,AFTER5.
VOIDS. FILLAND
PLANT SETTLETO HOURS 2 WITHIN THOROUGHLYWATER6.
TIME. SECOND A WATER AND VOIDS FILLBACK7.
EXCESSIVE. IS MOISTURE SOIL UNLESSWATERING
SECOND THE OF HOURS 48 WITHIN MULCHPLACE8.
(MnDOT 2571.3F)
M
I N
.
REQUIREMENTS SIZE SPADE TREEMINIMUM
HOLE. OF BOTTOM AND SIDESSCARIFY1.
PRUNING. CORRECTIVE WITHPROCEED2.
INTACT. USED), (IF BASKET, WIRE AND BURLAPWITH
GRADE FINISHED THE ABOVE 2" TO UP OR AT ISFLARE
ROOT THE SO PLANTPLACE SOIL. PLANTINGCOMPACTED
THOROUGHLY OR SOIL NATIVE UNDISTURBED ON PLANTSET3.
INTERVALS. 6" AT BURLAP TREATED REMAININGSLIT4.
PLANT. WATER THEN ROOTBALL,THE
OF TOP THE OF 12" APPROXIMATELY WITHIN TOBACKFILL5.
ROOTS.
RDLING GI STEM CORRECT OR REMOVE TWINE. ALLREMOVE
BALL. THE OF 1/3 TOP THE FROM NAILS ANDBURLAP
ALL REMOVE GREATER. IS WHICHEVER RINGSHORIZONTAL
TWO TOP THE OR BASKET THE OF 1/3 TOP THEREMOVE6.
SOIL. PLANTING WITH BACKFILL ANDPLUMB7.
VOIDS. FILLAND
PLANTS SETTLE TO HOURS 2 WITHIN THOROUGHLYWATER8.
TIME. SECOND A WATER AND VOIDS FILLBACK9.
EXCESSIVE. IS MOISTURE SOILUNLESS
WATERING SECOND THE OF HOURS 48 WITHIN MULCHPLACE10.
SIZEDIAMETER
SPADE(C)
CALIPER
TREE,OAK
RTREE,CALIPE
LORNAMENTA
/DECIDUOUS
HEIGHTTREE,
CONIFEROUS
42"
60"
78"
85"
1.5" to1"
2.5" to1.5"
3.5" to2.5"
5" to3.5"
3" to2"
4" to3"
6" to4"
8" to6"
7' to5'
9' to7'
14' to9'
18' to14'
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAIL (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAIL (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
SOIL
LOOSENED
DIMENSIONS HOLEPLANTING
BALL. SOIL OF BOTTOM TOFLAIR
ROOT FROM MEASUREMENT EXCEED NOT SHALL PLANTS CONTAINER AND B&B FOR DEPTHHOLE
TYPEPLANT
INCLUDINGAND
TO UP SIZEPLANT
WIDTH
HOLE MINIMUM(A)
DEPTHHOLE
APPROXIMATE(B)
TREES
ORNAMENTAL
&DECIDUOUS
B.R.3'46"13"
B.R4'46"14"
B.R.5'48"14"
B.R.6'54"15"
B.R7'60"16"
B.R.8'66"19"
B.R.0.75"48'12"
B.R.1"54"14"
B.R.1.25"60"14"
B.R.1.5 66"15"
B.R1.75"72"16"
B.R.2"84"19"
B.B.4'42"11"
B.B.5'48"12"
B.B.6'52"14"
B.B.8'66"16"
B.B.10'66"16"
B.B.12'48"16"
B.B.1"54"14"
B.B.1.25"56"15"
B.B.1.5"61"15"
B.B.1.75"66"16"
B.B.2"72"16"
B.B.2.5"84"19"
B.B.3"96"20"
B.B.3.5"114"23"
B.B.4"126"25"
PERENNIALSAND
ROSESSHRUBS,
DECIDUOUS
B.R.12"24"7"
B.R.15"28"8"
B.R.18"30"8"
B.R.2'33"9"
B.R.3'42"11"
B.B.4'48"12"
TRENCH.CONTINUOUS
A INSPACING
ON-CENTERUPON
BASED BESHALL
WIDTH ANDDEPTH
HOLEPERENNIAL
B.R.5'54"14"
B.R.6'60"14"
B.B.18"27"7"
B.B.2'30"8"
B.B.3'36"9"
B.B.4'42"11"
B.B.5'48"12"
B.B.6'54"14"
2
2
2
'2
11
'
4 1
8
3 / 5 x HEIGHT
3 x
(MnDOT 2571.3H)
'
8 7
0
'
MULCH
SPACING FROM TRUNK
+3 X
+1 X
MULCH AREA CALCULATOR
PLANT OFTYPE PLANT PER FT.SQ.
TREESCONIFEROUS 2
TREESORNAMENTAL
ANDDECIDUOUS
GRASSORNAMENTAL
PERENNIALS,
BUSHS,ROSE
SHRUBS,DECIDUOUS
ANDCONIFEROUS
SPACING xSPACING
VINES 2 xSPACING
2
= 3.1416
SPADE DIAMETER
TREES OR SHRUBS
MACHINE-MOVED
CONIFEROUS TREE (RADIUS+3' min.)
DECIDUOUS TREE (3' min.)
DECIDUOUS SHRUB (3'min.)
CONIFEROUS AND
TRANSPLANT (RADIUS+2' min.)
M
A
X
6
"
H
E
I G
H
T
.TEMS MAIN ORTRUNK
THE AT SHRUBSAND
S TREE FROM 6" THANMORE
NO AND 3" THANLESS
NO BACK MULCHPULL1.
DEPTH.3"
MINIMUM A ATMAINTAINED
IS DEPTH MULCHTHE
IF PERIOD ESTABLISHED THE
THROUGHOUTACCEPTABLE
IS MULCHDETERIORATING
ORSUBSIDING2.
DEPTH.MAXIMUM
6" THE EXCEEDNOT
DO; DEPTHMINIMUM 3" THE
BELOWWHEN MULCH ADD3.
REPLACED. ANDREMOVED
BE MUST SOILWITH
CONTAMINATEDMULCH4.
'8
72'8
72
INSTALLATION OF VINES
TO RIGHT
ROOT STOCK DETAILS
TO APPLICABLE
PLANT ACCORDING
NOTE:
CHAIN-LINK FENCE
INPLACE WALL
BIODEGRADABLE STRING
LATH WITH
FASTEN LOOSELY TO
OR FENCE
AGAINST THE WALL
TOP RESTS SNUGLEY
AT AN ANGLE SO THE
DRIVEN 12" INTO SOIL
1" x 36" WOOD LATH
VINE
5' BEYOND TERMINAL
BETWEEN VINES AND
MULCH CONTINUOUSLY
MIN. 2'-0"MIN. 2'-0"
REVISED - JANUARY / 01 / 2014
DIMENSIONS HOLEPLANTING
BALL. SOIL OF BOTTOM TOFLAIR
ROOT FROM MEASUREMENT EXCEED NOT SHALL PLANTS CONTAINER AND B&B FOR DEPTHHOLE
TYPEPLANT INCLUDINGAND
TO UP SIZEPLANT
WIDTH
HOLE MINIMUM(A)
DEPTHHOLE
APPROXIMATE(B)
TREES
CONIFEROUS
B.B2'36"10"
B.B3'42"11"
B.B4'51"13"
BUDSTERMINAL
CONTAINWILL
BRANCHESCONIFER
ALL OF 2/3 LEASTAT
B.B5'60"13"
B.B6'66"15"
B.B7'72"16"
B.B8'81"18"
B.B9'90"20"
B.B10'102"21"
B.B12'114"24"
SHRUBS
CONIFEROUS B.B.18"24"7"
B.B.3'48"12"
(UPRIGHT)
SHRUBS
CONIFEROUS B.B. SPR18"30"8"
B.B. SPR2'36"9"
(SPREADING)
PLANTSGROWN
CONTAINER
PLUGS /CELLPACKS 6"2.5"
CONT.2.25"7"3"
CONT.3.5"10"3"
CONT.4"11"4"
CONT.4.5"13"4"
CONT. QT6"/1 15"5.5"
CONT.1#18"6"
CONT.2#23"7.5"
CONT.3#29"8.5"
CONT.5#30"11"
CONT.7#37"11"
CONT.15#44"14"
CONT.10#45"15"
CONT.20#60"16"
CONT.25#72"17"
SEEDLINGS
SEEDLING6"15"14"
SEEDLING9"18"14"
SEEDLING12"23"16"
SEEDLING18"30"16"
SEEDLING2'36"18"
VINES
B.R. MED YR.1 15"11"
B.R. 1 NO. YR.1 17"14'
B.R. MED. YR.2 33"12"
B.R. 1 NO. YR.2 42"15"
WALL INSTALLATION FENCE INSTALLATION
PLANTING DETAILS (1 0f 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIPDAVID LARSON
DATE PRINTED:PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN BY
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-1899
M IN NESO
TA
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
OF TRANSPOR
T
A
T
I
O
N
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
ENV. PLANNING AND DESIGN UNIT
SHEET NO.OF SHEETS10
STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (C)
10STATE PROJECT SP 6205-969 (T.H. 10)
'2
10'8
51
PLANT SPACING IN MASS BEDS
CHART ON STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (2 OF 3)
MINIMUMS FROM THE PLANTING HOLE DIMENSIONS
HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
(2 OF 3)
PLANTING DETAIL
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
8' FOR CONIFEROUS TREES
5' FOR DECIDUOUS TREES
GRANULAR FILTER
TILE DRAINAGE
MINI-BERM
APPROVAL.ENGINEER
TO SUBJECT CONTRACTOR, THE BY DETERMINED ARE USE TO TYPEWHICH
AND SOILS DRAINED POORLY FOR DETAILS PLANTING USING FOR NEEDTHE1.
NOTE:
M
A
S
S
R
O
O
T
1 /4
GRADE.FINISHED
THAN HIGHER 1"-3" MASS ROOT OF TOP THE PLACING ALLOW TO BED OR HOLEEXCAVATE1.
SUBSOIL. DRAIN ADEQUATELY TOLAYER
SOIL PAN HARD DRAINED POORLY OR IMPERVIOUS THROUGH ENTIRELY HOLES DIAMETER 8"AUGER2.
DRAINAGE.
POSITIVE FOR NECESSARY IF 8" ADDITIONAL AN RE-AUGER DRAINAGE. POSITIVE FORTEST3.
SOIL. INPLACE 50%AND
SAND 50% OF MIXTURE INCORPORATED UNIFORM A WITH HOLES AUGER BACKFILLTHOROUGHLY4.
3). OF (2 DETAILS PLANTING STANDARD SEE TYPE.ROOT TO ACCORDING PLANTINGCOMPLETE5.
PLANTING DETAIL FOR POORLY DRAINED SOILS
(MnDOT 2571.3D.2(8))
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAIL (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
HOLES
8" AUGER
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAIL (1 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
TILE
4" DRAIN
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
PLANTING DETAIL (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
GRADE.FINISHED
THAN HIGHER 1"-3" MASS ROOT THE OF TOP THE PLACING ALLOW TO BED OR HOLEEXCAVATE1.
GRADE. LOWER A AT DAYLIGHTING TILE DRAIN DIAMETER MINIMUM 4"INSTALL2.
). 3 OF (2 DETAILS PLANTING STANDARD SEE TYPE.ROOT TO ACCORDING PLANTINGCOMPLETE3.
MASS. ROOT THE OF DEPTH THE 1/4 BED OR HOLEEXCAVATE1.
HOLE. IN MASS ROOTSET2.
HEIGHT. BERMTHE
TIMES 3 OF WIDTH A TO BASE BERM THE EXTEND. SOILPLANTING WITH BERMCONSTRUCT3.
3). OF (2 DETAILS PLANTING STANDARD SEE TYPE.ROOT ACCORDING PLANTINGCOMPLETE4.
PLANTING ON SLOPES
PLANTING DETAIL (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD
FOR MULCH DETAIL
HOLD WATER IN BASIN.
SOIL RIDGE TO
WATER BASIN
DOWN HILL HALF
DETAILS (2 OF 3)
SEE STANDARD PLANTING
ROOT TYPE.
PLANT ACCORDING TO
PLANTING DETAILS (1 OF 3)
DETAIL SEE STANDARD
FOR PLANTING SOIL
WATER BASIN
UPHILL HALF
NOTE:
BASIN. WATERING THE OF HALF UPHILLTHE
CONSTRUCT NOT DO GREATER, OR SLOPES 1:2ON1.
EXISTING GRADE
CUT AREA
"
8
7
2
'
-
0
1 '
-
0
"
"4
31'-5
1 '
-
9
"
1 '
-
0
"
SEEDLING TREE SHELTER
(MnDOT 2571.3I.4)
PREVAILING WIND
NETTING
TUBE SHELTER
PERFORATION
LASER LINE
(LENGTH VARIES)
STAKE
RECESS
FORMED TUBE
SECURE STAKE IN
CABLE-TIE TO
2
'
-
0
"
M
I N
.
1 2
"
T
O
1 4
"
RIM. TOPOUTWARD-FLARED
AN ANDPERFORATION
LINE LASER A WITHTUBES
POLYPROPYLENETRANSLUCENT
SEMI AND RIGIDTWIN-WALL,
EXTRUDED, SEAMLESS,USE1.
TWISTING.
OR DISLODGINGPREVENT
TO STAKE OAK WHITE 1''x
1'' A TO ATTACHEDCABLE-TIES
NYLON WITH SHELTERSECURE2.
ROOTS. TREE THEDISTURBING
WITHOUT SURFACE SOILTHE
BELOW 1'' OF MINIMUM ATUBE
THE OF BOTTOM THEEMBED3.
SHOWN. AS DOWNNETTING
PULL TUBE. THE OFTOP
THE OVER SLEEVE ANDCOVER
NETTINGPHOTODEGRADABLE
PLASTIC APLACE4.
RODENT PROTECTION
15"
(MnDOT 2571.3I.2)
2". END CUT THE OVERLAPCLOTH).
(HARDWARE MESH WIRE WELDED GALVANIZED GRID 0.25" USING CYLINDER DOUBLE-LAYERED AFORM1.
STEM. TREE THE OFCENTER
THE FROM 7" GROUND, THE INTO STAKES OAK WHITE HEARTWOOD OPPOSING 1" x 1" TWODRIVE2.
OVERLAP. THE ALONG CENTER ON 4" APPROXIMATELY SPACE OVERLAP. THE ALONG-TIESCABLE OR
WASHERS AND SCREWS EITHER, USING STAKES THE OF OUTSIDE THE TO CYLINDER MESH THESECURE3.
WASHERS. WITH LONG 3/4" x DIA. 1/8" GALVANIZED HEAD ROUND BE SHALLSCREWSa.
OR
.STRENGTH
TENSILE 120LB TO 75LB BETWEEN AND LONG 8" LEAST AT, NYLON BE SHALLTIES-CABLEb.
ROOTS. TREETHE
DISTURBING WITHOUT SURFACE SOIL THE BELOW 1" CYLINDER MESH THE OF EDGE LOWER THEEMBED4.
CYLINDER. THE OF TOPTHE
WITH FLUSH BE WILL STAKE CYLINDER. THE OF TOP THE AT PERMITTED BE NOT WILL EDGESCUT5.
DETAIL. PLACEMENT MULCH IN SPECIFIED ASTRUNK
THE FROM BACK PULLED BE SHALL AND DEPTH 3" EXCEED NOT SHALL CYLINDER THE WITHINMULCH6.
GUARDS. RODENT HEIGHT MIN. 12" OFINSTALLATION
PERMIT TO REMOVED BE TO HAVE MAY BRANCHES LARCH AND PINE OF WHORL BOTTOMTHE7.
TREES. SPRUCE ONPLACE NOT DO TREES, LARCH AND PINE DECIDUOUS, ALL ONINSTALL8.
CONIFEROUS TREES
12" MIN. HT. FOR
DECIDUOUS TREES
24" MIN. HT. FOR
WIRE MESH
STAKE
'
8 1
4
'
2 1
4
'
2 1
2
'
8
3
2
SIZING POSTSTEEL
CALIPER TYPE POSTSTEEL A B C D
INCHES
4THAN
LESS
EQUAL.APPROVED
OR 3403) (Mn/DOTPOST
FENCE STEELHOT-ROLLED
7'-0"MIN.
3'-0"4'-0"3'-0"
INCHES
4THAN
GREATER
EQUAL. APPROVED OR3401)
(Mn/DOT POST SIGNCHANNEL
FLANGED LB. 2.210',
10'-0"MIN.
4'-0"6'-0"5'-0"
STAKING AND GUYING
(MnDOT 2571.3I.1)
10 ga WIRE.
STRAPS. ATTACH WITH
THICK AND 1.5" WIDE
POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL.
POLYROPYLENE OR
16" LONG
SEE CHART
FENCE POST
HOT-ROLLED STEEL
SLOPE.
GROUND OFREGARDLESS
PLUMB DRIVE BALL.ROOT
OF OUTSIDE PLACEWIRES.
GUY RETAIN TO DRILLEDOR
NOTCHED BE TO POSTSTEELS1.
APPROVED.BE
NOT WILL SYSTEMSGUYING
WIRE AND HOSERUBBER
SUBSTITUTE TOREQUESTS2.
YEAR. ONEWITHIN REMOVE4.
BY THE ENGINEER.
PROBLEM, OR AS DIRECTED
WIND CONDITIONS ARE A
WHERE VANDALISM, SOIL, OR
TREES IN A PLUMB CONDITION
OR NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN
REQUIRED UNLESS SPECIFIED
3. TREE STAKING IS NOT
D
C
A
B
REVISED - JANUARY / 01 / 2014
Page 1 of 1
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Susan Iverson, Acting City Administrator
FROM: John Anderson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Johanna Marsh Tennis Court
Action Requested
Provide staff with feedback on court rehabilitation process.
Background
Rehabilitation of the Johanna Marsh Tennis court is programed for 2017 in the current Capital
Improvement Plan. This court is showing signs of major settlement and shifting in the pavement
surface. The Parks Trails and Recreation Committee indicated to the City Council that
rehabilitation of this court was identified as a priority and had recommended a survey of the
neighborhood be done to get public input. The City Council commented they would like to
discuss the item before a survey is done. Staff has received comments from residents concerning
the schedule for repairs, copies of those emails are attached.
With the general condition of the court it is possible we should be considering closing the court
to use as there could be some liability from tripping hazards on the court. In order to insure
appropriate corrections are budgeted and designed soil borings should be taken to determine the
pavement section needed in a reconstruction
Attachments
Attachment A: CIP detail sheet
Attachment B: Photos of court condition
Attachment C: Correspondence from residents
AGENDA ITEM – 1K
MEMORANDUM
Johanna Marsh Tennis Court – 2016
Sara Grant A't'tachment C
From: John Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 10:50 AM
To: Sara Grant
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
From: Julie Hanson
Sent:Thursday, November 12, 2015 9:46 AM
To: John Anderson
Cc: Sherri Eisenbraun; Amy Dietl; Sue Iverson; *AHCouncil
Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Hi John,
With Sara being out today and tomorrow, could you please respond to the below concern? Thank you!
Julie
Jz,N
Deputy Clerk I City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96 1 Arden Hills, MN 55112
651-792-7830 direct 1651-792-7800 main 1651-634-5137 fax
ihanson@cityofardenhilis.org
From:nnoreply civicplus.com [mailto:noreplvt-civicplus.coml
Sent:Thursday, November 12, 2015 9:18 AM
To:AHlnformation<AHInfo2metro-inet.us>
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Report a Concern
Please complete the online form below to submit your concern.
Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Address 1 Edgewater Ave.
Address2 Field not completed.
City Arden Hills
i
State MN
Zip 55112
Home Phone Number
Cell Phone Number
Daytime Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Please Specify General There is a city tennis court in our area that is in disrepair. My
Inquiry, Request for kid use the court on a regular basis for tennis, soccer and
Service or Concern. lacrosse. We really love having the court and a backboard
would also be a great addition. I heard that it was slated for
resurfacing, but needs more than that. I understand that the
City is considering a major overhaul of the court. My family and
many of those around us would greatly appreciate an improved
court. thank you for your consideration.
Email not displaying correctly?View it in your browser.
2
Sara Grant
From: Julie Hanson
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:10 PM
To: Sara Grant
Cc: John Anderson; Sherri Eisenbraun; Amy Dietl; Sue Iverson; *AHCouncil
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Hello Sara,
Could you please reply to the below concern? Thank you!
Julie
1-1a1111 -
Deputy
1a1111
Deputy Clerk I City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96 1 Arden Hills, MN 55112
651-792-7830 direct 1651-792-7800 main 1651-634-5137 fax
ihanson@cityofardenhiils,org
From: r)ore:)Iy„ civicpltjs.con_i [in ai[to:no reply@ civic l us.corn]
Sent:Thursday, October 22, 2015 12:52 PM
To: AHlnformation<AHinfo nmetro-inet,us>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Report a Concern
Please complete the online form below to submit your concern.
Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Addressl Ridgewood Road
Addressl Field not completed.
City St Paul
State M N
Zip 55112=3650
Home Phone Number
Cell Phone Number Field not completed.
1
Daytime Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Please Specify General I am writing to express my deep concern over the future status
Inquiry, Request for of tennis court at Johanna Marsh. As the president of our
Service or Concern. neighborhood association, Arden Hills#3, comprised of
approximately 60 homes), I called and spoke with Sarah at the
city in August about the status of the court and was told there
was a bid out for resurfacing it but that depending on the
responses, it may not happen yet this summer. As I now
understand it the maintenance work has been shifted to next
summer. Many kids and adults utilize this court every year and
several kids from the neighborhood have gone on to play
tennis for our Mounds View schools. Please, know that the
tennis court is a highly valuable asset that our community uses
and appreciates. It was a priority during the street
reconstruction so much so that the community advocated to not
give it up to storm water management space and instead
agreed to maintain other rain gardens to retain the court. It is
part of our neighborhood's history, identity and culture (we
have had weekly summer tennis lessons for kids offered every
summer for nearly ten years now, provided by a resident that is
also a high school tennis coach). The court is a focal point that
brings our neighborhood together for fun, fitness, and
community. Please, do all that you can to respect our
community and help us retain this incredible asset. Thank you
for your time and consideration, President,
Arden Hills Association#3
Email not displaying correctly?View it in your browser,
2
Sara Grant
From: Julie Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 8:20 AM
To: Sara Grant
Cc: John Anderson; Amy Dietl; Sherri Eisenbraun; Sue Iverson; *AHCouncil
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Hi Sara,
Here's another one regarding the same concern. Please reply to the resident. Thanks!
Julie
1-"kla-41
Deputy Clerk I City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96 1 Arden Hills, MN 55112
651-792-7830 direct 1651-792-7800 main 1 651-634-5137 fax
ihanson@cityofarderihiils.org
From: pore lypcivicplus.com [ ailto:noreply civic lus.coml
Sent:Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:12 PM
To: AHlnformation<AHlrfo metro-inet.us>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Report a Concern
Please complete the online form below to submit your concern.
Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Address Asbury Street
Address2 Field not completed.
City Arden Hills
State MN
Zip 55112
Home Phone Number
Cell Phone Number Field not completed,
I.
Daytime Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Please Specify General My daughter broke her wrist on the tennis court in our
Inquiry, Request for neighborhood because it hasn't been resurfaced. It was
Service or Concern. supposed to be resurfaced 2 years ago, but the company that
was hired never showed up. Now the costs to resurface it have
gone up and it sounds like the city is putting off resurfacing it.
The residents in Arden Hills No 3 Association would like the
Arden Hills Staff and City Council to know that we are very
concerned about our tennis court. We want to make sure it gets
repaired next year. This tennis court is an important part of our
community and we feel it is the city's responsibility to make
sure that it is in good working order.
Email not displaying correctly? +liew'it to aur browser:
2
Sara Grant
From: Julie Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 8:15 AM
To: Sara Grant
Cc: John Anderson; Amy Dietl; Sherri Eisenbraun; Sue Iverson; Brenda Holden; Dave McClung;
David Grant; Fran Holmes
Subject:FW: Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Hi Sara,
Could you please reply to the below reported concern? Thank you!
Julie
Deputy Clerk I City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96 1 Arden Hills, MN 55112
651-792-7830 direct 1651-792-7800 main 1651-634-5137 fax
jliansonC cityofardenhlls.or
From:noreplyeei(mai Ito:norep(y@civic0lus.coml
Sent:Tuesday, October 20,2015 4:50 PM
To:AHinformation<AHlnfo@)metro-inet.us>
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Report a Concern
Report a Concern
Please complete the online form below to submit your concern.
Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Addressl Glenhill Rd
Addressl Field not completed.
City Arden Hills
State MN
Zip 65112
Home Phone Number
i
Cell Phone Number Field not completed.
Daytime Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address
Please Specify General The residents in Arden Hills No 3 Association would like the
Inquiry,Request for Arden Hills Staff and City Council to know that we are very
Service or Concern. concerned about our tennis court. We want to make sure it gets
repaired next year if possible. We had been informed that our
tennis court would be re-surfaced but this has not happened
yet. It sounds like the project is more work than anticipated and
now will be more expensive to repair but we feel this is an
important part of our community. One of our residents has
generously given free tennis lessons to our kids throughout the
years and many of us enjoy the use of this space. We would
enjoy it even more if there was a backboard available to
practice as well.
Email not displaying correctly?yigw it in your browser.
2
AGENDA ITEM – 1L
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sue Iverson, Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance and Admin Services
SUBJECT: Discussion of Trail Priorities
Background/Discussion
Mayor Grant asked that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion.
AGENDA ITEM – 1M
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 16, 2016
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sue Iverson, Interim City Administrator/Director of Finance and Admin Services
SUBJECT: Personnel Committee Discussion
Background/Discussion
The Personnel Committee will have a discussion with the full City Council on personnel items.