Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-13-17-R
APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Public inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. STAFF COMMENTS Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) And Joint Development Authority (JDA) Update William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 30, 2017 Special City Council Work Session 01 -30 -17 -SWS.PDF February 13, 2017 Regular City Council 02 -13 -17 -R.PDF February 21, 2017 City Council Work Session 02 -21 -17 -WS.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Public Works Superintendent William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Customer Service Specialist William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve PC 2017 -002 - Boston Scientific Site Plan Review Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2017 -007 Approving Amendments To MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, And Abatement Contract For Land O ’ Lakes Project Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve City Properties Appraisal Services Proposal Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Bid From Valley -Rich Co. For Storm Sewer Manhole Repair At 1156 Amble Drive Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of An Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Accept Proposal For Engineering Services From WSB & Associates For The 2017 Trail And Watermain Projects Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of A 2018 Mack Chassis And Towmaster Dump Truck Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Final Payment #12 To Meyer Contracting, Inc., For The Round Lake Road Improvements Project Sue Polka, Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Under this Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. Please be sure to complete a "Request to Appear before City Council" form (available at the back table). Completed forms may be given to the City Clerk. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity For Residents Mayor Grant MEMO.PDF Resolution 2017 -008 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments For Delinquent Utilities Dave Perrault, Finance Analyst Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Resolution 2017 -006 Vacating Drainage Easement –Boston Scientific -4100 Hamline Avenue North (PC 2017 -005) Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal From WSB & Associates To Complete The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Dave McClung Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Steve Scott Regular City Council Agenda March 13, 2017 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 3.A. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 4.B. Documents: 4.C. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 5.D. Documents: 5.E. Documents: 5.F. Documents: 5.G. Documents: 5.H. Documents: 5.I. Documents: 5.J. Documents: 5.K. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSRice Creek Commons (TCAAP) And Joint Development Authority (JDA) UpdateWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 30, 2017 Special City Council Work Session01-30 -17 -SWS.PDFFebruary 13, 2017 Regular City Council 02 -13 -17 -R.PDF February 21, 2017 City Council Work Session 02 -21 -17 -WS.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Public Works Superintendent William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Customer Service Specialist William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve PC 2017 -002 - Boston Scientific Site Plan Review Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2017 -007 Approving Amendments To MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, And Abatement Contract For Land O ’ Lakes Project Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve City Properties Appraisal Services Proposal Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Bid From Valley -Rich Co. For Storm Sewer Manhole Repair At 1156 Amble Drive Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of An Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Accept Proposal For Engineering Services From WSB & Associates For The 2017 Trail And Watermain Projects Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of A 2018 Mack Chassis And Towmaster Dump Truck Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Final Payment #12 To Meyer Contracting, Inc., For The Round Lake Road Improvements Project Sue Polka, Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Under this Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. Please be sure to complete a "Request to Appear before City Council" form (available at the back table). Completed forms may be given to the City Clerk. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity For Residents Mayor Grant MEMO.PDF Resolution 2017 -008 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments For Delinquent Utilities Dave Perrault, Finance Analyst Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Resolution 2017 -006 Vacating Drainage Easement –Boston Scientific -4100 Hamline Avenue North (PC 2017 -005) Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal From WSB & Associates To Complete The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Dave McClungBrenda Holden Fran HolmesSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaMarch 13, 20177:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents: 4.C. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 5.D. Documents: 5.E. Documents: 5.F. Documents: 5.G. Documents: 5.H. Documents: 5.I. Documents: 5.J. Documents: 5.K. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSRice Creek Commons (TCAAP) And Joint Development Authority (JDA) UpdateWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 30, 2017 Special City Council Work Session01-30 -17 -SWS.PDFFebruary 13, 2017 Regular City Council02-13 -17 -R.PDFFebruary 21, 2017 City Council Work Session02-21 -17 -WS.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative ServicesAshley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Public Works SuperintendentWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Customer Service SpecialistWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve PC 2017 -002 - Boston Scientific Site Plan ReviewMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2017 -007 Approving Amendments To MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, And Abatement Contract For Land O ’ Lakes Project Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve City Properties Appraisal Services Proposal Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Bid From Valley -Rich Co. For Storm Sewer Manhole Repair At 1156 Amble Drive Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of An Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Accept Proposal For Engineering Services From WSB & Associates For The 2017 Trail And Watermain Projects Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of A 2018 Mack Chassis And Towmaster Dump Truck Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Final Payment #12 To Meyer Contracting, Inc., For The Round Lake Road Improvements Project Sue Polka, Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Under this Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. Please be sure to complete a "Request to Appear before City Council" form (available at the back table). Completed forms may be given to the City Clerk. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity For Residents Mayor Grant MEMO.PDF Resolution 2017 -008 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments For Delinquent Utilities Dave Perrault, Finance Analyst Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Resolution 2017 -006 Vacating Drainage Easement –Boston Scientific -4100 Hamline Avenue North (PC 2017 -005) Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal From WSB & Associates To Complete The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Dave McClungBrenda Holden Fran HolmesSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaMarch 13, 20177:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents: 5.E. Documents: 5.F. Documents: 5.G. Documents: 5.H. Documents: 5.I. Documents: 5.J. Documents: 5.K. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSRice Creek Commons (TCAAP) And Joint Development Authority (JDA) UpdateWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 30, 2017 Special City Council Work Session01-30 -17 -SWS.PDFFebruary 13, 2017 Regular City Council02-13 -17 -R.PDFFebruary 21, 2017 City Council Work Session02-21 -17 -WS.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative ServicesAshley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Public Works SuperintendentWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Customer Service SpecialistWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve PC 2017 -002 - Boston Scientific Site Plan ReviewMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2017 -007 Approving Amendments To MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, And Abatement Contract For Land O ’ Lakes ProjectMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve City Properties Appraisal Services ProposalMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Accept Bid From Valley -Rich Co. For Storm Sewer Manhole Repair At 1156 Amble DriveSue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Authorize The Purchase Of An Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Accept Proposal For Engineering Services From WSB & Associates For The 2017 Trail And Watermain ProjectsSue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Authorize The Purchase Of A 2018 Mack Chassis And Towmaster Dump Truck Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Final Payment #12 To Meyer Contracting, Inc., For The Round Lake Road Improvements Project Sue Polka, Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Under this Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. Please be sure to complete a "Request to Appear before City Council" form (available at the back table). Completed forms may be given to the City Clerk. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity For Residents Mayor Grant MEMO.PDF Resolution 2017 -008 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments For Delinquent Utilities Dave Perrault, Finance Analyst Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Resolution 2017 -006 Vacating Drainage Easement –Boston Scientific -4100 Hamline Avenue North (PC 2017 -005) Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal From WSB & Associates To Complete The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Dave McClungBrenda Holden Fran HolmesSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaMarch 13, 20177:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:5.E.Documents:5.F.Documents:5.G.Documents:5.H.Documents:5.I.Documents: 5.J. Documents: 5.K. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALPublic inquiries/informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.STAFF COMMENTSRice Creek Commons (TCAAP) And Joint Development Authority (JDA) UpdateWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 30, 2017 Special City Council Work Session01-30 -17 -SWS.PDFFebruary 13, 2017 Regular City Council02-13 -17 -R.PDFFebruary 21, 2017 City Council Work Session02-21 -17 -WS.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative ServicesAshley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Public Works SuperintendentWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Customer Service SpecialistWilliam S. Joynes, Sr., City AdministratorSue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve PC 2017 -002 - Boston Scientific Site Plan ReviewMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2017 -007 Approving Amendments To MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, And Abatement Contract For Land O ’ Lakes ProjectMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve City Properties Appraisal Services ProposalMatthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Accept Bid From Valley -Rich Co. For Storm Sewer Manhole Repair At 1156 Amble DriveSue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Authorize The Purchase Of An Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Accept Proposal For Engineering Services From WSB & Associates For The 2017 Trail And Watermain ProjectsSue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Authorize The Purchase Of A 2018 Mack Chassis And Towmaster Dump TruckSue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Approve Final Payment #12 To Meyer Contracting, Inc., For The Round Lake Road Improvements ProjectSue Polka, Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSUnder this Public Hearing section, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. Please be sure to complete a "Request to Appear before City Council" form (available at the back table). Completed forms may be given to the City Clerk. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity For ResidentsMayor Grant MEMO.PDFResolution 2017 -008 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments For Delinquent UtilitiesDave Perrault, Finance AnalystPang Silseth, Accounting Clerk MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDF Resolution 2017 -006 Vacating Drainage Easement –Boston Scientific -4100 Hamline Avenue North (PC 2017 -005) Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal From WSB & Associates To Complete The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Dave McClungBrenda Holden Fran HolmesSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaMarch 13, 20177:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:5.E.Documents:5.F.Documents:5.G.Documents:5.H.Documents:5.I.Documents:5.J.Documents:5.K.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 10. Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) and Joint Development Authority (JDA) Update A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. STAFF COMMENTS –3A MEMORANDUM Approved: March 13, 2017 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING JANUARY 30, 2017 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Bill Joynes; Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sue Iverson; Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Sue Polka; Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Andy Brotzler; Senior Planner Matthew Bachler; Interim City Planner Eric Zweber; and City Clerk Julie Hanson 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. TCAAP Civic Site City Administrator Joynes stated at the City Council meeting on December 12, 2016, the Council approved an Option Agreement with the TCAAP Master Developer that would allow the City to purchase the 1.6-acre Civic zoned property on the TCAAP site. The Option Agreement provides the City up to seven years to acquire the site with the timeframe beginning once the JDA approves the Master Development Agreement (MDA) with the Master Developer. The City’s plans for the property must conform to the TCAAP Redevelopment Code and be approved by the Master Developer. City Administrator Joynes explained the sales terms will depend on when the City is ready to move forward with construction. The City has an incentive to move quickly on developing a plan for the property as an earlier sale will result in better terms for the City. If the sale occurs within two years of the MDA approval, the City will be required to pay $1 for the land and have no costs associated with the infrastructure improvements to be completed by the Master Developer (underground parking, utilities, and road improvements). Following this two-year period, the City would incur greater costs for the land purchase and infrastructure improvements. The Option Agreement expires seven years after the MDA is approved, at which point the property will be rezoned Town Center-3. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 30, 2017 2 Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the minimum and maximum setbacks for the civic site and commented further on the build to zone for this property. City Administrator Joynes provided the Council with further information to help frame the City’s discussion regarding the future use of the civic site. Preliminary discussion by the City Council has focused on the possible use of the property for a community center, library, licensing center, a new location for City Hall, or a combination of these uses. Staff described the site development and use requirements specified in the TCAAP Redevelopment Code, reviewed the types of community centers in surrounding communities, and provided preliminary cost estimates and financing options. He estimated the financing gap to be roughly $5 million at this time. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Brotzler discussed his history with similar projects and explained he could review this process with the Council at a future meeting. Janel Taveggia, WSB, introduced herself to the Council and stated she works in land development alongside architects. She discussed a similar civic project she completed in Blaine. Steve Sorensen introduced himself to the City Council and described his work experience with municipalities on civic properties. He believed the first decision the Council would have to make was to determine what was the best use for this property. He reiterated the fact that the City had two years to develop this site. Councilmember Scott asked how common it was for a City to receive a piece of property within a new development to be used for a civic use. Mr. Sorensen explained this was very rare. City Administrator Joynes stated the Council should focus on the vision for the property first and that a decision regarding the process would come later. Mayor Grant stated that the Developer was offering the civic site to the City in order to assist in drawing people to the site, while also creating interest and vitality within the development. He understood the land that has been set aside for the civic site was a very nice piece of land. He questioned if the Council wanted to proceed with discussing the process or the vision for the civic site. Councilmember Holmes believed the Council should address the vision first. Mayor Grant questioned what the Council’s vision was for this property. Councilmember Scott understood the City was underserved for library services. He wanted to see some sort of civic use on the site in conjunction with a Ramsey County library. Councilmember Holden did not believe the City would receive a library given the fact Shoreview and New Brighton had branches. She stated a library space with a computer resource center may be a better option for this space, along with public meeting space. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 30, 2017 3 Mayor Grant agreed and stated he would support moving City Hall to the TCAAP civic site. He then reviewed the proposed process being offered by WSB for this project. Mr. Sorensen requested the Council define who would be involved in this process. Discussion ensued regarding the pros and cons of having the community involved in this process given the fact the City had only two years to complete the project. Councilmember McClung asked that if City Hall was not relocated to TCAAP would a fit analysis be completed on the existing City Hall building. He expressed concern with the expense to retrofit and update the current facility. He believed this information would assist him in making a decision on whether or not City Hall should move to TCAAP. He explained he was adamantly against moving City Hall at first, but after considering the expense to renovate he could be convinced this was a better option for the City. He wanted to see community space available to residents. Mr. Sorensen believed some sort of analysis should be completed in order to project the amount of square footage City Hall would have to add in order to meet the needs of its residents over the coming years. Councilmember Holden questioned how often the community space at City Hall was used. Councilmember McClung believed a large number of community events or meetings would move to Arden Hills if the space was available. Mayor Grant stated if the Council decided to move City Hall this could occupy roughly 20,000 square feet of space and the other 20,000 square feet could be used in another way. He recommended that the decision to move City Hall remain with the City Council. Councilmember Holmes agreed. Councilmember Holden questioned if a three-story building could be constructed on the civic site. Mr. Sorensen stated the City may run into parking concerns if a three-story building were constructed. Mayor Grant suggested each of the City’s committees and commissions have two volunteers assist in representing the community on a civic site task force. Another option would be to create a task force with new City volunteers. Councilmember Holden supported Mayor Grant’s first suggestion and wanted to see committee and commission members be asked to assist on a task force. Councilmember Scott still did not support moving City Hall unless it cost more to stay in the current building than to build a new site. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 30, 2017 4 Councilmember Holmes recommended two volunteers be sought from the EDC, Parks and Recreation and Planning Commission. She also suggested that a representative from Northeast Youth and Family Services be included. Councilmember McClung requested two volunteers also be included from FPAC. Councilmember Holden recommended at least one volunteer be included from the Communications Committee as well. Ms. Taveggia suggested the Council also consider the growing needs for the Public Works Department when completing a fit analysis. Interim City Planner Zweber recommended the City seek a professional valuation of the current City Hall building. Mayor Grant asked if the Council was interested in contacting the school district to see if they were interested in holding community education classes on the civic site, along with other partners. City Administrator Joynes recommended the Council consider hiring a consultant to assist with the planning process for the civic site. He explained this would offer an unbiased opinion on the project. Councilmember Holmes wanted to see the task force reacting to the Council versus the other way around. The Council discussed the amount of SAC credits that would be available to assist with funding this project, along with other amenities on TCAAP. Mayor Grant asked what other questions staff had for the Council. City Administrator Joynes summarized the comments he had received from the Council noting he would report back with a task force structure, along with a proposal for an RFP for a consultant to manage the civic site process. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Mayor Grant stated Arden Hills was deemed the fifth safest city in Minnesota (based on population size) according to the SafeWise Report . He asked staff to present this certificate at an upcoming meeting and to make note of this accomplishment in the City’s next newsletter. Mayor Grant reported the JDA would be meeting on Monday, February 6. Councilmember Holden requested the snow plow drivers be made aware of the “no wake” zone on County Road E. Councilmember Holmes asked that the Council discuss A-line through TCAAP and I&I grants with the Met Council representative in February. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 30, 2017 5 Mayor Grant requested an update from staff on the trails. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka provided the Council with an update on the ongoing trail projects. Mayor Grant recommended the City apply for bridge funding for Snelling Avenue near Lindey’s. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 6:52 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: March 13, 2017 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 2017 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Bill Joynes; Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sue Iverson; Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Sue Polka; Interim City Planner Eric Zweber; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Grant requested Item 8C be moved to the Consent Agenda for approval as Item 5N. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3. STAFF COMMENTS A. Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) and Joint Development Authority (JDA) Update City Administrator Joynes provided an update on TCAAP stating a number of small group meetings have been held in the last two weeks. He explained the City was waiting for a proposal from the developer on how the infrastructure improvements would be handled and how these ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 2 improvements would be phased. He reported the City would be meeting with representatives from the County and Master Developer in two weeks where an agreement would be formed and this information would be passed along to the JDA. He anticipated the JDA meeting for February 22 would be canceled. Councilmember Holmes questioned when the Master Development Agreement would be approved. City Administrator Joynes estimated the Master Development Agreement would be approved in late May or early June. Councilmember Holden asked if the developer had considered a name change for the development. City Administrator Joynes stated he was not aware of a new name but would discuss this with the master developer. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 12, 2016, Special City Council Work Session B. December 12, 2016, Regular City Council C. December 13, 2016, Special City Council Work Session D. December 19, 2016, City Council Work Session E. December 19, 2016, Special Regular City Council F. January 9, 2017, Regular City Council G. January 17, 2017, City Council Work Session Councilmember Holden requested a change to the January 17 City Council work session minutes on Page 3, noting the streets slated for work in 2017-2019 were Park Shore Drive, Brueberry Lane, Wedgewood Circle and Floral Drive. Councilmember Holden requested a change to the December 19 Special City Council minutes on Page 4, stating in the fourth paragraph should be amended adding: Councilmember Holden believed Jonathan Wicklund should be taken out of consideration given the fact that he wanted to be on the Council but was not willing to campaign for re-election, was unwilling to talk to residents while currently on the Council and was unwilling to help with other City Committees. She stated she would support Steven Jones or Kyle Lassen before Councilmember Wicklund given their level of commitment to the City. In addition, after Mayor Grant’s comment, her statement should reflect she believed David Sand was the best candidate for Chair of the JDA. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to approve the December 12, 2016, Special City Council Work Session meeting minutes, December 12, 2016, Regular City Council meeting minutes, December 13, 2016, Special City Council Work Session meeting minutes; December 19, 2016, City Council Work Session meeting minutes; December 19, 2016, Special Regular City Council meeting minutes; January 9, 2017, Regular City Council meeting minutes; and January 17, 2017, City Council ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 3 Work Session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Pay Equity Report C. Motion to Approve the Amended 2017 Fee Schedule D. Motion to Approve Resolution 2017-005 Approving LG230 Application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling for Merrick, Inc. E. Motion to Approve Resolution 2017-003 Appointing Paul Beggin to the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) for a term expiring December 31, 2019 F. Motion to Approve Resolution 2017-004 Appointing Rob Williams to the Economic Development Commission (EDC) for a term expiring December 31, 2019 G. Motion to Approve the Proposed Schedule and Scope for Planning and Economic Development Services for a Higher Education Study H. Motion to Approve the Proposal to Authorize WSB to Complete the City’s Water Supply Plan Upgrade I. Motion to Accept the Proposal from Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. for Removal and Replacement of Bridge Lighting at County Road E and Snelling Avenue J. Motion to Approve Lake Johanna Fire Department Capital Expenditures K. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2017-002 Amending Chapter 6, Subsection 620.05 of the Arden Hills City Code regarding Alarm Systems and User Fees; Notices L. Motion to Accept Resignation of Ken Novack, Public Works Superintendent M. Motion to Cancel February 27, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting N. Motion to Approve Rice Creek Commons Municipal Site Task Force MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended, adding Item 5N and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 6. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TCAAP Development Discussion Opportunity for Residents Mayor Grant stated under the Public Hearing section, citizens would have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding the TCAAP development. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 4 8. NEW BUSINESS A. 2017 Trail Project and Old Snelling Water Main Improvement Project 17-W- 001 – Engineering Services Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated an 8-ft wide bituminous trail is proposed along the south side of County Road E2 to connect the existing bituminous trail that was recently constructed on the east side of Cleveland Avenue SW and the existing bituminous trial at New Brighton Road. Currently there is not a crosswalk at the New Brighton Road trail crossing. A pedestrian crossing and ramps are proposed to accommodate the trail entrance at this point. This bituminous trail will be approximately 655-ft long. Initially staff considered extending the trail along the existing shoulder. After meeting with Ramsey County staff, they have indicated that they would consider 1) allowing the City to place bike trail symbol markings on the existing shoulder or 2) locating the trail in the boulevard behind the existing curb. If the council chooses to consider option 2, WSB would complete a topographic survey, prepare a preliminary alignment and cost estimate for further consideration. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka explained the Old Snelling Trail Improvements project proposes the addition of bituminous trails along County Road E (CR E) and Old Snelling Avenue. Previous engineering studies determined preliminary design for the trail on the south side of CR E between Freeway Park and Old Snelling Avenue and for the trail on the west side of Old Snelling Ave between CR E and Bethel Drive. A preliminary design for the trail segment was completed by Elfering Engineering with a preliminary total cost estimate of $882,000. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka indicated also proposed is the addition of a bituminous trail along the west side of Old Snelling Avenue between Bethel Drive and County Road E2 (CR E2). A feasibility study was completed in 2008 by Bolton & Menk for the Old Snelling Avenue Trail from SH 51 to CSAH 96. In the study, it was recommended to locate the trail along the west side of Old Snelling Avenue. The segment between Bethel Drive and CR E2 is identified as a 10’ wide urban trail (directly behind the curb) with a retaining wall to minimize impacts which include driveways, steep slopes, landscaping and wetlands. Due to the need for wetland delineations, potential wetland impacts and mitigation requirements, and permitting, WSB has provided an alternate schedule in the event the project is delayed due to the permitting timeline. The preliminary estimate for the trail, including project costs is $700,000. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported the 2017 CIP includes a project for CR E2 Water Main Replacement/Old Hwy 10 Water Loop. The purpose of this project is to replace existing 12” water main on CR E2 from Old Snelling Ave to Valentine Hills School as the main has experienced numerous breaks due to deterioration of the pipe material. Due to the location of the existing water main on CR E2, the existing trail will also need to be replaced. In addition, completion of a water main loop on Old Snelling Avenue from CR E2 to CR E will provide redundancy in the system and no longer require temporary feeds in the system or loss of service in the event of breaks in other areas. The completion of the water main loop is also required to supply water to the TCAAP site. The CIP identifies $400,000 for this project to be paid from the water fund. The current estimate is approximately $500,000 if directional drilling ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 5 is a viable construction method and $600,000 if open cut construction with bituminous patching is necessary. Soil borings and a geotechnical investigation are included in the scope of work. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated the trail along County Road F west of Lexington Avenue is also identified in the CIP. Staff recently met with Ramsey County to discuss trail projects. Ramsey County is currently planning a 2018 project for improvements on County Road F to include widening, addition of turn lanes and a traffic signal at Innovation Way. The County had planned to include the trail connection with the roadway project. Ramsey County staff plans to present the project to the City Council at a future meeting. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the scope and fee for the 2017 Trail Projects and the Old Snelling Water Main Improvements Project that is presented by WSB & Associates. If accepted, WSB & Associates will begin the design for trail segments and the water main. Staff recommended this project be completed in conjunction with the County’s project. Councilmember Holden asked how much the feasibility study would cost for the trail segment from Cleveland Avenue to New Brighton Road. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated she did not have this expense broken down per trail segment. She estimated the construction would be $200,000, but this would increase if the trail had to be located behind the power poles. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to discuss this trail segment further given the number of unknowns. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka indicated she could bring this trail segment back to the Council at an upcoming worksession meeting. Mayor Grant commented on the Bethel Trail project and asked if the County has authorized the City to use of the shoulder near the pond. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported this was the case. Councilmember Holden questioned if borings had been taken on County Road F. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated the County would be coming before the Council with additional information on this project in the near future. Councilmember Holmes asked if the proposed fee includes engineering for County Road F. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated this project was removed from the proposal. Further discussion ensued regarding the trail segments and which portions should be completed in 2017 and those that should not. Councilmember Scott recalled the Bethel trail was the focus for 2017. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 6 Mayor Grant recommended staff provide the Council with greater detail in the future noting the specific engineering price for each trail segment. He then asked how much the Bethel trail would cost to construct. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported the current estimate was $700,000, noting the retaining wall expense was quite high. She explained the plans would be worked on and would be reviewed by the Council again at a future meeting. Mayor Grant commented on the funding gap for this trail of approximately $500,000. Councilmember McClung suggested the Council table action on this item and direct staff to break up the project numbers in more detail for the Council to review in March. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka did not anticipate this would be a problem. Mayor Grant questioned if the watermain loop could be completed separately from the trail segment. Interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported this could be done. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to table action on this item to the March 13, 2017 City Council meeting. The motion carried (5-0). B. City Properties Appraisal Services Proposal City Administrator Joynes stated at the City Council Work Session on January 30, 2017, the City Council discussed the Option Agreement to purchase the Civic property on TCAAP and potential funding sources for development on the site. One of the funding sources discussed was the sale of the old City Hall property at 1450 West Highway 96 and the current City Hall property at 1245 West Highway 96. The City Council directed staff to have an appraisal completed so the City can better evaluate the potential sale of the two properties. Staff contacted three appraisal firms and requested a quote for the following scope of work: • Property 1 – 1450 West Highway 96 - Value given development with uses allowed by current Neighborhood Business Zoning - Value given development with townhomes - Value given development with single-family homes • Property 2 – 1245 West Highway 96 - Value given development with limited commercial uses, such as office, medical, or limited retail uses City Administrator Joynes explained two firms provided quotes for the appraisal services: BRKW and Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm. Of the quotes received, BRKW was the lower amount at $10,500.00. BRKW also proposed completing the work within two months of ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 7 authorization to proceed, while Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm estimated a 10- to 12-week timeframe for completion. Councilmember Holden suggested the word “limited” be removed from the suggested uses for Property 2. Mayor Grant supported this recommendation. Councilmember Holden recommended Neighborhood Business be eliminated as a potential use for Property 1. She recommended this property be zoned Commercial. Councilmember Holmes supported Property 1 being a Neighborhood Business given its close proximity to the townhouses. Mayor Grant stated he was interested in receiving the appraisals prior to making any decision on the zoning for the properties. Councilmember McClung agreed and stated he was in favor of looking at all potential options for Property 1. Councilmember Holmes questioned why the City was not pursuing townhouses and single- family on the existing City Hall property. Interim City Planner Zweber explained the reason this was not pursued was because this would create a stand-alone neighborhood that would be surrounded by the Army Reserve. Councilmember Holmes stated she would like to review this potential within the appraisals. Councilmember McClung agreed with this recommendation. Councilmember Holden suggested multi-family also be considered for this property. She believed it made more sense to put an apartment complex on this property than single-family homes. Mayor Grant agreed. Councilmember Holden requested further information on how staff defined the cost approach. Interim City Planner Zweber explained this meant looking at the land and then the building value separately. City Administrator Joynes recommended staff be allowed to redraft the wording on the appraisals and see if the bid amount would remain the same, given the fact the scope of the work has changed. He suggested this item be tabled to the first Council meeting in March. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 8 MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to table action on this item to the March 13, 2017 City Council meeting. The motion carried (5-0). C. Rice Creek Commons Municipal Site Task Force This item was approved on the Consent Agenda. D. Professional Services Agreement with WSB & Associates City Administrator Joynes stated the City has worked with WSB and Associates under a Professional Services Agreement during the last half of 2016. They have provided public works supervision, engineering services, and planning support on a limited and as needed basis for a three-month period. Staff has asked WSB to provide an extended agreement going forward that would provide ongoing support in the same content areas for a period of three years with timely reviews on an annual basis. The agreement provides for 32 hours per work of on-site public works directorship with Sue Polka filling that role. He recommended this be under a retainer arrangement of $10,500 per month with all other additional services charged under the fee schedule. It is anticipated that the majority of those fees will be charged to various projects as approved. City Administrator Joynes explained the principals of the WSB Arden Hills team will remain the same with Andy Brotzler and Bret Weiss providing ongoing, specialty services. The City will realize a savings in General Fund personnel costs and staff believed the degrees of expertise that would be supporting the City would be greatly enhanced over our past experience. Councilmember Holden asked if the Personnel Committee had reviewed this matter. City Administrator Joynes stated this matter was being determined by the entire City Council. Councilmember Holden discussed the cost savings the City would receive by contracting engineering services with WSB and noted the City would be saving roughly $100,000. Councilmember Holmes questioned the length of the proposed contract. City Administrator Joynes reported the contract was for three years. He noted there was a 90- day termination clause and the Council would be reviewing the contract on an annual basis. He described how engineering services would be billed hourly to the City if over and above the 32 hours within the contract. Councilmember Holmes asked if Ms. Polka would be representing the City for TCAAP. City Administrator Joynes explained Andy Brotzler would represent the City in this capacity, along with Brad Weiss, while Ms. Polka would act as the Public Works Director/City Engineer on a day to day basis. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 9 MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to direct the City Administrator to execute the Professional Services Agreement with WSB and Associates. The motion carried (5-0). E. Request for Proposals – City Hall Assessment and TCAAP Civic Site City Administrator Joynes stated the City has been offered an option to purchase the 1.6-acre Civic zoned property on the TCAAP site. A Civic Site Task Force is being created to look at the possibility of building and operating a public facility on the property. The RFP outlines two phases for the project as well as one alternate. • Phase 1 – Lifecycle and Maintenance Assessment of Existing City Hall • Phase 2 – Conceptual Design, Site Assessment, Cost Estimation and Community Engagement Facilitation for the TCAAP Civic Site • Alternate 1 – Assessment of Space Needs of the Public Works Facility City Administrator Joynes explained staff has identified a list of architects with experience in municipal projects. In addition to sending the RFP to these architects, the RFP could be advertised on the League of Minnesota Cities and American Institute of Architects – Minnesota websites. Staff requested the Council direct staff to issue RFP’s. Mayor Grant understood Phase 1, Phase 2 and Alternate 1 would be priced individually. City Administrator Joynes stated this was the case. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with how much of TCAAP the City would be responsible for. City Administrator Joynes indicated the City would have one-third more roads and utilities to maintain along with 4,000 new residents once TCAAP was completely developed. The Council would have to determine if the current City Hall would accommodate these needs. He discussed the unique opportunity the City had to develop a Civic Site on TCAAP. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to Authorize the City Administrator to issue the Request for Proposals for Lifecycle and Maintenance Assessment of Existing City Hall and Conceptual Design, Site Assessment, Cost Estimation and Community Engagement Facilitation for the TCAAP Site. The motion carried (5-0). 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Grant stated he visited the Tavern Grill and was pleased this restaurant was now open in Arden Hills. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 13, 2017 10 Mayor Grant discussed the work being conducted at Land O’Lakes. Mayor Grant noted he attended the Five Mayors meeting with the school district where the group discussed the expansion of the Shoreview Community Center in 2017 and also that the school district enrollment was on the rise. Councilmember McClung indicated the Ramsey County Friends of the Park were holding their annual tree sale. He encouraged Arden Hills’ residents to participate in this event and donate a tree to help beautify the City parks. He requested staff put a link to the tree sale on the City’s website. Councilmember McClung indicated the deadline for registering for the Ramsey County League of Local Government Annual Legislative Briefing was Friday, February 17 and the meeting will be held on Thursday, February 23 at the North St. Paul City Hall. Councilmember Holden asked if food trucks were allowed in Arden Hills. City Administrator Joynes explained he and Senior Planner Bachler had discussed the request of the North Metro Exam Station and determined the request would fall under more of a private, catering situation since the food truck would be on private property only and not accessible to the public. Councilmember Holden suggested the Council discuss having budget information be included on all staff reports at an upcoming work session. Councilmember Scott stated he attended the Newly Elected Officials training last month. He provided further comment on the valuable information he gained from this conference. Councilmember Scott indicated he also visited the Tavern Grill and stated the food was quite good. He was pleased to see this new business doing well in the community. Mayor Grant explained he received a letter on behalf of the City of St. Anthony on WSB letterhead thanking the City for their assistance of the wellhead protection plan. Mayor Grant reported the United States Department of Commerce has sent the City notice that they would be completing a census in 2020. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:28 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: March 13, 2017 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 21, 2017 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sue Iverson, Public Works Director/City Engineer Sue Polka, Senior Planner Matthew Bachler, Interim City Planner Eric Zweber, Deputy Clerk Jolene Trauba, Metropolitan Council Member Marie McCarthy, BRT/Small Starts Senior Manager Charles Carlson, Metropolitan Council Senior Planner Eric Wojchik, and Metropolitan Council Community Relations Specialist Zoe Mullendore 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. DISCUSSION WITH METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MEMBER McCARTHY Metropolitan Council Member Marie McCarthy thanked the Council for the opportunity to be at the meeting to answer their questions, then introduced BRT/Small Starts Senior Manager Charles Carlson to address the first topic: Status of the A-Line BRT route extension. Senior Manager Carlson presented a PowerPoint outlining the status of the A-Line, noting the ridership, cost to implement an extension, and recommendations. Recommendations included local transit being extended, the BRT be extended in phases, transit readiness be planned into local roadway projects and plans toward pedestrian friendly development patterns be implemented. He also noted that a budget shortfall could cause delay in the extension of the A- line. Councilmember Holmes asked if to save money they could possibly not add bus stations but have bus service running. Senior Manager Carlson stated that local transit service would not include new bus stops and ridership would be built up during that time. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 21, 2017 2 Mayor Grant wondered if they would be reducing bus service to make up for the budget shortfall. Senior Manager Carlson responded that there is the potential for significant reduction in service. The budget is based on the forecast of motor vehicle sales and the sales tax they receive. Metro-mobility service is also required and very expensive. A fare increase may be contemplated. Councilmember Holden asked if when looking at ridership is it based just on number of employees at large corporations or do they look at younger people that are more willing to take the bus? Senior Manager Carlson said they are looking at how they connect employees here into the region. Part of that would be to avoid the transfer connection at Rosedale, increasing the level of service and matching it to where people are actually coming from. Councilmember Scott remarked that he feels the community here will be receptive to more transit service. Mayor Grant asked if they have had similar discussions with Ramsey County in regards to getting bus service the to TCAAP area. Senior Manager Carlson replied that the county is a significant transit funder, although they haven’t had a discussion specifically toward the A-line extension. Metropolitan Council Member McCarthy asked if we were to extend the route, what would the rough estimate be for operating costs. Senior Manager Carlson stated that the rule of thumb is one half million dollars per bus per year. Extending Route 84 to Arden Hills by one bus would get to the County Road F area. Two buses would get to the TCAAP site on a half hour basis. Metropolitan Council Member McCarthy mentioned a handout that was passed around answering other questions the Council had asked at the last meeting she attended. Metropolitan Council Senior Planner Eric Wojchik gave a brief overview of I&I (inflow and infiltration) in the region. Arden Hills has experienced a decline in overall flows in recent years. Arden Hills exceeded the maximum allowable flow rate in 2012, 2014 and 2016 during rainfall events, and successfully completed the requirements for each exceedance. Metropolitan Council Senior Planner Wojchik then addressed the availability of I&I grants, Livable Communities Act grants, storm water grants, and approximate timelines for grant applications. Arden Hills was reimbursed $60,000 through grants last year. The governor has allocated $5 million in his proposed budget for 2017 for I&I mitigation grants. Councilmember Holden expressed concern that more grant money would be given to communities that were behind on I&I than those communities that are working on the issue. Metropolitan Council Member McCarthy stated there is a task force looking into it now and money will be allocated according to what the legislature directs them to do. Metropolitan Council Senior Planner Wojchik noted that Arden Hills is in the Livable Communities Act program. Communities must adopt goals for life cycle housing to be involved. Arden Hills has negotiated for the current cycle. The Innovative Storm Water grant was launched last year. The City would need to partner with the Rice Creek Watershed District for that grant. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 21, 2017 3 Metropolitan Council Senior Planner Wojchik discussed the comprehensive planning process and timeframes. There is a new handbook available to assist the cities. He said the ten year planning cycle for the comprehensive plan begins with the census and plans are due by December 31, 2018. Mayor Grant requested the formula for grant funding. Metropolitan Council Member McCarthy stated they will provide that information at a later date. She commented that the Metropolitan Council will continue to assist the City and Council with any questions they may have on grant funding or the comprehensive plan. B. 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Senior Planner Matthew Bachler noted that the City Council discussed their goals for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at works sessions in May and July 2016. They will be treating the 2040 plan as an update to the 2030 plan. WSB submitted a proposal for the work on the plan. There is a required 6 month review process so the plan should be completed by end of May 2018. The WSB proposal would have the plan completed by March 2018. WSB’s total project budget is $131,050. The requested action is for the Council to review the WSB proposal and authorize staff to negotiate a contract with WSB to be brought to Council at the March 13, 2017 meeting and not issue an RFP. Costs for other cities were discussed. Councilmember McClung felt an RFP should be issued and see what other bids may come in. Mayor Grant agreed. He feels there is some value in keeping the plan with WSB being as we have a working relationship with them now. Interim City Planner Eric Zweber mentioned that there are some items in the WSB proposal that are not required by the Metropolitan Council. Economic Development and Redevelopment, Local Parks and Trails and the extra Land Use and Housing items in Section II are not required. Senior Planner Bachler stated that these were additional items that he chose to include as areas of potential concern that the City Council may wish to address, but the items could be removed to potentially reduce the cost of the proposal. Councilmember Holmes suggested we have WSB remove the items not required, and submit a new proposal instead of issuing an RFP. Public Works Director/City Engineer Sue Polka noted that the surface water management plan is due to Rice Creek Watershed District by January 2018 and the DNR water supply plan is due in October, both of which are a part of the Comprehensive Plan. Interim City Planner Zweber said WSB can come back with a minimum dollar amount and an ala carte’ list and the council can choose those things they wish to do. Mayor Grant instructed staff to slim down the proposal to the required items, remove items that are being funded elsewhere, and have the new proposal available at the March 13 Council meeting. C. 2017 TRAIL PROJECTS – ENGINEERING SERVICES ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 21, 2017 4 Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated she would not go into a lot of detail due to previous discussions. The estimated total costs for the three proposed trails is about $1.7 million. There is $1.9 million identified in the CIP. As a note, the Old Snelling Trail preliminary design reimbursement is $800,000 so there will be very little left to split between the City and County for that portion of the trail project. The Old Snelling/E2 Watermain Loop cost will depend on if they can do directional drilling or not. The WSB total design/construction services would be about $50,000 less than originally thought. A topographic survey is needed to complete the feasibility study/preliminary design. Mayor Grant asked if the work would be done in 2017 on the Old Snelling trail, with Council approval. Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated that if they want to move forward with the Watermain Loop they would have to get going on that shortly, but may not be able to pave the trail this year. If they were to do the trail only it could be completed this year. She recommended they do both the Old Snelling trail and the Watermain Loop at the same time. Mayor Grant suggested they move forward with the feasibility study on the trails that need it and start work on the remainder. Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka suggested that they get all the plans and approvals complete and go out for bids next January. She asked if they would like staff to get started on the final design for the Old Snelling Trail from County Rd E to Bethel? Councilmember McClung noted that the proposed preliminary design for Cty Rd E2 trail, Old Snelling trail from Bethel to E2 and the Watermain loop will be presented at the March 13 Council meeting and the final design for the Old Snelling trail from Cty Rd E to Bethel. D. TCAAP COUNTY RESOLUTION Mayor Grant said there was a 4 page legal document outlining the State statue, joint powers and County charter and how they do/don’t work together. Councilmember Holden wanted more clarification on the 3% or 10% deviation on parks, and if it was per park or per zone. Senior Planner Bachler said it is a 3% reduction in area per park. Councilmember Holden asked when they make changes according to the 4 page document, does a comprehensive plan change have to come to the Council? Senior Planner Bachler stated that any amendment to the TCCAP Redevelopment Code would require City Council approval. He noted that depending on the nature of the amendment, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment may also be required. Mayor Grant said he feels this document is merely enabling Commissioners Hoffman and Ortega to be able to approve something which normally a commissioner would not be able to approve. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 21, 2017 5 Councilmember Holden said she would also like to discuss how grants are split. Councilmember McClung felt we should check with our attorney to see how we would cover Chair Wicklund if an issue arises. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES NONE ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 7:21 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Jolene Trauba David Grant Deputy Clerk Mayor Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Ashley Bertrand, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims & Payroll Requested Action: 1. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item – Claims and Payroll Supporting Documents: Payroll 2017 Payroll #3-1 ................................................................................... $ 11,001.90 2017 Payroll #4 ...................................................................................... $ 59,880.63 2017 Payroll #4-1 ................................................................................... $ 2,039.38 2017 Payroll #5 ...................................................................................... $ 74,266.27 Total Payroll $ 147,188.18 Accounts Payable Claims Through 3/10/2017 Paid Claims (Bank Fees) ........................................................................ $ 1,640.05 Paid Claims (Sales Tax) ......................................................................... $ 9,389.00 Paid Claims (Check No 46414-Check No 46410) ................................. $ 120,836.16 Paid Claims (Check No 46461) ............................................................. $ 624,611.73 Paid Claims (Check No 46472-Check No 46473) ................................. $ 429,726.88 Total Accounts Payable $ 1,175,174.77 Total Claims $ 1,322,362.95 CONSENT ITEM 5A MEMORANDUM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 3-1 CHECKS DATED: 02/15/17 Biweekly: - EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT EFT SIT EFT FICA Oasdi 1.58 EFT FICA Medicare 0.37 EFT TOTAL TAXES 1.95 Health Premium A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb.A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb.A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 0.00 HSA Health Saving Health Care Savings Plan 10,971.46 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2%EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 1.06 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 10,972.52 PERA 1.72 EFT ICMA EFT Central Pension Fund-Union A/P Check* MN State Retirement System EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 1.72 IUOE 49 Dues (Union)A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life A/P Check* UNUM A/P Check* AFLAC EFT Avesis-Vision Care A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 0.00 Total Employee Deductions 10,976.19 Net Payroll Direct Deposit 21.77 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 10,997.96 STD/LTD Gross - Up Plus City Paid Benefit 3.94 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 11,001.90 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 10,997.96 Less Total FSA 0.00 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 10,997.96 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 1.58 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 0.37 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 0.00 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 1.95 CITY BENEFIT 1.58 0.37 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 4 CHECKS DATED: 02/24/17 Biweekly: 02/04/17 - 02/17/17 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 4,608.61 EFT SIT 1,908.38 EFT FICA Oasdi 2,993.88 EFT FICA Medicare 700.16 EFT TOTAL TAXES 10,211.03 Health Premium 2,196.46 A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 145.83 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 208.33 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,550.62 HSA Health Saving 677.11 Health Care Savings Plan EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 235.39 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 452.85 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,365.35 PERA 3,285.07 EFT ICMA 377.44 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 126.80 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 4,403.71 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 136.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 40.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 83.00 A/P Check* UNUM 42.55 A/P Check* AFLAC 191.58 EFT Avesis-Vision Care 6.51 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 499.64 Total Employee Deductions 19,030.35 Net Payroll Direct Deposit 33,365.76 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 52,396.11 STD/LTD Gross - Up Plus City Paid Benefit 7,484.52 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 59,880.63 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 52,396.11 Less Total FSA 2,550.62 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 49,845.49 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 2,993.88 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 700.16 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 3,694.04 CITY BENEFIT 2,993.88 700.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,790.48 0.00 3,790.48 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 4-1 CHECKS DATED: 02/27/17 Biweekly: - EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT EFT SIT EFT FICA Oasdi EFT FICA Medicare EFT TOTAL TAXES 0.00 Health Premium A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb.A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb.A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 0.00 HSA Health Saving Health Care Savings Plan 2,039.38 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2%EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4%EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 2,039.38 PERA EFT ICMA EFT Central Pension Fund-Union A/P Check* MN State Retirement System EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 0.00 IUOE 49 Dues (Union)A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life A/P Check* UNUM A/P Check* AFLAC EFT Avesis-Vision Care A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 0.00 Total Employee Deductions 2,039.38 Net Payroll Direct Deposit 0.00 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 2,039.38 STD/LTD Gross - Up Plus City Paid Benefit 0.00 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 2,039.38 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 2,039.38 Less Total FSA 0.00 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 2,039.38 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 0.00 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 0.00 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CITY BENEFIT 0.00 0.00 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 5 CHECKS DATED: 03/10/17 Biweekly: 02/18/17 - 03/03/17 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 4,859.51 EFT SIT 1,973.68 EFT FICA Oasdi 2,957.02 EFT FICA Medicare 691.57 EFT TOTAL TAXES 10,481.78 Health Premium 2,239.15 A/P Check* Dental Premium A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 145.83 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 208.33 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,593.31 HSA Health Saving 677.17 Health Care Savings Plan EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 232.54 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 470.10 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,379.81 PERA 3,291.27 EFT ICMA 400.34 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 126.80 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 4,432.81 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 136.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 922.53 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 40.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 83.00 A/P Check* UNUM 42.55 A/P Check* AFLAC 191.58 EFT Avesis-Vision Care 5.70 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,421.36 Total Employee Deductions 20,309.07 Net Payroll Direct Deposit 31,549.88 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 51,858.95 STD/LTD Gross - Up Plus City Paid Benefit 22,407.32 ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 74,266.27 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 51,858.95 Less Total FSA 2,593.31 Plus Employer Match ICMA 0.00 Plus ICMA Benefit Held 0.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 49,265.64 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 2,957.02 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 691.57 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the "Taxtel" Electronic Tax Deposit Service. Trans- fers are typically made two business days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 3,648.59 CITY BENEFIT 2,957.02 691.57 0.00 13,017.72 1,089.68 14,107.40 779.71 779.71 3,797.62 74.00 3,797.62 74.00 Journal Entry Proof List General Ledger 60007.01.2016 User: Printed: dave.perrault 2/19/2016 - 1:17 PM Batch: Account Number Debit Amount System Reference Project ManagementLine DescriptionAccount Description Credit Amount Journal Entry: 163-01-2016 Journal Entry Date: 01/31/2016 101-41500-44371 CC Processing Fees 443.76 0.00 To allocate Jan 16 Credit Card and Bank Fees 101-41500-44371 CC Processing Fees 545.41 0.00 To allocate Jan 16 Credit Card and Bank Fees 101-41500-44371 CC Processing Fees 8.96 0.00 To allocate Jan 16 Credit Card and Bank Fees 101-41500-44376 Bank Service Charges 641.92 0.00 To allocate Jan 16 Credit Card and Bank Fees 101-00000-10100 Gen Cash & Investments 0.00 1,640.05 To allocate Jan 16 Credit Card and Bank Fees Journal Entry Totals Journal Entry Balance 1,640.05 1,640.05 0.00 Report Totals: 1,640.05 1,640.05 0.00 GL-Journal Entry Proof List (2/19/2016 - 1:17 PM)Page 1 1 Ashley Bertrand From:MN Revenue e-Services [eservices.mdor@state.mn.us] Sent:Wednesday, February 08, 2017 12:34 PM To:Ashley Bertrand Subject:Your Recent Return and Payment Requests This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Sales and Use Tax - Return Submitted Thank you, your request has been submitted. Please allow 3 business days for your return to appear online. Please allow 3 business days from 20-Feb-2017 for your payment to appear online. You can change or cancel this request until 5:00 p.m. Central time. Confirmation Summary Submitted Date and Time: 8-Feb-2017 12:33:23 PM Legal Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Federal Employer ID: 41-6008992 User Who Submitted: Accounting Analyst Type of Request Submitted: Return for 1/31/2017 Account Name: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF Minnesota ID: 9047998 Return Summary Return Confirmation Number: 1-668-484-416 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 31-Jan-2017 Projected Amount/Credit Due: $9,389.00 Payment Summary Payment Confirmation Number: 0-326-307-136 Account Type: Sales & Use Tax Filing Period: 31-Jan-2017 Payment Amount: $9,389.00 Payment Type: Return Payment Date: 20-Feb-2017 Bank Name: US BANK NA Bank Account Number: ********9377 Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Sales and Use Tax Division at 651-296-6181, (toll-free) 800-657-3777, or (email) SalesUse.Tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going to the History Tab. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. Accounts Payable User: Printed: ashley.bertrand 3/8/2017 2:04 PM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0602 US BANK 02/13/2017ACH DSchifsky-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 332.92 DSchifsky-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 55.63 DSchifsky-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 50.90 DSchifsky-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 16.99 DSchifsky-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 62.99 Grant-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 526.99 Hanson-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 30.00 Hanson-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 28.30 Iverson-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses 74.98 Mikacevich-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 74.72 Mikacevich-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 14.00 Mikacevich-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Mikacevich-1216 108.19 Mikacevich-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Mikacevich-1216 10.25 MSchifsky-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 269.92 Scherbel-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 9.63 Scherbel-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 260.00 Thelen-0117 Jan 17 CC Expenses Jan 17 CC Expenses 11.23 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 14.40 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 12.79 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 12.73 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 35.92 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 6.97 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 9.64 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 37.44 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 27.56 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 102.10 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -37.54 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -6.98 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 36.32 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses 21.25 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -10.68 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -7.48 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -10.67 Thelen-1216 Dec 16 CC Expenses Dec 16 CC Expenses -3.20 2,178.21Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0602: 2,178.21Total for 2/13/2017: 0453 Continental Research Corp.02/17/2017ACH 444870-CRC-1 PW Supplies PW Supplies 300.00 300.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0453: 1330 MN CLN SERVICES LLC 02/17/2017ACH 0217NN01 Jan 17 Cleaning Jan 17 Cleaning 1,478.75 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1,478.75Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1330: 6060 Batteries Plus 02/17/2017ACH 028-481187 PW Supplies PW Supplies 32.85 32.85Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6060: JOHC Johnson Controls 02/17/2017ACH 1-45768776666 City Hall Repair City Hall Repair 1,480.80 1,480.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: TOII Tokle Inspections, Inc 02/17/2017ACH 02012017-Tokle Jan 17 Inspections Jan 17 Inspections 5,518.40 5,518.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TOII: 4100 Boston Scientific 02/17/201746414 013117-PC16004 PC 16-004 Escrow Release PC 16-004 Escrow Release 248.14 248.14Total for Check Number 46414: 0495 Lake Johanna Fire Department Inc.02/17/201746415 593 2016 Capital Expenses: K-12 Saw 2016 Capital Expenses: K-12 Saw 700.71 700.71Total for Check Number 46415: 0811 Ramsey County 02/17/201746416 PHEH-042693 VSQG Disposal VSQG Disposal 40.00 PUBW-016043 Engineering Expenses Engineering Expenses 624.03 664.03Total for Check Number 46416: 6846 Anthony Richter 02/17/201746417 2015-00631 2015-00631 GE Escrow Release 2015-00631 GE Escrow Release 2,860.08 2,860.08Total for Check Number 46417: 4896 Xcel Energy 02/17/201746418 2016-01180 ROW 2016-01180 Permit Refund ROW 2016-01180 Permit Refund 150.00 150.00Total for Check Number 46418: 2597 AARP 02/17/201746419 02062017-AARP Feb 17 AARP Class Feb 17 AARP Class 60.00 60.00Total for Check Number 46419: 0131 Beisswenger's How-To Store 02/17/201746420 833604 PW Supplies PW Supplies 2.00 833980 PW Supplies PW Supplies 12.23 835201 PW Supplies PW Supplies 7.79 837869 PW Supplies PW Supplies 55.80 838712 PW Supplies PW Supplies 1.99 838812 PW Supplies PW Supplies 22.57 839047 PW Supplies PW Supplies 5.85 839150 PW Supplies PW Supplies 27.26 839831 PW Supplies PW Supplies 139.98 840625 PW Supplies PW Supplies 103.98 379.45Total for Check Number 46420: Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 9310 Hamline School of Business 02/17/201746421 02132017-HU Frid Training Frid Training 605.00 605.00Total for Check Number 46421: 0022 Thomas Mikacevich 02/17/201746422 02092017-TM Jan 17 Mileage Reimbursement Jan 17 Mileage Reimbursement 13.91 13.91Total for Check Number 46422: 7025 On Site Sanitation 02/17/201746423 371181 01/28-02/24 Rental 01/28-02/24 Rental 171.00 171.00Total for Check Number 46423: UB*00194 Dale & Debra Simon 02/17/201746424 Refund Check 140.00 140.00Total for Check Number 46424: 0327 Staples Business Advantage 02/17/201746425 3327445053 Office Supplies Office Supplies -69.90 3327445055 Office Supplies Office Supplies -45.98 3327606887 Office Supplies Office Supplies 185.79 3327606893 Office Supplies Office Supplies 48.99 118.90Total for Check Number 46425: UB*00195 Kathleen Wehking 02/17/201746426 Refund Check 5.76 5.76Total for Check Number 46426: 0101 Winnick Supply 02/17/201746427 333562 PW Supplies PW Supplies 372.84 372.84Total for Check Number 46427: 15,300.62Total for 2/17/2017: 0189 Gopher State One-Call, Inc.02/23/2017ACH 7010161 Jan 17 Locates Jan 17 Locates 21.60 7010161 Jan 17 Locates Jan 17 Locates 21.60 7010161 Jan 17 Locates Jan 17 Locates 21.60 64.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0225 Lillie Suburban Newspapers 02/23/2017ACH 01312017-LSN Jan 17 Publications Jan 17 Publications 39.88 01312017-LSN Jan 17 Publications Jan 17 Publications 141.38 181.26Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0225: 0285 Xcel Energy 02/23/2017ACH 533168249 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 1,599.99 533168249 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 1,904.92 533168249 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 1,920.41 533168249 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 1,336.51 533168249 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 885.50 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 7,647.33Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0292 Oxygen Service Company, Inc.02/23/2017ACH 03364534 Jan 17 Rental Fees Jan 17 Rental Fees 19.22 19.22Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0320 Health Partners 02/23/2017ACH 71098228 March 2017 Premium March 2017 Premium 1,001.39 1,001.39Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0387 ICMA Retirement Trust- #302482 02/23/2017ACH PR Batch 00200.02.2017 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.02.2017 ICMA Employee Percent 352.44 PR Batch 00200.02.2017 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.02.2017 ICMA Employee Deduction 25.00 377.44Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0478 Truck Utilities Mfg. Company 02/23/2017ACH 0307442 PW Supplies PW Supplies 225.92 225.92Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0478: 0750 Verizon Wireless 02/23/2017ACH 9779950021 Jan/Feb Expenses Jan/Feb Expenses 120.10 120.10Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 0922 North Suburban Access Corporation 02/23/2017ACH 17-004 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 257.40 257.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 1041 Aaron Thelen 02/23/2017ACH 02172017-AT 2/6-2/16 Mileage 2/6-2/16 Mileage 75.97 75.97Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1041: 12018 Achieve Services 02/23/2017ACH 13429 Document Shredding Document Shredding 17.20 17.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 12018: 1223 Adam's Pest Control, Inc.02/23/2017ACH 2493404 Feb 17 Pest Control Feb 17 Pest Control 62.54 62.54Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1223: 6060 Batteries Plus 02/23/2017ACH 028-481530 PW Supplies PW Supplies 120.95 120.95Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6060: 7501 Kelly & Lemmons, P.A.02/23/2017ACH 46466 Jan 17 Prosecution Jan 17 Prosecution 1,505.99 1,505.99Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: 8023 Voss Lighting 02/23/2017ACH 15296986-00 City Hall Expenses City Hall Expenses 40.90 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 40.90Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8023: A1HY A-1 Hydraulic Sales & Service 02/23/2017ACH 0112076-IN PW Supplies PW Supplies 18.37 18.37Total for this ACH Check for Vendor A1HY: 5593 American Legal Publishing Corp.02/23/201746428 0112481-2016 MN Code of Ordinances MN Code of Ordinances 9.00 9.00Total for Check Number 46428: 5597 CoBeck Construction Company, LLC 02/23/201746429 2014-00214 2014-00214 GE Escrow Release 2014-00214 GE Escrow Release 3,038.32 3,038.32Total for Check Number 46429: IREK Kyle Irestone 02/23/201746430 2014-01015 GE 2014-01015 Escrow Release GE 2014-01015 Escrow Release 2,876.91 2,876.91Total for Check Number 46430: 6984 Lang Builders 02/23/201746431 2015-00977 2015-00977 GE Escrow Release 2015-00977 GE Escrow Release 3,600.00 3,600.00Total for Check Number 46431: 2218 Telecom Construction Inc 02/23/201746432 2016-00508 2016-00508 ROW Escrow Release 2016-00508 ROW Escrow Release 1,000.00 1,000.00Total for Check Number 46432: APPB Apple Business Forms, Inc.02/23/201746433 10923 Window Envelopes Window Envelopes 287.11 287.11Total for Check Number 46433: CANON Canon Financial Services 02/23/201746434 16990860 Mar 17 Rental Mar 17 Rental 383.32 16990860 Mar 17 Rental Mar 17 Rental 2,172.15 2,555.47Total for Check Number 46434: 9009 International Code Council, Inc Attn Membership02/23/201746435 3135956 2017 Dues 2017 Dues 135.00 135.00Total for Check Number 46435: 5518 KorTerra, Inc.02/23/201746436 17146 2017 Mapping Service Fee 2017 Mapping Service Fee 500.00 17146 2017 Mapping Service Fee 2017 Mapping Service Fee 500.00 17146 2017 Mapping Service Fee 2017 Mapping Service Fee 500.00 1,500.00Total for Check Number 46436: 5138 League of MN Cities Ins. Trust 02/23/201746437 10002593-2017 2017 Worker's Comp Payment 2017 Worker's Comp Payment 33,085.00 33,085.00Total for Check Number 46437: 5443 Metro Products, Inc.02/23/201746438 123358 PW Supplies PW Supplies 191.57 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 191.57Total for Check Number 46438: 1208 Premium Waters, Inc 02/23/201746439 610207-01-17 Jan 17 City Hall Supplies Jan 17 City Hall Supplies 57.99 613317-01-17 Jan 17 City Hall Supplies Jan 17 City Hall Supplies 89.13 147.12Total for Check Number 46439: 3100 Provident Life and Accident Ins Co 02/23/201746440 9672443-0117 Jan 17 UNUM Premium Jan 17 UNUM Premium 85.10 85.10Total for Check Number 46440: 6748 Reliance Standard 02/23/201746441 GL154938-0317 Mar 17 Premium Mar 17 Premium 1,165.73 1,165.73Total for Check Number 46441: 9111 Safe Assure Consultants Inc.02/23/201746442 1151 Safety Training Safety Training 1,951.79 1,951.79Total for Check Number 46442: 1193 SelectAccount 02/23/201746443 1175462 Jan/Feb 17 Participant Fees Jan/Feb 17 Participant Fees 63.30 63.30Total for Check Number 46443: 0327 Staples Business Advantage 02/23/201746444 3328187057 Office Supplies Office Supplies 199.11 199.11Total for Check Number 46444: 0925 T-Mobile 02/23/201746445 02222017-TMobil Feb 17 Tablet Charges Feb 17 Tablet Charges 28.70 28.70Total for Check Number 46445: 0576 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 02/23/201746446 M22649 1/17 CC Mtg 1/17 CC Mtg 207.00 207.00Total for Check Number 46446: 3099 Tri-State Bobcat, Inc.-Little Canada 02/23/201746447 A30467 PW Supplies PW Supplies 139.86 139.86Total for Check Number 46447: 9755 Verizon Networkfleet Inc 02/23/201746448 OSV000000604535 Jan 17 GPS Expenses Jan 17 GPS Expenses 360.05 360.05Total for Check Number 46448: 64,362.92Total for 2/23/2017: 0602 US BANK 03/01/2017ACH 010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 21.18 Arvidson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 180.00 Christof-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 44.56 Christof-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 103.20 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription Grant-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 9.62 Hanson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 150.00 Hanson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 265.00 Hanson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 475.00 Hanson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 125.20 Hanson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 50.00 Iverson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 380.00 Iverson-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 60.00 Mikacevi-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 15.00 Mikacevi-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 37.48 Scherbel-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 9.63 Scherbel-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 106.49 Scherbel-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 9.63 Schifsky-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 334.09 Schifsky-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 68.48 Schifsky-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 230.00 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 66.98 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 47.12 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 4.17 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 130.00 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses -59.94 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 22.55 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 25.67 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 18.99 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 31.55 Thelen-010217 Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses Jan/Feb 17 CC Expenses 238.62 3,200.27Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0602: 3,200.27Total for 3/1/2017: 0008 Joseph Mooney 03/02/2017ACH 02282017-JM Uniform Reimbursement Uniform Reimbursement 125.00 125.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0008: 0210 Kath Fuel Oil Service 03/02/2017ACH 582021 PW Supplies PW Supplies 94.00 94.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0210: 0750 Verizon Wireless 03/02/2017ACH 9780164644 Jan/Feb 17 Expenses Jan/Feb 17 Expenses 962.58 962.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 0940 Zee Medical Services 03/02/2017ACH 54058033 City Hall/PW Supplies City Hall/PW Supplies 16.55 54058033 City Hall/PW Supplies City Hall/PW Supplies 171.65 188.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0940: 1001 Sprint/Nextel Communications 03/02/2017ACH 196110738-045 Jan/Feb 17 Expenses Jan/Feb 17 Expenses 169.20 169.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1001: 1252 Campbell Knutson - Attorneys at Law 03/02/2017ACH 3231G-0117 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 345.00 3231G-0117 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 300.00 Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 3231G-0117 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 225.00 3231G-0117 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 300.00 3231G-0117 Jan 17 Expenses Jan 17 Expenses 525.00 1,695.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1252: 1408 Supply Solutions 03/02/2017ACH 12845 City Hall Supplies City Hall Supplies 137.52 137.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1408: 5579 Bill Joynes 03/02/2017ACH 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 4,407.46 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 877.10 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 877.10 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 153.49 02282017-BJ Feb 17 Consultant Expenses Feb 17 Consultant Expenses 306.99 8,771.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5579: 8023 Voss Lighting 03/02/2017ACH 15297364-00 PW Supplies PW Supplies 100.00 100.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8023: 8032 Pace Analytical Field Svc 03/02/2017ACH 12170106 Jan 17 Drinking Water Jan 17 Drinking Water 726.75 726.75Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: ALPI Allegra Print & Imaging 03/02/2017ACH 150301 Jan/Feb Newsletter Jan/Feb Newsletter 1,585.44 1,585.44Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: 2597 AARP 03/02/201746449 02212017-AARP Feb 2017 AARP Class Feb 2017 AARP Class 110.00 110.00Total for Check Number 46449: 6047 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc 03/02/201746450 1584885 March 2017 Premium March 2017 Premium 11.40 11.40Total for Check Number 46450: 5659 Clifton Larson Allen, LLP 03/02/201746451 03012017-CLA Finance Training Finance Training 100.00 Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 100.00Total for Check Number 46451: 1033 Comcast 03/02/201746452 44271-020317 Feb/Mar Expenses Feb/Mar Expenses 6.34 6.34Total for Check Number 46452: 0390 INT'L Union Operating Engineers-Union Dues03/02/201746453 02082017-INT Feb 17 Dues Feb 17 Dues 272.00 272.00Total for Check Number 46453: 0217 Laden's Business Machines, Inc.03/02/201746454 8355 Check Signing Machine Services Check Signing Machine Services 312.50 312.50Total for Check Number 46454: 3547 Cheryl Ludwig 03/02/201746455 02172017-CL Ice Skating Refund Ice Skating Refund 10.00 10.00Total for Check Number 46455: 7025 On Site Sanitation 03/02/201746456 380364 2/25-3/24 Rental 2/25-3/24 Rental 149.00 149.00Total for Check Number 46456: 0811 Ramsey County 03/02/201746457 EMCOM-005796 Jan 17 911 Dispatch Services Jan 17 Fleet Support Fee 4,790.65 EMCOM-005811 Jan 17 CAD Services Jan 17 CAD Services 945.34 EMCOM-005827 Jan 17 Fleet Support Fee Jan 17 CAD Services 24.96 5,760.95Total for Check Number 46457: 3542 Snyder Electric 03/02/201746458 2016-00625 2016-00625 Electrical Permit Refund 2016-00625 Electrical Permit Refund 160.00 160.00Total for Check Number 46458: 0208 UniSelect USA 03/02/201746459 039192961 PW Supplies PW Supplies 28.21 28.21Total for Check Number 46459: 21,475.09Total for 3/2/2017: 0319 City of Roseville 03/10/2017ACH 0222499 Q4 2016 Water Expenses Q4 2016 Water Expenses 193,636.62 193,636.62Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 0230 MTI Distributing Co.03/10/2017ACH 1091181-02 PW Supplies PW Supplies 4,594.00 4,594.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0230: 0285 Xcel Energy 03/10/2017ACH 535311962 Jan/Feb 17 Expenses Jan/Feb 17 Expenses 2,082.54 2,082.54Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: Page 9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0339 Ferguson Waterworks 2516 03/10/2017ACH 0231339 PW Supplies PW Supplies 35.03 35.03Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0339: 0387 ICMA Retirement Trust- #302482 03/10/2017ACH PR Batch 00100.03.2017 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.03.2017 ICMA Employee Deduction 25.00 PR Batch 00100.03.2017 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.03.2017 ICMA Employee Percent 375.34 400.34Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0413 Newman Traffic Signs 03/10/2017ACH TI-0306750 PW Supplies PW Supplies 118.75 118.75Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0413: 0453 Continental Research Corp.03/10/2017ACH 445586-CRC-1 PW Supplies PW Supplies 1,495.00 1,495.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0453: 1041 Aaron Thelen 03/10/2017ACH 03062017-AT 2/21-2/18 Mileage 2/21-2/18 Mileage 24.61 24.61Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1041: 1110 Pitney Bowes 03/10/2017ACH 02232017-PB Feb 17 Expenses Feb 17 Expenses 601.92 02232017-PB Feb 17 Expenses Feb 17 Expenses 244.99 846.91Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1110: 4889 Community Footworks 03/10/2017ACH 03012017-CF March 2017 Foot Clinic March 2017 Foot Clinic 408.00 408.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 5587 CES Imaging 03/10/2017ACH INV056566 Feb 17 Expenses Feb 17 Expenses 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 6349 Mary Nosek 03/10/2017ACH 17-001 Jan/Feb 17 AH Notes Jan/Feb 17 AH Notes 140.00 140.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6349: 0242 Met Council Environ. Service-SAC 03/10/2017ACH 03072017-SAC Feb 17 SAC Report Feb 17 SAC Report 162,369.90 162,369.90Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0242: 0243 Metropolitan Council-Waste Water 03/10/2017ACH 1065075 April 2017 Wastewater April 2017 Wastewater 61,701.52 61,701.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0243: 0811 Ramsey County 03/10/201746461 PUBW-016033 I35W/Cty Rd 96 Expenses I35W/Cty Rd 96 Expenses 5,200.20 PUBW-016040 I35W/Cty Rd H Expenses I35W/Cty Rd H Expenses 166,735.36 PUBW-016048 Lex/Cty Rd F Expenses Lex/Cty Rd F Expenses 167,600.00 PUBW-016050 Lex/Cty Rd F Expenses Lex/Cty Rd F Expenses 91,439.55 Page 10AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 430,975.11Total for Check Number 46461: 4372 DLT Solutions, LLC 03/10/201746462 4560074A 2017 Agreement 2017 Agreement 1,046.37 1,046.37Total for Check Number 46462: 0841 Ehlers & Associates, Inc.03/10/201746463 72717 TCAAP Expenses P&Z Expenses 460.00 72718 P&Z Expenses P&Z Expenses 168.75 628.75Total for Check Number 46463: UB*00196 Marlene Fairchild 03/10/201746464 Refund Check 102.03 102.03Total for Check Number 46464: 0376 FirstLab 03/10/201746465 FL00166864 Drug Testing Drug Testing 250.00 250.00Total for Check Number 46465: 4949 GIS Workshop 03/10/201746466 2016-100894 Technology Expenses Technology Expenses 400.00 400.00Total for Check Number 46466: UB*00197 Heartland Credit Union 03/10/201746467 Refund Check 119.02 119.02Total for Check Number 46467: 0155 Office of MN IT Services 03/10/201746468 W17010685 Jan 17 Phone Bill Jan 17 Phone Bill 804.07 804.07Total for Check Number 46468: 3100 Provident Life and Accident Ins Co 03/10/201746469 9672443-0217 Feb 17 UNUM Payment Feb 17 UNUM Payment 85.10 85.10Total for Check Number 46469: UB*00198 John & Janet Stottlemeyer 03/10/201746470 Refund Check 166.03 166.03Total for Check Number 46470: 0576 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 03/10/201746471 M22685 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 207.00 M22685 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 139.00 M22685 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 1/30, 2/6, 2/8 Meetings 166.50 512.50Total for Check Number 46471: 0447 I.U.O.E Local 49 Benefit Fund-Insurance 03/10/201746472 03152017-IUOE April 2017 Premium April 2017 Premium 9,360.00 9,360.00Total for Check Number 46472: 0811 Ramsey County 03/10/201746473 SHRFL-001563 Jan 17 Sheriff Jan 17 Sheriff 98,147.73 Page 11AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription SHRFL-001572 Feb 17 Sheriff Feb 17 Sheriff 98,147.73 196,295.46Total for Check Number 46473: 1,068,657.66Total for 3/10/2017: Report Total (107 checks): 1,175,174.77 Page 12AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/8/2017 2:04 PM) CONSENT ITEM – 5B MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: Appointment of Public Works Superintendent Background At the February 13, 2017, City Council Meeting, the City Council authorized staff to advertise internally for the vacancy in the Public Works Superintendent position due to the resignation of Ken Novack. Discussion The City received one internal application for the Public Works Superintendent position. The City Administrator, Director of Finance and Administrative Services and the Public Works Director/City Engineer interviewed the applicant, Jeff Frid. Staff recommends appointing Jeff Frid to the position of Public Works Superintendent. Attached is a copy of his resume for your review. Recommendation 1. Staff recommends appointing Jeff Frid to the position of Public Works Superintendent for the City of Arden Hills at Pay Grade 15, Step 2. Attachment Attachment A: Jeff Frid’s resume CONSENT ITEM – 5C MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: Appointment of Customer Service Specialist Background At the January 9, 2017, City Council Meeting, the City Council authorized staff to advertise for the vacancy in the Customer Service Specialist position due to moving Britt Pease into the position of Office Support Specialist. Discussion In total, the City received 118 applications for the Customer Service Specialist position. Three rounds of interviews were held by various City staff, including the City Administrator. Staff’s recommendation is to appoint Sue Johnson. Attached is a copy of her application and resume for your review. References and Criminal background checks have been completed. Recommendation 1. Staff recommends appointing Sue Johnson to the position of Customer Service Specialist for the City of Arden Hills at Pay Grade 7, Step 7. Attachment Attachment A – Sue Johnson’s application and resume City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 1 of 4 CONSENT ITEM – 5D MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-002 Applicant: Boston Scientific Corporation Property Location: 4100 Hamline Avenue North Request: Site Plan Review Requested Action Motion to approve Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the three (3) conditions in the March 13, 2017, Report to the City Council. Background Boston Scientific has requested a Site Plan Review to construct a new parking and drop-off area to the east of the existing Building 10, between Innovation Way and the building. The new parking area will provide short-term parking and curbside drop-off for the daycare facility located in Building 10, and will help address existing safety concerns associated with parents dropping off children for daycare. The project will include the construction of 7 parking stalls and 3 curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. Additional landscaping and exterior lighting will also be installed for the new parking area and sidewalks. The applicant has submitted a project narrative describing the request (Attachment A) and a development plan set (Attachment C) indicating the existing and proposed conditions of the property. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 2 of 4 Plan Review A Site Plan Review is required by the City’s Zoning Code for the reorganization of parking, drives, and entrances within any industrial district. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on February 8, 2017. The staff report to the Planning Commission is included in Attachment E. The proposed parking area is in conformance with the approved PUD for the campus and the underlying I-1 Zoning District regulations. The Planning Commission requested that Boston Scientific provide additional information on the exterior lighting for the parking area for the City Council’s review of this case. A photometric plan of the parking area and information on the proposed light fixtures are included in Attachment D. The proposed lighting meets the design standards included in Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. City Engineer The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. Lake Johanna Fire Department The Lake Johanna Fire Marshall reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. Rice Creek Watershed District Boston Scientific has a permit in place from the Rice Creek Watershed District that includes the proposed parking and drop-off area. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 17-002 at their regular meeting on February 8, 2017. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment F. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Site Plan Review in order to construct a new parking and drop-off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. 2. A Site Plan Review is required by the City’s Zoning Code for the reorganization of parking, drives, and entrances within any industrial district. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 3 of 4 3. The Boston Scientific campus is a conforming use in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District and operates under an approved PUD Overlay District. 4. The parking area would include seven parking stalls and three curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. 5. The proposal is conformance with the landscape lot area requirements for properties in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District as required by Section 1320.06 of the Zoning Code. 6. The proposal is in conformance with the off-public street parking requirements included in Section 1325.06, Subd. 1 of the Zoning Code. 7. The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood or the City as a whole. Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval (5-0) of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the March 13, 2017, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following three (3) conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall continue to abide by all previous agreements, as amended by the conditions of approval of this application. 3. Exterior lighting shall conform to the design standards included in Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code. Options 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Approve the proposal with conditions (Recommended Action). 3. Deny the application with reasons for denial. 4. Table for additional information. Public Comments Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 4 of 4 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 9, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by March 10, 2017 (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The applicant was notified on February 14, 2017 of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by May 9, 2017. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Site and Aerial Map C. Project Plan Set D. Photometric Plan and Proposed Light Fixtures E. Planning Commission Report, February 8, 2017 F. Draft Planning Commission Minutes, February 8, 2017 MEMORANDUM COMM. NO.: 6131.001.28 CLIENT: Boston Scientific PROJECT: Daycare parking lot SUBJECT: Land Use Application Narrative MEMO BY: Joe Ford, RSP Architects DATE: January 6, 2017 ATTENTION: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner, City of Arden Hills COPY: Lorne Rothbauer, Boston Scientific Boston Scientific proposes to construct a new parking and drop-off area to the east of their existing Building 10, between the building and Innovation Way. The purpose of the new parking area is to provide off-street short-term parking and curbside drop-off for the day care facility on the first floor of Building 10. The off-street parking area will resolve existing safety issues where parents dropping off children for day care must use on-street stalls along Innovation Way and have to back into a traffic lane to exit the on- street stalls. The scope of the project includes: 7 parking stalls, 3 curb-side drop-off spaces, and associated driveways and sidewalks. Additional work includes landscaping and exterior lighting at the new parking and sidewalk areas. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 2,666.7 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet2,666.701,333.33 Notes Enter Map Description Legend4100 Hamline Avenue North City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries Airports Parks (8-64K) State Park Regional Parks, Preserves, and Open Spaces County Park Local Parks Golf Course Special Use Facility Rec Center This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 1,333.3 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet1,333.30666.67 Notes Enter Map Description Legend4100 Hamline Avenue North City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries Airports Parks (8-64K) State Park Regional Parks, Preserves, and Open Spaces County Park Local Parks Golf Course Special Use Facility Rec Center DOCUMENT PACKAGE ISSUED: 6 JANUARY, 2017 CITY SUBMITTAL LOCATION MAP NORTH PROJECT SITE 0 0 Name Elevation ELEVATION / LEVEL TAG 1 REVISION REFERENCE MATCH LINE SEE X/XXX MATCH LINE XX X X PARTITION TAG T.O. FOOTING EL. = 96'-0" DRAWING TITLE NORTH ARROW A101 1 SIM 1 A101 SIM ELEVATION TAG - SINGLE VIEW A101 1 ELEVATION TAG - MULTIPLE VIEW A101 2 DETAIL TAG WALL SECTION TAG 1 A101 SIM BUILDING SECTION TAG ENLARGED PLAN OR DETAIL REFERENCE A101 1 SIM 234 ROOM TAG KEYNOTE 1t WINDOW TAG EQUIPMENT TAG 101 DOOR TAG FINISH TAG - WITH EXTENT OF FINISH FINISH TAG - ALL SURFACES FINISH TRANSITION VB1 CPT1 CPT-01 CPT-02 VIEW NAME 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 NORTH XX EL. = 100'-0" SPOT ELEVATION 0 COLUMN OR GRID LINE - NEW COLUMN OR GRID LINE - EXISTING 0 23 ROOM NAME 101 150 SF PNT1 CPT1 VB1 (WALL FINISH) (BASE FINISH) (FLOOR FINISH) (ROOM NAME) (ROOM NUMBER) (ROOM AREA) 1 NORTH DRAWING SYMBOLS OWNER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CoBeck Construction 218 13th Avenue South South St. Paul, MN 55075 Phone: 651-756-7521 Contact: Jim Fishbeck ARCHITECT RSP Architects, Ltd. 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 Phone: 612-677-7100 Contact: Joe Ford joseph.ford@rsparch.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER Rehder & Associates, Inc. 3440 Federal Drive Suite 110 Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651-452-5051 Contact: John Krausert DAMON FARBER 401 N 2nd Avenue South Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: 612-332-7522 Contact: Chuck Evens Boston Scientific 4100 Hamline Avenue N Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phone: 651.582.2963 Contact: Lorne Rothbauer PROJECT TEAM Project No. Revisions 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com RSP Architects Certification Project For I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Registration Number Signature Drawn By Checked By Date NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved. Consultants 1/6/2017 1:29:17 PM C:\Revit Projects\A16_Bldg3-10 Link_JFord.rvt G001 COVER SHEET DAYCARE PARKING DAYCARE PARKING ADDITION 6131.001.28 JRF JAL JANUARY 6, 2017 CITY SUBMITTAL No. Date Description 2017/01/06 CITY SUBMITTAL RSP PROJECT NUMBER: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DAYCARE PARKING ADDITION 4100 HAMLINE AVENUE N. ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 6131.001.28 DRAWINGS ISSUES SHEET NO. NAME S I T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L - 0 1 - 0 6 - 1 7 G001 COVER SHEET X G020 PARKING & SITE AREA CALCULATIONS X A010 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN X C001 CIVIL GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN X L050 GENERAL NOTES, MATERIAL SCHEDULE & PLANTING SCHEDULE X L200 LANDSCAPE PLAN X L415 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN X L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS X 428 13 6 S P A C E S 331 260 I N N O V A T I O N W A Y 7 SPACES Project No. Revisions 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com RSP Architects Certification Project For I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Registration Number Signature Drawn By Checked By Date NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved. Consultants 12/19/2016 4:03:06 PM C:\Revit Projects\A16_Bldg3-10 Link_JFord.rvt G020 PARKING & SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDING 3-10 LINK 6131.001.28 JRF JAL 6 JANUARY 2017 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1" = 100'-0" PROOF OF PARKING 1 No. Date Description 7 2016/11/04 CCD NO.7 0'100'50'100'200' SCALE : 1" = 100'-0" NORTH x x x x x I N N O V A T I O N W A Y BLDG. 10 BLDG. 3 P R O P E R T Y L I N E EASEMENT 84'-0" 8' - 0" 12' - 0" 24' - 0" 20' - 0" 7' - 0" EXIST TRANSFORMER LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK DAY CARE ENTRY 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 2 ' - 0 " AREA OF WORK I N N O V A T I O N W A Y BL D G . 1 0 8' - 0" 12' - 0" 24' - 0" 20' - 0" 7' - 0" EXISTING TRANSFORMER T Y P 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 2 ' - 0 " EXISTING TRANSFORMER 6 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 6' - 0 " R 2 0 ' - 0 " R 20' - 0" R 1 5 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " R 12' - 0" R 1 5 ' - 0 " R 15' - 0" R 5 ' - 0 " R 2 5 ' - 0 " R 1 5' - 0 " 8' - 0" 6' - 6" 3' - 0" 1 1 1 2 3 EX S T . NE W E X S T . N E W E X S T . N E W E X S T . N E W 4 GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN 1. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING, DRAINAGE & SITE UTILITY INFORMATION. 2. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PLANTING PLANS AND SCHEDULES. Project No. Revisions 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com RSP Architects Certification Project For I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Registration Number Signature Drawn By Checked By Date NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved. Consultants 1/6/2017 1:23:37 PM C:\Revit Projects\A16_Bldg3-10 Link_JFord.rvt A010 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DAYCARE PARKING DAYCARE PARKING ADDITION 6131.001.28 JRF JAL 01/06/2017 CITY SUBMITTAL No. Date Description 2017/01/06 CITY SUBMITTAL 1" = 30'-0" SITE PLAN - DAYCARE PARKING 1 NORTH 30'15'0'30'60' SCALE : 1" = 30'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" ENLARGED SITE PLAN - DAYCARE PARKING 2 NORTH 0' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" 16'8'16'32' KEYNOTES - SITE PLAN NO. DESCRIPTION 1 12" WIDE TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP 2 YELLOW CROSSWALK STRIPING 3 RECONFIGURE & EXTEND EXISTING MODULAR RETAINING WALL TO MATCH NEW SIDEWALK EXTENTS 4 IRON GRATE OVER CURB DRAINAGE CUT - SEE CIVIL C O N I F E R O U S S H R U B S J h J U N I P E R U S H O R I Z O N T A L I S ' B L U E C H I P ' J U N I P E R , B L U E C H I P # 5 C o n t . 4 ' O . C . ( G R O U N D C O V E R 1 0 " H x 6 ' W ) J w J U N I P E R U S S C O P U L O R U M ' W E L C H I ' J U N I P E R , W E L C H I # 1 0 C o n t . 4 ' O . C . D E C I D U O U S S H R U B S A m A R O N I A M E L A N C O C A R P A E L A T A C H O K E B E R R Y , B L A C K # 5 C o n t . 4 ' O . C . D l D I E R V I L L A L O N I C E R A D W A R F B U S H H O N E Y S U C K L E # 5 C o n t . 4 ' O . C . R a R H U S A R O M A T I C A ' G R O - L O W ' S U M A C , G R O - L O W F R A G R A N T # 5 C o n t . 4 ' O . C . P E R E N N I A L S R p R A T I B I A P I N N A T A Y E L L O W C O N E F L O W E R 5 " P O T 1 8 " O . C . ( G R O W S 6 0 " H X 2 4 " W ) S s S O L I D A G O S P E C I O S A S H O W Y G O L D E N R O D 5 " P O T 1 8 " O . C . ( G R O W S 3 6 " H X 3 6 " W ) V h V E R B E N A H A S T A T A B L U E V E R V A I N 5 " P O T 1 8 " O . C . ( G R O W S 6 0 " H X 2 4 " W ) P E R E N N I A L G R A S S E S C p C A R E X P E N N S Y L V A N I C A S E D G E , O A K # 1 C o n t . 1 8 " O . C . C v C A R E X V U L P I N O I D E A S E D G E , F O X # 1 C o n t . 2 4 " O . C . J e J U N C U S E F F U S E S G R A S S , C O M M O N R U S H # 1 C o n t . 2 4 " O . C . P v P A N I C U M V I R G A T U M ' N O R T H W I N D S ' G R A S S , S W I T C H # 1 C o n t . 3 0 " O . C . S c S C H I Z A C H Y R I U M S C O P A R I U M G R A S S , L I T T L E B L U E S T E M # 1 C o n t . 2 4 " O . C . S h S P O R O B O L U S H E T E R O L E P I S G R A S S , P R A I R I E D R O P S E E D # 1 C o n t . 2 4 " O . C . P L A N T I N G S C H E D U L E S Y M B O L Q T Y S C I E N T I F I C N A M E C O M M O N N A M E S I Z E S P A C I N G N O T E S S H A D E T R E E S A f 1 A C E R X F R E E M A N I I ' S I E N N A ' M A P L E , S I E N N A G L E N 3 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G C c 1 C A R P I N U S C A R O L I N I A N A H O R N B E A M , A M E R I C A N ( B L U E B E E C H ) 2 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G G d 1 G Y M N O C L A D U S D I O I C U S ' E S P R E S S O ' C O F F E E T R E E , K E N T U C K Y 3 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G J n 2 J U G L A N S N I G R A B L A C K W A L N U T 2 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G Q m 2 Q U E R C U S M A C R O C A R P A O A K , B U R 4 . 0 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G Q r 1 Q U E R C U S R U B R A O A K , R E D 2 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G U a 1 U L M U S A M E R I C A N A ' T r i u m p h ' E L M , T R I U M P H 2 . 5 " C A L . L . A . T O F I E L D T A G O R N A M E N T A L T R E E S A g 3 A M E L A N C H I E R X G R A N D I F L O R A ' A U T U M N B R I L L I A N C E ' S E R V I C E B E R R Y , A U T U M N B R I L L I A N C E 1 2 ' H G T . M U L T I - S T E M , 1 2 ' - 1 4 ' H T . , S E V E N O R M O R E B R A N C H E S C O N I F E R O U S T R E E S P r 1 P I N U S R E S I N O S A P I N E , R E D 1 2 ' H G T . E q u a t e s t o 5 " c a l i p e r p e r c o d e P s 3 P I N U S S Y L V E S T R I S P I N E , S C O T C H 1 2 ' H G T . E q u a t e s t o 5 " c a l i p e r p e r c o d e M A T E R I A L S S C H E D U L E S Y M B O L / A B B R E V I A T I O N E L E M E N T M A T E R I A L P R O F I L E / A S S E M B L Y S U M M A R Y P R O D U C T S / M A N U F A C T U R E R M O C K U P N O T E S M I N E R A L M U L C H M I N E R A L M U L C H - T Y P E 1 9 - 1 2 " A N G U L A R S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E 1 2 " L A Y E R A N G U L A R S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E , F I L T E R F A B R I C , C O M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E P R O D U C T : S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E M A N U F A C T U R E R : M A R T I N M A R I E T T A M I N E R A L M U L C H - T Y P E 2 4 - 6 " A N G U L A R S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E 1 2 " L A Y E R A N G U L A R S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E , F I L T E R F A B R I C , C O M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E P R O D U C T : S T . C L O U D G R A N I T E M A N U F A C T U R E R : M A R T I N M A R I E T T A E D G E S & C U R B S E D G I N G - T Y P E 1 5 " X 1 4 " G A L V . S T E E L E D G E , W I T H 1 6 " S T A K E S E D G I N G - T Y P E 2 5 " P O L Y L A N D S C A P E E D G I N G W I T H 9 " S T A K E S A N D 1 " R O U N D T O P P R O F I L E M A N U F A C T U R E R : V A L L E Y V I E W I N D U S T R I E S C U R B - T Y P E 1 9 " W I D E B Y 1 8 " D E E P C O N C R E T E C U R B , 6 " D E E P B Y 1 2 " W I D E C O M P A C T E D C L A S S V B A S E , C O M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E 1 2 " R A D I U S E D G E S , 2 # 4 B A R C O N T I N U O U S 1 E D G - 1 E D G - 2 C R B - 1 2 P r o j e c t N o . R e v i s i o n s 1 2 2 0 M a r s h a l l S t r e e t N E M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 3 - 1 0 3 6 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 1 0 0 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 4 9 9 f a x w w w . r s p a r c h . c o m R S P A r c h i t e c t s C e r t i f i c a t i o n P r o j e c t F o r I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . D a t e R e g i s t r a t i o n N u m b e r S i g n a t u r e D r a w n B y C h e c k e d B y D a t e N O T I C E : T h e d e s i g n s s h o w n a n d d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n i n c l u d i n g a l l t e c h n i c a l d r a w i n g s , g r a p h i c s , a n d m o d e l s t h e r e o f , a r e p r o p r i e t a r y a n d c a n n o t b e c o p i e d , d u p l i c a t e d o r c o m m e r c i a l l y e x p l o i t e d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , w i t h o u t e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f R S P A r c h i t e c t s . T h e s e a r e a v a i l a b l e f o r l i m i t e d r e v i e w a n d e v a l u a t i o n b y c l i e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , c o n t r a c t o r s , g o v e r n m e n t a g e n c i e s , v e n d o r s a n d o f f i c e p e r s o n n e l o n l y i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h i s N o t i c e . © C o p y r i g h t R S P A r c h i t e c t s 2 0 1 5 . A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . C o n s u l t a n t s L 0 5 0 G E N E R A L N O T E S , M A T E R I A L S C H E D U L E & P L A N T I N G S C H E D U L E B L D G 3 - B L D G 1 0 L I N K 6 1 3 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 C E C h e c k e r 2 7 M A Y 2 0 1 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 4 0 1 2 n d A v e n u e N o r t h , S u i t e 4 1 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 P 6 1 2 . 3 3 2 . 7 5 2 2 GENERAL NOTESCONTRACT DOCUMENTS1.THE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.2.THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY. READ THEDRAWINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS ANDEXECUTE THE WORK AS THOUGH SHOWN ON ALL.3.THE WORK IS DEPENDENT ON SEVERAL DISCIPLINES. READ THEDRAWINGS BY CROSS-REFERENCING BETWEEN DISCIPLINES.4.REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE FOR DIRECTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THEWORK.SITE ACCESS & PROTECTION1.STAGING AREA IS WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMIT LINE. STAGING AREADOES NOT INCLUDE ACCESS ROUTES TO THE SITE. THECONSTRUCTION (AND REMOVAL) OF TEMPORARY STAGING AREASAND/OR ACCESS ROUTES SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLERESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE.2.ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED VEHICLES REQUIRED FOR THE WORKEXITING AND/OR ENTERING THE SITE SHALL NOT DEPOSIT DIRT,MUD, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS THAT WOULD PRESENT ANUISANCE OR HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC TRAVELING ON RIGHT OFWAYS. ALL PREVENTION AND CLEANING SHALL BE THECONRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE.3.NO WORK, EQUIPMENT OR STAGING IS PERMITTED IN THE RIGHT OFWAY AT ANY TIME UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS APPROVAL FROMTHE GTOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. ALLCOORDINATION PERMITS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED SHALLBE THE CONRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE.4.THE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY SAFETY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,METHODS OR SEQUENCING TO PROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY.IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY ANDEXPENSE TO DIRECT AND IMPLEMENT SAFETY OPERATIONS TOPROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY.QUALITY ASSURANCE1.EXECUTE THE WORK AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS IN ACCORDANCEWITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL STANDARDS,LAWS AND REGULATIONS.2.ENSURE SUBCONTRACTORS, MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERSHAVE THE LATEST CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO THESUBMITTAL OF THEIR SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DELEGATED DESIGNDRAWINGS.3.REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTALS,INSPECTIONS AND NOTICE TO PROCEED.EXISTING CONDTIONS SURVEY1.THE DOCUMENTS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING TOPOGRAPHICAND UTILITY SURVEY:·2.SURVEYED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE PROVIDED FORINFORMATION ONLY AS THEY ARE INFERRED BY SURFACEMARKINGS AND FEATURES AND AS SUCH MAY NOT BE ACCURATE ORCOMPLETE.GEOTECHNICAL REPORT1.THE DOCUMENTS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING GEOTECHNICALREPORTS:·2.THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS ARE MADE AVAILABLE FORINFORMATION ONLY AS SOME RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE REPORTMAY NOT BE RELEVANT OR USED IN THE DOCUMENTS.UTILITIES1.THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF EXISTING UTILITIES (IF SHOWN) AREAPPROXIMATE ONLY. IDENTIFY, LOCATE AND PROTECT ALLUNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES TO REMAIN.2.COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND/ORAGENCIES. CALL YOUR LOCAL '811' OR REQUEST LOCATES ONLINENO LESS THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING TO LOCATEUNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCALREGULATIONS.3.BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ANY AND ALL DAMAGESWHICH OCCUR AS A RESULT OF A FAILURE TO ACCURATELY LOCATEAND/OR RETAIN ANY AND/OR ALL UTILITIES TO REMAIN.LAYOUT1.THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR THE PROJECT IS: STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD83) UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. 2 . T H E V E R T I C A L C O N T O R L F O R T H E P R O J E C T I S : N O R T H A M E R I C A N V E R T I C A L D A T U M ( N A V 8 8 ) O R N A T I O N A L G E O D E T I C D A T U M ( N G D V 2 9 ) U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . 3 . V E R I F Y T H E L O C A T I O N O F E X I S T I N G F E A T U R E S T O R E M A I N T H A T C O N N E C T T O N E W W O R K , A L L D I M E N S I O N A L C L E A R A N C E S , S E T B A C K S A N D O F F S E T S A N D V E R T I C A L D A T U M . R E P O R T A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S I M M E D I A T E L Y T O T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E F O R D I R E C T I O N B E F O R E P R O C E E D I N G W I T H T H A T P O R T I O N O F T H E W O R K . 4 . V E R I F Y A L L P R E V I O U S U N D E R L Y I N G T R A D E W O R K C O N F O R M S T O T H E D O C U M E N T S P R I O R T O P R O C E E D I N G W I T H O V E R L Y I N G T R A D E W O R K . R E P O R T A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S I M M E D I A T E L Y T O T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E F O R D I R E C T I O N B E F O R E P R O C E E D I N G W I T H T H A T P O R T I O N O F T H E W O R K . 5 . G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L R E T A I N S U R V E Y C O N T R O L F O R L A Y O U T O F T H E W O R K S A N D A S - B U I L T S U R V E Y S . 6 . C O O R D I N A T E A N D C O L L A T E S U B C O N T R A C T O R ' S S U R V E Y S . I T I S T H E C O N T R A C T O R ' S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y T O F I E L D V E R I F Y E X I S T I N G S I T E C O N D I T I O N S A N D E V O L V I N G S I T E C O N D I T I O N S P R I O R T O T H E S T A R T O F A N Y S I T E W O R K . A N Y D I S C R E P A N C Y A N D / O R U N F O R E S E E N C O N D I T I O N S F O U N D S H A L L B E B R O U G H T T O T H E I M M E D I A T E A T T E N T I O N O F T H E W O N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E P R I O R T O S T A R T I N G T H E S I T E W O R K . D O N O T B E G I N W O R K I N A Y S U C H A F F E C T E D A R E A U N T I L T H E D I S C R E P A N C Y H A S B E E N R E S O L V E D . 7 . E R E C T A N D I N S T A L L A L L W O R K L E V E L , P L U M B , S Q U A R E , T R U E , S T R I G H T A N D I N P R O P E R A L I G N M E N T . 8 . D O N O T S C A L E F R O M D R A W I N G S . U S E D I M E N S I O N S S H O W N A N D / O R S U P P L I E D C A D D R A W I N G F I L E A N D S U R V E Y I N T E R P O L A T I O N . 9 . D I M E N S I O N S N O T E D [ C L R ] O R C L E A R M U S T B E S T R I C T L Y M A I N T A I N E D A L L O W I N G F O R T H I C K N E S S O F A L L F I N I S H E S . F I E L D V E R I F Y P R I O R T O C O N T R U C T I O N . 1 0 . A L L A N G L E S A R E 9 0 D E G R E E S U N L E S S N O T E D O T H E R W I S E . 1 1 . A L L C U R V E S F O R P A V I N G , B A N D S , P A T H S , E D G I N G A N D H E A D E R B O A R D S S H A L L B E S M O O T H A N D C O N T I N U O U S W I T H O U T A B R U P T C H A N G E S , O B V I O U S T A N G E N T S O R B E N D S . 1 2 . P I T C H E V E N L Y B E T W E E N S P O T G R A D E S A N D C O N T O U R L I N E S U N L E S S G R A D E B R E A K S , R I D G E L I N E S , S W A L E S A R E I N D I C A T E D O R O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . A L L P A V E D A R E A S S H A L L P I T C H A T A M I N I M U M O F 1 % U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D O N D R A W I N G S . A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S O R C O N D I T I O N S N O T A L L O W I N G T H I S T O O C C U R S H A L L B E R E P O R T E D T O T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E F O R R E S O L U T I O N S P R I O R T O C O N T I N U I N G W O R K . 1 3 . P E D E S T R I A N S I D E W A L K S A N D P A V I N G S H A L L H A V E A C R O S S P I T C H L E S S T H A N 2 % U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D T O M E E T A D A R E Q U I R E M E N T S . 1 4 . R E Q U E S T A F I E L D R E V I E W B Y T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T O F T H E L A Y O U T O F E L E M E N T S A S S H O W N . O B T A I N L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T ' S A P P R O V A L O F L A Y O U T B E F O R E I N S T A L L I N G T H E F O L L O W I N G : · F I R S T T Y P I C A L S I T E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S , J U N C T I O N B O X E S , T R A N S F O R M E R S , · F I R S T T Y P I C A L S I T E U T I L I T Y F I X T U R E S , I N C L U D I N G B U T N O T L I M I T E D T O B O X E S , V A U L T S , P U L L B O X E S , M A N H O L E S , A I R R E L E A S E V A L V E S , V E N T S , B F P , A N D O T H E R C I V I L , M E C H A N I C A L , E L E C T R I C A L , P L U M B I N G , T E L E C O M , H E A T I N G / C O O L I N G , A N D I R R I G A T I O N S T R U C T U R E S , · F I R S T T Y P I C A L F O R M W O R K O F W A L L S , · A L L T R E E L O C A T I O N S . S T A K E A L L T R E E L O C A T I O N S . O B T A I N A P P R O V A L O F L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T B E F O R E P L A N T I N G T R E E S . · F I R S T T Y P I C A L C U R V E D E D G I N G A N D C U T T I N G , · F I R S T T Y P I C A L E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S I N C O N C R E T E P A V I N G , 1 5 . C O O R D I N A T E P L A N T L A Y O U T W I T H I R R I G A T I O N E Q U I P M E N T L A Y O U T . P L A N T L A Y O U T T A K E S P R E C E D E N C E O V E R I R R I G A T I O N E Q U I P M E N T L A Y O U T . W A T E R I N G 1 . A R E A S N O T S H O W N T O B E I R R I G A T E D P E R M A N E N T L Y B U T A R E P L A N T E D S H A L L B E W A T E R E D B Y T E M P O R A R Y M E A N S U N T I L P L A N T S A R E E S T A B L I S H E D . 2 . T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R I N G M E A N S , M E T H O D S , A N D S C H E D U L I N G S H A L L B E T H E C O N T R A C T O R ' S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y . R E M O V E A L L T E M P O R A R Y W A T E R I N G E Q U I P M E N T U P O N P L A N T E S T A B L I S H M E N T . W O R K B Y O T H E R S 1 . C O O P E R A T E A N D C O O R D I N A T E W I T H O T H E R C O N T R A C T O R S W O R K I N G C O N C U R R E N T L Y S O A S T O N O T V I O L A T E E A C H O T H E R ' S P E R M I T S A N D T O A V O I D D A M A G E T O E A C H O T E H R ' S W O R K . 2 . E A C H C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L P R O T E C T A N D M A I N T A I N T H E I R O W N W O R K F O R T H E D U R A T I O N O F T H E I R C O N T R A C T S . C O D E C O M P L I A N C E 1 . A L L W O R K S H A L L B E I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H A P P L I C A B L E L A W S , C O D E S A N D R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F R E G U L A T O R Y A G E N C I E S H A V I N G J U R I S D I C T I O N . 2 . N O T I F Y T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O F A N Y D I S C R E P A N C Y B E T W E E N T H E W O R K A N D A P P L I C A B L E C O D E S . D O N O T W O R K I N A N Y S U C H A F F E C T E D A R E A U N T I L T H E D I S C R E P A N C Y H A S B E E N R E S O L V E D . 3 . V E R I F Y A L L C O D E S I N E F F E C T A T T H E T I M E O F T H E N O T I C E T O P R O C E E D A N D S T A Y C U R R E N T W I T H A L L C O D E C H A N G E S W H I C H A F F E C T T H E W O R K U N T I L S U B S T A N T I A L C O M P L E T I O N . 4 . I T I S T H E S O L E R E S P O N S I B L I T Y O F T H E C O N T R A C T O R T O O B T A T I N A N D P A Y F O R A L L C O N S T R U C T I O N R E L A T E D P E R M I T S . C O D E S I N E F F E C T 1 . T H E F O L L O W I N G C O D E S A R E A P P L I C A B L E A N D I N E F F E C T : · 2 0 0 7 M I N N E S O T A S T A T E B U I L D I N G C O D E · 2 0 0 6 I B C - I N T E R N A T I O N A L B U I L D I N G C O D E · A C I 3 1 8 - 0 2 ( C O N C R E T E D E S I G N ) · A I S C L R F D ( 3 R D E D I T I O N O R A S D 8 T H E D I T I O N ) 2 . A N Y R E V I S I O N S T O T H E A P P R O V E D A N D P E R M I T T E D D R A W I N G S O R D O C U M E N T S S H A L L B E S U B M I T T E D T O T H E C I T Y B U I L D I N G D E P A R T M E N T F O R R E V I E W . N O T I F Y T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O F T H E P R O C E S S I N G T I M E F O R E A C H R E V I S I O N S U B M I T T E D F O R P L A N C H E C K . C O P Y R I G H T A N D R E P R O D U C T I O N 1 . T H E U S E O F R E P R O D U C T I O N S O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S O R E L E C T R O N I C F I E L S A S S H O P D R A W I N G D O C U M E N T S B Y T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S A T T H E I R O W N R I S K . T H E D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T S A S S U M E N O L I A B I L I T Y A S A R E S U L T O F T H E U S E O F R E P R O D U C T I O N S O F T H E C O T N R A C T D O C U M E N T S F O R S H O P D R A W I N G S A N D / O R D E L E G A T E D D E S I G N D R A W I N G S . 2 . T H E E N T I R E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T P A C K A G E H E R E I N I S T H E O R I G I N A L A N D U N P U B L I S H E D P R O P E R T Y O F T H E O W N E R A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , U S E D O R D I S C L O S E D W I T H O U T T H E P R I O R E X P L I C I T W R I T T E N C O N S E N T . 3 . T H E U S E O F D I G I T A L D E S I G N F I L E S S H A L L R E Q U I R E T H E C O N T R A C T O R T O A G R E E T O P R I M E C O N S U L T A N T ' S L I C E N S E C O N D I T I O N S B E F O R E U S E . C O N S T R U C T I O N L O A D S , D A M A G E S & R E P A I R S 1 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S S O L E L Y R E S P O N S I B L E F O R S L O P E S T A B I L I T Y A N D D E W A T E R I N G D U R I N G T H E W O R K S U N L E S S U N K N O W N C O N D I T I O N S A R E E N C O U N T E R E D . 2 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S S O L E L Y R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O T E C T I N G T H E W O R K S F R O M C O N S T R U C T I O N L O A D S A N D D A M A G E S T O E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E S T O R E M A I N , N E W S T R U C T U R E S A N D N E W P A V E M E N T S D U R I N G T H E W O R K S . 3 . B E F U L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E C O S T O F A N Y A N D A L L D A M A G E S W H I C H O C C U R A S A R E S U L T O F A F A I L U R E T O M I T I G A T E C O N S T R U C T I O N L O A D S A N D / O R P R O T E C T T H E W O R K S F R O M A N Y C O N S T R U C T I O N R E L A T E D I M P A C T S . R E P A I R S S H A L L B E T O A N E W O R B E T T E R C O N D I T I O N C O M P A R E D T O T H E E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N B E F O R E D A M A G E , A N D A S A P P R O V E D B Y T H E O W N E R ' S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E . 4 . C O N F I R M O N - S T R U C T U R E U N I F O R M A N D P O I N T L O A D L I M I T S W I T H E N G I N E E R P R I O R T O I M P O R T I N G A N D H A N D L I N G L A N D S C A P E M A T E R I A L S O V E R V A U L T S , A N D / O R T U N N E L S , I N C L U D I N G U T I L I T Y S T R U C T U R E S , A N D F L O O D C O N T R O L S T R U C T U R E S . C O N T R U C T I O N W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T 1 . R E M O V E F R O M T H E S I T E A N Y E X C E S S M A T E R I A L A N D / O R D E B R I S . D I S P O S A L O F M A T E R I A L S I S T H E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y O F T H E C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E X C E S S M A T E R I A L A N D / O R D E B R I S T O A B L E T O B E R E C Y C L E D O R R E U S E D S H A L L B E D I S P O S E D O F O F F T H E P R O J E C T S I T E I N A P E R M I T T E D L A N D F I L L . C H A R L E S O . E V E N S 5 0 5 7 5 M A Y 2 7 , 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 / 0 1 / 0 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 1 L 4 1 5 Q r G d C c Q m U a J n A f P r P s P s P s J n Q m E x i s t i n g C o t t o n w o o d T o R e m a i n I n s t a l l G r a s s S e e d & E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t , A l l D i s t u r b e d A r e a s , T y p . ( 2 ) A g S a v e E x i s t i n g S p r u c e I f P o s s i b l e E x i s t i n g A s h T o R e m a i n E x i s t i n g A p p l e T r e e T o R e m a i n E x i s t i n g B o x e l d e r T r e e T o R e m a i n A n t i c i p a t e d G r a d i n g L i m i t s , T y p . I n s t a l l G r a s s S e e d & E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t , A l l D i s t u r b e d A r e a s , T y p . 2 L 4 1 5 J n ( 1 ) A g P r o j e c t N o . R e v i s i o n s 1 2 2 0 M a r s h a l l S t r e e t N E M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 3 - 1 0 3 6 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 1 0 0 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 4 9 9 f a x w w w . r s p a r c h . c o m R S P A r c h i t e c t s C e r t i f i c a t i o n P r o j e c t F o r I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . D a t e R e g i s t r a t i o n N u m b e r S i g n a t u r e D r a w n B y C h e c k e d B y D a t e N O T I C E : T h e d e s i g n s s h o w n a n d d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n i n c l u d i n g a l l t e c h n i c a l d r a w i n g s , g r a p h i c s , a n d m o d e l s t h e r e o f , a r e p r o p r i e t a r y a n d c a n n o t b e c o p i e d , d u p l i c a t e d o r c o m m e r c i a l l y e x p l o i t e d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , w i t h o u t e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f R S P A r c h i t e c t s . T h e s e a r e a v a i l a b l e f o r l i m i t e d r e v i e w a n d e v a l u a t i o n b y c l i e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , c o n t r a c t o r s , g o v e r n m e n t a g e n c i e s , v e n d o r s a n d o f f i c e p e r s o n n e l o n l y i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h i s N o t i c e . © C o p y r i g h t R S P A r c h i t e c t s 2 0 1 5 . A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . C o n s u l t a n t s L 2 0 0 L a n d s c a p e P l a n B L D G 3 - B L D G 1 0 L I N K 6 1 3 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 C E C h e c k e r 2 7 M A Y 2 0 1 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 4 0 1 2 n d A v e n u e N o r t h , S u i t e 4 1 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 P 6 1 2 . 3 3 2 . 7 5 2 2 0 1 5 ' 3 0 ' 6 0 ' S C A L E : 1 " = 3 0 ' - 0 " N O R T H C H A R L E S O . E V E N S 5 0 5 7 5 M A Y 2 7 , 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 / 0 1 / 0 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L D l 1 2 8 0 s f J h 9 9 1 s f D l 1 1 5 8 s f R a 7 8 0 s f R a 1 7 1 0 s f A m 6 7 8 s f A m 1 6 5 8 s f R a 2 9 0 s f ( 3 ) A g J h 8 6 8 s f 1 1 1 2 2 S c 3 9 4 s f S h 2 8 0 s f E D G - 1 C R B - 1 C R B - 1 C R B - 1 C R B - 1 E D G - 1 EDG-1 EDG-1 EDG-2 R a 5 5 2 s f E D G - 2 C v 2 7 5 s f C v 3 0 5 s f J e 3 4 5 s f J e 3 4 5 s f P v 2 7 7 s f P v 2 5 3 s f C p 2 3 3 s f C p 1 7 9 s f E D G - 2 I n s t a l l G r a s s S e e d & E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t , A l l D i s t u r b e d A r e a s , T y p . I n s t a l l G r a s s S e e d & E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t , A l l D i s t u r b e d A r e a s , T y p . S c 3 2 1 s f P v 8 3 8 s f R a 6 6 4 s f J h 2 9 5 s f J h 1 1 1 5 s f I n s t a l l G r a s s S e e d & E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t , A l l D i s t u r b e d A r e a s , T y p . J w J h 6 0 0 s f P r o j e c t N o . R e v i s i o n s 1 2 2 0 M a r s h a l l S t r e e t N E M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 3 - 1 0 3 6 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 1 0 0 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 4 9 9 f a x w w w . r s p a r c h . c o m R S P A r c h i t e c t s C e r t i f i c a t i o n P r o j e c t F o r I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . D a t e R e g i s t r a t i o n N u m b e r S i g n a t u r e D r a w n B y C h e c k e d B y D a t e N O T I C E : T h e d e s i g n s s h o w n a n d d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n i n c l u d i n g a l l t e c h n i c a l d r a w i n g s , g r a p h i c s , a n d m o d e l s t h e r e o f , a r e p r o p r i e t a r y a n d c a n n o t b e c o p i e d , d u p l i c a t e d o r c o m m e r c i a l l y e x p l o i t e d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , w i t h o u t e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f R S P A r c h i t e c t s . T h e s e a r e a v a i l a b l e f o r l i m i t e d r e v i e w a n d e v a l u a t i o n b y c l i e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , c o n t r a c t o r s , g o v e r n m e n t a g e n c i e s , v e n d o r s a n d o f f i c e p e r s o n n e l o n l y i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h i s N o t i c e . © C o p y r i g h t R S P A r c h i t e c t s 2 0 1 5 . A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . C o n s u l t a n t s L 4 1 5 L a n d s c a p e E n l a r g e m e n t P l a n B L D G 3 - B L D G 1 0 L I N K 6 1 3 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 C E C h e c k e r 2 7 M A Y 2 0 1 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 4 0 1 2 n d A v e n u e N o r t h , S u i t e 4 1 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 P 6 1 2 . 3 3 2 . 7 5 2 2 1 L 4 1 5 E N L A R G E M E N T P L A N 1 : 1 0 2L415ENLARGEMENT PLAN1:10 C H A R L E S O . E V E N S 5 0 5 7 5 M A Y 2 7 , 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 / 0 1 / 0 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L R O O T F L A R E E V E N W I T H F I N I S H G R A D E + 1 " M A I N T A I N B U R L A P , W I R E B A S K E T & R O P E I N P L A C E 2 " M U L C H A R O U N D T R E E - H O L D M U L C H A W A Y F R O M T R E E F L A R E T E M P O R A R Y S O I L S A U C E R F O R W A T E R I N G - R E M O V E P R I O R T O S U R F A C E F I N I S H I N G C O M P A C T E D D R A I N A G E C O U R S E P E D E S T A L L A N D S C A P E S O I L S - S E E ' P L A N T I N G S O I L S ' I N S P E C A M E N D E D S U B G R A D E R O U G H E N S L O P E P R O T E C T B R A N C H E S F R O M D A M A G E S I N G L E D O M I N A N T L E A D E R P L A N T T R E E T R U N K P L U M B + / - 1 0 ' M I N . 7 0 0 F T ³ S O I L P E R T R E E I N C L . R O O T B A L L 3 L 5 0 0 T R E E P L A N T I N G D E T A I L S C A L E 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " S E E P L A N 1 2 " M I N . P R E P A R E S O I L F O R T H E E N T I R E B E D 4" E D G E C O N D I T I O N V A R I E S A P P L Y P R E - E M E R G E N T H E R B I C I D E I N S T A L L 2 " L A Y E R O F M U L C H , D O N O T P L A C E I N C O N T A C T W / S H R U B S T E M N O T E : R E F E R T O E X T E R I O R P L A N T I N G S P E C I F I C A T I O N E D G E R , R E F E R T O P L A N A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N L O O S E N R O O T S O F C O N T A I N E R G R O W N P L A N T S E X C A V A T E P L A N T B E D M I N . 4 " D E E P E R T H A N R O O T B A L L H G T . S C A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M O F P L A N T I N G B E D W I T H S P A D E U N D I S T U R B E D S U B G R A D E 6 " M I N . R E F E R T O P L A N 18" MIN. P R E P A R E S O I L F O R T H E E N T I R E B E D E D G E R , R E F E R T O P L A N A N D S P E C I F I C A I T O N E D G E C O N D I T I O N V A R I E S I N S T A L L 1 " L A Y E R O F S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D M U L C H O R 2 " L A Y E R O F F I N E L Y S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D M U L C H . D O N O T P L A C E I N C O N T A C T W I T H P L A N T P L A N T I N G S O I L N O T E : R E F E R T O E X T E R I O R P L A N T I N G S P E C I F I C A T I O N L O O S E N R O O T S O F C O N T A I N E R G R O W N P L A N T S S C A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M O F P L A N T I N G B E D W I T H S P A D E U N D I S T U R B E D S U B G R A D E 2 L 5 0 0 S H R U B P L A N T I N G D E T A I L S C A L E 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 L 5 0 0 P E R E N N I A L P L A N T I N G D E T A I L S C A L E 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " P r o j e c t N o . R e v i s i o n s 1 2 2 0 M a r s h a l l S t r e e t N E M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 1 3 - 1 0 3 6 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 1 0 0 6 1 2 . 6 7 7 . 7 4 9 9 f a x w w w . r s p a r c h . c o m R S P A r c h i t e c t s C e r t i f i c a t i o n P r o j e c t F o r I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . D a t e R e g i s t r a t i o n N u m b e r S i g n a t u r e D r a w n B y C h e c k e d B y D a t e N O T I C E : T h e d e s i g n s s h o w n a n d d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n i n c l u d i n g a l l t e c h n i c a l d r a w i n g s , g r a p h i c s , a n d m o d e l s t h e r e o f , a r e p r o p r i e t a r y a n d c a n n o t b e c o p i e d , d u p l i c a t e d o r c o m m e r c i a l l y e x p l o i t e d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , w i t h o u t e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f R S P A r c h i t e c t s . T h e s e a r e a v a i l a b l e f o r l i m i t e d r e v i e w a n d e v a l u a t i o n b y c l i e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , c o n t r a c t o r s , g o v e r n m e n t a g e n c i e s , v e n d o r s a n d o f f i c e p e r s o n n e l o n l y i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h i s N o t i c e . © C o p y r i g h t R S P A r c h i t e c t s 2 0 1 5 . A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . C o n s u l t a n t s L 5 0 0 L a n d s c a p e D e t a i l s B L D G 3 - B L D G 1 0 L I N K 6 1 3 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 8 C E C h e c k e r 2 7 M A Y 2 0 1 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 4 0 1 2 n d A v e n u e N o r t h , S u i t e 4 1 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 1 P 6 1 2 . 3 3 2 . 7 5 2 2 C H A R L E S O . E V E N S 5 0 5 7 5 M A Y 2 7 , 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 / 0 1 / 0 6 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 3 . 1 3 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 3 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 7 3 . 7 4 . 0 4 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 3 3 . 4 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 7 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 3 3 . 1 3 . 4 4 . 3 5 . 5 4 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 3 3 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 8 4 . 0 3 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 2 1 . 9 2 . 4 3 . 2 3 . 3 4 . 6 5 . 5 4 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 8 3 . 6 4 . 0 5 . 1 5 . 8 5 . 8 4 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 2 1 . 8 2 . 2 3 . 0 3 . 6 4 . 2 5 . 5 5 . 8 5 . 9 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 3 3 . 1 3 . 4 4 . 4 5 . 6 4 . 8 5 . 3 5 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 4 2 . 7 2 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 1 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 6 3 . 6 4 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 7 4 . 5 4 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 4 4 . 5 5 . 7 4 . 8 5 . 4 5 . 8 3 . 9 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 4 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 9 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 5 3 . 6 3 . 8 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 2 2 . 9 3 . 8 4 . 2 5 . 4 6 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 1 4 . 1 3 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 3 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 5 1 . 9 2 . 5 3 . 5 4 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 5 4 . 5 4 . 4 4 . 4 3 . 4 2 . 7 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 4 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 8 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 3 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 8 3 . 7 4 . 1 4 . 0 4 . 3 4 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 2 . 8 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 1 1 . 8 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 3 2 . 9 3 . 5 4 . 0 4 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 6 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 6 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 9 3 . 9 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 7 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 5 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 0 1 . 4 1 . 9 2 . 4 2 . 9 3 . 3 3 . 9 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 4 1 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 5 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 3 2 . 8 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 3 2 . 7 3 . 4 4 . 3 4 . 5 4 . 2 4 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 9 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 7 3 . 7 4 . 4 4 . 7 5 . 5 5 . 7 5 . 0 4 . 2 3 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 7 3 . 7 4 . 2 4 . 1 4 . 5 4 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 9 5 . 4 5 . 7 5 . 5 6 . 0 4 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 1 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 5 2 . 9 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 6 3 . 2 3 . 9 4 . 3 5 . 4 6 . 0 5 . 9 4 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 3 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 0 1 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 9 3 . 6 3 . 8 5 . 6 4 . 9 4 . 7 6 . 1 4 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 2 2 . 7 3 . 5 3 . 6 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 7 3 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 5 4 . 7 5 . 6 4 . 7 5 . 3 5 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 1 1 . 4 0 . 9 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 9 1 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 8 5 . 1 5 . 7 5 . 8 5 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 5 3 . 1 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 9 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 6 3 . 5 4 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 5 4 . 5 4 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 6 4 . 6 5 . 6 4 . 8 5 . 5 5 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 0 1 . 4 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 8 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 2 3 . 1 4 . 0 4 . 1 4 . 7 4 . 9 4 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 7 4 . 0 5 . 3 5 . 8 5 . 9 5 . 2 3 . 8 3 . 6 2 . 9 2 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 6 3 . 1 3 . 9 4 . 2 5 . 1 5 . 8 5 . 5 4 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 3 3 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 6 3 . 2 3 . 4 4 . 2 5 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 8 5 . 9 3 . 9 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 6 3 . 4 4 . 1 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 6 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 1 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 3 A A A A A S t a t i s t i c s D e s c r i p t i o n S y m b o l A v g M a x M i n M a x / M i n A v g / M i n C a l c Z o n e # 1 2 . 1 f c 6 . 1 f c 0 . 1 f c 6 1 . 0 : 1 2 1 . 0 : 1 S c h e d u l e S y m b o l L a b e l Q T Y M a n u f a c t u r e r C a t a l o g N u m b e r D e s c r i p t i o n L a m p N u m b e r L a m p s F i l e n a m e L u m e n s p e r L a m p L L F W a t t a g e A 5 C r e e I n c . F o r u s e w i t h S e r i e s E E d g e , E d g e H i g h O u t p u t , 2 2 8 , 3 0 4 a n d L E D w a y l u m i n a i r e s . E d i t e d f r o m 6 0 L E D T Y P E V M E D I U M O P T I C S 7 0 0 m A 4 0 0 0 K L E D W A Y S T R E E T L I G H T S S I X T Y W H I T E L I G H T E M I T T I N G D I O D E S V E R T I C A L B A S E - U P P O S I T I O N 1 5 M - E . I E S 1 1 6 3 3 0 . 8 1 3 3 W L S o r a p p r o v e d e q u a l I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y R E G I S T E R E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . D A N I E L P A U L B I G G A R D A T E : T H E S E D O C U M E N T S H A V E B E E N P R E P A R E D B Y H U N T E L E C T R I C C O R P O R A T I O N W I T H T H E E X P R E S S E D U N D E R S T A N D I N G T H A T T H E I N S T A L L A T I O N O F T H E W O R K D E S C R I B E D W I L L B E P E R F O R M E D B Y H U N T E L E C T R I C C O R P O R A T I O N O R U N D E R D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N . I N S T A L L A T I O N O F T H I S W O R K U N D E R A N Y O T H E R C I R C U M S T A N C E S I S P R O H I B I T E D . P R O J E C T N U M B E R : D A T E : D R A W N : C H E C K E D : S C A L E : S H E E T N U M B E R R E G . N O . PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH R E V I S I O N S C H E D U L E S H E E T N A M E N O R T H A R R O W K E Y P L A N S I G N A T U R E R E G . N O . 2 6 7 5 2 2 / 2 0 / 1 7 9 9 9 1 0 / N M 0 5 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 6 D . P . B . D . P . B . N O . R E V I S I O N D A T E A S I N D I C A T E D B L D G 3 - B L D G 1 0 L I N K R E V I S I O N D A T E # 7 9 0 0 C h i c a g o A v e n u e S o u t h B l o o m i n g t o n , M N 5 5 4 2 0 ( 6 5 1 ) 6 4 6 2 9 1 1 F a x ( 6 5 1 ) 6 4 3 6 5 7 5 E 0 0 2 S I T E P L A N - P H O T O M E T R I C S:\Jobs\99910\NormM\BSC Campus Skyway\Engineering\Drawings\E002.dwg, 2/20/2017 12:08:56 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Rev. Date: V4 09/20/2016 Cree Edge™ Series LED Area Luminaire – Round Ordering Information Example: ARE-EDR-2M-R3-12-E-UL-SV-350 ARE-EDR E Product Optic Mounting* LED Count (x10) Series Voltage Color Options Drive Current Options ARE-EDR 2M Type II Medium 2MB Type II Medium w/BLS 2MP Type II Medium w/Partial BLS 3M Type III Medium 3MB Type III Medium w/BLS 3MP Type III Medium w/Partial BLS 4M Type IV Medium 4MB Type IV Medium w/BLS 4MP Type IV Medium w/Partial BLS 5M Type V Medium 5S Type V Short R3 Spider, Center Tenon, 2-3/8" to 3" OD R4 Spider, Center Direct, 4" Square R5 Spider, Center Direct, 5" Round 04** 06** 08** 10 12 E UL Universal 120-277V UH Universal 347-480V BK Black BZ Bronze SV Silver WH White 350 350mA 525 525mA 700 700mA - Available with 40-60 LEDs DIM 0-10V Dimming -Control by others -Refer to Dimming spec sheet for details -Can't exceed specified drive current F Fuse -When code dictates fusing, use time delay fuse -Available with UL voltage only -Available for U.S. applications only HL Hi/Low (Dual Circuit Input) -Refer to HL spec sheet for details -Sensor not included P Photocell -Available with UL voltage only 40K 4000K Color Temperature -Minimum 70 CRI -Color temperature per luminaire * Reference EPA and pole configuration suitability data beginning on page 14 ** Consists of multiple 20 LED light bars. 40, 60, and 80 LED units use blanks as needed in place of populated light bars NOTE: Price adder may apply depending on configuration Product Description The Cree Edge™ Series has a slim, low profile design. Its rugged cast aluminum housing minimizes wind load requirements and features an integral, weathertight LED driver compartment, spun vented cover, high performance aluminum heat sinks and leaf/debris guard. Applications: Auto Dealerships, parking lots, campuses, facade lighting and general site lighting applications Accessories Field-Installed Bird Spikes XA-BRDSPK Backlight Control Shields XA-20BLS-4 - Four-pack - Unpainted stainless steel Patented NanoOptic® Product Technology Made in the U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts CRI: Minimum 70 CRI CCT: 4000K (+/- 300K), 5700K (+/- 500K) standard Limited Warranty†: 10 years on luminaire/10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish Performance Summary † See http://lighting.cree.com/warranty for warranty terms LED Count (x10)Weight 04 33.8 lbs. (15.3kg) 06 35.2 lbs. (15.9kg) 08 37.0 lbs. (16.8kg) 10 40.7 lbs. (18.5kg) 12 42.4 lbs. (19.3kg) R3 Mount 3.4"(86mm) 4.6"(116mm) 3.9"(98mm) Ø23.0"(584mm) 21.4"(544mm) 4.0"(102mm) 17.4"(442mm) R4/R5 Mount - see page 14 for weight & dimensions T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Product Specifications CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Slim, low profile, minimizing wind load requirements • Luminaire sides are rugged die cast aluminum with integral, weathertight LED driver compartment, spun vented cover, and high performance aluminum heat sinks • R3 spider mount hub slip-fits over a 2.375" (60mm) to 3" (76mm) O.D. steel or aluminum tenon or pole and secures with eight set screws • R4 spider mount fits directly inside 4" (102mm) square pole and secures to pole with four set screws • R5 spider mount fits directly inside of a 5" (127mm) round pole to provide a clean hardware-less outer appearance • Includes leaf/debris guard • Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish features an E-Coat epoxy primer with an ultra-durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Black, bronze, silver, and white are available • Weight: See Dimensions and Weight charts on pages 1 and 14 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Input Voltage : 120-277V or 347-480V, 50/60Hz, Class 1 drivers • Power Factor : > 0.9 at full load • Total Harmonic Distortion : < 20% at full load • 10V Source Current: 40-80 LEDs: 0.15mA; 100-120 LEDs: 0.30mA • Integral 10kV surge suppression protection standard • When code dictates fusing, a slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used to address inrush current REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations • Meets FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class A standards for conducted and radiated emissions • Enclosure rated IP66 per IEC 60529 when ordered without P option • Certified to ANSI C136.31-2001, 1.5G normal vibration standards when ordered with R3, R4 and R5 mounts • 10kV surge suppression protection tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • DLC qualified. Exceptions apply when ordered with full backlight control or 3MP optic. Please refer to www.designlights.org/QPL for most current information • Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Electrical Data* LED Count (x10) System Watts 120-480V Total Current (A) 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V 350mA 04 46 0.36 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.15 0.12 06 66 0.52 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.20 0.15 08 90 0.75 0.44 0.38 0.34 0.26 0.20 10 110 0.92 0.53 0.47 0.41 0.32 0.24 12 130 1.10 0.63 0.55 0.48 0.38 0.28 525mA 04 70 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.21 0.16 06 101 0.84 0.49 0.43 0.38 0.30 0.22 08 133 1.13 0.66 0.58 0.51 0.39 0.28 10 171 1.43 0.83 0.74 0.66 0.50 0.38 12 202 1.69 0.98 0.86 0.77 0.59 0.44 700mA 04 93 0.78 0.46 0.40 0.36 0.27 0.20 06 134 1.14 0.65 0.57 0.50 0.39 0.29 * Electrical data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage may differ by +/- 10% when operating between 120-480V +/- 10% Recommended Cree Edge™ Series Lumen Maintenance Factors (LMF)1 Ambient Initial LMF 25K hr Projected2 LMF 50K hr Projected2 LMF 75K hr Calculated3 LMF 100K hr Calculated3 LMF 5˚C (41˚F)1.04 1.01 0.99 0.98 0.96 10˚C (50˚F)1.03 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.95 15˚C (59˚F)1.02 0.99 0.97 0.96 0.94 20˚C (68˚F)1.01 0.98 0.96 0.95 0.93 25˚C (77˚F)1.00 0.97 0.95 0.94 0.92 1 Lumen maintenance values at 25˚C are calculated per TM-21 based on LM-80 data and in-situ luminaire testing 2 In accordance with IESNA TM-21-11, Projected Values represent interpolated value based on time durations that are within six times (6X) the IESNA LM-80-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing ((DUT) i.e. the packaged LED chip) 3 In accordance with IESNA TM-21-11, Calculated Values represent time durations that exceed six times (6X) the IESNA LM-80-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing ((DUT) i.e. the packaged LED chip) T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 2M Type II Medium Distribution LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 5,003 B1 U0 G1 5,102 B1 U0 G1 06 7,418 B2 U0 G2 7,565 B2 U0 G2 08 9,891 B2 U0 G2 10,087 B2 U0 G2 10 12,334 B2 U0 G2 12,578 B2 U0 G2 12 14,801 B3 U0 G3 15,094 B3 U0 G3 525mA 04 7,099 B2 U0 G2 7,248 B2 U0 G2 06 10,527 B2 U0 G2 10,748 B2 U0 G2 08 14,037 B3 U0 G3 14,331 B3 U0 G3 10 17,504 B3 U0 G3 17,870 B3 U0 G3 12 21,004 B3 U0 G3 21,444 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 8,379 B2 U0 G2 8,549 B2 U0 G2 06 12,425 B2 U0 G2 12,678 B2 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6371 ARE-EDG-2M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,985 ARE-EDR-2M-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,504 Initial FC at grade 1781 5344 7125 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 3562 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ 80' 60' 40' 0' 20' 12.2 6.1 0m 6.1 40'60'20'0'20'40'60' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.3 80' 24.4 24.4 18.3 20'CURB LINE 60'18.3 30.5 30.5 36.636.6 100'100'120'120' 24.4 12.240' 80' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 21 .1.2.5 70˚ T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 2MB Type II Medium Distribution w/BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 3,768 B1 U0 G1 3,843 B1 U0 G1 06 5,588 B1 U0 G1 5,698 B1 U0 G1 08 7,450 B1 U0 G2 7,598 B1 U0 G2 10 9,291 B1 U0 G2 9,475 B1 U0 G2 12 11,149 B1 U0 G2 11,370 B1 U0 G2 525mA 04 5,348 B1 U0 G1 5,460 B1 U0 G1 06 7,930 B1 U0 G2 8,096 B1 U0 G2 08 10,573 B1 U0 G2 10,794 B1 U0 G2 10 13,185 B1 U0 G2 13,461 B1 U0 G2 12 15,821 B2 U0 G2 16,153 B2 U0 G3 700mA 04 6,311 B1 U0 G1 6,440 B1 U0 G1 06 9,359 B1 U0 G2 9,549 B1 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6447 ARE-EDG-2MB-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 7,953 ARE-EDR-2MB-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,185 Initial FC at grade 1712 5136 6848 3424 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚ 150˚150˚ 70˚ 20'20' 20' 20' 40' 40' 40' 40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 0m 6.16.1 12.212.2 18.318.3 24.424.4 0' 0' 12.2 18.360'60'80'100'100'120'120'80' .1 21 Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. CURB LINE 30.530.536.636.6 60' .2 .5 T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 2MP Type II Medium Distribution w/Partial BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 4,418 B1 U0 G1 4,505 B1 U0 G1 06 6,551 B2 U0 G1 6,681 B2 U0 G1 08 8,735 B2 U0 G2 8,908 B2 U0 G2 10 10,892 B2 U0 G2 11,108 B2 U0 G2 12 13,071 B2 U0 G2 13,330 B2 U0 G2 525mA 04 6,270 B1 U0 G1 6,401 B2 U0 G1 06 9,297 B2 U0 G2 9,492 B2 U0 G2 08 12,396 B2 U0 G2 12,656 B2 U0 G2 10 15,458 B2 U0 G3 15,782 B2 U0 G3 12 18,549 B3 U0 G3 18,938 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 7,400 B2 U0 G2 7,550 B2 U0 G2 06 10,973 B2 U0 G2 11,196 B2 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6361 ARE-EDG-2MP-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 9,912 ARE-EDR-2MP-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 15,458 Initial FC at grade 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30º 150˚150˚ 3547 1773 5320 7094 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 70˚ 20'20' 20' 20' 40' 40' 40' 60' 40' 0m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 0' 0' 60'60'80'80'100'100'120'140'140'120'80' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 30.5 36.6 42.7 60' 6.112.218.324.430.536.642.7 0m 6.1 12.2 18.3 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 21.1 .2 .5 CURB LINE Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf Type III Medium Distribution LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 4,743 B1 U0 G1 4,837 B1 U0 G1 06 7,033 B2 U0 G2 7,172 B2 U0 G2 08 9,377 B2 U0 G2 9,563 B2 U0 G2 10 11,693 B3 U0 G3 11,925 B3 U0 G3 12 14,032 B3 U0 G3 14,310 B3 U0 G3 525mA 04 6,731 B2 U0 G2 6,872 B2 U0 G2 06 9,981 B3 U0 G3 10,190 B3 U0 G3 08 13,307 B3 U0 G3 13,586 B3 U0 G3 10 16,594 B3 U0 G3 16,942 B3 U0 G3 12 19,913 B3 U0 G3 20,330 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 7,944 B2 U0 G2 8,105 B2 U0 G2 06 11,779 B3 U0 G3 12,019 B3 U0 G3 3M ARE-EDR-3M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,779 Initial FC at grade 80' 20' 20' 40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 40'60'20'0'20'40'60' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.112.2 18.3 80' 24.424.4 24.4 0' CURB LINE40'12.2 30.530.5 100'100' 18.3 18.360' 80' 24.4 60' 1 .5 .2 Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 80' .1 55˚ 2 RESTL Test Report #: PL09276-001A ARE-EDG-3M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,333 1431 4294 5725 120˚120˚ 150˚150˚ 2863 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 3MB Type III Medium Distribution w/BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 3,508 B1 U0 G1 3,578 B1 U0 G1 06 5,202 B1 U0 G2 5,305 B1 U0 G2 08 6,936 B1 U0 G2 7,074 B1 U0 G2 10 8,650 B1 U0 G2 8,821 B1 U0 G2 12 10,380 B1 U0 G3 10,585 B1 U0 G3 525mA 04 4,979 B1 U0 G2 5,083 B1 U0 G2 06 7,383 B1 U0 G2 7,538 B1 U0 G2 08 9,844 B1 U0 G2 10,050 B1 U0 G3 10 12,275 B1 U0 G3 12,532 B1 U0 G3 12 14,730 B2 U0 G3 15,039 B2 U0 G3 700mA 04 5,876 B1 U0 G2 5,996 B1 U0 G2 06 8,714 B1 U0 G2 8,891 B1 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6648 ARE-EDG-3MB-**-06-E-UL-700 Initial Delivered Lumens: 7,740 ARE-EDR-3MB-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 12,275 Initial FC at grade 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚ 150˚150˚ 1225 3675 4900 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 2450 20'20' 20' 40' 40' 20' 40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 0m 6.16.1 12.212.2 18.318.3 24.424.4 0' 0' 12.2 18.3 24.4 60'60'80'100'100'80' .5.2.1 21 Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 30.530.5 60' 80' 40' 60˚ CURB LINE T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 3MP Type III Medium Distribution w/Partial BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 4,158 B1 U0 G1 4,240 B1 U0 G1 06 6,166 B1 U0 G2 6,288 B1 U0 G2 08 8,221 B2 U0 G2 8,384 B2 U0 G2 10 10,252 B2 U0 G2 10,455 B2 U0 G3 12 12,302 B2 U0 G3 12,546 B2 U0 G3 525mA 04 5,901 B1 U0 G2 6,024 B1 U0 G2 06 8,750 B2 U0 G2 8,933 B2 U0 G2 08 11,667 B2 U0 G3 11,911 B2 U0 G3 10 14,548 B3 U0 G3 14,853 B3 U0 G3 12 17,458 B3 U0 G3 17,824 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 6,964 B2 U0 G2 7,106 B2 U0 G2 06 10,327 B2 U0 G2 10,537 B2 U0 G3 CSA Test Report #: 6385 ARE-EDG-3MP-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 9,619 ARE-EDR-3MP-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 14,548 Initial FC at grade 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30º 150˚150˚ 2534 1267 3801 5068 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 1 CURB LINE Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 0' 0' 20' 20' 20' 6.1 0m 6.112.2 18.312.218.3 20' 40'40' 40' 40' 60'60'80'100'120'100'100'120'80' 60' 60' 80' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.424.430.5 30.5 36.636.6 30.5 24.4 12.2 18.3 2.5.2.1 60˚ T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 4M Type IV Medium Distribution LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 5,003 B2 U0 G1 5,102 B2 U0 G1 06 7,418 B2 U0 G2 7,565 B2 U0 G2 08 9,891 B2 U0 G2 10,087 B2 U0 G2 10 12,334 B3 U0 G3 12,578 B3 U0 G3 12 14,801 B3 U0 G3 15,094 B3 U0 G3 525mA 04 7,099 B2 U0 G2 7,248 B2 U0 G2 06 10,527 B2 U0 G2 10,748 B2 U0 G2 08 14,037 B3 U0 G3 14,331 B3 U0 G3 10 17,504 B3 U0 G3 17,870 B3 U0 G3 12 21,004 B3 U0 G3 21,444 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 8,379 B2 U0 G2 8,549 B2 U0 G2 06 12,425 B3 U0 G3 12,678 B3 U0 G3 ARE-EDR-4M-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,504 Initial FC at grade 20' 20' 20'20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.10m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 30.5100' 80' 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80' 60' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 2 CURB LINE .2 1.5.1 40˚ CSA Test Report #: 6438 ARE-EDG-4M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,367 1627 4880 6507 3254 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf 4MB Type IV Medium Distribution w/BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 3,768 B1 U0 G1 3,843 B1 U0 G1 06 5,588 B1 U0 G1 5,698 B1 U0 G2 08 7,450 B1 U0 G2 7,598 B1 U0 G2 10 9,291 B1 U0 G2 9,475 B1 U0 G2 12 11,149 B1 U0 G2 11,370 B1 U0 G2 525mA 04 5,348 B1 U0 G1 5,460 B1 U0 G1 06 7,930 B1 U0 G2 8,096 B1 U0 G2 08 10,573 B1 U0 G2 10,794 B1 U0 G2 10 13,185 B1 U0 G2 13,461 B1 U0 G2 12 15,821 B2 U0 G3 16,153 B2 U0 G3 700mA 04 6,311 B1 U0 G2 6,440 B1 U0 G2 06 9,359 B1 U0 G2 9,549 B1 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6449 ARE-EDG-4MB-**-12-E-UL-525-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,155 ARE-EDR-4MB-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,185 Initial FC at grade 120˚120˚ 90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30º 150˚150˚ 5267 2633 7900 10534 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 90˚ 20'20' 20' 20' 40' 40' 40' 40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 0m 6.16.1 12.212.2 18.318.3 24.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 12.2 18.3 60' 60' 60'80' 80' 100' 80'100'100' .5.2.1 Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 30.5 30.530.5 12 40˚ CURB LINE T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt 4MP Type IV Medium Distribution w/Partial BLS LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 4,418 B1 U0 G1 4,505 B1 U0 G1 06 6,551 B2 U0 G1 6,681 B2 U0 G1 08 8,735 B2 U0 G2 8,908 B2 U0 G2 10 10,892 B2 U0 G2 11,108 B2 U0 G2 12 13,071 B2 U0 G2 13,330 B2 U0 G2 525mA 04 6,270 B2 U0 G1 6,401 B2 U0 G1 06 9,297 B2 U0 G2 9,492 B2 U0 G2 08 12,396 B2 U0 G2 12,656 B2 U0 G2 10 15,458 B3 U0 G2 15,782 B3 U0 G2 12 18,549 B3 U0 G2 18,938 B3 U0 G3 700mA 04 7,400 B2 U0 G2 7,550 B2 U0 G2 06 10,973 B2 U0 G2 11,196 B2 U0 G2 CSA Test Report #: 6417 ARE-EDG-4MP-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 9,989 ARE-EDR-4MP-**-10-E-UL-525-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 15,458 Initial FC at grade 1612 4836 6448 3224 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30º 150˚150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 20'20' 20' 20' 40' 40' 40' 40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 0m 6.16.1 12.212.2 18.318.3 24.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 12.2 18.3 60' 60' 18.360' 60'80' 80' 100' 100'100'80' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 30.5 30.530.5 1.1 .5.2 21 CURB LINE 40˚ T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Type V Medium Distribution LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 5,262 B3 U0 G1 5,367 B3 U0 G1 06 7,804 B3 U0 G2 7,958 B3 U0 G2 08 10,405 B4 U0 G2 10,611 B4 U0 G2 10 12,975 B4 U0 G2 13,232 B4 U0 G2 12 15,570 B4 U0 G3 15,878 B4 U0 G3 525mA 04 7,468 B3 U0 G2 7,625 B3 U0 G2 06 11,074 B4 U0 G2 11,306 B4 U0 G2 08 14,766 B4 U0 G2 15,075 B4 U0 G3 10 18,413 B4 U0 G3 18,799 B4 U0 G3 12 22,096 B5 U0 G3 22,558 B5 U0 G3 700mA 04 8,814 B3 U0 G2 8,993 B3 U0 G2 06 13,070 B4 U0 G2 13,336 B4 U0 G2 5M ARE-EDR-5M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,070 Initial FC at grade 20' 20' 20'20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 30.530.530.5 100'100' 80' 100' 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80'100' 60' 30.5 1 .5 .2.1 Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. CURB LINE 0˚ RESTLTest Report #: PL09285-001 ARE-EDG-5M-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,136 1096 2191 3287 4382 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚ 150˚150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM-79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/cree-edge-series-1 Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: www.ies.org/PDF/Erratas/TM-15-11BugRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt Type V Short Distribution LED Count (x10) 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 350mA 04 5,847 B3 U0 G1 5,963 B3 U0 G1 06 8,671 B3 U0 G1 8,842 B3 U0 G1 08 11,561 B3 U0 G2 11,790 B3 U0 G2 10 14,416 B4 U0 G2 14,702 B4 U0 G2 12 17,300 B4 U0 G2 17,642 B4 U0 G2 525mA 04 8,298 B3 U0 G1 8,472 B3 U0 G1 06 12,305 B3 U0 G2 12,563 B3 U0 G2 08 16,406 B4 U0 G2 16,750 B4 U0 G2 10 20,459 B4 U0 G2 20,887 B4 U0 G2 12 24,551 B4 U0 G2 25,065 B4 U0 G2 700mA 04 9,793 B3 U0 G1 9,993 B3 U0 G2 06 14,523 B4 U0 G2 14,818 B4 U0 G2 5S ARE-EDR-5S-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 14,523 Initial FC at grade Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 25˚ 20' 20' 20'20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 30.5 30.530.5 100'100' 80' 100' 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80'100' 60' 30.5 .5 .1 CURB LINE .2 21 Restl Test Report #: PL09286-001A ARE-EDG-5S-**-06-E-UL-700-40K Initial Delivered Lumens: 14,123 1466 4397 5863 2931 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 90˚ © 2016 Cree, Inc. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.cree.com/patents. Cree®, NanoOptic®, and Colorfast DeltaGuard® are registered trademarks, and Cree Edge™ and the Cree logo are trademarks of Cree, Inc. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. NEMA® is a registered trademark of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. The DLC QPL logo is a registered trademark of Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships, Inc. T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415US: lighting.cree.com/lighting T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507Canada: www.cree.com/canada Cree Edge™ LED Area Luminaire – Round Post Top Mount – ARE-EDR-R3/R4/R5 LED Count (x10)Single R3 Single R4/R5 04 1.81 1.67 06 1.81 1.67 08 1.81 1.67 10 1.81 1.67 12 1.81 1.67 R5 Mount Ø23.0"(584mm) 3.4"(86mm) 21.5"(546mm) 4.5"(114mm) 17.4"(443mm) 3.9"(99mm) 4.0"(102mm) LED Count (x10)Weight 04 33.3 lbs. (15.1kg) 06 34.6 lbs. (15.7kg) 08 36.4 lbs. (16.5kg) 10 40.1 lbs. (18.2kg) 12 41.9 lbs. (19.0kg) LED Count (x10)Weight 04 36.2 lbs. (16.4kg) 06 37.6 lbs. (17.0kg) 08 39.3 lbs. (17.8kg) 10 43.0 lbs. (19.5kg) 12 44.8 lbs. (20.3kg) R4 Mount 4.0"(102mm) 3.4"(86mm) 4.3"(109mm) 17.4"(442mm) 21.4"(543mm) Ø23.0"(584mm) 3.5"(89mm) Luminaire EPA City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2017 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission Chair Thompson and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-002 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Boston Scientific Corporation Property Location: 4100 Hamline Avenue North Request: Site Plan Review Requested Action Boston Scientific has requested a Site Plan Review in order to construct a new parking and drop- off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on their corporate campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. Background/Overview of Request Boston Scientific has requested a Site Plan Review to construct a new parking and drop-off area to the east of the existing Building 10, between Innovation Way and the building. The new parking area will provide short-term parking and curbside drop-off for the daycare facility located in Building 10, and will help address existing safety concerns associated with parents dropping off children for daycare. The project will include the construction of 7 parking stalls and 3 curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. Additional landscaping and exterior lighting will also be installed for the new parking area and sidewalks. The applicant has submitted a project narrative describing the request (Attachment A) and a development plan set (Attachment C) indicating the existing and proposed conditions of the property. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 2 of 6 1. Surrounding Area Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential, Light Industrial and Office R-1: Single Family Residential, I-1: Limited Industrial Single Family Residential, Office South Light Industrial and Office, High Density Residential I-1: Limited Industrial, R-4: Multiple Dwelling Office, Utility, Multiple Family Residential East (Shoreview) RL-Residential / Office / RH- Residential PUD (Townhouses & Offices)/ R-3:Multiple Dwelling Residential Single Family Detached Residential / Office / Multiple Family West Low Density Residential Light Industrial and Office R-1: Single Family Residential I-1: Limited Industrial Single Family Residential Office 2. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Light Industrial and Office Zoning: I-1: Limited Industrial / PUD Overlay Size: Lot 1 = 77.41 acres Proposed Density: N/A Topography: Level Plan Review A Site Plan Review is required by the City’s Zoning Code for the reorganization of parking, drives, and entrances within any industrial district. 1. Section 1320 – District Provisions A. Lot Size and Dimensions (Section 1320.06) The lot is in conformance with the I-1 Zoning District requirements in terms of minimum lot area, depth, and width. The lot is 3,372,063 square feet (77.41 acres), with approximate dimensions of 1,950 feet by 1,730 feet. B. Lot Coverage and Landscaping (Section 1320.06) The maximum structure coverage allowed in the I-1 District is 30 percent and the minimum landscape coverage is 35 percent. The proposed project would not result in any additional structure coverage on the campus. Landscape area would be reduced by 8,865 square feet to City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 3 of 6 accommodate the new parking area and sidewalks. The proposed landscape coverage is 48.1 percent of the campus area, satisfying the I-1 District requirements. The Landscape Plan provided by the applicant includes landscaping improvements being completed in conjunction with the skyway project between Buildings 3 and 10 (Planning Case 16-004). One Black Walnut and three Serviceberry trees will be planted within the proposed parking lot area. The City has an existing Letter of Credit in place to ensure the landscaping improvements are installed according to the plan. 2. Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Off-Public Street Parking (Section 1325.06, Subd. 1) Dimensions The Zoning Code requires that parking stalls be at least 9 feet in width and 18 feet in length. The proposed parking stalls meet this requirement. Location Off-street parking areas containing four or more parking stalls must be a minimum of 20 feet from the right-of-way line of any public street, and five feet from any side or rear lot line. The parking area would be located approximately 900 feet from the closest right-of-way line, and 875 feet from the closest rear or side property line. 3. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. Lot Coverage Requirements Total Area Structure Coverage Landscape Coverage Existing Boston Scientific Campus 3,372,063 sq. ft. (77.41 Acres) 17.55% (591,960 sq. ft.) 48.37% (1,637,406 sq. ft.) Proposed Boston Scientific Campus 3,372,063 sq. ft. (77.41 Acres) 17.55% (591,960 sq. ft.) 48.10% (1,628,541 sq. ft.) Approved Boston Scientific Campus Master Plan 3,372,063 sq. ft. (77.41 Acres) 30.06% (1,007,527 sq. ft.) 55.23% (1,862,340 sq. ft.) I-1 Zoning District Requirements 30,000 30% or less 35% or more City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 4 of 6 City Engineer The Building Official reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. Lake Johanna Fire Department The Lake Johanna Fire Marshall reviewed the plans for the project and had no additional comments. Rice Creek Watershed District Boston Scientific has a permit in place from the Rice Creek Watershed District that includes the proposed parking and drop-off area. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings of fact for this proposal: 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Site Plan Review in order to construct a new parking and drop-off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. 2. A Site Plan Review is required by the City’s Zoning Code for the reorganization of parking, drives, and entrances within any industrial district. 3. The Boston Scientific campus is a conforming use in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District and operates under an approved PUD Overlay District. 4. The parking area would include seven parking stalls and three curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. 5. The proposal is conformance with the landscape lot area requirements for properties in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District as required by Section 1320.06 of the Zoning Code. 6. The proposal is in conformance with the off-public street parking requirements included in Section 1325.06, Subd. 1 of the Zoning Code. 7. The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood or the City as a whole. Staff Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review for a new parking and drop-off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request, staff recommends that the following three conditions be included with the approval: City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 5 of 6 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall continue to abide by all previous agreements, as amended by the conditions of approval of this application. 3. Exterior lighting shall conform to the design standards included in Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as amended by the three conditions in the February 8, 2017, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17- 002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the February 8, 2017, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, in order to gather the following information: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Public Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this planning case. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for February 8, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-002 - Boston Scientific - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_17-002 Page 6 of 6 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 9, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by March 10, 2017 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Site and Aerial Map C. Project Plan Set Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2017 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 17-002; Boston Scientific – Site Plan Review – 4100 Hamline Avenue North Senior Planner Bachler stated Boston Scientific has requested a Site Plan Review to construct a new parking and drop-off area to the east of the existing Building 10, between Innovation Way and the building. The new parking area will provide short-term parking and curbside drop-off for the daycare facility located in Building 10, and will help address existing safety concerns associated with parents dropping off children for daycare. Senior Planner Bachler reported the project will include the construction of 7 parking stalls and 3 curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. Additional landscaping and exterior lighting will also be installed for the new parking area and sidewalks. Site Data Land Use Plan: Light Industrial and Office Existing Land Use: Light Industrial and Office Zoning: I-1: Limited Industrial/PUD Overlay Current Lot Size: Lot 1 – 77.41 Acres Proposed Density: N/A Topography: Level Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the surrounding area and the Plan Evaluation. Senior Planner Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The applicant has requested approval of a Site Plan Review in order to construct a new parking and drop-off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. 2. A Site Plan Review is required by the City’s Zoning Code for the reorganization of parking, drives, and entrances within any industrial district. 3. The Boston Scientific campus is a conforming use in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District and operates under an approved PUD Overlay District. 4. The parking area would include seven parking stalls and three curbside drop-off spaces, along with two associated driveways and sidewalks. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 8, 2017 2 5. The proposal is conformance with the landscape lot area requirements for properties in the I-1 Limited Industrial Zoning District as required by Section 1320.06 of the Zoning Code. 6. The proposal is in conformance with the off-public street parking requirements included in Section 1325.06, Subd. 1 of the Zoning Code. 7. The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood or the City as a whole. Senior Planner Bachler stated based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review for a new parking and drop-off area for the daycare facility located in Building 10 on the Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request, staff recommends that the following three conditions be included with the approval: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. That the applicant shall continue to abide by all previous agreements, as amended by the conditions of approval of this application. 3. Exterior lighting shall conform to the design standards included in Section 1325.05, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code. Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Lambeth asked if the project would require any demolition. Senior Planner Bachler described the work that would be completed. He reported no structures would be demolished for the parking area. Chair Thompson questioned if the exterior lighting would be updated. Senior Planner Bachler stated new lighting would be added for the parking area. Staff will review the lighting for conformance with the Zoning Code when the applicant applies for permits. Chair Thompson stated that it will be important for the parking area to be well lit for safety reasons. She requested that additional information on the exterior lighting be provided for the City Council’s review of this case. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 8, 2017 3 Commissioner Hames moved and Commissioner Lambeth seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-002 for a Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as amended by the three (3) conditions in the February 8, 2017, Report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, and Abatement Contract for Land O’Lakes, Inc. Requested Action Motion to approve Resolution No. 2017-007 approving amendments to the MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, and Abatement Contract for the Land O’Lakes Project. Background On April 12, 2016, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2016-013, which authorized the City to enter into three public financial assistance agreements related to the expansion project for the Land O’Lakes corporate headquarters: • Grant Contract with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development • Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan with Land O’Lakes Inc. • Abatement Contract for Private Development between City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, and Land O’Lakes Inc. Land O’Lakes has received the necessary land use approvals from the City to complete the project, which will include the construction of a four-story, approximately 155,000 gross square foot office building to the immediate north of the existing buildings on the campus. Other site improvements include the expansion of the surface parking lots to provide approximately 1,678 parking stalls and the provision of extensive native landscaping. Construction on the expansion project is currently underway and is expected to be completed by December 31, 2018. CONSENT ITEM – 5E MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Amendment Request As part of the City’s approval of the public financial assistance, Land O’Lakes is required to create a minimum of 200 new jobs with wages of at least $18.00 per hour on the headquarters property within two years of the construction project being completed, but not later than December 31, 2020 (Compliance Date). When the financial assistance package was approved in April 2016, Land O’Lakes had determined the base number of jobs between its Arden Hills and Shoreview locations was 1,738. The company has since determined this number was miscalculated and the actual number of jobs at that time was 1,730, or eight fewer. Land O’Lakes has requested that the three public financial assistance agreements previously approved by the City be amended to reflect the revised number of base jobs. The company would still be required to create the 200 new jobs specified in the agreements. By the Compliance Date, Land O’Lakes would now need to document a minimum of 1,930 jobs at their headquarters property. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2017-007 approving amendments to the MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, and Abatement Contract for the Land O’Lakes Project. The City Attorney has reviewed the amended agreements and has no further comments at this time. Attachment A. Resolution No. 2017-007 approving amendments to MIF Grant Agreement, MIF Loan Agreement, and Abatement Contract for Land O’Lakes Project B. First Amendment to Abatement Contract for Private Development By and Among the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, and Land O’Lakes Inc. C. First Amendment to Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan By and Among the City of Arden Hills and Land O’Lakes Inc. D. First Amendment to Minnesota Investment Fund Grant Agreement 494696v1 JSB AR200-17 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #2017-007 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO MIF GRANT AGREEMENT, MIF LOAN AGREEMENT AND ABATEMENT CONTRACT FOR LAND O’ LAKES PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota (the “City”) has heretofore entered into a Grant Contract Number #CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16 (the “Grant Contract”) with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development and an Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan with Land O’Lakes, Inc. (the “Borrower”) dated April 12, 2016 (the “Loan Agreement”); WHEREAS, the City, the Borrower and Ramsey County, Minnesota (the “County”) have heretofore entered into an Abatement Contract for Private Redevelopment dated April 12, 2016 (the “Abatement Agreement); WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the City amend the Grant Contract pursuant to an Amendment No. 1 to CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16 (the “Grant Contract Amendment”), the Loan Agreement pursuant to a First Amendment to Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement Amendment”) and the Abatement Agreement pursuant to a First Amendment to Abatement Agreement (the “Abatement Agreement Amendment” and, together with the Loan Agreement Amendment and the Grant Contract Amendment, the “Amendments”), to among other things, clarify the number of pre-existing jobs at the Borrower’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Amendments as presented to the Council are hereby in all respects approved, in substantially the forms submitted, together with any related documents necessary in connection therewith (collectively, the “Amendment Documents”) and the Mayor and City Administrator (the “Authorized Officers”) are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment Documents on behalf of the City and to carry out, on behalf of the City, the City’s obligations thereunder. 2. The approval hereby given to the Amendment Documents includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by legal counsel to the City and by the Authorized Officers to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said Authorized Officers are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the Authorized Officers shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof. In the event of absence or disability of the officers, any of the documents authorized by this Resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or authorization of the Council by any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or officers of the Council as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf. Approved by the Council on March 13, 2017. _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 FIRST AMENDMENT TO ABATEMENT CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AND LAND O’LAKES, INC. March __, 2017 This instrument was drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (JSB) 200 South Sixth Street 470 U.S. Bank Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO ABATEMENT CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into this ____ day of March, 2017, between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the “County”) and LAND O’LAKES, INC., a Minnesota cooperative corporation (the “Developer”), and their permitted assigns. RECITALS WHEREAS, on April 12, 2016, the City, the County and the Developer heretofore entered into that certain Abatement Contract for Private Development (the “Original Agreement” and, together with this First Amendment to Abatement Agreement, the “Abatement Agreement”); WHEREAS, capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Original Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City, the County and the Developer desire to amend the Original Agreement to reflect the original base number of jobs located at the Developer’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations which had incorrectly included 8 jobs from other locations in Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. 3.8 (b) Job and Wage Goals. b) The Developer represents that as of April 11, 2016 it has 1,730 Full-Time Equivalent permanent, non-contract, non-seasonal employees in the Developer’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations. The Company will transfer the employees currently located at the Shoreview, Minnesota location to the Arden Hills, Minnesota location by the Compliance Date. On or before the Compliance Date, the Developer shall cause to be created at least 200 new Full-Time Equivalent jobs (the “New Jobs”) for a total of 1,930 Full-Time Equivalent jobs on the Development Property and shall cause the wages for all New Jobs on the Development Property to be no less than $18.00 per hour, exclusive of Benefits (the “Subsidy Jobs”). Any jobs created after April 11, 2016 will be considered New Jobs and count toward the Developer’s job creation goals. The City and the County each may, after a public hearing, extend the deadlines for the goals described in this clause (b) by up to one year, provided that nothing in this section will be construed to limit the City’s and the County’s respective legislative discretion regarding this matter. 4. Any capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Original Agreement. Any references to the “Agreement” or “this Agreement” in the Original Agreement shall refer to the Original Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, and as may be further amended and supplemented. 5. The amendments made to the Original Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, shall be effective as of the date hereof. 2 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 6. Except as hereby amended, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. S-1 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the County and the Developer have caused this First Amendment to Abatement Contract for Private Development to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Administrator S-2 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 LAND O’LAKES, INC. By Its ______________________ First Amendment to First Amendment to Abatement Contract for Private Development S-3 494639v2 JSB AR200-17 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA By: Its: Chair of the Board of Commissioners By: Its: Chief Clerk By____________________________________ Its: County Manager First Amendment to First Amendment to Abatement Contract for Private Development 494630v2 JSB AR200-17 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LOAN OF MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND – FORGIVABLE LOAN BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, AND LAND O’LAKES, INC. March __, 2017 This instrument was drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (JSB) 200 South Sixth Street 470 U.S. Bank Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 494630v2 JSB AR200-17 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LOAN OF MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND – FORGIVABLE LOAN (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into this ____ day of March, 2017, between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “Lender”), and LAND O’LAKES, INC., a Minnesota cooperative corporation (the “Borrower”), and their permitted assigns. RECITALS WHEREAS, on April 12, 2016, the Lender and the Borrower heretofore entered into that certain Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan (the “Original Agreement” and, together with this First Amendment to Loan Agreement, the “Loan Agreement”); WHEREAS, capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Original Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Lender and the Borrower desire to amend the Original Agreement to reflect the original base number of jobs located at the Borrower’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations which had incorrectly included 8 jobs from other locations in Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. 7.1 (b) Job and Wage Goals. b) The Borrower represents that as of April 11, 2016 it has 1,730 Full-Time Equivalent permanent, non-contract, non-seasonal employees in the Borrower’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations. The Borrower will transfer the employees currently located at the Shoreview, Minnesota location to the Arden Hills, Minnesota location by the Compliance Date. On or before the Compliance Date, the Borrower shall cause to be created at least 200 new Full-Time Equivalent jobs on the Development Property (the “New Jobs”) for a total of 1,930 Full-Time Equivalent jobs on the Development Property (the “Subsidy Jobs”). Any jobs on the Development Property created after April 11, 2016 will be considered New Jobs and count toward the Borrower’s Subsidy Job creation goals. The Borrower further represents that as of April 11, 2016 it has 535 full-time equivalent permanent, non-contract, non-seasonal employees in the State of Minnesota that are not on the Development Property (the “State Jobs”). As of the Compliance Date, the Borrower will provide evidence that at least the number of State Jobs set forth above exist in the State of Minnesota. If, prior to the Compliance Date, all or some of the State Jobs are transitioned to one or more third parties by sale or otherwise, and such third party agrees in writing at the time of such transition that such transitioned State Jobs will be retained in the State of Minnesota and such third party provides to the State evidence sufficient to the State in the State’s reasonable discretion that such State Jobs were retained in the State of Minnesota through the Compliance Date, the number of State Jobs set forth above and the Borrower’s obligations therewith shall be subject to an immediate and corresponding reduction. The 2 494630v2 JSB AR200-17 City and the State may, collectively, after a public hearing, extend the deadlines for the goals described in this clause (b) by up to one year, provided that nothing in this section will be construed to limit the City’s and the State’s legislative discretion regarding this matter. 4. All references in the Original Agreement to #CDAP-14-0007-H-FY15 are hereby corrected to #CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16. 5. Any capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Original Agreement. Any references to the “Agreement” or “this Agreement” in the Original Agreement shall refer to the Original Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, and as may be further amended and supplemented. 6. The amendments made to the Original Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, shall be effective as of the date hereof. 7. Except as hereby amended, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. S-1 494630v2 JSB AR200-17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lender and the Borrower have caused this First Amendment to Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Administrator S-1 494630v2 JSB AR200-17 LAND O’LAKES, INC. By Its ______________________ First Amendment to Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan Rev. 4/09 Amendment 1 to CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16 Contract Start Date: April 11, 2016 Total Contract Amount: $1,000,000.00 Original Contract Expiration Date: March 31, 2021 Original Contract: $1,000,000.00 Current Contract Expiration Date: Previous Amendment(s) Total: $0 Requested Contract Expiration Date: This Amendment: $0 This amendment is by and between the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of the Department of Employment & Economic Development (“State”) and the City of Arden Hills, 11245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 (“Grantee”). Recitals 1. The State has a contract with the Grantee identified as CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16 (”Original Contract”) which provided funds from the Minnesota Investment Fund for the purpose of conducting a project entitled Land O’ Lakes, Inc. 2. The Land O’ Lakes, Inc. and the Grantee have requested that the original number of base jobs, as contained in Exhibit A, Grantee Duties, Section 1.1 (a), be changed based on revised calculations by the Borrower. 3. The State and the Grantee are willing to amend the Original Contract as stated below. Contract Amendment In this Amendment deleted contract terms will be struck out and the added contract terms will be underlined In consideration of mutual promises set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1.1 Job Creation and Wages a) The Borrower represents that as of April 11, 2016 it has 1,738 1,730 Full-Time Equivalent permanent, non-contract, non-seasonal employees in the Borrower’s Arden Hills and Shoreview, Minnesota locations. The Borrower will transfer the employees currently located at the Shoreview, Minnesota location to the Arden Hills, Minnesota location by the Compliance Date. On or before the Compliance Date, the Borrower shall cause to be created at least 200 new full-time equivalent jobs on the Development Property (as defined in the Agreement for Loan of Minnesota Investment Fund – Forgivable Loan by and between the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota and Land O’ Lakes, Inc.) (the “New Jobs”) for a total of 1,938 1,930 Full-Time Equivalent jobs on the Development Property (the “Subsidy Jobs”). Any jobs on the Development Property created after April 11, 2016 will be considered New Jobs and count toward the Borrower’s Subsidy Job creation goals. The Borrower further represents that as of April 11, 2016 it has 508 535 full-time equivalent permanent, non-contract, non-seasonal employees in the State of Minnesota that are not on the Development Property (the “State Jobs”). As of the Compliance Date, the Borrower will provide evidence that at least the number of State Jobs set forth above exist in the State of Minnesota. If, prior to the Compliance Date, all or some of the State Jobs are transitioned to one or more third parties by sale or otherwise, and such third party agrees in writing at the time of such transition that such transitioned State Jobs will be retained in the State of Minnesota and such third party provides to the State evidence sufficient to the State in the State’s reasonable discretion that such State Jobs were retained in the State of Minnesota through the Compliance Date, the number of State Jobs set forth above and the Borrower’s obligations therewith shall be subject to an immediate and corresponding reduction. 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as Individual certifies the applicable provisions of Minn. Stat. required by Minn. Stat. §§16A.15 and 16C.05. §16C.08, subdivisions 2 and 3 are reaffirmed. Signed: ____________________________________________ By: ____________________________________________ (with delegated authority) Date: ____________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________ CFMS Contract No. A- _________ Object Code: ___________ Date: ____________________________________________ 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: ____________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________ By: ____________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________ Land O’ Lakes, Inc. – CDAP-16-0008-H-FY16, Amendment 1 01/30/2017 SC108675 O 3000249419 PR 25990 Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: City Properties Appraisal Services Proposals Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $0 $18,000.00 General Fund (Planning & Zoning) Requested Action Accept proposal from BRKW in the amount of $18,000.00 and authorize staff to enter into a contract with BRKW to complete appraisal services for 1450 West Highway 96 and 1245 West Highway 96. Discussion At the City Council Work Session on January 30, 2017, the City Council discussed the Option Agreement to purchase the Civic property on TCAAP and potential funding sources for development on the site. One of the funding sources discussed was the sale of the old City Hall property at 1450 West Highway 96 and the current City Hall property at 1245 West Highway 96. The City Council directed staff to have an appraisal completed so the City can better evaluate the potential sale of the two properties. Staff contacted three appraisal firms and requested a quote for the following scope of work: • Property 1 – 1450 West Highway 96 - Value of property developed for commercial uses - Value of property for residential uses (including single-family residential, townhomes, and multi-family) • Property 2 – 1245 West Highway 96 - Value of existing property as currently improved - Value of property developed for commercial uses - Value of property for residential uses (including single-family residential, townhomes, and multi-family) CONSENT ITEM – 5F MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Two firms provided quotes for the appraisal services: BRKW and Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm. Of the quotes received, BRKW was the lower amount at $18,000. The received quotes have been provided as an attachment. The request for quotes included a requirement that the appraisal reports be completed within 12 weeks of the authorization to proceed. BRKW has noted in their proposal they would be able to complete the work within this timeframe. Firm Cost BRKW $18,000.00 Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm $19,000.00 Kelly Lindstrom Did not submit proposal Fiscal Impact The appraisal for the two City-owned properties was not specifically included in the adopted 2017 budget. The General Fund includes $120,000 in Planning & Zoning for Professional Services. Of this total amount, $100,000 was budgeted for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update with the remaining $20,000 reserved for other professional services as needed. On February 13, 2017, the City Council approved a contract with WSB in the amount of $30,000 to complete a Higher Education Study in 2017. This study will be financed using the Planning & Zoning Professional Services funds in the General Fund. On March 13, 2017, the City Council will consider a proposal from WSB to complete the Comprehensive Plan for a total cost of $100,300. This item includes a recommendation from staff that the City Council consider financing portions of the Comprehensive Plan using the Sewer, Stormwater, and Water Funds, in addition to the General Fund. If the Comprehensive Plan proposal is approved, the total impact to the General Fund would be reduced to $52,300. The Comprehensive Plan and Higher Education Study together would have an impact of $82,300 to the General Fund, leaving a remaining balance of $37,700 for Planning & Zoning Professional Services. If the proposal from BRKW in the amount of $18,000 is approved, the remaining balance in this fund would be $19,700. Project Budgeted 2017 Actual Expense (General Fund) Higher Education Study $0 $30,000 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update $100,000 $52,300 Appraisal Reports for City- owned Properties $0 $18,000 Planning & Zoning Professional Services Fund $120,000 $100,300 Attachments A. Proposal from BRKW B. Proposal from Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm BRKW APPRAISALS, INC . 1600 UNIVERSITY AVEN UE, SUITE 314, ST. P AUL, MN 55104 651.646.6114 F AX 651.646.8086 www.brkw.com March 7 , 2017 Matthew Bachler, AICP Senior Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 R e : Proposal f or Appraisal Services Subject Propert ies : Property 1 : 1450 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN Property 2 : 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN Dear M r . Bachler : In response to your request and on behalf of BRKW Appraisals, Inc., I am submitting this proposal for our firm to provide the City of Arden Hills with real estate appraisals pertaining to the two a bove referenced city -owned properties. Property 1 comprises a vacant tract of land on the south side of Highway 96 , reflecting the former city public works facility, which has a land area of about 6.8 acres and is zoned as well as guided NB, Neighborhood Business. Property 2 is an approximately 6.9 -acre land parcel containing the current City Hall building on the western portion, and is zoned as well as guided P/I, Public & Institutional. Based on my preliminary research, the City Hall building was const ructed in 2001. It is my understanding that the City is in the process of evaluating the sale of the two properties for redevelopment. Purpose/Intended Use/Intended Users The purpose of the appraisal s is to provide an opinion of the market value of the fee simple interest in each of the two subject propert ies as of the date that they are viewed . The intended use of the appraisal s is for assisting the City of Arden Hills in evaluating and potentially completing the sale of the two cit y -owned properties for redevelopment . The intended users are officials of the City of Arden Hills . The client of this assignment would be the City of Arden Hills . Scope of Work Primary Valuation Methods : The three primary valuation methods used by real estate appraisers are the Cost Approach, the Sales Comparison Approach and the Income Approach. The Cost Approach involves first valuing the land and then adding to that the replacement cost new of the building and other improvements, less estimated accrued depreciation due to age and other factors. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 The Sales Comparison Approach can be used in appraising vacant land or improved properties (land wit h building). This approach involves comparing recent sales of land or improved properties which are reasonably similar to the property being appraised . Adjustments are made to the prices of the comparable sales for value - related differences relative to the subject property. The result is a reasonably narrow range of adjusted prices which indicate what the subject property likely would sell for if offered on the market. The range of value indications is reconciled into a final, single -point opinion of m arket value for the property within this valuation approach . The Income Approach involves determining market rent for the property, based on rent comparables from the market, and capitalizing an annual net income from that rent into a property value indic ation, based on parameters used by investors for similar properties. Property 1 – Former Public Works Site Since this property reflects vacant land, of the three primary approaches to value, the Sales Comparison Approach would be applied in valuing the land component of the subject property. The Cost and Income approaches would not be utilized because they typically are only applicable when the property contains improvements with contributory value. Though in some cases vacant land is leased, it is con cluded that there would likely be no demand for the subject property in terms of a land lease, given its location and other factors. The City has asked for four valuation scenarios for Property 1: 1. Value given development with commercial uses; 2. Value give n development with single -family residential uses; 3. Value given development with townhome residential uses; and 4. Value given development with multi -family residential uses. Typically land is appraised based on its highest and best use, which includes fou r main tests, all of which must be met in the following order : U ses that are legally permissible, phy sically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive (resulting in the highest value). Though an appraisal assignment for the subject land typically would not include a comprehensive feasibility study, typically it would include an analysis and discussion by the appraiser of general indications of demand and feasibility for a particular use , based on a review of market trends and appraiser experience ; such discussion and analysis would be followed by the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use, and the property would be valued based on that use. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 Since legal permissibility is the first test of highest and best use that must be met, in most cases , the appraiser’s focus is on current zoning and its allowed uses, when concluding highest and best use. However, there are exceptions, including when there is clear evidence that there is little or no demand for the currently allowed uses, t here is demonstrable demand for other uses, and it is reasonably probable that the property could be rezoned to allow such other uses. In the assignment of valuing Property 1, a unique situation exists in that the client (City of Arden Hills) has indicate d that it is willing to rezone and reguide within the comprehensive plan the property for alternative uses, including commercial and three forms of residential (single -family, townhome and multi -family). Consequently, the appraiser is free to examine and evaluate all four uses, since the City has indicated that all four uses are potentially legally permissible. However, the appraiser is likely to conclude only one highest and best use of the land, that use being the one which is not only legally permissib le, but also physically possible, financially feasible, and represents the maximally productive use of the land. Any other use scenarios would then not reflect the highest and best use, but for the purposes of this appraisal, since the City has asked for four alternative use values, for each use valuation it would be assumed that such use is the highest and best use, to be consistent with the concept and definition of market value. In valuing Property 1, first the land will be valued based on the appraise r’s concluded highest and best use, which is anticipated to be one of the four use alternatives the city has asked the appraiser to address. T hen , three subsequent valuations will follow, based on the other three alternat ive assumed highest and best uses. It is anticipated that for the three alternat ive uses beyond the concluded highest and best use of the property , an extraordinary assumption will be applied. An extraordinary assumption is defined as “An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appr aiser’s opinions or conclusions.” (s ource: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) 2016 -2017 Edition ©The Appraisal Foundation, Page 3 ). For the purposes of the appraisal , after valuing the land based on its concluded highest and best use , the land would then be valued based on the extraordinary assumption s that its highest and best use is for each of the three alternative uses previously mentioned. Property 2 – Existing City Hall Property The City has asked for four valuation scenarios for Property 2: 1. Value given development with commercial uses; 2. Value given development with single -family residential uses; 3. Value given development with townhome residential uses; and 4. Value given development with multi -family residential uses. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 4 Similar to the approach to valuing Property 1, as previously described, Property 2 will first be valued based on the appraiser’s concluded highest and best use, which is anticipated to be one of the four use alternatives the city has asked the appraiser to address. Then, three subsequent valuations will follow, based on the other three alternative assumed highest and best uses , with the application of an extraordinary assumption for each of the three alternative valuations . You have indicated that the City wishes to have the City Hall property appraisal include an analysis of the reuse potential of the existing building on the site, rather than simply be based on the assumption that the building should/would be demolished to make way for redevelopment of the entire 6.9 -acre si te. Therefore, depending on the results of such an analysis relative to potential reuse, the appraisal assignment may ultimately include valuing the building on the west approximately one -half of the site (reflecting a commercial use) and valuing the vacant land on the east part of the site based on four alternative use scenarios (commercial, single -family residential, townhome residential and multi -family residential). Regardless of whether continued use of the City Hall building together with development of the excess land , vs. demolition and redevelopment of the entire site , is concluded to be the highest and best use of the property , the appraisal assignment likely will include providing a value conclusion of the entire 6.9 -acre l and parcel for each of the four use scenarios requested . Assuming the City Hall building contributes material value to the overall property value, the appraisal assignment likely will include the application of all three primary approaches to value – The Cost, Sales Comparison and Income Approaches – when valuing the portion of the property containing the building and surrounding/supporting improv e ments. Report Format For each of the two subject properties, the appraisals will be communicated in separate reports, utilizing a narrative Appraisal Report format. The level of discussion and detail in the report will be similar to that contained in what is formerly known as the Summary Report format, a report type label which was discontinued by the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), effective January 1, 2014. The level of discussion in the report s to be issued to the client can be best described as summarizin g the subject property attributes and the appraisal process, but also providing enough information and detail to enable the client and intended users to understand the rationale for the appraiser’s opinions and conclusions. The report s will contain suppor ting data for the appraiser’s analysis and valuation, including comparable sales data and the adjustments made to the sales. For an assignment such as that described in this proposal, the appraisal report s would likely contain between 5 5 and 90 pages each. Additional notes, data, analyses and other documentation supporting the appraisal are retained in the office appraisal file. The appraisal s will be prepared in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Apprais al Institute, and with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), as mandated by the State of Minnesota. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 5 Proposed Appraisal Fee s Based on the anticipated scope of work involved in the assignment to appraise the subject propert ies and the complexity of issues that must be addressed to properly arrive at credible opinion s of market value for these particular propert ies , I propose the following appraisal fee s : Property 1 – Former Public Works Site $ 7,000 Property 2 – Curre nt City Hall Property $11,0 00 Total Proposed Appraisal Fees $1 8 ,0 00 The appraisal fees quoted are based on a package assignment involving the appraisal of both properties . The fees would differ from those quoted if the appraisal assignment were to cover only one or the other of the two subject properties. Completion Date The appraisal report s would be completed within 12 weeks of authorization to proceed. Deliverables A high -quality, full -color electronic copy of each appraisal report, in .pdf form, will be emailed to you upon completion of the assignment. Should the need or desire arise for one or more hard copies of the report s as well , our firm could print, bind and mail to you such hard copies, upon your request, with sufficient advance notice. Additional Information Attached for your review is a copy of my Professional Qualifications. For additional insight into our firm, please visit our website at www.brkw.com . Thank you, M r . Bachler , for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please contact me at 651 -646-6114 ext. 3 or pgleason@brkw.com with any questions or comments you may have . Sincerely, BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. Paul J. Gleason , MAI Principal Attachment BRKW APPRAISALS, INC . 1600 UNIVERSITY AVEN UE, SUITE 314, ST. P AUL, MN 55104 651.646.6114 F AX 651.646.8086 www.brkw.com PROFESSIONAL QUALIFI CATIONS PAUL J. GLEASON, MAI PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS MAI Member – The Appraisal Institute APPRAISER LICENSE Certified General Real Property Appraiser – State of Minnesota – License #4003073 EDUCATION University of Wisconsin at La Crosse , Wisconsin – 1985 Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Principal – BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 2007 -present Staff Appraiser – BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 1993 -2006 Appraiser – Certified Appraisers, Excelsior, MN, 1993 Appraiser – Stiles Appraisals, Inc., Plymouth, MN, 1992 -1993 Expert Witness Testimony – For real estate litigation in numerous condemnation commissioners’ hearings, arbitration hearings and in District Court Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2016 Right Of Way Professional s Workshop, Brainerd, MN Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2014 Right Of Way Professionals Workshop, Brainerd, MN Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2012 Right Of Way Professionals Workshop, Brainerd , MN Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2010 Right Of Way Professionals Workshop, Breezy Point, MN Appraisal assignments have been completed for the following purposes: Condemnation – Partial and total acquisitions, in fee title and in easement form Property Damage Claims Litigation Special Benefits Valuation Mortgage Financing General Valuation Needs – Purchase negotiations, listing prices, internal family or partnership transactions, estate planning/taxes, marriage dis solution, etc. Professional Qualifications – P aul J. Gleason , MAI Page 2 PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED Land – Commercial, industrial, residential acreage, agricultural, finished lots Commercial Buildings – Office, industrial, retail, medical office, auto dealerships Apartment Buildings/Complexes 1 -4 Family Residential – Single -f amily home, townhome, condo, duplex, fourplex PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES Appraisal Institute courses, including all required for MAI designation: Course 110: Appraisal Principles (examination passed) Course 120: Appraisal Procedures (examination passed) Course 210: Residential Case Study Course 310: Basic Income Capitalization Course 410: National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice Course 420: Business Practices and Ethics Course 510: Advanced Income Capitalization Course 5 20: Highest and Best Use and Market Analysis Course 530: Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches Course 540: Report Writing and Valuation Analysis Course 550: Advanced Applications Numerous additional classes and seminars for appraisal pre -licen se and continuing education requirements, on an ongoing basis, from Appraisal Institute and other sources CLIENTS INCLUDE Cities of Afton, Austin, Apple Valley, Cambridge, Cottage Grove, Eagan, Lino Lakes, Maplewood, Oak Park Heights, Owatonna, Prior Lak e, Rochester, Savage, Wabasha and Woodbury, among others Anchor Bank Associated Bank BMO Harris Bank N.A. Bremer Bank Bridgewater Bank Dougherty, Molenda, Solfest, Hills & Bauer, P.A. Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff Greene Espel PLLP & Vierling, PLLP Minnesota Bank & Trust Minnesota Dept. of Transportation US Bank Western Bank And various other individuals, attorneys, communities and counties Revised: January 1, 2017 From:Jason Messner To:Matthew Bachler Cc:Eric Zweber Subject:RE: City of Arden Hills Date:Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:30:17 PM Attachments:image005.jpg image006.jpg image001.jpg Matthew, Based on your clarification below, the cost to prepare an appraisal of the old city hall site, with four opinions of value based on either commercial or multi-family or townhomes or single family development; and a separate appraisal of the existing city hall site, with five opinions of value, including a valuation as currently improved and for either commercial or multi-family or townhomes or single family development, would not exceed $19,000 and could be completed within 12 weeks from receiving authorization to proceed. Let me know if you have any questions or require further information, Jason L. Messner, MAI Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser License 4000836 messner@valuationcounselors.net Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm 13961 West Preserve Boulevard Burnsville, MN 55337 (952)895-1205 Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Amble Drive Storm Sewer Repair Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $34,000 $8,250.00 Storm Water Fund Requested Action Accept bid after the fact from Valley-Rich Co., Inc. for storm sewer manhole repair at 1156 Amble Drive (Attachment A). Background Staff received a call from the property owner at 1156 Amble Drive (Attachment B) regarding a sinkhole in the rear yard adjacent to a manhole. After inspecting the manhole and adjacent pipe, it was determined that the storm sewer manhole had failed causing the adjacent ground to erode into the system causing the sinkhole. The existing storm sewer carries runoff from catch basins located in Amble Drive through a pipe located in a 10’ drainage easement to Karth Lake (Attachment C). Due to the slope of the yard, proximity of an existing retaining wall, and equipment required to access the site, staff contacted Valley-Rich to provide a quote to complete the repairs. Discussion Valley-Rich provided a not to exceed bid of $8,250. Public Works staff will work with the homeowner to complete any restoration work in the spring. Staff received approval from the City Council for emergency repairs due to the location of the hole (rear yard) and to prevent additional damage due to the proximity of a retaining wall. The work was scheduled for March 1st but was delayed to March 8th due to a snowfall event. CONSENT ITEM – 5G MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Financial Impact A budgeted amount of $34,000 is identified in the Storm Water budget for maintenance and repairs of which no funds have been expended to date. Attachments ATTACHMENT A: Valley Rich Bid ATTACHMENT B: Location Map – 1156 Amble Drive ATTACHMENT C: Record Drawing of Amble Drive Storm Sewer This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 100.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet100.0050.00 Notes Approximate manhole location Legend1156 Amble Drive City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries Airports Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Purchase Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources: $250,000 $196,157.00 Equipment Replacement Fund Requested Action Authorize the purchase of an Elgin Pelican street sweeper from MacQueen Equipment for a total cost of $196,157, which includes the trade in of the City’s 1997 Elgin Pelican sweeper in the amount of $8,000. Background In 1997 the City purchased an Elgin Pelican street sweeper for maintaining City streets and improvement of surface water quality. The sweeper is typically used three times a year, in the spring, summer and fall, to sweep all of the streets in the City. In addition, this piece of equipment has been essential after severe storms for cleanup and protection of surface water. Discussion The 2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes an item for the replacement of the 1997 sweeper (Unit 103). A copy of the detailed sheet from the CIP is attached (Attachment A). repair costs for parts and labor between 2006 and 2016 total $45,038 with the costs increasing substantially after year 15. The Equipment Replacement Guidelines recommend replacement of these units every 15 to 17 years. This unit is 20 years old. The proposed 2017 Elgin Pelican sweeper is equipped with less moving parts and an automatic greasing system. This will equate to fewer costly repairs and less down time. With the increased visibility for the operator and upgraded lighting, safety is significantly enhanced. The sealed cab CONSENT ITEM – 5H MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 is a healthier environment for the operator by reducing the dust, debris, and noise generated by the machine. The 2017 CIP has an estimated budget for the purchase of the new sweeper of $260,000 and a trade in value of $10,000 for a net budget of $250,000 for this purchase. The pricing quote (Attachment B) shows a purchase price of $204,157.00. With the $8,000.00 trade-in of the 1997 Elgin sweeper, the total purchase price of the unit is $196,157.00, well below the estimated budget. The pricing provided in this quote is as listed in the Minnesota State contract. Attachments ATTACHMENT A: Equipment CIP ATTACHMENT B: Quote from MacQueen Equipment ATTACHMENT C: Photos of 1997 Elgin sweeper (Unit 103) SAME AS BELOW 01 - MACQUEEN EQUIP 02/22/2017 14:02:11 (O) 1 02 ARDEN001 6517927800 Q00346 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS JF 1245 W HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 JUDD GENEREAUX 126 Description ** Q U O T E ** EXPIRY DATE: 03/17/2017 Amount ELGIN PELICAN NP ELGIN PELICAN NP 204157.00 - PRICING BASED OFF MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #103153 PRICING INCLUDES: HI BACK AIR RIDE SEAT-RIGHT AUTO LUBE IN CAB GUTTER BROOM TILT BATTERY DISCONNECT HYDRAULIC TEMP AND LEVEL SHUTDOWN DUAL LED STROBE LED LIGHTS IN BATTERY COVER LIMB GUARD-RIGHT LED ARROWBOARD CLEARANCE LIGHTS SERVICE MANUAL - FREIGHT, DELIVERY AND TRAINING INCLUDED Sale # 01 Subtotal: 204157.00 TOTAL: 204157.00 Trade Ins ========= 1997 ELGIN PELICAN SE SINGLE Serial #: 18516S 8000.00- Trade In Total: 8000.00- Subtotal: 196157.00 Authorization: _________________________ Quote Total: 196157.00 1997 Elgin Street Sweeper Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: 2017 Trail and Watermain Projects – Engineering Services Requested Action Approve the scope and fee from WSB & Associates (Attachment A) in the amount of $90,942.00 for preliminary design services for the CR E2 Trail, the Old Snelling Trail from Bethel Drive to CR E2 and the Old Snelling Water Main Improvement Project (City Project No. 17-W-001); and final design for the Old Snelling Trail from CR E to Bethel Trail and CR E from Freeway Park to Snelling Avenue N. Background At the February 21, 2017 City Council Workshop, staff brought forward a scope and fee for preliminary design, final design and construction services for the projects listed above. The City Council requested that the scope be limited to preliminary design for the CR E2, the northern segment of the Old Snelling Trail (Bethel Drive to CR E2), and the Old Snelling water main loop; and final design of the Old Snelling Trail from CR E to Bethel Trail and CR E from Freeway Park to Snelling Avenue N. Discussion The scope, fee and schedule are detailed in Attachment A. Staff has identified each phase (preliminary design, final design and construction services) for each project. The amount that is requested for approval is as follows: Preliminary Design - CR E2 Trail 70 $ 8,977 Final Design - Old Snelling Trail (E-Bethel Dr) 375 $42,604 Preliminary Design - Old Snelling Trail (Bethel Dr-E2) 200 $23,589 Preliminary Design - Watermain Looping 120 $15,772 Grand Total 765 $90,942 CONSENT ITEM – 5I MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Financial Impacts The following table outlines the project costs and funding sources. PROJECT Est. Total Project Cost CIP FUNDING SOURCE (CIP) CR E2 Trail $128,000 $100,000 Ramsey County/MSAS Old Snelling Tr. – Bethel to E2 $683,000 $425,000 Ramsey County/MSAS Old Snelling Tr. – CR E to Bethel * $882,170 $1,400,000 PIR($300,000)/Developer Reimbursement ($800,000)/Ramsey County ($300,000) Total Trail Costs $1,693,170 $1,925,000 Old Snelling/E2 Watermain Loop $700,000 $400,000 Water Utility *Based on Feasibility Study prepared by Elfering Engineering Attachments: Attachment A: Scope and Fee – WSB & Associates Page 1 of 2 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Dump Truck Purchase Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources: $240,000 $197,352.40 Equipment Replacement Fund Requested Action Authorize the purchase of a 2018 Mack chassis from Nuss Truck & Equipment ($87,808.40) and Towmaster dump truck body, including plow and de-icing equipment ($109,544.00) for a total cost of $197,352.40, which includes the trade in of the City’s 2001 Sterling dump truck in the amount of $18,000.00. Background In 2011 the City purchased a used 2001 Sterling dump truck with plow and de-icing equipment from Ramsey County. While the possibility of purchasing another used truck from the County was considered. However, they currently do not have any trucks available and will not until 2019. In addition, many replacement parts for the Sterling chassis are no longer available due to the line not being produced for several years which not only affects the City’s current truck but also the next available Ramsey County truck. The County is currently replacing the old Sterling trucks with Mack trucks and has the equipment to complete the repairs. The dump truck is used for plowing in the winter and to haul materials for paving projects in the summer as well as for hauling materials during utility repairs. There is currently no back up equipment should this truck become inoperable. The City’s 2001 dump truck currently has mileage of 47,630 with 3,870 hours of operation. CONSENT ITEM – 5J MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Discussion The 2017/18 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes an item for the replacement of the 2001 dump truck (Unit 116). A copy of the detailed sheet from the CIP is attached (Attachment A). repair costs for parts and labor between 2003 and 2016 total $16,146. As previously mentioned, parts for the 16-year-old Sterling chassis are no longer available. The 2017/18 CIP has an estimated budget for the purchase of the new dump truck of $250,000 and a trade in value of $10,000 for a net budget of $240,000 for this purchase. The truck was initially budgeted over two years due to an 18-month build out process. TowMaster has indicated that the truck can be completed in 2017 with and estimated delivery date in October. The pricing quote (Attachment B) shows a purchase price from Nuss Truck & Equipment of $87,808.40, with the $18,000.00 trade-in of the 2001 truck, and 109,544.00 from TowMaster. the total purchase price of the unit is $197,352.40 including tax and licensing, well below the estimated budget. The pricing provided in the quotes are as listed in the Minnesota State contract. Attachments ATTACHMENT A: Equipment CIP ATTACHMENT B: Quotes from Nuss Truck & Equipment and TowMaster ATTACHMENT C: Photos of 2001 Sterling dump truck (Unit 116) Dump Truck – Unit 116 CONSENT ITEM – 5K MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William Joynes, City Administrator FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Round Lake Road Final Payment #12 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources: $1,806,738.51 $1,806,738.51 MSA, TIF, Assessments, Water Utility, Surface Water Funds, PIR Requested Action Approve Final Payment #12 to Meyer Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $90,336.91 for the Round Lake Road Improvements Project. Background The City Council awarded the Round Lake Road Improvements Project to Meyer Contracting, Inc. on May 12, 2014, in the amount of $1,766,605.41. With change orders and quantity deductions, the final contract amount is $1,806,738.51. Discussion There was no additional work performed for payment with this pay estimate, it simply reflects the release of the 5% retainage. Final payment #12 is in the amount $90,336.91. The Contractor has provided all necessary closeout documentation. Elfering & Associates has provided a letter (Attachment A) recommending approval of the final payment. Financial Implications With the final payment, the total amount paid to the contractor is $1,806,738.51 which is $40,133.10 over the awarded contract amount and approved by Council through the change order process. Attachments Attachment A: Elfering letter Attachment B: Final Payment Estimate #12 DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Mayor Grant SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) Development Discussion Opportunity for Residents Discussion Under this Public Hearing, citizens have an opportunity to discuss ideas regarding Rice Creek Commons (TCAAP) development. PUBLIC HEARING – 7A MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING – 7B MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Dave Perrault, Finance Analyst Pang Silseth, Accounting Clerk SUBJECT: Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Background: Delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated February 8, 2017 were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by March 8, 2017. Utility accounts with an unpaid delinquent balance after March 8, 2017 would be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property taxes payable in 2018. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an eight percent penalty. A list of remaining delinquent utility accounts, as of March 9, 2017 is attached. The City will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the respective properties. Recommended Action: Motion to approve Resolution 2017-008 certifying the attached list of delinquent utility accounts to Ramsey County. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution No. 2017-008 Attachment B: List of Delinquent Utility Accounts CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-008 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING QUARTERLY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT UTILITIES WHEREAS, the amount to be specially assessed for DELINQUENT UTILITIES has been duly calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Minnesota Statues; and WHEREAS, notices have been duly mailed as required by law; and WHEREAS, said proposed assessments have at all times since their filling been open for public inspection, and an opportunity has been given to all interest parties to present objections if any, to the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, there were no oral or written objections received. 1. The amounts so calculated and set forth in said notices are hereby levied against the respective parcels of land described therein, and 2. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as special assessments for each of said parcels of land and the assessments together with an additional penalty of eight percent (8%) of the original unpaid amount, inclusive of any previous delinquency penalty, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the City Administrator be authorized and directed to transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll to be extended upon the property tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall collect said special assessments with taxes levied in 2017, payable in 2018: ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017. ____________________________________ ATTEST: DAVID GRANT, MAYOR __________________________________________ JULIE HANSON, CITY CLERK PID Account No Service Address Utility Arrears 8% Cert Fee Total Assessment 163023340007 001280-000 4633 Old Highway 10 157.79 12.62 170.41 163023340015 001285-000 4627 Highway 10 193.15 15.45 208.60 213023140006 001271-000 4401 Old Highway 10 122.30 9.78 132.08 213023140007 001276-000 4375 Old Highway 10 122.30 9.78 132.08 213023410028 006494-000 1675 Brueberry Lane 177.89 14.23 192.12 213023410051 001584-000 1681 Brueberry Lane 157.59 12.61 170.20 223023110064 000561-000 4500 Pleasant Drive 199.25 15.94 215.19 223023120013 000569-000 1307 Karth Lake Circle 284.34 22.75 307.09 223023130039 000158-000 4440 Hamline Avenue N 94.78 7.58 102.36 223023210048 000434-000 1383 Arden View Drive 167.82 13.43 181.25 223023210057 000454-000 1393 Arden View Drive 94.29 7.54 101.83 223023210083 000446-000 1415 Arden View Drive 206.04 16.48 222.52 223023210117 005368-000 1450 Arden View Drive 175.46 14.04 189.50 223023230016 007235-000 1528 McClung Drive 200.86 16.07 216.93 223023240168 004045-000 1465 Arden View Drive 179.83 14.39 194.22 223023240240 003444-000 4412 Arden View Court 443.91 35.51 479.42 223023240278 000293-000 4445 Arden View Court 578.28 46.26 624.54 223023240303 006254-000 4394 Arden View Court 219.08 17.53 236.61 223023240322 009989-000 4478 Arden View Court 249.92 19.99 269.91 223023240326 000375-000 4370 Arden View Court 167.14 13.37 180.51 223023240336 000367-000 4335 Arden View Court 178.03 14.24 192.27 223023240347 003135-000 4322 Arden View Court 239.45 19.16 258.61 223023310011 005075-000 1388 Colleen Avenue 166.11 13.29 179.40 223023310044 010039 000 1418 I di O k T il 201 75 16 14 217 89223023310044010039-000 1418 Indian Oaks Trail 201.75 16.14 217.89 223023320026 008331-000 1469 Colleen Avenue 278.76 22.30 301.06 223023320035 000860-000 1550 Briarknoll Circle 207.01 16.56 223.57 223023330015 004713-000 4149 Norma Avenue 220.01 17.60 237.61 223023340047 000602-000 4101 Gale Circle 172.32 13.79 186.11 223023420032 000777-000 1286 Wyncrest Lane 330.88 26.47 357.35 273023140005 002805-000 3930 Northwoods Drive 5,894.00 471.52 6,365.52 283023120052 001575-000 1761 Lake Valentine Road 195.24 15.62 210.86 283023240021 001082-000 1822 Venus Avenue 208.49 16.68 225.17 283023310011 008299-000 1920 County Road E2 W 179.66 14.37 194.03 283023310016 002879-000 3786 Brighton Way 268.87 21.51 290.38 283023320040 009982-000 3820 Cleveland Ave N, Unit 100 260.19 20.82 281.01 283023330012 003256-000 2023 Thom Drive 143.84 11.51 155.35 283023440022 001441-000 1683 Chatham Avenue 343.87 27.51 371.38 333023110036 001551-000 1611 Lake Johanna Boulevard 258.97 20.72 279.69 333023240027 002204-000 1840 Grant Road 255.52 20.44 275.96 333023240032 002096-000 1876 Grant Road 264.13 21.13 285.26 333023240094 002105-000 1873 Stowe Avenue 186.74 14.94 201.68 333023240098 004228-000 1901 Stowe Avenue 173.28 13.86 187.14 333023240108 002512-000 1850 Indian Place 363.03 29.04 392.07 333023310012 009130-000 1910 Stowe Avenue 184.05 14.72 198.77 333023310041 002958-000 3243 Lake Johanna Boulevard 376.65 30.13 406.78 333023320003 002476-000 1950 Stowe Avenue 188.71 15.10 203.81 333023320032 002857-000 3334 Katie Lane 333.65 26.69 360.34 PID Account No Service Address Utility Arrears 8% Cert Fee Total Assessment 333023320044 002633-000 3304 Katie Lane 160.92 12.87 173.79 333023320071 010688-000 3284 Katie Lane 20.15 1.61 21.76 333023330034 002487-000 2028 Edgewater Avenue 227.24 18.18 245.42 333023340020 001884-000 3223 Lake Johanna Boulevard 256.68 20.53 277.21 333023340067 009129-000 1927 Glenpaul Avenue 199.11 15.93 215.04 333023420038 001969-000 3290 Lake Johanna Boulevard 200.48 16.04 216.52 343023140015 010758-000 1132 Benton Way 24.26 1.94 26.20 343023140042 002482-000 1177 Benton Way 151.40 12.11 163.51 343023140051 002484-000 1168 Benton Way 92.97 7.44 100.41 343023140062 002397-000 1150 Benton Way 259.18 20.73 279.91 343023210016 001920-000 1437 Arden Place 183.26 14.66 197.92 343023210039 003180-000 1450 Arden Place 186.91 14.95 201.86 343023210046 002029-000 1369 Forest Lane 275.18 22.01 297.19 343023220009 002544-000 3505 Siems Court 230.58 18.45 249.03 343023230017 002369-000 1532 Arden Place 188.68 15.09 203.77 343023310046 001898-000 1468 Bussard Court 122.30 9.78 132.08 343023410055 001808-000 1171 Carlton Drive 482.07 38.57 520.64 343023420030 008243-000 1277 Ingerson Road 1,526.83 122.15 1,648.98 343023420040 003660-000 1305 Tiller Lane 204.63 16.37 221.00 343023430002 001933-000 3240 Hamline Avenue N 145.78 11.66 157.44 21,403.84 1,712.31 23,116.15 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-005 - Boston Scientific - Wetland Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-005 Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS – 7C MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-005 Applicant: Boston Scientific Property Location: 4100 Hamline Avenue North Request: Vacation of Drainage Easement Requested Action Approve Resolution No. 2017-006 to vacate a part of the drainage easement granted to the City of Arden Hills and recorded as Document No. 2671697 on the Boston Scientific campus, located at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. Background There are several wetlands on the Boston Scientific campus that are protected by drainage easements granted to the City or Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Between 2006 and 2015, Boston Scientific completed grading work in the area between Buildings 10 and 14 to establish a snow storage area that resulted in the unintentional filling of two wetlands (see Attachment B). One wetland was entirely filled while the other was partially filled. Both of these wetlands were covered by a drainage easement granted to the City in 1992 in Document Number 2671697. Boston Scientific has requested that the City approve a vacation of that part of the drainage easement that covered the two impacted wetlands. The easement covers other wetland areas on the property that would not be impacted as a result of the proposed vacation. Boston Scientific is currently working with RCWD to address the wetland impact issue. The City approved the original campus Master Plan for Boston Scientific in 2002, and the company was required to obtain permits from RCWD at that time for construction projects that resulted in the loss of wetlands. Boston Scientific intentionally created excess wetland mitigation credits for use with future development plans on the site. These credits will be City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-005 - Boston Scientific - Wetland Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-005 Page 2 of 3 applied towards the unapproved wetland removal and it does not appear that additional mitigation will be required at this time. Discussion The City will typically require property owners to grant drainage easements at the time of subdivision or new development in order to protect private drainage facilities that connect into and impact public stormwater infrastructure. The purpose of having these easements in place is to ensure that the City can perform maintenance on private stormwater facilities in the event the work is not completed by the property owner. The legal document for the easement states that at the time it was granted, it was the policy of RCWD to request that property owners convey to the appropriate municipality drainage easements over protected wetlands. The purpose of this policy was, in part, to notify future property owners of land use limitations. The Public Works Director has reviewed the proposed easement vacation and provided a memo addressing why that part of the easement that would be vacated is not needed for public purposes (Attachment D). Both wetland areas were naturally occurring and were not modified to serve as stormwater drainage facilities for the Boston Scientific campus. Notice of Public Hearing Drainage easement vacations require a public hearing before the City Council. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Public Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or residents in regards to this request. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2017-006 to vacate a part of the drainage easement granted to the City of Arden Hills and recorded as Document No. 2671697 on the Boston Scientific campus, located at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-005 - Boston Scientific - Wetland Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-005 Page 3 of 3 Options 1. Approve the proposal as submitted. 2. Deny the application with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "…it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request." 3. Table for additional information. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on February 10, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by April 11, 2017 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Aerial Map of Boston Scientific Campus C. Boston Scientific Campus Plat Map D. Memo from Public Works Director/City Engineer Sue Polka, dated March 8, 2017 E. Resolution No. 2017-006 County Road F 0 400 800200Feet.Boston Scientific C amp us L e x i n g t o n A v e n u e PC 17-005 - Drainage Easement Vacation - Boston Scientific, 4100 Hamline Avenue North H a m l i n e A v e n u e Cumm ings Park Drive Approximate location of impacted wetlands Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 8, 2017 TO: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner FROM: Sue Polka, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Boston Scientific Drainage Easement Vacation I have reviewed the proposed easement vacation have determined that the easement should be vacated as it serves no public purpose. Both wetland areas were naturally occurring and are not a part of the public storm water system . MEMORANDUM 191334v1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-006 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE EASEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 412.851, the Arden Hills City Council has conducted a hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of a drainage easement located in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that the drainage easement is not needed for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills: 1. The drainage easement legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder/Registrar of Titles. ADOPTED this ____ day of March, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: ________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk 191334v1 EXHIBIT “A” to RESOLUTION NO. 2017-006 That part of the drainage easement granted to the City of Arden Hills, dated August 12, 1992, recorded September 8, 1992 as Document No. 2671697 which is described as follows: That part of the south 30 acres of the north 44 acres of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter distant 1310.78 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds West, assumed bearing, perpendicular to said east line 207.50 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be herein described; thence North 52 degrees 05 minutes 59 seconds West 120.00 feet; thence South 67 degrees 13 minutes West 37.00 feet; thence South 12 degrees 21 minutes 56 seconds East 80.00 feet; thence South 49 degrees 30 minutes East 45.00 feet; thence South 85 degrees 03 minutes 27 seconds East 37.57 feet; thence North 38 degrees 00 minutes 14 seconds East 65.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. also Commencing at a point on the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter distant 1377.90 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds West, assumed bearing, perpendicular to said east line 68.92 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be herein described; thence South 67 degrees 10 minutes 24 seconds West 30.02 feet; thence North 26 degrees 33 minutes 39 seconds West 150.00 feet; thence North 59 degrees 21 minutes 53 seconds West 64.98 feet; thence North 38 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds West 51.25 feet; thence North 19 degrees 30 seconds East 22.54 feet; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes East 20.00 feet; thence South 40 degrees 57 minutes East 35.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes East 20.00 feet; thence North 31 degrees 26 minutes 20 seconds East 35.60 feet; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes East 25.00 feet; thence South 17 degrees 30 minutes East 35.00 feet; thence South 17 degrees 17 minutes West 52.49 feet; thence South 71 degrees 03 minutes 34 seconds East 40.37 feet; thence South 22 degrees 48 minutes 21 seconds East 70.28 feet; thence South 7 degrees 36 minutes 19 seconds East 60.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. 191334v1 EXHIBIT “B” to RESOLUTION NO. 2017-006 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan Page 1 of 3 NEW BUSINESS – 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers William S. Joynes, Sr., City Administrator FROM: Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consider Proposal from WSB & Associates to Complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources: $100,000 $100,300.00 General Fund Sewer Fund Stormwater Fund Sewer Fund Requested Action Consider the Proposed Scope and Budget to Provide Services to Complete the 2040 Update to the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan from WSB & Associates (Attachment A). Background At the City Council Work Session on February 21, 2017, the Council reviewed a proposal from WSB & Associates to complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal was based on a draft RFP written by staff for the project. The Council directed staff to revise the scope of work in the RFP to only include those items required to be addressed by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council provides a checklist of the minimum requirements for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the checklist for Arden Hills is included in Attachment B. The draft RFP has since been revised based on this checklist (Attachment C). WSB has provided a revised proposal based on the draft RFP with a total cost of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at $100,300 (Attachment D). A proposal is not a contract. Therefore, WSB has also prepared a Proposed Scope and Budget to Provide Services to Complete the 2040 Update to the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan (Attachment A). If the City Council chooses to City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan Page 2 of 3 approve this proposed scope and budget, it will become a part of the professional service agreement with the City to provide engineering and other professional services. Discussion Work Plan WSB has updated their proposal based on the revised RFP. The work plan includes the following plan elements that are specifically required by the Metropolitan Council: • Land Use • Housing • Transportation • Wastewater • Surface Water • Water Supply • Parks and Trails • Implementation Other changes to the proposal include a reduction in the number of City Council and volunteer committee meetings and the removal of the public open house. The proposal does include the option to add an open house if the City Council chooses at an additional cost of $2,000. Public engagement will be provided for primarily online through a dedicated project website known as mySidewalk. Financial Impact In the proposal presented on February 21, 2017, WSB included a project budget of $131,050. The revised proposal has a total budget of $100,300. The water supply model would be an additional $6,000 if the City determines this work is needed. The changes in costs from the February 21 proposal for each section of the Comprehensive Plan are listed in the table below. Comprehensive Plan Element 02/21/2017 Proposal 03/13/2017 Proposal Public Engagement & City Meetings $11,000 $6,800 Background and Demographics $5,000 $4,800 Housing $6,750 $5,100 Land Use $9,500 $8,500 Economic Development $4,500 $0 (Not Required) Parks and Trails $15,000 $6,000 Surface Water Management $22,000 $22,000 Transportation $20,000 $16,900 Water Supply $7,800 $7,000 Wastewater $20,000 $19,000 Implementation $6,250 $3,900 Metropolitan Council Coordination $3,250 $300 Total $131,050 $100,300 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for March 13, 2017 P:\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\2018 Comprehensive Plan\Memos_Reports_2040 Comp Plan Page 3 of 3 The contract for consulting services includes a provision that the project cost will be a not-to- exceed amount. The overall project cost may be reduced if the City fills the vacant Community Development Director position in the future and is able to commit more staff resources to completing sections of the plan. The 2017 Budget includes $100,000 in the General Fund for the Comprehensive Plan Update. After analysis of the proposed work scope and discussions with the City’s Finance Director, certain elements of the plan can be charged to the enterprise funds as listed in the table below, thereby lowering the impact to the General Fund. Funding Sources 2017 Budget Actual Expense Planning & Zoning Professional Services (General Fund) $100,000 $52,300 Sanitary Sewer Fund $0 $19,000 Surface Water Management Fund $0 $22,000 Water Fund $0 $7,000 Attachments A. Proposed Scope and Budget to Provide Services to Complete the 2040 Update to the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan B. Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Minimum Checklist for Arden Hills C. Draft RFP for Comprehensive Plan Update D. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal, WSB & Associates, March 8, 2017 March 13 Mr. William City Admi City of Ard 1245 Wes Arden Hill RE: P C Dear Mr. J We appre Arden Hill BACKGR Per the di services t multi-face Transport Environm and plans PROJECT Below is a completin Task 1: B Collectio C O 1.1 E 1.2 E 1.3 P P ch em Cost: $4,8 Building , 2017 m S. Joynes, nistrator den Hills st Highway 96 ls, MN 55112 roposed Scop Comprehensiv Joynes, eciate the opp ls’ Comprehen ROUND rection from t o assist the c eted Compreh tation Plannin ental Service s. T APPROAC a listing of the g these tasks Background a n of Informa Collect informa Ordinance, Cit xamination o xamine Build reparation o repare exhibi harts of demo mployment da 800 a legacy – your leg Sr. 6 pe and Budge ve Plan portunity to pre nsive Plan. the February city in complet hensive Plann ng, Traffic Mod es, and Lands H/SCOPE OF e required com s. We are ha and Demogr ation ation on previ ty Code, and of Demograp Historic and Population Household Net worth b Household Household Race and e ding Permit of Exhibits its including o ographic infor ata. gacy. Equal Op w et to Provide esent this pro 21 City Coun tion of the 20 ning team incl deling, Water scape Architec F SERVICES mponents to c ppy to refine raphic Comp ous planning Capital Impro phic Informa d projected po age distributi incomes by a by age of hou tenure by ag type ethnicity and Valuatio overview, regi rmation and h pportunity Employ wsbeng.com P:\Plann Services to C oposal to prov ncil Work Ses 40 Update to ludes profess r/Wastewater cture to offer S complete a C this scope if d onent studies, exis ovement Plan tion opulation and ion age of househ seholder e of househo on Data ional context, historical, curr yer ning\Personal\Eric Zweber\Co Complete the vide services sion, the follo the Arden Hi sionals in Com Infrastructure our Integrate omprehensiv directed by th sting Compreh . d household g holder older year built, an rent, and futur 7 S M T F omp Plan\AH 2040 Comp Pla 2040 Update for the compl owing is a pro ills Comprehe mmunity Plann e Planning an d Design App ve Plan Updat he City Counc hensive Plan, growth nd regional de re housing, p 701 Xenia Avenue Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 5 Tel: 763‐541‐4800 Fax: 763‐541‐1700 an WSB Scope of Services 031 e to the Arden letion of the C oposal to prov ensive Plan. ning, nd Design, proach to proj te, and a cost cil. Zoning esignation ma opulation, an South 55416 0 0 132017.docx n Hills City of vide Our jects t for aps; d ATTACHMENT A Mr. Joynes March 13, 2017 Page 2 Task 2: Public Participation 2.1 Finalize Public Participation Plan 2.2 Joint City Council/Planning Commission Kick-Off Meeting (1) Finalize roles and schedule, review Vision and convey responsibilities. 2.3 Planning Commission Meetings (4) This includes attendance at four Planning Commission meetings to discuss housing and land use requirements; implementation and capital improvement plan (CIP); draft Comprehensive Plan and the required Public Hearing. 2.4 City Council Meetings (3) This includes attendance at three City Council meetings to reviewing the draft housing and land use chapters, draft Comprehensive Plan and approval of the Plan. 2.5 Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting (1) This includes attendance at one Park Commission meeting to review the draft Parks and Recreation chapter. 2.6 Online Engagement (My Sidewalk) Program and implement an online interface to engage effectively with the public. Cost: $6,800 Task 3: Housing Component 3.1 Housing Data Compile all appropriate GIS and other data on housing. 3.2 Preparation of Exhibits Prepare exhibits including charts of the existing housing stock by age, type, tenure and value and a map of owner occupied housing value. 3.3 Affordable Housing Tools List of City of Arden Hills affordable housing tools and list the barriers to implementing additional tools in compliance with the Metropolitan Council’s Housing Policy Plan. 3.4 Housing Goals and Implementation Steps Create goals and implementation steps regarding housing based on the community vision and with Planning Commission assistance. 3.5 Draft and Revision of Housing Chapter Create one (1) draft of the housing chapter and one (1) revision to the housing chapter. Cost: $5,100 Task 4: Land Use Component 4.1 Land Use Data Compile all appropriate GIS and other data on existing land uses. 4.2 Demand Compatibility Analysis Determine residential demand based on the Housing Chapter. Evaluate if the demand determine is compatible with the population and housing forecasts provided in Thrive 2040. Mr. Joynes March 13, 2017 Page 3 4.3 Land Use Requirements per Policy Determine the amount and type of residential land uses needed to meet the requirements of the Housing Policy Plan’s affordable housing allocation. 4.4 Land Use Category Analysis Examine the 2030 Comprehensive Plan land use categories and determine if those land use categories can be carried over into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Modify existing land use categories or create new land use categories as needed. 4.5 Chart Preparation Prepare charts of 2010 generalized land uses, the 2016 zoning districts, the existing 2030 land use designations, the 2040 land use designations. Using these charts, determine the amount of land that would be required to redevelop to meet the Housing Policy Plan’s affordable housing allocation. 4.6 Map Preparation Prepare maps of Aggregate Resources, the 2010 generalized land uses, the existing 2030 Land Use Map, and the 2040 Land Use Map. 4.7 Land Use Goals and Implementation Steps Create goals and implementation steps for land use and growth management based on the community vision, the meetings and feedback gathered during task 2.2 through 2.5, and with Planning Commission and City Council assistance. 4.8 Statutory Requirements Address the statutory requirements regarding aggregate resources and solar access. 4.9 Draft and Revision of Land Use Chapter Create one (1) draft of the land use chapter and two (2) revisions to the land use chapter. Cost: $8,500 Task 5: Parks and Trails Component 5.1 Regional Parks System Describe, map, and label the Regional Parks System facilities within and directly adjacent to Arden Hills. 5.2 City Parks and Trails Describe and map Arden Hills’ existing and proposed parks, trails, and recreation facilities. Include planned parks and trail capital expenditures into the capital improvement plan (CIP). 5.3 Revise the Existing Parks and Recreation Chapter Update the appropriate text of the 2008 Parks and Recreation chapter as update and amended in December 2016. Cost: $6,000 Task 6: Surface Water Management Component 6.1 Arden Hills and Rice Creek Watershed District Plans Review the existing Arden Hills Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) and the newly adopted Rick Creek Watershed District (RCWD) SWMP. Address requirements of the RCWD SWMP. Mr. Joynes March 13, 2017 Page 4 6.2 Identify Problems and Corrective Actions Indentify problems list in the RCWD SWMP and based on interviews with City staff. Develop corrective actions for each problem. This task includes updates relating to the NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates. 6.3 Goals, Policies, and Priorities Identify and describe goals and policies and set priorities based on input from the City staff and City Council. 6.4 Implementation Plan Create an implementation plan based on the SWMP priorities including identifying potential funding sources. 6.5 Draft and Revision of SWMP One draft of the SWMP and one revision to the SWMP. Cost: $22,000 Task 7: Transportation Component 7.1 Transportation Analysis Zones Run the Metropolitan Council transportation model and assign population, household, and employment by Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). 7.2 Roadways Describe and map existing/future volumes, function class, lanes, capacity needs and arterial routes. Incorporate MnDOT and Ramsey County access guidelines and planned improvements. Indentify right-of-way preservation needs and short and long range projects and studies to identify needs. 7.3 Transit Describe transit market area and existing and planned transit infrastructure and services. 7.4 Aviation Identify policies that protect regional airspace from obstructions. 7.5 Freight Identify and map heavy commercial average daily trips on arterial routes, railroads, and freight terminals. Identify freight generating nodes and freight bottlenecks. 7.6 Draft and Revision of Transportation Chapter One draft of the transportation chapter and one revision to the transportation chapter. Cost: $16,900 Task 8: Water Supply Component 8.1 Existing Water Supply Plan Compile and review all appropriate GIS and other data including the City Code, Fee Schedule, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 8.2 System Routing Evaluate existing water mains and record of water main breaks and repairs. Recommend necessary water main replacements, expansions, and/or extensions. Mr. Joynes March 13, 2017 Page 5 8.3 Draft and Revision of Water Supply Chapter One draft of the water supply chapter and one revision to the water supply chapter. Cost: $7,000 Task 9: Wastewater Component 9.1 Existing Wastewater Supply Plan Compile and review all appropriate GIS and other data including the City Code, Fee Schedule, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 9.2 Capacity Analysis Calculate wastewater demands and evaluate existing wastewater mains, lift stations, and record of failures. Recommend necessary lift station reconstruction or wastewater main replacements, expansions, and/or extensions. 9.3 Maps and Figures Exhibits including maps and charts of the existing and proposed wastewater demand and infrastructure. 9.4 Goals and Policies Create goals and implementation steps based on wastewater demand and the age and quality of the existing infrastructure. 5.5 Draft and Revision of Wastewater Chapter One draft of the wastewater chapter and one revision to the wastewater chapter. Cost: $19,000 Task 10: Implementation Component 10.1 Existing Ordinances and Regulations Compile all appropriate GIS and other data including the Zoning Ordinance, City Code, Fee Schedule, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 10.2 City Code Implications Provide recommendations on zoning districts, rezonings, development fees and CIP amendments to implement the goals and implementation steps from the land use chapter. 10.3 Land Use and Zoning Intersection Exhibits including charts of zoning district standards and the existing zoning map. 10.4 Goals and Policies Create goals and implementation steps for implementation based on the community vision, the meetings and feedback gathered during Task One and with Planning Commission and City Council assistance. 10.5 Draft and Revision of Implementation Chapter One draft of the implementation chapter and one revision to the implementation chapter. Cost: $3,900 Mr. Joynes March 13, 2017 Page 6 Task 11: Metropolitan Council Meetings and Other Required Components 11.1 Distribution of Draft Distribute the draft Comprehensive Plan to the affected jurisdictions per the Metropolitan Council requirements. Cost: $300 Total Not to Exceed Project Costs of Tasks 1 through 11 - $100,300 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Due to the extensive scope and length of time in the development of a Comprehensive Plan, there are times when additional services beyond the proposed scope of service could be desired by the City. Should the City Council chose for additional services, the following costs are provided: Public Open Houses: $2,000 each meeting Additional Council/Commission/Committee Meetings: $1,250 each meeting Water Supply Model: $6,000 These additional services will not be provided without specific direction from the City Council. CONCULSION On behalf of the entire WSB team, thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide services to update the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is a not to exceed cost proposal. If City staff chooses to complete any of the tasks described, that amount will be deducted from the total cost of the proposal. The proposal cost will be honored for 90 days from March 13, 2017. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Eric Zweber, AICP Senior Planner ACCEPTED BY: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA The City of Arden Hills hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $100,300 for the services outlined in this letter proposal, as well as the additional fees for components below by initialing behind those selected for inclusion in this proposal. Signature: N a m e / T i t l e : D a t e : Page - 1 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills CHECKLIST OF MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ARDEN HILLS The checklist below was compiled from information on the Plan Elements pages in the Local Planning Handbook under the “Minimum Requirements” sections of the respective topics. Please note that this information is subject to change. The most current information can always be found on the website. Also, please remember that additional information may be requested during the review process for clarification and accuracy by the Technical Review staff. If you have any questions, please contact your Sector Representative. LAND USE Forecasts and Community Designation 伫伫Include a table of forecasted population, households, and employment for 2020, 2030, and 2040, consistent with the Council’s forecasts. 伫Remember, Council forecasts must be used consistently throughout your entire comprehensive plan. 伫Your transportation plan needs to allocate forecasts to transportation analysis zones (TAZs). 伫Your water and wastewater plans need to reflect forecasts to plan for urban services. 伫Your land use plan must reflect and be coordinated with your forecasts. 伫Include a map acknowledging your regional Community Designation(s) and acknowledge the overall density expectations for your Community Designation(s). 伫Each Community Designation identifies both Council and Community Roles in Thrive’s land use policy section. Plans must be consistent with Community Roles for your Community Designation(s) as well as Community Roles that apply to everyone. Existing Land Use 伫Provide an Existing Land Use Map with a land use legend. 伫Provide an Existing Land Use Table. Calculate total acres and percent of total acres for each land use category. 伫Land uses categories on the map and in the table, as well as any text references must all be consistent with one another. 伫Show existing regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features with a land use of “Park” (or your equivalent) on your Existing Land Use Map. Future Land Use 伫The Future Land Use plan must be consistent with the Council’s forecasts of population, households, and employment and identify sufficient land to support your community’s forecasted growth. 伫Provide a Future Land Use Map and land use legend, including density ranges for all land uses that allow residential development. 伫Provide a Future Land Use Table. Calculate total acres and percent of total acres for each land use category for each 10- year planning period (2020, 2030, and 2040). 伫Define each land use category shown on the Future Land Use Map. Land use categories must be used consistently throughout your plan. 伫Land use categories must include types of allowed uses and the minimum and maximum densities (“the allowable density range”) for all categories that allow residential uses. Allowed uses should include a description of allowable housing types such as single family, detached, duplexes, townhomes, etc. 伫For each “mixed use” category, define an expected share of individual land uses and identify the permitted density range for residential uses. For example, Mixed Use Downtown might have an expectation of 30% commercial, 40% office, and 30% residential with a density of 10-15 units per acre. 伫Acknowledge Council-approved master plan boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features by guiding the properties with a land use of “Park” (or your equivalent) on your Future Land Use Map. For Communities within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and Rural Centers: 伫Identify employment locations and provide a measurement of intensity of planned employment. Employment locations are typically the areas guided for commercial, office, industrial and institutional uses. Acceptable measurements of intensity include Floor Area Ratio (FAR), building footprint or impervious coverage. Ranges for measuring intensity are acceptable. ATTACHMENT B Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills For Communities with Special Resources: 伫伫Identify aggregate resources in your community on the Future Land Use Map. 伫See the Special Resources section within the Land Use Plan Element for requirements for Critical Area Plans, Historic Preservation, and others. Density Calculations 伫Identify where forecasted residential growth will happen on your Future Land Use Map. Show expected new development and re-developed areas. 伫Identify what density range is expected for each residential land use in your community. 伫Identify when residential development or redevelopment is anticipated to happen. See the Handbook section on Staged Development and Redevelopment. 伫The average net residential density for your community must be consistent with the density requirements for your community designation. 伫Provide a minimum and maximum value for each residential density range. (Zero is not an acceptable minimum. The maximum value must be a whole number.) 伫Use the lowest allowed residential density from land use ranges in your calculations. For example, a land use that permits a density range of 3-5 units per acre must use 3 units per acre in all density calculations for this land use. This ensures that even at the lowest permitted density, the community will be developing at densities that meet overall density expectations. 伫Focus on areas of change. Show us which planned land uses have changed from your previously approved plan and where new land uses (change or development intensity) is planned/expected. 伫Provide the net developable acreage for each residential land use. It’s OK to exclude wetlands and natural water bodies, public parks and open space, arterial road rights-of-way, and natural resource lands protected by local plans and ordinances (i.e. steep slopes, wetland buffers, tree preservation) from area calculations. Stormwater ponds, utility easements, local roads, and local rights-of-way cannot be excluded from area calculations. 伫The information you develop in your land use plan carries over to other elements of your comprehensive plan. The areas and densities in the land use plan must be consistent across elements related to forecasted growth, wastewater, water, housing, and transportation. For Communities with an Affordable Housing Allocation: 伫Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following options outlined in the Housing Plan Element. Refer to the Projected Housing Need section. Staged Development and Redevelopment 伫Identify potential local infrastructure impacts for each 10-year increment. 伫Demonstrate that the municipality is capable of providing services and facilities that accommodate its planned growth. 伫The staging plan or likely development phasing must be consistent with the volume of anticipated sewer flow identified in your community’s Local Sewer Plan. 伫The staging plan or likely development phasing must support and be consistent with your community’s share of the Region’s Need for Affordable Housing for 2021 - 2030. For Urban Center, Urban, and Suburban Communities: 伫Identify and map the land areas that are available or likely to be available for redevelopment, infill development, or new development in your community. 伫Provide a table of those areas identified that includes future land uses, acreages, density ranges, and total residential units in 10-year increments. Use your professional judgment for estimating the timing of development for areas that are uncertain or do not have plans in process. Natural Resources 伫Describe your community’s goals, intentions, and priorities concerning preservation, conservation, or restoration of natural resources in your community. Special Resource Protection 伫All plans must include a protection element for historic sites. 伫All plans must include policies for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy. Solar access is addressed in depth under the Resilience section. 伫All plans must identify whether or not aggregate resources are available within the community. For communities with aggregate resources, additional requirements apply. Page - 3 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills For Communities with Aggregate Resources: 伫伫Identify aggregate resources in your community on the Future Land Use Map using the Aggregate Resources Inventory. 伫You must address and minimize potential land use conflicts. 伫Identify planning and regulatory measures to ensure that aggregate resources are extracted prior to urbanization of aggregate-rich sites. Page - 4 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills TRANSPORTATION Transportation Analysis Zones 伫伫Include a table allocating forecasted population, household, and employment growth by TAZ for 2020, 2030 and 2040. 伫Describe how you have allocated demographic growth based on your plan’s assumptions for guided future land use (e.g., density, mix of uses, locations for new development, highway/transit access, redevelopment, etc.). 伫When doing your land use planning, accommodate development densities around transit consistent with density expectations established in Chapter 3 of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP). Roadways 伫Describe and map the functional classification of all existing and proposed roads within your community, using the functional classification system described in Appendix D of the TPP and the roadway classification map currently recognized in the region. 伫Maps must reflect the principal arterials adopted as the metropolitan highway system in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP). 伫If a community determines that a change to the A-minor arterial system in the community is warranted, a request should be made to the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) for the change, and TAB’s approval secured, prior to reflecting the new classification in the community’s plan. Check the council’s website or contact Elaine Koutsoukos at 651-602-1717 for more information. 伫Maps should also show the streets classified by the community as major and minor collectors and local streets. Changes to these streets from the function shown on the regional map are at a community’s discretion, and do not need approval from TAB. However, these changes should follow the criteria laid out in Appendix D of the TPP and maintain system continuity. A map or table highlighting any discrepancies between the community’s map and the regional functional classification map previously referenced should be submitted to Council staff so the regional map can be updated. 伫Include the following information for the principal and A-minor arterials: 伫Identify the existing and future number of lanes. 伫Map current traffic volumes, including heavy commercial volumes, which include both ADT and HCADT. 伫Map forecasted 2040 traffic volumes. (This should be done using the Council’s regional model, or another method with approval from Council forecasting staff.) 伫Identify future rights-of-way that need to be preserved. 伫Identify planned improvements to principal arterials as shown in the Current Revenue scenario of the 2040 TPP. 伫Identify any existing or proposed future MnPASS lanes, dedicated busways and bus-only shoulder lanes as shown in Figure 6-6 of the 2040 TPP. 伫For other proposed interchange improvements, follow the Highway Interchange Request Criteria and Review Procedure, which can be found in Appendix F of the 2040 TPP. 伫Incorporate access management guidelines of MnDOT, or those of the county in which your community is located, into your comprehensive plan as well as into your subdivision and zoning ordinances. 伫Describe recommendations from recent corridor studies regarding roadway improvements, changes in land use, and/or access. Transit 伫The region has established Transit Market Areas to guide the types and levels of transit service that are appropriate for efficient and effective services. Transit Market Areas are defined in Appendix G of the 2040 TPP by the demographic and urban design factors that are associated with successful transit service. Identify your community in relationship to your transit market area(s). Describe and map the existing and planned transit infrastructure and services in your community, including those of Metro Transit or other regional transit service providers. Communities should include the identification of the following basic elements of the transit system in their comprehensive plan: 伫Existing transit routes and dial-a-ride services 伫Existing and planned transit stations and transit centers 伫Existing and planned park-and-rides and express bus corridors 伫Existing and planned transit advantages 伫Existing transit support facilities Bicycling and Walking 伫Describe and map the existing and planned on-road and off-road bicycle facilities in your community. 伫Map and describe the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) within your community: 伫Show all Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN corridors and alignments. 伫Show the relationship of the RBTN to the local bicycle network of off-road trails and on-street bikeways including all existing and planned connections. Page - 5 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills 伫伫Include locations of regional employment clusters and activity center nodes (as shown on the RBTN map) and other local activity centers. 伫For Tier 1 and Tier 2 corridors on the RBTN, describe and map the existing or planned bicycle facility alignments that are within the established corridors; the purpose of these corridors is as a placeholder for cities/counties to designate a planned alignment. If there is a planned alignment that would fulfill the intent of the corridor and that lies within and in line with the corridor’s directional orientation that the community would propose to replace the established corridor, map that alignment and denote by indicating it as “proposed for the RBTN.” 伫Analyze and address the need for local bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements to provide connections that remove major physical barriers (i.e., freeways, railroad corridors, rivers and streams) on the regional (RBTN) and local networks. 伫Discuss pedestrian system needs in a manner that responds to your community designation (as described in Thrive MSP 2040) and addresses the needs of your community. Aviation 伫Identify policies and ordinances that protect regional airspace from obstructions. Include how your community will notify the FAA of proposed structures. Freight 伫Identify railways, barge facilities and truck or intermodal freight terminals within the community. 伫Identify other important nodes that may generate freight movement, such as industrial parks and large shopping areas. 伫Map the road network showing volumes of multi-axle trucks (also known as “heavy commercial average annual daily traffic or HCAADT”) for Principal Arterial and A-Minor functional classifications. 伫Identify any local roadway issues or problem areas for goods movement, such as weight-restricted roads or bridges, bridges with insufficient height or width clearances, locations with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines, or intersections with inadequate turning radii. Page - 6 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills WASTEWATER Areas Served by the Regional System 伫伫A table that details the households and employment forecasts in 10-year increments through 2040, based on the Council’s forecasts and any subsequent negotiated modifications. This should be broken down by areas served by the Metropolitan Disposal System, locally owned and operated wastewater treatment systems, and Community and Subsurface sewage treatment systems. The forecasts used in your wastewater plan must be consistent with the forecasts used throughout your plan, including in land use, transportation, and water supply. 伫Your wastewater plan must be designed to support these forecasts and provide any allocation breakdowns between sewered and unsewered service for population, households, and employment. 伫An electronic map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent must also be submitted) that show the following information: 伫Your existing sanitary sewer system identifying lift stations, existing connection points to the metropolitan disposal system, and future connection points. 伫Local sewer service districts by connection point. 伫Intercommunity connections and any proposed changes in government boundaries based on Orderly Annexation Agreements. 伫The location of all private and public wastewater treatment plants in your community. 伫Copy of any intercommunity service agreements entered into with an adjoining community after December 31, 2008; including a map of areas covered by the agreement. 伫A table or tables that contain the following information: 伫Capacity and design flows for existing trunk sewers and lift stations. 伫Assignment of 2040 growth forecasts by Metropolitan interceptor facility. In the absence of this information the Council will make its own assignments for the purpose of system capacity needs determination. 伫Define your community’s goals, policies, and strategies for preventing and reducing excessive inflow and infiltration (I/I) in the local sewer system, including: 伫Define the requirements and standards for minimizing inflow and infiltration and for the disconnection of sump pump, foundation drain, and/or rain leader connections to the sanitary sewer system. 伫Include a copy of or reference to your local ordinance that prohibits the discharge of sump pumps, foundation drains, and/or rain leaders to the sanitary disposal system. 伫Include a copy of or reference to your local ordinance requiring the disconnection of existing foundation drains, sump pumps, and roof leaders from the sanitary sewer system. 伫Include a summary of activities or programs related to I/I source mitigation on private sewer services. 伫Describe the extent, source, and significance of existing I/I problems in your community. 伫Analyze the costs for remediating the I/I issues identified in your community. 伫An implementation plan that contains a program strategy, priorities, scheduling, and financing mechanisms for eliminating and preventing excessive I/I from entering the sanitary sewer system. For communities with new trunk sewer systems that require connections to the Metropolitan Disposal System, you also need to include the following: 伫A table that details the proposed time schedule for the construction of the new trunk sewer system in your community. 伫Describe the type and capacity of the treatment facilities, whether municipally or privately owned. 伫Copies of the associated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) or State Disposal System (SDS) permits. Community and Subsurface Treatment Systems 伫Describe your community’s management program for SSTS to comply with MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapters 7080- 7083). 伫Map the locations of all existing public and private treatment systems, if any, including package treatment plants and group on-site systems. 伫Map the locations of all sub-surface sewage treatment systems. You should also identify the locations of known non- conforming systems or systems with known problems. 伫Describe the conditions under which private, community treatment systems (ex. package treatment plants, community drainfields) would be allowed. Examples of such conditions include: 伫allowable land uses and residential densities 伫installation requirements 伫management requirements 伫local government responsibilities Page - 7 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills SURFACE WATER The items in the Minimum Requirements section below are consistent with the requirements under the new Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410,adopted in July of 2015 and Minn. Stat. 103B.235. Executive Summary, Water Resource Management Related Agreements, and Amendment Process 伫伫Provide an executive summary that includes the highlights of the local water management plan. 伫Describe the water resource management related agreements that have been entered into by your community. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the community may be a party to between itself and watershed management organization(s), adjoining communities, or private parties. 伫Include a section on amendment procedures that defines the process by which amendments may be made. The amendment procedure must be consistent with the amendment procedures in the watershed organization(s) plans that affect your community. Physical Environment and Land Use 伫Describe the existing physical environment and existing land use. You may be able to incorporate data by reference if allowed by the appropriate watershed organization(s) plan. You should be aware that not all watershed plans contain the level of detail needed and in those cases, you will be required to provide this information directly in your local water management plan. 伫Describe the proposed physical environment and future land use. 伫Include a map and/or description of drainage areas that includes path and flow directions of the stormwater runoff in your community. 伫Describe the volumes and rates of flow for those defined drainage areas. Existing and Potential Water Resource-Related Problems 伫Include an assessment of the existing water resource related problems in your community. 伫Include an assessment of the potential water resource related problems in your community. 伫Include a list or map of impaired waters within your community as shown on the most current 303d impaired waters list. Local Implementation Plan/Program 伫Include prioritized nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions to identified problems. 伫Describe the areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance standards or official controls in watershed organization(s) plan. 伫Define the water quality protection methods that would be adequate to meet performance standards or official controls. 伫Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the community from that of the WMO(s) for carrying out implementation components. 伫Describe the official controls and any changes needed to official controls. 伫Include a table briefly describing each component of the implementation program that clearly details the schedule, estimated cost, and funding sources for each component, including annual budget totals. 伫Include a table describing the capital improvement program that sets forth by year, details of each contemplated capital improvement that includes the schedule, estimated cost, and funding source. Page - 8 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills WATER SUPPLY Local Water Supply Plan for Municipal Public Water Suppliers 伫伫If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template.Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). 伫Include extended water demand projections for 2020, 2030, 2040 and ultimate build-out that are consistent with population forecasts in the community’s system statement. Water Conservation & Reuse 伫If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template.Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). Assessing & Protecting Source Water 伫If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template.Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). Sub-Regional Collaboration 伫If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template.Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). Page - 9 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills PARKS AND TRAILS Regional Parks and Trails 伫伫Describe, map, and label the Regional Parks System facilities that are located in your community. 伫Depict existing regional parkland with a land use of “Park” (or your community’s equivalent) on your Existing Land Use map. 伫Acknowledge the Council-approved master plan boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features by guiding the properties with a land use of “Park” (or your community’s equivalent) on your Future Land Use map. Local Parks and Trails 伫Describe and map your existing and proposed local parks, trails, and recreation facilities. 伫Include a capital improvement program for parks and open space facilities as part of your implementation program. Page - 10 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills HOUSING Existing Housing Needs 伫伫Complete an existing housing assessment, including: 伫A table of existing local conditions, including the following information: 伫1. Total number of housing units. 伫2. Number of housing units affordable to households with incomes at or below 30% Area Median Income (AMI), between 31 and 50% AMI, and between 51 and 80% AMI. 伫3. Number of housing units that are owner occupied. 伫4. Number of housing units that are rental. 伫5. Number of single family homes. 伫6. Number of multi-family homes. 伫7. Number of publicly subsidized housing units by the following types: senior housing, housing for people with disabilities, and all other publicly subsidized units. Include expiration dates of affordability requirements when applicable. 伫Number of existing households that are experiencing housing cost burden with incomes at or below 30% Area Median Income (AMI), between 31 -50% AMI, and 51 -80% AMI. A map of owner-occupied housing units identifying their assessed values. At a minimum, differentiate the values above and below $211,500. 伫A narrative analysis of existing housing needs. At a minimum address the components of the existing housing assessment within the local context of your community. Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly identify existing housing needs and priorities for the community. Projected Housing Need 伫Discuss how the land use plan addresses the future housing need for your forecasted growth. For Those Communities With An Affordable Housing Need Allocation: 伫Acknowledge your community’s allocation of the region’s need for affordable housing at three levels of affordability: <30% AMI, 31-50% AMI, and 51-80% AMI. 伫Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following options: 伫Option 1: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of 8 units/acre to support your community’s total allocation of affordable housing need for 2021 – 2030. This option may be best for communities that find it difficult to support densities of 12 units/acre (per Option 2), or prefer simplicity over flexibility in their density minimums. 伫Option 2: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of: 伫12 units/acre to address your community’s allocation of affordable housing need at <50% AMI. This combines your community’s allocation at <30% AMI and 31-50% AMI. 伫6 units/acre to address your community’s allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI. 伫Option 2 may be best for communities that feel they can achieve affordable housing needs at 51-80% AMI with less than 8 units/acre. It also allows the affordable housing need to be addressed with less actual land, as is the case if communities choose to use even higher densities than are required. Furthermore, communities using Option 2 may guide land to meet their allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI using a minimum density range of 3-6 units/acre if they have demonstrated in the last 10 years the application of programs, ordinances, and/or local fiscal devices that led to the development of housing affordable at 51-80% AMI in their community. Examples include: density bonuses for affordable housing unit inclusion, local funding programs such as TIF, etc. Implementation Plan 伫A description of public programs, fiscal devices, and other specific actions that could be used to meet the existing and projected housing needs identified in the housing element. Include in what circumstances and in what sequence they would be used. 伫Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly and directly link identified needs to available tools. Needs are identified within the three levels of affordability, and tools should therefore be addressed within the levels of affordability as well. 伫Plans consistent with Council policy will consider all widely accepted tools to address their housing needs. A list of widely accepted tools is provided, however, this list is not exhaustive. Communities are strongly encouraged to include any additional tools at their disposal when identifying how they will address their housing needs. Page - 11 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills RESILIENCE Energy Infrastructure and Resources 伫伫Local governments in the seven-county metropolitan area are required by state law to include an element in their Plan for protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Page - 12 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS Redevelopment 伫伫Minnesota Statutes § 473.859 Subd. 1 states that local comprehensive plans “shall contain objectives, policies, standards, and programs to guide… redevelopment and preservation for all lands and waters within the jurisdiction of the local governmental unit”. The information provided in this section of the handbook is intended to assist communities as they grapple with the opportunities and challenges associated with development sites that are declining in value, viability, and marketability. Page - 13 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK Print Date: 3/10/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Arden Hills IMPLEMENTATION Implementation 伫伫Describe all public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions that your community will use to implement your plan. 伫Define a timeline as to when actions will be taken to implement each required element of your comprehensive plan. 伫Include a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for transportation, sewers, parks, water supply, and open space facilities. Specify the timing and sequence of major local public investments. 伫The CIP must align with development staging identified in other parts of your plan and include budgets and expenditure schedules. 伫Describe all relevant official controls addressing at least zoning, subdivision, water supply, and private sewer systems. 伫Include a schedule for the preparation, adoption, and administration of needed changes to official controls. 伫Include your local zoning map and zoning category descriptions. Identify what changes are needed to ensure zoning is not in conflict with your new land use plan and consistent with regional system plans and policies. 伫Review and update official controls within 9 months of adopting your 2040 plan. Official controls must not be in conflict with your updated plan. You must provide copies of all revised official controls to us. 伫The Housing Plan Element has implementation requirements as well. Refer to that section to ensure that implementation requirements for the Housing Action Plan are met. City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Requests for Proposals 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 2 I. Introduction Arden Hills is a community situated in Ramsey County approximately 8 miles north of the downtown areas of both Minneapolis and St. Paul. The City has an estimated population of 9,600 and over 12,000 employees. The City is home to Boston Scientific, Land O’Lakes, Bethel University and University of Northwestern. Arden Hills offers convenient freeway access to I-35W, I-694, Highway 51/Snelling, and Highway 10. Residents of Arden Hills enjoy a high quality of life with access to neighborhood and regional parks and trails, stable residential neighborhoods, and one of the highest ranking school districts in the State. Arden Hill is home to the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP), which was in production from 1942 to 1976. In 2013, Ramsey County purchased a 427-acre parcel of the site from the U.S. Government to clean up and return to productive economic use. The City of Arden Hills approved a master redevelopment plan for the property in 2015, and completed an update to its 2030 Comprehensive Plan at that time. The redevelopment plan calls for a mix of commercial and residential uses around a town center area. The Joint Development Authority overseeing the project has selected a team comprised of Alatus LLC, Inland Development Partners, and Tradition Development Corporation to help guide overall residential and commercial development on the site. II. Scope of Services The City of Arden Hills is accepting proposals from qualified consultant firms to assist in updating its 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The City completed an extensive update to its Comprehensive Plan in 2015 to incorporate the master redevelopment plan for the TCAAP property. The City’s goal with this current update is to improve upon the existing plan only where needed. A. Metropolitan Council Requirements The consultant firm is expected to develop and maintain effective relationships with the Metropolitan Council, including early identification of issues and communications with the agency throughout the Comprehensive Plan Update process. The consultant firm will be responsible for assuring the Comprehensive Plan Update complies with Minnesota Statutes and the Metropolitan Council guidelines, including the relevant requirements contained in the Local Planning Handbook and the System Statements. B. Comprehensive Plan Chapters The consultant firm shall analyze recent trends in physical development in the City, complete an assessment of this information, and update the existing chapters in the Comprehensive Plan based on current and projected demographic data. The specific chapters to be updated are listed below. The City reserves the right to have City staff assist the consultant firm in providing content for certain chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. The consultant firm will be responsible for incorporating content provided by City staff into the Comprehensive Plan to ensure a consistent format. 3 1. Introduction • Evaluate and update the City Vision as appropriate • Analyze and update Community Profile based on most current U.S. Census data 2. Land Use • Forecasts and Community Designation • Existing Land Use • Future Land Use • Density Calculations • Staged Development and Redevelopment • Natural Resources • Protection Element: Solar, Wind, etc. • Special Resource Protection 3. Transportation • Transportation Analysis Zones • Roadways • Transit • Bicycle and Walking • Aviation • Freight 4. Water Resources • Wastewater Management Plan a. Analyze existing Wastewater Management Plan and complete updates as needed to meet all requirements listed by the Metropolitan Council. • Surface Water Management Plan a. Analyze existing Surface Water Management Plan and complete updates as needed to meet all requirements listed by the Metropolitan Council and the Rice Creek Watershed District. • Water Supply Plan a. Update the existing Water Supply Plan to meet all requirements listed by the Metropolitan Council, and complete and submit the DNR/Metropolitan Council water supply plan template through MPARS. 5. Parks and Trails • Regional Parks and Trails • Local Parks and Trails 6. Housing • Existing Housing Needs • Projected Housing Needs including the affordable housing allocation • Implementation Plan 7. Implementation 4 • Prepare Implementation Plan C. Public Engagement The consultant firm shall provide for public participation in the process. Examples of possible involvement include: public hearings, open houses, and other means of technology used for public input such as online surveys, social media, or a dedicated project website. III. Required Proposal Content A. Project Approach The proposal should reflect the consultant firm’s understanding of the requirements of the project and address how the scope of work is to be accomplished, including the process and the product. The approach should discuss the roles of the City Council, Commissions, Committees, staff, and the public in preparing the Comprehensive Plan Update. B. Project Personnel The proposal should contain the names of the firm’s assigned personnel with key responsibilities for the work and the description of their roles and duties. An organizational chart should be included that designates responsibilities and lines of authority and communication. The proposal should also include resumes of these individuals with an emphasis on their involvements and responsibilities with other comprehensive plan updates. C. Relative Experience The proposal should discuss the firm’s experience with other comprehensive plan updates in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. Relative experience should include current knowledge of and recent experience with the Metropolitan Council and the comprehensive plan update approval process. D. References Include a list of municipal clients where related services were provided by the firm’s proposed staff along with contact information for a staff member at that municipality. Include a list of private clients for whom work has been or is being performed within the City of Arden Hills, the type of project, the specific activities performed, and the name of a person who may be contacted at the private firm. E. Schedule Provide a proposed schedule from project initiation to final completion. The schedule should include a list of key tasks within each phase, key milestones and approximate dates, and deliverables. 5 F. Costs The proposal should include a “not to exceed” cost for the project and a schedule of billing rates for personnel involved. If multiple consultants are collaborating on the project, please identify the specific segment of the scope for each assigned consultant and the associated pricing. Costs should be separately provided for completing each of the Comprehensive Plan sections included in the Scope of Services above. The City reserves the right to select one or multiple consultants. IV. Submission Requirements A. Inquiries All responses, questions, and correspondence should be directed to Matthew Bachler, Senior Planner for the City of Arden Hills. In the interest of fairness to all respondents, please do not contact other staff or elected or appointed official unless instructed to do so. Matthew Bachler City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Email: mbachler@cityofardenhills.org Phone: (651) 792-7822 B. Proposal Submittal One electronic copy in Adobe PDF format and five paper copies of the proposal shall be submitted to the address above. The submission deadline is 4:00 p.m. (CDT) on ______ __, 2017. C. Timeline The anticipated time is outline below. Dates may be subject to change as deemed necessary by the City. Issuance of Request for Proposal………………… Proposals Due……………………………………. Review of Proposals……………………………... Invitation of Selected Consultants to Interview….. Interviews……………………………………….... Recommendations to City Council……………….. Negotiation and Finalization of Contract………… Commencement of Contract……………………… Anticipated Completion…………………………... Metropolitan Council Submission Deadline……… 6 V. Selection of Consultant A. Process and Schedule Based upon its review of the submitted proposals, a selected number of consultants will be asked to interview with City staff. The City staff will recommend one or more of these consultants to the City Council for final selection. B. Cost Liability The City of Arden Hills assumes no responsibility or liability for costs incurred by the consultant prior to signing a contract for this project. Total liability of the City of Arden Hills is limited to the terms and conditions of this agreement. C. Rights of Review Issuance of this RFP does not compel the City to award a contract. The City reserves the right to reject any or all of the proposals wholly or in part and to waive any technicalities, informalities, or irregularities in any proposal at its sole option and discretion. The City reserves the right to request clarification or additional information. The City reserves the right to award a contract, re-solicit proposals, or temporarily or permanently abandon the procurement. D. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be independently evaluated by the Selection Committee. The following criteria will be used to determine which proposal best meets the need of the City: • Conciseness, clarity, and organization of the proposal • Relevance and suitability of the project approach • Qualifications and expertise of the key personnel to be assigned to the project • Experience of firm, other sub-consultants, and project team with comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan updates • Working knowledge and recent experience with the Metropolitan Council • Demonstrated ability to perform the comprehensive plan update in a timely and cost effective manner • Demonstrated familiarity with relevant development, social, and economic issues impacting communities such as Arden Hills • Project costs • Ability to work as a team with the City Council, Commissions, Committees, staff, and other City consultants 7 • Ability to interact positively and effectively with the general public • Innovation and creativity VI. Contract Terms and Conditions A. Upon selection of a consultant firm(s), an Agreement or Contract of Services shall be entered into by the City and the consultant(s). It is expected that the contract will provide for compensation for actual work completed on a not to exceed basis with the following conditions: • Deletion of specific components, such as individual project meetings, will be at the discretion of the City. Payment or reimbursement shall be made based on actual hours worked on various tasks required for the project. • The City shall retain ownership of all documents, plans, maps, reports, and data prepared under this proposal. The consultant shall provide the City with hard copy and digital documents throughout the project and a fully electronic file upon completion of the project. B. The City reserves the right to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contract to be executed. Should the City and a consultant be unable to mutually agree upon the entire contract, the City reserves the right to discontinue negotiations, select another consultant, or reject all of the proposals. Upon completion of negotiations agreeable to the City and consultant (s), a contract shall be executed. Table of Contents Firm Overview .......................................................................................1 Project Understanding ...........................................................................4 Project Approach to Scope of Work .......................................................5 Project Personnel ................................................................................14 Relative Experience / References .......................................................15 Schedule ..............................................................................................19 Costs ...................................................................................................20 Contact: Eric Zweber, AICP (763) 762-2937 EZweber@wsbeng.com 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 · Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: (763) 541-4800 · Fax: (763) 541-1700 · wsbeng.com Revised Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills | March 8, 2017 ATTACHMENT D Firm Overview / 1 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills ·Asset Management Systems ·Aviation Engineering ·Community Planning ·Construction Administration ·Design-Build ·Economic Development ·Energy ·Environmental Compliance ·Environmental Planning and Natural Resources ·Geographic Information Systems ·Geotechnical Engineering ·Intelligent Transportation Systems ·Land Development ·Landscape Architecture ·Management Analysis and Development ·Municipal Engineering ·Pavement Management/ Forensics ·Project Controls ·Project Funding Assistance ·Right of Way ·Site Validation/Certification ·Structural Engineering ·Surveying ·Transportation/Traffic Engineering ·Water Resources Planning and Engineering ·Water/Wastewater Engineering Early in their careers, the founders of WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) recognized that outstanding results are born from outstanding cultures. Since 1995, WSB has remained dedicated to creating a culture of relationship building, forward thinking, and collaboration that enables technically-advanced, thoughtful, and creative engineering and design solutions that build a legacy – your legacy. In 1995, WSB’s services included municipal, transportation, water resources, and traffic. Today, the firm offers services in over 20 areas to seamlessly integrate planning, design and implementation: Firm Overview Firm Overview / 2 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills WSB’s growing staff of nearly 400 includes 23 Principals, 32 Associates, and 85 registered Professional Engineers. In total, WSB has over 125 registered professionals. In the last year, we have welcomed over 80 new staff members to the firm, each joining to support the evolving needs of our government, commercial, and energy clients. With this growth, WSB is able to support the innovation and technical excellence you would expect from a national firm, while maintaining the trusting and meaningful relationships found with a local firm. WSB’s Community Planning and Economic Development Group collaborates with our Transportation, Landscape Architecture, Public Infrastructure and Water Resources Groups to create visionary comprehensive plans with strong technical data to support the policies and implementation tactics. Our multi-disciplinary strategy can deliver your community’s entire comprehensive plan, or our team can work with your existing staff or consultants to develop a collaborative plan that has a common vision and voice. We believe that planners should guide their clients to implementable community and economic development plans. WSB is the leading comprehensive plan consultant for the 2040 Updates, and we have strong experience and relationships with the Metropolitan Council staff. Firm Overview / 3 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Commitment to Continuous Improvement Successful innovation requires continued education and collaboration. WSB University offers employees and clients programs to refine their skills, explore emerging ideas in the industry, and most importantly - collaborate. With a vibrant space specifically designed to encourage innovation through the use of collaborative work areas and access to the latest technology, WSB University leads the industry in employee and client education. While originally intended to act as a support system for innovation, WSB University has, as a result, become an innovative program. A few of our past classes/events that are available to both clients and WSB employees are listed below. Past Events ·Securing Grants for Water/Natural Resource Projects ·Engaging MS4 Audiences ·Ethical Engineers & Mentors ·Revisiting Ethics for the Design Professional Upcoming Events ·Erosion Control Training ·Women in Engineering Professional Development Series ·GIS Tech Forum ·Floodplan & Shoreland Management Training WSB Culture WSB team members embody a set of staff-developed principles called the WSB Way. This defines the firm’s culture and value system, as well as the manner in which we serve each other and our clients. The values that challenge employees to strive for include: over-the-top customer service, integrity, and technical excellence. A Top Workplace Employee satisfaction is a key component to WSB’s culture. Staff members are empowered to make decisions and are given the resources they need to reach their full potential. As a result, the Star Tribune has named WSB a Top Workplace in Minnesota since 2013. This award recognizes progressive companies in Minnesota based on employee opinions regarding organizational health, job expectations, and management. WSB takes this honor very seriously and strives to create an environment where employees feel challenged, excited, and appreciated. The firm has also been recognized for a number of project awards, listed as a Zweig Hot Firm, and has seen an upward trend in ENR’s Top 500 Design Firms - ranked at #441 in 2013, and #288 in 2015. Project Understanding / 4 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills The WSB team understands that the City of Arden Hills is unique in its history, location, assets, character, and challenges. Arden Hills is a largely developed second-ring suburb, and its future planning efforts not only would examine the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) site, but must also focus on creative and sustainable redevelopment of underutilized sites. Any future new development would enhance the existing city character. Arden Hills’s unique location with the major regional interchange of I 35W and I 694, along with its proximity to both Downtown Minneapolis and Downtown St. Paul, is a great incentive for development. Project Understanding While fostering an environment for growth and redevelopment, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan must also ensure the preservation of the amenities that make Arden Hills a great place to live. For example, the Plan must further the goal of maintaining safe and well connected neighborhoods. It must link land use and demographic trends to provide tools to create housing for people in all stages of their life cycle. It must focus uses and density in a way that fosters convenient, safe, and flexible transportation options. Overall, Arden Hills’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan must provide balanced strategies for growth, redevelopment, and connections in response to changing demographics. Implementation actions must also be concise and include techniques for appropriate design of growth and redevelopment. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 5 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Metropolitan Council Requirements First and foremost, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan must meet all requirements for Metropolitan Council’s approval. The WSB team will ensure that all of the required tasks, analyses, figures and tables required in the Metropolitan Council’s checklist are complete, for the Metropolitan Council’s seamless approval. WSB planners are intimately familiar with the Metropolitan Council’s processes and requirements, having completed (or are in process of completing) several Comprehensive Plans within the region. Project Approach to Scope of Work Our Integrated Design Approach (IDA), or “studio” approach, to design and planning is interdisciplinary and includes a team of professionals with innovative ideas and solutions. We seek to add value to projects by integrating the aesthetic eye of landscape architects, the market understanding and business knowledge of economic development professionals, and the engineering expertise required to ensure that the project not only looks good on a sheet of paper, but can actually be built within the commercial, industrial and housing market. This IDA helps gain a consensus more efficiently, reduces the uncertainty and skepticism encountered in the planning process, and encourages innovative methods and design viewpoints. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 6 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan Chapters The WSB team understands that different levels of staff involvement are anticipated depending on the chapter of the Plan and the level of revision needed. At the outset of the process, WSB will meet with City staff to determine the level of revision needed. All chapters, whether completed by WSB, City Staff, or other consultants, will be integrated into a cohesive whole. Introduction This chapter will be updated to present an overview of what is included in this 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update and to reflect changes in planning history since the last update was completed. Community Profile WSB planners will work with City Staff to update the Community Profile chapter to reflect physical development and demographic changes since the last Comprehensive Plan was completed. Current demographics, housing and economic data will be provided, along with population projections, to help inform readers about other chapters of the Plan. City Vision The WSB team understands that significant work has been done on developing the City Vision and its ten (10) companion Goals for Arden Hills. The Vision and Goals will be used to make discussions within the other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) Property The City has updated the TCAAP chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, along with the Regulating Plan and the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC), in December 2016. Because it was recently updated, WSB will not spend significant resources on the TCAAP chapter. TCAAP Project Approach to Scope of Work / 7 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Land Use WSB has developed an iterative and responsive process for land use planning. Our team will begin with a review of the existing residential conditions. The commercial and industrial conditions will be analyzed during the High Education Study, which will be conducted by WSB concurrently with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. WSB’s experience as municipal planners, municipal engineers and private land development professionals allows us to develop land use analysis that is accurate, realistic and implementable. Our team will evaluate properties that are available for development, including vacant and underutilized sites that may be ripe for transitioning to other uses. This task will include identification of parcels that have inappropriate land use designations in the existing Comprehensive Plan, as well as an evaluation of land use category descriptions in general, to determine if new categories are needed. Finally, the Land Use chapter will include the development of goals and objectives that will define the livability, vibrancy, resiliency, and equity for the City. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 8 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Transportation WSB & Associates will prepare a transportation plan for the City of Arden Hills consistent with Metropolitan Council’s Local Planning Handbook requirements. Existing Arden Hills transportation plan content will be utilized as much as possible, with outdated information updated to bring this plan into compliance with Metropolitan Council’s requirements. Agency Involvement: WSB staff will participate in one (1) work session with Ramsey County staff, the MnDOT Area Manager and Arden Hills staff to discuss existing and forecasted transportation issues. Roadway Component, Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and Travel Forecasting: WSB staff will allocate Metropolitan Council’s 2010, 2030, 2030 and 2040 population, employment and housing data by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) based on an approved Arden Hills Land Use Plan. WSB staff will also run the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 regional travel demand to develop a 2040 travel demand forecast for Principal Arterial and A-Minor Arterial roadways. The roadway component will include existing and planned functional classification, and forecasted traffic will be compared to existing roadway capacity to identify any future congestion problems. Other roadway system issues will also be identified and mapped along with proposed strategies for improvement. Existing Ramsey County access management guidelines will be discussed and incorporated as a reference along with any future right-of-way preservation needs. Other Multimodal Components: Other multimodal components will include transit, bicycle and walking, aviation and freight. The transit and bicycle/walking components will discuss existing and planned conditions, system gaps and associated strategies for improvement. The freight component will include field collection of heavy commercial traffic on Principal Arterial and A-Minor Arterial Roadways, as required by the Metropolitan Council. Existing freight infrastructure, such as railroads, major truck routes and freight generators, will also be mapped and potential strategies for improvement will be identified. Since Arden Hills is not in the influence area of a regional airport, this component of the plan will be brief and an overview of existing policies regarding protection of aviation airspace will be provided. Final Report: WSB staff will prepare a final report of the overall Metropolitan Council compliant 2040 transportation plan, including narrative and associated tables, maps and other exhibits. The final report will include summary findings and recommendations for all transportation modes in table and map format, including project location, implementing agency and applicable transportation goals and objectives addressed by the recommendation. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 9 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Water Resources Wastewater Management Plan The existing Wastewater Management Plan will be analyzed and updated as needed to comply with the Metropolitan Council’s requirements. The updated Plan will rely on information from the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan to maximize efficiency and minimize cost. The tasks that will be completed in this update include the following: ·A review of previously completed projects in order to account for previous sanitary sewer service planning efforts. ·An update to the previously completed capacity analysis based on revised land use assumptions. ·An identification of goals and implementation steps for the sanitary sewer plan, including loading requirements and needed improvements. ·The preparation of GIS maps of the existing system, needed infrastructure and pipe size ranges, and the proposed future system. ·Detailed management strategies to address inflow and infiltration from public and private sources. Water Supply Plan The previous and current Water Supply Plans will be analyzed and summarized in an accessible format that complies with the Metropolitan Council’s requirements. The updated Plan will rely on information from the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan to maximize efficiency and minimize cost. This proposal assumes that the City will have already completed, begun or contracted the work for a Department of Natural Resources Water Supply Plan separately. The Water Supply Plan is a large portion of the Water Supply component of the Comprehensive Plan. The tasks that will be completed in this update include the following: ·Review of the City’s existing Water Supply Plan. ·An update of the City’s existing water distribution system model. ·Calibration of the updated model. ·Improvement upon the City’s Water Supply Plan by expanding on water supply issues and natural resource impacts, elaborating on monitoring and conservation programs, and addressing the Metropolitan Council’s water management goals, as outlined in the City’s System Statement. Should the TCAAP water supply model be unusable for the entire City, an add-on service is proposed to create a WaterCAD V8i model. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 10 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Surface Water Management Plan The existing Surface Water Management Plan will be analyzed and updated as needed to comply with the requirements of the Metropolitan Council and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The updated Plan will rely on information from the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan to maximize efficiency and minimize cost. The tasks that will be completed in this update include the following: ·Coordinate with City Staff and Reviewing Agencies. This task includes providing project management for the plan update and coordination with the City. A project kick-off meeting with City staff and communication with agencies will facilitate collection of needed information. ·Understand the City’s Current Surface Water Management Plan. This task consists of gathering relevant water resources-related information for the City related to TMDL or WRAPS studies, soils information, climate and precipitation data, and floodplain maps, to name a few. The water resource data collected will be analyzed, interpreted, and summarized in the Plan to provide an indication of the present status and possible trends concerning surface water resources within the City, and to assist in the development of surface water management policies. ·Identify Problems and Corrective Actions. Water resource management problems identified within the City during the public input and data collection process will be outlined, and corrective actions for each problem will be developed. ·Establish Goal Setting, Policies, and Priorities. Based on the results of the previous tasks and associated analysis, goals and policies for the management of water resources in the City will be included. It is assumed that the majority of the goals and policies included in the previous plan will not change. WSB will generate additional goals and policies to comply with regulatory updates in coordination with City staff. ·Develop the Implementation Plan. Through the Plan development process, a number of water resource studies, programs, and capital improvements will be identified either through the inclusion of goals and policies or through addressing problems with corrective actions. These programs, studies, and capital improvements will be prioritized with City staff and Council and developed into a clear implementation plan. ·Develop the Draft and Final Plan. This task focuses on the preparation of the plan document. The Plan will be formatted as one comprehensive set of goals, policies, and implementation priorities. A preliminary draft of the Plan will be prepared and reviewed with City staff prior to submitting to the Watershed District and Metropolitan Council for review. After their review, the final LSWMP will be prepared and submitted to the City Council for review and approval. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 11 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Parks and Trails WSB understands that each community consists of multiple perspectives for the future vision of the City’s Park System. Our team will work collaboratively with City staff, the City Council, the PTRC (Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee), and other engaged citizens to bring a fresh perspective to this aspect of the comprehensive plan. This will ensure the views of each group are received, understood, and assessed prior to making any recommendations. Through the engagement process summarized above, input will be received and evaluated. Our professional expertise and knowledge through previous park planning for other peer communities will result in sound recommendations associated with the Park and Trails for the City’s consideration. Recommendations will also reflect requirements that meet or exceed those currently specified by the Metropolitan Council. This will include, but not be limited to, describing, mapping, and labeling all regional, state, and federal recreational lands within the community, as well as any Council-approved future master plan boundaries of such properties. A similar process will be completed for all existing City-owned parks and trails. Housing Arden Hills has a long success rate with single family home development and has seen recent success with multi-family and senior housing. Our team will coordinate with the Planning Commission and City staff to develop a housing element that meets the Metropolitan Council’s requirements for growth and affordable housing. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 12 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Implementation and Capital Improvement Plan WSB is committed to developing actionable implementation plans with all of the Comprehensive Plans we do. Because we are municipal planners, we understand what it takes to bring plans to fruition and the level of specificity required by staff. Funding Opportunities The WSB team will also include funding opportunities within the Implementation chapter of the Plan. Arden Hills may be eligible for Livable Communities, Brownfield and other grants to assist with the implementation of the Plan. At WSB, we believe that it is our responsibility to bring funding opportunities to the cities we serve. As such, we have developed a dedicated grant and funding committee comprised of WSB staff members from our various service areas. These specialists will be able to discover new funding opportunities for the City. They will also prepare any funding applications the City would like to pursue. WSB staff has assisted our clients with grant/funding applications resulting in almost $30 million in financial assistance in 2016. We are highly experienced and successful in preparing applications for the following funding sources: Metropolitan Council LCDA Grants, MnDNR Trail Grants, Legacy Partnerships, SRTS Funding, MnDOT HSIP, LRIP, BSWR Clean Water Funds, Watershed District Grants, MDH Funding, Public Facilities Authority (PFA) Loans, DEED, CIMS Grants, AAA Funding for Pedestrian Safety Improvements, USDA Rural Development Grants and Loans, and State Revolving Loans. As a value-added service, WSB offers an annual funding analysis for client cities to address the needs of their top priorities. WSB does not charge for this service. Public Engagement An effective public engagement strategy begins with an assessment of the stakeholders and the project itself to determine the most appropriate level of engagement. WSB’s assessment takes into account factors such as: ·Potential impacts of the project on the community; ·Potential for the community engagement to impact the final product; ·The level of public participation desired by decision-makers; ·Complexity of the project; ·Expected level of controversy; ·Benefits of engaging the public; ·The degree of involvement desired by the public. To accomplish an effective Involve level of engagement, WSB is offering the following: 1. Formal interactions at City Hall. 2. The use of mySidewalk to provide a website and portal to encourage a 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week and 365-days-a-year engagement opportunity. 3. Required Public Hearing. Project Approach to Scope of Work / 13 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Role of the City Council, Commissions, Staff The following schedule clarifies the roles of the City Council, Commissions, Committees, staff, and the public in preparing the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 mySidewalk City Council Kick-Off Land Use and Housing Draft Comprehensive Plan Approval Planning Commission Land Use and Housing Implementation and CIP Draft Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Economic Development Commission Draft Comprehensive Plan Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Draft Parks and Trails Chapter Additional Information - Technology WSB utilizes technology to supplement the planning process and increase efficiencies wherever possible. The following list contains tools that we have incorporated in other projects and that we are proposing to use for the Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update: ·mySidewalk (project website, online surveys and dialogue) ·Social media ·Datalink (GIS data) ·ESRI Business Analyst (economic development data) ·Mentimeter (real-time surveys, feedback, and audience engagement) Project Personnel / 14 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Eric Zweber, AICP Project Manager Eric is a senior planner and land use specialist at WSB. He has 15 years of experience working directly with residents, business, agencies, and other stakeholders on a variety of plans, programs, and projects. Eric has direct experience in single and multiple family housing, commercial, industrial, institutional, and mixed-use developments. He has experience working for a number of communities in Minnesota, including Arden Hills, Rosemount, Victoria and Wayzata, as well as for communities in Oregon and Wisconsin. He has a deep understanding of development and land use and takes a proactive approach to finding design solutions that meet the community’s goals and the existing market forces. Bill Alms, PE Surface Water Engineer Bill Alms is a Project Engineer in WSB & Associates Water Resources Group. He has five years of experience in in the field of water resources engineering. Bill’s experience includes planning, design, and construction management for a number of regional BMP projects, including passive treatment technologies, chemical treatment systems, and stormwater reuse applications. He is also involved with research and inspection of residential and municipal storm water sites, hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality modeling, watershed permitting submittals, and development plan reviews. Project Personnel PROJECT MANAGER Eric Zweber, AICP CITY ENGINEER WATER / WASTEWATER SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT / NATURAL RESOURCES PARKS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE TRANSPORTATION Sue Polka, PE Erin Heydinger, EIT Bill Alms, PEJason Amberg, RLA Scott Mareck, AICP Relative Experience / References / 15 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Jason L. Amberg, RLA, ASLA Landscape Architect Jason is a principal of the firm and leads WSB’s Landscape Architecture group. He has extensive experience with a variety of project types, including parks and trails, campgrounds, waterfronts, urban design, and other natural resource based projects. In his 20+ year career, Jason has established himself as a leader in all aspects of the park and trail planning and design process from inception of project statements to development review after projects are implemented. He has conducted presentations on park and trail planning and design topics at professional conferences such as the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association, the Minnesota America Planning Association, and as a guest speaker at Concordia University. Erin Heydinger, EIT Water/Wastewater Specialist Erin is a Graduate Engineer in WSB’s Water/Wastewater Group and brings several years of field and research experience. She transitioned into the field of environmental engineering after working in environmental science and ecology. She has a Master’s degree in Environmental Engineering and Science through Johns Hopkins University. Erin’s experience includes water reuse projects, water systems modeling, wellhead protection planning and implementation, and stormwater management and permitting. Prior to joining WSB, she was involved in several projects in the Colorado Rockies and central Florida and worked in both the public and private sector. Erin’s expertise includes water distribution systems, reuse, and integrated water management. Scott Mareck, AICP Transportation Planner Scott Mareck is an AICP planner with more than 23 years of transportation planning experience. He has led or been involved with a wide array of transportation elements, including numerous City, County, State and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) transportation plans, corridor studies, and bicycle and pedestrian plans. Scott also is an expert in local government inter-jurisdictional coordination at both a system planning and project implementation level and is well known for his knowledge of state and federal transportation funding strategies. He is adept at bringing diverse constituencies together and working through challenging project issues to implement transportation planning visions. Scott brings a big picture regional perspective and strong project management skills to every project. Sue Polka, PE City Engineer/Public Works Director Sue has more than 30 years of industry experience, as both Director of Public Works and City Engineer, for communities in Minnesota, Arizona, and Texas. She has developed Comprehensive Plan updates for the Cities of Mendota Heights, MN and Avondale, AZ. Sue has been serving as interim Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer for the City of Arden Hills since September 2016. Relative Experience / Relative Experience / References / 16 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills City of Roseville WSB was hired by the City of Roseville to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Roseville is a nearly built-out first ring suburb located adjacent to both Minneapolis and St. Paul, with a 2014 population of 35,319. The focus of the upcoming Comprehensive Plan in Roseville is redevelopment, economic development, and to provide a wide spectrum of life cycle housing opportunities. WSB has been hired to complete the Land Use, Housing, Parks, Resilience and Implementation, and to work with City staff on the required infrastructure elements. In addition, WSB will be completing an Economic Development Strategic Plan, which has been identified as a priority to position the City for sustainable future growth. The most important component is a robust community engagement plan, to engage as many people as often as possible throughout the process. Innovative strategies under development for Roseville include a dedicated project website, pop-up engagement to reach people during existing community meetings and events, work through the Early Childhood and Family Education Program, and specific outreach to typically underrepresented communities through the City’s Human Rights Commission. Municipal Clients References Jesse Freihammer City Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director 2660 Civic Center Drive Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: (651) 792-7042 Email: jesse.freihammer@cityofroseville.com Roseville, MN Relative Experience / References / 17 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills City of Mahtomedi, MN WSB assisted in the completion of a major update to the City of Mahtomedi’s Comprehensive Plan in collaboration with City staff and Sanders Wacker Bergly, Inc., Kelsey Johnson’s former employer during the Plan Update. The Plan identifies where the City has been, where the City is now, and where the City seems to be heading. It provides goals, objectives, policies, and plans to guide the City in getting to where it wants to be. The Comprehensive Plan brought together various elements of Mahtomedi into a comprehensive “big picture” plan that provides a basic framework to guide other planning efforts in the City and to guide the relationship between the City and the metropolitan region. The City promoted public participation throughout the planning process, which included 14 meetings with a Citizens Advisory Committee that included the Planning Commission and interested members of the City Council and City Staff, two sustainability and Natural Step Framework seminars in association with Sustainability Associates, and one community public open house. The Mahtomedi Comprehensive Plan emphasizes the City’s desire to maintain (and enhance) its “small town” character. Additionally, it emphasizes the City’s desire to become a sustainable community, meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. City of Medina, MN WSB developed the City of Medina’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan with the assistance of City staff and the Planning Commission. WSB completed all Metropolitan Council’s required elements, including affordable housing, land use, transportation, sanitary sewer, water supply, and surface water resource management. WSB conducted draft land use map public meetings at which over 60 residents attended. Stakeholder engagement included pop-up meetings, citizen forums and mySidewalk. Dusty Finke City Planner 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Phone: (763) 473-8846 Email: dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us Scott Neilson City Administrator 600 Stillwater Rd. Mahtomedi, MN 55115 Phone: (651) 426-3344 Email: sneilson@ci.mahtomedi.mn.us ?÷A@ ?÷A@ ?¸A@ ?¸A@ ?ÇA@%&h( %&c( White Bear Lake M a h t o m e d i A v e E a s t A v e Iris St W i l d w o o d R d Hickory St H i l t o n T r l I d e a l A v e Juniper St Briarwood Ave Maple St C e n t u r y A v e W e d g e w o o d D r L i n c o l n t o w n A v e 60th St Q u a i l S t 72nd St Woodland Dr P a r k A v e H a l l a m A v e Long Lake Rd W a r n e r A v e Dunbar Way V i e w R d B e r w i c k L n H a z e l A v e A l l e y 70th St E d i t h A v e Bichner Ln Puma Ln L o r e t t a L n P i n e S t Kale St Salem Pl Ash St I d e a l A v e C e n t u r y A v e 60th St P a r k A v e W a r n e r A v e 0 2,750Feet Ü Mahtomedi Comprehensive Plan Community Designation Map Mahtomedi, MN City Boundary Parcel Boundary Lakes Community Designations Non-Council Area Agricultural Rural Residential Diversified Rural Emerging Suburban Edge Suburban Edge Suburban Urban Urban Center Urban Center - Core City D o c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 8 5 9 - 3 8 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ C o m p P l a n \ C o m m u n i t y D e s i g n a t i o n M a p . m x d Relative Experience / References / 18 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills City of Minnetrista In 2009, WSB and Associates worked with the City of Minnetrista to assist them with an update to their Comprehensive Plan, completing the sanitary sewer, water, transportation, and water resource sections of the Plan. WSB staff served as the City’s project manager for the Comprehensive Plan Update, coordinating community engagement efforts, ensuring compliance with strict Metropolitan Council requirements for density minimums, and coordinating the complicated adjacent jurisdictional review in the City. WSB contributed to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan by using projections and land use scenarios to complete a surface water management plan, a sewer rate study, and a water rate study, which determined rates for all three services within the community. Also, many of the transportation improvements specified in the Plan have come to fruition under the leadership of WSB’s municipal engineering group, serving as a further catalyst for the realization of the land use plans and policies set forth in the plan. Finally, the WSB team members worked to ensure that the zoning districts, standards, and other official controls were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan by updating ordinance language and completing necessary re-zonings. Private Clients within the City of Arden Hills WSB has not performed any work with private clients in Arden Hills, but WSB has provided direct assistance to other cities, including the Cities of Richfield and North St. Paul, to complete Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant applications in 2016. The developer of the grant funded projects for both Cities is Inland Development, a partner of the TCAAP master developer Alatus. Richfield was awarded $1,360,000 and North St. Paul was awarded $600,000 in grant funds. Lake Minnetonka WhaletailLake DutchLake Ox Yoke Lake COUNTY ROAD 26 COUNTY ROAD 15 C O U N T Y R O A D 9 2 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 9 STATE HIGHWAY 7 COUNTY ROAD 151 S T AT E H I G H WAY 7 C O U N T Y R O A D 9 2 COUNTY ROAD 26 COUNTY ROAD 15 COUNTY ROAD 26 C O U N T Y R O A D 9 2 COUNTY ROAD 15 D o c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 1 2 1 - 7 0 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ C o m m u n i t y V i s i o n i n g . m x d Existing State Trails Existing regional trail Regional Parks and Preserves Other Parks and Preserves Minnetrista Boundary Parcel Boundary Ü 0 3,500Feet Mike Barone City Administrator 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, MN 55364 Phone: (952) 446-1660 Email: mbarone@ci.minnetrista.mn.us Schedule / 19 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 mySidewalk City Council Kick-Off Land Use and Housing Draft Comprehensive Plan Approval Planning Commission Land Use and Housing Implementation and CIP Draft Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Economic Development Commission Draft Comprehensive Plan Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Draft Parks and Trails Chapter Schedule The schedule below provides a timeline from project initiation to final completion. Costs / 20 A Proposal to Provide a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Arden Hills Costs Public Engagement and City Meetings $6,800 Background and Demographics $4,800 Housing $5,100 Land Use $8,500 Parks and Trails $6,000 Surface Water Management $22,000 Transportation $16,900 Water Supply $7,000 Wastewater $19,000 Implementation $3,900 Metropolitan Council Coordination $300 Total $100,300 Alternate 1: Water Supply Model $6,000 Each Additional Open House $2,000 Each Additional Council/Commission Meeting $1,250 Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan Budget