Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-10-18 PCAPPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 8, 2017 Planning Commission Regular Meeting 11 -08 -17PC.PDF PLANNING CASES Planning Case 17 -027 –Variance –3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Planning Case 17 -028 –Site Plan Review –1504 Edgewater Avenue (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Planning Case 17 -029 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Vacation Of Easement – 3685 New Brighton Road (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS Draft 2018 Work Plan MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council 01 -10 -18 - REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.PDF Planning Commission Comments Staff Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair: Roberta Thompson Commissioners: Matt Dixon Nick Gehrig Steven Jones James Lambeth Clayton Zimmerman Brent Bartel (Alternate) Angela Hames (Alternate) Vacant Council Liaison: Steve Scott Planning Commission January 10, 2018 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. Agenda CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 2.A. Documents: 3. 3.A. Documents: 3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. 5.C. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESNovember 8, 2017 Planning Commission Regular Meeting 11 -08 -17PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 17 -027 –Variance –3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Planning Case 17 -028 –Site Plan Review –1504 Edgewater Avenue (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Planning Case 17 -029 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Vacation Of Easement – 3685 New Brighton Road (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS Draft 2018 Work Plan MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council 01 -10 -18 - REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.PDF Planning Commission Comments Staff Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Roberta ThompsonCommissioners:Matt DixonNick GehrigSteven JonesJames LambethClayton ZimmermanBrent Bartel (Alternate)Angela Hames (Alternate)VacantCouncil Liaison:Steve Scott Planning CommissionJanuary 10, 2018 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents: 3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. 5.C. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESNovember 8, 2017 Planning Commission Regular Meeting 11 -08 -17PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 17 -027 –Variance –3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFPlanning Case 17 -028 –Site Plan Review –1504 Edgewater Avenue (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFPlanning Case 17 -029 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Vacation Of Easement –3685 New Brighton Road (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFUNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESSDraft 2018 Work Plan MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFCOMMENTS AND REPORTSReport From The City Council 01 -10 -18 - REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.PDFPlanning Commission Comments Staff CommentsADJOURNMENTADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Roberta ThompsonCommissioners:Matt DixonNick GehrigSteven JonesJames LambethClayton ZimmermanBrent Bartel (Alternate)Angela Hames (Alternate)VacantCouncil Liaison:Steve Scott Planning CommissionJanuary 10, 2018 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents:3.B.Documents:3.C.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.5.C.6. Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2017 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Vice Chair Steven Jones called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Vice Chair Steven Jones, Commissioners Brent Bartel, Nick Gehrig, Phillip Neururer, and Clayton Zimmerman. Absent: Chair Roberta Thompson, Commissioners Matt Dixon, Angela Hames and James Lambeth. Also present were: Senior Planner Matthew Bachler and Eric Zweber, WSB & Associates. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – NOVEMBER 8, 2017 Vice Chair Jones stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 6, 2017 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Gehrig, to approve the September 6, 2017, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 17-024; Planned Unit Development Amendment – Arden Square – 1160 County Road E West – Public Hearing Senior Planner Bachler stated the subject property was first developed as a ski and golf shop in the early 1970s. In 1992, the City approved a Site Plan for modifications to accommodate a new bank user. These plans included the removal of a portion of the west side of the building to put in five drive-up lanes under the building roof. Today, the 4,500-square foot space that was occupied by ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 2 TCF Bank is vacant and the roof over the drive-up lanes has been removed. American Red Cross is the one tenant in the building and occupies approximately 5,000 square feet. Senior Planner Bachler commented in 2016, the City approved a Master and Final PUD for modifications to the drive lanes and parking lot, a new monument sign and trash enclosure, and enhanced landscaping (Planning Case 16-003). At this time, the property owner also completed renovations to the front building façade, including the removal the mansard and gable roof on the west side of the building, increasing window and brick masonry coverage, and adding awnings and decorative lighting. Senior Planner Bachler explained as part of the approval for Planning Case 16-003, Arden Square was required to submit a PUD Amendment application with proposed site modifications for a fast food restaurant to use the existing drive-thru lane. This requirement was put in place to ensure that traffic circulation and design concerns could be addressed before a business occupied the tenant space. Senior Planner Bachler reported Arden Square is currently working with a Dunn Brothers Coffee franchisee to open a coffee shop in the vacant 4,500 square foot tenant space in the building. Several site modifications are needed to add a drive-thru lane on the west side of the building for Dunn Brothers. A parking lot island on the north side of the site would be shifted east and new curb would be installed to create a drive-thru stacking area for up to seven vehicles. The existing drive lane on the west side of the parking lot would be converted to one-way only and the parking stalls in this area would be restriped as diagonal stalls. Drive-thru traffic could exit at the southwest corner to the adjacent Arden Plaza retail center, or circulate around the south and east side of the building. Additional improvements would include a patio seating area outside of the Dunn Brothers tenant space. Senior Planner Bachler indicated new wall signage is proposed for the north and south building walls. The wall sign on the north façade would be 43.5 square feet in area and the sign on the south façade would be 90.4 square feet. Dunn Brothers would use the existing multi-tenant sign on County Road E for freestanding signage. Site Data Land Use Plan: Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Commercial Zoning: B-2: General Business District Current Lot Sizes: 48,000 square feet Topography: Relatively flat Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the surrounding area and the Plan Evaluation. Senior Planner Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The property at 1160 County Road E West is located in the B-2 - General Business Zoning District and in Sign District 4. 2. The City approved a Master and Final Planned Unit Development in Planning Case 16- 003 permitting the property owner to complete modifications to the existing parking lot and other site improvements. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 3 3. The Master and Final PUD Agreement between the City and Arden Square, LLC approved in Planning Case 16-003 requires a PUD Amendment if the vacant tenant space is proposed to be occupied by a fast food restaurant to review proposed site modifications. 4. The proposed PUD Amendment includes modifications to the property’s drive lanes and parking spaces in order to accommodate the drive-thru lane for the fast food restaurant and for new wall signage. 5. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District that outlines future development principals for the area. 6. The City has adopted Design Standards for the B-2 District within the Zoning Code. 7. The proposed PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City Code. The applicant has requested flexibility for the minimum number of stacking spaces required for a fast food restaurant and for the wall signage copy area. 8. The proposed PUD Amendment is in conformance with the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. 9. The proposed PUD Amendment is in conformance with the Arden Hills 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 10. The additional sign copy area requested for wall signage satisfies the Sign Standard Adjustment criteria included in Section 1260.01 of the City Code. 11. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City’s Zoning Code, flexibility has been requested by the applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 12. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. Senior Planner Bachler stated based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 17-024 for a PUD Amendment at 1160 County Road E West. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-024, staff is recommending the following seven (7) conditions of approval: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 2. The Developer shall obtain the required development permits within one year of the approval date or the approval shall expire, unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval’s expiration date. Extension requests must be submitted in writing to the City at least 45 days prior to the expiration date. 3. A PUD Amendment Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Agreement shall be executed prior to the issuance of any development permits. 4. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, City Planner, and Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of a Grading and Erosion Control Permit or other development permits. 5. A Sign Permit shall be required for each wall sign and the menu ordering board. 6. The relocated parking lot island shall be replanted to include a minimum of one (1) tree. 7. The Developer shall provide a total of 8.5 caliper inches of new tree plantings on the site. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 4 Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Vice Chair Jones opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Bartel expressed concern with the location of the drive-thru. He asked if an easement would be needed for the drive-thru given its proposed location. Senior Planner Bachler stated there was an opening at the southwest corner of the site which was a curb cut into Arden Plaza. He reported there was an agreement in place to allow for this access. He commented further on how traffic would flow through the property and explained that signs and pavement striping would be used to assist in directing traffic. Vice Chair Jones asked where the main entrance to the American Red Cross building was located. He requested further information on the location of the ADA stalls. Senior Planner Bachler explained this entrance was on the north side of the building. He then reviewed the location of the ADA stalls within the parking lot. Andrew Commers, Arden Square representative, stated his family has owned Arden Square for the past 30 years. He thanked staff for the thorough report on this matter. He commented on the proposed amendments to the PUD and requested the Commissioners off their support in order to allow for a perspective new tenant, Dunn Brothers Coffee, to move into this space. He noted the American Red Cross was supportive of the new tenant. Vice Chair Jones opened the public hearing at 6:58 p.m. Vice Chair Jones invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. Gretta Dvorak, Dunn Brothers Coffee representative, stated she had her husband were hoping to open and develop a business that was a part of the community. She believed this location would be a great gathering space that could flourish in Arden Hills. Joe Commers, owner of Arden Plaza, stated he loved the City of Arden Hills. He thanked the City for supporting his efforts over the years and requested their continued support going into the future. Luke Hemkin, eStreet Flats resident, 1201 County Road E, explained he and his wife lived across the street from the potential coffee shop and he would love to see this development occur. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 5 Beka Hemkin, eStreet Flats resident, 1201 County Road E, indicated she attended Bethel University and now works at Northwestern. She believed the proposed Dunn Brothers would be a great addition to the community. There being no additional comment Vice Chair Jones closed the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. Commissioner Bartel agreed the coffee shop would be a great addition to this area of Arden Hills. Commissioner Bartel moved and Commissioner Gehrig seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-024 for a PUD Amendment at 1160 County Road E West, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the seven (7) conditions in the November 8, 2017, Report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Eric Zweber, WSB & Associates, stated on June 7, 2017, WSB & Associates provided a summary of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update to the Planning Commission. That summary included the changes in the requirements for the Housing Chapter. Since that meeting WSB and City staff have been updating the Housing and Land Use chapters and completing the technical elements (potable water, surface water, sanitary sewer, and transportation) to develop any capital investments necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, in September, the City Council accepted the Commercial, Industrial, and Higher Education study. The findings of that study have been included in the Land Use and Implementation chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. He reviewed in detail the draft Land Use, Housing, and Implementation Chapters, commenting on the existing and new affordable housing needs. He provided further comment on the implementation portion of the Comp Plan noting how this aligned with the City’s CIP. The next steps and approval timeline for the Comp Plan was reviewed and staff requested comments or questions. Commissioner Zimmerman commented on how the City worked to balance affordable housing with the cost for these units and potential buyers. He questioned if subsidies were set up to account for some level of variability. Mr. Zweber reported the City was only able to control regulations for development and the funds available to assist with development. He explained that the labor market and cost for building materials were a matter outside of the City’s control. He stated if the cost to produce housing were on the rise and incomes were to remain the same, the State and Federal government would have to assist in filling that gap. He described how the Met Council worked to assist local communities to ensure they have the proper tools in place to foster affordable housing. Commissioner Zimmerman stated he did not want the City and Alatus to be put in a position to create affordable housing on TCAAP if there was not a strong market to occupy the space. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 6 Mr. Zweber commented further on the policies the City had in place to assist with affordable housing development. He described how affordable housing required a great deal more interaction between several levels of government when compared to market rate housing. Vice Chair Jones asked if Met Council had new affordable housing requirements for the entire metro area. Mr. Zweber explained the Met Council had requirements for each urban, suburban and emerging suburb in the metro area. He reported the Met Council did not have a one size fits all standard regarding affordable housing. Senior Planner Bachler commented on how the City would be working to ensure a variety of housing products would be constructed on TCAAP. He explained the City had the proper regulations in place to assist in meeting this goal. Commissioner Bartel questioned what would happen to Arden Hills if they did not meet the Met Council’s housing goals. Mr. Zweber stated the Met Council had yearly check-ins and would be monitoring the City’s efforts. He indicated there could be many reasons why a City does not achieve its goal such as lack of experienced developers or proper funding sources. COMMENTS AND REPORTS A. Report from the City Council Senior Planner Bachler updated the Planning Commission on City Council activities from the September 25, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting, stating the City Council approved Planning Case 17-023 for a Master and Final Planned Unit Development for the redevelopment of 3920 Northwoods Drive for a Marriott Springhill Suites hotel. This planning case was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 6, 2017 and received a recommendation for approval. The developer is expecting to demolish the existing office building on the property this year and begin construction on the hotel in 2018. Senior Planner Bachler explained the City Council approved Planning Case 17-020 for the Zoning Code amendments and property rezoning related to higher education land uses. The City Council approved the creation of a new Institutional Zoning District and permitted the higher education campus use only in this district. The Bethel University and University of Northwestern main campuses were rezoned to Institutional District. Senior Planner Bachler reported the State of the City was held this year on September 28 at the Tavern Grill restaurant and on October 3 at City Hall. Councilmembers presented on the TCAAP redevelopment project, local transportation and development projects, and parks and trails. A representative from the Minnesota Department of Transportation provided information on road improvement projects scheduled for 2018 and 2019. The Tavern Grill event was attended by approximately 50 people. The City Hall event was attended by approximately 20 people. In comparison, the 2016 State of the City morning event at Flaherty’s Arden Bowl was attended by approximately 70 people. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 8, 2017 7 B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests None. C. Staff Comments None. ADJOURN Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Gehrig, to adjourn the November 8, 2017, Planning Commission Meeting at 7:58 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2018 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-027 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Tim Bredow Property Location: 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard Request: Variance Requested Action The applicant has requested a variance in order to allow an accessory structure that was previously moved on to the property to remain in place. The accessory structure requires a variance from both of the side yard setback requirements. Background 1. Overview of Request The property at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard is located in the R-2 District on the west side of Lake Johanna. The property has frontage on Lake Johanna Boulevard, but is accessed from the alley off of Fairview Avenue. The applicant previously moved a detached garage from the adjacent property at 3417 Lake Johanna Boulevard on to the property without a Building Permit. The structure was placed on a concrete apron in front of the existing detached garage on the property. The two structures are separated by approximately three feet. The City typically requires a minimum of six feet of separation between structures, or if that separation is not met that certain fire protection improvements are completed. The property also has an existing small storage shed located in the southwest corner of the lot. Residential lots are not permitted more than two accessory structures and the applicant has agreed to remove the shed if the variance is approved. The applicant has applied for a variance in order to allow the detached garage to remain in place. A variance is needed in this case because the garage encroaches on the 10-foot side yard setback City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 2 of 7 requirement on both sides of the lot. In its current location, the garage is setback 2.55 feet from the north property line and 7.96 feet from the south property line. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing each of the variance criteria (Attachment A). The existing property survey is included in Attachment D. 2. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Single Family Detached Residential Zoning: R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Lot Size: 9,254 square feet Topography: Property slopes down approximately 30 feet from Fairview Avenue to Lake Johanna Boulevard 3. Surrounding Area Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential South Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential East Water (Lake Johanna) Water (Lake Johanna) Water (Lake Johanna) West Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential Plan Evaluation 1. R-2 Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Accessory Structure A. Lot Size and Dimensions The property extends from Fairview Avenue on the west to Lake Johanna on the east. Lake Johanna Boulevard is located between the dwelling and the lakeshore. Based on the survey, there does not appear to be dedicated public right- of-way for Lake Johanna Boulevard. The survey indicates the right-of-way width for Lake Johanna Boulevard would be 66 feet. The City Attorney has advised in the past when evaluating lot area in these situations, the approximate area that would be within the Lake Johanna Boulevard right-of- way should be subtracted from the total lot area. Using this calculation, the lot area of the subject property is 9,254 square feet. The minimum lot area in the R-2 District is 11,000 square feet. Applicable R-2 Lot Requirements 1. Minimum Lot Area (sf.) 11,000 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft., width/depth) 85/120 3. Height (ft.) 35 4. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.3 5. Lot Covered by Structure 25% 6. Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 7. Minimum Building Setbacks (ft) Front Yard 40 Rear Yard (Principle) 30 Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 Side Yard Interior - Principal (Minimum/total both yards on lot) 5/15 Side Yard Interior - Accessory 10 Side Yard Corner 40 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 3 of 7 The width of the lot is approximately 38.4 feet as measured at the 40-foot front yard setback from Lake Johanna Boulevard. The average depth of the lot between the east and west property lines is 258.9 feet. The minimum width requirement in the R-2 District is 85 feet and the minimum depth requirement is 120 feet. B. Structure Setback A variance is needed to allow the detached garage to encroach 7.45 feet into the minimum side yard setback of 10 feet on the north side of the lot, creating a setback of 2.55 feet. A variance is also needed to allow the structure to encroach 2.04 feet into the 10-foot side yard setback on the south side of the lot, creating a setback of 7.96 feet. The new garage was placed over an existing concrete surface and would not result in an increase in impervious surface coverage. The Zoning Code defines a through lot as a property that has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two substantially parallel streets. The subject property is a through lot because it abuts the alley off of Fairview Avenue and Lake Johanna Boulevard. Section 1325.03, Subd. 1 (C) of the Zoning Code states that for through lots, the administrator may determine that one of the front yards may be deemed a rear yard and shall determine appropriate rear yard setback requirements. Factors to be considered include topography, location of structures on the lot, location of structures on adjacent lots, and the types of streets abutting the lot. Based on the orientation of the dwelling on the property, staff determined that the Lake Johanna Boulevard frontage should be treated as the front yard and the alley frontage as the rear yard. Staff determined that the accessory structure should meet the minimum setback requirement of 30 feet for principal structures. The new garage would be approximately 63 feet from the Fairview Avenue property line. C. Structure Height The maximum height shall not exceed 15 feet in height or the height of the principal structure to which it is accessory, whichever is lower. The principal structure on the property is greater than 15 feet in height, and the new garage is less than 15 feet in height. D. Structure Size Accessory structures associated with residential uses cannot exceed 728 square feet in floor area. The new garage has a footprint of approximately 20.3 feet by 22.2 feet, or 452 square feet. No more than two accessory structures are permitted on a lot primarily used for residential uses. There is one additional detached garage and a small storage shed on the property. If the variance is approved, the property owner would be required to remove the storage shed so that there are only two accessory structures on the lot. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 4 of 7 E. Exterior Finish The exterior finish of accessory structures is required to be compatible in appearance and material used with the principal structure on the property. The principal dwelling and existing detached garage have a tan exterior finish. The new detached garage has a dark grey exterior finish. As a recommended condition of approval, the applicant would be required to paint the new garage so that it is more compatible with the principal structure. F. Lot Coverage The maximum structure coverage permitted in he R-2 District is 25 percent and the minimum landscape lot area is 65 percent. As proposed, the structure coverage on the lot would be 22.3 percent and the landscape lot area would be 56.8 percent. The proposal would not result in a reduction in landscape lot area as the garage is located on an existing impervious surface. The existing landscape lot area is considered to be nonconforming. Lot Coverage Proposed R-2 Regulations Square Feet Percent Structure Coverage 2,067 22.34% Maximum 25% Driveway 1,127 12.18% Sidewalks & Steps 803 8.68% Total Impervious Coverage 3,997 43.20% Maximum 35% Landscape Area 5,257 56.80% Minimum 65% Lot Size 9,254 - 2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements The proposed garage is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. 3. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. The applicant would be required to obtain a Building Permit for the new garage and complete all improvements necessary to bring the structure into compliance with the Building Code. City Engineer The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 5 of 7 Discussion Staff is supportive of the variance request for several reasons. The lot was created prior to the current R-2 District zoning requirements and is unusually narrow as compared to other properties in this neighborhood. The structure is an average sized two-car garage and it would be impossible for a structure of this size to meet the minimum side setback requirements given the dimensions of the lot. If the lot was conforming, a variance would likely not be needed. Additionally, the setbacks of the new garage are generally consistent with the adjacent garage on the property. This garage is also setback 2.55 feet from the north side lot line and approximately 9 feet from the south side lot line. Staff does have concerns about the structure having been moved on to the property without a Building Permit and its close proximity to the adjacent detached garage. As a recommended condition of approval, the applicant would be required to obtain a Building Permit and complete all fire protection and other improvements to the garage required to bring it into compliance with the Building Code. This may include foundation improvements since the garage currently sits on a concrete slab that may not be an adequate foundation for a structure of this size. Findings of Fact Staff offers the following findings of fact for review: General Findings: 1. The property at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard is located in the R-2 Single & Two Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The lot is a legal nonconforming lot within the R-2 District. 3. The applicant previously moved a second detached garage on to the property. 4. The accessory structure encroaches 7.45 feet into the required side yard setback from the north property line and encroaches 2.04 feet into the required side yard setback from the south property line. The minimum interior side yard setback for accessory structures in the R-2 District is 10 feet. 5. The impervious surface coverage on the lot exceeds the maximum of 35 percent permitted in the R-2 District; however, this was preexisting and is not being increased with this request. 6. The exterior finish of accessory structures is required to be compatible in appearance and material used with the principal structure on the property. 7. All other aspects of the proposed construction are in conformance with the Zoning Code requirements for the R-2 District. 8. The proposed accessory structure would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. Variance Findings: 9. The variance would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City Code. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 6 of 7 10. The variance would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan because it meets the City’s housing goal of encouraging property investment. 11. The proposed accessory structure is a reasonable use of the property that would not be allowed under the rules of the Zoning Code without the requested variances. 12. The property is unique and presents development challenges because of it is unusually narrow. 13. The unique characteristics of the property were not created by the property owners. 14. The proposed structure would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 15. The requested variance does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 17-027 for a Variance at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-027, staff is recommending the following five (5) conditions of approval: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The applicant shall obtain a Building Permit and complete all fire protection and other improvements to the new garage required to bring the structure into compliance with the Building Code. 3. The applicant shall paint the new garage so that it is compatible with the appearance of the principal structure. 4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 5. The small shed on the property shall be removed from the property within sixty (60) days of the Building Permit being closed. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-027 for two variances at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the five (5) conditions in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17- 027 for two variances at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-027 - 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard - Variance\Memos_Reports_17-027 Page 7 of 7 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 17-027 for two variances at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 17-027 for two variances at 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice and Public Comments Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property. Staff received a phone call from the neighbor to the south of the property at 3407 Lake Johanna Boulevard who expressed concerns about the proposed setbacks, the impact of the new structure on stormwater runoff, and that the garage may not meet Building Code requirements. Staff also received a phone call from the property owner at 1831 Noble Road who stated they opposed the request. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 25, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by December 24, 2017 (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. The applicant was notified on December 13, 2017 of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by February 22, 2018. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application and Variance Request Letter B. Location and Aerial Maps C. Site Photos D. Existing Conditions Survey Thanks for allowing me to apply for a property variance. I will address the criteria that is used to review a variance application for the city of Arden Hills · Purpose and Intent. The Variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the provisions of City's Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. · Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. · Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. · Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. · Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a practical difficulty. My responses: The purpose of the new garage will be to park my car and my wife’s car. I have taken over the “old” garage with my wood working hobby equipment, and there has not been room to pull the vehicles inside The use of the new garage will be reasonable for the neighborhood as several homes now have multiple car garages. Our lot is very narrow and long which allows me to meet all of the requirements of the city except the setbacks from the north and south property lines. The “new” garage will be the same distance from these property lines as the “old “ garage. It seems to fit in nicely on the cement pad that has already in place for a number of years. It cannot be seen from the front of the house and is tucked in quite a distance from the back alley. The variances I am requesting are as follows · Setback of 2.5 feet from north side property line (minimum setback of 10 feet required) · Setback of 8 feet from south side property line (minimum setback of 10 feet required) · 3 accessory structures (no more than 2 accessory structures are permitted on a property in a residential district) Tim and Kate Bredow 3415 Lake Johanna Blvd. Arden Hills, MN This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 100.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet100.0050.00 Notes Enter Map Description Legend City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 100.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet100.0050.00 Notes Enter Map Description Legend City Halls Schools Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Recreational Centers Parcel Points Parcel Boundaries View of new garage looking east View of new garage from Fairview Avenue View of dwelling looking east towards lake View of storage shed looking south 3415 Lake Johanna Boulevard Site Photos City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2018 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-028 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Carrie Martinson Property Location: 1504 Edgewater Avenue Request: Site Plan Review Requested Action The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review in order to keep an existing 64 square foot accessory storage shed in the front yard of the property located at 1504 Edgewater Avenue. Background 1. Overview of Request The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review in order to keep an existing 8-foot by 8-foot, or 64 square foot, accessory storage shed recently installed at 1504 Edgewater Avenue. The City does not require property owners to obtain a permit for accessory structures less than 120 square feet in size and no permit was issued for the shed. The shed is located in front of the single- family dwelling on the property between Edgewater Avenue and the home. The shed is setback approximately 42 feet from the front property line along Edgewater Avenue and 55 feet from the secondary front property line on Ridgewood Road. The Zoning Code prohibits the placement of accessory structures on non-lakeshore lots between a public street and a dwelling. The shed is currently used to store a riding lawnmower, snow blower, and other yard tools. The applicant notes that the one-stall garage does not provide adequate space to store this equipment and that the shed was placed in the front yard due to a steep slope along the eastern and southern sides of the property that presents safety concerns for using a riding lawnmower. There is one additional accessory structure located on the eastern side of the property between the dwelling and Ridgewood Road. Based on historic aerial imagery, it appears this structure has City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 2 of 6 been in place since at least 2003. The City has no records of a permit being issued for this shed. This shed is located within the secondary front yard along Ridgewood Road is considered to be a legal non-conforming structure. 2. Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential R-1: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential South Low Density Residential R-1: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential East Park and Open Space Park and Open Space City Park West Low Density Residential R-1: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential 3. Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Single-Family Detached Residential Zoning: R-1 – Single Family Residential Lot Size: 20,473 square feet (0.47 acres) Topography: The property has a fair amount of grade change as the lot slopes from the southwest corner to the east and the north. Plan Evaluation 1. Section 1320.06 – R-1 District Requirements A. Lot Size and Dimensions – Meets Requirements The property dimensions are approximately 102 feet wide by 200 feet deep. The total lot area is 20,473 square feet. B. Structure Setbacks – Site Plan Approval Required Section 1325.01, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code states that accessory structures shall not be located nearer the front lot line than the front yard setback line for the principal structure to which it is accessory. Section 1325.01, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Code allows the City Council to approve a deviation from this location requirement when exceptional and unusual Applicable R-1 Lot Requirements 1. Minimum Lot Area (sf.) 14,000 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft., width/depth) 95/130 3. Height (ft.) 35 4. Lot Covered by Structure 25% 5. Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 6. Minimum Building Setbacks (ft) Front Yard 40 Rear Yard (Principle) 30 Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 Side Yard Interior - Principal (Minimum/total both yards on lot) 10/25 Side Yard Interior - Accessory 10 Side Yard Corner 40 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 3 of 6 circumstances exist on the property through the Site Plan Review process. In this case, the property is a corner lot with frontage on Edgewater Avenue and Ridgewood Road. The Edgewater Avenue side of the property is considered to be the principal front yard and Ridgewood Road side is considered the secondary front yard. Accessory structures on the property are required to be located behind the front façade of the principal structure on both the Edgewater Avenue and Ridgewood Road sides of the property. The minimum side and rear yard setback for accessory structures in the R-1 District is 10 feet. The existing accessory structure is located in front of the single-family dwelling within the principal front yard. The structure is setback approximately 42 feet from the Edgewater Avenue property line and 55 feet from the Ridgewood Road property line. The setback from the west side lot line is approximately 25 feet. C. Lot Coverage – Meets Requirements The maximum structure coverage permitted in the R-1 District is 25 percent. The existing structure coverage on the lot is approximately 12.6 percent. Properties in the R-1 District are required to have a landscape lot area of 65 percent. The property currently has a landscape lot area of approximately 75.4 percent. 2. Section 1325.01 – Accessory Structures A. Structure Height – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code limits the height of accessory structures in the R-1 District to 15 feet or the height of the principal structure to which it is accessory, whichever is less. The existing shed is approximately 8 feet in height. B. Structure Size – Meets Requirements Accessory structures associated with residential uses cannot exceed 728 square feet in floor area. The existing shed measures 8 feet by 8 feet, or 64 square feet in total floor area. No more than two accessory structures shall be permitted on a lot primarily used for residential uses. There is one additional small shed located on the east side of the property. No additional accessory structures would be permitted on the lot unless existing structures are removed. Additional Review City Engineer and Building Official The City Engineer and City Building Official have reviewed the request and do not have any additional comments at this time. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 4 of 6 Findings of Fact Staff offers the following findings of fact for consideration: 1. The property at 1504 Edgewater Avenue is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The lot is 20,473 square feet in size with approximate dimensions of 102 feet in width by 200 feet in depth. 3. The property currently consists of a single family dwelling with an attached garage and two accessory structures. 4. The property owner recently installed a new accessory storage shed in the front yard of the property measuring 64 square feet in size with dimensions of 8 feet by 8 feet. 5. Section 1325.01, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Code states that accessory structures shall not be located nearer the front lot line than the front yard setback line for the principal structure to which it is accessory. 6. Section 1325.01, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Code allows the City Council to approve a deviation from the accessory structure location requirement when exceptional and unusual circumstances exist on the property through the Site Plan Review process. 7. The accessory storage shed is setback approximately 42 feet from the font property line along Edgewater Avenue and approximately 55 feet from the secondary front property line along Ridgewood Road. 8. The existing conditions on the property meet the minimum lot coverage requirements for properties located in the R-1 Zoning District. 9. The accessory storage shed does not exceed the height limit of 15 feet for accessory structures. 10. Detached accessory structures up to 728 square feet are permitted structures in the R-1 Zoning District. 11. Properties used primarily for residential uses are permitted up to two accessory structures. There is one additional shed located on the property for a total of two accessory structures. 12. The accessory storage shed is located outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. Discussion The Zoning Code states that deviations from the location requirements for accessory structures may be permitted after Planning Commission review and City Council approval of a site plan with documentation showing the exceptional and unusual circumstances justifying the proposed deviation. In evaluating this request, the Planning Commission should consider whether there are circumstances that are exceptional and unique to the property at 1504 Edgewater Avenue that justify the proposed deviation. Staff has identified the following topics that the Planning Commission may wish to consider in evaluating this case: City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 5 of 6 Topography The aerial map of the property provided in Attachment B includes contour lines illustrating the topography of the property. The principal structure is situated close to the southwest corner at the high point of the property, which has an elevation of approximately 904 feet. The property slopes away from the dwelling to approximately between 886 and 888 feet along Ridgewood Road and Edgewater Avenue. Based on the topographical data, the steepest areas of the property appear to be along the eastern side of the property adjacent to the dwelling and in the southeast corner. The topography of the property limits the locations where an accessory structure could be located behind the front façades of the dwelling and on flat ground. The property owner notes in their application that it would be potentially dangerous to place the shed in the rear yard because the steep slope makes it difficult to back a lawnmower in and out of the shed. Location of Principal Structure Since the property is a corner lot, accessory structures must be located behind the front façades of the home along Edgewater Avenue and Ridgewood Road. The dwelling is setback approximately 105 feet from the Edgewater Avenue property line and approximately 30 feet from the Ridgewood Road property line. The remaining rear yard area where an accessory structure could be placed and meet side and rear setback requirements is approximately 30 feet by 55 feet in size. Neighborhood Appearance One of the main reasons the Zoning Code prohibits the placement of accessory structures between residential dwellings and a public street is to maintain a neighborhood characteristic of open front yard areas free of structures. The storage shed in the front yard is visible from adjacent properties and vehicles driving on Edgewater Avenue and Ridgewood Road. Staff has received emails from four residents in the neighborhood expressing their concerns about the visual impacts of the shed in its current location (Attachment E). Proposed Motion Language The findings of fact provided do not directly support a recommendation for approval or denial. The Planning Commission will need to provide additional findings that support the reason for recommending approval or denial of this case. Staff would note that the Planning Commission may choose to place conditions on a recommendation to approve as well. 1. Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1504 Edgewater Avenue, based on the findings of fact in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission, and the following additional findings of fact: findings to recommend approval should specifically reference the unique and exceptional circumstances on the property that justify a deviation from the accessory structure location requirements. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-028 - 1504 Edgewater Ave - Site Plan Review - Accessory Structure\Memos_Reports_17-028 Page 6 of 6 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 17-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1504 Edgewater Avenue, based on the findings of fact in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission, and the following additional findings of fact: findings to recommend denial should specifically reference why a deviation from the accessory structure location requirements is not justified in this case. 3. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 17-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1504 Edgewater Avenue for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments Although a public hearing is not required for a Site Plan Review application, notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Staff has received comments from the property owners at 3201 Ridgewood Road and 1505, 1535, and 1557 Edgewater Avenue expressing their opposition to the request. Copies of the correspondences can be found in Attachment E. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 6, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City was required to act on this request by January 5, 2018 (60 days), unless the City provided the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The applicant was notified on December 13, 2017 of the City’s request for an additional 60-day review period. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must now act on this request by March 6, 2018. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Site and Aerial Maps C. Site Photographs D. Site Plan E. Public Comments This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS 400.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet400.00200.00 1504 Edgewater Avenue 2,4001: This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS 100.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet100.0050.00 1504 Edgewater Avenue 6001: 1504 Edgewater Avenue View of rear yard from southeast corner of lot View of rear yard from southwest corner of lot View existing shed and secondary front yard from southeast corners of lot 1504 Edgewater Avenue View of storage shed located in principal front yard View of storage shed from Ridgewood Road View of storage shed from Edgewater Avenue From:Dixon To:Matthew Bachler Subject:Arden Hills Planning Commission Public a Meeting Notice - Carrie Martinson Date:Friday, November 24, 2017 2:40:22 PM Dear Mr Bachler, Thank you for asking our opinion about the Site Plan Review for the existing storage shed at 1504 Edgewater Avenue. Because the Zoning Code for Arden Hills "does not permit detached accessory structures between the dwelling and street", I am not sure why this is even a question. I believe that the purpose for Zoning Codes is to set building Rules that are to be followed within the City. Anyway, the main reason as to why I think this shed should be immediately removed is that it sets a bad precedent for the neighborhood. If this structure is allowed to stay, what is to keep others from putting up a front yard storage shed, a garage, a lean to, an out door toilet, a basketball hoop next to a street, etc? Again, thank you for the interest that you have in our opinion. Very sincerely yours, Dixon and Janis Jordan 1505 Edgewater Avenue, 651-633-1134 From:Kathryn Reyerson To:Matthew Bachler; Kathryn Reyerson Subject:Martinson Site Plan Review - PC# 17-028 Date:Sunday, November 26, 2017 1:56:38 PM Dear Mathew Bachler, I am writing in response to the notice of a public meeting on the Martinson Site Plan Review. The request is to keep a storage shed in the front yard of 1504 Edgewater Avenue. The City Zoning Code clearly prohibits the placement of detached accessory structures between the house and the street on non-lakeshore lots. I urge the City of Arden Hills to enforce the zoning code and require the removal of this storage shed. To do otherwise would set an unfortunate precedent for Edgewater Avenue and our neighborhood. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1991 and have always admired the aesthetics of the area. I hope the Planning Commission will assist us in maintaining the high standards of our neighborhood. Thank you for seeking the input of neighbors. Sincerely yours, Kathryn Reyerson Kathryn Reyerson 3201 Ridgewood Road Arden Hills MN 55112 From:Fred Sutter To:Matthew Bachler Subject:1504 Edgewater Avenue Shed Date:Wednesday, December 06, 2017 4:27:21 PM   Mathew,   Regarding the request for a shed in the front yard at 1504 Edgewater Avenue, we would like to let you know that we seriously object to this structure.    If this variance is granted, what prevents anyone else in the neighborhood from putting a similar or larger structure in their front yard.    I believe the current code is appropriate and should be enforced.    The homeowners backyard is an appropriate location for this structure.     In addition, the homeowner also has a structure on the east side of the property.   How many structures like this are allowed?   FYI.I have lived in this neighborhood since 1991, and owned the property at 1504 from 1991 to 1999.   I have been approached by a number of neighbors that are upset by what has been going on in the front yard of this property.   Fred & Anne Sutter (651-600-4791 1535 Edgewater Avenue     From:Pam Ford To:Matthew Bachler Subject:PC#17-028 site plan review Date:Tuesday, December 26, 2017 3:16:15 PM Project PC# 17-028 Site plan review Carrie Martinson 1504 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 To Matthew Bachelor Senior Planner We received notice of the above site review pertaining to a plastic storage shed in the front yard of our neighbor. We do not feel it is acceptable to have this in anyone’s front yard and it is against zoning codes. We do not want this to be approved. We would like the shed to be removed. Thank you for the notice and your consideration, Pam and Dennis Ford 1557 Edgewater Ave. Arden Hills, Mn. 55112 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 1 of 14 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2018 PC Agenda Item 3.C TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-029 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Richard Kotoski/Timothy Horita Property Location: 3685 New Brighton Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement Requested Action The applicant has requested a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat in order to subdivide the existing lot located at 3685 New Brighton Road into three lots for single-family residential dwellings. A Vacation of Easement is also being requested in order to vacate a portion of the public utility easement for the City lift station on the property. The City Council is required to hold the public hearing for the Vacation of Easement request. Background The City approved a Final Plat for the Burroughs Lane subdivision in Planning Case #06-038, which was comprised of a four lot subdivision including 3685 New Brighton Road and the property to the immediate north, 3695 New Brighton Road. The Final Plat was approved in 2007, but was never recorded with Ramsey County and has since expired. Since that time, 3695 New Brighton Road has been redeveloped for a single-family residential dwelling. The current subdivision plan is only comprised of the property at 3685 New Brighton Road. 1. Overview of Request The existing property at 3685 New Brighton Road is approximately 1.9 acres in size and is comprised of a single-family residential dwelling, detached garage, and shed. The dwelling and accessory structures are located towards the eastern side of the property and the one access driveway for the lot is on New Brighton Road near the intersection with Thom Drive. The City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 2 of 14 property as approximately 124 feet on frontage on New Brighton Road and 378 feet of frontage along Thom Drive. The existing topography of the lot generally slopes west from New Brighton Road to a wetland complex located on the western parcel boundary. This wetland complex covers approximately 0.3 acres of the property and extends off the property to the north and south. The City has a sanitary lift station located on the southern edge of the property approximately in the middle of the lot. The remainder of the lot is heavily wooded. The applicant has proposed a subdivision of the existing property to create three lots for single- family residential dwellings. The existing dwelling and other improvements would be retained and located on the proposed Lot 3. Two new lots (Lot 1 and Lot 2) would be located to the west of Lot 3 with frontage and driveways on Thom Drive. The existing access driveway for Lot 3 would be located to Thom Drive so that all three parcels are similarly oriented with their principal frontage on Thom Drive. There is a purchase agreement in place for the easterly lot (Lot 2) and the applicant expects construction to begin on this lot immediately if City approval is received. The westerly lot (Lot 1) is being marketed for sale. In order to support the proposed development, a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement is requested. The easement vacation is needed to vacate a portion of the public utility easement for the City lift station on the property. The development is required to meet Rice Creek Watershed District regulations and the proposed grading plan shows that two basins would be constructed on Lot 1 to capture stormwater runoff from the site and allow it to discharge into the adjacent wetland. Lot 1 and Lot 2 would be graded to direct water flow from these properties to one of the two basins. The site is heavily wooded with 72 significant trees. A Tree Preservation Plan has been provided indicating 22 of these trees would be removed. Replacement tree plantings are proposed as part of the Tree Preservation Plan. The applicant has submitted a development plan set (Attachment C), Final Plat (Attachment D), and proposed easement vacation plan (Attachment E). 2. Surrounding Area: Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential South Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential East Park and Open Space Park and Open Space Park and Open Space West Low Density Residential R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 3 of 14 3. Site Data: Future Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Single-Family Detached Residential Zoning: R-2: Single & Two Family Residential Lot Size: 83,253 square feet (1.91 acres) Topography: Property slopes east to west approximately 28 feet from New Brighton Road to the wetland complex on the western boundary. Plan Review 1. Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations Review A. Street Plan and Streets No new streets would be constructed for the Horita Acres subdivision. All three lots will have access on Thom Drive. The existing property has an access driveway on New Brighton Road. As a condition of approval, the driveway will be required to be relocated to Thom Drive. New Brighton Road is a Ramsey County roadway and the County has reviewed and approved the access relocation. All other requirements pertaining to driveway location and grades are met by the proposed plans. B. Easements City subdivision regulations require a 12-foot wide utility and drainage easements dedicated to the City along the right-of-way and centered on common lot lines. The Preliminary and Final Plats include 12-foot utility and drainage easements centered on the common lots lines throughout the development and a 12-foot easement along the Thom Drive and New Brighton Road right-of-way, and along the shared lot line with the property to the north. The Public Works Director/City Engineer has commented that the drainage easement to the north of the building site on Lot 2 will need to be widened from 10 feet to 12 feet. This will need to be revised on the Final Plat before the plat is signed by the City. The property is traversed by a wetland area along the western boundary of the lot that extends off site to the north and south. In order to satisfy Rice Creek Watershed District requirements, the development will be required to construct two basins on Lot 1 that will capture stormwater runoff from the entire site and allow water to discharge into the adjacent wetland area. The Subdivision Code requires that a drainage easement be provided for wetland areas and stormwater management facilities. The plat provides adequate easements for the wetland, but the Final Plat will need to be revised so that the drainage easements around the two ponding areas are taken to two feet above the emergency overflow elevation of each basin. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 4 of 14 The City has an existing lift station located along the southern property line of the lot along Thom Drive. This lift station is located on private property and the City has an easement that permits the City to operate and maintain the lift station. The existing easement for the lift station is larger in area than the footprint of the facility. The proposal includes a partial vacation of this easement to accommodate the access driveway for Lot 2. The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the new easement area and determined that it provides adequate area for the City to continue to operate and maintain the lift station. The vacation of a public easement requires a public hearing before the City Council. At the time Planning Case 17-029 is reviewed by the City Council, a public hearing will also be held for the proposed vacation. C. Lots Location and Size All lots are required to abut by their full frontage on a public street and meet the minimum lot dimensions required by the Zoning Code. All three lots have full frontage on a public street and meet the minimum standards for the R-2 District. Watercourse Lots abutting upon a wetland are required to have additional width or depth to assure building sites are not subject to flooding. All building areas should be located outside the natural feature and a minimum of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation. Lot 1 abuts a wetland area on the west side of the property. The building pad site is located outside of the delineated wetland area. The lowest level of the proposed dwelling on Lot 1 is 893 feet, and the 100-year high water level for Basin 1 is 888.9 feet and for Basin 2 886.1 feet. Corner Lots Corner lots shall be platted at least 10 feet wider than the minimum requirement for interior lots. The minimum lot width for the R-2 District is 85 feet. Lot 3 is a corner lot and would have a width of 120 feet. Drainage Lots shall be graded so as to provide drainage away from building locations and directed down lot lines within drainage and utility easements. The proposed grading plan satisfies this requirement. D. Park Dedication The Subdivision Code requires developers of subdivisions to dedicate to the public a reasonable percentage of the tract to be developed. Section 1130.08 Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance indicates that for a subdivision that results in new dwelling units of less than two units per acre, the applicant shall dedicate six percent of the buildable land area in the subdivision or pay a park dedication fee of $6,500 per residential unit. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 5 of 14 Six percent of the development site would be 0.11 acres which would not allow for a feasible park area. As a recommended condition of approval, the developer would be required to pay a park dedication fee of $6,500 per new single-family residential lot, for a total fee of $13,000. The applicant has submitted a letter requesting a reduction in the park dedication fee to a total of $6,500 for both lots (Attachment G). Staff would recommend that a decision on the park dedication requirement be deferred to the City Council. E. Required Improvements All other required improvements, including sewer, water, utilities, and driveway connections to Thom Drive will be constructed in accordance with the City Code. 2. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review Section 1320 – District Provisions (R-2 Single & Two Family Residential District) A. Lot Area and Dimensions The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing 1.9 acre property into three single-family residential lots. The westerly lot (Lot 1) would have an area of 42,594 square foot. The central lot (Lot 2) would have an area of 18,936 square feet. The easterly lot with the existing dwelling (Lot 3) would have an area of 21,723 square feet. The minimum lot size for the R-2 District is 11,000 square feet. All three lots would meet the minimum lot area requirement. The Zoning Code requires lots in the R-2 District to have a minimum width of 85 feet measured at the 40-foot front yard setback line, and a depth of 120 feet. Lot 3 is a corner lot and is required to have an additional 10 feet of width for a total width of 95 feet. All three lots meet the minimum dimension requirements for this district. Lot Total Lot Area (Square Feet) Width (Feet) Depth (Feet) R-2 District Minimum 11,000 85 (Lots 1 & 2) 95 (Lot 3) 120 1 42,594 141.6 338 2 18,936 97.8 240 3 21,723 120 124 B. Setbacks The minimum principal structure setbacks in the R-2 District are 40 feet in the front yard, 30 feet in the rear yard, and a 5-foot minimum in the side yard with both side yards required to add up to a total of 15 feet. In addition to the structure setback requirements, no structures could be placed City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 6 of 14 within any of the drainage and utility easements on the lots. Given the wetland and protected drainage areas, a significant area of Lots 1 and 2 could not be built on. The development plans include the approximate building pad areas for Lots 1 and 2. Structure setback distances would be verified at the time Building Permit applications are submitted. Based on the preliminary plans, all setbacks could be met for Lots 1 and 2. The table below provides approximate setback distances based on the preliminary building pad areas. Lot Front Yard (Feet) Rear Yard (Feet) Side Yard (Feet) R-2 District Minimum 40 30 5/15 1 140 83 65 (West)/ 6 (East) 2 88 72 9 (West)/ 6 (East) *All setback distances are approximate. Structure setbacks would be verified at the time a Building Permit application is submitted The existing residential dwelling on Lot 3 includes a deck on the west side of the dwelling that would encroach on the side yard setback and drainage and utility easement on the western side of the property. As a recommended condition of approval, the deck would need to be modified or removed so that it does not encroach into the required setback or the easement area. The accessory structures on Lot 3 and the remaining portion of the dwelling meet the 10-foot setback requirement from the side and rear property lines. Lot Front Yard (Feet) Side Yard Corner (Feet) Rear Yard (Feet) Side Yard (Feet) R-2 District Minimum 40 40 30 5 3 42 60 82 *Deck encroaches over western lot line C. Structure Coverage and Landscape Lot Area The maximum structure coverage permitted in the R-2 District is 25 percent and the minimum landscape lot area is 65 percent. The approximate structure coverage and landscape lot area for Lots 1 and 2 was calculated based on the proposed building pad dimensions and the approximate dimensions of the driveways. The structure coverage and landscape lot area requirements would be verified at the time Building Permit applications are submitted. Based on the submitted plans, all three lots would meet the lot coverage requirements. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 7 of 14 D. Building Height and Density The maximum building height in the R-2 District is 35 feet. Building height would be verified at the time Building Permit applications are submitted. The applicant has provided example front elevation drawings for the dwellings on Lots 1 and 2 (Attachment A). The maximum residential density permitted in the R-2 District is 5 unites per net acre. There are approximately 1.6 net acres of land that could be built on after subtracting the wetland area. The proposed three lot subdivision would have a net density of 1.86 units per acre. E. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building divided by the total lot area. Floor area is measured from the exterior sides of the exterior walls, but not including covered porches; decks; any space where the average floor-to-ceiling height is less than six feet; attached or detached garages; and other detached accessory structures. The R-2 District allows for an FAR of up to 30 percent for residential structures. The FAR of the new residential dwellings would be verified at the time Building Permit applications are submitted. Section 1325 – General Regulations A. Accessory Structures No accessory structures are proposed to be constructed on Lots 1 or 2 as part of this application. Future homeowners who choose to construct accessory structures will be required to do so in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code. There are two existing accessory structures on Lot 3. Both structures would meet the side and rear yard setback requirement of 10 feet. The maximum number of accessory structures permitted on a residential lot is two and no additional accessory structures would be allowed on Lot 3. Lot Structure Coverage (Square Feet) Structure Coverage (Percentage) Landscape Lot Area (Square Feet) Landscape Lot Area (Percentage) R-2 District Requirements -- 25% (max) -- 65% (min) 1 3,000 7.04% 37,343 87.67% 2 3,000 15.84% 13,481 71.19% 3 2,396 11.03% 17,128 78.85% City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 8 of 14 B. Tree Preservation The Zoning Code requires that a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted as part of an application for a plat. The development plan set includes a Tree Preservation Plan and a replacement Landscape Plan (Attachment D). The survey indicates there are 81 trees on the site. Nine of these trees are damages or diseased and are not counted as significant trees. Of the remaining 72 significant trees, 22 would be removed for the development. The majority (18) of the removed trees would be on the proposed Lot 1 to accommodate the building pad site and two stormwater basins. Four significant trees would be removed from the proposed Lot 2 and no significant trees would be taken down on Lot 3. The 22 significant trees that would be removed total 544 caliper inches. The required mitigation for this removal is 193 caliper inches of new tree plantings. The Landscape Plan includes 30 new trees including 21 evergreen trees, 3 Rad Oaks, and 6 Swamp White Oaks. The total number of replacement caliper inches would be 92.5 for a deficiency of 101 caliper inches. Caliper Inches Number of Trees Total Existing Significant Trees 1,567 72 10% Permitted Removal 157 -- Proposed Removal 544 22 Trees Preserved 1,037 50 Replacement Trees Required* 193.5 -- Replacement Trees Proposed 92.5 30 Replacement Deficiency 101 -- * Replacement trees are calculated by subtracting the ten percent permitted removal from the proposed removal and dividing by two. The Zoning Code states that replacement trees are required to be planted on the same site from which the significant trees are removed, unless the City determines that the number of replacement trees required exceeds the number of trees that can practically fit on the site. The City may require that the 101 caliper inches of additional trees be planted off-site, or a fee in lieu of the off-site plantings may be collected. The fee amount is set as the cost of materials and installation, plus 10 percent. The applicant submitted a letter requesting that all Cottonwood trees on the site not be counted as significant trees because they are a nuisance tree (Attachment G). Seven Cottonwood trees are proposed to be removed on Lot 1. If Cottonwood trees were removed from the Tree Preservation Plan, the required replacement tree amount would be 140 caliper inches and the deficiency would be 47.5 caliper inches. The Zoning Code includes the following definition for a significant tree: A tree that is important to the site and the neighborhood character, that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets at least one of the following standards: City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 9 of 14 • A deciduous hardwood tree that is at least ten (10) caliper inches, including but not limited to, ironwood, catalpa, oak, hard maple, walnut, hickory, birch, black cherry, hackberry, locust and basswood. • A deciduous softwood tree that is at least twelve (12) caliper inches, including but not limited to, cottonwood, poplars/aspen, box elder, willow, silver maple and elm. • A coniferous evergreen tree having foliage on the outermost portion of the branches year-round and which is at least fifteen (15) feet or more in height. • A group of deciduous trees that are at least eight (8) caliper inches or coniferous trees that are at least fifteen (15) feet in height, that provide a buffer or screening along an adjacent public street or between differing land uses. Cottonwood trees that are at least 12 caliper inches in size and are structurally sound and healthy are defined as significant trees under the Zoning Code. Staff would recommend that the Cottonwood trees on the site continue to be counted as significant trees. Additional Review City Building Official The City’s Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no comments at this time. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer and WSB & Associates have reviewed the plans and provided a memo included in Attachment F. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to satisfy all requirements included in this memo. Ramsey County New Brighton Road is a County roadway and plans were provided to Ramsey County for review. The existing right-of-way on New Brighton Road meets the County Master Street Plan. Since the three lots would have access off Thom Drive, a County right-of-way permit would not be required. Lake Johanna Fire Department The Lake Johanna Fire Department has reviewed the plans and does not have any comments at this time. Rice Creek Watershed District The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is charged with reviewing and approving the stormwater management and drainage plan for the project. The applicant submitted a permit application with RCWD on December 5, 2017. RCWD determined that the application was incomplete on December 22, 2017 because the application did not include all items necessary to ensure the proper sizing and placement of the basins. A copy of the approved RCWD permit will need to be provided before the City signs the Final Plat. The drainage basins on Lot 1 will be City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 10 of 14 maintained by the property owner under a maintenance agreement with RCWD and will not be maintained by the City. Findings of Fact Staff offers the following findings of fact for consideration: 1. The property at 3685 New Brighton Road is located in the R-2 – Single and Two-Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The subject property is 83,253 square feet in size with approximately 124 feet on frontage on New Brighton Road and 378 feet of frontage on Thom Drive. 3. The subject property is currently comprised of a single-family residential dwelling, detached garage, and shed. 4. The City has an existing lift station located along the southern line of the subject property along Thom Drive. This lift station is located on private property and the City has a utility easement that permits the City to operate and maintain the lift station. 5. The applicant has requested a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement in order to subdivide the subject property to create three (3) lots for single-family residential dwellings. 6. The proposed Horita Acres subdivision meets the Minimum Subdivision Design Standards included in Section 1130 of the Arden Hills City Code. 7. The park dedication requirement for this application is six percent of the buildable land area in the subdivision or a park dedication fee of $6,500 per lot. Six percent of the development would be 0.11 acres which would not allow for a feasible park area. The park dedication fee of $6,500 per new lot will be applied in this case. 8. The proposed Horita Acres subdivision meets or will be required to meet the Required Improvements for subdivisions included in Section 1140 of the Arden Hills City Code. 9. The proposed Horita Acres subdivision would result in three (3) lots that would conform to the minimum lot area and dimension requirements for the R-2 District. 10. The R-2 District permits residential densities of up to five (5) units per net acre. 11. The proposed Horita Acres subdivision would have a density of approximately 1.86 units per net acre. 12. The proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 could be developed for a single-family residential dwelling and meet the setback, lot coverage, height, and FAR requirements for the R-2 District. 13. The proposed Lot 3 would meet the lot coverage requirements for the R-2 District. 14. The existing dwelling on Lot 3 has a deck that would encroach into the proposed western side yard setback and within a drainage and utility easement. 15. The existing accessory structures on Lot 3 would meet the accessory structure setback requirements for the R-2 District. 16. Based on the submitted Tree Preservation Plan 193.5 caliper inches of new tree plantings are required based on the amount of significant tree caliper inches removed. 17. The applicant has proposed a Landscape Plan that includes 92.5 caliper inches of new tree plantings. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 11 of 14 18. Section 1325.055 of the City Code states that replacement trees are required to planted on the same site from which significant trees are removed, unless the City determines that the number of replacement trees exceeds the number of trees that can practically fit on the site. The City may require the additional replacement trees be planted off-site, or a fee in lieu of the off-site plantings may be collected set as the cost of materials and installation, plus ten percent. Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-029, staff is recommending the twenty-two (22) conditions of approval listed below. The first recommended condition is that the Preliminary Plat approval be contingent on the City Council approval of the Vacation of Easement request, which will be reviewed at a public hearing on January 22, 2018. The applicant has submitted a letter responding to the recommended conditions on tree replacement requirements and park dedication fees (Attachment G). 1. The Preliminary Plat approval shall be contingent upon City Council approval of the request to vacate a portion of the existing easement for the City lift station on the proposed Lot 2. 2. The Final Plat shall be revised to provide for a twelve (12) foot wide drainage easement to the north of the building pad site on the proposed Lot 2. 3. The Final Plat shall be revised to provide for a drainage easement around Basin 1 on the proposed Lot 1 at an elevation of 891.00, and for a drainage easement around Basin 2 on the proposed Lot 1 at an elevation of 889.00. 4. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be executed prior to execution of the Final Plat. 6. The Developer shall submit a park dedication fee in the amount of $13,000, subject to the approval of the City Council. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 7. The Developer shall provide the City with a copy of the approved Rice Creek Watershed District Permit prior to the execution of the Final Plat by the City. 8. The developer shall file the Final Plat with the Ramsey County Recorder and provide the City with a recorded copy within sixty (60) days of approval. 9. The proposed project may require permits, including, but not limited to, MPCA-NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MPCA- Sanitary Sewer City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 12 of 14 Extension, Ramsey County and City Right of Way, and City Grading and Erosion Control permits. Copies of all issued permits shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any development permits. 10. Final grading and drainage plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the commencement of any construction on the site. 11. The Developer shall be required to meet the requirements as outlined in the memo from WSB & Associates dated December 7, 2017. 12. The signed Maintenance Agreement between the RCWD and the Developer for the drainage basins on Lot 1 shall be provided to the City before the issuance of any development permits. The City shall not be responsible for the maintenance of the drainage basins located on Lot 1. 13. Before construction, grading, or land clearing begins, trees or tree areas that are to be preserved shall be visibly marked and city-approved tree protection fencing or other method shall be installed and maintained at the critical root zones of the trees to be protected. The location of the fencing shall be in conformance with the approved tree preservation plan. 14. A Letter of Credit in the amount of 125 percent of the cost of materials and installation for the required replacement tree plantings shall be provided prior to the issuance of a Grading and Erosion Control permit. The Letter of Cred shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation of the replacements trees. 15. The Developer shall work with the City to find alternative locations for the 101 caliper inches of replacement trees off-site, or a fee in lieu of the replacement tress will be required equaling the cost of materials and installation plus ten percent, as determined by the City Council. 16. Survey monuments shall be placed and installed at all block corners, angle points, points of curves in streets, and at intermediate points as shown on the Final Plat. Pipes or streel rods shall be placed at the corners of each lot. 17. The Developer shall be required to stake metal markers along the drainage easement abutting the infiltration basis and wetland with signs stating the area is a natural vegetation/infiltration area and no dumping is allowed. The design of the signs shall be approved by the City prior to installation. 18. Sewer and water for the subdivision shall be obtained by connections to the City water and sewer systems. Extension of City services shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and all associated costs shall be the responsibility of the developer. 19. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 20. The deck on the existing single-family dwelling at 3685 New Brighton Road shall be removed or modified in order to meet the side yard setback requirement and not encroach on any drainage and utility easement prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 1 or Lot 2, or the Developer shall be required to submit a cash escrow with the City to ensure the removal of the deck within six (6) months from the approval of the Final Plat. 21. The driveway for the existing single-family dwelling at 3685 New Brighton Road shall be relocated to Thom Drive prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 1 or Lot 2, City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 13 of 14 or the Developer shall be required to submit a cash escrow with the City to ensure the relocation of the driveway within six (6) months from the approval of the Final Plat. 22. The Developer shall conform to all other City regulations. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the twenty-two (22) conditions in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the January 10, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case Planning Case Planning Case 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Notice was published in the Arden Hills-Shoreview Bulletin on December 20, 2017. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Public Comments Staff has corresponded with the residents at 2033 Thom Court and 3695 New Brighton Road regarding this planning case. The residents requested additional information and expressed concerns about drainage issues and tree removal. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-029 - 3685 New Brighton Road Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation\Memos_Reports_17-029 Page 14 of 14 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 4, 2017. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by February 2, 2018 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Site and Aerial Maps C. Horita Acres Preliminary Plat & Site Plans D. Horita Acres Final Plat E. Depiction and Legal Description for Vacation of Easement F. Memo from WSB & Associates, December 7, 2017 G. Letter from Timothy Horita, January 3, 2018 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 600.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet600.00300.00 3685 New Brighton Road 3,600 Enter Map Description Notes This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division 200.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet Feet200.00100.00 3685 New Brighton Road 1,200 Enter Map Description Notes IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SUMMARY LOT PRO. IMP. (SQFT)COVERAGE 1 5251 12.5% 2 4610 + 845 29.4% 3 4595 21.4% (LIFT STATION) LOCATION MAP 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-COVR 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT/EXISTING COND. GRADING PLANSITE/UTILITY PLAN LEGEND SHEETCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX1.2. 4. 5.6. HORITA ACRES PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLANS ARDEN HILLS MINNESOTA COVER SHEET Know what's below. before you dig.Call R I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 7.DETAILS 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN L1.LANDSCAPE PLANT1.TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-LEGEND 2LEGEND SHEET I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-EXCOND 3PRELIMINAY PLAT & EXISTING CONDITIONS c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 11-08-2017 HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-SITE-UTIL 4SITE / UTILITY PLANI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-GRAD 5GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments LEGEND 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-EROS 6EROSION CONTROL PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments · · · · · · 01-ENG-117282-SHEET-DTLS 7DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 7OF JMM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 PJC/JMM 19860 11-08-2017 Paul J. Cherne HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 00-PLAN-117282-SHEET-LAND L1LANDSCAPE PLAN c OF Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 1TML TML 00-PLAN-117282-SHEET-TREE T1TREE PRESERVATION PLAN c OF Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2017 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson HORITA ACRES ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 11-08-2017 HORITA 3685 NEW BRIGHTON ROAD ARDEN HILLS, 55112 1. 11-29-17 City Comments 1TML TML CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS S h e e t Description Sketch for:1 o f 1 c 2015 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Tim Horita CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681-1914 www.pioneereng.comFax: 681-9488 Cad File: 117282-EASEMENT VACATE.dwg Folder #: 4378 Drawn by:TSS 701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800 Building a legacy – your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com K:\03455-000\Admin\Docs\Plan Reviews\2017-12-07 Horita Acres\3455-000 Horita Acres Review Submittal 171207.docx Memorandum To: Sue Polka – Arden Hills Public Works Director / City Engineer From: Matt Schulz – WSB Date: December 7, 2017 Re: Horita Acres Stormwater Review Comments WSB Project No. 03455-000 WSB has reviewed the documents provided by Pioneer Engineering P.A. on 12/04/17 for the Horita Acres Project. Documents reviewed include: · Storm Water Management Plan dated 11/03/17, Revised 11/29/17 · Full Plan Set Dated 11/08/17 We offer the following comments based on review of the above documents. 1. General a. Please note, a permit will need obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for Rule D and Rule F. Additional RCWD Rules may apply. Verify with RCWD as necessary. b. Provide a maintenance agreement to ensure that the BMPs will be inspected and maintained long term. The agreement at a minimum shall include the following: i. Who will conduct maintenance ii. Inspection frequency. iii. Maintenance necessary to ensure effective performance. iv. Maintenance intervals. v. Removal of settled materials. vi. Maintenance of vegetation. 2. Plat a. Drainage easements shall be at least twelve feet wide per City Code 1130.05. Drainage easement to the north of lot two is shown as a 10’ easement. Please revise. b. Ponding easements shall be taken to two feet above the emergency overflow elevation per City Code 1130.05. On this site that equates to elevation 891.00 around Pond 1 and 889.00 around Pond 2. Easement line around ponding areas appear to be lower that this elevation on the proposed grading plan. Please revise. 3. Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) a. The drainage areas listed in Table in section III.A of the SWMP do not match the drainage areas in the HydroCAD report. Please correct the discrepancy or explain the difference. Example, 1.636 acres total in HydroCAD and 1.879 acres total in table. This comment was also made on previous submittal. b. The site appears to receive off site drainage from New Brighton Road and Thom Drive based on the existing contours in the drainage area maps. Please verify and revise the proposed and existing drainage areas as necessary to account for all offsite drainage tributary to the site and Pond 1. This comment was also made on previous submittal. Horita Acres Review Comments December 7, 2017 Page 2 K:\03455-000\Admin\Docs\Plan Reviews\2017-12-07 Horita Acres\3455-000 Horita Acres Review Submittal 171207.docx 4. Stormwater, Grading, and Drainage a. We recommend that the outlet control structures be revised to use larger orifices. The proposed outlet control structures will likely clog with debris at the 1” and 1.5” orifices without sufficient protection, especially when the orifice is located at the pond invert. A trash grate should be installed. Efforts should be made to protect the low orifices from ice formation. If clogging of the small orifices occurs the ponds will fill with stormwater which will degrade the aesthetics of the pond and attract mosquitos and other insects. The MPCA stormwater manual highly recommends a minimum orifice of 3” when in tandem using an external trash rack and minimum of 1” when using an internal orifice protection. If a small orifice is utilized, the basin should be modeled assuming this orifice is clogged to verify that the stormwater basin still meets freeboard and peak rate discharge requirements. b. We recommend installing a type of trash rack, grate, or end treatment over the top of the 8” riser to prevent clogging of the outlet device from debris and floatables. c. We recommend sloping the stormwater basins to provide adequate overland drainage to the outlet device. This will prevent the creation of small ponding depressions which will degrade the aesthetics of the ponds. 5. Storm Sewer a. Culvert analysis in HydroCAD shows the same drainage area parameters for both drainage areas routed to the culvert. Please verify drainage areas are correct, revise as necessary, and verify culvert is still sized appropriately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Matt Schulz Highway Drainage Engineer (612) 322-2124 mschulz@wsbeng.com City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Commission\Work Plan\2018 Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2018 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner SUBJECT: 2018 Work Plan and Project Priorities Discussion Requested Action Review the draft 2018 Work Plan and provide input. Background The City Council will be asking the Planning Commission to join them for a joint Work Session in early 2018 to discuss the Work Plan for the upcoming year. To assist in that discussion, staff would like the Planning Commission to provide input on topics that might be addressed at this meeting. While the Council will make the final determination as to the goals and priorities for the coming year, it will be useful for them to have input from the Planning Commission. Discussion The Planning Commission differs from the City’s other committees and commissions in that the purpose and scope of the Commission’s work is largely determined by State Statute. The majority of the Planning Commission work plan is dedicated to continuing the work of evaluating and providing recommendations on land use applications, zoning code amendments, and other planning related items that come before the City. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Cities in the seven-county metropolitan area are required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act to update their Comprehensive Plans every 10 years. These updates are required to ensure consistency with the regional system plan that is prepared by the Metropolitan Council. The City began work on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in March 2017 and the Planning Commission has provided input throughout the update process. The Comprehensive Plan is expected to be City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 P:\Planning\Planning Commission\Work Plan\2018 Page 2 of 2 completed in early 2018. The Planning Commission is expected to review a draft of the entire Comprehensive Plan in February and to hold a public hearing on the plan in March. The Land Use chapter in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes several recommendations for additional planning studies and evaluations of existing zoning regulations. After the Comprehensive Plan is approved, the City Council and Planning Commission will need to evaluate which of these recommendations should be prioritized for 2018. This may add additional tasks to the 2018 Work Plan. Sign Code Over the last few years, the City has processed several applications requesting flexibility from regulations included in its Sign Code. In 2017, the Planning Commission began the work of reviewing the existing Sign Code and how neighboring communities regulate signage. Staff has continued to work on this item throughout 2017 and expects to complete the review and make any recommended changes between April and July 2018. Planning Commission Training Opportunities The League of Minnesota Cities offers an online learning land use series as part of their loss control program. All of the Planning Commissioners have completed the first course in the series. The League provides liability insurance to Arden Hills and has found that cities that have Commissioners who are educated about land use law are less likely to be sued or lose lawsuits when they are filed. If Commissioners are interested in taking the second course, which focuses on developing land use plans and regulations, staff can assist with registration. Government Training Services (GTS) also offers land use planning courses. Information regarding dates and locations for that series will be emailed to the Planning Commission as they are made available. These courses are designed for Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners, and are typically offered in ful l and half day sessions throughout the Twin Cities. The courses are well done and provide a wealth of information regarding land use fundamentals. Planning Commissioners are required to participate in at least one of the GTS courses during their term in order to be appointed to a subsequent term. Attachments A. Draft 2018 Work Plan Planning Commission 2018 Work Plan City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 ▪ Arden Hills Minnesota 55112 Phone 651.634.5120 ▪ Fax 651.634.5137 www.cityofardenhills.org 2018 Planning Goals Work Tasks Schedule Review and Make Recommendations on Land Use Applications  Meet monthly to review and hold public hearings  Review staff reports and recommendations Yearlong Zoning Ordinance Update  Review and make recommendations on periodic zoning code amendments  Continue ordinance updates as time allows Yearlong 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update  Assist consultant firm in reviewing and updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan January - March Sign Code  Complete review of existing Sign Code  Make recommendations for updates to the Sign Code April - July Training  Complete the League of Minnesota Cities online land use learning course  Attend a GTS land use planning course as available Yearlong New Member Recruitment  Newsletter article  Website advertisement  Word of mouth recruiting Yearlong City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 10, 2018 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2018 PC Agenda Item 5.A TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner SUBJECT: Report from the City Council November 13, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting The City Council approved Planning Case 17-026 for minor modifications to the Site Plan for the expansion of the Boston Scientific sterilization facility (approved in Planning Case 17-013). The modifications included an expanded paved area adjacent to the facility, a wider curb cut for the existing driveway on Cummings Park Drive, and a reduction in the length of the center island on Cummings Park Drive. The changes to the approved Site Plan were deemed minor and the requirement for a public hearing was waived by the City Council. November 27, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting The City Council approved Planning Case 17-024 for a PUD Amendment at 1160 County Road E. The approval will allow Arden Square to complete site modifications to accommodate a drive- thru lane for Dunn Brothers Coffee. The City Council approved amendments to the plans regarding traffic control at the southwest corner of the site, signage illumination, and the size of the wall sign on the south building façade. December 11, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting The City Council adopted the budget for 2018 and set the final levy for taxes payable at their Regular Meeting on December 11, 2017. The adopted budget was in the amount of $20,548,300. The tax levy was increased by 4 percent for a total taxes payable amount of $3,786,942.