Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-20-18-WSAGENDA ITEMS Tobacco 21 Julie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Vegetation Removal And Clear Cutting Joel Jamnik, City Attorney MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Council Tracker Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF SLWA Follow Up Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Sympathy/Greeting Card Floral Arrangement Policy Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Preliminary General Fund Budget Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF TCAAP Discussion Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Steve Scott      City Council Work Session Agenda   August 20, 2018 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. CALL TO ORDER 1. 1.A. Documents: 1.B. Documents: 1.C. Documents: 1.D. Documents: 1.E. Documents: 1.F. Documents: 1.G. Documents: 2. AGENDA ITEMSTobacco 21Julie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFVegetation Removal And Clear CuttingJoel Jamnik, City Attorney MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFCouncil Tracker UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFSLWA Follow UpDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Sympathy/Greeting Card Floral Arrangement Policy Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Preliminary General Fund Budget Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF TCAAP Discussion Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott     City Council Work Session Agenda  August 20, 20185:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents:1.C.Documents:1.D.Documents: 1.E. Documents: 1.F. Documents: 1.G. Documents: 2. AGENDA ITEM – 1A MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Tobacco 21 Presentation Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Providing direction regarding increasing the age to 21 regarding tobacco purchases and/or restricting the sale of flavored tobacco in Arden Hills. Background The Council previously requested information regarding the Tobacco 21 initiative. Many cities in the metro area are supporting this initiative. Should the Council wish to support the implementation of tobacco restrictions in Arden Hills, an ordinance amendment would be required. Staff would work with Tobacco 21 and the City Attorney should the Council wish to move forward. Kristen Ackert of Tobacco 21 will provide a presentation regarding this initiative and will answer questions the Council may have. Attached for your review are handouts provided by Tobacco 21. Attachments Attachment A: Various literature from Tobacco 21 RetailImpactofRaisingTobaccoSalesAgeto21Years The majority of tobacco use emerges in individuals beforetheyreach21yearsof age, and many adult distrib- utors of tobacco to youths are young adults aged be- tween 18 and 20 years. Raising the tobacco sales minimum age to 21 years across the United States would decrease tobacco re- tailer and industry sales by approximately2%butcould contribute to a substantial reduction in the prevalence of youths’ tobacco use and dependency by limiting ac- cess. (Am J Public Health. 2014;104:e18–e21. doi:10. 2105/AJPH.2014.302174) Jonathan P. Winickoff, MD, MPH, Lester Hartman, MD, MPH, Minghua L. Chen, MD, MPH, Mark Gottlieb, JD, Emara Nabi-Burza, MBBS, MS, and Joseph R. DiFranza, MD RECENT RESEARCH HAS HIGH- lighted the susceptibility of the young adult brain torapid nicotine addiction.1,2 While individuals are still experimenting with tobacco use and before they are aware of their own level of addiction, they first want, then crave, then need cigarettes, at which point they are unable to quit. 1 Individuals who begin smoking at a young age are more likely to become addicted, progress to daily smoking, become heavier tobacco users as adults, and have difficulty quitting. 3,4 The US Surgeon General has expressed concern about the po- tential long-term cognitive effects of exposure to nicotine during brain development with the potential for lasting adverse consequences. 5 For many years, public health strategies focused on preventing the onset of nicotine addiction by relying on the strict enforcement of laws that prevent the sale of tobacco to minors younger than 18 years. Indeed, successful ef- forts to limit tobacco access of minors by disrupting the sale of tobacco to minors have made an important contribution toward reductions in the prevalence of tobacco use among minors. 6 A factor that might limit the impact of preventing the sale of tobacco to minors is the fact that, in most communities, 18- to 20-year-olds who can legally pur- chase cigarettes provide them to younger friends and family mem- bers.7 The majority (59%) of 18- and 19-year-olds have been asked by someone younger than 18 years to buy cigarettes for them.8 Also, high-school students are less likely to have 21-year-old adults than 18- to 20-year-old adults in their social circles, sug- gesting reduced opportunities to access tobacco from older buyers. 9 Inhibiting this well-established distribution cycle provides one rationale for increasing the legal age for tobacco sales to 21 years. Another rationale stems from the 2012 Surgeon General’s re- port finding that almost 90% of smokers in the United States be- gan smoking before the age of 21 years.4,10 The report concludes that if young people can remain free of tobacco, most will never start to smoke. Currently, people who reach the age of 21 years as a nonsmoker have a minimal chance of ever becoming a smoker. For these reasons, there is interest in extending the benefits of re- stricting tobacco sales to individ- uals younger than 21 years. RECENT CHANGES IN US TOBACCO SALES AGE LAWS In consideration of the potential beneficial public health impact of raising the tobacco sales age to 21 years, some US cities and counties (New York City; Suffolk County, NY; Hawaii County, HI; and Needham, Arlington, Sharon, Canton, Ashland, Wellesley, Dedham, Dover, Norwood, Scituate, West Boylston, Hudson, Winchester, Wakefield, Reading, and Melrose counties, MA) have already ap- proved legislation for raising the age to 21 years, and other cities, counties, and states are making legislative or regulatory efforts to approve similar proposals. With a single exception, all of these measures were adopted in either 2013 or 2014. Clearly, the idea of increasing the minimum to- bacco sales age to 21 years has momentum.11 The tobacco industry and re- tailers argue that raising the sales age to 21 years will significantly hurt businesses that depend on tobacco sales. 12,13 We sought to determine the proportion of the current legal tobacco market (‡18 years) that is consumed by18- to 20-year-old smokers to determine the potential impact to retailers if the tobacco sales age of 21 years was universally implemented and enforced. We obtained self-reported data regarding cigarette consumption by age from the 2011 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The survey includes both citizen and noncitizen noninstitutional- ized civilian American house- holds. We analyzed data from 33014 respondents who were asked questions about smoking in the NHIS Sample Core Adult Health Behavior Section (‡18 years) database. Current smokers were identified as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and still smoking when surveyed. We sought to calculate the volume of cigarette products consumed by individuals, between the ages of 18 and 20 years. Be- cause the data were derived from self-reported cigarettes smoked, it accounts for any tobacco used to “roll your own,”as well as small cigars that are functionally iden- tical to cigarettes. Tobacco con- sumed by 15- to 17-year-old smokers was not included as sales to this population are already illegal under federal law. PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY BRIEFS e18 |Public Health Policy Briefs |Peer Reviewed |Winickoff et al.American Journal of Public Health |November 2014, Vol 104, No. 11 We used SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to conduct data analysis. We calculated mean average daily and annual cigarette consumption for current smokers aged 18 to 20 years and those aged 21 years or older to determine the proportion of total cigarette consumption that is attributable to 18- to 20-year-old smokers. In our sample of 33014 (Table 1), there were 6138 (18.6%) cur- rent smokers, 188 (15.2% smoking prevalence) in the 18- to 20-year- old group and 5950 (18.7% smoking prevalence) in the group aged 21 years and older. The 18- to 20-year-old group of cur- rent smokers were 49% female, 77% White, 18% Hispanic, and 16% Black, and the current smokers aged 21 years or older were 48% female, 77% White, 12% Hispanic, and 17% Black. About 37% of 18- to 20-year-old respondents lived with 3 or more household members compared with 4% of those aged 21 years or older (P <.001). Table 2 demonstrates the lower daily cigarette consumption of those aged 18 to 20 years versus those aged 21 years or older (8.6 per day vs 12.5 per day; P <.001). We also found out that 18- to 20-year-old smokers make up 3.06% of the total adult smoking population but ac- count for just 2.12% of cigarette consumption. EFFECTS ON TOBACCO INDUSTRY AND RETAILERS If one assumes that the number of cigarettes smoked by 18- to 20-year-old smokers corresponds to the number of cigarettes sold to them or to others on their behalf, the maximum immediate loss of sales would be just 2% of the total cigarette sales in the United States. If we assume that this intervention would have a long-term impact on the prevalence of smoking by adolescents and young adults, the gradual aging of this low-tobacco- use cohort would give plenty of time for small businesses to adjust to changing market conditions were the minimum legal tobacco sales age raised to 21 years. Similar objections were raised decades ago when the national minimum drinking age was pro- posed to be raised to 21 years. After the law was passed and implemented by most states in the 1980s, a reduction in drinking, problematic drinking, drinking and driving, and alcohol-related crashes among youths was seen. 14 The alcohol industry still survived by adapting to the changing mar- ket despite the loss of sales to those younger than 21 years. Fur- thermore, retailers are already required under federal rules to check the ID of anyone who ap- pears to be younger than 27 years seeking to purchase tobacco, 15 so an age-21 requirement would place no additional compliance burdens on their staff. The fact that more than one third of the 18- to 20-year-old young adults live with 3 or more individuals highlights the additional potential for blocking the transfer of to- bacco use behavior to other household members. OVERALL IMPLICATIONS The evolving neuroscience of the young adult brain demonstrates TABLE 1—Basic Characteristics of Respondents and Current Smokers: 2011 National Health Interview Survey, United States Characteristics Respondents Aged 18–20 Years (n =1239), No. (%) or Mean 6SD Current Smokers Aged 18–20 Years (n=188), No. (%) or Mean 6SD Respondents Aged ‡21 Years (n =31775), No. (%) or Mean 6SD Current Smokers Aged ‡21 Years (n=5950), No. (%) or Mean 6SD Gender Male 610 (49.23) 96 (51.06) 14201 (44.69) 3112 (52.30) Female 629 (50.77) 92 (48.94) 17574 (55.31) 2838 (47.70) Race/ethnicity White 867 (69.98) 144 (76.6) 24207 (76.18) 4570 (76.81) Black 245 (19.77) 31 (16.49) 4948 (15.57) 1031 (17.33) American Indian/Alaska Native 22 (1.78) 2 (1.06) 375 (1.18) 108 (1.82) Asian Indian 9 (0.73) 0 (0) 394 (1.24) 28 (0.47) Chinese 19 (1.53) 1 (0.53) 458 (1.44) 35 (0.59) Filipino 18 (1.45) 3 (1.6) 450 (1.42) 49 (0.82) Other Asian 43 (3.47) 6 (3.19) 775 (2.44) 100 (1.68) Not released 4 (0.32) 0 (0) 74 (0.23) 8 (0.13) Multiple race 12 (0.97) 1 (0.53) 94 (0.30) 21 (0.35) Hispanic 318 (25.67) 33 (17.55) 5549 (17.46) 721 (12.12) Household number per family 1 524 (42.29) 87 (46.28) 22369 (70.4) 4368 (73.41) 2 257 (20.74) 55 (29.26) 8159 (25.68) 1328 (22.32) 3 305 (24.62) 34 (18.09) 841 (2.65) 178 (2.99) ‡4 153 (12.35) 12 (6.38) 406 (1.28) 76 (1.28) Mean 6SD 2.12 61.2 1.88 61.07 1.36 60.66 1.33 60.66 Current smoker 188 (15.2) 5950 (18.7) Note. The sample size was n=33014 participants. PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY BRIEFS November 2014, Vol 104, No. 11 |American Journal of Public Health Winickoff et al.|Peer Reviewed |Public Health Policy Briefs |e19 a special susceptibility to even experimental tobacco use. 1 Low minimum sales age laws exploit that susceptibility to addict youths to cigarettes for life, with relatively few cigarettes. Meanwhile, raising the sales age would appear likely to have a significant effect on current tobacco use rates among youths, decreasing the chances of a person ever becoming tobacco dependent. By some estimates, raising the tobacco sales age to 21 years would reduce tobacco use prevalence by 55% for 15- to 17-year-old adolescents within 7 years. 16 In 2005, Needham, Massachu- setts, was the first town in the country to implement the law to raise the tobacco sales age to 21 years. Following the implementa- tion of the law, the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System and Metro West Health Founda- tions’Adolescent Health survey data showed a 47% reduction in Needham high-school smoking rate in the 4 years (2006---2010) after the legislation was imple- mented.17 Of note, no tobacco re- tailers have gone out of business in Needham since implementation. LIMITATIONS Although we have not spe- cifically accounted for other non- cigarette tobacco or smokeless tobacco sales, we have accounted for any tobacco that is smoked and self-reported as a cigarette, the form that has the highest disease burden. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, about 90% of all combustible tobacco consumption is cigarettes among adult smokers. 18 In addition, 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey data indicate that the majority of tobacco consump- tion remains cigarettes, and high- school students in the young adult age range (>17 years) are 3 times more likely to smoke cigarettes daily than use any other combina- tion of cigars, bidis, and cigarillos on a daily basis. Adult versus youth smokeless tobacco use rates and amount consumed are much harder to quantify and we intentionally ex- cluded these to avoid reporting bias. In addition, the US retail cigarette market is more than 30 times greater than the smokeless tobacco market, making any adult versus youth consumption dis- crepancy unlikely to change our overall estimate of the tobacco sales impact. 19 CONCLUSIONS Overall, a small percentage of total tobacco sales (2%) is at- tributed to those younger than 21years, yet most lifetime tobacco users start smoking before the age of 21 years. Early tobacco initiation during young adulthood comes with a high probability of addiction, progression to daily smoking, and heavier tobacco use in adulthood, and has long-term harmful health consequences. Action on this critical issue of raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21 years across the United States has excellent public health and ethical rationales, and costs almost nothing to implement through existing regulatory frameworks.j About the Authors Jonathan P. Winickoff, Minghua L. Chen, and Emara Nabi-Burza are with the Center for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Policy, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston. Lester Hartman is with Westwood/ Mansfield Pediatrics, Westwood, MA. Mark Gottlieb is with the Public Health Advocacy Institute, Northeastern Univer- sity School of Law, Boston. Joseph R. DiFranza is with the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Univer- sity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. CorrespondenceshouldbesenttoJonathan P. Winickoff, MD, MPH, Center for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Policy, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassachusettsGeneralHospitalforChildren, 15th Floor, Suite 1542A, 100 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: jwinickoff@ partners.org). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.orgbyclickingthe “Reprints” link. This article was accepted June 26, 2014. Contributors J. P. Winickoff originated and designed this study, drafted the article and revised it, and takes full responsibility for the final submission. L. Hartman, M. Gottlieb, E. Nabi-Burza, and J. R. DiFranza made substantial intellectual contributions to the conceptualization and design of the study, and to editing the article. M. L. Chen advised on and conducted data analyses, and participated in the inter- pretation of results. All authors approved the final article as submitted. Acknowledgments This study was supported by the Na- tional Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant R01-CA127127 (J. P. Winickoff) and 2R01-CA087571 (M. Gottlieb), the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Agency for Health- care Research and Quality. Note.The funders had no role in the design or conduct of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, or prepa- ration, review and approval of the article. HumanParticipantProtection This study was exempt from institutional review board approval because it is a secondary data analysis of a publicly available data set. References 1. DiFranza JR, Wellman R, Mermelstein R, et al. The natural history and diagnosis of nicotine addiction.Curr Pediatr Rev. 2011;7:88---96. 2. Zhan W, Dierker LC, Rose JS, Selya A, Mermelstein RJ. The natural course of nicotine dependence symptoms among adolescent smokers.Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(12):1445---1452. 3. Taioli E, Wynder EL. Effect of the age at which smoking begins on frequency of smoking in adulthood. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(13):968---969. 4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use TABLE 2—Average Cigarette Consumption by Age for Current Smokers and Percentage of 18- to 20-Year-Old Smokers as a Percentage of Total Adult Cigarette Consumption: 2011 National Health Interview Survey, United States Variable All Participants Aged ‡18 Years, Mean of No. Participants Aged 18–20 Years Participants Aged ‡21 Years Participants Aged 18–20 Years, % of Total Sample Average daily cigarette consumption per smoker 12.38 8.57 12.50 Average annual cigarette consumption per smoker 4520.28 3131.62 4564.16 No. of current smokers 6138 188 3.06 Total no. of cigarettes smoked in 2011 27745475 588745 2.12 Note. Current smokers included both daily and nondaily users, and lifetime consumption of greater than 100 cigarettes. The same size was n=33014 participants, including n=6138 current smokers; 18.6% of the population reported lifetime use of greater than 100 cigarettes and some level of current use. PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY BRIEFS e20 |Public Health Policy Briefs |Peer Reviewed |Winickoff et al.American Journal of Public Health |November 2014, Vol 104, No. 11 among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General, 2012. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/ library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco- use/#Full%20Report. Accessed November 26, 2013. 5. US Department of Health and Human Services.The health consequences of smoking —50 yearsof progress: a report of the Surgeon General, 2014. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/ library/reports/50-years-of-progress/exec- summary.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2014. 6. DiFranza JR. Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?Tob Control. 2012;21(4):436---442. 7. DiFranza JR, Coleman M. Sources of tobacco for youths in communities with strong enforcement of youth access laws. Tob Control. 2001;10(4):323---328. 8. Ribisl KM, Norman GJ, Howard- Pitney B, Howard KA. Which adults do underaged youth ask for cigarettes?Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1561---1564. 9. Ahmad S. Closing the youth access gap: the projected health benefits and cost savings of a national policy to raise the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States.Health Policy. 2005;75(1):74---84. 10. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy first look report 3. Pathways to established smoking: results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation; 2000. 11. Winickoff JP, Gottlieb M, Mello MM. Tobacco 21—an ideawhose time hascome. NEnglJMed. 2014;370(4):295---297. 12. Discussion draft sociopoliticalstrategy. Chart. January 21, 1986. Philip Morris. Bates no. 2043440040/0049. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ aba84e00. Accessed January 10, 2014. 13. Wade CM. Proposal on teen smok- ing decried. Available at: http://www. bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/ north/2013/12/01/board-plan-increase- tobacco-buying-age-newburyport-riles-store- owners-mayor/9IcbV2ra3L5nCi06jILJJK/ story.html. Accessed February 27, 2014. 14. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Kirley BB. The effects of minimum legal drinking age 21 laws on alcohol-related driving in the United States.J Safety Res. 2010; 41(2):173---181. 15. Cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, 21 CFR § 1140.14(b). 16. Ahmad S, Billimek J. Limiting youth access to tobacco: comparing the long- term health impacts of increasing ciga- rette excise taxes and raising the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States. Health Policy. 2007;80(3):378---391. 17. MetroWest Health Foundation. 2006 and 2010 MetroWest Adolescent Health Surveys. Available at: http://www. mwhealth.org/PublicationsampMedia/ Reports/tabid/192/Default.aspx. Accessed July 1, 2013. 18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco product use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011 and 2012.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(45):893---897 [erratum in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(46):940]. 19. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Topics in brief: smokeless tobacco. Available at: http://www.drugabuse.gov/ publications/topics-in-brief/smokeless- tobacco. Accessed June 18, 2014. PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY BRIEFS November 2014, Vol 104, No. 11 |American Journal of Public Health Winickoff et al.|Peer Reviewed |Public Health Policy Briefs |e21 E-Cigs 2.0: The NextGeneration In the decade-plus since their U.S. introduction, electronic cigarettes, known as e-cigarettes or vapes, drastically evolved. E-cigarettes first resembled conventional cigarettes, and now have morphed into sleek gadgets, like the JUUL pictured at left, that have become the next big thing. Youth love them for the big hit of nicotine and their easily- hidden, deceptive looks. Their resemblance to USB flash drives prompted some schools to ban the drives as teachers can’t tell the difference between the two. Terms like “JUULing or jeweling” and “vaping” have entered the teen vernacular. Users have coined dedicated hash tags on social media and created videos of themselves doing vape tricks or blatantly vaping at school. Blu was formerly the market leader in e-cigarette sales but was redesigned and now resembles JUUL e-cigarettes. JUUL has the largest market share. FACT: Nicotine is harmful to developing brains. Nicotine interferes with brain development and can have a long-term effect on mental health. Even brief or intermittent nicotine exposure during adolescence can cause lasting damage.1 E-cigarette use by youth and young adults increases their risk of using conventional cigarettes in the future.2 So, what’s an e-cigarette? E-cigarettes are battery-operated devices that contain a mixture of liquid nicotine and other chemicals. The device heats this mixture, called e-juice, producing a nicotine aerosol that is inhaled. E-cigarettes are also called e-hookahs, e-pipes, vape pens, hookah pens or personal vaporizers. FACT: E-cigarette use has increased among MN youth. The youth tobacco usage rate has increased for the first time since 2000. This is because of the increase in the use of e-cigarettes. One in five youth (19.2 percent) currently use e-cigarettes, according to the 2017 Minnesota Youth Tobacco Survey. That is a 49 percent increase since 2014’s survey.3 FACT: E-cigarettes are not approved as a cessation tool. E-cigarettes have not been proven to be better for quitting than existing programs.2 For those wanting to quit, there are FDA-approved quit aids such as gum, patches and lozenges, available at little or no cost through insurance companies or Minnesota’s statewide QUITPLAN® Services (www. quitplan.com). The evolution of e-cigarettes Early e-cigarettes resembled conventional cigarettes and were called “cig-a-likes.” They evolved into pen-shaped devices with small tanks that held “e-juice.” Tanks got bigger, morphing into the “mods,” which give users more control of the device. Now, USB-shaped e-cigarettes such as JUUL and Myblu are often discreetly used by youth and pack a huge nicotine punch. SOURCES 1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, January 2014. 2 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018 Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. The National Academies Press. 2018 3 Evered SR. Teens and Tobacco in Minnesota: Highlights from the 2017 Minnesota Youth Tobacco Survey: Minnesota Center for Health Statistics, Minnesota Department of Health, February 2018. 4 US Surgeon General (2012). Preventing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Association for Nonsmokers-Minnesota is dedicated to reducing the human and economic costs of tobacco use in Minnesota. (April 2018) 2395 University Avenue W, Suite 310, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-646-3005 | www.ansrmn.org FACT: E-cigarettes are marketed toward youth.FACT: E-cigarettes are not harm-free. E-cigarettes contribute to indoor air pollution. Studies have found nicotine, heavy metals, toxins, and carcinogens in e-cigarette aerosol.2 Companies such as JUUL, NJoy, blu and MarkTen target youth with heavy marketing in magazines and social media. In Minnesota, 88.4 percent of students had seen ads promoting e-cigarettes in the past 30 days.3 E-cigarettes come in a variety of youth- friendly flavors, such as gummy bear, fruit punch, chocolate, cherry crush and mango.4 (Images courtesy of trinketsandtrash.org) Flavored Tobacco Products WHAT TYPES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS ARE FLAVORED? Flavored tobacco products include cigars, chewing tobacco, blunt wraps, electronic cigarettes and shisha, the tobacco used in hookah. These products help the tobacco industry get around the FDA’s 2009 ban of flavored cigarettes.1 Flavored tobacco products are often sold in attractive packaging for a low price. Some cigars are frequently available for less than $1. WHAT ARE SOME COMMON FLAVORS USED IN TOBACCO PRODUCTS? Cigars, chewing tobacco, blunt wraps, electronic cigarettes and shisha are sold in fruit, candy, dessert and novelty flavors. Popular flavors include chocolate, piña colada, apple, grape, berry, cotton candy, bubble gum, wintergreen and menthol. The same flavorings used in tobacco products are also used in candy and Kool-Aid drink mixes.2 These flavorings were often present in higher amounts in tobacco products than in candy. WHO USES FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS? Because of their sweet flavors, low cost and attractive packaging, flavored tobacco products are especially appealing to youth. Young people are much more likely to use flavored tobacco products than adults.3 A recent CDC study found that 42 percent of middle and high school tobacco users use flavored products.4 Studies show that young people perceive flavored tobacco products as tasting better and being safer than unflavored products, even though they are just as dangerous and addictive as cigarettes.5 These pineapple-flavored cigars are cheap and easily accessible to youth. Swisher Sweets come in flavors such as grape, strawberry and chocolate. Smokeless and spit tobacco are available in flavors such as cherry and wintergreen. The tobacco industry’s own internal documents state sweet products are “…for younger people, beginner cigarette smokers, teenagers…when you feel like a smoke, you want to be reminded of bubble gum.”8 WHAT CAN COMMUNITIES DO ABOUT FLAVORED PRODUCTS? Flavored tobacco products are a major public health concern because they encourage young people to start using tobacco. While the FDA banned flavored cigarettes other than menthol in 2009, the ban does not affect other tobacco products, many of which are now heavily marketed by the tobacco industry. The use of these products, especially among young people, has spiked. Because the FDA ruling does not prevent local communities from banning other types of flavored tobacco products, state and local governments can adopt laws that restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products within their jurisdiction. Limiting the sale of products, setting a minimum price or creating a minimum pack size are some of the ways communities can protect their youth by making flavored tobacco products less accessible and less appealing. “Cherry Skoal is for somebody who likes the taste of candy, if you know what I am saying.” U.S. Tobacco Executive WHAT OTHER COMMUNITIES HAVE TAKEN A STANCE AGAINST FLAVORED PRODUCTS? In Minnesota, the cities of Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Shoreview, Saint Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Duluth, Falcon Heights and Mendota Heights restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products. Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Duluth and Falcon Heights also restrict the sale of menthol tobacco products. Additionally, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Richfield, Maplewood and Robbinsdale have set minimum prices on cheap cigars, many of which are flavored and attractive to youth. New York City and Providence, R.I., passed policies restricting flavored tobacco sales, with the exception of menthol-flavored products. San Francisco and Oakland passed ordinances restricting the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol. SOURCES 1 One Hundred Eleventh United States Congress.(2009). Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. 2 Brown, et. al. “Candy Flavorings in Tobacco.” New England Journal of Medicine; 370:2250-2252 June 5, 2014. 3 King BA, Dube SR, and Tynan MA. 2013. “Flavored Cigar Smoking Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 15(2): 608-614; Villanti AC, Richardson A, Vallone DM, et al. 2013. “Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among U.S. Young Adults.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 44(4): 388–91. 4 King AB, Tynan MA, Dube SR, Arrazola R. Flavored-little cigar and flavored-cigarette use among U.S. middle and high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. September 17, 2013. 5 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.) Flavored Tobacco Product Sheet. 6 Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. (2009, December 14). The path to smoking addiction starts at very young ages. 7 King BA, Dube SR, and Tynan MA. 2013. “Flavored Cigar Smoking Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 15(2): 608–614; Nelson DE, Mowery P, Tomar S, et al. 2006. “Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Use Among Adults and Adolescents in the United States.” American Journal of Public Health. 96(5): 897– 905. 8 Report from R.M. Manko Assoc. to Lorillard Tobacco Co. (Aug. 1978) 9 David Weiss Associates. “The ‘Graduation Theory.’ November 16, 1984. Retrieved from http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ lfc46b00/pdf?search=%22graduation%20theory%22. Bates No. USSTC1945141-USSTC1945142 E-cigarette liquid, known as e-juice, comes in numerous youth-friendly flavors, such as the Pomberry, Psychedelic Peach and Fruit Stripe shown above. Shisha is the tobacco used in smoking hookah and is often flavored. WHAT DOES THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY HAVE TO SAY ABOUT FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS? The tobacco documents from the settlement revealed the “Graduation Theory,” a method used by the tobacco industry that aims to secure customer loyalty.9 This approach implies that new users start with milder tasting and flavored products. They graduate to full-bodied, less flavored items that often contain more nicotine and remain addicted for life. HOW DO FLAVORS IN TOBACCO PRODUCTS AFFECT YOUTH INITIATION AND ADDICTION? Nearly 90 percent of adult smokers began smoking in their teens.6 The flavoring in these products makes it easier for new, young users to take up tobacco, because the flavoring masks the harshness of the tobacco and enhances the user’s pleasure.7 The Association for Nonsmokers-Minnesota is dedicated to reducing the human and economic costs of tobacco use in Minnesota. (June, 2016) 2395 University Avenue W, Suite 310, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-646-3005 | www.ansrmn.org For more information visit www.iom.edu/TobaccoMinimumAge Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products Over the past 50 years, tobacco control in the United States has led to an esti- mated 8 million fewer premature deaths. However, tobacco use continues to significantly affect public health, and more than 40 million Americans still smoke. In 2009, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act granted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) broad authorities over tobacco products, though it prohibited FDA from establishing a nationwide minimum age of legal access—an MLA for tobacco products—above 18 years of age. It also directed FDA to convene a panel of experts to conduct a study on the public health implications of raising the minimum age to purchase tobacco products. At FDA’s request, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) convened a com- mittee in 2013 for this purpose. In the resulting report, Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products, the committee of experts reviews existing literature on tobacco use initiation, developmental biology and psy- chology, and tobacco policy and predicts the likely public health outcomes of raising the MLA for tobacco products to 19 years, 21 years, and 25 years. The committee also uses mathematical modeling to quantify these predictions. Of note, the report contains only conclusions regarding raising the MLA; as requested by FDA, the committee does not offer recommendations as to whether the MLA should be raised. ...tobacco use continues to significantly affect public health, and more than 40 million Americans still smoke. REPORT BRIEF  MARCH 2015 2 Lowering Initiation Rates The initiation age of tobacco use is critical. Among adults who become daily smokers, approximately 90 percent report first use of cigarettes before reaching 19 years of age, and almost 100 percent report first use before age 26. As mentioned above, FDA cannot raise the MLA nationwide. However, states and localities can set a higher minimum age for their communities. Most states currently set the MLA at 18 years. Four states set it at 19 years, and several localities around the country have raised the minimum age to 21 years. Based on its review of the literature, the committee concludes that overall, increasing the MLA for tobacco products will likely prevent or delay initiation of tobacco use by adolescents and young adults. The age group most impacted will be those age 15 to 17 years. The committee also concludes that the impact of raising the MLA to 21 will likely be substantially higher than raising it to 19. However, the added effect of raising the MLA from 21 to 25 will likely be considerably less. The parts of the brain most responsible for decision making, impulse control, sensation seek- ing, and susceptibility to peer pressure continue to develop and change through young adulthood, and adolescent brains are uniquely vulnerable to the effects of nicotine. In addition, the majority of underage users rely on social sources—like family and friends—to get tobacco. Raising the MLA to 19 will therefore not have much of an effect on reducing the social sources of those in high school. Raising the MLA to 21 will mean that those who can legally obtain tobacco are less likely to be in the same social networks as high school students. In the same vein, increas- ing the MLA from 21 to 25 is not likely to achieve additional notable reductions in social sources for those under age 15. Reducing Prevalence, Decreasing Disease Delaying initiation rates will likely decrease the prevalence of tobacco users in the U.S. popula- tion. To quantify this decrease in both prevalence of tobacco users and in related health concerns FIGURE: Committee Estimates Regarding Effects on Initiation Rates NOTE: This figure was created using data from Table 7-2 in the report. 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%MLA 25 MLA 21 MLA 19 21-24 yrs19-20 yrs18 yrs15-17 yrsunder 15 yrs Age GroupDecrease in Initiation Rate100% 3 cent decrease if raised to 25. Given a decline in the initiation rates of tobacco use by adolescents and lower prevalence in the population, it follows that tobacco-related disease would also decrease in proportion to the reduction in tobacco use. It is generally known that smoking-related diseases like cancer and heart disease develop over decades, and there- fore, it could take many years to lower rates of these diseases; however, there could be imme- diate decreases in other tobacco-related health effects. The committee concludes that raising the MLA will likely immediately improve the health of adolescents and young adults by reducing the number of those with adverse physiological effects such as increased inflammation and impaired immune functioning caused by smoking, as these could potentially lead to negative health conse- quences, including increased hospitalizations and lessened capacity to heal wounds. Adverse maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes—includ- ing preterm births, low birth weight, and sudden infant death—will also probably decrease due to reduced tobacco exposure in mothers and infants. Raising the MLA will also lessen the population’s exposure to secondhand smoke and its associated health effects, both now and in the future. Over time, the committee concludes that rais- ing the MLA will likely lead to substantial reduc- tions in smoking-related mortality, though results from the models suggest that these results will not be observed for at least 30 years, assuming that the MLA increase occurs now. The CISNET model The parts of the brain most responsible for decision making, impulse control, sensation seeking, and susceptibility to peer pressure continue to develop and change through young adulthood, and adolescent brains are uniquely vulnerable to the effects of nicotine and nicotine addiction. that could be a result of raising the MLA, the com- mittee commissioned the use of two established and complementary tobacco simulation models, SimSmoke and the Cancer Intervention and Sur- veillance Modeling Network smoking population model (CISNET). In using the models, the committee employed all available evidence and expert judgment to project outcomes. The committee also had to make assumptions with important implications. The models only address cigarette smoking, but the committee expects the MLA and relative effects on initiation to apply to all tobacco prod- ucts. In addition, the models project the effects of raising the MLA on the United States as a whole and do not take into account existing variations in tobacco use—such as by race or socioeconomic status—initiation rates, and tobacco control activ- ities. In addition, the rapidly changing landscape of tobacco products—for example, e-cigarettes— provides unknowns and could affect the future of tobacco product use in ways that the committee was unable to anticipate due to lack of evidence. Based on the modeling and backed up by the literature review, the committee concludes that raising the minimum age of legal access to tobacco products in the United States, particularly to ages 21 and 25, will likely lead to a substantial reduc- tion in smoking prevalence. If the MLA were raised now, the models projected that by the time today’s teenagers were adults, there would be a 3 percent decrease in prevalence of tobacco use among those adults if the MLA were raised to 19, a 12 percent decrease if raised to 21, and a 16 per- The Institute of Medicine serves as adviser to the nation to improve health. Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policy makers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public. Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 TEL 202.334.2352 FAX 202.334.1412 www.iom.edu Committee on the Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age for Purchasing Tobacco Products Richard J. Bonnie (Chair) Harrison Foundation Professor of Medicine and Law, Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia Anthony J. Alberg Blatt Ness Distinguished Endowed Chair in Oncology, Professor, Public Health Sciences, Interim Director of Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina Regina Benjamin NOLA.com/Times Picayune Endowed Chair in Public Health Sciences, Xavier University, New Orleans Jonathan Caulkins Professor, Operations Research and Public Health Policy, Heinz College of Public Policy and Management, Operations Research Department, Carnegie Mellon University Bonnie Halpern-Felsher Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Director of Research, Associate Director of Adolescent Medicine Fellowship Program, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University Swannie Jett Executive Director, Florida Department of Health in Seminole County Harlan Juster Director, Bureau of Tobacco Control, New York State Department of Health Jonathan D. Klein Associate Executive Director, Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence for Children and Secondhand Smoke, American Academy of Pediatrics Paula M. Lantz Professor and Chair, Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University Robin Mermelstein Director of the Institute for Health Research and Policy, Professor of Psychology, Clinical Professor of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois, Chicago Rafael Meza Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan Patrick O’Malley Research Professor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Kimberly Thompson Professor of Preventive Medicine and Global Health, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, President, Kid Risk, Inc. Study Sponsor U.S. Food and Drug Administration Kathleen Stratton Study Director Leslie Y. Kwan Research Associate Bettina Ritter Research Assistant Anna Martin Senior Program Assistant Doris Romero Financial Associate Rose Marie Martinez Senior Board Director, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice Study Staff Theodore R. Holford Susan Dwight Bliss Professor of Public Health (Biostatistics) and Professor of Statistics, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University David T. Levy Professor, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center Maria Roditis Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Adolescent Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Consultants projected that if the MLA were raised now to 21 nationwide, there would be approximately 223,000 fewer premature deaths, 50,000 fewer deaths from lung cancer, and 4.2 million fewer years of life lost for those born between 2000 and 2019. Conclusion The public health impact of raising the MLA for tobacco products depends on the degree to which local and state governments change their poli- cies. These decisions will depend on each state’s or locality’s balance between personal interests and the privacy of young adults to make their own choices versus society’s legitimate concerns about protecting public health. The IOM committee makes conclusions about likely public health outcomes of raising the MLA for tobacco products. Overall, in the absence of transformative changes in the tobacco market, social norms and attitudes, or in the knowledge of patterns and causes of tobacco use, the committee is reasonably confident that raising the MLA will reduce tobacco use initiation, particularly among adolescents 15 to 17 years of age; improve the health of Americans across the lifespan; and save lives. F LOST PRODUCTIVITY HOW SMOKING COSTS BUSINESSES $3.19 billion in smoking-related health care expenditures is a staggering figure on its own. Yet it’s only part of the story. The 2017 Health Care Costs and Smoking in Minnesota report also reveals significant costs related to lost productivity. Each year, smoking costs Minnesota $4.3 billion in lost productivity. Lost productivity costs include the loss of regular earnings and the “replacement value” for unpaid work typically performed within the home. This figure factors in the years of life lost due to premature death, and is based on the 6,306 smoking-attributable adult deaths recorded in 2014. These 6,306 deaths represent people who are no longer able to work, earn money for their families, or contribute to their communities because of cigarette smoking. Tying a cost to these deaths shows the tangible economic impact of smoking in Minnesota. THE FINANCIAL IMPACT ON EMPLOYERS While premature deaths place an enormous burden on families and society, a 2012 study (not commissioned by Blue Cross) also demonstrated a significant financial impact on employers. The study estimated that on average, businesses spend an additional $5,816 annually per employee who smokes. These costs included excess absenteeism, lower productivity related to nicotine addiction, excess health care costs and lost productivity due to smoking breaks.1 $4.3 billion COULD ALSO PAY FOR: The ANNUAL UTILITY BILL for 282,152 MEDIUM BUSINESSES ($1,270/MONTH OR $15,240/YEAR FOR A MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESS) OFFICE SUPPLIES for 4.3 MILLION SMALL BUSINESSES with five employees ($200 PER EMPLOYEE PER YEAR)3 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT for 5.28 MILLION EMPLOYEES ($814 PER EMPLOYEE PER YEAR)5 IT SPENDING for 434,343 EMPLOYEES ($9,900 AVERAGE IT SPENDING PER EMPLOYEE PER YEAR)4 2 NOTES 1. Berman M., et al. “Estimating the Cost of a Smoking Employee,” Tobacco Control 23 (2014), 428–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050888 2. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. “Typical Monthly Electric Bill for Medium Size Businesses, 2015.” https://mn.gov/deed/data/data-tools/compare-mn/energy/electric.jsp 3. LAC Group. “Average Office Supply Costs per Employee.” https://lac-group.com/average-office-supply-costs-per-employee/ 4. McCarthy, Shawn P. “‘Per Employee’ IT Spending: Federal Government Is Nearly Four Times the Industry Average,” IDC Community, 8/17/16 https://idc-community.com/government/smart_government/per_employee_it_spending_federal_government_is_nearly_four_times_the 5. Training Magazine. “2016 Training Industry Report.” https://trainingmag.com/sites/default/files/images/Training_Industry_Report_2016.pdf * Under the Affordable Care Act, most plans must treat tobacco cessation as a preventive service. That does not include grandfathered health plans, such as certain plans that were in existence before March 2010 and have not made significant changes since. (American Lung Association website, lung.org/ our-initiatives/tobacco/cessation-and-prevention/tobacco- cessation-treatment-what-is-covered.html) # Additionally, many Minnesota health plans, including Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, offer telephonic tobacco-cessation coaching as a separate program outside of preventive health benefits. Those without health plan coverage can also get help quitting tobacco through QUITPLAN® Services (quitplan.com). Tobacco in this document refers specifically to the use of manufactured, commercial tobacco products and not to the sacred, medicinal and traditional use of tobacco by American Indians and other groups. Blue Cross® and Blue Shield® of Minnesota and Blue Plus® are nonprofit independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. ADDING UP THE NUMBERS In total, nearly $7.5 billion in excess health care costs and lost productivity cost can be attributed to smoking on an annual basis. This is an alarming figure. It highlights the urgency of the efforts to continue driving down Minnesota’s smoking rate. It also represents a call to action to employers, government agencies and all Minnesotans. WHAT YOU CAN DO ➜➜Support policies that reduce commercial tobacco use. Consider including policies such as keeping tobacco prices high or requesting more tobacco prevention funding in your state policy agenda. ➜➜Talk to people in your community. Find out what your neighbors and fellow community members know about the burdens smoking puts on our state. ➜➜Encourage your employees who smoke to quit. Smoking cessation is often covered as a preventive benefit in employer-sponsored health plans. This means it is available at no additional cost to your employees, other than the premium they are already paying.*# X21749 (04/17) Together, we can make a difference in reducing the burden smoking puts on your bottom line and our state. Many people choose menthol cigarettes because they believe they are safer than non-menthol cigarettes. They are not. The tobacco industry has marketed menthol cigarettes as healthier and safer, but they are just as deadly. Studies have shown that the tobacco industry has manipulated menthol levels to broaden youth appeal. Menthol cigarettes cause cancer, heart and lung diseases, and death. Tobacco use, including menthol-flavored products, is still the No. 1 preventable cause of death in Minnesota. Easier to start, harder to quit. Tobacco companies add menthol to tobacco products to cool the throat and make them taste better. ABOUT MENTHOL 88%African Americans: of African American adults who smoke use menthol, compared to 25% of adult smokers overall. MENTHOL USE IN MINNESOTA HARMFUL EFFECTS OF MENTHOL of adult LGBTQ smokers smoke menthol cigarettes. 36% of LGBTQ youth smokers smoke menthols. 70%High School Students: LGBTQ Youth & Adults: 44% of Minnesota high school students who smoke use menthol. Use of menthol cigarettes among Minnesota high school smokers more than doubled since 2000. What can we do to stop the tobacco industry from harming our communities with menthol tobacco? Minnesota communities have the authority to regulate the sale of menthol tobacco products, which will help protect youth from a lifetime of addiction. Minneapolis and Saint Paul already prohibit the sale of fruit and candy-flavored tobacco products in any store that allows children to enter. The same needs to be done for menthol. Brands such as Salem and Newport would give out free packs of menthol cigarettes from vans. Tobacco industry documents show these vans targeted young, lower-income, black smokers at “retail outlets, currency exchanges/check cashing stations, public aid offices, large housing complexes, shopping malls, rapid transit locations, busy street corners, and nightclubs/bars.” — RJ Reynolds, 1989 Tobacco companies began heavily targeting African Americans with menthol cigarettes in the 1960s. TAKE ACTION Join us at: BeautifulLieUglyTruth.org “…the base of our business is the high school student.” — Lorillard (Makers of Newport), 1978 AND NOW, A MESSAGE FROM TOBACCO EXECUTIVES INDUSTRY MANIPULATION: The tobacco industry has a long history of targeting the African American community, women, LGBTQ, and youth with menthol tobacco marketing. “We don’t smoke that s***. We just sell it. We reserve the right to smoke for the young, the poor, the black and stupid.” — RJ Reynolds Executive, 1971 References available at: BeautifulLieUglyTruth.org (July 2016) Clinical AND Health Affairs JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | 35 Raising the Minimum Legal Sale Age for Tobacco to 21 The Estimated Effect for Minnesota BY RAYMOND G. BOYLE, PHD, JOHN H. KINGSBURY, PHD, AND MICHAEL J. PARKS, PHD A campaign to raise the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products from 18 to 21 years known as Tobacco 21 is having a nationwide impact, with at least 200 localities in 14 states having already implemented a Tobacco 21 policy. A 2015 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimated the effects of such policy on cigarette use at the national level; however, little is known about the expected effects for individual states. The purpose of this study was to consider the effect on smoking initiation in Minnesota if the minimum sale age were 21 in 2015. Estimates from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort and Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey were used to calculate the uptake of smoking in a hypothetical cohort of Minnesota adolescents 15 to 20 years of age. Expected reductions in initiation in the IOM report were used to calculate the effects of Tobacco 21 policy on smoking uptake in this cohort. Results revealed that raising the sale age to 21 in 2015 would prevent 3,355 young Minnesotans from starting to smoke. Minnesota addresses tobacco use through a comprehensive ap- proach that includes coordinating smoke-free policies, promoting norma- tive changes in the social acceptability of tobacco use, establishing and expanding the reach of cessation programs, keeping the price of tobacco high and preventing young people from initiating tobacco use. The overall effect of these actions has been a 35% reduction in cigarette smoking in Minnesota since 1999;1 however, tobacco use remains popular among young adults in Minnesota and nationally.1,2 The persistence of tobacco use among young adults, coupled with an evolving marketplace that includes new flavored products (eg, flavored cigars and cigaril- los) and new delivery methods (eg, elec- tronic cigarettes), has led to a desire for increased regulation of tobacco. In 2009 the U.S. Congress granted authority to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to regulate the manufacture, distribution and marketing of tobacco products.3 Although this law prohibited the FDA from increasing beyond age 18 the na- tional minimum sale age for tobacco prod- ucts, state and local governments are able to raise the minimum sale age for tobacco. In addition, the law required a study of the health implications of a higher minimum age of legal access. The Institute of Medi- cine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, conducted the study using national data to consider the effects of dif- ferent minimum purchase ages (19, 21 or 25 years) and examine multiple outcomes, including preventing young people from starting and encouraging current smokers to quit smoking, and the health benefits from reduced smoking because of an in- creased purchase age. Nationally, increas- ing the purchase age to 21 would result in approximately 223,000 fewer premature deaths and 50,000 fewer deaths from lung cancer.4 Adolescents younger than age 18 fre- quently obtain tobacco from social sources who are older than 18 but younger than 21.5 If tobacco could not be sold to 18- to 20-year-olds, they would be far less likely to provide tobacco to younger teens. By age 21, young adults are likely to have friends older than high-school age and, therefore, less likely to provide tobacco to minors. The IOM’s 2015 report is particularly important because it provides scientific guidance for state and local governments as they seek to protect public health. Al- though the report provided novel informa- tion on the expected effects of Tobacco 21 policy on a national level, it provided little Clinical AND Health Affairs 36 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 in other places. For example, in New York City, compliance has fallen over time after Tobacco 21 policy was implemented.10 Calculation: In this analysis, we began with a cohort of Minnesota 15-year-olds in 2015–approximately 72,000. We esti- mated the smoking initiation rate in two periods: during high school (ages 15 to 17 years) and after high school (ages 18 to 20 years). Next, the reduction in smoking was calculated for each period if the sale age for tobacco were raised to 21 in 2015. We assumed that the smoking uptake in high school and after high school would not change in future years. The difference is reported as the number of young people 15 to 20 years of age who would not have started smoking. Results In 2015, the Minnesota population of those 15-year-olds was approximately 72,000. Of these, an estimated 7,200 will start smoking during their high school years. If the minimum legal sale age in 2015 were 21, an estimated 1,800 would not start smoking in high school. tion, the expected reduction in smoking initiation is thought to vary by age. The ef- fect is expected to be larger among youth 15 to 17 years of age, with an expected re- duction in the uptake of smoking of 25%. Among those 18 to 20 years of age, the expected reduction is 15%.4 Variation by demographic variables: Smoking rates vary substantially by popu- lation groups in Minnesota. For example, in 2014 the overall adult smoking rate was about 14%,1 but within the urban Ameri- can Indian population the smoking rate was 59%.8 There is a lack of literature on how smoking initiation would be affected in population groups with higher smoking rates if the sale age were increased. Thus, the estimate here is not adjusted by gender or other demographic variables (eg, race/ ethnicity, income). Enforcement: States are required to enact and enforce laws prohibiting the sale or distribution of tobacco products to in- dividuals younger than 18 years of age. A major assumption of Tobacco 21 policy is that the same level of current enforcement and retailer compliance would remain in effect. Although Minnesota has a high rate of retailer compliance with current law,9 retailer cooperation has been lower information about the expected effects at a state level. The purpose of this study was to con- sider the effects on smoking initiation in Minnesota if the legal minimum sale age for tobacco products were 21. The specific goal was to calculate how many young people ages 15 to 20 years would not start smoking if the assumptions from the IOM report were applied to Minnesota. Methods and Assumptions Age groups: The 2015 IOM report exam- ined effects among specific age groups: under 15 years, 15- to 17-year-olds and 18- to 20-year-olds. In this analysis, we limited the consideration to ages 15 and older. Initiation rate: Cohort studies that fol- low participants over time provide the best estimates of smoking initiation. The Min- nesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) study was a population-based study of Minnesota youth ages 12 to 16 in 2000 who were followed until 2008. In 2003, approximately 19% of the cohort reported smoking in the previous month.6 Smoking among Minnesota high school students has fallen to about 10% since 2003. Therefore, in this analysis we used 10% as the estimate of smoking initiation among youth 15 to 17 years of age. In a later analysis of the MACC data, 16% of the cohort who did not start smoking in high school took up smoking (smoked in the past month) between the ages of 18 and 21.7 This estimate of smok- ing uptake is consistent with the preva- lence of smoking among young adults in the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey. For this analysis we used 16% as the estimate of 18- to 20-year-olds who would initiate smoking. Estimated effects of Tobacco 21 policy: An increase in the minimum sale age is expected to apply to all commercial to- bacco products; however, for the purpose of estimating effects similar to those in the IOM report, the scope of this study was restricted to cigarette smoking. In addi- COHORT AGE (YEARS) NUMBER WHO HAVE NOT SMOKED PROPORTION WHO START SMOKING NUMBER SMOKING NUMBER NOT SMOKING IF POLICY WERE IN EFFECT 15 72,000 16 to 17 64,800 10% 7,200 1,800 18 to 20 54,432 16% 10,368 1,555 FIGURE Estimated Reduction in Youth Smokers with Implementation of Tobacco 21 Policy NUMBER OF YOUTHAges 15 to 17 years WITHOUT TOBACCO 21 POLICY WITH TOBACCO 21 POLICY Ages 18 to 20 years 7,200 17,568 5,400 8,813 14,213 Combined Total AGE GROUPS AFFECTED BY TOBACCO 21 POLICY TOTAL: 3,355Note: The cohort size is 1/5 of the census estimate of Minnesota 15- to 19-year-olds in 2015. 10,368 Clinical AND Health Affairs JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | 37 3. Mitka M. FDA exercises new authority to regulate tobacco products, but some limits remain. JAMA. 2009;302(19):2078, 2080-1. 4. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. 5. Lenk KM, Toomey TL, Shi Q, Erickson D, Forester JL. Do sources of cigarettes among adolescents vary by age over time? J Child and Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2014;23(2):137-143. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 1992, and changes in the definition of current cigarette smoking. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(19):342–6. 7. Bernat DH, Klein EG, Forester JL. Smoking initia- tion during young adulthood: A longitudinal study of a population-based cohort. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(5):497-502. 8. Forster J, Poupart J, Rhodes K, et al. Cigarette smoking among urban American Indian adults — Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(21):534–7. 9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Tobacco sales to youth. Available at: http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SYNAR-14/ SYNAR-14.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2016. 10. Silver D, Macinko J, Giorgio M, Bae JY, Jimenez G. Retailer compliance with tobacco control laws in New York City before and after raising the minimum legal purchase age to 21. Tob Control. 2015 Nov 19. pii: tobaccocontrol-2015-052547. [Epub ahead of print] 11. Increasing the Sale Age for Tobacco Products to 21. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Available at: www.tobaccofreekids.org/what_we_do/state_local/ sales_21. Accessed October 1, 2016. 12. Farley SM, Coady MH, Mandel-Ricci J, et al. Public opinions on tax and retail-based tobacco control strat- egies. Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e10-3. 13. Winickoff JP, McMillen R, Tanski S, Wilson K, Gottlieb M, Crane R. Public support for raising the age of sale for tobacco to 21 in the United States. Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):284-8. 14. King BA, Jama AO, Marynak KL, Promoff GR. Attitudes toward raising the minimum age of sale for tobacco among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(4):583-8. 15. Vuolo M, Kelly BC, Kadowaki J. Independent and interactive effects of smoking bans and tobacco taxes on a cohort of US young adults. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(2):374–80. 16. Gielen AC, Green LW. The impact of policy, envi- ronmental, and educational interventions: a synthesis of the evidence from two public health success sto- ries. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1S):20S-34S. strongly to smoking bans than to other types of tobacco control15 in part because a ban is an unambiguous anti-tobacco message that indirectly influences social norms, creating a social environment that discourages health-risk behavior.16 Put differently, the effects of Tobacco 21 policy would extend into the future as new cohorts of young people do not start using tobacco. Our analysis considered only cigarette smoking; but a Tobacco 21 policy would apply to all tobacco products. Whether the effects of raising the purchasing age to 21 would be similar across all demographic and racial/ethnic groups is not known. Similar to the IOM, we did not adjust the Minnesota estimate for any variation by demographics other than age. This ques- tion should be examined when there is sufficient data on communities that have implemented the policy. Conclusion Raising the minimum sale age for tobacco to 21 would prevent the uptake of smoking among youth and young adults, subse- quently reducing smoking prevalence over time. Applying national estimates from the 2015 IOM report to Minnesota, we found that implementing a Tobacco 21 policy could have a marked impact on smok- ing initiation among Minnesota’s young people. Tobacco 21 should be considered an effective strategy for reducing smok- ing initiation. Preventing smoking among youth remains a primary focus for reduc- ing morbidity and mortality as well as pro- moting health across the lifespan. MM Raymond Boyle is director of research programs for ClearWay Minnesota. John Kingsbury and Michael Parks are research scientists for the Minnesota Department of Health. REFERENCES 1. Boyle RG, Amato MS, Rode P, Kinney AM, St. Claire AW, Taylor K. Tobacco use among Minnesota adults, 2014. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(5):674-9. 2. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2015: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. 2016. Available at: www.monitoringthefu- ture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2015.pdf. Accessed September 3, 2016. Of those who finished high school with- out initiating smoking, 10,368 will begin smoking between ages 18 and 21. Under a Tobacco 21 policy, 1,555 fewer young peo- ple would start smoking after high school. Overall, 3,355 fewer young people would start smoking in this cohort of youth if a Tobacco 21 policy were in effect (see Fig- ure). In other words, increasing the sale age to 21 would increase the proportion of nonsmokers in a cohort of 15-year-olds from 76% to 80%. Discussion Increasing the sale age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21 would have a posi- tive effect on Minnesota, where tobacco use remains popular among young adults.1 Given that almost 95% of smokers start smoking by age 21, raising the age of sale to 21 years would prevent the vast majority of young people from becoming addicted to the nicotine in tobacco. At least 200 localities in 14 states have raised the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21 years.11 Notably, Hawaii was the first state (2015) followed by California (2016), and New York City (2013) is the largest city to adopt a To- bacco 21 policy. This policy has broad support and is viewed positively by both smokers and nonsmokers. In New York City, 60% of smokers and 69% of non- smokers have supported the age increase.12 In a national sample of adults, 70.5% sup- ported the increase.13 And in an online survey, 77.5% of never smokers and 70% of current smokers either strongly favored or somewhat favored raising the legal pur- chasing age to 21.14 We acknowledge that some young people will begin using tobacco at a later age. The amount is unknown; but even if 5% eventually take up smoking, this would not diminish the overall effect of Tobacco 21 policy. In addition, while we have highlighted how Tobacco 21 would inhibit more than 3,300 youth from initiating smoking, it is important to note the policy could have additional and more indirect benefits. Youth tend to respond more Increasing the Tobacco Sale Age to 21 The tobacco industry heavily targets young adults ages 18-21 in order to recruit new tobacco users and guarantee profits. Approximately 95 percent of current adult smokers started before they were 21.1 In Minnesota, no one under 18 years old is allowed to buy tobacco. Youth get tobacco from several sources, including social sources. A 16-year-old has more contact with and access to 18-year-olds who can buy tobacco. However, it is less likely a 16-year-old would ask a 21-year-old for tobacco. Increasing the age gap between young people and those who can legally buy tobacco will reduce youth access to tobacco. WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF NICOTINE ON ADOLESCENT BRAIN DEVELOPMENT? Nicotine is harmful to the development of the adolescent brain. WHY RAISE THE TOBACCO SALE AGE? WHO SUPPORTS RAISING THE TOBACCO SALE AGE TO 21? A 2014 national survey shows that 75 percent of adults favor increasing the minimum sale age for tobacco to 21. A national consensus is growing to protect young people from a lifetime of addiction and health problems caused by tobacco by raising the tobacco sale age. In addition, 70 percent of current smokers and 65 percent of those age 18-24 support raising the minimum tobacco sale age.9 Nicotine is addictive and is particularly harmful to the developing adolescent brain. Evidence suggests that nicotine interferes with brain maturation and can have a long-term effect on cognitive development and mental health.4 Even brief or intermittent nicotine exposure during adolescence can cause lasting damage.5 3 out of 4 adults favor increasing the sale age for tobacco to 21. A 2015 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found that increasing the legal age to purchase tobacco to 21 would decrease smoking initiation among 15-17-year-olds by 25 percent.2 A Minnesota-specific study looked at the impact of raising the tobacco age and found that 25 percent fewer 15-year-olds would start smoking by the time they turn 18 and 15 percent fewer 18-year-olds would start smoking by the time they turn 18. This translates into 30,000 young people not becoming smokers over the next 15 years.3 If youth don't smoke by the time they are 21, they likely never will. The addictive properties of nicotine can lead adolescents to heavier daily tobacco use and a more difficult time quitting later in life.6 Nicotine exposure can also increase the risk of addiction to other harmful substances.5 The long-term effects of nicotine on the adolescent brain is a significant public health concern.7,8 WHAT CAN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DO? California, Hawaii, New Jersey, Maine, Oregon and Massachusetts, along with a growing list of more than 300 cities in the United states, have raised the tobacco sales age to 21. Edina, Saint Louis Park, Bloomington, Plymouth, North Mankato, Falcon Heights, Shoreview, Minneapolis, Saint Peter, Richfield and Roseville have raised the age in Minnesota. Needham, Mass., raised the legal tobacco sales age to 21 in 2005. Within five years, tobacco use among high school students decreased by nearly half.11 IS YOUTH TOBACCO USE STILL A PROBLEM? The percent of students who smoke cigarettes is declining, but the 2016 Minnesota Student Survey found that 9th and 11th graders in Minnesota are now using e-cigarettes at twice the rate of regular cigarettes.10 Increasing the sale age to 21 would reduce youth access to all harmful tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, cigars and hookah. The Association for Nonsmokers-Minnesota is dedicated to reducing the human and economic costs of tobacco use in Minnesota. 2395 University Avenue W, Suite 310, St. Paul, MN 55114 | 651-646-3005 | www.ansrmn.org SOURCES "Raising the legal minimum age for cigarette purchaser to 21 could gut our young adult market where we sell about 25 billion cigarettes and enjoy a 70 percent market share." Philip Morris report, 1986 California, Hawaii, New Jersey, Maine, Oregon and Massachusetts raised the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21 since 2016. More than 300 localities in the United States have raised the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21. Some organizations who support raising tobacco sale age to 21 include: • American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network • American Heart Association • American Lung Association • ClearWay MinnesotaSM • Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians • Service Employees International Union Minnesota State Council 1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National 2 Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2012. 2 Institute of Medicine. Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. National Academy Press. 2015. 3 Boyle, R., Kingsbury, J. & Parks, M. Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age for Tobacco to 21. Minnesota Medicine. 2017. 4 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2014. 5 Goriounova, N., Mansvelder, H. Nicotine exposure during adolescence alters the rules for prefrontal cortical synaptic plasticity during adulthood. Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience. 2012. 6 Nelson, D. et al. Long-term trends in adolescent and young adult smoking in the United States: metapatterns and implications. Am J Public Health. 2008. 7 Abreu-Villaca, Y et al. Short-term adolescent nicotine exposure has immediate and persistent effects on cholinergic systems: critical periods, patterns of exposure, dose thresholds. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003. 8 Slikker W Jr. et al. Mode of action: disruption of brain cell replication, second messenger, and neurotransmitter systems during development leading to cognitive dysfunction—developmental neurotoxicity of nicotine. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005. 9 King BA et al. Attitudes Toward Raising the Minimum Age of Sale for Tobacco Among U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015. 10 Minnesota Student Survey Data. Minnesota Department of Health. 2016; http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/dse/health/mss/. Accessed November 22, 2016. 11 Kessed Schneider S et al. Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21. Tob Control. 2015. (August 2018) Key: Statewide law Number of cities within the state that have passed age 21 policies 1400 I Street NW · Suite 1200 · Washington, DC 20005 Phone (202) 296-5469 · Fax (202) 296-5427 · www.tobaccofreekids.org Research shows that youth access laws successfully reduce youth tobacco use when they are well enforced and disrupt the sale of tobacco products to minors.1 Today, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have laws that restrict the sale of tobacco products to minors. But in addition to restricting the sale, 45 states and the District of Columbia have laws that also prohibit the purchase and/or underage possession (PUP) of tobacco products by minors. Penalties for youth who violate a PUP law typically include a fine but may also include other penalties like community service, attending mandatory smoking education or cessation programs, or the suspension of a driver’s license or permit.2 Only five states— Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, and New York—do not have PUP laws.3 Some states passed PUP laws with the intention of reducing youth smoking by making kids more personally responsible for buying and using tobacco products. Penalizing children, however, has not been proven to be an effective strategy for reducing youth smoking; and some experts argue that PUP laws could actually detract from more effective enforcement measures and tobacco control efforts.4 PUP laws also unfairly punish and stigmatize children, many of whom became addicted at a young age as a result of the tobacco industry’s aggressive marketing to kids. In this way, PUP laws shift the blame from the industry’s irresponsible marketing to its victims. Penalties against youth become even more unreasonable when little is done to counter the tobacco industry’s targeted marketing to kids. Rather than treat children as the wrongdoers, youth access laws should focus on limiting access to tobacco products by conducting ongoing retailer compliance checks with strong penalties for sales to minors. Additional Concerns about PUP Laws  Penalizing youth can divert enforcement officials’ attention from stopping retailers from illegally selling tobacco to kids in the first place. PUP laws are more difficult to systematically enforce than sanctions against retailers, especially since PUP laws rarely provide additional enforcement resources. It is easier and more effective to conduct compliance checks for retailers, who are fewer in number compared to youth and whose locations are both known and constant.5  The ease of discretely possessing and using some tobacco products makes PUP laws more challenging to enforce than laws restricting sales to minors. Similarly, the perceived risk among youth of getting caught and punished is likely too low to have a meaningful impact on deterring tobacco use. In fact, there is little evidence showing that PUP laws have been enforced well enough to reduce youth smoking.6  Tobacco companies and their allies have a history of supporting PUP laws as alternatives to other laws that would produce greater declines in youth smoking, such as increasing the price of cigarettes. Tobacco companies have also promoted the passage of PUP laws in order to get additional provisions enacted that make implementing or enforcing additional tobacco control measures more difficult (e.g., preemption of strong local laws/ordinances).7  Despite the fact that many youth smokers are addicted, making it difficult for them to quit, few PUP laws include provisions ensuring that quit smoking resources are made available to them. Some research even suggests that penalizing youth could deter them from seeking support for cessation.8 Promoting interventions that provide cessation resources for youth interested in quitting could be a more beneficial alternative. Youth Access Laws Should Emphasize Restricting Sales to Minors Youth access laws that restrict sales to minors are better supported by research as a way to reduce youth smoking than laws that focus primarily on penalizing youth for purchase or possession of tobacco. While YOUTH ACCESS LAWS THAT PENALIZE KIDS FOR PURCHASE OR UNDERAGE POSSESSION ARE NOT PROVEN TO REDUCE TOBACCO USE PUP Laws Are Not Proven to Reduce Tobacco Use / 2 PUP laws may have some potential if combined with laws banning sales to minors, evidence of their effectiveness still is lacking, and many concerns about how to effectively implement them remain. Regardless of whether a state chooses to implement PUP provisions as part of its youth access law, rigorous enforcement of restrictions against sales to minors is critical to minimizing the accessibility of tobacco products and, ultimately, reducing youth tobacco use. The most successful youth access programs incorporate routine retailer compliance checks which use minors to make attempted tobacco purchases.9 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, November 18, 2014 / Lorna Schmidt 1 DiFranza, JR, “Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?” Tobacco Control, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145, published online first October 12, 2011. 2 American Lung Association, State Legislated Action on Tobacco Issues, 2014. 3 American Lung Association, State Legislated Action on Tobacco Issues, 2014. 4 Wakefield, M, and Giovino, G, “Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues,” Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl I):i6-i13, 2003; Jason, LA, et al., “Youth Tobacco Sales-to-Minors and Possession-Use-Purchase Laws: A Public Health Controversy,” J Drug Education, 35(4):275-290, 2005. 5 Wakefield, M, and Giovino, G, “Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues,” Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl I):i6-i13, 2003. 6 Wakefield, M, and Giovino, G, “Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues,” Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl I):i6-i13, 2003. 7 Wakefield, M, and Giovino, G, “Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues,” Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl I):i6-i13, 2003. 8 Hrywna, M, et al., “Content Analysis and Key Informant Interviews to Examine Community Response to the Purchase, Possession, and/or Use of Tobacco by Minors,” J Comm Health, 29(3):209-216, 2004; Wakefield, M, and Giovino, G, “Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues,” Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl I):i6-i13, 2003; Loukas, A, et al., “Examining the Perspectives of Texas Minors Cited for Possession of Tobacco,” Health Promotion Practice, 7(2):197-205, 2006. 9 DiFranza, JR, “Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?” Tobacco Control, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145, published online first October 12, 2011. DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Vegetation Removal and Clear Cutting Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should provide further direction on the moving forward with potential regulations regarding vegetation removal and clear cutting. Background The City Attorney will be providing information regarding vegetation removal and clear cutting. Attachment Attachment A: Draft Ordinance AGENDA ITEM –1B MEMORANDUM 1 198575v4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-___ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, SECTION 710 – TREES AND VEGETATION, CHAPTER 13, SECTIONS 1305 – RULES, SCOPE, INTERPRETATION, & DEFINITIONS, AND 1325- GENERAL REGULATIONS, AND CHAPTER 15, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL OF THE ARDEN HILLS CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 7 – Recreation Areas, Section 710 – Trees and Vegetation, is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: Chapter 7 – Recreation Areas Section 710 – Trees and Vegetation 710.12.1 Protection of Shade Trees Subd. 1 Declaration of Policy. The City Council has determined that the health of oak, elm, and ash trees, hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "shade trees," within the municipal limits are threatened by fatal tree diseases, and insect infestations commonly known as "Oak Wilt Disease", "Dutch Elm Disease", and "Emerald Ash Borer" respectively, hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "shade tree diseases." It has further determined that the loss of shade trees growing upon public and private property would substantially depreciate the value of property within the City and impair the safety, good order, general welfare and convenience of the public. Accordingly, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to control and prevent the spread of shade tree diseases and other epidemic diseases, by enacting this subsection for that purpose. Subd. 2 Penalties. Any person violating the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both, not to exceed the maximums provided by state law for a misdemeanor. Each day following the date on which the person was to have removed any diseased shade tree or wood as specified in written notice given pursuant to the provisions of this subsection, the person has allowed the tree to remain on his or her property, or has allowed the parts or brush there from to remain on his or her property, shall constitute a separate violation. Subd. 3 Forester. The position of city forester is hereby continued and the powers and duties of the officer are hereby conferred upon the person as designated from time to time by the 2 198575v4 Mayor with the concurrence of the Council. It shall be the duty of the forester to coordinate, under the direction and control of the Council, all activities of the City relating to the control and prevention of shade tree diseases. He or she shall recommend to the Council the details of a program for the control and prevention of the diseases and perform the duties incident to such a program as adopted by the Council. Inspections may be performed by a designated tree inspector(s). Subd. 4. Interference Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to prevent, delay or interfere with the forester or his or her tree inspector(s) or designee while they are engaged in the performance of duties imposed by this subsection. Subd. 5. Epidemic Disease Program. It is the intention of the City Council to conduct a program of pest control pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota statues section 18G.13, as amended, directed at the control and elimination of Dutch elm disease, Ooak wilt disease, Emerald Ash Borer infestation, and elimination of other tree diseases and insect infestations and is undertaken at the recommendation of the Minnesota Commissioner of Agriculture. Subd. 6. Shade Tree Nuisances Declared. A. The following are hereby declared to be public nuisances whenever and wherever they may be found within the City: 1. Any elm tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the Dutch elm disease fungus Ceratocystis Ulmi (Buisman) Moreau or which harbors any of the elm bark beetles Scolytus Multistriatus (Marsham) or Hylurgopinus Rufipes (Eichhoff); 2. Any dead elm tree or part thereof, including stems, branches, stumps, firewood or other elm material from which the bark has not been removed and burned or sprayed with an effective elm bark beetle insecticide; and 3. Any northern red oak (Quercus rubra, Quercus ellipsoidalis, and Q. palustris), or part thereof, infected to any degree with the oakwilt disease, Ceratocystis fagacearum. 4. Any living or standing white oak (Quercus alba), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), and swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor), that poses a threat of transmission of the oak wilt disease to other trees. 5. Red oak species deemed by the City forester or designated tree inspector to be a potentially diseased spore producing tree (PSPT) must be removed before March 15th of the year following complete tree wilt. Any removed red oak tree should be disposed of at an approved wood utilization site or properly treated, i.e. main stems cut into firewood length sections, split if appropriate, stacked and covered in clear plastic with the edges sealed at the ground line to prevent vector entry or escape. 6. Any Ash tree infested with the Emerald Ash Borer beetle, Agrilus Planipennis. 7. Other shade trees with epidemic diseases or epidemic insect infestations. 3 198575v4 Subd. 7. Shade Tree Nuisances Prohibited. (amended 11/28/11) It is unlawful for any person to permit the spread of a public nuisance as defined in this chapter across his or her property lines in any specified control areas as established by the city. Such nuisances shall be abated in a manner prescribed in this chapter. Subd. 8. Inspection by Certified Tree Inspector. A. The forester shall engage one or more persons, each of whom shall have been issued a certificate from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture pursuant to M.S. § 89.63, as amended from time to time, certifying that he or she is a qualified or certified tree inspector, for the purposes of inspecting any public or private properties, upon prior notification, to detect shade trees harboring shade tree diseases, which inspector(s) shall act as the duly authorized agent(s) of the forester. Nothing herein shall preclude the forester from being certified by the State Department of Agriculture as a qualified tree inspector and acting as such on behalf of the City. B. The tree inspector(s) shall inspect all premises and places, both public and private, within the City as often as is practicable to detect and mark the location of all shade trees infected with shade tree diseases and report the results of the inspections to the forester immediately after each inspection has been conducted. The forester, or the tree inspector(s), may send appropriate specimens or samples to the State Department of Agriculture for analysis, or take such other steps for diagnosis as may be recommended by the Department. In addition to the foregoing inspections, it shall be the duty of the tree inspector(s) to investigate all reported incidents of infestation by Dutch elm fungus, elm bark beetles, emerald ash borer or any other manifestations of shade tree diseases. C. A property owner or contractor who becomes aware of any tree infestation within the City shall notify the City Forester within seven (7) days. D. The City forester and tree inspector(s) shall have the right to enter upon all private premises within the City at any reasonable time for the purpose of carrying out the duties assigned to them under this subsection, including inspection, treatment, cutting, burning or removing of diseased shade trees. Subd. 9. Notices to Property Owners. A. After each inspection and investigation, whenever the forester or the tree inspector(s) has found with a reasonable certainty that a shade tree or any wood that harbors shade tree disease to such an extent that the same constitutes a threat of infestation of shade trees in proximity thereto, the tree inspector(s) shall mark the diseased shade trees or wood or both, as the case may be, in a visible manner and notify each owner of real estate within the City whereon the diseased shade trees or wood, or both as the case may be, are located, which notice shall contain the inspection information with respect to the diseased shade trees upon the property and shall further advise that, in accordance with the provisions of this subsection, the owner is 4 198575v4 required to remove the trees or wood, or both, as the case may be, within (20) (amended 11/28/11) days for elm and ash trees and (30) days for oak trees and other trees species from the date of the letter being sent to the property owner. The notices shall be sent by certified mail with return receipt requested to the last known address of the owner. In the event that the certified mail is not delivered, mailing by ordinary mail to the address shall be deemed sufficient notice. B. The notices to be sent under the provisions of this subdivision shall be sent to the occupant of premises upon which the diseased shade trees or wood, or both as the case may be, are located, if those premises are occupied, and also to the owner of the premises, if the owner has an address different from the subject premises and the address is disclosed by the records of the county department of property taxation. Reasonable inquiry by the forester or the tree inspector(s) shall be sufficient to meet this requirement, and telephone inquiry of the office of the county department of property taxation shall be deemed reasonable inquiry for the purpose of ascertaining the addresses. If the subject premises are unoccupied, then mailing to the address of the owner as shown by the records of the county department of property taxation shall be deemed sufficient. C. No person shall allow, permit the spread of, or fail to abate a public nuisance as defined in this code. Such nuisances shall be abated in the manner prescribed in this code. Subd. 10. Removal of Diseased Shade Trees. A. An owner of real estate in the City who is notified of the existence on his or her property of shade trees or wood therefrom, or both as the case may be, harboring shade tree disease shall within the time specified in the written notice cut down or have cut down each of the diseased trees, remove or have removed all parts, branches and brush there from, and transport or have transported all the parts, branches and brush from the diseased trees and any diseased wood from the premises to an authorized disposal or chipping site. With respect to the transportation of wood from diseased elms or ash trees, it shall be unlawful for any person to transport within the City any bark bearing elm or ash wood. B. The City Forester shall enforce the treatment of nuisance by requiring the performance of one or more of the following disease control methods listed in subsection C in order to destroy and prevent the spread of epidemic diseased of shade trees, including, but not limited to, Dutch elm disease, emerald ash borer, or oak wilt disease. Such abatement may be designated by the Minnesota Commissioner of Agriculture or the University of Minnesota. C. The following abatement procedures are recommended by the City of Arden Hills: 1. Root graft barrier installation at least 60 inches in the soil to isolate the diseased trees; 2. Removal of trees; 3. Stump grinding; 5 198575v4 4. Burning, chipping, debarking or properly covering and sealing the potentially hazardous wood and/or stumps. D. To prevent root graft transmission of tree related diseases, a barrier must be created between diseased and healthy trees, either by cutting the root system with a 54-inch blade or longer by using a vibratory cable plow, or by digging a trench to a minimum depth of 60 inches in the soil surrounding the diseased trees. Such abatement procedures will be carried out in accordance with current technical and expert opinions and plans as designated by the State Commissioner of Agriculture. E. In addition the owner may poison or have poisoned the stumps of trees diseased with oak wilt and shall debark or have debarked to the ground line the stumps of trees diseased with Dutch elm disease or emerald ash borer in such manner as may be approved by the forester. Subd. 11. Abatement by City. In the event the owner fails or refuses to abate the nuisances as so required, then the forester shall upon orders from the Council, abate the nuisance by cutting down diseased shade trees and removing all parts, branches and brush thereof, together with any diseased wood of any diseased shade trees located on the premises, from the premises to an authorized disposal or chipping site. The cost of the City's abating the nuisance shall be billed to the owner or occupant of the premises upon which the nuisances existed. Subd. 12. Assessment for Nuisance Abatement. If the owner or occupant fails to pay the bill, as provided for in Subd. 9, within thirty (30) days of the date thereof, the Council may then assess the amount due, plus interest, against the property as a special assessment under M.S. Ch. 429.101 (amended 11/28/11), as amended from time to time, installments of which assessment shall in no event be payable over a period exceeding five (5) years from the date the same have been levied. On or before October 1 of each year, the city administrator shall list the total unpaid charges for each such abatement against each separate lot or parcel to which the same is attributable. Thereafter, the charges may then be spread by the Council as a special assessment against the property benefited by the abatement, and the assessment certified to the county as provided by law. Subd. 13. Request for Laboratory Testing. Any owner of real estate in the City who receives a notice as provided in Subd. 7 to the effect that shade trees or wood, or both as the case may be, on his or her property harbor shade tree disease and must be removed within the time specified in the notice, may request the forester to obtain a laboratory test of one or more of the trees. The request must be made no later than the date on which the trees or diseased wood are to be removed from the premises, as specified in the written notice from the City to the owner as provided herein, by written notice from the owner to the forester sent by certified mail with return receipt requested. Upon receipt of the request, the forester shall promptly engage the services of the State Department of Agriculture or a qualified laboratory to make analyses of appropriate specimens or samples of the allegedly diseased shade trees. If the analyses confirm the original diagnosis that the shade trees are infected or the wood thereof diseased, or both whichever the case may be, the requesting owner shall pay all expenses and charges incurred for 6 198575v4 the analyses by the City. If the test discloses that the trees or wood are not so diseased, the City shall bear all the costs and the forester shall remove the trees or wood from the list of diseased trees. If the test confirms the original diagnosis that the trees or wood or both as the case may be, are diseased, notice thereof shall be sent the owner by the forester, and the owner shall remove the diseased trees or wood or both as the case may be, within one week after receipt of the notice. Subd. 14. Spraying or Treatment of Shade Trees. A. Whenever the forester determines that any shade tree or shade tree wood within the City is infected with shade tree disease, he or she may spray or treat all nearby high value shade trees by such chemical or mechanical means as will be effective to prevent as fully as possible the spread of shade tree disease thereto. The forester may also cause the diseased shade trees or wood to be sprayed or treated by chemical or mechanical means so as likewise to control the possible spread of shade tree disease to neighboring, high value shade trees. Such procedure shall be carried out in accordance with current technical and expert opinions and plans of the State Department of Agriculture and under the supervision of the Department whenever possible. B. As determined necessary by the City Forester, the City may utilize chemical means of treatment. If chemical treatments are deemed necessary, the cost for this service shall be borne by the City. The costs of the mechanical means of treatment shall be borne by the owner or occupant of the premises, the shade trees upon which have been mechanically treated by the City. The owner or occupant of the premises shall be billed the costs of the mechanical treatment, and in the event of nonpayment of the bill within thirty (30) days of the date thereof, the Council may then assess the amount due, plus interest, in the manner provided in Subd. 10. C. The forester shall notify, in the manner provided in Subd. 9, each owner or occupant of real estate within the City of the date after which shade trees on his or her property shall be mechanically treated, which date shall not be less than five (5) days from the date of mailing the notice. Subd 15. Transportation of Epidemic Diseased Wood. It is unlawful for any person to transport within the City any diseased wood that is determined to be hazardous, as described in Subd. 6. Subd 16. Public Tree Care. The City has the right to plant, prune, maintain, remove or perform any other arboricultural practices as necessary on all public property including the street right-of-way to ensure public safety and to preserve or enhance the symmetry and beauty of such public grounds. Subd 17. Abuse or Mutilation of Public Trees. Unless specifically authorized by the City Forester, no person shall intentionally damage, cut, carve, transplant, remove any tree, attach any rope, wire, nails, advertising poster, or other contrivance to any tree, allow any gaseous liquid or solid substance which is harmful to come in contact with any tree, or set fire or 7 198575v4 permit any fire to burn when the heat could injure any portion of any tree, or top a tree by severely cutting back the tree canopy to a stub. Subd 18. Violation of Penalty. Any person, firm or cooperation who violates any section of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, thereof, shall be subject to a misdemeanor penalty as then by defined by Minnesota law. Additionally, the City may exercise any civil remedy available under Minnesota law for the enforcement of this code including civil action, mandamus, injunctive relief, declaratory action, or the levying of assessments. SECTION 2. Chapter 13 – Zoning Code, Section 1305 – Rules, Scope, Interpretation, & Definitions, Subsection 1305.4 – Definitions, is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: Chapter 13 – Zoning Code Section 1305 – Rules, Scope, Interpretation, & Definitions 1305.04 Definitions. (revised 09/25/17)  Acre. A quantity of land containing forty-three thousand, five hundred and sixty (43,560) square feet or one hundred sixty (160) square rods in whatever shape and pattern (e.g. circular, square, triangular, irregular, broad or narrow).  Acre, net (as applied to PUD density calculations). One (1) acre of land, minus the two- thirds (2/3) of that portion of the acre encompassed by wetlands, one-half (1/2) of that portion of the acre encompassing wholly or partially hills, mounds, or slopes that drop at a rate of twelve percent (12%) or more per every fifteen (15) feet or more of distance; and the entire area of public streets.  Administrative officer. The zoning administrator, building inspector, their deputies or assistants, and any other officials of the city charged with or engaged in the administration of this Code or any portion thereof.  Administrator. The zoning administrator.  Agricultural uses. Uses customarily associated with the growing of farm produce and the raising of farm animals for general use; but not including raising and feeding (feed lots) of livestock, fur farms and kennels.  Alteration. As applied to a building or structure, a change or rearrangement in the structural parts or in the existing facilities, or an enlargement, whether by extending on a side or by increasing in height, or by moving from one location to another. 8 198575v4  Alley. A minor public or private way which is used primarily for vehicular service access to the back or side of a lot abutting on a street.  Animals, domestic. Common household pets, such as dogs and cats, other animals kept for amusement, companionship, decoration, or interest.  Animals, farm. Animals traditionally kept or raised on a farm for the purpose of providing food or products for sale or use, such as cattle, horses, goats, sheep, swine, fowl, bees, and animals raised for fur.  Animals, wild. Animals such as wolves, tigers and poisonous snakes that are not normally a domestic animal or farm animal and would ordinarily be confined in a zoo or found in the wild.  Antenna. Equipment, used for transmitting and/or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior, or outside, of any building or structure.  Antenna, dish. A parabolic-shaped antenna (including all supporting apparatus) which is used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior, or outside, of any building or structure. Class I: Dish Antenna under thirty (30) inches or more in diameter; six (6) feet in surface area; or six (6) feet in height. Class II: Dish Antenna thirty (30) inches or more in diameter; six (6) square feet or more in surface area; or six (6) feet or more in height.  Apartment. A room or suite of rooms located in a one- or two-family building or multiple dwelling, which shall include a bath and kitchen accommodation, intended or designed for use as an independent residence by a single household.  Appeal. An application for the review of an order, requirement, decision, determination or interpretation of this Code made by an administrative officer in the application and/or enforcement of this Code.  Basement. Any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. (revised 05/05/10)  Bluff. A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): (added 02/22/10) 9 198575v4 Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the water body; The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and The slope must drain toward the waterbody.  Bluff impact zone. A bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff. (added 02/22/10)  Board. The board of appeals and adjustment established by this Code.  Boarding house. A structure where sleeping rooms are provided, with a common entrance, internal access to all rooms, one (1) or more bathrooms, and one (1) or more kitchens to provide lodging for at least three (3) but not exceeding five (5) persons. A boarding house is distinguished from a transient accommodation such as a hotel or motel as defined in this chapter. (added 7/14/10)  Boulevard. That portion of a street lying between the lateral line of the roadway portion thereof (i.e., the back of the curb or curb line) and the right-of-way line thereof which may contain within its boundaries a sidewalk or portion of driveway.  Brewpub. A restaurant that also has a facility that manufactures and distributes intoxicating malt liquor or wine in total quantity not to exceed 250,000 barrels a year on the premises. (added 10/29/12)  Building. A structure which is designed and suitable for the habitation or shelter of human beings or animals, or a shelter or storage of property, or is used for trade or manufacturing.  Building line. A line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback beyond which a structure may not extend. (revised 02/22/10)  Building, accessory structure or use. A subordinate building structure or use which is located on the same lot on which the principal building or use is situated and which is reasonable necessary, appropriate and incidental to the conduct of the primary use of such principal building or principal use.  Building envelope. (See Lot, Buildable portion of.)  Building height. The vertical distance from the average elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs. The height of a stepped or terraced building shall be the height of the tallest segment of the building. 10 198575v4  Building inspector. The inspector as provided for in the building code.  Building, principal. A building in which the principal use, of the lot on which it is located, is conducted.  Bulk. The term used to indicate the size and setbacks of buildings or structures and location of same with respect to one another and includes the following items: Size and height of buildings or structures. Location of exterior walls at all levels in relation to lot lines, street or to other buildings or structures. Gross floor area of buildings or structures in relation to lot lines, street or to other buildings or structures. All open spaces allocated to buildings or structures. Amount of lot area per dwelling unit.  Bulk materials. Uncontained solid matter such as powder, grain, stone, sand, sulfur, etc., that has a tendency to become airborne.  Business. Any occupation, employment or enterprise wherein merchandise is exhibited and sold, or which occupies time, attention, labor and materials, or whereby services are offered for compensation.  Business services. Services performed primarily for other businesses, including such services as secretarial, clerical, employment agencies, business machine service, printing, etc.  · Caliper inches. The diameter of a tree measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. (added 4/28/08)  Cemetery/Memorial garden. Land used or dedicated to the burial of the dead, including crematoriums, mausoleums, funeral chapels and necessary sales and maintenance facilities. (added 7/14/10)  Clear vision area. The clear vision area shall be an area within a triangle that is measured along the edge of the driving surface of the road at the intersection of two roads (public or private) and extending thirty (30) feet in each direction from the intersection with a line connecting the two end points. (revised 3/18/09)  Clear-cutting. The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block. (revised 02/22/10)  Clinic. A building for out-patient medical treatment of humans or small animals.  Clubs and lodges. Buildings and facilities owned and operated by a corporation or association of persons for social, recreational, charitable, educational or cultural purposes, but not operated primarily for profit or for purposes which are customarily associated with a business. 11 198575v4  Clubs, sports and fitness. A place of assembly where membership may be required and is directed toward the general public with the commercial promotion of sports and physical fitness.  Commission. The Planning Commission, as established by the Code of Ordinances, City of Arden Hills, Chapter 2.  Commercial recreation, indoor. A commercial recreational use conducted within an enclosed building, including arcade, arena, art gallery, assembly hall, athletic and health clubs, auditorium, bowling alley, club or lounge, community center, pool or billiard hall, or a variety of organized or franchised sports, including but not limited to basketball, ice hockey, wrestling, soccer, tennis and volleyball. This definition does not include public uses on public property. (added 7/14/10)  Comprehensive plan. A compilation of policy statements, goals, standard and maps for guiding the physical, social and economic development, both private and public, of the city and its environs and may include, but is not limited to, the following items: Statements of policies, goals, standards, a land use plan, a community facilities plan, a transportation plan and recommendations for plan execution.  Conditional use. A use which, because of unique characteristics, cannot be classified as a permitted use in a district, and which, after due consideration by the Planning Commission and Council, pursuant to the applicable procedures contained in this Code and the Arden Hills City Code of Ordinances, may nevertheless be permitted with restrictions on a site by conditional use permit granted by the Council.  Conditional use permit (C.U.P.). A permit required for certain land uses classified as Conditional Accessory Uses or Conditional Principal Uses.  Consumer small loan establishment. Any establishment that offers consumer small loans, commonly referred to as "payday loans," as defined in Minnesota State Statute 47.60 as amended from time to time. (added 12/3/08)  Council. The City Council, as established by the Code of Ordinances.  Crematorium. A facility containing properly installed, certified apparatus intended for use in the act of cremation. (added 7/14/10)  Critical root zone. The minimum area around a tree that should remain undisturbed. To calculate the critical root zone, measure the tree's caliper inches. For each caliper inch of tree, 1.5 feet of root radius must be protected. For example, if a tree's is 10 caliper inches, then its critical root radius is 15 feet (10 x 1.5 = 15). The critical root zone is 30 feet. (added 4/28/08)  Day care facility. Any licensed facility, public or private, which for gain or otherwise, regularly provides one or more persons with care, protection, supervision, habilitation, 12 198575v4 rehabilitation or developmental guidance on a regular basis, for periods of less than twenty-four (24) hours per day, in a place other than the person's own home, including but not limited to day care centers, day nurseries, daytime activity centers, day treatment programs, and day services. (revised 7/14/10)  Day care, family. Day care for no more than ten children at one time of which no more than six are under school age. The licensed capacity must include all children of any caregiver when the children are present in the residence. (added 7/14/10)  Day care, group family. Day care for no more than 14 children at any one time. The total number of children includes all children of any caregiver when the children are present in the residence. (added 7/14/10)  Density. The number of dwelling units permitted by this Code on one (1) acre.  Density net. The number of dwelling units permitted by the Code on one (1) net acre of land.  Density transfer. The relocation of housing units or square footage of building area computed on part of a building site to another part of the site resulting in an increase in density to the transfer area for the purpose of preserving open space, forested areas, environmental or terrain features deemed worthy of preservation by the Planning Commission.  Density zoning. Density zoning shall be interpreted as the provision of lot areas smaller than the minimum requirement of this Code under conditions whereby the total number of dwelling units is not greater than the amount permitted under normal conditions.  Dog kennel, Commercial. A structure specifically designed and commercially used for the harboring of three (3) or more dogs that are more than three (3) months old.  Dog kennel, Residential. A structure specifically designed and residentially used for harboring of up to three (3) dogs that are more than three (3) months old.  Dog run. A structure specifically designed for domestic use for the harboring and exercise of not more than two (2) dogs.  Drive-up Window. A window or other opening at a business establishment that allows customers to purchase and/or receive a service or product without having to enter the building. (added 12/03/08)  Dwelling. A building or portion thereof, designed or used exclusively for residential occupancy, including single-family, two-family and multiple family uses, but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, boarding or rooming houses, tents, seasonal cabins, or motor homes or travel trailers. 13 198575v4  Dwelling, live-work unit. A dwelling unit in combination with a shop, office, studio, or other work space within the same unit, where the resident occupant both lives and works. A live-work unit is not synonymous with a home occupation because it is designed as a mixed-use facility, whereas the home occupation is secondary and accessory to the residential use. (added 7/14/10)  Dwelling, multiple family. A dwelling containing three (3) or more attached dwelling units.  Dwelling, single-family. A dwelling that consists of one (1) dwelling unit.  Dwelling, two-family. A dwelling that consists of two (2) dwelling units.  Dwelling unit. A residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one (1) family with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking and eating but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, tents, seasonal cabins, boarding or rooming houses, motor homes or travel trailers.  Dwelling unit, single-family attached. A dwelling unit which is located on its own individual lot but joined along a single lot line to one (1) or more other dwelling units with a party wall and having a separate point of entry.  Dwelling unit, single family detached. A dwelling which is not joined to any other dwelling unit, and is located on a separate lot with the structure surrounded by open space and having a separate point of entry.  Easement. A right or privilege in favor of a person or a government authority to use a parcel of land or portion thereof for specific purpose.  Enclosed Parking. A structure used for the storage of a vehicle which must be covered and completely enclosed by walls or doors on four sides. (added 10/4/12)  Equal Degree of Encroachment. A method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so the flood plain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows.  Exterior storage. The storage of goods, materials, equipment, manufactured products and similar items not fully enclosed by a building.  Family. An individual or two (2) or more persons, each related to the other by blood, marriage, adoption or foster care, or a group of not more than four (4) persons, some or all of whom are not related by blood, marriage or adoption, living together and maintaining a common household. (These regulations shall not be applied so as to prevent the City from making reasonable accommodation as required by the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988). 14 198575v4  Financial institution. An establishment that provides financial and banking services to consumers or clients. Typical uses include banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, investment companies, and automated teller machines (ATMs). Financial institution shall not include a consumer small loan operation. (added 7/14/10)  Flood. A temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas.  Flood frequency. The frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded.  Flood fringe. That portion of the flood plain outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for the City.  Flood plain. The beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or may be covered by the regional flood.  Flood-proofing. A combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages.  Floodway. A wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining flood plain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge.  Floor area. The sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building as measured in square feet from the exterior sides of the exterior walls, or from the centerline of party walls separating attached buildings, but not including covered porches that meet the requirements in Section 1325.03 Subd 2.D; decks; any space where the average floor-to-ceiling height is less than six feet; attached or detached garages; and other detached accessory structures.  Floor area ratio (F.A.R.). The ratio obtained by dividing the sum of a building's floor area by the amount of lot area.  Frontage. The uninterrupted front boundary line of a lot, or the length of such line, which abuts on a street.  Garage, private. An accessory building or portion of the principle building which is intended and used for the storage of the private passenger vehicles of the family or families who reside upon the lot upon which the garage is located.  Garage, repair. A building or space for the repair or maintenance of motor vehicles, including body work, painting and vehicle wash, and incidental display and sales of automotive products but not including factory assembly of such vehicles, auto wrecking, or junkyards. 15 198575v4  Garage, truck. A building that is used or intended to be used for the storage of motor trucks, truck trailers, tractors and commercial vehicles exceeding one-ton rated capacity.  Grading and Excavating. The act of excavation or filling or combination thereof to alter the contour of land for development purposes. (added 7/14/10)  Higher education, campus. The facilities for technical colleges, junior colleges, colleges and universities approved by the Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board for the Minnesota Department of Education. These facilities can include, but are not limited to, classrooms; laboratories; seminaries; dining and residence halls; athletic, wellness, and spiritual facilities; administrative offices; performance art centers; parking and transit structures; and child care facilities. (added 9/25/2017)  Home occupation. The accessory or conditional accessory use of a residential structure for any gainful occupation or profession.  Hospital. An institution licensed by the state department of health, providing primary health services and medical or surgical care, to sick or injured persons, primarily inpatients. May include related facilities such as laboratories, outpatient facilities, or training facilities. (added 7/14/10)  Hotel/motel. Any building, or group of buildings, having five (5) or more guest rooms intended or designed to be rented or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for sleeping purposes by transient guests. (revised 7/14/10)  House of worship. A place of worship or religious assembly and its accessory facilities used by the congregation such as the following: rectory, meeting hall, offices for administration of the institution, licensed child or adult daycare, playground, or cemetery. A house of worship does not include buildings or uses used exclusively for residential, schools, recreational, commercial, or other uses not normally associated with worship. (revised 7/14/10)  Household. The person or persons occupying a single dwelling unit. A household may consist of a single family, one (1) person living alone, two (2) or more families living together or any group of related or un-related persons who share living arrangements.  Industry. Uses such as the manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging, treatment, assembling or warehousing of products and materials.  Junkyard. An open area where waste, used or second-hand materials are bought, sold, exchanged, stored, baled, packed, disassembled or handled, including but not limited to, scrap iron and other metals, paper, rags, rubber, tires and bottles. A junkyard includes a vehicle wrecking yard but does not include uses established entirely within enclosed buildings.  Landscape lot area. That portion of a lot required to remain as open space, free of buildings, parking and drives. Landscape lot areas may consist of: 16 198575v4 Naturally vegetated areas, Wetlands or ponding areas, Planting beds, ground cover and mulch areas (vegetative, rock, bark chip, etc.), Decorative walkways and areas not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the required landscape lot area, and Outdoor recreation areas.  Landscaping. Plantings such as trees, grass, shrubs.  Loading area. Any area where trucks are maneuvered and parked, for the purposes of loading or unloading products, materials or equipment.  Lot. A parcel of land described by metes and bounds measurement, reference to a registered land survey, plat, record of survey map, or other means, and separated from other parcels or portions by said description, and which is occupied by, or is suitable under this Code and other applicable ordinances for occupancy by one (1) principal building, or used together with any accessory buildings or uses and such open spaces as are required by this Code.  Lot area. The total site area within the lot lines.  Lot area, net buildable. The space remaining on a lot after the minimum landscape area, open space and setback requirements of this Code have been met.  Lot area per family. The lot area per family is the lot area required by this Code to be provided for each family in a dwelling.  Lot, buildable portion of. (Building Envelope) The area of a lot on which a principal structure may be placed. The portion of a lot remaining after the minimum building setbacks have been met. (Lot area, net buildable, is more limiting as other deductions are included).  Lot, corner. A lot situated at and abutting on the intersection of two (2) or more streets having an angle of intersection of not more than one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees. A lot abutting upon a curve street shall be deemed a corner lot if the tangents to the curve at its point of beginning within the lot or at the points of intersection of the side lot lines with the street line intersect at the interior angle of less than one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees. A corner lot shall maintain front yard requirements for each street frontage.  Lot coverage. The total allowable amount of lot area, expressed as a percentage, which may be covered by a principal use and its accessory structures.  Lot depth. The mean horizontal distance between the mean front road and the mean rear lot line. The greater frontage of a corner lot is its depth, and its lesser frontage is its width. 17 198575v4  Lot line. A property boundary line of any lot held in single or separate ownership or separately described; except that where any portion of the lot extends into the abutting street or alley, the lot line shall be deemed to be the street or alley line.  Lot line, front. The boundary of a lot abutting a street. On a corner lot, the shortest street lot line shall be the front lot line.  Lot line, rear. The lot line most nearly parallel to and most remote from the front lot line.  Lot line, side. Lot lines other than front or rear lot lines. On a corner lot, the longest street lot line shall be a side lot line.  Lot, interior. A lot other than a corner or reversed corner lot.  Lot, reversed corner. A corner lot, the rear of which abuts upon the side of another lot whether across an alley or not.  Lot of record. A lot existing as of April 10th, 1993, date of this Code or approved by the city as a lot subsequent to such date, and includes non-conforming lots.  Lot, shoreline. A lot having one (1) or more lot lines fronting on public waters.  Lot, through. A lot that has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two (2) substantially parallel streets, and which is not a corner lot. On a through lot, the determination of whether the street frontage is to be considered a front yard or rear yard shall be as subject to the provisions of this Code.  Lot width. The mean horizontal distance between the side lot lines at the minimum front setback line.  Lowest floor. The lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building's lowest floor. (added 05/05/10)  Manufactured home. A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein; except that the term includes any structure which meets all the requirements and with respect to which the manufacturer voluntarily files a certification and complies with the standards established under this Code and Minnesota State Statutes as amended from time to time. The term "manufactured home" does not include the term "recreational vehicle." (revised 05/05/10) 18 198575v4  Manufacturing and processing. All uses which include the compounding, processing, packaging, treatment, or assembly of products and materials. Generally, these are industries dependent upon raw materials refined elsewhere. These uses include, but are not limited to: fabrication of wood, metal, and plastic products; assembly of electronic components, equipment, and appliances; processing of chemicals, plastics, food products, and nonalcoholic beverages; manufacturing of clothing and textile products; distribution centers, lumber yards, printing and binding shops, machine shops, sheet metal shops, sign shops, contractor's shops and storage yards. o Class I: Above uses without exterior storage. o Class II: Above uses with permitted exterior storage.  Metes and bounds. A method of property description utilizing directions and distances commencing from and terminating at an easily identifiable point.  Microbrewery. A facility that manufactures and distributes intoxicating malt liquor or wine in total quantity not to exceed 250,000 barrels a year. A microbrewery may have space dedicated as a taproom to distribute on-sale and off-sale alcohol in compliance with MN state statute 340A.301, subd. 6b. (added 10/29/12)  Microdistillery. A facility that manufactures and distributes premium, distilled spirits in total quantity not to exceed 40,000 proof gallons in a calendar year. (added 10/29/12)  Mineral extraction. The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, and other nonmetallic minerals not regulated under Minn. Stat. Chapts. 93.44 - 93.51; or Successor Statutes. Mineral extraction does not include grading and excavating as defined in this Chapter. (added 7/14/10)  Mobile home. A manufactured home designed, constructed, and equipped for use as a single-family dwelling, which has a width of less than twenty (20) feet over more than twenty- five (25) percent of its length; or which is not placed on a permanent foundation complying with the requirements of the state building code or which is not continuous and solid for the entire perimeter of the structure.  Mobile home park. Any premises on which are parked two (2) or more occupied mobile homes, excluding premises on which mobile homes are sold for removal to another site.  Mortuary, funeral home. An establishment engaged in undertaking services such as preparing the dead for burial and arranging and managing funerals, but not including a crematorium. (added 7/14/10)  Motorized vehicle leasing and rentals. A business that leases or rents motorized vehicles to the general public. Includes minor services and washing as an accessory use. Not more than eight (8) rental or lease vehicles on site at one time. 19 198575v4  Motorized vehicle service. A business that provides repair or maintenance services for motorized vehicles including engine repair, replacement or parts and engine service, but does not include body work, painting, factory assembly of vehicles or vehicle wrecking yards.  Multiple occupancy building. A building containing two or more independent businesses with or without separate exterior entrances and for which signage, parking and site requirements are unified in a consistent visual and functional manner.  Native vegetation. "Native Vegetation" - Plant species indigenous to Minnesota, or that expand their range into Minnesota without being intentionally or unintentionally introduced by human activity, and are classified as native in the Minnesota Plant Database (Minnesota DNR, 2002 or as amended). Native Vegetation does not include Weeds. (revised 02/22/10)  Nonconforming building. A building lawfully existing as of the effective date of the adoption of this Code, or amendment hereto, which under the provisions of this Code could not be built because of restrictions on height, setbacks, yards, lot coverage, floor area ratio, or other characteristics of the building or its location on the lot where it exists.  Nonconforming use. A building, structure or use of a building, structure or parcel of land, or a portion thereof, lawfully existing as of the effective date of the adoption of this Code or amendment hereto, as a matter of right or by permit, which is not permitted in the zoning district in which it is located.  Nursery. Any land used to raise trees, shrubs, flowers, and other live plants for sale and commerce.  Nursing Home and Assisted Living Facility. A facility that provides daily assistance and long-term residence for disabled or elderly individuals. This includes a combination of housing, supportive services, personalized assistance and health care designed to respond to the individual needs of those who need help with activities of daily living, such as dressing, grooming, bathing, etc. (added 7/14/10)  Obstruction. Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel, modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water.  Office(s). A room, suite of rooms, or a building containing rooms or suites of rooms in which persons conduct commercial activities, provide professional services, or carry on occupations and where goods are not stored, produced, sold at retail or repaired, including but not limited to the following: executive and administrative offices, business offices such as insurance, real estate, sales and similar offices, professional offices such as offices of engineers, 20 198575v4 surveyors, architects, accountants, attorneys and bookkeepers and similar offices, but excluding medical clinics. (revised 7/14/10)  Office showroom/warehouse. An office facility in which more than 50 percent of the total floor area is utilized for the display and sale of goods or merchandise on the premises, and/or for the storage and distribution of goods or merchandise from the premises. (added 7/14/10)  Off-street parking areas. Structures or areas of ground used for the storage or parking of motor vehicles.  Open sales lot. Any land used or occupied for the purpose of buying and selling any goods, materials, or merchandise, and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale.  Open space. (See landscape lot area.)  Ordinary high water level. The boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall be an elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape and as determined by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. (revised 02/22/10)  Outdoor display and sales. The display of goods for sale or rent outside an enclosed building. (added 3/28/16)  Park facilities. The use of any lots or parcel of land and any structure or building thereon for public active and passive recreation purposes by the Arden Hills Parks and Recreation Department or the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department. (added 11/25/13)  Parking space. A land area of such shape and dimensions and so prepared as to be usable for the parking of a motor vehicle, and so located as to be readily accessible to a public street or alley. Truck loading and unloading space shall not be included in such area.  Pathway, pedestrian way. A public or private way, running across or located within a platted lot or block or an unplatted parcel of land, used primarily for pedestrian traffic.  Pawn shop. The location at which or premises in which a pawnbroker regularly conducts business. (added 7/14/10) o Pawnbroker. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), "pawnbroker" means a person engaged in whole or in part in the business of lending money on the security of pledged goods left in pawn, or in the business of purchasing tangible personal property to be left in pawn on the condition that it may be redeemed or repurchased by the seller for a fixed price within a fixed period of time. 21 198575v4 (b) The following are exempt from the definition of "pawnbroker": any bank regulated by the state of Minnesota, the comptroller of the currency of the United States, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the board of governors of the Federal Reserve System, or any other federal or state authority and their affiliates; any bank or savings association whose deposits or accounts are eligible for insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any successor to it and all affiliates of those banks and savings associations; any state or federally chartered credit union; and any industrial loan and thrift company or regulated lender subject to licensing and regulation by the Department of Commerce. (revised 7/14/10)  Person. Any individuals, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint stock association or body politic; includes any trustee, receiver, assignee or other similar representative thereof.  Personal services. Services customarily rendered for compensation. Such services shall only involve minor storage and related sales of products and supplies related to the service offered and for customers ordinarily utilizing the service offered. Typical personal services include but are not limited to: apparel tailoring and cleaning; hair styling, trimming and cutting; beauty services; photographic services; and other services of a similar nature.  Planned unit development (P.U.D.). The development of a tract of land in a unified manner, pursuant to a development plan specifically approved by the city.  Planning commission. The planning agency of Arden Hills as prescribed in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462.354. It is advisory to the City Council on all matters related to the Comprehensive Plan and all official controls that implement the Comprehensive Plan, and all other matters referred to it by the City Council.  Protected waters. Any waters of the State as defined by State law. However, no lake, pond or flowage of less than ten (10) acres in size and no river or stream having a total drainage area less than two (2) square miles shall be regulated for the purposes of these regulations.  Public use. The use of any lot, parcel of land and any structure or building thereon exclusively for public purposes by any department or branch of government, federal, state, county or city, excluding independent school districts, without reference to the ownership of said lot, parcel of land, building or structure.  Public waters. Means a body of water capable of substantial beneficial public use. This shall be construed to mean, for the purposes of these regulations, any body of water, which has the potential to support any type of recreational pursuit or water supply purpose. A body of water created by a private user where there was no previous shoreland, as defined herein, for a designated private use authorized by the commissioner of natural resources, shall be exempt. 22 198575v4  Railroad right-of-way. A strip of land with tracks and auxiliary facilities for track operation, but not including depots, loading platforms, station, train sheds, warehouses, car shops, car yards, locomotive shops or water towers.  Reach. A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach.  Recreation, commercial. Recreational facilities which are operated for profit or render a service which is customarily considered as a business.  Recreation, residential. Play apparatus such as swing sets and slides, sandboxes, poles for nets, picnic tables, lawn chairs, barbecue stands, and similar equipment or structures, when used on residential property, but not including electronic towers, tree houses, swimming pools, playhouses exceeding twenty-five (25) square feet of floor area, or sheds utilized for storage of equipment.  Recreational vehicles (RVs). Vehicles for recreational or utilitarian uses that can be driven, towed, or hauled. Including, but not limited to, motor homes and travel trailers, snowmobiles, pull campers, all terrain vehicles (ATVs), tent trailers, or other similar vehicles. (revised 02/07/08)  Recreational vehicles (for the purposes of Section 1335 only). A vehicle that is built on a single chassis, is 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection, is designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck, and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. For the purposes of Section 1335, the term recreational vehicle shall be synonymous with the term travel trailer/travel vehicle. (added 05/05/10)  Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, Riding Lawn Mowers, and Watercraft Height. The distance as measured from the ground to the highest point of the recreational vehicle, utility trailer, or watercraft, including any covering, as stored. This does not including antennas and utility/mechanical systems provided they are accessory and take up no more than ten (10) percent of the roof surface area. RVs and watercraft on a trailer shall be measured as one. (revised 02/07/08)  Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, Riding Lawn Mowers, and Watercraft Length. The distance as measured from end to end of the recreational vehicle, utility trailer, or watercraft, including any hitch, motor, and covering, as stored. RVs and watercraft on a trailer shall be measured as one. (revised 02/07/08)  Regional flood. A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood", 1 percent annual chance flood, or 100-year elevation. 23 198575v4  Regulatory flood protection elevation. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. (added 05/05/10)  Research animals. Animals kept in a laboratory setting for the purpose of testing and research related health care products.  Research and development facility. Establishments which conduct research, development, or controlled production of high technology electronic, industrial, or scientific products or commodities for sale; or establishments conducting educational or medical research or testing. May include limited accommodations for researchers or research subjects. Research with animals is considered a separate category. (added 7/14/10)  Residence hall, dormitory. A building designed for or used as group living quarters for students of a high school, college, university or seminary, organized and owned, or leased in its entirety, by a high school, college, university or seminary. (added 7/14/10)  Residential facility. Any licensed facility, public or private, which for gain or otherwise, regularly provides one or more persons with a twenty-four (24) hours per day substitute for care, food, lodging, training, education, supervision, habilitation, rehabilitation and treatment they need, but which for any reason cannot be furnished in the person's own home, including but not limited to, state institutions under the control of the commissioner of public welfare, foster homes, residential treatment centers, maternity shelters, group homes, residential programs, or schools for handicapped children.  Restaurant. A business establishment whose principal business is the preparation, service and sale of food and beverages to be consumed by customers while seated at tables or counters located within the building on the premises.  Restaurant, fast food. Any restaurant which meets a number of the following requirements: o Customarily provides quick service to its customers; o Offers to its customers a limited, standardized menu of inexpensive food and/or beverages; o Serves its customers from a counter located within the building on the premises and does not customarily offer service at the table by waiter or waitress; o Allows customers to consume their orders of food and/or beverages at tables or counters within the building, in their automobiles parked on the premises, or away from the premises as the customers choose; 24 198575v4 o Packages and services a substantial proportion of its food and/or beverages in disposable wrappers, containers, cartons, boxes and bags; o Provides a number of trash, litter, or garbage cans in the parking areas and within the building on the premises for the deposit of the disposable packaging in which the food and/or beverages are provided; o Prepares and cooks a substantial proportion of its food in volume, in advance of orders by customers, and usually in anticipation of predicted volumes of customers at certain times of the day; o Specifies the items of food and/or beverage offered to customers on signs, placards, posters, valances, or boards posted in conspicuous places throughout the building rather than on printed menus given to the customers; o Generates a high volume and rapid flow of in-and-out traffic because of its quick service mode of operation.  Retail sales and service. An establishment engaged principally in the sale or rental of primarily new goods and the provision of services directly to the consumer, excluding those uses defined more specifically in this Code. Motor vehicle sales, motor vehicle leasing and rentals, exterior equipment rental and sales lots, repair garages, pawn shops, thrift stores, and open sales lots are not included in this definition of retail sales and service. (revised 2/29/16)  Roadway. The entirety of a private street and that portion of a public street extending from the back of the curb (i.e., the curbline) on one side to the back of the curb (i.e., the curbline) on the other side, used primarily for vehicular traffic.  Schools, bus terminal. School bus terminal shall be a building or space engaged primarily in the transportation and activities associated with the transportation of students.  Schools, general education. Nursery, primary, elementary and secondary schools.  Schools, specialized education. Trade, vocational, business, barber, beauty, art, music, dancing, driving and other professional schools, with or without on-site housing. (revised 01/20/11)  Service station. A place where gasoline, kerosene, diesel or other motor fuel or lubricating oil or grease for operating motor vehicles are offered for sale to the public and deliveries are made directly into motor vehicles. Includes greasing and oiling, one-bay motor vehicle wash and the sale of automobile accessories on the premises. Also includes minor repairs, incidental body and fender work, minor painting and upholstering, replacement of parts and motor services to passenger automobiles and trucks not exceeding one and one-half (1.5) tons capacity. It shall not include major general repair, rebuilding or reconditioning of engines, 25 198575v4 motor vehicles or trailers; collision service, including body, frame or fender straightening or repair; overall painting or paint job.  Setback. The minimum horizontal distance between a structure and the ordinary high water level or between a structure and a road, well, highway, or property lines.  Setback, minimum building. The minimum horizontal distance allowed by this Code, between a structure and a lot line.  Shore impact zone. The land located between the ordinary high water level and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. (revised 02/22/10)  Shoreland. The land located within the following distances from protected waters: o One thousand (1,000) feet from the ordinary high water mark of a lake, pond, or flowage; and o Three hundred (300) feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a flood plain on such rivers or streams, whichever is greater.  The practical limits of shorelands may be less than the statutory limits where the limits are designated by natural drainage divides at lesser distances, as shown on the official zoning map of the City.  Sidewalk. A hard surfaced public or private way, used primarily for pedestrian traffic.  Sign. A name, identification, description, display, logo, illustration or device which is affixed to, painted or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other surface or piece of land, and which directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or business.  Significant tree. A tree that is important to the site and the neighborhood character, that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets at least one of the following standards: (revised 04/28/08) o A deciduous hardwood tree that is at least ten (10) caliper inches, including but not limited to, ironwood, catalpa, oak, hard maple, walnut, hickory, birch, black cherry, hackberry, locust and basswood. o A deciduous softwood tree that is at least twelve (12) caliper inches, including but not limited to, cottonwood, poplars/aspen, box elder, willow, silver maple and elm. o A coniferous evergreen tree having foliage on the outermost portion of the branches year-round and which is at least fifteen (15) feet or more in height. 26 198575v4 o A group of deciduous trees that are at least eight (8) caliper inches or coniferous trees that are at least fifteen (15) feet in height, that provide a buffer or screening along an adjacent public street or between differing land uses.  Soil processing. The processing of sand, gravel or other materials mined from the land.  Staging Area. Any exterior area that is used to load, unload, stack, pile, store or assemble materials, equipment or vehicles to be used either on site or off site.  Story. That portion of a building included between the surface of any floor and the surface of the floor next above it, or, if no such floor above, the space between such floor and the ceiling next above it.  Story, half. A space under a sloping roof which has the line of intersection of roof decking and wall face not more than three (3) feet above the top floor level, and in which space not more than two-thirds (2/3) of the floor area is finished for use. A half-story containing independent apartment or living quarters shall be counted as a full story.  Streets. A public or private way, consisting in the case of a private way of a roadway and in the case of a public way of a roadway and a boulevard (the latter of which may contain a sidewalk), used primarily for vehicular traffic, whether designated as a street, avenue, parkway, road, lane, throughway, expressway, highway, place or however otherwise designated. The term "streets" includes the following classifications: o Collector street. A street which carries traffic from local streets to streets and highways of higher classifications. It provides for both land access service and local traffic movements within residential neighborhoods, commercial areas and industrial areas. o Cul-de-sac. A street with a circular turn-a-round and only one outlet. o Local street. A street of limited continuity used primarily for access to the abutting properties and the local needs of a neighborhood. o Minor arterial. A street system that interconnects with and augment the urban major arterial system and provide service to trips of moderate length at somewhat lower level of travel mobility than major arterials. This system distributes travel to geographical areas smaller than those identified with the higher system. o Major arterial. Usually a divided highway with four (4) or more lanes and serves the major centers of activity of a metropolitan area, the highest traffic volume corridors, and the longest trip desire. The major arterial carries a high proportion of the total urban area travel on a minimum mileage. Almost all fully and partially controlled access facilities are a part of this class. 27 198575v4 o Expressway. A type of major arterial with a controlled access roadway and expressway ramps to provide ingress or egress to other levels of streets. The use of expressway ramps allows the uniform flow of traffic on a major arterial highway without undue delays.  Structural alterations. Any change in the supporting members of a building such as bearing walls, columns, beams or girders, or any substantial changes in the roof and exterior walls.  Structure. Anything constructed, the use of which requires a permanent location on the ground or attachment to something having a permanent location on the ground, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, manufactured homes, signs, recreational vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria otherwise specified in the zoning code, and other similar items.  Structure, accessory. A detached, subordinate structure, the use of which is incidental and related to that of the principal use of or principal structure on the lot on which it is located.  Structure, multiple-occupancy. (See Multiple occupancy building).  Structure, principal. The predominant structure upon a lot in which the principal use of the lot is conducted.  Structure, temporary or portable. A structure which is not intended for permanent occupancy but which may be suitable in certain situations for specific periods of occupancy pending either construction of permanent facilities or a change in conditions that will eliminate the need for the temporary structure. Portable classrooms, portable offices, and air-supported structures are examples of temporary or portable structures.  Studios. A building or space within a building where professional artists, musicians, photographers, dancers, designers, etc. practice their profession or teach; display and sales of products used or produced in the profession is considered an accessory use.  Substantial damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. (added 05/05/10)  Substantial improvement. (added 05/05/10) Within any consecutive 365-day period, any reconstruction, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred "substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: 28 198575v4 o Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. o Any alteration of an "historic structure," provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as an "historic structure." For the purpose of this Ordinance, "historic structure" shall be as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 59.1.  Thrift Store. A business for which the stock of goods is primarily used and may include the following operational characteristics: o Receipt of used items directly from the public at the business location. o Processing, conditioning, cleaning, or repair of used or returned items for resale. o Storage of used items on site for processing, resale, or disposal. o Receipt of goods through purchase, consignment, or donation. (added 2/29/16)  Tower. Any pole, spire or structure, or any combination thereof, to which an antenna is attached, or which is designed for an antenna to be attached, and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces; including but not limited to a free-standing radio (including ham radio and private radio transmitting) or television receiving antenna, a windmill, and a wind-power generator.  Townhouse. A single-family dwelling, which maintains private ingress and egress, contains no independent dwellings above or below it, and is attached to other similar dwellings by a common wall.  Use. The purpose for which land or premises or a building thereon is designated, arranged or intended, or for which it is or may be occupied or maintained.  Use, accessory. A use which is incidental to the principal use of the lot on which it is maintained or conducted.  Use, principal. The primary or predominant use for which the lot and structure, if any located thereon, is conducted or maintained.  Use, principal multiple-operation. A business or industrial operation which consists of two or more distinguishable uses, all of which are dependent upon each other, but none of which is predominately or clearly the principal use and all of which are generally compatible with the permitted allowable uses in the district.  Use, conditional accessory. A use which is both an accessory use and a conditional use and which, after due consideration by the Commission and Council, pursuant to the applicable 29 198575v4 procedures contained herein, may be allowed as an accessory use by Conditional Use Permit granted by the Council.  Use, conditional principal. A principle use which, because of unique characteristics, cannot be classified as a permitted principle use in any particular district, and which, after due consideration by the commission and council, pursuant to the applicable procedures contained herein, may nevertheless be allowed on a site in a particular zoning district by Conditional Use Permit be granted by the council. Includes temporary uses which require conditional approval before being allowed.  Utility distribution lines. The distribution facilities of electric power, gas, water and communication companies which directly serve abutting properties.  Utility substation. A structure used for the relay or distribution of electric, water, sewer, telephone, etc., services.  Utility transmission lines. The transmission facilities of electric power and communication companies which do not directly serve abutting properties.  Utility trailer. Equipment used for recreational or utilitarian purposes that can be towed; such as special purpose trailers (i.e. boat trailers, ATV trailers) or other hauling trailers. (revised 02/07/08)  Utility vehicle. A vehicle, with or without a motor, and/or adapted for temporary living, sleeping, business or storage purposes; having a frame, but no foundation other than wheels, blocks, studs, jacks, horses or skirting, which does not reach or meet building code requirements and has been or may be equipped with wheels or other devices for transporting purposes. This term shall include travel trailers, camping trailers, tent trailers, recreation vehicles, farm tractors, riding yard and garden tractors and trailers. A permanent foundation shall not change the character of the vehicle.  Variance. A modification or variation of a specific permitted development standard required as a provision of this Code, to allow an alternative development standard not stated as acceptable in the official control, but only as applied to a particular property for the purpose of alleviating a hardship, practical difficulty or unique circumstance, except that modification in the allowable uses within a district shall not be allowed as a variance. (revised 05/05/10)  Vehicle wash. A building, or portion thereof, which principal use is the washing of vehicles.  Vehicle wrecking yard. Any open space where three (3) or more used motorized vehicles are stored which do not possess current state auto licenses.  Warehousing. The storage and distribution of materials or equipment within an enclosed building, but not including personal storage facility. (revised 7/14/10) 30 198575v4  Watercraft. Motorized water-oriented vehicles including, but not limited to, power boats, cruisers, jet skies, fishing/hunting boats, pontoon boats, and any non-motorized craft with greater than a two person capacity. This definition excludes non-motorized one and two person crafts such as canoes, kayaks, and paddle boats. (revised 02/07/08)  Waterfront uses. Boat docks and storage, water recreation equipment and other uses normally associated with to lakeshore property.  Wetlands. Transitional low-lying areas between terrestrial and aquatic systems, either created or natural, covered with shallow and sometimes temporary or intermittent waters as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Circulator No. 39. This includes, but is not limited to swamps, marshes, bogs, sloughs, wet meadows, and shallow lakes and ponds with emergent vegetation. (revised 02/22/10)  Wetland alteration. Alteration of a wetland includes changes to the wetland and/or wetland buffer strip in regards to size, depth or contour; dredging; tilling; damming; alteration of the watercourse; ditching; tiling; grading; draining; discharge of water; appropriation of water; changes in vegetation; or otherwise altering or destroying a wetland or wetland buffer or their functions. Alterations would not include Native Vegetation plantings or selective clearing or pruning of prohibited or restricted noxious weeds, unless within a Drainage and Utility Easement in which case submission of and written approval by the City is required. (added 02/22/10)  Wetland buffer strip. An area of vegetated ground cover around the perimeter of a wetland that, either in its natural condition or through intervention, has the characteristics of buffering the wetland from surrounding landscaping. (added 02/22/10)  Wetland delineation. An assessment tool utilized to determine the boundary of a wetland using the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (January 1987) as well as any additional boundary determination requirements established in Minnesota Rules Chapter 8420. A "Wetland Delineation Report" is a document that summarizes the observations, results and conclusions performed during the assessment when wetlands are present. (added 02/22/10)  Yard, front. A yard extending along the full length of the front lot line between the side lot lines.  Yard, minimum required. The minimum open space extending between a minimum building setback line and the adjoining lot line in which a principle building may not be placed and in which accessory buildings may only be placed as regulated in this Code.  Yard, rear. A yard extending across the full width of the lot and measured between the rear line of the lot and the rear line of the main building.  Yard, side. A yard between the building and the adjacent sideline of the lot and extending from the front yard to the rear yard. 31 198575v4  Yard area, required rear. The minimum required rear yard depth multiplied by the average width of the total rear yard.  Zoning map. The map or maps incorporated into this Code as a part hereof, delineating the zoning districts. SECTION 3. Chapter 13 – Zoning Code, Section 1325 – General Regulations, Subsection 1325.08 – Filling and Excavation, is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: Chapter 13 – Zoning Code Section 1325 – General Regulations 1325.08 Filling and Excavation. Subd. 1 Permit Required. An administrative permit shall be required for any filling or excavation of up to four hundred (400) cubic yards per parcel, or four hundred (400) cubic yards per acre, whichever is greater. Operations of over the above-described amounts shall be considered land reclamation or mining, and shall require a conditional use permit in accordance with Chapter 8 of the Arden Hills Code of Ordinances. Subd. 2 Exceptions. The following operations are excepted from the preceding permit requirements: A. Excavation related to the construction of a building with a duly issued building permit; B. Filling, excavation, and grading associated with site improvements and site preparation for a duly approved subdivision or site plan; C. Excavation for construction of public streets and utilities; D. Filling, excavation, or movement of less than fifty (50) one hundred (100) cubic yards of earth for landscaping purposes on a lot already occupied by a residential structure; E. Minor agricultural or conversation conservation operations. Subd. 3 Type of Fill. Fill to be placed on sites must be gravel, sand, dirt, clay or other non-decomposable material similar to natural soils found in the upland area of Arden Hills. Building construction materials, concrete, bituminous, and soils containing hazardous or toxic waste, predominately organic materials, household wastes, mechanical debris, etc., shall not be permitted. 32 198575v4 Subd. 4 Performance Time. Filling and excavation operations for which a permit has been issued shall be completed within a period as specified in the permit, but in no event beyondof one hundred and twenty (120) days from the commencement of the operation, and within one year of the issuance of the permit, unless an extension is requested of and granted by the City Council. Subd. 5 Periodic Operations. Periodic filling or excavation of amounts less than four hundred (400) cubic yards per parcel or per acre shall be allowed under separate administrative permits until the composite total of such periodic operations exceeds four hundred (400) cubic yards. Further operations will then be subject to the requirements of Chapter 8 of the Arden Hills Code of Ordinances. Subd. 6 Submissions. The applicant for permit shall submit the following information: A. A legal description, plat, or survey of property to be altered. B. A statement of purpose for the filling or excavation. C. A plan identifying the areas of the site to be altered, the estimated quantity of material to be moved, the degree of grade adjustment, the proposed finished grade, the existing and proposed drainage pattern, and proposed erosion control measures. A complete grading plan may be required if considered necessary to the evaluation of the request. Subd. 7 Review Procedure. The permit application shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and other members of the administrative staff to determine the impact of the proposed operations upon drainage patterns, adjacent properties, wetlands, and bodies of water. The permit may be approved as submitted, approved with modifications, or rejected because of specifically stated adverse impacts. If denied, the applicant may appeal the administrative decision to the City Council within ten (10) days. SECTION 4. Chapter 15 – Erosion and Sediment Control is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: Chapter 15 - Erosion and Sediment Control 1500.00 Purpose and Scope 1500.04 Purpose. The purpose of this regulation is to control or eliminate soil erosion and sedimentation within the City of Arden Hills. The regulation establishes standards and specifications for conservation practices and planning activities which minimize soil erosion and sedimentation and work to protect the City's natural resources for the health, safety, and welfare of the public. 33 198575v4 1500.02 Scope. Except as exempted by the definition of the term "land disturbance activity" in Section 1510.01, any person, firm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, state agency, or political subdivision thereof proposing land disturbance activity within the City shall apply to the Public Works Director or appointed designee (herein called "PWD") for the approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. No land shall be disturbed until the Plan is approved by the PWD and conforms to the standards set forth in this article. Section 1510 – Definitions 1510.01 Definitions For the purposes of this ordinance, the following terms have the meanings given them in this section:  Best Management Practices (BMP). Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, general good housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to stormwater, receiving waters, or stormwater conveyance systems. BMPs also include treatment practices, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or water disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage.  Non-structural BMP: Practices that focus on preserving open space, protecting natural systems, and incorporating existing landscape features such as wetlands and stream corridors to manage storm water at its source. Other practices include clustering and concentrating development, minimizing disturbed areas, and reducing the size of impervious areas.  Structural BMP: a physical device that is typically designed and constructed to trap or filter pollutants from runoff, or reduce runoff velocities.  Bluff. A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): o Part or all of the topographic feature is located in a shoreland area; o The slope rises at least twenty five (25) feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; o The grade of the slope from the toe, or bottom, of the bluff to a point twenty five (25) feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages thirty percent (30%) or greater; and 34 198575v4 o The slope must drain toward the waterbody.  Certificate of Completion. The certificate issued after the final inspection of the site has been completed, temporary erosion control has been removed and the site has been fully restored.  Clear-cutting. The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block.  Clearing and grubbing. The trimming, pruning, cutting and or removal of trees, shrubs, bushes, windfalls and other vegetation including removal of stumps, roots, and other remains in the designated areas.  Erosion. Any process that wears away the surface of the land by the action of water, wind, ice, gravity and/or land disturbance activities. Erosion can be accelerated by the activities of man and nature.  Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Plan) is a plan which includes a set of best management practices or equivalent measures designed to control surface runoff and erosion and to retain sediment on a particular site during the period in which pre-construction and construction related land disturbances, fills, and soil storage occur, and before final improvements are completed, all in accordance with the specific requirements set forth in Section 1520. This Plan shall also include permanent measures and Best Management Practices to control post- construction surface runoff and sediment.  Erosion and sediment control practice specifications and erosion and sediment control practices. The management procedures, techniques, and methods to control soil erosion and sedimentation as officially adopted by the City.  Excavation. The mechanical removal of earth material.  Fill. The deposit of soil or other earth materials placed by artificial means.  General Storm Water Permit. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction storm water permit covering anyone conducting a land disturbing activity which disturbs one (1) or more acres of total land area.  Grading. Excavation or fill of material, including the resulting conditions thereof.  Land Disturbance Activity. Any land change greater than 2,5005,000 square feet or 50 cubic yards, or land change on a parcel of land located within a shoreland area or adjacent to a surface water that may result in soil erosion from wind, water and/or ice and the movement of sediments into or upon waters or lands of the city, including but not limited to construction, clear- 35 198575v4 cutting, clearing and grubbing, grading, excavating, transporting and filling of land. Land Disturbance Activity does not mean the following: o Minor land disturbance activities such as home gardens and an individual's home landscaping, repairs and maintenance work affecting less than 2,500 square feet; o Additions or modifications to existing single-family dwellings or accessory structures that will result in creating under 2,500 square feet of exposed soil and/or impervious surface and less than 50 cubic yards in a shoreland area; o Construction, installation and maintenance of electric, telephone, and cable television utility lines or individual service connection to these utilities, except where a minimum of 5,000 square feet of land disturbance can be anticipated; o Tilling, planting or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural, or silvicultural crops; o Installation of fence, sign, telephone, and electric poles and other kinds of posts, bollards or poles; and o Emergency work to protect life, limb, or property and emergency repairs. However, if the land disturbing activity would have required an approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan except for the emergency, then the land area disturbed shall be shaped and stabilized in accordance with the requirement of the PWD when applicable.  Outfall. The point source where a storm sewer system discharges from a pipe, ditch, or other discrete conveyance to receiving waters, or to a storm sewer system owned and operated by another party.  Permittee. A person, firm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, state agency or political subdivision thereof engaged in a land disturbance activity who submits an application to the PWD for a permit pursuant to this ordinance.  Phasing. Clearing a parcel of land in distinct phases, with the stabilization of each phase before the clearing of the next.  Ramsey Conservation District. The Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District.  Rice Creek Watershed District. An organization which oversees the activities in the Rice Creek watershed as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 103B,and 103D.  Runoff. Rainfall, snowmelt, or irrigation water flowing over the ground surface.  Sediment. Solid mineral or organic material that, in suspension, is being transported, or has been moved from its original site by air, water, gravity, or ice, and has been deposited at another location. 36 198575v4  Sedimentation. The process or action of depositing sediment, caused by erosion.  · Site. The entire area of land on which the land disturbance activity is proposed in the permit application.  Site Plan. A plan or set of plans showing the details of any land disturbance activity of a site including but not limited to the construction of: structures, open and enclosed drainage facilities, stormwater management facilities, parking lots, driveways, curbs, pavements, sidewalks, bike paths, recreational facilities, ground covers, plantings, and landscaping.  Shoreland. The land located within the following distances from protected waters: o One thousand (1,000) feet from the ordinary high water mark of a lake, pond, or flowage; o Three hundred (300) feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a flood plain on such rivers or streams, whichever is greater; and, o The practical limits of shorelands may be less than the statutory limits where the limits are designated by natural drainage divides at lesser distances, as shown on the official map of the City.  Stabilization. The use of measures which protect soil from the erosion forces of wind, rain and flowing water.  Steep Slope. Land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Where specific information is not available, steep slopes are lands having average slopes over twelve percent (12%), as measured over horizontal distances of fifty (50) feet or more, that are not bluffs.  Surface Water or Waters. All streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs, rivers, drainage systems, waterways, watercourses, and irrigation systems whether natural or artificial, public or private.  Utility. The owner/operator of any underground facility including an underground line, facility, system, and its appurtenances used to produce, store, convey, transmit, or distribute communications, data, electricity, power, heat, gas, oil, petroleum products, water (including stormwater), steam, sewage and other similar substances.  Watercourse. Any natural or improved stream, river, creek, ditch, channel, canal, conduit, gutter, culvert, drain, gully, swale, or wash in which waters flow either continuously or intermittently. 37 198575v4  Watershed. A region draining to a specific river, river system, or body of water.  Wetlands. A lowland area such as a marsh, that is saturated with moisture, as defined in Sec. 404, Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1987, or the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Section 1520 – Erosion and Sediment Control Plans and Review 1520.01 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Subd. 1 Required. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted to the PWD for every project involving a land disturbance activity. No building permit, site plan approval, subdivision approval, or permit to allow land disturbing activities shall be issued and no earth disturbing activity shall commence until approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Projects coordinated by Ramsey County or Mn/DOT do not require a permit; however, the PWD shall be notified of the project and be provided a copy of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, as well as an estimated schedule for commencement and completion. The PWD shall notify the designated contact if erosion control measures should fail or require maintenance with the expectation that the deficiencies will be corrected. If no permit has been obtained, a stop work order may be issued on the construction and a fine may be issued in an amount equal to twice the required permit fee. A completed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and permit application shall be submitted before construction will be allowed to resume. Obtaining a permit does not exempt the Permittee from obtaining permits required by other governmental agencies. Subd. 2 Application Fee. The Permittee shall submit an application fee as specified on the City's Fee Schedule as adopted and revised annually by the City Council by ordinance. The fee is non-refundable and shall cover any review costs accrued within one (1) year of the date of payment. Subd. 3 Criteria. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall minimize soil erosion or sediment from damaging adjacent land. A Permittee engaged in a Land Disturbance Activity shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan that will minimize soil erosion or sediment from damaging adjacent land, bodies of water, watercourses or wetlands to the PWD for approval. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall address the following criteria: A. Conform to the natural limitations presented by topography and soil so as to create the least potential for soil erosion; B. Stabilize all exposed soils and soil stockpiles; 38 198575v4 C. Establish permanent vegetation; D. Prevent sediment damage to adjacent properties and other designated areas; E. Schedule of erosion and sediment control practices; F. Use of temporary sedimentation basins; G. Stabilization of steep slopes and bluffs; H. Control the storm water leaving a site; I. Stabilize all waterways and outlets; J. Protect storm sewers and outfalls from the entrance of sediment, debris and trash; K. Control waste, such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter and sanitary waste that may adversely impact water quality; L. When working in or crossing water bodies, take precautions to contain sediment; M. Re-stabilize utility construction areas as soon as possible; N. Protect paved roads from sediment and mud brought in from access routes; O. Dispose of temporary erosion and sediment control measures; P. Maintain all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices; and Q. Removal of sediment from streets at the end of each day Subd. 4 Plan Content. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan content shall include the following unless waived by the PWD: A. Contact information for the Permittee; B. Address of site where the land disturbing activity is proposed; C. Signature(s) of the owner(s) of the site or an authorized representative; D. Project description including the nature and purpose of the land disturbing activity and the amount of grading involved; 39 198575v4 E. Phasing of construction and timeline; F. Existing and proposed site conditions, including topography, vegetation, and drainage; G. Adjacent areas, neighboring streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads, etc., which might be affected by the land disturbing activity; H. Soil data including soil names, mapping units, erodibility; I. Critical erosion areas, which are areas on the site that have potential for serious erosion problems; J. Erosion and sediment control measures to be used on the site, both during and after the construction process; K. Temporary and Permanent stabilization to show how the site will be stabilized during and after construction (is completed), including specifications; L. Storm water management to show how storm runoff will be managed, including methods to be used if the development will result in increased peak rates or volume of runoff; M. Maintenance and schedule of regular inspections and repair of erosion and sediment control structures; and, N. Any calculations that were made for the design of such items as sediment basins, diversions, waterways, and other applicable practices. O. A land disturbance activity equal to or greater than one (1) acre is required to comply with the conditions of the NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater General Permit, Part IV – Construction Activity Requirements. 1520.02 Review of Permit Application Subd. 1 General. The PWD shall review the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to ensure compliance with the erosion and sediment control practice specifications and erosion and sediment control practices. Subd. 2 Permit Approval. If the PWD determines that the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan meets the requirements of this ordinance, the PWD shall issue a permit, valid for a specified period of time that authorizes the land disturbance activity contingent on the implementation and completion of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. 40 198575v4 Subd. 3 Permit Denial. If the PWD determines that the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan does not meet the requirements of this article, the PWD shall not issue a permit for the land disturbance activity. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be resubmitted for approval before the land disturbance activity begins. No land use and building permits shall be issued until the Permittee has an approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. 1520.03 Escrow Requirement. After approval of an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, the PWD may require the Permittee to escrow a sum of money sufficient to ensure the installation, completion, maintenance, inspection, and enforcement of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and practices. Escrow amounts shall be set by Ordinance in the City fee schedule. Upon project completion, the remaining escrow shall be returned to the Permittee. 1520.04 Modifications of Plan. An approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan may be modified upon submission of an application for modification to the PWD and subsequent approval by the PWD. In reviewing such application, the PWD may require additional reports and data. Section 1530 – Implementation and Maintenance 1530.01 Implementation and Maintenance of Plan. All storm water pollution controls noted on the approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be installed before commencing the land disturbing activity and shall not be removed without PWD approval or approval of a Certificate of Completion. Noncompliance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall constitute grounds for an order from the PWD to halt all construction. 1530.02 Implementation. The plan implementation shall incorporate the following: Subd. 1 Existing vegetation shall be retained whenever feasible. Subd. 2 Land shall be disturbed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and sediment control can be provided and maintained as construction progresses. The area exposed shall be stabilized in conformance with best management practices and with the maintenance requirements in the NPDES General Construction Permit. Soil stabilization measures should be selected to be appropriate for the time of year, site conditions, and estimated duration of use. Subd. 3 The location of areas not to be disturbed shall be identified with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc. before construction begins. 41 198575v4 Subd. 4 Down-gradient sediment controls shall be in place before up-gradient land disturbing activity begins. Subd. 5 All storm drains, inlets and outfalls shall be protected until all sources of potential discharge are stabilized. Subd. 6 Temporary stockpiles shall have effective sediment control and cannot be placed in surface waters or storm water conveyance systems. Subd. 7 Vehicle tracking from the site shall be minimized with the use of stone pads, concrete or steel wash racks, or equivalent systems. Subd. 8 Street sweeping shall be used if BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment from being tracked into the street. 1530.03 Responsibility. The Permittee shall be responsible for proper operation and maintenance of all stormwater pollution controls and soil stabilization measures in conformance with best management practices and with the maintenance requirements in the NPDES General Construction Permit. The Permittee is responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary erosion at the site. The Permittee is responsible until another Permittee has assumed control over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized or the site has undergone final stabilization, and has received an approved Certificate of Completion. The Permittee is responsible for maintenance, clean-up and all damages caused by flooding of the site or surrounding area due to in-place erosion or sediment control. Section 1540 – Enforcement 1540.01 Erosion and Sediment Control Permit Enforcement. If the PWD determines that erosion and sedimentation control is not being implemented or maintained according to the approved Plan, the Permittee will be notified and provided with a list of corrective work to be performed. Notification may be given by personal delivery upon the Permittee, or an officer, partner, manager or designated representative of the Permittee, or by e- mail or facsimile by sending such notice to the e-mail address or facsimile number provided by the Permittee. Upon the receipt of a Non-Compliance Notice from the PWD, the Permittee shall undertake a corrective action. Subd. 1 Types of Corrective Actions. A. Violations Contained on the Construction Site. Permittee shall complete clean- up and restoration within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the Non-Compliance Notice. 42 198575v4 B. Violation Impacting Adjoining Property. Permittee shall develop and complete a clean-up and restoration plan within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of a Non-Compliance Notice unless the affected adjoining property owner refuses Permittee access to the adjoining property. In all cases, clean-up and restoration shall be completed within seven (7) days of receipt of the Non-Compliance Notice, unless an extension is granted by the PWD. C. Violations Impacting Streets, Wetlands, or Water Bodies. Permittee shall develop and implement a clean-up and restoration plan immediately upon receipt of a Non- Compliance Notice. Subd. 2 Failure to Comply. If Permittee fails to implement the Plan or complete any required corrective action in a timely manner, the City may pursue one or more of the remedies specified herein. All costs incurred by the City shall be paid by Permittee. Escrow funds may be used by the City for this purpose and, if such funds do not adequately cover the City's cost, the Permittee shall reimburse the City for any deficiency before continuing work on the construction site. The City may: A. Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Issue a stop work order, ceasing all land disturbance activity on the site until such time as corrective measures are completed to the satisfaction of the PWD. C. Revoke any permit issued by the City to the Permittee for the Site. D. Direct the correction of the deficiency by City forces or by a separate contract. E. Obtain a Compliance Order from the appropriate court. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. PASSED and ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________, 201__, by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: 43 198575v4 _____________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Published in the ____________________ on _______________, 2018. DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Tracker Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should provide further direction on items presented on the Council Request Tracker. Background City Council will receive a verbal update on items the Council has previously directed staff to research and/or bring forward. Attachment N/A AGENDA ITEM –1C MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: SLWA Follow Up Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should provide further direction on the Service Line Warranties of America (SLWA) agreement with the City. Background At the August 13, 2018 Regular City Council Meeting, the City Council directed staff to add the SLWA agreement to the next Work Session. At the July Work Session, The City Council directed City Staff to contact our SLWA representative, and inform them that the City Council will need to authorize all future mailings. SLWA confirmed with Staff that no mailings will be sent without prior authorization by the City Council. SLWA did note they will be beginning the planning process at the end of the month for the fall campaign, but also acknowledged that prior to that campaign the City will need to authorize any mailings. Attachment N/A AGENDA ITEM –1D MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Sympathy/Greeting Card and Floral Arrangement Policy Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should provide further direction regarding a sympathy/greeting card and floral arrangement policy. Background The Council has previously asked City Staff to bring forward a policy to address when the City will send out sympathy/greeting cards. The City has also historically sent floral arrangements in certain cases, which has also been added to this policy. A draft policy has been attached to this memo. Attachment Attachment A: Sympathy/Greeting Card and Floral Arrangement Policy AGENDA ITEM –1E MEMORANDUM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Greeting/Sympathy Card and Floral Arrangement Policy This document will establish a process for sending greeting/sympathy cards and floral arrangements by the City of Arden Hills. The City of Arden Hills staff, unless otherwise directed by the City Council, will send a greeting and/or sympathy card and/or floral arrangement in the following circumstances. -Council members / City Staff / Committee and Commission members: -First baby: A card and floral arrangement (up to $50) -Employee hospitalization: A card and floral arrangement (up to $50) -Funeral (immediate family only): A card and floral arrangement (up to $90) -Other elected officials representing the City / previous Council members / previous Committee and Commission members / other members of the public deemed by the City Council to have had a significant connection with the City: -Funeral: A sympathy card will be sent to the family on behalf of the City of Arden Hills Purpose By instituting this procedure, it will help ensure consistency on when the City sends a greeting and/or sympathy card to the City Council, City Staff, Commission/Committee members, and other members of the public. AGENDA ITEM – 1F MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director SUBJECT: Preliminary General Fund Budget Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Staff is requesting City Council to review and provide feedback to the attached preliminary General Fund budget for the 2019 fiscal year. Background Annually, City staff prepares and submits a preliminary budget to the City Council for review and feedback. Attached to this memo is the City’s preliminary General Fund budget for the 2019 fiscal year. Each department provided their respective forecasts for this budget. The proposed 2019 budget is $5,519,250, an increase of $342,494 or 6.6%. For the purpose of this discussion, there is no tax levy increase reflected in the budget. As presented, the General Fund Budget is underfunded by $368,130, with $237,225 of the shortfall being carried over from the 2018 budget and $130,905 from current year projections. This practice is not sustainable in the long term. A tax levy increase of 9.72% would be needed to balance the budget in 2019. According to information provided by Ramsey County, the median home value in Arden Hills will increase from $333,800 for 2018 taxes to $346,900 for 2019 taxes, an increase of 3.9%, which is less than the countywide average of 7.4%. The annual impact of different levels of the City levy increase to a median valued home is as follows: % LEVY $ LEVY $ % CHANGE CHANGE 2018 2019 2018 2019 CHANGE CHANGE 0% $0 $333,800 $346,900 $834 $831 ($3) ‐0.4% 1% $37,868 $840 $6 0.7% 2% $75,738 $849 $15 1.8% 3% $113,608 $858 $24 2.9% 4% $151,478 $867 $33 3.9% 9.72% $368,088 $919 $85 10.1% HOME VALUE CITY TAX Fiscal disparities for the City decreased by 2.8% while the local taxable value increased by 5.1%, which shows a slight shift in the tax burden to non-residential properties. What this means is that the $3 net change in the first line of the preceding table is made up of the following: Change due to decrease in fiscal disparities $2 Change due to increase in taxable values ($5) Net Change ($3) The 2019 preliminary budget is currently being prepared assuming a 2.5% wage adjustment for all staff. This is what was approved for the I.O.U.E. union members. There is also a 10% increase assumed for health and dental premiums and a 3% increase for disability insurance. Two new positions have been included in the proposed budget. They are the Senior Engineering Tech and the Recreation Programmer. A majority of the cost for the Sr. Eng. Tech should be offset by a decrease in contracted services from WSB. Other changes to personnel costs include an increase to council pay, an increase in hours for the part-time Communications Coordinator because the 2018 budget only had it listed at 20 hours per week and the position was hired at 25 hours per week, and a change in the allocation between departments and funds for the Community Development Director and the City Planner. 2019 budget information was received from Ramsey County and Lake Johanna Fire Department for public safety. The police contract is expected to rise by 4.1%, or $48,475 for 2019. The main reason for this is the addition of another investigator. Ramsey County has plans to add another investigator in 2020. The fire costs are expected to rise by 5.5%, or $29,680 for 2019. Earlier this year, Council expressed an interest in accomplishing more patching and overlay work during 2019 to help lengthen the life of the City’s roads. An additional $100,000 was added to the 2019 budget to support this endeavor. A summary of the major changes is as follows: Description Effect on General Fund Increase Street Maintenance for patching and overlays (100,000)                              Add Recreation Programmer (66,480)                                Step/benefit increases (51,890)                                Ramsey County police contract (48,475)                                Add Sr. Engineering Tech (43,830)                                Lake Johanna Fire Department budget (29,680)                                COLA 2.5% (22,140)                                (362,495)                              In addition to the expenditure items listed above, permit revenues (building, mechanical, electrical and plan check fees) are expected to increase by $191,770. This is based on an analysis of 2015 – 2018 revenues. Discussion Staff is respectfully requesting the City Council to review the preliminary budget and provide feedback for future budget meetings. The 2019 proposed levy and public meeting date need to be set prior to the end of September 2018. Attachments A. Preliminary 2019 General Fund Budget PowerPoint Presentation B. Preliminary 2019 General Fund Budget Preliminary2019 General Fund BudgetPRESENTED TO ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCILAUGUST 20, 2018 Overall General Fund Budget Summary2016 2017 2018 2019 $ Increase % IncreaseActual Actual Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)REVENUESTaxes 3,260,537$  3,541,704$  3,795,042$ 3,795,470$ 428$       0.01%Special assessments1,332     1,265     2,000     1,220      (780)  ‐39.00%Licenses and permits598,687     729,198     324,600     505,020      180,420    55.58%Intergovernmental131,914     151,425     133,179     153,220      20,041      15.05%Charges for services700,855     718,906     585,704     604,160      18,456      3.15%Fines & forfeits31,868  29,988  34,000  30,340   (3,660)  ‐10.76%Investment earnings52,161  36,012  55,000  47,230   (7,770)  ‐14.13%Miscellaneous25,636  22,642  10,006  14,460   4,454    44.51%TOTAL REVENUES4,802,989$ 5,231,139$ 4,939,531$ 5,151,120$ 211,589$   4.28%EXPENDITURESGeneral government1,082,313$ 1,076,354$ 1,305,550$ 1,282,630$ (22,920)$    ‐1.76%Public safety1,981,507  2,058,035  2,156,172  2,234,400   78,228      3.63%Public works479,814     443,632     587,872     719,400      131,528    22.37%Parks & recreation621,834     618,613     707,162     862,820      155,658    22.01%Transfers out775,121     340,000     420,000     420,000      ‐    0.00%TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,940,589$ 4,536,635$ 5,176,756$ 5,519,250$ 342,494$   6.62%NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (137,600)$   694,505$     (237,225)$   (368,130)$   (130,905)$ 55.18%1 Budget AssumptionsDescription Effect on General Fund Increase Street Maintenance budget for patching and overlays (100,000)         2.5% Cost of Living Adjustment, 10% increase in premiums, step increases (74,030)           Add Recreation Programmer position (66,480)           Ramsey County police contract ‐ 1 investigator position added (48,475)           Add Senior Engineering Technician position (43,830)           Lake Johanna Fire Department budget (29,680)           Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plan Review revenue 191,770          Major changes to budget (170,725)         2 Revenues by Source2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetProperty Taxes3,786,940$                 (2)$                                0.0%Other Taxes9,750                           (350)                             ‐3.5%Licenses & Permits505,020                      180,420                      55.6%Intergovernmental153,220                      20,041                         15.0%Charges for Services604,160                      18,456                         3.2%Fines & Forfeits30,340                         (3,660)                          ‐10.8%Investment Earnings47,230                         (7,770)                          ‐14.1%Miscellaneous14,460                         4,454                           44.5%Total Revenues5,151,120$                 211,589$                    4.3%3 General Fund Revenues4 Expenditures by Department2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetGeneral Government 1,282,630$                  (22,920)$                      ‐1.8%Public Safety 2,234,400                    78,228                          3.6%Public Works 719,400                       131,528                       22.4%Parks & Recreation 862,820                       155,658                       22.0%Transfers 420,000                       ‐                                     0.0%Total Expenditures 5,519,250$                  342,494$                     6.6%5 Expenditures by Type2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetPersonnel Services 1,625,020$                  199,294$                     14.0%Supplies & Materials 127,400                       9,554                            8.1%Other Services & Charges 3,346,830                    133,646                       4.2%Transfers 420,000                       ‐                                     0.0%Total Expenditures 5,519,250$                  342,494$                     6.6%6 General Fund Expenditures7 Personnel Services2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetGeneral Government 579,080$                     70,980$                       14.0%Public Safety 275,520                       2,294                            0.8%Public Works 259,660                       25,460                          10.9%Parks & Recreation 510,760                       100,560                       24.5%Total Expenditures 1,625,020$                  199,294$                     14.0%COLA/step/benefit increases 73,314$           Sr. Eng. Tech.43,830             Rec. Programmer66,480             Council wages6,030               Allocations9,640               199,294$        8 Personnel FTE’s20182019BudgetRequestGeneral Government5.906.01Public Safety2.612.56Public Works11.9412.77Parks & Recreation4.065.29Total24.5026.63Part‐time Communications Coordinator was budgeted at 50% in 2018 budget but position was hired at 62.5% fte.Add new Senior Engineering Technician.Add new Recreation Programmer.9 Supplies & Materials2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetGeneral Government 29,800$                       (1,050)$                        ‐3.4%Public Safety 1,200                            (1,846)                           ‐60.6%Public Works 25,600                          ‐                                     0.0%Parks & Recreation 70,800                          12,450                          21.3%Total Expenditures 127,400$                     9,554$                          8.1%10 Other Services & Charges2019 Amount Over(Under) % Change OverBudget 2018 Budget 2018 BudgetGeneral Government 673,750$                     (92,850)$                      ‐12.1%Public Safety 1,957,680                    77,780                          4.1%Public Works 434,140                       106,068                       32.3%Parks & Recreation 281,260                       42,648                          17.9%Total Expenditures 3,346,830$                  133,646$                     4.2%Increase mainly due to $100,000 addition to Street Maintenance budget for patching and overlays.Ramsey County police contract ‐ $48,475 increase.Lake Johanna Fire Department budget ‐ $29,680 increase.11 Effect on Median Value Home(City Tax only)LEVY$ %CHANGE 2018 2019 2018 2019 CHANGE CHANGE0%333,800$  346,900$ 834$  831$ (3)$         ‐0.4%1%840$ 6$           0.7%2%849$ 15$         1.8%3%858$ 24$         2.9%4%867$ 33$         3.9%HOME VALUECITY TAX12 Tax Levy HistoryYEAR TAX LEVY % CHANGE TAX RATE % CHANGE2010 3,016,465    22.672%2011 3,040,964    0.8% 24.187% 6.7%2012 3,096,994    1.8% 25.544% 5.6%2013 3,191,230    3.0% 27.931% 9.3%2014 3,257,456    2.1% 27.950% 0.1%2015 3,359,775    3.1% 27.294% ‐2.3%2016 3,478,775    3.5% 26.539% ‐2.8%2017 3,641,290    4.7% 27.211% 2.5%2018 3,786,942    4.0% 25.532% ‐6.2%13 Budgeted vs Actual Surplus (Deficit)YEAR BUDGET ACTUAL2012 (124,954)        199,583         2013 (46,100)          14,795           2014 (162,415)        (19,768)         2015 (35,305)          736,465         2016 (725,446)        (137,600)       2017 (195,955)        694,505         2018 (237,225)        TBDThere was a transfer out of surplus funds from 2015 in 2016.Staff will recommend a transfer out of surplus funds from 2017 in 2018.14 Council FeedbackQuestions?Comments?Additional meetings?Budget format?15 2016 2017 2018 2019 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) REVENUES Taxes Property taxes 3,252,297$     3,532,773$     3,786,942$     3,786,940$     (2)$ 0.00% Other taxes 8,240               8,931               8,100               8,530               430 5.31% Special assessments 1,332               1,265               2,000               1,220               (780) ‐39.00% Licenses and permits 598,687           729,198           324,600           505,020           180,420           55.58% Intergovernmental 131,914           151,425           133,179           153,220           20,041             15.05% Charges for services 700,855           718,906           585,704           604,160           18,456             3.15% Fines & forfeits 31,868             29,988             34,000             30,340             (3,660)              ‐10.76% Investment earnings 52,161             36,012             55,000             47,230             (7,770)              ‐14.13% Miscellaneous 25,636             22,642             10,006             14,460             4,454               44.51% TOTAL REVENUES 4,802,989$     5,231,139$     4,939,531$     5,151,120$     211,589$         4.28% EXPENDITURES General government Mayor & council 65,051$           56,513$           67,500$           68,760$           1,260$             1.87% Administration 173,781           260,304           327,500           331,010           3,510               1.07% Elections 21,137             21,137             23,000             23,000             ‐ 0.00% Finance 172,268           192,663           176,300           191,820           15,520             8.80% TCAAP 242,663           98,883             170,000           172,590           2,590               1.52% Planning & Zoning 173,853           197,976           266,250           223,610           (42,640)            ‐16.02% Government Buildings 233,560           248,879           275,000           271,840           (3,160)              ‐1.15% Total general government 1,082,313        1,076,354        1,305,550        1,282,630        (22,920)            ‐1.76% Public safety Police 1,089,185        1,177,494        1,194,775        1,242,250        47,475             3.97% Dispatch 67,780             68,832             65,175             68,500             3,325               5.10% Fire 495,216           514,468           544,000           573,680           29,680             5.46% Emergency Management 2,966               3,364               9,476               3,920               (5,556)              ‐58.63% Protective Inspections 326,360           293,877           342,746           346,050           3,304               0.96% Total public safety 1,981,507        2,058,035        2,156,172        2,234,400        78,228             3.63% Public works Street Maintenance 479,814           443,632           587,872           719,400           131,528           22.37% Total public works 479,814           443,632           587,872           719,400           131,528           22.37% Parks & recreation Recreation 275,039           250,898           266,650           342,890           76,240             28.59% Park Maintenance 346,795           367,715           440,512           519,930           79,418             18.03% Total parks & recreation 621,834           618,613           707,162           862,820           155,658           22.01% Other Financing Uses Transfers Out 775,121           340,000           420,000           420,000           ‐ 0.00% 775,121           340,000           420,000           420,000           ‐ 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,940,589$     4,536,635$     5,176,756$     5,519,250$     342,494$         6.62% NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (137,600)$       694,505$         (237,225)$       (368,130)$        CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY 2019 BUDGET 1 2019 BUDGET ‐ GENERAL FUND ‐ SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES ‐ DETAIL BY FUNCTION 2016 2017 2018 2019 $ Increase % Increase Actual Actual Budget Proposed (Decrease) (Decrease) Mayor & council Personnel Expenses 31,160$          31,165$          31,200$          37,210$          6,010$              19.26% Supplies and Materials 48                     166                  50                     150                  100                   200.00% Other Services and Charges 33,842             25,182             36,250             31,400             (4,850)               ‐13.38% 65,051$          56,513$          67,500$          68,760$          1,260$              1.87% Administration Personnel Expenses 83,780$          83,423$          194,200$       215,300$       21,100$          10.87% Supplies and Materials 423                  448                  500                  550                  50                      10.00% Other Services and Charges 89,578             176,433          132,800         115,160         (17,640)           ‐13.28% 173,781$       260,304$       327,500$       331,010$       3,510$             1.07% Elections Other Services and Charges 21,137$          21,137$          23,000$          23,000$          ‐$                      0.00% 21,137$          21,137$          23,000$          23,000$          ‐$                      0.00% Finance Personnel Expenses 61,677$          66,312$          51,000$          53,800$          2,800$              5.49% Supplies and Materials 16,490             19,000             23,100             23,100             ‐                         0.00% Other Services and Charges 94,102             107,351          102,200         114,920         12,720             12.45% 172,268$       192,663$       176,300$       191,820$       15,520$          8.80% TCAAP Personnel Expenses 61,188$          43,726$          107,700$       86,490$         (21,210)$         ‐19.69% Supplies and Materials 555                  ‐                        1,000               ‐                        (1,000)               ‐100.00% Other Services and Charges 180,920         55,156            61,300            86,100            24,800             40.46% 242,663$       98,883$         170,000$       172,590$       2,590$             1.52% Planning & Zoning Personnel Expenses 111,751$       40,044$         83,500$         145,490$       61,990$          74.24% Supplies and Materials 14                     ‐                        200                  ‐                        (200)                  ‐100.00% Other Services and Charges 62,088             157,933          182,550         78,120            (104,430)         ‐57.21% 173,853$       197,976$       266,250$       223,610$       (42,640)$         ‐16.02% Government Buildings Personnel Expenses 22,156$          42,720$          40,500$          40,790$          290$                 0.72% Supplies and Materials 3,951               4,426               6,000               6,000               ‐                         0.00% Other Services and Charges 207,453         201,733         228,500         225,050         (3,450)              ‐1.51% 233,560$       248,879$       275,000$       271,840$       (3,160)$           ‐1.15% Police Other Services and Charges 1,089,185$    1,177,494$    1,194,775$    1,242,250$    47,475$          3.97% 1,089,185$    1,177,494$    1,194,775$    1,242,250$    47,475$          3.97% Dispatch Other Services and Charges 67,780$          68,832$          65,175$          68,500$          3,325$              5.10% 67,780$          68,832$          65,175$          68,500$          3,325$              5.10% Fire Other Services and Charges 495,216$       514,468$       544,000$       573,680$       29,680$          5.46% 495,216$       514,468$       544,000$       573,680$       29,680$          5.46% Emergency Management Personnel Expenses 11$                  30$                  2,726$             2,820$             94$                   3.45% Other Services and Charges 2,955               3,335               6,750               1,100               (5,650)               ‐83.70% 2,966$             3,364$             9,476$             3,920$             (5,556)$            ‐58.63% Protective Inspections Personnel Expenses 233,395$       218,543$       270,500$       272,700$       2,200$             0.81% Supplies and Materials 645                  171                  3,046               1,200               (1,846)               ‐60.60% Other Services and Charges 92,319             75,163             69,200             72,150             2,950                4.26% 326,360$       293,877$       342,746$       346,050$       3,304$             0.96% Street Maintenance Personnel Expenses 177,551$       171,591$       234,200$       259,660$       25,460$          10.87% Supplies and Materials 67,524            47,424            25,600            25,600            ‐                        0.00% Other Services and Charges 234,739         224,617         328,072         434,140         106,068          32.33% 479,814$       443,632$       587,872$       719,400$       131,528$        22.37% Recreation Personnel Expenses 175,833$       163,332$       174,000$       235,770$       61,770$          35.50% Supplies and Materials 21,938             19,223             22,250             26,250             4,000                17.98% Other Services and Charges 77,267             68,343             70,400             80,870             10,470              14.87% 275,039$        250,898$        266,650$       342,890$       76,240$          28.59% Park Maintenance Personnel Expenses 191,823$       183,904$       236,200$       274,990$       38,790$          16.42% Supplies and Materials 37,104            26,384            36,100            44,550            8,450               23.41% Other Services and Charges 117,868         157,426         168,212         200,390         32,178             19.13% 346,795$       367,715$       440,512$       519,930$       79,418$          18.03% Transfers Out 775,121$       340,000$       420,000$       420,000$       ‐$                     0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,940,589$    4,536,635$    5,176,756$    5,519,250$    342,494$        6.62% 2 2018 PERCENT ORIGINAL OVER(UNDER) Total By Program ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 2018 BUDGET City Council $65,051 $56,513 $67,500 $68,760 1.9% City Administration 173,781 260,304 327,500 331,010 1.1% Elections 21,137 21,137 23,000 23,000 0.0% Finance 172,268 192,663 176,300 191,820 8.8% TCAAP 242,663 98,883 170,000 172,590 1.5% Planning & Zoning 173,853 197,976 266,250 223,610 -16.0% Government Buildings 233,560 248,879 275,000 271,840 -1.1% Totals 1,082,313 1,076,354 1,305,550 1,282,630 -1.8% Total By Classification Personnel Services 371,712 307,389 508,100 579,080 14.0% Commodities 21,481 24,040 30,850 29,800 -3.4% Contractual Services 689,119 744,926 766,600 673,750 -12.1% Capital Outlay 0000 N/A Other Charges 0000 N/A Totals 1,082,313 1,076,354 1,305,550 1,282,630 -1.8% Staffing Full-time equivalents 4.51 4.69 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA GENERAL GOVERNMENT SUMMARY EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS 2016 2017 2019 2016 ACTUAL 2017 ACTUAL 2018 ORIGINAL BUDGET 2019 ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 ThousandsExpenditures 3 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Mayor & Council 41100 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 31,160$ 31,165$ 31,200$ 37,210$ Commodities 48 166 50 150 Contractual Services 33,842 25,182 36,250 31,400 Total 65,051$ 56,513$ 67,500$ 68,760$ Percent Change (-13.1%) 19.4% 1.9% Expenditures by Classification The Mayor and City Council are responsible for the formulation of policy and the passage of laws governing the City of Arden Hills. Members participate in various committees, as well as direct staff, through the City Administrator, as to their overall goals for the City. This department provides for Mayor and Council compensation, Council meetings and work sessions, management consultants, memberships, and publishing legal notices. Participation in NYFS is included in this budget, as is funding for the City Council Retreat Facilitator. In 2019, the Mayor and Council budget is proposed to increase by 1.9% or $1,260. Fund # : Activity # : 2019 BUDGET 1. Adopt policies and ordinances consistent with Council's position on growth, zoning and financial strategy. 2. Continue to work on the redevelopment of the TCAAP property. Creating funding sources to build reserve balances to fund future capital improvements while maintaining current City services. 54% 46% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 4 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Administration 41300 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 83,780$ 83,423$ 194,200$ 215,300$ Commodities 423 448 500 550 Contractual Services 89,578 176,433 132,800 115,160 Total 173,781$ 260,304$ 327,500$ 331,010$ Percent Change 49.8% 25.8% 1.1% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 1.80 1.85 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : City Administration provides the overall direction of the City, as determined by the City Council. The City Administrator serves as Chief Administrative Officer for the City, ensuring that laws, ordinances, and resolutions of the City Council are enforced and implemented. The Administration Department is responsible for administering Council policies, coordinating Council agendas, and providing support to other functional areas within the City. The 2019 Administration budget is increasing by 1.1% over 2018. The department is fully staffed and consultant costs have been removed. 1. Assist City Council in setting policies and procedures in accordance with Council's position. 2. Provide direction and leadership on major city projects, budget management, oversee performance evaluation and long-range planning. 1. Long-range planning to maintain current City services while creating funding sources for reserves. 2. Long-range comprehensive TCAAP planning. 65% 35% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 5 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Elections 41410 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services 21,137 21,137 23,000 23,000 Total 21,137$ 21,137$ 23,000$ 23,000$ Percent Change 0.0% 8.8% 0.0% Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department covers the cost of administering all Federal, State and Municipal elections. This includes the preparation of any and all absentee ballots, organizing the polling places, election judges, and vote tabulations. The City contracts with Ramsey County for all the required election services. The Elections budget has a zero percent increase for FY19. Stay current on election laws. Stay current on election laws. 100% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 6 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Finance 41500 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 61,677$ 66,312$ 51,000$ 53,800$ Commodities 16,490 19,000 23,100 23,100 Contractual Services 94,102 107,351 102,200 114,920 Total 172,268$ 192,663$ 176,300$ 191,820$ Percent Change 11.8% (-8.5%) 8.8% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 0.47 0.49 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Conducts the financial affairs of the City in accordance with the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This includes protecting the assets of the City, the initiation of financial plans, investment and debt management, review and implementation of internal controls, and accounting for financial transactions including accounts payable, accounts receivable and payroll. This budget increased by 8.8% in 2019. Contractual services is increasing due to the Technology Fund allocation. 1. Continue working to refine the financial management plan for the City. 2. Continue to produce a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and reports for the public (Popular Annual Finance Report - PAFR) that receive the GFOA's award for excellence in reporting. 3. Provide meaningful and timely financial reports and information to Council, Commissions and other City Departments. 1. Implement improved reporting procedures to inform Council, Commissions and Departments. 2. Work with other Departments to find ways to reduce costs of City operations. 3. Analyze and implement ways to reduce transaction processing and costs. 28% 12% 60% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 7 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: TCAAP 41600 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 61,188$ 43,726$ 107,700$ 86,490$ Commodities 555 - 1,000 - Contractual Services 180,920 55,156 61,300 86,100 Total 242,663$ 98,883$ 170,000$ 172,590$ Percent Change (-59.3%) 71.9% 1.5% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 0.43 0.63 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department was established to account for revenue and expenditure activity related to the City’s comprehensive re-use planning at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) site. Ramsey County purchased the property and established a Joint Development Authority (JDA) with the City. Revenues and expenditures are for City costs and are estimated, but placeholders have been included for consulting costs, and staff time has been allocated for the City Administrator, Community Development Director, Planner, and Public Works Director as they act as the City’s support staff to this Authority. The 2019 budget shows an increase of 1.5%, largely due to staff changes and a better estimate of forecasted expenditures. 1. Coordination of TCAAP redevelopment planning activities while continuing to meet the needs of the City of Arden Hills. 2. Work with Ramsey County through the Joint Development Authority (JDA). 1. Economic conditions. 2. Coordinating with multiple entities/players. 50% 50% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 8 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Planning & Zoning 41910 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 111,751$ 40,044$ 83,500$ 145,490$ Commodities 14 - 200 - Contractual Services 62,088 157,933 182,550 78,120 Total 173,853$ 197,976$ 266,250$ 223,610$ Percent Change 13.9% 34.5% (-16.0%) Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 1.43 1.34 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Responsible for all planning and zoning related functions of the City. Activities administered by this department include requests for variances, subdivisions, re-zonings, zoning code amendments, signs, conditional use permits, compliance with City Ordinances and other land use issues. The Planners work closely with Protective Inspections, Code Enforcement, and Community Development. The Planning Commission, consisting of seven members appointed annually by the City Council, meets monthly to review the above requests and to make recommendations to the City Council in an advisory capacity. The budget for 2019 is a total decrease of 16.0% over the 2018 budget. Personnel includes a Director and Planner and related consultant costs have been reduced. 1. Continue to work on Rental Housing registrations. 2. Continue improvements of the City's planning process. 1. Rental Housing registrations. 2. Refine Building Permit process. 3. Research and refine an Administrative Fines process. 65% 35% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 9 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 101 Activity: Government Buildings 41940 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 22,156$ 42,720$ 40,500$ 40,790$ Commodities 3,951 4,426 6,000 6,000 Contractual Services 207,453 201,733 228,500 225,050 Total 233,560$ 248,879$ 275,000$ 271,840$ Percent Change 6.6% 10.5% (-1.1%) Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 0.38 0.38 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department captures all of the operation/maintenance related costs for the City Hall and Government Building facilities. The City entered into a contract with Ramsey County for a joint maintenance facility located just west of City Hall off County Road 96 on Paul Kirkwold Drive. The new facility was completed and occupied as of October 2004. The City’s portion of the Ramsey County maintenance facility is charged to this budget. The 2019 budget is a decrease of 1.1% from the previous year’s budget. Maintain a reputable facility to house meetings and staff. Normal maintenance and repair issues as the building (City Hall) has now been in operation since 2002. 15% 2% 83% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 10 2018 PERCENT ORIGINAL OVER(UNDER) Total By Program ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 2018 BUDGET Police $1,089,185 $1,177,494 $1,194,775 $1,242,250 4.0% Dispatch 67,780 68,832 65,175 68,500 5.1% Fire 495,216 514,468 544,000 573,680 5.5% Emergency Management 2,966 3,364 9,476 3,920 -58.6% Protective Inspections 326,360 293,877 342,746 346,050 1.0% Totals 1,981,507 2,058,035 2,156,172 2,234,400 3.6% Total By Classification Personnel Services 233,406 218,572 273,226 275,520 0.8% Commodities 645 171 3,046 1,200 -60.6% Contractual Services 1,747,456 1,839,292 1,879,900 1,957,680 4.1% Capital Outlay 0000 N/A Other Charges 0000 N/A Totals 1,981,507 2,058,035 2,156,172 2,234,400 3.6% Staffing Full-time equivalents 2.61 2.56 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PUBLIC SAFETY SUMMARY EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS 2016 2017 2019 2016 ACTUAL 2017 ACTUAL 2018 ORIGINAL BUDGET 2019 ORIGINAL BUDGET 1,800 2,100 2,400 ThousandsExpenditures 11 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Safety 101 Activity: Police 42100 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services 1,089,185 1,177,494 1,194,775 1,242,250 Total 1,089,185$ 1,177,494$ 1,194,775$ 1,242,250$ Percent Change 8.1% 1.5% 4.0% Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Law Enforcement services for Arden Hills are provided on a contractual basis with the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department. Animal control services are included in this budget. Arden Hills portion of the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Contracting Communities 2019 budget increased 4.0% over 2018. Animal control costs and boarding are included within this budget. Continue contracting for law enforcement and animal control services through the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department. 1. Resident concerns over police coverage and visibility. 2. Response times. 100% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 12 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Safety 101 Activity: Dispatch 42150 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services 67,780 68,832 65,175 68,500 Total 67,780$ 68,832$ 65,175$ 68,500$ Percent Change 1.6% (-5.3%) 5.1% Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Emergency dispatch services are provided by Ramsey County. Arden Hills portion of the Ramsey County 911 Dispatch Department operation budget increased by 5.1%. Dispatch saw a significant increase in the 2014 and 2015 budget due to CAD costs, but those costs are now leveling out and appropriately budgeted for. Continue contracting dispatch services though Ramsey County. Continue to maintain service levels at a reasonable cost. 100% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 13 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Safety 101 Activity: Fire 42200 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services 495,216 514,468 544,000 573,680 Total 495,216$ 514,468$ 544,000$ 573,680$ Percent Change 3.9% 5.7% 5.5% Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Fire protection for Arden Hills is provided by the Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department on a contractual basis. Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department presently provides services to the cities of Arden Hills, Shoreview, and North Oaks. Arden Hills pays a percentage of operating and capital costs based on a formula approved by the Lake Johanna Fire Department and Arden Hills City Council. Arden Hills’s portion of the Lake Johanna Fire Department operating budget increased 5.5%. This budget reflects increases to operating costs. Continue contracting for fire protection services through Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department. Continue to maintain service levels at a reasonable cost. 100% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 14 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Safety 101 Activity: Emergency Management 42300 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 11$ 30$ 2,726$ 2,820$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services 2,955 3,335 6,750 1,100 Total 2,966$ 3,364$ 9,476$ 3,920$ Percent Change 13.4% 181.7% (-58.6%) Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 0.02 0.02 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Emergency Management coordination for the City is required by the Federal Government. This department works closely with Ramsey County Department of Homeland Security, as well as the Ramsey County Sheriff and Lake Johanna Fire Department. The City contracts with a consultant to provide these services. The 2019 budget is a decrease of 58.6% from the 2018 budget or $5,556. This is based on historical costs and a shifting of the emergency services. 1. Update City's Emergency Response Policy and Procedures. 2. Train staff in emergency management procedures. Coordinate with Ramsey County’s emergency response procedures and policies. 72% 28% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 15 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Safety 101 Activity: Protective Inspections 42400 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 233,395$ 218,543$ 270,500$ 272,700$ Commodities 645 171 3,046 1,200 Contractual Services 92,319 75,163 69,200 72,150 Total 326,360$ 293,877$ 342,746$ 346,050$ Percent Change (-10.0%) 16.6% 1.0% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 2.59 2.54 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department is responsible for all building construction, plumbing, sewer, water and mechanical inspections within the City. Electrical inspections are contracted for with an independent inspection firm. This department is also responsible for enforcement of the Zoning Code and other sections of the City Code of Ordinances. The 2019 operating budget is an increase of 1.0% from the previous year’s budget. 1. Continue implementation of the building codes. 2. Continue to work on Building Permit software to produce Council reports. 1. Managing and prioritizing department workloads. 2. Keep up with rental license inspections of investor owned residential properties. 3. Continue implementation and design of new Building Permit software and reports. 79% 21% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 16 2018 PERCENT ORIGINAL OVER(UNDER) Total By Program ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 2018 BUDGET Streets $479,814 $443,632 $587,872 $719,400 22.4% Totals 479,814 443,632 587,872 719,400 22.4% Total By Classification Personnel Services 177,551 171,591 234,200 259,660 10.9% Commodities 67,524 47,424 25,600 25,600 0.0% Contractual Services 234,739 224,617 328,072 434,140 32.3% Capital Outlay 0000 N/A Other Charges 0000 N/A Totals 479,814 443,632 587,872 719,400 22.4% Staffing Full-time equivalents 2.15 2.38 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS 2016 2017 2019 2016 ACTUAL 2017 ACTUAL 2018 ORIGINAL BUDGET 2019 ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 250 500 750 1,000 ThousandsExpenditures 17 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Public Works 101 Activity: Street Maintenance 43100 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 177,551$ 171,591$ 234,200$ 259,660$ Commodities 67,524 47,424 25,600 25,600 Contractual Services 234,739 224,617 328,072 434,140 Total 479,814$ 443,632$ 587,872$ 719,400$ Percent Change (-7.5%) 32.5% 22.4% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 2.15 2.38 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department is responsible for maintaining City streets, including snowplowing, minor street repair, street signs, and street sweeping. The 2019 operating budget is an increase of 22.4% from the previous year’s budget. An Engineering Tech was added for 2019 and $100,000 was added for additional patching and overly work. 1. Maintain street infrastructure utilizing all available techniques including crack sealing, seal coating, patching and overlays. 2. Recommend a cost effective program for reconstructing/reclaiming street surfaces when maintenance techniques no longer provide the desired results. 3. Maintain and update equipment and vehicles. 1. Implement a capital improvement program for City infrastructure. 2. Balance the public works department needs with available funds. 3. Aging equipment. 4. Increased safety regulation for equipment and vehicles. 36% 4%60% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 18 2018 PERCENT ORIGINAL OVER(UNDER) Total By Program ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 2018 BUDGET Recreation $275,039 $250,898 $266,650 $342,890 28.6% Parks 346,795 367,715 440,512 519,930 18.0% Totals 621,834 618,613 707,162 862,820 22.0% Total By Classification Personnel Services 367,657 347,237 410,200 510,760 24.5% Commodities 59,042 45,607 58,350 70,800 21.3% Contractual Services 195,135 225,769 238,612 281,260 17.9% Capital Outlay 0000 N/A Other Charges 0000 N/A Totals 621,834 618,613 707,162 862,820 22.0% Staffing Full-time equivalents 4.06 5.29 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CULTURE & RECREATION SUMMARY EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS 2016 2017 2019 2016 ACTUAL 2017 ACTUAL 2018 ORIGINAL BUDGET 2019 ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 ThousandsExpenditures 19 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Parks and Recreation 101 Activity: Recreation 45120 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 175,833$ 163,332$ 174,000$ 235,770$ Commodities 21,938 19,223 22,250 26,250 Contractual Services 77,267 68,343 70,400 80,870 Total 275,039$ 250,898$ 266,650$ 342,890$ Percent Change (-8.8%) 6.3% 28.6% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 1.47 2.47 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This department provides all recreational activities to residents of Arden Hills, as well as residents from neighboring communities. The 2019 operating budget is an increase of 28.6% from the previous year’s budget. The Recreation Programmer position has been added back to the budget. To provide recreational activities to residents of Arden Hills. 1. Develop senior programming. 2. Budget constraints. 69% 8% 23% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 20 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Parks and Recreation 101 Activity: Park Maintenance 45200 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 191,823$ 183,904$ 236,200$ 274,990$ Commodities 37,104 26,384 36,100 44,550 Contractual Services 117,868 157,426 168,212 200,390 Total 346,795$ 367,715$ 440,512$ 519,930$ Percent Change 6.0% 19.8% 18.0% Full-Time Equivalent positions - - 2.59 2.82 Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : Responsible for maintenance of City parks and trails as well as administration of the diseased tree/forestry program. This includes maintaining and improving playground and picnic facilities, fertilizing and mowing of grass, maintaining athletic fields, flooding and maintenance of outdoor ice rinks, snow and ice removal, and tree preservation within the parks system of the City. These assets of the City are extensively used by the residents, and improvements must be made to uphold the safety, functionality and beauty the City represents. The 2019 operating budget is an increase of 18.0% from the previous year’s budget. Changes are due to a portion of the new Sr. Engineering Tech being allocated here, $10,000 for Perry Park parking lot and the allocations from the Central Garage and Technology funds have increased. 1. Continue pathway maintenance. 2. Continue implementing City's Comprehensive Park and Trails plan. 1. Other maintenance concerns coming up and not allowing completion of existing projects. 2. Budget constraints for future and existing projects. 53%9% 38% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services 21 2018 PERCENT ORIGINAL OVER(UNDER) Total By Program ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 2018 BUDGET Unallocated $775,121 $340,000 $420,000 $420,000 0.0% Totals 775,121 340,000 420,000 420,000 0.0% Total By Classification Personnel Services 0000 N/A Commodities 0000 N/A Contractual Services 0000 N/A Capital Outlay 0000 N/A Other Charges 775,121 340,000 420,000 420,000 0.0% Totals 775,121 340,000 420,000 420,000 0.0% Staffing Full-time equivalents 0.00 0.00 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA MISCELLANEOUS SUMMARY EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS 2016 2017 2019 2016 ACTUAL 2017 ACTUAL 2018 ORIGINAL BUDGET 2019 ORIGINAL BUDGET 0 200 400 600 800 ThousandsExpenditures 22 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: Unallocated 101 Activity: Transfers 49300 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ Commodities - - - - Contractual Services - - - - Other Charges 775,121 340,000 420,000 420,000 Total 775,121$ 340,000$ 420,000$ 420,000$ Percent Change (-56.1%) 23.5% 0.0% Expenditures by Classification 2019 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : The transfers to other funds budget is utilized to account for the transfer of general fund revenues to other funds within the City financial structure. 2019 includes a transfer of $50,000 to fund Equipment Replacement, $50,000 to fund Public Safety Capital, $120,000 to fund EDA activities, and $200,000 to the PIR Fund. 1. To build reserves for capital equipment replacement. 2. To subsidize infrastructure improvements. Budget constraints. 100% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services Other Charges 23 DATE: August 20, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: TCAAP Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should discuss the status and elements of the ongoing TCAAP negotiations. Background A verbal update will be provided. Attachment N/A AGENDA ITEM –1G MEMORANDUM