HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-20-2020-WSAGENDA ITEMS
New Perspective Senior Living
Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
MnDOT Access Study For Snelling Avenue (Highway 51) Closure Update
MnDOT
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
2021 -2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Environmental Investigation For Snelling Avenue North
Ryan Spencer, WSB
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Fall Recreation Discussion
Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
Council Tracker
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:
David Grant
Councilmembers:
Brenda Holden
Fran Holmes
Dave McClung
Steve Scott
City Council Work Session
Agenda
July 20, 2020
5:00 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651 -792 -7800
Website :
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom
T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it
into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81767219119
This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our
website.
CALL TO ORDER
1.
1.A.
Documents:
1.B.
Documents:
1.C.
Documents:
1.D.
Documents:
1.E.
Documents:
1.F.
Documents:
2.
AGENDA ITEMSNew Perspective Senior LivingMike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMnDOT Access Study For Snelling Avenue (Highway 51) Closure UpdateMnDOT MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDF2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Environmental Investigation For Snelling Avenue North
Ryan Spencer, WSB
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Fall Recreation Discussion
Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
Council Tracker
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott City Council Work SessionAgendaJuly 20, 20205:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81767219119This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents:1.C.
Documents:
1.D.
Documents:
1.E.
Documents:
1.F.
Documents:
2.
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 1 of 6
AGENDA ITEM – 1A
MEMORANDUM
DATE:July 20, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM:Mike Mrosla – Community Development Manager/City Planner
Joe Hartmann, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case: 20-012 – New Perspectives Senior Living
Applicant: Boldt Capital, LLC
Property Address: 12 Pine Tree Drive
Request: Concept Plan Review
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
NA NA NA
The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and
questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is
nonbinding to the City and Applicant (Section 1320.14, Subd 4 of the Zoning Code). A formal
application will be subject to the full review process, including a public hearing with Planning
Commission and City Council review. The Applicant is seeking feedback from the City Council
on the concept plan.
Background
Boldt Capital, LLC (“Applicant”) on behalf of New Perspective Senior Living has submitted an
application for Concept Plan Review for a proposed multi-family senior living project on Lot 1
(Attachment B) of the recently approved subdivision at 12 Pine Tree Drive adjacent to Bethel
University’s Anderson Center. Lot 1 is approximately 6.40 acres. The property is zoned B-2,
General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan.
Neighborhood meeting
Per the Public Notification Process for Land Use Application Policy, a neighborhood meeting
notice was mailed to properties within 1000 feet of the subject property. The informal online
neighborhood meeting was held on July 9th, 2020 with 10 residents in attendance. Questions were
raised regarding how the project was going to be financed, the potential for a traffic study, tree
preservation and the future of the trail that runs through the site, lighting, and general questions
about the construction process.
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 2 of 6
Concept Plan Proposal
Existing Conditions
The Property is currently owned by Bethel University. The Subject Property was subdivided under
a recent Planning Case (PC 20-005). The Applicant is proposing to develop Lot 1 as shown on the
image below and in attachment B. The Subject Property currently features open space with a
wooded area around the wetlands. A segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system runs
through the site.
Proposal:
The Applicant is proposing to build a 177,500 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living
facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 143 units, with 110 units devoted
to independent or assisted care living and 33 units devoted to memory care . The project would
include such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dance hall, salon and spa, bistro/bar and
onsite physical therapy and wellness services (Attachment C). In addition, the applicant we be
making a public trail connection shown in green on the image on the next page. The Applicant is
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 3 of 6
currently working with Rice Creek Watershed District on mitigating the wetland located on the
west side of the Subject Parcel.
Comprehensive Plan
The Subject Property is guided as Community Mixed Use (CMU) in Arden Hills 2040
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Chapter. The area is designated for a broad range of retail,
shopping, services, and office space to meet the needs of the community and surrounding areas.
This area may also include high density housing with a potential density of twelve (12) to twenty
(20) units per acre. The district is expected to have a total of 10 to 50 percent of the uses in the
area be residential. According to the Comprehensive Plan the total area of the CMU is 100 acres.
Currently, there is one residential use at 6.24 acres (1201 County Rd E W) or 6.24% of the total
area. The addition of the proposed of use at 6.4 acres would bring the total use to 12.64%, which
meets the intent of the district.
The Land Use Chapter also discuss the “Guiding Plan for the B-2 District.”In March 2008, the City
completed a visioning and planning process for the B-2 District, which generally includes the
properties near County Road E between Lexington Avenue and Hamline Avenue/Highway 51.
The “Guiding Plan for the B-2 District” is a long-term vision for the future redevelopment of this
corridor. The plan states as this corridor ages, market-initiated redevelopment is anticipated. The
plan also discusses the need for senior housing in community and recommends that any new
construction of senior housing within the B-2 district be built as a combination of senior housing
types (independent care, assisted living and memory case) to form of a senior campus.
Discussion
Density and District Minimum Lot Area per Unit Requirements - Flexibility requested
The Maximum density allowed within the B-2 and CMU District is 20 units per acre. The
Applicants are requesting flexibility with this provision. The total proposed density is 22.3 units
per acre or 143 units. However, the Applicants are proposing a different standard for the 33
memory care units. The Applicant is requesting the memory care units - which consist of private
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 4 of 6
bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to central, shared kitchen, dining and living areas - to be
calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. In some cities ordinances, assisted living, memory care
and skilled nursery units are often considered less than 1 unit because of the lack of facilities that
make a full unit such as a kitchen and living area. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes the
total number of units is 19.7 units per acre or 127 units and is in conformance with the zoning
district and land use plan.
According to City Code Section 1320.06, the Minimum Lot Area per Unit allowed within the B-2
District is 2,178 square feet per unit. The Applicant’s proposal would entail a development with
approximately 1,948 square feet per unit. However, the Applicant is requesting flexibility with this
standard because the 33 memory care units on-site are smaller studio style units and do not have
kitchens and living spaces like standard units. If the memory care units were excluded from the
calculation of Minimum Lot Area per Unit, the development would meet the district provision
with 2,533 square feet per unit.
Building Height- Flexibility requested
Section 1305.04 of the City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance from the average
elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat
roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge
of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs.” These measurements are illustrated in the drawing below.
The Applicant is proposing a building that would be four (4) stories in height. The proposed facility
would have a building height of 55 feet as measured from the finished floor elevation to the
midpoint. Under the City Zoning Code, a building in the B-2 district can have a maximum height
of up to 50 feet to the midpoint, so the Applicants are requesting flexibility for an additional 5 feet
in height. The table below shows building heights for other developments in the community.
Development Name Mid-Point
Summit Development 46 ft.
Johanna Shores Senior Living 56 ft.
E Street Flats 44 ft.
Arden Flats Apartments 55 ft.
Anderson Center 60 ft.
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 5 of 6
Approvals required
The proposed land use application would require the following approvals:
• Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for multiple family dwelling in the B-2 District
• A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for new developments and assisted living
use in the B-2 District. In addition, a PUD would use and for performance standard
flexibility (at a minimum, density, minimum lot area per unit and building height).
The table below provides the performance standards for the B-2 District and the preliminary
analysis for the proposed development:
Ordinance Requirements B-2 District
Standards Proposed Development
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.64 (177,500 sf /278,650 sf)
Maximum Structure Coverage 45% Approx. 21.35 (59,500 sf/ 278,650 sf)
Minimum Landscape Lot Area 20% Appears to comply
Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 feet Approx. 127 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Approx. 27 feet 6 inches
Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/20
feet (total)
Appears to comply
Ordinance Flexibility Requested B-2 District
Standards Development Proposal
Maximum PUD Density 20 units/acre 22.3 units/ acre (143/6.4 acres)
19.7 units/acre (126.5/6.4 acres)*
Minimum Lot Area per Unit 2,178 sf/unit Approx. 1,948 sf (278,650 sf/143 units)
Approx. 2,203 sf (278,650 sf/126.5 units)*
Maximum Building Height 50 ft. Approx. 55 feet
* The Applicant is requesting that memory care units not be calculated as a full unit as units do not have
full kitchens and most memory care residents do not drive.
Council Discussion Items
The following are some items the Council may want to discuss.
1. The Community Mixed Use (CMU) land use category allows for densities of twelve (12)
to 20 units per acre. The Applicant is requesting that memory care units not be calculated
as .5 or half a unit. Below are potential options for Council to consider.
a. Require the Applicant conform to the 20 units per acres.
b. Amend the B2 zoning district language to consider memory care/assisted living
units as half units.
2. Minimum lot area per unit.
3. Building height flexibility.
4. Other items as determined by Council.
Budget Impact
NA
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for July 20, 2020
P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-012 New Perspectives Senior Living - CP
Page 6 of 6
Attachments
A. Location Map
B. Subdivision exhibit with trails and wetlands
C. Applicants concept plan/PowerPoint
Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is
not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall
not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy,
availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN
Statute 466.03 Subd 21.
Location Map
Highway 51Tiller Lane
Ingerson Road
County Road E West
Glenarden RoadSnelling Avenue NorthCarlton Drive
Harriet Avenue
Benton WayPine Tree DriveSkiles Lane
Forest Lane
Dunlap Street NorthArden Place
Cannon AvenueFernwood StreetC
u
m
m
i
n
g
s
L
a
n
e
Hamline Avenue NorthInge
r
s
o
n
C
o
u
r
t Waldon PlaceDellwood AvenueHighway 51PARK
PARK±
Subject Parcel
Attachment A
WetlandWetland
$WWDFKPHQW%
New Perspective Arden HillsConcept Review Attachment C
2 | New Perspective | Date 2019CCompany Overview1
CCompany Overview The Boldt Company is a fourth-generation family and employee-owned company celebrating 130 yearsNational provider of healthcare real estate development and construction servicesRegional offices in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, North Carolina, Oklahoma and CaliforniaNational leader in healthcare facility deliveryCompleted more than $2 billion in development projects since 20002
CCompany Overview Midwest Experience 3
CCompany Overview Established in 1998Company founded after caring for a family member with Alzheimer'sNPSL is a family-owned business24 communities in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and North DakotaOver 2,700 units of independent, assisted and memory careTotal Capital Deployed - $600 Million to-date4
CCompany Overview MMinnesotaBarnumCloquetColumbia HeightsEaganFaribaultHighland ParkMahtomediMankatoMinnetonkaPrior LakeRosevilleWaconiaWoodburyIllinoisSilvisElgin (in development)WisconsinBrookfieldFranklinHowardMequonNorth ShoreSun PrairieTwin PortsWaukeshaWest BendNorth DakotaWest FargoWhere We Are5
BBoldt & New Perspective Joint VentureProject Team & ProcessMarket Analysis•CompleteDevelopment•Boldt / New Perspective Joint VentureArchitecture• Tushie MontgomeryProposed Civil• Kimley – HornConstruction•Boldt ConstructionCapital •Bank Debt• Joint Venture EquityMarketing & Leasing• New PerspectiveAsset Management & Operations• Joint VentureOur Joint Venture manages all aspects of a new project to ensure superior value is delivered to our residents.6
8 | New Perspective | Date 2019WWho We Are7
WWho We Are 8
WWho We Are Years of research have clearly identified four key areas where continued participation provides the best support forsenior health, security & comfort:44 Pillars of Living Life on Purpose9
11 | New Perspective | Date 2019OOur Care Model10
OOur Care ModelContinuum of CareWe develop a community that allows seniors to age-in-place. In addition, we offer multiple forms of care by partnering with local healthcare affiliates.Independent LivingIIIndddddependddddenttLLLiiiviiing11
13 | New Perspective | Date 2019AArden Hills, MN12
Site13
PProject SummaryIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnnggggggProposed ProjectApprox. 143 Units33 Memory Care Units110 Independent/Assisted Living UnitsApprox. 177,500 sq. ft. total35 parking stalls in garage and 75 on siteAmenity Space:Warm Water PoolLibraryMovie TheaterRestaurant-Style Dining RoomDance HallFull-Service Salon and SpaBistro / BarOn-Site Physical Therapy & Wellness Services14
Quality senior housing to meet unmet demand in Arden HillsCurrent unmet demand estimated to be approx. 450 unitsRelationship with Bethel UniversityAlumniVolunteeringNursing studentsTax revenue approx. $400,000+ per yearEmploymentConstruction 15MM in labor expense120 Employees 80 FTE's based on resident acuityCare burden lifted from familiesBBenefits to the Community15
We are committed to replacing the existing trail with a new one that will connect to the Bethel University & Crepeau Nature Preserve trailsAs much as our site allows, we will replace trees and do our best to beautify the surrounding area through landscaping and pondsTTrails and TreesProjected site plan for this project16
))OH[LELOLW\0DWUL[ΖQGHSHQGHQW/LYLQJ%'LVWULFW6WDQGDUGV136/'HYHORSPHQW3URSRVDO0LQLPXP/RW$UHDSHU8QLW VIXQLW$SSUR[ VI VIXQLWV $SSUR[VI VIXQLWV
0D[LPXP%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW IHHW$SSUR[IHHW0D[LPXP)ORRU$UHD5DWLR )$5 $SSUR[ VIVI 0D[LPXP6WUXFWXUH&RYHUDJH $SSUR[ VIVI 0LQLPXP/DQGVFDSH/RW$UHD 0HHWV5HTXLUHPHQW0D[LPXP38''HQVLW\ XQLWVDFUHXQLWVDFUH DFUHV XQLWVDFUH DFUHV
0LQLPXP)URQW<DUG6HWEDFN IHHW $SSUR[IHHW0LQLPXP5HDU<DUG6HWEDFN IHHW $SSUR[IHHWLQFKHV0LQLPXP6LGH<DUG6HWEDFN IHHW PLQ IHHW WRWDO $SSUR[IHHW
$SSOLFDQWZLOOUHTXHVWWKDWPHPRU\FDUHXQLWVQRWEHFDOFXODWHGDVDIXOOXQLWDVXQLWVGRQRWKDYHIXOONLWFKHQVDQGPRVWPHPRU\FDUHUHVLGHQWVGRQRWGULYH17
Preliminary Plat18
SSite PlanIIndependent Living19
NNE RenderingIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg20
SSE RenderingIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg21
SSW RenderingIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg22
EEastEElevationIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg23
WWest ElevationIIndependent Living24
NNorth ElevationIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg25
SSouth ElevationIIndependent Living26
TTypical 1sstFFloor Plan27
TTypical 2nndFFloor PlanIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg28
TTypical 3nndFFloor PlanIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg29
TTypical 4tthFFloor PlanIndependent LivingIIIIInnnnnnddddddeeeeeeppppppeeeeeennnnnddddddeeeeeennnnnntttttLLLLLLiiivvvvvinnnnnngggggg30
$66,67('/,9,1*81,760(025<&$5(81,7667250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($67250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($(;,67,1*67250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($
75$,/(;7(16,2175$,/(;7(16,216$1,7$5<6(:(5($6(0(1761(//,1*$9(&2817<5'(5$0335,9$7('5,9(6$1,7$5<6(:(5($6(0(17
6(7%$&.
6(7%$&.
6(7%$&.
6(7%$&.
352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1((;,67,1*3523(57</,1((;,67,1*3523(57</,1((;,67,1*:(7/$1'$&5(6:(7/$1',03$&7
6+((712'5$:1%< '$7( 1257+&21&(378$/6,7(3/$1$5'(1+,//66(1,25/,9,1*35(3$5(')25 %2/'7$&/(;'$7$6800$5<$5($6352326('3523(57< $&0,15(48,5('3(59,286$5($ 3(5&,7<&2'( 2)3$5&(/ $& 352326('3(59,286$5($$& %8,/',1*)22735,17$5($6) 3$5.,1*5(48,5('3$5.,1*
63$&(6685)$&(3$5.,1* 63$&(681'(5*5281'3$5.,1* 63$&(6727$/352326('3$5.,1* 63$&(6,7,6$17,&,3$7('7+$77+(352326('6,7(3/$1:,//5(48,5(38')/(;,%,/,7<)257+()2//2:,1* 0$;,080%8,/',1*+(,*+7 0$;,08038''(16,7<
3(5&2'( )25(9(5<5(6,'(1763/86)25($&+(03/2<((210$-256+,)73/86)25($&+21&$//0(',&$/352)(66,21$/,7,6$6680('7+(5($5(5(6,'(1763(5522021(5(6,'(173(50(025<&$5(%('21((03/2<((3(581,76$1'0(',&$/352)(66,21$/21&$//3(581,76
$66,67('/,9,1*81,760(025<&$5(81,7667250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($67250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($(;,67,1*67250:$7(50$1$*(0(17$5($61(//,1*$9(&2817<5'(5$0335,9$7('5,9(6$1,7$5<6(:(5($6(0(176$1,7$5<6(:(5($6(0(17352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1((;,67,1*3523(57</,1((;,67,1*3523(57</,1(:$7(50$,1 %<27+(56 352326(':$7(56(59,&(*$60$,1 %<27+(56 *$66(59,&((/(&75,&6(59,&(81'(5*5281'(/(&75,& %<27+(56 6$1,7$5<6(:(56(59,&((;,67,1*6$1,7$5<6(:(5352326('+<'5$17352326('+<'5$17352326('+<'5$17352326(':$7(56(59,&(/(*(1'6+((712'5$:1%< '$7( 1257+&21&(378$/87,/,7<3/$1$5'(1+,//66(1,25/,9,1*35(3$5(')25 %2/'7$&/(;6$1,7$5<6(:(5:$7(50$,181'(5*5281'(/(&75,&*$60$,1(;,67,1*%<27+(56 352326('
CComments and Questions?Thank You!
Page 1 of 2
DATE: July 20, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: MnDOT Access Study for Snelling Avenue (Highway 51)
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources:
$0 $0 NA Council Should Consider
City Council direction is requested regarding proposed intersection modifications along Snelling
Avenue (Highway 51) at Hamline Avenue, Glenhill Road and Lydia Avenue.
Background
At the November 18, 2019 City Council work session, MnDOT representative Mark Lindeberg
presented information regarding the temporary median closure along Snelling Avenue (Highway 51)
at Hamline Avenue. Mr. Lindeberg also discussed MnDOT’s plans to study access along the Snelling
Avenue corridor, including the intersection at Lydia Avenue. As part of this discussion, the City
Council requested that MnDOT conduct a public engagement process to share information regarding
the assess study and receive input from area residents.
MnDOT conducted a virtual open house meeting on May 19 to describe access modifications being
considered as part of the study and answer questions. The presentation slides used for the open house
meeting are provided in Attachment A. A summary of questions and comments received from the
public in response to the open house meeting is provided in Attachment B.
MnDOT has indicated a preference for the current temporary median closure at Hamline Avenue to
remain permanently closed. Other modifications being considered by MnDOT along Snelling
Avenue include the following:
Close access from Glenhill Road to northbound Snelling Avenue
Reconfigure median opening at Glenhill Road to prevent illegal U-turns
Maintain access from Northbound Snelling to westbound Glenhill Road
Extend southbound left-turn lane at Lydia by 500 feet in 2022
Extend southbound left-turn lanes at County C and C2
AGENDA ITEM – 1B
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
Fay Simer, MnDOT North Area Coordinator, is scheduled to participate in the July 20 City Council
work session to discuss this topic prior to MnDOT determining the final modifications along
Highway 51. MnDOT has indicated that municipal consent is not required for the proposed median
and access modifications.
Budget Impact
MnDOT has not requested local funding participation from the City of Arden Hills for the proposed
access modifications described above. The City’s Capital Improvement Program does not include
funding for potential access modifications along Highway 51.
Attachments
Attachment A: Presentation Slides
Attachment B: Summary of Questions and Comments
mndot.gov
Snelling & Hamline Safety Improvements
Project Information
Fay Simer| Metro North Area Coordinator
Arden Hills City Council Meeting, July 20, 2020
Area Context
MnDOT closed the left-turn from southbound Snelling Ave. to Hamline Ave. temporarily in 2019.
In 2022, MnDOT is planning a cable median barrier project between County Road C and I-694.
MnDOT may permanently close the Snelling Ave./Hamline Ave. intersection as part of that project.
Additional safety improvements are planned at nearby intersections where traffic may increase as a result of the closure of Snelling Ave./Hamline Ave. intersection.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 2
Snelling Avenue Context
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 3
Snelling & Hamline Intersection
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 4
History of Temporary Closure
MnDOT closed the Snelling Ave. and Hamline Ave. median temporarily in 2019.
•This was a recommendation in the I-35W MnPASS Local Transportation
Management Plan to keep traffic flowing safely and smoothly in
anticipation of increased traffic on Snelling Ave. due to the three-year
I-35W North MnPASS construction project.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 5
History of Temporary Closure
Anticipating that motorists unable to turn left on Hamline
Ave. would turn left at Lydia, MnDOT made improvements to
ease congestion at Lydia Ave.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 6
•Traffic signals now give more time to left
turns from southbound Snelling onto
eastbound Lydia and from eastbound Lydia
turning north on Snelling. If no northbound
vehicles are present, the signals are
coordinated to assign extra time to turning
movements at Lydia.
•MnDOT uses cameras to monitor traffic
backups and will continue to modify traffic
signal timing as needed to reduce delays.
Planning the Cable Median Barrier Project
In 2022, MnDOT is planning to install cable median barrier between County Road C and I-694.
•Existing cable median barrier installations show dramatic decreases in fatal and serious injuries caused by vehicles running off the road and crossing the median.
•Cable median barriers can reduce fatal crashes by 95%.
The project was identified independently of the I-35W North MnPASS project, as part of a statewide effort to reduce these dangerous types of crashes.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 7
Safety Analysis at Snelling Ave. & Hamline Ave.
Intersection Operations and Crashes
•Between 2016 and 2018, there were 5 crashes at this intersection involving vehicles in the southbound left turn lane or turning left across Snelling. One of these was a fatal crash (2017).
•By closing the left turn lane, traffic will reroute to intersections that are controlled by signals, providing drivers a safer option to turn left.
•As traffic increases over time, there are fewer opportunities for vehicles making a southbound left to find a gap in traffic to make their turn. This may cause people to take risks that lead to more serious crashes.
•Before the closure, vehicles queued beyond the end of the left turn lane and into the southbound through lane, risking dangerous, high-speed, rear-end crashes. Cars turning south from Old Snelling had little distance to weave across the road to the left turn lane-another crash risk.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 8
Mobility Analysis:
Before the Temporary Closure
•In 2018, only 8% of cars that
turned left from Snelling
Ave. to Hamline Ave. were
headed to adjacent
residences.
•Other destinations are well-
served by alternate routes.
2018 April-December Average Daily Weekday Traffic
92% Continued South
5% Turned North
3% Turned into
Autumn Grove
Travel Time Analysis: left turns at Hamline Ave.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 10
•Travel time spiked
after turn lane closure.
•Travel time trended
back down by
September.
•Turning left at Lydia
Ave. takes
approximately 5
minutes longer than
turning at Hamline
Ave.
Emergency Response
MnDOT interviewed emergency responders serving this area.
The closure does not reduce their ability to provide timely service
to neighborhoods adjacent to Snelling Ave. and Hamline Ave.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 11
Other planned safety improvements
Additional safety improvements are planned at nearby intersections
Lydia Ave.
•The southbound left-turn lane at Lydia will be extended 500 feet to accommodate more vehicles (planned in 2022).
Glenhill Rd.
•The median at Glenhill will be reconfigured to prevent illegal U-turns.
•Access from northbound Snelling to westbound Glenhill will remain open.
•Access from Glenhill to northbound Snelling will close. (temporary planning underwayin advance of permanent change planned in 2022)
County Road C and County Road C2
•Southbound left-turn lanes at these roads will be extended to accommodate more vehicles(planned in 2022).
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 12
Next Steps
•Implementation of cable median barrier project is
planned for 2022. Minor modifications may be
considered, such as breaks in the barrier to facilitate
walking and bicycling.
•An additional project is planned in 2025 to repave the
road. MnDOT is in the early phases of planning this
project and identifying other improvements that can be
completed with the repaving.
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 13
Comments
•MnDOT will accept comments through May 31.
•Request a paper copy of this presentation or send comments
to:
Fay Simer
North Area Coordinator
MnDOT Metro District
1500 W. County Road B-2
Roseville, MN 55113
651-234-7722 | fay.simer@state.mn.us
•More information on the Cable Barrier Median project:
mndot.gov/metro/projects/hwy51roseville-ardenhills
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 14
Thank you!
Project contact: Fay Simer
Fay.simer@state.mn.us
651.234.7722
mndot.gov/metro/projects/hwy51roseville-ardenhills
7/14/2020 mndot.gov 15
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 1
Summary of Questions and Comments Received
Snelling Ave. and Hamline Ave. Intersection Safety Improvement Project
May 19, 2020 Virtual Open House
The following is a summary of questions received during the virtual open house and answers provided during
the virtual open house. Responses to questions not answered at the open house and additional clarifications
have been added.
Questions are grouped according to the following categories:
• Snelling and Hamline Avenue Intersection
• Lydia Avenue
• Glenhill Road
• Cable median barriers
• Snelling Avenue
• Other
Snelling Avenue and Hamline Avenue Intersection
Question: Why is the southbound Snelling Avenue turn lane to Hamline Avenue closing?
Answer: The proposed closure is intended to balance safety and mobility. Safety is a primary concern. There has
already been a fatality. We feel that it probably makes a lot of sense to close this median to help with the safety
of the roadway and the safety of the roadway users.
Question: Why does MNDOT care where the vehicles go when they make a turn?
Answer: MnDOT works to balance the core values of safety and mobility as we make decisions to manage our
roads. In the case of Snelling and Hamline, most destinations accessed through that intersection are well-served
by alternate routes. Therefore, we perceive the mobility needs for this intersection to be less urgent than the
safety needs.
Question: Is the closing of this intersection already a done deal?
Answer: No, that's why we are here tonight to gather feedback. We want to hear about what you've
experienced and are concerned about. We are proposing to close it permanently during the cable median
barrier project. However, we are asking for feedback and are open to alternatives where it can be slightly
altered if we need to.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 2
Question: Can bikers and walkers cross Snelling Avenue at Hamline Avenue? Will any upgrades be made at
this location?
Answer: Bicyclists and pedestrians can legally cross at the Hamline Ave. intersection. We are proposing to close
that in 2022 with the cable median barrier project, but that's one of the things we wanted to hear feedback on
tonight. We don't believe that there are a lot of people crossing here, but we are asking for feedback because
we could consider leaving openings in the median barrier for bicyclists and pedestrians.
At this time, we have not proposed any pedestrian or bicyclist upgrades at the Hamline Ave. and Snelling Ave.
crossing.
Question: Have you considered extending the turn lane on southbound Snelling Avenue at Hamline Avenue?
Is there anything that could address the wait time?
Answer: An extended turn lane may address rear-end crashes going southbound on Snelling Ave, but it would
not address the higher-risk crashes that are more likely to lead to a fatal or serious injury. These are crashes
where drivers turning left choose too small of a gap to cross Snelling Ave. and are hit at a high speed, right-angle
by northbound vehicles.
Question: Can you time restrict the left turn lane from southbound Snelling Avenue to Hamline Avenue? What
about adding a ‘no left turn’ sign during afternoon rush hour? What about adding controlled arms like the
HOV lanes on I-394?
Answer: Signs are only effective if drivers obey them, or if high and continuous police enforcement occurs,
which typically doesn’t occur because of lack of staff. For example: There is a “no U-turn” sign at Glenhill Rd.,
but vehicles still are making this movement even with no southbound left turn lane. With low compliance of the
“no U-turn” sign it’s likely a “No Left Turn” sign at certain times of the day would also have a low
compliance. Also, at higher speeds with higher volumes on Snelling Ave., if a vehicle gets into or even slows to
get into the left turn lane and then sees they can’t turn, they have to merge back onto southbound Snelling Ave.,
where vehicles travel much faster than the speed limit, which presents a safety risk.
Controlled arm gates would present the same issue of vehicles having to merge back onto southbound Snelling
Ave. They also have on-going maintenance needs.
Question: How is a controlled intersection any safer than the intersection of Snelling Avenue and Hamline
Avenue? We still have an increase in traffic at Lydia Ave. and Co. Rd. C2, and Snelling Ave. intersections in
vehicles and pedestrians. If you close one with less accidents, then why not 2 intersections with more
documented accidents?
Answer: It is true that there are more crashes at Snelling and Lydia than at Snelling and Hamline. However, we
typically analyze safety through crash rates (number of crashes over the number of vehicles using an
intersection), not just raw numbers of crashes so that we compare the safety of different intersections. Snelling
and Lydia has a higher number of crashes, but lower crash rate index than Snelling Avenue and Hamline Avenue,
because it is used by more vehicles.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 3
Question: What about a light for the turn like on 280 and Broadway?
Answer: There is a signal at Lydia Ave. and Snelling Ave. with capacity to move additional traffic. Installing an
additional signal is an additional expense for equipment that needs to be maintained over the long term.
Question: How are you working with the local colleges and businesses who are also affected by this Hamline
Avenue/Snelling Avenue changes?
Answer: We do not anticipate large impacts on local colleges. Both the college and nearby businesses were
notified of this project and we haven't heard anything back.
We did investigate impacts to Hamline Avenue businesses and personally called each business owner. The
businesses are south of Lydia Ave., so the businesses have similar access to anybody else who would be making
these turns.
Question: Is the primary concern the mobility of people headed north on Snelling Avenue?
Answer: The primary reason for this closure is the safety of people making a southbound turn.
Question: How will motorists traveling northbound on Hamline Avenue be impacted?
Answer: MnDOT is proposing to close the southbound left turn lane at Hamline Avenue. Drivers may continue to
travel north on Hamline and turn right onto Snelling, just as they do today.
Lydia Avenue
Question: How many accidents were at the Snelling and (1) Co. Rd. C intersection and (2) Lydia Ave.
intersection? How many fatal crashes have been on Snelling Ave. in the time period 2008-2018? And where?
Answer: For the ten-year period from 2009-2018 there have been 244 crashes at the Snelling and CR C
intersection, and 40 crashes at the Snelling and Lydia Ave intersection. There were 30 crashes at the Snelling
and Hamline intersection. For that same time period there have been three fatal crashes from I-694 to Hwy 36.
One was at the exit from northbound Snelling to Co. Rd. E in 2017, another was at Hamline Ave./Lydia Ave. in
2017, and the last one was at Co. Rd. C in 2009.
Question: After the southbound turn lane from Snelling Avenue to Hamline Avenue closed, traffic on Lydia
Ave. seems to be elevated and turning left on Lydia Ave. can sometime take up to 3 lights to get through. How
do you weigh the tradeoffs of traffic flow? How do you hear from and consider concerns from residents living
on Lydia Ave.?
Answer: Lydia had average annual daily traffic of 1,900 vehicles in 2017. Lydia is designated in the City of
Roseville's Comprehensive Plan as a collector street, which the Metropolitan Council defines as a road that
carries between 1,000 - 15,000 vehicles per day. While it is certainly likely that the closure of Snelling and
Hamline did lead to increased traffic on Lydia, it did not result in a change in traffic levels that a collector street
is not anticipated to handle. Lydia Avenue residents were informed of the virtual open house.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 4
Question: Can the timing of the green arrow light going left on Lydia Ave. or Co. Rd. C2 be extended?
Answer: We have been giving the southbound left turn movement at Lydia Ave. and Co. Rd. C2 more time so
that they do not extend beyond their turn bay lengths. However, we do have to balance that with traffic on
northbound Snelling Ave. There are 35,000 vehicles a day and that is a lot of traffic to handle with a traffic signal.
Question: The lights at Lydia Ave. and at County RD C2 W have been much more dangerous for pedestrians
than the crossing of Hamline Ave. and Snelling Ave. How are you addressing those issues? How are you
tracking those issues?
Answer: The crossings at Lydia Ave. and at County RD C2 have a signal and although there is a lot of traffic,
people must come to a full stop. At Snelling Ave. and Hamline Ave. people are not stopping, so anybody crossing
Snelling Ave. at Hamline Ave. would be dealing with traffic that is going at a fairly high speed and not able to
stop.
MnDOT doesn’t have anything particular is planned for this time, but again we will be having a project that is
running up Snelling Avenue in 2025. As we plan for that project that’s definitely something we can look at and at
least take a look at what could be done.
Question: Traffic on Lydia Avenue seems to have increased. How are you addressing pedestrian and bicyclist
safety on Lydia Avenue? How have Lydia Avenue residents been made aware of the closure at Snelling
Avenue and Hamline Avenue?
Melissa Barnes, MnDOT: That would be beyond the scope of this project, but something we could talk about as
we move forward. What we're talking about today is really just closure of the median. The invitation to this open
house and all of the information that we've shared tonight to people along Lydia Ave. as well as people in this
area. Additionally, MnDOT is coordinating with the City of Roseville's efforts to improve signal timing at Lydia
that may help divert turning traffic to County Road C2 or C.
Marc Culver, City of Roseville: Some people have some concerns about traffic on Lydia Ave. and there's been a
lot of individual comments about pedestrian safety with the increased traffic. I think that's absolutely something
that the City of Roseville needs to look at with increased traffic. We have a pathway master plan that we
maintain and try to prioritize based on factors including traffic, access to transit, etc. We are looking at Lydia
Ave. as an area to improve pedestrian safety.
Glenhill Road
Question: How will the cable median barrier impacts residents who live in the Glenhill Road neighborhood?
Answer: For the Glenhill neighborhood west of Snelling Avenue, someone could still walk or bike through the
opening in the median. In order to travel north on Snelling Avenue, you would need to travel south on Hamline
Avenue and take a U-turn at Lydia Avenue.
Question: Will the turn lane from northbound Snelling Avenue to Glenhill Road be closing?
Answer: We are not looking at closing this turn lane. The neighborhood at Glennhill Road is much more
contained and there are no alternate routes to get there. In talking with emergency services, that is a much
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 5
more difficult neighborhood to get to and the alternate routes there are not as convenient. It would longer to
get there and there would be a lot more U-turns.
Question: What will be done to prevent U-turns on southbound Snelling Avenue to Glenhill Road?
Answer: The permanent change will be a median that creates a triangle to prevent people from making that
southbound U-turn. In the meantime, we are looking at putting up some flexible delineators to prohibit illegal U-
turns.
Cable Median Barrier Project
Question: How many miles of divided highway in MN are there with higher median incidents than Snelling
Ave. that don't have the barriers?
Answer: Besides crashes, MnDOT looks at risk factors including median width, ADT, and speed when comparing
segments. There are approximately 5 miles of highway in the Metro area that have a higher crash density than
Snelling. Like this segment those segments are being looked at proactively to be included with future projects.
Question: Is it legal to jump a cable median barrier? Will the cable median barrier effectively stop jay walkers
from crossing the grass median?
Answer: I am not aware of any laws addressing pedestrians and cable median barriers. Technically somebody
could jump it, but it would be a barrier and just like any fence it’s mountable, but it is something that would be
more difficult to cross.
Question: What about installing something more scenery friendly than a cable median? What about planting
trees?
Answer: There are not a lot of alternatives that are this effective. At the speed of Snelling Avenue in this area,
trees can become a hazard in themselves. When a car runs off the road, a tree becomes a hazard that people
can crash into as well. There have been four runoff road crashes since 2014 between Hwy 36 and I-694. Please
submit other ideas if you have suggestions.
Snelling Avenue
Question: How many vehicle crashes have there been where vehicles have crossed the median in this area?
What was the speed of the northbound traffic on Snelling in the most recent fatality?
Answer: Four in the last ten years. The police officer’s report did not list speed as a factor in the most recent
fatality.
Question: Is decreasing the speed on Snelling Avenue being considered? Isn't high speed a main cause of
accidents?
Answer: The speed limit is more a function of the design of the roadway. As we look to the future in 2025, we
can talk about what the roadway looks like. If we were to post the speed limit at a different speed limit,
motorists would likely still drive at about the same speed that it is today.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 6
Question: Is it okay to walk or bike across four lanes of Snelling Avenue?
Answer: Pedestrians legally have the right of way to cross the street at every unsignalized intersection in
Minnesota. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/169.21
Question: You mentioned Snelling Avenue work in 2025. What will that include?
Answer: Melissa Barnes, MnDOT: As of right now, it's being looked at as a pavement project. That’s all that it
includes right now.
Joe Lux, Ramsey County: We had some discussions here today that are kind of related to the discussion about
getting in and out of the Glen Hill neighborhood. There was some thought that at some point and possibly in
conjunction with the 2025 overlay or maybe as a local initiative, it might be an idea to add a trail on the west
side of Snelling Ave. There’s a pretty wide right-of-way and we thought that might be a possibility.
Marc Culver, City of Roseville: We have an opportunity to do some surveys and look at some possibilities but
looking at adding some sort of pedestrian facility in that area. Also looking at the west side of Hamline Avenue.
At least, to complete some gaps there between the Glen Hill neighborhood down to Lydia Avenue.
Question: How about the fatality on Snelling Avenue south of the Country Rd E exit?
Answer: In 2017, a pedestrian was hit near the base of the ramp from northbound Snelling Ave. to Co. Rd. E.
Other questions
Question: How does someone file a pedestrian issue outside of a police report of an accident?
Answer: Contact the police department. If it is not an emergency, contact MnDOT North Area Coordinator, Fay
Simer.
Question: Have you looked at pedestrian-data resources such as Strava (strava.com) to get data about the
traffic patterns of non-vehicles?
Answer: Yes, we have tried to use the same data that we use for vehicular information for pedestrians. We are
not finding it to be reliable, but we have looked, and we have tried to use some of it.
Question: Both the World Health Organization and NHTSA list excessive speed and distracted driving as the
highest risks for accidents. What will be done to correct this?
Answer: Speed and distracted driving are important, and it is something we can talk to our partners and
emergency services about. We are making a comprehensive effort to reduce distracted driving and lower speeds
to help increase safety.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 7
Question: How is the decision that "it may cost too much" made? It seems like proposals that may be
different from your proposed are answered as to costly or not practical. Where are you attempting to
measure the value to residents who live in the area?
Answer: We weigh decisions on cost, mobility, and safety regularly as part of decision-making on projects. Costs
are weighed both relative to each other for different alternatives, in this case closing the median or installing a
traffic signal, as well as consideration of long term maintenance costs. We also compare costs to our overall
program budget.
The following items were weighed to propose closing the median instead of other alternatives:
• The intersection has had a fatality and has other signs of risk that cause concern for future serious
crashes. Closing the intersection is the safest answer when comparing different intersection types.
• The alternate route if the median is closed is minimal and convenient for residents, businesses, and
emergency services.
• The cost of closing the median permanently is small and can be done in combination with an already
programmed project.
• Intersection types like signals or reduced conflict intersections (RCIs) are more costly both immediately
and for long-term maintenance than closing the median.
• There are relatively few people using the southbound left turn. Installing a signal here would cause delay
to the high number of people heading northbound for the few people taking a southbound left.
Additionally, because so few people are taking a southbound left, they are easily handled at the
surrounding signals and intersections.
Question: A question for Marc Culver, can we get the MSA [MN State Aid] designation removed from Hamline
Ave., north of Josephine Rd. with this closure so those tax dollars can be used for actual arterial roads and
have those homeowners along that route pay the cost of their road like a regular residential street?
Answer from Marc Culver: Hamline Ave is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) all the way to Snelling Ave.
Ramsey County would have to transfer jurisdiction to the City and then the City would have to make a decision
about whether to designate it as a Municipal State Aid Route or not. In that circumstance, given the amount of
traffic on the roadway, even with the median closure, Hamline Ave would still operate as a Major Collector and
it would likely be in the best financial interest of the City to designate it as a MSA Route. However, there has
been no indication from the County that they would transfer the jurisdiction of this roadway to the City.
Attendee comments received during on May 19 virtual open house
1. Traffic on Old Snelling was never supposed to be able to turn onto Hamline Ave. once the left hand turn
from northbound Snelling was eliminated at this area.
2. The increase in traffic on Hamline Ave would pose a danger to Lake Josephine walkers, that only can
walk on the shoulder.
3. I am one of those making the u turn or a right turn on Glenhill, u turn, then through the intersection. I
have no intention to stop making that turn unless they eliminate the hard turn arrows on Snelling,
especially at 3am.
4. We have not witnessed an increase in the left turn light at Lydia.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 8
5. I think we need to consider the fact that the amount of U-turns at Glenhill and Lydia seems far more
dangerous that having a safe turn lane at Hamline.
6. Your autumn grove numbers seem light if your visual representation is accurate
7. Since closing this, lots of back up's in the morning rush hour commute. especially on snow day's. This has
greatly increased since this closing. Also I have to turn left in which we have to go to Lydia or C2 which
lets about 3 people turn on these turn lanes. On a snow day 1-2 cars get to turn on the left turn lanes in
these intersections. These areas have also increased congestion because of the closure.
8. You have a number of children and students crossing at Lydia, far more than any other intersection in
the area.
9. Snelling is surrounded by houses between Lydia and County E, yet MnDOT is fine with traffic going
between 60-65 mph.
10. I do also think closure of the Left lane of Snelling to Hamline has cause much more issues than when it
was open.
11. And there it is: they're open to minor modifications. ie what was said last fall, that Arden Hills staff have
actually already signed off on this.
12. The length of the green light on northbound Snelling Lydia contributes to people making risky left turns
at Hamline as well as the speed on Snelling. 55 mph means 60-65 mph. I am one of the 3% turning into
autumn grove. In the eleven years I've lived here it appears the length of green on Snelling has increased
so cars are already going 60 by the time they reach the green at Lydia.
13. That data you just spoke about estimates a 70% increase of traffic on Lydia Ave to go to S bound
Hamline, which is a significant increase of vehicular traffic to the residential area on Lydia Ave, causing
increased risk to residence, bus stops for school age children, walkers, runners, bicycling and quality of
life for those living on Lydia and surrounding area.
14. You said the wire barriers saved 80 lives since 2004
15. This isn’t to actually consider public ideas for us who live here - they just want to placate all of us who
are upset. Very disappointing.
16. Lower speed also saves lives!
17. Definitely more traffic going South in the morning, please consider if your going to permanently close to
make lights a little longer than the 3 cars that could turn on a green arrow. Also, they have the North
bound land to go West on Lydia for the NWU and there is no cars but going left we are backed up 6 cars.
18. Traffic on Old Snelling was never suppose to be able to turn onto Hamline Ave. once the left hand turn
from northbound Snelling was eliminated at this area.
19. I live in the home incorrectly labeled as “New Horizon Academy” on the bottom right of the first slide.
Although there has only been 5 crashes and one the close calls are daily. Before it was closed I
constantly heard screeching tires and just waited for the sound of impact. I have two sons and have
always feared the day they start driving and need to navigate this intersection. Although I’m
significantly impacted by the increase in commute time multiple times daily, the safety risk far out
weighs the inconvenience. I’m in support of permanently closing this down.
20. We live on Glenhill Road directly off Hamline near the turn we are talking about (we can see where the
turn is). We have noticed a huge drop in traffic on our street. We have many kids on the block. It's
appalling how fast cars "bomb" down our street. This has reduced significantly since the closure.
21. I am all in favor of the permanent closing. Before, cars would race across Snelling, and then race south
on Hamline. This helps to slow the traffic on Hamline southbound.
22. I age as i wait for a turn signal onto Lydia. can you increase the number of light cycles to turn left instead
of just increasing the length of the cycle.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 9
23. Also, it is too dangerous for Mounds View and Roseville students to cross Snelling in this way. At dusk, it
is particularly dangerous.
24. They would drive slower if the highway patrol was doing more patrol work.
25. From 2008-2018 there were 3 fatality from Cty Rd C to Highway 694; Ctry Rd C; Hamline and south of
Cty Rd E access traveling north on Snelling.
26. I have used that crossing in the past (Hamline and Snelling) as a cyclist and would request that you keep
it open.
27. There are a lot of pedestrians on Lydia
28. Please put a gap in the cable median barrier there.
29. Still not answering question of left turn lanes on Lydia and C2
30. I don't appreciate that you slipped this in as part of the 35W issue as a way to just close it; quite sure
you were hoping nobody noticed.
31. Rush hour, not as many people traveling North in the morning.
32. 5 crashes in 2 years is not a large number.
33. The mandatory left turn arrows at C-2 and Lydia that run 24/7, without a yellow blinking arrow is a key
problem, but government has never removed these or changed them to the yellow blinking arrows ever
that I know of.
34. We live on Glenhill near Hamline Ave. We have appreciated the reduced traffic on Hamline in the
evening. Our neighborhood streets and Hamline Ave are much quieter as a result of this closure. We
support the permanent closure.
35. Why not put a left turn signal light at Hamline and Snelling that is activated when there are cars in the
turn lane. North bound traffic would not be stopped very long.
36. In Michigan, a road like this would have blinking yellow on Snelling and blinking red on C-2 and Lydia at
3am.
37. Another signal could also slow down traffic on Snelling.
38. I have waited on Lydia in the morning commute to turn southbound left for 8 minutes...way to long
39. Here is a link to Strava's data resource: https://metro.strava.com/
40. With this closure there is a lot more traffic thru Lydia ... How is neighborhood safety being addressed?
The speed and noise has tripled
41. Since we are all taxpayers and if this is so important, the democratic thing to is put it to a vote.
42. Left turn onto Lydia or c2 from southbound Snelling needs more cycles. I have wasted many gallons of
gas eating for that left turn light.
43. Plus, the light at Snelling and Lydia can take 5 plus minutes at rush hour to do a full round. If you have
to sit thru it more than once it’s frustrating to say the least
44. that directly affects many of the locals that live on those streets that are seeing way more traffic
45. your project directly effects Lydia safety. id say its not beyond the scope
46. In case people are interested. This is the real decision maker:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Anderson_Kelliher
47. If you are aware of all of these pedestrian concerns at Lydia, why are you adding more traffic to that
intersection!!
48. The pedestrian issue goes beyond the intersection.
49. Huge mistake, it has been nothing but congestion since
50. To me, it doesn't seem like MnDOT is really interested in what the residents say or suggest. This is a
project that they are pushing through.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 10
51. Thank you, Marc. The one think I'd like to point out to your remark about the UNW and Bethel
pedestrians... don't forget they're also the drivers. Their abilities don't improve with a few ton vehicle
that they drive in those crossings.
52. You haven't had complaints because we were told it was a temporary closure Lydia needs to be a part of
the scope of this project as it directly affects the closure of Hamline and Snelling. This affects more kids
at bus stops and families in this area making is unsafe. and at Lydia, there are a number of presentations
that are given throughout the year which add yet more traffic to the intersection.
53. Maybe no complaints because it was a temporary closure ....so we thought..
54. That is a good idea. If we are doing this - maybe we need to make sidewalks on Lydia and frankly
Hamline to help pedestrians with this.
55. Yep , it said opening back up in November
56. did everyone leave???
57. but there isn't a good alternate way as you are hearing from people
58. Tess, you can always call the City of Roseville Public Works Department at 651-792-7004 to file
complaints about pedestrian activity. We will make sure it gets to MnDOT, Ramsey County and/or Arden
Hills if need be.
o Response: You can also email engineering@cityofroseville.com
59. I'm specifically talking about LYDIA east of Snelling
60. Lydia people should be aware that the next action will be a double left turn and an expansion of Lydia.
Just wait. That will be coming next.
61. Some of this may have been eliminated if MnDOT had been apparent in the first place about closing this
roadway. We had to hunt for answers and are still dealing with the withholding of information.
62. Traffic pressure will result in this. In these projects, there are always winners and losers. Hamline Ave
north of Josephine Road is a winner, and Lydia Avenue is a loser.
63. The question is about how they get out of their neighborhood after the barrier is put in
64. When you talk about balancing mobility needs with safety is that the mobility of people heading north
on Snelling
65. There are no alternate routes. Snelling is the only road for them.
66. It's legal. And it’s the only way for someone on foot or bike to leave the Glenhill neighborhood.
67. Can you say once again where one can go to get a copy of the transcript of this presentation and the
questions and answers. Thanks.
o Response: mndot.gov/metro/projects/hwy51roseville-ardenhills
68. Commuter traffic through neighborhoods decreases safety for the families that live there
69. I would hope that MnDOT would look at the suggestions from this presentation including signals at
Hamline and Snelling.
70. The length of the green light on northbound Snelling Lydia contributes to people making risky left turns
at Hamline as well as the speed on Snelling. 55 mph means 60-65 mph. I am one of the 3% turning into
autumn grove. In the eleven years I've lived here it appears the length of green on Snelling has increased
so cars are already going 60 by the time they reach the green at Lydia.
E-mailed Comments Received Before June 7
1. I would like to voice my support for the proposed permanent closure of the left-turn lane from
southbound Snelling Avenue to Hamline Avenue.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 11
Although we live almost directly across from the closed turn lane and did use it regularly in the past, I
always felt it was a risky turn. I have heard the crashes and seen accidents at that location from time to
time. I am happy to make the turn on Lydia now to improve safety and traffic flow. Thank you for the
opportunity to comment.
2. I live on Ingerson Road between Snelling and Lexington. I am in favor of leaving the turnoff
closed. While it was nice to be able to come south from 694 and turn onto Hamline there, it isn't a
problem to go to Lexington or turn east on County Road E instead. I think a number of people used to
use that path as some kind of shortcut, because I would see cars roaring up the hill all the way to
Lexington - meaning they do not live on this section of street. They frequently drove too fast. There is
less traffic now and that is a significant safety advantage. Our neighborhood homes have recently
started turning over, and we have about 20 toddlers on our street now, as well as school-age
children. We have a ton of walkers and no sidewalks. As well as people who live on this street walking
and biking with strollers or young children, there are lots of people who walk around Lake Josephine for
exercise. Sometimes I also see the boys track team running up and down the hill.
In short, our street has a very high number of pedestrians, and we want to keep it as safe as
possible. Only people living in this neighborhood should be driving through here, and they should be
driving slowly and carefully. I am perfectly willing to deal with the minor inconvenience of exiting at a
different spot in order to protect all the little children and others walking down our street and around
the lake.
3. We are in the neighborhood between the Lydia and Hamline left turns from Snelling and were not able
to attend last nights zoom meeting. I just wanted to let you know that we definitely miss being able to
turn directly into our neighborhood. We used that almost everyday.
I have to say, though, what I find more disappointing was the loss of access to eastbound 694 from
Snelling. The exit onto Snelling from westbound 694 traffic was also taken away. This has intensified an
already challenging traffic situation at Lexington. Please restore those access point on Snelling!!!!
4. I am reaching out in support of this permanent median closure. Traffic feels much safer with this closed.
I take this route home daily (well, at least before COVID19), and I can't tell you how many close calls I've
seen, of cars turning left from Snelling to Hamline. There are many times I've been cut off by someone
taking a turn here. This entire intersection is unsafe due to how fast traffic is going on Snelling.
5. I'm writing to express my support for the permanent closure of the left hand turn as part of the
Snelling/Hamline safety improvements. I think reopening the turn is both unsafe and unnecessary for
our neighborhood.
The primary reason that residents from my area would want the crossing re-opened is to cut over from
Snelling across to Hamline. This requires crossing MN-51 with traffic posted at 55 MPH and most cars
actually going faster. MN-51 curves north of the intersection so visibility of on-coming cars is only about
0.2 miles That gives drivers waiting at a dead stop only 16 seconds (hope my math's right) to cross two
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 12
lanes of 55 MPH traffic. During rush hour in normal times there is very little gap between on-coming
cars making it even riskier to cross.
This crossing also encourages drivers from outside our neighborhood to use Old Snelling as a short-cut
to avoid rush hour delays on 35W or 36, as well as to get around back-ups on Cty E onty MN-51.
The access to Hamline is also unnecessary. Our neighborhood has an entrance onto MN-51 only 3-4
blocks away. We can get to Hamline off of MN-51 at Lydia and I clocked my wait last week at about 2
minutes.
I support the plan to make the left hand closure permanent.
6. As a resident on Ingerson Road and a father of 3 young children, I can say without a doubt a permanent
closure of this turn lane would be the only prudent decision. There are numerous alternatives for getting
around this area and add a mere few minutes. Including both Lydia and County E, etc. Before this turn
lane was temporarily closed, the lack of enforcement on speeders flying down our road as a “cut
through route” makes closing it permanently the best course of action.
The decrease in both total traffic but decrease in dangerous speeds traffic has been undeniably
substantial. I would guess somewhere in the neighborhood of a 60% decrease.
A neighbor was recently hit in the street while on his mower, but thankfully was ok. I worry about the
first one that happens to one of the 35~ children under the age of 6 that live in this 3-5 block radius
now. It was only about 6 children when we moved in about 7 years ago. Been very fun to see the
changes!
On behalf of my neighborhood’s safety and the majority of my neighbors’ shared opinion on that as well
- please keep this turn lane closed permanently.
7. We are writing to you to address our concerns of the State’s proposed permanent closure of the S/B
Snelling Avenue (Hwy 51) S/B left turn to Hamline Avenue. The City of Roseville has in recent years
worked hard with the parks, sidewalks and improved roads for quality of life here in Roseville, but this
closure will worsen not improve quality of life for those of us living on and around the Lydia Avenue
neighborhood between Snelling and Hamline Avenue.
We have not contacted you previously because we were told the closure was temporary. After being
notified by mail from MN DOT and observing the online meeting we now have cause to contact you
directly. We have owned the house since 1999 and have seen many changes over the years which have
seen an increase in traffic to our road, mainly due to the growth of Northwestern University. However,
nothing has impacted our quality of life more as when the temporary closure was implemented due to I-
35W improvement project.
Our front door is just 39 feet from the curb and we observe the traffic and noise on a 24/7 prospective.
Our children both have bus stop locations for pick up and drop off on Lydia Avenue. Since the closure
was implemented the amount of traffic has increased significantly. The most disturbing portion of the
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 13
increased traffic has been the before dawn, throughout the day and now evening increase in
commercial motor vehicle’s which would normally have used Hamline and Snelling Avenue’s as opposed
to Lydia Avenue. Being so close we not only hear the vehicle’s more, but some literally shake the house.
Secondly, this increase in traffic has brought us drivers who don’t normally travel this residential
neighborhood route to their daily destination and they bring an increase in frustration, speed and
inattentive driving habits. We have witnessed high speeds of drivers the entire way on Lydia just to turn
right on Hamline Avenue, passing of other vehicle’s at a high speed and in a no passing zone, drivers
yelling and honking at pedestrians walking on the shoulder and I have personally reported numerous
bus stop arm violations to the Roseville Police Department and to the Moundsview School district. The
State mentioned in the virtual meeting this is a public safety issue for the drivers who use Sneliing and
Hamline, but has created a greater risk to public health, pedestrian and drivers alike for an entire
residential neighbood for the families who live on or near Lydia Avenue between Snelling and Hamline
Avenues.
Third, it makes no sense to base this decision on the amount and severity of accidents at the
intersection of Snelling and Hamline, when more documented property damage, personal injury and
accidents resulting in death have occurred at Snelling and Lydia over the past 20+ years then Snelling
and Hemline.
We and our neighbors ask you to be our voice to the State of MN DOT in opposing the permanent
closure of the Snelling S/B exit to S/B Hamline Avenue for our continued quality of life, safety and well
being not having to be worried if an accident happens on Lydia Avenue, but when and at what cost.
8. I am a resident of the Ingerson neighborhood and love the area! I did watch some of the meeting Held a
few weeks ago and appreciate you guys making it available for people who were not available to watch
it live. The slide show did provide answers to some questions and I do understand the reasoning behind
considering closing the intersection if your studies have shown the majority of motorists continue south
on Hamline and are essentially using the left turn as a means for avoiding traffic on Snelling.
However, on behalf of those of us who are legitimately using the turn lane as the fastest route home, I
am wondering if any part of your research studied the use of the lane and traffic patterns during non-
rush hours. Would it be a viable option to prohibit turning left at the intersection during peak hours
while allowing residents of the neighborhoods to utilize the route for our weekend and evening drives?
The rush hours, I assume, are the times when the turn is most risky, so closing the lane at rush would
improve safety while keeping some access for neighborhoods.
I know signage is not always an effective deterrent, however, signs are used to communicate no u turns
at other intersections along Snelling, as well as to communicate no left from westbound Hamline to
southbound Snelling at that very intersection.
9. We understand that our comments about the Hamline/Snelling Intersection (“Intersection”) are to be
submitted to you. We have lived in the area since 1991 and used the left turn lane from Snelling to
Hamline on numerous occasions so we are very familiar with the area and Intersection.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 14
We are opposed to the permanent closure of this Intersection for the numerous reasons cited below.
It’s difficult to discuss/debate an issue when one doesn’t have all of the pertinent documentation that
went into MnDOT’s decision to close the Intersection. We still have unanswered questions from MnDOT
Data Practice department. During the May 19, 2020, Joy Miciano, MNDOT Consultant said that MnDOT
would post the transcript of the May 19, 2020 meeting, including the answers to the questions that
were not answered during the meeting by May 26, 2020. That date has come and gone and MnDOT has
not posted the transcript.
We reserve the right to submit additional comments if the May 19, 2020 transcript is ever posted.
As MnDOT knows, additional traffic is being diverted to Snelling Avenue because of the Highway I-35
three-year construction project. So right now there is not a true picture of the area.
Even MnDOTs PowerPoint presentation Snellingt_Hamline_3_noVolume shows why the intersection
should remain open. A number of Minnesota taxpayers made the left hand turn on numerous days if
not daily. And continue to make that turn even if that requires an illegal U-turn at the Glenhill
intersection. It should not matter to MnDOT where vehicles go after turning left. What should matter is
how many vehicles access the left hand turn and should the Intersection be left open.
MnDOT claims, without any substantiating evidence, that there were backups at the Intersection. We
have not seen a backup of traffic attempting to make a left hand turn at the Intersection. If MnDOT
claims there are backups then they should provide evidence of such backups. If the length of the turn
lane is an issue, make the turn lane longer.
MnDOT continues to refer to the December 2017 fatality at the Intersection as the basis for its decision
to close the Intersection. This is hard for us to understand because if one (1) fatality is MnDOT’s major
basis for extreme modification, then MnDOT would have numerous projects throughout the year at
various locations. The labor and cost would be exorbitant; MnDOT would run out of money.
According to 2017 MN Department of Public Safety report, the number of seniors involved in traffic
crashes increased since 2011. December 2017 was “more senior-driver involved crashes than any other
month.” Failure “to yield right of way was listed most often.” (Minnesota Motor Vehicle Crash Facts,
2017. MnDPS)
MnDOT purports that “safety” is the reason for the closure. From 2008-2018 there were 3 fatalities on
Snelling between County Road C and County Road E: County Road C; Hamline; and on Snelling just
south of the County Rd E access. Although no one wants to see any type of accidents, compared to
other locations, three (3) fatalities in 10 years is an extremely low statistic. From 2016-2018 there were
135 accidents on Snelling Avenue from County Road C to Highway 694. There were 58 accidents at the
County Road C intersection; 12 at the Lydia intersection and 12 at the Hamline intersection. We do not
see anything being done at the County Road C or Lydia intersections because of the accident count at
those locations.
May 19 Virtual Open House: Questions and Comments Received 15
Although there was a fatal accident, that alone does not justify the closure of the Intersection. If for
every fatal accident, the applicable intersection was permanently changed/closed, there would be a lot
more MnDOT closures. What do you do about fatal accidents that don’t occur at intersections? Do you
close down the road?
Accidents unfortunately occur all of the time. But changes don’t necessarily mean that accidents won’t
occur. Accidents occur even at controlled intersection and on roadways not in the vicinity of an
intersection.
By closing the Intersection, MnDOT is routing traffic to Lydia Avenue, a much more residential area than
Hamline Avenue. Also, MnDOT is placing more lives at risk by requiring traffic to use Lydia. Because of
Northwestern and Bethel College, the Lydia intersection is used constantly by students. Many of the
students fail to obey the traffic lights and cross Snelling that has a green light. They use both the south
and north side of the intersection to cross. By requiring additional traffic to turn left at Lydia, or make a
U-turn at the intersection, the well-being of countless students is being sacrificed.
Who has the right-of-way in the following situation: vehicle traveling southbound on Snelling waiting to
make a MnDOT recommended U-turn at Lydia. Vehicle on the east side of the Lydia intersection wants
to make a right turn. Once the light turns green, vehicle starts to make a U-turn at the same time the
other vehicles is taking a right on to northbound Snelling. Who has the right away? This is an accident
waiting to occur.
If MnDOT is closing down this Intersection, it should also close down the left hand turn lane on Snelling
northbound that goes onto Glenhill. Like the Hamline intersection the Glenhill traffic would cross two
(2) lanes of Snelling Ave. traffic. The Glenhill vehicles can do the same thing MnDOT is asking the
Hamline/Snelling vehicles to do; take an alternate route. They can access County Road E and return to
Snelling to access the Glenhill turn. This round-about way of accessing Glenhill is no different than what
MnDOT is asking of the southbound Snelling taxpayers that have been turning left at Hamline since at
least 1991 when we moved to the area. Glenhill is no different than Hamline in this respect.
MnDOT indicated that they might consider leaving enough room between the cable connections to
allow for the passage of bicycles and walking pedestrians. Does MnDOT consider this safer than
allowing vehicles to turn left at Snelling!! We beg to differ.
As a compromise, we suggest that MnDOT install a weighed left-turn light at the Snelling/Hamline
Intersection. The signal only turns green when there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
Once you have read and reviewed all of the comments, what happens next? How do we know when
and what final decision MnDOT has made? Thank you for your attention to this matter.
AGENDA ITEM – 1C
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 20, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2021 – 2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A Various
Council Should Consider
Provide feedback to staff on Preliminary 2021 – 2025 CIP Plan.
Discussion
This is a continuation of the discussion from the June 15, 2020 work session. The agenda report
from the June work session is attached (Attachment A). Updates to the plan and additional
information based on the discussion from that night are as follows:
• The value of city streets at the top of page 2 of the 06/15/20 memo was incorrect. The $112.4
was based on 57 miles of streets and the city portion of this is 29.42 miles. That paragraph
should have read:
The city has about $60 million of streets and trails. Estimating the useful life of these assets at
40 years would require an investment of about $1.5 million annually. The current funding
sources of the tax levy, Municipal State Aid and special assessments account for about $1.1
million on average per year. This gap in the CIP fluctuates from year-to-year, but will need to
be addressed over time.
• There was much discussion regarding the separation of the Snelling Avenue road project
(County Road E to Highway 51) and the round-a-bout. Staff has contacted Ramsey County
about this and while they have not given a definitive answer, they did not object to the two
projects being constructed under separate contracts. Also, the City will have cash flow issues
if it were to complete the round-a-bout in 2022. The estimate is that $470,000 of state aid will
be needed for funding and the city will not be eligible for reimbursement until 2025 or later
because of the advance taken in 2020.
• There were some questions about 2020 capital activity. I have added 2020 information to the
cash flow statements for the PIR, Equipment/Building Replacement and Public Safety Funds.
Also, Attachment B shows more detail for the Equipment/Building Replacement Fund. The
adopted 2020 budget is listed as well as the proposed changes from the March 9th council
meeting and the proposed 2021-2025 CIP.
• Replacement of the City Hall roof was added to 2025 at a cost of $150,000.
As discussed at the June work session, there are 3 types of street improvement projects staff is
looking at.
• Resurfacing is the milling of the top 1.5 to 2 inch surface layer of street pavement and
overlaying the street with a new bituminous surface layer.
• Full Depth Reclamation involves spot repair of existing curb, milling or reclaiming the full
depth of existing bituminous pavement, blending milled material with underlying aggregate
material and installing a new bituminous pavement section.
• Reconstruction involves removal and replacement of larger quantities of existing curb,
installing underlying subgrade correction materials, new aggregate base and a new
bituminous pavement section.
A preliminary plan has been prepared and is attached which includes a summary of projects,
detailed project sheets, sources of funds, and estimated fund balances (since the operating budgets
have not yet been completed, these fund balances are estimated operating costs). Cash flow
information is included on street and park projects going out ten (10) years even though our CIP is
only for five years. Please note that project timelines are subject to change and that the current
timeline is City Staff’s best estimate. The CIP does not commit the council to the proposed projects,
nor implement the assumptions made during the preparation; however, this is the basis for the 2021
Budget as we continue with its preparation.
The 2020-2024 CIP was a $15.3 Million plan, while the proposed 2021-2025 CIP is listed for $15.7
Million in expenditures. This is a 3.1% increase from the previous year’s program or $473,068.
The biggest change is found in street projects.
Council Direction
Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the following items:
2021 projects (Attachment C)
As we review the 2021 projects, does the Council have any questions, comments or concerns
about including them during budget preparation?
2021 property tax levy
The levies for the EDA ($100,000), Equipment/Building Replacement ($50,000) and PIR
($250,000) are currently proposed to remain at the same amount as was levied in 2020 in this plan.
The plan reflects a $50,000 increase in the levy for the Public Safety Capital Fund, going from
$70,000 to $120,000. It is assumed that levy increases will be needed each year from 2021-2025
to ensure the City has sufficient cash on hand to make its debt service payments once the new fire
station is built. Should staff continue forward with this assumption?
2020 General Fund balance
It is proposed to utilize a transfer from the General Fund in 2020 to cover the city’s cost of the
land for the new fire station ($417,000). This figure may be reduced by about $75,000 with a
potential contribution from the fire department’s General Fund.
The remaining balance of $61,000 to $136,000 could be transferred to either the
Equipment/Building Replacement Fund or the PIR Fund. Does the Council have a preference on
where the funds should go?
Budget Impact
The Council should review the estimated fund balances and funding sources with special attention
given to the Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund, Equipment Building Replacement
Fund, and the Public Safety Capital Fund.
Attachments
Attachment A: Agenda Report from June 15, 2020 work session
Attachment B: Equipment/Building Replacement Fund – changes to 2020 and proposed plan
Attachment C: Listing of 2021 projects included in the 2021-2025 CIP
Attachment D: Capital Improvement Plan
AGENDA ITEM – 1C
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 15, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2021 – 2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A Various
Council Should Consider
Provide feedback to staff on Preliminary 2021 – 2025 CIP Plan.
Background
Annually, the City prepares a five (5) year Capital Improvement Plan for budgeting and forecasting.
The focus of the CIP is on the maintenance and protection of the City’s existing assets,
redevelopment, and investment in new initiatives. The CIP is part of the budget process, but it is
not a budget, it is a plan, and one that changes often. The CIP does not commit the council to the
proposed projects, nor implement the assumptions made during the preparation; however, this is
the basis for the 2021 Budget as we continue with its preparation.
The city has a finite amount of resources, so prioritizing and then being able to finance projects is
crucial for ensuring the city’s long-term sustainability and being responsible stewards of the city’s
investments. Staff has been working on completing a comprehensive study of the City’s current
and future needs for infrastructure projects to better estimate project costs and ensure more accurate
forecasting of available fund balances.
Discussion
A preliminary plan has been prepared and is attached which includes a summary of projects, sources
of funds, and estimated fund balances (since the operating budgets have not yet been completed,
these fund balances are estimated operating costs). Project detail information is not included at this
time as we are focusing on cash flow rather than detailed descriptions. Information is included on
street and park projects going out ten (10) years even though our CIP is only for five years. Please
note that project timelines are subject to change and that the current timeline is City Staff’s best
estimate.
The 2020-2024 CIP was a $15.3 Million plan, while the proposed 2021-2025 CIP is listed for $15.7
Million in expenditures. This is a 3.1% increase from the previous year’s program or $475,838.
The biggest change is found in street projects.
PIR Fund
• The city has about $112.4 million of streets and trails. Estimating the useful life of these
assets at 40 years would require an investment of about $2.8 million annually. The current
funding sources of the tax levy, Municipal State Aid and special assessments account for
about $1.1 million on average per year. This gap in the CIP fluctuates from year-to-year, but
will need to be addressed over time. The fund balance was just over $6 million at the end of
2017 and is projected to drop to $770,000 by the end of 2025.
• A property tax levy of $250,000 is being proposed for 2021, which is unchanged from 2020.
• The city has been able to self-finance the special assessment portion thus far. However, with
the cost of these projects increasing, we may need to eventually look at bonding for the
special assessment portion of street projects. Current projections do not include any
prepayments of special assessments.
• There is a definite need to stay on top of street improvement projects to ensure streets reach
their useful lives and don’t require costly premature full reconstructions. Several areas of the
city are reaching those crucial ages that significant outlay is needed to ensure the long-term
vitality of the streets.
• The Snelling Ave. road project (County Road E to Highway 51) is scheduled to proceed in
2022 but the round-a-bout was separated out as its own project and isn’t scheduled until 2026.
• The two trail projects (Mounds View High School and Snelling Avenue N) for which state
funding is being requested, are not currently included in the CIP. Information has been added
to the bottom of the Sources and Uses for the PIR Fund to show the potential impact of these
projects if they are approved for state funding.
Public Safety Capital Equipment Fund
• The fund is currently being used to account for capital expenditures made by the Lake
Johanna Fire Department.
• It is proposed to utilize a transfer from the General Fund in 2020 to cover the city’s cost of the
land for the new fire station.
• The assumption being used for this CIP is that debt service on the new fire station will begin
in 2025 at $195,000 per year and continuing for 15 years. This could be decreased to
$155,000 if we were to bond for 20 years. Property tax levy increases are proposed for the
years 2021-2025 with a final total levy increase of $225,000.
• Major vehicle purchases are projected to occur in 2026, 2027 and 2028. LJFD will need to
reevaluate their need and look at spreading these costs out over a longer period of time to
level off the funds needed from contract cities.
Equipment & Building Replacement Fund
• The current plan includes $350,000 for HVAC equipment in 2020 and $300,000 for the city
hall parking lot in 2021.
• The long-term asset management plan for equipment has not yet been completed so purchases
are only scheduled out for 5 years.
Utility Funds
• The City conducted a rate study in 2017-2018 to address utility rates and financing further
Enterprise Fund operations. The assumptions used for these cash projections includes the rate
increases proposed in the study. The adopted rate increases may differ from the study
because they are based on an analysis of actual operations and updated estimates. For
example, the 2020 rate increase for water and sewer was 3% even though the rate study
recommended 6.5%.
• Public Works staff continues to evaluate the condition of City utilities throughout the
community. The majority of street projects currently include a minimum amount for isolated
utility repairs. Staff will complete a comprehensive review of the utility systems to identify
locations where broader water, sanitary sewer and drainage replacement is needed. This will
increase the forecasted capital expenses for the utility funds.
Budget Impact
The Council should review the estimated fund balances and funding sources with special attention
given to the Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund, Equipment Building Replacement
Fund, and the Public Safety Capital Fund.
Attachments
Attachment A: Overview of Capital Improvement Plan
Equipment/Building Replacement Fund
Adopted Current
Budget Budget YTD
2020 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Replace 2010 Bobcat Toolcat #435 40,000 35,100 35,095
Replace 2012 F350 Truck #203 48,000 47,360
Replace 2010 F350 Truck #210 46,000 41,570
Replace Int'l Plow Truck #120 108,970 135,000
Replace 1997 Toro #409 60,000
Trade In Program Toro #458 & #459 30,000
Portable Message Board 16,000
Add Portable Light Tower 10,000
Replace 2005 Trailer #414 10,000
Replace 2001 Workman #411 25,000
Building Insp Vehicle #504 36,000
Replace F450 Truck #211 80,000
Replace 1996 Roller #106 10,000
Replace Sterling Acterra #431 160,000
Replace 2012 Int'l Plow #115 100,000 150,000
Repalce 2018 Toro #457 80,000
City Hall Repair/Maint placeholder 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
City Hall HVAC 350,000 350,000
City Hall Parking Lot 175,000 40,000 33,419 260,000
City Hall Roof 150,000
659,000 623,000 68,514 561,000 121,000 130,000 320,000 430,000
Proposed
Projects in 2021Project Fund Source AmountCity Hall Maintenance Equip/Bldg Replacement $50,000Ongoing maintenance & repair placeholder.City Hall MaintenanceEquip/Bldg Replacement$300,000Completion of City Hall parking lot. $40,000 is accounted for in 2020.PlaygroundsCapital Improvement$110,000Reconstruct Arden Manor play area.Hazelnut Park Warming House Capital Improvement$90,000Replace warming house.LJFD Capital ItemsPublic Safety Capital$19,660City share of Lake Johanna Fire Department capital budget.2021 PMPCap Impr/Utilities$3,807,000Hazelnut neighborhood street & utility improvements.1
Lexington AvenueCap Impr/Water$1,033,000City share of design work on Ramsey County project.Sewer LiningSewer$175,000Arden View Drive neighborhood.Lift Station RehabSewer $48,000Rehabilitation needed on station 3.Trunk Water Main Evaluation Water$65,000Evaluate condition between north and south towers.Karth Lake Runoff Control Surface Water Mgmt/Grant$180,000Drainage improvements, south end of lake. 50% is covered by grant funding.Projects in 2021Project Fund Source Amount2
Replace Int’l Plow Truck (#120) Equip/Bldg Replacement $135,000Replace 1997 Toro Groundmaster (#409) Equip/Bldg Replacement $60,000Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers (#458/ #459)Equip/Bldg Replacement $30,000Add Portable Message Board Equip/Bldg Replacement $16,000Add Portable Light Tower Equip/Bldg Replacement $10,000Equipment in 2021Project Fund Source Amount3
2021-2025
Proposed
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PLAN
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Council Work Session July 20, 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
Department Summary 1
Capital Improvement Plan by Department 2
Capital Improvement Project Detail Sheets 5
Equipment Replacement Program by Department 33
Equipment Project Detail Sheets 34
Projects by Funding Source 47
Sources and Uses of Funds 51
Map of Street Projects 58
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
2021 2025thru
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Department
Economic Development 286,130246,130 40,000
Equipment 902,000251,000 71,000 80,000 270,000 230,000
Government Buildings 660,000310,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000
Parks Department 887,000200,000 426,000 55,000 206,000
Public Safety 585,53019,660 238,120 25,000 82,750 220,000
Sanitary Sewer Department 1,073,000223,000 90,000 430,000 330,000
Street Department 10,569,5004,645,000 1,787,000 1,872,500 1,357,500 907,500
Surface Water Management Dept 470,000180,000 290,000
Water Department 290,00065,000 75,000 60,000 90,000
5,893,660 2,983,250 2,802,500 1,860,250 2,183,500 15,723,160TOTAL
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software 1
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
2021 2025thru
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Department Project # Priority
Economic Development
22-EDA-001 286,130246,130 40,000Gateway Signs n/a
286,130246,130 40,000Economic Development Total
Government Buildings
21-Bldg-005 250,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000City Hall Maintenance 2
21-Bldg-006 260,000260,000City Hall parking lot 3
25-Bldg-002 150,000150,000City Hall roof 3
660,000310,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000Government Buildings Total
Parks Department
20-Park-003 236,000110,000 126,000Playground Structure Replacement 3
21-Park-002 90,00090,000Hazelnut Park Warming House 4
22-Park-001 506,000426,000 80,000Hard Court Reconstruction 3
23-Park-004 55,00055,000Perry & Cummings Park Roof Maintenance 3
887,000200,000 426,000 55,000 206,000Parks Department Total
Public Safety
21-Pub-001 76,69017,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000LJFD General Equipment n/a
21-Pub-002 79,5301,280 20,500 57,750LJFD Rescue/Chief/Utility Vehicle Replacement n/a
21-Pub-004 46,8101,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000LJFD Station Capital n/a
22-Pub-001 187,500187,500LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement n/a
25-Pub-005 195,000195,000Lake Johanna Fire Dept Fire Station n/a
585,53019,660 238,120 25,000 82,750 220,000Public Safety Total
Sanitary Sewer Department
21-Sew-001 348,00048,000 90,000 210,000Lift Station Rehabilitation 2
21-Sew-002 725,000175,000 220,000 330,000Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 2
1,073,000223,000 90,000 430,000 330,000Sanitary Sewer Department Total
Street Department
21-Str-005 3,632,0003,632,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
21-Str-006 1,013,0001,013,000Lexington Improvements 2
22-Str-001 822,000822,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 965,000965,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
23-Str-001 1,872,5001,872,500Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 1,357,5001,357,500Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets and Stowe Ave 2
25-Str-001 907,500907,500Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
10,569,5004,645,000 1,787,000 1,872,500 1,357,500 907,500Street Department Total
Surface Water Management Dept
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software 2
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Department Project # Priority
21-Storm-001 180,000180,000Karth Lake Runoff Control 2
23-Storm-001 65,00065,000Karth Lake retaining wall 2
23-Storm-002 225,000225,000Storm Pond and Outfall Maintenance 2
470,000180,000 290,000Surface Water Management Dept Total
Water Department
21-W-002 65,00065,000Trunk Water Main Evaluation 2
22-W-001 135,00075,000 60,000Water Tower Maintenance 2
25-W-002 90,00090,000Booster Station Improvements 2
290,00065,000 75,000 60,000 90,000Water Department Total
GRAND TOTAL 14,821,1605,642,660 2,912,250 2,722,500 1,590,250 1,953,500
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software 3
4
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Community Devl Dir
2021 2025
thru Department Economic Development
Description
Install gateway signs at major entry points to the City. Potential locations for signs include: (1) Highway 96 at Round Lake Road, (2) Highway 96
at Lexington Avenue, (3) County Road E at Highway 51, (4) County Road E at Lexington Avenue, (5) Lexington Avenue at County Road F, and
(6) Lexington Avenue at County Road D. Potential sign locations are not listed in order of priority and are subject to change.
There are three existing gateway signs in the following locations: (1) County Road E2 at I-35W, (2) County Road D at Cleveland Avenue, and (3)
Lake Johanna Boulevard at the Roseville border.
The cost for a typical sign is $25,000, including installation, lighting and landscaping. Actual costs will vary depending on the amount of site
improvements and/or landscaping that is necessary in a specific location.
The City has discussed completing the gateway sign at Highway 96 and Lexington Avenue as being a priority. Based on preliminary cost estimates
completed for the sign in 2018, staff has budgeted $246,130 for completing this gateway sign in 2022. This amount includes final design,
construction and inspection costs as well as a contingency.
Staff has budgeted $40,000 for the completion of an additional gateway sign in 2024 at a location to be determined.
Project #22-EDA-001
Priority n/a
Justification
Advance the economic development goals in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Implement the Guiding Plan for the B2 District. Work to better
identify the entrance points to the City for businesses and visitors. Foster civic pride and community identity.
As discussed with the Council, the plan is to highlight existing signs and look at recommendations in 2020.
Budget Impact/Other
Annual maintenance costs for sign cleaning and care of landscaping is estimated by the Public Works Department at $500 per sign annually.
Useful LifeProject Name Gateway Signs Category Economic Devl Improvement
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$286,130
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
286,130246,130 40,000Construction/Maintenance
246,130 40,000 286,130Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
286,130246,130 40,000EDA General Fund
246,130 40,000 286,130Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
5
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Finance Director
2021 2025
thru Department Government Buildings
Description
City Hall will require ongoing maintenance and replacement of items to maintain operational duties (carpet, painting, HVAC, etc.).
Project #21-Bldg-005
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Items will be due for replacement, and will save the City future repair costs by replacing them in the near-term.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 10
Project Name City Hall Maintenance Category Building Repair & Maint
Type Maintenance
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$250,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
250,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
250,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
6
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Building Official
2021 2025
thru Department Government Buildings
Description
Reconstruct City Hall parking lot including sidewalk repairs. Replace five parking lot lights.
Project #21-Bldg-006
Priority 3 Important
Justification
The parking lot is in need of repairs including subgrade corrections and replacement of damaged curbing.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20
Project Name City Hall parking lot Category Building Repair & Maint
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$300,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
260,000260,000Construction/Maintenance
260,000 260,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
260,000260,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
260,000 260,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
7
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Building Official
2021 2025
thru Department Government Buildings
Description
Replace 9000 sq ft roof at City Hall.
Project #25-Bldg-002
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name City Hall roof Category Building Repair & Maint
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$150,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
150,000150,000Construction/Maintenance
150,000 150,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
150,000150,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
150,000 150,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
8
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Park & Recreation Mgr
2021 2025
thru Department Parks Department
Description
Play Structures are replaced on a 20 year replacement schedule.
2020
Arden Manor Park last replaced in 1999 - $110,000
City is seeking grant funding to increase the scope of this project to include the play structure, fiber bedding, concrete work and drainage issues.
2025
Arden Oaks Park last replaced in 1999 - $126,000
2027
Freeway Park last replaced in 1998 - $130,000
Ingerson Park last replaced in 2000 - $130,000
2028
Floral Park last replaced in 2001 - $138,000
Sampson Park last replaced 2001- $138,000
2030
Royal Hills Park last replaced 2002 - $144,000
Project #20-Park-003
Priority 3 Important
Justification
In order to maintain playground structures that meet current safety guidelines, require a minimum amount of maintenance, and have replacement
parts available, the City is attempting to maintain a replacement schedule for playground facilities based on available funds.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Playground Structure Replacement Category Park Capital Equipment
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$916,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
236,000110,000 126,000Construction/Maintenance
110,000 126,000 236,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
236,000110,000 126,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
110,000 126,000 236,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
9
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Parks Department
Description
Replacement of warming house in Hazelnut Park.
The estimated cost of the warming house assumes construction of a wood frame structure on a concrete foundation - $90,000.
Additional access improvements may be required based on ADA standards.
Project #21-Park-002
Priority 4 Less Important
Justification
Warming house was lost to a fire in 2018. City cost for renting a portable warming house for the past two seasons is as follows:
2018-2019 $5,736
2019-2020 $4,069
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Hazelnut Park Warming House Category Park Maintenance
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$90,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
90,00090,000Construction/Maintenance
90,000 90,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
55,50055,500Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
34,50034,500Trade-In Value
90,000 90,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
10
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Parks Department
Description
Floral Park Tennis and Basketball Courts - Reconstruct 2022
$426,000
Freeway Park Basketball Court - Reconstruct 2025
$80,000
Arden Oaks Basketball Court - Reconstruct 2028
$80,000
Project #22-Park-001
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Proposed improvements are intended to maintain existing court surfaces. In general, a court surface life is approximately 25 years before cracks
and pavement deformation require full reconstruction. Routine crack filling to prolong court surfaces is being performed.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Hard Court Reconstruction Category Park Capital Improvements
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$586,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
506,000426,000 80,000Construction/Maintenance
426,000 80,000 506,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
506,000426,000 80,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
426,000 80,000 506,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
11
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Parks Department
Description
Repair or replace roof shingles at these two parks.
Project #23-Park-004
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Roofing materials are aging and deteriorating towards the end of the expected service life.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Perry & Cummings Park Roof Maintenance Category Park Capital Improvements
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$55,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
55,00055,000Construction/Maintenance
55,000 55,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
55,00055,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
55,000 55,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
12
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Public Safety
Description
Lake Johanna Fire Department provides a detailed capital budget which includes the costs to each City.
2021 - Vests, rescue boat, dashboard
Total Cost: $68,750
Arden Hills Cost: $17,188
2022 - Replace air bags, rescue tools
Total Cost: $58,000
Arden Hills Cost: $14,500
2024 - Radios, SCBA bottles
Total Cost: $9,600
Arden Hills Cost: $2,400
There is a placeholder each year of up to $15,000 based on historical analysis.
Project #21-Pub-001
Priority n/a
Justification
More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget.
Budget Impact/Other
There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a
result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs.
Useful LifeProject Name LJFD General Equipment Category Public Safety
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$151,690
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
76,69017,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
17,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 76,690Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
76,69017,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000Public Safety Capital Fund
17,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 76,690Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
13
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Public Safety
Description
Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows, the fire department has
budgeted for the replacement of Rescue/Chief/Utility vehicles in future years.
2021
Tires
Total Cost: $5,100
Arden Hills Cost: $1,275
2022
Vehicle Replacement
Total Cost: $82,000
Arden Hills Cost: $20,500
2024
Vehicle Replacement
Total Cost: $231,000
Arden Hills Cost: $57,750
Project #21-Pub-002
Priority n/a
Justification
More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget.
Budget Impact/Other
There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a
result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs.
Useful LifeProject Name LJFD Rescue/Chief/Utility Vehicle Replacement Category Public Safety
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$268,080
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
79,5301,280 20,500 57,750Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
1,280 20,500 57,750 79,530Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
79,5301,280 20,500 57,750Public Safety Capital Fund
1,280 20,500 57,750 79,530Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
14
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Public Safety
Description
Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows, below shows what the fire
department expects to spend on station related capital expenditures.
2021
Mattresses
Total Cost: $4,800
Arden Hills Cost: $1,190
2022
Interior painting, resurface bay floors
Total Cost: $63,000
Arden Hills Cost: $15,624
There is a placeholder each year of up to $10,000 based on historical analysis.
Project #21-Pub-004
Priority n/a
Justification
More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget.
Budget Impact/Other
There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a
result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs.
Useful LifeProject Name LJFD Station Capital Category Public Safety
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$96,810
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
46,8101,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
1,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000 46,810Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
46,8101,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000Public Safety Capital Fund
1,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000 46,810Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
15
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Public Safety
Description
Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows, the fire department has
budgeted for the replacement of a fire engine in future years.
2022
Engine Replacement
Total Cost: $750,000
Arden Hills Cost: $187,500
Project #22-Pub-001
Priority n/a
Justification
More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget.
Budget Impact/Other
There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a
result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs.
Useful LifeProject Name LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement Category Public Safety
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$1,172,500
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
187,500187,500Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
187,500 187,500Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
187,500187,500Public Safety Capital Fund
187,500 187,500Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
16
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Public Safety
Description
Construction of a new fire station.
Project #25-Pub-005
Priority n/a
Justification
Maintaining the fire station is critical to public safety.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Lake Johanna Fire Dept Fire Station Category Public Safety
Type Improvement
TCAAP
Total Project Cost:$1,170,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
195,000195,000Construction/Maintenance
195,000 195,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
195,000195,000Public Safety Capital Fund
195,000 195,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
17
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Sanitary Sewer Department
Description
Rehabilitation of lift stations to standardize and replace aging equipment, including pumps and electrical panels.
Lift Station 3 - Panel (2021) $48,000
Lift Station 14 - Pumps and panel (2022) $90,000
Lift Station 5 - Forcemain (2023) $210,000
Lift Station 8 - Pumps, base and electronics (2027) $90,000
Lift Station 2 - Pumps, base and electronics (2028) $75,000
Lift Station 5 - Pumps, base and electronics (2029) $77,000
Lift Station 7 - Pumps, base and electroncis (2030) $80,000
Project #21-Sew-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
The City has maintained a program to refurbish and update sanitary sewer lift stations on a 10-year cycle for reliability, technology and risk
management. The proposed improvements continue this program for the 14 sanitary lift stations within the City's wastewater collection system.
Budget Impact/Other
Reduced maintenance costs.
Useful Life 20
Project Name Lift Station Rehabilitation Category Sanitary Sewer Maintenance
Type Maintenance
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$670,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
348,00048,000 90,000 210,000Construction/Maintenance
48,000 90,000 210,000 348,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
348,00048,000 90,000 210,000Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
48,000 90,000 210,000 348,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
18
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Sanitary Sewer Department
Description
Sewer Lining and Rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system on a 2-year cycle.
Phase 1 (2021): Arden View Drive Neighborhood
Phase 2 (2023): Lift Station 4 area, Lift Station 5 area, Oak Avenue and Lake Valentine Road
Phase 3 (2025): Venus Avenue Neighborhood
Project #21-Sew-002
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
As part of our sanitary sewer program, lines found with holes and cracks allowing for infiltration should be lined or repaired as needed. As the
sewer infrastructure is aging, staff will continue to perform sewer inspections and identify locations needing sewer lining and other sewer
improvements.
Budget Impact/Other
This project will help the overall I&I reduction program.
Useful Life 30
Project Name Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation Category Sanitary Sewer Maintenance
Type Maintenance
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$1,425,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
725,000175,000 220,000 330,000Construction/Maintenance
175,000 220,000 330,000 725,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
725,000175,000 220,000 330,000Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
175,000 220,000 330,000 725,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
19
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Street and utility improvements consisting of removal of the existing bituminous pavement, subgrade correction, addition of concrete curb and
gutter, sanitary sewer repairs, water main replacement, storm sewer expansion, and new bituminous pavement are recommended along the
following roadways: Jerrold Avenue between New Brighton Road to 335 feet west of Prior Avenue; Glenpaul Avenue between New Brighton
Road and Cleveland Avenue; Prior Avenue between County Road D and 155 feet north of Jerrold Avenue (north termini).
Street and utility improvements consisting of full depth reclamation, concrete curb repairs, sanitary sewer service connection repairs, and storm
sewer structure repairs are recommended along the following roadways: Jerrold Avenue between 335 feet west of Prior Avenue to cul-de-sac (west
termini); and Edgewater Avenue between New Brighton Road and west cul-de-sac (west termini).
Project #21-Str-005
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Existing street pavement conditions are declining with Jerrold, Glenpaul and Prior below 20. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue
safe and reliable street and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated
street pavement within the City. Proposed water main improvements will provide for an orderly replacement of water distribution system assets as
the water system ages over time.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 30
Project Name 2021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$3,807,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
3,632,0003,632,000Construction/Maintenance
3,632,000 3,632,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
1,066,0001,066,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
822,000822,000Other
517,000517,000Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
567,000567,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
660,000660,000Water Utility Funds
3,632,000 3,632,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
20
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Ramsey County has plans to reconstruct Lexington Ave from County Road E to 694. This project includes a new traffic signal at the
Target/Lexington Station entrance and replacement of 12-inch diameter city water main along Lexington from Grey Fox to Red Fox Road.
Lexington Station property is responsible for Arden Hills' portion of the new traffic signal per PUD agreement 13-003.
Project #21-Str-006
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Improvements to Lexington Ave will improve access, circulation and safety for the traveling public.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Lexington Improvements Category Streets:Misc
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$1,033,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
1,013,0001,013,000Construction/Maintenance
1,013,000 1,013,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
448,000448,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
180,000180,000Other
385,000385,000Water Utility Funds
1,013,000 1,013,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
21
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Arden Oaks Dr / Arden Oaks Ct
Proposed improvements include spot repair to existing curb, repairs to storm sewer catch basins, hydrant repairs, and sanitary sewer manhole and
casting repairs. Pavement is proposed to be milled or full depth reclamation with new bituminous pavement.
Project #22-Str-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Existing street pavement conditions are declining with ratings below 35. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street
and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement within
the City.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 30
Project Name Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$822,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
822,000822,000Construction/Maintenance
822,000 822,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
350,000350,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
350,000350,000Other
42,00042,000Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
60,00060,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
20,00020,000Water Utility Funds
822,000 822,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
22
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Reconstruction of Old Snelling Avenue from County Road E to Highway 51 (Snelling Ave).
Three alternatives are currently being considered for roadway and utility improvements: 1) full reconstruction of the street, addition of storm
sewer, replacement of segments of water main and sanitary sewer, and the addition of a 8 - 10 foot wide trail along the west side of the roadway
($3,630,000); 2) full reconstruction of the street, scaled down improvements to storm sewer, and replacement of water main and sanitary sewer
segments, no trail ($2,520,000); and 3) reclamation of roadway pavement and placement of new pavement, no trail and limited spot repairs to
water and sanitary sewer ($965,000).
Entry as shown is for Alternative 3, but a final recommendation has not been made and Council has not determined preferred alternative.
Project #22-Str-003
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
This segment of roadway is highly deteriorated and requires significant maintenance each year by the Public Works Department. Proposed
improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street and utility services.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$965,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
965,000965,000Construction/Maintenance
965,000 965,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
475,000475,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
425,000425,000Other
20,00020,000Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
20,00020,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
25,00025,000Water Utility Funds
965,000 965,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
23
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Pavement Management Program (PMP) improvements consisting of spot curb repair, resurfacing or full depth reclamation and new bituminous
pavement, repairs to storm sewer inlets, repairs to sanitary sewer manholes and castings, hydrant and valve repairs. Street segments include
Colleen Avenue/McClung (Hamline to Snelling), Brian Knoll Drive & Ct, Norma Avenue (Colleen to Dawn Circle), Arden Vista Ct, and Royal
Hills (Snelling to Arden View Dr).
Project #23-Str-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Pavement conditions are deteriorating with condition ratings from 25 to 52. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable
street and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement
within the City.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$1,872,500
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
1,872,5001,872,500Construction/Maintenance
1,872,500 1,872,500Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
900,000900,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
900,000900,000Other
7,5007,500Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
45,00045,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
20,00020,000Water Utility Funds
1,872,500 1,872,500Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
24
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Pavement Management Program (PMP) improvements consisting of spot curb repair, resurfacing or full depth reclamation and new bituminous
pavement, repairs to storm sewer inlets, repairs to sanitary sewer manholes and castings, hydrant and valve repairs. Street segments include: Karth
Lake Dr (Pleasant Dr to Cul-de-Sac), Pleasant Drive (Amble to Karth Lake Dr), Pleasant Circle, Amble Drive (Karth Lake Dr to Lexington
Avenue), and Stowe Ave (New Brighton to Lake Johanna).
Project #24-Str-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Pavement conditions are showing distress with condition ratings from 33 to 59, with exception of one segment of Pleasant Dr. Pavement
conditions will continue to decline by 2024. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street and utility services. These
improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement within the City.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets and Stowe Ave Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$1,357,500
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
1,357,5001,357,500Construction/Maintenance
1,357,500 1,357,500Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
650,000650,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
650,000650,000Other
7,5007,500Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
30,00030,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
20,00020,000Water Utility Funds
1,357,500 1,357,500Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
25
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Street Department
Description
Pavement Management Program (PMP) improvements consisting of spot curb repair, resurfacing or full depth reclamation and new bituminous
pavement, repairs to storm sewer inlets, repairs to sanitary sewer manholes and castings, hydrant and valve repairs. Street segments include:
Benton Way loop south of Harriet, Tiller Lane (Lexington to Cannon Ave), Cannon Ave (Tiller Ln to Dunlap) and Dunlap (Cannon Ave to Tiller
Lane).
Project #25-Str-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Pavement conditions are showing distress with condition ratings from 15 to 59. Pavement conditions will continue to decline by 2025. Proposed
improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for
patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement within the City.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace Category Streets: Reconstruction
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$907,500
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
907,500907,500Construction/Maintenance
907,500 907,500Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
430,000430,000Capital Improvement Funds
(PIR)
430,000430,000Other
7,5007,500Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
20,00020,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
20,00020,000Water Utility Funds
907,500 907,500Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
26
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Surface Water Management D
Description
Drainage improvement on the south end of Karth Lake. City received a grant from the Rice Creek Watershed District to design and construct
drainage improvements to reduce sediment transport and erosion at this location.
Project #21-Storm-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Surface drainage is being conveyed from impervious surfaces north of Cummings Park Drive onto a steep slope that is eroding and transporting
sediment onto a Ctiy trail and downstream towards Karth Lake. Improvements will stabilize the slope, reduce erosion and reduce sediment
conveyed to Karth Lake.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20
Project Name Karth Lake Runoff Control Category Storm Water Maintenance
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$180,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
180,000180,000Construction/Maintenance
180,000 180,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
90,00090,000Grants
90,00090,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
180,000 180,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
27
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Surface Water Management D
Description
Replace failing retaining wall adjacent to the west bank of Karth Lake at the lake outlet pump. Staff will investigate alternatives, including
repair/replacement of wall and removal of wall with bank stabiliztion measures. Short term repairs will be made to redirect drainage from being
conveyed over the top of the wall.
Project #23-Storm-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Existing retaining wall is in need of repairs.
Budget Impact/Other
Prevent erosion and address park safety issues.
Useful Life 20
Project Name Karth Lake retaining wall Category Storm Water Maintenance
Type Improvement
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$65,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
65,00065,000Construction/Maintenance
65,000 65,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
65,00065,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
65,000 65,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
28
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Surface Water Management D
Description
This project is the first phase of a program to address accumulated sediment within stormwater ponds in the City's drainage system to maintain
system compliance with State MS4 requirements. Staff measured sediment accumulation in several ponds in 2019/2020 and identified the Benton
Way pond in 2023 ($225,000) and the Glen Arden pond in 2026 ($160,000) as the higher priority maintenance locations within the drainage
system.
Project #23-Storm-002
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Maintenance is required by the City's MS4 permit issued by the MPCA.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20-25
Project Name Storm Pond and Outfall Maintenance Category Storm Water Maintenance
Type Maintenance
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$495,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
225,000225,000Construction/Maintenance
225,000 225,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
225,000225,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility
Funds
225,000 225,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
29
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Water Department
Description
Evaluate condition of 16" water main between North and South towers to determine the degree of corrosion and deterioration. The evaluation will
develop a long-term plan for rehabilitation of this critical water main segment.
Project #21-W-002
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
The trunk water main extending between the north and south elevated storage tanks is one of the most important and critical segments of the water
distribution system for supplying water to the northern portion of the City. Segments of the water main have been in service for more than 52 years.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 10
Project Name Trunk Water Main Evaluation Category Utility Maintenance
Type Unassigned
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$365,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
65,00065,000Construction/Maintenance
65,000 65,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
65,00065,000Water Utility Funds
65,000 65,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
30
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Water Department
Description
2022 - South Water Tower maintenance.
Clean, inspect and repair tank interior of this 1 million gallon storage facility in accordance with MN Department of Health guidelines.
2024 - North Water Tower maintenance.
Clean, inspect and repair tank interior of this 500,000 gallon storage facility in accordance with MN Department of Health guidelines.
Listed costs are estimates only. Inspections will determine the extent of minor repairs required.
Project #22-W-001
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
The MN Department of Health recommends that storage facilities for public water supply systems are inspected and maintained on a 5-year cycle.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 10
Project Name Water Tower Maintenance Category Utility Maintenance
Type Unassigned
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$135,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
135,00075,000 60,000Construction/Maintenance
75,000 60,000 135,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
135,00075,000 60,000Water Utility Funds
75,000 60,000 135,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
31
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Water Department
Description
Rehabilitation of pumps, motors, electrical system and building components. This project begins a proactive process to address aging mechanical
equipment to minimize station failures and unscheduled outages. Staff will conduct further evaluation of system components to identify specific
improvements and refine cost estimates.
Project #25-W-002
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
The booster station is a critical component of the water distribution system to supply water to the northern portion of the City. Proactive
rehabilitation will better manage risks associated with water supply disruptions.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 20
Project Name Booster Station Improvements Category Utility Maintenance
Type Unassigned
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$90,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
90,00090,000Construction/Maintenance
90,000 90,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
90,00090,000Water Utility Funds
90,000 90,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
32
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
2021 2025thru
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Department Project # Priority
Equipment
20-EqpV-001 135,000135,000Replace International Plow Truck (Unit 120) n/a
21-Eqp-001 60,00060,000Replace 1997 Toro Groundsmaster (Unit 409) 3
21-Eqp-003 30,00030,000Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers (458 & 459)3
21-Eqp-004 16,00016,000Portable Message Board 4
21-Eqp-005 10,00010,000Add Portable Light Tower 4
22-Eqp-006 10,00010,000Replace 2005 Felling Trailer (Unit 414)4
22-Eqp-007 25,00025,000Replace 2001 Toro Workman (Unit 411)3
22-EqpV-002 36,00036,000Building Inspector Vehicle (Unit 504)n/a
23-EqpV-002 80,00080,000Replace F-450 Truck (Unit 211)3
24-Eqp-002 10,00010,000Replace 1996 Wacker 880 Roller (Unit 106)3
24-EqpV-001 160,000160,000Replace Sterling Acterra Truck (Unit 431)3
24-EqpV-002 250,000100,000 150,000Replace 2012 Int'l Plow Wing Truck (115)n/a
25-Eqp-001 80,00080,000Replace 2018 Toro Large Area Mower (Unit 457)3
902,000251,000 71,000 80,000 270,000 230,000Equipment Total
GRAND TOTAL 902,000251,000 71,000 80,000 270,000 230,000
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software 33
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace 2011 International Plow Truck #120.
Mileage 29,590
Project #20-EqpV-001
Priority n/a
Justification
Truck will be 10 years old. The purchase is being split between 2020 and 2021.
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $5,200
2019 - $13,249
Budget Impact/Other
Maintenance and repairs.
Useful Life 15-17
Project Name Replace International Plow Truck (Unit 120)Category Vehicles
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$243,963
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
135,000135,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
135,000 135,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
135,000135,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
135,000 135,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
34
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace Equipment # 409 - 1997 Toro Groundsmaster.
Vehicle # 85409
Hours 2,925
Project #21-Eqp-001
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $1,300
2019 - $325
Equipment will be 24 years old.
Used for trail and off-road mowing. Machine is 4wd and replacement parts are becoming more difficult to find due to age.
Budget Impact/Other
Reduce equipment repairs and maintenance costs.
Useful Life 10
Project Name Replace 1997 Toro Groundsmaster (Unit 409)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$60,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
60,00060,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
60,000 60,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
60,00060,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
60,000 60,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
35
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace Two 2018 Toro "Z" Lawn Mowers.
458 Hours 518
459 Hours 569
Project #21-Eqp-003
Priority 3 Important
Justification
The trade in value of the Toro "Z" mowers is maximized if they are traded in with warrany still remaining. Due to the amount of time these pieces
of equipment are used during the summer months, they are traded in on a three year cycle.
Parts and labor costs:
#458
2018 - $850
2019 - $730
#459
2018 - $1,050
2019 - $925
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 5
Project Name Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers (458 & 459)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$30,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
30,00030,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
30,000 30,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
30,00030,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
30,000 30,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
36
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Purchase trailer mount message board for traffic control functions and prewarning messages. This will replace the truck mount message board on
unit #210.
Project #21-Eqp-004
Priority 4 Less Important
Justification
Existing message board is a 2006 model purchased used from Ramsey County. Parts are very difficult to find and a trailer mount board will not tie
up a truck in the field.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 13-15
Project Name Portable Message Board Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$16,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
16,00016,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
16,000 16,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
16,00016,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
16,000 16,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
37
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Add generator powered towable light tower.
Project #21-Eqp-005
Priority 4 Less Important
Justification
Public Works staff is currently working in dark conditions loading and unloading trucks during after hour emergencies. The light would also be
used on job sights when needed. It is OSHA work space compliant.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 13-15
Project Name Add Portable Light Tower Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$10,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
10,00010,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
10,000 10,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
10,00010,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
10,000 10,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
38
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace 2005 Felling lift gate trailer due to corrosion.
Project #22-Eqp-006
Priority 4 Less Important
Justification
Replace the 2005 Felling trailer with a 22 foot trailer with better ergonomics, due to corrosion.
Parts and labor costs:
2019 - $430
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 13-15
Project Name Replace 2005 Felling Trailer (Unit 414)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$10,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
10,00010,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
10,000 10,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
10,00010,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
10,000 10,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
39
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace the 2001 Toro Workman with field painter (unit 411).
Hours 2,045
Project #22-Eqp-007
Priority 3 Important
Justification
The workman will be 21 years old in 2022 and is used almost every day during the summer. It is reaching the end of its useful (dependable) life.
The paint sprayer will also be replaced.
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $1,700
2019 - $825
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 13-15
Project Name Replace 2001 Toro Workman (Unit 411)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$25,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
25,00025,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
25,000 25,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
25,00025,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
25,000 25,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
40
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact City Administrator
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Purchase a new inspection vehicle in 2022 to replace 2013 Ford Escape.
Project #22-EqpV-002
Priority n/a
Justification
The current vehicle will be 9 years old. A multipurpose vehicle, like an Escape, will serve other City employees when they want to use a City
vehicle to attend meetings and conferences - especially when they are out of town.
Parts and labor costs:
2019 - $1,205
Budget Impact/Other
Cost of maintenance.
Useful Life 10
Project Name Building Inspector Vehicle (Unit 504)Category Vehicles
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$36,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
36,00036,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
36,000 36,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
36,00036,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
36,000 36,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
41
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace Vehicle #211 - 2011 Ford F450 crane truck.
VIN #8243
Mileage 73,251
Project #23-EqpV-002
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $2,200
2019 - $308
This vehicle is used when dealing with emergency lift station work. Reliability is a major concern. The condition of the current vehicle will be
evaluated prior to replacement.
Budget Impact/Other
Reduced repair and maintenance costs.
Useful Life 8-10
Project Name Replace F-450 Truck (Unit 211)Category Vehicles
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$80,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
80,00080,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
80,000 80,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
80,00080,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
80,000 80,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
42
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace Equipment #106 - 1996 Wacker Roller.
VIN # 673603994
Hours: 883
This piece of equipment was included in previous CIP's but has been deferred to allow time to determine the size roller that would work best based
on the amount of work the PW staff is able to complete. Also, staff evaluates its condition each year to evaulate its reliability.
Project #24-Eqp-002
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Equipment will be 28 years old.
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $425
2019 - $130
Budget Impact/Other
Reduced equipment repair costs.
Useful Life 15-17
Project Name Replace 1996 Wacker 880 Roller (Unit 106)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$10,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
10,00010,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
10,000 10,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
10,00010,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
10,000 10,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
43
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Community Devl Dir
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replace 2009 1,500 gallon tanker truck used for watering, sweeping, dust control and rink flooding.
Mileage 22,698
Hours 2,885
Project #24-EqpV-001
Priority 3 Important
Justification
Current vehicle will be 15 years old in 2024.
Corrosion due to winter operations and availability of parts.
Parts and labor costs:
2018 - $1,800
2019 - $2,618
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 10
Project Name Replace Sterling Acterra Truck (Unit 431)Category Vehicles
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$160,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
160,000160,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
160,000 160,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
160,000160,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
160,000 160,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
44
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Vehicle #115 - 2012 International Plow Wing Truck
Mileage 20,275
Hours 1,855
Project #24-EqpV-002
Priority n/a
Justification
Vehicle will be 13 years old.
Repair costs for parts and labor:
2019 - $5,863
This is one of our two large dump trucks used primarily for plowing and de-icing streets. While the mileage on this vehicle is relatively low, due to
the corrosiveness of salt, the frame and bodies are beginning to deteriorate. With only two dump trucks in the snow plow fleet it is imperative that
they be dependable during snow events.
Budget Impact/Other
Reduce repair and maintenance costs and improve reliability of our primary snow removal equipment.
Useful Life 10-12
Project Name Replace 2012 Int'l Plow Wing Truck (115)Category Vehicles
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$250,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
250,000100,000 150,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
100,000 150,000 250,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
250,000100,000 150,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
100,000 150,000 250,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
45
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director
2021 2025
thru Department Equipment
Description
Replacement of the 2018 Toro large area mower.
Project #25-Eqp-001
Priority 3 Important
Justification
The Toro large area mower will be 7 years old in 2025. Repairs are still under warranty. Service costs in 2019 were $230.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful Life 10-12
Project Name Replace 2018 Toro Large Area Mower (Unit 457)Category Equipment: Public Works
Type Equipment
TCAAP No
Total Project Cost:$80,000
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Expenditures
80,00080,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
80,000 80,000Total
Total2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Funding Sources
80,00080,000Equipment/Building
Replacement Fund
80,000 80,000Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
46
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
2021 2025thru
TotalSource Project # Priority 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Capital Improvement Funds (PIR)
20-Park-003 236,000110,000 126,000Playground Structure Replacement 3
21-Park-002 55,50055,500Hazelnut Park Warming House 4
21-Str-005 1,066,0001,066,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
21-Str-006 448,000448,000Lexington Improvements 2
22-Park-001 506,000426,000 80,000Hard Court Reconstruction 3
22-Str-001 350,000350,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 475,000475,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
23-Park-004 55,00055,000Perry & Cummings Park Roof Maintenance 3
23-Str-001 900,000900,000Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 650,000650,000Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets 2
25-Str-001 430,000430,000Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
5,171,5001,679,500 1,251,000 955,000 650,000 636,000Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) Total
EDA General Fund
22-EDA-001 286,130246,130 40,000Gateway Signs n/a
286,130246,130 40,000EDA General Fund Total
Equipment/Building Replacement Fun
20-EqpV-001 135,000135,000Replace International Plow Truck (Unit 120) n/a
21-Bldg-005 250,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000City Hall Maintenance 2
21-Bldg-006 260,000260,000City Hall parking lot 3
21-Eqp-001 60,00060,000Replace 1997 Toro Groundsmaster (Unit 409) 3
21-Eqp-003 30,00030,000Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers (458 & 459) 3
21-Eqp-004 16,00016,000Portable Message Board 4
21-Eqp-005 10,00010,000Add Portable Light Tower 4
22-Eqp-006 10,00010,000Replace 2005 Felling Trailer (Unit 414)4
22-Eqp-007 25,00025,000Replace 2001 Toro Workman (Unit 411)3
22-EqpV-002 36,00036,000Building Inspector Vehicle (Unit 504)n/a
23-EqpV-002 80,00080,000Replace F-450 Truck (Unit 211)3
24-Eqp-002 10,00010,000Replace 1996 Wacker 880 Roller (Unit 106)3
24-EqpV-001 160,000160,000Replace Sterling Acterra Truck (Unit 431)3
24-EqpV-002 250,000100,000 150,000Replace 2012 Int'l Plow Wing Truck (115)n/a
25-Bldg-002 150,000150,000City Hall roof 3
25-Eqp-001 80,00080,000Replace 2018 Toro Large Area Mower (Unit 457)3
1,562,000561,000 121,000 130,000 320,000 430,000Equipment/Building Replacement Fund
Total
Grants
21-Storm-001 90,00090,000Karth Lake Runoff Control 2
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
47
TotalSource Project # Priority 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
90,00090,000Grants Total
Other
21-Str-005 822,000822,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
21-Str-006 180,000180,000Lexington Improvements 2
22-Str-001 350,000350,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 425,000425,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
23-Str-001 900,000900,000Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 650,000650,000Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets 2
25-Str-001 430,000430,000Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
3,757,0001,002,000 775,000 900,000 650,000 430,000Other Total
Public Safety Capital Fund
21-Pub-001 76,69017,190 14,500 15,000 15,000 15,000LJFD General Equipment n/a
21-Pub-002 79,5301,280 20,500 57,750LJFD Rescue/Chief/Utility Vehicle Replacement n/a
21-Pub-004 46,8101,190 15,620 10,000 10,000 10,000LJFD Station Capital n/a
22-Pub-001 187,500187,500LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement n/a
25-Pub-005 195,000195,000Lake Johanna Fire Dept Fire Station n/a
585,53019,660 238,120 25,000 82,750 220,000Public Safety Capital Fund Total
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
21-Sew-001 348,00048,000 90,000 210,000Lift Station Rehabilitation 2
21-Sew-002 725,000175,000 220,000 330,000Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 2
21-Str-005 517,000517,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
22-Str-001 42,00042,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 20,00020,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
23-Str-001 7,5007,500Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 7,5007,500Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets 2
25-Str-001 7,5007,500Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
1,674,500740,000 152,000 437,500 7,500 337,500Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund Total
Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds
21-Storm-001 90,00090,000Karth Lake Runoff Control 2
21-Str-005 567,000567,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
22-Str-001 60,00060,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 20,00020,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
23-Storm-001 65,00065,000Karth Lake retaining wall 2
23-Storm-002 225,000225,000Storm Pond and Outfall Maintenance 2
23-Str-001 45,00045,000Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 30,00030,000Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets 2
25-Str-001 20,00020,000Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
1,122,000657,000 80,000 335,000 30,000 20,000Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds Total
Trade-In Value
21-Park-002 34,50034,500Hazelnut Park Warming House 4
34,50034,500Trade-In Value Total
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
48
TotalSource Project # Priority 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Water Utility Funds
21-Str-005 660,000660,0002021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood 2
21-Str-006 385,000385,000Lexington Improvements 2
21-W-002 65,00065,000Trunk Water Main Evaluation 2
22-Str-001 20,00020,000Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets 2
22-Str-003 25,00025,000Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 51 2
22-W-001 135,00075,000 60,000Water Tower Maintenance 2
23-Str-001 20,00020,000Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista 2
24-Str-001 20,00020,000Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets 2
25-Str-001 20,00020,000Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace 2
25-W-002 90,00090,000Booster Station Improvements 2
1,440,0001,110,000 120,000 20,000 80,000 110,000Water Utility Funds Total
15,723,1605,893,660 2,983,250 2,802,500 1,860,250 2,183,500GRAND TOTAL
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
49
50
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
2021 2025thru
EDA General Fund
Source 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
560,393 531,353 252,913 217,743 139,633Beginning Balance
Revenues and Other Fund Sources
Revenue
3,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000Miscellaneous Revenues
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Tax Levy
103,500 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000Total
663,893 634,353 355,913 320,743 242,633Total Funds Available
103,500 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources
Expenditures and Uses
Capital Projects & Equipment
Economic Development
0 (246,130) 0 (40,000)0Gateway Signs 22-EDA-001
0 (246,130) 0 (40,000)0Total
Other Uses
(92,540) (95,310) (98,170) (101,110) (104,140)Operating Expenditures
(40,000) (40,000) (40,000) (40,000) (40,000)Tax Abatement
(132,540) (135,310) (138,170) (141,110) (144,140)Total
(132,540) (381,440) (138,170) (181,110) (144,140)Total Expenditures and Uses
531,353 252,913 217,743 139,633 98,493Ending Balance
(29,040) (278,440) (35,170) (78,110) (41,140)Change in Fund Balance
Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
51
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Equipment/Building Replacement FundBeginning Balance 294,445 21,445 (189,555) 39,445 259,445 289,445 Revenues and Other Fund SourcesTransfers from Utility funds300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Tax Levy50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Total Funds Available644,445 371,445 160,445 389,445 609,445 639,445 Expenditures and UsesHVAC(350,000) - - - - - Parking Lot(40,000) (260,000) - - - - Roof- - - - - (150,000) Maintenance/repair placeholder- (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Vehicles(197,900) (135,000) (36,000) (80,000) (260,000) (150,000) Equipment(35,100) (116,000) (35,000) - (10,000) (80,000) Total Expenditures and Uses(623,000) (561,000) (121,000) (130,000) (320,000) (430,000) Change in Fund Balance(273,000) (211,000) 229,000 220,000 30,000 (80,000) Ending Balance 21,445 (189,555) 39,445 259,445 289,445 209,445 ‐$400.0‐$200.0$0.0$200.0$400.020212022202320242025Thousands52
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Public Safety Capital FundBeginning Balance (5,198) 20,322 143,662 98,542 316,542 526,792 624,792 579,792 445,242 70,242 (156,758) Revenues and Other Fund SourcesCharitable Gambling23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Transfer from General Fund417,000 - - - - - - - - - - Tax Levy70,000 120,000 170,000 220,000 270,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources510,000 143,000 193,000 243,000 293,000 318,000 318,000 318,000 318,000 318,000 318,000 Total Funds Available504,802 163,322 336,662 341,542 609,542 844,792 942,792 897,792 763,242 388,242 161,242 Expenditures and UsesLJFD General Equipment20-Pub-001 (11,730) (17,190) (14,500) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) LJFD Rescue/Chief/Utility Vehicle Replacement20-Pub-002 (37,200) (1,280) (20,500) - (57,750) - (143,000) (22,550) (23,000) - - LJFD Station Capital20-Pub-004(18,550) (1,190) (15,620) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement22-Pub-001- - (187,500) - - - - (210,000) (450,000) (325,000) - Lake Johanna Fire Dept Fire Station25-Pub-005 (417,000) - - - - (195,000) (195,000) (195,000) (195,000) (195,000) (195,000) Total Expenditures and Uses(484,480) (19,660) (238,120) (25,000) (82,750) (220,000) (363,000) (452,550) (693,000) (545,000) (220,000) Change in Fund Balance25,520 123,340 (45,120) 218,000 210,250 98,000 (45,000) (134,550) (375,000) (227,000) 98,000 Ending Balance 20,322 143,662 98,542 316,542 526,792 624,792 579,792 445,242 70,242 (156,758) (58,758) ‐$0.2$0.0$0.2$0.4$0.6$0.82021202220232024202520262027202820292030Millions53
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Sanitary Sewer Utility FundBeginning Balance 469,966 110,576 367,236 367,636 828,506 986,226 1,347,246 1,462,946 1,987,091 2,541,591 Revenues and Other Fund SourcesOperating Revenue2,183,670 2,259,620 2,338,230 2,419,580 2,503,780 2,590,930 2,681,120 2,774,460 2,871,070 2,971,060 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources2,183,670 2,259,620 2,338,230 2,419,580 2,503,780 2,590,930 2,681,120 2,774,460 2,871,070 2,971,060 Total Funds Available 2,653,636 2,370,196 2,705,466 2,787,216 3,332,286 3,577,156 4,028,366 4,237,406 4,858,161 5,512,651 Expenditures and UseLift Station Rehabilitation21-Sew-001 (48,000) (90,000) (210,000) - - - (90,000) (75,000) (77,000) (80,000) Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation21-Sew-002(175,000) - (220,000) - (330,000) - (350,000) - - (350,000) 2021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood21-Str-005(517,000) - - - - - - - - - Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets22-Str-001- (42,000) - - - - - - - - Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 5122-Str-003- (20,000) - - - - - - - - Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista23-Str-001- - (7,500) - - - - - - - Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets24-Str-001- - - (7,500) - - - - - - Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace25-Str-001- - - - (7,500) - - - - - Cummings/Northwoods/Red Fox/Grey Fox Resurface26-Str-001- - - - - (7,500) - - - - Old Snelling Ave/CR E Intersection Improvements 26-Str-002- - - - - (160,000) - - - - Chatham/McCracken/Fairview/Brighton Way Resurface27-Str-001- - - - - - (7,500) - - - Debt Service(40,650) (39,450) (38,250) (37,050) (40,750) (39,350) (37,950) (36,725) (40,600) - Operating Expenses(1,636,410) (1,685,510) (1,736,080) (1,788,160) (1,841,810) (1,897,060) (1,953,970) (2,012,590) (2,072,970) (2,135,170) Operating transfer to Equipment Fund(126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) Total Expenditures and Uses(2,543,060) (2,002,960) (2,337,830) (1,958,710) (2,346,060) (2,229,910) (2,565,420) (2,250,315) (2,316,570) (2,691,170) Change in Fund Balance(359,390) 256,660 400 460,870 157,720 361,020 115,700 524,145 554,500 279,890 Ending Balance110,576 367,236 367,636 828,506 986,226 1,347,246 1,462,946 1,987,091 2,541,591 2,821,481 $0.0$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.02021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Millions54
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Surface Water Mgmt Utility FundsBeginning Balance 203,540 (157,450) 52,170 40 245,770 493,970 581,230 818,120 1,071,200 1,315,020 Revenues and Other Fund SourcesOperating Revenue888,300 897,160 906,110 915,150 924,280 933,500 942,810 952,210 961,710 971,300 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources888,300 897,160 906,110 915,150 924,280 933,500 942,810 952,210 961,710 971,300 Total Funds Available 1,091,840 739,710 958,280 915,190 1,170,050 1,427,470 1,524,040 1,770,330 2,032,910 2,286,320 Expenditures and Uses2021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood21-Str-005 (567,000) - - - - - - - - - Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets22-Str-001- (60,000) - - - - - - - - Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 5122-Str-003- (20,000) - - - - - - - - Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista23-Str-001- - (45,000) - - - - - - - Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets24-Str-001- - - (30,000) - - - - - - Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace25-Str-001- - - - (20,000) - - - - - Cummings/Northwoods/Red Fox/Grey Fox Resurface26-Str-001- - - - - (23,000) - - - - Chatham/McCracken/Fairview/Brighton Way Resurface27-Str-001- - - - - - (25,000) - - - Karth Lake Runoff Control21-Storm-001(90,000) - - - - - - - - - Karth Lake retaining wall23-Storm-001- - (65,000) - - - - - - - Storm Pond and Outfall Maintenance23-Storm-002- - (225,000) - - (160,000) - - - (110,000) Operating Expenses(518,290) (533,540) (549,240) (565,420) (582,080) (589,240) (606,920) (625,130) (643,890) (663,210) Transfer to Equipment Fund(74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) (74,000) Total Expenditures and Uses(1,249,290) (687,540) (958,240) (669,420) (676,080) (846,240) (705,920) (699,130) (717,890) (847,210) Change in Fund Balance(360,990) 209,620 (52,130) 245,730 248,200 87,260 236,890 253,080 243,820 124,090 Ending Balance(157,450) 52,170 40 245,770 493,970 581,230 818,120 1,071,200 1,315,020 1,439,110 ‐$0.5$0.0$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.02021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Millions55
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Water Utility FundsBeginning Balance 1,242,181 426,271 700,681 1,072,981 1,377,811 1,649,761 1,498,391 1,843,351 2,198,021 2,545,656 Revenues and Other Fund SourcesOperating Revenue2,500,480 2,659,150 2,711,760 2,765,430 2,820,160 2,875,990 2,932,940 2,991,020 3,050,270 3,110,700 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources2,500,480 2,659,150 2,711,760 2,765,430 2,820,160 2,875,990 2,932,940 2,991,020 3,050,270 3,110,700 Total Funds Available 3,742,661 3,085,421 3,412,441 3,838,411 4,197,971 4,525,751 4,431,331 4,834,371 5,248,291 5,656,356 Expenditures and Uses2021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood21-Str-005 (660,000) - - - - - - - - - Lexington Improvements21-Str-006(385,000) - - - - - - - - - Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets22-Str-001- (20,000) - - - - - - - - Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 5122-Str-003- (25,000) - - - - - - - - Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista23-Str-001- - (20,000) - - - - - - - Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets24-Str-001- - - (20,000) - - - - - - Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace25-Str-001- - - - (20,000) - - - - - Cummings/Northwoods/Red Fox/Grey Fox Resurface26-Str-001- - - - - (20,000) - - - - Old Snelling Ave/CR E Intersection Improvements 26-Str-002- - - - - (205,000) - - - - Chatham/McCracken/Fairview/Brighton Way Resurface 27-Str-001- - - - - - (20,000) - - - Trunk Water Main Evaluation21-W-002(65,000) - - - - (300,000) - - - - Water Tower Maintenance22-W-001- (75,000) - (60,000) - - - - - - Booster Station Improvements25-W-002- - - - (90,000) - - - - - Debt Service(248,150) (250,750) (248,050) (250,050) (246,750) (248,150) (249,150) (250,950) (248,675) - Operating Expenses(1,858,240) (1,913,990) (1,971,410) (2,030,550) (2,091,460) (2,154,210) (2,218,830) (2,285,400) (2,353,960) (2,424,580) Transfer to Equipment Fund(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Total Expenditures and Uses(3,316,390) (2,384,740) (2,339,460) (2,460,600) (2,548,210) (3,027,360) (2,587,980) (2,636,350) (2,702,635) (2,524,580) Change in Fund Balance(815,910) 274,410 372,300 304,830 271,950 (151,370) 344,960 354,670 347,635 586,120 Ending Balance426,271 700,681 1,072,981 1,377,811 1,649,761 1,498,391 1,843,351 2,198,021 2,545,656 3,131,776 $0.0$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.0$3.52021202220232024202520262027202820292030Millions56
City of Arden Hills, MinnesotaCapital Improvement PlanSOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Capital Improvement Funds (PIR)Beginning Balance 3,762,604 5,606,913 3,596,903 2,398,243 1,445,943 990,203 773,603 799,453 74,403 441,303 1,384,873 Revenues and Other Fund SourcesDonations - Bethel100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 - - - - - - - Interest Income75,000 75,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 60,000 Net Assessments285,600 (755,510) (422,660) (447,300) (80,740) 144,400 105,850 174,950 447,900 643,570 643,570 MSA State Street Aid advance1,541,749 - - - - - - - - - - Tax Levy250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources2,252,349 (330,510) 52,340 2,700 194,260 419,400 380,850 449,950 722,900 943,570 953,570 Total Funds Available 6,014,953 5,276,403 3,649,243 2,400,943 1,640,203 1,409,603 1,154,453 1,249,403 797,303 1,384,873 2,338,443 Expenditures and UsesPrior year projects - final costs(223,040) - - - - - - - - - - Playground Structure Replacement20-Park-003- (110,000) - - - (126,000) - (260,000) (276,000) - (144,000) Hazelnut Park Warming House21-Park-002- (55,500) - - - - - - - - - Hard Court Reconstruction22-Park-001- - (426,000) - - (80,000) - - (80,000) - - Perry & Cummings Park Roof Maintenance23-Park-004- - - (55,000) - - - - - - - Park Shelter Roof Replacements26-Park-004- - - - - - (120,000) - - - - Hazelnut Park Parking Lot27-Park-004- - - - - - - (185,000) - - - Perry Park Parking Lot27-Park-005- - - - - - - (240,000) - - - Hamline Avenue crosswalks(60,000) - - - - - - - - - - 2021 PMP - Hazelnut Neighborhood21-Str-005(125,000) (1,066,000) - - - - - - - - - Lexington Improvements21-Str-006- (448,000) - - - - - - - - - Arden Oaks Neighborhood Streets22-Str-001- - (350,000) - - - - - - - - Old Snelling Ave PMP, CR E - Hwy 5122-Str-003- - (475,000) - - - - - - - - Colleen/Norma/Briar Knoll/Royal Hills/Arden Vista23-Str-001- - - (900,000) - - - - - - - Karth Lake East Neighborhood Streets24-Str-001- - - - (650,000) - - - - - - Tiller/Dunlap/Benton Way Resurface/Replace25-Str-001- - - - - (430,000) - - - - - Cummings/Northwoods/Red Fox/Grey Fox Resurface26-Str-001- - - - - - (235,000) - - - - Chatham/McCracken/Fairview/Brighton Way Resurface27-Str-001- - - - - - - (490,000) - - - Total Expenditures and Uses(408,040) (1,679,500) (1,251,000) (955,000) (650,000) (636,000) (355,000) (1,175,000) (356,000) - (144,000) Change in Fund Balance1,844,309 (2,010,010) (1,198,660) (952,300) (455,740) (216,600) 25,850 (725,050) 366,900 943,570 809,570 Ending Balance 5,606,913 3,596,903 2,398,243 1,445,943 990,203 773,603 799,453 74,403 441,303 1,384,873 2,194,443 Mounds View High School Trail (net city cost)- - - - (590,000) - - - - - - Snelling Avenue Trail (net city cost- - - - (460,000) - - - - - - Adjusted Ending Balance5,606,913 3,596,903 2,398,243 1,445,943 (59,797) (276,397) (250,547) (975,597) (608,697) 334,873 1,144,443 $0.0$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.0$3.5$4.02021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Millions57
STOWE AVE
LA
K
E
V
A
L
E
N
T
I
N
E
R
D
RED FOX RD
GREY FOX RD
INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA
M
B
L
E
D
R
SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLEEN AVE
GLEN PAUL AVE
TILLER LN
HAMLINEVENUS AVE
THOM DR
ARDEN VIEW DR
GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVE
AMBLE RD
NOBLE RD
GRAMSIE RD
ARDEN PL
GRANT RD
OAK AVE
EDGEWATER AVE
JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE
FLORAL DR W
GLENVIEW AVE
KARTH LAKE DR
GATEWA
Y
B
L
V
D
WYNCREST
CARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR
ROYAL LN
KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRYSTAL AVE PLEASANT DRA R D E N OAKS DR
VA LE N T IN E A V E
BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL
SKILESLNBRIAR
BECKMAN AVE
LAMETTI LN
MCCRAC
KE
N L
N KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN
BUSSARD CT
DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT
CANNONGLENHILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTROY
KATIE CT
G
L
ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE
C
IR
GALE CIRMCCLUNG DR
WY
N
C
R
E
S
T
L
N
SA
N
D
E
E
N
R
D
PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR
NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT
CU
M
M
I
N
G
S
L
N
V
A
L
E
N
T
I
N
E
C
T
INGERS
O
N
C
T
COLLEEN
CT
GL
E
N
V
I
E
W
CT
HUN
T
E
R
S
CT
SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE
THOM CT AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI
N
D
I
A
N
P
L
EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING
AVE
NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NGLENHILL RD
WYN
R
I
D
G
E
PLEASANT CIR
ARDEN
INDIAN OAKS CT
JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT
VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN
BRIARKNOLL CIR
DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIRPRIOR AVEINDIAN OAKS CIR
CH
A
T
H
A
M
CIR
L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNKATIELN
COUNTY ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR
LAKE LN
COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A BLVD
GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN
EW
B
R
I
G
H
TO
N
R
DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W
COUNTY ROAD E
2
WLAKEVIEWCT
C H A TH A M A V E
SIEMS CTARDEN PL
GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELL
ING
ARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NBETHEL DROLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTI
N
E
R
DINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOL
D
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
1
0
LAKE
S
H
O
R
E
P
L
INTERSTATE 694
INTERSTAT
E
6
9
4
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
1
0
COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W
ABELE ST (Private)TODD DR (Private)TODD DR (Private)
PRIOR
AV
E
N
(
P
r
i
vate)LISA LN (Private)LIS
A
C
T
(Pri
v
a
t
e
)PRIOR CT(Private)TODD DR
(P
r
iva
te
)PRIOR AVE N(Private)LEXINGTON AVE NKNOL
L
D
R VISTA CTDAWN CIR E
COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI
EW
DR
COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR
AM
B
L
E
D
R
COUNTY ROAD 96 W
LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private)
B
E
T
H
E
L
D
R
BETH
E
L
D
R
COUNTY ROAD E W
LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE
INGERSON RD
AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR
AL HILLS DRTony SchmidtRegional Park
Crepeau NaturePreserve
HazelnutPark
IngersonPark
FreewayPark
Tony SchmidtRegional Park
SampsonPark
Lindey's Park
CharlesPerry Park
Tony SchmidtRegional Park
ValentinePark
FloralPark
Royal HillsPark CummingsPark
Arden ManorPark
JohannaMarsh
Arden OaksPark
CommunityGardens
Lake Josephine
Lake Johanna
ValentineLake
RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake
Pavement Management 0 1,000Feet
Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Engineering\CIP\Maps\CIP maps\Pavement projects.mxd2015-20192020202120222023
202520262027
2024
2028
58
Page 1 of 2
DATE: July 20, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Environmental Investigation for Snelling Avenue North
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources:
$4,000,000 TBD PIR, City Utility Funds, Assessments
(2020 – 2024 CIP
with proposed round-a-bout) Council Should Consider
The City Council direction is requested regarding the results of the environmental investigation for
the Snelling Avenue North project.
Background
The City’s Capital Improvement Program includes potential roadway and utility improvements along
Snelling Avenue North extending from County Road E to Highway 51. The City initiated a
feasibility study for the project in late 2019. During the geotechnical investigation process for the
feasibility study, the soil boring company reported “Apparent Hydrocarbon Odors” at 11 of the 15
soil boring locations.
In response to this information, the City hired WSB to conduct an environmental investigation to
assist with identification of potential contaminants within the project. The scope of work for the
environmental investigation included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and field
investigation to evaluate the current subsurface soil, groundwater and soil vapor conditions along the
project corridor. A copy of the Phase I ESA is provided in Attachment B. A copy of the Field
Investigation Report is provided in Attachment C.
Attachment A provides a figure summarizing the results of the field investigation and indicating
locations where analytical test results exceeding Tier 1, Tier 2 and other state guidelines.
Ryan Spencer with WSB is scheduled to participate in the work session on July 20 to further explain
the testing results, state guidelines, and answer questions. Mr. Spencer can also discuss his
AGENDA ITEM – 1D
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
recommendation to prepare a Response Action Plan and a Construction Contingency Plan for the
project to assist in managing contaminated soils.
Council Direction
Staff is seeking confirmation from the City Council that staff should proceed with negotiating a
professional services agreement with WSB to prepare a Response Action Plan and a Construction
Contingency Plan for the proposed project.
Staff is also seeking direction if the City Council wishes to continue considering construction of a
new trail to the south of County Road E as part of the proposed Snelling Avenue North project based
on future trail priorities north of County Road E and available funding from the City’s PIR fund. The
City Council had previously guided staff to focus on new trail segments north of County Road E
during preparation of the current Regional Solicitation grant applications. This issue does not need to
be resolved now, but any direction would assist in developing the scope of work for the consultant.
Budget Impact
The estimated costs for potential improvements to Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to
Highway 51 have been estimated under three design alternatives. The following information does
not include potential improvements to the intersection at County Road E or additional
environmental costs for managing contaminated soil.
Alternative 1 includes the full reconstruction of the roadway along with the addition of an 8-ft
to 10-ft wide trail adjacent to the west side of the road and water, sanitary sewer and storm
sewer improvements.
Alternative 2 includes full reconstruction of the roadway and water main, sanitary sewer and
drainage improvements, but no addition of a pedestrian trail.
Alternative 3 is limited to reclamation of existing pavement and repaving the roadway to the
existing width, with limited utility improvements and no addition of a pedestrian trail.
The estimated cost for the three alternatives is provided below.
IMPROVEMENTS
ALTERNATIVE
No. 1
ALTERNATIVE
No. 2
ALTERNATIVE
No. 3
ROADWAY $ 2,025,000 $ 1,520,000 $ 900,000
WATER MAIN $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 25,000
SANITARY SEWER $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 20,000
STORMWATER DRAINAGE $ 980,000 $ 375,000 $ 20,000
TOTAL $ 3,630,000 $ 2,520,000 $ 965,000
Attachments
Attachment A: Analytical Exceedances Map
Attachment B: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
Attachment C: Phase II Field Investigation
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE ASSESSMENT
OLD SNELLING AVENUE & COUNTY ROAD E
IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY ROAD E TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 51 | ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112
REVISED MARCH 2, 2020
Prepared for:
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
WSB PROJECT NO. 015447-000
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Title Page
OLD SNELLING AVENUE & COUNTY ROAD E IMPROVEMENTS
For:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
REVISED MARCH 2, 2020
Prepared by:
CERTIFICATION
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Certification
The report was prepared by:
_____________________________________________________________
BEN FEHR
Date: March 2, 2020 Title: Environmental Scientist
The report was reviewed by:
_____________________________________________________________
RYAN SPENCER, CHMM
Date: March 2, 2020 Title: Senior Environmental Scientist
TABLE OF CONENTS
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Table of Contents
TITLE PAGE
CERTIFICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Assessment Limitations and Assumptions ......................................................................... 3
2.4 Special Terms and Conditions ............................................................................................ 3
2.5 Previous Environmental Documents ................................................................................... 4
3. Site Description ................................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Project Corridor Location .................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Vicinity and Characteristics ................................................................................................. 6
3.3 Current and Historic Use of the Project Corridor ................................................................ 6
3.4 Description of Structures, Roads, and Improvements ........................................................ 6
3.5 Adjacent Sites ..................................................................................................................... 6
4. User and Owner Provided Information ............................................................................................. 7
5. Records Review ............................................................................................................................... 8
5.1 Regulatory Database Review ............................................................................................. 8
5.2 Regulatory File Review ..................................................................................................... 10
5.3 Physical Setting Information ............................................................................................. 11
5.4 Historical Use Information ................................................................................................. 12
6. Site Reconnaissance ..................................................................................................................... 14
6.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 14
6.2 General Site Setting .......................................................................................................... 14
6.3 Interior and Exterior Observations .................................................................................... 14
7. Interviews ....................................................................................................................................... 16
8. Findings and Opinions ................................................................................................................... 17
8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions ............................................................................. 17
8.2 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions ............................................................. 17
8.3 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions ........................................................... 17
8.4 Vapor Intrusion .................................................................................................................. 18
8.5 De Minimis Conditions ...................................................................................................... 18
8.6 Items of Environmental Note ............................................................................................. 18
9. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 19
10. Data Gaps ...................................................................................................................................... 20
11. Qualifications of Environmental Professionals ............................................................................... 21
TABLE OF CONENTS
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Table of Contents
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Project Corridor Location
Figure 2 – Project Corridor Details
Figure 3 – REC Map
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Photographic Documentation
Appendix B – User Questionnaire
Appendix C – ERIS Database Report
Appendix D – Physical Setting Report
Appendix E – Fire Insurance Maps
Appendix F – City Directories
Appendix G – Aerial Photographs
Appendix H – Topographic Maps
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 1
1. Summary
WSB was retained by the City of Arden Hills (City) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) for the proposed Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements project located in Arden
Hills, Minnesota (the Project Corridor). The objective of the assessment was to identify Recognized
Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Project Corridor according to ASTM E1527-13
“Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments”.
The Project Corridor is a north-south segment of Old Snelling Avenue in Arden Hills, Ramsey County,
Minnesota. The Project Corridor is approximately 0.8 miles long, extending from north of County Road E
(approximately Arden Oaks Drive) at the north end to Trunk Highway (TH) 51 at the south end, including
a proposed roundabout intersection at County Road E. The Project Corridor is in the western half of
Section 34, Township 30N, Range 23W and in the southwest corner of Section 27, Township 30N, Range
23W. Land use surrounding the Project Corridor consists primarily of single-family dwellings with a
commercial building at the north end. A Project Corridor Location map and a Project Corridor Details map
are included as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.
WSB has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice
E1527-13. Exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this assessment.
This Phase I ESA has been prepared exclusively for the City. No additional parties may rely on the
contents of this report unless written authorization is obtained from WSB.
This Phase I ESA has identified two (2) RECs, no historical recognized environmental conditions
(HRECs), and no controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) in connection with the Project
Corridor (see Figure 3). The following RECs were identified:
REC-1: Contaminated Soils Encountered During Bridge Replacement
Contaminated soil was encountered in 2018 during the replacement of Bridge 62J17 located on the
southern portion of the Project Corridor. Soil samples collected from three stockpiles generated during
construction identified benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent concentrations above the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) Screening Soil Leaching Value (SLV) and diesel range organics (DRO) above
the MPCA’s criteria for unregulated fill. Based on the analytical results, a total of 486 cubic yards of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)- and DRO-impacted soil was removed during bridge construction
and disposed offsite at a certified landfill. It is possible that contaminated soil remains in this area. The
former and/or current presence of PAH- and DRO- impacted soil in the vicinity of Bridge 62J17 is
considered a REC.
REC-2: Petroleum Odor Noted During Geotechnical Investigation
At total of 15 geotechnical soil borings were advanced along the Project Corridor in 2019 in preparation
for roadway improvements. The borings were advanced to 14.5 feet below grade and approximately
every 400 linear feet along the Project Corridor. While completing the borings, an “apparent hydrocarbon
odor” was noted in 11 of the 15 boring locations at depths ranging from 0.3 to 14.5 feet below grade. No
analytical soil samples were collected during the geotechnical investigation. The presence of petroleum
odors noted throughout the Project Corridor during the 2019 Geotechnical Investigation is considered a
REC.
Additionally, the following items of environmental note were identified:
Spill Listings
Multiple Spills and Historical Spills incidents were listed at the Project Corridor and/or at sites located
adjacent to the Project Corridor. The reported spills were surficial in nature and did not impact soil or
groundwater. All reported Spills / Historical Spills listings have been issued closure by the MPCA. It is
possible that documented and/or undocumented spills may be encountered during roadway
improvements.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 2
Fuel Oil Tanks
The adjacent residential sites along the Project Corridor may contain fuel oil underground storage tanks
(USTs) used for heating purposes. Typical fuel oil USTs are less than 1,000-gallons in size and not
registered with the MPCA. It is possible that undocumented fuel oil leaks may be encountered during
roadway improvements.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 3
2. Introduction
2.1 Purpose
WSB was retained by the City of Arden Hills (City) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) for the proposed Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements project
located in Arden Hills, Minnesota (the Project Corridor). The objective of the assessment was to
identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Project Corridor
according to ASTM E1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessments”.
The ASTM E1527-13 Standard defines the term recognized environmental condition as meaning
“the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at
a Project Corridor: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a
release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release
to the environment.” The term is not intended to include de minimis condition’s that generally do
not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the
subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.
Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions.
WSB understands that the City intends to utilize this assessment to determine the extent of
potential soil and/or groundwater contamination prior to proceeding with design of street and
utility improvements at the Project Corridor. Proposed street and/or utility improvements include
roadway reconstruction, a single lane roundabout, multiple-use trail, and storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, and water main replacements. It is understood that the work is planned during the 2022
construction season.
2.2 Scope of Services
The Scope of Services performed by WSB is defined by the ASTM E1527-13 Standard and the
methodologies and procedures described in the body of this report. The ASTM E1527-13
Standard is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent
landowner, contiguous Project Corridor owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations of
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability,
which is the practice that constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into previous ownership and uses of
the Project Corridor with good commercial or customary practice” as defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601
(35) (B).
2.3 Assessment Limitations and Assumptions
This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments. Snow was present during the site visit which limited direct
ground observation. No conditions were encountered that were determined to be significantly
limiting to the purpose of this assessment.
The Scope of Services for this Phase I ESA did not include the completion of soil borings, the
installation of groundwater monitoring wells, or the collection of soil, sediment, surface water,
groundwater, or soil vapor samples. In addition, this assessment did not include collection or
analysis of samples for the presence of asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), lead-based
paint, lead in drinking water, radon, or urea formaldehyde as this is beyond the scope of the
ASTM E1527-13.
2.4 Special Terms and Conditions
The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on the general guidance
provided by ASTM E1527-13, available data cited in this report, and Project Corridor conditions
noted at the time of the site reconnaissance. A Phase I ESA cannot wholly eliminate the
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 4
uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs at the Project Corridor. This assessment is intended
to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty related to the potential for RECs in connection with the
Project Corridor within reasonable time limits and cost. The conclusions and recommendations
contained in this report represent WSB’s professional opinions. These opinions are arrived at in
accordance with currently acceptable Phase I ESA practices at this time and are subject to the
inherent limitations of environmental assessments outlined in this section.
WSB obtained, reviewed, and evaluated information provided by Project Corridor
owners/representatives, Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. (ERIS) historical site
reports and other local/state public entities. WSB’s conclusions, opinions, and recommendations
are based in part on this information. WSB’s services did not include the verification of the
accuracy or authenticity of this information as this is beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA per
ASTM guidelines.
This report is based upon the standard gathered information (ASTM E1527-13) and WSB’s
observations made during the site reconnaissance. Given the inherent limitations of
environmental assessment work, WSB does not guarantee that the Project Corridor is free of
hazardous or potentially hazardous materials or conditions, or that latent or undiscovered
conditions will not become evident in the future. WSB’s report is prepared in accordance with
WSB’s Scope of Work and no other warranties, representations, or certifications are made.
2.5 Previous Environmental Documents
The following previous environmental documents were provided to WSB and reviewed as part of
this assessment:
· Contaminated Soil Encountered During Old Snelling Avenue Bridge 62J17 Replacement,
email correspondence and laboratory analytical reports dated between November-
December 2018, by multiple consultants (2018 Bridge 62J17 Replacement);
· Geotechnical Boring Logs, Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements, dated October
3-4, 2019, by Northern Technologies, LLC (NTI) (2019 Geotechnical Borings); and
· Memorandum, Information Pertaining to Spills, Tanks, Response Calls, or Other
Environmental Concerns, Snelling Avenue North, Arden Hills, dated February 10, 2020,
by the City of Arden Hills (2020 Memo);
Copies of the previous environmental documents are available from WSB by request. The
following is a summary of the previous environmental reports:
2018 Bridge 62J17 Replacement
Bridge 62J17 is located at the southern end of the Project Corridor approximately 240 feet
northwest of the intersection of Old Snelling Avenue and TH-51. The City of Arden Hills replaced
the bridge in 2018. On November 20, 2018, three soil samples were collected from three
separate stockpiles generated during construction. Soil samples SP-1, SP-2, and SP-3 were
collected from Stockpiles A, B, and C, respectively. The samples were submitted for laboratory
analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals, and diesel range organics (DRO).
The following is a summary of the laboratory analytical results:
· No detections of RCRA Metals or VOCs exceeded regulatory criteria.
· Multiple PAH compounds were detected in the stockpile samples above laboratory
reporting limits. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)-Equivalent concentrations of 1.6 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) were identified in stockpile samples SP-1 and SP-2, exceeding the
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 5
MPCA’s Screening Soil Leaching Value (SLV) of 1.4 mg/kg. Concentrations of PAHs and
the corresponding BaP Equivalent were identified above the laboratory reporting limits in
sample SP-3 but below MPCA regulatory criteria.
· DRO was detected at a concentration of 103 mg/kg in stockpile sample SP-1, exceeding
the MPCA unregulated fill criteria for DRO of 100 mg/kg. DRO was identified at
concentrations of 66 mg/kg and 9.4 mg/kg in samples SP-2 and SP-3, respectively,
below the regulatory standard.
Landfill disposal of the soil from Stockpiles A and B was required based on BaP Equivalent
and/or DRO concentrations detected above the MPCA’s criteria for unregulated fill. A total of 486
cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed offsite during the bridge replacement project. Soil
from the third stockpile (Stockpile C) met the MPCA’s criteria of unregulated fill and as a result,
did not require disposal at a landfill.
2019 Geotechnical Borings
In preparation for the roadway improvements project, 15 geotechnical soil borings (B-1 through B-
15) were completed throughout the Project Corridor in October 2019. The borings were
advanced to 14.5 feet below grade and were advanced approximately every 400 linear feet.
While completing the borings, an “apparent hydrocarbon odor” was noted at varying depths in 11
of the 15 boring locations. The hydrocarbon odor was reported at locations throughout the
Project Corridor at various depths ranging from 0.3 to 14.5 feet below grade. No analytical soil
samples were collected during the geotechnical investigation. Groundwater was encountered at
14 feet below grade at boring B-1, located at the south end of the Project Corridor near Bridge
62J17, and at boring B-12, located at the north end of the Project Corridor at County Road E.
Groundwater was not encountered in the other borings.
2020 Memo
Todd Blomstrom, the City of Arden Hills Public Works Director and City Engineer, prepared a
memo in response to WSB’s request for historical material spills, tanks, response calls, or
hazardous material releases at the Project Corridor or adjacent sites. City staff had no
recollection of any spills or releases at the Project Corridor. The following additional information
was provided in the 2020 Memo:
· According to water main record plans dated 1968 and 1969, an 8-inch high pressure
natural gas pipeline historically extended along the east side of Old Snelling Avenue from
TH-51 to County Road E. This pipeline was believed to have been replaced in 2018.
· An abandoned petroleum pipeline was discovered along Round Lake Road south of
Ramsey County Road 96 several years ago. Based on the information provided, the
pipeline was located approximately two miles northwest of the Project Corridor and is not
assumed to be located at or adjacent to the Project Corridor.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 6
3. Site Description
3.1 Project Corridor Location
The Project Corridor is a north-south segment of Old Snelling Avenue in Arden Hills, Ramsey
County, Minnesota. The Project Corridor is approximately 0.8 miles long, extending from north of
County Road E (approximately Arden Oaks Drive) at the north end to Trunk Highway (TH)-51 at
the south end, including a proposed roundabout intersection at County Road E. The Project
Corridor is in the western half of Section 34, Township 30N, Range 23W and in the southwest
corner of Section 27, Township 30N, Range 23W. A Project Corridor Location map and a Project
Corridor Details map are included as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.
3.2 Vicinity and Characteristics
The adjacent sites and area surrounding the Project Corridor consists primarily of single-family
residential dwellings. One commercial building is located adjacent to the north end of the Project
Corridor. Lakes Johanna and Josephine are located between approximately 615 feet and 1,230
feet west and 815 feet southeast of the Project Corridor, respectively. The Project Corridor
slopes gradually to the south toward the two surrounding lakes. Multiple ponds are located east
and west of the Project Corridor.
3.3 Current and Historic Use of the Project Corridor
The Project Corridor and adjacent sites were undeveloped as early as 1902. The Project
Corridor was developed between 1912 and 1940 as a paved roadway (Old Snelling Avenue) and
has remained unchanged since at least 1940. The adjacent sites were developed with single-
family residences starting in 1947 and developed over time until approximately 1991. The Project
Corridor and adjacent sites have remained largely unchanged since the early 1990s. A
photographic log of current Project Corridor conditions is included as Appendix A.
3.4 Description of Structures, Roads, and Improvements
The Project Corridor is an asphalt paved roadway. General improvements associated with the
Project Corridor include traffic signage, street lighting, and aboveground / underground utilities. A
City bridge (Bridge 62J17) is located at the south end of the Project Corridor. The Project Corridor
can be accessed from County Road E to the north, TH-51 to the south, or from any of the
additional cross streets and driveways located throughout the Project Corridor.
3.5 Adjacent Sites
Adjacent site use was noted on February 20, 2020 by WSB during the site reconnaissance, and
is described below:
North: Single-family residential dwellings
East: Single-family residential dwellings. A commercial site (Lindey’s Prime Steak House)
and a City park (Lindey’s Park) are located at the northeast and southeast
quadrants, respectively, of Old Snelling Ave and County Rd E.
South: TH-51 followed by single-family residential dwellings.
West: Single-family residential dwellings
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 7
4. User and Owner Provided Information
To satisfy the requirements of All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI), the report user (also the owner in this case)
was provided a user environmental questionnaire. The user is the party seeking to use the Phase I ESA
and has specific obligations under ASTM E1527-13. WSB provided a questionnaire to Todd Blomstrom,
City of Arden Hills Public Works Director / City Engineer for the purposes of satisfying the ASTM and AAI
requirements.
A completed user questionnaire was received from Mr. Blomstrom on February 19, 2020. Mr. Blomstrom
indicated knowledge of RECs related to the Project Corridor associated with the soil contamination
encountered during the replacement of Bridge 62J17 and the “apparent hydrocarbon odor” noted in
recent geotechnical borings (see Section 2.5). Mr. Blomstrom was not aware of any pending/past
litigation, administrative proceedings, or violations relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum
products associated with the Project Corridor. In addition, Mr. Blomstrom was not aware of any
environmental liens or activity use limitations, permits, USTs, or aboveground storage tanks (ASTs)
associated with the Project Corridor. A copy of the completed user questionnaire is included as
Appendix B.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 8
5. Records Review
5.1 Regulatory Database Review
A Federal and State database records review was conducted by ERIS, a commercial regulatory
database service provider. An ERIS Database Report was generated for the Project Corridor on
February 11, 2020. This report was used to identify known spills, leaks or releases and storage
of hazardous substances and petroleum products at the Project Corridor, adjacent sites, and
surrounding area. A copy of the ERIS report is included as Appendix C.
The Federal and State regulatory agency databases were reviewed based on minimum search
distances consistent with the ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice. The ERIS Report includes
descriptions of the databases examined and radius maps showing the locations of the sites
identified.
Project Corridor Listings
The Project Corridor was determined to be associated with five (5) database listings. The listings
are associated with three (3) sites at the Project Corridor. Details related to the database listings
are included in Appendix C. The following Project Corridor listings were identified:
Site 8 – Arden Hills Force Main, Lake Johanna Blvd and County Rd E
· Historical Spills (HIST SPL) – 1 listing
o Unknown quantity of sewage/wastewater was released from a broken sewer
pipe. Reported and closed on 10/12/2000.
Site 11 – Xcel Energy, 3265 Snelling Ave N
· HIST SPL – 1 listing
o Approximately one gallon of mineral oil released on the side of a transformer due
to thunderstorms. Transformer was replaced immediately. Spill reported and
closed on 7/19/2010.
· SPILLS – 1 listing
o Same information included under the HIST SPL listing above.
Site 13 – First Student Bus Accident / First Student-Arden Hills, 3260 Snelling Ave N
· HIST SPL – 1 listing
o Bus rollover crash resulting in the release of 12 gallons of engine oil and anti-
freeze. No diesel was released. Spill reported and closed on 4/5/2004.
· SPILLS – 1 listing
o Same information included in the HIST SPL listing above.
No Property listings were determined to be RECs.
Adjacent Site Listings
Eight (8) listings were determined to be for sites located immediately adjacent to the Project
Corridor. The listings are associated with four (4) sites. The following adjacent site listings were
identified:
Site 1 – Polansky Trucking, 3434 Snelling Ave N
· Unpermitted Dump (UNPERMITTED LF) – 1 listing
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 9
o Site Assessment investigation (SA0008404). Notification on 1/1/1987 and site
closure issued on 8/19/1998.
· MPCA Agency Interests (AI) – 1 listing
· Facility Registry Service/Facility Index (FINDS/FRS) – 1 listing
· SITE ASSESSMENT – 1 listing
o Same information included under the UNPERMITTED LF listing above.
Site 2 – 2009 Pavement Management Program, Address Unknown, Arden Hills, MN
· MPCA AI – 1 listing
Sites 6, 9 – Midwest Brass & Aluminum Foundry Waste, No Address, Arden Hills, MN
· MPCA – 1 listing
· UNPERMITTED LF – 1 listing
o Site Assessment investigation (SA0008406). Notification on 1/1/1987 and site
closure issued on 8/17/1998.
· SITE ASSESSMENT – 1 listing
o Same information included under the UNPERMITTED LF listing above.
No adjacent site listings were determined to be RECs.
Surrounding Area Listings
Fifty-three (53) database listings were determined to be for sites located in the surrounding area
of the Project Corridor (beyond adjacent). The listings are associated with 29 sites. Based on the
available information, no surrounding area listings were determined to be RECs. Due to the
proximity to the Project Corridor (250 feet to the east), the following information is provided for
Site 3 but does not represent a REC:
Site 3 – Bill Floren / Floren Residence, 1434 Arden Place
· HIST SPL – 1 listing
o Contractor discovered a fuel oil smell while capping a well. Associated with Leak
Site LS0012785. Spill reported on 7/15/1999 and closed on 6/30/2000.
· Historical Leak Sites (HIST LEAKSITES) – 1 listing
o LS0012785. Reported as fuel oil #1 and #2 on 7/14/1999 and closed on
9/23/1999. No groundwater contamination noted.
· MPCA AI – 1 listing
· MPCA Remediation Leak Sites (LST REM SITE) – 1 listing
o Closed leak. Same information included under the HIST LEAKSITES listing
above.
· SPILLS – 1 listing
o Same information included under the HIST SPL listing above.
No surrounding area listings were determined to be RECs.
Unplottable
The ERIS report identified 38 database listings as “unplottable.” These are sites which ERIS
could not map due to various reasons, including incomplete or limited geographic information.
Based on distance from the Project Corridor and/or type of listing, none of the unplottable listings
were determined to be RECs.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 10
5.2 Regulatory File Review
ASTM Standard E1527-13 requires that a regulatory file review be conducted if the Project
Corridor or adjacent sites are listed in a leak or spills database or other known databases
indicating contamination. Based on information included in the ERIS Database Report (see
Section 5.1 and the MPCA’s What’s in my Neighborhood (WIMN) database, three (3) regulatory
file reviews were ordered for this assessment. The file reviews were associated with two
adjacent sites and one site located within 250 feet of the Project Corridor. Copies of the files are
available from WSB by request. The following file review information is provided:
Project Corridor File Reviews
No Project Corridor file reviews were required for this assessment.
Adjacent Site File Reviews
Site Assessment SA0008404 – Polansky Trucking, 3434 Snelling Ave N
Site Assessment SA0008406 – Midwest Brass & Aluminum Foundry Waste, No address
No files were located by the MPCA for Site Assessment sites SA0008404 and SA0008406. Per
the MPCA WIMN database, the SA0008404 listing was opened by the MPCA on January 1, 1987
and closed on August 19, 1998. The SA008406 listing was opened by the MPCA on January 1,
1987 and closed on August 17, 1998. Based on the closed/inactive status, type of listing, and
lack of follow-up cleanup actions, the adjacent site assessment listings do not represent RECs in
connection to the Project Corridor.
Site Assessment sites are places where contamination or regulated waste activities have been
reported to the MPCA. These sites are assessed to determine if there is a potential for human
health or the environment to be exposed to hazardous substances. If it is determined that there
is a potential for exposure, the site is referred to a cleanup program (e.g. Superfund or
Petroleum). If it is determined that little or no exposure potential exists and no further remedial
actions are planned, the site is closed and listed as inactive.
Surrounding Area File Reviews
Leak Site LS0012785 – Floren Residence, 1434 Arden Place
Based on proximity (approximately 250 feet east) and upgradient location relative to the Project
Corridor, a regulatory file review was ordered for MPCA Leak site LS0012785. The leak was
discovered on July 16, 1999 when a well contractor was abandoning a site well and discovered
fuel oil floating on the water table in the casing of the well. The fuel oil had seeped through a
crack in the well casing. The source of the release was a 1,000-gallon fuel oil tank. An
Excavation Report Worksheet was completed following the fuel oil tank removal on July 19, 1999.
Approximately three cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed offsite. The depth to static
groundwater was measured at 84 feet below grade during abandonment of the site well. Shallow
groundwater was not encountered during the tank removal.
A Limited Site Investigation (LSI) was completed at the site on September 10, 1999. Seven (7)
total borings were advanced at the site in August 1999. Groundwater was not encountered
during the investigation. DRO concentrations were detected between 50 and 1,600 mg/kg within
the former tank basin at depths ranging between 21 and 28 feet below grade. The vertical extent
of contamination did not exceed a depth of 30 feet below grade. The horizontal extent of
contamination was contained in an area localized around the former tank basin below the site
basement. No soil contamination was observed beyond the tank basin. According to the LSI,
approximately 54 feet separated the impacted soil from the groundwater table at the site. Due to
clayey soils encountered during the investigation, the fuel oil contamination was expected to
resist vertical and horizontal movement. The site was issued closure on September 23, 1999.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 11
Based on the lack of contamination identified beyond the former fuel oil tank basin, Leak Site
LS0012785 is not considered a REC.
5.3 Physical Setting Information
ERIS provided a Physical Setting Report that details topographic, hydrologic, geologic, soil, wells
and radon information for the Project Corridor. A copy of the ERIS Physical Setting Report is
included as Appendix D. The following information was obtained through review of the report:
· The Project Corridor elevation ranges from approximately 920 feet at the north end to
885 feet at the south end. The Project Corridor slopes gradually to the south towards
Lakes Johanna and Josephine.
· No wetland features were depicted at the Project Corridor. Multiple wetland features
were illustrated adjacent to the Project corridor including freshwater ponds, freshwater
emergent wetlands, and freshwater forested/shrub wetlands. Lakes Josephine and
Johanna are located between approximately 615 feet and 1,230 feet west and 815 feet
southeast of the Project Corridor, respectively.
· Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone data was available for the
Project Corridor. The south end of the Project Corridor, where Old Snelling Avenue
crosses over the creek connecting Lakes Johanna and Josephine, is classified as Flood
Zone AE-11. Zone AE-11 is considered an area that has a 1% probability of flooding
every year. The remainder of the Project Corridor is classified a Zone X-12, an area of
minimal flood hazard.
· The underlying bedrock geology at the Project Corridor consists of sandstone and
limestone. The bedrock geology is reported as Middle Ordovician rocks, undivided-
Decorah Shale; limestone of the Platteville Formation; shaly rocks of the Glenwood
Formation; and St. Peter Sandstone in the Hollandale embayment of southeastern
Minnesota. Based on information included in adjacent and surrounding well logs, the
estimated depth to bedrock is greater than 120 feet below grade.
· The surficial soil at the Project Corridor is primarily reported as urban land-Hayden-
Kingsley complex. The Hayden-Kingsley complex consists of fine sandy loam, clay loam,
and/or sandy loam.
· No water wells are depicted at the Project Corridor. Multiple domestic water wells are
depicted at adjacent sites. Based on information obtained from the well logs included in
the Physical Setting Report, the estimated depth of static groundwater level at the Project
Corridor ranges from 45 feet below grade at the south end to 95 feet below grade at the
north end. Shallow groundwater was encountered at 14 feet below grade at two boring
locations advanced during the 2019 Geotechnical Investigation (see Section 2.5).
· Based on information obtained from the Physical Setting Report and the Minnesota
Geologic Atlas for Ramsey County, groundwater is anticipated to flow southwest at the
Project Corridor. It should be noted that groundwater flow can be subject to localized
variation due to factors including geology, topography, soil type, drawdown from local
wells, etc.
· The Project Corridor is in Ramsey County which is classified as EPA Radon Zone 1.
Counites in Zone 1 have predicted average indoor radon screening values greater than 4
picocuries per liter (pCi/L).
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 12
5.4 Historical Use Information
WSB reviewed historical information to determine if past uses would indicate RECs at the Project
Corridor. WSB consulted historical sources that were readily available, practically reviewable, and
likely to be useful to determine the history of the Project Corridor within the timeframe and
constraints of this Phase I ESA. The sources consulted included the following:
· Fire Insurance Maps: Sanborn fire insurance maps for the Project Corridor were
requested from ERIS. Often, areas of potential environmental concern, such as locations
of former storage tanks or hazardous substance storage, can be identified by referencing
historical fire insurance maps. No map information was found for the Project Corridor or
adjacent sites. A copy of the Fire Insurance Map Report is included as Appendix E.
· City Directories: ERIS provided city directories for the following Project Corridor and/or
cross streets for the years 1961-2017: Arden Place, Bussard Court, County Road E,
Cummings Lane, Forest Lane, Glenarden Road, Lake Johanna Boulevard, Lametti Lane,
Oak Avenue, Ridgewood Road, Skiles Lane, and Snelling Avenue North (see Appendix
F). The city directories primarily identified single-family residential properties throughout
for the adjacent sites. The adjacent commercial site located at 3600/3610 Snelling
Avenue North has been listed as Lindey’s Prime Steak House and/or Lidney’s Liquors
since at least 1961. No listings of environmental significance for the Project Corridor or
adjacent sites were identified during the review of the city directories.
· Aerial Photographs: ERIS provided historical aerial photographs of the Project Corridor
and surrounding area dating back to 1940. Aerial photographs were reviewed for the
years 1940, 1947, 1953, 1957, 1966, 1972, 1984, 1991, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010,
2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 (see Appendix G). Due to the scale and quality of some of
the photographs, it is difficult to determine activities/specific land use that may have
occurred at the Project Corridor and adjacent sites.
Project Corridor Observations
The Project Corridor (configuration of Old Snelling Avenue) has remained unchanged
since at least 1940.
Adjacent Site Observations
The adjacent sites were primarily undeveloped wooded and/or grassland in 1940. Cross
streets located adjacent to the northern half of the Project Corridor are first visible on the
1947 photograph, with houses developed along the adjacent cross streets over time from
approximately 1953 to 1966. Development of cross streets and residential dwellings
located adjacent to the southern half of the Project Corridor occurred over time from
approximately 1957 to 1991.
The commercial building located at the northeast quadrant of County Road E and Old
Snelling Avenue has remained unchanged since at least 1940. Dating back to 1940, the
current City park located at the southeast quadrant of County Road E and Old Snelling
Avenue has never been developed. The adjacent sites have remained largely unchanged
since at least 1991.
· Topographic Maps: ERIS provided historical USGS topographic maps for the Project
Corridor and surrounding area dating back to 1902. Topographic maps were reviewed for
the years 1902, 1952, 1958, 1967, 1972, 1980, 1993, 1997, and 2016 (see Appendix H).
Project Corridor Map Observations
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 13
The Project Corridor was not yet developed on the 1902 map. The Project Corridor has
remained a north-south section of Old Snelling Avenue since at least 1952.
Adjacent Site Map Observations
The adjacent sites are depicted as undeveloped on the 1902 map. The adjacent
residential sites and cross streets along the northern half of the Project Corridor are
shown as developed on the 1952 and subsequent maps. Undeveloped wetlands are
located adjacent to the southern portion of the Project Corridor on the 1952 to 1980
maps, until residential development is visible on the 1993 map.
· City Building and Inspection File Review: No information indicating the removal of
former buildings or structures at the Project Corridor was identified. Therefore, WSB did
not request City or County inspection records as part of this assessment.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 14
6. Site Reconnaissance
6.1 Methodology
WSB conducted a site walkthrough and reconnaissance of the Project Corridor, adjacent sites
and surrounding area on February 20, 2020. The site walkthrough included accessing all areas
of the Project Corridor for visual observation. A roadside assessment, limited to the public right-
of-way, was conducted for adjacent sites and the surrounding area.
6.2 General Site Setting
The Project Corridor is in a primarily residential area situated between Lake Johanna and Lake
Josephine in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The adjacent sites and area surrounding the Project
Corridor consists of single-family residential properties with a commercial site located at the north
end. The Project Corridor gradually slopes to the south. The Project Corridor can be accessed
from County Road E to the north, TH-51 to the south, or from any of the additional cross streets
and driveways located adjacent the Project Corridor.
6.3 Interior and Exterior Observations
WSB conducted observations of the Project Corridor, adjacent sites, and surrounding area on
February 20, 2020. Site reconnaissance photographs are included in Appendix A. A summary
of the site reconnaissance is outlined in the table below:
Site Reconnaissance Summary Table
Issue
Observed
During Site
Visit
Comments
Yes No
Aboveground / Underground
Storage Tanks X None observed.
Drums/Containers X None observed.
Animals X None observed.
Buildings/Structures X
Residential dwellings and a commercial
building were observed at the adjacent
sites.
Construction/Demolition
debris X None observed.
Drainage Ditches/Culverts X
A culvert/bridge (Bridge 62J17) is
located at the south end of the Project
Corridor.
Dirt/Spoil Piles X None observed.
Floor Drains /Sumps/Vaults X None observed.
Hazardous
Substances/Petroleum
Products
X None observed.
Landfills X None observed.
Odors X None observed.
Oil/Water Separators X None observed.
Pipelines or Utilities X
Overhead powerlines are located along
the western boundary of the Project
Corridor. A high-pressure gas main was
observed adjacent to the north end of the
Project Corridor. Underground utilities at
the Project Corridor are assumed.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 15
Issue
Observed
During Site
Visit
Comments
Pits, Ponds, Lagoons X Multiple ponds/wetland areas are located
adjacent to the Project Corridor.
Pools of Liquid X None observed.
Railroad Spurs X None observed.
Septic Systems X None observed.
Solid Waste Disposal X None observed.
Solvents X None observed.
Spills or Releases X None observed.
Stained Soil/Concrete X None observed.
Stressed or Dead Vegetation X None observed.
Transformers X
Multiple pole-mounted transformers are
located along the western boundary of
the Project Corridor. No transformer
leaks or spills were observed.
Unidentified Substances X None observed.
Wastewater Discharge from
Project Corridor X None observed.
Wells X None observed.
Asbestos X None observed.
Lead-Based Paint X None observed.
Mold/Moisture X None observed.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 16
7. Interviews
WSB conducted interviews with individuals who may have knowledge about the Project Corridor
including current or past uses or other information. Specifically, WSB made inquiries regarding
knowledge of existing or former storage tanks, leaks, dumps, spills, drums, mold, clandestine
drug labs, environmental documents, or potential environmental concerns associated with the
Project Corridor. The following individuals were contacted in person or by phone or email:
Interview Summary Table
Resource Title or Organization Results of Interview
Todd Blomstrom
City of Arden Hills Public
Works Director / City
Engineer
Mr. Blomstrom completed a user
questionnaire on February 19, 2020
and indicated knowledge of soil
contamination encountered during the
replacement of Bridge 62J17 and the
“apparent hydrocarbon odor” noted in
recent geotechnical borings as RECs
(see Section 4 and Appendix B).
Mr. Blomstrom prepared a memo
dated February 10, 2020 in response
to WSB’s request for information
pertaining to historical material spills,
tanks, response calls, or hazardous
material releases at the Project
Corridor (see Appendix 2.5). No
information included in the memo
represent RECs.
Kris Rewald Fire Marshal – Lake Johanna
Fire Department
A request for information pertaining to
spills, tanks, response calls, or other
environmental concerns associated
with the Project Corridor was
submitted to the Lake Johanna Fire
Department on February 25, 2020. A
response was received from Mr.
Rewald stating that the only
emergency responses along the
Project Corridor have been for
accidents, fire, and EMS calls in the
adjacent neighborhoods.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 17
8. Findings and Opinions
8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions
The ASTM E1527-13 Standard defines the term recognized environmental condition (REC) as
meaning “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in,
on, or at a Project Corridor: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative
of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future
release to the environment.”
Based on this assessment, two (2) RECs were identified in connection with the Project Corridor
(see Figure 3). The following RECs were identified:
REC-1: Contaminated Soils Encountered During Bridge Replacement
Contaminated soil was encountered in 2018 during the replacement of Bridge 62J17 located on
the southern portion of the Project Corridor. Soil samples collected from three stockpiles
generated during construction identified BaP equivalent concentrations above the MPCA SLV
and DRO above the MPCA’s criteria for unregulated fill. Based on the analytical results, a total of
486 cubic yards of PAH- and DRO-impacted soil was removed during bridge construction and
disposed offsite at a certified landfill. It is possible that contaminated soil remains in this area.
The former and/or current presence of PAH- and DRO- impacted soil in the vicinity of Bridge
62J17 is considered a REC.
REC-2: Petroleum Odor Noted During Geotechnical Investigation
At total of 15 geotechnical soil borings were advanced along the Project Corridor in 2019 in
preparation for roadway improvements. The borings were advanced to 14.5 feet below grade and
approximately every 400 linear feet along the Project Corridor. While completing the borings, an
“apparent hydrocarbon odor” was noted in 11 of the 15 boring locations at depths ranging from
0.3 to 14.5 feet below grade. No analytical soil samples were collected during the geotechnical
investigation. The presence of petroleum odors noted throughout the Project Corridor during the
2019 Geotechnical Investigation is considered a REC.
8.2 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions
The ASTM E1527-13 Standard defines the term historical recognized environmental condition
(HREC) as meaning “a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products that has
occurred in connection with the Project Corridor and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the
applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a
regulatory authority, without subjecting the Project Corridor to any required controls (e.g., Project
Corridor use restrictions, Activity and Use Limitations (AULs), institutional controls, or engineering
controls). Before calling the past release a HREC, the environmental professional (EP) must
determine whether the past release is a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted (e.g., if
there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers this past release to be a
REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the conditions shall be included in the conclusion
section of the report as a REC.”
Based on this assessment, no HRECs were identified in connection with the Project Corridor.
8.3 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions
The ASTM E1527-13 Standard defines the term controlled recognized environmental condition
(CREC) as meaning “a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum
products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (e.g.,
as evidence by the issuance of NFA letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria
established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 18
remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g., Project Corridor use
restrictions, AULs, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A CREC shall be listed in the
Findings Section of the Phase I ESA report, and as a REC in the Conclusions Section of the
report.”
Based on this assessment, no CRECs were identified in connection with the Project Corridor.
8.4 Vapor Intrusion
No vapor intrusion risks were identified on the Project Corridor. No vapor samples were collected
as part of this assessment.
8.5 Business Risks/De Minimis Conditions
The RECs identified in Section 8.1 present potential environmental risks associated with the
Project Corridor. If contaminated is encountered during future Project Corridor improvements,
impacted soil and groundwater will need to be properly managed in accordance with state and
federal regulations.
No business risks or de minimis conditions were identified during this assessment. A de minimis
condition is a condition that does not threaten human health or the environment and generally
would not be subject to enforcement action if brought to the attention of a regulatory agency.
Conditions determined to be de minimis are not RECs.
8.6 Items of Environmental Note
Additionally, the following items of environmental note were identified:
Spill Listings
Multiple Spills and Historical Spills incidents were listed at the Project Corridor and/or at sites
located adjacent to the Project Corridor. The reported spills were surficial in nature and did not
impact soil or groundwater. All reported Spills / Historical Spills listings have been issued closure
by the MPCA. It is possible that documented and/or undocumented spills may be encountered
during roadway improvements.
Fuel Oil Tanks
The adjacent residential sites along the Project Corridor may contain fuel oil USTs used for
heating purposes. Typical fuel oil USTs are less than 1,000-gallons in size and not registered
with the MPCA. It is possible that undocumented fuel oil leaks may be encountered during
roadway improvements.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 19
9. Recommendations
WSB has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice
E1527-13 for the proposed Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements project located in
Arden Hills, Minnesota (the Project Corridor). Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described
in Section 2.3 of this report.
This Phase I ESA has revealed two (2) RECs, no HRECs, and no CRECs associated with the Project
Corridor as described in Section 8.1, Section 8.2, and Section 8.3. Based on the results of this
assessment, the following recommendations are provided:
· Complete a Phase II ESA at the Project Corridor to identify potential contamination associated
with the identified RECs. The Phase II ESA should include the completion of subsurface borings
along the Project Corridor and the collection of soil and groundwater (if encountered) samples for
laboratory analysis. The results of the Phase II ESA will be used for future environmental
planning purposes.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 20
10. Data Gaps
Data gaps are defined as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the standards and
practices despite good faith efforts. Intervals of 5 years or greater between historical data sources are
considered data gaps. Good faith efforts were taken to obtain information about the Project Corridor from
a variety of readily available, practically reviewable, and likely to be useful sources. However, the
following information was not able to be obtained:
· A title, environmental lien, or activity and use limitation search was not performed as part of this
assessment.
· Fire insurance map coverage was not available for the Project Corridor and adjacent sites.
· Intervals of five years or greater between standard historical data sources (aerial photographs,
topographic maps, and city directories) for the years 1903-1939 and 1941-1946 are data gaps for
this assessment.
Please note that the lack of recorded sources listed above is considered a data gap but is not considered
a material limitation for the completion of this Phase I ESA.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 21
11. Qualifications of Environmental Professionals
To the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we have met the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in CFR 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training,
and experience to assess a Project Corridor of the nature, history, and setting. We have developed and
performed all appropriate inquiries in general conformance with acceptable standards and practices in the
industry.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Figures
FIGURES
Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Snelling AveTiller La
I nge rson Rd
Harri e t Ave
M-98
M-333
ArdenPlRidgewoodCtCR-99
La m e t ti L aChatham CtLake Johanna Bl v d
Lake LaAsbu
ryAveCounty E Rd
Fernwood StN Pascal AveS ki l e s L a
Glenar denCtHuntersCt
NDunlapStGlenarden RdIngerso
n
C
t
M ccrackenLaShoreline LaNSnellingAve
Red Fox Rd
Gl e nhil l R d
Bussard Ct
Grey Fox Rd
W Edgewater Ave Cannon Av eHamlineAveN Conn
ellyStCarlton DrForestLaSiemsCtPine Tree DrS h orewoodD r Benton
WayRidgewoodRd
Sandeen
Rd Dunlap StOak Ave
CSAH 7 3
Ar d e n O aksD
r
C h atham A v eProject Corridor
0 1,000Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Corridor Location
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase I ESA\Figure1_PropertyLocation.mxd Date Saved: 2/19/2020 6:27:55 AM1 inch = 1,000 feet
Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Tiller La
In gerson Rd
County E Rd
Arden PlRidgewoodCt
Lametti La
L ake J o h a n n a
B
l v d
LamettiCirN Pascal AveArden Oaks DrS ki l e s La
NSnelli
n
g
A
ve
Glenarde n CtGlenarden RdCummings
La Con nelly St
N
D
unlap St
Bussard Ct
C a nnon Av e
O a k Av e
F o re st La
SiemsCtRidge
woodRdProject Corridor
0 500Feet¯Figure 2 - Project Corridor Details
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase I ESA\Figure2_PropertyDetailOverview.mxd Date Saved: 2/26/2020 8:53:25 AM1 inch = 500 feet
Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Tiller La
In gerson Rd
County E Rd
Arden PlRidgewoodCt
Lametti La
L ake J o h a n n a
B
l v d
LamettiCirN Pascal AveArden Oaks DrS ki l e s La
NSnelli
n
g
A
ve
Glenarde n CtGlenarden RdCummings
La Con nelly St
N
D
unlap St
Bussard Ct
C a nnon Av e
O a k Av e
F o re st La
SiemsCtRidge
woodRdProject Corridor
0 500Feet¯Figure 3 - REC Map
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase I ESA\Figure3_RECOverview.mxd Date Saved: 2/26/2020 10:00:09 AM1 inch = 500 feet
FIELD INVESTIGATION
REPORT
OLD SNELLING AVENUE AND COUNTY
ROAD E IMPROVEMENTS
OLD SNELLING AVENUE, FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY 51 TO 600 FEET
NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD E, ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112
MAY 8, 2020
Prepared for:
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, MN 55112
WSB PROJECT NO. 015447-000
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
Field Investigation Report Title Page
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000
OLD SNELLING AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD E IMPROVEMENTS
For:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
May 8, 2020
Prepared by:
CERTIFICATION
Field Investigation Report Certification
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000
The report was prepared by:
_____________________________________________________________
BEN FEHR
Date: May 8, 2020 Title: Environmental Scientist
The report was reviewed by:
_____________________________________________________________
RYAN SPENCER, CHMM
Date: May 8, 2020 Title: Senior Environmental Scientist
TABLE OF CONENTS
Field Investigation Report Table of Contents
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000
TITLE PAGE
CERTIFICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Previous Investigations ....................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Work ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Work Plan Deviations .......................................................................................................... 4
2. Investigation ..................................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Soil Sampling ...................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Soil Vapor Sampling............................................................................................................ 5
3. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Soil Sample Results ............................................................................................................ 6
3.2 Soil Vapor Results............................................................................................................... 7
4. Discussions and Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 8
5. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 8
6. Limitations ...................................................................................................................................... 10
TABLE OF CONENTS
Field Investigation Report Table of Contents
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Project Corridor Location
Figure 2 – Environmental Boring Locations
Figure 3 – Analytical Exceedances
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 – Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 – Soil Vapor Analytical Results
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Methods and Procedures
Appendix B – Boring Logs
Appendix C – Laboratory Reports
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 1
1. Introduction
WSB was retained by the City of Arden Hills (City) to conduct a Field Investigation for the proposed Old
Snelling Avenue and County Road (CR) E Improvements project located in Arden Hills, Ramsey County,
Minnesota (the Project Corridor). The Project Corridor is a north-south segment totaling approximately
0.90 miles in length. The Project Corridor extends from Trunk Highway (TH) 51 at the south end to
approximately 600 feet north of CR E (approximately Arden Oaks Drive) at the north end. The Project
Corridor also includes a proposed roundabout intersection at CR E. A Project Corridor Location map is
included as Figure 1.
WSB completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the Project Corridor dated February
28, 2020. The Phase I ESA identified two recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with
the Project Corridor. The purpose of the Field Investigation is to: 1.) determine if the identified RECs
have resulted in soil, groundwater, and/or soil vapor impacts at the Project Corridor and 2.) provide data
to support the proper management of excavated material that will be generated during reconstruction.
This Field Investigation has been prepared exclusively for the City. No additional parties can rely on the
information in this report without written permission from WSB.
1.1 Previous Investigations
The previous environmental reports/documents have been prepared for the Project Corridor:
· Contaminated Soil Encountered During Old Snelling Avenue Bridge 62J17 Replacement,
email correspondence and laboratory analytical reports dated between November-
December 2018, by multiple consultants (2018 Bridge 62J17 Replacement);
· Geotechnical Boring Logs, Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements, dated October
3-4, 2019, by Northern Technologies, LLC (NTI) (2019 Geotechnical Borings);
· Memorandum, Information Pertaining to Spills, Tanks, Response Calls, or Other
Environmental Concerns, Snelling Avenue North, Arden Hills, dated February 10, 2020,
by the City of Arden Hills (2020 Memo);
· Desktop Contamination Review, Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements,
Arden Hills, Minnesota, dated January 23, 2020 by WSB (2020 Contamination Review);
and
· Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E
Improvements, County Road E to Trunk Highway 51, Arden Hills, MN 55112, dated
February 28, 2020 by WSB (2020 Phase I ESA).
Copies of the previous environmental documents are available from WSB by request. The
following is a summary of the previous environmental reports:
2018 Bridge 62J17 Replacement
Bridge 62J17 is located at the southern end of the Project Corridor approximately 240 feet
northwest of the intersection of Old Snelling Avenue and TH-51. The City replaced the bridge in
2018. On November 20, 2018, three soil samples were collected from three separate stockpiles
generated during construction. Soil samples SP-1, SP-2, and SP-3 were collected from
Stockpiles A, B, and C, respectively. The samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 Metals, and diesel range organics (DRO). The
following is a summary of the laboratory analytical results:
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 2
· No detections of RCRA 8 Metals or VOCs exceeded regulatory criteria.
· Multiple PAH compounds were detected in the stockpile samples above laboratory
reporting limits. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)-Equivalent concentrations of 1.6 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) were identified in stockpile samples SP-1 and SP-2, exceeding the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Screening Soil Leaching Value (SLV) of 1.4
mg/kg. Concentrations of PAHs and the corresponding BaP Equivalent were identified
above the laboratory reporting limits in sample SP-3 but below MPCA regulatory criteria.
· DRO was detected at a concentration of 103 mg/kg in stockpile sample SP-1, exceeding
the MPCA unregulated fill criteria for DRO of 100 mg/kg. DRO was identified at
concentrations of 66 mg/kg and 9.4 mg/kg in samples SP-2 and SP-3, respectively,
below the regulatory standard.
Landfill disposal of the soil from Stockpiles A and B was required based on BaP Equivalent
and/or DRO concentrations detected above the MPCA’s reuse criteria for unregulated fill. A total
of 486 cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed offsite during the bridge replacement
project. Soil from the third stockpile (Stockpile C) met the MPCA’s criteria of unregulated fill and
was presumed to have been reused at the site.
2019 Geotechnical Borings
In preparation for the roadway improvements project, 15 geotechnical soil borings (B-1 through B-
15) were completed throughout the Project Corridor in October 2019. The geotechnical borings
were advanced to 14.5 feet below grade and were advanced approximately every 400 linear feet
along the Project Corridor. While completing the borings, an “apparent hydrocarbon odor” was
noted at 11 of the 15 boring locations. The hydrocarbon odor was reported at locations
throughout the Project Corridor at various depths ranging from 0.3 to 14.5 feet below grade. No
analytical soil samples were collected during the geotechnical investigation. Groundwater was
encountered at 14 feet below grade at borings B-1, located at the south end of the Project
Corridor near Bridge 62J17, and B-12, located at the north end of the Project Corridor at CR E.
Groundwater was not encountered in the other geotechnical borings.
2020 Memo
The City prepared a memo in response to WSB’s request for historical material spills, tanks,
response calls, or hazardous material releases at the Project Corridor or adjacent sites. City staff
had no recollection of any spills or releases at the Project Corridor. The following additional
information was provided in the 2020 Memo:
· According to water main record plans dated 1968 and 1969, an 8-inch high pressure
natural gas pipeline historically extended along the east side of Old Snelling Avenue from
TH-51 to CR E. This pipeline was believed to have been replaced in 2018.
· An abandoned petroleum pipeline was discovered along Round Lake Road, south of
Ramsey County Road 96, several years ago. Based on the information provided, the
pipeline was located approximately two miles northwest of the Project Corridor and is not
presumed to be located at or adjacent to the Project Corridor.
2020 Contamination Review
The 2020 Contamination Review was prepared to identify verified or potentially contaminated
sites that may be encountered during the proposed Old Snelling Avenue and CR E Improvements
project. Available public database resources (e.g. MPCA / Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 3
(MDA) What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) and Minnesota Well Index (MWI)) were reviewed.
Multiple adjacent MPCA listings were identified along the Project Corridor indicating the presence
of a hazardous material spill or release. Therefore, a Phase I ESA was recommended to further
assess environmental risks at the Project Corridor prior to reconstruction.
2020 Phase I ESA
The 2020 Phase I ESA was prepared in conformance with ASTM Practice E1527-13. The PAH-
and DRO-impacted soil encountered during the 2018 Bridge 62J17 Replacement and the
petroleum odor noted during the 2019 Geotechnical Borings (discussed above) were considered
RECs associated with the Project Corridor. Further investigation (e.g. Field Investigation) of the
Project Corridor was recommended prior to roadway improvements for future environmental
planning purposes.
1.2 Scope of Work
The following tasks were conducted as part of this investigation to evaluate the current
subsurface soil, groundwater, and soil vapor conditions at the Project Corridor:
· Completed private and public utility locates through Gopher State One Call (GSOC)
service prior to boring advancement.
· Advanced 14 borings to depths of 16 feet below grade using a push probe drill rig for soil
and/or groundwater sample collection.
· Advanced two (2) borings to depths of 4 feet below grade using a push probe drill rig for
soil vapor sample collection.
· Assessed soil samples for visual and/or olfactory indications of contamination and
screened soil samples for organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID) equipped
with a 10.6 eV lamp. Soil types and profiles were recorded on boring logs in general
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).
· Utilized Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to record boring and soil vapor
sample locations.
· Collected and submitted select soil samples for one or more of the following laboratory
analyses:
o DRO using the Wisconsin Method;
o Gasoline range organics (GRO) using the Wisconsin Method;
o Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) using EPA Method 8260D;
o VOCs using EPA Method 8260D;
o Lead using EPA Method 6010D;
o Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals using EPA Method
6010D/7471B;
o Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270E; and
o Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using EPA Method 8082A.
· Collected and submitted select groundwater samples for the following laboratory
analyses:
o DRO using the Wisconsin Method;
o GRO using the Wisconsin Method;
o VOCs using EPA Method 8260D; and
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 4
o Lead using EPA Method 6010D.
· Collected and submitted soil vapor samples for the following laboratory analysis:
o VOCs using Method TO-15
· Sealed all borings in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
requirements.
· Prepared report detailing field observations, laboratory results, conclusions and
recommendations.
Details of the tasks completed during this investigation are discussed in the following sections.
General field methods are included as Appendix A.
1.3 Work Plan Deviations
The work was completed in accordance with WSB’s Field Investigation Work Plan, dated March
18, 2020, except for the following deviations:
· Soil sampling intervals with evidence of contamination were submitted for analysis of full
VOCs, rather than only BTEX.
· Select soil samples were submitted for full RCRA Metals, in addition to lead, for waste
characterization / landfill approval purposes.
· Groundwater was encountered at borings EB-1, EB-8, and EB-12. As a result, only three
groundwater samples were collected for laboratory analysis instead of seven.
· Groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of VOCs, rather than only BTEX.
The deviations were approved by the City prior to submitting the samples for laboratory analysis.
No other deviations from the original Field Investigation Work Plan were encountered.
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 5
2. Investigation
A total of 16 environmental borings (EB-1 through EB-14; SV-2 and SV-9) were advanced at the Project
Corridor on April 16 and 17, 2020 to investigate potential impacts to soil, groundwater, and soil vapor.
The environmental borings were completed by Bergerson Caswell Inc. of Maple Plain, Minnesota using a
truck-mounted push probe drill rig. The environmental boring locations are depicted on Figure 2.
2.1 Soil Sampling
Continuous sampling, using a four-foot long rod with a new acetate liner for each sample, was
conducted at each boring to a terminus depth of 16 feet below grade. Soil profiles were assessed
at two-foot intervals and labeled accordingly. Each sample was visually examined for evidence of
contamination, field classified, and screened for organic vapors using a PID equipped with a 10.6
eV lamp. Soil boring logs are included as Appendix B.
A total of 28 soil samples were collected during this investigation and submitted to Eurofins
TestAmerica Laboratory of Cedar Falls, Iowa (Eurofins) for analysis of DRO, GRO, BTEX, VOCs,
lead, RCRA Metals, PAHs, and/or PCBs. Two soil samples were submitted from each boring.
Soil samples were submitted from intervals with evidence of contamination (e.g. elevated PID
readings, petroleum-like odors, staining, etc.). If no evidence of contamination was observed,
samples were submitted from intervals of 4-6 feet below grade and 8-10 feet below grade.
The soil samples collected from borings EB-1, EB-2, and EB-8 were submitted for laboratory
analysis of full VOCs (rather than only BTEX) due to evidence of contamination observed in the
field. Soil samples EB-3 (8-10), EB-8 (2-4), EB-8 (8-10), and EB-13 (4-6) were submitted for
laboratory analysis of full RCRA Metals (rather than only lead) and PCBs for waste
characterization and landfill acceptance purposes.
Laboratory reports are included as Appendix C. Following completion of sampling and screening
activities, the borings were sealed with bentonite grout in accordance with MDH requirements.
2.2 Groundwater Sampling
Three (3) groundwater samples were collected from borings EB-1, EB-8, and EB-12 and
submitted to Eurofins for analysis of DRO, GRO, VOCs, and lead. Shallow groundwater was
encountered in these three borings at depths ranging from 5.10 to 12.05 feet below grade.
Groundwater was not encountered in the remaining 11 borings. Groundwater samples were
collected by installing a temporary PVC monitoring well screen and using a check valve and
polyethylene tubing to draw the sample. Water level measurements and screen depths are
included in the soil boring logs in Appendix B. Groundwater samples were identified using the
boring number.
2.3 Soil Vapor Sampling
Two (2) soil vapor samples, SV-2 and SV-9, were advanced to 4 feet below grade and submitted
to Eurofins for analysis of VOCs. The soil vapor samples were paired with their respective boring
numbers (e.g. soil vapor sample SV-2 was collected at boring EB-2). The soil vapor samples
were collected using 1-liter stainless steel canisters equipped with a regulator calibrated to collect
a 5-minute sample draw.
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 6
3. Results
3.1 Soil Sample Results
A total of 14 soil borings were advanced to depths of 16 feet below grade. Twenty-eight (28) soil
samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil analytical results are
summarized in Table 1, which also includes applicable MPCA Tier I Residential Soil Reference
Values (SRVs), Tier II Industrial SRVs, and Screening Soil Leaching Values (SLVs). The
laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix C. The following is a summary of the soil
sample results:
· In general, geology at the Project Corridor consisted of sand (fine to medium grain) from
the ground surface to depths ranging from 2 to 6 feet below grade. Soil underlying the
sand consisted largely of silty and sandy clay to terminal depths of 16 feet below grade.
Fill (sand, fine to medium grain) was noted in boring EB-3 from 1 to 15 feet below grade.
· No elevated PID readings (> 10 parts per million (ppm)) were observed during the
investigation. The highest reading (6.2 ppm) was detected at boring EB-2 from 0 to 2
feet below grade. PID screening results are included in boring logs in Appendix B.
· A petroleum-like odor was observed in borings EB-1 from 5 to 9.5 feet below grade, EB-2
from 1 to 4.5 feet below grade, and EB-8 from 3 to 3.5 and 8.5 to 9.5 feet below grade.
Black staining accompanied the petroleum-like odor in boring EB-1. No evidence of
contamination was observed at the other boring locations.
· Naphthalene was detected in soil sample EB-8 (2-4) at a concentration of 6.87 mg/kg,
exceeding the Screening SLV of 4.5 mg/kg. Naphthalene was detected in soil samples
EB-1 (6-8), EB-2 (2-4), and EB-8 (8-10) but at concentrations below the SRVs and SLV.
No other VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples.
· PAHs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in soil samples collected from
borings EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, EB-5, EB-6, EB-8, and EB-9. Soil sample EB-3 (8-10) had a
benzo(a)pyrene concentration of 6.08 mg/kg, exceeding the Tier II Industrial SRV of 3
mg/kg, and a BaP Equivalent concentration of 8.669 mg/kg, exceeding the Tier I
Residential SRV of 2 mg/kg. Soil samples EB-8 (2-4) and EB-8 (8-10) had
benzo(a)pyrene concentrations of 20.4 and 45.3 mg/kg, respectively, exceeding the Tier
II Industrial SRV, and BaP Equivalent concentrations of 29.713 and 65.902 mg/kg,
respectively, exceeding the Tier II Industrial SRV of 23 mg/kg. No other PAH detections
in soil exceeded regulatory criteria.
· Arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, and mercury were detected in multiple soil samples at
concentrations above laboratory reporting limits but below regulatory criteria.
· DRO was detected in soil samples EB-3 (8-10), EB-8 (2-4), and EB-8 (8-10) at
concentrations of 102, 1,160, and 366 mg/kg, respectively, exceeding the MPCA criteria
for unregulated fill of 100 mg/kg DRO. DRO was detected above laboratory reporting
limits but below MPCA criteria in soil samples EB-1 (6-8), EB-2 (2-4), EB-3 (4-6), EB-5
(4-6), EB-5 (8-10), EB-12 (4-6), EB-13 (4-6), and EB-13 (8-10) at concentrations ranging
from 7.53 to 79.8 mg/kg.
· No GRO concentrations were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the samples.
· No PCB concentrations were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the samples.
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 7
3.2 Groundwater Sample Results
Three (3) groundwater samples were collected from borings EB-1, EB-8, and EB-12 during this
investigation. Groundwater samples were identified using the boring number (GW-1, GW-8, and
GW-12). Prior to sampling, groundwater levels were measured at depths ranging from 5.10 to
9.21 feet below grade at borings EB-1, EB-8, and EB-12; groundwater was not encountered in
the other 11 borings. Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 2, which also
includes applicable MDH Health Risk Limits (HRLs) and MPCA limits for contaminated
groundwater discharges, where established, for comparison purposes. A copy of the laboratory
analytical report is included in Appendix C. The following is a summary of the groundwater
analytical results:
· No sheen was observed in the groundwater samples.
· No GRO or VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the groundwater
samples.
· Lead was detected in each groundwater sample at concentrations ranging from 300
micrograms per liter (µg/L) to 1,580 µg/L. No HRLs or limits for contaminated discharge
are established for lead in groundwater.
· DRO was detected in sample GW-8 at a concentration of 244 µg/L, which was below the
MPCA criteria for remedial investigation of 1,000 µg/L. DRO was not detected above
laboratory reporting limits in groundwater samples GW-1 and GW-12.
3.3 Soil Vapor Results
Two (2) soil vapor samples were collected from four feet below grade at borings EB-2 and EB-9
during the investigation and submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil vapor samples were identified
using the boring number ((SV-2 (4FT) and SV-9 (4FT)). The soil vapor sample results are
summarized in Table 3. The sampling results were compared to the MPCA 33X residential and
commercial/industrial intrusion screening values (ISVs). The 33X ISVs were established to
evaluate soil gas and predict the amount of a contaminant in indoor air that may result from vapor
intrusion. A copy of the laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix C. The following is a
summary of the soil vapor analytical results:
· No elevated PID readings were observed while collecting the soil vapor samples.
· 1,3-Butadiene was detected above the 33X residential ISV (9.3 micrograms per cubic
meter (µg/m3)) in soil vapor samples SV-2 (4FT) and SV-9 (4FT) at concentrations of 50
and 38 µg/m3, respectively.
· Nine additional petroleum VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits but at
concentrations below the 33X residential ISVs. These compounds included benzene,
ethanol, ethylbenzene, n-heptane, n-hexane, propylene, toluene (methylbenzene), m&p-
xylene and o-xylene.
· Three non-petroleum VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits but at
concentrations below the 33X residential ISVs. These compounds included 2-butanone
(methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)), cyclohexane, and tetrachloroethene (PCE).
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 8
4. Discussions and Conclusions
This Field Investigation was conducted to evaluate current subsurface soil, groundwater, and soil vapor
conditions for the proposed Old Snelling Avenue and CR E Improvements project in Arden Hills,
Minnesota. An analytical exceedance map is included as Figure 3. The following discussion and
conclusion information is provided:
· PAH- and DRO-impacted soil above MPCA reuse criteria was identified at borings EB-3 and EB-
8. Benzo(a)pyrene was detected in soil samples EB-3 (8-10), EB-8 (2-4), and EB-8 (8-10) above
the Tier II Industrial SRV. BaP Equivalent concentrations were detected above the Tier I
Residential SRV in sample EB-3 (8-10) and above the Tier II Industrial SRV in samples EB-8 (2-
4) and EB-8 (8-10). DRO exceeded MPCA criteria for unregulated fill in samples EB-3 (8-10),
EB-8 (2-4), and EB-8 (8-10). Offsite disposal of excavated regulated fill at an MPCA-permitted
landfill will be required during reconstruction.
· 1,3-Butadiene was detected in both soil vapor samples above the Residential 33X ISV. 1,3-
Butadiene is often found in urban environments due to its association with petroleum products,
vehicle exhaust, and asphalt. It is unlikely that 1,3-butadiene stems from a release of hazardous
substances at the Project Corridor.
· No evidence of contamination was identified in the groundwater samples collected from borings
EB-1, EB-8, and EB-12. No compounds exceeded regulatory criteria and no odors or sheen were
noted in the field during collection of the groundwater samples.
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 9
5. Recommendations
Based on the results of this Field Investigation, WSB provides the following recommendations:
· Prepare a Response Action Plan / Construction Contingency Plan (RAP/CCP) for the proposed
reconstruction of the Project Corridor. The RAP/CCP will ensure all encountered contamination
(documented and undocumented) is managed in accordance with local, state, and federal
regulations.
· Enroll the project into the MPCA’s Brownfield Program for eligible technical assistance and/or
liability assurances related to the PAH and DRO contamination present at the Project Corridor.
The RAP/CCP should be submitted to the MPCA for review and approval prior to the start of the
project. The MPCA charges $125 per hour for Brownfield Program services.
· An environmental professional should be onsite to oversee, screen, and document all excavation
and disturbances near known or suspected areas of contamination during reconstruction. This will
be a requirement of the MPCA approved RAP/CCP.
Field Investigation Report
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Page 10
6. Limitations
The conclusions and recommendations provided in this report are based on field observations and
soil and soil vapor sample analysis completed for this investigation. The services performed by WSB
have been conducted with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the
profession practicing in the same locality under similar budget and time constraints. No other warranty is
made or intended.
Field Investigation Report Figures
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000
FIGURES
Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Snelling AveTiller La
I ngerson Rd
Harriet Ave
M-98
ArdenPlRidgewoodCtCR-99
L am ett i LaChatham CtLakeJohanna Bl v d
Lake LaAsbu
ryAveCounty E Rd
Fernwood StN Pascal AveS k ile s L a
Glenard enCtHuntersCt
NDunlapStGlenarden RdIngerso
n
C
t
M ccrackenLaShoreline LaNSnellingAve
Red Fox Rd
Glenhill R d
Bussard Ct
Grey Fox Rd
W
E
dgewater Ave Cannon A v eHamlineAveNC onn
ellyStCarlton DrForestLaSiemsCtPine Tree DrS h orewoodDr Benton
WayRidgewoodRd
Sandeen
R
d Dunlap StOak Ave
CSAH 7 3
A r d en O aksD
r
C hatham A v eProject Corridor
0 1,000Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Corridor Location
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase II _ Field Investigation\Figure1_ProjectCorridorLocation.mxd Date Saved: 4/28/2020 9:54:31 AM1 inch = 1,000 feet
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Tiller La
In g erson RdN Sne
l
l
ing
Ave
Arden PlRidgewoodCt Arden Oaks DrL am e tti L a
County E RdLakeJohannaBlvd
LamettiCirA r d e n Oaks Ct
N Pascal AveSkiles La
Glenarden CtGlenarden RdConnellySt
Cummings
La
N
D
u
nl
ap StHamlineAveNBussard Ct
Cannon A v e
F orest L a
SiemsCtRidge
woodRdOak Ave
EB-1 *
EB-3
EB-4
EB-5
EB-6
EB-7
EB-8 *
EB-10
EB-11
EB-9
EB-2
EB-13EB-12 *EB-14
SV-2
SV-9
!(Environmental Boring
!(Soil Vapor Boring
Project Corridor
0 525Feet¯Figure 2 - Environmental Boring Locations
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase II _ Field Investigation\Figure2_EnvironmentalBoringLocations.mxd Date Saved: 5/4/2020 1:20:36 PM1 inch = 525 feet
* = Groundwater sample collected
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(Snelling Ave?ÖA@
Tiller La
In g erson RdN Sne
l
l
ing
Ave
Arden PlRidgewoodCt Arden Oaks DrL am e tti L a
County E RdLakeJohannaBlvd
LamettiCirA r d e n Oaks Ct
N Pascal AveSkiles La
Glenarden CtGlenarden RdConnellySt
Cummings
La
N
D
u
nl
ap StHamlineAveNBussard Ct
Cannon A v e
F orest L a
SiemsCtRidge
woodRdOak Ave
EB-1 *
EB-2
EB-3
EB-4
EB-5
EB-6
EB-7
EB-8 *
EB-9
EB-10
EB-11
EB-12 *EB-13EB-14
SV-2
SV-9
!(Environmental Boring
!(Soil Vapor Boring
Project Corridor
0 525Feet¯Figure 3 - Analytical Exceedances
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN Document Path: K:\015447-000\GIS\Maps\Phase II _ Field Investigation\Figure3_Analytical Exceedances.mxd Date Saved: 5/7/2020 7:34:30 AM1 inch = 525 feet
* = Groundwater sample collected
Samp le ID SV-2 (4FT)
Samp le Date 4/16/2020
1,3-Butadiene 50 9.3 90
Residential33X ISV
(μg/m 3)
Volatile Organic Comp ounds (VOCs)
Commercial / Industrial33X ISV (μg/m 3)
Samp le ID SV-9 (4FT)
Samp le Date 4/16/2020
1,3-Butadiene 38 9.3 90
Residential33X ISV (μg/m 3)
Volatile Organic Comp ounds (VOCs)
Commercial / Industrial33X ISV (μg/m 3)
Samp le ID (Dep th Interval)EB-8 (2-4) EB-8 (8-10)
Samp le Date 04/16/202004/16/2020
Naphthalene 6.87 2.14 10 28 4.5
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Benzo[a]pyrene 20.4 45.3 2 3 1.4
Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 29.713 65.902 2 23 1.4
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
DRO 1160 366 100*NE NE
Tier I Residential SRV (mg/kg) Tier II Industrial SRV (mg/kg)Screening SLV (mg/kg)
Samp le ID (Dep th Interval)EB-3 (8-10)
Samp le Date 04/16/2020
Naphthalene NA 10 28 4.5
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Benzo[a]pyrene 6.08 2 3 1.4
Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 8.669 2 23 1.4
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
DRO 102 100*NE NE
Tier I Residential SRV (mg/kg) Tier II Industrial SRV (mg/kg)Screening SLV (mg/kg)
Page 1 of 2
AGENDA ITEM – 1E
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 20, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer
SUBJECT: Fall Recreation Guide and Adult and Youth Recreations Programs
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources:
$17,250 TBD General Fund - Recreation
Council Should Consider
City Council direction is requested regarding the development, printing, and mailing of the Fall
Recreation Guide and also if staff should be planning and scheduling adult and youth fall programs.
Background
The City of Arden Hills develops, prints, and mails a Recreation Guide three separate times
(spring/summer, fall, and winter) throughout the year. Staff typically begins development of the
Fall Recreation Guide in early July. The Fall Recreation Guide is usually sent to the printer
around mid-July and is mailed out to residents in late July. The Fall Recreation guide highlights
all the adult and youth programs that occur between August and December. Programs include
soccer and football leagues, before and after school programs, dance, yoga, tai chi, adult day
trips, adult foot care clinics, and more. The printing and mailing of the 2020 Spring/Summer
Recreation Guide cost $4,913. The Fall Recreation Guide is smaller so the cost would be a little
lower compared to the Spring/Summer Recreation Guide (the 2019 cost was $3,556). A copy of
the Fall Recreation Guide from 2019 is provided in Attachment A.
Adjacent communities have resumed some limited adult and youth programs this summer and
are planning to continue with programs in the fall. The City of Shoreview resumed leagues and
camps in June 2020. They are operating around 50% of their usual participation level. Shoreview
has a total of 749 participants (347 in leagues and 412 in camps). Shoreview’s adult softball
league currently has eight teams (12 participants per team).
New Brighton has also resumed leagues this summer and is operating a little under 50% of their
usual participation level. New Brighton has 130 youth league participants and 28 total adult
softball teams (12-15 participants per team).
Page 2 of 2
The City of Roseville resumed adult and youth leagues in July. They estimate that their numbers
are down roughly 30% this summer. Roseville currently has 102 softball teams, 37 volleyball
teams, and 8 bocce ball teams. All are seeing their numbers increase as they continue to promote
for fall leagues, camps, classes, and other programs.
Staff has communicated with the Mounds View School District about the availability to hold the
City’s before and after school programs in the schools this fall. The Mounds View School
District is still waiting to see what the Governor decides about schools. The School District is
slowly beginning to open facilities and are requiring organizations to send COVID-19
preparedness plans. They are currently accepting fall facility requests, but noting that things may
look different and time and space may be reduced for additional cleaning. Permits can be issued,
but in the event that school closes, then permits would be revised or cancelled.
Council Direction
Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding how the City should approach fall
programming and if staff should create a Fall Recreation Guide for 2020.
1. Should staff move forward with planning fall youth and adult programs?
2. Should staff develop, print and mail a Fall Recreation Guide for 2020?
3. Should staff open up applications and hire seasonal Parks and Recreation staff for the
fall?
Budget Impacts
Attachment B provides a summary of monthly revenue and expenditures for recreation programs
during 2018 through 2020 YTD. In the fall of 2019, the estimated cost of fall programs (July-
September) was $34,180.65 (not including full time employees) and the estimated revenue was
$18,519 (the actual revenue from fall programs may be more as some fall programs are open for
registration starting in the spring). These numbers do not reflect the reduced class sizes due to
COVID-19.
Attachments
Attachment A – 2019 Fall Recreation Guide
Attachment B – Revenues and Expenditures for Recreation
1
Inside this Issue
Fall Soccer / Flag Football Preschool Skills Classes ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 2
Arden Hills Opportunities Sponsorship Before School Programs ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 3
After School Programs Bowling Camp ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 4
Special Events Dance Programs ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 5 Volleyball League Special Recognition ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 6 Active Adult Activities ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 7-8
Registration Form and Information ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 9-10
Map ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 11 Athletic Associations Office Information ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 12
Register online at
www.cityofardenhills.org
Follow all your City News
@cityofardenhills.org
Follow us on
Follow us on
2
Get ready for some family fun with our new family bowling nights.
Sign up for one night or all three to participate in unique games designed
for families. Prizes will be given out each week. All skill levels welcome
to participate. Bumpers are available to bowlers who would like to use them.
$40.00 per family (4-6 bowlers)
Includes Shoe & Ball Rental
4:30 - 6:30 pm
Flaherty’s Arden Bowl
Saturday, September 14
Saturday, October 12
Saturday, November 9
Fall Co-Rec Soccer League
$66 resident, $76 non-resident
$25 late fee after Friday, July 26
19FYSL00 Ages 4-6 (Mini Mites)
19FYSL01 Grades 1-2 (Mites)
19FYSL02 Grades 3-4 (Squirts)
19FYSL03 Grades 5-6 (Pee Wees)
Fall Flag Football Leagues
$86 resident, $96 non-resident
$25 late fee after Friday, July 26
19FYFF00 Grades K-1
19FYFF01 Grades 2-3
19FYFF02 Grades 4-6
FALL SOCCER & FLAG FOOTBALL LEAGUES
Volunteer coaches are needed for soccer and flag football. We are unable to provide coaches. COACHES WAIVER: If you sign up to be a head coach, your child’s registration fee will be waived (one child per team coached). Coaches must still pay the player jersey fee.
The Fall Soccer and Flag Football deadline was July 26th. If you would like to still
register (and space is still available), please contact the Parks & Recreation Department
to inquire about availability. Friend requests may not be able to be honored.
Fall Co-Rec Soccer League Participants will receive an Arden Hills Parks and Rec-
reation T-shirt with a paid registration fee.
NFL Flag Football League Participants will receive a NFL team reversible jersey
with a paid registration fee.
Family Fun Night—Flaherty’s Bowling
Preschool Skills Classes
Sports Sampler Class
Join us for a fun, basic introduction to
basketball, soccer and kickball!
Through games and activities,
participants will learn the skills of
dribbling, running, passing, shooting
and teamwork. Classes will be held
outside at Cummings Park.
Ages 4-6 ♦
$45 resident, $55 non-resident
19FYPS00
Registration Deadline:
Monday, September 2
Mondays/Wednesdays ♦ 5:45-6:30 pm
September 9-September 25
Cummings Park
Kindergarten Wrestling League
The Mounds View High School wrestling
staff run an after school wrestling league for
students in grades K-5th. Students
attending Snail Lake K center and Pike Lake
K center will be practicing at the MVHS
wrestling room on October 22 & 23, along
with October 29 & 30. At the end of the
program there is an all school wrestling
tournament at MVHS. This year’s
tournament is on Saturday, November 2nd.
Wrestling shoes or any other equipment are
not required. If you have any questions
please feel free to e-mail (cklitecky@comcast.net)
or call at (651-707 6913).
19FYKW00
Registration Deadline:
Tuesday, September 3
Tuesdays/Wednesdays ♦ 5:45-6:30 pm
October 22-October 30
Mounds View High School Wrestling Room
Preschool Ninja Class
Is your child ready to go through
exciting obstacle courses, jump over
hurdles and crawl through tunnels?
Get ready to race! Your child will have
so much fun in this fast paced, active
class! Classes will be held outside at
Cummings Park.
Ages 4-6 ♦
$45 resident, $55 non-resident
19FYNPW00
Registration Deadline:
Tuesday, September 3
Tuesdays/Thursdays ♦ 5:45-6:30 pm
September 10-September 26
Cummings Park
3
UPCOMING ARDEN HILLS EVENTS AND INFORMATION
Interested in signing up for an Arden Hills Parks and Recreation
Program but need financial assistance? The City of Arden Hills
and the Arden Hills Foundation have developed a scholarship
program for families in Arden Hills. To inquire about a
scholarship please contact Sara Knoll at
sknoll@cityofardenhills.org.
Wrestling League
The Mounds View High School wrestling staff run an after school wres-
tling league for students in grades K-5th. Each student attending Island
Lake, Turtle Lake and Valentine Hills each have their own team that
practices in their perspective gyms after school run by Mounds View
wrestling alumni and staff. Practices start at the end of September and
run for six weeks. At the end of the program there is an all school
wrestling tournament at MVHS. This year’s tournament is on Saturday,
November 2nd. Wrestling shoes or any other equipment are not re-
quired. If you have any questions please feel free to e-mail
(cklitecky@comcast.net) or call (651-707 6913).
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYWR00
Registration Deadline: Wednesday, September 18
Wednesdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
September 25-October 30
Valentine Hills Elementary - Gym
Soccer
Sign up today for one of the most popular sports for fall - soccer.
Players will learn and develop different skills in a fun setting.
Show off your moves and score with this exciting class!
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYSS00
Registration Deadline: Thursday, September 26
Thursdays ♦ 8:05-9:05 am
October 3-November 14
(No Class 10/17)
Valentine Hills Elementary - Gym
Pickleball
Are you ready to see what pickleball is all about? This
new and exciting class will teach you all about this fun
game. Pickleball is a cross between tennis and ping pong.
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYPB00
Registration Deadline: Monday, September 23
Mondays ♦ 8:05-9:05 am
September 30-November 4
Valentine Hills Elementary - Gym
Ninja Warrior
Climb, jump, crawl and compete against your best time in
this fast paced class. You will help create new and
exciting obstacle courses with ninja equipment!
Grades 3-5 ♦ $50
19FYNW00
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, October 1
Tuesdays♦ 8:05-9:05 am
October 8-November 19
(no class 11/5)
Valentine Hills Elementary - Gym
19FYNW01
Registration Deadline: Wednesday, October 2
Wednesdays ♦ 8:05-9:05 am
October 9-November 13
Valentine Hills Elementary - Gym
BEFORE / After SCHOOL PROGRAMS - Valentine Hills
Fall Soccer & Fall Flag Football Starts
August 19-October 12
If you have not been contacted by your
coach please contact the Arden Hills
Parks & Recreation office at 651-792-7800.
Looking for a way to get involved in the City of Arden
Hills? The Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee is
seeking applications. If you are interested in being a part
of this Committee please fill out an application on our
website at: www.cityofardenhills.org.
Halloween Monster Mash
Saturday, October 26
Arden Hills City Hall
More information available on page 5
4
AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS— Island Lake Elementary School
All Island Lake Sports classes are offered in cooperation with Shoreview Parks & Recreation
Soccer
Get ready to have some fall fun with this soccer class. Play
exciting games and learn new skills to take to the field!
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYSS01 - Session 1
Registration Deadline: Wednesday, September 11
Wednesdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
September 18 - October 23
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
19FYSS02 - Session 2
Registration Deadline: Wednesday, October 30
Wednesdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
November 6 - December 18
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
Pickleball
Are you ready to see what pickleball is all about? This new and
exciting class will teach you all about this fun game. Pickleball
is a cross between tennis and ping pong.
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYPB00 - Session 1
Registration Deadline: Thursday, September 12
Thursdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
September 19 - October 31
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
19FYPB02 - Session 2
Registration Deadline: Thursday, October 31
Thursdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
November 7 - December 19
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
Basketball
Gear up for the basketball season with this fall class.
Work on different skills and drills in a fun setting!
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
19FYBB01 - Session 1
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, September 10
Tuesdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
September 17 - October 22
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
19FYBB02 - Session 2
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, October 29
Tuesdays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
November 5 - December 17
Island Lake Elementary - West Gym
Wrestling League
The Mounds View High School wrestling staff run
an after school wrestling league for students in grades
K-5th. Each student attending Island Lake, Turtle Lake
and Valentine Hills each have their own team that prac-
tices in their perspective gyms after school run by
Mounds View wrestling alumni and staff. Practices start
at the end of September and run for six weeks. At the
end of the program there is an all school wrestling
tournament at MVHS. This year’s tournament is on Sat-
urday, November 2nd. Wrestling shoes or any other
equipment are not required. If you have any questions
please feel free to e-mail (cklitecky@comcast.net) or
call (651-707 6913).
Grades 1-5 ♦ $50
SESSION I: 19FYWR00
Registration Deadline: Monday, September 16
Mondays ♦ 4:05-5:05 pm
September 23-October 28
Island Lake Elementary School - West Gym
Don’t forget you can sign up
online for all activities at:
www.cityofardenhills.org
5
SPECIAL EVENTS
Halloween Monster Mash
What could be more fun and a little spooky than winning prizes at a carnival,
playing Ghost Bingo, creating Halloween crafts, carving/decorating your own
pumpkin and a pizza dinner? Dress to impress in your favorite Halloween
costume. This is a fun event for the entire family! Special prizes will be given
out to participants in costume! Join us at Arden Hills City Hall for a wonderful
evening of family fun!
Ages 2-10 ♦ $10.00 per person (child or adult)
Children must be accompanied by a paid adult.
PRE-REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED.
19FYHE00
Registration Deadline:
Wednesday, October 23
Saturday, October 26 ♦ 5:30-7:00 pm
Arden Hills City Hall
Hop N Tots Creative Dance with Tap
Here’s a class for kids with energy to spare! Have fun
with rhythm and movement while exercising your body.
Students will be introduced to basic beginning tap and
ballet technique. Tap a nd ballet shoes are required
and will be available for purchase the first week of
class, if needed ($20 tap, $16 ballet).
Ages 3-4 ♦ $90 Resident, $100 Non-Resident
19FYDA00
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, September 3
Tuesdays ♦ 5:30-6:15 pm
September 17-December 10
(no class on 11/26)
Arden Hills City Hall - Community Room
Creative Dance with Tap
This isn’t your ordinary dance class! We use scarves,
pom poms, and rhythm instruments to explore and
experience dance. We will introduce beginning tap
throughout this session. Tap and ballet shoes are
required and will be available for purchase the
first week of class, if needed ($20 tap, $16 ballet).
Ages 5-Kindergarten ♦ $90 Resident, $100 Non-Resident
19FYDA01
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, September 3
Tuesdays ♦ 6:15-7:00 pm
September 17-December 10
(no class on 11/26)
Arden Hills City Hall - Community Room
Tap, Jazz, and Ballet
Learn the basics of tap, jazz, and ballet in a fun, relaxed
environment. Tap and ballet shoe s are re quired and will be
available for purchase the first week of class, if needed
($20 tap, $16 ballet).
Grades 1-3 ♦ $90 Resident, $100 Non-Resident
19FYDA02
Registration Deadline: Tuesday, September 3
Tuesdays ♦ 7:00-7:45 pm
September 17-December 10
(no class on 11/26)
Arden Hills City Hall - Community Room
Arden Hills classes will end
with a small recital on 12/10
at the Valentine Hills
Elementary School gym.
A second dance session will
be offered beginning in
January, and conclude with
an end of the season
recital.
DANCE PROGRAMS
6
VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE
Winter Girls Volleyball League
Recreational league play for girls grades 4-8. This instructional league will teach girls the basic skills, rules, and
strategies of the fun and exciting game of volleyball. Program consists of one practice and one game each week.
Games and practices will last for one hour. Game and practice times will vary each week. Tuesdays will be
between 5:30-8:30 pm and Saturdays between 9:00 am-2:00 pm. Players will receive a t-shirt. This league is run
in cooperation with Shoreview & Mounds View Parks and Recreation.
Grades 4-8 ♦ $67 resident, $77 non-resident
Registration Deadline: Friday, November 29, $25 late fee after deadline. Registrations submitted after the
November 29 deadline will be subject to availability and no special friend requests are accepted after the deadline.
You may request to be on a team with a friend, but that friend must request you as well. One special request per
player, no chain requests will be allowed. All teammate requests must be submitted by November 29. There is
no guarantee that special friend requests can be honored.
No requests, roster changes, or refunds will be honored after the November 29 deadline.
A volunteer coach will contact you with the time of your first practice in late December
after the coaches meeting. A detailed schedule for the whole season will be given out
at the first practice.
Every attempt is made to organize teams by schools or neighborhoods.
LEAGUES
Tuesday evenings and Saturday mornings
January 7-March 7
Turtle Lake Elementary & Mounds View
Community Center
Setters, Grades 4-5 19WYVL00
Spikers, Grades 6-8 19WYVL01
Volunteer coaches are needed for the Girls Volleyball League. If you sign up to be a coach, your child’s
registration fee will be waived (one child per team coached). Please complete the box on the registration
form if you are interested in coaching.
COACH’S MEETING
Tuesday, December 17
6:30-7:30 pm
Shoreview Community Center
Island Lake Room
SPECIAL RECOGNITION
Parks and Recreation would like to express our sincere thanks to the many individuals who have volunteered
countless hours of their time. Many programs and special events would have been difficult to provide if it were
not for the volunteer efforts of so many great people. Thank you! Listed are our many 2019 volunteer coaches.
Thank you for your hard work and dedication! If we have neglected to list anyone’s name, please accept our
apologies and our sincere thanks.
Lisa Bruhn
Ryan Clark
Caleb Cordes
Joe Federer
April Haas
Mike Hagen
Kyle Hames
Kristen Hansen
Nick Harmon
Nick Hulst
Tim Jackson
Matt Jergenson
Erik Johnson
Ross Johnson
Kelly Kannapiran
Madhu Kannapiran
Ann King
John Kline
Jesse LaMere
Monica LaMere
Amelia Langner
Doug Lieser
Lacy Loosbrock
Nikki Ludwig
Jordan Luhmann
Chris Nelson
Blaine Niven
Steve Olson
Kevin O’Toole
Rob Speake
Pieter Spitael
Heidi Stone
Nick Turco
Andrea Winiecki
Jon Wynia
Tom Yang
7
Active Adult Activites - Day Trips
6
Chanhassen Dinner Theater - Mamma Mia!
A daughter planning her wedding longs to discover the identity of her father. Through the story-telling magic of
ABBA’s timeless popular songs propel this delightful story of love, laughter and friendship. The Pioneer Press
and other local critics agree that it is a MUST SEE! A large cast, non-stop laughs and explosive dance numbers
makes Mamma Mia! A guaranteed smash hit that will have you dancing in your chairs! Price includes
transportation, ticket and lunch with drink.
$90 Resident, $100 Non-Resident
19FAMM00
Registration Deadline Wednesday, August 7
Wednesday, September 4
9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Bus will pick up and drop off at the
Shoreview Community Center - Upstairs Lobby
A Swedish Christmas
Tour the exquisite Turnblad Mansion, home of The American Swedish Institute, with the décor exhibit
Christmas Through the Years. A traditional Swedish lunch is served at the mansion with time for shopping at the
Bokhandel gift shop featuring crystal and glass, art, collectables and more. Following lunch and shopping the
bus will head to Ingebretsen’s Scandinavian Center. The store is dedicated Scandinavian gift items, clothing,
baked goods, Nordic foods, lutefisk and more. Menu: meatballs, gravy, potatoes, rye bread with butter, beet
salad, cucumber salad, dessert and beverage.
$75 Resident, $85 Non-Resident
19WASC00
Registration Deadline Thursday, November 7
Thursday, December 5
9:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Bus will pick up and drop off at the
Shoreview Community Center - Upstairs Lobby
Chateau St. Croix Winery, Aamodts Apple Orchard, Shopping & Lowell Inn Lunch
Starting at the St. Croix Winery Store and Aamodts Apple Farm in Stillwater you’ll have the opportunity to
purchase award-winning wines, and apples inside the nostalgic apple barn. Next you will head to the Lowell Inn
for lunch. Menu: Chicken Ala King - tender pieces of chicken, mushrooms, red and green peppers in a sherry
cream sauce served over a puff pastry shell, mashed potatoes, vegetable of they day, beverage and a small
desert. After lunch it is off to the Northern Vineyards that is within walking distance to many shops and Maple
Island Brewing. Finally we will arrive at Chateau St. Croix Winery in the picturesque St. Croix River Valley.
Explore the old-world charm of a winery created in the image of a European Estate.
$70 Resident, $80 Non-Resident
19FACS00
Registration Deadline Monday, September 9
Friday, October 11
9:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Bus will pick up and drop off at the
Shoreview Community Center - Upstairs Lobby
8
ACTIVE ADULT ACTIVITIES
AARP Driver Safety Program
The AARP Driver Safety Program is designed for motorist’s age 55
and older. Upon completion of one of these seminars, you will be
entitled to a discount on your auto insurance premium. For the first
time, one attends the 8-hour seminar. To retain the insurance
premium discount, everyone should attend the 4-hour refresher
seminar every 3 years. Please bring your current driver’s license
with you. Registration deadline is 3 days prior to the class. This rate
includes an Arden Hills administration fee. AARP member
cards must be presented at the time of registration to qualify for
member rates.
$20 AARP rate, $25 non-member rate
8-Hour Course (must be taken first)
Wednesday , October 16 & Thursday, October 17 19FAAD00
5:30-9:30 pm
Arden Hills City Hall - Community Room
4-Hour Day Course
9:00am-1:00 pm
Tuesday, September 24 19FAAD01
Tuesday, October 22 19FAAD02
Tuesday, November 19 19FAAD03
Arden Hills City Hall - Community Room
AARP CarFit Event - FREE
Helping Mature Drivers Find their Safest Fit
Although older drivers are the demographic group with the highest
rate of seatbelt use - and the lowest percentage of alcohol-related
accidents - they are more likely to be killed or seriously injured
when a crash occurs. Why? Older drivers are more physically
fragile than their younger counterparts, and they're generally less
able to withstand the impact of a vehicular accident. Fortunately,
there are ways for drivers to adapt to their cars - and adjust to their
“fit” within them - in order to reduce their risk of injury during a
crash. CarFit, a free educational program created by the American
Society on Aging and developed in collaboration with AAA, AARP
and the American Occupational Therapy Association, helps address
these safety concerns.
Free Event - Please call 651-792-7845 to reserve a spot
Saturday, October 19
10:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon
Arden Hills City Hall - Parking Lot
Yoga For All Levels—Yoga Hot Dish
Whether you're a beginner, longtime practitioner or gym yogi
wanting to go deeper, these classes will provide you a
comprehensive work-out and work-in! YogaHotDish
founder Shaila Cunningham has 15+ years of teaching
experience and has worked with a variety of conditions and
populations. Her original style draws from a life
well-traveled, blending classical yoga with the latest “best
practices.” You'll emerge from each class restored and
renewed. High levels of customization and personal
attention will give you the confidence to explore the
mind-body connection on your own terms. Bring a sense of
humor, and open mind, and a yoga mat if you have one.
Straps, blocks, blankets provided. Some loaner mats will be
available at class. You must be able to get up off the floor
without assistance. Missed classes can be made up at other
locations. Visit www.yogahotdish.com for details.
The City of Arden Hills is offering a free yoga class on
September 19 at 9:30 am. All levels of experience
welcome.
$121resident, $132 non-resident, $15 drop-in, $10 students
with ID. Please register before first class or fill out a
registration form when you arrive.
19FAAYC00
Thursdays ♦ 6:00-7:15 pm
September 26-December 19
Arden Hills City Hall Community Room
Foot Care Clinic
A licensed and insured healthcare nurse will conduct a
foot care clinic by appointment only. Basic foot care provided by
Footworks includes: foot soak, removal of minor corns/calluses,
nail trim, and massage for circulation. Sign up for this activity in
person at the FRONT DESK at City Hall. Monday-Friday, 8:00 am
-4:30 pm, to select an appointment time. For additional
information, please call 651-792-7800.
$35 Per Session
1st Wednesday of the Month
Arden Hills City Hall
9
Participant’s Name: ___________________________________ Gender: _________ Date of Birth: __________________
Address: ________________________________________ City: _______________________ Zip: _________________
Home Phone: ______________________ Work Phone: _____________________ Cell Phone: _____________ _______
Please make check payable to the City of Arden Hills Totals: _________________
Refund Policy: No refunds are made except when a class is cancelled or approval is given by the Arden Hills Parks and Recreation Department. Partial
credit will be considered if cancellation is due to injury or serious illness. Refunds will be issued in the form of a credit voucher only and must be used within a year of
issue date. The registrant will be assessed a $5.00 administrative fee for all refund/voucher requests. Cancellations initiated by Parks & Recreation will not be as-
sessed the $5.00 fee.
Waiver of Liability: I, the undersigned, or my child, in consideration of being permitted to participate in the activity, do hereby agree to hold harmless the
City of Arden Hills and its employees and agents from any and all liability for personal injury which may result from participating in this activity. This waiver includes
any injuries which may result from the conditions of the playing field and any improvements thereto.
Tennessen Warning: The information requested on the registration form will be used to verify eligibility and determine staff, facility, and equipment needs.
You/Your child’s name, age, grade level, address, telephone number, and health information will be provided to city staff, volunteers, the city attorney, insurer, and
auditor.
Although you are not legally required to disclose this information, failure to do so will prevent you/your child from participating in the program.
Participant Signature: _____________________________________________________ Date: _______________
Print Participant Name: ____________________________________________________
Emergency Contact Name: ____________________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________
City of Arden Hills ‐ ADULT REGISTRATION FORM ‐ 1245 W Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN 55112
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: _______________________
Start Date: ___________ Fee: _________
Location: __________________________
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: ______________________
Start Date: ____________ Fee: ________
Location: __________________________
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: ______________________
Start Date: ____________ Fee: ________
Location: __________________________
Youth Shirt Sizes: (Leagues & Camps) YS (6/8) YM (10/12) YL (14/16) AS AM AL
City of Arden Hills ‐ Youth REGISTRATION FORM ‐ 1245 W Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN 55112
Participant’s Name: ___________________________________ Gender: _________ Date of Birth: __________________
Address: ________________________________________ City: _______________________ Zip: _________________
Home Phone: ______________________ Work Phone: _____________________ Cell Phone: _____________ _______
School: _____________________ Email: _______________________________Grade in 2019-2020 School Year: _______
Please make check payable to the City of Arden Hills Totals: _________________
Refund Policy: No refunds are made except when a class is cancelled or approval is given by the Arden Hills Parks and Recreation Department. Partial
credit will be considered if cancellation is due to injury or serious illness. Refunds will be issued in the form of a credit voucher only and must be used within a year of
issue date. The registrant will be assessed a $5.00 administrative fee for all refund/voucher requests. Cancellations initiated by Parks & Recreation will not be as-
sessed the $5.00 fee.
Waiver of Liability: I, the undersigned, or my child, in consideration of being permitted to participate in the activity, do hereby agree to hold harmless the
City of Arden Hills and its employees and agents from any and all liability for personal injury which may result from participating in this activity. This waiver includes
any injuries which may result from the conditions of the playing field and any improvements thereto.
Tennessen Warning: The information requested on the registration form will be used to verify eligibility and determine staff, facility, and equipment needs.
You/Your child’s name, age, grade level, address, telephone number, and health information will be provided to city staff, volunteers, the city attorney, insurer, and
auditor.
Although you are not legally required to disclose this information, failure to do so will prevent you/your child from participating in the program.
Parent/Guardian Signature: _____________________________________________________ Date: _______________
Print Parent/Guardian Name: ____________________________________________________
Special Requests: __________________________________________________________________________________
Please Help Coach! If you sign up to coach (for sport leagues, not classes) your child’s sport registration is free. (One child per team coached.)
I will help coach. Sport_______________________ Name_______________________________________ Phone#________________________
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: _______________________
Start Date: ___________ Fee: _________
Location: __________________________
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: ______________________
Start Date: ____________ Fee: ________
Location: __________________________
Activity Name: _____________________
Activity Code: ______________________
Start Date: ____________ Fee: ________
Location: __________________________
10
REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION
Confirmations will be issued only by request. Online confirmation is automatic.
Mailed Confirmation:
Include a self-addressed, stamped envelope with your registration form.
Electronic Confirmation:
Include your email address and request this on your registration form.
PHOTO/VIDEO DISCLAIMER
The City of Arden Hills may periodically take pictures or videotapes of participants while
they are engaged in programs, activities, special events, enjoying our parks or other
facilities. Please note that these photos may appear in city brochures and publications,
local newspapers, local cable television and/or on the city web page. If you or your family
members do not wish to be photographed or published, you must give written notice.
Refund Policy: No refunds are made except when a class is cancelled or approval is
given by the Arden Hills Parks and Recreation Department. Partial credit will be considered if
cancellation is due to injury or serious illness. Refunds will be issued in the form of a credit
voucher only and must be used within a year of issue date. The registrant will be assessed a
$5.00 administrative fee for all refund/voucher requests. Cancellations initiated by Parks &
Recreation will not be assessed the $5.00 fee.
REGISTER EARLY!
Waiting until the last minute to register can cause class cancellations–please register early!
Go to:
www.cityofardenhills.org
(Parks & Recreation/Program
Registration)
MAIL IN
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: 651-792-7800
IN PERSON
During City Hall hours 8:00 am
thru 4:30 pm, Monday-Friday
unless otherwise noted.
DROP BOX
Located on the wall by the
main entrance, registrations
can be dropped off here during
non-business hours.
REGISTRATION IS EASY!
REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION
Confirmations will be issued only by request. Online confirmation is automatic.
Mailed Confirmation:
Include a self-addressed, stamped envelope with your registration form.
Electronic Confirmation:
Include your email address and request this on your registration form.
PHOTO/VIDEO DISCLAIMER
The City of Arden Hills may periodically take pictures or videotapes of participants while
they are engaged in programs, activities, special events, enjoying our parks or other
facilities. Please note that these photos may appear in city brochures and publications,
local newspapers, local cable television and/or on the city web page. If you or your family
members do not wish to be photographed or published, you must give written notice.
Refund Policy: No refunds are made except when a class is cancelled or approval is
given by the Arden Hills Parks and Recreation Department. Partial credit will be considered if
cancellation is due to injury or serious illness. Refunds will be issued in the form of a credit
voucher only and must be used within a year of issue date. The registrant will be assessed a
$5.00 administrative fee for all refund/voucher requests. Cancellations initiated by Parks &
Recreation will not be assessed the $5.00 fee.
REGISTER EARLY!
Waiting until the last minute to register can cause class cancellations–please register early!
Go To:
www.cityofardenhills.org
(Parks & Recreation/Program
Registration)
MAIL IN
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: 651-792-7800
IN PERSON
During City Hall hours 8:00 am
thru 4:30 pm, Monday-Friday
unless otherwise noted.
DROP BOX
Located on the wall by the
main entrance, registrations
can be dropped off here during
non-business hours.
REGISTRATION IS EASY!
ONLINE
ONLINE
11
MAP
12
Office Hours
Monday–Friday, 8:00 am–4:30 pm
(unless otherwise indicated)
Phone Number
651-792-7800
Fax Number
651-634-5137
Mailing Address
Arden Hills City Hall
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Parks & Recreation Mission
Statement
The Arden Hills Parks & Recreation
Department is dedicated to serving the
people of Arden Hills by providing a
comprehensive, well maintained system
of parks, trails, facilities and open spaces,
and a balanced, well organized program
of affordable recreational activities.
Parks & Recreation Staff
Sara Knoll, Parks & Recreation Coordinator
Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer
Parks, Trails and Recreation
Committee (PTRC)
Rich Straumann, Committee Chair
Paul Beggin, Committee Member
Dan Dietz, Committee Member
Terry Finlay, Committee Member
Tim Nelson, Committee Member
Nancy O’Malley, Committee Member
Harold Petersen, Committee Member
John Van Valkenburg, Committee Member
Mayor David Grant, Council Liaison
Thank you for supporting
Arden Hills Parks &
Recreation!
Athletic Association Information
Baseball Shoreview Area Youth Baseball
www.sayb.org
Basketball Mounds View Basketball Association
www.moundsviewbasketball.com
Football Mounds View Youth Football League
www.moundsviewyouthfootball.org
Hockey Mounds View Hockey Association
www.mvhockey.org
Soccer North Suburban Soccer Association
www.nssasoccer.org
Softball Mounds View Softball Association
www.mvsafastpitch.org
OFFICE
INFORMATION
ECR-WSS
PRST STD
U.S. Postage
PAID
Twin Cities, MN
Permit No. 1962
RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER
Arden Hills City Hall
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
We’re on the
Web!
www.cityofardenhills.org
Follow us on
Follow us on
Recreation fees by month
Year 2018 * Does not include full time employees
34730 34781 34782 34790 34791
Playground Adult Youth After School Special Events TOTAL Expenses Temp EE TOTAL
JAN 730.00 (540.00) 1,575.00 1,765.00 995.61 - 995.61
FEB 3,010.00 2,690.92 1,086.00 265.00 216.00 7,267.92 581.00 636.35 1,217.35
MAR 7,102.00 6,539.75 7,899.00 2,330.00 672.00 24,542.75 9,551.39 682.91 10,234.30
APR 6,276.00 1,653.00 11,408.00 4,928.00 228.00 24,493.00 4,161.86 412.84 4,574.70
MAY 3,769.00 515.00 4,297.00 2,715.00 11,296.00 7,634.36 485.23 8,119.59
JUN 2,452.00 1,310.00 2,019.00 65.00 5,846.00 5,128.68 9,967.20 15,095.88
JUL 1,432.00 325.00 6,325.00 35.00 8,117.00 10,825.31 11,163.74 21,989.05
AUG (45.00) 1,835.75 1,863.00 1,830.00 5,483.75 10,115.56 7,653.80 17,769.36
SEPT 16.00 794.00 43.00 4,437.00 5,290.00 8,752.51 82.62 8,835.13
OCT 690.00 1,207.00 175.00 240.00 2,312.00 3,720.69 154.95 3,875.64
NOV 868.00 1,941.00 2,770.00 245.00 5,824.00 7,607.38 772.59 8,379.97
DEC 1,387.00 1,215.00 2,755.00 490.00 5,847.00 8,815.92 734.71 9,550.63
YEAR TOTAL 108,084.42 77,890.27 32,746.94 110,637.21
Year 2019
34730 34781 34782 34790 34791
Playground Adult Youth After School Special Events TOTAL Expenses Temp EE TOTAL
JAN 806.00 (233.00) 2,070.00 2,643.00 629.35 1,257.90 1,887.25
FEB 530.00 2,760.24 101.00 35.00 3,426.24 625.74 532.39 1,158.13
MAR 7,136.00 4,521.25 7,736.00 2,585.00 368.00 22,346.25 7,323.26 1,776.23 9,099.49
APR 3,994.00 1,905.25 8,805.00 11,659.50 744.00 27,107.75 4,249.82 193.77 4,443.59
MAY 3,685.00 690.00 4,208.00 455.00 9,038.00 6,204.15 287.43 6,491.58
JUN 2,289.00 1,635.00 3,417.00 7,341.00 18,529.20 5,543.12 24,072.32
JUL 475.00 280.00 7,397.00 390.00 8,542.00 4,739.23 7,639.54 12,378.77
AUG (90.00) 1,203.00 1,122.00 2,705.00 4,940.00 12,562.83 6,309.26 18,872.09
SEPT 1,104.00 373.00 3,440.00 120.00 5,037.00 2,682.19 247.60 2,929.79
OCT 344.00 158.00 550.00 180.00 1,232.00 185.58 87.20 272.78
NOV 584.00 637.00 1,930.00 215.00 3,366.00 2,125.25 530.66 2,655.91
DEC 976.00 871.00 2,305.00 180.00 4,332.00 12,141.89 (2,261.64) 9,880.25
YEAR TOTAL 99,351.24 71,998.49 22,143.46 94,141.95
Year 2020
34730 34781 34782 34790 34791
Playground Adult Youth After School Special Events TOTAL Expenses Temp EE TOTAL
JAN 1,144.00 175.00 1,785.00 3,104.00 429.48 50.86 480.34
FEB 1,640.00 1,900.75 980.00 585.00 5,105.75 1,050.01 458.19 1,508.20
MAR 5,495.00 48.75 2,726.00 (136.00) 8,133.75 1,890.78 - 1,890.78
APR (90.00) 132.00 42.00 4,545.88 345.97 4,891.85
MAY (7,135.00) (500.00) (3,438.00) (11,073.00) 2,388.02 2,388.02
JUN (1.00) 350.00 349.00 50.79 50.79
JUL - -
AUG - -
SEPT - -
OCT - -
NOV - -
DEC - -
YEAR TOTAL 5,661.50 10,354.96 855.02 11,209.98
RECREATION FEE REVENUE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT B
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM – 1F
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
July 20, 2020
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Council Tracker Update
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
The Council should provide further direction on items presented on the Council Request Tracker.
Background
City Council will receive a verbal update on items the Council has previously directed staff to
research and/or bring forward.
Discussion
N/A
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachments
N/A