Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-25-21-R
APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES Public Inquiry Response From January 11, 2021 City Council Meeting Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Twin Cities North Chamber Of Commerce Update John Connelly, TCNCC President MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF STAFF COMMENTS COVID -19 Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 11, 2021 Regular City Council 01 -11 -21 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -004 Approving Plans And Specs And Authorizing Ad For Bids –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvement Project Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -005 Accepting A Donation From The Arden Hills Foundation For Installation Of Park Benches Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release Agreement –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives l Resolution 2021 -006 for a Conditional Use Permit l Ordinance 2021 -001 Amending Chapter 13, Zoning Code, Section 1320.085, Subd. 5 and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Steve Scott Regular City Council Agenda January 25, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81923947119 This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 3.A. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 9.B. Documents: 10. 10.A. Documents: 10.B. Documents: 11. 12. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 11, 2021 City Council MeetingTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Twin Cities North Chamber Of Commerce Update John Connelly, TCNCC President MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF STAFF COMMENTS COVID -19 Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 11, 2021 Regular City Council 01 -11 -21 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -004 Approving Plans And Specs And Authorizing Ad For Bids –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvement Project Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -005 Accepting A Donation From The Arden Hills Foundation For Installation Of Park Benches Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release Agreement –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives l Resolution 2021 -006 for a Conditional Use Permit l Ordinance 2021 -001 Amending Chapter 13, Zoning Code, Section 1320.085, Subd. 5 and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda January 25, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81923947119This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 9.B. Documents: 10. 10.A. Documents: 10.B. Documents: 11. 12. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 11, 2021 City Council MeetingTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSTwin Cities North Chamber Of Commerce UpdateJohn Connelly, TCNCC President MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 11, 2021 Regular City Council01-11 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -004 Approving Plans And Specs And Authorizing Ad For Bids –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvement ProjectTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -005 Accepting A Donation From The Arden Hills Foundation For Installation Of Park Benches Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release Agreement –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives l Resolution 2021 -006 for a Conditional Use Permit l Ordinance 2021 -001 Amending Chapter 13, Zoning Code, Section 1320.085, Subd. 5 and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda January 25, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81923947119This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents: 7.C. Documents: 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 9.B. Documents: 10. 10.A. Documents: 10.B. Documents: 11. 12. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 11, 2021 City Council MeetingTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSTwin Cities North Chamber Of Commerce UpdateJohn Connelly, TCNCC President MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 11, 2021 Regular City Council01-11 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -004 Approving Plans And Specs And Authorizing Ad For Bids –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvement ProjectTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -005 Accepting A Donation From The Arden Hills Foundation For Installation Of Park BenchesJoe Vaughan, Recreation ProgrammerTodd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSPlanning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFPlanning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFATTACHMENT K.PDFNEW BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -021 –Conditional Use Permit And Easement Release Agreement –2 Pine Tree Drive Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Planning Case 20 -022 –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives l Resolution 2021 -006 for a Conditional Use Permit l Ordinance 2021 -001 Amending Chapter 13, Zoning Code, Section 1320.085, Subd. 5 and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance Mike Mrosla, Community Develoment Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda January 25, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81923947119This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:8.9.9.A.Documents:9.B.Documents:10. 10.A. Documents: 10.B. Documents: 11. 12. Page 1 of 1 RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Inquiry Response from January 11, 2021 City Council meeting Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. DATE: January 25, 2021 TO: Mayor Grant and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce Update Council Should Consider N/A Background/Discussion Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce President John Connelly will provide an update at the January 25 Council meeting. Attached is an informational flyer regarding the Chamber’s membership. Attachments Attachment A – Membership Flyer PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS – 4A MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 5A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 25, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. Approved: January 25, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2021 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Note: On March 20th, the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021 Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; Community Development Manager/City Planner Mike Mrosla; and City Clerk Julie Hanson via telephone City Attorney Joel Jamnik 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Gregg Larson, 3377 North Snelling Avenue, discussed Claims and Payroll with the Council. He drew the Council’s attention to Page 2 of Claims and Payroll. He requested more explanation be given regarding the payments made by the City to ensure both the Council and the public understand how the City is spending its money. Councilmember Holden stated there were other items on Claims and Payroll that did not have a high level of clarity. She questioned if all items should be further clarified. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 2 Mr. Larson asked that all items on Claims and Payroll have enough information that the general public can understand how City funds are being spent. Mayor Grant reported City staff would work to make this clearer for the Council and general public. Steve Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, stated a few years ago the City redid Siems Court. He reported when this work was completed the entrance to Lake Johanna Boulevard was narrowed. He stated this has become a hazard when there is snow and ice. He explained a car went off the road already this winter. He encouraged the City to reconsider the safety of vehicle traffic at this intersection. Mayor Grant requested Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom report back on this item at the Council’s next meeting. He also requested the Public Works Department pay special attention to the snow and ice at this intersection. 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES A. Public Inquiry Response from December 14, 2020 City Council Meeting Finance Director Bauman provided a brief update on staff’s response to the public inquiry from the December 14, 2020 City Council meeting. Councilmember Holden requested staff provide more detailed information regarding escrows and which project or Planning Case the escrow correlates to. Finance Director Bauman reported she would talk with her Accounting Analyst to ensure this level of detail was included in the future. She explained that all line items regarding escrows were the City simply returning funds to an applicant for a project and the City was not expending any of its own funds. Mayor Grant asked if the Council wanted to further discuss this matter at a future work session. Councilmember Scott did not believe this would be necessary. Mayor Grant requested staff speak with Springbrook to see if they could alter the number of lines available for Claims and Payroll information. Finance Director Bauman indicated she would ask the question. 4. PUBLIC PRESENTATION A. Recognition of Re-Elected City Councilmembers Brenda Holden and Dave McClung Mayor Grant reported Councilmembers Brenda Holden and Dave McClung have been re-elected to serve four-year terms (2021-2024). Generally, the Oath of Office would be given at an in- person Council meeting; however, due to COVID-19 precautions and Council meetings currently ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 3 being held virtually, it was deemed more practical to swear in each Councilmember separately while still meeting statute requirements. On Tuesday, January 5, 2021, the Oath of Office was administered by the City Clerk to Councilmember Holden and Councilmember McClung at City Hall, satisfying the “sight and sound” requirement of State law. Councilmember Holden thanked her husband for his support and understanding. She stated she was proud and humbled to serve the City of Arden Hills again for the next four years. Councilmember McClung stated he was looking forward to working with the Council for the next four years. He explained he appreciated how well the Council works together. He thanked the residents of Arden Hills for their support and for returning him to the City Council. He reported he has appreciated the phone calls and emails he has received from residents. He stated 2020 was an interesting year and he was looking forward to all the positive things that would occur in 2021. Mayor Grant congratulated Councilmember Holden and Councilmember McClung on their reelections. 5. STAFF COMMENTS A. COVID-19 Update City Administrator Perrault provided the Council with an update on how the City was responding to COVID-19. He encouraged residents to visit the City’s website for the most current and up to date information regarding COVID-19. He reported the Minnesota Department of Health and CDC also had websites with current guidelines and recommendations. He explained the City of Arden Hills remains in a peacetime state of emergency and City Hall will remain closed until further notice. He indicated City staff remains operational and can be reached via phone or email. He reported the governor recently announced the rollback of certain COVID mitigation measures. He stated further information regarding these rollbacks were available on the City’s website and State of Minnesota’s website. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 23, 2020, Special City Council Work Session B. November 23, 2020, Regular City Council C. November 23, 2020, Special City Council Executive Session (Closed) D. December 14, 2020, Regular City Council E. December 21, 2020, City Council Work Session F. December 21, 2020, Special City Council Councilmember Holden noted she had one change to the December 21, 2020 worksession meeting minutes and this change was presented to the City Clerk. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 4 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the November 23, 2020, Special City Council Work Session meeting minutes, November 23, 2020, Regular City Council meeting minutes, November 23, 2020, Special City Council Executive Session (Closed) meeting minutes, December 14, 2020, Regular City Council meeting minutes, December 21, 2020, City Council Work Session meeting minutes; and December 21, 2020, Special City Council meeting minutes as amended. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Adopt Resolution 2021-001 – Relating to the 2021 Organization of the City of Arden Hills C. Motion to Adopt Resolution 2021-002 – Relating to the Appointments to the Commission and Committees of the City D. Motion to Approve Payment No. 1 to Air Express, Inc. – City Hall HVAC Replacement Project E. Motion to Approve Ramsey County Shared Service Agreement for Erosion and Sediment Control Inspections MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 8. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 10. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution 2021-003 – Approving a Variance at 3493 Siems Court – Planning Case 20-017 Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated at the October 7, 2020 Planning Commission meeting the Applicant requested a variance to build a 120 square foot accessory storage structure that encroached eighteen (18) inches into the Shore Impact Zone of Lake Johanna. The proposed structure exceeded the eight (8) foot height limitation at ten (10) feet, six (6) inches. The Planning Commission voted to table the request to allow the Applicant to revise their plans to better conform to the Shoreland Ordinance provisions. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 5 Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the applicant took the Planning Commissions comments under consideration and submitted revised plans for a smaller structure that would not encroach into the Shore Impact Zone. The Applicant is now proposing to construct a structure that is nine and a half (9.5) feet tall and ninety-three and a half (93.5) square feet in size. However, the proposed structure still required a variance due to the proposed height and area that exceeded current ordinance standards. At their December 9, 2020 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed and discussed this application. The Planning Commission voted 4-3 to approve the planning case. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the Plan Evaluation, Variance Requirements and offered the following Findings of Fact: 1. City Staff received a land use application for a request to build an accessory structure for storage at the Subject Property 3493 Siems Court. 2. Storage of personal items is a permitted use for an accessory structure in the R-1 Single Family Residential District. 3. The Subject Property has a steep downward slope in the rear yard that prevents the Applicant from building on much of the site. 4. The Subject Property meets the minimum lot size, width, and length requirements for the R-1 District. 5. The Applicant is requesting flexibility with the maximum height and size restrictions for an accessory storage shed located within the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) setback requirement for Lake Johanna. 6. The rear yard setback requirement for a proposed accessory structure is determined by the OWHL of Lake Johanna. 7. The proposed structure is located 25.2 feet within the OHWL setback from Lake Johanna which is 50 feet. 8. The proposed storage structure would be located outside the Shore Impact Zone of Lake Johanna. 9. One (1) storage shed is permitted with the OHWL setback requirement of Lake Johanna as long as it does not exceed 64 square feet in size and eight (8) feet in height and is not within the Shore Impact Zone. 10. The proposed structure exceeds the height at nine (9) feet six (6) inches tall and exceeds the area dimension at 93.5 square feet. 11. The proposed structure would otherwise conform to all other requirements and standards of the R-1 district. 12. A variance may be granted if enforcement of a provision in the zoning ordinance would cause the landowner practical difficulties. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Case 20-017 for a Variance at 3493 Siems Court, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by following conditions: 1. A Zoning Permit for an accessory structure shall be issued prior to commencement of construction. 2. The exterior materials of the proposed addition shall be consistent or complementary in color, texture and quality with those visible on the existing structure. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 6 3. The Applicant shall add landscaped screening to assist in screening the structure from adjacent properties. Planning staff shall review and approve the screening plan prior to the issuance of Zoning Permit. 4. The proposed accessory structure shall conform to all other standards and regulations in the City Code. Councilmember Holden reported there were a lot of steep properties around Lake Johanna, she questioned why this property was unique. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this finding was provided by the applicant. He indicated the applicant believes the topography of his lot was unique when compared to others. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to hear from staff on why this property was unique. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented there were other properties with similar characteristics. Councilmember McClung requested information regarding how the City’s ordinance compared to neighboring communities or the DNR. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported staff reviewed adjacent community’s codes and noted Shoreview has a maximum of 250 square feet, Roseville has a maximum of 250 square feet and New Brighton requires residents to meet accessory structure and setback requirements. He noted the model ordinance from the DNR sets a maximum of 250 square feet with a note that municipalities may set a size they deem necessary. Mayor Grant indicated the City has a standard of 64 feet and questioned if this was the right standard for the City to have. He reported the 64 square feet would allow for an eight foot by eight foot shed. He commented this was not a lot of space. Councilmember Holden explained properties on lakes are allowed to have a second storage shed, while other properties in Arden Hills are not. She asked if lake property owners could have a concrete slab next to a shed to allow them to chain a canoe or kayak to the shed. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented this would be allowed. Mayor Grant asked if lakeshore properties are allowed to have two accessory structures. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was allowed. He stated one structure could be located within the setback and the other had to be outside the setback area. Councilmember McClung explained he visited this property and others along the lake. He commented after weighing the pros and cons, he could see both sides of the equation. He agreed that 64 square feet was quite small. He questioned if the Council should be considering this ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 7 variance and possibly setting a precedent versus taking public feedback and reevaluating the Shoreline Ordinance. He supported the Council taking another look at the Shoreline Ordinance. Mayor Grant stated the Council could move to table action on this item in order to further evaluate the Shoreline Ordinance. He questioned if the applicant could place a shed outside the OHWM. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla did not believe this would be possible given the topography of the lot. Councilmember Scott explained he visited this lot last summer. He noted the entire backyard was sloped and full of boulders. He did not anticipate a shed could be constructed on the slope/boulders. He asked what the dimensions were for a typical paddle board. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported paddle boards were generally 10 to 11 feet in length and were between 32 to 34 inches wide. Councilmember Scott stated this request was first presented to the Planning Commission in October and the request was for a 120 square foot foundation with a 10.5 foot high shed which had a volume of 1260 cubic feet. He indicated City ordinance allows for 512 cubic feet. He explained the revised request was for 982 cubic feet. He questioned if the exterior dimensions could be altered to fit within the 64 square foot foundation while still accommodating a full length paddle board. Mayor Grant reported kayaks were typically longer than paddle boards. He anticipated 11 feet would be what the City would want to shoot for. Councilmember Holden commented if a precedent was being set here, she did not want it done for just this property or just for a paddle board. She explained the Council should be taking into consideration all lakeshore properties. Mayor Grant apologized and stated that was not what he was getting at. He indicated the point he was getting to was that the property owner could build a second shed on the property for long boards or kayaks. Councilmember Holden questioned if a second shed could be built on the subject property. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated according to the applicant and due to the slope of the rear yard , this was the only suitable site in the rear yard for an accessory structure. Councilmember McClung indicated there was a retaining wall between the applicant and the neighbor to the south. He commented further on the slope to the north. He explained he did not see another location on the property that would accommodate an accessory structure. Councilmember Holden stated if this request were approved, a precedent could be set and another request could be made. She believed this request needed further consideration. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 8 Councilmember McClung explained he did not believe this case would set a precedent due to the severity of the topography of this property. He stated the next request would have to prove there was no other possible location for a shed except for within the OHWM. He indicated approving this request would only apply to properties with topographical concerns. He commented he supported the Council taking another look at the Shoreline Ordinance. Councilmember Scott stated the Planning Commission was divided on this issue, along with the neighbors. He explained one neighbor stated at the meeting that if this request were approved, he could foresee a flood of additional requests coming to the City. He indicated he was concerned about the precedent that would be set if this variance were approved. Councilmember Holden discussed the size of sheds that were allowed on residential properties in Arden Hills. She supported the Council revisiting this issue as a whole. Mayor Grant agreed the Council should revisit this issue. Councilmember Holmes stated she wasn’t aware of the rule regarding a second accessory structure. He requested further information as to the size of the structures that were allowed for lakeshore properties. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported lakeshore properties were allowed to have a 64 square foot shed within the OHWM setback and could have one additional structure and these structures cannot exceed 728 square feet. Councilmember Holmes agreed that the Shoreline Ordinance should be further reviewed by the Council. Mayor Grant commented one of the options available to the Council would be to table action on the request. Councilmember Holden opposed tabling action. She stated depending on how the Council moves forward with this matter, the applicant may have to submit new plans for the shed. For this reason, she recommended the request not be tabled. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated this was the case and noted if the Council amended the Shoreline Ordinance to allow for up to 100 square feet, the applicant would withdraw their application as the proposal would meet ordinance. The applicant could then submit plans for a shed up to 100 square feet or request a new variance for a shed over 100 square feet. Mayor Grant asked if staff could work with the applicant on an extension. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained he could work with the applicant on this matter, noting the 60 day timeline expires on January 23, 2021. Mayor Grant inquired if the Council could take this item up in the next 60 days. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 9 Councilmember Holden did not believe this would be enough time. Councilmember Scott stated he was leaning towards denying the variance request at this time. He supported the item being tabled to allow for more time to review the request. Councilmember McClung anticipated if this item were to go to a vote this evening the variance request would be denied. He feared that 60 days would not be enough time to revise the Shoreline Ordinance. He asked if the applicant would be willing to withdraw his application with the understanding the Council would be reviewing the Shoreline Ordinance. Councilmember Holmes agreed with Councilmember McClung. She commented if the request were denied the applicant could not come back for six months. She noted the applicant could build a structure that did not require a variance. She indicated the applicant would be allowed the most amount of flexibility or opportunity if the request were withdrawn and resubmitted after the Council could review the Shoreline Ordinance. Mayor Grant questioned if the applicant could request an additional 60 day extension after the first extension expired. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was allowed. He stated it would be up to the applicant how long they wanted to allow the extensions to occur. He appreciated the Council’s conversation and believed the applicant would be supportive of an extension to allow the Council to further discuss this matter. Kye Samuelson, 3493 Siems Court, thanked the Council for their consideration. He understood this request had a lot of nuances. He stated he had a hard time understanding all of the mechanics behind tabling versus withdrawing. He explained he would rely on staff for a recommendation on how best to move forward. He agreed the variables around square footage should be addressed by the City. He discussed how he treats his property with a community focus. He understood the Council would want to reduce the risk of getting buried with future requests while using this as a learning case. He stated he could support taking a long term approach to his request. He thanked the Council for taking his best interests to heart and noted he could support an extension or withdrawal of his request. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla recommended the item be tabled to allow the Council to discuss the size and scale of accessory structures within the OHWM setback area. He anticipated this would be a three to four month process. Councilmember Holden supported the item being tabled. Councilmember Holmes concurred. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to table action on Planning Case 20-017 to a future City Council meeting. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 10 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Scott congratulated and thanked all volunteer Commission members for their service to the City of Arden Hills. He reported Paul Vijums would be serving as the Planning Commission Chair for 2021, Dan Erickson would continue as Chair of the Economic Development Commission and John Van Valkenburg would serve as the Chair of the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC). He thanked Nick Gehrig for serving as the Chair of the Planning Commission and wished him well in the future. He thanked Rich Straumann and Nancy O’Malley for their service to the community as members of the PTRC. Councilmember Scott congratulated Councilmember Holden and Councilmember McClung on their reelection to the Arden Hills City Council. Councilmember Scott reported he attended a virtual Town Hall meeting last week with State legislators. He expressed concern with how legislators were being targeted by extremist groups. Councilmember Scott commended the State of Minnesota for its election integrity and for the tremendous voter turnout year after year. He commented further on the voting process and stated he was proud of the State’s entire election process. Councilmember Holmes congratulated Councilmember Holden and Councilmember McClung on their reelection. Councilmember Holmes stated new perspective senior living was considered by the Planning Commission at their January meeting for the Bethel Pine Tree Drive property. She encouraged the Council to contact staff if interested in reviewing the materials board. Councilmember Holmes commented the Council received a response from the County regarding the letter that was sent concerning Lake Johanna Boulevard. She requested this response be discussed at a future worksession meeting. Councilmember Holden supported the Council further discussion the letter from the County. Mayor Grant requested staff place the letter from the County on a future worksession agenda. He asked that this letter also be sent to Rich Stroman and John Van Valkenburg. Mayor Grant stated on Wednesday he would be attending a virtual meeting where he would be informed on the Federal COVID status. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 11, 2021 11 ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:30 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor CONSENT ITEM 7A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider A. Approve Claims and Payroll or B. Reject Claims and Payroll Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact NA Attachments 2021 Payroll #2 ……………………………………………………………. $99,631.86 Total Payroll $99,631.86 Paid Claims--- 12/25/2020 through 1/15/2021 (Check Nos. 49799-49846 and ACH Checks) ……………………………... $983,704.24 Total Accounts Payable $983,704.24 Total Claims $1,083,336.10 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 2 CHECKS DATED:01/22/21 Biweekly:01/02/21 -01/15/21 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,836.71 EFT SIT 3,132.12 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,837.84 EFT FICA Medicare 1,131.46 EFT TOTAL TAXES 15,938.13 Health Premium 1,128.38 A/P Check* Dental Premium 241.04 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb.0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1,369.42 HSA Health Saving 303.33 Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 7,409.22 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 512.05 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4%484.59 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 8,709.19 PERA 4,763.23 EFT ICMA 2,826.59 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 750.00 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 8,954.22 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 0.00 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 132.94 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 35.70 A/P Check* UNUM 19.51 A/P Check* AFLAC 22.76 EFT TOTAL VOLUNTARY 382.91 Total Employee Deductions 35,353.87 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 52,403.13 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 87,757.00 Plus City Paid Benefit 11,874.86 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 99,631.86 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 87,757.00 Less Total FSA 1,369.42 Less Total H.SA 8,709.19 Less Voluntary Ins 58.46 Plus ICMA Employer 409.50 Net P/R Subject to FICA 78,029.43 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,837.84 FICA Medicare @ 1.45%1,131.46 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 5,969.30 CITY BENEFIT 4,837.84 1,131.46 0.00 409.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,496.06 5,905.56 0.00 Accounts Payable User: Printed: pang.silseth 1/20/2021 5:15 PM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription ACH001 US BANK 12/31/2020ACH ARVIM122020 BEST BUY- Wall Charger 96.63 BAUMG122020 AMZN MKTP US*SX9R41OS3 AM-Books 41.39 BAUMG122020 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN-Hazelnut Rental-Dec 582.00 BAUMG122020 AMZN MKTP US*SX9R41OS3 AM-Headset 108.08 BAUMG122020 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN-Hazelnut Rental-Nov 1,520.47 BEEBT122020 BEISSWENGERS-Protectant Wipes 19.30 CHRIM122020 THE HOME DEPOT #2828-Supplies 17.10 CHRIM122020 NORTHERN TOOL+EQUIP-Supplies 35.42 CHRIM122020 BROCK WHITE 180-Concrete Mix 310.36 GEBAM122020 MENARDS BLAINE MN-Binoculars 35.34 HANSJ122020 NNA SERVICES LLC-Notary Renewal JH 35.36 HANSJ122020 WALGREENS #3293-Postage Stamps 22.00 HANSJ122020 DAVANNIS #10 ARDEN HILLS-CC Worksession 62.91 HANSJ122020 ANNAS HALLMARK SHOP-Holiday Cards 16.06 HOLMF122020 TWIN CITIES NORTH CHAMBE-12/10 Meeting 20.00 MIKAT122020 COSTCO WHSE #1021-TV 381.16 MIKAT122020 MENARDS BLAINE MN-Supplies 10.69 MIKAT122020 APPLE.COM/BILL-iCloud 0.99 MROSM122020 TWIN CITIES NORTH CHAMBE-12/10 Meeting 25.00 PERRD122020 EB 2018 IBC BUILDING-Training 65.00 PERRD122020 JIMMY JOHNS - 1532 - 11/16 Meeting 101.64 REBATE122020 US BANK REBATE -120.93 WARDR122020 U OF M CONTLEARNING-Training 340.00 WARDR122020 U OF M CONTLEARNING-Training 385.00 4,110.97Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH001: ACH002 AFLAC 12/31/2020ACH 676179 Insurance Premiums- Dec 2020 45.52 45.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH002: ACH003 PITNEY BOWES INC 12/31/2020ACH 11232020 Nov Postage - Park-Rec brochure 682.42 11232020 Nov Postage - fee 19.99 702.41Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH003: ACH005 MINNESOTA REVENUE-SALES & USE TAX12/31/2020ACH 112020 November Sales/Use Tax -0.19 112020 November Sales/Use Tax 108.19 108.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH005: 4,966.90Total for 12/31/2020: 0192 GRAINGER INC 01/08/2021ACH 9751316994 electrical parts 308.26 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 9753117465 floodlight 130.00 438.26Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0243 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL-WASTE WATER01/08/2021ACH 1117737 Waste Water-January 70,596.57 70,596.57Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0243: 0319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 01/08/2021ACH 229722 Netmotion License-DS 578.00 578.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 01/08/2021ACH PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 361.31 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 40.95 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 313.14 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 35.49 750.89Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 01/08/2021ACH PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 36.99 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,968.66 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 259.88 PR 21-01 PR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 258.46 2,523.99Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0549 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC INC 01/08/2021ACH 222324-001 parts 16.75 16.75Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0549: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 01/08/2021ACH 261656 2021 PMP 40,910.50 40,910.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1363 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 01/08/2021ACH 10921 Leak Locate-4371 Arden Veiw Ct 302.18 302.18Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1363: 1785 ECOENVELOPES LLC 01/08/2021ACH 12021 January UB Postage 296.67 12021 January UB Postage 296.66 12021 January UB Postage 296.67 890.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1785: 2654 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC 01/08/2021ACH 4092 2021 ICON Support Agreement 3,595.00 3,595.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2654: 4889 COMMUNITY FOOTWORKS 01/08/2021ACH 1062021 January Foot Clinic 196.00 196.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 5587 CES IMAGING INC 01/08/2021ACH Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription INV122134 December Rental 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 7084 OMNISITE 01/08/2021ACH 76106 2021 Omni Advantage Annual Plan 7,221.00 7,221.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7084: FPTC FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY INC 01/08/2021ACH 25683 cabe/connector 461.10 461.10Total for this ACH Check for Vendor FPTC: TCCC TWIN CITIES NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE01/08/2021ACH 2020368 2021 Membership 475.00 475.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TCCC: TOII TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 01/08/2021ACH 10121 December Electrical Inspections 11,755.76 11,755.76Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TOII: ADVS ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC 01/08/202149799 44828 signs 41.90 41.90Total for Check Number 49799: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 01/08/202149800 393271 hardware supplies 10.76 10.76Total for Check Number 49800: CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 01/08/202149801 184503.1220 December Pension 1,224.96 1,224.96Total for Check Number 49801: 10450 CENTRO PRINT SOLUTIONS 01/08/202149802 222259 Tax Forms 88.95 88.95Total for Check Number 49802: 10276 CITY OF COON RAPIDS 01/08/202149803 13077 2020 sealcoating 1,790.30 1,790.30Total for Check Number 49803: 6562 DAVANNI'S 01/08/202149804 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 1,063.00 1,063.00Total for Check Number 49804: 6200 FLAHERTY'S ARDEN BOWL 01/08/202149805 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 3,565.00 3,565.00Total for Check Number 49805: 1757 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES 01/08/202149806 2021-00104 Refund tobacco lic overpayment 300.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 300.00Total for Check Number 49806: 3561 HRP ARDEN HILLS LLC 01/08/202149807 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 3,565.00 3,565.00Total for Check Number 49807: 8078 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION 01/08/202149808 2019-00395 partial permit refund 4,153.00 4,153.00Total for Check Number 49808: 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSURANCE01/08/202149809 NB4.0221 February Insurance 1,527.00 1,527.00Total for Check Number 49809: 10415 IUOE TRAINING CENTER 01/08/202149810 10521 2nd payment - training center agreement 2,080.00 2,080.00Total for Check Number 49810: 10401 JIMMIES OLD SOUTHERN BBQ SMOKEHOUSE01/08/202149811 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 1,063.00 1,063.00Total for Check Number 49811: 1055 KODIAK POWER SYSTEMS INC 01/08/202149812 KPS0642 Lift #11 repair 589.07 589.07Total for Check Number 49812: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC01/08/202149813 779 2021 Fire Contract-1st Half 328,200.38 328,200.38Total for Check Number 49813: AR-LEE1 STEVEN LEE 01/08/202149814 GE 2018-01079 Escrow Refund: GE 2018-01079, 4367 Lexington Ave 474.68 474.68Total for Check Number 49814: 5331 LHASA CAFE LLC 01/08/202149815 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 1,000.00 1,000.00Total for Check Number 49815: 0850 LINDEY'S PRIME STEAK HOUSE 01/08/202149816 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 1,832.50 1,832.50Total for Check Number 49816: 0422 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY01/08/202149817 10000112106 PBP Reimb. Old Snelling/Cty Rd E 1,375.00 1,375.00Total for Check Number 49817: 10451 NAMASTE INDIA INC 01/08/202149818 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 929.25 929.25Total for Check Number 49818: Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 01/08/202149819 315800012021 January Insurance 64.00 64.00Total for Check Number 49819: AR-O'ME3 O'MEARA CUSTOM HOMES 01/08/202149820 TCO 2018-01045 Escrow Refund: TCO 2018-01045, 3258 Katie Ln 10,000.00 10,000.00Total for Check Number 49820: 10402 ORCHID BAR & GRILL INC.01/08/202149821 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 2,987.50 2,987.50Total for Check Number 49821: 1074 PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE INC 01/08/202149822 82413 1652 Oak Ave tree removal 1,000.00 1,000.00Total for Check Number 49822: 3100 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS CO01/08/202149823 E0471136.1220 December Insurance 39.02 39.02Total for Check Number 49823: 6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 01/08/202149824 GL154938.0121 January Insurance 1,714.80 1,714.80Total for Check Number 49824: 6555 TKDA INC 01/08/202149825 2020004522 Trunk Watermain-October 1,453.88 2020004971 Trunk Watermain-November 2,128.49 3,582.37Total for Check Number 49825: 3099 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC-LITTLE CANADA01/08/202149826 A81434 hardware supplies 1,355.16 1,355.16Total for Check Number 49826: 10413 ULTEIG ENGINEERS INC 01/08/202149827 101439 Karth Lake Runoff-December 1,573.50 1,573.50Total for Check Number 49827: 4703 WELSCH'S BIG TEN TAVERN 01/08/202149828 122120 2021 Liquor License Reduction 2,987.50 2,987.50Total for Check Number 49828: 520,948.60Total for 1/8/2021: 0008 JOSEPH MOONEY 01/15/2021ACH 12302020 Clothing Reimbursement 125.73 125.73Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0008: 0243 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL-WASTE WATER01/15/2021ACH 1118214 Waste Water-February 70,596.57 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 70,596.57Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0243: 0285 XCEL ENERGY 01/15/2021ACH 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 1,483.82 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 1,489.78 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 1,987.42 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 1,568.36 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 249.32 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 49.57 713826198 11/11/20-12/14/20 952.47 7,780.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 01/15/2021ACH 229777 IT Support-January 6,803.72 6,803.72Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 0327 STAPLES INC 01/15/2021ACH 3464687660 Supplies 53.20 3464687660 Supplies 30.59 3464687661 Supplies 62.77 3464687662 Supplies 113.18 3464687663 Supplies 84.58 3465414393 Supplies 36.98 381.30Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 01/15/2021ACH M1191 December CC Minutes 561.00 561.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 01/15/2021ACH 262591 Lift Station 10 Rehab 2,570.00 2,570.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1223 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL - MAIN 01/15/2021ACH 3243579 Pest Control-January 71.59 71.59Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1223: 5173 BADGER METER 01/15/2021ACH 80066060 Q1 2021 Gateway Fees 270.00 270.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5173: 7501 KELLY & LEMMONS PA 01/15/2021ACH 54584 Prosecution-Decemter 3,276.00 3,276.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 01/15/2021ACH 1220-4142 Drinking Water Survey-Dec 698.00 698.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: ALPI ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 01/15/2021ACH 162202 December Newsletter 1,323.79 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1,323.79Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: BOND BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 01/15/2021ACH 60065 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Debt Svc 5,625.00 60065 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Debt Svc 30,000.00 60065 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Debt Svc 35,875.00 60065 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Debt Svc 180,000.00 61430 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Paying Agent Fee 64.00 61430 Revenue Bonds 2018A-Paying Agent Fee 411.00 251,975.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BOND: JOHC JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 01/15/2021ACH 1-100525278475 CH Boiler Repair 1,157.83 1,157.83Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: 10453 AIR EXPRESS INC 01/15/202149829 HVAC Pay 1 City Hall HVAC Replacement 14,200.00 HVAC Pay 1 City Hall HVAC Replacement -710.00 13,490.00Total for Check Number 49829: 1033 COMCAST 01/15/202149830 101030.0121 Service 1/3-2/2 118.35 101030.1220 Service 12/3-1/2 163.34 98681.0121 Service 1/5-2/4 109.71 391.40Total for Check Number 49830: DMLP DELL MARKETING LP 01/15/202149831 10451274541 Laptop-PW Locate Vehicle 1,467.21 1,467.21Total for Check Number 49831: 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSURANCE01/15/202149832 BP3.0221 February Insurance 10,120.00 10,120.00Total for Check Number 49832: 10452 INFRASTRCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICE01/15/202149833 50268-1 Professional Services 4,160.40 4,160.40Total for Check Number 49833: 0390 INT'L UNION OPERATING ENGINEERS-UNION DUES01/15/202149834 1200.0121 January Dues 280.00 280.00Total for Check Number 49834: 5138 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/15/202149835 1042021 2021 Worker's Compensation 43,091.00 43,091.00Total for Check Number 49835: 10362 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 01/15/202149836 INV8303388 Copier 12/25-1/24 117.82 INV8303388 Copier 12/25-1/24 20.79 138.61Total for Check Number 49836: 10448 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 01/15/202149837 Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 432653418 Copier Contract 12/25-1/25 35.36 432653418 Copier Contract 12/25-1/25 200.35 235.71Total for Check Number 49837: ASSM METRO CITIES 01/15/202149838 713 2021 Membership 4,029.00 4,029.00Total for Check Number 49838: 0801 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 01/15/202149839 3148082 Training 1,600.00 1,600.00Total for Check Number 49839: 10271 MN PEIP 01/15/202149840 1040433 February Insurance 8,995.66 8,995.66Total for Check Number 49840: 10373 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 01/15/202149841 6418.1220 Postage 1,000.00 1,000.00Total for Check Number 49841: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 01/15/202149842 EMCOM-008966 Fleet Support-December 24.96 EMCOM-009003 Dispatch-December 3,181.94 EMCOM-009020 CAD-December 616.26 PRRRV-001503 Truth in Taxation Notice 652.68 4,475.84Total for Check Number 49842: 0282 REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 01/15/202149843 0899-003653080 Recycling-December 8,181.00 0899-003657031 PW Waste Container-Dec 162.36 8,343.36Total for Check Number 49843: 6225 SAND CREEK EAP LLC 01/15/202149844 SDC1794-IN OAP Services-Dec 822.66 822.66Total for Check Number 49844: 10354 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS 01/15/202149845 1220572589 Pub Notice-PC 19-002 #403 36.12 1220572589 Pub Notice-Ord. 2021 Fee Schedule 20.64 1220572589 Public Hearing-UB/False Alarm 45.58 1220572589 Pub Notice-PC 20-022 #549 47.30 149.64Total for Check Number 49845: 6555 TKDA INC 01/15/202149846 2020005510 Trunk Watermain Assmt-Dec 7,406.98 7,406.98Total for Check Number 49846: 457,788.74Total for 1/15/2021: Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription Report Total (82 checks): 983,704.24 Page 9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2021 5:15 PM) Page 1 of 2 DATE: January 25, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Plans & Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $3,807,000 (2021 CIP) $3,908,000 (Pre-bid Estimate) PIR, Assessments, Water, Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Utilities Council Should Consider The City C ouncil is requested to consider adoption of Resolution 2021-004 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the 2021 Pavement Management Program Street and Utility Improvement Project. Background/Discussion On September 14, 2020, the City Council ordered preparation of plans and specifications for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement project within the Hazelnut Park residential neighborhood following a public hearing for the project. The proposed project includes replacement of portions of water main, repair of sanitary sewer, expansion of storm sewer, installation of curb and replacement of bituminous street and trail pavement along segments of Glenpaul Avenue, Edgewater Avenue, Jerrold Avenue and Prior Avenue located between New Brighton Road and Cleveland Avenue. The project plans and specifications are prepared and the project is ready for solicitation of construction bids. Adoption of Resolution 2021-004 will approve the plans and specification and order advertisement for bids for the 2021 PMP project. Bids would be received on February 24, 2021 and presented to the City Council on March 8, 2021 with an appropriate resolution to proceed to an assessment hearing for the project before awarding the construction contact. This schedule will allow for contract award on April 12 with construction starting in May 2021. The final construction completion date is October 29, 2021. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-004 as provided in Attachment A. CONSENT ITEM – 7B MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 The final plan set and specifications consist of 476 pages. Full copies of these documents are on file and available upon request to the City Clerk or by downloading from the project webpage prior to the start of bidding. Selected plan sheets illustrating the project improvements are provided in Attachment B. Budget Impact The estimated total project cost and funding sources based on the final plans and specifications are summarized below. Total Estimated Expenses Construction: $ 3,238,000 Engineering Design: $ 180,000 Construction Mgmt: $ 170,000 Gen Admin & Legal: $ 85,000 Finance & Interest: $ 60,000 Material Testing: $ 10,000 Const. Contingency: $ 165,000 TOTAL ESTIMATE: $ 3,908,000 Total Estimated Funding PIR Fund: $ 1,215,300 Special Assessments: $ 821,600 Water Utility: $ 811,500 Sanitary Sewer Utility: $ 530,000 Surface Water Utility $ 529.600 TOTAL FUNDING: $ 3,908,000 The amounts listed above are estimates based on the current opinion of probable construction costs. Final total expenses and funding amounts will be revised and presented to the City Council upon receipt of construction bids. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2021-004 Attachment B: Project Plan Sheets 1 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-004 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2020-037, the city engineer has prepared plans and specifications for Improvement Project No. PW-21-0100, 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project, the improvement of Glenpaul Avenue, Edgewater Avenue, Jerrold Avenue and Prior Avenue located between New Brighton Road and Cleveland Avenue. The plans and specifications have been presented to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisements shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be received by the clerk until 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, at which time they will be publicly opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on March 8, 2021, in the council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during the consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the city for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY 2021. ________________________________ Mayor Attest: ______________________________ City Clerk $WWDFKPHQW% Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 7C MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Accepting Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation for Park Benches Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A $2,479.00 Arden Hills Foundation Council Should Consider The City Council is requested to consider adoption of Resolution 2021-005 Accepting a Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation in the amount of $2,479.00 for installation of four park benches. Background The Arden Hills Foundation has been established as a 501c3 organization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens, cities are authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefits of recreational services. The Arden Hills Foundation has offered to donate $2,479 to the City of Arden Hills for purchase of four park benches within the community. The benches are proposed along the City’s trail system at the following general locations as shown on Attachment A. 1. Cummings Park north of athletic fields 2. Public trail northeast of Colleen Avenue 3. Perry Park near the dog park 4. Hazelnut Park along trail system. The four benches would be 6-ft long recycled plastic Malibu bench model with plaques acknowledging the donation from the Arden Hills Foundation. A resolution accepting the donation is provided in Attachment B. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact The donation amount of $2,479 is expected to cover the full amount to purchase the benches and plaques. City Public Works staff would provide labor and equipment to install the benches. Attachments Attachment A: Bench Location Map Attachment B: Resolution 2021-005 Accepting Donation Attachment C: Donation Letter !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( Tony Schmidt Regional Park Crepeau Nature Preserve Hazelnut Park Ingerson Park Freeway Park Tony Schmidt Regional Park Sampson Park Lindey's Park Charles Perry Park Tony Schmidt Regional Park Valentine Park Floral Park Royal Hills Park Cummings Park Arden Manor Park Johanna Marsh Arden Oaks Park Community Gardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna Valentine Lake Round Lake Sun Fish Lake Bench Locations 0 1,500 Feet Ü !( !( !(!( !( !( Attachment A To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-005 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE ARDEN HILLS FOUNDATION WHEREAS, Arden Hills (“City”) is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens, and is specifically authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefit of recreational services pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17; and WHEREAS, The following entity has offered to contribute the cash amount for park benches as set forth below to the city: Name of Donor Amount Arden Hills Foundation $2,479.00 WHEREAS, All such donations have been contributed to assist the City in the establishment and operation of recreational facilities and programs either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation offered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, THAT: 1. The donation described above is accepted and shall be used to establish recreational facilities either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the City’s receipt of the donor’s donation. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021. _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-021 2 Pine Tree North - CUP Release Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC HEARING – 9A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 25, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 20-021 – Public Hearing Applicant: Lake Johanna Fire Department Property Location: 2 Pine Tree North Drive Request: Easement and Conditional Use Permit Release Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 20-021 for an application to release an easement and conditional use permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North. The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 10A. Background In 2013 Bethel University acquired the Country Financial facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive. The property consisted of three (3) parcels that total approximately 43 acres. The subject property is located within the B-2 General Business District, where higher educational uses are permitted by Conditional Use Permit. At its November 25, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a CUP for Bethel University to use the existing facility as higher education. The subject property also has an existing easement for public pedestrian and bicycle pathway purposes that was recorded on June 9, 1978. When the subject parcel develops in the future staff will require necessary easements be placed at that time. Bethel University has recently received approvals to subdivide the existing property at 2 Pine Tree Drive into three (3) lots of record. One (1) lot of record is the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property (Attachment B). Lake Johanna Fire Department has purchased Lot 2 for a future fire station. The attorney for Lake Johanna Fire Department has requested to clear title. The effect of the releases are to free the new parcel from CUPs and easements. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-021 2 Pine Tree North - CUP Release Page 2 of 2 Notice and Public Comments A Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on January 15, 2021. Staff has received no comments. Attachments: A. Location Map B. Subdivision Exhibit C. City Council PowerPoint Disclaimer: This m ap is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy,availability, use or misuse of the inform ation herein pursuant to MNStatute 466.03 Subd 21. Location Map Cou nty Roa d E West Pine Tree DriveBenton WayH a r r i e t A v e n u eNB Hwy 51 To CO RD EBenton Way ± §¨¦35W §¨¦694 £¤10 Subject Parcel Park and Open Space Lot 1 Lot 2 Outlot A - Access Road C repeau Nature Pre serve ± Disclaimer: This m ap is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy,availability, use or misuse of the inform ation herein pursuant to MNStatute 466.03 Subd 21. Lot 3 Planning Case # 20-0021 –Public Hearing Required Applicant: Lake Johanna Fire Department Property Location: 2 Pine Tree North Drive Request: Conditional Use Permit Release 1 2 Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following motion language for this case. Recommend Approval:Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-021 to release the Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North. Recommend Denial:Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 20- 021 to release the Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North: the Planning Commission should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. Table:Motion to table Planning Case 20-021 to release the Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North.: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 1 of 10 PUBLIC HEARING – 9B MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 25, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 20-022 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Arden Hills RE, LLC Property Location: 2 Pine Tree Drive Request: Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following: Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 20-022 for application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Zoning Code Amendment for a project located at 2 Pine Tree Drive (“Subject Property”). The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 10B. Background At its June 22, 2020 meeting the City Council approved Bethel University’s proposal for a Master Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat at 12 Pine Tree Drive (Bethel’s Anderson Center). The approval subdivided the existing property into three (3) lots of record, one (1) lot of record for the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property. The Applicant is proposing to develop Lot 1 adjacent to Minnesota State Highway 51. The Subject Property is 6.4 acres and is currently owned by Bethel University. The Subject Property currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands. A segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system runs through the site as shown on the next page. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 2 of 10 1. Proposal and Use: The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living. New Perspective Senior Living owns and manages 24 senior living communities throughout the Midwest. The proposed facility in Arden Hills will offer independent care, assisted living, and memory care. The project also includes such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dog run, playground for young visitors, lawn bowling, salon and spa, bistro/bar and onsite physical therapy and wellness services. This facility will staff 80 employees and the anticipated max shift size is 34. Staff will be onsite 24 hours a day. 2. Previous City Council Review The City Council discussed the New Perspectives Senior Living concept plans at a Work Session on July 20, 2020. During the meeting Councilmembers expressed the need for trail looping and a child play area. In addition, the City Council discussed the proposed height of the structure and classifying memory care units as half units within the B-2 district. Minutes from the meetings are included in Attachment J. Plan Evaluation A PUD proposal shall identify any requested modifications from the applicable zoning requirements as well as the reasons why the modifications would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the B-2 District. Modifications to these requirements may be granted by the City without a variance through the PUD process. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission on January 6, 2021. The memo to the Planning Commission on this case is provided in Attachment H. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment I. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 3 of 10 1. Zoning Code Amendment The Applicant is proposing a Zoning Code Amendment for the maximum dwelling unit density per net acre allowed within the B-2 District only. The maximum density allowed within the B-2 and CMU District is 20 units per acre. The total proposed density is 23 units per acre or 146 units. However, the Applicant is proposing a different standard for the 33 memory care units. The Applicant is requesting that memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to a shared central dining and living areas - be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. In other cities ordinances, assisted living and memory care units are often considered less than one (1) unit because of the lack of apartment-like amenities such as a full kitchen and living area. In addition, it is common for memory care units to have a reduced footprint as the units are specially designed for residents that require memory care services. City code section 1325.045, Subdivision 1 requires efficiency (studio) units to be a minimum of five hundred and fifty (550) square feet. The Applicant is proposing units that range in size from 371 to 391 square feet. The Applicant and staff are proposing the zoning code amendment below and in Attachment D. 1320.085 Special Requirements for the B-2 General Business District. Subd. 5 Assisted Living Additional Planned Unit Development Criteria. (revised X/X/XXXX) A. In addition to meeting the requirements of Section 1325, multi-family assisted living residential projects may incorporate memory care units meeting the following: 1. Each unit consist of private bedrooms with bathrooms; 2. Each units is open to a shared central dining and living areas; 3. Units may be less than 550 square feet; 4. Memory care units shall be considered to be equivalent to .5 dwelling units. 2. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review A. Lot Area and Dimensions – Meets Requirements The Subject Property exceeds the minimum lot area and dimensions required for a development within the B-2 District. The total area of the Subject Property is 6.4 acres, or approximately 290,545 square feet. The Land Use Chart in Section 1320.05 highlights the minimum requirements for properties in the B-2 District. The maximum structure coverage allowed in the district is forty- five (45) percent of the lot. The proposed structure coverage is 64,644 square feet or 22 percent. Up to eighty (80) percent of the lot can be developed with impervious coverage. According to the site plan submitted by the Applicant, 3.4 acres or 53 percent of the site will be impervious. B. Building and Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements In the B-2 District, there is a 20-foot front building setback and rear setback and both side setbacks combined must equal 20 feet. The principal structure exceeds building setback requirements for its district. The proposed parking lot exceeds all parking lot setback requirements for the district. Ordinance requires all access drives to be setback five (5) feet from the property line. The proposed access drive on the west side of the proposed building and adjacent to Minnesota State City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 4 of 10 Highway 51/Snelling Avenue North serves as the delivery and pickup access of the proposed building. The proposed access drive meets the minimum five (5) foot setback from the property line. In addition, the proposed access drive is 24 feet wide. This additional width is needed to accommodate vehicles making pickups and deliveries at the loading docks (Attachment C - Pg. C402). As a condition of approval, in the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. C. Building Height - Flexibility requested Section 1305.04 of the City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance from the average elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs.” These measurements are illustrated in the drawing below. The Applicant is proposing a building that would be four (4) stories in height with a pitched roof design. The proposed pitched roof provides residents with a home-like residential aesthetic, where as a flat roof provides an institutional look and feel. The proposed facility would have a building height of 55 feet as measured from the finished floor elevation to the midpoint. Under the City Zoning Code, a building in the B-2 district can have a maximum height of up to 50 feet to the midpoint, so the Applicants are requesting flexibility for an additional 5 feet in height. The table below shows building heights for other developments in the community. *Not including penthouse and cellular equipment Development Name Mid-Point Summit Development 46 ft. Johanna Shores Senior Living 56 ft. E Street Flats 44 ft. Arden Flats Apartments 55 ft. Anderson Center 60 ft.* City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 5 of 10 D. Density and District Minimum Lot Area per Unit Requirements - Flexibility requested According to City Code Section 1320.06, the Minimum Lot Area per Unit allowed within the B-2 District is 2,178 square feet per unit. The minimum lot area is determined by dividing the total lot square footage by the total number of units. The Applicant proposing 146 units on approximately 6.4 acres, which equals a development with approximately 1,909 square feet per unit. Applicant is requesting flexibility with this standard because the 33 memory care units on-site are smaller studio style units and do not have full kitchens and living spaces like standard apartment units. The Applicant has submitted a document summarizing the memory care area design considerations (Attachment F). In addition, if the memory care units were excluded from the calculation of Minimum Lot Area per Unit, the development would meet the district provision with 2,467 square feet per unit. The maximum density allowed within the B-2 and CMU District is 20 units per acre. However, the Applicant is requesting flexibility with this provision. The total proposed density is 23 units per acre or 146 units. As previously discussed, the Applicant is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. In other cities’ ordinances, assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing units are often considered less than 1 unit because of the lack of amenities of a standard apartment unit such as a full kitchen and living area. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes, the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. *Unit count is rounded down as you cannot construct .23 of a unit. E. Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional CUP Criteria – Flexibility requested According to City Code Section 1320.45, the number of efficiency (studio) units in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total number of apartments. The Applicant is requesting 32 studio units or 22 percent. F. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) – Meets Requirements The FAR is obtained by dividing the total sum of all the building's floor areas by the lot area. Under the current Zoning Code, the maximum FAR for a property in the B-2 District is 0.8. The FAR is defined as the sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building, but not including decks and garages. The proposed floor area of the building minus the garage is 179,046 square feet. The Subject Property has an approximant area of 278,784 square feet, which means that the property has a FAR of 0.64. Land Use Site Acreage Number of Proposed Units Proposed Density Per Acre Proposed Memory Care Units Proposed Memory Care Equivalent Units Number of Equivalent Units Proposed Density Per Acre 146-16.5= 129.5 units 129.5 units/6.4 AC = 20.23* CMU 6.4 146 23 33 .5 16.5 20 City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 6 of 10 3. Design Standards A. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Applicant has submitted a lighting plan that identifies pole heights and lumen levels at the property lines. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style and downward directed with flush lenses. The Applicant is proposing to use LED lighting to illuminate the parking areas. B. Screening – Meets Requirements Screening for fences, walls, landscaping, and berms including materials with construction details shall match or complement the construction of the principle building. The Site Plan submitted by the Applicant depicts significant landscaping along Gateway Boulevard which will assist in screening the loading area and docks from the view of the public. The Applicant is stating that landscaping will achieve 60 percent opacity year round at maturity. According to the submitted plans all ground and rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened. C. Planting Islands – Meets Requirements Planting islands are required to visually break up expanses of hard-surface parking areas, to provide safe and efficient traffic movement, and to define rows of parking. Planting islands should occupy at least 10 percent of the parking area and be edged with concrete curbs. Parking lot planting islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet in area, be of appropriate width and length, and include at least one (1) tree meeting the requirements of this ordinance. There will not be multiple rows or large expanses of parking as there will be multiple landscaped bump outs breaking up the parking field. The landscaping will separate the building from the parking areas. D. Minimum Caliper Inches – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires that a minimum number of caliper inches be provided based on the gross square footage of the principal building and the building height. The minimum total caliper inches equal the gross square footage of all the floors of the principal building divided by 320. The proposed building would be considered a four-story structure, and contains 191,796 gross square feet. This requires a minimum of 558 caliper inches be planted. The plans provided by the Applicant indicate that they are meeting this requirement with 564 caliper inches. E. Tree Selection – Meets Requirements The proposed landscape plan includes a variety of tree species, including maples, oaks and evergreens, ranging in size from two and half (2.5) to six (6) caliper inches. This is consistent with ordinance requirements. The Applicant is proposing to plant six (6) to twelve (12) foot tall evergreens. F. Landscaped Area and Perennials and Shrubberies – Meets Requirements Zoning Code requires 35 percent of the site to be landscaped or 97,574 square feet. The landscaping plan shows that the total landscaped area provided on the site is 143,858 square feet. The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 10 percent of the total landscaped area to be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The total landscaped area on the site is 97,574 square feet, resulting in the need for a minimum of 9,757 square feet of perennial and shrubbery cover. The proposed perennial and shrub planting beds includes more than 17,350 square feet. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 7 of 10 G. Tree Mitigation - Flexibility requested City Code Section 1325.055 outlines the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Applicant submitted a Tree Preservation Plan that included a tree survey of the existing trees on site. The existing site has 3,837 caliper inches of significant trees. The Applicant is proposing to remove 3,127 caliper inches. The ordinance allows removal of 312.7 caliper inches without replacement. Removal of the remaining 2,814.3 caliper inches of trees requires mitigation at a ratio of 1:2 replacement, or 1,407.15 caliper inches of new trees. Tree planting onsite is limited due to existing and required stormwater ponding. In response the Applicant is proposing to plant 187 trees, with a total of 558 caliper inches. However, the Applicant is proposing a cash contribution of $20,000.00 in lieu of replacement. H. Parking - Flexibly Requested Parking requirements for senior living facilities are unique as not all tenants own vehicles. The intention is to regulate senior independent, staff and visitor parking. The rational for this is that memory care and assisted living residents generally do not have vehicles; therefore, the parking demand for those uses will only need to support staff and visitor parking. In addition, senior living facilities require a mixture of parking requirement for the different uses onsite. The proposed use includes Multi-family Dwelling and Residential Facility or Group Home. The number of off-street parking spaces required for a Residential Facility or Group Home is one (1) space for every four (4) residents plus one (1) for each employee on major shift plus one (1) for each on-call medical professional or 45 parking stalls. The minimum number of parking spaces required for a multiple family dwelling use in City Code is 1.1 spaces per efficiency and one (1) bedroom dwelling units and two (2) for each two (2) plus bedroom dwelling units. The proposed project would require 202 stalls. The submitted plans indicate 66 surface parking stalls and 29 enclosed parking stalls for a total of 95. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 8 of 10 Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency Residential Facility NA 45 95 -107 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls) 75 81 2 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls) 38 76 Total 113 202 The Applicant has provide staff with supporting documents that explains how they determine parking needs for their facilities (Attachment E). The Applicant has created a formula to determine the parking needs of their proposed facilities based on review of existing site operations. The Applicant has applied the formulas for its parking needs, and it has proved successful in their last 6 communities. The Applicant believes their site has adequate parking to meet their needs. However, this site is unique as it is located adjacent to Bethel’s Anderson Center that has a large existing parking lot. The Applicant and Bethel University are in discussions on a cross parking agreement. The Applicant would utilize the area for overflow parking for visitors at off peak times for the Anderson Center such as evenings and holidays. The proposed 95 parking stalls and the cross parking agreement stalls should adequately support the proposed use. I. Aesthetics - Meets Requirements There are additional Design Standards for new development, redevelopment, and modifications to existing sites in the B2 District. The purpose of these additional design standards is to promote a high level of architectural, landscaping, and site design in the business districts of Arden Hills. The City seeks to create a unified, harmonious, and high-quality environment to foster a distinct, positive, and successful image for the City. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials shall be of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone (or synthetic equivalent), decorative concrete plank (cement board siding), transparent glass or any combination thereof. The proposed building materials exceed the B2 material requirement. The proposed building is 100 percent brick, stone, glass and cement board siding. Elevation Stone Brick Cement Board Glass Total East 12% 13% 51% 24% 100% West 4% 11% 61% 24% 100% South/North Wing 5% 13% 57% 25% 100% South 5% 0% 73% 22% 100% North/South Wing 5% 17% 65% 23% 100% North .5% 7.5% 67% 25% 100% J. Traffic Study A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 9 of 10 study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. The anticipated trip generation during AM peak is 27 vehicles in and out of the site. The PM peak is 36 vehicles in and out of the site. The site is anticipated to create 424 daily trips. K. Park Dedication City Code 1130.08 requires that all subdivisions dedicate land to the City for a public use as a condition of approval for the development. Park dedication was not required as part of the original platting process for Planning Case 20-005 as the final uses were not indicated at that time. Park dedication was differed on the subject lots until development occurs. The proposed use of the subject property is high density residential and requires 20 percent of the gross area to be dedicated as parkland to the city. The subject site is 6.4 acre and would require 1.28 acres to be dedicated as parkland. The subject site does not have land feasible for a public park area. A cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required at the discretion of the City. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. According to Ramsey County data the fair market value of the subject lot is $1,060,100.00 and 20 percent of that value is $212,020.00. In order to meet this obligation, the Applicants are proposing to construct a public trail along the eastern and southern sides of the subject property and shown on the image below. This will create a connection to the existing trail on the Anderson Center. The cost of the proposed trail can be deducted from the total park dedication requirements. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 10 of 10 Public Notice and Comments A Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on January 15, 2021. A public neighborhood notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Staff has received one (1) comment (Attachment G). Neighborhood meeting Prior to submittal of a formal planning application the Applicant held an informal neighborhood meeting on July 9, 2020. Due to Covid-19 the meeting was held virtually with ten (10) residents in attendance. The Applicant gave a 30 minute presentation on the project follow by a question and answer session. The majority of the questions raised were in regard to traffic, tree preservation, site and building design, project financing and existing trial connections. The Applicant has incorporated the comments from the meeting into their application for the project. Attachments A. Application B. Location Map C. 11x17 Plans D. Zoning Code Amendment Redlines E. New Perspective Senior Living Parking Formulas F. New Perspective Senior Living Memory Care Unit Sizing G. Resident Comment Letter H. Planning Commission Memo I. Draft Planning Commission Minutes J. July 20, 2020 City Council Work Session Minutes K. City Council PowerPoint Presentation Page 1 of 3 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.cityofardenhills.org For Office Use Only Planning Case No. 20- Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant: Address: Telephone No.: Other: Fax No.: Email Address: Property Information Property Owner: Owner Address: Owner Telephone No. Other: Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: Property ID No.: Type of Use: Zone: Property Acreage: Type of Request Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Conditional Use or Interim Use Permit/CUP or IUP Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Preliminary Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500) Concept Plan Review (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Master Planned Unit Development or Master Special Development Plan (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Planned Unit Development or Final Special Development Plan (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Planned Unit Development Amendment or Special Development Plan Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Site Plan Review (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Rezoning or TCAAP Regulating Plan Amendment (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500) Zoning Code or TCAAP Redevelopment Code Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) City Code Amendment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Lot Split/Minor Subdivision (R-1 and R-2 Districts Only) (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,000) Variance or Permitted Adjustment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,000) Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Appeal of Administrative Decision (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000 Florent Ilazi - Owner's Representative - Boldt Capital, LLC 1110 North Old World 3rd St, Suite 610, Milwaukee, WI 53203 414-269-1401414-875-7518 florent.ilazi@boldt.com Bethel University 3900 Bethel Drive 952-451-3691 651-638-6009 2 Pine Tree Drive Lot 1 shown on attachment B-2 General Business District 6.4 Attachment A Page 2 of 3 Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaining the project): Filing & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional application requirements can be found at www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications. Complete/Incomplete Applications Under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 15.99, cities have 15 business days to review all plans and application materials to ensure they satisfy City requirements. During the 15 day review period, planning staff will provide written comments on the application and may request plan revisions. If the application is determined to be complete, Minnesota State Statute then requires the City to approve or deny the application within 60 days, up to 120 days. If not complete, the City may require plan revisions and/or additional information before the application is scheduled for Planning Commission review and/or City Council action. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. Payment of Fees and Escrows The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Each separate land use request shall be charged a separate administrative fee and escrow even if submitted on the same application. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include planning and engineering staff time, City Attorney and consulting fees, and mailing costs. If, at any time, a required cash escrow is depleted to less than 20 percent of its original amount, the applicant shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all fees have been paid. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. The escrow may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis. Notice of Meeting Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. *IMPORTANT* x Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398-3070 for additional information. x The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. x All applications will be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of consultant costs associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of application in the form of an escrow to the City. Please see Statement of Purpose and Conformance attached Page 3 of 3 Meeting Schedule Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday of each month at 6:30 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. The schedules below are for reference purposes only. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. 2019 Planning Commission and City Council Schedule (*subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday at 6:30 p.m.) TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the fourth Monday at 7:00 p.m.) January 8 January 27 February 5 February 24 March 4 March 23 April 8 April 27 May 6 May 25 June 3 June 22 July 8 July 27 August 5 August 24 September 9 September 28 October 7 October 26 November 11 November 23 December 9 January 11 (2021) January 6 (2021) January 25 (2021) Acknowledgement and Signature I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate per city code and ordinance requirements. I fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. __________________________________________________ ________________ Property Owner Signature (Required) Date ________________________________________________ ________________ Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date Please contact the City Planner at 651-792-7800 if you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City’s website: www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications __________ ature (If differen 10-9-20 Mark R. Posner 12 October 20 Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN Statute 466.03 Subd 21. Location Map Highway 51Tiller Lane County Road E West Glenarden RoadPine Tree DriveHarri e t A v e n u e Skiles Lane B e n t o n W a y Forest Lane Arden Place NB Hwy 51 To CO RD ECannon AvenueGlenarden CourtConnelly Av e n u e Dellwood AvenueHighway 51Benton Way ± §¨¦35W §¨¦694 £¤10 Subject Parcel Park and Open Space $WWDFKPHQW% This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:57pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC000ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNNORTHVICINITYN.T.S.SITEARDEN HILLS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MN1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCHWHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 22x34 SHEET.3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/ORUTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDINGPOSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERAMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC550 CLEVELAND AVENUE NORTHST PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: (651) 659-1364CONTACT: MICHAEL P. MCCARTHY, P.E.PROJECT TEAM:SURVEYORSUNDE LAND SURVEYING6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110BLOOMINGTON, MN, 55420-3435TELEPHONE: (952) 881-2455FAX: (952) 88-9526CONTACT: LEONARD F. CARLSON, P.L.S.ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: DANIEL ELENBAAS, P.E./RYAN HYLLESTED, P.L.A.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197OWNER / DEVELOPERNEW PERSPECTIVE5900 CLEARWATER DRIVE, SUTE 500MINNETONKA, MN 55343TELEPHONE: 952-746-3630CONTACT: ADAM COZINEARDEN HILLS SENIOR LIVINGSECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 23FORSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSARCHITECTTUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS7645 LYNDALE AVENUE #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423TELEPHONE: 612-389-9490CONTACT: GARY FISCHERSITE BENCHMARKS:(LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY)SBM #1 TOP OF NUT OF 2ND FIRE HYDRANT NORTH OF HARRIETAVENUE ON EAST SIDE OF PINE TREE DRIVEELEVATION=934.84SBM #2 TOP OF TOP NUT OF 1ST FIRE HYDRANT NORTH OF HARRIETAVENUE ON EAAST SIDE OF PINE TREET DRIVE ELEVATION=929.66SBM #3 TOP OF TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT 60± FT NW OF MAINBUILDINGELEVATION=927.30BENCHMARKSDRAWING INDEXSHEET NO. SHEET TITLEC000 COVER SHEETV100SURVEYV101SURVEYV102SURVEYC100GENERAL NOTESC200DEMO PLANC200 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLANC300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C400 SITE PLANC401 CROSS SECTIONSC402 TRUCK TURN MOVEMENTSC500 GRADING PLANC501 STORM SEWER PLANC600 UTILITY PLANC700 CIVIL DETAILSC701 CIVIL DETAILSC702 CIVIL DETAILSL100 LANDSCAPE PLANL101 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTL102 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTL103 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE - TREESL104 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE - SHRUBS & PERENNIALSL105 LANDSCAPE DETAILSL106 LANDSCAPE DETAILSL107 PHOTMETRIC PLANL108 LIGHTING DETAILSL109 LIGHTING DETAILSDEVELOPERBOLDT HOLDINGS LLC1110 NORTH OLD WORLD STREET, SUITE 160MILWAUKEE, WITELEPHONE: 414-276-4621CONTACT: CHRIS BUDAY Attachment C This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C1.1 SURVEY.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:57pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSURVEYV100ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNent, ttogether with the concepts and densigLIMMIIINAARY - NOTTTFgns presented herein, as an instrument ofOROOCOOOOOONSTRUCCCTIf service, is cintended only for the specific IOOOOONpurpose aend client for which it was prepapared. Reuse of and improper reliance on tthis document without written authorizatioon and adaptatioan by Kimley-Horn and Asssociates,Inc. shnall be without liabilityy to KKimley-Horn and Associate This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C1.1 SURVEY.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:57pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSURVEYV101ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNPRELIMINARY - NNOT FOR CONSTRRUCTION This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C1.1 SURVEY.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:57pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSURVEYV102ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNPRELIMINARY - NNOT FOR CONSTRRUCTION This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:58pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC100ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOMEFAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALLWORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCTTHE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEAPPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK,EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL.3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02,ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATABY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TOTHE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLYVERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTINGUNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELYACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'SRESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THECONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURREDBECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FORTEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING ORRELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED ANDTHEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK.4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAYHAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCINGWORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIESPRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ANDBONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIALCONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THEOWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGNARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER.8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THEOWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATIONWHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATECONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THEOWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILTDATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES AREENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR.10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELLDRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALLBE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED.11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THEAPPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWNON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IFANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONOF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF ANIDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANYOBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER.13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THEDOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACTTHE ENGINEER AND OWNER.TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONSCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THEFOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:- PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATIONASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALKINSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'DTEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:- DENSITY TEST REPORTS- BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM- PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER- LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS- ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITYWATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES,AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTORSHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OFTRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETEACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THEMOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCOMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THENOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUGWHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACESWIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BEPLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I.PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONSWHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED.ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROMTHE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TOCOMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE.7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BECOMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'SSPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCYREQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIORTO BACK FILLING.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THESPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOTBE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ONGRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNERAND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICALCLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES.11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THECONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARYTO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE ISWATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORMSEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFICBEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALLBE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BEADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THECONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUTEXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY AREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TOSAME.16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERTOUT.17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORMSTRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN.18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED.19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARETO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE ANDBELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITYTO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OFCONSTRUCTION.21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER ISUTILIZED.22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITYCOMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATEFINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES.23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONSARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH ANDSPECIFICATIONS.25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALSSPECIFICATIONS.26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTDIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS.28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING.GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING ANDPROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S ASNECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASSSTAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THATSURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTORSHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADINGDISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OFPAVEMENT OR UTILITIES.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS,POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBEDDURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TOMATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES.5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THATTHE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALLBE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLYINSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED.6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETIONOF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEREGRADED AND SODDED.7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TESTAND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAINTOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED.8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLSAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAMETYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OFCONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURESSHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDEPOSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS.10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONALAGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEJURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALLGOVERN.12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREASSHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED ANDMAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FORANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR ATNO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHEDAS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING ANDSCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHERSUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNINGREGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURSOF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION,SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES.15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTINGAREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTEDAND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION.17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS AND MN/DOTSPECIFICATIONS.18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN.20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONSAND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALLREPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUTCOMPENSATION.22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS.ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET.24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT ANDSTORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITHCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUSGRADE.26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALTPAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING.EROSION CONTROL NOTES1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROLPLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONSOF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTIONSHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MNNATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOMEFAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCALREQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THETRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED,WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING ISREQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE INAN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALLFINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BYTHE GENERAL PERMIT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALLALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, ANDAREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BEDETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED.9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ONSITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS ANDOTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALEDCONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OFWIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE.12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED ASSOON AS IS PRACTICABLE.13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOTADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITHSOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICHTHEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIESIN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE ORSTORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTSINCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS,SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OFLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT.16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THEDESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ENGINEERING DIVISION.17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITESEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/ORADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSIONCONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCEALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALLJURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OFTHE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIEDPERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALLEVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OFUNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION.1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREASSHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTSREFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BEREMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE.3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENTTRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSINGOF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FORPARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING ASCONDITIONS DEMAND.5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION.PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAYSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION)OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTYREGULATIONS.2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUALON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKINGSTALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUSSTRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB.5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET.6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINTSEALANT.7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS INTHE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCEBY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THECONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER.10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A).GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALLCONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPESEXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NOCASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSTALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEERIMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTORCHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES.11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. 20-22178AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INCARDEN HILLS, MNDATED JUNE 2, 2020 WETLAND TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGELTYP.LTYP.LTYP.GGBGTYP.TYP.EXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREAP R I V A T E D R I V ESNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPRRThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:58pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORDEMO PLANC200ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATIONAPPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS,PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THEPLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLEMATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECTDOCUMENTS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THEDEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITSREQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT ANDRECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES.UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANYCONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCESAND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THEBEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THEENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANYDEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OFEXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK.6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACTLOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDPROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITYCOMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINESBEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK.7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVEDOR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIMESHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY ISNECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSEATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES,ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARDENHILLS, RAMSEY COUNTY AND MN/DOT.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURINGCONSTRUCTION.10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED.11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT ISREQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OFTHE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL ANDREPAIR.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATERDEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION ISCONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASESOF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIREDWATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTSASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NOEXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNERIMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITHALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS.16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NOACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTESNORTHLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE BUILDINGREMOVE TREEREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE UTILITY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING J-BARRIEREXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SIGNEXISTING FLARED END SECTIONEXISTING STORM MANHOLEEXISTING STORM CATCHBASINEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVEEXISTING WELLEXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLEREXISTING ROOF DRAINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING METAL COVEREXISTING ELECTRICAL METEREXISTING AIR CONDITIONEREXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLEEXISTING CABLE BOXEXISTING GUY WIREEXISTING POWER POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING TREECLEARING & GRUBBINGFILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINESEXISTING TREE LINEEXISTING CURB & GUTTERLEGENDFULL DEPTH SAWCUTKEYNOTE LEGENDPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITYPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTUREPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERINSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND STRUCTUREPRIOR TO INITIATING REMOVALS AND SITE GRADINGPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN; LOCATION APPROXIMATE -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDREMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAILPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE; LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTINSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL BARRIER FOR TEMPORARY TRAILCLOSURE DURING CONSTRUCTIONPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREEREMOVE EXISTING TREEFULL DEPTH SAWCUTEXISTING IMPACTED VEGETATIONABCDEFGHIKLRVAAABAAAADDHBBDBFFFFI PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSSNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPPRIVATE DRIVEABBBBBBBCC18318477797887807675747360615958628584888672716564636970575668551868182839695949392919098666753545251494836991001011031041051063530343332312827291171161081091101111121131231221141151211191201241251261271281421351331291301321311361341411181371391402322212019181714314414814714614514915115215315415516116015915715815616516917516416216316716816617217117317417617997185187188189242526434445464750138150414217717818018118289Genus, SpeciesCommonRemoved Condition17Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD18Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD19Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD20Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD21Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD22Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD23FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 34 YES GOOD24FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 24 YES POOR25Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES POOR26Salix spp.Willow 16 YES POOR27Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YES GOOD28Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD29FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 16 YES GOOD30Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD31Populus deltoidesCottonwood 24 YES GOOD32Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD33Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD34Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD35Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD36Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES GOOD41Acer negundoBoxelder 22 YES DEAD42Acer negundoBoxelder YES DEAD43Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES POOR44Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES POOR45Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES POOR46Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES POOR47Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES POOR48Salix spp.Willow22YESFAIR49Salix spp.Willow 38 YES GOOD50Acer negundoBoxelder 104 YES POOR51Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR52Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD53Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD54Acer negundoBoxelder 46 YES GOOD55Populus deltoidesCottonwood 64 YES GOOD56Populus deltoidesCottonwood 70 YES GOOD57Populus deltoidesCottonwood 60 YES GOOD58Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YES GOOD59Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES GOOD60Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD61Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD62Populus deltoidesCottonwood 44 YES GOOD63Acer negundoBoxelder 34 YES GOOD64FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD65Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD66Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD67FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YES GOOD68Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YES GOOD69Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES FAIR70Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD71Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YESFAIR72FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 10 YES GOOD73Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR74Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR75Populus deltoidesCottonwood 56 YES GOOD76Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD77FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash22YESFAIR78Populus deltoidesCottonwood42YES GOOD79Salix spp.Willow 18 YESFAIR80FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 20 YES FAIR81Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR82FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 12 YES FAIR83Populus deltoidesCottonwood 72 YES FAIR84FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 12 YES FAIR85FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 14 YES GOOD86Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES GOOD87Salix spp.Willow 22 YES GOOD88FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 14 YES FAIR89Salix spp.Willow 18 YES CRITICAL90Acer negundoBoxelder 32 YES FAIR91FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash11YES FAIR92Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR93Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YESFAIR94Acer negundoBoxelder14YESFAIR95Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR96Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR97Acer negundoBoxelder 22 YES FAIR98Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR99FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 22 YES GOOD100 Acer saccarhaumSugar maple12YESEXCELLENT101Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES EXCELLENT103FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR104Populus deltoidesCottonwood42YESFAIR105Quercus rubraRed oak14YES GOOD106Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD108Salix spp.Willow 26 YESFAIR109Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR110Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YESFAIR111Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YESFAIR112Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES FAIR113 Ulmus americana American elm 12 YES FAIR114Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YES GOOD115FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD116FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 22 YES FAIR117Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD118Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD119Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD120Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD121Populus deltoidesCottonwood 25 YESFAIR122Populus deltoidesCottonwood22YES FAIR123Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES FAIR124Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES FAIR125Populus deltoidesCottonwood 40 YESFAIR126Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 YESFAIR127Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR128Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YESFAIR129Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES FAIR130Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YES FAIR131Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES GOOD132Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD133Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES FAIR134Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YES FAIR135Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES FAIR136Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES GOOD137Populus deltoidesCottonwood 61 YESFAIR138Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 YES POOR139Populus deltoidesCottonwood 37 YESFAIR140Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YESFAIR141Salix spp.Willow 16 YES GOOD142FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR143Salix spp.Willow42NOFAIR144Salix spp.Willow 14 NO FAIR145Populus deltoidesCottonwood24NOFAIR146Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NOFAIR147Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NOFAIR148Populus deltoidesCottonwood24NOFAIR149Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 NO FAIR150Salix spp.Willow 18 YES POOR151Populus deltoidesCottonwood21NO GOOD152Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD153Populus deltoidesCottonwood 22 YES GOOD154Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NO FAIR155Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD156Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 YES GOOD157Populus deltoidesCottonwood 21 NO GOOD158Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 NO GOOD159Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 NO GOOD160Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 NO GOOD161Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NO GOOD162Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD163Populus deltoidesCottonwood 20 NO GOOD164Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NO GOOD165Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD166Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 NO GOOD167Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 NO GOOD168Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 NO GOOD169Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 NO GOOD171Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 NO GOOD172Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD173Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD174Populus deltoidesCottonwood 55 NO GOOD175Populus deltoidesCottonwood12NO GOOD176Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NO GOOD177Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES DEAD178Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 YES DEAD179Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES CRITICAL180Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD181Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD182Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD183Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD184Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD185Salix spp.Willow 21 YES GOOD186Salix spp.Willow 36 YES GOOD187Acer spp. Maple27 NO GOOD188Acer spp. Maple22 YES GOOD189Salix spp.Willow 16 YES GOODGenus, SpeciesCommonRemoved ConditionThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:59pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORTREE INVENTORYANDPRESERVATIONPLANC200ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNTREE TO BE REMOVEDPROPERTY LINETREE TO REMAINLEGENDTREE PROTECTIONSIGNFURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINEOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRIP LINE1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORTWILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY.3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITYHAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ONTREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES.4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHINDISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS.5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTALAUTHORITY.6. SIGNIFICANT TREE. A TREE THAT IS IMPORTANT TO THE SITE AND THE NEIGHBORHOODCHARACTER, THAT IS STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND HEALTHY, AND THAT MEETS AT LEASTONE OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:x A DECIDUOUS HARDWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TEN (10) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IRONWOOD, CATALPA, OAK, HARD MAPLE, WALNUT,HICKORY, BIRCH, BLACK CHERRY, HACKBERRY, LOCUST AND BASSWOOD.x A DECIDUOUS SOFTWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TWELVE (12) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COTTONWOOD, POPLARS/ASPEN, BOX ELDER,WILLOW, SILVER MAPLE AND ELM.x A CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREE HAVING FOLIAGE ON THE OUTERMOST PORTION OFTHE BRANCHES YEAR-ROUND AND WHICH IS AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET OR MORE INHEIGHT.xA GROUP OF DECIDUOUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST EIGHT (8) CALIPER INCHES ORCONIFEROUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET IN HEIGHT, THAT PROVIDEA BUFFER OR SCREENING ALONG AN ADJACENT PUBLIC STREET OR BETWEENDIFFERING LAND USES.TREE PROTECTION NOTESTEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENTSCALE: N.T.S.C2001KEYNOTE LEGENDEXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.)EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.)LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.)TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)ABCDTOTAL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES: 3,837TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 3,127TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED: 710ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL: 312.7 = (3,837 - 710)*0.1SIGNIFICANT TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED 1,407.15 CAL.IN. = ((3,837-710) - 312.7)/2NOTE: DEAD OR DYING TREES NOT COUNTED IN TREE MITIGATION DATATREE MITIGATION DATATREE INVENTORY DATANORTHLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT TRAP 25,040 CF - 4.0' DEEPSEDIMENT TRAP 19,900 CF - 4.0' DEEPSEDIMENT TRAP 4720 CF - 2.0' DEEPSEDIMENT TRAP 3792 CF - 2.0' DEEPEWETLAND TO BEIMPACTED/ FILLEDWETLAND TOREMAINEEEEFFFBBCCDAAAAASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPPRIVATE DRIVEPROPOSEDPROPERTYLINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C3-EROS PH1 PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:00pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN -PHASE 1C300ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNNORTHEROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BESTABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FORMATERIALS.5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDINGTHE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION.7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR.8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTOEXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS ASNECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATERFROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER,PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUELAND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC.,IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES INLOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUTPIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING.ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR ASREQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF ARDEN HILLS GRADING PERMIT.SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:ROCK ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCESAFETY FENCEBIOROLLLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCECONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDIVERSION DITCHSAFETY FENCEABCDEFDRAINAGE DELINEATIONDIVERSION DITCHTEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPDRAINAGE AREA AND SEDIMENTTRAP TABLETRIBUTARYDRAINAGEAREASEDIMENTBASINVOLUMESEDIMENT BASIN 1 2.75 AC9,900 CFSEDIMENT BASIN 2 1.40 AC5,040 CFSEDIMENT BASIN 3 0.22 AC 792 CFSEDIMENT BASIN 4 0.20 AC 720 CFLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 5.59 ACTOTAL SITE AREA 6.67 ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA 6.51 ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.16 ACPOST-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA 3.30 ACPOST-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.37 ACPH. I BMP QUANTITIESBMPUNITQUANTITYCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEEA. 1INLET PROTECTION EA 2SILT FENCE LF±3,000CONSTRUCTION FENCE LF±2,300DELINEATED WETLAND PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSBBBBBBBBBBEEEFFBBBBBBPROPOSEDPROPERTYLINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINE1.01%2.93%5.94%5.49%9.54%5.31%1.83%2.93%13.54%1.97%4.75%1.57%2.10%1.96%3.29%3.04% 4.41%BFFBBCDAAAAABBBBBBThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C3-EROS PH2 PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:01pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN -PHASE 2C301ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNNORTHEROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BESTABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FORMATERIALS.5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDINGTHE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION.7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR.8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTOEXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS ASNECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATERFROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER,PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUELAND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC.,IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES INLOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUTPIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING.ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR ASREQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF ARDEN HILLS GRADING PERMIT.SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:ROCK ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCESAFETY FENCEBIOROLLLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCECONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDIVERSION DITCHSAFETY FENCEABCDEFDRAINAGE DELINEATIONDIVERSION DITCHTEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 5.59 ACTOTAL SITE AREA 6.67 ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA 6.51 ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.16 ACPOST-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA 3.30 ACPOST-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.37 ACPH. 2 BMP QUANTITIESBMPUNITQUANTITYCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEEA. 1INLET PROTECTION EA 23SILT FENCE LF±2,300CONSTRUCTION FENCE LF±1,500DELINEATED WETLAND PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSTRAIL EXTENSIONSANITARY SEWER EASEMENT20' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACKPROPOSEDPROPERTYLINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEEXISTINGPROPERTYLINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINE24.0'9.0'18.0'9.0'18.0'9.0'18.0'9.0'18.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'22.0'24.0'5.1'10.0'8.0'AAAAAAABBDDEFFAGGGGBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHCCC9.0'9.0'18.0'LMMCCOBEGINOENDLMR66R90R15R15R35R15R15R50R75R85R12R37R59R44R69R45R325.0'IIEEKKKKKKKKCCLLOOBBCCR45AAPPPREPARED FORSITE PLANC400ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY278,757 SF (6.4 AC)BUILDING AREA64,644 SF (23% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING72 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING91 SPACES(62 ABOVEGROUND,29 UNDERGROUND)ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED4 SPACES/ 6 SPACES(4 ABOVEGROUND,2 UNDERGROUND)PROPERTY SUMMARYARDEN HILLS SENIOR LIVINGTOTAL PROPERTY AREA278,757 SF (6.4 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA155,428 SF (3.6 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA123,329 SF (2.8 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA242,784 SF (5.6 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGB-2 GENERAL BUSINESSDISTRICTPROPOSED ZONINGB-2 GENERAL BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10'ROAD = 20'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 20'SIDE = 10'REAR = 10'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBNOT IN USECONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)GUARD RAILABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg January 05, 2021 - 10:27am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 5' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 02/06/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 6.4 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.17. THERE ARE ±1.02 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.*PER CODE: 1 FOR EVERY 4 RESIDENTS PLUS 1 FOR EACH EMPLOYEE ONMAJOR SHIFT PLUS 1 FOR EACH ON-CALL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL.IT IS ASSUMED THERE IS ONE EMPLOYEE PER 10 UNITS, AND 1 MEDICALPROFESSIONAL ON CALL PER 20 UNITSPROPOSED GUARD RAILNORTH FACE OFBUILDINGVARIES18.0'PARKING18.0'PARKING24.0'PAVEMENT SECTION PERGEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONGRADEDSWALE7.0'SWLKEXISTINGGRADEFACE OFBUILDINGVARIES18.0'PARKING24.0'VARIES8.0'BIKEPATHPAVEMENT SECTION PERGEOTECH RECOMMENDATION7.0'SWLKCMU BLOCK WALLBY OTHERSFALL PROTECTIONEXISTINGGRADEFACE OFBUILDING16.8'BUILDINGENTRY18.0'PARKING18.0'PARKING24.0'VARIES8.0'BIKEPATHPAVEMENT SECTION PERGEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONEXISTINGGRADEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\SECTIONS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:02pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCROSS SECTIONSC401ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNSECTION A-ANTSSECTION B-BNTSSECTION C-CNTS PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSSteering AngleLock to Lock TimeArticulating AngleWB-67Trailer TrackTractor TrackTrailer WidthTractor Width19.504.00feet8.508.50:8.008.00:::0.003.0045.5015.0053.00:::6.028.475.0Lock to Lock TimeDAF PlatformWidthTrackSteering Anglefeet::8.208.20:45.7:6.016.348.1433.14PREPARED FORTRUCK TURNMOVEMENTSC402ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C4-TRUCK TURN PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:03pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEWET DETENTION BASINTOP 920.50100 YEAR HWL 919.08NWL 915.50TOP 920.50BOTTOM 909.50926.76920.80921.21922.096.1%10:17:110:1ME:925.89ME:924.97928.50928.50LP:917.46LP:917.46921.89925.003:13:1TW:926.50BW:926.46TW:925.87TW:923.75TW:925.61BW:921.93BW:923.71921.55TW:921.90BW:921.22TW:922.16BW:920.04TW:917.94BW:917.11920.39926.04927.25LP:920.517.1%2.4%9.2%6.1%6.0%3.1%2.1%2.0%3.4%4.4%2.5%919.70919.19920.90926.21926.58926.70925.91925.88924.98924.78923.57923.45ME:920.35ME:919.925:13:1ME:929.31928.56929.46ME:929.55929.22925.76925.64926.52925.90926.02925.97926.09T/G:925.74T/G:925.69T/G:926.21T/G:926.34FFE = 928.5927.41928.00927.90927.33927.23FFE = 928.5922.20FFE = 928.5924.77FFE = 928.5928.00LL FFE = 917.5LL FFE = 917.5928.22927.18927.988.4%BW:922.051.9%927.05925.61TW:921.46BW:917.10TW:926.81BW:916.98TW:927.45BW:917.93926.34TW:927.13BW:918.66924.52925.14925.52TW:925.13BW:918.95928.50928.50LP:927.43LP:927.71LP:928.16927.96928.22927.83927.44927.54926.83926.91928.34928.42927.71927.69927.91928.03928.29928.50928.50926.01925.89923.88925.34925.22926.73TW:926.37BW:922.00926.40TW:926.58BW:921.46926.61926.53922.96922.88(6.0%)(23.3%)(6.7%)3.6%EOF:920.00926.564.5%11.9%(17.4%)ME:920.27ME:917.68ME:915.005.2%ME:915.98ME:915.99This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:04pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING PLANC500ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNNORTHGRADING PLAN NOTESPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCOD1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE VERIFIED PER MEPPLANS.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.FLOWLINE MNDOT DITCH PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSST-10STMH 60" DIA.RE:926.53IE:917.61 NEIE:918.61 NEIE:917.51 WST-15CBMH 48" DIA.RE:925.82IE:922.20 SWST-12CBMH 48" DIA.RE:925.67IE:919.77 NIE:920.77 NWIE:919.67 SWST-11CBMH 48" DIA.RE:925.33IE:918.86 NEIE:918.76 SWST-17CBMH 48" DIA. (CIR.)RE:919.00IE:916.50 EIE:916.50 SWST-8CBMH 48" DIA.& TRENCH DRAINRE:917.47IE:915.46 SEST-9CONC. FES 24"IE:916.50 EST-1CONC. FES 24"IE:916.50 NST-18CONC. FES 18"IE:916.10 NEST-19CONC. FES 18"W/ TRASH RACKIE:916.50 W4 LF - 12"@ 1.00%28 LF - 18" RCP@ 1.41%7 LF - 18" RCP@ 0.00%ST-22CB 24" DIA.RE:927.08IE:923.00 EST-23CB 24" DIA.RE:927.62IE:922.62 WIE:922.52 EST-37CBMH 48" DIA.RE:926.54IE:921.61 NEIE:921.61 WIE:921.61 SST-25CB 24" DIA.RE:926.93IE:923.38 NEIE:923.28 SEST-24CB 24" DIA.RE:927.94IE:923.94 SWST-35CB 24" DIA.RE:928.50IE:922.41 NWIE:922.31 SEST-34CB 24" DIA.RE:928.50IE:924.00 SEST-29CB 24" DIA.RE:928.22IE:923.50 N6 LF - 12"@ 2.32%ST-30STRM CORE:928.35IE:923.37 SIE:923.27 NWST-31STRM CORE:928.41IE:922.62 SEIE:922.52 NST-28STRM CORE:927.65IE:920.64 EIE:920.64 SIE:920.54 NW33 LF - 12"@ 2.00%ST-27CB 24" DIA.RE:927.71IE:921.41 NEIE:921.31 W54 LF - 12"@ 2.00%ST-36CB 24" DIA.RE:928.35IE:922.59 EIE:922.49 SWST-26CB 24" DIA.RE:927.43IE:923.43 WST-20CBMH 48" DIA.RE:921.08IE:918.01 EIE:917.91 SW43 LF - 12"@ 6.16%ST-33CB 24" DIA.RE:924.59IE:920.76 EIE:920.66 WST-38BUILDING CONNECTION (IN)COORD W/MEPRE:916.65IE:915.42 NWEXISTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 15" SANITARY SEWER20 LF - 12"@ 2.10%ST-42CBMH 48" DIA.RE:924.71IE:921.18 WST-41CB 24" DIA.RE:927.77IE:920.73 NWIE:920.63 SWWET DETENTION BASINTOP 920.50100 YEAR HWL 919.08TOP 920.50BOTTOM 909.50ST-7CBMH 48" DIA.RE:921.08IE:917.73 NEIE:917.73 SW55 LF - 14" x 23" ARCH@ 0.31%ST-5CBMH 48" DIA.RE:926.20IE:917.43 NEIE:918.43 SEIE:917.43 SW19 LF - 12"@ 10.86%ST-4STMH 60" DIA.RE:920.51IE:916.73 NEIE:916.73 SThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C5-STORM SEWER PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:05pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSTORM SEWERPLANC501ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNNORTHGRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE VERIFIED PER MEPPLANS.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.23. STORM SEWER PIPE, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS, 2621, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATIONS, 2018 EDITIONAND LATEST EDITION OF THE MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION.PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINELEGENDPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED WATERMAINCOPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIOND PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSP I N E T R E E D R I V EPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEWATERMAIN (BY OTHERS)GAS MAIN (BY OTHERS)UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (BY OTHERS)EXISTING 15"SANITARYSEWERPINE TREEDRIVESS-254" SSWR MHW/ EXTERNAL DROPRE:926.98IE:909.81 SEIE:904.18 NEIE:904.1 SWSS-354" SSWR MHRE:921.77IE:(905.2±) NEIE:905.13 SWSS-1BUILDING SERVICECOORD W/MEPIE:912.50 NW98 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.10%11.9'11.8'14.7'SS-954" SSWR MHRE:922.14IE:(902.8±) NEIE:902.75 SW25 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.10%GRINDER STATION60" SSWR MHRE:927.20IE:(910.4±) SEIE:910.34 NWThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:05pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC600ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNUTILITY PLAN NOTES1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OFPROPOSED UTILITIES.2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C1503. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 1504" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PERANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUSTBLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THECITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE ORSTRUCTURE).7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.N THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THESANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEETON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVEMECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AMINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 ORANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFOREBACKFILLING.10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSEDPAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, INGREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIONSTRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEWLINES.13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITYOF ARDEN HILLS AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONOF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THEFIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURSBEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALLBE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIESWHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ORCERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATIONREQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THEINTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED ANDMAINTAINED.21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTIONBLOCKING.22. CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, 2600TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/ SURFACE RESTORATION, 2611 WATERMAIN ANDSERVICE LINE INSTALLATION, AND 2621 SANITARY AND STORM INSTALLATION, 2018EDITION ARE HEREIN INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.23. THE PROVISIONS OF CEAM 2621.2.A.5 ARE SUPPLEMENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING:CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL INCLUDE CORE DRILLING WITH COUPLINGCONSISTING OF AN ELASTOMERIC SLEEVE INCORPORATING DOUBLE STAINLESS STEELTENSION BANDS AND SCREWS INTENDED FOR DIRECT BURY SEWER APPLICATIONS.24. THE PROVISIONS OF CEAM 2621.2.B ARE SUPPLEMENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: METALSEWER CASTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. ALLCASTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 35 OR BETTER. THE WORDS "SANITARY SEWER" OR "STORMSEWER" SHALL BE CAST ON TOP OF EACH MANHOLE COVER IN TWO (2) INCH LETTERS ASAPPLICABLE.25. DEFLECTION TESTING AND TELEVISING OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHALL BECONDUCTED AFTER THE FINAL BACKFILL HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR 30 DAYS, WITHRESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER. PRE AND POST CONSTRUCTIONTELEVISING INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT FORTHE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE.26. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 FOR DIAMETERS LESS THAN 20 INCHES, WITHPOLYETHYLENE ENCASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C105. PVC WATERMAIN PIPESHALL CONFORM TO AWWA STANDARD C-900 (DR 18), INTEGRAL BELL WITH ELASTOMERICGASKET JOINTS PROVIDING A WATER-TIGHT SEAL CONFORMING TO ASTM F477, WITHTWO (2) STRANDS OF TRACER WIRE LAID WITH ALL PVC WATERMAIN. FITTINGS FORWATERMAIN SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT, CLASS 350, DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTINGSIN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C550. FITTINGS SHALL BE FUSION BONDED EPOXY COATEDON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ACCORDING TO AWWA C550 AND C116/A21.16. ALL NUTSAND BOLTS ARE TO BE STAINLESS STEEL OR COR-BLU. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BEAMERICAN FLOW CONTROL WATEROUS PACER FIRE HYDRANT (YELLOW). ALL HYDRANTSSHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C502.27. 15" SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED VIA OPEN CUT EXCAVATION WITH FULLGRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT IN CONFORMANCE WITH CEAM 2600 FORFLEXIBLE PIPE TO A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 2 FEET ABOVE THE TOP OF PIPE. PIPE SECTIONSSHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.NORTHKEYNOTE LEGENDCONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN STUB WITH GATE VALVEFIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE 8"x6" TEE, 6" WATERMAIN AND 6" GATEVALVE8" COMBINED WATER SERVICETRANSFORMER AND GENERATOR LOCATION. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSFOR SCREENINGINSTALL MANHOLE OVER EXISTING 15" SEWER8" BENDCOMBINED WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING, COORD W/MEPSANITARY SEWER SERVICEADJUST EXISTING CASTING TO NEW RIM ELEVATIONABCDEFGHISANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAINGATE VALVEHYDRANTTEEREDUCERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONEGAS MAINSTORM SEWERLEGENDCOSANITARY CLEANOUTCOEXISTING PROPOSEDCADCCIHBBFFFFFFFFGEE EXISTING 15" CLASS V RCP9009109209309009109209309+00(916.01)924.6510+00(916.25)926.9811+00(917.42)925.2812+00(920.30)921.7813+00(923.15)SS-2STA: 10+00RE:926.98IE:909.81 SEIE:904.18 NEIE:(904.1±) SW218 LF - 15" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.44%SS-3STA: 12+17.80RE:921.77IE:(905.2±) NEIE:905.13 SWEXISTING 15" CLASS V RCPFINISHED GRADEEXISTING GRADE150 LF - 15" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.82%SS-9STA: 8+49.89RE:922.14IE:902.85 NEIE:902.75 SWThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C6.1-SEWER PROFILE.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:06pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORPUBLIC SANITARYSEWER PROFILEC601ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNPUBLIC SANITARY SEWER PROFILEHORIZ: 1" = 40'VERT: 1" = 4' This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C700 CIVIL DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:06pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCIVIL DETAILSC700ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNDEAD STORAGE6'TOP BERM: 920.50NWL: 916.50BOTTOM OFPOND: 909.503:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE10' WIDE SAFETEY BENCH, 10:1 SLOPETOP BENCH: 916.50BOTTOM BENCH: 915.50HOLEHOLESECTIONPRECAST 48"DIAM. MANHOLESTEPS AS PER 16"O.C.CONSTRUCT 1.5" KEYWAY OR SUPPLYCERTIFIED SHOP DRAWING DETAILINGCONCRETE WALL CONNECTOR TOMANHOLE SIDE WALL.6" THICK WEIR WALL WITH ORIFICE,SEE SECTION VIEW FOR ORIFICESIZE AND ELEVATIONTOP OFWEIR WALLEL:918.0048"18" STORMINLET IE=916.506" PRE-CASTBASE48"5"18" STORMOUTLETIE=916.50PLAN1/2" SS ANCHOR BOLTSWITH CLIPS (4 THUS)1/4"x1" FLAT BAR 1" TOOUTSIDE MH WALLHOT-DIPPEDGALVANIZED GRATE#5 SMOOTH BARS @4" O.C. EACH WAYSKIMMERCOVER, SEEPLAN9"RIM EL: 919.00ORIFICE IN WEIRWALL, SEE SECTION6" WEIRWALLTOP OFWEIR WALLEL: 918.00FINISHEDGRADEIE: 916.50SCALE: NTSOCS 11SCALE: NTSBMP 1 - TYPICAL SECTION2SCALE: NTSEMERGENCY SPILLWAY - BMP 15#4 REBAR 12" O.C. EWCENTERED ON WEIRWITH 2" MINIMUMCLEARANCE TO FACEOF CONCRETESECTION B-BSECTION A-A2'3:1 (MAX.)X XXXXXXX6"6'6"CLASS 3 RIPRAPPROFILESECTION A-AEMBANKMENTGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRICEOF 920.50'EL. 920.00'XXXXXXXXXXXX6"3:1 (MAX.)GEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC6"AAEOF 920.50'EL. 920.00'EL. 916.00'12CLASS 3 RIPRAP(1) 12" ORIFICE:EL: 916.50 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C700 CIVIL DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:06pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCIVIL DETAILSC701ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C700 CIVIL DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:07pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCIVIL DETAILSC702ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C700 CIVIL DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:07pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORFENCE DETAILSC703ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN SEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH SAVANNA GRASS SEED MIX BY PRAIRIE RESTORATION INC. (TYP.)33-26122-112SAVPLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSP I N E T R E E D R I V EDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSAVSAVSAVSAVSAVSAV1L102LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENT1 - KCY*5 - WSB*2 - FFM+3 - RVB+1 - HON*6 - CQA5 - PFC2 - ABM+1 - NPO+2 - HON*3 - RVB+1 - ABM+2 - HON*1 - PAG3 - SSC1 - ALS2 - HON*2 - RVB3 - NPO*3 - SCP*3 - WHP+3 - SSC3 - SCP1 - FFM+3 - SSC2 - RDL2 - KCY*3 - CBS2 - KCY*3 - RVB1 - ABM2 - RVB2 - NWS3 - RVB3 - WHP1 - RDO2 - WSB3 - BHS3 - SCP1L1014 - FRS1 - WHP1 - WHP4 - FRS3 - NWS2 - SWO3 - BHS3 - WHP1 - RDO9 - ELM2 - BHS2 - CBS6 - ERC1 - NWM3 - QUA1 - HON2 - AUP1 - NWM2 - RVB3 - BHS2 - WHP3 - RDO+2 - SCP2 - NWS+3 - CBS*F11 - PRX*11 - PRX*2 - PRX+3 - ACCDALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)ABCDLANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)BOULDER (TYP.)FLAGSTONE PAVERS (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC (SEE DETAIL)SOD (TYP.)TREESBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEPRX* ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK` TM PRAIRIE EXPEDITION AMERICAN ELMPRX+ ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK` TM PRAIRIE EXPEDITION AMERICAN ELMCONIFEROUS TREEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEAUP PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINEBHS PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA` BLACK HILLS SPRUCECBS PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCECBS* PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCEERC JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDARNWS PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCENWS+ PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCESCP PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINESCP* PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINEWHP PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINEWHP+ PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINEORNAMENTAL TREEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEALS AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLANCE` AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMPFRS CARPINUS CAROLINIANA `J.N. UPRIGHT` TM FIRESPIRE BEECHPAG CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA PAGODA DOGWOODPFC MALUS X `PRAIRIFIRE` PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLEQUA POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPENRVB BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKRVB+ BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKSSC MALUS X `SPRING SNOW` SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLEWSB BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMPWSB* BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMPOVERSTORY TREEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEABM ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE` AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEABM+ ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE` AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEACC GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `HARVE` NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUSTCQA QUERCUS ROBUR X QUERCUS ALBA `CRIMSCHMIDT` CRIMSON SPIRE OAKELM ULMUS X `MORTON GLOSSY` TM TRIUMPH ELMFFM+ ACER SACCHARUM `FALL FIESTA` SUGAR MAPLEHON GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `SKYCOLE` SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTHON* GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `SKYCOLE` SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTKCY* GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `ESPRESSO` ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEETREENPO* QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAKNPO+ QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAKNWM ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD` NORTHWOOD MAPLERDL TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND` REDMOND AMERICAN LINDENRDO QUERCUS RUBRA NORTHERN RED OAKRDO+ QUERCUS RUBRA NORTHERN RED OAKSWO QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAKPLANT KEYThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:08pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSMINIMUM CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED: 558 IN.=(191, 796 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE - 13,257 GARAGE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE) / 320MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED: 564 IN.MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA REQUIRED: 101,639 SF= 290,398 SF LOT AREA *0.35MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA PROVIDED: 143,859 SFTREE RATIO (BUILDING STORIES: 4)SIZE: 6-7' HT 8-10' HT 11-14' HT(2-3") (3.5-4") (4.5-6")REQUIRED: 279"/ 50% 167.4"/ 30% 112.6"/ 20%PROPOSED: 281" 168" 115"PERENNIALS/SHRUBS REQUIRED: 10,164 SF= 101,639 SF LANDSCAPE AREA * 0.1PERENNIAL/SHRUBS PROVIDED: 17,350 SFREQUIRED PLANTING ISLANDS: 3,587 SF= 35,875 SF PARKING AREA *0.1PROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 3,630 SF(MINIMUM 150 SF)REQUIRED PLANTING ISLAND TREES: 9 TREES= 9 PLANTING ISLANDS x 1 TREEPROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 9 TREESDIVERSE SELECTION REQUIRED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY, ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUND COVERS PROVIDINGYEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTDIVERSE SELECTION PROVIDED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY, ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUND COVERS PROVIDINGYEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTSCREENING REQUIRED - LOAD SERVICE: MAY INCLUDE A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING - BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENTWITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED. NATURAL MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.SCREENING PROVIDED- LOAD SERVICE: A COMBINATION OF BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THEAREA TO BE SCREENED. PLANT MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.NORTH SEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH SAVANNA GRASS SEED MIX BY PRAIRIE RESTORATION INC. (TYP.)33-26122-112SAVALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)BOULDER (TYP.)K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC (SEE DETAIL)LAWN BOWLING- PERIMETER CURBING (SEE DETAIL)FLAGSTONE PAVERS (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)ABCDEFGHEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)BOULDER (TYP.)FLAGSTONE PAVERS (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC (SEE DETAIL)SOD (TYP.)CONIFEROUS SHRUBSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEGOJ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL` GREY OWL JUNIPERSGJ JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` SEA GREEN JUNIPERTAU TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` TAUTON YEWYEW TAXUS X MEDIA `EVERLOW` EVERLOW YEWDECIDUOUS SHRUBSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEANH HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` ANNABELLE HYDRANGEABLC ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRYDBH DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEGGD CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW` GARDEN GLOW DOGWOODGTF FORSYTHIA X `COURTASOL` TM GOLD TIDE FORSYTHIAIRD CORNUS SERICEA `ISANTI` ISANTI REDOSIER DOGWOODLDN PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARKOVA AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK` STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRYPJM RHODODENDRON `P.J.M.` PJM RHODODENDRONRM RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M. COMPACT` PJM COMPACTSEM SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` SEM FALSESPIREASUM RHUS TYPHINA `LACINATA` CUTLEAF STAGHORN SUMACSWN PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `SEWARD` TM SUMMER WINE SEWARD NINEBARKPERENNIALSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEAJG AJUGA REPTANS `BRONZE BEAUTY` BRONZE BEAUTY CARPET BUGLEAJS SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY` AUTUMN JOY SEDUMALM ALLIUM X `MILLENIUM` MILLENIUM ORNAMENTAL ONIONAMS AMSONIA X `BLUE ICE` BLUE ICE AMSONIAAST ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE` PURPLE CANDLES CHINESE ASTILBEBES RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM` BLACK-EYED SUSANBLH DICENTRA SPECTABILIS BLEEDING HEART PINK DICENTRABLT CAREX MORROWII `ICE BALLET` ICE BALLET SEDGEDAY HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES` APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILYEAH HOSTA X `EARTH ANGEL` EARTH ANGEL HOSTAFAS ASTILBE X ARENDSII `FANAL` FANAL ASTILBEHOS HOSTA X `KROSSA REGAL` KROSSA RAGAL HOSTAKFG CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSLMG ALCHEMILLA X `GOLD STRIKE` GOLD STRIKE LADY`S MANTLEMFG MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `PURPURESCENS` MISCANTHUS FLAME GRASSMNS SALVIA NEMEROSA `MAY NIGHT` MAY NIGHT SALVIAMSG MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `SILBERFEDER` MISCANTHUS SILVER FEATHER GRASSNMF ADIANTUM PEDATUM NORTHERN MAIDENHAIR FERNPAC PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS `GREEN CARPET` GREEN CARPET PACHYSANDRATAR SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS `TARA` TARA PRAIRIE DROPSEEDWLC NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` WALKERS LOW CATMINTARTIFICAL TURFBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEK9 ARTIFICAL TURF . K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSICSOD/SEEDBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESOD POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASSThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG December 23, 2020 - 4:10pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENTL101ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTSCALE: 1"=20'L1011 SEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH SAVANNA GRASS SEED MIX BY PRAIRIE RESTORATION INC. (TYP.)33-26122-112SAVALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)BOULDER (TYP.)K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC (SEE DETAIL)ABCDEFLANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)BOULDER (TYP.)FLAGSTONE PAVERS (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC (SEE DETAIL)SOD (TYP.)CONIFEROUS SHRUBSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEGOJ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL` GREY OWL JUNIPERSGJ JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` SEA GREEN JUNIPERTAU TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` TAUTON YEWYEW TAXUS X MEDIA `EVERLOW` EVERLOW YEWDECIDUOUS SHRUBSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEANH HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` ANNABELLE HYDRANGEABLC ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRYDBH DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEGGD CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW` GARDEN GLOW DOGWOODGTF FORSYTHIA X `COURTASOL` TM GOLD TIDE FORSYTHIAIRD CORNUS SERICEA `ISANTI` ISANTI REDOSIER DOGWOODLDN PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARKOVA AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK` STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRYPJM RHODODENDRON `P.J.M.` PJM RHODODENDRONRM RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M. COMPACT` PJM COMPACTSEM SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` SEM FALSESPIREASUM RHUS TYPHINA `LACINATA` CUTLEAF STAGHORN SUMACSWN PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `SEWARD` TM SUMMER WINE SEWARD NINEBARKPERENNIALSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEAJG AJUGA REPTANS `BRONZE BEAUTY` BRONZE BEAUTY CARPET BUGLEAJS SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY` AUTUMN JOY SEDUMALM ALLIUM X `MILLENIUM` MILLENIUM ORNAMENTAL ONIONAMS AMSONIA X `BLUE ICE` BLUE ICE AMSONIAAST ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE` PURPLE CANDLES CHINESE ASTILBEBES RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM` BLACK-EYED SUSANBLH DICENTRA SPECTABILIS BLEEDING HEART PINK DICENTRABLT CAREX MORROWII `ICE BALLET` ICE BALLET SEDGEDAY HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES` APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILYEAH HOSTA X `EARTH ANGEL` EARTH ANGEL HOSTAFAS ASTILBE X ARENDSII `FANAL` FANAL ASTILBEHOS HOSTA X `KROSSA REGAL` KROSSA RAGAL HOSTAKFG CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSLMG ALCHEMILLA X `GOLD STRIKE` GOLD STRIKE LADY`S MANTLEMFG MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `PURPURESCENS` MISCANTHUS FLAME GRASSMNS SALVIA NEMEROSA `MAY NIGHT` MAY NIGHT SALVIAMSG MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `SILBERFEDER` MISCANTHUS SILVER FEATHER GRASSNMF ADIANTUM PEDATUM NORTHERN MAIDENHAIR FERNPAC PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS `GREEN CARPET` GREEN CARPET PACHYSANDRATAR SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS `TARA` TARA PRAIRIE DROPSEEDWLC NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` WALKERS LOW CATMINTARTIFICAL TURFBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEK9 ARTIFICAL TURF . K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSICSOD/SEEDBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESOD POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS7 - WLC3 - SWN5 - SGJ3 - WLC52 - DAY5 - WLCThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENTL102ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTSCALE: 1"=20'L1021NORTH TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEPRX* 22 ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK` TM PRAIRIE EXPEDITION AMERICAN ELM B & B 3.5" CALPRX+ 2 ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK` TM PRAIRIE EXPEDITION AMERICAN ELM B & B 5" CAL.CONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEAUP 2 PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE B & B 6` HT.BHS 11 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA` BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT.CBS 5 PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE B & B 6` HT.CBS* 3 PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE B & B 8` HTERC 6 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR B & B 6` HT. 6` HT.NWS 5 PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE B & B 6` HT.NWS+ 2 PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE B & B 12` HTSCP 8 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE B & B 6` HT.SCP* 3 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE B & B 8` HTWHP 10 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 6` HT.WHP+ 3 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 12` HTORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEALS 1 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLANCE` AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMP B & B 6` HT.FRS 8 CARPINUS CAROLINIANA `J.N. UPRIGHT` TM FIRESPIRE BEECH B & B 6` HT.PAG 1 CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA PAGODA DOGWOOD B & B 2" CAL.PFC 5 MALUS X `PRAIRIFIRE` PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLE B & B 2" CAL.QUA 3 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN B & B 2" CAL.RVB 12 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 6` HT.RVB+ 6 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 12` HTSSC 9 MALUS X `SPRING SNOW` SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE B & B 2" CAL.WSB 2 BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMP B & B 6` HT.WSB* 5 BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMP B & B 8` HTOVERSTORY TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEABM 1 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE` AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL.ABM+ 3 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE` AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 5" CAL.ACC 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `HARVE` NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL.CQA 6 QUERCUS ROBUR X QUERCUS ALBA `CRIMSCHMIDT` CRIMSON SPIRE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL.ELM 9 ULMUS X `MORTON GLOSSY` TM TRIUMPH ELM B & B 2.5" CAL.FFM+ 3 ACER SACCHARUM `FALL FIESTA` SUGAR MAPLE B & B 5" CAL,HON 1 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `SKYCOLE` SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL.HON* 7 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `SKYCOLE` SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST B & B 3.5" CALKCY* 5 GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `ESPRESSO` ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEETREE B & B 3.5" CALNPO* 3 QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAK B & B 3.5" CALNPO+ 1 QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAK B & B 5" CAL.NWM 2 ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD` NORTHWOOD MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL.RDL 2 TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND` REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL.RDO 2 QUERCUS RUBRA NORTHERN RED OAK B & B 2.5" CAL.RDO+ 3 QUERCUS RUBRA NORTHERN RED OAK B & B 5" CAL.SWO 2 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL.PLANT SCHEDULEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPESCHEDULE -TREESL103ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN CONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEGOJ 17 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL` GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT. 4` O.C.SGJ 68 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT. 5` O.C.TAU 24 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` TAUTON YEW #5 CONT. 5` O.C.YEW 20 TAXUS X MEDIA `EVERLOW` EVERLOW YEW #5 CONT. 5` O.C.DECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEANH 32 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. 4` O.C.BLC 19 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` O.C.DBH 52 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. 3` O.C.GGD 17 CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW` GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 5` O.C.GTF 16 FORSYTHIA X `COURTASOL` TM GOLD TIDE FORSYTHIA #5 CONT. 4` O.C.IRD 37 CORNUS SERICEA `ISANTI` ISANTI REDOSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 5` O.C.LDN 45 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK #5 CONT. 4` O.C.OVA 10 AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK` STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` O.C.PJM 6 RHODODENDRON `P.J.M.` PJM RHODODENDRON #5 CONT. 4` O.C.RM 26 RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M. COMPACT` PJM COMPACT #2 CONT.SEM 31 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` SEM FALSESPIREA #5 CONT. 3` O.C.SUM 16 RHUS TYPHINA `LACINATA` CUTLEAF STAGHORN SUMAC #2 CONT. 5` O.C.SWN 8 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `SEWARD` TM SUMMER WINE SEWARD NINEBARK #5 CONT.PERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGSPACINGAJG 16 AJUGA REPTANS `BRONZE BEAUTY` BRONZE BEAUTY CARPET BUGLE FLAT 18" O.C. 18" o.c.AJS 29 SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY` AUTUMN JOY SEDUM #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c.ALM 79 ALLIUM X `MILLENIUM` MILLENIUM ORNAMENTAL ONION #1 CONT 14" O.C. 14" o.c.AMS 78 AMSONIA X `BLUE ICE` BLUE ICE AMSONIA #1 CONT 18" O.C. 18" o.c.AST 19 ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE` PURPLE CANDLES CHINESE ASTILBE #1 CONT. 36" O.C. 36" O.C. 36" o.c.BES 167 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM` BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c.BLH 8 DICENTRA SPECTABILIS BLEEDING HEART PINK DICENTRA #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.BLT 40 CAREX MORROWII `ICE BALLET` ICE BALLET SEDGE #1 CONT 18" O.C. 18" o.c.DAY 75 HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES` APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY #1 CONT. 15" OC 15" o.c.EAH 9 HOSTA X `EARTH ANGEL` EARTH ANGEL HOSTA #1 CONT. 40" O.C. 40" o.c.FAS 60 ASTILBE X ARENDSII `FANAL` FANAL ASTILBE #1 CONT 15" OC 15" o.c.HOS 16 HOSTA X `KROSSA REGAL` KROSSA RAGAL HOSTA #1 CONT 48" O.C. 48" o.c.KFG 55 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c.LMG 18 ALCHEMILLA X `GOLD STRIKE` GOLD STRIKE LADY`S MANTLE #1 CONT 20" O.C. 20" o.c.MFG 18 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `PURPURESCENS` MISCANTHUS FLAME GRASS #1 CONT 48" O.C. 48" o.c.MNS 32 SALVIA NEMEROSA `MAY NIGHT` MAY NIGHT SALVIA #1 CONT 15" O.C. 15" o.c.MSG 3 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `SILBERFEDER` MISCANTHUS SILVER FEATHER GRASS #1 CONT 36" O.C. 36" o.c.NMF 84 ADIANTUM PEDATUM NORTHERN MAIDENHAIR FERN #1 CONT 12" O.C. 12" o.c.PAC 80 PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS `GREEN CARPET` GREEN CARPET PACHYSANDRA FLAT 15" O.C. 15" o.c.TAR 181 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS `TARA` TARA PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.WLC 30 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c.ARTIFICAL TURFCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGSPACINGK9 435 SF ARTIFICAL TURF . K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC ARTIFICAL TURFSOD/SEEDCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGSPACINGSOD 42,125 SF POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SODThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:12pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPESCHEDULE -SHRUBS &PERENNIALSL104ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMN VIRGINIA SLATE FLAGSTONE (OR APPROVED EQUAL)ROCK MULCHCONCRETE SIDEWALK- SEE CIVIL4" CLASS 5COMPACTED SUBGRADE1" MINIMUM SAND SETTING BEDGEOTEXTILE FABRICThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEDETAILSL105ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNDOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHNOTES:2X ROOT BALL WIDTHSOD4" TOPSOILPREPARED PLANTING BED ANDBACKFILL SOIL(THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES:1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT.3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECTAND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEMGIRDLING ROOTS.4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILLVOIDS.6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESSSOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST.1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ORTHOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL.INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UPTO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAPAND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6"INTERVALS.5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THETOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT.REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOPTWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROMTHE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE.REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS.6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TOSETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER.PLANTING SOILTREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1051SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1052MULCH3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER12" STEEL EDGER SPIKETURF/SODSUBGRADE12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGERMULCHTURF/SODTOP OF EDGER TO BEFLUSH WITH SODPLANSECTIONSTEEL EDGER DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1053SPADED EDGE DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1054MULCH AT PLANTING AREASPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH,4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWNSIDELAWN GRASSFINISHED GRADE1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TOVERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTSOR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOSUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THEGUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONEYEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADESHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTHRATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-INMATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THETOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVEDDOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THEROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAKAPART PEAT POTS.12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POORBRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONEYEAR.15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIORTO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THENEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECTTOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGERTHAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE,SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUBPLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS.PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 3" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED DARKBROWN, OR APPROVED EQUAL. APPLY PREMENEGRENT HERBICIDE PRIOR TO MULCHPLACEMENT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, USE PREEN OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL.ROCK MULCH TO BE TRAP ROCK CHIPS (COLOR GREY), 3/4" TO 1-1/2" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3"DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BYTYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHEREAPPLICABLE).18. BOULDER TO BE TRAP ROCK (COLOR GREY) APPROXIMATELY 24" WIDE X 24" HIGH X 48" LONGOR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE, ROUGH FACE, AND FLAT BOTTOM, FIRMLY ANCHORED ON TOP OFGROUND AND LEVEL. OWNER/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE PRIOR TO DELIVERY.19. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGINGOR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES ANDSTAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEADAT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKSFOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TOCREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).20. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BESTANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALLTOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 ORGREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOTINDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.21. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMALPROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRSTYEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR.ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANTIS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDEWATER FOR CONTRACTOR.23. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARDAREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.24. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.25. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE,LESS THAN THE FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES,SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FORHEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUYSUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION ASREQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEPTREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIREDDEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SODRECITES 4" IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE AMONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ONWEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES.LANDSCAPE NOTESFLAGSTONE PAVERSSCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'L1055 1%2 X 10 WOODEN CURBING6 X 6 WOODEN SUPPORT WITH X DEGREE SYMBOL CHAMFERSOD- SEE LANDSCAPE PLANCONCRETE FOOTERPUTTING GREENS - BENT GRASS OVER AGGREGATE BASE (SEE DETAIL)DRAINTILE- SEE CIVIL12'6" MIN.WALLS1%BOLT WITH WASHER, RECESS HEAD (TYP.)NOTES:1. ALL WOOD TO BE TREATED. TREADED WOOD BELOW GRADE TO BEGROUND CONTACT, HEAVY DUTY.6" CLASS FIVECOMPACT SUBGRADEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEDETAILSL106ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNLAWN BOWLING - SECTIONSCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'L1063LAWN BOWLING - OVERVIEWSCALE: 1" = 5'2L106L106 PREPARED FORPHOTOMETRICPLANL107ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH0.5' LIGHT CONTOURLEGEND1.0' LIGHT CONTOUR PREPARED FORLIGHTINGDETAILSL108ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PREPARED FORLIGHTINGDETAILSL109ARDEN HILLS SENIORLIVINGNEW PERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAILS.dwg December 23, 2020 - 4:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DELIVERIES/ MOVE INGARAGE ENTRYPATIOTRASH4 STORY BUILDING1 STORY BUILDING1 STORY BUILDINGEXISTING PONDMONUMENT SIGNPINE TREE DRIVESNELLING AVENUE1418104101066 STALLSNEW PONDTRANSFORMERGENERATORLAWN BOWLINGDOG RUNPLAYGROUNDWALKING TRAILEXISTING PARKING5' - 0"8' - 0"STONE OVER 20"x20" CONC. PIER W/ (8) #6 VERT. W/ #3 TIES @ 12" OC4" PRECAST CAP4"3' - 6"2' - 4"2' - 0" 8' - 10" 2' - 0"6' - 2"2' CONC. FOOTING W/ 2 #5 CONT.3'x3'x1' CONC. FOOTINGS W/ 3#5 EA. WAYSITE PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLS 6&$/( L1SCALE1/2" = 1'-0"1MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATIONPARKING SUMMARYPARKING SPACES PROVIDED: SITE 66 SPACES GARAGE 29 SPACES TOTAL 95 SPACES ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING INDEXL1 SITE PLANA1 GARAGE & FIRST FLOOR PLANA2 SECOND FLOOR PLANA3 THIRD FLOOR PLANA4 FOURTH FLOOR PLANA5 ROOF PLANA6 BUILDING ELEVATIONSA7 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 8363$35,9$7(',1,1*62,/('/$81'5</$81'5<00&678',2$&&00&678',2$&&00&678',200&678',200&678',2'28%/(00&678',2$&&00&'28%/($&&00&&219(56$&&00&&219(56$00&678',2$&&00&678',200&&219(56$&&0 0&'28%/($&&00&'28%/($&&0 0&678',2$&&00&678',200&678',2$&&00&'28%/($&&00&678',2$&&00&678',200&678',2$&&1856($&7,9,7< 62))',5:(//1(66:25.5220&5'2)),&(2)),&(('2)),&(%($87<6$/21.,7&+(1/281*(00&75,3/(00&75,3/(.,7&+(1(77(.,7&+(1(77(.,7&+(1(77(&20021$5($&20021$5($38%',1,1*/2%%<9(67,%8/(&20021$5($%2&2)),&(0 0&'28%/($00&678',2$&&00&678',200&678',2$&&00&678',200&&219(56%00&&219(56$&&00&&219(56$00&&219(56$&&00&&219(56$6815220322/',1,1*322/0(&+322/6725:(//1(660$,/'(02.,7&+(16725$*('5<6725$*(.,7&+(12)),&(75$6+35,9$7(',1,1*:20(10(1&21)(5(1&(5220%5($.5220'$7$(/(9(48,36725$*(:20(16/2&.(50(16/2&.(53+<67+(5$3<6725678',2$%('*%('(%(''(1& %('+%(''(1%%('+%('(678',2$%('(%('(+286(.((3,1*'$7$ 75$6+&20021$5($PATIO75$6+(/(9$725(48,30(17*$5$*(0(&+(/(&767$,567$,529 STALLS6725$*(GARAGE & FIRST FLOOR PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"11ST FLOOR PLANBUILDING AREA (Gross SF)Level AreaGARAGE 13344 SF1ST FLOOR 64681 SF2ND FLOOR 38946 SF3RD FLOOR 38040 SF4TH FLOOR 37379 SFGrand total 192390 SFUNIT MIX BY TYPE - MEMORY CARE-01 - MC STUDIO 17 52%-02 - MC CONVERSION 8 24%-03 - MC DOUBLE 6 18%-04 - MC TRIPLE 2 6%Grand total 33 100%UNIT MIX BY TYPE1 BED 49 43%1 BED + DEN 12 11%2 BED 37 33%STUDIO 15 13%Grand total 113 100%A1SCALE1/16" = 1'-0"2GARAGE 8383$&7,9,7,(6(;(5&,6('$1&(+$//OPEN TO BELOW678',2$678',2&%('(%(''(1& %('+%(''(1%%('+ %(')%('$%('%%('$%('&$&&678',2%%('$%('$ %('$%('$%(')%('$%('%%('(678',2$%(''(1$%('%%('$%('$%('$%('&%('(%,//,$5'6&20021$5($63$/,%5$5<0(1:20(11856(675$6+'$7$7+($7(5%('*$&&+286(.((3,1*'$7$0$,172)),&(ROOFROOFROOF67$,5%('(ROOF DECKSECOND FLOOR PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"12ND FLOOR PLANA2 6725$*(75$6+&+$3(/ %(''(1$%('%%('$%('$678',2$%('*%('$%('$%('%%('$%(')%('$678',2$%('(%('$%('%%('$%('$%('$'$7$%(')%('$%('$%('$6725$*( %('% %('+%(''(1&%(''(1%""%('(%('(%('(678',2'$&&(66678',2%%(')6725/2&.(56 '$7$ROOF%('+ %('+THIRD FLOOR PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"13RD FLOOR PLANA3 678',2$%('(%('(%('(6725$*(%(''(1$%('%%('&678',2$%('*%('$%('%%('$%('$%('$%('(678',2' %('$%('$%('%%('%%('$%(')%('$%(')%('$%('$%('% %('%%(')678',2%%(''(1'678',2(OPEN TO CHAPEL BELOW'$7$6725$*(75$6+6725/2&.(56%('+ %(''(1&'$7$%('+%(''(1%FOURTH FLOOR PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"14TH FLOOR PLANA4 ROOFTOP MECH. UNITSROOF DECKUPPER MECH. UNIT SCREEN WALLLOWER MECH. UNIT SCREEN 2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"6"3' - 0"2' - 0"4"x4" STL. TUBE POST @ 6'-6" O.C.4"x4" STL. TUBE4"x4" STL. TUBEPREFINISHED CORRUGATED MTL. PANEL4"x4" STL. TUBE BRACE @ MIDDLE POST4' - 6"2' - 0"ROOF PLANArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"1ROOF PLANA5SCALE3/4" = 1'-0"2LOWER ROOF RTU SCREENSCALE3/4" = 1'-0"3UPPER ROOF SCREEN 1ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"STONE #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5STONE #1BRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2STONE #1 BRACKETFIBER CEMENT SIDING #54TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1BRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2STANDING SEAM MTL. ROOFALUMINUM RAILINGFIBER CEMENT SIDING #4 ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESFIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5VINYL WINDOWFIBER CEMENT SIDING #1 FIBER CEMENT #5BRICK #1STONE #19' - 10"ROOF MIDPOINT153'-4 3/4"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2STONE 1,842 SF 12%BRICK 2,066 SF 13%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 7,895 SF 51%GLASS 3,727 SF 24%TOTAL 15,530 SF 100%MATERIAL AREASEXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEBRICK #1:MANUFACTURER:COLOR:SIZE:-HEBRON-BRANDYWINE-UTILITYSTONE #1:TYPE:COLOR:METAL SOFFIT & FASCIA:MANUFACTURER:COLOR:-CHILTON- WEATHERED EDGE NATURAL STONEROLLEXSNOWMISTMORTAR:-STANDARDFIBER CEMENT SIDING #1:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:WOODTONELAP SIDINGROSEWOODFIBER CEMENT SIDING #2:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:JAMES HARDIE8" LAP SIDINGJAMES HARDIE - CARMELALUMINUM DECK, RAILINGS AND SCREEN/ RAILING ASSEMBLIES:PICKET RAIL:COLOR: BRONZEEXPOSURE:5"SQUARE LANDSCAPE BLOCK:MANUFACTURER:FINISH:COLOR:---EXPOSURE: 7"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #3:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:WOODTONEVERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN 12" O.C.ROSEWOODFIBER CEMENT SIDING #4:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:JAMES HARDIEVERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN 12" O.C.JAMES HARDIE- CARMELFIBER CEMENT SIDING #5:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:COLOR:CERTAINTEEDLANDMARKWEATHERED WOODARCHITECTURAL SHINGLE:EXPOSURE:MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:JAMES HARDIE1" THICK, 4" @ WINDOW VERTICALS AND SILLS, 6" AT WINDOW HEADS JAMES HARDIE - FADING TANFIBER CEMENT COMPOSITE TRIM:MANUFACTURER:COLOR:THERMOTECHWHITEVINYL WINDOWS:MANUFACTURER:COLOR:-CHAMPAGNE ANONDIZEDALUMINUM DOORS & WINDOWS:STANDING SEAM ROOF: MANUFACTURER:TYPE:PAINT:UNACLADUC-3MANSARD BROWNMANUFACTURER:COLOR:-TBDARCHITECTURAL PRECAST SILLS & CAPS:JAMES HARDIELAP SIDINGJAMES HARDIE - RICH ESPRESSO7"1ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4FIBER CEMENT SIDING #14TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5VINYL WINDOWSPAINTED METAL LOUVERBRICK #1ASPHALT SHINGLESBRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2BRACKETROOF MIDPOINT152'-1 1/2"8' - 6 3/4"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2STONE 26 SF .5%BRICK 626 SF 7.5%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 5,626 SF 67%GLASS2,050 SF 25%TOTAL 8,330 SF 100%MATERIAL AREASSTONE #11ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"4TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESBRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5PORCH SCREENVINYL WINDOWSTONE #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESBRICK #1STONE #1VINYL WINDOWFIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1BRICK #1ROOF MIDPOINT152'-1 1/2"8' - 6 3/4"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1ALUM. BALCONYSTONE 287 SF 5%BRICK 705 SF 13%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 3,185 SF 57%GLASS1,403 SF 25%TOTAL 5,580 SF 100%MATERIAL AREASBUILDING ELEVATIONSArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"1EAST ELEVATIONSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"3NORTH ELEVATIONA6SCALE1/16" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION- NORTH WING 1ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"BRICK #1FIBERCEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4STONE #14TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"BRICK #1ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESFIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLESVINYL WINDOWFIBERCEMENT SIDING #5GARAGE DOORFIBER CEMENT SIDING #3FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1STONE #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2GARAGE89' -6"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1ROOF MIDPOINT152'-1 1/2"RTU SCREEN WALLRTU SCREEN WALLFIBERCEMENT SIDING #1ALUM. BALCONYSTONE 636 SF 4%BRICK 1,730 SF 11%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 9,112 SF 61%GLASS 3,840 SF 24%TOTAL 15,318 SF 100%MATERIAL AREAS1ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4 FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1 STONE #14TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"STONE #1STONE #1 VINYL WINDOWFIBER CEMENT SIDING #1STONE #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5 FIBER CEMENT SIDING #4FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1ALUM. BALCONYFIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5 BRACKETROOF MIDPOINT152'-1 1/2"STONE 477 SF 5%BRICK 0 SF 0%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 7,450 SF 73%GLASS 2,225 SF 22%TOTAL 10,152 SF 100%MATERIAL AREAS1ST FLOOR100' -0"ROOF143' -6 3/4"2ND FLOOR111' -10 5/8"3RD FLOOR123' -8 1/2"4TH FLOOR134' -6 3/8"ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLEFIBER CEMENT SIDING #2PAINTED METAL LOUVERVINYL WINDOWSTONE #1BRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1BRICK #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1FIBER CEMENT SIDING #5FIBER CEMENT SIDING #2FIBER CEMENT SIDING #1BRICK #1ROOF MIDPOINT152'-1 1/2"STONE #1PORCH SCREENSTONE #1STONE 397 SF 5%BRICK 1,370 SF 17%CEMENT BOARD SIDING 4,468 SF 65%GLASS1,875 SF 23%TOTAL 8,110 SF 100%MATERIAL AREASBUILDING ELEVATIONSArden Hills, MinnesotaNEW PERSPECTIVE ARDEN HILLSSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"1WEST ELEVATIONSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"3SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION- SOUTH WINGA7 ͳ͵ʹͲǤͲͺͷ Ǧʹ Ǥ Ǧʹ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧʹ Ǥ ʹ ǡȋ ǡǡȌǡǡ ǡǡǤǡ Ǥ̶ ʹ ̶ Ǥ ǡ ǤȋͳʹȀ͵ȀͲͺȌ Ǥͳ Ǥ ʹ ǡ ǣ Ǥ ǡǡ ȋȌ Ǥ ̶ ʹ ̶ Ǧʹ Ǥ Ǥ ͳ͵ʹͲǤͲͷǤ Ǥǡǡ ʹͶǡʹͲͲͺǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͳǤ ǡǡ Ȁ Ǣ ʹǤ ǡ ǡǡ ǡǡ ǡǢ ͵Ǥ ͳ͵ʹͷ Ǣ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǤʹǤ Attachment D Ǥȋ ǡ ͳ͵ʹͲǤͲͷǡǦʹ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥȋ ǡ ͳ͵ʹͲǤͲͷǡǦʹ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧʹ ǣ ͳǤ ͷͲǡͲͲͲ Ǥ ʹǤǡǡ ǡǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǡǡǡ ǡ ǡǡǤ Ǥ ͵Ǥ Ǣ ͶǤǢ ͷǤǢ Ǥǡ ǡǡǡ ǡ ǡ Ǣǡ Ǥ ̵ Ǥ Ǥ͵ ǦǤ ͳ͵ʹͷǤͲͶ Ǧ Ǥ ȋͳǡ͵ʹͲȌǦ ǣ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧǡ Ǥ Ǥ ͳ͵ʹͷǤͲͶ Ǧʹ Ǥ ǤͶ ȀǤ ͳ͵Ͷͷͳ͵ͷͷǤͲͶ͵ǡȀ ǣ Ǥ Ǣ Ǥ Ǣ Ǥ ͳ͵ʹͷǤͲͷͳǤ ǤͷǤȋ ȀȀͳͳȀȀȌ Ǥ ͳ͵ʹͷǡǦ ǣ ͳǤ Ǣ ʹǤ Ǣ ͵Ǥ ͷͷͲǢ ͶǤ ǤͷǤ ǤǤ ͳ͵ʹͷǡǦ ǣ ͳǤ Ǥ Ǣ ʹǤ Ǥ Ǣ ͵Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Parking Study It is our understanding that our parking needs may differ from that of the city code. The following information is meant to show how New Perspective views its parking needs as it relates to its operations. The below calculations were given to the architect when we began our site planning process. The building program is proposed to include residents who are Independent, who might need assistance and those who may need assisted living and have some form of dementia. 53 of the units are anticipated to be Independent Living and 60 of the units would be Assisted Living. The balance would be memory care. The current plans indicate 66 surface parking stalls and 29 enclosed parking stalls for a total of 95. New Perspective Senior Living has consistently applied the below formulas for its parking needs, and it has proved successful in their last 6 communities. Resident Parking x Independent Living typically requires .85 stalls per unit (.85 Stalls / Unit * 53 Units = 45 Parks) x Assisted Living typically requires - .25 stalls per unit (.25 Stalls / Unit * 60 Units = 15 Parks) x Memory Care requires no parking for residents (Zero Parks Required) Total Resident Parks Required: 60 Parks Staff Parking We calculate our staff parking by taking our busiest shift, which will have approximately 26 employees, and 50% of our next shift 16 for staff transitions. (26+8=34 Staff Parks) Total Staff Parks: 34 Parks Visitor Parking We have typically allocated 1 stall per 10 units in our buildings. (140 Units / 10 Units Per stall = 14) Parking Summary: NPSL Program Requirement Proposed Per Plan Delta Resident 60 Staff 34 Visitor 14 Total Parks 108 95 -13 $WWDFKPHQW( The chart below compares the parking at similar New Perspective properties. New Perspective Senior Living Elgin Franklin Waukesha West Fargo Howard North Shore NPSL Last 6 Projects IL 55 53 55 40 40 51 AL 52 50 39 30 45 50 MC 33 48 47 47 47 48 Total Units 140 151 141 117 132 149 Elgin Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 55 52 33 34 14 Parks / Unit 0.85 0.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 46.75 13 0 34 14 108 Franklin Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 53 50 55 34 15.8 Parking / Unit 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 53 12.5 0 34 15.8 115 Waukesha Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 55 39 47 34 14.1 Parking / Unit 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 55 9.75 0 34 14.1 113 West Fargo Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 40 30 47 34 11.7 Parking / Unit 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 40 7.5 0 34 11.7 93 Howard Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 40 45 47 34 13.2 Parking / Unit 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 40 11.25 0 34 13.2 98 North Shore Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Staff Visitor Parks Required Resident Units 51 50 48 34 14.9 Parking / Unit 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Total Parks 51 12.5 0 34 14.9 112 ĂƚĞ͗:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϮϭ dŽ͗DŝŬĞDƌŽƐůĂ͕ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͕DE͕ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ &ƌŽŵ͗ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐZ ͕>> Z ͗DĞŵŽƌLJĂƌĞhŶŝƚ^ŝnjŝŶŐ ĞĂƌDŝŬĞ͕ ƐĂĨŽůůŽǁƵƉƚŽƚŚĞ:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϲƚŚƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͕ǁĞǁĂŶƚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞDĞŵŽƌLJĂƌĞǁŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJĂƐŝƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐƚŽƚŚĞƐŝnjŝŶŐ ŽĨƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞƵŶŝƚƐ͘ƐǁĂƐĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞĂŐƌŽƵƉŽĨ ŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞƐƚƵĚŝŽƵŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚƌĂŶŐĞŝŶƐŝnjĞĨƌŽŵϯϳϭͲϯϵϭ^&͘dŚĞƌĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞƵŶŝƚƐƌĂŶŐĞ ĨƌŽŵϰϮϴͲϵϭϴ^&͕ĚĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƵŶŝƚƚLJƉĞƐ͘ĞůŽǁŝƐĂƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽƵƚůŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞƐŝnjŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƵŶŝƚƐ ĂŶĚƌĞĂƐŽŶƐǁŚLJƚŚĞLJĂƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂďŽǀĞ͘ dŚĞĐŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞEĞǁWĞƌƐƉĞĐƚŝǀĞ^ĞŶŝŽƌ>ŝǀŝŶŐŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƚŽďƵŝůĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ĐĂŶůŝǀĞůŝĨĞŽŶƉƵƌƉŽƐĞ͘dŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚŝŶĂǁĂLJƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐĂŶĂĐƚŝǀĞůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞ͘dŚĞ ŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŚĂǀĞĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨĐŽŵŵŽŶĂƌĞĂĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌƵƐĞ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐͲƐƵŶƌŽŽŵ͕ƐƉĂ͕ ďĞĂƵƚLJƐĂůŽŶ͕ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĚŝŶŝŶŐƌŽŽŵĨŽƌĨĂŵŝůLJŐĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐƐ͕ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJƌŽŽŵƐ͕ϯƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞŬŝƚĐŚĞŶĞƚƚĞͬĚŝŶŝŶŐ ĂƌĞĂƐ͕ϰůŝǀŝŶŐͬůŽƵŶŐĞĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĨŝƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂŶĚĞŶƚĞƌƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƚǁŽůĂƌŐĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚĂƌĞĂƐ ǁŝƚŚďĞĂƵƚŝĨƵůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĂŶĚƉůĂŶƚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐ͘ dŽƚĂůĐŽŵŵŽŶĂƌĞĂ;ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚƐͿŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdž͘ϭϱ͕ϳϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͘dŚĂƚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐ ƚŽĂƉƉƌŽdž͘ϰϳϲƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƵŶŝƚ;ϭϱ͕ϳϬϬͬϯϯƵŶŝƚƐͿ͘dĂŬŝŶŐƚŚŝƐŝŶƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞĂǀĞƌĂŐĞƐƉĂĐĞ ƉĞƌƵŶŝƚĨŽƌƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞƵŶŝƚƐŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdž͘ϴϰϳͲϴϲϳƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘ ĞůŽǁŝƐĂůƐŽĂƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƵĚŝŽƵŶŝƚƐŝnjĞƐŽĨŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂůŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ƐLJŽƵǁŝůů ƐĞĞ͕ƚŚĞƐŝnjŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƵŶŝƚƐĂƌĞǀĞƌLJƐŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽŽƵƌƐŝnjĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŝŶƐŽŵĞĐĂƐĞƐŝƚŝƐůĞƐƐ͘dŚŝƐŝƐĂĐŽŵŵŽŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞƚLJƉĞƐŽĨĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂƐƚŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŝƐƚŽĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽƐƉĞŶĚŵŽƌĞƚŝŵĞŝŶ ƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶĂƌĞĂƐ͘ DĞŵŽƌLJĂƌĞhŶŝƚ^ŝnjŝŶŐŽĨ>ŽĐĂůDĞŵŽƌLJĂƌĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ĂƌĚŝŐĂŶZŝĚŐĞ^ĞŶŝŽƌ>ŝǀŝŶŐ;>ŝƚƚůĞĂŶĂĚĂ͕DEͿʹ^ƚƵĚŝŽʹϯϮϵͲϰϲϴƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘ ŚĞƌƌLJǁŽŽĚWŽŝŶƚĞŽĨZŽƐĞǀŝůůĞ;ZŽƐĞǀŝůůĞ͕DEͿʹ^ƚƵĚŝŽʹϯϲϱͲϱϭϳƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘ ĂŐůĞƌĞƐƚ^ĞŶŝŽƌ>ŝǀŝŶŐ;ZŽƐĞǀŝůůĞ͕DEͿʹ^ƚƵĚŝŽʹϯϴϮͲϯϵϲƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘ ƌŽŽŬĚĂůĞEŽƌƚŚKĂŬƐ;EŽƌƚŚKĂŬƐ͕DEͿʹWƌŝǀĂƚĞ^ƵŝƚĞʹϯϭϱƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘ /ĨƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂŶLJĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐŽƌĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞĚŽŶŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĂƚĞƚŽƌĞĂĐŚŽƵƚ͘ &ůŽƌĞŶƚ/ůĂnjŝ ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐZ ͕>> Attachment F From: To:AH Planning; Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:15:10 AM Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. I realize I should have sent this email earlier however it is an issue that needs to be addressed for future building. This is in regards to the building of the New Perspectives Senior Living application. Does the City of Arden Hills and surrounding areas need another expensive Senior type of living? It seems to me that we should be looking at building some affordable housing for not only seniors but families. How many Seniors can really afford this type of housing that an independent apartment costs $3-4,000 per month. Also this new complex will be across Highway 51 from the back of my lot — where there now are many trees and places for wild animals and nature. Instead there will be a four-story building on the horizon. Is this the type of future housing we should be promoting in our City. I am 88 years of age and will not be living here in my home for another 20-40 years. I would like to know there will be affordable housing for families that will make use of our wonderful neighborhoods and school systems and this excellent city. Thank you for taking the time to read my opinions. Pauline C Richards 3544 Glenarden Rd Arden Hills MN 55112 $WWDFKPHQW* MEMORANDUM City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 1 of 17 Requested Action Arden Hills RE, LLC (“Applicant”) on behalf of New Perspective Senior Living has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Zoning Code Amendment for a project located at 2 Pine Tree Drive (“Subject Property”). The Applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) story, 146 unit multi-family senior living facility with underground parking. The housing units will include independent living, assisted living and memory care. The Subject Property is zoned B-2 General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. Background At its June 22, 2020 meeting the City Council approved Bethel University’s proposal for a Master Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat at 12 Pine Tree Drive (Bethel’s Anderson Center). The approval subdivided the existing property into three (3) lots of record, one (1) lot of record for the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property. The Applicant is proposing to develop Lot 1 as shown on the image below and in attachment C. The Subject Property is 6.4 acres and is currently owned by Bethel University. The Subject Property currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands. A segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system runs through the site as shown below. DATE: January 6, 2021 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Mike Mrosla – Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBECT: Planning Case # 20-022 –Public Hearing Required Applicant: Arden Hills RE, LLC Property Location: 2 Pine Tree Drive Request: Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment Attachment H ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 2 of 17 Proposal and Use: The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living. New Perspective Senior Living owns and manages 24 senior living communities throughout the Midwest. The proposed facility in Arden Hills will offer independent care, assisted living, and memory care. The project also includes such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dog run, playground for young visitors, lawn bowling, salon and spa, bistro/bar and onsite physical therapy and wellness services. This facility will staff 80 employees and the anticipated max shift size is 34. Staff will be onsite 24 hours a day. Dwelling Units The Applicant is requesting to construct a senior living facility with 146 units, which includes 53 independent living, 60 assisted living and 33 memory care units. A breakdown of each area and amenities is outlined below: x The memory care wing is located on the left side of first floor and consists of 33 units. The memory care suites are specially designed to assist residents that require memory care services. The memory care wing is designed in neighborhoods, allowing for care to be delivered in smaller environments 24 hours per day. The four (4) neighborhoods surround landscaped courtyards. Each neighborhood includes a living room (common area) and a dining room where meals are served. The unit type are as follows: 17 – Studio units (371 – 391 sq. ft.) 8 – Conversion units (428 – 448 sq. ft.) – Conversion units include a microwave, sink and a refrigerator. 6 – Double units (478 – 656 sq. ft.) 2 – Triple units (914 – 918 sq. ft.) o Other amenities include spa, beauty salon, private dining room and a sunroom. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 3 of 17 x The independent and assisted living units are located floors one (1) through four (4) of the building. The unit type are as follows: 15 – Studio units (537 – 640 sq. ft.) 47 – (1) bedroom (673 – 790 sq. ft.) 12 – (1) bedroom plus den (861 – 952 sq. ft.) 38 – (2) bedrooms (973 – 1,212 sq. ft.) o The first floor is where the majority of the amenities are located including wellness center, pool, beauty salon, pub, lounge, bistro, and formal dining with a demonstration kitchen. In addition, the first floor offers an outdoor dining patio. o The 2nd floor is where the theater, activities center, library, billiards, common area and exercise/dance hall and spa are located. o The chapel is located on the 3rd floor. o Select units on the 2nd through 4th floor have screened porches and balconies. o The garage is approximately 13,344 square feet and contains 29 parking stalls. The garage provides parking for independent living units and staff. Refuse is collected in the garage level in a trash room. Plan Evaluation The proposed land use application requires Site Plan review and a Conditional Use Permit for a multiple family dwelling use in the B-2 District. In addition, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for new developments and assisted living uses in the B-2 District. A PUD would be required for performance standard flexibility with the minimum density, minimum lot area per unit and maximum building height restrictions. In addition, a Zoning Code Amendment is required for the maximum dwelling unit density per net acre allowed. 1. Comprehensive Plan The Subject Property is guided as Community Mixed Use (CMU) in the Land Use Plan. The area is designated for a broad range of retail, shopping, services, and office space to meet the needs of the community and surrounding areas. This area may also include high density housing with a potential density of twelve (12) to twenty (20) units per acre. The district is expected to have a total of ten (10) to fifty (50) percent of the uses in the area be residential. According to the Comprehensive Plan the total area of the CMU is 100 acres. Currently, there is one residential use with 6.24 acres (1201 County Rd E W) or 6.24% of the total area. The addition of the proposed use of the Subject Property with 6.4 acres would bring the total use to 12.91%, which meets the intent of the district. The proposed development is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: x Land Use Goal Policy: Preserve the stability and quality of the city's neighborhoods while allowing for redevelopment that is complimentary to existing development. Even though the proposed project is not a redevelopment project it meets the intent of the policy as the proposed land use is compatible with the adjacent uses. Multi-family developments such as proposed senior living facility are generally used as a transition between the commercial and residential neighborhoods. The location between the two uses allows residents the ease of access to shopping, restaurants, entertainment on the surrounding commercial land uses. The proposed project is complementary to the existing high density of Hunters Park Condos ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 4 of 17 x Housing Goal Policy: Encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. The proposed development provides residents with another opportunity to age in the community. The proposed development provides life-cycle housing as it offers independent senior housing and transitional care into more intense care. Residents won’t need to relocate to different units as they can add additional services to their unit as they need them. However, if a resident requires memory care they will be asked to relocate to a memory care suite. The suites are specially designed to accommodate the resident’s needs. In addition, the Land Use Plan discusses the “Guiding Plan for the B-2 District”. In March 2008, the City completed a visioning and planning process for the B-2 District, which generally includes the properties near County Road E between Lexington Avenue and Hamline Avenue/Highway 51. The “Guiding Plan for the B-2 District” is a long-term vision for the future redevelopment of this corridor. The plan states as this corridor ages, market-initiated redevelopment is anticipated. The plan also discusses the need for senior housing in the community and recommends that any new construction of senior housing within the B-2 district be built as a combination of senior housing types (independent care, assisted living and memory case) to form of a senior campus such as this proposal. Park and Recreation Goal Policies: x Develop, maintain, and encourage the use of a system of neighborhood parks and pathways that are safe and engaging, including connecting neighborhood paths to regional paths, and connecting neighborhoods, parks and other destinations through a City-wide path system. The Bethel Anderson Center property has numerous existing trails throughout the property. The existing trails are private and were not previously dedicated to the public nor were they required to be available to the public as part of the development’s approval. However, during the 2013 CUP approvals Bethel committed to continue to share these trails with the community and that agreement will not be modified as a part of this proposal. As part of this development application the developer we be removing the existing trail and reconstructing a public trail connection shown in green on the following image (Attachment D). ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 5 of 17 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process A Planned Unit Development (PUD) District promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity and relaxing the strict application of standard zoning and subdivision requirements, in exchange for a project that better forwards the goals and purpose of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In granting a PUD request, the City may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards, which should bring the project in conformity with the purposes of the City Code. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. While PUDs may be allowed in any district, they are required for some types of development in certain districts. 3. Zoning Code Amendment The Applicant is proposing a Zoning Code Amendment for the maximum dwelling unit density per net acre allowed. The Maximum density allowed within the B-2 and CMU District is 20 units per acre. The total proposed density is 23 units per acre or 146 units. However, the Applicant is proposing a different standard for the 33 memory care units. The Applicant is requesting that memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to a shared central dining and living areas - to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units within the B-2 district only. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the B2 zoning district and CMU district in land use plan. In other cities ordinances, assisted living and memory care units are often considered less than one (1) unit because of the lack of apartment-like amenities such as a full kitchen and living area. In addition, it is common for memory care units to have a reduced footprint as the units are specially designed for residents that require memory care services. City code section 1325.045, Subdivision 1 requires efficiency (studio) units to be a minimum of five hundred and fifty (550) square feet. The Applicant is proposing units that range in size from 371 to 391 square feet. The Applicant and staff are proposing the zoning code amendment below and in Attachment E. 1320.085 Special Requirements for the B-2 General Business District. Subd. 5 Assisted Living Additional Planned Unit Development Criteria. (revised X/X/XXXX) A. In addition to meeting the requirements of Section 1325, multi-family assisted living residential projects may incorporate memory care units meeting the following: 1. Each unit consist of private bedrooms with bathrooms; 2. Each units is open to a shared central dining and living areas; 3. Units may be less than 550 square feet; 4. Memory care units shall be considered to be equivalent to .5 dwelling units. 4. Conditional Use Permit A Conditional Use Permit is required for a multiple family dwelling use in the B-2 District. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 6 of 17 the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors and findings: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; The proposed use does not conflict with the business functions of the surrounding uses and will not pose a significant detrimental risk or nuisance to the health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of adjacent lands. New Perspective Senior Living has an existing relationship with Bethel University. The new facility is adjacent to Bethel’s Anderson Center and will provide additional educational opportunities to their students. 3. Drainage; The proposed site plan does not negatively impact drainage on adjacent properties and the submitted stormwater onsite meets the quantity and quality standards. The Applicant is currently going through the Rice Creek Watershed approval process. 4. Population density; The Subject Property is guided as Community Mixed Use (CMU) in the Land Use Plan. The area is designated for a broad range of retail, shopping, services, and office space to meet the needs of the community and surrounding areas. This area may also include high density housing with a potential density of twelve (12) to twenty (20) units per acre. The Applicant is proposing requesting the memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to a shared central dining and living areas - to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; The proposed building materials exceed the B2 material requirement as identified in the Design Standards. The ordinance 75 percent of the building exterior be constructed of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone (or synthetic equivalent), decorative concrete plank (cement board siding), transparent glass or any combination thereof. The proposed building is 100% approved materials. Multi-family developments such as proposed senior living facility are generally used to transition between the commercial and residential neighborhoods. This allows residents ease of access to shopping, restaurants, and entertainment on the surrounding commercial land uses. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 7 of 17 6. Adjoining land values; The proposed development is not anticipated to negatively impact adjacent property values. 7. Park dedications where applicable; High density residential requires a park dedication of 20 percent of the total land. A cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required at the discretion of the City. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Planning Case 20-022 for New Perspective Senior Living proposed development at 2 Pine Tree Drive is consistent with the purpose and intent with the policies within the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the B-2 Zoning District and Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. 5. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review A. Lot Area and Dimensions – Meets Requirements The Subject Property exceeds the minimum lot area and dimensions required for a development within the B-2 District. The total area of the Subject Property is 6.4 acres, or approximately 290,545 square feet. The Land Use Chart in Section 1320.05 highlights that minimum requirements for properties in the B-2 District. The maximum structure coverage allowed in the district is forty-five (45) percent of the lot. The proposed structure coverage is 64,644 square feet or 22 percent. Up to eighty (80) percent of the lot can be developed on with impervious coverage. According to the site plan submitted by the Applicant, 3.4 acres or 53 percent of the site will be impervious. B. Building and Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements In the B-2 District, there is a 20-foot front building setback and rear setback and both side setbacks combined must equal 20 feet. The principal structure exceeds building setback requirements for its district. The proposed parking lot exceeds all parking lot setback requirements for the district. Ordinance requires all access drives to be setback five (5) feet from the property line. The proposed access drive on the west side of the proposed building and adjacent to Minnesota State Highway 51/Snelling Avenue North serves as the delivery and pickup access of the proposed building. The proposed access drive meets the minimum five (5) foot setback from the property line. In addition, the proposed access drive is 24 feet wide. This additional width is needed to accommodate vehicles making pickups and deliveries at the loading docks. The Applicant provided truck movements plan is shown on the next page and in Attachment E (Pg. C402). As a condition of approval, in the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 8 of 17 C. Building Height - Flexibility requested Section 1305.04 of the City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance from the average elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs.” These measurements are illustrated in the drawing on the next page. The Applicant is proposing a building that would be four (4) stories in height with a pitched roof design. The proposed pitched roof provides residents with a home-like residential aesthetic, where as a flat roof provides an institutional look and feel. The proposed facility would have a building height of 55 feet as measured from the finished floor elevation to the midpoint. Under the City Zoning Code, a building in the B-2 district can have a maximum height of up to 50 feet to the midpoint, so the Applicants are requesting flexibility for an additional 5 feet in height. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 9 of 17 The table below shows building heights for other developments in the community. *Not including penthouse and cellular equipment D. Density and District Minimum Lot Area per Unit Requirements - Flexibility requested According to City Code Section 1320.06, the Minimum Lot Area per Unit allowed within the B-2 District is 2,178 square feet per unit. The Applicant’s proposal of 146 units would entail a development with approximately 2,032 square feet per unit. However, the Applicant is requesting flexibility with this standard because the 33 memory care units on-site are smaller studio style units and do not have full kitchens and living spaces like standard apartment units. If the memory care units were excluded from the calculation of Minimum Lot Area per Unit, the development would meet the district provision with 2,287 square feet per unit. The maximum density allowed within the B-2 and CMU District is 20 units per acre. However, the Applicant is requesting flexibility with this provision. The total proposed density is 23 units per acre or 146 units. As previously discussed, the Applicant is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. In other cities’ ordinances, assisted living, memory care and skilled nursery units are often considered less than 1 unit because of the lack of amenities of a standard apartment unit such as a full kitchen and living area. If we apply the .5 units for density purposes, the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. *Unit count is rounded down as you cannot construct .23 of a unit. E. Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional CUP Criteria – Flexibility requested According to City Code Section 1320.45, the number of efficiency (studio) units in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total number of apartments. The Applicant is requesting 32 studio units or 22 percent. Development Name Mid-Point Summit Development 46 ft. Johanna Shores Senior Living 56 ft. E Street Flats 44 ft. Arden Flats Apartments 55 ft. Anderson Center 60 ft.* Land Use Site Acreage Number of Proposed Units Proposed Density Per Acre Proposed Memory Care Units Proposed Memory Care Equivalent Units Number of Equivalent Units Proposed Density Per Acre 146-16.5= 129.5 units 129.5 units/6.4 AC = 20.23* CMU 6.4 146 23 33 .5 16.5 20 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 10 of 17 F. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) – Meets Requirements The FAR is obtained by dividing the total sum of all the building's floor areas by the lot area. Under the current Zoning Code, the maximum FAR for a property in the B-2 District is 0.8. The FAR is defined as the sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building, but not including decks and garages. The proposed floor area of the building minus the garage is 179,046 square feet. The Subject Property has an approximant area of 278,784 square feet, which means that the property has a FAR of 0.64. 6. Design Standards A. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Applicant has submitted a lighting plan that identifies pole heights and lumen levels at the property lines. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style and downward directed with flush lenses. The Applicant is proposing to use LED lighting to illuminate the parking areas. B. Screening – Meets Requirements Screening for fences, walls, landscaping, and berms including materials with construction details shall match or complement the construction of the principle building. The Site Plan submitted by the Applicant depicts significant landscaping along Gateway Boulevard which will assist in screening the loading area and docks from the view of the public. The Applicant is stating that landscaping will achieve 60 percent opacity year round at maturity. According to the submitted plans all ground and rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened. C. Planting Islands – Meets Requirements Planting islands are required to visually break up expanses of hard-surface parking areas, to provide safe and efficient traffic movement, and to define rows of parking. Planting islands should occupy at least 10 percent of the parking area and be edged with concrete curbs. Parking lot planting islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet in area, be of appropriate width and length, and include at least one (1) tree meeting the requirements of this ordinance. There will not be multiple rows or large expanses of parking as there will be multiple landscaped bump outs breaking up the parking field. The landscaping will separate the building from the parking areas. D. Minimum Caliper Inches – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires that a minimum number of caliper inches be provided based on the gross square footage of the principal building and the building height. The minimum total caliper inches equal the gross square footage of all the floors of the principal building divided by 320. The proposed building would be considered a four-story structure, and contains 191,796 gross square feet. This requires a minimum of 558 caliper inches be planted. The plans provided by the Applicant indicate that they are meeting this requirement with 564 caliper inches. E. Tree Mitigation - Flexibility requested City Code Section 1325.055 outlines the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Applicant submitted a Tree Preservation Plan that included a tree survey of the existing trees on site. The existing site has 3,837 caliper inches of significant trees. The Applicant is proposing to remove 3,127 caliper inches. The ordinance allows removal of 312.7 caliper inches without replacement. Removal of the remaining 2,814.3 caliper inches of trees requires mitigation at a ratio of 1:2 replacement, or ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 11 of 17 1,407.15 caliper inches of new trees. Tree planning onsite is limited due to existing and required stormwater ponding. In response the applicant is proposing to plant 187 trees, with a total of 558 caliper inches. G. Tree Selection – Meets Requirements The proposed landscape plan includes a variety of tree species, including maples, oaks and evergreens, ranging in size from two and half (2.5) to six (6) caliper inches. This is consistent with ordinance requirements. The Applicant is proposing to plant six (6) to twelve (12) foot tall evergreens. F. Landscaped Area and Perennials and Shrubberies – Meets Requirements Zoning Code requires 35 percent of the site to be landscaped or 97,574 square feet. The landscaping plan shows that the total landscaped area provided on the site is 143,858 square feet. The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 10 percent of the total landscaped area to be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The total landscaped area on the site is 97,574 square feet, resulting in the need for a minimum of 9,757 square feet of perennial and shrubbery cover. The proposed perennial and shrub planting beds includes more than 17,350 square feet. G. Parking - Flexibly Requested Parking requirements for senior living facilities are unique as not all tenants’ own vehicles. The intention is to regulate senior independent, staff and visitor parking. The rational for this is because memory care and assisted living residents generally do not have vehicles; therefore, the parking demand for those uses will only need to support staff and visitor parking. In addition, senior living facilities require a mixture of parking requirement for the different uses onsite. The proposed use includes Multi-family Dwelling and Residential Facility or Group Home. The number of off-street parking spaces required for a Residential Facility or Group Home is one (1) space for every four (4) residents plus one (1) for each employee on major shift plus one (1) for each on-call medical professional or 45 parking stalls. The minimum number of parking spaces required for a multiple family dwelling use in City Code is 1.1 spaces per efficiency and one (1) bedroom dwelling units and two (2) for each two (2) plus bedroom dwelling units. The proposed project would require 145.5 stalls as shown in the table below. Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency Residential Facility NA 45 95 -107 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls) 75 81 2 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls) 38 76 Total 113 202 There are ninety-one (91) parking spaces provided. The Applicant is proposing 62 above ground and 29 underground parking spaces. The underground parking is for independent living residents and staff. New Perspective Senior Living provided staff with the formulas they use when determining the parking needs for their facilities (Attachment G) and below is their calculations for the proposed project. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 12 of 17 Resident Parking x Independent Living typically requires .85 stalls per unit (.85 Stalls / Unit * 53 Units = 45 stalls) x Assisted Living typically requires - .25 stalls per unit (.25 Stalls / Unit * 60 Units = 15 stalls) x Memory Care requires no parking for residents x Total Resident Parking Required: 60 Staff Parking x Staff parking is calculated by taking the largest shift, which is approximately 26 employees, and 50 percent of our next shift or 16 employees. x Total Staff Parking Required: 34 Visitor Parking x One (1) stall per 10 units within the facility (140 Units / 10 Units Per stall = 14) x Total visitor Parking Required: 14 New Perspective Senior Living Parking Stalls Required: 108 Proposed Total Parking Stalls: 95 Parking Deficiency: -13 The Applicant in response to the parking deficiency onsite has contacted Bethel University and discussed a cross easement parking agreement for an additional 25 stalls. At the time of writing this memo the Applicant and Bethel University have not finalized this agreement. The proposed 95 parking and the cross easement stalls should adequately support the proposed use. H. Aesthetics - Meets Requirements There are additional Design Standards for new development, redevelopment, and modifications to existing sites in the B2 District. The purpose of these additional design standards is to promote a high level of architectural, landscaping, and site design in the business districts of Arden Hills. The City seeks to create a unified, harmonious, and high-quality environment to foster a distinct, positive, and successful image for the City. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials shall be of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone (or synthetic equivalent), decorative concrete plank (cement board siding), transparent glass or any combination thereof. The proposed building materials exceed the B2 material requirement. The proposed building is 100 percent brick, stone, glass and cement board siding. Elevation Stone Brick Cement Board Glass Total East 12% 13% 51% 24% 100% West 4% 11% 61% 24% 100% South/North Wing 5% 13% 57% 25% 100% South 5% 0% 73% 22% 100% North/South Wing 5% 17% 65% 23% 100% North .5% 7.5% 67% 25% 100% ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 13 of 17 I. Drainage and Flood Plain - Meets Requirements The City Code requires stormwater management be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration, and water quality requirements. The subject site has two existing wetlands. The existing wetland located adjacent to Minnesota State Highway 51/Snelling Avenue North (Attachment H) is proposed to be filled, however, replacement of that wetland has been mitigated offsite in compliance with Rice Creek Watershed District regulations. The pre-existing stormwater pond located on the east side of the subject site will be preserved. The Applicant is proposing a retention basin located on the southwest side of the subject property. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long- term care of all onsite stormwater facilities. J. Traffic Study - Meets Requirements A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. The anticipated trip generation during AM peak is 27 vehicles in and out of the site. The PM peak is 36 vehicles in and out of the site. The site is anticipated to create 424 daily trips. Suggested Findings of Fact Staff offers the following findings of fact for consideration: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system running through the site. 4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi-family senior living facility on site. 5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. 6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking stall count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree mitigation. 7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City Code in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, planting islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree selection, lighting, screening and aesthetics. 8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 14 of 17 11. Existing public facilities will be able to absorb the additional demand for public services needed for the proposed use. 12. The maximum dwelling unit density per net area that is allowed within the B-2 District is 20 units per acre. 13. The Applicant is requesting a Zoning ordinance amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If approved, the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20- 022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 15 of 17 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County and, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 16 of 17 Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive based on the following findings of fact: the Planning Commission should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive for the following reasons: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets Page 17 of 17 Notice and Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on December 23, 2020. A public neighborhood notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Staff has not received any comments. Neighborhood meeting Prior to submittal of a formal planning application the Applicant held an informal neighborhood meeting on July 9, 2020. Due to Covid19 the meeting was held virtually with ten (10) residents in attendance. The Applicant gave a 30 minute presentation on the project follow by a question and answer session. The majority of the questions raised were in regards to traffic, tree preservation, site and building design, project financing and existing trial connections. The Applicant has incorporated the comments from the meeting into their application for the project. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 23, 2020. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by February 21, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the Petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the Applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Application B. Location Map C. Anderson Center Subdivision and Trails Exhibits D. Proposed Pedestrian Access Plan E. 11x17 Plans F. Zoning Code Amendment Redlines G. New Perspective Senior Living Parking Formulas H. Existing Trail and Wetland Exhibit Lot 1 Lot 2 Outlot A - Access Road Existing Trails Park and Open Space Proposed Parcels Lot 1 Lot 2 Outlot A - Access Road Crepeau Nature Preserve ± Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN Statute 466.03 Subd 21. WetlandWetland DRAFTApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANURY 6, 2021 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Nick Gehrig called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic this meeting was held virtually. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Nick Gehrig, Commissioners Marcie Jefferys, Steven Jones, Subbaya Subramanian, Paul Vijums, Kurtis Weber, and Jonathan Wicklund. Absent: Commissioners James Lambeth and Clayton Zimmerman. Also present were: Community Development Manager Mike Mrosla, Associate Planner Joe Hartmann, and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA –JANUARY 6, 2021 Chair Gehrig stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 9, 2020 –Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Vijums moved, seconded by Commissioner Jones, to approve the December 9, 2020, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 20-022; 2 Pine Tree North –Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment Request –Public Hearing Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated Arden Hills RE, LLC (“Applicant”) on behalf of New Perspective Senior Living has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Zoning Code Amendment for Attachment I DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 2 a project located at 2 Pine Tree Drive (“Subject Property”). The Applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) story, 146 unit multi-family senior living facility with underground parking. The housing units will include independent living, assisted living and memory care. The Subject Property is zoned B-2 General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented at its June 22, 2020 meeting the City Council approved Bethel University’s proposal for a Master Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat at 12 Pine Tree Drive (Bethel’s Anderson Center). The approval subdivided the existing property into three (3) lots of record, one (1) lot of record for the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property. The Applicant is proposing to develop Lot 1 as shown on the image below and in attachment C. The Subject Property is 6.4 acres and is currently owned by Bethel University. The Subject Property currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living. New Perspective Senior Living owns and manages 24 senior living communities throughout the Midwest. The proposed facility in Arden Hills will offer independent care, assisted living, and memory care. The project also includes such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dog run, playground for young visitors, lawn bowling, salon and spa, bistro/bar and onsite physical therapy and wellness services. This facility will staff 80 employees and the anticipated max shift size is 34. Staff will be onsite 24 hours a day. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system running through the site. 4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi-family senior living facility on site. 5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. 6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking stall count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree mitigation. 7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City Code in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, planting islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree selection, lighting, screening and aesthetics. DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 3 8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 11. Existing public facilities will be able to absorb the additional demand for public services needed for the proposed use. 12. The maximum dwelling unit density per net area that is allowed within the B-2 District is 20 units per acre. 13. The Applicant is requesting a Zoning ordinance amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If approved, the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 4 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21.A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 5 but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County and, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24.The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Gehrig opened the floor to Commissioner comments. DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 6 Commissioner Wicklund asked if it was normal to have a zoning code amendment tied directly to a PUD approval. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was not common. He explained staff was ensuring that all appropriate regulations were in place for this use. He noted memory care units were a trending factor. Commissioner Wicklund questioned if staff and the Council were in favor of putting both items together. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated this was the case. Commissioner Wicklund inquired if the City would be synching City Code to the TCAAP regulations. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this has not been done and would not be done until the City receives active applications for properties within TCAAP. Commissioner Wicklund asked if the size of these senior living units would be a concern to the City Council. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented this was discussed by the Council. He noted all units met City requirements except for the memory care units. Commissioner Weber questioned if the common areas will be accessible or available to other residents on the property. Florent ___________, Project Manager on behalf of Wold Architects, thanked the Commission for their time and consideration. He explained the assisted living and independent living areas have their own common spaces complete with fireplaces, billiards room and dance hall. Commissioner Weber stated he was concerned with the size of the memory care unit. He feared that too many people were being crammed into a small space. Adam Cozine, New Perspective representative, stated his buildings had a large percentage of common space at roughly 40%, especially when compared to the competition. He explained he had some of the largest memory care common area spaces of any operator in the country. He reported his organization was a strong operator when it comes to senior living with memory care units. Todd ______________, New Perspective representative, explained he started this business 22 years ago after having his mother-in-law, Betty, living with him with Alzheimer’s for seven years. He indicated his family couldn’t find a place that would fit her needs. This led him to create a new type of senior living development that would meet the changing needs of seniors. He commented further the types of units offered to seniors within his developments. DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 7 Commissioner Weber inquired if the City had any other memory care units that were smaller than 500 square feet. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported Summit Development was proposing to build 120 memory care units on Parkshore Drive and their units were 400 square feet. Commissioner Weber questioned who owned the private drive. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated Bethel University owns and would maintain the private drive. Commissioner Weber asked if appropriate pedestrian crossings would be put in at some point in the future. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented crossings would be installed at the intersections and after Lot 1 was developed crosswalks would be installed. Commissioner Vijums stated he was not concerned about tree mitigation. He discussed City Code requirements regarding efficiency/studio units. He reported the size of the memory care units were a concern to him, even if there was only 17 of them. He asked if the builders could increase the size of these units to 400 to 450 square feet. He feared for the residents of these units and wondered how much smaller developers would go. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the Summit Development was approved with 400 square foot memory care units. Todd ____________explained the research shows fewer steps and more familiarity is best for dementia and Alzheimer patients. He stated this has led to smaller sized units for memory care patients. He commented further on how the four memory care pods were surrounded by bright and airy open spaces. Commissioner Vijums thanked Mr. ___________ for the additional information on the memory care unit design. He agreed with Commissioner Weber that the density was tight for the memory care units. He asked if this building had received Fire Marshal approval. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Fire Marshal had reviewed the building and provided comments to staff and the development team. He noted there were no overall concerns to the request. He reported the Fire Marshal would take a closer look at the plans when the developers requested a building permit. Commissioner Subramanian thanked staff for the detailed report. He asked how much security the memory care units had to ensure the residents did not wander away. He discussed how the recent pandemic has impacted the elderly population. He questioned if this building had restrictions or plans in place to address this concern. Todd ___________addressed the pod system that would be in place within the memory care wing. He reported a resident would have to push on a panic bar for 15 continuous seconds in DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 8 order to get through a door. He noted if someone pushes on an emergency bar, an alarm is sounded and a health aid or caregiver would be notified. Florent ___________ further described the electronic technology that would be in place within the building to assist in keeping the residents safe and secure. Commissioner Subramanian questioned how the current pandemic impacted the design of this building. Florent __________discussed how operations had adjusted to combat and address the COVID- 19 concerns. He thanked all of the healthcare workers for working through the pandemic. He commented further on how the physical plant of the building had changed in order to provide proper screens, spacing and barriers to protect loved ones. He noted the HVAC units also had HEPA filters installed for improved air quality. Commissioner Jones stated he was very familiar with HVAC units within senior living facilities. He explained he was very pleased with these plans after reviewing them in detail. He appreciated the pod system within the memory care wing for security purposes. He indicated memory care units are not supposed to have kitchenettes for safety purposes. He stated he fully supported the proposed high quality development. Commissioner Jefferys asked if memory care units required licensure from the State and had to be a minimum size. Mr. _____________explained he would be receiving an assisted living license. Gary Fisher, architect for the project, explained the State had building code minimums. He reported the proposed project met building code requirements. Commissioner Jefferys stated it did not make sense to exclude the memory care units from the calculation of the development. she encouraged staff to find a better way to calculate the unit size for memory care units. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated he has seen memory care units count as a .33 unit. He explained he had calculated the memory care units as a .5 unit. He commented further on how units were calculated within nursing homes. He described how the Met Council classified memory care and assisted living units. Todd ___________reported assisted living developments were licensed within every state and certain criteria had to be met. Commissioner Jefferys questioned how residents would pay for their units and asked what the price point would be for these units. Todd ___________stated residents would pay for their units on a monthly basis. He reiterated that his business was for profit and described how he works with tenants to keep rent covered through Medicaid. He explained he could provide the Commission with a range of rents for the DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 9 units. He noted all residents do have to prove they can pay rent for two years prior to receiving a unit. Chair Gehrig commented on the parking variance and requested further information on the parking requested. Todd ____________explained the 95 parking stalls being requested would be sufficient. He stated the only time additional parking may be needed was for holidays. Chair Gehrig stated he was pleased to see the building would have 14 visitor parking stalls. Alex __________ discussed the 25 additional parking spaces that was being discussed with Bethel University for overflow parking. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented on the cross access agreement that would have to be reached between the developer and Bethel University. Chair Gehrig opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. Chair Gehrig invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being additional comments Chair Gehrig closed the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. Commissioner Weber requested clarification on the difference between memory care units versus nursing home units. Mr. Cozine discussed the type of positions he would be hiring for the memory care and assisted living units. Todd __________explained his philosophy was to hire and do his own extensive training for his staff members. He noted he would have RNs, LPNs, CNAs and triage nurses on staff. Alex ___________discussed the conversations he has had with Bethel University to create internships and training opportunities for nursing students. Commissioner Weber encouraged the developer to keep the trail safe and open to the public. Commissioner Wicklund moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the thirty-three (33) conditions in the January 6, 2021, report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. DRAFTARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –January 6, 2021 10 REPORTS A. Report from the City Council Councilmember Holmes provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. She noted she would be serving as the Planning Commission liaison for 2021. She thanked Chair Gehrig for his dedicated service to the Planning Commission and thanked Commissioner Vijums for being willing to step up and serve as the Chair. She explained the Council held a Truth in Taxation Hearing on December 14, 2020 where the 2021 budget and tax levy was approved. She indicated the Council has waived the liquor license fees for on-sale license holders for the first half of the year. She noted the Council discussed the B-2 design standards and the Lexington Station Phase 3 development at a recent worksession. She noted residents could drop off broken or unused strands of holiday lights at City Hall through January 29, 2021. Lastly, she reported ice rinks opened on January 2, 2021. B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests None. C. Staff Comments Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was Chair Gehrig’s last meeting. He explained Commissioner Paul Vijums would be serve as the Planning Commission Chair beginning in February. In addition, he noted this was Associate Planner Joe Hartmann’s last meeting with the City of Arden Hills. He wished him all the best in his future endeavors. Commissioner Subramanian thanked Chair Gehrig for his time with the Planning Commission and for leading this group well. ADJOURN Commissioner Jones moved, seconded by Commissioner Subramanian, to adjourn the January 6, 2021, Planning Commission Meeting at 8:26 p.m. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). Approved: September 14, 2020 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 20, 2020 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:00 p.m. Note: On March 20th, the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021 Present via Telephone: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom, Finance Director Gayle Bauman, Community Development Manager/City Planner Mike Mrosla, Deputy City Clerk Jolene Trauba, Recreation Programmer Joe Vaughan Also Present via Telephone: Todd Novaczyk and Adam Cozine from New Perspectives Senior Living, Florent Ilazi and Alex Brewer from Boldt Development, Fay Simer, Melissa Barnes and Mike Barnes from MnDOT, Ryan Spencer from WSB Councilmember Holden requested a discussion regarding sound walls be added to the agenda. 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. New Perspective Senior Living Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated that Bolt Capital LLC on behalf of New Perspectives Senior Living is proposing to construct a multi-family senior living facility on Lot 1 of the recently sub-divided lot at 12 Pine Tree Drive adjacent to Bethel University’s Anderson Center. The lot is approximately 6.4 acres, zoned B-2, General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. The Applicant is proposing to build a 177,500 square foot, four story facility geared toward senior living. The Attachment J ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 2 proposed senior living facility will feature 143 units, with 110 units devoted to independent or assisted care living and 33 units devoted to memory care. The project would include such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dance hall, salon and spa, bistro/bar and onsite physical therapy and wellness services. The applicant is also proposing to make a public trail connection along the proposed access drive and other amenities on site. They are proposing a density of 22.3 units per acre. However, they are requesting flexibility to the memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to central, shared kitchen, dining and living areas - to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. Counting the memory care units as half units would bring the density to 12.7 units per acre. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Applicant is requesting flexibility to the height of the building. The proposed facility would have a building height of 55 feet to the midpoint of the roof, which exceeds the B-2 district ordinance by 5 feet. He noted other development projects that have also exceeded that height. The proposal will require a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for multiple family dwelling in the B-2 District, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for new developments and assisted living use in the B-2 District. At this time the applicant is only asking for flexibility on building height and density. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla said the “Guiding Plan for the B-2 District” was approved by Council in March, 2008. It was a visioning and planning process for the B - 2 District, which generally includes the properties near County Road E between Lexington Avenue and Hamline Avenue/Highway 51. The plan took into consideration market-initiated redevelopment. The plan also discusses the need for senior housing in community. At that time there was a projected need for approximately 712 units within the area. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla noted items the Council may wish to discuss after the presentation include amending the B2 zoning district language to consider memory care/assisted living units as half units, minimum lot area per unit, building height flexibility and other items as determined by Council. Mr. Ilazi gave an overview of the Boldt Company. They do primarily healthcare construction and developments across the Midwest. They are completing two projects in Wisconsin that are very similar to the one being proposed in Arden Hills. Mr. Novaczyk said he founded Perspectives Senior Living in 1998 after his mother-in-law, Betty, died. They currently have 24 communities with 2800 residents and 1800 team members serving the residents. The proposed facility will be in collaboration with Bethel University so they will have internships and practicums with nursing and marketing students. They feel they will have a large impact on the community and Bethel University, along with synergy and collaboration between students and residents. Mr. Ilazi noted they are proposing approximately 143 units, 33 memory care and 110 independent/assisted living units. The community will be approximately 177,550 square feet with 35 underground parking stalls and 75 onsite stalls. There will be many onsite amenities. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 3 Mr. Brewer said there are approximately 450 units of unmet demand for senior housing in Arden Hills. The relationship with Bethel University is very important to the community. The tax revenue generated will be about $400,000 per year, approximately $15,000,000 in labor costs will be generated during construction and 80 FTEs on staff. Mr. Ilazi noted they are committed to replacing the existing trail with a new one that will connect Bethel University and the Crepeau Nature Preserve. A tree survey underway that will be accompanied by a tree preservation plan. They will maintain as many trees as possible and replant where necessary. They will limit the use of concrete and other surfaces as much as possible. Mr. Ilazi said they are looking for flexibility on building height. They’d like to be at 55 feet, the Anderson Center is 60 feet. They’d also like to request flexibility on PUD Density at 22.3 units per acre, but if the memory care units are considered half units that will get them to the required lot area. Mr. Ilazi discussed the preliminary plat map, site plan, renderings, elevations maps, and floor plans. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla added that a neighborhood meeting was held on July 9, 2020. There were 10 residents in attendance. Questions raised were regarding project financing, potential traffic study (they are in the middle of one now), tree preservation, future trail connections, lighting and the construction process. Mayor Grant asked for comments and questions regarding building height. Councilmember Holden asked why they couldn’t make it the required 50 feet? Mr. Ilazi responded that they try to maintain a comfortable floor to ceiling height, along with being able to get the number of units they’d like to have on the site. Mr. Novaczyk noted that hallways are a minimum of nine feet with larger windows, and a peaked roof. Mr. Ilazi said a peaked roof makes it feel less commercial and more like a residential setting. Mr. Cozine added that in order to have the density they are looking for they need the building to be four stories. Mayor Grant said he was OK with the additional five feet. He liked the looks of a peaked roof versus a flat roof that looks commercial. Councilmember Holmes agreed, especially since the Anderson Center is 60 feet. Councilmember Scott didn’t have a problem with the height, he liked the attractiveness of a peaked roof. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 4 Councilmember Holden asked how tall the whole building would be. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla said as this was a concept plan didn’t show official elevations he couldn’t answer that question now. Mr. Ilazi said it would be right around 60 feet, but he would confirm with the architect. Councilmember McClung stated he was mixed on the height and would be more comfortable at three stories versus four but he would want to see some gains in other areas. Mayor Grant asked to talk about the lot area per unit. Councilmember Scott said he had no problem with reclassifying the memory care units as half units. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained that staff recommends allowing that change to the B-2 District only. Councilmember McClung said he wouldn’t like to set a precedence for the entire city and as long as they were careful about the wording he was leaning toward supporting it. Councilmember Holden felt this was a huge footprint and they should be able to have the 128 units as required by the regulations. Mayor Grant commented there are economies of scale, his sense is they want to put a substantial amount of amenities on site to serve the residents but the city needs to provide flexibility on the number of units. He didn’t have a problem with 143 units given the amenities that would be provided. Councilmember Holmes agreed with having a PUD to have the higher number of units. Mr. Novazcyk noted they are offering units for people to stay in their own community to live out the balance of their lives. They will have full time physical therapists for warm water therapy as an example of their amenities. Roughly 46% of the building will be common spaces. Mayor Grant said they should talk about it being a PUD and if they grant flexibility they may want to talk about the trail providing a loop back to the park. Councilmember McClung suggested they loop around the back of the building on the north side to create more walking for their residents and to connect with Crepeau Park. Mr. Ilazi said they will look at the different options they have on the site. Councilmember Holden suggested they add recreational equipment and benches along the trail. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 5 Mr. Novazcyk mentioned that in some facilities they have play areas for grandchildren, and outdoor patios with fireplaces. Councilmember Scott said there was a significant old tree on site that he would like noted and preserved if possible. He thought the discussion occurred on a social site and he would try to find out where the tree is. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla mentioned this proposal will require a public hearing at both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Also, they are intending to meet or exceed the architectural standards. Mayor Grant noted they would like to know the slope of the roof but generally 4 of 5 councilmembers are OK with 55 feet, 4 of 5 are OK with the number of units. Mr. Cozine said the architect responded that the peak of the roof will be 60 feet. Councilmember McClung clarified that the number of units would be OK with other additions to the PUD such as a trail. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla said the next steps would be for the applicant to make a land use application with the City and submit plans for review, and make application with the water shed district for stormwater review. B. MnDOT Access Study for Snelling Avenue (Highway 51) Closure Update Ms. Simer noted that Council had asked for further opportunities for public input about the closure of Hamline Avenue at Snelling. They hosted an open house in May and collected comments before and after. Ms. Simer explained that MnDOT had closed the left turn from southbound Snelling Avenue to Hamline Avenue temporarily in 2019 as part of the mitigation strategy for the 1-35W MnPASS project, anticipating more traffic on Snelling Avenue. Signal timing was adjusted for left hand turns and U-turns at Lydia Avenue. The Cable Median Barrier Project was planned independently of the I-35W project as part of a state-wide initiative to prevent run off road crashes. Cable barriers are planned for Snelling Avenue. Ms. Simer continued that there were 5 crashed at the intersection of Snelling and Hamline from 2016-2018, one of which was a fatality. By closing the left turn lane, they anticipate traffic will reroute to intersections with traffic signals. Prior to the closure, vehicles were observed queuing beyond the left turn lane and into the through lane which creates a crash risk. Prior to the closure only about 8% of cars that turned left onto Hamline were headed to residences in adjacent neighborhoods. Analysis was done to see how the change was affecting Lydia Avenue. Travel time spiked initially, but trended down. Turning left at Lydia takes approximately five minutes longer than turning on Hamline Avenue. Emergency responders in the area were contacted to understand what impact they saw from the closure. They did not feel it would cause delays because they use routing software to respond to calls. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 6 Ms. Simer explained other safety improvements that are being proposed at Lydia, Glenhill Road, County Road C and County Road C2. These improvements will include restricting east bound left turns from Glenhill Road to northbound Snelling Avenue. Ms. Simer stated that implementation of the cable median barrier project is planned for 2022. The design is still being finalized and some modifications may be considered, such as a break in the median to allow bicycles and pedestrians to cross. In addition, a resurfacing project is being planned for the same area. Ms. Simer explained there were public comments regarding the Snelling and Hamline Avenue intersection, Lydia Avenue, Glenhill Road, cable median barriers, and Snelling Avenue. Councilmember Holden was concerned that where it isn’t safe for vehicles to cross two lanes of traffic why would it be safe for bikers and people to walk across Snelling? Ms. Simer said that according to legal definitions, that is a legal crossing because it is an intersection. Councilmember Holden replied that if the cable barrier is there it is no longer an intersection so why would they leave an opening for people to walk across four lanes of traffic? Ms. Simer responded that someone on bike or foot would be much more impacted by having to go to Lydia than someone in a vehicle. Councilmember Holden said one of the reasons they were concerned about this intersection was because of the fatality. She wondered if no work was done since 2017 and the fatality was a big concern why they hadn’t done anything until now. Ms. Simer said it’s hard to draw the line between being reactive and proactive. Typically crashes come into play in their planning to determine what is causing them. They do look at other factors such as residential areas and what destinations vehicles ultimately end at. Councilmember Holden asked why its safe for Glenhill to cross 2 lanes of traffic? Ms. Simer replied that they are looking at balancing safety and mobility. The Glenhill neighborhood doesn’t have as many options in and out of it and there aren’t as many cars using that intersection. Councilmember Holden said she was concerned about Lydia and making a left turn because the sidewalk ends and here is no sidewalk on the other side. She felt if MnDOT were closing the intersection of Hamline it was their responsibility to allow for people to cross safely at Lydia into the Ingerson neighborhood. Ms. Simer responded that MnDot is beginning to identify what they may be able to include in their 2025 project and one of the things would be making it safer to cross, but sidewalks would be up to the City of Roseville. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 7 Mayor Grant asked how many left hand turns are taken from southbound Snelling onto Hamline. Ms. Barnes stated that in April, 2018 there were approximately 1,760 people that took a left over the course of the day. The highest number per hour was 245. Mayor Grant said he had not seen traffic back up from the left turn lane onto Snelling. He wondered if they had evidence of that happening. Ms. Simer said they do not have photos. Mayor Grant commented that if they are proposing a cable median barrier he didn’t know how they could allow pedestrians and bicyclists to cross something that is no longer an intersection. He felt it would no longer be a legal intersection with a cable median barrier in place. And if they make a pedestrian crossing they would have to stripe it. Ms. Simer responded that Minnesota statute defines a pedestrian crossing as the intersection of two roadways so whether they add a marked cross walk is an additional choice that MnDOT can make. Councilmember McClung asked what were MnDOT’s next steps. Ms. Simer said this summer they will move into the design phase of the median barrier project. The decisions of allowing turns or leaving it open to bicycles and pedestrians have not been made yet. Councilmember Holmes asked for explanation of what would happen at Glenhill Road. Ms. Simer replied that vehicles going northbound on Snelling could turn left onto Glenhill but from Glenhill they could only turn right (southbound). Councilmember Holmes was concerned about traveling south on Hamline and make a U-turn at Lydia, especially because Lydia is such an odd intersection to begin with. Ms. Simer said Lydia is a signalized intersection and would be phased to make the U-turns safer, also there is less traffic on the west side of Snelling. Mayor Grant noted that going northbound on Snelling making a left going into Glenhill would still be an option and so that will be a legal place to for pedestrians and bicycles to cross. Ms. Simer replied that movement would still be possible. Also, the regional bike trail network identifies Hamline and Old Snelling as part of the planned network and so that movement is more to be expected at Hamline than Glenhill. Mayor Grant felt that if the cable median barrier closes the intersections drivers won’t be looking for pedestrians and bicyclists. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 8 Mayor Grant said he is not in favor of closing the intersection of Hamline and Snelling. Ms. Simer said when they have decided on the plan it will be put on their website and communicated to the Public Works Director. She anticipated that would be in the next couple of months. Ms. Barnes said they could follow up with the concerns and they can write up an official response. Mayor Grant stated that in 2018 or 2019 on Snelling and approximately E2 a pedestrian was hit and killed and pedestrians do use the road. Councilmember McClung asked for clarification on how Council will be notified of the decision and when it will go public. Ms. Simer said she would inform the Public Works Director and he can send an email to Council. Mayor Grant would appreciate the information before it becomes public. C. 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Finance Director Bauman said this is a continuation of the discussion from the June 15, 2020 work session. The projects included in the first year plan will flow through to the 2021 budget. Public Works is looking for guidance on the 2022 street projects so they can plan for them. Information for streets, parks and public safety have been scheduled out for 10 years to have a better understanding of cash flow. Finance Director Bauman wanted to touch on an update made to the plan and follow up on previous discussion items. The value of city streets at the top of page 2 of the 06/15/20 memo was incorrect. The calculation had been made using 57 miles of streets but the City is responsible for 29 miles. The value of the city streets and trails is closer to $60 million, not the $112 million noted in that memo. There is still a funding gap for the PIR Fund of approximately $400,000 per year. Second, there was much discussion regarding the separation of the Snelling Avenue road project (County Road E to Highway 51) and the round-a-bout. Staff has contacted Ramsey County about this and they did not object to the two projects being constructed under separate contracts. If a round-a-bout were to be completed in 2022, the City will have cash flow issues because it’s estimated that $470,000 of state aid will be needed for funding and the City will not be eligible for reimbursement until 2025 or later because of the advance taken in 2020. It’s anticipated that Ramsey County will have similar cash problems due to COVID-19. Next, there were some questions about 2020 capital activity and cash flow. 2020 information was added to the cash flow statements for the PIR, Equipment/Building Replacement and Public Safety Funds, and an updated project schedule was included based on direction from the March 9 council meeting. Finally, one project was added to the Equipment/Building Replacement Fund, the replacement of the City Hall roof which was added as a placeholder in 2025 in the amount of $150,000. Councilmember Holmes asked if the round-about-was going to be in 2022. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 9 Finance Director Bauman replied that this version of the CIP plan had the round-a-bout pushed back to 2026. Councilmember Holmes said she didn’t think there had been a decision about whether it would be built at all. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said last fall there was a feasibility study, and the City and the County did a study of the intersection in 2018 and that study concluded that a roundabout was recommended as an improvement. As part of completing the feasibility study for the intersection the Council would need to decide if they agreed with the recommendation or if there was another alternative they wish to pursue. Councilmember Holmes said there was in assumption that Bethel College population on their main campus would increase, but that is changing. She felt the study may be inaccurate. She said she wondered if they should do a round-a-bout in an environment where money is tight and there isn’t unanimity on having one. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom agreed that conditions have changed from what the assumptions are in the report and that could potentially change the recommendation. He thought it would be a good idea to look at the study again to verify that the recommendations hold true. Councilmember Holmes indicated the CIP says there is going to be a roundabout, not when. She felt there needs to be more consideration of whether or not it will happen. Councilmember Holden agreed. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said the County had not requested it be pushed to 2026, it was a change staff offered for consideration to try to balance the cash flow in the PIR Fund. What was discussed with Ramsey County was if they had concerns about separating the roadway project of south of County Road E between County Road E and Highway 51 from the roundabout. The County indicated they had no objections to separating the projects. He wanted to get feedback from Council before he presented moving the date to the County. Councilmember McClung asked when can they refocus on the issue to decide how they want to move forward. Councilmember Holden wondered if the County decides to do the roundabout does the City have any way to stop it. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated there would need to be a cooperative agreement between the County and the City for the project to move forward. Councilmember Scott wondered if the Lexington Avenue project was still on track. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 10 Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said there are some concerns due to the reduction in state aid funding. The County relies on a certain portion of that funding for operations, so the County is trying to decide how to maintain enough funds for operations and also have enough funds for capital projects. So there is no final answer at this time. Mayor Grant suggested an hour be set aside before a regular Council meeting to discuss the roundabout project. Councilmember Holden said she would like data from Bethel on the number of students. Councilmember Holmes asked what year the City’s share of the land for the fire station was scheduled. Finance Director Bauman explained the Public Safety Capital Fund shows it in 2020, under fire station line item. The General Fund had an excess balance in 2019 so the money would be transferred to 2020. She was seeking Council direction. Finance Director Bauman discussed 2021 projects, beginning with City Hall Maintenance. City Administrator Perrault said the roof is estimated to be replaced in approximately 3-5 years, so a place holder was added. Finance Director Bauman said the City Hall parking lot is scheduled to be completed in 2021, engineering work is being done this year. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated they could hold the parking lot together by patching if they wanted to push it out another year. Councilmember Holmes suggested it be moved out another year. Councilmember Holden agreed. Councilmember Scott agreed. He felt the roof to be more important than the parking lot. Mayor Grant said given City Hall is currently closed to the public they push it out. Finance Director Bauman discussed the reconstruction of the Arden Manor play area. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented that a grant for the project could be applied for again. The application period runs January through March. It is Federal CDBG money. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said the equipment is usable but as it continues to age replacement parts will be harder to find. Councilmember Holmes suggested moving it out one more year to see if they get the grant. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 11 Mayor Grant asked how much it costs to rent a temporary warming house for Hazelnut Park. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom responded it was $5700 for the winter season, including the electrical connection. Finance Director Bauman said the City is eligible for an insurance settlement of $34,500 so the net cost to the City for a new warming house would be the difference between the $90,000 cost and the $34,500. Councilmember Holmes said maybe we should just rent a warming house. Councilmember Holden felt it should be moved out a year and hopefully Corrections could come build a warming house next summer. The City’s share of the Lake Johanna Fire Department capital budget, the 2021 PMP for the Hazelnut neighborhood street and utility improvements, the City’s share of the Lexington Avenue design work, sewer lining of the Arden View Drive neighborhood were left on the project list. Councilmember Holden asked the Public Works Director to discuss the rehabilitation of lift station 3. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said lift stations are rehabilitated about every 10 years to replace pumps, check the valves and mechanical equipment. The City also upgrades the cabinets and control panels as technology increases. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said here is a 16 inch diameter water main that extends from the south tower booster station to the north tower. In his opinion it is the most critical piece of infrastructure and has been in place for almost 50 years. The Trunk Water Main Evaluation is to determine the extent of corrosion and replacement schedule. Finance Director Bauman stated the last item on the projects list Karth Lake Runoff control which is drainage improvements to the south end of the lake. Fifty percent of the project will be covered with grant funds. Regarding the previous item, the water fund has sufficient funds to do an evaluation of the trunk water main. Mayor Grant said the water main condition assessment is important and asked how the City could expedite the study prior to the submittal deadline for the State bonding bill. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said staff can negotiate a proposal with a consulting firms to prepare the study and identify potential projects for the State bonding bill. He would have time to get the proposal in if he was allowed to get a direct bid versus an RFP. Mayor Grant said staff should move forward using the existing engineering service pool. Councilmember Scott moved the meeting be extended 30 minutes. Council voted approved. Finance Director Bauman noted there are five items listed on the 2021 Equipment list. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 12 Mayor Grant asked if regarding the 2020 General Fund balance the Council would like to take the overage and apply it to the purchase of the fire station property. Council agreed. Finance Director Bauman said the plan includes an increase to the tax levy to the Public Safety Fund in anticipation of the new fire station. Should staff move forward with that assumption and go forward with the 2021 budget? Council agreed. Finance Director Bauman said she would like to know what equipment purchases they’d be comfortable putting into the 2021 CIP. Each of them would still have to come forward to the Council for final approval. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said they should have information regarding the planning and maintenance of equipment by the end of the week. A weighted average PCI for the City would be done by end of the week as well. Mayor Grant asked to see that information before they make decisions on equipment. They would come back to the CIP at a future meeting. D. Environmental Investigation for Snelling North Avenue Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said the City initiated a feasibility study for the project in late 2019. During the geotechnical investigation process for the feasibility study, the soil boring company reported “Apparent Hydrocarbon Odors” at 11 of the 15 soil boring locations. The City hired WSB to conduct an environmental investigation to assist with identification of potential contaminants within the project. He is asking if the Council wants to proceed with a Response Action Plan and a Construction Contingency Plan. Staff is also seeking direction if the City Council wishes to continue considering construction of a new trail to the south of County Road E. Mr. Blomstrom described the three project alternatives for Snelling Avenue North as outlined in the agenda memo. Mr. Spenser said WSB completed environmental due diligence on an approximately .8 mile stretch of Old Snelling Avenue. As part of that a Phase I Environmental Assessment was completed to research the history to try to find what was causing the petroleum odors from the borings. There were two environmental conditions (REC’s), one was the notation of the petroleum odor, the other was contaminated soils that were noted during a bridge replacement in 2018 that required correction due to elevated volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and diesel range organics (DRO). The soils had to be exported to a landfill. Results of Phase I recommended Phase II, which involved collecting data of soil, groundwater and soil vapor. That was completed in April 2020. Fourteen borings were taken. They found a few areas with elevated contamination in the soil that if disturbed would require special handling of material. WSB is recommending a Response Action Plan be prepared in preparation for any future improvements of the roadway. That document will guide the contractor ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 13 on how to manage, screen, or reuse the soil. They recommend the City enroll the project into the MPCA’s Brownfield Program for eligible technical assistance and/or liability assurances related to the PAH and DRO contamination present at the Project Corridor. A requirement of the program would be to have an environmental professional onsite to oversee, screen, and document all excavation and disturbances near known or suspected areas of contamination during reconstruction. The road has been built up over the years and it’s assumed the road base was fill that came from many unknown sources over time. Another scenario was that diesel or fuel oil was sprayed on the road when it was gravel to reduce dust. Oftentimes coating that used to be used on asphalt led to a problem. Mayor Grant asked about control of contaminants, or paving over the areas. Mr. Spenser said the plan they are recommending be prepared would document the materials that can be reused under impervious pavement. Soils at three of the locations that were contaminated would not be able to be reused as road base. Councilmember Holden asked if they did only reclamation but not reconstruction, would reclamation disturb the soil, and how much it would cost to make a plan. Mr. Spenser said reclamation would not get below the road base so impact would be minimized. A utility replacement would have much more disturbance. The Response Action Plan document would cost around $5,000 and the MPCA charges $125 for review. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said they are evaluating the need to replace utilities south of Lindey’s. They are rather firm on the opinion there needs to be utility replacement near the intersection at County Road E, but WSB didn’t identify contamination near this intersection. Mr. Spenser noted that contamination was as shallow as two to four feet below grade and as deep as eight to 10 feet. Councilmember Holden felt they had to do the Response Action Plan. Mr. Spenser said now that they know there is contamination, avoiding excavation is advised. They could do directional boring or other plans to not open up a large contamination area. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom mentioned they are evaluating the watermain along the Snelling Avenue Corridor. The challenge comes in if the City adds a trail along the roadway, it would involve much more handling of the contaminated material. Councilmember Scott would like option 3 as outlined in the agenda memo. Councilmember McClung said he was undecided between option 2 or 3. Councilmember Holmes said between 2 or 3. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 14 Councilmember Holden would like to see option 3. Mayor Grant would like option 3. Mayor Grant said they would have a future discussion about the options. He asked if the Response Action Plan could be presented at the next City Council meeting. E. Fall Recreation Discussion Not discussed, moved to a future meeting. F. Sound Wall Discussion Not discussed, moved to a future meeting. G. Council Tracker No discussion. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 8:34p.m. __________________________ ________________________________ Jolene Trauba David Grant Deputy City Clerk Mayor Planning Case # 20-022 – Public Hearing RequiredApplicant: Arden Hills RE, LLCProperty Location: 2 Pine Tree North DriveRequest: Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code AmendmentZoning: B-2 General Business District Land Use: Community Mixed Use Acreage: 6.41 Attachment K 2•June 22, 2020 City Council approved Bethel University’s proposal to subdivided the existing property into three (3) lots. •One (1) lot of record for the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property.Background Proposal and Use•The Applicant is proposing to construct a 4 story, 146 unit multi-family senior living facility with underground parking.•The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living3 Proposal and Use4•Memory care wing is located on the left side of first floor and consistsof 33 units•17–Studio units (371–391 sq. ft.)•8–Conversion units (428–448 sq. ft.)–Conversion unitsinclude a microwave, sink and a refrigerator.•6–Double units (478–656 sq. ft.)•2–Triple units (914–918 sq. ft.). Proposal and Use5xThe independent and assisted living units are located floors one (1) through four (4) of the building. The unit type are as follows:x15 – Studio units (537 – 640 sq. ft.)x47 – (1) bedroom (673 – 790 sq. ft.)x12 – (1) bedroom plus den (861 – 952 sq. ft.)x38 – (2) bedrooms (973 – 1,212 sq. ft.)1stFloor2ndFloor3rdFloor4thFloor Zoning Code Amendment•CMU District is 20 units per acre. •Memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to a shared central dining and living areas - to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units.•City code section 1325.045, Subdivision 1 requires efficiency (studio) units to be a minimum of five hundred and fifty (550) square feet. The Applicant is proposing units that range in size from 371 to 391 square feet. 6Land UsePermittedDensity Per AcreSite AcreageNumber of Proposed UnitsProposed Density Per AcreProposed Memory Care UnitsProposed Memory Care Equivalent UnitsNumber of Equivalent UnitsProposed Density Per Acre146-16.5= 129.5 units129.5 units/6.4 AC = 20.23*CMU 20 6.4 146 23 33 .5 16.5 20 Zoning Code Amendment•The Applicant and staff are proposing the zoning code amendment below •1320.085,Subd. 5 Assisted Living Additional Planned Unit Development Criteria.•In addition to meeting the requirements of Section 1325, multi-family assisted living residential projects may incorporate memory care units meeting the following:•Each unit consist of private bedrooms with bathrooms;•Each units is open to a shared central dining and living areas;•Units may be less than 550 square feet;•Memory care units shall be considered to be equivalent to .5 dwelling units.7 Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review•Lot Area and Dimensions – Meets Requirements•Building and Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements8Maximum Structure Coverage Min. Impervious CoverageFAR Min. Landscape Lot AreaMin. Frontand Rear Yard Building SetbackMin. Side YardMin. Parking and Driveway Front/Side SetbackRequirement45 percent80percent.820 Percent 20’ 10’/20’ 20‘/5’Proposed31 percent53percent.6444 percent130’/109’10’/69’ 32‘/5’ Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review9 Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review•Building Height - Flexibility requested1055’DevelopmentNameMid-PointProposal55ft.SummitDevelopment46ft.JohannaShores Senior Living56ft.EStreet Flats44ft.ArdenFlats Apartments55ft.AndersonCenter60ft.*MaxHeight to Mid-PointB-2 Standard50ft. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review•District Minimum Lot Area per Unit Requirements - Flexibility requested Dwelling unit. A residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one (1) family with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking and eating but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, tents, seasonal cabins, boarding or rooming houses, motor homes or travel trailers.11Zoning DistrictPermittedDensity Per AcreSite AcreageLot Area per Unit Number of Proposed total UnitsProposed Memory Care UnitsTotalNumber of Units Minus Memory CareLot Area Per Unit Minus Memory CareB-2 2,178 6.4 146 1,909 33 113 2,467 Chapter 13, Zoning Code ReviewMulti-family Dwelling Units Additional CUP Criteria – Flexibility requested•According to City Code Section 1320.45, the number of efficiency (studio) units in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total number of apartments. The Applicant is requesting 32 studio units or 22 percent.12 Design Standards Tree Mitigation-Flexibility requested•The existing site has 3,837 caliper inches of significant trees and the Applicant is proposing to remove 3,127 caliper inches. •The ordinance allows removal of 312.7 caliper inches without replacement. The Applicant is proposing to plant 187 trees, with a total replacement of 558 caliper inches. 13 Design Standards 14Landscaping Plan Design Standards Parking -Flexibly Requested•Parking requirements for senior living facilities are unique as not all tenants’ own vehicles memory care and assisted living residents generally do not have vehicles; therefore, the parking demand for those uses will only need to support staff and visitor parking15UnitsUnit CountsRequired StallsNumber of Stalls ProvidedParking Deficiency Residential FacilityNA 4595 -1071-bedroom units(1.1 parking stalls)75 812 or more bedrooms(2 parking stalls)38 76Total113 202New Perspective Senior Living ParkingTotal Resident Parking Required60Total Staff Parking Required34Visitor Parking14TotalParking Stalls Required108Number of Stalls Provided95Parking Deficiency:-13 Design Standards Aesthetics –Meets Requirements16Elevation Stone Brick Cement BoardGlass TotalEast12% 13% 51% 24% 100%West4% 11% 61% 24% 100%South/NorthWing5% 13% 57% 25% 100%South5% 0% 73% 22% 100%North/SouthWing5% 17% 65% 23% 100%North.5% 7.5% 67% 25% 100% Design Standards Traffic Study17 Public Notice•Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on January 15, 2021. •A public neighborhood notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Staff has received one (1) comment. 18 1. Approval:Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-006, approving the Conditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and the submitted materials.2. Denial: Motion to deny Resolution 2021-006, approving theConditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, basedon the following findings of fact:findings to deny should specificallyreference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot bemitigated.3. Table: Motion to table Resolution 2021-006, approving theConditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive forthe following reasons:a specific reason and/or information requestshould be included with a motion to table.19Proposed Motion Language - CUP 1. Approval: Motion to approve and authorization to publish ordinance for Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact and the January 9, 2021 Report to the City Council. 2. Approval with Amendments:Motion and authorization to publish ordinance to approve Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact and the January 9, 2021 Report to the City Council with amendments. 3. Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated.4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning to Chapter 13 for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. 20Proposed Motion Language - Zoning Code Amendment •Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approvalof Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the thirty-three (33) conditions.•Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approvalof Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the report to the Planning Commission.21Proposed Motion Language •Recommend Denial:Motion to recommend denialof Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive based on the following findings of fact: the Planning Commission should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated.•Table: Motion to tablePlanning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive for the following reasons: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. 22Proposed Motion Language City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 11, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-021 2 Pine Tree North - CUP Release Page 1 of 2 NEW BUSINESS – 10A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 25, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 20-021 Applicant: Lake Johanna Fire Department Property Location: 2 Pine Tree North Drive Request: Easement and Conditional Use Permit Release Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following Consider a motion to release an easement and conditional use permit (CUP) from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North. Background The attorney for Lake Johanna Fire Department has requested to clear title. The effect of the releases are to free the new parcel from CUPs and easements that remain applicable only to the parcel Bethel is retaining. The City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 20-021 under Agenda Item 9A. A full evaluation of the proposed easement and conditional use permit release and supporting attachments are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 9A. The remainder of this memo focuses on the requested approvals. Recommendation A public hearing for this planning case was held at the December 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. No comments were received. The Planning Commission recommended approval by a 7- 0 vote of Planning Case 20-021 for the release of Easements and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 11, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-021 2 Pine Tree North - CUP Release Page 2 of 2 Options and Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-021 for the release of Easements and Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North. 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 20-021 for the release of Easements and Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 3. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-021 for the release of Easements and Conditional Use Permit from Lot 2, Block 1 of 2 Pine Tree North: the City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice and Public Comments A public hearing notice was published in the Pioneer Press on January 15, 2021. No comments were received. Budget Impact: NA Attachments: A. Easement and Conditional Use Permit Release 212192v3 (reserved for recording) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RELEASE OF LAND FROM CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND EASEMENTS Dated: ____________, 2020. KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that the real property in Ramsey County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, 2 Pine Tree North is hereby released from the obligations, terms and conditions of the following agreements: 1. That certain easement for public pedestrian and bicycle pathway purposes granted in the Warranty Deed dated May 4, 1978 and recorded June 9, 1978 in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 2005606; 2. That Conditional Use Permit dated July 8, 2013 and recorded July 18, 2013 in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 4412838; 3. That Conditional Use Permit dated January 13, 2014 and recorded February 10, 2014 in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 4443677; and 4. That Conditional Use Permit dated July 27, 2015 and recorded October 20, 2015 in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 4579877. 212192v3 APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota this ____ day of _____________, 2020. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By David Grant, Mayor By Dave Perrault, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ________________, 2020, by David Grant and Dave Perrault, respectively the Mayor and the City Administrator of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\PH Page 1 of 8 NEW BUSINESS – 10B MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 25, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 20-022 Applicant: Arden Hills RE, LLC Property Location: 2 Pine Tree Drive Request: Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following: Adopting motions to approve, table or deny Planning Case 20-022 for Arden Hills RE, LLC proposed development at 2 Pine Tree Drive. Background The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The Subject Property is zoned B-2, General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. The City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 20-022 under Agenda Item 9B. A full evaluation of the proposed redevelopment and supporting attachments are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 9B. The remainder of this memo focuses on the requested approvals, findings of fact and the staff recommended conditions if a motion to approve is made. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 2 of 8 Requested Action 1. Conditional Use Permit A Conditional Use Permit is required for a multiple family dwelling use in the B-2 District. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community in general, including, but not limited to, the following factors and findings: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; The proposed use does not conflict with the business functions of the surrounding uses and will not pose a significant detrimental risk or nuisance to the health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of adjacent lands. New Perspective Senior Living has an existing relationship with Bethel University. The new facility is adjacent to Bethel’s Anderson Center and will provide additional educational opportunities to their students. 3. Drainage; The proposed site plan does not negatively impact drainage on adjacent properties and the submitted stormwater onsite meets the quantity and quality standards. The Applicant is currently going through the Rice Creek Watershed approval process. 4. Population density; The Subject Property is guided as Community Mixed Use (CMU) in the Land Use Plan. The area is designated for a broad range of retail, shopping, services, and office space to meet the needs of the community and surrounding areas. This area may also include high density housing with a potential density of twelve (12) to twenty (20) units per acre. The Applicant is proposing requesting the memory care units - which consist of private bedrooms/bathrooms with an opening to a shared central dining and living areas - to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If we apply the 0.5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 3 of 8 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; The proposed building materials exceed the B2 material requirement as identified in the Design Standards. The ordinance 75 percent of the building exterior be constructed of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone (or synthetic equivalent), decorative concrete plank (cement board siding), transparent glass or any combination thereof. The proposed building is 100% approved materials. Multi-family developments such as the proposed senior living facility are generally used to transition between commercial and residential neighborhoods. This allows residents ease of access to shopping, restaurants, and entertainment on the surrounding commercial land uses. 6. Adjoining land values; The proposed development is not anticipated to negatively impact adjacent property values. 7. Park dedications where applicable; High density residential requires a park dedication of 20 percent of the total land. A cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required at the discretion of the City. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Planning Case 20-022 for New Perspective Senior Living proposed development at 2 Pine Tree Drive is consistent with the purpose and intent with the policies within the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the B-2 Zoning District and Guiding Plan for the B-2 District. Suggested Findings of Fact: The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their January 6, 2021 meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system running through the site. 4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi-family senior living facility on site. 5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 4 of 8 6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking stall count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree mitigation. 7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City Code in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, planting islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree selection, lighting, screening and aesthetics. 8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 11. Existing public facilities will be able to absorb the additional demand for public services needed for the proposed use. 12. The maximum dwelling unit density per net area that is allowed within the B-2 District is 20 units per acre. 13. The Applicant is requesting a Zoning ordinance amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If approved, the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. Options and Motion Language The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their January 6, 2021 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of the Arden Hills RE, LLC application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment by a 7-0 vote. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider. A Conditional Use Permit is required for multiple family dwelling use in the B-2 District. 1. Approval: Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-006, approving the Conditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and the submitted materials. 2. Denial: Motion to deny Resolution 2021-006, approving the Conditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 3. Table: Motion to table Resolution 2021-006, approving the Conditional Use for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 5 of 8 Zoning Code Amendment 1. Approval: Motion to approve and authorization to publish ordinance for Planning Case 20- 022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact and the January 9, 2021 Report to the City Council. 2. Approval with Amendments: Motion and authorization to publish ordinance to approve Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact and the January 9, 2021 Report to the City Council with amendments. 3. Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 based on the findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-022 for a Zoning to Chapter 13 for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20- 022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 6 of 8 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University, the owner of Outlot A, permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University, the owner of Outlot A, permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department, the owner of Lot 2, Block 1, on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 7 of 8 agencies, including but not limited to MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County and MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the report to the Planning Commission. City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for January 25, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\CC Packet\NB Page 8 of 8 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive based on the following findings of fact: the Planning Commission should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive for the following reasons: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 23, 2020. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by February 21, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the Petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the Applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 2021-007 B. Ordinance Redline NO. 2021-001 C. Summary Ordinance NO. 2021-001 1 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NUMBER 2021-006 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ARDEN HILLS RE, LLC WHEREAS, Arden Hills RE, LLC Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (Applicant), has filed an application for a conditional use permit for a multiple family dwelling; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on the application preceded by published and mailed notice; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has forwarded its recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the application complies with all applicable ordinance standards. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council approves the conditional use permit for Arden Hills RE, LLC in accordance with the application on file with the city and subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 2 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 3 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County and, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 4 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2. The City Planner is directed to record the conditional use permit with the County Recorder/Registrar’s office. PASSED and ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk 5 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. APPLICANT CONSENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The undersigned applicant agrees to the conditions set forth in the permit on behalf of Arden Hills RE, LLC pursuant to authorization and approval of its governing board and officials. The undersigned affirms that they have full authority to execute this consent on behalf of the applicant and acknowledge that if for any reason applicant is not bound by the signatures of the undersigned the conditional use permit shall not be valid. Dated ____________________, 2021. Arden Hills RE, LLC BY: _________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________, 2021, by ____________________ on behalf of Arden Hills RE, LLC and pursuant to authority granted by its governing board and officers. _____________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC Page 1 of 2 To view the final document, access adopted Ordinances via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-001 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ZONING CODE, SECTION 1320.085, SUBD. 5, OF THE ARDEN HILLS CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 13, Zoning Code, Section 1320.085, Special Requirements for the B-2 General Business District, Subd. 5, is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: 1320.085 Special Requirements for the B-2 General Business District. Subd. 5. Assisted Living Additional Planned Unit Development Criteria. (revised 7/7/11X/X/XXXX) A. In addition to meeting the requirements of Section 1325, multi-family assisted living residential projects may incorporate memory care units meeting the following: 1. Each unit consists of private bedrooms with bathrooms; 2. Each unit is open to a shared central dining and living areas; 3. Units may be less than 550 square feet; 4. Memory care units shall be considered to be equivalent to .5 dwelling units. A.B. In addition to meeting the requirements of Section 1325, an existing hotel-motel use may be used for assisted living upon approval of a Master Planned Unit Development provided that all of the following requirements are met: 1. A. The building to be used for assisted living meets applicable building and fire codes as determined by the Fire Marshal and Building Official; 2. B. Each room that has occupants on an overnight basis shall have bathroom facilities within the room; 3. C. The capacity of the building shall not be exceeded. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. Page 2 of 2 To view the final document, access adopted Ordinances via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. PASSED and ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Ordinances via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 2021-001 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ZONING CODE, SECTION 1320.085, SUBD. 5, OF THE ARDEN HILLS CITY CODE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on January 25, 2021, Ordinance No. 2021-001 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 2021-001, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the City Council provides that multi-family assisted living residential projects may incorporate memory care units of less than 550 square feet if each unit consists of private bedrooms and bathrooms and are open to shared central dining and living areas and that for other code purposes those memory care units shall be considered to be equivalent to .5 dwelling units. A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City’s regular office hours or on the City’s website. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, this 25th day of January, 2021. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By __________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Published in the Pioneer Press on January 27, 2021