Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-08-21-RAPPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES Public Inquiry Response From January 25, 2021 City Council Meeting –Public Inquiry Format Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF STAFF COMMENTS COVID -19 Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Acknowledgment Of The Application Of Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 For An Exempt Permit To Conduct A Raffle With The Drawing Being April 17, 2021, With No Waiting Period Julie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve 2021 State Of Minnesota Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program Contract David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -006 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids –Hamline Avenue And Shorewood Drive Improvements David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement With SRF Consultants – Mounds View High School Trail Project David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -007 Supporting Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) Grant Application For Lexington Avenue David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Release Of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments And Termination Of Declaration Of Covenant Restrictions At 4200 Round Lake Road Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Planning Case 20 -010 –Master Planned Unit Development Agreement With Scannell Properties LLC Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Appoint Interim Public Works Director Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal From Bolton And Menk For Engineering Services And Designation Of Engineer Of Record Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 To Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -022 –Planned Unit Development And Site Plan –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Steve Scott Regular City Council Agenda February 8, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476891806 This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 3.A. Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 6.G. Documents: 6.H. Documents: 6.I. Documents: 6.J. Documents: 6.K. Documents: 6.L. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 25, 2021 City Council Meeting –Public Inquiry Format Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF STAFF COMMENTS COVID -19 Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Acknowledgment Of The Application Of Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 For An Exempt Permit To Conduct A Raffle With The Drawing Being April 17, 2021, With No Waiting Period Julie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve 2021 State Of Minnesota Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program Contract David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -006 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids –Hamline Avenue And Shorewood Drive Improvements David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement With SRF Consultants – Mounds View High School Trail Project David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -007 Supporting Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) Grant Application For Lexington Avenue David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Release Of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments And Termination Of Declaration Of Covenant Restrictions At 4200 Round Lake Road Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Planning Case 20 -010 –Master Planned Unit Development Agreement With Scannell Properties LLC Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Appoint Interim Public Works Director Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal From Bolton And Menk For Engineering Services And Designation Of Engineer Of Record Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 To Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -022 –Planned Unit Development And Site Plan –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda February 8, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476891806This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents: 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 6.G. Documents: 6.H. Documents: 6.I. Documents: 6.J. Documents: 6.K. Documents: 6.L. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 25, 2021 City Council Meeting –Public Inquiry Format Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Acknowledgment Of The Application Of Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 For An Exempt Permit To Conduct A Raffle With The Drawing Being April 17, 2021, With No Waiting PeriodJulie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve 2021 State Of Minnesota Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program ContractDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -006 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids –Hamline Avenue And Shorewood Drive ImprovementsDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement With SRF Consultants – Mounds View High School Trail Project David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -007 Supporting Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) Grant Application For Lexington Avenue David Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Release Of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments And Termination Of Declaration Of Covenant Restrictions At 4200 Round Lake Road Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Motion To Approve Planning Case 20 -010 –Master Planned Unit Development Agreement With Scannell Properties LLC Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Appoint Interim Public Works Director Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal From Bolton And Menk For Engineering Services And Designation Of Engineer Of Record Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 To Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -022 –Planned Unit Development And Site Plan –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda February 8, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476891806This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 6.G. Documents: 6.H. Documents: 6.I. Documents: 6.J. Documents: 6.K. Documents: 6.L. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 25, 2021 City Council Meeting –Public Inquiry Format Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Acknowledgment Of The Application Of Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 For An Exempt Permit To Conduct A Raffle With The Drawing Being April 17, 2021, With No Waiting PeriodJulie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve 2021 State Of Minnesota Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program ContractDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -006 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids –Hamline Avenue And Shorewood Drive ImprovementsDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Professional Services Agreement With SRF Consultants –Mounds View High School Trail ProjectDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -007 Supporting Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) Grant Application For Lexington AvenueDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Release Of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments And Termination Of Declaration Of Covenant Restrictions At 4200 Round Lake Road Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Approve Planning Case 20 -010 –Master Planned Unit Development Agreement With Scannell Properties LLCMike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Public Works Director/City EngineerDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Appoint Interim Public Works Director Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal From Bolton And Menk For Engineering Services And Designation Of Engineer Of Record Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 To Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning Case 20 -022 –Planned Unit Development And Site Plan –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New Perspectives Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda February 8, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476891806This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:6.G.Documents:6.H.Documents:6.I.Documents: 6.J. Documents: 6.K. Documents: 6.L. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPublic Inquiry Response From January 25, 2021 City Council Meeting –Public Inquiry Format Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Acknowledgment Of The Application Of Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 For An Exempt Permit To Conduct A Raffle With The Drawing Being April 17, 2021, With No Waiting PeriodJulie Hanson, City Clerk MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve 2021 State Of Minnesota Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program ContractDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -006 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids –Hamline Avenue And Shorewood Drive ImprovementsDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Professional Services Agreement With SRF Consultants –Mounds View High School Trail ProjectDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Adopt Resolution 2021 -007 Supporting Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) Grant Application For Lexington AvenueDavid Swearingen, Assistant City Engineer/Engineer in Training (EIT) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Release Of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments And Termination Of Declaration Of Covenant Restrictions At 4200 Round Lake Road Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Approve Planning Case 20 -010 –Master Planned Unit Development Agreement With Scannell Properties LLCMike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Public Works Director/City EngineerDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFMotion To Appoint Interim Public Works DirectorDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Proposal From Bolton And Menk For Engineering Services And Designation Of Engineer Of RecordDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 2 To Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement ProjectDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSNEW BUSINESSUNFINISHED BUSINESSPlanning Case 20 -022 –Planned Unit Development And Site Plan –Arden Hills RE, LLC –2 Pine Tree Drive –New PerspectivesMike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda February 8, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476891806This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.3.A.Documents:4.4.A.Documents:5.6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:6.G.Documents:6.H.Documents:6.I.Documents:6.J.Documents:6.K.Documents:6.L.Documents:7.8.9.10.10.A.Documents: 11. Page 1 of 1 RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Public Inquiry Response from January 25, 2021 City Council meeting Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ At the January 25, 2021, City Council meeting, a resident inquired about the Public Inquiries/Informational portion of the agenda. A verbal response will be provided at the February 8, 2021 City Council meeting. Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 4A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: February 8, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. CONSENT ITEM 6A MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider A. Approve Claims and Payroll or B. Reject Claims and Payroll Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact NA Attachments 2021 Payroll #3 ……………………………………………………………. $136,011.43 Total Payroll $136,011.43 Paid Claims--- 1/16/2021 through 1/29/2021 (Check Nos. 49847-49879 and ACH Checks) ……………………………... $487,054.23 Total Accounts Payable $487,054.23 Total Claims $623,065.66 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 3 CHECKS DATED: 02/05/21 Biweekly: 01/16/21 - 01/29/21 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 7,678.46 EFT SIT 3,545.92 EFT FICA Oasdi 6,090.29 EFT FICA Medicare 1,424.37 EFT TOTAL TAXES 18,739.04 Health Premium 1,288.96 A/P Check* Dental Premium 265.52 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1,554.48 HSA Health Saving 228.33 Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 0.00 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 499.31 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 547.81 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,275.45 PERA 4,660.54 EFT ICMA 2,573.77 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 750.00 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 8,598.71 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 1,225.53 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 132.94 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 35.70 A/P Check* UNUM 19.51 A/P Check* AFLAC 22.76 EFT TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,608.44 Total Employee Deductions 31,776.12 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 69,923.17 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 101,699.29 Plus City Paid Benefit 34,312.14 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 136,011.43 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 101,699.29 Less Total FSA 1,554.48 Less Total H.SA 1,275.45 Less Voluntary Ins 58.46 Less Non Taxable Reimbursement 990.00 Plus ICMA Employer 409.50 Net P/R Subject to FICA 98,230.40 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 6,090.29 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,424.37 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 1,500.00 5,377.55 5,787.05 98.90 98.90 CITY BENEFIT 6,090.29 1,424.37 7,514.66 409.50 18,873.08 538.45 19,411.53 1,500.00 Accounts Payable User: Printed: Pang.Silseth 2/4/2021 9:20 AM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0189 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 01/22/2021ACH 1000187 2021 Annual Fee 16.67 1000187 2021 Annual Fee 16.67 1000187 2021 Annual Fee 16.66 120187 December Locates 37.35 120187 December Locates 37.35 120187 December Locates 37.35 162.05Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0192 GRAINGER INC 01/22/2021ACH 9760841487 Shovels 141.05 9762915040 Band Saw 386.33 9763373710 Saw Blades 49.28 576.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0292 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC 01/22/2021ACH 3482919 December Rental 26.04 26.04Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0320 HEALTH PARTNERS INC 01/22/2021ACH 102261379 February Dental 1,118.41 1,118.41Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 01/22/2021ACH PR 21-02 PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 354.90 PR 21-02 PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 409.50 764.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 01/22/2021ACH PR 21-02 PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 243.15 PR 21-02 PR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.01.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 2,228.54 2,471.69Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0750 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/22/2021ACH 9870999479 Service 1/11-2/10 988.01 988.01Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 0761 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 01/22/2021ACH 70062-IN New Hatches LS3 & 14 4,374.44 4,374.44Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0761: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 01/22/2021ACH 253261 Planning 5/16-6/12 PC20-004 #500 60.00 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 253261 Planning 5/16-6/12 PC20-0003 #499 240.00 253261 Planning 5/16-6/12 PC20-005 #502 240.00 253261 Planning 5/16-6/12 60.00 262902 Planning 11/14-12/11 300.00 900.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1408 SUPPLY SOLUTIONS LLC 01/22/2021ACH 31200 Supplies 111.11 111.11Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1408: 6060 BATTERIES PLUS 01/22/2021ACH P34563893 Batteries 165.50 165.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6060: 7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 01/22/2021ACH 1057394 Restrooms 12/26-1/22 285.00 285.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025: 7506 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF ARDEN HILLS LLC01/22/2021ACH 2020-02 75% TIF 2nd Half 2020 113,338.39 113,338.39Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7506: FPTC FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY INC 01/22/2021ACH 25741 Aries Tractor Repair 2,750.65 2,750.65Total for this ACH Check for Vendor FPTC: JOHC JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 01/22/2021ACH 1-100568347655 2021 Fire & ROC Svc Agree. 2,011.00 1-100568630980 2021 HVAC & FMS Svc Agree 5,110.00 1-100610560419 Furnace Service 1,987.52 9,108.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: NWFS NORTHEAST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES01/22/2021ACH 1182021 2021 Contribution 18,583.59 18,583.59Total for this ACH Check for Vendor NWFS: AMFI AMERICAN FIRE & SAFETY 01/22/202149847 21494 2021 Annual Maintenance-CH 99.20 21495 2021 Annual Maintenance-PW 708.50 807.70Total for Check Number 49847: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 01/22/202149848 383376 Keys 22.35 397614 Shovel & Spreader 81.97 398754 Paint 10.99 399721 Cleaning Supplies 24.98 140.29Total for Check Number 49848: 0719 CITY OF ST PAUL 01/22/202149849 IN44367 Sep-Dec Animal Boarding 305.00 305.00Total for Check Number 49849: Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription CWBL CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 01/22/202149850 12545 2021 GIS Fees 961.89 961.89Total for Check Number 49850: 1033 COMCAST 01/22/202149851 44271.0221 Service 1/21-2/20 6.57 6.57Total for Check Number 49851: 10244 COMCAST BUSINESS INC 01/22/202149852 114773287 January Service 496.66 496.66Total for Check Number 49852: 10405 DALEY ELECTRIC LLC 01/22/202149853 200540 Electrical Perry Park Lights 446.00 200550 Electrical Wire Repair 449.00 200570 Electrical Outlet Service 168.00 1,063.00Total for Check Number 49853: 5711 FROST INC 01/22/202149854 7622 Spray Nozzle 297.70 7634 Spray Equip-Pump 314.85 612.55Total for Check Number 49854: 10218 HR GREEN INC 01/22/202149855 140843 RRA-December 2,179.00 2,179.00Total for Check Number 49855: UB*00457 Allen Johnson 01/22/202149856 Refund Check 001262-000, 4529 Lakeshore Place 28.52 28.52Total for Check Number 49856: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC01/22/202149857 796 2020 Reimb.-White Board 382.88 799 2020 Cap Reimb.-Tablets 5,411.30 5,794.18Total for Check Number 49857: 5138 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/22/202149858 40002726-2021 2021 Property Insurance 105,630.00 105,630.00Total for Check Number 49858: 6022 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 01/22/202149859 10821 2021 Pest. App. Lic. Renewal-Baar 10.00 10.00Total for Check Number 49859: NSCC NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION INC01/22/202149860 2020-528 Q4 2020 Contribution 6,135.90 6,135.90Total for Check Number 49860: 0155 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES 01/22/202149861 W20120592 December Phones 736.14 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 736.14Total for Check Number 49861: 1208 PREMIUM WATERS INC 01/22/202149862 610207-12-20 January Water 27.99 613317-12-20 January Water 26.97 54.96Total for Check Number 49862: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 01/22/202149863 FLEET-0006019 December Fuel 2,969.01 PUBW-018974 Q4 2020 Brine Purchase 131.18 PUBW-018994 2020 Pavement Marking 4,763.27 PUBW-018999 Q4 Salt Purchase 9,062.00 16,925.46Total for Check Number 49863: 6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 01/22/202149864 GL154938.0221 February Insurance 1,661.71 1,661.71Total for Check Number 49864: UB*00456 Dick Schifsky 01/22/202149865 Refund Check 002469-000, 1636 Lake Johanna Boulevard 11.62 11.62Total for Check Number 49865: 5497 SCHWAAB INC 01/22/202149866 5637162 Stamp Pads 37.00 37.00Total for Check Number 49866: 10369 SORENSEN CONSULTING 01/22/202149867 AH:2:20 PW Dir Assessmt 375.00 375.00Total for Check Number 49867: UB*00455 Kent Stennes 01/22/202149868 Refund Check 000892-000, 1469 Dawn Circle 24.52 24.52Total for Check Number 49868: 3099 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC-LITTLE CANADA01/22/202149869 A82488 Supplies 32.41 32.41Total for Check Number 49869: 9755 VERIZON CONNECT 01/22/202149870 OSV000002322367 December Service 307.61 307.61Total for Check Number 49870: 300,062.15Total for 1/22/2021: 0192 GRAINGER INC 01/29/2021ACH 9773294963 Tools 143.74 143.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0327 STAPLES INC 01/29/2021ACH 3466909834 Supplies 101.70 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 101.70Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0706 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 01/29/2021ACH 7226280 Gloves 251.22 251.22Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0706: 0922 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION01/29/2021ACH 2020-255 Production Services-December 657.25 657.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 01/29/2021ACH M1198 Jan. Planning Comm. Minutes 225.00 M1198 Jan. City Council Minutes 209.00 434.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 01/29/2021ACH 263184 2021 PMP 28,550.00 28,550.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1252 CAMPBELL KNUTSON - ATTORNEYS AT LAW01/29/2021ACH 3231G-1220 December Legal Services 263.50 3231G-1220 December Legal Services 466.00 3231G-1220 December Legal Services 31.00 3231G-1220 December Legal-Karth Lake Runoff 356.80 3231G-1220 December Legal Services 318.60 3231G-1220 December Legal, PC 20-010 #506 300.00 1,735.90Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1252: 1330 MN CLN SERVICES INC 01/29/2021ACH 0121NN01 Janitorial Services-December 2,005.58 1120NN12 Janitorial Services-November 1,780.08 3,785.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1330: 1785 ECOENVELOPES LLC 01/29/2021ACH 1889 Jan UB Processing 396.55 1889 Jan UB Processing 396.55 1889 Jan UB Processing 396.56 1,189.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1785: 5587 CES IMAGING INC 01/29/2021ACH INV123209 January Rental 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: AFFI AFFINITY PLUS FED CREDIT UNION 01/29/202149871 1212021 Letter of Credit 250.00 250.00Total for Check Number 49871: 10200 BADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC 01/29/202149872 1000906 Inspection Escrow #390 7,268.00 7,268.00Total for Check Number 49872: AR-CALI CALIBER LODGING LLC 01/29/202149873 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription TCO2018-00496 Escrow Refund: TCO 2018-00496, 3920 Northwood Dr 10,000.00 10,000.00Total for Check Number 49873: 10455 METRO EROSION 01/29/202149874 2019-00365 Hydrant Meter Refund 883.11 883.11Total for Check Number 49874: 0422 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY01/29/202149875 10000112429 PBP Reimb. Old Snelling & CR E 187.50 10000112516 VIC Reimb. Old Snelling & CR E 625.00 812.50Total for Check Number 49875: 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 01/29/202149876 315800022021 February Insurance 64.00 64.00Total for Check Number 49876: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 01/29/202149877 FLEET-000615 Equip Parts & Services-December 5,265.00 FLEET-000615 Equip Parts & Services-December 2,651.00 PRRRV-001534 Q1 2021 Election Svcs 6,975.00 SHRFL-001944 January Law Enforcement Svcs 115,686.34 130,577.34Total for Check Number 49877: 1054 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 01/29/202149878 B12879467 Docking Station 205.00 205.00Total for Check Number 49878: 3099 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC-LITTLE CANADA01/29/202149879 A83017 Hardware Supplies 23.00 23.00Total for Check Number 49879: 186,992.08Total for 1/29/2021: Report Total (59 checks): 487,054.23 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (2/4/2021 9:20 AM) Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 6B MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Acknowledgment for Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Ch. 239 to Hold Raffle Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ Council Should Consider A motion to approve the following: • Acknowledgment of the LG220 Application from Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 for a raffle to be held on April 17, 2021 with no waiting period All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion The City has received a request from Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 for authorization to hold a raffle to raise money for the national Ducks Unlimited charitable organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and enhance North America’s wetland and associated upland habitat. According to Minnesota’s Lawful Gambling regulations, they are required to obtain acknowledgment from the City. This does not require a permit or license from the City as it is not a premise permit. As part of the requirement of LG220 Application for Exempt Permit, the City must formally acknowledge the application with no waiting period, with a 30 day waiting period, or deny the application. Staff recommends the City Council approve a motion acknowledging this Application for an Exempt Permit to conduct a raffle with a drawing date of April 17, 2021, with no waiting period. Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A: LG220 permit application Attachment B: Non-profit letter rr MINNESOTA I.AWFUL GAMBUNG LLltT Page 1 of 2LG22O Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that:. conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and. dwords less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. Application Fee (non-refundable) Applications are processed in the order received. If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $1OO; otherwise the fee is $15O. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite seruice, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION I N FOR]IIATION Organization Previous Gambling Name:Ducks Unlimited North Suburban Chapter 239 Permit Number:x-03315-20-014 Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number (FEIN), if anyNumber, if any: Mailing Address: : 36-3766069 1320 Amble Rd. City : Arden Hills State: MN Zip: 55112 County ; Ramsey Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO):Peter Belsito CEO Daytime Pho ns;651-242-3889 cEo Emait: peter.g.belsito@gmail.com (permit will be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): t] Fratemat E Relisious t_] veterans Other Nonprofit Organization{ Attach a copy of one of the following slrowing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) A current calendar year Ceftificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 65L-296-2803, or toll free t-877-55L-6767 IRS income tax cxemption (sof(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at L-877-829-5500. IRS - Afflliate of nationa!, statewide, or internaUonal parent nonprollt organizaUon (chafter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. { GA]TI BLI NG PREITIISES I N FOR]IIATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted Welsch's Big Ten Supper Club(for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Physical Address (do not use P.O, box):4703 N Hwv 10. Arden Hills. MN 55112 Check one: City : Arden Hills zip: 55112 County: County: Ramsev n Township:zip Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing):7 1o zt Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo t] Paddlewheels E Putl-rabs Tipboards Raffie Gambllng aqulpmcnt for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels. pulFtabs, and tipboards must be obtalned from a diskibutor lic€nsed by the Mlnnesota Gambling Control Board, EXCEmON: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball sel€ction devlces may b€ borrowed from another organization audrorized to conduct blngo, To find a licensed distributor, go b wwv.fin.goylgcb and click on Dritdbrrtro,l' under the Lrsl of U6n3.rr tab, or call 651-539-1900. { { LG22O Application for Exempt Permit LUtt Page 2 of 2 LOGAL UilrT OF GOVERilfEilT ACKIIOWLEDGIIENT (rcqulrcd beforc submltting.ppllc.tion b thc ilanncaota Gambltng Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a lst class city). The app lication is denied .lh'dPrint City Name: Signature of City Personnel Title Date The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPR,OVAL for a gambling premises located in a township application is acknowledged with no waiting period application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title Date TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title:Date CHIEF EXECUTM OFEICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this ap is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned Board 30 of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature :Date '.-D^- 77,2"? I Signature must be CEO's sig re; designee may not sign) Print Name: REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for:. all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or. all gambling conducted on one day. Only one application is required if one or more raffie drawings are conducted on the same day. Financial repoft to be completed within 3O days after the gambling actlvity is done: A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for 3-L/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). t{ail application with: a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and application fee (non-refundable). If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is llOO; otherwise the fee is 115O. Make check payable to State of lrlinnesota. To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, wlth the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board membe6, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An egual opportunlty emdoyer Page 1 of 2 DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen (EIT), Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of 2021 ICWC Contract Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $14,250 $14,250 General Fund (Street/Park), Surface Water Utility Fund Council Should Consider The City Council is requested to consider approval of the proposed 2021 contract with the Minnesota Department of Corrections Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) program. Background/Discussion In May 2019, the City entered into a one-year contract with the Minnesota Department of Corrections to participate in the Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) program. The program provided a work crew consisting of a crew leader and up to ten crewmembers for up to ten hours per day to complete predetermined work plans. Work dates were available on Friday, Saturday and Sunday at a cost of $75 per hour. In 2019, ICWC crews completed buckthorn removal in Floral, Cummings and Hazelnut parks, sediment removal and rain garden maintenance in Valentine Park, and performed landscape maintenance at City Hall, Highway 96 median areas and the gateway sign on New Brighton Road. In 2020, ICWC crews only worked one day due to COVID-19 restrictions. The ICWC has provided a new contract for the 2021 season as provided in Attachment A. The terms of this proposed contract are similar to the 2019 and 2020 contracts, but the hourly rate has increased from $75 to $85 per hour for crew time. A preliminary 2021 ICWC work plan is provided as Attachment B. This work plan can be modified during the 2021 contract term based on City Council priorities and availability of ICWC work crews. CONSENT ITEM – 6C MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact The 2021 Operating Budget contains the following funding amounts for services by ICWC: General Fund Street Maintenance $ 5,000 General Fund Park Maintenance $ 5,000 Surface Water Utility Fund $ 4,250 Total $14,250 Attachments Attachment A: 2021 ICWC Contract Document Attachment B: Preliminary 2021 ICWC Work Plan Rev. 12/2020 Page 1 of 3 State of Minnesota Income Contract SWIFT Contract No.: This contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Corrections, Institution Community Work Crew, 1450 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (“State”), and the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN 55112 (“Purchaser"). State and Purchaser may be referred to jointly as “Parties.” Recitals 1. Under Minn. Stat. §241.278 the State is empowered to enter into income contracts. 2. The Purchaser is in need of an Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC). 3. The State represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to provide the services described in this contract. Accordingly, the Parties agree as follows: Contract Term of Contract 1.1 Effective date: May 1, 2021, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. 1.2 Expiration date: April 30, 2022, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. State’s Duties The State will: 2.1 Provide crew leader(s) who will supervise up to ten (10) offender crewmembers per ten (10) hour days of work on dates mutually agreed between parties, including the hour’s crew leaders spend for daily preparation and communication. 2.2 In coordination with the Purchaser, train each work crew in safety principles and techniques set forth by the Purchaser and applicable federal, state and local agency requirements. Purchaser agrees that the State has the responsibility and authority to refuse selected projects if it considers the projects beyond the skill level of the crewmembers and/or unsafe to perform. 2.3 Provide required personal safety equipment and clothing needed for specific work. 2.4 Screen projects to ensure that appropriate staff are assigned. Purchaser’s Duties The Purchaser will 3.1 Obtain all necessary permits or licenses or special authority for all projects that utilize ICWC labor. 3.2 Assign all work and coordinate material purchases and delivery through the ICWC crew leader for projects to be performed by the State. 3.3 Hire any subcontractors utilized in the project. 3.4 Provide utilities at the work site and set up accounts for the purchase of materials and rental of specialized tools or equipment needed for the work. 3.5 Meet with the State as necessary to provide project information needed by the State in the performance of its’ duties. 187795 Rev. 12/2020 Page 2 of 3 Payment The Purchaser will pay the State for all services performed by the State under this contract as follows: The Purchaser agrees to pay Eighty-Five dollars and 00/100 ($85.00) for each overtime hour worked by the ICWC crew, as its share of the cost of providing a crew leader and placing the work crew into service on the ICWC program during the term of this agreement. Payment will be made no later than the 23rd day following the last day of the billing period. Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Scott Miller, ICWC Supervisor or his successor, 1450 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 The Purchaser’s Authorized Representative is Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director/City Eng or his successor, and the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN 55112. If the Purchaser’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Contract, the Purchaser must immediately notify the State. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete. Assignment. The Purchaser may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Contract without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed assignment agreement, executed and approved by the authorized parties or their successors. Amendments. Any amendment to this Contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the authorized parties or their successors. Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this Contract, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. Contract Complete. This Contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Purchaser. No other understanding regarding this Contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. Liability Each party will be responsible for its own acts and behavior and the results thereof. Government Data Practices. The Purchaser and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, (or, if the State contracting party is part of the Judicial Branch, with the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court as the same may be amended from time to time) as it applies to all data provided by the State under this Contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Purchaser under this Contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data governed by the Minnesota Government Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, by either the Purchaser or the State. If the Purchaser receives a request to release the data referred to in this clause, the Purchaser must immediately notify and consult with the State’s Authorized Representative as to how the Purchaser should respond to the request. The Purchaser’s response to the request shall comply with applicable law. Publicity and Endorsement. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this Contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State’s Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, information posted on corporate or other websites, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Purchaser individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this Contract. Endorsement. The Purchaser must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. Rev. 12/2020 Page 3 of 3 State Audits. Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Purchaser’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Contract are subject to examination by the State, the State Auditor, or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the expiration or termination of this Contract. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Termination. Either party may cancel this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. 1. Purchaser Print Name: ________________________________ Signature: _________________________________ Title: Date: ___________ 2. State Agency With delegated authority Print Name: ________________________________ Signature: _________________________________ Title: Date: ___________ 3. Commissioner of Administration As delegated to The Office of State Procurement Print Name: ________________________________ Signature: __________________________________ Title: Date: ___________ Admin ID: __________________________________ Work Item Decription Estimated ICWC Crew Hours April Highway 96 Median Lanscaping Remove ground landscape and prepare planting beds 20 May Highway 96 Median Lanscaping Place new plantings and mulch in planting beds 20 Perry Park Dog Park Facility Improvements Remove block walls, benches and decommissioned items 10 June Chatham Open Space Restoration Remove Buckthorn and Invasive Vegetation 20 July Chatham Open Space Restoration Remove Buckthorn and Invasive Vegetation 10 Trail Edging Clear trail edges in preparation for 2021 fog sealing 10 Siems Court Restore Rip Rap along drainage swale 10 Hazelnut Park Phase 3 Remove Buckthorn and Invasive Vegetation 10 August Hazelnut Warming House Structure Construction 50 Channel Repairs at 1531 McClung Dr Stream Bank Erosion Repair - Granding and Rip Rap 10 Crepeau Nature Preserve Buckthorn, landscape and trail maintenance 10 Highway 96 Landscape Weed and maintain landscape areas 10 September Floral Park Vegetation Management Remove Buckthorn and Invasive Vegetation 10 October Winterize Landscaping - City Hall/Hwy 96 City Hall and Highway 96 Median, Entrance Monument 10 Preliminary 2021 Work Plan Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Draft: February 2021 City of Arden Hills Page 1 of 2 DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen (EIT), Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Plans & Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $210,000 (2021 CIP) $235,000 (Pre-bid Estimate) PIR, Ramsey County and Surface Water Management Council Should Consider The City C ouncil is requested to consider adoption of Resolution 2021-006 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvement Project. Background/Discussion The 2021 – 2025 Capital Improvement Program identifies pedestrian crosswalk improvements along Hamline Avenue and drainage improvements along Shorewood Drive, with both projects scheduled for construction in the year 2021. The City Council authorized preparation of construction plans in February 2020 and had subsequent discussions regarding the project in September 2020 and December 2020. The proposed project includes installation of raised center medians along Hamline Avenue at Wyncrest Court and south of Indian Oaks Circle to provide safety improvements for pedestrians crossing a roadway with an average traffic volume of 10,000 vehicles per day and a posted speed limit of 40 mph. The project also includes drainage improvements along Shorewood Drive to address a local flooding issue that has persisted for several years. The project plans and specifications are prepared and the project is ready for solicitation of construction bids. Adoption of Resolution 2021-006 will approve the plans and specification and order bid advertisement for the Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements project. Bids would be received on March 17, 2021, and presented to the City Council on March 22, CONSENT ITEM – 6D MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 2021, with an appropriate resolution to award the construction contract. This schedule will allow for construction starting in May 2021 and a final construction completion date is October 29, 2021. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-006 as provided in Attachment A. A copy of the project plan set is provided in Attachment B. The specification and project manual consist of 311 pages. A full copy of project manual is on file and available upon request to the City Clerk or by downloading from the project webpage prior to the start of bidding. Budget Impact A summary of the estimated project costs and funding sources is provided below, and includes funding from a cooperative agreement with Ramsey County for the proposed pedestrian crosswalk improvements. Total Estimated Costs Hamline Avenue Crosswalks $ 102,000 Shorewood Drive Drainage $ 88,000 Design Services $ 35,000 Construction Administration $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 235,000 Total Estimated Funding PIR Fund $ 66,000 Ramsey County $ 60,000 Surface Water Mgmt Fund $ 109,000 TOTAL $ 235,000 The amounts listed above are estimates based on the current opinion of probable construction costs. Final total expenses and funding amounts will be revised and presented to the City Council upon receipt of construction bids. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2021-006 Attachment B: Project Plans 1 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-006 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has prepared plans and specifications for Improvement Project No. PW-20-0103, Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvement Project, for installation of pedestrian crosswalk improvements along Hamline Avenue and construction of drainage improvements along Shorewood Drive. The plans and specifications have been presented to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisements shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be received by the clerk until 10:00 a.m. on March 17, 2021, at which time they will be publicly opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on March 22, 2021, in the council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during the consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the city for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021. ________________________________ Mayor Attest: ______________________________ City Clerk STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1 1 3 (P) OF ARDEN HILLS STREET FUND B 50% SAP 062-650-014 / 50% CITY A STORMWATER UTILITY FUND FUNDING SOURCE NOTES: DENOTES PLAN QUANTITY ITEM LBS/ACRE WITH APPLICATION RATE 150 5 FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 17-10-7 LBS/ACRE WITH APPLICATION RATE 350 4 FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 22-5-10 3 INCLUDES PEDESTAL FOOTINGS 2 INCLUDES GARAGE APRON SHALL BE INCIDENTAL AS PER SPEC 2357 AND 1 TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED NOTES:File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:est01\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_est01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF MJM BAJ 41 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/19/2021 1/19/2021JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH PW-20-0103 MJM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE 2020 PAVEMENT SAP 062-650-014 1 1 4 TABULATIONS 3 PAVEMENT REMOVAL FOR MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION. MIXTURE AT A DENSITY OF 113 LBS/SY-IN. PAVEMENT. USE SPWEB340B BITUMINOUS ASSUMED TO BE 6" THICK BITUMINOUS 2 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT THICKNESS CURB RAMPS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. UNDER ALL NEW SIDEWALK, PEDESTRIAN 1 PLACE 3" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 NOTES:File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:Default\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_tb01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF MJM BAJ 41 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/19/2021 1/19/2021JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH PW-20-0103 MJM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE 2020 PAVEMENT SAP 062-650-014 BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE THE MINIMUM. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY 1 1 CONTROLS, AND RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL LAND, AND PROPERTY CORNERS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ADMINISTRATION, SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLATES, APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY STANDARD PLATES DESCRIPTIONPLATE NO. SURVEYS AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: TEMPORARY TURF ESTABLISHMENT EXISTING TOPSOIL AND SLOPE DRESSING PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT 7100H CONSTRUCTION NOTES & STANDARD PLATES 2101, 2105, 2573, 2575, AND AS AMENDED BY THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING EROSION IS SET FORTH IN MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS 1717, 1803, RESPONSIBILITIES TO CONDUCT HIS CONSTRUCTION IN A MANNER THAT WILL CONTROL EROSION. ALONG WITH PAY ITEMS FOR THEIR USE. THIS DOES NOT, HOWEVER, RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND THEIR SUGGESTED LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE PLANS BITUMINOUS AND AGGREGATE TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO MOWING EQUIPMENT (INCIDENTAL). SLOPE DRESSING PLACEMENT AND/OR AFTER LOOSENING THE SOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING OR BOTH. THIS IS INTENDED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL STICKS AND ROCKS EXCEEDING 2" IN ANY DIMENSION AT THE TIME OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION SLOPES. THE EXISTING TOPSOIL FROM ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION FOR PLACEMENT AS SLOPE DRESSING ON OF NATURAL (INPLACE) SOIL. THIS MATERIAL MUST BE USABLE AS 6" SLOPE DRESSING. STRIP AND STOCKPILE ANY REFERENCE TO TOPSOIL IN THE PLAN OR SPECIAL PROVISIONS WILL PERTAIN TO THE UPPER 6" (AVERAGE) 7038A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TRUNCATED DOMES 7113A CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE DETAIL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (DESIGN B & V) CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RESTORED AS INDICATED ABOVE, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT THE ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS THAT WERE NOT NECESSARY FOR THE (FINAL STABILIZATION) MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. UTILITIES 5 3000M REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (6 SHEETS) CONSTRUCTION STAKING MAINTAIN SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF STREET AT ALL TIMES FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. ROUTE. TPAR IS DEFINED AS THE TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE AND IS PAID AS ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN DISPOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2104.(INCIDENTAL) THE ENGINEER. HARDENED CONCRETE WASTE MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT LIMITS AND PROPERLY CONCRETE TRUCKS THAT WASH OUT WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS MUST DO SO AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY MUST BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2104. ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR SALVAGE OR FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH MAY BE SEE MN/DOT'S SPECIFICATION 2106. EXISTING AGGREGATE AND TOPSOIL SHOULD BE SALVAGED AND REUSED IN NEW CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL (COMMON EMBANKMENT) ON THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS AND BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE RIGHT OF WAY. NO DIRECT COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE THEREFORE. MATERIALS NOT TO BE USED IN THE PAVEMENT EMBANKMENTS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104 & 2106. MATERIALS SUCH AS PEAT, MARL, MULCH AND OTHER UNSTABLE BE REMOVED FROM THE EMBANKMENT FOUNDATION. THE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN BACKFILL OR EMBANKMENT. MATERIALS DEFINED AS UNSUITABLE (TOPSOIL, ORGANIC MATERIAL, DEBRIS) MUST THE DEFINED CATEGORIES IN SPEC 2106. THESE SOILS ARE THEREFORE NOT REUSABLE AS STRUCTURAL UNSUITABLE SOILS ARE DEFINED AS SOILS WHICH DO NOT MEET OR ARE NOT MANUFACTURED TO MEET ANY OF SPECIFICATION 2106. MATERIAL IS DESIGNATED SUITABLE WITH RESPECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT. SEE MN/DOT'S EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHOULD BE USED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, SO FAR AS THE EXCAVATED HAVE BEEN FINISHED TO GRADE IN ANY SIGNIFICANT AREA. PRACTICAL TIME. TOPSOIL COVERING SHALL BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER THE GRADING SOILS OPERATIONS SO FAR AS TO PERMIT COMPLETION OF THE EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AT THE EARLIEST EARTHWORK FINISHING AND TOPSOIL COVERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED CONCURRENTLY WITH GRADING DISPOSED OF OFF THE R/W IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104. ALL MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND PERPETUATE DRAINAGE ON ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION (INCIDENTAL). COMPACTION FOR AGGREGATE BASE MUST BE BY THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD. TACK COAT REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE A UNIFORM TACK COAT AS DOCUMENTED IN THE MOST RECENT SPEC 2357 - BITUMINOUS 8000J CHANNELIZERS - TYPE A, B, C (3 SHEETS) NOTIFY SURVEYOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO STAKING NEEDS. CONTRACTOR. STAKING INCLUDES CURB AND GUTTER AND PEDESTRIAN RAMPS. ALL STAKING WILL BE ONE-TIME STAKING, WRECKED OR RUINED STAKES ARE RE-STAKES AT COST OF THE SHOREWOOD DR DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE CONTRACT BY JULY 4, 2021. CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETE ALL WORK RELATED TO HAMLINE AVE CROSSINGS AND CONSTRUCTION PHASINGFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:Default\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_scn01.dgn1/15/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF MJM BAJ 41 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/19/2021 1/19/2021JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH PW-20-0103 MJM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE 2020 PAVEMENT SAP 062-650-014 6 41Model:250-1 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tblNOTES: TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. S 5 3 7 7 PARALLEL TIERED PERPENDICULAR DIAGONAL BACK OF CURB FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE FLAREFLARE 4 4 PERPENDICULAR WALK WALKA A REQUIRED LANDING 4' 0'' MIN. RAMP VAR. SECTION A-A CURB AND GUTTER CURB OR 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 1/4" R. SECTION C-C 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 1/4" R. PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER REQUIRED LANDING 4' 0'' MIN. C C A A FLARE 3 4 A A FLARE 4 S S F S SECTION B-B FAN PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/DIAGONAL 0.083 FT./FT PREFERRED 0.05 FT./FT. AND REQUIRED LANDING 4' 0'' MIN. RAMP VAR.CURB AND GUTTER CURB OR 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 1/4" R. 0.05 FT./FT PREFERRED 0.02 FT./FT. AND S F WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE OR WALK CONCRETE 6" WALK CONCRETE 6" WALK CONCRETE 6" S F 4 APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. OF CURB, WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLY INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15' FROM THE BACK WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE 6 6 6 DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB. RADIAL CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5 7 7 AND RETURNED CURBS, WHEN INITIAL LANDING IS AT FULL CURB HEIGHT. SEE SHEET 4 OF 6, TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS, FOR DETAILS ON FLARES 4 4 FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA. DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF THE 4' X 4' MIN. LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOT CURB AND GUTTER CURB OR MODIFIED FAN 5 6 4 4 7 3 WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE OR CURB HEIGHT 0" 0" 1 MATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F F F F B B FLARE FLAREF F F F F B B FLARE FLAREF S DEPRESSED CORNER C C S 2 2 2 4' MINIMUM DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP. MAY BE USED STRAIGHT FORMS 8 8 8 ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH. X" 0" 0" 0" 3" 3" 0" 3" 0" 0" 3" 0"0" 0"0" 0"0" 1 1 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3' LONG RAMP, 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEP 2 9 EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN SHALL ONLY BE USED AFTER ALLSURFACEOR WALKABLENON-WALKABLEPAVE FULL WALK WIDTH. 9 9 SURFACE OR WALKABLE NON-WALKABLE 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX SLOPES TO REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4' WIDE OR LESS, THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP 6SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. (EXCEPT AS STATED IN BELOW. ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. THUS BOTH LENGTH OF RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FEET. THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/TRAIL WIDTH. ARC WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF SHARED-USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF SHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. DETECTABLE 4' MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS LEGEND IS CONSTRAINED USED WHEN RIGHT-OF-WAY A 7' MIN TOP RADIUS GRADE BREAK REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTIBLE. AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2%. DIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%, LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) CHANGES FAN THAT THE GRADE BREAK IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. (TYPICAL FOR ALL) THE GRADE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF WALK. THIS WILL ENSURE OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS SHOULD BE USED IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO GRASS, GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. V CURB, 8%-10% FLARE 8%-10% FLARE MAX. 2% MAX. 2% 10 EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. "S" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN 10 10 THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISIONS - PROSECUTION OF WORK (ADA). SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, LANDINGS OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 1 OF 6STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(CSAH 50)CITY PROJ. NO. PW-19-0106 APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 417 6" CONCRETE WALK AGGREGATE BASE 3" MINIMUM CLASS 5 WITHIN INTERSECTION CORNER TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION 7 NON-WALKABLE SURFACE 1 1 1 3 4 6 7 8 5' MAX 9 COMBINED DIRECTIONAL RAMP ADJACENT BACK OF CURB. TRANSITION, PAVE CONCRETE RAMP WIDTH TO LESS THAN 2' IN WIDTH AT TOP OF CURB IF NON-CONCRETE BLVD. IS CONSTRUCTED AND IS 10 10 11 SECTION D-D GUTTER SLOPE 2.0%-3.0% CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS RAMP WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE OR BACK OF CURB FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE D D 14 7 S 6" CONCRETE WALK VAR. RAMP TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE NOTES: 13 IN ALL DIRECTIONS MAX. 2.0% SLOPE RAMP 13 13 13 13 BREAK GRADE 9 11 IN ALL DIRECTIONS MAX. 2.0% SLOPE BREAK GRADE 1 1 1 PLACE DOMES AT THE BACK OF CURB WHEN ALLOWABLE SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED. 5' MAX BACK OF CURB FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE F F 7.0' PREFERRED MINI MU M 5.5'S 5 SURFACE WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE 2' MAX 4 2.0% MAX 1.0% MIN. 1 SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT WHEN 12 12 2 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3' LONG RAMP 10 10 9 2 2 3 7 7 STANDARD ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL WARNING AT BACK OF CURB ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL WITH DETECTABLE 11 5 RAMP 6 WALKABLE SURFACE, DIRECTIONAL RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE USED. SEE THE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. WHEN USING CONCRETE PAVED FLARES ON THE OUTSIDE OF DIRECTIONAL RAMPS, AND ADJACENT TO A S MATCH FULL CURB HEIGHT. THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1 1 0" 0" 4" PREFERRED (7' MIN. DISTANCE REQUIRED BETWEEN DOMES). 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT (5.5' MIN. DISTANCE REQUIRED BETWEEN DOMES) DIRECTIONAL RAMP WALKABLE FLARE 8% TO 10% SLOPE SLOPES TO REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4' WIDE OR LESS, THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP 8 8 TO BE USED FOR ALL DIRECTIONAL RAMPS, EXCEPT WHERE DOMES ARE PLACED ALONG THE BACK OF CURB.14 SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. V CURB, IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK 8% TO 10% WALKABLE FLARE. 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOP GRADE BREAK OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEP VISUAL ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH. 0" REVISION: RAMPS. IF THIS OCCURS MODIFY THE RAMP LOCATION OR SWITCH RAMP TO A FAN/DEPRESSED CORNER. THE "BUMP" IN BETWEEN THE RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR COMBINED DIRECTIONAL LENGTH OF RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FEET. THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/PATH WIDTH. ARC WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF SHARED-USE PATH AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF SHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. DETECTABLE 4' MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND HELPS ELIMINATE THE CURB TAPER OBSTRUCTING THE PATH OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. WARNINGS SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE WALK/PATH. THIS ENSURES A DETECTABLE EDGE FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS WITH THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLACED AT THE BACK OF CURB, THE DETECTABLE 10 S F CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN CURB HEIGHTX" 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX LEGEND APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. OF CURB, WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLY INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15' FROM THE BACK AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE. DIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%, LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) CHANGES 11SEE NOTES & FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT. RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISION (PROSECUTION OF WORK). SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, LANDINGS CONSTRUCTED INTEGRAL WITH CURB AND GUTTER. MAX. 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS IN FRONT OF GRADE BREAK AND DRAIN TO FLOW LINE. SHALL BE SET 3" FROM BACK OF CURB. IF 9" SETBACK IS EXCEEDED USE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS. RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE SETBACK UP TO 9" FROM THE BACK OF CURB WITH CORNERS MAINTAIN 3" BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF CURB. IMPAIRED. WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO IS VISUALLY BACK OF CURB. A WALKABLE SURFACE IS DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CURB RAMP SURFACE, AND 5' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO NON-WALKABLE SURFACE WITH ONE CORNER SET 3" FROM FRONT EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL BE SET BACK 2' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO WALKABLE OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 2 OF 6STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(CSAH 50)CITY PROJ. NO. PW-19-0106 APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:250-2 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 8 41 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. DIMENSION TO BE SAME AS SIDEWALK THICKNESS, 4" MIN. 6"5"MIN.MILL & PATCH 2" BITUMINOUS 1 2 4 9 5 PAVEMENT EXISTING BIT. PAVEMENT SAWCUT BIT. PAVEMENT EXISTING BIT. PAVEMENT SAWCUT BIT. PAVEMENT EXISTING BIT. 9 CONCRETE PAVEMENT SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT EXISTINGCONCRETE BASE VARIABLE DEPTH EDGE MILL VERTICAL 2" BIT. PATCH NOTES: PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTER FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROADWAY. ELEVATION CHANGE TAKES PLACE FROM THE EXISTING TO NEW FRONT OF GUTTER. NO PONDING SHALL BE PRESENT IN THE PAR. 9" THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL DISCONTINUITIES GREATER THAN 1/4". 45&45& 45& 4 6 BIT. PAVEMENT REMOVE & REPLACE t/2 t FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS 7 8 3 24"MIN. 24"MIN. 24"MIN. ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'S APPROVAL BEGIN GUTTER SLOPE TRANSITION 10' OUTSIDE OF ALL CURB RAMPS. CENTER INTO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1' MINIMUM FROM ALL JOINTS. DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 EPOXY-COATED 18" LONG TIE BARS AT 30" CENTER TO 13 14 12 PLACE BOND BREAKER BETWEEN WALK AND TOP OF SILL. 1PERPENDICULAR 24"8-12" INSET A 4 FLOW LINE 7" 4 EDGE OF WALK BACK OF CURB/ 2-5% 1/4" 4 7 2 FLOW LINE NON PERPENDICULAR 2-3% 24"8-12" 4 6 1/4" 7" PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL FLOW LINE 24"8-12" 4 3% 1/4" (REGARDLESS OF RAMP TYPE) 3FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROUND RADIUS 7" 24" 4 7" 7 4 EDGE OF WALK BACK OF CURB/ 1/4" 5% MAX. OUTFLOW GUTTER INSET B RAMP VAR.INSET B 8 INSET A 4 7 4 7 INSET A INSET A POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) AT A 2% MAXIMUM. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS. FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NON VARIABLE WIDTH FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB APPLICATIONS. SEE SHEET 2 FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB SLOPE REQUIREMENTS. TOP 1.5" OF THE GUTTER FACE MUST BE A FORMED EDGE. PAR GUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID. TOP FRONT OF GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. 10 10 11 1/2" MAX. 1/4" MIN. TO 1/4" 1/4" 1/4"1/4" FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL, AND DIAGONAL RAMPS. FOR USE AT CURB CUTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER 2'-10' TYPICAL SMALL RADIUS 2'-10' TYPICAL SMALL RADIUS 4 EDGE OF WALK BACK OF CURB/ 4 EDGE OF WALK BACK OF CURB/ PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER THIS RADIUS DESIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. HELPS PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE RAMPS, REDUCES THE DOME SETBACK LENGTH AND MINIMIZES DIRECTIONAL CURB. 12 SHOULD BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS WHEN AT A DRAINAGE HIGH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMENTS. 13 14DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC11 (DOWNSTREAM SIDE) 1:3 MIN. TAPER PAST OUTSIDE ZERO HOLD TANGENT 5' PAST OUTSIDE ZERO HOLD TANGENT 5' ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP OUT)SIDE STREETTO NOT AFFECT PARKING 20' MAX. RECOMMENDED DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC MAIN STREET20' MAX. RECOMMENDED TO NOT AFFECT PARKING(UPSTREAM SIDE) 1:5 PREFERRED TAPER 1:3 MIN. TAPER PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. ON-STREET PARKING IS AVAILABLE. CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR APS INTERSECTIONS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED. CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE USED IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS, USUALLY IN DOWNTOWN ROADWAY SEGMENTS WHERE IS AT BACK OF CURB OPTIONAL SILL CURB WHEN SIDEWALK SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. CONCRETE SILL TO BE USED ONLY WHEN (COMPOUND RADIUS) COMBINED DIRECTIONAL FLOW LINE PROJECTED 8-12" 6" CONCRETE WALK OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 3 OF 6STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(CSAH 50)CITY PROJ. NO. PW-19-0106 APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:250-3 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 9 41 3 4 LANDING RAMP LANDING RAMP SURFACE NON-WALKABLE CONCRETE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE 0" CURB HEIGHT. 2 1 2 2 FLARE 1 1 2 NOTES: TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS FULL CURB HEIGHT. 6 GRADED FLARES 1' MINIMUM SURFACE WALKABLE CONCRETE FLARE 2 LANDING RAMP CONCRETE 2 1 FLARE 2 SURFACE NON-WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE A A1 1 2 2 SECTION A-A 6"4" VAR. 2' 7" TOP OF GUTTER GUTTER curb & design v curb 5 4 ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE PAVED FLARES ADJACENT TO NON-WALKABLE SURFACE PAVED FLARES CONCRETE FLARE 33 FLARE GRADED 1:6 FLARE GRADED 1:6 1/2" R. 1:61:6 7 7 3 3 8-10%8-10% 8 8 6 6CURB TAPERCURB TAPERBACK OF CURBCURB TAPERCURB TAPER BACK OF CURB CURB HEIGHT MATCH INPLACE CURB HEIGHT MATCH INPLACE SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038 AND THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WARNING. (MEASURED AT FRONT FACE OF CURB) 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT, 4" PREFERRED CURB AND GUTTER DETECTABLE EDGE WITH RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT CURB AND GUTTER MEASURED ALONG THE RAMPS FROM THE BACK OF CURB. CONCRETE FLARE LENGTHS ADJACENT TO NON-WALKABLE SURFACES SHOULD BE LESS THAN 8' LONG 6 7 6 2' FOR 4" HIGH CURB AND 3' FOR 6" HIGH CURB. 9 10 9 LANDING RAMP SURFACE NON-WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE 2 1 CURB DESIGN V CURB DESIGN V 2 6" B B CONCRETE TURF OR CONCRETE TURF OR TOP OF sidewalk SECTION B-B h/2 TYPICALLY USED FOR MEDIANS AND ISLANDS. 6" 2' 3" h 10 11 11 13 12 PLAN VIEW RAILROAD CROSSING 4' 8.5" RAIL NEAREST PEDESTRIAN GATE ARM 2' WARNINGS DETECTABLE 2' WARNINGS DETECTABLE WALK/PATH WIDTH WARNINGS ENTIRE PLACE DETECTABLE 9 12 PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF ROADWAY. MAINTAIN 3" MAX. BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. WHEN NO CONCRETE FLARES ARE PROPOSED, THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED THEREFORE IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. OF A CURB TAPER AND LESS THAN 3 INCHES IN HEIGHT IS NOT CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND UNIFORMLY RISES TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT. ANY CURB NOT PART TAPERS ARE CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE WHEN THE TAPER STARTS WITHIN 3" OF THE EDGE OF THE THIS DETECTABLE EDGE REQUIRES DETECTABLE WARNINGS WHEREVER THERE IS ZERO-INCH HIGH CURB. CURB ALL CONSTRUCTED CURBS MUST HAVE A CONTINUOUS DETECTABLE EDGE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE CURB AND GUTTER. DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER. REINFORCEMENT 13 14 14 14 CROSSING SURFACE SHALL EXTEND 2' MINIMUM PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF WALK OR SHARED-USE PATH. THE EDGE OF BITUMINOUS ROADWAY AND/OR BITUMINOUS SHARED-USE PATH TO PROVIDE VISUAL CONTRAST. IF NO CURB AND GUTTER IS PLACED IN RURAL SECTIONS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE PLACED 1' FROM APPROACHING SIDE OF THE GATE ARM. THIS CRITERIA GOVERNS OVER NOTE . BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE GATES OPPOSITE THE RAIL, 2' FROM THE WHEN PEDESTRIAN GATES ARE PROVIDED, DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL 12 FOR A MIN. 6" LENGTH (MEASURED ALONG FLOW LINE) OF BOTH ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK, ADJACENT PROPERTY CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATING CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS. CONDITIONS DICTATE. THE ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE THE RAMP SIDE TREATMENTS BASED ON MAINTENANCE SIDE TREATMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL RAMP TYPES AND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AS NEEDED AS FIELD 1 1 1 1 15 15 GATE ARM RAILROAD 8.75' 16 4.25'4.5' 16 15 7 7 FACE OF CURB FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED SURFACE CROSSING ROAD EDGE OF ROAD EDGE OF REINFORCEMENT BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE V CURB. DRILL AND GROUT 1 - NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPOXY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER. ENSURES MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND GATE ARM COUNTERWEIGHT SUPPORTS. SIDEWALK TO BE PLACED 8.75' MIN. FROM THE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB. THIS DETAIL APPROACH NOSE SEE PEDESTRIAN DETAIL APPROACH NOSE SEE PEDESTRIAN RETURNED CURB 5 NOSE DETAIL PEDESTRIAN APPROACH SIDE TREATMENT) (FOR RETURNED CURB FLARE WALKABLE SURFACE WALKABLE FLARE WALKABLE BOULEVARD DRAINAGE. FULL HEIGHT CURB REFER TO SHEETS 1 & 2 TO MODIFY THE CURB HEIGHT TAPERS AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE HEIGHT CURB (I.E. 6' LONG RAMP FOR 6" HIGH CURB). WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS MORE THAN 1" BELOW SIDE TREATMENT EXAMPLES SHOWN ARE WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS APPROXIMATELY LEVEL WITH THE FULL MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE NEAREST RAIL. NEAREST RAIL. FOR SKEWED RAILWAYS IN NO INSTANCE SHALL THE DETECTABLE WARNING BE CLOSER THAN 12' NEAREST EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED 12' MINIMUM TO 15' MAXIMUM FROM THE 3' FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITTER ISLANDS. NOSE CAN BE REDUCED TO 2' ON FREE RIGHT ISLANDS. RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO IS VISUALLY IMPAIRED. A WALKABLE SURFACE IS DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CURB RAMP WITHOUT OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 4 OF 6STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(CSAH 50)CITY PROJ. NO. PW-19-0106 APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:250-4 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl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odel:250-5 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 11 41 NOTES: 3 4 1 2 6" 5 POUR REINFORCEMENT SEPARATE LANDING 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. LANDING 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. LANDING CURB LINE AND ROAD CROSSING ADJUSTMENTS REINFORCEMENT CURB AND GUTTER 12" 12" 3" LANDING MAX. 36" MAX. 36" 3" 12" LANDING 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 12" 12" 3" 3" 12" 12" 36" MAX. TO CENTER (EPOXY COATED). BARS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH RAMP GRADE. DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS AT 36" MAXIMUM CENTER AND GUTTER PROPOSED CURB SIDEWALK EXISTING REPLACEMENT SIDEWALK SIDEWALK EXISTING JOINT (INCIDENTAL) FULL DEPTH ON EXISTING SAW CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) 4" SIDEWALK PROFILE VIEW T T/2 AND GUTTER EXISTING CURB CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED PAR 3" MIN. SAWCUT 3" MIN. SAWCUT PLAN VIEW 5 MAX. 36" MIN. 12" T/2 4 LANDING LANDING 4 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 AREA TABLING TYPICAL EDGE OF THROUGH LANE EDGE OF THROUGH LANE EDGE OF THROUGH LANEAREA TABLING ALLOWABLE <EDGE OF THROUGH LANEPEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2' 2' FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - TWIN PERPENDICULARS PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - TWIN PERPENDICULARS PEDESTRIAN RAMP FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - FAN CHANGE UP TO 2.0% CHANGE UP TO 2.0% CHANGE UP TO 2.0% CHANGE UP TO 2.0% CHANGE UP TO 2.0% TO 4% CHANGE 2.0% MAX. OR UP PEDESTRIAN RAMP FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - FAN TO 4% CHANGE 2.0% MAX. OR UP TO 4% CHANGE 2.0% MAX. OR UP 1.5% PREFERRED 1.0% MIN. 1.5% PREFERRED 1.0% MIN. 1.5% PREFERRED 1.0% MIN. 4) LONGITUDINAL THROUGH LANE ROADWAY TAPERS SHOULD BE 1" VERTICAL PER 15' HORIZONTAL 3) 5.0% RECOMMENDED MAX. FLOW LINE 2) 1.0% MIN. FLOW LINE (ON EITHER SIDE OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP) TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE 1) 1.0% MIN. AND 5.0% MAXIMUM CROSS-SLOPE OF THE ROAD ALLOW COMPLIANT RAMPS OR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; RAISING OF CURB LINES SHOULD OCCUR IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS. RAISE THE CURB LINES ENOUGH TO REPLACEMENT ON CONCRETE ROADWAYS. WARPING IS DONE WITH BITUMINOUS PATCHING ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS AND FULL-DEPTH APRON STAND-ALONE ADA RETROFITS: FOLLOW MILL & OVERLAY CRITERIA ABOVE HOWEVER ALL PAVEMENT 4) UP TO 2% CHANGE IN FLOW LINE FROM EXISTING SLOPE BEYOND THE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 3) "TABLE" FLOW LINE UP TO 4% CHANGE FROM EXISTING SLOPE IN FRONT OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2) 5.0% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE OF THE ROAD 1) 1.0% MIN. CROSS-SLOPE OF THE ROAD MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; INTO THE THROUGH LANE. TABLE THE FLOW LINE TO 2% OR ASPAVEMENT CAN NOT EXTEND IS REQUIRED WHEN THE EXISTING FLOW LINE IS GREATER THAN 2%. WARPING OF THE BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY PROJECTS: "TABLING" OF FLOW LINES, IN FRONT OF THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, "TABLING" OF ENTIRE CROSSWALK SHALL OCCUR WHEN FEASIBLE. RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: ON FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECTS IS REQUIRED WHEN A ROADWAY IS IN A STOP OR YIELD CONDITION AND THE PROJECT SCOPE ALLOWS. "TABLING" OF CROSSWALKS MEANS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 2% CROSS SLOPE WITHIN A CROSSWALK, 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT FOR PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT 5 OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 5 BOULEVARD NON-CONCRETE BOULEVARD NON-CONCRETE BOULEVARD CONCRETE BOULEVARD CONCRETE FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. (RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%) SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE 2 2 USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. THIS OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAIL SHOULD ONLY BE OPTIONAL SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT TO BE USED 1/2 IN. PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WITHIN RADIUS. DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 X 12'' LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED). 55 5 55 OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 6 OF 6STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(CSAH 50)CITY PROJ. NO. PW-19-0106 APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:250-6 Pedestrian Curb Ramp1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 12 41 NOTES: VARIABLE SECTION A-A SECTION B-B 6' PREFERRED (6" HIGH CURB) 4' PREFERRED (4" HIGH CURB) 1.5' MINIMUM VARIABLE LEGEND X" BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. 5.0' PAR INDICATES DRIVEWAY RAMP - SLOPE SHALL VARIABLE SECTION C-C 5.0' PAR RESIDENTIAL. SEE GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET 2 FOR MORE INFORMATION. 8% MAX. PREFERRED, 10% MAX. FOR COMMERCIAL AND 12% MAX. FOR 8% MAX. PREFERRED, SEE SHEET 2 FOR MORE INFORMATION. 1:10 PREFERRED FOR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. 1:3 MIN. 1:5 PREFERRED FOR DRIVEWAY RETROFIT PROJECTS. REDUCED TO 4.5' OR 4' MIN AFTER ALL OTHER OPTIONS HAVE BEEN APPLIED. IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS PAR WIDTHS CAN INCREMENTALLY BE WIDEN DRIVEWAY PAR WIDTH TO MATCH APPROACHING SIDEWALK PAR WIDTHS. 5.0' MIN. PAR WIDTH IS THE STANDARD THROUGH DRIVEWAYS. IF FEASIBLE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE, MAY NOT EXCEED 0.02 FT./FT. AS CONSTRUCTED. B B A A A A A A SURFACE NON-WALKABLE SURFACE NON-WALKABLE SURFACE WALKABLE 5.0' PAR 5.0' PAR 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 5.0' MIN. C C 1.5% PAR TIE-IN 5.0' APRON PAR TIE-IN PAR TIE-IN 5.0' 5.0' MIN 0"6"0"6" 0"6"3" 0"0"6"6" 0"0"6"3"3"6" 0"6"3"0"6"3" 1 3 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 44 44 44 5 5 5 66 6 6 6 7 FF FF F F F F 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 4 7 7 10 10 PARALLEL DRIVEWAY TIERED PERPENDICULAR DRIVEWAY PERPENDICULAR DRIVEWAY TIERED PERPENDICULAR OFFSET DRIVEWAY PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR OFFSET & PARALLEL. DRIVEWAY TYPES FROM MOST PREFERRED TO LEAST PREFERRED ARE AS FOLLOWS: VALLEY GUTTER DRIVEWAY CURB HEIGHT (INCHES) AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR). 1/4" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE TOP OF CURB, RESULTING IN A CONTINUOUS PAR PROFILE. TO BE USED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY PAR IS LEVEL WITH OR ABOVE DRIVEWAY TYPE CAN BE USED FOR BOTH PAVED (AS SHOWN) AND GRASS BOULEVARDS. TO BE USED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY PAR IS BELOW THE ROADWAY CURB HEIGHT. THIS 7 F 4 10 0"3"6" SURFACE WALKABLE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL MATCH INPLACE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL MATCH INPLACE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL MATCH INPLACE 8"-12" 8"-12" EFFECT ESPECIALLY WHEN MULTIPLE DRIVEWAYS ARE PRESENT. EFFECT. 4" HIGH ROADWAY CURB SHOULD BE USED TO REDUCE "ROLLER COASTER" SHOULD BE USED TO RAISE PAR ABOVE GUTTER AND REDUCE "ROLLER COASTER" SHOULD BE USED FOR NEGATIVE SLOPED DRIVEWAYS. DW CURB TYPE 2 CURB FOR DRIVEWAYS ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE ABOVE SIDEWALK CRITERIA. CAN MATCH ROADWAY GRADE IF ROADWAY GRADE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. RAMPS IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK PROFILES EXCEED 5.0%, EXCEPT SIDEWALK PROFILES VARIABLE VARIABLE APRON CURB PAN GUTTER THE APPROACHING SIDEWALK WIDTH. SIDEWALK OFFSET TO BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO HALF 11 CURB AND GUTTER. SEE SHEET 2 FOR MORE INFORMATION. VALLEY GUTTER APRON TO BE POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE 11 12 SEE SHEET 2 FOR CURB TYPE INFORMATION. 12 12 11 OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 1 OF 4STANDARD PLAN 5-297.254 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO. APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:254-1 Driveway and Sidewalk Details1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 13 41 FLOW LINE 6% GUTTER FACE FLOW LINE 6% GUTTER FACE TYPE CURB EXISTING COMMENTS GUTTER FACE FLOW LINE 6% CURB BACK E1 LINE FLOW S1 S3 E5 E2 L1 BACK CURB E4 S2 E3 L2 L3 E1 LINE FLOW S2 S3 E5 E4E2 L2 L3 STATION SIDE E1 E2 L1 S1 E3 L2 S2 E4 L3 S3 E5 FT %FT %FT % FLOW LINE 6% GUTTER FACE CURB BACK 1" STANDARD CURB AT DRIVEWAY % NOTES: (REFER TO PREVIOUS SHEET) (REFER TO PREVIOUS SHEET) SECTION C-C (REFER TO PREVIOUS SHEET) LINE FLOW E1 S2 S3E4 E5 E2 L2 L3 BACK CURB BACK CURB TABULATIONDRIVEWAY CURB BACK CURB BACK 1 2 1 SHOULD BE DESIGNED AT 1.5%. 2 PRACTICES SUCH AS DRIVEWAY CURB HEIGHTS, EXTENDING L3 AND/ OR STEEPEN S3. GRADES ARE STEEPER DO NOT MAKE GRADES APPRECIABLY WORSE BY USING BEST S1 8% MAX PREFERRED, 10% MAX. COMMERCIAL AND 12% MAX. RESIDENTIAL. IF EXISTING EXAMPLE SHOWN TO BE INCLUDED IN PLAN FOR EACH DRIVEWAY. DESIGN MANUAL, CHAPTER 5, FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGNS OF DRIVEWAYS. FOR MORE THAN 5' ANALYZE THE NEED FOR VERTICAL CURVE(S). SEE ROAD S3 8% MAX PREFERRED, IF THIS SLOPE IS EXCEEDED OR IS CONTINUED GUTTER FACE FLOW LINE 6% 2" CURB BACK 1.5" 1.5" 3 3 DW CURB TYPE 2 DW CURB TYPE 3DW CURB STANDARD AS WELL. DW CURB STANDARD SHOULD BE USED IF THERE IS ON STREET PARKING. PEDESTRIAN RAMP. THE MAX. APRON SLOPE MUST ADHERE TO ADA CRITERIA DW CURB STANDARD SHALL BE USED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY ACTS AS A TYPE 2 CAN BE USED TO HELP KEEP THE WATER ON PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WHERE ROADWAY DRAINAGE IS A CONCERN (NEGATIVE SLOPED APRON) DW CURB DW CURB TYPE 3 SHALL ONLY BE USED IN EXTREME TIE-IN CASES. VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED SECTION B-B SECTION A-A 3" VG 220 20" VALLEY GUTTER CURB VG 324 OTHER CURB HEIGHTS & CURB APRON LENGTHS CAN BE USED 24" AFTER UTILIZING BEST PRACTICES SUCH AS MAXIMIZING S1, S3, AND L3. AND TIERED DRIVEWAYS. DW CURB TYPES 2 AND 3 SHALL ONLY BE USED DW CURB STANDARD SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT FOR ALL PERPENDICULAR 1" 1" TYPE DRIVEWAY OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 2 OF 4STANDARD PLAN 5-297.254 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO. APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:254-2 Driveway and Sidewalk Details1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 14 41 NOTES: WALK PRIVATE PLAN 8 IN. PAVEMENTWALK 4 IN.6 IN. PAV'T.QUADRANTS 6 IN. WALK AT ENTRANCE COMMERCIAL/ALLEY ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PARALLEL OFFSET DRIVEWAY TIERED PERPENDICULAR DRIVEWAY TIERED PERPENDICULAR 1 2 3 9 10 11 4 5 6 7 8 2 4 4 4 55 6 6 10 10 11 INSTEAD OF 6" HIGH CURB TO HELP THIS PROBLEM WHEN APPLICABLE. CONTINUOUS OR AT LEAST IN THE UPPER HALF OF CURB HEIGHT. 4" HIGH CURB SHOULD BE USED TO MINIMIZE SIDEWALK "ROLLER COASTER" EFFECT IT IS DESIRABLE TO KEEP THE PAR ELEVATION 1:3 MIN. AND 1:5 MIN. PREFERRED SIDEWALK OFFSET TAPER FOR DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT. 1:10 MIN. SIDEWALK OFFSET TAPER REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROJECTS. SEE ROAD DESIGN MANUAL, CHAPTER 5, FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF DRIVEWAYS. TRANSITION DRIVEWAY THICKNESS TO WALK THICKNESS. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT LENGTH VARIES 1/4'' R. SECTION A-A SLOPE 0.06 FT./FT. 0.015 FT./FT. 5.0 FT. 1/4'' R. VARIABLE WIDTH (TYP.) 1/4'' R. TOWARD ROADWAY 0.015 FT./FT. TYPICAL 4" 1 5 7 7 8 8 2 2 2 31 SURFACES AND FOR ALL TIERED DRIVEWAYS WITH GRASS BOULEVARDS. 8% TO 10% FLARES SHALL BE USED WHEN ADJACENT TO WALKABLE 3 TRANSITION CURB RAMP THICKNESS TO WALK THICKNESS. 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 44 1 1 1 1 1 1 DRIVEWAY PERPENDICULAR WALK 4 IN. DRIVEWAY PERPENDICULAR INCREMENTALLY BE REDUCED TO 4.5' OR 4' MIN AFTER ALL OTHER OPTIONS HAVE BEEN APPLIED. TO MATCH APPROACHING SIDEWALK PAR WIDTHS. IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS PAR WIDTHS CAN 5.0' MIN. PAR WIDTH IS THE STANDARD THROUGH DRIVEWAYS. IF FEASIBLE WIDEN DRIVEWAY PAR WIDTH SECTION THRU DRIVEWAY C & G A A VARIABLE VARIABLE SLOPE SLOPE HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE < ENTRANCE SIDEWALK/PAVED BLVD. 5.0 FT. 1' 0'' C & G A A VARIABLE SLOPE SLOPE HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE < ENTRANCE GRASS BLVD. 3' 5.0 FT. VARIABLE 1 5 6 6 7 7 9 JOINT 1/4" DEPTH PERPENDICULAR DRIVEWAYS WITH GRASS BOULEVARDS BOULEVARDS AND ALL TIERED DRIVEWAYS PERPENDICULAR DRIVEWAYS WITH CONCRETE 6" CONCRETE WALK AGGREGATE BASE 3" MINIMUM CLASS 5 4" HIGH ADJACENT CURB SHOULD ALSO BE USED. FROM THE BACK OF CURB. WHEN THE DRIVEWAY IS SLOPING DOWN FROM THE ROADWAY (NEGATIVE) 4" HIGH ADJACENT CURB IS PREFERRED WHEN BOULEVARDS 4' OR LESS ARE PRESENT MEASURED SQUARE PANELS (MAXIMUM WIDTH 15 FT. BETWEEN JOINTS). FORM CONTRACTION JOINT AS NEEDED TO PRODUCE APPROXIMATELY LANDING REQUIRED, SEE NEXT SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. SECTION THRU CURB RAMP SECTION THRU WALK MATCH INPLACE DRIVEWAY WIDTH, MATERIAL TYPE AND THICKNESS. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CROSS-SLOPE, SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.02 FT./FT. AS CONSTRUCTED. 5 1/2 IN. PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL PER MnDOT SPEC. 3702, EXCEPT AT GRASS BOULEVARDS. TIE ONLY IF ADJACENT SECTIONS ARE NOT POURED MONOLITHICALLY. SEE SECTION A-A. OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 3 OF 4STANDARD PLAN 5-297.254 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO. APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:254-3 Driveway and Sidewalk Details1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 15 41 CURB BACK LANDING AREA MAX 2% CROSS SLOPE 6' MIN. PAR REQUIRED WHEN ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS. 4" CONCRETE WALK 1.5% VARIABLE 4" OR 6" CONCRETE WALK 1.5%4" WALK OF DOORWAY THRESHOLD FLUSH WITH BOTTOM WALK TO MEET DOORWAY DOORWAY OF DOOR HINGE SIDE OF DOOR LATCH SIDE A B DOORWAY WIDTH + A B ON DOORWAY 5' MIN. CENTERED BUILDING FACE 3 2 2 1 ALCOVE SIDEWALK LANDING REQUIREMENTS LANDING FACE OF BUILDING BOULEVARD PAVED DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION 1/4" RADIUS (ABOVE DOORWAY) FACE OF BUILDING FOUNDATION BUILDING DOORWAY (WHICHEVER IS GREATER)MIN. 5' OR MATCH PAR WIDTHSIDEWALK PAR PROFILE SIDEWALK PAR PROFILE MATERIAL 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT (POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE) MAX 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE (POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE) MAX 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE SECTION VIEW A-A SECTION VIEW B-B SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SILICONE SPECIFICATIONS. BUILDING JOINT SEAL (INCIDENTAL) 3 4 5 44 5 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER)MIN. 5' OR MATCH PAR WIDTH6 2/3 PAR TO 1/3 BOULEVARD SHOULD BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. COLOR" SILICONE "CLEAR OR GREY IN SEAL JOINT WITH APPROVED FIELD ADJUST SIDEWALK PROFILES TO MEET ALL DOORWAY THRESHOLDS. 2 12" MIN WHEN DOOR SWINGS INWARD FROM BUILDING. 18" MIN. WHEN DOOR SWINGS OUTWARD FROM BUILDING. 1 NOTES: 6 LEGEND LESS THAN 2% LANDING - ALL SLOPES TO BE 7 1' OPTIONAL AESTHETIC TREATMENT SIDEWALK MUST MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING TO THE ROADWAY. LANDING CRITERIA IS REQUIRED FOR ALL DOORS, PRIVATE WALKS AND STEPS. 10% MAX. FOR SHORT SECTIONS ALLOWED TO ACCOUNT FOR FIELD TOLERANCES. 1%-5% FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE BLOCK, WITH EXCEPTIONS UP TO 8% IN CONSTRAINED AREAS. FURNISH AND INSTALL BACKER ROD OF APPROPRIATE DIAMETER. FACE OF BUILDING 7 8 8 2% MAX. PER BUILDING CODE. IF GREATER THAN 2%, FLATTEN AS FEASIBLE. THRESHOLD DOORWAY CONCRETE, AND/OR EXCESSIVE JOINTING. TO MINIMIZE VIBRATION AND ROLLING RESISTANCE, AREA SHOULD BE FREE OF PAVERS, STAMPED PLAN VIEW DOORWAY PLAN VIEW DOORWAY WITH ALCOVE OPERATIONS ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 23, 2017 REVISION: STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 4 OF 4STANDARD PLAN 5-297.254 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK DETAILS SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO. APPROVED: REVISED: 1-23-2017 Model:254-4 Driveway and Sidewalk Details1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 16 41 CURB SIDEWALK SHOULDER 1.5' 1.0' CHECK SLOT ALTERNATIVE CHECK SLOT WHERE BLANKET CONTINUES CHECK SLOT AT BEGINNING OF BLANKET 1.5' 3' 3' 6' 2' 20" 4' SLOPES FLATTER THAN 1:2 SLOPES 1:2 TO 1:1 CHANNEL AND DITCH APPLICATIONS 1.5' 3' 2' 4' 6"6"L 1' TO 3' BLANKET OVERLAP GENERAL BLANKET INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS CHECK SLOT REQUIREMENTS INSERT BLANKET INTO ENTIRE TRENCH PERIMETER. 6" 6" L 6" 1' TO 3' WATER FLOW CHECK SLOT DETAILS SHOULDER BLANKET STAPLE PATTERN GREATER THAN 2% DITCH GRADES 12" AT SEAMS FOR 4 2 3 CHECK BLANKET 1 4" 4" 6" THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. PLACE SINGLE ROW STAPLES AT 3' SPACING ALONG PLACE SINGLE ROW STAPLES AT 12" SPACING PLACE SINGLE ROW STAPLES AT 12" SPACING FLOW SLOPE 4" 4" 5 6 CHECK STAPLE FLOW DITCH BLANKET STAPLE DETAIL 6" 6" IN LIEU OF TRENCH REINFORCED MATRIX FIBER MATRIX OR HYDRAULIC BONDED 6" 4" DITCH BLANKET CRITICAL POINTS OVERLAPS AND SEAMS 7 LAY PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH SOIL AND TAMP. OVERLAP/WRAP 2' FLOW STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 3 OF 3STANDARD PLAN 5-297.404 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SHEET NO. OF SHEETS APPROVED: REVISED:REPP (BLANKET) STAPLE PATTERN FOR SLOPES PREPARE SOIL AS PER SPECIFICATION 2574. REPP = ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION PRODUCT. OVERLAP ADJACENT STRIP EDGES A MINIMUM OF 4". DIG 6" BY 6" TRENCH. OVERLAP. PLACE SINGLE ROW STAPLES AT 3' SPACING ON OVER TOP END OF LOWER BLANKET. STAPLE ALONG OVERLAP EVERY 1.5'. OVERLAP BLANKET 6" (MINIMUM) AT EACH END. OVERLAP BOTTOM END OF UPPER BLANKET THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE. FROM 3 1IF SLOPE LENGTH (L) IS 100' OR GREATER, INSERT BLANKET INTO A CHECK SLOT THE UPPERMOST BLANKET OF ALL SLOPE APPLICATIONS MUST START IN A CHECK SLOT. NOTES: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PATTERNS. CRITICAL POINTS SHALL BE SECURED WITH PROPER STAPLE 5%-7% 25' INTERVALS 3%-5% 50' INTERVALS 2.5%-3% 100' INTERVALS USE BLANKET CHECKS FOR THE FOLLOWING SLOPES: STAGGERED 4" APART AND AT 4" SPACING. GRADE AT 100' INTERVALS. PLACE DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES USE STAPLE CHECK FOR CHANNEL SLOPES LESS THAN 2.5%. PLACE SINGLE ROW OF STAPLES AT 12" SPACING. SPACING. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH SOIL AND TAMP. ROW OF STAPLES ON TOP AND TRENCH SIDES AT 12" USE 6" X 6" TRENCH TO PLACE BLANKET. PLACE SINGLE AND 4" ON CENTER. PLACE DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" APART USE CHECK SLOT DETAIL (NO ALTERNATES). 120 STAPLES PER 100 SQ YD 170 STAPLES PER 100 SQ YD 350 STAPLES PER 100 SQ YD TOE OF SLOPE SHOULD BE 0.33*L FROM THAN 100', CHECK SLOT WHEN L IS GREATER SLOPE INTERSECTION CHANNEL BOTTOM/SIDE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER REVISION: APPROVED: JANUARY 8, 2020 MARNI KARNOWSKI 1-8-2020 THOMAS STYRBICKI CITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103Model:404-3 Permanent Erosion Control1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 17 41 MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY: 5 FT./SEC. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES MINIMUM WATER DEPTH: 1 FT. MAXIMUM WATER DEPTH: 3 FT. 2 OF WATER 1/3 DEPTH 18 - 24 IN. FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL SILT FENCE TYPE TB SILT CURTAIN OR 1 2 3 4 FOR ANCHOR SPACING AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, SEE SPEC. 2573. NOTES: 5 SEE SPECS. 2573, 3886, 3887 & 3893. PURPOSES. ENDS AND SPECIAL AREAS FOR VISIBILITY. PLACE BUOYS AS REQUIRED FOR NAVIGATIONAL ON U.S. COAST GUARD OR OTHER MOTORIZED WATERWAYS, BUOYS ARE REQUIRED TO MARK THE 6 WINTER IF ICE UP OR ICE FLOW IS ANTICIPATED. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. SILT CURTAIN SHOULD ALSO BE REMOVED BEFORE SILT CURTAIN SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE AREA CONTRIBUTING DIRECT RUNOFF HAS BEEN 7 8 BUT IN NO CASE SHALL EMBEDMENT BE LESS THAN 2 FEET. EMBED POST INTO BOTTOM A MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE WATER DEPTH (INCLUDING WAVE HEIGHT), OF 100 LBS. CONNECTION METHOD MUST ALLOW FOR SLEEVE TO MOVE FREELY ON POST. ANCHOR FLOAT MUST BE CONNECTED SECURELY TO SLEEVE WITH A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH CARRIER FLOAT STEEL TENSION CABLE WATER SURFACE CURTAIN DEPTHCURTAIN WEIGHT 7 1 ANCHOR CABLE ANCHOR1 4 BOTTOM VARIABLE LENGTH CURTAIN FABRIC LAKE OR MARSH 1 6 FT. MAX. BUOY (TYP.)3 TOE OF SLOPE PLAN VIEW FOR LAKE OR MARSH 5 PERIMETER CONTROL PERIMETER CONTROL WATER SURFACE BOTTOM EMBEDMENT2 FT. MIN. POSTWATER DEPTH2 FT. MAX.SURFACEABOVE WATER1 FT. MIN. EXTENDSANDBAGS WITH GEOTEXTILE FLAP OF 1 FT. MIN. ANCHOR AT EACH FENCE POST HOLD FLAP IN PLACE ROCK, SUFFICIENT TO WITH CLEAN SAND OR SANDBAGS FILLED PLACE ROCK LOGS OR RIVER BANK FLOW OF WATERWAY WORK AREA TEMPORARY FILL OR CULVERT EXT., BRIDGE ABUTMENT, MEETS WATER SURFACE POINT WHERE FILL BANK STREAM WIDTH THE STREAM/RIVER LESS THAN 1/3 1 2 ANCHOR TO LAND (TYP.) STEEL FENCE POST 3BUOY (TYP.) 45° 45° PLAN VIEW FOR STREAM ROCK BERM TEMPORARY 5 6 STEEL TENSION CABLE WATER SURFACE CURTAIN DEPTHCURTAIN WEIGHT 4 BOTTOM CURTAIN FABRIC VARIABLE LENGTH 8 7 ANCHOR TO LAND (TYP.) STEEL FENCE POST MAXIMUM WATER DEPTH: 10 FT. MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY: 2 FT./SEC. MINIMUM WATER DEPTH: 3 FT. MAXIMUM WAVE HEIGHT: 1 FT TYPE: STILL WATER FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN INSTALLATION GUIDELINES 4 AND CARRIER FLOAT STEEL TENSION CABLE CURTAIN DEPTHBUOY (TYP.)3 2 FT. TO 10 FT.TEMPORARY ROCK BERM MAXIMUM WATER DEPTH: 10 FT. MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY: 5 FT./SEC. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES MINIMUM WATER DEPTH: 3 FT. TYPE: MOVING WATER FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN 4 FRONT VIEW FOR FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN 2 FT. TO 10 FT.3 FT. TO 10 FT.FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN ALTERNATE FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN INDICATED IN THE PLANS. THE TEMPORARY ROCK BERM IS INCIDENTAL. WHEN THE WORK IS COMPLETE THE RIPRAP CAN THEN BE MOVED TO THE PERMANENT LOCATION ROCK BERM CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION. IN AREAS WHERE THE PLAN CALLS FOR RIPRAP AT A BRIDGE, CULVERT, OR SLOPE, A TEMPORARY PROVIDE SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF POST ANCHORS TO MAINTAIN SILT CURTAIN POSITION. SILT FENCE TYPE TB OR SILT FENCE TYPE TP FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN SILT CURTAIN FOR FLOTATION ANCHORS IN WATER SILT CURTAIN) (TYP. OF FLOTATION UNDERWATER ANCHOR SILT FENCE TYPE TB SILT FENCE TYPE TB. OR SILT FENCE TYPE TB FOR DETERMINING APPLICABILITY OF FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN OR MINIMUM WATER DEPTH APPLIES TO THE DEEPEST POINT ALONG THE FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN CABLE WIRE T POST TIE WIREWIRE CABLE AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING STEEL FENCE "T" POST POST "T" TIES PLASTIC GEOMEMBRANE FABRIC, 72 IN. WIDE MAXIMUM WAVE HEIGHT: 2 FT.8 IN.POCKET HEM FABRIC FOLDED FABRIC/CABLE/POST CONNECTION CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER REVISION: APPROVED: 2-28-2017 (EXTEND 18 IN. MIN. BELOW WATER SURFACE) EQUIVALENT TO SLIDE FREELY OVER POST 2-1/2 IN. SCH 40 PVC SLEEVE OR SLEEVE CONNECTED TO CARRIER FLOAT, OR EQUIVALENT POST 1-1/2 INCH RIGID STEEL CONDUIT SILT FENCE TYPE TB FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN OR LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN. (50 LB. TENSILE) PLASTIC ZIP TIES TENSILE 50 LB. TIE, WIRE CABLE WIRE STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 1 OF 8STANDARD PLAN 5-297.405 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL SILT CURTAIN OR SILT FENCE TYPE TB SHEET NO. OF SHEETSCITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103 APPROVED: REVISED: 2-28-2017 Model:405-1 Temporary Erosion Control1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 18 41 8" DIA. TYPE 9 MULCH MANHOLE CATCH BASIN/ FLANGES FLAP POCKET PIECE OF FABRIC. MADE FROM SINGLE BOTTOM TO BE FRONT, BACK, AND INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH NOTES: AND ON FLAP POCKETS AROUND SIDE PIECES STITCHED SEAMS ALL MINIMUM DOUBLE TYPE 9 MULCH 1 1 3 SPACING WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE 1:21:2 DROP INLET WITH GRATETUBE RISERFILTER SOCK 2'-0"2 1/2" D=2" TUBE RISER 14.75" R 5' MIN. LENGTH POST 2" 2" 6" 6" DIAMETER 8" 12" 4" 2" SURFACE ELEV. SOCK TO BE BELOW ROAD ADJUST LEVEL OF FILTER 2.5' MAX ON ALL POSTS GEOTEXTILE IN PLACE (50 LB TENSILE) HOLDS PLASTIC ZIP TIES 2 5 4 TYPE 9 MULCH 12" OUT LAY GEOTEXTILE UNDER GEOTEXTILE ANCHORAGE24"10"-12"12"12"USE WHERE INLET DRAINS IN AN AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 or LESS 2 6 5 4 3 BUTT JOINTS 6 10 INCHES AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL. FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 50 PSI. ZIP TIE. AGGREGATE FILL. SECURED WITH PREVENT LOSS OF OPEN GRADED ENDS SECURELY CLOSED TO SECTION SECTION PERSPECTIVE VIEW (DOWN POSITION)(UP POSITION) FILTER BAG INSERT SEDIMENT CONTROL INLET HAT SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES VARIES. SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES, LENGTH EXTEND 10" BEYOND GRATE ROD WITH WOOD 2" X 4") . WITH CAST CURB BOX REPLACE FOR REMOVAL ( FOR INLETS USE REBAR OR STEEL ROD POP-UP HEAD 1 TUBE RISER POLYETHYLENE FLANGES AND A LID/COVER. FOR WATER INFILTRATION; HAVE AN OVERFLOW OPENING, THE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE; HAVE PERFORATIONS TO ALLOW OR PLASTIC/POLYETHYLENE RISER SIZED TO FIT INSIDE THE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER SHALL BE A METAL NOTE: GROUND LINE EMBODIMENT18" MN. POST8" DIRECTIONS, MEETING SPEC. 3886. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) OVERFLOW HOLES (2" X 4" HOLE SHALL SOCK HEIGHT MUST NOT BE SO HIGH AS TO SLOW DOWN WATER FILTRATION TO CAUSE FLOODING OF THE ROADWAY. ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A STEEL COVER 3/16" THICK (MIN.) STEEL PLATE 3/16" THICK (MIN.) STEEL PLATE 3/16" THICK (MIN.) ROCK LOG/COMPOST LOG 1/2 W DW 1/ 2 DCONFORMING TO SPEC. 3137 TABLE 3137-1; CA-3 GRADATION. AGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND DURABLE PARTICLES OF COARSE AGGREGATE HEAT BONDED SEAM (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR PROVIDE A GEOTEXTILE SOCK BETWEEN 4-10 FEET LONG AND 4-6 INCH DIAMETER. SEAM TO BE WIRE REINFORCED WITH 36" GEOTEXTILE SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, & 3886. THAT WOULD IMPEED TRAFFIC FLOW. DEVICES MUST BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY AS TO NOT CAUSE FLOODING ON ROADWAY TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. PLACED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. THE DO NOT PLACE FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES, INSTALLATION NOTES: CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER REVISION: APPROVED: 2-28-2017 STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 4 OF 8STANDARD PLAN 5-297.405 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION SHEET NO. OF SHEETSCITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103 APPROVED: REVISED: 2-28-2017 Model:405-4 Temporary Erosion Control1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 19 41 1:6 TYPICALVARIABLE 10-20% SLOPE GRADE 25' MIN. WITH TOE OF SLOPE FUTURE BRIDGE ROADWAY SHOULDER VARI ABLE1:2 TYP. BRIDGE END SLOPEEMBANKMENT TOE OF SLOPE FUTURE BRIDGE ROADWAY SHOULDER VARI ABLE1:2 TYP. BRIDGE END SLOPEEMBANKMENT SAND BAG BARRIER SILT FENCE TO MEET TOE OF EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE WRAPPED AROUND TOE OF SLOPE FUTURE BRIDGE ROADWAY SHOULDER VARI ABLE1:2 TYP. EMBANKMENT EMBANKMENT OR WORK ROAD END SLOPE MEET SHEETING SILT FENCE TO FROM TOE OF END SLOPE. COURSE. EXTEND 50 FT. BACK HIGH ADJACENT TO WATER SAND BAG BARRIER 3 FT. < ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SLOPE AND OUTSIDE OF SILT FENCE NEAR TOE OF SILT FENCE TO STREAM WORK AREA DRAINS DISTRURBED SOIL, LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LARGER EQUIPMENT) (MAY BE LARGER WITH TURNING RADIUS = 10' MINIMUM POSSIBLE SILT FENCE STREAM BANK OR TOE OF SLOPE STREAM BANK OR TOE OF SLOPE PLAN VIEW NOTES: SEE SPECS. 2573, 3149 & 3886. BACK FROM TOE OF END SLOPE. TO WATER COURSE. EXTEND 10 FT. TEMPORARY SHEETING ADJACENT PERSPECTIVE VIEW J-HOOK INSTALLATION GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36 IN. WIDE 6 IN. MIN. 6 IN. MIN.EMBEDMENT2 FT. MIN. POSTMIN. 12 IN. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIN. 6 IN. LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN. (50 LB. TENSILE) PLASTIC ZIP TIES FLOWFLOW NATURAL SOIL BACKFILL WITH TAMPED FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1 AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POST AGGREGATE COARSE FILTER EMBEDMENT2 FT. MIN. POSTLOCATED IN TOP 8 IN. (50 LB. TENSILE) PLASTIC ZIP TIES TIRE COMPACTION ZONE AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POST MACHINE SLICE 8 IN. - 12 IN. DEPTH FLOW FLOW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36 IN. WIDE 6 IN. MIN. 6 IN. MIN.EMBEDMENT18 IN. MIN. POSTGEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36 IN. WIDE STAPLES (TYP.) AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POST FLOWFLOW NATURAL SOIL BACKFILL WITH TAMPED FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. 2 2 3 2 3 SEE OPTIONAL METHOD DETAIL OPTIONAL METHOD 90 0 92 0 910 INSTALLATION AT BRIDGE EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO WATER (HAND INSTALLED) SILT FENCE TYPE HI (MACHINE SLICED) SILT FENCE TYPE MS (PREASSEMBLED) SILT FENCE TYPE PA 4 5 6 4 5 6 SILT FENCE ONLY SILT FENCE WITH SAND BAGS SILT FENCE WITH SHEETING CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER REVISION: APPROVED: 2-28-2017 LOCATION AT TOE OF ROADWAY EMBANKMENT CONTRIBUTING SLOPE AREA: 3 ACRES. WATER COURSE FLOW VELOCITY: 8 TO 15 FT./SEC. CONTRIBUTING SLOPE AREA: 1. ACRE. WATER COURSE FLOW VELOCITY: 1 TO 7 FT./SEC. CONTRIBUTING SLOPE AREA: 1./2 ACRE. WATER COURSE FLOW VELOCITY: STANDING. TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA: 0.25 ACRE. TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA: 1 ACRE. COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (SPEC. 3149) SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 1 STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 6 OF 8STANDARD PLAN 5-297.405 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL SILT FENCE SHEET NO. OF SHEETSCITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103 APPROVED: REVISED: 2-28-2017 Model:405-6 Temporary Erosion Control1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 20 41 1 2 3 4 5 2 % MIN. LC SECTION VIEW NOTES: DETAILS. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION 6 7 4 6 6 66 6 6 SHOULDER DRIVING LANE 8 SEE SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETAILS SEE ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 7TYPICAL EDGE DRAIN AND DISCHARGE CROSS SECTION ( SEE TABULATION FOR LOCATIONS ) 7 3 FLOWFLOW7 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW ( LOW POINT "Y" DISCHARGE ) 1 4 7 ( SEE TABULATION FOR LOCATIONS ) ( SEE TABULATION FOR LOCATIONS ) TYPICAL PLAN VIEW ( SINGLE DISCHARGE ) 7"- 10" WIDE TRENCH 4 5 7 75 2 8 1 2 8 82PIPE DRAIN ___ " DIA. PERFORATED TP OR PE 1 FLOW7CONNECTION 7 7CONNECTION 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 12" MIN. STRAIGHT 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 12" MIN. STRAIGHT CONCRETE HEADWALL 4" PRECAST STRAIGHT 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 5CONNECTION ( INCIDENTAL ) 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN ''Y'' 7"-10" WIDE TRENCH CONCRETE HEADWALL 4" PRECAST 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 5 7 4'' DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN CONCRETE HEADWALL 4'' PRECAST 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 12" MIN. STRAIGHT PIPE DRAIN ___ " DIA. PERFORATED TP OR PE 4" DIA. TP PIPE DRAIN 3' RADIUS 3' RADIUS 3' RADIUS PIPE DRAIN. LENGTH INCLUDED AND PAID FOR AS SPEC. 2502, 4 INCH DIA. TP 1 FT. MIN. 3 INCH OR 4 INCH DIAMETER. 2502, __ INCH PERFORATED TP OR PE PIPE DRAIN. LESS THAN 0.2% . LENGTH INCLUDED AND PAID FOR AS SPEC. MAXIMUM LENGTH 500 FT., EXCEPT 300 FT. MAXIMUM FOR GRADES SPEC. 2502, 4 INCH PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL. PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL STANDARD PLATE 3131 PAID FOR AS PIPE DRAIN ___ " DIA. PERFORATED TP OR PE CONNECTION, 11 INCH TP PIPE AND COUPLING TO BE INCIDENTAL. APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. PAYMENT FOR '' Y '' AND EXTRA DETAILS OF CONNECTION AND COUPLING TO PIPE SHALL BE PERFORATIONS DOWN. ARE INCIDENTAL. PLACE PERFORATED PIPE WITH THE CAPPED AS APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER, THE CAPS THE UPSTREAM ENDS OF THE PERFORATED PIPE SHALL BE REVISION: APPROVED: 8-6-2014 REVISION: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MATERIALS AND ROAD RESEARCH STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 1 OF 1STANDARD PLAN 5-297.433 TRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT SUBSURFACE DRAINS OUTLET PIPES FOR EDGE AND SUBCUT DRAINS SHEET NO. OF SHEETSCITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103 APPROVED: REVISED: 8-6-2014 Model:433-1 Subsurface Headwall1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 21 41STATE DESIGN ENGINEERTRANSPORTATION OF DEPARTMENT APPROVED: REVISED:PATH & FILENAME:$$$@PATHFILENAME@$$$DISTRICT #:$@DISTRICT@$PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:$$@IPLOT$NAME@$$$$$$@DATE@$$$$FLEXIBLE STORM SEWER PIPE ARCH BEDDINGRIGID STORM SEWER PIPE ARCH BEDDING 17. 2 H = FILL COVER HEIGHT OVER PIPE (FEET). = UNDISTURBED SOIL FOR RIGID AND FLEXIBLE PIPE STANDARD STORM SEWER BEDDING 42" 54" RIGID STORM SEWER PIPE BEDDING FLEXIBLE STORM SEWER PIPE BEDDING TRENCH BASE WIDTH 1 2 POLYPROPYLENE (PP), CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE (CP) AND POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC). RIGID PIPE INCLUDES CONCRETE. FLEXIBLE PIPE INCLUDES METAL, AND PLASTIC MATERIALS SUCH AS CORRUGATED THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE OF THE RELEVANT STORM SEWER PAY ITEM. EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL WITH SELECT GRADING MATERIAL ARE NOT TABULATED SEPARATELY BUT ARE INCLUDED IN CONTRACT UNIT PRICE OF THE RELEVANT STORM SEWER PAY ITEM. FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING INCLUDING THE COST OF EXCAVATION, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION IS INCLUDED IN THE TRENCH WIDTH EQUAL TO THE PIPE TRENCH WIDTH. QUANTITIES. FOR APRONS WITHOUT RIPRAP PLACE 6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING UNDER APRONS. USE A WHEN RIPRAP IS REQUIRED AT THE APRON END, SEE STANDARD PLATE OR PLAN FOR RIPRAP INSTALLATION AND PROTECT ALL PIPE DURING CONSTRUCTION PER SPEC. 2503. PIPE SIZE IS BASED ON THE NOMINAL INSIDE DIAMETER OR SPAN. EXCAVATE & CONSTRUCT ALL TRENCHES AND SLOPES PER OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 1 OF 1STANDARD PLAN 5-297.442 DI S IPIPE DIA. OR AFTER PIPE PLACEMENT = LOOSE BEDDING, COMPACTED = COMPACTED BEDDING SHEET NO. OF SHEETS SI So TRENCH WIDTH = B Do DI TRENCH WIDTH = B DI 12"Do TRENCH WIDTH = B SI TRENCH WIDTH = B12"So 42" TO 54" TRENCH WIDTH B (TYP.) AREA HAUNCH SPRINGLINE SPRINGLINE (TYP.) AREA HAUNCH (TYP.) AREA HAUNCH SPRINGLINE (TYP.) AREA HAUNCH SPRINGLINE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES PIPE DIA. 12"5'-2" 15"5'-6" 36"9'-6" 30"8'-0" 24"6'-6" 18"5'-9" 42"11'-0" 48"12'-6" MODIFY TRENCH WIDTH & SLOPE AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH OSHA REQUIREMENTS. (FEET) TRENCH WIDTH -LEGEND- COMPLETE REMAINING BACKFILL. RIGID PIPE AND 12" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE WHEN COMPACTED. PLACE AND COMPACT BACKFILL EVENLY AND SIMULTANEOUSLY IN 6" LIFTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE UP TO THE SPRINGLINE FOR THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF PIPE IS SUPPORTED UNIFORMLY BY BEDDING. COMPACT THE REMAINING MATERIAL OUTSIDE THE HAUNCH AREA TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPEC. 2106 ENSURING DEVICE (I.E. POLE TAMPER, JUMPING JACK, OR SIMILAR). ENTIRE LENGTH OF HAUNCH UNDER THE PIPE). THEN COMPACT THE HAUNCH AT AN ANGLE USING A POWERED MECHANICAL OR PNEUMATIC PIPE UNDERNEATH THE HAUNCH AREA BY FIRST SHOVEL SLICING (MANUALLY SHOVE THE BLADE END OF SHOVEL AT AN ANGLE DOWN THE AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE PIPE, PLACE ADDITIONAL FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING AND COMPACT THE FULL LENGTH ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FURNISH AND INSTALL PIPE TO GRADE. FOR PIPES WITH BELL, REMOVE MATERIAL IN BELL AREA PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. LOOSELY PLACE 6" OF FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING MATERIAL TO GRADE. DO NOT COMPACT PRIOR TO PIPE PLACEMENT. USE PLASTIC PIPE TABLE FOR TRENCH WIDTHS WHEN FILL HEIGHT IS GREATER THAN 10 FT. oD + 24" 1.5 x oD oD + 36" WITH H 10 FT. 1 2 PLASTIC PIPE IS 3" FOR METAL PIPE AND 1" FOR PLASTIC PIPE. MAXIMUM EMBANKMENT PARTICLE SIZE WITHIN 2 FT. OF PIPE SELECT GRADING MATERIAL PER SPEC. 2106.1.A.6. COMPACT PER SPEC. 2106. BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1 FINE AGGREGATE PIPE PLACEMENT ANY MEANS PRIOR TO DO NOT COMPACT BY BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1. 6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATE IS 3" FOR METAL PIPE AND 1" FOR PLASTIC PIPE. MAXIMUM EMBANKMENT PARTICLE SIZE WITHIN 2 FT. OF PIPE SELECT GRADING MATERIAL PER SPEC. 2106.1.A.6. COMPACT PER SPEC. 2106. BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1 FINE AGGREGATE PIPE PLACEMENT ANY MEANS PRIOR TO DO NOT COMPACT BY BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1. 6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATE COMPACT PER SPEC. 2106. BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1 FINE AGGREGATE 2 FT. OF PIPE IS 3". MAXIMUM EMBANKMENT PARTICLE SIZE WITHIN SELECT GRADING MATERIAL PER SPEC. 2106.1.A.6. PIPE PLACEMENT ANY MEANS PRIOR TO DO NOT COMPACT BY BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1. 6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATE 2 FT. OF PIPE IS 3". MAXIMUM EMBANKMENT PARTICLE SIZE WITHIN SELECT GRADING MATERIAL PER SPEC. 2106.1.A.6. COMPACT PER SPEC. 2106. BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1. FINE AGGREGATE PIPE PLACEMENT ANY MEANS PRIOR TO DO NOT COMPACT BY BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1. 6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATED = INSIDE DIAMETER OF ROUND PIPE (INCHES).I oD = OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF ROUND PIPE (INCHES). S = INSIDE SPAN OF PIPE-ARCH (INCHES).I oS = OUTSIDE SPAN OF PIPE-ARCH (INCHES). 01-18-2019 STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: JANUARY 18, 2019 REVISION: CITY PROJ. NO. PW-20-0103Model:442-1 Storm Sewer Bedding1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 4122SHEET NO. OF SHEETSModel:Arden Hills Standard Plates1/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl 4123SHEET NO. OF SHEETSModel:Arden Hills Standard Plates 21/15/2021Last Saved:\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD191801_spn01.dgnFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgPenTbl:hrg.tbl DSSDD13'File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:REM03\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_rem01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE CONCRETE WALK LEGEND REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 0 1 2 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)WYNCREST COURTHAMLINE AVE. REMOVE SIGN TYPE C REMOVE SIGN TYPE C CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) 32'12'PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL, 96 SF +65+77+58+80 +25 +23+22{ HAMLINE EXISTING RETAINING WALL+54+42+45(FULL DEPTH) SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GUTTER, 33 LF REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER, 11 LF REMOVE CURB AND WALK, 3 SY REMOVE CONCRETE WALK, 11 SY REMOVE CONCRETE GUTTER, 22 LF REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER, 21 LF REMOVE CURB AND AMBLE RD) BEFORE CROSSING NEAR (600 FT TO THE NORTH REMOVE SIGN TYPE C RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAYESTIMATEDRIGHT OF WAYESTIMATEDSTA 0+58.49 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) BEGIN SAP 062-650-014 1 3 24 20 SCALE IN FEET PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, INCIDENTAL. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TO ENSURE ADA COMPLIANCE OF THE CONCRETE WALK, 1. PROVIDE A SAWCUT FOR ALL REMOVAL LIMITS GENERAL NOTES: REMOVAL PLANS DDDFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:REM04\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_rem01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 13 14RTE 37 TRAILFLORAL PARK TRAILCONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) REMOVE SIGN TYPE C REMOVE SIGN TYPE C 39' PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL, 112 SF 12'{ HAMLINE HAMLINE AVE +41+80(FULL DEPTH) SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CROSSING NEAR FLORAL DR) (600 FT SOUTH BEFORE REMOVE SIGN TYPE CRIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED STA 13+79.68 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) END SAP 062-650-014 20 SCALE IN FEET 25 32 PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, INCIDENTAL. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TO ENSURE ADA COMPLIANCE OF THE CONCRETE WALK, 1. PROVIDE A SAWCUT FOR ALL REMOVAL LIMITS GENERAL NOTES: REMOVAL PLANS “”COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 DSSDDFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:INT01\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_int01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 LEGEND TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DESIGN B612 (MOD) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TRUNCATED DOMES (SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038) INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. DIMENSIONS XXX CURB HEIGHTX" BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% CONTROL POINTS AT GUTTER FLOW LINE S F DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL 0 1 2 RAMP FAN HAMLINE AVE.WYNCREST COURT120 121 124 126 127 128 129 131132 134 135 100 101 140 141 110 150 6" 0" 0"6" 0"0" 111 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) 151 0"0" 0"0" RAMPS DIRECTIONAL ONE-WAY 5' WALK { HAMLINE CL FSS 6"4" 6"4" 125122 133 130 6"6" 6" 6" 3' 123 6"6" F F 10' RAMP PERPENDICULAR TIERED 6" 6" 6"6"F137 136 12' LANE 4' SHOULDER 12' TURN LANE 12' LANE 4' SHOULDER RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATEDRIGHT OF WAYESTIMATEDRIGHT OF WAYESTIMATEDSTA 0+58.49 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) BEGIN SAP 062-650-014 1 3 27 20 SCALE IN FEET 1 1 4. NEW SIDEWALK JOINTS SHALL BE SAWCUT, INCIDENTAL. WITH THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRUNCATED DOMES. 3. THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL LINE UP 2. ALL PERPENDICULAR RAMPS ARE 4' LONG UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND A RUNNING SLOPE THAT DOES NOT EXCEDD 8.3%. ROUTE WITH A CROSS SLOPE THAT DOES NOT EXCEDD 2.0% MAINTAINING A 4' WIDE (MINIMUM) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 1. LANDINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING SIDEWALKS GENERAL NOTES: CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE DETAIL 1 MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 7113 NOTES: CONSTRUCTION PLANS DDD10'10'File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:INT02\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_int01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW DESIGN B612 (MOD) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LEGEND TRUNCATED DOMES (SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038) INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. DIMENSIONS XXX CURB HEIGHTX" BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% CONTROL POINTS AT GUTTER FLOW LINE F DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 13 14 RAMP DIRECTIONAL ONE-WAY RAMP DIRECTIONAL ONE-WAYRTE 37 TRAILFLORAL PARK TRAILHAMLINE AVE. 200 201 203 206 207 208 209 212214 215 211 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.) 0"0" 0"0" F F 6"6" 6"6" 204 210213 202 205 { HAMLINE 6"6" 216 217 6"6" 4' SHOULDER 12' LANE 12' TURN LANE 12' LANE 4' SHOULDER RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATED STA 13+79.68 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) END SAP 062-650-014 20 SCALE IN FEET 28 32 11 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 4. NEW SIDEWALK JOINTS SHALL BE SAWCUT, INCIDENTAL. WITH THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRUNCATED DOMES. 3. THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL LINE UP 2. ALL PERPENDICULAR RAMPS ARE 4' LONG UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND A RUNNING SLOPE THAT DOES NOT EXCEDD 8.3%. ROUTE WITH A CROSS SLOPE THAT DOES NOT EXCEDD 2.0% MAINTAINING A 4' WIDE (MINIMUM) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 1. LANDINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING SIDEWALKS GENERAL NOTES: CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE DETAIL 1 MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 7113 NOTES: PIPE TABLEPIPE NUMBER US STRUCTUREDS STRUCTURELF 15" RCP US INVERT DS INVERT SLOPEP1STM CB1STM MH128877.47' 877.17'1.09%STRUCTURE TABLESTRUCTURE CASTINGTYPETOP OF CASTING ELEV NORTHING EASTINGSTM CB1 ①R-3067V STORM CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 880.50190026.41' 554388.80'STM MH1 R-4370 GSTORM SEWER MANHOLE WITHSUMP880.07190011.38' 554406.35'① ROTATE MANHOLE AWAY FROM 6 INCH WATERMAIN“”COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVEFORCEMAINSEE NOTE#8 SAND FILL6"STORM SEWERSAND FILLSTORM1"-4"6"-16"12" TO 48"2 FT4 FT54" & LARGER 4 FT8 FTINSULATION TYPES2" MINIMUMTHICKNESSSEWER (DIA)FORCEMAIN DIACOURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 SOIL TYPESSOIL TYPES TYPICALLY FOUND ON THIS PROJECT ARE SAND AND LOAMY SAND.HAMLINE AVE: ADA IMPROVEMENTS FOR EXISTING TRAIL AND SIDEWALK CROSSING AT WYNCREST COURT AND HAMLINE AVE AND ROUTE 37 TRAIL (FLORA PARK) AND HAMLINE AVE. CENTER MEDIAN PEDESTRIAN REFUGES ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED AT BOTH LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS BUT TO ALSO ALERT THE DRIVER THAT THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE ROADWAY USAGE AT THESE LOCATIONS. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS ARE BEING MOVED FROM THE NE AND NW QUADRANTS TO THE SE AND SW QUADRANTS AT WYNCREST CT.PARKING LOT: ADA IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT, CURB AND GUTTER REPLACEMENT, AND IMPROVED OVERLAND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ARE IN THE POOR CONDITION AND ARE IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FORM OF REPLACEMENT. ALL DRAINAGE ON SITE FLOWS ACROSS THE PARING LOT TO THE EAST AND NORTH SIDES OF THE PARKING LOT AND DRAIN OUT THE CURB CUTS AND CONCRETE FLUMES INTO RIPRAP CLASS II.SHOREWOOD DRIVE: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESIDENTS DRIVEWAY AND CITY INFRASTRUCTURE. A SECOND DRAINAGE INLET WILL BE ADDED TO HELP MITIGATE THE CURRENT FLOODING EXTENTS OF THE SITE.THIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY PERSONNEL THAT ARE CERTIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPPS. COPIES OF THE CERTIFICATIONS CAN BE AVAILABLE UPONREQUEST.PROVIDE A CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IN GOOD STANDING WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR WILL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OFTHE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTERCONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORKWILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER.PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE CERTIFIED INSTALLER FOR EACH CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR THAT INSTALLS THE PRODUCTS LISTED INSPECIFICATION SECTION 01536. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK WILL NOT BEALLOWED TO COMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER.DESCRIPTIONLOCATIONTEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURESPERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURESDIRECTION OF FLOWFINAL STABILIZATIONSOILS AND CONSTRUCTION NOTESEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILSSITE MAPWATER RESOURCES NOTESINSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY DAY DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALLEVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. INSPECT ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT, EROSION PREVENTIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION. INSPECT SURFACE WATER INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHESFOR SIGNS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS FOR EVIDENCE OF TRACKING ONTOPAVED SURFACES. INSPECT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF SITE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION.RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS. SUBMIT INSPECTION REPORTS IN A FORMAT THAT ISACCEPTABLE TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING IN THE RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY:A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONSB. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONSC. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONSD. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN, INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIESE. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH IN 24 HOURSF. DOCUMENTS AND CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPPREPLACE, REPAIR OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING DISCOVERY UNLESS LISTEDDIFFERENTLY BELOW:A. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR SUPPLEMENT PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN IT BECOMES NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. COMPLETE REPAIRS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING DISCOVERY.B. REPAIR OR REPLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT AND/OR DEPTH OF THE DEVICE.C. DRAIN AND REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASINS ONCE THE SEDIMENT HAS REACHED 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. COMPLETE WORK WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.D. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. RESTABILIZE ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY SEDIMENT REMOVAL OPERATIONS. SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WORKING IN SURFACE WATERS. CONTACT ALL APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES PRIOR TO WORKING IN SURFACE WATERS.E. REMOVE TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. STREET SWEEPING MAY HAVE TO OCCUR MORE OFTEN TO MINIMIZE OFF SITE IMPACTS. LIGHTLY WET THE PAVEMENT PRIOR TO SWEEPING.F. MAINTAIN ALL BMPS UNTIL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE HAS GONE UNDER FINAL STABILIZATION.THERE ARE NO STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHEOLOGICAL OR AGENCY REVIEW. ALLMITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THIS PLAN SET OR THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A WELL HEAD PROTECTION AREA.THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA). THE DWSMA VULNERABILITY IS CLASSIFIED AS LOW.LOCATIONSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVEPROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATIONRECEIVING WATERSPECIAL WATERINVASIVETMDLTROUTAREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY (AES) AND INFESTED WATERSPROJECT PERSONNEL AND TRAININGPROJECT CONTACTSORGANIZATIONPHONECONTACT NAMEENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWSITE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCELOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTSLOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLANMPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION:651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798TOTAL DISTURBED AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA2,500 sq ft2,250 sq ft 250 sq ftLAND FEATURE CHANGESIN ADDITION TO THE LIST OF SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE WETLANDS WITHIN AND NEAR THE PROJECTBOUNDARY.IMPAIRED WATERTHE REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS MAY BE LOCATED IN MANY PLACES WITHIN THE PLAN SET AS WELL AS IN THE SPECIFICATION.THE NOTES AND TABLE BELOW ARE INTENDED TO BE A QUICK REFERENCE FOR THE CONTRACTOR TOUSE IN THE FIELD. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS INCLUDED ON THE PROJECT THAT ARE NOT LISTEDON THIS SHEET.RECEIVING WATERS(A)CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT, (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.THE RECEIVING WATERS LISTED IN THE TABLE ABOVE ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THEPROJECT SITE. THE IMPAIRED WATERS (LISTED IN TABLE ABOVE) ARE IMPAIRED FOR (A) CONSTRUCTION RELATED AND/OR (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATEDIMPAIRMENTS. CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BMPS AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT.TOTAL PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 60 sq ftTOTAL PROPOSED NET CHANGE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREADAVID SWEARINGREN 651-792-7847CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEERCITY OF ARDEN HILLS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEERTODD BLOMSTROM651-792-784617-19, 27-3016, 29, 3027, 285, 29, 3216-19, 301LAKE JOHANNACITY OF ARDEN HILLS NONONO NO NOHR GREEN, PROJECT ENGINEER JORDAN HOREJSI651-659-7716LITTLE JOHANNA LAKE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS NOYESNO NO NOCREEK AUID 07010206-609CITY OF ARDEN HILLS NOYESNO NO NOOASIS LAKECITY OF ARDEN HILLS NONONO NO NOKARTH LAKELAKE AUID 62 0199 00CITY OF ARDEN HILLS NONONO NO NOCITY OF ARDEN HILLS NONONO NO NOLAKE MARTHA CITY OF SHOREVIEW NONONO NO NOROUND LAKECITY OF ARDEN HILLS NONONO NO NONOYESNO NO NOVALENTINE LAKECITY OF ARDEN HILLS16, 29, 3031-33COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446J:\2019\191557.01\CAD\Dwgs\Sheets\44.dwg1/18/2021 2:35:01 PMXrefs: xgt-1-dh01-bdr-full 06/22/2006/22/20 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (CONTINUED)GENERAL SWPPP NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYPOLLUTION PREVENTIONSTABILIZATION TIME FRAMES1. PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH WORK LOCATION ON THE SITE.2. STORE ALL BUILDING MATERIALS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENTCHEMICALS, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER AND WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.3. PROVIDE A SECURE STORAGE AREA WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS FOR ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE. RETURN ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALSAND TOXIC WASTE TO THE DESIGNATED STORAGE AREA AT THE END OF THE BUSINESS DAY UNLESS INFEASIBLE. STORE ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ANDTOXIC WASTE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT, PETROLEUM BASED PRODUCTS, WOODPRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY.4. STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE OF ALL SOLID WASTE.5. POSITION ALL PORTABLE TOILETS SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND CANNOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SANITARY WASTE.6. FUEL AND MAINTAIN VEHICLES IN A DESIGNATED CONTAINED AREA WHENEVER FEASIBLE. USE DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENT MATERIALS TO PREVENT SPILLSOR LEAKED CHEMICALS FROM DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATER OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH LOCATION THATVEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT ARE FUELED OR MAINTAINED AT.7. LIMIT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENTBASIN OR OTHER EFFECTIVE CONTROL. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE GENERATED BY VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING. ENGINE DEGREASING ISNOT ALLOWED ON THE SITE.8. PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OF CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS,CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND. DESIGN THECONTAINMENT SO THAT IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR CONTAINMENT AREA.9. CREATE AND FOLLOW A WRITTEN DISPOSAL PLAN FOR ALL WASTE MATERIALS. INCLUDE IN THE PLAN HOW THE MATERIAL WILL BE DISPOSED OF AND THELOCATION OF THE DISPOSAL SITE. SUBMIT PLAN TO THE ENGINEER.10. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS GRINDINGS, CUTTINGS, MILLINGS, ANDOTHER BITUMINOUS WASTES FROM AREAS OF EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED SOILS AND FROM ALL WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS,DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES.11. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT CONCRETE DUST, PARTICLES, CONCRETE WASH OUT, AND OTHER CONCRETE WASTESFROM LEAVING MNDOT RIGHT OF WAY, DEPOSITING IN EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED AREAS, AND FROM ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCESYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT SAW CUT SLURRY ANDPLANING WASTE FROM LEAVING MNDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND FROM ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS INCLUDING DITCHES AND CULVERTS.1. AMEND THE SWPPP AND DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THE SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED PLAN SHEETS IN A TIMELY MANNER. STORE THE SWPPP AND ALLAMENDMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.2. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT ENGINEER'S ACCEPTANCE FOR CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, CONCRETE SLURRY APPLICATION AREAS,WORK IN AND NEAR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, AREAS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS AS "SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN AREA", ANY WORK THAT WILL REQUIREDEWATERING, AND AS REQUESTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. SUBMIT ALL SITE MANAGEMENT PLANS TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IN WRITING. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYSFOR PROJECT ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTALS. WORK WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE IF A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN ISREQUIRED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. THERE WILL BE NO EXTRA TIME ADDED TO THE CONTRACT DUE TO THE UNTIMELYSUBMITTAL.3. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S INTENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR PLACE EROSION CONTROL BMPS BEFORE PUTTING THEM INTO ACTIVE SERVICE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENTPRACTICABLE.4. BURNING OF ANY MATERIAL IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARY.5. DO NOT DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED PRIOR TO STARTING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. IF ITBECOMES NECESSARY TO DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.PRESERVE ALL NATURAL BUFFERS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.6. ROUTE STORMWATER AROUND UNSTABILIZED AREAS OF THE SITE WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AND VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TOKEEP CHANNELS FROM ERODING AND TO PREVENT NUISANCE CONDITIONS AT THE OUTLET.7. DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION.8. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACES AND TO CAPTURESEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY REMOVAL WORK AND/OR GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIESCOMMENCE.9. ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBINGACTIVITIES BEGIN. MAINTAIN SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED.10. LOCATE PERIMETER CONTROL ON THE CONTOUR TO CAPTURE OVERLAND, LOW- VELOCITY SHEET FLOWS DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL EXPOSED SOILS AND PRIOR TODISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATERS. PLACE J-HOOKS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100 FOOT INTERVALS.11. PROVIDE PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. PLACE BMP A MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE WHERE FEASIBLE. DO NOT PLACE STOCKPILES INNATURAL BUFFER AREAS, SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES.12. FLOATING SILT CURTAIN IS ALLOWED AS PERIMETER CONTROL FOR IN WATER WORK ONLY. PLACE THE FLOATING SILT CURTAIN AS CLOSE TO SHORE AS POSSIBLE. PLACEPERIMETER CONTROL BMP ON LAND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE IN WATER WORK IS COMPLETED.13. DITCH CHECKS WILL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.AREATIME FRAMENOTES171. INITIATE STABILIZATION IMMEDIATELY WHEN CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. COMPLETE STABILIZATIONWITHIN THE TIME FRAME LISTED. IN MANY INSTANCES THIS WILL REQUIRE STABILIZATION TO OCCUR MORE THAN ONCE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CLAY OR SILT AND STOCKPILED AND CONSTRUCTED ROAD BASE ARE EXEMPT FROM THE STABILIZATIONREQUIREMENT.2. STABILIZE WETTED PERIMETER OF DITCH (I.E. WHERE THE DITCH GETS WET).3. APPLICATION OF MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER AND POLYACRYLAMIDE ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION METHODS IN THESE AREAS.4. STABILIZE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF WINTER. ANY WORK STILL BEING PERFORMED OUTSIDE OF WETLAND AREAS WILL BE SNOW MULCHED,SEEDED, AND BLANKETED WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES IN THE NPDES PERMIT.5. TOPSOIL BERMS MUST BE STABILIZED IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS. USE RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 2, 3, OR 4 AS DIRECTED BY THEPROJECT ENGINEER. THE MNDOT SEED MIX USED IN THE RAPID STABILIZATION MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: A. SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN MAY 1 - AUGUST 1, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-111 B. SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN AUGUST 1 AND OCTOBER 31, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-112 C. MULTI YEAR CONSTRUCTION 22-1116. KEEP DITCHES AND EXPOSED SOILS IN AN EVEN ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPLY EROSION CONTROL MULCHES, HYDROMULCHES ANDBLANKETS.LAST 200 LINEAL FEET OF DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALEREMAINING PORTIONS OF DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALEPIPE AND CULVERT OUTLETSEXPOSED SOILS AND STOCKPILESWITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER24 HOURS14 DAYS/7 DAYS24 HOURS14 DAYS/7 DAYSWITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO SURFACE WATER ORPROPERTY EDGE1, 2, 31, 314. PROTECT STORM SEWER INLETS AT ALL TIMES WITH THE APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR EACH SPECIFIC PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE INLETPROTECTION DEVICES WITH EMERGENCY OVERFLOW CAPABILITIES. SILT FENCE PLACED IN THE INLET GRATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE INLET PROTECTION BMPFOR GRADING OPERATIONS. SILT FENCE PLACED IN THE GRATE IS ONLY ALLOWED FOR SHORT INTERVALS DURING MILLING OR PAVING OPERATIONS. INLETPROTECTION DEVICES MAY NEED TO BE PLACED MULTIPLE TIMES IN THE SAME LOCATION OVER THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILLBE PAID FOR ONCE PER INLET REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE BMP IS PLACED. KEEP ALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION DEVICES IN GOODFUNCTIONAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. REPLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE WITH A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE IF THE PROJECT ENGINEER DEEMS AN INLETPROTECTION DEVICE TO BE NONFUNCTIONAL, IN POOR CONDITION, INEFFECTIVE, OR NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THEREWILL BE NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.15. PLACE CONSTRUCTION EXITS, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF THE PROJECT SITE.PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION EXITS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PREVENT TRACK OUT. MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION EXITS WHEN EVIDENCE OF TRACKING IS DISCOVERED.REGULAR STREET SWEEPING IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO PROPER CONSTRUCTION EXIT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE.16. DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WHENEVER FEASIBLE. IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TODISCHARGE THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, THE WATER MUST BE TREATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE A NUISANCECONDITION IN THE RECEIVING WATERS OR TO DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. CLEAN OUT ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS REGARDLESS OF WHETHERUSED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS TO THE DESIGN CAPACITY AFTER ALL UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY ISCOMPLETED.17. PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION AT ANY OUTFALL OF DEWATERING ACTIVITIES.18. PROVIDE STABILIZATION IN ANY TRENCHES CUT FOR DEWATERING OR SITE DRAINING PURPOSES.19. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER SYSTEM AT THE END OF PROJECT.20. PRESERVE A MINIMUM OF 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR (IF BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE) PROVIDE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER ISLOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF LAND DISTURBANCE AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER.COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446J:\2019\191557.01\CAD\Dwgs\Sheets\45.dwg6/24/2020 11:22:07 AMXrefs: xgt-1-dh01-bdr-full 06/22/2006/22/20 WATER RESOURCES NOTESSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (CONTINUED)REVIEW ALL PERMITS FOR ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT WILL EFFECT CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT.TEMPORARY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY WORK. THEREFORE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A PERMITFOR THE TEMPORARY APPROPRIATION OF WATERS OF THE STATE, NON-IRRIGATION FROM MNDNR WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO COMMENCING DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. ALL TEMPORARY DEWATERING SHALL BEDISCHARGED TO AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR TREATMENT PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO THE RECEIVING WATER. SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO THEPROJECT ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.TYPE OF PERMITAGENCYDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR)GROUNDWATER APPROPRIATIONSTHESE NOTES ALONG WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE ARE INTENDED TO GIVE INFORMATION ON CRITICAL DRAINAGE FEATURES,NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONTRACTOR OPERATIONS THAT MAY IMPACT DRAINAGE AND NATURAL RESOURCES.1. CHANGING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY CAUSE PROBLEMS OFF THE PROJECT AND COULD MEAN THE PROJECT IS OUT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED DRAINAGE PERMITS.2. FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION, PROVIDE AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL WHEREVER TOPSOILHAS BEEN REMOVED.3. ANY SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE TILES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR REROUTED, AND CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING TILE ORDRAINAGE SYSTEM TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING UPLAND DRAINAGE IS PERPETUATED. THIS SHOULD BE DONE TO THE APPROVAL AND SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECTENGINEER.4. THE FOLLOWING WATER RELATED PERMITS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT:COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446J:\2019\191557.01\CAD\Dwgs\Sheets\46.dwg6/24/2020 11:47:53 AMXrefs: xgt-1-dh01-bdr-full 06/22/2006/22/20 1 4 34 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE GENERAL NOTES SPECIFIC NOTES CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXCROSS HERESIDEWALK CLOSED AHEAD CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXX ENDS OCT 20XX CROSS HEREAHEADCONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXSIDEWALK CLOSED CROSS HERESIDEWALK CLOSED EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. THE MINIMUM TEMPORARY WALKWAY WIDTH SHOULD BE THE WIDTH OF THE EXISTING FACILITY. IF THE EXISTING FACILITY HAS A WIDTH OF GREATER THAN 60 IN, THE WIDTH OF THE TEMPORARY FACILITY MAY BE 60 INCHES. IF THE WIDTH OF THE DETOUR IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES, THEN A 60 INCH BY 60 INCH PASSING SPACE IS REQUIRED EVERY 200 FT. HAVE A DETECTABLE EDGE TO GUIDE THE PEDESTRIAN AROUND THE HAZARD. COULD BE A HAZARD TO A VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEDESTRIAN SHOULD ANY PORTABLE SIGN OR BARRICADE PLACED IN A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY THAT MARKING MATERIAL MAY BE USED TO FORM 36 INCH WIDE CROSSWALK BLOCKS. BLOCKS OR TWO TRANSVERSE LINES. TWO STRIPS OF 18 INCH PREFORMED TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR CROSSWALKS MAY USE CROSSWALK PUBLISHED BY OTST: 3/30/2018 (FOR MID-BLOCK CLOSURE) OTHER SIDE OF STREET DETOUR 4 5 3453 CLOSED SIDEWALK 1 TEMPORARY CURB RAMPS WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS. MAINTAIN ONE OPEN SIDEWALK AT ALL TIMES. ROUTE (APR) AT ALL TIMES. FOR ROADWAYS WITH NO AVAILABLE DETOURS, WHEN CLOSING OR RELOCATING CROSSWALKS OR SIDEWALKS, PROVIDE DETECTABLE TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND INCLUDE ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES CONSISTENT WITH TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR PEDESTRIANS ARE SHOWN. OTHER DEVICES MAY BE NECESSARY TO CONTROL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTROLLING CLOSED CROSSWALKS SHALL BE COVERED OR DEACTIVATED. THE SIDEWALK SURFACE. A 7 FOOT MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO POST MOUNTED SIGNS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE THE ROADWAY, PROVIDE AN APR DETOUR WITH TRAILBLAZING SIGNS. 3. WHERE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE AN APR ON THE OTHER SIDE OF DETOUR ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. 2. WHERE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE A SAME SIDE APR, PROVIDE A ROUTE UTILIZING BYPASSES. 1. PROVIDE THE APR ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET AS THE DISRUPTED PROVIDING AN APR IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OF PREFERENCE: MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO PEDESTRIANS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE BY STAGE WORK, AS NECESSARY, TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN LEGEND SIGN SURFACE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC DIRECTION OF WORK AREA DEVICE CHANNELIZATION PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK BARRICADE DEVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR SIGHT-IMPAIRED PEDESTRIANS. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUDIBLE MESSAGE DEVICE OR TACTILE MESSAGE DEVICE (AMD) AUDIBLE MESSAGE 2 3 4 CROSSINGS IN ORDER TO ILLUMINATE PEDESTRIANS. IF NOT ALREADY LIT, LIGHTING SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AT MID-BLOCK SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED. TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN DETOUR. THE REASON FOR THE NON-COMPLIANCE DISPLAYED IF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHOULD NOT USE THE PRIMARY BE FULLY ACCESSIBLE. THE SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SHALL NOT BE WHEN ANY WALKWAY THROUGH A WORK ZONE HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SHOULD BE DISPLAYED MILLINGS, OR OTHER UNEVEN SURFACES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS. ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS FOR THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE. GRAVEL, BITUMINOUS, STEEL, RUBBER, WOOD (3/4 INCHES OR THICKER), AND PLASTIC ARE WHEELCHAIRS, WALKERS, STROLLERS, AND OTHER MOBILITY DEVICES. CONCRETE, OR UNEVEN GROUND.THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE WILL ALLOW NORMAL USAGE OF SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A SOLID BASE TO COVER SHORT SEGMENTS OF ROUGH, SOFT, SURFACE, REGARDLESS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS. THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE APR. PROVIDE A FIRM, STABLE, FREE-DRAINING, AND NON-SLIP TEMPORARY WALKWAY PROVIDE A SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS, HARD SURFACE THROUGH THE LENGTH OF THE 5 ACCOMMODATIONS THROUGH WORK ZONES DESIGN GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. THE MESSAGE CONTENT GUIDELINES CAN BE FOUND WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS THROUGH WORK ZONES WEB-PAGE. ADDITIONALLY, A SUMMARY OF FOUND ON THE MNDOT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING WEBSITE ON THE PEDESTRIAN CAN BE FOUND IN "TPAR - AUDIBLE MESSAGE CONTENT GUIDELINES" WHICH CAN BE REPORTING HAZARDS. TYPICAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN AN AUDIBLE MESSAGE AND/OR END DATES) AND A PROJECT CONTACT NUMBER FOR 24 / 7 QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION SUCH AS THE DURATION OF THE WALKWAY RESTRICTIONS (BEGINNING TYPICAL SIGN MESSAGE FOR A TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN DETOUR SHOULD INCLUDE SIGN/BARRICADE WITH APPROPRIATE DEVICES. (BIKES, PEDESTRIANS) IS REDUCED ENOUGH TO CAUSE HAZARD, DELINEATE THE WHEN A SIGN OR BARRICADE IS ORIENTED SUCH THAT VISIBILITY TO TRAFFIC 5431 2 SIDEWALK CLOSED 6 TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE MODIFIED: JRH 1/19/2021 SIDEWALKCLOSED AHEADCONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXSIDEWALK CLOSED CROSS HERE4536 TEMPORARY CROSSWALK FOR CROSSWALK CLOSURE * * *DENOTES MODIFICATION FROM STANDARD TYPICALFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:TC01\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_tc01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 2 4 35 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE AND ATTENUATION BARRIER WITH TAPER WALKWAY SURFACE PROVIDE TEMPORARY SPECIFIC NOTES OR DRIVEWAY MINOR ROAD CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXX ENDS OCT 20XX SIDEWALK CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXWORK AHEADCONTACT 612-XXX-XXXX ENDS OCT 20XX SIDEWALK CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXSIDEWALK CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXX ENDS OCT 20XX WORK AHEAD CONTACT 612-XXX-XXXXENDS OCT 20XXSIDEWALK WORK AHEADSIDEWALK WORK AHEADWORK AHEADSIDEWALK WORK AHEAD HAVE A DETECTABLE EDGE TO GUIDE THE PEDESTRIAN AROUND THE HAZARD. COULD BE A HAZARD TO A VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEDESTRIAN SHOULD ANY PORTABLE SIGN OR BARRICADE PLACED IN A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY THAT BE FULLY ACCESSIBLE. WHEN ANY WALKWAY THROUGH A WORK ZONE HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SHOULD BE DISPLAYED MODIFIED: PUBLISHED BY OTST: 3/30/2018 1 2 1 1 RIGHT OF WAY BYPASS ON ADJACENT AVAILABLE 2 1 1 SIDEWALK BYPASS USING PARKING OR SHOULDER ON LOW SPEED ROADWAY channelizers pedestrian CHANNELIZERS PEDESTRIAN ADVANCE OF THE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK. STREET PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED FOR AT LEAST 50 FEET IN AREA WAS USED AS AN INTERMITTENT TRAFFIC LANE OR BYPASS LANE. 5 DEVICE TAPER 25 FEET LONG, RECOMMENDED WHEN THE CLOSED BYPASS TYPE A BYPASS TYPE B BYPASS TYPE C SHOULDER OR PARKING LANE SIDEWALK BYPASS USING SPEED OF 45 MPH OR LESS. NOTE: MAY ONLY BE USED ON ROADWAY WITH POSTED ROAD OR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY. REQUIRED IF CROSSING A MINOR TEMPORARY TRUNCATED DOMES, 3 7 437 43 7 437 43 7 4 CHANNELIZERS PEDESTRIAN374 HIGH SPEED ROADWAY 5 TEMPORARY CURB RAMPS WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS. THE ROADWAY, PROVIDE AN APR DETOUR WITH TRAILBLAZING SIGNS. 3. WHERE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE AN APR ON THE OTHER SIDE OF DETOUR ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. 2. WHERE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE A SAME SIDE APR, PROVIDE A ROUTE UTILIZING BYPASSES. 1. PROVIDE THE APR ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET AS THE DISRUPTED PROVIDING AN APR IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OF PREFERENCE: MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO PEDESTRIANS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE BY 6 6 6 4 3 LEGEND SIGN SURFACE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC DIRECTION OF WORK AREA DEVICE CHANNELIZATION PEDESTRIAN BARRIER SIDEWALK BARRICADE DEVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE (AMD) AUDIBLE MESSAGE 7 6 WALKWAY IS 48 INCHES. EVERY 200 FEET. THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE BY 60 INCH PASSING SPACE IS REQUIRED PROVIDED FOR THE ROUTE, THEN A 60 INCH IF A 60 INCH PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY WIDTH ISN'T DESIGNER NOTE 7 SIGHT-IMPAIRED PEDESTRIANS. TACTILE MESSAGE MAY BE PROVIDED FOR AN APPROVED AUDIBLE MESSAGE DEVICE OR GENERAL NOTES MAINTAIN ONE OPEN SIDEWALK AT ALL TIMES. ROUTE (APR) AT ALL TIMES. FOR ROADWAYS WITH NO AVAILABLE DETOURS, TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND INCLUDE ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES CONSISTENT WITH TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR PEDESTRIANS ARE SHOWN. OTHER DEVICES MAY BE NECESSARY TO CONTROL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. STAGE WORK, AS NECESSARY, TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONTROLLING CLOSED CROSSWALKS SHALL BE COVERED OR DEACTIVATED. THE SIDEWALK SURFACE. A 7 FOOT MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO POST MOUNTED SIGNS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE SIGN/BARRICADE WITH APPROPRIATE DEVICES. (BIKES, PEDESTRIANS) IS REDUCED ENOUGH TO CAUSE HAZARD, DELINEATE THE WHEN A SIGN OR BARRICADE IS ORIENTED SUCH THAT VISIBILITY TO TRAFFIC MILLINGS, OR OTHER UNEVEN SURFACES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS. ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS FOR THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE. GRAVEL, BITUMINOUS, STEEL, RUBBER, WOOD (3/4 INCHES OR THICKER), AND PLASTIC ARE WHEELCHAIRS, WALKERS, STROLLERS, AND OTHER MOBILITY DEVICES. CONCRETE, OR UNEVEN GROUND.THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE WILL ALLOW NORMAL USAGE OF SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A SOLID BASE TO COVER SHORT SEGMENTS OF ROUGH, SOFT, SURFACE, REGARDLESS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS. THE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE APR. PROVIDE A FIRM, STABLE, FREE-DRAINING, AND NON-SLIP TEMPORARY WALKWAY PROVIDE A SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS, HARD SURFACE THROUGH THE LENGTH OF THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. THE ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE (APR) WHEN CLOSING OR RELOCATING CROSSWALKS OR SIDEWALKS, PROVIDE DETECTABLE MUST REMAIN OPEN AT ALL TIMES. 5 SEE MN MUTCD FOR GUIDANCE ON PLACEMENT AND USAGE OF BARRIER. OR REPORTING HAZARDS. AND/OR END DATES) AND A PROJECT CONTACT NUMBER FOR 24 / 7 QUESTIONS INFORMATION SUCH AS THE DURATION OF THE WALKWAY RESTRICTIONS (BEGINNING TYPICAL SIGN MESSAGE FOR A TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN DETOUR SHOULD INCLUDE File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:TC02\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_tc01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 3 4 36 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE TEMPORARY CURB RAMP SPECIFIC NOTES 1 MAXIMUM 0.25 INCH LEADING EDGE 9 EDGE TREATMENT NON-SLIP SURFACE 6 8 9 5 7 5 9 4 CURB FACE DRAINAGE CLEAR SPACE EDGE TREATMENT JOINT GAP TREATMENT EDGE TREATMENT 3 7 DRAINAGE 2 ABOVE RAMP SURFACE CROSS SLOPE 2% MAX. ON ALL CURB RAMP LANDINGS WHERE THE WALKWAY CHANGES DIRECTION (TURNS). 4 CURB RAMPS AND LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. 7 WATER FLOW IN THE GUTTER SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE IMPEDED. PARALLEL TO CURB 0.5 INCH MAXIMUM EDGE TREATMENT 12 1 TEMPORARY CURB RAMP SHOWN WITH SIDE APRON 6 1 12 1 12 CLEAR SPACE5 NON-SLIP SURFACE EDGE TREATMENT9 6 DRAINAGE7 CURB FACE CLEAR SPACE5 JOINT GAP TREATMENT8 EDGE TREATMENT9 DRAINAGE7 EDGE TREATMENT9 ABOVE RAMP SURFACE 2 2 6 1 3 SHOWN WITH PROTECTIVE EDGE 8 LATERAL JOINTS OR GAPS BETWEEN SURFACES SHALL BE LESS THAN 1/2 INCH WIDE. 2 1 1 2 INCH TO 4 INCH WIDE EDGE MARKING 48 INCH X 48 INCH MIN. LANDING AREA 6 INCH MIN. HEIGHT DETECTABLE EDGING PROTECTIVE EDGING 2 INCH MIN. HEIGHT PROTECTIVE EDGING 2 INCH MIN. HEIGHT 2 INCH TO 4 INCH WIDE EDGE MARKING HEIGHT ABOVE RAMP SURFACE PROTECTIVE EDGING 2 INCH MIN. 1 CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 48 INCHES MIN. WIDTH WITH A FIRM, STABLE AND SLIP RESISTANT SURFACE. 2 PROTECTIVE EDGING WITH A 2 INCH MIN. HEIGHT SHALL BE PLACED WHEN A CURB RAMP APRON SLOPE STEEPER THAN 1:3. PROTECTIVE EDGING SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WHEN CURB RAMPS OR LANDING PLATFORMS HAVE A VERTICAL DROP OF 3 INCHES OR MORE. OR LANDING PLATFORM HAS A VERTICAL DROP OF 6 INCHES OR GREATER OR HAS A SIDE 3 DETECTABLE EDGING WITH 6 INCH MIN. HEIGHT AND CONTRASTING COLOR SHALL BE PLACED 5 CLEAR SPACE OF 48 INCH X 48 INCH MIN. SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND BELOW THE CURB RAMP. 6 THE CURB RAMP WALKWAY EDGE SHALL BE MARKED WITH A CONTRASTING COLOR, 2 INCH TO 4 INCH WIDE MARKING. THE MARKING IS OPTIONAL WHERE COLOR CONTRASTING EDGING IS USED. 9 CHANGES BETWEEN SURFACE HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2 INCH. LATERAL EDGES SHOULD BE VERTICAL UP TO 1/4 INCH HIGH, AND BEVELED AT 1:2 BETWEEN 1/4 INCH AND 1/2 INCH HEIGHT. PERPENDICULAR TO CURB MODIFIED: PUBLISHED BY OTST: 3/30/2018File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:TC03\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_tc01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 4 4 37 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE HANDRAILING EDGE DETECTABLE EDGE WALKWAY SURFACE OF 6 INCHES HIGH ABOVE THE CONTINUOUS AND A MINIMUM DETECTABLE EDGE SHALL BE SURFACE TEMPORARY WALKWAY CLOSED SIDEWALK 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE 2 INCH MAXIMUM CHANNELIZER PEDESTRIAN NOTE: DETECTABLE EDGE FRAMED IMMEDIATELY BELOW OVERHANG 5 FEET DESIRABLE 4 FEET MINIMUM 12 1 0.5 INCHES MAX. 0.25 INCHES MAX. GENERAL NOTES SPECIFIC NOTES MODIFIED: PUBLISHED BY OTST: 3/30/2018 3 4 3 2 6 7 2 3 WALKWAY SURFACE SIDEWALK BARRICADE DEVICE LOCATION WHEN USED TYPICAL AUDIBLE MESSAGE 5 2 7 1 1 ON PORTABLE STAND DETECTABLE EDGE FOR SIGN 9 3 2 32 INCH MIN. 2 INCH MAX. 2 INCHES MAX. 32 INCHES MIN. 7 34 INCHES MIN. 2 INCHES MAX. PEDESTRIAN CHANNELIZER USING A BARRIER WITH PEDESTRIAN CHANNELIZERS TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE PEDESTRIAN CHANNELIZER LEADING EDGE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FROM THE WALKWAY SURFACE UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 2 INCHES IS ALLOWED FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. DEVICES SHALL NOT BLOCK WATER DRAINAGE FROM THE WALKWAY. A GAP HEIGHT OR OPENING ROUNDED TO PREVENT HARM TO HANDS, ARMS OR CLOTHING OF PEDESTRIANS. ALL DEVICES SHALL BE FREE OF SHARP OR ROUGH EDGES, AND FASTENERS (BOLTS) SHALL BE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 INCHES IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE WALKWAY SURFACE. THE DEVICE SHALL NOT EXTEND INTO THE 48 INCH MINIMUM WALKWAY CLEAR SPACE AND BE LOCATED BEHIND OR INTERNAL TO THE DEVICE. ANY SUPPORT ON THE FRONT OF ANY TRIPPING HAZARD IN THE WALKWAY NEEDS A DETECTABLE EDGE. BALLAST SHALL - BE SUPPORTED WITH MINIMAL INTERFERENCE TO THE PEDESTRIAN'S HANDS OR FINGERS. - BE CONTINUOUS AT A HEIGHT OF 34 TO 38 INCHES ABOVE THE WALKWAY SURFACE, AND - BE IN A VERTICAL PLANE PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALKWAY ABOVE THE DETECTABLE EDGE, WHEN HAND GUIDANCE IS REQUIRED, THE TOP RAIL OR TOP SURFACE SHALL: LONGITUDINAL CHANNELIZING DEVICES FOR PEDESTRIANS SHALL BE 32 INCHES HIGH OR GREATER. STABILITY OF THE DETECTABLE EDGE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED. AN EDGE OF THE FRAMING MAY BE REMOVED IF IT IS NOT NEEDED FOR PED GUIDANCE. "EDGE-TREATMENT DETAIL" ON THE TPAR RAMP SHEET. SURFACE VERTICAL DISCONTINUITIES SHOULD NOT EXCEED 0.25 INCHES, IF IT DOES SEE POSES A HAZARD TO A VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEDESTRIAN. AROUND A PORTABLE SIGN STAND SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE WALKWAY AREA IN WHICH THE SIGN AND HAVE COLOR MARKINGS CONTRASTING WITH THE WALKWAY SURFACE. THE DETECTABLE EDGE DETECTABLE EDGES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND 6 INCHES MIN. HIGH ABOVE WALKWAY SURFACE ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS. A TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACE. GRAVEL, MILLINGS, OR OTHER UNEVEN SURFACES ARE NOT RUBBER, WOOD (3/4 INCHES OR THICKER), AND PLASTIC ARE ACCEPTABLE SURFACE MATERIALS FOR OF WHEELCHAIRS, WALKERS, STROLLERS, OR OTHER MOBILITY DEVICES. CONCRETE, BITUMINOUS, STEEL, REGARDLESS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS. TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACES SHALL ALLOW NORMAL USAGE TEMPORARY WALKWAY SURFACES SHALL PROVIDE A FIRM, STABLE, FREE-DRAINING AND NON-SLIP ALLOW PEDESTRIANS TO STRAY FROM THE CHANNELIZED PATH. ALL DEVICES USED TO CHANNELIZE PEDESTRIAN FLOW SHOULD INTERLOCK SUCH THAT GAPS DO NOT SIDEWALK BARRICADES SHALL BE PLACED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE WALKWAY SURFACE. SHALL MEET CRASHWORTHY REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATE FOR THE BARRIER APPLICATION. ANY PEDESTRIAN DEVICES USED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE PROTECTION FOR PEDESTRIANS OR WORKERS WHEN LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 27 INCHES ABOVE THE WALKWAY SURFACE. RAILINGS OR OTHER OBJECTS MAY PROTRUDE A MAXIMUM OF 4 INCHES INTO THE WALKWAY CLEAR SPACE File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:TC04\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_tc01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 38 11 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS STARTING WORK PRIOR TO LIMIT SPEED POSTED (MPH) 0 - 30 35 - 40 (G) DEVICES CHANNELIZING OF SPACING FEET 25 (A) SIGNS WARNING ADVANCE OF SPACING FEET 100 325 FEET 700 DISTANCE SIGHT DECISION 550 (L) LENGTH TAPER FEET 325 200 FEET 200 (B) SPACE BUFFER 305 AAB4GWORK AHEAD ROAD **APREPARED BE TO STOP *G*AABWORKAHEADROAD*APREPAREDBETO STOP* *SEE NOTE 3NOT TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN THREE CALENDAR DAYSL/2L/2BARRICADE OR VERTICAL PANEL. DRUMS, TYPE I OR TYPE II - PORTABLE FLOOD LIGHT SPEED LIMIT IS 40 MPH OR LESS. SIGNS MAY BE OMITTED IF THE POSTED 3. THE FLAGGERS AND FLAGGER AHEAD THE DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE. THE FLAGGER SHALL BE AT LEAST 2. THE APPROACH SIGHT DISTANCE TO A 8 FT. OFFSET. 1. TAPER LENGTH (L) IS BASED ON NOTES: - FLAGGER OPTIONALOPTIONAL AND THE WORK SPACE WITH PORTABLE LIGHTS. 5. DURING NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS, ILLUMINATE BOTH THE FLAGGERS SURFACE AVAILABLE TO PASS THE WORK SPACE. 4. - REQUIRED IF THERE IS LESS THAN 10 FT. OF PAVED WORK AREA AND TAPERS. 3. PARKING AND STOPPING MAY BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE OF THE SHOULDER SHALL BE 10 FT. DEVICES TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR OUTSIDE EDGE 2. MINIMUM PAVED LANE WIDTH FROM THE CHANNELIZING AND REMOVE CHART WHENEVER PRACTICAL. 1. INSERT SPACING CHART DISTANCES INTO LAYOUTS INSERTING IN PLAN): DESIGNER NOTES (REMOVE FROM LAYOUT BEFORE THREE LANE TWO WAY ROAD 40 MPH OR LESS WORK SPACE IN CENTER OF ROADFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:TC05\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_tc01.dgn1/19/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 DDDFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:STP04\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_stp01.dgn1/15/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 0 1 2 C-3C-2 FEET500 FEET500{ HAMLINE WYNCREST COURT1C-11C-1X4-2X4-2HAMLINE AVE.C-2C-312' TURN LANE 12' LANE 12' LANE 4' SHOULDER 4' SHOULDER IN (WR) (BY OTHERS) CROSSWALK EPOXY GROUND STA 0+58.49 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) BEGIN SAP 062-650-014 1 3 39 20 SCALE IN FEET PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS SIGNING & PERMANENT 1 MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) WITH 3' GAP. BLOCKS SHALL BE 1. CROSSWALK BLOCKS SHALL BE 2.5' X 8' GENERAL NOTES: PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PLACE 500 FEET BEYOND NOTES: DDDFile:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:STP05\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_stp01.dgn1/15/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 13 14 FEET500 FEET50011{ HAMLINE HAMLINE AVERTE 37 TRAILFLORAL PARK TRAILC-1C-1X4-2X4-212' LANE 12' LANE 12' TURN LANE 4' SHOULDER 4' SHOULDER IN (WR) (BY OTHERS) CROSSWALK EPOXY GROUND BEACON ASSEMBLY (COMPLETE) No. 1: SOLAR POWERED FLASHING BEACON ASSEMBLY (COMPLETE) No. 2: SOLAR POWERED FLASHING 2 2 STA 13+79.68 HAMLINE AVE (CSAH 50) END SAP 062-650-014 20 SCALE IN FEET 40 32 PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS SIGNING & PERMANENT 1 MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) WITH 3' GAP. BLOCKS SHALL BE 1. CROSSWALK BLOCKS SHALL BE 2.5' X 8' GENERAL NOTES: SEE DETAIL ON SHEET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PLACE 500 FEET BEYOND NOTES: 412 File:PlotDrvr:pdf_bw_no_level_MnDOT.pltcfgModel:STP06\\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\181582\CAD\Road_Design\sheets\CD181582_stp01.dgn1/15/2021Last Saved:PenTbl:hrg.tblSHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MJM MJM JRH BAJ 41 52241 1/19/20211815821/19/2021 JORDAN R HOREJSITYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF ARDEN HILLS (CSAH 50) HAMLINE AVE SAP 062-650-014 PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS SIGNING & PERMANENT LIGHTS WARNING TURN ON BUTTON TO PUSH LIGHTS WARNING TURN ON BUTTON TO PUSH 1 PEDESTRIAN PEDESTAL INSTALLATION (TWO SIDED) TYPICAL RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON SYSTEM 24" DIA CLAMP GROUND ROD GROUT WITH WEEP HOLE. INSTALL RODENT GUARD OR NON-SHRINK SHAPE TOP 11 INCHES WITH FORMS. 2" PEDESTAL FOOTING 2 2 1 ENERGY SOURCE SOLAR PANEL PEDESTRIAN PUSH-BUTTON) (INCLUDED IN THE COST OF SEE MUTCD, 2009 EDITION PUSH-BUTTON SIGN R10-25 PEDESTRIAN 9" X 12" MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS) CONTROLLER (INSTALLED PER POLE-MOUNT RADIO NETWORK SIGN (2 EACH) PEDESTRIAN CROSSING YELLOW 36" X 36" W11-2 PUSH-BUTTON PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL POST GALVANIZED STEEL (SEE DETAIL TO LEFT) POLE FOOTING SIDEWALKSIDEWALK/PATH/RAMP FROM EDGE OF 10" MAX 3'-6"CURB AND GUTTER EDGE OF PAVEMENT) AND GUTTER, 4' MIN FROM (AT LOCATIONS WITHOUT CURB 4' MIN FROM FACE OF CURB (SOLAR-POWERED FLASHING BEACON ASSEMBLY (COMPLETE)) PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW MATERIAL EXPANSION GRADE PAVEMENT FINISHED WIRE DUCT 1" GROUND 5'-0"MIN24"1 RIGHT ARROW EACH 1 LEFT ARROW AND ARROW PLAQUE FLOURESCENT YELLOW GREEN 12" X 24" W16-7P SUPPLEMENTAL LENSES WITH AMBER LED'S RAPID FLASHING BAR CLEAR DOUBLE SIDED ANCHOR BOLTS (FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE USE) 2" CONDUIT STUB-OUT GROUND ROD 41 3 3 Page 1 of 2 DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen (EIT), Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Design of the Mounds View High School Trail project Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $0 $85,810 PIR Fund Council Should Consider The City Council is requested to consider approval of a professional services agreement with SRF consultants in the amount of $85,810 for design of the Mounds View High School Trail project extending from County Road E2 to Mounds View High School. The City Council should also consider authorizing the Finance Director to complete all corresponding budget adjustments. Background/Discussion City staff was directed to solicit engineering design proposals to prepare project construction plans for the Mounds View High School Trail project. The proposed project would involve construction of two trail segments.  Segment 1 along the west side of Snelling Avenue North (CSAH 76) from the intersection of County Road E2 (CSAH 73) to Lake Valentine Road  Segment 2 along Lake Valentine Road from Snelling Avenue North (CSAH 76) to the south parking lot at Mounds View High School. A Request for Proposals was issued on December 17, 2020. The scope of work for the project includes preparation of an alternatives analysis to determine a recommended trail alignment, preparation of construction plans, coordination with Ramsey County, and preparation of legal descriptions for easements needed to construct the project. The scope of work does not include the preparation of specifications, final permitting, bidding assistance or construction administration. These tasks can be provided after the City secures sufficient funding to build the project. CONSENT ITEM – 6E MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Proposals were requested from three consulting firms: SRF, Kimley Horn and Bolton & Menk. All three firms responded to the Request for Proposals, are all well qualified to perform the work, and proposed an experienced team to complete the project. The proposal from SRF included a more thorough description for their project approach and mentioned innovative concepts regarding the potential to narrow the roadway and potentially reduce construction costs. SRF also provided the lowest proposed fee, although City staff does not recommend that the City select design consultants based on fees. Copies of the proposals are provided in Attachment A. A summary of the scoring results is provided in Attachment B If the City Council wishes to proceed with the design phase to allow the project to be considered shovel-ready for potential future funding opportunities, then staff recommends approving the attached professional services agreement with SRF as provided in Attachment C. City staff has concluded that SRF is capable of successfully completing the project based on their history with similar projects with Minneapolis, St. Paul and Three Rivers Park District. Budget Impact A preliminary estimate of the total project cost for the Mounds View High School Trail project is provided below. Project funding would be derived from the City’s PIR fund and trail grant funding to be secured in the future. Project Construction: $ 1,235,000 Easement Acquisition: $ 125,000 Environmental Permitting: $ 20,000 Engineering Design: $ 90,000 Construction Management/Testing: $ 135,000 Construction Contingency: $ 40,000 City Administration/Legal: $ 55,000 Total $ 1,700,000 Attachments Attachment A: MVHS Trail Proposals Attachment B: Proposal Scores Attachment C: Proposed Professional Service Agreement with SRF MOUNDS VIEW High School Trail Improvements CITY OF ARDEN HILLS In Partnership With Northern Technologies Inc. Attachment A 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763.475.0010 www.srfconsulting.com Marketing or promotional statements about SRF’s professional services are provided solely for general information and not as a contract commitment. Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer January 11, 2021 Todd Blomstrom City Engineer City of Arden Hills 1245 Hwy 96 W Arden Hills, MN 55112 Subject: Proposal For Mounds View High School Trail Improvements (PW-21-0105) Dear Todd Blomstrom and Members of the Selection Committee: Over the last decade the City of Arden Hills has made significant investment into the development of its community trail network with the intent of a making the City a safer and more enjoyable place to walk and bicycle. The extension of the trails along Snelling Avenue and Lake Valentine Road to connect to Mounds View High School is the latest project to further this effort. This is a challenging project with many traffic, design, utility and stakeholder issues to work through and requires a strong technical team with enthusiasm and a passion for trail projects. SRF Consulting Group is excited to take on this challenge and partner with the County, local stakeholders, and residents of Arden Hills to develop a safe, aesthetically-pleasing, and pedestrian-friendly trail connection to Mounds View High School. We believe our team can deliver outstanding results and an exceptional working experience that satisfies the technical needs, schedule requirements, and management chal- lenges generated by this highly visible project. Our strengths include: • Design Expertise. This project presents a variety of design and program challenges, including the potential to reduce pavement with alternative roadway lane configurations, slope and alignment challenges, and Watershed District/County coordination. The SRF team brings exceptional experience in regional trail design, with over 60 years of collective experience on dozens of complex trail projects within Twin Cities and the greater region. We will bring our creativity and technical experience to successfully address project constraints and opportunities. • Experienced Project Leaders. Mike McGarvey will lead the overall management of this project. He is highly regarded for managing proj- ects that foster an open and collaborative design process with multi-stakeholder projects and is currently managing the Bruce Vento trail for Ramsey County, which is a similar project near Bald Eagle Lake and White Bear Lake High School. Mike will be supported by Stewart Crosby, and Steve Prusak. Stewart, an expert in trail planning and former TRPD planner, will lead the evaluation of trail alternatives and the preferred alignment. Steve will lead the technical design and development of the preferred trail design. Mike, Stewart, and Steve will leverage their combination of management and design and technical proficiency to efficiently advance the needs of the project and ensure Arden Hills receives the best leadership and expertise throughout the project. • Creative and Collaborative Process. Engaging stakeholders will be critical to the success of this project. SRF will work closely with the City’s Project Manager to build upon previous public engagement efforts and to integrate the concerns of multiple agencies, residents, and the larger community into the design. Our work plan includes several cost-effective engagement strategies and tools that we can uti- lize to foster an open process and build project consensus among residents and the community. Collaborative design discussions with City staff are important for quality results. Outside the box thinking may result in alternatives that minimize the need for additional easements. • Sustainable Solutions. One of the key goals is to have the trail lay lightly upon the natural features so that it blends into the natural sur- roundings while enhancing the user experience. Our preliminary evaluation suggests that there are opportunities to reduce impervious surfaces and related stormwater management elements. We will also work to ensure that the design is constructible and that materials will be of high quality to minimize ongoing maintenance. Our preliminary evaluation suggests that there are opportunities to reduce impervi- ous surfaces and related stormwater management elements. We are confident the SRF team will bring immediate value to the City of Arden Hills and stakeholders by completing the project in a compre- hensive and professional manner. We can also help the City strategize an implementation and funding strategy for this project through its plan- ning and grant writing staff. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss the project in greater detail and to showcase our enthusiasm for this unique and challenging project. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact Mike McGarvey at 763.475.0010 or mmcgarvey@srfconsulting.com. Sincerely, Michael McGarvey, PLA, ASLA Matt Pacyna, PE Project Principal Principal SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 1 Over the last decade the City of Arden Hills has been steadily expanding it’s trail system to better serve the residents of the community with safe and efficient travel by bikes and pedes- trians. This project to develop a trail connection to Mounds View High School is the next step in the realization of the City’s vision. The preferred approach is to construct an 8-10 foot trail along the south side of Lake Valentine Road and west side of Snelling Avenue. The City’s concept plans show a trail gen- erally at back of curb or with a small boulevard. While this design appears pretty straight forward there are a number of details that need to be resolved that can impact final design. Some specific items include adjacent grades, driveways and utilities and the need for stormwater management particu- larly along the Snelling Avenue segment. Based on initial brainstorming sessions on how the proj- ect could be implemented, SRF staff have considered several alternatives to the design that could reduce the overall cost and right of way impacts with minimal impacts to traffic operations. Design alternatives such as conversion of Snelling Avenue to a 3-lane section could reduce added impervious area, wetland impacts, and the numbers of easements required by the project. Through this project the City and SRF will define a process for selecting a preferred trail alignment and then advance the design process to move the project forward through final design, including County coordination, easement, right-of- entry, and/or right-of-way acquisition and watershed permit- ting. Some of the key objectives of this project include: • Preparing final plans to improve opportunities for future grant requests. • To obtain meaningful input from stakeholders living near the project corridor through highly interactive and engag- ing public involvement activities. • A high-quality trail facility that provides safe access to area schools, parks and recreational amenities for people of all ages and abilities. • To provide a trail facility that complements the area’s nat- ural resources and incorporates sustainable and resilient design. SRF has visited the site and spoken with project stakeholders to get a more complete understanding of the challenges of this project. This will allow the SRF team to quickly iden- tify impacts and get to a solid cost estimate early in the process. We have outlined a few of the key challenges and our approach to resolving them in the column to the right. KEY CHALLENGES PROJECT CHALLENGE – ROW, Terrain & Slope Challenges While the initial study has developed a preferred trail align- ment, there continues to be some feasibility elements that need to be addressed due to physical corridor conditions. We will look at the topog- raphy, constructibility, traffic, safety, right of way, and other corridor con- straints and their potential design solutions. We will utilize our 3D-design tools to efficiently look at cross-section, horizontal and vertical alignment options. Usually, there are constructibility, safety, cost, and/or traffic type trade-offs that are balanced with these investigations. We believe that there are benefits to making minor changes to the adjacent roadways to minimize right of way needs and reduce impervious surfaces. PROJECT CHALLENGE – Right of Way Obstructions (Utilities, Parking, Driveways, etc) When developing trails in road right of ways, one of the biggest challenges is the potential for obstructions such as utilities, driveways and landscape elements. SRF’s trail designers are adept at identifying these challenges and assessing potential resolutions. To resolve this challenge SRF will do comprehensive site reviews, in addi- tion to the site surveys, to get a solid understanding of the context of the obstructions and how the impact of the trail can be addressed in a cost-effective manner. Steep driveways adjacent, and ADA accessibility of the trail are a particular challenge with this project. Infraworks modeling software can be used to rapidly vet alternatives and produce visualiza- tions for public engagement and buy-in. Dependent on the situation, res- olution of the obstruction could include trail adjustment, utility relocation, access consolidation/relocation/closure and others. Years of experience in trail design means there are few situations that SRF has not dealt with. PROJECT CHALLENGE – Stakeholder Engagement Through respectful conversations with residents, City staff and stakeholder agencies we can better understand the needs of the community and respond with creative, constructible solu- tions that will help to ensure successes for the proposed trail. SRF is prepared with a full spectrum of in-person and online engage- ment tools to be tailored to this important project. We recommend one community meeting (virtual or in-person) and one project survey during design. We also recommend a social media campaign in addi- tion to website content. Additional tools that could be included as val- ue-added services include: • Field walk • Meeting Facilitation • Focus Groups (students, resi- dents, bike/ped advocate) Project Understanding & Approach SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 2 Scope of Services TASK 1 - PROJECT COORDINATION SRF Project Manager will hold a kickoff meeting, conduct bi-weekly telephone check-in meetings with City staff and review available project related information and record plans. The SRF Project Manager will regularly review project budget and schedule to ensure overall concurrence with the project objectives and in order to meet established milestones. SRF will maintain quality controls with independent quality checks per the SRF Quality Management Plan. SRF will coordinate efforts with other agency stakeholders including the following: • Attend/participate in up to two Arden Hills City Council meetings. • Attend/participate in up to two coordination meetings with Ram- sey County. Additional detail noted in Task 8. • Attend/participate in up to two coordination meetings with the Rice Creek Watershed District. TASK 2 - PROJECT SURVEY SRF will conduct a topographic and property survey of the project corridor to collect elevations and locations of surface/subsurface features, per standards identified in the RFP. SRF will locate property corners, reference area plats and prepare a base ROW map of the project area for use in preparing construction plans. Existing utilities along the corridor will be identified by gopher state one call and drafted into a base map for use in the plans. A utility coordination meeting will be held during design to engage the facility owners, discuss schedule and request relocations as required. Impacted owners will be invited to the preconstruction meeting for followup. TASK 3 - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION & SECURING REQUIRED EASEMENTS SRF will coordinate a geotechnical investigation for the project site and have a geotechnical recommendation memorandum with bor- ing logs prepared. This work will be completed by our subconsultant Northern Technologies Incorporated (NTI). TASK 4 - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Critical to the success of a trail project like this is clear and transpar- ent communication with the affected public. SRF will follow a clear and organized process for public engagement. The plan will include an online property owner survey form to be distributed to adjacent residents. SRF will also conduct a public informational meeting with adjacent property owners. Given current restrictions on public gath- erings this meeting is likely to be virtual, however, if weather and health restrictions allow the meeting would ideally be held outside along the corridor. Regardless of the meeting format, the SRF Public Engagement Team (PET) has a wide variety of tools and activities to make the public engagement process inclusive, engaging and effective in generat- ing public input and finding opportunities to reduce potential costs. TASK 5 - ALTERNATIVES REVIEW SRF will review and evaluate alternatives and approximate costs for the trail alignment based on site conditions along the project corri- dor. Alternatives that may be considered would be changes to the roadway lane configuration of Snelling Avenue and Lake Valentine Road to minimize property impacts and easement needs. SRF will review alternatives in a meeting with City staff to determine the pre- ferred trail alignment and get City concurrence prior to proceeding with detailed design efforts. SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 3 TASK 6 - CONSTRUCTION PLANS (INCLUDING PERMITTING) SRF will prepare construction plans for the selected alternative, based on State Aid, MN Bicycle Facility Design Manual and other accepted design standards. The plan set shall include, but is not limited to, the following sheets: • Title Sheet • Statement of Estimated Quantities and Cost Participation • Construction Notes, Standard Plates, and ADA Compliance • Typical Sections • Removal Sheets • Plan and Profile Sheets for Trail, Drainage and Retaining Walls • Pavement and Curb Restoration Sheets • Grading Plan • Erosion Control Sheets • SWPPP Sheets • Cross Sections A refined concept layout and estimate will be submitted for review by the City at 30% and plans by both the City and County at 60% and 90%. 100% plans will be provided to the City and County for final approval. Project specifications and project manual bidding support and con- struction admin will not be provided at this time, but can be amended in to the project at a later date as project funding and construction timeframe become more clearly defined. SRF will provide three paper copies and a pdf digital copy of final plans. SRF will delineate corridor wetlands and prepare a report to commence project permitting with the rice creek watershed district (RWCD). Permit applications will be completed and submitted for initial review but not fully approved until construction is imminent. Wetlands are anticipated to be impacted but mitigation is unlikely. TASK 7 - EASEMENT DOCUMENTS SRF will prepare a right-of-way boundary map for Ramsey County and easement drawings and legal descriptions for up to 19 individ- ual parcels along the corridor requiring permanent and temporary easements necessary for installation and long term maintenance of the proposed improvements. Through the design process, we will look to reduce or eliminate the need for any easement or right-of way impacts. Acquisitions will be completed by the City. TASK 8 – COUNTY COORDINATION SRF will prepare a cost participation summary tabulation spread- sheet and project location map as exhibits to assist City and County staff in the development of a cooperative agreement for the seg- ment of trail along Snelling Ave. SRF designed trail along CSAH 112 and Long Lake in Long Lake, MN SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 4 Project Team KEY PERSONNEL SRF has assembled a highly qualified and experienced team to address the needs of the Mounds View High School Trail project. Not only does the SRF team have experience working on similar trail projects, but also has strong familiarity with this area – we will use this knowledge to more efficiently collaborate with Ramsey County, the Project Management Team, and the many involved stakeholders. Team Organization SRF will be responsible for all project management and oversight activities. We will work closely with the Arden Hills project management staff to develop the processes, products, and milestones that will guide the project through completion. We understand that stakeholder engagement is important and we’ve selected a team who understands that integrating many viewpoints into the planning process will determine the best outcome for the project. We are committed to working collaboratively with project stakeholders, RCWD and Ramsey County. Our team is led by Project Manager Mike McGarvey. Mike is highly regarded for his regional trail design experience and is a member of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals. Mike will be supported by Stewart Crosby and Steven Prusak. Stewart has led planning for over 15 regional trails. Steve has extensive experience working on a variety of municipal and trail projects. Stewart and Steve will combine their passions and skills, leveraging experience of both disciplines throughout the project process. This holistic approach – of including a technical and design lead – will allow us to more efficiently progress the needs of the project and ensure that Arden Hills is getting the very best leadership and expertise throughout the project. SRF Project Manager Michael McGarvey, PLA, ASLA, LEED AP Design Lead Steven Prusak, PE Project Stakeholders • Ramsey County • City of Arden Hills • Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) • Residents & high school students City of Arden Hills Project Manager Water Resources David Filipiak, PE Public Engagement Dan McNiel Traffi c Brent Clark, PE Trail Design Steven Prusak, PE Stewart Crosby, PLA, ASLA Wetlands Nicole Zappetillo Structural Casey Black, PE Right of Way Ken Helvey Alternatives Evaluation Lead Stewart Crosby, PLA,ASLA Geotechnical Services Northern Technologies, Inc. Survey Dean Dusheck, LS The SRF team brings a rich portfolio of local and regional projects, including lakefront trails — this experience will greatly assist in successfully delivering this trail project. SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 5 MIKE MCGARVEY, PLA, ASLA | PROJECT MANAGER Mike has 25 years of experience in all aspects of landscape architecture, planning and urban design. His areas of expertise include trail planning and design, park planning and design, streetscape design, site design, and project management. Mike’s creative and innovative planning and design solutions acknowledge the influence of opera- tions and address maintenance concerns. As one of the first LEED accredited landscape architects in Minnesota, Mike ensures that sustainability is incorporated into SRF projects. Project Experience Three River Park District Dakota Rail Trail, Hennepin County and Carver County, Minnesota. Mike led the planning efforts for the 28-mile Dakota Rail Trail. He subsequently managed the design of four phases of design and construction for segments of the trail, which included extensive public involvement, abbreviated design schedules due to ARRA funding, and the design of several pedestrian bridges. Street Design Manual, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Mike was part of a multidisciplinary team that worked cooperatively with Saint Paul Planning and Public Works to develop a street design manual for the entire City. The manual is a standard practice tool for the design of complete streets illustrating best practices and design issues for all modes of transportation. North Cedar Lake Trail, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Mike led the planning and design of this heavily used rails-to-trails trail. Key elements of the trail include extensive public involvement, a Federal Aid design process, a pedestrian bridge over Minnehaha Creek, and coordination with the BNSF Railroad, which operates the freight rail that runs adjacent a significant portion of the trail. Lake Wobegon Regional Trails Phase I - III, Stearns County, Minnesota. Mike has been working on the development of the Wobegon Trail for more than 15 years. He led the planning efforts for the original Wobegon Trail Master Plan and has led the design of the first three phases of trail. Lake Wobegon Trail Extension, Stearns County, Minnesota. Mike managed the planning and preliminary design efforts for the extension of the Lake Wobegon Trail into St. Cloud. Midtown Greenway / Kenilworth Trail, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mike led the planning and design elements of this heavily used rails-to- trails trail in Minneapolis. Key elements of the trail include extensive public involvement, repurposing existing rail bridges for trail use, and coordination with the Twin City and Western Railroad, which operates the freight rail adjacent the trail. STEWART CROSBY, PLA, ASLA | ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION LEAD Stewart has 15 years of experience in landscape architecture and urban design, including park and trail master planning, conceptual design, design development, construction document preparation, and construction admin- istration. He brings innovative design solutions to a variety of projects and is frequently involved in all phases of project implementation from early planning efforts until the grand opening. Stewart excels at managing park plan- ning and design projects, while fostering an open, collaborative design process that includes agencies, residents, design professionals, and other interested stakeholders. Project Experience Dakota Rail Regional Trail, Three Rivers Park District, Minnesota. Stewart was a primary author for the Dakota Rail Regional Trail Master Plan and was actively involved in all public open houses and in individual landowner meetings held in communities along the trail corridor. He assisted in the design development for the trail with a focus on amenities such as trail heads, rest stops, and rain gardens. During construc- tion, Stewart served as both project engineer and as construction administrator. Bottineau Community Works Infrastructure Advanced Planning, Twin Cities, Minnesota. Stewart worked to advance the planning and design of desired pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure enhancements to facilitate the safe, comfortable, and convenient access to and from the planned stations. This design involved researching the feasibility of shared mobility features to supplement the pedestrian and bicycle facilities being proposed for the corridor. Shared mobility features, such as bike sharing, allow for increased use of new bicycle facilities, while others will support alternative approaches for transit users to make first and last mile connections. Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, Carver County Parks, Minnesota. Project Manager for the design and construction of the two phases of trail development that included a prefabricated trail bridge over a creek in the historic City of Carver and a trailhead with a parking lot and a trail system kiosk. Stewart also managed the MnDOT Delegated Contract Process (DCP) for Local Agency Federal Aid Projects since this project utilized federal funds. Completed 21 master plans for local and regional trails Design/Management role in the development of 39 park and trail master plans Designed 13 trails to meet local and federal funding requirements Management role in 40+ parks and trail projects Design leadership in 20+ park and site development projects SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 6 STEVEN PRUSAK, PE | DESIGN LEAD Steve has 16 years of experience as a member of design and construction teams for a variety of municipal, trail, and highway projects. His duties have included quantity calculation and project cost estimation, intersection design and details, alignments, profiles, utility design and coordination, corridor and terrain modeling, and construction management. Steve has designed and delivered projects in both AutoCAD Civil 3d and MicroStation platforms. Highlighted Project Experience Three Rivers Park District, Crystal Lake Regional Trail, Robbinsdale, Minnesota. A 2.5-mile bituminous trail was added through a challeng- ing urban environment to enhance multimodal transportation opportunities in a developing corridor and provide connectivity to existing trail networks in Minneapolis. Steve served as the civil design lead and construction manager. Bottineau Community Works Infrastructure Advanced Planning, Twin Cities, Minnesota. Steve worked to advance the planning and design of desired pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure enhancements. His involvement included researching the feasibility of shared mobility features, incorporate shared mobility features, such as bike sharing, to allow for increased use of new bicycle facilities, and support alternative approaches for transit users to make first and last mile connections that will result in better access and use of the METRO Blue Line Extension. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Ridgway Parkway Improvements, Minneapolis, Minnesota. A one-mile concrete walk was replaced with bituminous trail, a loop parking area was reconstructed, and a tiered scenic overlook was added to complete a “missing link” in the Minneapolis Parks trail network. Steve served as the civil design lead and construction manager. Other Trail Experience Three Rivers Park District, Dakota Rail Trail and St Bonifacius Extension, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Member of Civil Design Team City of Plymouth Parks, Northwest Greenway Trail Phase II, Plymouth, Minnesota. Member of Civil Design Team City of Plymouth Parks, Northwest Greenway Trail Phase III, Plymouth, Minnesota. Civil Design Lead. 20+ Significant Utility Coordination Projects 34 Miles of Trail Design & Planning NICOLE ZAPPETILLO | WETLANDS Nicole has 11 years of environmental science experience including numerous wetland delin- eations, wetland permitting, agency coordina- tion, and environmental documentation for pub- lic and private projects. Her work at SRF includes completing wetland delineations and reports, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers Section 404 permit applications, agency coordination, and federal and state environmental documents. Project Experience Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail, Victoria and Chanhassen, Min- nesota. Completed a field wetland delineation, delineation reports, and agency coordination for a proposed segment of regional multi- use trail, including bituminous and boardwalk trail segments. The trail will be located within Minnesota (MN) Department of Transpor- tation right of way and the University of Minnesota Landscape Arbo- retum. In addition, the trail will likely impact a Minnesota Department of Resources Public Water Wetland. France Avenue Trail from West 84th Street to Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota. Completed a field wetland delineation, delineation reports and agency coordination, and wetland permitting is in progress for a segment of a local multi-use trail, including bitumi- nous and boardwalk trail segments and a stream crossing. The project includes a long segment of boardwalk to avoid/minimize wetland and floodplain impacts to a stream and the surrounding wetland complex. Northwest Greenway Trail Phases I-IV, Plymouth, Minnesota. Completed field wetland delineations, delineation reports, agency coordination, and wetland permitting for several segments of a regional multi-use trail, including bituminous and boardwalk trail segments and a stream crossing. Most of the work was in the vicinity of a large wetland complex. DAVID FILIPIAK, PE | WATER RESOURCES David leads SRF’s Water Resources Group, pro- viding review and oversight with 36 years of experience in engineering and water resources planning. His expertise includes hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of both urban and rural watersheds, preliminary and final design for major storm sewer projects, regional and site-specific Best Manage- ment Practice design, green infrastructure studies and design, com- plex permitting, and major wetland restoration projects. He excels at developing innovative stormwater treatment solutions for both rural and urban projects. Additionally, he has served on numerous techni- cal advisory committees, including the Minnehaha Creek Hydrology and Hydraulics Study, several Local Road Research Board (LRRB) studies on a variety of topics, Modeling, and a MPCA study on Water Quality Sampling Protocols. Project Experience 1NE Watershed Planning and Preliminary Design Project, Minne- apolis, Minnesota. The project includes development and detailed analysis of multiple stormwater management scenarios that address SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 7 flooding and improve water quality and ecological function within the 1NE Watershed in Northeast Minneapolis. Developed that detailed XP-SWMM and P8 modeling, GIS analysis, and concept and prelim- inary design of several types of BMPS, including surface detention basins, underground detention/retention systems, raingardens, and tree trenches. David served as the project advisor for the study. Lake McCarrons Water Quality Study/BMP Design, Roseville, Minnesota. Capitol Regions Watershed District retained SRF to study the Villa Wetland subwatershed to identify locations for poten- tial BMPS to significantly reduce phosphorus loading to the wetland. DAN MCNIEL | PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Dan has five years of experience in public engagement and planning, including youth engagement, transportation planning and parks and recreation planning. He has signifi- cant experience facilitating community work- shops, leading youth engagement activities, planning for connected and automated vehicles and designing long- range public participation processes. Dan is committed to develop- ing meaningful, measurable and adaptable community engagement and is passionate about incorporating underrepresented perspec- tives into planning processes. Project Experience Dakota County CR 9 (Dodd Boulevard) and 179th Street Corridor Study, Minnesota. Dakota County and the City of Lakeville have partnered to coordinate planning efforts and identify improvements for two roadway segments in the City of Lakeville – County Road 9 (Dodd Boulevard) and 179th Street. Dan is serving as a key player in the public involvement coordination with Dakota County and the City of Lakeville. His main responsibilities include developing communi- cation materials, gathering public input through public opens houses, community surveys and online engagement as well as coordinating in-person meetings with the public and adjacent property owners. MnDOT Highway 252/I-94 Redesign, Brooklyn Center and Brook- lyn Park, Minnesota. Dan has supported development of engage- ment materials and staffed public engagement open house events and pop-up community events for this multi-jurisdictional project. BRENT CLARK | TRAFFIC A member of SRF’s Traffic Studies Group, Brent’s work is focused mainly on traffic impact studies and corridor studies. He uses a number of traffic analysis software programs including Synchro/SimTraffic, TRAFFIX, PC-Travel, and IHSM-HSM Predictive Method. Through his work, he has gained valuable experience in traffic operations, traffic forecasting, and intersection safety. Additionally, Brent has preliminary and final roadway design experi- ence, having provided AutoCAD design support to SRF’s Municipal Group. He also previously interned for a consulting engineering/ surveying firm in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, where he provided AutoCAD design support and performed construction inspection and observation, construction staking, and topographic surveying. Project Experience • Arden Hills Lexington Station Traffic Study, Minnesota. • City of Bloomington South Loop District Traffic Study, Minnesota. • Saint Paul Port Authority, Macy’s Department Store Redevelop- ment Traffic Study and TDMP, Saint Paul, Minnesota. • St. Clair Estates Traffic Study, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. KEN HELVEY | RIGHT OF WAY Ken leads SRF’s Real Estate Services Group and manages the acquisition, relocation, and appraisal processes for infrastructure, utility, and development projects. Since 1993, he has provided public and private sector clients with project management, acquisition, compilation of information to prepare work files, coordination of appraisals, negotiations with land owners to acquire right of way and settle damages, completion of relocation services, recording of pertinent documents, and closing of files and preparation of closing documents. Project Experience • MnDOT Hwy 63 Mississippi River Bridge Approach Roadways & Bridges Right of Way Package, Valuation & Acquisition, Red Wing, MN. • MnDOT TH 14 Right of Way Package, St James, Minnesota. • City of Chaska TH 212/CSAH 44 Interchange Right of Way Ser- vices, MN. CASEY BLACK | STRUCTURAL Casey has 15 years of structural engineering experience and has led bridge design projects including rehabilitations, replacements, and new construction in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and North Dakota. He has managed projects using federal, state, and local funding. Casey’s expe- rience includes concrete slabs, prestressed concrete beams, steel girders, and prefabricated steel trusses. He has also served as a construction engineer on bridge replacement and rehabilitation projects, which enables him to foresee potential field issues during the design process and design easily constructible structures. Casey works closely with clients and permitting agencies to ensure project parameters are understood and met. Project Experience • Three Rivers Park District Crystal Lake Regional Trail Boardwalk Overlook, Lakeville, Minnesota. • Three Rivers Park District Luce Line Regional Trail Bridge over CSAH 61 (Xenium Lane), Plymouth, Minnesota. SRF Consulting Group City of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 8 Project Schedule STUDY TASKS FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Project Coordination Project Kickoff Review Available Documents Staff Meetings City Council Meetings County Coordination Meetings Rice Creek Watershed Meetings Project Survey Geotechnical Services Public Engagement Public Survey Community Meeting Alternative Review Construction Plans 30 % Plans 60% Plans and Estimates Cooperative agreement with County Wetland Delineations Parcel Sketches and Easement Descriptions Preliminary Drainage plans and Watershed Permit 90% Plans and Estimates 100% Plans and Estimates Easement Documents County Coordination 2021 As NeededAs Needed 6/1/20216/1/2021 8/9/20218/9/2021 Fee SRF Consulting GroupCity of Arden Hills | Mounds View High School Trail Improvements 9McGarveyPrusak, Crosby Zappetillo McNeil Black Dusheck Filipiak BreuGarfield, Joyce, BokemperAnsell TBDTask #TaskProject ManagerDesign Lead / Alterna-tives LeadWetlands LeadPublic Engage-ment LeadStructural LeadTopographic Services LeadWater Resources LeadWater Resources / Structural SupportTrail Design SupportTopographic Services SupportClericalTotal HoursTotal FeeRequested Tasks1.0 Project Coordination24 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 051 $9,564 2.0 Project Survey0 4 0 0 0 20 0 0 22 30 076 $9,984 3.0Geotechnical Investigation020 00 0 0 02 206 $792 4.0 Public Engagement0 4 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 1646 $4,708 5.0 Alternatives Review2120 0 0 0 0 028 0042 $5,588 6.0Construction Plans (Including Permitting)0 59 60 0 8 0 8 32 125 0 0292 $38,682 7.0 Easement Documents0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 38 0 058 $7,612 8.0 County Coordination48000 0 0 08 0020 $3,080 Sub-Total of Requested Tasks30 126 60 26 8 30 8 32 223 32 16591$80,010Total Estimated Hours SRF Staff30 126 60 26 8 30 8 32 223 32 16 591Hourly Billing Rates SRF Staff$214 $164 $137 $114 $164 $164 $137 $129 $114 $118 $68 Total Fee for SRF Staff $6,420 $20,664 $8,220 $2,964 $1,312 $4,920 $1,096 $4,128 $25,422 $3,776 $1,088 $80,010SRF Direct Expenses (subconsultant, mileage, copies, etc.)$5,800Total Fee + Expenses (not to exceed)$85,810  ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  January 11, 2021 Mr. Todd Blomstrom Mr. David Swearingen Public Works Director / City Engineer Assistant City Engineer City of Arden Hills City of Arden Hills TBlomstrom@cityofardenhills.org DSwearingen@cityofardenhills.org RE: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services – MVHS Trail Improvements PW-21-0105 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Dear Mr. Blomstrom & Mr. Swearingen, Thank you for allowing Bolton & Menk to provide you with this proposal for professional engineering & survey services for preliminary & final design for the Mounds View High School Trail Improvements. This proposal is based on the RFP sent via email on December 17, 2020. As a part of this proposal, we have described our project understanding, detailed our proposed scope of work, and itemized our estimated fees for the project. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Arden Hills is interested in professional planning and design services for construction of a pedestrian trail along Snelling Avenue North from County Road E2 to Lake Valentine Road and along Lake Valentine Road from Crystal Avenue to Mounds View High School. Primary project elements include topographic survey, trail design, stormwater and wetland permitting with Rice Creek Watershed District, coordination with Ramsey County, and easement delineation. The intent is to complete preliminary and final design – to 60% complete, by June 1, 2021. Construction is anticipated in 2022 or 2023. Trail construction will be considered a linear project under Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) standard rules and all new and reconstructed impervious surfaces will require management. Trails follow an exemption if a vegetated buffer at least the width of the trail (up to 10 feet in width) is provided. This is the simplest form of treatment but isn’t always feasible given adjacent grades and private property interaction. We will design stormwater best management practices (BMP) that will reduce or eliminate the need for property acquisition and leverage treatment of the in-place impervious areas to encourage a single regional BMP. We will utilize our firm understanding of RCWD rules, and foundational relationship with RCWD staff, to formulate a stormwater management plan that balances cost and RCWD rule compliance. SCOPE OF WORK In accordance with the City’s request, Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the following scope of work in support of the MVHS Trail Improvements: MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 2 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  Task 1: Project Coordination Bolton & Menk will work in close coordination with the City to develop a project schedule and ensure project deadlines are met. Subtask 1.1: Project Management Project management activities include project monitoring, conducting project meetings and providing project updates. This task also includes coordinating Geotechnical Engineering support. Subtask 1.2: City Meetings Bolton & Menk will be available for project update meetings with City staff every two weeks throughout the project. Bolton & Menk will provide status updates on project development and progress. These meetings will be conducted via phone or Microsoft Teams. We will also attend, and participate as needed in, up to two City Council meetings for the purpose of providing project updates. We anticipate we to attend a council meeting to discuss the preferred layout alternative, as well as present the final plans. Subtask 1.3: Regulatory Agency Coordination Bolton & Menk will facilitate an initial project meeting with City Staff, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and other water resources stakeholders, as needed, during the Alternatives Review phase. This will give the project team an opportunity to describe the project, address potential challenges and opportunities, and frame the proposed solution in the context of RCWD permitting requirements. A second meeting will serve as a pre-permit coordination meeting where the final proposed trail alignment, drainage plan, wetland impacts, and stormwater best management practices (BMP) will be presented to RCWD staff for final feedback. It is anticipated meetings with RCWD will be held virtually. Subtask 1.4: County Coordination Our project team will coordinate with Ramsey County as a part of the project. Our project manager will attend, and facilitate as needed, up to two meetings with Ramsey County. It is expected that these meetings will be conducted via phone or Microsoft Teams. Task 1 Deliverables: Meeting agendas, meeting minutes Task 2: Project Survey This task is intended to gather existing topographic, utility, and site feature information. This task also includes wetland services. Subtask 2.1 Topographic Survey Our team will gather pertinent field information on City infrastructure, right-of-way, private utilities, etc. Underground utility information will be located and illustrated per available as-builts, field markings, and private utility map information facilitated through Gopher State One Call. A base map will be created identifying existing ground and utility features in electronic format. This base map will be utilized as the basis and background for preliminary engineering and final design. A full topographic survey will be completed from back of curb to five feet beyond right-of-way along Lake Valentine Road and from center of the southbound travel lane to five feet beyond right-of-way along Snelling Avenue. Structure reports will be completed for the handful of storm structures in the southwest quadrant of Lake Valentine Road and Snelling Avenue. MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 3 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  Subtask 2.2 Wetland Services Bolton & Menk will thoroughly investigate the available background information needed prior to visiting the site. This includes compiling information as follows: 1. Available Aerial Photographs 2. Ramsey County LiDAR Maps 3. National Wetlands Inventory Maps 4. Ramsey County Soil Survey Maps 5. MNDNR Public Waters Maps Subtask 2.2a Level 2 Wetland Delineation We will visit the site to delineate all aquatic resource boundaries within the designated study area. The delineation will include performing transects and sampling in the vicinity of those wetlands, placing 3- foot pin flags at the limits of any wetlands found. Our delineator will use a sub-meter GPS unit to accurately locate and map each point and preparing a written report of our findings. Subtask 2.2b Aquatic Resource Impact Permitting Bolton & Menk will use the aquatic resource delineation to determine and prepare the appropriate permit application to account for any aquatic resource impacts proposed by the project. This will include the MN Joint Application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Local Government Unit, as well as an MPARS application completed for review by the MNDNR. The applications will include GIS based figures and sequencing analysis, permit narrative and project plan set. Subtask 2.2c Meetings - Wetland Permitting In some cases, the reviewing agencies request additional information and/or an on-site meeting during the review process. If our attendance is requested at a meeting to discuss the acceptance of the delineated boundaries or the agencies request additional information, this service will be provided on an hourly basis at our Wetland Specialist rate. We have included one site meeting as a part of this proposal. Task 2 Deliverables: A digital copy of the topographic survey base map, in AutoCAD, including topographic survey, right-of-way and property line information. Aquatic resource delineation and necessary wetland permit applications. Task 3: Geotechnical Investigation Bolton & Menk has retained Braun Intertec as a sub-consultant for geotechnical services for this project. The purpose of Braun’s geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the trail improvements project. Braun’s proposal and full scope of work is available upon request. The geotechnical evaluation will include: x 6 Penetration Borings, ranging in depth from 10 to 14.5 feet x 3 Penetration Borings, ranging in depth from 20 to 25 feet x 1 penetration boring to a depth of 15 feet in the area of a stormwater pond x Geotechnical Report including: o Log of borings o Summary of the subsurface conditions o Discussion regarding reuse of on-site material during construction o Recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 4 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  o Recommendations for the design and construction of trails (including pavement design), retaining walls, utilities, and stormwater improvements As discussed with the City, it is expected that City staff will help with snow clearing and traffic control as needed to complete the geotechnical boring work. Bolton & Menk, and Braun, also request any soils information for past projects in the area, namely the trail along Snelling Avenue, south of County Road E2. Task 3 Deliverables: Geotechnical report with design/construction recommendations Task 4: Public Engagement Bolton and Menk will facilitate one public informational meeting during the design phase of the project. It is expected this meeting will be held virtually in between March-May 2021. The informational meeting will allow the project team to share the preliminary concept layout and gather input from the area property owners. A survey will also be shared with area property owners to gather input. Task 4 Deliverables: Informational meeting letter, presentation, and survey Task 5: Alternatives Review Bolton & Menk will prepare up to two alignment alternatives for review with City staff. The alternatives presented will share, at a high-level, impacts to right of way, existing utilities and ground features, wetlands, and permitting. A preliminary cost estimate will also be provided. As preliminary trail alignments are reviewed, drainage solutions and proposed BMP strategies will be presented. This will include one preliminary BMP layout per trail alignment, other potential drainage improvements, and a summary of challenges in meeting RCWD Rules. For instance, one effective strategy for meeting stormwater requirements in RCWD is to provide a vegetated buffer on the down slope at least the width of the trail. This may not be feasible in certain areas based on adjacent grades or private property lines, so other BMP configurations will be necessary. Additionally, the regional BMP located Valentine Park could be expanded to accommodate the new impervious area requiring treatment, depending on the current size of the practice, total treatment area, and available space. Task 5 Deliverables: Two plan view layouts, meeting agendas, meeting minutes Task 6: Construction Plans (Final Design) Bolton & Menk will complete final design and preparation of construction plans. Final design will be based off the alignment alternative selected in Task 5. Subtask 6.1: Plan Set The project plan set will include the plan sheets as listed in the RFP: Title Sheet, SEQ, Construction Notes, Standard Plates, Typical Sections, Removal Sheets, Plan & Profile sheets for Trail, drainage and retaining walls, pavement restoration, Grading Plan, Erosion Control Plan, SWPPP, and Cross-Sections. In anticipation of retaining walls adjacent to the trail along Snelling Avenue, we have included time to prepare a plan and profile for the retaining well. It is expected that the walls will be big block walls, similar to the existing wall along Snelling Avenue, south of County Road E2. Our structural engineer will assist with the details for the walls. MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 5 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  ƒ”ƒŠŽ‘›†ǡǤǤ ”‘Œ‡…–ƒƒ‰‡” ‹…ƒ–—……‹‘ǡǤǤ ”Ǥ”‘Œ‡…–‰‹‡‡” ”‹…‹ŽˆƒŠ”–ǡǤǤ —”˜‡›ƒƒ‰‡” ‹Ž•‘ǡǤǤ ƒ–‡”‡•‘—”…‡• ”‘Œ‡…–ƒƒ‰‡” ”ƒ†‘‘Š• ‡–Žƒ† ’‡…‹ƒŽ‹•– ‡•‹‰‰‹‡‡”‰‹‡‡”‹‰ ‡…Š‹…‹ƒ Subtask 6.2: Project Submittals Plan submittals will be made at 30% for City Review and at 60% & 90% for City and County Review. An Engineer’s Estimate will be included with the 60% and 90% submittals. Following 90% plan comments, final plans will be submitted for final City and County approval. Subtask 6.3: Project Specifications As noted in the RFP, final bidding documents including project specification, and final Rice Creek Watershed District Permit will be completed under an amendment to this proposal. Subtask 6.3: Permits Bolton & Menk will prepare RCWD permit documents that include: stormwater management plan narrative, description of rule compliance, associated figures depicting drainage conditions, hydraulic modeling, soils information, and any other materials to meet permit compliance. Submittal will be made to RCWD for initial review. We will also prepare NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit materials. Necessary wetland permit applications will also be initiated. Task 6 Deliverables: Final construction plans, permit applications initiated  Task 7: Easement Documents This task includes preparing up to 19 easement exhibits with descriptions for easement acquisition. As stated in the RFP, the City will be responsible for preparing easement appraisals and offers. Task 7 Deliverables: Easement exhibits, up to 19. Task 8: County Coordination Our project team will coordinate with Ramsey County as a part of the project. We will attend, and facilitate as needed, up to two meetings with Ramsey County. It is expected that these meetings will be conducted via phone or Microsoft Teams.  Task 8 Deliverables: Meeting agenda and meeting minutes PROJECT TEAM Bolton & Menk proposes to use a project team familiar to the City of Arden Hills for the Mounds View High School Trail Project. I will serve as your Project Manager and Nick Amatuccio will, again, serve as the design lead engineer/assistant or the project. The water resources work, including coordination with the Rice Creek Watershed District, will again be led by Tim Olson. The following organizational chart further describes the project team that will work with the City of Arden Hills on this project. MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 6 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  TEAM RESUMES Sarah E. Lloyd, P.E., Project Manager Sarah will serve as your primary point of contact. She has the qualifications, experience, motivation, and work ethic to effectively manage and coordinate each project phase. Sarah will provide close coordination with the City of Arden Hills and project partners. She will be responsible for overall team management and all schedule, cost, public outreach, and scope management processes. Related Experience: Rose Bluff Trail - City of Burnsville, Edinborough Park Improvements – City of Edina, Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction – City of Richfield, 2021 PMP Improvements – City of Arden Hills Nick Amatuccio, P.E., Sr. Project Engineer As the lead project engineer, Nick will work with the team to ensure the street and utility improvements are buildable and meet the necessary requirements. Nick will be responsible for overall project design and schedule. Related Experience: Interlachen Park Street & Utility Improvements - City of Hopkins, 2019 Trail Improvements – City of Burnsville, 2021 PMP Improvements – City of Arden Hills Additional Key Leaders Name and Title Role Eric Wilfahrt, L.S. Survey Manager Eric will coordinate with survey crew chiefs to complete topographic survey in a timely manner as soon as authorization of this proposal is received. He will coordinate with our survey drafters to implement field shots into an AutoCAD drawing for plan use. He will manage survey staking requests throughout construction. Eric has been involved with past projects for Arden Hills and is familiar with the community. Tim Olson, P.E., CFM Water Resources Manager Tim will evaluate options for storm sewer layouts as provided in the RFP and confirm the chosen layout will sufficiently address neighborhood drainage concerns. He will work closely with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) to determine what BMP measures are needed to address their requirements. Tim has extensive experience with the RCWD including permitting, grant work, and contract work. He has worked with the RCWD in multiple communities and has personal contacts with the majority of their staff at nearly all levels. Brandon Bohks, WDCP Wetland Specialist Brandon is a wetland specialist who began his career in 2016. He will delineate aquatic resources for the MVHS Trail project. He will map each point and prepare a written report. Brandon will also determine the permitting needs associated with the Aquatic Resources and prepare the appropriate permit applications. A favorite part of Brandon’s job is ensuring accurate wetland boundaries are delineated. MVHS Trail Improvements – PW-21-0105 January 11, 2021 Page 7 ǣ̳”‘’‘•ƒŽ•̳”†‡ ‹ŽŽ•̳ʹͲʹͳ ”ƒ‹Ž̳†”ƒˆ– ”ƒ‹ŽǤ†‘…š  PROJECT SCHEDULE Bolton & Menk is committed to meeting the City’s project deadline of 60% design by June 1, 2021. Pending coordination with the RCWD and Ramsey County, it is our goal to have the final plans complete in June. A preliminary detailed schedule is provided on page 8 of this proposal. ESTIMATED FEES Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the above scope of work on an hourly basis for a not to exceed hourly fee of $172,300. These fees for the individual tasks are estimates, a breakdown of the estimated fees are below. A detailed breakdown of tasks, staff hours, and associated fees is included on page 9 of this proposal Task 1: Project Coordination $ 12,400 Task 2: Project Survey Subtask 2.1: Topographic Survey $ 20,000 Subtask 2.2: Wetland Services $ 9,300 Task 3: Geotechnical Evaluation $ 15,800 (includes subconsultant fee) Task 4: Public Engagement $ 4,100 Task 5: Alternatives Review $ 42,000 Task 6: Construction Plans $ 80,000 Task 7: Easement Documents $ 17,400 Task 8: County Coordination $ 1,300 Subtotal Estimated Fee $202,300 Fee Reduction ($30,000) Total Estimated Fee $172,300 Thank you, again, for the opportunity to present this proposal for professional engineering and surveying services to you for the Mounds View High School Trail Improvements. We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have questions on the scope or hours tied to any of the tasks, we are happy to discuss the details with you. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Sarah E. Lloyd, P.E. Principal Engineer Month1.0 Project Coordination1.1 Project Kickoff Meeting with City Staff1.2 Project Coordination meetings (every 2-weeks)1.3 City Council Meetings (2)1.4 Watershed District Coordination (2 Meetings)2.0 Project Survey / Wetland Services2.1 Topographic Survey2.2 Wetland Services3.0 Geotechnical Investigation3.1 Braun Field Work4.0 Public Engagement4.1 Informational Meeting / Surveys5.0 Alternatives Review5.1 Preliminary Concept Trail Alignment5.2 Preliminary ROW & Stormwater Management Impacts5.3 Concept Level Cost Estimate6.0 Construction Plans6.1 Final Design & Plan Development6.2 Submittals (60%, 90%, Final)7.0 Easement Documents7.1 Easement Exhibits & Descriptions8.0 County Coordination8.1 Ramsey County Coordination Meetings2021FebruaryMarchAprilCity of Arden HillsMVHS Trail ImprovementsMayJuneMVHS Trail ImprovementsCity of Arden Hills, MNPage 8 Client: City of Arden HillsTask No.Work Task DescriptionProject ManagerSenior Project EngineerSurvey ManagerWater Resources Project ManagerStructural EngineerWetland SpecialistWater Resources EngineerDesign EngineerEngineering Technician / DrafterSurvey TechnicianSurvey Crew ChiefAbstract Company DeedsAbstract Company Road Easement SearchClericalTotal HoursTotal Cost1.0Project Coordination 402606004000000076$12,4322.0 Project Survey / Wetland Services 0 0 12 0 0 91 0 0 0 20 100 0 2 2 227$29,2453.0 Geotechnical Investigation 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 6 0 0 0 7 $1,0694.0Public Engagement 81200000400000428$4,0885.0 Alternatives Review 12 64 0 10 0 10 60 140 24 0 0 0 0 0 320$41,9726.0 Construction Plans 2 92 0 22 20 0 100 288 92 0 0 0 0 0 616$79,7787.0 Easement Documents 4 12 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 131$17,3968.0County Coordination 440000000000008$1,308Total Hours70 210 53.5 38 20 101 164 432 116 94.5 106 0 2 6 1413Average Hourly Rate$178.00 $149.00 $172.00 $157.00 $164.00 $103.00 $124.00 $125.00 $115.00$106.00 $155.00 $22.00 $125.00 $94.000Subtotal$12,460 $31,290 $9,202 $5,966 $3,280 $10,403 $20,336 $54,000 $13,340 $10,017 $16,430 $0 $250 $564Fee ReductionSubconsultant Fee (Braun Geotechnical Work)$14,750TOTAL PROPOSED FEE$172,038$187,288($30,000)Detailed Cost EstimateSubtotal FeeBolton & Menk, Inc.Project: MVHS Trail ImprovementsMVHS Trail ImprovementsCity of Arden Hills, MNPage 9 Prepared for Prepared By City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Solicitation No. PW-21-0105 | January 2021 MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr. Blomstrom and Mr. Swearingen: Kimley-Horn is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Arden Hills for the Mounds View High School (MVHS) Trail Improvements project. We understand the City is seeking a consultant to provide engineering and surveying services for a pedestrian trail along Snelling Avenue North from County Road E2 to Lake Valentine Road and along Lake Valentine Road from Crystal Avenue to MVHS. The City has enhanced its trail network with multiple projects over the past decade and is now looking to continue those efforts by connecting MVHS and the Valentine Hills neighborhood to the trail V\VWHP.LPOH\+RUQSURYLGHVWKHIROORZLQJEHQHƄWVWRWKH&LW\WRGHOLYHU this project: Extensive Trail Design Experience. Kimley-Horn has completed trail design of more than 10 miles of trails in Arden Hills and Ramsey County in the SDVWƄYH\HDUVLQFOXGLQJWKHWUDLODGMDFHQWWR09+6FRPSOHWHGLQWR which this project will connect. The trail design along Old Snelling Avenue will require close coordination with Ramsey County Public Works. Kimley- Horn has proven to be a trusted partner who is committed, dependable, and proactive in looking out for our clients’ interests. Our Ramsey County and Arden Hills trail design experience includes the following: z Lake Valentine Road Trail Improvements z County Road E Bridge Pedestrian Improvements z Rice Creek Remeander and Trail Improvements z Bruce Vento Trail Extension Final Design z South Shore Boulevard Trail z Cleveland Avenue Trail User Experience at the Forefront. Kimley-Horn’s trail design approach will balance the perspectives of the trail user and neighborhood throughout design. Our focus will be on successful user experience, safety, and how the WUDLOFRPSRQHQWVƄWLQWRDEXWWLQJSURSHUWLHVPHDQLQJHYHU\GHVLJQGHFLVLRQ we make will be thoughtful and intentional. We are excited to have the opportunity to provide our unparalleled experience at a competitive cost to serve Arden Hills for this project. Please contact me ZLWKDQ\TXHVWLRQVDWJUHJNXIDKO#NLPOH\KRUQFRPRU Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc GREG KUFAHL, P.E. Project Manager JON B. HORN, P.E. Principal-in-Charge RE:JANUARY 11, 2021 TODD BLOMSTROM CITY ENGINEER DAVID SWEARINGEN ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER City of Arden Hills :+LJKZD\ Arden Hills, MN 55112 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES (XVWLV6WUHHW6XLWH 6W3DXO01 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Project Understanding and Approach..... .............................1 B. Scope of Services ................. 2 C. Project Team ......................... 4 D. Resume of Project Manager and Key Team Members ................... 6 E. Project Schedule ................... 9 F. Fee Table ............................. 10 RSRD06039.2020 1 23 Lake Valentine R o a d 4 S n e l l i n g A v e 1 1 1 Lake Valentine Road Maintenance of front yard landscaping Driveway crossings Grading/retaining walls Overhead utility relocation Opportunities for boulevard separation Snelling Avenue North Maintenance of vegetative screening of residences Drainage/storm sewer/water quality Wetland impacts Grading/retaining walls Overhead utility relocation Opportunities for boulevard separation Issues Map Notes 1. Improve intersection crossing safety 2. Design intersection to facilitate future trail extension 3. Consider meander through Valentine Park 4. Consider intersection improvements to reduce crossing distance at CR E2 Proposed Trail Existing Trail Mounds View High School Valentine Lake Bethel College Design Considerations County Road E2 West A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH The City of Arden Hills is seeking professional planning and design services for the construction of an off- road multi-use trail along Snelling Avenue North and Lake Valentine Road. The proposed trail will provide a convenient link for the Valentine Hills neighborhood and MVHS and complete a gap in the existing trail network between New Brighton to the west and County Road E2 to the south. The character of the corridor varies from Lake Valentine Road consisting of curb and gutter street with manicured front yards with landscaping and driveways to Old Snelling Avenue which includes a rural roadway with a more natural feel with Valentine Lake on one side and a thick vegetative screen abutting adjacent residential back yards. Valentine Park is situated at the intersection of these two segments. 7KHFRUULGRULQFOXGHVIHHWRIDYDLODEOHULJKWRIZD\ beyond roadway edges however some additional property acquisition may be necessary to construct the trail due to grading and drainage concerns. The construction of curb and gutter along with storm drainage infrastructure is envisioned along the Old Snelling Avenue segment to facilitate the trail. Our design approach will focus on the following key elements: Trail User Experience: We approach trail design from the perspective of the experience of anticipated users. 7UDLOZLGWKDOLJQPHQWVHSDUDWLRQIURPWUDIƄFVLJKWOLQHV and opportunities to create interest are all elements we consider as we develop alternatives for evaluation and testing. A successful trail design will not only provide safe and convenient connection, it will also provide an enjoyable experience. Intersection Safety: The trail includes six intersections with county and city streets. We will assess each intersection’s unique characteristics to develop options that enhance trail safety through improved sightlines, intuitive pedestrian ramp layout, and reduced crossing distances where possible. Being a Good Neighbor: With the exception of Valentine Park, the proposed trail will be constructed in front or back yards of established neighborhoods. We understand that the design needs to be sensitive to this fact and considerate of interests and wishes of the abutting property owners in order to be well received in the community. We will consider how design alternatives may impact or enhance abutting properties and communicate that information honestly and respectfully to the property owners. Connections to the Existing Network: The proposed trail includes connections to existing trails at four locations along the corridor. We will review existing pedestrian ramps at these locations and assess whether they comply ZLWKFXUUHQW$'$GHVLJQJXLGDQFH0RGLƄFDWLRQVWRWKHVH UDPSVZLOOEHLGHQWLƄHGLIDSSURSULDWHIRUFRPSOLDQFHRUWR provide better safety and trail alignment. Design Considerations RSRD06039.2020 2 B. SCOPE OF SERVICES Kimley-Horn will perform the scope of work and list of deliverables outlined in the Scope of Services section of the Request for Proposals (RFP). An overview of tasks and milestones we will achieve in order to complete the development of the MVHS Trail Improvements are summarized below. TASK 1 - PROJECT COORDINATION As illustrated in the Project Team section starting on SDJH.LPOH\+RUQRIIHUVDVXSHULRUWHDPOHGE\SURMHFW manager, Greg Kufahl, P.E., who will lead this project through completion. Throughout the design process, Greg and the team are ready to review the following project information and attend and lead the following meetings. Materials Review We will review all available project documents including as built drawings of the existing roadway, previous studies and funding applications of the project area, and lessons learned from previous trail extension projects that the City has already completed. Project Meetings We will attend and lead the following meetings throughout SUHOLPLQDU\DQGƄQDOGHVLJQWROHDGWKLVSURMHFWWKURXJKRXW the design process. z Project kick-off meeting (1 meeting) z Project status meetings (up to 12 meetings, every 2 weeks) z Stakeholder meetings: • City Council meetings (up to 2 meetings) • Ramsey County coordination meetings (up to 2 meetings) • Rice Creek Watershed District coordination meetings (up to 2 meetings) Task 1 Deliverables z Agendas and meeting notes for project meetings TASK 2 - PROJECT SURVEY Project Survey Pioneer Engineering will complete a topographic survey WRVXSSRUWWKHSUHOLPLQDU\DQGƄQDOGHVLJQRIWKHWUDLO LPSURYHPHQWVLQFOXGLQJURDGZD\PRGLƄFDWLRQV7KH survey will focus on the south side of Lake Valentine Road and west side of Snelling Avenue. We anticipate DSSUR[LPDWHO\ƄYHGD\VRIƄHOGVXUYH\WRSUHSDUHDQLQLWLDO EDVHPDSDQGKDYHDOORWWHGWKUHHDGGLWLRQDOGD\VRIƄHOG crew time to locate additional areas that may arise during the design process. Utility One-Call We will conduct a Gopher State Utility One-Call for the project area to obtain the location of the existing private utilities within the project area. This information will be collected and reviewed compared to the markings that KDYHEHHQIRXQGLQWKHƄHOGIRULQFRUSRUDWLRQLQWRWKH overall base map. Project Base Map The project survey base map is anticipated to be a FRPSLODWLRQRIWKHUHVXOWVRIWKHƄHOGVXUYH\FROOHFWHGE\ Pioneer, any data provided by the City of Arden Hills, and the information gathered from the Utility One-Call. The existing conditions base map will be prepared following Arden Hills standards outlined in the RFP and include IRRWFRQWRXUVVLJQLƄFDQWWUHHV LQFKGLDPHWHUDQG larger), private landscaping elements, utilities, and property lines within the project limits based on available property corner monuments. The basemap will utilize Ramsey &RXQW\&RRUGLQDWH6\VWHPDVVSHFLƄHGLQWKH5)3 Task 2 Deliverables z 7KHFRPSOHWHG3URMHFW%DVH0DS&$'ƄOHZLOOEHVHQW to City staff for review z GSOC information/data received TASK 3 - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION American Engineering Testing will complete a geotechnical investigation for the project including GULOOLQJERULQJV IRRWGHSWK WRVXSSRUWWKHGHVLJQ of the trail improvements. A geotechnical report will be SUHSDUHGLQFOXGLQJƄHOGORJVRIWKHERULQJRSHUDWLRQ SUHOLPLQDU\VRLOFODVVLƄFDWLRQDQGREVHUYHGJURXQGZDWHU levels. Laboratory testing results including moisture content, organic content, and soil components will be tabulated. The report will provide an estimated R-value(s) and subgrade preparation recommendations to support the design of trail and roadway pavements as well RSRD06039.2020 3 as retaining walls that may be part of the proposed improvements. Task 3 Deliverables z Geotechnical report TASK 4 - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT The public engagement process is vital to building trust with the residents and other stakeholders in the project area. The stakeholders need to feel that they are well-informed of the design progress and are provided ample opportunity to give meaningful input on the issues that are most important to them. We acknowledge that these are not typical times and our approach to informing and engaging the public PXVWEHPRUHFUHDWLYHDQGƅH[LEOHWKDQHYHU2XU team understands this delicate balance and brings forward strong city connections, trail experience, and environmental expertise that will help bridge the gap between engineering and community impact. Task 4 Deliverables z Public meeting invitation z Prepare property owner survey z Facilitate virtual public information meeting with property owners TASK 5 - ALTERNATIVES REVIEW We understand the importance that decisions made early on during the design process have on the effectiveness RIWKHƄQDOGHVLJQRIWKHSURMHFW7REHFRQƄGHQWZLWK WKHGHVLJQWKDWZHFDUU\LQWRƄQDOGHVLJQZHSURSRVH to analyze up to three different combinations of trail DOLJQPHQWVW\SLFDOVHFWLRQVSURƄOHVDQGUHWDLQLQJZDOOV for review with City staff to determine the preferred trail FRQƄJXUDWLRQ$OWHUQDWLYHVZLOOFRQVLGHUDYDLODEOHULJKWRI way, property owner impacts, drainage and environmental impacts, project costs, and public input to determine the preferred alternative. Task 5 Deliverables z 7KUHH  DOWHUQDWLYHWUDLOOD\RXWVKLJKOLJKWLQJWKHRYHUDOO impacts of each layout z Evaluation matrix to rank proposed alternatives z Meeting agenda, materials, and minutes for alternatives review meeting TASK 6 - CONSTRUCTION PLANS :HZLOOGHYHORSDVHWRIDQG construction plans according to the plan sheets that have EHHQLGHQWLƄHGLQWKH5)3$OOFRQVWUXFWLRQSODQVKHHWV will be designed to State Aid design standards and meet all City and County standards required for plan approvals. Kimley-Horn’s experience with trail design within Ramsey County will help to make sure all applicable design information required for each submittal will be included to help facilitate the design reviews. Comment disposition and resolution forms will be included along with each submittal to help make sure that each comment is addressed prior to the next submittal. Task 6 Deliverables z DQGSODQVDQG23& z Comment disposition and resolution forms with each submittal z 3URYLGHWKUHH  SDSHUFRSLHVDQGD3')GLJLWDOFRS\ RIƄQDOSODQV TASK 7 - EASEMENT DOCUMENTS Pioneer Engineering will review Title Commitments (provided by Arden Hills or Ramsey County) and prepare temporary and/or permanent easement GRFXPHQWVIRUXSWRSDUFHOVEDVHGRQWKH construction requirements associated with the approved plans. The easement documents will consist of a drawing and legal description by parcel suitable for recording with Ramsey County. Boundary information is assumed to be based on property corner monuments located as a part of the topographic survey and does not assume individual boundary surveys by parcel. Task 7 Deliverables z (DVHPHQWGRFXPHQWVIRUXSWRSDUFHOV TASK 8 – COUNTY COORDINATION Kimley-Horn has completed dozens of projects for 5DPVH\&RXQW\VLQFHRSHQLQJRXU7ZLQ&LWLHVRIƄFHLQ 2002, including recent trail projects such as the Bruce Vento Trail Final Design and South Shore Trail. As a result, our team has extensive experience coordinating project efforts with Ramsey County. Kimley-Horn is thoroughly familiar with the County’s processes and procedures and our staff maintains solid professional relationships with County staff. This allows our team to successfully and RSRD06039.2020 4 C. PROJECT TEAM The organization chart below outlines our key team members and their responsibilities. Brief resumes of key staff begin on the following page. FIRM OVERVIEW .LPOH\+RUQLVDIXOOVHUYLFHHQJLQHHULQJDQGSODQQLQJƄUPFRPSRVHGRIFLYLOHQJLQHHUVVWUXFWXUDOHQJLQHHUVURDGZD\ engineers, transportation planners, environmental professionals, and public engagement experts. Our Twin Cities RIƄFHLVSDUWRIDODUJHUQDWLRQDOƄUPZLWKPRUHWKDQVWDIILQFOXGLQJORFDOSURIHVVLRQDOV$VDƄUPZHDUH organized as one company with multiple locations—our organization structure is focused on high quality client service. PROJECT EXPERIENCE County Road F/Lake Valentine Road Improvements, Arden Hills, MN .LPOH\+RUQSURYLGHGƄQDOGHVLJQVHUYLFHVWRWKH&LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOVIRUDWUDLOFRQQHFWLRQDORQJ&RXQW\5RDG)/DNH Valentine Road. The project included construction of curb and gutter on the south side of Lake Valentine Road, storm sewer, retaining walls, railings, and mill and overlay to facilitate the construction of the trail extension along Lake Valentine Road from New Brighton to MVHS. Kimley-Horn led all facets of the design which included topographic survey, geotechnical evaluation, MnDOT coordination, Rice Creek Watershed coordination, stormwater management design, preparation of construction documents, and bidding assistance. Bruce Vento Trail Final Design, Ramsey County, MN .LPOH\+RUQSURYLGHGSUHOLPLQDU\DQGƄQDOGHVLJQIRUWKHQHDUO\PLOHH[WHQVLRQRIWKH%UXFH9HQWR5HJLRQDO7UDLO IURP%XHUNOH5RDGWR&6$+LQWKH&LW\RI:KLWH%HDU/DNH7KHSURMHFWUHTXLUHGVLJQLƄFDQWDJHQF\LQYROYHPHQW including Ramsey County Parks, Ramsey County Public Works, Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority, City of White Bear Lake, and BNSF Railroad. The trail extension was constructed along an active railroad corridor and through a mix of residential and commercial districts, so the design had to balance the several competing needs throughout 1 American Engineering Testing 2 Pioneer Engineering Geotechnical Matt Ruble, P.E.1 Survey Blaine Marion, PLS2 Trail Design Emily Bowen Retaining Wall Design Matt Jensen, P.E. Public Engagement Leila Bunge, AICP Project Manager/Trail Design Lead Greg Kufahl, P.E. Principal-in-Charge Jon Horn, P.E. Drainage Design Ron Leaf, P.E. VPRRWKO\JXLGHWKH&LW\pVSURMHFWVIURPVWDUWWRƄQLVKDFTXLULQJDQ\QHFHVVDU\5DPVH\&RXQW\UHYLHZVDQGDSSURYDOV Task 8 Deliverables z Project location map and cost participation summary for the cooperative agreement z Attend and prepare for up to two coordination meetings (as noted in Task 1) RSRD06039.2020 5 WKHFRUULGRU2XUVHUYLFHVLQFOXGHGRYHUDOOWUDLOGHVLJQUHWDLQLQJZDOOGHVLJQDQGPRGLƄFDWLRQVWRWKH&RXQW\5RDG( DQG7+EULGJHVRYHU%16)WUDFNVWRDOORZIRUWKHWUDLOWRSDVVXQGHUWKHURDGZD\V Rice Creek Remeander and Trail Improvements, Ramsey County, MN Ramsey County selected the Kimley-Horn team to relocate and reintroduce meanders within a portion of Rice &UHHNDIIHFWLQJDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWRIH[LVWLQJFKDQQHO7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHSURMHFWZDVWRIDFLOLWDWHWKH UHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQDW&RXQW\5RDG &5 +,:QRUWKERXQG 1% RQUDPSSURSRVHG,:1%H[LW UDPSDQGWKHSURSRVHG5LFH&UHHN&RPPRQV IRUPHU7&$$3VLWH DFFHVVURDGVLQWRDƄYHOHJJHGGRXEOHODQH roundabout. The realignment of the creek was designed to minimize the length of channel that would be placed in culverts and provide opportunity for creek enhancements. The project added more than 500 feet of channel length to Rice Creek by realigning the creek around the new CR H roundabout intersection and adding meanders to the new FUHHNFKDQQHO$IRRWORQJIRRWE\IRRWGRXEOHER[FXOYHUWZDVUHSODFHGE\DEULGJH7KHSURMHFWLQYROYHG grading, installation of culverts, installation of utility casings, erosion control, and restoration. Rush Line Corridor Environmental Analysis, Ramsey County, MN The project includes reconstruction of more than 5 miles of Bruce Vento Regional trail in conjunction with the addition RIPLOHVRI%57FRUULGRU$VWKHSULPHFRQVXOWDQW.LPOH\+RUQGHYHORSHGDQGWHVWHGGHVLJQDOWHUQDWLYHVDVVRFLDWHG with trail relocation and facilitated numerous public engagement events focused on how the BRT guideway and trail FRXOGLQWHUDFWZLWKHDFKRWKHU3UHOLPLQDU\HQJLQHHULQJZRUNKDVLQFOXGHGGHYHORSPHQWRIWUDLODOLJQPHQWVSURƄOHV cross sections, trail underpasses and bridges, retaining walls and safety improvements at street crossings. Kimley- +RUQOHGWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIGHVLJQJXLGHOLQHVWRLQIRUPƄQDOGHVLJQHOHPHQWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHWUDLOFRUULGRUVXFK as landscaping, fencing, lighting and retaining wall aesthetics. 5th Street Pedestrian Bridge over I-35W, Minneapolis, MN .LPOH\+RUQSURYLGHGFRQFHSWUHƄQHPHQWSXEOLFHQJDJHPHQWYLVXDOTXDOLW\PDQXDODQGSUHOLPLQDU\DQGƄQDOGHVLJQ IRUWKHSHGHVWULDQEULGJHLQFOXGLQJIHHWRIDSSURDFKWUDLOVORFDOVWUHHWPRGLƄFDWLRQVOLJKWLQJDQG$'$DFFHVV improvements. SUBCONSULTANTS Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Pioneer Engineering will provide survey services for the MVHS Trail Improvements project. Pioneer Engineering is a professional association (P.A.) comprised of land surveyors, land planners, civil engineers, and landscape architects. 3LRQHHUpVVXUYH\GHSDUWPHQWXVHVVWDWHRIWKHDUWVRIWZDUHLQFOXGLQJ$XWRGHVN&LYLOGDQG7ULPEOH%XVLQHVV&HQWHUDV well as the latest technology for land surveying of St. Paul and surrounding areas. American Engineering Testing (AET) AET will provide geotechnical services for the MVHS Trail Improvements project. AET has a strong reputation as the source for forensics, environmental, materials, geotechnical engineering consulting and accredited testing capabilities. RSRD06039.2020 6 D. RESUME OF PROJECT MANAGER AND KEY TEAM MEMBERS Kimley-Horn has carefully selected and organized our team to bring the right people, skills, and experiences to positively and productively help guide this project. PROJECT TEAM Greg Kufahl, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER/TRAIL DESIGN LEAD Greg is a well-rounded project manager with municipal project experience that includes roadway, drainage, and utility design components. Greg’s roadway experience ranges from local neighborhood streets to arterial roadways and includes roundabout design. Greg understands the interrelationship between the surface and underground improvements and is experienced with bicycle and pedestrian elements related to projects including trails, on-street bike lanes and ADA design considerations at intersections. Greg will take an active role in the design details of the project and serve as the primary point of contact between Arden Hills staff and the design team from the initiation of the project design through bidding, construction, punchlist completion and as-built preparation. Project Experience z Bruce Vento Trail Extension, Ramsey County, MN — Project Engineer. z South Shore Regional Trail, Ramsey County, MN — Project Engineer. z Rice Creek Remeander and Trail Improvements, Ramsey County, MN — Project Engineer. z CSAH 13 Pedestrian Bridge over I-94 and Roadway Improvements, Washington County, MN — Project Engineer. z 5th Street Pedestrian Bridge over I-35W, Minneapolis, MN — Project Engineer. z CSAH 5 Pedestrian and Safety Improvements, Washington County, MN — Project Engineer. Jon Horn, P.E. PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Jon will provide general oversight of the project to see that your needs are being met and you receive a KLJKOHYHORIVHUYLFH+HRIIHUVPRUHWKDQ\HDUVRIFRQVXOWLQJH[SHULHQFHLQFOXGLQJDZLGHYDULHW\RI project types. Jon’s experience includes leading projects from the initial planning and feasibility study stages through ƄQDOGHVLJQDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQ+HDOVRLVH[SHULHQFHGLQWKHSXEOLFLQYROYHPHQWSURFHVVLQFOXGLQJ&LW\&RXQFLODQG large group presentations, facilitation of open house meetings, and leading small group and one-on-one meetings. Jon will oversee Kimley-Horn’s overall quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program. This will include working with the project manager and key task managers to use processes and procedures that will lead to quality work products. Project Experience z County Road F/Lake Valentine Road Improvements, Arden Hills, MN — Principal-in-Charge. z Rice Creek Remeander and Trail Improvements, Ramsey County, MN — Principal-in-Charge. z Bruce Vento Trail Final Design, Ramsey County, MN — Principal-in-Charge. z CSAH 13 Pedestrian Bridge over I-94, Washington County, MN — Principal-in-Charge. z Lake Links Trail Improvements (McKnight Road to Bellaire Avenue), Maplewood, MN — Project Manager. z Mississippi River Regional Trail Heritage Village Park and Rock Island Swing Bridge Trail and Wayside Rest Facilities, Dakota County, MN — Principal-in-Charge. RSRD06039.2020 7 Emily Bowen TRAIL DESIGN Emily has experience with design and engineering of trail, roadway, drainage, and utility improvements for projects across the metro. Emily’s trail and roadway design experience includes preparation of concepts DVZHOODVSUHOLPLQDU\DQGƄQDOGHVLJQSODQVIRUXUEDQDQGUXUDOURDGZD\VURXQGDERXWVDQGVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQV Her roadway design experience includes ADA, drainage, geometric design, concept analysis, and cost estimating using MicroStation, Geopak, Inroads, Storm CAD, and Corridor Modeler. Emily has worked with Greg on several municipal and county roadway projects and will assist Greg with the preparation of all plan submittals for this project. Project Experience z Bruce Vento Trail Final Design, Ramsey County, MN — Trail Design and Modeling Analyst. z CSAH 5 Phase 2 Pedestrian and Safety Improvements, Washington County, MN — ADA Design and Modeling Analyst. z Cleveland Avenue Reconstruction, Ramsey County, MN — ADA and Trail Design Analyst. z 5th Street Pedestrian Bridge over I-35W, Minneapolis, MN — ADA Design and Plan Production Analyst. z CSAH 13 Pedestrian Bridge over I-94, Washington County, MN — Plan Production Analyst. Matt Jensen, P.E. RETAINING WALL DESIGN 0DWWKDV\HDUVRIH[SHULHQFHSURYLGLQJSURMHFWPDQDJHPHQWDQGGHVLJQVHUYLFHVIRUVWUXFWXUDO engineering projects for local agencies. He is experienced with the design and construction of bridges DQGUHWDLQLQJZDOOVXWLOL]LQJ0Q'277UXQN+LJKZD\DQG6WDWH$LG6WDQGDUGV6SHFLƄFDOO\0DWWKDVVWURQJWHFKQLFDO experience with the preliminary design, layout, and wall type selection process to provide clients the most cost effective and constructible structures. Matt served the City of Arden Hills on the Elmer L. Anderson Memorial Trail connections project as structural engineer for the adjoining retaining walls. He also led the design and construction oversight for TH 5 Pleasantview, a project that had two different wall types needed to address unique project circumstances. Matt’s experience evaluating modular block and cast-in-place concrete will help to identify the scope of the retaining walls for this project. Project Experience z Elmer L. Anderson Memorial Trail Connections, Arden Hills, MN — Structural Engineer. z County Road E Bridge Pedestrian Improvements, Arden Hills, MN — Project Manager. z Old Snelling Bridge Rating and Reconstruction, Arden Hills, MN — Project Manager. z TH 5 Pleasantview Reconstruction, Chanhassen, MN — Structural Engineer. z Rice Creek Remeander Construction Phase Services, Ramsey County, MN — Structural Engineer. z Bruce Vento Trail Final Design, Ramsey County, MN — Structural Engineer. Ron Leaf, P.E. DRAINAGE DESIGN 5RQKDV\HDUVRIH[SHULHQFHDQGLVDVHQLRUZDWHUUHVRXUFHVHQJLQHHU+HKDVH[WHQVLYHH[SHULHQFH LQVWRUPZDWHUWUHDWPHQWIDFLOLW\DQGVWRUPVHZHUV\VWHPSUHOLPLQDU\HYDOXDWLRQVDQGƄQDOGHVLJQ comprehensive surface water management planning, and a wide range of stormwater green infrastructure practices. He is experienced in serving as the project manager and task leader for projects involving regional trails and linear projects adjacent to critical water resources. Project Experience z Rice Creek Remeander and Trail Improvements, Ramsey County, MN — Lead Water Resources Engineer. z Rice Creek Commons Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan & Green Infrastructure and Stormwater Reuse Feasibility Study, Arden Hills, MN — Lead Water Resources Engineer. RSRD06039.2020 8 z Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Engineering, Ramsey County, MN — Lead Water Resources Engineer. z Bruce Vento Trail Final Design, Ramsey County, MN — Lead Water Resources Engineer. Leila Bunge, AICP PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Leila brings experience as a planner in public engagement and environmental documentation for city, county, and state projects. She has facilitated a variety of public engagement activities aimed to be inclusive to a diverse group of stakeholders through community events, open houses, and stakeholder meetings. In addition to facilitating in-person meetings, Leila has created various forms of communication materials such as videos, interactive maps, and presentations and ensured they were accessible for online use. On her engagement projects, Leila has helped form strategic partnerships with other agencies and interest groups to increase the client’s outreach capacity and overall project awareness. Project Experience z Concord Street Improvements, South St. Paul, MN — Public Involvement Specialist. z CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Road/70th Street) Preliminary Design, Dakota County, MN — Public Involvement Specialist. z Red Rock Corridor Implementation Plan (BRT), Washington County, MN — Public Involvement Specialist. z TH 47 Saint Francis Pre-Design, Saint Francis, MN — Public Involvement Specialist. z Snelling Avenue Outreach, St. Paul, MN — Public Involvement Specialist. Blaine Marion, PLS SURVEY – PIONEER ENGINEERING %ODLQHKDV\HDUVRIH[SHULHQFHLQWKHƄHOGRIODQGVXUYH\LQJ+HKDVH[WHQVLYHH[SHULHQFHZULWLQJDQG interpreting legal descriptions, preparing topographic surveys, boundary surveys, ALTA/NSPS land title VXUYH\VSUHOLPLQDU\SODWVDQGƄQDOSODWV+HKDVPDQDJHGPXOWLSOHVXUYH\SURMHFWVIRUVWUHHWUHFRQVWUXFWLRQSULYDWH development, and public development projects including single family developments, commercial developments and infrastructure projects both new construction and reconstruction of streets, trails, sidewalks, parking lots, and utilities. Project Experience z Old Snelling Avenue Bridge Replacement, Arden Hills, MN — Survey Project Manager. z 3RUWODQG$YHQXH6WUHHW5HFRQVWUXFWLRQ5LFKƄHOG01 — Survey Project Manager. z CSAH 28/CSAH 63 (Argenta Trail) Preliminary Design, Inver Grove Heights, MN — Survey Project Manager. z Bidwell Street Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, West St. Paul, MN — Survey Project Manager. z Victoria Road Street Reconstruction, Mendota Heights, MN — Survey Project Manager. Matt Ruble, P.E. GEOTECHNICAL – AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING Matt serves as principal-in-charge and project manager for geotechnical and pavement consulting and construction services. He has provided geotechnical services for reconstruction and new alignment of roadway and trails, pedestrian bridges, pedestrian tunnels, bridges, and retaining walls. Project Experience z TH10 at Fairoak and Thurston Avenues, Anoka, MN — Geotechnical Lead. z CSAH 101 Reconstruction, Chaska, MN — Geotechnical Lead. z CSAH 101 Reconstruction and New Bridge, Wayzata, MN — Geotechnical Lead. z CR 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) Reconstruction, Eden Prairie and Chanhassen, MN — Senior Engineer. RSRD06039.20209E. PROJECT SCHEDULE2021 2022/2023TASK 1PROJECT COORDINATIONFeb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Fall 2021 Summer1.1Project Design Kickoff Meeting (NTP assumed Feb 1)X1.2Design Coordination Meetings (12)1.3Rice Creek Watershed District Meetings (2)XX1.4Ramsey County Meetings (2)XX1.5City Council Meetings (2)XXTASK 2PROJECT SURVEY2.1Project Survey, ROW boundaries, Utility One-Call, Project Base MapXTASK 3GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION3.1Geotechnical Investigation, Borings, Testing, and Recommendation MemoXTASK 4PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT4.1Public Informational Meeting and Materials (1 meeting)XTASK 5ALTERNATIVES REVIEW5.1Alternatives Design5.2Alternatives Review MeetingXTASK 6CONSTRUCTION PLANS6.13ODQVX6.23ODQVDQG23& -XQHVW6XEPLWWDO X6.33ODQVDQG23&X6.43ODQVDQG23& $XJXVWWK6XEPLWWDO XTASK 7EASEMENT DOCUMENTS7.1(DVHPHQW'UDZLQJVDQG/HJDO'HVFULSWLRQVRISURSHUWLHV -XQHVW6XEPLWWDO XTASK 8COUNTY COORDINATION8.1Cooperative Agreement Exhibits and TabulationXProject Manual and Bidding DocumentsConstruction RSRD06039.202010Total HoursPrincipal-in-ChargeProject ManagerStaff Engineer or PlannerGraduate Engineer or PlannerAdminSubconsultant (Survey)Subconsultant (Geotechnical and Environmental)Estimated FeesF. FEE TABLETotal HoursPrincipal-in-ChargeProject ManagerStaff Engineer or PlannerGraduate Engineer or PlannerAdminSubconsultant (Survey)Subconsultant (Geotechnical and Environmental)Estimated FeesTASK 1PROJECT COORDINATION1.1Project Design Kickoff Meeting2  1.2Design Coordination Meetings (12)21212 121.3Rice Creek Watershed District Meetings (2)   1.4Ramsey County Meetings (2) 12   1.5City Council Meetings (2)   Subtotal   000TASK 2PROJECT SURVEY2.1Project Survey, ROW Boundaries, Utility One-Call, Project Base Map  Subtotal000000TASK 3GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION3.1Geotechnical Investigation, Borings, Testing, and Recommendation Memo  Subtotal000000 TASK 4PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT4.1Public Informational Meeting and Materials (1 meeting) Subtotal000TASK 5ALTERNATIVES REVIEW5.1Alternatives Design250 505.2Alternatives Review Meeting2 2 $520Subtotal 122 252 50 0 0 0TASK 6CONSTRUCTION PLANS6.13ODQV      6.23ODQVDQG23&      6.33ODQVDQG23&      6.43ODQVDQG23&      6.5Project Manual (pending amendment)$0Subtotal0   00TASK 7EASEMENT DOCUMENTS7.1Easement Drawings and Legal 'HVFULSWLRQVRI3URSHUWLHV  Subtotal000000TASK 8COUNTY COORDINATION8.1Cooperative Agreement Exhibits and Tabulation12   Subtotal1200REIMBURSABLE EXPENSESSubtotalTOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT HOURS10255 250TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (FEES AND EXPENSES)$109,340 ATTACHMENT B MVHS Trail Improvements - Consultant Proposal Evaluation Ranking Criteria Maximum Possible Points Bolton & Menk Kimley Horn SRF Project Understanding/Approach: The proposal sufficiently describes the results to be achieved and provides a detailed outline of how they intend to achieve those results. 15 13 12 15 Team Qualifications: The consulting firm has proposed a team capable of completing all tasks within the project scope.25 23 24 25 Experience: The consultant has completed similar projects successfully.25 22 23 24 Cost: The proposal identifies a cost-effective and feasible solution.20 13 17 19 Schedule: The proposal includes all elements required for this project and is shown to be completed within the given dates.15 14 13 13 Total Points Available 100 85 89 96 Page 1 of 2 DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen (EIT), Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting a LRIP Grant Application for Lexington Avenue Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: Grant Application $1,250,000 State LRIP Funds Council Should Consider The City C ouncil is requested to consider adoption of Resolution 2021-007 supporting a Local Road Improvement Program grant application to the Minnesota Department of Transportation in the amount of $1,250,000 for the Lexington Avenue Improvement Project. Background/Discussion Ramsey County Public Works and the cities of Arden Hills and Shoreview have been working collaboratively for several years to prepare for the reconstruction of Lexington Avenue from Interstate 694 to County Road E. The project cost is estimated to be $12.5 million. The project was previously planned for construction in 2021, but was delayed to the year 2022 due to funding challenges at the County. Ramsey County Public Works is requesting the City’s support with an application to Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) grant program to potentially assist with funding the project. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has recently made $75 million of LRIP grant funds available statewide for 2021, 2022 and 2023 projects, with a cap of $1.25 million per project for Routes of Regional Significance. The County has requested that the cities of Arden Hills and Shoreview provide a Council resolution to support the grant application. A recommended resolution is provided in Attachment A. CONSENT ITEM – 6F MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact If successful, the LRIP grant would provide $1,250,000 in state funding to offset construction costs for roadway improvements. The project meets the definition of a Route of Regional Significance as outlined in the resolution and the grant application should score competitively against other competing projects. Staff recommends approval of the resolution in an effort to derive sufficient funds to complete the Lexington Avenue project in the year 2022. Grant funding would reduce county and city roadway construction costs, but cannot be used for engineering, inspections or utility coordination. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2021-007 Attachment B: Project Layout 1 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-007 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (LRIP) GRANT APPLICATION FOR LEXINGTON AVENUE WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has made $75 million of Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) grant funds available statewide for 2021, 2022 and 2023 projects, with a cap of $1.25 million per project; and WHEREAS, funding is available through the LRIP for the following three project categories: Routes of Regional Significance Account, Rural Road Safety Account and Trunk Highway Corridor Account; and WHEREAS, LRIP funds can be used on reasonable elements associated with roadway construction, but cannot be used for consultant engineering and inspection, utility coordination; and WHEREAS, construction costs above and beyond a LRIP award must be funded with alternate funding sources; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County, in cooperation with the Cities of Arden Hills and Shoreview is submitting a 2022 LRIP Routes of Regional Significance application request of $1.25 million for Lexington Avenue improvements extending from County Road E to Interstate 694; and WHEREAS, Lexington Avenue through the project area is a Route of Regional Significance due to its A-Minor Augmentor functional classification, its designation as a 10-ton CSAH route, its direct connection to Interstate 694, its function as a parallel reliever route to Trunk Highway 51 (Snelling Avenue) and its significant existing/forecasted AADT of 24,900/27,500; and WHEREAS, the Lexington Avenue project will consolidate access, add a raised center median throughout the corridor and left and right turn-lanes at major intersections, provide signal and intersection geometric upgrades, and improve bicycle/pedestrian facilities and transit stop locations; and WHEREAS, the Lexington Avenue project is expected to significantly reduce right-angle and rear end crashes, improve safety for bicycle, pedestrian and transit users and improve 2040 forecasted level of service (LOS) from E/F to LOS of D or better for the entire corridor; and 2 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. WHEREAS, the Lexington Avenue project will also provide significant economic development benefits providing improved mobility and access for regional attractions such as the City of Arden Hills Lexington Station Phase III development, the City of Shoreview Super Target and the City of St. Paul Como Zoo and Regional Park; and WHEREAS, Lexington Avenue project costs are expected to total approximately $12,485,000 and includes a combination of CSAH, local and State funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS supports Ramsey County’s submittal of the Lexington Avenue 2022 LRIP Routes of Regional Significance grant application. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021. ________________________________ Mayor Attest: ______________________________ City Clerk Ramsey County Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project Layout: County Road E to Interstate 694 Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6G MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Release of Previously Approved Planned Unit Developments and Termination of Declaration of Covenant Restrictions at 4200 Round Lake Road Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Release of previously approved Planned Unit Developments and termination of declaration of covenant restrictions at 4200 Round Lake Road. This items requires a simple majority. Background At its March 26, 2001, the Arden Hills City Council approved a Final Plat and Master Plan Planned Unit Development (PUD) application from Chesapeake Companies for the Subject Property at 4200 Round Lake Road (“Subject Property”) located at the northeast intersection Interstates 35W and 694 subject (Attachment A). At that time the Subject Property was subdivided into three (3) lots of record (Attachment B) and the City imposed restrictions that no building permits shall be issued unless all three (3) parcels were part of a PUD. The property owner at that time decided to create a private covenant that ran with the land to implement this condition of approval. Since then the Subject property had numerous PUD’s amendments and a lot consolidation occurred in 2007 where the three (3) lots were combined into one (1) parcel (Attachment B). The current request to terminate the private covenant should have occurred during the previous lot consolidation. At its October 12, 2020 meeting the City Council approved a Master Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Preliminary/Final Plat for Scannell Properties. The Page 2 of 2 approvals subdivide the subject parcel into two (2) new lots of record and permit the construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. The attorney for Scannell Properties has requested to clear title. The effect of the releases are to free the new parcel from any previously approved PUD’s and other restrictions previously recorded against the property. The recently approved PUD will govern the properties going forward. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the release of covenants on the condition that Scannell Properties executes and records the new PUD development agreement prior to the recording of the release document to ensure no gap in coverage occurs. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following motion language for this case. 1. Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of the release of previously approved Planned Unit Developments and termination of declaration of covenant restrictions at 4200 Round Lake Road on the condition that the new PUD Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded prior to the recording of the release document to ensure no gap in coverage occurs. 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of the release of previously approved Planned Unit Developments and termination of declaration of covenant restrictions at 4200 Round Lake Road: the City Council should identify findings to deny and should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 3. Table: Motion to table the release of previously approved Planned Unit Developments and termination of declaration of covenant restrictions at 4200 Round Lake Road. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. Location Map B. Subdivision Exhibit C. Release Document T„0V(`5 CE…` sSFdŠ9151?x|5:!|5d.8wv„5„ke›"g1G„ fl‹#@$U_y6/mz263a$tn{ˆ‘ƒ™6 D6Hœm;~36jKZ[††A%  gl‹*6UI&,]>r| hš3Oa @6l|oVPb W&€M64’6^$pp—}“š $˜$X\+QJ”‡7q|cY ’‰l<‹B6R=n€c$ŠNmiC7~6Liu”‚‡•)Œ‹l ‹'‹–7 –-Ž        Attachment A 20012007 $WWDFKPHQW% COVER SHEET This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. Attachment C CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS This Termination and Release of Declaration and Restrictions (“Release”) is made and entered into to be effective as of ____ day of January, 2020 (“Effective Date”) by NORTH AMERICAN LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“NALC”) and CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA (the “City”). RECITALS: A. NALC is the successor-in-interest to CMK Arden Holdings, a Minnesota limited partnership, Declarant under that certain Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions dated May 29, 2001 and recorded December 31, 2001 as Document No. 3456570 in the Office of the Recorder of Ramsey County, Minnesota (the “Declaration”), pursuant to which Declarant subjected the property (the “Property”) to certain restrictions that inure to the benefit of the owners of the Property and the City. B. NALC is the fee simple owner of the Property. C. The parties have agreed to terminate the Declaration as of the Effective Date and desire to release the Declaration as a matter of public record, on the terms and conditions more particularly set forth below. AGREEMENT: 1.Release of Declaration. For valuable consideration (the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged), the parties hereby release and terminate the Declaration. 2.Entire Agreement; Counterparts. This Release is intended to provide recorded notice of the termination of the Declaration. This Release may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same document. [Signature Pages Follow] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Termination and Release of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions as of the Effective Date. NALC: NORTH AMERICAN LAND COMPANY, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Nicholas S. Roberts, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Nicholas S. Roberts, President of North American Land Company, a Minnesota limited liability company, who acknowledged execution of the foregoing Termination and Release of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions as such officer acting for and on behalf of such entity. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _____ day of ____________________, 2020. My Commission No./Expiration _____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________ _____________________________________ My County of Residence: Printed ____________________ CITY: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA By: Printed: Title: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared ______________________________, the ______________________ of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, who acknowledged execution of the foregoing Termination and Release of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions as such officer acting for and on behalf of the City. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _____ day of _______________________, 2020. My Commission No./Expiration: _____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________ _____________________________________ My County of Residence: Printed ____________________ This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Julie M. Elliott, Esq., Krieg DeVault LLP, 12800 North Meridian Street, Suite 300, Carmel, Indiana 46032 KD_(13030817.1).docx Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6H MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: PC20-010 - Master Planned Unit Development Agreement with Scannell Properties Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • The Master Planned Unit Development Agreement with Scannell Properties based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 20-010 on October 12, 2020. This items requires a simple majority. Background At its October 12, 2020 meeting the City Council approved a Master Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Preliminary/Final Plat for Scannell Properties. The approvals subdivide the subject parcel into two (2) new lots of record and permit the construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. A Master PUD Agreement is required to be signed between the City and the developer before the issuance of development permits. The City Attorney has prepared the Agreement and the document has been reviewed and approved by the Applicant and staff (Attachment B). Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following motion language for this case. Page 2 of 2 1. Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of the Master Planned Unit Development Agreement with Scannell Properties based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 20-010 on October 12, 2020. 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of the Master Planned Unit Development Agreement with Scannell Properties based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 20-010 on October 12, 2020: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 3. Table: Motion to table Master Planned Unit Development Agreement with Scannell Properties based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 20-010 on October 12, 2020. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. Location Map B. Master Planned Unit Development Agreement T„0V(`5 CE…` sSFdŠ9151?x|5:!|5d.8wv„5„ke›"g1G„ fl‹#@$U_y6/mz263a$tn{ˆ‘ƒ™6 D6Hœm;~36jKZ[††A%  gl‹*6UI&,]>r| hš3Oa @6l|oVPb W&€M64’6^$pp—}“š $˜$X\+QJ”‡7q|cY ’‰l<‹B6R=n€c$ŠNmiC7~6Liu”‚‡•)Œ‹l ‹'‹–7 –-Ž        1 212751v1 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) GATEWAY INTERSTATE PC #20-010 THIS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is dated February 8, 2021, by and between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and SCANNELL PROPERTIES #486, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat and Planned Unit Development for GATEWAY INTERSTATE (referred to in this Contract as the “plat” and the “Development”). The Development is zoned GB, Gateway Business District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office. The land is situated in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as set forth on Exhibit A hereto (“Subject Property”). The Developer will construct a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. 2. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 2 212751v1 A. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Agreement, furnish the security required by it, and record this Agreement with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within ninety (90) days after the City Council approves the development agreement. B. The City hereby grants approval to the Development (identified as Plans C200 through EX in paragraph 7 of this Agreement); as adopted on October 12, 2020 by Resolution 2020-045, and compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other City requirements which are in effect. The specific conditions, requirements, and terms of approval are as set forth in City Resolution #2020-045 adopted by the Arden Hills City Council on the 12th day of October, 2020. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or subject property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat and this Agreement have been recorded with the Ramsey County Recorder's/Registrar’s Office within ninety (90) days of City Council approval, and 4) the City’s Administrator has issued a letter that the Developer may proceed. If the development agreement is not recorded within ninety (90) days of City Council approval, the approval shall be considered void. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. This plat is not part of a phased development. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. This plat is not part of a phased development. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat or approved development unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, 3 212751v1 official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement with respect to property which did not receive final plat or development approval less than two (2) years prior to any such amendments. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans (“Plans”). The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans will be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Agreement, but before commencement of any work in the plat or on the Subject Property. The erosion control plan may also be approved by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the approved plans shall control. The Plans are: C200 – Existing Conditions and Removals Plan C300 – Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Phase 1 C301 - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Phase 2 C400 – Site Plan C500 – Grading Plan C501 – Stormwater Management Plan C600 – Utility Plan C601 – Watermain Profile C602 – Watermain Profile C603 – Watermain Profile C604 – Watermain Profile C605 – Watermain Profile C700 – Civil Details L100 – Landscape Plan L101 – Landscape Enlargement – Northeast L102 – Landscape Enlargement – Southwest L103 – Landscape Enlargement – Southeast L104 – Landscape Details, Notes, & Schedule EX – 1 – Site Exhibit – Snow Storage, Truck Access, Future Parking 4 212751v1 8. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built within the project as private improvements in accordance with the approved Plans: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Parking Lots E. Streets, Alleys and Driveways F. Concrete Curb and Gutter G. Street lights H. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control I. Landscaping J. Underground Utilities K. Setting of Iron Monuments, including Monuments described in the Wetland Overlay District L. Surveying and Staking M. Sidewalks and Trails N. Traffic Control Signs The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City Code. The Developer will not use power equipment between the hours of 7 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for permit which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer which approval shall be provided on the condition that such submittals comply with the Plans and this Agreement. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work as the City may reasonably determine. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council 5 212751v1 chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 9. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. Upon completion of the public improvements, the City shall inspect the public improvements and notify Developer if any of the improvements do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement. Upon compliance with this Agreement with respect to public improvements, the City shall give formal notice of acceptance to Developer and thereafter Developer shall have no responsibility with respect to the maintenance of the public improvements, except during any warranty periods. The Developer shall, at its expense, prepare any streets for snowplowing and other maintenance that the Developer wishes the City to undertake prior to formal acceptance by the City of such streets. This preparation shall include, without limitations, ramping any manholes as necessary to avoid damage to snowplows or other vehicles used in street maintenance. Should damage occur to City snowplows or other vehicles during the course of snowplowing or other maintenance procedures prior to formal acceptance of the street by the City, the Developer shall pay all such damages and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless for all such damage, cost, or expense incurred by the City with regard thereto. 10. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all public improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of acceptance by the City against poor material and faulty workmanship. All trees and shrubs shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twenty-four (24) months after planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twenty-four (24) months from the time of planting. 11. IRON MONUMENTS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021 and Arden Hills City Code Section 1140.01 the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 6 212751v1 12. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to the following to the extent required: x City of Arden Hills for Street Access and Work in City Rights-of-Way x MnDot for State Highway Access and Drainage x Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains x MPCA for Storm Water, Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal x DNR for Dewatering x City of Arden Hills for Building Permits, Grading Permit, Water Connection and Sewer Connection Permits. 13. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer’s and the Developer’s contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 14. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall furnish and install all required public and private improvements in accordance with the City approved Plans by November 1, 2021.. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement must have the written approval of the City Engineer, and may be delayed or scheduled at any time of the year based upon existing site conditions at the discretion of the City Engineer. 15. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 16. STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL. The Developer shall provide for storm water facility improvements in accordance with the executed Stormwater Facilities Operation, Maintenance and Easement Agreement as provided in Exhibit B. Prior to initiating site grading, the 7 212751v1 erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within five (5) days after the completion of the work, weather permitting, or in an area that is inactive for more than ten (10) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development, street or utility construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 17. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading development and erosion control plan. The plan shall conform to City of Arden Hills specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches for public drainage have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may issue building permits to the Developer, prior to completion of all grading, provided the City Engineer has determined that adequate erosion control measures are in place. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations. The City will 8 212751v1 withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. 18. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates. Developer will provide a $4,500 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this developer/development. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates. 20. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, material, or others that work required by this Agreement has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, material, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Agreement. 9 212751v1 21. SANITARY SEWER CHARGES. The Development is subject to a charge for Sanitary Sewer Trunk in the estimated amount of $130,965.60 payable at the time of final plat approval. The estimated sanitary sewer charges are identified below. The sewer availability fee is determined based on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculating new sewer availability charge (SAC) units. The Developer shall apply to the Metropolitan Council for a SAC determination for the project. The Parties acknowledge that the following costs are estimates prepared prior to receiving a SAC unit determination from the Metropolitan Council, and final charges will be adjusted in accordance with the adopted fee schedule for the City of Arden Hills and number of SAC units. Sewer Connection Fee: $840.00/acre x 21.94 acres = $18,429.00 (City) Sewer Availability Fee: $825.00/unit x 34 units = $28,050.00 (City) Metro Sewer Availability Charge: $2,485/unit x 34 units = $84,490.00 (MCES) 22. WATER CHARGES. The Development is subject to a charge for Water supply in the estimated amount of $65,508.70 payable at the time of final plat approval. The estimated water charges are identified below. The water availability fee is determined based on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculating new sewer availability charge (SAC) units. The Developer shall apply to the Metropolitan Council for a SAC determination for the project. The Parties acknowledge that the following costs are estimates prepared prior to receiving a SAC unit determination from the Metropolitan Council, and final charges will be adjusted in accordance with the adopted fee schedule for the City of Arden Hills and number of SAC units. Water Connection Fee: $855.00/acre x 21.94 acres = $18,758.70 Water Availability Fee: $1,375.00/unit x 34 units = $46,750.00 23. STORM SEWER CHARGE. The Development is subject to charges for Storm Water review, approval and inspections by the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County Conservation District. 10 212751v1 24. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, STREET LIGHT AND STREET MAINTENANCE COSTS. Not Applicable. 25. PARK DEDICATION. The Developer will pay at the time of final plat approval, the amount of $230,910.00 in satisfaction of the City's park dedication requirements calculated as follows: 7.5% of the fair market value of the unimproved land approved by the City Council. 26. LANDSCAPING. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer will pay a landscape financial security in the amount of $50,000.00, which amount will be held by the City for two full growing seasons. Per the conditions of approval. Requirements in the City Council Staff Report dated October 12, 2020. 27. TREE PRESERVATION. See requirements in the City Council Staff Report dated October 12, 2020. 28. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to the development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in Resolution 2020-045 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for the Subject Property at 4200 Round Lake Road, adopted by the City Council on October 12, 2020. B. Implementation of the recommendations listed in Resolution No. 2020-045, for approval of the Final Plat. C. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the Memorandum from Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner to the Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator dated October 12, 2020. D. The Developer shall post a $2,500 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners and the placement of all monument. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. 11 212751v1 E. The Developer shall pay the cost for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading by the City Engineer as part of the Administrative / Engineering Fee. F. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be Auto CAD file. G. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City prior to installation of any signs for the development. 29. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of the costs of all improvements, and construction of all public and private improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow ("Security") in the amount of $1,387,387.50. The amount of the Security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Outside Utilities (installation of water main, sanitary sewer, storm drain and drain tile) $579,410.00 Erosion Control/Grading Certification $110,000.00 Streets, Parking Lots, and Interior Walks $408,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $1,097,410.00 OTHER COSTS: Tree Dedication Contribution $10,000.00 Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $2,500.00 OTHER COSTS SUB-TOTAL $12,500.00 TOTAL SECURITIES: $1,109,910.00 GRAND TOTAL SECURITIES (125%) $1,387,387.50 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for a term ending November 30, 2022. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are replaced at least 12 212751v1 thirty (30) days prior to their expiration. The City may draw down the security, upon five (5) business days prior written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts necessary to cure to the default. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied in accordance with approved plans, the security shall be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed and all financial obligations to the City satisfied. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 30. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Agreement which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval and execution of this Agreement by the City: Engineering, City Administration Engineering Expenses (Section 19) escrow $4,500.00 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge $137,589.60 Water Trunk Charge $68,258.70 Storm Sewer Charge $ Direct Charges Park Dedication and Improvements $230,910.00 Landscaping Security $50,000.00 Total Cash Requirements $491,258.30 The City is implementing a pass through billing process. The $491,258.30 escrow will be held and all bills will be forwarded for immediate payment. If payments are not made in a timely fashion, the project will stop until payments are made. If said fees are less than estimated, the City shall reimburse the Developer within thirty (30) days of receipt of final invoices. 13 212751v1 31. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Agreement, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat or property, or any part of it. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. E. In addition to the charges herein and special assessments referred to herein, other charges as required by City ordinance may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer access charges ("SAC"), water access charges, and building permit fees. 32. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty- eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary 14 212751v1 for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 33. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Subject Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. Any transfer of an ownership interest in the Subject Property is an assignment of the rights and obligations herein to the subsequent owner. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this Agreement. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. 15 212751v1 F. Developer will hold the City and its officers, agents, and employees harmless from claims made by third parties, including but not limited to other property owners, tenants, contractors, subcontractors, and materialmen, for damages sustained, costs incurred, or injuries resulting from approval of this Planned Unit Development and the development of the Subject Property unless such claims are caused by the City’s negligent, reckless or willful misconduct. The Developer will indemnify the City and its officers, agents, and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, including reasonable engineering and attorney's fees, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, except if caused by City negligence, reckless or willful misconduct. G. In addition to all legal or equitable remedies, breach of any material term of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits and Certificates of Occupancy. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The insurance may be provided by a single policy or multiple policies including excess of or umbrella policies and shall have limits for bodily injury and death not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $2,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policies, and the Developer shall file with the City a 16 212751v1 certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat or issuing any permits. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. J. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with at least one lift of bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer in writing. K. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. L. The Developer will pay in full all invoices submitted to it by the City within sixty (60) days after receipt which reasonably evidence those costs incurred in the drafting, enforcement and supervision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering, planning, and attorney's fees. If the invoices are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work until the invoices are paid in full. Invoices not paid within sixty (60) days shall be subject to an eight percent (8%) per annum interest charge. M Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from sidewalks on vacant lots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal from sidewalks on constructed homes. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City’s Code regarding nuisances. 17 212751v1 N Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls the development plans, or special conditions referred to in this Agreement required to be constructed shall be constructed before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 34. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council. This Development Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respected successors and assigns, including without limitation, any and all future and present owners, tenants, occupants, licensee, mortgagee and any other parties with any interest in the Property. Should the Developer convey any lot or lots in the Plat to a third party, the city and the owner of that lot or those lots may amend the Development or this Development Contract, with City approval, or use of those lots without the approval or consent of the other lot owners within the Plat. Private agreements between the owners of lots within the Plat for shared service or access and related matters necessary for the efficient use of the Property shall be the responsibility of the lot owners and shall not bind or restrict City authority to approve applications from any lot owner. 35. COUNTERPARTS. This Development Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 36. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 8801 River Crossing Boulevard, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240, with a copy to Scannell Properties, 294 Grove Lane, Suite 140, Wayzata, MN 55391. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112. 18 212751v1 [Signatures on the following pages.] 19 212751v1 Signature page to Development Contract and PUD Agreement [GATEWAY INTERSTATE PLAT] CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: _____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor (SEAL) By: _____________________________________ Dave Perrault, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of __________________, 20____, by David Grant and by Dave Perrault, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ Notary Public 20 212751v1 DEVELOPER: SCANNELL PROPERTIES #486, LLC By: ______________________________________ Marc Pfleging, Manager STATE OF INDIANA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF MARION ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of __________________, 2021, by Marc Pfleging, a Manager of Scannell Properties #486, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. ______________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 21 212751v1 EXHIBIT “A” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Interstate, Ramsey County, Minnesota as per plat thereof recorded December 23, 2020 as Document No. A04854667. 22 212751v1 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. PROJECT: ___________________________________________ CERTIFICATE HOLDER & ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Arden Hills ADDRESS: ARCH/ENGR:__________________________________________ INSURED:______________________________________ ADDRESS:___________________________________ ___________________________________ AGENT:________________________________________ ADDRESS:___________________________________ ___________________________________ WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE POLICY #______________________ EFFECTIVE DATE____/____/____ EXPIRATION DATE____/____/____ INSURANCE COMPANY:________________________________________ COVERAGE-Workers' Compensation, Statutory. Employers' Liability Limit $__________Each Accident $___________Disease Policy Limit $___________ Disease Employee Limit ($500,000 Policy limit applies to both accident and disease) GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY #______________________EFFECTIVE DATE____/____/____ EXPIRATION DATE____/____/____ INSURANCE COMPANY:________________________________________________ ( )Claims Made ( )Occurrence ( )Owner's & Contractors Protective ( ) Other LIMITS: General Aggregate Limit (Other Than Products-Completed Operations) $ ______________________ Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $ ______________________ Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $ ______________________ Each Occurrence $ ______________________ 23 212751v1 COVERAGE PROVIDED Operations of Contractor: Yes____ No____ Government Immunity is Waived Yes____ No____ Operations of Sub-Contractor (Contingent): Yes____ No____ Property Damage Liability Includes Does Personal Injury Include Damage Due to Blasting Yes____ No____ Claims Related to Employment: Yes____ No____ Damage Due to Collapse Yes____ No____ Completed Operations/Products: Yes____ No____ Damage To Underground Facilities Yes____ No____ Contractual Liability (Broad Form): Yes____ No____ Broad Form Property Damage Yes____ No____ EXCEPTIONS: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICY #________________________ EFFECTIVE DATE: ___/___/___ EXPIRATION DATE: ___/___/___ INSURANCE COMPANY: _______________________________________ ( )Any Auto ( )All Owned Autos ( )Scheduled Autos ( )Hired Autos ( )Non-Owned Autos LIMITS: Bodily Injury $_________ Each Person / $________ Each Occurrence OR Combined Single Limit $__________ Property Damage $_____________ Each Occurrence UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY #_____________________ EFFECTIVE DATE:____/____/____ EXPIRATION DATE:____/____/____ INSURANCE COMPANY_________________________________________ LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage $_______________Each Occurrence $__________________Aggregate COVERAGE PROVIDED: Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employers' Liability, General Liability, and Automobile Liability: Yes_____ No_____ Are any deductibles applicable to bodily injury or property damage on any of the above coverages? Yes_____ No_____ If So, List Amount $________________ AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE: Yes_____No_____ Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days notice to the parties to whom this certificate is issued. Dated at: ________________________ On: _______________________ By: ____________________________ MN License #________ Authorized Insurance Representative 24 212751v1 EXHIBIT “B” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1 STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 8th day of February, 2021, by and between Scannell Properties #486, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (the “Owner”) and the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). RECITALS A. The Owner is the fee owner of certain real property located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Owner Property"); and B. The Owner is proceeding to build on and develop the Owner Property, and has requested approval of a Site Plan (collectively “Plans”) for the proposed development at Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Interstate, Planning Case No.PC20-010; and D. The final Plans, which are expressly made a part hereof, as approved or to be approved by the City, provides for piping, detention and filtration stormwater facilities (collectively “Facilities”) as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto; and E. The City and the Owner agree that the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, require that on-site stormwater management facilities be constructed and maintained; and F. The City requires that the Facilities as shown on the Plans be constructed and adequately maintained by the Owner as a condition of final approval of the Plans. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 2 1. Construction of Stormwater Improvements. Owner shall construct the Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications identified in the Plan. 2. Maintenance of Stormwater Improvements. A. The Owner shall adequately maintain the Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the Stormwater Maintenance Plan and the City engineering standards for stormwater treatment facilities attached hereto as Exhibit D. This includes all pipes, channels, and other conveyances built to convey stormwater for the facility, as well as all structures, improvements, and vegetation provided to control the quantity and quality of the stormwater. Adequate maintenance is herein defined as good working condition so that these facilities are performing their design functions. B. The Owner will perform the work necessary to keep these Stormwater Facilities in good working order as appropriate. In the event a maintenance schedule for the Stormwater Facilities (including sediment removal) is outlined on the approved plans, the schedule will be followed and comply with all federal, state, and local regulations relating to the disposal of material. 3. Inspection and Reporting. The Owner shall cause the Stormwater Facilities to be inspected and submit an inspection report every two years to the City and shall be responsible for the payment of any associated costs. The purpose of the inspection is to assure safe and proper functioning of the facilities. The inspection shall cover the entire facilities, berms, outlet structure, pond areas, access roads, buffers, etc. Deficiencies shall be noted in the inspection report. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if it is not compliant with all requirements of the approved Plan and City engineering standards set forth in Exhibit D. 4. City Access and Maintenance Rights. A. The Owner hereby grants permission to the City, its authorized agents and employees, to enter upon the Owner Property and to inspect the stormwater management facilities during normal business hours (unless during an emergency that requires immediate access) as the City deems necessary. The City shall provide the Owner, its successors and assigns, copies of the inspection findings and a directive to commence with the repairs if necessary (“Inspection Report”). B. In the event the Owner, its successors and assigns, fails to maintain the Stormwater Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City and such failure continues for 60 days after the City gives the Owner written notice of such failure, the City may enter upon the Property and take whatever steps necessary, including excavation and the storage of materials and equipment, to correct deficiencies. The City's notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. The City may assess the City’s costs to the Owner’s property taxes, its successors and assigns. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said Stormwater Facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. In addition, Owner agrees that it is, and will be, solely responsible to address complaints and legal claims brought by any third party with regard 3 to the maintenance and operation from the Stormwater Facilities. The Owner expressly agrees to defend and hold the City harmless from any such third-party claim. 5. Grant of Easement. Owner hereby grants to the City, its successors and assigns, a permanent non-exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the Stormwater Facilities pursuant to the terms of this Agreement over, on, across, under and through the Easement Area as described in Exhibit C. The easement shall include the rights, but not the obligation, of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said private Stormwater Facilities together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Easement Area, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said private Stormwater Facilities systems. 8. Reimbursement of Costs. The Owner agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. 9. Indemnification. This Agreement imposes no liability of any kind whatsoever on the City. The Owner hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the Owner or the Owner’s agents or employee's negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Owner to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Owner’s required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts. 10. Insurance. The Owner shall maintain its own policies of public liability insurance with regard to the use of the City Property by Owner, its respective officers, agents, employees, members, invitees, contractors and assigns. 11. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by certified or registered mail and addressed as follows: To the Owner: Scannell Properties, LLC 294 Grove Lane, Suite 140 Wayzata, MN 55391 Attn: Tim Elam To the City: City of Arden Hills Attention: City Administrator 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 4 All notices given hereunder shall be deemed given when personally delivered or two business days after being placed in the mail properly addressed as provided herein. 12. Successors/Covenants Run with Property. All duties and obligations of Owner under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Owner’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Properties. PROPERTY OWNER: SCANNELL PROPERTIES #486, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company By: Marc D. Pfleging, Manager STATE OF INDIANA ) )ss. COUNTY OF MARION ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2021, by Marc D. Pfleging, a Manager of Scannell Properties #486, LLC, on behalf of said entity. Notary Public CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2019, by David Grant and Dave Perrault, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public 5 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Owner Property Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Interstate Ramsey County, Minnesota 6 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT Insert Depiction of Facilities 7 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of Easement Area 8 203267v1 EXHIBIT D TO STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT STORMWATER FACILITY INSPECTIONS The Owner, at its expense, shall be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of stormwater drainage and management facilities (Facilities) located on the Property or directly associated with the property improvements to ensure Facilities function properly in accordance with standards established by the City of Arden Hills, Rice Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Owner shall inspect the Facilities at least every two years and submit a written inspection report to the Arden Hills City Engineer for review. Owner shall promptly complete maintenance and repairs to the Facilities based on finding from the annual inspection or as directed by the City Engineer. Inspections shall be completed by a qualified person with formal training and education in the design and maintenance of stormwater management practices. A summary of inspector qualifications shall be provided with the annual report. Stormwater facility inspections shall include, but are not limited to, the following items. 1. Access: Adequate access is provided for inspection, maintenance, and landscaping upkeep, including the ability to access areas by appropriate equipment and vehicles. 2. Sediment Removal: Accumulated sediment is removed every seven years or after sediment volume has exceeded design perameters. 3. Vegetation: Mowing of the pond buffer, shoreline or base elevation, and the embankment is completed a minimum of once per year. All areas of bare soil and erosive gullies are repaired and stabilized. All noxious weeds are treated and/or removed from the Facility area. 4. Debris: All trash, litter and debris is removed from within the 100-year high water level of the facility, including fallen trees, limbs and other floatable materials. 5. Infiltration: The surface of infiltration areas are free of accumulated sediment and continue to provide the design infiltration and permeability rates in accordance with the original hydraulic design. Standing water does not exist after 24 hours following a rain event. Subsurface drainage pipes are free of debris and are not clogged with material. 6. Conveyance and Outlet Works: Inlet pipes, outlet pipes, outlet control devices and emergency overflow paths are free of debris or other potential blockages. Pipes and structures are secured and show no signs of significant deterioration or damage. Trash guards are secured and free of blockage. Rip rap and energy dissipation items are maintained in proper working order in accordance with design requirement. 7. Embankments: Areas of embankment are inspected to identify instability, including cracks, horizontal or vertical movement, slope failure, or seepage. Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 6I MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Resignation of Public Works Director/City Engineer Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $N/A $N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • The resignation of the Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background The Public Works Director/City Engineer submitted their resignation with a last day February 5, 2021. Budget Impact N/A Attachments N/A Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6J MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Appointment of Interim Public Works Director Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $N/A $N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Appoint David Swearingen to the position of Interim Public Works Director with an additional interim pay of 10% of his normal salary during the interim period. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background The City has a vacancy for its Public Works Director/City Engineer following the resignation of its previous director. The City Council will consider at a future date on how to best move forward with filling the position longer-term, however, it is recommended the City Council appoint David Swearingen to fill the duties of the Public Works Director at least in the short- term. Note, this is only for Public Works Director functions. The City will need to utilize a consultant for official City Engineering work, as well as, other technical work as needed. The consultant is required as Mr. Swearingen does not yet possess his P.E. license, which would be required to be the Engineer of Record for the City. An approval for consultant services will be presented to Council as a separate approval. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact This will not adversely affect the budget as any increases in cost to the City due to the interim pay will be absorbed by the vacancy left by the previous Public Works Director/City Engineer. Attachments N/A Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6K MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Proposal from Bolton and Menk for On-Call City Engineer Services and designating Bolton and Menk as the Engineer of Record Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $N/A $N/A General and Utility Funds Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • A proposal with Bolton and Menk for on-call engineering services for the City and designating Bolton and Menk as the Engineer of Record for the City. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background The City has a vacancy for its Public Works Director/City Engineer following the resignation of its previous director. Under a separate item, the City Council is asked to consider appointing David Swearingen to the position of Interim Public Works Director. Mr. Swearingen does not have the necessary license to be the Engineer of Record for the City, so the City will need to utilize a consultant for this function. Bolton and Menk provided the City with a proposal for services (see Attachment A). The rates provided by Bolton and Menk are competitive with rates the City has previously received for engineering services. Bolton and Menk will provide services at the discretion of the City Administrator and Interim Public Works Director on an as-needed basis. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact It is difficult to gauge the budget impact of engineering services as they will be done on an as- needed basis, however, any costs for services will be off-set by the Public Works Director/City Engineer vacancy. Attachments Attachment A: Proposal for Engineering Services by Bolton and Menk proposal on call ce services.docx February 1, 2021 Dave Perrault, MBA, MPA City Administrator City of Arden Hills dperrault@cityofardenhills.org RE: City Engineering Services Dear Mr. Perrault: Thank you for requesting a proposal from Bolton & Menk, Inc. to provide on-call city engineering services for the city. We look forward to the opportunity to assist city staff with necessary day-to-day engineering services. I understand, as a result of recent staffing changes, there is a need for assistance with day-to-day engineering needs that arise or requests that come in from property owners or developers. Assistance may include some or all of the following: • Provide project management and coordination for the City’s 2021 PMP Improvement Project (assessment roll preparation, public notification, etc.); • Provide professional engineering oversight, review, of plan reviews and feasibility memos; • Assist the interim PWD as requested. We will bill the City at the hourly rate per assigned staff member for work completed. Where appropriate, we will utilize an experienced EIT (avg hourly rate $125), with oversight from myself (hourly rate $178) or another project manager. We have P.E’s with varying levels of experience and expertise available as needed with hourly rates ranging from $130-$199/hour. We will continue to utilize Nick Amatuccio & myself for project management and coordination needs for the 2021 PMP Improvement Project. We understand this work will be on an as-needed basis. At this time, we do not anticipate that one of our engineer’s will be at City Hall, if this is of interest, or is determined to be needed in the future, we are happy to discuss this. Please contact me at 612-756-3427 or at sarah.lloyd@bolton-menk.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sarah E. Lloyd, P.E. Principal Engineer Page 1 DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall HVAC Project Payment No. 2 to Air Express Budgeted Amount: Cost to Date: Funding Source: $303,800 $25,365 of $280,783 Building/Equipment Fund Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Payment No. 2 to Air Express for the City Hall HVAC Project in the amount of $11,875 All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Discussion On October 12, 2020, the City Council awarded the City Hall HVAC Project to Air Express in the amount of $268,560.00 (an additional five percent contingency ($12,223) was built into the project for a total project cost of $280,783). The contractor is requesting payment, less five percent ($625) in retainage, in the amount of $11,875. The City’s engineering consultant, Paulson and Clark, has reviewed and agrees with the payment request. Previous payments made to the contractor and the requested payment are below: Payment #Work Completed Retainage Payment Payment #1 14,200$ 710$ 13,490$ Payment #2 12,500$ 625$ 11,875$ Total to date 26,700 1,335 25,365 Budget Impact This payment is inline with the expected cost of the project and will not have an adverse effect on the budget. Attachment Attachment A: Application and Certificate for Payment CONSENT ITEM – 6L MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 8 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – 10A MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Mike Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 20-022 Applicant: Arden Hills RE, LLC Property Location: 2 Pine Tree Drive Unfinished Business: Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following for Planning Case 20-022 for Arden Hills RE, LLC proposed development at 2 Pine Tree Drive: • Planned Unit Development (PUD) (4 / 5 vote needed for action) • Site Plan All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background The City Council previously discussed Planning Case 20-022 at their meeting on January 25, 2021. At that time the City Council approved the associated Conditional Use Permit and Zoning Code Amendment. However, the action to approve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Site Plan was tabled to allow staff time to work with the Applicant on providing the cross parking agreement with Bethel University, and supporting documentation regarding the Applicant’s proposal to meet the intent of the tree preservation ordinance. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The Subject Property is zoned B-2, General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. Page 2 of 8 Plan Evaluation A PUD proposal shall identify any requested modifications from the applicable zoning requirements as well as the reasons why the modifications would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the B-2 District. Modifications to these requirements may be granted by the City without a variance through the PUD process. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the City Council on January 25, 2021. The following paragraphs focus on unfinished business related to Planning Case 20-022. Parking: The submitted site plans indicate 66 surface parking stalls and 29 enclosed parking stalls for a total of 95. Parking requirements for senior living facilities are unique as not all tenants own vehicles. The intention is to regulate senior independent, staff and visitor parking. The Applicant provided staff with supporting documents that explain how they determine parking needs for their facilities. The Applicant created a formula to determine the parking needs of their proposed facilities based on review of existing site operations. The Applicant has applied the formulas for its parking needs, as it has proved successful in their last 6 communities. The table below summarizes the City’s parking requirements and the Applicants parking formulas. Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Per City Ordinance Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency Residential Facility NA 45 95 -107 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls) 75 81 2 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls) 38 76 Total 113 202 New Perspective Senior Living Parking Total Resident Parking Required 60 Total Staff Parking Required 34 Visitor Parking 14 Total Parking Stalls Required 108 Number of Stalls Provided 95 Parking Deficiency: -13 The proposed site plan has 95 parking stalls and has a deficit of 13 stalls when using the applicants parking formula. In response to the parking deficiency onsite, the Applicant has contacted Bethel University and discussed a cross parking agreement for additional parking stalls. The Applicant has provided staff with a non-executed parking license agreement (Attachment B). The agreement allows for up to 25 visitor vehicles to park on Bethel’s property on weekends and holidays. The proposed 95 parking stalls and the additional 25 cross parking Page 3 of 8 stalls or 120 total should adequately support the proposed use per the applicants formula. As a condition of approval the Applicant is required to provide the cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for City Council approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. Tree Preservation During the January 25, 2021 meeting the City Council requested additional information from the Applicant showing how they came up with their requested $20,000 fee-in-lieu of tree replacement. The summary can be found in Attachment F. The pricing was based on quantity and species type of existing trees on site, matched with the replacement cost of commercially available trees and not by caliper inch as required by ordinance. Below is breakdown of the costs: Tree Pricing • Cottonwood: 57 trees x $153 • Boxelder: 29 trees x $153 • Willow: 9 trees x $153 • Sugar Maple: 1 tree x $500 • Red Oak: 1 tree x $500 • American Elm: 1 tree x $500 = $16,035 x 110% = $17,639 City Code Section 1325.055 outlines the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Applicant submitted a tree inventory and preservation plan with replacement calculations. Upon further review of the previous tree replacement calculations it appears the Applicant included trees that are considered nuisance trees that should not be included in the tree replacement calculations (Attachment C). The report included trees that were identified by the tree surveyor as dead, dying, in poor or critical condition. Below is the description used by the tree surveyor to identify what trees considered in poor, critical or dead condition. A. Poor – a poor tree has significant problems that are irrecoverable. B. Critical – a tree is almost dead and shows a live crown less than 20%. C. Dead – a dead tree shows no sign of life. In response the Applicant has revised their tree inventory and preservation plan (Attachment D). The revised plan shows the removal of the nuisance trees reducing the overall existing significant caliper inches from 3,837 to 3,593. In addition, the Applicant is proposing to preserve an additional 38 caliper inches of existing trees onsite for a total 748 caliper inches. The Applicant is proposing to remove 2,845 caliper inches or 115 trees. The ordinance allows removal of ten (10) percent without replacement or 284.5 caliper inches. Removal of the remaining 2,560.5 caliper inches of trees requires mitigation at a ratio of 1:2 replacement, or 1,280.28 caliper inches. However, ordinance allows for trees to be planted onsite as shown on the landscaping plan to subtracted from the required mitigation. The Application is proposing to plant 187 trees, with a total of 564 caliper inches. The total required replacement is 716.25 caliper inches. Page 4 of 8 In addition, City Code section 1325.05 Subd. 5, (B) allows the City Council the ability to reduce the tree mitigation requirement when there is greater public good such as; 1. Allowing for LEED Certified architectural practices 2. Providing affordable housing 3. Allowing for a public road or trail 4. Providing for a public utility service The submitted site plan shows a proposed public trail along the eastern and southern sides of the subject property and shown on Attachment E. This will create a connection to the existing trails on the Anderson Center. The Applicant also added additional sidewalks to allow for looping around the principle structure per the request of the City Council at their July 20, 2020 meeting. According to the tree inventory and preservation plan the total caliper inches removed for public good is 324 caliper inches. If Council elects to allow the Applicant to reduce the 324 caliper inches it reduces the total replacement from 716.25 to 570 caliper inches. It is worth noting that a smaller replacement ratio does require fewer trees to be planted than if the ratio was greater, but over time the new trees will grow to maturity and there will be many more trees on the property than before the removal took place. For example, if 40 inches of trees are required to be replaced, a one to one ratio would require that 20 two-inch trees are planted, far more trees than were likely on the site before. The Applicant is also proposing that Ash trees not be counted in the tree mitigation as the tree is not planted anymore due the threat of the Emerald Ash Borer. Historically city staff has not recommended that Ash species not be used in required landscape plans as part of a development application. The Applicant is requesting that the 281 caliper inches of Ash trees not be counted towards tree replacement requirements. The Applicants breakdown and rationale for the requested flexibility can be found in Attachment F. Page 5 of 8 Table 1 Original Plan Applicants Revised Plan Ordinance Requirements Existing Significant Caliper Inches 3,837 3,593 3,593 Remaining Caliper Inches 710 748 748 Inches removed for public good (Public trail, utility service) - 324 324** Ash Tree Removal* - 281* - Proposed Significant Tree Removal 3,127 2,240 2,521 Allowable Removal (10%) 312.7 224 252.1 Removal Requiring Mitigation 2,811 2016 2,268.9 Mitigation Requirement (1” for each 2” removed) 1,405 1,008 1134.45 Proposed Plantings 564 564 564 Replacement Required 841 444 570 Table 1 – Tree mitigation and replacement summary * The Applicant is requesting Ash trees not be counted towards the required replacement. **City Code allows the City Council the ability to reduce the tree mitigation requirement when there is greater public good City Code section 1325.055 Subd 5 states that the Applicant is required to replace removed trees with trees of a species similar to the trees which are lost or removed (Attachment G). If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. The fee in lieu amount shall be the cost of materials and installation tree, plus ten (10) percent. As a condition of approval, prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off- site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. Discussion The Applicant previously requested flexibility to pay $20,000 fee in lieu of replacement. According to the report submitted by Applicant (Attachment F) the replacement required is 444 caliper inches or $50,958.60. It’s worth noting that this total was arrived at by not counting Ash trees as replaceable trees and replacing removed trees with the same tree species. Council shall provide direction on if they want to allow the Applicant flexibly or require the Applicant submit the total replacement. Council shall consider The following is motion language options for the City Council to consider. Planned Unit Development approvals require a supermajority (four affirmative votes). Page 6 of 8 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of a Planned Unit Development and Site Plan for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. Page 7 of 8 In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University, the owner of Outlot A, permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University, the owner of Outlot A, permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department, the owner of Lot 2, Block 1, on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County and MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total surety shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Page 8 of 8 Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development and Site Plan for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the report to the City Council. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of the Planned Unit Development and Site Plan for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the following findings of fact: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 20-022 for the Planned Unit Development and Site Plan for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive for the following reasons: the City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 23, 2020. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by February 21, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the Petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the Applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. Location Map B. Parking License Agreement C. Original Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan D. Revised Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan E. Pedestrian Access Plan F. New Perspective Senior Living Tree Inventory and Preservation Report G. City Code Section 1325.055 Subd. 6 Approved Tree Mitigation. H. City Council PowerPoint Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN Statute 466.03 Subd 21. Location Map Highway 51Tiller Lane County Road E West Glenarden RoadPine Tree DriveHarri e t A v e n u e Skiles Lane B e n t o n W a y Forest Lane Arden Place NB Hwy 51 To CO RD ECannon AvenueGlenarden CourtConnelly Av e n u e Dellwood AvenueHighway 51Benton Way ± §¨¦35W §¨¦694 £¤10 Subject Parcel Park and Open Space Attachment A 1 PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is dated as of ____________, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), between BETHEL UNIVERSITY, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (“Licensor”), and BOLDT COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation (“Licensee”). RECITALS A. Licensor is the owner of certain real property located at 2 Pine Tree Drive, Arden Hills, Minnesota (the “Property”), where Licensor maintains a parking lot for its use. B. Licensee intends to build a senior residence building on real property it is purchasing from BETHEL UNIVERSITY, which property lies adjacent to BETHEL UNIVERSITY’S property at 2 Pine Tree Drive in Arden Hills, Minnesota. C. Licensor wishes to grant to Licensee an exclusive license to use a specific portion of the parking lot on Licensor’s Property, [which area will be defined after the senior building has been built] as described on Exhibit A attached hereto, (the “License Area”) as an overflow visitor parking lot, for use on weekends and holidays, for vehicular parking purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, Licensor and Licensee agree as follows: 1. License. Licensor hereby grants to Licensee an exclusive license to use the License Area of the parking lot (to be designated when the senior building is built) for up to 25 cars, on weekends and holidays, for use by visitors, and not for use by residents of the building or by Licensee’s employees, contractors or other person (the “License”). 2. Use. Licensee’s use of the parking lot shall be subject to such rules and regulations as may be promulgated by Licensor from time to time. Licensee shall use the parking lot only for the parking of standard passenger vehicles, and for no other purposes. Licensee’s use of the parking lot shall at all times conform to all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes. 3. Term. The License created hereby shall be of indefinite duration but it may be terminated by the Licensor upon ninety (90) days written notice to Licensee. 4. License Fee. As consideration for this Agreement and the License granted hereby, Licensee shall by a fee to Licensor of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per month (the “License Fee”), payable quarterly in advance for so long as this Agreement is in effect. The Licensee Fee may be adjusted by the Licensor in its sole discretion from time-to-time upon ninety (90) days written notice to Licensee. 5. Rights Reserved By Licensor. Licensor reserves all rights with respect to the License Area, not specifically and exclusively granted to Licensee under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the right to: (a) Tow away, or otherwise impound, at the vehicle owner’s sole cost and expense, any vehicle (i) improperly parked on the License Area or parked outside of the License Area on the Property; (ii) parked in a "no parking" zone; or (iii) parked in violation of any state or local law; $WWDFKPHQW% 2 (b) Close all or any part of the Property (and deny Licensee’s access to the License Area as reasonably necessary in connection with any repairs made by Licensor to the Property or in the event of any emergency, without liability or cost to Licensor; (c) From time to time, upon not less than three (3) days’ prior written notice to Licensee, temporarily deny Licensee the use of all or a portion of the Licensed Area of the parking lot when same are needed to accommodate Licensor’s own use for special events held at the Property or other real property owned by Licensor; and (d) Make any change to the designated area of the License Area, which Licensor deems necessary or desirable in its sole discretion; provided that such change does not materially and adversely impact Licensee’s ability to use the Licensed Area in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 6. Modification. If Licensor wishes to materially modify or alter the Property in connection with a sale, expansion, redesign or development of the Property, Licensor shall consult with Licensee concerning Licensor’s plans for such modification or alteration and Licensee may provide reasonable feedback on Licensor’s plans; provided, however, Licensee’s consent to such plans shall be required. 7. Insurance. Licensee agrees to maintain general commercial liability insurance covering claims for personal injury, death and property damage occurring on or about the License Area of the parking lot with policy limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Upon request from Licensor, Licensee shall provide Licensor with a certificate or other reasonable evidence of such liability insurance. 8. Indemnification. Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Licensor from any and all claims, liabilities, causes of action or costs (including attorneys’ fees and costs of suit), however caused, to the extent they arise out of or are alleged by Licensor or third parties to arise out of Licensee’s use of the License Area or the parking lot. 9. Release. Licensee hereby waives and releases any and all claims against Licensor for the interruption or interference in the use of the License Area, or for any damage to any vehicles or other property located on or about the License Area or the Property from any cause whatsoever. 10. Transfer. Licensee shall not assign or transfer this Agreement, or the License created hereby, in whole or in part or permit any other party to use the Licensed Area under any arrangement, without the prior written consent of Licensor. 11. Default. Licensor may terminate this Agreement upon notice to Licensee if: (a) Licensee breaches Sections 1 or 2 of this Agreement three (3) times (each time requiring notice from Licensor regarding such breach); (b) Licensee breaches Sections 4 or 9 of this Agreement; or (c) Licensee fails to perform any of its obligations set forth herein or breaches this Agreement and such failure or breach is not cured within thirty (30) days following written notice to Licensee thereof. 3 If Licensee fails to cure the breach in Sections 1 or 2 of this Agreement within 10 days, the continued breach will count as an additional breach. The failure to cure for an additional 10 days beyond the first 10 day period will also count as an additional breach. 12. Notices. All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals and other instruments required or permitted to be given pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by overnight express courier, or delivered by hand, in each case addressed to Licensor or Licensee at its addresses set forth below: If to Licensor: BETHEL UNIVERSITY Attn: Mark Posner 3900 Bethel Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 If to Licensee: THE BOLDT COMPANY Attn: Alex Brewer Development Manager 1110 N. Old World Third St. Suite 610 Milwaukee, WI 53203 13. Severability. Every covenant and agreement contained in this Agreement is separate and independent, and the breach of any thereof by Licensor shall not discharge or relieve Licensee from any obligation hereunder. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall at any time be invalid and unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances or at any time other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforced to the extent permitted by law. 14. Choice of Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the procedural and substantive laws of the State of Minnesota without giving effect to any choice of law principles which might provide for application of a different jurisdiction’s law. Any claim or action brought by one of the parties hereto in connection with this Agreement shall be brought in Minnesota District Court located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and Licensee expressly agrees to be subject to the personal jurisdiction of said court as a material term of this Agreement. 15. No Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto and their respective successors. Neither party may, or shall have the power to, assign this Agreement, and/or any rights and/or obligations hereunder without the written consent of the other party. 16. Waiver. At no time shall any failure or delay by either party in enforcing any provisions, exercising any right or option, or requiring performance of any provisions, be construed to be a waiver of same. A waiver by either of the parties of any of the covenants to be performed by the other or any breach 4 thereof shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach thereof or of any other covenant herein contained. 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter contained in this Agreement and supersedes all previous agreements. 18. Amendment. No change, modification, amendment, supplement to or waiver of this Agreement (or any provisions hereof) shall be binding upon the parties unless made in writing and duly signed by both parties. 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above set forth. LICENSOR: BETHEL UNIVERSITY a Minnesota nonprofit corporation By: Name: Title: LICENSEE: THE BOLDT COMPANY a Wisconsin corporation By: ________________________________ Name: ______________________________ Its: _________________________________ 5 EXHIBIT A LICENSE AREA DESCRIPTION PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSSNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPPRIVATE DRIVEABBBBBBBCC18318477797887807675747360615958628584888672716564636970575668551868182839695949392919098666753545251494836991001011031041051063530343332312827291171161081091101111121131231221141151211191201241251261271281421351331291301321311361341411181371391402322212019181714314414814714614514915115215315415516116015915715815616516917516416216316716816617217117317417617997185187188189242526434445464750138150414217717818018118289Genus, SpeciesCommonRemoved Condition17Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD18Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD19Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD20Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD21Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD22Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD23FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 34 YES GOOD24FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 24 YES POOR25Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES POOR26Salix spp.Willow 16 YES POOR27Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YES GOOD28Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD29FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 16 YES GOOD30Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD31Populus deltoidesCottonwood 24 YES GOOD32Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD33Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD34Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD35Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD36Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES GOOD41Acer negundoBoxelder 22 YES DEAD42Acer negundoBoxelder YES DEAD43Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES POOR44Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES POOR45Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES POOR46Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES POOR47Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES POOR48Salix spp.Willow22YESFAIR49Salix spp.Willow 38 YES GOOD50Acer negundoBoxelder 104 YES POOR51Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR52Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD53Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD54Acer negundoBoxelder 46 YES GOOD55Populus deltoidesCottonwood 64 YES GOOD56Populus deltoidesCottonwood 70 YES GOOD57Populus deltoidesCottonwood 60 YES GOOD58Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YES GOOD59Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES GOOD60Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD61Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD62Populus deltoidesCottonwood 44 YES GOOD63Acer negundoBoxelder 34 YES GOOD64FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD65Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD66Acer negundoBoxelder 14 YES GOOD67FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YES GOOD68Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YES GOOD69Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES FAIR70Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD71Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YESFAIR72FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 10 YES GOOD73Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR74Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR75Populus deltoidesCottonwood 56 YES GOOD76Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD77FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash22YESFAIR78Populus deltoidesCottonwood42YES GOOD79Salix spp.Willow 18 YESFAIR80FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 20 YES FAIR81Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR82FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 12 YES FAIR83Populus deltoidesCottonwood 72 YES FAIR84FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 12 YES FAIR85FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 14 YES GOOD86Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES GOOD87Salix spp.Willow 22 YES GOOD88FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 14 YES FAIR89Salix spp.Willow 18 YES CRITICAL90Acer negundoBoxelder 32 YES FAIR91FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash11YES FAIR92Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR93Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YESFAIR94Acer negundoBoxelder14YESFAIR95Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR96Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR97Acer negundoBoxelder 22 YES FAIR98Acer negundoBoxelder 12 YES FAIR99FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 22 YES GOOD100 Acer saccarhaumSugar maple12YESEXCELLENT101Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES EXCELLENT103FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR104Populus deltoidesCottonwood42YESFAIR105Quercus rubraRed oak14YES GOOD106Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD108Salix spp.Willow 26 YESFAIR109Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR110Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YESFAIR111Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YESFAIR112Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES FAIR113 Ulmus americana American elm 12 YES FAIR114Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YES GOOD115FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD116FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 22 YES FAIR117Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD118Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD119Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD120Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD121Populus deltoidesCottonwood 25 YESFAIR122Populus deltoidesCottonwood22YES FAIR123Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES FAIR124Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES FAIR125Populus deltoidesCottonwood 40 YESFAIR126Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 YESFAIR127Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR128Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YESFAIR129Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES FAIR130Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YES FAIR131Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES GOOD132Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD133Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES FAIR134Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YES FAIR135Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES FAIR136Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES GOOD137Populus deltoidesCottonwood 61 YESFAIR138Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 YES POOR139Populus deltoidesCottonwood 37 YESFAIR140Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YESFAIR141Salix spp.Willow 16 YES GOOD142FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR143Salix spp.Willow42NOFAIR144Salix spp.Willow 14 NO FAIR145Populus deltoidesCottonwood24NOFAIR146Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NOFAIR147Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NOFAIR148Populus deltoidesCottonwood24NOFAIR149Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 NO FAIR150Salix spp.Willow 18 YES POOR151Populus deltoidesCottonwood21NO GOOD152Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD153Populus deltoidesCottonwood 22 YES GOOD154Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NO FAIR155Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD156Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 YES GOOD157Populus deltoidesCottonwood 21 NO GOOD158Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 NO GOOD159Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 NO GOOD160Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 NO GOOD161Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NO GOOD162Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD163Populus deltoidesCottonwood 20 NO GOOD164Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NO GOOD165Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD166Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 NO GOOD167Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 NO GOOD168Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 NO GOOD169Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 NO GOOD171Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 NO GOOD172Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD173Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD174Populus deltoidesCottonwood 55 NO GOOD175Populus deltoidesCottonwood12NO GOOD176Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NO GOOD177Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES DEAD178Populus deltoidesCottonwood 17 YES DEAD179Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES CRITICAL180Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD181Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD182Populus deltoidesCottonwood 12 YES DEAD183Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD184Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD185Salix spp.Willow 21 YES GOOD186Salix spp.Willow 36 YES GOOD187Acer spp. Maple27 NO GOOD188Acer spp. Maple22 YES GOOD189Salix spp.Willow 16 YES GOODGenus, SpeciesCommonRemoved ConditionThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Boldt\arden hills senior living\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg December 23, 2020 - 3:59pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORTREE INVENTORYANDPRESERVATIONPLANC200ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNTREE TO BE REMOVEDPROPERTY LINETREE TO REMAINLEGENDTREE PROTECTIONSIGNFURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINEOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRIP LINE1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORTWILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY.3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITYHAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ONTREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES.4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHINDISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS.5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTALAUTHORITY.6. SIGNIFICANT TREE. A TREE THAT IS IMPORTANT TO THE SITE AND THE NEIGHBORHOODCHARACTER, THAT IS STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND HEALTHY, AND THAT MEETS AT LEASTONE OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:x A DECIDUOUS HARDWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TEN (10) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IRONWOOD, CATALPA, OAK, HARD MAPLE, WALNUT,HICKORY, BIRCH, BLACK CHERRY, HACKBERRY, LOCUST AND BASSWOOD.x A DECIDUOUS SOFTWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TWELVE (12) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COTTONWOOD, POPLARS/ASPEN, BOX ELDER,WILLOW, SILVER MAPLE AND ELM.x A CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREE HAVING FOLIAGE ON THE OUTERMOST PORTION OFTHE BRANCHES YEAR-ROUND AND WHICH IS AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET OR MORE INHEIGHT.xA GROUP OF DECIDUOUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST EIGHT (8) CALIPER INCHES ORCONIFEROUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET IN HEIGHT, THAT PROVIDEA BUFFER OR SCREENING ALONG AN ADJACENT PUBLIC STREET OR BETWEENDIFFERING LAND USES.TREE PROTECTION NOTESTEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENTSCALE: N.T.S.C2001KEYNOTE LEGENDEXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.)EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.)LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.)TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)ABCDTOTAL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES: 3,837TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 3,127TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED: 710ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL: 312.7 = (3,837 - 710)*0.1SIGNIFICANT TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED 1,407.15 CAL.IN. = ((3,837-710) - 312.7)/2NOTE: DEAD OR DYING TREES NOT COUNTED IN TREE MITIGATION DATATREE MITIGATION DATATREE INVENTORY DATANORTHLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION Attachment C PLAYGROUNDLAWN BOWLINGCOURTYARDCOURTYARDDOG RUNEXISTING STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREASNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPP R I V A T E D R I V EWET DETENTION BASINASSISTED LIVING113 UNITS33 MEMORY CARE UNITSSNELLING AVE./COUNTY RD. E RAMPPRIVATE DRIVEABBBBBBCC1831847779788780767574736061595862858488867271656463697057566855186818283969594939291909866675354525149483699100101103104105106353034333231282729117116108109110111112113123122114115121119120124125126127128142135133129130132131136134141118137139140232221201918171431441481471461451491511521531541551611601591571581561651691751641621631671681661721711731741761799718518718818913815089Genus, SpeciesCommonRemoved Condition17Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD18Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD19Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD20Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD21Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES GOOD22Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES GOOD23FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 34 YES GOOD27Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YES GOOD28Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD29FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 16 YES GOOD30Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD31Populus deltoidesCottonwood24YES GOOD32Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 YES GOOD33Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD34Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD35Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD36Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES GOOD48Salix spp.Willow22YESFAIR49Salix spp.Willow 38 YES GOOD51Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES FAIR52Acer negundoBoxelder14YES GOOD53Acer negundoBoxelder 28 YES GOOD54Acer negundoBoxelder 46 YES GOOD55Populus deltoidesCottonwood 64 YES GOOD56Populus deltoidesCottonwood 70 YES* GOOD57Populus deltoidesCottonwood 60 YES* GOOD58Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YES GOOD59Acer negundoBoxelder12YES GOOD60Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD61Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 YES GOOD62Populus deltoidesCottonwood44YES GOOD63Acer negundoBoxelder 34 YES GOOD64FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD65Acer negundoBoxelder14YES GOOD66Acer negundoBoxelder14YES GOOD67FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YES GOOD68Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YES GOOD69Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YESFAIR70Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES GOOD71Acer negundoBoxelder 20 YES FAIR72FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 10 YES GOOD73Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YES* FAIR74Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR75Populus deltoidesCottonwood 56 YES GOOD76Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YES GOOD77FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash22YES FAIR78Populus deltoidesCottonwood 42 YES GOOD79Salix spp.Willow 18 YES FAIR80FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 20 YESFAIR81Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR82FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR83Populus deltoidesCottonwood72YESFAIR84FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR85FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash14YES GOOD86Populus deltoidesCottonwood 54 YES* GOOD87Salix spp.Willow22YES GOOD88FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash14YES*FAIR90Acer negundoBoxelder 32 YES FAIR91FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash11YES* FAIR92Acer negundoBoxelder12YES*FAIR93Acer negundoBoxelder 18 YES*FAIR94Acer negundoBoxelder14YESFAIR95Acer negundoBoxelder12YESFAIR96Acer negundoBoxelder 16 YESFAIR97Acer negundoBoxelder22YES FAIR98Acer negundoBoxelder12YES FAIR99FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash22YES GOOD100 Acer saccarhaumSugar maple12YESEXCELLENT101Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES EXCELLENT103FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YESFAIR104Populus deltoidesCottonwood42YESFAIR105Quercus rubraRed oak14YES GOOD106Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD108Salix spp.Willow 26 YESFAIR109Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR110Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YESFAIR111Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES FAIR112Populus deltoidesCottonwood12YES FAIR113 Ulmus americana American elm12YESFAIR114Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YES GOOD115FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 18 YES GOOD116FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash 22 YES FAIR117Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD118Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD119Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YES GOOD120Populus deltoidesCottonwood 26 YES GOOD121Populus deltoidesCottonwood 25 YES FAIR122Populus deltoidesCottonwood22YESFAIR123Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YESFAIR124Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YESFAIR125Populus deltoidesCottonwood 40 YESFAIR126Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 YES FAIR127Populus deltoidesCottonwood 32 YESFAIR128Populus deltoidesCottonwood14YESFAIR129Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 YESFAIR130Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 YESFAIR131Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 YES GOOD132Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YES GOOD133Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 YESFAIR134Populus deltoidesCottonwood 34 YESFAIR135Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YESFAIR136Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 YES GOOD137Populus deltoidesCottonwood 61 YES FAIR138Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 YES POOR139Populus deltoidesCottonwood 37 YESFAIR140Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 YESFAIR141Salix spp.Willow 16 YES GOOD142FraxinuspennsylvanicaGreen Ash12YES*FAIR143Salix spp.Willow 42 NO FAIR144Salix spp.Willow 14 NO FAIR145Populus deltoidesCottonwood 24 NO FAIR146Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NOFAIR147Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NOFAIR148Populus deltoidesCottonwood24NOFAIR149Populus deltoidesCottonwood 50 NOFAIR150Salix spp.Willow 18 YES* POOR151Populus deltoidesCottonwood21NO GOOD152Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD153Populus deltoidesCottonwood22YES* GOOD154Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NOFAIR155Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD156Populus deltoidesCottonwood17YES* GOOD157Populus deltoidesCottonwood21NO GOOD158Populus deltoidesCottonwood 14 NO GOOD159Populus deltoidesCottonwood 18 NO GOOD160Populus deltoidesCottonwood 13 NO GOOD161Populus deltoidesCottonwood 16 NO GOOD162Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD163Populus deltoidesCottonwood 20 NO GOOD164Populus deltoidesCottonwood22NO GOOD165Populus deltoidesCottonwood 15 NO GOOD166Populus deltoidesCottonwood12NO GOOD167Populus deltoidesCottonwood 30 NO GOOD168Populus deltoidesCottonwood 38 NO GOOD169Populus deltoidesCottonwood17NO GOOD171Populus deltoidesCottonwood12NO GOOD172Populus deltoidesCottonwood 23 NO GOOD173Populus deltoidesCottonwood 19 NO GOOD174Populus deltoidesCottonwood 55 NO GOOD175Populus deltoidesCottonwood12NO GOOD176Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 NO GOOD183Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD184Populus deltoidesCottonwood 28 YES GOOD185Salix spp.Willow21YES GOOD186Salix spp.Willow 36 YES GOOD187Acer spp. Maple27NO GOOD188Acer spp. Maple22NO GOOD189Salix spp.Willow 16 NO GOODGenus, SpeciesCommonRemoved ConditionThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMC:\Users\Dan.Elenbaas\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_1636\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg January 29, 2021 - 3:23pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORTREE INVENTORYANDPRESERVATIONPLANC201ARDEN HILLSSENIOR LIVINGNEWPERSPECTIVEARDEN HILLSMNTREE TO BE REMOVEDPROPERTY LINETREE TO REMAINLEGENDTREE PROTECTIONSIGNFURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINEOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRIP LINE1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORTWILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY.3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITYHAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ONTREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES.4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHINDISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS.5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTALAUTHORITY.6. SIGNIFICANT TREE. A TREE THAT IS IMPORTANT TO THE SITE AND THE NEIGHBORHOODCHARACTER, THAT IS STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND HEALTHY, AND THAT MEETS AT LEASTONE OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:x A DECIDUOUS HARDWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TEN (10) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IRONWOOD, CATALPA, OAK, HARD MAPLE, WALNUT,HICKORY, BIRCH, BLACK CHERRY, HACKBERRY, LOCUST AND BASSWOOD.x A DECIDUOUS SOFTWOOD TREE THAT IS AT LEAST TWELVE (12) CALIPER INCHES,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COTTONWOOD, POPLARS/ASPEN, BOX ELDER,WILLOW, SILVER MAPLE AND ELM.x A CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREE HAVING FOLIAGE ON THE OUTERMOST PORTION OFTHE BRANCHES YEAR-ROUND AND WHICH IS AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET OR MORE INHEIGHT.xA GROUP OF DECIDUOUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST EIGHT (8) CALIPER INCHES ORCONIFEROUS TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST FIFTEEN (15) FEET IN HEIGHT, THAT PROVIDEA BUFFER OR SCREENING ALONG AN ADJACENT PUBLIC STREET OR BETWEENDIFFERING LAND USES.TREE PROTECTION NOTESTEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENTSCALE: N.T.S.C2011KEYNOTE LEGENDEXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.)EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.)LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.)TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL)(TYP.)ABCDTOTAL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES: 3,593TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 2,845TOTAL CALIPER INCHES REMOVED FOR PUBLIC GOOD: 324TOTAL ASH CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 281TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES PRESERVED: 748ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL: (3,593-324-281-748)*0.1 = 224SIGNIFICANT TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: ((3,593-324-281-748) - 224)/2 = 1,008 CAL. IN.NOTE: DEAD, DYING, POOR, OR CRITICAL TREES NOT COUNTED IN TREE MITIGATION DATATREE MITIGATION DATATREE INVENTORY DATANORTHLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOTAL: 115 REMOVED / 2,845 CAL. INCHESCOTTONWOOD: 57 REMOVED / 1,749 CAL. INCHESBOXELDER: 29 REMOVED / 560 CAL. INCHESGREEN ASH: 17 REMOVED / 281 CAL. INCHESWILLOW: 9 REMOVED / 217 CAL. INCHESSUGAR MAPLE: 1 REMOVED / 12 CAL. INCHESRED OAK: 1 REMOVED / 14 CAL. INCHESAMERICAN ELM: 1 REMOVED / 12 CAL. INCHESSPECIES REMOVED* DENOTES TREES REMOVED FOR PUBLIC GOOD Attachment D $WWDFKPHQW( ϭ ĂƚĞ͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϯ͕ϮϬϮϭ dŽ͗DŝŬĞDƌŽƐůĂ͕ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͕DE͕ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ &ƌŽŵ͗ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐZ͕>> Z͗dƌĞĞWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶhƉĚĂƚĞ    ĞĂƌDŝŬĞ͕  ƐĂĨŽůůŽǁƵƉƚŽƚŚĞ:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϮϱƚŚƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůDĞĞƚŝŶŐ͕ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐZ͕>>͕ĂƐ͞ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ͕͟ŝƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĚĞƚĂŝůƐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞƚƌĞĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚͬŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶĨŽƌŽƵƌƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐĞŶŝŽƌ ůŝǀŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚϮWŝŶĞdƌĞĞƌ͕͘ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͕DEϱϱϭϭϮ͘  KƵƌĨŝƌƐƚƐƚĞƉŝŶƌĞǀŝƐŝƚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐǁĂƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƚƌĞĞƐǁĞƌĞĐŽƵŶƚĞĚƚŽǁĂƌĚƐ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƐ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƚƌĞĞŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŚĂƐďĞĞŶƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƚŽƌĞŵŽǀĞ ĚĞĂĚ͕ĚLJŝŶŐ͕ƉŽŽƌ͕ŽƌĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůƚƌĞĞƐ͘ƌŝƚŝĐĂůĂŶĚƉŽŽƌƚƌĞĞƐĂƌĞĂůŵŽƐƚĚĞĂĚŽƌŚĂǀĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŝƌƌĞĐŽǀĞƌĂďůĞ͘WůĞĂƐĞƐĞĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƵƉĚĂƚĞĚƚƌĞĞƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŝƐĂ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJƚŚĞƚƌĞĞƐƵƌǀĞLJŽƌǁŚŝĐŚĞdžƉůĂŝŶƚŚĞŝƌƌĞŵŽǀĂůĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͗  ϭ͘ ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶͶ^ƚĂĨĨĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƐƐŝŐŶƐŽĨƐƚƌĞƐƐ͕ƉŽŽƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĚĂŵĂŐĞ͕ƐŽŝůĂŶĚƌŽŽƚ ƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ͕ĚŝƐĞĂƐĞ͕ĂŶĚƉĞƐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨƚƌĞĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ Ă͘ džĐĞůůĞŶƚʹĂƐƉĞĐŝŵĞŶƚƌĞĞŝŶĞdžĐĞůůĞŶƚŚĞĂůƚŚĨƌĞĞŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ͘ ď͘ 'ŽŽĚʹĂŐŽŽĚƚƌĞĞƐŚŽǁƐŶŽƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉƌŽďůĞŵƐ͘ Đ͘ &ĂŝƌʹĂĨĂŝƌƚƌĞĞŚĂƐŵŝŶŽƌƉƌŽďůĞŵƐƚŚĂƚŵĂLJďĞĐŽƌƌĞĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŝŵĞŽƌĐŽƌƌĞĐƚŝǀĞĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ Ě͘ WŽŽƌʹĂƉŽŽƌƚƌĞĞŚĂƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉƌŽďůĞŵƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŝƌƌĞĐŽǀĞƌĂďůĞ͘ Ğ͘ ĞĂĚʹĂĚĞĂĚƚƌĞĞƐŚŽǁƐŶŽƐŝŐŶŽĨůŝĨĞ͘ Ĩ͘ ƌŝƚŝĐĂůʹĂƚƌĞĞŝƐĂůŵŽƐƚĚĞĂĚĂŶĚƐŚŽǁƐĂůŝǀĞĐƌŽǁŶůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϮϬй͘͟  •ƐŚƚƌĞĞƐŚĂǀĞŶŽƚďĞĞŶĐŽƵŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƚƌĞĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶďĞĐĂƵƐĞƐŚƚƌĞĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƉůĂŶƚĞĚ ĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞƚŚƌĞĂƚŽĨĞŵĞƌĂůĚĂƐŚďŽƌĞƌ͘tŚĞŶƚƌĞĞƐďĞĐŽŵĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďLJĞŵĞƌĂůĚĂƐŚďŽƌĞƌĂŶĚ ĚŝĞ͕ƚŚĞLJďĞĐŽŵĞĚĂŶŐĞƌŽƵƐĨƌŽŵĨĂůůŝŶŐďƌĂŶĐŚĞƐ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƐŚƚƌĞĞƐŽŶƐŝƚĞĐƌĞĂƚĞĂ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƐĂĨĞƚLJŚĂnjĂƌĚ͘  •ŽdžĞůĚĞƌƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĚƵĞƚŽŝƚƐĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽƐĞůĨͲƐĞĞĚĂŐŐƌĞƐƐŝǀĞůLJ͘dŚĞƐĞƚƌĞĞƐ ĂƌĞŚŝŐŚůLJƐƵƐĐĞƉƚŝďůĞƚŽŝĐĞĚĂŵĂŐĞ͕ŚĂǀĞŵĞƐƐLJĨƌƵŝƚͬƉůĂŶƚƉĂƌƚƐ͕ŚĂǀĞǁĞĂŬǁŽŽĚĂŶĚďƌĂŶĐŚ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞƐĞƚƌĞĞƐĂƚƚƌĂĐƚďŽdžĞůĚĞƌďƵŐƐǁŚŝĐŚŽĨƚĞŶĞŶƚĞƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŝŶƚŚĞĨĂůů͘  •ŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚĂŶĚǁŝůůŽǁƚƌĞĞƐĂƌĞĞdžƚƌĞŵĞůLJĨĂƐƚŐƌŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐƚŽŵĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞŵǁĞĂŬ ǁŽŽĚĞĚĂŶĚĂƌĞŬŶŽǁŶĨŽƌĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚůLJƐŚĞĚĚŝŶŐďƌĂŶĐŚĞƐ͘dŚĞLJĂƌĞŚŝŐŚůLJƐƵƐĐĞƉƚŝďůĞƚŽŝĐĞ ĚĂŵĂŐĞ͕ƚŚĞŝƌĂŐŐƌĞƐƐŝǀĞƌŽŽƚƐĂƌĞƉƌŽŶĞƚŽŝŶǀĂĚĞƐĞǁĞƌƉŝƉĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƐƐƵĐŬĞƌƐ͕ǁĞĂŬ ǁŽŽĚĂŶĚďƌĂŶĐŚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞŝƌůĂƌŐĞƐŝnjĞ͕ǁĞĂŬǁŽŽĚ͕ĂŶĚƉĞŶĞƚƌĂƚŝŶŐƌŽŽƚƐƚŚĞLJĂƌĞ ďĞƐƚƐƵŝƚĞĚƚŽůĂƌŐĞǁŝĚĞŽƉĞŶŶĂƚŝǀĞĂƌĞĂƐ͘dLJƉŝĐĂůůLJ͕ƚŚĞƐĞƚƌĞĞƐĂƌĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨŽƌ ƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƌŝƉĂƌŝĂŶĂƌĞĂƐ͘  DĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJϭʹ͞ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚWĞƌdƌĞĞDĞƚŚŽĚ͟ dŚĞĐĂƐŚͲŝŶͲůĞƵŽĨƚƌĞĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚďĞƚǁĞĞŶŝƚLJ^ƚĂĨĨĂŶĚƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚ ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚƚŽŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϮϱƚŚƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐŝƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJĂŶĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶŝŶŐĂƚƌĞĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂƚƌĞĞͲďLJͲƚƌĞĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚďĂƐŝƐ͘/ĨŝƚŝƐĨĂŝƌƚŽĞdžƉĞĐƚƚŚĂƚ Attachment F Ϯ ƚŚĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚƚƌĞĞƐǁŝůůĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJŐƌŽǁƚŽŵĂƚĐŚƚŚĞƐŝnjĞ;ĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐͿŽĨƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚƌĞĞƐŽŶƐŝƚĞ ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞďĞŝŶŐƌĞŵŽǀĞĚ͕ƚŚĞĂƐƐƵŵƉƚŝŽŶǁĂƐƚŽƵƐĞƚŚŝƐŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJĂƐĂŶĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞWh͘&ŽƌƐĂŬĞŽĨĞdžƉůĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞŝŶŝƚŝĂůĐĂƐŚͲŝŶͲůŝĞƵŽĨƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͕ƉůĞĂƐĞƐĞĞƚŚĞƉƌŝĐŝŶŐďĞůŽǁƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞƌŽƵŐŚůLJΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘dŚĞƉƌŝĐŝŶŐŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶƋƵĂŶƚŝƚLJ ĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƚLJƉĞŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚƌĞĞƐŽŶƐŝƚĞ͕ŵĂƚĐŚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚŽĨĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ƚƌĞĞƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘  dƌĞĞWƌŝĐŝŶŐ ŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͗ϱϳƚƌĞĞƐΎΨϭϱϯ ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͗ϮϵƚƌĞĞƐΎΨϭϱϯ tŝůůŽǁ͗ϵƚƌĞĞƐΎΨϭϱϯ ^ƵŐĂƌDĂƉůĞ͗ϭƚƌĞĞΎΨϱϬϬ ZĞĚKĂŬ͗ϭƚƌĞĞΎΨϱϬϬ ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶůŵ͗ϭƚƌĞĞΎΨϱϬϬ сΨϭϲ͕ϬϯϱdžϭϭϬйсΨϭϳ͕ϲϯϵ  DĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJϮʹ͞ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚWĞƌĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚDĞƚŚŽĚ͟ WĞƌƚŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚƚƌĞĞŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚƌĞĞƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͕ƚŚĞƚƌĞĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝƐ ϭ͕ϬϬϴĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ͘EŽƚĞ͕ĂďƌĞĂŬĚŽǁŶŽĨĞĂĐŚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƚLJƉĞďĞŝŶŐƌĞŵŽǀĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗  dŽƚĂů͗   ϭϭϱdƌĞĞƐZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϮ͕ϴϰϱĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ  ŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͗  ϱϳZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϭ͕ϳϰϵĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;ϲϭ͘ϰϴйͿ ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͗  ϮϵZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϱϲϬĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;ϭϵ͘ϲϴйͿ 'ƌĞĞŶƐŚ͗  ϭϳZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϮϴϭĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;ϵ͘ϴϴйͿ tŝůůŽǁ͗  ϵZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϮϭϳĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;ϳ͘ϲϯйͿ ^ƵŐĂƌDĂƉůĞ͗  ϭZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϭϮĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;Ϭ͘ϰϮйͿ ZĞĚKĂŬ͗  ϭZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϭϰĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;Ϭ͘ϰϵйͿ ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶůŵ͗  ϭZĞŵŽǀĞĚͬϭϮĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐ;Ϭ͘ϰϮйͿ  WĞƌƚŚĞĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϯ͕^ƵďƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϯŽĨƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐZĞǀŝĞǁŽŵŵĞŶƚƐůĞƚƚĞƌ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϯƌĚ͕ϮϬϮϬ͕ƚŚĞǀĂůƵĞŽĨƚƌĞĞƐďĞŝŶŐƌĞŵŽǀĞĚŝƐĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗  dƌĞĞDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͗ ϭ͕ϬϬϴĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ DŝŶƵƐdƌĞĞƐƚŽďĞWůĂŶƚĞĚŽŶ^ŝƚĞ͗ ͲϱϲϰĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ ƋƵĂůƐdƌĞĞƐEĞĞĚĞĚƚŽďĞZĞƉůĂĐĞĚ͗ϰϰϰĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ  DƵůƚŝƉůLJďLJйŽĨdƌĞĞƐĞŝŶŐŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͕ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͕ƐŚ͕ŽƌtŝůůŽǁ ϵϴ͘ϲϲй ƋƵĂůƐ^ŚĂƌĞŽĨĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐĞŝŶŐŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͕ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͕ƐŚ͕ŽƌtŝůůŽǁ ϰϯϴĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ DƵůƚŝƉůLJďLJZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽƐƚƉĞƌŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͕ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͕ƐŚ͕ŽƌtŝůůŽǁdƌĞĞƐΨϭϬϮΎ ƋƵĂůƐŽƐƚŽĨŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚ͕ŽdžĞůĚĞƌ͕ƐŚ͕tŝůůŽǁ^ŚĂƌĞŽĨZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚdƌĞĞƐ Ψϰϰ͕ϲϳϲ  ^ŚĂƌĞŽĨĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚĞƐĞŝŶŐDĂƉůĞͬKĂŬͬůŵϲĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ DƵůƚŝƉůLJďLJZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽƐƚƉĞƌDĂƉůĞͬKĂŬͬůŵdƌĞĞƐΨϮϳϱΎΎ ƋƵĂůƐŽƐƚŽĨDĂƉůĞͬKĂŬͬůŵ^ŚĂƌĞŽĨZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚdƌĞĞƐ Ψϭ͕ϲϱϬ  dŽƚĂůс;Ψϰϰ͕ϲϳϲнΨϯ͕ϯϬϬͿΎϭϭϬйсΨϱϬ͕ϵϱϴ͘ϲϬ  ϯ ΎΨϭϬϮƉƌŝĐĞďĂƐĞĚŽĨĨĂϭϱͲŐĂůůŽŶŽƚƚŽŶǁŽŽĚƚƌĞĞ͕ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭ͘ϱĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚƉƌŝĐĞĚĂƚΨϭϱϯ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ͘WƌŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJůŽĐĂůĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͘  ΎΎΨϮϳϱƉƌŝĐĞƉĞƌĐĂůŝƉĞƌŝŶĐŚďĂƐĞĚŽŶϮ͟^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŶƵŵďĞƌƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJĐŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨ͘  ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ dŚĞƚǁŽŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐŝĞƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐůĞƚƚĞƌ;͞ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚWĞƌdƌĞĞDĞƚŚŽĚ͟ĂŶĚ͞ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚWĞƌ ĂůŝƉĞƌ/ŶĐŚDĞƚŚŽĚ͟ͿƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƚŚĞĐĂƐŚͲŝŶͲůŝĞƵŽĨƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚƐŚŽƵůĚƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵΨϭϴ͕ϬϬϬƚŽ Ψϱϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘tĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽĞŵƉŚĂƐŝnjĞƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƉůĂŶǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂůŽŶŐůŝǀĞĚ͕ůƵƐŚ͕ ĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĂůůLJďĞĂƵƚŝĨƵůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ͕ƐŚƌƵďƐĂŶĚƉĞƌĞŶŶŝĂůƐŽĨǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƐŝnjĞƐĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƚLJƉĞƐĂŶĚĂ ƚƌĂŝůƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĂůůďĞĂŶĂƐƐĞƚƚŽƚŚĞƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ͕ŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĞĞƐŽŶƐŝƚĞǁŽƵůĚďĞ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚǁĞĂŬǁŽŽĚĞĚĂŶĚƐŚŽƌƚͲůŝǀĞĚ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚƌĞĞƐƚŽďĞƉůĂŶƚĞĚŽŶƐŝƚĞǁŝůůďĞĚŝƐĞĂƐĞͲ ƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶƚ͕ƐƚƌŽŶŐ͕ĂŶĚůŽŶŐͲůŝǀĞĚƚƌĞĞƐ͘  tĞĂƉƉƌĞĐŝĂƚĞƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĚĞƚĂŝůƐĂŶĚůŽŽŬĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŶŐƚŚĞ ƚƌĞĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͘/ĨƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂŶLJĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐŽƌĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞĚŽŶŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĂƚĞ ƚŽƌĞĂĐŚŽƵƚĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJĂƚ;ϰϭϰͿϴϳϱͲϳϱϭϴŽƌĂƚ&ůŽƌĞŶƚ͘ŝůĂnjŝΛďŽůĚƚ͘ĐŽŵ͘  ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕  &ůŽƌĞŶƚ/ůĂnjŝ ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐZ͕>>  1325.055 Subd. 6 Approved Tree Mitigation. A. Mitigation Standards. Mitigation for tree removal of significant trees must meet the following specific standards; 1. Mitigation Rate. Significant live trees lost or reasonably anticipated to be lost as a result of building, construction, or grading immediately or in the future, shall be replaced by the property owner by planting that number of caliper inches of trees ("replacement trees") determined at a rate of 1:2 or one inch replaced for every two inches lost. The trees required to be replaced pursuant to this Section shall be in addition to any other trees required to be planted pursuant to any other provision of the Code. 2. Mitigation Species. Replacement trees shall be of a species similar to the trees which are lost or removed and shall include those species pre-approved in writing by the City. The City maintains a list of trees provided for guidance in selection of trees and shrubs. 3. General Mitigation Standards. a) All replacement trees shall meet the American Standards for Nursery Stock relating to quality of stock and appropriate sizing of the root ball for balled and burlapped and spade- moved trees. b) Trees planted in accordance with mitigation requirements shall not be comprised of more than 25 percent of the same species or size unless approved by the city. c) Replacement trees shall be planted on the same property from which the trees were removed. If the City determines, at its sole discretion, that the number of replacement trees to be planted exceeds the number of trees that can be accommodated practically on-site, off-site planting may occur at locations to be determined by the City, or a fee in lieu of off-site planting may be required as provided in paragraph d below. d) Where tree replacement on-site is not practical and a suitable off-site location cannot be determined by the City, a fee in lieu thereof may be assessed for the replacement required. The fee amount shall be the cost of materials and installation tree, plus ten (10) percent, and shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the City. All funds collected shall be expended exclusively for implementation of the goals listed in Subd. 1 of this section. e) Development that is subject to the landscape requirements in Section 1325.05 of the Zoning Code may count preserved trees towards the required landscaping plan. The planting of trees for mitigation shall be in addition to the landscape requirements of Section 1325.05. f) The required mitigation trees shall be replaced by the property owner or original developer if they have died or have severely declined after the second full growing season following installation. A tree shall be considered to be severely declined if more than 25 percent of the crown has died. $WWDFKPHQW* Planning Case # 20-022 – Public Hearing RequiredApplicant: Arden Hills RE, LLCProperty Location: 2 Pine Tree North DriveUnfinished Business -Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Zoning: B-2 General Business District Land Use: Community Mixed Use Acreage: 6.41 Proposal and Use•The Applicant is proposing to construct a 4 story, 146 unit multi-family senior living facility with underground parking.•The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living2 Design Standards Parking -Flexibly Requested3UnitsUnit CountsRequired StallsNumber of Stalls ProvidedParking Deficiency Residential FacilityNA 4595 -1071-bedroom units(1.1 parking stalls)75 812 or more bedrooms(2 parking stalls)38 76Total113 202New Perspective Senior Living ParkingTotal Resident Parking Required60Total Staff Parking Required34Visitor Parking14TotalParking Stalls Required108Number of Stalls Provided95CrossParking Agreement25TotalParking 120Parking Deficiency:+7 Tree Mitigation4Original Plan Revised PlanPoor–a poor tree has significant problems that areirrecoverable.Critical–a tree is almost dead and shows a live crown less than20%.Dead–a dead tree shows no sign of life. 55 FT. Sidewalk10 FT. Trail Tree Mitigation6Table 1 Original PlanApplicants Revised PlanOrdinance Requirements Existing Significant Caliper Inches3,837 3,593 3,593Remaining Caliper Inches710 748 748Inches removed for public good (Public trail, utility service)- 324 324**Ash Tree Removal*- 281* -Proposed Significant Tree Removal3,127 2,240 2,521Allowable Removal (10%)312.7 224 252.1Removal Requiring Mitigation2,811 2560.5/2016 2,268.9Mitigation Requirement (1” for each 2” removed)1,405 1,0081134.45Proposed Plantings564 564 564Replacement Required841 444 570 Tree Mitigation7•City Code section 1325.055 Subd 5 states that Applicant is required to replace removed trees with trees of a species similar to the trees which are lost or removed. •If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. The fee in lieu amount shall be the cost of materials and installation tree, plus ten (10) percent. •As a condition of approval, prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. Discussion8Fee in Lieu •The Applicant previously requested flexibility to pay $20,000 fee in lieu of replacement. Tree Pricing•Cottonwood: 57 trees * $153•Boxelder: 29 trees * $153•Willow: 9 trees * $153•Sugar Maple: 1 tree * $500•Red Oak: 1 tree * $500•American Elm: 1 tree * $500•= $16,035 x 110% = $17,639 or $20,000 •According to the report submitted by Applicant (Attachment F) the replacement require is 444* caliper inches or $50,958.60. *It’s worth noting that this total was arrived at by not counting Ash trees as replaceable trees and replacing removed trees with the same tree species. The following is motion language options for the City Council to consider. Planned Unit Development approvals require a supermajority (four affirmative votes).1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of a Planned Unit Development and Site Plan for Planning Case 20-022 at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 9Proposed Motion Language CConditions of Approval1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect.2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted.4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit.10 CConditions of Approval5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit.6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference.8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons.11 CConditions of Approval9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance.10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan.12 CConditions of Approval12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work.13 CConditions of Approval15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the placement of landscaping on their property.16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted.17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property.18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 14 CConditions of Approval19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements.20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City.21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County and, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities.15 CConditions of Approval22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work.23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant.24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 16 CConditions of Approval25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets.27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 17 CConditions of Approval29.Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30.Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department.18 CConditions of Approval31.This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4.32.The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement.33.In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.19 RecommendApprovalwithoutConditions:MotiontorecommendapprovalofthePlannedUnitDevelopmentandSitePlanforPlanningCase20-022at2PineTreeDrive,basedonthefindingsoffactandsubmittedplansinthereporttothe&LW\&RXQFLO.RecommendDenial:MotiontorecommenddenialofthePlannedUnitDevelopmentandSitePlanforPlanningCase20-022at2PineTreeDrive,basedonthefollowingfindingsoffact:the&LW\&RXQFLOshouldidentifyfindingstodenyshouldspecificallyreferencethereasonsfordenialandwhythosereasonscannotbemitigated.Table:MotiontotablePlanningCase20-022forthePlannedUnitDevelopmentandSitePlanforPlanningCase20-022at2PineTreeDriveforthefollowingreasons:the &LW\ &RXQFLOshouldidentifyaspecificreasonand/orinformationrequestshouldbeincludedwithamotiontotable.20Proposed Motion Language