Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-07-21 Planning Commission
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 6, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting 01 -06 -21 PC.PDF PLANNING CASES Planning Case 21 -001 –Boston Scientific Building 14 Addition -Amendment To Planned Unit Development (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF Planning Case 21 -002 –Bethel Football Field Improvements –Amended Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Planning Case 21 -004 –3783 Lexington Avenue (Lexington Station 3rd Addition) – Amended Planned Unit Development And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF Planning Case 21 -006 –4073 Valentine Court -Variance Request To Allow A 3rd Stall Garage Addition (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair: Paul Vijums Commissioners: Steven Jones James Lambeth Subbaya Subramanian Jonathan Wicklund Clayton Zimmerman Marcie Jefferys Kurt Weber Council Liaison: Fran Holmes Planning Commission April 7, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82135739180 This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website Agenda CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 2.A. Documents: 3. 3.A. Documents: 3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 3.D. Documents: 4. 5. 5.A. 5.B. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 6, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting01-06 -21 PC.PDFPLANNING CASES Planning Case 21 -001 –Boston Scientific Building 14 Addition -Amendment To Planned Unit Development (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF Planning Case 21 -002 –Bethel Football Field Improvements –Amended Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Planning Case 21 -004 –3783 Lexington Avenue (Lexington Station 3rd Addition) – Amended Planned Unit Development And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF Planning Case 21 -006 –4073 Valentine Court -Variance Request To Allow A 3rd Stall Garage Addition (No Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Paul VijumsCommissioners:Steven JonesJames LambethSubbaya SubramanianJonathan WicklundClayton Zimmerman Marcie JefferysKurt WeberCouncil Liaison:Fran Holmes Planning Commission April 7, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser):https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82135739180This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3. 3.A. Documents: 3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 3.D. Documents: 4. 5. 5.A. 5.B. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJanuary 6, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting01-06 -21 PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 21 -001 –Boston Scientific Building 14 Addition -Amendment To Planned Unit Development (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFPlanning Case 21 -002 –Bethel Football Field Improvements –Amended Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFPlanning Case 21 -004 –3783 Lexington Avenue (Lexington Station 3rd Addition) –Amended Planned Unit Development And Site Plan (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFPlanning Case 21 -006 –4073 Valentine Court -Variance Request To Allow A 3rd Stall Garage Addition (No Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFUNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Paul VijumsCommissioners:Steven JonesJames LambethSubbaya SubramanianJonathan WicklundClayton Zimmerman Marcie JefferysKurt WeberCouncil Liaison:Fran Holmes Planning Commission April 7, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser):https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82135739180This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents:3.B.Documents:3.C.Documents:3.D.Documents:4. 5. 5.A. 5.B. 6. Approved: April 7, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANURY 6, 2021 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Nick Gehrig called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic this meeting was held virtually. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Nick Gehrig, Commissioners Marcie Jefferys, Steven Jones, Subbaya Subramanian, Paul Vijums, Kurtis Weber, and Jonathan Wicklund. Absent: Commissioners James Lambeth and Clayton Zimmerman. Also present were: Community Development Manager Mike Mrosla, Associate Planner Joe Hartmann, and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – JANUARY 6, 2021 Chair Gehrig stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 9, 2020 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Vijums moved, seconded by Commissioner Jones, to approve the December 9, 2020, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 20-022; 2 Pine Tree North – Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment Request – Public Hearing Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated Arden Hills RE, LLC (“Applicant”) on behalf of New Perspective Senior Living has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Zoning Code Amendment for a project located at 2 Pine Tree Drive (“Subject Property”). The Applicant is proposing to ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 2 construct a four (4) story, 146 unit multi-family senior living facility with underground parking. The housing units will include independent living, assisted living and memory care. The Subject Property is zoned B-2 General Business District and is guided as Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented at its June 22, 2020 meeting the City Council approved Bethel University’s proposal for a Master Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat at 12 Pine Tree Drive (Bethel’s Anderson Center). The approval subdivided the existing property into three (3) lots of record, one (1) lot of record for the existing building and parking lot, and two (2) new lots on the north side of the property. The Applicant is proposing to develop Lot 1 as shown on the image below and in attachment C. The Subject Property is 6.4 acres and is currently owned by Bethel University. The Subject Property currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, four (4) story multi-family senior living facility on site. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units of independent or assisted living and thirty-three (33) units devoted to memory care. The property will be owned and managed by New Perspective Senior Living. New Perspective Senior Living owns and manages 24 senior living communities throughout the Midwest. The proposed facility in Arden Hills will offer independent care, assisted living, and memory care. The project also includes such amenities as a pool, library, movie theater, dog run, playground for young visitors, lawn bowling, salon and spa, bistro/bar and onsite physical therapy and wellness services. This facility will staff 80 employees and the anticipated max shift size is 34. Staff will be onsite 24 hours a day. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open space with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson Center trail system running through the site. 4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi-family senior living facility on site. 5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. 6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking stall count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree mitigation. 7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City Code in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, planting islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree selection, lighting, screening and aesthetics. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 3 8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. 9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. 10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 11. Existing public facilities will be able to absorb the additional demand for public services needed for the proposed use. 12. The maximum dwelling unit density per net area that is allowed within the B-2 District is 20 units per acre. 13. The Applicant is requesting a Zoning ordinance amendment that would to add language allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of 0.5 units. If approved, the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the Master PUD and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development approvals shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the December 21, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 4 9. For any landscaping or screening that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the city before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the city, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 10. The Applicant shall submit cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of 20 percent of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit the Applicant shall work with the City to locate the additional caliper inches of replacement trees on the site or on the adjacent properties. If the replacement tree plantings cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site, the City can work with the applicant to find off-site locations for the plantings or require that a fee in lieu of the plantings be provided. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 15. Prior to issuance of a sign grading and erosion control permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 16. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Bethel University the owner of Outlot A permitting the construction of the proposed monument sign on their property and offsite signs are not permitted. 17. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant shall provide City staff with written approval from Lake Johanna Fire Department the owner of Lot 2, Block 1 on permitting the placement of landscaping on their property. 18. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County and, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 22. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 5 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24. The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The bond or surety shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits and shall be valid for two full years from the date of installation, or three years in the case of an extended timeline. The total security shall be addressed in the Development Agreement. 26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 146 units. 28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Developer Agreement. 33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Gehrig opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Wicklund asked if it was normal to have a zoning code amendment tied directly to a PUD approval. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 6 Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was not common. He explained staff was ensuring that all appropriate regulations were in place for this use. He noted memory care units were a trending factor. Commissioner Wicklund questioned if staff and the Council were in favor of putting both items together. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated this was the case. Commissioner Wicklund inquired if the City would be synching City Code to the TCAAP regulations. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this has not been done and would not be done until the City receives active applications for properties within TCAAP. Commissioner Wicklund asked if the size of these senior living units would be a concern to the City Council. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented this was discussed by the Council. He noted all units met City requirements except for the memory care units. Commissioner Weber questioned if the common areas will be accessible or available to other residents on the property. Florent ___________, Project Manager on behalf of Wold Architects, thanked the Commission for their time and consideration. He explained the assisted living and independent living areas have their own common spaces complete with fireplaces, billiards room and dance hall. Commissioner Weber stated he was concerned with the size of the memory care unit. He feared that too many people were being crammed into a small space. Adam Cozine, New Perspective representative, stated his buildings had a large percentage of common space at roughly 40%, especially when compared to the competition. He explained he had some of the largest memory care common area spaces of any operator in the country. He reported his organization was a strong operator when it comes to senior living with memory care units. Todd ______________, New Perspective representative, explained he started this business 22 years ago after having his mother-in-law, Betty, living with him with Alzheimer’s for seven years. He indicated his family couldn’t find a place that would fit her needs. This led him to create a new type of senior living development that would meet the changing needs of seniors. He commented further the types of units offered to seniors within his developments. Commissioner Weber inquired if the City had any other memory care units that were smaller than 500 square feet. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported Summit Development was proposing to build 120 memory care units on Parkshore Drive and their units were 400 square feet. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 7 Commissioner Weber questioned who owned the private drive. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated Bethel University owns and would maintain the private drive. Commissioner Weber asked if appropriate pedestrian crossings would be put in at some point in the future. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented crossings would be installed at the intersections and after Lot 1 was developed crosswalks would be installed. Commissioner Vijums stated he was not concerned about tree mitigation. He discussed City Code requirements regarding efficiency/studio units. He reported the size of the memory care units were a concern to him, even if there was only 17 of them. He asked if the builders could increase the size of these units to 400 to 450 square feet. He feared for the residents of these units and wondered how much smaller developers would go. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the Summit Development was approved with 400 square foot memory care units. Todd ____________ explained the research shows fewer steps and more familiarity is best for dementia and Alzheimer patients. He stated this has led to smaller sized units for memory care patients. He commented further on how the four memory care pods were surrounded by bright and airy open spaces. Commissioner Vijums thanked Mr. ___________ for the additional information on the memory care unit design. He agreed with Commissioner Weber that the density was tight for the memory care units. He asked if this building had received Fire Marshal approval. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Fire Marshal had reviewed the building and provided comments to staff and the development team. He noted there were no overall concerns to the request. He reported the Fire Marshal would take a closer look at the plans when the developers requested a building permit. Commissioner Subramanian thanked staff for the detailed report. He asked how much security the memory care units had to ensure the residents did not wander away. He discussed how the recent pandemic has impacted the elderly population. He questioned if this building had restrictions or plans in place to address this concern. Todd ___________ addressed the pod system that would be in place within the memory care wing. He reported a resident would have to push on a panic bar for 15 continuous seconds in order to get through a door. He noted if someone pushes on an emergency bar, an alarm is sounded and a health aid or caregiver would be notified. Florent ___________ further described the electronic technology that would be in place within the building to assist in keeping the residents safe and secure. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 8 Commissioner Subramanian questioned how the current pandemic impacted the design of this building. Florent __________ discussed how operations had adjusted to combat and address the COVID- 19 concerns. He thanked all of the healthcare workers for working through the pandemic. He commented further on how the physical plant of the building had changed in order to provide proper screens, spacing and barriers to protect loved ones. He noted the HVAC units also had HEPA filters installed for improved air quality. Commissioner Jones stated he was very familiar with HVAC units within senior living facilities. He explained he was very pleased with these plans after reviewing them in detail. He appreciated the pod system within the memory care wing for security purposes. He indicated memory care units are not supposed to have kitchenettes for safety purposes. He stated he fully supported the proposed high quality development. Commissioner Jefferys asked if memory care units required licensure from the State and had to be a minimum size. Mr. _____________ explained he would be receiving an assisted living license. Gary Fisher, architect for the project, explained the State had building code minimums. He reported the proposed project met building code requirements. Commissioner Jefferys stated it did not make sense to exclude the memory care units from the calculation of the development. she encouraged staff to find a better way to calculate the unit size for memory care units. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated he has seen memory care units count as a .33 unit. He explained he had calculated the memory care units as a .5 unit. He commented further on how units were calculated within nursing homes. He described how the Met Council classified memory care and assisted living units. Todd ___________ reported assisted living developments were licensed within every state and certain criteria had to be met. Commissioner Jefferys questioned how residents would pay for their units and asked what the price point would be for these units. Todd ___________ stated residents would pay for their units on a monthly basis. He reiterated that his business was for profit and described how he works with tenants to keep rent covered through Medicaid. He explained he could provide the Commission with a range of rents for the units. He noted all residents do have to prove they can pay rent for two years prior to receiving a unit. Chair Gehrig commented on the parking variance and requested further information on the parking requested. Todd ____________ explained the 95 parking stalls being requested would be sufficient. He stated the only time additional parking may be needed was for holidays. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 9 Chair Gehrig stated he was pleased to see the building would have 14 visitor parking stalls. Alex __________ discussed the 25 additional parking spaces that was being discussed with Bethel University for overflow parking. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented on the cross access agreement that would have to be reached between the developer and Bethel University. Chair Gehrig opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. Chair Gehrig invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being additional comments Chair Gehrig closed the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. Commissioner Weber requested clarification on the difference between memory care units versus nursing home units. Mr. Cozine discussed the type of positions he would be hiring for the memory care and assisted living units. Todd __________ explained his philosophy was to hire and do his own extensive training for his staff members. He noted he would have RNs, LPNs, CNAs and triage nurses on staff. Alex ___________ discussed the conversations he has had with Bethel University to create internships and training opportunities for nursing students. Commissioner Weber encouraged the developer to keep the trail safe and open to the public. Commissioner Wicklund moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 20-022 for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Code Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the thirty-three (33) conditions in the January 6, 2021, report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS A. Report from the City Council Councilmember Holmes provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. She noted she would be serving as the Planning Commission liaison for 2021. She thanked Chair Gehrig for his dedicated service to the Planning Commission and thanked Commissioner Vijums for being willing to step up and serve as the Chair. She explained the Council held a Truth in Taxation Hearing on December 14, 2020 where the 2021 budget and tax levy was approved. She ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 6, 2021 10 indicated the Council has waived the liquor license fees for on-sale license holders for the first half of the year. She noted the Council discussed the B-2 design standards and the Lexington Station Phase 3 development at a recent worksession. She noted residents could drop off broken or unused strands of holiday lights at City Hall through January 29, 2021. Lastly, she reported ice rinks opened on January 2, 2021. B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests None. C. Staff Comments Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was Chair Gehrig’s last meeting. He explained Commissioner Paul Vijums would be serve as the Planning Commission Chair beginning in February. In addition, he noted this was Associate Planner Joe Hartmann’s last meeting with the City of Arden Hills. He wished him all the best in his future endeavors. Commissioner Subramanian thanked Chair Gehrig for his time with the Planning Commission and for leading this group well. ADJOURN Commissioner Jones moved, seconded by Commissioner Subramanian, to adjourn the January 6, 2021, Planning Commission Meeting at 8:26 p.m. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM DATE:April 7, 2021 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM:Jane Kansier, AICP, Planning Consultant, Bolton & Menk SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-001 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Lorne Rothbauer, Boston Scientific Property Location: 4100 Hamline Avenue N Request: Amended Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review Requested Action Lorne Rothbauer of Boston Scientific (“The Applicant”) is requesting Amended Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 4100 Hamline Avenue N (“Subject Property”) to renovate a 17,450 square foot addition to the south side of Building 14, in the northwest corner of the Arden Hills campus near Innovation Way. The purpose of this facility is the development and production of lithium batteries for use in medical devices. The primary space in the facility is a ‘dry room,’ a space maintained at less than 1% relative humidity, which is required for handling lithium. Ancillary functions in the addition include office and conference space. Background 1. Overview of Request The Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North operates under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was originally approved in 2002 for the Guidant Corporation. The last update to the PUD and Campus Master Plan took place in 2020 when the City approved a loading dock addition to the South side of Building 10. Before that, in 2017, the City approved a 5,330 square foot building addition on the northeast corner of Building 9 (Planning Case 17-013). New building construction or site modification identified on the approved Campus Master Plan requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. The proposed addition to Building 14 is not shown on the current Master Plan and a PUD Amendment is therefore being requested. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 2 of 6 Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1.District Provisions (I-1 Limited Industrial District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the Boston Scientific campus is guided as Light Industrial and Office on the land use plan. The Subject Property is a permitted use as a manufacturer of medical devices within this district. The changes to the Campus Master Plan that the Applicants propose to add are entirely exterior and complementary to the use of the Subject Property as a medical device manufacturer. Boston Scientific is regulated under a PUD that permits the Subject Property to operate medical manufacturing provided those uses maintain harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and are in keeping with the architectural character and design standards of existing uses and development. The underlying Zoning District that guides the uses allowed within the parcel is the I-1 Limited Industrial District. A. Building and Landscaping Coverage – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requirements for the I-1 district allow a maximum building footprint of 30% and a minimum landscape area of 35 percent. Landscaping is defined as all plantings, including trees, grass, and shrubs. The table below identifies the proposed percentages. Proposed Master PUD (Sq. Ft.) Proposed Master PUD (PCT) Permitted (R-4 District) Structure Coverage 614,740 sq. ft. 18.16% Max. of 30% Landscape Coverage 1,610,953 sq. ft. 47.58% Min. of 35% B. Height – Flexibility Requested The proposed building has a flat roof, with a height of 40 feet. Maximum height in the I-1 district is 35 feet. The first floor of the building is 21’ in height. The remaining height is attributed the mechanical equipment penthouse, which encloses equipment that would typically be mounted on the roof. Flexibility is requested from the maximum height of 35 feet. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 3 of 6 C. Setbacks –Meets Requirements Setbacks in the I-1 District are 50 feet for the front yard, 20 feet for the side yard with minimum of 40 feet total for both side yards, and 20 feet for the rear yard. The proposed addition meets all of the required setbacks. 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Aesthetics – Meets Requirements Exterior elevation plans submitted by the Applicant indicate that the proposed addition will utilize precast panels and prefabricated metal panels complimentary in color and texture to the existing building. As a condition of approval, staff recommends that The Applicant submit a materials board to compare proposed materials against the existing buildings on campus. B. Lighting – Meets Requirements Architectural lighting strips are located in the south wall of the addition, and there is a wall mounted light on the west side of the building. In addition, parking lot lighting on the south and east side of the building is proposed. Given the minimal outdoor lighting for the project and the distance from the adjacent residential areas, staff do not anticipate any issues with regard to lighting. However, as a condition of approval staff recommends the Applicant be required to provide photometric calculations for the lighting at the west property line. C. Screening and Fencing –Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. According to City Code Section 1325.05, subd. 4, mechanical equipment requires screening to be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets and differing land uses. In addition to the mechanical penthouse, the Applicant is proposing a parapet wall to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. The height of this wall has been increased to meet the noise standards. D. Tree Preservation –Meets Requirements A Tree Preservation Plan is required as part of an application when City grading permit or erosion control permit is required. The Tree Protection Plan submitted by the Applicant shows that 95 caliper inches of significant trees are set for removal. The Ordinance allows 10% (36.2 caliper inches) to be removed without replacement. The remaining 58.8 caliper inches to be removed must be replaced at a ratio of 1 caliper inch for each 2 inches removed. The Applicant is required to replant 29.4 caliper inches. The proposed landscaping plan identifies a total of 63.5 caliper inches of replacement trees. The proposed replacement trees included a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees. As a condition of approval, staff recommends a landscaping letter of credit or escrow be required. E. Parking, Traffic, and Circulation – Meets Requirements The Applicant is proposing to provide an additional 10 parking spaces, and submitted Proof of Parking calculations for an addition 88 spaces. The addition of 17,450 square feet of floor area requires an additional 18 spaces. The new spaces plus proof of parking meets this requirement. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 4 of 6 2.1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Under Section 1355.06 subd.4, an application for an amendment shall be administered in the same manner as required for a new application. Any structural alteration, enlargement or intensification change in site plan, or similar change not specially permitted, shall require City Council action and all procedures shall apply as if a new application were being requested; provided, however, that when such changes are deemed to be insignificant by the Zoning Administrator, the requirements of a public hearing may be waived. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment D) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1. The Boston Scientific campus at 4100 Hamline Avenue North operates under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was originally approved in 2002 for the Guidant Corporation. 2. The last update to the PUD and Campus Master Plan took place in in 2020 when the City approved a loading dock addition to the South side of Building 10 (Planning Case 19- 018). 3. New building construction or site modification identified on the approved Campus Master Plan requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 4. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 5. The proposed addition to Building 14 is not shown on the current Master Plan. 6. A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 7. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 7, 2021. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 5 of 6 Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. x Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-001 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of 4100 Hamline Avenue, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the April 7, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. All conditions of the original Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the February 17, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 3. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 5. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 6. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 7. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a materials board to be approved in writing by staff. 10. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. The applicant must provide photometric calculations for the lighting at the west property line. 11. Once construction is complete and the equipment is operational, the Applicant must conduct a noise study to ensure the facility does not exceed maximum noise standards. If necessary, steps shall be taken to correct any deficiencies. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 6 of 6 x Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 001 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of 4100 Hamline Avenue, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the April 7, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. x Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-001 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of 4100 Hamline Avenue, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-001 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of 4100 Hamline Avenue:a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments The Applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting via Zoom on December 15, 2020. Following the meeting, a letter signed by several residents of the residential area to the west was submitted (see Attachment E). The Applicant reviewed these comments and addressed them at a City Council Workshop on March 22, 2021, and submitted the attached letter (see Attachment F). The applicant was planning to have an informal meeting with several residents on March 31, 2021. Any information received as a result will be presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting. Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out on Friday, March 26, 2021. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 9, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by May 8, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Application Narrative B. Location Map C. Submittal Documents D. Engineering Comment letter E. Neighborhood Letter F. Response Letter G. Summary of Noise Study H. City Council Presentation Attachment A Location Map Legend Municipal Boundary City Mask March 31, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink 1 in = 376 ft ±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lectricalThomas HoppertPhone: 612/465-7645Email: Thomas.Hoppert@dunhameng.com&,9,/(1*,1((565HKGHUDQG$VVRFLDWHV)HGHUDO'ULYH6XLWH(DJDQ013KRQH )D[ /$1'6&$3($5&+,7(&7'DPRQ)DUEHU6WK$YHQXH6RXWK6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV013KRQH 352-(&76,7(1257+1257+(;,67,1*%8,/',1*%8,/',1*$'',7,210ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ0-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,'#/6%2Ï3(%%4"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,230Ï02/*%#4Ï.5-"%2"/34/.Ï3#)%.4)&)#"5),$).'ÏÏ%80!.3)/./2&$7,210$3'2&80(173$&.$*(6+((7,1'(;'5$:,1*6<0%2/6.(<3/$1)335%$*!.5!29Ï ÏÏ0!#+!'%#)49Ï35"-)44!,352-(&77($0.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!, Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.4 Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.4 #)49Ï35"-)44!,Ï Ï2%6Ï'5$:,1*6 ,668(66+((7121$0(6&+(0$7,&35,&,1*3.*&,7<68%0,77$/&,7<68%0,77$/5(9,6('00 GENERALG000 COVER SHEETXXXG010 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN XG020 PARKING CALCULATIONS X05 SURVEYSURVEY SURVEYXX10 ARCHITECTURAL SITEA001 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN X X X20 CIVILC1 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN X X XC2 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN X X XC3 UTILITY PLANXXXC4 DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS X X XC5 CITY DETAILSXX25 LANDSCAPEL001 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN X XL010 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SCHEDULE XL060 LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE X XL110 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN X XL160 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN X XL161 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN - SCREENING X XL210 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ENLARGEMENT PLAN X XL500 HARDSCAPE DETAILSXL530 PLANTING DETAILSX40 ARCHITECTURALA100.1 FLOOR PLANSXA400.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS XA450 3D REFERENCE VIEW X XA455 RENDERINGSXA512 WALL SECTIONSXX85 ELECTRICALE001 PHOTOMETRIC PLANXREVISED CITY SUBMITTAL Attachment C BUILDINGS J & M ROTATED 90° RELATIVE TO PRIOR PUD TO ACCOMMODATE NEW BLDG. O SCOPE. NO CHANGE IN AREA OR HEIGHT.0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,'#!-053Ï-!34%20,!.#)49Ï35"-)44!,&$03860$67(53/$11257+ 6&$/( .O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!,38''$7$7$%/( 0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,'0!2+).'#!,#5,!4)/.3"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!,3$5.,1*&$/&8/$7,2161257+ 5$03/EEKsd%XLOGLQJ%XLOGLQJ%XLOGLQJ .2 *[F123EXISTING WETLAND19' - 0"18' - 5"13' - 4"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"78910,1129$7,21:$<51277714141414141(:(;67/,0,762)&216758&7,21/,0,762)&216758&7,21/,0,762)&216758&7,21/,0,762)&216758&7,211515510 STALLS4441411111143' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"65' - 0"12 @ 9'-0" EA.108' - 0"NOTE: PARKING STALLS SHOWN HALFTONE ARE FUTURE PROOF OF PARKING. 25' - 0"8' - 6"11' - 0"5!$$)4)/.%8)34).'Ï"5),$).'1614' - 0"1710' - 0"181818*(1(5$/127(6 6,7(3/$11. REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION.2. 'LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION' INDICATES APPROXIMATE EXTENTS OF CIVIL, LANDSCAPE, AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS FOR UTILITY WORK THAT MAY EXTEND BEYOND THIS BOUNDARY. 0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ0-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!!2#()4%#452!,Ï3)4%0,!."5),$).'ÏÏ$%3)'.$%6%,/0-%.41" = 20'-0"6,7(3/$1 (;3$16,211257+.(<127(66,7(3/$112 '(6&5,37,211 EXISTING GENERATOR2 EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER3 NEW ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER W/ PRECAST PAD4 POROUS GRID TURF DRIVING SURFACE5 CONCRETE STOOP6 9' X 18' PARKING STALL, TYPICAL.7 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK8 EXISTING ASPHALT PATH9 EXISTING LANDSCAPING10 EXISTING SUNSHADE11 MODULAR RETAINING WALL.12 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPICAL14 LANDSCAPED AREA15 EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN16 EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN17 HALFTONE AREA INDICATES EXTENTS OF SNOWMELT SYSTEM.SEE MECHANICAL.18 42" H. PREFINISHED ALUMINUM FENCE W/ VERTICAL SLATS..O $ATE $ESCRIPTION 3#(%-!4)#Ï02)#).'Ï0+' #)49Ï35"-)44!, Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.4 Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.44"$ #)49Ï35"-)44!,Ï Ï2%6ÏSKYWAY AND ON-GRADECONNECTION TOBUILDINGS 3, 10 & 14NEW BLDG 14 MAIN ENTRYPEDESTRIAN PATHSOUTDOOR SEATINGPEDESTRIAN ON-GRADECONNECTION TOBUILDINGS 9 AND 1402/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL 01/19/20216131.022.11I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberNameProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2018. All rights reserved.ConsultantsC1No. Date DescriptionSITE DEMOLITION PLAN01/04/2021CITY SUBMITTAL2BUILDING 14Nicholas P. Adam43856FEBRUARY 5, 2021BUILDING 14EXPANSIONBJQNPANOT FORCONSTRUCTION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/19/202195% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, &EROSION CONTROL PLANI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberNameProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2018. All rights reserved.ConsultantsC2No. Date Description2BUILDING 14Nicholas P. Adam43856BJQNPA6131.022.1101/04/2021BUILDING 14EXPANSION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENTNOT FORCONSTRUCTION01/19/2021CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/202195% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTALFEBRUARY 5, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberNameProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2018. All rights reserved.ConsultantsC3No. Date DescriptionUTILITY PLAN2BUILDING 14Nicholas P. Adam43856BJQNPA6131.022.1101/04/2021BUILDING 14EXPANSIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/19/2021CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/202195% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTALFEBRUARY 5, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberNameProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2018. All rights reserved.ConsultantsC4No. Date DescriptionDETAILS &SPECIFICATIONS2BUILDING 14Nicholas P. Adam43856BJQNPAFRAME6131.022.1101/04/2021BUILDING 14EXPANSIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/19/2021CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/202195% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTALFEBRUARY 5, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberNameProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2018. All rights reserved.ConsultantsC5No. Date DescriptionCITY DETAILS2BUILDING 14Nicholas P. Adam43856BJQNPA6131.022.1101/04/2021BUILDING 14EXPANSIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/19/2021CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/202195% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTALFEBRUARY 5, 2021 4-5" Boxelder RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL ADJUST CASTING TOP 983.75 2 29901000/EEKsd/KT-02T-03T-04T-05T-06T-07T-08T-09T-10T-11T-12T-13T-14T-15T-16T-17T-18T-19T-20T-21T-22T-23T-24T-25T-26T-27T-28T-29T-30T-31T-32T-33T-34T-35T-36T-01T-37T-38T-39T-40T-41T-42T-43T-44T-45T-46T-47T-48T-49T-50T-51T-52PROPOSED PARKING LOTPROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONINNOVATION WAYENTRY DRIVEEXISTING PATHEXISTING PARKINGEXISTING BUILDING EXISTING CONTOURSPROPOSED CONTOURSEXISTING SIDEWALKINFILTRATION AREAINFILTRATION AREATREE PRESERVATION CRITERIA PER CITY OF ARDENHILLS CODE OF ORDINANCE (SEC. 1325.055):MITIGATION OR "REPLACEMENT TREES" ARE REQUIREDWHEN 10% OF THE SITE'S TOTAL CAL INCHES AREREMOVED. DISEASED, NUISANCE, OR TREES BELOW THE"SIGNIFICANT TREE" SIZE DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.(1325.055 SUBD. 5)SIGNIFICANT TREES ARE DEFINED AS THE FOLLOWING:HARDWOOD: GREATER THAN 10 CAL INSOFTWOOD: GREATER THAN 12 CAL INEVERGREEN: GREATER THAN 10' HGTREPLACE CAL IN OF REMOVED TREES AT A RATE OF 1:2CAL INCHES. (SEC. 1325.055 SUBD. 6)TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONSITE TOTAL CAL INCHES362REMOVED CAL INCHES9510% ALLOWED REMOVAL36.2REPLACEMENT CAL INCHES58.8REQUIRED REPLACEMENTS RATIO (1:2)29.4TOTAL REPLACED CAL INCHES63.5SYMBOLDESCRIPTIONSPECIESCAL/SIZEDEMO ELM 3DEMO PINE 1DEMO PINE 1DEMO PINE 1PRESERVE OAK 2PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 4PRESERVE SPRUCE 3PRESERVE SPRUCE 3PRESERVE TREE LILAC 4RELOCATE PINE 4DEMO SPRUCE 4RELOCATE PINE 4DEMO SPRUCE 4DEMO ELM 4DEMO PINE 4DEMO SPRUCE 4DEMO PINE 5RELOCATE PINE 6DEMO SPRUCE 4RELOCATE PINE 5DEMO SPRUCE 4DEMO SPRUCE 3RELOCATE PINE 7DEMO COTTONWOOD 13DEMO COTTONWOOD 12DEMO SPRUCE 10DEMO SPRUCE 12DEMO SPRUCE 14DEMO SPRUCE 4DEMO SPRUCE 7PRESERVE SPRUCE 10PRESERVE SPRUCE 12PRESERVE ASH 10PRESERVE ELM 10PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 13PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 24PRESERVE ELM 12PRESERVE ASH 16PRESERVE BOXWOOD 12PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 12PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 12PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 12PRESERVE COTTONWOOD 13PRESERVE SPRUCE 5PRESERVE SPRUCE 5PRESERVE SPRUCE 4T-01T-02T-03T-04T-05T-06T-07T-08T-09T-10T-11T-12T-13T-14T-15T-16T-17T-18T-19T-20T-21T-22T-23T-24T-25T-26T-27T-28T-29T-30T-31T-32T-33T-34T-35T-36T-37T-38T-39T-40T-41T-42T-43T-44T-45T-46T-47T-48T-49T-50T-51T-52TREE PRESERVATION SCHEDULEProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/19/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/2021 95% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021 REVISED CITY SUBMITTALTREE PRESERVATIONPLANL001N 016328TREE PRESERVATION PLANSCALE 1:161 BOLLARDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTYDETAILMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURER PRODUCT/MODEL COLOR/FINISHBOLLARD TYPE 1: LIGHTED BOLLARD186/L500 LIGHTED BOLLARD BEGA77 342BLACKMINERAL MULCHSYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTYDETAILMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURER PRODUCT/MODEL COLOR/FINISHMINERAL MULCH TYPE 1 2.15 CY 1.5" ANGULAR ROCK 3" DEEP DRESSER TRAP 1 1/2" DIA ROCK GREY/CLEAN WASHEDPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTYDETAILMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURER PRODUCT/MODEL COLOR/FINISH COMMENTSPAVING TYPE 1 - CONCRETE WALK 4,644 SF 1/L500 CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE STANDARD GRAY / BROOM FINSIH SEE CIVIL FOR PAVING & SUBBASETHICKNESSESPAVING TYPE 2 - CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS 1,119 SF 3/L500 CONCRETE UNIT PAVER, SAND SETTING BEDAND COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE &SUBGRADE.BELGARD HOLLAND PLUS60MM FACE PLUS,4X8" NOMINACHARCOALSITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTYDETAILMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURER PRODUCT/MODEL COLOR/FINISH COMMENTSDINING TABLES AND CHAIRS10DINING TABLES AND CHAIRS NIC - BY OWNERREUSE EXISTING FURNITUREWOOD TOP65/L500 BACKLESS BENCH- CAST ALUMIMUN & WOODSLATLANDSCAPE FORMS, FORMS ANDSURFACE, OR APPROVED EQUALMODIFIED STANDARDIPEWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTYDETAILMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURER PRODUCT/MODEL COLOR/FINISHWALL TYPE 1 - PRECAST SEATWALL86 LF4/L500 PRECAST CONCRETE SEAT WALL, OVERCONCRETE SUB SLAB, OVER COMPACTEDAGGREGATE, COMPACTED SUBGRADEARTSTONE, WAUSAU TILE, ORAPPROVED EQUALPRECAST CONCRETE, 2`W X 18"H TO BE SELECTED FROM SAMPLE PALETTEBO-01MM-01P-01P-02SF-01SF-02WL-01MATERIALS SCHEDULEProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/04/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSIONCITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPEMATERIALSSCHEDULESL010 TREESCODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. QTYPRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE12-12PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE14-14DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYCO CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS / COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL. B&B3QB QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL. B&B3TI-BTILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD` / BOULEVARD LINDEN 2.5" CAL. B&B8EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYJEJUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA / EASTERN RED CEDAR 8` HEIGHT B&B3PI-PPINUS PONDEROSA / PONDEROSA PINE 12` HEIGHT B&B5PS PINUS STROBUS / WHITE PINE 8` HEIGHT B&B3TO THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / WHITE CEDAR 8` HEIGHT B&B6ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYAG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` / CLUMP SERVICEBERRY 10` HT, CLUMP B&B6RELOCATED TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYRT(RELOCATED) PINUS RESINOSA / (RELOCATED) RED PINE15` HT.MACHINE MOVED5SHRUB AREAS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYDECIDUOUS SHRUB2,713 SF-2,713 SFGROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. QTYSEED MIX - WET MEADOW11,229 SF-11,229 SFSEED MIX - WOODLAND EDGE30,412 SF-30,412 SFSEED MIX - TURF6,229 SF-6,229 SFPLANT SCHEDULE^zDK> ^Z/Wd/KE ^W / ^ WZ ^ Zs DK Z >Kd EKdWW>/> dzW dͲϬϭ DK >Dϯ ,ZtKKdͲϬϮ DK W/E ϭ s Z'Z EdͲϬϯ DK W/E ϭ s Z'Z EdͲϬϰ DK W/E ϭ s Z'Z EdͲϬϱ WZ ^ Zs K<Ϯ,ZtKKdͲϬϲ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϬϳ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϬϴ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϬϵ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϬ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϭ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϮWZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϯ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϯ s Z'Z EdͲϭϰ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϯ s Z'Z EdͲϭϱ WZ ^ Zs dZ >/> ϰ ^K&dtKKdͲϭϲ Z >Kd W/E ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϳ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϴ Z >Kd W/E ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϭϵ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϮϬ DK >Dϰ ,ZtKKdͲϮϭ DK W/E ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϮϮ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϮϯ DK W/E ϱ s Z'Z EdͲϮϰZ >Kd W/E ϲ s Z'Z EdͲϮϱ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϮϲ Z >Kd W/E ϱ s Z'Z EdͲϮϳ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϮϴ DK ^WZh ϯ s Z'Z EdͲϮϵ Z >Kd W/E ϳ s Z'Z EdͲϯϬ DK KddKEtKK ϭϯ ^K&dtKKdͲϯϭ DK KddKEtKKϭϮ^K&dtKKdͲϯϮ DK ^WZh ϭϬ s Z'Z EdͲϯϯ DK ^WZh ϭϮ s Z'Z EdͲϯϰ DK ^WZh ϭϰ s Z'Z EdͲϯϱ DK ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdͲϯϲ DK ^WZh ϳ s Z'Z EdͲϯϳ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϭϬ s Z'Z EdͲϯϴ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϭϮ s Z'Z EdͲϯϵ WZ ^ Zs ^, ϭϬ ,ZtKKdͲϰϬ WZ ^ Zs >D ϭϬ ,ZtKKdͲϰϭ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK ϭϯ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϮ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK Ϯϰ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϯ WZ ^ Zs >D ϭϮ ,ZtKKdͲϰϰ WZ ^ Zs ^, ϭϲ ,ZtKKdͲϰϱWZ ^ Zs KytKK ϭϮ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϲ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK ϭϮ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϳ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK ϭϮ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϴ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK ϭϮ ^K&dtKKdͲϰϵ WZ ^ Zs KddKEtKK ϭϯ ^K&dtKKdͲϱϬ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϱ s Z'Z EdͲϱϭWZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϱ s Z'Z EdͲϱϮ WZ ^ Zs ^WZh ϰ s Z'Z EdKd>^ ϮϮϮ ϵϱ Ϯϲ ϭϵ^/d dKd>>/E, ^ ϯϲϮZ DKs >/E, ^ ϵϱϭϬй>>Kt Z DKs>;ΑϭϯϮϱ͘Ϭϱϱ^h͘ϱͿϯϲ͘ϮZ YΖZ W> D Ed>/E, ^dϭ͗ϭZd/Kϱϴ͘ϴZ YΖZ W> D Ed^dϭ͗ϮZd/K;ΑϭϯϮϱ͘Ϭϱϱ^h͘ϲͿϮϵ͘ϰTREE PRESERVATION CRITERIA PER CITY OF ARDENHILLS CODE OF ORDINANCE (SEC. 1325.055):MITIGATION OR "REPLACEMENT TREES" ARE REQUIREDWHEN 10% OF THE SITE'S TOTAL CAL INCHES AREREMOVED. DISEASED, NUISANCE, OR TREES BELOW THE"SIGNIFICANT TREE" SIZE DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.(1325.055 SUBD. 5)SIGNIFICANT TREES ARE DEFINED AS THE FOLLOWING:HARDWOOD: GREATER THAN 10 CAL INSOFTWOOD: GREATER THAN 12 CAL INEVERGREEN: GREATER THAN 10' HGTREPLACE CAL IN OF REMOVED TREES AT A RATE OF 1:2CAL INCHES. (SEC. 1325.055 SUBD. 6)TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONSITE TOTAL CAL INCHES362REMOVED CAL INCHES9510% ALLOWED REMOVAL36.2REPLACEMENT CAL INCHES58.8REQUIRED REPLACEMENTS RATIO (1:2)29.4TOTAL REPLACED CAL INCHES63.5Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/19/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/2021 95% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021 REVISED CITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPEPLANTINGSCHEDULESL060TREE PRESERVATION TABULATION 1A400PROPOSED PARKINGCIVIL INFILTRATION AREASNOWSTORAGEEXISTING PARKINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONWETLANDWOODLANDP-01P-01PRESERVE EXISTING TREE (1)PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE (9)P-01PRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE (1)PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE (9)PROPOSED PARKINGCIVIL INFILTRATION AREASNOWSTORAGEEXISTING WALK TO SKYWAYEXISTING PARKINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONWETLANDWOODLANDPAVINGSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILPAVING TYPE 1 - CONCRETE WALK 1/L500P-01MATERIALS SCHEDULE - OVERALLProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/04/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSIONCITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPEPLANL110SEE ENLARGEMENT L210N 016328LANDSCAPE PLANSCALE 1:161 4-5" Boxelder 3" Spruce 3" Spruce 4" Spruce 4" Spruce 4" Spruce 4"Spruce 4"Spruce 4"Spruce 4" Spruce 1" Pine 1"Pine 1"Pine 3"Elm 2"Oak 4"Lilac RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL ADJUST CASTINGTOP 983.75 2 29901000PROPOSED PARKINGCIVIL INFILTRATION AREASNOWSTORAGEEXISTING WALK TO SKYWAYEXISTING PARKINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONWETLANDWOODLANDSEED MIX - TURF (6,229 sf)PRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE (1)PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE (9)3 - AG1 - QB1 - QB1 - QB6 - TI-B1 - TI-B3 - AGPRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE (8)PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE (3)PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE (2)3 - PS5 - TO3 - JE1 - TI-B3 - COPRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE (2)TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAME12 PRESERVE EXISTING DECID TREE12 -14 PRESERVE EXISTING CONIF TREE14 -DECIDUOUS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECO 3 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS / COMMON HACKBERRYQB 3 QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAKTI-B 8 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD` / BOULEVARD LINDENEVERGREEN TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEJE 3 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA / EASTERN RED CEDARPI-P 5 PINUS PONDEROSA / PONDEROSA PINEPS 3 PINUS STROBUS / WHITE PINETO 6 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / WHITE CEDARORNAMENTAL TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAG 6 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` RELOCATED TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMERT 5 (RELOCATED) PINUS RESINOSA / (RELOCATED) RED PINSHRUB AREASCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAME2,713 SF DECIDUOUS SHRUB2,713 SF -GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAME11,229 SF SEED MIX - WET MEADOW11,229 SF -30 412 SF SEED MIX - WOODLAND EDGEPLANT LEGEND - L160Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/19/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/2021 95% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021 REVISED CITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPE PLANTINGPLANL160N 016328LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANSCALE 1:161SEE L161 UCTION5 - RT5 - PI-PEVERGREEN TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.PI-P 5 PINUS PONDEROSA / PONDEROSA PINE 12` HEIGHT B&BRELOCATED TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.RT 5 (RELOCATED) PINUS RESINOSA / (RELOCATED) RED PINE 15` HT. MACHINE MOVEDPLANT LEGEND - L161Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/19/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSION95% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT01/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTAL01/19/2021 95% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT02/05/2021 REVISED CITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPE PLANTINGPLAN - SCREENINGL161N 016328LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN - SCREENINGSCALE 1:161SEE L160 P-01P-02SF-01WL-01SF-02SF-02SF-02SF-02WL-01SF-02P-01P-01P-01MM-01MM-01SF-02BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BO-01BOLLARDSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILBOLLARD TYPE 1: LIGHTED BOLLARD 6/L500MINERAL MULCHSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILMINERAL MULCH TYPE 1PAVINGSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILPAVING TYPE 1 - CONCRETE WALK 1/L500PAVING TYPE 2 - CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS 3/L500SITE FURNITURESYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILDINING TABLES AND CHAIRSWOOD TOP 5/L500WALLSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONDETAILWALL TYPE 1 - PRECAST SEATWALL 4/L500BO-01MM-01P-01P-02SF-01SF-02WL-01MATERIALS SCHEDULE - PLAZAProject No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/04/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSIONCITY SUBMITTALLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENT PLANL210N 0510LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLANSCALE 1:51 Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/04/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSIONCITY SUBMITTALHARDSCAPEDETAILSL500CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE CIVILAGGREGATE BASE;SEE CIVIL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADEHOLD FINISHED GRADE 1" BELOWPAVING AT TURF CONDITION, TYP.PREPARED SUBGRADE; SEE CIVIL.1/4" x 1" SAWED CONTROL JOINT,TYP. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS.1/2" EXPANSION JOINT AT WALL,CURB OR OTHER PAVING CONDITIONCONDITION VARIES; SEE PLANTINGPLANDETAIL - PAVING TYPE 1 - CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN PAVING1" = 1'-0"6"2L500P-19 117-181MASTIC SEALANT, PER SPECIFICATIONS;COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVING. WIDTHTO DEPTH RATIO OF MASTIC TO BE PERMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.TYPICAL EDGE, FORM AT 90 DEGREES TOAPPEAR SIM. TO CONTROL JOINT EDGETYPICAL CONCRETE PAVINGCLOSED CELL FOAM BACKER RODEXPANSION JOINT TO OCCUR 20' O.C. MAX.AND AT CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, RAMPS,WALLS, AND OTHER VERTICALOBSTRUCTIONS. REFER TO PLAN FORLOCATIONSPREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINTFILLER PER SPECIFICATIONSDEPTH OF CUT TO BE 1/3THE DEPTH OF SLAB; MAKEALL SAW CUTS WITHIN 12HR. OF CONCRETE POURTYPICAL SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTTYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT - ENLARGED1/4" THICK CUTDETAIL - TYPICAL CONCRETE JOINTINGNTS2P-19 117-125.85" UNIT PAVERS W/ GRANITE DUSTSWEPT JOINTS, SET HAND TIGHT1" COMPACTED 3/8" WASHEDGRANITE CHIP BASE - NO FINES10" COMPACTED 1 1/2" WASHEDGRANITE CHIP BASE - NO FINESPREPARED SUBGRADE, EXCEPTWHEN WITHIN EXISTING TREEDRIPLINE; COMPACT TO 90%PROCTOR DENSITYBUILDINGFINAL ELEVATION OF PLANTING SOIL 2INCHES BELOW FINISH GRADE OFPAVING. APPLY MULCH AND TAPERDEPTH TO 1/2" MIN. BELOW ADJACENTPAVING AT EDGE. HOLD MULCH CLEAROF PLANT FOLIAGE AND STEMS/TRUNKS,TYP.EDGERPLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADEEXPANSION JOINT2" COMPACTED 3/4" WASHEDGRANITE CHIP BASE - NO FINESDETAIL - PAVING TYPE 2 - PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE UNIT PAVING1" = 1'-0"P-19 117-3633'-0"1'-6"2'-0" MAXHEIGHT1'-0"2'-10 3/8"10'-6"SECTIONELEVATION3'-0"5L500DETAIL-WALL TYPE 1 PRECAST WALL WITH WOOD TOP3/4" = 1'-0"ALIGN TOP OF BENCH WITHTOP OF ADJACENT WALL4P-19 117-682'-1134"58" BEVELED EDGE2'-11 3/4"5'-3"3"ALUMINUM FRAMECENTER SUPPORT(SKATEBOARD DETERRENT)316 STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS5'-3"NOTES:1. WOOD BOARDS ARE TO HAVE 1/8" R EASEDEDGES THROUGHOUT. MOUNT EACH BOARDTO CASTING.2. METAL FRAME PIECES ARE TO BE ALUMINUMBY MANUFACTURER.3. ALL HARDWARE TO BE STAINLESS STEEL (SS).4. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGSFOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION.SS PAN HEAD SCREWS TO SECURE BOARDS1/2" CLEARANCE HOLES FOR 3/8" SS ANCHORS2-1/2" X 1/4" GALV STEEL STRAPSWOOD SEAT SECTION, ATTACH ANCHORSTHROUGH SKATEBOARD DETERRENTSPRECAST CONCRETE BENCHDETAIL - WOOD TOP AT PRECAST BENCH MOD STD3/4" = 1'-0"1/2" FOR MOUNTING HARDWARE3 1/2"INSIDE SLAT 1 1/2" TYP1/4"TYP1"3/8"1/2" FOR MOUNTING HARDWAREENLARGED WOOD SLAT END VIEWASSEMBLYELEVATIONPLAN - WOOD SLATSPLAN - WOOD SLATS ANDFRAME UNDERSIDE5P-19 117-26LIGHT BOLLARD IN LANDSCAPE1" = 1'-0"1'-0"PAVING VARIES, SEE PLANBOLLARD, PER ELECTRICALTOP OF FOOTING TO MATCHELEVATION OF ADJACENT WALK, SEECIVIL FOR ELEVTIONS2"PLANTING VARIES,SEE PLAN ANDDETAILSP-19 117-996 Project No.Revisions1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP ArchitectsCertificationProject ForI hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.DateRegistration NumberSignatureDrawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described hereinincluding all technical drawings, graphics, and modelsthereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, withoutexpress written permission of RSP Architects. These areavailable for limited review and evaluation by clients,consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2016. All rights reserved.ConsultantsBUILDING 146131.022.11/19-117AMCE01/04/202110/09/2020 SCHEMATIC PRICING PKG.310 S 4th Ave Suite 7050MinneapolisMinnesota 55415612.332.752201/04/2021 CITY SUBMITTALNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONBUILDING 14EXPANSIONCITY SUBMITTALPLANTINGDETAILSL5301136" RADIUSDIG PLANTING PIT4" TO 6" DEEPERTHAN ROOT BALLUNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLYWITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALLDOES NOT SHIFT4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLPLANTING PIT TO BE TWOTO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETEROF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPEDPREPARED PLANTING SOILPER SPEC6' DIAMETERMULCH RINGREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLAN4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PITWITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PREPARED PLANTING SOILDETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION.12"HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. ORGREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPECP-19 117-081PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENTHERBICIDE3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMPREPARE BEDA MIN. 4" DEEPERTHAN ROOT BALL12" MIN.SPACINGDETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"EDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLANPLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBSSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADECONTAINER GROWN MATERIALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENEDP-19 117-072PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED1'-6"6"MIN.SPACINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOILPLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALSCONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTSH AND LOOSENEDEDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACTWITH PLANT STEMDETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING1 1/2" = 1'-0"3P-19 117-06DETAIL-TREE PROTECTION1 1/2" = 1'-0"10' MAX. BETWEENSUPPORTSNOTES:1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLEDPRIOR TO DEMOLITION IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ONPLANS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THEDURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.TREEPROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED ASNECESSARY WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT OR PARK VEHICLES IN TREEPROTECTION ZONES. THE FENCE SHALL PREVENTTRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OFTEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILESAND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHINTHE LIMITS OF PROTECTION.3. PLACE 4" DEPTH ORGANIC WOOD MULCH WITHINTREE PROTECTION FENCING FOR MOISTUREPRESERVATION4. PLACE TREE PROTECTION WITHIN DRIPLINE WHENFULL DRIPLINE PROTECTION IS NOT FEASIBLE DUE TOEXISTING PAVEMENT OR OTHER OBSTACLES.5. WHERE TREE PROTECTION OCCURS WITHIN DRIPLINEOF TREE, WRAP TRUNK W/ 2X4X8 BOARDS SECUREDTIGHTLY AROUND TRUNK WITH STRAP BINDINGS.6. NO PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED EXCEPT WHEREAPPROVED BY APPROVED LANSDCAPE ARCHITECTAND PERFORMED BY ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST.7. WHERE WORK OCCURS WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREE,ROOT PRUNING TO BE PERFORMED BY ISA CERTIFIEDARBORIST PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING.6' MININSTALL FENCE 6' MIN. OUTSIDEDRIPLINE OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN.DRIPLINE VARIESTENSIONER: COATED WIRE OR NYLONE ROPE TO KEEPFENCE TAUGHTTREE PROTECTION FENCING: 48" ORANGE SNOW FENCINGOR CONSTRUCTION GRADE CHAIN LINK. FASTEN TO POSTSWITH GALVANIZED WIRE TIESPOSTS: 7' U-CHANNEL 1.12 LBS/FOOT STRENGTH PAINTEDOR GALVANIZEDTREE PROTECTION SIGNAGE SPACED EVERY 50' ALONGFENCE. REFER TO SIGNAGE DETAILPERSPECTIVEPLAN4P-19 117-34 $=< ;::1A400.12A400.13A400.11257 SF14-1-4162)),&(198 SF14-1-4170$,1(/(&180 SF14-1-41887,/,7<159 SF14-1-451&255,'2554 SF14-1-453/,)7179 SF14-1-460*2:145 SF14-1-501$,5/2&.355 SF14-1-5030('&21)210 SF14-1-5047($05220476 SF14-1-505/2%%<117 SF14-1-5759(6762 SF14-1-5766(&85,7<104 SF14-1-5773$667+5866 SF14-1-5783+21(124 SF14-1-57967$,51354 SF14-1-598/,7+,809,713 SF14-1-6002&91383 SF14-1-601)250$7,21895 SF14-1-602&255,'258210 SF14-1-603'5<522052 SF14-1-4809(67198 SF14-1-581(0(5(/(&31' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"37' - 10"161' - 10"32' - 6"34' - 0"34' - 0"3' - 8 7/8"1' - 7 1/8"105' - 10"< ;:4A400.18109 SF14-2-4563(17+286(124 SF14-1-57967$,554 SF14-1-453/,)7170 SF14-2-596'$7$83631' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"32' - 6"34' - 0"AIR-COOLED CHILLER 1AIR-COOLED CHILLER 2AIR-COOLED CHILLER 3(FUTURE)0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!&,//2Ï0,!.3"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!,1/8" = 1'-0"&,7<68%0,77$/ ),567)/2253/$11/8" = 1'-0"&,7<68%0,77$/ 3(17+286( ),567)/225(/ =<3(17+286((/ ;::72:$//37+6 72:$//6( 72:$//( 72&$123< 726&5((1 MP-2MP-1MP-1PC-4MP-2MP-1PC-1CSIL-1PC-3MP-1&:1223PC-4CSIL-1&:),567)/225(/ 72:$//37+6 72:$//6( 72&$123< PC-1&:PC-2PC-3MP-1PC-2MP-11234444444PC-3),567)/225(/ $=<3(17+286((/ ;:72:$//: 72:$//37+6 726&5((1 PC-3MP-2MP-1PC-3PC-2MP-112BRICK @ EXISTING BUILDING 72:$//: 72:$//37+6 726&5((1 MP-1MP-2PARAPET BEYONDPC-30ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!%84%2)/2Ï%,%6!4)/.3"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!,1/8" = 1'-0"($67(/(9$7,21 &2/251/8" = 1'-0"6287+(/(9$7,21 &2/251/8" = 1'-0":(67(/(9$7,21 &2/251/8" = 1'-0"1257+ 6&5((1:$// &2/25.(<127(6(;7(5,25(/(9$7,2112 '(6&5,37,211 PREFABRICATED MITERED METAL PANEL CORNER2 PRECAST PANEL JOINT, TYPICAL3 PRECAST PANEL HORIZONTAL REVEAL4 ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING: 4" LINEAR LEDMATERIAL & SYSTEMS SCHEDULEMATERIAL TAG DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER STYLE COLOR/FINISH SIZE NOTESBK-1 FACE BRICKRED W/ FLASH - MATCH EXISTING UTILITY MATCH EXISTING BRICK OR SALVAGECSIL-1 CAST STONE SILL ROCKCAST SMOOTH CREME BUFFCW-1 CURTAIN WALL BUTT GLAZED CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI 2.5" x 7.5" MULLION W/ 1 5/16" LAMINATED INSULATED LOW-E GLAZINGCW-2 CURTAIN WALL BUTT GLAZED CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI 2.5" x7.5" MULLION W/ 1 5/16" LAMINATED INSULATED LOW-E GLAZING, 8" SNAPCOVERSMP-1 COMPOSITE METAL PANEL ALUCOBOND CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI WITH MINERAL WOOL INSULATION, SUBFRAMING SYSTEMMP-2 METAL PROFILE PANEL CENTRIA SUPER-RIB CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI 4" DEPTH, 22GAMP-2A METAL PROFILE PANEL CENTRIA SUPER-RIB CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI 4" DEPTH, 18GAPC-1 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WALL PANEL WELLS 12" INSULATED PANEL TINTED, ACID ETCHED 10' WIDE PANELPC-2 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WALL PANEL WELLS 12" INSULATED PANEL TINTED, FORM LINER HORIZONTAL REVEAL PATTERN 10' WIDE PANELPC-3 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WALL PANEL WELLS 12" INSULATED PANEL TINTED, FORM LINER VERTICAL REVEAL PATTERN 10' WIDE PANELPC-4 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WALL PANEL WELLS 6" ARCHITECTURAL PANEL TINTED, FORM LINER HORIZONTAL REVEAL PATTERNSF-1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT CENTER GLAZED CUSTOM COLOR: ASTI 1.75" x 4.5" MULLION W/ 1/4" TEMPERED GLAZINGSF-2 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BUTT GLAZED MILL FINISH 1.75" x 4.5" MULLION @DOOR, 1" TOP & BOTTOMTRACKSW/ 1/2" TEMPERED GLAZING 3$5.,1* 67$//6(;3$16,21(;,67,1*%8,/',1*3522)2)3$5.,1*0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!$Ï2%&%2%.#%Ï6)%7"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,'5()(5(1&(9,(:.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION 3#(%-!4)#Ï02)#).'Ï0+' #)49Ï35"-)44!, 0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!2%.$%2).'3"5),$).'Ï#)49Ï35"-)44!,.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!,12" = 1'-0"5(1'(5,1*6 9,(:6)520:$/.,1*3$7+12" = 1'-0"3(563(&7,9(9,(:)520($6712" = 1'-0"3(563(&7,9(9,(:)5206287+:(67 ),567)/225(/ 3(17+286((/ 72:$//37+6 19' - 8"3 3/4"PC-3COP-1),567)/225(/ 72:$//: 726&5((1 <3(17+286((/ 72:$//37+6 MP-2PC-53&:COP-1<3(17+286((/ 72:$//37+6 726&5((1 3' - 0 1/4"2' - 6" 2' - 6" 3' - 10 1/2" PRECAST SPANDREL JOINTMP-23&:COP-1 MECHUNITGALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM W/ GALVANIZED STEEL 1-1/2" GRATING. 42" H. 2-RAIL GUARDRAIL IN 8' TYPICAL SEGMENTS. SLEEVE GUARDRAIL POSTS TO FRAMING SO GUARDRAIL IS REMOVABLE. GALVANIZED STEEL STAIR W/ CHANNEL STRINGERS & BAR GRATE TREADSGALVANIZED STEEL STAIR W/ CHANNEL STRINGERS & BAR GRATE TREADSPC-5PC-5MP-2A 56<3(17+286((/ 72:$//37+6 MP-23&:56COP-156ROOF BASE FLASHINGFLASHING & THRESHOLD @ OVERHEAD COILING DOOR 3(17+286((/ PC-3MP-2MP-2AROOF WALL BASE FLASHING0ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ0-")-Ï"OSTONÏ3CIENTIFICÏ"LDGÏÏ"ATTERIESÏ%XPANSION!Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSIONRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/.*2&*!,!7!,,Ï3%#4)/.3"5),$).'ÏÏ$%3)'.$%6%,/0-%.4.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.4 Ï$%3)'.Ï$%6%,/0-%.41/2" = 1'-0":(67:$//6(&7,211/2" = 1'-0":(67:$//6(&7,211/2" = 1'-0"6(&7,21#*5,'<1/2" = 1'-0"6(&7,21#*5,'< 6&5((1:$//0(&+$1,&$/5$&.1/2" = 1'-0"6(&7,21#*5,'< 2+'2251/2" = 1'-0"6(&7,21#6&5((1:$//02/05/2021REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL -------1.0 1.01.2 1.41.5 1.81.8 2.32.0 2.82.3 3.3 4.9 3.62.5 3.7 5.1 4.12.1 3.0 4.1 5.2 5.2 4.6 3.33.3 5.27.49.4 8.6 6.3 4.3 2.0 2.6 3.3 3.9 3.9 3.5 2.83.5 4.9 6.7 7.67.45.84.2 2.12.02.12.52.82.92.62.33.1 4.2 5.3 5.9 5.8 4.9 3.8 3.0 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.02.6 3.3 3.94.44.2 3.7 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.92.12.52.83.13.13.12.92.72.42.11.91.81.61.52.41.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 3.24.53.7 3.6 2.2 3.7 2.8 1.6 1.7 3.7 5.91.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.2 1.7 3.0 2.81.11.21.31.52.12.52.01.91.81.61.41.5 4.14.01.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.9 3.4 1.8 2.8 1.8 3.4 7.0 8.2 8.0 9.41.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.11.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.01.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.42.0 2.1 2.2 3.55.52.7 2.8 3.14.56.7 2.63.8 3.9 4.2 5.6 6.0 2.85.35.45.25.7 7.43.17.0 7.0 6.4 6.5 7.9 3.28.7 8.3 7.1 6.8 8.0 3.10.6 8.2 6.55.76.7 2.03.64.71.43.8 4.6 5.34.0 9.2 11.44.2 8.1 11.04.76.0 8.43.7 9.6 13.22.9 5.8 8.61.9 1.9 1.9 3.9 10.3 10.8 4.12.3 4.1 4.1 2.4Calculation SummaryLabel CalcTypeUnitsAvg MaxMinAvg/Min Max/MinSITE CALCULATIONIlluminanceFc3.65 13.2 0.6 6.08 22.00Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyTagLabelArrangement LLFDescription42LV1FSM4LFL375LF35KSINGLE0.400 FSM4L-FL-375LF-35K-1C-UNV-LD1-G1-CP-WH-4Ft18BB184681_BEGA_IESSINGLE0.9008D7HC820D010-HM81520840-81WDCWFSINGLE0.900 HC820D010-HM81520840-81WDCWF4RR1IST-AF-1200-LED-E1-T4FTSINGLE0.900 IST-AF-1200-LED-E1-T4FT2AA1ecf-l-80l-1_2a-nw-g2-4SINGLE0.900 ECF-L-80L-1_2A-NW-G2-42AA1ecf-s-64l-1a-nw-g2-4-hisSINGLE0.900 ECF-S-64L-1A-NW-G2-4-HIS ;::(/(&75007(/(&20706%'2&.,1*67$7,21+3261(:87,/,7<75$16)250(5(;,67,1*87,/,7<75$16)250(5*(131/06%*(1*(1;;;%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%555555/9/9/9/9/9/9/9$$$$'''''';;55)8785(3$5.,1*/270ROJECTÏ.OÏ-ARSHALLÏ3TREETÏ.%-INNEAPOLIS-INNESOTAÏ ÏFAXWWWRSPARCHCOM230Ï!RCHITECTS#ERTIFICATION0ROJECTÏ&OR)ÏHEREBYÏÏCERTIFYÏÏTHATÏÏTHISÏÏPLAN ÏSPECIFICATION ÏÏORÏREPORTÏÏWASÏÏPREPAREDÏÏBYÏMEÏORÏUNDERÏMYÏDIRECTÏSUPERVISIONÏANDÏTHATÏÏ)ÏAMAÏÏDULYÏÏ,ICENSEDÏÏ!RCHITECTÏUNDERÏÏTHEÏÏLAWSÏÏOFÏÏTHEÏÏSTATEÏÏOFÏ-INNESOTA$ATEÏ3IGNED,ICENSEÏ.UMBER.AME$RAWNÏ"Y#HECKEDÏ"Y$ATE#ONSULTANTS./4)#%ÏÏÏ4HEÏDESIGNSÏSHOWNÏANDÏDESCRIBEDÏHEREINÏÏINCLUDINGÏALLÏÏTECHNICALÏÏDRAWINGS ÏÏGRAPHICS ÏÏANDÏÏMODELSÏÏTHEREOF ÏÏAREÏPROPRIETARYÏANDÏCANNOTÏBEÏCOPIED ÏDUPLICATEDÏORÏCOMMERCIALLYÏEXPLOITED ÏÏINÏÏÏWHOLEÏÏORÏÏÏINÏÏPART ÏÏWITHOUTÏÏÏEXPRESSÏÏWRITTENÏPERMISSIONÏOFÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏ4HESEÏAREÏAVAILABLEÏFORÏLIMITEDÏREVIEWÏÏANDÏÏEVALUATIONÏÏBYÏÏCLIENTS ÏÏCONSULTANTS ÏCONTRACTORS ÏGOVERNMENTÏÏAGENCIES ÏÏVENDORSÏANDÏOFFICEÏÏPERSONNELÏÏONLYÏINÏACCORDANCEÏWITHÏTHISÏ.OTICEÆÏÏÏ#OPYRIGHTÏ230Ï!RCHITECTSÏÏÏ!LLÏRIGHTSÏRESERVED3HEETÏ)SSUESÏÏ2EVISIONS./4Ï&/2#/.3425#4)/.ÏÏ!-#<2EVITÏ0ROJECTS<-%0Ï?$RYÏ2OOMÏ%XPANSION?THOMASHOPPERTRVT"5),$).'Ï%80!.3)/. 4#(*,%%,%#42)#!,Ï3)4%0(/4/-%42)#Ï0,!.#)49Ï35"-)44!, (/(&75,&$/6,7(3/$1.O $ATE $ESCRIPTION #)49Ï35"-)44!, Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 17, 2021 TO: Mike Mrosla, County Development Manager / City Planner FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director SUBJECT: Engineering Plan Review Comments Boston Scientific – Building 14 Engineering staff reviewed the response of the Site Development Plans for Boston Scientific Building 14 dated February 5, 2021 and have noted the following information is remaining with comments: 1. Sheet C2 – Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan: A. The outlet pipe for the existing stormwater basin located north of the existing building 14 currently discharges to the west. Sediment has accumulated downstream of the outlet pipe, resulting in stormwater discharge flowing onto the public trail system. The proposed site improvements must include clearing and minor grading downstream of this pipe outlet to prevent flooding of the public trail. Provide updates to the City Public Works Department until issue is corrected. B. Show location on rock construction entrance. C. Engineering plans shall be provided to the City for the proposed retaining walls within the site at the time of building permit application. D. Upon completion of grading, an as-built grading plan certifying the actual grades of the site and lowest exposed structure elevation shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Attachment D Page 2 of 2 2. Sheet C3 – Utility Plan: A. As-built drawings of water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage facilities shall be provided to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. B. The applicant shall provide fire flow calculations for the proposed structure, including maximum fire flow demand and the capacity of the proposed water main configuration. Submit to Fire Marshal for approval and send verification to City Public Works Department. C. Property owner will be required to enter into a stormwater facility maintenance and easement agreement as a condition of site plan approval. The standard form of the agreement is available from the Public Works Department. 3. Additional General Comments A. The project will require multiple permits and charges, including but not limited to, utility permits, grading and erosion control permit, NPDES permit, Water Connection Fee, Water Availability Fee, Sewer Connection Fee, and Sewer Availability Fee as provided in the current City fee schedule, as well as Metropolitan Council SAC charges, and an escrow for engineering review and inspection as provided in a development agreement. Waiting for determinations by May 2021 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Swearingen at 651-792-7847. 1 | Page Arden Hills City Council February 17, 2021 Bryan Mills Sarah Mills 1280 Wynridge Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 February 17, 2021 Arden Hills City Council 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Expansion of Building 14 on Boston Scientific Campus Mr. Mayor: David Grant City Council Members: Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung, and Steve Scott Planning Commission Members: Paul Vijums (Chair), Steven Jones, James Lambeth, Jonathan Wicklund, Subbaya Subramanian, Clayton Zimmerman, Marcie Jefferys, Kurtis Weber We are writing you today to raise concerns regarding the proposed Boston Scientific expansion of Building 14. As longtime residents and community members of Arden Hills, we and you appreciate the relatively small, quiet, and safe community we all call home. We are concerned that this proposed expansion is inconsistent with that standard. Boston Scientific operates on a large 93-acre campus. Tall, noisy, 24/7 operations must be located within the central portion of campus NOT adjacent to residential family homes. After attendance and careful evaluation of the proposal brought forward during the community meeting on December 15th, 2020 we feel it is imperative to highlight our current and future concerns regarding the Building 14 proposal. 1. Noise: The proposed expansion is immediately adjacent to single-family residential homes and its direct negative impact on their lives needs to be understood. This is different than other campus expansions due to its present and future impact on residential homeowners. As presented, Boston Scientific plans to expand upon an already out-of-compliance 24-hour-a- day 7-day-a-week operation. Summarized below are the activities out of compliance with City of Arden Hills code: a. Garbage: Emptying the oversized compactor occurs daily between the hours of 5:20 – 6:00 a.m. on the north western most position of the property, a site not currently screened by any physical structure. This is not only unsettling but an unwanted daily alarm for the closest residents. This continues to be out of compliance for the City of Arden Hills Code: 660.04 Collection and Licensing Subd 4. I. Subd. 4. No person, company, or corporation shall collect or remove garbage, refuse, recyclable materials, or other mixed municipal solid waste in any residential district or from any property sharing a property line with a residential district in which the collection can cause a negative impact to the adjacent residential district $WWDFKPHQW( 2 | Page Arden Hills City Council February 17, 2021 (i.e., noise, odors), except between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. We brought this to Mike Mrosla’s attention in December 2020 and he stated it would be immediately addressed but even after 60+ days this remains a persistent issue. b. Commercial HVAC Equipment: Current operations entail the air handling units running 24/7. Varying degrees of noise are emitted from these pieces of equipment and that needs to be studied in their current, future, and max-output operation for noise emission. Adding to the current noise levels will be two and likely three additional pieces of equipment mounted to the roof structure. The increase in noise of these running simultaneously is yet to be understood. The new height would be unobstructed by trees and noise will surely increase the noise level in surrounding neighborhoods. c. Argon Gas Storage: Refills occur on a regular basis but are not uncommonly completed prior to 6:00 AM on weekdays. The hissing sound is clearly audible during these events and is also out of compliance of City of Arden Hills Code: 1325.06 Subd. 2 I. Off-Street Loading. Off-street loading space shall be provided in connection with any use which requires the receipt or distribution of materials by truck. Where noise from such loading space is audible in a residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. d. Previous Noise Studies: Noise studies were conducted by a contracted third party due to a previous Building 14 expansion and the data findings were conclusive; Boston Scientific was NOT in compliance of state noise laws at time of study. Mitigation steps occurred via plantings but some of those plantings have since died and been removed. No additional plantings were completed to replace those trees nor have follow up noise studies been shared with the community. Independently contracted noise studies of a statistically significant data set should be conducted, reviewed, and shared with the community prior to voting on any current or future proposals. The data collection needs to occur where the noise is impacting the adjacent residents (on decks, outside 2nd or 3rd floor bedroom windows or in back yards NOT buried in the woods as proposed along the BSCI property lines). When the study occurs, you will capture the above activities. Time stamped audio recordings have already been captured to validate the concerns. 2. Building height/visual pollution: Building 14’s existing structure sits at a height of 21 feet. The proposed expansion will almost double in height to a proposed height of 40 feet and sit exposed as a visual monstrosity. It should be noted that a significant number of mature trees were removed from the southwestern portion in the summer of 2019. These stumps can be observed from the community trail and would have considerably obstructed the view of this proposed expansion. A revision to the proposed building height should be made to remain consistent with the existing Building 14 structure; the City of Arden Hills should not grant a variance to the current zoning maximum height restriction of 35 feet. a. City of Arden Hills Code: 1320.06 District Requirements Chart: 3 | Page Arden Hills City Council February 17, 2021 As described by City of Arden Hills Planning Manager, Mike Mrosla, we see this height variance as a “give and take” option where we will “give” the 40’ variance. We don’t see any way “taking” additional plantings can ever screen or obstruct a 40’ building from the residentially exposed side of the property. Additionally, these plantings will take decades to make any considerable impact on the proposed expansion. 3. Expanded Lithium Battery Manufacturing: An environmental and safety specialist was present during the community presentation and spoke vaguely about the current and future impact of BSCI’s battery manufacturing operations. The vagueness of comments is concerning. Many questions remain. o What are the emissions from current and future operations, and do/could they impact adjacent neighbors? o What are the risks? o Have environmental spills occurred in the past? o Has the land and water been tested recently? o What measures are taken and by whom to ensure everyone remains safe? As City Council Members and advocates for all residents of Arden Hills, we respectfully ask that you act on an evaluation of impact regarding the listed concerns for the community of Arden Hills. Per City of Arden Hills Code: 1325.05 Design Standards Subd. 6 Aesthetics. A. Evaluation of Impact. The proposed design, scale, massing, materials, height, and other aspects of the subject matter of any permit requested hereunder shall be evaluated by the Planning Commission and the Council with respect to structures and properties in the surrounding area. To this end, the Planning Commission and the Council shall consider, prior to the issuance of any permit hereunder, whether the appearance of the subject matter is so at variance with the structures and properties in the surrounding area as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values in the surrounding area or to unreasonable detract from the appearance of the area or the city. Boston Scientific was informed of these concerns during the public hearing, indicated it would be resolved, however, they have not been addressed. We are all advocates for adding new jobs and foreseeable expansion of the BSCI campus, however, it needs to proceed responsibly without negatively impacting the residential neighbors or the community. For most in this community, our homes are the single largest investment and this expansion as proposed is a direct threat to our property values and quality of life we have come to enjoy. We encourage all of you to take a walk along the community trail and review the concerns. 4 | Page Arden Hills City Council February 17, 2021 Sincerely, Bryan and Sarah Mills 1280 Wynridge Drive Gregory and Janice Groberg 1270 Wynridge Drive Todd and Nicole Vandeberg 1266 Wynridge Drive Scott and Alisha Hvistendahl 1258 Wynridge Drive Pedro Urriola and Maria Pieters 1250 Wynridge Drive Matthew and Angela Hanggi 1244 Wynridge Drive Bob and Chrissy Christensen 1234 Wynridge Drive Chris and Laura Bale 1263 Wynridge Drive Boston Scientific 4100 Hamline Avenue N Arden Hills, MN 55112 +1 (800) 876-9960 corporate main bostonscientific.com March 12, 2021 The Honorable David Grant Mayor of Arden Hills City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: Boston Scientific, Building 14 Expansion: Response to Neighbor Letter RSP Project No.: 6131.022.11 Dear Mayor Grant: Thank you for allowing Boston Scientific the opportunity to address certain residents’ concerns detailed in a February 17, 2021 letter authored by Mr. Bryan Mills (Arden Hill Residents’ Letter). Boston Scientific is a committed corporate citizen of this community and takes its adjoining neighbors’ concerns seriously. We want to assure the City of Arden Hills, and its residents, that the expansion project will not impact the quality of life enjoyed by its resident, nor cause any environmental impacts to the surrounding habitat. Towards this end, we have addressed each of the resident’s concerns in detail below. Additionally, we intend to continue this important dialogue with the community at the April 7, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. As background, following the December 14, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting, hosted by Boston Scientific, residents set out specific concerns relating to the perceived increase in noise emissions and underdeveloped landscape screening at the facility. Boston Scientific heard each concern and implemented immediate measures to correct current conditions and alter expansion plans to address the remainder of the issues to fulfill our neighbors’ requests. It was our understanding that all the proposed changes, as well as the immediate remedial efforts, fully addressed the residents’ initial concerns. It was not until the February 17, 2021 Arden Hill Residents’ Letter that Boston Scientific was made aware of the perceived environmental concerns related to the expansion project. We have provided a detailed response to each of these concerns below; however, we want to assure you; the City of Arden Hills; and its’ residents that Boston Scientific is committed to achieving environmental excellence which it demonstrates by the superior environmental track record maintained at this facility. Attachment F Mr. David Grant Boston Scientific – Building 14 Expansion Response to Neighbor Letter 12 March 2021 Page 2 of 6 With that said, specific responses to the concerns set forth in the Arden Hill Residents’ Letter are as follows: I. NOISE CONCERNS a. Garbage: Emptying the oversized compactor occurs daily between the hours of 5:20 – 6:00 a.m. on the northwestern most position of the property, a site not currently screened by any physical structure. This is not only unsettling but an unwanted daily alarm for the closest residents. This continues to be out of compliance for the City of Arden Hills Code: 660.04 Collection and Licensing Subd 4. i. Subd. 4. No person, company, or corporation shall collect or remove garbage, refuse, recyclable materials, or other mixed municipal solid waste in any residential district or from any property sharing a property line with a residential district in which the collection can cause a negative impact to the adjacent residential district (i.e., noise, odors), except between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. We brought this to Mike Mrosla’s attention in December 2020 and he stated it would be immediately addressed but even after 60+ days this remains a persistent issue. Response: Boston Scientific was first introduced to this concern during the December 14th Neighborhood Review Meeting. The day following the meeting, our facility staff reached out to all on-site service vendors requesting they abide by city ordinance 660.4, Subd.4 and to stay within the allotted time frames. It was noted by Arden Hills Planning Manager Mike Mrolsa that the very next day Waste Management arrived at the facility at 6:05am. Boston Scientific understands that there have been a few occurrences since the December 14th meeting where refuse collection happened prior to 6:00am. Additional corrective actions are in place with continual monitoring of the area, such as; weekly touchpoints with Waste Management, evaluation of other suppliers, signage at refuse compactor to stipitate allowable collection times, and daily review of security footage to verify compliance. Boston Scientific will continue to take action in order to comply with the city ordinance. b. Commercial HVAC Equipment: Current operations entail the air handling units running 24/7. Varying degrees of noise are emitted from these pieces of equipment and that needs to be studied in their current, future, and max-output operation for noise emission. Adding to the current noise levels will be two and likely three additional pieces of equipment mounted to the roof structure. The increase in noise of these running simultaneously is yet to be understood. The new height would be unobstructed by trees and noise will surely increase the noise level in surrounding neighborhoods. Response: Boston Scientific completed a noise study in January of 2021 which captured ambient noise readings at two un-obstructed locations on the NW property line for a period of 24 hours. Results indicated that noise levels generated by existing HVAC equipment on the roof did not exceed the nighttime L50 levels for residential land use (based on our nearest receiver). The expansion project will not substantially increase noise emissions. The design of the building expansion incorporates a mechanical penthouse that is designed to protect the HVAC Mr. David Grant Boston Scientific – Building 14 Expansion Response to Neighbor Letter 12 March 2021 Page 3 of 6 equipment and provide a noise barrier to the surrounding neighborhood. Boston Scientific has partnered with ESI, a local engineering consultant with expertise in sound engineering, to analyze the impact of proposed state of Building 14. Using the information provided by the equipment manufacturer and the improved design of the roof of building 14, ESI calculated that the future noise impact to residences adjacent to BSC property will be far below the MPCA nighttime L50 limits. c. Argon Gas Storage: Refills occur on a regular basis but are not uncommonly completed prior to 6:00 AM on weekdays. The hissing sound is clearly audible during these events and is also out of compliance of City of Arden Hills Code: 1325.06 Subd. 2. i. Off-Street Loading. Off-street loading space shall be provided in connection with any use which requires the receipt or distribution of materials by truck. Where noise from such loading space is audible in a residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Response: Boston Scientific was introduced to this concern during the December 14th Neighborhood Review Meeting. The following day our facility staff reached out to all on-site service vendors requesting they abide by city ordinance 660.4, Subd.4 and stay within the allotted time frames. We are working with our vendor, Air Products, to devise an alternative plan for completing deliveries at Building 14 between the hours of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm to accommodate residents. d. Previous Noise Studies: Noise studies were conducted by a contracted third party due to a previous Building 14 expansion and the data findings were conclusive; Boston Scientific was NOT in compliance of state noise laws at time of study. Mitigation steps occurred via plantings but some of those plantings have since died and been removed. No additional plantings were completed to replace those trees nor have follow up noise studies been shared with the community. Response: This statement is false. The study the residents are referring to occurred fifteen years ago, on Dec 8, 2006, and although initial noise levels were above MPCA levels Boston Scientific took immediate steps to reduce noise below MPCA levels. Boston Scientific invested in substantial sound abatement techniques including planting trees and the installation of sound absorption measures in certain areas of the facility. In follow-up surveys conducted on April 25, 2007 and June 20, 2007, prepared by independent third-party ESI Engineering Inc., the L50 levels were confirmed to be below MPCA limits for the area. These results were sent to the City of Arden Hills. In 2021, in preparation for the new expansion, another noise study was completed by ESI Engineering Inc. After a thorough review of the current and future operating conditions, ESI Engineering concluded that the noise from Building 14 would not exceed MPCA standards for this region. e. Independently contracted noise studies of a statistically significant data set should be conducted, reviewed, and shared with the community prior to voting on any current or future proposals. The data collection needs to occur where the noise is impacting the adjacent residents (on decks, outside 2nd or 3rd floor bedroom windows or in back yards NOT buried in the woods as proposed along the BSCI property lines). When the study occurs, you will capture the above activities. Time stamped audio recordings have already been captured to validate the concerns. Mr. David Grant Boston Scientific – Building 14 Expansion Response to Neighbor Letter 12 March 2021 Page 4 of 6 Response: Boston Scientific has done multiple noise studies of this area and has shared previous results with the City of Arden Hills. Most recently, on January 21, 2021, Boston Scientific collected ambient noise readings at two un-obstructed locations along the NW property line for a period of 24 hours. The noise levels on the BSC property were well within the MPCA limits. The data conclusively demonstrated that Boston Scientific’s existing operations continue to remain in compliance with current noise emission levels. II. BUILDING HEIGHT/VISUAL POLLUTION a. Building height/visual pollution: Building 14’s existing structure sits at a height of 21 feet. The proposed expansion will almost double in height to a proposed height of 40 feet and sit exposed as a visual monstrosity. It should be noted that a significant number of mature trees were removed from the southwestern portion in the summer of 2019. These stumps can be observed from the community trail and would have considerably obstructed the view of this proposed expansion. A revision to the proposed building height should be made to remain consistent with the existing Building 14 structure; the City of Arden Hills should not grant a variance to the current zoning maximum height restriction of 35 feet. i. City of Arden Hills Code: 1320.06 District Requirements Chart: As described by City of Arden Hills Planning Manager, Mike Mrosla, we see this height variance as a “give and take” option where we will “give” the 40’ variance. We don’t see any way “taking” additional plantings can ever screen or obstruct a 40’ building from the residentially exposed side of the property. Additionally, these plantings will take decades to make any considerable impact on the proposed expansion. Response: As noted by Mr. Mrsola, Boston Scientific was granted an option to exceed the 35’ height restriction pursuant to the Master Planned Unit Development (PUD) negotiated with the City of Arden Hills in 2003. Although the PUD is not a guarantee to exceed the height limit, it allows Boston Scientific to provide justification why the limit should be exceeded under certain conditions. In the case of the Building 14 expansion, the extended height of the building will be used to enclose all HVAC systems that support the manufacturing of the new building, which in turn will aid in improving visual aesthetics and noise mitigation to the surrounding community. In addition, BSC plans to execute an extensive restoration landscaping project which will include planting an extensive array of mature trees and expanding the greenway around the facility. Mr. David Grant Boston Scientific – Building 14 Expansion Response to Neighbor Letter 12 March 2021 Page 5 of 6 III. EXPANDED LITHIUM BATTERY MANUFACTURING a. Expanded Lithium Battery Manufacturing: An environmental and safety specialist was present during the community presentation and spoke vaguely about the current and future impact of BSCI’s battery manufacturing operations. The vagueness of comments is concerning. Many questions remain. i. What are the emissions from current and future operations, and do/could they impact adjacent neighbors? Response: Since 1995, Boston Scientific Arden Hills has been subject to an Option D air permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and completes annual emissions reporting for the site. MPCA and the Department of Health (MDH) partner to establish air pollutant levels that are sustainable to the environment and are acceptable for human health. Our annual Emissions Inventory Report is submitted to the MPCA every year and is available for public review on their website. The Arden Hills site continues to be within compliance limits of our permitted air pollutant thresholds. Any emissions from future campus building expansions will be captured in the reporting process to MPCA and made publicly available. The Arden Hills campus strives to be a center of environmental excellence by continually improving our technologies to achieve the least impact on the surrounding community and environment as we continue to produce life saving devices. ii. What are the risks? Response: None. The processes in the new building 14 expansion will continue to be the same as current operations and thus will not alter the type of emissions emitted from the facility. The proposed area will be folded into our current emissions reporting process and submitted annually to the MPCA. iii. Have environmental spills occurred in the past? Response: No knowledge of spills and/or releases have occurred during Boston Scientifics tenure at the Arden Hills facility. Further, Boston Scientific has no knowledge or evidence of any historical spills and/or releases from Building 14 prior to Boston Scientific purchase of the property in 2004. iv. Has the land and water been tested recently? Response: In 2019, there was a potential release to soil from Building 14 and proper notification was made to the MPCA. In response to a potential release at Building 14, Boston Scientific conducted a round of soil sampling pursuant to guidance by MPCA. The samples confirmed that a release had not occurred at the facility. The MPCA closed their investigation in October 2020. Mr. David Grant Boston Scientific – Building 14 Expansion Response to Neighbor Letter 12 March 2021 Page 6 of 6 Boston Scientific partners with the Rice Creek Watershed District and complies with all stormwater permitting and discharge into the watershed. Each project done on BSC campus requires a review, approval, and permit by RCWS. v. What measures are taken and by whom to ensure everyone remains safe? Response: Boston Scientific Arden Hills is certified under the ISO 14001 program, which illustrates our ardent commitment to act as a responsible environmental steward. In addition, the Arden Hills facility partners with Ramsey County, City of Arden Hills, Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services, the MPCA, the MN Safety Council, MDH, BayWest, local fire and police, on many different topics to ensure employee and community safety and stay up to date on any new and emerging topics. We have a well-educated Facilities and EHS department with a wide variety of experience that manage the ISO 14001 program; maintain permit requirements; and work with local, state and federal environmental and health agencies. The Boston Scientific team takes pride in how we can continue to reduce our environmental footprint while improving safety for our employees and community. We thank you for this opportunity to comment and address residents’ concerns of the Arden Hills expansion project. We hope that this summary provides more insight into the improvements Boston Scientific has invested in over the years to demonstrate our continued commitment to acting as a responsible and committed member of the Arden Hills community. In the event you have further questions or need clarification on certain issues addressed in this letter please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Respectfully, Jeff Hejl Facility Engineer Boston Scientific 4100 Hamline Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 February 5, 2021 Mr. Jeff Hejl Boston Scientific Corporation 14 Innovation Way Arden Hills, Minnesota Subject: Summary Report for Building 14 Expansion – Chiller Noise Control Boston Scientific – Arden Hills, Minnesota Dear Mr. Hejl: This letter is a summary on chiller noise control for the Building 14 Expansion project at Boston Scientific in Arden Hills, Minnesota. Air-cooled chillers will be on the roof of the addition and there are residential neighborhoods to the north and east of the building. Our work involved measuring the existing noise in the area and calculating future noise from the proposed chillers. The noise was compared to the State of Minnesota MPCA noise requirements. Figure 1 shows a layout of the site with the new addition on the south side of Building 14. Figure 1 – BSC site showing the Building 14 addition and measurement locations. $WWDFKPHQW* Mr. Jeff Hejl February 5, 2021 Boston Scientific Corporation Page 2 The City of Arden Hills ordinances reference the State of Minnesota noise requirements. Minnesota Rule 7030: Noise Pollution, prepared by the MPCA, has requirements for maximum allowable sound levels by receiving land use evaluated at the point of the nearest receiver. Table 1 shows the Rule 7030 L101 and L502 noise limits per noise area classification (NAC). NAC 1 is residential and recreational land use, NAC 2 is commercial, and NAC 3 is industrial. Table 1 – MPCA Code Requirements Boston Scientific is zoned as Industrial, but the nearest receiving property lines are Residential. Therefore, the requirements for noise are an L50 of 60 dBA and an L10 of 65 dBA during the daytime and an L50 of 50 dBA and an L10 of 55 dBA during the nighttime. All the requirements are to be evaluated over 1-hour periods and apply to the location of the nearest receiver, which is at the residences, not on the BSC property. Since the chiller equipment will operate continuously during the day and night, the lower nighttime requirement of 50 dBA at the residential property line will be used as the design goal for chiller noise mitigation. To determine the existing noise in the area around Building 14, 24-hour long noise measurements were made at locations A and B shown in Figure 1. The measurements results are in Attachment A. Table 2 summarizes the measurement results. There was a lot of traffic noise from Hwy 694 at the site and it was difficult to separate the existing BSC noise from the traffic sources. From the data, we estimate the BSC noise contribution is below 49 dBA, therefore we will combine that level with the new noise from the chillers to evaluate mitigation design in comparison with the 50 dBA design goal. Table 2 – Summary of Noise Measurement Results 1 L10 is the sound level that is exceeded 10% of the time during a measurement period. 2 L50 is the sound level that is exceeded 50% of the time during a measurement period. L10 L50 L10 L50 1 Residential 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 50 dBA 2 Commercial 70 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 3 Industrial 80 dBA 75 dBA 80 dBA 75 dBA Noise Area Classification Receiver Type Daytime (7AM - 10PM)Nighttime (10PM - 7AM) Metric A B Notes L90 49 dBA 45 dBA for 24 hour period L50 49 dBA 45 dBA lowest hourly level L10 51 dBA 47 dBA lowest hourly level Location Mr. Jeff Hejl February 5, 2021 Boston Scientific Corporation Page 3 Chiller noise at a radius of 300’ from chillers, which is within the BSC property line boundaries. The 300’ radius is shown in Figure 1. There will be three chillers on the roof of the addition, although only two will operate simultaneously. Further, we have been told that the two chillers will only operate at 75% of full load capacity simultaneously. The manufacturer’s sound data at 75% of full load was used in the calculations. We propose to use a barrier wall to mitigate the chiller noise. Figure 2 shows an elevation sketch of the building addition and site that was used for calculations to determine the barrier wall design and predict chiller noise. Sample calculations are in Attachment B. Figure 2 – Sketch showing the chillers and barrier wall arrangement used to evaluate noise for the Building 14 addition. For a 13’ high barrier, the noise level at 300’ from the building was calculated to be 41.6 dBA. The total noise was 49.7 dBA when combined with the ambient noise level of 48.9 dBA. Raising the wall an additional 6’ to match the penthouse roof elevation reduce chiller noise to 36.8 dBA, however when combined with the ambient noise of 48.9 dBA, the total noise was only reduced 0.5 dB to 49.2 dBA. It may not be good value to raise the barrier wall above 13’. The objective of our engineering work was to determine mitigation necessary to control chiller noise at the residential property lines. We determined a barrier wall height that will attenuate chiller noise to a level that meets the MPCA requirements when combined with the other BSC noise in the environment. The calculation results show that the wall should be at least13’ high. We will work with RSP to evaluate the final wall details. Mr. Jeff Hejl February 5, 2021 Boston Scientific Corporation Page 4 I appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and remain available to assist in the resolution of these and any other matters. Please let me know if you have any questions or need more information. Sincerely, Anthony J. Baxter, P.E. Principal ESI Engineering, Inc. Attachments File: P2704 Boston Scientific - Summary Report, Chiller Noise Control, Feb 5, 2021 ver 1 .docx 03.15.2021 | BUILDING 14 EXPANSIONCITY COUNCIL WORKING SESSION1 Attachment H Nicole LancasterEnvironmental Health Specialist03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 2 CUMMINGSPARKBUILDING 14PROPOSED ADDITIONITEM 1: NOISE STUDY DATA COLLECTION LOCATIONSHAMLINE AVELEXINGTON AVECO RD FCUMMINGS PARK DRIVEWALKING TRAIL03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 3 EXIST BLDG 14 PROPOSED ADDITIONPROOFOFPARKINGMECH PENTHOUSEMECHEQUIPSITE PLANNORTHEXISTINGEMERGAENCYGENERATOREXISTINGELECTRICALTRANSFORMERNEWELECTRICALTRANSFORMERPARKINGWETLANDEXISTINGLOADINGDOCKINNOVATION WAYWETLANDMAINENTRYEXISTINGPARKINGWALKINGTRAILEXISTING MECHEQUIPSIZE100' x 160'17,000 SF - First Floor8,000 SF - Mechanical Penthouse14,500 SF - Manufacturing2,500 SF - Office / LobbyHEIGHT21' to Low Roof Parapet40' to Penthouse ParapetMATERIALSAluminum Panels - (to match campus)Architectural PrecastGlass - (to match campus)Metal Louvers - (to match campus)ITEM 1: -REFUSE COLLECTION-GAS REFILLSITEM 1: EXISTING HVAC EQUIPMENT IN THIS LOCATION WILL BE ABLE TO BE REMOVED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXPANSION.ITEM 2: BSC WILL PROVIDE TREES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF EXISTING BLDG 14 AND THE EXPANSION TO REGENERATE AND IMPROVE VISUAL SCREENING OVER TIME.ITEM 2: THE ENCLOSED PENTHOUSE SERVES TO MITIGATE NOISE FROM MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. THE HEIGHT OF THE VISUAL/ACOUSTICAL SCREEN WALL FOR EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON THE ROOF HAS BEEN INCREASED PER THE CURRENT NOISE STUDY. THE STUDY INDICATES NOISE LEVELS RELATED TO NEW ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT TO BE WITHIN MPCA REQUIREMENTS. THE MEASUREMENT POINTS ARE SHOWN ON PLAN.ITEM 3: -EMISSIONS -SOIL TESTING-RISKS -SAFETY MEASURE-SPILLS03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 4 PROOF OF PARKINGBIO-FILTRATION BASINEXISTINGEMERGAENCYGENERATOREXISTINGELECTRICALTRANSFORMERNEWELECTRICALTRANSFORMERPROPOSED ADDITION EXIST BLDG 14NOTE: BSC HAS A SEPERATE EFFORT WITH XCEL ENERGY THAT WILL PROCEED PRIOR TO APPROVALS OF THE BLDG 14 EXPANSION PROJECT. THIS EFFORT IS AN OPERATIONAL NEED TO PROVIDE A REDUNDANT POWER FEED TO EXISTING BLDG 14. REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE FEEDER PATH TO HELP PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING OF BUILDING OVER TIME.03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 5 4321123403.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 6 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 7 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 8 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 9 ITEM 1: HEIGHT OF SCREEN WALL INCREASED TO MITIGATE NOISE.03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 10 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 11 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 12 03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 13 THANK YOU!QUESTIONS?03.15.2021 | BLDG 14 - EXPANSIONBOSTON SCIENTIFIC | RSP ARCHITECTS | 14 Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 2021 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Corrin Bemis, Consultant Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-002 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Bethel University Property Location: 3900 Bethel Drive Request: Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review Requested Action Bethel University (“The Applicant”) he applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment and Site Plan Review for a proposed project at 3900 Bethel Drive (“Subject Property”) to update the existing football and practice fields located in the southern quadrant of the Bethel University Campus. Specific improvements include converting the football field to artificial turf with a new running track constructed around it. The proposed project will also include sports field lighting, scoreboards, spectator plazas, and perimeter fencing, as well as updates to the existing grandstand and press box. Seating capacity will remain as is. Background 1. Overview of Request Bethel University is proposing to update the existing football and practice fields located in the southern quadrant of their main campus at 3900 Bethel Drive. The Applicant is proposing to convert the existing grass football field into a synthetic turf stadium field with a new track constructed around it and the existing grass practice field into a synthetic turf multi-purpose field. The Applicant is also proposing changes to the lighting around the two fields, the spectator plazas, the perimeter fencing, and the grandstand and press box. Bethel University operates under a CUP Master Plan. As the university comes forward with plans, they are reviewed against the Master Plan for consistency. Building plans that are consistent with the Master Plan require a Site Plan Review. A CUP Amendment is required when plans are not included in the approved Master Plan. The two proposed improvements to the football field and the practice field are not included on the Master Plan and a CUP Amendment is therefore required. Page 2 of 7 2. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: Public and Institutional Existing Land Use: Public and Institutional Zoning: INST – Institutional District Size: 191.32 Acres (Including main campus, athletic complex, and part of Lake Valentine) Topography: Varied topography across campus Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart 1. District Provisions (INST Institutional District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the Bethel University campus is guided as Public & Institutional on the land use plan. The main Bethel University campus is located in the Institutional Zoning District. Higher education campus uses, including but not limited to classrooms and laboratories, are allowed conditional uses in this district. The proposed changes to the football and practice fields that the Applicants propose to add are complementary to the use of the Subject Property as an educational institution. A. Building and Landscaping Coverage – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requirements for the INST District allow a maximum building footprint of 35% and a minimum landscape area of 26%. Landscaping is defined as all plantings, including trees, grass, and shrubs. The table below identifies the proposed percentages. The proposed additions would not result in additional structure coverage on the Subject Property. The approved CUP for the campus limits the total lot coverage of impervious surfaces to 25% and requires a minimum landscape lot area of 75%. As proposed, the new additions would not exceed the lot coverage requirements for the campus. B. Height – Meets Requirements The maximum height in the INST District is 35 feet. Bethel University is not proposing to build any new buildings with their football field improvements project. Bethel University will stay in compliance with district height requirements. C. Setbacks – Meets Requirements Setbacks in the INST District are 50 feet in the front yard, 20 feet in the rear yard, and 10 feet in the side yard. Structures must be located a minimum of 100 feet from abutting residential property. There are currently no structures within 100 feet of abutting residential properties. The Applicant is not proposing any structures within the 100 feet setback. The proposed practice field would be setback 12 feet from the side yard property line. Page 3 of 7 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.05 A. Lighting – Additional Information Requested The Applicant is proposing the addition of stadium lighting around the football field and track, along the bleachers, and around the practice field. Section 1325.05 Subd. 3 requires lighting in all districts to direct light away from adjoining lots and public streets. Direct or sky-reflected glare, from floodlights or high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, shall not be directed at any adjoining lots or public streets. All lighting proposed by the Applicant will face downward onto the fields. Section 1325.05 Subd. 3 also requires the source of illuminate to be hooded, concealed or controlled in a manner so as to direct the lighting pattern only on the site to which the lighting is intended. The Applicant is proposing lighting fixtures that are shielded on all four sides to direct the lighting down towards the fields. For information about the Applicant’s lighting plan can be found in Attachment E. Any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential property. The maximum illumination at the property line is 1.28 foot candles. All illumination readings over 0.4 foot candles are located at least 200 feet from the nearest residential property. Given the downward facing direction of the stadium lighting and the fields’ distance from any residential properties, staff do not anticipate any issues with regard to lighting. However, as a condition of approval staff recommends the Applicant be required to provide photometric calculations for the lighting at the property lines of all adjacent residential properties. B. Screening and Fencing – Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise, glare, activity, or dust. The football and practice field update will be screened using a mix of landscaping and fencing. The proposed project includes upgrades to the fencing around the football and practice Page 4 of 7 fields. Fencing is proposed on the northeast side of the football field, south of the Discus-Hammer Throw Event and Shot Put facilities, and along the west side of the football field. C. Tree Preservation – Additional Information Requested A Tree Preservation Plan is required as part of an application when City grading permit or erosion control permit is required. The Tree Protection Plan submitted by the Applicant shows that 34 significant trees are set for removal. The Ordinance allows 10% to be removed without replacement. The remaining caliper inches to be removed must be replaced at a ratio of 1 caliper inch for each 2 inches removed. The proposed landscaping plan identifies a total of 78 caliper inches of replacement trees, all three (3) caliper inch Heritage Oak trees. As a condition of approval, staff recommends requiring the Applicant to provide updated information about the size and type of trees being removed. Staff also recommends a landscaping letter of credit or escrow be required. D. Parking, Traffic, and Circulation – Meets Requirements The proposed additions are not anticipated to generate additional parking demand on the campus because the seating capacity will remain as is. Users of the proposed football and practice fields will continue to use either the Heritage Parking Lot, located north of the fields, or the SoHo Parking Lot, located east of the fields. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications Section 1355.04, Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; 6. Park dedications where applicable; and the 7. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. In the granting of a conditional use permit, the City Council may impose such conditions, in addition to the general conditions and requirements of this Code to which every conditional use permit shall be subject, as it deems necessary to serve and protect the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the community. Such conditions may include, among other things, a time limit within which the conditional use or a portion thereof, or improvements in connection therewith are to be established, constructed, completed or commenced, and a requirement that the person or firm to whom the conditional use permit has been granted deposit with the City either cash or a performance bond in a sum equal to one Page 5 of 7 hundred twenty five (125%) percent of the estimated cost, as determined by the City Engineer, of improvements to be constructed in accordance with the permit to insure completion thereof within the time limit specified in the permit. The conditions so imposed by the City Council shall be specifically stated in the permit and maybe subject to periodic review as determined by the City Council. The violation of any special or general condition set forth in a conditional use permit shall constitute a violation of this Code. Additional Review Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment F) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. The Bethel University main campus at 3900 Bethel Drive is located in the Institutional Zoning District. 2. A Higher Education, College Campus is a Conditional Use in the Institutional District. 3. Bethel University operates under a Conditional Use Permit Master Plan. 4. The proposed additions are not included on the Master Plan and a CUP Amendment is required. 5. Bethel University has requested Site Plan Review approval for the proposed changes to the football and practice fields. 6. The proposed changes to the football and practice fields would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning Code. 7. A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 8. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 7, 2021. Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Findings: 9. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions because the additions do not include an increase in football field seating. 10. The proposed plan includes the addition of LED lights and will increase illumination around the football fields. 11. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 12. The proposed plan will impact drainage on the site. 13. The proposed plan will not impact population density. 14. The proposed plan is not expected to have a visual impact on surrounding properties or on land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land or adjoining land Page 6 of 7 values because the new additions will not be easily visible from outside the Bethel University campus. 15. Park dedication requirements are not applicable. 16. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 002 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the April 7, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: a. All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit shall remain in full force and effect. b. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the March 11, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. c. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. d. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. e. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. f. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. g. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. h. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. i. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide updated information about the size and type of trees being removed. j. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a landscaping letter of credit or escrow shall be required. k. The Applicant shall be required to provide photometric calculations for the lighting at the property lines of all adjacent residential properties. Page 7 of 7 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 002 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the April 7, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-002 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-002 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice and Comments The Applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting via Zoom on February 9, 2021. The Applicant did not receive community pushback at this meeting. Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out on Friday, March 26, 2021. Staff has not received any public comments regarding this application as of April 1, 2021. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 24, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by May 23, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Bethel University – Athletics Complex – Concept 1 D. Submittal Documents E. Lighting Plan F. Engineering Comment Letter Attachment A Location Map Legend Municipal Boundary City Mask March 31, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink 1 in = 752 ft ± $WWDFKPHQW% Attachment C ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel Dr, St Paul, MN 55112TITLE SHEETJRPDCR0V1123087VICINITY MAPDRAWING INDEXGENERAL NOTES1. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.3. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN UNTIL ALL PERMITS ARE OBTAINED AND SUBMITTED TO, AND ACCEPTED BY, THE CITY.4. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN UNTIL TRAFFIC PLANS ARE SUBMITTED , REVIEWED, OR APPROVED BY THE CITY.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT ACOPY OF ALL PERMITS TO OWNER, ENGINEER, AND THE CITY.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS. ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.7. INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATURE OF MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.8. INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.10. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.11. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECTDRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.12. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.13. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TOREMAIN.15. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 28.1 OR 28 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 928.1 OR 928.17. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE TURF FINISH GRADES, TOP OF CURB, OR FINISH GRADE OF ASPHALT AND CONCRETE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FORAMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL ANDEXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BEINCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT.19. NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 3' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (3:1), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.20. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE SYNTHETIC TURF SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALLBE SEEDED OR SODDED.21. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED ORRE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.22. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES ANDELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.23. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES 4715.0700 AND 4715.0750, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORMSEWER STRUCTURES.b. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:b.a. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”b.b. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS” OR APPROVED EQUAL.22. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MN RULES 4715.1710, SUBPART 3. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTEREDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).23. CONTACT THE BUILDING ENGINEER 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ONSITE TO COORDINATE TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STAFFPARKING AND THE RELOCATION OF EXISTING DUMPSTERS.24. CONTACT THE UNIVERSITY IRRIGATION FOREMAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ONSITE TO FLAG OR MARK AND TO COORDINATETEMPORARY RELOCATION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM.25. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTEMUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED.BETHEL SHEET LISTC1.0 TITLE SHEETC1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLANC1.11 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN - THROWSC1.2 SITE GEOMETRIC PLANC1.21 SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN - ALTERNATE 1C1.22 SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN - THROWSC1.3 SITE FINISHING PLANC1.31 SITE FINISHING PLAN - ALTERNATE 1C1.32 SITE FINISHING PLAN - THROWSC1.4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC1.41 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - ALTERNATE 1C1.42 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - THROWSC1.5 UTILITY PLANC1.51 UTILITY PLAN - ALTERNATE 1C1.6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANC1.61 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - THROWSL1.0 LANDSCAPE PLANL1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN - THROWSC2.1 DETAILSC2.2 DETAILSC2.3 DETAILSC2.4 DETAILSE0.0 ELECTRICAL TITLE SHEET AND SYMBOL INDEXE1.0 ATHLETIC FIELD ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLANE2.1 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING PLANE2.2 ATHLETIC FIELD POWER AND SYSTEMS PLANE3.0 PRESS BOX PLANE4.0 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES AND RISER DIAGRAME5.0 ELECTRICAL DETAILSE6.0 STADIUM SOUND SYSTEM DETAILSBethel UniversityELECTRIC CONTACTFIRM: HALLBERG ENGINEERINGADDRESS: 1750 COMMERCE COURT,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN, 55110CONTACT: JOE VOMELA (MAIN - 651.748.1100)(DIRECT - 651.748.4376) Attachment D REMOVESCOREBOARDINCLUDINGFOOTINGSDISASSEMBLE BLEACHERS(DELIVER TO OWNER, CONFIRM NEW LOCATION)PROTECT HOMEBLEACHERSPROTECTPRESS BOXREMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREFER TO ELECTRICALPLANS FOR TREATMENTREFER TO ELECTRICALPLANS FOR TREATMENTREFER TO ELECTRICALPLANS FOR TREATMENTPROTECT POWER POLESREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEREMOVETREES, INCLUDINGSTUMPSPROTECTTREE(ALT 1)PROTECTTREE(ALT 1)REFER TO ELECTRICALPLANS FOR TREATMENTREMOVEGOAL POSTREMOVESIGNREMOVE STORMSEWER LINEREMOVE EXISTING6' CHAIN LINK FENCEINCLUDING FOOTINGSPROTECT CONCRETEPAVEMENTPROTECT BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTPROTECT STADIUMENTRANCESAWCUTSAWCUTSAWCUTSAWCUTREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCE(ALT 1)REMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCE(ALT 1)REMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEINCLUDINGFOOTINGSREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEREMOVETREESAND SHRUBSREMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEPROTECTUTILITY SHEDREMOVECONCRETE(FIELD VERIFYLOCATION)RECONSTRUCTDIRT/GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)SEE SHEET C1.3 FOR PROPOSED LAYOUTAND SHEET C1.4 FOR GRADING.RECONSTRUCTDIRT/GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD AS NECESSARY.(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)SEE SHEET C1.3 FOR PROPOSED LAYOUTAND SHEET C1.4 FOR GRADING.REMOVETREES ANDSHRUBSREMOVE EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBSREMOVE EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBS(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)TREEREMOVALS(ALT 1)REMOVEBLEACHER RAMP AND STAIRSINCLUDING SLABS AND FOOTINGSTREEREMOVALS(ALT 1)PROTECTTREE, TYP.PROTECTTREE, TYP.PROTECTTREE, TYP.PROTECTTREE, TYP.PROTECTTREES(FIELD VERIFYLOCATION)REMOVEGOALPOSTINCLUDINGFOOTINGSREMOVESIGNINCLUDINGFOOTINGSREMOVESTORMWATERPROTECTPONDPROTECT POWER POLES(PROVIDE TRENCH BOX TOPROTECT FROM UTILITY EXCAVATION)PROTECT POWER POLESREMOVE STADIUM FIELD SOILS, DRAIN TILE, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMPROTECT STORMSEWERSTRUCTUREPROTECT STORMSEWERSTRUCTUREPROTECTCREEKSAWCUTSAWCUTREMOVECONCRETESLAB ANDFOOTINGS BASEDON ARCHIVEINFORMATION,FOOTINGS AREAPPROXIMATELY6' DIA X 10' DEEP.REMOVE6' CHAIN LINK FENCEPROTECT BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTPROTECTGATEPROTECTFENCEPROTECTFENCEPROTECTTREES, TYP.PROTECTBRICK WALL ANDLANDSCAPINGPROTECT CONCRETESTEPS, TYP.REMOVE VEGETATIONAS NEEDED FOR1" WATER LINE(REFER TO SHEET C1.5)PROTECT WOOD WALLPROTECTBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVETREES, INCLUDINGSTUMPSALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1 LI MI T SALT 1: REMOVEPRACTICE FIELDSOILS, DRAINTILE,AND IRRIGATIONSYSTEMPROTECT WATERLINEREMOVEDRAINAGE GUTTERS(FIELD VERIFY)REMOVE(FIELD VERIFY)REMOVEDRAINAGE GUTTERS(FIELD VERIFY)ALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1 LI MI T S REMOVE EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBS(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)REMOVE EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBS AS NEEDED FORSTORM WATER LINES(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)RNOTES:LEGENDCONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALSFENCING REMOVALSUTILITY REMOVALSTREE REMOVALSSAWCUTORANGE SNOW PROTECTIVE FENCINGPROPERTY LINEBASE BID REMOVAL LIMITS1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES(CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING,ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS ANDVEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TO OWNER'SSATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.4. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEENDETERMINED OR ANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ANDTHE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITECHARACTERISTICS.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TO LOCATEALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.6. TREE PROTECTION: INSTALL ORANGE SNOW FENCING AT DRIP LINE.EXISTING CONDITIONSAND REMOVALS PLANATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/20210V1123087DCRJRPFEETSCALE03060HORZ. RELOCATE MOVABLE PLASTIC BROOMBALLBARRIERS TO TEMPORARY LOCATIONDURING CONSTRUCTION (COORDINATE W/OWNER)PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBSPROTECT EXISTINGPARKING LOTPROTECTEXISTINGVEGETATIONPROTECTEXISTINGVEGETATIONPROTECT EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBSPROTECT EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBSPROTECT EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBSPROTECT EXISTINGTREES AND SHRUBSPROTECT EXISTING TREERNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITEFEATURES (CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING, ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASSAND VEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TOOWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.4. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THEFIELD. EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICHCOULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED OR ANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE,THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TOEXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE CHARACTERISTICS.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TOLOCATE ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BYCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.6. TREE PROTECTION: INSTALL ORANGE SNOW FENCING AT DRIP LINE.EXISTING CONDITIONSAND REMOVALS PLANTHROWSATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/20210V1123087DCRJRPLEGENDCONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALSPROPERTY LINEFEETSCALE03060HORZ. MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMPRAD PT. 'B'RAD PT. 'A'90°0'0"'90°0'0"'283.88' BETWEEN RADII233.03' T O P A V E M E NT / C U R B F A C E TRAC K R A DI U S E X T E N D E DTRACK R A DI U S E XT E N D E DTRACK RADIUS EXTENDEDR118.50' TO MEASURE LINER152.32' TO FENCE LINER150.02' TO RESILIENT SURFACE(HIGH POINT OF TRACK PAVE)R116.02' TO FACE OF CURBR152.93' TO 4' FENCER150.63' TO RESILIENT SURFACE(HIGH POINT OF TRACK PAVEMENT)R164.93' TO FENCEPCPC35.30'PCPC184.02'80.00'36.00' 35.30'36.00'110.00'R118.50' TO MEASURE LINE8.00'147.64(45m)147.64(45m)8.00'32.8027.60'R20.00'R40.00'R33.0'R19.0'R16.0'R48.0'R36.0'R221.00'R40.00'R30.00'145°51'44"26.36'42.70'15.50'11.00'18.84'14.20'R15.40'30.81' (M.E.WIDTH)24.89'19.50'51.23'47.15'R55.00'R55.00'R116.52' TO FACE OF CURB46°4'40"R50.00'R58.00'R429.68'R42.00'R74.31'R163.32'R417.68'32.00'12.00'12.00'R20.00'R10.00'R189.17'21.50'16.50'5.00'R8.00'12.00' 18.84' M.E. WI D T H 12.00'22.23'7.97'17.34'12.00' M.E. WIDTH18.64' TOBACK OF CURB35.30'47.66'R167.41' TO TRENCH DRAIN8.00'(M.E. WIDTH)12.00'R163.32'8.00'(M.E. WIDTH)R3.00'R50.00'R3.00'1.76'1.76'28°12'9"6.00'20.00'3.89'126.91'JRPDCR0V1.123087SITEGEOMETRICPLAN(BASE BID)ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.RLEGENDBASELINE FOR DIMENSIONSPOINT OF CURVATUREPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED TREE LINEPCNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT,CENTERLINE OF FENCE, OR PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT. MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMPRAD PT. 'B'RAD PT. 'A'90°0'0"'90°0'0"'283.88' BETWEEN RADII233.03' T O P A V E M E NT / C U R B F A C E TRAC K R A DI U S E X T E N D E DTRACK R A DI U S E XT E N D E DTRACK RADIUS EXTENDEDR118.50' TO MEASURE LINER152.32' TO FENCE LINER150.02' TO RESILIENT SURFACER116.02' TO FACE OF CURBR152.93' TO 4' FENCER150.63' TO RESILIENT SURFACER164.93' TO FENCEPCPC35.30'PCPC184.02' 230.0 0' ( A L T 1)365.00' (ALT 1)80.00'36.00' 35.30'36.00'110.00'R118.50' TO MEASURE LINE126.28' (ALT 1)8.00'147.64(45m)147.64(45m)8.00'32.8027.60'R20.00'R40.00'R33.0'R19.0'R16.0'R48.0'R36.0'R221.00'R40.00'R30.00'R830.56' (ALT 1)R830.56' (ALT 1)145°51'44"26.36'42.70'15.50'11.00'18.84'14.20'135°0'0" (ALT 1)R8.00' (ALT 1)135°0'0" (ALT 1)R8.00' (ALT 1)8.00'R169.41' TO TRENCH DRAINR15.40'30.81' (M.E.WIDTH)24.89'19.50'51.23'47.15'R55.00'R55.00'R116.52' TO FACE OF CURB46°4'40"R50.00'R58.00'R429.68'R421.68'R42.00'R50.00'R74.31'R163.32'R417.68'32.00'25.00' ( A L T 1) 12.00'12.00'R20.00'R10.00'R189.17'21.50'16.50'5.00'R8.00'12.00' 18.84' M.E. WI D T H 12.00'22.23'7.97'17.34'3.89'12.00' M.E. WIDTH18.64' TOBACK OF CURB35.30'47.66'JRPDCR0V1.123087SITEGEOMETRICPLAN(ALTERNATE 1)ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.RLEGENDBASELINE FOR DIMENSIONSPOINT OF CURVATUREPROPERTY LINEPCNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT,CENTERLINE OF FENCE, OR PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT. MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)19-LANE RUNNING TRACK234567891234567891234567894 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 403020104030201050STADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMPRAD PT. 'B'RAD PT. 'A'13C2.313C2.3CONSTRUCTCOMM BOX @TRACK FINISHLINEBOX CCONSTRUCTCOMM BOX @50-YARD LINE2C2.31C2.39C2.21C2.31C2.31C2.31C2.31C2.38C2.38C2.31C2.416C2.319C2.319C2.36C2.36C2.34'CLF4'CLF4'CLF6'CLF4'CLF4'H10'W4'H10'W4'H5'W4'H5'W4'CLF4'CLF4'CLF4'H12'W4'H10'W6'CLF6'CLF6'H16'W6'H16'W4'CLF6'CLF3C2.36C2.43C2.36C2.412C2.318C2.316C2.34C2.33C2.33C2.31AC2.3BOX EBOX FBOX HBOX I7C2.37C2.37C2.37C2.37C2.3AAAABOX B7C2.36'H16'W6'H12'W6'CLF6'H8'W3C2.4NEW DIRT ACCESS DRIVERELOCATED DIRT ACCESS DRIVE20C2.3FUTURE PLAZA(APPROXIMATE EXTENTS)20C2.37C2.34C2.4BOX A7C2.3AAAA6'CLFBURY & CAPCONDUIT LINE FORFUTURE CONNECTIONA4'H16'RBOX DBOX G3C2.37C2.316C2.34C2.34C2.318C2.33C2.43C2.4LEGENDFENCING KEY NOTES4' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL5' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE10' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE12' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE8' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE12' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE16' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE16' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SLIDING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICENOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT..3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECIEVE SYNTHETICTURF SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED.4. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TOALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGESWILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING ANDNEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.5. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TOPROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR ALLAPPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THESATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.INSTALL TWO - 2" AND ONE - 1" CONDUIT BLANKS WITH90-DEGREE SWEEPS (WITH PULL TAPE AND TRACE WIRE) AT30" DEPTH FOR FUTURE NEEDS. EXTEND TO EACH COMMBOX SHOWN (9). CAP AND LABEL ALL CONDUIT RUNS.KEY NOTESAJRPDCR0V1123087SITE FINISHINGPLAN(BASE BID)ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.4'H5'W4'CLF4'H10'W4'H12'W6'H12'W6'CLF6'H16'W6'H8'WREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED SYNTHETIC TURFPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITH RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITHOUT RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED RECLAIMED GRAVEL DRIVEPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)FENCING KEY NOTEPROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCINGPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH MAINTENANCESTRIP1C2.36'CLF4'H16'R MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)19-LANE RUNNING TRACK234567891234567891234567894 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 403020104030201050STADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMPRAD PT. 'B'RAD PT. 'A'13C2.313C2.3CONSTRUCTCOMM BOX @TRACK FINISHLINEBOX CCONSTRUCTCOMM BOX @50-YARD LINE2C2.31C2.39C2.21C2.31C2.31C2.31C2.31C2.38C2.38C2.31C2.416C2.38C2.219C2.319C2.36C2.36C2.34'CLF4'CLF4'CLF6'CLF6'CLF6'CLF4'CLF4'H10'W4'H10'W4'H5'W4'H5'W4'CLF4'CLF4'CLF4'H12'W4'H10'W6'CLF6'CLF6'H16'W6'H16'W4'CLF6'CLF3C2.36C2.43C2.36C2.412C2.318C2.316C2.34C2.33C2.33C2.31AC2.3BOX EBOX FBOX HBOX I7C2.37C2.37C2.37C2.37C2.3AAAABOX B7C2.36'H16'W6'H12'W6'CLF6'H8'W3C2.4NEW DIRT ACCESS DRIVERELOCATED DIRT ACCESS DRIVEA20C2.36X14" CURBVALLEY GUTTERBOX LBOX JBOX K6X14" CURBFUTURE PLAZA(APPROXIMATE EXTENTS)20C2.37C2.34C2.4BOX A7C2.3AAAAAAMULTI-PURPOSESCOREBOARD6'CLFBURY & CAPCONDUIT LINE FORFUTURE CONNECTIONA4'H16'RBOX DBOX G7C2.37C2.37C2.33C2.37C2.316C2.34C2.34C2.318C2.33C2.43C2.4LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED SYNTHETIC TURFPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITH RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITHOUT RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED RECLAIMED GRAVEL DRIVEPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)FENCING KEY NOTEPROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCINGPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH MAINTENANCESTRIPFENCING KEY NOTES4' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL5' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE10' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE12' WIDE, 4' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE8' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE12' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICE16' WIDE, 6' HIGH SINGLE SWING GATE WITH LOCKING DEVICENOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT..3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECIEVE SYNTHETICTURF SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED.4. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TOALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGESWILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING ANDNEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.5. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TOPROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR ALLAPPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THESATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.INSTALL TWO - 2" AND ONE - 1" CONDUIT BLANKS WITH90-DEGREE SWEEPS (WITH PULL TAPE AND TRACE WIRE) AT30" DEPTH FOR FUTURE NEEDS. EXTEND TO EACH COMMBOX SHOWN (9). CAP AND LABEL ALL CONDUIT RUNS.KEY NOTESA1C2.3JRPDCR0V1123087SITE FINISHINGPLAN(ALTERNATE 1)ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.6'CLF4'H5'W4'CLF4'H10'W4'H12'W6'H12'W6'CLF6'H16'R6'H8'W JAVELINDISCUS-HAMMERTHROW EVENTEXISTINGBROOMBALLAREASHOTPUT (2)21C2.314C2.317C2.3GRASSJRPDCR0V1123087SITE FINISHINGPLANTHROWSATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED SYNTHETIC TURFPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITH RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED TRACK AND EVENT PAVEMENTWITHOUT RESILIENT SURFACINGPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED RECLAIMED GRAVEL DRIVEPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)FENCING KEY NOTEPROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCINGPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH MAINTENANCESTRIPNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT..3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECIEVE SYNTHETICTURF SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED.4. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TOALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGESWILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING ANDNEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.5. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TOPROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR ALLAPPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THESATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.1C2.36'CLF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>llllllllllllllllllll l l l>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMP0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 4.5% SLOP E 1.0% MAX.SLOPE1.0% SLOP E 1.0% SLOP E 1.0%SLOPE1.0%SLOPE28.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.228.128.128.1528.128.128.128.128.128.128.128.127.827.828.127.827.892892892828.126.727.827.827.827.827.828.1T.W. (928.2)B.W. (923.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (922.2)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (920.7)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)28.128.1T.W. (928.0)B.W. (922.0)28.128.027.9027.9528.8028.7528.3528.028.0T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)26.427.95928M.E.20.6M.E.20.520.590828.7525.728.0910 912 914 916 91892092892892625.025.2M.E.21.0M.E.21.092027.927.9592792692427.827.8924922 92693093293492727.892692892792828.1592727.692292091827.927.8928926922919EOF920.120.421.020.420.420.4916924920920919T.W. (928.0)B.W. (924.2)924T.W. (926.0)B.W. (924.0)31.031.427.7527.8M.E. 29.492221.591691992828.327.85THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF25.619.019.028.128.128.1T.S. 27.9B.S. 25.9 (M.E)T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.326.026.028.027.9528.028.1528.428.328.628.128.3528.4528.2528.628.5528.128.1M.E.28.127.992892828.028.528.3528.128.0928T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)T.W. (927.9)B.W. (925.9)M.E.26.826.726.428.0M.E.(25.5)M.E.(25.7)THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF28.0528.1527.8527.9527.992827.828.027.9928928 92827.925.7525.026.819.827.828.128.027.627.827.828.128.0T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.3T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.328.028.027.7528.027.8528.027.8528.028.127.9527.9527.9527.8528.027.9528.0EOF927.5EOF920.193019.019.0FILTRATIONAREA 2AFILTRATIONAREA 4AFILTRATIONAREA 1C928927928RLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGTW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLBW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLT.S. = TOP OF STEPB.S. = BOTTOM OF STEPPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATIONPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPERTY LINEGRADING AND DRAINAGEPLAN(BASE BID)1C2.1928.0928928.5ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.0V1123087DCRJRP1. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTIONSTAKING / LAYOUT.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS,INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL PERMITS TO THECITY.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE(CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALLSIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCALAUTHORITIES.5. INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.6. INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATUREOF MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.7. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.8. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.9. REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, PART OFSECTION 01 89 13, FOR EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 31 00 00 SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.10. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTIONCAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROMSEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.11. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.12. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITEFEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.14. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.15. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 28.5 OR 28 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TOMEAN 928.5 OR 928.16. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN INDICATE TOP OF CURB, PAVEMENT SURFACE, OR GUTTERGRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT,FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONEIN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORTSUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BEINCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT.18. NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 3' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (3:1), UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE SYNTHETIC TURF,SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED.20. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.21. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.22. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCEFOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANYWATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BEMEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).23. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFOREBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL NOTES928 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>llllllllllllllllllll l l l>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMP28.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.228.128.128.1528.128.128.128.128.128.128.128.127.827.828.127.827.892892892828.126.727.827.826.792627.827.827.827.828.1T.W. (928.2)B.W. (923.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (922.2)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (920.7)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)28.128.1T.W. (928.0)B.W. (922.0)28.128.027.9027.9528.8028.7528.3528.028.0T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)927927.527.228.827.2928 92726.427.9592827.8M.E.20.6M.E.20.520.590828.7525.728.0910 912 914 916 91892092892892625.025.2M.E.21.0M.E.21.092027.926.727.627.959279269240.5% SLOP E0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 27.827.8924922 92693093293426.026.393093292427.226.792692727.89264.5% SLOP E 92892792828.1592727.692292091827.827.927.227.627.727.8928926922919EOF920.120.421.020.420.420.4916924920920919T.W. (928.0)B.W. (924.2)924T.W. (926.0)B.W. (924.0)31.031.427.7527.8M.E. 29.492221.591691992828.327.85THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF25.619.019.028.128.128.1T.S. 27.9B.S. 25.9 (M.E)T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.326.026.01.0% MAX.SLOPE28.027.9528.028.1528.428.328.628.128.3528.4528.2528.628.5528.128.1M.E.28.127.992892828.028.528.3528.128.09281.0% SLOP E 1.0% SLOP E T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)T.W. (927.9)B.W. (925.9)1.0%SLOPE1.0%SLOPEM.E.26.826.726.428.0M.E.27.0M.E.(25.5)M.E.(25.7)THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF927 28.0528.1527.8527.9527.992827.828.027.9928928 92827.925.7525.026.819.827.828.128.027.8527.827.828.128.0T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.3T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.328.028.027.7528.027.8528.027.8528.028.127.9527.9527.9527.8528.027.9528.0EOF927.5EOF920.128.128.020.520.5RLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGTW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLBW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATIONPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPERTY LINEGRADING AND DRAINAGEPLAN(ALTERNATE 1)1C2.1928.0928928.5ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.0V1123087DCRJRP1. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTIONSTAKING / LAYOUT.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS,INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL PERMITS TO THECITY.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE(CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALLSIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCALAUTHORITIES.5. INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.6. INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATUREOF MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.7. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.8. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.9. REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, PART OFSECTION 01 89 13, FOR EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 31 00 00 SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.10. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTIONCAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROMSEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.11. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.12. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITEFEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.14. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.15. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 28.5 OR 28 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TOMEAN 928.5 OR 928.16. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN INDICATE TOP OF CURB, PAVEMENT SURFACE, OR GUTTERGRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT,FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONEIN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORTSUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BEINCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT.18. NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 3' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (3:1), UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE SYNTHETIC TURF,SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED.20. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.21. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.22. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCEFOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANYWATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BEMEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).23. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFOREBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL NOTES928 JAVELINDISCUS-HAMMERTHROW EVENTEXISTINGBROOMBALLAREASHOTPUT (2)89.189.588989.589.5M.E.90.388989.7589.989.689.9890889M.E. 89.0(FIELDVERIFY)89.4M.E.90.088.888.9RGRADING AND DRAINAGEPLANTHROWSATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021FEETSCALE03060HORZ.LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATIONPROPERTY LINE1C2.2928.0928928928.50V1123087DCRJRP1. SEE SHEET C1.4 FOR GENERAL NOTESNOTES MULTI-PURPOSYNTHETIC FI(ALTERNATE BID - RSHEET C1.X>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>FLAT TILE CONNECTIONTO 15" PERF PVC (TYP)FLAT TILE CONNECTIONTO 15" PERF PVC (TYP)FLAT TILE CONNECTIONTO 12" PERF PVC (TYP)FLAT TILE CONNECTIONTO 12" PERF PVC (TYP)20.00' (TYP)20.00' (TYPICAL)1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE7C2.2(TYPICAL)7C2.2(TYPICAL)7C2.2(TYPICAL)7C2.2(TYPICAL)1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILE1"X12"FLAT TILESLOPE = 0.34%SLOPE = 0.44%SLOPE = 0.62%SLOPE = 0.71%SLOPE = 0.27%SLOPE = 0.34%SLOPE = 0.50%SLOPE = 0.55%>>MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMP28.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.3528.228.128.128.1528.128.128.128.128.128.128.128.127.827.828.127.827.892892892828.126.727.827.827.827.827.828.1T.W. (928.2)B.W. (923.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (922.2)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (920.7)T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)28.128.1T.W. (928.0)B.W. (922.0)28.128.027.9027.9528.8028.7528.3528.028.0T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)T.W. (928.2)B.W. (928.2)26.427.95928M.E.20.6M.E.20.520.590828.7525.728.0910 912 914 916 91892092892892625.025.2M.E.21.0M.E.21.092027.927.9592792692427.827.8924922 92693093293492727.892692892792828.1592727.692292091827.927.8928926922919EOF920.120.421.020.420.420.4916924920920919T.W. (928.0)B.W. (924.2)924T.W. (926.0)B.W. (924.0)31.031.427.7527.8M.E. 29.492221.591691992828.327.85THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF25.619.019.028.128.128.1T.S. 27.9B.S. 25.9 (M.E)T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.326.026.028.027.9528.028.1528.428.328.628.128.3528.4528.2528.628.5528.128.1M.E.28.127.992892828.028.528.3528.128.0928T.W. (928.0)B.W. (921.0)T.W. (927.9)B.W. (925.9)M.E.26.826.726.428.0M.E.(25.5)M.E.(25.7)THICKENED POROUSAGGREGATE SECTION. 7"DEPTH X 19,000 SF28.0528.1527.8527.9527.992827.828.027.9928928 92827.925.7525.026.819.827.828.128.027.627.827.828.128.0T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.3T.S. 29.3B.S. 28.328.028.027.7528.027.8528.027.8528.028.127.9527.9527.9527.8528.027.9528.0EOF927.5EOF920.193019.019.0FILTRATIONAREA 2AFILTRATIONAREA 4AFILTRATIONAREA 1C928927928>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>211' - 12" PERFPVC @ 0.44%MH 104RIM = 927.6INV. = 919.57 SW/SEINV. = 923.07 N48" IDR-1642 CASTING TO RECEIVE2-1/2" SYNTHETIC TURFMH 105RIM = 927.6INV. = 921.03 NE/SEINV. = 923.33 NW/SW48" IDR-1642 CASTING TORECEIVE 2-1/2"SYNTHETIC TURF15" PERF PIPE INV. =921.75. CAP 2 ENDS OFPERFORATED PVC.660' - 15" PERFPVC @ 0.33%442 - 15" PERFPVC @ 0.33%INV. 6" DT = 924.55INV. = 923.88WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 923.17WYE CONNECTION152' - 12" PERFPVC @ 0.44%218' - 15" PERFPVC @ 0.33%>>>>TD-CB9TD-CB8TD-CB7TD-CB6TD-CB5TD-CB4TD-CB3TD-CB2TD-CB159' - 15" PVC@ 0.33%>>UGS 1BSTONE INV. = 915.8836" PIPE INV. = 916.38PIPE OUT INV. = 916.38WATER QUALITY ELEV (OCS 1) = 918.38HWL = 919.17SURFACE AREA OF STONE (MIN) = 8,103 SFVOLUME OF STONE (MIN) = 5,991 CFNUMBER OF 36" PIPES = 88>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>FILTRATION AREA 1CBOTTOM ELEVATION = 926.00BOTTOM AREA = 4,382 SFHWL = 926.82EOF = 927.10WATER QUALITY ELEV = 926.80FILTRATION AREA 2ABOTTOM ELEVATION = 919.00BOTTOM AREA = 3,122 SFHWL = 919.89EOF = 920.10WATER QUALITY ELEV = 919.80FILTRATION AREA 4ABOTTOM ELEVATION = 919.00BOTTOM AREA = 2029 SFHWL = 920.02EOF = 920.10WATER QUALITY ELEV = 919.80CB 1RIM = 926.8INV. = 918.94 W/NINV. = 921.80 DT48" IDR-2560EA (BEEHIVE)297' - 15" RCP@ 0.52%MH 101RIM = 925.0INV. = 915.90 WINV. = 917.40 E48" IDR-1642FES 1INV. = 905.0015" APRONWITH RIP RAP21' - 15" RCP@ 0.33%> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CB 2RIM = 919.8INV. = 914.10INV. = 915.00 DT48" IDR-2560EA (BEEHIVE)MH 106RIM = 920.8INV. = 910.20 (EXISTING - FIELDVERIFY)INV. = 913.70 W48" IDR-1642CONSTRUCT STRUCTURE OVEREXISTING PIPE. PROVIDE FLEXIBLEJOINT AT PIPE CONNECTIONS.71' - 12" PVC@ 0.56%CB 4ARIM = 927.7INV. = 919.30 NINV. = 922.97 EINV. = 925.30 FD (2)12" PVC STRUCTURE WITHAN 8" LD STANDARD GRATESB 1INV. = 919.0012" APRONWITH RIP RAP36' - 12" RCP@ 0.83%60' - 8" PVC@ 0.80%CB 4CRIM = 927.8INV. = 923.90INV. = 925.30 FD (2)8" PVC STRUCTURELD STANDARD GRATECB 3RIM = 919.8INV. = 913.20INV. = 915.00 DT48" IDR-2560EA (BEEHIVE)FES 3INV. = 913.0012" APRONWITH RIP RAP27' - 12" RCP@ 0.74%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CB 5ERIM = 927.8INV. = 923.6 NE/SINV. = 925.30 FD (1)12" PVC STRUCTUREWITH AN 8" LDSTANDARD GRATE65' - 8" PVC@ 0.92%CB 5BRIM = 927.9INV. = 923.30INV. = 925.4 FD (2)8" PVC STRUCTURELD STANDARD GRATE>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>INV. 6" DT = 924.55> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CB 5DRIM = 927.9INV. = 924.00INV. = 925.40 FD (2)8" PVC STRUCTURELD STANDARD GRATEINV. = 924.00.CAP END OF 12"PERFORATED PVCINV. = 923.70WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 923.35WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 924.00.CAP END OF 12"PERFORATED PVC.WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 923.80WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 923.44WYE CONNECTION6"DT6"DT6"DT6"DT6"DT6"DT6"DT6"DT>>>>>>MH 103RIM = 928.0INV. = 918.16 SINV. = 919.38 NW/N//E60" IDR-16428' - 15" PVC@ 0.33%INV. = 918.13>>>>>>>>69' - 15" RCP@ 0.33%MH 102RIM = 928.1INV. = 919.1548" IDR-164264' - 15" RCP@ 0.33%>>FES 2INV. = 905.0015" APRONWITH RIP RAP18' - 15" RCP@ 0.33%8' - 24" RCP@ 0.00%OCS 1RIM = 925.8CONNECT DT ON DOWNSTREAMSIDE OF WEIR WALLINV. = 916.38>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>INV. (3) =913.8840.00'40.00'40.00'40.10'INV. =913.70PROTECT EXISTING UTILITYPOLE. CONTRACTOR TODESIGN AND PROVIDESHORING.PROTECT EXISTING UTILITYPOLE. CONTRACTOR TODESIGN AND PROVIDESHORING.INV. = 922.75INV. = 922.75>>>>>>>>>>INV. = 915.75INV. = 915.75INV. = 915.75INV. = 915.75INV. = 915.75>>>>>>>>>>PROPOSED YARD HYDRANT WITH 1"COPPER SERVICE. REFER TOSPECIFICATIONS. CONNECT 4" PVCDRAIN TO CB 4E @ INV. = 924.901" WS1" WSCONNECT TO EXISTING 2"COPPER WATER SERVICEINV. = 920.20185' - 12" PVC@ 0.44%>>>>>>CB 5FRIM = 927.8INV. = 924.10INV. = 925.30 FD (2)8" PVC STRUCTURELD STANDARD GRATECB 4BRIM = 927.9INV. = 923.40INV. = 925.40 FD (1)12" PVC STRUCTURE WITHAN 8" LD STANDARD GRATE53' - 8" PVC@ 0.94%55' - 8" PVC@ 0.91%53' - 8" PVC@ 0.80%CONNECT TO 2" OUTLET WITHA 2" PVC ON EXTERIOR WALLOF STEEPLE CHASE. OUTLETINVERT FROM STEEPLE CHASEIS APPROXIMATELY 926.30.CONNECT 2" PVCFROM STEEPLECHASE TO 15" PERFPVC @ INV = 921.2516C2.117C2.116C2.117C2.116C2.117C2.111C2.212C2.211C2.212C2.211C2.212C2.211C2.211C2.211C2.211C2.211C2.218C2.119C2.112C2.112C2.112C2.112C2.112C2.112C2.14C2.24C2.24C2.21C2.213C2.2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>13C2.113C2.113C2.113C2.113C2.113C2.113C2.18C2.19C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.114C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.115C2.110C2.210C2.210C2.210C2.210C2.212C2.110C2.210C2.21C2.2CB 5CRIM = 927.9INV. = 923.80INV. = 925.40 FD (2)12" PVC STRUCTURE WITHAN 8" LD STANDARD GRATECB 5ARIM = 927.9INV. = 919.00 NWINV. = 923.00 SW/NEINV. = 925.40 FD (2)12" PVC STRUCTURE WITHAN 8" LD STANDARD GRATE36' - 8" PVC@ 0.83%23' - 8" PVC@ 0.87%CENTER LINEOF FIELDWORK SHOWN ON THEINSIDE OF THIS DASHEDLINE (MULTIPURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD) IS BYALTERNATE #1WORK SHOWN ON THEINSIDE OF THIS DASHEDLINE (MULTIPURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD) IS BYALTERNATE #145.50'40.00'160.00'61.00'23.00'27.50'12C2.2START TDEND TDSTART TDEND TDEND TDSTART TDSLOPE = 0.34%SLOPE = 0.44%SLOPE = 0.62%SLOPE = 0.71%SLOPE = 0.27%SLOPE = 0.34%SLOPE = 0.50%SLOPE = 0.55%INV. = 922.20>> >>12C2.112C2.1INV. = 915.75INSTALL CLEANOUTADJACENT TO BUT NOT INTHE BITUMINOUS WALKllllllllllllllllllll l l l1" RISER WITH BLINDFLANGE8C2.11" RISER WITH BLINDFLANGEWS PIPE FROM HERE TO THECURB STOP NEAR THE YARDHYDRANT MAY BE INSTALLEDAT 2'-3' BURY DEPTHMH 107BRIM = 924.0INV. = 916.00 NWINV. = 918.80 SE48" IDR-1642>>>>13C2.1>>>>>>>>>>>>13C2.138' - 12" PVC@ 0.53%45' - 12" RCP@ 0.44%CB (EXISTING)RIM = 903.8INV. = 900.80 (EXISTING -FIELD VERIFY)CONNECT TO EXISTINGSTRUCTURE. PROVIDEFLEXIBLE JOINT AT PIPECONNECTIONS.MH 108RIM = 918.9INV. = 905.07 WINV. = 915.70 E48" IDR-1642PROTECT EXISTING KEYSTONEWALL, STAIRS, ETC.CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN ANDPROVIDE SHORING.46' - 15" RCP@ 0.43%MH 109RIM = 918.2INV. = 905.06 WINV. = 913.40 E48" IDR-164251' - 15" RCP@ 0.39%1" WS1" WS1" WS1" WS >>>>>>13C2.1CB 4DRIM = 927.9INV. = 924.208" PVC STRUCTURELD STANDARD GRATE>>>>>>>>>>>>35' - 8" PVC@ 0.86%60' - 8" PVC@ 0.83%CB 4ERIM = 927.9INV. = 924.70INV. = 924.90 (YARD HYDRANT DRAIN)8" PVC STRUCTURE LD STANDARDGRATESB 2INV. = 919.0012" APRONWITH RIP RAP18C2.119C2.129' - 12" RCP@ 0.69%CB 6ARIM = 927.8INV. = 919.20 EINV. = 924.00 N12" PVC STRUCTURE WITHAN 8" LD STANDARD GRATECB 6BRIM = 927.9INV. = 924.508" PVC STRUCTURE LDSTANDARD GRATE58' - 8" PVC@ 0.86%24' - 12" RCP@ 0.83%MH 107ARIM = 916.0INV. = 901.00 NWINV. = 915.80 SE48" IDR-1642ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021UTILITY PLANFEETSCALE03060HORZ.1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE COPPER TYPE K CONFORMING TO ASTM B 88-62. ALLWATER SERVICE PIPING SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).3. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTSIN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALLPIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.b. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:i. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.7. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANYMANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIALSOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCESHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).8. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATIONDISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).9. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFGATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONSSHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURBAND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.NOTESLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGEOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOWT.W. = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLB.W. = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLT.S. = FINISH GRADE AT TOP OF STEPB.S. = FINISH GRADE AT BOTTOM OF STEPPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATIONPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED PERFORATED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER SERVICEPROPOSED DRAINTILE (DT) / FINGER DRAIN (FD)PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPOSED CURB BOXPROPOSED YARD HYDRANTPROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE UNITSPROPERTY LINE1C2.1955>>l>>>>>>DARBJD0V1123087>>92828.013C2.11C2.28C2.29C2.210C2.113C2.211C2.118C2.119C2.116C2.117C2.18C2.19C2.11C2.210C2.211C2.2 MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SLOPE = 0.55%>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>12" PERFORATEDPVC (2) INV = 924.7028.3528.128.127.826.727.827.826.792627.8927927.527.228.827.292892727.826.727.627.959279260.5% SLOP E 0.5% SLOP E 26.026.393093292427.226.792692727.827.927.227.627.727.892892626.026.01.0% SLOP E M.E.26.826.726.4M.E.27.092726.88.127.9527.95EOF927.5587' - 12" PERFPVC @ 0.44%587' - 12" PERFPVC @ 0.44%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>INV. 6" DT= 925.00INV. 6" DT= 925.00MH 201 (ALTERNATE #1)RIM = 927.2INV. = 916.60 NEINV. = 922.12 S/SW48" IDR-1642>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >INV. = 924.26WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 924.44WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 924.57WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 924.40WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 922.48WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 922.30WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 922.26WYE CONNECTIONINV. = 922.44WYE CONNECTION6" DT @ 1.20%6" DT @ 1.27%6" DT @ 1.25%6" DT @ 1.18%6" DT @ 0.47%6" DT @ 0.37%6" DT @ 0.27%6" DT @ 0.35%8C2.28C2.28C2.28C2.28C2.28C2.28C2.28C2.2FES 4 (ALTERNATE #1)INV = 916.412" APRON WITH RIP RAP16C2.117C2.146' - 12" PERFPVC @ 0.44%40.00'40.00' 80.00'40.00'30.00'ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021UTILITY PLAN - ALTERNATE 1FEETSCALE02040HORZ.1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE COPPER TYPE K CONFORMING TO ASTM B 88-62. ALLWATER SERVICE PIPING SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).3. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTSIN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALLPIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.b. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:i. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.7. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANYMANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIALSOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCESHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).8. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATIONDISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).9. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFGATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONSSHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURBAND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.NOTESLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGEOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOWT.W. = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLB.W. = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLT.S. = FINISH GRADE AT TOP OF STEPB.S. = FINISH GRADE AT BOTTOM OF STEPPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATIONPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED PERFORATED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER SERVICEPROPOSED DRAINTILE (DT) / FINGER DRAIN (FD)PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPOSED CURB BOXPROPOSED YARD HYDRANTPROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE UNITSPROPERTY LINE1C2.1955>>l>>>>>>DARBJD0V1123087>>92828.013C2.11C2.28C2.29C2.210C2.113C2.211C2.118C2.119C2.116C2.117C2.18C2.19C2.11C2.210C2.211C2.2 MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)9-LANE RUNNING TRACKSTADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMP1C2.12C2.11C2.11C2.1[][]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AAAAAAA[][][] [] [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][ ] [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]AA1C2.11C2.11C2.1A3C2.13C2.13C2.13C2.13C2.13C2.13C2.13C2.14C2.14C2.14C2.14C2.15C2.15C2.1AAAALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1 LI MI T SALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1 LI MI T S AAAAREROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROLPLAN1. REFER TO SHEET C1.3, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 01 89 13) FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING ANDEROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.3. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSEDDIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATIONAS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.4. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.5. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCALREGULATIONS.6. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT INDOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OUTDOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED RESTORATION.7. INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWERSTRUCTURES, PROVIDE A PRODUCT FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST. APPROVED PRODUCTS:a. ROAD DRAIN "TOP SLAB", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCOb. ROAD DRAIN "CURB & GUTTER", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCOc. INFRASAFE "SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER", MANUFACTURED BY ROYALENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.d. INFRASAFE "DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE", MANUFACTURED BY ROYALENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.e. INFRASAFE "CULVERT INLET PROTECTOR", MANUFACTURED BY ROYALENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.f. DANDY SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC.g. DANDY CURB SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC.h. OR APPROVED EQUAL.8. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DELINEATE TURF AND VEGETATED AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBEDWITH ORANGE SNOW FENCE. NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS SHALLBE PERMITTED TO UTILIZE, ACCESS, OR OTHERWISE ENTER THE AREAS DESIGNATED NOT TOBE DISTURBED. MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND DISRUPTION OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS OUTSIDETHE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO COMPLY WITH MN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERALPERMIT.NOTESSILT FENCE = 800 L.F.SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG = 1,000 L.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE = 25 C.Y.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET = 3,000 S.Y.INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLET = 16APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROLDEVICE QUANTITIESLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGEOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOWTW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLBW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPOSED SURGE BASINPROPOSED SILT FENCEPROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGPROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKETPROPOSED TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERMINLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETPROPOSED TREE LINEPROPERTY LINE1C2.192828.6>>A[]ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021JRPDCR0V112308792810C2.113C2.211C2.116C2.117C2.118C2.119C2.11C2.13C2.12C2.14C2.15C2.1FEETSCALE03060HORZ. JAVELINDISCUS-HAMMERTHROW EVENTEXISTINGBROOMBALLAREASHOTPUT (2)1C2.12C2.1REROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROLPLAN - THROWS025 501. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 01 89 13) FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.3. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS.PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.4. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.5. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCAL REGULATIONS.6. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT IN DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT, THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OUT DOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATEDRESTORATION.7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DELINEATE TURF AND VEGETATED AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITH ORANGE SNOW FENCE. NOCONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO UTILIZE, ACCESS, OR OTHERWISE ENTER THE AREASDESIGNATED NOT TO BE DISTURBED. MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND DISRUPTION OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS TO COMPLY WITH MN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT.NOTESSILT FENCE = 400 L.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE = 25 C.Y.APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICEQUANTITIESLEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGEOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOWTW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALLBW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALLPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED SILT FENCEPROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKETPROPERTY LINE1C2.189089.688989.6ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021JRPDCR0V1123087EXCERPT FROM THE SWPPP NARRATIVESECTION 1.1 SWPPP Construction Sequence1.1 SWPPP Construction Sequence1. Install perimeter silt fence where indicated on the Drawings. Silt fence shall be as specified in Section 31 25 00.2. Prior to construction, delineate turf and vegetated areas not to be disturbed with orange snow fence. No construction traffic,equipment or materials shall be permitted to utilize, access, or otherwise enter the areas designated not to be disturbed. Minimize soilcompaction and disruption of topsoil in areas outside the construction limits to comply with MN Construction Stormwater GeneralPermit.3. Locally strip topsoil and push topsoil into minimum 2 foot-high temporary berms at perimeter silt fence locations for redundanterosion protection. Where possible, leave an undisturbed vegetation strip between the temporary topsoil berm and the silt fence. Siltfence shall be located downslope from the temporary berm.a. Provide temporary seed and mulch on temporary berms as described herein.a. 4. Have silt fence, sediment logs, and other erosion control devices inspected by local authorities, as required by the localauthority.5. Construct the rock construction entrance.6. Begin mass grading of the site, recognizing the following sequence:a. In fill areas, strip and stockpile soils prior to placement of subsequent fill.i. Provide temporary seed and mulch on stockpiles as described herein.ii. Provide silt fence at the base of stockpiles, full perimeter. This silt fence is not shown on the plans but shall be included in theContractor's lump sum bid.b. In cut areas, strip and stockpile soils prior to placement of subsequent fill.i. Provide temporary seed and mulch on stockpiles as described herein.ii. Provide silt fence at the base of stockpiles, full perimeter. This silt fence is not shown on the plans but shall be included in theContractor's lump sum bid.7. Establish subgrade elevations for synthetic turf field, running track and field events and other paved areas.8. Simultaneously with mass grading work, begin installation of utilities.a. Construct proposed storm sewer system.i. Construct Sediment Control Devices at proposed storm sewer inlets (hay bales around castings and silt fence under castings willnot be acceptable).ii. Begin construction of the underground retention system.(1) Protect the underground retention system during construction.(2) Construct the temporary berm around the excavation to prevent construction site sediment from reaching theunderground retention system. The temporary berm can be a simple wind row of soil pushed into a berm from theadjacent area.(3) Do not allow sediment to reach the underground system. Maintenance of Sediment Control Devices is critical until theupslope areas are stabilized.(4) Once backfilling the underground retention system is complete, remove the temporary berm.b. Construct proposed water service.9. Construct retaining walls.10. Construct bleacher footings and foundations, including backfill.11. Begin placement of sand sub-base in track and field events and synthetic turf field areas.a. Install collector drain tile system and complete sand subbase installation.12. Install fabric and porous rock base material over turf field.13. Construct turf curb around perimeter of running track; construct trench drain between high jump and running track, between steeplechase runway and running track, and adjacent to fence near east of long-triple jump/ pole vault area.14. Complete stabilization of the outlying vegetated areas (note, establishment of permanent vegetation will be accomplished by theOwner).a. Prior to spreading topsoil, till all subgrade soils that will receive topsoil to a minimum depth of 12 inches as specified in Section31 00 00 Earthwork.b. Spread topsoil and finish grade the outlying areas.c. Prepare these areas for final seeding (by Owner).d. Provide final seed and erosion control blanket (where indicated on the drawings) or seed and mulch where erosion blanket is notindicated (by Owner). This will serve as permanent stabilization for the outlying vegetated areas.15. Continue construction of the track and field event areas and trails using the following sequence:a. Construct the first lift of pavement in the track and field event areas and trails. This will serve as permanent stabilization for theareas.b. Sod the areas surrounding the track and field event areas and trails.c. At this time, these areas will be completely stabilized with the first lift of pavement and the sod installed.16. Construct the Filtration Areas.a. The basin relies on infiltration through the soil media to properly function. Therefore, it is critical to maintain or enhance theinfiltrating properties of the soils within the area. Options to accomplish include the following:i. Limit construction traffic within the area as much as possible to avoid compacting the soils in the area.ii. Use a toothed bucket backhoe to excavate soils. Use off road trucks to haul and dump soils to other parts of the site.iii. Use a bucket and backhoe to place soils (where fill is required).iv. Use a toothed bucket for rough grading.v. Use manual labor for finish grading.vi. Do not use equipment on the surface of the area as this will compact the soils. Minimize smearing of the soils with mechanicalequipment.vii. No stockpiling of soils or other materials shall occur within the area.i. b. Rough grade the Filtration area to specified tolerances and in accordance with the procedures listed in Section 31 00 00Earthwork.i. Access the area at a single location to minimize disturbance to the surrounding areas.ii. Use of self propelled equipment shall be limited within the Filtration Area. Self propelled equipment will compact the soils andadversely affect infiltration. As much as possible, access work in the Filtration area from the edges, outside of the Filtration arealimits.iii. Use a backhoe with long reach ability for final excavation that reaches from outside the area.iv. Remove all debris by hand.v. Scarify the existing underlying soils as specified in Section 31 00 00 Earthwork.c. Provide final grading and final restoration at the Filtration Area, including:i. Access the areas at a single location to minimize disturbance to the surrounding areas.ii. Use of self propelled equipment shall be as described above. Do not use skid steer equipment within the area.iii. Final grade by hand.iv. Provide Mineral Sod within the Filtration Area limits. Sod the surrounding areas by hand.v. Establish vegetation by watering with a temporary irrigation system. Refer to Section 31 00 00 Earthwork for additionalinformation.17. Provide final lift of pavement.18. Construct site fencing.19. Complete stabilization of the outlying vegetated areas (note, establishment of permanent vegetation will be accomplished by theOwner).a. Prior to spreading topsoil, till all subgrade soils that will receive topsoil to a minimum depth of 12 inches as specified in Section31 00 00 Earthwork.b. Spread topsoil and finish grade the outlying areas.c. Prepare these areas for final seeding (by Owner).d. Provide final seed and erosion control blanket (where indicated on the drawings) or seed and mulch where erosion blanket is notindicated (by Owner). This will serve as permanent stabilization for the outlying vegetated areas.20. Install landscaping and plantings.21. Install resilient surface over running track and field events.22. Provide final stabilization and cleanup of the site.Provide maintenance to erosion control devices and BMP's to comply with the requirements of the permit.Re-install all sediment control practices that have been adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activates, such as passage ofconstruction vehicles or equipment, immediately after the short-term activity has been completed. All sediment control practices shall bere-installed before the next precipitation event if the short-term activity is not complete.1.5 Erosion Control Device InspectionProvide maintenance to erosion control devices and BMP's to comply with the requirements of the permit.Re-install all sediment control practices that have been adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activates, such as passage ofconstruction vehicles or equipment, immediately after the short-term activity has been completed. All sediment control practices shall bere-installed before the next precipitation event if the short-term activity is not complete.Inspect erosion control devices and provide routine maintenance as follows:1. Inspect erosion control a minimum of once per week and after each rain event measuring 0.5" or more. Provide a rain gauge at thesite and use the rain gauge to document rainfall events. Record inspection on log posted in Contractor's construction trailer or othersuitable temporary storage area.a. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include:i. Date and time of inspectionsii. Name of person conducting inspectioniii. Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions(1) Findings shall include photographs, accurate description of the observations (i.e., color, odor, settled or suspendedsolids, oil sheen, or other pollutants), and a map describing the locations of the observationsiv. Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activitiesv. Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than one quarter inch (0.25 inch) in 24 hoursvi. Documentation of changes made to the SWPPP as required by the NPDES General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity(MN R100001)b. Inspections are not required where the ground is frozen. The required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24hours after runoff occurs at the site or 24 hours prior to resuming construction, whichever comes first.c. Inspections of areas with permanent cover may be reduced to once per month, even if construction activity continues on otherportions of the site. Once all construction activity is complete, monthly inspections may be terminated after one year followingcompletion of all construction activities.2. Provide maintenance for all devices as follows:a. Silt fences, sediment logs, and erosion control devices at storm sewer inlets shall be inspected for depth of sediment, tears, to seeif fabric is securely attached to support posts or structure, and to see that posts and devices are securely in place.b. Silt fences, sediment logs and erosion control devices at storm sewer inlets, and other erosion control devices shall be cleanedwhen sediment reaches 1/3 the height of the erosion control device, within 24 hours.c. Rock construction entrances shall be inspected for clogging of river rock. River rock that has become clogged with sedimentshall be removed and replaced with fresh river rock.a. d. Repairs or replacements to all erosion control devices shall occur within 24 hours of discovery.e. Temporary diversion berms shall be inspected and any breaches promptly repaired.f. Tracked sediment from construction vehicles on to public streets and paved areas (including paved areas on the construction site)shall be removed within 24 hours of discovery.g. Removal of sediment and restabilization of Surface Waters shall be accomplished within 7 days of discovery (note: surfacewaters include curb and gutter, pavements, storm sewer, swales, or other similar storm water conveyance devices).h. Inlet protection may be removed if a local unit of government directs the permittee to do so because of a specific safety concern.3. Street sweeping (with a pickup broom only) will be provided as needed or at the direction of the Owner / Engineer.1.6 Temporary Soil StockpilesTemporary soil stockpiles shall not be placed in surface waters of the state, including surface conveyances such as curb and gutter, swales,or ditches.Temporary soil stockpiles shall be seeded with temporary seed mix and hydromulch when stockpiles are left inactive for seven (7) days.Note, this does not apply to aggregate stockpiles or other stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (clean aggregatestockpiles, clean rock, clean sand and similar clean aggregates).Provide silt fence at the base of all stockpiles, including clean aggregate and similar stockpiles, full perimeter.Denuded AreasStabilize denuded areas, initiated immediately, within 7 days of last construction activity (temporary or permanent) in that area except fortemporary soil stockpiles.Temporary soil stockpiles shall be treated with appropriate erosion control measure, including silt fence and temporary seeding whenstockpiles are left inactive for periods longer than 7 days.1.7 Steep Slope DisturbancesSteep slopes, defined as slopes steeper than three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, are not proposed for this project. Therefore, nospecial provisions are required.1.8 Dewatering PracticesProvide dewatering of excavations as identified in Section 31 00 00.1.9 Substantial Completion / Turf Establishment1. Provide maintenance of all seeded areas until fully established (by Owner).2. Provide cleaning of storm sewer system at the completion of the project.a. Cleaning shall include removal of accumulated sediment from all surface waters as defined by the permit (for example, curb andgutter, pavements, swales, and storm sewer piping and structures).3. Remove silt fence and erosion control devices at storm sewer inlets following full establishment of site vegetation. Dispose materialsproperly off-site.4. Apply for Notice of Termination (NOT) with MPCA. NOT must be submitted within 30 days after:a. Site has undergone Final Stabilization (at least 80% vegetative cover), andb. Removal of all temporary erosion control measures (silt fence, etc.), andc. Final cleanout and maintenance of all permanent storm water facilities, anda. d. Completion of all maintenance activities and site cleanup.2.1 Temporary Stabilization1. Stockpiles and disturbed portions of the site where construction activity temporarily ceases for the time frames noted above shall bestabilized with a temporary seed and mulch according to the following:a. All areas of bare soil exposed to possible erosion shall be shaped to drain with minimum potential for erosion. The disturbedareas shall then be seeded with perennial ryegrass and annual wheat at a rate of 10 pounds per acre (0.25 lbs./1,000 sq. ft.) and 20pounds per acre (0.50 lbs./1,000 sq. ft.) respectively, then and covered with hydromulch (Mn/DOT 3884, Type 5 consisting ofwood cellulose fiber pulp) at a rate of 1,500 pounds per acre (note, where erosion control blanket is proposed, hydromulch is notrequired).b. Stabilize areas to be paved by placing Class V aggregate base course.2. Permanent Stabilization:a. Permanent stabilization shall occur in accordance with Specification Sections 32 12 16, 32 16 13, 32 16 23, 32 92 19, 32 92 23,and 32 93 00 and as shown on the Construction Drawings. MULTI-PURPOSESYNTHETIC FIELD(ALTERNATE BID - REFER TOSHEET C1.X1)19-LANE RUNNING TRACK234567891234567891234567894 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 403020104030201050STADIUMFIELDSTEEPLECHASE PITHIGHJUMP10 - QGMINERAL SODMINERAL SODMINERAL SOD5 - QG6 - QGBASE BIDBASE BIDALTERNATE 1ALTERNATE 1ALTERNATE 15 - QGALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1 LI MI T SALTERNATE 1 LIMITSALTE R N A T E 1SEEDDISTURBEDAREA AS PARTOF BASE BIDRLANDSCAPE PLANNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS.3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORECONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SODDING AND SEEDING.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.7. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, REFER TO SPECIFICATION FORPROCEDURE.8. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.9. ALL TREES SHALL RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, UNLESSOTHERWISE SPECIFIED.10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO. 1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BEMATCHED. ALL OVERSTORY TREES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'.LEGENDPROPOSED MINERAL SODPROPOSED SEED MIX #1PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPERTY LINEATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021DECIDUOUS TREESCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYQG QUERCUS X MACDANIELII `CLEMONS` TM HERITAGE OAK 3" CAL. B&B 26PLANT_SCHEDULEJRPDCR0V11230871'-0"MIN1'-0"MIN2.5 X BALL DIA. MIN.DECIDUOUS TREESET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR ATFINISH GRADE - ADJUST TREE ASREQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLARSTANDS LEVEL TO OR SLIGHTLYABOVE FINISHED GRADESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(4" MIN DEPTH)PLANTING SOIL (MIN. DIMENSIONSHOWN)SOIL SAUCER: USED PREPAREDSOIL (4" MIN.)ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BECUT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALSHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED.PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORMPEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING.FEETSCALE03060HORZ. JAVELINDISCUS-HAMMERTHROW EVENTEXISTINGBROOMBALLAREASHOTPUT (2)RLANDSCAPE PLANTHROWSNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.4, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SHEET L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN, FOR PLANT SCHEDULE.3. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS.4. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORECONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SODDING AND SEEDING.5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECIEVE TURF ORAGLIME SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.7. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, REFER TO SPECIFICATION FORPROCEDURE.8. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.9. ALL TREES SHALL RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, UNLESSOTHERWISE SPECIFIED.10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO. 1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BEMATCHED. ALL OVERSTORY TREES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'.LEGENDPROPOSED SEED MIX #1PROPERTY LINEATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/20210V1.123087DCRJRPFEETSCALE03060HORZ. ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEEXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN2" TO 3" WASHED ROCKNOTE: PROVIDE WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFICENTERS OR EXITS THE CONSTRUCTION SITE6" MINIMUM THICKNESSCATCH BASINVARIES61"RIM ELEVATION"PRECAST COVER -8" THICKSTEPS - INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAM SIDE@ 16" O.C.RUBBER GASKET -TYP AT ALL JOINTSPRECAST CONCRETESECTIONGROUT SHELF ANDCHANNELSBASES SHALL BE 8"STANDARD PRECASTWITH 2" LEAN GROUT,OR POURED 8" SLABREINFORCED WITH6" x 6" 10/10 MESHPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTAT CONNECTION -REFER TO SPECSSTORM SEWER PIPE- REFER TOPLAN FOR LOCATION, INVERT,AND SIZESMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTINGRINGS. GROUT BETWEENRINGS, CASTING, AND ALONGOUTSIDE.METAL SEWER CASTING - REFERTO PLAN FOR TYPE6"6"12"6"2.4.5.3B.1.3A.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARYAPPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDETRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPEPORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKESAPPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACTTHE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING12" PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKETOVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12"APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETSWILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETSMUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES INAPPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USINGOPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM , STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THECOLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN.4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6"OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACETHE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVENWITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET.5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END(SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 6" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPEDAREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH.6. BLANKET SHALL BE STAPLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION.NOTE: *IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE ORSTAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15cm) MAY BE NECESSARYTO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS.6"SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGFLOWSTAKE DETAILINSTALLATION DETAILSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSTAKE TO BE PLACED AT TOEOF SLOPE, BOTH SIDES1-1/2" X 18" (MIN) WOOD STAKEBOTTOM OF SWALEWOOD STAKE TOPENETRATE NETTINGMATERIAL ONLYSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSTORM SEWER MANHOLEVARIESREFER TO PLANSFLOWFLOW61BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT,OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESHCOVER SHALL BESTAMPED"STORM SEWER""RIM ELEVATION"PRECAST COVER -8" THICKSTEPS - INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAM SIDE@ 16" O.C.RUBBER GASKET -TYP AT ALL JOINTSPRECAST CONCRETESECTIONPROVIDE FLEXIBLEJOINT - REFER TOSPECSGROUT SHELF ANDCHANNELSPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINT -REFER TO SPECSSTORM SEWER PIPE - SEEPLAN FOR LOCATION,INVERT, AND SIZESMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTINGRINGS. GROUT BETWEENRINGS, CASTING, AND ALONGOUTSIDE.METAL SEWER CASTING - REFERTO PLAN FOR TYPESILT FENCENORMAL USEPOSTS:(IF USED WITHOUTSUPPORT FENCE) WOOD2" SQ. (MIN)@ 4' (MAX)SPACING METAL1.0 lbs/lf (MIN.) "T" OR"U" SECTION @ 4'(MAX) SPACINGNOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH TO WIRE MESH WITHHOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH TIE WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES5' MIN. LENGTH POSTSILT FENCE FABRICOVERLAP FABRIC 6" ANDFASTEN @ 2' INTERVALSEXTEND WIRE MESH INTO TRENCHFABRIC ANCHORAGETRENCH BACKFILL WITHTAMPED NATURAL SOIL6" MIN.NATURAL SOILMETAL STAKE ORWOOD POSTOPTIONAL SUPPORTFENCE (WIRE MESH)PIPE BEDDING - PVCNOTES:TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100%STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILLSHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.DEPTH (VARIES)6" MIN.1/8 O.D.(6" MIN.)O.D. + 2' (MAX)PIPE DIA.FINAL SUBGRADEHAND TAMPEDSAND6.10"0.50"8.38"4.30"TRENCH DRAINTRENCH DRAINASPHALTWEAR COURSEASPHALTBINDER COURSE4" MIN.4" MIN.4" MIN.PLACE CONCRETE ONPREPARED / APPROVED SAND SUB-BASEAGGREGATEBASE COURSECONCRETEENCASEMENTSANDSUB-BASENEW 12" RESILIENTSURFACECONCRETE BEDDINGLEVELING BRICK1C2.2TRENCH DRAIN CONNECTIONTO STORM SEWERSECTION VIEWPROFILE VIEW15" PERFORATED STORM SEWERFIELD CURBRESILIENT SURFACENEW TRACK PAVEMENTSECTIONTRENCH DRAINTRENCH DRAINCATCH BASIN6" PVC RISER PIPE6" PVC RISER PIPETRENCH DRAINCATCH BASIN6" 90° BEND6" 45° BEND (ROTATED)6" 90° BEND6" 45° BEND (ROTATED)15" x 6" WYE (ROTATED)D-AREAPAVEMENTCONCRETEENCASEMENT (4" MIN.)CONCRETEENCASEMENT (4" MIN.)15" x 6" WYE (ROTATED)15" PERFORATED STORM SEWERCLEANOUT ASSEMBLYMCDONALD 74M "A"SERIES CAST IRONMETER PIT FRAMEAND COVERFITTING HUB WITH 4"THREADED PLUG. APPLYTEFLON THREAD TAPE,OR APPROVED EQUAL,OVER THREADS.FINISH GRADELEAVE 24" OF EXCESSWIRE AT SURFACETRACER WIREMAIN15"11 12"24" DIA. x 8" THICK CONCRETESLAB POURED AROUND CASTING(FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT/TURFGRADE)PIPE BEDDING - RCPNOTES:TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100%STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILLSHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.DEPTH (VARIES)1/8 DEPTH (12" MIN.)1/6 O.D.1/8 O.D. (4" MIN.)O.D. + 2' (MAX)FINAL SUBGRADELIGHTLYCOMPACTEDFILLCOMPACTED CRUSHED ROCKOR PEA GRAVEL - 100% PASSINGTHE 34" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUMOF 5% PASSING THE #10 SIEVE.ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021DETAILSDARBJD0V1123087RCP FLARED END SECTION(FES)PIPE SIZE21" & LESS24" TO 36"42" TO 54"60" & GREATER"U" BOLT DIA.1/2"5/8"3/4"1"WIDTH24"24"24"24""U" BOLT REQUIREMENTSNOTES:2 - "U" BOLT FASTENERS TO BE INSTALLED ACROSS EACHJOINT, ONE EACH SIDE OF PIPE AT 60° FROM THE TOP OFTHE PIPE. FASTEN FIRST THREE JOINTS AS SHOWN.CONCRETE PIPE TIES ("U" BOLTS)TRASH GUARD WITH 5/8" DIA.RODS AT 6" ON CENTER.FASTEN TO FES WITH 3HOT DIPPED GALV. CLIPSRIPRAP - REFERTO DETAIL17C2.1RIPRAP - FLARED ENDSECTIOND515D2'-0"D5D12"PLANSECTION A - ASECTION B - B12"18"BBAACLASS III RIPRAPGEOTEXTILE FABRICPLAN FINISH GRADECLASS III RIPRAPGEOTEXTILE FABRICPLAN FINISH GRADEFABRIC SHALL COVER THE AREAOF THE RIPRAP AND EXTENDUNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3'CURB BOX AND WATERSERVICE CONNECTION8'-0" MIN. COVER8'-0" MIN. COVERVARIESSEE NOTE BELOW45°NOTE: 1' OF SLACK TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT.HORIZONTAL OFFSET MAY HAVE TO BE USED INSOME CASES TO INSURE A MINIMUM OF 8'-0" OFCOVER OVER SERVICE LINE.CURBSTOPREFER TO PLANFOR CONTINUATIONPROVIDE CAP FOREND OF CURB STOPCONCRETE PATIO BLOCKOR 4" CONCRETE BLOCKCONTINUOUS PIECE OF COPPERSERVICE PIPE FROM EXISTINGSERVICE TO CURB STOPEXISTING2" COPPER SERVICECORPORATIONCOCKCURB BOXSURGE BASINRIPRAP AT SURGE BASINPLANAA5'5'5'2'PIPE SIZE VARIES - REFER TO PLANNOTE:GEOTEXTILE FABRIC REQUIRED UNDER RIP RAP.12" DEPTH MIN. CLASSIII RIPRAP (TYPICAL)BBSECTION A - A6"12" DEPTH MIN. CLASSIII RIPRAP (TYPICAL)PIPEPIPE INVERTMIRROROPPOSITE SIDE3'-0"5'-0"GEOTEXTILE FABRICGEOTEXTILE FABRICCONTINUOUS UNDERSURGE BASINSURGE BASINWEEP HOLESFILTRATION AREA FINISH GRADE12" DEPTH MIN. CLASSIII RIPRAP (TYPICAL)FILTRATIONAREA FINISHGRADEGEOTEXTILE FABRICCONTINUOUS UNDERSURGE BASINSURGE BASINWEEP HOLES6"3'-0"5'-0"2'-0"C2.118TEMPORARY DIVERSIONBERMPLAN VIEWSECTION A-AAADISTURBED EARTH2'MIN.24" MIN.2' MIN.UNDISTURBEDEARTHDISTURBED EARTH2:1 SLOPE ORFLATTER2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTERSILT FENCESILT FENCE21WHERE POSSIBLE, 10'UNDISTURBED EARTHUPHILL OF SILT FENCEC2.11FINGER DRAIN3"3"3"PAVEMENT SECTIONREFER TO DETAIL6"3" MINIMUMUNDER TILEWRAP TRENCH AND PEA ROCKWITH GEOTEXTILE FABRICPEA ROCK AROUND TILE6" DRAIN TILE - LENGTH OF INDIVIDUALFINGER DRAIN SHALL BE 30' MINIMUMUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.YARD HYDRANTFOUNTAINSPIGOT4" SAND BASEPEDESTAL TYPEYARD HYDRANT1/2" VALVE1" TYPE K" COPPER WATER SERVICE4" PVC DRAIN LINEREFER TO DRAWINGSFOR CONTINUATION- CONNECT TO CB 4E @INV. = 924.90REDUCERSTAINLESSSTEEL CARRIERWATER OUTLET8" AREA DRAINREFER TOPLAN8C2.118"8'-0"1" RISER WITH BLINDFLANGE TAPPED TORECEIVE 1" PLUGFOR WINTERBLOWOUTCURBSTOP1" COPPER WATERSERVICE20"YARD HYDRANTPUSH BUTTON29"8' BURYWALL IN BETWEENNOT SHOWN2'-3' BURY2'-3' BURYCURBSTOP8C2.1 CONCRETECURBTURF SECTION ATMULTI-PURPOSE FIELD - ALTERNATE 16" DEPTH 34" GRANITE(POROUS AGGREGATE)2" DEPTH TRAP ROCK(POROUS AGGREGATE)TURF CARPET WITHIN-FILL (BY OTHERS)1/2" RADIUS (TYPICAL)EXCEPT FOR AREAABUTTING PAVEMENTGEOTEXTILEFABRIC2' SANDSUBBASE GRASSNAILER BOARDFASTENED TO CURB5"15"7"11 MIN. 6"TOPSOIL20.00'12" PERFORATED PVC -ELEVATION VARIES - REFERTO PLAN3" MIN. PEA ROCKAROUND DRAINTILEGEOTEXTILE FABRIC6" DRAINTILE-REFER TO PLAN FORLOCATION AND INVERT3" MIN. PEA ROCKAROUND DRAINTILEGEOTEXTILE FABRICWRAP DRAINTILE ANDPEAROCK WITHGEOTEXTILE FABRIC8C2.2FLAT DT TO COLLECTOR PIPECONNECTIONGRANITE (POROUS AGGREGATE)TRAP ROCK (POROUS AGGREGATE)TURF CARPET WITH IN-FILL (BY OTHERS)SANDSUBBASEPREPARED SUBGRADESUBGRADE ELEVATIONVARIES - REFER TO PLANAND DETAILS1" x 12" FLAT TILEVARIES - REFER TO UTILITY PLAN:12" OR 15" PERFORATED STORMSEWER4" DRAIN TILE12" FLAT AdvanEDGEOUTLET ADAPTER22° BENDVARIES - REFER TOUTILITY PLAN:4 X 12" WYE,OR 4 X 15 WYE4" DRAIN TILE12" FLAT AdvanEDGEOUTLET ADAPTER1" x 12" FLAT TILESECTIONPLANVARIES - REFER TO UTILITY PLAN:12" OR 15" PERFORATED STORMSEWERVARIES - REFER TO UTILITY PLAN:12" OR 15" PERFORATED STORMSEWERVARIES - REFER TOUTILITY PLAN:4 X 12" WYE,OR 4 X 15 WYE,ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTSBETHEL UNIVERSITY3900 Bethel DrSt Paul, MN 551123003/17/2021CITY 02/16/2021CITY RESUBMIT 03/24/2021DETAILSDARBJD0V1123087TYPICAL SECTION THRUFILTRATION AREAFILTRATION AREALIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLANSEE NOTE 7 OF 12 / C2.2 FOR ENGINEERED SOIL MIXTUREPLACE SEDIMENT LOG AT EDGE OF FILTRATION AREA - FULLPERIMETER , AND REMOVE ONCE ALL UPSLOPE AREAS AREFULLY STABILIZED (PERMANENT STABILIZATION)FLAT BOTTOM11UTILITY TRACERWIRE (TYPICAL)6" DRAIN TILE WITH 3" MIN. PEA ROCKSURROUNDING, WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC- REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION AND INVERT12" MIN.GRASSFILTRATION AREA SOILMIXTURE - SEE BELOW6" DEPTHTOPSOILMINERAL SOD30" MIN.3"FILTRATION AREACONSTRUCTION NOTESFILTRATION AREA CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:1. FILTRATION AREA LIMITS SHALL BE SURVEYED AND A VISUAL BARRIER, SUCH AS ORANGE SNOW FENCE, SHALL BEPLACED AROUND THE FULL PERIMETER TO KEEP ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL STOCKPILESOUT OF THE PROPOSED FILTRATION AREA. THE VISUAL BARRIER MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE NEW CONSTRUCTIONBEGINS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.2. DELIVER SAMPLE MATERIALS ONSITE FOR PRIOR APPROVAL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE INSTALLATION, SUFFICIENTMATERIAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE ONSITE TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION AND STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL AREASWITHOUT DELAY.3. CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID CONTAMINATION OF ENGINEERED SOILS WITH SEDIMENT, IN-SITU OR TOPSOIL DURINGAND AFTER INSTALLATION. MATERIALS MUST BE SEGREGATED.4. INSTALLATION WITH DRY SOIL CONDITIONS IS CRITICAL TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. SCHEDULE WORKFOR PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER. DO NOT WORK IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE WET. EXCAVATION, SOIL PLACEMENT ANDRAPID STABILIZATION OF PERIMETER SLOPES WITH TURF SOD MUST COMPLETED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATIONEVENT. TURF SOD PLACED IN FLOW PATHS SHALL BE SECURED WITH AT LEAST 6 STAKES PER SQUARE YARD. PLACESTAKES ALONG UPHILL SEAM EDGES TO PREVENT UNDERMINING FLOWS UNTIL SOD ROOTS ESTABLISH.5. DO NOT LEAVE STORMWATER AREAS AND / OR PERIMETER SLOPES EXPOSED OVERNIGHT. SECURE THE SITE FROM RISKOF PRECIPITATION DAMAGES AT THE END OF EVERY WORK DAY. IN THE EVENT OF RAIN, TAKE ACTION TO DIVERTSTORMWATER AWAY FROM THE WORK AREA AND TEMPORARILY COVER OF ALL EXPOSED SOILS WITH FILTER FABRICOR IMPERMEABLE SHEETING.6. FIELD OBSERVATION OF EXCAVATION AND SOIL PLACEMENT IS REQUIRED. NOTIFY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TODIGGING. USE BACKHOE WITH TOOTH BUCKET FOR CELL EXCAVATION TO AVOID COMPACTING OR SMEARING OF SOILS.(DO NOT USE SKID STEER FOR EXCAVATION WITHIN THE CELL) USE EXCAVATOR BUCKET TO PLACE MATERIALS.CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED INTO THE STORMWATER AREAS. LEVELING AND FINAL GRADINGWITHIN THE CELL MUST BE COMPLETED BY HAND.7. FILTRATION AREA SOIL MIX SHALL BE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL 4.1.2 MIX B: ENHANCED FILTRATION BLEND(WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70% ASTM C-33 COARSE WASHED SAND (MN/DOT 3126) AND 30% MN/DOT 3890 GRADE 2LEAF LITTER COMPOST. THE MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE COMPOST HAS BEENSAMPLED AND TESTED AS REQUIRED BY THE SEAL OF TESTING ASSURANCE (STA) PROGRAM OF THE UNITED STATESCOMPOSTING COUNCIL (USCC) AND A GRADATION SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR THE WASHED SAND. THE ENGINEERED SOILSHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY TOPSOIL OR FILTER AGGREGATE WITH FINES.8. INSTALL MINERAL SOD.9. INSTALLED SOD REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 1" OF WATER PER WEEK AND ACTIVE WEED MANAGEMENT UNTIL WELLESTABLISHED. WATERING COSTS ARE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO SOD INSTALLATION. CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARYIRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONSISTING OF ABOVE GROUND HEADS, PIPING, VALVES, ETC., FOR WATERING UNTIL VEGETATIONIS ESTABLISHED. DO NOT USE A WATER TRUCK AS THE FORCE OF THE WATER WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THESTORMWATER AREA SOILS.10. REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DONE BY HAND OR, IF SELF-PROPELLED EQUIPMENT ISREQUIRED, FROM OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF THE FILTRATION AREAS.OUTLET CONTROLSTRUCTURE (OCS 1)SECTIONPLAN72" INSIDEDIAM.PIPE INV. = SEE SECTIONPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTAT CONNECTION - REFERTO SPECS24" RCP PIPE IN6'-0"24" RCP PIPE ININV. = 916.38BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARDPRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT,OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCEDWITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESHPRECAST CONCRETESECTIONSTORM SEWER PIPE - REFER TO UTILITYPLANS FOR PIPE LENGTHS AND SLOPESCONCRETE BAFFLE WITH #4REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYSDOWELED INTO SIDE WALLSOF INSIDE OF STRUCTUREAND BOTTOM SLAB.TOP WEIR = 918.38HWL = 919.176"WEIR WALLRIM ELEVATION = 925.75PRECAST COVER -8" THICKMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTINGRINGS. GROUT BETWEENRINGS, CASTING, AND ALONGOUTSIDE. NEENAH R-1642 CASTING6" DT FROM UGS 1B. CONNECTBEHIND WEIR WALL15" RCP PIPE OUTINV. = 913.606" DT FROM UGS 1B ININV. = 913.60. INSTALLBEHIND WEIR WALL.PIPE INV. = SEE SECTION15" RCP PIPEOUTPROVIDE FLEXIBLEJOINT (TYP)CONSTRUCTION LOADINGDIAGRAMCONSTRUCTION LOADSFOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE LOADS, AN EXTRA AMOUNT OF COMPACTED COVERMAY BE REQUIRED OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE. THE HEIGHT-OF-COVER SHALL MEET THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE BELOW. THE USE OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTNECESSITATES GREATER PROTECTION FOR THE PIPE THAN FINISHED GRADE COVER MINIMUMSFOR NORMAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC.PIPE SPAN,INCHES18-50MINIMUM COVER (FT)AXLE LOADS (kips)50-7575-110 110-15012-422.0 2.53.03.04.03.53.048-723.03.078-1203.54.04.04.54.54.0126-1443.5*MINIMUM COVER MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON LOCAL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDETHE ADDITIONAL COVER REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE PIPE. MINIMUM COVER IS MEASUREDFROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE TO THE TOP OF THE MAINTAINED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SURFACE.HEIGHTOF COVERTEMPORARY COVER FORCONSTRUCTION LOADSFINISHGRADEMANHOLE CAPNOTES1.DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO, 17th EDITION.2.DESIGN LOAD HS25.3.EARTH COVER = 1' MAX.4.CONCRETE STRENGTH = 4,500 psi5.REINFORCING STEEL = ASTM A615, GRADE 60.6.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REINFORCING AROUND OPENINGS EQUAL TO THE BARSINTERRUPTED, HALF EACH SIDE. ADDITIONAL BARS TO BE IN THE SAME PLANE.7.TRIM OPENING WITH DIAGONAL #4 BARS, EXTEND BARS A MINIMUM OF 12" BEYONDOPENING, BEND BARS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN BAR COVER.8.PROTECTION SLAB AND ALL MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BYCONTRACTOR.SECTION VIEWPLAN VIEW54"Ø30" CMP RISER32"1" GAP(TYP. ALL SIDES)2" COVER TYP.8"12"CMP PROTECTION SLABØ36" MAX., HS-25 ACCESSCASTING TO BE PROVIDED ANDINSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR11" TYP.2" COVE R ( T Y P.)Ø54"Ø32"2" COVER (TYP.)#4 DIAGONAL TRIMBAR (TYP. 4 PLACES),SEE NOTE 7.OPENING INPROTECTION SLABFOR CASTINGINTERRUPTED BARREPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6.REINFORCING -#5 @ 10" OCEWBACKFILL DETAILFOUNDATION/BEDDING PREPARATIONPRIOR TO PLACING THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND OPEN GRADED STONE, THE FOUNDATION MUSTBE CONSTRUCTED TO A UNIFORM AND STABLE SUBGRADE. IN THE EVENT THAT UNSUITABLEFOUNDATION MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION, THEY SHALL BE REMOVEDAND BROUGHT BACK TO SUBGRADE WITH SAND SUBBASE.BACKFILLWHEN PLACING THE FIRST LIFTS OF BACKFILL IT IS IMPORTANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEBACKFILL IS PROPERLY COMPACTED UNDER AND AROUND THE PIPE HAUNCHES. BACKFILLSHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THERE IS NO MORE THAN A TWO LIFT (16") DIFFERENTIAL BETWEENANY OF THE PIPES AT ANY TIME DURING THE BACKFILL PROCESS. THE BACKFILL SHALL BEADVANCED ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE DETENTION SYSTEM AT THE SAME RATE TO AVOIDDIFFERENTIAL LOADING ON THE PIPE.SAND SUBBASEPLACED IN 8" LIFTSGEOTEXTILE FABRIC (REFER TO SPEC SECTION 33 40 00)BURRITO WRAP (ENTIRE ASSEMBLY)MIN. 24" SEAM OVERLAPOPEN GRADED STONETYPICAL PERFORATIONDETAIL1.50"2.8"COIL WIDTH2.05"2 2/3" x 1/2"CORRUGATION - STEELAND ALUMINUM CMPEDGE SPACING EQUALON BOTH SIDESTYPICAL RISER DETAILELEVATIONENDRISER (TYP.)SEE DETAIL PROJECT SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USALighƟng System Pole / Fixture SummaryPole IDPole HeightMtg HeightFixture QtyLuminaire TypeLoadCircuitF1-F290'90'1TLC-LED-12001.17 kWA90'10TLC-LED-150014.30 kWA90'1TLC-LED-4000.40 kWA20'2TLC-BT-5751.15 kWAF3-F480'80'1TLC-LED-12001.17 kWA80'9TLC-LED-150012.87 kWA19'2TLC-BT-5751.15 kWA80'3TLC-LED-15004.29 kWB80'1TLC-LED-4000.40 kWA46073.80 kW Circuit SummaryCircuitDescriptionLoadFixture QtyAFootball65.22 kW54BSoccer 28.58 kW6 Fixture Type SummaryTypeSourceWattageLumensL90L80L70QuantityTLC-LED-1500LED 5700K - 75 CRI1430W160,000>120,000>120,000>120,00044TLC-LED-400LED 5700K - 75 CRI400W46,500>120,000>120,000>120,0004TLC-BT-575LED 5700K - 75 CRI575W52,000>120,000>120,000>120,0008TLC-LED-1200LED 5700K - 75 CRI1170W136,000>120,000>120,000>120,0004Light Level Summary Calculation Grid SummaryIlluminationGrid NameCalculation MetricAveMinMaxMax/MinAve/MinCircuitsFixture QtyFootballHorizontal Illuminance53.639671.741.37A54Home BleachersHorizontal14.76213.402.44A54Property LineHorizontal0.1100.370.00A,B60Property LineMax Candela (by Fixture)2709117.51094726273.161552.48A,B60Property LineMax Vertical Illuminance Metric0.3701.280.00A,B60Soccer 2Horizontal Illuminance9.8502688833.59B6SoccerHorizontal Illuminance53.839661.691.38A54Track SpillHorizontal Illuminance0.0300.0741.34A54Track SpillMax Candela Metric95563082812591.3431.04A54Track SpillMax Vertical Illuminance Metric0.120.010.2641.3011.60A54TrackHorizontal Illuminance22.55499.184.51A54Visitor BleachersHorizontal11.77162.321.67A54 $WWDFKPHQW( ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21544639394550665749475360676052515558625852515658585451525656555251515351555251515351585451525656625852515758676152515559675749475461554640394651HIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT G-TRIPLEETSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F4185'103'173'105'185'103'173'105'SCALE IN FEET 1 : 500'50'100'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: FootballSize: 360' x 160'Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridGuaranteed Average:50Scan Average: 53.56Maximum: 67Minimum: 39Avg / Min: 1.39Guaranteed Max / Min:2Max / Min: 1.74UG (adjacent pts): 1.25CU: 0.49No. of Points: 72LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21SOCCE20171614129211817161411201918171612191918161613191816141411181614121191715131081614119716131186171411971715131191817151211919181715141119191817161320191817161221181716141120171614129F1F2185'103'185'103'SCALE IN FEET 1 : 200'20'40'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Home BleachersSize: 360' x 160'Spacing: 10.0' x 10.0'ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average:14.66Maximum: 21Minimum: 6Avg / Min: 2.43Max / Min:3.40UG (adjacent pts): 1.38CU: 0.02No. of Points: 97LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-2113141611131510111481013791379128101391114111215131316F3F4173'105'173'105'SCALE IN FEET 1 : 200'20'40'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Visitor BleachersSize: 360' x 160'Spacing: 10.0' x 10.0'ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average:11.66Maximum: 16Minimum: 7Avg / Min: 1.74Max / Min:2.32UG (adjacent pts): 1.39CU: 0.00No. of Points: 30LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21HIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELDG-TRIPLEPETSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010515444393946506265554848546061665952515658556257525257575258545153575451555251525450515552515254505258545153575455625752525757616659525156586265564948556052554540404751196'103'162'105'196'103'162'105'F1F3F2F4SCALE IN FEET 1 : 500'50'100'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'.43'90.43'90.43'20.43'90.43'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'.43'80.43'80.43'19.43'80.43'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: SoccerSize: 345' x 210'Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridGuaranteed Average:50Scan Average: 53.81Maximum: 66Minimum: 39Avg / Min: 1.37Guaranteed Max / Min:2Max / Min: 1.69UG (adjacent pts): 1.25CU: 0.57No. of Points: 84LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21HIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELDONG-TRIPLEUMPPOLEAULTSOCCER (210'x345')10102020303040405050404030302020101025 29 24 24 27 24 26 25 24 272821171310981013213348474038333135394249432615107555679132118 8196'90'162'118'196'116'162'92'F1F3F2F4SCALE IN FEET 1 : 500'50'100'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: TrackSize: IrregularSpacing: 30.0' x 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average:22.54Maximum: 49Minimum: 5Avg / Min: 4.26Max / Min:9.18UG (adjacent pts): 0.00CU: 0.13No. of Points: 46LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESMULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')0141018201601411192019015101722210141017252001410171915014101818100141221261301410192515013915172001381522240137132325001481316130'58'130'152'F3F4SCALE IN FEET 1 : 500'50'100'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F3-F480'.43'80.43'80.43'19.43'80.43'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*000311292TOTALS32626 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Soccer 2Size: 345' x 195'Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average:9.85Maximum: 26Minimum: 0Avg / Min: 33028.69Max / Min:88833.59UG (adjacent pts): 1166.11CU: 0.79No. of Points: 84LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: BNo. of Luminaires: 6Total Load: 8.58 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your MuscoWarranty document and includes a 0.95dirt depreciaƟon factor.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F40.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.030.020.020.010.010.020.020.030.030.020.020.020.030.040.050.060.060.050.050.040.040.040.040.050.060.070.070.050.040.010.000.000.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.010.010.000.000.000.020.030.040.050.040.040.030.030.030.030.040.050.060.060.050.050.040.030.010.020.010.010.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.02SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Track SpillSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average: 0.0294Maximum: 0.07Minimum: 0.00No. of Points: 83LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F40.11 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.150.120.100.090.070.090.090.110.100.090.070.080.130.190.240.240.260.220.210.150.130.140.140.160.180.200.180.120.080.030.010.010.020.030.040.050.050.050.050.040.030.020.010.010.040.070.100.140.130.110.110.100.110.130.180.220.240.230.220.200.160.120.060.070.050.050.060.080.070.060.060.070.070.10SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Track SpillSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAX VERTICAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average: 0.1160Maximum: 0.26Minimum: 0.01No. of Points: 83LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F411881 16433 19640 18293 21587 19426 17756 18288 21169 16520128521097992988666875576127626649261854689382812276206542620924567255602146118025130979841798265655554501155374719258815335433998821387260723143332293632923323225323881227712308834175027104653480643754690541470421279421872262422812523565219201916615451115015263428032333571383646834882552668298300796510843SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*112900034TOTALS60546 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Track SpillSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYCANDELA (PER FIXTURE)EnƟre GridScan Average: 9556.3105Maximum: 28124.78Minimum: 307.92No. of Points: 83LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: ANo. of Luminaires: 54Total Load: 65.22 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F40.240.330.370.360.300.220.190.140.100.070.060.060.050.040.050.090.150.120.010.010.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.00SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1200'120'240'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*1121200004TOTALS60600 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Property LineSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average: 0.1059Maximum: 0.37Minimum: 0.00No. of Points: 28LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: A, BNo. of Luminaires: 60Total Load: 73.8 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F40.891.221.281.261.090.810.700.490.330.240.190.200.160.130.150.250.430.360.050.030.020.020.010.000.000.000.000.00SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1200'120'240'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*1121200004TOTALS60600 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Property LineSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAX VERTICAL FOOTCANDLESEnƟre GridScan Average: 0.3685Maximum: 1.28Minimum: 0.00No. of Points: 28LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: A, BNo. of Luminaires: 60Total Load: 73.8 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F485487109472107354906138868869675578843337616776928392831092192598218585881621714315220157813751093865431265164602317SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1200'120'240'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112101121000002F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*1121200004TOTALS60600 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonPole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Property LineSpacing: 30.0'Height: 3.0' above gradeILLUMINATION SUMMARYCANDELA (PER FIXTURE)EnƟre GridScan Average: 27090.7793Maximum: 109472.14Minimum: 17.45No. of Points: 28LUMINAIRE INFORMATIONApplied Circuits: A, BNo. of Luminaires: 60Total Load: 73.8 kWGuaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION describedabove is guaranteed per your Musco Warrantydocument.Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary fromcomputer-calculated predicƟons and should be takenin accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. EQUIPMENT LAYOUTNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of MuscoSports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNBy: Joe Seda · File #209568B · 09-Feb-21Football360' x 160'OVERHEADPOWER LINESHIGHJUMP\pxqc;STEEPLE CHASE PIT MULTI-PURPOSEFIELD(~195'x345')LONG-TRIPLEJUMP/ POLEVAULTSOCCER (210'x345')101020203030404050504040303020201010F1F2F3F4Soccer345' x 210'TrackSoccer 2345' x 195'SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'Pole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟveto 0,0 reference point(s)Bethel University Royal Stadium FootballSaint Paul, MN USAEQUIPMENT LAYOUTINCLUDES:· Football· Soccer· Soccer 2· TrackElectrical System Requirements:Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the"Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3%nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons.EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole LuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLE2F1-F290'-90'90'20'90'TLC-LED-400TLC-LED-1200TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-1500112102F3-F480'-80'80'19'80'TLC-LED-1200TLC-LED-400TLC-BT-575TLC-LED-150011*29/3*4TOTALS60 * This structure uƟlizes a back-to-back mounƟng conĮguraƟonSINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHARTBallast SpeciĮcaƟons(.90 min power factor)Line Amperage Per Luminaire(max draw)Single Phase Voltage208(60)220(60)240(60)277(60)347(60)380(60)480(60)TLC-LED-1500 8.5 8.1 7.4 6.4 5.1 4.7 3.7TLC-LED-400 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.0TLC-BT-575 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.5TLC-LED-1200 7.0 6.6 6.1 5.2 4.2 4.0 3.0 Solutions for Lighting©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · U.S. and foreign patents issued and pending · M-3047-en04-1Total Light Control™–TLC-LED-1500 Luminaire Z 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 ZHRGREEN.COM March 11, 2021 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Athletic Improvements Bethel University - Engineering Plan Review Comments Dear David, An engineering plan review has been performed on the 2021 Land Use Application, signed Feb. 16, 2021 for the Athletic Improvements, Bethel University. A summary of the review comments follows: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 1. Application notes Sanitary and Water main as completed. Items were shown in legends but did not see any on plans. Need to be shown and detailed. SURVEY 2. Survey is not signed. PLAN SHEETS C1.0 – TITLE SHEET 3. General Notes a. Note 3 – Add note that no work shall begin until all permits are obtained and submitted to, and accepted by, the City. b. Note 4 – Add note that no work shall begin until traffic plans are submitted, reviewed or approved by the City. Of if none required, remove note. Note 7 – Who is responsible for dewatering permits? C1.1 – EXISTING CONDITIONS 4. What is the scalloped line at the end of the “remote trees and shrubs” area? 5. What utility is being removed with the remove utility symbol? 6. Ex. gravel access road is shown encroaching on RR ROW. Prior to construction, written approval needed to work off-site. C1.11 – EXISTING CONDITIONS 7. Property line note dashed in legend. 8. Are heavy font elevations proposed elevations? Signed survey is now attached. Note added to plans. No traffic plans are anticipated being required. Note #7 has been changed to indicate contractor is responsible for de-watering requirements. This is now note #8. New tree limits. Removed from C1.1 Storm sewer - 18" CMP. All work is to occur on-site. No off-site construction will occur. Dashed Property Line. No, all spot elevations shown on sheet C1.11 are existing. No sanitary or water main. Removed from legends. Attachment F David Swearingen March 4, 2021 2 C1.2 – SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN 9. What do the scalloping lines represent? C1.3 – SITE FINISHING PLAN 10. Missing detail number on detail callouts 11. What are dark squares and triangles on this sheet? 12. Add grading info for relocated dirt access road. Ensure it does not drain of-site. 13. Is there a set-back requirement for the dirt access road or fence from the property line? 14. Is fence constructable in location shown without encroaching on adjacent property? C1.31 – SITE FINISHING PLAN 15. What is THROWS in title? 16. Missing detail number in call-out. Typ. C1.4 – GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 17. No piping shown to CB’s or MH’s. 18. What is the scalloped lone representing? 19. What is the double line with black dot representing? (e.g., though boring B-8) 20. What is single line with black dots representing? 21. Provide path elevations. C1.41 – GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 22. Are dark elevations proposed elevations? C1.5 – UTILITY PLAN 23. Missing info in UGS 1A Section detail 24. Filtration Areas a. Shows nodes with no structure. b. No pipe information shown. c. No inlets shown. d. Different pipes styles are shown. 25. Notes 1 - XXXX sheets are referenced for notes. 26. Proposed water and sanitary are shown in legend, but not on plans. 27. Not all pipe types are shown in legend. C1.6 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 28. Structures shown with no connecting pipes. 29. What are proposed contours typing into? 30. Are dark elevations proposed? 31. What is 6-feet tall? 32. Scalloped line is not in legend. 33. Scale units missing New tree limits. Added to legend. Added detail callouts and details to plans. Added to legend. See sheet C1.4 for grading. Don't believe so, since the access road isn't paved. City code mentions fences of at least 75% opacity are allowed in setback. Yes, concrete fence footing is 2' from property line at closest point.Indicates throw events area. Added detail callouts and details to plans. Will superimpose pipe routes on grading plan. New tree limits. Added to legend.Proposed chainlink fence w/ maintenance strip. Shown on C1.3. Proposed chainlink fencing. Shown on C1.3. A few more spots along path have been added. Dark spot elevations outside grading limits have been frozen. UGS Details on sheet C2.2. Infiltration design has been completed adding items a,b,c,d. Detail bubbles have been completed. Water shown on plan, Sanitary removed. Added other pipe type to legend. Existing 6' fence. Yes, within grading limits. Added existing contours. Shaded in connecting pipes. New tree limits. Added to legend. Added scale bar. David Swearingen March 4, 2021 3 34. Show construction entrance use will not encroach off property. L1.0 - LANDSCAPE PLAN 35. Scale missing units 36. Water quality volume and details are not shown on plans. C2.1 - DETAILS 37. 3/C2.1 – What is wood stake dimension? 38. 4/C2.1 number used twice. 39. 4/C2.1 PIPE BEDDING – No pipe wrap for perforated pipe? 40. 9/C2.1 – How will detailed wrap drain tile into san subbase be constructed? 41. 10/C2.1 – How will detailed wrap drain tile into san subbase be constructed? 42. 11/C2.1 – How will detailed wrap drain tile into san subbase be constructed? 43. Missing detail callout numbers in several details 44. Detail watermain offset information. No watermains are shown on utility plans. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT 45. Confirm 2, 10 and 100 event runoff is per checklist and are ATLAS 14. Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Athletic Improvements Bethel University plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director Construction entrance shown on property. Added units to legend. 1-1/2" x 18" min. Added to detail. Re-Numbered all details. Trench subbase, lay geotextile fabric, pour pearock in, wrap rock with fabric, pour in sand. Re-Numbered all details / callouts. Removed watermain detail. New detail. Non-perforated pipe. Refer to sheet C1.5 & C1.51. Event runoffs are per checklist and are ATLAS 14. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM DATE:April 7, 2021 PC Agenda Item 3.C TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM:Jane Kansier, AICP, Planning Consultant, Bolton & Menk SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-004 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Dan Rae, Kensington Development Partners Property Location: 3787 Lexington Avenue Request: Amended Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review Requested Action Dan Rae of Kensington Development Partners (“The Applicant”) is requesting an Amended Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3787 Lexington Avenue (“Subject Property”). This development includes the demolition of the existing multi- tenant building to accommodate a 43,000 square foot grocery store. The existing PUD Master Plan for Phase III depicts (2) separate one-story buildings, one 17,841 SF Retail Anchor and one 15,210 SF Retail/Office building. Background 1. Overview of Request In 2013, the City approved a Master Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Roberts Management’s proposed Lexington Station redevelopment project,located at the southwest corner of Lexington Avenue North and Red Fox Road. The total project area is 7.57 acres and is comprised of three parcels. The proposed development would be completed in three (3) phases. Phase I of the redevelopment was completed in 2013-2014 and included the demolition of the former Blue Fox Restaurant and the construction of a 15,340 square foot multi-tenant commercial building with a drive through. Phase II consisted of removing the existing building at 1120 Red Fox Road and constructing a new 16,922 square foot multi-tenant commercial building with a drive through. Phase II was completed in in the fall of 2018. The approved plan for Phase III or the Subject Site consists of a 15,210 square foot multi-tenant commercial building with a drive through and a standalone 17,841 square foot box retail building on 4.24 acres as shown below and in Attachment C. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 2 of 10 The Subject Site is currently owned by Roberts Management and contains an existing building that was constructed in 1980 and is approximately 63,000 square feet. The Applicant is proposing to amend the Master PUD to accommodate a standalone 43,000 square foot grocery store. The proposed grocery store would be new to the Minnesota market. However, at this time the Applicant is unable to disclose the name of the proposed user due to non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1.District Provisions (B-3 Service Business District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Retail Mixed Use on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. The changes to the Master Plan that the Applicants propose are complementary to the use of the Subject Property. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment D. The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 3 of 10 Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% Unknown Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. 140.5 ft. Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. 37 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) 68 ft. (min) / 229 ft. (total) Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. 183,694 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 ft. 35 ft. The proposed development meets the general district provision requirements. 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Exterior Materials –Meets Requirements At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. Trim and other accent or decorative features may be metal, wood, split faced block, EIFS, or stucco. Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. The Applicant is proposing to construct the building to match and complement the design of the existing buildings of Phase I and II. The use of similar materials and design features will seek to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The transparency requirements for businesses within the B-3 District have been considered in the development and the proposal plan will use opaque windows in the anticipated service areas. The non-primary facades will utilize rock face concrete masonry unit (CMU), utilizing colors consistent with the brick building material on the non-primary façade of the retail building in Phase II and the previously approved material in the PUD. The building would be 19 percent brick masonry, 10 percent glass, and 2 percent stone, for a total of 30 percent. Rock face CMU comprises 54 percent, Phenolic Panels are proposed for 12 percent and metal storefront is proposed for the remaining 4 percent of the total façade area. Examples of Phenolic Panels can be found on newly remodeled Target Stored as shown on the image below and in Attachment D. The Phenolic Panels are a flat panel reinforced with wood fibers with a decorative surface that is resistant to weather and sun. Building elevations are shown in Attachment E. The applicant has submitted a materials board to staff. The figure below illustrates the proposed building materials. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 4 of 10 B. Lighting – Meets Requirements of Zoning Code and PUD The Zoning Code requires exterior lighting to be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. The proposed plan includes wall mounted lights around the building, and area lights on 25’ poles in the parking lot and drive aisles. The proposed lighting is consistent with the use and the surrounding area. C. Screening and Fencing –Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. The proposed dumpsters are located on the northwest side of the building, and are enclosed with galvanized panels. The plans do not identify any rooftop mechanical equipment. Staff recommends including a requirement screening of any rooftop equipment be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets as a condition of approval. D. Tree Preservation –Meets Requirements A Tree Preservation Plan is required as part of an application when City grading permit or erosion control permit is required. The Tree Protection Plan submitted by the Applicant shows that 30 caliper inches of significant trees are set for removal. The Ordinance allows 10% (3 caliper inches) to be removed without replacement. The remaining 27 caliper inches to be removed must be replaced at a ratio of 1 caliper inch for each 2 inches removed. The Applicant is required to replant 14 caliper inches. The proposed landscaping plan identifies a total of 15 caliper inches of replacement trees, and 134 caliper inches of new landscaping. The proposed replacement trees included a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees. As a condition of approval, staff recommends a landscaping letter of credit or escrow be required. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 5 of 10 E. Snow Storage – Meets Requirements Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant is proposing to store snow in the southwest corner of the proposed site. F. Parking Setbacks –Flexibility Requested The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right- of-way of any public street. Flexibility was granted for the parking spaces on the northern side of Phase I and II which are approximately 9 feet from the Red Fox Road right-of-way (ROW). The Applicant is requesting a similar reduction in parking setback from the ROW be granted due to wide County ROW on Lexington Avenue. The Applicant is proposing a 7.51 feet setback from the ROW. The approved Phase I drive through on the east side of the building adjacent to Lexington Avenue has approximately a three (3) foot setback from the ROW. G. Number of Parking Stalls –Flexibility Requested Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. Retail Sales uses must provide one (1) parking space for each 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The proposed plan would consist of a one-story 43,000 square foot grocery store and would require 287 parking spaces. The Applicant is proposing 207 parking spaces and 437 total for the development. The table on the next page breaks down the parking from the different phases and the approved PUD requirements. Phase I and II Parking Requirements Land Use Total Square Footage of Phase I & II Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency/Surplus Retail -1 space per 150 SF of gross sales floor space 32,262 sq. ft.215 230 +15 Proposed Phase III Proposed Parking Land Use Total Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency/Surplus Retail -1 space per 150 SF of gross sales floor space 43,000 sq. ft.287 207 -80 Approved Master Plan Parking Requirements Land Use Total Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency/Surplus Retail -1 space per 150 SF of gross sales floor space 65,313 sq. ft.436 413 -23 Proposed Amended Master Plan Parking Requirements Land Use Total Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Deficiency/Surplus City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 6 of 10 Retail -1 space per 150 SF of gross sales floor space 75,262 sq. ft.502 437 -65 At this time, staff has not seen an interior floor plan and cannot determine the required parking as the proposed project could host a variety of uses (retail, office, and storage). Each use is subject to minimum parking requirements in the Zoning Code and could offset the parking deficiencies. H. Freestanding Signs –Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. The Applicant would like to utilize the previously PUD approved monument sign standards. The approved monument signs measure 26 feet in height and have a total sign copy area of 171.9 square feet (see Attachment F). I. Wall Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed wall signs up to 80 square feet. The Applicant is requesting flexibly for a 90 and 180 square feet sign above the main entrances to the building (east elevation facing Lexington Ave) and a 90 square feet sign on the north elevation (facing previous Lexington Station phases and Red Fox Road). 2.Traffic Study and Proposed New Lexington Avenue Access A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment G). This study is currently being reviewed by the city’s traffic consultant. The study reviewed existing operations within the area, evaluated traffic impacts to the roadway network, and recommended improvements to the proposed development site. SRF and the Applicant are aware that the County intends to reconstruct Lexington Avenue between County Road E and I-694 in 2022, and included that in the evaluation. In summary, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 165 a.m. peak hour, 398 p.m. peak hour, and 4,592 daily site trips. Results of the year 2023 build operations analysis indicate the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection cross-street approach movements are expected to have significant queuing and delay as an unsignalized intersection. The proposed eastbound approach vehicle queuing storage is limited (approximately 100 feet). Infrequently, when this storage is filled, queues are expected to extend into the parking lot, which may infrequently and for very brief periods of time, block parking maneuvers to and from the southernmost parking stalls along the east face of the proposed building. With a future traffic signal, the site eastbound queues are expected to be reduced significantly, however, they may continue to infrequently and for very brief periods of time, extend beyond the limited storage during the p.m. peak hour. A new access driveway in alignment with the Target service road is proposed to be constructed during the project. The existing driveway on Lexington Avenue that serves Phase I and Phase II is a temporary access point that is scheduled to close. The proposed new access driveway at the southern end of the site is approved as the sole permanent access off of Lexington Avenue. The proposed new access/intersection would include a traffic signal. The proposed traffic signal is included in the Ramsey County Lexington Avenue reconstruction project that is anticipated to start in 2022. The Applicant has also worked with Ramsey County to determine the alignment of the right-turn lane from Lexington Avenue into this site, and have reached an agreement about this alignment. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 7 of 10 The construction of a signal at this intersection would remove the existing full access into Big O Tires and Arby’s site as a new median would be constructed to the south of the new signal, restricting left turn movements. The proposed access in the Big O Tires and Arby’s site would become a south bound right in and right out. The City is generally not in a position to remove access from the Big O Tires and Arby’s site to benefit the proposed development, and because of that, staff requested the Applicant to consider adding an access from Lexington Station third addition into the Big O/Arby’s site. However, the proposed access into the Big O Tires and Arby’s site becomes moot if the County moves forward with the Lexington Avenue project as they have the authority to revoke the full access into the Big O Tires and Arby’s site. The applicant has also identified a cross access point in the southeast corner of the property for potential access to the site to the south. This access is contingent upon a mutual agreement between the property owners. 3.1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 8 of 10 before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Under Section 1355.06 subd.4, an application for an amendment shall be administered in the same manner as required for a new application. Any structural alteration, enlargement or intensification change in site plan, or similar change not specially permitted, shall require City Council action and all procedures shall apply as if a new application were being requested; provided, however, that when such changes are deemed to be insignificant by the Zoning Administrator, the requirements of a public hearing may be waived. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment H) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1. The Lexington Station development located at 3787, 3833 and 3845 Lexington Avenue operates under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was originally approved in 2013. 2. New building construction or site modification identified on the approved Master Plan requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 4. The proposed change to the Master Plan from two buildings to a single building is a significant change to the current Master Plan. 5. A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 6. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 7, 2021. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 9 of 10 x Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-004 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of Lexington Station III at 3787 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the April 7, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. All conditions of the original Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the March 4, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 3. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 5. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 6. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 7. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit floor plans for review by staff. 10. Separate sign permits shall be submitted for all signs on the site. x Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 004 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of Lexington Station III at 3787 Lexington Avenue, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the April 7, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. x Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-004 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of Lexington Station III at 3787 Lexington Avenue, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table of Planning Case 21-004 for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review of Lexington Station III at 3787 Lexington Avenue:a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2021 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2021\21-001 - BSC Bldg 14 Addition - APUD\PC Packets Page 10 of 10 Public Comments Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out on Friday, March 26, 2021. No comments have been received as of the writing of this report. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 4, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by May 3, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Application Narrative B. Location Map C. Approved Master PUD Site Plan D. Site Plans E. Building Elevations F. Monument Sign Plan G. Traffic Study H. Engineering Comment Letter I. Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Plans J. PowerPoint and Project Narrative 236600' 325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 500 Chicago, IL, US 60654 T 312 424 2400 norr.com February 16, 2021 Mike Mrosla Community Development Manager/ City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 6I 0I\MRKXSR7XEXMSRƁ4LEWI--- 0I\MRKXSR%ZIRYI 0SX&PSGO6SFIVXW%HHMXMSRXS%VHIR,MPPW Dear Mr. Mrosla: NORR and Larson Engineering are working on behalf of Kensington Development Partners to manage the development of Phase III of Lexington Station. In 2013, the City approved a Master PUD for the Lexington Station redevelopment project at the southwest corner of Lexington Avenue North and Red Fox Road. The total project area is 7.57 acres in size and is comprised of three separate parcels (3833 and 3771 Lexington Avenue and 1120 Red Fox Road). Phase I of the development was completed in 2013-14 and Phase II was completed in 2017-2018. Phase III, as described in this narrative, will complete the development and secure Lexington Station as a retail destination in Arden Hills. MModifications to the Master PUD Phase III shall consist of the demolition of the existing multi-tenant building and redevelopment of Lot 3, Block 1, of the Roberts Addition to Arden Hills. Kensington Development Partners is seeking modifications to the Master PUD to accommodate a new proposed design of this approximately 4.24-acre site. The existing approved PUD for Phase III depicts (2) separate one-story buildings, one 17,841 SF Retail Anchor and one 15,210 SF Retail/Office building. The proposed plan would consist of a one-story grocery anchor, approximately 43,000 SF, 65% of which is anticipated to be retail sales floor space, with a total of 200 parking spaces. The proposed changes to the parking fields in Phase I and II would increase the total parking of the development to 416 spaces while maintaining access and circulation aisles. During construction of Phase III, the planned new access driveway on Lexington Avenue in alignment with the Target service road will be completed and the existing Lexington Ave driveway would be closed. Cross access is being proposed to the property to the South (Big O Tires and Arby’s). Building Design Kensington Development Partners proposes the construction of a building to match the cohesive design of the existing buildings of Phase I and II developments. The use of similar materials and design features will seek to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The transparency requirements have been considered in the development and met with the use of opaque windows in the anticipated service areas. The non-primary facades will utilize the previously approved rock face CMU, with colors consistent with the brick building material, on the non-primary façade of the retail building in Phase II. Sincerely, David Babnigg Studio Manager T 312 873 1053 M 708 420 3036 | David.Babnigg@norr.com Attachment A Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN Statute 466.03 Subd 21. Location Map Red Fox Road Grey Fox RoadDunlap Street NorthLexington Avenue NorthNorthwoods Drive± §¨¦35W §¨¦694 £¤10 Shoreview Subject Parcel Park and Open Space $WWDFKPHQW% (PHASE #2)PROPOSED ONE STORYRETAIL/OFFICE BUILDING16,922 SFFUTUREPROPOSED ONE STORYANCHOR17,841 SF(PHASE #3)PROPOSED ONE STORYRETAIL/OFFICE BUILDING15,210 SFEXIST. BUILDINGOUTLINETRASHTTRASHTRASH1111112011811101212121112121412181566202020128118111111551312413 TOTAL STALLS11EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING15,340 SF173'-8"100'65'234'65'260'BIKE RACKLARGE PLANTERTYP OF 420' BUILDINGSETBACK LINE20' BUILDINGSETBACK LINE20' BUILDINGSETBACK LINE20' BUILDINGSETBACK LINE24'24'24'24'SPEAKERSPEAKERPROPOSEDMONUMENT SIGNPROPOSEDMONUMENT SIGNEXISTINGMONUMENT SIGNPROPOSEDSIGNALCENTERIDENTIFICATIONSIGNFENCE IN THE EVENTOF A DRIVE-THRUA1.1Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2016901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH0306015SITE SUMMARY:TYPICAL PARKING SPACES SHOWN: TYP STALL = 9' X 18' = 162 SFREQUIRED PARKING PER BUILDINGS: 1 STALL PER 150 SF / RETAILTOTAL BUILDINGS SF / RETAIL: 65,313 SFTOTAL LANDSCAPE COVERAGEGREENSPACE: 65,760 SFTOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 65,313 / 150 = 435 STALLSTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 413 STALLSTotal Parking Lot Area: 157,696 SFTotal Parking Island Green Space Area: 6,767 SFTotal Parking Lot Boundary Green Space: 8,947 SFREQUIRED PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE: 15,797 SFPROVIDED PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE: 15,714 SF Attachment C Phase IPhase IIPhase III Attachment D Attachment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a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a6) ))( & 7& */ % % % & &% 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 5,0 &% % % 5,0 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ ))( 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ & 7& */ 7& */ ))( ))( ))( ))( 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ % % 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7&*/ 7&*/ 7&*/ 7&*/ 7&*/ 7& */ 7& */ 5,0 7& */ % % 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ % & 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */ 7& */&,3: 3 &,3: 3 /(;,1*721$9(18(5&36765&36765&35&35&35&36765&36765&36765&35&36765&3676723:(,5 (6803 1:6803 6725<%5,&.%8,/',1*/(;,1*721$9(60+723 %27720 5&35&30+ % 8 5, ( ' 5&36725<%5,&.%8,/',1*/(;,1*721$9(5&36763(3 5&33(35&36 7 6 5&36763(3676&035&367639&5&36765&36765&3 '7 3 5&339&5&3 5&30+ %85,(' 5&35&36765&3676&5266$&&(6632,17&217,1*(1783210878$/$*5((0(17%(7:((13523(57<2:1(56'HVFULSWLRQ5HY 'DWH/(;,1*72167$7,213+$6(5(')2;52$'$5'(1+,//6016KHHW7LWOH 3URMHFW 'UDZQ%\ &KHFNHG%\ ,VVXH'DWH 7-50-:/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP&/DUVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG3 ?3URMHFWV?3URMHFWV?/H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ3KDVH .HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQW ?&'HVLJQ?'UDZLQJ)LOHV?&*UDGLQJGZJ/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP/DUVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF3URMHFW7LWOH .(16,1*721'(9(/230(173$571(56&200(5&('5,9(68,7(2$.%522.,/&OLHQW 'DWH /LF1R ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQVRUUHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFWVXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\OLFHQVHG3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHUXQGHUWKHODZVRIWKHVWDWHRI0LQQHVRWD35(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,211257+ 6KHHW *5$',1*$1'(526,21&21752/3/$1&352326('&21728560$-25,17(59$/*5$'(%5($./,1(352326('&21728560,125,17(59$/ (;,67,1*&2172856 7& */*5$'(6/23(6327$%%5(9,$7,216 7&7232)&85%*/*877(5/,1(%%,780,1286&&21&5(7((2(0(5*(1&<29(5)/2:7:7232):$//%:%277202):$// )* (;,67,1*72%(9(5,),('6,/7)(1&(5,35$352&.&2167(175$1&(,1/(73527(&7,21&21&5(7(:$6+28767$7,21/(*(1' 2ZQHUDQG&RQWUDFWRUVKDOOREWDLQ03&$13'(6SHUPLW&RQWUDFWRUVKDOOEHUHVSRQVLEOHIRUDOOIHHVSHUWDLQLQJWRWKLVSHUPLW7KH6:333VKDOOEHNHSWRQVLWHDWDOOWLPHV ,QVWDOOWHPSRUDU\HURVLRQFRQWUROPHDVXUHV LQOHWSURWHFWLRQVLOWIHQFHDQGURFNFRQVWUXFWLRQHQWUDQFHV SULRUWREHJLQQLQJDQ\H[FDYDWLRQRUGHPROLWLRQZRUNDWWKHVLWH (URVLRQFRQWUROPHDVXUHVVKRZQRQWKHHURVLRQFRQWUROSODQDUHWKHDEVROXWHPLQLPXP7KHFRQWUDFWRUVKDOOLQVWDOOWHPSRUDU\HDUWKGLNHVVHGLPHQWWUDSVRUEDVLQVDGGLWLRQDOVLOWDWLRQIHQFLQJDQGRUGLVNWKHVRLOSDUDOOHOWRWKHFRQWRXUVDVGHHPHGQHFHVVDU\WRIXUWKHUFRQWUROHURVLRQ$OOFKDQJHVVKDOOEHUHFRUGHGLQWKH6:333 $OOFRQVWUXFWLRQVLWHHQWUDQFHVVKDOOEHVXUIDFHGZLWKFUXVKHGURFNDFURVVWKHHQWLUHZLGWKRIWKHHQWUDQFHDQGIURPWKHHQWUDQFHWRDSRLQW LQWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQ]RQH 7KHWRHRIWKHVLOWIHQFHVKDOOEHWUHQFKHGLQDPLQLPXPRI´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´RIJRRGTXDOLW\WRSVRLODQGVRG $OOFRQVWUXFWLRQVKDOOEHSHUIRUPHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKVWDWHDQGORFDOVWDQGDUGVSHFLILFDWLRQVIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQ 352326('%8,/',1*))( a6)&,3: 3 &,3: 3 /(;,1*721$9(18((;,67,1*%8,/',1*5&36765&36765&35&35&35&36765&36765&36765&35&36765&3676723:(,5 (6803 1:6803 6725<%5,&.%8,/',/(;,1*721$9(60+723 %27720 5&35&30+ % 8 5, ( ' 5&36725<%5,&.%8,/',1*/(;,1*721$9(5&36763(3 5&33(35&36 7 6 5&36763(3676&035&367639&5&36765&36765&3'7 3 5&339&5&3 5&30+ %85,(' 5&35&36765&3676/)',3+<'5$17:*9&225':0(&+670+5,0 ;;;;,19 ,19 16 &225':0(&+/)39�,1/)',3&25(,172(;,676758&785(75(1&+'5$,15,0 ,19 ( ,19 : 670+;;5,0 ;;;;723:(,5 25,),&( ,19 /)5&3#670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 81'(5*5281'),/75$7,216<67(03(5)25$7('3,3(727$/92/80( &)3,3(,19 6721('7,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 670+;;5,0 ;;;;,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ;;;;,19 &%;;5,0 ;;;;,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 &%;;5,0 ,19 5$,1/($'(5&225':0(&+5$,1/($'(5&225':0(&+5$,1/($'(5&225':0(&+/)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3# /)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3# /)5&3# /)5&3#/)5&3# /)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3#/)5&3#5$,1/($'(5&225':0(&+/)39&#&211(&772(;,67,1*:0::(77$3$1'9$/9(&5266$&&(6632,17&217,1*(1783210878$/$*5((0(17%(7:((13523(57<2:1(56'HVFULSWLRQ5HY 'DWH/(;,1*72167$7,213+$6(5(')2;52$'$5'(1+,//6016KHHW7LWOH 3URMHFW 'UDZQ%\ &KHFNHG%\ ,VVXH'DWH 7-50-:/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP&/DUVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG3 ?3URMHFWV?3URMHFWV?/H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ3KDVH .HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQW ?&'HVLJQ?'UDZLQJ)LOHV?&8WLOLW\GZJ/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP/DUVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF3URMHFW7LWOH .(16,1*721'(9(/230(173$571(56&200(5&('5,9(68,7(2$.%522.,/&OLHQW 'DWH /LF1R ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQVRUUHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFWVXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\OLFHQVHG3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHUXQGHUWKHODZVRIWKHVWDWHRI0LQQHVRWD35(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,211257+ 6KHHW 87,/,7<3/$1&&$%/(81'(5*5281'/,1(),%(5237,&81'(5*5281'/,1((/(&75,&81'(5*5281'/,1((/(&75,&29(5+($'/,1(7(/(3+21(81'(5*5281'/,1(672506(:(53,3(6$1,7$5<6(:(53,3(1$785$/*$681'(5*5281'/,1(:$7(50$,13,3(/,*+732/(672500$1+2/()/$5('(1'&85%,1/(7&$7&+%$6,1:$7(56+872))*$7(9$/9( %2;+<'5$176$1,7$5<0$1+2/('5$,17,/(3,3(/(*(1'87,/,7<127(6 ,WLVWKHUHVSRQVLELOLW\RIWKHFRQWUDFWRUWRSHUIRUPRUFRRUGLQDWHDOOQHFHVVDU\XWLOLW\FRQQHFWLRQVDQGUHORFDWLRQVIURPH[LVWLQJXWLOLW\ORFDWLRQVWRWKHSURSRVHGEXLOGLQJDVZHOODVWRDOORQVLWHDPHQLWLHV7KHVHFRQQHFWLRQVLQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWRZDWHUVDQLWDU\VHZHUFDEOH79WHOHSKRQHJDVHOHFWULFVLWHOLJKWLQJHWF $OOVHUYLFHFRQQHFWLRQVVKDOOEHSHUIRUPHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKVWDWHDQGORFDOVWDQGDUGVSHFLILFDWLRQVIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQ8WLOLW\FRQQHFWLRQV VDQLWDU\VHZHUZDWHUPDLQDQGVWRUPVHZHU PD\UHTXLUHDSHUPLWIURPWKH&LW\ 7KHFRQWUDFWRUVKDOOYHULI\WKHHOHYDWLRQVDWSURSRVHGFRQQHFWLRQVWRH[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHVSULRUWRDQ\GHPROLWLRQRUH[FDYDWLRQ 7KHFRQWUDFWRUVKDOOQRWLI\DOODSSURSULDWHHQJLQHHULQJGHSDUWPHQWVDQGXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVKRXUVSULRUWRFRQVWUXFWLRQ$OOQHFHVVDU\SUHFDXWLRQVVKDOOEHPDGHWRDYRLGGDPDJHWRH[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHV 6WRUPVHZHUUHTXLUHVWHVWLQJLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK0LQQHVRWDSOXPELQJFRGH ZKHUHORFDWHGZLWKLQIHHWRIZDWHUOLQHVRUWKHEXLOGLQJ +'3(VWRUPVHZHUSLSLQJVKDOOPHHW$670)DQGILWWLQJVVKDOOPHHW$670'MRLQWSUHVVXUHWHVW,QVWDOODWLRQVKDOOPHHW$670& $OO5&3SLSHVKRZQRQWKHSODQVVKDOOEH01'27FODVV 0DLQWDLQDPLQLPXPRIò RIFRYHURYHUDOOZDWHUOLQHVDQGVDQLWDU\VHZHUOLQHV:KHUHò RIFRYHULVQRWSURYLGHGLQVWDOO´ULJLGSRO\VW\UHQHLQVXODWLRQ 01'27 ZLWKDWKHUPDOUHVLVWDQFHRIDWOHDVWDQGDFRPSUHVVLYHVWUHQJWKRIDWOHDVWSVL,QVXODWLRQVKDOOEH ZLGHFHQWHUHGRYHUSLSHZLWK´VDQGFXVKLRQEHWZHHQSLSHDQGLQVXODWLRQ:KHUHGHSWKLVOHVVWKDQ XVH´RILQVXODWLRQ ,QVWDOOZDWHUOLQHV´DERYHVHZHUV:KHUHWKHVHZHULVOHVVWKDQEHORZWKHZDWHUOLQH RUDERYH LQVWDOOVHZHUSLSLQJRIPDWHULDOVDSSURYHGIRULQVLGHEXLOGLQJXVHIRUIHHWRQHDFKVLGHRIWKHFURVVLQJ $OOZDWHUPDLQSLSLQJVKDOOEHFODVVGXFWLOHLURQSLSHXQOHVVQRWHGRWKHUZLVH 6HH3URMHFW6SHFLILFDWLRQVIRUEHGGLQJUHTXLUHPHQWV 3UHVVXUHWHVWDQGGLVLQIHFWDOOQHZZDWHUPDLQVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKVWDWHDQGORFDOUHTXLUHPHQWV 6DQLWDU\VHZHUSLSLQJVKDOOEH39&6'5IRUGHSWKVOHVVWKDQ 39&6'5IRUGHSWKVEHWZHHQ DQG DQGFODVV',3IRUGHSWKVRI RUPRUH $VWUXFWXUHDGMXVWPHQWVKDOOLQFOXGHUHPRYLQJDQGVDOYDJLQJWKHH[LVWLQJFDVWLQJDVVHPEO\UHPRYLQJH[LVWLQJFRQFUHWHULQJVWRWKHSUHFDVWVHFWLRQ,QVWDOOQHZULQJVDQGVDOYDJHGFDVWLQJWRSURSRVHGJUDGHVFOHDQLQJFDVWLQJIODQJHE\PHFKDQLFDOPHDQVWRLQVXUHDVRXQGVXUIDFHDQGLQVWDOODQH[WHUQDOFKLPQH\VHDOIURPFDVWLQJWRSUHFDVWVHFWLRQ&KLPQH\VHDOVVKDOOEH,QIL6KLHOG8QL%DQGRUDQDSSURYHGHTXDO 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 723 ,19 (;,67,1*/(;,1*721$9(18(60+ 6( ,19 1 6 60+ &% &% 60+ 6: ,19 6( ,19 1 6 60+ 5&36765&36765&35&35&35&36765&36765&36765&35&3676&% &% 1 ,19 : &% 1 ,19 ( &% &% 1: ,19 : ,19 ( &% :( ,19 6( &% 1( ,19 : 5&339&5&30+ %85,(' + %85,( ' 5&35&36765&33(3 5&36765&36765&36$1 '5<12)/2: 6$1 6$1 &,3: 3 &,3: 3 6)352326('%8,/',1* IFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIFIF/,*+7),;785(6&+('8/(),;785(/(77(57<3(),;785(7<3(92/7 +,' /(' 02817,1* /$03 /80(16 :$77$*(&21752/0(',$ /(16/289(5(7& 0$18)$&785(5 6&$7$/2*180%(56 5(0$5.6;&& '(&25$7,9(32/(02817 ;(;,67,1* 07*+7./(' ($&+7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+$$/8&//80$1*7/('.'%6/$32/(67(51%(5*31$127(;%% $5($/,*+7; 32/(./(' ($&+7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+9,%5$7,21'$03(5$7'(*5((6/,7+21,$'6;/('&.70092/7''%;'/,7+21,$32/(666*'0$69'73'%%1$127($$ 12786('%% $5($/,*+7 ; 32/( ./('($&+7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+9,%5$7,21'$03(5$7'(*5((6/,7+21,$'6;/('3.70092/7''%;'/,7+21,$32/(666*'0$69'73'%%25$33529('(48$/127(6%% $5($/,*+7; 32/(./('7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+9,%5$7,21'$03(5/,7+21,$'6;/('3.70092/7''%;'/,7+21,$32/(666*'0 $69'73'%%25$33529('(48$/127(6%% $5($/,*+7 ; 32/( ./('7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+9,%5$7,21'$03(5+286(6,'(6+,(/'/,7+21,$'6;/('3.70092/7+6''%;'/,7+21,$32/(666*'0 $69'73'%%25$33529('(48$/127(6'' :$//02817$5($/,*+7 ; :$// ./('7<3(',675,%87,21'$5.%521=(),1,6+/,7+21,$'6;:&.70092/7''%;'25$33529('(48$/127(6 (;,67,1*32/($1'),;785(5(/2&$7(')5203+$6(6,7(12786('0281721+,*+&21&5(7(%$6(1(:32/($1'),;785( 6 'HVFULSWLRQ5HY 'DWH/(;,1*72167$7,213+$6(5(')2;52$'$5'(1+,//6016KHHW7LWOH 3URMHFW 'UDZQ%\ &KHFNHG%\ ,VVXH'DWH :0(-52/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP&/DUVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG) ?352-(&76?/H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ3KDVH5HYLVHG?&$'?3(GZJ/DERUH5RDG:KLWH%HDU/DNH01 I ZZZODUVRQHQJUFRP3URMHFW7LWOH .(16,1*721'(9(/230(173$571(56&200(5&('5,9(68,7(2$.%522.,/&OLHQW 'DWH /LF1R ,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVSODQVSHFLILFDWLRQVRUUHSRUWZDVSUHSDUHGE\PHRUXQGHUP\GLUHFWVXSHUYLVLRQDQGWKDW,DPDGXO\OLFHQVHG3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHUXQGHUWKHODZVRIWKHVWDWHRI0LQQHVRWD35(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,211257+ 6KHHW 3(6,7(3/$1(/(&75,&$/2) ),1,6+(')/225 %2&$123< 72&08 72678' %2/2:&$123< (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;522)/,1(%(<21')8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7)8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7 (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(4 (4(;(; (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(; (;(;(; (; (;(;(;(;),1,6+(')/225 ),1,6+(')/225 $%2&$123< %2&$123< 72&08 72&08 72678' 72678' %2/2:&$123< %2/2:&$123< (;(;(;(;(;(;)8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7(;(;(;(;(;(;522)/,1(%(<21')8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7%(<21'(;(;(;(;(;(;(;522)/,1(%(<21' &/($57281'(56,'(2)6758&785((; (;(;(;(;&/&/ (;81'(56,'((;81'(56,'('%&(;),1,6+(')/225 %2&$123< 72&08 72678' %2/2:&$123< %2'2&. (;(;522)/,1(%(<21'(;(;(;(;)8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7)8785(0(&+$1,&$/81,7(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;),1,6+(')/225 %2&$123< 72&08 %2/2:&$123< %2'2&. (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;522)/,1(%(<21'(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;'%&&%%8,/',1*0$7(5,$/$5($6)3(5&(17$*(&$676721( (; 6)%5,&. (; 6)&08 (; 6) &08 (; 6)3+(12/,&3$1(/ (;(; 6)6725()5217 6) 0(7$/'2256 6)&$123< 6)727$/ 6)(/(9$7,21)$&$'($5($5(4*/$666)3529,'('*/$666)($6764)7 64)7 64)7 1257+ 64)7 64)7 64)7 72 $%29(*5$'(1/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH&KLFDJR,/86QRUUFRP35(/,0,1$5< 127)25&216758&7,216HDO V 7KLVGUDZLQJVKDOOQRWEHXVHGIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQSXUSRVHVXQWLOWKHVHDODSSHDULQJKHUHRQLVVLJQHGDQGGDWHGE\WKH$UFKLWHFWRU(QJLQHHU 306'/(;,1*72167$7,21 3+$6(,,,)8785(*52&(5<6+(//7KLVGUDZLQJKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH.HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQWDQGWKHUHDUHQRUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVRIDQ\NLQGPDGHE\1255WRDQ\SDUW\ZLWKZKRP1255KDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRDFRQWUDFW(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216/(;,1*72167$7,21$5'(1+,//6011,&+ 1257+(/(9$7,21 ($67(/(9$7,21 6287+(/(9$7,21 :(67(/(9$7,217$* 352'8&7 0$18)$&785(5 02'(/),1,6+ 6,=( &200(176(; 3+(12/,&3$1(/&21&($/(')$67(1(56721(:22'$5&+,7(&785$/3$1(/6 )$6+,21*5(< &% [ (; 3+(12/,&3$1(/&21&($/(')$67(1(56721(:22'$5&+,7(&785$/3$1(/6 *5$3+,7(63(&7580$% [ (; JD*$/9$1,=(' ,0(7&2 /$7,78'(),1,6+ 35(:($7+(5('*$/9$/80($775$6+*$7((1&/2685((; &$17,/(9(5&$123< 0$3(6$5&+,7(&785$/&$123,(6 %21(:+,7(.<1$5(; &$17,/(9(5&$123< 0$3(6$5&+,7(&785$/&$123,(6 6+(5:,1:,//,$06(/(&75,&/,0(*5((1 0$3(6&86720&2/25720$7&+/2&$7,21$6,1'8$&7('$1'$781'(56,'(2)&$123<(; $/80,1806725()5217 .$:1((5 ),1,6+ %/$&.$12',=('(; 3$5$3(7&23,1* ),5(6721( &+$5&2$/(; 63$1'5(/*/$66 ,&'+,*+3(5)250$1&(&2$7,1*6 23$&,&2$7:+,7(35,0$5<(; &/($5*/$66 9,752$5&+,7(&785$/*/$66 62/$5%$1&/($5(; &$123< ),16 0$3(6$5&+,7(&785$/&$123,(6 %/$&..<1$5(; 63/,7)$&(&08 $0&21 :$/187 [[ %851,6+('(; 63/,7)$&(&08 $0&21 %8)).$627$ [[ 52&.)$&((; &$676721( 7%' &5(0( 5811,1*%21'720$7&+3+$6($1''(9(/230(17(; %5,&. %(/'(1 $0+(567%/(1'$ 87,/,7< 5811,1*%21'720$7&+3+$6($1''(9(/230(17(; %5,&. %(/'(1 $0+(567%/(1'$ 87,/,7< 62/,'(5&2856((;7(5,25(/(9$7,210$7(5,$/6*/$663(5&(17$*(6%8,/',1*0$7(5,$/6'$7( ,668(')25 5(9 $WWDFKPHQW( $6'6'6'6'3' - 11"3' - 4"11' - 4"3' - 11"11' - 4"3' - 11"11' - 4"3' - 11"11' - 4"6' - 11"8' - 8"11' - 4"4' - 8"11' - 4"4' - 8"11' - 4"16' - 0"3' - 1"11' - 4"4' - 0"11' - 4"2' - 11 1/4"3' - 11"35' - 9 7/8"3' - 11"23' - 0"3' - 11"1' - 0"4' - 0"18' - 0"3' - 11"23' - 0"3' - 11"54' - 10 3/4"3' - 11"23' - 0"3' - 11"23' - 0"3' - 11"23' - 0"3' - 11"37' - 2 1/8"222' - 0"0' - 7 3/4"28' - 4 1/4"12' - 0"24' - 3 3/4"3' - 4"61' - 4"64' - 8"193' - 11 3/8"1' - 4"6' - 4"3' - 10"8' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 8"3' - 4"5' - 8 1/4"352326('*52&(5<6725(64)73' - 11"26' - 11 1/8"3' - 11"26' - 11 1/8"3' - 11"5' - 8 1/2"14' - 0"5' - 8 1/2"3' - 11"25' - 11 1/4"3' - 11"25' - 11 1/4"3' - 11"25' - 11 1/4"3' - 11"25' - 11 1/4"3' - 11"4' - 0"16' - 0"'%&20' - 7 1/4"19' - 0"&%14' - 0"1' - 8 3/8"10' - 0"10' - 0"1' - 0"),5(5,6(5522010' - 0"7' - 1"194' - 0"10' - 0"70' - 8"70' - 8"70' - 8"13' - 4 1/4"27' - 5"0' - 8"1/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH&KLFDJR,/86QRUUFRP35(/,0,1$5< 127)25&216758&7,216HDO V 7KLVGUDZLQJVKDOOQRWEHXVHGIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQSXUSRVHVXQWLOWKHVHDODSSHDULQJKHUHRQLVVLJQHGDQGGDWHGE\WKH$UFKLWHFWRU(QJLQHHU 306'/(;,1*72167$7,21 3+$6(,,,)8785(*52&(5<6+(//7KLVGUDZLQJKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH.HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQWDQGWKHUHDUHQRUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVRIDQ\NLQGPDGHE\1255WRDQ\SDUW\ZLWKZKRP1255KDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRDFRQWUDFW&21&(373/$1/(;,1*72167$7,21$5'(1+,//6011,&+ )/2253/$1'$7( ,668(')25 5(9 ),1,6+(')/225 $%2&$123< 72&08 72678' %2/2:&$123< '%&),1,6+(')/225 %2&$123< 72&08 72678' %2/2:&$123< 1/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH&KLFDJR,/86QRUUFRP35(/,0,1$5< 127)25&216758&7,216HDO V 7KLVGUDZLQJVKDOOQRWEHXVHGIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQSXUSRVHVXQWLOWKHVHDODSSHDULQJKHUHRQLVVLJQHGDQGGDWHGE\WKH$UFKLWHFWRU(QJLQHHU 306'/(;,1*72167$7,21 3+$6(,,,)8785(*52&(5<6+(//7KLVGUDZLQJKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH.HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQWDQGWKHUHDUHQRUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVRIDQ\NLQGPDGHE\1255WRDQ\SDUW\ZLWKZKRP1255KDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRDFRQWUDFW0$7(5,$/%2$5'/(;,1*72167$7,21$5'(1+,//6011,&+ ($67(/(9$7,21 1257+(/(9$7,216721(:22'3+(12/,&3$1(/6*5$3+,7(63(&7580 (; %$6('2))[*5,'%(/'(1$0+(567%/(1'$ (; 87,/,7<%5,&.81'(56,'(2)$:1,1*6+(5:,1:,//,$066: (/(&75,&/,0( (; 0$3(6$5&+,7(&785$/&$123<:+,7(.<1$5 (; $0&21 %8)).$627$ (; 63$1'5(/*/$66:+,7( (; $0&21:$/187 (; 6721(:22'3+(12/,&3$1(/6)$6+,21*5(< (; %$6('2))[*5,'&$676721(&5(0( (; &$676721(&5(0( (; '$7( ,668(')25 5(9 1/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH&KLFDJR,/86QRUUFRP35(/,0,1$5< 127)25&216758&7,216HDO V 7KLVGUDZLQJVKDOOQRWEHXVHGIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQSXUSRVHVXQWLOWKHVHDODSSHDULQJKHUHRQLVVLJQHGDQGGDWHGE\WKH$UFKLWHFWRU(QJLQHHU 306'/(;,1*72167$7,21 3+$6(,,,)8785(*52&(5<6+(//7KLVGUDZLQJKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH.HQVLQJWRQ'HYHORSPHQWDQGWKHUHDUHQRUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVRIDQ\NLQGPDGHE\1255WRDQ\SDUW\ZLWKZKRP1255KDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRDFRQWUDFW(;7(5,253(56(3&7,9(/(;,1*72167$7,21$5'(1+,//6011,&+1257+($673(563(&7,9(6287+($673(563(&7,9('$7( ,668(')25 5(9 8786 W. 35W Service DriveBlaine, MN 55449763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.comKensington DevelopmentLexington StationContactKensington Development PartnersAttn: Dan Rea700 Commerce DriveSuite 130Oak Brook, IL 60523Jobsite3833 Lexington Ave NorthArden Hills, MN 55126Phone 630-664-2279SalespersonRFDesignPWDate12-10-20 Attachment F Kensington Development - Lexington Station8786 W. 35W Service DriveBlaine, MN 55449763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.comCustomer Approval DateThis drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc.It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent ofSpectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing for the purposeof constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems,Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign SystemsInc., will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence.FUTUREGROCERFUTURETENANT Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Fax: 1.866.440.6364 An Equal Opportunity Employer SRF No. 14005.00 To: Daniel Rea, Director of Development Services Kensington Development Partners From: Jeff Bednar, TOPS, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist Brent Clark, PE, Senior Engineer Date: February 26, 2021 Subject: Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study Introduction SRF has completed a traffic study for the proposed Lexington Station Phase 3 development, which is located in the northwest quadrant of the Lexington Avenue and Target Road intersection in the City of Arden Hills (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of the study are to review existing operations within the study area, identify any transportation impacts both externally and internally to the site, and recommend improvements to address any issues, if necessary. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and study recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions Existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline and identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. Evaluation of the existing conditions includes a review of traffic volumes, roadway characteristics, and an intersection capacity analysis, which are summarized in the following sections. Traffic Volumes Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak period vehicular turning movement and pedestrian/bicyclist counts were collected by SRF during the week of November 17, 2020 at the following study intersections: x Lexington Avenue and Red Fox Road x Lexington Avenue and Existing Site Access x Lexington Avenue and Target Road x Lexington Avenue and Arby’s/Big O Tires Access x Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road x Red Fox Road and Lexington Station West Access x Red Fox Road and Lexington Station East Access Historical average daily traffic (ADT) volumes were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for the study area. $WWDFKPHQW* February1 3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJB3URMHFW/RFDWLRQFGU/H[LQJWRQ$YH*UH\)R[5G 5HG)R[5G &RXQW\5G( 3URMHFW /RFDWLRQ 7DUJHW5G$FFHVV 7DUJHW /H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 3 Note that data collection efforts were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and traffic volumes were estimated to be approximately 20 to 30 percent lower than normal conditions for the study area. Therefore, the newly collected turning movements were adjusted to reflect non-COVID conditions by using a combination of recently collected ADT volumes in the study area between 2016 and 2019 and turning movement counts collected/developed as part of the Lexington Station Traffic Study completed by SRF in May 2013. Roadway Characteristics A field assessment was completed to identify various roadway characteristics within the transportation system study area, such as functional classification, general configuration, and posted speed limit. A summary of these roadway characteristics is shown in Table 1. Note that these are general characteristics and that there are some deviations within portions of roadway segments. For example, Red Fox Road is a two-lane undivided roadway that transitions into a three-lane undivided roadway with a continuous center two-way left-turn lane east of Lexington Avenue. Table 1. Existing Roadway Characteristics (1) Functional Classification based on MnDOT’s Functional Classification GIS. (2) Red Fox Road transitions from a two-lane undivided roadway to a 3-lane undivided roadway with a continuous center two-way left-turn lane east of Lexington Avenue. From a traffic control perspective, the Lexington Avenue/Red Fox Road and Lexington Avenue/Grey Fox Road intersections are signalized, while the five other study intersections are unsignalized with side-street stop control. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes in the study area are shown in Figure 2. Intersection Operations Analysis An operations analysis was conducted to determine how traffic is currently operating at the study intersections. All intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle results from SimTraffic, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 2. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Roadway Functional Classification (1) General Configuration Posted Speed Limit (mph) Lexington Avenue Minor Arterial 5-lane undivided 40 Red Fox Road Local Road 2-lane undivided/3-lane undivided (2) 30 Target Road Local Road 2-lane divided/2-lane undivided N/A Grey Fox Road Local Road 2-lane undivided 30 February1 ([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH /H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJB([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQVFGU/H[LQJWRQ$YH*UH\)R[5G 5HG)R[5G 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH 5HG)R[5G (DVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G :HVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH ([LVWLQJ6LWH$FFHVV /H[LQJWRQ$YH 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH %LJ27LUHV$UE\¶V $FFHVV /H[LQJWRQ$YH *UH\)R[5G 3URMHFW /RFDWLRQ ;; ;; $03HDN+RXU9ROXPH 303HDN+RXU9ROXPH 6LGH6WUHHW6WRS&RQWURO 6LJQDOL]HG&RQWURO /(*(1' 7DUJHW Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 5 Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 C > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 F > 80 > 50 For side-street stop-controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This considers the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hours. Results of the existing operations analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that all study intersections operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the existing traffic control, geometric layout, and signal timing. Table 3. Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Lexington Avenue / Red Fox Road B 11 sec D 37 sec Lexington Avenue / Existing Site Access (1) A/A 5 sec A/C 18 sec Lexington Avenue / Target Road (1) A/A 8 sec AA/FF 553 ssec Lexington Avenue / Arby’s & Big 0 Tire’s (1) A/B 11 sec A/C 23 sec Lexington Avenue / Grey Fox Road A 6 sec B 11 sec Red Fox Road / Lexington Station West Access (1) A/A 5 sec A/A 4 sec Red Fox Road / Lexington Station East Access (1) A/A 7 sec A/A 9 sec (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach delay. Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 6 The following information summarizes the operational and/or queueing issues identified as part of the existing capacity analysis: x Lexington Avenue/Red Fox Road: o Southbound left-turn queues extend beyond turn lane storage and into the Lexington Avenue/ I-694 South Ramp intersection approximately 25 percent of the p.m. peak hour. These queues cause friction over the I-694 bridge, as the left-turn queues restrict the thru volume along Lexington Avenue to one (1) lane. o Eastbound left-turn queues extend beyond the Lexington Station east site access approximately 15 percent of the p.m. peak hour. o Westbound right-turn queues extend beyond turn lane storage approximately 25 percent of the p.m. peak hour. x Lexington Avenue/Target Road o The westbound approach operates at LOS F (53 seconds) with a 95th percentile queue of approximately 200 feet (i.e. eight (8) to ten (10) vehicles) during the p.m. peak hour. Planned Transportation Improvements Ramsey County has programmed a reconstruction project for Lexington Avenue from County Road E to I-694. The reconstruction project includes replacing aging and deteriorating pavement, replacing traffic signals, and improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities. As part of the reconstruction project, Lexington Avenue will be converted from a 5-lane undivided roadway to a 4- lane divided roadway with left- and right-turn lanes. Dual southbound left-turn lanes and an eastbound right-turn lane are planned to be constructed at the Lexington Avenue/Red Fox Road intersection, which are expected to mitigate existing queuing issues at the intersection. In addition, access management strategies will be implemented along the corridor. The Lexington Station access on Lexington Avenue is expected to be closed, and the Arby’s/Big O Tire’s access will be limited to a right-in/right-out. In order to provide access to these existing developments, the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection will be reconstructed to provide a west leg. The reconstruction project is expected to be completed by 2023, therefore, for the purpose of this study, the reconstruction project was assumed under year 2023 no build and build conditions. Note that the reconstructed Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection is being designed for future traffic signal control, however, the timing of this traffic control improvement is unknown at this time. Since the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection is the primary access to the development, the roadway network was evaluated with and without traffic signal control at this study intersection. Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 7 Year 2023 No Build Conditions To understand how the planned transportation improvements and general background growth are expected to impact the study intersections, year 2023 no build conditions were reviewed. Note that the year 2023 represents one-year post construction of the proposed development and includes the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project. GGeneral Background Growth To account for general background growth in the area, an annual growth rate of one-half percent was applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes to develop year 2023 background traffic forecasts. This growth rate is consistent with future traffic volume projections identified in the City of Arden Hills – 2040 Comprehensive Plan and with historical growth in the study area based on MnDOT AADT volumes. Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate the year 2023 no build traffic volumes, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic Software. Year 2023 no build traffic forecasts, which include general background growth and the planned transportation improvements, are shown in Figure 3. As mentioned previously, the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project was assumed, and signal timing was optimized. Due to the unknown timing of traffic control improvements at the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection, the intersection was analyzed with and without a traffic signal. Note this access is expected to be one of the primary access locations to the proposed development. Results of the year 2023 no build intersection capacity analysis, shown in Table 4, indicate that all intersections are expected to operate at a LOS C or better during peak hours. With the reconstruction project, the Lexington Avenue/Red Fox Road intersection is expected to improve from an overall LOS D to a LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. In addition, queueing on all approaches of the intersection are expected to be reduced, and the maximum southbound left-turn queue not expected to extend beyond the proposed dual-lane storage. Without a traffic signal, the west leg addition and general background traffic are expected to increase side-street delays at the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection by approximately eight (8) seconds. February1 1R%XLOG&RQGLWLRQV /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH /H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJB1R%XLOG&RQGLWLRQVFGU/H[LQJWRQ$YH*UH\)R[5G 5HG)R[5G 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH 5HG)R[5G (DVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G :HVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH %LJ27LUHV$UE\¶V $FFHVV /H[LQJWRQ$YH *UH\)R[5G ;; ;; $03HDN+RXU9ROXPH 303HDN+RXU9ROXPH 6LGH6WUHHW6WRS&RQWURO 6LJQDOL]HG&RQWURO /(*(1' 3URMHFW /RFDWLRQ %LJ27LUHV$UE\¶V$FFHVV 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G ([WHQVLRQ /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ$FFHVV7DUJHW 6666666666666666666666666666666666WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWDDDDDDDDDDDDDDWDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDWWWWDDDDDDDDDWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW ////////////////////////////RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ %LJ%LJ%LJ%LJ%2777272772727272727272272222222JJUHVUHVLUHVLUHVUHVVUHVUHVUHH$UE$UE$UE$UEUE$UE$U$U$\¶\¶\¶\\¶\\\\\VVVVH$FFHH$FFH$FFH$FFH$FVVVVVVVVVVVVV$$$$ 7777777777777DDUJHDUJHUJHDDUJHDWWWJJ777 $FFH$FFH$FFH$FFFHVV5VV5VV 55555VV55VV5VV 55555VVVV5VV5555V5555GGGG ([WH([WH([WH([WH([WH([WH[WHQVLRQVLVLQVLRRRRRRQVLRVLQVLRQVLRRRRQRRRRRQQQQ /H[LL[LLL/H[L/H[L/HQJWRQJWRRQJWRQJWRQJWRQJWRJQQQQQ6WWWW6W6WQ6WQ6WQQ6Q6QDWLRDWLRDWDWLDWLDDQQJJJJJ$FFH$FFH$FFH$FFH$FFHFFH$FFH$FF$FFHFVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 9 Table 4. 2023 No Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection LOS (Delay) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour No Signal Signal No Signal Signal Lexington Avenue / Red Fox Road A (8 sec) A (8 sec) C (21 sec) C (21 sec) Lexington Avenue / Target Road (1) A/B (12 sec) A (3 sec) AA/F (60 sec) A (6 sec) Lexington Avenue / Arby’s / Big 0 Tire’s (1)(2) A/A (6 sec) A/A (6 sec) A/A (6 sec) A/A (6 sec) Lexington Avenue / Grey Fox Road A (5 sec) A (5 sec) B (11 sec) B (11 sec) Red Fox Road / Lexington Station West Access (1) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) Red Fox Road / Lexington Station East Access (1) A/A (6 sec) A/A (6 sec) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach delay. (2) Right-in/right-out access. Proposed Development The proposed development, shown in Figure 4, includes construction of a 43,000 square foot grocery store and is located in the northwest quadrant of the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection. The development would replace the existing building on-site, which was vacant during data collection efforts. The proposed development is expected to be fully constructed by year 2022. As mentioned previously, Lexington Avenue is expected to be reconstructed independent of the proposed development. As part of the roadway reconstruction project, the existing Lexington Avenue/Lexington Station Access is expected to be closed, and a west leg is expected to be added to the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection. Therefore, access to the proposed development will be provided at the newly constructed Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection, as well as the two existing Red Fox Road/Lexington Station access locations. Year 2023 Build Condition To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts for year 2023 conditions (i.e. one-year after opening) were developed. The year 2023 conditions consider general background growth and traffic generated by the proposed development. The following sections provide detail on the proposed development trip generation, intersection capacity analysis, and potential improvements, including traffic signal warrant analysis. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours and a daily basis were developed. The trip generation estimates, shown in Table 5, were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Note that no pass-by reductions were applied to provide a conservative estimate. February1 6LWH3ODQ /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJ4B6LWH3ODQFGU/H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ &URVV$FFHVV&RQWLQJHQWRQ 3URSHUW\2ZQHUV$JUHHPHQW Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 11 Table 5. Trip Generation Estimates Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily Trips In Out In Out Supermarket (850) 43,000 sf 99 66 203 195 4,592 The assumed land use of supermarket was based on information provided by the developer. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate that the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 165 a.m. peak hour, 398 p.m. peak hour and 4,592 daily trips. Trips generated were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 5, which was developed based on existing travel patterns and engineering judgement. The resultant year 2023 traffic forecasts, which include general background growth and trips generated by the development, are shown in Figure 6. Intersection Operations Analysis To understand how the adjacent roadway network is expected to operate under year 2023 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Similar to 2023 no build conditions, the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project was assumed, signal timing was optimized, and the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection was evaluated with and without a traffic signal. Results of the year 2023 build intersection capacity analysis, shown in Table 6, indicates that the operational issues identified at the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection under the existing and year 2023 no build conditions are expected to increase as development occurs. Given the level of adjacent development planned, construction of the proposed development is expected to accelerate the need for traffic control signal at the study intersection. Table 6. 2023 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection LOS (Delay) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour No Signal Signal No Signal Signal Lexington Avenue / Red Fox Road A (9 sec) A (9 sec) C (23 sec) C (23 sec) Lexington Avenue / Target Road (1) A/B (12 sec) A (4 sec) DD/F (>3 min) A (8 sec) Lexington Avenue / Arby’s / Big 0 Tire’s (1)(2) A/A (5 sec) A/A (5 sec) A/A (6 sec) A/A (6 sec) Lexington Avenue / Grey Fox Road A (5 sec) A (5 sec) B (11 sec) B (11 sec) Red Fox Road / West Site Access (1) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) A/A (4 sec) Red Fox Road / East Site Access (1) A/A (11 sec) A/A (11 sec) A/A (9 sec) A/A (9 sec) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach delay. (2) Right-in/right-out access. February1 'LUHFWLRQDO'LVWULEXWLRQ /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJ5BDirectional DistributionFGU/H[LQJWRQ$YH*UH\)R[5G 5HG)R[5G 7DUJHW5G$FFHVV /H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ February1 %XLOG&RQGLWLRQV /H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ7UDIILF6WXG\ Kensington Development Partners | &LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOV )LJXUH /H[LQJWRQ 6WDWLRQ1257+1RUWK+ ?3URMHFWV???7UDII6WXG\?)LJXUHV?)LJB%XLOG&RQGLWLRQVFGU/H[LQJWRQ$YH*UH\)R[5G 5HG)R[5G 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH 5HG)R[5G (DVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G :HVW6LWH$FFHVV 5HG)R[5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G /H[LQJWRQ$YH *UH\)R[5G ;; ;; $03HDN+RXU9ROXPH 303HDN+RXU9ROXPH 6LGH6WUHHW6WRS&RQWURO 6LJQDOL]HG&RQWURO /(*(1' /H[LQJWRQ$YH %LJ27LUHV$UE\¶V $FFHVV 7DUJHW %LJ27LUHV$UE\¶V$FFHVV7DUJHW$FFHVV5G ([WHQVLRQ/H[LQJWRQ6WDWLRQ$FFHVV 7DUJHW$FFHVV5G ([WHQVLRQ Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 14 The following information summarizes the operational issues that warrant consideration as development occurs: x Lexington Avenue/Target Road/Proposed Development Access: o Without a future traffic signal, the cross-street approaches (including the one providing outbound movement from the proposed development) is expected to be over capacity, with side-street stop delays greater than three (3) minutes and very significant queuing spillback. o The proposed eastbound approach vehicle queuing storage is limited (approximately 100 feet). Infrequently, when this storage is filled, queues are expected to extend into the parking lot, which may infrequently and for very brief periods of time, block parking maneuvers to and from the southernmost parking stalls along the east face of the building. o Note that with a future traffic signal, eastbound queues are expected to be reduced significantly, however, they may continue to infrequently and for very brief periods of time, extend beyond the limited storage during the p.m. peak hour. Warrant Analysis Based on the existing and future capacity issues at the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection, a cursory warrant analysis was performed under 2023 no build and 2023 build conditions to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Results of the warrant analysis indicate that a peak hour warrant is expected to be met under both the 2023 no build and build conditions. It should be noted that due to the difficulty of the movement, the westbound left-turn volumes are likely less than the demand. Therefore, while only the peak hour warrant is met under 2023 conditions, if the demand at the intersection was realized, the intersection may meet additional warrants (i.e. four-hour/eight-hour). In addition, three-minute side-street stop delays are considered unacceptable and may cause safety issues at the intersection, therefore, a traffic signal is recommended as part of the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project to facilitate the access management strategy along the corridor. Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 15 Site Plan Review A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements with regard to access, circulation, and parking. In general, the following should be considered when designing internal traffic controls and roadways: x Incorporate traffic controls, signing, and striping based on guidelines established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) x Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. As mentioned previously, the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels with a traffic signal. The base site plan was intended to be proposed without the Arby’s/Big O Tire’s site cross-property access, however, (see Figure 4) the cross-property access is currently shown to be provided. Note that this cross-property access concept is being considered in order to provide better access to the Arby’s/Big O Tire’s site since that site’s access to Lexington Avenue will be restricted to a right- in/right-out only as part of the Lexington Avenue Improvement Project. This cross-property access is contingent on an agreement between the property owners of the Arby’s/Big O Tire’s site and the proposed development site. It should be further noted that at this time, this cross-property access agreement has not been approved. If there is not sufficient desire from the Arbys/Big O Tire’s property owner for the cross-property access, it will not be constructed. Summary The following information provides a summary of the analysis performed as part of the Lexington Station Traffic Study: x Results of the existing operations analysis indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Queuing issues were identified during the p.m. peak hour at the southbound approach of the Lexington Avenue/Red Fox intersection. In addition, the Target Road operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. x Ramsey County is planning to reconstruct Lexington Avenue from County Road E to I-694 by year 2023. Therefore, these improvements were assumed in the year 2023 no build and build conditions. Note that the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection was evaluated with and without a future traffic signal. x Results of the year 2023 no build operations analysis indicate that Lexington Avenue/Red Fox Road intersection is expected to have improved operations and queuing as a result of the County’s reconstruction project. x The current development proposal consists of a 43,000-square foot grocery store. The development is expected to be fully constructed by year 2022. Access to the proposed Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study February 26, 2021 Page 16 development will be provided at the newly constructed Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection, as well as the two existing Red Fox Road/Lexington Station access locations. x The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 165 a.m. peak hour, 398 p.m. peak hour, and 4,592 daily site trips. x Results of the year 2023 build operations analysis indicate the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection cross-street approach movements are expected to have significant queuing and delay as an unsignalized intersection. The proposed eastbound approach vehicle queuing storage is limited (approximately 100 feet). Infrequently, when this storage is filled, queues are expected to extend into the parking lot, which may infrequently and for very brief periods of time, block parking maneuvers to and from the southernmost parking stalls along the east face of the proposed building. With a future traffic signal, the site eastbound queues are expected to be reduced significantly, however, they may continue to infrequently and for very brief periods of time, extend beyond the limited storage during the p.m. peak hour. x A cursory warrant analysis was performed at the intersection under 2023 no build and build conditions to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Results of the analysis indicate that the intersection would be expected to meet the peak hour warrant. Additionally, due to the constrained westbound left-turn capacity of the intersection under existing conditions, if the latent demand at the intersection was realized, the intersection may meet additional warrants (i.e. four-hour/eight-hour). x The following improvement recommendations and considerations were identified: o Construct a traffic signal at the Lexington Avenue/Target Road intersection as part of the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project. Should the Lexington Avenue reconstruction project not go forward, consideration should be given to installation of a temporary traffic signal at this location. H:\Projects\14000\14005\TraffStudy\Reports\14005_Lexington_Station_P-3_TS_210226.docx Z 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 ZHRGREEN.COM March 4, 2021 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Lexington Station Phase III Development - Engineering Plan Review Comments Dear David, An engineering plan review has been performed on the 2021 Land Use Application, signed Feb. 15, 2021 for the Lexington Station – Phase III Development. A summary of the review comments follows: LAND USE APPLICATION 1. Application notes 4.23 ac. Plans show 4.24 ac. Confirm correct size and correct. NOOR LETTER 2. Proposed development is increasing building size by approximately 30%. 3. A total of 200 parking stalls are noted. This appears to be missing a bank of stall on the plans. Confirm final number. 4. Total Development parking is noted to increase to 416. What was the original approval for parking? LOCATION MAP (Attachment B) 5. Add a north arrow for orientation. SURVEY 6. Confirm all easements on the site have been identified and included. 7. Gross area is listed as 4.24 ac. Application shows 4.23 ac. PLAN SHEETS C100 – DEMOLITION PLAN 8. Add a legend to the plan 9. Identify items noted in the demolition notes: Attachment H David Swearingen March 4, 2021 2 a. What appurtenances are being removed? b. What tree is being removed? c. Where is decorative light being removed? d. Where is monument sign to be removed? e. How are utilities being disconnected, capped, removed, etc.? 10. Demolition is shown outside property lines. Even with common ownership, provide written authorization for work on private property outside property limits. 11. No work for demolishing the existing pond is shown. 12. Are existing drainage pipes along southern boarder being removed? C200 – PAVING PLAN 13. Items missing a. Paving sections and details b. Signing and striping information and details c. ADA parking stall details d. Legend 14. Is 200 stall count correct, or is it missing the 8 in the NE corner of the property? 15. What is Minimum Lot Area referring to in the table? 16. Is the sidewalk being extended? Needs to be shown, detailed, etc. 17. Access to the south is not approved/obtained. Work outside property is shown and connection is designed and planed for construction. Written approval should be obtained prior to design. C300 – GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 18. Need details for: a. Washout station b. Construction entrance c. Silt fence d. Inlet protection e. Etc. for items shown on plan 19. No proposed contours are shown. 20. Where is SWPPP and note specific requirements. C400 – UTILITY PLAN 21. Utility notes need more information. a. City/CEAM and County standards need to be included and/or referenced. b. Identify invert elevations at connections. c. No HDPE pipe is shown on plan. Why have this note? d. Identify locations where less than 7 ½’ of cover over water lines is anticipated. David Swearingen March 4, 2021 3 e. Identify and detail water line conflict locations. f. Need pipe bedding details/section. 22. Provide certification that Water, sewer and storm meet city Comprehensive plan requirements. 23. Identify development change and total water demand and certify adequate supply. 24. What are sanitary sewer discharge rates and volumes? 25. Rim elevations and structure numbers are missing. 26. What are rain leader pipe sizes and materials? 27. Are leader connections wye connections? 28. What are the circle and square located on the underground filtration system? 29. What is the underground filtrations system details and designs? 30. What is filtration system outlet structure? Need design and details. 31. What are the underground filtration system pipe connections, types and details? 32. Detail water and sanitary connections 33. Detail waterline angle points, valves, etc. 34. Detail potential water line and other utility conflict. Provide elevation, and clearance details. 35. Detail hydrant locations. 36. Cross access point is contingent on property agreements. Should have agreement in place prior to plan approval or have alternate design at connection point. L1 – TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 37. Is sidewalk extended along Lexington? 38. Fix font issues in Notes section. L2 – TREE MITIGATION PLAN 39. General note – fonts seem to have issues throughout the sheet. L3 – PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 40. In NE corner, confirm storm sewer easement and tree is outside the easement. 41. Trees planted in medians in NE corner are above storm sewer lines. Are these public or private pipes for maintenance? 42. Parking lot median tree just north of entrance is planted within underground filtration system limits. 43. Cross access shown but not approved. L4 – LANDSCAPE DETAILS 44. No comments David Swearingen March 4, 2021 4 PE1 – SITE PLAN – ELECTRICAL 45. Light levels shown. Certify they meet any City requirements. 46. No pole base or electrical details. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS by LARSON ENGINEERING 47. No detailed review was performed on the hydrocad model results. 48. Page 3 calls for an underground filtration system. No details or drawings are provided in the plans. 49. Include maintenance plan for underground system 50. Proposed 100-year runoff exceeds 7.31” (ATLAS 14) in City checklist 51. New/reconstructed impervious area is shown as 164,464 SF in the report summary, but shown as 184,964 in calculations. 52. Water quality volume and details are not shown on plans SPECTRUM SIGN PLANS 53. Sign plans were not reviewed for engineering. NOOR BUILDING PLANS 54. Building plans were not reviewed for engineering. Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Lexington Station – Phase III plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director AttachPHnt, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 2020 LAND USE AMENDMENT3787 Lexington AvenueArden Hills, MNConcept Plan Review Attachment J 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMAbout Kensington Development PartnersKensington Development Partners acquires, develops and redevelops retail and mixed-use projects throughout the United States. 70+years of collective industry experience has afforded ongoing strategic and valued relationships with national retailers, local municipalities,brokers, lenders and investors, all on a repeat basis. The Principals’ vast experience, creative approach and long history of workingtogether as a team separates Kensington from the rest of the competition because they have the ability to understand and solve thecomplexities that often arise in the development process. Kensington’s full service, in-house development expertise allows us to provideour clients with the skills necessary to make confident and accurate real estate decisions during the site selection, entitlement, andconstruction process to help maximize their performance.The Kensington team is comprised of resourceful and driven veterans that have the relationships and market knowledge to identifycaptivating development and redevelopment opportunities and the expertise to execute on them. To date, Kensington’s founders havedeveloped over 65 projects totaling more than 7 million square feet of property. Each project is regarded as a partnership with our clientsand we promote a working environment in which communicationand service are essential.A commitment to excellence, creativity, leadership, and the cultivating of relationships has been and will remain a hallmark of eachPrincipal as they move forward at Kensington Development Partners.2 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMJay Eck, Principal at Kensington Development Partners, has built an enviable reputation as a leader in retail development in the Midwest over the last 30 years. He has persevered throughmultiple economic cycles, remaining at the forefront of retail trends and leading to completion numerous multi-faceted, groundbreaking developments totaling more than 10 millionsquare feet. Eck coordinates development projects from conception through completion, negotiating purchase agreements with land sellers and leases with the tenants. Eck’s vastexperience and creative approach to understanding and solving the complexities that often arise in the development process were a driving force behind his development success over theyears. His creative approachandextensive experience will help the developmentteam understandand solve the complexities thatwill arise from the project.Chad Jones,Principal at Kensington Development Partners, is a CPA and had previously been the Chief Financial Officer of Bradford Real Estate for over 10 years while working in thefinance and real estate industries for 20 years.ௗJones procures all joint venture, banking, and investor relationships for Kensington.ௗHe has extensive experience with municipalௗincentiveagreements, lease negotiation, entitlements, property managementௗand contract negotiation.ௗJonesௗhas a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting and a Master’s Degreeௗin Real Estate Law.Jones will runall financialmodels andsecure all requiredfinancingfor the developmentandwill be the main point of contact for any incentive agreements with the Village.John Schoditsch,Principal at Kensington Development Partners, brings over 20 years of commercial real estate experience to the Company.ௗPrior to his development career he was a FirstVice President at CB Richard Ellis, and in his last year of brokerage was named 2004 Retail Broker of the Year Finalist. After a successful tenure at CB Richard Ellis, Schoditsch became apartner at Bradford Real Estate and partnered with Eck to procure the majority of Bradford Real Estate’s development deals over the last 13 years. Schoditsch has an exceptional reputationwithin the brokerage and retail community and has used hisௗmany years of experience to cultivateௗthose strongௗrelationships with brokers, retailers and municipalities to help procure andmaintain a vital development pipeline. Heௗhas a vast amount of experience in site selection, deal procurement, contract and lease negotiation, and entitlements.ௗௗOver the last 20 years,Schoditsch has worked with the majority of expanding retailers that have entered the Chicagoland area, including, Mariano’s, LA Fitness, Kohl’s, Cooper’s Hawk, Flix Brewhouse, Starbucks,Chase Bank, PNC Bank, Portillo’s, Art Van, Goodyear, Walgreens, CVS, McDonald’s, Raising Cane’s, Aldi, Noodles and Co. and Panera. Schoditsch will use his development and marketingexpertise to secure the properend users for thedevelopment.Experience and QualificationsOf Individual Team Personnel3 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMFinancial Equity Partner - IM PropertiesKensington Development Partners and IM Properties have formeda partnership that combines Kensington’s vast experience incommercial real estate development with IM’s substantial cashresources and entrepreneurial spirit. With IM’s portfolio currentlyvalued in excess of One Billion Dollars, the partnership has accessto substantial cash resources from internal funds enabling themto maximize the potential of a wide range of exciting commercialdevelopment opportunities. The partnership between Kensingtonand IM Properties has seen the principals of both companieswork together to deliver over 1,850,000 square feet of ground updevelopment since 2009, an investment of over $550M. Withtheir substantial cash resources, entrepreneurial structure, andstrong relationships, Kensington and IM Properties can maximizetheir potential to develop, acquire, or invest in a wide range ofexcitingcommercial real estate opportunities.4 2. Project TeamKensington Development PartnersOverall Team Leader, Leasing, Zoning & Entitlements, Construction Manager, Marketing, Budgeting & Financing700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMIM PropertiesFinancial Equity PartnerLegal CounselBecker GurianEngineerWoolpertProduction ArchitectsNorr5 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM3. Organizational Chart – Ownership StructureOwnerJoint Venture Kensington/ IM Properties (Single Purpose LLC to be formed)50%Kensington Development Partners Inc. (Developer)James EckJohn SchoditschChad Jones50%IM Properties PLC(Equity)Lord Robert Edmiston6 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMPrincipals’ Development History65 PROJECTS - OVER 7 MILLION SF7Year Completed Center Name Address City State Intersection SF Description/Anchor2020 * Oakridge Court Algonquin IL NWC Randall Rd & Becky Lynn Lane 20,442 Aldi2020 * Sawmill Station * 6763 Dempster St Morton Grove IL SEC Dempster St & Waukegan Rd 310,000LA Fitness, Flix Brewhouse, Kohl's, Coopers Hawk Winery & Restaurant, Dollar Tree, Ross, Grocery Store, 240 Apartment Units2020 * Market Centre * 6200 S Cass Ave Westmont IL NWC 63rd St & Cass Ave 110,000 LA Fitness Signature Club, Starbucks, Small Shop Retail,Cinema/Retail 2020 Schaumburg Corners Schaumburg IL NEC Golf Rd & Roselle Rd 160,290Bob's Discount Furniture, Office Depot, Petco, H Mart, O'Reilly, Mattress Firm, Jimmy Johns, and Orange Theory2019 Park Avenue Center 1919-1931 Skokie Valley Blvd Highland Park IL SEC Skokie Valley Blvd & Park Ave 70,131 Staples, Trek Bicycle, Illinois Bone & Joint, and Foss Swim School2019 * Aldi - Gurnee * 18824 W Grand Ave Gurnee IL NWQ Grand Ave & N Hutchins Rd 19,800 ALDI2019 * Raising Cane's - Batavia * 1998 McKee St Batavia IL SEC Randall & McKee St 4,000 Raising Cane's Restaurant2018 Aldi - Vernon Hills 1800 Milwaukee Ave Vernon Hills IL NWC Milwaukee Ave & Greggs Parkway 19,800 ALDI2017 The Corners of Brookfield 20111 W Bluemound Rd Brookfield WI Bluemound Rd & Barker Rd 750,000Von Maur, Free People, Anthropologie, Silverspot Cinema, Lululemon, Café Hollander, Sendik's Food Market, Cycle Bar, LL Bean, Goddess & Baker, 244 Apartment Units2016 Harwood Heights 7308 W Lawrence Ave Harwood Heights IL NWC Harlem Ave & Lawrence Ave 90,000 Art Van & Portillo's2016 AT&T - Rolling Meadows 1155 Golf Rd Rolling Meadows IL SWC Golf Rd & Algonquin Rd 4,300 Five Guys, Noodles & Co, Jimmy Johns, T-Mobile, Chipotle, Hand & Stone Massage and Panera Bread2016 Mariano's - Orland Park 9504 142nd St Orland Park IL NEQ LaGrange Rd & 143rd St 84,000 Mariano's Fresh Market2016 Mariano's - Westmont 150 W 63rd St Westmont IL NWQ 63rd St & Cass Ave 84,000 Mariano's Fresh Market2016 Lombard 435 W Roosevelt Rd Lombard L SEC Roosevelt & Finley 90,000 Mariano's Fresh Market2015 Just Tires - Lake Zurich 175 Quentin Rd Lake Zurich IL NWC Rt 22 & Quentin Rd 6,600 Just Tires2014 Fox Run Square 1212 S Naper Blvd Naperville IL NEC 75th St & Naper Blvd 143,469 Mariano's Fresh Market, ACE Hardware, ATI, GNC, Massage Envy2013 AAA 1680 N Milwaukee Ave Vernon Hills IL SWC Milwaukee Ave & Gregg's Pkwy 9,000 AAA2014 Mariano's - Lake Zurich 1350 E Rt 22 Lake Zurich IL NWC Rt 22 & Quentin Rd 90,000 Mariano's Fresh Market, PNC Bank, McDonald’s2013 Mariano's - Harwood Heights 7401 W Lawrence Ave Harwood Heights IL SWC Lawrence Ave & Oketo Ave 82,000 Mariano's Fresh Market2013 Mariano's - Wheaton 625 S Main St Wheaton IL NWC Roosevelt Rd & Naperville Rd 85,000 Mariano's Fresh Market2013 Mariano's - Frankfort 21001 S La Grange Rd Frankfort IL NEC Rt 30 & La Grange Rd 85,000 Mariano's Fresh Market, Physicians Immediate Care, Noodles & Company, Jersey Mike’s2012 HH Gregg - Crystal Lake 4483 Rt 14 Crystal Lake IL SEQ Rt 31 & Rt 14 32,446 hhgregg2012 Mariano's - Palatine 545 N Hicks Rd Palatine IL NEQ Hicks Rd & Baldwin Rd 80,000 Mariano's Fresh Market, PNC Bank2011 Chase - Downers Grove 6241 Main St Downers Grove IL NEC 63rd St & Main St 3,819 Chase2011 HH Gregg - Niles 5701 W Touhy Ave Niles IL SEQ Touhy Ave & Lehigh Ave 36,876 hhgregg, PNC Bank2010 Chase - Park Ridge 500 Busse Hwy Park Ridge IL SWC Busse Hwy & Greenwood Ave 4,121 Chase2009 Franklin Marketplace 10420 Grand Ave Franklin Park IL NWC Grand Ave & Mannheim Rd 19,430 CVS Pharmacy, Chase, Sonic2008 ALDI - Northlake 50 W North Ave Northlake IL NEC North Ave & Hillside Ave 17,000 ALDI2008 Chase - Barrington 136 Northwest Hwy Barrington IL NEC Rt 14 & Prospect Ave 4,604 Chase2008 Gregg's Landing South1640 N Milwaukee Ave Vernon Hills IL SWC Milwaukee Ave & Gregg's Pkwy285,000 Lowe's, Mariano’s Fresh Market, AAA, Staples, MB Bank, Starbucks, Panda Express, Jersey Mike’s2008 Ogden Hill 1200 Ogden Ave Montgomery IL US Hwy 30 & Rt 34 534,000 Menards, JCPenney, Office Depot2008 Somers Market Center 6119 31st St. Somers WI NWC Rt 31 & 38th St 400,000 Walmart Supercenter, Sam’s Club 700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COMPrincipals’ Development History61 PROJECTS - OVER 7 MILLION SF82007 Spring Hill Retail Shops 27 S Western Ave Carpentersville IL SWC Rt 31 & Huntley Rd 15,616 Chase, Jamba Juice, US Cellular, Panda Express, 2nd Wind, SportClips2007 Bradford Commons 2728 W 75th St Naperville IL SEC Rt 59 & 75th St 80,000 XSport Fitness, Starbucks, SportClips, La Hacienda2006 Bradford Square 122 W North Ave Northlake IL NWC North Ave & Hillside Ave 14,976 Chase, Potbelly Sandwich Works, Panda Express, Cingular2006 South Holland Retail Shops 390 E 162nd St South Holland IL NWC 162nd St & South Park Ave 20,820 Walgreens, Chase, Cleaners Depot2005 The Marketplace of Glenwood 18701 S Halsted St Glenwood IL SEC 187th St & Halsted St 50,000 ALDI, Chase, Autozone2005 Walgreens 3009 W St Charles Rd Lombard IL SWC St Charles Rd & Elizabeth St 14,000 Walgreens2005 Shoppes of Elmhurst 680 E North Ave Elmhurst IL SWQ North Ave & Route 83 8,000 Starbucks, ATI, Sport Clips, Jimmy John's2004 CVS Pharmacy 200 W Northwest Hwy Palatine IL NWC Rt 14 & Smith Rd 13,013 CVS Pharmacy2004 CVS Pharmacy 1855 W Irving Park Rd Schaumburg IL SEC Irving Park Rd & Wise Rd 13,013 CVS Pharmacy2004 Greenfield Commons 2360 W Indian Trl Aurora IL SEC Indian Trail Rd & Orchard Rd 225,000 Lowe's, Office Depot, Factory Card Outlet, Bank of America, CVS2004 Market Place of Darien 2425 75th St Darien IL SWC 75th St & Lyman Ave 35,600Oakbrook Bank, Back to Bed, SportClips, Cleaners Depot, Vitamin Shoppe, Cingular Wireless, Chicago Home Fitness, WineStyles, Panda Express, Jimmy Johns2004 Market Place 413 N Milwaukee Ave Vernon Hills IL SEQ Townline Rd & Milwaukee Ave 190,000 Redevelopment of Super Kmart to: Bed Bath & Beyond, JoAnn Fabrics, DSW Shoes, Ashley Furniture, Old Navy2004 Walgreens 562 Main St Hamilton OH Main St & Eaton Ave 13,650 Walgreens2004 Walmart Supercenter 2500 W 95th St Evergreen Park IL NWC Western Ave & 95th St 151,980 Walmart Supercenter, Sam’s Club2003 Village Center 5720 Washington Ave Mt. Pleasant WI Village Center Dr & Hwy 20 11,600 Chipotle, Noodles & Co, Starbucks, Kinko’s, AT&T Wireless2003 The Crossings 5500 Washington Ave Mt. Pleasant WI Village Center Dr & Hwy 20 250,000 Kohl’s, Jewel-Osco, Catherine’s, Panera Bread, Cost Cutters, Sally Beauty, Hallmark, Dress Barn, Shoe Carnival2003 Meadows Crossing Shopping Center 1317 Golf Rd Rolling Meadows IL SWC Golf Rd & Algonquin Rd 240,000 Meijer, Chipotle, Washington Mutual, Cookies by Design, Gino’s T-Mobile, Honey Baked Ham, Game Stop2003 The Landing 159 N Weber Rd Bolingbrook IL SWC Weber Rd & Boughton Rd 112,500 PetSmart, Pier One, Sears Appliance, OfficeMax, Borders Books, Outlots2003 Walgreens 57 W Main St Amelia OH Main St & Chapel Rd 14,560 Walgreens2003 Shoppes of Riverwoods 2001 N Milwaukee Ave Riverwoods IL NEQ Milwaukee Ave & Deerfield Pkwy 30,000 Panera Bread, Chase Bank, Jimmy John's2002 Archway East 815 Cog Cir Crystal Lake IL NWC Rt 31 & Rt 14 12,000 Vitamin Shoppe, Chicago Home Fitness, Corner Bakery, Nextel, Portillo’s, TGIF Fridays2002 Walgreens 2751 E Main St St. Charles IL SWC Main St & Lakeside Dr 13,905 Walgreens2000 Strip Center 2558 W Schaumburg Rd Schaumburg IL NEC Schaumburg Rd & Barrington Rd 15,000 Chipotle, Hallmark, PrimeCo, Mattress Giant2000 The Home Depot Center 950 Rt 59 Bartlett IL SWC Rt 59 & Stearns Rd 180,000 Home Depot, First American Bank, KFC/Taco Bell/Pizza Hut, Outlots1999 Sam's Club - Batavia 501 N Randall Rd Batavia IL Route 31 & south of Fabyan 150,000 Sam’s Club, Portillo’s, Bennigans, Chuck E Cheese1999 Market Place 1460 Golf Rd Rolling Meadows IL NWC Algonquin Rd & Golf Rd 391,114 Walmart, Sam's Club, Chili’s, Old Country Buffet, Small Shops1998 The Marketplace South 235 N Milwaukee Ave Vernon Hills IL Rt 60 & Milwaukee Ave 360,000 Sam's Club, Kohl’s, Extended Stay America, Evanston NW Hospital, Carpet Wholesale, US Bank1998 Walgreens 101 Lily Cache Ln Bolingbrook IL SWC Route 53 & Lily Cache 13,905 Walgreens1997 Odyssey West 3440 Odyssey Ct Naperville IL NWC Route 88 & Route 59 700,000 Car Max, Odyssey Fun World1997 Westhill Plaza 2201 S Kensington Dr Appleton WI SWQ Kensington Dr & Calumet St 275,000 Home Depot, PetsMart, Burlington Coat Factory, Small Shops1997 Deer Grove Crossing 609 Dundee Rd Palatine IL SWC Rand Rd & Dundee Rd 180,000 Home Depot, Starbucks, Sprint, Midas, Dunkin Donuts, Small Shops1996 Circuit City - Green Bay 1940 W Mason St Green Bay WI Mason St & US 41 26,000 Circuit City1996 Portage Crossings 6087 Hwy 6 Portage IN SEC Hwy 6 & Willowcreek Rd 300,000 Wamart, Jewel-Osco, Hollywood Video, McDonald’s, Taco Bell, Eyeglass Emporium OUTLINE•Site Location•Project Summary•Flexibility Matrix (Forthcoming)•Preliminary Site Plan•Floor Plan•Elevations•Material Board•Survey•Landscape Plan700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM9 SITE LOCATION700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM10 PROJECT SUMMARY700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM11NORR and Larson Engineering are working on behalf of Kensington Development Partners to manage the development of Phase III of Lexington Station.In 2013, the City approved a Master PUD for the Lexington Station redevelopment project at the southwest corner of Lexington Avenue North and Red FoxRoad. The total project area is 7.57 acres in size and is comprised of three separate parcels (3833 and 3771 Lexington Avenue and 1120 Red Fox Road).Phase I of the development was completed in 2013-14 and Phase II was completed in 2017-2018. Phase III, as described in this narrative, will complete thedevelopment and secure Lexington Station as a retail destination in Arden Hills.Modifications to the Master PUDPhase III shall consist of the demolition of the existing multi-tenant building and redevelopment of Lot 3, Block 1, of the Roberts Addition to Arden Hills.Kensington Development Partners is seeking modifications to the Master PUD to accommodate a new proposed design of this approximately 4.24-acre site.The existing approved PUD for Phase III depicts (2) separate one-story buildings, one 17,841 SF Retail Anchor and one 15,210 SF Retail/Office building. Theproposed plan would consist of a one-story grocery anchor with a total of 207 parking spaces. The proposed changes to the parking fields in Phase I and IIwould increase the total parking of the development to 421 spaces while maintaining access and circulation aisles. During construction of Phase III,theplanned new access driveway on Lexington Avenue in alignment with the Target service road will be completed and the existing Lexington Ave driveway wouldbe closed.Building DesignKensington Development Partners proposes the construction of a building to match the cohesive design of the existing buildings of Phase I and IIdevelopments. The use of similar materials and design features will seek to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality andtimeless materials. The transparency requirements have been considered in the development and met with the use of opaque windows in the anticipatedservice areas. The non-primary facades will utilize the previously approved rock face CMU, with color consistent with the brick building material, on the non-primary façade of the retail building in Phase II. FLEXIBILITY MATRIX700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM12B-3 District Standards Development ProposalMinimum Lot Area13,000 SF 183,694 SFMaximum Building Height35 FT 35 FTMaximum Floor Area Ratio0.8 0.23Maximum Structure Coverage40% 23%Minimum Front Yard Setback50 FT 140.5 FTMinimum Rear Yard Setback20 FT 37 FTMinimum Side Yard Setback20 ft (min) / 40 ft (total) 68 FT (min) / 229 FT (total) PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM13GNIDLIUBDESOPORPFS000,348282138197999999725LEXINGTON AVENUEEXISTINGBUILDING'54DUMPSTERENCLOSURECOMPACTOR'222194''212'43.3324''42'42CROSS ACCESS PREDICTEDON APPROVAL BYNEIGHBORING TENANTS68.67''15.041'90.73161.33''42'819' 9''8163''4224' 12' 26''15.7EXISTING ACCESSTO BE REMOVEDDescriptionRev. DateLEXINGTON STATIONPHASE 3RED FOX ROADARDEN HILLS, MN 55112Sheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:12206100.000TJRMJW10.07.203524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2020 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2020\12206100 - Lexington Station - Phase 3 (Kensington Development)\C. Design\Drawing Files\12206100 C200 - Paving.dwg3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.Project Title:KENSINGTONDEVELOPMENTPARTNERS700 COMMERCE DRIVE - SUITE 130OAK BROOK, IL 60523Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the state of Minnesota.PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0NORTH15 30 60Sheet:PAVING PLANC200STANDARD PARKING STALLS = 200ADA PARKING STALLS = 7TOTAL PARKING STALLS = 207PARKING STALL COUNTMinimum Lot AreaMaximum Floor Area RatioMaximum Structure CoverageMinimum Front Yard SetbackMinimum Rear Yard SetbackMinimum Side Yard SetbackB-3 Distict Standards13,000 SF0.840%50 ft20 ft20 ft (min) / 40 ft (total)Development Proposal183,694 SF0.2323%140.5 ft37 ft68 ft (min) / 229 ft (total) FLOOR PLAN700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM14 ELEVATIONS700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM15 ELEVATIONS700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM16 MATERIAL BOARD700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM17 SURVEY700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM18 LANDSCAPE PLAN700 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 130, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.402.6065WWW.KENSINGTONDEV.COM19 Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM DATE:April 7, 2021 PC Agenda Item 3.D TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM:Corrin Bemis, Planning Consultant SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-006 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Robert Kunze Property Location: 4073 Valentine Court Request: Variance Requested Action Robert Kunze (“Applicant”) has requested a variance to decrease the required side yard setback of their single-family detached dwelling for a proposed garage addition located at 4073 Valentine Court (“Subject Property”), ordinance requires a forty (40) foot side yard setback on corner lots. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant is requesting a variance to decrease the required side yard setback of his single- family detached dwelling on the Subject Property from 40 feet to 7.82 feet for a proposed garage addition. The Subject Property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District, and is guided as Low Density Residential in the land use plan. Section 1320.06 of the Arden Hills City Code requires a side yard setback of 40 feet on corner lots. According to the Applicant’s narrative submitted as a part of his application, the Subject Property includes unique circumstances due to its nontraditional shape. The front of the property includes one curved section and three straight sections that make it difficult for the applicant to conform to current setback regulations. The Subject Property is a legal non-conforming lot, as the required side yard setback for corner lots was ten (10) feet when the property was built in 1953. The Applicant is requesting the proposed garage addition to allow for more storage space for his vehicles and additional space to store woodworking equipment. The proposed garage addition would meet applicable building codes and all other regulations in the R-1 District. The applicant would not be able to construct the proposed garage addition without a variance. The Planning Commission is being asked to determine if a variance request for flexibility with the side yard setback of a corner lot should be approved. The sketches that have been submitted show the location of the proposed garage addition and the proposed driveway addition. The evaluation Page 2 of 6 of the proposal should be based on the District Provisions in Section 1320 and the Requirements for a Variance in Section 1355.04, Subd. 4. Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1.District Provisions (R-1 Single Family Residential District) – Section 1320.06 Lot Size and Dimensions The Subject Property has a lot area of 37,541 square feet (Attachment D). Section 1320 – District Provisions of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot size of 14,000 square feet per dwelling unit. Section 1320 allows for a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.3 in the R-1 District. With the proposed garage addition, the FAR on the Subject Property would increase from 0.04 to 0.05. Section 1320 requires a minimum landscape coverage of 65% and a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25% in the R-1 District. With the proposed garage addition, the impervious surface coverage on the lot would increase from 6.02% to 7.56%. According to the Applicant, the proposed garage addition on the Subject Property will meet all district provisions for the R-1 district besides the side yard setback requirement. Structure Setbacks – Flexibility Requested In the R-1 District, the minimum front and rear setback requirements for a property are forty (40) feet and thirty (30) feet, respectively. The minimum side yard setback on a corner lot is forty (40) feet. The current structure is located approximately twenty (20) feet from the side yard property line. The Subject Property is a legal non-conforming lot, as the required side yard setback for corner lots was ten (10) feet when the property was built in 1953. Page 3 of 6 The proposed garage addition would be setback 7.82 feet from the Northwest side yard property line. According to the applicant’s application, the proposed addition would be setback approximately twenty-seven (27) feet from the existing curb line. The proposed garage addition would conform to front and rear setback requirements. According to the Applicant, this request for a decreased side yard setback minimum would have no impact on the neighborhood character because the existing neighborhood includes a number of garage additions and has a variety of different garage and housing styles. In their application, they cite the challenges of building the proposed garage addition on a non-traditionally shaped lot as a practical difficulty and argue that the decreased side yard setback will be used in a reasonable manner consistent with the purposed and intent of the City Code. 2.Variance Review The role of the Planning Commission is to determine and consider how the facts presented to them compare with the city’s articulated standards. The Commission should base their decision on the facts presented and then apply those facts to the legal standards contained in city ordinances and relevant state law. Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a variance request. While the Planning Commission may feel their decision should reflect the overall will of the residents, the task in considering a variance request is limited to evaluating how the variance application meets the statutory practical difficulties factors. Residents can often provide important facts that may help in addressing these factors, however, unsubstantiated opinions and reactions to a request do not form a legitimate basis for a variance decision. The Planning Commission may impose conditions when granting variances as long as the conditions are directly related and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. For instance, if a variance is granted to exceed the front setback limit, any conditions attached should presumably relate to mitigating the effect of the encroachment. 3.Variance Requirements – Section 1355.04, Subd. 4 The Applicant requests a variance to construct a third stall addition to the side of their existing garage that would impede on the require side yard setback on a corner lot in the R-1 Residential District. The Planning Commission will need to make a determination utilizing the following variance findings and criteria on whether there are practical difficulties with complying with the zoning regulations. If the applicant does not meet all the factors of thestatutory test, then a variance should not be granted. Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 1. Purpose and Intent. The variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the provisions of the City’s Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The variance request for 4073 Valentine Court is consistent with the purpose and intent of the R-1 Zoning District and with the policies within the City’s Comprehensive Plan; Page 4 of 6 2. Practical Difficulties. The Applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the Arden Hills Zoning Regulations. The term “Practical Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: a.Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. According to the Applicant’s application, a third car garage stall for a single family home is a reasonable use of the Subject Property in the R-1 Zoning District; b.Unique Circumstances. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. According to the Applicant’s application, the lot has a very odd shape. In the front of the house, along the road, there is one curved section and 3 straight sections. The structure is currently nonconforming as to setbacks. The setback requirements were different when the house was built in 1953. On the side, the closest distance from the curb to the proposed garage addition is approximately 27 feet. It is unlikely the city would want to make use of that property. There are significant small screening trees in that area, partly blocking the view from the street. Other areas on the property were considered for a freestanding garage. Any of the other areas in the front yard, or anywhere close to the house in the rear, would involve cutting down big 100+ year old Oaks. Adding behind the existing garage would involve significant drainage issues and would require major regrading under the drip line of some of the 100+ year old oaks.; c.Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. According to the Applicant’s application, the existing neighborhood has homes with a variety of different garages and housing styles. The proposed variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Many garages have been added to the road side of existing homes in the neighborhood. The topography and odd lot shapes make the neighborhood quite varied. The homes are not in straight lines, all the same distance from the road or each other. 3. Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a practical difficulty. The proposed variance is not based on economic consideration. 4. Access to Sunlight. Inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems shall be considered a practical difficulty. A solar energy system is not proposed. Page 5 of 6 Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. City Staff received a land use application for a variance request to decrease the minimum side yard setback on a single family dwelling at the Subject Property4073 Valentine Court. 2. A single-family detached dwelling is a permitted use in the R-1 district. 3. The Subject Propertyis non-conforming with the R-1 district’s standards for minimum side yard setbacks on a corner lot. 4. The proposed garage addition would be located 7.82 feet from the Northwest side yard property line. 5. The proposed garage addition of the subject parcel would conform to all other requirements and standards of the R-1 district. 6. A variance may be granted if enforcement of a provision in the zoning ordinance would cause the landowner practical difficulties. 7. Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. x Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-006 for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions below: 1. A Building Permit shall be issued prior to commencement of construction. 2. The proposed building shall conform to all other standards and regulations in the City Code. x Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 006 for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court, based on the findings of fact and the submitted materials. x Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial Planning Case 21-006 for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-006 for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court:a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Page 6 of 6 Notice Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within 500 feet of the Subject Property. Minnesota statute does not clearly require a public hearing before a variance is granted or denied, however, after consulting with the City Attorney, staff agree that the best practice is to allow public forum on all variance requests. A public forum allows the city to establish a record and elicit facts to help determine if the application meets the practical difficulties factors. Public Comments Staff have not received written or verbal comments in regards to this proposal as of April 1, 2021. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 25, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by May 24, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the Applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Variance Request Letter D. Site Survey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rom tax records: 1A-Residential Homestead From County records: 0.64 Acres 510 R - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, PLATTED LOT R1 Attachment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x 0=?,49,;;74.,?4:9>,=0>@-50.??:=0A40B,9/,;;=:A,7-D?30$4.0=006),?0=>30/ 4>?=4.?:9?,.?$)/4=0.?7D,? 1:=,//4?4:9,7491:=8,?4:9 x &307,9/@>0,;;74.,?4:9100>/:9:?.:A0=-@47/492>429:=:?30=;0=84?100>?3,? 8,D-0=0<@4=0/@;:9,;;=:A,7:1,7,9/@>0,;;74.,?4:9 x 77,;;74.,?4:9>B477-0>@-50.??:,//4?4:9,7100>1:==048-@=>0809?:1.:9>@7?,9?.:>?> ,>>:.4,?0/ B4?3 147492 =0A40B492 ,9/ ;=:.0>>492 :1 ,;;74.,?4:949?301:=8:1,9 0>.=:B?:?304?D Proposed addition of a third stall to side of existing garage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isclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN Statute 466.03 Subd 21. Location Map Lake Johanna BoulevardS a n d e e n R o a d LaLLaLLaLaLLaLaLLLLLLLLLLkekeekekkekekkkekkkkkJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnanannnnnnnnnnnanaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBoouououoouuuououoooooooeevaavaavvvvvdddddddddddeeeeevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrddddddrddrdrrrdrraaLaLaLaaLaaLaaLaLaaaLaLaLaLaaLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLekekekekekekekekekekekekekekeekeeeeekkkkkkkkkkkJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhoohohohhhhhhohhhohhhhhhhohhhohhohhohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooannnnnnanannnnnannnnnnnnannnnnnannnnnannnnannnnnnannnnnanananannnnnnananannnnnnannaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanaanaanananaaaananaaanaaanaaaanaaaanaaaaaaaanannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBuuuououououuuuououuuuuuouououuuuuououuuuouuuououuuouuuoooooooooeeeeeeeeleleeeeeleeeeeleeeeeeeeeeeeeleeeleeeeeeeleleeeleleeeleeleleeeelllllllllllllllllllllllllllvaavavaavavaaavaaaavavaaavavaaavaavaavaaaavavaaaavavavavaavaaavvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrdddddddddddrddddddddrdrdrdddrdrdrdrdrdrddrdrddrdrdrdddrdrdrrrrrrrrrrra d a d d a d ddddddd RRRR o R o o R o ooo R o o R o R o ooo R o R o R o R o oo R o o aaa d a d aa d aaa d a d aa d a d dd a ddddddddddddd RRRRRRRRRRRR o RR o R o R o SSSSS a a SSSS a a SS a SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS a SSSS a aaa SSS a a S a a S a nn d n d d n d dd nn dd nn d dd n d ddddd n d nn d n d n d d n d dd n d dd n dddd n d ddd n dd eee e e eeee e e e eee e eeeeeee e e eee e e ee e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee e e e e eeeeeee nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR SSS a S a S a S a SSSSSS a S a S a SS a SSSS a S a SS a SSSSSSSS a SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS a SSSSS a SSSSSSSS a SSSSSSSS a S a SSSSSSSSSS a SSS a S a a S a SSSS a SSSS a S a S a S a S a S a SS a S a S a S a S a S a SSS a S a S a S a S a S a aaa nnnnnn d n d nn d d n d n d ddd n d nn d n d d n d d n dd nnn d n d n d d nn d n d n d dddd n d n d n d n d dd n d n d n d dd n d n d dd n d n d n d n d dddd n d n d dddd n d n d n d n d ddddddddddd eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee e eeeeeeee e e e e e eee e ee e e e eee e e e ee e e e e e e e e e e e e ee e e e e e e e e e eeeeee e e e e e e e e e e eeeeeeee ee e e e e e e e e e e e e e eeee ee e e e e e e e eeee ee e e e e e e e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn RRRR o RRR o R o R o R o R o R o RR o R o RR o RRRRR o RRRRRR o R o R o R o R o o R o R o R o o R o o a d a d a d aa d a d a d a d a d dd a d d a d aa d a d a d ddd a d a d aa d d a d a d a d aa d aa d a d a dd a d aa d a d a d ddd a d d a d dddddd a d dddddddd ± Park and Open Space Subject Parcel §¨¦35W §¨¦694 £¤10/DNH9DOHQWLQH5RDG2OG+LJKZD\19DOHQWLQH$YHQXH 69§¨¦ $WWDFKPHQW% Robert Kunze 4073 Valentine Ct Arden Hills MN 55112 To: Arden Hills Planning Commission I'd like to add a 3rd stall to the side of my exiting garage. I worked with Mike Mrosla over the last few months. He, at first, thought there was a way to use some other hardship method to allow construction in this location, but after going over the details came to the conclusion I would need a variance. He thought the variance would likely be granted due to the conditions explained below. 1. Purpose and Intent. The variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the provisions of the City’s Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The variance request for 4073 VALENTINE CT is consistent with the purpose and intent of the R-1 Zoning District and with the policies within the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. Practical Difficulties. The Applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the Arden Hills Zoning Regulations. The term “Practical Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. A third car garage stall is a reasonable use of the Subject Property in the R-1 Zoning District. b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The lot has a very odd shape. In the front of the house, along the road, there is one curved section and 3 straight sections. The structure is currently nonconforming as to setbacks. The setback requirements were different when the house was built in 1953. On the side, the closest distance from the curb to the proposed garage addition is approximately 27 feet. It is unlikely the city would want to make use of that property. There are significant small screening trees in that area, partly blocking the view from the street. Other areas on the property were considered for a freestanding garage. Any of the other areas in the front yard, or anywhere close to the house in the rear, would involve cutting down big 100+ year old Oaks. Adding behind the existing garage would Attachment C involve significant drainage issues and would require major regrading under the drip line of some of the 100+ year old oaks. c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood has homes with a variety of different garages and housing styles. The proposed variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Many garages have been added to the road side of existing homes in the neighborhood. The topography and odd lot shapes make the neighborhood quite varied. The homes are not in straight lines, all the same distance from the road or each other. 3. Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a practical difficulty. The proposed variance is not based on economic consideration. It would be much less expensive to build a freestanding garage. 4. Access to Sunlight. Inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems shall be considered a practical difficulty. A solar energy system is not proposed. The proposed location would not involve any tree removal except one pyramidal arborvitae on the corner of the existing garage that is well past it's prime. It is the last of the original 60+ year old foundation plantings. It should have been replaced years ago. Part of it is currently held up by rope. Site drainage. This location would necessitate only very minor changes to site drainage. Half the water from behind the house currently runs through about where the outside edge of the new garage would sit. A small amount of soil would need to be removed from the new path for the water and this would be added next to the new construction. This would keep the water away from the new foundation. The addition would be constructed to match the existing house. The siding, windows, doors, and garage door were all replaced a few years ago, and are still available. The height of the existing house peak is 23 ft, and the existing garage peak is 12.5 ft. Sincerely, Robert Kunze RJKUNZE1@UMN.EDU 651-269-7649 3/23/21 Attachment D