HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-12-21-RAPPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not
currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you
must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each
person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three
(3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting
to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or
threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City
shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may
not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the
issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an
issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that
review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES
STAFF COMMENTS
COVID -19 Update
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 15, 2021 City Council Work Session
03 -15 -21 -WS.PDF
March 15, 2021 Special City Council
03 -15 -21 -SR.PDF
March 22, 2021 Special City Council Work Session
03 -22 -21 -SWS.PDF
March 22, 2021 Regular City Council
03 -22 -21 -R.PDF
CONSENT CALENDAR
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format.
There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so
requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.
Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll
Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst
MEMO.PDF
Motion To Authorize The City Administrator To Send Letter To Lake Johanna Fire
Department Regarding Entering Into Closest Unit Agreement With Vadnais
Heights Fire Department
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -017 In Support Of Arden Manor Improvements
Community Development Block Grant Application
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Payment No. 4 And Authorize Change Orders Nos. 3 And 4 –
Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Motion To Authorize Purchase Of Public Works Equipment (Portable Message
Board, Portable Light Tower, And 3 Mowers)
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
ATTACHMENT E.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -018 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Karth Lake Runoff Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -019 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Hamline Avenue Crosswalks And
Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Development Agreement And Memorandum Of Understanding
With Kensington Development For Construction Of Temporary Signal On
Lexington Avenue At Target South Access Road –PC 21 -004
Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the
general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment Roll
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution 2021 -020 Adopting Special Assessment Roll –2021 PMP Street And
Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Resolution 2021 -021 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To C & L
Excavating, Inc. –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Resolution 2021 -022 Receiving Feasibility Report And Calling For A Public Hearing
–Old Snelling Avenue North And County Road E Street And Utility Improvements
Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:
David Grant
Councilmembers:
Brenda Holden
Fran Holmes
Dave McClung
Steve Scott
Regular City Council
Agenda
April 12, 2021
7:00 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651 -792 -7800
Website :
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom
T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it
into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83350533734
This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our
website.
CALL TO ORDER
1.
2.
3.
4.
4.A.
Documents:
5.
5.A.
Documents:
5.B.
Documents:
5.C.
Documents:
5.D.
Documents:
6.
6.A.
Documents:
6.B.
Documents:
6.C.
Documents:
6.D.
Documents:
6.E.
Documents:
6.F.
Documents:
6.G.
Documents:
6.H.
Documents:
7.
8.
8.A.
Documents:
9.
9.A.
Documents:
9.B.
Documents:
9.C.
Documents:
10.
11.
APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 15, 2021 City Council Work Session
03 -15 -21 -WS.PDF
March 15, 2021 Special City Council
03 -15 -21 -SR.PDF
March 22, 2021 Special City Council Work Session
03 -22 -21 -SWS.PDF
March 22, 2021 Regular City Council
03 -22 -21 -R.PDF
CONSENT CALENDAR
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format.
There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so
requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.
Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll
Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst
MEMO.PDF
Motion To Authorize The City Administrator To Send Letter To Lake Johanna Fire
Department Regarding Entering Into Closest Unit Agreement With Vadnais
Heights Fire Department
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -017 In Support Of Arden Manor Improvements
Community Development Block Grant Application
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Payment No. 4 And Authorize Change Orders Nos. 3 And 4 –
Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Motion To Authorize Purchase Of Public Works Equipment (Portable Message
Board, Portable Light Tower, And 3 Mowers)
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
ATTACHMENT E.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -018 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Karth Lake Runoff Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -019 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Hamline Avenue Crosswalks And
Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Development Agreement And Memorandum Of Understanding
With Kensington Development For Construction Of Temporary Signal On
Lexington Avenue At Target South Access Road –PC 21 -004
Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the
general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment Roll
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution 2021 -020 Adopting Special Assessment Roll –2021 PMP Street And
Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Resolution 2021 -021 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To C & L
Excavating, Inc. –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Resolution 2021 -022 Receiving Feasibility Report And Calling For A Public Hearing
–Old Snelling Avenue North And County Road E Street And Utility Improvements
Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda April 12, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83350533734This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:
5.
5.A.
Documents:
5.B.
Documents:
5.C.
Documents:
5.D.
Documents:
6.
6.A.
Documents:
6.B.
Documents:
6.C.
Documents:
6.D.
Documents:
6.E.
Documents:
6.F.
Documents:
6.G.
Documents:
6.H.
Documents:
7.
8.
8.A.
Documents:
9.
9.A.
Documents:
9.B.
Documents:
9.C.
Documents:
10.
11.
APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESMarch 15, 2021 City Council Work Session03-15 -21 -WS.PDFMarch 15, 2021 Special City Council03-15 -21 -SR.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Special City Council Work Session03-22 -21 -SWS.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Regular City Council03-22 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Authorize The City Administrator To Send Letter To Lake Johanna Fire Department Regarding Entering Into Closest Unit Agreement With Vadnais Heights Fire DepartmentDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -017 In Support Of Arden Manor Improvements
Community Development Block Grant Application
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
Motion To Approve Payment No. 4 And Authorize Change Orders Nos. 3 And 4 –
Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement Project
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Motion To Authorize Purchase Of Public Works Equipment (Portable Message
Board, Portable Light Tower, And 3 Mowers)
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
ATTACHMENT E.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -018 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Karth Lake Runoff Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -019 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of
Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Hamline Avenue Crosswalks And
Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Development Agreement And Memorandum Of Understanding
With Kensington Development For Construction Of Temporary Signal On
Lexington Avenue At Target South Access Road –PC 21 -004
Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the
general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment Roll
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution 2021 -020 Adopting Special Assessment Roll –2021 PMP Street And
Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Resolution 2021 -021 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To C & L
Excavating, Inc. –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Resolution 2021 -022 Receiving Feasibility Report And Calling For A Public Hearing
–Old Snelling Avenue North And County Road E Street And Utility Improvements
Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda April 12, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83350533734This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:
6.C.
Documents:
6.D.
Documents:
6.E.
Documents:
6.F.
Documents:
6.G.
Documents:
6.H.
Documents:
7.
8.
8.A.
Documents:
9.
9.A.
Documents:
9.B.
Documents:
9.C.
Documents:
10.
11.
APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESMarch 15, 2021 City Council Work Session03-15 -21 -WS.PDFMarch 15, 2021 Special City Council03-15 -21 -SR.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Special City Council Work Session03-22 -21 -SWS.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Regular City Council03-22 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Authorize The City Administrator To Send Letter To Lake Johanna Fire Department Regarding Entering Into Closest Unit Agreement With Vadnais Heights Fire DepartmentDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -017 In Support Of Arden Manor Improvements Community Development Block Grant Application Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 4 And Authorize Change Orders Nos. 3 And 4 –Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement ProjectDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Authorize Purchase Of Public Works Equipment (Portable Message Board, Portable Light Tower, And 3 Mowers)David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -018 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Karth Lake Runoff ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -019 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Hamline Avenue Crosswalks And Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Motion To Approve Development Agreement And Memorandum Of Understanding
With Kensington Development For Construction Of Temporary Signal On
Lexington Avenue At Target South Access Road –PC 21 -004
Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the
general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment Roll
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution 2021 -020 Adopting Special Assessment Roll –2021 PMP Street And
Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
Resolution 2021 -021 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To C & L
Excavating, Inc. –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Resolution 2021 -022 Receiving Feasibility Report And Calling For A Public Hearing
–Old Snelling Avenue North And County Road E Street And Utility Improvements
Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda April 12, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83350533734This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:6.G.Documents:
6.H.
Documents:
7.
8.
8.A.
Documents:
9.
9.A.
Documents:
9.B.
Documents:
9.C.
Documents:
10.
11.
APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSCOVID-19 UpdateDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESMarch 15, 2021 City Council Work Session03-15 -21 -WS.PDFMarch 15, 2021 Special City Council03-15 -21 -SR.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Special City Council Work Session03-22 -21 -SWS.PDFMarch 22, 2021 Regular City Council03-22 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDFMotion To Authorize The City Administrator To Send Letter To Lake Johanna Fire Department Regarding Entering Into Closest Unit Agreement With Vadnais Heights Fire DepartmentDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -017 In Support Of Arden Manor Improvements Community Development Block Grant Application Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 4 And Authorize Change Orders Nos. 3 And 4 –Air Express, Inc. –City Hall HVAC Replacement ProjectDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFMotion To Authorize Purchase Of Public Works Equipment (Portable Message Board, Portable Light Tower, And 3 Mowers)David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -018 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Karth Lake Runoff ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -019 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To Pember Companies, Inc. –Hamline Avenue Crosswalks And Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve Development Agreement And Memorandum Of Understanding With Kensington Development For Construction Of Temporary Signal On Lexington Avenue At Target South Access Road –PC 21 -004Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGS2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment RollDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFNEW BUSINESSResolution 2021 -020 Adopting Special Assessment Roll –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFResolution 2021 -021 Accepting Bid And Authorizing Award Of Contract To C & L Excavating, Inc. –2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
Resolution 2021 -022 Receiving Feasibility Report And Calling For A Public Hearing
–Old Snelling Avenue North And County Road E Street And Utility Improvements
Project
David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Mayor:David Grant Councilmembers:Brenda Holden Fran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council Agenda April 12, 20217:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone:651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83350533734This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:6.G.Documents:6.H.Documents:7.8.8.A.Documents:9.9.A.Documents:9.B.Documents:
9.C.
Documents:
10.
11.
Page 1 of 1
STAFF COMMENTS – 4A
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
April 12, 2021
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$ $ $
A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting.
Approved: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MARCH 15, 2021
5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council
Work Session at 5:00 p.m.
Note: On March 20th, the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate
in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021
Present via telephone: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran
Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault, Interim Public Works Director David
Swearingen, and Deputy City Clerk Jolene Trauba
Also present via telephone: Bolton & Menk Planning Consultants Jane Kansier and
Corrin Bemis, HR Green Consultant Joe Vavrina, Chick-fil-A Principal Development
Leader Justin Lurk, Boston Scientific Facilities Director Lorne Rothbauer, Boston
Scientific Facility Engineer Jeff Hejl, Boston Scientific Environmental Health and Safety
Specialists Nicole Lancaster and Sue Thompson, RSP Architects Project Managers John
Larson and Joe Ford
1. AGENDA ITEMS
A. Planning Case 21-003 – 3855 Lexington Ave N Redevelopment Concept Plan (Old
Perkins Site)
Planning Consultant Bemis stated that Chick-fil-A has submitted an application for Concept
Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 1.535-acre parcel located at 3855 Lexington Avenue. The
Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and
have an informal discussion regarding the proposed site plan.
Planning Consultant Bemis said the applicant is proposing to raze the building and redevelop
the site with a new single story approximately 5,000 square foot free-standing restaurant, dual
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 2
drive-thru facility with free-standing canopies, 50-stall parking lot, and associated utilities. The
property is currently zoned B-3 (Service Business District), which permits restaurants with drive-
thru facilities via a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is looking for flexibility in a few areas.
The City Code requires a total of 58 parking spaces for a restaurant use containing 116 indoor and
outdoor seating spaces and the applicant is proposing a total of 50 parking spaces on the site. The
applicant is also requesting flexibility on the drive-thru facilities, specifically of setback
requirements for the two canopies proposed on the site. The applicant is proposing to install two
free-standing canopies over the drive-thru lane: An order point canopy to be located north of the
building, setback 14.7 feet from the property line; and an order meal delivery canopy to be located
on the west side of the building, over the pick-up window, setback 2.3 feet from the property line.
The Zoning Code requires accessory structures to be setback 10 feet from the property line in the
B-3 District. The Zoning Code lists special requirements for drive-up facilities. One of these
requirements states no drive-up facility shall be located within 1,320’ of another facility. The
nearest drive-up facility is the Starbucks, located to the south across Red Fox Road. The Zoning
Code also requires any electronic devices, including loudspeakers, be located at least 50’ from any
lot line. The nearest order box on the west side of the site is located approximately 20’ from the
west property boundary. Finally, the applicant is requesting flexibility on landscaping. The
parking and drive-thru lane on the east side of the property will be located approximately 11’ from
the property line. On the west side of the property, the drive thru lane is proposed to be located
about 2.3’ from the west lot line. The Zoning code requires a 20’ setback from the front lot line
and a 10’ setback from the side lot line.
Chick-fil-A Principal Development Leader Justin Lurk said they are a family owned franchise
business where franchisees are only awarded one location. Franchisees live in the community and
their main priority is to have a great operation at their location. There are over 2,500 locations
nationwide.
Mr. Lurk explained the two-lane drive-thru that continues as two lanes to the pick-up door.
Councilmember Holden stated her concern about the 2.3’ setback from the property line. She
wondered about a car jumping the curb and how they would handle snow plowing.
Mr. Lurk said they are requesting flexibility on that requirement and the 2.3’ from the west
property line is the distance to the edge of the drive-thru canopy, the columns are about 4.5’ away
from the property line, and the drive through lane is 5’ from the property line.
HR Green Consultant Joe Vavrina added that from the property line to drive-thru lane is 5.5’
because the curb is 6”. Also, from the back of the Quality Inn property line to the curb is 6’.
Mr. Lurk stated that from the back of the curb line at the Quality Inn to the back of the curb line
at the drive through will be about 9.5’.
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier shared an aerial of the property to further illustrate the
property lines and distance from curbs.
Mr. Vavrina explained there are two areas to store snow, there will be a basin behind the
building and another on the north side of the property.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 3
Councilmember Holden asked how they would stop the snow from going into the neighboring
parking lot.
Mr. Vavrina explained they would start plowing on the outer edge and plow toward the building
and the catch basin and not pushed out beyond the curb to the neighbor’s property.
Councilmember Holden asked how much parking they need.
Mr. Vavrina expressed they would like to have more parking spaces but there isn’t room for
more.
Councilmember Holden stated she would like a sidewalk from the property line on the east to
the property line on the west and an agreement with the Quality Inn that they would provide extra
parking space if needed.
Mr. Lurk said they are proposing a sidewalk along Red Fox Road from Lexington to the property
line and they are in discussions with the Quality Inn regarding a shared parking agreement.
Councilmember Scott asked if the edge of the current parking for the Perkins lot coincides with
the drive-up lanes.
Mr. Vavrina responded that the drive thru lanes will be approximately 6” further to the east.
Councilmember Scott asked if the canopy would be lit but not on the outside edge, so the
residents of the hotel wouldn’t be exposed to any light pollution.
Mr. Lurk confirmed the lighting would be pointing down. And noted the new drive-thru design
is in response to COVID-19 and dining rooms not being open. It’s hard to predict what customers
will do post COVID-19.
Mayor Grant asked about exterior building materials.
Mr. Vavrina said it will be brick on all four sides of the building, with 2 variations of brick color.
Mayor Grant asked if they would be asking for any variances for construction materials.
Planning Consultant Bemis replied that she didn’t think so at this time but staff would have to
look more closely as the application moves forward.
Mayor Grant wanted to know the setback of the building from the Lexington Avenue property
line.
Mr. Vavrina responded that it will be 84’ from the property line. The grade is steep from east to
west and a preliminary grading plan shows the drive-thru lanes will work. They are also
proposing to add a sidewalk on Red Fox Road.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 4
Mr. Vavrina explained further how snowplowing would be handled to bring snow to the
stormwater management area north of the building. They will work with Rice Creek Water
District on water quality, but they are reducing the amount of impervious that is there.
Councilmember Holmes wondered if the Quality Inn parking lot was part of the issue with the
setbacks.
Mr. Vavrina responded yes, the hotel parking lot setback is at 5’6” so even in today’s conditions
they don’t meet the setbacks.
Councilmember Holmes asked if they could flip the plans so the driveway was on the east side.
Councilmember Scott said the traffic can only go counter clockwise through the drive-thru in
order to have the drivers on the correct side of the vehicle.
Councilmember Holden suggested they move the monument sign closer to Lexington Avenue
for better visibility. She said she was opposed to have signage on the west side of the building
because of the hotel and the small amount of traffic coming from that direction.
Councilmember Holden asked how many customers could be inside the building.
Mr. Lurk said there are 92 interior seats and 24 patio seats. A typical number is staff is 10-15
during the largest shift.
Councilmember Holden asked how they would control the sound from the drive-thru speakers.
Mr. Lurk said there would be landscaping between the order points and the property lines, and
would clarify sound control at the next meeting.
Mr. Lurk noted their typical hours of operation are 6:30 am to 10 pm.
Councilmember McClung said he is concerned with the proposed order board facing the hotel.
He wondered if they could shift the building to the east five feet to allow for a larger space
between the order boards and the hotel.
Mr. Lurk mentioned that the real estate broker has been in discussions with the Quality Inn for
shared parking and said they will contact the hotel owner to address his other concerns.
Mayor Grant asked if all the glass on the building would be transparent.
Mr. Lurk replied that the majority of the glass is transparent with the exception of the small
windows near the back of the building where the kitchen will be located, they will be glazed glass.
Councilmember Holmes asked for clarification of the proposed canopy.
Mr. Lurk explained that during peak hours associates will be in the drive-thru lanes taking orders
face to face under the canopy, giving the kitchen longer to prepare the food. During non-peak
hours the customer would order from the order boards.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 5
Mr. Lurk noted the follow up items of signage, noise, consider moving the monument sign,
distance between the Quality Inn and to discuss issues with the hotel owner. They will address as
many as possible before the next meeting.
Councilmember Scott wondered if they would have a flag pole.
Mr. Lurk said yes, there will be a new flag pole on the property.
B. Boston Scientific JCF Resolution and Neighborhood Concerns
City Administrator Perrault said at the March 8, 2021 City Council meeting Boston Scientific
asked the Council to consider an application for their Job Creation Fund. Council also asked to
discuss a letter from residents and address their concerns.
Boston Scientific Facility Engineer Jeff Hejl said he is the lead project manager for the Arden
Hills Building 14 expansion. He stated they had a neighborhood review meeting on December
14, 2020.
RSP Architects Project Manager John Larson presented the information that was shown at the
neighborhood meeting, including a map of the site and proposed expansion, explanation of the
materials, equipment, landscape and tree preservation plan, artists’ renderings and site photos.
Councilmember Holden wondered what trees would be take down.
Mr. Hejl stated buckthorn and one or two trees of substance will be taken out but replaced with
more caliper inches than what is removed. Some trees will also be relocated.
RSP Architects Project Manager and Joe Ford added the range of trees being removed start at
four caliper inches and go up to 14 caliper inches.
Mr. Hjel said they would like to respond to the letter received by the Council from Mr. Mills and
other neighbors. The first concern was regarding noise. They are aware that there has been
instances of garbage collection between 5:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., Boston Scientific has been in
touch with the hauler and has started to physically block off the refuse containers between 5:00
p.m. and 7 a.m. A noise study was done in January 2021 in regard to HVAC equipment noise.
Results indicated that noise levels did not exceed the night time noise limits. The argon and
nitrogen gas storage delivery company has been contacted regarding delivery times and the gate
will be locked during the same hours as refuse containers. In regard to previous noise studies, a
study done 15 years ago did show they were above PCA levels but steps were taken to reduce the
noise and they are in compliance now. They are working with a consultant to ensure the design of
the new building stays within the limits.
Councilmember Holmes asked if the equipment could be at ground level instead of in the
penthouse.
Mr. Ford said there were a number of constraints, one being the slope of the property. He didn’t
feel the sound trajectory would change being on the roof or the ground given the planned
screening. Operationally the equipment works better being overhead.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 6
Mr. Larson added that they equipment is significantly more efficient installed directly adjacent to
the space and overhead for ductwork and air returns.
Councilmember Holmes said it seemed from the last noise study they are right at the limit
borderline.
Mr. Larson reiterated they are working on the design to make sure additional sound is mitigated
and the new equipment won’t add to the noise.
Boston Scientific Environmental Health and Safety Specialist Sue Thompson stated that
Boston Scientific is currently at 48.9 decibels. Adding in the additional units will only raise the
decibels by about .8, and not make a drastic change on the amount of noise.
Councilmember Holmes suggested that Boston Scientific appoint a neighborhood liaison so
neighbors have a particular person to contact with concerns.
Mayor Grant asked if they will be reusing the space once the existing HVAC equipment is
removed.
Boston Scientific Facilities Director Lorne Rothbauer said there is one piece of equipment on
the north side of the building that can be eliminated once the new addition is built. There will still
be some equipment on that side of the building but most of the noise the neighbors are hearing is
the chiller that will be eliminated when it needs to be replaced.
Councilmember Holden asked if as if the sound gets louder as the equipment ages.
Mr. Hejl responded that may be true if the equipment wasn’t maintained but they have a
preventative maintenance program and equipment is inspected and repaired quarterly.
Councilmember McClung asked about receptor placement during the noise studies, he wondered
if they were at the height of a person, or possibly at the height of a deck or second story bedroom.
Mr. Ford said receptors are put at the height of the person who would be receiving the noise.
Mr. Rothbauer said they can ask to have the study modified.
Boston Scientific Environmental Health and Safety Specialist Nicole Lancaster explained the
site operates under a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Boston
Scientific has held the permit since 1995 and they must complete emissions reporting to show
they are in compliance. They are not close to the threshold and aren’t concerned about the
building expansion having a negative impact to the neighbors. There won’t be any change in
types of emissions coming from the facility. Boston Scientific has no knowledge of historical
spills or leakage.
Ms. Lancaster said in regard to land and water testing, they have done some testing. In 2019 they
had soil testing that was mitigated to the MPCA’s satisfaction in October of 2020. They also
partner with the Rice Creek Water District; each construction project has to be approved by the
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 7
watershed district. Boston Scientific works with multiple agencies to assure the health and safety
of employees and residents.
Ms. Thompson added that they have very strict handling procedures in place for lithium, from
delivery to manufacturing and waste. The safety processes will extend to the proposed addition.
Councilmember Scott expressed concern about the handling of larger quantities of lithium in the
manufacturing process.
Mr. Hjel said safety measures are in place for managing, controlling and safely handling lithium.
Councilmember Holden said she wasn’t concerned about anything happening with chemicals but
she would like to have the noise study explained more clearly.
Ms. Lancaster explained that VOC, hazardous pollutants, lead, and carbon monoxide, nitrogen
oxide and sulfur dioxide are all part of the permit they have to comply with. They are currently 30
tons under the limit of 50 tons.
City Administrator Perrault said he had a conversation with a resident that pointed out a couple
of items and he said he would bring them forward. The concerns were: once the project is
complete how will they make sure the noise level is acceptable, is it correct that a follow up study
will be done? And there will be a point person identified for resident concerns?
Mr. Hjel replied both were correct.
Mr. Hjel responded to the second question on the resident letter regarding height and visual
pollution. The proposed plan has a penthouse to hold the HVAC system, and with that they
exceed the height limit by five feet. As per the Master Planned Unit Development Agreement
(PUD), they are granted the option to exceed the height, in this case it is partially to mitigate the
noise from the equipment and to have redundant building style. They are also planning to do
extensive restoration and landscaping.
Mayor Grant said the PUD does give them the right to make requests, but the City can make
certain demands as well.
Councilmember Holden clarified that the building is 35’ but if the penthouse with screening
brings it up to 40’ it is allowed.
Mayor Grant reminded Councilmembers they have a special meeting after the work session to
vote on the Boston Scientific JCF Resolution. He thanked Boston Scientific for their presentation
and addressing resident concerns, and requested when they determine the liaison person they let
staff know contact information.
C. 2022 PMP Arden Oaks Street Improvements Feasibility Report
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said staff is preparing a resolution ordering a
feasibility study for the Arden Oaks Street Improvements for consideration by the City Council on
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 8
March 22. He will provide a general description of the preliminary scope, budget and schedule
for the project.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated the project was identified in the 2021-2025
CIP and consists of Arden Oaks Drive and Arden Oaks Court with approximately 40 single family
homes. The area was developed in 1982, there was a mill and overlay done in 1996 and seal
coating in 2000 and 2012. The typical life cycle of a road since a structural type project like the
mill and overlay is 20-25 years, which puts this pavement at the end of its life. Current pavement
condition rating is 31 out of a possible score of 100. Core samples showed signs of deterioration.
The sanitary sewer that was installed in 1982 was PVC and through televising reports is showing
up in good condition. The water main was also installed in 1982 and is a 6-inch ductile iron pipe
and this area shows no history of main breaks, so there is no need for any water rehab along with
this project. Inspections were recently done to the storm structures, they are in bad shape and
need repair. The storm sewer pipe still needs to be televised to know the condition. Curb and
gutter is in generally good condition except for southern curb line along Arden Oaks Drive off
Snelling Ave to the cul-de-sac which has a noticeable sag, indicating poor subsurface drainage or
in need of soil correction.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained that staff determined that a full depth
reconstruction of Arden Oaks Drive from Snelling east 400’ including the cul-de-sac will need to
be done. The ductile iron pipe and sanitary sewer can remain in place. The rest of Arden Oaks
Drive would be a full depth reclamation, replaced with 4” bituminous pavement mat. Arden Oaks
Circle would receive the same.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said the preliminary project budget is $542,340
which comes under the CIP budget of $827,000. Some of the CIP budget included a few
segments of road that were included but were rehabbed in 2020 so they have since been removed
from the project. The area has the potential for special assessments that will be laid out in the
feasibility report. The preliminary project schedule has the feasibility study ordered next week
after the Council meeting, design starting in June, have the plans accepted by the end of the year
and bidding in February, 2022.
Councilmember Holmes was concerned about two projects being done in 2022.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen responded that the scheduling of the Old Snelling
round-a-bout changed the timing of several City pavement projects. Moving the Old Snelling
updates to coincide with the larger Ramsey County project gives an opportunity to redo the Arden
Oaks neighborhood. It’s being designed as a separate project but they will want to put it at the
same bidding season in an effort to get competitive bids.
City Administrator Perrault said this project was included in last year’s approved CIP.
Councilmember Holden felt the street is in terrible shape. Leftover Old Snelling money could
be used to fund this project.
Mayor Grant said there have been some major patches put in place to hold the street together and
it’s his understanding the project is moving forward because it needs to.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 9
Councilmember Holmes requested budget information from staff.
Councilmember Scott said residents are getting frustrated with street maintenance projects
getting deferred and he favored a more aggressive street maintenance plan.
Councilmember Holden agreed that budget information is needed.
Mayor Grant felt they should move forward with the feasibility report.
Councilmember McClung was in favor of getting CIP budget information and also moving
forward with a feasibility report. He complimented Interim Public Works Director Swearingen’s
memo.
Councilmember Scott felt they should move forward with the feasibility report.
Councilmember Holden was OK with doing the feasibility report.
Mayor Grant instructed staff to move forward with the feasibility report RFP and bring it
forward to the next Council meeting.
D. Preliminary Public Works 2021 Capital Equipment Discussion
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated that staff is asking for City Council direction
is requested regarding the purchase of 2021 capital equipment items identified in the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP). With direction from Council, staff will gather updated quotes on
equipment desired. The 2021 CIP includes eight equipment items for replacement or addition,
consisting of two pickup trucks, a plow truck, three mowers and two pieces of safety equipment.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained the first piece of equipment is Unit 210
is a 2010 Ford F350 Pickup Truck equipped with a lift gate and sign-board. The sign board is an
older model and replacements parts are no longer available. Unit 210 is used primarily for traffic
control during field operations and applying ice control brine on roadways in the winter months.
This vehicle has reached the end of its useful life and can be replaced with equipment that is more
versatile. The vehicle has 61,321 miles. Staff recommends replacement of Unit 210 with a Ford
F-350, outfitted with an aluminum Tommy Gate Liftgate and an 8-foot v-plow. The truck will
fulfill the duties of park maintenance and winter plowing of sidewalks, trails and parking lots.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said Unit 203 is another pickup truck. It is
primarily used as a service vehicle for utility locating and maintenance in the summer months and
for plowing sidewalks, trails, and parking lots in the winter. Purchasing of the equipment was
halted due to Unit 210 not being approved to replace. Both Unit 203 and 210 must be approved in
order to assemble the fleet as needed for trail plowing and safe storage for parts and tools. This
unit has 97,196 miles. Staff recommends replacement of Unit 203 with a Ford F-250, outfitted
with a Knapheide Flip-Top Service Body which would hold tools more safely than they are now,
while abiding by the latest OSHA safety standards for storing loose objects. Plowing functions
would transfer to Unit 210.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 10
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen reported the next piece of equipment is the
International Plow Truck, Unit 120. In January 2020, this vehicle encountered engine problems
during a snow plowing event which triggered early replacement of the truck. Council approved
replacement last year but COVID caused delays in many industries, and the City was not able to
obtain the equipment in 2020 so the replacement of this unit has been carried over to 2021.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said next is the replacement of the 1997 Toro
Groundsmaster, Unit 409. Unit 409 is used for trail and off-road mowing including climbing steep
hills. It has 2,929 hours of operation and parts are becoming difficult to find. The CIP includes a
budget of $60,000 for this equipment in 2021. Looking at preliminary quotes, replacement of this
equipment will be well under budget.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said the Toro “Z” mowers are in the trade in
program, currently trading in on a three year cycle. Unit 458 has 597 hours, Unit 459 has 673
hours. Staff recommends continuing replacement of these machines every 3 years to minimize
down time costs and maximize trade in value.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated the next piece of equipment is the portable
message board. The mounted message board on unit 210 has become obsolete and almost
unusable. A trailer mounted unit would be more versatile and safer. The CIP includes a budget of
$16,000 for this equipment, based off of a quote received last year.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said the last piece is a portable light tower. Public
Works staff is currently working in dark conditions loading and unloading trucks during after hour
emergencies. The equipment follows OSHA safe work space compliance. The CIP includes a
budget of $10,000 for this equipment.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained the Capital Improvement Program for
equipment purchases was restructured in 2020 to allow for early replacement of the snow plow
Unit 210. Attachment A provides the annual and total five-year financial impact for the current
CIP. Staff requests direction from the City Council regarding gathering current quotes to move
forward with purchasing the presented equipment. He would also like to move forward with a
fleet management program.
Mayor Grant asked where they proposed to store the portable light tower.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen felt there was space inside the building or the back
lot but would defer to the Public Works Superintendent for his plan.
Councilmember Scott was in favor of moving forward with all items as presented.
Councilmember Holden said she won’t approve these unless there is a fleet management plan.
Mayor Grant asked about Unit 120 maintenance.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said the repairs were being done to get the vehicle
through the summer.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 11
Councilmember McClung said everything looked good to him.
City Administrator Perrault asked if the Council’s expectation were that the fleet management
plan would be completed prior to moving forward with the items?
Mayor Grant said he’d like to see some progress.
Councilmember Holden thought they’d agreed that one would be put together and they would try
to get the plan implemented by fall, that they would have an idea of how they would approach it.
City Administrator Perrault said they’d like to have a fully formed plan by the end of the year.
They would be ready to move the CIP items but the plan wouldn’t be ready for the next meeting.
Mayor Grant would like to see something tangible and suggested the fleet management plan be
put on the Council Tracker.
City Administrator Perrault clarified that items will be moved forward to the Council for
approval at an upcoming meeting and they will add the fleet maintenance plan to the Council
tracker, with a preliminary plan by fall and a more finalized plan toward the end of the year.
Councilmember Scott called a point of order to extend the meeting for another 20 minutes.
Council voted and approved.
E. Solicitors, Park Shelter/Pavilion Rentals, and Garage Sales Discussion
Mayor Grant wanted to allow all items.
Councilmember Holden felt door to door solicitation should not be allowed until the end of
June.
Mayor Grant agreed.
Councilmember Holmes disagreed, saying you didn’t have to answer your door to solicitors.
Councilmember McClung suggested July 1 for solicitors.
Councilmember Scott was fine with July 1 for solicitors.
Mayor Grant directed staff to open park shelters, pavilion rentals and garage sales, but to hold
off on soliciting until July 1.
City Administrator Perrault noted that he will bring a COVID operations update discussion to
the work session in April.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 12
F. Council Participation in City Planner Interviews
City Administrator Perrault stated the City Council previously authorized recruitment for the
City Planner position but who would be participating in the interview process was not finalized.
Staff understanding is that Council participation would be in the second/final round of interviews.
Councilmember McClung said he would take himself out of consideration.
Councilmember Scott felt it should be the Personnel Committee members.
Councilmember Holmes would like to be in the interviews as she is on the Personnel Committee
and is the liaison to the Planning Commission; however, she is not available on Wednesdays or
Fridays .
Councilmember Holden had no bad dates and could attend.
Mayor Grant suggested that Councilmember Holden attend the interviews, and either
Councilmember Holmes or himself, depending on scheduling.
City Administrator Perrault said the second/final round will most likely be done in person,
socially distanced with masks on.
G. Council Tracker
Councilmember Holden asked to make sure two items were added to the tracker: fleet
management, and talking to Ramsey County about adding a sidewalk from Red Fox onto
Lexington Avenue to the bus stop.
2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES
Mayor Grant said there is a catch basin in one of the cul-de-sacs off of Chatham that was caught
with a snow plow and needs repair.
Councilmember Holden noted the League of Minnesota Cities was holding a meeting to discuss
the new COVID money if anyone wanted to register.
ADJOURN
Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 8:16 p.m.
__________________________ __________________________
Jolene Trauba David Grant
Deputy City Clerk Mayor
Approved: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 15, 2021
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the Special City
Council meeting at 8:19 p.m.
Note: On March 20th, the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate in
City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021
Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave
McClung and Steve Scott
Absent: None
Also present : City Administrator Dave Perrault, Inter im Public Works Director David
Swearingen, and Deputy City Clerk J olene Trauba
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Resolution 2021-014 Regarding Support of Job Creation Fund Application in Connection
with Boston Scientific Corporation
MOTION : Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve
Resolution 2021-014 Regarding Support of Job Creation Fund Application in
Connection with Boston Scientific Corporation. A roll call vote was taken. The
motion carried (5-0).
ADJOURN
MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. A
roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mayor Grant adjourned the Special Cit y Council Meeting at 8:20 p.m.
__________________________ __________________________
Jolene Trauba David Grant
Deputy City Clerk Mayor
Approved: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MARCH 22, 2021
5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the Special City
Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m.
Note: On March 20th, the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate
in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021
Present via telephone: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran
Holmes, Dave McClung and Steve Scott
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Interim Public Works Director David
Swearingen; and City Clerk Julie Hanson
Also present via telephone: Bolton & Menk Planning Consultants Jane Kansier and
Corrin Bemis; Grove Community Church Pastors Josh Krehbiel and Katie Krehbiel;
Property broker Cameron Peterson; Consultant Tom Goodrum; Church building
committee members Paul Spakousky and Spencer Hutton; Church board member Mark
Herringshaw; Architect Thomas Small; and City Attorney Joel Jamnik
1. AGENDA ITEMS
A. Concept Plan Review at 1275 Red Fox Road – Grove Community Church
Planning Consultant Kansier explained that this is different from a typical Concept Plan
Review. The uses being proposed are not permitted in the District, it is zoned I-Flex District. If
the Concept Plan should move forward, it will require an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to
allow the uses to be permitted in that District.
Councilmember Holden asked if there would be any change to the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning Consultant Kansier replied there would not be.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 2
Mayor Grant asked if the development could be done by way of Conditional Use Permit.
Planning Consultant Kansier responded that was possible and part of the direction the Council
would need to give staff. She said it could be a Conditional Use Permit or possibly a Planned
Unit Development, either way an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is required.
Grove Community Church Pastor Josh Krehbiel introduced property broker Cameron
Peterson, consultant Tom Goodrum, building committee members Paul Spakousky and Spencer
Hutton, board member Mark Herringshaw and architect Thomas Small.
Grove Community Church Pastor Katie Krehbiel gave background information about herself
and her family. She explained they met while attending Northwestern University and started the
church in their home near Lake Johanna in 2013, they began meeting in the evening at a church in
St. Anthony Village in 2015, and started searching for a building in 2018. When they move into
their own church space they will change the name to Everyday Church. Pre-COVID they had
about 700 adults and 150 children attend services. They have more than 125 zip codes
represented which includes young professionals, young families and college students.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said they have a passion to empower everyday people, and they believe the
key to healthy communities is healthy hearts, relationships and homes.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel gave a summary of the project. They are proposing to use approximately
75,000 square feet that would include a 900-seat auditorium, 400 parking stalls, large format
classrooms, 30,000 leasable square feet on the second floor, a daycare center, and counseling
center.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel addressed zoning of the property. He said the daycare, classrooms,
counseling uses are permitted or conditional uses in the district. The I-Flex district is adjacent to
the B3/B4 districts which allows houses of worship as a conditional use. Primary programming
will occur during non-peak business hours so traffic impact will have less of a strain on traffic in
the area than previous businesses in the location. He explained the first and second floor site
plans and the benefits to the community, including improving a vacant property and the economic
impact of having a church community.
Councilmember Holden asked if the applicant was aware of International Paper working 24/7
with noise and semi-trucks.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel responded that as they have walked the property it hasn’t been a concern.
The daycare would be under 25 children and would be on the back (north) side of the building.
He also said that even as they draw attention to young professionals, those attending their services
come from all different demographics and socio-economic conditions. They would be asking for
long term 5 year or more leases for the second floor.
Councilmember Holden felt they should add a sidewalk along their property and asked if they
were going to be changing the lighting on the property.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said they are talking about increasing lighting in the parking lot. There is
room to add a sidewalk next to Red Fox Road.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 3
Mayor Grant asked if the counseling center would be internal to the church, what does it mean to
have master classes, and asked for more information about the daycare.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel replied the counseling would be for both church members and others. A
master class is training by experts in their fields within the church for other members of the
church. There is not a current established Montessori daycare that they would transition over to
the new space, it is a concept plan that could serve the church community and beyond.
Mayor Grant asked if they had people looking to lease the second floor.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said they have some leaders in their community that have expressed
interest in renting space. He noted the current church building they are leasing is approximately
20,000 square feet. This building would give them about 40,000 square feet on the first floor.
Councilmember Scott expressed curiosity regarding their ability to undertake such a large
project.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel responded that they have a very generous community, and only lost about
ten percent in giving in 2020. They are actually stronger than they have ever been financially
now.
Councilmember Holmes asked if the sanctuary area was two story, as it looks like there are stairs
going up from that area.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said there is potential for minimal platforms but there is no second floor in
the sanctuary.
Councilmember McClung asked if they envisioned the second floor being tenants not affiliated
with the church and on the tax rolls.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel stated that in talking with Ramsey County, the tax rolls will include the
rental space on the second floor.
Councilmember Holden stated that a coffee shop isn’t a permitted use in the area and
commented that the church could take away customers from the other coffee shops in the area.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel replied that their intention would be for internal use and used to create a
space of connection and community within the church.
Mayor Grant added that it is not uncommon to have coffee shops in larger churches.
Councilmember Holden asked if there would be any variances requested.
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier said based on the current information available it doesn’t
appear there would be.
Councilmember Holden asked if the could limit the number of children in the daycare.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 4
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier said she would like the city attorney to respond to that
question. But she felt the Conditional Use Permit could limit the number of children.
Mayor Grant noted that the Fire Marshall would have to look at their plans and they may have to
make a change to the number of seats in the sanctuary in order to meet fire codes.
Councilmember Holden asked how many staff would be there on a daily basis.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel replied they currently have seven full time staff and they anticipate around
15 in the coming years.
Councilmember Holden asked if they had any intention of putting a gym in the building.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said it could be a potential use for space on the second floor, but they
anticipated it being small space utilized by the second floor tenants.
Pastor Katie Krehbiel added it wasn’t part of the current plan.
City Administrator Perrault asked what the different avenues are to move forward.
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier responded the first step would be to amend the ordinance to
allow this use in the I-Flex District, keeping in mind that it wouldn’t be exclusive to this property.
After that is done, they would look at how this proposal fits into the new ordinance requirements.
For example, if they need a Conditional Use Permit, they would have to make application for that
and go through the public hearing process.
City Administrator Perrault said staff would want the City Council to weigh in on how the
zoning ordinance is changed first, and then address the planning application after that.
Mayor Grant said he would see it as a Conditional Use Permit so it is only changed for the site
and not permitted throughout the entire District.
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier clarified that the Zoning Ordinance has to be amended to
allow it in some way; either permitted outright, a Conditional Use Permit, or a Planned Unit
Development.
Councilmember Holden asked if the coffee shop and daycare would be automatically approved if
it’s not a Conditional Use Permit.
Planning Consultant Jane Kansier responded that the zoning ordinance currently lists
specifically what is permitted in the district. If they decide the church is permitted, they don’t
necessarily have to allow the accessory uses.
City Attorney Jamnik cautioned that the traditional accessory uses for houses of worship have to
be allowed. Food shelves, fellowship, shelters would normally be considered as uses. A
commercial coffee shop wouldn’t normally fit into that category but a coffee station for fellowship
before and after service in a social situation would be a traditional accessory usage. He didn’t feel
making it a permitted use was how most communities deal with houses of worship because you
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 5
want to look at traffic and parking, and having it as a permitted use doesn’t allow you to do
enough of a case by case analysis. But he also recommended against going as a Planned Unit
Development because most are a single site and usually a PUD at a single site is a number of
deviations from city standards with nothing in return or exchange that is a betterment for the
community. Consequently, he thought it should be a Conditional Use Permit with standards and
conditions that are detailed.
Councilmember Scott said he agreed with the Conditional Use Permit. He would also like to get
community feedback.
City Attorney Jamnik explained the rezoning would require a hearing before the Planning
Commission and action by the City Council in advance of the application of the Conditional Use
Permit.
Councilmember Scott felt it was an industrial area with heavy truck traffic and that concerns
him.
Mayor Grant noted that getting on and off of Lexington Avenue is another concern, although
they could go down Dunlap if they were going south. He recommended the applicant spend time
in the area on several Sundays to see what the traffic from the other businesses is like.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said there is a staggering of when people leave, they have found that
leaving after services often times extends up to 30 minutes.
Councilmember Scott asked if they would be having classes or services on Wednesdays.
Pastor Katie Krehbiel replied they would continue to have two services on Sundays and classes
on Wednesday nights.
Mayor Grant asked if the Council was comfortable allowing the church as a Conditional Use
Permit.
Councilmember Scott said tentatively yes.
Councilmember McClung said he had concerns regarding truck traffic from International Paper
and some of the applicant’s plans such as the coffee shop – his opinion was that the City shouldn’t
initiate a zoning amendment, but the applicant should make that request.
Councilmember Holmes agreed that the applicant should work with Planning to request the
zoning change and follow up with the Conditional Use Permit. She is also concerned about the
commercial aspects.
Councilmember Holden wondered if the applicant was looking anywhere else.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel replied they are not looking anywhere else and would like to move forward
with this building. They are in negotiations with the seller at this time.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 6
Councilmember Holden said according to the City Attorney they don’t have a lot of leeway so
she was fine with it, but she had the same concerns as previously expressed.
Mayor Grant also felt he Conditional Use Permit was appropriate and had concerns with
International Paper.
Pastor Josh Krehbiel said they aren’t attached to the idea of a gym and moving forward they
would gladly cancel that out of future plans.
2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
None
ADJOURN
Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 6:50 p.m.
__________________________ __________________________
Julie Hanson David Grant
City Clerk Mayor
Approved: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 22, 2021
7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City
Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Note: On March 20, 2020 the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to
participate in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021
Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave
McClung and Steve Scott
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Interim Public Works Director David
Swearingen; and City Clerk Julie Hanson; via telephone Steve Schneider, St. Paul
Regional Water Services
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. A roll call vote was
taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
None.
3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES
None.
4. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
A. St. Paul Regional Water Services Presentation
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 22, 2021 2
Steve Schneider, St. Paul Regional Water Services, thanked the Council for its time. He
discussed the new McCarrons Water Treatment Plant, noting this was where all water was treated.
He explained this treatment plant was constructed in the mid-1910’s and additions were
completed in the 1930’s and 1950’s. He reported much of the infrastructure was nearly 100 years
old and still produces excellent water quality. He stated in 2014 the Board of Water Commission
requested an asset inventory and a 30 year CIP. He explained this led to plans for the
rehabilitation and replacement of the McCarrons Water Treatment Plant. He discussed how the
project would improve capacity to handle containment of emerging concerns, along with
improving reliability while also reducing the footprint of the plant. Further discussion ensued
regarding the preliminary scope for the water treatment plant project along with the public
outreach that would be completed. He commented on how the plant improvements would impact
residential and wholesale water rates. It was noted there would not be a disruption in water
services throughout the entirety of this project.
Councilmember Holden questioned why St. Paul had not considered using bonds to finance this
project. She requested further information on how the water rates would increase after completion
of the new water treatment plant.
Mr. Schneider explained the financing for the project would be subsidized by the Environmental
Protection Agency and would come at an interest rate of 1%. He discussed how the rates would be
impacted by the new water treatment plant.
Councilmember Scott stated he has lived all over the country and parts of the world where water
quality was an issue. He indicated he appreciated the access he had to high quality drinking water.
He questioned if the treatment with ozone would reduce the level of chloramines in the water.
Mr. Schneider described how the ozonation would improve the water quality by breaking down
the carbon particles in the water and would also reduce the chlorination in the water. He noted the
water taste would not change. He further discussed the security that would be in place to protect
the water treatment system.
Councilmember Holmes explained she toured the facility off of Rice Street and stated it was
fascinating. She commented further on the proposed rate increase for water customers.
Mr. Schneider discussed the estimated water rates that would be in place after the new water
treatment plant was completed.
Mayor Grant thanked Mr. Schneider for his presentation to the City Council.
5. STAFF COMMENTS
A. COVID-19 Update
City Administrator Perrault provided the Council with an update on how the City was
responding to COVID-19. He encouraged residents to visit the City’s website for the most current
and up to date information regarding COVID-19. He reported the Minnesota Department of
Health and CDC also had websites with current guidelines and recommendations. He explained
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 22, 2021 3
the City of Arden Hills remains in a peacetime state of emergency and City Hall will remain
closed until further notice. He indicated City staff remains operational and can be reached via
phone or email. He encouraged all residents to monitor the State’s rollout of the COVID-19
vaccine as eligibility requirements can change. He stated another round of federal stimulus has
been approved and further information will be brought to the Council regarding this funding at a
future meeting.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. March 8, 2021, Special City Council Executive Session (Closed)
B. March 8, 2021, Regular City Council
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to approve the March 8, 2021, Special City Council Executive Session
(Closed) meeting minutes; and March 8, 2021, Regular City Council meeting
minutes as amended. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll
B. Motion to Approve City Administrator Three-Year Performance Evaluation
C. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-015 Recommending the City of Coon Rapids
Award the 2021 Street Maintenance Program
D. Motion to Approve Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services with
Braun Intertec – 2021 PMP Street & Utility Improvements
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize
execution of all necessary documents contained therein. A roll call vote was
taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
8. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
None.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities
City Administrator Perrault stated water customers whose accounts are 90 days past due were
informed that the City intends to certify delinquent charges to Ramsey County to be collected with
property taxes. These customers have the right to a hearing in front of the City Council to discuss
this matter prior to certification.
Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 22, 2021 4
With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m.
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution 2021-016, Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special
Assessments for Delinquent Utilities
City Administrator Perrault stated delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County
quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated
February 12, 2021 were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and
were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by March 12, 2021. Utility accounts with
an unpaid delinquent balance would be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property taxes
payable in 2022. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an eight
percent penalty. The City will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against
the respective properties.
Councilmember Scott discussed a comment he received from an Arden Hills resident.
City Administrator Perrault explained this individual was not on this list and and the resident
may address the Council with their concerns at a future meeting.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to adopt Resolution 2021-016 – Adopting and Confirming Quarterly
Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities. A roll call vote was taken. The
motion carried (5-0).
B. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Preparation of a Feasibility Report – Arden
Oaks Street Improvements Project
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated the 2021-2025 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) identifies proposed street and utility improvements within the Arden Oaks area for
2022. The value shown in the above budgeted amount included Eide Circle, Indian Circle and
Indian Place. Those streets were rehabilitated in 2020 as part of the Public Works In-house paving
project so they have been removed. The proposed area now consists of Arden Oaks Drive and
Arden Oaks Court which includes approximately 40 single family homes and is generally referred
to as the Arden Oaks Neighborhood.
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained the City Council work session on March
15, 2021 included discussion of the anticipated scope of work, schedule and an initial estimate of
costs for potential improvements within the project area. Based on this discussion, the feasibility
study will include an evaluation of potential improvements to streets and storm sewers. The study
will review alternatives for street and drainage designs to determine the extent that the cost of
street improvements, and the associated special assessments, can be reduced based on existing soil
conditions and drainage needs within the residential neighborhood. Staff commented further on
the scope of the work and recommended approval of the request for RFP’s.
Councilmember Holden asked if the City had to request RFP’s for this project.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 22, 2021 5
Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated staff would prefer this project to go out to
RFP given its size.
Councilmember Holmes thanked staff for the additional information provided for this project.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a
motion to Authorizing Request for Proposals for the preparation of a
feasibility report of the Arden Oaks Street Improvements project. A roll call
vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0).
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Holmes stated she appreciated the presentation from Mr. Schneider on the new
St. Paul water treatment plan.
Councilmember Holden asked how the City handles severely wounded deer in residential yards.
City Administrator Perrault explained Ramsey County handles animal control for the City. He
noted it is animal control’s policy that if the animal flees they let it be, otherwise they will deal
with living animals that are injured or otherwise unable to move.
ADJOURN
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to
adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:56 p.m.
__________________________ __________________________
Julie Hanson David Grant
City Clerk Mayor
CONSENT ITEM 6A
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst
SUBJECT:
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
A. Approve Claims and Payroll
or
B. Reject Claims and Payroll
Background
Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly.
Budget Impact
NA
Attachments
2021 Payroll #7 ……………………………………………………………. $99,755.25
Total Payroll $99,755.25
Paid Claims--- 03/13/2021 through 04/02/2021
(Check Nos. 49968-49989 and ACH Checks) ……………………………... $56,617.09
Total Accounts Payable $56,617.09
Total Claims $156,372.34
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
PAYROLL # 7
CHECKS DATED:04/02/21
Biweekly:03/13/21 -03/26/21
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method
FIT 6,532.05 EFT
SIT 2,783.60 EFT
FICA Oasdi 4,167.21 EFT
FICA Medicare 974.62 EFT
TOTAL TAXES 14,457.48
Health Premium 1,368.38 A/P Check*
Dental Premium 193.02 A/P Check*
FSA Health Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check*
FSA Dependent Care Reimb.0.00 A/P Check*
TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1,561.40
HSA Health Saving 498.33
Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 0.00 EFT
Health Care Savings Plan-2% 428.33 EFT
Health Care Savings Plan-4%486.58 EFT
TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,413.24
PERA 4,074.49 EFT
ICMA 2,515.45 EFT
Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check*
MN State Retirement System 750.00 EFT
TOTAL RETIREMENT 7,954.34
IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check*
LTD/STD Insurance 1,096.56 A/P Check*
PERA Life Insurance 32.00 A/P Check*
Life/Addl/Dep Life 77.24 A/P Check*
Life/Addl non-tax 26.10 A/P Check*
UNUM 19.51 A/P Check*
AFLAC 22.76 EFT
TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,414.17
Total Employee Deductions 26,800.63
Net Payroll 0.00
Direct Deposit 43,345.68 EFT
Gross Payroll Tie-Out 70,236.31
Plus City Paid Benefit 29,518.94
TOTAL PAYROLL COST 99,755.25
FICA TIE-OUT
Gross Payroll 70,236.31
Less Total FSA 1,561.40
Less Total H.SA 1,413.24
Less Voluntary Ins 48.86
Net P/R Subject to FICA 67,212.81
FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,167.21
FICA Medicare @ 1.45%974.62
Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax
Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date.
* A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report.
Checks may be paid this week or the following week.
90.30
90.30
1,250.00
4,701.33
484.16
5,185.49
17,851.32
1,250.00
5,141.83
17,361.82
489.50
CITY BENEFIT
4,167.21
974.62
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
Pang.Silseth
4/6/2021 3:23 PM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 03/19/2021ACH
PR 21-06 PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 354.90
PR 21-06 PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 409.50
764.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382:
0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 03/19/2021ACH
PR 21-06 PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 241.27
PR 21-06 PR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.03.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,811.54
2,052.81Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387:
6077 CIVICPLUS 03/19/2021ACH
209026 CivicHR Subcription 3/2021-3/2022 911.63
911.63Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6077:
8029 MMKR & CORP PA 03/19/2021ACH
49757 2020 Audit Services 1,088.00
49757 2020 Audit Services 1,088.00
49757 2020 Audit Services 1,088.00
49757 2020 Audit Services 1,088.00
49757 2020 Audit Services 570.00
49757 2020 Audit Services 1,228.00
6,150.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8029:
ALPI ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 03/19/2021ACH
162557 March Newsletter 1,824.60
162589 Business Cards 130.54
1,955.14Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI:
GRANTD DAVID GRANT 03/19/2021ACH
3162021 Mileage Reimbursement 22.18
22.18Total for this ACH Check for Vendor GRANTD:
10244 COMCAST BUSINESS INC 03/19/202149968
118450615 Service 3/1-3/31 496.66
496.66Total for Check Number 49968:
10218 HR GREEN INC 03/19/202149969
141936 SWPPP-February 380.00
380.00Total for Check Number 49969:
1450 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INC TRUST (SP)03/19/202149970
2021-01REST LMC Claim 11053070 Restitution 1,053.74
Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
1,053.74Total for Check Number 49970:
0155 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES 03/19/202149971
W21020585 February Phones 736.14
736.14Total for Check Number 49971:
1054 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 03/19/202149972
B13128465 MS Office Software License 268.00
268.00Total for Check Number 49972:
SRFC SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 03/19/202149973
14320.00-1 MVHS Trail Improv.-February 1,043.38
1,043.38Total for Check Number 49973:
9755 VERIZON CONNECT 03/19/202149974
OSV000002379391 February Service 323.80
323.80Total for Check Number 49974:
16,157.88Total for 3/19/2021:
0192 GRAINGER INC 03/26/2021ACH
9828938358 Supplies 20.86
9833290548 Supplies 16.94
9838120252 Supplies 40.27
78.07Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192:
0292 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC 03/26/2021ACH
3487769 February Rental 24.64
24.64Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292:
0750 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/26/2021ACH
9875238675 Service 3/11-4/10 1,003.66
1,003.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750:
10343 TIM BEEBE 03/26/2021ACH
3252021 Mileage Reimbursesment 464.80
464.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10343:
10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 03/26/2021ACH
M1239 March CC Minutes 187.00
187.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363:
1115 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/26/2021ACH
R-017451-000-2 ESRI Cloud-EA Migration-February 1,356.00
1,356.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1115:
1252 CAMPBELL KNUTSON - ATTORNEYS AT LAW03/26/2021ACH
3231G-0221 February Legal Services 170.50
3231G-0221 February Legal Services 1,513.72
3231G-0221 February Legal-LOL Abatement 155.00
Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
3231G-0221 February Legal Services 527.00
3231G-0221 February Legal Services 46.50
3231G-0221 February Legal Services 1,245.00
3231G-0221 February Legal -PC 20-022 #549 269.00
3,926.72Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1252:
1363 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 03/26/2021ACH
11233 Leak Locate - 2010 Thom Dr 313.20
313.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1363:
4445 PIONEER RIM AND WHEEL CO 03/26/2021ACH
01CC4906 Supplies 76.82
76.82Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4445:
5383 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 03/26/2021ACH
FP180490 Parts for Equip #85203 71.52
71.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5383:
5518 KORTERRA INC 03/26/2021ACH
20803 Annual Service Fee 1/30-21-1/29/22 1,600.00
1,600.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5518:
5548 FINANCE & COMMERCE INC 03/26/2021ACH
744993768 Karth Lake Runoff Bid 162.40
162.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5548:
5587 CES IMAGING INC 03/26/2021ACH
INV125062 March Rental 60.00
60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587:
6060 BATTERIES PLUS 03/26/2021ACH
P37920873 Batteries-CR E2 Speed Signs 583.60
583.60Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6060:
8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 03/26/2021ACH
1221-4366 February Water Survey 761.25
761.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032:
8870 CHET'S SHOES INC 03/26/2021ACH
50502 Clothing Allowance- SB Boots 175.00
175.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8870:
FPTC FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY INC 03/26/2021ACH
25928 Supplies 679.45
679.45Total for this ACH Check for Vendor FPTC:
0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 03/26/202149975
411931 Supplies 57.78
412173 Supplies 17.98
413834 Supplies 22.28
Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
98.04Total for Check Number 49975:
1033 COMCAST 03/26/202149976
44271.0421 Service 3/21-4/20 6.57
6.57Total for Check Number 49976:
UB*00464 Dior Consulting LLC 03/26/202149977
Refund Check 012487-000, 1870 Glenpaul Avenue 43.82
43.82Total for Check Number 49977:
1193 FURTHER INC 03/26/202149978
15630951 March Participant Fees 45.00
45.00Total for Check Number 49978:
10403 INDIA PALACE UPTOWN 03/26/202149979
6032020 Liquor License Refund COVID19 211.55
211.55Total for Check Number 49979:
5443 METRO PRODUCTS INC 03/26/202149980
158065 Supplies 85.63
85.63Total for Check Number 49980:
0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 03/26/202149981
315800042021 April Insurance 64.00
64.00Total for Check Number 49981:
1074 PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE INC 03/26/202149982
82679 Tree Removal-1175 Edgewater Ave 3,200.00
3,200.00Total for Check Number 49982:
0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 03/26/202149983
FLEET-000627 Feb Equip Service & Parts 775.51
FLEET-000627 Feb Equip Service & Parts 3,060.00
PUBW-019069 Signal Repair-Lex Ave/CTY Rd E 381.66
4,217.17Total for Check Number 49983:
10387 SKI DEN SPORTS INC 03/26/202149984
70209 Clothing Allowance-TB 41.05
41.05Total for Check Number 49984:
1161 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 03/26/202149985
29219 Water Main Repair-1230 Hwy 96 7,790.90
7,790.90Total for Check Number 49985:
27,327.86Total for 3/26/2021:
0327 STAPLES INC 04/02/2021ACH
3470084339 Supplies-Return -184.41
3471379309 Supplies 23.29
3471379310 Supplies 26.73
Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
3471449460 Supplies 0.49
3471449461 Supplies 80.47
3471449461 Supplies 16.77
3472335033 Supplies 245.27
3472335034 Supplies 9.58
218.19Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327:
0329 MICHAEL CHRISTOFORE 04/02/2021ACH
3302021 Mileage Reimbursement 487.20
487.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0329:
0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 04/02/2021ACH
PR 21-07 PR Batch 00100.04.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 419.61
PR 21-07 PR Batch 00100.04.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 484.16
903.77Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382:
0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 04/02/2021ACH
PR 21-07 PR Batch 00100.04.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 284.30
PR 21-07 PR Batch 00100.04.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,811.54
2,095.84Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387:
0922 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION04/02/2021ACH
2021-028 Production Services-February 967.35
967.35Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922:
10433 STEVEN BAAR 04/02/2021ACH
3302021 Mileage Reimbursement 544.32
544.32Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10433:
1115 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/02/2021ACH
R-017667-000-1 Traffic Studies-February 513.00
513.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1115:
5493 JOLENE TRAUBA 04/02/2021ACH
3262021 Mileage Reimbursement 63.60
63.60Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5493:
7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 04/02/2021ACH
1094795 Restrooms 3/20-4/16 344.00
1099534 Restrooms 3/26/4/16 200.11
544.11Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025:
CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 04/02/202149986
184503.0321 March Pension 1,228.80
1,228.80Total for Check Number 49986:
5138 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 04/02/202149987
108803 CLAIM #: LMC CA 000000108803 1,509.33
1,509.33Total for Check Number 49987:
6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 04/02/202149988
GL154938.0421 April Insurance 1,393.54
Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
1,393.54Total for Check Number 49988:
AR-SUMM SUMMIT DESIGN-BUILD LLC 04/02/202149989
GE 2019-00462 Escrow Refund GE 2019-00462, 1483 Bussard Ct 2,662.30
2,662.30Total for Check Number 49989:
13,131.35Total for 4/2/2021:
Report Total (54 checks): 56,617.09
Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/6/2021 3:23 PM)
Page 1
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Authorize City Administrator to Enter into a Closest Unit Agreement with
Vadnais Heights Fire Department
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Authorize the City Administrator to send a letter to the Lake Johanna Fire Department to enter
into a Closest Unit Agreement with the Vadnais Heights Fire Department.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Discussion
The Vadnais Heights Fire Department is interested in entering into a Closest Unit Agreement with
surrounding cities. The below summary was provided by Chief Boehlke:
The City of Vadnais Heights has decided they would like to join the “Closest Unit Dispatching”
agreement with surrounding Cities. The City of Vadnais Heights will need a letter from Arden Hills,
Shoreview and North Oaks simply stating that you are Authorizing them to be part of the agreement
for reciprocal services. Currently the Closest Unit Dispatching is for Cardiac Arrest calls, Structure
Fires and Water Emergencies. The way this might work is that an Engine from Lake Johanna is
driving on Rice Street and in the city of Vadnais Heights, they are dispatched to a Cardiac Arrest
call. The AVL that is built in the CAD computers in the Engine sees that the Lake Johanna Engine is
closer to the Cardiac Arrest call than the Vadnais Heights unit…. The Lake Johanna Engine is
automatically added to the call along with the Vadnais Heights units. Lake Johanna has Automatic
Aid for Structure Fires with all of our neighboring departments in Ramsey County, so the Closest
unit dispatching really applies more to Cardiac Arrest calls and water emergencies.
To move this forward, City Council would need to authorize the City Administrator to send a letter to
the Lake Johanna Fire Department authorizing them to be part of the agreement. Note, we have this
agreement already established with neighboring cities in Ramsey County, Vadnais Heights is the only
remaining city. If the Council approves this item, the City Administrator will provide LJFD with the
needed notice. Attached to this memo is the Closest Unit Agreement that Vadnais Heights will be
CONSENT ITEM – 6B
MEMORANDUM
Page 2
signing for reference. We are NOT signing this document, our responsibility is a simple letter to
LJFD.
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
Attachment A: Closest Unit Agreement for Vadnais Heights Fire Department
1
MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE
AUTOMATIC DISPATCH OF THE CLOSEST EMERGENCY
RESPONSE UNIT REGARDLESS OF JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
This Mutual Aid Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of
___________________, 2021 by the City of Vadnais Heights and among Cities of Fridley, Saint
Anthony, Saint Paul, Roseville, Little Canada Fire Department Inc., Maplewood, North Saint
Paul, New Brighton, White Bear Lake, and the Lake Johanna Fire Department Inc. (collectively
the “Cities” or “Parties” and individually the “City” or the “Party”).
RECITALS
A. The Cities/Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to authorize their respective fire
departments to provide, and for the participating Cities/Parties to receive, automatic mutual
aid to dispatch the closest equipment and personnel to emergency events to provide
assistance in the form of fire, rescue, and related services;
B. The Cities/Parties are authorized under Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59 to cooperatively
exercise their commonly held powers and mutual aid agreements are critical to providing and
supporting emergency services;
C. The Cities/Parties determine that providing for the automatic dispatch of the closest
emergency unit as is authorized in this Agreement is in their best interests and they desire to
create an opportunity for other cities and towns to participate in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
In exchange for the mutual promises made herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
I. DEFINITION OF TERMS
For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the
meanings given them below.
1. “Agency” means the fire department, fire station, or fire unit called upon to provide
Assistance to an Emergency Event.
2. “Assistance” means the provision of fire personnel and equipment in response to an
Emergency Event.
3. “Dispatcher” means the person at the applicable public safety access point that
receives reports of Emergency Events and selects the appropriate Agency to respond
to and provide Assistance for the Emergency.
4. “Emergency” any request for fire department assistance.
2
5. “Emergency Events” means any Emergency incident in which an Agency may be
called upon by a Dispatcher to provide Assistance within the scope of the Agency’s
service capabilities as determined by the respective member Cities and communicated
in writing to the Emergency Communications Center.
6. “President” means the president of the Ramsey County Fire Chiefs Association.
7. “Protection Area” means the area within the Cities of Vadnais Heights, Fridley, Saint
Paul, Roseville, Little Canada, Maplewood, Saint Anthony, Falcon Heights, North
Saint Paul, North Oaks, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Lauderdale, New Brighton, and any
additional city or town that joins this Agreement as provided herein.
8. “Requesting Party” means a Party which requests assistance from another Party to
this Agreement and each such responding Party is considered a Sending Party.
9. “Sending Party” means a Party called upon to provide Assistance to another Party and
which actually provides Assistance to the Requesting Party.
10. “Specialized Activities” means the provision of non-emergency assistance including,
but not limited to, training of personnel and associated equipment and facilities.
II. AUTHORIZATION
Each of the Cities participating in this Agreement hereby authorize their respective fire
Agencies to respond to and receive automatic mutual aid services pursuant to the terms of
this Agreement and to otherwise take such actions as are needed to provide and receive
Assistance as provided herein.
III. TERM AND TERMINATION
This Agreement shall be effective as of the date first written above and shall be ongoing
until terminated as provided herein. Each City shall act by resolution to adopt this
Agreement and shall forward a fully executed copy of its resolution and a signed original
of this Agreement to the President of the Ramsey County Fire Chiefs Association.
Any Party may act by resolution to opt out of its participation in this Agreement. No
such resolution shall be effective until the Party provides at least 60 days’ written notice
of termination to the President, the applicable County Emergency Communications
Center, and each of the other Parties. The resolution must indicate the date of withdrawal
from this Agreement, which must be sufficiently in the future to allow for the 60 day
notice. The notice shall include a fully executed copy of the termination resolution.
IV. AUTOMATIC MUTUAL AID PROCEDURE
1. Whenever a Party to this Agreement receives a call for Assistance for an Emergency
Event occurring within its jurisdictional boundaries, that call will automatically be
3
dispatched to the Agency having primary jurisdiction, as well as to any Agency for
which the Dispatcher or Computer Aided Dispatch System (CAD) determines may
provide a more timely response. The Sending Party shall respond to the call and
make necessary Assistance available without undue delay. The typical response from
the Sending Party shall be one apparatus and crew.
The extent of Assistance provided by the Sending Party shall be determined solely by
the Sending Party based on its established response criteria and procedures. In the
event a Sending Party determines it will not be able to provide Assistance, the fire
official for the Agency making that determination shall immediately notify the
Requesting Party.
2. The first arriving unit shall be in command of the emergency scene, until relieved by
the Requesting Party. The Sending Party’s fire official shall retain direction and
control of the Sending Party’s fire personnel and equipment on the scene.
3. Each Party, whether it be the Requesting Party or a Sending Party, shall be
responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party shall maintain
workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage covering its own
personnel while they are providing Assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Each
Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any workers compensation benefits
paid to its own employee or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly
or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers, employees.
4. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment. Each
Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any dam ages to or loss of its
equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the
negligence of the other Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers.
5. Specialized Activities of non-emergency nature may be requested and/or provided by
both parties to the Agreement. There is no obligation on the part of a Sending Party
to provide Specialized Activities.
6. No charge shall be made to either party for Assistance rendered under this Agreement
for incidents with duration under eight (8) hours. Provided, however, that in the
event the Requesting Party is reimbursed for said personnel, equipment, or any other
costs from a party or parties responsible for the Emergency, or is otherwise
reimbursed by a third party source, then reimbursement, on a pro-rata basis, shall be
made to the Sending Party for any equipment or personnel charges.
V. COOPERATIVE IMPLEMENTATION
The Parties agree to work in good faith through their respective Agencies to
cooperatively establish any specific response criteria or procedures as they may
determine are needed to implement this Agreement. Such criteria and procedures do not
necessarily need to be the same for each Party, but they shall not be contrary to the
4
primary purpose of this Agreement. Each Party shall be responsible for communicating
in writing its response criteria and procedures to each of the other Cities, the President,
and the applicable County Emergency Communications Center.
VI. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
1. For the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 466), the employees and officers of the Sending Party are deemed to be
employees (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 466.01, subdivision 6) of the
Requesting Party. For all other purposes, all personnel remain the employees of their
respective Party during the performance of duties under this Agreement.
2. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify the Sending Party against any
claims brought or actions filed against the Sending Party or any officers, employees,
or volunteers of the Sending Party for injury to or death of any third person or
persons, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising out of the
provision of Assistance by the Sending Party under this Agreement.
Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself
and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. As provided in
Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59, subdivision 1a, for the purposes of determining
total liability the Parties shall be considered a single governmental unit and the total
liability for the Parties shall not exceed the limits on governmental liability for a
single governmental unit as specified in Minnesota Statutes, section 466.04,
subdivision 1. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as any of the Parties
waiving any exemptions or limitations on liability available to them under law.
The intent of the indemnification requirement of this section is to impose on each
Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify any Sending Party for
claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction subject to the liability limits
under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend
and indemnify is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts
among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a
single occurrence to the defended by a single attorney.
3. No Party to this Agreement, nor any officer of any Party, shall be liable to any other
Party or to any other person for failure of any Party to furnish Assistance to any other
Party, or for recalling Assistance.
VII. ADDING MEMBERS
Any other city/town/fire department corporation adjacent to the Protection Area may join
this Agreement upon the written consent of all of the existing Parties to this Agreement
that abut upon the boundaries of the joining Party, the adoption by the joining Party a
resolution authorizing execution of this Agreement, and the filing of a copy of the
5
executed resolution and this Agreement with the President. The Ramsey County Fire
Chiefs may impose reasonable conditions on the admission of additional cities and
establish procedures for removal of a Party for cause. The addition of a Party to this
Agreement as provided herein does not require an amendment to this Agreement. The
joining Party shall become subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement as of the
effective date of its participation in the sharing of services under this Agreement as
determined by the President.
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS
1. This Agreement may be amended by written agreement of the all of the Parties.
2. The Parties will execute this Agreement in any number of duplicate originals, each of
which constitutes an original, and all of which, collectively, constitute only one
Agreement. Each Party will deliver enough executed counterpart signature pages so
that all of the Parties will have a fully executed original of this Agreement. The
President will coordinate the delivery of the signature pages and compiling and
delivering originals of the Agreement to each of the Parties.
3. This Agreement is made under the law of the State of Minnesota.
4. This Agreement is entered into for the benefit of the Parties and is not intended to
provide any rights to any third parties.
5. This Agreement is not exclusive and is not intended to replace any other mutual aid
agreements any of the Parties may have in place.
IX. EXECUTION
Each Party has read, agreed to, and executed this Agreement on the date indicated below.
[signature pages follow]
6
CITY OF VADNAIS HEIGHTS
Adopted on the ____ day of ________________, 2021.
By ______________________ By _________________________
Its ______________________ Its _________________________
Page 1
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Resolution 2021-017 Supporting the City’s Application for CDBG Funding
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Resolution 2021-017 in support of the City’s application for Community Development Block
Grand funds to make site improvements to Arden Manor Park.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Discussion
Per the City Administrator, the City’s planning consultant completed an application for this year’s
CDBG funding cycle. The below information was provided to the City Council last year and is
identical to what was previously approved with the exception of a few minor updates:
Staff has submitted an application for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) to make
improvements at Arden Manor Park. CDBG funds can be used to make investments in areas that
meet Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements for affordable housing.
Most activities funded by the CDBG program are designed to benefit low and moderate-income
(LMI) persons. That benefit may take the form of housing, jobs, and services. Additionally, activities
may qualify for CDBG assistance if the activity will benefit all the residents of a primarily residential
area where at least 51 percent of the residents are low- and moderate-income persons, i.e. area-
benefit. The census block where Arden Manor is located meets the area-benefit threshold as the park
services the surrounding LMI residents. According to HUD, 61.8 percent of the residents in this area
are considered low- and moderate-income persons.
Staff has requested $189,700 in grant funding, in addition to $60,000 from the PIR Fund ($110,000
was originally budgeted for this project), to make the following site improvements and replace
existing playground equipment:
1. Park site would be regraded to improve drainage and minimize localized nuisance flooding.
CONSENT ITEM – 6C
MEMORANDUM
Page 2
2. Sidewalks, pathways, and playground spaces would be reconfigured and reconstructed with
curbing and ADA access.
3. Assist in funding for additional playground equipment to provide separate play areas for
children ages 3-5 and ages 5-12.
4. The existing picnic shelter would be replaced based on modern design specifications and
ADA access standards.
5. Playground areas would be completed with wood fiber mulch to meet safety standards.
6. Drainage improvements would be installed within the open field area to minimize standing
water.
Staff has been informed that the County Staff administering these funds supports the project and will
be recommending to the board to fully fund the project. Following the official board approval,
respective staffs will meet later in May to talk about the project and next steps.
Budget Impact
The estimated costs and funding is provided below.
COSTS
Playground equipment 52,000
Site improvements 140,000
Engineering 35,000
Contingency (10%) 22,700
249,700
FUNDING
City PIR Fund 60,000
CDBG Grant 189,700
249,700
The 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan has $110,000 programmed for the replacement of the
existing playground equipment at the park.
Attachment
Attachment A: Resolution 2021-017 in Support of Arden Manor Park Improvements CDBG
Application
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-017
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ARDEN MANOR IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the City is planning improvements to Arden Manor Park; and
WHEREAS, Arden Manor is located in income block group census tract 40801-1 within
the City of Arden Hills; and
WHEREAS, The City is requesting $189,700.00 in Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funding to assist with the park improvements in Arden Hills.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills, Minnesota, that the City supports the CDBG application to fund the proposed park
improvements
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS
12th DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Julie Hanson, City Clerk
Page 1
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Hall HVAC Project Payment #4 and Change Orders #3 - 4 to Air Express
Budgeted Amount: Cost to Date: Funding Source:
$303,800 $170,050 of $280,783 Building/Equipment Fund
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Payment # 4 to Air Express for the City Hall HVAC Project in the amount of $9,975
• Authorize Change Orders # 3 and 4
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Discussion
On October 12, 2020, the City Council awarded the City Hall HVAC Project to Air Express in the
amount of $268,560.00 (an additional five percent contingency ($12,223) was built into the project
for a total project cost of $280,783). The contractor is requesting payment, less five percent ($525)
in retainage, in the amount of $9,975. The City’s engineering consultant, Paulson and Clark, has
reviewed and agrees with the payment request. Previous payments made to the contractor and the
requested payments are below:
Payment #Work Completed Retainage Payment
Payment #1 14,200$ 710$ 13,490$
Payment #2 12,500$ 625$ 11,875$
Payment #3 141,800$ 7,090$ 134,710$
Payment #4 10,500$ 525$ 9,975$
Total to date 179,000$ 8,950$ 170,050$
There are two Change Orders included in this request, one for $700, which is for additional
unforeseen work on existing piping that was necessary to move the project forward (see
Attachment C), this work has already been completed. The third larger Change Order for $6,221 is
for additional work on the control system that has not been completed yet, but is recommended by
the City’s consulting engineer. A brief summary on Change Order #3 is below (see Attachment B).
CONSENT ITEM – 6D
MEMORANDUM
Page 2
Note, two Change Orders were previously proposed by the contractor that were rejected, which is
why we are on Change Orders 3 & 4.
We would recommend approving the proposed control changes. The new outdoor air temp
sensor will aid in the boiler efficiency as the heating water temp will be lowered as the
outdoor air temp goes up. The humidity sensors will provide better efficiency with regards
to the air handling unit economizer controls. The added fan status points will help the
AHUs run more efficient, aid in building pressurization and make diagnosing AHU issues
easier.
Budget Impact
This payment is in line with the expected cost of the project and will not have an adverse effect on
the budget.
Attachment
Attachment A: Application and Certificate for Payment #4
Attachment B: Change Order # 3
Attachment C: Change Order # 4
CONTINUATION SHEET - Schedule of Values AIA DOCUMENT G703PAGE - 2 OF 2AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT,APPLICATION NO:4containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached.APPLICATION DATE:03/25/21In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.PERIOD TO:2-26 to 3-25Use column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply.ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:ABCDEFG HIITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORKSCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL % BALANCE RETAINAGENO. VALUE FROM PREVIOUS THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED (G/C) TO FINISH 5%APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (C-G)(D+E) (NOT IN TO DATED OR E) (D+E+F)1 HVAC and Plumbing$0.00 $0.002 Equipment $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 100% $0.00 $5,000.003 Equipment install-labor $25,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 80% $5,000.00 $1,000.004 Demolition $18,000.00 $13,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.00 100% $0.00 $900.005 Balancing $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% $5,000.00 $0.006 Bond/Permit $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 100% $0.00 $425.007 Misc/overhead/profit $20,780.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 48% $10,780.00 $500.008910 Subcontractors11 Electrical $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 100% $0.00 $125.0012 Johnson Controls $58,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% $58,000.00 $0.0013 Roofers $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 100% $0.00 $375.0014 Refrigerant Recovery $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 100% $0.00 $125.0015 Misc/overhead/profit $20,780.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 48% $10,780.00 $500.0017182021222324252627282930313234353637 SUB TOTALS: $268,560.00 $168,500.00 $10,500.00 $0.00 $179,000.00 $89,560.00 $8,950.00Change OrdersChange Orders: Fix leak in plumbing pipes $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00CHANGE ORDER TOTALS: $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% $700.00 $0.00GRAND TOTALS $269,260.00 $168,500.00 $10,500.00 $0.00 $179,000.00 66% $90,260.00 $8,950.00
[Type here]
Change Order
Owner/ Contractor:______________________________________________
Project Address:____________________________________________________________
Change Order #:_______________________________
Items included Change Proposal Price:
New Building Outdoor Air Temp/Humidity: Johnson Controls will install and program a new building
master outdoor temp and humidity sensor on the north wall of the building. This will be wired to the new
heating system controller in the boiler room, and mapped to the other systems on the BAS. The current
outdoor air sensors are in poor locations and are not accurate. Adding a humidity sensor will also allow
better economizer determination to prevent bringing humid air into the building.
AHU-1 Supply/Return Fan Status: Johnson Controls will connect supply and return fan statuses to the
respective VFD run status contacts. Currently there are no status points on the BAS for these fans, and
our new programming requires status inputs for the control loops to function. It will also be beneficial for
the operator to see actual fan status points for the fans for trending and alarming.
AHU-2 Return Fan Status/Command: Johnson Controls will install a current relay in the AHU-2 return
fan starter to monitor fan status. Currently there is no status point on the BAS for this fan. We will also
give the return fan its own dedicated start command. Currently it is landed on the supply fan command
output. This will also be beneficial for the operator to see an actual return fan command and status point
for trending and alarming.
Electrical Subcontractor Cost for Control Wiring
Scope Exclusions:
•Premium Time
Not Valid Until Signed by Owner/General contractor and subconstractor(Air Express Inc)
The Original Contract Sum $_____________________
Contract Sum prior to above change order(previous change order amount included and will be
counted a prior net sums)
The contract sum will be increased by this amount
The new contract sum including this change order is
Does this change the compeltion date ? Yes No
If yes please specify new completion date ___/___/______
City of Arden Hills
1245 Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112
3
268,560.00
268,_____560.00____ $ ____________
$ 6,221.00
__274,_____781.00___ $ ____________
x
_____________________
Owner/General Contractor
Name:____________________
Title:_____________________
Signature:______________________
Subcontractor:
Name:____________________
Title:____________________
Signature:_______________________
Date:_______________________ Date:________________________
Air Express Inc.
Project Manager
03/09/2021
Page 1 of 2
CONSENT ITEM – 6E
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Public Works 2021 Capital Equipment Purchases
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$359,960.00 $319,069.18 Equipment Replacement Fund
(2021 CIP) (Current)
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Purchase of Public Works equipment including a portable message board, a portable
light tower, two-Groundsmaster Zero Turn 7210 mowers, and an Altoz TRX 766i
mower.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Background/Discussion
At the March 15, 2021 Work Session, staff presented to Council the eight equipment items
included in the 2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for replacement or addition, consisting of
two pickup trucks, a plow truck, three mowers and two pieces of safety equipment. With
direction from Council following the Work Session, staff has gathered quotes for all of the
equipment less the replacements for Unit 210 and Unit 203. The replacements for those units will
be brought to Council for approval after the 2022 State Cooperative Contract has been finalized
(Approximately 45 days). Council has already approved the replacement of Unit 120, the 2011
International Plow Truck with a 2021 Mack Plow Truck (Attachment E).
A brief summary of the equipment currently seeking approval is provided below with more
specific details.
Page 2 of 2
Portable Message Board
(Attachment A) The trailer mounted message board is to replace the existing truck mounted
message board on vehicle Unit 210. A trailer mounted unit would be more versatile, allowing
placement of the message board within work zones or along roadways without removing a
vehicle from use as occurs with a truck mounted message board. The presented message board
also has radar and data collection features for speed and traffic counts.
Portable Light Tower
(Attachment B) Public Works staff is currently working in dark conditions loading and
unloading trucks during after hour emergencies. The generator powered towable light tower
would also be used on job sights when needed. The equipment follows OSHA safe work space
compliance.
Trade-in Program Toro “Z” Mowers (Units 458 & 459)
(Attachment C) Units 458 & 459 trade-in value of the Toro "Z" mowers is maximized if they are
traded in with warranty still remaining. Due to the amount of time these pieces of equipment are
used during the summer months, they are traded in on a three-year cycle. These units will be
replaced with similar machines Groundsmaster 7210 “Z” mowers.
Replace 1997 Toro Groundsmaster (Unit 409)
(Attachment D) Unit 409 is used for trail and off-road mowing, including climbing steep hills.
This machine is 4WD, has 2929 hours of operation, and replacement parts are becoming more
difficult to find with the equipment being 24 years old. Staff recommends replacement of Unit
409 with a Rough-Cut Off-Road Machine Altoz TRX 766i. Staff recommends sending the 1997
Toro Groundsmaster to auction.
Budget Impact
The Capital Improvement Program for equipment purchases was restructured in 2020 to allow
for early replacement of the snow plow Unit 120 which ultimately got carried over to 2021 due
to COVID. Below is a table with the updated quotes for equipment currently seeking approval
and also the 2021 Mack Plow Truck.
2021 Equipment Costs:
Portable Message Sign $ 17,614.00
Portable Light Tower $ 12,493.00
2-Groundsmaster 7210 mowers $ 27,840.53
Altoz TRX 466i mower $ 19,237.65
Mack Plow Truck $241,884.00
TOTAL: $319,069.18
Attachments
Attachment A: Portable Message Board
Attachment B: Portable Light Tower
Attachment C: Groundsmaster 7210 mowers
Attachment D: Altoz TRX 766i mower
Attachment E: 2021 Mack Plow Truck – Executed Order
Sales Quote
Account Arden Hills, City of
Account
Contact Jeff Frid
Quote #217883
Terms Net 30
7526 4th Ave
Lino Lakes, MN, 55014
Representative: Adam Berg
Phone: +1 6514409229
Email: aberg@streetsmartrental.com
Date March 17, 2021
Billing Address Shipping Address
1245 W. Hwy 96
Arden Hills, MN, 55112
1245 W. Hwy 96
Arden Hills, MN, 55112
Item Name Part Number / Description Qty Unit Price Total
Mini Full-Matrix CMS PCMS-548/HYD 1 $14,775.00 $14,775.00
Houston Radar OPT-MS-Radar 1 $1,696.00 $1,696.00
Data Log OPT-MS-DATA Automation 1 $643.00 $643.00
30-AMP Battery Charger OPT-MS-30-AMP/IQ4 1 $500.00 $500.00
Mileage Charge Free Delivery and Training 1 $0.00 $0.00
Subtotal $17,614.00
Tax $0.00
Total $17,614.00
Pricing provided on this quote is valid for up to 30 days after the printed date
Notes and Comments Terms and Conditions
Quoting:
(1) PCMS 548
- with Radar & Data Logger, Battery Charger
** This and all of our equipment can be purchased directly
off of our MN State Equipment Contract #184580
To accept this quote and terms outlined above, sign and
date, and return.
Customer Signature: \s1\
Print Name: \n1\
Date: \d1\
This quote and any attachments originated from Street Smart Rentals may contain information that is proprietary, privileged client communications, or
work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, or distribute this information. If you received this in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies
If you have any questions, please give us a call at 888-653-6800
Find us online at www.streetsmartrental.com
Thank you for your business!
Ziegler Inc.
Page 1 of 2
March 31, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PUBLIC WORKS
1245 HIGHWAY 96 W
ARDEN HILS, Minnesota 55113
ATTN: JEFF FRID
Dear Jeff,
We would like to thank you for your interest in our company and our products, and are pleased to quote the following for your
consideration.
Allmand Model: PRO II LIGHT PLANT
We wish to thank you for the opportunity of quoting on your equipment needs. This quotation is valid for 30 days, after which time we
reserve the right to re-quote. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Rossez
Territory Manager
Ziegler Inc.
Page 2 of 2
Allmand Model: PRO II LIGHT PLANT
STANDARD EQUIPMENT
STANDARD FEATURES - 25 ft. vertical six section tower - Tower cable encased in Nycoil flexible tubing - 7.5 kW generator - 1800
rpm liquid-cooled diesel - 12 volt electric start - Alternator: 30 amp, 12-volt - Fuel consumption: .46 gal/hr - Fuel capacity: 30 gallon -
Lamps: Four (4) 1250 watt Metal Halide SHO-HD - 5000 Watt Lighting System with best-in-class - 150,000 initial lumens per lamp -
Fenders: Dent and rust resistant - Frame: Formed welded steel Heavy-duty enclosure - 2in ball coupler- three inch pintle towing hitch
- Stop / Turn / Tail Lights - Environ-friendly full fluid containment system - Four-point outrigger design - Tower center-mounted
retractable side outriggers - Generator: 7.5 or 8 kW alternator, 60 Hz 1 phase - Circuits: Hard-wired electrical - Ballast: Easily
serviceable - 120 Volt GFCI duplex convenience outlets - Ground rod - Low oil pressure, high temperature automatic - shutoff, glow
plug cold start system - Wheels and tires: 13'' - Total weight: Approx. 1800 lbs -
MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS
DESCRIPTION
PRO II VERTICAL
SELL PRICE $12,493.00
NET BALANCE DUE $12,493.00
BALANCE $12,493.00
WARRANTY
Standard Warranty: Standard Manufacturer's Warranty
F.O.B/TERMS: COLUMBUS
City of Arden Hills Quote Date: 3.25.2021
Jeff Frid Quote Id#Q00549
651-792-7852 Award Price Type: MN State Contract
Contract #188861
Quantity Model #Product Name Unit Award
Price
Extended Award
Price
2 30495 Groundsmaster 7200 No Deck $16,977.22 $33,954.44
2 30456 60 Inch Side Discharge Deck $3,486.94 $6,973.88
1 xx-ue Less trade in Toro GM 7200 30495-401387147 -$7,500.00 -$7,500.00
1 xx-ue Less trade in Toro GM 7200 30495-401387153 -$7,500.00 -$7,500.00
$25,928.32
$1,912.21
$27,840.53
• New Toro Commercial Equipment includes a Two (2) Year Manufacture Warranty
• Terms: For qualified credit-net 30 terms
Bob Frank, SCPS Mandi Prinsen, SCPS
Outside Sales Representative Inside Sales Representative
612-877-0837 800-492-6344
bob.frank@mtidistributing.com
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to partner with you on your equipment needs. We are pleased to submit this
equipment proposal for your review. All of the proposed Toro equipment meets, or exceeds, ANSI Safety Specifications.
Toro Equipment Proposal
Please do not hesitate in contacting us with any questions.
Award Price Subtotal
Sales Tax (7.375%)
Award Price Total
mandi.prinsen@mtidistributing.com
MTI Distributing, Inc. • 4830 Azelia Avenue North, Suite 100 • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
• Quote valid for 30 days
• Set-Up and Delivery at No Charge
• 2.5% Service Fee to be applied to all invoices paid via Credit Card
Item Type Description Qty Tax Price Discount Net Price
TRX 766I / NEW QU ALTOZ TRX 766I Yr: 2021 1.0000 $20,999.00
LAW - ALTOZ MOWER,VANGUARD V37,ALL TERRAIN DECK
Line Discount: 10.00%($2,099.90)
Total TRX 766I / NEW $18,899.10
2500394 PA ALT - KIT,LIGHT 1.0000 $246.95 $24.70 $222.25
Discount applied: 10.00%
2500384 PA ALT - KIT,REAR DEBRIS SHIELD 1.0000 $39.94 $3.99 $35.95
Discount applied: 10.00%
List Price: $52.30
SH MC SHIPPING & HANDLING 1.0000 Y $75.00 $75.00
Total:$19,232.30
Totals
Sub Total:$19,232.30
0.25% TRANSIT:$0.19
6.875% MN TAX:$5.16
Total Tax:$5.35
Invoice Total:$19,237.65
MN STATE CONTRACT T-775(5) CONTRACT #178422
-OR-
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONNECTION CONTRACT # 17.10-OEV (PREFERRED)
PRICING AND TERMS ARE IDENTICAL ON EITHER CONTRACT
Signature:______________________________________
Quote is Valid for 30 days, programs and discounts subject to change without notice
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
1245 W HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 US
Bill To:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Ship To:
QUOTE - DO NOT PAY
Cust Email:
Phone:
Salesperson:
User:
jfrid@cityofardenhills.org
(651) 755-1461
Scott.F
Scott.F
PO: TRX 766i
CustId: CITYARDEN
Quote: 02-140631
Date: 3/18/2021
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Print Date&Time 3/3/2020 14:20
VENDOR NAME NUSS TRUCK& EQUIPMENT
YEAR: AND MODEL 2021 MACK GRANITE 42FR SA
WB 187"
CA 96" 777 Total 108,963.00F
AF 62"
I Rear Ratio
4.33
Cab Color WHITE
Wheel WHITE
Color
Notes CITY OF ARDEN HILLS UPDATE 3-2-2020
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
1.0 Price for base unit: 1 1 $ 82,237.00 $ 82,237.00
2.0 FRAME OPTIONS
2.10 Front frame extension 1 $ 886.00 $ 886.00
2.20 Custom hole punching in frame 100.00 $
2.30 Deduct for no front bumper 1 $60.00) $60.00)
2.40 Frame fastener option (bolt or huck spun) 1 STD
2.50 Frame, R.B.M., S.M., PSI, CT
2.60 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA 6420 $
2.70 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 113- 133 CA STD
2.80 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 107.00 $
2.90 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 153- 199 CA 406.00 $
2.10 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 200-236 CA 482.00 $
2.11 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 87 - 112 CA 176.00 $
2.12 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 113 - 133 CA 240.00 $
2.13 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 134 - 152 CA 347.00 $
2.14 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 153- 199 CA 646.00 $
2.15 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 200- 236 CA 722.00 $
2.16 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 87- 112 CA 1 $ 521.00 $ 521.00
2.17 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 113- 133 CA 585.00 $
2.18 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 134- 152 CA 692.00 $
2.19 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 153- 199 CA 991.00 $
2.20 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 200 -236 CA 1,067.00 $
2.21 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 87- 112 CA 744.00 $
2.22 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 113- 133 CA 808.00 $
2.23 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 134- 152 CA 915.00 $
2.24 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 153- 199 CA 1,214.00 $
2.25 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 200 -236 CA 1,290.00 $
2.26 IDOUBLE FRAME - PARTIAL IC REINFORCEMENT
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2 of 20
PRICING PAGE
spec# Description Qty Price Subtotal
2.27 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87- 112 CA 801.00 $
2.28 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113 - 133 CA 865.00 $
2.29 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134- 152 CA 972.00 $
2.30 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153- 199 CA 1,214.00 $
2.31 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200-236 CA 1,290.00 $
2.32 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,041.00 $
2.33 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,105.00 $
2.34 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,212.00 $
2.35 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153- 199 CA 1,511.00 $
2.36 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200-236 CA 1,587.00 $
2.37 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,376.00 $
2.38 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,450.00 $
2.39 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,657.00 $
2.40 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153- 199 CA 1,856.00 $
2.41 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200-236 CA 1,932.00 $
2.42 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,832.00 $
2.43 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,673.00 $
2.44 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 2,003.00 $
2.45 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 154- 199 CA 2,301.00 $
2.46 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200-236 CA 2,384.00 $
2.47 DOUBLE FRAME -FULL IC REINFORCEMENT
2.48 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,001.00 $
2.49 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,065.00 $
2.50 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,172.00 $
2.51 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153- 199 CA 1,414.00 $
2.52 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200-236 CA 1,490.00 $
2.53 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,241.00 $
2.54 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,305.00 $
2.55 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,412.00 $
2.56 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,711.00 $
2.57 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200-236 CA 1,787.00 $
2.58 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,576.00 $
2.59 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,650.00 $
2.60 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,857.00 $
2.61 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153- 199 CA 2,056.00 $
2.62 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200-236 CA 1,787.00 $
2.63 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87- 112 CA 1,576.00 $
2.64 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,650.00 $
2.65 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134- 152 CA 1,857.00 $
2.66 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153- 199 CA 2,056.00 $
2.67 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200-236 CA 2,132.00 $
2.68 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87- 112 CA 2,032.00 $
2.69 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113- 133 CA 1,873.00 $
2.70 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134- 152 CA 2,203.00 $
2.71 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 153- 199 CA 2,501.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 3 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty: Price Subtotal
2.72 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200 -236 CA 2,584.00 $
2.73 TRIPLE FRAME - FULL IC REINFORCEMENT
2.74 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 87- 112 CA 4,960.00 $
2.75 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 113- 133 CA 5,024.00 $
2.76 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 134- 152 CA 5,131.00 $
2.77 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 153- 199 CA 5,430.00 $
2.78 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 200-236 CA 5,506.00 $
2.79 Flush bright finish channel steel 113.00 $
2.80 Extended stylized-silver-bright finish steel w/stone guard 1,495.00 $
2.81
Extended -swept back steel, bright finish with stone guard -
includes center tow pin 1,139.00 $
2.82 Mill finish, flush mounted, unpainted aluminum 68.00 $
z 83
Extended swept back channel steel (includes center tow pin)
w/stone guard 805.00 $
z 84
Extended swept back channel steel with bright finish w/painted
center tow pin 620.00 $
2.85 Extended swept back steel channel w/bright finish 258.00 $
2.86 Extended swept back painted steel 1 STD
2.87 Flush painted steel 15.00) $
2.88 Flush stainless clad aluminum 143.00 $
2.89 Plate type radiator guard 105.00 $
2.90 Bright finish plate type radiator guard 258.00 $
2.91 Tectyl 185 GW pigmented compound between frame rails 110.00 $
2.92 BOC crossmember, steel HD back to back channel intermediate
66.00 $
2.93 BOC & intermediate crossmember, HD I-Beam 332.00 $
2.94 Frame rail clearance 62.00 $
3.0 FRONT AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTION
3.1 Set forward front axle option 1 STD
3.2 12,000 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL12 STD
3.3 14,600 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL14.6 771.00 $
3.4 16,000 front axle and matching suspension
3.5 18,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL18 1,361.00 $
3.6 20,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL20 1 $ 2,147.00 $ 2,147.00
3.7 23,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL23 2,448.00 $
3.8 Heavy duty front axle shocks 1 STD
3.9 Front stabilizer bar
3.10
Right hand air bag suspension per Spec 3.6,Driver controlled
3.11
Left air bag suspension per Spec 3.6, Driver controlled
3.12 Front axle lubrication cap with slotted venthole
3.13 Front brake dust shields 1 $ 18.00 $ 18.00
3.14 Dual front auxiliary steering gear 569.00 $
3.15 RH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 4 of 20
PRICING PAGE
1-:-.......................................................................
Spec# I Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
3.16 LH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00 $
3.17 All wheel drive front axle 43,000.00 $
3.18 Twin Steer Front Axle 12,612.00 $
3.19 Aluminum front hubs 53.00 $
3.20 Centerfuse outboard mounted brake drums 217.00 $
3.21 Multileaf front spring ILO taperleaf(2 leaf spring) 35.00 $
3.22 HD mulitileaf front spring 11-0 taperleaf(2 leaf spring) i $ 65.00 $
3.23 HD taperlead (3 leaf spring) 11-0 of taperleaf(2 leaf spring) 65.00 $
3.24 Meritor EX+Air Disc Brakes requires Meritor rear brakes 653.00 $
3.25 Meritor front slack adjustors- Need same slack on rear axle 1.00 $
3.26 Meritor front slack with stainless steel pins 1 $ 58.00 $ 58.00
3.27
Haldex front slack adjustors- Need same slack adjustor on rear
axle STD
3.28 Haldex front slack with stainless steel pins 57.00 $
3.29 Meritor front brakes ILO of Bendix- requires Meritor rear brakes 1 $131.00 $ 131.00
3.30 Power steering reservoir with visible sight glass 30.00 $
4.0 4.0 SINGLE REAR AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTIONS
4.1 17,500#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension
4.2 19,000#rear axle& matching suspension
4.3 19,000#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension
4.4 21,000#rear axle and matching suspension 110.00) $
4.5 21,000#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension 374.00 $
4.6 22,000#rear axle and matching suspension
4.7 22,000#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension
4.8 23,000#rear axle and matching suspension 181.00 $
4.9 23,000#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension 1 $ 665.00 $ 665.00
4.10 26,000#rear axle and matching suspension 880.00 $
4.11
26,000#driver differential locking rear axle and matching
suspension 1,364.00 $
Meritor RS23160 rear axle and 26,000#rear suspension, driver diff.
4.12
lock. 830.00 $
4.13 17,500#air suspension in lieu of springs
4.14 19,000#air suspension in lieu of springs
4.15 21,000#air suspension in lieu of springs
4.16 22,000#air suspension in lieu of springs
4.17 23,000#air suspension in lieu of springs 120.00 $
4.18 26,000#air suspension in lieu of springs
4.19 Dash mounted air dump system
4.20 1/
2 round universal joints 1 STD
4.21 Spicer 1810 HD drive line with half round universal joints 126.00 $
4.22 Rear axle heavy duty shocks
4.23 Rear auxiliary spring, 4500#
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 5 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
4.24 Rear stabilizer bar
4.25 Rear brake dust shield 1 $ 18.00 $ 18.00
4.26 Mack RA23R 23,000 lbs rear axle STD
4.27 Meritor RS-30-185 30,000 lbs rear axle 1,812.00 $
4.28 Dana-Spicer S30-190 30,000 lbs rear axle 3,209.00 $
4.29 Mack interwheel power didiver for RA23R axle 1,367.00 $
4.30 Mack CRD203 carrier 377.00 $
4.31 Mack interwheel power divider for CRD2031 axle 1,367.00 $
4.32 Driver controlled interwheel differential lock 484.00 $
Meritor RS23160 rear axle and 30,000#rear suspension, driver
4.33
diff. lock. 1,050.00 $
4.34 Tractech No-Spin both axle 1,129.00 $
4.35 23,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring with helper 1 $130.00 $ 130.00
4.36 26,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring with helper 165.00 $
4.37 30,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring with helper 515.00 $
4.38 30,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring 385.00 $
4.39 38,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring 825.00 $
4.40 21,000 lbs Mack Multileaf spring 110.00) $
4.41 Mack AL231 air ride suspension 120.00 $
4.42 Neway 30,000 lbs AD-130 air ride suspension 1,165.00 $
4.43 Meritor wide track axle 516.00 $
4.44 Lube pump and filter 242.00 $
4.45 Meritor 18 MXL extended lube 1 $ 31.00 $31.00
4.46 Meritor 175 MXL extended lube 32.00 $
4.47 Dana-Spicer SPI-1 70XL extended lube series 453.00 $
4.48 Dana-Spicer SPL250XL extended lube series 493.00 $
4.49 Dana-Spicer SPL250DXL extended lube series 502.00 $
4.50 Dana-Spicer SPL350DXL extended lube series 776.00 $
4.51 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustors STD
4.52 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustors with stainless steel pins 96.00 $
4.53 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustors 1.00 $
4.54 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustors with stainless steel pins 1 $ 231.00 $ 231.00
4.55 Meritor 16.5" x 7" rear brakes 1 $ 58.00 $58.00
4.56 Meritor 18"x 7" P rear brakes 53.00 $
4.57 Meritor 16.5"x 7" P rear brakes 53.00 $
4.58 Meritor 16.5"x 7" heavy duty rear brakes 28.00
4.59 Haldex"Gold Seal" brake chambers 1 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
4.60 Haldex"Life Seal" brake chamber STD
4.61 MGM TR 30/30 LF`3 (Y Stroke) brake chambers 44.00 $
4.62 MGM MODEL LTR-L3 (Y Stroke) 114.00 $
4.63 MGM TR3030LP3THD 66.00 $
4.64 JMGM MODEL TR-T tamper-resistant brake chamber 26.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 6 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
MGM MODEL TR-T tamper-resistant brake chamber- reclock inlet
4.65
ports for optimum ground clearance 43.00
4.66 Haldex"Gold Seal" 3.0" stroke bake chamber 159.00
4.67 Centerifuse outboard brake drums 103.00
4.68 Aluminum preset hub with integrated spinle nut 19.00
4.69 Conmet Aluminum preset bearings &seals 192.00 $
4.70 Chicago Rawhide (Scotseal Longlife) 30.00 $
4.71 National/Federal Mogul 11.00 $
4.72 Stemco-Grit Guard 32.00
4.73 IStemco-Guardian 31.00 $
6.0 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK:
6.0 TIRES/RIMS OPTIONS:
6.1 Nylon wafers or wheel guards on all wheels (10 ea.)44.00 $44.00
6.2
Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300#
rims (10 ea.) STD
Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300#
6.3
rims (8 ea.) in rear only 16.00 $
6.4 11 R 22.5 H frFnt-tires 39.00 $
6.5 12R 22.5 H front tires 198.00 $
6.6 9000 lb. 22.5 9"front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 187.00 $
6.7 10,000 lb. 22.5 9"front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 1 407.00 $ 407.00
6.8 10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 385/65R 22.5 J front tires 609.00 $
6.9
10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 425/65R 22.5 J front tires 669.00 $
6.10 11 R 22.5 H rear tires 1 328.00 -$ 328.00
6.11 7,300 lb.
2451
x 8.25"steel front rims 5.00 $
6.12 7300 lb. 24.5"x 8.25" rear steel rims 44.00 $
6.13 8,000 lb. 24.5"x 8.25"steel front rims 10.00 $
6.14 8,000 lb. 24.5"x 8.25"steel rear rims 82.00 $
6.15 11 R 24.5 G front tires 63.00 $
6.16 11 R 24.5 H front tires 105.00 $
6.17 11 R 24.5 G rear tires 164.00 $
6.18 11 R 24.5 H rear tires 480.00 $
6.19 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 8.25 125.00 $
6.20 Steel spare rim, size 24.5 x 8.25 148.00 $
6.21 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 9.0 380.00 $
6.22 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 12.25 430.00
6.23 12R22.5 H front tires 439.00
6.24 12R 22.5 H rear tires 876.00 $
6.25 Wheel lug wrench - includes handle 48.00 $
6.26 Aluminum front wheel-22.5 x 8.25 141.00 $
6.27 Aluminum front wheel-24.5 x 8.25 156.00 $
6.28 jAluminum front wheel -22.5 x 9.0 32
6.29 jAluminum front wheel -22.5 x 12.25 387.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 7 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description QtyPrice Subtotal
6.30 Polished aluminum front wheel 48.00 $
6.31 Dura-bright bright finish front wheels 204.00 $
6.32 Wheel finishing with extra polished front wheels 76.00 $
6.33 Aluminum rear wheels-22.5 x 8.25 246.00 $
6.34 Aluminum rear wheels-24.5 x 8.25 300.00 $
6.35 Polished aluminum rear wheel four outboard of dual wheels 66.00 $
6.36 Polished aluminum rear wheel all eight(4)wheels 133.00 $
6.37 Dura-bright bright finish on all eight(4) rear wheels 667.00 $
6.38 Dura-bright bright finish on all four(2) outboard rear wheels 334.00 $
6.39 11 R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 front tires 223.00 $
6.40 11 R22.5 G Michelin XZE2 front tires 296.00 $
6.41 315/80R22.5 L Michelin XZA1 front tires 532.00 $
6.42 385/65R22.5 J Michelin XZY3 front tires 712.00 $
6.43 425/65R22.5 L Michelin XZY3 front tires 959.00 $
6.44 11 R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 rear tires 446.00 $
6.45 11 R22.5 G Michelin XDN2 rear tires 946.00 $
6.46 11 R22.5 H Michelin XDN2 rear tires 982.
6.47 11 R22.5 G Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 1,252.00 $
6.48 11 R22.5 H Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 1,336.00 $
7.0 BRAKE SYSTEM OPTIONS:
7.1 Wabco System Saver 1200 E heated air dryer 1 STD
7.2 Manual cable drain valves on air tanks with lanyard on all tanks 24.00 $
7.3 Heated air tank
7.4 Auto drain valves on air tanks 31.00 $
7.5 MGM type TR-T rear brake chambers 50.00 $
7.6
S.S. pins on slack adjuster yoke (2 ea. per yoke)
For all air brake chambers
7.7 Inverted rear brake chamber mounting in lieu of regular mounting
7.8 Relocate air dryer 49.00 $
7.9 Bendix AD9 heated air dryer 118.00 $
7.10 Bendix AD-IP heated air dryer 164.00 $
7.11 Meritor/Wabco system twin heated air dryer I $ 539.00 $
7.12 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, manual petcock 42.00 $
7.13 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, with lanyard on all
other tanks 72.00 $
7.14 Aluminum air reservoirs 192.00 $
7.15 Polished aluminum air reservoirs 252.00 $
7.16 Increase air capacity for installation of extra axles 289.00 $
7.17 MACK Road Stability Adv. Bendix ABS/ATC/RSA w/YAW control
with mud/snow switch 1,873.00 $
7.18 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/o automatic traction control 142.00 $
7.19 Bendix ABS system with traction control 270.00 $
7.20 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/auto traction control 1 $ 357.00 $ 357.00
7,21 Furnish automatic traction control (ATC full disable switch) 105.00 $
7.22 Lanyard control on supply wet tank 16.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 8 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty: Price Subtotal
7.23 Haldex"Gold Seal" brake chamber 1.00
7.24 Haldex"Life Seal" brake chamber STD
7.25 MGM TR 30/30 LP3 (Y Stroke) brake chamber 105.00 $
7.26 MGM LTR (Y Stroke) brake chamber 285.00 $
7.27 MGM TR3030LP3THD 133.00 $
7.28
MGM TR-T (Tamper Resistant brake chamber) reclock inlet ports
for optimum ground clearance 68.00 $
7.29 Haldex"Gold Seal" 3.0" stroke brake chamber 399.00 $
7.30
Electric horn sound when driver door open with park brake
released 67.00 $
7.31 Alarm to sound when driver door open & parking brake not on 43.05 $
7.32 Schreader valve located in supply tank 47.00 $
7.33 Schreader valve, secondary 47.00 $
7.34 Two (2) valve dual brake system-trailer supply and tractor-trailer
park 42.00 $
7.35 Relocate all air reservoir in frame 48.00 $
7.36 Air reservoir in frame, one reservoir on the RH rail behind Cleartech
48.00 $
7.37 Never-seize to brake shoes pins &cam rollers 33.00 $
8.0 ENGINE/EXHAUST AND FUEL TANKS OPTIONS:
List Make&Model, H.P.,torque of engine and exhaust and
fuel tank options)
a ov
8.1
V--CK MF1325M ,325HF`(g14001900 RPM (Peak)2100 RPM is-
1250 LB-FT Torque STD
Mack 7- 55 355HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov
8.2 1250 LB-FT Torque i $ 481.00 $ 481.00
8.3
Mack 7- 75 375HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peaovk) 2100 RPM G
1360 LB-FT Torque 813.00 $
8.4
Mack MP7-425M 425HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov
1560 LB-FT Torque 1,508.00 $
8.5
Mack MP7-345C 345HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov
1360 LB-FT Torque 300.00 $
8.6
Mack MP7-365C 365HP@1400-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov
1460 LB-FT Torque 651.00 $
ac MP7-395A 395HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPMGov
8.7 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00 $
Mack MP7-395C 145 -17 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov
8.8 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00 $
Mack MP8-415C 415HP(g1400-1700 RPM (r5eak) 1950 RPM Gov
8.9
1660 LB-FT Torque 2,064.00 $
8.10
Mack MP8-445C 445HP@1300-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov
1860 LB-FT Torque 2,589.00 $
8.11
Mack MP8-505C 505HP@1500-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPUZ-ov
1860 LB-FT Torque 3,311.00 $
8.12
Mack MP8-425M 425HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000TR7T
Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 2,247.00 $
8.13
Mack MP8-455M 455HP@1 500-1900 RPM (Peak)21 00U_R7W
Gov 1760 LB-FT Torque 2,635.00 $
8.14
Mack MP8-505M 5055HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 210OUIRIP-M
lGov 1860 LB-FT Torque 3,759.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 9 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
8.15
Clear Back of Cab- DPF & SCR Frame Mounted , RH Side under
Cab 1 $114.00 $ 114.00
8.16
PK7-17C2 93 gallon sleeved fuel tank, 20" clearance for
outrigger/wing plow 317.00 $
8.17 Cleartech, DPF RH side under cab w/SCR vertical RH side of cab
601.00 $
8.18
Cleartech with DPF vertical RH side BOC, w/SCR vertical LH side
BOC 3,308.00 $
rt
8.19
No Muffler, Single (R/S)Ve -ic-aMhaust Cab Mounted, Lower
Ventura Diffuser, Turned End 1 $ 318.00 $ 318.00
No Muffler, Single (R/S) Vertical Exhaust Cab Mounted, Lower I
8.20 Ventura Diffuser, Plain End 318.00 $
8.21 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End 16.00) $
8.22 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out 1 STD
8.23
Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Perf Stack
Diffuser 32.00 $
8.24
Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Side Outlet
Diffuser 126.00 $
8.25 Single (R/S)Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet
Diffuser 126.00 $
8.26
Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End- N/A with Allison
Transmission 1,065.00 $
8.27
Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out End- N/T-with
Allison Transmission 1,091.00 $
8.28
Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Side Outlet Diffu-ser-
N/A with Allison Transmission 1,507.00 $
8.29
Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet Diffuser- N/A
with Allison Transmission 1,507.00 $
8.30 Single, Bright finish heats ie stack 1 $ 65.00 $65.00
8.31 Dual, Bright finish heats ie stack 130.00 $
8.32 Single, Bright finish heat shield, stack& elbow 162.00 $
8.33 Dual, Bright finish heats ie d, stack&elbow 344.00 $
8.34 Single, Bright finish stack only 50.00 $
8.35 Dual, Bright inish stack only 99.00 $
8.36 Single, Bright finish lower elbow&stack 148.00 $
8.37 Dual, Bright finish lower elbow& stack 294.00 $
8.3s Single, Bright finish heats ie only 16.00 $
8.39 Dual, Bright finish heat shield only 31.00 $
8.40
Bright finish stainless steel heat shield for frame mounted Mack
Cap DPF 171.00 $
8.41 50 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 118.00) $
8.42 66 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 96.00) $
8.43 72 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank 62.00) $
8.44 88 Gallon LH steel 22" is fuel tank 164.00 $
8.45 93 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank 267.00 $
8.46 116 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 222.00 $
8.47 50 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 64.00) $
8.48 66 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fueFtan-F- 45.00) $
5.49 72 Ganon-ETT-a-5-minum 26" Dia fuel tank 24.00 $
8.50 88 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 231.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OFMINNESOTA 10of20
PRICING PAGE
upeow D="=p"~'Qty:: Price Subtotal
o.m 93 Gallon LH aluminum 26" Dia fuel tank dd
8.52 116 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 292.00 $
8.53 50 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 118.00) $
8.54
8.55 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 101.00 $
8.56 116 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 300.00 $
8.57 50 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 118.00) $
8.58 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 27.00) $
8.59 88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 173.00 $
8.60 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 195.00 $
8.61 116 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 367.00 $
8.62 66 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 47.00) $
8,63 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 3-00 $
8.64 111 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 325.00 $
8.65 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank STD
8.66
72 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 171.00 $
88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank - 240.00 $
uau 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 304.00 $
aay 111 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 378.00 $
111 &66 Gallon Aluminum D-Shape tanks, 66 Gallon isol-at-e-d-For
x.r/ 50 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 503.00 $
8.72 66 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 529.00 $
8.73 88 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 814.00 $
o.r* 116 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 871.00 $
8.75 50 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 570.00 $
8.76 66 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 593.00 $
8.77 88 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 879.00 $
um 116 Gallon RH aluminum 22'' Dia fuel tank 849.00 $
xre
8.80
8.81
8.82
o.m
o.o*
8.85
8.86
8.87 Single polished aluminum fuel tank 197.00 $
Dual polished aluminum fuel tank 393.00 $
nay Isolate RH fuel tank from fuel system for hyd oil 30.00 $
8.90 Dual draw& return fuel system
8.91 Filter neck screen for fuel tank 71.00 $
8.92 Lockable fuel tank cap 31.00 $
8.93 Bright finish DPF tank cover- Requires with bright finish tanks 171.00 $
8.94 Bright finish DEF tank cover 29.00 $
8.95
Bright Finish Aluminum steps & stainless steel bright finish straps 189.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 201SMODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 11 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
8 Bright Finish Fuel Tank Straps- Single Tank 1 $ 32.00 $ 3 2 0 0
8.97 Flocs oil change system w/disconnecting fittings 114.00 $
8.98 Engine oil drain kit, Flocs, SAE 1 0OR2 hose 136.00 $
9.0 ENGINE RELATED OPTIONS:
9.1 Oil fill and dipstick EZ access
9.2 Delco 35 Sl Brushless Alternator, 135 AMP 16'2-0-0 $
9.3 Delco 24 Sl Alternator, 130 AMP 1 STID
9.4 Delco 24 S1 Alternator, 145 AMP 18.00 $
9.5 Leece-Neville Alternator, 145 AMP 70.00 $
9.6 Dual element air cleaner
9.7 Donaldson Single Stage Air cleaner per spec 12.1 1 $ 278.00 $ 278.00
9.8 Thumb screws for Donaldson. Single stage Air Cleaner
9.9
Fuel/water separator/heated/Thermostatically controlled,
Brand)
9.10 Davco 382 fuel/water separator, non heated
9.11
Non-heated fuel/water separator, Mack w/manual drain valve
integral w/primary fuel filter STID
9.12 Coolant spin on filter/conditioner i $ 47.00 $47.00
9.13 Front engine powered take off adapter and radiator cut out 1 $103.00 $ 103.00
9.14 Air applied fan drive, Kysor two speed K32 Duro speed fan 135.00 $
9.15 Air applied fan drive, _(Brand)
9.16 Viscous fan drive - Behr Electronically modulated 1 STD
9.17 Radiator hose package (Silicone) per Spec 12.2 1 $ 240.00 $ 240.00
9.18 Curved exhaust pipe end 1 STD
9.19 Tuel tank per specification 12.7
9.20 Engine block heater 1 65.00 $65.00
9.21 In line fuel heater 407.00 $
9.22 In tank fuel heater 351.00 $
9.23 Fuel cooler
9.24 Radiator bug screen 1 STD
9.25 Engine brake system 604.00 $
9.26 Relocate air dryer 66.00 $
9.27 Extended life anti-freeze 1 $ 20.00 $20.00
9.28 Starter motor options
9.29 Starter motor options - Delco 39MT-MXT 1 STD
9.30 Mitsubishi electric 1 05P planetary gear reduction 46.00 $
9.31 Relocate fuel filter 38.00 $
9.32 Non-heated fuel/water separator, Racor 1000 FH 349.00 $
9.33
Silicone radiator& heater hose with gate valve on each heater
hose 201.00 $
9.34
Silicone radiator, spring clamps on radiator& heater, 1/4 turn ball
valve heater hose 212.00 $
9.35 Mack brand EPDM radiator& heater hoses with 1/4 turn ball valve 79.00 $
9.36
Mack brand EPDM radiator& heater hoses with constant torque
clamps on all coolant lines 22.00 $
9.37 Leece-Neville Alternator, 200 AMP 464.00 $
9.38 Leece-Neville Alternator, 270 AMP 659.00 [4
9.39 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brushless 106.00 1 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OFMINNESOTA 12cf20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty] Price Subtotal
Delco 36SI Alternator, 165A Amp Brushless, w/remote voltage
9.44 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brush 103.00 $
9.45 Meritor[Wabco 636 (37.4 CFM) air compressor 783.00 $
9.47 Winterfront over radiator mounted bug screen 97.00 $
9.48 Winter front cover only 52.00 $
9.49 Corrosion resistant oil pan - Recommended for snow plow trucks
9.50 Stainless steel oil pan 1 $ 1,950.00 $ 1,950.00
9.51 Davco 382 heated fuel-water separator 387.00 $ 387.00
Racor fuel filter 1000 FH, 12V electrical heater with Mack integral
9.52
fuel-water separator 374.00 $
9.53
120V, 150OW block heater with 150W oil pan heater wired to same
9.55 Tether device-furnish cap retainer for oil fill, radiator overflow tank,
battery box&tool box when furnish 23.00 $
9.56 Electric primer pump (Mack engine)with momentary switch located
9.57 Rear engine PTO (Repto)
9.58
Furnish transmission thru shaft for local installation of RMPTO for
Fuller transmission (lower left) 28.00 $
9.59
Provision for local installation of rear mounted PTO (lower center)
includes dash mounted indicator light 159.00 $
9.60
Air operated PTO control - includes in cab control (RMPTO only) 118.00 $
9.61 PTO switch and light with wiring and piping 156.00 $
9.62
PTO switch and light with wiring and piping- M-Drive transmission
156.00 $
TRANSMISSION OPTIONS:
ion (After the first Six listed options, list manual and automatic
transmission options. List make and model, #ofspeeds, type
ofshifting and whether ornot transmission includes PTO
gear(o) ornnV. Example: Allison 30V0HS, 5speed, push
button no PTO.
10.1 2 plate 14"ceramic clutch option for manual transmission
mz 2 plate 151/2"ceramic clutch option for manual transmission'
10.3 External grease Ti-tting for throw out bearing 7.00 $
10.4 Adjustment free option for 2 plate clutches 47.00 $
10.5 Synthetic (TranSynd) lubrication for Automatic TransmissUn__ 1 $ 301.00 $ 301.00
10.6 Synthetic lubrication for manual transmission STD
103 Factory option lube-transmission 56.00) $
10.8 Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 1 $ 6,147.00 $ 6,147.00
my -Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO, w/output retarder 8,178.00 $
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 13 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
10.10 Allison 3000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 8,108.00 $
lo.11 Allison 4000-RDS 5 speed push button, PTO 14,280.00 $
10.12 Allison 4000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 13,776.00 $
10.13 Allison 4000-RDS 6 speed push button, PTO, w/output ret r 13,536.00 $
10.14 Allison 4000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00 $
10.15 Allison 4500-RDS-R 6 speed, PTO 13,776.00 $
10.16 Allison 4500-RDS-R 6 speed, with retarder, push button, 77 16,776.00 $
10.17 Allison 4500-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00 $
10.18
Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (direct
drive)3,718.00 $
10.19
Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (over
drive)3,718.00 $
10.20
Mack TMD1 3AFD-'HD automated 13 speed. Transmission,
creeper/multi-speed reverse (direct drive) 7,438.00 $
Mack TMD1 3AFE5-HD automated 13 speed. Transmission,
10.21
creeper/multi-speed reverse (over drive) 7,438.00 $
Mack TMD13AFO-HD automated 14 speed. Transmission, ultra-low
10.22
creeper/multi-speed reverse (over drive) 7,839.00 $
10.23 Mack T309, 9 speed transmission, PTO STD
10.24 Mack T309LR, 9 speed transmission, PTO 142.00 $
10.25 Mack T31 0, 10 speed manuaFt-ransmission, P 10 516.00) $
10.26 Mack T31 OM, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,029.00 $
10.27 Mack T31 OM' 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,193.00 $
10.28 Mack T31 OMLR, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,250.00 $
10.29 Fuller FRO-14210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 377.00 $
10.30 Fuller RTO-14908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 855.00 $
10.31 Fuller FRO-1 521 OC, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,639.00 $
10.32 Fuller FRO-16210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,298.00 $
10.33 Fuller RTO-16908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, P75- 1,585.00 $
10.34 Fuller FRO-18210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,614.00 $
10.35 Fuller RTO-14909ALL, 11 speed manual transmissin, PTO 1,390.00 $
10.36 Fuller RTO-1 6908ALL, 11 spd manual transmissin, PTO 2,102.00 $
10.37 Mack T313LR, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,128.00 $
10.38 Mack T313, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,089.00 $
10.39 Fuller RTLO-16913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,111.00 $
10.40 Fuller RTLO-1 8913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,848.00 $
10.41 Fuller RTO-116915, 15 speed manual transmissin, PTO 2,220.00 $
10.42 Mack T318LR21, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,561.00 $
10.43 Mack T318LR, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,277.00 $
10.44 Mack T318, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,306.00 $
10.45 Fuller RTLO-1 6918B, 18 speed manual transmissin, PTO 2,725.00 $
10.46 Fuller RTLO-1 8918B, 18 speed manual transmission, PTi5- 3,407.00 $
10.47 Air assist clutch 359.00 $
10.48 Mechanical clutch cable 160.00 $
10.49 Open grated clutch pedal 14.00 $
10.50 Transmission od cooler 1 STD
10.51 Driveshaft guard for center bearing 27.00 $
10.52 7-ransmission clus-F-p-ro-ofi-ng 15.00 $
10.53 T-Handle shift lever for Allison - Floor mounted 203.00 $
10.54 Allison shift to neutral when park brake engaged 1 STID
AMENDMENT #1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 14 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qtyi Pric Subtotal
10.55 3rd or 4th gear hold for Allison transmission 30
10.56 Stainless steel transmission coolant pipes 1 $I,_ I. 175.00
10.57 Allison fill tune and dip stick under hood 1 $138.( 138.00
10.58
Remote lube fittings: clutch release, brg & both cross-shaft;
mounted under LH door 50.00 S
10.59
GPl-23 Parker gear pump- requires M75rive transmission and
RMPO 425.00 $
10.60
GPI-41 Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission and
RMPO 434.00
10.61
GPl-60 Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission-a--nCT-
RMPO 548.00 $
10.62
GPI-80 Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission and
RMPO 588.00 S
10.63
F1-61 R Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission and
RMPO 637.00 $
10.64
F1-81 R Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission and
RMPO 710.
10.65
Fl-101 R Parker gear pump- requires M-Drive transmission-a-7
IRMPO
857.01-
11.0 ELECTRICAL OPTIONS:
11.1 Resettable circuit breaker electrical protection
11.2 Automatic reset circuit breakers
11.3 Solid state circuit protection
11.4 Circuit box under hood or end of frame, each
11.5 Battery disconnect off negative side in cab control 97.00 $
11.6 Remote jump start terminals 111.00 $
11.7 Back up alarm (Preco Factory Model) 3
11.8 OEM daytime runninp li hts STD
11.9 UGA batteries in lieu ot 1950CCA 66.00 S 66.00
11.10 3 each 650/1950 CCA batteries in lieu of 2 each Fa-tterie-s STD
11-11 Battery box aft of cab S
11.12 Grote 44710 flasher
11.13 Signal Stat 935 turn signal per Spec 12.6
11.14 Auxiliary customer access circuits
Switch for snowplow lights mounted on instrumental panel. Includes
11.15 wiring terminated near headlights, for customer mounted auxiliary
snowplow lights. 1 $ 80.00 $ 80.00
11.16
Power source terminal-2 stud type-mounted on firewall or inside
cab with ground to frame rail and to starter, with 6 gauge wire.
10-position switch panel mounted on instrument panel. Includes 10
11.17 lighted switches, ignition control; switches will control relays which
will feed stud type junction block mounted inside cab.
11.18
Vehicle speed sensor with speed signal at fuse panel for sander
ground speed control sXstem. 1 $ 20.00 , $ 20.00
11.19 Battery box left hand rail back ot tuel tank 48.00 1 $
11.20 Battery terminal cable with tall battery terminal nuts 8.001 $
11.21 r5ash mounted indicator body/hoist up body builder lamp 1 1 $ 71.06 3 71.00
11.22 RH/LH led work light on both side of truck 113.00 3
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 15 of 20
PRICING PAGE
I................................................................................................................................................................;...........................................................................
Spec# Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
11.23 Polished aluminum battery box cover 52.00 $
11.24 Molded plastic with splash guard 29.00 $
11.25 Painted steel battery box 23.00 $
11.26 Lockable steel battery box 69.00 $
11.27 Battery shock pad 4.00 $
11.28 Body Link w/cab floor pass thru hole/rubber Fo-ot 1.00 $
11.29 Body Link w/o cab floor pass thru hole/rubber boot 1 STID
11.30 2 Extra dash mounted illuminated toggle switches 16.00 $
11.31 One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru battery for local
installed items 10.00 $
11.32
One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru ignition for local
installed items 10.00 $
11.33
Six extra switches 2-15A ignition, 1-20A ignition, 1-10A ignition, 1-
5A battery, & 1-20A battery 111.00 $
11.34
Eight switches-front strobe, rear strobes, wing light, wing stro e,
sander light, tail gate lock, and vibrator 1 $ 237.00 $ 237.00
11.35 Back up alarm with intermittent feature (Ambient noise sensitive) 98.00 $
11.36 Ecco back-up alarm 575 constant sound level 1 $ 74.00 $74.00
11.37 Ecco back-up alarm SA917 ambient noise sensitive 98.00 $
11.38 Pollak 41-722 constant audible (mounted on rear crossmember) 80.00 $
11.39 Fog lights 93.00 $
11.40 Fog lights provisions- includes dash control &wiring for local
installation of fog lights 13.00 $
F_ 38.00) $11.41 Omit rear tail lig ts
11.42 Incandescent tail light module 91.00 $
11.43 Brake lighting on with engine brake 84.00 $
11.44 LED type tail lights 1 $199.00 $ 199.00
11.45 Two Mack M/F 925/1850 CCA batteries 56.00 $
11.46 Three Mack 730/2190 CCA batteries 5.00 $
11.47 Three Mack 800 CCA AGM Long Life Batteries 263.00 $
11.48 Four Mack 1000/4000 CCA 182.00 $
11.49
Switch in dash with wiring to cab roof, above LH & RH doors or
local installation of strobe lights 32.00 $
11.50
LED strobe beacon lights mounted on top of cab with switc on
panel 196.00 $
11-51 LH roof mounted spot light 71*00 $
11.52 Trucklite LED side marker light 102.00 $
12.0 CAB EXTERIOR OPTIONS:
12.1 Dual electric horns 1 $ 6.00 $ 6.00
12.2 Air horns, dual, round, with snow shields 1 $ 95.00 $95.00
12.3 Dual rectangular air horns 72.00 $
12.4 Fender mirrors per Spec 12.4 133.00 $
12.5 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -West Coast 104.00 $
12.6 Remote control for R.H. mirror& heated -Bulldog stylized mirrors
378.00 $
12.7
Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors
with integral convex mirror 1 $ 474.00 $ 474.00
12.8 ,Upcharge for cab extension or larger cab T
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 16 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec Description Qty:: Price Subtotal
12.9 Severe duty aluminum cab option
12.10 Dup nt Highway orange paint or equal 31.00 $
12.11 Premium paint color option 233.00 $
12.12 1mron paint option STD
12.13 Imron and clear coat paint option 1 STD
12.14 Top of hood painted flat black 607.00 $
12.15 Cab Air Ride Suspension 1 STD
12.16 Tilting hood per Spec 12.8 1 STD
12.17 Butterfly option on hood 1 $ 413.00 $ 413.00
12.18 Transverse hood opening w/setback axle
12.19 Front fender mounted turn signals
12.20 Cab visor, external, painted to match cab color 184.00 $
12.21 Front fender extensions 1 $105.00 $ 105.00
12.22 Front fender mud flaps 1 STD
12.23 Arctic winter wiper blades 19.00 $
12.24 Optional windshield washer tank 1 $ 26.00 $26.00
12.25 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical 20.00 $
12.26 RH observation prism window in door 28.00 $
12.27 Spotlight LH, RH, or roof mounted each 71.00 $
12-28 Front tow hooks 1 STD
12.29 Rear tow hooks 22.00 $
12.30 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical - 4 keys 39.00 $
12.31 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5-West Coast heated & illuminated
123.00 $
12.32 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5-Bulldog Stylized mirrors w/integral
convex mirrors 272.00 $
12.33 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -Body color aero mirror with
integrated convex mirror 49.00) $
12.34 Remote control for R.H. mirror& heated-Aerodynamic 344.00 $
12.35 Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel - RH motorized &
heated 214.00 $
Remote control for dual mirrors &heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors12.36
illuminated with integral convex mirror 502.00 $
12-37 Remote control for dual mirrors &heated -Aerodynamic 444.00 $
12.38 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated -Aerodynamic body color 134.00 $
Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel- RH/LH both12.39
motorized & heated 252.00 $
12.40 RH observation prism window in door 28.00 $
12.41 Heated electric wiper blades 118.00 $
12.42 Heated windshield 1 $ 425.00 $ 425.00
12.43 One piece windshield 83.00 $
12.44
Tinted windshield and sides w/50%transmittance gray, tinted rear
window 50.00 $
12.45 Bright finish hood intake 1 $ 16.00 $ 16.00
12.46 Bright finish bars with surround grille 1 $ 240.00 $ 240.00
12.47 Bright finish grille 32.00 $
12.48 Bullet type chrome marker&clearance lights 75.00 $
12.49 Led type marker&clearance lights 1 $ 75.00 $75.00
12.50 RH tool box mounted on frame rail 221.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 17 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec Description Qty: Price Subtotal
1 .5 1 Heated convex mirrors 7$ 34.00 $
12.52 Electronic keyless entry 130.00 $
12.53 Bright finish RH fender mirror 67.00 $
12.54 Bus style 1/4 round black finish fender mirrors 191.00 $
12.55 Stainless steel exterior sun visor 47.00 $
Q
12.56 Bright Finish hood latches 9'00 $
10" round bright finish heated fender mirrors 412.57 00 $ 234.00
00 $12.58 Rect convex mirror above RH driver door window 00 $
13.0 CAB INTERIOR OPTIO NS:
v
13.1 Medium grade interiFF-t7rim- package
13.2 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 2.00 $
13.3 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel j 2.05- $
13.4 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1 2.00 $
13.5 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1 $ 2.00 $ 292.00
Premium grade interior trim package includes power
13.6
window and locks in package
13.7 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1 -7.00 $
13.8 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1 7.00 $
13.9 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1 7.00 $
13.10 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1 7.00 $
13.11 Round universal gauge package 1 S
13.12 Power window, passenger side 00 $
13.13 Power window/both passenger and driver window 1 i $ 0 0 $ 325.00
13.14 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player,
Weatherboard, Handfree interface, Bluetooth 1 S
13.15 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player,
Weatherband, Handfree interface, Bluetooth, Sirius/XM Satellite
13.16 Radio accommodation package includes antenna, power supply
and two speakers (No radio)
13.17 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM stereo, MP3, Weatherband,
Handfree interface, Bluetooth 15.0 0) $
13.18 0.E.M factory installed, air conditioning S
13.19 Cab mounted non-resettable hour meter
13.20
Dash mounted air cleaner air restriction gauge- (Display in Co-Pilot
only) 1 S-
13.21 Transmission temp gauges 1 S
13.22 Windshield defroster fan w/switch dash mounted 0 $
13.23 Between seats mounted console 0 $
13-24 Transmission oil sensor(check&fill) 1 S
13.25 CB hot jacks dash mounted
13.26 Tilt &telescope steering wheel S
13.27 Tilt steering wheel
7-
13.28 Self canceling turn signals
List seating options for driver and passenger seats. Use as many
options as you need to offer seat variations customers have been
buying.
13.29 1 Bostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat D. 1$
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 18 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec# Description Qty; Price Subtotal €
ostrom Talladega 5 wide ride Hi-Back air driver with 4 chamber
13.30 air lumbar 181.00 $
ostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat and air lumbar
13.31
support 137.00 $
13.32 Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat 246.00 $
Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat"Premium comfort with heig t
13.33
adj. Air lumbar 301.00 $
13.34 Air-Sears Atlas 80 hi-back driver seat 4 chamber air lumbar 1 $ 374.00 $ 374.00
13.35
National 2000 hi-back air driver seat-single chamber air lumbar, 2
position front cushion adjustable 104.00 $
ational 2000 hi-back air driver seat-three chamber air um ar,
13.36 position front cushion adjustable front cushion with adjustable rear
cushion 199.00 $
13.37 Mack fixed rider seat mid-back with integral storage compartment 82.00 $
13.38 Mack fixedrider seat hi-back with integral storage compartment 106.00 $
13.39 Extended non suspension rider seat with seat belts ( ) 101.00 $
13.40 Mack fixedhi-back rider seat 44.00 $
13.41 Bostrorn Talladega 90OR mid-back non suspension rider seat 74.00 $
13.42 ostrom Talladega 90OR hi-backnon suspension n er seat 95.00 $
13.43 gostrom Talladega 915 mid back air rider seat 200.00 $
13.44 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat 1 $ 297.00 $ 297.00
13.45 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat with air lumbar 297.00 $
13.46 National 2000 mid-back air rider seat 214.00 $
13.47 National 2000 hi-backair rider seat 250.00 $
13.48 Omit rider seat 40.00) $
13.49 Inboard mounted river arm rest 1 $
13.50 Inboard mounted rider arm rest-Air Ride Seat Only 1 $
13.51 Cloth with vinyl river& rider seat 1 $
13.52 Driver seat dust cover 1 $
13.53
Passenger seat dust cover- Not Available with fix passenger seat
13.54 All ultra leather drive and ride set 95.00 $
13.55 Orange driver& rider seat belt 1 $ 76.00 $76.00
13.56 Light& buzzer for seat bet 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00
13.57 Push button type starter 13.00 $
13.58 Diagonal grab handle on inside of driver door 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00
Co-pilot driver display (enhanced 4.5" diagonal graphic LCD display
13.59 w/4-button stalk control - includes guard dog routine maintenance
monitorin 1 STD
oa watt ambient air temp gauge or outside an road temps-
13.60
requires aero-dynamic mirrors 648.00 $
oa watt ambient air temp gauge or outside and road temps
13.61
without display- includes cable to D panel with 6" extra wire 967.00 $
oa watt ambient air temp gauge or outside and road temps
13.62
with display on dash panel 1,081.00 $
13.63
51b fire extinguisher between LH seat base and door with valve
aimed rearward 1 $ 66.00 $66.00
13.64 Reflector kit parallel to inside of rider base seat 1 $ 27.00 $27.00
13.65 Air conditioning blend air HVAC with temp regulation 81.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENT G0210-2000006496 STATE OF MINNESOTA 19 of 20
PRICING PAGE
I........................:...........................................................................
Spec# Description Qty: Price Subtotal
it conditioning blend air HVAC with ATC temp regulation-&-
13.66 APADS 226.00 $
13.67
Air conditioning with air conditioning protection &diagnostic system
APADS) 132.00 $
13.68 ab cleanout- includes in cab pneumatic line 46.00 $
13.69 40 Channel CB Radio, 10 channel weather 1 $ 205.00 $ 205.00
13.70 48" Radio antenna right side mirror mounted 4.00 $
13.71 48"CB Antennae side mirror mounted 1 $ 38.00 $38.00
13.72 CB hot jacks mounted on the dash and in header console 17.00 $
13.73 CB -mounting in console & external speakers 107.00 $
13.74 Auto shutoff for radio when truck is in reverse 1 $ 47.00 $47.00
13.75 Exhaust pyrometer&transmission of temperature gauges STD
13.76
Exhaust pyrometer, transmission oil temperature, manifold
pressure and air application gauges 1 $ 75.00 $75.00
13.77
Exhaust pyrometer,transmission oil temperature, manifold
pressure and air application gauges, Air Suspension 100.00 $
13.78 TFear Axle temperature gauge 91.00 $
13.79 TTETTFO_o 'Ig hting w/switch plus (4) door lamps w/swit-cFe-s 103.00 $
13.80
Interior<iorage console mounted on floor between seats w/12 volt
power o 'et 308.00 $
13.81 [1 o yui,, -,r interior console mounted to floor between seats 209.00 $
14.0 MN/DOT )PTIONS:
14.10 Addition, warrant coverage per spec 12.9
14.20 Engine I _gin 1 60 months 250,000 miles 1,200.00 $
14.30 "E"n-gine P .-in 1 72 months 250,000 miles 2,200.00 $
14.40 Engine in 1 84 months 250,000 miles 2,520.00 $
14.50 7-ngine F Jn 1 60 months 250,000 miles- HP over 467155rses 2,000.00 $
14.60 ngme Plan 1 72 months 250,000 miles- HP over 460 horses 3,300.00 $
14.7o 7-ngine F in 1 84 months 250,000 miles- HP over 46UT-orses 3,800.00 $
14.8o r-ngine f --,n 2 60 months 250,000 miles 1,900.00 $
14.90 7 n g-in e n 2 72 months 250,000 miles 3,800.00 $
14.10 nglne a 2 84 months 250,000 miles 4,300.00 $
14.11 r-ngine n 2 60 months 250,000 miles- HP over 460 horses 2,950.00 $
14.12 Engine a 2 72 months 250,000 miles- HP over 460 horses 5,675.00 $
14.13 rn g-in e n 2 84 months 250,000 miles- HP over 460 horses 6,450.00 $
14.14 Engine c r-treatment systems (EATS) 60 months 250,000 miles 675.00 $
14.15 Engine r-treatment systems (EATS) 72 months 250,000 miles 825.00 $
14.16
Engine r-treatment systems (EATS) 84 months 250,000 miles 950.00 $
14.17 M-Drive insmission 48 months 500,000 miles 971.00 $
14.18 M-Drive insmission 60 months 500,000 miles 2,067.00 $
14.19 M-Drive Transmission 48 months 250,000 miles 775.00 $
14.2o M-Drive Transmission 60 months 250,000 miles 1,150.00 $
14.21 M-Drive itch 48 months 250,000 395.00 $
14.22 M-Driv tch 60 months 250,000 695.00 $
14.2314.23 HVAC onditioning) 60 months 600.00 $
14.2414.24 Startei ionths 300,000 miles 203.00 $
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS SA
EVENTGO21O-2000G'4 STATE OF MINNESOTA 20 of 20
PRICING PAGE
Spec Description Qtyi Price Subtotal
w
wzs
For Prebuilu aiid Pilot meets See RFP special Terms and
conditions
14.27
Pnobui|dspcwi-,Jonmeeting (per person) toboheld inSt.
PauNNinneapn,sanaa.
14.28 Pilot inspect, .00dng (per person).
15.0 TRAILER T^.. .r7l0NG:
15.1 Trailer tow p,:c,-ge extended to rear of frame 317.00 $
15.2 Trail r pack,;je I-xtend to rear of frame per Spec 12.12 417.00 $
15.3 Single 7 pin SAE type, end of frame 1 $117.00 $ 117.00
15.4
Dual 7 pins standard SAE type, end of frame (1)for trailer with
electric brakes, (1)for trailer with air brakes 158.00 $
15.5 11-land control valve for trailer brakes 47.00 $
16.0 MANUALS/TRADE-IN INTEREST FEE:
Percent interest per month (non+compounding) onunpaid cab &
1*.1 chassis balance. Applies only toCPV Members. (Payable after
trade-in iadelivered tovendor) Penoentage/parmonth.
mQanmos.
16.2 Manuals in pi/`' [oon, parts repair and nemioo. per set
16.3 Manuals in CJ onn. parts repair and aemioe, per set
16.4 Premium Tech Tool
1/.0 De|iveryCha,yos:
17.1 Phoo per loaded ni|o List starting point
17.2 Roseville, MN 55113
18.0 Maintenance/Body Shop Repair Rate Per Hour
18.1 Rate for initial Inspection/Diagnostics
8.2 Rate for Mechanical Work
18.3 Rate for Body Work
1e.0 Quantity Discounts:
Enter the number ofunits that must bopurchased and the
corresponding discount percentage offered tothe purchaser. More
than one quantity discount may beentered.
19.1 Material surcharge
19.2 225Y62O2Omodel year increase
19.3 2021 model year increase
Total Cost: 108,963.00
MAYOR DATE
AMENDMENT#1 FOR 2019 MODELS 3A
TRUCK EQ!!/PMENT
TOW'MASTER,61361 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355 Reference No.
CO 258173PH:320.693.7900 Fx:320-693.7921 TF:990.462-4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
Appx Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS INET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
Serial No.
Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt.
1 9900046 - Body 1016" EDGE-RC/SCIS-46-36-36 - - 46" 3/16" Hardox-450 7,824.00 $7,824.00
Front, 36" 3/161, Hardox-450 radius sides (no pockets) , 361, 3/1
6" Hardox-450 Tailgate, 1/4" Hardox-450 Floor, 8" I-Beam Longsills,
Air-trip ready linkage, unpainted.
1 9901704 - Painting of Dump Body; includes media blasting of entire 2,950.00 $2,950.00
exterior & understructure, Urethane Primed, & Urethane Top Coat
s applied. CAB MATCH (WHITE) Understructure is seam sealed, and
painted Gloss Black.
1 9901701 - Installation of Dump Body to hoist 1,358.00 $1,358.00
1 9900145 - Body acc'y TMTE Air trip kit, w/solenoid valve, 311.00 311.00
1 9901702 - Installation of air operated tailgate latch kit, with 279.00 279.00
solenoid valve in hydraulic valve enclosure.
1 9900147 - Body acc Box Vibrator - Cougar model DC3200 641.00 641.00
1 9901703 - Installation of Box Vibrator, with solenoid located in 326.00 326.00
hydraulic valve enclosure.
1 9900156 - Cabshield, 1/2 type Stationary Free-Standing style,w/plain $2,403.00 $2,403.00
STAINLESS STEEL canopy, Hot-Dipped Galvanized
tubing construction support stand, Slotted Center Viewing Window, (2)
shovel holders, & reservior mounts, Installed. **NOTE: SS PER
CUSTOMER REQUEST
1 9900206 - Ladder Flip-A-Way Access ladder Pkg (Carbon Steel) , 334.00 334.00
Including Grab Handle above, and Interior Step, ea, Installed
LOCATED LH FRONT
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
i
TR[/C1FCEO!!/PMAW/VT Reference No.TOWMASTER,61381 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
PH:320-693.7900 FX:320.693-7921 TF:800-462.4517 CO 258173
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
PO Appx
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
Serial No. Ow
Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt.
1 9900211 - Body acc'y Dual "split" sander manifolds in rear corner 370.00 370.00
posts
1 9904963 - Light Warning TMTEISSM-3 PKG: 1/2 A 1/2 B, (2) SS 23H 4,161.00 $4,161.00
3-light LED Micro-Edge, 2) 5M-400 Super-LED, (2) Side TIR3 LED, (2
400 Max B-T-T LED, & (2) 400 LED BU Lights, in Stainless M
Housings, (1) TIR3 LED Wing light, and (2) 4" LED work lights
Installed. **NOTE: BLUE LIGHT HEADS LOCATED AT RH FRONT, & LH REAR
POSITIONS. SET FLASH PATTERN TO WIG-WAG
1 SPECIAL REQUEST - Special Request Charges for: 100.00 100.00
Photo Cell added to WHELEN warning light system, placed on dash to
control HIGH/LOW feature automatically.
1 9905778 - Light, Mirror Mounted ABL 3800 LED HEAD LAMP PLOW LIGHTS 1,076.00 $1,076.00
W/ICE MELTING TECHNOLOGY Installed
1 9900266 - Fender set Minimizer MIN2260, for Single Axle, black Poly, 799.00 799.00
Installed
1 1965280 - Minimizer FKMACK2B Floor Mat Set for TDM and SGL 142.00 142.00
1 9900970 - Tire Chains ON-SPOT for 1 Axle Installed 2,913.00 $2,913.00
1 9904691 - INSTALLATION of (Initial) Single camera system 279.00 279.00
NOTE INSTALLED ON RH STROBE TUBE FOR REAR WING VIEW, WIRED AS
DEFAULT CAMERA
3 9904692 - Camera System option, NORTECH 9100-2HC 120 degree night 163.00 489.00
vision CCD weather-proof HEATED camera, only GEN 5 6100
3 9904693 - Camera System option, NORTECH 9100-4 Harness, 65, 41.00 123.00
Waterproof GEN 5 6100
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
TRUCK EIJU/PMENT Reference No.
TOWMASTER,613B1 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN SS355
CO 258173PH:320-693.7900 FX:320-693-7921 TF:BOO-462-4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To• Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
PO#Salesman Terms Created Last Revised Aplix Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
2 9904694 - INSTALLATION of Camera, & Harness GEN 5 6100 93.00 186.00
NOTE: 2ND CAMERA MOUNTED OFF OF LICENSE PLATE BRACKET, AIMED TO SEE
INSIDE DUMP BODY. 3RD CAMERA MOUNTED ON LH REAR CORNER POST
W/PROTECTIVE GUARD) , QUED BY REVERSE SIGNAL FOR REVERSE ACTIVITIES
1 1941405 - Camera Guard, SS, Bolt-On 58.00 58.00
1 9905502 - PreCise ARC Sensor Mount #1126929, only GEN 5 6100 29.00 29.00
1 9905835 - PreCise ARC Sensor #1117640, only, for Wireless GEN 5 555.00 555.00
CONTROLLER Applications (LESS MTG BRKT) , installed
1 9905309 - 43 point GRACO Grease Jockey Auto Lube System Installed 6,085.00 $6,085.00
NOTE: SEE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE FOR LUBE POINTS.
1 9905768 - Pre-Wet Towmaster/Varietch LDS-TG100-EGF Tailgate mt .100 2,231.00 $2,231.00
gallon tank, SS mtg hardware, plumbing, & Electric Gravity
NOTE: THIS IS IN ADDITION TO SIDE TANKS. SEE ALL PREWET LINE ITEMS
FOR CLARITY
1 9902487 - Installation of TAILGATE pre-wet system (New Towmaster) 697.00 697.00
NOTE: FEED LINE WILL BE JOINED TO SIDE TANKS VIA TEE, WITH SHUT-OFF
VALVE AT TANK OUTLET
1 9900994 - Pre-Wet Up charge for hydraulic pump in lieu of gravity 1,787.00 $1,787.00
feed, on all systems, installed complete
NOTE: THIS PUMP SYSTEM WILL BE USED FOR PRE-WET TREATMENT OF
GRANULAR, AND ALSO TO SUPPLY ANTI-ICE SPRAY BAR. SEE SPECIAL REQUEST
LINE ITEM FOR SPRAYBAR CONFIGURATION AND DETAILS.
1 9900299 - Pre-Wet Towmaster/Varitech LDS-TMR-110-EGF Body Side Mt Sys $2,104.00 $2,104.00
for Elliptical body. (2) 55 gal tanks, mtg hdwe, plumbing,
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
i
TR(/C/CEpIJ/PMIsrNT Reference No.
TOWMASTER,61381 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
CO 258173PH:320-693.7900 FX:320-693-7921 TF:800.462.4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
130#Salesman Ternis Created Last Revised Appx Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
Elec Gravity Feed valve
1 9902483 - Installation of TMR pre-wet system (New Towmaster Body) 883.00 883.00
1 9905480 - Pre-Wet SS Prewet Distrbution Pipe Thru Sander 288.00 288.00
NOTE: WILL BE FED BY ONE SIDE OF 3-WAY SELECTOR VALVE.
1 9901834 - Hoist OSP/Towmaster 720DH, Double Acting, W/Solid block 2,668.00 $2,668.00
rear hinge point, & OSHA approved saftey props
1 9901712 - Installation of SCISSORS TYPE double acting hoist 1,389.00 $1,389.00
1 9902920 - Scraper FALLS IB-11A 1" MB, w/single lift cylinder, LESS 6,185.00 $6,185.00
CUTTING EDGES
1 9903276 - VBL PolarFlex 3' Underchassis Complete System (includes 658.00 658.00
bolts & nuts)
2 9903277 - VBL PolarFlex 4' Underchassis Complete System (includes 877.00 $1,754.00
bolts & nuts)
1 9901705 - Installation of underbody fixed angle scraper w/single lift $2,562.00 $2,562.00
cylinder
1 9904232 - Scraper FORCE Electric pressure transmitter to read on LCD 428.00 428.00
screen, installed
1 9900351 - Scraper FORCE reverse/Auto-Lift system, ADD-A-FOLD valve, 467.00 467.00
installed
NOTE: SEE ALSO 1-BUTTON RECALL FEATURE BELOW, TO BE COORDINATED
WITH THIS LINEITEM ELECTRICALLY.
1 9902948 - Wing Falls RHSDL10A-HYDPB Primed LESS CUTTING EDGES 10,217.00 $10,217.00
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
Ar
TRL/COrEG?L//PME/VT Reference No.
TOWMASTER,613B1 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
CO 258173PH:320.693.7900 FX:320-693-7921 TF:BOU-462.4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
P0#Salesman Terins Created Last Revised Appx Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
1 9900388 - Installation Falls SDL Series Wing - w/Bulkhead Couplers 4,117.00 $4,117.00
1 9901431 - Wing Falls RL (REAR LIFT) up charge SDL WING 433.00 433.00
1 9904688 - Wing Falls POST-LESS Toe Lift in lieu of Std Front
post/slide system
1 9900477 - Wing Falls Hwy Orange - Paint Moldboard 309.00 309.00
1 9900555 - Plow Hitch Falls 44XB2/STD/STD/SA/SPR-RET/HITCH 3,013.00 $3,013.00
1 9900589 - Installation Falls Plow Hitch - 40 Series 3Line/STDBLKHD 1,745.00 $1,745.00
1 9900625 - Plow Push Unit Falls 24/44 Series Std 882.00 882.00
1 9900637 - Plow Falls High Visibility Marker Set 97.00 97.00
1 9900639 - Plow Falls Rubber Belt Deflector Kit - Installed 336.00 336.00
1 9903071 - Plow Falls TER-12/NOSHOES/PRIME/10GA LESS CUTTING EDGES 6,860.00 $6,860.00
1 9900679 - Plow Falls Hwy Orange Paint, Rev Plow, w/installation 410.00 410.00
1 9900730 - Plow Falls SCR-ADJ/SHOE/REV-PLW/STD 635.00 635.00
1 9902495 - Hitch Electronic Brake controller w/wiring to rear socket, 398.00 398.00
installed in cab of truck
1 9900775 - Hitch TMTE Medium Duty Hitch Plate assembly 355.00 355.00
1 9901172 - Hitch Installation of med duty hitch (Weld On) 190.00 190.00
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
TRL/CKEOL//PMi/VT Reference No.
TOWMASTER,613B1 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
CO 258173PH:320.693.7900 FX:320.693.7921 TF:800.462.4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phonc:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
110#Salesman Terms Created Last Revised Appx Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1 /22
NOTE: HITCH PLATE FACE TO BE LOCATED:
231n IN REFERENCE TO REAR TIRE
FACE.
1 9900776 - Hitch PH-20 Pintle Hook installed 156.00 156.00
NOTE: 40,000 LB GTW RATING
1 9900779 - Hitch 2" Square Receiver tube w/pin & clip. NOTE: DERATES 195.00 195.00
hitch, as per hitch bar utilized. Installed
NOTE: MOUNTED BELOW HITCH PLATE FOR USE WITH AI SPRAY BAR
1 9900791 - Sander Falls 1ASD-6CDSS-6P-ID-IS-LM, Salt Special 611, 4,886.00 $4,886.00
Stainless Steel Unit, LH Discharge, Single Poly Spinner Ass'y, co
mplete sander (includes extra salt shield)
1 9901718 - Sander Install & dual manifold RH & LH rear 852.00 852.00
1 9900823 - Sander TMTE Exterior (removable) sander/tailgate spill 423.00 423.00
plates, Stainless Steel
1 9900852 - Valve System, Force Add-A-Fold MCV-ISO Valve 10 Functions $12,545.00 $12,545.00
INSTALLED
NOTE: BOX HOIST, PLOW LIFT, PLOW ANGLE, WING TOE, WING HEEL, WING
PUSHBAR, SCRAPER LIFT, AUGER, SPINNER, & PRE-WET/ANTI ICE
1 9902497 - Control System Force ULTRA-4-6100 Commander control, 11,212.00 $11,212.00
Installed
1 9904955 - Control Add-on Force 6100 Pre-wet Feeback Sensor Harness 322.00 322.00
only (Electric or Hyd)
1 9905737 - Force AMERICA ADD-ON - Custom Config File 222.00 222.00
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQT3
i
TRUCK 60U/PME/V7' Reference No.
TOWMASTER,61301 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
CO 258173PH:320.693-7900 Fx:320.693-7921 TF:800-462.4517
TOWMASTERTRUCK.COM
SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
PO#Salesman Terms Created Last Revised Appx Comp
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 1 6/11/20 1 7/23/20 1/15/22
Serial No.
1 9900874 - Filter Force IN-TANK mounted filter installed 459.00 459.00
1 9900882 - Reservoir TMTE Cabshield mt (stainless steel) w/intank 2,377.00 $2,377.00
filter provision, installed
1 9900886 - Pump Force EATON 421AK LS (4.67 ci) installed 3,261.00 $3,261.00
1 9905504 - Valve Force integrated float control (assist) valve and 927.00 927.00
switch system ("Blade-Saver") for PLOW
1 9900871 - Switch TMTE BODY UP Installed (electric controls only) 175.00 175.00
1 9900884 - Sensor Force Low oil indicator system, SLIM-LINE AND 235.00 235.00
CABSHIELD MOUNTED w/light mounted in cab, installed
1 9905014 - Hydraulic Valve Hose Guard installed 403.00 403.00
NOTE: STAINLESS STEEL BOLT-ON PAN BELOW VALVE ASSEMBLY
1 CUSTOM - Custom Equipment Pkg consisting of: 2,336.00 $2,336.00
1" single lane Stainless Steel Anti-Ice spray bar, with galvenized 2"
receiver type mount, spray nozzles, housing, plumbing, Three-way 12
VDC selector flow valve, installed off of rear hitch reciever,
plumbed to Hyd Pre-wet pump system for direct liquid application.
6100 Control config file setup for operation.
1 SPECIAL REQUEST - Special Request Charges for:
One button AUTO-RECALL feature added to FORCE 6100 Controller.
NOTE: THIS WILL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AUTO REVERSE LIFT FEATURE
ON THE SCRAPER. $N/C AS LONG AS SCRAPER IS PART OF ORDER.
2 9903370 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-3 carbide in rubber Flexible Plow Blade, 410.00 820.00
3' wear part only
Continued ---
Price:
Total Discounts:
Accepted by Date Net Cost:
Freight
Total:
TRKQ13
TRUCK 6l 7U/PMEA/T Reference No.
TOWMASTER,613B1 US HWY 12,LITCHFIELD,MN 55355
CO 258173PH:320-693-7900 Fx:320.693-7921 TF:BOO-462.4517
TOWMASTERTRUCKTOM
k SALES ORDER **
Ship To: Cust: 3280 Phone: Bill To: Phone:
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
1245 WEST HWY 96 1245 WEST HWY 96
ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 USA
ATTN: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461
CreatedPMSalesmanTermsLastRevisedAppx
CHRIS GUGGEMOS NET 30 DAYS 6/11/20 7/23/20 1/15/22
NOTE: FOR WING APPLICATION
4 9903371 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-4 carbide in rubber Flexible Plow Blade, 547.00 $2,188.00
4' wear part only
NOTE: (3) FOR FRONT PLOW, (1) FOR WING APPLICATION
2 9903372 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-ST3 Strap, 31, 1/2" x 3" x 36" CFSE 31.50 63.00
NOTE: FOR WING APPLICATION
4 9903373 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-ST4 Strap, 41, 1/2" x 3" x 48" CFSE 42.00 168.00
NOTE: (3) FOR FRONT PLOW, (1) FOR WING APPLICATION
2 9903374 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-BBW3 Base, 31, 1/2" x 4" x 36" FSB WABCO 54.00 108.00
12" CTR
NOTE: FOR WING APPLICATION
4 9903375 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-BBW4 Base, 41, 1/2" x 4" x 48" FSB WABCO 72.00 288.00
121, CTR
NOTE: (3) FOR FRONT PLOW, (1) FOR WING APPLICATION
2 9903376 - VBL EconoFLEX Attachment Kit (Bolts & Nuts) for up to 12' 108.00 216.00
assembly
NOTE: (1) FOR FRONT PLOW, (1) FOR WING APPLICATION
3 9903368 - VBL EconoFLEX J6K-V5 Curb Runner, RH/LH 65.00 195.00
NOTE: (2) FOR FRONT PLOW, (1) FOR WING APPLICATION
1 WARRANTY - TOWMASTER EXCLUSIVE WARRANTY: 5 yr Steel/Stainless Steel
Body Structure; 5 yr Whelen LED Light Systems; 3 yr Palfinger
Hoists; 4 yr SwapLoader Hoists; 1 year Swenson Spreaders, 2 yr Hyd,
FALLS Snow Equip, Tele Hoists, and all other items.
Price: 13 2,9 21.0 0
Total Discounts:
Accep `d,by Date Net Cost: 132,921.00
GVWU g Z 2 d ZU Freight
Total: 13 2,9 21.0 0
1'RKQ13
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Karth Lake Runoff Control Project - Contract Award
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources:
$180,000 $153,598.50 Surface Water Fund (50%)
RCWD Grant (50%)
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
•Resolution 2021-018 Accepting Bid and Awarding the Karth Lake Runoff Control
Project contract to Pember Companies, Inc. in the amount of $125,273.50.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Discussion
On March 23, 2020, the City Council approved a grant agreement with the Rice Creek
Watershed District for the Karth Lake Runoff Control project. The purpose of this project is to
address excessive erosion near the south end of Karth Lake caused by runoff from adjacent land
uses. Urban runoff is currently being directed down a steep slope to a city trail along the southern
boundary of Cummings Park. The grant agreement provides 50% funding from RCWD for the
project, up to a maximum amount of $90,000.
On April 27, 2020, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig
Engineering to complete project design, project manual, easement documents and construction
administration of the Karth Lake Runoff Control Project. On February 22, 2021 Council adopted
Resolution 2021-010 approving plans and specifications, bids were then ordered and opened on
Wednesday, March 31, 2021.
CONSENT ITEM – 6F
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
There was a total of four bids received. Attachment C shows the complete bid tabulation, the
following table lists the bidders name and their total bid:
Bidder Total Bid
Pember Companies, Inc. $125,273.50
Lametti & Sons, Inc. $135,960.00
Vinco Inc. $163,450.00
Northdale Construction Co. $227,086.50
The low bid was very similar to the Engineer’s estimate of $125,620.00.
Pember Companies, Inc. completed the Colleen Avenue Drainage Project in 2019, Lift Station
#11 Improvements project for the City, recommended contractor for the Hamline Avenue
Crosswalks and Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements this year, and has completed similar
projects successfully in the metro area. Attached is a letter (Attachment A) from Ulteig
recommending award to Pember as the lowest responsible/responsive bidder. Attachment B is
Resolution 2021-018 awarding the Karth Lake Runoff Control Project to Pember Companies in
the amount of $125,273.50. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-018.
Budget Impact
A summary of the estimated project costs and funding sources is provided below, and includes
funding from a grant agreement with RCWD for the proposed stormwater management
improvements.
Total Project Costs
Construction Cost $ 125,273.50
Engineering Services $ 19,834.00 (Includes Construction Admin.)
Materials Testing $ 7,600.00
Misc. (Legal, Ads) $ 891.00
TOTAL $ 153,598.50
Total Estimated Funding
RCWD (50% match) $ 76,799.25
Surface Water Mgmt Fund $ 76,799.25
TOTAL $ 153,598.50
The amounts listed above are estimates based on the current opinion of probable construction
costs. Final total expenses and funding amounts will be revised and presented to the City Council
upon receipt of construction bids.
Attachments
Attachment A: Ulteig Letter of Recommendation
Attachment B: Resolution 2021-018 Awarding the Contract
Attachment C: Bid Tabulation
Attachment D: Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for Construction Contract
4285 Lexington Avenue North Arden Hills, MN 55126 P: 651-415-3800 www.ulteig.com
$SULO
Dƌ͘ĂǀŝĚ^ǁĞĂƌŝŶŐƚŽŶ
/ŶƚĞƌŝŵWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ
ŝƚLJŽĨƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂ
ϭϮϰϱt,ŝŐŚǁĂLJϵϲ
ƌĚĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͕DEϱϱϭϭϮ
5H %LG$ZDUG5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ.DUWK/DNH5XQRII&RQWURO
'HDU0U6ZHDULQJHQ
%LGVRQWKHDERYHUHIHUHQFHGSURMHFWZHUHRSHQHGDWDPRQ0DUFK7KHUHZHUHIRXUELGGHUVIRUWKH
SURMHFWDWDEXODWLRQRIELGVUHFHLYHGLVSURYLGHGEHORZ7KHORZELGGHURQWKHSURMHFWLV3HPEHU&RPSDQLHV,QFZLWKD
WRWDOELGRI7KHHQJLQHHU¶VHVWLPDWHZDV
%LGGHU 7RWDO%LG
3HPEHU&RPSDQLHV,QF
/DPHWWL 6RQV,QF
9LQFR,QF
1RUWKGDOH&RQVWUXFWLRQ&R,QF
3HPEHU&RPSDQLHV,QFLVDUHSXWDEOHFRQWUDFWRUZLWKSUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHRQSURMHFWVRIWKLVQDWXUH%DVHGRQWKH
FRPSHWLWLYHELGVWKH&LW\UHFHLYHGZHUHFRPPHQGWKH&LW\RI$UGHQ+LOOVDZDUGWKHSURMHFWWR3HPEHU&RPSDQLHV,QF
,I\RXKDYHDQ\TXHVWLRQVUHJDUGLQJWKLVDZDUGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQSOHDVHFRQWDFWPHDW\RXUFRQYHQLHQFH
6LQFHUHO\
5RJHU$&OD\3(
6HQLRU(QJLQHHU
Roger Clay
Digitally signed by Roger
Clay
DN: CN=Roger Clay,
OU=Fargo, OU=Users,
OU=UEI, DC=UEI, DC=com
Date: 2021.04.05
15:31:29-05'00'
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-018
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT
FOR THE KARTH LAKE RUNOFF CONTROL PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Karth Lake Runoff Control
Project, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to the law, and the following bids
were received complying with the advertisement:
Pember Companies, Inc. $125,273.50
Lametti & Sons, Inc. $135,960.00
Vinco Inc. $163,450.00
Northdale Construction Co. $227,086.50
and;
WHEREAS, it appears that Pember Companies, Inc. of Menomonie, Wisconsin, is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills, Minnesota, that:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached
contract with Pember Companies, Inc. Menomonie, Wisconsin in the name of the City of
Arden Hills for the Karth Lake Runoff Control Project according to the plans and
specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder i shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS
12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Hanson, City Clerk
Abstract of BidsUEI Project No.19.00419Bid Letting: Wednesday, March 31, 2021Engineer's Estimate$125,620Karth Lake Runoff Control - PW 20-0111Arden Hills, MNNo. ItemAmount Unit Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total1 Mobilization1 LS 5,000.00 $5,000.00 12,800.00 $12,800.00 13,725.00 $13,725.00 7,500.00 $7,500.002 Clearing and Grubbing1 LS 1,200.00 $1,200.00 7,000.00 $7,000.00 20,000.00 $20,000.00 3,000.00 $3,000.003 Topsoil Stripping1 LS 2,500.00 $2,500.00 1,000.00 $1,000.00 2,100.00 $2,100.00 5,000.00 $5,000.004 Remove Bituminous Pavement 34 SY 50.00 $1,700.00 10.00 $340.00 20.00 $680.00 5.00 $170.005 Remove Concrete Structure 1 LS 2,500.00 $2,500.00 1,500.00 $1,500.00 10,500.00 $10,500.00 3,000.00 $3,000.006 Remove Grouted Riprap1 LS 2,700.00 $2,700.00 1,500.00 $1,500.00 5,250.00 $5,250.00 750.00 $750.007 Remove 18" CPP Storm Sewer 1 LS 1,500.00 $1,500.00 850.00 $850.00 5,250.00 $5,250.00 1,200.00 $1,200.008 Common Excavation (CV) 100 CY 50.00 $5,000.00 35.00 $3,500.00 70.00 $7,000.00 10.00 $1,000.009 Aggregate Base (CV) Class 5 10 CY 40.00 $400.00 80.00 $800.00 55.40 $554.00 20.00 $200.0010 Concrete Inlet Structure1 Each 39,000.00 $39,000.00 28,500.00 $28,500.00 18,150.00 $18,150.00 71,165.00 $71,165.0011 24" RC Storm Sewer Pipe Class 3 170 LF 120.00 $20,400.00 75.00 $12,750.00 114.06 $19,390.20 130.00 $22,100.0012 36"x22" Arch RC Storm Sewer Pipe Class 3 50 LF 200.00 $10,000.00 169.00 $8,450.00 165.66 $8,283.00 150.00 $7,500.0013 36"x22" Arch RC Pipe Apron 1 Each 2,600.00 $2,600.00 1,650.00 $1,650.00 2,629.38 $2,629.38 6,500.00 $6,500.0014 Storm Manhole 60"4 VF 1,000.00 $4,000.00 950.00 $3,800.00 2,263.13 $9,052.52 1,500.00 $6,000.0015 Storm Manhole 84"8 VF 1,200.00 $9,600.00 950.00 $7,600.00 6,895.00 $55,160.00 1,175.00 $9,400.0016 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer 1 Each 800.00 $800.00 700.00 $700.00 5,250.00 $5,250.00 1,500.00 $1,500.0017 Pipe Bedding Material10 CY 40.00 $400.00 80.00 $800.00 84.00 $840.00 30.00 $300.0018 Safety Grate for 36-in Arch RC Apron 1 Each 2,200.00 $2,200.00 1,600.00 $1,600.00 2,374.00 $2,374.00 2,000.00 $2,000.0019 Random Rip Rap (Class III) 90 CY 100.00 $9,000.00 130.00 $11,700.00 183.76 $16,538.40 55.00 $4,950.0020 Install Type III Barricade 6' Wide 2 Each 800.00 $1,600.00 300.00 $600.00 787.50 $1,575.00 750.00 $1,500.0021 Turf Reinforcement Mat Type Category 2 640 SY 16.00 $10,240.00 14.60 $9,344.00 15.75 $10,080.00 6.00 $3,840.0022 Filter Log Type Straw Bioroll 100 LF 2.00 $200.00 3.00 $300.00 10.50 $1,050.00 3.00 $300.0023 Turf Establishement1 LS 2,200.00 $2,200.00 7,000.00 $7,000.00 5,250.00 $5,250.00 3,000.00 $3,000.0024 Erosion Control Blanket Category 3 510 SY 2.00 $1,020.00 1.45 $739.50 10.50 $5,355.00 2.50 $1,275.0025 Silt Fence, Type HI100 LF 2.00 $200.00 4.50 $450.00 10.50 $1,050.00 3.00 $300.00$135,960.00 $125,273.50 $227,086.50 $163,450.00TOTAL PROJECT BIDPember Companies Inc. Northdale Construction Co., Inc.Menomonie, Wisconsin Albertville, MinnesotaVinco Inc.Forest Lake, MinnesotaLametti & Sons, Inc.Hugo, Minnesota
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR
CONSTUCTION CONTRACT
Karth Lake Runoff Control
City Project PW-20-0111 27
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 12th day of April, 2021 (hereinafter “Effective Date of the Contract”) by and
between the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota (hereinafter “Owner”) and Pember Companies
Inc (hereinafter “Contractor”). The Owner and Contractor hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 – THE WORK AND THE PROJECT
1.01
1.02
Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is
generally described as follows: Insert general description of project elements
The Project, of which the Work under the Contract Documents is a part is generally described as
follows: Karth Lake Runoff Control Project, City Project No. PW-20-0111.
ARTICLE 2 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
2.01 The Contract Documents consist of the following:
A.This Agreement
B.Performance and Payment Bonds
C.Insurance Certificates
D.Instructions to Bidders
E.General Conditions
F.Supplementary Conditions
G.Division 1 – General Requirements
H.Division 2 – Special Provisions
I.Drawings (not attached by incorporated by reference) consisting of 8 sheets with each sheet
dated December 29,2020.
J.Addenda (Numbers _ and _ inclusive)
K.Exhibits to the Agreement
1.Contractor’s Bid (pages _ to _ inclusive)
2.Non-Collusion Affidavit
3.Responsible Contractor Verification and Certification of Compliance Form
L.The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract
and are not attached hereto:
1.Notice to Proceed
2.Work Change Directives
3.Change Orders
4.Field Orders
2.02 This instrument, together with the documents hereinabove mentioned, form the Agreement, and they
are as fully a part of the Agreement as if hereto attached or herein repeated.
2.03 The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified, or supplemented as provided in the
General Conditions and Supplemental Conditions.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT TIMES
3.01
3.02
Contract Times: The Work will be substantially completed on or before October 15, 2021 and
completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 15.06 of the General
Conditions on or before October 29, 2021. Substantial Completion Date shall be defined as the
completion of all items with the exception of some punch list items and removal of erosion/sediment
control.
All time limits for Milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for final
payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR
CONSTUCTION CONTRACT
Karth Lake Runoff Control
City Project PW-20-0111 28
3.03 Liquidated Damages: Contractor and Owner recognize that time is of the essence as stated above
and that Owner will suffer financial and other losses if the Work is not completed and Milestones not
achieved within the times specified in Paragraph 3.01 abov e, plus any extensions thereof allowed in
accordance with the Contract. The parties also recognize that delays, expense, and difficulties
involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work
is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor
agree that as liquidated damages for delay, but not as a penalty;
A.Substantial Completion: Contractor shall pay Owner $200.00 for each day that expires after the
time specified in Paragraph 3.01 above for Substantial Completion until the Work is substantially
complete, as duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract.
B.Completion of Remaining Work: After Substantial Completion, if Contractor shall neglect, refuse,
or fail to complete the remaining Work within the Contract Time for completion and readiness for
final payment, as duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract, Contractor shall pay Owner $300.00 for
each day that expires after such time until the Work is completed and ready for final payment.
C.Liquidated damages for failing to timely attain Substantial Completion and final completion are
not additive and will not be imposed concurrently.
ARTICLE 4 – CONTRACT PRICES
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
The Owner shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement according to the schedule
of approximate quantities and unit prices as set out in the Contract Documents submitted by the
Contractor on March 31, 2021, the aggregate of which is estimated to be $125.273.50.
The Contract shall include all items as provided on the Proposal Form.
Payment is based an amount equal to the sum of the extended prices, established for each separately
identified item of Unit Price Work by multiplying the unit price times the actual quantity of that item
completed and accepted by the Engineer.
The extended prices for Unit Price Work set forth as of the Effective Date of the Contract are based
on estimated quantities. As provided in Paragraph 13.03 of the General Conditions, estimated
quantities are not guaranteed, and determination of actual quantities and classifications are to be
made by the Engineer.
ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENT PROCEDURES
5.01 Progress Payments: Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the
basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment on or about the 10th day of each month during
performance of the Work as provided in Paragraph 5.02 below, provided that such Applications for
Payment have been submitted in a timely manner and otherwise meet the requirements of the
Contract. All such payments will be measured by the Schedule of Values established as provided in
the General Conditions (and in the case of Unit Price Work based on the number of units completed)
or, in the event there is no Schedule of Values, as provided elsewhere in the Contract.
5.02 Retainage: Prior to Substantial Completion, progress payments will be made in an amount equal to
the percentage indicated below but, in each case, less the aggregate of payments previously made
and less such amounts as Owner may withhold, including but not limited to liquidated damages, in
accordance with the Contract.
A.Ninety five (95) percent of Work completed (with the balance being retainage). If the Work has
been 50 percent completed as determined by E ngineer, and if the character and progress of the
Work has been satisfactory to Owner and Engineer, then as long as the character and progress
of the Work remain satisfactory to Owner and Engineer, there will be no additional retainage; and
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR
CONSTUCTION CONTRACT
Karth Lake Runoff Control
City Project PW-20-0111 29
B.Fifty (50) percent of cost of materials and equipment not incorporated in the Work (with the
balance being retainage).
5.03 Upon Substantial Completion, Owner shall pay an amount sufficient to increase total payments to
Contractor to 100 percent of the Work completed, less such amounts set-off by Owner pursuant to
Paragraph 15.01E of the General Conditions, and less 200 percent of Engineer’s estimate of the value
of Work to be completed or corrected as shown on the punch list of items to be completed or corrected
prior to final payment.
5.04 Final Payment: Upon final completion and acceptance of the Work in accordance with Paragraph
15.06 of the General Conditions, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Prices as
recommended by Engineer as provided in said Paragraph 15.06.
ARTICLE 6 – CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS
6.01 In order to induce the Owner to enter into this Contract, Contractor makes the following
representations:
A.Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents, and any data and
reference identified in the Contract Documents.
B.Contractor has visited the Site, conducted a thorough, alert visual examination of the Site and
adjacent areas, and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site
conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
C.Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all laws and regulations that may affect cost,
progress, and performance of the Work.
D.Contractor has carefully studied all reports of explorations and t ests of subsurface conditions at
or adjacent to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or
subsurface structures at the Site that have been identified in the Contract Documents, and reports
relating to Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any, at or adjacent to the Site that have been
identified in the Contract Documents.
E.Contractor has considered the information known to Contractor itself; information commonly
known to contractors doing business in the locality of th e Site; information and observations
obtained from visits to the Site; the Contract Documents; and the site-related reports identified in
the Contract Documents, with respect to the effect of such information, observation, and
documents on (1) the cost, progress and performance of the Work; (2) the means, methods,
techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by the Contractor; and
(3) Contractor’s safety precautions and programs.
F.Based on the information and observations referred to in the preceding paragraph, Contractor
agrees that no further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are
necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and
in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract.
G.Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the
Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents.
H.Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies
that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by
Engineer is acceptable to Contractor.
I.The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey un derstanding of all
terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR
CONSTUCTION CONTRACT
Karth Lake Runoff Control
City Project PW-20-0111 30
J.Contractor’s entry into this Contract constitutes an incontrovertible representation by Contractor
that without exception all prices in the Agreement are premised upon perf orming and furnishing
the Work required by the Contract Documents.
ARTICLE 7 – MISCELLANEOUS
7.01 Terms: Terms used in the Agreement will have the meanings stated in the General Conditions and
Supplementary Conditions.
7.02 Assignment of Contract: Unless expressly agreed to elsewhere in the Contract, no assignment by a
party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract will be binding on another party hereto
without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, spec ifically but without limitation,
money that may become due and money that is due may not be assigned without such consent
(except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically
stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge
the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents.
7.03 Successors and Assigns: Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its successors, assigns, and legal
representatives to the other party hereto, its successors, assigns, and legal representatives in respect
to all covenants, agreements, and obligations in the Contact Documents.
7.04 Severability: Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under
any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid
and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed
to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes
as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision.
7.05 Contractor’s Certifications
A.The provisions of Minn. Stat. 16C.285 Responsible Contractor are imposed as a requirement of
this Contract. This Contract may be terminated by the Owner at any time upon discovery by the
Owner that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath
verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in the Statute.
B.The provisions of Minn. Stat. 471.425, subdivision 4a regarding payments to subcontractors are
imposed as a requirement of this Contract.
REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS BLANK
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR
CONSTUCTION CONTRACT
Karth Lake Runoff Control
City Project PW-20-0111 31
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and Contractor have caused this instrument to be executed in duplicate as
of the Effective Date of the Contract.
OWNER: CONTRACTOR:
City of Arden Hills
By: By:
Title: Mayor Title:
Attest: Attest:
Title: City Clerk Title:
Address for Giving Notices: Address for Giving Notices:
City of Arden Hills
Attention: Public Works Director
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements -
Contract Award
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources:
$210,000.00 $213,507.35 PIR, Ramsey County Participation &
Surface Water Fund
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Resolution 2021-019 Accepting Bid and Awarding the Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and
Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Contract to Pember Companies, Inc. in the
amount of $133,421.65.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Background/Discussion
On February 25, 2019, the City Council approved a professional services contract with HR
Green for Hamline Avenue Crosswalk Improvements. On February 24, 2020, the City Council
approved a professional services agreement with HR Green for the design of the City Hall
Parking Lot & Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements which would also include the Hamline
Avenue Crosswalks all in one plan set. On December 14, 2020, the City Council amended the
professional services agreement to split the plans into two separate plans, one of which is the
presented Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements.
On February 8, 2021, plans and specifications were approved by the City Council and bids were
opened on Wednesday, March 17, 2021.
CONSENT ITEM – 6G
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
There was a total of six bids received (Attachment C). The following table lists the bidders name
and their total bid:
Bidder Total Bid
Pember Companies, Inc. $133,421.65
Forest Lake Contracting $145,340.00
Goodmason Construction $152,396.00
Standard Contracting $157,672.05
Bituminous Roadways Inc. $159,724.00
Astech Corp. $165,893.03
Urban Companies $171,058.50
All bids are lower than the Engineer’s estimate which is $189,065.00.
Pember Companies, Inc. completed the Colleen Ave Drainage Improvement project in 2019 and
Lift Station #11 Improvements project for the City and has completed similar projects
successfully in the metro area. Attached is a letter (Attachment A) from HR Green
recommending award to Pember as the lowest responsible/responsive bidder. Attachment B is
Resolution 2021-019 awarding the Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and Shorewood Drive Drainage
Improvements to Pember Companies in the amount of $133,421.65. Staff recommends adoption
of Resolution 2021-019.
Budget Impact
On October 29th, 2020, the City of Arden Hills entered into a Cooperative and Maintenance
Agreement PW2020-16 with Ramsey County for Pedestrian Modification Work on Hamline
Avenue. Within the Agreement it describes a cost share split of 50/50 between the City and the
County.
Project Budget:
Hamline Ave Crosswalks $120,000.00 (estimated $60,000 Ramsey County participation)
Shorewood Drive Drainage $ 90,000.00
Budget Total $210,000.00
Actual Costs:
Construction Contract 133,421.65$
Design 66,343.40$
Materials Testing 6,293.00$
Construction Admin 6,900.00$
Misc (Legal, Ads)549.30$
Construction Total 213,507.35$
Attachments
Attachment A: HR Green Letter of Recommendation
Attachment B: Resolution 2021-019 Awarding the Contract
Attachment C: Bid Tabulation
Attachment D: Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for Construction Contract
2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114
Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446
HRGREEN.COM
April 5, 2021
Mr. David Swearingen
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
SUBJECT: Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvement Project | SP 164-090-015 | PW-20-0103
Dear Mr. Swearingen,
On February 18th, 2021 the City Council received plans and specifications for the Hamline Avenue and
Shorewood Drive Improvement projects, City project PW-20-0103 and authorized advertisement for bids.
On March 17th, 2021 the City of Arden Hills received bids for the Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive
Improvement projects. The results were verified by City-consultant, HR Green. Seven (7) bids were received and
ranged between $133,421.65 and $171,058.50. The following is a bid summary:
Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $159,724.00
Astech Copr. $165,893.03
Forest Lake Contracting $145,340.00
Goodmason Construction $152,396.00
Pember Construction $133,421.65
Standard Construction $157,672.05
Urban Companies $171,058.50
All the bids were lower than the engineer’s estimate of $189,065.00. The low bid price was 29.5% lower than the
engineer’s estimate.
After a thorough review of the bids received, we feel that the engineer’s estimate, along with the low bid, was
comparatively accurate, aside from a few bid items. The project is not a typical project due to the localized nature
of each project.
The engineer’s estimate was based on previous projects and historical data. The mobilization, dewatering, and
the clearing and grubbing were almost all of the difference between the estimate and Pember Construction’s bid.
In our opinion, the mobilization was going to be a bid item that the prime contractor would insulate because the
project was separate between different locations that are not that relatively close. Therefore, it was assumed that
the mobilization cost would be driven up.
2
The clearing and grubbing and dewatering items can often be difficult to estimate because they are specialized
items. Often, the clearing and grubbing estimates can get relatively high because simple removals can be
determined to be difficult because of site restrictions not foreseen by anyone who is not used tree removal.
Dewatering cost estimates fluctuate from project to project because the contractor will try to low bid that unit price
and risk the timing of the project and the elevation of the high water. Sometimes, they have very efficient and
effective ways of constructing the design under high water levels as well.
Upon further examination of the apparent low bid, the bid provided by Pember Construction was found to be
responsive and not materially unbalanced.
Staff recommends Council accept the bids, awarding the contract to Pember Construction for the 2021 Hamline
Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvement projects, City Project PW-20-0103.
HR GREEN, INC
Jordan Horejsi, PE
Project Manager
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-019
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT
FOR THE HAMLINE AVENUE CROSSWALKS AND SHOREWOOD DRIVE DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and
Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Project, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according
to the law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Pember Companies, Inc. $133,421.65
Forest Lake Contracting $145,340.00
Goodmason Construction $152,396.00
Standard Contracting $157,672.05
Bituminous Roadways Inc. $159,724.00
Astech Corp. $165,893.03
Urban Companies $171,058.50
and;
WHEREAS, it appears that Pember Companies, Inc. of Menomonie, Wisconsin, is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract
with Pember Companies, Inc. Menomonie, Wisconsin in the name of the City of Arden Hills for
the Hamline Avenue Crosswalks and Shorewood Drive Drainage Improvements Project
according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits
made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder i
shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 12TH
DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
____________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Hanson, City Clerk
UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
2 2051.501 MAINT & RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS LUMP SUM 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 695.00 $ 695.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
3 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 3 $ 900.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 4,050.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 3,450.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 10,500.00
4 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 3 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 $ 700.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 505.00 $ 1,515.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00
5 2102.518 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SQ FT 208 $ 4.40 $ 915.20 $ 3.00 $ 624.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,040.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,040.00 $ 4.25 $ 884.00 $ 4.20 $ 873.60 $ 7.00 $ 1,456.00 $ 10.00 $ 2,080.00
6 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1 $ 1,320.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00
7 2104.502 REMOVE BITUMINOUS FLUME EACH 1 $ 495.00 $ 495.00 $ 740.00 $ 740.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 415.00 $ 415.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00
8 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH 6 $ 44.00 $ 264.00 $ 115.00 $ 690.00 $ 45.00 $ 270.00 $ 80.00 $ 480.00 $ 43.00 $ 258.00 $ 58.00 $ 348.00 $ 70.00 $ 420.00 $ 75.00 $ 450.00
9 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 190 $ 3.00 $ 570.00 $ 4.00 $ 760.00 $ 7.00 $ 1,330.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,520.00 $ 4.25 $ 807.50 $ 5.00 $ 950.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 13.00 $ 2,470.00
10 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 87 $ 17.60 $ 1,531.20 $ 23.00 $ 2,001.00 $ 12.00 $ 1,044.00 $ 11.00 $ 957.00 $ 7.75 $ 674.25 $ 11.25 $ 978.75 $ 15.00 $ 1,305.00 $ 10.00 $ 870.00
11 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB LIN FT 43 $ 11.00 $ 473.00 $ 12.00 $ 516.00 $ 16.00 $ 688.00 $ 10.00 $ 430.00 $ 3.85 $ 165.55 $ 6.50 $ 279.50 $ 10.00 $ 430.00 $ 5.00 $ 215.00
12 2105.503 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 13 $ 20.00 $ 260.00 $ 34.00 $ 442.00 $ 60.00 $ 780.00 $ 25.00 $ 325.00 $ 10.00 $ 130.00 $ 25.00 $ 325.00 $ 75.00 $ 975.00 $ 15.00 $ 195.00
13 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 36 $ 38.50 $ 1,386.00 $ 41.00 $ 1,476.00 $ 28.00 $ 1,008.00 $ 15.00 $ 540.00 $ 21.00 $ 756.00 $ 20.15 $ 725.40 $ 27.00 $ 972.00 $ 10.00 $ 360.00
14 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 312 $ 17.60 $ 5,491.20 $ 9.50 $ 2,964.00 $ 26.00 $ 8,112.00 $ 14.00 $ 4,368.00 $ 18.00 $ 5,616.00 $ 11.20 $ 3,494.40 $ 9.00 $ 2,808.00 $ 10.00 $ 3,120.00
15 2104.603 REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT 87 $ 21.23 $ 1,847.01 $ 68.00 $ 5,916.00 $ 55.00 $ 4,785.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,175.00 $ 36.25 $ 3,153.75 $ 40.00 $ 3,480.00 $ 55.00 $ 4,785.00 $ 75.00 $ 6,525.00
16 2105.601 DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
17 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD 30 $ 82.50 $ 2,475.00 $ 125.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 98.00 $ 2,940.00 $ 75.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 75.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 65.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 100.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 3,000.00
18 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD 48 $ 100.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 60.00 $ 2,880.00 $ 110.00 $ 5,280.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 71.00 $ 3,408.00 $ 73.00 $ 3,504.00 $ 75.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 80.00 $ 3,840.00
19 2301.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPOXY COATED) EACH 17 $ 11.00 $ 187.00 $ 20.00 $ 340.00 $ 13.00 $ 221.00 $ 30.00 $ 510.00 $ 11.30 $ 192.10 $ 18.40 $ 312.80 $ 25.00 $ 425.00 $ 17.00 $ 289.00
20 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 41 $ 139.70 $ 5,727.70 $ 135.00 $ 5,535.00 $ 165.00 $ 6,765.00 $ 220.00 $ 9,020.00 $ 255.00 $ 10,455.00 $ 195.00 $ 7,995.00 $ 200.00 $ 8,200.00 $ 120.00 $ 4,920.00
21 2411.502 CONCRETE FLUME EACH 1 $ 715.00 $ 715.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 365.00 $ 365.00 $ 1,840.00 $ 1,840.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
22 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 LIN FT 25 $ 88.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 225.00 $ 5,625.00 $ 70.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 160.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 85.00 $ 2,125.00 $ 245.00 $ 6,125.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 80.00 $ 2,000.00
23 2504.604 WATERMAIN INSULATION SQ YD 3 $ 88.00 $ 264.00 $ 45.00 $ 135.00 $ 50.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 50.00 $ 150.00 $ 110.00 $ 330.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 75.00 $ 225.00
24 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 EACH 2 $ 5,280.00 $ 10,560.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 5,685.00 $ 11,370.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 4,800.00
25 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $ 1,760.00 $ 3,520.00 $ 555.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 745.00 $ 1,490.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00
26 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS II CU YD 4 $ 150.00 $ 600.00 $ 145.00 $ 580.00 $ 150.00 $ 600.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.00 $ 185.00 $ 740.00 $ 145.00 $ 580.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 150.00 $ 600.00
27 2521.618 CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 803 $ 13.64 $ 10,952.92 $ 15.00 $ 12,045.00 $ 17.00 $ 13,651.00 $ 17.00 $ 13,651.00 $ 19.00 $ 15,257.00 $ 13.55 $ 10,880.65 $ 17.50 $ 14,052.50 $ 12.00 $ 9,636.00
28 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B612 LIN FT 65 $ 52.60 $ 3,419.00 $ 36.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 58.00 $ 3,770.00 $ 55.00 $ 3,575.00 $ 45.00 $ 2,925.00 $ 33.55 $ 2,180.75 $ 55.00 $ 3,575.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,950.00
29 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 17 $ 160.60 $ 2,730.20 $ 135.00 $ 2,295.00 $ 180.00 $ 3,060.00 $ 125.00 $ 2,125.00 $ 92.00 $ 1,564.00 $ 130.00 $ 2,210.00 $ 140.00 $ 2,380.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,020.00
30 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 229 $ 40.70 $ 9,320.30 $ 40.00 $ 9,160.00 $ 42.00 $ 9,618.00 $ 55.00 $ 12,595.00 $ 50.00 $ 11,450.00 $ 35.75 $ 8,186.75 $ 55.00 $ 12,595.00 $ 45.00 $ 10,305.00
31 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 103 $ 60.50 $ 6,231.50 $ 65.00 $ 6,695.00 $ 65.00 $ 6,695.00 $ 40.00 $ 4,120.00 $ 62.00 $ 6,386.00 $ 63.00 $ 6,489.00 $ 50.00 $ 5,150.00 $ 50.00 $ 5,150.00
32 2557.603 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 13 $ 22.00 $ 286.00 $ 40.00 $ 520.00 $ 65.00 $ 845.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 30.00 $ 390.00 $ 40.25 $ 523.25 $ 100.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 15.00 $ 195.00
33 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $ 1,980.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
34 2563.601 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE LUMP SUM 1 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,575.00 $ 1,575.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
35 2564.502 OBJECT MARKER TYPE X4-2 EACH 4 $ 165.00 $ 660.00 $ 335.00 $ 1,340.00 $ 160.00 $ 640.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 160.00 $ 640.00 $ 157.50 $ 630.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 90.00 $ 360.00
36 2564.618 SIGN TYPE C SQ FT 70 $ 60.50 $ 4,235.00 $ 50.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 60.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 57.75 $ 4,042.50 $ 70.00 $ 4,900.00 $ 75.00 $ 5,250.00
37 2565.616 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM SYS 1 $ 21,010.00 $ 21,010.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 10,540.00 $ 10,540.00 $ 35,442.75 $ 35,442.75 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
38 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 7 $ 220.00 $ 1,540.00 $ 510.00 $ 3,570.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 250.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 120.00 $ 840.00 $ 180.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 400.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 175.00 $ 1,225.00
39 2573.503 SILT FENCE. TYPE HI LIN FT 27 $ 4.40 $ 118.80 $ 57.00 $ 1,539.00 $ 13.00 $ 351.00 $ 45.00 $ 1,215.00 $ 4.00 $ 108.00 $ 13.85 $ 373.95 $ 20.00 $ 540.00 $ 5.00 $ 135.00
40 2573.503 SILT FENCE. TYPE TB LIN FT 15 $ 35.00 $ 525.00 $ 115.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 18.00 $ 270.00 $ 60.00 $ 900.00 $ 3.50 $ 52.50 $ 28.00 $ 420.00 $ 20.00 $ 300.00 $ 10.00 $ 150.00
41 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND 6 $ 11.00 $ 66.00 $ 225.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 45.00 $ 270.00 $ 60.00 $ 360.00 $ 4.00 $ 24.00 $ 5.00 $ 30.00 $ 20.00 $ 120.00 $ 10.00 $ 60.00
42 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 4 POUND 1 $ 11.00 $ 11.00 $ 225.00 $ 225.00 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
43 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N SQ YD 13 $ 10.00 $ 130.00 $ 35.00 $ 455.00 $ 27.00 $ 351.00 $ 10.00 $ 130.00 $ 5.00 $ 65.00 $ 10.00 $ 130.00 $ 30.00 $ 390.00 $ 10.00 $ 130.00
44 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 POUND 2 $ 5.00 $ 10.00 $ 555.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 125.00 $ 250.00 $ 40.00 $ 80.00 $ 20.00 $ 40.00 $ 32.00 $ 64.00 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 $ 65.00 $ 130.00
45 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 33-261 POUND 0.2 $ 200.00 $ 40.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 230.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 40.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00 $ 585.00 $ 117.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00
46 2575.602 SITE RESTORATION EACH 4 $ 3,619.00 $ 14,476.00 $ 685.00 $ 2,740.00 $ 600.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 640.00 $ 2,560.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 950.00 $ 3,800.00
67 $ 165,893.03 $ 159,724.00 $ 145,340.00 $ 152,396.00 $ 133,421.65 $ 157,672.05 $ 171,058.50 $ 189,065.00
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
To provide all materials, labor, equipment and incidentals necessary for SAP 062-650-014, All in
accordance with the provided specifications and drawings.
HAMLINE AVENUE AND SHOREWOOD DR PROJECT
BID FORM
CITY PROJECT PW-20-0103
ASTECH CORP.BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC.
EST. QUANTITYUNITITEMITEM NO. NO.
FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING GOODMASON CONSTRUCTION PEMBER CONSTRUCTION STANDARD CONTRACTING ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEURBAN COMPANIES
Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements AGREEMENT
PW-20-0103 1 of 5
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 12th day of April, 2021 (hereinafter “Effective Date of the Contract”) by
and between the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota (hereinafter “Owner”) and Pember
Companies Inc. (hereinafter “Contractor”). The Owner and Contractor hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 – THE WORK AND THE PROJECT
1.01 Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work
is generally described as follows: Street and storm sewer reconstruction, pedestrian crosswalk
improvements, storm sewer improvements, and restoration as outlined in the project plan set
drawings.
1.02 The Project, of which the Work under the Contract Documents is a part is generally described as
follows: Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements, City Project No. PW -20-0103.
ARTICLE 2 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
2.01 The Contract Documents consist of the following:
A.This Agreement
B.Performance and Payment Bonds
C.Insurance Certificates
D.Instructions to Bidders
E.General Conditions
F.Supplementary Conditions
G.Division 1 – General Requirements
H.Division 2 – Special Provisions
I.Drawings (not attached by incorporated by reference) consisting of 41 sheets, dated
01/19/2021.
J.Addenda (Numbers _ and _ inclusive)
K.Exhibits to the Agreement
1.Contractor’s Bid (pages _ to _ inclusive)
2.Non-Collusion Affidavit
3.Responsible Contractor Verification and Certification of Compliance Form
L.The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the
Contract and are not attached hereto:
1.Notice to Proceed
2.Work Change Directives
3.Change Orders
4.Field Orders
2.02 This instrument, together with the documents hereinabove mentioned, form the Agreement, and
they are as fully a part of the Agreement as if hereto attached or herein repeated.
2.03 The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified, or supplemented as provided in the
General Conditions and Supplemental Conditions.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT TIMES
3.01 Contract Times: The Work will be substantially completed on or before October 15, 2021, and
completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 15.06 of the General
Conditions on or before October 29, 2021. Substantial Completion Date shall be defined as the
completion of all items, including wear course paving and turf restoration, with the exception of
some punch list items, removal of traffic control, and removal of erosion/sediment control.
Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements AGREEMENT
PW-20-0103 2 of 5
3.02 Liquidated Damages: Contractor and Owner recognize that time is of the essence as stated above
and that Owner will suffer financial and other losses if the Work is not completed and Milestones
not achieved within the times specified in Paragraph 3.01 above, plus any extensions thereof
allowed in accordance with the Contract. The parties also recognize that delays, expense, and
difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner
if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and
Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay, but not as a penalty;
A.Substantial Completion: Contractor shall pay Owner $1,500.00 for each day that expires after
the time specified in Paragraph 3.01 above for Substantial Completion until the Work is
substantially complete, as duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract.
B.Completion of Remaining Work: After Substantial Completion, if Contractor shall neglect,
refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work within the Contract Time for completion and
readiness for final payment, as duly adjusted pursuant to the Contract, Con tractor shall pay
Owner $500.00 for each day that expires after such time until the Work is completed and ready
for final payment.
C.Liquidated damages for failing to timely attain Substantial Completion and final completion are
not additive and will not be imposed concurrently.
ARTICLE 4 – CONTRACT PRICES
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
The Owner shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement according to the
schedule of approximate quantities and unit prices as set out in the Contract Documents
submitted by the Contractor on March 17, 2021, the aggregate of which is estimated to be
$133,421.65.
The Contract shall include all items as provided on the Proposal Form.
Payment is based an amount equal to the sum of the extended prices, established for each
separately identified item of Unit Price Work by multiplying the unit price times the actual quantity
of that item completed and accepted by the Engineer.
The extended prices for Unit Price Work set forth as of the Effective Date of the Contract are
based on estimated quantities. As provided in Paragraph 13.03 of the General Conditions,
estimated quantities are not guaranteed, and determination of actual quantities and classifications
are to be made by the Engineer.
ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENT PROCEDURES
5.01 Progress Payments: Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Price on
the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment on or about the 10th day of each month during
performance of the Work as provided in Paragraph 5.02 below, provided that such Applications for
Payment have been submitted in a timely manner and otherwise meet the requirements of the
Contract. All such payments will be measured by the Schedule of Values established as provided
in the General Conditions (and in the case of Unit Price Work based on the number of units
completed) or, in the event there is no Schedule of Values, as provided elsewhere in the Contract.
5.02 Retainage: Prior to Substantial Completion, progress payments will be made in an amount equal
to the percentage indicated below but, in each case, less the aggregate of payments previously
made and less such amounts as Owner may withhold, including but not limited to liquidated
damages, in accordance with the Contract.
A.Ninety-five (95) percent of Work completed (with the balance being retainage); and
B.No payment shall be made for materials and equipment not incorporated into the Work.
5.03 Upon Substantial Completion, Owner shall pay an amount sufficient to increase total payments to
Contractor to 100 percent of the Work completed, less such am ounts set-off by Owner pursuant to
Paragraph 15.01E of the General Conditions, and less 200 percent of Engineer’s estimate of the
Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements AGREEMENT
PW-20-0103 3 of 5
value of Work to be completed or corrected as shown on the punch list of items to be completed or
corrected prior to final payment.
5.04 Final Payment: Upon final completion and acceptance of the Work in accordance with Paragraph
15.06 of the General Conditions, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Prices as
recommended by Engineer as provided in said Paragraph 15.06.
ARTICLE 6 – CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS
6.01 In order to induce the Owner to enter into this Contract, Contractor makes the following
representations:
A.Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents, and any data and
reference identified in the Contract Documents.
B.Contractor has visited the Site, conducted a thorough, alert visual examination of the Site and
adjacent areas, and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site
conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
C.Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all laws and regulations that may affect cost,
progress, and performance of the Work.
D.Contractor has carefully studied all reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions
at or adjacent to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or
subsurface structures at the Site that have been identified in the Contract Documents, and
reports relating to Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any, at or adjacent to t he Site that
have been identified in the Contract Documents.
E.Contractor has considered the information known to Contractor itself; information commonly
known to contractors doing business in the locality of the Site; information and observations
obtained from visits to the Site; the Contract Documents; and the site-related reports identified
in the Contract Documents, with respect to the effect of such information, observation, and
documents on (1) the cost, progress and performance of the Work; (2) the mea ns, methods,
techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by the Contractor; and
(3) Contractor’s safety precautions and programs.
F.Based on the information and observations referred to in the preceding paragraph, Contractor
agrees that no further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are
necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times,
and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract.
G.Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the
Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents.
H.Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or
discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written
resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor.
I.The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all
terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work.
J.Contractor’s entry into this Contract constitutes an incontrovertible representation by
Contractor that without exception all prices in the Agreement are premised upon performing
and furnishing the Work required by the Contract Documents.
ARTICLE 7 – MISCELLANEOUS
7.01 Terms: Terms used in the Agreement will have the meanings stated in the General Conditions and
Supplementary Conditions.
7.02 Assignment of Contract: Unless expressly agreed to elsewhere in the Co ntract, no assignment by
a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract will be binding on another party hereto
without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, specifically but without limitation,
Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements AGREEMENT
PW-20-0103 4 of 5
money that may become due and money that is due may not be assigned without such consent
(except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically
stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will re lease or
discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents.
7.03 Successors and Assigns: Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its successors, assigns, and
legal representatives to the other party hereto, its successors , assigns, and legal representatives
in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations in the Contact Documents.
7.04 Severability: Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable
under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue
to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall
be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provis ion
that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision.
7.05 Contractor’s Certifications
A.The provisions of Minn. Stat. 16C.285 Responsible Contractor are imposed as a requirement
of this Contract. This Contract may be terminated by the Owner at any time upon discovery by
the Owner that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under
oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in the Statute.
B.The provisions of Minn. Stat. 471.425, subdivision 4a regarding payments to subcontractors
are imposed as a requirement of this Contract.
REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS BLANK
Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements AGREEMENT
PW-20-0103 5 of 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and Contractor have caused this instrument to be executed in duplicate
as of the Effective Date of the Contract.
OWNER: CONTRACTOR:
City of Arden Hills
By: By:
Title: Mayor Title:
Attest: Attest:
Title: City Clerk Title:
Address for Giving Notices: Address for Giving Notices:
City of Arden Hills
Attention: Public Works Director
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Page 1 of 2
CONSENT ITEM – 6H
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: Jane Kansier, AICP, Consulting Planner
SUBJECT: PC21-004 – Development Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding with
Kensington Development for Construction of Temporary Traffic Signal
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
A Development Agreement with Kensington Development to allow the developer to
construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the event certain milestones are not met
A Memorandum of Understanding with Ramsey County to allow Kensington
Development to construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the event certain
milestones are not met
This items requires a simple majority.
Background
At its April 7, 2021 meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an
amendment to the approved a Master Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review for a
proposed project at 3787 Lexington Avenue. This development includes the demolition of the
existing building to accommodate a 43,000 square foot grocery store. This item will come before
the City Council on April 26, 2021.
A key component to the success of this property is the scheduled improvements to Lexington
Avenue, specifically the traffic signal at the Target intersection. Ramsey County has scheduled
this project for construction in 2022. Although the County is confident the project will be
Page 2 of 2
completed as scheduled, the Developer is looking for assurance the traffic signal will be installed
and operational by the time the grocery store is scheduled to open (October, 2022). In order to do
this, the developer is requesting the City enter into a Development Agreement with them that
would allow the developer to install a temporary signal, at the developers’ cost, if the County
fails to award a contract for the construction of the project by February 1, 2022. The County does
not enter into development agreements with private developers, so they have requested the City
enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the County. The MOU allows the City
to authorize the developer to complete the improvements.
The development agreement and MOU are intended to provide some assurances to the developer
that certain improvements, especially a traffic signal will be installed. The developer will be
responsible for all costs associated with this work, including permits, design and construction.
We are bringing this item forward before the PUD/Site Plan Review because the developer needs
the agreements in place before May 3, 2021. If the City Council approves these agreements, we
will forward the MOU to the County for action.
Options and Motion Language
Staff has provided the following motion language for this case.
1. Recommend Approval: Motion to approve a Development Agreement with Kensington
Development to allow the developer to construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the
event certain milestones are not met and to approve a Memorandum of Understanding with
Ramsey County to allow Kensington Development to construct improvements on Lexington
Avenue in the event certain milestones are not met.
2. Recommend Denial: Motion to deny a Development Agreement with Kensington
Development to allow the developer to construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the
event certain milestones are not met and to approve a Memorandum of Understanding with
Ramsey County to allow Kensington Development to construct improvements on Lexington
Avenue in the event certain milestones are not met.
3. Table: Motion to table a Development Agreement with Kensington Development to allow the
developer to construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the event certain milestones
are not met and to approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Ramsey County to allow
Kensington Development to construct improvements on Lexington Avenue in the event
certain milestones are not met.
Budget Impact
NA
Attachments
A. Location Map
B. Development Agreement
C. Memorandum of Understanding
Disclaimer: This map is intended for reference purposes only and is
not a legally recorded map or survey. The City of Arden Hills shall
not be liable for any damages or claims that arise due to accuracy,
availability, use or misuse of the information herein pursuant to MN
Statute 466.03 Subd 21.
Location Map
Red Fox Road
Grey Fox RoadDunlap Street NorthLexington Avenue NorthNorthwoods Drive±
§¨¦35W
§¨¦694
£¤10
Shoreview
Subject Parcel Park and Open Space
00115750.DOC / v. 1
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is made between IMKD3 LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and Arden Hills 1031 LLC, an Illinois limited lability company (collectively
“KDP”) and the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota (“City”) and is entered into as of ____________,
2021.
WITNESS
WHEREAS, Kensington Development Partners, Inc., an Illinois corporation
(“Kensington”), is under contract (the “Contract”) to buy the real estate commonly known as 3787
Lexington Avenue, Arden Hills, MN (the “KDP Parcel”); and
WHEREAS, KDP has succeeded to Kensington’s interest in the Contract and the KDP
Parcel by accepting an assignment of the Contract from Kensington; and
WHEREAS, the County of Ramsey, Minnesota (“County”) is performing certain roadway
improvements to Lexington Avenue (the “Project”), which improvements include construction of a
full access (right in/right out/left in/left out) traffic signal and intersection/curb cut/entry apron
adjacent to and leading into the KDP Parcel in the locations shown on the site plan attached hereto
as Exhibit A (the “Site Plan”); a deceleration lane (in the location shown on the Site Plan) that will
allow vehicles to turn right into the KDP Parcel; new curbs as shown on the Site Plan; and such other
work as may be necessary to cause that part of Lexington Avenue that is adjacent to the KDP Parcel
to conform to the Site Plan (which work is collectively called the “ROW Work”); and
WHEREAS, KDP intends to redevelop the KDP Parcel for grocery purposes and the
grocery tenant is requiring that the ROW Work be completed no later than October 31, 2022 (the
“Grocery Deadline”); and
WHEREAS, the County has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with other
counties and government entities to share the expenses of the Project (which includes the ROW
Work) which intergovernmental agreement provides that the ROW Work will be completed by the
Grocery Deadline; and
WHEREAS, should the County, and the other parties under the intergovernmental
agreement (i) fail to cause the Project (which includes the ROW Work) to be fully funded by January
1, 2022 and/or (ii) fail to award a contract for the ROW Work by February 1, 2022 (the matters in
[i] and [ii] aforesaid are hereinafter called the “Trigger Events”), then the ROW Work may not be
completed by the Grocery Deadline in which event, KDP will suffer severe economic repercussions
under its agreement with the grocery tenant; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Memorandum of Understanding dated
__________2021 (the “MOU”) between the County and the City, the County and City have agreed
that if the Trigger Events occur, then KDP will assume the obligation, at KDP’s cost, to perform the
KDP ROW Work (defined hereinafter) and complete same by the Grocery Deadline; and
00115750.DOC / v. 1 2
WHEREAS, the City and KDP have entered into this Agreement to authorized KDP to
perform the KDP ROW Work in the event the Trigger Events occur.
NOW THEREFORE, for ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration,
the parties agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. The recitals set forth above are restated by this reference.
2. KDP ROW Work. Should the Trigger Events occur, the City agrees that KDP, at
KDP’s cost, shall perform the KDP ROW Work and complete same by the Grocery Deadline. The
“KPD ROW Work” is that part of the ROW Work that includes the full access (right in/right out/left
in/left out) traffic signal and intersection/curb cut/entry apron adjacent to and leading into the KDP
Parcel which is located in Lexington Avenue and is labeled as the KDP ROW Work on the Site
Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the KDP ROW Work (a) is only that part of the ROW Work
that falls in Lexington Avenue and is labeled as the KPD ROW Work on the Site Plan, (b) does not
include the deceleration lane, and (c) includes the work necessary to install a temporary traffic signal.
So long as KDP has obtained a building permit for the work it will perform on the KDP Parcel, the
City acknowledges and agrees that KDP shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits to
perform the KDP ROW Work and the KDP ROW Work shall be substantially consistent with the
County. The KPD ROW Work shall be performed by KDP in accordance with the plans and
specifications generated by the County.
The City agrees that its receipt, pursuant to the notice provisions of Section 3 hereinafter, of
written notice from KDP that the Trigger Events occurred shall be sufficient evidence that the
Trigger Events have occurred and will allow KDP to perform the KDP ROW Work pursuant to
this Agreement.
3. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or
permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing (at the addresses set forth below)
by any of the following means: (i) personal service; (ii) electronic mail or an attachment to electronic
mail in Adobe Systems, Inc. Portable Document Format (PDF); or (iii) delivery by any reputable
overnight courier service. Any notice, demand or request sent pursuant to either (i) or (ii) hereof
shall be deemed received upon such personal service or upon dispatch by electronic means and if
sent pursuant to (iii) hereof shall be deemed received one (1) day following delivery to such courier
service.
To KDP:
Kensington Development Partners, Inc.
700 Commerce Drive, Suite 130
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Attn: Dan Rae
dan@kensingtondev.com
To City:
00115750.DOC / v. 1 3
Public Works Director and City Engineer
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
dswearingen@cityofardenhills.org
4. Enforcement/Attorney Fees. Any party(ies) hereto shall have the right to enforce the
provisions of this Agreement against the other party(ies) by a proceeding at law or in equity. In any
such action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Agreement,
the unsuccessful party(ies) to such litigation, as determined by the court in a final judgment or decree,
shall pay the successful party(ies) all costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred therein
by such successful party(ies) (including, without limitation, such costs, expenses, and fees on any
appeals), and if such successful party(ies) shall recover judgment in any such action or proceeding,
such costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees shall be included as part of such judgment.
5. Warranties And Representations. KDP covenants, warrants and represents that: (a)
KDP will perform all of its obligations hereunder in prompt and workmanlike manner in accordance
with this Agreement; (b) the personnel assigned and consultants employed or used by KDP in the
performance of its obligations hereunder shall be of sufficient number and quality in all respects for
such assignment, employment and use; and (c) KDP possesses the necessary personnel, skills,
experience, and technical and financial resources to undertake the performance of the services and
obligations of KDP required herein.
6. Indemnity. KDP shall be liable to and hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify
and hold harmless City and any employees, officers or affiliates of the City from and against any and
all claims, loss, expense, liability, action or damage (including reasonable attorneys' fees and other
costs of defending any of the foregoing) arising or resulting from any fraud, willful misconduct, or
grossly negligent omission or performance by KDP, or any partner, officer, shareholder, employee
or other affiliate of KDP or any consultant to KDP rising from or in connection with the KDP ROW
Work.
7. Insurance. In the event KDP performs the KDP ROW Work, KDP shall carry,
workers' compensation and employers liability insurance in such amount of not less than $500,000
per occurrence. In addition, KDP shall require all design, architectural and engineering
professionals to maintain professional liability insurance with a limit of liability not less than
$1,000,000 insuring such professional and any officer, director, stockholder, employee, consultant
to or partner of such professional, and all other persons for whose acts such professional may be
liable, against any and all liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent acts, errors or
omissions of any the foregoing in connection with the carrying out of their professional
responsibilities with regard to the KDP ROW Work. Such policies shall provide that the insurance
company (“Company”) or an attorney approved by the Company shall defend any suit or proceeding
against KDP and/or the City in connection with the KDP ROW Work, even if such suit is
groundless, false or fraudulent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, KDP shall have the right to engage
its own attorneys for the purpose of defending any suit or proceeding against it or any officer, agent
or employee thereof
00115750.DOC / v. 1 4
All required insurance shall be maintained with responsible insurance carriers qualified to
do business in the State of Minnesota. Before commencing any performance hereunder, KDP shall
deposit with City the original policies of insurance, or certificates therefor. The workers’
compensation and employers liability and disability insurance described above hereof shall be kept
in force until final payment for the KDP ROW Work is made by KDP.
KDP shall also carry or cause to be carried comprehensive general liability insurance in
amounts to be determined by KDP against claims for personal injury or property damage arising out
of or in connection with the KDP ROW Work, and naming the City, if possible, as an additional
insured.
8. Severability. If this Agreement contains any unlawful provisions not an essential part
of the Agreement and which appear not to have been a controlling or material inducement to the
making thereof, the same shall be deemed to be of no effect, and shall upon the application of either
party be stricken from the Agreement without affecting the binding force of the Agreement as it shall
remain after omitting such provisions.
9. Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. Any signature page of this Agreement may be detached from any counterpart of this
Agreement without impairing the legal effect of any signatures thereon and may be attached to
another counterpart of this Agreement identical in form hereto but having attached to it one or more
additional signature pages. Executed copies hereof may be delivered by facsimile or as an attachment
to electronic mail in Adobe Systems, Inc. Portable Document Format (PDF) or other graphic file
type and upon receipt will be deemed originals and binding upon the parties hereto, regardless of
whether originals are delivered thereafter.
11. Authority. Each person whose signature is affixed hereto represents and warrants
that such person is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and to bind the entity on
whose behalf such person's signature is affixed.
[balance of page is blank]
00115750.DOC / v. 1 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and
year first hereinabove written.
KDP:
IMKD3 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By: ______________________________
Chad Jones, authorized signatory
ARDEN HILLS 1031 LLC, an Illinois limited lability company
By:________________________________
Jay Eck, manager
CITY:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
By:
Name:_________________________
Title:
00115750.DOC / v. 1 6
Exhibit A
Site Plan
00115223.DOC / v. 4
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (“Memorandum”) is made between the County of
Ramsey, Minnesota (“County”) and the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota (“City”) and is entered into
as of ____________, 2021.
WITNESS
WHEREAS, Kensington Development Partners, Inc., an Illinois corporation
(“Kensington”), is under contract (the “Contract”) to buy the real estate commonly known as 3787
Lexington Avenue, Arden Hills, MN (the “KDP Parcel”); and
WHEREAS, IMKD3 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as to an undivided fifty
(50%) percent interest as tenant in common and Arden Hills 1031 LLC, an Illinois limited lability
company, as to an undivided fifty (50%) percent interest as tenant in common (collectively “KDP”)
have succeeded to Kensington’s interest in the Contract and KDP Parcel by accepting an
assignment of the Contract from Kensington; and
WHEREAS, the County is performing certain roadway improvements to Lexington
Avenue (the “Project”), which improvements include construction a full access (right in/right
out/left in/left out) traffic signal and intersection/curb cut/entry apron adjacent to and leading into
the KDP Parcel in the locations shown on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Site
Plan”); a deceleration lane (in the location shown on the Site Plan) that will allow vehicles to turn
right into the KDP Parcel; new curbs as shown on the Site Plan; and such other work as may be
necessary to cause that part of Lexington Avenue that is adjacent to the KDP Parcel to conform to
the Site Plan (which work is collectively called the “ROW Work”); and
WHEREAS, KDP intends to redevelop the KDP Parcel for grocery purposes and the
grocery tenant is requiring that the ROW Work be completed no later than October 31, 2022
(the “Grocery Deadline”); and
WHEREAS, the County has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with other
counties and government entities to share the expenses of the Project (which includes the ROW
Work) which intergovernmental agreement provides that the ROW Work will be completed by
the Grocery Deadline; and
WHEREAS, should the County, and the other parties under the intergovernmental
agreement (i) fail to cause the Project (which includes the ROW Work) to be fully funded by
January 1, 2022 and/or (ii) fail to award a contract for the ROW Work by February 1, 2022 (the
matters in [i] and [ii] aforesaid are hereinafter called the “Trigger Events”), then the ROW Work
may not be completed by the Grocery Deadline in which event, KDP will suffer severe economic
repercussions under its agreement with the grocery tenant; and
WHEREAS, the County and City have agreed that if the Trigger Events occur, then KDP
will assume the obligation, at KDP’s cost, to perform the KDP ROW Work (defined hereinafter)
and complete same by the Grocery Deadline; and
00115223.DOC / v. 4 2
WHEREAS, the City and KDP have/will enter into a separate agreement (the
“Development Agreement”) that will provide that KDP will perform the KDP ROW Work in the
event the Trigger Events occur.
NOW THEREFORE, for ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration,
the parties agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. The recitals set forth above are restated by this reference.
2. KDP ROW Work. Should the Trigger Events occur, the County and City agree
that KDP, at KDP’s cost, shall perform the KDP ROW Work and complete same by the Grocery
Deadline. The “KPD ROW Work” is that part of the ROW Work that includes the full access
(right in/right out/left in/left out) traffic signal and intersection/curb cut/entry apron adjacent to and
leading into the KDP Parcel which is located in Lexington Avenue and is labeled as the KDP
ROW Work on the Site Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the KDP ROW Work (a) is only that
part of the ROW Work that falls in Lexington Avenue and is labeled as the KPD ROW Work on
the Site Plan, (b) does not include the deceleration lane, and (c) includes the work necessary to
install a temporary traffic signal. So long as KDP has obtained a building permit for the work it
will perform on the KDP Parcel, the County and City acknowledge and agree that KDP shall be
responsible for obtaining all necessary permits to perform the KDP ROW Work and the KDP
ROW Work shall be substantially consistent with the County plans. The KPD ROW Work shall
be performed by KDP in accordance with the plans and specifications generated by the County.
County shall also review and approve the temporary installation of the improvements.
The County and City agree that its receipt, pursuant to the notice provisions of Section 3
hereinafter, of written notice from KDP that the Trigger Events occurred shall be sufficient
evidence that the Trigger Events have occurred and will allow KDP to perform the KDP ROW
Work pursuant to the Development Agreement.
3. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or
permitted to be given under this Memorandum shall be given in writing (at the addresses set forth
below) by any of the following means: (i) personal service; (ii) electronic mail or an attachment to
electronic mail in Adobe Systems, Inc. Portable Document Format (PDF); or (iii) delivery by any
reputable overnight courier service. Any notice, demand or request sent pursuant to either (i) or
(ii) hereof shall be deemed received upon such personal service or upon dispatch by electronic
means and if sent pursuant to (iii) hereof shall be deemed received one (1) day following delivery
to such courier service.
To County:
Director of Public Works and County Engineer
Ransey County-Department of Public Works
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Att: John R. Mazzitello, Deputy Director-Program Delivery
john.mazzitello@co.ramsey.mn.us
00115223.DOC / v. 4 3
To City:
Public Works Director and City Engineer
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
dswearingen@cityofardenhills.org
4. Enforcement/Attorney Fees. Any party(ies) hereto shall have the right to enforce
the provisions of this Memorandum against the other party(ies) by a proceeding at law or in equity.
In any such action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this
Memorandum, the unsuccessful party(ies) to such litigation, as determined by the court in a final
judgment or decree, shall pay the successful party(ies) all costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys'
fees incurred therein by such successful party(ies) (including, without limitation, such costs,
expenses, and fees on any appeals), and if such successful party(ies) shall recover judgment in any
such action or proceeding, such costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees shall be included as part of
such judgment.
5. Counterparts. This Memorandum may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. Any signature page of this Memorandum may be detached from any counterpart
of this Memorandum without impairing the legal effect of any signatures thereon and may be
attached to another counterpart of this Memorandum identical in form hereto but having attached
to it one or more additional signature pages. Executed copies hereof may be delivered by facsimile
or as an attachment to electronic mail in Adobe Systems, Inc. Portable Document Format (PDF)
or other graphic file type and upon receipt will be deemed originals and binding upon the parties
hereto, regardless of whether originals are delivered thereafter.
6. Authority. Each person whose signature is affixed hereto represents and warrants
that such person is authorized to execute this Memorandum on behalf of and to bind the entity on
whose behalf such person's signature is affixed.
[balance of page is blank]
00115223.DOC / v. 4 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum the day
and year first hereinabove written.
COUNTY:
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA
By:
Name:_________________________
Title:
CITY:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
By:
Name:_________________________
Title:
00115223.DOC / v. 4 5
Exhibit A
Site Plan
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project – Special Assessment Hearing
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Hold a Special Assessment Hearing for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement
Project for public comment.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Background/Discussion
On January 25, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-004 Approving the Plans and
Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids. Bids were solicited during February and
opened on Wednesday, February 24, 2021.
A portion of the costs for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project are proposed to
be assessed against the benefitting properties according to the City’s Assessment Policy. In order
to assess these costs, the City must follow the process outlined in State Statute 429. On March 8,
2021, after the bids were opened, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-013 Declaring Costs
to be Assessed and set today as the date for the assessment hearing. A public hearing prior to
adopting the assessments is a requirement of State Statute 429. The proposed assessment area is
shown on Attachment A.
The project is proposed to be assessed consistent with the City’s Assessment Policy and past
practices, which states that 50% of the costs for roadway improvements will be assessed in
residential areas, with the remaining portion financed by City funds. Financing for the project is
consistent with City policy and past practice and is summarized in the table below. The project
costs include 27% engineering and overhead costs.
PUBLIC HEARING – 8A
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
The calculation of the amount to be assessed as approved by Council Resolution 2021-013 is
shown below. Also, the Council established that the interest rate would be 3.15% and the term
would be 10 years.
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Item Calculation Result
Half of Construction Cost $874,637.97/2 $437,318.98
Add 27% Overhead $437,318.98 x 1.27 $555,395.11
Divide by Assessable Units $555,395.11/80 $ 6,942.44
STREET RECLAMATION
Item Calculation Result
Half of Construction Cost $231,278.11/2 $115,639.06
Add 27% Overhead $115,639.06 x 1.27 $146,861.60
Divide by Assessable Units $146,861.60/58 $ 2,532.10
The full detailed assessment roll is attached as Exhibit B.
To date, no formal objections have been submitted in writing to City staff. Any written objection
received prior to Monday evening will be provided to the City Council at the assessment hearing.
As provided for in State Statute, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment
adopted unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City at
or prior to the assessment hearing. After the adoption of the assessment roll, property owners who
have submitted an objection in writing have 30 days to serve notice of an appeal to the City, and
within 10 days after serving notice to file with the District Court.
Recommendation
The Council should hold the Assessment Hearing first. After the Assessment Hearing is closed
and as part of New Business, Council should consider adopting Resolution 2021-020 Adopting the
Assessment Roll for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project with any changes they
deem appropriate.
Following the assessment hearing, also under new business, staff will be recommending award of
the contract to C&L Excavating as the lowest responsible bidder.
Attachments
Attachment A: Assessment Area Map
Attachment B: Assessment Roll
Attachment C: PowerPoint
COUNTY ROAD D W
SANDEEN RD
PRIOR AVE NKAT I E L N
N
E
W
B
R
I
GH
T
ON
R
D
CLEVELAND AVE NJERROLD AVE
EDGEWATER AVE
GLEN PAUL AVE LAKE JOHANNA BLVD18541916190418601928190019101866
3131
18701882188618901896 18501932
1961
1950
19541960
1955
18751921
1947 1865
1954
2002
1883 1877 1871
1998
1945
1889
1947
19481960
18831927 1871 1867
1903 1889
1897
1847
1960
1955
1961
1861
19111955
1936
2030 2020
1945
2014
1961
2008
18951917
3129
1933 1927 1921
3182
1985
19051915
2026
1954
1991
1966
19672033
1967
3246
1907 185319112027
2021 2015
2021 2015 2009 2001
2006
1975
2000
2013
1967
1999
188719131895
1905
1900
1880 18741884193418961926
19011913
1896
1933
19081912
1926
19001920
1890
1925
1866
1929
3130
2009
1966
197519851993
0
2027
2005
1966 1912
1901
1906
1905
19201934
19191933
3278
3192
3252
3264
3170
3173
3167
3176
3163
3151
3180
3185
3232
3243
3244
3240
3223
3211
3246
3192
1850
3264
3248
3263
32533243
19211925
3153
3199
3191
3235
3256
3301
1976
1992 1986 1980 1970
1981 1979 1975
1971
19761984
1992201420222028
2032
1977
1985
19891991
1995
1999
2017
2016 2008
2000
1990
1984 1976
1975198319912021
2027
1863
1895
1883
3273
3274
3200
3262
32523250
3200
3268
3258
0
Assessment Map - Hazelnut Neighborhood 0 500Feet
Ü
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
333023340101 1933 COUNTY ROAD D W Michael Todd Gunderson 1933 County Road D W Arden Hills, MN 55112 TBD $0 - Assess. Policy
333023330077 1947 COUNTY ROAD D W Mark Seemann Kerri Seemann 1947 County Road D W Arden Hills, MN 55112 TBD $0 - Assess. Policy
333023340055 1866 EDGEWATER AVE Mitchell W Winiecki Andrea J Winiecki 1866 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340054 1874 EDGEWATER AVE Michael F Thury Linda M Thury 1874 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340053 1880 EDGEWATER AVE Isabel H Waryan 1880 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340036 1883 EDGEWATER AVE Wade Thomas Britnie Thomas 1883 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340052 1884 EDGEWATER AVE Teresa Ng Kelvin Chau 1884 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340037 1887 EDGEWATER AVE Harvey C Hansen Nancy J Hansen 1887 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340038 1895 EDGEWATER AVE Maureen R Nielsen 1895 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340051 1896 EDGEWATER AVE Christy K Otake 1896 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340050 1900 EDGEWATER AVE Rui Yu Baiyi Yu 1900 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340039 1901 EDGEWATER AVE Heidi Grayden 1901 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340040 1905 EDGEWATER AVE Brandon Rhoda Melissa Rhoda 4409 Arden View Ct Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340049 1908 EDGEWATER AVE Mary Theresa Hill 1908 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340048 1912 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher Schertner Sara Kidd 1912 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340041 1913 EDGEWATER AVE Sheri Peterson, Brady Peterson Bruce T Pearson, Delores Pearson 1913 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340042 1919 EDGEWATER AVE Paul A Motley Grace A Motley 1919 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340047 1920 EDGEWATER AVE Lucus John Reidenbach Cora Reidenbach 1920 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340043 1925 EDGEWATER AVE Jordan Soderlind Lindsey Soderlind 1925 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340046 1926 EDGEWATER AVE Jessie M Belde 1926 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340044 1933 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher B Edgar Sara K Eliason 1933 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340045 1934 EDGEWATER AVE Kari J Hosmer 1934 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330019 1945 EDGEWATER AVE Scot A Hultberg Michelle M Hultberg 1945 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330045 1948 EDGEWATER AVE Mitchell H Bendix Linda H Barber 1948 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330044 1954 EDGEWATER AVE Karen Williams 1954 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330020 1955 EDGEWATER AVE Timothy Tierney 1955 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330043 1960 EDGEWATER AVE Jason Schumann Leandra Warumzer 1960 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330021 1961 EDGEWATER AVE Hermansun LLC 4335 France Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55410 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330042 1966 EDGEWATER AVE Rebecca Beek Tabor 1966 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330022 1967 EDGEWATER AVE Daniel R Crane Teresa A Crane 1967 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330023 1975 EDGEWATER AVE Douglas J Evink Trustee Valma L Evink Trustee 1975 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330041 1976 EDGEWATER AVE David L McKinnon 1976 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330024 1983 EDGEWATER AVE Aaron Spindler Maria R Spindler 1983 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330040 1984 EDGEWATER AVE William P Jensen Susan B Jensen 1984 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330025 1991 EDGEWATER AVE Kirk D Hall Urbae Y Hall 1991 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330039 1992 EDGEWATER AVE James A Gruetzman Jacqualin R Gruetzman 1992 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330026 1999 EDGEWATER AVE Duane B Wiste Holly L Wiste 1999 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330038 2000 EDGEWATER AVE Jessica M Alm 2000 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330027 2005 EDGEWATER AVE Mark A Hoelscher 2005 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330037 2006 EDGEWATER AVE Noelle J Destrampe Mark R Destrampe 2006 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330028 2013 EDGEWATER AVE Donald K Wyland Trustee Carol J Noren Trustee 2013 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330036 2014 EDGEWATER AVE Carole J Young Victor G Young Jr 2014 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330029 2021 EDGEWATER AVE Richard C Fish Jeanne M Fish 2021 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330035 2022 EDGEWATER AVE David Motanya 2022 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330030 2027 EDGEWATER AVE Mark P Oneill Britney R Oneill 2027 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330034 2028 EDGEWATER AVE Robert J Morrissette Georganne Morrissette 2028 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330033 2032 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher Alex Kathleen Alex 2032 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340071 1916 GLEN PAUL AVE Roy A Ambli Joan A Ambli 1916 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340073 1904 GLEN PAUL AVE Melissa M Atwood Reichert Mark A Reichert 1904 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340081 1860 GLEN PAUL AVE Patricia L Beaudry 1960 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340074 1900 GLEN PAUL AVE Lynnette R Gutzman Donahue 1900 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Page 1 of 3
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
333023340080 1866 GLEN PAUL AVE Jenni C Schoppers 1866 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340066 1921 GLEN PAUL AVE Todd C Rose 924 James Ave St Paul, MN 55102 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340067 1927 GLEN PAUL AVE James T Wolters Julie R Wolters 1927 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340056 1863 GLEN PAUL AVE Jarrett Holbrook Barbara C Holbrook 1863 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330047 1955 GLEN PAUL AVE John Gray Rock Teresa Gonske 1955 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330049 1967 GLEN PAUL AVE James W Sommerfeld Mary R Sommerfeld 1970 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330062 2026 GLEN PAUL AVE Kimberly L Held Bradley S Held 2026 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330057 2015 GLEN PAUL AVE Edward A Gruening Amie L Andert 2015 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330059 2027 GLEN PAUL AVE Daniel C Mcdougall Susan J Mcdougall 2027 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330069 1986 GLEN PAUL AVE Ernest C Hunt Melinda B Hunt 1986 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330066 2002 GLEN PAUL AVE Monica R Groves 2002 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330063 2020 GLEN PAUL AVE Melanie S Henderson 2020 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330070 1980 GLEN PAUL AVE Michael B Moriarty Dorothy K Moriarty 1980 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340082 1854 GLEN PAUL AVE Brianna Erickson Travis Erickson 1854 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340072 1910 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert E Peters Alice M Peters Le 1303 8th Ln Anoka, MN 55303 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340078 1882 GLEN PAUL AVE Steven A Henkel Victoria K Henkel 1882 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340077 1886 GLEN PAUL AVE Gary Habiger Christine Habiger 1886 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340076 1890 GLEN PAUL AVE Eli Eschenbauch Catherine M Eschenbauch 1890 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340075 1896 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert H Carley Martha R Hanson Carley 1896 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340083 1850 GLEN PAUL AVE Bret D Latimer Naomi J Latimer 1850 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340064 1911 GLEN PAUL AVE Paul W Ruppel 1911 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340068 1933 GLEN PAUL AVE Brian J Schmidt 1933 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330048 1961 GLEN PAUL AVE Neal R Sautbine Linda A Farnham 1961 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330076 1936 GLEN PAUL AVE Michael P Gaulke Rachel Lynn Gaulke 1936 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330073 1966 GLEN PAUL AVE Sharon Oen 1966 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330067 1998 GLEN PAUL AVE Lois A Johnson Tr 1998 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330065 2008 GLEN PAUL AVE Donald L Mangen Michelle M Mangen 2008 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330051 1975 GLEN PAUL AVE Jeanne V Anderson 1975 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330050 1971 GLEN PAUL AVE Brendan D Leahy Caroline G Leahy 1971 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330052 1979 GLEN PAUL AVE Leonard J Theisen Jill T Theisen 1979 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340069 1932 GLEN PAUL AVE Steven Smilanich 1932 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340059 1875 GLEN PAUL AVE Sakarun Korkiattikan Amber M Wunderlich 1875 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 56324 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340063 1905 GLEN PAUL AVE Jason Peters Amy M Peters 1905 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340065 1915 GLEN PAUL AVE Bartolome Cortes Gutierrez Carie Cortes Osby 1915 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330074 1960 GLEN PAUL AVE Alexander M Kolmer Cara R Kolmer 1960 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330075 1954 GLEN PAUL AVE Rachel M Brisson Nicholas E Brisson 1954 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330056 2009 GLEN PAUL AVE Wingspan Life Resources 30 Plato Bvd W St Paul, MN 55107 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330055 1991 GLEN PAUL AVE Rahul C Shah 1991 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340070 1928 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert F Karnitz 1928 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340079 1870 GLEN PAUL AVE Matthew L Sterling Kristin Sterling 1870 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55435 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340061 1889 GLEN PAUL AVE Mark S Bergman Yen T Bergman 1889 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340060 1883 GLEN PAUL AVE Aaron D Willford Jennifer K Willford 1883 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340058 1871 GLEN PAUL AVE David B Wunderlich Juanita L Wunderlich 1871 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340057 1867 GLEN PAUL AVE Thomas W Whittles Cherly B Whittles 1867 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340062 1897 GLEN PAUL AVE Jenelle L C Hastings 1897 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330046 1945 GLEN PAUL AVE Vincent C Linders Trustee Carol J Linders Trustee 1945 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330054 1985 GLEN PAUL AVE Jodi Reed Viken Reanne Reed Viken 1985 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330058 2021 GLEN PAUL AVE Christopher J Sanders 2021 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330068 1992 GLEN PAUL AVE Scott E Hawkins Kate J Hawkins 1992 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330072 1970 GLEN PAUL AVE James W Sommerfeld Mary R Sommerfeld 1970 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330061 2030 GLEN PAUL AVE Mark Mcguire Ruth Mcguire 2030 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330064 2014 GLEN PAUL AVE Monte R Arhart 2014 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
Page 2 of 3
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
333023330071 1976 GLEN PAUL AVE Christopher L Dadisman Sarah A Dadisman 1976 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330053 1981 GLEN PAUL AVE Patrick Jorgenson Emma Czeck 1981 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340035 1890 JERROLD AVE Jon A Cloutier Karen J Cloutier 1890 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340021 1895 JERROLD AVE Elizabeth C Valtinson Justen J Valtinson 1895 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340034 1896 JERROLD AVE David G Anderson Virginia M Andersion 1896 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340033 1900 JERROLD AVE Kenneth R Tate Paula G Tate 1900 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340022 1901 JERROLD AVE James E Timp Tracy Timp 1901 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340023 1905 JERROLD AVE Donald E Dornfeld JR 1905 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340032 1906 JERROLD AVE Joseph S Hayden Darlene A Hayden 1906 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340031 1912 JERROLD AVE Aaron J Starr Emma K Starr 1912 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340024 1913 JERROLD AVE Raymond M LeClair Nancy A LeClair 1913 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340030 1920 JERROLD AVE Michael W Hagedorn Jane Hagedorn 1920 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340025 1921 JERROLD AVE Daniel M Altstatt Dawn M Altstatt 1921 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340026 1925 JERROLD AVE Margaret A McCauley 1925 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340029 1926 JERROLD AVE Bryan H Johnson Janet L Johnson 1926 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340027 1929 JERROLD AVE Keith A Bateman Laura B Bateman 1929 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340028 1934 JERROLD AVE Geraldine P Huber 1934 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330001 1947 JERROLD AVE David V Hencir Stephanie A Hencir 1947 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330018 1950 JERROLD AVE Debra S Lane 1950 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330017 1954 JERROLD AVE Kathleen M Obrien 1954 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330016 1960 JERROLD AVE Robert M Stupar Jeanne M Stupar 1960 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330002 1961 JERROLD AVE Steven C Olson Trustee Kristi A Olson Trustee 1961 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330015 1966 JERROLD AVE Kevin S Enberg Tina M Enberg 1966 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330003 1975 JERROLD AVE David Speed Lynne Speed 1975 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330014 1976 JERROLD AVE James D Marshik Mary A Marshik 1976 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330004 1977 JERROLD AVE Scott Prihoda Sarah Prihoda 1977 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330013 1984 JERROLD AVE Matthew Hamilton Mandy Hamilton 1984 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330005 1985 JERROLD AVE Rebekah Wacek Benjamin Wacek 1985 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023320017 1989 JERROLD AVE Kelby Wane Souhrada Sarah Souhrada 1989 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330012 1990 JERROLD AVE Christopher C Rogers Trustee Debra K Cariveau-Rogers Trustee 1990 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023320016 1991 JERROLD AVE Wallace B Olson Jr Nancy S Olson 1991 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330006 1995 JERROLD AVE Robert Williams II Claire Williams 1995 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330007 1999 JERROLD AVE Delon L Jentz Rachel P Jentz 1999 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330011 2000 JERROLD AVE Wayne C Nelson Teresa F Nelson 2000 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330010 2008 JERROLD AVE Peter Song-Ho Hill TR Christina E Hill TR 2008 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330009 2016 JERROLD AVE Linda E Literski TR 2016 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330008 2017 JERROLD AVE David F Johnson Trustee Katherine M Johnson Trustee 2017 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
Page 3 of 3
Public Assessment Hearing &
Contract Award
2021 PMP Street & Utility Improvements
__________________________
Council Meeting
April 12, 2021
1
Total Project Costs
2
Project Improvements Project Costs
Reconstruction Street Improvements
(Glenpaul and east Jerrold)
$1,110,790
Reclamation Street Improvements
(Edgewater and west Jerrold)
$293,723
Prior Ave Street Improvements (Not Assessed)$398,106
Trail Improvements (Not Assessed)$45,445
Watermain Improvements $610,880
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $416,219
Storm Sewer Drainage Improvements $554,249
Total $3,429,412
Low Bid from C&L Excavating, Inc.: $2,704,412.10 (Construction Costs)
Construction Costs plus $725,000 in Expenses (Approximately 27% of Construction Costs)
CIP Budget: $3,807,000
Project Funding
3
Funding Source Amount
PIR Fund $1,145,807
Special Assessments $702,257
Water Utility $610,880
Sanitary Sewer Utility $416,219
Surface Water Utility $554,249
Total $3,429,412
4
Assessment Rates
5
Project Area Proposed Final Rate Feasibility Rate
Street Reconstruction
(Glenpaul and east Jerrold)
$6,942.44 $8,107.00
Full Depth Reclamation
(Edgewater and west Jerrold)
$2,532.10 $2,984.00
50% of the Street Project Costs
•Reconstruction: Glenpaul and east Jerrold = $555,395.11 (80 Units)
•Reclamation: Edgewater and west Jerrold = $146,861.60 (58 Units)
Street costs on Prior Avenue were not included in the assessment calculations.
Assessment Payment
6
Option 1 –Prior to November 15, 2021
•A property owner may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor on
November 15, 2021, pay the entire assessment on such property to the City of Arden Hills, with interest
accrued to the date of payment.
•No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment (30 days from tonight, April 12, 2021).
Option 2 –After November 15, 2021
•The assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable with property taxes in 2022.
•Balance will bear interest at a rate of 3.15% percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution (tonight, April 12, 2021).
•After November 15, 2021, a property owner may pay the total outstanding balance of the assessment
against their property with accrued interest at any time during the life of the project assessment
period to Ramsey County.
Next Steps
Public Engagement #3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 16, 2021
Begin Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . June 2021
Substantial Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 2021
Certify Assessments to County . . . . . . . . .. November 2021
7
QUESTIONS
8
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project – Adopt Assessment Roll
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Approving Resolution 2021-020 Adopting Assessment Roll for the 2021 PMP Street
and Utility Improvement Project.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Background/Discussion
On January 25, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-037 Approving the Plans and
Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids. Bids were solicited during February and
opened on Wednesday, February 24, 2021. The assessment hearing was held on April 12, 2021.
A portion of the costs for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project are proposed to
be assessed against the benefitting properties according to the City’s Assessment Policy. In order
to assess these costs, the City must follow the process outlined in State Statute 429. On March 8,
2021, after the bids were opened, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-013 Declaring Costs
to be Assessed and set today as the date for the assessment hearing. A public hearing prior to
adopting the assessments is a requirement of State Statute 429. The proposed assessment area is
shown on Attachment A.
The project is proposed to be assessed consistent with the City’s Assessment Policy and past
practices, which states that 50% of the costs for roadway improvements will be assessed in
residential areas, with the remaining portion financed by City funds. Financing for the project is
consistent with City policy and past practice and is summarized in the table below. The project
costs include 27% engineering and overhead costs.
NEW BUSINESS – 9A
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
The calculation of the amount to be assessed as approved by Council Resolution 2021-013 is
shown below. Also, the Council established that the interest rate would be 3.15% and the term
would be 10 years.
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Item Calculation Result
Half of Construction Cost $874,637.97/2 $437,318.98
Add 27% Overhead $437,318.98 x 1.27 $555,395.11
Divide by Assessable Units $555,395.11/80 $ 6,942.44
STREET RECLAMATION
Item Calculation Result
Half of Construction Cost $231,278.11/2 $115,639.06
Add 27% Overhead $115,639.06 x 1.27 $146,861.60
Divide by Assessable Units $146,861.60/58 $ 2,532.10
The full detailed assessment roll is attached as Exhibit B.
Attachments
Attachment A: Assessment Area Map
Attachment B: Assessment Roll
Attachment C: Resolution 2021-020
COUNTY ROAD D W
SANDEEN RD
PRIOR AVE NKAT I E L N
N
E
W
B
R
I
GH
T
ON
R
D
CLEVELAND AVE NJERROLD AVE
EDGEWATER AVE
GLEN PAUL AVE LAKE JOHANNA BLVD18541916190418601928190019101866
3131
18701882188618901896 18501932
1961
1950
19541960
1955
18751921
1947 1865
1954
2002
1883 1877 1871
1998
1945
1889
1947
19481960
18831927 1871 1867
1903 1889
1897
1847
1960
1955
1961
1861
19111955
1936
2030 2020
1945
2014
1961
2008
18951917
3129
1933 1927 1921
3182
1985
19051915
2026
1954
1991
1966
19672033
1967
3246
1907 185319112027
2021 2015
2021 2015 2009 2001
2006
1975
2000
2013
1967
1999
188719131895
1905
1900
1880 18741884193418961926
19011913
1896
1933
19081912
1926
19001920
1890
1925
1866
1929
3130
2009
1966
197519851993
0
2027
2005
1966 1912
1901
1906
1905
19201934
19191933
3278
3192
3252
3264
3170
3173
3167
3176
3163
3151
3180
3185
3232
3243
3244
3240
3223
3211
3246
3192
1850
3264
3248
3263
32533243
19211925
3153
3199
3191
3235
3256
3301
1976
1992 1986 1980 1970
1981 1979 1975
1971
19761984
1992201420222028
2032
1977
1985
19891991
1995
1999
2017
2016 2008
2000
1990
1984 1976
1975198319912021
2027
1863
1895
1883
3273
3274
3200
3262
32523250
3200
3268
3258
0
Assessment Map - Hazelnut Neighborhood 0 500Feet
Ü
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
333023340101 1933 COUNTY ROAD D W Michael Todd Gunderson 1933 County Road D W Arden Hills, MN 55112 TBD $0 - Assess. Policy
333023330077 1947 COUNTY ROAD D W Mark Seemann Kerri Seemann 1947 County Road D W Arden Hills, MN 55112 TBD $0 - Assess. Policy
333023340055 1866 EDGEWATER AVE Mitchell W Winiecki Andrea J Winiecki 1866 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340054 1874 EDGEWATER AVE Michael F Thury Linda M Thury 1874 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340053 1880 EDGEWATER AVE Isabel H Waryan 1880 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340036 1883 EDGEWATER AVE Wade Thomas Britnie Thomas 1883 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340052 1884 EDGEWATER AVE Teresa Ng Kelvin Chau 1884 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340037 1887 EDGEWATER AVE Harvey C Hansen Nancy J Hansen 1887 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340038 1895 EDGEWATER AVE Maureen R Nielsen 1895 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340051 1896 EDGEWATER AVE Christy K Otake 1896 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340050 1900 EDGEWATER AVE Rui Yu Baiyi Yu 1900 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340039 1901 EDGEWATER AVE Heidi Grayden 1901 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340040 1905 EDGEWATER AVE Brandon Rhoda Melissa Rhoda 4409 Arden View Ct Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340049 1908 EDGEWATER AVE Mary Theresa Hill 1908 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340048 1912 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher Schertner Sara Kidd 1912 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340041 1913 EDGEWATER AVE Sheri Peterson, Brady Peterson Bruce T Pearson, Delores Pearson 1913 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340042 1919 EDGEWATER AVE Paul A Motley Grace A Motley 1919 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340047 1920 EDGEWATER AVE Lucus John Reidenbach Cora Reidenbach 1920 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340043 1925 EDGEWATER AVE Jordan Soderlind Lindsey Soderlind 1925 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340046 1926 EDGEWATER AVE Jessie M Belde 1926 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340044 1933 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher B Edgar Sara K Eliason 1933 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340045 1934 EDGEWATER AVE Kari J Hosmer 1934 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330019 1945 EDGEWATER AVE Scot A Hultberg Michelle M Hultberg 1945 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330045 1948 EDGEWATER AVE Mitchell H Bendix Linda H Barber 1948 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330044 1954 EDGEWATER AVE Karen Williams 1954 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330020 1955 EDGEWATER AVE Timothy Tierney 1955 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330043 1960 EDGEWATER AVE Jason Schumann Leandra Warumzer 1960 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330021 1961 EDGEWATER AVE Hermansun LLC 4335 France Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55410 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330042 1966 EDGEWATER AVE Rebecca Beek Tabor 1966 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330022 1967 EDGEWATER AVE Daniel R Crane Teresa A Crane 1967 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330023 1975 EDGEWATER AVE Douglas J Evink Trustee Valma L Evink Trustee 1975 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330041 1976 EDGEWATER AVE David L McKinnon 1976 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330024 1983 EDGEWATER AVE Aaron Spindler Maria R Spindler 1983 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330040 1984 EDGEWATER AVE William P Jensen Susan B Jensen 1984 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330025 1991 EDGEWATER AVE Kirk D Hall Urbae Y Hall 1991 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330039 1992 EDGEWATER AVE James A Gruetzman Jacqualin R Gruetzman 1992 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330026 1999 EDGEWATER AVE Duane B Wiste Holly L Wiste 1999 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330038 2000 EDGEWATER AVE Jessica M Alm 2000 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330027 2005 EDGEWATER AVE Mark A Hoelscher 2005 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330037 2006 EDGEWATER AVE Noelle J Destrampe Mark R Destrampe 2006 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330028 2013 EDGEWATER AVE Donald K Wyland Trustee Carol J Noren Trustee 2013 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330036 2014 EDGEWATER AVE Carole J Young Victor G Young Jr 2014 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330029 2021 EDGEWATER AVE Richard C Fish Jeanne M Fish 2021 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330035 2022 EDGEWATER AVE David Motanya 2022 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330030 2027 EDGEWATER AVE Mark P Oneill Britney R Oneill 2027 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330034 2028 EDGEWATER AVE Robert J Morrissette Georganne Morrissette 2028 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330033 2032 EDGEWATER AVE Christopher Alex Kathleen Alex 2032 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023340071 1916 GLEN PAUL AVE Roy A Ambli Joan A Ambli 1916 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340073 1904 GLEN PAUL AVE Melissa M Atwood Reichert Mark A Reichert 1904 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340081 1860 GLEN PAUL AVE Patricia L Beaudry 1960 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340074 1900 GLEN PAUL AVE Lynnette R Gutzman Donahue 1900 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Page 1 of 3
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
333023340080 1866 GLEN PAUL AVE Jenni C Schoppers 1866 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340066 1921 GLEN PAUL AVE Todd C Rose 924 James Ave St Paul, MN 55102 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340067 1927 GLEN PAUL AVE James T Wolters Julie R Wolters 1927 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340056 1863 GLEN PAUL AVE Jarrett Holbrook Barbara C Holbrook 1863 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330047 1955 GLEN PAUL AVE John Gray Rock Teresa Gonske 1955 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330049 1967 GLEN PAUL AVE James W Sommerfeld Mary R Sommerfeld 1970 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330062 2026 GLEN PAUL AVE Kimberly L Held Bradley S Held 2026 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330057 2015 GLEN PAUL AVE Edward A Gruening Amie L Andert 2015 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330059 2027 GLEN PAUL AVE Daniel C Mcdougall Susan J Mcdougall 2027 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330069 1986 GLEN PAUL AVE Ernest C Hunt Melinda B Hunt 1986 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330066 2002 GLEN PAUL AVE Monica R Groves 2002 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330063 2020 GLEN PAUL AVE Melanie S Henderson 2020 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330070 1980 GLEN PAUL AVE Michael B Moriarty Dorothy K Moriarty 1980 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340082 1854 GLEN PAUL AVE Brianna Erickson Travis Erickson 1854 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340072 1910 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert E Peters Alice M Peters Le 1303 8th Ln Anoka, MN 55303 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340078 1882 GLEN PAUL AVE Steven A Henkel Victoria K Henkel 1882 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340077 1886 GLEN PAUL AVE Gary Habiger Christine Habiger 1886 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340076 1890 GLEN PAUL AVE Eli Eschenbauch Catherine M Eschenbauch 1890 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340075 1896 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert H Carley Martha R Hanson Carley 1896 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340083 1850 GLEN PAUL AVE Bret D Latimer Naomi J Latimer 1850 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340064 1911 GLEN PAUL AVE Paul W Ruppel 1911 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340068 1933 GLEN PAUL AVE Brian J Schmidt 1933 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330048 1961 GLEN PAUL AVE Neal R Sautbine Linda A Farnham 1961 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330076 1936 GLEN PAUL AVE Michael P Gaulke Rachel Lynn Gaulke 1936 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330073 1966 GLEN PAUL AVE Sharon Oen 1966 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330067 1998 GLEN PAUL AVE Lois A Johnson Tr 1998 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330065 2008 GLEN PAUL AVE Donald L Mangen Michelle M Mangen 2008 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330051 1975 GLEN PAUL AVE Jeanne V Anderson 1975 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330050 1971 GLEN PAUL AVE Brendan D Leahy Caroline G Leahy 1971 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330052 1979 GLEN PAUL AVE Leonard J Theisen Jill T Theisen 1979 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340069 1932 GLEN PAUL AVE Steven Smilanich 1932 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340059 1875 GLEN PAUL AVE Sakarun Korkiattikan Amber M Wunderlich 1875 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 56324 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340063 1905 GLEN PAUL AVE Jason Peters Amy M Peters 1905 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340065 1915 GLEN PAUL AVE Bartolome Cortes Gutierrez Carie Cortes Osby 1915 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330074 1960 GLEN PAUL AVE Alexander M Kolmer Cara R Kolmer 1960 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330075 1954 GLEN PAUL AVE Rachel M Brisson Nicholas E Brisson 1954 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330056 2009 GLEN PAUL AVE Wingspan Life Resources 30 Plato Bvd W St Paul, MN 55107 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330055 1991 GLEN PAUL AVE Rahul C Shah 1991 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340070 1928 GLEN PAUL AVE Robert F Karnitz 1928 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340079 1870 GLEN PAUL AVE Matthew L Sterling Kristin Sterling 1870 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55435 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340061 1889 GLEN PAUL AVE Mark S Bergman Yen T Bergman 1889 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340060 1883 GLEN PAUL AVE Aaron D Willford Jennifer K Willford 1883 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340058 1871 GLEN PAUL AVE David B Wunderlich Juanita L Wunderlich 1871 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340057 1867 GLEN PAUL AVE Thomas W Whittles Cherly B Whittles 1867 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340062 1897 GLEN PAUL AVE Jenelle L C Hastings 1897 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330046 1945 GLEN PAUL AVE Vincent C Linders Trustee Carol J Linders Trustee 1945 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330054 1985 GLEN PAUL AVE Jodi Reed Viken Reanne Reed Viken 1985 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330058 2021 GLEN PAUL AVE Christopher J Sanders 2021 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330068 1992 GLEN PAUL AVE Scott E Hawkins Kate J Hawkins 1992 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330072 1970 GLEN PAUL AVE James W Sommerfeld Mary R Sommerfeld 1970 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330061 2030 GLEN PAUL AVE Mark Mcguire Ruth Mcguire 2030 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330064 2014 GLEN PAUL AVE Monte R Arhart 2014 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
Page 2 of 3
City Project: 2021 Pavement Management Project - Street and Utility Improvements Cost Units REU Amount
Project No.:PW-21-0100 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Neighborhood:$146,861.60 58 $2,532.10
Date:April 12, 2021 Street Reconstruction Neighborhood $555,395.11 80 $6,942.44
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
Assessment Roll
PROPERTY ADDRESS
333023330071 1976 GLEN PAUL AVE Christopher L Dadisman Sarah A Dadisman 1976 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330053 1981 GLEN PAUL AVE Patrick Jorgenson Emma Czeck 1981 Glen Paul Ave Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340035 1890 JERROLD AVE Jon A Cloutier Karen J Cloutier 1890 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340021 1895 JERROLD AVE Elizabeth C Valtinson Justen J Valtinson 1895 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340034 1896 JERROLD AVE David G Anderson Virginia M Andersion 1896 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340033 1900 JERROLD AVE Kenneth R Tate Paula G Tate 1900 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340022 1901 JERROLD AVE James E Timp Tracy Timp 1901 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340023 1905 JERROLD AVE Donald E Dornfeld JR 1905 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340032 1906 JERROLD AVE Joseph S Hayden Darlene A Hayden 1906 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340031 1912 JERROLD AVE Aaron J Starr Emma K Starr 1912 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340024 1913 JERROLD AVE Raymond M LeClair Nancy A LeClair 1913 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340030 1920 JERROLD AVE Michael W Hagedorn Jane Hagedorn 1920 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340025 1921 JERROLD AVE Daniel M Altstatt Dawn M Altstatt 1921 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340026 1925 JERROLD AVE Margaret A McCauley 1925 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340029 1926 JERROLD AVE Bryan H Johnson Janet L Johnson 1926 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340027 1929 JERROLD AVE Keith A Bateman Laura B Bateman 1929 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023340028 1934 JERROLD AVE Geraldine P Huber 1934 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330001 1947 JERROLD AVE David V Hencir Stephanie A Hencir 1947 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330018 1950 JERROLD AVE Debra S Lane 1950 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330017 1954 JERROLD AVE Kathleen M Obrien 1954 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330016 1960 JERROLD AVE Robert M Stupar Jeanne M Stupar 1960 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330002 1961 JERROLD AVE Steven C Olson Trustee Kristi A Olson Trustee 1961 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330015 1966 JERROLD AVE Kevin S Enberg Tina M Enberg 1966 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330003 1975 JERROLD AVE David Speed Lynne Speed 1975 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-Reconstruct $6,942.44
333023330014 1976 JERROLD AVE James D Marshik Mary A Marshik 1976 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330004 1977 JERROLD AVE Scott Prihoda Sarah Prihoda 1977 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330013 1984 JERROLD AVE Matthew Hamilton Mandy Hamilton 1984 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330005 1985 JERROLD AVE Rebekah Wacek Benjamin Wacek 1985 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023320017 1989 JERROLD AVE Kelby Wane Souhrada Sarah Souhrada 1989 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330012 1990 JERROLD AVE Christopher C Rogers Trustee Debra K Cariveau-Rogers Trustee 1990 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023320016 1991 JERROLD AVE Wallace B Olson Jr Nancy S Olson 1991 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330006 1995 JERROLD AVE Robert Williams II Claire Williams 1995 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330007 1999 JERROLD AVE Delon L Jentz Rachel P Jentz 1999 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330011 2000 JERROLD AVE Wayne C Nelson Teresa F Nelson 2000 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330010 2008 JERROLD AVE Peter Song-Ho Hill TR Christina E Hill TR 2008 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330009 2016 JERROLD AVE Linda E Literski TR 2016 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
333023330008 2017 JERROLD AVE David F Johnson Trustee Katherine M Johnson Trustee 2017 Jerrold Avenue Arden Hills, MN 55112 1-FDR $2,532.10
Page 3 of 3
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-020
RESOLUTION ADOPTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR THE 2021 PMP STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met
and heard and passed upon all objections to the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project, the
improvement of Glenpaul Avenue, Edgewater Avenue, Jerrold Avenue, and Prior Avenue.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN
HILLS, MINNESOTA:
1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2.Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January 2022 and will bear interest at the rate of 3.15% percent per annum from the date
of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31,
2021. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with
interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. The
owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged
through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4.The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor
to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and
paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 12TH
DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
____________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Julie Hanson, City Clerk
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
David Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project – Contract Award
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$3,807,000
(2021 CIP)
$3,429,412
(Based on Low Bid) PIR, Assessments, Water, Sanitary
Sewer and Surface Water Utilities
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Approve Resolution 2021-021 Awarding the 2021 PMP Street and Utility
Improvements Contract to C&L Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $2,704,412.10.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Backround/Discussion
On January 25, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-004 Approving the Plans and
Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids. Bids were opened on Wednesday,
February 24, 2021.
There were a total of eleven bids received. The following table lists the bidders name and their total
bid:
Bidder Total Bid
C&L Excavating, Inc. $2,704,412.10
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $2,866,599.35
Kuechle Underground , Inc. $2,886,894.78
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $2,995,276.10
Meyer Contracting, Inc. $3,022,073.96
Veit & Company, Inc. $3,061,031.90
Park Construction Company $3,063,436.45
RL Larson Excavating, Inc. $3,152,660.63
Geislinger & Sons $3,153,190.75
Northdale Construction Company, Inc. $3,184,976.76
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $3,320,288.00
NEW BUSINESS – 9B
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
The low bid is lower than the Engineer’s Estimate which is $3,234,599.50. The bid tabulation
summary is included as Attachment A with a detailed bid abstract included as Attachment D.
C&L Excavating has completed similar projects successfully in the metro area. Attached is a letter
(Attachment B) from Bolton & Menk recommending award to C&L Excavating, Inc. as the lowest
responsible/responsive bidder. Attachment C is Resolution 2021-021 awarding the 2021 PMP Street
and Utility Improvements to C&L Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $2,704,412.10. Staff
recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-021.
Attachments
Attachment A: Bid Tabulation Summary
Attachment B: Bolton & Menk Letter
Assessment C: Resolution 2021-021
Attachment D: Detailed Bid Abstract
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
Mankato – Fairmont – Sleepy Eye – Burnsville – Willmar - Chaska – Ramsey – Maplewood – Baxter – Rochester –
Duluth, MN
Algona – Ames – Cedar Rapids – Des Moines – Jefferson – Spencer, IA & Fargo, ND
BID TABULATION
2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements
City of Arden Hills
Arden Hills, MN
PW-21-0100
Bid Taken: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 Addendums: #1 – 02/12/21
Time: 10:00 a.m. #2 – 02/19/21
No. BIDDERS TOTAL AMOUNT BID
1 C&L Excavating, Inc. $2,704,412.10
2 T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $2,866,599.35
3 Kuechle Underground $2,886,894.78
4 Northwest $2,995,276.10
5 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $3,022,073.96
6 Veit & Company, Inc. $3,061,031.90
7 Park Construction Company $3,063,436.45
8 Rl Larson Excavating, Inc. $3,152,660.63
9 Geislinger & Sons $3,153,190.75
10 Northdale Construction Company, Inc. $3,184,976.76
11 Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $3,320,288.00
H:\ARDH\T13122417\1_Corres\A_Meetings\2021-04-12_Assessment Hearing and Contract Award\Award Construction Contract\Attachment B_Award Recommendation Letter.docx
March 26, 2021
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: 2021 PMP Street & Utility Improvements
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
City Project No. PW-21-0100
BMI Project No.: T13.122417
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
Bids on the above-referenced project were opened on Wednesday, February 24 , 2021. There were eleven
bidders for the project; a tabulation of bids received, and a detailed bid abstract are enclosed. The low
bidder on the project is C&L Excavating, Inc. with a bid of $2,704,412.10. The Engineer’s Estimate for
the project was $3,234,599.50. C&L Excavating, Inc. has previous experience on projects of this size and
complexity in the greater metro area.
Based on C&L Excavating’s experience, acceptable bid prices, and the competitive bids the City
received, we recommend the City of Arden Hills award the project to C&L Excavating, Inc. following the
Special Assessment Hearing on April 12, 2021.
If you have any questions regarding th is award recommendation, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Nicholas J. Amatuccio, P.E.
Senior Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: David Swearingen, City of Arden Hills, Interim Public Works Director
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-021
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT
FOR THE 2021 PMP STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility
Improvement Project, the improvement of Glenpaul Avenue, Edgewater Avenue, Jerrold Avenue, and
Prior Avenue, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to the law, and the following bids
were received complying with the advertisement:
C&L Excavating, Inc. $2,704,412.10
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $2,866,599.35
Kuechle Underground , Inc. $2,886,894.78
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $2,995,276.10
Meyer Contracting, Inc. $3,022,073.96
Veit & Company, Inc. $3,061,031.90
Park Construction Company $3,063,436.45
RL Larson Excavating, Inc. $3,152,660.63
Geislinger & Sons $3,153,190.75
Northdale Construction Company, Inc. $3,184,976.76
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $3,320,288.00
and;
WHEREAS, C&L Excavating, Inc. of St. Joseph, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract
with C&L Excavating, Inc. of St. Joseph, Minnesota in the name of the City of Arden Hills for the
2021 Street and Utility Improvement Project according to the plans and specifications therefor
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits
made with their bids, except the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder
shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 12TH
DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
____________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Julie Hanson, City Clerk
ABSTRACT OF BIDS * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error
2021 PMP STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. PW-21-0100
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MN
BMI PROJECT NO. T13.122417
2/24/2021
10:00 a.m.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Engineer's Estimate C & L Excavating T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.Kuechle Underground Northwest Meyer Contracting Veit & Company, Inc.Park Construction Co.RL Larson Excavators, Inc.Geislinger & Sons, Inc.Northdale Construction Co.Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.ITEM APPROX.Bolton & Menk, Inc.
NO.ITEM NOTES QUANT.UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 MOBILIZATION 1.00 LUMP SUM $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $133,000.00 $133,000.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $54,000.00 $54,000.00 $173,762.00 $173,762.00 $151,103.69 $151,103.69 $190,500.00 $190,500.00 $166,400.00 $166,400.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $127,000.00 $127,000.00 $47,455.00 $47,455.00 $166,000.00 $166,000.00
2 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE 1.00 LUMP SUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
3 CLEARING 19.00 TREE $400.00 $7,600.00 $515.00 $9,785.00 $500.00 $9,500.00 $500.00 $9,500.00 $550.00 $10,450.00 $700.00 $13,300.00 $575.00 $10,925.00 $500.00 $9,500.00 $525.00 $9,975.00 $350.00 $6,650.00 $525.00 $9,975.00 $500.00 $9,500.00
4 GRUBBING 19.00 TREE $300.00 $5,700.00 $515.00 $9,785.00 $500.00 $9,500.00 $600.00 $11,400.00 $550.00 $10,450.00 $300.00 $5,700.00 $575.00 $10,925.00 $500.00 $9,500.00 $525.00 $9,975.00 $200.00 $3,800.00 $525.00 $9,975.00 $500.00 $9,500.00
5 SALVAGE SIGN 17.00 EACH $40.00 $680.00 $45.00 $765.00 $50.00 $850.00 $40.00 $680.00 $50.00 $850.00 $40.00 $680.00 $46.00 $782.00 $40.00 $680.00 $50.00 $850.00 $45.00 $765.00 $42.00 $714.00 $40.00 $680.00
6 SALVAGE MAIL BOX 80.00 EACH $150.00 $12,000.00 $47.00 $3,760.00 $30.00 $2,400.00 $45.00 $3,600.00 $49.50 $3,960.00 $45.00 $3,600.00 $51.00 $4,080.00 $45.00 $3,600.00 $50.00 $4,000.00 $47.00 $3,760.00 $47.25 $3,780.00 $45.00 $3,600.00
7 SALVAGE PAVERS 52.00 SQ FT $10.00 $520.00 $5.00 $260.00 $5.00 $260.00 $10.00 $520.00 $10.00 $520.00 $13.31 $692.12 $41.00 $2,132.00 $11.30 $587.60 $25.00 $1,300.00 $6.00 $312.00 $15.00 $780.00 $6.00 $312.00
8 SALVAGE RETAINING WALL (BLOCK)47.00 SQ FT $15.00 $705.00 $7.00 $329.00 $5.00 $235.00 $10.00 $470.00 $10.00 $470.00 $14.73 $692.31 $45.00 $2,115.00 $12.50 $587.50 $25.00 $1,175.00 $20.00 $940.00 $15.00 $705.00 $8.00 $376.00
9 SALVAGE RETAINING WALL (WOOD TIMBER)14.00 LIN FT $15.00 $210.00 $10.00 $140.00 $5.00 $70.00 $10.00 $140.00 $15.00 $210.00 $55.50 $777.00 $61.00 $854.00 $21.00 $294.00 $50.00 $700.00 $50.00 $700.00 $15.00 $210.00 $60.00 $840.00
10 TREE TRIMMING 1.00 LUMP SUM $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,770.00 $15,770.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
11 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 7.00 EACH $450.00 $3,150.00 $400.00 $2,800.00 $615.00 $4,305.00 $560.00 $3,920.00 $400.00 $2,800.00 $550.22 $3,851.54 $578.00 $4,046.00 $517.00 $3,619.00 $670.00 $4,690.00 $400.00 $2,800.00 $600.13 $4,200.91 $400.00 $2,800.00
12 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE 1.00 EACH $550.00 $550.00 $400.00 $400.00 $615.00 $615.00 $560.00 $560.00 $500.00 $500.00 $551.65 $551.65 $831.00 $831.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $500.00 $500.00 $600.13 $600.13 $600.00 $600.00
13 REMOVE CASTING 25.00 EACH $250.00 $6,250.00 $200.00 $5,000.00 $125.00 $3,125.00 $143.00 $3,575.00 $150.00 $3,750.00 $89.46 $2,236.50 $62.00 $1,550.00 $108.00 $2,700.00 $200.00 $5,000.00 $125.00 $3,125.00 $150.00 $3,750.00 $150.00 $3,750.00
14 REMOVE HYDRANT 11.00 EACH $400.00 $4,400.00 $200.00 $2,200.00 $615.00 $6,765.00 $290.00 $3,190.00 $200.00 $2,200.00 $366.41 $4,030.51 $242.00 $2,662.00 $774.00 $8,514.00 $600.00 $6,600.00 $125.00 $1,375.00 $600.13 $6,601.43 $600.00 $6,600.00
15 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)524.00 LIN FT $7.00 $3,668.00 $5.50 $2,882.00 $3.00 $1,572.00 $3.00 $1,572.00 $5.00 $2,620.00 $4.51 $2,363.24 $5.50 $2,882.00 $4.85 $2,541.40 $7.00 $3,668.00 $5.00 $2,620.00 $5.25 $2,751.00 $6.00 $3,144.00
16 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)1214.00 LIN FT $4.00 $4,856.00 $2.00 $2,428.00 $2.00 $2,428.00 $3.00 $3,642.00 $4.00 $4,856.00 $1.72 $2,088.08 $2.10 $2,549.40 $1.85 $2,245.90 $5.00 $6,070.00 $4.00 $4,856.00 $2.10 $2,549.40 $3.00 $3,642.00
17 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER 1166.00 LIN FT $6.00 $6,996.00 $6.50 $7,579.00 $4.50 $5,247.00 $3.00 $3,498.00 $5.00 $5,830.00 $5.72 $6,669.52 $2.70 $3,148.20 $3.35 $3,906.10 $3.00 $3,498.00 $3.00 $3,498.00 $5.00 $5,830.00 $3.50 $4,081.00
18 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)245.00 LIN FT $10.00 $2,450.00 $10.00 $2,450.00 $10.00 $2,450.00 $18.00 $4,410.00 $10.00 $2,450.00 $18.01 $4,412.45 $21.00 $5,145.00 $17.10 $4,189.50 $20.00 $4,900.00 $20.00 $4,900.00 $10.00 $2,450.00 $16.00 $3,920.00
19 REMOVE WATERMAIN 2721.00 LIN FT $8.00 $21,768.00 $1.00 $2,721.00 $5.00 $13,605.00 $0.50 $1,360.50 $8.00 $21,768.00 $10.66 $29,005.86 $4.00 $10,884.00 $11.90 $32,379.90 $2.00 $5,442.00 $3.00 $8,163.00 $5.00 $13,605.00 $13.00 $35,373.00
20 ABANDON WATER MAIN 1305.00 LIN FT $8.00 $10,440.00 $3.00 $3,915.00 $5.00 $6,525.00 $5.00 $6,525.00 $8.00 $10,440.00 $8.88 $11,588.40 $9.00 $11,745.00 $3.20 $4,176.00 $5.00 $6,525.00 $6.00 $7,830.00 $5.00 $6,525.00 $7.00 $9,135.00
21 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 979.00 SQ YD $10.00 $9,790.00 $3.75 $3,671.25 $5.00 $4,895.00 $3.00 $2,937.00 $6.00 $5,874.00 $5.81 $5,687.99 $4.60 $4,503.40 $14.90 $14,587.10 $6.00 $5,874.00 $8.00 $7,832.00 $7.50 $7,342.50 $10.00 $9,790.00
22 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 1260.00 SQ YD $7.00 $8,820.00 $4.75 $5,985.00 $5.00 $6,300.00 $3.00 $3,780.00 $5.00 $6,300.00 $2.83 $3,565.80 $2.50 $3,150.00 $15.60 $19,656.00 $6.00 $7,560.00 $5.00 $6,300.00 $5.00 $6,300.00 $8.00 $10,080.00
23 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK 106.00 SQ YD $12.00 $1,272.00 $12.50 $1,325.00 $5.00 $530.00 $3.00 $318.00 $4.00 $424.00 $5.25 $556.50 $2.80 $296.80 $7.75 $821.50 $10.00 $1,060.00 $8.00 $848.00 $7.50 $795.00 $9.00 $954.00
24 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK 2021.00 SQ FT $1.00 $2,021.00 $1.75 $3,536.75 $0.75 $1,515.75 $1.00 $2,021.00 $2.00 $4,042.00 $0.32 $646.72 $2.50 $5,052.50 $0.85 $1,717.85 $1.00 $2,021.00 $1.00 $2,021.00 $0.75 $1,515.75 $2.00 $4,042.00
25 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION 32.00 HOUR $800.00 $25,600.00 $850.00 $27,200.00 $900.00 $28,800.00 $720.00 $23,040.00 $350.00 $11,200.00 $828.20 $26,502.40 $767.00 $24,544.00 $509.00 $16,288.00 $500.00 $16,000.00 $500.00 $16,000.00 $1,187.50 $38,000.00 $500.00 $16,000.00
26 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) (P) 13403.00 CU YD $22.00 $294,866.00 $19.00 $254,657.00 $29.19 $391,233.57 $13.00 $174,239.00 $22.30 $298,886.90 $12.67 $169,816.01 $23.30 $312,289.90 $22.50 $301,567.50 $30.00 $402,090.00 $22.00 $294,866.00 $21.00 $281,463.00 $17.00 $227,851.00
27 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)648.00 CU YD $18.00 $11,664.00 $9.50 $6,156.00 $18.00 $11,664.00 $13.00 $8,424.00 $22.30 $14,450.40 $14.35 $9,298.80 $20.60 $13,348.80 $21.50 $13,932.00 $22.50 $14,580.00 $17.00 $11,016.00 $21.00 $13,608.00 $27.00 $17,496.00
28 STABILIZING AGGREGATE 648.00 CU YD $40.00 $25,920.00 $5.00 $3,240.00 $35.00 $22,680.00 $20.00 $12,960.00 $33.00 $21,384.00 $37.39 $24,228.72 $17.03 $11,035.44 $24.60 $15,940.80 $5.00 $3,240.00 $28.00 $18,144.00 $69.78 $45,217.44 $15.00 $9,720.00
29 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) 6050.00 CU YD $22.00 $133,100.00 $26.75 $161,837.50 $20.00 $121,000.00 $29.00 $175,450.00 $30.00 $181,500.00 $30.96 $187,308.00 $22.00 $133,100.00 $34.80 $210,540.00 $30.00 $181,500.00 $23.50 $142,175.00 $29.13 $176,236.50 $28.00 $169,400.00
30 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V 19833.00 SQ YD $2.00 $39,666.00 $2.10 $41,649.30 $2.65 $52,557.45 $1.51 $29,947.83 $1.20 $23,799.60 $1.29 $25,584.57 $1.05 $20,824.65 $1.90 $37,682.70 $2.00 $39,666.00 $2.75 $54,540.75 $2.01 $39,864.33 $2.00 $39,666.00
31 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 8200.00 SQ YD $2.00 $16,400.00 $2.75 $22,550.00 $1.00 $8,200.00 $1.00 $8,200.00 $2.80 $22,960.00 $2.62 $21,484.00 $0.45 $3,690.00 $0.89 $7,298.00 $1.75 $14,350.00 $8.00 $65,600.00 $2.00 $16,400.00 $4.00 $32,800.00
32 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 7568.00 TON $18.00 $136,224.00 $15.75 $119,196.00 $0.01 $75.68 $0.01 $75.68 $17.50 $132,440.00 $6.66 $50,402.88 $11.75 $88,924.00 $14.50 $109,736.00 $18.00 $136,224.00 $13.00 $98,384.00 $16.97 $128,428.96 $22.00 $166,496.00
33 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2 15.00 TON $50.00 $750.00 $80.00 $1,200.00 $20.00 $300.00 $40.00 $600.00 $35.00 $525.00 $75.77 $1,136.55 $36.00 $540.00 $53.70 $805.50 $50.00 $750.00 $40.00 $600.00 $27.35 $410.25 $150.00 $2,250.00
34 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 24539.00 SQ YD $2.50 $61,347.50 $1.55 $38,035.45 $1.50 $36,808.50 $8.00 $196,312.00 $0.65 $15,950.35 $2.72 $66,746.08 $0.65 $15,950.35 $1.40 $34,354.60 $3.50 $85,886.50 $1.50 $36,808.50 $2.98 $73,126.22 $3.00 $73,617.00
35 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 1630.00 GAL $4.00 $6,520.00 $3.30 $5,379.00 $0.01 $16.30 $3.20 $5,216.00 $2.50 $4,075.00 $3.20 $5,216.00 $3.60 $5,868.00 $2.55 $4,156.50 $3.30 $5,379.00 $2.00 $3,260.00 $3.36 $5,476.80 $4.00 $6,520.00
36 TYPE SPWEA240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 2946.00 TON $80.00 $235,680.00 $69.00 $203,274.00 $68.50 $201,801.00 $67.00 $197,382.00 $65.85 $193,994.10 $67.07 $197,588.22 $76.00 $223,896.00 $68.60 $202,095.60 $69.00 $203,274.00 $74.00 $218,004.00 $70.42 $207,457.32 $68.00 $200,328.00
37 TYPE SPNWB230C NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 2946.00 TON $72.00 $212,112.00 $66.00 $194,436.00 $68.10 $200,622.60 $64.00 $188,544.00 $63.80 $187,954.80 $64.16 $189,015.36 $72.70 $214,174.20 $70.10 $206,514.60 $66.00 $194,436.00 $68.00 $200,328.00 $67.37 $198,472.02 $65.00 $191,490.00
38 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 746.00 SQ YD $40.00 $29,840.00 $33.00 $24,618.00 $24.00 $17,904.00 $26.00 $19,396.00 $39.30 $29,317.80 $41.15 $30,697.90 $37.40 $27,900.40 $45.90 $34,241.40 $36.00 $26,856.00 $34.50 $25,737.00 $42.43 $31,652.78 $40.00 $29,840.00
39 MANHOLE REHABILITATION 9.00 LIN FT $375.00 $3,375.00 $750.00 $6,750.00 $850.00 $7,650.00 $450.00 $4,050.00 $494.00 $4,446.00 $449.00 $4,041.00 $504.00 $4,536.00 $500.00 $4,500.00 $475.00 $4,275.00 $500.00 $4,500.00 $525.00 $4,725.00 $800.00 $7,200.00
40 LINING SEWER PIPE 8"197.00 LIN FT $30.00 $5,910.00 $37.00 $7,289.00 $36.00 $7,092.00 $47.00 $9,259.00 $51.59 $10,163.23 $35.20 $6,934.40 $52.00 $10,244.00 $74.50 $14,676.50 $37.00 $7,289.00 $37.00 $7,289.00 $49.25 $9,702.25 $50.00 $9,850.00
41 LINING SEWER PIPE 18"218.00 LIN FT $80.00 $17,440.00 $62.50 $13,625.00 $61.00 $13,298.00 $67.00 $14,606.00 $73.92 $16,114.56 $60.30 $13,145.40 $90.00 $19,620.00 $103.00 $22,454.00 $63.50 $13,843.00 $62.00 $13,516.00 $70.56 $15,382.08 $70.00 $15,260.00
42 LINING SEWER PIPE 21"1107.00 LIN FT $90.00 $99,630.00 $80.00 $88,560.00 $78.00 $86,346.00 $94.00 $104,058.00 $102.96 $113,976.72 $77.80 $86,124.60 $91.00 $100,737.00 $95.00 $105,165.00 $82.00 $90,774.00 $79.00 $87,453.00 $98.28 $108,795.96 $100.00 $110,700.00
43 TRIM PROTRUDING TAP 1.00 EACH $750.00 $750.00 $500.00 $500.00 $260.00 $260.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $257.70 $257.70 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $750.00 $750.00 $270.00 $270.00 $350.00 $350.00 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
44 CIPP SHORT LINER 2.00 EACH $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $3,100.00 $6,200.00 $3,410.00 $6,820.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,255.00 $6,510.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00
45 SEWER PIPE LATERAL GROUTING 16.00 EACH $1,000.00 $16,000.00 $340.00 $5,440.00 $775.00 $12,400.00 $330.00 $5,280.00 $357.50 $5,720.00 $325.00 $5,200.00 $368.00 $5,888.00 $675.00 $10,800.00 $345.00 $5,520.00 $350.00 $5,600.00 $341.25 $5,460.00 $400.00 $6,400.00
46 6" PVC PIPE SEWER 218.00 LIN FT $50.00 $10,900.00 $30.00 $6,540.00 $30.00 $6,540.00 $50.00 $10,900.00 $35.75 $7,793.50 $69.57 $15,166.26 $32.00 $6,976.00 $42.80 $9,330.40 $26.00 $5,668.00 $20.00 $4,360.00 $70.17 $15,297.06 $115.00 $25,070.00
47 8" PVC PIPE SEWER 48.00 LIN FT $60.00 $2,880.00 $65.00 $3,120.00 $65.00 $3,120.00 $111.00 $5,328.00 $40.80 $1,958.40 $40.64 $1,950.72 $44.00 $2,112.00 $54.20 $2,601.60 $95.00 $4,560.00 $90.00 $4,320.00 $73.34 $3,520.32 $350.00 $16,800.00
48 8"X6" PVC WYE 8.00 EACH $400.00 $3,200.00 $400.00 $3,200.00 $400.00 $3,200.00 $890.00 $7,120.00 $779.00 $6,232.00 $577.24 $4,617.92 $217.00 $1,736.00 $910.00 $7,280.00 $1,430.00 $11,440.00 $4,200.00 $33,600.00 $639.87 $5,118.96 $500.00 $4,000.00
49 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 8.00 EACH $450.00 $3,600.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $730.00 $5,840.00 $640.00 $5,120.00 $1,507.31 $12,058.48 $1,573.00 $12,584.00 $399.00 $3,192.00 $615.00 $4,920.00 $20.00 $160.00 $511.98 $4,095.84 $350.00 $2,800.00
50 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 19.00 EACH $1,000.00 $19,000.00 $875.00 $16,625.00 $900.00 $17,100.00 $1,100.00 $20,900.00 $966.00 $18,354.00 $1,507.31 $28,638.89 $409.00 $7,771.00 $405.00 $7,695.00 $1,220.00 $23,180.00 $1,500.00 $28,500.00 $1,205.91 $22,912.29 $400.00 $7,600.00
51 CONNECT TO EXISTING FORCEMAIN 1.00 EACH $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $5,025.00 $5,025.00 $1,094.86 $1,094.86 $1,821.00 $1,821.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,641.85 $2,641.85 $400.00 $400.00
52 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN)1.00 EACH $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,263.42 $3,263.42 $3,878.36 $3,878.36 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,375.00 $2,375.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00
53 SANITARY MANHOLE 11.30 LIN FT $350.00 $3,955.00 $425.00 $4,802.50 $450.00 $5,085.00 $650.00 $7,345.00 $781.00 $8,825.30 $497.08 $5,617.00 $911.00 $10,294.30 $471.00 $5,322.30 $415.00 $4,689.50 $1,000.00 $11,300.00 $345.07 $3,899.29 $450.00 $5,085.00
54 6" SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (PIPE BURST) - 6 INCH - HDPE DR 11 DIPS 870.00 LIN FT $85.00 $73,950.00 $65.00 $56,550.00 $70.00 $60,900.00 $89.00 $77,430.00 $58.05 $50,503.50 $45.95 $39,976.50 $56.00 $48,720.00 $47.20 $41,064.00 $60.00 $52,200.00 $73.00 $63,510.00 $58.27 $50,694.90 $64.00 $55,680.00
55 ACCESS PIT EXCAVATION W/ RECONNECTION 3.00 EACH $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,700.00 $8,100.00 $7,200.00 $21,600.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $6,117.72 $18,353.16 $8,111.00 $24,333.00 $5,470.00 $16,410.00 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,100.00 $24,300.00 $5,354.35 $16,063.05 $8,000.00 $24,000.00
56 6" SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (OPEN CUT) - 6 INCH - DIP 67.00 LIN FT $125.00 $8,375.00 $64.00 $4,288.00 $70.00 $4,690.00 $121.00 $8,107.00 $61.45 $4,117.15 $81.59 $5,466.53 $68.00 $4,556.00 $60.10 $4,026.70 $58.00 $3,886.00 $112.00 $7,504.00 $86.50 $5,795.50 $110.00 $7,370.00
57 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN 937.00 LIN FT $3.50 $3,279.50 $4.00 $3,748.00 $4.00 $3,748.00 $5.00 $4,685.00 $4.40 $4,122.80 $4.00 $3,748.00 $4.00 $3,748.00 $4.00 $3,748.00 $4.20 $3,935.40 $3.00 $2,811.00 $1.58 $1,480.46 $5.00 $4,685.00
58 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE FOR FORCEMAIN 1.00 LUMP SUM $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $14,723.00 $14,723.00 $27,722.53 $27,722.53 $21,346.00 $21,346.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $10,800.00 $10,800.00 $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $20,212.10 $20,212.10 $28,000.00 $28,000.00
59 PUBLIC/PRIVATE UTILITY DOCUMENTATION FOR PIPE BURSTING 1.00 LUMP SUM $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,700.00 $7,700.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,931.00 $7,931.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,350.00 $7,350.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,350.00 $7,350.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
60 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE 79.00 EACH $500.00 $39,500.00 $250.00 $19,750.00 $260.00 $20,540.00 $570.00 $45,030.00 $225.00 $17,775.00 $259.64 $20,511.56 $653.00 $51,587.00 $597.00 $47,163.00 $500.00 $39,500.00 $300.00 $23,700.00 $849.73 $67,128.67 $1,500.00 $118,500.00
61 HYDRANT 11.00 EACH $4,500.00 $49,500.00 $4,400.00 $48,400.00 $4,500.00 $49,500.00 $5,200.00 $57,200.00 $4,276.00 $47,036.00 $4,914.06 $54,054.66 $4,888.00 $53,768.00 $4,680.00 $51,480.00 $4,910.00 $54,010.00 $5,500.00 $60,500.00 $4,341.23 $47,753.53 $5,300.00 $58,300.00
62 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 13.00 EACH $1,800.00 $23,400.00 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 $1,700.00 $22,100.00 $2,500.00 $32,500.00 $1,603.00 $20,839.00 $2,081.24 $27,056.12 $1,463.00 $19,019.00 $1,720.00 $22,360.00 $1,710.00 $22,230.00 $1,800.00 $23,400.00 $1,665.64 $21,653.32 $2,200.00 $28,600.00
63 8" GATE VALVE & BOX 9.00 EACH $2,200.00 $19,800.00 $2,000.00 $18,000.00 $2,200.00 $19,800.00 $3,000.00 $27,000.00 $2,146.00 $19,314.00 $2,614.46 $23,530.14 $1,934.00 $17,406.00 $2,180.00 $19,620.00 $2,260.00 $20,340.00 $2,000.00 $18,000.00 $2,187.48 $19,687.32 $3,100.00 $27,900.00
64 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE 79.00 EACH $350.00 $27,650.00 $50.00 $3,950.00 $65.00 $5,135.00 $360.00 $28,440.00 $345.00 $27,255.00 $526.38 $41,584.02 $846.00 $66,834.00 $261.00 $20,619.00 $375.00 $29,625.00 $75.00 $5,925.00 $569.97 $45,027.63 $450.00 $35,550.00
65 ADJUST VALVE BOX 2.00 EACH $450.00 $900.00 $300.00 $600.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 $350.00 $700.00 $134.19 $268.38 $537.00 $1,074.00 $297.00 $594.00 $230.00 $460.00 $250.00 $500.00 $350.04 $700.08 $350.00 $700.00
66 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 8.00 EACH $1,500.00 $12,000.00 $1,200.00 $9,600.00 $1,300.00 $10,400.00 $2,000.00 $16,000.00 $1,310.00 $10,480.00 $2,396.89 $19,175.12 $1,248.00 $9,984.00 $1,430.00 $11,440.00 $1,420.00 $11,360.00 $1,500.00 $12,000.00 $1,469.25 $11,754.00 $1,300.00 $10,400.00
67 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 222.00 LIN FT $55.00 $12,210.00 $40.00 $8,880.00 $50.00 $11,100.00 $54.00 $11,988.00 $45.01 $9,992.22 $54.84 $12,174.48 $45.00 $9,990.00 $54.30 $12,054.60 $44.00 $9,768.00 $55.00 $12,210.00 $54.81 $12,167.82 $120.00 $26,640.00
68 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 3518.00 LIN FT $55.00 $193,490.00 $48.00 $168,864.00 $55.00 $193,490.00 $63.00 $221,634.00 $51.66 $181,739.88 $63.66 $223,955.88 $56.00 $197,008.00 $49.60 $174,492.80 $54.00 $189,972.00 $80.00 $281,440.00 $58.40 $205,451.20 $64.00 $225,152.00
69 12" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 6.00 LIN FT $85.00 $510.00 $185.00 $1,110.00 $190.00 $1,140.00 $210.00 $1,260.00 $77.92 $467.52 $215.77 $1,294.62 $188.00 $1,128.00 $289.00 $1,734.00 $250.00 $1,500.00 $211.00 $1,266.00 $97.57 $585.42 $475.00 $2,850.00
70 WATERMAIN FITTINGS 1802.00 POUND $8.00 $14,416.00 $7.00 $12,614.00 $8.00 $14,416.00 $9.00 $16,218.00 $6.20 $11,172.40 $11.41 $20,560.82 $6.00 $10,812.00 $8.60 $15,497.20 $7.25 $13,064.50 $6.50 $11,713.00 $9.73 $17,533.46 $5.00 $9,010.00
71 1" CURB STOP & BOX 79.00 EACH $400.00 $31,600.00 $385.00 $30,415.00 $400.00 $31,600.00 $530.00 $41,870.00 $553.00 $43,687.00 $653.64 $51,637.56 $382.00 $30,178.00 $377.00 $29,783.00 $800.00 $63,200.00 $250.00 $19,750.00 $438.90 $34,673.10 $600.00 $47,400.00
72 1" CORPORATION STOP 79.00 EACH $300.00 $23,700.00 $270.00 $21,330.00 $285.00 $22,515.00 $430.00 $33,970.00 $433.00 $34,207.00 $938.77 $74,162.83 $274.00 $21,646.00 $270.00 $21,330.00 $680.00 $53,720.00 $2,100.00 $165,900.00 $229.26 $18,111.54 $450.00 $35,550.00
73 FORD TYPE A-1 CURB BOX COVER 7.00 EACH $150.00 $1,050.00 $125.00 $875.00 $135.00 $945.00 $260.00 $1,820.00 $159.00 $1,113.00 $277.66 $1,943.62 $247.00 $1,729.00 $287.00 $2,009.00 $265.00 $1,855.00 $160.00 $1,120.00 $212.69 $1,488.83 $150.00 $1,050.00
74 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE 2700.00 LIN FT $35.00 $94,500.00 $24.00 $64,800.00 $27.00 $72,900.00 $41.00 $110,700.00 $38.52 $104,004.00 $35.53 $95,931.00 $22.00 $59,400.00 $37.20 $100,440.00 $18.00 $48,600.00 $6.00 $16,200.00 $45.39 $122,553.00 $48.00 $129,600.00
75 2" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 152.00 SQ YD $10.00 $1,520.00 $26.00 $3,952.00 $29.00 $4,408.00 $11.00 $1,672.00 $19.25 $2,926.00 $19.77 $3,005.04 $9.00 $1,368.00 $9.85 $1,497.20 $25.00 $3,800.00 $20.00 $3,040.00 $28.39 $4,315.28 $35.00 $5,320.00
76 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (STORM)8.00 EACH $700.00 $5,600.00 $450.00 $3,600.00 $350.00 $2,800.00 $430.00 $3,440.00 $850.00 $6,800.00 $463.47 $3,707.76 $670.00 $5,360.00 $477.00 $3,816.00 $350.00 $2,800.00 $450.00 $3,600.00 $626.25 $5,010.00 $550.00 $4,400.00
77 LOWER EXISTING MANHOLE (SANITARY)1.00 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $1,355.00 $1,355.00 $1,770.36 $1,770.36 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $774.00 $774.00 $400.00 $400.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,912.50 $2,912.50 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
78 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE R-1733 29.00 EACH $950.00 $27,550.00 $900.00 $26,100.00 $880.00 $25,520.00 $1,200.00 $34,800.00 $465.00 $13,485.00 $1,133.55 $32,872.95 $1,413.00 $40,977.00 $1,100.00 $31,900.00 $675.00 $19,575.00 $850.00 $24,650.00 $1,145.00 $33,205.00 $600.00 $17,400.00
79 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE R-3067-V 23.00 EACH $725.00 $16,675.00 $900.00 $20,700.00 $580.00 $13,340.00 $900.00 $20,700.00 $600.00 $13,800.00 $1,320.75 $30,377.25 $1,410.00 $32,430.00 $607.00 $13,961.00 $715.00 $16,445.00 $600.00 $13,800.00 $941.20 $21,647.60 $600.00 $13,800.00
80 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE R-4342 2.00 EACH $800.00 $1,600.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $950.00 $1,900.00 $365.00 $730.00 $1,058.41 $2,116.82 $1,181.00 $2,362.00 $688.00 $1,376.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,084.80 $2,169.60 $350.00 $700.00
81 12" RC PIPE SEWER 8.00 LIN FT $60.00 $480.00 $65.00 $520.00 $75.00 $600.00 $42.00 $336.00 $49.68 $397.44 $72.79 $582.32 $41.00 $328.00 $81.90 $655.20 $53.00 $424.00 $80.00 $640.00 $59.81 $478.48 $75.00 $600.00
82 15" RC PIPE SEWER 1826.00 LIN FT $52.00 $94,952.00 $45.00 $82,170.00 $50.00 $91,300.00 $45.00 $82,170.00 $47.48 $86,698.48 $44.90 $81,987.40 $44.00 $80,344.00 $46.40 $84,726.40 $50.00 $91,300.00 $50.00 $91,300.00 $59.79 $109,176.54 $44.00 $80,344.00
83 18" RC PIPE SEWER 929.00 LIN FT $57.00 $52,953.00 $47.00 $43,663.00 $50.00 $46,450.00 $48.00 $44,592.00 $50.90 $47,286.10 $48.58 $45,130.82 $49.00 $45,521.00 $49.00 $45,521.00 $55.00 $51,095.00 $55.00 $51,095.00 $62.31 $57,885.99 $47.00 $43,663.00
84 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 3.00 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $800.00 $2,400.00 $900.00 $2,700.00 $1,600.00 $4,800.00 $945.00 $2,835.00 $1,779.13 $5,337.39 $966.00 $2,898.00 $774.00 $2,322.00 $1,250.00 $3,750.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,456.25 $4,368.75 $800.00 $2,400.00
85 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 1.00 EACH $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $945.00 $945.00 $1,779.11 $1,779.11 $3,317.00 $3,317.00 $1,160.00 $1,160.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,852.08 $1,852.08 $800.00 $800.00
86 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 1.00 EACH $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $2,159.00 $2,159.00 $2,923.49 $2,923.49 $2,396.00 $2,396.00 $2,530.00 $2,530.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,113.79 $2,113.79 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
87 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4022 5.00 EACH $2,500.00 $12,500.00 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 $2,300.00 $11,500.00 $3,300.00 $16,500.00 $1,993.00 $9,965.00 $2,952.36 $14,761.80 $2,525.00 $12,625.00 $2,400.00 $12,000.00 $2,360.00 $11,800.00 $2,800.00 $14,000.00 $2,246.28 $11,231.40 $2,600.00 $13,000.00
88 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 2.00 EACH $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $4,200.00 $8,400.00 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 $5,100.00 $10,200.00 $3,843.00 $7,686.00 $4,771.27 $9,542.54 $4,200.00 $8,400.00 $4,120.00 $8,240.00 $5,200.00 $10,400.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,744.97 $7,489.94 $4,800.00 $9,600.00
89 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN - DESIGN R-1, 2'X3'18.00 EACH $1,800.00 $32,400.00 $1,700.00 $30,600.00 $1,800.00 $32,400.00 $1,700.00 $30,600.00 $1,360.00 $24,480.00 $2,317.72 $41,718.96 $1,611.00 $28,998.00 $1,520.00 $27,360.00 $1,805.00 $32,490.00 $1,850.00 $33,300.00 $1,677.49 $30,194.82 $1,700.00 $30,600.00
90 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE - DESIGN H 1.00 EACH $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,023.00 $1,023.00 $1,354.79 $1,354.79 $1,333.00 $1,333.00 $1,280.00 $1,280.00 $1,580.00 $1,580.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $1,456.14 $1,456.14 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
91 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE - DESIGN G 1.00 EACH $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,315.00 $1,315.00 $2,369.59 $2,369.59 $2,106.00 $2,106.00 $2,080.00 $2,080.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,063.88 $2,063.88 $2,300.00 $2,300.00
92 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN 1472.00 LIN FT $15.00 $22,080.00 $8.50 $12,512.00 $20.00 $29,440.00 $16.00 $23,552.00 $20.00 $29,440.00 $18.39 $27,070.08 $18.00 $26,496.00 $23.90 $35,180.80 $13.00 $19,136.00 $27.00 $39,744.00 $32.93 $48,472.96 $20.00 $29,440.00
93 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT 30.00 EACH $250.00 $7,500.00 $125.00 $3,750.00 $425.00 $12,750.00 $310.00 $9,300.00 $289.00 $8,670.00 $280.29 $8,408.70 $250.00 $7,500.00 $258.00 $7,740.00 $250.00 $7,500.00 $450.00 $13,500.00 $298.67 $8,960.10 $500.00 $15,000.00
94 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS 3 15.00 CU YD $100.00 $1,500.00 $85.00 $1,275.00 $90.00 $1,350.00 $120.00 $1,800.00 $85.00 $1,275.00 $124.24 $1,863.60 $126.00 $1,890.00 $109.00 $1,635.00 $100.00 $1,500.00 $90.00 $1,350.00 $150.00 $2,250.00 $120.00 $1,800.00
95 4" CONCRETE WALK 111.00 SQ FT $7.50 $832.50 $14.00 $1,554.00 $13.00 $1,443.00 $14.00 $1,554.00 $14.75 $1,637.25 $20.70 $2,297.70 $16.00 $1,776.00 $15.20 $1,687.20 $16.00 $1,776.00 $13.50 $1,498.50 $14.13 $1,568.43 $14.00 $1,554.00
96 6" CONCRETE WALK (PEDESTRIAN RAMP)541.00 SQ FT $13.00 $7,033.00 $16.50 $8,926.50 $16.00 $8,656.00 $16.00 $8,656.00 $17.50 $9,467.50 $17.93 $9,700.13 $18.50 $10,008.50 $17.80 $9,629.80 $18.00 $9,738.00 $16.50 $8,926.50 $16.75 $9,061.75 $17.00 $9,197.00
97 3" BITUMINOUS WALK 1432.00 SQ FT $4.00 $5,728.00 $5.50 $7,876.00 $2.00 $2,864.00 $4.14 $5,928.48 $4.35 $6,229.20 $5.89 $8,434.48 $6.00 $8,592.00 $5.35 $7,661.20 $6.00 $8,592.00 $4.75 $6,802.00 $5.35 $7,661.20 $5.00 $7,160.00
98 REINSTALL PAVERS 47.00 SQ FT $20.00 $940.00 $16.00 $752.00 $15.00 $705.00 $23.00 $1,081.00 $15.00 $705.00 $12.13 $570.11 $41.00 $1,927.00 $31.30 $1,471.10 $30.00 $1,410.00 $50.00 $2,350.00 $50.93 $2,393.71 $12.00 $564.00
99 REINSTALL RETAINING WALL (BLOCK)47.00 SQ FT $20.00 $940.00 $10.00 $470.00 $45.00 $2,115.00 $30.00 $1,410.00 $20.00 $940.00 $15.85 $744.95 $45.00 $2,115.00 $31.30 $1,471.10 $30.00 $1,410.00 $50.00 $2,350.00 $50.14 $2,356.58 $35.00 $1,645.00
100 REINSTALL RETAINING WALL (WOOD TIMBER)14.00 LIN FT $20.00 $280.00 $28.00 $392.00 $64.00 $896.00 $200.00 $2,800.00 $20.00 $280.00 $44.32 $620.48 $61.25 $857.50 $63.10 $883.40 $50.00 $700.00 $50.00 $700.00 $50.40 $705.60 $80.00 $1,120.00
101 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 9525.00 LIN FT $17.00 $161,925.00 $14.75 $140,493.75 $15.00 $142,875.00 $14.00 $133,350.00 $15.68 $149,352.00 $14.25 $135,731.25 $16.15 $153,828.75 $14.30 $136,207.50 $15.00 $142,875.00 $14.50 $138,112.50 $14.96 $142,494.00 $15.00 $142,875.00
102 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE 30.00 LIN FT $18.00 $540.00 $30.00 $900.00 $25.00 $750.00 $25.00 $750.00 $27.50 $825.00 $25.00 $750.00 $28.30 $849.00 $25.00 $750.00 $26.25 $787.50 $30.00 $900.00 $26.25 $787.50 $25.00 $750.00
103 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (SPOT REPLACEMENT)946.00 LIN FT $30.00 $28,380.00 $26.00 $24,596.00 $25.00 $23,650.00 $25.00 $23,650.00 $27.50 $26,015.00 $25.00 $23,650.00 $28.30 $26,771.80 $25.00 $23,650.00 $26.25 $24,832.50 $25.50 $24,123.00 $31.25 $29,562.50 $25.00 $23,650.00
104 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 1270.00 SQ YD $60.00 $76,200.00 $59.00 $74,930.00 $55.00 $69,850.00 $58.00 $73,660.00 $69.40 $88,138.00 $70.66 $89,738.20 $61.50 $78,105.00 $64.90 $82,423.00 $63.00 $80,010.00 $60.00 $76,200.00 $71.70 $91,059.00 $61.00 $77,470.00
105 TRUNCATED DOMES 84.00 SQ FT $55.00 $4,620.00 $52.00 $4,368.00 $50.00 $4,200.00 $50.00 $4,200.00 $55.00 $4,620.00 $50.00 $4,200.00 $56.50 $4,746.00 $50.00 $4,200.00 $53.00 $4,452.00 $55.00 $4,620.00 $53.50 $4,494.00 $50.00 $4,200.00
106 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 LUMP SUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $7,300.00 $7,300.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,410.00 $4,410.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
107 INSTALL SIGN 17.00 EACH $175.00 $2,975.00 $150.00 $2,550.00 $145.00 $2,465.00 $140.00 $2,380.00 $148.00 $2,516.00 $140.00 $2,380.00 $160.00 $2,720.00 $140.00 $2,380.00 $140.00 $2,380.00 $150.00 $2,550.00 $147.00 $2,499.00 $140.00 $2,380.00
108 SIGN POST 2.00 EACH $150.00 $300.00 $50.00 $100.00 $27.00 $54.00 $25.00 $50.00 $95.00 $190.00 $25.00 $50.00 $29.00 $58.00 $25.00 $50.00 $90.00 $180.00 $30.00 $60.00 $26.25 $52.50 $25.00 $50.00
109 SIGN PANEL TYPE C 12.00 SQ FT $30.00 $360.00 $33.00 $396.00 $32.00 $384.00 $31.00 $372.00 $50.00 $600.00 $30.50 $366.00 $35.00 $420.00 $30.50 $366.00 $50.00 $600.00 $35.00 $420.00 $32.03 $384.36 $31.00 $372.00
110 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 40.00 EACH $200.00 $8,000.00 $125.00 $5,000.00 $90.00 $3,600.00 $450.00 $18,000.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 $169.85 $6,794.00 $167.00 $6,680.00 $198.00 $7,920.00 $250.00 $10,000.00 $150.00 $6,000.00 $250.00 $10,000.00 $150.00 $6,000.00
111 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 5.00 EACH $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $750.00 $3,750.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 $830.00 $4,150.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,737.13 $13,685.65 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,900.00 $9,500.00 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 $1,500.08 $7,500.40 $1,500.00 $7,500.00
112 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER 600.00 LIN FT $10.00 $6,000.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $3.00 $1,800.00 $3.95 $2,370.00 $5.00 $3,000.00 $4.63 $2,778.00 $6.00 $3,600.00 $3.95 $2,370.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $5.00 $3,000.00 $4.00 $2,400.00
113 INSTALL MAIL BOX 80.00 EACH $200.00 $16,000.00 $57.00 $4,560.00 $55.00 $4,400.00 $55.00 $4,400.00 $49.50 $3,960.00 $55.00 $4,400.00 $62.00 $4,960.00 $55.00 $4,400.00 $60.00 $4,800.00 $60.00 $4,800.00 $57.75 $4,620.00 $55.00 $4,400.00
114 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX 85.00 EACH $120.00 $10,200.00 $42.00 $3,570.00 $40.00 $3,400.00 $40.00 $3,400.00 $45.00 $3,825.00 $40.00 $3,400.00 $45.00 $3,825.00 $40.00 $3,400.00 $45.00 $3,825.00 $45.00 $3,825.00 $42.00 $3,570.00 $40.00 $3,400.00
115 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B 18.00 EACH $550.00 $9,900.00 $575.00 $10,350.00 $600.00 $10,800.00 $500.00 $9,000.00 $676.00 $12,168.00 $593.00 $10,674.00 $837.00 $15,066.00 $593.00 $10,674.00 $605.00 $10,890.00 $675.00 $12,150.00 $404.25 $7,276.50 $593.00 $10,674.00
116 HYDROMULCH TYPE 7 & SEED MIX 25-151 400.00 SQ YD $3.00 $1,200.00 $3.00 $1,200.00 $3.00 $1,200.00 $2.50 $1,000.00 $3.30 $1,320.00 $2.50 $1,000.00 $4.00 $1,600.00 $2.50 $1,000.00 $3.00 $1,200.00 $3.00 $1,200.00 $2.63 $1,052.00 $3.00 $1,200.00
117 SODDING TYPE LAWN 8411.00 SQ YD $5.00 $42,055.00 $6.60 $55,512.60 $6.50 $54,671.50 $6.39 $53,746.29 $7.00 $58,877.00 $6.36 $53,493.96 $9.40 $79,063.40 $6.40 $53,830.40 $7.50 $63,082.50 $8.00 $67,288.00 $6.71 $56,437.81 $7.00 $58,877.00
118 SHREDDED WOOD MULCH 10.00 CU YD $35.00 $350.00 $65.00 $650.00 $38.00 $380.00 $75.00 $750.00 $39.00 $390.00 $45.00 $450.00 $81.25 $812.50 $45.00 $450.00 $50.00 $500.00 $70.00 $700.00 $52.50 $525.00 $45.00 $450.00
119 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)1623.00 CU YD $25.00 $40,575.00 $27.50 $44,632.50 $29.00 $47,067.00 $25.00 $40,575.00 $32.00 $51,936.00 $39.81 $64,611.63 $30.25 $49,095.75 $33.50 $54,370.50 $0.01 $16.23 $27.00 $43,821.00 $35.00 $56,805.00 $30.00 $48,690.00
120 CROSSWALK MARKING - MULTI-COMPONENT LIQUID 90.00 SQ FT $15.00 $1,350.00 $8.00 $720.00 $25.00 $2,250.00 $7.30 $657.00 $5.50 $495.00 $6.99 $629.10 $8.30 $747.00 $7.20 $648.00 $6.00 $540.00 $8.00 $720.00 $19.95 $1,795.50 $7.20 $648.00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID $3,234,599.50 $2,704,412.10 $2,866,599.35 $2,886,894.78 $2,995,268.10 $3,022,073.96 $3,061,031.90 $3,063,436.45 $3,152,660.63 $3,153,190.75 $3,184,976.76 $3,320,288.00
10:00 a.m.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Engineer's Estimate C & L Excavating T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.Kuechle Underground Northwest Meyer Contracting Veit & Company, Inc.Park Construction Co.RL Larson Excavators, Inc.Geislinger & Sons, Inc.Northdale Construction Co.Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.ITEM APPROX.Bolton & Menk, Inc.
NO.ITEM NOTES QUANT.UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Page 1 of 2
DATE: April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements – Accept Feasibility Report
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$1,120,000 $1,242,560 PIR, Utility Funds,
(2021-2025 CIP Area 1) (Recommendation Area 1) Assessments
Council Should Consider
Motions to approve, table, or deny the following:
• Adopting Resolution 2021-022 Receiving the Feasibility Report and Ordering the Public
Hearing to be held on April 26, 2021, for the Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E
Improvements.
All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted.
Background/Discussion
On August 26, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-026 ordering the preparation of a
feasibility report for the 2020 pavement management program. The proposed improvements included
Old Snelling Avenue from approximately Arden Oaks Drive to Trunk Highway 51 and County Road
E from Ridgewood Road to Pascal Avenue.
The feasibility report describes proposed street and utility improvements organized into two separate
areas. Area 1 involves improvements to the 4,300-ft long segment of Snelling Avenue North located
south of County Road E as well as street improvements to Cummings Lane and the intersection at
Bussard Court. Area 2 involves improvements to the intersection of Snelling Avenue North at
County Road E. Given Ramsey County has rescheduled these intersection improvements to 2023 in
their Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), it is recommended further traffic studies and analysis be
conducted in the interim.
In accordance with Council direction, a Feasibility Report has been prepared that details the proposed
improvements, neighborhood impacts, estimated costs and financing for the proposed project. A copy
of the Feasibility Report is attached (Attachment A).
NEW BUSINESS – 9C
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
A significant portion of the report is focused on an analysis of two design alternatives for Snelling
Avenue North extending to the south of County Road E (Area 1). Alternative 1 consisting of road
improvements that include the addition of a pedestrian trail along the west side of the roadway.
Alternative 2 consists of roadway improvements that exclude the trail construction, but maintains 8-ft
wide paved shoulders along the length of the road.
Based on the December 21, 2020 Work Session discussions, the City Council requested staff to
consider additional measures that could be incorporated into the design for Alternative 2 to provide
additional safety measures for pedestrians using the west shoulder area. Six additional strategies were
added to page 13 and page 14 of the feasibility report and it states that these strategies should be
further developed during the design process. Since the last Work Session, additional Public comments
have been added to Appendix J. The recommendations are outlined in section 7 of the feasibility
report.
Attached is Resolution 2021-022 which receives the feasibility report and orders the public hearing be
held on April 26, 2021. Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution in order to have this project
proceed to a public hearing. If adopted, staff would mail notices to each property owner in the
proposed assessment area stating the time of the hearing, the general nature of the improvements, the
estimated project cost, the proposed assessment area, and an estimate of the assessment amount.
Budget Impact
Proposed project funding sources are a combination of the City’s Permanent Improvement Revolving
(PIR) fund, utility funds, Ramsey County, Municipal State Aid, and special assessments for street
improvements described in section 5 of the feasibility report and summarized in the following table.
Area 1: Snelling Avenue North from CR E to Highway 51, including Bussard Ct. intersection
Area 2: Roundabout Intersection Improvements at Snelling Ave and County Road E
Alternative 1: Reconstruction with addition of pedestrian trail
Alternative 2: Full depth reclamation with no trail construction
Attachments
Attachment A: Feasibility Report
Attachment B: Resolution 2021-022
FEASIBILITY REPORT
SNELLING AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD E
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
City Project No. PW-20-0100
January 11, 2021
Prepared by: City of Arden Hills
Public Works Department
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
This page intentionally blank
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Feasibility Report
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
TITLE SHEET
CERTIFICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Authorization
1.2 Project Scope
1.3 Available Data
1.4 Previous Studies
2. Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Land Use
2.2 Streets
2.3 Intersection Conditions
2.4 Sanitary Sewer
2.5 Water Main
2.6 Drainage
2.7 Environmental Conditions
2.8 Private Utilities
3. Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................... 11
3.1 Street Improvements, Area 1
3.2 Street Improvements, Area 2
3.3 Street Improvements, Cummings Ln and Bussard Ct
3.4 Utility Improvements, Area 1
3.5 Utility Improvements, Area 2
3.6 Easements
3.7 Permits/Approvals
3.8 Construction Access and Staging
4. Public Involvement ........................................................................................................ 18
5. Estimated Cost and Funding ........................................................................................ 19
5.1 Opinion of Cost
5.2 Project Funding
5.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll
6. Project Schedule ............................................................................................................. 23
7. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................. 24
8. Feasibility, Necessity and Cost Effectiveness .............................................................. 25
Appendix A: Study Area Map
Appendix B: Intersection Control Evaluation Report
Appendix C: Geotechnical Report
Appendix D: Sanitary, Water and Drainage Improvements Maps
Appendix E: Wetland Delineation Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Feasibility Report
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
Appendix F: Environmental Investigation Documents
Appendix G: Area 1, Alternative 1 Schematic Layout
Appendix H: Area 1, Alternative 2 Schematic Layout
Appendix I: Area 2 Roundabout Schematic Layout
Appendix J: Public Involvement Information
Appendix K: Itemized Opinion of Probable Costs
Appendix L: Preliminary Assessment Maps and Preliminary Assessment Roll
Feasibility Report Page 1
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Authorization
On August 26, 2019, the Arden Hills City Council adopted Resolution 2019-026 ordering
the preparation of an engineering feasibility study for the Old Snelling Avenue and County
Road E Improvement Project. The resolution directs staff to study the need, cost-
effectiveness and feasibility of potential infrastructure improvements within the proposed
project area. During the project investigation, soil contamination was identified within the
project corridor, which resulted in an expanded scope of work and extended time line for the
feasibility study as further described in Section 2.
1.2 Project Scope
This report investigates the feasibility of street and utility improvements identified within the
City of Arden Hills Capital Improvement Program titled Old Snelling Avenue PMP with
Intersection Improvements at County Road E and local streets directly adjacent to the
Snelling Avenue corridor. The project was identified as a result of deteriorating street
pavement conditions, traffic delays at the intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County
Road E, and potential deterioration of water main, sanitary sewer and drainage infrastructure.
The project is separated into two distinct parts as described below.
Area 1 – Snelling Avenue North
▪ Snelling Avenue North (MSAS 111) from County Road E to State Trunk Highway 51
▪ Bussard Court from Snelling Avenue North to 100 feet west of Snelling Avenue North
▪ Cummings Lane from Snelling Avenue North to east terminus
Area 2 – Intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E
▪ Snelling Avenue North (CSAH 76) from County Road E to Arden Oaks Drive
▪ Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to 375 feet south of intersection
▪ Lake Johanna Blvd (CSAH 149) from Snelling Avenue N to Ridgewood Road
▪ County Road E (CSAH 15) from Snelling Avenue N to Pascal Avenue
A map depicting the location of potential street and utility improvements is provided in
Appendix A.
This report includes specific recommendations regarding the scope of improvements,
estimated project costs, funding sources, estimated assessments and a project delivery
schedule. Improvements considered within this report include street reconstruction,
intersection improvements, pedestrian trail construction, water main replacement, sanitary
sewer repairs and drainage improvements.
Feasibility Report Page 2
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
1.3 Available Data
▪ City of Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan
▪ City of Arden Hills Engineering Record Plans
▪ Intersection Control Evaluation, 2018
▪ Factual Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review, dated November 7, 2019
▪ Geotechnical Memorandum, dated October 7, 2020
▪ Pavement Condition Ratings within the project area
▪ Sanitary and Storm Sewer CCTV Televising Inspections Data by the City
▪ Storm Sewer CCTV Televising Inspections provided by Ramsey County
▪ Water Main break and leak history database
▪ GIS database for infrastructure conditions
▪ Field observations of project area
▪ City of Arden Hills Assessment Policy
▪ Arden Hills Engineering Design Standards
1.4 Previous Studies
Over the past ten years, the City of Arden Hills completed three studies focused on potential
improvements to Old Snelling Avenue within the proposed project area. A brief summary
of the three documents is provided below.
Preliminary Scoping Document, Old Snelling Avenue Improvements (2010)
The City completed a preliminary scoping document for proposed improvements to Old
Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to TH 51 in December 2010. This study
reviewed five project alternatives as described below.
▪ Alternative 1: Urban Reconstruction (with parking on both sides): Full road
reconstruction with one 12 foot driving lane in each direction, eight foot paved shoulders
for parking, and concrete curb and gutter.
▪ Alternative 2: Urban Reconstruction (with no parking): Full road reconstruction with
one 12 foot driving lane in each direction, a two foot curb reaction distance, and concrete
curb and gutter.
▪ Alternative 3: Rural Reconstruction: Full road reconstruction with one 12 foot driving
lane in each direction and 6 foot paved shoulders (no additional curb and gutter).
▪ Alternative 4: Rural Reconditioning (bituminous reclaim): This alternative consists of
reclaiming the existing 24 foot wide bituminous roadway and reclaiming the 8 foot wide
shoulders. The new street and shoulder widths would be replaced to match the existing
section (no significant subgrade correction).
▪ Alternative 5: Bituminous Reclaim (Non-State Aid standard): This alternative consists
of removing Old Snelling Avenue from the State Aid system and performing an
improvement to the roadway segment that does not meet State Aid standards, such as
removing the existing paved shoulders.
Feasibility Report Page 3
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
The Preliminary Scoping Document did not provide a specific recommendation regarding
the preferred alternative. Snelling Avenue North was originally constructed by MnDOT and
turned back to the City in approximately 1995. The document includes the following
statement: “It should be noted that City staff was not able to receive Minnesota Department
of Transportation (Mn/DOT) records for the original construction or maintenance on Old
Snelling Avenue. Since the soil borings were obtained within the roadway shoulder areas,
City staff believes there possibly might be a concrete base underlying the existing asphalt
surface.”
2012 Feasibility Report, Old Snelling Avenue Improvements
The City prepared a Feasibility Report in March 2012 for proposed improvements along
Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to Trunk Highway 51. This report focused on
Alternative 4 from the Preliminary Scoping Document, which includes reclaiming and
repaving Old Snelling Avenue to maintain the existing width and lane configuration and no
additional curb and gutter.
The report describes potential construction of a pedestrian trail extension along Snelling
Avenue North as identified in the City’s Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. Preliminary
cost estimates from a 2008 trail study are sited in the report, with a recommendation to
construct an 8-foot wide trail along the west side of Old Snelling Road from County Road E
to TH 51. However, it appears that trail construction costs were not included in the project
cost estimates within the 2012 Feasibility Report.
The 2012 Feasibility Report was completed prior to the current proposal to construct
intersection improvements at the intersection of County Road E and Snelling Avenue North
and does not include costs for intersection improvements. In addition, recent utility
inspections have identified the need to repair or replace deteriorated storm sewer and sanitary
sewer within the project area, which are not included in the 2012 Report.
Intersection Control Evaluation, County Road E at Old Snelling Avenue (2018)
The City and County jointly participated in the preparation of an Intersection Control
Evaluation (ICE) study in October 2018 for the intersection of County Road E and Snelling
Avenue North. A copy is provided in Appendix B. This report includes an evaluation of
traffic control, intersection lane geometry, and operations using projected traffic volumes.
The County Road E corridor is projected to see an increase in traffic over the coming years.
Two alternatives for intersection modifications were evaluated, including the construction of
a traffic signal and the construction of a single-lane roundabout. Both the traffic signal and
roundabout alternatives are believed to accommodate future growth in the area, but the study
concluded that the roundabout is believed to provide a safer alternative than the current all-
way stop control. Intersection volumes do not meet traffic signal warrants.
Feasibility Report Page 4
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 Land Use
Properties located within Area 1 (Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to Highway
51) are within the R-1 Single Family Residential District based on the City’s Zoning Map.
Two types of properties border the proposed improvements consisting of single family
residential properties and two tax-exempt properties located at 3588 Ridgewood Road (City)
and 1357 Cummings Lane (State Trust).
Properties within Area 2 (Snelling Avenue N and County Road E Intersection) are located in
the R-1 Single Family Residential District, with one parcel in the northeast quadrant of the
intersection that is zoned within the NB-Neighborhood Business District, generally referred
to as the Lindey’s Steakhouse property. The second parcel at 1525 Lake Johanna Boulevard
is a R-1 single family residential home with frontage and driveway access within the
proposed construction limits of the potential intersection improvements.
2.2 Streets
Street improvements considered within the study are organized into two potential
improvement areas as described below.
AREA 1 – Snelling Avenue North
Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to Trunk Highway 51 is an undivided roadway
that is approximately 4,300 feet long (0.81 mile) and lies within a 200 foot right-of-way. The
northerly 330 feet immediately south of County Road E is an urban section roadway with
curb and gutter, two through lanes, one northbound left turn lane and shoulders having an
approximate total street width of 44-feet. The remaining corridor is a rural road section
having 12 foot driving lanes in each direction and 8 foot paved shoulders, for a total width
of 40 feet.
Snelling Avenue North was previously a state highway, which was turned back to the City
in the mid-1990s. Soil borings conducted in 2019 indicate fill material varying in depth from
1.5 feet to 11.5 feet and generally classified as clayey sand. Underlying the fill is glacial till
consisting of clayey sand and sandy lean clay. The top bituminous pavement thickness
ranges from 3-inches to 11-inches thick, with 6-inches to 24-inches of aggregate base above
a second lower layer of bituminous pavement along the southern portion of the corridor. A
copy of the geotechnical report and soil boring logs are provided in Appendix C.
Pavement conditions are highly deteriorated with a current Pavement Condition Rating of 15
out of 100. A majority of the pavement is aging and exhibiting characteristics of distress,
such as potholes, rutting, and severe cracking throughout much of the corridor. The demand
for frequent pavement patching has become excessive and it is no longer cost effective to
maintain the existing pavement though preservation or resurfacing improvements.
Feasibility Report Page 5
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
A 140- foot long segment of Snelling Avenue North located approximately 400 feet north of
Highway 51 was reconstructed in 2018 during replacement of the bridge that conveys
drainage from Lake Josephine to Lake Johanna.
Snelling Avenue North serves as a collector roadway and is currently designated as a
Municipal State Aid street (MSAS 111). Average daily traffic data indicates a volume of
1600 vehicles per day in 2017, the most recent data available from MnDOT. The roadway
is posted at 40 miles per hour in both the northbound and southbound directions.
Cummings Lane is a rural section residential street extending approximately 575 feet east
from Snelling Avenue North and lies within a 60 foot wide right-of-way. The existing
bituminous pavement rating is below 20, with significant block cracking and segments
having complete pavement failure. Pavement thickness was found to be only 2 to 3 inches
in various locations. Routine patching and pavement resurfacing are no longer cost effective
due to the extent of pavement deterioration. The storm sewer catch basin located at the east
end of the street collects surface drainage and discharges into the right -of-way for Trunk
Highway 51. This catch basin structure and corrugated metal outlet pipe are deteriorated
based on inspections conducted in 2020.
Bussard Court is an urban section residential street serving 15 residential properties to the
west of Snelling Avenue North. This street is approaching the end of service life and should
be considered for reconstruction within the next five years. However, the first 100-feet
directly west of Snelling Avenue is highly deteriorated due to unstable subgrade conditions.
The Public Works department has made several attempts to complete small repairs, but the
pavement continues to fail and has become difficult to maintain in the winter and spring.
Subgrade corrections are needed to stabilize the pavement.
Area 2 – Intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E
The intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E is currently controlled by an
all-way stop condition. The east leg of the intersection consists of one eastbound and
westbound travel lane with a continuous left turn lane and an average daily traffic (ADT)
volume of 10,000 vehicles per day (2017). The north leg of the intersection consists of one
northbound and southbound travel lane with a dedicated southbound left turn lane and an
average daily traffic volume of 6,600 vehicles per day (2019). The west leg of the
intersection consists of one eastbound and westbound travel lane with an eastbound left turn
lane and an average daily traffic volume of 5,100 vehicles per day (2019). The south leg is
described above.
The intersection is contained within a large swath of right of way stemming from the previous
1950’s intersection configuration as a state highway. The intersection has been in its current
configuration since 1974. Minor improvements were completed along the north and east
legs of the intersection in 2018 during construction of an adjacent pedestrian trail.
Pavement conditions at the intersection are showing signs of distress, with generally lower
pavement condition ratings for the south leg of the intersection as described above.
Intersection functionality and crash history are described below.
Feasibility Report Page 6
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
2.3 Intersection Conditions
In April 2018, the City Council entered into a cooperative agreement with Ramsey County
to conduct a traffic study and Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) for the intersection of
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E. The ICE study was completed in November
2018. A copy of the report is provided in Appendix B.
The purpose of the ICE report was to evaluate the existing (2018) and future (2038) traffic
control layout for the intersection of County Road E and Snelling Avenue North and
recommend potential improvements. The report identifies two key points related to the
existing intersection function.
1. The County Road E corridor is projected to see an increase in traffic over the coming
years with the Bethel University Expansion.
2. MnDOT’s Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT) database indicates there have been
9 crashes at the intersection between January 2013 and December 2015. Existing crash
patterns show that the intersection experiences an extremely high rate of 0.68 crashes
per million entering vehicles compared to the average rate of 0.34 for all-way stop
intersections. The crash rate is higher than the critical rate of 0.65 and the severity rate
of 0.76 is higher than the Statewide average severity rate of 0.5.
The intersection was simulated with a traffic model for both the AM and PM peak traffic
hours using existing (2018) traffic volume data as described in the ICE report. The traffic
operations analysis showed that the intersection currently operates at an acceptable Level of
Service (LOS) “A” during the AM peak hour and LOS “B” during the PM peak hour. The
report concluded “The analysis results indicate there are not major queuing issues currently
at the intersection. However, based on field observation during the peak hours, the
intersection seems to perform far poorer tha[n] what the analysis is indicating.”
The study then continued with further analysis of the intersection, substituting traffic volume
data from the 2013 Bethel University Expansion Traffic Study in lieu of existing 2018 traffic
volume data. This alternative analysis assumed traffic volumes of approximately 30 percent
more than measured volumes and identified that the intersection is forecasted to fail during
the PM peak hour under current conditions. The study further predicted that the intersection
would continue to operate poorly during the PM peak hour under projected increases in
traffic volume in the year 2038.
The installation of traffic signals are guided by a series of standards, or warrants, that define
the minimum conditions under which installing a traffic signal could be justified. The ICE
report reviewed existing traffic characteristics and determined that traffic signal warrants are
not currently met for the intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E.
Installation of a signal would not be justified at this time.
The traffic study further reviewed the intersection to determine if warrants are met for
installation of a single lane roundabout. Although no formal traffic warrants for roundabouts
currently exist, the MnDOT Intersection Control Evaluation Manual states that if a traffic
signal or an all-way stop warrant is met, a roundabout should also be considered as a traffic
control device. All-way stop warrants are currently met for this intersection, therefore the
Feasibility Report Page 7
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
ICE report concluded that installation of a roundabout is considered to be justified and
recommended at the intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E.
The Arden Hills City Council reviewed and discussed the above information during a work
session on September 21, 2020. Traffic conditions at this intersection have recently changed
as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and construction along the I-35W North MnPass
Project. The City Council directed staff to conduct further study of the intersection as
described in Section 3 of this report.
2.4 Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer within the study area consists of vitrified clay pipe (VCP),
polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC), and segments with cured in place liner as summarized on the
following Table 1. Sanitary sewers were inspected by the City Public Works Department in
2019 using video televising equipment and conditions were documented as shown in the
right column on the table. Condition grades are based on a scale of 1 (good) to 5 (significant
defects). Pipe sections with condition grades between 3 and 5 should generally be
considered for potential rehabilitation or replacement as described in Section 3. A map
showing the location of the references sewer segments is provided in Appendix D.
Table 1: Summary of Existing Sanitary Sewer Conditions
Segment
Project
Area
Pipe
Material
Pipe
Diameter
Year
Installed
CIPP
Lining
Overall
Condition of
Main Pipe
MH 3-031 to 3-030 2 PVC 8-inch 1983 No 3
MH 3-030 to 3-032 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 3
MH 3-033 to 3-032 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 3
MH 3-033 to 3-034 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 5
MH 3-035 to 3-034 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 3
MH 3-038 to 3-037 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 5
MH 3-037 to 3-036 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 5
MN 3-036 to 3-034 2 VCP 8-inch 1960 No 5
MN 3-043 to 3-042 2 PVC 8-inch 1983 No 2
MH 3-042 to 3-033 2 PVC 8-inch 1983 No 2
MN 8-160 to 8-159 1 VCP 10-Inch 1960 Yes 2
MH 8-159 to 8-158 1 VCP 10-Inch 1960 Yes 2
MH 8-161 to 8-158 1 VCP 8-inch 1960 Yes 2
MH 8-158 to 8-157 1 VCP/CIP 10-inch 1960 No 4
MH 8-016 to 8-015 1 VCP 8-inch 1965 Yes 2
Feasibility Report Page 8
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
2.5 Water Main
The existing water distribution mains within the study area consists of cast iron pipe (CIP)
and ductile iron pipe (DIP) as summarized on the following Table 2. A review of the City’s
water main break historical records did not identify past water main pipe break or leak
repairs. The water main extending between Lametti Lane and Bussard Court is considered
to have an elevated risk for pipe breaks due to the configuration of the water system as further
described in Section 3.
Water main was replaced and increased to a 12-inch diameter pipe along Snelling Avenue to
the north of County Road E in 2018, but the project did not extend the new, larger diameter
water main to the 12-inch diameter main along County Road E. A 150-ft segment of 6-inch
diameter water main was not replaced. Replacement of this 150-ft segment is an important
improvement to eventually provide higher water supply conveyance capacity to the northern
portion of the city.
2.6 Drainage
Snelling Avenue North between Highway 51 and Arden Place is a rural section roadway with
minimal storm sewer. The majority of runoff is directed to ditches along the roadway, which
ultimately drain to ponds and wetlands within the Johanna subwatershed area.
Table 2: Summary of Existing Water Main
Street From To
Project
Area
Pipe
Material
Pipe
Diameter
Year
Installed
County Rd E 260' East of Snelling Ridgewood 2 12-inch DIP 1968
Snelling County Road E 150' North of CR E 2 6-inch DIP 1982
Snelling Arden Place 470' N of Arden Pl 1 6-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Arden PL Crossing Arden PL Crossing 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Skiles Ln Lametti Ln 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Glenarden Crossing Glenarden
Crossing 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Lametti Ln Bussard Ct 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Cummings Crossing Cummings
Crossing 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Bussard Ct Bridge Crossing 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Snelling Bridge Crossing Bridge Crossing 1 8-inch DIP 2018
Snelling Bridge Crossing South Termini 1 8-inch CIP 1969
Feasibility Report Page 9
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
The segment of Snelling Avenue located north of Arden Place drains to a storm sewer system
within the intersection at County Road E. From this intersection, runoff is conveyed north
through 18-inch and 21-inch diameter storm sewer pipes that discharges into a wetland
located in the southwest quadrant of Snelling Avenue North and the railroad crossing (Public
Waters #194W), within the Valentine subwatershed area. Ramsey County has conducted a
CCTV inspection of this 18-inch and 21-inch storm sewer and documented that a majority
of pipe segments are in poor to failing condition with cracks, voids and multiple joint failures.
The existing storm sewer system is shown in Appendix D.
The two project areas are not identified within the Flood Hazard Areas Map contained within
the City’s Surface Water Plan, with the exception of the Lake Josephine outlet channel
crossing at the new Snelling Avenue bridge structure near the south end of the project
corridor.
A wetland delineation review was conducted with Rice Creek Watershed District during
preparation of this feasibility report. A copy of the wetland boundary determination and
Wetland Conservation Act decision for the project corridor is provided in Appendix E.
Minor additional wetland delineation work may be required during the design process based
on the extent of storm sewer replacement north of the Snelling Avenue and County Road E
intersection for Public Waters #194W noted above.
2.7 Environmental Conditions
During the geotechnical investigation process for this feasibility study, the geotechnical firm
reported “Apparent Hydrocarbon Odors” at 11 of the 15 soil boring locations. In response
to this information, the City hired a consultant to conduct an environmental investigation to
assist with identification of potential contaminants within the project area. The scope of
work for the environmental investigation included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) and a field investigation to evaluate the current subsurface soil, groundwater and soil
vapor conditions along the project corridor.
The investigation identified elevated contamination levels at two locations along the corridor
designated as environmental borings EB-3 and EB-8. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAH) and diesel range organics (DRO) impacted soil above the MPCA reuse criteria was
identified at these two locations. Benzo(a)pyrene was detected in soil samples at EB-3 and
EB-8 above the Tier II Industrial and Tier 1 Residential soil reference values criteria. DRO
also exceeded the MPCA criteria for unregulated full, which will require disposal of
excavated regulated fill at an MPCA-permitted landfill during construction.
Following completion of the field investigation, the City authorized the environmental
consultant to prepare a Response Action Plan, a Construction Contingency Plan and a MPCA
Brownfields enrollment application for the project. A copy of the Phase I ESA, Field
Investigation Report and Response Action Plan are provided in Appendix F.
Feasibility Report Page 10
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
2.8 Private Utilities
Private utility companies having infrastructure within the study area will be notified early
during the project design phase and requested to coordinate any necessary repairs or
replacements at their cost. Private utility infrastructure located in the study area includes
Comcast (Cable), CenturyLink (Telephone), and Xcel Energy (Electric/Gas). The natural
gas above-ground infrastructure in the southwest quadrant of Snelling Avenue and County
Road E will require significant coordination as part of the design process for future
intersection improvements.
Feasibility Report Page 11
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
3. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
3.1 Street Improvements: Area 1 – Snelling Avenue North
This study included an investigation of design alternatives for the roadway and potential
addition of a pedestrian trail along Snelling Avenue North. While multiple roadway and trail
layout alternatives were initially considered as part of the study, viable design options are
governed by specific design requirements, which include the following standards.
• Minnesota Rules 8820.9920: Minimum Design Standards; Rural and Suburban
undivided; New or Reconstruction Projects
• Minnesota Rules 8820.9926: Minimum Design Standards; Rural and Suburban
undivided; Reconditioning Projects
• Minnesota Rules 8820.9936: Minimum Design Standards; Urban; New or
Reconstruction Projects
• Minnesota Rules 8820.9995: Minimum Off-Road and Shared Use Path Standards
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Design Standards
It is important to note that some segments of the roadway corridor within Area 1 have
extensive vertical relief with steep slopes extending east and west from the edge of pavement.
Road improvements beyond full depth reclamation work is considered “reconstruction” by
MnDOT and triggers MN Rules 8820.9920 design requirements. Maximum in-slope grades
may be difficult to achieve and would require substantial clearing of trees and placement of
fill to widen the roadway platform in some areas, particularly along the roadway between
Skiles Lane and Lametti Lane. While there is sufficient right of way available along the
corridor, separation of the trail alignment from the edge of the roadway pavement would also
require substantial tree clearing and fill placement within areas having steep side slopes in
order to comply with ADA requirements for maximum trail grades.
Due to the standards and challenges mentioned above, two primary alternatives were
investigated as part of this study.
Alternative 1 - Full Reconstruction Plus Trail: This alternative includes the full depth
reconstruction of the roadway and the addition of an 8 to 10 foot wide multiuse
pedestrian/bicycle trail extending from County Road E to Highway 51. The potential trail
was considered based on the City’s 2040 comprehensive plan which identifies a proposed
regional bicycle transportation network trail extending along Snelling Avenue North from
Hamline Avenue at Highway 51 to Lake Valentine Road.
A schematic layout of the proposed roadway and trail improvements for Alternative 1 is
provided in Appendix G. The proposed road section and trail alignment were identified due
to several terrain challenges along the corridor as noted above. While the road is located in
a wide right of way, there are sections of steep grades along several sections, with side slopes
adjacent to the road in excess of 1:3 and grade differentials of 25 feet or more at certain
locations, in addition to delineated wetland boundaries along the corridor.
Feasibility Report Page 12
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
Alternative 1 proposes to narrow the roadway from 40 feet to a width of 28 to 34 feet within
the center section, install curb and storm sewer, and placement of the trail alignment directly
adjacent to the west curb line in an attempt to minimize substantial tree removal, minimize
large volumes of cut and fill grading, and avoid impacts to delineated wetlands. A similar
trail alignment was used along Snelling Avenue to the north of County Road E.
The advantages of Alternate 1 include completion of a segment of regional trail and
providing a dedicated facility for pedestrian and bicycles along the road corridor currently
posted at 40 mph. Pedestrians currently walk along the 8 -foot wide paved shoulder. The
disadvantages of Alternate 1 include a substantial increase in project costs, increased scope
and construction timeline for installation of curb and storm sewer, increased risk of
encountering areas of soil contamination during storm sewer installation, and use of limited
city funds compared to higher priority trail segments to the north of County Road E.
Alternative 2 - FDR Pavement Replacement (no trail): This alternative consists of
reclaiming the existing surface pavement by milling the bituminous pavement material and
blending it with the upper portion of the underlying aggregate base, commonly referred to as
full depth reclamation (FDR). Approximately 4-inches of reclaimed material would then be
removed to maintain the existing vertical profile of the road, and a new 4-inch thick
bituminous pavement section would be placed to the existing 40-feet road width, including
two 12-foot travel lines and two 8-foot wide paved shoulders. Edge line pavement markings
would be installed to delineate the pavement shoulders.
A schematic layout of the proposed roadway and trail improvements for Alternative 2 is
provided in Appendix H. The advantages of Alternate 2 include a shorter construction
timeline, lower project costs, focus of limited capital funds for trail segments north of County
Road E, and reduced risk of encountering contaminated soil conditions. The disadvantages
of Alternative 2 would include maintaining the current condition where bicyclists and
pedestrians continue to use the 8-ft wide paved shoulders without the benefit of a dedicated
multiuse trail facility south of County Road E.
Council Consideration: The City Council reviewed the two roadway alternatives described
above during two work sessions on July 20, 2020 and December 21, 2020. The Council
discussed the cost differential between the two alternatives in relation to the City’s limited
availability of capital improvement funds. The Council also discussed the higher priority
currently placed on recreational trail segments along Snelling Avenue North from County
Road E2 to Lake Valentine Road and the connection to Mounds View High School. While
not ideal, the roadway south of County Road E does have 8-foot wide shoulders to provide
some accommodation for pedestrians and bicyclist.
Feasibility Report Page 13
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
Based on these work session discussions, the City Council requested staff to consider
additional measures that could be incorporated into the design for Alternative 2 to provide
additional safety measures for pedestrians using the west shoulder area. The following six
strategies should be further developed during the design process.
A. Lane and Shoulder Configuration: In an effort to provide additional pedestrian space
along the west side of the roadway, while maintaining the existing 40-ft total road width,
the following road section is recommended for consideration during the design under
Alternate No. 2: 8-ft wide paved east shoulder, 11-ft wide northbound lane, 11-ft wide
southbound lane, and 10-ft wide paved west shoulder. A reduction of the east shoulder
to 6-ft wide and additional widening of the west shoulder could be considered during the
design process, but good engineering judgement should be used when considering a
reduction of the east shoulder width between Skiles Lane and Lametti Lane due to the
vertical relief and steeper side slopes along the roadway.
B. Pavement Markings: Due to pedestrian use of the paved shoulder areas and the steep
terrain along portions of the roadway, the proposed design for Alternate 2 includes the
placement of White Edge Line Pavement Markings along the length of the roadway
pursuant to section 3B.6 of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,
including the option for “wide” solid edge line markings. Edge line markings would
assist in minimizing unnecessary driving on paved shoulders.
C. No Parking Designation: Parking restrictions along the west side of Snelling Avenue
North should be considered to minimize the occurrence of parked vehicles that would
require bicyclists and pedestrians to shift out of the shoulder and into the travel lane. The
cost of No Parking sign installation is included in the project cost estimate.
D. Shoulder Rumble Strips: Due to steeper in-slope grades along portions of the corridor
and the need to minimize vehicle lane departures, the project design should include
consideration of rectangular corrugated or sinusoidal shoulder rumble strips in
accordance with MnDOT Technical Memorandum No. 17-08-T-02. Special attention
should be given to the lateral placement and width of shoulder rumble strips during final
design to minimize noise concerns. The cost of rumble strip installation is included in
the project cost estimate for Alternative 2.
E. Speed Limit Considerations: A traffic engineering study should be conducted along the
corridor during the project design process to determine if a lower speed limit may be
justified due to design constraints and limited sight distances for driveways and street
intersections. It is possible that the results of the study could recommend a reduction in
the current posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour.
F. Speed Display Signs: The placement of speed display signs along the portion of Snelling
Avenue/Old Highway 10 north of I-694 have shown some effectiveness with improving
compliance with posted speed limits. While the installation of speed display signs should
be limited to locations meeting specific criteria, this section of Snelling Avenue North is
Feasibility Report Page 14
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
a longer, uninterrupted roadway that tends to generate higher vehicle speeds compared
to most other local roadways within the community. The design process should closely
consider the installation of these signs. The cost of two permanently mounted speed
display signs is included in the cost estimate for Alternative 2.
3.2 Street Improvements: Area 2 – Intersection of Snelling Ave and County Road E
Section 2.3 provides a summary of the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) study
previously conducted for the intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E. The
ICE report provides a review of alternatives considered for the intersection and
recommended construction of a single lane roundabout. A copy of the ICE report is provided
in Appendix B.
Two schematic layouts were prepared for the proposed roundabout intersection
improvements as provided in Appendix I. While both layouts are similar, there is variation
in the intersection alignment to illustrate the ability to minimize potential right of way
acquisition and the need to relocate overhead power and natural gas utilities near the
intersection. For the purposes of this feasibility report, both layouts are assumed to have the
same estimated costs as provided in Section 5.
Council Consideration: The City Council reviewed the ICE report and the proposed single
lane roundabout intersection improvements during a work session on September 21, 2020.
The Council discussed the significant changes in traffic volumes at the intersection of
Snelling Avenue and County Road E due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Council also
discussed the potential changes to traffic volume from Bethel University, which is one of the
primary trip generators for this intersection, and concerns expressed during the public open
house meeting in October 2019 regarding the proposed roundabout. The consensus of the
City Council was to separate the potential intersection improvements into an independent
project from the Area 1 roadway improvements south of County Road E. The Council further
directed staff to work with Ramsey County to conduct additional traffic study of the
intersection after traffic patterns return to more stable condition in 2021 or 2022.
If the City proceeds with Alternative 2 for Snelling Avenue North (no trail), this study
recommends that an 8-ft wide paved pedestrian trail is eventually constructed along the west
side of Snelling Avenue between County Road E and Arden Place to provide separation of
vehicle and pedestrian traffic where the shoulder width narrows within the approach to the
County Road E intersection.
3.3 Street Improvements: Cummings Lane and Bussard Court
As mentioned in Section 2, Cummings Lane and the east 100-feet of Bussard Court are highly
deteriorated and can no longer be cost-effectively maintained. Proposed improvements for
Cummings Lane consist of reclaiming the existing pavement, shaping the generated
aggregate material to raise the center crown to improve pavement drainage and repaving the
roadway with 4-inches of bituminous pavement. The installation of curb and gutter is not
proposed along Cummings Lane. Improvements also include replacement of the storm sewer
Feasibility Report Page 15
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
structure at the low point of the road and the culvert extending into the drainage ditch along
Trunk Highway 51.
Proposed street improvements for the 100-foot section of Bussard Court include removal of
the pavement, reconstruction of the upper two feet of subgrade with granular and aggregate
base, replacement of damaged curb and placement of 4-inches of new bituminous pavement.
3.4 Utility Improvements: Area 1 – Snelling Ave N south of County Road E
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer along Snelling Avenue is located approximately 30 feet or more to the east
and west of the roadway pavement. The segment between Arden Place and Skiles Lane was
previously improved with a CIPP liner. Based on the recent condition evaluation
summarized in Section 2, the recommended sanitary sewer improvements are limited to
replacement of the 8-inch diameter crossing under Snelling Avenue at Skiles Lane east as
shown in Appendix D. This segment of sewer was originally constructed with a combination
of VCP and CIP pipe materials, which is believed to have been done as an alternative to
installing a steel casing pipe within the former State highway. The CIP section of pipe is in
a highly deteriorated condition.
Water Main
Under the Alternative 1 scenario (trail), water main along Snelling Avenue North would be
replaced with new ductile iron or PVC pipe due to the significant excavation and disturbance
required for construction of the trail and associated storm sewer system.
Under the Alternative 2 scenario (no trail), a majority of existing water main south of County
Road E is proposed to remain in-place. These segments of water main do not have a history
of water main breaks based on City records. Removal and replacement of water main
between Lametti Lane and Bussard Court is recommended to improve reliability of the water
supply feed from Cummings Lane, particularly for Bussard Court, which is supplied from
only one direction. A water main break between Bussard and Cummings Lane would disrupt
water service to 19 or more homes. The locations of water main improvements are indicated
in Appendix D.
Drainage
Snelling Avenue south of Arden Place is predominately a rural section roadway with little
storm sewer within the project area. Culverts are located under the adjacent streets and
driveways connecting to Snelling Avenue.
The addition of a pedestrian trail as described in Alternate 1 would require the installation of
a significant amount of curb and storm sewer to allow the trail to be located directly adjacent
to the road surface and minimize the amount of fill embankment within wetlands and steep
slope areas.
Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) requirements as outlined in Rule C apply to public
linear roadway projects. The proposed roadway improvements under Alternate 1, including
Feasibility Report Page 16
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
a new pedestrian trail, would likely require the addition of Best Management Practices
(BMPs) such as bio-filtration, stormwater detention for discharge rate management, and
inline sediment/grit chambers. Section 5 includes a general cost estimate for these BMP
items.
Proposed roadway improvements for Alternative 2 (no addition of pedestrian trail) would
not create a significant amount of new impervious surface or concentrate runoff into storm
sewer point discharges. Rule C requirements do not currently apply to mill, reclamation and
overlay pavement projects. Section 5 does not include the additional costs for permanent
BMPs for Alternative 2. Temporary erosion and sediment control devices will be utilized
during construction in accordance with applicable NPDES permit and RCWD Rule D
requirements.
3.5 Utility Improvements: Area 2 – Intersection of Snelling Ave and County Road E
Sanitary Sewer
Based on the recent condition evaluation described in Section 2, the recommended sanitary
sewer improvements include installation of 250 feet of cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) sewer
lining between MH 3-035 and 3-034 as well as between MH 3-033 and 3-034 as shown in
Appendix D. Sanitary sewer pipe between MH 3-034 and 3-038 is proposed to be removed
and replaced due to the highly deteriorated condition of the pipe.
Water Main
Recommended water main improvements within Area 2 include replacement of 620 feet of
12-inch diameter water main within the intersection and replacement of an additional 150
feet of 6-inch diameter water main extending north with 12-inch water main to complete the
water main capacity improvements along Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to
County Road E2.
Drainage
Construction of a roundabout intersection improvement will require replacement of existing
storm sewer to reconfigure storm sewer inlets and conveyance pipes based on the geometric
design of the roundabout. Recommended improvements also include rehabilitation of
approximately 600 feet of existing storm sewer by installation of cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP)
lining as shown in Appendix D. The CIPP installation is recommended as a cost effective
method of repairing the pipe segments located outside of the intersection by avoiding
excavation required to remove and replace the pipes.
Storm water drainage design will need to meet Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)
requirements as outlined in Rule C. The project design will evaluate specific Best
Management Practices (BMPs) such as bio-filtration and inline sediment/grit chambers
placed before discharging into the downstream storm sewer system. Section 5 includes a
general cost estimate for these BMP items. Temporary erosion and sediment control devices
will be utilized during construction in accordance with applicable NPDES permit and RCWD
Rule D requirements.
Feasibility Report Page 17
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
Private Utilities
Construction of a single lane roundabout as shown in Appendix I is anticipated to require
relocation of overhead power lines along the west side of Snelling Avenue and may require
modification to the natural gas manifold assembly located in the southwest quadrant of the
intersection. Early and frequent coordination with Xcel Energy will be necessary during the
design process.
3.6 Easements
Street improvements south of County Road E as proposed within this report are anticipated
to occur within the existing road right-of-way. Public utility improvements are planned to
occur within the right-of-way or currently dedicated drainage and utility easements. The
need for permanent easement acquisition south of County Road E is not expected to construct
the project as proposed.
Construction of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of County Road E and Snelling
Avenue North may require temporary and permanent easement acquisition in the southwest
quadrant of the intersection from the residential property at 3586 Ridgewood Road and
potentially the northeast quadrant at 3610 Snelling Avenue North. The intersection design
described in Section 3.4 will involve encroachments into the excess right -of-way green space
commonly referred to as Lindey’s Park in the southeast corner of the intersection. A portion
of this green space will also be needed for construction of a stormwater BMP to fulfill the
regulatory requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District.
3.7 Permits/Approvals
The anticipated permits required for the proposed project are as follows:
▪ Minnesota Department of Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Extension of Water Main
▪ Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Right-of-Way Permit
▪ Rice Creek Watershed District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rule C Erosion Control, Linear Rule D
▪ Minnesota Pollution Control Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . Erosion and Stormwater Permit
▪ Minnesota Dept of Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Right-of-Way and Drainage Permit
3.8 Construction Access and Staging
A traffic control and construction staging plan would be developed during preparation of
construction plans to coordinate property access and traffic safety within the project area.
The contractor will be responsible for providing access to all properties at th e end of each
work day, with the exception of concrete curing times during curb installation. Additional
information regarding staging and property access would be provided to residents prior to
and during the construction phase of the project.
Feasibility Report Page 18
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
A public open house meeting was conducted on October 17, 2019 at Arden Hills City Hall to
present information on the proposed improvements to Snelling Avenue North, potential
pedestrian trail improvements, and potential intersection improvements at County Road E. An
invitation letter was mailed to 240 properties near the project corridor for the open house
meeting. The meeting was attended by approximately 50 to 60 people.
The open house included stations where residents could review schematic drawings of the
proposed road improvements, pedestrian trail option and layout of the potential roundabout
intersection improvements. Residents asked questions of staff and provide comments regarding
the project. The most common comments included the following items.
▪ Roadway pavement is highly deteriorated and needs to be improved.
▪ Concerns regarding speeding traffic and a desire to lower the speed limit
▪ Concerns or objections to the proposed roundabout
▪ Concerns for pedestrian safety along the corridor
▪ Concerns with traffic stacking west of the traffic signal at County Road E and Highway
51 interchange.
City staff distributed comment cards during the meeting to allow residents to provide additional
written comments regarding the project. The City received 13 comment cards, one letter, and
follow-up emails, which are provided in Appendix J.
A subsequent letter was mailed to residents on November 4, 2019 notifying residents of the
planned change in delivery schedule from 2021 to 2022 due to Ramsey County changing the
construction schedule for Lexington Avenue from 2020 to 2021. A copy of this letter is included
in Appendix J. Ramsey County has subsequently changed the construction schedule again for
Lexington Avenue from 2021 to 2022.
Based on direction from the City Council regarding the results of this feasibility study, additional
information would be shared with residents through mailed letters, emails, social media and
informational updates on the City’s website.
Feasibility Report Page 19
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
5. ESTIMATED COST AND FUNDING
5.1 Opinion of Cost
A summary of the total project cost estimate for the project is provided in Table 4 below.
The estimates includes 37% in overhead costs as outlined in the City’s Assessment Policy.
Overhead costs account for engineering, legal, financing, contingency and administrative
costs associated with the project. Detailed cost estimates are provided in Appendix K.
Area 1: Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to Highwa y 51, including Bussard Ct
Area 2: Roundabout Intersection Improvements at Snelling Ave North and County Road E
Alternative 1: Reconstruction with addition of pedestrian trail
Alternative 2: Full depth reclamation with no trail construction, widened west shoulder
Alternative 2 Street Costs = $782,930 (street improv.) + $107,570 (safety modifications not assessed)
The opinion of total project costs is based on recent construction projects of similar character
and assumes the construction of proposed improvements will begin in 2022. Actual costs
will be determined through competitive bids following final design for the project.
Table 4 - Summary of Project Costs
AREA 1 AREA 2
Cummings
Lane
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Roundabout FDR
Improvement Estimated Cost Estimated Cost Estimated Cost Estimated Cost
Street Improvements $1,838,680 $890,500 $917,700 $65,130
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $58,420 $60,480 $125,740 $0
Water Main Improvements $440,260 $161,970 $158,230 $0
Storm Drainage Improvements $947,590 $44,200 $479,860 $20,280
TOTAL $3,284,950 $1,157,150 $1,681,530 $85,410
Feasibility Report Page 20
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
5.2 Project Funding
Proposed project funding sources are a combination of the City’s Permanent Improvement
Revolving (PIR) fund, utility funds, Ramsey County, Municipal State Aid, and special
assessments for street improvements as summarized in Table 5 below.
Area 1: Snelling Avenue North from County Road E to Highway 51, including Bussard Ct.
Area 2: Roundabout Intersection Improvements at Snelling Ave and County Road E
Alternative 1: Reconstruction with addition of pedestrian trail
Alternative 2: Full depth reclamation with no trail construction, widened west shoulder
Alternative 2 Street Costs = $782,930 (street improv.) + $107,570 (safety modifications not assessed)
Table 5 - Summary of Project Funding Sources
AREA 1 AREA 2
Cummings
Lane
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Roundabout
Funding Source
Funding
Amount
Funding
Amount
Funding
Amount
Funding
Amount
PIR Fund $1,716,530 $768,350 $0 $32,565
Special Assessments $122,150 $122,150 $18,860 $32,565
Municipal State Aid Funds $0 $0 $330,530 $0
Ramsey County $0 $0 $1,048,170 $0
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $58,420 $60,480 $125,740 $0
Water Main Improvements $440,260 $161,970 $158,230 $0
Storm Drainage Improvements $947,590 $44,200 $0 $20,280
TOTAL $3,284,950 $1,157,150 $1,681,530 $85,410
Feasibility Report Page 21
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
5.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Assessments for street improvement costs are proposed to be levied to benefiting properties
as outlined in Minnesota Statute 429 and the City of Arden Hills Assessment Policy. A
preliminary assessment map and detailed preliminary assessment roll is provided in
Appendix L.
Special assessments to benefiting properties along residential streets typically fund 50
percent of the surface improvements, including contingencies and overhead pursuant to Part
1 of the City’s Assessment Policy. The policy states that corner lots shall be assessed on the
street that is used for the mailing address. This provision is interpreted to limit assessments
for street improvements to the street segment abutting the mailing address frontage of the
property. This is an important provision given that only 24 properties are addressed on
Snelling Avenue North between County Road E and Highway 51. All other properties have
mailing addresses from adjacent side.
Given the non-standard lot configuration and limited number of eligible properties along the
Snelling Avenue corridor based on mailing addresses, assessments for Area 1 street
improvements on Snelling Avenue were calculated by dividing 50 percent of street costs
(under Alternate 2, no trail) by the total length of roadway improvement frontage to
determine a cost per foot. This unit cost per foot was then multiplied by the minimum lot
frontage for R1 zoned properties at 95 feet to arrive at a residential equivalent unit (REU)
assessment rate.
Part 1 of the City’s Assessment Policy further states that the assessable cost of an
improvement shall be defined as those costs that, in the opinion of the City Council, are
attributable to the need for service in the area served by the improvement. The potential
trail construction described in Alternate 1 and the proposed roundabout intersection
construction within Area 2 are considered regional improvements that serve numerous
properties outside of the project area and regional traffic traveling through the project
corridor. Therefore, the costs for these improvements are not included in the estimated REU
rate. The preliminary assessment rates for the parcels adjacent to the Area 2 intersection
improvements are calculated based on Area 1 standard street improvements as described
above.
Estimated assessment rates are provided below.
Street Improvements: Area 1 - Snelling Avenue, County Road E to Highway 51
Estimated Street Costs: ......................................................... $782,930
50% Estimated Street Costs: ................................................. $391,465
Total Street Length Frontage: .............................................. 8,220 feet
50% Cost per Foot: ................................................................... $47.62
R1 Zoned Minimum Frontage Width: ...................................... 95 feet
Assessment Rate: ...................................................................... $4,524
Feasibility Report Page 22
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
The Assessment Policy states that the assessment rate shall be computed on a per-lot unit
basis, with a lot unit being defined as a platted single-family residential lot or equivalent,
which, according to current Arden Hills Municipal Code cannot be further subdivided for R-
1 and R-2 residential use. Two assessable lots within the project have an area that is large
enough to subdivide into multiple R-1 or R-2 single family lots with a minimum lot area of
14,000 square-feet. 3263 Snelling Avenue North is listed as 3.38 acres on the Ramsey
County property records. Given the size, dimensions and terrain, this lot is assigned three
(3) REUs on the draft assessment roll. 3265 Snelling Avenue North is listed as 2.52 acres
on the Ramsey County property records. Given the size, dimensions and terrain, this lot is
assigned two (2) REUs on the draft assessment roll.
The Assessment Policy also states that the commercial equivalent assessment rate shall be
based on 70 percent of the total street reconstruction costs. The assessment rate for the
Neighborhood Business district property at 3610 Snelling Avenue North (Lindey’s
Steakhouse) would be 70/50 times the cost per foot calculated above, applied to the 215-ft
property frontage along Snelling Avenue North, or $14,335.
Assessment rates for proposed street improvements along Cummings Lane were calculated
based on the standard application of the Assessment Policy by calculating 50 percent of the
street improvements divided by the number of lots with mailing addresses on Cummings
Lane.
Street Improvements: Cummings Lane
Estimated Street Costs: ........................................................... $65,130
50% Estimated Street Costs: ................................................... $32,565
Number of Lots: ................................................................................. 8
50% Cost per Foot: ................................................................... $4,071
As stated above, a preliminary assessment map and detailed preliminary assessment roll is
provided in Appendix L.
Feasibility Report Page 23
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following project schedule is proposed for improvements to Snelling Avenue North from
County Road E to Trunk Highway 51.
City Council reviews Draft Feasibility Report ...................................... December 21, 2020
and Provides Direction Regarding Assessments
City Staff Sends Mailing and Provides Recorded ..................................... February 1, 2021
Presentation for 2nd Round of Public Engagement
City Council Accepts Feasibility Report ....................................................... April 12, 2021
and Orders Public Improvement Hearing
City Council Conducts Public Improvement Hearing .................................... May 24, 2021
And Orders Plans and Specifications
City Council Approves Plans and Specifications .......................................... January 2022
And Authorizes Ad for Bid
City Opens Bids and Computes Assessments .............................................. February 2022
City Council Accepts Bids and Orders ........................................................ February 2022
the Assessment Hearing
City Council Conducts Assessment Hearing ................................................... March 2022
And Awards the Construction Contract
Begin Construction ............................................................................................. May 2022
Complete Construction .............................................................................. November 2022
City Certifies Assessments to County ....................................................... November 2022
Record Plan Completion ..................................................................................... May 2023
Warranty Inspection .................................................................................. September 2025
(2 years Following Substantial Completion)
Feasibility Report Page 24
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of this report, the following street and utility improvements are
recommended for City Council consideration.
Street Improvements - Area 1
Recommended street and utility improvements for Snelling Avenue North from County Road E
to Highway 51 consists of pavement improvements as previously described as Alternative 2
within this report. The construction of a new pedestrian trail is not recommended at this time
due to the additional cost in relation to limited available capital funding and the Councils priority
to focus on trail construction north of County Road E to connect the City’s trail system to
Mounds View High School and eventually to the regional trail system at County Road 96.
Recommended improvements are summarized as follows.
▪ Full depth pavement reclamation and repaving the roadway to the existing section width from
County Road E to Highway 51 with widened west shoulder area and safety improvements as
outlined in Section 3.
▪ Reconstruction of Bussard Court from Snelling Avenue N to 100 feet west of Snelling
Avenue N to address failing pavement and subgrade deficiencies.
▪ Full depth pavement reclamation and repaving of Cummings Lane from Snelling Avenue to
east terminus.
▪ Replacement of water main between Lametti Lane and Bussard Court to improve reliability
of the water supply feed south of Cummings Lane.
▪ Replacement of the 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer crossing at Skiles Lane due to
deteriorated pipe conditions.
Intersection and Utility Improvements – Area 2
Intersection improvements at Snelling Avenue North and County Road E are not recommended
to proceed to construction until completion of further investigation of projected traffic volume
growth for Bethel University and the surrounding roadway system. Ramsey County Public
Works representatives have indicated a willingness to conduct additional study of the
intersection and reschedule the intersection improvements within their Transportation
Improvement Program to the year 2023. During the interim planning period, City and County
staff should work collaboratively to address the following issues.
▪ Sanitary sewer repairs within the northeast quadrant of the intersection as described in
Section 3.
▪ Pipe lining and repairs to storm sewer located to the north and east of the intersection as
described in Section 3.
▪ Coordination of future intersection construction schedule with the proposed improvements
along Lexington Avenue between County Road E and I-694.
The total estimated cost for the proposed improvements to Snelling Avenue North as
recommended above is $1,242,600. Proposed funding for the project can be provided through a
combination of special assessments and City funds as outlined in Section 5 of this report.
Feasibility Report Page 25
Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
City Project Number PW 20-0100
8. FEASIBILITY, NECESSITY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS
The improvements recommended in this study are necessary to continue safe and reliable street
and utility services. The reconstruction of streets provides the City with a cost-effective means
of continuing the City’s street improvement efforts and ensuring an adequate means of
transportation for residents.
These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly
deteriorated street pavement within the City. Proposed water main improvements will provide
for an orderly replacement of water distribution system assets and reduce the risk of potential
water service disruptions for properties located along Lametti Lane and Bussard Court.
The recommended improvements constitute a project large enough to ensure a competitive
bidding environment, economy of scale, and are deemed to be cost-effective. Based on the
information contained within this report, the proposed improvements as described can be
considered necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint.
APPENDIX A
Project Area Map
APPENDIX B
Intersection Control Evaluation Report
INTERSECTION CONTROL
EVALUATION
COUNTY ROAD E
AT
OLD SNELLING AVENUE
Arden Hills, MN
October 8, 2018
Prepared for:
City of Arden Hills
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
S.A.P. NO. 187-111-002
S.A.P. NO. 062-615-039
S.A.P. NO. 062-676-004
S.A.P. NO. 062-749-002
INTERSECTION CONTROL
EVALUATION
COUNTY ROAD E AT
OLD SNELLING AVENUE
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
S.A.P. NO. 187-111-002
S.A.P. NO. 062-615-039
S.A.P. NO. 062-676-004
S.A.P. NO. 062-749-002
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Funding Category: ............................................................................................................. TBD
Estimated Letting Date:...................................................................................................... TBD
Work Identification: .................................................................. Intersection Control Evaluation
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
40945 DATE: 10/08/2018
Sean Delmore, P.E., PTOE License No.
REVIEWED: DATE: ___________
County Engineer – Ramsey County
REVIEWED: DATE: ___________
City Engineer – City of Arden Hills
APPROVED: DATE: ___________
MnDOT Metro District State Aid Engineer
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 1
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2
Description of Location .................................................................................................... 2
Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................... 4
Future Conditions ............................................................................................................ 5
Traffic Control Analysis ................................................................................................... 8
Evaluation Considerations ............................................................................................. 16
Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 17
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 17
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Project Location ............................................................................................. 3
Figure 2 – Existing Geometry .......................................................................................... 6
Figure 3 – Proposed Geometry ....................................................................................... 7
Figure 4 – Level of Service Guidelines .......................................................................... 12
Figure 5 – Proposed Roundabout Geometry ................................................................. 18
Figure 6 – Truck Turning Paths ..................................................................................... 19
Figure 7 – Fast Path Analysis ....................................................................................... 20
Figure 8 – Horizontal Sight Distance ............................................................................. 21
List of Tables
Table 1 – Existing Crash Rate Calculation ...................................................................... 5
Table 2 – Existing and Projected Crash Rates by Traffic Control Type ......................... 11
Table 3 – 2018 Existing Condition Operations Summary (SimTraffic) .......................... 13
Table 4 – 2018 (Study volumes) No Build Operations Summary (SimTraffic) ............... 14
Table 5 – 2018 (Study volumes) Build Operations Summary (RODEL) ........................ 14
Table 6 – 2038 No Build Operations Summary (SimTraffic) .......................................... 15
Table 7 – 2038 Build Operations Summary (RODEL) ................................................... 15
Appendices
APPENDIX A – Existing Turn Movement Counts
APPENDIX B – Crash Diagram
APPENDIX C – Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
APPENDIX D – All-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
APPENDIX E – SYNCHRO/RODEL Operations Results
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 2
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the traffic control and intersection lane geometry
necessary for the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue in the City of
Arden Hills in Ramsey County, Minnesota. This report will document the existing
conditions, operations and safety. It will also analyze existing and proposed intersection
geometry using projected traffic volumes.
Description of Location
County Road E is an undivided two-lane arterial roadway at the intersection with Old
Snelling Avenue. County Road E begins on the west along the Ramsey County border at
NE Stinson Parkway, is interrupted by Tony Schmidt Regional Park, and forms again at
the study intersection. County Road E then runs east and turns into Soo Street near I-
694. County Road E resumes east of Centerville Road and becomes TH 244 (Wildwood
Road) at the Washington County border. County Road E connects the Cities of New
Brighton, Arden Hills, and Shoreview, and to the east Vadnais Heights and Gem Lake in
Ramsey County. Josephine Road (CSAH 149), which forms the west leg of the study
intersection, is an arterial that runs around the north and west sides of Lake Johanna,
and eventually becomes Fairview Avenue at County Road D.
Old Snelling Avenue is an undivided two-lane collector roadway at the intersection with
County Road E. Old Snelling Avenue begins in the south at Snelling Avenue (TH 51) and
terminates to the north at County State-Aid Highway (CSAH) 96. This roadway provides
access primarily to residential streets and multiple schools in the City of Arden Hills. Old
Snelling Avenue is designated as CSAH 76 to the north of County Road E.
The project location within the context of the surrounding area is represented in Figure
1.
Figure 1
Existing Intersection
Location and
Surrounding Network
County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue
Intersection Control Evaluation
Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota
LEGEND
Existing Intersection Location
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 4
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Existing Conditions
The intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue is currently controlled by an
all-way stop application. A summary of the characteristics of County Road E and Old
Snelling Avenue at the intersection of study follows:
County Road E at the intersection of study:
▪ East-west Alignment
▪ West approach
o 30 mph speed limit
o 1 exclusive left-turn lane
o 1 shared thru/right-turn lane
o Existing ADT of 5,100 vehicles per day (vpd)
▪ East approach
o 35 mph speed limit
o 1 exclusive left-turn lane
o 1 thru lane
o 1 exclusive right-turn lane
o Existing ADT of 10,500 vpd
Old Snelling Avenue at the intersection of study:
▪ North-south Alignment
▪ North approach
o 45 mph speed limit
o 1 exclusive left-turn lane
o 1 shared thru/right-turn lane
o Existing ADT of 6,700 vpd
▪ South approach
o 40 mph speed limit
o 1 exclusive left-turn lane
o 1 shared thru/right-turn lane
o Existing ADT of 1,700 vpd
The existing intersection geometry is depicted in Figure 2.
Traffic turning movement counts at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling
Avenue were collected on February 7, 2018. The results of these traffic counts are
provided in Appendix A. Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are from
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) traffic volume map years 2013, 2014,
and 2016, and are included in Figure 2.
A summary of the 3-year (January 2013- December 2015) crash history at the intersection
of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue is provided in Table 1. MnDOT’s Crash
Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT) database indicates there have been 9 crashes at the
intersection between January 2013 and December 2015. Existing crash patterns show
that the intersection experiences an extremely high rate of 0.68 crashes per million
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 5
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
entering vehicles compared to the average rate of 0.34 for all-way stop intersections. The
crash rate is higher than the critical rate of 0.65 , and the severity rate of 0.76 is higher
than the Statewide average severity rate of 0.5. A Crash Diagram can be found in
Appendix B.
Table 1 – Existing Crash Rate Calculation
Future Conditions
The County Road E corridor is projected to see an increase in traffic over the coming
years with the Bethel University expansion. Two alternatives for intersection modifications
include the construction of a traffic signal and the construction of a single-lane roundabout
at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue . The traffic signal-
controlled intersection would likely maintain similar geometry as the existing condition,
but the single-lane roundabout would require modified geometry which i s shown in Figure
3.
Both the traffic signal and roundabout alternatives are believed to accommodate future
growth in the area, but the roundabout is believed to provide a safer alternative than the
traffic signal alternative and current all-way stop control.
Calculated Average**Critical***Calculated Average**
County Road E and Old Snelling
(2013-2015)9 12,000 0.68 0.34 0.65 0.76 0.50
Crash Rate*Number of
Crashes
Daily Entering
VehiclesLocation
***Critical crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles with 0.95 confidence level.
Severity Rate
**Average for all-way stop intersections using MnDOT 2015 green sheets.
*Intersection crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles.
County Road E and Old Snelling (2013-2015)
Figure 2
Existing Intersection Geometry
Existing AM/PM Turning
Movements
LEGEND
2 4 8 Lane Geometry
50 (75) AM (PM) Turning Movements
248 Turning Movement
s
2 4 8
15 (32)(7) 14i r w
(311) 103
,(19) 8
x
(11) 23(12) 23(60) 28
v39 (26)73 (81)242 (245)k
187 (148)
239 (345)
f
Lake Johanna Blvd
County Rd E
2018 Existing
RAMSEY
COUNTY
149
RAMSEY
COUNTY
15
RAMSEY
COUNTY
76
County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue
Intersection Control Evaluation
Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota
Figure 3
Roundabout Alternative
Forecasted 2018 & 2038
AM/PM Turning Movements
LEGEND
2 4 8 Lane Geometry
50 (75) AM (PM) Turning Movements
248 Turning Movement
Lake Johanna Blvd
County Rd E
2018 Study
v
(10) 15(15) 25(20) 15(125) 125
,(10) 10
(25) 25
15 (15)
x 2 4 8
215 (215)
i r w s
360 (360)
f
35 (30)95 (130)430 (380)k
2038
v
(11) 17(17) 28(22) 17(398) 138
,(28) 11
(99) 28
17 (50)
x 2 4 8
238 (260)
i r w s
398 (403)
f
39 (33)105 (144)475 (420)k
RAMSEY
COUNTY
149
RAMSEY
COUNTY
15
RAMSEY
COUNTY
76
County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue
Intersection Control Evaluation
Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 8
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Traffic Control Analysis
The following subsections detail the analysis used for determining the appropriate traffic
control for this intersection. Twelve hours of turning movements (6:00 AM-6:00 PM) were
counted on February 7, 2018 and used to perform a traffic signal warrant analysis and
all-way stop warrant analysis.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Part 4 of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) contains
information pertaining to highway traffic signals, including a series of traffic -signal
warrants that define the minimum conditions under which installing a traffic signal could
be justified. These traffic signal warrants have been developed as national guidelines to
promote continuity of traffic control devices and to ensure that traffic signals are installed
at intersections that benefit from their operations. The following are the nine MnMUTCD
traffic signal warrants:
Warrant 1-Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume
Warrant 2-Four-Hour Vehicle Volume
Warrant 3-Peak Hour Vehicle Volume
Warrant 4-Pedestrian Volume
Warrant 5-School Crossing
Warrant 6-Coordinated Signal System
Warrant 7-Crash Experience
Warrant 8-Roadway Network
Warrant 9-Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Table 4C-1 70% volumes were also used for warrant analysis. The MnMUTCD allows
for use of these values when the conditions are as follows:
“May be used when the major-street speed exceeds 40 mph or in an isolated community
with a population of less than 10,000.” – MnMUTCD Table 4C-1, Warrant 1, Eight-Hour
Vehicular Volume.
According to the MnMUTCD, inclusion of right-turn volumes for warrant analysis is
dependent on engineering judgment, site factors and turning movement volumes. By
applying engineering judgment, right-turn movements on only the westbound approach
of the intersection were removed from the analysis due to the presence of a right-turn
lane.
The following is the result of the traffic signal warrant analysis. See Appendix C for
additional information.
▪ Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume: NOT MET
▪ Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicle Volume: NOT MET
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 9
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
▪ Warrant 3 – Peak-hour Vehicle Volume: NOT MET
▪ Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume: NOT MET
▪ Warrant 5 – School Crossing: N/A
▪ Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System: N/A
▪ Warrant 7 – Crash Experience1: NOT MET
▪ Warrant 8 – Roadway Network: NOT MET
▪ Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a Grade Crossing: N/A
No Traffic Signal Warrants are met with existing traffic volumes, lane geometry, and
speed limits.
All-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Part 2B of the MnMUTCD contains information pertaining to the all-way stop control with
criteria relating to vehicular volumes and crash history that define the minimum conditions
under which installing an all-way stop could be justified.
The following are the discussions regarding whether the intersection geometry and/or
traffic volumes meet the guidance in the MnMUTCD. Text in italics denotes guidance from
the MnMUTCD, and regular text denotes discussion on whether conditions meet the
guidance. Using the provided count data, all-way stop warrants were analyzed.
• A multi-way stop application can be used as an interim measure while
arrangements can be made to install a traffic signal – A traffic signal is not
warranted at this intersection.
• Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to
correction by a multi-way stop installation - Only two correctable crashes
occurred within a 12-month period within the past 5 years at this intersection.
• Minimum volumes – 3 of the required 8 hours were met, See Appendix D for
volume analysis.
• Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where the preceding criteria are all
satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. – 7 of the required 8 hours were met,
See Appendix D for the 80% minimum value analysis. (the eighth hour was
three vehicles short of being met)
• The need to control left-turn conflicts – Southbound left-turn conflicts need to be
controlled due to high turning movements volumes.
• The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high
pedestrian volumes – The intersection does not currently experience a high level
of pedestrian and bicycle traffic that would require installation of a multi-way stop
to provide adequate operations, however trail improvements are planned as part
of this project.
1 MnDOT 2015 TEM states: Current MnDOT policy is that, in general, warrant 7 is not applicable to an
intersection that is already signalized.
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 10
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
• Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is
not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to stop – Sightlines are currently visible.
• An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of
similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would
improve operational characteristics of the intersection – County Road E and Old
Snelling Avenue are of similar design, and have similar functional classification,
and traffic currently operates with a multi-way stop.
Two warrants were met at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue
which does meet the guidance for an all-way stop according to the MnMUTCD.
Although no traffic warrants for roundabouts currently exist, the MnDOT Intersection
Control Evaluation Manual states that if a traffic signal or an all-way stop warrant is met,
a roundabout should also be considered as a warranted traffic control device. There are
all-way stop warrants that are currently met for this intersection, therefore a roundabout
is considered to be justified.
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 11
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Crash Evaluation
Crash reductions for each type of intersection control were estimated based on the
proposed layout and the crash reduction factors from the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) Crash Reduction Factors and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) Roundabout Crash Reduction Factors. Table 2 shows the projected crash rate
and yearly crashes for each traffic control type using the existing traffic volumes. Fewer
crashes mean a reduced cost to the local economy in terms of lost productivity related to
property damage, injuries, and congestion on local roadways.
Table 2 – Existing and Projected Crash Rates by Traffic Control Type
Traffic Forecasts
Base year 2018 volumes were used from the Bethel University Traffic Study (SRF, 2013)
and forecasted out to year 2038. Based on the City of Arden Hills - 2030 Comprehensive
Plan, traffic volumes in the area are projected to rise by 0.5% annually. For future
analysis, the 0.5% annual increase in traffic movement volumes will be used in all
simulations to determine level of service.
Intersection Capacity Evaluation
Intersection operations are evaluated in terms of average seconds of delay per vehicle,
each approach and turning movement for the intersection. The average number of
seconds of delay is broken into six ranges assigned letter grades A through F defining
each level of service (LOS) as shown in Figure 4. The ranges for unsignalized
intersections are narrower than the ranges for signalized intersections. This is because
many factors including the intangible factors of driver discomfort and frustration are
considered. A one-minute delay at a red light is perceived as being more tolerable than
one minute waiting for a gap in t raffic at a stop sign, especially when there are vehicles
queued behind. It is generally recognized that LOS D is the lowest acceptable LOS for
All-Way Stop
(existing)0.68 3.00
All-Way Stop
(Metro district average rate)0.34 1.51
Traffic Signal
(Metro district average rate)0.52 2.29
Urban Single Lane
Roundabout 0.60 0.27 1.18
* Crash reduction factors taken from MnDOT's HSIP Program guidance
Crash
Reduction
Factor*
** Crash rate for proposed improvements = (1 - CRF) x (existing CR)
Traffic Control Crash Rate**
Projected
Crashes Per
Year
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 12
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
urban intersections. Intersection capacity is also defined in terms of queue lengths of
stopped vehicles. A 100-foot queue is approximately equal to four cars.
Figure 4 – Level of Service Guidelines
Synchro / SimTraffic, and RODEL software was used to simulate existing and future traffic
operations at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue.
Synchro is a macroscopic software application used for optimizing traffic signal timing and
performing capacity analysis of roadway networks consisting of stop, yield, and signalized
traffic control conditions. The underlying equations are based on Highw ay Capacity
Manual procedures. SimTraffic is a microscopic software application that performs
simulation and animation of vehicular traffic based on Synchro inputs. SimTraffic follows
individual cars and uses a wide variety of variables (including some random variables) to
simulate real-world driver behavior.
Traffic operations at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue were
simulated using existing (2018) and 2038 traffic volumes for the existing traffic control
and lane geometry (no build condition) and for each proposed traffic control and lane
geometry (build conditions).
80
55
35
20
10
LOS A
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
LOS F
Not CongestedCongested50
35
25
10
LOS A
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
LOS F
Not CongestedCongested15
Signalized Intersection Un-signalized IntersectionControl Delay per Vehicle (sec.)Control Delay per Vehicle (sec.)SOURCE: Level of Service thresholds from the Highway Capacity Manual.
K:\Traffic\Level of Service (LOS)\LOS Delay Graphic.ppt
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 13
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RODEL is a software program that predicts the traffic performance of roundabouts. The
capacity estimates are based on research completed at the British Transport and Road
Research Laboratory (TRRL) and use empirical equations originally published in 1980.
RODEL calculates the capacity of each roundabout entry as a function of the circulating
flow past that entry and six other geometric parameters. An important f eature of RODEL
is the capability to vary the evaluation confidence level, which provides a factor of safety
that takes into account the variability of traffic predictions and flow characteristics.
RODEL, however, is not able to model the interaction of traffic in a system of intersections.
Existing Operations Analysis
The intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue is currently all-way stop
controlled. This configuration was simulated in Synchro/SimTraffic for both the AM and
PM peak hours using existing (2018) traffic volumes. The results of the existing condition
traffic operations analysis are summarized in Table 3. Detailed modeling results are
provided in Appendix E.
Table 3 – 2018 Existing Condition Operations Summary (SimTraffic)
The traffic operations analysis shows that the intersection currently operates at an
acceptable LOS A during the AM peak hour and LOS B during the PM peak hour. The
analysis results indicate there are no major queuing issues currently at the intersection.
However, based on field observation during peak hours, the intersection seems to
perform far poorer that what the analysis is indicating. In order to perform a sensitivity
analysis, data from the Bethel University Expansion Traffic Study will also be used for the
2018 and 2038 scenarios.
2018 No Build (Bethel Study volumes) Traffic Operations Analysis
The 2018 no build analysis was modeled using Synchro/SimTraffic software with the
Bethel Study’s projected 2018 traffic volumes. This scenario assumes existing lane
geometry, access, and traffic control. The results of the 2018 no build condition traffic
operations analysis are summarized in Table 4. Further modeling results are provided in
Appendix E.
Left Through Right Left Through Right
NB 5 (A)9 (A)4 (A)6 (A)11 (B)4 (A)
WB 6 (A)11 (B)6 (A)8 (A)12 (B)8 (A)
SB 8 (A)11 (B)5 (A)10 (B)12 (B)5 (A)
EB 6 (A)8 (A)4 (A)11 (B)15 (C)12 (B)
* Delay measured in seconds per vehicle
Intersection
ControlLocation Approach Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
8 (A)
PM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
11 (B)All-Way StopAM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 14
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Table 4 – 2018 (Bethel Study volumes) No Build Operations Summary (SimTraffic)
With the 2018 projected volumes, the intersection is expected to operate with an overall
B during the AM peak hour and an overall E during the PM peak hour. The intersection
was forecasted to fail during the PM peak hour under the no build condition.
2018 Roundabout Traffic Operations Analysis
The 2018 Roundabout analysis was modeled using RODEL software with projected 2018
traffic volumes as described in the “Traffic Forecasts” section. This scenario assumes
roundabout alternative lane geometry, access, and traffic control. The results of the 2018
roundabout condition traffic operations analysis are summarized in Table 5. Further
modeling results are provided in Appendix E.
Table 5 – 2018 (Study volumes) Roundabout Operations Summary (RODEL)
With the 2018 volumes and the proposed geometry, the intersection will operate with an
overall LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. The roundabout alternative would be
designed to accommodate the Bethel University expansion and future growth in the area.
2038 No Build Traffic Operations Analysis
The 2038 no build analysis was modeled using Synchro/SimTraffic software with
projected 2038 traffic volumes as described in the “Traffic Forecasts” section. This
scenario assumes existing lane geometry, access, and traffic control. The results of the
2038 no build condition traffic operations analysis are summarized in Table 6. Further
modeling results are provided in Appendix E.
Left Through Right Left Through Right
NB 5 (A)11 (B)6 (A)8 (A)15 (C)9 (A)
WB 9 (A)15 (C)9 (A)12 (B)21 (C)12 (B)
SB 16 (C)14 (B)8 (A)74 (F)40 (E)33 (D)
EB 9 (A)11 (B)6 (A)43 (E)56 (F)51 (F)
Intersection
ControlLocation Approach Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
12 (B)
PM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
41 (E)All-Way StopAM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E
* Delay measured in seconds per vehicle
ControlLocation Approach Approach
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
Approach
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
NB 5 (A)5 (A)
WB 7 (A)8 (A)
SB 8 (A)8 (A)
EB 5 (A)10 (B)
Intersection PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
RoundaboutCR E & Old Snelling 7 (A)8 (A)
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 15
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Table 6 – 2038 No Build Operations Summary (SimTraffic)
With the 2038 projected volumes, the intersection is expected to operate with an overall
C during the AM peak hour and an overall F during the PM peak hour. The intersection
will continue to operate extremely poor during the PM peak hour, with southbound and
eastbound queues expected to reach over 1,000 feet under the no build condition.
2038 Roundabout Traffic Operations Analysis
The 2038 Roundabout analysis was modeled using RODEL software with projected 2038
traffic volumes as described in the “Traffic Forecasts” section. This scenario assumes
the roundabout alternative lane geometry, access, and traffic control. The results of the
2038 build condition traffic operations analysis are summarized in Table 7. Further
modeling results are provided in Appendix E.
Table 7 – 2038 Roundabout Operations Summary (RODEL)
With the 2038 projected volumes and the roundabout alternative geometry, the
intersection is expected to continue operating with an overall LOS A during the AM and
PM peak hours.
Left Through Right Left Through Right
NB 6 (A)12 (B)6 (A)8 (A)16 (C)9 (A)
WB 9 (A)17 (C)10 (B)12 (B)28 (D)13 (B)
SB 32 (D)18 (C)12 (B)158 (F)109 (F)98 (F)
EB 10 (B)11 (B)7 (A)175 (F)187 (F)182 (F)
* Delay measured in seconds per vehicle
Intersection
ControlLocation Approach Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
19 (C)
PM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
104 (F)All-Way StopAM Peak
Movement Delay* (LOS)
Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E ControlLocation Approach Approach
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
Approach
Delay* (LOS)
Intersection
Delay* (LOS)
NB 5 (A)6 (A)
WB 8 (A)10 (B)
SB 10 (B)10 (B)
EB 5 (A)13 (B)
Intersection PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
RoundaboutCR E & Old Snelling 8 (A)11 (B)
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 16
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Evaluation Considerations
Right of Way Impacts
Maintaining the existing geometry and traffic control (all-way stop control application)
would require no additional right of way. The build alternative would require the
acquisition of right of way.
Project Costs
• All-Way Stop Control (existing geometry and traffic control) – would require no
construction or maintenance costs.
• Roundabout – Total cost for the construction of a roundabout and surrounding
improvements is estimated to be ~$1,200,000.
Political Consideration / Public Input
This project is in the pre-design stage and the purpose of this Intersection Control
Evaluation is to provide data and analysis to decision makers regarding the
performance, safety, operations and other characteristics of the existing traffic control,
traffic signal control and a single-lane roundabout.
The traffic signal control alternative does not meet warrants necessary for installation of
a traffic signal. The existing all-way stop condition is expected to operate poorly with
expected traffic growth. The roundabout is expected to provide a safer and more
efficiently operating intersection than the other alternatives.
Design Data
The roundabout alternative would be designed to be an urban, single-lane roundabout.
The geometric layout of the roundabout alternative is provided in Figure 5. The design
vehicle used for this intersection is a WB-62. The truck turning paths are shown in Figure
6. The circulatory roadway width for the roundabout alternative would be 20’ (face-to-face
of curb). A 14’ truck apron would encompass the center island to provide space for larger
trucks to navigate the roundabout. A fast path was also completed for this intersection
and is summarized in Figure 7. The preliminary design of the roundabout alternative
meets the speed requirements in NCHRP 672: Roundabouts an Informational Guide, 2nd
Edition. A horizontal sight distance analysis was completed for this intersection, and the
results are shown in Figure 8.
COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 17
WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Alternatives Analysis
Based on field evaluation and observation, the existing geometry and traffic control at the
study intersection has poor operation during the afternoon and particularly the p.m. peak
hour. Traffic simulation modeling indicates that expected traffic growth at this intersection
will result in increasingly poorer operations. The inte rsection has experienced above
average crash and severity rates, and the intersection volumes do not meet traffic signal
warrants. Due to these issues, a single-lane roundabout is an appropriate method for
providing a safer intersection with improved operation.
Conclusion
A roundabout at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling Avenue is justified.
The intersection currently has an all-way stop control application and currently has
significant delays and queuing issues during the PM peak hour. Traffic volumes are
expected to increase over the next 20 years and a roundabout will accommodate the
higher volumes and provide a safer alternative compare d to the existing traffic control.
Figure 5: Proposed Roundabout Geometry
14'20'150'Ol
d Sn
elli
n
g Av
e
14'20'
57'R
43'R200'R
57'R
100'R
516'R
500'R
100'R
500'R
120'R
100'R
766'R
100'R 750'R
250'R
250'R
57'R
100'R
100'R
2000'R
350'R
1984'R
77'R
100'R
466'R
450'R
100'R
200'R
Lake Johanna Blvd
516'R
Date: Printed:WSB Filename:K:\011498-000\Cad\Exhibits\ICE\F5 - Proposed Roundabout Geometry.dgn10/8/2018
ICE Report|Arden Hills, MN
County Road E at Old Snelling Avenue
N
0 25 ft 50 ft
Right Turns Left Turns (EB/WB)Left Turns (NB/SB)
Steering Angle
Lock to Lock Time
Articulating Angle
WB-62
Trailer Track
Tractor Track
Trailer Width
Tractor Width
19.504.00
feet
8.50
8.50:
8.00
8.00
:
:
:
0.00
2.50 41.00
15.00 48.00
:
:
:6.0
28.4
70.0
Figure 6: Truck Turning PathsOl
d
S
n
elli
n
g Av
e
County Road E County Road E
Ol
d
S
n
elli
n
g Av
e
County Road E
Ol
d
S
n
elli
n
g Av
e
Lake Johanna Blvd Lake Johanna Blvd Lake Johanna Blvd
Date: Printed:WSB Filename:K:\011498-000\Cad\Exhibits\ICE\F6 - Truck Turning Paths.dgn10/8/2018
ICE Report|Arden Hills, MN
County Road E at Old Snelling Avenue
WB-62AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
WB-62AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
WB-62
AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
WB-62
AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-62AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
WB-62AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
WB-62AASHTO 2011 (US)
(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
NNN
R5R2
R5
R3
Figure 7: Fast Path Analysis
R1
R5
R5
R1
R2
R3
R1
R2
R3
R1
R2
R3
R4 R4
R4R4
Old S
nellin
g Ave
County Road E
County Road E
Ol
d Sne
lli
ng Ave
Lake Johanna Blvd
Lake Johanna Blvd
FAST PATH ANALYSIS (CR E & OLD SNELLING AVE)
Approach Curve Radius Speed Differential
Relative Speed
Crosswalk
Distance to
Southbound R1 150 23.8 8.2
R2 105 19.1 3.6
R3 27 11.4 60
R4 60 15.6 0.0
R5 110 21.1 5.6
Northbound R1 152 23.9 8.4
R2 65 16.0 0.5
R3 25 9.4 54
R4 60 15.6 0.0
R5 108 21.0 5.4
Westbound R1 163 24.6 9.0
R2 80 17.3 1.7
R3 24 8.4 54
R4 60 15.6 0.0
R5 107 20.9 5.3
Eastbound R1 150 23.8 8.2
R2 90 18.1 2.5
R3 27 11.4 66
R4 60 15.6 0.0
R5 140 23.2 7.6
Notes
1. R3 is calculated using R2 or R4 speed + acceleration to crosswalk.
2. Relative Speed Differential is from minimum speed (typically R4) within roundabout.
according to NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts an Informal Guide: Second Edition
3. Relative Speed Difference should be in the range of no more than 10 - 15 mph, Date: Printed:WSB Filename:K:\011498-000\Cad\Exhibits\ICE\F7 - Fast Path Analysis.dgn10/8/2018
County Road E at Old Snelling Ave
ICE Report|Arden Hills, MN
N N
LEGEND
CLEAR ZONE
OBSTRUCTION
Figure 8: Horizontal Sight DistanceOl
d
S
n
elli
n
g Av
e
County Road E
Date: Printed:WSB Filename:K:\011498-000\Cad\Exhibits\ICE\F8 - Horizontal Sight Distance Analysis.dgn10/8/2018
County Road E at Old Snelling Ave
ICE Report|Arden Hills, MN
N
APPENDIX A
Existing Turning Movement Counts
File Name : Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 2/7/2018
Page No : 1
Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
6am-6pm
Arden Hills, MN
20's
Groups Printed- Cars +
Old Snelling Ave
From North
Co Rd E
From East
Old Snelling Ave
From South
Lake Johanna Blvd
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
06:00 AM 1 0 8 0 9 15 10 1 0 26 1 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 41
06:15 AM 1 0 11 0 12 17 12 1 0 30 2 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 10 54
06:30 AM 4 2 23 0 29 26 14 1 0 41 5 0 0 0 5 1 8 4 0 13 88
06:45 AM 6 2 29 0 37 44 23 0 0 67 3 1 3 0 7 0 12 5 0 17 128
Total 12 4 71 0 87 102 59 3 0 164 11 2 4 0 17 1 33 9 0 43 311
07:00 AM 6 7 66 0 79 68 26 1 0 95 3 6 2 1 12 1 16 12 0 29 215
07:15 AM 6 20 68 0 94 48 29 7 0 84 6 8 5 0 19 1 14 9 0 24 221
07:30 AM 9 17 65 0 91 47 28 3 0 78 7 5 2 0 14 2 21 2 0 25 208
07:45 AM 16 8 59 0 83 77 61 4 0 142 9 6 7 0 22 3 22 13 0 38 285
Total 37 52 258 0 347 240 144 15 0 399 25 25 16 1 67 7 73 36 0 116 929
08:00 AM 4 20 64 1 89 67 56 5 0 128 1 7 3 0 11 0 31 7 0 38 266
08:15 AM 10 28 54 0 92 48 42 3 0 93 6 5 2 0 13 3 29 6 0 38 236
08:30 AM 7 15 43 0 65 54 42 7 0 103 6 0 3 0 9 0 29 5 0 34 211
08:45 AM 7 12 51 0 70 85 34 3 0 122 3 2 3 2 10 3 26 5 1 35 237
Total 28 75 212 1 316 254 174 18 0 446 16 14 11 2 43 6 115 23 1 145 950
09:00 AM 6 1 49 0 56 47 25 3 0 75 6 3 3 0 12 1 1 3 0 5 148
09:15 AM 5 14 39 0 58 35 28 3 0 66 3 5 0 0 8 1 20 7 0 28 160
09:30 AM 8 6 36 0 50 28 13 2 0 43 4 2 0 0 6 0 18 2 0 20 119
09:45 AM 4 12 19 0 35 33 15 2 0 50 6 4 0 0 10 2 21 3 0 26 121
Total 23 33 143 0 199 143 81 10 0 234 19 14 3 0 36 4 60 15 0 79 548
10:00 AM 1 6 30 0 37 21 10 6 0 37 3 0 1 0 4 1 18 1 0 20 98
10:15 AM 3 7 38 0 48 28 21 3 0 52 3 0 0 0 3 0 9 3 0 12 115
10:30 AM 3 5 35 0 43 34 16 1 1 52 1 2 0 2 5 2 12 4 0 18 118
10:45 AM 4 8 32 0 44 44 13 6 0 63 0 4 0 0 4 2 17 5 0 24 135
Total 11 26 135 0 172 127 60 16 1 204 7 6 1 2 16 5 56 13 0 74 466
11:00 AM 8 8 24 0 40 42 21 6 0 69 3 4 2 0 9 0 26 3 0 29 147
11:15 AM 3 4 26 0 33 43 13 1 0 57 4 2 1 0 7 1 22 6 0 29 126
11:30 AM 1 7 18 2 28 39 19 8 0 66 7 1 1 0 9 1 23 2 2 28 131
11:45 AM 5 5 27 0 37 40 31 4 0 75 2 3 0 1 6 1 31 10 1 43 161
Total 17 24 95 2 138 164 84 19 0 267 16 10 4 1 31 3 102 21 3 129 565
12:00 PM 4 13 19 0 36 53 17 7 0 77 5 5 0 0 10 2 22 7 0 31 154
12:15 PM 2 11 39 1 53 57 23 4 0 84 3 4 0 0 7 0 23 4 0 27 171
12:30 PM 4 15 43 0 62 58 34 2 0 94 2 5 1 0 8 7 22 5 0 34 198
12:45 PM 4 8 32 0 44 45 21 5 0 71 2 1 1 0 4 2 29 5 0 36 155
Total 14 47 133 1 195 213 95 18 0 326 12 15 2 0 29 11 96 21 0 128 678
01:00 PM 3 4 41 0 48 45 30 3 0 78 7 2 0 0 9 1 26 5 0 32 167
01:15 PM 4 15 43 0 62 47 22 7 0 76 4 1 1 0 6 3 30 6 0 39 183
01:30 PM 3 14 45 0 62 42 32 6 0 80 3 2 0 1 6 1 17 5 1 24 172
01:45 PM 10 9 44 0 63 40 18 4 0 62 5 3 0 0 8 3 28 7 0 38 171
Total 20 42 173 0 235 174 102 20 0 296 19 8 1 1 29 8 101 23 1 133 693
02:00 PM 2 8 32 0 42 51 31 4 0 86 3 1 3 0 7 4 33 7 0 44 179
02:15 PM 5 10 65 0 80 46 19 9 0 74 5 4 1 0 10 2 31 5 1 39 203
02:30 PM 6 11 43 0 60 59 31 3 0 93 4 2 0 0 6 2 24 6 0 32 191
02:45 PM 4 18 50 0 72 39 21 3 0 63 3 1 1 0 5 6 35 6 0 47 187
Total 17 47 190 0 254 195 102 19 0 316 15 8 5 0 28 14 123 24 1 162 760
03:00 PM 3 14 50 0 67 44 35 12 0 91 4 2 0 0 6 3 32 6 0 41 205
03:15 PM 6 13 41 0 60 40 27 5 0 72 1 7 0 0 8 2 28 3 0 33 173
03:30 PM 5 19 46 0 70 50 18 8 0 76 7 1 0 0 8 1 34 13 0 48 202
03:45 PM 8 19 44 0 71 73 24 10 0 107 2 6 0 0 8 4 38 11 0 53 239
Total 22 65 181 0 268 207 104 35 0 346 14 16 0 0 30 10 132 33 0 175 819
WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Ave S
Minneapolis, MN
File Name : Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 2/7/2018
Page No : 2
Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
6am-6pm
Arden Hills, MN
20's
Groups Printed- Cars +
Old Snelling Ave
From North
Co Rd E
From East
Old Snelling Ave
From South
Lake Johanna Blvd
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
04:00 PM 5 20 54 0 79 58 21 5 0 84 4 2 2 0 8 7 51 19 0 77 248
04:15 PM 13 23 68 0 104 71 47 12 1 131 3 2 2 0 7 7 70 15 2 94 336
04:30 PM 8 28 65 0 101 83 37 5 0 125 5 0 2 0 7 3 87 10 3 103 336
04:45 PM 1 18 52 0 71 98 40 8 0 146 1 2 2 0 5 5 86 17 0 108 330
Total 27 89 239 0 355 310 145 30 1 486 13 6 8 0 27 22 294 61 5 382 1250
05:00 PM 4 12 60 0 76 93 24 7 0 124 3 7 1 0 11 4 68 18 0 90 301
05:15 PM 11 21 54 0 86 98 42 11 0 151 4 1 0 0 5 4 72 13 0 89 331
05:30 PM 9 23 58 0 90 80 21 12 0 113 4 1 0 0 5 7 51 9 0 67 275
05:45 PM 8 17 34 1 60 82 23 7 0 112 4 3 0 0 7 7 57 10 1 75 254
Total 32 73 206 1 312 353 110 37 0 500 15 12 1 0 28 22 248 50 1 321 1161
Grand Total 260 577 2036 5 2878 2482 1260 240 2 3984 182 136 56 7 381 113 1433 329 12 1887 9130
Apprch %9 20 70.7 0.2 62.3 31.6 6 0.1 47.8 35.7 14.7 1.8 6 75.9 17.4 0.6
Total %2.8 6.3 22.3 0.1 31.5 27.2 13.8 2.6 0 43.6 2 1.5 0.6 0.1 4.2 1.2 15.7 3.6 0.1 20.7
WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Ave S
Minneapolis, MN
File Name : Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 2/7/2018
Page No : 3
Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
6am-6pm
Arden Hills, MN
20's
Old Snelling Ave
From North
Co Rd E
From East
Old Snelling Ave
From South
Lake Johanna Blvd
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 16 8 59 0 83 77 61 4 0 142 9 6 7 0 22 3 22 13 0 38 285
08:00 AM 4 20 64 1 89 67 56 5 0 128 1 7 3 0 11 0 31 7 0 38 266
08:15 AM 10 28 54 0 92 48 42 3 0 93 6 5 2 0 13 3 29 6 0 38 236
08:30 AM 7 15 43 0 65 54 42 7 0 103 6 0 3 0 9 0 29 5 0 34 211
Total Volume 37 71 220 1 329 246 201 19 0 466 22 18 15 0 55 6 111 31 0 148 998
% App. Total
PHF .578 .634 .859 .250 .894 .799 .824 .679 .000 .820 .611 .643 .536 .000 .625 .500 .895 .596 .000 .974 .875
Old Snelling Ave Lake Johanna Blvd Co Rd E Old Snelling Ave
Right
37
Thru
71
Left
220
Peds
1
InOut Total
295 329 624 Right246 Thru201 Left19 Peds0 OutTotalIn353 466 819 Left
15
Thru
18
Right
22
Peds
0
Out TotalIn
96 55 151 Left31 Thru111 Right6 Peds0 TotalOutIn253 148 401 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Cars +
Peak Hour Data
North
WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Ave S
Minneapolis, MN
File Name : Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 2/7/2018
Page No : 4
Co Rd E & Old Snelling Ave
6am-6pm
Arden Hills, MN
20's
Old Snelling Ave
From North
Co Rd E
From East
Old Snelling Ave
From South
Lake Johanna Blvd
From West
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 13 23 68 0 104 71 47 12 1 131 3 2 2 0 7 7 70 15 2 94 336
04:30 PM 8 28 65 0 101 83 37 5 0 125 5 0 2 0 7 3 87 10 3 103 336
04:45 PM 1 18 52 0 71 98 40 8 0 146 1 2 2 0 5 5 86 17 0 108 330
05:00 PM 4 12 60 0 76 93 24 7 0 124 3 7 1 0 11 4 68 18 0 90 301
Total Volume 26 81 245 0 352 345 148 32 1 526 12 11 7 0 30 19 311 60 5 395 1303
% App. Total
PHF .500 .723 .901 .000 .846 .880 .787 .667 .250 .901 .600 .393 .875 .000 .682 .679 .894 .833 .417 .914 .969
Old Snelling Ave Lake Johanna Blvd Co Rd E Old Snelling Ave
Right
26
Thru
81
Left
245
Peds
0
InOut Total
416 352 768 Right345 Thru148 Left32 Peds1 OutTotalIn568 526 1094 Left
7
Thru
11
Right
12
Peds
0
Out TotalIn
132 30 162 Left60 Thru311 Right19 Peds5 TotalOutIn181 395 576 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Cars +
Peak Hour Data
North
WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Ave S
Minneapolis, MN
APPENDIX B
Crash Diagram
Light
Classification by Type L = Daylight
DN = Dawn
Fatal DU = Dusk
Personal Injury DL = Dark Lighted
Prop. Damage DO = Dark, Lights Off
Total 0 1 D = Dark, Unlighted
Weather
C = Clear
CL = Cloudy
R = Rain
S = Snow
SL = Sleet
F = Fog
Surface
D = Dry
I = Icy
W = Wet
S=Snow
Unknown 1
2/22/2013 (1) L-S-S
1/24/2014 (4) DU--I2/20/2014 (5) L-S-SL5/22/2015 (7) L-C-DSnow 2 Unknown 0
Mist 0
Sleet 0 Unknown 0 12:00 AM - 6:00 AM 1
4:00 PM - 7:00 PM 3
Rain 1 Snow 3 Fall (Sep - Nov)1 7:00 PM - 12:00 AM 0
Fog 0 Icy 1 Summer (Jun - Aug)2
6:00 AM - 10:00 AM 0
Cloudy 1 Wet 1 Spring (Mar - May)2 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM 5
Weather Pavement Time of Year Time of Day
Clear 4 Dry 4 Winter (Dec - Feb)4
1
2 2 2 1 1
2 2 1 1 0 1
0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Side Swipe Rear End Right Angle Right Turn Ran Off Road Ped/Bicycle Other
Out of Control
Left Turn
Right Angle
Collision Types
Rear End
Head-On
7/28/2015 (8) L-C-DSide Swipe
Bicycle
Fatality
Injury
12/23/2013 (3) L-CL-S
10/2/2014 (6) L-R-W
Parked Vehicle
Fixed Object
8/20/2015 (9) L-C-D
Backing Vehicle
Non-moving Vehicle
Pedestrian
Crash Diagram
County Rd E & Old Snelling Ave, Arden Hills, MN
January 2013 - December 2015
Symbols
Moving Vehicle
County Rd E Old Snelling AveNotes:
5/1/2013 (2) L-C-D: Two cars travelling
in unknown directions had an unknown
type of collision. No personal injuries
were reported.
12/23/2013 (3) L-CL-S: A vehicle
travelling east struck a pedestrian
travelling south. The pedestrian failed
to yield the right of way and resulted in
an unknown type of collision. No
personal injuries were reported.
County Rd E
Old Snelling AveC
APPENDIX C
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue
Ramsey
Mallori
Speed Approach Description Lanes
POPULATION < 10,000?No 35 Major App 1 County Rd E (WB)2
0.70 FACTOR USED?No 30 Major App 3 County Rd E (EB)2
EXISTING SIGNAL ?No 45 Minor App 2 Old Snelling (SB)2
0.80 FACTOR USED?No 40 Minor App 4 Old Snelling (NB)2
Notes:
600/900 200/100 200/100 480/720 160/80 160/80
MAJOR
APP 1
MAJOR
APP. 3
TOTAL
1+3
MINOR
APP. 2
MINOR
APP. 4
MAJOR
1A/1B
MINOR 2
1A/1B
MINOR 4
1A/1B
MET
SAME
1A/1B
MAJOR
1C
A/B
MINOR 2
1C
A/B
MINOR 4
1C
A/B
MET
SAME
1C (A/B)
12:00 AM -1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
1:00 AM -2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
2:00 AM -3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
3:00 AM -4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
4:00 AM -5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
5:00 AM -6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
6:00 AM -7:00 AM 87 62 149 17 43 ////////
7:00 AM -8:00 AM 347 159 506 66 116 ///X /X///X /
8:00 AM -9:00 AM 315 192 507 41 144 ///X /X///X /
9:00 AM -10:00 AM 199 91 290 36 79 ////////
10:00 AM -11:00 AM 172 76 248 14 74 ////////
11:00 AM -12:00 PM 136 103 239 30 126 ///X ////X /
12:00 PM -1:00 PM 194 113 307 29 128 ///X ////X /
1:00 PM -2:00 PM 235 122 357 28 132 ///X ////X /
2:00 PM -3:00 PM 254 121 375 28 161 ///X ///X/X /
3:00 PM -4:00 PM 268 139 407 30 175 ///X ///X/X /
4:00 PM -5:00 PM 355 175 530 27 377 //X/X /X//X/X X/
5:00 PM -6:00 PM 311 147 458 28 320 //X/X ///X/X /
6:00 PM -7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
7:00 PM -8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
8:00 PM -9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
9:00 PM -10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
10:00 PM -11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
11:00 PM -12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////////
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
0 8
0 8
1 8
0 8
SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Year:
Condition:
Warrant 1A
7/9/2018
THRESHOLDS 1A/1B/1C:
Warrant
Satisfied?
Not Satisfied
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
DATE:
OPERATOR:
HOUR
WARRANT 1 - EIGHT HOUR VOLUME
Not Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Warrant 1B
Warrant 1C (Cond A)
Warrant 1C (Cond B)
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 2
Ramsey
Mallori
Speed Approach Description Lanes
35 Major App1:County Rd E (WB)2
0.70 FACTOR USED?No 30 Major App3:County Rd E (EB)2
POPULATION < 10,000?No 45 Minor App2:Old Snelling (SB)2
40 Minor App4:Old Snelling (NB)2
Notes:
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
0 4
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
0 1
7/9/2018
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
Not Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Warrant 2
Warrant 3
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR VOLUME
Warrant
Satisfied?
Warrant
Satisfied?
WARRANT 2 - FOUR HOUR VOLUME
OPERATOR:
DATE:
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Volume Approach (vph)Major Street Combined Volume (vph)
Figure 1: Four-Hour Warrant Analysis
Minor 2 Warrant Threshold Minor 4 Warrant Threshold Hourly Count - Minor 2 Hourly Count - Minor 4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Volume Approach (vph)Major Street Combined Volume (vph)
Figure 2: Peak Hour Warrant Analysis
Minor 2 Warrant Threshold Minor 4 Warrant Threshold Hourly Count - Minor 2 Hourly Count - Minor 4
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 3
Ramsey
Mallori
Speed Approach Description
35 Major App1:County Rd E (WB)
0.70 FACTOR USED?No 30 Major App3:County Rd E (EB)
POPULATION < 10,000?No 45 Minor App2:Old Snelling (SB)
40 Minor App4:Old Snelling (NB)
MAJOR
APP 1
MAJOR
APP. 3
TOTAL
1+3
PEDS
X-ING
MAJOR
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
12:00 AM -1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4
1:00 AM -2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1
2:00 AM -3:00 AM 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM -4:00 AM 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM -5:00 AM 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM -6:00 AM 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM -7:00 AM 87 62 149 0
7:00 AM -8:00 AM 347 159 506 0
8:00 AM -9:00 AM 315 192 507 1
9:00 AM -10:00 AM 199 91 290 0
10:00 AM -11:00 AM 172 76 248 1
11:00 AM -12:00 PM 136 103 239 3
12:00 PM -1:00 PM 194 113 307 0
1:00 PM -2:00 PM 235 122 357 1
2:00 PM -3:00 PM 254 121 375 1
3:00 PM -4:00 PM 268 139 407 0
4:00 PM -5:00 PM 355 175 530 6
5:00 PM -6:00 PM 311 147 458 1
6:00 PM -7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM -8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM -9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM -10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM -11:00 PM 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM -12:00 AM 0 0 0 0
No
If Yes, will proposed signal inhibit
the progression of traffic on the
major approach?
N/A
Warrant 4 Satisfied?Not Satisfied
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
Warrant 4 (Peak Pedestrian Vol.)
OPERATOR:
WARRANT 4 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME
HOUR
DATE:7/9/2018
Warrant 4 (4-Hour Pedestrian Vol.)
Is crossing within 300' of other
signal or stop sign controlling the
major approach?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Volume Approach (vph)Major Street Combined Volume (vph)
Figure 3: Pedestrian Warrant Analysis
Pedestrians Crossing Major Road Pedestrian Four-Hour Warrant Threshold Pedestrian Peak-Hour Warrant Threshold
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 4
Ramsey
Mallori
Is the principal reason for the signal to accommodate the movement of schoolchildren across the major road?No
Are there at least 20 schoolchildren crossing the major road in the highest crossing hour?N/A
If both above questions are answered yes, calculate the available gaps below:
Are needed gaps greater than available gaps?N/A
Is crossing within 300' of other signal or stop sign controlling the major approach?N/A
If Yes, will proposed signal inhibit the progression of traffic on the major approach?N/A
Warrant 5 met?No
Part A
Is the street a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominately in one direction?No
Do adjacent traffic control signals provide adequate platooning?N/A
Part B
Is the street a two-way street?Yes
Do adjacent traffic control signals provide adequate platooning?Yes
Will proposed signal provide for progressive operation of traffic?N/A
Will proposed signal spacing be less than 1000 feet?N/A
Provide proof of platooning issues:
Warrant 6 met?No
WARRANT 6 - COORDINATED SIGNAL SYSTEM
N/A
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
DATE:7/9/2018
OPERATOR:
WARRANT 5 - SCHOOL CROSSING
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 4
Ramsey
Mallori
480/720 160/80 160/80
MAJOR
APP 1
MAJOR
APP. 3
TOTAL
1+3
MINOR
APP. 2
MINOR
APP. 4
MAJOR
7 A/B
MINOR 2
7 A/B
MINOR 4
7 A/B
MET
SAME
7 (A/B)
12:00 AM -1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
1:00 AM -2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
2:00 AM -3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
3:00 AM -4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
4:00 AM -5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
5:00 AM -6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
6:00 AM -7:00 AM 87 62 149 17 43 ////
7:00 AM -8:00 AM 347 159 506 66 116 X///X /
8:00 AM -9:00 AM 315 192 507 41 144 X///X /
9:00 AM -10:00 AM 199 91 290 36 79 ////
10:00 AM -11:00 AM 172 76 248 14 74 ////
11:00 AM -12:00 PM 136 103 239 30 126 ///X /
12:00 PM -1:00 PM 194 113 307 29 128 ///X /
1:00 PM -2:00 PM 235 122 357 28 132 ///X /
2:00 PM -3:00 PM 254 121 375 28 161 //X/X /
3:00 PM -4:00 PM 268 139 407 30 175 //X/X /
4:00 PM -5:00 PM 355 175 530 27 377 X//X/X X/
5:00 PM -6:00 PM 311 147 458 28 320 //X/X /
6:00 PM -7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
7:00 PM -8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
8:00 PM -9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
9:00 PM -10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
10:00 PM -11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
11:00 PM -12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ////
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
1 8
0 8
Has there been an adequare trial of alternatives that has failed to reduce the crash frequency?No
Crash History (within a 12-month period)
Number of
Crashes:
Right Angle:2 TOTAL:2
Left Turn:Required:5
Pedestrian:
Warrant 7 met?No
THRESHOLDS 1A/1B/1C:
HOUR
Warrant 7 (Cond A)
Warrant 7 (Cond B)
REF. POINT:
DATE:7/9/2018
OPERATOR:
WARRANT 7 - CRASH EXPERIENCE
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 5
Ramsey
Mallori
Major
Approach
Road
Minor
Approach
Road
Part of street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow No No
Rural or suburban highway outside, entering, or traversing a city No No
Appears as a major route on an official plan No No
Yes
Does the intersection have 5-Year projected traffic volumes that meet Warrants 1, 2, or 3?No
No
Warrant 8 met?No
No
Is the center of the railroad track less than 140 feet from the stop line or yield line?N/A
Clear storage distance (closest to)N/A
Approach crossing grade N/A
Rail traffic per day 0
Percent of high-occupancy buses on minor-street approach 0%
Percent of tractor-trailer trucks on minor-street approach 0%
Met (Hr)Required
(Hr)
0 1
Warrant 9 met?No
Warrant 9
Does the intersection have a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per
WARRANT 8 - ROADWAY NETWORK
Does the intersection have a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
DATE:7/9/2018
OPERATOR:
WARRANT 9 - INTERSECTION NEAR GRADE CROSSING
Is the principal reason for installation of a signal the proximity of the intersection to a grade crossing controlled by
a stop or yield control?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800Minor Street Adjusted Volume (vph)Major Street Combined Volume (vph)
Figure 4: Grade Crossing Warrant Analysis
Adjusted Approach Volume Grade Crossing Warrant Threshold
County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 6
Ramsey
Mallori
Warrant 1 Not Met Notes:
Condition A Not Met
Condition B Not Met
Condition C Not Met
Warrant 2 Not Met
Warrant 3 Not Met
Warrant 4 Not Met
Warrant 5 Not Met
Warrant 6 Not Met
Warrant 7 Not Met
Warrant 8 Not Met
Warrant 9 Not Met
WARRANT SUMMARY
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
REF. POINT:
DATE:7/9/2018
OPERATOR:
APPENDIX D
All-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
LOCATION:County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue
COUNTY:Ramsey
REF. POINT:Speed Approach Description Lanes
DATE:7/9/2018 35 Major App1:County Rd E (WB)2
30 Major App3:County Rd E (EB)2
OPERATOR:Mallori 45 Minor App2:Old Snelling (SB)2
40 Minor App4:Old Snelling (NB)2
0.70 FACTOR USED?Yes
VOLUME THRESHOLDS:240/160
/ /
1:00:00 AM / /
2:00:00 AM / /
3:00:00 AM / /
4:00:00 AM / /
5:00:00 AM / /
6:00:00 AM 87 62 17 43 / /
7:00:00 AM 347 159 66 116 X/ X/X
8:00:00 AM 315 192 41 144 X/ X/X
9:00:00 AM 199 91 36 79 / X/
10:00:00 AM 172 76 14 74 / X/
11:00:00 AM 136 103 30 126 / /
12:00:00 PM 194 113 29 128 X/ X/
1:00:00 PM 235 122 28 132 X/ X/X
2:00:00 PM 254 121 28 161 X/ X/X
3:00:00 PM 268 139 30 175 X/X X/X
4:00:00 PM 355 175 27 377 X/X X/X
5:00:00 PM 311 147 28 320 X/X X/X
6:00:00 PM / /
7:00:00 PM / /
8:00:00 PM / /
9:00:00 PM / /
10:00:00 PM / /
11:00:00 PM / /
Met (Hr)Required (Hr)
All Way Stop 100% Volume Warrant:3 8
All Way Stop 80% Volume Warrant:7 8
Minor road peak hour delay (seconds)15
Volume warrant met?No
357
375
407
507
239
307
80% VOLUME
WARRANT MET
458
ALL WAY STOP WARRANT
530
300
290
248
149
506 182
185
115
88
157
160
189
205
404
348
156
MINOR
APP. 2
MINOR
APP. 4
Year:2018
All-Way Stop
VOLUME WARRANT
200
HOUR
MAJOR
APP. 1
MAJOR
APP. 3
Existing Condition:
60
MAJOR TOTAL
Σ (APP. 1 & APP. 3)
MINOR TOTAL
Σ (APP. 2 & APP. 4)
100% VOLUME
WARRANT MET
LOCATION:County Rd E at Old Snelling Avenue Page 2
COUNTY:Ramsey
REF. POINT:
DATE:7/9/2018
OPERATOR:Mallori
Is a traffic control signal justified?No
Amount of correctible crashes:2
Right-Turn
Left-Turn
Right-Angle 2
Other
Is there a need to control left-turn conflicts?Yes
Is there a need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near a high pedestrian generator?No
Are there sight issues (inability to see conflicting traffic) at the intersection?No
Yes
Notes/explanations:
Other warrants met?
Is the intersection between two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating
characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection?
OTHER WARRANTS
Yes (,Left-Turn
Conflicts,Operational
APPENDIX E
SYNCHRO/RODEL Operations Results
Table E1. 2018 Existing AM MOEs
Table E2. 2018 Existing PM MOEs
Table E3. 2018 Study No Build AM MOEs
Table E4. 2018 Study No Build PM MOEs
Table E5. 2018 Study Build MOEs
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 14 23 23 60 5 9 4 A A A 6 A NB 7 26 230 21 40
WB 15 187 239 441 6 11 6 A B A 8 A WB 8 27 1000 37 79 34 77 200
SB 242 73 39 354 8 11 5 A B A 8 A SB 48 86 200 37 67
EB 28 103 8 139 6 8 4 A A A 7 A EB 14 38 70 30 60
LOS by
MovementAppr
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)Appr Right-Turn
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn
Intersection
ControlLocation
ThroughForecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
8 A
All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 7 11 12 30 6 11 4 A B A 7 A NB 4 25 230 14 32
WB 32 148 345 525 8 12 8 A B A 9 A WB 15 39 1000 33 68 52 110 200
SB 245 81 26 352 10 12 5 B B A 10 B SB 57 126 200 39 77
EB 60 311 19 390 11 15 12 B C B 14 B EB 34 94 70 77 199
Intersection
Appr
ControlLocation Appr
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn Through Right-Turn
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)
Forecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
LOS by
Movement
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E 11 B
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 15 25 15 55 5 11 6 A B A 8 A NB 8 22 230 21 53
WB 15 215 360 590 9 15 9 A C A 11 B WB 8 27 1000 49 111 56 139 200
SB 430 95 35 560 16 14 8 C B A 15 C SB 96 200 200 44 124
EB 25 125 10 160 9 11 6 A B A 10 B EB 13 55 70 35 91
12 B
All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)Appr Right-Turn
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn
Intersection
ControlLocation
ThroughForecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
LOS by
MovementAppr
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 10 15 20 45 8 15 9 A C A 11 B NB 6 22 230 21 56
WB 45 235 365 645 12 21 12 B C B 15 C WB 21 62 1000 64 154 68 147 200
SB 380 130 30 540 74 40 33 F E D 64 F SB 168 224 200 237 606
EB 90 360 25 475 43 56 51 E F F 53 F EB 77 95 70 229 460
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)
Forecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
LOS by
Movement
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E 41 E
Intersection
Appr
ControlLocation Appr
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn Through Right-Turn
L T R Total Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Feet
NB 15 25 15 55 5 A 5 A 100
WB 15 215 360 590 7 A 7 A 125
SB 430 95 35 560 8 A 8 A 25
EB 25 125 10 160 5 A 5 A 0
NB 10 15 20 45 5 A 5 A 25
WB 45 235 365 645 8 A 8 A 150
SB 380 130 30 540 8 A 8 A 125
EB 90 360 25 475 10 B 10 B 125
7 A
LOS By Part of
Approach
Entry
Intersection
Appr
Roundabout50%
95%
Queues
Confidence
Level
PM Peak 8 A
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)ControlPeak
Hour
RoundaboutAM Peak50%
Volumes
Table E6. 2038 No Build AM MOEs
Table E7. 2038 No Build PM MOEs
Table E8. 2038 Build MOEs
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 17 28 17 62 6 12 6 A B A 9 A NB 7 22 230 24 53
WB 17 238 398 653 9 17 10 A C B 13 B WB 9 24 1000 57 137 63 153 200
SB 475 105 39 619 32 18 12 D C B 28 D SB 149 223 200 102 374
EB 28 138 11 177 10 11 7 B B A 11 B EB 15 57 70 38 94
LOS by
MovementAppr
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)Appr Right-Turn
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn
Intersection
ControlLocation
ThroughForecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
19 C
All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E
L T R Total L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage Ave
Queue
Max
Queue Storage
NB 11 17 22 50 8 16 9 A C A 11 B NB 7 26 230 23 50
WB 50 260 403 713 12 28 13 B D B 18 C WB 22 59 1000 84 216 80 190 200
SB 420 144 33 597 158 109 98 F F F 143 F SB 207 225 200 628 1206
EB 99 398 28 525 175 187 182 F F F 184 F EB 86 95 70 742 1343
Intersection
Appr
ControlLocation Appr
Average & Maximum Traffic Queueing (feet)
Left-Turn Through Right-Turn
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)
Forecast Volumes Total Delay by
Movement
LOS by
Movement
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)All-Way Stop1: Old Snelling Ave &
County Rd E 104 F
L T R Total Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Feet
NB 17 28 17 62 5 A 5 A 150
WB 17 238 398 653 8 A 8 A 150
SB 475 105 39 619 10 B 10 B 25
EB 28 138 11 177 5 A 5 A 0
NB 11 17 22 50 6 A 6 A 25
WB 50 260 403 713 10 B 10 B 175
SB 420 144 33 597 10 B 10 B 150
EB 99 398 28 525 13 B 13 B 175Roundabout50%
95%
Queues
Confidence
Level
PM Peak 11 B
LOS by
Intersection
(Sec/Veh)
LOS by
Approach
(Sec/Veh)ControlPeak
Hour
RoundaboutAM Peak50%
Volumes
8 A
LOS By Part of
Approach
Entry
Intersection
Appr
APPENDIX C
Geotechnical Report
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax
MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Blomstrom, PE (Lic. MN, TX)
FROM: Hector Flores, PE (Lic. MN, MI, IN, ND)
DATE: October 7, 2020
RE: Old Snelling Avenue Geotechnical Recommendations
SEH No. 152489 14.00
The purpose of this memorandum is to document the results of the subsurface investigation and provide
geotechnical recommendations for the Old Snelling Avenue reconstruction project in Arden Hills,
Minnesota. The following paragraphs discuss the project background, subsurface investigation, existing
pavement conditions, existing subsurface conditions, groundwater conditions, and geotechnical
recommendations for design and construction of the project.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The project is located along Old Snelling Avenue between Snelling Avenue N (TH 51) and County Road
E (CSAH 15/149) in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The project consists of reconstructing the existing street. It is
assumed that the roadway will consist of Hot Mixed Asphalt (HMA). In addition to the roadway, the project
may include construction of a storm sewer system as well as watermain and sanitary sewer work.
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Subsurface Investigation
The subsurface investigation for this project was performed by Northern Technologies, LLC (NTI) of Inver
Grove Heights, Minnesota. The drilling program for the subsurface investigation and laboratory testing
program were developed by SEH geotechnical staff. The geotechnical data report (GDR) No.
19.MSP09107.000 prepared by NTI dated November 7, 2019 for the subsurface investigation is attached
to this memorandum. The subsurface investigation consisted of fifteen (15) SPT soil borings using a
hollow stem auger and standard penetration test (SPT) sampling every 2.5 feet along the existing streets
and at Freeway Park located in the southeast quadrant of the Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E
(CSAH 15) intersection. The borings terminate at a depth of 14.5 feet. Laboratory tests consist of
moisture content tests, Atterberg Limits tests, and mechanical sieve tests, and R-Value tests.
PAVEMENT CONDITIONS
Existing pavement measured during the subsurface investigation was identified as bituminous over
aggregate base in borings B-1 through B-13. Borings B-1 through B-7 and B-11 encountered bituminous
pavement under the aggregate base. Table 1 summarizes the pavement thicknesses measured at each
boring. The total pavement section (including aggregate base) thickness varies between 17 to 29 inches
and the average thickness is 24 inches.
Old Snelling Avenue Geotechnical Recommendations
October 7, 2020
Page 2
Table 1 – Pavement Thickness
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Fill was encountered below existing grade in all borings with the exception of Boring B-10. The fill varied
in depth from 1.5 feet to 11.5 feet below the surface. The fill was typically classified as clayey sand (SC).
Sometimes the fill is described as having trace organics, trace gravel, and/or pieces of bituminous
pavement. Underlying the fill is glacial till typically classified as clayey sand (SC) and sandy lean clay
(CL). The fines content varied between 41% to 62% for the samples tested in glacial till. Borings B-1,
through B-3 and B-5 terminate in glacial outwash typically classified as poorly graded sand (SP). The top
of the sand is between 7 to 11.5 feet below the surface. Boring B-8 encountered a layer of peat between
the fill and the glacial till at a depth of 7 to 9 feet. The peat is described as rather stiff with trace gravel
and a moisture content of 235%.
Apparent hydrocarbon odor was detected and documented at some samples in a majority of the borings
during drilling. The apparent odor was documented in the boring logs. The odor was encountered in the
samples from the fill, glacial till, and glacial outwash. This memorandum only addresses the geotechnical
recommendations for the project. It is recommended to consult with qualified personnel to provide
recommendations with respect to contaminated soil or groundwater.
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Groundwater was observed at borings B-1 and B-12 during drilling operations at a depth of 14 feet below
the surface. The groundwater elevation at B-1 is 878 feet and 900 feet at B-12. It was assumed that the
groundwater at B-12 is perched and that the groundwater elevation across the site will be at the Lake
Johanna surface water elevation.
Groundwater depths recorded during drilling can be unreliable because of the short time period of the
observation. In silty, clayey, or organic soils, longer duration observations within the borehole are typically
necessary to obtain a more accurate measurement of the water table. Perched water and fluctuation of
the groundwater elevation should be expected during periods of precipitation and snow melt above clay
Boring
Top
Pavement
Thickness
(in.)
Aggregate
Base
Thickness
(in.)
Bottom
Pavement
Thickness
(in.)
Total
Pavement
Thickness
(in.)
B-1 3 9 7 19
B-2 3 8 10 21
B-3 7 11 6 24
B-4 3 17 8 28
B-5 3 11 8 22
B-6 5 13 9 27
B-7 4 11 11 26
B-8 4.5 24 0 28.5
B-9 5 24 0 29
B-10 4.5 20 0 24.5
B-11 3 10 9 22
B-12 4.5 20 0 24.5
B-13 11 6 0 17
Old Snelling Avenue Geotechnical Recommendations
October 7, 2020
Page 3
soils. It is recommended to control potential surface water runoff that may occur due to precipitation or
snow melt as this may impact construction and compaction of embankment soils.
ROADWAY RECOMMENDATIONS
Pavement Section
Pavement design was performed for Old Snelling Avenue N. From Table 1, the average pavement
section thickness is 24 inches with bituminous pavement under the aggregate base from borings B-1
through B-7. For Pavement design purposes, it was assumed that the proposed pavement section for Old
Snelling Avenue would be comprised of bituminous pavement over aggregate base on existing fill rather
than the existing bituminous pavement or aggregate base. It is understood that a full depth reclamation
(FDR) of the existing pavement and base will be performed. The FDR will use the recycled material as a
base for new bituminous pavement. It is recommended that the recycled material used as a base during
the FDR be in accordance with Class 5 base for recycled materials (MnDOT 3138.2.E(2)).
ESALs were estimated using traffic data from MnDOT. The traffic data and ESAL estimates are attached
to this memorandum. R-value results from the geotechnical investigation were used as part of the
pavement design. The R-value results are attached to this memorandum. The average R-value used in
the pavement design was 36 with a standard deviation of 22. Pavement design was performed using
MnPAVE-Flexible. The pavement design results are attached to this memorandum. Table 2 summarizes
the recommended pavement sections.
Table 2 – Recommended Pavement Section
WATERMAIN RECOMMENDATIONS
Watermain Pipe Backfill
Watermain segments are proposed to be installed at a nominal depth of 7 to 8 feet below finished grade
using and open cut trench. The trench is recommended to extend a minimum of 12 inches below the
bottom of the pipe.
Backfill around the pipe is recommended to conform to Select Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.2).
Place backfill in lifts of not more than 6 inches thick from the bottom of the trench to a minimum of 12
inches from the top of the pipe and compact to a minimum 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry
density. Project specifications are recommended to include material testing provisions such as gradation
and Standard Proctor tests for all sources of backfill.
Trench Backfill
Excavated trench material free of organics, deleterious debris, and contamination may be suitable for
reuse as trench backfill. However, these materials may be wet and not suitable for immediate backfilling.
The material may require spreading, disking, and/or other methods to dry it out in order to meet moisture
requirements for acceptable compaction. Adequate space and time will be required at the project site to
segregate unsuitable material from the soil and conduct material drying activities. If wet excavated
material cannot be prepared for reuse as trench backfill, replacement backfill will be required. The
replacement backfill is recommended to meet the criteria of Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.1). Place
trench backfill in loose lifts of 8 inches or less from 12 inches from the top of the pipe to the bottom of the
aggregate base. Compact the trench backfill to a minimum 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry
Roadway Aggregate
Base (in.)
Bituminous
Pavement
(in.)
Old Snelling Avenue 8 4
Old Snelling Avenue Geotechnical Recommendations
October 7, 2020
Page 4
density. Project specifications are recommended to include material testing provisions such as gradation
and Standard Proctor tests for all sources of trench backfill.
Soil Correction
Soil correction is recommended for watermain in the vicinity of Boring B-8. Peat is recorded in the logs
between depths of 7 to 9 feet. A very loose layer of clayey sand (SC) underlies the peat. It is
recommended to excavate and remove all organic soils including peat as well as the very loose soil layer
below the watermain to a minimum depth of 11 feet below the ground surface and backfill with Select
Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.2) prior to installation of the watermain. Compact the backfill to a
minimum 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density.
A Type VI geotextile (MnDOT 3733) is recommended to be installed in conjunction with soil correction to
a depth below the bottom of the peat in lieu of the soil correction to a depth of 11 feet below the ground
surface.
STORM SEWER RECOMMENDATIONS
Storm sewer pipe and structures are recommended to be bedded on a minimum of 6 inches of Select
Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.2). Structures installed deeper than 5 feet from finished grade are
recommended to be bedded on a minimum of 12 inches of Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.2).
Backfill for proposed storm sewer pipe is recommended to conform to Select Granular Borrow (MnDOT
3149.2B.2). Place backfill in lifts of not more than 6 inches thick from the bottom of the trench to a
minimum of 6 inches from the top of the pipe. Compact the trench backfill to a minimum 95% of the
Standard Proctor maximum dry density. Project specifications are recommended to include material
testing provisions such as gradation and Standard Proctor tests for all sources of backfill.
See Watermain Recommendations section for trench backfill recommendations.
SANITARY SEWER RECOMMENDATIONS
It was assumed that sanitary sewer pipe and structures are to be installed at a depth of 10 to 12 feet
below finished grade using and open cut trench. The trench is recommended to extend a minimum of 12
inches below the bottom of the pipe.
Backfill around the pipe is recommended to conform to Select Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B.2).
Place backfill in lifts of not more than 6 inches thick from the bottom of the trench to a minimum of 12
inches from the top of the pipe and compact to a minimum 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry
density. Project specifications are recommended to include material testing provisions such as gradation
and Standard Proctor tests for all sources of backfill.
See Watermain Recommendations section for trench backfill recommendations.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
Depending on weather and season, dewatering may be required for subgrade and utility excavations
along the project. Project specifications are recommended to require a written Dewatering Plan to be
submitted by the contractor prior to commencing any excavation work.
Excavations are recommended to be in accordance with OSHA 29CFR Parts 1926.650 through
1926.652.
Old Snelling Avenue Geotechnical Recommendations
October 7, 2020
Page 5
Apparent hydrocarbon odor was detected and documented at some samples in a majority of the borings
during drilling. The apparent odor was documented in the boring logs. The odor was encountered in the
samples from the fill, glacial till, and glacial outwash. This memorandum only addresses the geotechnical
recommendations for the project. It is recommended to consult with qualified personnel to provide
recommendations with respect to contaminated soil or groundwater.
HDF
Attached: Geotechnical Data Report
Traffic Data
ESAL Spreadsheet
Pavement design results
cc: Justin Bergerson (SEH)
s:\ae\a\arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\50-final-dsgn\45-geo\recommendations\old snelling ave geo recommendations - update.docx
FACTUAL
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills
Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Prepared For:
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
November 7, 2019
City of Arden Hills
Attention: Mr. Todd Blomstrom
1245 West Highway 96
Arden hills, Minnesota 55112
Subject: Factual Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Dear Mr. Blomstrom,
In accordance with your request and subsequent authorization, Northern Technologies, LLC (NTI)
conducted a Geotechnical Exploration for the above referenced project. Our services included the
advancement of exploration borings and preparation of a factual engineering report. Our work was
performed in general accordance with our proposal dated September 12, 2019.
Soil samples obtained at the site will be held for 60 days at which time they will be discarded. Please
advise us in writing if you wish to have us retain them for a longer period. You will be assessed an
additional fee if soil samples are retained beyond 60 days.
We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project. If there are any questions
regarding the soils explored or our review and recommendations, please contact us at your
convenience at (651) 389-4191.
Northern Technologies, LLC
Richard S. Jett, E.I.T.
Staff Engineer
Debra A. Schroeder, P.E.
Senior Engineer
RSJ/das
I hereby certify that this plan,
specification, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a Duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the Laws of the State of
Minnesota.
Debra A. Schroeder
Date: 11/07/2019 Reg. No. 52743
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Site / Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Exploration Scope .................................................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Groundwater Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 2
2.4 Laboratory Test Program ....................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 CLOSURE .............................................................................................................................................. 3
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Page 1 of 3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site / Project Description
It is our understanding the project will consist of improvements to the existing Old Snelling Avenue
between County Road E and Snelling Avenue North in Arden Hills, Minnesota.
1.2 Scope of Services
The purpose of this factual report is to present a summary of our geotechnical exploration and provide
the soil conditions encountered at the project area. Our “scope of services” was limited to the
following:
1.Explore the project subsurface by means of seventeen (17) Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
borings extending to depths of approximately 14.5 feet below existing grade.
2.Conduct laboratory testing as requested by a representative of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
(SEH).
3.Provide a factual geotechnical report with the results of our field and laboratory tests results.
2.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS
2.1 Exploration Scope
The field exploration was performed during a period of October 3 through 11, 2019 with the borings
advanced to depths of approximately 14.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Two (2) borings (SB-
16 and SB-17) were not completed at the requested of the client’s representative Short Elliot
Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) due to utility obstructions at the original boring locations. A representative of
SEH marked and surveyed the boring locations prior to mobilization.
The borings were performed by a two-person crew utilizing a CME 750 All Terrain Vehicle-mounted drill
rig. Samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 “Standard Test Method for
Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils.”
The boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings, or were abandoned using high solids bentonite or
neat cement grout as per appropriate local and state statutes. Minor settlement of the boreholes will
occur. Owner is responsible for final closure of the boreholes.
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Page 2 of 3
2.2 Subsurface Conditions
The soil profile generally consisted of bituminous pavement (generally ranging in thickness from 3.0 to
11.0 inches) overlaying apparent aggregate base (generally ranging in thickness from 8.0 to 24.0
inches). As an exception to this, Borings SB-14 and SB-15 encountered topsoil at the surface
(approximately 5.0 inches in thickness). In Borings SB-1 through SB-7 and Boring SB-11, an additional
bituminous pavement layer was encountered directly below the apparent aggregate base layer ranging
in thickness from 6.0 to 11.0 inches.
Apparent undocumented fill soils were encountered ranging in depths from approximately 1.5 to 11.5
feet below the existing grade. Generally, the undocumented fill soils consisted of clayey sand (SC), silty
sand (SM), and sandy lean clay to lean clay with sand (CL). As an exception, apparent undocumented
fill soils were not encountered at the Boring SB-10 location.
The glacial deposits were generally encountered extending to the termination depths of the borings
and consisted of clayey sand (SC), silty sand (SM), poorly graded sand (SP), and sandy lean clay (CL).
A paludal deposit generally consisted of peat (Pt) soil was encountered at the Boring SB-8 location
between depths of approximately 7.0 and 9.0 feet below existing grade.
Apparent hydrocarbon odors (detected by human perception only) were observed throughout the
project area.
Please refer to the boring logs within the appendices for a detailed description and depths of stratum at
each boring. Additional comment on the evaluation of recovered soil samples is presented within the
report attachments.
2.3 Groundwater Conditions
The drill crew observed the borings for groundwater (if any) during and at the completion of drilling
activities. Measurable groundwater was observed in two (2) of the fifteen (15) SPT borings (SB-1 and
SB-12) at a depth of approximately 14.0 feet below existing grade (approximate elevations of 877.76
and 900.23 feet). Possible perched groundwater conditions were observed at Boring SB-6 at a depth of
approximately 11.5 feet (approximately elevation 901.01 feet)
The site soils were conducive to movement of groundwater both laterally and vertically over time. The
moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other
regional dependent conditions may produce groundwater entry of project excavations.
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
Page 3 of 3
2.4 Laboratory Test Program
The soil classifications are based upon our interpretation of the standard penetration test (SPT)
resistance determined while sampling soils, laboratory test results, and experience with similar soils
from other sites near the project. The results of such tests are summarized on the boring logs.
3.0 CLOSURE
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any
environmental or biological assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants,
hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such
contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
This factual report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Arden Hills and their agents for
specific application to the proposed Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements project in Arden Hills,
Minnesota. Northern Technologies, LLC has endeavored to comply with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practice common to the local area. Northern Technologies, LLC makes no
other warranty, expressed or implied.
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
APPENDIX A
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
GENERAL NOTES
WATER LEVEL SYMBOL
DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS
PARTICLE SIZES
CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES
We visually examined recovered soil samples to estimate distribution of grain sizes, plasticity,
consistency, moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin.
We then classified the soils according using the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488). A
chart describing this classification system and general notes explaining soil sampling procedures are
presented within appendices attachments.
The stratification depth lines between soil types on the logs are estimated based on the available
data. In-situ, the transition between type(s) may be distinct or gradual in either the horizontal or
vertical directions. The soil conditions have been established at our specific boring locations only.
Variations in the soil stratigraphy may occur between and around the borings, with the nature and
extent of such change not readily evident until exposed by excavation. These variations must be
properly assessed when utilizing information presented on the boring logs.
We request that you, your design team or contractors contact NTI immediately if local conditions
differ from those assumed by this report, as we would need to review how such changes impact our
recommendations. Such contact would also allow us to revise our recommendations as necessary to
account for the changed site conditions.
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
Soil Sampling – Standard Penetration Boring:
Soil sampling was performed according to the procedures described by ASTM D-1586. Using this
procedure, a 2 inch O.D. split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30
inches. After an initial set of six inches, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an
additional 12 inches is recorded (known as the penetration resistance (i.e. “N-value”) of the soil at
the point of sampling. The N-value is an index of the relative density of cohesionless soils and an
approximation of the consistency of cohesive soils.
Soil Sampling – Power Auger Boring:
The boring(s) was/were advanced with a 6 inch nominal diameter continuous flight auger. As a
result, samples recovered from the boring are disturbed, and our determination of the depth, extend
of various stratum and layers, and relative density or consistency of the soils is approximate.
Soil Classification:
Soil samples were visually and manually classified in general conformance with ASTM D-2488 as they
were removed from the sampler(s). Representative fractions of soil samples were then sealed within
respective containers and returned to the laboratory for further examination and verification of the
field classification. In addition, select samples were submitted for laboratory tests. Individual
sample information, identification of sampling methods, method of advancement of the samples and
other pertinent information concerning the soil samples are presented on boring logs and related
report attachments.
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
GENERAL NOTES
DRILLING and SAMPLING SYMBOLS LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS
SYMBOL DEFINITION SYMBOL DEFINITION
C.S.Continuous Sampling W Moisture content-percent of dry weight
P.D.2-3/8” Pipe Drill D Dry Density-pounds per cubic foot
C.O.Cleanout Tube LL, PL Liquid and plastic limits determined in accordance
with ASTM D 423 and D 424
3 HSA 3 ¼” I.D. Hollow Stem Auger QU Unconfined compressive strength-pounds per
square foot in accordance with ASTM D 2166-66
4 FA 4” Diameter Flight Auger
6 FA 6” Diameter Flight Auger
2 ½ C 2 ½” Casing
4 C 4” Casing
D.M.Drilling Mud Pq Penetrometer reading-tons/square foot
J.W.Jet Water S Torvane reading-tons/square foot
H.A.Hand Auger G Specific Gravity – ASTM D 854-58
NXC Size NX Casing SL Shrinkage limit – ASTM 427-61
BXC Size BX Casing Ph Hydrogen ion content-meter method
AXC Size AX casing O Organic content-combustion method
SS 2” O.D. Split Spoon Sample M.A.Grain size analysis
2T 2” Thin Wall Tube Sample C* One dimensional consolidation
SH 3” Thin Wall Tube Sample QC Triaxial Compression
* See attached data Sheet and/or graph
WATER LEVEL SYMBOL
Water levels shown on the boring logs were determined at the time and under the conditions indicated. In
sand, the indicated levels can be considered relatively reliable for most site conditions. In clay soils, it is not
possible to determine the ground water level within the normal scope of a test boring investigation, except
where lenses or layers of more pervious water bearing soil are present; and then a long period of time may be
necessary to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the position of the water level symbol for cohesive or mixed soils
may not indicate the true level of the ground water table. The available water level information is given at the
bottom of the log sheet.
DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY
RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY
TERM N60 Value (corrected) TERM N60 Value (corrected)
Very Loose 0 – 4 Soft 0-4
Loose 5 – 8 Medium 5-8
Medium Dense 9 – 16 Rather Stiff 9 – 15
Dense 16 – 30 Stiff 16 – 30
Very Dense Over 30 Very Stiff Over 30
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS PARTICLE SIZES
TERMS RANGE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION U.S. SIEVE SIZE
Trace 0 – 5% Boulders Over 3”
A little 5 – 15% Gravel Coarse 3” to ¾”
Some 15 – 30% Medium ¾” to #4
Sand Coarse #4 to #10
Medium #10 to #40
Fine #40 to #200
Silt and Clay Determined by Hydrometer Test
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
CLASSIFICATION of SOILS for ENGINEERING PURPOSES
ASTM Designation D-2487 and D2488 (Unified Soil Classification System)
Major Divisions Group
Symbol Typical Name Classification Criteria Course Grained Soils More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve * Gravels 50% or more of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve.Clean Gravels GW
Well –graded gravels and
gravel-sand mixtures, little
or no fines. Classification on basis of percentage of fines. Less than 5% passing No. 200 Sieve: GW, GP, SW, SP More than 12% passing No. 200 Sieve: GM, GC, SM, SC From 5% to 12% passing No. 200 Sieve: Borderline Classification requiring use of duel symbols. Cu = D60 / D10 greater than 4.
Cz = (D30)2 / (D10 x D60) between 1 & 3.
GP
Poorly graded gravels and
gravel-sand mixtures, little
or no fines.
Not meeting both criteria for GW materials. Gravels with Fines GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-
silt mixtures.
Atterberg limits
below “A” line, or
P.I. less than 4.
Atterberg limits
plotting in hatched
area are borderline
classifications
requiring use of dual
symbols.
GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-
clay mixtures.
Atterberg limits
above “A” line
with P.I. greater
than 7. Sands More than 50% of coarse fraction passes No 4 sieve.Clean SandsSW
Well-graded sands and
gravelly sands, little or no
fines.
Cu = D60 / D10 greater than 6.
Cz = (D30)2 / (D10 x D60) between 1 & 3.
SP
Poorly-graded sands and
gravelly sands, little or no
fines.
Not meeting both criteria for SW materials. Sands with Fines SM Silty sands, sand-silt
mixtures.
Atterberg limits
below “A” line, or
P.I. less than 4.
Atterberg limits
plotting in hatched
area are borderline
classifications
requiring use of dual
symbols.
SC Clayey sands, sand-clay
mixtures.
Atterberg limits
above “A” line
with P.I. > 7. Fine Grained Soils More than 50% passes No. 200 sieve * Silts and Clays Liquid Limit of 50% or less ML
Inorganic silts, very fine
sands, rock flour, silty or
clayey fine sands.
CL
Inorganic clays of low to
medium plasticity, gravelly
clays, sandy clays, silty
clays, lean clays.
OL Organic silts and organic
silty clays of low plasticity. Silts and Clays Liquid Limit greater than 50%. MH
Inorganic silts, micaceous
or diatomaceous fine sands
or silts, elastic silts.
CH Inorganic clays of high
plasticity, fat clays.
OH Organic clays of medium to
high plasticity. Highly Organic Soils Pt Peat, muck and other
highly organic soils. Plasticity Index Chart0102030405060010 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid LimitPlasticity LimitChart for classification of fine grained soils and the fin fraction of coarse grained soils.Atterberg Limits plotting in hatched area are borderline classifications requiring use of dual symbols.OH & MH SoilsCH SoilsCL SoilsOL & ML Soils"A" LineCL-ML Soils
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
APPENDIX B
GROUNDWATER ISSUES
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
GROUNDWATER ISSUES
The following presents additional comment and soil specific issues related to measurement of
groundwater conditions at your project site.
Note that our groundwater measurements, or lack thereof, will vary depending on the time allowed
for equilibrium to occur in the borings. Extended observation time was not available during the
scope of the field exploration program and, therefore, groundwater measurements as noted on the
borings logs may or may not accurately reflect actual conditions at your site.
Seasonal and yearly fluctuations of the ground water level, if any, occur. Perched groundwater may
be present within sand and silt lenses bedded within cohesive soil formations. Groundwater typically
exists at depth within cohesive and cohesionless soils.
We anticipate that a system of sump pits and pumps located outside of the foundation areas would
be suitable for control if perched groundwater were to be encountered. If excavations are advanced
into a static groundwater table within an underlying granular soil layer a well point system would
likely be a more suitable method of control. NTI cautions that such seepage may be heavy and will
vary based on seasonal and annual precipitation, and ground related impacts in the vicinity of the
project.
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project No. 19.MSP09107.000
APPENDIX C
BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM
SOIL BORING LOGS
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Boring Location Diagram
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
NTI Project #: 19.MSP09107.000
NOTE: Boring locations are approximate.
SB-2
SB-12
Completed Soil Borings:
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
3-4-5
(9)
4-4-4
(8)
4-5-9
(14)
5-6-8
(14)
5-5-5
(10)
4-5-5
(10)
0.3
1.0
1.6
7.0
14.5
891.5
890.8
890.2
884.8
877.3
2.8
2.0
17
15
2
39
56
56
50
67
67
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (9.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (7.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist to saturated, medium dense,
trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 5.
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING 14.00 ft / Elev 877.76 ft
GROUND ELEVATION 891.76 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 190820.866
Easting: 557685.349
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-1
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-5-7
(12)
2-3-4
(7)
2-4-4
(8)
6-7-8
(15)
5-5-5
(10)
5-9-6
(15)
0.3
0.9
1.8
4.0
6.5
9.0
11.5
13.0
14.5
903.1
902.4
901.6
899.3
896.8
894.3
891.8
890.3
888.8
4.3
2.0
3.0
12
14
21
14
11
67
56
44
56
56
61
35
41
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (8.0 inches)
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (10.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark gray to brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel, trace organics
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 5.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) reddish brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, medium dense, little gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 903.32 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 191221.576
Easting: 557680.229
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-2
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-5-5
(10)
5-8-8
(16)
5-11-13
(24)
4-8-9
(17)
4-7-8
(15)
5-6-7
(13)
0.6
1.5
2.0
9.0
11.5
14.5
914.0
913.1
912.6
905.6
903.1
900.1
13
13
13
39
56
39
56
56
72
36
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (7.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (11.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (6.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel, occasional slag pieces
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to
medium grained, moist, dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 914.559 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 191613.151
Easting: 557676.552
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-3
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-5-6
(11)
4-3-3
(6)
2-3-4
(7)
3-3-4
(7)
2-6-4
(10)
4-5-5
(10)
0.3
1.7
2.3
6.5
14.5
911.0
909.6
909.0
904.8
896.8
2.0
1.5
2.0
12
15
17
16
16
18
61
56
61
56
56
56
49
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (17.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (8.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown to light brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 3.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, loose to medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 5.
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 6.
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 7.
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 911.282 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 192057.746
Easting: 557614.507
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-4
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
12
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
3-3-3
(6)
5-5-6
(11)
4-5-7
(12)
6-8-8
(16)
5-6-6
(12)
6-7-7
(14)
0.3
1.2
1.8
6.5
11.5
14.5
907.4
906.5
905.8
901.2
896.2
893.2
212.8
16
18
14
15 33
56
61
67
61
50
56
48
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (11.0 inches)
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (8.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel, occasional root pieces
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 3.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Outwash)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 907.661 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 192421.354
Easting: 557495.347
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-5
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
2-3-4
(7)
2-4-5
(9)
4-5-5
(10)
6-7-8
(15)
1-2-2
(4)
3-5-7
(12)
0.4
1.5
2.3
6.5
9.0
11.5
13.0
14.5
912.2
911.1
910.3
906.1
903.6
901.1
899.6
898.1
2.3
14
17
13
16
26
15
67
67
50
56
61
67
39
54
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (5.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (13.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (9.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark brown to brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
SILTY SAND, (SM) dark brown, fine to medium grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 5.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, (CL) light brown, wet, soft, trace
gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Possible perched water at 11.5 feet
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 7.
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 912.597 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 192795.817
Easting: 557367.613
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-6
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-4-5
(9)
2-3-4
(7)
2-3-3
(6)
2-2-4
(6)
2-3-4
(7)
5-6-7
(13)
0.3
1.3
2.2
4.0
6.5
9.0
14.5
927.3
926.4
925.5
923.7
921.2
918.7
913.2
1.8
1.5
2.0
16
11
20
22
16
16
56
50
39
50
61
89
50
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (4.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (11.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (11.0 inches)
SANDY LEAN CLAY, (CL) gray, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
SILTY SAND, (SM) light gray, fine to medium grained,
moist, trace gravel, trace organics
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 3.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light gray, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) gray to light brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, loose to medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 927.652 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 193198.221
Easting: 557231.811
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-7
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
2-3-4
(7)
3-4-4
(8)
4-4-5
(9)
1-1-2
(3)
2-2-3
(5)
4-5-6
(11)
0.4
2.4
4.0
7.0
9.0
13.0
14.5
935.9
933.9
932.3
929.3
927.3
923.3
921.8
0.3
0.5
2.0
13
16
235
24
20
18
61
50
67
56
67
72
48
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (4.5 Inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (24.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) gray to brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel, trace organics
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 2.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) gray, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
PEAT, (Pt) dark brown, moist, rather stiff, trace gravel
(Paludal Deposit)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) gray, fine to coarse grained,
moist, very loose to loose, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 936.276 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 193559.947
Easting: 557106.498
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-8
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-5-5
(10)
2-3-4
(7)
6-8-9
(17)
5-8-9
(17)
4-6-6
(12)
4-6-7
(13)
0.4
2.4
4.0
14.5
938.1
936.1
934.5
924.0
3.5
2.8
3.0
6
13
15
14
14
15
67
83
83
94
89
100
48
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (5.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (24.0 inches)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 1.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown to dark brown, fine to
coarse grained, moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, loose to dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/3/19 COMPLETED 10/3/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 938.514 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 193885.387
Easting: 556995.16
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-9
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
16
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-4-4
(8)
3-4-5
(9)
3-5-7
(12)
3-5-7
(12)
3-5-7
(12)
3-5-6
(11)
0.4
2.0
4.0
14.5
932.4
930.7
928.7
918.2
24
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.8
21
15
14
15
15
15
4061
89
67
83
78
67
39
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (4.5 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (20.0 inches)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, (CL) reddish brown, moist,
medium, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/4/19 COMPLETED 10/4/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 932.734 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 194253.214
Easting: 556862.81
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-10
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
2-3-4
(7)
3-3-3
(6)
2-2-2
(4)
2-2-3
(5)
6-7-8
(15)
3-6-7
(13)
0.3
1.1
1.8
4.0
9.0
13.0
14.5
916.4
915.6
914.8
912.6
907.6
903.6
902.1
2.5
2.0
0.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
15
18
22
17
16
15
0
78
89
56
94
67
62
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (3.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (10.0 inches)
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (9.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: No recovery in Sample No. 2. Auger cuttings
sampled.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, (CL) gray, fine to medium
grained, moist, medium to soft, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown to gray, fine to coarse
grained, moist, loose to medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/4/19 COMPLETED 10/4/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 916.647 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 194728.33
Easting: 556701.573
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-11
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
14
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
2-2-2
(4)
2-2-3
(5)
2-3-4
(7)
3-4-4
(8)
5-3-3
(6)
3-4-4
(8)
0.4
2.0
6.5
11.5
14.5
913.9
912.2
907.7
902.7
899.7
19
1.0
33
22
17
15
17
33
61
22
22
67
22
67
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (4.5 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (20.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) black, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel, occasional organics
(Undocumented Fill)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, (CL) black, moist, trace
gravel, occasional organics
(Undocumented Fill)
NOTE: Apparent hydrocarbon odor detected (by human
perception only) in Sample No. 4.
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) gray, fine to coarse grained,
moist, loose, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/4/19 COMPLETED 10/4/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING 14.00 ft / Elev 900.23 ft
GROUND ELEVATION 914.234 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 194550.929
Easting: 556509.907
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-12
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
4-5-5
(10)
4-4-5
(9)
3-4-6
(10)
4-5-6
(11)
4-6-5
(11)
5-6-6
(12)
0.9
1.4
2.0
5.0
14.5
932.5
932.0
931.4
928.4
918.9
1.3
2.3
2.8
1.8
2
10
19
16
16
16
17
83
100
100
89
100
100
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (11.0 inches)
APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE (6.0 inches)
SILTY SAND, (SM) dark brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel, occasional bituminous pieces
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown to gray, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel, occasional bituminous
pieces
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) light brown to light gray, fine to
coarse grained, moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/11/19 COMPLETED 10/11/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater observed
GROUND ELEVATION 933.413 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 194543.628
Easting: 557032.789
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-13
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
1-1-2
(3)
2-2-3
(5)
3-4-5
(9)
3-6-8
(14)
3-6-8
(14)
3-6-9
(15)
0.4
4.0
14.5
931.5
928.0
917.5
1.0
1.8
2.5
21
18
16
17
15
18
89
67
89
83
83
22
48
TOPSOIL (5.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, trace gravel
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, loose to medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/4/19 COMPLETED 10/4/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 931.958 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)Northing: 194435.63
Easting: 556903.889
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-14
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
2-3-6
(9)
3-4-6
(10)
6-7-8
(15)
4-6-8
(14)
4-5-7
(12)
4-6-6
(12)
0.4
1.5
6.5
14.5
935.3
934.2
929.2
921.2
2.5
3.0
3.3
3.3
16
16
14
14
14
14
44
83
83
94
94
89
43
TOPSOIL (5.0 inches)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) dark brown, fine to coarse
grained, moist, trace gravel, trace organics
(Undocumented Fill)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
CLAYEY SAND, (SC) brown, fine to coarse grained,
moist, medium dense, trace gravel
(Glacial Till)
DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A
LOGGED BY Drew Faherty CHECKED BY Deb Schroeder
DATE STARTED 10/4/19 COMPLETED 10/4/19
DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS:
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---FROST DEPTH (ft)---CAVE IN (ft)---
NOTES Elevations provided by SEH, Inc.
HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in.
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- No Groundwater Observed
GROUND ELEVATION 935.736 feet
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
PLASTICLIMITGRAPHICLOGDEPTH(ft)0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5 SAMPLE TYPENUMBERBLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)PLASTICITYINDEXPOCKET PEN.(tsf)MOISTURECONTENT (%)LIQUIDLIMITRECOVERY %(RQD)FINESDRY UNIT WT.(pcf)MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-15
PROJECT LOCATION Arden Hills, Minnesota
CLIENT City of Arden Hills
PROJECT NUMBER 19.MSP09107.000
PROJECT NAME Old Snelling Avenue Roadway Improvements
NTI LOG - NORTHING & EASTING - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 12:52 - R:\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Avenue East
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076
P: 651-389-4191
www.NTIgeo.com
TEST SPECIMEN 1 2 3 4 R-VALUE
(240 psi)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)8.7 7.9 7.0
DENSITY (pcf)125.8 129.2 129.3
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psi)0.180 0.180 0.000
EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)102 355 725
R-VALUE 58 72 75 67
SOIL TYPE: Silty Sand with Gravel
LOCATION: Old Snelling Ave Roadway Improvements (19.MSPO9107.000) SB-6 at 1-5'
DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: 10/18/2019 DATE TESTED: 10/23/2019
GRAVEL:SAND:SILT AND CLAY:
LIQUID LIMIT:PLASTICITY INDEX:
R-VALUE
KUMAR & ASSOCIATES19-1-384
These test results apply to the samples which were
tested. The testing report shall not be reproduced,
except in full, without the written approval of Kumar &
Associates, Inc. R-value performed in accordance with
ASTM D2844. Atterberg limits performed in accordance
with ASTM D4318. Sieve analyses performed in
accordave with ASTM D422, D1140
90HVEEM STABILOMETER TEST RESULTS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800R-ValueEXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)
TEST SPECIMEN 1 2 3 4 R-VALUE
(240 psi)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)8.6 7.8 7.0
DENSITY (pcf)130.7 132.2 135.4
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psi)0.210 0.030 0.060
EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)176 309 444
R-VALUE 18 30 57 23
SOIL TYPE: Silty Sand with Gravel
LOCATION: Old Snelling Ave Roadway Improvements (19.MSP09107.000) SB-2 at 1-5'
DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: 10/18/2019 DATE TESTED: 10/23/2019
GRAVEL:SAND:SILT AND CLAY:
LIQUID LIMIT:PLASTICITY INDEX:
R-VALUE
KUMAR & ASSOCIATES19-1-384
These test results apply to the samples which were
tested. The testing report shall not be reproduced,
except in full, without the written approval of Kumar &
Associates, Inc. R-value performed in accordance with
ASTM D2844. Atterberg limits performed in accordance
with ASTM D4318. Sieve analyses performed in
accordave with ASTM D422, D1140
89HVEEM STABILOMETER TEST RESULTS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800R-ValueEXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)
TEST SPECIMEN 1 2 3 4 R-VALUE
(240 psi)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)9.1 8.2 7.4
DENSITY (pcf)129.6 133.7 136.8
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psi)0.180 0.060 0.150
EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)211 356 554
R-VALUE 17 24 44 18
SOIL TYPE: Silty Sand with Gravel
LOCATION: Old Snelling Ave Roadway Improvements (19.MSPO9107.000) SB-10 at 1-5'
DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: 10/18/2019 DATE TESTED: 10/23/2019
GRAVEL:SAND:SILT AND CLAY:
LIQUID LIMIT:PLASTICITY INDEX:
R-VALUE
KUMAR & ASSOCIATES19-1-384
These test results apply to the samples which were
tested. The testing report shall not be reproduced,
except in full, without the written approval of Kumar &
Associates, Inc. R-value performed in accordance with
ASTM D2844. Atterberg limits performed in accordance
with ASTM D4318. Sieve analyses performed in
accordave with ASTM D422, D1140
88HVEEM STABILOMETER TEST RESULTS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800R-ValueEXUDATION PRESSURE (psi)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y
I
N
D
E
X
CL CH
MHCL-ML
Sample Data
LIQUID LIMIT
ML
Cc:
ATTERBERG LIMITS' RESULTS
Classification
Northern Technologies, LLC
Debra Schroeder
(11/6/19)
Submitted by,
ASTM D4318
12
16
14
DEPTH
9.0
1.5
9.0
PLSAMPLE #BOREHOLE PI Fines
33
40
33
SB-5
SB-10
SB-12
21
24
19
LL
Report To:
Attention:
Old Snelling Avenue Roadway
Improvements
City of Arden Hills Project:
Project Number:
Location:
19.MSP09107.000
Arden Hills, Minnesota
ATTERBERG LIMITS - GEO - NTI-2017-09-14.GDT - 11/6/19 08:59 - \\NTI-AZ-FS01\ARCHIVES\RAMSEY\1-PROJECTS\2019 PROJECTS\OLD SNELLING AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS_GEO_19.MSP_09107.000\ENGINEERING REPORTS\GINT\OLD SNELLING.GPJInver Grove Heights
6160 Carmen Ave E
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55076
P: 651.389.4191 F: 651.389.4190
www.NTIgeo.com
Instructions: All yellow boxes require an input value.
Dropdown choices are provided for Base Year (C18), Number of Lanes (C19), and AADT Range (C20).
You must click on cells C18, C19, and C20 to access the dropdown choices.
General Information
Date
Forecast Performed by
Name of County or City
Project Number
Project Description
Route Number
Base Year (i.e. opening to traffic)2020
Number of Lanes (total both directions)2 = typical 2 lane
AADT Range Urban: >1500
Historical AADT (enter a minimum of two years)Year AADT
Enter oldest traffic data here 2017 1,600
Enter second oldest traffic data here 2040 1,980
Enter third oldest traffic data here
Enter fourth oldest traffic data here
Base Year AADT 2020 1,650
20-Year AADT 2040 1,980
35-Year AADT 2055 2,230
Growth Rate
Vehicle Class
%Flexible Rigid
2AX-6TIRE SU 1.52%0.25 0.24
3AX+SU 0.46%0.58 0.85
3AX TST 0.09%0.39 0.37
4AX TST 0.12%0.51 0.53
5AX+TST 0.89%1.13 1.89
TR TR, BUSES 0.47%0.57 0.74
TWIN TRAILERS 0.02%2.40 2.33
Total 3.57%NA NA
20-Year Flexible Forecast =161,000
20-Year Rigid Forecast =228,000
35-Year Flexible Forecast =295,000
35-Year Rigid Forecast =418,000
State Aid ESAL Traffic Forecast Calculator - 04/07/2014
For State Aid questions and information, please contact Joel Ulring (MnDOT State Aid) at 651-366-3831.
11/11/2019
HDF
Ramsey County
ARDEN - 152489
Vehicle Type ESAL Factors
1.00%
Old Snelling Avenue N
This ESAL calculator is for use with default Heavy Commerical Traffic values; click "User Defined Traffic
Values" sheet below if you wish to enter your own Heavy Commercial Traffic values.
MnPAVE Design Summary
MnPAVE 6.405 Simulation Input File: Old Snelling Ave FDR.mpv
Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70%
Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%.
Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design.
Preliminary Life Estimate 20-Year Reliability (2,500 cycles)
Fatigue FatigueRutting Rutting
>50 years >50 years 100%100%
Project Information
District County City
Metro Ramsey Arden Hills
Project Number Route Reference Post
152489 Old Snelling Ave from to
Letting Date Construction Type
12/20/19
Designer Soils Engineer
Climate Information
Seasons Location
5 45˚ 0’ Latitude, 93˚ 4’ Longitude
Structural Information (Design Level: Intermediate)
Layer Type Subtype Height (in.)
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%)PG58-34 (2360F 1/2")4.00
2 Aggregate Base FDR 8.00
3 Engineered Soil R-Value = 36 (SC)
Traffic Information (Speed = 40 mph)
Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Axle Repetitions
ESAL 7,403 1.0% (compound)163,000
Notes
Proposed pavement section for Old Snelling Ave assuming section over existing soils.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided
herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By
accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with
the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that
results from any user’s reliance on this data.
Printed Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 10:58:33
APPENDIX D
Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer Maps
FreewayParkLindey's Park
Arden OaksPark
L AKE JOHANNA BLVDSNELLING AVE NA R D E N O A K S C T
COUNT Y ROAD EPASCAL AVE NGLENAR DENRDRIDGEWOOD CTOAK AVEGLENARDEN CTSKILES LNARDEN OAKS DRFOREST LNRIDGEWOOD RDARDEN PLSIEMS CT8-143
8-142
8-147A
8-147 8-145 8-144
8-1358-136
8-123 8-124
8-129 8-128
3-055
3-056
3-052
8-146
3-013
4-011
4-010
3-0013-009
3-010 3-011
3-012
4-009
4-007
9-017
3-016
3-018
3-022
3-0233-024
3-032
3-033
3-034
3-035
3-036
3-037 3-038
3-019
3-020
4-008
4-001
4-002
4-003
4-004
4-005
4-012 4-013
4-014
4-015
4-016
4-018
8-160A
4-020
8-159
8-158
8-162
8-163
8-164
8-138
8-139
8-150
4-019
3-0443-043
3-042
3-031
3-029
3-021
3-045
9-018
9-019 9-020
9-021
9-022
8-161
8-137
8-157
8-132
8-116
8-117
8-118
8-119
8-120
8-121
8-122
8-131
8-130
8-148
4-017
8-160
8-0558-056
3-024A
3-014
3-030
3-017
Old Snelling Sanitary Sew er Replacement
0 400Feet
Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-20-0100 Old Snelling and County Road E Improvements\02 design\Prelim. Design\Sanitary Replacement.mxdSanitary Pipe
!(Sanitary ManholesSanitary ImprovementsReplacementCIPP
Lindey's Park
LAKE JOHANNA BLVD COUNT Y ROAD ESNELLING AVE NPASCAL AVE NARDEN OAKS DR
RIDGEWOOD RD
0 200Feet
Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-20-0100 Old Snelling and County Road E Improvements\02 design\Prelim. Design\Storm Improvements.mxdStorm Sewer ReplacementStorm Sewer Rehabilitation
")Catch Basin & IDsStorm Sewer Pipe
Old Snelling Storm Sewer Improvements
FreewayParkLindey's Park
COUNT Y ROAD ELAKEJOHANNABLVD
SNELLINGAVENCANNON AVEOAK AVELAMETTICIRC
U
M
MIN
G
S L
N
HAMLINE AVE NRIDGEWOODCTGLENARDEN CTS N E L LINGAVENTOCORDEBUSSARD CT
L A M E T T I L N
SKILES LN CORDETOSBSNELLINGAVENFOREST LNRIDGEWOODRDARDEN PLSIEMSCTGLENARDEN RD1036
1040
1171
1267
1268
12701274
1281
1298
1302
1303
1306
1310
1312
Old Snelling Watermain Improvements 0 400Feet
Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-20-0100 Old Snelling and County Road E Improvements\02 design\Prelim. Design\Watermain Improvements.mxdWatermain Replacement
!>Gate ValvesWatermain Pipe
!þ Hydrants
APPENDIX E
Wetland Delineation Document
BWSR NOD Form - October 2019 1
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Notice of Decision
Local Government Unit: Rice Creek Watershed District County: Ramsey
Applicant Name: City of Arden Hills Applicant Representative: Todd Blomstrom
Project Name: Old Snelling and CR E Improvements LGU Project No. (if any): 19-201R
Date Application Received by LGU: 10/10/2019
Date of LGU Decision: 8/20/2020
Date this Notice was Sent: 8/20/2020
WCA Decision Type - check all that apply
Wetland Boundary/Type Sequencing Replacement Plan Bank Plan (not credit purchase)
No-Loss (8420.0415) Exemption (8420.0420)
Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9
Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only)
Total WCA Wetland Impact Area:
Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits:
☐ Bank Credits:
Bank Account Number(s):
Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any)
Approve Approve w/Conditions Deny No TEP Recommendation
A joint application for wetland boundary/type was provided by SEH Inc. on 10/10/2019. Site visits were
attended on 10/24/2019 and 10/31/2019 by representatives from BWSR and RCWD. The TEP noted that a
another wetland boundary/type application for the same survey area was previously approved on 2/13/2019
(RCWD #18-163R) and, with the exception of Wetland 8, the wetlands boundaries delineated under the
18-163R application remained valid and accurate. The TEP found that due to recent work within Wetland 8
under RCWD After-the-Fact Permit 18-089, wetland characteristics may be masked, and recommended that
boundary adjustments should reflect the recent grading. An updated wetland boundary map was provided by
SEH Inc. on 8/19/2020. The Statute 15.99 decision timeframe was extended three times and waived by the
applicant on 6/3/2020.
LGU Decision
Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 Approved1 Denied
List Conditions: The applicant needs to submit a survey of the wetland boundary as well as gps points of the
wetland delineation in a form acceptable to the RCWD.
Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other:
Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify):
1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project-
specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on
the title of th e property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid.
LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1.
☒ Attachment(s) (specify): Figure 7 by SEH Inc. dated and RCWD received 8/19/2020.
☒ Summary:
The LGU finds the wetland boundaries illustrated in the attached figure titled: Figure 7 Wetland Delineation
BWSR NOD Form - October 2019 2
Results by SEH Inc. dated and RCWD received 8/19/2020 accurate and supported by the submitted wetland
delineation for the LGU administration of the WCA.
This decision is not intended to define boundaries of MN DNR jurisdiction or regulate activities under the
jurisdiction of the MN DNR, except to the extent that MN DNR finds the decision consistent with their
requirements.
The LGU decision is valid for five years. However, the decision will cease to be valid before then, if the
Technical Evaluation Panel determines that the wetland boundary or type has changed due to natural or
artificial changes to the hydrology, vegetation, or soils of the area. The LGU finds that the wetland typing may
need to be reviewed in conjunction with any future project.
Advisory Note:
A Wetland Replacement Plan application must include a statement from the MnDNR, or the applicant's
licensed professional, based on MnDNR database review, as to the potential presence of an endangered or
threatened species or potential impact to a rare natural community (Minn. Rules 8420.0330, subp. 3.A(5);
8420.0525). Applicants should initiate this review early.
1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations.
Attached Project Documents
☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify):
Appeals of LGU Decisions
If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you
received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director
along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified
below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail.
The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their
representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why
the decision is in error. Send to:
Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator
Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155
travis.germundson@state.mn.us
Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision?
☒ Yes1 ☐ No
1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process.
Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable)
See RCWD Board of Managers Resolution 2019-13 regarding delegated decisions and appeal, available at
www.ricecreek.org on the Board Agendas, Minutes & Resolutions page.
Notice Distribution (include name)
Required on all notices:
SWCD TEP Member: Michael Schumann BWSR TEP Member: Ben Meyer
LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact):
DNR Representative: Melissa Collins & John Gleason
Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.:
Applicant (notice only): Todd Blomstrom (City of Arden Hills)
Agent/Consultant (notice only): Rebecca Bedhun (SHE Inc)
Optional or As Applicable:
BWSR NOD Form - October 2019 3
Corps of Engineers: Maria DeLaundreau
BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only):
Members of the Public (notice only): Other:
Signature: Date:
This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a
summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3.
08/20/20
SEH : Wetland 1
KH: Wetland E
SEH : Wetland 2
KH: Wetland F
SEH : Wetland 5
KH: Wetland D
SEH : no name
KH: Wetland C
SEH : Wetland 8
KH: no name
SEH : Wetland 9
KH: Wetland B
SEH : Wetland 10
KH: Wetland A
Figure
7
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR.
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
PHONE: (651) 490-2000
FAX: (888) 908-8166
TF: (800) 325-2055
www.sehinc.comPath: S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\3-env-stdy-regs\30-env-doc\90-wetlands\GIS\2020 Updates\Figure 7 - Delin Results.mxdWetland Delineation Results
Old Snelling and CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Project: ARDEN 152489
Print Date: 8/11/2020
Map by: rbeduhn
Projection: UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N
Source: SEH, Google
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that
the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided.
Legend
2020 Wetland Delineation Update
±
0 500250 Feet
APPENDIX F
Environmental Documents
County E Rd
Glenhill R
non
r
Project Corridor
0 1,000
Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Corridor Location
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 1,000 feet
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
County E Rd
Cu
Cannon A
EB-1 *
EB-3
EB-4
EB-5
EB-6
EB-7
EB-8 *
EB-10
EB-11
EB-9
EB-2
EB-13EB-12 *
EB-14
SV-2
SV-9
!(Environmental Boring
!(Soil Vapor Boring
Project Corridor
0 525
Feet¯Figure 2 - Environmental Boring Locations
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 525 feet
* = Groundwater sample collected
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
County E Rd
Cu
Cannon A
EB-1 *
EB-2
EB-3
EB-4
EB-5
EB-6
EB-7
EB-8 *
EB-9
EB-10
EB-11
EB-12 *
EB-13
EB-14
SV-2
SV-9
!(Environmental Boring
!(Soil Vapor Boring
Project Corridor
0 525
Feet¯Figure 3 - Analytical Exceedances
Field Investigation
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 525 feet
* = Groundwater sample collected
1,3-Butadiene 50 9.3 90
1,3-Butadiene 38 9.3 90
Naphthalene 10 28 4.5
Benzo[a]pyrene 2 3 1.4
Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 2 23 1.4
DRO 100* NE NE
Naphthalene NA 10 28 4.5
Benzo[a]pyrene 2 3 1.4
Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 2 23 1.4
DRO 100* NE NE
Table 1 - Soil Analytical ResultsOld Snelling Avenue and County Road E ImprovementsArden Hills, MNWSB Project Number: 015447-000Sample ID (Depth Interval) EB-1 (6-8) EB-1 (10-12) EB-2 (2-4) EB-2 (8-10) EB-3 (4-6) EB-3 (8-10) EB-4 (4-6) EB-4 (8-10) EB-5 (4-6) EB-5 (8-10) EB-6 (4-6) EB-6 (8-10) EB-7 (4-6) EB-7 (8-10)Sample Date 4/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Naphthalene 91-20-30.633<0.5100.585<0.314 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10 28 4.5All Other VOCs NAND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDNE NE NEPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)Acenaphthene 83-32-9<0.0565 <0.130 <0.112 <0.0560 <0.05000.310<0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 1,200 5,260 81Acenaphthylene 208-96-8<0.0565 <0.1300.212<0.0560 <0.05001.28<0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEAnthracene 120-12-7<0.0565 <0.1300.184<0.0560 <0.05001.83<0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 7,880 45,400 1,300Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3<0.0565 <0.1300.416<0.0560 <0.05005.75<0.0569 <0.01150.116<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEBenzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2<0.0565 <0.1300.930<0.05600.0571 6.66<0.0569 <0.01150.194<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEBenzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9<0.0565 <0.1300.264<0.0560 <0.05003.26<0.0569 <0.01150.0772<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEBenzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8<0.0565 <0.1300.611<0.0560 <0.05006.08<0.0569 <0.01150.149<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 2 3 1.4Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2<0.0565 <0.1300.523<0.0560 <0.05003.92<0.0569 <0.01150.111<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEChrysene 218-01-9<0.0565 <0.1300.425<0.0560 <0.05005.50<0.0569 <0.01150.118<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEDibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3<0.0565 <0.1300.133<0.0560 <0.05000.888<0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEFluoranthene 206-44-00.0837<0.1300.813<0.05600.102 15.2<0.0569 <0.01150.165 0.0845<0.01130.0122<0.0111 <0.0574 1,080 6,800 670Fluorene 86-73-7<0.0565 <0.1300.127<0.0560 <0.05000.888<0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 850 6,800 110Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5<0.0565 <0.1300.575<0.0560 <0.05004.70<0.0569 <0.01150.132<0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NE2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6<0.0565 <0.130 <0.112 <0.0560 <0.0500 <0.0981 <0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 100 369 NENaphthalene 91-20-3<0.05650.230 0.294<0.0560 <0.0500 <0.0981 <0.0569 <0.0115 <0.0567 <0.0562 <0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 10 28 4.5Phenanthrene 85-01-80.103<0.1300.769<0.0560 <0.05006.32<0.0569 <0.01150.0579<0.0562 <0.01130.0275<0.0111 <0.0574 NE NE NEPyrene 129-00-00.0583<0.1300.686<0.05600.0829 12.4<0.0569 <0.01150.140 0.0738<0.0113 <0.0115 <0.0111 <0.0574 890 5,800 440Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 50-32-80.000 0.0000.9080.0000.006 8.6690.000 0.0000.2020.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0002 23 1.4All Other Analyzed PAHs NAND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDNE NE NERCRA 8 MetalsArsenic 7440-38-2NA NA NA NA NA <3.07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 20 5.8Barium 7440-39-3NA NA NA NA NA25.0NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,100 18,000 1,680Chromium 7440-47-3NA NA NA NA NA14.6NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA44,000/87 A100,000/650 A1,000,000,000/36 ALead 7439-92-18.52<4.885.18 6.54<4.64 <4.325.20<9.35 <8.534.75 8.09<9.805.37<9.23 300 700 2,700Mercury 7439-97-6NA NA NA NA NA <0.0198 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 1.5 3.3All Other RCRA Metals NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE NEPolychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)PCBs, Total 1336-36-3NA NA NA NA NA <0.501 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.2 8 NEDiesel Range Organics (DRO)DRO STL0014367.0<8.0579.8<6.368.52 102<5.80 <5.698.32 7.53<6.85 <6.12 <6.50 <5.80100* NE NEGasoline Range Organics (GRO)GRO STL01887<11.8 <17.2 <11.8 <10.9 <10.6 <10.5 <11.8 <12.1 <10.6 <11.7 <10.4 <11.4 <11.3 <11.2100* NE NENotes:All results reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)BOLD = Concentration is greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limitND = Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limitsNA - Not Analyzed NE = Not Established< = Analyte not detected greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limit shownSRV = Soil Reference ValueSLV = Soil Leaching Value*= MPCA criteria for unregulated fillA = Vaules are for Chromium III / Chromium VIBlue = Value is greater than or equal to Tier I Residentail SRVGreen = Value is greater than or equal to Tier II Industrial SRVPink = Value is greater than or equal to Screening SLVTier I Residential SRV (mg/kg) Tier II Industrial SRV (mg/kg)Screening SLV(mg/kg)WSBCAS #Page 1 of 2
Table 1 - Soil Analytical ResultsOld Snelling Avenue and County Road E ImprovementsArden Hills, MNWSB Project Number: 015447-000Sample ID (Depth Interval) EB-8 (2-4) EB-8 (8-10) EB-9 (4-6) EB-9 (8-10) EB-10 (4-6) EB-10 (8-10) EB-11 (4-6) EB-11 (8-10) EB-12 (4-6) EB-12 (8-10) EB-13 (4-6) EB-13 (8-10) EB-14 (4-6) EB-14 (8-10)Sample Date 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020 04/17/2020Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Naphthalene 91-20-36.87 2.14NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10 28 4.5All Other VOCs NAND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDNE NE NEPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)Acenaphthene 83-32-96.65 16.1<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 1,200 5,260 81Acenaphthylene 208-96-84.71 9.00<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEAnthracene 120-12-721.0 51.0<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 7,880 45,400 1,300Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-321.6 50.7<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEBenzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-226.0 60.5<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEBenzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-910.8 21.4<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEBenzo[a]pyrene 50-32-820.4 45.3<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 2 3 1.4Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-211.5 23.6<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEChrysene 218-01-920.9 46.2<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEDibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-33.24 6.84<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEFluoranthene 206-44-077.2 185 0.0968<0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 1,080 6,800 670Fluorene 86-73-722.6 60.8<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 850 6,800 110Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-514.5 30.5<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NE2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-60.431 1.43<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 100 369 NENaphthalene 91-20-30.867 2.60<0.0578 <0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 10 28 4.5Phenanthrene 85-01-891.3 237 0.133<0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 NE NE NEPyrene 129-00-058.1 135 0.0705<0.0553 <0.0563 <0.112 <0.0115 <0.0115 <0.137 <0.0580 <0.0568 <0.0555 <0.0112 <0.0556 890 5,800 440Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) Equivalent 50-32-829.713 65.9020.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0002 23 1.4All Other Analyzed PAHs NAND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDNE NE NERCRA 8 MetalsArsenic 7440-38-2<10.84.94NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <3.91 NA NA NA 9 20 5.8Barium 7440-39-353.2 57.5NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA90.7NA NA NA 1,100 18,000 1,680Chromium 7440-47-314.4 19.6NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA15.5NA NA NA44,000/87 A100,000/650 A1,000,000,000/36 ALead 7439-92-16.30 6.29 5.02 4.91 5.64<9.524.63 5.12 7.92<4.85 <8.995.26 5.54 4.84300 700 2,700Mercury 7439-97-6<0.0223 <0.0225 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.0297NA NA NA 0.5 1.5 3.3All Other RCRA Metals NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE NEPolychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)PCBS, Total 1336-36-3<0.0567 <0.0575 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0562 NA NA NA 1.2 8 NEDiesel Range Organics (DRO)DRO STL001431160 366<5.92 <6.02 <5.07 <5.86 <6.23 <6.217.93<6.3914.0 8.21<6.76 <6.48100* NE NEGasoline Range Organics (GRO)GRO STL01887<11.6 <12.1 <10.3 <11.0 <11.9 <10.5 <12.1 <11.6 <12.3 <12.2 <10.8 <10.8 <12.1 <11.1100* NE NENotes:All results reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)BOLD = Concentration is greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limitND = Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limitsNA - Not Analyzed NE = Not Established< = Analyte not detected greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limit shownSRV = Soil Reference ValueSLV = Soil Leaching Value*= MPCA criteria for unregulated fillA = Vaules are for Chromium III / Chromium VIBlue = Value is greater than or equal to Tier I Residentail SRVGreen = Value is greater than or equal to Tier II Industrial SRVPink = Value is greater than or equal to Screening SLVWSBTier I Residential SRV (mg/kg) Tier II Industrial SRV (mg/kg)Screening SLV(mg/kg)CAS #Page 2 of 2
Table 2 - Groundwater Analytical ResultsOld Snelling Avenue and County Road E ImprovementsArden Hills, MNWSB Project Number: 015447-000Sample ID GW-1 GW-8 GW-12Water Level (ft. below grade) 9.21 7.24 5.10Sample Date 04/16/2020 04/16/2020 04/17/2020Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)All Analyzed VOCs NAND ND NDNA NARCRA 8 MetalsLead 7439-92-1300 1100 1580NE NEAll Other RCRA Metals NAND ND ND NE NEDiesel Range Organics (DRO)Diesel Range Organics (DRO) STL00143<125244 *<1251,000 ** 200Gasoline Range Organics (GRO)Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) STL01887<100 <100 <5001,000 ** 200Notes:All values reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)BOLD = Concentration is greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limit< = Analyte not detected greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limit shownND = Analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limitsNA = Not ApplicableNE = Not Established* = Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) or Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) is outside acceptance limits.** = MPCA criteria for remedial investigationBlue = Value exceeds established MDH guidance valueDischarge Limits shown are the most stringent values indicated in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Dishcharge Elimination Sysytem (NPDES)/State Disposal System document wq-wwprm9-25 dated 2/2/2017CAS #Health Based Risk Guidance Value (µg/L)WSBLimits for Contaminated Groundwater Discharges (µg/L)Page 1 of 1
Table 3 - Soil Vapor Analytical ResultsOld Snelling Avenue and County Road E ImprovementsArden Hills, MNWSB Project Number: 015447-000Sample ID SV-2 (4FT) SV-9 (4FT)Sample Date 4/16/2020 4/16/2020Benzene 71-43-233 181501,5001,3-Butadiene106-99-050 389.3902-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK))78-93-316 18170,000600,000Cyclohexane110-82-710 7.3210,000700,000Ethanol64-17-5< 94120NENEEthylbenzene 100-41-422< 8.71401,300n-Heptane142-82-533< 8.214,00047,000n-Hexane110-54-357 2624,00083,000Propylene115-07-1560 230100,000370,000Tetrachloroethene (PCE)127-18-415 201101,100Toluene (Methylbenzene)108-88-3300 37140,000470,000m&p-Xylene 179601-23-151< 223,300 b12,000 bo-Xylene 95-47-617< 8.73,300 b12,000 bAll Other Analyzed VOCsNEND NDvariousvariousNotes:All results reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3)BOLD = Concentration is greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limitND = Analyte not detected greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limitsNE = Not Established< = Analyte not detected greater than or equal to laboratory reporting limit shownISV = Intrusion Screening Valueb = Based on total xylenes CAS #1330-20-7Value is greater than or equal to 33X Residential ISVValue is greater than or equal to 33X Commercial / Industrial ISVWSBCAS #Residential 33X ISV 3) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)Commercial / Industrial 33X ISV 3) Page 1 of 1
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. R-015447-000 Figures
FIGURES
M-333
County E Rd
Glenhill
n Av
r
Project Corridor
0 1,000
Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Corridor Location
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 1,000 feet
County E Rd
Cu
a nnon Av
Project Corridor
0 500
Feet¯Figure 2 - Project Corridor Details
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 500 feet
County E Rd
Cu
a nnon Av
Project Corridor
0 500
Feet¯Figure 3 - REC Map
Phase I ESA
Old Snelling Ave & CR E Improvements
Arden Hills, MN 1 inch = 500 feet
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements
WSB Project No. 015447-000 Appendices
APPENDIX A
Photographic Documentation
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Photo 1: South end of the Project Corridor, including Bridge 62J17, facing southeast.
Photo 2: Typical view of the Project Corridor, facing north.
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Photo 3: Typical overhead powerlines and pole-mounted transformer along the western side of the
Project Corridor, facing northwest.
Photo 4: North end of the Project Corridor, facing south. Adjacent high-pressure gas main pictured on
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Photo 5: Leak Site LS0012785 located approximately 250 feet east of the Project Corridor, facing
southeast.
Photo 6: Approximate location of adjacent Site Assessment Site SA0008406, facing northeast.
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Photo 7: Approximate location of adjacent Site Assessment Site SA0008404, facing east.
Photo 8:
Project Corridor, facing east.
APPENDIX G
Area 1, Alternative 1 Schematic Drawings
Snelling Avenue North – With Trail
00+10000+10100+10200+10300+10400+10500+10600+10700+10800+109WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+10000+10100+10200+10300+10400+10500+10600+10700+10800+109℄14.00'LANE10.00'TRAILSLOPE VARIES2.0%2.0%B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER4" MIN3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #1NTS1'12.00'LANE2.0%4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIALSLOPEVARIES34.00'2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIAL10/7/2020Save: 10/7/2020 1:53 PM jbergerson Plot: 10/7/2020 1:55 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-1.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 1SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE/STH 51BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
00+10900+11000+11100+11200+11300+11400+11500+11600+11700+118WET00+10900+11000+11100+11200+11300+11400+11500+11600+11700+118℄14.00'LANE10.00'TRAILSLOPE VARIES2.0%2.0%B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER4" MIN3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #1NTS1'12.00'LANE2.0%4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIALSLOPEVARIES34.00'2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIAL10/7/2020Save: 10/7/2020 1:53 PM jbergerson Plot: 10/7/2020 1:56 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-1.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 1SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTASNELLING AVE NBUSSARD CT
LAMETTI LN
CUMMINGS
L
NLEGENDWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
00+11800+11900+12000+12100+12200+12300+12400+12500+12600+127WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+11800+11900+12000+12100+12200+12300+12400+12500+12600+127℄14.00'LANE14.00'LANE28.00'FACE-FACE10.00'TRAILSLOPE VARIES2.0%2.0%2.0%SLOPE VARIESB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIAL1'4" MIN4" MIN3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #1NTS1'10/7/2020Save: 10/7/2020 1:53 PM jbergerson Plot: 10/7/2020 1:58 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-1.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 1SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTASNELLING AVE NGLENARDEN RDSKILES LNLEGENDWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
00+12600+12700+12800+12900+13000+13100+13200+13300+13400+135WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+12600+12700+12800+12900+13000+13100+13200+13300+13400+135℄12.00'LANE12.00'LANE36.00'6.00'SHOULDER8.00'TRAILSLOPE VARIES2.0%2.0%2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIAL3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #1NTS4.0%4:16.00'SHOULDER4.0%4:12.0%1.50'1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)12" GRANULAR MATERIALSLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIES10/7/2020Save: 10/7/2020 1:53 PM jbergerson Plot: 10/7/2020 1:59 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-1.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 1SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTASKILES LNSKILES LNARDEN PLFOREST LNARDEN PLSNELLING AVE NLEGENDWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
00+13600+13700+13800+13900+14000+14100+14200+14300+14400+145WETWETWET00+13600+13700+13800+13900+14000+14100+14200+14300+14400+145℄12.00'LANE14.00'LANE34.00'FACE-FACE8.00'PARKING2.0%2.0%2.0%SLOPE VARIESB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)12" GRANULAR MATERIAL1'1'4" MIN4" MINTYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #1NTS8.00'TRAILSLOPE VARIES2.0%3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (MNDOT 3138)5.00'TRAIL5.0%10/7/2020Save: 10/7/2020 1:53 PM jbergerson Plot: 10/7/2020 2:00 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-1.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 1SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTASNELLING AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCTH E
CTH
E
/
L
A
K
E
J
O
H
A
N
N
A
B
L
V
DFREEWAYPARKLEGENDWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
APPENDIX H
Area 1, Alternative 2 Schematic Drawings
Snelling Avenue North – No Trail
00+10000+10100+10200+10300+10400+10500+10600+10700+10800+109WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+10000+10100+10200+10300+10400+10500+10600+10700+10800+109℄12.00'LANE12.00'LANE40.00'8.00'SHOULDER2.0%2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #3NTS4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER4.0%4:12.0%1.50'1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)SLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIES10/6/2020Save: 10/6/2020 4:02 PM jmeemken Plot: 10/6/2020 4:04 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-2.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 3SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE/STH 51
00+10900+11000+11100+11200+11300+11400+11500+11600+11700+118WET00+10900+11000+11100+11200+11300+11400+11500+11600+11700+118℄12.00'LANE12.00'LANE40.00'8.00'SHOULDER2.0%2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #3NTS4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER4.0%4:12.0%1.50'1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)SLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIES10/6/2020Save: 10/6/2020 4:02 PM jmeemken Plot: 10/6/2020 4:04 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-2.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 3SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSNELLING AVE NBUSSARD CT
LAMETTI LN
CUMMINGS
L
N
00+11800+11900+12000+12100+12200+12300+12400+12500+12600+127WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+11800+11900+12000+12100+12200+12300+12400+12500+12600+127℄12.00'LANE12.00'LANE40.00'8.00'SHOULDER2.0%2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #3NTS4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER4.0%4:12.0%1.50'1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)SLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIES10/6/2020Save: 10/6/2020 4:02 PM jmeemken Plot: 10/6/2020 4:04 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-2.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 3SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSNELLING AVE NGLENARDEN RDSKILES LN
00+12600+12700+12800+12900+13000+13100+13200+13300+13400+135WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET00+12600+12700+12800+12900+13000+13100+13200+13300+13400+135℄12.00'LANE12.00'LANE40.00'8.00'SHOULDER2.0%2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)TYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #3NTS4.0%4:18.00'SHOULDER4.0%4:12.0%1.50'1.50'3" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)SLOPEVARIESSLOPEVARIES10/6/2020Save: 10/6/2020 4:02 PM jmeemken Plot: 10/6/2020 4:05 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-2.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 3SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSKILES LNSKILES LNARDEN PLFOREST LNARDEN PLSNELLING AVE N
00+13600+13700+13800+13900+14000+14100+14200+14300+14400+145WETWETWET00+13600+13700+13800+13900+14000+14100+14200+14300+14400+145℄12.00'LANE14.00'LANE34.00'FACE-FACE8.00'PARKINGSLOPE VARIES2.0%2.0%2.0%SLOPE VARIESB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 - SPWEA330C2" PLANT-MIXED BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMNDOT SPEC 2360 -SPWEB340C8" AGGREGATE BASE(GENERATED FROM FULL-DEPTH PAVEMENT RECLAMATION)1'1'4" MIN4" MINTYPICAL SECTION - OPTION #3NTS10/6/2020Save: 10/6/2020 4:02 PM jmeemken Plot: 10/6/2020 4:05 PM S:\AE\A\Arden\152489\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\sheet\Snelling Ave N - Alt-2.dwg0feetscale30603015
FILE NO.DATE:PHONE: 651.490.20003535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVEST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196www.sehinc.com152489OPTION 3SNELLING AVE N IMPROVEMENTSARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTALEGENDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYBITUMINOUS SHOULDERWETLAND BOUNDARYWETPARCEL BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAYSNELLING AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCTH E
CTH
E
/
L
A
K
E
J
O
H
A
N
N
A
B
L
V
DFREEWAYPARK
APPENDIX I
Area 2, Roundabout Intersection
Schematic Drawings
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR.
PHONE: (651) 490-2000
DRAWING NO. 1
SNELLING AVE. / COUNTY RD. E
OPTION 1
ROUNDABOUT
0
feetscale
50 50 100
25
COUNTY RD. E
SNELLI
NG AVE.OLD HWY 10
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR.
PHONE: (651) 490-2000
DRAWING NO. 2
SNELLING AVE. / COUNTY RD. E
OPTION 2
ROUNDABOUT
0
feetscale
50 50 100
25
COUNTY RD. E
SNELLI
NG AVE.OLD HWY 10
APPENDIX J
Public Information and Open House Documents
Public Informational Meeting - Open House
Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements
Dear Property Owner:
The Arden Hills City Council has authorized the preparation of a feasibility study as a first step in
considering proposed improvements to Old Snelling Avenue. A project location map is provided on the
back of this page. The following potential improvements are being considered at this time:
Reconstruction of Old Snelling Avenue from County Road E to Highway 51;
Construction of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of County Road E and Old Snelling
Avenue in partnership with Ramsey County;
Construction of a pedestrian trail along Old Snelling Avenue from County Road E to Highway 51;
Replacement of watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer based on a condition assessment
currently underway.
City staff will be hosting a public informational meeting to provide information on the project and to solicit
your input on the proposed improvements. This meeting will be an open house format. You may attend
the meeting anytime between 4:30 PM and 7:00 PM at your convenience to discuss the project with City
staff.
Informational Meeting – Open House
Thursday, October 17, 2019
4:30 PM to 7:00 PM
Arden Hills City Hall Council Chambers
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
It is important to note that this project may result in an assessment to properties with driveway access
directly onto Old Snelling Avenue / Old Highway 10. An additional public informational meeting will be
conducted at a future date if the City Council determines that the project should proceed to the design
phase.
If you have any questions or cannot attend the open house meeting, please feel free to contact me at
tblomstrom@cityofardenhills.org or 651-792-7846.
Sincerely,
Todd Blomstrom, PE
Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer
Approximate
Project Boundary
Preliminary
Prelim. Concept Only
S
oldSnellingAvenueandCountyRoadElmprovements
Comments:
Return to: Todd Blomstrom, City of Arden li!l? 65t-792-7846
(tblomstrom@city;i;de;hilis.org 1, lZ+S West Highway 96, Arden Hills' MN 55LL2
City of Arden Hills ▪1245 West Highway 96 ▪ Arden Hills Minnesota 55112
Phone 651.792.7800 ▪ Fax 651.634.5137 ▪ www.cityofardenhills.org
Project Update
OLD SNELLING AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD E IMPROVEMENTS
RESCHEUDLED TO 2022 CONSTRUCTION SEASON
November 4, 2019
The City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County are in the early stages of planning for roadway
improvements along Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E. The City’s Capital Improvement
Plan identifies improvements to Old Snelling Avenue from County Road E to Highway 51 to
address deteriorated pavement conditions. The City’s capital plan and County’s transportation
improvement program also identify reconstruction of the intersection at County Road E and Old
Snelling Avenue to improve safety and traffic operations.
An open house informational meeting for the project was held on October 17, 2019 to provide an
opportunity for residents to review initial concept drawings and provide input for the project.
The open house meeting was well attended by approximately 50 people providing many valuable
questions and comments.
This project update is being sent to residents near the project area to provide information
regarding the anticipated project schedule. The project was initially planned for construction in
the 2020 or 2021 time frame. However, Ramsey County will be reconstructing Lexington
Avenue between County Road E and I-694 in 2021. Major improvements to Old Snelling
Avenue and County Road E during the same time line as construction along Lexington Avenue
would be difficult for local traffic, particularly given current road work underway along I-35W.
The Old Snelling Avenue project has been rescheduled for the 2022 construction season. This
schedule will allow additional time for planning the project and additional opportunity for public
input during the design process. The City and County will work together to align the proposed
improvements at the intersection of Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E on this same
construction schedule.
All residents are encouraged to visit the project website to stay updated on the project. The
project page is located at www.cityofardenhills.org/constructionprojects. If you have additional
questions, please contact the City Public Works Department at 651-792-7800.
1
Todd Blomstrom
From:Jolene Trauba
Sent:Monday, January 4, 2021 8:14 AM
To:Todd Blomstrom
Cc:Dave Perrault
Subject:FW: Redoing Old Snelling
-----Original Message-----
From: TED & TERRY HOXMEIER <ttkp1979@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 6:37 PM
To: AHInformation <AHInfo@metro-inet.us>
Subject: Redoing Old Snelling
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
I walk Old Snelling everyday. We do not need a walking path or a rumble lane. Just make it wide enough with clear while
lines and snow plow all the way to the ditch. That’s all we need to be safe. And enforce a speed limit.
Theresa Hoxmeier
3320 Lametti Circle
651-636-6584
Sent from my iPhone
From:Kate Olson
To:David Swearingen
Subject:Trail on old Snelling
Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:32:51 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hello
I am writing to voice my opinion on the trail on old Snelling between Snelling and cty rd e.
When I moved here from Minneapolis, I was immediately disappointed to see the lack of trails
for pedestrian safety. However was excited when I researched all the proposed trails and felt
confident that Arden hills would progress forward like all the surrounding cities and make
pedestrian safety a priority.
The trail along old Snelling is a key trail that would begin connect us to so much commerce in
Roseville. It would benefit families that live south of cty rd E to be able to feel confident thee
we it kids could bike and walk to school safely.
I understand the cost is high, but if this trail does not happen because of cost, I can only
foresee that if cost becomes the issue this time, then it will continue to be the reason and none
of the proposed trails will happen.
How do other cities manage to find money to build trails?
From:Emily Ogaard
To:David Swearingen
Subject:Snelling Ave N and Cummings Ln Project Feedback
Date:Monday, March 8, 2021 11:26:00 AM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Good Morning David,
I just watched the project presentation from February for the road improvements scheduled for
Snelling Ave N and Cummings Ln and wanted to send my input.
We live at 1399 Cummings Ln, which is the corner lot on the north intersection of Snelling
and Cummings LN. When I first learned about this project, I was thrilled at the possibility of a
trail on Snelling. We have two small children and a dog, we walk and ride bikes along
Snelling on a daily basis. While I usually feel safe, speeding cars and lack of visibility where
the road curves on Snelling makes me nervous.
The presentation made me question the trail design though. I like the wide shoulder that runs
along our property line on Snelling, a vast reduction of that shoulder - bringing cars closer to
the yards along the east side would make me even more nervous. I think I would be very
happy with Version 2, a wider west shoulder and safety improvements along the shoulders. I
also just wanted to thank the City for including Cummings Ln on this project, our street
desperately needed it.
Thank you,
Emily Peterson
651-373-3403
1
Todd Blomstrom
From:Todd Blomstrom
Sent:Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:49 PM
To:'Mike.Halleckson'
Cc:'Jamie Halleckson (jamiehalleckson@gmail.com)'
Subject:RE: Old Snelling project
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your message. I do see that the figure needs to be revised to show your driveway. The driveway location
was recorded during the field survey, but was missed on the drawing. I have walked the portion of your driveway within
the right of way and can understand your concerns.
A trail extension south of Arden Place becomes increasingly more difficult, with terrain, drainage, trees, and driveway
challenges. Sightlines at your driveway crossing would certainly be considered if the project proceeds with Alternative
1. Based on City Council comments on Monday and past work sessions, staff will be focusing on a variation of
Alternative 2, with the travel lanes shifted east by two feet and providing a 10-ft wide shoulder on the west side of
Snelling Avenue.
I have made a note of your comments in the project file. Feel free to contact me if you want to discuss this more.
Todd A. Blomstrom, PE
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
Main 651-792-7800 | Direct: 651-792-7846
From: Mike.Halleckson <Mike.Halleckson@target.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 12:58 PM
To: Todd Blomstrom <TBlomstrom@cityofardenhills.org>
Cc: 'Jamie Halleckson (jamiehalleckson@gmail.com)' <jamiehalleckson@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Old Snelling project
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi Todd-
Jamie and I appreciate all of your communication throughout the planning of this project. We listened to the update on
the project in the Arden Hills City Council meeting last night (12/21) and it sounds like the most likely option will be to
find a solution within the existing road footprint (more closely aligned to Alternative 2). There was a comment that it
would be fairly easy to add a trail from County Rd E to Arden Place due to the existing curb and from Arden Place to
Skiles Lane due to the fact that the trail would jog away from the road and not impact drainage. While we are supportive
2
of a path and safer pedestrian walkway, the current proposed path in Alternative 1 between Arden Place and Skiles Lane
is our concern. As the only house with a driveway that would be impacted on this stretch (it is not currently documented
in the plan), our concern is with safety of where the proposed path would cross our driveway. Due to the hills and trees I
am concerned that it would create a blind intersection between pedestrians and vehicles backing out/coming in to our
driveway and a safety hazard to my family and pedestrians on the path.
If the current design remains Alternative 1 and part of the official proposal, I request that a safety assessment of this
intersection be conducted.
Jamie and I would be happy to discuss further so please let us know if you have questions or would like to talk through.
Thank you and Happy Holidays!
Mike and Jamie Halleckson
1471 Skiles Lane
From: Jamie Halleckson <jamiehalleckson@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 8:28 PM
To: Mike.Halleckson <Mike.Halleckson@target.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Old Snelling project
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jamie Halleckson <jamiehalleckson@gmail.com>
Date: August 27, 2020 at 12:59:59 PM CDT
To: Todd Blomstrom <TBlomstrom@cityofardenhills.org>
Subject: Re: Old Snelling project
Thanks for the timeline. A speed study would be great. That would include Old Snelling
(specifically the stretch south of Lindy’s?) I had thought that was a state road, but that’s great if
it’s not.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Todd Blomstrom
<TBlomstrom@cityofardenhills.org> wrote:
The proposed roundabout may be discussed at a work session next month, otherwise
the feasibility report for the overall project would be completed and presented to the
City Council in November. Snelling Avenue North is a city street, so the City will conduct
a speed study as part of the design process.
From: Jamie Halleckson <jamiehalleckson@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 11:31 AM
To: Todd Blomstrom <TBlomstrom@cityofardenhills.org>
Subject: Re: Old Snelling project
From:Sally Literski
To:David Swearingen
Subject:Support for roundabout at County Rd E and Old Snelling
Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 5:18:33 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hello,
I just watched your presentation yesterday. Very well done. I'm sending a quick note to say
that I strongly support installing a round-about at the Cty Rd E/Old Snelling intersection. I
regularly see drivers rolling through the stop signs and at busy times it becomes something of
a game of chicken. Also, drivers cut the corners to make quick turns which makes it somewhat
risky to be waiting in the left turn lane.
I know that it's not part of this project, but I'd also like to recommend that the access at the
south end of Old Snelling onto Highway 51 should be closed. It's unnecessary since we have
the Cty Rd E access so close. There is really no acceleration lane onto Hwy 51 and visibility is
limited because of the curve so it's unsafe.
Thank you,
Sarah Literski
1378 Forest Lane
From:DAVE O
To:David Swearingen
Subject:Snelling Avenue North and Cummings Lane Street Improvements
Date:Friday, March 12, 2021 9:11:29 AM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi David,
Kris, my wife, and I have lived on Cummings Lane since 1984. We are happy to hear that Old
Snelling and Cummings Lane will be re-done next year. It really needs it. Kris and I even went
to a city council meeting about 10 years ago to bring attention to this deterioration and point
out the safety concerns.
One issue that you should be aware of when you are designing Cummings Lane is that it is
more than a residential, one block street. There is a group home-care business that has
operated next door to us the whole time we have lived here. There are three buses that pick-
up home-care residents in the morning and drop them off in the afternoon, Monday through
Friday. There are 2-3 caregivers for two shifts that are also coming and going each day. All this
additional traffic creates excessive wear to the street. You can see that the street has eroded
from this traffic. I do not believe the street had been designed to handle this amount of traffic.
It is also important that the east end of Cummins Lane is designed so the buses and other
commercial vehicles can turn around at the end of the block.
We prefer the Alternative 2 with trail. If the six safety features are implemented on Old
Snelling, we think the walking trail on the west side of Old Snelling will be acceptable. The
speed limit should be reduced to 30 MPH. Old Snelling from County Road E to Hwy 51 is used
as a drag strip at the present time. Not safe!
We also prefer the roundabout for the intersection at County Road E and Old Snelling. People
have been making rolling right-hand turns here for years. Might as well make it a roundabout.
Give us a call if you have any questions. Thank you for your time.
Dave and Kris O'Brien
1377 Cummings Lane
Arden Hills, MN 55112
651-636-1851
From:John Hoffmann
To:David Swearingen
Subject:Re: Public Comment for Snelling Ave N and Co E improvement project
Date:Monday, March 8, 2021 9:01:21 PM
Attachments:image001.jpg
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hello David,
Thank you for the quick reply and detailed response! It was very informative. With that being
said, my overall opinion is there has been turnover in the neighbors along old Snelling ave and
a lot of new active families with small children have moved in. Along with the increased
college rentals, there is a lot of pedestrian traffic on Old Snelling. Safety improvements for
pedestrians are needed along that stretch of road and I think the best option is alternative one
with the trail. I also agree that there is a need for a path by the High School, but I don't think
this should be framed as a "either or "situation. With generational low interest rates, bonding
should be considered as well to improve the safety of old snelling and replace the water main
when the city controls the timing of the fix.
Thank you for considering my opinion.
John
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:41 AM David Swearingen <DSwearingen@cityofardenhills.org>
wrote:
John,
Thank you for providing feedback for this project, it is appreciated especially during the
planning phase. Please see comments to your questions below in red.
Regards,
David Swearingen
Interim Public Works Director
Mobile: 651 788 0269
Office: 651 792 7847
Picture1
From: John Hoffmann <hoffy4950@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 5:13 PM
To: David Swearingen <DSwearingen@cityofardenhills.org>
Subject: Public Comment for Snelling Ave N and Co E improvement project
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hello David,
Thank you for posting the information and opening it up for public comment. I am new to
reviewing city planning documents, so if there are answers elsewhere on the City's website,
please let me know. I have a couple questions
1. For the water main work on Snelling Ave. How many more years before the water
main would require replacement? The water main consists of Cast Iron Pipe and was
installed in 1970. Water main replacement is decided after reviewing factors such as
age, material type, break history, location (under pavement or not), potential new land
developments, etc. That being said, there isn’t an exact life cycle set for replacement
but rather condition and risk is assessed for water main segments throughout the City.
The water main along this section of Snelling does not have a history of breaks and
the pipe is sized adequately to service the area which is why we aren’t proposing to
replace everything within the project area. With the age of the pipe over 50 years old,
there is a higher risk of breaks and we want to avoid impacting the new roadway with
repairs if that happens. The segments identified for replacement are below what will
be newly constructed pavement, fortunately most of the existing pipe is located
outside the roadway within the boulevard and that pipe can be repaired much more
easily.
2. For funding sources. Are the Sanitary, Water & Storm. Do those funding sources just
come from the rates residents are charged for water? Each funding source is separate,
the rates can be found in the fee schedule
https://www.cityofardenhills.org/DocumentCenter/View/8/Fee-Schedule-2021?bidId=
, page 10 under Utility Use Charges.
3. Has the City looked for any State Grant program as a funding source? Yes, with every
project we look into other sources of funding and with these programs it is usually a
match of project costs anywhere from 25 to 50%. Recently in 2018 a trail was
constructed along Old Snelling from County Rd E to County Rd E2 and connected a
few segments along Cty Rd E2 to 35W. Looking at our records this project consumed
much of our State Aid project funding. Another trail project that is of high priority is
the Mounds View High School Trail that extends from the high school along Lake
Valentine Rd to Old Highway 10 then extends south along Old Highway 10 to County
Rd E2. This project was just approved to move forward with design at a recent
Council Meeting to prepare it for grant opportunities.
Thanks!
John Hoffmann
3500 Glenarden Rd
Amy Hoffmann
3500 Glenarden Road
Arden Hills, MN 55112
612-805-9519
amyrhoffmann@gmail.com
March 8, 2021
Dear David Swearingen,
I’m writing to express my support for the trail along Snelling Avenue south of County Road E. This trail
will greatly improve the safety of this corridor for pedestrians and bikers and will connect these
neighborhoods with broader trail systems in the area. After attending the City Council meeting on this
topic earlier in January, I understand there are concerns around the cost of the trail that need to be
addressed before the project is approved. I’d like to share perspective and feedback on these concerns.
Of utmost priority for the City Council should be safety of our residents in the area. This stretch of road
is heavily used by pedestrians and bikers, and improvements by way of a curbed trail in this area is
greatly needed. As a family with three kids, we use this road almost daily and a dedicated trail would
improve the accessibility and safety of the area. On numerous occasions, we have personally witnessed
and experienced vehicles driving at excessive speeds, swerving, and not paying attention to the road.
Because of these facts, it is imperative the City Council make this needed investment in a curbed trail.
Additionally, students within certain area of Valentine Hills Elementary School and Mounds View High
School are not available for free busing as they are considered in walking distance of the respective
schools. Given the current state of the road and lack of a dedicated trail, I would not feel safe sending
my kids to walk to school.
During the City Council meeting, certain members of the council raised concerns about the cost of the
trail due to complexities arising with a water main and toxic soil. I suggest that the council prioritize the
trail and find solutions that meet the needs of the residents. Below are a few ideas the City Council
could consider to drive towards a solution:
1. Instead of the wide paths in other recent improvements such as the path from E2 to E along
Snelling, allow for a narrower curbed trail that could accommodate 2 people. I would think 4-6
feet wide would be sufficient and would reduce cost of the trail.
2. For any section of trail that is particularly driving up the cost such as the toxic soil and steep
shoulders, consider skipping a trail in that section and resume trail where it is feasible to do so.
Doing this would allow for a vast improvement in the most cost-effective way. For example, if
any section is too steep or possibly where toxic soil is located, simply shift the trail back to the
shoulder of the road.
3. Consider moving trail to the East side of the road where there are already curbs in Lindey’s park.
This side of the road may mitigate the water main and toxic soil issues. As the trail gets closer to
the pond where the banks are steeper, this section could remain as road shoulder (as stated in
point #2 above) with extra safety precautions put in place.
4. Leverage the existing footprint of the road and consider shifting the driving parts of the road a
few feet such that one shoulder is a bit narrower and the other side of the road is wider. This
could mitigate or reduce widening the road to accommodate a trail and instead utilize the
overall width of the space. This option could reduce the overall cost of the project.
5. Overall safety measures such as rumble strips, flashing lights for pedestrians, dedicated cross-
walks, speed flash signs, bright white paint for the shoulder, and reduced speed limits are all
additional measures that could be taken at relatively low cost to improve safety in this stretch of
road.
I strongly urge the City Council to dedicate time to a public comment meeting where residents can pose
questions and discuss this project with our councilmembers.
In summary, this investment to the community needs to be made to allow for Arden Hills residents a
safe and beautiful trail to enjoy the scenic views that we all appreciate and value. Please do not hesitate
to reach out if you have any questions. I look forward to continuing to monitor the progress on the trail.
Sincerely,
Amy Hoffmann
APPENDIX K
Project Cost Estimates
Opinion of Probable Costs
Area 1, Alternative 1
Area 1, Alternative 2
Area 2, Roundabout Intersection
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALTERNATIVE NO. 1
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North - County Road E to Highway 51
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No.Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS -1 115,000.00$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS -1 25,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - GENERAL AND REMOVALS 140,000.00$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)51,800.00$
TOTAL - GENERAL AND REMOVALS 191,800.00$
3 CLEARING ACRE $5,150.00 2.0 10,300.00$
4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT $4.00 700 2,800.00$
5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $3.00 27,300 81,900.00$
6 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT $3.50 848 2,968.00$
7 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD $20.00 10,300 206,000.00$
8 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD $22.00 5,500 121,000.00$
9 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON $18.00 4,170 75,060.00$
10 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $3.25 885 2,876.25$
11 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $85.00 656 55,760.00$
12 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $70.00 2,150 150,500.00$
13 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $70.00 1,880 131,600.00$
14 6-INCH CONCRETE WALK - PEDESTRIAN RAMP SQ FT $14.00 2,050 28,700.00$
15 TRUNCATED DOME SQ FT $59.00 160 9,440.00$
16 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LIN FT $15.00 5,360 80,400.00$
17 STRIPING & SIGNAGE LS -1 100,000.00$
18 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH $2,200.00 2 4,400.00$
19 EROSION CONTROL AND RESTORATION LS -1 200,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1,263,704$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)467,571$
TOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1,731,275$
20 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 7.00$ 3025.00 21,175.00$
21 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 5.00$ 75.00 375.00$
22 REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY EACH 480.00$ 6.00 2,880.00$
23 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 175.00$ 16.00 2,800.00$
24 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 105.00$ 4.00 420.00$
25 2-INCH RIGID INSULATION SQ YD 34.50$ 40.00 1,380.00$
26 SPECIAL SOIL HANDLING FOR CONTAMINATION LS -$ 1.00 12,000.00$
27 INSTALL HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND 6-INCH DIP CL 52 ASSEMBLY EACH 5,900.00$ 7.00 41,300.00$
28 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 195.00$ 4.00 780.00$
29 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,150.00$ 3.00 6,450.00$
30 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,389.00$ 13.00 31,057.00$
31 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 400.00$ 4.00 1,600.00$
32 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 910.00$ 8.00 7,280.00$
33 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LIN FT 40.00$ 75.00 3,000.00$
34 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS - EXPOXY COATED LBS 7.25$ 2170.00 15,732.50$
35 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 50.00$ 2500.00 125,000.00$
36 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 57.00$ 525.00 29,925.00$
SUBTOTAL - WATER SYSTEM 303,155$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)112,167$
TOTAL - WATER SYSTEM 415,322$
Snelling Avenue North
CR E to Hwy 51
MOBILIZATION AND REMOVAL
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WATER SYSTEM
Page 1 of 2
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALTERNATIVE NO. 1
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North - County Road E to Highway 51
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No.Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price
Snelling Avenue North
CR E to Hwy 51
37 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT 10.00 130.00 1,300.00
38 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 105.00 2.00 210.00
39 EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION (< 13' DEPTH)EACH 3,500.00 2.00 7,000.00
40 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WASTEWATER LS 6,000.00 1.00 6,000.00
41 10" PVC PIPE SEWER (SANITARY SDR 26)LF 145.00 130.00 18,850.00
42 RECONSTRUCT OUTSIDE DROP LIN FT 866.00 5.00 4,330.00
43 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 1,075.00 2.00 2,150.00
SUBTOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 39,840$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)14,741$
TOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 54,581$
44 REMOVE PIPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 13.00$ 850.00 11,050.00$
45 4-INCH PE CORRUGATED PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN WITH SOCK LIN FT 17.50$ 5390.00 94,325.00$
46 CONNECT 4-INCH PVC OR PERF PE TO STORM SEWER EACH 183.00$ 25.00 4,575.00$
47 15-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 48.00$ 830.00 39,840.00$
48 18-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 50.75$ 1700.00 86,275.00$
49 21-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 56.00$ 1375.00 77,000.00$
50 24-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 62.00$ 490.00 30,380.00$
51 48-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 80.00$ 180.00 14,400.00$
52 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1,350.00$ 6.00 8,100.00$
53 24" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1,450.00$ 16.00 23,200.00$
54 48" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2,200.00$ 4.00 8,800.00$
55 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 750.00$ 1.00 750.00$
56 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 EACH 2,050.00$ 20.00 41,000.00$
57 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 EACH 3,200.00$ 5.00 16,000.00$
58 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 815.00$ 25.00 20,375.00$
59 BMP FOR QUALITY & RATE CONTROL - NORTH SEGMENT LS 75,000.00$ 1.00 75,000.00$
60 BMP FOR QUALITY & RATE CONTROL - CENTRAL SEGMENT LS 50,000.00$ 1.00 50,000.00$
61 BMP FOR QUALITY & RATE CONTROL - SOUTH SEGMENT LS 50,000.00$ 1.00 50,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - STORM SEWER 651,070.00$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)240,896$
TOTAL - STORM SEWER 891,965.90$
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
Page 2 of 2
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALTERNATIVE NO. 2
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North - County Road E to Highway 51
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No. Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 40,000.00 0.86 34,400.00 0.06 2,064.00 0.08 165.12
2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 28,000.00 0.85 23,800.00 0.06 1,680.00 0.08 2,240.00
SUBTOTAL - MOBILIZATION AND TRAFFIC 58,200$ 3,744$ 2,405$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)21,534$ 1,385$ 890$
TOTAL - MOBILIZATION AND TRAFFIC 79,734$ 5,129$ 3,295$
2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 5.00 250.00 1,250.00 130.00 650.00 0.00 0.00
2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 3.25 0.00 0.00 400.00 1,300.00 0.00 0.00
2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 4.00 700.00 2,800.00 30.00 120.00 0.00 0.00
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)(P)CU YD 20.00 2,300.00 46,000.00 300.00 6,000.00 200.00 4,000.00
2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 28.00 100.00 2,800.00 270.00 7,560.00 10.00 280.00
2105.602 POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES EACH 535.00 5.00 2,675.00 1.00 535.00 0.00 0.00
2123.501 COMMON LABORERS HOUR 83.00 15.00 1,245.00 4.00 332.00 0.00 0.00
2123.507 3.0 CU YD SHOVEL HOUR 182.00 15.00 2,730.00 4.00 728.00 0.00 0.00
2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 155.00 40.00 6,200.00 6.00 930.00 0.00 0.00
2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL M GALS 34.00 100.00 3,400.00 10.00 340.00 10.00 340.00
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 20.00 500 10,000.00 180 3,600.00 300 6,000.00
2331.604
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 7, FULL DEPTH
RECYCLED PRODUCTION SQ YD 2.55 18,250.00 46,537.50 0.00 0.00 1,800.00 4,590.00
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALS 3.25 925.00 3,006.25 25.00 81.25 85.00 276.25
2360.501 TYPE SPWEB240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 70.00 4,350.00 304,500.00 95.00 6,650.00 400.00 28,000.00
2531.501
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 -
HAND FORM LIN FT 30.00 250.00 7,500.00 130.00 3,900.00 0.00 0.00
2554.602 GUARD RAIL END TREATMENT EACH 3,000.00 4.00 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2554.602 GUARD RAIL LIN FT 70.00 400.00 28,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2232.602 MILLED RUMBLE STRIPS LIN FT 1.00 8,200.00 8,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2564.602 INSTALL SIGN EACH 250.00 25.00 6,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2564.602 F&I SPEED DISPLAY SIGN EACH 10,000.00 2.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2582.502 4" SOLID LINE - PAINT LIN FT 2.25 8,200.00 18,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2582.502 4" DOUBLE YELLOW - PAINT LIN FT 2.25 4,100.00 9,225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2582.502 24" STOP LINE - PAINT LIN FT 14.00 50.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUBTOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 543,469$ 32,726$ 43,486$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)201,083$ 12,109$ 16,090$
TOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 744,552$ 44,835$ 59,576$
Bussard Ct
Pavement Reconstruction
Cummings Lane
FDR
Snelling Avenue North
CR E to Hwy 51
MOBILIZATION AND REMOVAL
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Page 1 of 3
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALTERNATIVE NO. 2
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North - County Road E to Highway 51
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No. Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price
Bussard Ct
Pavement Reconstruction
Cummings Lane
FDR
Snelling Avenue North
CR E to Hwy 51
2104.501 REMOVE PIPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 15.00 200.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 450.00
2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 185.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 370.00 1.00 185.00
2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, HAND FORM LIN FT 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 3,250.00
2503.541 18-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 52.00 55.00 2,860.00 0.00 0.00 58.00 3,016.00
2503.541 24-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 75.00 55.00 4,125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2503.541 48-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 95.00 90.00 8,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2503.541 18-INCH FES EACH 2.00 525.00 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
2503.541 24-INCH FES EACH 2.00 750.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2503.541 48-INCH FES EACH 2.00 1,100.00 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2503.541 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 EACH 2050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 4,100.00
2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733 EACH 1,225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2,450.00
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 2,150.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 4,300.00 0.00 0.00
SUBTOTAL - STORM SEWER 23,285$ 4,670$ 13,453$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)8,615$ 1,728$ 4,978$
TOTAL - STORM SEWER 31,900$ 6,398$ 18,431$
1 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT 10.00 130.00 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 105.00 2.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3
EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
CONNECTION (< 13' DEPTH)EACH 3,500.00 2.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WASTEWATER LS 6,000.00 1.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 10" PVC PIPE SEWER (SANITARY SDR 26)LF 145.00 130.00 18,850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 RECONSTRUCT OUTSIDE DROP LIN FT 866.00 5.00 4,330.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 1,075.00 2.00 2,150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUBTOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 39,840$ -$ -$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)14,741$ -$ -$
TOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 54,581$ -$ -$
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
Page 2 of 3
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALTERNATIVE NO. 2
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North - County Road E to Highway 51
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No. Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price Est. Quantity Total Price
Bussard Ct
Pavement Reconstruction
Cummings Lane
FDR
Snelling Avenue North
CR E to Hwy 51
1 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 7.00 750.00 5,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY EACH 480.00 2.00 960.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 175.00 6.00 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 SPECIAL SOIL HANDLING FOR CONTAMINATION LS 6,500.00 1.00 6,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 2-INCH RIGID INSULATION SQ YD 34.50 20.00 690.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6
INSTALL HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND 6-INCH DIP CL
52 ASSEMBLY EACH 5,900.00 2.00 11,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,150.00 3.00 6,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,389.00 6.00 14,334.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 258.00 6.00 1,548.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 910.00 3.00 2,730.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS - EXPOXY COATED LBS 7.25 1,600.00 11,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 50.00 50.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 57.00 700.00 39,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUBTOTAL - WATER SYSTEM 105,312$ -$ -$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)38,965$ -$ -$
TOTAL - WATER SYSTEM 144,277$ -$ -$
2573.53 INLET PROTECTION - TYPE A EACH 128.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 256.00 2.00 256.00
2123.604 TILL BOULEVARD SUBGRADE SQ YD 2.75 50.00 137.50 135.00 371.25 0.00 0.00
2574.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CU YD 28.40 20.00 568.00 30.00 852.00 0.00 0.00
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SQ YD 3.90 75.00 292.50 135.00 526.50 0.00 0.00
2575.525 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 4.50 1,700.00 7,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2575.601 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.00 1.00 10,000.00 1.00 3,500.00 1.00 1,200.00
2575.605 HYDROSEEDING ACRE 6,180.00 1.50 9,270.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 1,545.00
SUBTOTAL - RESTORATION 27,918$ 5,506$ 3,001$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)10,330$ 2,037$ 1,110$
TOTAL - RESTORATION 38,248$ 7,543$ 4,111$
RESTORATION
WATER SYSTEM
Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX B - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - Single Lane Roundabout
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North at County Road E
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No. Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS - 1 75,000.00$
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS - 1 50,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - MOBILIZATION AND TRAFFIC 125,000.00$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)46,250.00$
TOTAL - MOBILIZATION AND TRAFFIC 171,250.00$
3 CLEARING EACH $315.00 5 1,575.00$
4 GRUBBING EACH $135.00 5 675.00$
5 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT $3.00 120 360.00$
6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $3.00 4,330 12,990.00$
7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAIL SQ YD $5.00 200 1,000.00$
8 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT $3.50 1,650 5,775.00$
9 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT $1.75 95 166.25$
10 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD $16.00 3,100 49,600.00$
11 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD $22.00 1,700 37,400.00$
12 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON $18.00 1,275 22,950.00$
13 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $3.25 217 705.25$
14 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $85.00 175 14,875.00$
15 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $75.00 600 45,000.00$
16 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON $75.00 600 45,000.00$
17 6-INCH CONCRETE WALK - PEDESTRIAN RAMP SQ FT $14.00 200 2,800.00$
18 8-INCH CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ FT $20.00 2,750 55,000.00$
19 TRUNCATED DOME SQ FT $59.00 170 10,030.00$
20 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LIN FT $18.00 2,850 51,300.00$
21 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE LIN FT $20.00 460 9,200.00$
22 STRIPING & SIGNAGE LS - 1 50,000.00$
23 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH $2,200.00 1 2,200.00$
24 ROW & EASEMENTS LS - 1 125,000.00$
25 EROSION CONTROL AND RESTORATION LS - 1 60,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 603,602$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)223,333$
TOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 826,934$
26 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 6.30$ 775.00 4,882.50$
27 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 5.00$ 20.00 100.00$
28 REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY EACH 480.00$ 1.00 480.00$
29 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 175.00$ 3.00 525.00$
30 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 105.00$ 1.00 105.00$
31 2-INCH RIGID INSULATION SQ YD 34.50$ 20.00 690.00$
32 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS -$ 1.00 5,000.00$
33 INSTALL HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND 6-INCH DIP CL 52 ASSEMBLY EACH 5,900.00$ 1.00 5,900.00$
34 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 195.00$ 1.00 195.00$
35 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 4,000.00$ 4.00 16,000.00$
36 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 400.00$ 1.00 400.00$
37 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 258.00$ 4.00 1,032.00$
38 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 1,000.00$ 3.00 3,000.00$
39 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LIN FT 40.00$ 80.00 3,200.00$
40 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS - EXPOXY COATED LBS 7.25$ 1050.00 7,612.50$
41 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 45.00$ 15.00 675.00$
42 12" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 70.00$ 760.00 53,200.00$
102,997$
PRELIM. ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY 38,109$
WATER TOTAL OPC ESTIMATE 141,106$
MOBILIZATION AND TRAFFIC
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WATER SYSTEM
Snelling Avenue at County Road E
Intersection Improvements
WATER SUBTOTAL
Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX B - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - Single Lane Roundabout
Feasibility Study
Snelling Avenue North at County Road E
Arden HIlls, Minnesota
Project Number PW-21-0100
Item No. Item Unit Unit Price Est. Quantity Total Price
Snelling Avenue at County Road E
Intersection Improvements
43 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT 10.00$ 280 2,800.00$
44 REMOVE SANITARY SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 10.00$ 35 350.00$
45 REMOVE MANHOLE EACH 700.00$ 3 2,100.00$
46 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WASTEWATER LS -$ 1 8,500.00$
47 DEWATERING - SANITARY SEWER LS -$ 1 7,500.00$
48 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 1,900.00$ 1 1,900.00$
49 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE (SAN)EACH 1,595.00$ 1 1,595.00$
50 8" x 4" PVC WYE, SCHEDULE 40 EACH 200.00$ 1 200.00$
51 8" PVC PIPE SEWER (SANITARY SDR 35)LIN FT 65.00$ 280 18,200.00$
52 LINING SEWER PIPE 8" DIA LIN FT 50.00$ 250 12,500.00$
53 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE (SCH 40)LIN FT 45.00$ 15 675.00$
54 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE (SCH 40)LIN FT 48.00$ 20 960.00$
55 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733 (SELF SEAL LID)EACH 1,155.00$ 4 4,620.00$
56 CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 4,100.00$ 4 16,400.00$
57 CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MH (EXTRA DEPTH)LIN FT 290.00$ 12 3,480.00$
SUBTOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 81,780$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)30,259$
TOTAL - SANITARY SEWER 112,039$
58 REMOVE PIPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 13.00$ 600.00 7,800.00$
59 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 575.00$ 6.00 3,450.00$
60 4-INCH PE CORRUGATED PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN WITH SOCK LIN FT 18.00$ 700.00 12,600.00$
61 CONNECT 4-INCH PVC OR PERF PE TO STORM SEWER EACH 183.00$ 4.00 732.00$
62 15-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 50.00$ 500.00 25,000.00$
63 18-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 55.00$ 275.00 15,125.00$
64 21-INCH STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 59.00$ 120.00 7,080.00$
65 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1,350.00$ 1.00 1,350.00$
66 21" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1,400.00$ 1.00 1,400.00$
67 STORM SEWER PIPE LINING LIN FT 75.00$ 665.00 49,875.00$
68 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 750.00$ 2.00 1,500.00$
69 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 EACH 2,050.00$ 8.00 16,400.00$
70 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 EACH 3,200.00$ 3.00 9,600.00$
71 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1,100.00$ 11.00 12,100.00$
72 BMP FOR QUALITY & RATE CONTROL - INTERSECTION LS 150,000.00$ 1.00 150,000.00$
SUBTOTAL - STORM SEWER 314,012.00$
ENG. DESIGN, ADMIN, CONTINGENCY (37%)116,184$
TOTAL - STORM SEWER 430,196.44$
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX L
Preliminary Assessment Roll
FreewayParkLindey's Park
JohannaMarsh
Lake JohannaSIEMS CTHAMLINEGLENARDEN RDA R D E N PL
OA K AVE
FOREST LNRIDGEWOOD RDSKILES LNL A M E T T I L N
ASBURY AVE NBUSSARD CT CANNONDEN CTRIDGEWOOD CTC
U
M
MIN
G
S LNPASCAL AVE NEDGEWATER AVE
TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NARDEN PLSKILES LNLAMETTI CIRL A K E J O H A N N A BLVDSIEMS CTARDEN PL
GLENAARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NAVE
INGERSON RD
AVE NCO U N T Y R O A D E W CONNELLY AVESNELLING AVE NRD EN RDG
L
E
NAR13933653
133513571370141214313484152015781616160015941590
3168
3207
3208
32223235
3400
3411
3459
3588
3200
3263
3265
1355
3400 3420
145414351487 131413083377
3445
3213
3261
1580
3610
1505
3180
3535
3
3
9
4
1313
3369
3438
3270
1483 13263385
1468
1450
3395
3254
1401
14003517
3427
1400
3581
13203354
13143544
3413
3371
1471
3430
3421
13061370
130013861600
14011445
3455
3270
3550
3530
1433 13771353140113671431
3505
1 4 5 8
3586
3550
3434
1500
3466
1466
12943201
1399
12983331
3631
1482
3551
3628
14341535
3426
3447
13663272
3447
3484
1454 14151516
3576
35103529
1539
3454
15233500
15563568
1525
341912963508
13273436
3522
3520
1492130313193461
1535
3270.5 13781489
3582
3530
1295137313781394
1315140015531451
14071385132313851450142114853590
15043570
3623
3436
3609
3442 142914153327
1541
14753531
3564
3401
1377343032383319
3511
15411478
331114193541
3448
1404
13253 5 1 5
140813873 5 2 1
144815503437
3452
15351468
3632
3233129231703635
14173444
321015563470
3260
1484 13703435154914001423
34611611
3493 13763549131515873580
1384139213691550154814143489
3583
3440
1545 141714273475 13773568
15161429
3530
15571385140014203311 139114261613
142015741301142615641556139213771423140413993574
1 4 6 5
3558
3465
1 4 5 5 14123471 14113538
350515751563143515201406131714341405146214553312
3538
143014283511
14633544
3188138314431528131514421462143414803415
144115401569145136253641
154015363459
130913053461
14711297158415323320
1 4 7 9
3517
32401 4 7 1
3521
3505 14273620
3464 143735523 6111 6 0 5
3450
1 6 0 9
34581618
13141324 13081302
3220 1302323213221479
3271
Prepared by:City of Roseville Engineering Department
Data Sources and Contacts:* Ramsey County GIS Base Map (2/27/12)* City of Roseville Engineering DepartmentFor further information regarding the contents of this map contact:City of Roseville, Engineering Department,2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN
DISCLAIMER:This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records,information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is tobe used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to preparethis map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purposerequiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepanciesare found please contact 651-792-7044. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000),and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees todefend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties whicharise out of the user's access or use of data provided.
0 100 200 300 400 Feet
March 15, 2012
mapdoc: OldSnellingAssessments.mxd
map: OldSnellingAssessments.pdf
Old Snelling Avenue Rehabilitation Assessments
Parcels to Assess
Rehabilitation Segment
City Project:Snelling Avenue North and County Road E - Street and Utility Improvements
Project No.:PW-20-0100
Date:November 5, 2020
PID OWNER NAME 1 OWNER NAME 2 OWNER STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE SINGLE-FAMILY REU
PEOPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
343023340023 3233 SNELLING AVE N U Kurt Scholz Lorraine E Tompkins 3233 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023340022 3235 SNELLING AVE N U Kurt Scholz Lorraine E Tompkins 3233 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023320009 3261 SNELLING AVE N Spencer A Johnson Jan D Johnson 3261 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310013 3263 SNELLING AVE N Roland E Engel, Joan P Engel Rolf R Engel, Barbara M Engel 3263 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 3 $13,572
343023310001 3265 SNELLING AVE N Rolf R Engel Rev Liv Tr Barbara M Engel Rev Liv Tr 3265 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 2 $9,048
343023310047 3271 SNELLING AVE N Roland Edward Engel, Martin Rudolf Engel Heidi Louise Burris 3265 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310028 3260 SNELLING AVE N Mark H Muska Karin E Muska 3260 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310026 3270 SNELLING AVE N Kurt A Wick Ying Tan 3270 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310025 3270 1/2 SNELLING AVE N Seth C Kinzer -3270 1/2 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310016 3272 SNELLING AVE N David J Clausen Barbara A Clausen 3272 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023310015 3354 SNELLING AVE N Ellen J Campbell -3354 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023230039 3369 SNELLING AVE N Jonathan Frank -3369 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023240037 3371 SNELLING AVE N Dennis M Ott Sharon C Ott 3371 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023240036 3377 SNELLING AVE N Robert H Carlson Jr Gregg S Larson 3377 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023240038 3385 SNELLING AVE N Mark A Heggestad Jill M Heggestad 3385 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023240030 3395 SNELLING AVE N Peter Dufault -3395 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023230040 3401 SNELLING AVE N Sara J Schultz Mohn -3401 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023230031 3413 SNELLING AVE N Paul B Dykstra Tr -3413 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023230030 3421 SNELLING AVE N James N Aman Paula M Aman 3421 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023230029 3427 SNELLING AVE N R David Resch Laurie J Resch 3427 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023220039 3515 SNELLING AVE N Christy L Timm Hughes Christopher P Hughes 3515 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023220038 3521 SNELLING AVE N Luzmila G Amundson Michael E Amundson 3521 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023220037 3529 SNELLING AVE N David L Webster Trustee Dianne S Wolf Trustee 3529 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
343023220032 3583 SNELLING AVE N Jonathan P Taylor Karla M Taylor 3583 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
TOTAL AREA 1 $122,148
273023330019 1525 LAKE JOHANNA BLVD Patricia A Rushman -1525 Lake Johanna Blvd Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,524
273023330014 3610 SNELLING AVE N Lindey S Inc -3610 Snelling Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 COMM $14,335
TOTAL AREA 2 $18,859
343023310017 1399 CUMMINGS LN Emily Peterson Christopher Peterson 1399 Cummings Ln Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,071
343023310018 1385 CUMMINGS LN Bhjn Llc Acr Homes Inc Mississippi 2437 Rice St and 2055 Rice St Roseville MN 55113 1 $4,071
343023310020 1377 CUMMINGS LN David A Obrien Kristine J Obrien PO Box 120385 New Brighton MN 55112 1 $4,071
343023310019 1357 CUMMINGS LN State Of Mn Trust Exempt Ramsey Co Tax Forf Land PO Box 64097 St Paul MN 55164 1 - TBD $4,071
343023310045 1355 CUMMINGS LN Christopher J Nason Vicki Lynn Nason 1355 Cummings Ln Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,071
343023310024 1366 CUMMINGS LN Howard F Wallace Trustee Ruby M Wallace Trustee 17423 Lever St NE Andover MN 55304 1 $4,071
343023310023 1378 CUMMINGS LN Kao Thao James P Thao 1378 Cummings Lane Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,071
343023310022 1400 CUMMINGS LN Rebecca Mitchell Scott Johnson 1400 Cummings Ln Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 $4,071
TOTAL CUMMINGS LN $32,568
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Draft Assessment Roll
Page 1 of 1
To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and
clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-022
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SNELLING AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY
ROAD E STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2019-026 of the Council adopted August 26, 2018, a
report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of the following
streets:
Snelling Avenue North from Trunk Highway 51 to County Road E
Cummings Lane
Bussard Court from Snelling Avenue North to 100-Feet West of Snelling Avenue North
Intersection of Snelling Avenue North and County Road E
WHEREAS, and this report was received by the Council on April 12, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a
description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report
and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement
of $1,242,600.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 26th day of April,
2021, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the City Administrator
shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by
law.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 12th
DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
_________________________________________
David Grant, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Julie Hanson, City Clerk