Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-08-21-Planning CommissionAPPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 4, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting 08 -04 -21 PC.PDF PLANNING CASES Planning Case 21 -022 –City Of Arden Hills -Zoning Code Amendment To Section 1325 And Municipal Code Section 400 And 410 Regarding The Keeping Of Chickens (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Planning Case 21 -019 –3737 Lexington Avenue –Launch Properties –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, And Site Plan Review (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF Planning Case 21 -021 –3300 New Brighton Road And 1893 Beckman Avenue – Minor Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Planning Case 21 -020 –2 Pine Tree Drive –Bethel University –PUD Amendment (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF Planning Case 21 -023 –City Of Arden Hills –3588 Ridgewood Road MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair: Paul Vijums Commissioners: Steven Jones Subbaya Subramanian Jonathan Wicklund Clayton Zimmerman Marcie Jefferys Kurt Weber Council Liaison: Fran Holmes Planning Commission September 8, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website Agenda CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 2.A. Documents: 3. 3.A. Documents: 3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 3.D. Documents: 3.E. Documents: 4. 5. 5.A. 5.B. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESAugust 4, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting08-04 -21 PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 21 -022 –City Of Arden Hills -Zoning Code Amendment To Section 1325 And Municipal Code Section 400 And 410 Regarding The Keeping Of Chickens (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFPlanning Case 21 -019 –3737 Lexington Avenue –Launch Properties –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, And Site Plan Review (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF Planning Case 21 -021 –3300 New Brighton Road And 1893 Beckman Avenue – Minor Subdivision (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF Planning Case 21 -020 –2 Pine Tree Drive –Bethel University –PUD Amendment (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF Planning Case 21 -023 –City Of Arden Hills –3588 Ridgewood Road MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS COMMENTS AND REPORTS Report From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Paul VijumsCommissioners:Steven JonesSubbaya SubramanianJonathan WicklundClayton ZimmermanMarcie JefferysKurt WeberCouncil Liaison:Fran Holmes Planning Commission September 8, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting,strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirableCity in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents:3.B. Documents: 3.C. Documents: 3.D. Documents: 3.E. Documents: 4. 5. 5.A. 5.B. 6. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESAugust 4, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting08-04 -21 PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 21 -022 –City Of Arden Hills -Zoning Code Amendment To Section 1325 And Municipal Code Section 400 And 410 Regarding The Keeping Of Chickens (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFPlanning Case 21 -019 –3737 Lexington Avenue –Launch Properties –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, And Site Plan Review (Public Hearing Required) MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFPlanning Case 21 -021 –3300 New Brighton Road And 1893 Beckman Avenue –Minor Subdivision (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFPlanning Case 21 -020 –2 Pine Tree Drive –Bethel University –PUD Amendment (Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFPlanning Case 21 -023 –City Of Arden Hills –3588 Ridgewood RoadMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFUNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESSCOMMENTS AND REPORTSReport From The City Council Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Chair:Paul VijumsCommissioners:Steven JonesSubbaya SubramanianJonathan WicklundClayton ZimmermanMarcie JefferysKurt WeberCouncil Liaison:Fran Holmes Planning Commission September 8, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting,strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirableCity in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents:3.B.Documents:3.C.Documents:3.D.Documents:3.E.Documents:4.5.5.A. 5.B. 6. Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2021 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Paul Vijums called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Paul Vijums and Commissioner Clayton Zimmerman (attending in person), Commissioners Marcie Jefferys (arrived via Zoom at 6:42 p.m.), Kurtis Weber and Jonathan Wicklund (attending via Zoom). Absent: Commissioners Steven Jones and Subbaya Subramanian. Also present were: Senior Planner Jessica Jagoe, Planning Consultant Jane Kansier and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – AUGUST 4, 2021 Chair Vijums stated the agenda will stand as published. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 9, 2021 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Wicklund, to approve the June 9, 2021, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 21-016; 3900 Bethel Drive – Bolton & Menk on behalf of Bethel University – Site Plan Review of Scoreboard – No Public Hearing Senior Planner Jagoe stated Bolton & Menk (“The Applicant”), on behalf of Bethel University, is requesting a Site Plan Review for a proposed project at 3900 Bethel Drive (“Subject Property”) to update the scoreboard and sound system adjacent to the stadium field and track located in the ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 2 southern quadrant of the Bethel University Campus. Specific improvements include replacing the electronic scoreboard to an LED/Video capable scoreboard with sound system upgrade. Senior Planner Jagoe reported Bethel University was approved a Conditional Use Permit Amendment on May 3, 2021 for stadium field upgrades which included the addition of a new track around it and practice fields to be converted into multi-purpose fields in the southern quadrant of their main campus at 3900 Bethel Drive. The CUP Amendment application noted that Bethel University was proposing changes to the scoreboard. Conditions of the CUP Amendment approval were that a separate permit shall be required for the scoreboard and that prior to replacement of sound system, Bethel University would be required to submit new sound system plans to the City Council for approval. The Applicant is proposing to convert the existing electronic scoreboard to a LED/Video capable scoreboard with a sound system fully contained within the accessory structure. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the Site Data, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: General Findings: 1. The Bethel University main campus at 3900 Bethel Drive is located in the Institutional Zoning District. 2. A Higher Education, College Campus is a Conditional Use in the Institutional District. 3. Bethel University operates under a Conditional Use Permit Master Plan. 4. Athletic fields and accessory equipment are permitted under the CUP Master and Amended Plan for Bethel University. 5. Bethel University has requested Site Plan Review approval for installation of a new scoreboard and sound system in the stadium fields and track area. 6. The accessory structure and lighting would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning Code. 7. A public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review. 8. The proposed application meets all setback requirements. Site Plan Review Evaluation Findings: 9. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions because the additions do not include an increase in football field seating. 10. The proposed plan includes the addition of LED lights and will within a reasonable level increase illumination around the stadium fields. 11. The proposed project is reasonable because scoreboards considered an accessory structures are addressed in the Code as reasonable uses within educational athletic facilities. 12. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 13. The proposed plan will impact drainage on the site. 14. The proposed plan will not impact school population density. 15. The proposed plan is not expected to have a visual impact on surrounding properties or on land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land or adjoining land values because of distance and existing foliage the new accessory structure will not be easily visible from outside the Bethel University campus. 16. Park dedication requirements are not applicable. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 3 17. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21- 016 for Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the August 4, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: a) All conditions of the original Condition Use Permit and Amendments shall remain in full force and effect. b) That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Senior Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. c) The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. d) A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed scoreboard. e) That all building and setback requirements shall be met. f) The scoreboard height shall not exceed 35 feet. g) That the sound system being installed within the scoreboard shall meet all applicable standards set by the EPA and MPCA. h) A separate sign permit shall be required and scoreboard signage must meet all requirements of City Code Section 1250. i) That the scoreboard shall not be used as a dynamic sign to display sponsorship advertising, messages or videos. j) A Bethel employee shall control the lighting and sound system at the football field. k) The use of the sound system and lights at the football field be capped at 10:00 PM, except on nights that have a Bethel University sponsored events. l) That an automatic dimmer module shall be installed to reduce the nighttime light output of the LED lighting of the scoreboard based on ambient light levels. m) That the applicant shall cooperate with all reasonable requests from the City to modify direction and intensity of light and sound emitted from the scoreboard to mitigate its impact. n) The Applicant shall be required to provide photometric calculations for the stadium lighting including the LED lighting of the scoreboard at the property lines of all adjacent residential properties indicating the plan meets ordinance requirements. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Wicklund requested further information regarding Condition I. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 4 Senior Planner Jagoe explained dynamic signs are not allowed in this zoning district, which meant the scoreboard LED display was to be used for game and Bethel related purposes only. Commissioner Wicklund questioned if the applicant supported the staff recommended conditions. Jay Pomeroy, Bolton & Menk representative, explained it was his hope the conditions were consistent with the remainder of the Site Plan approval. He reported the lights would stay on until 30 minutes after an event was done. He indicated the scoreboard illumination would be capped at 10:00 p.m. He stated this meeting was the first time he was seeing the conditions and Condition I had jumped out at him. Senior Planner Jagoe commented the language for use and time was not adjusted and was a condition from the CUP . Commissioner Jefferys asked why Bethel would have the sound and lights on until 10:00 p.m. if there was not a sponsored event in the stadium. Mr. Pomeroy stated the stadium sound and scoreboard would not be on unless there was a sponsored event in the stadium. Senior Planner Jagoe explained students or teams could be using the stadium for practice She reported this was the rationale behind Condition K. Chair Vijums commented this request met all City requirements and no variance was being requested. Senior Planner Jagoe stated this was the case. Chair Vijums asked what type of sponsored events would be held at the stadium. Mark Posner, Vice President of Facilities at Bethel University, reported athletic and sporting events, youth gatherings, and graduations could be held at the stadium. He indicated all events would be capped at 10:00 p.m. Councilmember Holmes explained the City Council wanted to ensure the lights and sound were used only for University sponsored events to and not for students using the field. Chair Vijums indicated the stadium already had an existing audio system and scoreboard and the City was simply approving the new LED Video scoreboard. Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:01 p.m. Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 5 Commissioner Wicklund moved and Commissioner Weber seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-016 for Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the August 4, 2021, report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). B. Planning Case 21-017; Mounds View Public Schools – Amendment to the Approved Planned Unit Development – Public Hearing Senior Planner Jagoe stated Mounds View Public Schools (“The Applicant”) the Applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for an extension for the timing of construction of road and safety improvements as it relates to the alignment of Lake Valentine Road at 1900 and 1901 Lake Valentine Road. Senior Planner Jagoe explained at their May 22, 2019 and subsequently amended on April 27, 2020, the City Council approved Planning Case 18-014 for a Planned Unit Development with Mounds View Public Schools for Mounds View High School. The amendment added 14 additional conditions to the existing Planned Unit Development to address existing traffic and pedestrian safety issues based on the findings contained within the study report, an evaluation of existing site conditions, and the Planned Unit Development Agreement. The terms of the PUD approval requires the School District to implement safety improvements on Lake Valentine Road to address traffic and increased pedestrian crossings between the school building and the north parking lot, including installation of turn lanes and other access improvements, trail and sidewalk improvements, pedestrian signal, signage and striping modifications, and drainage and utility improvements. Senior Planner Jagoe reported the Applicant originally proposed two separate phases of traffic and pedestrian safety improvements for Lake Valentine Road. Phase 1 safety improvements, installed in 2020, which included installation of a pedestrian traffic signal system, crosswalk markings, temporary painted center median, curb ramps and sidewalk pedestrian routes to the front of the school. Senior Planner Jagoe commented the Phase 2 traffic and pedestrian safety improvements were scheduled for construction in 2021 in order to allow the School District to acquire additional property from the State of Minnesota. This additional property would allow the relocation of the west entrance to the north parking lot to align with the drop-off/pick-up lot on the south side of Lake Valentine Road. Additional improvements include construction of a center median at the crosswalk, modifications to the south boundary of the north parking lot, and the construction of dedicated right turn lanes for westbound traffic accessing the east parking lot entrance and for the eastbound traffic accessing the drop-off/pick-up lot. The current schedule in the approved PUD does not allow the School District sufficient time for completion in 2021 due to design changes for realignment on school district land. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 6 1. The properties located at 1900 and 1901 Lake Valentine Road are located in the R-1 Single Family Residential District. 2. The proposed conditions when implemented will create a safer environment for pedestrian movement across Lake Valentine Road. 3. The proposed roadway improvements will improve traffic flow through the road section adjacent to the school. 4. With the applied conditions, the application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 5. The traffic and pedestrian study was reviewed as part of the April 2020 Amended PUD application by City and School District staff. 6. The City and School District staff concur on the proposed conditions and recommended improvements. Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21- 017 for an Amended PUD at 1900 and 1901 Lake Valentine Road, based on the findings of fact, as amended by the conditions in the August 4, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: a) Extension on timeline for construction and realignment of the west parking lot entrance to align with the west school site entrance on the south side of Lake Valentine Road (Pick- up / Drop-off Access) to be completed prior to the start of the 2022-2023 school year. The School District shall submit a revised design and layout for the road and safety improvements on existing school property Site Plan Review and approval no later than December 31, 2021. b) All other conditions of the original Planned Unit Development and Amended Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Zimmerman stated he was happy to see this project being completed and he hoped this would address the concerns he has had with pedestrian and student safety. Commissioner Weber questioned if the plans change because the school district is unable to acquire the land from the State if this item would come back to the City. Senior Planner Jagoe explained this timing was addressed in the recommended conditions for approval and noted revised plans would have to come back to the City. Chair Vijums requested comment from the school district regarding this matter. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 7 Paul Apilkowski, Wold Architects and Engineers, stated he was a representative for the school district. He reported he was asking for an extension and noted the project could not be completed in 30 days. He explained initial sketches have been submitted to staff and the basic concept was the school district does not believe they will get the land in a timely manner. He commented the plan was to align the driveways within school district land. Commissioner Jefferys thanked the school district for this explanation. She asked what the State’s explanation was for not responding to the school district’s request. Chris Pawket, Mounds View Public Schools, stated he has had several representatives speak with the State over the past two years. He indicated the State keeps pushing the school district off and there was no guarantee the school district could acquire the land. Commissioner Jefferys commented she was glad this project was moving forward but wondered if the school district should move forward on a dual track, in order to continue pursuing the State land, if this was the best option. Chair Vijums stated he supported the extension and understood the State does not appear to want to move forward with the land sale. He looked forward to seeing the new plans at some point in the future. Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Commissioner Wicklund moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-017 for an Amended Planned Unit Development at 1900 and 1901 Lake Valentine Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the August 4, 2021, report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). C. Planning Case 21-018; Zoning Code Amendment to Section 1355 (Shoreland) Regarding Classification of Lakes – Public Hearing Senior Planner Jagoe stated the City of Arden Hills is proposing an amendment to the language Section 1330.02 Subd. 1 of the Arden Hills City Code to amend the lake classification for Little Johanna from a Recreational Development Lake to a General Development Lake. The lake reclassification will amend ordinance language to be consistent with Resolution 85-22 passed by the City Council. The ordinance amendment is an administrative action in accordance with previous approval by the City Council that will clean up lake classification designation. Senior Planner Jagoe explained lake classification is used to determine lot size, setbacks and, to a certain degree, land uses on adjacent land. The classification does not pertain to surface water use of boats or motors, hunting or fishing or fish management. Those are governed by other regulations. Minnesota Rule 6120.3000 Subp. 1a. identifies the types of public water classes with ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 8 a general description of each class. Staff has provided below the descriptions for waterbody classifications specific to the reclassification discussion as defined by State Statute: A. Natural environment lakes are generally small, often shallow lakes with limited capacities for assimilating the impacts of development and recreational use. They often have adjacent lands with substantial constraints for development such as high water tables, exposed bedrock, and unsuitable soils. These lakes, particularly in rural areas, usually do not have much existing development or recreational use. B. Recreational development lakes are generally medium-sized lakes of varying depths and shapes with a variety of landform, soil, and groundwater situations on the lands around them. They often are characterized by moderate levels of recreational use and existing development. Development consists mainly of seasonal and year-round residences and recreationally-oriented commercial uses. Many of these lakes have capacities for accommodating additional development and use. C. General development lakes are generally large, deep lakes or lakes of varying sizes and depths with high levels and mixes of existing development. These lakes often are extensively used for recreation and, except for the very large lakes, are heavily developed around the shore. Second and third tiers of development are fairly common. The larger examples in this class can accommodate additional development and use. Senior Planner Jagoe provided further comment on the Ordinance background and provided the following Findings of Fact: 1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning Code of the City Code. 2. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to classify Little Johanna as a General Development Lake. 3. Amendments to the Shoreland Regulations require approval from the Minnesota DNR. 4. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommended approval of a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to reclassify Little Johanna as a General Development Lake as presented in the August 4, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Zimmerman stated this was a long overdue administrative issue that had to be taken care of. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 9 Chair Vijums commented he found it strange that the classification has been shifted back to recreational on February 10, 2021. Senior Planner Jagoe explained this was done after completing a broader review of shoreland ordinances to be consistent with the DNR. Chair Vijums questioned if the reclassification will help with the permit for the new storage shed. Senior Planner Jagoe reported Lake Johanna was already classified as a general development lake, so there would be no impacts or changes to that request. She explained the only change being proposed was to Little Johanna. Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. David Short, 3156 Shorewood Drive, questioned what the difference was between general development and recreational lakes. Senior Planner Jagoe explained general development lakes are more developed, smaller lot sizes with deeper bodies of water. She indicated recreational lakes have larger lots and less development. She stated a natural environment lakes are the least dense and have further setbacks with more of a buffer between development and the shoreline. There being no additional comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Commissioner Weber reported nothing was changing for the lakes except for the classification of Little Johanna. Senior Planner Jagoe discussed how the City would not be creating any non-conforming lots with the proposed change because the setback from OHW would be changing from 75 feet to 50 feet. Chair Vijums moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-018 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to reclassify Little Johanna as a General Development Lake as presented in the August 4, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 4, 2021 10 A. Report from the City Council Councilmember Holmes provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. She thanked Senior Planner Jagoe and Planning Consultant Jane Kansier for their efforts on behalf of the City. She invited the Planning Commission members to attend the appreciation picnic which would be held on Tuesday, August 17, 2021. She discussed the events she attended for Night to Unite on Tuesday, August 3, 2021. She commented on the cleanup plans for Round Lake. She reported the judge dismissed the law suit that was brought against the Arden Hills by the County, which was good news for the City. She explained the Council approved the Chick-Fil-A request and denied the lakeshore accessory structure request due to the height of the structure. B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests None. ADJOURN Commissioner Wicklund moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to adjourn the August 4, 2021, Planning Commission Meeting at 7:36 p.m. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). Page 1 of 3 PC AGENDA ITEM – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-022 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: City of Arden Hills Request: Zoning Code Amendment – Chapter 13 – Section 1325.07 Subd. 6.A Requested Action The City of Arden Hills is proposing ordinance language in the Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance that will add new language and amend ordinance language to allow for the keeping of chickens in the City. Background Starting in 2020, the City Council began discussions on ordinance language with regards to the keeping of chickens in Arden Hills. A survey was conducted in November 2020 to garner input from residents on the relaxation of standards for the keeping of chickens. Those survey results were presented to the City Council at a work session in January. Staff was provided guidance on general parameters for consideration of a proposed chickens ordinance. That draft language was reviewed by the City Council at two work sessions on July 12th and July 26th, 2021. In preparing the draft ordinance language, the City deferred to the document that is used by a number of adjacent communities titled “Recommendations for Municipal Regulation of Urban Chickens”. This guide was the basis for development of ordinance standards and best practices for licensing requirements. Similar to the Cities of Stillwater and Falcon Heights, the proposed language includes a requirement that a resident who intends to keep chickens shall have read the document outlining best care practices. At the July 26th special work session, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission in September for the first review and to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the keeping of chickens. Following the public hearing, the draft ordinance language with recommendation of the Planning Commission would be brought back to the City Council at a future meeting for subsequent discussion and direction on next steps. Page 2 of 3 Overview of Ordinance Amendments Staff has prepared draft ordinance language with new language added in red font for your review (Attachment A). Language has been incorporated into the City ordinances to allow for the keeping of chickens and added requirements for the associated accessory structures/uses (i.e. coop, pen, and exercise yard). Those regulations are referenced in two Chapters of the city code. The applicable Chapters and Sections are as follows: • Municipal Code Chapter 4 – Animals and Pets o Amend - Section 400.01, Definitions o Add - Section 410.01 Subd. 3, Chickens License • Zoning Code Chapter 1325 – General Regulations o Amend – Section 1325.07 Subd. 6.A., Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals The following are a few of the summary items of the proposed ordinance amendments: • Biannual license requirement for the keeping of chickens. • Limitation on number of chickens allowed – maximum 3 hens, roosters prohibited. • Insertion of size limitations for coop, pen, and exercise yard – coop shall be 12 to 25 sq. ft., pen minimum 10 sq. ft. per bird, and exercise yard minimum 174 sq. ft. per bird. • Notification for Neighbor Consent. • Spacing and screening requirements between adjacent parcels and the area dedicated to chickens – closer to principal dwelling than adjacent property, 6 ft. tall perimeter screening of solid fence or vegetation. • Exemption for an allowance of a third accessory structure with a single car detached garage. • Penalty and removal language for violations and/or discontinuance of chickens. The Planning Commission may notice that the proposed ordinance language refers to the fee schedule for the license amount. Changes and adoption of rates within the fee schedule does not require review of the Commission. The City Council consensus during the work session discussion has been a biannual license amount of $30.00. An ordinance amendment shall be brought forward to the City Council for the fee schedule in parallel to the ordinance review. Lastly, an ordinance amendment to the Zoning Code does require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Additional Review N/A Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: Page 3 of 3 General Findings: 1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language to allow for the keeping of chickens. 2. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning Code of the City Code. 3. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. • Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-022 as presented (or as modified by Planning Commission) for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to add ordinance language within Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals for requirements to allow chicken coops in residential districts including Municipal Code language as amended to Chapter 4 as presented in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. • Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to add ordinance language within Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals for requirements to allow chicken coops in residential districts including Municipal Code language as amended to Chapter 4: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial. • Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-018 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to add ordinance language within Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals for requirements to allow chicken coops in residential districts including Municipal Code language as amended to Chapter 4: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notices A Zoning Code Amendment requires a public hearing. Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Attachments A. Draft Ordinance Language B. Recommendations for Municipal Regulation of Urban Chickens 400.01 Definitions. The following definitions shall be used in the application and interpretation of the provisions of this chapter: ή Animal. Any non-human mammal, reptile, amphibian, or bird. ή Animal Control Officer. An individual or employee of a business retained by the City for purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Chapter; or a member of the City's law enforcement agency. ή Animal, Domestic. Animals kept within the home as pets, such as fish, dogs, cats, household bird, and similar animals. ή Animal, Non-Domestic. Animals which are kept outside the home for purposes of food or pleasure such as cattle, hogs, horses, bees, sheep, goats, chickens, birds, such as falcons and pigeons, and similar animals. ή Animal, Wild. Any animal which is of a species not usually domesticated and of a species which, due to size, wild nature or other characteristics, is dangerous to humans and would ordinarily be confined in a zoo or found in the wild. The term includes but is not limited to: ή Animals and birds, the keeping of which is licensed by the state or federal government, such as wolves, raptors, and pheasants. ή Eagles, ocelots, jaguars, cougars, weasels, wild ferrets, badgers, monkeys, chimpanzee, deer, and bison. ή Crossbreeds of wild animals and domesticated animals such as the cross between dogs and coyotes and dogs and wolves. ή Any large cat of the family Felidae, such as lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, cougars and ocelots, except commonly accepted domesticated house cats. ή Any member of the family Canidae, such as wolves, coyotes, dingoes, and jackals, except domesticated dogs. ή Any poisonous snake such as a rattlesnake, coral snake, water moccasin, puff adder, or cobra. ή Any snake or reptile which by its size, vicious nature or other characteristic is dangerous to human beings. ή Any skunk, raccoon, or fox whether captured in the wild, domestically raised, descented or not descented, vaccinated against rabies or not vaccinated against rabies. ή Any bear, ape, gorilla, monkey, or badger. ή Any other animal or reptile which is commonly considered wild. ή At Large. An unattended animal on public property; or an unattended animal on private property without the consent of the property owner. ή Cat. Any domesticated feline animal, male or female, whole or neutered. ή Coop. An accessory structure for the keeping or housing of chickens permitted by the ordinance. ή Dangerous Dog. Any dog that has committed any of the acts set forth below: Attachment A ή Without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property; ή Killed a domestic animal without provocation; or ή A potentially dangerous dog which aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. ή Dog. Any canine animal, male or female, whole or neutered. ή Enclosure. Any structure, except a dwelling, designed to securely enclose and prevent an animal from escaping therefrom. ή Proper Enclosure. Proper Enclosure means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing protection from the elements for the animal. A Proper Enclosure does not include a porch, patio, or any part of a house, garage or other structure that would allow the animal to exit of its volition, or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which door or window screens are the only obstacles that prevent the dog from exiting. ή Exercise yard. Is a larger fenced area adjacent to chicken coop and pen that provides space for exercise and foraging for the birds when supervised. ή Hen. Is a female chicken. ή Owner. Any person, firm, or corporation, organization or department possessing, harboring, keeping, having an interest in or having custody or control of an animal. ή Pen. A fully enclosed and covered area attached to a coop where the chickens can roam unsupervised. ή Potentially Dangerous Dog. Any dog that has committed any of the acts set forth below: ή When unprovoked, bites a human or domestic animal; ή When unprovoked, chases or approaches a person upon the streets, sidewalks or any other public property in an apparent attitude of attack; or ή Has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. ή Restrained. On a leash of not more than six (6) feet in length or on a leash which can be retracted to a length of six (6) feet or less, and in the custody of a person of sufficient age to adequately control the animal; in a vehicle; or confined to the owner's property by enclosure or fencing. ή Rooster. Is a male chicken. ή Substantial Bodily Harm. Bodily injury which involves a temporary but substantial disfigurement, or which causes a temporary but substantial loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ, or which causes a fracture of any bodily member. Section 410 - Licenses 410.01 License Required. The following animal licenses shall be required within the City of Arden Hills. Subd. 1 Dog/Cat Licenses. All dogs and cats within the City of Arden Hills, except as hereinafter provided, shall be licensed. A. Application. Within thirty (30) days after acquiring possession of a dog or cat which has not been licensed by the City of Arden Hills, the owner of the dog or cat shall make application for a dog or cat license. The application shall be on forms provided by the City of Arden Hills. B. Vaccination. It shall be unlawful for any dog or cat owner to keep or maintain any dog or cat older than six (6) months of age unless it shall have been vaccinated with an anti-rabies vaccine certified to be effective by a licensed veterinarian. No license renewal shall be issued except upon compliance with this section. C. License Fee. The license fee for each dog or cat must be submitted with the application. The fee will be established by City Council Resolution. D. Duration of License. A license shall be issued for a period of time not to exceed the expiration date of the rabies vaccination. No dog or cat license shall be renewed without proof of vaccination. E. Issuance of License. Upon completion of the application form, receipt of the license fee and receipt of the proof of vaccination, the City Administrator shall cause a dog or cat license to be issued to the applicant for a particular dog or cat. F. Receipt and Tags. The City of Arden Hills shall issue a license fee receipt to the applicant along with a metallic dog or cat license tag. The applicant shall permanently affix the tag by a metal fastening device to the collar of the licensed animal in a manner that allows the tag to be easily observed. If a tag is lost, a duplicate may be issued by the City of Arden Hills upon presentation of a receipt showing payment of the initial license fee and upon payment of an additional fee for each duplicate tag. G. Change of Address. An applicant who has obtained a dog or cat license shall notify the City of the applicant's address changes within the corporate limits of the City within ten (10) days of any address change. H. Counterfeit Tags. No person shall counterfeit or attempt to counterfeit dog or cat license tags. I. Transfer of Tags. No person shall transfer a dog or cat tag from one dog or cat to another. J. Exceptions. The following dogs and cats are not required to be licensed: 1. Dogs and cats less than six (6) months of age. 2. Dogs and cats whose owners are temporary visitors within the City for thirty (30) days or less. 3. Dogs and cats which are brought into the City for appearance in an animal show. 4. Dogs being used by law enforcement officers Subd. 2 Wild Animal Licenses. A. General Prohibition. All wild animals except the following are prohibited within the City of Arden Hills: 1. Wild animals brought into the City for entertainment, exhibition or show purposes by persons keeping wild animals for a public zoo. 2. Wild animals which are part of a permanent display sponsored by a bona fide research institution, a veterinary hospital, public zoo or other institution. 3. Nonpoisonous snakes, birds kept indoors, hamsters, mice, rabbits, gerbils, white rats, guinea pigs, chinchillas, or lizards and similar small animals capable of being kept in cages continuously. 4. Monkeys trained as personal helpers and kept by handicapped persons. 5. Raptors owned by licensed Falconers holding valid state and federal Falconry permits so long as the conditions of such permits are being satisfied. 6. Wild animals and birds that are part of the natural habitat and environment. B. License Application. Applications for a Wild Animal License shall be submitted on forms provided by the City along with a Certificate of Insurance which indicates that applicant has $200,000 of liability coverage on the Wild Animal and which includes an endorsement indicating that the liability coverage will not be cancelled without twenty (20) days written notice to the City of Arden Hills. C. Investigation. The Animal Control Officer shall review the application, conduct such investigation as the Animal Control Officer deems necessary, and shall prepare a written recommendation regarding the issuance of a Wild Animal License. The City Administrator shall within ten (10) days mail a notice to all property owners within 350 feet of the site on which the Wild Animal will be kept. The notice shall indicate that the City has received an application for a Wild Animal License and shall request comments from such property owners. D. Review. The City Council shall review the application, the Animal Control Officer's recommendations, and the comments from property owners. The City Council may issue a Wild Animal License if it determines that the application is in compliance with the City's regulations. The City Council may attach any reasonable conditions to the issuance of a license as it determines to be necessary in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of Arden Hills residents. E. Existing Wild Animals. Anyone keeping a Wild Animal in Arden Hills at the time of the adoption of this regulation shall have ninety (90) days in which to comply with the provisions of this regulation or otherwise remove the Wild Animal from the City. Extensions beyond ninety (90) days may be granted by the City Council for good cause but in no case shall such extension permanently exempt a person from the requirements of this regulation. F. Wild Animal Restrictions. 1. Confinement. No person owning or harboring or having the care or custody of a wild animal shall suffer or permit such animal to go unconfined on the premises of such person. A wild animal is "unconfined" as the term is used in this section if such animal is not securely confined indoors or confined in a secure enclosure suitably sized for the wild animal is confined therein. An "enclosure" is secure within the meaning of this section if it is constructed of heave gauge mesh steel, or other suitable material; consists of a top and sides, with the bottom of such sides fastened along their perimeter to a slab floor of concrete or other suitable material; where no slab floor is provided, the sides must be embedded into the ground no less than one foot; all access points of the enclosure must be locked when the animal is confined therein. The Animal control officer may seize a wild animal that has been declared dangerous that is unconfined. 2. Muzzling. No person owning or harboring, or having the care of a wild animal shall suffer or permit such animal to go beyond the premises of such person unless such animal is securely muzzled and restrained with a chain not exceeding three (3) feet in length, and having a tensile strength sufficient to restrain the animal. Wild animals which are actively participating in recognized local, regional or national trials, training or other such sponsored competition, need not to be muzzled while being transported to or from during such competitions. 3. Summary Destruction. Any person harboring or owning a wild animal that is found to be in violation of the City's Animal Control Regulations may be summarily destroyed. Subd. 3 Chickens License. All chickens within the City of Arden Hills, except as hereinafter provided, shall be licensed. A. Application. Within thirty (30) days after acquiring possession of a chicken which has not been licensed by the City of Arden Hills, the owner of the chicken(s) shall make application for a chickens license. The application shall be on forms provided by the City of Arden Hills. If the Applicant is a renter, the Property Owner signature shall be required on the license application form. B. Neighbor Consent. The Applicant shall be responsible for providing notification to the neighbors immediately adjacent to the property of their intent to keep chickens. This notification will be distributed in the format provided by the City. Neighbor written responses will be returned to the City. Neighbor consent from all of the immediately adjacent properties is required for issuance of the license. The failure of a neighboring Property Owner to respond does not constitute consent. C. License Fee. The license fee for each chicken must be submitted with the application. The fee will be established by City Council Resolution. D. Duration of License. A biannual license shall be issued. E. Issuance of License. Upon completion of the application form and receipt of the license fee, the City Administrator shall cause a chicken license to be issued to the applicant subject to: (1) Leg banding of all chickens is required. The bands must identify the owner and the owner’s address and telephone number. (2) Dead chickens must be disposed of according to the Minnesota Board of Animal Health rules which require chicken carcasses to be disposed of as soon as possible after death, usually within forty-eight (48) to seventy-two (72) hours. Legal forms of chicken carcass disposal include burial, off-site incineration or rendering, or composting. (3) Prior to issuance of a license, the prospective annual license holder certifies as part of the application review that they have read “Recommendations for Municipal Regulations for Urban Chickens”. F. The following are prohibited within the City of Arden Hills for chickens: 1. Roosters are prohibited. 2. No breeding of chickens is allowed. 3. Slaughtering of chickens on the property is prohibited. 1325.07 Performance Standards. Subd. 1 Maintenance. A. Health and Safety. In all districts, all buildings and structures, including fences and required landscaping, shall be maintained so as not to be unsightly or present harmful health or safety conditions. B. Snow Removal. In all districts, it shall be the responsibility of the residential and/or business land owner to insure proper snow removal from the sidewalks within twenty-four (24) hours after the last accumulation of two (2) inches or more. Subd. 2 Refuse. A. Containment. In all districts, any waste materials, debris, refuse or garbage shall be stored and kept in accordance with the requirements of Section 660.05 of the City Municipal Code, as the same may be amended from time to time. B. Noxious Weeds and Objectionable Plant Growth. Land shall be kept free of noxious weeds and unsightly or objectionable plant growth of eight (8) inches or more in height. C. Home Interiors. Home interiors shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition free of any accumulation of rubbish and garbage in compliance with State Health Regulations. D. Compliance Deadline. Existing uses shall comply with these provisions within thirty (30) days following the effective date of this Code. Subd. 3 Exterior Storage. A. Residential Districts. 1. Materials and Equipment. All materials and equipment shall be stored within a building or be fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining lots, except for the following: Laundry drying and recreational equipment, construction and landscaping materials currently (within a period of twelve (12) months) being used on the premises; agricultural materials and equipment if these are used or intended for use on the premises; off-street parking of passenger cars and pickup trucks. 2. Boats, Trailers and Utility Vehicles. Exterior storage of boats, trailers and utility vehicles is not permitted in any residential district, except as regulated in Section 1325.12. B. Business and Industrial Districts. 1. Screening. All exterior storage in the business and industrial districts shall be screened from public view, except materials and equipment currently being used for on- site construction. 2. Parking. Vehicles, including but not limited to cars, trucks, buses and RV's parked and/or stored in public view for more than a period of seven (7) days shall be prohibited unless allowed by the permitted business or industrial use, except as regulated in Section 1325.12. Subd. 4 Electrical and Radiation Emissions. No activities shall be permitted that emit dangerous radioactivity beyond an enclosed area. There shall be no electrical disturbance adversely affecting the operation at any point of any equipment other than that of the creator of such disturbances. Subd. 5 Environmental Pollution. Emission or creation of noise, odors, vibrations, glare, dust, smoke, heat and toxic or noxious fumes shall conform to such standards as are from time to time established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. None of these shall be at a level that is objectionable to surrounding properties. Subd. 6 Animals. A. Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals. Any building in which farm animals are kept shall be located a distance of two hundred (200) feet or more from any lot line. Any open structure in which farm animals are kept shall be a distance of four hundred (400) feet or more from any lot line., except for chicken coops in the R-1, R- 2, and R-3 Districts provided the following requirements are met: 1. No more than three (3) hens shall be housed or kept on any one (1) residential lot with the issuance of a City license. 2. A separate coop is required to house the chickens. Coops must be constructed and maintained to meet the following minimum standards: a. A coop with a minimum of 12 square feet and no larger than 25 square feet is permitted as an accessory structure subject to Section 1325.01. Subd. 4 A. for Size. b. Exemption to Ordinance - A residential property with a single car detached garage and an accessory structure/shed will be allowed a third accessory structure for keeping chickens. The combined square footage of all three detached structures may not exceed 728 square feet. c. Located in the rear yard. Chicken Coop, pen, and exercise yard are not permitted in the front or side yard. d. Setbacks are subject to applicable accessory structure setbacks of the underlying zoning district. In no instance shall the coop be located in front of the rear building line of the principal structure. e. The outer limit of coop including pen and exercise yard shall be located closer to the principal dwelling upon the property that is issued a license than any other residential dwelling on an abutting property. f. Climate control – adequate ventilation and/or insulation to maintain the coop temperature between 45 – 85 degrees Fahrenheit. Prior to issuance of an annual license, the prospective annual license holder must provide a plan for maintaining an adequate temperature in the coop for safety of the fowl or poultry. The plan must address both extreme winter and summer temperature conditions. g. Rodent proof – coop construction and materials must be adequate to prevent access by rodents. h. Coops shall be constructed and maintained in a workmanlike manner. (4) A pen and exercise yard is required. Pen and exercise yard must be constructed and maintained to meet the following minimum standard: x The pen and exercise yard is located adjacent to the coop and shall be fenced with adequate coverage to keep hens in and predators out of a material that can be easily raked or regularly replaced to reduce odor and flies. x Minimum size per bird shall be: 1) Pen – 10 square feet of floor space 2) Exercise yard - 174 square feet (5) Screening shall be installed around the perimeter of the area dedicated for the keeping of chickens in a manner that minimizes view from adjacent parcels. A screening plan shall be approved as part of license application subject to any additional permit requirements for installation. Acceptable forms of screening are a six (6) foot tall solid fence or vegetation that shall consist of plantings which shall provide for year round screening and installed at a minimum of six (6) feet tall. (6) Chickens must not be housed in a residential house or an attached or detached garage. (7) All premises on which hens are kept or maintained shall be kept clean from filth, garbage, and any substances which attract rodents. The coop and its surrounding must be cleaned frequently enough to control odor. Manure shall not be allowed to accumulate in a way that causes an unsanitary condition or causes odors detectible on another property. Failure to comply with these conditions may result in the officer removing chickens from the premises or revoking a chicken license. (8) All grain and food stored for the use of the hens on a premise with a chicken license shall be kept in a rodent proof container. (9) Hens, coop, pen, and exercise yard shall not be kept in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance to the occupants of adjacent property. (10) Any violation of the above conditions, (i.e. roaming chickens, uncontrolled odor), if not remedied within 10 days, may result in revocation of the homeowner’s license. (11) If the license holder discontinues having chickens, the homeowner shall have 60 days to remove the coop, pen, and exercise yard associated with the keeping of chickens in its entirety. If the coop was licensed as an allowed third accessory structure for chickens, the coop/third structure must be removed and cannot be repurposed for a storage structure. If the homeowner/license holder fails to perform either of the above, the City may enter upon the subject property, remove the coop, pen, and exercise yard from the homeowner’s property, and charge the amount back to the homeowner as an assessment on the property tax roll. B. Number of Animals Allowed. Up to four (4) domestic animals, excluding birds and fish, are permitted in any dwelling unit, but without a residential dog kennel license not more than two (2) may be dogs. Up to three (3) dogs are allowed with a residential dog kennel license. Dog enclosures may be located only in a rear yard in all zoning districts. C. Animals for Research. Animals for research may be kept in appropriate places by conditional use permit. D. Wild Animals. Wild animals are not permitted in any district. Subd. 7 Site Grading. A. Erosion Prevention. Earth surfaces shall be planted or stabilized to prevent erosion. B. Drainage onto Neighboring Property. Finished slopes and grades shall not cause adverse drainage effects on adjoining properties. chickenrunrescue.org Page 1 9/14/15                 RECOMMENDATIONS  FOR  MUNICIPAL   REGULATION  OF  URBAN  CHICKENS   For  distribution  to  public  and  permit  applicants             SUMMARY  OF  RECOMMENDATIONS  (page  2)   BASIC  CHICKEN  CARE  INSTRUCTIONS        (page  3-­‐9)   REQUIREMENTS  FOR  KEEPING  CHICKENS  (page  10)           Mary  Britton  Clouse   Chicken  Run  Rescue   2014       Endorsed  by   Chicken Run Rescue Eastern Shore Sanctuary and Education Center Farm Sanctuary The Humane Society of the United States Sunnyskies Bird and Animal Sanctuary United Poultry Concerns Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary Used  by   Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN Cottage Grove, MN Stillwater, MN Falcon Heights, MN     chickenrunrescue.org Page 2 9/14/15       OVERVIEW  OF  RECOMMENDATIONS   •  Do  not  permit         If  permitted:   •  Permit  as  pets  only   •  Do  NOT  prohibit  roosters   •  Prohibit  slaughter,  breeding,  sale  or  barter   •  Limit  number  of  birds  to  5  or  fewer   •  Require  100%  consent  of  neighbors       •  WRITTEN  guidelines  for  care       •  Cap  number  of  permits     •  Allot  for  additional  administrative  staff  and  resources     •  Allot  for  enforcement  and  capture  training                                   chickenrunrescue.org Page 3 9/14/15   BASIC  CHICKEN  CARE  INSTRUCTIONS       CONSIDERATIONS  BEFORE  ACQUIRING  A  CHICKEN   lifespan   -­‐  Chickens  can  live  as  long  as  a  dog  or  cat-­‐  up  to  14  years  or  longer.     -­‐  Egg  laying  for  a  hen  generally  starts  at  6  months  old,  peaks  at  18  months  and  declines  with   development  of  reproductive  disease.   cost   -­‐  Start  Up  costs    for  coop,  maintenance,  tools,  cleaning,  equipment,  heating  /  cooling  appliances,  dishes,   nets,  food  storage,  scale,  fencing,  security  locks,  lighting,  motion  detectors,  monitors,  cameras,  permit   application  ($2-­‐3,000)   -­‐  Annual  supplies  per  bird  for  food,  bedding,  nutritional  supplements,  hygiene  supplies,  permit  fee,   utilities  ($300)   -­‐  Vet  care  per  bird  per  service  (office  exam  $66,  fecal  test  $28,  plus  other  services  as  needed  for  illness   or  injury).  Are  you  able  to  provide  the  birds  with  proper  veterinary  care  needed?   time   -­‐  Average  1  hour  per  bird  per  day    minimum  for  cleaning,  parasite  control,  grooming,  physical  exam,   travel  time  to  purchase  supplies,  construction,  repair,  medication,  feeding,  supervise  free  time  out  of   pen.   -­‐  Chickens  need  to  be  tended  to  twice  daily.  Will  you  have  a  person  ready  to  substitute  for  you  when  you   have  reason  to  be  absent?   space     At  least  a  6’W  x  12’L  x  6’H  space  in  a  yard  is  needed  for  a  coop  and  pen  for  4  birds  in  addition  to  a  larger   fenced  area  for  regular  exercise.   location   Coop  and  pen  should  be  located  in  an  area  that  provides  shade,  direct  sunlight,  good  drainage  and   protection  from  prevailing  winds  and  will  not  present  a  problem  to  neighbors.   uninvited  guests   Chickens  will  attract  bird  mites  and  lice,  mice,  yard  birds,  squirrels,  raccoons,  dogs,  coyotes,  fox,  mink,   opossum,  rats,  owls,  bobcats,  hawks,  snakes,  weasels,  ferrets,  fisher,  marten  and  humans.     ACQUIRING  A  CHICKEN   ADOPTION  OR  PURCHASE/BREEDING?   The  recent  interest  in  having  chickens  has  overwhelmed  animal  rescue  organizations  with  inquiries  from   people  wanting  to  give  up  chickens  who  are  no  longer  wanted.  Like  all  other  animals  surrendered  to   shelters,  rescue  organizations  cannot  help  them  all.  There  are  never  enough  homes  for  displaced   animals  so  adoption  of  birds  who  need  homes  is  always  the  kindest  choice  instead  of  purchase  from  a   breeder  or  hatchery.   adoption-­‐  By  adopting  from  a  rescue  organization  or  a  private  individual,  you  can  know  what  to  expect   with  regard  to  the  bird’s  health,  sex,  behavior  and  personality.  Reputable  rescue  organizations  can   provide  advice  on  selecting  the  right  bird,  care  information  and  generally  have  a  generous  return  policy   to  insure  that  bird  will  be  happy,  compatible  and  well  cared  for.   purchase/breeding-­‐  The  identification  of  the  sex  of  chicks  by  feed  stores,  breeders  and  hatcheries  is   often  wrong  and  not  apparent  until  the  bird  is  6  months  old.  50%  of  the  chicks  hatched  are  roosters  who   are  killed  or  otherwise  discarded  of  as  waste.  Newborn  chicks  shipped  through  the  postal  service  are   deprived  of  their  mothers,  warmth  and  food.  The  younger  the  bird  the  more  fragile  and  difficult  they  are   to  care  for.     chickenrunrescue.org Page 4 9/14/15     HEALTHY  BIRD  CHECKLIST   Eyes:  clear,  clean,  wide  open,  alert   Face  /  comb  /  wattle:  clean,  soft,  blemish  free,  healthy  deep  red  indicating  good  blood  supply,  (some   faces  are  not  red)   Posture:  head  erect,  good  balance,  stand  or  perch  on  both  feet  on  extended  legs,  good  grip  on  perch,   facing  activity   Odor:  none  or  slightly  fermented  hay   Beak  /  nostrils:  clean,  uniform,  shiny  and  solid   Legs  /  feet:  clean,  shiny,  uniform  scales  and  nails,  foot  bottom  soft  and  blemish  free,  legs  and  toes   straight  and  functional   Feathers;  clean,  bright,  shiny,  smooth  or  fluffy,  free  of  mites  or  lice   Wings:  held  close  to  body,  symmetrical,  smooth  movement  in  joints  when  flexed,  flight  feathers  intact   Skin:  clean,  soft,  pale  pink  and  translucent  (some  breeds  have  bare  red  patches  at  shoulders  and  keel),   free  of  mites  or  lice   Droppings:  70%  odorless  green/  white,  firm,  30%  stinky  brown  pasty  (cecal),  watery  if  stressed   Keel  (sternum):  Straight,  good  muscle  mass  on  either  side,  lump  free   Crop  (on  bird’s  right  side  of  lower  neck):  full,  contents  of  consumed  food  easily  palpated   Vent:  petite,  clean,  moist,  soft,  pliant   Respiration:  12-­‐37  per  min.,  inspiration  louder  and  shorter  than  expiration,  minimal  chest  movement,   closed  beak     NUMBER  OF  BIRDS   Calculating  available  space,  time,  and  cost  (see  above)  will  dictate  how  many  birds  can  be  properly  cared   for:   coop:  4  sq.  feet  of  floor  space  minimum  per  bird  for  the  interior  (an  area  2  ft.  x  2  ft.  per  bird)   pen:    10  sq.  ft  of  floor  space  minimum  per  bird  (an  area  3  ft.  x  3.3  ft  per  bird)   range/  exercise  yard:    174  sq.  ft  per  bird  (an  area  about  10  ft.  x  17  ft  per  bird)   A  single  chicken  is  a  sad  chicken.  Plan  to  have  at  least  2-­‐  they  are  flock  animals  and  need  the   companionship  of  other  chickens.  Generally,    3-­‐5  compatible  chickens  can  be  well  maintained  in  a   typical  city  environment.  Individual  bird’s  sex,  age  and  temperament  can  affect  compatibility.  Over   crowding  chickens  is  the  most  common  mistake.  Hens  should  outnumber  roosters.  Sometimes  single   birds  can  thrive  with  a  human  friend  if  they  have  special  needs.  Roosters,    single  or  in  pairs,    are  very   sociable  and  can  make  terrific  companions  if  handled  gently  and  often.         HANDLING  &  RESTRAINT   Never  handle  a  chicken  by  wings,  feet  or  legs.  Herd  bird  to  corner  using  slow  deliberate  movement.   Fast=  predator,  slow  =  less  threat.  Place  hands  over  top  part  of  wings  (shoulders)  and  hold  securely  but   do  not  squeeze.  Pick  up  and  hold  under  arm  to  keep  wings  in  place.  Support  feet  with  other  hand  if  bird   will  tolerate.  To  restrain  for  transport  or  examination,  drape  a  towel  over  shoulders  cape  style  and  wrap   around  body.       TRANSPORTATION   Consider  travel  time  and  avoid  extreme  weather  conditions.  Heat  exhaustion  can  develop  quickly,   interior  car  temps  can  reach  fatal  point  10  minutes.  Medium  sized  hard  pet  carriers  work  well  for     security,  safety,  stress.  Line  with  a  towel,  shredded  paper  or  straw.  Food  is  a  good  stress  reducer.  Offer   wet  food  like  greens  or  cucumber  for  long  trips.         chickenrunrescue.org Page 5 9/14/15 ARRIVAL   If  other  birds  are  already  present,  a  2  week  quarantine  in  a  separate  area  is  recommended  to  watch  for   signs  of  illness  and  parasites.  Avoid  noisy,  high  traffic  areas  and  allow  the  bird  to  acclimate  before   introducing  to  other  birds,  animals  and  family.       PROVIDING  A  GOOD  HOME   NATURAL  HISTORY   It  is  important  to  understand  how  chickens  live  in  the  wild  and  to  provide  them  with  an  environment   that  meets  those  instinctive  physical  and  psychological  needs  as  closely  as  possible.  Chickens  are  all   descended  from  Tropical  Jungle  Fowl  are  adapted  to  living  in  a  natural  habitat  that  is  spacious,  richly   vegetated,  diverse  and  warm.  This  presents  a  particular  challenge  in  a  small  urban  setting  in  a  cold   climate  like  Minnesota.     Flocks  have  a  highly  developed  social  structure  and  depend  on  each  for    companionship  and  security.   Naturalists  have  observed  that  they  can  recognize  and  remember  180  other  individual  flock  members.   They  are  ground  dwelling  birds.  Most  are  capable  of  low  flight  in  short  distances,  smaller  birds  can  fly   higher  and  farther.       In  the  wild  they  roost  in  trees  at  dusk  before  they  sleep  or  to  escape  predators.  They  hide  their  nests  in   cavities  in  the  ground.  The  majority  of  their  waking  hours  are  spent  active,  wide  ranging,  grazing,   foraging  for  food-­‐  plants,  bugs  and  occasionally  small  rodents.  In  their  natural  state.  They  typically  travel   1/2  mile  from  their  roost  each  day.  In  the  wild,  they  are  never  over  crowded-­‐  if  the  population  becomes   to  dense,  members  will  break  off  into  subgroups  and  spread  out.  They  move  on  from  one  area  to   another  which  allows  food  sources  to  regenerate  and  their  waste  is  not  concentrated  in  one  place  and  it   can  decompose  without  health  risk  to  the  flock.     Roosters  alert  the  flock  to  danger,  find  food  and  call  the  hens  to  it  and  stand  guard  as  they  eat.  They   select  and  build  nests  and  will  even  participate  in  caring  for  the  young.  They  also  act  as  peace  keepers  to   intervene  in  disputes  that  can  develop  between  flock  members.  Roosters  will  start  to  crow  and  display   courting  behaviors  at  about  6  months  of  age.  It  is  essential  to  gently  handle  a  rooster  on  a  daily  basis  to   establish  that  you  are  the  flock  leader  (Alpha)  and  maintain  a  well  socialized  companion.     The  hens  spend  their  time  scratching  for  food,  dust  bathing,  preening,  playing  and  napping.  Hens  begin   to  lay  eggs  at  about  6  months  of  age.  Hen  in  the  wild  produce  only  a  few  clutches  of  eggs  a  year  for  the   sole  purpose  of  reproduction.  Domesticated  hens  have  been  bred  to  lay  one  egg  a  day  but  by  18  month   of  age,  egg  laying  frequency  generally  diminishes  and  many  adult  or  senior  hens  stop  laying  altogether.       Chickens  are  sociable,  cheerful  and  intelligent  creatures  who  can  form  lifelong  bonds  with  each  other   and  other  species  including  humans,  dogs  and  cats.  Because  of  their  keen  intelligence  and  instinctive   physical  activity,  they  need  a  stimulating  environment  that  mimics  as  much  as  possible  the  rich  and   diverse  world  nature  designed  them  to  enjoy.       COOP,  PEN,  RANGE/  EXERCISE  YARD   “Housing  and  infrastructure.  The  primary  purpose  of  poultry  housing  is  to  protect  flocks  against  adverse   weather  and  predators  (coyote,  fox,  stray  dogs,  raccoons  and  raptors).  Weather  is  of  critical  concern  in   the  Upper  Midwest,  where  summers  can  be  extremely  hot  and  winters  bitterly  cold.  Housing  must   provide  shade  from  sun  and  cover  from  rain.  It  must  be  able  to  withstand  high  winds  and  snow  loads  if  it   is  to  be  used  for  year-­‐round  operation.  These  basic  housing  considerations  apply  to  all  poultry”   chickenrunrescue.org Page 6 9/14/15 -­‐”Poultry  Your  Way:  A  Guide  to  Management  Alternatives  for  the  Upper  Midwest”,  Minnesota   Department  of  Agriculture,  2005       COOP:  The  house,  closed  structure  or  enclosed  room  which  provides  shelter  from  cold,  heat,  wind,  rain,   snow  and  predators  for  protected  roosting,  nesting,  feeding  and  watering  space.   Construction  &  Materials  –  Coops  can  be  purchased  ready  made  or  in  kits,  constructed  within  an     existing  structure  or  built  from  scratch.  Local  building  codes  should  be  followed  to  prevent  damage  from   snow,  wind,  etc.  NOTE:  rabbit  hutches,  plastic  igloos,  dog  houses  and  such  are  not  appropriate   structures.   Required  features:   size:  4  sq.  feet  of  floor  space  minimum  is  required  per  bird  for  the  interior  (an  area  2  ft.  x  2  ft.  per  bird).   So  4  birds  will  need  a  coop  with  at  least  4  feet  x  4  feet  inside  floor  space  not  including  nest  boxes.   Outside  dimensions  should  be  about  5  feet  by  5  feet  x  6  ft.  high.  Overcrowding  is  the  most  common   cause  of  behavior  problems,  injury  and  disease.  Coop  should  be  high  enough  for  a  human  to  stand  up     comfortably  for  cleaning,  maintenance  and  egg  collection.  It  also  allows  for  additional  roosting.   Temperament  and  social  structures  should  be  taken  into  account,  and  partitions  should  be  available  for   birds  who  are  sick,  injured  or  lower  in  the  pecking  order.   access  to  electricity  is  required  in  free  standing  structures.     floor  –  The  floor  should  not  collect  and  hold  moisture,  be  easy  to  clean,  retain  heat  in  cold  weather  and   exclude  rodents/predators.  A  dirt  floor  draws  heat  away  and  is  not  easy  to  clean  or  rodents/predators   proof.  A  wood  floor  is  adequate  provided  it  is  at  least  a  foot  off  the  ground,  insulated  and  sealed   properly  but  is  difficult  to  sanitize  because  it  is  porous.    a  concrete  floor  is  ideal  since  it  discourages   rodents/predators  and  ids  easy  to  sanitize.  Regardless  of  the  floor  type,  bedding  strewn  on  the  surface  is   needed  is  to  absorb  moist  fecal  matter  and  facilitate  cleaning.  Leaves  or  wood  shavings  work  best  and   can  be  composted  or  easily  bagged  and  disposed  of  as  solid  waste.     walls-­‐  Materials  that  are  resistant  to  moisture  and  mold  and  easily  cleaned  are  best.  Chemically  treated   materials  should  be  nontoxic.  A  good  compound  with  anti  fungal  agents  is  good  for  humid  areas.  Clear   varnish  is  also  good.  Everything  should  be  treated  or  painted  before  it  is  assembled.  Wooden  structures   should  be  draft  free  and  built  with  double  walls  that  have  at  least    1  1/2  inch  insulated  layer  between   them.   roof:    The  coop  roof  should  be  made  of  a  material  that  will  not  collect  and  hold  heat  and  should  be  built   with  double  walls  that  have  at  least  1  1/2  inch  insulated  layer  between  them.  The  roof  surfaced  should   be  covered  with  an  insulating  tar  paper  to  protect  from  heavy  rains.  The  roof  should  be  slightly  inclined,   to  allow  water  to  run  off  and  if  it  overhangs  at  the  front  wall  it  will  protect  from  downpours.  A  few  small   openings  along  the  eaves  allow  moisture  to  escape  and  provide  fresh  air.   doors:  One  human-­‐size  door  is  needed  for  daily  access.  Doors  for  chickens  should  be  just  large  enough   for  the  largest  bird  and  can  be  positioned  anywhere  from  ground  level  to  about  2  feet  high  with  a  stable   ramp  with  cleats.  Chickens  are  ground  dwellers,  not  parrots-­‐small  doors  at  heights  greater  than  3  feet     with  flimsy,  unstable  ladders  are  not  appropriate.  Doors  must  be  able  to  be  secured  against  predators  at   night.   windows:  Chickens  love  windows  and  need  natural  light.  Double  glaze  for  warmth.  Cover  with  1/2”   metal    screen  so  they  can  be  opened  for  ventilation  in  hot  weather.  Allow  one  square  foot  of  window  for   each  10  square  foot  of  floor  space.   roosts:  Lumber  or  branches  can  be  used.  They  should  be  strong  enough  and  mounted  securely  enough   to  hold  all  birds.  The  surface  should  be  rough  for  good  grip  with  no  splinters  or  sharp  edges.  For  medium   sized  birds,  2”  or  4  “  flat  or  1  1/2”  diameter  is  best  for  foot  comfort.  The  longer  roost  the  better  to   prevent  competition.  They  should  be  set  18”  from  wall,  2  -­‐3  feet  off  the  floor.  If  mounted  higher,  rung   steps  are  needed  spaced  8-­‐12  inches  apart.  The  addition  of  a  dropping  board  underneath  and  elevated   roost  will  collect  droppings  and  keep  floor  space  below  clean  and  inhabitable.   climate:  Shelters  should  be  kept  at  a  comfortable  temperature  for  the  animals.  “Minimum  Temperature   55°(f)  ,  maximum  temperature  70°(F)”         chickenrunrescue.org Page 7 9/14/15 -­‐”Poultry  Your  Way:  A  Guide  to  Management  Alternatives  for  the  Upper  Midwest”,  Minnesota   Department  of  Agriculture,  2005     The  coop  should  be  heated  to  maintain  a  temperature  above  32  degrees  during  the  coldest  part  of  the   winter  and  cooled  below  85  in  the  hottest  part  of  the  summer.   Below  32  degrees  birds  are  uncomfortable  and  cannot  maintain  body  temperature.  Below  15  degrees   frostbite  begins,  and  hypothermia  increases.  Oil  or  water  filled  safety  heaters  (i.e.  brands  Pelonis,   DeLonghi,  Honeywell)  are  completely  closed  and  sealed  systems  that  run  on  electricity.  The  oil  is  heated   from  within  and  the  heat  is  radiant  so  there  are  no  exposed  heating  elements  that  create  dangerous   problems  even  if  they  tip  over.  Heat  lamps  should  only  be  used  with  extreme  caution  and  be  firmly   attached  at  least  3  feet  from  animals  and  far  from  any  flammable  item,  especially  dry  straw  or  bedding.   Smoke  alarms  are  highly  recommended.  Extra  bedding  should  be  available  to  keep  animals  warm  and   comfortable  in  cold  seasons.     Between  75  and  85  degrees,  panting  and  dehydration  begin,  above  85  heat  stress  and  danger  of  heat   prostration  increases.     ventilation-­‐  Doors,  windows  and  vents  near  the  ceiling    supply  oxygen,  remove  heat  from  breathing,   remove  moisture  from  breath  and  droppings,  harmful  gasses  and  dust  particles,  and  dilute  disease   causing  airborne  organisms.  Fans  should  be  provided  for  hottest  weather.   light:  Natural  light  from  windows  and/or  skylights  is  required.  Can  be  supplemented  with  full  spectrum   incandescent  light  to  follow  normal  seasonal  light  cycles  and  for  cleaning  and  maintenance.  The   minimum  light  intensity  you  should  provide  should  be  enough  to  clearly  see  the  hens  feed  when   standing  over  the  feeder.     feeders:  Food  receptacles  should  be  made  of  non-­‐corrosive  material  that  is  easily  cleaned  minimizes   spillage,  prevents  contamination  with  droppings  and  keeps  food  dry.  The  containers  should  be  large   enough  for  all  the  birds  to  comfortably  eat  at  once  or  numerous  enough  to  prevent  competition  or   intimidation.  Large  heavy  rubber  feed  buckets  work  nicely.  Hanging  dishes  or  feeders  work  as  well  and   should  be  hung  at  about  the  level  of  the  bird’s  back.  If  dishes  are  outside  the  coop,  they  should  be  set   under  an  overhang  to  keep  them  dry  when  it  rains.   waterers:  Water  receptacles  should  be  made  of  non-­‐corrosive  material  that  can  be  cleaned  and   disinfected  with  a  solution  of  chlorine  bleach,  prevent  contamination  with  droppings  and  is  spill  and  leak   proof.  The  containers  should  be  large  enough  for  all  the  birds  to  comfortably  drink  at  once  and  hold   enough  water  for  all  birds  for  an  entire  day.  They  should  be  slightly  positioned  higher  than  the  feeder  or   far  enough  away  to  prevent  contamination  with  food.   nestboxes-­‐  One  nest  box  for  every  3  hens.  A  12”W  x  12”D  x  14”H  is  most  versatile.  Chickens  prefer   wooden  nest  boxes  with  covered  opening  for  privacy  placed  on  or  as  low  to  the  floor  as  possible.  If  set   higher  they  require  a  perch  in  front  of  the  opening.  They  should  be  filled  with  2-­‐4  inches  of  straw.  litter     or  grass.    They  prefer  to  nest  in  the  South  East  corner  of  the  structure  whenever  possible.     PEN:  The  fenced  area  surrounding  the  coop  that  provides  secure  access  to  exercise,  sunlight,  earth  and   vegetation  and  is  freely  available  to  the  birds  when  they  are  unsupervised.  It  is  constructed  to  prevent   the  bird’s  escape  and  prevents  entry  by  intruders/predators.   Construction  &  Materials  –  Kennel  pens  can  be  purchased  ready  made  or    in  kits,  or  built  from  scratch.   Local  building  codes  should  be  followed  to  prevent  damage  from  snow,  wind,  etc.    Temperament  and   social  structures  of  flock  should  be  taken  into  account,  and  partitions  should  be  available  for  birds  who   are  sick,  injured  or  lower  in  the  pecking  order.   Required  features:   size:  10  sq.  ft  of  floor  space  minimum  per  bird  (an  area  3  ft.  x  3.3  ft  per  bird)  is  required  so  4  birds  will   need  floor  space  of  at  least  6  feet  x  7  feet.  If  the  coop  is  adjacent  to  the  pen  at  least  a  6  x  12  foot  space   in  a  yard  is  needed.  If  the  coop  is  elevated  2  feet  so  the  chickens  can  use  the  space  underneath,  the   coop  and  pen  can  occupy  some    but  not  all  of  the  same  footprint.  If  most  of  the  pen  is  in  deep  shade  all   of  the  time  it  would  be  conducive  to  unhealthy  bacteria  and  fungal  development.  The  pen  should  be   chickenrunrescue.org Page 8 9/14/15 high  enough  for  you  to  stand  up    comfortably  for  cleaning,  maintenance,  capture  and  also  allows  for   additional  roosting.   substrate-­‐  Choose  a  well  drained  area.  Substrate  material  for  the  pen  should  be  clean,  non-­‐toxic,   biodegradable,  readily  available,  inexpensive  and  replaceable.  Since  it  will  become  compacted  from  little   feet  and  contaminated  by  concentrated  droppings  and  parasites,  it  will  need  to  be  raked  out  and   replaced  frequently  to  reduce  odor  and  fly  activity.  Play  sand,  leaves,  municipal  wood  chips,  sod  and   hard  wearing  ground  cover  work  well.   metal  fencing  /  predator  control:  The  type  of  fencing  depends  on  what  the  most  likely  predators  are  in   your  area.  Dogs,  rats,  raccoons,  hawks  and  coyotes  are  the  most  prevalent  in  city  neighborhoods,  but   others  include  fox,  mink,  opossum,  bobcats,  snakes,  weasels,  ferrets,  fisher  and  marten.  Its  best  to  build   the  strongest  deterrents  possible.  Chain  link  panels  or  welded  or  woven  fencing  on  a  sturdy  frame   reinforced  at  the  bottom  with  small  mesh  metal  wire  that  prevents  predators  from  tunneling  under  the   fence  will  discourage  most  intruders.  Regular  inspection  is  key  to  security.   gate:  A  gate  is  needed  for  easy  human  access.   cover:  Pen  should  be  covered  to  keep  birds  in  and  predators  out.  The  type  of  covering  needed  will   depend  on  the  type  of  predators.  Covering  part  of  the  pen  with  a  roof  such  as  corrugated  fiberglass  can   provide  shade  and  rain  shelter.   windbreak:  Providing  a  wind  and  snow  break  will  give  the  birds  a  protected  area  to  be  outdoors  even  in   winter.   shade:  Shade  must  be  available  and  can  be  provided  by  vegetation  or  strategically  placed  materials.   dustbath:  Taking  a  dust  bath  is  the  closest  thing  to  heaven  for  a  chicken.  They  derive  pleasure  and   contentment  by  bathing  in  the  sun  and    in  loose  dry  soil  depressions  in  the  dirt  which  cleans  their   feathers  and  rids  them  of  parasites.  Birds  will  usually  dig  their  own  hole  for  dust  baths.  Keep  the  soil  in   the  dust  bath  loose  and  add  play  sand  if  it  is  a  heavy  clay  soil.  Adding    a  little  poultry  dust,  diatomaceous   earth  or  wood  ash  increases  the  effectiveness    of  parasite  control.  Large  heavy  rubber  feed  buckets  filled   with  play  sand  are  a  welcome  addition  to  the  indoor  coop  in  the  winter.   enrichment  furnishings:  There  is  nothing  sadder  than  a  barren  pen  when  compared  to  the  rich  jungle   environment  chickens  evolved  in.  Lots  of  large  branches,  stumps  or  platforms  provide  places  to  go  and   things  to  do  and  look  natural  and  attractive  in  the  pen.  Include  bushes,  boxes  or  other  objects  to  sit  in  or   hide  behind.  Plant  kale  or  other  safe,  edible  vegetation  around  the  outside  of  the  pen  for  forage.   Overcrowding,  boredom  and  barren  pens  are  the  most  common  cause  of  behavior  problems.     RANGE/  EXERCISE  YARD:  The  larger  fenced  area  like  a  backyard  that  provides  ample  space  for  safe   exercise,  forage,  sunlight,  earth  and  vegetation  that  is  regularly  available  to  the  birds  when  supervised.   For  regular  exercise,  174  sq.  ft  per  bird  (an  area  about  10  ft.  x  17  ft  per  bird)  is  required.  4  birds  will  need   access  to  a  40  ft.    x  70  ft.  fenced  area  in  the  yard.  If  there  is  no  access  to  a  larger  Range/  exercise  yard,   16  sq.  ft.  of  floor  space  minimum  per  bird  (an  area  4  ft.  x    4  ft  per  bird)  in  the  pen  must  be  provided.     fencing:  6  ft  privacy  fencing  prevents  or  to  discourage  uninvited  human  and  animal  visitors.  and   promotes  the  safety  and  security  of  the  birds  and  neighbors.   nontoxic  plants:  Chickens  are  inquisitive  and  voracious  eaters  of  vegetation  and  many  ornamental     garden  plants  can  be  toxic  to  them  .  Learn  which  of  your  plants  might  be  harmful  and  fence  them  off  or   better  yet  replace  them  with  safe  and    nutritious  plants.   security:  Chickens  are  susceptible  to  theft,  vandalism  and  predators  and  need  to  be  securely  shut  in  the   coop  at  night.  Security  cameras,  lights  and  baby  monitors  are  also  highly  recommended  deterrents.       PROVIDING  GOOD  CARE   FOOD  /  WATER   Fresh  food  and  water  are  required  daily  and  should  be  available  at  all  times.  Hay  ,  grain  and  prepared   feed  should  be  fresh-­‐  less  than  one  year  old  and  free  of  mold,  insects  or  other  contaminants.  Daily   intake  should  include:  60  %  nutritionally  balanced  prepared  feed  appropriate  for  age  of  bird,  20%   chickenrunrescue.org Page 9 9/14/15 scratch  (cracked  corn,  oats,  black  oil  sunflower  seeds,  milo,  barley)  20%  fresh  (nutritious  foods  and  table   scraps-­‐  Caution  toxic:  onion,  avocados,  chocolate)  Supplements:  oyster  shell  or  limestone  for  calcium,   granite  grit  for  digestion,     mineral  salt  or  ground  salt  licks.  Chickens  drink  1-­‐2  cups  of  water  a  day.   Feed  should  be  stored  in  rodent  proof  containers  in  a  cool  dry  area  inaccessible  to  animals.  Stored   feedbags  should  be  rotated  to  ensure  that  feed  is  always  fresh.  Food  that  is  uneaten  or  spilled  should  be   removed  from  animal  enclosures  daily.     SOCIAL  NEEDS  Temperament  and  social  structures  of  animals  should  be  taken  into  account,  and   separate  areas  provided  for  incompatible  birds.     VET  CARE   Locate  a  veterinary  clinic  nearby  that  will  see  chickens  before  one  is  needed.  preferably  one  that   specializes  in  avian  care.  Chickens  are  welcome  in  increasing  numbers  of  city  clinics.  Check  vet   backgrounds  at  http://www.vetmed.state.mn.us/Default.aspx?tabid=803   Have  an  isolation  area  or  roomy  carrier  and  heating  pad  for  sick  or  injured  birds.  Critical/emergency  first   aid  supplies  should  be  kept  including  roll  gauze,  gauze  pads,  tape,  vet  wrap,  blood  stop  powder,   antibiotic  ointment,  antibacterial  scrub  and  solution,  and  bandage  scissors.         SANITATION-­‐  Manure  and  wet  bedding  should  be  removed  from  coop  and  animal  feeding  and  lounging   areas  daily.  Thorough,  complete  cleaning  of  walls  and  perches,  removal  of  all  bedding,  and  disinfecting   of  coop  and  furnishings  should  be  done  at  least  once  a  year.  Keeping  shelter  areas  clean  and  dry  will   help  prevent  bacteria,  fungi,  insects,  rodents,  etc.  Rodent  levels  will  be  minimized  by  keeping  all  feed  in   rodent  proof  containers  and  removing  spilled  or  uneaten  food  promptly.  Litter  can  be  double  bagged   and  disposed  of  as  solid  waste  or  composted  but  must  be  done  in  an  area  where  chickens  will  not   scratch  for  at  least  a  year.   Housing  animals  in  spacious,  clean  and  relatively  dust  free  environments  will  keep  them  healthy  and  will   minimize  human  exposure  to  infectious  disease.           Sources: Poultry Your Way: A Guide to Management Alternatives for the Upper Midwest, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 2005 Standards of Care for Chickens, Adapted from Standards of Care for Farmed Animals , The Association Of Sanctuaries (TAOS). Edited by Chicken Run Rescue. 6/2008, revised 4/7/09 Poultry Housing Considerations for Low Input Small Scale Producers, David Sullenberger, TimeWarrior Farm Chronicle Special Reports, Revision E, Fall, 2003 Building Chicken Coops: Storey Country Wisdom Bulletin A-224, Gail Damerow, 1999 Chicken Health Handbook, Gail Damerow, 1994                   chickenrunrescue.org Page 10 9/14/15 http://www.brittonclouse.com/chickenrunrescue/ Page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  ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 17 PC Agenda Item – 3B MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-019 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. & 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review Requested Action Launch Properties (“The Applicant”), on behalf of Aldi, is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. (“Subject Property”) and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The subject property is currently two lots with one building developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would adjust the existing lot line to the east. This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one 19,480 square foot grocery store and one 5,350 square foot dental/office building. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.48-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site with a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a national dental tenant (~ 2,800 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,500 square feet). The property would be subdivided into two lots. The Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 17 developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary and Final Plat A. Lot Line Adjustment and Planned Unit Development The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. In the B-3 zoning district, proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites shall use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. A PUD promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. The platting process is required to create new parcels of land or to adjust the boundary between two parcels unless otherwise exempted under the ordinance. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 17 The applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed project in further detail and where flexibility is being requested. A complete plan set has been submitted for the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, and Site Plan Review for both lots. Existing Lot Configuration: Proposed Final Plat: Adjusted Lot Line ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 17 The lot area requirements for the B-3 Zoning District are a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and 100 feet of lot width and 130 feet of lot depth. The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. Lot 2 is a corner lot with road frontage along Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. A corner lot shall maintain front yard requirements for each street frontage (i.e. on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the shortest street lot line shall be the front lot line (i.e. Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the longest street lot line shall be a side lot line (i.e. Lexington Avenue). Setback requirements will be reviewed later in this report. B. Park Dedication Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Code (Public Use Dedications) states that the City may require as a condition of approval for a Planned Unit Development the dedication of land, or payment in lieu, and park improvement fees if it is determined the project will result in an increased demand for park land or improvements. In establishing the amount required the City is to take into consideration previous payments or dedications for park purposes. The two lots have been previously developed. The Planning Commission may make a recommendation as to whether or not the proposed development will create an additional demand on park land. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. District Provisions (B-3 Service Business District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Commercial (COM) on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial The Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment E. The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 71,767 295 feet 250 feet Lot 2 37,132 250 feet – Lexington Avenue 139 feet – Grey Fox Road 139 to 151 feet – Lexington Avenue 250 feet – Grey Fox Road ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 17 Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 15% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. Bank/Dental: 19.2 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 ft. Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 ft. – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. Bank/Dental: 21.4 ft. Aldi: 30 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 ft. (east) and 10 ft. (west) Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. Lot 1 – 71,767 sq. ft. Lot 2 - 37,132 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 ft. +/- 29 ft. The proposed development seeks flexibility under the Master Planned Unit Development for the general district provision requirements. 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Building Positioning – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E of the Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The Applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement. The front setback in the B-3 District is 50 feet from the property line. The proposed bank/dental clinic building will be 19.2 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. The Aldi building will be 74 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. As shown in the above table, the Applicant is seeking flexibility for both buildings on the setback requirements in the B-3 District. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 17 B. Exterior Materials – Flexibility Requested At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. Trim and other accent or decorative features may be metal, wood, split faced block, EIFS, or stucco. Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. The Applicant is proposing to construct the two buildings of similar materials and design features which is intended to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The proposed building elevations consist of brick masonry, cedar fiber cement panels and aluminum composite panels with metal coping. The Aldi building design has met the 75% threshold with desired materials on all four elevations. The Planning Commission should make a determination as to whether or not the extent of the aluminum composite panel is acceptable in the building design. On the anchor building for Aldi, the use of aluminum panels ranges from 23% of the east elevation to 14% on the south elevation as a focal design element around the Aldi signage on the building facades. The non-primary facades consists of primarily masonry and cement panels of the total façade area. The transparency requirements for businesses within the B-3 District have been considered in the development and the proposal will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to this standard on the south elevation with 11% of the façade being clear glazing. With regards to the outparcel multi-tenant building design, the City Code requires that façade treatment shall be carried around all side. Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 17 and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are reasonably visible to the general public. Plain flat walls shall not be permitted when viewable from the public right-of-way or public areas. In addition, Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The Planning Commission should review the architectural design of outparcel building for four sided architecture and transparency requirements. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to the design standards. The east elevation will not feature any windows and the use of aluminum panels is a focal design element around tenant signage. The Applicant notes that the outparcel building will consist in the overall design of the building with use of 76% of preferred materials. The north façade is the only elevation to exceed the minimum preferred building requirements at 90%. The south façade (Grey Fox Road) is 73%, the west façade (interior facing) is 72%, and the east façade (Lexington Avenue) is 70%. Two renderings of the building facades for the proposed are provided as part of this report. A full plan set of building elevations for both buildings is included as Attachment F. The figure below identifies the proposed building materials. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 17 C. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires exterior lighting to be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. The proposed plan includes wall mounted lights around the building, and area lights on 25’ poles in the parking lot and drive aisles. The proposed lighting is consistent with the use and the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that identifies type of light fixture, design, and pole heights. As shown on the photometric plan there are two areas along the north and west property line around the Aldi building where lumen levels exceed 0.4 foot candles as measured at the property lines. The subject parcel is not adjacent to a residential property. As a condition of approval, all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. Details about the proposed lighting are found in Attachment H. D. Screening and Fencing – Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. The proposed trash enclosure is located on the north side of the Aldi building, and is proposed to be constructed on three sides using brick with cedar boards for the gates to match materials used on the building. The plans do not identify any rooftop mechanical equipment. Staff recommends including a requirement screening of any rooftop equipment be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets as a condition of approval. E. Landscaping – Seeks Flexibility Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires a minimum landscape lot area of 25 percent in the B-3 District. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of 15 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 17 percent. In their narrative, the Applicant states the project will provide significant landscaped green space along Lexington Avenue at grade level. They’ve noted that there is currently virtually no green space on the property and the proposed development is nearly ¼ acre more landscaping than the existing site. The Applicant is also proposing the addition of 27 trees throughout the site. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way of every 50 feet of public street frontage. The proposed development would be required to plant 14 trees along the Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road right-of-way’s. The Applicant is proposing to plant four trees due to utility easements and associated conflicts. A landscape plan is included as Attachment G. Section 1325.04, Subdivision 2, requires landscaping on lots used for drive-up windows to the minimum widths: Front Lot Line 20’ Side Lot Line 10’ Rear Lot Line 15’ The Applicant is requesting flexibility to these requirements. The drive-thru lane on the north side of the property will be located approximately 8’ from the north property line and 5’ from the east property line. F. Snow Storage Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant is proposing to store snow in the northwest corner of the proposed site and has indicated that in scenarios of excessive snowfall that snow will be hauled away from the site. During the concept plan discussion, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. The Applicant had indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. G. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Requested The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right- of-way of any public street. Flexibility has been requested for the parking spaces on the south side of the development along Grey Fox Road. The Applicant is proposing a 5 foot setback from the ROW. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Meets Requirements Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. The following provisions would apply based on the proposed uses: • Retail Sales - one (1) parking space for each 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area. • Business & Professional Offices - one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. • Clinics – one (1) for each doctor or dentist plus one (1) for each nurse, technician, or professional and one (1) for each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. • Other Business and Industry – one (1) space for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. The proposed plan would consist of a one-story 19,480 square foot grocery store, and a multi- tenant building with a 2,500 square foot bank and 2,800 square foot dental clinic. The Applicant ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 17 is proposing 143 parking spaces total for the development. The following table breaks down the off-street parking requirements based on the proposed uses. Based on the site information provided, the development would be required to establish 120 parking spaces. Access to the parking lot will be provided via a two-way entrance off Grey Fox Road. Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Grocery Store - 1 space per 150 SF of retail gross floor area 12,838 86 94 (sum of 86+5+3) Grocery Store – 1 space per 1,000 SF of back room/cooler 4,590 5 Grocery Store – 1 space per 250 SF of office 670 3 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,500 10 10 Dental Office – 1 space per dentist & technician, and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 2,800 16* 39 The Applicant has shown a smaller building square footage for the grocery store to be reflective of retail area only on the Site Data Plan Sheet C-010. Included in the submission was an Operations Plan which shows a variety of uses within the grocery store (i.e. retail, office, and storage). Each use is subject to minimum parking requirements in the Zoning Code and is reflected in the table above. *The Applicant has noted in their site data that two (2) off-street parking spaces are being allocated in their parking counts towards staffing requirements for the dental clinic. That minimum number may need to be increased based on actual tenant staffing. I. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, P states new building construction shall include construction of a minimum of six (6) foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all right-of-way. There are currently no sidewalks along Lexington Avenue or Grey Fox Road. The applicant is proposing a five (5) foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. The applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue but notes that one is planned as part of the future Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. The Applicant is proposing a bicycle rack on the east side of the Aldi building. The proposed bike rack conforms to zoning requirements in Section 1325.05 Subd, 8, Q. J. Freestanding Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. The Applicant is proposing s shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site. On-premise signage is defined as “A sign whose message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On- ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 17 premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties.” The Applicant would like to utilize this requirement as part of the Master Planned Unit Development approval. The proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16 feet in height and has a total sign copy area of 110 square feet allocated between the three tenants as illustrated in Attachment F. K. Wall Signs – Meets Requirements Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed wall signs up to 80 square feet. The Applicant has shown one 75 square foot wall sign on the south (facing Grey Fox Road) and east (facing Lexington Avenue) of the building. Then the outparcel multi-tenant building will feature a wall sign for each tenant of 33 square feet located above their main entrances of the building on the west elevation (facing interior of site), a 14 square foot sign each on the east elevation (facing Lexington Avenue), and then one 33 square foot sign on their respective spaces on the north/south elevation. All signage is noted to be internally lit. The signage plans are shown in Attachment F. L. Drive-Thru Facilities – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.04 of the Zoning Code lists special requirements for drive-up facilities. One of these requirements states no drive up facility shall be located within 1,320’ of another facility. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly north of the Subject Property. Section 1320.09 allows this requirement to be waived if the following conditions are met: Sign materials are noted to be consistent with building materials and will consist of brick and metal panels. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 17 A. The operation consists of one or more drive-up windows and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows. B. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such businesses using drive-up windows in said building or complex. C. Only one building or architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows will be allowed in addition to one freestanding business using a drive-up window. D. The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the appearance and function of the complex or building. E. An architecturally unified complex may consist of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent of providing a unified appearance and function is not compromised. F. The applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the use will not interfere or reduce the safety of non-motorized movements, specifically pedestrian and bicyclists. During the concept review, the Applicant was originally proposing a coffee shop/food and beverage tenant for the northern endcap of the outparcel building. That triggered discussion on possible traffic congestion, shared parking, and sufficient space for drive-thru stacking. The tenant occupancy has changed as part of this review and the north unit will now be occupied by a bank. The Applicant has stated that the change in tenant will eliminate the concerns previously expressed. The proposal still includes a drive-up window for the bank on the north side of the building. The Applicant is not proposing any electronic devices (i.e. loud speakers or menu board) as part of this application. Customers accessing the bank drive-thru facility will go directly to the teller/bank window for transactions. The applicant is requesting flexibility from this requirement to allow the drive-thru component. 2. Traffic Study and Site Circulation No new access is proposed as part of this review. The Applicant intends to utilize two of the existing accesses and remove two. Access 1 is a two-way entrance that will be located on Grey Fox Road in the same place as the existing. Access 2 is also existing and leads onto the alley on the western boundary of the site. It is anticipated that vehicles will primarily use Access 1 to access the site. The accesses located approx. 60 feet 400 feet west of Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road will be removed. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment I for summary section of report). The study reviewed existing operations within the area, evaluated traffic impacts to the roadway network, and recommended improvements to the proposed development site. It should be noted that this study was completed analyzing the trip generation between a grocery store, bank, and fast food restaurant with drive-thru facility. With the tenant change, the Applicant is not proposing to install the side street stop control at the site access due to the lessened site intensity between the bank and dental clinic uses which they’ve noted should prevent congestion in the parking areas. During the concept review, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the site for access to the loading dock on the north side of the proposed Aldi building. The Applicant has provided as part of their submission plans illustrating vehicle movements and pedestrian routes. Those documents are included in the site plan exhibits. These plans are being reviewed by the Fire Marshal to ensure adequate spacing has been provided. The City Engineer is also evaluating turning radius and may provide additional comment on site functionality. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 17 3. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Building Height 35 feet +/- 29 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 15.0% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Bank/Dental: 21.4 feet Aldi: 30 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 feet (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 feet (east) and 10 feet (west) Building Positioning At Front Setback = 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Parking Requirements 120 total stalls 143 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 5 feet Building Façade 50% transparency at front <50%, Varies between building Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Seeking Flexibility to allow overall building design versus calculating per elevation. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk None along Lexington Avenue – Defers to project 5 foot – Grey Fox Road Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 110 square feet Wall Signage Sign District 5 Complies with Sign District 5 Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 14 of 17 Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment J) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Fire Marshal The plans are currently being reviewed by the Fire Marshal. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master Plan Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, setbacks, building positioning, building façade, building materials, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Master Planned Unit Development request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. • Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 15 of 17 the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the September 1, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of- way. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 16 of 17 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. The sign copy area for the freestanding monument signs shall be allowed up to 110 square feet as requested under the approved plans. All other signage shall comply with Sign District 5 regulations. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master PUD Development Agreement. 23. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. • Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. • Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. • Table: Motion to table of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 19, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 18, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review ____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 17 of 17 period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Final Plat E. Site Plans F. Building Elevations and Signage G. Landscape Plan H. Photometric Plan I. Traffic Study J. Engineering Comment Letter Attachment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ttachment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ttachment D 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DATA.DWGInc.SITE DATAC-010JMFJMFRJAC-010 SITE DATA ---- ---- C-0101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICEPROJECT LOCATIONNSWELOCATION MAP0SCALE IN FEETSITE SUMMARYPROPOSED ZONING:EXISTING ZONING:SITE/LOT AREA:IMPERVIOUS AREA:GREENSPACEPROVIDED:PARKING REQUIREMENTSTOTAL: 112143PUD SETBACKSPROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION:3737 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.1133 GREY FOX ROADARDEN HILLS, MN 55126S27 / T30 / R23RAMSEY COUNTY1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUTARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS),DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONSISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ANDCOMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK.3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OFDETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR INCHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGNINTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TOMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEENMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TOAVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FORGENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THEKNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACEUTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION(1-800-252-1166).PROJECT GENERAL NOTESALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS PROJECTS SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY OFARDEN HILLS REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION,2018 EDITION, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN ANDWATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, ANDCURRENT VERSION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE UNLESS DIRECTEDOTHERWISE.HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUMOF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE RAMSEY COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988 (NAVD 88).RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATESFOR THIS PROJECT.THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN MAY 2021 BYKIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES.SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCEPROJECT DATUMTOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGEND EXISTINGWWETXXXXUT><IIIOEUEUTVGFBOPROPOSED>IIOEUEUTVG>>>>>>>>OHLUTLCIVIL SHEET INDEXLIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.OWNER TO PROVIDE 10 TRIPS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FOR STAKING PURPOSES.STAKING SHALL INCLUDE ANY COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING: GRIDLINES WITHOFFSETS, ROUGH GRADE STAKING, UTILITIES, CURB & GUTTER, LIGHT POLES, SIGNS,SIDEWALK. ANY ADDITIONAL SURVEY WORK NEEDED OR REQUIRED SHALL BE THECONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO EMPLOY AND PAY ISG, INC. CONTACT RYANANDERSON WITH ISG, INC. AT (952) 426-0699 FOR PRICING INFORMATION.CONSTRUCTION STAKINGCIVIL PLAN ABBREVIATIONS: $WWDFKPHQW( N.T.S.11TRENCH WIDTHPIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTHNOTES:REINFORCED CONCRETESTORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDINGNTS11TRENCH WIDTHPIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTHNOTES:NON-CONCRETESTORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDINGNTSRIM ELEVATION324NOTES:123414020MANHOLE OR CATCH BASINNTS'T'AAPLAN OF COVERTOP BARS NOT SHOWNSECTION A-ANOTES:4020 MANHOLE OR CATCHBASIN CONCRETE COVERNTSN.T.S.20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-020JMFJMFRJAC-020 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. TYPICALHYDRANT INSTALLATIONNTSNOTES:TYPICALGATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATIONNTSARDEN HILLSNOTE:PIPE BEDDINGWATER MAINNTSNOTES:PIPE BEDDINGSANITARY SEWERNTSHEAVY-DUTYSANITARY CLEANOUTNTSHEAVY DUTYSUBDRAIN CLEANOUTNTSAABBCATCH BASIN BLEEDER DRAINNTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-021JMFJMFRJAC-021 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0211133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.CONCRETE SIDEWALKNTSST160BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNTSSTANDARDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNTSHEAVY DUTY20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-022JMFJMFRJAC-022 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0221133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.REVERSE PITCHCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERNTS2NOTES:121CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERNTSB61820-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-023JMFJMFRJAC-023 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0231133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.9"9"#6 - 14" LONG REBAREACH WAY THROUGHPIPEPIPE BOLLARD USE 6"SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPEWITH TOP ROUNDED FILLEDW/ CONCRETE ANDPAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOWSLOPE TOP OFCONCRETE3'-8"SEE SIGN SCHEDULE FOR MOUNTING HEIGHT3'-0"4000 P.S.I. P.C.CONCRETE3"0" (N.T.S.)GROUND/PAVINGSURFACEPROVIDE SIGNAGEAS NOTED ONPLANS/SCHEDULEN.T.S.N.T.S.POLE MOUNTED RESERVED CURBSIDEPARKING SIGNS. SEE PLAN FORLOCATION AND TYPE (TYP)EX. PARKINGSTALL WIDTH (TYP)ENTIRE PARKINGSPACES TO BEPAINTED "ALDI BLUE"WITH WHITENUMBERS ANDLETTERS1234CURBSIDECURBSIDECURBSIDE CURBSIDEALDI BLUE CUSTOM COLOR:CCE COLORANT OZ 32 64 128 L1-BLUE - 63 1 1 R3-MAGENTA - 5 - 1 Y3-DEEP GOLD - 1 1 --ARIAL BOLD FONT SHALL BE USED FOR NUMBERS AND LETTERS-PAINT SHALL BE SEALMASTERS 'COLOR PAVE' OR 'LIQUID THERMOPLASTIC'TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT OR AS APPROVED BY ALDI CM. CONTACT ROCHESTERJET-BLACK, GARY ROSBROOK, 585-441-4125 FOR ORDERING.-a. COLOR PAVE SHALL BE USED FOR NEW PAVEMENT-b. LIQUID THERMOPLASTIC SHALL BE USED FOR OLDER PAVEMENT THAT HASBEEN SEALED WITH A COAL TAR SEALER.-SURFACE PREPARATION SHALL COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS.-SIGNS, NUMBERS AND WORDING TO BE PLACED CENTEREDPARKING SPACEAND SIGN NUMBERTO MATCH (TYP)60"NUMBERS(TYP)12"LETTERS(TYP)RESTRIPE PARKINGSPACE TO MATCHEXISTING COLORN.T.S.PARKING SURFACEACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNNTSACCESSIBLE PARKING AREANTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-024JMFJMFRJAC-024 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0241133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>II>>>>PCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PCPCPCPCPCPCPCPC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C1-SWPPP.DWGInc.SITE EROSIONCONTROL PLANC-110JMFJMFRJAC-110 SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN ---- ---- C-1101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIESDESCRIPTION UNITSQUANTITYEROSION CONTROL LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONPC101100 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C1-SWPPP NARRATIVE.DWGInc.SWPPP NOTESC-120JMFJMFRJAC-120 SWPPP NOTES ---- ---- C-1201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.20-23946V7.0 ERDrawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Drawing Name:Designed By:Reviewed By:SWPPP NOTESC-120JMFJMFRJAC-120SWPPP NOTES RUNOFF FLOWDIRECTION OFSILT FENCENTSNOTES:CONCRETE WASHOUTNTSNOTES:CURB BOX FILTERINLET PROTECTIONNTSNOTES:ROUND FILTERINLET PROTECTIONNTS6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1"TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK ORSLASH MULCHMnDOT STANDARDSPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE VPERMEABLE GEOTEXTILEFABRIC BENEATH ROCK ORSLASH MULCH18" HIGH (MIN) CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZERUNOFF FROM LEAVING SITE EXTEND SILTFENCE FROM EITHER SIDE OF BERM AS NEEDEDSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITNTSNOTES:SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG STAKINGNTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SWPPP DETAILSC-130JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-130 SWPPP DETAILS ---- ---- C-1301133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEXXXXXXXXXXXX OEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOOEOEOEOE60' ROW >>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 > > >>>GGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C2-EXIST.DWGInc.EXISTING SITE ANDREMOVALS PLANC-210JMFJMFRJAC-210 EXISTING SITE AND REMOVALS PLAN ---- ---- C-2101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.REMOVAL LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-SITE.DWGInc.SITE PLANC-310LFORJARJAC-310 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C-3101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G OEOE OEOEOEOEE>>>>OEOEOEOOOOOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE>>>>>>OEOEOEOE>>>>>>>25.0025.00 FBOFBOFBBBBOBFBBBBOB>>>>>>FBOFBOOOEEEEOEOOEEEEOEALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7UEUEUEUEUEUEUE IIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366FBOFBOFFBOFFBOFFFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOBFBOBFBOBFBOBFBOOOFBOFBOFBOFFBFBFBOFFBBBOFFII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-UTILITY.DWGInc.SITE UTILITY PLANC-320LFOLFORJAC-320 SITE UTILITY PLAN ---- ---- C-3201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.UTILITY LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED>>>>>><IIII>IIGGOEOEUEUEUTUTUTVOHLUTLFBO STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE SCHEDULESTORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULESANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-UTILITY.DWGInc.UTILITY SCHEDULESC-321JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-321 UTILITY SCHEDULES ---- ---- C-3211133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G OE OEOE>OEOEOOOOEOEOEOE>>OEOE>>25.00 FBOFBBBOBB>FBOOOOOEEEEEOOOEEEOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FFBOFBOFFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBFBFBOFBFFII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C4-SITE GRADING PLAN.DWGInc.SITE GRADING PLANC-410LFORJA/LFO/JMFRJAC-410 SITE GRADING PLAN ---- ---- C-4101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.GRADING LEGENDGENERAL GRADING NOTES101100 X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.00FBOFBBBBOFBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'1820143023FFBOFBOFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBFBFBOFBX OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.00X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.00FBOFBBBOBFBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'1820143023FFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOBFBOFBOFBFBFBOFBX OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.00VEHICLE MOVEMENTS (IN)ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ISGInc.comCAD FILE NAMEInc.Arden Hills, MinnesotaALDI STORE #30ISG Project No. 20-23946August 9, 2021N1 OF 0REFERENCE SCALE1 INCH = FEET10 20 4020VEHICLE MOVEMENTS (OUT) X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 FBOFBBOOBFBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7181762014302366FFFBOFBOFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBFBFBOBOFBOFBFBBOFBOX OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 PEDESTRIAN ROUTESARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ISGInc.comCAD FILE NAMEInc.Arden Hills, MinnesotaALDI STORE #30ISG Project No. 20-23946August 9, 2021N1 OF 0REFERENCE SCALE1 INCH = FEET10 20 4020 19'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL22'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEELGRADE LINE - SEE CIVIL DWGS.A1A30618'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-4" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY11'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY EQEQ9'-6"SIGN OPNG.7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.GRADE LINE - SEE CIVIL DWGS.TYP.21'-2" A.F.F.CENTER OF LOGO SIGNSD1A301B1A305D1A305D1A304D1A30619'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOORGRADE LINE - SEECIVIL DWGS.A1A30511'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD14'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUDEQEQ0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL9'-6"SIGN OPNG.3'-4" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY19'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.GRADE LINE - SEECIVIL DWGS.TYP.D1A302B1A304B1A303C1A305FLASHING ATSILL BEYOND11'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY FINISH22'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEELD1A303@ BUILDINGWALL@ CARTWALLB1A30618'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUDSIGNAGEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITY SQ. FT. PER SIGNTOTALSTOWER SIGN274.9 149.8TOTAL SIGNAGE 149.8SIGNAGE IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATEPERMIT SUBMITTALEXTERIOR MATERIALS TABLEFACADE MATERIALPERCENTAGE OFFACADENORTHMASONRY 71%CLEAR GLAZING 1%SPANDREL GLAZING 3%FIBER CEMENT BOARD 24%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL1%SOUTHMASONRY30%CLEAR GLAZING11%FIBER CEMENT BOARD 45%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL14%EASTMASONRY40%CLEAR GLAZING20%SPANDREL GLAZING4%FIBER CEMENT BOARD13%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL23%WESTMASONRY65%SPANDREL GLAZING3%FIBER CEMENT BOARD25%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL7%Drawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Store #:20-0693AALDI Inc.Arden Hills, MNLexington Ave & Grey Fox RdArden Hills, MN Ramsey County10/28/20RHRDV7ERAs NotedXXIssued for Client Review 10/30/20Issued for Client Review 11/12/20Issued for Client Review 02/25/21Issued for Client Review 07/08/21Issued for Client Review 08/09/21Inc.PLOTTED: 8/9/2021 3:12 PMDate:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATEPROJECT LEADDATESeal SealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567893North ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4South ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1West ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"ExteriorElevationsCBCEE-3A2East ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Attachment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hdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϲϭϵϭ͘ϳϵWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϭϰϭϬ͘ϵϳ^dKZ&ZKEd ϭϭϭϴ͘ϳϱ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϭϬϴϬ͘ϴ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϭϬϳϴ͘ϴdKd>ϰϲϴϵ͘ϯϮWZEdK&dKd> ϳϲйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϯϬϮ͘ϲϱKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϭϴϮ͘Ϭϯ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϭϬϮϲ͘ϯϵdKd>ϭϱϭϭ͘ϬϳWZEdK&dKd> Ϯϰй7H[W6LJQDJH/RJR6LJQDJH7H[W6LJQDJH/RJR6LJQDJH127(5RRIWRSPHFKDQLFDOHTXLSPHQWWREHVFUHHQHGE\EXLOGLQJSDUDSHWVIURPYLHZ0HFKDQLFDO(TXLSPHQW6L]HDQG/RFDWLRQVDUHWREHGHWHUPLQHG2QFH(TXLSPHQWLVNQRZQDVLJKWOLQHVWXG\ZLOOEHSUHSDUHGWRYHULI\VFUHHQLQJUHTXLUHPHQWVDUHPHW5RRIWRS0HFKDQLFDO8QLW5RRIWRS0HFKDQLFDO8QLWKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳ^Khd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϯϬϴWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϭϵϵ^dKZ&ZKEdϮϰϬ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϲϰ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϰϰϲdKd>ϵϱϬWZEdK&dKd> ϳϯйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϱϴKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϰϳ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϮϱϯdKd>ϯϱϴWZEdK&dKd> ϮϳйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^ͲEKZd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZϭϮϵϰWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/<Ϯϭϭ^dKZ&ZKEdϯϬϴ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϯϵϱ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/<ϮϱϱdKd>ϭϭϲϴWZEdK&dKd>ϵϬйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϳϭKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϱϱ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϬdKd>ϭϮϲWZEdK&dKd>ϭϬй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hdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳt^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϴϯϯWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϰϮϳ^dKZ&ZKEdϱϳϳ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϯϮϮ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϬdKd>ϭϯϮϲWZEdK&dKd> ϳϮйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϰϴKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϯϬ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϰϰϰdKd>ϱϮϮWZEdK&dKd> ϮϴйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳ^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϳϱϴWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϱϳϰ^dKZ&ZKEdϬ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϮϳϮ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϯϳϳdKd>ϭϮϮϯWZEdK&dKd> ϳϬйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϭϮϳKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϱϵ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϯϯϵdKd>ϱϮϱWZEdK&dKd> ϯϬй 3DJH$UGHQ+LOOV'HYHORSPHQW*UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH16RXWK:HVW0XOWL7HQDQW%XLOGLQJ3HUVSHFWLYH1RUWK:HVW0XOWL7HQDQW%XLOGLQJ3HUVSHFWLYH)XOO'HYHORSPHQW3HUVSHFWLYH'DWH,VVXHG ALDI-Prototype Color PalletDarkMasonry:Metal Coping:Nichiha Panels:Aluminum Sill:Upper Wall Fallback Options:Spec-Brik: Chesapeake BlendQuik-Brik: Marous BlendBelden Brick: Modular Ebony Black BlendAt High Roof &Canopy: SilverAt Brick: Musket GrayAt Nichiha Towers:CedarAt EIFS: GraniteAt Ribbed Nichiha:GraniteAt Standing Seam:ZincBright SilverCedarExterior Cladding:CedarBase Flashing: CedarLocking Metal Panel System:Lead CoteNichiha Ribbed Panels:Mother of PearlExterior Insulated Finish System(EIFS): Dover SkyAluminum Composite Panel:Bright Silver615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564585.742.2222 - www.apd.com FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONFACTORY FINISH SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGSMOTOR GONG FACTORY FINISH SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGSHOSE BIB FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSRPZ DISCHARGE FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSGAS METER FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSGLAZING KEYRE: DWG A602ALIGN KEYA: ALIGN NICHIHA PANEL JOINTS AND WINDOW MULLIONSB: ALIGN ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL JOINTS AND WINDOW MULLIONSC: ALIGN NICHIHA PANEL JOINTS, ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL JOINTS, AND WINDOW MULLIONSPREFINISHED ALUM. SILL FLASHINGA3 - BRIGHT SILVERA3a - PETERSEN ALUM # "CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE"SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ANODIZED ALUM. RE: DWG. A602MEMBRANE ROOFING GRAYTOP OF SLOPED ROOF, CANOPY ROOF, AND BACK OF RAISED ROOF PROJECTIONS - SEE SPECIFICATIONSAPPENDIX 'B'METAL SOFFIT PANELSA6 - SOLID PANELS - BRIGHT SILVERA6a - 1/2 VENTED PANELS - BRIGHT SILVERRE: DWG. A301-A304EXTERIOR PAINTPT-19 / CL-9RE: DWG. A603ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ANODIZED ALUMINUM RE: DWG. A602ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL BRIGHT SILVERPROVIDE PANEL JOINTS AS SHOWN - PROVIDE ONE PIECE TIGHT FIT EXTRUDED MOLDING INSTALLATIONSYSTEM WITH CENTER REVEAL TRIM BETWEEN PANELS AND J TRIM AT PANEL EDGES.BLRD-2PT-19 / CL-4RE: DWG A603BLRD-4RE: DWG A603GUARD RAIL TYPE "A" GALVANIZED STEELRE: DWG B2/A507GUARD RAIL TYPE "B" GALVANIZED STEELRE: DWG B2/A507BLRD-3 GALVANIZED RE: DWG A603DOCK LEVELER / SEAL AND BUMPERSLEVELER - FACTORY FINISH / SEAL ANDBUMPERS - FACTORY FINISH - BLACKPROVIDE BRICK BEHIND DOCK SEALMASONRY CONTROL JOINTMAX 20' OCOVERFLOW SCUPPER MATCH COPING ABOVERE: DWG A2/A507ARCHITECTURAL CAST STONE TANNERSTONE: AG-1 SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - MORTAR COLOR TO MATCH CAST STONEALDI TOWER SIGN BY SIGN VENDOR7'-11 1/8" w. x 9'-5 1/2" h.; VERIFY SIGN SIZE PRIOR TO FRAMING OPENINGSEE DETAIL C1/A504CRTB NATURAL RE: DWG A603 - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGSBASE BID - BRICK 'A'SPEC-BRICK CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER4Wx8Hx16L (12W @ CART WALL ONLY)CHESAPEAKE BLEND w/ HOLCIM "SMITH GRAY"MORTARMORTAR ALT: SOLOMON "85X DARKCHOCOLATE"CONTACT THE CONCRETE PRODUCTS GROUP AT 800-789-0872 FOR ORDERINGSEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOALTERNATE No. 2 - BRICK 'B'QUIK-BRIK CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER4Wx8Hx16L (12W @ CART WALL ONLY)MAROUS BLEND w/ HOLCIM "SMITH GRAY"MORTARMORTAR ALT: SOLOMON "85X DARKCHOCOLATE"CONTACT ECHELON MASONRY AT 800-899-8455 FOR ORDERINGSEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOALTERNATE No. 3 - BRICK 'C'BELDEN BRICKMODULAR EBONY BLACK BLEND w/ HOLCIM"SMITH GRAY" MORTARMORTAR ALT: SOLOMON "85X DARKCHOCOLATE"CONTACT THE BELDEN BRICK COMPANY AT 330-451-2031 FOR ORDERINGSEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFONICHIHA FIBER CEMENT EXTERIOR CLADDING VINTAGEWOOD 'CEDAR'PANELS SHALL EXTEND ONTO THE ROOF FOR THE FULL DEPTH OF THE BUMPOUT. CONTACT NICHIHA AT770-805-9466 FOR ORDERING. SEE SPEC FOR TRIM REQUIREMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFO. ALL INCLUDEDTRIM ('H', 'J', 'L', CORNER, ETC) TO MATCH FCPEXIT DISCHARGE LIGHT FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 8'-0" A.F.F.WALL SCONCE FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 14'-8" A.F.F.; RE: DWG. A111 FOR DIMENSIONSJUNCTION BOX WITH COVER FOR FUTURE CARDREADERMOUNT CENTERED @ 46" A.F.F., SEE ELEC DWGSUTILITY METERING & C.T. FACTORY FINISH SEE ELECTRICAL DWGSEXTERIOR WALL PACK FACTORY FINISHMAN DOORS - MOUNT @ 9'-0" A.F.F., BREAK ROOM WINDOW @ 10'-0" A.F.F.ALL OTHER LOCATIONS - MOUNT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.EXTERIOR DUPLEX RECEPTACLE FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 1'-6" A.F.F. IN 4" SQUARE J-BOXROOFTOP UNIT SCREENING SYSTEM ENVISOR BY CITYSCAPES SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNOT USEDEXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEKEYMATERIAL / MFG. COLOR / NO.NOTESKNOX BOX FACTORY FINISH CONFIRM TYPE AND LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE MARSHALAUTO DOOR SYSTEM & TRANSOM ANODIZED ALUMINUM RE. DWG A601 & A602ALDI LOGO SIGN BY SIGN VENDORSURFACE MOUNTED SIGN: 15'-2 1/2" W. X 5'-1" H.8" X 8" PRE-FINISHED ALUM GUTTER MATCH PREFINISHED METAL COPING8" X 8" PRE-FINISHED ALUM DOWNSPOUT MATCH PREFINISHED METAL COPING TERMINATE AT CONC. SPLASH BLOCKACP H/J TRIM / JOINT COVERTYPICAL AT EDGES AND BUTT JOINTS OF ACPNICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL BASE FLASHINGPETERSEN ALUMINUM - #'CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE'SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOADDRESS IDENTIFICATIONADDRESS IDENTIFICATION CHARACTERS SHALLCONTRAST WITH THE BACKGROUNDEACH CHARACTER SHALL BE A MIN. OF 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MIN. STROKE WIDTH OF 1/2 INCHNICHIHA CONTROL JOINT WITH "H" CLIPEXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEKEYMATERIAL / MFG. COLOR / NO.NOTESPREFINISHED METAL COPINGA1- SILVER - AT HIGH ROOF & CANOPYA1a - PETERSEN ALUM - MUSKET GREY-AT BRICKA1b - PETERSEN ALUM - #'CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE' - AT NICHIHA TOWERSSEE SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 'B'NOT USEDNOT USEDDrawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Store #:20-0693AALDI Inc.Arden Hills, MNLexington Ave & Grey Fox RdArden Hills, MN Ramsey County10/28/20RHRDV7ERAs NotedXXIssued for Client Review 10/30/20Issued for Client Review 11/12/20Issued for Client Review 02/25/21Issued for Client Review 07/08/21Issued for Client Review 08/09/21Inc.PLOTTED: 8/9/2021 3:13 PMDate:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATEPROJECT LEADDATESeal SealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE23456789ExteriorElevationsCBCEE-3B ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366II(1) UP2(1) UP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE25.00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(2) RA(5) TB(5) TB(3) CK(2) TB(3) CK(3) JB(2) HJ(2) JB(3) TB(8) TB(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(5) CK(1) JB(2) UP(3) TB(7) HG(3) HJ(1) JB(2) ST(13) HG(11) CK(3) HJ(2) UP(2) RA(1) UP(1) UP2(1) UP(1) UP2(1) UP(1) TT(1) SI(1) SI(1) SI(1) GI(1) SI(2) RA(1) SI(1) GI(1) SI(1) GI(17) HJ(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(4) TB(14) HG(3) ST(3) CK(1) TT(4) TT(6) RA(6) RA20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.SITE RESTORATION &PLANTING PLANC-510JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-510 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C-5101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE SUMMARYDENTALDENTALDENTAL $WWDFKPHQW* 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.LANDSCAPE DETAILS& NOTESC-520JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-520 LANDSCAPE DETAILS & NOTES ---- ---- C-5201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.ROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0CONIFER / EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0GENERAL PLANTING NOTESROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLCONTAINER DIA2X CONTAINER DIALANDSCAPE EDGING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0SHRUB PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0IRRIGATION NOTES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OEALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7UTUTUTUTUT 1817620143023660.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.5 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.5 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.8 3.8 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.8 3.0 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.8 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 3.0 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.5 3.4 4.4 4.6 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.3 3.3 2.1 1.5 1.5 1.9 3.0 4.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.8 3.4 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.11.0 2.1 3.2 3.9 3.2 2.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.7 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.6 2.2 2.6 3.6 4.9 5.45.4 5.45.3 4.9 3.6 2.2 1.8 1.8 2.2 3.6 4.8 5.6 6.4 6.3 5.9 4.8 3.9 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.9 2.6 5.5 11.3 6.2 3.8 2.2 2.4 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.3 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.3 0.0 1.0 2.9 4.1 5.1 5.86.7 6.66.0 4.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.4 4.2 4.4 6.5 6.6 4.6 4.0 3.5 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.4 0.8 0.62.5 3.24.1 5.76.6 6.76.0 4.2 3.8 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.7 4.95.76.5 6.4 6.0 4.8 4.0 2.2 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.6 2.5 2.42.3 3.54.75.66.4 6.36.0 4.94.12.5 2.0 1.9 2.2 3.3 4.8 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.8 3.4 1.81.10.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.10.6 3.1 8.62.0 3.14.75.05.1 5.15.15.0 3.6 2.3 1.81.72.2 3.2 4.24.55.0 5.04.44.2 3.11.70.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.6 3.411.11.9 2.9 3.74.14.8 4.94.4 4.13.4 2.4 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.3 3.3 2.7 2.5 2.3 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.7 2.7 2.91.72.0 2.1 2.3 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.01.7 1.41.31.10.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.5 1.0 0.81.11.2 1.31.51.8 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.01.7 1.41.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.2 0.20.7 0.9 0.91.11.31.72.4 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.9 3.8 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.11.4 1.10.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.0 0.02.2 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.01.42.1 3.34.5 4.75.2 5.24.7 4.43.3 2.0 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.08.5 2.9 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.91.42.0 3.4 4.95.4 5.5 5.55.3 4.8 3.4 2.01.40.0 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.08.3 2.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.91.52.2 3.9 4.9 5.9 6.7 6.7 5.9 4.9 3.9 2.21.50.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.04.6 2.3 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.91.42.3 3.4 5.0 5.8 6.6 6.6 5.84.13.4 2.31.50.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.02.91.40.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 3.64.7 5.76.2 6.35.7 4.73.6 2.01.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.11.70.5 0.7 1.6 3.7 7.34.51.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.81.11.8 3.24.74.9 4.9 4.9 4.94.73.01.7 1.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.61.70.6 0.81.72.0 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.61.51.6 1.81.7 1.5 1.10.9 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.9 3.6 4.0 4.64.53.9 3.6 2.81.71.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.51.50.5 0.6 0.91.1 1.41.6 2.0 2.2 1.8 1.61.4 1.5 1.71.91.51.2 1.31.72.1 2.0 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.01.40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.31.71.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.71.1 1.4 1.5 1.51.8 1.8 1.91.5 1.41.61.41.2 1.2 1.2 1.21.4 1.5 1.51.31.1 1.10.9 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.91.11.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.01.11.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.81.71.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.35.320-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C6-LIGHT.DWGInc.SITE LIGHTPHOTOMETRICS PLANC-610JMF/LFOJMFRJAC-610 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN ---- ---- C-6101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.FOOTCANDLE LEGEND"L31" & "L34" LIGHT STYLE"L21" & "L21A" LIGHT STYLEN.T.S.1"L24" LIGHT STYLEMANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBERLIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULESTYLETYPELAMPS REMARKSProvide light fixtures as shown on Fixture Schedule. Substitutions shall have prior approval by the Project Engineer before bid date. Being listed as anacceptable Manufacturer in no way relieves the Contractors obligation to provide all equipment and features in accordance with these specifications.L21L21L21AL21AL21AL24L24L24L24L24L31L31L31L34L34L34 Attachment H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Launch Properties 800 Lasalle Avenue, Suite 1610 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 JULY 2021 Attachment I Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ July 7, 2021 Jacob Rojer, P.E. Date License No. 56767 3 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Roadways ................................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 4 Background Growth and Committed Traffic........................................................................................... 5 Pedestrians And Bicycles ...................................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................... 6 Site Accesses and Assignment ............................................................................................................. 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 7 Opening Year (2023) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................ 7 Opening Year (2023) Build Conditions .................................................................................................. 8 Design Year (2040) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................... 9 Design Year (2040) Build Conditions ................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 4 INTRODUCTION Launch Properties is proposing a 19,209-square foot supermarket, an 1,850-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,550-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The site is currently industrial and manufacturing land uses. The existing site is an approximately 56,000-square foot, industrial use building. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed project location. All exhibits are included in Appendix A. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed development is located on the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The following intersections will be included in the traffic capacity analysis: x Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road x Grey Fox Road and Site Access 1 (East) x Grey Fox Road and Site Access 2 (West) The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1. EXISTING ROADWAYS Access to the development will be on Grey Fox Road. Following provides a detailed description of the surrounding roadways. Lexington Avenue (CSAH 51) is currently a north-south five-lane undivided County State Aid Highway (CSAH) with two lanes in each direction and a two way left turn lane, however in spring of 2022 construction is planned to convert the roadway to a four-lane divided roadway, these geometric changes will be incorporated into the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) models. The MnDOT Functional Classification System Map classifies Lexington Avenue as a Minor Arterial Roadway. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports an annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 21,300 vehicles per day (vpd) in 2019 on Lexington Avenue. The posted speed limit on Lexington Avenue is 40 miles per hour (mph). Grey Fox Road is a two-lane east-west roadway with one lane in each direction. Grey Fox Road is classified as a Local Road according to the MnDOT Functional Classification System Map. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the AADT on Grey Fox Road as 3,450 vpd in 2017. The current posted speed limit on Grey Fox Road is 30 mph. Exhibit 2 provides the future intersection geometry and intersection control for the study intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze the traffic operations at the study intersection, weekday peak period turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, June 17, 2021. Exhibit 3 provides a summary of the weekday AM and PM peak hour turning traffic volumes. The turning movement count data is provided in Appendix B. The network AM peak hour was determined to be 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM and the network PM peak hour was determined to be 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM. 5 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 The 2021 turning movement counts were compared to historic AADT on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road and 2018 turning movement counts in the area to determine if there are still variations in traffic volumes due to COVID-19. Overall, the 2021 turning movement counts were greater than historic AADT and the peak hour volumes were similar to the 2018 turning movement counts so an adjustment factor was not applied to the turning movement counts. BACKGROUND GROWTH AND COMMITTED TRAFFIC Historical AADT data provided by MnDOT’s Interactive Traffic Mapping Application and the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study conducted by SRF in February 2021 were reviewed to develop a background growth rate to forecast peak hour volumes at the study intersections for Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040). Based on historic growth rates and prior traffic study, a 0.5% annual growth rate was applied to the Existing (2021) traffic volumes to develop the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) turning movement volumes. In addition to background growth, the trips generated by the Phase 3 of the Lexington Station Development were added to study intersections, these trips were assigned as documented in the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study for all analysis scenarios. With the reconstruction of Lexington Avenue, the access approximately 500 feet south of the Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road, that serves Cub Foods and the strip mall to the south will be converted to a ¾ access. This would result in the eastbound left turning traffic destined to the north at the access to reroute to the Grey Fox Road & Lexington Avenue signal. The redistributed exiting volumes were taken from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) Traffic Study completed in April 2019 by Alliant Engineering; these redistributed trips were included at the study area intersections for all analysis scenarios. Exhibit 4 shows the Opening Year No-Build (2023) turning movement volumes and Exhibit 5 shows the Horizon Year No-Build (2040) turning movement volumes. PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES There is an existing trail on the east side of Lexington Avenue, on the west side of Lexington Avenue there is a sidewalk south of Grey Fox Road. There are marked crosswalks and pedestrian push-buttons on all approaches of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road. There are no sidewalks adjacent to the site on Grey Fox Road. With the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project that is scheduled to be constructed in 2022, pedestrian facilities will be improved. Additionally, the sidewalk west of Lexington Avenue will be extended to the north to Red Fox Road, providing pedestrian facilities on both sides of Lexington Avenue. An east-west sidewalk is proposed running east-west along the southern boundary of the proposed site (i.e. on the north side of Grey Fox Road) that would provide a pedestrian facility along Grey Fox Road. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIP GENERATION The trip-generating potential of the proposed development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the anticipated total trips generated by the site. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 6 The average rate for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 850 (Supermarket), ITE LUC 911 (Walk-in Bank), and ITE LUC 934 (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through) were used to calculate the trip generation potential of the site. Table 1 provides a summary of the number of trips anticipated to be generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, including internal capture reduction. As shown, the site is anticipated to generate 236 new trips during the AM peak hour (128 entering, 108 exiting) and 262 new trips during the PM peak hour (135 entering, 127 exiting). Table 1 – Site Trip Generation For this analysis, it was assumed that all site trips will be vehicle trips. To be conservative, it was assumed that all site trips would be new trips and no mode split reductions for trips via transit, bike or walking were used. SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION The site trips were distributed to the adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following global trip distribution was assumed for the development: x 50% to/from the north on Lexington Avenue x 40% to/from the south on Lexington Avenue x 10% to/from the west on Grey Fox Road The trip distribution for the site-generated traffic is shown in Exhibit 6. SITE ACCESSES AND ASSIGNMENT The site will include two (2) accesses. Access 1 will be located on Grey Fox Road, approximately 260 feet west of Lexington Avenue, in the same space as the existing access, with two egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 2 will be onto the alley on the western boundary of the site which also provides access to Grey Fox Road, with one egress lane and one ingress lane. vehicles are anticipated to primarily use Access 1 to access the site. Additionally, two of the existing accesses are proposed to be removed. The accesses located approximately 60 feet and 400 feet west of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road are proposed to be removed. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix C. The site trips were assigned to the study intersections as shown in Exhibit 7. Land Use Description Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Supermarket (LUC 850) 19,209 S.F. 1,774 41 25 66 72 74 146 Walk-in Bank (LUC 911) 1,850 S.F. 208 20 18 38 20 20 40 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through (LUC 934) 3,550 S.F. 1,320 67 65 132 43 33 76 Total Site Generated Trips (With Internal Capture Reduction) 3,302 128 108 236 135 127 262 7 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. Existing signal timings used in the analysis were provided by Ramsey County. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 2. The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is also shown in Table 2. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. Table 2 – Level of Service Information Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Description A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized) Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized) Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized) Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing were evaluated for each scenario. Due to the scheduled reconstruction of Lexington Avenue in 2022, the existing conditions were not analyzed. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows: x Opening Year (2023) No-Build x Opening Year (2023) Build x Design Year (2040) No-Build x Design Year (2040) Build OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the opening year. The analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 8 The two site accesses were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control. The intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road used the geometry and intersection control from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) project. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 4. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 3. Table 3 – Opening Year (2023) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 41.6 D 33.2 C 6.4 A 6.3 A WB 42.0 D 38.6 D 6.6 A NB 6.0 A 3.3 A 0.8 A SB 5.8 A 3.1 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.9 A 0.7 A 0.1 A 6.3 A WB 1.0 A 0.5 A 0.5 A NB 4.3 A - - 2.9 A SB 5.5 A 6.3 A 2.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.4 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 6.2 A WB - - 0.2 A 0.1 A NB 4.7 A 6.2 A 2.4 A SB 3.1 A 4.0 A 2.6 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 38.2 D 26.6 C 8.9 A 10.6 B WB 35.4 D 35.0 C 7.5 A NB 13.3 B 8.4 A 1.5 A SB 14.0 B 6.9 A 1.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.1 A 1.4 A 0.1 A 6.8 A WB 1.3 A 0.5 A 0.4 A NB 5.7 A 5.6 A 5.6 A SB 2.3 A 6.8 A 3.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.8 A 0.5 A 0.3 A 5.8 A WB 2.4 A 0.3 A 0.2 A NB 4.4 A 5.8 A 3.0 A SB 3.6 A 5.7 A 2.8 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM peak hour and in the PM peak hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD CONDITIONS Opening Year (2023) Build conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of the site traffic to the study intersections. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site trips in Exhibit 7 to the Opening Year (2023) No-Build turning movement volumes in Exhibit 4. The Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 8. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 4. 9 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 Table 4 – Opening Year (2023) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 38.5 D 31.9 C 6.9 A 8.6 A WB 40.6 D 35.1 D 6.1 A NB 8.0 A 4.6 A 1.0 A SB 6.6 A 5.1 A 1.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.4 A 0.4 A 0.1 A 6.7 A WB 1.1 A 1.0 A 0.4 A NB 5.9 A 5.0 A 4.4 A SB 6.6 A 6.7 A 3.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.9 A 0.2 A 1.1 A 6.4 A WB 1.7 A 0.6 A 0.2 A NB 4.2 A 2.7 A 2.8 A SB 4.9 A 6.4 A 2.7 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 36.2 D 23.2 C 10.0 A 13.7 B WB 29.4 C 11.3 B 6.5 A NB 17.1 B 10.7 B 1.8 A SB 15.8 B 12.6 B 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.5 A 2.6 A 0.1 A 16.1 C WB 1.7 A 1.3 A 0.5 A NB 6.7 A 16.1 C 13.4 B SB 11.7 B 6.9 A 9.6 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.1 A 0.6 A 0.2 A 5.3 A WB 1.0 A 0.8 A 0.5 A NB 4.9 A 5.3 A 3.3 A SB 4.1 A 4.6 A 2.9 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS A in the AM Peak Hour and LOS C or better in the PM Peak Hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the design year. The two site accesses were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 5. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 5. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 10 Table 5 – Design Year (2040) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 43.2 D 26.5 C 4.6 A 6.9 A WB 45.0 D 40.1 D 6.5 A NB 7.6 A 3.7 A 0.7 A SB 6.1 A 3.4 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.5 A 0.2 A 0.0 A 5.5 A WB 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.4 A NB 5.5 A - - 3.0 A SB 2.1 A 4.1 A 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.7 A 0.1 A 0.0 A 5.4 A WB - - 0.2 A 0.1 A NB 3.9 A 5.4 A 2.2 A SB 3.7 A 3.9 A 3.4 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 37.8 D 27.2 C 10.4 B 10.7 B WB 35.6 D 28.0 C 7.7 A NB 14.8 B 8.6 A 1.5 A SB 15.2 B 7.4 A 1.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.8 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 14.5 B WB 1.7 A 0.7 A 0.2 A NB 5.0 A 14.5 B 6.5 A SB - - 5.9 A 4.0 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.8 A 0.5 A 0.4 A 6.0 A WB 3.3 A 0.4 A 0.2 A NB 4.2 A 5.7 A 3.0 A SB 3.9 A 6.0 A 2.9 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM & PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD CONDITIONS The Design Year (2040) Build traffic volumes were developed from the addition of the Design Year (2040) No-Build volumes in Exhibit 5 and the Site Trips in Exhibit 7. Exhibit 9 shows the Design Year (2040) Build turning movement volumes. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 6. 11 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 Table 6 – Design Year (2040) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 40.6 D 30.2 C 6.7 A 8.1 A WB 37.1 D 29.0 C 6.8 A NB 7.8 A 4.7 A 1.0 A SB 6.8 A 5.0 A 1.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.7 A 0.4 A 0.2 A 6.9 A WB 1.1 A 1.0 A 0.4 A NB 4.7 A 6.4 A 4.1 A SB 6.9 A 4.4 A 3.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.3 A 0.3 A 0.1 A 6.1 A WB - - 0.6 A 0.3 A NB 4.0 A 6.1 A 2.0 A SB 4.3 A 3.4 A 2.8 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 35.4 D 25.3 C 11.1 B 13.9 B WB 32.7 C 22.5 C 7.1 A NB 17.0 B 11.6 B 2.3 A SB 16.0 B 12.8 B 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.6 A 2.6 A 0.7 A 14.6 B WB 1.6 A 1.4 A 0.5 A NB 7.4 A 14.6 B 13.7 B SB 14.5 B 8.9 A 7.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.0 A 0.7 A 0.4 A 5.9 A WB 1.4 A 0.9 A 1.1 A NB 4.3 A 3.8 A 3.2 A SB 5.0 A 5.9 A 2.9 A Based on the Design Year (2040) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM and PM peak hours. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D . All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Launch Properties is proposing a 19,209-square foot supermarket, an 1,850-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,550-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The site is anticipated to generate 236 new trips during the AM peak hour (128 entering, 108 exiting) and 262 new trips during the PM peak hour (135 entering, 127 exiting). Site access is proposed to include two (2) full accesses, one of the proposed accesses will all be located on Grey Fox Road 260 feet west of Lexington Avenue and the other will be located on Grey Fox Road at the alley that runs along the western boundary of the site. A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build, Opening Year (2023) Build, Design Year (2040) No-Build, and Design Year (2040) Build. In all four scenarios, the three study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. It is recommended to install side street stop control at the site access. No other geometric changes are required as a result of the development. APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 A. Exhibits NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 1PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREAARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationStudy IntersectionsProposed Site Driveways/Study Intersections NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 2FUTURE GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROLARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProject Site LocationStudy IntersectionsExisting Signal ControlExisting Stop Control NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 3EXISTING (2021) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 4OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 5DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 6SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTIONARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationSite Traffic DistributionInbound Site TrafficOutbound Site Traffic NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 7PROJECT TRAFFICARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 8OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 9DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD PEAK HOUR VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) Z 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 ZHRGREEN.COM September 1, 2021 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Aldi Store #30 - Engineering Plan Review Comments Dear David, An engineering plan review has been performed on the Aldi plan set, dated July 16, 2021. A summary of the review comments follows: PLAN SHEETS C-010 – SITE DATA 1. Final plans need to be signed and dated C-022 – SITE DETAILS 2. HD Bit Pavement Detail a. The pavement section is the same as standard pavement section. Update detail to Heavy Duty section. 3. Loading Dock Pavement Section a. Identify the slope/grade of the compacted surface to the subdrain. C- 110 – SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4. Provide detail for perimeter control 5. Missing inlet protection on structure just north of construction entrance C - 130 – SWPPP DETAILS 6. Clarify max spacing note in silt fence detail C - 310 – SITE PLAN 7. Detail western driveway pavement connection 8. What is the sidewalk tying into? Show/add note at both the west and east sidewalk ends. 9. Provide ADA notes and details at driveway, crosswalk and disabled parking locations. 10. Proposed lot line is shown. Are shared access easements/agreements in place between the parcels? 11. Is fence constructable in location shown without encroaching on adjacent property? Attachment J David Swearingen September 1, 2021 2 C-320 – SITE UTILITY PLAN 12. Detail existing sanitary MH connection 13. Provide high and low point locations and site flow line arrows 14. Need additional information and details on the plans for the underground storm system 15. Light poles locations are shown within the storm drainage system. a. Pole bases appear to be in conflict with system – detail C-410 – SITE GRADING PLAN 16. Cannot read elevations on east end (as noted) Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Aldi plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director Page 1 of 5 PC Agenda Item – 3C MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-021 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Jill and Greg Casmey Property Location: 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue Request: Minor Subdivision Requested Action Jill and Greg Casmey (“The Applicants”) are requesting the approval of a Minor Subdivision of their property located at 3300 New Brighton Road (“Subject Property A”) and their neighbor’s property located at 1893 Beckman Avenue (“Subject Property B”). Both subject properties are zoned R-2 – Single & Two Family Residential District and are guided as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. Background 1. Overview of Request The Minor Subdivision has been requested to allow for the alternation of the property line between the subject properties. Currently, the two properties have joint access to a driveway that crosses the shared property line. The Applicants are requesting the Minor Subdivision to alter the property line to include all of the shared driveway. This would involve adding 1,800 square feet of property to Subject Property A, owned by the Applicants. Application Review 1. 1150.04 Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record. In the case of an application to divide one or more lots platted into lots and blocks and designated in a subdivision plat on file and of record in the office of the recorder or registrar of titles for the county, into one or more separately described parcels, or an application for the consolidation of two or more such platted lots or parts thereof into one or more tracts, the City Page 2 of 5 Council, upon review and after report of the planning commission, may approve the subdivision or consolidation, upon compliance with the following conditions: Subd. 1 Survey. The owner(s) of the platted lot(s) to be so divided or consolidated shall file with the zoning administrator a survey or registered land survey of the lot(s) to be divided or consolidated. The survey or registered land survey shall be prepared and certified by a Licensed Surveyor. Criteria met. Subd. 2 Relation to Zoning Ordinance. The parcels or tracts resulting from the division or consolidation, as depicted in the survey or registered land survey, shall not have an area, dimensions or setbacks which are less than the minimum requirements specified for the zoning district in which the parcels or tracts are located in the zoning ordinance. Criteria met. Subd. 3 Public Welfare. It is determined that the proposed division or consolidation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent tracts in the area in which the subdivision tract is located. Criteria met. Subd. 4 Conformity. The proposed division or consolidation shall conform to such other requirements of this chapter, which the planning commission has specifically made such division or consolidation subject to at its first meeting at which the application for the division or consolidation is submitted. The City Council may add to or subtract from the requirements specified by the planning commission additional requirements of this chapter which it deems necessary for the protection of the health, safety, general welfare and convenience of the City and to secure the objectives of this chapter. Prior to the City Council's granting the owner(s) an exemption pursuant to this paragraph, the owner(s) shall comply with all the requirements of this chapter which the planning commission or City Council have specifically made the division or consolidation subject. Criteria met. Subd. 5 Such filing fee as has been established in a resolution adopted by the Council shall be paid the zoning administrator with every application for an exemption under this paragraph. Criteria met. 2. Zoning Code Review Lot Size and Dimensions The minimum lot area in the R-2 District is 11,000 square feet. The minimum lot width is 85 feet and the minimum depth is 120 feet. Subject Property A is 24,727 square feet or 0.57 acres. Subject Property B is 33,498 square feet or 0.77 acres. If the requested minor subdivision is approved, Subject Property A would be 26,527 square feet or 0.61 acres, and Subject Property B would be 31,689 square feet or 0.73 acres. Both parcels would comply with the minimum lot area, width, and depth in the R-2 District. Structure Setbacks with Adjusted Lot Lines No structural changes are proposed for the existing development on Property A or B. The minimum principal structure setbacks in the R-2 District are 40 feet in the front yard, 30 feet in Page 3 of 5 the rear yard (Principal), a 5-foot minimum in the side yard with both side yards required to add up to a total of 15 feet (Principal), and 10 feet in the rear and side yard (Accessory). The existing accessory structure on Property B is a legal nonconforming structure because it encroaches into the 10-foot rear yard setback requirement. The proposed lot line adjustment does not impact setback requirements from the existing development or create a nonconformity on either parcel. Based on the survey provided, all applicable setbacks will be met as a result of the proposed lot line adjustment between Property A and B. Lot Coverage The maximum structure coverage permitted in the R-2 District is 25 percent of the lot area. The minimum landscape lot area is 65 percent. Both Subject Properties would meet the structure and landscape coverage requirements with the proposed subdivision. Driveway and Residential Access Each property in the subdivision is entitled to exactly one access to a public street. The permitted width of accesses to streets is subject to County or State regulations, depending on whether the connecting street is maintained by the city, county, or state. According to City Code Section 1325.06, Subd. 3 the minimum width of a driveway access into Shoreline Lane is ten (10) feet; the maximum width permitted is twenty-two (22) feet wide. A driveway access may be placed adjacent to property lines, but it cannot be placed closer than five (5) feet to an existing driveway on an abutting parcel, and no driveway access can be placed closer than five (5) feet to any other principal building. As noted above, the two properties have joint access to a driveway that crosses the shared property line along New Brighton Road. The Applicants are requesting the Minor Subdivision to alter the property line to include all of the driveway access along New Brighton Road as part of Property A. Property B will continue to utilize the existing driveway access off of Beckman Avenue to their residence and will discontinue use of the access off of New Brighton Road. The Applicants had indicated that the Owner of Property B would be removing a section of the driveway to permanently discontinue use of the New Brighton Road access. This was not reflected in the application materials or shown on the site survey. The Planning Commission as part of the review should confirm with the Applicants of this intent and consider including as a condition of approval. The proposed lot line adjustment will bring the properties into compliance with code requirements. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1. The properties at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue are located in the R-2 – Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates the properties at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue as Low Density Residential. Page 4 of 5 3. The Applicants have submitted an application for a Minor Subdivision to adjust the side yard lot line between the two existing properties. 4. The proposed Minor Subdivision is not creating a new lot of record. 5. The request proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a single-family dwelling. 6. The Owner of the platted lot has filed with the zoning administrator a registered land survey of the lot line adjustment. 7. The proposed division will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent tracts in the area in which the subdivision tract is located. Proposed Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 021 for a Minor Subdivision at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: 1) The Applicant shall record the Minor Subdivision with Ramsey County and a copy shall be provided to the City within sixty (60) days of the City’s approval. 2) The Applicant shall record the drainage and utility easements as shown on the submitted survey with Ramsey County and a copy shall be provided to the City within sixty (60) days of the City’s approval. 3) Monument stakes shall be installed to demarcate the property lines adjusted between Property A and Property B. 2. Recommend Approval without Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-021 for a Minor Subdivision at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-021 for a Minor Subdivision at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-021 for a Minor Subdivision at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue for the following reasons: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice and Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Page 5 of 5 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 16, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 15, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Location Map B. Land Use Application C. Certificate of Survey /RFDWLRQ0DS 7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW 3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\ 7D[3DUFHOV &LWLHV &RXQW\2IILFHV $0    PL    NP  5DPVH\&RXQW\ 5DPVH\&RXQW\01 Attachment A $WWDFKPHQW% Attachment C Page 1 of 6 PC Agenda Item – 3D MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-020 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Bethel University Property Location: Outlot A and 2 Pine Tree Drive Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment Requested Action Bethel University (“The Applicant”) is requesting a Planned Unit Development Amendment for a proposed project located on Outlot A (“Subject Property”) within the 2 Pine Tree North Plat for a multi-tenant freestanding sign. The subject property falls within Sign District 7. With the recent subdivision of land, the Applicant no longer owns the parcel of land where their existing multi-tenant sign is located. The existing sign exceeds the height and sign area as allowed in this sign district. With the construction of a new sign, the Applicant is subject to compliance with the applicable sign district regulations. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to Sign District 4. Background 1. Overview of Request In 2013, Bethel University acquired the Country Financial facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive. The subject property is located within the B-2 General Business District, where higher educational uses are permitted by Conditional Use Permit (CUP). At its November 25, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a CUP for Bethel University to use the existing facility as higher education. The campus is referenced as their “Anderson Center” location. The approx. 227,000 square foot multi-tenant building is a mixture of higher education and office/commercial uses. The property was subdivided in 2020 and split into three lots and an outlot to be used for utilities and access drive within the plat. Bethel University retained their parcel with existing development and Outlot A. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in January 2021 for New Perspective Senior Living to be developed on Lot 1. Lot 2 was sold to the Lake Johanna Fire Department and is currently undeveloped. Bethel University has an existing multi- tenant freestanding sign that is located along Pine Tree Drive on Lot 2. They are planning to move the multi-tenant freestanding sign to Outlot A which is owned by Bethel University. With this relocation, the Applicant is planning upgrades to the freestanding sign design and size. Page 2 of 6 2. Site Data Future Land Use Plan: Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Institutional and Commercial Zoning: B-2, General Business District Size: 65.12 Acres (2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A) Plan Evaluation Chapter 12, Sign Code The Applicant is proposing a freestanding sign that will include tenant signage for those multiple uses located at 2 Pine Tree Drive, Anderson Center and New Perspective Senior Living at 3565 Pine Tree Drive. Within the sign code an “on-premise sign” is defined as a sign who message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On-premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties. Bethel University and New Perspective Senior Living have a shared parking agreement that was a condition of the PUD approval for New Perspective Senior Living. The shared parking agreement was reviewed by the City Council as part of the fully executed Development Agreement. With relocation of the sign, the Applicant is required to construct the new sign in compliance with sign standards as described under the ordinance. The Applicant is seeking flexibility on sign standards for height and sign copy area based on the size of the existing multi-tenant freestanding sign. A. Sign District – Seeks Flexibility The property falls within Sign District 7 which is described as follows: x All properties in the I-Flex, Gateway Business, or other commercial or industrial district without frontage on a roadway designated above. The Applicant is seeking flexibility under the PUD to allow sign standards as permitted under Sign District 4 which is described as follows: Page 3 of 6 x All properties fronting on County Road E east of Highway 51 except for those properties with frontage on Lexington Avenue. The following tables illustrates the sign standards as allowed by District: Type Max. Height Total Sign Copy Area Lighting Sign District 4 M/O 10 feet 50 square feet E/I/B Sign District 7 M/P/O 8 feet 25 square feet E The proposed sign would be located on Outlot A setback five feet from the property line along Pine Tree Drive. The monument sign will feature a solid brick base with the columns wrapped in brick to match the Anderson Center building. The sign panels will feature identification for tenants of the Anderson Center building and New Perspective Senior Living. The sign area shall be allocated by the Property Owner, Bethel University, consistent with Section 1250.01, Subd 2 – Allocation of Permanent Signs on Multi-Tenant Developments and Sites. The following table identifies existing and proposed sign standards to be considered for this application: Section 1240.02, Subd. 2, C. requires freestanding signs in Sign Districts 4 and 5 shall be monument type ground signs with the copy resting on and supported by a solid base of brick or rock-faced block in a color similar to or complimentary to the main structure on the site. The material of the base must extend at least one-half way up the sides of the sign face. The Applicant has complied with this requirement in the sign design as proposed. The PUD approval for New Perspective Senior Living includes a condition that “All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4.” The Applicant is seeking flexibility in the designated Sign District for their site to be consistent with the PUD approval for New Perspective Senior Living. Existing Sign Proposed Sign Type Pole Monument Height 13 feet 10 inches 10 feet Sign Copy Area 48 square feet 48 square feet Lighting Internal Internal Rendering Proposed Sign: Page 4 of 6 As shown on the proposed rendering, New Perspective Senior Living will be featured on the multi-tenant freestanding sign. This is consistent with the ordinance language for “on-premise signage”. The Applicant has indicated in their narrative that this sign does not replace the single- tenant monument sign that New Perspective Senior Living was approved on Outlot A (shown below). However, Staff has been told by New Perspective Senior Living as part of their building permit application that they do not intend to install a monument sign on Outlot A and will utilize a portion of the proposed multi-tenant sign. The approved New Perspective Senior Living sign and the proposed multi-tenant sign are shown in generally the same location on Outlot A. Outlot A is 60 feet wide along Pine Tree Drive. This should be confirmed by the Applicant as part of the Planning Commission review as to whether or not there will be two freestanding signs on Outlot A. Application Review 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Under Section 1355.06 subd.4, an application for an amendment shall be administered in the same manner as required for a new application. Any structural alteration, enlargement or intensification change in site plan, or similar change not specially permitted, shall require City Council action and all procedures shall apply as if a new application were being requested; provided, however, that when such changes are deemed to be insignificant by the Zoning Administrator, the requirements of a public hearing may be waived. Page 5 of 6 Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is approximately 1.2 acres and is owned by the Applicant as part of the 2 Pine Tree North plat. 4. The Applicant is proposing an amendment to the approved PUD and CUP to allow a multi- tenant freestanding sign located on the subject property. 5. The Applicant and New Perspective Senior Living have an approved PUD and shared parking agreement. 6. The PUD Development Agreement for New Perspective Senior Living provides for shared access and specified utilization of the subject property. 7. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 8. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Proposed Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: 1) All conditions of the original Condition Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2) A separate sign permit shall be required and multi-tenant signage must meet all requirements of City Code Chapter 12. 3) Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the Applicant shall provide City Staff with a written statement from New Perspective Senior Living of their intent to forego a single-tenant monument sign and agreeing to the placement and utilization of the on-premise multi- tenant sign under the PUD. 4) All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 5) The Applicant, the owner of Outlot A, shall be permitted one freestanding sign on the subject property. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 8, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission. Page 6 of 6 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice and Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 16, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 15, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Existing Sign E. Proposed Sign F. Site Plan G. Final Plat – 2 Pine Tree North   )0>?423B,D =/09477> 4990>:?,  &070;3:90    ,C    BBB.4?D:1,=/093477>:=2 %( )$"- #7,99492,>0!:  %@-84??,7,?0 ;;74.,?4:9:8;70?0/,?0 ..0;?0/-D $0.04;?!@8-0= :@9.470.4>4:9 :@9.470.4>4:9,?0       &&" $* $%(#* %$ ;;74.,9? //=0>> &070;3:90!: "?30= ,C!: 8,47//=0>> (%&(*- $%(#* %$ #=:;0=?D"B90= "B90=//=0>> "B90=&070;3:90!: "?30= //=0>>:1#=:;0=?D9A:7A0/ 02,70>.=4;?4:9 #=:;0=?D!: &D;0:1'>0 *:90 #=:;0=?D.=0,20 -&%'+)* ‰:8;=0309>4A0#7,9809/809?00  >.=:B   ‰:9/4?4:9,7'>0:=9?0=48'>0#0=84? '#:='# 809/809?00 >.=:B   ‰#=074849,=D#7,?00 >.=:B ‰49,7#7,?00 >.=:B ‰:9.0;?#7,9$0A40B00 >.=:B  ‰ ,>?0=#7,990/'94?0A07:;809?:= ,>?0=%;0.4,70A07:;809?#7,900 >.=:B   ‰49,7#7,990/'94?0A07:;809?:=49,7%;0.4,70A07:;809?#7,900  >.=:B  ‰#7,990/'94?0A07:;809?809/809?:=%;0.4,70A07:;809?#7,9809/809?00 >.=:B   ‰%4?0#7,9$0A40B00 >.=:B   ‰$0E:9492:=&#$02@7,?492#7,9809/809?00 >.=:B   ‰*:9492:/0:=&#$0/0A07:;809?:/0809/809?00 >.=:B   ‰4?D:/0809/809?00  >.=:B   ‰:?%;74? 49:=%@-/4A4>4:9$ ,9/$ 4>?=4.?> "97D00  >.=:B  ‰(,=4,9.0:=#0=84??0//5@>?809?00  >.=:B   ‰(,.,?4:9:1,>0809?:=$423?:1),D00  >.=:B   ‰;;0,7:1/8494>?=,?4A00.4>4:900  >.=:B   ‰,9/'>0$0<@0>?>F!:?7=0,/D%;0.4140/00  >.=:B  Bethel University - Glenn Hofer, Director of Facilities Campus Maintenance, Construction, and Operations 3900 Bethel Drive, Arden Hills, MN 55112 651-638-6069 glenn-hofer@bethel.edu Bethel University 3900 Bethel Drive, Arden Hills, MN 55112 651-638-6069 0 Pine Tree Drive and 2 Pine Tree Drive, Arden Hills, MN 55112 343023120012 and 343023130019 1.2 acres and 63.92 acres Office Building See attached exhibit. Attachment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x 0=?,49,;;74.,?4:9>,=0>@-50.??:=0A40B,9/,;;=:A,7-D?30$4.0=006),?0=>30/ 4>?=4.?:9?,.?$)/4=0.?7D,?    1:=,//4?4:9,7491:=8,?4:9 x &307,9/@>0,;;74.,?4:9100>/:9:?.:A0=-@47/492>429:=:?30=;0=84?100>?3,? 8,D-0=0<@4=0/@;:9,;;=:A,7:1,7,9/@>0,;;74.,?4:9 x 77,;;74.,?4:9>B477-0>@-50.??:,//4?4:9,7100>1:==048-@=>0809?:1.:9>@7?,9?.:>?> ,>>:.4,?0/ B4?3 147492 =0A40B492 ,9/ ;=:.0>>492 :1 ,;;74.,?4:949?301:=8:1,9 0>.=:B?:?304?D Seeking City Council approval for a Sign Standard Amendment. Bethel University would like to install a multi-tenant sign along Pine Tree Drive adhering to the requirements of Sign District 4. See attached narrative and sign rendering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ethel University /RFDWLRQ0DS 7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW 3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\ 7D[3DUFHOV &LWLHV &RXQW\2IILFHV $0    PL    NP  5DPVH\&RXQW\ 5DPVH\&RXQW\01 $WWDFKPHQW% 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55430 763-843-0420 3507 Ringsby Court, Suite 105, Denver, CO 80216 720-515-9807 www.bkbm.com 2021-08-02 Jessica Jagoe City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Bethel University Anderson Center Roadway BKBM Project No. 20348.50 Dear Jessica: Bethel University is requesting a sign standard adjustment for the Bethel Anderson Center. The property falls under Sign District 7, however Bethel is requesting an adjustment to Sign District 4. Below are the following criteria for making this adjustment per Section 1260.01 Sign Standard Adjustments – the qualifications for this site are shown in blue: x Subd. 1 – There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonable visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; Because Bethel Anderson Center is a multi-tenant building, a larger sign (meeting Sign District 4 requirements) is necessary for providing adequate space for each tenant’s name to be visible from Pine Tree Drive. The blank placards shown on the rendering will be filled with the Anderson Center tenants’ names. x Subd. 2 – The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; The design of the sign (rendering attached) will be consistent with the design of the Anderson Center building. The brick being used for the monument sign will match that of the building itself. x Subd. 3 – The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. The current land use is Office Building – the sign adjustment will not result in a sign inconsistent with that. The sign adjustment will allow for each office space tenant to list their name on the sign, allowing for visitors to find the building off of Pine Tree Drive. The existing sign is located on property that is no longer owned by Bethel University, requiring the relocation of the sign. The existing sign dimensions are shown on the attached exhibit – it is 13’10” tall, including the landscape wall around it, and has 6’x8’ of sign area, as does the new proposed sign. Attached is a site plan showing the location of the existing monument sign and the location of the proposed monument sign. The proposed sign is to be lit using flood lights. This proposed multi-tenant sign will be the only free-standing monument sign along Pine Tree Drive for the Bethel Anderson Center. This does not replace the single-tenant sign that New Perspectives will have along their property in Outlot A. This is a completely separate sign that will be owned by Bethel and will have space for Bethel Anderson tenants. New Perspectives will also be utilizing a portion of the sign, per an agreement with Bethel, to provide direction from Attachment C Page 2 Pine Tree Drive for visitors to New Perspectives. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Rachel Gilbert, Project Manager BKBM Engineers Direct Line: (763) 843-0481 Copy: F:\20\20348\Correspondence\Governing Agencies\Permits\City\2021-07-19 Land Use Application\2021-08-02 Updated Project Narrative.docx 6' Wide8' Tall4' Tall22" Tall13' 10" Total Height Attachment D SCALE: 1/2” = 1’FILE NAME: NEW-PERSPECTIVE-ARDEN-HILL-MULTI-TENANT-PY-V5.AIAll original designs are exclusive property of Scenic Sign Corp. BOX 881 ST. CLOUD MN 56302 (320) 252-9400 | 1320 5th AVE NE FARGO, ND 58078 1-800-486-8517The client warrants that the subject matter to be printed is not copyrighted by a third party. The client also recognizes that because subject matter does not have to bear a copyright notice in order to be protected by copyright law, absence of such notice does not necessarily assure a right to reproduce. The client further warrants that no copyright notice has been removed from any material used in preparing the subject matter for reproduction. To support these warranties, the client agrees to indemnify and hold Scenic Sign harmless for all liability, damages and attorney fees that may be incurred in any legal action connected with copyright infringement involving the work production of provided.ELECTRICAL: THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUND AND BONDING OF THE SIGN.011/21/43/41/83/85/87/821/21/43/41/83/85/87/8STRUCTURE: ROUND PIPEBASE POLE:O.D.: 6.625”LENGTH: 16’DRILLED PIER FOOTING:3’ DIAMETER 6’ DEEPPIPE FOOTINGTWO PIPEDATE: 4/13/21SALESMAN: DARYL KIRTDRAWN BY: TONY OLAUSON LOCATION: ARDEN HILLSSQ FT: PYLON SIGNWO: # VOLTAGE: 120/277PHOTO EYE:NOCUSTOM CABINETFRAME MATERIAL: 1½” ALUM. SQ. TUBECLADDING: .063 ALUMINUM2 INCH RETAINER1½ INCH DIVIDER BARPAINTED BLACKLEXAN FACEDIGITAL PRINT TRANS VINYL TO MATCH PMS 7700DIGITAL PRINT TRANS VINYL TO MATCH PMS 7597DIGITAL PRINT TRANS VINYL TO MATCH PMS 337WHITE LEDSCUSTOM CABINETFRAME MATERIAL: 1½” ALUM. SQ. TUBECLADDING: .063 ALUMINUM2 INCH RETAINER1½ INCH DIVIDER BARPAINTED BLACKLEXAN FACEDIGITAL PRINT TRANS VINYL (COLOR TO BE DECIDED)DIGITAL PRINT TRANS VINYL (COLOR TO BE DECIDED)WHITE LEDS1 ft - 2 1/8 in14 1/8 in2 ft - 9 1/4 in33 1/4 in21 3/4 in6 ft - 0 in72 in8 ft - 0 in96 in68 in4 in24 in1 ft - 8 in20 inTHE BRICK SHOWN IN THE RENDERINGABOVE IS A PLACEHOLDER. THE BRICK TOBE INSTALLED IS SHOWN IN THE IMAGETO THE LEFT, WHICH WILL MATCH THEANDERSON CENTER BUILDING.Bethel Anderson Center Multi-Tenant Sign $WWDFKPHQW( Attachment F $WWDFKPHQW* Page 1 of 4 PC AGENDA ITEM – 3E MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-023 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: City of Arden Hills Request: Sale of City Owned Parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road Requested Action The Planning Commission shall review and provide a recommendation whether a potential sale of the City owned parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road would be in compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Background Earlier this year, the City was contacted by two interested parties regarding purchasing the City owned parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road (Attachments A & B). City S taff had several internal discussions about how the City acquired the lot and development logistics in adherence to city code requirements. City Staff was unable to obtain title information from the Ramsey County Recorder’s Office document search for the subject parcel. Therefore, the City Attorney was directed to begin the process of a title search in order to obtain an Owners/Encumbrances Report. On August 6th, the City received the completed title report (Attachment C) which confirmed that the property came from State through County as part of turnback of the old Snelling Avenue corridor ROW. There are no deed restrictions prohibiting the City from selling this parcel. Ramsey County records show the value of the parcel at $68,400. The lot is considered a nonconforming lot. The R-1 District requires a 14,000 square foot lot with 95 ft. width and 130 ft. depth. This irregular shaped lot is about 13,500 square feet. The City Attorney has confirmed that a variance for the building of a structure on the lot would be required. At the August 16th City Council Work Session, the Council discussed whether or not there was interest in selling the parcel and directed Staff to proceed with the process for potential listing. Additionally, the Council discussed the options for processing of a variance. The consensus of the Council was that any future listing of the property would disclose to a potential Buyer that they would need to have the variance applied for and approved prior to the closing of the property, as part of the purchase agreement. This way the City has an opportunity to approve the concept of buildability as long as all yard setbacks and design standards are met. The Council did not grant approval of the variance or review potential site layouts. Those items will Page 2 of 4 be considered at a later date and would be up to the Future Buyer to provide documentation on site layout and code compliance. Based off of the direction given by the Council, Staff is presenting this item to the Planning Commission for review of consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City has verified that the parcel is not dedicated for a public purpose that would prohibiting the sale (i.e. park land or public improvements). The parcel is not identified in the City’s Comprehensive Plan as a site for future development to meet the needs of city infrastructure or operational activities. If the Commission recommends the disposal, Staff would begin the process of listing the property and allow a defined period of time for offers to be submitted. Site Evaluation The property at 3588 Ridgewood Road is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has this property guided towards LDR, Low Density Residential. The parcel is currently undeveloped and is expected to be sold for the development of a single-family residential dwelling which is permitted in this zoning district. No additional information is available at this time with regards to future plans for construction. This is a nonconforming lot of record because the lot does not meet the minimum lot requirements in the R-1 zoning district. The parcel has an irregular shape with double road frontage along Ridgewood Road and Snelling Avenue North. Total Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Zoning Code R-1 District 14,000 square feet 95 feet 130 feet 3588 Ridgewood Drive 13,500 square feet Approx. 100 feet Approx. 99 feet to 115 feet As previously noted, the parcel would require a variance for development of the site. However, a Future Buyer would need to demonstrate that future construction of a dwelling meets all applicable city codes with regards to setbacks, FAR, lot coverage, etc. prior to closing of the property. General Procedures City Ordinance Chapter 2, Section 220.03 Subd.2.B for Planning Commission Powers and Duties states the following: B. The Planning Commission shall review the proposed acquisitions and disposal of real property and proposed public improvements to real property and shall advise the City Council in writing whether such acquisitions, disposals, or improvements are in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Municipal Plan. Failure of the Planning Commission to report on the proposal within forty-five (45) days after referral by the City Council or within such other reasonable period as may be designated by the City Council shall be deemed to have satisfied this review requirement. The City Council may, by resolution adopted by an affirmative vote of four (4) Council Members, dispense with this review requirement if in its judgment the City Council determines that such proposal has no relationship to the City's Comprehensive Municipal Plan. The review of the Planning Commission is further instructed in State Statute 462.356, Subd. 2 Procedure to Effect Plan: Generally which requires that, before a City acquire or dispose of any Page 3 of 4 interest in property that the Planning Commission review the proposed transaction for consistency with the comprehensive plan. Below is the language in its entirety from this subdivision: Subd. 2. Compliance with plan. After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after such a reference, or such other period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this subdivision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan. The City Attorney has advised that a public hearing is not required for the disposal of city property. Notification was prepared in accordance with City policy and neighboring property owners were notified. Additional Review David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director, has indicated that water and sewer service stubs do not exist for the property. The extension of services to the property must be connected at the City mainline located within the street which is more costly as a result. This is additional information that would be beneficial to include in the listing and would be at the expense of the Future Buyer to install. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed disposal of real property is in compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. The property at 3588 Ridgewood Road is located in the R-1, Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan has the property guided toward Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use Plan. 3. The subject property is a nonconforming lot. 4. The development of the site for a single family residential dwelling is a permitted use within the R-1 Zoning District. 5. The adjacent properties are developed as single family residential and are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and are guided Low Density Residential uses in the Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 6. The sale of the city owned parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road is determined to be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Page 4 of 4 Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. • Recommend Approval: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-023 recommending that a potential sale of City owned property at 3588 Ridgewood Road would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as presented in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. • Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-023: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial. • Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-023: the Planning Commission should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notices A public hearing is not required for this review. Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Attachments A. Location Map B. Location Map with Dimensions C. Title Search /RFDWLRQ0DS 7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW 3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\ 7D[3DUFHOV &LWLHV &RXQW\2IILFHV $0    PL    NP  5DPVH\&RXQW\ 5DPVH\&RXQW\01 Attachment A /RFDWLRQ0DS 7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW 3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\ 7D[3DUFHOV &LWLHV &RXQW\2IILFHV (DVHPHQWVW 0LVF(DVHPHQWV 'LWFK&RXQW\ -XGLFLDO 2WKHU 3DUNLQJ 3HGHVWULDQ 3ULYDWH$FFHVV 3ULYDWH'ULYHZD\ $0   PL   NP  5DPVH\&RXQW\ 5DPVH\&RXQW\01 $WWDFKPHQW% Land Title, Inc. (Main Office)· 2200 County Road C West, Suite 2205 • Roseville, MN 55113 website landtitleinc.com • phone 651.638.1900 • fax 651.638.1994 August 6, 2021 Re: Customer: TBD Property Address: 3588 Ridgewood Road, Arden Hills, MN 55112 Your Reference No. LT File No.: 642966 Enclosed herewith please find the item(s) requested. Thank you for choosing Land Title, Inc., we appreciate your business. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Land Title, Inc. 2200 County Road C West, Suite 2205 Email Not Assigned Phone Attachment C Page 1 of 2 LT File Number: 642966 Report prepared on: August 6, 2021 Prepared for: Campbell Knutson 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Attn: Jean Olson Client File No.: PROPERTY REPORT Applicant:City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation Property Address:3588 Ridgewood Road, Arden Hills, MN 55112 County:Ramsey State:Minnesota Property Type:Abstract Property LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART LYING SOUTHERLY OF KENNA ADDITION, NORTHERLY OF ARDEN HILLS PLAT, WESTERLY OF HIGHWAY 51 AND EASTERLY OF RIDGEWOOD ROAD IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 23, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. NOTE: This is a Ramsey County Tax Department Legal Description. APPARENT RECORD OWNER: City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation QUIT CLAIM DEED: County of Ramsey, a Minnesota political subdivision to City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation ; DOCUMENT NO.: 2056072; DATED: December 18, 1978; FILED: September 21, 1979. OPEN MORTGAGES AND LIENS: 1. CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM DEED (SHOWN FOR REFERENCE) Document No.: 1964787 Dated: May 30, 1974 Filed: May 11, 1977 2. PLAT OF ARDEN HILLS (SHOWN FOR REFERENCE) 3. PLAT OF KENNA ADDITION (SHOWN FOR REFERENCE) Page 2 of 2 TAX INFORMATION: Tax I.D. No.: 34-30-23-22-0033 Taxes for the year 2021: $0.00, Total, are 1st 1/2 Paid, 2nd 1/2 Paid Delinquent Tax: None Base Tax: $0 (Non-Homestead) Estimated Market Value: $68,400.00 Assessed in the name of: City of Arden Hills This Property Report is not a title examination, title opinion, title insurance commitment or title insurance policy. This report is furnished for the use and benefit of the requesting party. The liability of the reporting company caused by inaccuracies contained herein is limited to the amount paid for in said report. Land Title, Inc. • 2200 West County Road C, Suite 2205, Roseville, MN 55113 • phone (651) 638-1900 • fax (651) 697-6185 • landtitleinc.com POSTED EFFECTIVE DATE: 23rd day of July, 2021 By: An Authorized Signature