The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-11-21-RAPPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES STAFF COMMENTS Transportation Update David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 13, 2021 Regular City Council 09 -13 -21 -R.PDF September 20, 2021 City Council Work Session 09 -20 -21 -WS.PDF September 27, 2021 Regular City Council 09 -27 -21 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst CLAIMS AND PAYROLL 10 -11 -21.PDF Motion To Approve Additional Comp Time Hours For Union Employees Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve 2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements –Payment No. 4 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal For Performing The Warranty Repair Inspection On The North Tower David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve MVHS PUD Agreement, Planning Case #21 -017 Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Steve Scott Regular City Council Agenda October 11, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER -Declare October 11, 2021 a Non -Holiday to Conduct City Business 1. 2. 3. 4. 4.A. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 13, 2021 Regular City Council 09 -13 -21 -R.PDF September 20, 2021 City Council Work Session 09 -20 -21 -WS.PDF September 27, 2021 Regular City Council 09 -27 -21 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst CLAIMS AND PAYROLL 10 -11 -21.PDF Motion To Approve Additional Comp Time Hours For Union Employees Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve 2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements –Payment No. 4 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal For Performing The Warranty Repair Inspection On The North Tower David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve MVHS PUD Agreement, Planning Case #21 -017 Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaOctober 11, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER -Declare October 11, 2021 a Non -Holiday to Conduct City Business1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESSeptember 13, 2021 Regular City Council09-13 -21 -R.PDFSeptember 20, 2021 City Council Work Session09-20 -21 -WS.PDFSeptember 27, 2021 Regular City Council09-27 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystCLAIMS AND PAYROLL 10 -11 -21.PDFMotion To Approve Additional Comp Time Hours For Union EmployeesDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve 2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements –Payment No. 4David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Proposal For Performing The Warranty Repair Inspection On The North Tower David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve MVHS PUD Agreement, Planning Case #21 -017 Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaOctober 11, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER -Declare October 11, 2021 a Non -Holiday to Conduct City Business1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESSeptember 13, 2021 Regular City Council09-13 -21 -R.PDFSeptember 20, 2021 City Council Work Session09-20 -21 -WS.PDFSeptember 27, 2021 Regular City Council09-27 -21 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystCLAIMS AND PAYROLL 10 -11 -21.PDFMotion To Approve Additional Comp Time Hours For Union EmployeesDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve 2021 PMP Street And Utility Improvements –Payment No. 4David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Proposal For Performing The Warranty Repair Inspection On The North TowerDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve MVHS PUD Agreement, Planning Case #21 -017Jessica Jagoe, Senior PlannerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSPlanning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi)Jessica Jagoe, Senior PlannerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFATTACHMENT K.PDFATTACHMENT L.PDFATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Case 21 -019 Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties (Aldi) Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaOctober 11, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER -Declare October 11, 2021 a Non -Holiday to Conduct City Business1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:7.8.8.A.Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 4A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: October 11, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator David Swearingen, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Transportation Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. Approved: October 11, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung (attending via Zoom) and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; Interim Public Works Director David Swearingen; Senior Planner Jessica Jagoe; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 4. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 2 Interim Public Works Director Swearingen reported the 2021 PMP project was nearing completion. He explained the entire project area has been paved with the first layer of asphalt and the second layer will be placed later this month. He indicated crews were now working on topsoil and sod in disturbed areas. Councilmember Scott asked if the I-35W project was nearing completion. Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated the I-35W MNPASS project was completed and only minor signage and striping work remains. Councilmember Holden requested the Council discuss a permanent traffic signal at County Road E2 at a future worksession meeting. Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained the County would be conducting a traffic study next year once traffic has fallen into a new pattern. If there is a strong warrant for a signal, this will be added into the County’s Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 9, 2021, Regular City Council MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the August 9, 2021, Regular City Council meeting minutes as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Acknowledge the Application of Catholic United Financial for an Exempt Permit to Conduct a Raffle with the Drawing Being March 10, 2022 with No Waiting Period C. Motion to Acknowledge the Application of Fishing for Life for an Exempt Permit to Conduct a Raffle with the Drawing Being October 9, 2021 with No Waiting Period D. Motion to Approve Mediated Settlement Agreement and Release – Sunram Construction, Inc. Litigation E. Motion to Approve North Suburban Access Corporation Professional and Technical Services Agreement F. Motion to Approve Payment No. 7 to Air Express, Inc. – City Hall HVAC Replacement Project G. Motion to Accept Resignation of Accounting Clerk H. Motion to Authorize Recruitment of Accounting Clerk I. Motion to Approve Ordering Replacement Control Panel – Lift Station 3 J. Motion to Approve Payment No. 3 and Change Order No. 2 – C&L Excavating, Inc. – 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project K. Motion to Approve Professional Services Agreement for Design and Construction Services with TKDA – Arden Oaks Street Improvement Project ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 3 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 7. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Set Preliminary Levy and Establish Truth-In-Taxation Public Hearing Date for Proposed Taxes Payable in 2022 • Resolution 2021-049 – Preliminary Levy • Resolution 2021-050 – Preliminary Levy – Karth Lake Special Taxing District • Resolution 2021-051 – Truth-In-Taxation Public Hearing Date Finance Director Bauman explained State law requires that cities certify their proposed property tax levies to the County Auditor by September 30th. The proposed tax levy that is given preliminary approval may be lowered but cannot be increased. Therefore, it is important that the proposed tax levy provides adequate revenues to finance the 2022 Budget. The City Council needs to decide the maximum levy that it is willing to approve and then adopt the proposed resolution. It was noted the final levy will be set in December 2021. A budget workshop was held with the Council on August 16, 2021. Staff was directed to provide proposed maximum levy increase options from 3% to 5%. There will be another budget workshop in either October or November, prior to the final levy and budget adoption meeting in December. Staff commented further on the 2022 preliminary levy, noting the projected revenues and expenditures, and recommended approval. Mayor Grant questioned when the Truth-In-Taxation Hearing would be held. Finance Director Bauman stated this meeting would be held on December 13, 2021. Councilmember Holden asked why street maintenance, sealcoating and resurfacing was decreased within the budget. Finance Director Bauman explained in 2021 the City spent under $200,000 for street maintenance and the Public Works Director expects to do the similar amount of work in 2022. Councilmember Holden indicated street maintenance was important to her and came at a great value for the City when compared to full street reconstruction projects. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 4 Councilmember McClung stated he was comfortable with setting the levy at 3%. Councilmember Holden requested further information regarding the public safety increases projected for 2022. Finance Director Bauman reported the expenses were estimated to increase by $75,520 in 2022. Councilmember Holmes expressed concern with setting the levy increase at 3%. She believed this was too low. She commented on the personnel changes that were occurring at City Hall and noted other changes may occur in 2022. She recommended the levy increase be set at 5% noting this amount can always be reduced by December. Councilmember Scott concurred with Councilmember Holmes. He feared that the City was underfunding its operations. While this may be okay for a couple of years, he believed it would benefit the City to set the max levy at 5% versus 3%. Councilmember Holden commented she could support setting the tax levy at 5% at this time, but would want this percentage reduced in December. Mayor Grant questioned what the underfunded amount was within the budget at 3%. Finance Director Bauman explained this was currently $242,690. Mayor Grant commented on the transfers out of the budget that occur on a yearly basis. He reported these transfers were put into the PIR fund. He was of the opinion that the City could keep the levy a little lower given the history of the transfers that have occurred over the past eight years. He supported setting the preliminary levy at 4.5%. He stated he would like to see this number move lower by December, because it can. Councilmember Holmes discussed the transfers out, noting that residents of Arden Hills were asking for more capital improvements, which were covered by the PIR fund. Mayor Grant reviewed the 2021 tax rates for cities in Ramsey County. He noted Arden Hills was one of the lowest in the County. He recommended the levy be set at 4% to 4.5%. Councilmember McClung indicated he could support the tax levy increasing to 4%. Councilmember Holden agreed the preliminary levy should be set at 4% to 4.5%. She commented further on the levy percentages and PIR transfers that had been approved over the past eight years. She stated she could not support a preliminary tax levy of 5%. Mayor Grant asked if the Councilmembers supporting a 5% levy increase could support this being reduced to 4.5% at this time. Councilmember Holmes stated she could support this. Councilmember Scott commented stated he could support 4.5% as well. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 5 Finance Director Bauman discussed the adjusted amount of the levy with the Council if the percentage were set at 4.5%. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2021-049 – Setting the Preliminary Levy for Taxes Payable in 2022 setting the Preliminary Levy at 4.5% with a total certified about payable at $4,472,680. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried 4-1 (Councilmember McClung opposed). MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2021-050 – Setting the Preliminary Levy for Taxes Payable in 2022 for the Karth Lake Special Taxing District. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2021-051 – Approving the Truth-In-Taxation Public Hearing Date for Proposed Taxes Payable in 2022. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember McClung stated he had an opportunity to attend the Lake Johanna Fire Department Annual Meeting and joined with firefighters to celebrate retirements and new hires. He explained this was a nice opportunity for the cities to show their support of the fire department. Councilmember Holmes reported school was back in session. She encouraged drivers to watch for congestion around the Mounds View High School and to drive carefully as children were waiting for buses. Councilmember Holmes explained the Arden Hills cleanup day would be held on October 2 at Green Recycling in Blaine from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Councilmember Holmes stated an Open House would be held at Tony Schmidt Park for the Lake Johanna Boulevard Trail on October 5 from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Holmes reported the State of the City event was coming up and to watch for more information about the format of the event. Councilmember Holden thanked staff for their tremendous efforts on the 2021 street improvement project. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 6 Councilmember Holden stated on September 18 the Rotary Club would be painting the Perry Park ice skating rink from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mayor Grant reported he met with neighboring Mayor and City Administrators this afternoon and exchanged information regarding ongoing projects and preliminary levies. Mayor Grant also urged residents to participate in the October 2 cleanup day. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:55 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: Approved: October 11, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Fran Holmes, Steve Scott, Dave McClung (attending remotely) and Brenda Holden (attending remotely) Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault, Interim Public Works Director David Swearingen, Deputy City Clerk Jolene Trauba, and Bolton & Menk Project Engineer Brad Fisher 1.AGENDA ITEMS A.Snelling Avenue Improvements – Design Discussion Mayor Grant asked if the three designs head been confirmed approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District and MSA. Bolton & Menk Project Engineer Fisher replied they had been. There would be some future permit items for the watershed but permanent storm water management and meeting State Aid rules had been signed off on. Mr. Fisher stated they would review the project background, the State Aid design standards and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements, three design options and the associated costs. The project is on Snelling Avenue North from Highway 51 to County Road E. Mr. Fisher explained the design analysis; evaluation of alternative designs for the corridor, meetings with the MSA office, and possibility of variance approval. Councilmember Scott asked if the road currently met the MSA standards. Mr. Fisher replied that the existing roadway does meet MSA for rehabilitation but not for reconstruction. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 2 Mr. Fisher explained the difference between rural and urban roadways, reconditioning versus replacement, and a walk versus a trail. This project area is currently considered rural with no curb and gutter, but they could reconstruct it as half rural and half urban. He reviewed the State Aid Design Standards for rural and urban roads, and shared use paths (trails). Councilmember Holden asked if smaller lane width slows people down from speeding. Mr. Fisher replied that was correct, but a road being physically narrower will have a greater impact than just striping the road narrower. Mr. Fisher explained the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The project is not considered a reconstruction by their definition. Permits will be required for erosion/sediment control and wetland impacts. Mr. Fisher discussed the three design options and objectives. He presented drawings of the options and explained each. Option 1 would be to leave the roadway as a Rural Typical Section that would match the existing corridor design. Option 2 would be a Rural/Urban Typical Section that provides on-road space for bicycles and an off-road concrete walk for pedestrians. Option 3 would be an Urban Typical Section providing an off-road shared use trail for bicycle and pedestrian users. Councilmember McClung asked if Option 3 was best for traffic calming. Mr. Fisher responded that it was the best option for traffic calming. Mayor Grant asked if Option 3 offered future reconstruction options and ease of design. Mr. Fisher said assuming rules don’t change, there would be no reason why a similar technique on a future reconstruction using reclamation couldn’t be done. Councilmember Holmes felt Option 3 was the safest with the road being narrower for traffic calming, and pedestrians and bicyclists off the road. Councilmember Scott asked if there was a minimum design speed on Option 3. Mr. Fisher replied there was not. Interim Public Works Director Swearingen added they had jurisdiction over the speed limit but they couldn’t alter it because of MSA rules. Mr. Fisher compared the costs of the three options which included estimated construction costs with a 15% contingency and estimated total project costs with Engineering design, administration and overhead. Councilmember Holden asked what the tree removal fee would be for each option. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 3 Mr. Fisher stated there would be no additional charge as they were planning to stick to the original 40-foot footprint, unless there were some utilities work that would require it. Councilmember Holmes wondered if the public should be able to comment on all three designs. Mayor Grant thought they should decide on a preferred design. Councilmember Holmes felt Option 3 was the best design with the walkway on the east. Councilmember Scott felt Option 3 with walk on the west. Mayor Grant liked Option 3 but was undecided which side he preferred for the walkway. Councilmember McClung also liked Option 3 with the walkway on the east due to fewer driveway crossings. Councilmember Holden was agreeable to Option 2 or 3, but liked the west side for the walkway. Mr. Fisher will coordinate a public meeting and present all three options for review and comment. Feedback received from the meeting will be presented to Council. Councilmember Holden requested they provide artist rendering drawings at the public meeting in addition to the cross-section drawings. B. State of the City Update City Administrator Perrault stated that the State of the City is currently set as in in-person event at the Marsden Room in the Ramsey County Public Works building. He asked if Council would like to keep it as an in-person event. Councilmember Scott said he would like to plan for in-person but be flexible. Councilmember Holmes agreed to leave it live because of the date coming up soon. Councilmember McClung said he was torn on which path to choose. City Administrator Perrault noted there should discuss and assign topics and reviewed the current list. Councilmember Holmes felt they only needed Arden Hills Foundation under City Points of Interest. She would like to add a section about trails; expense and how Council sets priorities. She felt they didn’t need a litigation update, but they should talk about TCAAP. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 4 Councilmember Scott asked if they’d talk about COVID affecting city finances and staffing issues. City Administrator Perrault said they would talk about the small business relief grant and could add a note about staffing. Dave McClung noted that he would probably not be at a live meeting. Councilmember Holden couldn’t guarantee that she could be there. City Administrator Perrault suggested they consider a pre-recorded video now and a live event in the spring. Councilmember Holmes agreed with that idea. Councilmember McClung thought they could prepare as though everyone would be there in person or via Zoom. He would like to participate if possible. Councilmember Scott said he would agree to a pre-recorded video now and a formal event in the spring. After further discussion it was decided each Councilmember would take a section and pre-record it, to be compiled by NineNorth, and they could possibly have an in-person event in the spring. It was agreed the video release could be pushed back to late October or early November. C. Lake Johanna Fire Department Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Discussion City Administrator Perrault reported that last year cities of Arden Hills, North Oaks and Shoreview entered into an agreement to facilitate purchasing the land for a new fire station. Setting up a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) now will allow authority and flexibility to pursue different funding options, such as issuing bonds. The JPA would be officially formed when the fire department transfers the land to the JPA and the voting structure would require 4/5ths for any action (the votes would be Shoreview 3 members, Arden Hills 1 member, and North Oaks 1 member). The approval of the JPA would ideally happen by all three cities prior to October 15, but they could extend to the end of the year if necessary. Councilmember McClung suggested they give each city one vote. Councilmember Holden agreed. Councilmember Scott also agreed but didn’t have an issue with 3-1-1. Councilmember McClung said he understands the reasoning of the 4/5 vote but felt a 1-1-1 vote would move the cities forward as a group. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 5 City Administrator Perrault noted that North Oaks has authorized their City Administrator to enter in an agreement, Shoreview hadn’t taken it to their Council . He discussed the pros and cons of the 3-1-1 voting proposal. Councilmember McClung said he was looking for consensus and liked the 1-1-1 option better. Mayor Grant mentioned that in a 3-1-1 model, if Shoreview wanted to veto something they could vote their 3 shares and the other two cities are outvoted. But an affirmative vote by Shoreview would be the same as 1-1-1. He felt it basically gives Shoreview veto power. Discussion continued regarding the voting preference. City Administrator Perrault stated he was hearing a 1-1-1 preference and would take that to Shoreview for consideration. He asked if they had a preference for or against an option for a non - voting board member for Shoreview that would potentially give them an extra voice in conversations instead of the 3-1-1 vote. Councilmember Holmes suggested the Board have five members as presented but only one voting member from each city. Councilmember Holden didn’t like the idea of a non-voting member. Councilmember McClung noted the non-voting member would still need to be an elected official. Further discussion ensued. Mayor Grant directed staff to go forward with 1-1-1. Councilmember Holden thought it might look better for the legislative process to have a 1-1-1 vote. Councilmember Holmes asked if the fire department was seeking a financial source for the new station. City Administrator Perrault explained they are working with the three cities providing background and statistics. The JPA could seek bonds or the cities could individually, as agreed to by the board. Councilmember Holden stated that if there was funding needed the board could decide how they would want to raise funds. City Administrator Perrault said they could add “unless otherwise agreed upon”. Councilmember Holms asked if there might be other cities that would want to join the JDA. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 6 Councilmember McClung felt other local cities have their own departments and couldn’t imagine any other city would want to join our district. D. Work Session Discussion Councilmember Holden wondered if the number of work session items could be balanced more from meeting to meeting. She would be open to more but shorter work sessions. She also suggested possibly not having the first regular meetings in January, February and March. Mayor Grant commented that the organizational meeting in January could be combined with the second meeting. Councilmember McClung said he was in favor of one regular meeting the first three months of the year. Councilmember Holden said they used to do the organizational meeting in December. Mayor Grant directed staff to combine the organizational meeting with December or January’s second meeting, and staff could potentially cancel the first meetings in January, February and March. E. Public Comments Discussion Councilmember Holden said if they are voting on something with a deadline why would a resident want to stand up to speak to Council when they would assume Councilmember’s mi nds would already be made up. Councilmember McClung said he was in favor of constraining time for comments, possibly put public comments at the end of the meeting, but people should be able to talk. Councilmember Holden suggested they do a test period. Mayor Grant reported that he talked to the City Attorney and he acknowledged that other cities councils do public comments differently and they were free to change, but suggested field-testing changes for a period of time. It would be up to the Council to decide what parameters they’d like. Councilmember Holden said she is in favor of the City Attorney suggesting parameters to be discussed. She suggested a six-month test run. City Administrator Perrault said he will work with the City Attorney and Mayor to revise the agenda notation for public comments. Mayor Grant suggested he send an email to Council with the changes and they can start the trial with the first meeting of October. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 7 F. Council Tracker Mayor Grant suggested the Council review the tracker on their own and report any changes or additions to Staff. Roll call was taken to close the meeting for Item G. G. Union Negotiations Update (Closed per M.S. 13D.03, Subd. 1(b) and 179A.01 to 179A.25) City Administrator Perrault gave the City Council an update regarding contract negotiations and asked for direction. The meeting was reopened for Council and Staff Comments. 2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS Councilmember Holmes remarked that there is a lightly marked crosswalk at Mounds View High School that shouldn’t be used and wondered if staff was able to reach anyone regarding it. City Administrator Perrault said it has been repainted but the color is slightly different from the asphalt so it still looks like a crosswalk. Councilmember Holmes said there is another area to the east that is also being used. Councilmember Scott noted there was a program run by the Metropolitan Council for water conservation that may be worthwhile to look into. He also thought the Council should consider modifying the ordinance that limits the number of drive-through restaurants. Mayor Grant asked for an update on the EAB. Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said the company may be able to get the trees treated next week. Mayor Grant asked for an update on ICWC workers as they didn’t show up the last time they were scheduled. Interim Public Works Director Swearingen responded there was a last minute scheduling conflict so they are making a more formal agreement. There was an issue with the quality of workers earlier this summer that was reported to the group leader and they have cycled some workers out of the program. Mayor Grant said he has received feedback regarding Ramsey County Parks possibly being left open 24/7. He asked staff to put a newsflash on the website regarding the issue. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 8 ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 8:01 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Jolene Trauba David Grant Deputy City Clerk Mayor Approved: October 11, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Fran Holmes, Dave McClung (attending via Zoom) and Steve Scott Absent: Councilmember Brenda Holden (excused) Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Interim Public Works Director David Swearingen; Senior Planner Jessica Jagoe; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; City Attorney Joel Jamnik; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). 2.PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES A.Public Inquiry Response from August 9, 2021 City Council Meeting City Administrator Perrault stated a resident approached the Council regarding the Public Inquiry section of the agenda. He noted the Council discussed this topic at the August and September worksession meetings. He reported the Council decided to move forward with relaxing language surrounding the public inquiry portion of the agenda and would be working ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 2 with the City Attorney on this matter. Staff anticipated this language would be available in October. 4. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director Swearingen reported the 2021 PMP Street and Utility project was nearing completion. He reported the final section of paving was scheduled for October 13 and 14. He noted topsoil and sod would be installed yet this fall. He encouraged residents seeking up to date information to review the City’s website. B. Clean Up Day Update City Administrator Perrault stated Clean Up Day will be held on Saturday, October 2 at Green Lights Recycling in Blaine from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. He reported a list of accepted items and coupons were available online or in the most recent edition of Arden Hills Notes. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 16, 2021, City Council Work Session B. August 23, 2021, Regular City Council Councilmember Holmes reported she had a small change to the Work Session minutes on Page 6 and noted the changes were discussed with City staff. Councilmember Scott noted he had small change to the Work Session minutes and noted the change was sent to City staff. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to approve the August 16, 2021, City Council Work Session meeting minutes as amended, and August 23, 2021, Regular City Council meeting minutes as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-052 Accepting a Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation C. Motion to Approve Convention and Tourism Bureau Agreement with Minnesota Metro North Tourism D. Motion to Approve Payment No. 1 and Change Order No. 1 – Pember Construction – Hamline Avenue and Shorewood Drive Improvements E. Motion to Approve Appointment of Public Works Director ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 3 MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). 7. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Finance Director Bauman stated water customers whose account is 90 days past due were informed that the City intends to certify delinquent charges to Ramsey County to be collected with property taxes. These customers have the right to a hearing in front of the City Council to discuss this matter prior to certification. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. B. Special Assessments for False Alarm Charges Finance Director Bauman stated notices were mailed to property owners on August 18, 2021, informing them of their account status and the City’s intent to certify any unpaid delinquent amounts to Ramsey County for collection with property taxes. They were asked to pay the delinquent balance prior to the public hearing, which is scheduled for September 27. The public hearing allows the property owners the opportunity to address the City Council on this matter prior to certification. To date, two accounts remain unpaid. Arden Hills’ Municipal Code authorizes the certification of delinquent charges against the properties on which the alarm systems are installed. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. C. Planning Case 21-020 – Planned Unit Development Amendment – Bethel University Senior Planner Jagoe stated Bethel University (“The Applicant”) is requesting a Planned Unit Development Amendment for a proposed project located on Outlot A (“Subject Property”) within the 2 Pine Tree North Plat for a multi-tenant freestanding sign. The subject property falls within Sign District 7. With the recent subdivision of land, the Applicant no longer owns the parcel of land where their existing multi-tenant sign is located. The existing sign exceeds the height and sign area as allowed in this sign district. With the construction of a new sign, the Applicant is ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 4 subject to compliance with the applicable sign district regulations. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to Sign District 4. Senior Planner Jagoe explained in 2013, Bethel University acquired the Country Financial facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive. The subject property is located within the B-2 General Business District, where higher educational uses are permitted by Conditional Use Permit (CUP). At its November 25, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a CUP for Bethel University to use the existing facility as higher education. The campus is referenced as their “Anderson Center” location. The approx. 227,000 square foot multi-tenant building is a mixture of higher education and office/commercial uses. Senior Planner Jagoe reported the property was subdivided in 2020 and split into three lots and an outlot to be used for utilities and access drive within the plat. Bethel University retained their parcel with existing development and Outlot A. At that same time, a Master Planned Unit Development was approved. Subsequently a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in January 2021 for New Perspective Senior Living to be developed on Lot 1. Lot 2 was sold to the Lake Johanna Fire Department and is currently undeveloped. Bethel University has an existing multi-tenant freestanding sign that is located along Pine Tree Drive on Lot 2. They are planning to move the multi-tenant freestanding sign to Outlot A which is owned by Bethel University. With this relocation, the Applicant is planning upgrades to the freestanding sign design and size. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the Site Data and Plan Evaluation in further detail with the Council and requested the Council hold a Public Hearing. Mayor Grant stated there was 15 feet of right of way from the curb on Pine Tree Drive. Senior Planner Jagoe reported this was the case. She explained from the road edge to the sign front there would be 20 feet. Councilmember Holmes questioned how far south the sign would be from County Road E2. Senior Planner Jagoe indicated there was one property north of this, meaning the sign would be just south of the Old National Bank property. Councilmember Holmes reported this sign would be located along the new road. Senior Planner Jagoe stated this was the case. Further discussion ensued regarding the location of the new sign. Councilmember Scott clarified the existing sign was being removed in order for the new sign to be installed. Senior Planner Jagoe reported this would be done in order to move the sign from the fire department property to Bethel property. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 5 With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. D. Planning Case 20-022 – Zoning Code Amendment – Chapter 13 – Section 1325.07, Subd. 6A – Keeping of Chickens Senior Planner Jagoe stated starting in 2020, the City Council began discussions on ordinance language with regards to the keeping of chickens in Arden Hills. A survey was conducted in November 2020 to garner input from residents on the relaxation of standards for the keeping of chickens. Those survey results were presented to the City Council at a work session in January. Staff was provided guidance on general parameters for consideration of a proposed chickens ordinance. That draft language was reviewed by the City Council at two work sessions on July 12th and July 26th, 2021. Senior Planner Jagoe reported in preparing the draft ordinance language, the City deferred to the document that is used by a number of adjacent communities titled “Recommendations for Municipal Regulation of Urban Chickens”. This guide was the basis for development of ordinance standards and best practices for licensing requirements. Similar to the Cities of Stillwater and Falcon Heights, the proposed language includes a requirement that a resident who intends to keep chickens shall have read the document outlining best care practices. At the July 26th special work session, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission in September for the first review and to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the keeping of chickens. Staff discussed the Ordinance amendments in further detail and requested the Council hold a Public Hearing. Mayor Grant suggested the language within Subd. 6, Item D be reconsidered to address both single and double car detached garages. Councilmember McClung commented on the email he received from a property owner in the southwestern end of the City. He explained he supported keeping coop and detached structures under the 728 square feet. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Mike Loosbrock, 4535 Lakeshore Place, discussed the proposed Ordinance amendments. He noted he and his wife did not make the Tuesday, September 8 Planning Commission meeting because it was the first day of school. He addressed the number of chickens that would be allowed. He noted chickens were a flock animal and he believed three chickens was too low of a number. He indicated the number of birds also assisted in keeping the birds warm during the winter months. He commented further on how egg production ebbs and flows during the winter months and with only three birds this would not provide very many eggs. He encouraged the City to reconsider having a maximum of eight birds. He proposed the language for the coop size be set with a minimum per bird (four square feet). He discussed the proposed temperature requirements and stated they were not practical. He noted chickens were cold hardy animals and noted supplemental heat was only needed to keep the eggs from freezing. He commented on how important it was to properly ventilate the coops, especially in the winter months. He believed it was onerous to require neighbor consent, especially given the strict rules that were in place for the keeping of chickens. He discussed the screening requirements and noted some neighbors may ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 6 enjoy seeing the chickens. He recommended neighbor consent not be required. He explained that leg banding was not common and suggested this not be required. He commented on the references that were made within the Chicken Ordinance and recommended the City refer to the University of Minnesota Extension Office for a better balance of information. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution 2021-053 Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Finance Director Bauman stated delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated August 11, 2021 were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by September 17, 2021. Utility accounts with an unpaid delinquent balance would be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property taxes payable in 2022. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an eight percent penalty. The list of remaining delinquent utility accounts, as of September 21, 2021 was reviewed by staff. The City will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the respective properties. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2021-053 – Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). B. Resolution 2021-054 Adopting and Confirming Special Assessments for False Alarm Charges Finance Director Bauman stated the City Council held a public hearing under Item 8B regarding special assessment certification of delinquent false alarm charges. The City will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the properties on which the alarm systems are installed. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2021-054 – Adopting and Confirming Special Assessments for False Alarm Charges. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). C. Planning Case 21-020 – Planned Unit Development Amendment – Bethel University Senior Planner Jagoe stated Bethel University (“The Applicant”) is requesting a Planned Unit Development Amendment for a proposed project located on Outlot A (“Subject Property”) within the 2 Pine Tree North Plat for a multi-tenant freestanding sign. The subject property falls within Sign District 7. With the recent subdivision of land, the Applicant no longer owns the parcel of ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 7 land where their existing multi-tenant sign is located. The existing sign exceeds the height and sign area as allowed in this sign district. With the construction of a new sign, the Applicant is subject to compliance with the applicable sign district regulations. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to Sign District 4. Senior Planner Jagoe reported the City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 21-020 under Agenda Item 8C. A full evaluation of the proposed amendment and supporting documents are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 8C. Staff reviewed the request in further detail and offered the following Findings of Fact: 1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. 2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. 3. The Subject Property is approximately 1.2 acres and is owned by the Applicant as part of the 2 Pine Tree North plat. 4. The Applicant is proposing an amendment to the approved PUD and CUP to allow a multitenant freestanding sign located on the subject property. 5. The Applicant and New Perspective Senior Living have an approved PUD and shared parking agreement. 6. The PUD Development Agreement for New Perspective Senior Living provides for shared access and specified utilization of the subject property. 7. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 8. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. 9. A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 10. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 8, 2021. Senior Planner Jagoe explained the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 8, 2021 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval with conditions of the Bethel University application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment by a 5-0 vote. She reported staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21-020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 27, 2021, Report to the City Council: 1) All conditions of the original Condition Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2) A separate sign permit shall be required and multi-tenant signage must meet all requirements of City Code Chapter 12. 3) Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the Applicant shall provide City Staff with a written statement from New Perspective Senior Living of their intent to forego a single-tenant monument sign and agreeing to the placement and utilization of the on-premise multitenant sign under the PUD. 4) All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. 5) The PUD Amendment shall limit Outlot A to only one freestanding sign, regardless of who owns or has an interest in the Outlot. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 8 Councilmember Scott asked if the proposed exterior lighting would be a concern at this location, especially during the winter months. Senior Planner Jagoe deferred this question to the applicant. She noted externally lit signs were allowed in this zoning district. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve Planning Case 21-020 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 27, 2021, Report to the City Council. Councilmember Holmes requested further information regarding the conditions for approval. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the conditions for approval and noted New Perspective Senior Living would not be allowed to install their own single tenant monument sign. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). D. Ordinance 2021-008 Amending Zoning Code Chapter 13 – Section 1325.07, Subd. 6A – Planning Case 20-022 – Keeping of Chickens Senior Planner Jagoe stated the City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 21-022 under Agenda Item 8D. A full evaluation of the proposed amendment and supporting documents are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 8D. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 8, 2021, meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration: 1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language to allow for the keeping of chickens. 2. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning Code of the City Code. 3. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. 4. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 8, 2021 Senior Planner Jagoe reported the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 8, 2021 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of Planning Case 21-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to add language to the ordinance to allow chickens coops as an accessory structure in the residential zoning districts and revisions to the City Code amending Section 400.01, Definitions and adding language to Section 410.01, Subd. 3, Chickens License by a 5-0 vote. Staff recommended the Council approve adoption of ordinance and authorization to publish summary ordinance for Planning Case 21- 022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 and Sections 400 and 410 of the Arden Hills City Code to allow the keeping of chickens in residential zoning districts based on the findings of fact and the September 27, 2021 Report to the City Council. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 9 MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to approve an ordinance No. 2021-008 for Planning Case 21-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 and Sections 400 and 410 of the Arden Hills City Code to allow the keeping of chickens in residential zoning districts based on the findings of fact and the September 27, 2021 Report to the City Council with a language change striking the term single car from Sub 6A, Subsection B so that it reads detached garage. Councilmember Holmes stated she was pleased the City was following the Urban Chicken information, but noted the leg banding was a Council recommendation. She explained the Council believed it would be valuable to have chickens leg banded in the event they were to escape their coop. However, she was second guessing this recommendation now due to the fact the Urban Chicken people did not support leg banding. She suggested the Council discuss this topic further. Councilmember Scott explained the City required vaccinations and tags for other domesticated animals and for this reason, he would support leg banding for chickens. Councilmember McClung reported he supported keeping the language as is. Mayor Grant commented he would like to leave the language in place as well. He understood that the language was not common but would help the City identify missing or stray birds. Councilmember Holmes thanked the Council for their feedback. She asked that the chicken keeping Ordinance be reviewed at a Council work session in one year. Councilmember Scott stated he agreed with the resident that spoke this evening and recommended the number of birds in the flock be raised to at least four but no more than six. Councilmember Holmes explained the Council discussed this topic a number of times and the idea was to start with three with the understanding the chicken keeping Ordinance would be reviewed after one year. Councilmember McClung stated he was comfortable leaving the number of birds at three knowing this would be reviewed again in one year. Mayor Grant concurred noting the keeping of chickens in general, including the number of birds, could be reviewed in one year. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to Authorize Publication of Summary Ordinance 2021-008. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 10 E. Ordinance 2021-009 Amending the 2021 Fee Schedule in Relation to Chicken License Fees and Zoning Permit (Chicken Coops) and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance Mayor Grant noted that in conjunction with the Ordinance update as discussed in the previous agenda item regarding the keeping of chickens, a fee for a chicken license and a zoning permit would need to be included in the City’s Fee Schedule. Councilmember Scott noted the proposed fee was for a two year license to keep chickens. Mayor Grant stated this was the case, noting it was a flat fee, not per bird. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2021-009 Amending Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule regarding a license for the keeping of chickens and zoning permit (chicken coop) and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance 2021-009. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember McClung congratulated David Swearingen for his new appointment as the City’s Public Works Director. He stated he looked forward to working with him in his new position. Councilmember McClung commented the fall cleanup day would be Saturday, October 2 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at Green Lights Recycling in Blaine. He encouraged all residents to participate in this event. Councilmember Scott congratulated David Swearingen for his new appointment as the City’s Public Works Director. Councilmember Scott reported last week a send off breakfast was held for 350 members of the National Guard who were deploying to Fort Riley Kansas. Councilmember Holmes congratulated David Swearingen for his new appointment as the City’s Public Works Director. Councilmember Holmes commented the City has been working with the Mounds View High School and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department to address parking and pedestrian safety. Councilmember Holmes thanked the Rotary Club for painting the hockey rink at Perry Park. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 11 Councilmember Holmes suggested the Council approve a Resolution that would set hours for City parks. She noted Ramsey County is discussing changes to their ordinances that would allow County parks to be open 24 hours a day. Mayor Grant explained he has received comments from several residents about opening Tony Schmidt Park 24 hours a day. He indicated after dark there were different things happening within the park and for this reason, he supported the City adopting a Resolution or sending a letter to Ramsey County voicing the City’s concerns. Council discussed and directed staff to begin preparing a letter. Mayor Grant congratulated David Swearingen on his new position with the City as the Public Works Director. He reported this year’s PMP went very well. He indicated this was a very well deserved promotion. Mayor Grant stated St. Paul Water Authority has removed the watering ban. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Scott seconded a motion to adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:17 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor CONSENT ITEM - 6A MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims and Payroll Listing Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: Claims and Payroll Listing All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact N/A Attachments 2021 Payroll #20 $104,766.50 Total Payroll $104,766.50 Paid Claims - 09/18/21 through 10/01/21 (Check Nos. 50353-50400 and ACH Checks)$384,172.55 Total Accounts Payable $384,172.55 Total Claims $488,939.05 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 20 CHECKS DATED: 10/01/21 Biweekly: 09/11/21 - 09/24/21 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,453.63 EFT SIT 2,813.38 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,053.56 EFT FICA Medicare 948.02 EFT TOTAL TAXES 14,268.59 Health Premium 1,536.26 A/P Check* Dental Premium 169.48 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1,705.74 HSA Health Saving 380.00 Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 4,570.12 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 442.46 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 465.80 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 5,858.38 PERA 3,936.55 EFT ICMA 2,333.70 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 750.00 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 7,634.65 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 1,225.12 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 16.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 42.09 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 8.40 A/P Check* UNUM 19.51 A/P Check* AFLAC 22.76 EFT TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,473.88 Total Employee Deductions 30,941.24 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 42,034.06 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 72,975.30 Plus City Paid Benefit 31,791.20 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 104,766.50 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 72,975.30 Less Total FSA 1,705.74 Less Total H.SA 5,858.38 Less Voluntary Ins 31.16 Net P/R Subject to FICA 65,380.02 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,053.56 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 948.02 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. CITY BENEFIT 4,053.56 948.02 5,001.58 19,510.12 587.40 20,097.52 1,625.00 1,625.00 4,542.16 421.74 4,963.90 103.20 103.20 Accounts Payable User: Printed: pang.silseth 10/1/2021 4:59 PM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0320 HEALTH PARTNERS INC 09/24/2021ACH 107296988 October Dental 730.53 730.53Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0327 STAPLES INC 09/24/2021ACH 3486674812 Supplies 13.49 3486674812 Supplies 104.98 3486925906 Supplies 119.70 3486925906 Supplies 16.99 3486925907 Supplies 6.09 3486925908 Supplies 174.49 435.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0339 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 09/24/2021ACH 0482929 Gate Valve-Cleveland Ave 4,004.72 4,004.72Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0339: 0706 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 09/24/2021ACH 7500382 Supplies-Gloves 68.88 68.88Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0706: 0731 MIDWAY FORD 09/24/2021ACH 475900 Equip #85441 Part 23.83 475900 Equip #85441 Part 10.21 34.04Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0731: 0750 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/24/2021ACH 9888170067 Service 9/11-10/10 976.64 976.64Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 0761 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 09/24/2021ACH 0071755-IN Lift #5 Flush Valve Kit 1,766.00 1,766.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0761: 0922 NINENORTH 09/24/2021ACH 2021-169 August Production 1,019.25 1,019.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 09/24/2021ACH M1341 CC Meeting Minutes-9/13 151.00 M1341 PC Meeting Minutes-9/8 342.50 493.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1252 CAMPBELL KNUTSON - ATTORNEYS AT LAW09/24/2021ACH 3231G-0821 August Legal 1,224.50 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 21-004 #556 244.90 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 19-002 #590 72.90 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 21-014 #569 306.40 3231G-0821 August Legal 661.50 3231G-0821 August Legal 77.50 3231G-0821 August Legal 62.00 3231G-0821 August Legal 325.50 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 21-011 #609 1,158.00 3231G-0821 August Legal 1,692.00 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 21-015 #582 196.80 3231G-0821 August Legal 31.00 3231G-0821 August Legal-PC 20-022 #549 360.55 6,413.55Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1252: 2479 GAMETIME 09/24/2021ACH PJI-0158409 Swing Seat 449.86 449.86Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2479: 5587 CES IMAGING INC 09/24/2021ACH INV131669 September Rental 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 1053 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY INC 09/24/202150353 6795 Crack Seal Streets/Trails 5,347.11 7180 Fog Seal Streets/Trails/Parking Lots 4,417.71 9,764.82Total for Check Number 50353: 10387 ATHLETIC OUTFITTERS 09/24/202150354 100282 Screenprinting-PW Clothing 68.75 70322 Screenprinting-PW Clothing 1,251.60 1,320.35Total for Check Number 50354: 7804 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO 09/24/202150355 210915 Black Dirt Purchase 9-1 58.32 58.32Total for Check Number 50355: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 09/24/202150356 498502 Supplies 175.97 499473 Supplies 43.98 219.95Total for Check Number 50356: CANA CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO 09/24/202150357 3000-2000160289 2021-2026 Basic Rent 100.00 100.00Total for Check Number 50357: 1033 COMCAST 09/24/202150358 44271.1021 Service 9/21-10/20 6.57 6.57Total for Check Number 50358: 10244 COMCAST BUSINESS INC 09/24/202150359 129867583 September Service 495.64 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 495.64Total for Check Number 50359: 1032 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO INC 09/24/202150360 210831 Asphalt Purchases 8/17-8/30 1,113.70 210831 Asphalt Purchases 8/17-8/30 3,679.87 210915 Asphlat Purchase 9/2 327.19 5,120.76Total for Check Number 50360: 5519 FLEETPRIDE 09/24/202150361 81052658 Supplies 4.55 4.55Total for Check Number 50361: 1380 GARY CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO 09/24/202150362 122250-2 Equipment Rental 41.00 41.00Total for Check Number 50362: 10218 HR GREEN INC 09/24/202150363 146709 RRA-August 6,248.00 146713 Gen Engineering-August 12,154.93 146713 Streets-August 1,532.00 146714 Engineering-Aug PC 21-019 #596 245.00 146716 Lex Station Phase 3-August 2,450.00 22,629.93Total for Check Number 50363: 5609 IDEAL SERVICE INC 09/24/202150364 11256 Booster Station Pump 1 260.00 260.00Total for Check Number 50364: 10452 INFRASTRCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICE09/24/202150365 50268-4 Pavement Condition Survey 2,075.40 2,075.40Total for Check Number 50365: MISC2 KENNETH OHNSTAD 09/24/202150366 9232021 Refund AARP Driver Safety 30.00 30.00Total for Check Number 50366: 0222 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/24/202150367 348182 Membership Dues 2021-2022 10,171.00 9012021 2021 Mayors Membership Dues 30.00 10,201.00Total for Check Number 50367: MISC1 MARLYS FRANK 09/24/202150368 9232021 Refund AARP Driver Safety 30.00 30.00Total for Check Number 50368: 10236 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE 09/24/202150369 90636 Mech Hoist Inspection 129.25 129.25Total for Check Number 50369: 10202 MURLOWSKI PROPERTIES INC 09/24/202150370 5514 Black Dirt Purchase 9-1 33.82 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 33.82Total for Check Number 50370: 10351 NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES LLC 09/24/202150371 39974 Karth Lake Runoff to 9/18 1,158.50 1,158.50Total for Check Number 50371: 0155 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES 09/24/202150372 W21080579 August Phones 750.32 750.32Total for Check Number 50372: 10408 PAULSON & CLARK ENGINEERING 09/24/202150373 21885 HVAC Project 2,324.17 2,324.17Total for Check Number 50373: 10250 PEAK STAFFING INC 09/24/202150374 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 742.50 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 101.25 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 135.00 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 135.00 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 101.25 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 101.25 47600 Office Support 9/6-9/10 33.75 1,350.00Total for Check Number 50374: 7038 PEARSON BROS INC 09/24/202150375 5423 2021 Seal Coat 47,070.68 47,070.68Total for Check Number 50375: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 09/24/202150376 FLEET-000660 Parts & Service-July 607.72 FLEET-000660 Parts & Service-July 2,289.60 PUBW-019329 2021 Road Striping/Centerline Painting 6,680.24 9,577.56Total for Check Number 50376: 6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 09/24/202150377 GL154938.1021 October Insurance 1,200.77 1,200.77Total for Check Number 50377: 6555 TKDA INC 09/24/202150378 2021000248 Trunk Watermain-January 860.13 2021002114 Trunk Watermain-May 1,937.85 2021003384 Trunk Watermain-July 482.30 2021003538 Arden Oaks -August 2,212.70 5,492.98Total for Check Number 50378: 1396 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY09/24/202150379 21-0830-62152 Bobcat Tow 500.00 500.00Total for Check Number 50379: 1161 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 09/24/202150380 29906 Sewer Main-Red Fox Rd 3,553.50 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 3,553.50Total for Check Number 50380: 9755 VERIZON CONNECT NWF INC 09/24/202150381 OSV000002540782 August Service 323.80 323.80Total for Check Number 50381: 142,276.35Total for 9/24/2021: 0192 GRAINGER INC 10/01/2021ACH 9063436241 Phase Monitor Relay Plugs 98.36 98.36Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0327 STAPLES INC 10/01/2021ACH 3487395928 Supplies 10.78 3487395928 Supplies 22.19 3487395929 Supplies 51.96 3487395930 Supplies 49.18 3487395931 Supplies 6.98 141.09Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 10/01/2021ACH PR 21-20 PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 365.51 PR 21-20 PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 421.74 787.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 10/01/2021ACH PR 21-20 PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,736.54 PR 21-20 PR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.10.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 231.65 1,968.19Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0469 PEMBER COMPANIES INC 10/01/2021ACH 12546 Hamline Crosswalk/Shorewood Drainage Pay 1 -2,811.18 12546 Hamline Crosswalk/Shorewood Drainage Pay 1 56,223.55 12546 Hamline Crosswalk/Shorewood Drainage Pay 1 -3,547.39 12546 Hamline Crosswalk/Shorewood Drainage Pay 1 70,947.60 120,812.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0469: 0549 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC INC 10/01/2021ACH 225886-001 Hoses 82.80 225896-001 Pin Lugs 43.06 125.86Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0549: 0761 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 10/01/2021ACH 71839-IN LS #8 Phase Monitor Replacement 726.50 726.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0761: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 10/01/2021ACH 275530 7/10-8/20/21 Planning Services 59.30 275530 Chick-Fil-A PC 21-011 #564 314.00 275530 Bethel/Bolton & Menk PC 21-016 #587 78.50 275530 Launch Properties PC 21-019 #596 424.00 275530 Planning and Zoning 6,770.00 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 275530 IMKD3 PC 21-004 #556 314.00 275530 7/10-8/20/21 Planning Services 177.90 275530 7/10-8/20/21 Planning Services 948.80 275530 MVPS PC 21-017 #593 78.50 275530 Arden Hills RE PC 20-022 #549 78.50 9,243.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1785 ECOENVELOPES LLC 10/01/2021ACH UB.1021 October 2021 UB Postage 296.66 UB.1021 October 2021 UB Postage 296.67 UB.1021 October 2021 UB Postage 296.67 890.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1785: 5493 JOLENE TRAUBA 10/01/2021ACH 9232021 Mileage Reimbursement 7/8-9/23 88.13 88.13Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5493: 7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 10/01/2021ACH 1197706 Restrooms 9/4-10/1 622.00 622.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025: 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 10/01/2021ACH 1221-5009 June Drinking Water Survey 728.75 1221-5010 July Drinking Water Survey 731.25 1221-5011 August Drinking Water Survey 785.00 2,245.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: ALPI ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 10/01/2021ACH 163921 Aug/Sept Newsletter 3,734.28 164094 Business Cards-BP 130.54 3,864.82Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: HANSJ JULIE HANSON 10/01/2021ACH 9242021 Expense Reimbursement 17.76 9272021 Mileage Reimbursement 9/2-9/24 82.88 100.64Total for this ACH Check for Vendor HANSJ: UB*00504 Michael Ahlm 10/01/202150382 Refund Check 010715-000, 1417 Indian Oaks Trail 98.79 98.79Total for Check Number 50382: UB*00511 Tyler Aldridge 10/01/202150383 Refund Check 011816-000, 1139 Hunters Court 16.57 16.57Total for Check Number 50383: CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 10/01/202150384 184503.0921 September Pension 1,228.80 1,228.80Total for Check Number 50384: UB*00509 Troy or Jessica Daniels 10/01/202150385 Refund Check 010038-000, 1261 Tiller Lane 9.26 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 9.26Total for Check Number 50385: UB*00506 Nicole & William Evanson 10/01/202150386 Refund Check 009673-000, 3191 Lake Johanna Boulevard 399.72 399.72Total for Check Number 50386: 4999 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC 10/01/202150387 28102792 Paint-Parks 233.94 6245135 Painting Supplies-Perry Park 625.80 859.74Total for Check Number 50387: UB*00512 Victoria Hopwood 10/01/202150388 Refund Check 012323-000, 4421 Arden View Court 122.89 122.89Total for Check Number 50388: UB*00503 Bernard Jones 10/01/202150389 Refund Check 000175-000, 1427 Indian Oaks Trail 16.30 16.30Total for Check Number 50389: 1055 KODIAK POWER SYSTEMS INC 10/01/202150390 KPS0813 LS #8 Service Call 326.95 326.95Total for Check Number 50390: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC10/01/202150391 819 2021 Reimb Equip: Rescue Boat 8,750.00 8,750.00Total for Check Number 50391: 10362 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 10/01/202150392 INV9157092 Service 9/25-10/24 & Q3 Usage 632.83 INV9157092 Service 9/25-10/24 & Q3 Usage 111.68 744.51Total for Check Number 50392: UB*00505 Kelsey Mclean 10/01/202150393 Refund Check 010916-000, 4367 Arden View Court 38.08 38.08Total for Check Number 50393: 5443 METRO PRODUCTS INC 10/01/202150394 161799 Supplies 110.58 161977 Supplies 57.13 167.71Total for Check Number 50394: UB*00507 Scott & Barbara Montgomery 10/01/202150395 Refund Check 011434-000, 4321 Arden View Court 192.49 192.49Total for Check Number 50395: 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 10/01/202150396 315800102021 October Insurance 48.00 48.00Total for Check Number 50396: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 10/01/202150397 FLEET-000663 Service & Parts-August 1,399.68 Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription FLEET-000663 Service & Parts-August 4,927.80 FLEET-000665 Fuel Purchases-August 2,756.54 9,084.02Total for Check Number 50397: 10469 RUM RIVER CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS10/01/202150398 407 June/July Inspections 78,006.03 78,006.03Total for Check Number 50398: UB*00508 Allison Werr 10/01/202150399 Refund Check 009046-000, 4518 Pleasant Drive 50.98 50.98Total for Check Number 50399: UB*00510 Doug Wild 10/01/202150400 Refund Check 002933-000, 3568 Ridgewood Court 21.44 21.44Total for Check Number 50400: 241,896.20Total for 10/1/2021: Report Total (74 checks): 384,172.55 Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2021 4:59 PM) Page 1 DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Additional Comp Time Hours for Union Employees Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • An additional sixteen hours of comp time for Union Employees to be used between December 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Discussion The City Council discussed providing the Union Employees, or the Public Works Maintenance Workers, an additional sixteen hours of comp time in recognition of their front-line employee status during the on-going COVID pandemic. These additional hours are to be used between December 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. Should an employee fail to use these hours they will lose them. The additional sixteen hours will not count towards their annual comp time cap of eighty hours. Following this approval, Finance will make the necessary adjustments in the payroll system. Budget Impact There is a possibility of an increase in overtime costs if the absence of an employee(s) on any given day causes another to incur additional hours. Attachment N/A CONSENT ITEM – 6B MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6C MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements – Payment No. 4 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $3,807,000 $3,419,567.10 PIR, Special Assessments Utility Funds Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Payment No. 4 for the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements Project to C&L Excavating in the amount of $340,958.66 All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion On April 12, 2021, City Council approved Resolution 2021-021 Awarding the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements construction contract to C&L Excavating, Inc. The project is approximately 90% complete with the utility improvements completed across the entirety of the project. Concrete curb and gutter and driveway aprons have been constructed, the base material of the road has been placed and the site is being prepared for final paving. Five percent of payment is being withheld from the work completed in accordance with the contract documents as retainage. Payment No. 4 is in the amount of $340,958.66, Bolton & Menk has provided a recommendation to accept Payment No. 4 (Attachment A). Staff recommends that Council approve Payment No. 4. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact Total Construction Expenses: Original Contract Amount: $2,704,412.10 Change Order No. 1: $ 4,200.00 Change Order No. 2: $ 2,450.00 Total: $2,711,062.10 Other Expenses: Engineering Design: $ 179,069.00 Construction Mgmt: $ 191,198.00 Gen Admin & Legal: $ 85,000.00 Finance & Interest: $ 60,000.00 Material Testing: $ 34,888.00 Const. Contingency: $ 158,350.00 $ 708,505.00 Attachments Attachment A: Bolton & Menk Letter of Recommendation Attachment B: Pay Request No. 4 H:\ARDH\T13122417\7_Construction\D_Pay Applications\Pay App 4_September 2021\2021-10-01 Pay Application No 4 Recommendation.docx October 1, 2021 Mr. David Swearingen, P.E. City of Arden Hills 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Pay Application No. 4 2021 PMP Street & Utility Improvements City of Arden Hills, Minnesota BMI Project No. T13.122417 Dear Mr. Swearingen: We are recommending approval of the enclosed Pay Application No. 4 and payment to C&L Excavating, Inc. Please request approval from the Mayor and Council at the October 11th Council Meeting. If approved, please sign the Pay Application, and return a copy to me. I will then forward the signed copy to C&L Excavating, Inc. for their records. Please call if you have any questions regarding this recommendation or the enclosed pay application. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Nick Amatuccio, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures 10/1/21 Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6D MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposal for Performing the Warranty Repair Inspection on the North Tower Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $900,000 $ 622,124.92 Water Utility Fund Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Proposal for Performing the Warranty Repair Inspection on the North Tower by Badger State Inspection, LLC in the amount of $14,000. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion On June 26, 2017, City Council contracted The Osseo Construction Co. LLC to perform the North Tower Rehabilitation project. The work included sandblasting and recoating of the interior and exterior of the tower along with some miscellaneous structural repairs. Final payment to the contractor was authorized by Council on October 14, 2019. On December 15, 2020, The Osseo Construction Co. LLC received the two-year warranty coatings inspection report with items that needed repair. The contractor has since completed those repairs. Attachment A, is the proposal from Badger State Inspections to perform the inspection of the warranty repairs in the amount of $14,000. Staff recommends approval of the proposal from Badger State Inspection, LLC. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact Contract amount 526,300.00$ Engineering 76,779.00 Other 5,045.92 Warranty inspection 14,000.00 Total project costs 622,124.92$ Attachments Attachment A: Proposal BADGER STATE INSPECTION, LLC Water Tower Specialist I Antenna, Evaluations, Inspection P.0. Box 157 Osseo, WI 54758 (715)-533-8686 September 28, 2021 Jeff Frid By E-mail Public Works Superintendent 1245 Highway 96 W. Arden Hills, MN 55112-5743 RE: Proposal for Performing the Warranty Repair Inspection on the North Tower Arden Hills, MN BSI No. WI 1640 Dear Mr. Frid; This letter is to confirm the above referenced project estimated costs to perform the inspection during warranty repairs include: Field Inspection Services Fixed Fee $12,000.00 WSB Contract Administration Fee not to exceed $2,000.00 Overall Project Fee $14,000.00 Please sign, date, and send this letter back to Badger State Inspection LLC. BSI will not proceed with work on this project until we receive a signed contract. If you have any questions, please call me at 715-533-8686. Please e-mail the signed proposals to kmulhern@badgerstateinspection.com _______________________________________ __________________ David Grant, Mayor City of Arden Hills, MN Date Sincerely, Badger State Inspection, LLC Kelly C. Mulhern C:\kcm\Proposals 2021\ WI 1640 Arden Hills N. Tower Warranty Inspection\9-28-2021 Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6E MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-017 – Mounds View Public Schools Planned Unit Development Amendment Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement with Mounds View Public Schools for Mounds View High School, based on the City Council approval Planning Case 21-017 on August 23, 2021. This items requires a simple majority. Background On August 23, 2021, the City Council approved a Planned Unit Development Amendment for Mounds View Public Schools at 1900 Lake Valentine Road. Planning Case 18-014 for a Planned Unit Development was approved on May 22, 2019 and subsequently amended on April 27, 2020, with Mounds View Public Schools for Mounds View High School. The amendment in April 2020 added 14 additional conditions to the existing Planned Unit Development to address existing traffic and pedestrian safety issues. The Applicant originally proposed two separate phases of traffic and pedestrian safety improvements for Lake Valentine Road. Phase 1 safety improvements were completed. Phase 2 traffic and pedestrian safety improvements were scheduled for construction in 2021 in order to allow the School District to acquire additional property from the State of Minnesota. The Applicant has been working with the State of Minnesota for nearly two years on purchasing property, but has been unsuccessful in obtaining an easement or acquisition of land. The current Page 2 of 2 schedule in the approved PUD does not allow the School District sufficient time for completion in 2021 due to design changes for realignment on school district land. The Applicant has requested the City Council consider an extension of the deadline to substantial completion by mid-August 2022. This extension requires a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City and the “Developer”. The City Attorney has prepared the Amended Agreement and the document has been reviewed and approved by the Applicant and staff (Attachment A). Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following motion language for this case. 1. Approval: Motion to approve the Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement for Mounds View Public Schools based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 21-017 on August 23, 2021. 2. Denial: Motion to deny the Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement for Mounds View Public Schools based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 21-017 on August 23, 2021: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 3. Table: Motion to table the Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement for Mounds View Public Schools based on the City Council approval of Planning Case 21-017 on August 23, 2021. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. Amended Development Agreement 1 217909v2 (reserved for recording information) SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL PC 21-017 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“PUD Amendment”) is dated ____________________, 2021, by and between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT (ISD 621), a Minnesota Independent School District (the “Developer”). RECITALS A. The City and Developer have executed a Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated September 9, 2019 and recorded October 30, 2019 as Ramsey County Document No. A04781067 (“Development Contract”). B. The City and Developer have executed an Amendment to Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated April 27, 2020 and recorded _______________, 2020 as 2 217909v2 Ramsey County Document No. A____________ (“Amendment”). Terms of the Amendment required the Developer to implement safety improvements on Lake Valentine Road in two phases, to address traffic and increased pedestrian crossings between the school building and the north parking lot which includes, but is not limited to, the installation of turn lanes and other access improvements, trail and sidewalk improvements, pedestrian signal, signage and stripping modifications, as well and drainage and utility improvements, to be completed in 2021 (“Improvements”). [Collectively the Development Contract and Amendment shall be referred to as “Contract”.] C. The Developer is the fee owner of the property situated in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, and legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Subject Property”). D. Pursuant paragraph 33.E. of the Development Contract, any requested amendments shall be approved by the City subject to the requirements of the Arden Hills City Code and Ordinances. E. Pursuant to paragraph 28.A. of the Development Contract, the Developer has requested an amendment to the Contract for an extension of time to complete the Improvements. F. Pursuant to City Code, a PUD Amendment may be approved by a simple majority of the City Council after public hearing and recommendation of the Planning Commission. The Developer shall follow the procedures and requirements of the Contract. This PUD Amendment shall be executed by the City and Developer/Owner, and recorded against the Subject Property. G. The City Council reviewed and approved the proposed PUD Amendment on August 23, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City approves the Developer’s request for a PUD Amendment to the Contract for an extension of time to September 2022 to complete the Improvements based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the August 23, 2021 Report to the City Council. 3 217909v2 2. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, all other conditions of the original Development Contract and Planned Unit Development and Amended Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 3. This PUD Amendment shall be binding on the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns and shall be recorded against the Subject Property in the office of the Ramsey County Recorder as promptly as possible after it has been executed by the parties. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 4 217909v2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this PUD Amendment to be executed this _____ day of ____________, 2021. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: ___________________________________________ David Grant, Mayor (SEAL) And __________________________________________ Dave Perrault City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2021, by David Grant and by Dave Perrault, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 5 217909v2 DEVELOPER: MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT (ISD 621), a Minnesota Independent School District By: __________________________________________ Bernice Humnick, Executive Director of Business Services STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2021, by Bernice Humnick, the Executive Director of Business Services of Mounds View School District (ISD 621), a Minnesota Independent School District, on its behalf. ______________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 6 217909v2 EXHIBIT “A” TO AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description That part of the Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 21, Township 30, Range 23, lying Southerly of the center line of County Road “F”, subject to rights of public in said County Road “F”. AND Northeast ¼ of Northwest ¼; and West 400 feet of Northwest ¼ of Northeast ¼ lying South of center line of County Road “F”, Section 28, Township 30, Range 23, subject to the rights acquired by the County of Ramsey for Highway purposes. [PIN 28.30.23.21.0002] That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of State Trunk Highway 100, now Interstate 694, and north of County Road F; which lies easterly of the following described land: From a point on the west line of said Section 21, distant 832.5 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, run northeasterly at an angle of 85 degrees 19’ with said west section line for 416.6 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 1 degree 00 minute curve (delta angle 14 degrees 12’) for 1420 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 111.7 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 90 degrees 00’ for 650 feet and there terminating. [PIN 21 .30.23.34.0005] ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ Page 1 of 17 PUBLIC HEARING – 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 21-019 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following: Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 21-019 an application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master, Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review for a project located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”). The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 9A. Background Launch Properties (“The Applicant”), on behalf of Aldi, is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. (“Subject Property”) and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. 1. Proposal and Use: The two sites are currently developed with one vacant industrial building and associated parking lot developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would adjust the Page 2 of 17 existing lot line to the east. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site with a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a national dental tenant (~ 2,800 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,500 square feet). 2. Previous City Council Review The City Council discussed this project at a Work Session on April 26, 2021. Minutes from the meetings are included in Attachment N. Plan Evaluation A PUD proposal shall identify any requested modifications from the applicable zoning requirements as well as the reasons why the modifications would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the underlying B-3 District. Modifications to these requirements may be granted by the City without a variance through the PUD process. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission on September 8, 2021. The memo to the Planning Commission on this case is provided in Attachment L. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment M. Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary and Final Plat A. Lot Line Adjustment and Planned Unit Development The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. In the B-3 zoning district, proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites shall use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. A PUD promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. The platting process is required to create new parcels of land or to adjust the boundary between two parcels unless otherwise exempted under the ordinance. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. The applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed project in further detail and where flexibility is being requested. A complete plan set has been submitted for the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, and Site Plan Review for both lots. Page 3 of 17 Existing Lot Configuration: Proposed Final Plat: The lot area requirements for the B-3 Zoning District are a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and 100 feet of lot width and 130 feet of lot depth. The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. Adjusted Lot Line Page 4 of 17 Lot 2 is a corner lot with road frontage along Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. A corner lot shall maintain front yard requirements for each street frontage (i.e. on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the shortest street lot line shall be the front lot line (i.e. Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the longest street lot line shall be a side lot line (i.e. Lexington Avenue). Setback requirements will be reviewed later in this report. B. Park Dedication Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Code (Public Use Dedications) states that the City may require as a condition of approval for a Planned Unit Development the dedication of land, or payment in lieu, and park improvement fees if it is determined the project will result in an increased demand for park land or improvements. In establishing the amount required the City is to take into consideration previous payments or dedications for park purposes. The two lots have been previously developed. The City Council in review of the application shall determine whether or not the proposed development will create an additional demand on park land. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review 1. District Provisions, B-3 Service Business District – Meets Requirements Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Commercial (COM) on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial The Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. The proposed site plan which was updated on September 21st following the Planning Commission meeting is shown below and is attached as Attachment E. Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 71,767 295 feet 250 feet Lot 2 37,132 250 feet – Lexington Avenue 139 feet – Grey Fox Road 139 to 151 feet – Lexington Avenue 250 feet – Grey Fox Road Page 5 of 17 The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Meets Requirements Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Meets Requirements Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 16% Flexibility Requested Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. Bank/Dental: 19.2 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 ft. Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 ft. – Grey Fox Road Flexibility Requested Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. Bank/Dental: 21.4 ft. Aldi: 30 ft. Meets Requirements Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 ft. (east) and 10 ft. (west) Flexibility Requested Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. Lot 1 – 71,767 sq. ft. Lot 2 - 37,132 sq. ft. Meets Requirements Maximum Building Height 35 ft. +/- 29 ft. Meets Requirements The proposed development seeks flexibility under the Master Planned Unit Development for the general district provision requirements. 2.Design Standards -Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A.Building Positioning –Flexibility Requested Page 6 of 17 Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E of the Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The Applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement. The front setback in the B-3 District is 50 feet from the property line. The proposed bank/dental clinic building will be 19.2 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. The Aldi building will be 74 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. As shown in the above table, the Applicant is seeking flexibility for both buildings on the setback requirements in the B-3 District. B.Exterior Materials –Flexibility Requested At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. Trim and other accent or decorative features may be metal, wood, split faced block, EIFS, or stucco. Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. The Applicant is proposing to construct the two buildings of similar materials and design features which is intended to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The proposed building elevations consist of masonry, cedar fiber cement panels and aluminum composite panels with metal coping. For the Aldi building, the Developer is proposing to use a product called Spec-Brik for the masonry material. Spec-Brik is said to be a concrete masonry unit that provides a brick like texture in colors that replicate a traditional clay brick. The masonry face will be 4’ wide by 8’ high and then 12’ wide by 8’ high on the cart wall only. Installation is similar to a brick and mortar process. The image to the right is from a different manufacturer that Aldi had noted in their original submission as Alternate No. 2. This manufacturer is no longer being requested as part of this review, but it is a comparable product to Spec-Brik. Staff is providing this as a general illustration of the difference between traditional brick and the proposed concrete masonry product. The Developer is seeking flexibility for approval of the masonry product for the Aldi building towards meeting the desired materials as brick masonry in combination with fiber cement boards and aluminum composite panels. The City Council should review whether or not these buildings materials would be considered acceptable in meeting the 75% threshold with desired materials on all four elevations. Additionally, the City Council is asked to provide comment on the extent of the aluminum composite panel in the building design. On the anchor building for Aldi, the use of aluminum panels ranges from 23% of the east elevation to 14% on the south elevation as a focal design element around the Aldi signage on the building facades. The non-primary facades consists of primarily masonry and cement panels of the total façade area. Image Source: Quik-Brik Page 7 of 17 The transparency requirements for businesses within the B-3 District have been considered in the development and the proposal will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to this standard on the south elevation with 11% of the façade being clear glazing. The figure below identifies the proposed building materials for Aldi. Page 8 of 17 With regards to the outparcel multi-tenant building design, the City Code requires that façade treatment shall be carried around all side. Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are reasonably visible to the general public. Plain flat walls shall not be permitted when viewable from the public right-of-way or public areas. In addition, Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The City Council should review the architectural design of outparcel building for four sided architecture and transparency requirements. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to the design standards for outparcel building to allow the use of Belden Brick in satisfaction of meeting the desired materials under brick masonry. The Applicant notes that the outparcel building will consist in the overall design of the building with use of 82% of preferred materials. Since the Planning Commission review, the outparcel building design has been revised and all four elevations meet or exceed the minimum 75% preferred building requirements, if consideration is given to the proposed masonry. In the original design for the outparcel building, the east elevation did not have any windows and the use of aluminum panels was a focal design element around tenant signage. During the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant indicated a willingness to consider adding spandrel glass to the Lexington Avenue elevation of the outparcel building. The Planning Commission did include as a recommended condition of approval that this elevation be redesigned to meet building and transparency requirements. The Applicant has revised the east elevation to include use of opaque spandrel glass for 29% of the wall area. Flexibility is requested for transparency requirements on percentage required and opacity. West Elevation East Elevation Page 9 of 17 The figure below identifies the proposed exterior materials for the outparcel building. Two renderings of the building facades for the proposed are provided as part of this report. A full plan set of building elevations for both buildings is included as Attachments F and G. C.Lighting – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires exterior lighting to be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. The proposed plan includes wall mounted lights around the building, and area lights on 25’ poles in the parking lot and drive aisles. The proposed lighting is consistent with the use and the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that identifies type of light fixture, design, and pole heights. As shown on the photometric plan there are two areas along the north and west property line around the Aldi building where lumen levels exceed 0.4 foot candles as measured at the property lines. The subject parcel is not adjacent to a residential property. As a condition of approval, all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. Details about the proposed lighting are found in Attachment I. D.Screening and Fencing – Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. The proposed trash enclosure is located on the north side of the Aldi building, and is proposed to be constructed on three sides using brick with cedar boards for the gates to match materials used on the building. The plans do not identify any rooftop mechanical equipment. Staff recommends including a requirement screening of any rooftop equipment be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets as a condition of approval. Page 10 of 17 E. Landscaping – Flexibility Requested Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires a minimum landscape lot area of 25 percent in the B-3 District. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of 16 percent. Since the Planning Commission review, the site layout has been adjusted slightly to allow for an additional 1,350 square feet of greenspace to be added to the site. In their narrative, the Applicant states the project will provide significant landscaped green space along Lexington Avenue at grade level. They’ve noted that there is currently virtually no green space on the property and the proposed development is nearly ¼ acre more landscaping than the existing site. The Applicant was originally proposing the addition of 27 trees throughout the site. Following the Planning Commission review, the Applicant has increased that number to 30 trees to be planted. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way of every 50 feet of public street frontage. The proposed development would be required to plant 14 trees along the Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road right-of-way’s. The Applicant was originally proposing to plant four trees due to utility easements and associated conflicts. This number has been increased to seven boulevard trees. Staff has confirmed the existing boulevard trees along Lexington Avenue will be removed as part of the road reconstruction project and disturbed areas will be restored with sod. A landscape plan is included as Attachment H. Section 1325.04, Subdivision 2, requires landscaping on lots used for drive-up windows to the minimum widths: Front Lot Line 20’ Side Lot Line 10’ Rear Lot Line 15’ The Applicant is requesting flexibility to these requirements. The drive-thru lane on the north side of the property will be located approximately 8’ from the north property line and 5’ from the east property line. F. Snow Storage Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant has updated their site plan to show two areas where snow will be stored onsite. Those areas are located in the northwest and southeast corners. They’ve indicated that having two dedicated areas for snow storage will result in minimal impact on the parking needs (i.e. tenants and employees), easier plowing of the snow for the contractor, and lessen the impact to one area of the site. The Applicant indicates that they’ve arranged with the contractor to melt or remove snow if there is snowfall of more than 60” in a season. During the concept plan discussion, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. The Applicant had indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. G. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Requested The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right- of-way of any public street and 5 feet from any side or rear property lines. Flexibility has been requested for the parking spaces on the south side of the development along Grey Fox Road and between parcels. The Applicant is proposing a 5 foot setback from the ROW on the east side of Page 11 of 17 the site access point along Grey Fox Road. Then site plan has been modified on the west side of the site access point (south of Aldi building) to pull the parking closer to the building and increase the setback to 9 feet. This revision allowed for additional greenspace in this area. Setbacks from internal lot lines are less of a concern since the site will operate with a shared agreement under the PUD. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Flexibility Requested Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. The following provisions would apply based on the proposed uses: x Retail Sales - one (1) parking space for each 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Business & Professional Offices - one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Clinics – one (1) for each doctor or dentist plus one (1) for each nurse, technician, or professional and one (1) for each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Other Business and Industry – one (1) space for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. The proposed plan would consist of a one-story 19,480 square foot grocery store, and a multi- tenant building with a 2,500 square foot bank and 2,800 square foot dental clinic. The Applicant was originally proposing 147 parking spaces total for the development, but has decreased the amount to 140 parking spaces. Again, this reduction in parking allowed for the landscaping area to be increased. The following table breaks down the off-street parking requirements based on the proposed uses. Based on the site information provided, the development would be required to establish 120 parking spaces. Access to the parking lot will be provided via a two-way entrance off Grey Fox Road. Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Grocery Store – x 1 space per 150 SF of retail gross floor area x 1 space per 1,000 SF of back room/cooler x 1 space per 250 SF of office 12,838 4,590 670 94 92 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,500 10 10 Dental Office – 1 space per dentist & technician, and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 2,800 16* 38 Site Total: 120 140 *The Applicant has noted in their site data that two (2) off-street parking spaces are being allocated in their parking counts towards staffing requirements for the dental clinic. That minimum number may need to be increased based on actual tenant staffing. Page 12 of 17 The Applicant has shown a smaller building square footage for the grocery store to be reflective of retail area only on the Site Data Plan Sheet C-010. Included in the submission was an Operations Plan which shows a variety of uses within the grocery store (i.e. retail, office, and storage). Each use is subject to minimum parking requirements in the Zoning Code and is reflected in the table above. With the changes made to the site layout, the Aldi’s site has two (2) less parking spaces than the minimum requirement. However, under the shared parking through the Master PUD the proposed development exceeds the minimum requirement by 20 spaces. I. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – Meets Requirements Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, P states new building construction shall include construction of a minimum of six (6) foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all right-of-way. There are currently no sidewalks along Lexington Avenue or Grey Fox Road. The Applicant is proposing a six (6) foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. This was modified from the Planning Commission review in order to meet ordinance requirements. The Planning Commission did included this item as a recommended condition for approval. The Applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue but notes that one is planned as part of the future Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. This would be consistent with the approval of the Lexington Station Phase 3 project. Staff has verified that the City and County will split the cost of new sidewalks 50/50. The City Council may consider as part of an approval motion adding a condition that states “The Developer shall construct a sidewalk from Lexington Avenue into the Subject Site. The Developer shall use best efforts to obtain approvals from Ramsey County to construct a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue should the County not proceed with their Lexington Avenue Improvements.” The Applicant is proposing a bicycle rack on the east side of the Aldi building. The proposed bike rack conforms to zoning requirements in Section 1325.05 Subd, 8, Q. J. Freestanding Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. The Applicant is proposing a shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site. On-premise signage is defined as “A sign whose message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On- premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties.” The Applicant would like to utilize this requirement as part of the Master Planned Unit Development approval. During the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant provided verbal confirmation that they would reduce the sign copy area to 100 square feet on the freestanding sign to meet Sign District 5 requirements. The proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16 feet in height. However, an updated rendering was not submitted in advance of the City Council review. Based on the plans as submitted, the Applicant is requesting flexibility for a total sign copy area of 108 square feet allocated between the three tenants as illustrated in Attachment F. Page 13 of 17 K.Wall Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed wall signs up to 80 square feet per elevation with public road frontage. The Applicant has shown one 75 square foot wall sign on the south (facing Grey Fox Road) and east (facing Lexington Avenue) on the Aldi’s building. The Aldi building would have a total copy area for wall signs of 150 square feet. Then the outparcel multi-tenant building will feature a wall sign for each tenant of 33 square feet located above their main entrances of the building on the west elevation (facing interior of site), a 14 square foot sign each on the east elevation (facing Lexington Avenue), and then one 33 square foot sign on their respective spaces on the north/south elevation. For a total of 160 square feet of wall signage on the outparcel building. All signage is noted to be internally lit. The signage plans are shown in Attachment F. L.Drive-Thru Facilities – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.04 of the Zoning Code lists special requirements for drive-up facilities. One of these requirements states no drive up facility shall be located within 1,320’ of another facility. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly north of the Subject Property. Section 1320.09 allows this requirement to be waived if the following conditions are met: A. The operation consists of one or more drive-up windows and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows. B. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such businesses using drive-up windows in said building or complex. Sign materials are noted to be consistent with building materials and will consist of brick and metal panels. Page 14 of 17 C. Only one building or architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows will be allowed in addition to one freestanding business using a drive-up window. D. The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the appearance and function of the complex or building. E. An architecturally unified complex may consist of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent of providing a unified appearance and function is not compromised. F. The applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the use will not interfere or reduce the safety of non-motorized movements, specifically pedestrian and bicyclists. During the concept review, the Applicant was originally proposing a coffee shop/food and beverage tenant for the northern endcap of the outparcel building. That triggered discussion on possible traffic congestion, shared parking, and sufficient space for drive-thru stacking. The tenant occupancy has changed as part of this review and the north unit will now be occupied by a bank. The Applicant has stated that the change in tenant will eliminate the concerns previously expressed. The proposal still includes a drive-up window for the bank on the north side of the building. The Applicant is not proposing any electronic devices (i.e. loud speakers or menu board) as part of this application. Customers accessing the bank drive-thru facility will go directly to the teller/bank window for transactions. The applicant is requesting flexibility from this requirement to allow the drive-thru component. M. Traffic Study and Site Circulation No new access is proposed as part of this review. The Applicant intends to utilize two of the existing accesses and remove two. Access 1 is a two-way entrance that will be located on Grey Fox Road in the same place as the existing. Access 2 is also existing and leads onto the alley on the western boundary of the site. It is anticipated that vehicles will primarily use Access 1 to access the site. The accesses located approx. 60 feet 400 feet west of Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road will be removed. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment J for summary section of report). The study reviewed existing operations within the area, evaluated traffic impacts to the roadway network, and recommended improvements to the proposed development site. It should be noted that this study was completed analyzing the trip generation between a grocery store, bank, and fast food restaurant with drive-thru facility. With the tenant change, the Applicant is not proposing to install the side street stop control at the site access due to the lessened site intensity between the bank and dental clinic uses which they’ve noted should prevent congestion in the parking areas. With the proposed retention of the western access onto the alley located on the adjacent site at 3728 Dunlap Street, the City Attorney has suggested that the Applicant provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement. This was a recommended condition included in the Planning Commission motion. During the concept review, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the site for access to the loading dock on the north side of the proposed Aldi building. The Applicant has provided as part of their submission plans illustrating vehicle movements and pedestrian routes. Those documents are included in the site plan exhibits. These plans were reviewed by the Fire Marshal and determined to be adequate for emergency service Page 15 of 17 access as presented. The City Engineer has also evaluated turning radius and determined the site functionality to be sufficient. 3. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Building Height 35 feet +/- 29 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 16.0% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Bank/Dental: 21.4 feet Aldi: 30 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 feet (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 feet (east) and 10 feet (west) Building Positioning At Front Setback = 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Parking Requirements 120 total stalls Flexibility requested under PUD with shared parking - 140 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 5 feet Building Façade 50% transparency at front Less than 50%, Varies between building Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Flexibility requested with proposed materials and varies between elevations. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk None along Lexington Avenue – Defers to project 6 foot – Grey Fox Road Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 108 square feet Wall Signage Sign District 5 Wall Signage on multiple elevations Page 16 of 17 Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and responses from the Applicant to the Engineering Comment Letter dated September 1, 2021. The City Engineer has confirmed that the vehicle internal tacking has been adjusted with no conflicts, driveway radii widened to remove inbound sidewalk encroachments, and driveway radii increased to remove outbound left turn sidewalk encroachments. The following comment will need further clarification from the Applicant: 1. Engineer to confirm outbound right turn has no sidewalk conflicts, or confirm that no outbound trucks will turn. Movement diagram should be updated for the record. The additional item above and the September 1, 2021 comment letter (Attachment K) shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal has reviewed the site layout and confirmed spacing would be sufficient for emergency vehicle access and movements. Public Notice and Comments Notice was republished in the Pioneer Press on September 30, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case from this notification. The City received in April during the concept review a comment which has been included as Attachment O. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Final Plat E. Site Plans F. Building Elevations and Signage G. Outparcel Materials Board H. Landscape Plan I. Photometric Plan J. Traffic Study K. Engineering Comment Letter L. Planning Commission Memo Page 17 of 17 M. Draft Planning Commission Minutes N. April 26, 2021 City Council Work Session Minutes O. Work Session Public Comment P. Public Hearing Presentation Attachment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ttachment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ttachment D 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DATA.DWGInc.SITE DATAC-010JMFJMFRJAC-010 SITE DATA---- ---- C-0101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICEPROJECT LOCATIONNSWELOCATION MAP0SCALE IN FEETSITE SUMMARYPROPOSED ZONING:EXISTING ZONING:SITE/LOT AREA:IMPERVIOUS AREA:GREENSPACEPROVIDED:PARKING REQUIREMENTSTOTAL: 112143PUD SETBACKSPROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION:3737 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.1133 GREY FOX ROADARDEN HILLS, MN 55126S27 / T30 / R23RAMSEY COUNTY1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUTARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS),DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONSISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ANDCOMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK.3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OFDETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR INCHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGNINTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TOMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEENMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TOAVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FORGENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THEKNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACEUTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION(1-800-252-1166).PROJECT GENERAL NOTESALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS PROJECTS SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY OFARDEN HILLS REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION,2018 EDITION, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN ANDWATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, ANDCURRENT VERSION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE UNLESS DIRECTEDOTHERWISE.HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUMOF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE RAMSEY COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988 (NAVD 88).RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATESFOR THIS PROJECT.THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN MAY 2021 BYKIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES.SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCEPROJECT DATUMTOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGEND EXISTINGWWETXXXXUT><IIIOEUEUTVGFBOPROPOSED>IIOEUEUTVG>>>>>>>>OHLUTLCIVIL SHEET INDEXLIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.OWNER TO PROVIDE 10 TRIPS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FOR STAKING PURPOSES.STAKING SHALL INCLUDE ANY COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING: GRIDLINES WITHOFFSETS, ROUGH GRADE STAKING, UTILITIES, CURB & GUTTER, LIGHT POLES, SIGNS,SIDEWALK. ANY ADDITIONAL SURVEY WORK NEEDED OR REQUIRED SHALL BE THECONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO EMPLOY AND PAY ISG, INC. CONTACT RYANANDERSON WITH ISG, INC. AT (952) 426-0699 FOR PRICING INFORMATION.CONSTRUCTION STAKINGCIVIL PLAN ABBREVIATIONS:$WWDFKPHQW( N.T.S.11TRENCH WIDTHPIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTHNOTES:REINFORCED CONCRETESTORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDINGNTS11TRENCH WIDTHPIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTHNOTES:NON-CONCRETESTORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDINGNTSRIM ELEVATION324NOTES:123414020MANHOLE OR CATCH BASINNTS'T'AAPLAN OF COVERTOP BARS NOT SHOWNSECTION A-ANOTES:4020 MANHOLE OR CATCHBASIN CONCRETE COVERNTSN.T.S.20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-020JMFJMFRJAC-020 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. TYPICALHYDRANT INSTALLATIONNTSNOTES:TYPICALGATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATIONNTSARDEN HILLSNOTE:PIPE BEDDINGWATER MAINNTSNOTES:PIPE BEDDINGSANITARY SEWERNTSHEAVY-DUTYSANITARY CLEANOUTNTSHEAVY DUTYSUBDRAIN CLEANOUTNTSAABBCATCH BASIN BLEEDER DRAINNTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-021JMFJMFRJAC-021 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0211133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.CONCRETE SIDEWALKNTSST160BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNTSSTANDARDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNTSHEAVY DUTY20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-022JMFJMFRJAC-022 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0221133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.REVERSE PITCHCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERNTS2NOTES:121CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERNTSB61820-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-023JMFJMFRJAC-023 SITE DETAILS---- ---- C-0231133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. N.T.S.9"9"#6 - 14" LONG REBAREACH WAY THROUGHPIPEPIPE BOLLARD USE 6"SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPEWITH TOP ROUNDED FILLEDW/ CONCRETE ANDPAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOWSLOPE TOP OFCONCRETE3'-8"SEE SIGN SCHEDULE FOR MOUNTING HEIGHT3'-0"4000 P.S.I. P.C.CONCRETE3"0" (N.T.S.)GROUND/PAVINGSURFACEPROVIDE SIGNAGEAS NOTED ONPLANS/SCHEDULEN.T.S.N.T.S.POLE MOUNTED RESERVED CURBSIDEPARKING SIGNS. SEE PLAN FORLOCATION AND TYPE (TYP)EX. PARKINGSTALL WIDTH (TYP)ENTIRE PARKINGSPACES TO BEPAINTED "ALDI BLUE"WITH WHITENUMBERS ANDLETTERS1234CURBSIDECURBSIDECURBSIDE CURBSIDEALDI BLUE CUSTOM COLOR:CCE COLORANT OZ 32 64 128 L1-BLUE - 63 1 1 R3-MAGENTA - 5 - 1 Y3-DEEP GOLD - 1 1 --ARIAL BOLD FONT SHALL BE USED FOR NUMBERS AND LETTERS-PAINT SHALL BE SEALMASTERS 'COLOR PAVE' OR 'LIQUID THERMOPLASTIC'TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT OR AS APPROVED BY ALDI CM. CONTACT ROCHESTERJET-BLACK, GARY ROSBROOK, 585-441-4125 FOR ORDERING.-a. COLOR PAVE SHALL BE USED FOR NEW PAVEMENT-b. LIQUID THERMOPLASTIC SHALL BE USED FOR OLDER PAVEMENT THAT HASBEEN SEALED WITH A COAL TAR SEALER.-SURFACE PREPARATION SHALL COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS.-SIGNS, NUMBERS AND WORDING TO BE PLACED CENTEREDPARKING SPACEAND SIGN NUMBERTO MATCH (TYP)60"NUMBERS(TYP)12"LETTERS(TYP)RESTRIPE PARKINGSPACE TO MATCHEXISTING COLORN.T.S.PARKING SURFACEACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNNTSACCESSIBLE PARKING AREANTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SITE DETAILSC-024JMFJMFRJAC-024 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C-0241133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>II>>>>PCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PCPCPCPCPCPCPCPC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C1-SWPPP.DWGInc.SITE EROSIONCONTROL PLANC-110JMFJMFRJAC-110 SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN---- ---- C-1101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIESDESCRIPTION UNITSQUANTITYEROSION CONTROL LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONPC101100 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C1-SWPPP NARRATIVE.DWGInc.SWPPP NOTESC-120JMFJMFRJAC-120 SWPPP NOTES---- ---- C-1201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.20-23946V7.0 ERDrawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Drawing Name:Designed By:Reviewed By:SWPPP NOTESC-120JMFJMFRJAC-120SWPPP NOTES RUNOFF FLOWDIRECTION OFSILT FENCENTSNOTES:CONCRETE WASHOUTNTSNOTES:CURB BOX FILTERINLET PROTECTIONNTSNOTES:ROUND FILTERINLET PROTECTIONNTS6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1"TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK ORSLASH MULCHMnDOT STANDARDSPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE VPERMEABLE GEOTEXTILEFABRIC BENEATH ROCK ORSLASH MULCH18" HIGH (MIN) CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZERUNOFF FROM LEAVING SITE EXTEND SILTFENCE FROM EITHER SIDE OF BERM AS NEEDEDSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITNTSNOTES:SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG STAKINGNTS20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C0-DETAILS.DWGInc.SWPPP DETAILSC-130JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-130 SWPPP DETAILS ---- ---- C-1301133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEXXXXXXXXXXXX OEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOOEOEOEOE60' ROW >>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 > > >>>GGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C2-EXIST.DWGInc.EXISTING SITE ANDREMOVALS PLANC-210JMFJMFRJAC-210 EXISTING SITE AND REMOVALS PLAN ---- ---- C-2101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.REMOVAL LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-SITE.DWGInc.SITE PLANC-310LFORJARJAC-310 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C-3101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION0SJHJOBM4JUF1MBO3FWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPO0SJHJOBM4JUF1MBO3FWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'78968143023652,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75978>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-SITE.DWGInc.SITE PLANC-310LFORJARJAC-310 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C-3101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION6QEBUFE4JUF1MBO4VCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT6QEBUFE4JUF1MBO4VCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'78968143023652,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75978>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-SITE.DWGInc.SITE PLANC-310LFORJARJAC-310 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C-3101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION6QEBUFE4JUF1MBO4VCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFTXJUIDIBOHFTJEFOUJGJFE6QEBUFE4JUF1MBO4VCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFTXJUIDIBOHFTJEFOUJGJFE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G OEOE OEOEOEOEE>>>>OEOEOEOOOOOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE>>>>>>OEOEOEOE>>>>>>>25.0025.00 FBOFBOFBBBBOBFBBBBOB>>>>>>FBOFBOOOEEEEEEOEOEOOEEEEEOEOEALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7UEUEUEUEUEUEUE IIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366FBOFBOFFBOFFBOFBOFFFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOBFBOBFBOOOFBOFBOFBOFFBBFBFBOFBFBBBOBFFII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-UTILITY.DWGInc.SITE UTILITY PLANC-320LFOLFORJAC-320 SITE UTILITY PLAN---- ---- C-3201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.UTILITY LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED>>>>>><IIII>IIGGOEOEUEUEUTUTUTVOHLUTLFBO STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE SCHEDULESTORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULESANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C3-UTILITY.DWGInc.UTILITY SCHEDULESC-321JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-321 UTILITY SCHEDULES ---- ---- C-3211133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G OE OEOE>OEOEOOOOOOOEOEOEOE>>OEOE>>25.00 FBOFBOFBBBOBOBBO>FBOBOBOOOOEOEEEEEEOOEOEEEALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FFFBOFBOFBOFFFFBOFBOFBOFBBFBOBFBOBBFBOFBOFBFBFBOFBBOFFII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X OEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEIUEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBO>>N00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 >>GGGGGG G G G G 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C4-SITE GRADING PLAN.DWGInc.SITE GRADING PLANC-410LFORJA/LFO/JMFRJAC-410 SITE GRADING PLAN---- ---- C-4101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.GRADING LEGENDGENERAL GRADING NOTES101100 X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 FBOFBBBBOBOOOFFBOFFFFBOFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFFFFFFBOFBBBOFBFBFBBFBOFBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'78968143023652,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75978X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 VEHICLE MOVEMENTS (IN)ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ISGInc.comCAD FILE NAMEInc.Arden Hills, MinnesotaALDI STORE #30ISG Project No. 20-23946September 16, 2021N1 OF 0REFERENCE SCALE1 INCH = FEET10 20 4020 X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 FBOFBOFBBBOBOOFBFFBOFFFBOFFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOBFBOFFFFFBOFBOOFBBFBBOBOBOFBFBOFBOFBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'78968143023652,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75978X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ISGInc.comCAD FILE NAMEInc.Arden Hills, MinnesotaALDI STORE #30ISG Project No. 20-23946September 16, 2021N2 OF 0REFERENCE SCALE1 INCH = FEET## ## ####VEHICLE MOVEMENTS (OUT) X OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.0025.00 FBOFBOFBBOOOBOFBOBOALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7181762014302366FFFFBOFBOFFBOFBOFBOFBBBFBOFBOFBBFBOFBFBBOBFBOBOFFBOFBFBBFBOX OEFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBOFBON00°39'31"W 250.0025.00 PEDESTRIAN ROUTESARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ISGInc.comCAD FILE NAMEInc.Arden Hills, MinnesotaALDI STORE #30ISG Project No. 20-23946August 9, 2021N1 OF 0REFERENCE SCALE1 INCH = FEET10 20 4020 0SJHJOBM4OPX4UPSBHF4JUF1MBOSFWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPO0SJHJOBM4OPX4UPSBHF4JUF1MBOSFWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPO ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG II2,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>X OE25.00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(4) SI(1) GI(1) SI(2) HJ(3) CK(6) RA(5) TT(1) TT(3) CK(2) CK(4) JB(2) SI(8) TB(3) TB(6) RA(13) HG(3) CK(3) HJ(2) JB(2) ST(3) HJ(7) HG(17) HJ(3) TB(8) TB(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(5) CK(5) TB(11) CK(3) TB(1) SI(23) RA(15) CK(1) SI(15) TB(2) CA(14) HG(3) ST(2) CA(2) RA(2) SI(2) RA(2) CA(2) RA(3) SI(1) MA(1) MA(1) GI(1) CA20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.SITE RESTORATION &PLANTING PLANC-510JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-510 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C-5101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE SUMMARY6QEBUFE4OPX4UPSBHF4JUF1MBOTVCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT6QEBUFE4OPX4UPSBHF4JUF1MBOTVCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT 19'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL22'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEELGRADE LINE - SEE CIVIL DWGS.A1A30618'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL0'-0"FIN. FLOOR3'-4" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY11'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY EQEQ9'-6"SIGN OPNG.7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.GRADE LINE - SEE CIVIL DWGS.TYP.21'-2" A.F.F.CENTER OF LOGO SIGNSD1A301B1A305D1A305D1A304D1A30619'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD0'-0"FIN. FLOORGRADE LINE - SEECIVIL DWGS.A1A30511'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD18'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUD14'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUDEQEQ0'-0"FIN. FLOOR28'-10" A.F.F.T.O. STEEL9'-6"SIGN OPNG.3'-4" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY19'-11" A.F.F.T.O. BLKG7'-11 5/8"SIGN OPNG.GRADE LINE - SEECIVIL DWGS.TYP.D1A302B1A304B1A303C1A305FLASHING ATSILL BEYOND11'-2" A.F.F.B.O. CANOPY FINISH22'-1 1/2" A.F.F.T.O. STEELD1A303@ BUILDINGWALL@ CARTWALLB1A30618'-8" A.F.F.T.O. MASONRY/STUDSIGNAGEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITY SQ. FT. PER SIGNTOTALSTOWER SIGN274.9 149.8TOTAL SIGNAGE 149.8SIGNAGE IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATEPERMIT SUBMITTALEXTERIOR MATERIALS TABLEFACADE MATERIALPERCENTAGE OFFACADENORTHMASONRY 71%CLEAR GLAZING 1%SPANDREL GLAZING 3%FIBER CEMENT BOARD 24%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL1%SOUTHMASONRY30%CLEAR GLAZING11%FIBER CEMENT BOARD 45%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL14%EASTMASONRY40%CLEAR GLAZING20%SPANDREL GLAZING4%FIBER CEMENT BOARD13%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL23%WESTMASONRY65%SPANDREL GLAZING3%FIBER CEMENT BOARD25%ALUMINUMCOMPOSITE PANEL7%Drawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Store #:20-0693AALDI Inc.Arden Hills, MNLexington Ave & Grey Fox RdArden Hills, MN Ramsey County10/28/20RHRDV7ERAs NotedXXIssued for Client Review 10/30/20Issued for Client Review 11/12/20Issued for Client Review 02/25/21Issued for Client Review 07/08/21Issued for Client Review 08/09/21Inc.PLOTTED: 8/9/2021 3:12 PMDate:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATEPROJECT LEADDATESeal SealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567893North ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4South ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1West ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"ExteriorElevationsCBCEE-3A2East ElevationSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"Attachment F ALDI-Prototype Color PalletDarkMasonry:Metal Coping:Nichiha Panels:Aluminum Sill:Upper Wall Fallback Options:Spec-Brik: Chesapeake BlendBelden Brick: Modular Ebony Black BlendAt High Roof &Canopy: SilverAt Brick: Musket GrayAt Nichiha Towers:CedarAt EIFS: GraniteAt Ribbed Nichiha:GraniteAt Standing Seam:ZincBright SilverCedarExterior Cladding:CedarBase Flashing: CedarLocking Metal Panel System:Lead CoteNichiha Ribbed Panels:Mother of PearlExterior Insulated Finish System(EIFS): Dover SkyAluminum Composite Panel:Bright Silver615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564585.742.2222 - www.apd.com8SGDWHG&RORU3DOOHW7REHXVHGIRU$OGL%XLOGLQJ7REHXVHGIRU2XWSDUFHO%XLOGLQJ8SGDWHG&RORU3DOOHW FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONFACTORY FINISH SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGSMOTOR GONG FACTORY FINISH SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGSHOSE BIB FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSRPZ DISCHARGE FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSGAS METER FACTORY FINISH SEE PLUMBING DWGSGLAZING KEYRE: DWG A602ALIGN KEYA: ALIGN NICHIHA PANEL JOINTS AND WINDOW MULLIONSB: ALIGN ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL JOINTS AND WINDOW MULLIONSC: ALIGN NICHIHA PANEL JOINTS, ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL JOINTS, AND WINDOW MULLIONSPREFINISHED ALUM. SILL FLASHINGA3 - BRIGHT SILVERA3a - PETERSEN ALUM # "CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE"SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ANODIZED ALUM. RE: DWG. A602MEMBRANE ROOFING GRAYTOP OF SLOPED ROOF, CANOPY ROOF, AND BACK OF RAISED ROOF PROJECTIONS - SEE SPECIFICATIONSAPPENDIX 'B'METAL SOFFIT PANELSA6 - SOLID PANELS - BRIGHT SILVERA6a - 1/2 VENTED PANELS - BRIGHT SILVERRE: DWG. A301-A304EXTERIOR PAINTPT-19 / CL-9RE: DWG. A603ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ANODIZED ALUMINUM RE: DWG. A602ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANEL BRIGHT SILVERPROVIDE PANEL JOINTS AS SHOWN - PROVIDE ONE PIECE TIGHT FIT EXTRUDED MOLDING INSTALLATIONSYSTEM WITH CENTER REVEAL TRIM BETWEEN PANELS AND J TRIM AT PANEL EDGES.BLRD-2PT-19 / CL-4RE: DWG A603BLRD-4RE: DWG A603GUARD RAIL TYPE "A" GALVANIZED STEELRE: DWG B2/A507GUARD RAIL TYPE "B" GALVANIZED STEELRE: DWG B2/A507BLRD-3 GALVANIZED RE: DWG A603DOCK LEVELER / SEAL AND BUMPERSLEVELER - FACTORY FINISH / SEAL ANDBUMPERS - FACTORY FINISH - BLACKPROVIDE BRICK BEHIND DOCK SEALMASONRY CONTROL JOINTMAX 20' OCOVERFLOW SCUPPER MATCH COPING ABOVERE: DWG A2/A507ARCHITECTURAL CAST STONE TANNERSTONE: AG-1 SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - MORTAR COLOR TO MATCH CAST STONEALDI TOWER SIGN BY SIGN VENDOR7'-11 1/8" w. x 9'-5 1/2" h.; VERIFY SIGN SIZE PRIOR TO FRAMING OPENINGSEE DETAIL C1/A504CRTB NATURAL RE: DWG A603 - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGSBASE BID - BRICK 'A'SPEC-BRICK CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER4Wx8Hx16L (12W @ CART WALL ONLY)CHESAPEAKE BLEND w/ HOLCIM "SMITH GRAY"MORTARMORTAR ALT: SOLOMON "85X DARKCHOCOLATE"CONTACT THE CONCRETE PRODUCTS GROUP AT 800-789-0872 FOR ORDERINGSEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFONICHIHA FIBER CEMENT EXTERIOR CLADDING VINTAGEWOOD 'CEDAR'PANELS SHALL EXTEND ONTO THE ROOF FOR THE FULL DEPTH OF THE BUMPOUT. CONTACT NICHIHA AT770-805-9466 FOR ORDERING. SEE SPEC FOR TRIM REQUIREMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFO. ALL INCLUDEDTRIM ('H', 'J', 'L', CORNER, ETC) TO MATCH FCPEXIT DISCHARGE LIGHT FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 8'-0" A.F.F.WALL SCONCE FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 14'-8" A.F.F.; RE: DWG. A111 FOR DIMENSIONSJUNCTION BOX WITH COVER FOR FUTURE CARDREADERMOUNT CENTERED @ 46" A.F.F., SEE ELEC DWGSUTILITY METERING & C.T. FACTORY FINISH SEE ELECTRICAL DWGSEXTERIOR WALL PACK FACTORY FINISHMAN DOORS - MOUNT @ 9'-0" A.F.F., BREAK ROOM WINDOW @ 10'-0" A.F.F.ALL OTHER LOCATIONS - MOUNT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.EXTERIOR DUPLEX RECEPTACLE FACTORY FINISHMOUNT @ 1'-6" A.F.F. IN 4" SQUARE J-BOXROOFTOP UNIT SCREENING SYSTEM ENVISOR BY CITYSCAPES SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNOT USEDEXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEKEYMATERIAL / MFG. COLOR / NO.NOTESKNOX BOX FACTORY FINISH CONFIRM TYPE AND LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE MARSHALAUTO DOOR SYSTEM & TRANSOM ANODIZED ALUMINUM RE. DWG A601 & A602ALDI LOGO SIGN BY SIGN VENDORSURFACE MOUNTED SIGN: 15'-2 1/2" W. X 5'-1" H.8" X 8" PRE-FINISHED ALUM GUTTER MATCH PREFINISHED METAL COPING8" X 8" PRE-FINISHED ALUM DOWNSPOUT MATCH PREFINISHED METAL COPING TERMINATE AT CONC. SPLASH BLOCKACP H/J TRIM / JOINT COVERTYPICAL AT EDGES AND BUTT JOINTS OF ACPNICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL BASE FLASHINGPETERSEN ALUMINUM - #'CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE'SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFOADDRESS IDENTIFICATIONADDRESS IDENTIFICATION CHARACTERS SHALLCONTRAST WITH THE BACKGROUNDEACH CHARACTER SHALL BE A MIN. OF 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MIN. STROKE WIDTH OF 1/2 INCHNICHIHA CONTROL JOINT WITH "H" CLIPEXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEKEYMATERIAL / MFG. COLOR / NO.NOTESPREFINISHED METAL COPINGA1- SILVER - AT HIGH ROOF & CANOPYA1a - PETERSEN ALUM - MUSKET GREY-AT BRICKA1b - PETERSEN ALUM - #'CEDAR 397C0290SPRAY CODE' - AT NICHIHA TOWERSSEE SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX 'B'NOT USEDNOT USEDDrawing No.Scale:Project No.Type:Date:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Store #:20-0693AALDI Inc.Arden Hills, MNLexington Ave & Grey Fox RdArden Hills, MN Ramsey County10/28/20RHRDV7ERAs NotedXXIssued for Client Review 11/12/20Issued for Client Review 02/25/21Issued for Client Review 07/08/21Issued for Client Review 08/09/21Issued for Client Review 10/01/21Inc.PLOTTED: 10/1/2021 1:42 PMDate:AIssued:PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATEPROJECT LEADDATESeal SealDATEPROJECT DESIGNER1Date:Revisions:BCDE23456789ExteriorElevations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hdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϲϮϮϲWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϭϲϬϴ^dKZ&ZKEdϭϰϰϴ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϭϯϬϳ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϳϮϯdKd>ϱϬϴϲ͘ϲWZEdK&dKd> ϴϮйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϭϮϵKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϮϬϳ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϳϵϰdKd>ϭϭϮϵ͘ϰϱWZEdK&dKd> ϭϴйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳ^Khd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϯϬϴWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< Ϯϭϰ^dKZ&ZKEdϮϲϬ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϳϰ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϰϲϲdKd>ϭϬϭϱWZEdK&dKd> ϳϴйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϮϰKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϱϭ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϮϭϭdKd>ϮϴϲWZEdK&dKd> ϮϮйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^ͲEKZd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZϭϯϯϮWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/<ϱϬϯ^dKZ&ZKEdϯϬϴ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϰϰϰ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/<ϬdKd>ϭϮϱϰWZEdK&dKd>ϵϰйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϯϮKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϰϲ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϬdKd>ϳϴWZEdK&dKd>ϲй5HYLVLRQ6XPPDU\2SDTXHVSDQGUHOVWRUHIURQWJOD]LQJKDVEHHQDGGHGWR(DVWIDoDGH%ODFN%ULFN0DVRQU\)LEHU&HPHQW3DQHODQG*UD\%ULFN0DVRQU\KDYHEHHQUHDUUDQJHGWRDFFRPPRGDWHDGGLWLRQDOVWRUHIURQWRQ(DVW)DoDGH%ODFN%ULFN0DVRQU\KDVEHHQDGGHGWR1RUWKIDoDGHLQOLHXRIJUD\EULFNPDVRQU\$OXPLQXP&RPSRVLWH3DQHOKDVEHHQPLQLPL]HGRQ6RXWKDQG:HVWIDoDGHV3UHFDVW&RQFUHWH%DVHKDVEHHQPLQLPL]HGDFURVVDOOIDoDGHVKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'dZE^WZEz>h>d/KE^Ͳ^Khd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZhWdKϭϮΖ ϳϵϬ^dKZ&ZKEdϮϲϬZd/KϯϯйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'dZE^WZEz>h>d/KE^ͲEKZd,&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZhWdKϭϮΖ ϴϬϲ^dKZ&ZKEdϯϬϴZd/Kϯϴй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hdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳt^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϴϯϰWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϰϱϮ^dKZ&ZKEdϱϳϯ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϯϰϯ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϬdKd>ϭϯϲϳWZEdK&dKd> ϳϱйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϮϮKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϰϱ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϯϵϵdKd>ϰϲϲWZEdK&dKd> ϮϱйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'ydZ/KZDdZ/>>h>d/KE^Ͳ^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>Z ϭϳϱϮWZ&ZZDdZ/>^;Z<ͲϭͿ><Z/< ϰϯϵ^dKZ&ZKEdϯϬϴ;&WͲϭͿtKKͲ>KK<&/ZDEdWE> ϰϰϳ;Z<ͲϮͿ'ZzZ/< ϮϱϳdKd>ϭϰϱϭWZEdK&dKd> ϴϯйKd,ZDdZ/>^WZ^dKEZd^ ϱϭKW/E'E^Zs/KKZ^ ϲϱ;WͲϭͿ'ZzDd>WE> ϭϴϰdKd>ϮϵϵWZEdK&dKd> ϭϳйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'dZE^WZEz>h>d/KE^Ͳt^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZhWdKϭϮΖ ϭϬϳϲ^dKZ&ZKEdϱϳϯZd/KϱϯйKhdWZ>Dh>d/dEEdh/>/E'dZE^WZEz>h>d/KE^Ͳ^d&DdZ/>^^Y&ddKd>t>>ZhWdKϭϮΖ ϭϬϴϬ;KWYh^WEZ>Ϳ^dKZ&ZKEd ϯϬϴZd/KϮϵй 3DJH$UGHQ+LOOV'HYHORSPHQW*UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH16RXWK:HVW0XOWL7HQDQW%XLOGLQJ3HUVSHFWLYH1RUWK:HVW0XOWL7HQDQW%XLOGLQJ3HUVSHFWLYH)XOO'HYHORSPHQW3HUVSHFWLYH'DWH,VVXHG $WWDFKPHQW* ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG 181762014302366II(1) UP2(1) UP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OE25.00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(2) RA(5) TB(5) TB(3) CK(2) TB(3) CK(3) JB(2) HJ(2) JB(3) TB(8) TB(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(5) CK(1) JB(2) UP(3) TB(7) HG(3) HJ(1) JB(2) ST(13) HG(11) CK(3) HJ(2) UP(2) RA(1) UP(1) UP2(1) UP(1) UP2(1) UP(1) TT(1) SI(1) SI(1) SI(1) GI(1) SI(2) RA(1) SI(1) GI(1) SI(1) GI(17) HJ(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(4) TB(14) HG(3) ST(3) CK(1) TT(4) TT(6) RA(6) RA20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.SITE RESTORATION &PLANTING PLANC-510JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-510 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C-5101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE SUMMARY0SJHJOBM4JUF3FTUPSBUJPO1MBOSFWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPODENTALDENTALDENTAL0SJHJOBM4JUF3FTUPSBUJPO1MBOSFWJFXFECZ1MBOOJOH$PNNJTTJPOAttachment H ALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'>>>>>>>>UEUEUEUE >>>>> > >>>>>>UEUEUEIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII GGGGGGGGGGGGGGUTUTUTUTUTGGG II2,802 SF2,362 SFTENANT 2TENANT 1FFE = 932.75FFE = 932.75>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>X OE25.00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(4) SI(1) GI(1) SI(2) HJ(3) CK(6) RA(5) TT(1) TT(3) CK(2) CK(4) JB(2) SI(8) TB(3) TB(6) RA(13) HG(3) CK(3) HJ(2) JB(2) ST(3) HJ(7) HG(17) HJ(3) TB(8) TB(3) CK(5) TB(5) RA(3) CK(5) RA(5) CK(5) TB(11) CK(3) TB(1) SI(23) RA(15) CK(1) SI(15) TB(2) CA(14) HG(3) ST(2) CA(2) RA(2) SI(2) RA(2) CA(2) RA(3) SI(1) MA(1) MA(1) GI(1) CA20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.SITE RESTORATION &PLANTING PLANC-510JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-510 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C-5101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.PLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE SUMMARY8SGDWHG6LWH5HVWRUDWLRQ3ODQVXEPLWWHGRQE\/DXQFK3URSHUWLHV8SGDWHG6LWH5HVWRUDWLRQ3ODQVXEPLWWHGRQE\/DXQFK3URSHUWLHV 20-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C5-LAND.DWGInc.LANDSCAPE DETAILS& NOTESC-520JMF/LFOJMF/LFO/RJARJAC-520 LANDSCAPE DETAILS & NOTES ---- ---- C-5201133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICELIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.ROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0CONIFER / EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0GENERAL PLANTING NOTESROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLCONTAINER DIA2X CONTAINER DIALANDSCAPE EDGING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0SHRUB PLANTING DETAILSCALE: 1" = 1'-0IRRIGATION NOTES6QEBUFE-BOETDBQF%FUBJMTTVCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT6QEBUFE-BOETDBQF%FUBJMTTVCNJUUFECZ-BVODI1SPQFSUJFT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X OEALDIBUILDING SQ. FT. = 19,209FFE = 932.60'2,500 SFBANKFFE = 932.752,800 SFDENTAL CLINIC7UTUTUTUTUT 1817620143023660.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.5 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.5 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.8 3.8 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.8 3.0 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.8 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 3.0 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.5 3.4 4.4 4.6 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.3 3.3 2.1 1.5 1.5 1.9 3.0 4.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.8 3.4 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.11.0 2.1 3.2 3.9 3.2 2.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.7 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.6 2.2 2.6 3.6 4.9 5.45.4 5.45.3 4.9 3.6 2.2 1.8 1.8 2.2 3.6 4.8 5.6 6.4 6.3 5.9 4.8 3.9 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.9 2.6 5.5 11.3 6.2 3.8 2.2 2.4 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.3 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.3 0.0 1.0 2.9 4.1 5.1 5.86.7 6.66.0 4.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.4 4.2 4.4 6.5 6.6 4.6 4.0 3.5 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.4 0.8 0.62.5 3.24.1 5.76.6 6.76.0 4.2 3.8 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.7 4.95.76.5 6.4 6.0 4.8 4.0 2.2 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.6 2.5 2.42.3 3.54.75.66.4 6.36.0 4.94.12.5 2.0 1.9 2.2 3.3 4.8 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.8 3.4 1.81.10.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.10.6 3.1 8.62.0 3.14.75.05.1 5.15.15.0 3.6 2.3 1.81.72.2 3.2 4.24.55.0 5.04.44.2 3.11.70.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.6 3.411.11.9 2.9 3.74.14.8 4.94.4 4.13.4 2.4 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.3 3.3 2.7 2.5 2.3 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.7 2.7 2.91.72.0 2.1 2.3 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.01.7 1.41.31.10.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.5 1.0 0.81.11.2 1.31.51.8 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.01.7 1.41.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.2 0.20.7 0.9 0.91.11.31.72.4 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.9 3.8 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.11.4 1.10.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.0 0.02.2 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.01.42.1 3.34.5 4.75.2 5.24.7 4.43.3 2.0 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.08.5 2.9 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.91.42.0 3.4 4.95.4 5.5 5.55.3 4.8 3.4 2.01.40.0 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.08.3 2.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.91.52.2 3.9 4.9 5.9 6.7 6.7 5.9 4.9 3.9 2.21.50.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.04.6 2.3 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.91.42.3 3.4 5.0 5.8 6.6 6.6 5.84.13.4 2.31.50.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.02.91.40.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 3.64.7 5.76.2 6.35.7 4.73.6 2.01.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.11.70.5 0.7 1.6 3.7 7.34.51.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.81.11.8 3.24.74.9 4.9 4.9 4.94.73.01.7 1.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.61.70.6 0.81.72.0 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.61.51.6 1.81.7 1.5 1.10.9 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.9 3.6 4.0 4.64.53.9 3.6 2.81.71.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.51.50.5 0.6 0.91.1 1.41.6 2.0 2.2 1.8 1.61.4 1.5 1.71.91.51.2 1.31.72.1 2.0 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.01.40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.31.71.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.71.1 1.4 1.5 1.51.8 1.8 1.91.5 1.41.61.41.2 1.2 1.2 1.21.4 1.5 1.51.31.1 1.10.9 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.91.11.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.01.11.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.81.71.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.35.320-23946V7.0 ERARDEN HILLS, MNALDI Inc. Store #: 30Drawing No.ISG Project No.Type:Drawn By:Project Name & Location:Drawing Name:Date:AIssued:1Date:Revisions:BCDE234567891Designed By:Reviewed By:MANAGING LOCATION:FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\23000 PROJ\23900-23999\23946 ALDI - ARDEN HILLS MN\23946 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\23946 C6-LIGHT.DWGInc.SITE LIGHTPHOTOMETRICS PLANC-610JMF/LFOJMFRJAC-610 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN---- ---- C-6101133 GREY FOX RDARDEN HILLS, MN 55112RAMSEY COUNTY7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVEINTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SUITE 550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425PHONE: 952.426.0699MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL OFFICE0SCALE IN FEET20 40LIC. NO.DATERYAN J. ANDERSONMM/DD/YYYY55938B.M. ELEVATION= 934.99SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/09/21NOTE:THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPENDUPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOESNOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT ANORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INMISINTERPRETATION.FOOTCANDLE LEGEND"L31" & "L34" LIGHT STYLE"L21" & "L21A" LIGHT STYLEN.T.S.1"L24" LIGHT STYLEMANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBERLIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULESTYLETYPELAMPS REMARKSProvide light fixtures as shown on Fixture Schedule. Substitutions shall have prior approval by the Project Engineer before bid date. Being listed as anacceptable Manufacturer in no way relieves the Contractors obligation to provide all equipment and features in accordance with these specifications.L21L21L21AL21AL21AL24L24L24L24L24L31L31L31L34L34L34Attachment I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Launch Properties 800 Lasalle Avenue, Suite 1610 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 JULY 2021 Attachment J Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ July 7, 2021 Jacob Rojer, P.E. Date License No. 56767 3 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Roadways ................................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 4 Background Growth and Committed Traffic........................................................................................... 5 Pedestrians And Bicycles ...................................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................... 6 Site Accesses and Assignment ............................................................................................................. 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 7 Opening Year (2023) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................ 7 Opening Year (2023) Build Conditions .................................................................................................. 8 Design Year (2040) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................... 9 Design Year (2040) Build Conditions ................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 4 INTRODUCTION Launch Properties is proposing a 19,209-square foot supermarket, an 1,850-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,550-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The site is currently industrial and manufacturing land uses. The existing site is an approximately 56,000-square foot, industrial use building. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed project location. All exhibits are included in Appendix A. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed development is located on the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The following intersections will be included in the traffic capacity analysis: x Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road x Grey Fox Road and Site Access 1 (East) x Grey Fox Road and Site Access 2 (West) The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1. EXISTING ROADWAYS Access to the development will be on Grey Fox Road. Following provides a detailed description of the surrounding roadways. Lexington Avenue (CSAH 51) is currently a north-south five-lane undivided County State Aid Highway (CSAH) with two lanes in each direction and a two way left turn lane, however in spring of 2022 construction is planned to convert the roadway to a four-lane divided roadway, these geometric changes will be incorporated into the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) models. The MnDOT Functional Classification System Map classifies Lexington Avenue as a Minor Arterial Roadway. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports an annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 21,300 vehicles per day (vpd) in 2019 on Lexington Avenue. The posted speed limit on Lexington Avenue is 40 miles per hour (mph). Grey Fox Road is a two-lane east-west roadway with one lane in each direction. Grey Fox Road is classified as a Local Road according to the MnDOT Functional Classification System Map. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the AADT on Grey Fox Road as 3,450 vpd in 2017. The current posted speed limit on Grey Fox Road is 30 mph. Exhibit 2 provides the future intersection geometry and intersection control for the study intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze the traffic operations at the study intersection, weekday peak period turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, June 17, 2021. Exhibit 3 provides a summary of the weekday AM and PM peak hour turning traffic volumes. The turning movement count data is provided in Appendix B. The network AM peak hour was determined to be 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM and the network PM peak hour was determined to be 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM. 5 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 The 2021 turning movement counts were compared to historic AADT on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road and 2018 turning movement counts in the area to determine if there are still variations in traffic volumes due to COVID-19. Overall, the 2021 turning movement counts were greater than historic AADT and the peak hour volumes were similar to the 2018 turning movement counts so an adjustment factor was not applied to the turning movement counts. BACKGROUND GROWTH AND COMMITTED TRAFFIC Historical AADT data provided by MnDOT’s Interactive Traffic Mapping Application and the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study conducted by SRF in February 2021 were reviewed to develop a background growth rate to forecast peak hour volumes at the study intersections for Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040). Based on historic growth rates and prior traffic study, a 0.5% annual growth rate was applied to the Existing (2021) traffic volumes to develop the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) turning movement volumes. In addition to background growth, the trips generated by the Phase 3 of the Lexington Station Development were added to study intersections, these trips were assigned as documented in the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study for all analysis scenarios. With the reconstruction of Lexington Avenue, the access approximately 500 feet south of the Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road, that serves Cub Foods and the strip mall to the south will be converted to a ¾ access. This would result in the eastbound left turning traffic destined to the north at the access to reroute to the Grey Fox Road & Lexington Avenue signal. The redistributed exiting volumes were taken from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) Traffic Study completed in April 2019 by Alliant Engineering; these redistributed trips were included at the study area intersections for all analysis scenarios. Exhibit 4 shows the Opening Year No-Build (2023) turning movement volumes and Exhibit 5 shows the Horizon Year No-Build (2040) turning movement volumes. PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES There is an existing trail on the east side of Lexington Avenue, on the west side of Lexington Avenue there is a sidewalk south of Grey Fox Road. There are marked crosswalks and pedestrian push-buttons on all approaches of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road. There are no sidewalks adjacent to the site on Grey Fox Road. With the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project that is scheduled to be constructed in 2022, pedestrian facilities will be improved. Additionally, the sidewalk west of Lexington Avenue will be extended to the north to Red Fox Road, providing pedestrian facilities on both sides of Lexington Avenue. An east-west sidewalk is proposed running east-west along the southern boundary of the proposed site (i.e. on the north side of Grey Fox Road) that would provide a pedestrian facility along Grey Fox Road. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIP GENERATION The trip-generating potential of the proposed development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the anticipated total trips generated by the site. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 6 The average rate for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 850 (Supermarket), ITE LUC 911 (Walk-in Bank), and ITE LUC 934 (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through) were used to calculate the trip generation potential of the site. Table 1 provides a summary of the number of trips anticipated to be generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, including internal capture reduction. As shown, the site is anticipated to generate 236 new trips during the AM peak hour (128 entering, 108 exiting) and 262 new trips during the PM peak hour (135 entering, 127 exiting). Table 1 – Site Trip Generation For this analysis, it was assumed that all site trips will be vehicle trips. To be conservative, it was assumed that all site trips would be new trips and no mode split reductions for trips via transit, bike or walking were used. SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION The site trips were distributed to the adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following global trip distribution was assumed for the development: x 50% to/from the north on Lexington Avenue x 40% to/from the south on Lexington Avenue x 10% to/from the west on Grey Fox Road The trip distribution for the site-generated traffic is shown in Exhibit 6. SITE ACCESSES AND ASSIGNMENT The site will include two (2) accesses. Access 1 will be located on Grey Fox Road, approximately 260 feet west of Lexington Avenue, in the same space as the existing access, with two egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 2 will be onto the alley on the western boundary of the site which also provides access to Grey Fox Road, with one egress lane and one ingress lane. vehicles are anticipated to primarily use Access 1 to access the site. Additionally, two of the existing accesses are proposed to be removed. The accesses located approximately 60 feet and 400 feet west of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road are proposed to be removed. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix C. The site trips were assigned to the study intersections as shown in Exhibit 7. Land Use Description Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Supermarket (LUC 850) 19,209 S.F. 1,774 41 25 66 72 74 146 Walk-in Bank (LUC 911) 1,850 S.F. 208 20 18 38 20 20 40 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through (LUC 934) 3,550 S.F. 1,320 67 65 132 43 33 76 Total Site Generated Trips (With Internal Capture Reduction) 3,302 128 108 236 135 127 262 7 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. Existing signal timings used in the analysis were provided by Ramsey County. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 2. The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is also shown in Table 2. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. Table 2 – Level of Service Information Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Description A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized) Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized) Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized) Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing were evaluated for each scenario. Due to the scheduled reconstruction of Lexington Avenue in 2022, the existing conditions were not analyzed. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows: x Opening Year (2023) No-Build x Opening Year (2023) Build x Design Year (2040) No-Build x Design Year (2040) Build OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the opening year. The analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 8 The two site accesses were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control. The intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road used the geometry and intersection control from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) project. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 4. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 3. Table 3 – Opening Year (2023) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 41.6 D 33.2 C 6.4 A 6.3 A WB 42.0 D 38.6 D 6.6 A NB 6.0 A 3.3 A 0.8 A SB 5.8 A 3.1 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.9 A 0.7 A 0.1 A 6.3 A WB 1.0 A 0.5 A 0.5 A NB 4.3 A - - 2.9 A SB 5.5 A 6.3 A 2.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.4 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 6.2 A WB - - 0.2 A 0.1 A NB 4.7 A 6.2 A 2.4 A SB 3.1 A 4.0 A 2.6 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 38.2 D 26.6 C 8.9 A 10.6 B WB 35.4 D 35.0 C 7.5 A NB 13.3 B 8.4 A 1.5 A SB 14.0 B 6.9 A 1.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.1 A 1.4 A 0.1 A 6.8 A WB 1.3 A 0.5 A 0.4 A NB 5.7 A 5.6 A 5.6 A SB 2.3 A 6.8 A 3.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.8 A 0.5 A 0.3 A 5.8 A WB 2.4 A 0.3 A 0.2 A NB 4.4 A 5.8 A 3.0 A SB 3.6 A 5.7 A 2.8 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM peak hour and in the PM peak hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD CONDITIONS Opening Year (2023) Build conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of the site traffic to the study intersections. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site trips in Exhibit 7 to the Opening Year (2023) No-Build turning movement volumes in Exhibit 4. The Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 8. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 4. 9 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 Table 4 – Opening Year (2023) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 38.5 D 31.9 C 6.9 A 8.6 A WB 40.6 D 35.1 D 6.1 A NB 8.0 A 4.6 A 1.0 A SB 6.6 A 5.1 A 1.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.4 A 0.4 A 0.1 A 6.7 A WB 1.1 A 1.0 A 0.4 A NB 5.9 A 5.0 A 4.4 A SB 6.6 A 6.7 A 3.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.9 A 0.2 A 1.1 A 6.4 A WB 1.7 A 0.6 A 0.2 A NB 4.2 A 2.7 A 2.8 A SB 4.9 A 6.4 A 2.7 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 36.2 D 23.2 C 10.0 A 13.7 B WB 29.4 C 11.3 B 6.5 A NB 17.1 B 10.7 B 1.8 A SB 15.8 B 12.6 B 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.5 A 2.6 A 0.1 A 16.1 C WB 1.7 A 1.3 A 0.5 A NB 6.7 A 16.1 C 13.4 B SB 11.7 B 6.9 A 9.6 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.1 A 0.6 A 0.2 A 5.3 A WB 1.0 A 0.8 A 0.5 A NB 4.9 A 5.3 A 3.3 A SB 4.1 A 4.6 A 2.9 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS A in the AM Peak Hour and LOS C or better in the PM Peak Hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the design year. The two site accesses were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 5. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 5. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 10 Table 5 – Design Year (2040) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 43.2 D 26.5 C 4.6 A 6.9 A WB 45.0 D 40.1 D 6.5 A NB 7.6 A 3.7 A 0.7 A SB 6.1 A 3.4 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.5 A 0.2 A 0.0 A 5.5 A WB 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.4 A NB 5.5 A - - 3.0 A SB 2.1 A 4.1 A 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.7 A 0.1 A 0.0 A 5.4 A WB - - 0.2 A 0.1 A NB 3.9 A 5.4 A 2.2 A SB 3.7 A 3.9 A 3.4 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 37.8 D 27.2 C 10.4 B 10.7 B WB 35.6 D 28.0 C 7.7 A NB 14.8 B 8.6 A 1.5 A SB 15.2 B 7.4 A 1.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.8 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 14.5 B WB 1.7 A 0.7 A 0.2 A NB 5.0 A 14.5 B 6.5 A SB - - 5.9 A 4.0 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.8 A 0.5 A 0.4 A 6.0 A WB 3.3 A 0.4 A 0.2 A NB 4.2 A 5.7 A 3.0 A SB 3.9 A 6.0 A 2.9 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM & PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD CONDITIONS The Design Year (2040) Build traffic volumes were developed from the addition of the Design Year (2040) No-Build volumes in Exhibit 5 and the Site Trips in Exhibit 7. Exhibit 9 shows the Design Year (2040) Build turning movement volumes. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 6. 11 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 Table 6 – Design Year (2040) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 40.6 D 30.2 C 6.7 A 8.1 A WB 37.1 D 29.0 C 6.8 A NB 7.8 A 4.7 A 1.0 A SB 6.8 A 5.0 A 1.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.7 A 0.4 A 0.2 A 6.9 A WB 1.1 A 1.0 A 0.4 A NB 4.7 A 6.4 A 4.1 A SB 6.9 A 4.4 A 3.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.3 A 0.3 A 0.1 A 6.1 A WB - - 0.6 A 0.3 A NB 4.0 A 6.1 A 2.0 A SB 4.3 A 3.4 A 2.8 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 35.4 D 25.3 C 11.1 B 13.9 B WB 32.7 C 22.5 C 7.1 A NB 17.0 B 11.6 B 2.3 A SB 16.0 B 12.8 B 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.6 A 2.6 A 0.7 A 14.6 B WB 1.6 A 1.4 A 0.5 A NB 7.4 A 14.6 B 13.7 B SB 14.5 B 8.9 A 7.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.0 A 0.7 A 0.4 A 5.9 A WB 1.4 A 0.9 A 1.1 A NB 4.3 A 3.8 A 3.2 A SB 5.0 A 5.9 A 2.9 A Based on the Design Year (2040) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM and PM peak hours. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D . All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Launch Properties is proposing a 19,209-square foot supermarket, an 1,850-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,550-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The site is anticipated to generate 236 new trips during the AM peak hour (128 entering, 108 exiting) and 262 new trips during the PM peak hour (135 entering, 127 exiting). Site access is proposed to include two (2) full accesses, one of the proposed accesses will all be located on Grey Fox Road 260 feet west of Lexington Avenue and the other will be located on Grey Fox Road at the alley that runs along the western boundary of the site. A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build, Opening Year (2023) Build, Design Year (2040) No-Build, and Design Year (2040) Build. In all four scenarios, the three study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. It is recommended to install side street stop control at the site access. No other geometric changes are required as a result of the development. APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ July 2021 A. Exhibits NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 1PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREAARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationStudy IntersectionsProposed Site Driveways/Study Intersections NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 2FUTURE GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROLARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProject Site LocationStudy IntersectionsExisting Signal ControlExisting Stop Control NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 3EXISTING (2021) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 4OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 5DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 6SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTIONARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationSite Traffic DistributionInbound Site TrafficOutbound Site Traffic NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 7PROJECT TRAFFICARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 8OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 9DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD PEAK HOUR VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) Z 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 ZHRGREEN.COM September 1, 2021 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Aldi Store #30 - Engineering Plan Review Comments Dear David, An engineering plan review has been performed on the Aldi plan set, dated July 16, 2021. A summary of the review comments follows: PLAN SHEETS C-010 – SITE DATA 1. Final plans need to be signed and dated C-022 – SITE DETAILS 2. HD Bit Pavement Detail a. The pavement section is the same as standard pavement section. Update detail to Heavy Duty section. 3. Loading Dock Pavement Section a. Identify the slope/grade of the compacted surface to the subdrain. C- 110 – SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4. Provide detail for perimeter control 5. Missing inlet protection on structure just north of construction entrance C - 130 – SWPPP DETAILS 6. Clarify max spacing note in silt fence detail C - 310 – SITE PLAN 7. Detail western driveway pavement connection 8. What is the sidewalk tying into? Show/add note at both the west and east sidewalk ends. 9. Provide ADA notes and details at driveway, crosswalk and disabled parking locations. 10. Proposed lot line is shown. Are shared access easements/agreements in place between the parcels? 11. Is fence constructable in location shown without encroaching on adjacent property? Attachment K David Swearingen September 1, 2021 2 C-320 – SITE UTILITY PLAN 12. Detail existing sanitary MH connection 13. Provide high and low point locations and site flow line arrows 14. Need additional information and details on the plans for the underground storm system 15. Light poles locations are shown within the storm drainage system. a. Pole bases appear to be in conflict with system – detail C-410 – SITE GRADING PLAN 16. Cannot read elevations on east end (as noted) Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Aldi plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2021 PC Agenda Item XX TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-019 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. & 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review Requested Action Launch Properties (“The Applicant”), on behalf of Aldi, is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. (“Subject Property”) and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The subject property is currently two lots with one building developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would adjust the existing lot line to the east. This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one 19,480 square foot grocery store and one 5,350 square foot dental/office building. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.48-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site with a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a national dental tenant (~ 2,800 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,500 square feet). The property would be subdivided into two lots. The Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had Attachment L some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary and Final Plat A. Lot Line Adjustment and Planned Unit Development The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. In the B-3 zoning district, proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites shall use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. A PUD promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. The platting process is required to create new parcels of land or to adjust the boundary between two parcels unless otherwise exempted under the ordinance. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. The applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed project in further detail and where flexibility is being requested. A complete plan set has been submitted for the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, and Site Plan Review for both lots. Existing Lot Configuration: Proposed Final Plat: Adjusted Lot Line The lot area requirements for the B-3 Zoning District are a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and 100 feet of lot width and 130 feet of lot depth. The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. Lot 2 is a corner lot with road frontage along Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. A corner lot shall maintain front yard requirements for each street frontage (i.e. on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the shortest street lot line shall be the front lot line (i.e. Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the longest street lot line shall be a side lot line (i.e. Lexington Avenue). Setback requirements will be reviewed later in this report. B. Park Dedication Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Code (Public Use Dedications) states that the City may require as a condition of approval for a Planned Unit Development the dedication of land, or payment in lieu, and park improvement fees if it is determined the project will result in an increased demand for park land or improvements. In establishing the amount required the City is to take into consideration previous payments or dedications for park purposes. The two lots have been previously developed. The Planning Commission may make a recommendation as to whether or not the proposed development will create an additional demand on park land. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. District Provisions (B-3 Service Business District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Commercial (COM) on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial The Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment E. The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 71,767 295 feet 250 feet Lot 2 37,132 250 feet – Lexington Avenue 139 feet – Grey Fox Road 139 to 151 feet – Lexington Avenue 250 feet – Grey Fox Road Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 15% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. Bank/Dental: 19.2 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 ft. Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 ft. – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. Bank/Dental: 21.4 ft. Aldi: 30 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 ft. (east) and 10 ft. (west) Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. Lot 1 – 71,767 sq. ft. Lot 2 - 37,132 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 ft. +/- 29 ft. The proposed development seeks flexibility under the Master Planned Unit Development for the general district provision requirements. 2. Design Standards -Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Building Positioning –Flexibility Requested Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E of the Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The Applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement. The front setback in the B-3 District is 50 feet from the property line. The proposed bank/dental clinic building will be 19.2 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. The Aldi building will be 74 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. As shown in the above table, the Applicant is seeking flexibility for both buildings on the setback requirements in the B-3 District. B. Exterior Materials –Flexibility Requested At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. Trim and other accent or decorative features may be metal, wood, split faced block, EIFS, or stucco. Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. The Applicant is proposing to construct the two buildings of similar materials and design features which is intended to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The proposed building elevations consist of brick masonry, cedar fiber cement panels and aluminum composite panels with metal coping. The Aldi building design has met the 75% threshold with desired materials on all four elevations. The Planning Commission should make a determination as to whether or not the extent of the aluminum composite panel is acceptable in the building design. On the anchor building for Aldi, the use of aluminum panels ranges from 23% of the east elevation to 14% on the south elevation as a focal design element around the Aldi signage on the building facades. The non-primary facades consists of primarily masonry and cement panels of the total façade area. The transparency requirements for businesses within the B-3 District have been considered in the development and the proposal will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to this standard on the south elevation with 11% of the façade being clear glazing. With regards to the outparcel multi-tenant building design, the City Code requires that façade treatment shall be carried around all side. Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are reasonably visible to the general public. Plain flat walls shall not be permitted when viewable from the public right-of-way or public areas. In addition, Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. The Planning Commission should review the architectural design of outparcel building for four sided architecture and transparency requirements. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to the design standards. The east elevation will not feature any windows and the use of aluminum panels is a focal design element around tenant signage. The Applicant notes that the outparcel building will consist in the overall design of the building with use of 76% of preferred materials. The north façade is the only elevation to exceed the minimum preferred building requirements at 90%. The south façade (Grey Fox Road) is 73%, the west façade (interior facing) is 72%, and the east façade (Lexington Avenue) is 70%. Two renderings of the building facades for the proposed are provided as part of this report. A full plan set of building elevations for both buildings is included as Attachment F. The figure below identifies the proposed building materials. C. Lighting –Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires exterior lighting to be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. The proposed plan includes wall mounted lights around the building, and area lights on 25’ poles in the parking lot and drive aisles. The proposed lighting is consistent with the use and the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that identifies type of light fixture, design, and pole heights. As shown on the photometric plan there are two areas along the north and west property line around the Aldi building where lumen levels exceed 0.4 foot candles as measured at the property lines. The subject parcel is not adjacent to a residential property. As a condition of approval, all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. Details about the proposed lighting are found in Attachment H. D. Screening and Fencing –Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. The proposed trash enclosure is located on the north side of the Aldi building, and is proposed to be constructed on three sides using brick with cedar boards for the gates to match materials used on the building. The plans do not identify any rooftop mechanical equipment. Staff recommends including a requirement screening of any rooftop equipment be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets as a condition of approval. E. Landscaping –Seeks Flexibility Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires a minimum landscape lot area of 25 percent in the B-3 District. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of 15 percent. In their narrative, the Applicant states the project will provide significant landscaped green space along Lexington Avenue at grade level. They’ve noted that there is currently virtually no green space on the property and the proposed development is nearly ¼ acre more landscaping than the existing site. The Applicant is also proposing the addition of 27 trees throughout the site. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way of every 50 feet of public street frontage. The proposed development would be required to plant 14 trees along the Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road right-of-way’s. The Applicant is proposing to plant four trees due to utility easements and associated conflicts. A landscape plan is included as Attachment G. Section 1325.04, Subdivision 2, requires landscaping on lots used for drive-up windows to the minimum widths: Front Lot Line 20’ Side Lot Line 10’ Rear Lot Line 15’ The Applicant is requesting flexibility to these requirements. The drive-thru lane on the north side of the property will be located approximately 8’ from the north property line and 5’ from the east property line. F. Snow Storage Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant is proposing to store snow in the northwest corner of the proposed site and has indicated that in scenarios of excessive snowfall that snow will be hauled away from the site. During the concept plan discussion, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. The Applicant had indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. G. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Requested The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right- of-way of any public street. Flexibility has been requested for the parking spaces on the south side of the development along Grey Fox Road. The Applicant is proposing a 5 foot setback from the ROW. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Meets Requirements Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. The following provisions would apply based on the proposed uses: x Retail Sales - one (1) parking space for each 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Business & Professional Offices - one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Clinics – one (1) for each doctor or dentist plus one (1) for each nurse, technician, or professional and one (1) for each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Other Business and Industry – one (1) space for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. The proposed plan would consist of a one-story 19,480 square foot grocery store, and a multi- tenant building with a 2,500 square foot bank and 2,800 square foot dental clinic. The Applicant is proposing 143 parking spaces total for the development. The following table breaks down the off-street parking requirements based on the proposed uses. Based on the site information provided, the development would be required to establish 120 parking spaces. Access to the parking lot will be provided via a two-way entrance off Grey Fox Road. Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Grocery Store - 1 space per 150 SF of retail gross floor area 12,838 86 94 (sum of 86+5+3) Grocery Store – 1 space per 1,000 SF of back room/cooler 4,590 5 Grocery Store – 1 space per 250 SF of office 670 3 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,500 10 10 Dental Office – 1 space per dentist & technician, and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 2,800 16* 39 The Applicant has shown a smaller building square footage for the grocery store to be reflective of retail area only on the Site Data Plan Sheet C-010. Included in the submission was an Operations Plan which shows a variety of uses within the grocery store (i.e. retail, office, and storage). Each use is subject to minimum parking requirements in the Zoning Code and is reflected in the table above. *The Applicant has noted in their site data that two (2) off-street parking spaces are being allocated in their parking counts towards staffing requirements for the dental clinic. That minimum number may need to be increased based on actual tenant staffing. I. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, P states new building construction shall include construction of a minimum of six (6) foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all right-of-way. There are currently no sidewalks along Lexington Avenue or Grey Fox Road. The applicant is proposing a five (5) foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. The applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue but notes that one is planned as part of the future Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. The Applicant is proposing a bicycle rack on the east side of the Aldi building. The proposed bike rack conforms to zoning requirements in Section 1325.05 Subd, 8, Q. J. Freestanding Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. The Applicant is proposing a shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site. On-premise signage is defined as “A sign whose message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On- premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties.” The Applicant would like to utilize this requirement as part of the Master Planned Unit Development approval. The proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16 feet in height and has a total sign copy area of 110 square feet allocated between the three tenants as illustrated in Attachment F. K. Wall Signs –Meets Requirements Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed wall signs up to 80 square feet. The Applicant has shown one 75 square foot wall sign on the south (facing Grey Fox Road) and east (facing Lexington Avenue) of the building. Then the outparcel multi-tenant building will feature a wall sign for each tenant of 33 square feet located above their main entrances of the building on the west elevation (facing interior of site), a 14 square foot sign each on the east elevation (facing Lexington Avenue), and then one 33 square foot sign on their respective spaces on the north/south elevation. All signage is noted to be internally lit. The signage plans are shown in Attachment F. L. Drive-Thru Facilities – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.04 of the Zoning Code lists special requirements for drive-up facilities. One of these requirements states no drive up facility shall be located within 1,320’ of another facility. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly north of the Subject Property. Section 1320.09 allows this requirement to be waived if the following conditions are met: Sign materials are noted to be consistent with building materials and will consist of brick and metal panels. A. The operation consists of one or more drive-up windows and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows. B. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such businesses using drive-up windows in said building or complex. C. Only one building or architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows will be allowed in addition to one freestanding business using a drive-up window. D. The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the appearance and function of the complex or building. E. An architecturally unified complex may consist of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent of providing a unified appearance and function is not compromised. F. The applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the use will not interfere or reduce the safety of non-motorized movements, specifically pedestrian and bicyclists. During the concept review, the Applicant was originally proposing a coffee shop/food and beverage tenant for the northern endcap of the outparcel building. That triggered discussion on possible traffic congestion, shared parking, and sufficient space for drive-thru stacking. The tenant occupancy has changed as part of this review and the north unit will now be occupied by a bank. The Applicant has stated that the change in tenant will eliminate the concerns previously expressed. The proposal still includes a drive-up window for the bank on the north side of the building. The Applicant is not proposing any electronic devices (i.e. loud speakers or menu board) as part of this application. Customers accessing the bank drive-thru facility will go directly to the teller/bank window for transactions. The applicant is requesting flexibility from this requirement to allow the drive-thru component. 2. Traffic Study and Site Circulation No new access is proposed as part of this review. The Applicant intends to utilize two of the existing accesses and remove two. Access 1 is a two-way entrance that will be located on Grey Fox Road in the same place as the existing. Access 2 is also existing and leads onto the alley on the western boundary of the site. It is anticipated that vehicles will primarily use Access 1 to access the site. The accesses located approx. 60 feet 400 feet west of Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road will be removed. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment I for summary section of report). The study reviewed existing operations within the area, evaluated traffic impacts to the roadway network, and recommended improvements to the proposed development site. It should be noted that this study was completed analyzing the trip generation between a grocery store, bank, and fast food restaurant with drive-thru facility. With the tenant change, the Applicant is not proposing to install the side street stop control at the site access due to the lessened site intensity between the bank and dental clinic uses which they’ve noted should prevent congestion in the parking areas. During the concept review, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the site for access to the loading dock on the north side of the proposed Aldi building. The Applicant has provided as part of their submission plans illustrating vehicle movements and pedestrian routes. Those documents are included in the site plan exhibits. These plans are being reviewed by the Fire Marshal to ensure adequate spacing has been provided. The City Engineer is also evaluating turning radius and may provide additional comment on site functionality. 3. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Maximum Building Height 35 feet +/- 29 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 15.0% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Bank/Dental: 21.4 feet Aldi: 30 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Bank/Dental: +/- 62 feet (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Aldi: 120 feet (east) and 10 feet (west) Building Positioning At Front Setback = 50 feet Bank/Dental: 19.2 feet – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 feet Grey Fox Road Aldi: 74 feet – Grey Fox Road Minimum Parking Requirements 120 total stalls 143 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 5 feet Building Façade 50% transparency at front <50%, Varies between building Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Seeking Flexibility to allow overall building design versus calculating per elevation. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk None along Lexington Avenue – Defers to project 5 foot – Grey Fox Road Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 110 square feet Wall Signage Sign District 5 Complies with Sign District 5 Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment J) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Fire Marshal The plans are currently being reviewed by the Fire Marshal. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master Plan Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, setbacks, building positioning, building façade, building materials, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Master Planned Unit Development request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. x Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the September 1, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of- way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. The sign copy area for the freestanding monument signs shall be allowed up to 110 square feet as requested under the approved plans. All other signage shall comply with Sign District 5 regulations. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master PUD Development Agreement. 23. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 24. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 25. The Property Owner shall provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement for use of the western access located on 3728 Dunlap Street. x Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. x Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 26, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 19, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 18, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Final Plat E. Site Plans F. Building Elevations and Signage G. Landscape Plan H. Photometric Plan I. Traffic Study J. Engineering Comment Letter DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 4 Acting Chair Wicklund summarized the comments that had been made by the Commission and stated he found it interesting that the neighbors had to approve a request for chicken keeping. He commented he would rather have residents follow the rules established by the City and not leave this up to the neighbors. He feared the proposed system would increase tension in neighborhoods. Acting Chair Wicklund opened the public hearing at 6:53 p.m. Acting Chair Wicklund invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Acting Chair Wicklund closed the public hearing at 6:54 p.m. Commissioner Jefferys agreed that the neighbor approval was an interesting concept. Acting Chair Wicklund questioned if this language should be removed from the Ordinance. Commissioner Jefferys supported the language remaining as is. Commissioner Weber stated he supported neighbors having input on the keeping of chickens. He explained he would not personally keep chickens, but would want to know if his neighbors were keeping chickens and drawing predators onto their property. Acting Chair Wicklund thanked staff for all of their work on this Planning Case. Commissioner Zimmerman moved and Commissioner Weber seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-022 for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to add ordinance language within Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals for requirements to allow chicken coops in residential districts including Municipal Code language as amended to Chapter 4 as presented in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). B. Planning Case 21-019; 3737 Lexington Avenue – Launch Properties – Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review – Public Hearing Senior Planner Jagoe stated the Applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.48-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site with a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a national dental tenant (~ 2,800 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,500 square feet). The property would be subdivided into two lots. Senior Planner Jagoe reported the Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking 4 Attachment M DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 5 lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master Plan Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, setbacks, building positioning, building façade, building materials, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Master Planned Unit Development request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue , based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 6 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT, and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the September 1, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of-way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. The sign copy area for the freestanding monument signs shall be allowed up to 110 square feet as requested under the approved plans. All other signage shall comply with Sign District 5 regulations. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 7 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master PUD Development Agreement. 23. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 24. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of the Development Agreement. 25. The property owner shall provide evidence of an updated ingress/egress easement for the proposed development or obtain an ingress/egress easement for use of the western access located on 3728 Dunlap Street prior to approval of the Development Agreement. Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Acting Chair Wicklund opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Jefferys reported there were a lot of requests for flexibility from the applicant and noted staff has recommended 25 conditions. She asked if the Commission would be approving all of the deviations from the City’s requirements if a motion for approval were made. Senior Planner Jagoe stated this would be the case with the conditions as drafted. Commissioner Subramanian thanked staff for the detailed report on this Planning Case. He discussed the location of the drive-thru and asked if the snow storage issue had been addressed. Senior Planner Jagoe deferred this question to the applicant. Dan Terwilliger, 2700 West 44th Street in Minneapolis, described where snow would be stored on the site. He noted there would not be any issues for the cars exiting the drive-thru. Commissioner Weber stated this was a complex request. He questioned if there were any façade deficiencies for the elevations facing Lexington Avenue. Senior Planner Jagoe explained the out parcel building facing Lexington Avenue and noted flexibility had been requested. DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 8 Commissioner Weber commented on the Walgreens building and how it was oriented on the site. He questioned if the City was paying for the new sidewalk in the County right of way along Lexington Avenue. Senior Planner Jagoe stated she did not know the answer to this question. Acting Chair Wicklund requested further information on why businesses were orienting their buildings to the parking lot versus the main street of Lexington Avenue. Mr. Terwilliger reported tenants today want their storefront entrance as patrons walk in with parking up front. He stated this creates an easily walkable development. He explained if the front of the building were to face Lexington Avenue, patrons would have to walk around to another side of the building in order to access the front doors. Commissioner Weber stated this was reasonable, but noted the placement of the outlot building was also a concern to him. Commissioner Zimmerman discussed how it was sometimes difficult to place a building on a site in order to meet all of the City’s design standards. For this reason, flexibility can be offered in order to find middle ground where the City’s requirements and the developers standards mesh. He appreciated how the developer had tried to make this development as close to the City’s requirements as possible. Commissioner Subramanian questioned when construction would begin for this project. Mr. Terwilliger explained they would plan to begin demolition this fall with construction beginning next spring. Commissioner Jefferys stated she would like to have a better understanding why so many deviations from the City’s requirements was being requested. Ryan Anderson, ISG Civil Engineering, discussed the building placement in detail with the Commission. He explained the City required a 50 foot setback along Lexington Avenue, with the building required to be built at the 50 foot setback. He commented a 20 foot parking setback was also in place. He described how these requirements led him to the proposed building placement in order to create a destination for patrons. Acting Chair Wicklund requested further information regarding the landscaping flexibility. Senior Planner Jagoe reported the applicant was proposing to have 15% lot area coverage with landscaping when 25% was required by the City. She noted 14 trees were required within the development along the ROW and the applicant was proposing to plant four along the public street frontages. Mr. Anderson explained this was a tight site and was being retrofitted as it was now 100% impervious. He believed that he was bettering the situation by reducing this number to 85%. He understood he was short of meeting City Code, but noted 15% was in line with other communities for commercial developments. He was of the opinion 25% was a great deal of DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 9 greenspace for a commercial property. He commented further on the parking and screening that would be in place. Acting Chair Wicklund requested further information from the applicant regarding the flexibility that was requested for the free standing signs and pedestrian/bicycle circulation. Mr. Anderson stated sidewalks would be provided on both frontages (Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road). He noted the County was part of this project and would provide a new sidewalk along Lexington Avenue. He then discussed the free standing signs that would be installed on the property. He explained City Code allows 100 square feet of signs and he was requesting 110 square feet between the three tenants, which was how the architecture of the signs fell. Mr. Anderson commented that they would review the site plan to adjust the sidewalk width along Grey Fox Road and reduce the freestanding sign area to meet ordinance requirements. Acting Chair Wicklund requested further comment on the flexibility that was requested for the wall signs and drive-thru facilities. Mr. Anderson commented with double frontages it was ideal to have visibility from both sides of the building. For this reason, signs were requested for the building facades that faced Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. He believed this helped with driver safety as well. He discussed the code requirements for drive-thrus in Arden Hills and noted the proposed drive-thru was not further than 1,320 feet from another drive-thru, which then required flexibility. He explained that the world was changing due to COVID and more businesses were in need of drive- thrus. Acting Chair Wicklund reported drive-thru flexibility has been offered by the City in the past for Dunn Brothers, the Goodwill, Jimmy John’s and Caribou. Commissioner Jefferys requested further information from the applicant regarding the building material flexibility. Mr. Anderson discussed the building materials that would be used for the Aldi building. He noted the upper story windows would provide natural light and transparency into the building. He reported the back of the building would be used for storage and coolers. He requested flexibility and that windows not be required along this elevation. He explained the building had been modified from the typical prototype to fit the site and the City’s requirements. Chad Haller, 10K Architecture representative, commented on the building materials that would be used on the out parcel building. He explained one elevation of the building would have store rooms and visible glass would create a long-term challenge. He discussed how the building materials were varied along this elevation to create interest. He indicated spandrel glass could be considered to assist him with meeting the City’s requirements. Councilmember Holmes commented on the spandrel glass that was used on the Goodwill. She encouraged the developer to consider using spandrel glass for the elevation facing Lexington Avenue. DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 10 Acting Chair Wicklund explained the Commission has voiced concern as to what the elevation would look like along Lexington Avenue and encouraged the applicant to take this feedback into consideration prior to this request being considered by the City Council. Commissioner Jefferys requested further information regarding the off street parking setback flexibility. She questioned if the City had other parking lots with this same setback variance. Senior Planner Jagoe stated she did not have enough history with the City to know that information. Mr. Anderson reported this setback was requested to meet the City’s parking requirements. Commissioner Subramanian indicated the City requires 120 parking spaces and the applicant was proposing to have 143 total parking spaces. He questioned if the minimum landscape area could be met given the fact the applicant would be overparking the site. Mr. Anderson commented parking was a concern for the City Council and for this reason the site was over parked. He indicated he would consider adding more landscaping if this was the direction the City would like to move in. Commissioner Subramanian stated he would like to see this pursued further with the developer. Commissioner Weber discussed the large amount of greenspace that would be provided along Lexington Avenue. He indicated he was not concerned by the landscaping percentage. Acting Chair Wicklund opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Acting Chair Wicklund invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Acting Chair Wicklund closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Commissioner Zimmerman moved and Commissioner Subramanian seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021, report to the Planning Commission including conditions 24 and 25 as presented: 24. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 25. The Property Owner shall provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement for use of the western access located on 3728 Dunlap Street. Commissioner Jefferys asked if this would be a time to note the applicants were willing to address several items and would be making changes. DraftARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 11 Acting Chair Wicklund indicated this would be included in the notes that were passed along to the City Council. Councilmember Holmes stated she would appreciate the Commission summarizing the comments from the applicant. Acting Chair Wicklund explained the concerns would be included in the minutes. Councilmember Holmes indicated she would like this information summarized within the motion. Commissioner Jefferys moved and Commissioner Weber seconded a motion to amend the original motion adding the following conditions: that the Applicant change the pedestrian and bicycle circulation to go from a five foot sidewalk to a six foot sidewalk, the Applicant should consider reconfiguring site layout for ratio of landscaping to number of parking spaces, the Applicant is to review the outparcel Lexington Avenue elevation to meet transparency requirements, and the free standing sign copy area should meet City Code as agreed upon by the Applicant. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried unanimously (5-0). A roll call vote was taken. The amended motion carried unanimously (5-0). C. Planning Case 21-021; 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue – Minor Subdivision – Public Hearing This item was removed from the agenda. D. Planning Case 21-020; 2 Pine Tree Drive – Bethel University – PUD Amendment – Public Hearing Senior Planner Jagoe stated in 2013, Bethel University acquired the Country Financial facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive. The subject property is located within the B-2 General Business District, where higher educational uses are permitted by Conditional Use Permit (CUP). At its November 25, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a CUP for Bethel University to use the existing facility as higher education. The campus is referenced as their “Anderson Center” location. The approx. 227,000 square foot multi-tenant building is a mixture of higher education and office/commercial uses. Senior Planner Jagoe explained the property was subdivided in 2020 and split into three lots and Outlot A to be used for utilities and access drive within the plat. Bethel University retained their parcel with existing development and Outlot A. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in January 2021 for New Perspective Senior Living to be developed on Lot 1. Lot 2 was sold to the Lake Johanna Fire Department and is currently undeveloped. Bethel University has an existing multitenant freestanding sign that is located along Pine Tree Drive on Lot 2. They are planning to move the multi-tenant freestanding sign to Outlot A which is owned by Bethel University. With this relocation, the Applicant is planning upgrades to the freestanding sign design and size. Approved: May 10, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION APRIL 26, 2021 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Special Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Note: On March 20th, 2020 the Mayor signed a determination allowing Councilmembers to participate in City Council meetings via telephone pursuant to State Statute 13D.021 Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and Steve Scott Absent: Councilmember Dave McClung (excused) Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; City Clerk Julie Hanson and Planning Consultant Jane Kansier, Bolton & Menk 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Concept Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue – Launch Properties Planning Consultant Kansier stated Launch Properties, in association with Aldi, (“Applicant”) has submitted an application for Concept Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.5-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to raze the building and redevelop the site with a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a quick serve restaurant (~ 3,500 square feet) and bank (~1,800 square feet). The property is currently zoned B-3 (Service Business District), which permits retail sales and service uses. Planning Consultant Kansier reported the Subject Property is guided as Commercial (COM) in the Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Chapter. The area is designated for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. A development intensity of up to 0.8 FAR may be allowed. According to the Comprehensive Plan the total area of the COM is 26 acres. $77$&+0(171 Attachment N ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 2 Planning Consultant Kansier explained the proposed lot is within the Red Fox/Grey Fox/Lexington Avenue Business Area which is discussed in the Land Use Chapter. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950’s and 1970’s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment. Planning Consultant Kansier commented the Property is currently owned by STORE Capitol. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. The Applicant is proposing to develop the parcel as a new +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a quick serve restaurant (~ 3,500 square feet) and bank (~1,800 square feet). The proposed development is planned for construction 2021-2022. The Aldi building is proposed to be located in the northwest corner of the site, with the supporting restaurant and bank in the northeast corner. The Subject Property includes one access point off of Grey Fox Road. Staff commented further on the proposal and requested comment from the Council. Dan Terwilliger, Director of Development at Launch Properties, introduced himself and his team to the Council. He stated a year ago he began working with staff on this project. He reported Launch Properties completes retail projects all over the metro area. He discussed how exciting this project was as it would redevelop an industrial property that was located in a retail pocket. Ryan Anderson, ISG, explained he was an architect speaking on behalf of Aldi. He indicated Aldi was a 20,000 square foot grocer that has been adding stores in the metro area. He noted Aldi builds steel buildings with full brick that would meet City Code. He estimated Aldi would need 95 parking stalls. He understood this was a tight site, but Aldi was comfortable with the proposed concept plan. He reported Aldi would receive one, maybe two truck deliveries per day. He commented further on the landscaping plan and how the plantings would improve the property. Councilmember Scott stated he was confused to which side of the lot was the front lot line. Councilmember Holden agreed this was confusing. Planning Consultant Kansier stated she would have to investigate this further. Mayor Grant questioned why the applicant was only proposing to cover 14% of the lot with landscaping when 25% was the City’s requirement. Mr. Anderson reported the existing site was currently 5% landscaped. He discussed how he had maximized the site in order to meet the needs of Aldi, the required parking and had improved the green space. He reiterated that this was a tight space. Mayor Grant asked if Mr. Anderson had more information to present to the Council. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 3 Mr. Anderson reported he reviewed the site plan in further detail and commented on the encroachment on the east side of the property. He stated he wants to work with the City to enhance this corner of the property. He indicated he has been talking with Bank of America and a national coffee/bakery group about collocating on this site. He commented further on the project and requested feedback from the Council on how to proceed. Councilmember Holden stated this was a tight site. She requested further information regarding the drive through. Mr. Anderson explained the bank was not requesting a drive through. He noted the drive through would only serve the national coffee/bakery group on the northern half of the building. He estimated the drive through would have stacking for 10 cars. Mayor Grant reported Bank of America was a national bank chain that had four other sites in the metro area. He discussed how the developer had maximized the amount of development on the site, which was reflected in the reduced level of parking. He indicated he would have some difficulty getting over this. He stated City Code required 196 stalls for this site and the developer was proposing 138. Councilmember Holden questioned how snow removal would be managed on this property. Mr. Anderson stated no retail operation, especially national vendors, would move forward with a project if they were not comfortable with the level of parking. He reported Aldi does not open until 9:00 a.m. He was of the opinion the coffee shop would have an AM peak while Aldi would have a PM peak, noting these uses complimented each other nicely. He discussed how snow could be removed, trucked off and hauled away during the winter months. Councilmember Holmes commented on how grocery stores were limiting their level of parking to maximize the money made per square foot. She noted there was a concern in the metro area with the reduced level of parking at grocery stores in the metro area. She explained that the coffee shop would not just have an AM peak. She indicated Arden Hills was full of college students that would take advantage of this and use all hours of the day. She feared that this site was too full and did not adequately provide enough parking stalls or space for snow storage. She understood this building had two frontages and questioned if there would be a sidewalk on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. Mr. Anderson reported there would be sidewalks along both frontages. Councilmember Scott asked what Aldi required for parking. Mr. Anderson explained Aldi generally requires 95 parking stalls. He indicated he had parking studies from around the metro with peak time information and noted 95 stalls has been adequate. Councilmember Scott inquired if the other two clients were comfortable with the proposed level of parking. Mr. Anderson stated to date the other two clients were comfortable with the proposed parking. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 4 Councilmember Scott commented he was most concerned with the reduced level of parking on the site, but he also understood parking requirements have changed in the last 10 years. He indicated he would be willing to change some of the landscaping requirements in the interior parking lot if more interior stalls were added to the parking lot. Councilmember Holden stated she was not comfortable with the proposed parking. She reported she did not want parking to spill over onto adjacent uses. She feared how the parking lot would be backed up with cars waiting to get through the coffee shop drive through. In addition, she was concerned about the lack of landscaping. She explained the B-2 requirements were put in place to ensure these commercial and retail developments had a similar look and feel. Lastly, she noted this building would need more windows in order to meet the City’s requirements. Councilmember Scott commented on the setbacks for the site and asked if staff had determined where the front lot line would be. Planning Consultant Kansier reported after investigating this further it appears the front lot line would be along Lexington Avenue. Brian Wurdeman, Civil Engineer for Kimley-Horn, noted the building had a 50 foot building setback from Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. He explained the western and northern sides had a 20 foot setback. He explained the applicant was seeking flexibility along Lexington Avenue and the western property boundary. Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed setbacks for the building. Mayor Grant asked if the front yard setback, along Lexington Avenue was greater than 50 feet. Mr. Wurdeman stated he was looking for flexibility of 30 feet along Lexington Avenue. Mayor Grant questioned what the setback was from Grey Fox Road. Mr. Wurdeman indicated the building was in compliance with the 50 foot setback along Grey Fox Road. Mayor Grant inquired why this Bank of America required less parking. Mr. Anderson explained this was not a full bank but rather was a smaller prototype. Mayor Grant stated this was an appealing market for coffee/bakery uses given the fact Arden Hills had two universities close by and students frequented them for studying. He indicated this created concerns for him regarding the proposed level of parking on this site. Councilmember Holmes explained she was familiar with the Aldi’s in Mounds View and Roseville, both of which had a great deal of parking. She anticipated it was very rare that a retail operation would haul away their snow. She believed it was unrealistic that the Aldi in Arden Hills would haul away its snow. She requested further information regarding the snow removal plan. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 5 Mr. Anderson estimated the Aldi store in Roseville had 90 to 95 parking stalls. He understood it was not standard operations to haul snow away, but in order to make a project work, this would be taken into consideration. Councilmember Holmes expressed frustration with how the developer was changing their answer. She asked if the snow would be stored on site and then removed, or would this simply be considered. Mr. Anderson apologized if he misspoke. He reported he can’t speak to Aldi’s finances but understood they would prefer to not have to remove snow from the site, unless this was required in a site maintenance document. Councilmember Holmes explained the City was not going to tell the developer what to do with their snow. She stated simply that most commercial properties have space on their site for snow storage and do not opt to have the snow hauled away due to the expense. She was of the opinion the developer had not thought this issue through. Councilmember Scott believed that the applicant would not bring forward an application without planning for snow storage. He indicated his only concern with this site plan was the reduced level of parking. Mayor Grant commented there seems to be a delineation between the coffee shop/bank and the grocery store. He asked if this was a property line. Mr. Wurdeman reported this was the case, but noted Launch Properties would be maintaining ownership of the properties. He anticipated the two properties would work together to have snow removed from the site. Councilmember Holden discussed how many people would be visiting the bank and coffee shop use. She was of the opinion the site was under parked and she would not be able to support the plan as proposed. Andrew Mack, Aldi representative, explained the Roseville store has 80 stalls. He anticipated the Arden Hills store would have the same volume in sales as the Roseville store. Councilmember Holmes reported this may be the case, but noted the Roseville store does not also have a bank and coffee shop attached to it. She stated she too was having a problem supporting this concept plan due to the lack of parking. Mayor Grant discussed the trash enclosure area on the site plan and questioned if this would serve all three uses. Mr. Anderson reported Aldi would have a separate trash enclosure near the loading dock area. Mayor Grant questioned how delivery trucks would access the loading dock area. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 6 Mr. Wurdeman described how trucks would enter and exit the site in order to reach the loading dock. Mayor Grant asked if the Fire Marshall had reviewed the plans. Mr. Wurdeman reported the Fire Marshall had not yet reviewed the plans. Mayor Grant commented on the tight turning radiuses that were being proposed and stated it would be important for the Fire Marshall to provide comments on the proposed plan. He explained at this time he was feeling uneasy about supporting this plan. He requested further information regarding the loud speakers that would be used at the coffee shop. Planning Consultant Kansier reported further information would be known about the loud speaker when the preliminary plans were submitted to staff. Councilmember Holden suggested the bank and the coffee shop be eliminated from the project as this would free up more space for landscaping and parking. He encouraged the developer to reconsider the plans so the Council could support the project. Mayor Grant asked if the applicant had any questions for the Council. Mr. Wurdeman thanked the Council for their time and stated he would work to address the parking, snow removal and landscaping concerns that had been brought up by the Council. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Councilmember Holmes requested the Mounds View School District be invited to a future work session in order to discuss the pedestrian crossing at the Mounds View High School. Councilmember Holden asked when the Council would receive an update on water meters. Councilmember Holden discussed the water bill envelopes and questioned when the City would be done using them. City Administrator Perrault explained staff had no intention of going away from that type of envelope. Councilmember Holden stated she would like the Council to discuss the CDBG funds for Arden Manor, along with the additional CARES funds at a future work session. City Administrator Perrault discussed when the City would receive the additional funding from the federal government noting these funds should funnel down from the County in May. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – APRIL 26, 2021 7 ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the Special City Council Work Session at 6:42 p.m. Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor RE: Planning Case 21-007 | 3737 Lexington Avenue N | Launch Prop. & Aldi Dear Arden Hills City Council and Planning division: I’m writing to express a concern I have regarding the Aldi redevelopment project. My main concern is regarding traffic flow, coming out of the west side of the proposed development. The “alley” that runs north/south that is directly east of our space (1157 Grey Fox) and directly west of the proposed Aldi is becoming increasingly busy. Being on this alley and observing it daily, I believe that increased traffic flow is from the new Lexington station development. As a way to move from that development (Lexington Station) south, while skipping some stoplights out on Lexington, drivers aggressively pass through this alley. Here are a few safety concerns that I believe need to be thoughtfully considered based on the behaviors of drivers we observe each day: 1. While I DO NOT represent any concerns from other business owners, both the gyms (the CrossFit gym and Acceleration North) often warm up for their respective activities outdoors (laps around the buildings, stretching, etc.) and the increased traffic and lack of visibility in the alley pass through could present a safety issue. Both of these businesses are in the same warehouse park as our business. 2. Visibility in that alley is not the best, based on the way the buildings are orientated and the foliage. I don’t believe that the alleyway was intended for the kind of traffic it’s seeing. 3. During winter months, the snow removal piles are placed on the very east side of the alley creating large obstacles that pass through cars must avoid by making large swerves westward. 4. In busy times at Aldi, I fear grocery shoppers will spill over into our lot at MerryStockings, along with their carts, and take our parking spaces. Based on behaviors we are seeing my concern is that, if the exit from the Aldi development on the southwest corner remains open to customers leaving directly west out of the parking lot, I believe cars headed north, will turn right (north) and add to the congestion in that alley and increase the safety issues that are currently happening. The alley itself is maintained by Transwestern, does Aldi have the right to create an access to this alley without working with Transwestern? It would be safest if that proposed access point would be sealed off and traffic then would be forced to Grey Fox Road. Thank you for considering this issues and the impact it could have on making this developments safer for citizens of Arden Hills. Respectfully, Jake Witham, President MerryStockings.com Attachment O Planning Case #21-019 – Public Hearing RequiredApplicant: Launch PropertiesProperty Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox RoadRequest: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Attachment P PProposedd UseThis development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, +/- 19,480 square foot ALDI grocery store and an additional pad site with an +/- 5,300 square foot building purposed for a national dental tenant (~ 2,800 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,500 square feet), that will function as one property under the Planned Unit Development. Internal view from parking lot – West Elevation and South Elevation View facing South – North Elevation and West ElevationView from corner of Grey Fox Rd and Lexington Ave facing NW. Aldi – East Elevation and Dental Clinic/Bank – South Elevation and East Elevation OOverview•City Council reviewed a concept plan for this development on April 26, 2021 •Redevelopment of a 2.48-acre site •Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC•Parcel zoning - B-3, Service Business District•2040 Comprehensive Plan – Commercial (COM) •Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land UsesNorth COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food RestaurantSouth COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery StoreWest CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial SSubdivisionn RequirementsExisting Parcel BoundariesProposed LotsLot Square FootageLot WidthLot DepthLot 171,767 295 ft. 250 ft.Lot 237,132250 ft. – Lexington Ave.139 ft. – Grey Fox Rd.139 to 151 ft. – Lexington Ave.250 ft. – Grey Fox Rd.B-3 Minimum Dimensions:•Lot Area - 13,000 sq. ft. •Lot Width - 100 ft. •Lot Depth. 130 ft. •Subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. PPerformanceStandardss forr B-33 DistrictOrdinance RequirementsB-3 District StandardsProposed DevelopmentProposed DevelopmentMaximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 Meets RequirementsMaximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% Meets RequirementsMinimum Landscape Lot Area25% 16% Flexibility RequestedMinimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft.Bank/Dental: 19.2 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 ft. Grey Fox RoadAldi: 74 ft. – Grey Fox RoadFlexibility RequestedMinimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft.Bank/Dental: 21.4 ft.Aldi: 30 ft. Meets RequirementsMinimum Side Yard Setback20 ft. (min)/40 ft. (total)Bank/Dental: +/- 62 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total)Aldi: 120 ft. (east) and 10 ft. (west)Flexibility RequestedMinimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft.Lot 1 – 71,767 sq. ft. Lot 2 - 37,132 sq. ft.Meets RequirementsMaximum Building Height 35 ft. +/- 29 ft. Meets Requirements PPerformancee StandardsSetbacks – Flexibility RequestedOrdinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed DevelopmentMinimum Front Yard Setback50 ft.Bank/Dental: 19.2 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 138 ft. Grey Fox RoadAldi: 74 ft. – Grey Fox RoadMinimum Rear Yard Setback20 ft.Bank/Dental: 21.4 ft.Aldi: 30 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback20 ft. (min)/40 ft. (total)Bank/Dental: +/- 62 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total)Aldi: 120 ft. (east) and 10 ft. (west) DDesignn StandardsBuilding Positioning – Flexibility Requested•Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E - 50% of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line. •B-3 District Front Setback - 50 feet •Proposed bank/dental clinic building - 19.2 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue, +/- 138 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. •Aldi building - 74 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. DDesignn Standardss ––AldiExterior Materials –Flexibility Requested•At least 75% must be a combination of brick, masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or equivalent, glass.•Aldi building elevations consist of masonry, cedar fiber cement panels and aluminum composite panels with metal coping. •Aldi is seeking flexibility of the masonry product as a comparable to brick masonry in combination with fiber cement boards and aluminum composite panels. •Use of aluminum composite panel ranges from 23% of the east elevation to 14% on the south elevation. DDesignn Standards-AldiExterior Materials –Flexibility Requested•Aldi requests use of Spec-Brik for the masonry material. •Spec-Brik is a concrete masonry unit with a brick like texture that replicates a traditional clay brick. •Masonry face will be:•4’ wide by 8’ high •12’ wide by 8’ high (cart wall only)•Installation is similar to a brick and mortar process.•Masonry Breakdown:•North Elevation – 71%•South Elevation – 30%•East Elevation – 40%•West Elevation – 65% Transparency –Flexibility Requested•Aldi building will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. •50% of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities.•South elevation of Aldi building - 11% of clear glazingDDesignn Standardss ––Aldi Exterior Materials –Flexibility Requested•At least 75% must be a combination of brick, masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or equivalent, glass.•Outparcel building consists of masonry, cedar fiber cement panels and aluminum composite panels with metal coping. •Applicant is seeking flexibility of the masonry product as a comparable to brick masonry in combination with fiber cement boards and aluminum composite panels. DDesignn Standardss ––Dentall Clinicc && Bank DDesignn Standardss –Dentall Clinicc && BankExterior Materials –Flexibility Requested•Outparcel building will feature Belden Brick in 2 colors for the masonry material. •Installation is similar to a brick and mortar process.•Masonry Breakdown:•North Elevation – 38%•South Elevation – 52%•East Elevation – 40%•West Elevation – 25% Transparency –Flexibility Requested•50% of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities.•Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are reasonably visible to the general public.•South Elevation - 20% clear glazing•East elevation - 29% opaque spandrel glassEast Elevation – Lexington AvenueSouth Elevation – Grey Fox RoadDDesignn Standardss –Dentall Clinicc && Bank DDesignn StandardsLighting –Meets Requirements •Plan includes:•Wall mounted lights around the building•25’ light poles in parking lot and drive aisles DDesignn StandardsLandscaping –Flexibility Requested •B-3 minimum landscape lot area – 25% •Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area - 16%•Project narrative states the project will provide significant landscaped green space along Lexington Avenue at grade level. •Proposing the addition of 30 trees throughout the site. DDesignn StandardsLandscaping –Flexibility Requested •Minimum of 1 tree be provided along the ROW of every 50 feet of public street frontage. •Required to plant 14 trees along the Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. •Applicant revised Landscape Plan to plant 7 trees. DDesignn StandardsLandscaping –Flexibility Requested •Section 1325.04, Subd. 2, requires landscaping on lots used for drive-up windows to the minimum widths:Front Lot Line - 20’Side Lot Line - 10’Rear Lot Line - 15’•Drive-thru lane will be approximately 8’ from the north property line and 5’ from the east property line. DDesignn StandardsParking –Flexibility Requested •Off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the ROW of any public street. •Applicant is proposing a 5 foot and 9 foot setback from the ROW along Grey Fox Rd. DDesign StandardsNumber of Parking Stalls –Flexibility Requested Total Site Proposing – 140 parking spacesTotal Required – 120 parking spaces•Changes to site layout resulted in Aldi having 2 less parking spaces than the minimum requirement. •New layout added 1,350 square feet of landscaping. •Applicant seeks flexibility with shared parking through the Master PUD. Land UseProposedSquareFootageRequiredStallsNumber of StallsProvidedGrocery Store –x1 space per 150 SF of retailgross floor areax1 space per 1,000 SF ofback room/coolerx1 space per 250 SF of office12,8384,59067094 92 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF ofgross floor area2,500 10 10Dental Office – 1 space perdentist & technician, and 1space per 200 SF of gross floorarea2,800 16 38Site Total:120 140 DDesignn StandardsPedestrian and Bicycle Circulation –Meets Requirements•Minimum 6 foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all ROW. •Proposed 6 foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. •Applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue. Notes this will be part of the future Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project.•City and County will split the cost of Lexington Avenue sidewalk 50/50. •Consistent with Lexington Station Phase 3 may consider a condition that states “The Developer shall construct a sidewalk from Lexington Avenue into the Subject Site. The Developer shall use best efforts to obtain approvals from Ramsey County to constructa sidewalk along Lexington Avenue should the County not proceed with their Lexington Avenue Improvements.”•Bicycle rack on the east side of the Aldi building complies. DDesignn StandardsSnow Storage •Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. •Proposing to store snow in the NW and SE corner of the proposed site and has indicated that in scenarios of excessive snowfall that snow will be hauled away from the site. •During the concept plan discussion, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. •Applicant has indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. DDesignn StandardsFreestanding Signs – Flexibility Requested•Sign District 5 allows 1 freestanding sign up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16’ in height. •Shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site. •Proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16’ in height and has a total sign copy area of 108 square feet allocated between the three tenants. DDesignn SStandardsWall Signs –Flexibility Requested•Code allows wall signs up to 80 square feet•Applicant is proposing:•One 75 square foot sign on two elevations for Aldi•One 33 square foot sign for each tenant for outparcel – interior facing•One 14 square foot sign for each tenant for outparcel – east elevation•One 33 square foot sign for each tenant for outparcel – north and south elevation•All signage is noted to be internally lit DDesign StandardsDrive-Through Facilities –Flexibility Requested•Section 1325.04 states:•no drive up facility shall be located within 1,320’ of another facility. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly to the north. •During the concept review, the Applicant was originally proposing a coffee shop/food and beverage tenant for the northern endcap of the outparcel building. •That triggered discussion on possible traffic congestion, shared parking, and sufficient space for drive-thru stacking. •The tenant occupancy has changed to a bank. •The Applicant has stated that the change in tenant will eliminate the concerns previously expressed. •The Applicant is not proposing any electronic devices. Plan Evaluation Summary DDesignn StandardsTraffic Study and Site Circulation•No new access is proposed. •The Applicant intends to utilize 2 of the existing accesses and remove 2. •Access 1 is a two-way entrance that will be located on Grey Fox Road and is noted to be primarily used. •Access 2 leads onto the alley on the western boundary of the site. •City Attorney has suggested that the Applicant provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement.View from Grey Fox Road facing NorthView facing West towards 3728 Dunlap Street Additional Reviews:•Fire Marshal has confirmed layout would be sufficient for emergency vehicle access and movements. •City Engineer has confirmed site plans adjusted with no conflicts. •During the concept review, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the site for access to the loading dock on the north side of the proposed Aldi building. Public Notice•Notice was republished in the Pioneer Press on September 30, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. •No comments received. Planning Case 21-019 – Launch Properties31Questions? Page 1 of 5 NEW BUSINESS – 9A MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-019 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: x Planning Case 21-019 for the Launch Properties Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review. Approval of a PUD requires an affirmative vote of four councilmembers. Background Launch Properties (“The Applicant”), on behalf of Aldi, is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N (“Subject Property”) and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The subject property is currently two lots with one building developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would adjust the existing lot line to the east. This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one 19,480 square foot grocery store and one 5,350 square foot dental/office building. Requested Action Page 2 of 5 A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for all new development and redevelopment in the B-3 District. In addition, a PUD would allow for performance standard flexibility. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. Suggested Findings of Fact: The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 8, 2021 meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration: 1. The properties located at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road are designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For building construction or site modifications not included on the Master Plan, a PUD Amendment is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master Plan Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, setbacks, building positioning, building façade, building materials, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Master Planned Unit Development request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 10. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 8, 2021. Options and Motion Language The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 8, 2021 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval with conditions of the Launch Properties application for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review by a 5-0 vote. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider. x Approve with Conditions: Motion to approve Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the October 11, 2021 Report to the City Council: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Page 3 of 5 2. The Master Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer item identified in the October 11th Report to the City Council and the September 1, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right- of- way. Page 4 of 5 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. The sign copy area for the freestanding monument sign shall be reduced from 108 square feet to 100 square feet as allowed in Sign District 5. Wall signage shall be approved as requested by the Applicant. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master PUD Development Agreement. 23. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 24. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 25. The Property Owner shall provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement for use of the western access located on 3728 Dunlap Street. 26. The sidewalk width along Grey Fox Road shall be increased from five feet to six feet. 27. The Applicant shall reconfigure the site layout between the number of off-street parking spaces and ratio of landscaping. 28. The Applicant shall meet transparency requirements for the outparcel building on the Lexington Avenue elevation. x Approve as Submitted: Motion to approve Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 11, 2021 Report to the City Council. x Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table of Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Page 5 of 5 Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 19, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 18, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Budget Impact NA Attachments A. New Business Presentation Planning Case #21-019 – Public Hearing RequiredApplicant: Launch PropertiesProperty Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox RoadRequest: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Attachment A Deadline for Agency Action•The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 19, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 18, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. •Approve with Conditions: Motion to approvePlanning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the 28 conditions in the October 11, 2021 Report to the City Council. •Approve as Submitted: Motion to approvePlanning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 11, 2021 Report to the City Council.3Options and Motion Language •Denial: Motion to denyPlanning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. •Table: Motion to tableof Planning Case 21-019 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue and 1133 Grey Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. 4Options and Motion Language CConditions of Approval51) The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council.2) The Master Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted.3) A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit.4) A Master PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits.5) The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. CConditions of Approval7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities.8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer item identified in the October 11thReport to the City Council and the September 1, 2021 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit.10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits.11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review.12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site.13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant.6 CConditions of Approval14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of way.15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements.17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. The sign copy area for the freestanding monument sign shall be reduced from 108 square feet to 100 square feet as allowed in Sign District 5. Wall signage shall be approved as requested by the Applicant. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage.19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department.20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets.7 CConditions of Approval22. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master PUD Development Agreement.23. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 24. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 25. The Property Owner shall provide evidence of or obtain an ingress/egress easement for use of the western access located on 3728 Dunlap Street. 26. The sidewalk width along Grey Fox Road shall be increased from five feet to six feet. 27. The Applicant shall reconfigure the site layout between the number of off-street parking spaces and ratio of landscaping.28. The Applicant shall meet transparency requirements for the outparcel building on the Lexington Avenue elevation. 8 Planning Case 21-019 – Launch Properties9Questions?