HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-03-21-Planning CommissionAPPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 6, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting
10 -06 -21 PC.PDF
PLANNING CASES
Planning Case 21 -025 –4200 Round Lake Road –Site Plan Review (No Public
Hearing Required)
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
COMMENTS AND REPORTS
Report From The City Council
Planning Commission Comments
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURN
A quorum of the City Council may be
present at this meeting.
Chair:
Paul Vijums
Commissioners:
Steven Jones
Subbaya
Subramanian
Jonathan Wicklund
Clayton
Zimmerman
Marcie Jefferys
Kurt Weber
Council Liaison:
Fran Holmes
Planning Commission
November 3, 2021
6:30 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651 -792 -7800
Website :
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting,
strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained
infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable
City in which to live, work, and play.
This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website
Agenda
CALL TO ORDER
1.
2.
2.A.
Documents:
3.
3.A.
Documents:
4.
5.
5.A.
5.B.
6.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAPPROVAL OF MINUTESOctober 6, 2021 Planning Commission Regular Meeting10-06 -21 PC.PDFPLANNING CASESPlanning Case 21 -025 –4200 Round Lake Road –Site Plan Review (No Public Hearing Required)MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDF
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
COMMENTS AND REPORTS
Report From The City Council
Planning Commission Comments
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURN
A quorum of the City Council may be
present at this meeting.
Chair:Paul Vijums Commissioners:Steven JonesSubbaya SubramanianJonathan WicklundClayton ZimmermanMarcie JefferysKurt WeberCouncil Liaison:Fran Holmes Planning Commission November 3, 2021 6:30 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting,strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirableCity in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AgendaCALL TO ORDER1.2.2.A.Documents:3.3.A.Documents:
4.
5.
5.A.
5.B.
6.
Approved:November 3, 2021
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2021
6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Paul Vijums called to order the regular Planning
Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present were: Chair Paul Vijums, Commissioners Marcie Jefferys (attending via Zoom), Subbaya
Subramanian, Kurtis Weber (attending via Zoom), and Clayton Zimmerman.
Absent: Commissioner Jonathan Wicklund.
Also present were: Senior Planner Jessica Jagoe and Councilmember Steve Scott.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA – OCTOBER 6, 2021
Chair Vijums moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to approve the October 6,
2021, agenda as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-
0).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September 8, 2021 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Subramanian, to approve
the September 8, 2021, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. A roll call
vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
PLANNING CASES
A.Planning Case 21-021; 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue –
Minor Subdivision – Public Hearing
Senior Planner Jagoe stated the Minor Subdivision has been requested to allow for the
alteration of the property line between the subject properties. Currently, the two properties have
joint access to a driveway that crosses the shared property line. The Applicants are requesting the Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 2
Minor Subdivision to alter the property line to include all of the shared driveway. This would
involve adding 796 square feet (excluding ROW) of property to Subject Property A, owned by
the Applicants.
Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the
Findings of Fact for review:
1. The properties at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue are located in the
R-2 – Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District.
2. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates the properties at 3300 New
Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue as Low Density Residential.
3. The Applicants have submitted an application for a Minor Subdivision to adjust the side
yard lot line between the two existing properties.
4. The proposed Minor Subdivision is not creating a new lot of record.
5. The request proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a single-family
dwelling.
6. The Owner of the platted lot has filed with the zoning administrator a registered land
survey of the lot line adjustment.
7. The proposed division will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
adjacent tracts in the area in which the subdivision tract is located.
Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21- 021 for a Minor
Subdivision at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue, based on the findings of
fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the October 6, 2021, Report to the
Planning Commission:
1) The Applicant shall record the Minor Subdivision with Ramsey County and a copy shall
be provided to the City within sixty (60) days of the City’s approval.
2) The Applicant shall record the drainage and utility easements as shown on the submitted
survey with Ramsey County and a copy shall be provided to the City within sixty (60)
days of the City’s approval.
3) Monument stakes shall be installed to demarcate the property lines adjusted between
Property A and Property B.
Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this
matter:
1. Recommend Approval with Conditions
2. Recommend Approval as Submitted
3. Recommend Denial
4. Table
Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments.
Chair Vijums requested further information on how the driveway would be impacted.
Senior Planner Jagoe explained the area in blue on the map was the driveway areas that would
be removed. Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 3
Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m.
Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment.
There being no comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 6:43 p.m.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved and Commissioner Subramanian seconded a motion to
recommend approval of Planning Case 21-021 for a Minor Subdivision at 3300 New
Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue based on the findings of fact and the submitted
plans, as amended by the conditions in the October 6, 2021, report to the Planning
Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
B. Planning Case 21-023; City of Arden Hills – 3588 Ridgewood Road – Public Hearing
Not Required
Senior Planner Jagoe stated at the September 8th Planning Commission meeting, the
Commission made a motion to table action on this agenda item in order to seek a legal opinion
from the City Attorney as to whether or not conditions could be included directing the process of
the land sale. Following this action, City Staff contacted the City Attorney to verify the discretion
allowed within this review. The City Attorney has confirmed that as established by State Statute
the role of the Planning Commission is this instance is limited to determining whether or not the
proposed sale is in compliance with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. The Planning
Commission does not have the authority to add conditions to direct the terms of the sale.
Senior Planner Jagoe commented also from this meeting, the Commission noted that Ramsey
County’s GIS had shown a map label of “Park” on the subject parcel. This label was populated
within their mapping layers under Lot Text. City Staff contacted the Assessor’s Office to
research prior documentation of park dedication. The County noted that it was possible they had
this identifier prior to the City acquiring the land and that the map was never updated, but no
formal dedication was found. The City Attorney has reviewed the information and questions
raised by the Commission regarding this map label. Their office has confirmed that a statement
of purpose for which a property is to be used is not sufficient to create a restrictive use covenant.
Such a restriction would have required language within the deed. On August 6th, the City
received the completed title report which confirmed there are no deed restrictions prohibiting the
City from selling this parcel.
Senior Planner Jagoe commented on the request further and provided the Findings of Fact for
review:
1. The property at 3588 Ridgewood Road is located in the R-1, Single Family Residential
Zoning District.
2. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan has the property guided toward Low Density
Residential on the Future Land Use Plan.
3. The subject property is a nonconforming lot.
4. The development of the site for a single family residential dwelling is a permitted use
within the R-1 Zoning District. Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 4
5. The adjacent properties are developed as single family residential and are zoned R-1
Single Family Residential and are guided Low Density Residential uses in the Arden
Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
6. The sale of the city owned parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road is determined to be in
compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21-023
recommending that a potential sale of City owned property at 3588 Ridgewood Road would be in
compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as presented in the September 8 and October 6,
2021 Reports to the Planning Commission.
Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this
matter:
1. Recommend Approval
2. Recommend Denial
3. Table
Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments.
Commissioner Jefferys thanked staff for all of the follow up work on this matter. She explained
after reviewing this information, the sale of this property was consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
Commissioner Weber indicated the previous park designation that was on the GIS map was
probably the most likely document to be seen by the public. He stated it was unfortunate because
this may have guided the neighbors decisions. He explained he did believe the sale of the
property was in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Subramanian asked if the City Engineer had made a recommendation on if this
lot was buildable.
Senior Planner Jagoe commented any future home plans as well as site grading and retaining
walls would be reviewed by the City Engineer. However, that would be part of the Future
Buyers due diligence in this process to provide documentation prior to closing.
Chair Vijums explained he was not at the last Planning Commission meeting. He understood
there were fruitful discussions regarding this matter. He indicated he was concerned with the fact
this property would be sold and the future owners and several variances would be required. He
wished these future owners understood that variances would be required in order to make this
property work. He stated he would not be in favor of a home being built on this property because
it would require several variances.
Senior Planner Jagoe explained a variance would be needed due to the nonconforming lot size
and that the City cannot prohibit a potential future buyer from asking for additional variances, but
that staff would communicate in the listing the parameters of this property. She indicated the City
has had two interested parties and this information has been conveyed. Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 5
Chair Vijums stated he did believe this property sale was in compliance with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, which was the request before the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved and Commissioner Subramanian seconded a motion to
recommend approval of Planning Case 21-023 recommending that a potential sale of City
owned property at 3588 Ridgewood Road would be in compliance with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan as presented in the September 8, 2021 and October 6, 2021 Reports to
the Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-
0).
C. Planning Case 21-024; City of Arden Hills – Zoning Code Amendment to Sections
1320.06, District Requirements Chart and 1325.05, Design Standards for Revisions
to the B-2, General Business District and B-3, Service Business District – Public
Hearing
Senior Planner Jagoe stated starting in 2018, the City Council began discussions on possible
amendments with regards to the design standards and placement of buildings for the B-2 Zoning
District. The B-2 District generally includes the properties along the County Road E corridor
between Highway 51 and Lexington Avenue North. The district is a mix of new and older
buildings and primarily retail, service, and office uses. For new development in this district, the
Zoning Code identifies design standards that regulate placement of the building and parking
areas. The City Council’s initial review involved discussions on the front yard setback in
business districts and consideration for amending the language from 20 feet to 50 feet to be
consistent with the B-3 District. In addition, the Council reviewed removal of two parking
setback requirements that would allow a Developer more flexibility in the placement of buildings
and parking areas in the B-2 District.
Senior Planner Jagoe commented from this initial work session, the City Council also identified
additional concerns with building façade requirements. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council held
two more work sessions whereby providing feedback and direction to staff on revisions for
consideration in the B-2 District. The Council requested staff review the transparency
requirements for commercial developments as well as the use of other types of coating on glass
as a means of complying with ordinance requirements.
Senior Planner Jagoe reported at the work session meeting on December 21, 2020, the City
Council discussed the Staff suggested amendments regarding front yard setback and removal of
design standard language in order to allow more flexibility in placement of the buildings in B-2
District. The consensus was to remove a sentence within Commercial Façade Transparency,
Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F.1 that allowed discretion for waiving the transparency requirements.
The rational was that this flexibility already exists through the Planned Unit Development review
and a Developer could suggest alternate considerations. For façade transparency, the City will
continue to require 50% of all first level building facades that front a public street to be
comprised of transparent windows or doors. The language to be removed was a second
requirement of 20% for all facades that are reasonably visible from the right-of-way. With the
language amendments to the building and parking setbacks it is anticipated that there will be
fewer issues on design challenges with building orientation and the back side of a building facing
the public street. The proposed changes still ensures that the appearance of blank walls would not Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 6
face the street. Following the discussion, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed
ordinance amendments to the Planning Commission and to hold a public hearing.
Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the proposed Ordinance amendments and provided the Findings
of Fact for review:
1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language for the design
standards in the B-2, General Business Zoning District and B-3, Service Business
District.
2. The City of Arden Hills is proposing a front yard setback of 50 feet in the B-2, General
Business Zoning District.
3. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning
Code of the City Code.
4. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by
the City Council.
Senior Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21-024 as presented
(or as modified by Planning Commission) for a Zoning Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the
Arden Hills City Code to amend and strike ordinance language in the B-2, General Business
District for the front yard setback as well as requirements to building façade and parking setback
standards that includes the B-3, Service Business District as presented in the October 6, 2021
Report to the Planning Commission.
Senior Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this
matter:
1. Recommend Approval
2. Recommend Denial
3. Table
Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments.
Commissioner Jefferys asked how the Goodwill and Walgreens would look if these
requirements had been in place when these buildings were constructed.
Senior Planner Jagoe discussed how the front yard setback would change and noted how the
building placement would have been impacted.
Commissioner Weber stated he believed these were all good changes.
Chair Vijums questioned if these changes were made based on other communities making
changes, or because the City was making variances in these areas.
Senior Planner Jagoe explained she could not answer specifically what was occurring in other
communities. She anticipated this may have been part of the research, but noted the City Council
held numerous workshops on this topic to address language changes for the B-2 zoning district.
Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. Draft
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 6, 2021 7
Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment.
There being no additional comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved and Commissioner Subramanian seconded a motion to
recommend approval of Planning Case 21-024 as presented for a Zoning Code Amendment
to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to amend and strike ordinance language in the
B-2, General Business District for the front yard setback as well as requirements to
building façade and parking setback standards that includes the B-3, Service Business
District as presented in the October 6, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. A roll call
vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
None.
REPORTS
A. Report from the City Council
Councilmember Scott provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. He
reported the State of the City event has been postponed and noted a recorded event would be
delivered at some time in the near future. He discussed the actions of the Council at its recent
meeting noting both Planning Cases were approved. He commented on the construction that
occurred along Lexington Avenue and noted a Chick-Fil-A was being built on the old Perkins
site. He noted the newly renovated stadium at Bethel was recently completed. He reported the
Council would be reviewing the City’s drive-thru requirements given the fact there has been an
increase in the number of drive-thru businesses due to COVID. He stated the groundbreaking
ceremony for the senior living facility along Pine Tree Drive would occur on Wednesday,
October 13. He commented the litigation for TCAAP was now complete.
B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests
None.
ADJOURN
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Subramanian, to adjourn
the October 6, 2021, Planning Commission Meeting at 7:22 p.m. A roll call vote was taken.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Draft
Page 1 of 9
PC Agenda Item – 3A
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 3, 2021
TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-025 – No Public Hearing Required
Applicant: Scannell Properties, LLC
Property Location: 4200 Round Lake Road
Request: Site Plan Review
Requested Action
Dan Salzer, Scannell Properties, LLC (“The Applicant”) has submitted a land use application for
Site Plan Review for a project located at 4200 Road Lake Road (“Subject Property”). In October
2020, the City approved a Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development to the
subject property that allowed for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse
facility. The Applicant is seeking approval for expansion of the parking lot in order to construct
a parking area that was previously identified as proof of parking. The Subject Property is zoned
GB, Gateway Business District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the Land Use Plan.
Background
1. Overview of Request
Scannell Properties was approved Resolution 2020-045 (Attachment D) for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) subject to 35 conditions on October 12, 2020 that was part of a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) for the subject property in order to operate a warehouse use in the facility to
be constructed. The approximate 21 acre site is located south of the cul-de-sac on Gateway
Boulevard and north of Interstate 694 and east of 35W. The Subject Property had been vacant
since 2006 with wetlands located adjacent to Interstates (“35W and 694”).
The site is highly visible from 694 and 35W. Separate access points to the site are provided via
Gateway Boulevard for employee parking and deliveries. The site development will include
office space, warehousing, ground level unloading access with 38 dock doors located on the
north side of the building, and at-grade office parking lots located on the south side of the
building.
Page 2 of 9
One of the conditions from Resolution 2020-045 stated “Site Plan approval shall be required for
the construction of the proof of parking area”. The Applicant has a prospective tenant that will
occupy 2/3rd’s of the building which also necessitates the need for construction of this future
parking area. Therefore, the Applicant is pursuing the Site Plan Review for expansion of the
parking area.
Plan Evaluation
Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review
1. Land Use Chart (GB Gateway Business District) – Section 1320.05
Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided as Light Industrial and Office use.
Light Industrial and Office (I/O) uses are areas designated for a broad range of light industrial uses
such as warehousing with manufacturing. This land use may also include offices. According to
the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the expected share of uses within this area are 50 percent to 100
percent Light Industrial or up to 100 percent Office. The subject property is located in the GB,
Gateway Business District. Warehouse is a conditional use in this district.
2. General Requirements - Sections 1325.05 and 1325.06
A. Parking and Site Operations – Meets Requirements
The proposed Site Plan Review is not modifying any portion of the previously approved parking
lot layout. The proof of parking area was identified on these earlier plans as a supplemental
parking area. It was stated that this was conceptual in the event additional parking is required to
meet the demands of a future tenant. The original approval for parking spaces, drive aisles, and
layout with the building construction all remain unchanged as part of this review.
Under the new site plan with the additional parking area, the Applicant is proposing to establish
a fourth access onto Gateway Boulevard. This new access would be classified as an employee
driveway access. The Zoning Code has access/driveway width standards for streets classified as
minor and collector streets. However, Gateway Boulevard is classified as neither a minor or
collector roadway and instead it is identified as a municipal state aid street. The Public Works
Director/City Engineer is reviewing the proposed new access with regards to number of accesses
requested, spacing, and sizing of driveway width.
Based on the PUD approvals, the building would be a maximum of 85 percent warehouse and a
minimum of 15 percent office. Per City Code, Business & Professional Office uses must provide
one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The approved plans for the
building identified the office floor area as 37,500 square feet and that would require 150 parking
stalls. Other Business and Industry uses would need to provide one (1) for each employee on
shift plus one (1) for each vehicle used in conducting the business or one (1) for each 1,000 sq.
ft. of floor area, whichever is greater. The Applicant had shown a floor area of 212,500 square
feet and that would require 212 parking stalls. In October 2020, the approved plans depicted 363
parking spaces and the proposed uses required 362 stalls. As part of the October review, the
Page 3 of 9
Applicant had noted the possibility of constructing the expanded parking area which would add
198 stalls. In total, the site would have 561 parking stalls.
B. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Shown
The GB district requires a 50 foot setback for parking areas from public streets and ROW. The
Applicant has shown a 49.4 foot setback from the west property line facing 35W and a 28.2 foot
setback from the north property line facing Gateway Boulevard ROW. Under the PUD,
flexibility was approved for a 20 foot setback from Gateway Boulevard for the main parking area
reviewed along with the building design. The proposed parking lot expansion aligns with the
placement of the previously approved parking areas along Gateway Boulevard. It was noted
during the last review that the proposed parking areas are located approximately 50 feet from the
back of curb of Gateway Boulevard. Additionally, that several properties along Round Lake
Road and Gateway Boulevard have similar or greater reduction in parking lot setbacks.
If the Planning Commission feedback is generally supportive of site plans as submitted, the
Applicant would be required to submit for a Planned Unit Development Amendment in order to
seek approval of flexibility for parking setbacks. Site Plan Review authority is limited in
approval to plans prepared in accordance with city codes. The Applicant would be required to
amend the site plans to adhere to a 50 foot setback for the expanded parking area under the Site
Plan Review. Planning Staff has included a recommended condition of approval that an
amended site plan that complies with parking setbacks would be required for Zoning Department
approval prior to issuance of permits.
C. Lighting – Meets Requirements
The Applicant has submitted a lighting plan that identifies pole heights and lumen levels at the
property lines. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be
shoebox style and downward directed with flush lenses. The Applicant is proposing to use the
same LED lighting to illuminate the parking areas as previously approved. Consistent with the
previous approval, Staff recommends reiteration of the condition that all lighting shall be
downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses.
D. Trees along Street Frontage – Meets Requirements
A minimum of one tree shall be provided along the right of way for every 50 feet of public street
frontage. The proposed frontage on Gateway Boulevard is 1,484 feet and requires 30 trees. The
Applicant is not proposing a reduction to the previously approved landscape plan which included
the planting of 71 trees along the right of way adjacent to Gateway Boulevard area. In fact, the
updated landscape plan shows the addition of one tree with the redesigned curbing.
Page 4 of 9
E. Minimum Caliper Inches – Flexibility Granted
Tree mitigation was not required as the current site had no trees deemed significant per City
Code. The Zoning Code requires that a minimum number of caliper inches of trees be provided
based on the gross square footage of the building on the property. A single story building in
excess of thirty (30) feet in height shall be considered a two-story building for the purposes of
determining gross square footage. The proposed building would be considered a two-stories, and
includes 499,552 gross square feet. This requires a minimum of 1,561 caliper inches or 624 two
(2) caliper trees.
Flexibility was granted from this requirement as part of the previous approvals for the building
construction. It was noted that the proposed site is limited to where trees can be planted onsite
due the wetlands and overhead power lines. The Applicant was approved for the planting of 310
caliper inches or 110 trees. As part of this Site Plan Review for the parking lot expansion, the
Applicant has included an additional planting of eight (8) trees.
F. Tree Selection – Meets Requirements
The proposed updated landscape plan includes a variety of tree species, including maples, oaks
and evergreens, ranging in size from two and half (2.5) to six (6) caliper inches. This is
consistent with ordinance requirements. The Applicant is proposing to plant six (6) to twelve
(12) foot tall evergreens.
G. Landscaped Area and Perennials and Shrubberies – Flexibility Granted
Zoning Code requires 35 percent of the site to be landscaped or 339,674 square feet. The
landscaping plan shows that the total landscaped area provided on the site is 652,668 square feet.
The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 10 percent of the total landscaped area to be covered
with perennials and/or shrubbery. The total landscaped area on the site is 652,668 square feet,
resulting in the need for a minimum of 65,266 square feet of perennial and shrubbery cover. The
Applicant has been approved for 2,888 square feet of perennial and shrub planting beds. In
addition, the Applicant was approved for the use of over 170,000 square feet of Mesic Prairie
seed mix onsite. Mesic Prairie is a prairie plant community dominated by native grasses such as
big bluestem, switchgrasses and including abundant wildflowers.
The updated landscaping plan shows the perimeter of the proposed parking lot expansion would
still be planted with the Mesic Prairie seed mix. However, the updated plan includes an
additional 108 shrubs and 151 perennials planted within the parking islands. The types of
plantings are a variety of species consistent with the previously approved landscape plan.
Gateway Boulevard
Page 5 of 9
H. Drainage Wetlands and Flood Plain – Section 1325.05 Subd. 2 – Meets Requirements
The City Code requires stormwater management be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration,
and water quality requirements. The project was previously approved for construction of three
(3) stormwater ponds. The first pond is located in the middle of the loading area. The other two
(2) ponds were to be located adjacent to 694 and 35W. The proposed parking lot expansion
would be constructed in the general area of the previously identified pond adjacent to 35W.
It was noted in the October 2020 Staff Report that when the proof of parking stalls are needed
that the Applicant would need to construct an underground retention area in the same area to
replace the existing stormwater pond located adjacent to 35W. The Applicant as part of this Site
Plan Review is proposing to construct an underground retention system. City code requires that
off-street parking areas and drives shall be improved with a paved surface and that such areas
shall be so graded and drained so as to dispose of all surface water accumulation within the area
as required by the City and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Public Works Director/City
Engineer is reviewing the underground retention system design and infiltration rates with regards
to potential impacts of existing wetlands, public versus private runoff, and access to nearby
utilities and easements. The parking lot expansion from a zoning review may seem simplistic,
but that far be the case from a Public Works/Engineering standpoint. Planning Staff has included
the Public Works Director/City Engineer preliminary comments under Additional Review.
However given the complexity of this design and parking lot location with the logistics of
easements, wetlands, and stormwater maintenance a full review will not be complete for
inclusion with this report. Staff will work to have an update on the PW/Engineering review for
the Commission at the meeting.
In addition, the Applicant has indicated that the updated site plans and underground retention
systems plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District, but they have not
received a comment review letter or approval from the Watershed. Therefore, Planning Staff
recommends Planning Commission consideration of a condition of Site Plan Review would be
subject to approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Lastly, it should be noted that upon the determination of the Public Works Director/City
Engineer that the proposed plans would be compliant then the Applicant would be required to
apply for a separate land disturbance permit for construction of the parking expansion area. This
work may not be completed under any of the previously issued permits for this project. Prior to
the issuance of a land disturbance permit for the parking lot expansion area, the Applicant shall
submit an amended operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all onsite
stormwater facilities subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The stormwater
maintenance plan shall also require review of the City Attorney prior to approval of the City
Council. This agreement needs to be fully executed prior to issuance of the land disturbance
permit.
3. Easements
The Subject Parcel was required to dedicate several easements as part of the platting process
with the subdivision of land that occurred as part of the approvals for construction of the new
building. The City required dedication of drainage and utility easements over the existing
Page 6 of 9
wetlands on the property. In addition, the Subject Parcel has a Utility Easement and Power Line
Easement in the general area of where the proposed parking lot expansion is to be located. The
Applicant has indicated that following approval of the Site Plan that they would subsequently
apply for an easement vacation and/or dedicate any new easements as deemed necessary by the
Public Works Director/City Engineer for utility purposes. Planning Staff has included as a
recommended condition the requirement for vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as
determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to the issuance of any land
disturbance permits.
1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications
Section 1355.04,Subd.5of the Arden Hills Zoning Code states that a public hearing is not required
for Site Plan Review, but neighboring property owners shall be notified. Notification was prepared
in accordance with City policy.
Additional Review
Building Inspector
The Building Inspector has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. City
code states that a building permit shall be required in such case where a commercial, industrial,
public or semi-public land use is intending to construct on-site parking containing a site aggregate
of more than four (4) spaces or a loading facility that is not a part of, or has prior approval as part
of a site plan for which a building permit has been issued. Construction is underway for the
office/warehouse building. Therefore, a building permit will be required prior to any construction
taking place of the expanded parking lot area.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Proposed Parking Expansion
Page 7 of 9
The Public Works Director/City Engineer is currently finalizing the review of plans submitted for
the parking lot expansion and underground retention system. The following is not intended to be
a complete list of reviews, but rather a brief overview to provide the Planning Commission with
preliminary list of items under review:
1. Stormwater Management and Maintenance
2. Underground Retention System
3. Easements
4. Access to Utilities
5. Driveway Accesses and Widths along Gateway Boulevard
6. Pond and Wetland Impacts
Findings of Fact
The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application
would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the
aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration:
General Findings:
1. The Applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan Review to construct additional
parking previously identified as “proof of parking” at the subject property 4200 Round
Lake Road.
2. The Subject Property is located with the Gateway Business (“GB”) District and is guided
as Light Industrial & Office on the 2040 Land Use Plan.
3. The Applicant operates under a Master Planned Unit Development and has been approved
for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility on the Subject
Property.
4. Flexibility through the PUD process was granted in the following areas: parking setbacks,
minimum caliper inches, and perennials and shrubberies.
5. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City.
6. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the
community as a whole.
7. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust,
air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics.
8. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions.
9. The accessory off-street parking would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning
Code.
10. A public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review.
Proposed Motion Language
Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case.
1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-
025 for Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the
Page 8 of 9
submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the November 3, 2021, Report to the Planning
Commission:
1) All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development
shall remain in full force and effect.
2) That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended
by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by
the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and
City Council.
3) The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code.
4) A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion.
5) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in
writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system.
6) All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be
shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush
lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be
shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the
lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City.
In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a
flush lens.
7) A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of
way.
8) A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon
completion of grading and utility work.
9) All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building
materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance
of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be
engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City.
10) A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering
Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The
Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other
agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and
Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities.
11) The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer
infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and
all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities.
Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the
proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities.
Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility
of the Applicant.
12) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an
amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care
of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The
Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities
and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified.
13) An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be
presented to the City Engineer for review by the City Attorney and subject to City
Page 9 of 9
Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement
shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit.
14) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering
Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference.
15) Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully
execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public
Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities
associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area.
16) The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance
with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building
and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of
setback flexibility as shown.
2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-
025 for a Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the
submitted plans in the November 3, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission.
3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-025 Site Plan Review
at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should
specifically reference the reasons for denial.
4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-025 for Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road:
a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table.
Public Notice and Comments
Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out
on October 21, 2021. The mailing was sent to neighbors within 500 feet of the subject parcel. No
comments have been received regarding this application as of October 27, 2021.
Deadline for Agency Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 6, 2021.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by December 4, 2021 (60
days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review
period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial
120 days.
Attachments
A. Land Use Application
B. Location Map
C. Site Plans
D. Resolution 2020-045
Page 1 of 3
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Telephone (651) 792-7800
Fax (651) 634-5137
www.cityofardenhills.org
For Office Use Only
Planning Case No. 2-
Submittal Date
Application Completed Date
Accepted by
Receipt Number
Council Decision
Council Decision Date
202 LAND USE APPLICATION
Applicant Information
Applicant:
Address:
Telephone No.: Other:
Fax No.:
Email Address:
Property Information
Property Owner:
Owner Address:
Owner Telephone No. Other:
Address of Property Involved:
Legal Description:
Property ID No.:
Type of Use:
Zone: Property Acreage:
Type of Request
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Fee: $50 +
Escrow: $2,500)
Conditional Use or Interim Use Permit/CUP or IUP
Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500)
Preliminary Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500)
Final Plat (Fee: $50 + Escrow: $1,00)
Concept Plan Review (Fee: $0 + Escrow:
$0)Master Planned Unit Development or Master SpecialDevelopment Plan (Fee: $00 + Escrow: $2,500)
Final Planned Unit Development or Final SpecialDevelopment Plan (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $,00)
Planned Unit Development Amendment or SpecialDevelopment Plan Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow:$1,500)
Site Plan Review (Fee: $40 + Escrow: $1,500)
Rezoning or TCAAP Regulating Plan Amendment(Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500)
Zoning Code or TCAAP Redevelopment CodeAmendment (Fee: $00 + Escrow: $1,500)
City Code Amendment (Fee: $350 + Escrow:$1,500)
Lot Split/Minor Subdivision (R-1 and R-2 Districts
Only) (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,00)Variance or Permitted Adjustment (Fee: $350 +Escrow: $1,000)
Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way (Fee: $150 +Escrow: $1,000)
Appeal of Administrative Decision (Fee: $150 +Escrow: $1,000)
Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified (Fee:$150 + Escrow: $1,000
Scannell Properties #486, LLC
8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240
317-843-5957
4200 Round Lake Rd, Arden Hills, MN 55112
Lot 1, Block 1 of Gateway Interstate
Parking
x
Scannell Properties #486, LLC (c/o Dan Salzer)
8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240
763-331-8854
dans@scannellproperties.com
213023310034
21.94 Acres
Attachment A
Page 2 of 3
Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaining the project):
Filing & Information Requirements
The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application
process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified
survey of the property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional application requirements can be
found at www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications.
Complete/Incomplete Applications
Under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 15.99, cities have 15 business days to review all plans and application
materials to ensure they satisfy City requirements. During the 15 day review period, planning staff will provide
written comments on the application and may request plan revisions. If the application is determined to be
complete, Minnesota State Statute then requires the City to approve or deny the application within 60 days, up
to 120 days. If not complete, the City may require plan revisions and/or additional information before the
application is scheduled for Planning Commission review and/or City Council action. Project will not be
scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner.
Payment of Fees and Escrows
The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed
complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. The applicant is responsible for all costs
incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Each separate land use request shall be
charged a separate administrative fee and escrow even if submitted on the same application. Costs expended in
reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City.
Charges to the escrow may include planning and engineering staff time, City Attorney and consulting fees, and
mailing costs. If, at any time, a required cash escrow is depleted to less than 20 percent of its original amount,
the applicant shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. The City may
withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all fees
have been paid. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of
an approved plan. The escrow may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis.
Notice of Meeting Attendance
In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a
designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the
next available agenda.
*IMPORTANT*
x Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed
District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398-3070 for additional information.
x The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that
may be required upon approval of a land use application.
x All applications will be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of consultant costs
associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of application in the form of an
escrow to the City.
A tenant has been identified with a larger number of employees than
anticipated during the original Gateway Interstate Site Plan. This
additional parking was reviewed conceptually in conjunction with the
original site plan application and will support this tenants needs.
(please also include a typed, detailed letter
Page 3 of 3
Meeting Schedule
Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday of each month at
6:30 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held
typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City
of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. The schedules
below are for reference purposes only. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application
submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner.
20 Planning Commission and City Council Schedule (*subject to change)
TENTATIVE
PLANNING
COMMISSION
MEETING DATE*
(Generally held on the
first Wednesday after the first
Monday at 6:30 p.m.)
TENTATIVE
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
DATE*
(Generally held on the
fourth Monday at 7:00 p.m.)
January January
February February 2
March March
April April 2
May May 2
June June 2
July July 2
August August 2
September September 2
October October 2
November November 2
December January 1 (202)
January (202) January 2 (202)
Acknowledgement and Signature
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this
application are complete and accurate per city code and ordinance requirements. I fully understand that I am
responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application.
__________________________________________________ ________________
Property Owner Signature (Required) Date
________________________________________________ ________________
Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date
Please contact the City Planner at 651-792-7800
if you have any questions regarding this application.
Additional copies of this application form are available on the City’s website: www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications
10/4/2021
/RFDWLRQ0DS
7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW
3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\
7D[3DUFHOV
&LWLHV
&RXQW\2IILFHV
30
PL
NP
5DPVH\&RXQW\
5DPVH\&RXQW\01
$WWDFKPHQW%
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35
WGATEWAY BLVD.74.8'127.9'263.7'94.4'205.0'76.1'LOT #121.94 AC240.0'275.0'311.0'275.3'240.0'LOT #23.43 ACPROVIDE PERMANENT TYPE 3 BARRICADEWHERE EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKS WEREREMOVED, EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE TOREMAIN FOR SERVICE TO MCES SEWERMETER31.8'18.0'24.0'18.0'10.5'365.0'490.0'365.0'LOT #23.43 ACGATEWAY BLVD.TEWAY BL74.8'74.8127.9'27.9263.7'263.7T #1#14 AC275.3'275.3240.0'240.031.8'31.818.0'18.024.0'24.018.0'18.010.5'10.5365.0'365.0GY3 5W94.4'94 476.1'76 1LOT21.921.9240.0'240.0275.0'275.0 311.0'311 0490.0'490 0GGTINTERSTATE HIGHWAY ETERSTATI205.0'205 0
365.0'365.0 Y242724202020202020929EXISTING OVERHEADPOWEREXISTING 130' UTILITYEASEMENTEXISTING PONDINGEASEMENT TO BEVACATEDEXISTINGSANITARYSEWEREXISTING 30'SANITARYEASEMENTNOT A PART OF THISREVIEW, REFERENCERESOLUTION NO.2020-045K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg October 28, 2021 - 9:49amSHEETBRJBRJ/LEC/DSS71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114NORTHBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC)BUILDING AREA250,000 SF (22.9% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 SFPREVIOUSLY APPROVED PARKING363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 RATIOPROPOSED PARKING ADDITION 198 STALLSTOTAL PARKING PROPOSED 561 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYGATEWAY INTERSTATETOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC)PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPERVIOUS AREA 11.43 ACPREVIOUSLY APPROVED PERVIOUS AREA 14.79 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 13.05 ACPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 13.17 ACZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGGATEWAY BUSINESSDISTRICTPROPOSED ZONINGGATEWAY BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 03/18/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 26.220 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.16. THERE ARE 1.485 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT1 CITY COMMENTS 10/28/2021 Attachment C
1111892231422932427242020202020209BUILDING250,000 S.F.FFE: 898.50DOCK YARD: 894.50R10.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R10.0'R10.0'R3.0'R3.0'R10.0'R3.0'R4.5'R4.5'R5.0'2323141422229933BUILDINGBUILDDINLGLL250,000 S.F.200FFFE: 898.509DOCK YARD: 894.50D:89450DRRRRRRRRR111100000000.000000000'''''R3.0'R3.0R3.0'R3.0R3.0'R3.01111111188992224242020202020209999999999999999R10.0'R10.0R10.0'R10.0R3.0'R3.0R3.0'R3.0R10.0'R10.0R3.0'R3.0R4.5'R4.5R4.5'R4.5R5.0'R5.0RR272724242020202020202020202020.0'24.0'24.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'13.3'9.0'9.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'49.4'6.1'0BHHHHBBIINOT A PART OF THISREVIEW, REFERENCERESOLUTION NO.2020-045UNDERGROUND 120" PERFORATED CMP WITHSAND FILTRATION, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTVOLUME: 447,500 CFWQVREQ: 81,820 CFWQVPROV: 89,146 CFTOP: 892.9100-YR WSE: 892.64BOTTOM CMP: 882.9BOTTOM SAND: 881.4IIIII28.2'24.0'53.6'40.7'K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\C4-SITE PLAN BLOW UP.dwg October 28, 2021 - 9:50amSHEETBRJBRJ/LEC/DSS71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114NORTHPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 03/18/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 26.220 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.16. THERE ARE 1.485 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.KEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTTIP-OUT GUTTERTRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONTRANSFORMER PADEXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE; LOCATION APPROXIMATE -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDREINSTALLED STREET LIGHT POLE ; COORD. W/ CITY OF ARDEN HILLSEXISTING SIGN; LOCATION APPROXIMATE - CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDREINSTALLED EXISTING SIGNNO PARKING SIGNBOLLARD, TYP.ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVUNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT1 CITY COMMENTS 10/28/2021
ADA ROUTE
ADA ROUTE
ADA ROUTE
ADA ROUT
E
ADA ROUTE
ADA ROUTED
885890890890895895895895895895895900900900900900900905905910910884886886887887887887887888888888889
889889889889891891891892892892893893893894894894894894896896896896896896896897897897897897898898898898898898898899899899899899899901901901901
901901902902902902902902903903903903903
904904904904906906907907908908909909911911900898899DELINEATED WETLAND,TYP.897.82897.52897.52896.65896.46896.40896.23897.80896.95897.25G:897.51898.16898.42896.23896.42G:897.62G:899.47G:899.12G:899.83900.85901.28ME:901.00ME:902.00896.01898.50897.82TW:896.90TW:896.90BW:886.00TW:896.90BW:889.08TW:896.90BW:894.02TW:896.90BW:896.38896.16896.37896.07896.72896.30EOF:896.85896.59T/G:897.76898.18897.81898.09897.51897.51898.10896.60T/G:896.56LP:896.44896.30T:899.62T/G:898.91899.57901.74T:898.12T/G:897.91T:898.42T/G:898.19897.86897.86T/G:896.68T:897.18896.61T/G:896.96T:896.91G:896.42896.99896.93897.30T/G:897.29T/G:897.33T:897.99T:897.78T/G:897.96897.66T/G:898.32T/G:897.52T/G:897.60T:898.24G:897.74T/G:897.82T/G:897.82T:897.82G:898.32T:897.82G:898.32898.10898.43898.44898.41897.92897.92898.43897.55897.55897.55897.55BUILDING250,000 S.F.FFE: 898.50DOCK YARD: 894.50898.42898.42898.50T:896.63T:896.77T:898.32898.42898.50898.50898.00898.10898.50LP:895.76T/G:897.80T/G:898.88T/G:896.59896.54EOF:896.68901.80901.95901.89G:896.94G:901.72885890895900900886887888889891892893894896896896896897897898898899899901901UNDERGROUND 120" PERFORATED CMP WITHSAND FILTRATION, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTVOLUME: 447,500 CFWQVREQ: 81,820 CFWQVPROV: 89,146 CFTOP: 892.9100-YR WSE: 892.64BOTTOM CMP: 882.9BOTTOM SAND: 881.4G:899.99G:900.00G:900.16G:895.77G:896.46G:896.35G:897.11G:896.69ME:895.59ME:895.02890895900891892893894896897898899901106 LF - 24" RCP@ 2.46%OCS-01RE:897.39IE:881.40 EIE:881.40 W12 LF - 24" HDPE@ 0.00%STUB-05IE:881.40 WSTUB-04IE:889.50 S25 LF - 15" HDPE@ 2.00%ST-A2RE:895.28IE:890.00 NST-A1RE:895.00IE:890.00 N25 LF - 15" HDPE@ 2.00%STUB-03IE:889.50 SSTUB-02IE:883.95 E7 LF - 24" HDPE@ 2.00%71 LF - 15" PVC@ 2.00%85 LF - 24" HDPE@ 1.00%STUB-01IE:882.70 E30 LF - 24" HDPE@ 1.00%ST-01RE:896.30IE:883.00 EIE:883.00 W54 LF - 18" HDPE@ 1.00%ST-02RE:896.50IE:883.64 EIE:890.36 NEIE:883.54 WG:898.85G:899.51G:898.14G:896.40TW:894.40BW:893.51TW:894.46BW:887.61TW:895.09BW:890.00TW:895.72BW:895.153.42%2.83%
2.32%2.24%2.36%2.29%3.39%1.88%3.49%3.10%4:14:14:12.50%1.48%2.95%1.50%1.52%4.68%
4.68%
4.24%7.70%2.76%1.50%2.86%4.80%4.72%1.50%
1.50%1.50%1.79%1.76%3.57%2.44%2.43%2.32%1.89%4.74%6.17%
3.09%2.35%2.33%4:14:14:11.84%NOT A PART OF THISREVIEW, REFERENCERESOLUTION NO.2020-045PROPOSED RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE,TW INDICATES FINISHED GRADE AT TOP OF WALL, GRADEDRAINAGE SWALE BEHIND TOP BACK OF WALL, DAYLIGHTSWALE WITH POSITIVE DRAINAGE AS SHOWNBW INDICATES FINISHED GRADE AT BOTTOM OF WALL,BOTTOM FOUNDATION OF WALL TO EXTEND BELOW GRADEPER RETAINING WALL DESIGNER RECOMMENDATIONSINSTALL PLUG ON NEW SANITARY ATCONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARYSTRUCTURE. PLUG MAY BE REMOVED ONCE THESEWER HAS BEEN TESTED, APPROVED BY THEINSPECTOR, AND CLEANED OF DEBRISSSWR 10148" DROP SSWR MHRE:895.97IE:877.56 E286 LF - 6" SCH 40 PVC@ 2.00%72 LF - 6" SCH 40 PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TO EXISTING8" WATERMAIN ATPROPOSED BENDEXIST.33" RCPSTORM SEWEREXIST. 21" RCPSANITARY SEWEREXIST. 12" DIPWATERMAIN" DIPMAINEXIST. COMMUNICATIONSTO BE RELOCATEDEXIST. GAS MAIN TOBE RELOCATEDEXIST. 130' UTILITY EASEMENTEXIST. UTILITY EASEMENT8" DIP WATERMAIN; CONTRACTORTO PROVIDE MINIMUM 8' COVEROVER PROPOSED WATERMAIN, TYP.EXISTING 30' SANITARYEASEMENTPROVIDE 8" GATEVALVE/BOX ON EXWATERMAINPROPOSED LIGHT POLE, SEEMEP PLANS FOR DETIAL.PROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPER RESOLUTION NO. 2020-045SS-648" DROP SSWR MHRE:896.27IE:888.07 EIE:883.27 WST-09RE:896.03IE:884.09 SIE:891.58 EIE:884.09 WK:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\C5-GRADING PLAN BLOW UP.dwg October 06, 2021 - 11:44amSHEETBRJBRJ/LEC/DSS71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114NORTHGRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.6. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.7. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.8. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.10. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.11. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL.12. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.13. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.14. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.15. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.16. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODRETAINING WALL COORDINATION PLAN NOTES1. RETAINING WALL SHOWN IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ACTUAL DETAILS SHALL BE DESIGNED BYTHE CONTRACTOR AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS NECESSARY FORINSTALLATION.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE RETAININGWALL WITH ALL UTILITIES, SPECIFICALLY THE STORM SEWER AND WATERMAINADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED WALL.4. GEOTECHNICAL BORING INFORMATION BASEDON THE REPORT LISTED ON SHEET C100.5. FINISHED ELEVATIONS ON THE GRADING PLAN ARE AS STATED ON THE PLAN WITH THETOP OF WALL SPOTS AND BOTTOM OF WALL SPOTS DENOTING THE FINISHED GRADEELEVATIONS. ACTUAL BOTTOM AND TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATIONS MAY VARYDUE TO MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ACTIVITIES WITH THE WALL REINFORCINGAND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AND WETLAND LIMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORMALL NECESSARY COORDINATION, STAGING, TEMPORARY SHORING, AND SEQUENCINGAT NO EXTRA COST.PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONPROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION TW:0.0BW:0.0PROPOSED BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION LP:0.0PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION T:0.0PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION G:0.0
74.8'127.9'263.7'94.4'205.0'76.1'LOT #121.94 AC240.0'275.0'311.0'275.3'240.0'LOT #23.43 AC31.8'18.0'24.0'18.0'10.5'365.0'490.0'365.0'INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35
WGATEWAY BLVD.1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - TCH1 - SWO*2 - TCH2 - SWO*2 - PFC2 - RDL3 - PFC7 - BHS2 - NWM*6 - KTC3 - QUC+5 - WHP2 - RDO*3 - SCP*2 - FFM*3 - RVB+5 - BHS3 - NWM*3 - QUC+3 - RVB+2 - FFM*3 - SCP*2 - RDO*5 - WHP1 - NWM*2 - BHS2 - QUC+3 - AUP1 - ABM3 - RVB+3 - RVB+1 - ABM3 - AUP3 - AUP3 - BHS3 - AUPRETAININGWALL1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+2 - ABM1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDLUNDERGROUND 120" PERFORATED CMP WITHSAND FILTRATION, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTVOLUME: 447,500 CFWQVREQ: 81,820 CFWQVPROV: 89,146 CFTOP: 892.9100-YR WSE: 892.64BOTTOM CMP: 882.9BOTTOM SAND: 881.4AABCDEFLANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)LANDSCAPE LEGENDEDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)SEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)22-11225-13133-26133-26233-36134-17135-22135-24136-21122-112K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg October 06, 2021 - 12:03pmSHEET71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114RAHRAH/ BPSNORTH
LOT #121.94 ACPROPOSED B612 CURB ANDGUTTER (TYP.)PROPOSED STANDARDDUTY ASPHALT1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - SWO*2 - TCH2 - SWO*2 - PFC2 - RDL3 - PFC6 - KTC3 - BFJ12 - KFG4 - RGD4 - BFJ27 - AJS6 - NWS5 - SOS6 - NWS4 - RGD8 - BJB5 - GGD3 - CNM3 - NYW19 - PCA9 - BJB3 - GOJ3 - GOJ3 - GOJ2,724 sf - SOD727 sf - SOD265 sf - SOD9,630 sf - SOD13,606 sf - 35-241134,347 sf - 35-2413 - GOJ105 - AJSRETAININGWALLBBCDDD35-24135-241DBB35-24125-13125-1311 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+2 - ABM1 - RDL14 - BFJ42 - DBH28 - DBH10 - BLC14 - BFJ35-24135-24135-241DDDDD25-1311 - RVB+72 - PDS1 - RDL15 - BJB15 - BJB49 - KFGLOT #121.94 AC1 - RVB+RVVB+1RRVBB1 - RVB+1RVVB1RRVB+- RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+12 - RDL2RDDL2RRDL3 -PFC3 - 27 - AJS6 - NWS6NWS5 - SOS6 - NWS4 - RGD8 - BJB5 - GGD53 - CNM3 - NYW19 - PCAGOJ3 - GOJ3 - GOJJ9,630 sf - SOD60fO3SO,606 sf - 35-24103265-3 - GOJBBCC- RVB+RVVB+RRVB1 -1RVB+RVVB++1-1-RVB+1RVVB+VB1 - RDLRDDL1RRDLLRRRRR1 - RDL1RDDL1RDLL--1 -1 - RDLRDDL1RRDLL- KTCKTTCKTC6 -63 - BFJ3F12 - KFGFFGFG4 - RGD4 - BFJ4-F9 - BJB3 - G24 sf - SOD2,727 sf - SODsSD7272265 sf - SOD6SDfff133- AJSAS105 - 0RETAININGWALLBBDDDDDD35 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24152415241DD35 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24124124125 13125 13125 13125 13125-13125-13125-13125-13125 13125 13125 13125 13125 13125 13125 13125 131513151311 - RVB+ - RVB+1 - RVB+ - RVB+1-RVB+-RVB+2 - ABM2 - ABMDD1 - RVB+ - RVB+-GPROPOSED B612 CURB ANDURB ANDGUTTER (TYP.)TTER (TYPPROPOSED STANDARDTANDARDUTY ASPHALTTY ASP2 -SWO*2SWWWO35 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24152415241BB42 - DBH42 - DBH28 - DBH28 - DBH10 - BLC10 - BLC35 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24152415241DD15 - BJB15 - BJB15 - BJB15 - BJB49 - KFG49 - KFGBB1 - RDL1 - RDL14 - BFJ14 - BFJ14 - BFJ14 - BFJ35 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24124124135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135-24135-24135-24135-24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24135 24152415241DDDDDD72 - PDS72 - PDS1 - RDL1-RDLLANDSCAPE LEGENDEDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)AABCDEFLANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)SEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)22-11225-13133-26133-26233-36134-17135-22135-24136-21122-112K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN BLOW UP.dwg October 06, 2021 - 12:03pmSHEET71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114RAHRAH/ BPSNORTH
CONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEAUP 12 PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE B & B 6` HT.BHS 17 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA` BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT.SCP* 6 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE B & B 12` HT.WHP 10 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 6` HT.ORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEPFC 5 MALUS X `PRAIRIFIRE` PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLE B & B 2.5" CAL.QUA 5 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN B & B 2.5" CAL.QUC+ 8 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN CLUMP B & B 8` HT.RVB+ 23 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 8` HT.TCH 7 CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS TM THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN B & B 2.5" CAL.OVERSTORY TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEABM 9 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE` AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL.FFM* 4 ACER SACCHARUM `FALL FIESTA` SUGAR MAPLE B & B 4.5" CAL.KTC 6 GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `UMNSYNERGY` KENTUCKY TRUE COFFEETREE B & B 2.5" CAL.NWM* 6 ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD` NORTHWOOD MAPLE B & B 4.5" CAL.RDL 7 TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND` REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL.RDO* 4 QUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK B & B 4.5" CAL.SWO* 3 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 4.5" CAL.ULC 4 ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK` PRAIRIE EXPEDITION ELM B & B 2.5" CAL.CONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBFJ 53 JUNIPERUS SABINA `BUFFALO` BUFFALO JUNIPER #5 CONT. 5` O.C.GOJ 31 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL` GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT. 4` O.C.NYW 15 TAXUS CUSPIDATA `NOVA` NOVA YEW #5 CONT. 3` O.C.SGJ 51 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT. 5` O.C.DECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBLC 18 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` O.C.CSC 69 CORNUS SERICEA `CARDINAL` CARDINAL DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 4` O.C.DBH 123 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. 3` O.C.GGD 8 CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW` GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 5` O.C.GLS 30 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. 4` O.C.NIN 14 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NINEBARK #5 CONT. 5` O.C.RGD 8 CORNUS ALBA SIBIRICA `RED GNOME` RED GNOME DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 4` O.C.SOS 25 AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK` STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` HT.SPN 14 SALIX PURPUREA `NANA` DWARF ARCTIC WILLOW #5 CONT. 4` O.C.PERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGSPACINGAJS 132 SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY` AUTUMN JOY SEDUM #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c.BGT 35 BAPTISIA X `GRAPE TAFFY` GRAPE TAFFY BAPTISIA #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.BJB 175 PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA `BLUE JEAN BABY` BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGE #1 CONT. 36" OC 36" o.c.CNM 6 OSMUNDA CINNAMOMEA CINNAMON FERN #1 CONT. 36" O.C. 36" o.c.KFG 12 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c.KSM 35 ECHINACEA X `TNECHKY` KISMET YELLOW CONEFLOWER #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.MSY 30 ACHILLEA X `MOONSHINE` MOONSHINE YARROW #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.NWS 52 PANICUM VIRGATUM `NORTHWIND` NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.OCT 169 ANDROPOGON GERARDII `RED OCTOBER` RED OCTOBER BIG BLUESTEM 5 GAL 24" O.C. 24" o.c.PCA 19 ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE` PURPLE CANDLES ASTILBE #1 CONT. 36" O.C. 36" o.c.PDS 154 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC 24" o.c.PSG 115 PANICUM VIRGATUM `SHENANDOAH` SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 24" o.c.PLANT SCHEDULEK:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN BLOW UP.dwg October 06, 2021 - 12:03pmSHEET71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114RAHRAH/ BPSDOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHNOTES:2X ROOT BALL WIDTHSOD4" TOPSOILPREPARED PLANTING BED ANDBACKFILL SOIL(THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES:1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT.3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECTAND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEMGIRDLING ROOTS.4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILLVOIDS.6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESSSOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST.1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ORTHOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL.INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UPTO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAPAND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6"INTERVALS.5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THETOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT.REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOPTWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROMTHE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE.REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS.6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TOSETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER.PLANTING SOILON CENTER SPACINGAS STATED ON PLAN.EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTHA MINIMUM OF 6" BEYONDTHE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.FINISHED GRADEEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDTREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1021SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.31/2"FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER.LAWN SIDE"BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BYVALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO.USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USEKNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDEANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHORSTAKES AT 48" O.C., AND ATCHANGES.EACH END.PLASTIC DIVIDER:FINISHED GRADE ATSHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOPOF DIVIDER.PLANTING BED1"POLY EDGER DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1024SPADED EDGE DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1026MULCH AT PLANTING AREASPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH,4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWNSIDELAWN GRASSFINISHED GRADEBUILDING, EXTERIOR WALLPROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGEAWAY FROM BUILDINGSPECIFIED ROCK MULCH1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIPEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDSOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUMOF 4" BELOW EDGING TOPTO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATELIP FOR MULCH.SPECIFIED SOIL MIXFINISH GRADE FOR LAWNMAINTENANCE STRIP DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L10254"1"NOTE:1. EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPEEQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLEDIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE INHEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREASOF POOR DRAINAGE.STEEP SLOPE PLANTINGSCALE: N.T.S.L1022EXISTING GRADECUT AREAPLANT ACCORDING TOPLANTING DETAILSAPPLICABLE AS SHOWNBACKFILL AREA1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TOVERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTSOR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOSUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THEGUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONEYEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADESHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTHRATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-INMATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THETOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVEDDOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THEROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAKAPART PEAT POTS.12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POORBRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONEYEAR.15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIORTO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THENEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECTTOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGERTHAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE,SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUBPLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS.PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED DARKWALNUT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, ATMINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADEFILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS(WHERE APPLICABLE).18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGINGOR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES ANDSTAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEADAT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKSFOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TOCREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BESTANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALLTOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 ORGREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOTINDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMALPROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRSTYEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR.ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR.21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANTIS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDEWATER FOR CONTRACTOR.22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARDAREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.LANDSCAPE NOTESNOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANTQUANTITIES PER PLAN AND FIELD CONDITIONS.
*DWHZD\,QWHUVWDWH*DWHZD\%OYG$UGHQ+LOOV01'HVLJQHU$PEHU)RUHVWHU'DWH6FDOH1RWWR6FDOH'UDZLQJ1R/6XPPDU\/LJKWLQJ&DOFXODWLRQVRI %%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
&&#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
%%#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
$$#
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
Attachment D