The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-22-21-RAPPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES STAFF COMMENTS APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 25, 2021 Regular City Council 10 -25 -21 -R.PDF November 1, 2021 Special City Council 11 -01 -21 -SR.PDF November 8, 2021 Special City Council Work Session 11 -08 -21 -SWS.PDF November 8, 2021 Special City Council 11 -08 -21 -SR.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -064 Accepting The Liability Coverage Limits From The League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) For 2022 Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -065 Accepting Donations From Arden Hills Foundation Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement For Reconstruction Design And Construction Administration Services –HR Green –Arden Manor Park (CDBG) And Floral Park Hardcourt Improvements David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Building Official Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion Authorizing The City Administrator To Purchase Recycling Carts Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS Resolution 2021 -066 –Site Plan Review –4200 Round Lake Road (Scannell Properties) –PC 21 -025 Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION 2021 -066 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR 4200 ROUND LAKE ROAD.PDF ATTACHMENT B - LAND USE APPLICATION.PDF ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP.PDF ATTACHMENT D - SITE PLANS.PDF ATTACHMENT E - LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE.PDF ATTACHMENT F - ENGINEER MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT G - EXECUTED RESOLUTION 2020 -045.PDF ATTACHMENT H - PC MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT I - DRAFT PC 110321 MINUTES.PDF ATTACHMENT J - CC - PC 21 -025 PRESENTATION.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Dave McClung Steve Scott Regular City Council Agenda November 22, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 5.D. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESOctober 25, 2021 Regular City Council 10 -25 -21 -R.PDF November 1, 2021 Special City Council 11 -01 -21 -SR.PDF November 8, 2021 Special City Council Work Session 11 -08 -21 -SWS.PDF November 8, 2021 Special City Council 11 -08 -21 -SR.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -064 Accepting The Liability Coverage Limits From The League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) For 2022 Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2021 -065 Accepting Donations From Arden Hills Foundation Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement For Reconstruction Design And Construction Administration Services –HR Green –Arden Manor Park (CDBG) And Floral Park Hardcourt Improvements David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Building Official Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion Authorizing The City Administrator To Purchase Recycling Carts Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS Resolution 2021 -066 –Site Plan Review –4200 Round Lake Road (Scannell Properties) –PC 21 -025 Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION 2021 -066 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR 4200 ROUND LAKE ROAD.PDF ATTACHMENT B - LAND USE APPLICATION.PDF ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP.PDF ATTACHMENT D - SITE PLANS.PDF ATTACHMENT E - LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE.PDF ATTACHMENT F - ENGINEER MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT G - EXECUTED RESOLUTION 2020 -045.PDF ATTACHMENT H - PC MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT I - DRAFT PC 110321 MINUTES.PDF ATTACHMENT J - CC - PC 21 -025 PRESENTATION.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaNovember 22, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 5.D. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESOctober 25, 2021 Regular City Council10-25 -21 -R.PDFNovember 1, 2021 Special City Council11-01 -21 -SR.PDFNovember 8, 2021 Special City Council Work Session11-08 -21 -SWS.PDFNovember 8, 2021 Special City Council11-08 -21 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -064 Accepting The Liability Coverage Limits From The League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) For 2022Gayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -065 Accepting Donations From Arden Hills FoundationJoe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Professional Services Agreement For Reconstruction Design And Construction Administration Services –HR Green –Arden Manor Park (CDBG) And Floral Park Hardcourt Improvements David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Appointment Of Building Official Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion Authorizing The City Administrator To Purchase Recycling Carts Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS Resolution 2021 -066 –Site Plan Review –4200 Round Lake Road (Scannell Properties) –PC 21 -025 Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION 2021 -066 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR 4200 ROUND LAKE ROAD.PDF ATTACHMENT B - LAND USE APPLICATION.PDF ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP.PDF ATTACHMENT D - SITE PLANS.PDF ATTACHMENT E - LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE.PDF ATTACHMENT F - ENGINEER MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT G - EXECUTED RESOLUTION 2020 -045.PDF ATTACHMENT H - PC MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT I - DRAFT PC 110321 MINUTES.PDF ATTACHMENT J - CC - PC 21 -025 PRESENTATION.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaNovember 22, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items not currently on the agenda which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESOctober 25, 2021 Regular City Council10-25 -21 -R.PDFNovember 1, 2021 Special City Council11-01 -21 -SR.PDFNovember 8, 2021 Special City Council Work Session11-08 -21 -SWS.PDFNovember 8, 2021 Special City Council11-08 -21 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -064 Accepting The Liability Coverage Limits From The League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) For 2022Gayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2021 -065 Accepting Donations From Arden Hills FoundationJoe Vaughan, Recreation ProgrammerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Professional Services Agreement For Reconstruction Design And Construction Administration Services –HR Green –Arden Manor Park (CDBG) And Floral Park Hardcourt Improvements David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Appointment Of Building OfficialDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion Authorizing The City Administrator To Purchase Recycling CartsDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSNEW BUSINESSResolution 2021 -066 –Site Plan Review –4200 Round Lake Road (Scannell Properties) –PC 21 -025Jessica Jagoe, City PlannerMEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION 2021 -066 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR 4200 ROUND LAKE ROAD.PDF ATTACHMENT B - LAND USE APPLICATION.PDF ATTACHMENT C - LOCATION MAP.PDF ATTACHMENT D - SITE PLANS.PDF ATTACHMENT E - LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE.PDF ATTACHMENT F - ENGINEER MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT G - EXECUTED RESOLUTION 2020 -045.PDF ATTACHMENT H - PC MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT I - DRAFT PC 110321 MINUTES.PDF ATTACHMENT J - CC - PC 21 -025 PRESENTATION.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesDave McClungSteve Scott Regular City Council AgendaNovember 22, 2021 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:5.D.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:7.8.9.9.A.Documents: 10. 11. Approved: November 22, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 25, 2021 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and Steve Scott Absent: Councilmember Dave McClung (excused) Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Public Works Director Dave Swearingen; Senior Planner Jessica Jagoe; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; and City Attorney Joel Jamnik PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. The motion carried (4-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES A. Public Inquiry Response from October 11, 2021 City Council Meeting City Attorney Jamnik provided a response to the comments that were made at the October 11 Council meeting, a resident inquired as to what the Council’s position was on increased density and affordability on the TCAAP site. The Council is still bound to not discuss or disclose the substance of its negotiations and positions exchanged with Ramsey County during the litigation brought by Ramsey County against the City ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 2 which recently concluded, but the Council remains committed to supporting the redevelopment to achieve the same goals it established in January of 2016: the City seeks to have the development provide a true mixed-use village of office, manufacturing, retail space and housing for the area that provides new tax revenues, a diverse blend of land uses, high wage jobs, and the efficient delivery of public and private services that will enhance but remain complementary to existing development within the City. In regards to affordability, the City recognizes the need for affordable and life cycle housing with a particular focus on young professionals, move up housing, and senior citizens. It is important to note that the City itself does NOT regulate affordable housing, in-fact the City is not standing in the way of increased affordability on the site, but it cannot divert funds from every-day operations, like police and fire protection or road maintenance to pay for additional affordable housing. The County and/or Master Developer may seek outside funding sources to make TCAAP more affordable. This would be above and beyond the affordability measures already built in to TCAAP as part of the City’s goals established back in 2016. For density, the City’s current land use and comprehensive plan contemplate a maximum of 1,460 residential units at an overall average density of no greater than 9.46 units per acre. That density is roughly three times greater than the current city average density, and unlike other developments identified that have a broader grid network of streets for access and readily available public transportation, Rice Creek Commons is dependent on a single spine road with two primary ingress and egress points north and south for its transportation needs and is planned for a higher concentration of office, manufacturing, commercial and retail uses than those other developments. The planned level of density aims to keep TCAAP a viable, long-term investment for the region, while not overbuilding to the point of creating more problems for the local infrastructure, such as, extreme traffic congestion. Times have changed, and the needs and constraints of the existing and future residents of the City will also change as the project progresses, which is why the City is committed to continue its discussions with the Master Developer and the County through the established Joint Development Authority to review the changing dynamics. But that can’t happen unless and until the County recommits to the previously agreed to process. In the absence of an open and transparent process, the public will be left to wonder. 4. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS A. Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project Update Steve Weser, Alliant Engineering, Inc., provided the Council with a presentation on the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project. He noted there would be a full reconstruction of Lexington Avenue from I-694 to County Road E with some signal and median work being done. The project would be led by Ramsey County with partnerships from Shoreview, Arden Hills, MNDOT and adjacent residents and businesses. The purpose for this project would be replace aging infrastructure, to update utilities, improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities and to provide safety improvements. The proposed timeline and staging for the project was reviewed with the Council. He commented on the public engagement that occurred which included a series of open ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 3 houses. Further comment was provided regarding intersection improvements that would be made through the project and information was provided on how the project would be funded. Councilmember Holden requested further information regarding the regional trail. She questioned how wide the sidewalk would be. Mr. Weser explained the County was studying a regional trail through this area because the roadway was being reconstructed. He reported this may or may not be a regional trail in the future. He anticipated the sidewalk would be six feet wide. Joey Lundquist, Ramsey County Project Manager, stated she was new to the County. She understood there was a parks and trails group with the County that was deciding which trails were on certain sides of the street. Councilmember Holden questioned how long northbound Lexington Avenue would be closed. She reported this was the only route Arden Hills residents can use to access eastbound I-694. She requested one lane remain open to allow for access to I-694 east. Mr. Weser stated due to the pavement improvements needed near the railroad a full road closure was needed. He anticipated the road closure would be for two weeks. Mayor Grant discussed how traffic would have to be rerouted in order to allow residents to get to I-694. Councilmember Holmes indicated this was the third major road project that has been completed on Lexington Avenue in the last 10 years. She questioned why these projects can’t be more coordinated. Ms. Lundquist commented she was not aware of the history but noted some projects may have been completed for utilities while others were minor resurfacing. She explained the proposed project was quite major. Councilmember Holmes discussed how disruptive these projects were for Arden Hills residents and business owners. She encouraged the County to pool its funding in the future in order to limit the number of projects in the future. Councilmember Holden feared that local businesses would be further impacted by the proposed road closures. Ms. Lundquist encouraged local business owners to attend an upcoming open house in order to understand how traffic would be routed through the project so they can let their patrons know how to get to their business. Mayor Grant asked if the County would be taking comments from local businesses at the upcoming open house. Ms. Lundquist commented mostly the County has been providing information on the project. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 4 Mayor Grant noted there was a big difference between this is what we are going to do and this is how the project is going to be staged. He encouraged the County to be receptive to these types of comments and concerns from local business owners. He requested the cross connect to Shoreview be inspected during this project. Public Works Director Swearingen explained the cross connect would be replaced during this project. B. Recognition of Senator Jason Isaacson and Representative Kelly Moller – Lexington Avenue Watermain Project Mayor Grant recognized Senator Jason Isaacson and Representative Kelly Moller for their work on assisting the City with the Lexington Avenue Watermain Project. He thanked Senator Isaacson and Representative Moller for advocating on behalf of the City of Arden Hills and presented each of them with a Certificate of Appreciation. Senator Jason Isaacson (attending via Zoom) thanked the City for this recognition and stated he was always happy to be of service to the City of Arden Hills. He commented further on the issues he would be advocating for on behalf of the City. Representative Kelly Moller (attending via Zoom) thanked the City for this certificate and explained she enjoyed working with the City and Senator Isaacson on this project. She indicated she was looking forward to the end results from this project. She discussed the upcoming bonding requests that have been made by Arden Hills and noted she was working to get sidewalks around the Mounds View High School. She stated she appreciated seeing several members of the Council at the New Perspective Senior Living ground breaking ceremony and commented she was looking forward to this project progressing in the community. 5. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director Swearingen reported the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project was completed. He recommended the Transportation Update item from the agenda be removed until next spring. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-055 Authorizing the City to Apply for a Grant from the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA) – Lexington Avenue Watermain Project ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 5 C. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-056 Designating Polling Places for the 2022 General Election D. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-057 Accepting Donation from Arden Hills Foundation E. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2021-010 Replacing Chapter 3, Section 380 – Local Lodging Tax, and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance F. Motion to Approve Appointment of City Planner G. Motion to Approve Recruitment of Senior Planner H. Motion to Approve 2022 Recycling Contract Extension with Republic Services I. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-058 Authorizing Application for Recycling SCORE Grant Funds from Ramsey County for 2022 J. Motion to Approve Termination of Abatement Agreement for Land O’Lakes Expansion Project K. Motion to Approve 2021 3rd Quarter Financials L. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-059 Denying a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review for 3737 Lexington Avenue N and 1133 Grey Fox Road (Aldi) – Planning Case 21-019 M. Motion to Approve Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement – Bethel University – Planning Case 21-020 N. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-060 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids – Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project O. Motion to Approve Payment No. 1 and Change Orders No. 1, 2 and 3 – Karth Lake Runoff Control Project P. Motion to Authorize City Hall Cleaning Services Agreement Q. Motion to Approve Appointment of Communications Coordinator MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (4-0). 8. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning Case 21-024 – Zoning Code Amendment – Chapter 13, Sections 1320.06 and 1325.05 (B-2 and B-3 Districts) Senior Planner Jagoe explained starting in 2018, the City Council began discussions on possible amendments with regards to the design standards and placement of buildings for the B-2 Zoning District. The B-2 District generally includes the properties along the County Road E corridor between Highway 51 and Lexington Avenue North. The district is a mix of new and older buildings and primarily retail, service, and office uses. For new development in this district, the Zoning Code identifies design standards that regulate placement of the building and parking areas. The City Council’s initial review involved discussions on the front yard setback in business ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 6 districts and consideration for amending the language from 20 feet to 50 feet to be consistent with the B-3 District. In addition, the Council reviewed removal of two parking setback requirements that would allow a Developer more flexibility in the placement of buildings and parking areas in the B-2 District. Senior Planner Jagoe stated from this initial work session, the City Council also identified additional concerns with building façade requirements. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council held two more work sessions whereby providing feedback and direction to staff on revisions for consideration in the B-2 District. The Council requested staff review the transparency requirements for commercial developments as well as the use of other types of coating on glass as a means of complying with ordinance requirements. Senior Planner Jagoe reported at the work session meeting on December 21, 2020, the City Council discussed the Staff suggested amendments regarding front yard setback and removal of design standard language in order to allow more flexibility in placement of the buildings in B-2 District. The consensus was to remove a sentence within Commercial Façade Transparency, Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F.1 that allowed discretion for waiving the transparency requirements. The rational was that this flexibility already exists through the Planned Unit Development review and a Developer could suggest alternate considerations. For façade transparency, the City will continue to require 50% of all first level building facades that front a public street to be comprised of transparent windows or doors. The language to be removed was a second requirement of 20% for all facades that are reasonably visible from the right-of-way. With the language amendments to the building and parking setbacks it is anticipated that there will be fewer issues on design challenges with building orientation and the back side of a building facing the public street. The proposed changes still ensures that the appearance of blank walls would not face the street. Following the discussion, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance amendments to the Planning Commission and to hold a public hearing which was completed on October 6th. Senior Planner Jagoe explained the proposed ordinance language from Section 1325.05, Subd. 8 applies to New Development, Redevelopment, and Modifications to Existing Sites in the B-2 and B-3 District. The City Council has identified that a further review of the B-3 District standards may be forthcoming. However, priority has been given to removal of outdated language and modifying language with an emphasis pertinent to the B-2 District. Staff commented further on the proposed zoning code amendment and recommended the Council hold a public hearing. Councilmember Holden asked if these standards would apply if it was not a PUD. Senior Planner Jagoe explained a property within the B-2 District would have to comply to the proposed standards and noted that a PUD would allow that flexibility. Councilmember Holden questioned if back lit Spandrel glass could be requested through flexibility. Senior Planner Jagoe reported this was the case. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 7 With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. B. Planning Case – 21-021 – Minor Subdivision – 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue Senior Planner Jagoe stated the Minor Subdivision has been requested to allow for the alteration of the property line between the subject properties. Currently, the two properties have joint access to a driveway that crosses the shared property line. The Applicants are requesting the Minor Subdivision to alter the property line to include all of the shared driveway. This would involve adding 796 square feet (excluding ROW) of property to Subject Property A, owned by the Applicants. Staff commented further on the request and recommended the Council hold a public hearing. Councilmember Holden stated she would be requesting Conditions 1 and 2 be pulled because these have never been required from other applicants. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. 10. NEW BUSINESS A. Ordinance 2021-011 Amending Chapter 13, Sections 1320.06 and 1325.05 of the Arden Hills City Code (B-2 and B-3 Districts) and Authorizing Publication of Summary Ordinance – Planning Case 21-024 Senior Planner Jagoe stated the City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 21-024 under Agenda Item 9A. A full evaluation of the proposed amendment and supporting attachments are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 9A. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance 2021-0011 and authorization to publish summary ordinance for Planning Case 21-024 an application for an amendment to the language in Chapter 13, Section 1320.06 and 1325.05 of the Arden Hills City Code to amend and strike language in the B-2, General Business District and B-3, Service Business District regarding design standards for building façade and setback requirements relative to front yard and parking areas. Councilmember Holmes explained the City has heard from some developers that they like back facing buildings. She questioned if parking could be in the middle if requested. Senior Planner Jagoe reported this would be allowed. Councilmember Holmes thanked staff for all of their efforts on this code amendment. The motion carried (4-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 8 B. Resolution 2021-061 – Minor Subdivision – 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue – Planning Case 21-021 Senior Planner Jagoe stated Jill and Greg Casmey, Applicants, have requested a Minor Subdivision to allow for the alteration of the property line between the subject properties. Currently, the two properties have joint access to a driveway that crosses the shared property line. The Applicants are requesting the Minor Subdivision to alter the property line to include all of the shared driveway. This would involve adding 796 square feet (excluding ROW) of property to Subject Property A, owned by the Applicants. The City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 21-021 under Agenda Item 9B. A full evaluation of the proposed Minor Subdivision and supporting attachments are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 9B. It was noted the Planning Commission reviewed this request and recommended approval with three conditions. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2021-061 approving a Minor Subdivision between the properties located at 3300 New Brighton Road and 1893 Beckman Avenue that would be a lot line adjustment along New Brighton Road to reconfigure the side yard between the two existing properties striking Conditions 1 and 2. The motion carried (4-0). C. Resolution 2021-062 Ordering Nuisance Abatement – 1465 Floral Drive Senior Planner Jagoe stated due to a complaint, staff inspected the property at 1465 Floral Drive on August 17, 2021. Staff noted excessive vegetation growth in the rear yard and determined the property was in violation of the following subsection of City Code Section 602.02 Public Nuisance Affecting Health: • Subd. 6. All noxious weeds and other growths of vegetation upon public or private property in excess of eight (8) inches. Senior Planner Jagoe commented following the initial inspection, Staff sent a letter to the Property Owner at their address shown in Ramsey County Property Records requesting they correct the issue by August 31, 2021. A follow-up inspection on September 13, 2021, revealed the violation had not been corrected. As a result, Staff prepared a second notice on September 13, 2021 that outlined further abatement action may be taken if the violation was not corrected. On September 27, 2021, a third inspection was completed and Staff deemed the rear yard of the property still to be in violation. Senior Planner Jagoe reported in accordance with the City’s abatement procedures in Section 602.05 of the City Code, a certified letter was mailed to the Property Owner of record on October 6, 2021. In addition, Staff posted notice on the property and sent a letter via first class mail. Based on the abatement procedures, the Property Owner was given until October 17, 2021 to abate the nuisance. Further investigation by Staff discovered a different out of State mailing address in Maryland was listed in the City’s utility billing records. A second abatement notice was sent certified mail on October 12, 2021 to this alternate address with a new deadline of October 19, 2021 to correct the violation. Both final abatement notices identified that if corrective action was ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 9 not taken by the stated deadline, the City Council would hold a hearing on October 25, 2021, to order the abatement of the above described nuisance. A follow-up inspection was completed on October 20th and showed that no action has been taken in the rear yard. Senior Planner Jagoe explained staff has included as part of this report the 2017-2020 aerial maps from Ramsey County GIS that show this area in the rear yard along Royal Lane had been previously maintained. An abatement order allows the City to hire a contractor to complete the work on the property and charge the cost back to the property owner. The charge is 125 percent of the cost of the work including administrative costs. If the charges are not paid, the charge will be certified against the property for collection with the property taxes. Staff is requesting the City Council issue an order for abatement of the property. Councilmember Holden asked if this was a lot previously maintained by the City. Councilmember Holmes explained this was not a lot that was maintained by the City. Councilmember Scott noted he viewed this lot on the Ramsey County interactive map and noted this was a larger two acre lot that was private property. He commented adjacent lot at 1423 Floral Drive was part of Floral Park. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2021-062 ordering nuisance abatement at 1465 Floral Drive W. for excessive vegetation growth not in compliance with City regulations. The motion carried (4-0). 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Scott thanked Senator Isaacson and Representative Moller for continuing to be staunch advocates for the City and its residents. Councilmember Scott thanked the Arden Hills Foundation for their donation to the City. Councilmember Scott congratulated Jessica Jagoe for her promotion to the position of City Planner. Councilmember Scott welcomed Grace Arel as the City’s new Communications Coordinator. Councilmember Scott encouraged all residents to get out and vote in the upcoming election. Councilmember Scott commented he signed up for the City’s new Ion Water Application which was an interactive app that allows residents to track their daily water consumption. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 10 Councilmember Holmes stated on Wednesday, October 13 she attended the New Perspective Senior Living groundbreaking ceremony with the Mayor and Representative Moller. Councilmember Holmes congratulated Jessica Jagoe for her promotion to the position of City Planner. Councilmember Holmes commented on Saturday, October 23 she attended a Zoom discussion with County Commissioner Nicole Fretham where Ramsey County park hours were discussed. She reported there would be another Zoom meeting on this topic on Tuesday, October 26 at 6:30 p.m. Councilmember Holmes reported on Wednesday, October 20 she attended a neighborhood meeting for the Snelling Avenue trail. She noted this event was well attended and the residents were pleased to be able look at the plans and be able to provide feedback. Councilmember Holden questioned when the State of the City event would be held. Mayor Grant stated the State of the City event would be provided in a recorded format this year due to COVID. He explained information regarding this came out in the Arden Hills Notes. Mayor Grant thanked the Arden Hills Foundation for their donation to the City’s parks. Mayor Grant congratulated Jessica Jagoe for her promotion to the position of City Planner. He also congratulated Grace Arel for being named the City’s Communications Coordinator. Mayor Grant encouraged the public to get out and vote in the upcoming election and encouraged staff to provide the election judges with food. Mayor Grant noted he also signed up for the Eye On Water App. He stated it was easy to sign up, residents could monitor their water usage and residents would receive an email if their property had a water leak. Mayor Grant commented on the New Perspectives groundbreaking ceremony and stated he appreciated how this organization put people first in everything they do. Mayor Grant indicated he attended a PTRC meeting last week where the group discussed their 2022 work plan. Mayor Grant reported the Karth Lake Board would be meeting on Tuesday, October 26 and noted he would be in attendance at this meeting. Mayor Grant stated he attended the Snelling Avenue neighborhood meeting last Wednesday, which was well attended. He explained Bolton & Menk answered questions at this meeting and residents were able to express their concerns with the project. Public Works Director Swearingen reported the City also took virtual comments from the public regarding the Snelling Avenue neighborhood project and these comments were being ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – OCTOBER 25, 2021 11 compiled by Bolton & Menk. He stated he would get the results to the Council as soon as possible. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried (4-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:41 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: November 22, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 1, 2021 5:45 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the Special City Council meeting at 5:45 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung (attending via Zoom), and Steve Scott (arrived at 5:51 p.m.) Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (4-0). 2. NEW BUSINESS A. Joint Powers Agreement for the Lake Johanna Fire Department Headquarters Councilmember McClung stated the City Council discussed the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) at its October work session and directed staff to bring forward a final document for approval. The JPA sets forth a board comprised of members of the City Council from Arden Hills, North Oaks, and Shoreview to oversee station construction and financing of a future Lake Johanna Fire department (LJFD) headquarters. This JPA is a culmination of a lot of work between the three cities and the fire department, and is the next step in moving the station to fruition. Councilmember McClung explained this process began in 2018 when the department underwent a needs study and assessed its needs over the next fifty years. The study identified shortcomings with its current station model, and recommended disposing of Station 4 on Victoria Avenue and ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL – NOVEMBER 1, 2021 2 constructing a new headquarters in Arden Hills between Lexington Avenue and Highway 51 along County Road E. At the direction of the three cities, the fire department began researching potential locations and noted significant open space at the Anderson Center Property on Pine Tree Drive. Following negotiations, the fire department was able to acquire a portion of land for a future fire station. With the land acquired, the fire department is undergoing the design process for the fire station, and will eventually seek approval from the three cities to move forward. There is no timeline for construction of the new station, but it does have a deadline to start construction no later than June 30, 2026. He commented further on how this station would be in the best interest of all three communities and encouraged the Council to offer their support. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Joint Powers Agreement for the Lake Johanna Fire Department Headquarters. Councilmember Holden thanked Councilmember McClung for his summary on this item. Mayor Grant concurred. Councilmember Scott discussed how this fire station would enhance the safety of the community while also providing much needed training space for the department’s firefighters. Councilmember McClung agreed this new station would be a win-win-win for all three cities within the JPA in order to provide services for all residents in the service area. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 3. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember McClung reported this was a bittersweet moment for him because he was on hospice after fighting renal failure and amyloidosis for the last year. He thanked the residents of Arden Hills who have supported him over the years and for those who have worked to make life a joy for him. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 6:07 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: November 22, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING NOVEMBER 8, 2021 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung (attending the meeting via Zoom) and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; City Planner Jessica Jagoe; and City Clerk Julie Hanson 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Liquor License and Concept Plan – Northern Lights Bingo City Clerk Hanson stated Northern Lights Bingo (applicant) has submitted the required City and State applications and associated paperwork (background check forms and insurance information) for a new liquor license effective in 2022. The liquor license will be presented to the Council for formal consideration of approval at its regular meeting on December 13, 2021 together with the yearly renewals that are brought forward each year. Because this a new use for this particular site/building, staff is requesting Council direction on proceeding with the liquor license process. It should be noted that staff has consulted with the City Attorney as bingo halls are not a typical location at which a liquor license is pursued. That said, the City Attorney concurred that neither City Code nor State Statute precludes a bingo hall from selling liquor. Based on this, staff is moving this application forward for Council consideration with the caveat that the applicant attain the designation as a restaurant, per City Code. City Clerk Hanson reported City Code, Chapter 5, Section 500.1, states that liquor licenses are issued to restaurants, and restaurants are defined as “an establishment . . . under the control of a single proprietor or manager, where meals are regularly prepared on the premises . . . and having a minimum seating capacity for thirty (30) guests.” Northern Lights Bingo contains an area that is currently licensed with the City as Brightside Café with limited seating. In order to qualify for a ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 8, 2021 2 liquor license, the site must contain a restaurant that can seat at least 30 patrons. In the concept plan submittals provided by the applicant, the proposed restaurant section would have a seating capacity for 32-36 patrons. The City Planner has confirmed the subject property is located in the B-2 General Business District and that restaurants are allowed as permitted uses within this district. Staff commented further on the number of liquor licenses in the City and requested feedback from the Council on how to proceed. Councilmember Scott stated he understood the applicant was requesting to serve food and beverages in the café area. He asked if these items could then be taken into the bingo hall. Julie Standering, the applicant, explained food and beverages would be allowed to be taken into the bingo hall. City Clerk Hanson reported the liquor would not have to be kept in a certain designated area but rather could be brought throughout the entire establishment. Councilmember Holden questioned where the main entrance would be. Ms. Standering reviewed the site plan with the Council and noted where the main entrance was located. She explained the building had one main entrance point. Councilmember Holden inquired if the City could require security. City Clerk Hanson indicated she could look into this further. Mayor Grant asked if the Council supported this liquor license moving forward. Councilmember McClung and Councilmember Holmes supported the liquor license as requested. Councilmember Holden stated she supported the liquor license but asked that staff get back to her regarding her security question. Councilmember Scott explained he supported the liquor license as well. B. City Speed Limit Discussion John Morast, HR Green representative, thanked the Council for considering their proposal regarding the Citywide speed limit on city-streets study. He noted Council was in favor of lowering the speed limit to 25 MPH where applicable. Mayor Grant asked why the proposal included fees that allowed for contact with the City of Shoreview. Mr. Morast explained this would allow him to discuss with Shoreview several signs located along Northbound Lexington Avenue that was a safety concern. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 8, 2021 3 Council consensus was to support the contract with HR Green. C. Snelling Avenue North PMP – Design Decision Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated on September 20, 2021, at the Work Session, Council was presented 3 different design options for the Snelling Avenue North Improvements project. Within the presentation was the project background and information about how each option was designed and the associated costs. Council then directed staff to consider all available design options and host a Public Open House to receive feedback from Arden Hills’ residents. The Public Open House was held on October 20, 2021. Staff also had a virtual opportunity for feedback on the project page on the City website from October 15 to October 24. The comments that were received have been compiled. Staff requested the Council provide staff with feedback on what option to proceed with. Councilmember Holden reported she supported Option 3. Mayor Grant believed Option 3 was the logical choice. Councilmember Scott and Councilmember Holmes supported Option 3 as well. Councilmember McClung explained he also supported Option 3 and recommended the trail be located on the west side. Councilmember Holden indicated she supported the trail being located on the west side as well because this would provide a better connection to the regional trail. Councilmember Holmes questioned if it made a difference which side the trail was on when considering grant funding. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen discussed the trail along Lexington Avenue and commented on how the connectivity was considered when this trail was put in place. Councilmember Holmes stated she believed this portion of trail should be located on the east side because traffic was limited. In addition, the Bethel trail was to the east. She explained she was not convinced the trail had to be on the west side for connectivity purposes. Councilmember Scott indicated the east side was more favorable from an engineering standpoint, but he understood the west side provided a better regional layout. For this reason, he preferred the new trail be located on the west side. Mayor Grant commented he understood there were benefits to having the trail on the east side, however, he recommended the trail be located on the west side. Councilmember Holden stated the County may want to put a roundabout in this area and this was a concern to her given the level of pedestrian traffic in this area. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 8, 2021 4 Councilmember Holmes discussed how the area would be impacted if a roundabout were installed by the County. She believed the most important thing with this project was to have a trail installed. Council consensus was to have the trail on the west side with Option 3. D. LJFD Future Fire Station Sign City Administrator Perrault stated the fire department has requested the City Council consider allowing a sign on their Pine Tree Drive site noting it is the location of a future fire station. City Code is silent on “future development” signs; however, the City Attorney noted this would be considered a Government Sign, which does not require formal approval but should be given the informal nod from the City Council. The sign would be a 4’ x 8’ sign that would have a rendering similar to the one below, and would note “Future Lake Johanna Fire Station Headquarters – Serving the Cities of Arden Hills, North Oaks, and Shoreview”. Staff would also ensure the sign is positioned so as not to adversely affect any operations, such as, snow plowing. Councilmember Scott asked if this would be a permanent sign. City Administrator Perrault stated this sign would be temporary in nature. Council consensus was to support the “future site” sign along Pine Tree Drive for the Lake Johanna Fire Station Headquarters. E. 2022 Council Liaison and Mayor Pro Tem Appointments City Clerk Hanson stated each year, a Councilmember is appointed to serve as liaison on the various committees and commissions in the City. She explained the appointments would be brought forward to the Council on December 13, 2021. Councilmember Holmes asked when the Gateway Visitor Bureau meetings would be held. City Administrator Perrault stated he understood this group met four times per year and when he had this information, he would forward it to the City Council. Mayor Grant requested the Council send him an email with their preferences for 2022 appointments. City Administrator Perrault reported staff would like direction on how to address Commission and Committee members that have exceeded their three-term limit. Councilmember Holden requested staff provide the Council with a list of members that have exceeded their term limit. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 8, 2021 5 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES The Council discussed letters that have been sent to City Councilmembers and after discussion it was recommended the Mayor send a letter in response to these letters. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session meeting at 5:55 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: November 22, 2021 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 8, 2021 ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the Special City Council meeting at 5:56 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung (attending via Zoom) and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; City Planner Jessica Jagoe; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. October 11, 2021, Regular City Council B. October 18, 2021, City Council Work Session Councilmember Holmes had one minor change to the October 18, 2021 City Council Work Session minutes and indicated she provided the changes to the City Clerk. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the October 11, 2021, Regular City Council meeting minutes as presented; and the October 18, 2021, City Council Work Session meeting minutes as amended. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – NOVEMBER 8, 2021 2 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2021-063 – 2022 Curbside and Non-Curbside Recycling Fees C. Motion to Approve 2022-2024 Agreement for Law Enforcement Services with Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office D. Motion to Approve Termination of Contract for HCSP Contribution by Employees E. Motion to Approve LMCIT Payment F. Motion to Approve Construction Contract with Insituform Technologies USA, LLC for the 2021 CIPP Lining Project G. Motion to Approve Appointment of Accounting Clerk H. Motion to Approve Payment No. 5 – C&L Excavating, Inc. – 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements Project MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). 4. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 5. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Scott congratulated the newly appointed Accounting Clerk Katlyn Adair. Councilmember Scott stated that Thursday is Veterans Day and he thanked all those that have served. Councilmember Scott commented that he served as an election judge and while this year was a school board election only, nearly 500 voters turned out to vote, which he found to be very impressive. He thanked the community for supporting their schools. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor CONSENT ITEM 6A MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims and Payroll Listing Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following:  Claims and Payroll Listing All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact N/A Attachments 2021 Payroll #23 $104,989.12 Total Payroll $104,989.12 Paid Claims - 10/30/21 through 11/12/2021 (Check Nos. 50457-50485 and ACH Checks) $1,048,706.14 Total Accounts Payable $1,048,706.14 Total Claims $1,153,695.26 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 23 CHECKS DATED: 11/12/21 Biweekly: 10/23/21 - 11/05/21 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 7,325.18 EFT SIT 3,116.13 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,455.05 EFT FICA Medicare 1,041.92 EFT TOTAL TAXES 15,938.28 Health Premium 1,536.26 A/P Check* Dental Premium 169.48 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1,705.74 HSA Health Saving 380.00 Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 0.00 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 536.97 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 524.03 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,441.00 PERA 4,075.56 EFT ICMA 3,346.31 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 614.40 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 799.58 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 8,835.85 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 1,040.52 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 16.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 42.09 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 8.40 A/P Check* UNUM 19.51 A/P Check* AFLAC 22.76 EFT TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,289.28 Total Employee Deductions 29,210.15 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 46,093.15 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 75,303.30 Plus City Paid Benefit 29,685.82 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 104,989.12 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 75,303.30 Less Total FSA 1,705.74 Less Total H.SA 1,441.00 Less Voluntary Ins 31.16 Less Non Taxable Reimbursement 270.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 71,855.40 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,455.05 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,041.92 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 86.00 86.00 1,125.00 4,702.55 421.74 5,124.29 17,853.56 1,125.00 5,496.97 17,461.96 391.60 CITY BENEFIT 4,455.05 1,041.92 Accounts Payable User: Printed: pang.silseth 11/15/2021 1:11 PM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription ACH001 US BANK 10/31/2021ACH FRIDJ102021 SQ *MINNESOTA FALL MAINTE 120.00 FRIDJ102021 MIDWEST AUTO DETAIL 165.59 FRIDJ102021 SQ *MINNESOTA FALL MAINTE 150.00 GEBAM102021 U OF M CONTLEARNING-Training 145.00 HANSJ102021 JIMMY JOHNS-Worksession 112.64 HANSJ102021 HILTON GARDEN-Adv Academy Training 285.42 HOLDB102021 MICROSOFT Subscription 107.36 MIKAT102021 FLEET FARM -Pressure Washer hookup 38.83 MIKAT102021 THE HOME DEPOT 2828 51.18 MIKAT102021 APPLE.COM/BILL-Icloud 0.99 MIKAT102021 THE HOME DEPOT 2828-Impact Set 35.79 VAUGJ102021 TARGET-Halloween Supplies 193.49 VAUGJ102021 BEACONATHLE-base anchors 300.90 VAUGJ102021 FUN EXPRESS-Halloween Supplies 96.19 VAUGJ102021 FUN EXPRESS-Halloween Supplies 60.05 VAUGJ102021 BEACON ATHLETICS-base anchors 63.52 VAUGJ102021 FUN EXPRESS-Halloween Supplies 32.24 VAUGJ102021 THE CARY COMPANY-Trash Receptacle Lids 256.62 VAUGJ102021 TARGET-Halloween Supplies 115.53 2,331.34Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH001: ACH002 AFLAC 10/31/2021ACH 660347 Insurance Premiums- Oct 2021 45.52 45.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH002: ACH005 MINNESOTA REVENUE-SALES & USE TAX10/31/2021ACH 92021 Sept Sales/Use Tax -3.15 92021 Sept Sales/Use Tax 0.15 92021 Sept Sales/Use Tax 0.67 92021 Sept Sales/Use Tax 40.33 38.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH005: ACH006 MN DEPT OF LABOR-BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE10/31/2021ACH 92021 Q3 Building Surcharge 18,882.38 92021 Q3 Building Surcharge -755.50 18,126.88Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH006: 20,541.74Total for 10/31/2021: 0189 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 11/05/2021ACH 1100186 October locates 68.85 1100186 October locates 68.85 1100186 October locates 68.85 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 206.55Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0192 GRAINGER INC 11/05/2021ACH 9094900033 Battery chargers 79.54 79.54Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0230 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 11/05/2021ACH 1328312-00 Mower parts #457 457.90 1328319-00 Mower parts #456 & #458 1,045.00 1328322-00 Mower parts #457 93.10 1328670-00 Mower parts #456 & #458 64.88 1,660.88Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0230: 0285 XCEL ENERGY 11/05/2021ACH 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 1,560.58 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 52.20 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 1,152.32 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 251.98 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 283.43 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 1,868.79 753753740 9/14/21-10/13/21 1,290.44 6,459.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0292 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC 11/05/2021ACH 3508125 October rental 28.52 28.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 11/05/2021ACH 0230452 Q3 water 285,439.26 230484 IT services - November 6,803.72 292,242.98Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 0327 STAPLES INC 11/05/2021ACH 3489469330 Supplies 136.37 3489928883 Supplies 223.81 3489928883 Supplies 16.07 3490442890 Supplies 35.98 3490442890 Supplies 45.88 3490509636 Supplies 306.19 3490509636 Supplies 35.59 799.89Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0772 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 11/05/2021ACH BB10106 Supplies Edgewater 281.60 281.60Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0772: 0922 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION11/05/2021ACH 2021-231 October services 1,019.25 1,019.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 10342 MITCHELL GEBAUER 11/05/2021ACH 10292021 Mileage reimb 10/26-10/29 291.20 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 291.20Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10342: 10343 TIM BEEBE 11/05/2021ACH 10292021 Mileage reimb 10/25-10/29 464.80 464.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10343: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 11/05/2021ACH M1360 October meetings 209.00 M1360 October meetings 151.00 M1370 Council meeting 10/25 223.00 583.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 1252 CAMPBELL KNUTSON - ATTORNEYS AT LAW11/05/2021ACH 3231G-0921 September Legal 62.00 3231G-0921 Escrow PC 21-017 #593 Sept Legal 107.90 3231G-0921 September Legal 1,286.50 3231G-0921 September Legal 201.50 3231G-0921 September Legal 992.00 3231G-0921 Sunram Construction Sept Legal 128.10 3231G-0921 Escrow PC 21-019 #596 Sept Legal 62.00 3231G-0921 Escrow PC 21-011 #609 Sept Legal 300.96 3,140.96Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1252: 1330 MN CLN SERVICES INC 11/05/2021ACH 1121NN01 October janitorial 2,005.58 2,005.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1330: 3096 AUTO PLUS 11/05/2021ACH 391079769 Supplies 3.24 391079995 Supplies 17.36 391080014 Supplies 43.26 391080035 Supplies -9.36 54.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3096: 4447 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11/05/2021ACH B272258 2021 PMP thru 10/22/21 1,388.25 1,388.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4447: 6009 ZIEGLER INC 11/05/2021ACH IN000303884 Light tower 12,493.00 12,493.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6009: 6129 FAST SIGNS INC 11/05/2021ACH 204-56735 Nametags/Office signs 55.32 204-56885 Name plate - PW Director 25.00 80.32Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6129: 7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 11/05/2021ACH 1220062 Restrooms 10/30-11/26 233.25 233.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025: 7501 KELLY & LEMMONS PA 11/05/2021ACH Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 56876 October prosecution 3,114.00 3,114.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: mnli MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES INC11/05/2021ACH 31405 Weed control 8/17/21 220.00 220.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor mnli: TOII TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 11/05/2021ACH 102021 October inspections 2,746.00 2,746.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TOII: 7804 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO 11/05/202150457 211015 Black dirt 14.85 14.85Total for Check Number 50457: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 11/05/202150458 513556 Paint mixer 8.99 515934 Nuts & bolts 5.44 14.43Total for Check Number 50458: CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 11/05/202150459 184503.1021 October pension 1,843.20 1,843.20Total for Check Number 50459: 10405 DALEY ELECTRIC LLC 11/05/202150460 210522 City hall repairs 835.00 835.00Total for Check Number 50460: dmlp DELL MARKETING LP 11/05/202150461 10527983096 Tablet keyboard Bldg Off 128.99 128.99Total for Check Number 50461: 10446 FINANCE & COMMERCE 11/05/202150462 4562862 1 year subscription renewal 139.00 139.00Total for Check Number 50462: 0176 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE INC 11/05/202150463 094354 Mounting tape 24.99 24.99Total for Check Number 50463: 10362 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/05/202150464 INV9261497 10/25/21-11/24/21 copier 77.18 INV9261497 10/25/21-11/24/21 copier 13.62 90.80Total for Check Number 50464: 10458 MARUDAS GRAPHICS INC 11/05/202150465 51631 Envelopes 671.67 671.67Total for Check Number 50465: 1058 MIDC ENTERPRISES INC 11/05/202150466 I0048099 Supplies 45.08 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 45.08Total for Check Number 50466: 0381 MISSIONSQUARE RETIREMENT 11/05/202150467 109-320940 Q4 plan fee 250.00 250.00Total for Check Number 50467: 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 11/05/202150468 315800112021 Nov premium/Oct adjust 16.00 16.00Total for Check Number 50468: 3100 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS CO11/05/202150469 9672443.1021 October premium 39.02 39.02Total for Check Number 50469: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 11/05/202150470 PRK-001971 Q3 Inspection Services 3,091.68 3,091.68Total for Check Number 50470: 10474 RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES 11/05/202150471 217792 Clean up day 10/2/21 7,297.38 217792 Clean up day 10/2/21 -1,194.00 6,103.38Total for Check Number 50471: 0282 REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 11/05/202150472 0899-003794055 August revenue share -4,781.08 0899-003794055 Sept revenue share -4,591.06 0899-003794055 October recycling 8,282.00 0899-003796290 PW October waste 1,565.79 475.65Total for Check Number 50472: 5497 SCHWAAB INC 11/05/202150473 6460723 Notary stamp 35.25 35.25Total for Check Number 50473: 0336 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS INC 11/05/202150474 67827 10/10-10/16 yard purchases 5.92 411.44 411.44Total for Check Number 50474: 1579 TOW MASTER INC 11/05/202150475 443799 Plow truck 85128 chassis 132,921.00 132,921.00Total for Check Number 50475: 476,745.24Total for 11/5/2021: 0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 11/12/2021ACH PR 21-23 PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 401 365.51 PR 21-23 PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employer Percent 401 421.74 787.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 11/12/2021ACH Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription PR 21-23 PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee Percent 269.26 PR 21-23 PR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00001.11.2021 ICMA Employee Deduction 2,711.54 2,980.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 10259 JOE VAUGHAN 11/12/2021ACH 110421 October Mileage Reimbursement 82.66 82.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10259: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 11/12/2021ACH 278164 2021 PMP-Hazelnut 19,882.50 278165 2022 PMP-Snelling 9,427.00 29,309.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1363 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 11/12/2021ACH 11752 Leak Locate 10/23/21 580.42 580.42Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1363: 4889 COMMUNITY FOOTWORKS 11/12/2021ACH 11032021 November Foot Clinic 224.00 224.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 5493 JOLENE TRAUBA 11/12/2021ACH 110521 Expense Reimbursement 53.54 110521 October Mileage Reimbursement 56.44 110521 Expense Reimbursement 21.39 131.37Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5493: 10466 C&L EXCAVATING INC 11/12/202150476 PW-21-0100 Pay5 2021 PMP Pmt 5 236,639.60 PW-21-0100 Pay5 2021 PMP Pmt 5 -11,831.98 224,807.62Total for Check Number 50476: 1033 COMCAST 11/12/202150477 101030.1121 Service 11/3-12/2 108.35 108.35Total for Check Number 50477: 10218 HR GREEN INC 11/12/202150478 147813 RRA-October 286.75 147814 Gen Engineering-October 14,015.00 147814 Parks-October 1,408.00 147814 Streets-October 367.50 147815 Lex Station Phase 3-October 367.50 147816 MVPS PC 18-014 #467 HR Green-October 280.00 16,724.75Total for Check Number 50478: 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSURANCE11/12/202150479 BP3.1221 December Insurance 10,600.00 NB4.1221 December Insurance 1,527.00 12,127.00Total for Check Number 50479: 0390 INT'L UNION OPERATING ENGINEERS-UNION DUES11/12/202150480 1200.1121 November Dues 280.00 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 280.00Total for Check Number 50480: 5138 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 11/12/202150481 GL 87129 TCAAP/JDA Litigation GL 87129 261,460.38 261,460.38Total for Check Number 50481: 10448 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/12/202150482 456870302 Copier Contract 9/25-11/25 129.99 456870302 Copier Contract 9/25-11/25 22.93 152.92Total for Check Number 50482: 1074 PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE INC 11/12/202150483 83906 Tree Removal-3394 Glenarden Ct 750.00 750.00Total for Check Number 50483: 1300 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 11/12/202150484 090 0658782 November Mats 147.36 147.36Total for Check Number 50484: USPS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 11/12/202150485 110921 Permit #3675 Postage-Rec Brochures 764.78 764.78Total for Check Number 50485: 551,419.16Total for 11/12/2021: Report Total (62 checks): 1,048,706.14 Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/15/2021 1:11 PM) CONSENT ITEM – 6B MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director SUBJECT: Resolution 2021-064 Accepting the Liability Coverage Limits from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for 2022 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Resolution 2021-064 accepting the liability coverage limits from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for 2022. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background Each year the City Council is required to decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. In past history, the City has not waived the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 (this would mean that the City accepts liability coverage limits of $1,500,000). Budget Impact None. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2021-064 Attachment B: Waiver Form To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-064 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS FROM THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST (LMCIT) WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the City accepts liability coverage limits of one million, five hundred thousand dollars and zero cents ($1,500,000.00) from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for calendar year 2022. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021. ________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk LIABILITY COVERAGE – WAIVER FORM Members who obtain liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the member’s effective date of coverage. Return completed form to your underwriter or email to pstech@lmc.org. The decision to waive or not waive the statutory tort limits must be made annually by the member’s governing body, in consultation with its attorney if necessary. Members who obtain liability coverage from LMCIT must decide whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision has the following effects: • If the member does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant could recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether the member purchases the optional LMCIT excess liability coverage. • If the member waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could recover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence (under the waive option, the tort cap liability limits are only waived to the extent of the member’s liability coverage limits, and the LMCIT per occurrence limit is $2,000,000). The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. • If the member waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. 2 X o LMCIT Member Name: City of Arden Hills __________________________________________________________________________ Check one: The member DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04. The member WAIVES the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of member’s governing body meeting: __November 22, 2021___________________________ Signature: Position: ________________________________ X Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 6C MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Joe Vaughan, Recreation Programmer SUBJECT: Accepting Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A $3668.00 N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • City Council should consider to approve Resolution 2021-065 Accepting a Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation in the amount of $3668.00. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background The Arden Hills Foundation has been established as a 501c3 organization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens, cities are authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefits of recreational services. Discussion The Arden Hills Foundation has donated $3668.00 to the City of Arden Hills for hot coal receptacles, large charcoal grills and concrete pads. To comply with State Statutes, the City needs to acknowledge the donation and issue receipt of the donation to the Arden Hills Foundation. Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2021-065 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-065 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION WHEREAS, Arden Hills (“City”) is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens, and is specifically authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefit of recreational services pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17; and WHEREAS, The following entity has offered to contribute the cash amount set forth below to the city: Name of Donor Amount Arden Hills Foundation $3,668.00 WHEREAS, All such donations have been contributed to assist the City in the establishment and operation of recreational facilities and programs either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations offered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, THAT: 1. The donation described above is accepted and shall be used to establish recreational facilities either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the City’s receipt of the donor’s donation. 3. The finance department is hereby authorized to complete any budget adjustments necessary to reflect this donation and corresponding expenditures. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021. _______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6D MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Arden Manor Park (CDBG) & Floral Park Hardcourt Improvements – PSA Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $107,200 $81,161 CDBG Funds, PIR – Parks, RCWD Grant Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Professional Services Agreement with HR Green in the amount of $81,161. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion On April 12, 2021, City Council approved Resolution 2021-017 supporting the City’s application for a CDBG funding opportunity for Arden Manor Park. At a Work Session on November 15, 2021, Council discussed the proposed improvements at Arden Manor Park and Floral Park. At the Works Session Council also directed Staff to bring forward the Professional Services Agreement from HR Green. Staff has reviewed the PSA and recommends that the Council approve of the agreement with HR Green and proceed with the work. The HR Green proposal provided a clear and organized approach, a team with experience in similar grant funded projects, a detailed project delivery schedule, and sufficient hours to complete a quality design and properly administer the construction process. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact The 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan has a total of $536,000 programmed for the improvements at Arden Manor Park and Floral Park. Engineering and construction admin services are typically estimated at 20% of the estimated construction costs which equates to the budgeted amount of $107,200. HR Green’s proposal is for $81,161 for which includes design, Public Engagement, Council meetings, Open-House, CDBG administration items, RCWD grant application and administration, design for both parks, bidding assistance, and construction observation. Attachments Attachment A: PSA – HR Green Attachment B: Fee Schedule Version 2.3 02052021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT For Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services David Swearingen, PE Public Works Director City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 651.792.7847 20-Park-003, 22-Park-001 John Morast, PE – Regional Director HR Green, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West Suite 400N St. Paul, MN 55114 HR Green Project Number 211646 November 10, 2021 Version2.3 02052021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 3.0 DELIVERABLES AND SCHEDULES INCLUDED IN THIS AGREEMENT 4.0 ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN AGREEMENT/SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES 5.0 SERVICES BY OTHERS 6.0 CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES 7.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE 8.0 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 1 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 THIS AGREEMENT is between City of Arden Hills (hereafter “CLIENT”) and HR GREEN, INC. (hereafter "COMPANY"). 1.0 Project Understanding The CLIENT desires to make improvements at Arden Manor Park which will be partially funded by a Ramsey County Community Development Block (CDBG) grant which was submitted and approved in 2021, and Floral Park, which will be funded by City Capital Improvement (PIR) funds. The parks may be improved with the following: playground replacement, basketball court resurfacing or updated to include additional court activities, park shelter improvements, park signage, lighting, parking and drainage improvements. The improvement of specific items will depend on public buy-in; therefore, public engagement will play a large role in the project. The original Arden Manor Park plan prepared as part of the CDBG grant approval will be used as a guide and enhanced based on Community input. The resurfacing or repurposing of Floral Park will also be dependent on public engagement feedback, park needs and project budget. The CLIENT is obligated to complete the Arden Manor Park improvements by December 2022, per the CBDG grant application, and anticipates having construction documents completed by March 2022 so bidding may occur in the spring of 2022. Construction would begin in the summer of 2022 with completion in the fall. While the City does not have funding obligated timelines for Floral Park improvements, they are scheduled for construction in 2022 in the 2021 Budget and CIP, and the intent is to combine both parks projects into a single design and construction project, realizing some cost savings and efficiencies of scale. The applicant for the Arden Manor Park grant funding is the CLIENT. COMPANY will work with CLIENT to follow all guidelines established by Ramsey County, coordinate activities, and prepare paperwork and updates required. CDBG eligible activities and requirements will be tracked separately for both design and construction. The Floral Park project will be a more traditional process, including public involvement, design and construction. At this time, there is no soil boring information for the sites. To design paving sections and footing elements for the site improvements, a geotechnical report including soil boring data will be collected under separate activities and combined with soil boring collections for the City’s street feasibility study. HR Green will prepare, coordinate, and submit reporting, agreements and other required documentation as needed in the design and construction of the project to comply with the CDBG program. 2.0 Scope of Services The CLIENT agrees to employ COMPANY to perform the following services: 1. Survey Services Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 2 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 a. Boundary and Topographic Survey – COMPANY will complete a topographic survey of the park sites and surrounding drainage and appropriate roadway and trail infrastructure. Elevations will be referenced to local benchmarks. These services will be coordinated with the CLIENT and the adjacent property manager. b. Boundary and Topographic Drawing – Final drafting to be completed with existing visible improvements on subject property shown. The drawing will be completed and will be used as the base map for the project. Because the final drawing will be incorporated into the engineering plans, a Topographic Survey Plat is not included within this proposal. 2. Public Involvement a. COMPANY will prepare signage and web based tools for the public to use to provide input on the park amenities and improvements provided in the grant application. b. COMPANY will collect interactive feedback and develop ideas and options for the park site improvements. COMPANY will conduct an open house meeting (virtual or in-person) for with the CLIENT for the local community. The open house meetings will be held at the Arden Hills City Hall site. 3. Conceptual Park Design & Layout a. COMPANY will prepare a grant application for Rice Creek Watershed District funding for the Arden Manor Park site. This includes completion of a conceptual plan of drainage improvements (1 title sheet and 2 plan sheets maximum) and the application form. b. Using the CDBG grant application Arden Manor Park layout plan as a general guide, and gaining input from the CLIENT and community, COMPANY will develop an updated conceptual park layout. All features that were part of the approved application will be featured in this conceptual design. Current site topography and other existing conditions will be considered in this phase of design. c. Company will comply with CBDG processes in completing a NEPA checklist to evaluate the significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the project area. d. For Floral Park, COMPANY will prepare a conceptual park layout plan based on the existing conditions and community involvement input. e. COMPANY will provide a general review of the estimated costs included in the grant application and the City CIP cost estimates, update them based on the selected features and improvements determined by the public involvement process, conceptual design and recent bid summary information. COMPANY will Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 3 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 provide an Engineer’s Opinion of Construction Costs (EOPCC) to the CLIENT for each park site. f. COMPANY will have one (1) meeting with the CLIENT to review both conceptual layouts and EOPCC and make the necessary refinements, based on CLIENT input g. COMPANY will coordinate with utilities and regulatory agencies during the concept layout to ensure compliance throughout the process. 4. Final Design a. COMPANY will produce final plans based on reviews and approvals of concept layouts for each park site. Plan reviews will occur roughly at the 50% completion sage. CLIENT will provide input as to the layout, grading and details and will provide review comments and instruct on any necessary revisions. The second review submittal and meeting will occur at the 90% complete stage of he plans, specifications and EOPCC, offering the CLIENT a final opportunity to review and make refinements prior to bidding the project. The EOPCC will breakout and track the Arden Manor Park CDBG eligible components, pursuant to CBDG grant and construction guidelines and requirements. 5. Construction Documents a. This phase provides services to complete design and construction details for all the improvements within the park as listed above. b. Construction documents will consist of construction drawings and specifications in the bid documents. Bid documents will contain CDBG compliant requirements for the Arden Manor Park work, including prevailing wage and reporting requirements. c. Based on the previously completed Conceptual Design, COMPANY will prepare these documents, for the park projects: i. Title Sheet with Sheet Index, Location Map, and Project Contact Information. ii. General Notes Sheet with Site/Civil Notes, Erosion Control Requirements, and Landscaping General Notes as necessary to provide instruction to the contractor. iii. Existing Conditions Plan indicating existing topography, sidewalks, shelter, pavement edges, trees, drainage structures other available site infrastructure and removal information. iv. Layout and Dimensioning Plan that will indicate layout geometrics for all of the site improvements listed above. v. Grading and Drainage Plan with both existing and proposed contours, spot grade elevations as necessary, erosion control measures and any necessary drainage improvements. All facilities within the public park will be designed to be ADA accessible. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 4 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 vi. Construction Detail Sheets. These sheets will provide all of the necessary construction details to construct the improvements listed above. vii. Landscape Plan. Sheet will indicate any tree, shrub or planting locations and species callouts including plant schedule. d. Refined EOPCC will be prepared for the project once these documents are complete and prior to bidding the job. The EOPCC will be broken into CDBG eligible costs for the Arden Manor Park for clarity, tracking and reporting purposes. e. Progress Meetings. COMPANY shall conduct three (3) progress meetings with the CLIENT during this phase of the work. The first meeting will occur following the public engagement and involvement and confirming the conceptual layout. The second meeting will occur after conceptual layout, at a roughly 50% complete stage and will focus on the progress and completion of the phase. CLIENT will offer input as to the layout, grading and details, and will instruct the COMPANY as to any necessary revisions. The third meeting will be at the 90% complete stage and will offer the CLIENT a final opportunity to make refinements prior to bidding the work. 6. Bidding Assistance a. The COMPANY will assist the CLIENT in bidding this work. COMPANY will prepare bid documents for CLIENT to advertise and post the project. CLIENT will disseminate contract documents and COMPANY be available to answer inquiries and questions from prospective bidders, and issue addenda as appropriate to clarify or expand the bidding documents. b. COMPANY will assist the CLIENT in conducting a Pre-Bid meeting with all prospective bidders. c. The COMPANY shall have a representative present when bids are opened and shall make a tabulation of bids for the CLIENT. COMPANY shall analyze the bids and advise the CLIENT as to a recommendation on award. 7. Construction Administration a. COMPANY will facilitate a preconstruction meeting and provide up to 150 hours of on-site construction observation, weekly construction meetings, prepare observation logs, review and approve pay applications, report on contractor wages review, respond to requests for information and prepare change orders. COMPANY will keep notes and take pictures when onsite during construction to be provided to the CLIENT. 3.0 Deliverables and Schedules Included in this Agreement 1. Meetings The COMPANY anticipates that this project will require up to seven (7) meetings with the CLIENT and public to complete the required tasks. These meetings are outlined as follows: Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 5 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 Meeting 1: Community Open House/Virtual Meeting – Arden Manor Park Meeting 2: Conceptual Design Review Meeting 3: 50% Construction Document Review Meeting 4: 90% Construction Document Review Meeting 5: Pre-Bid Meeting Meeting 6: Bid Opening Meeting 7: Preconstruction Meeting 2. Deliverables Deliverables included in this proposal are: a. A .pdf electronic file of the finalized conceptual drawing. b. One (1) hard copy, in 11" x 17" format and a .pdf electronic file of the construction drawings along with one (1) hard copy and an electronic .pdf file of the bidding documents. HR Green proposes the following schedule for the project: 1. CLIENT authorizes COMPANY to begin - TBD 2. Deploy web-based tools for public input - within 2 weeks of authorization 3. Open House – within 6 weeks of authorization 4. Concept Drawing and Rice Creek Watershed District Application, by December 22, 2021 5. Conceptual Layout – January 2022 6. Preliminary Design – February 2022 7. Final Design – March 2022 8. Project Bid – April 2022 9. Project Award – May 2022 10. Construction Services – July 2022 thru November 2022 This schedule was prepared to include reasonable allowances for review and approval times required by the CLIENT and public authorities having jurisdiction over the project. This schedule shall be equitably adjusted as the project progresses, allowing for changes in the scope of the project requested by the CLIENT or for delays or other causes beyond the control of COMPANY. 4.0 Items not included in Agreement/Supplemental Services The following items are not included as part of this AGREEMENT: 1. Meetings other than those listed 2. Geotechnical studies & reports Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 6 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 3. Playground design (to be completed by manufacturer) 4. Graphics for park signage & interpretive signage Supplemental services not included in the AGREEMENT can be provided by COMPANY under separate agreement, if desired. 5.0 Services by Others 1. Project topographic and construction survey will be provided by Kaskaskia Engineering. 6.0 Client Responsibilities CLIENT responsibilities include: 1. Providing the list of equipment to be used within the park, either per the original grant application or updated since the application. 2. Provide COMPANY with graphics, artwork and logos for all park signage elements. 7.0 Professional Services Fee 7.1 Fees The fee for services will be based on COMPANY standard hourly rates current at the time the AGREEMENT is signed. These standard hourly rates are subject to change upon 30 days’ written notice. Non-salary expenses directly attributable to the project such as: (1) living and traveling expenses of employees when away from the home office on business connected with the project; (2) identifiable communication expenses; (3) identifiable reproduction costs applicable to the work; and (4) outside services will be charged in accordance with the rates current at the time the service is done. 7.2 Invoices Invoices for COMPANY’s services shall be submitted, on a monthly basis. Invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt. If any invoice is not paid within 30 days, COMPANY may, without waiving any claim or right against the CLIENT, and without liability whatsoever to the CLIENT, suspend or terminate the performance of services. The retainer shall be credited on the final invoice. Accounts unpaid 30 days after the invoice date may be subject to a monthly service charge of 1.5% (or the maximum legal rate) on the unpaid balance. In the event that any portion of an account remains unpaid 60 days after the billing, COMPANY may institute collection action and the CLIENT shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. 7.3 Extra Services Any service required but not included as part of this AGREEMENT shall be considered extra services. Extra services will be billed on a Time and Material basis with prior approval of the CLIENT. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 7 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 7.4 Exclusion This fee does not include attendance at any meetings or public hearings other than those specifically listed in the Scope of Services. These service items are considered extra and are billed separately on an hourly basis. 7.5 Payment The CLIENT AGREES to pay COMPANY on the following basis: Lump sum in the amount of ___$81, 161 ___ Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 8 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 8.0 Terms and Conditions The following Terms and Conditions are incorporated into this AGREEMENT and made a part of it. 8.1 Standard of Care Services provided by COMPANY under this AGREEMENT will be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing at the same time and in the same or similar locality. 8.2 Entire Agreement This AGREEMENT and its attachments constitute the entire understanding between CLIENT and COMPANY relating to COMPANY’s services. Any prior or contemporaneous agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no effect. Subsequent modifications or amendments to this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and signed by the parties to this AGREEMENT. If the CLIENT, its officers, agents, or employees request COMPANY to perform extra services pursuant to this AGREEMENT, CLIENT will pay for the additional services even though an additional written agreement is not issued or signed. 8.3 Time Limit and Commencement of Services This AGREEMENT must be executed within ninety (90) days to be accepted under the terms set forth herein. The services will be commenced immediately upon receipt of this signed AGREEMENT. 8.4 Suspension of Services If the Project or the COMPANY’S services are suspended by the CLIENT for more than thirty (30) calendar days, consecutive or in the aggregate, over the term of this AGREEMENT, the COMPANY shall be compensated for all services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred prior to the receipt of notice of suspension. In addition, upon resumption of services, the CLIENT shall compensate the COMPANY for expenses incurred as a result of the suspension and resumption of its services, and the COMPANY’S schedule and fees for the remainder of the Project shall be equitably adjusted. If the COMPANY’S services are suspended for more than ninety (90) days, consecutive or in the aggregate, the COMPANY may terminate this AGREEMENT upon giving not less than five (5) calendar days' written notice to the CLIENT. If the CLIENT is in breach of this AGREEMENT, the COMPANY may suspend performance of services upon five (5) calendar days' notice to the CLIENT. The COMPANY shall have no liability to the CLIENT, and the CLIENT agrees to make no claim for any delay or damage as a result of such suspension cause d by any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CLIENT. Upon receipt of payment in full of all outstanding sums due from the CLIENT, or curing of such other breach which caused the COMPANY to suspend services, the COMPANY shall resume services and there shall be an equitable adjustment to the remaining project schedule and fees as a result of the suspension. 8.5 Books and Accounts COMPANY will maintain books and accounts of payroll costs, travel, subsistence, field, and incidental expenses for a period of five (5) years. Said books and accounts will be available at all reasonable times for examination by CLIENT at the corporate office of COMPANY during that time. 8.6 Insurance COMPANY will maintain insurance for claims under the Worker's Compensation Laws, and from General Liability and Automobile claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage, and Professional Liability insurance caused by the negligent performance by COMPANY's employees of the functions and services required under this AGREEMENT. 8.7 Termination or Abandonment Either party has the option to terminate this AGREEMENT. In the event of failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party, then the obligation to provide further services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated upon seven (7) days’ written notice. If any portion of the services is terminated or abandoned by CLIENT, the provisions of this Schedule of Fees and Conditions in regard to compensation and payment shall apply insofar as possible to that portion of the services not Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 9 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 terminated or abandoned. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any phase of the project, the fee for services performed during such phase shall be based on COMPANY's reasonable estimate of the portion of such phase completed prior to said termination, plus a reasonable amount to reimburse COMPANY f or termination costs. 8.8 Waiver COMPANY's waiver of any term, condition, or covenant or breach of any term, condition, or covenant, shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant, or the breach thereof. 8.9 Severability If any provision of this AGREEMENT is declared invalid, illegal, or incapable of being enforced by any Court of competent jurisdiction, all of the remaining provisions of this AGREEMENT shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect, and no provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other provision unless so expressed https://hrgreen.sharepoint.com/:w:/r/sites/LegalInsurance/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B6D0907FD - E1D4-45C1-A529- 9CB74D158554%7D&file=SUB_HRG_SubconsultantAgreementTemplate.dotx&action=def ault&mobileredirect =true d herein. 8.10 Successors and Assigns All of the terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and are binding upon the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns, provided, however, that no ass ignment of this AGREEMENT shall be made without written consent of the parties to this AGREEMENT. 8.11 Third-Party Beneficiaries Nothing contained in this AGREEMENT shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or the COMPANY. The COMPANY’s services under this AGREEMENT are being performed solely for the CLIENT’s benefit, and no other party or entity shall have any claim against the COMPANY because of this AGREEMENT or the performance or nonperformance of services hereunder. The CLIENT and COMPANY agree to require a similar provision in all contracts with contractors, subcontractors, sub-consultants, vendors and other entities involved in this project to carry out the intent of this provision. 8.12 Governing Law and Jurisdiction The CLIENT and the COMPANY agree that this AGREEMENT and any legal actions concerning its validity, interpretation and performance shall be governed by the laws of the State of Iowa without regard to any conflict of law provisions, which may apply the laws of other jurisdictions. It is further agreed that any legal action between the CLIENT and the COMPANY arising out of this AGREEMENT or the performance of the services shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Iowa. 8.13 Dispute Resolution Mediation. In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project, the CLIENT and COMPANY agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relating to this AGREEMENT shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. The CLIENT and COMPANY further agree to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with independent contractors and consultants retained for the project and to re quire all independent contractors and consultants also to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with subcontractors, sub-consultants, suppliers or fabricators so retained, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between the parties to those agreements. 8.14 Attorney’s Fees If litigation arises for purposes of collecting fees or expenses due under this A GREEMENT, the Court in such litigation shall award reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney fees, to the party justly entitled thereto. In awarding attorney fees, the Court shall not be bound by any Court fee schedule, but shall, in the interest of justice, award the full amount of costs, expenses, and attorney fees paid or incurred in good faith. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 10 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 8.15 Ownership of Instruments of Service All reports, plans, specifications, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates and other documents including all documents on electronic media prepared by COMPANY as instruments of service shall remain the property of COMPANY. COMPANY shall retain these records for a period of five (5) years following completion/submission of the records, during which period they will be made available to the CLIENT at all reasonable times. 8.16 Reuse of Documents All project documents including, but not limited to, plans and specifications furnished by COMPANY under this project are intended for use on this project only. Any reuse, without specific written verification or adoption by COMPANY, shall be at the CLIENT's sole risk, and CLIENT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless COMPANY from all claims, damages and expenses including attorneys’ fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Under no circumstances shall delivery of electronic files for use by the CLIENT be deemed a sale by the COMPANY, and the COMPANY makes no warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. In no event shall the COMPANY be liable for indirect or consequential damages as a result of the CLIENT’s use or reuse of the electronic files. 8.17 Failure to Abide by Design Documents or To Obtain Guidance The CLIENT agrees that it would be unfair to hold COMPANY liable for problems that might occur should COMPANY’S plans, specifications or design intents not be followed, or for problems resulting from others' failure to obtain and/or follow COMPANY’S guidance with respect to any errors, omissions, inconsistencies, ambiguities or conflicts which are detected or alleged to exist in or as a consequence of impl ementing COMPANY’S plans, specifications or other instruments of service. Accordingly, the CLIENT waives any claim against COMPANY, and agrees to defend, indemnify and hold COMPANY harmless from any claim for injury or losses that results from failure to follow COMPANY’S plans, specifications or design intent, or for failure to obtain and/or follow COMPANY’S guidance with respect to any alleged errors, omissions, inconsistencies, ambiguities or conflicts contained within or arising as a result of implement ing COMPANY’S plans, specifications or other instruments of service. The CLIENT also agrees to compensate COMPANY for any time spent and expenses incurred remedying CLIENT’s failures according to COMPANY’S prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. 8.18 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost As part of the Deliverables, COMPANY may submit to the CLIENT an opinion of probable cost required to construct work recommended, designed, or specified by COMPANY, if required by CLIENT. COMPANY is not a construction cost estimator or construction contractor, nor should COMPANY’S rendering an opinion of probable construction costs be considered equivalent to the nature and extent of service a construction cost estimator or construction contractor would provide. This requires COMPANY to make a number of assumptions as to actual conditions that will be encountered on site; the specific decisions of other design professionals engaged; the means and methods of construction the contractor will employ; the cost and extent of labor, equipment and materials the contractor will employ; contractor's techniques in determining prices and market conditions at the time, and other factors over which COMPANY has no control. Given the assumptions which must be made, COMPANY cannot guarantee the accuracy of its opinions of cost, and in recognition of that fact, the CLIENT waives any claim against COMPANY relative to the accuracy of COMPANY’S opinion of probable construction cost. 8.19 Design Information in Electronic Form Because electronic file information can be easily altered, corrupted, or modified by other parties, either intentionally or inadvertently, without notice or indication, COMPANY reserves the right to remove itself from its ownership and/or involvement in the material from each electronic medium not held in its possession. CLIENT shall retain copies of the work performed by COMPANY in electronic form only for information and use by CLIENT for the specific purpose for which COMPANY was engaged. Said material shall not be used by CLIENT or transferred to any other party, for use in other projects, additions to this project, or any other purpose for which the material was not strictly intended by COMPANY without COMPANY’s express written permission. Any unauthorized use or reuse or modifications of this material shall be at CLIENT’S sole risk. Furthermore, the CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold COMPANY harmless from all claims, injuries, damages, losses, expenses, and attorneys’ fees arising out of the modification or reuse of these materials. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 11 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 The CLIENT recognizes that designs, plans, and data stored on electronic media including, but not limited to computer disk, magnetic tape, or files transferred via email, may be subject to undetectable alteration and/or uncontrollable deterioration. The CLIENT, therefore, agrees that COMPANY shall not be liable for the completeness or accuracy of any materials provided on electronic media after a 30-day inspection period, during which time COMPANY shall correct any errors detected by the CLIENT to complete the design in accordance with the intent of the contract and specifications. After 40 days, at the request of the CLIENT, COMPANY shall submit a final set of sealed drawings, and any additional services to be performed by COMPANY relative to the submitted electronic materials shall be subject to separate agreement. The CLIENT is aware that differences may exist between the electronic files delivered and the printed hard-copy construction documents. In the event of a conflict between the signed construction documents prepared by the COMPANY and electronic files, the signed or sealed hard-copy construction documents shall govern. 8.20 Information Provided by Others The CLIENT shall furnish, at the CLIENT’s expense, all information, requirements, reports, data, surveys and instructions required by this AGREEMENT. The COMPANY may use such information, requirements, reports, data, surveys and instructions in performing its services and is entitled to rely upon the accurac y and completeness thereof. The COMPANY shall not be held responsible for any errors or omissions that may arise as a result of erroneous or incomplete information provided by the CLIENT and/or the CLIENT’s consultants and contractors. COMPANY is not responsible for accuracy of any plans, surveys or information of any type including electronic media prepared by any other consultants, etc. provided to COMPANY for use in preparation of plans. The CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the COMPANY from any damages, liabilities, or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs, arising out of or connected in any way with the services performed by other consultants engaged by the CLIENT. COMPANY is not responsible for accuracy of topographic surveys provided by others. A field check of a topographic survey provided by others will not be done under this AGREEMENT unless indicated in the Scope of Services. 8.21 Force Majeure The CLIENT agrees that the COMPANY is not responsible for damages arising directly or indirectly from any delays for causes beyond the COMPANY's control. CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold COMPANY, its consultants, agents, and employees harmless from any and all liability, oth er than that caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of COMPANY, arising out of or resulting from the same. For purposes of this AGREEMENT, such causes include, but are not limited to, strikes or other labor disputes; severe weather disruptions or other natural disasters or acts of God; fires, riots, war or other emergencies; disease epidemic or pandemic; failure of any government agency to act in a timely manner; failure of performance by the CLIENT or the CLIENT’S contractors or consultants; or discovery of any hazardous substances or differing site conditions. Severe weather disruptions include but are not limited to extensive rain, high winds, snow greater than two (2) inches and ice. In addition, if the delays resulting from any such causes increase the cost or time required by the COMPANY to perform its services in an orderly and efficient manner, the COMPANY shall be entitled to a reasonable adjustment in schedule and compensation. 8.22 Job Site Visits and Safety Neither the professional activities of COMPANY, nor the presence of COMPANY’S employees and sub- consultants at a construction site, shall relieve the general contractor and any other entity of their obligations, duties and responsibilities including, but not limited to, construction me ans, methods, sequence, techniques or procedures necessary for performing, superintending or coordinating all portions of the work of construction in accordance with the contract documents and any health or safety precautions required by any regulatory agencies. COMPANY and its personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety precautions. The CLIENT agrees that the general contractor is solely responsible for job site safety, and warrants that this intent shall be made evident in the CLIENT's AGREEMENT with the general contractor. The CLIENT also agrees that the CLIENT, COMPANY and COMPANY’S consultants shall be indemnified and shall be made additional insureds on the general contractor’s and all subcontractor’s general liability policies on a primary and non-contributory basis. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 12 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 8.23 Hazardous Materials CLIENT hereby understands and agrees that COMPANY has not created nor contributed to the creation or existence of any or all types of hazardous or toxic wastes, materials, chemical compounds, or substances, or any other type of environmental hazard or pollution, whether latent or patent, at CLIENT's premises, or in connection with or related to this project with respect to which COMPANY has been retained to provide professional services. The compensation to be paid COMPANY for said professional services is in no way commensurate with, and has not been calculated with reference to, t he potential risk of injury or loss which may be caused by the exposure of persons or property to such substances or conditions. Therefore, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold COMPANY, its officers, directo rs, employees, and consultants, harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, and expenses, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, including, but not limited to, attorney fees and Court costs, arising out of, or resulting from the discharge, escape, release, or saturation of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acid, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids gases, or any other materials, irritants, contaminants, or pollutants in or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upon, in, or into the surface or subsurface of soil, water, or watercourses, objects, or any tangible or intangible matter, whether sudden or not. It is acknowledged by both parties that COMPANY’S Scope of Services does not include any services related to asbestos or hazardous or toxic materials. In the event COMPANY or any other party encounters asbestos or hazardous or toxic materials at the job site, or should it become known in any way that such materials may be present at the job site or any adjacent areas that may affect the performance of COMPANY’S services, COMPANY may, at its option and without liability for consequential or any other damages, suspend performance of services on the project until the CLIENT retains appropriate specialist consultant(s) or contractor(s) to identify, abate and/or remove the asbestos or hazardous or toxic materials, and warrants that the job site is in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Nothing contained within this AGREEMENT shall be construed or interpreted as requiring COMPANY to assume the status of a generator, storer, transporter, treater, or disposal facility as those terms appear within the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C.A., §6901 et seq., as amended, or within any State statute governing the generation, treatment, storage, and disposal of waste. 8.24 Certificate of Merit The CLIENT shall make no claim for professional negligence, either directly or in a third party claim, against COMPANY unless the CLIENT has first provided COMPANY with a written certification executed by an independent design professional currently practicing in the same discipline as COMPANY and licensed in the State in which the claim arises. This certification shall: a) contain the name and license number of the certifier; b) specify each and every act or omission that the certifier contends is a violation of the standard of care expected of a design professional performing professional services under similar circumstances; and c) state in complete detail the basis for the certifier's opinion that each such act or omission constitutes such a violation. This certificate shall be provided to COMPANY not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the presentation of any claim or the institution of any judicial proceeding. 8.25 Limitation of Liability In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the Project to both the CLIENT and the COMPANY, the risks have been allocated such that the CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of the COMPANY and COMPANY’S officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and sub- consultants for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs and expert witness fees and costs, so that the total aggregate liability of the COMPANY and COMPANY’S officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and sub-consultants shall not exceed $50,000.00, or the COMPANY’S total fee for services rendered on this Project, whichever is greater. It is intended that this limitation apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law. 8.26 Environmental Audits/Site Assessments Environmental Audit/Site Assessment report(s) are prepared for CLIENT's sole use. CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold COMPANY, its consultants, agents, and employees harmless against all damages, claims, expenses, and losses arising out of or resulting from any reuse of the Environmental Audit/Site Assessment report(s) without the written authorization of COMPANY. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 13 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 8.30 Construction Observation COMPANY shall visit the project at appropriate intervals (as described in the scope of services) during construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the contractors' work and to determine if the work is proceeding in general accordance with the Contract Documents. The CLIENT has not retained COMPANY to make detailed inspections or to provide exhaustive or continuous project review and observation services. COMPANY does not guarantee the performance of, and shall have no responsibility for, the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractor, supplier or any other entity furnishing materials or performing any work on the project. If the CLIENT desires more extensive project observation or full -time project representation, the CLIENT shall request in writing such services be provided by COMPANY as Additional Services in accordance with the terms of the AGREEMENT. 8.31 Soliciting Employment Neither party to this AGREEMENT will solicit an employee of the other nor hire or make an offer of employment to an employee of the other that is working on this PROJECT, without prior written consent of the other party, during the time this AGREEMENT is in effect. 8.27 Data Backup and Recovery COMPANY will create scheduled data backups for the purpose of recovering CLIENT data in the event of data corruption or loss. These measures are taken to safeguard the present state of the GIS data with no intention on the part of the COMPANY to maintain archival versions of the CLIENT GIS data for the purpose of preserving a historical record of CLIENT’s GIS data. The backup schedule for the CLIENT GIS data will be concurrent with COMPANY’s internal data backups. COMPANY administers the backup schedule in reference to industry practices and recommendations as well as COMPANY’s internal operations, and as such, schedules ma y be adjusted and updated without notice. No point-in-time data recovery is available. CLIENT may not request adjustment to the COMPANY data backup schedule, and COMPANY shall not grant any such request. If CLIENT deems the backup schedule or availability to the database is unacceptable, the CLIENT’s sole remedy will be to discontinue using the service provided by COMPANY, at which point COMPANY will provide CLIENT with a copy of their data. If in the event that the CLIENT data needs to be recovered from a backup, COMPANY reserves the right to charge then-current time and materials charges to CLIENT for both the recovery and any rework to get the data back to a current, workable state. If in the event that none of the backups are able to restore CLIENT’s database, CLIENT’s sole remedy will be to discontinue using the service provided by the COMPANY or pay then-current time and materials charges to COMPANY to re-collect the necessary information and re-load the database. 8.37 Municipal Advisor The COMPANY is not a Municipal Advisor registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) as defined in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. When the CLIENT is a municipal entity as defined by said Act, and the CLIENT requires project financing information for the services performed under this AGREEMENT, the CLIENT will provide the COMPANY with a letter detailing who their independent registered municipal advisor is and that the CLIENT will rely on the advice of such advisor. A sample letter can be provided to the CLIENT upon request. This AGREEMENT is approved and accepted by the CLIENT and COMPANY upon both parties signing and dating the AGREEMENT. Services will not begin until COMPANY receives a signed agreement. COMPANY’s services shall be limited to those expressly set forth in this AGREEMENT and COMPANY shall have no other obligations or responsibilities for the Project except as agreed to in writing. The effective date of the AGREEMENT shall be the last date entered below. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. Professional Services Agreement Arden Manor and Floral Parks Playground Equipment Replacement and Reconstruction Design and Construction Administration Services November 10, 2021 Page 14 of 14 Version2.3 02052021 John Morast, PE – Regional Director Author Name Approved by: Printed/Typed Name: Title: Date: City of Arden Hills, MN Accepted by: Printed/Typed Name: Title: Date: Morast Thoreen Horejsi Osborn Thayer Harrington Rusten Krukowski Chouanard Styczen McCaslin Schaub Krook$245 $235 $160 $183 $217 $232 $130 $124 $136 $130 $175 $129 $941 SURVEY SERVICES$7,374Boundary and Topographic Survey - Sub Consultant0 $0Boundary and Topographic Drawing2810 $1,408Wetland Delineation & Permitting232 34 $5,9662 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT$4,654Public Survey1012 22 $3,478Open House - Arden Manor Park2 2 26 $1,1763 CONCEPTUAL PARK DESIGN & LAYOUT$14,418RCWD Grant Application41014 $1,972Conceptual Plans1 2 2 42029 $4,519EOPCC22 26 $828Review Meeting1 2 25 $931GDBG Grant Management1 44 9 $1,261NEPA Environmental Checklist116 17 $3,045Meetings (50%/90%) 2 4 410 $1,8624 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS$20,034Construction Plans6 4 6 32 32 686 $12,286Specifications1 2 1 4 412 $1,764EOPCC12 25 $753QAQC2 2 48 $1,784Progress Meetings (2)1 2 25 $931RCWD Permit Application410 418 $2,5165 BIDDING ASSISTANCE$1,718Bid Advertisement22 $320Bid questions/opening1 12 $405Bid Review/Award Recommendation 1 12 $405Pre Bid Meeting1 1 13 $5886CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION$23,113Construction Observation140 140 $18,060 $165Construction Meetings3 6 615 $2,793CDBG Reporting2 65 13 $2,0957 Sub Consultant Services - Kaskaskia Engineering$9,850Topographic Survey0 $5,000Construction Survey0 $4,850TOTAL21 10 45 36 10 4 40 28 64 6 48 145 16 473 $80,996 $165$81,161 FEE SCHEDULEPREPARED BY - HR GREEN, INC. LABOR HOURSLABOR COSTTOTALSCOPE OF WORKArden Hills - Arden Manor & Floral Park - Design and ConstructionREIMBURSABLE EXPENSES DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Appointment of Steve Thorp to the Building Official Position Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: •Appointment of Steve Thorp to the position of Building Official at Grade 15 Step 9 on the City’s pay scale, and at 37 months on the PTO scale, or seven hours per pay period. All other normal benefits apply. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Discussion Steve Thorp was the finalist of three candidates for the Building Official position. He has a plethora of experience as Building Official, and has worked for cities such as, Blaine, Scandia and Mounds View as a Building Inspector or Building Official. Most recently he has worked as a consultant serving a number of smaller cities performing Building Official work. Mr. Thorp also has been approved by the State of Minnesota to work on State funded projects. Budget Impact This position is a previously budgeted position and will not adversely affect the 2021 budget. Attachment N/A Page 1 CONSENT ITEM – 6E MEMORANDUM Page 1 DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Authorize the City Administrator to Purchase Recycling Carts Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A $20,000 Recycling Fund Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Authorize the City Administrator to enter into an agreement with Cascade Engineering to purchase recycling carts not to exceed $20,000. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Discussion Republic Services has informed the City that our inventory of 32 gallon and 64 gallon recycling carts is running low (less than a hundred of either size in inventory). The City last ordered carts in 2018. The City has traditionally ordered carts about every three years or so as carts begin to run low. The original recommendation from Republic was the City order 500 64 gallon carts and 300 32 gallon carts; however, based on previous orders, the City would recommend reducing that order by half. There are no price breaks by quantity, so if a reduced order is not sufficient the City could place an order for more carts as needed. The attached invoice was for the full amount recommended by Republic, this is NOT what will ultimately be approved, but is representative of the costs per cart as quoted by Cascade. Budget Impact New carts are not currently programmed into the Recycling Budget, and reserves have traditionally been used to purchase carts. Again, reserves will used to purchase these carts. Since recycling fees have already been set for 2022, the fees for 2023 and beyond should be adjusted to reflect future cart ordering. The current cash amount in the Recycling Fund is approximately $111,000 and this would be reduced by $20,000 at the most should this be approved. Although this is a short-term reduction, the budget will need to be adjusted in the future to reflect cart ordering. Attachment Attachment A: Quote from Cascade Engineering for Recycling Carts CONSENT ITEM – 6F MEMORANDUM ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 13 NEW BUSINESS – 9A MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case # 21-025 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Scannell Properties, LLC Property Location: 4200 Round Lake Road Request: Site Plan Review Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following: Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Planning Case 21-025 for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC to install an additional parking area for tenants of the 250,000 square foot office and warehousing facility. This parking area was previously identified as proof of parking during the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval. Approval of a Site Plan Review requires an affirmative vote of three councilmembers. Background 1. Overview of Request Scannell Properties was approved Resolution 2020-045 (Attachment G) for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) subject to 35 conditions on October 12, 2020 that was part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the subject property in order to operate a warehouse use in the facility to be constructed. The approximate 21 acre site is located south of the cul-de-sac on Gateway Boulevard and north of Interstate 694 and east of 35W. The Subject Property had been vacant since 2006 with wetlands located adjacent to Interstates (“35W and 694”). The site is highly visible from 694 and 35W. Separate access points to the site are provided via Gateway Boulevard for employee parking and deliveries. The site development will include office space, warehousing, ground level unloading access with 38 dock doors located on the Page 2 of 13 north side of the building, and at-grade office parking lots located on the south side of the building. One of the conditions from Resolution 2020-045 stated “Site Plan approval shall be required for the construction of the proof of parking area”. This proof of parking area was shown on Site Exhibit EX-1 (Exhibit D) as part of the PUD Review. The Applicant has a prospective tenant that will occupy 2/3rd’s of the building which also necessitates the need for construction of this future parking area. Therefore, the Applicant is pursuing the Site Plan Review for expansion of the parking area. The City Council should pay special consideration to the stormwater implications of this proposal as it is significant impacts for the site and surrounding properties. Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. Land Use Chart (GB Gateway Business District) – Section 1320.05 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided as Light Industrial and Office use. Light Industrial and Office (I/O) uses are areas designated for a broad range of light industrial uses such as warehousing with manufacturing. This land use may also include offices. According to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the expected share of uses within this area are 50 percent to 100 percent Light Industrial or up to 100 percent Office. The subject property is located in the GB, Gateway Business District. Warehouse is a conditional use in this district. 2. General Requirements - Sections 1325.05 and 1325.06 A. Parking and Site Operations – Additional Information Requested The proposed Site Plan Review is not modifying any portion of the previously approved parking lot layout. The proof of parking area was identified on these earlier plans as a supplemental parking area. It was stated that this was conceptual in the event additional parking is required to meet the demands of a future tenant. The original approval for parking spaces, drive aisles, and layout with the building construction all remain unchanged as part of this review. Under the new site plan with the additional parking area, the Applicant is proposing to establish a fourth access onto Gateway Boulevard. This new access would be classified as an employee driveway access. The Zoning Code has access/driveway width standards for streets classified as minor and collector streets. However, Gateway Boulevard is classified as neither a minor or collector roadway and instead it is identified as a municipal state aid street. The Public Works Director/City Engineer will handle review of the proposed new access with regards to number of accesses requested, spacing, and sizing of driveway width. Any new access will need to be constructed to meet municipal state aid specifications. Based on the PUD approvals, the building would be a maximum of 85 percent warehouse and a minimum of 15 percent office. Per City Code, Business & Professional Office uses must provide one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The approved plans for the building identified the office floor area as 37,500 square feet and that would require 150 parking stalls. Other Business and Industry uses would need to provide one (1) for each employee on shift plus one (1) for each vehicle used in conducting the business or one (1) for each 1,000 sq. Page 3 of 13 ft. of floor area, whichever is greater. The Applicant had shown a floor area of 212,500 square feet and that would require 212 parking stalls. In October 2020, the approved plans depicted 363 parking spaces and the proposed uses required 362 stalls. As part of the October review, the Applicant had noted the possibility of constructing the expanded parking area which would add 198 stalls. In total, the site would have 561 parking stalls. For Site Plan Review, the Applicant was asked to provide updated parking calculations based on their leased tenant and prospective tenant floor area breakdown of uses within the building. The PUD approval had calculated the required parking spaces based on a spec building of 85% warehouse area and 15% office space. However, that ratio of parking spaces necessary under the code may have changed as a result of their prospective tenant occupancy. Staff has requested this information on several occasions and has not yet received any additional data to update the City Council. It was indicated that the new tenant’s use would be considered lab-use, and the parking space calculation for warehouse area or lab space would fall under the same category as “Other Business and Industry” uses. Based on the Applicants general explanation at the Planning Commission meeting on tenant uses staff believes the following two off-street parking categories would still be applicable and the parking calculation does not change for either warehouse or lab: • Business and Industry – 1 for each employee on major shift plus 1 for each vehicle used in conducting the business or 1 for each 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater  Note: Staff requested updated parking detail to include both floor area and employee count by tenant in order to verify which equation is greater. • Business and Professional Office – 1 for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area B. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Shown The GB district requires a 50 foot setback for parking areas from public streets and ROW. As part of the platting process when the property was developed, the Applicant was required to dedicate ROW along Gateway Boulevard. The 2020 original request was for a 30 foot parking lot setback and due to ROW dedication this was modified to requesting a 20 foot setback to the parking area on the north side of the subject parcel. Under the PUD, flexibility was approved for a 20 foot setback from Gateway Boulevard for the main parking area reviewed along with the building design. The Applicant has shown a 49.4 foot setback from the west property line facing 35W and an 18.2 foot setback from the north property line facing Gateway Boulevard ROW (Note: updated site plan identifies a setback of 28.2 feet, but this includes 10 feet of ROW). The proposed parking lot expansion aligns with the placement of the previously approved parking areas along Gateway Boulevard. It was noted during the PUD review that the proposed parking areas are located approximately 50 feet from the back of curb of Gateway Boulevard. Additionally, that several properties along Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard have similar or greater reduction in parking lot setbacks. The Applicant was under the belief that the PUD approval for the parking lot setback flexibility was granted for the full width/length of the property abutting Gateway Boulevard (i.e. including the “future” parking lot expansion). They are seeking City Council clarification as to whether or not the 20 foot parking setback flexibility was granted inclusive of the “future parking area”. For this application, Site Plan Review is limited in approval of plans prepared in accordance with Page 4 of 13 city codes and previous approvals. Flexibility should not be extended to areas/elements of the project that the Council considers to be “new” and outside of the scope of the original approvals granted. If the Council did not intend to grant setback flexibility to the “future parking area” under the PUD approval than the Applicant would be required to amend the site plans to adhere to a 50 foot setback or apply for a PUD Amendment to seek flexibility to the city code requirements. As a preemptive measure in case the setback flexibility was not intended to extend to the future parking area, Planning Staff has included a recommended condition of approval that an amended site plan that complies with parking setbacks would be required for Zoning Department approval prior to issuance of permits. C. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Applicant has submitted a lighting plan that identifies pole heights and lumen levels at the property lines. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style and downward directed with flush lenses. The Applicant is proposing to use the same LED lighting to illuminate the parking areas as previously approved. Consistent with the previous approval, Staff recommends reiteration of the condition that all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. D. Trees along Street Frontage – Meets Requirements A minimum of one tree shall be provided along the right of way for every 50 feet of public street frontage. The proposed frontage on Gateway Boulevard is 1,484 feet and requires 30 trees. The Applicant had shown the planting of 71 trees along the right of way adjacent to Gateway Boulevard as part of the PUD review. The updated landscaping plan for Site Plan Review has been reduced to 60 trees to be planted along Gateway Boulevard. E. Minimum Caliper Inches – Flexibility Granted Tree mitigation was not required as the current site had no trees deemed significant per City Code. The Zoning Code requires that a minimum number of caliper inches of trees be provided based on the gross square footage of the building on the property. A single story building in excess of thirty (30) feet in height shall be considered a two-story building for the purposes of determining gross square footage. The proposed building would be considered a two-stories, and includes 499,552 gross square feet. This requires a minimum of 1,561 caliper inches or 624 two and a half (2.5) caliper trees. Flexibility was granted from this requirement as part of the previous approvals for the building construction. It was noted that the proposed site is limited to where trees can be planted onsite due the wetlands and overhead power lines. The Applicant was approved for the planting of 410 caliper inches or 141 trees. For Site Plan Review of the parking lot expansion, the Planning Commission recommended as a condition that the Applicant be required to verify the caliper inches of trees to be planted and if necessary submit an updated landscaping plan reflective of the minimum caliper inches approved under the PUD. On November 17th, Staff received an updated landscaping plan for the Site Plan Review which identifies a planting of 423 caliper inches or 137 trees. There are generally three noticeable areas where the planting of trees has been modified from the original approval. Page 5 of 13 The planting schedule (i.e. species and size) for Site Plan Review is consistent with the previously approved landscape plan minus the installation of Colorado Spruce and Eastern Red Cedar trees. The Applicant has provided a supplemental narrative for further clarification on the calculation breakdown of caliper inches shown within the updated landscape plan. The Applicant is seeking approval of the updated landscaping plan in satisfaction of the caliper inches to be planted as part of the Site Plan Review process. October 2020 CUP/PUD Approval: Proposed Site Plan Review: Page 6 of 13 F. Parking Islands – Flexibility Shown Zoning Code requires that planting islands shall occupy at least ten (10) percent of the parking area. Planting islands shall be edged with concrete curbs. In addition, parking lot planting islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet in area, be of appropriate width and length, and include at least one tree meeting the requirements of this ordinance. As part of the PUD approval, the Applicant had received flexibility on this requirement. The table below compares the city code requirements to the landscaping plan approval as part of the PUD and the Applicants request as part of the Site Plan Review. The Applicant has reversed the code requirements of where flexibility is sought as part of the Site Plan Review (i.e. from 10% to trees). Similarly to the parking lot setback, the Applicant is requesting City Council consideration under the Site Plan Review to continue to allow flexibility from Section 1325.05, Subd. 1, F.7 for Parking Islands in overall terms of the code provision rather than requiring the need to apply for a PUD Amendment. Staff has informed the Applicant that this may be considered outside of the scope of the original approval. Planning Staff has included a recommended condition of approval that an amended site plan that complies with parking island requirements under Section 1325.05, Subd. 1, F.7, Landscaping Minimum Requirements be provided to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of permits. G. Tree Selection – Meets Requirements The proposed updated landscape plan includes a variety of tree species, including maples, oaks and evergreens, ranging in size from two and half (2.5) to six (6) caliper inches. This is consistent with ordinance requirements. The Applicant is proposing to plant six (6) to twelve (12) foot tall evergreens. H. Landscaped Area and Perennials and Shrubberies – Flexibility Granted Zoning Code requires 35 percent of the site to be landscaped or 339,674 square feet for this site. The Zoning Code additionally requires a minimum of 10 percent of the total landscaped area to be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The total landscaped area on the site is 652,668 square feet, resulting in the need for a minimum of 65,266 square feet of perennial and shrubbery cover. The Applicant has been approved for 2,888 square feet (857 plants) of perennial and shrub planting beds. In addition, the Applicant was approved for the use of over 170,000 square feet of Mesic Prairie seed mix onsite. Mesic Prairie is a prairie plant community dominated by native grasses such as big bluestem, switchgrasses and including abundant wildflowers. The updated landscaping plan shows the perimeter of the proposed parking lot expansion would still be planted with the Mesic Prairie seed mix, but that area has been reduced down to 43,545 Parking Lot Area 10% Parking Island Proposed Parking Island Area Required Planting Island Trees Proposed Planting Island Trees PUD Approval – Oct. 2020 111,769 sq. ft. 11,177 sq. ft. 6,178 sq. ft. 33 34 Site Plan Review - 2021 179,395 sq. ft. 17,940 sq. ft. 18,444 sq. ft. 44 41 Page 7 of 13 square feet as a result of the additional parking. In addition, the updated plan provides for 9,234 square feet of perennials and shrubs by adding an additional 455 plants mainly within the proposed expanded parking area. The types of plantings are a variety of species consistent with the previously approved landscape plan. I. Drainage Wetlands and Flood Plain – Section 1325.05 Subd. 2 – Meets Requirements Subject to Recommended Conditions The City Code requires stormwater management be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration, and water quality requirements. The project was previously approved for construction of three (3) stormwater ponds. The first pond is located in the middle of the loading area. The other two (2) ponds were to be located adjacent to 694 and 35W. The proposed parking lot expansion would be constructed in the general area of the previously identified pond adjacent to 35W. It was noted in the October 2020 Staff Report that when the proof of parking stalls are needed that the Applicant would need to construct an underground retention area in the same area to replace the existing stormwater pond located adjacent to 35W. The Applicant as part of this Site Plan Review is proposing to construct an underground retention system. The Public Works Director/City Engineer has completed the initial review of the underground retention system design and infiltration rates with regards to potential impacts of existing wetlands, public versus private runoff, and access to nearby utilities and easements. The parking lot expansion from a zoning review may seem simplistic, but that far be the case from a Public Works/Engineering standpoint given the complexity of this design and parking lot location with the logistics of easements, wetlands, and stormwater maintenance. Planning Staff has included reference to the Public Works Director/City Engineer preliminary comments under Additional Review and as a recommended condition of approval. This comment letter was given to the Applicant and they have indicated they are working to prepare responses and/or plan revisions necessary to address these items. In addition, the Applicant has indicated that the updated site plans and underground retention systems plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District, but they have not received a comment review letter or approval from the Watershed. Therefore, Planning Staff recommends City Council consideration of a condition of Site Plan Review would be subject to approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Lastly, it should be noted that upon the determination of the Public Works Director/City Engineer that the proposed plans would be compliant then the Applicant would be required to apply for a separate land disturbance permit for construction of the parking expansion area. This work may not be completed under any of the previously issued permits for this project. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit for the parking lot expansion area, the Applicant shall submit an amended operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all onsite stormwater facilities subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Staff has made multiple requests from the Applicant for submittal of an amended stormwater maintenance plan for Engineering/PW review. The Applicant has indicated at the time of writing this report that this plan is not yet complete. The stormwater maintenance plan will also require review of the City Attorney prior to approval of the City Council. This agreement needs to be fully executed prior to issuance of the land disturbance permit. Page 8 of 13 3. Easements The Subject Parcel was required to dedicate several easements as part of the platting process with the subdivision of land that occurred as part of the approvals for construction of the new building. The City required dedication of drainage and utility easements over the existing wetlands on the property. In addition, the Subject Parcel has a Utility Easement and Power Line Easement in the general area of where the proposed parking lot expansion is to be located. The Applicant has indicated that following approval of the Site Plan that they would subsequently apply for an easement vacation and/or dedicate any new easements as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director/City Engineer for utility purposes. Planning Staff has included as a recommended condition the requirement for vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to the issuance of any land disturbance permits. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the GB, Gateway Business District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed parking expansion: Ordinance Requirements GB District Standards PUD Approval Proposed Development Off-Street Parking Setbacks 50 feet from ROW Flexibility Previously Granted Flexibility Shown - 20 feet Lighting Downward Directed Meets Requirements Trees Along Road Frontage Every 50 feet of public street frontage – i.e. 31 trees 60 trees Minimum Caliper Inches Based on Building Size – i.e. 1,561 Flexibility Previously Granted 423 caliper inches or 137 trees Proposed Parking Expansion Page 9 of 13 caliper inches or 624 trees Parking Islands 10% of parking area – i.e. 17,940 square feet Flexibility Previously Granted 18,444 square feet Parking Island Trees 1 per parking island – i.e. 44 Flexibility Shown - 41 trees Tree Selection Minimum size at planting – Deciduous: 2.5 caliper inches Coniferous: 6 ft height Meets Requirements Landscape Area 35% of site – i.e. 399,755 square feet 573,685 square feet Perennials and Shrubs 10% of landscape area – i.e. 65,266 square feet Flexibility Previously Granted 9,234 square feet Drainage/Stormwater Mgmt Conversion to Underground Retention System Subject to several Recommended Conditions In recap, the City Council for the Site Plan Review should decide if the flexibility granted under the approved PUD also applies to the Site Plan Review for the new parking and if the minimum code requirements would not apply, or does the proposed parking addition need to meet the minimum code requirements. For example, the additional parking does not have trees planted in the parking islands in satisfaction of the minimum standards as proposed, but would be required under code requirements. The minimum requirements that require Council direction are as follows: • Parking Setbacks • Minimum Caliper Inches • Parking Island Trees • Perennials and Shrubs 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications Section 1355.04, Subd. 5 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code states that a public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review, but neighboring property owners shall be notified. Notification was prepared in accordance with City policy. Additional Review Building Inspector The Building Inspector has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. City code states that a building permit shall be required in such case where a commercial, industrial, public or semi-public land use is intending to construct on-site parking containing a site aggregate of more than four (4) spaces or a loading facility that is not a part of, or has prior approval as part of a site plan for which a building permit has been issued. Construction is underway for the office/warehouse building. Therefore, a building permit will be required prior to any construction taking place of the expanded parking lot area. Page 10 of 13 Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and provided the Engineering Comment Letter dated November 5, 2021 for City Council review. The Applicant is currently finalizing their response to address these comments. The November 5, 2021 comment letter shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Suggested Findings of Fact: The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their November 3, 2021, meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration: General Findings: 1. The Applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan Review to construct additional parking previously identified as “proof of parking” at the subject property 4200 Round Lake Road. 2. The Subject Property is located with the Gateway Business (“GB”) District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the 2040 Land Use Plan. 3. The Applicant operates under a Master Planned Unit Development and has been approved for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility on the Subject Property. 4. Flexibility through the PUD process was granted in the following areas: parking setbacks, minimum caliper inches, and perennials and shrubberies. 5. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. 6. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 7. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 8. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions. 9. The accessory off-street parking would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning Code. 10. A public hearing for a Site Plan Review is not required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 11. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and provided a recommendation on November 3, 2021. Options and Motion Language The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their November 3, 2021 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of the Scannell Properties, LLC application for Site Plan Review by a 5-0 vote. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider. Approval with Conditions: Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21- 025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the November 22, 2021 Report to the City Council, subject to the following conditions: Page 11 of 13 1) All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2) That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3) The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 4) A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion. 5) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system. 6) All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 7) A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 8) A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 9) All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 10) A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 11) The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 12) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 13) An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be presented to the City Engineer for review by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit. Page 12 of 13 14) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering Comment Letter dated November 5, 2021 shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. Including installation of any new access to the expanded parking area being constructed in accordance with municipal state aid specifications. 15) Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area. 16) The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of setback flexibility as shown. 17) The Applicant shall be required to verify the caliper inches of trees to be planted and if necessary submit an updated landscaping plan reflective of the minimum caliper inches approved under the PUD. 18) The Applicant shall confirm tenant uses in conformance with Arden Hills parking standards and provide an explanation for spaces in excess of code requirements. 19) The Applicant shall submit an amended landscaping plan that complies with parking island requirements under Section 1325.05, Subd. 1, F.7, Landscaping Minimum Requirements to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of permits. Approval without Conditions: Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21- 025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the November 22, 2021 Report to the City Council. Denial: Motion to deny Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the following findings of fact: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. Table: Motion to table Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road for the following reasons: the City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice and Comments The City Council is not required to hold a public hearing for a Site Plan Review. Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out on November 10, 2021. The mailing was sent to neighbors within 500 feet of the subject parcel. No comments have been received regarding this application. Deadline for Agency Action The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 6, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by December 4, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review Page 13 of 13 period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Resolution 2021-066 B. Land Use Application C. Location Map D. Site Plans E. Landscape Narrative F. Engineer Comment Letter G. Resolution 2020-045 H. Planning Commission Memo I. Draft Planning Commission Minutes J. Presentation To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021-066 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 4200 ROUND LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, City Staff received a land use application for 4200 Round Lake Road (“Subject Property”) for a Site Plan Review on October 6, 2021; WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the GB – Gateway Business Zoning District and is guided as Light Industrial and Office in the Land Use plan; WHEREAS, the Subject Property’s use as office and warehouse was previously approved under a Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development (“Planning Case No. 20-010”); WHEREAS, a Site Plan Review is required for construction of the proof of parking area as an approved condition of the Conditional Use Permit; WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to install the expanded parking area for use by tenants of the building; WHEREAS, Subject Property meets the special district provisions for the GB District to operate an office and warehouse use; WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 500 feet of Subject Property when a request for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that does not require a public hearing; WHEREAS, the City’s obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission reviewed the application on November 3, 2021. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant’s request for a Site Plan Review and, as such voted 5-0 in favor of the recommending approval with conditions. To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2021-066 approving Planning Case 21-025 for a Site Plan Review at the Subject Property 4200 Round Lake Road to install an additional parking area which was previously identified as proof of parking during the Conditional Use Permit approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council approves Planning Case 21-025 for a Site Plan Review at the Subject Property 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans and November 22, 2021 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: 1) All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2) That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3) The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 4) A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion. 5) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system. 6) All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 7) A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 8) A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 9) All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 10) A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 11) The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 3 12) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 13) An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be presented to the City Engineer for review by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit. 14) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering Comment Letter dated November 5, 2021 shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 15) Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area. 16) The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of setback flexibility as shown. 17) The Applicant shall be required to verify the caliper inches of trees to be planted and if necessary submit an updated landscaping plan reflective of the minimum caliper inches approved under the PUD. 18) The Applicant shall confirm tenant uses in conformance with Arden Hills parking standards and provide an explanation for spaces in excess of code requirements. 19) The Applicant shall submit an amended landscaping plan that complies with parking island requirements under Section 1325.05, Subd. 1, F.7, Landscaping Minimum Requirements to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021. ___________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Page 1 of 3 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.cityofardenhills.org For Office Use Only Planning Case No. 21- Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2021 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant: Address: Telephone No.: Other: Fax No.: Email Address: Property Information Property Owner: Owner Address: Owner Telephone No. Other: Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: Property ID No.: Type of Use: Zone: Property Acreage: Type of Request Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Fee: $550 + Escrow: $2,500) Conditional Use or Interim Use Permit/CUP or IUP Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Preliminary Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Plat (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,000) Concept Plan Review (Fee: $300 + Escrow: $750)Master Planned Unit Development or Master Special Development Plan (Fee: $600 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Planned Unit Development or Final Special Development Plan (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $2,000) Planned Unit Development Amendment or Special Development Plan Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow:$1,500) Site Plan Review (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,500) Rezoning or TCAAP Regulating Plan Amendment (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500) Zoning Code or TCAAP Redevelopment Code Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) City Code Amendment (Fee: $350 + Escrow:$1,500) Lot Split/Minor Subdivision (R-1 and R-2 Districts Only) (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500)Variance or Permitted Adjustment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,000) Vacation of Easement or Right-of-W ay (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Appeal of Administrative Decision (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified (Fee:$150 + Escrow: $1,000 Scannell Properties #486, LLC 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 317-843-5957 4200 Round Lake Rd, Arden Hills, MN 55112 Lot 1, Block 1 of Gateway Interstate Parking x Scannell Properties #486, LLC (c/o Dan Salzer) 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 763-331-8854 dans@scannellproperties.com 213023310034 21.94 Acres Page 2 of 3 Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaining the project): Filing & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional application requirements can be found at www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications. Complete/Incomplete Applications Under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 15.99, cities have 15 business days to review all plans and application materials to ensure they satisfy City requirements. During the 15 day review period, planning staff will provide written comments on the application and may request plan revisions. If the application is determined to be complete, Minnesota State Statute then requires the City to approve or deny the application within 60 days, up to 120 days. If not complete, the City may require plan revisions and/or additional information before the application is scheduled for Planning Commission review and/or City Council action. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. Payment of Fees and Escrows The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Each separate land use request shall be charged a separate administrative fee and escrow even if submitted on the same application. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include planning and engineering staff time, City Attorney and consulting fees, and mailing costs. If, at any time, a required cash escrow is depleted to less than 20 percent of its original amount, the applicant shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all fees have been paid. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. The escrow may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis. Notice of Meeting Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. *IMPORTANT* •Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398-3070 for additional information. •The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. •All applications will be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of consultant costs associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of application in the form of an escrow to the City. A tenant has been identified with a larger number of employees than anticipated during the original Gateway Interstate Site Plan. This additional parking was reviewed conceptually in conjunction with the original site plan application and will support this tenants needs. Page 3 of 3 Meeting Schedule Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday of each month at 6:30 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. The schedules below are for reference purposes only. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. 2021 Planning Commission and City Council Schedule (*subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday at 6:30 p.m.) TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the fourth Monday at 7:00 p.m.) January 6 January 25 February 3 February 22 March 3 March 22 April 7 April 26 May 5 May 24 June 9 June 21 July 7 July 26 August 4 August 2 3 September 8 September 27 October 6 October 2 5 November 3 November 22 December 8 January 10 (2022) January 5 (2022) January 24 (2022) Acknowledgement and Signature I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate per city code and ordinance requirements. I fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. __________________________________________________ ________________ Property Owner Signature (Required) Date ________________________________________________ ________________ Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date Please contact the City Planner at 651-792-7800 if you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City’s website: www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications 10/4/2021 Location Map Tax Parcels _Query result Personal Property Tax Parcels Cities County Offices 10/27/2021, 3:20:03 PM 0 0.15 0.30.07 mi 0 0.25 0.50.13 km 1:8,000 Ramsey County Ramsey County MN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35WGATEWAY BLVD.UP7 4 . 8 '127.9'263.7' 94.4' 205.0' 76. 1 'LOT #121.94 AC240.0'275.0'311.0'275.3'240.0'LOT #23.43 ACPROVIDE PERMANENT TYPE 3 BARRICADEWHERE EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKS WEREREMOVED, EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE TOREMAIN FOR SERVICE TO MCES SEWERMETER31.8'18.0'24.0'18.0'10.5'365.0'490.0'365.0'242724202020202020929EXISTING OVERHEADPOWEREXISTING 130' UTILITYEASEMENTEXISTING PONDINGEASEMENT TO BEVACATEDEXISTINGSANITARYSEWEREXISTING 30'SANITARYEASEMENTNOT A PART OF THISREVIEW, REFERENCERESOLUTION NO.2020-045K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg October 28, 2021 - 9:49am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEETBRJBRJ/LEC/DSS71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114CALEB J. FLAKE58751DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN04/07/2021NORTHC100 OVERALL SITEPLANBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC)BUILDING AREA250,000 SF (22.9% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 SFPREVIOUSLY APPROVED PARKING363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 RATIOPROPOSED PARKING ADDITION198 STALLSTOTAL PARKING PROPOSED561 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYGATEWAY INTERSTATETOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC)PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPERVIOUS AREA11.43 ACPREVIOUSLY APPROVED PERVIOUS AREA14.79 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA13.05 ACPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA13.17 ACZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGGATEWAY BUSINESSDISTRICTPROPOSED ZONINGGATEWAY BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 03/18/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 26.220 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.16. THERE ARE 1.485 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/06/2021UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT1 CITY COMMENTS 10/28/2021November 2021 Site Plan Review - Overall Site Plan 111189223142293ABCD123452427242020202020209BUILDING250,000 S.F.FFE: 898.50DOCK YARD: 894.50R10 .0 'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R10.0'R10.0'R3.0'R3.0'R10.0'R3.0'R4.5'R4.5'R5.0'20.0'24.0'24.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'20.0'13.3'9.0'9.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'49.4'6.1'0BHHHHBBIINOT A PART OF THISREVIEW, REFERENCERESOLUTION NO.2020-045UNDERGROUND 120" PERFORATED CMP WITHSAND FILTRATION, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTVOLUME: 447,500 CFWQVREQ: 81,820 CFWQVPROV: 89,146 CFTOP: 892.9100-YR WSE: 892.64BOTTOM CMP: 882.9BOTTOM SAND: 881.4IIIII28.2' 24.0'53.6'40.7'K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\Expanded Parking\C4-SITE PLAN BLOW UP.dwg October 28, 2021 - 9:50am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEETBRJBRJ/LEC/DSS71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114CALEB J. FLAKE58751DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN04/07/2021NORTHC101 ENLARGED SITEPLANPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 03/18/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 26.220 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.16. THERE ARE 1.485 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.KEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTTIP-OUT GUTTERTRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONTRANSFORMER PADEXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE; LOCATION APPROXIMATE -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDREINSTALLED STREET LIGHT POLE ; COORD. W/ CITY OF ARDEN HILLSEXISTING SIGN; LOCATION APPROXIMATE - CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY LOCATION IN FIELDREINSTALLED EXISTING SIGNNO PARKING SIGNBOLLARD, TYP.ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVSITE PLAN REVIEW 10/06/2021UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT1 CITY COMMENTS 10/28/2021November 2021 Site Plan Review - Site Plan CONIFEROUS TREECODECOMMON NAMEAUP AUSTRIAN PINEBHS BLACK HILLS SPRUCESCP* SCOTCH PINEWHP WHITE PINEORNAMENTAL TREECODECOMMON NAMEPFC PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLEQUA QUAKING ASPENQUC+ QUAKING ASPEN CLUMPRVB+ RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKTCH THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORNOVERSTORY TREECODECOMMON NAMEABM AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEFFM* SUGAR MAPLEKTC KENTUCKY TRUE COFFEETREENWM* NORTHWOOD MAPLERDL REDMOND AMERICAN LINDENRDO* RED OAKSWO* SWAMP WHITE OAKULC PRAIRIE EXPEDITION ELMPLANT KEYNOTE: SEE SHEET L105 FOR LANDSCAPE SCHEDULESEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)22-11225-13133-26133-26233-36134-17135-22135-24136-211ABCDEFLANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)LANDSCAPE LEGENDEDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35WGATEWAY BLVD.RETAININGWALLDD35-241DDD35-24135-24135-24135-24125-131D35-24135-24125-13125-131DDDC33-26135-24135-24135-24133-26225-13133-26235-24125-13135-24135-24135-241DDDD25-1311 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - TCH1 - SWO*2 - TCH2 - SWO*2 - PFC2 - RDL3 - PFC2 - NWM*3 - QUC+5 - WHP2 - RDO*3 - SCP*2 - FFM*3 - RVB+5 - BHS3 - QUC+3 - RVB+2 - FFM*3 - SCP*2 - RDO*5 - WHP1 - NWM*2 - BHS2 - QUC+3 - AUP1 - ABM3 - RVB+3 - RVB+1 - ABM3 - AUP3 - AUP3 - BHS3 - AUP1 - RVB+1 - RVB+2 - ABM1 - RDL1 - RDL2 - RVB+2 - RVB+6 - BHS2 - KTC4 - KTC1 - RDL1 - ABM1 - QUA2 - NWM*1 - NWM*1 - TCH1 - ULCDSEE SHEET L101SEE SHEET L102SEE SHEET L103SEE SHEET L104K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\Arden Hills, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg November 17, 2021 - 11:22am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALRYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA53828LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.RAHRAH/ BPS1 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 03/10/2020GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN10/06/20212 EXPANDED PARKING 10/14/20213 NCM RFI 3 11/12/20214 PLANNING COMMENT 11/12/2021MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA REQUIRED: 399,755 SF1,142,156 SF LOT AREA *0.35LANDSCAPE LOT AREA PROVIDED: 573,685 SFTREE RATIO (BUILDING STORIES: 2)SIZE:6-7' HT 8-10' HT 11-14' HT(2.5-3") (3.5-4") (4.5-6")REQUIRED: 50% 30% 20%PROPOSED: 50% 30% 20%LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSSTREET TREES REQUIRED - GATEWAY BLVD: 30 TREES1484 LF / 50 =STREET TREES PROVIDED - GATEWAY BLVD: 60 TREESPERENNIALS/SHRUB AREA REQUIRED: 57,368 SF573,685 SF LANDSCAPE AREA * 0.1 =PERENNIAL/SHRUB AREA PROVIDED: 9,234 SFREQUIRED PLANTING ISLANDS (MINIMUM 150 SF): 17,940 SF179,395 SF PARKING AREA *0.1PROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 18,444 SF(MINIMUM 150 SF)REQUIRED PLANTING ISLAND TREES: 44 TREES44 PLANTING ISLANDS x 1 TREEPROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 41 TREESDIVERSE SELECTION REQUIRED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY,ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTDIVERSE SELECTION PROVIDED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY,ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTSCREENING REQUIRED - LOAD SERVICE: MAY INCLUDE A COMBINATIONOF THE FOLLOWING - BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTHCONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED.NATURAL MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND ATMATURITY.SCREENING PROVIDED- LOAD SERVICE: A COMBINATION OF BERMS,SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHTAND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED. PLANT MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED: 1,563 IN.500,000 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE / 320*MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED: 423.5 IN.*A SINGLE STORY BUILDING IN EXCESS OF THIRTY (30) FEET IN HEIGHTSHALL BE CONSIDERED A TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSESOF DETERMINING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE.LANDSCAPE PLANNORTH24November 2021 Site Plan Review - Landscape Plan CONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEAUP 12PINUS NIGRAAUSTRIAN PINEB & B6` HT.BHS 16PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCEB & B6` HT.SCP* 6PINUS SYLVESTRISSCOTCH PINEB & B12` HT.WHP 10PINUS STROBUSWHITE PINEB & B6` HT.ORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEPFC 5MALUS X `PRAIRIFIRE`PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLEB & B 2.5" CAL.QUA 5POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPENB & B 2.5" CAL.QUC+ 8POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN CLUMPB & B8` HT.RVB+ 24BETULA NIGRARIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKB & B8` HT.TCH 7CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS TMTHORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN B & B 2.5" CAL.OVERSTORY TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEABM 9ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEB & B 2.5" CAL.FFM* 4ACER SACCHARUM `FALL FIESTA`SUGAR MAPLEB & B 4.5" CAL.KTC 6GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `UMNSYNERGY`KENTUCKY TRUE COFFEETREEB & B 2.5" CAL.NWM* 6ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLEB & B 4.5" CAL.RDL 8TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND`REDMOND AMERICAN LINDENB & B 2.5" CAL.RDO* 4QUERCUS RUBRARED OAKB & B 4.5" CAL.SWO* 3QUERCUS BICOLORSWAMP WHITE OAKB & B 4.5" CAL.ULC 4ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK`PRAIRIE EXPEDITION ELMB & B 2.5" CAL.CONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBFJ 53JUNIPERUS SABINA `BUFFALO`BUFFALO JUNIPER#5 CONT. 5` O.C.GOJ 31JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER#5 CONT. 4` O.C.NYW 15TAXUS CUSPIDATA `NOVA`NOVA YEW#5 CONT. 3` O.C.SGJ 51JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER#5 CONT. 5` O.C.DECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBLC 18ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4` O.C.CSC 69CORNUS SERICEA `CARDINAL`CARDINAL DOGWOOD#5 CONT. 4` O.C.DBH 123DIERVILLA LONICERADWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#5 CONT. 3` O.C.GGD 8CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW`GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD#5 CONT. 5` O.C.GLS 8RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC#5 CONT. 4` O.C.NIN 14PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUSNINEBARK#5 CONT. 5` O.C.RGD 8CORNUS ALBA SIBIRICA `RED GNOME`RED GNOME DOGWOOD#5 CONT. 4` O.C.SOS 25AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK`STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRY #5 CONT.4` HT.SPN 14SALIX PURPUREA `NANA`DWARF ARCTIC WILLOW#5 CONT. 4` O.C.PERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGAJS 132SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY`AUTUMN JOY SEDUM#1 CONT18" OCBGT 35BAPTISIA X `GRAPE TAFFY`GRAPE TAFFY BAPTISIA#1 CONT. 24" O.C.BJB 66PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA `BLUE JEAN BABY` BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGE#1 CONT.36" OCCNM 6OSMUNDA CINNAMOMEACINNAMON FERN#1 CONT.36" O.C.KFG 61CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT30" OCKSM 35ECHINACEA X `TNECHKY`KISMET YELLOW CONEFLOWER#1 CONT.24" O.C.MSY 30ACHILLEA X `MOONSHINE`MOONSHINE YARROW#1 CONT.24" O.C.NWS 52PANICUM VIRGATUM `NORTHWIND`NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS#1 CONT.24" O.C.OCT 170ANDROPOGON GERARDII `RED OCTOBER`RED OCTOBER BIG BLUESTEM5 GAL24" O.C.PCA 64ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE`PURPLE CANDLES ASTILBE#1 CONT.36" O.C.PDS 109SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPISPRAIRIE DROPSEED#1 CONT24" OCPSG 115PANICUM VIRGATUM `SHENANDOAH`SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS#1 CONT. 24" O.C.GRASS/SEEDCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACING25-131 2,115 SFLOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX FLAT33-261 5,718 SFSTORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX FLAT33-262 29,952 SFDRY SWALE/POND SEED MIXFLAT35-241 43,545 SFMESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX FLATSOD 24,600 SFSOD-PLANT SCHEDULE\\kimley-horn.com\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\Arden Hills, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG November 12, 2021 - 9:59am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALRYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA53828LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.RAHRAH/ BPS1 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 03/10/2020GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN10/06/20212 EXPANDED PARKING 10/14/20213 NCM RFI 3 11/12/20214 PLANNING COMMENT 11/12/2021LANDSCAPE DETAILS,NOTES, & SCHEDULEDOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHNOTES:2X ROOT BALL WIDTHSOD4" TOPSOILPREPARED PLANTING BED ANDBACKFILL SOIL(THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES:1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT.3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECTAND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEMGIRDLING ROOTS.4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILLVOIDS.6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESSSOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST.1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ORTHOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL.INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UPTO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAPAND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6"INTERVALS.5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THETOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT.REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOPTWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROMTHE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE.REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS.6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TOSETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER.PLANTING SOILON CENTER SPACINGAS STATED ON PLAN.EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTHA MINIMUM OF 6" BEYONDTHE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.FINISHED GRADEEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDTREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1051SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.31/2"FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER.LAWN SIDE"BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BYVALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO.USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USEKNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDEANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHORSTAKES AT 48" O.C., AND ATCHANGES.EACH END.PLASTIC DIVIDER:FINISHED GRADE ATSHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOPOF DIVIDER.PLANTING BED1"POLY EDGER DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1054SPADED EDGE DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1056MULCH AT PLANTING AREASPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH,4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWNSIDELAWN GRASSFINISHED GRADEBUILDING, EXTERIOR WALLPROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGEAWAY FROM BUILDINGSPECIFIED ROCK MULCH1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIPEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDSOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUMOF 4" BELOW EDGING TOPTO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATELIP FOR MULCH.SPECIFIED SOIL MIXFINISH GRADE FOR LAWNMAINTENANCE STRIP DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L10554" 1"NOTE:1. EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPEEQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLEDIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE INHEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREASOF POOR DRAINAGE.STEEP SLOPE PLANTINGSCALE: N.T.S.L1052EXISTING GRADECUT AREAPLANT ACCORDING TOPLANTING DETAILSAPPLICABLE AS SHOWNBACKFILL AREA1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TOVERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTSOR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOSUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THEGUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONEYEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADESHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTHRATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-INMATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THETOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVEDDOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THEROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAKAPART PEAT POTS.12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POORBRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONEYEAR.15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIORTO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THENEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECTTOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGERTHAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE,SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUBPLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS.PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED DARKWALNUT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, ATMINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADEFILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS(WHERE APPLICABLE).18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGINGOR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES ANDSTAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEADAT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKSFOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TOCREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BESTANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALLTOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 ORGREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOTINDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMALPROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRSTYEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR.ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR.21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANTIS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDEWATER FOR CONTRACTOR.22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARDAREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.LANDSCAPE NOTESNOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANTQUANTITIES PER PLAN AND FIELD CONDITIONS.November 2021 Site Plan Review - Landscape Detail Gateway InterstateGateway BlvdArden Hills, MNDesignerAmber ForesterDate3/17/2021ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.L0SummaryLighting Calculations1 of 13.32.72.03.94.13.53.12.82.72.21.71.21.31.52.02.62.82.82.93.13.12.92.82.21.51.13.83.12.52.01.71.71.82.02.32.93.03.23.02.72.32.11.61.13.43.93.63.03.02.82.52.11.71.51.51.51.72.12.42.42.52.52.11.81.61.41.11.01.52.22.62.82.93.03.53.12.92.72.11.61.31.21.31.51.81.81.81.81.71.61.41.21.11.01.41.61.92.12.63.03.13.12.92.52.21.91.61.31.21.21.41.41.41.31.31.31.21.11.00.90.90.71.71.61.61.62.02.42.42.42.52.31.91.71.51.41.31.21.21.21.21.11.11.11.01.00.90.80.80.70.72.42.11.71.51.61.92.01.91.91.81.71.51.41.31.21.21.21.21.11.11.00.90.90.90.80.80.70.70.60.63.12.72.11.81.71.71.81.81.61.61.51.41.31.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.70.70.60.60.50.50.53.12.72.52.21.91.81.81.71.51.41.31.31.11.00.90.91.01.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.60.60.50.50.40.40.43.73.03.02.72.22.01.81.71.61.41.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.90.91.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.40.40.30.34.23.03.33.02.42.01.81.71.61.51.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.70.80.80.80.80.70.60.50.40.40.40.30.30.30.23.93.03.13.22.82.11.81.61.51.41.31.21.11.00.90.80.70.70.60.60.70.70.60.60.50.40.40.30.30.20.20.23.12.93.02.72.31.81.61.41.31.21.11.00.90.80.70.60.60.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.30.30.20.20.20.20.12.62.42.72.62.11.81.51.41.31.21.11.00.80.70.60.60.50.50.40.40.40.40.20.20.20.10.11.61.91.82.12.11.71.51.31.21.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.30.10.10.11.01.41.51.41.61.71.41.21.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.10.10.11.31.31.21.21.31.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.70.60.50.40.10.10.11.91.61.31.11.01.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.60.60.50.40.10.10.10.12.72.21.61.31.11.01.01.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.13.62.82.21.81.51.21.11.01.11.01.00.90.80.60.50.40.33.22.82.72.21.71.41.21.11.01.01.00.90.70.60.50.43.72.93.02.62.01.61.31.11.01.01.00.90.80.70.60.44.22.83.63.12.41.81.41.21.01.00.90.90.80.70.60.53.62.93.03.22.92.21.71.31.11.00.90.80.80.70.60.50.43.02.73.02.72.31.91.51.31.10.90.80.70.70.60.50.52.32.32.42.62.21.91.71.41.21.10.90.80.60.60.50.41.41.81.92.02.22.01.71.51.41.21.00.80.70.60.50.40.10.11.01.41.61.61.82.01.91.71.51.31.11.00.80.60.50.40.30.10.10.11.41.61.51.51.71.81.81.61.41.21.00.90.70.60.50.30.20.20.10.11.91.81.61.71.81.81.71.61.41.21.00.80.60.50.40.60.50.30.22.62.22.02.01.91.71.61.51.31.10.90.70.60.40.31.00.70.53.22.62.72.31.91.61.51.41.31.10.90.70.50.41.71.20.90.73.82.83.02.41.91.61.41.31.21.00.80.70.50.42.21.81.41.14.32.93.12.62.01.61.41.31.11.00.80.60.52.21.91.81.51.24.72.93.43.02.21.61.31.21.00.90.80.60.53.42.42.01.81.62.93.22.72.11.61.31.11.00.90.70.60.50.43.23.12.92.62.11.62.93.02.61.91.51.21.00.90.80.70.60.50.42.32.73.02.51.91.42.92.72.51.91.51.21.00.90.80.80.60.50.41.91.92.42.42.01.51.12.72.22.01.81.51.21.11.00.90.80.70.50.41.81.81.82.01.91.51.10.72.31.91.61.51.41.21.11.11.00.90.70.60.51.21.41.51.61.61.41.10.71.81.71.41.31.21.21.21.11.00.90.80.60.50.70.91.01.11.31.21.61.61.41.21.21.21.21.11.00.90.80.60.50.30.50.60.80.91.81.71.41.31.31.21.11.11.00.80.70.60.40.20.20.30.40.52.32.01.71.61.51.31.11.00.80.70.60.50.40.20.20.20.30.32.82.32.22.01.61.31.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.20.23.52.72.82.21.71.31.00.90.70.60.50.40.30.30.20.20.10.10.14.02.93.02.41.81.41.10.90.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.14.52.83.22.72.01.41.11.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.12.93.42.92.11.51.11.00.80.60.50.40.30.20.20.14.52.93.02.62.01.51.10.90.80.60.50.40.30.20.22.82.92.51.81.41.10.90.70.60.50.40.32.82.42.21.81.31.10.90.70.60.50.42.51.91.61.51.21.00.90.70.60.51.81.51.11.11.00.90.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.84.82.31.81.61.22.72.41.91.51.10.72.62.52.21.91.51.02.12.01.81.71.61.81.81.61.31.51.51.61.71.41.71.61.51.42.01.81.61.41.22.62.11.71.51.22.32.01.71.32.01.81.61.21.30.52.83.32.91.81.92.02.12.22.52.42.22.12.42.83.33.74.04.14.21.61.81.92.12.22.32.32.32.32.22.02.12.12.12.42.93.53.73.83.94.04.25.25.74.51.31.51.81.92.02.32.42.62.72.72.72.62.32.11.82.22.22.32.63.14.14.75.65.24.13.63.42.92.11.41.11.21.31.51.61.81.92.12.22.42.52.72.93.13.43.43.22.82.42.32.12.62.52.62.93.55.24.23.83.82.81.71.01.31.41.41.41.51.71.82.02.12.22.32.42.42.62.72.83.23.64.14.13.42.72.62.82.62.93.13.03.24.04.54.84.54.43.92.41.21.11.21.41.51.71.81.81.92.02.12.22.42.52.52.52.52.52.72.82.92.82.93.33.83.73.22.93.34.84.63.53.62.93.04.05.05.510.16.55.44.73.81.01.21.31.41.51.71.81.92.02.02.12.22.32.52.83.03.22.92.52.52.82.93.03.23.12.83.23.94.84.13.47.32.73.03.54.45.66.36.811.67.66.24.83.41.61.51.61.81.92.02.12.22.22.22.22.32.32.42.63.03.53.42.82.42.63.03.23.33.53.32.83.33.43.64.24.96.07.38.513.49.06.64.73.11.31.61.71.92.12.32.52.62.62.42.32.42.52.62.52.42.42.63.03.23.02.62.63.23.54.14.34.85.56.68.19.616.010.16.84.83.01.21.51.71.92.02.22.42.83.23.22.72.42.42.72.72.82.82.62.42.93.53.95.05.15.56.27.08.18.815.69.36.34.72.71.01.31.41.61.81.92.12.22.22.22.73.23.02.62.32.52.93.13.13.12.96.46.36.67.17.67.117.811.58.46.04.32.31.31.51.71.92.12.32.52.61.92.02.53.13.63.12.52.48.56.96.76.86.86.66.411.68.77.05.13.71.81.21.51.82.02.22.52.83.02.62.12.02.79.16.86.76.46.36.67.18.56.85.84.52.91.31.11.51.92.12.22.43.14.14.27.65.95.85.65.55.67.35.24.94.22.31.11.41.82.22.52.22.13.37.15.35.04.94.74.96.24.14.53.71.91.41.82.22.62.82.32.23.54.64.74.34.24.04.44.74.43.53.93.11.61.41.82.22.73.23.32.62.83.73.73.43.53.72.83.03.12.51.31.41.72.12.53.03.43.23.53.33.23.33.03.03.42.32.42.32.01.82.12.42.72.82.83.13.83.03.12.82.83.02.92.52.11.91.81.51.72.32.52.62.62.63.13.12.82.82.82.52.21.81.61.51.21.52.02.32.52.72.82.92.73.23.03.02.62.21.91.71.51.31.31.82.22.42.62.93.13.33.33.43.33.22.52.11.81.51.41.21.11.62.02.42.52.73.13.33.73.53.33.32.72.11.71.51.31.11.41.82.32.72.72.63.03.53.13.43.02.21.71.41.21.01.21.72.22.73.12.82.52.73.03.42.92.11.61.31.11.11.51.92.53.03.42.93.02.82.72.01.51.01.31.72.12.63.23.33.43.62.01.21.51.82.22.42.62.83.71.11.41.61.82.02.12.12.61.31.41.61.82.02.22.12.11.01.21.51.71.92.12.32.51.21.41.51.61.82.02.42.71.21.51.61.71.81.92.54.41.11.51.71.81.82.02.13.27.61.11.41.82.02.02.02.22.32.91.41.82.12.42.22.02.22.51.31.72.22.62.92.52.12.11.31.72.12.63.13.42.82.72.41.41.72.02.42.83.33.33.33.51.72.02.32.62.82.82.93.81.62.02.32.52.62.62.63.01.42.22.52.62.83.02.82.61.21.72.12.42.62.93.13.33.41.51.92.32.62.63.03.33.71.31.72.22.62.82.62.93.41.11.52.02.63.13.02.62.72.91.01.41.82.32.93.43.13.03.01.21.62.02.43.03.23.23.81.11.41.82.12.32.42.63.41.61.92.12.32.12.52.91.11.41.62.02.32.83.03.21.11.41.72.12.63.66.01.01.21.51.82.22.74.01.01.31.61.92.32.83.61.11.41.72.02.32.72.21.01.41.82.02.22.02.01.01.41.92.22.22.02.11.41.92.32.52.42.81.41.92.53.13.03.31.41.92.53.23.23.31.82.42.92.82.81.31.82.32.62.42.32.31.31.82.22.32.32.42.51.31.72.12.22.42.72.91.31.72.12.22.52.73.01.41.82.02.22.42.73.01.41.82.02.22.52.73.01.31.72.02.22.42.62.81.21.72.12.22.32.42.41.21.62.12.52.52.32.62.12.63.02.73.21.62.12.83.43.23.81.52.12.73.33.13.31.52.02.52.92.72.81.52.02.42.62.42.41.52.02.32.42.52.72.91.51.92.32.42.73.03.31.62.02.22.42.73.03.41.51.92.22.42.73.03.41.41.92.22.42.62.83.11.31.82.22.42.42.52.52.22.62.62.42.71.21.62.22.73.02.73.31.01.52.12.83.43.13.91.52.02.63.22.93.31.41.92.42.72.52.81.31.72.12.22.22.61.21.61.92.02.23.68.01.11.51.71.82.23.47.51.11.41.51.71.92.32.93.53.42.82.12.11.61.92.22.73.22.12.32.12.22.73.13.02.42.02.01.31.51.71.82.02.32.51.92.02.02.02.53.13.22.72.11.81.71.61.71.81.82.02.12.11.71.81.82.12.63.02.92.62.21.91.62.12.02.02.02.01.91.81.51.61.82.02.22.32.32.11.91.71.52.52.32.12.12.01.81.61.41.51.61.71.71.71.71.61.51.41.22.32.22.22.32.11.81.51.31.21.21.31.31.21.21.11.11.00.92.42.32.52.52.11.71.41.13.22.93.12.82.21.71.23.23.33.32.92.21.61.12.82.72.62.11.51.02.12.21.91.81.61.51.41.21.11.01.11.42.01.61.92.32.51.41.61.82.01.91.71.61.71.51.20.70.726.91.31.72.11.71.51.61.82.02.12.12.22.22.12.53.33.42.52.01.81.71.21.41.61.82.63.42.42.12.22.22.32.42.52.83.13.33.65.35.93.73.02.82.31.31.82.42.73.35.03.23.12.92.52.42.42.63.13.84.85.16.78.25.14.83.82.72.01.61.31.11.42.02.93.94.27.04.14.13.22.62.42.52.73.24.25.97.18.611.07.06.24.22.92.11.71.31.11.52.13.24.55.59.15.34.63.52.92.62.72.93.44.56.58.611.414.28.87.04.63.12.31.81.21.62.33.75.34.810.35.55.13.82.92.72.83.03.54.97.210.312.615.610.47.45.03.21.21.62.23.34.75.89.65.64.83.63.02.72.83.03.54.76.68.711.614.48.97.04.63.22.31.81.21.52.13.14.14.57.64.54.43.42.92.72.72.93.54.46.17.48.911.37.26.34.33.02.21.81.21.62.12.83.33.75.73.73.73.43.02.92.93.13.54.35.35.57.18.65.45.14.02.92.31.81.41.62.02.22.53.34.53.23.03.03.13.13.23.43.63.94.04.46.06.74.33.63.32.82.32.01.51.71.81.92.33.13.73.12.72.83.13.33.43.43.43.33.23.74.74.83.62.82.62.52.32.01.51.71.81.92.43.13.83.12.82.83.03.23.23.33.23.13.03.34.14.23.22.62.32.22.11.91.41.72.02.32.63.44.73.33.13.02.92.92.92.82.93.03.23.34.24.73.12.72.42.11.81.61.21.62.12.93.53.96.03.83.93.32.82.52.42.42.63.03.73.84.55.53.63.42.62.01.61.41.21.62.13.14.34.88.04.74.43.42.72.42.32.32.53.03.94.75.67.04.63.92.72.01.51.31.21.62.33.54.96.09.95.74.83.62.82.42.32.42.63.24.35.57.28.75.54.33.02.11.61.31.31.62.33.65.35.510.35.45.03.72.82.42.42.52.73.44.66.17.59.25.54.63.22.21.71.41.21.62.23.34.55.38.85.14.53.42.72.52.52.62.93.44.45.46.88.25.44.43.22.31.81.51.21.62.13.03.94.26.84.04.13.22.72.52.62.83.13.64.55.06.07.14.84.43.32.52.01.61.41.72.12.62.93.55.13.33.23.02.82.83.03.23.54.04.44.66.16.94.64.03.52.82.31.81.51.71.92.12.43.24.03.02.62.62.83.03.43.74.04.34.44.86.97.34.84.03.63.12.62.11.61.71.81.92.33.13.62.92.52.42.73.13.54.14.54.64.85.38.18.75.44.43.93.53.02.21.51.71.92.12.43.24.13.02.62.62.72.93.54.14.85.15.46.29.510.86.25.14.44.03.12.21.31.62.12.72.93.55.23.43.22.92.62.73.24.05.05.55.76.49.410.96.55.45.04.33.32.21.21.62.13.03.94.37.04.14.03.12.52.53.04.05.26.36.66.99.610.67.06.36.04.83.42.11.21.62.23.34.55.59.05.14.43.22.62.52.94.05.46.98.49.113.814.49.88.26.85.03.42.01.31.62.33.75.34.810.25.44.93.52.62.53.04.05.57.49.711.714.516.211.810.07.45.23.42.01.31.62.33.44.85.99.75.64.73.42.62.53.04.05.57.29.510.716.411.79.57.35.13.52.23.14.34.77.84.64.33.22.62.53.04.15.36.67.58.111.912.88.57.36.54.93.43.03.43.85.83.73.63.12.62.63.14.05.15.96.16.48.99.96.45.85.54.63.32.72.72.72.83.34.04.85.25.46.19.511.26.45.24.74.23.22.32.62.93.34.54.64.85.48.49.55.64.74.13.72.94.66.77.14.74.03.62.63.63.31.01.01.0 1.0 1.016.50.30.20.20.30.20.10.30.20.10.30.20.10.50.30.20.10.50.30.20.10.50.30.20.50.30.20.40.30.20.40.30.20.40.30.20.30.30.20.40.30.20.20.30.20.20.30.20.20.20.20.10.30.20.20.20.20.10.20.20.10.20.10.30.20.10.20.20.10.20.20.20.20.30.20.20.30.20.30.20.30.20.40.30.40.30.40.30.50.40.50.40.50.40.5 0.50.50.50.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.20.20.10.20.20.10.20.20.10.10.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.50.30.20.10.10.10.50.30.20.10.10.10.40.20.10.10.10.40.20.10.10.10.40.20.10.10.10.40.20.10.10.40.20.10.10.40.30.20.10.40.30.20.10.40.30.20.10.10.30.30.20.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.10.10.10.10.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.40.20.20.10.10.10.30.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.10.50.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.50.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.40.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.40.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.40.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.6 0.60.60.30.3 0.40.30.40.30.40.30.40.30.40.30.40.30.50.30.50.30.50.40.30.50.40.30.60.40.30.60.40.30.50.30.50.30.60.40.30.60.40.30.50.40.30.50.30.40.30.40.30.40.30.4 0.40.60.40.50.30.40.30.40.30.30.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.20.20.7 0.70.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.20.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.10.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.3BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'CC @ 10'AA1 @ 27'AA @ 27'AA @ 27'AA1 @ 27'AA2 @ 27'AA2 @ 27'BB @ 32'BB @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB1 @ 32'BB2 @ 32'BB3 @ 32'AA3 @ 27'AA3 @ 27'AA3 @ 27'AA3 @ 27'AA4 @ 27'AA5 @ 27'Plan ViewScale - 1" = 50ftStatisticsDescription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MinDrive Lane1.7 fc 2.8 fc 0.5 fc 5.6:1 3.4:1Light Trespass0.4 fc 0.7 fc 0.2 fc 3.5:1 2.0:1Light Trespass0.1 fc 0.3 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/ALight Trespass0.1 fc 0.6 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/ALoading DockArea1.3 fc 4.8 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/AParking Lot2.7 fc 26.9 fc 0.7 fc 38.4:1 3.9:1Parking Lot4.1 fc 16.5 fc 1.0 fc 16.5:1 4.1:1ScheduleSymbolLabel Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number DescriptionLampNumberLampsLumens Per Lamp Light Loss Factor WattageAA1 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA8C-740-U-T4WGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (8) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV WIDEOPTICS1284401445AA1 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA8C-740-U-SL3GALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (8) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE III SPILLLIGHT ELIMINATOR OPTICS1284431445AA12 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA3C-740-U-T4WGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (3) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV WIDEOPTICS48 4471166AA22 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA3C-740-U-SL3GALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (3) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE III SPILLLIGHT ELIMINATOR OPTICS48 4501166AA34 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA3D-740-U-T4FTGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (3) 70CRI, 4000K, 1200mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV FORWARDTHROW OPTICS48 4971382AA41 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA6C-740-U-T4FTGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (6) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV FORWARDTHROW OPTICS96 4441666AA51 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA8C-740-U-T4WGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (8) 70CRI, 4000K, 1050mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV WIDEOPTICS1284401890BB10 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA4D-740-U-T4WGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (4) 70CRI, 4000K, 1200mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV WIDEOPTICS64 4861258BB17 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA4D-740-U-T4FTGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (4) 70CRI, 4000K, 1200mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV FORWARDTHROW OPTICS64 4921258BB21 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA5D-740-U-SL3GALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (5) 70CRI, 4000K, 1200mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE III SPILLLIGHT ELIMINATOR OPTICS80 4851320BB31 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS -McGRAW-EDISON(FORMERLY EATON)GLEON-SA5D-740-U-T4WGALLEON AREA ANDROADWAY LUMINAIRE (5) 70CRI, 4000K, 1200mALIGHTSQUARES WITH 16 LEDSEACH AND TYPE IV WIDEOPTICS80 4821320CC10 COOPER LIGHTINGSOLUTIONS - HALO(FORMERLY EATON)SMD6R12940WHE HALO 6" ROUND SURFACEMOUNT 1200LM UNV Voltage4000K LED4926115.3November 2021 Site Plan Review - Lighting Plan Final Plat approved in 2020 G A T E W A Y B L V D . I N T E R S T A T E H IG HW A Y 3 5W INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35W 109 9 11 11 11 11 710 10 9 15 15 14 13 12 12 5 14 11 11 11 8 9 7 23 14 22 9 3 3 1212 18.0'24.0'18.0' 24.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'18.0'24.0'18.0' 24.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'H A H H H HA A A F F G F F G F F G9.0'9.0'9. 0 ' 9.0' A C C O C C C C I I I I I6.7'I I K EXIST. 10' UTILITY EASEMENT, EX OVHD POWER TO BE RELOCATED, COORD W/UTILITY 24.0' BUILDING 250,000 S.F. FFE: 898.50 DOCK YARD: 894.50 EXISTING WET POND TO BE MODIFIED WETLAND TO REMAIN; PROTECT FROM DISTURBANCE WETLAND TO REMAIN; PROTECT FROM DISTURBANCE WETLAND TO REMAIN ,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WET POND SEE SHEET C501 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 70.0'E E E N M M L L D D E E E N M M L L D E E EN M M LL B 3.8' 6.7' 10.5'3.8'6.7'10.5'3.8'6.7'10.5'6.7' 2 0 . 0 ' A J 60.0'37.8'2 0 . 0 ' 74.8' WETLAND TO REMAIN; PROTECT FROM DISTURBANCE UTILITY EXCAVATION PATCH, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY OF ARDEN HILLS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS UTILITY EXCAVATION PATCH, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY OF ARDEN HILLS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 52. 4 '31.0'O I O 60.0'3.8'3.8' 127.9'263.7'L B L B L L LB B L B EXIST. SIGHT LINE EASEMENT EXIST. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT EXIST. SIGHT LINE EASEMENT94.4'205.0'Q Q Q S 'NO PARKING' Q S 'NO PARKING' Q S 'NO PARKING' R T S 'NO PARKING' Q PROPOSED RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE/RAILING; SEE SHEET C500 GRADING PLAN EXIST. 25' ACCESS EASEMENT EXIST. 130' UTILITY EASEMENT EXIST. UTILITY EASEMENT EXIST. PONDING EASEMENT TO BE MODIFIED 76.1'105.0' 160.8' 3 5 . 6 '30.0'114.5'PROPOSED RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE/RAILING; SEE SHEET C500 GRADING PLAN Q G R C C B LOT #1 21.94 AC R 1 42 7 .7' R1427.7' FUTURE LOT 2 ACCESS ROAD (BY OTHERS) DRIVE UP RAMP DRIVE UP RAMP 240.0'275.0'3 1 1 . 0 ' 275.3'240.0'70.0'60.0'70.0' PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WET POND SEE SHEET C501 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN LOT #2 3.87 AC EXTEND VALLEY GUTTER AT DRIVE ENTRANCE, MAINTAIN GUTTER FLOW THROUGH DRIVE TO DIVERT GATEWAY BLVD DRAINAGE FROM ENTRANCE 24.0' F F G E E E N M M L L D 30.0'30.0'R1397.7'R20.0 'R20.0'R45.0'R20.0'R10.0' R10.0'R26.0'R50.0'R 10 0 .0 'R75.0'R10.0' R1 5 .0'EXTEND VALLEY GUTTER AT DRIVE ENTRANCE, MAINTAIN GUTTER FLOW THROUGH DRIVE TO DIVERT GATEWAY BLVD DRAINAGE FROM ENTRANCE30.0'30.0'R25.0'R20.0'R20 .0 'R 25.0' R20.0' R20.0'12.0'12.0' CITY MONUMENT SIGN, APPROXIMATE LOCATION 10' WIDE R.O.W. DEDICATION, APPROX 0.41 ACRES 20.0'PROVIDE PERMANENT TYPE 3 BARRICADE WHERE EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKS WERE REMOVED, EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE TO REMAIN FOR SERVICE TO MCES SEWER METER BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC) BUILDING AREA 250,000 SF (22.9% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 SF PROPOSED PARKING 363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 RATIO ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 8 STALLS / 8 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY GATEWAY INTERSTATE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1,142,156 SF (26.22 AC) LOT #1 21.94 AC LOT #2 3.87 AC R.O.W. DEDICATION 0.41 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 11.66 AC PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 14.56 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 17.60 AC ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING GATEWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING GATEWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 20' ROAD = 50' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 20' REAR = 20' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\Arden Hills, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg August 21, 2020 - 1:30pmIssues and Revisions: Commission No: Drawn by: Checked by: SHEETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBRJ BRJ/LEC 71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114WATERSHED PERMIT UPDATE 08/21/2020 BENJAMIN R. JOHNSON, PE 53084DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 5/1/2020 GATEWAY INTERSTATE ARDEN HILLS, MN 2 CITY SUBMITTAL 7/20/2020 3 WATERSHED UPDATE 7/24/2020 4 WATERSHED UPDATE 8/21/2020 SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, DATED 03/18/2020. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 26.220 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 16. THERE ARE 1.485 ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. NORTH KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT TIP-OUT GUTTER TRANSITION CURB FLAT CURB COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRON TRANSFORMER PAD EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE; LOCATION APPROXIMATE - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD REINSTALLED STREET LIGHT POLE ; COORD. W/ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS EXISTING SIGN; LOCATION APPROXIMATE - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD REINSTALLED EXISTING SIGN A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T SITE PLAN October 12, 2020 PUD Approved Site Plan G A T E W A Y B L V D . I N T E R S T A T E H IG HW A Y 3 5W INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35W 109 9 11 11 11 11 710 10 9 15 15 14 13 12 12 5 14 11 11 11 8 9 7 23 14 22 9 3 3 1212 POTENTIAL/FUTURE PARKING LAYOUT PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 SF PROPOSED PARKING 363 SPACES @ 4/1,000 RATIO ADDITIONAL POTENTIAL FUTURE PARKING STALLS ±230 SPACES TOTAL POTENTIAL FUTURE PARKING STALLS ±593 SPACES PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND SNOW STORAGE AREA K:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\arden hills, mn\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C4-SITE ACCESS SNOW STORAGE PARKING EXHIBIT.dwg August 21, 2020 - 1:46pmIssues and Revisions: Commission No: Drawn by: Checked by: SHEETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBRJ BRJ/LEC 71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114WATERSHED PERMIT UPDATE 08/21/2020 BENJAMIN R. JOHNSON, PE 53084DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 5/1/2020 GATEWAY INTERSTATE ARDEN HILLS, MN 2 CITY SUBMITTAL 7/20/2020 3 WATERSHED UPDATE 7/24/2020 4 WATERSHED UPDATE 8/21/2020 NORTH SITE EXHIBIT - SNOW STORAGE, TRUCK ACCESS, FUTURE PARKING October 12, 2020 PUD Approved Site Exhibit GATEWAY BLVD.INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35WINTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35WINTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35WLOT #23.87 ACLOT #121.94 ACPROPOSED BUILDING± 250,000 S.F.OVERHEADUTILITY LINESLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT - SOUTHEASTLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT- NORTHEASTLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT - SOUTHWESTUNABLE TO PLANT TREES IN THIS LOCATION DUE TO FUTUREDRIVEWAY CONNECTION AND EXISTING UTILITIESEXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT/UNABLE TO PLANT TREES IN THIS LOCATION38'-6"44'-11"47'-7"46'-1"48'-1"32'-5"39'-2"43'-8"40'-7"47'-0"47'-5"48'-0"47'-6"1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - RDL1 - RVB+1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ABM1 - QUA1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - ULC1 - TCH1 - TCH1 - SWO*2 - TCH2 - SWO*2 - PFC2 - RDL3 - PFC7 - BHS2 - NWM*6 - KTC3 - QUC+5 - WHP2 - RDO*3 - SCP*2 - FFM*3 - RVB+5 - BHS3 - NWM*3 - QUC+3 - RVB+2 - FFM*3 - SCP*2 - RDO*5 - WHP1 - NWM*2 - BHS2 - QUC+1L1031L1011L102DD35-241DDDD35-24135-24135-24135-24125-131D35-24135-24125-13125-131DDDDDC33-26135-24135-24135-241D33-26225-13133-26133-26133-26133-26248'-2"3 - AUP5 - BHS3 - AUP3 - RVB+2 - CBS3 - BHS2 - ABM3 - WHP2 - SCP*3 - QUC+3 - ERC+2 - SWO*CONIFEROUS TREECODECOMMON NAMEAUPAUSTRIAN PINEBHSBLACK HILLS SPRUCECBSCOLORADO SPRUCEERC+EASTERN RED CEDARSCP*SCOTCH PINEWHPWHITE PINEORNAMENTAL TREECODECOMMON NAMEPFCPRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLEQUAQUAKING ASPENQUC+QUAKING ASPEN CLUMPRVB+RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKTCHTHORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORNOVERSTORY TREECODECOMMON NAMEABMAUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEFFM*SUGAR MAPLEKTCKENTUCKY TRUE COFFEETREENWM*NORTHWOOD MAPLERDLREDMOND AMERICAN LINDENRDO*RED OAKSWO*SWAMP WHITE OAKPLANT KEYNOTE: SEE SHEET L104 FOR LANDSCAPE SCHEDULESEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)22-11225-13133-26133-26233-36134-17135-22135-24136-21122-112ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)ABCDEFLANDSCAPE LEGENDEDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)PERENNIALSCODEQTYCOMMON NAMEAJS132AUTUMN JOY SEDUMBGT35GRAPE TAFFY BAPTISIABJB36BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGECNM6CINNAMON FERNKFG12KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSK:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\Arden Hills, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG October 05, 2020 - 11:59am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114WATERSHEDPERMITUPDATE08/21/2020DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALRYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA53828LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.RAHRAH/ JH1 CITY SUBMITTAL 5/1/2020GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN2 CITY SUBMITTAL 7/20/20203 WATERSHED UPDATE 7/24/20204 WATERSHED UPDATE 8/21/20205 LANDSCAPE UPDATE 10/02/2020MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA REQUIRED: 339,674 SF970,496 SF LOT AREA *0.35MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA PROVIDED: 652,668 SFTREE RATIO (BUILDING STORIES: 2)SIZE:6-7' HT 8-10' HT 11-14' HT(2.5-3") (3.5-4") (4.5-6")REQUIRED: 50% 30% 20%PROPOSED: 50% 30% 20%LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSSTREET TREES REQUIRED - GATEWAY BLVD: 30 TREES1484 LF / 50 =STREET TREES PROVIDED - GATEWAY BLVD: 71 TREESPERENNIALS/SHRUBS REQUIRED: 65,266 SF652,668 SF LANDSCAPE AREA * 0.1 =PERENNIAL/SHRUBS PROVIDED: 2,888 SFREQUIRED PLANTING ISLANDS: 11,177 SF111,769 SF PARKING AREA *0.1PROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 6,178 SF(MINIMUM 150 SF)REQUIRED PLANTING ISLAND TREES: 33 TREES33 PLANTING ISLANDS x 1 TREEPROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 34 TREESDIVERSE SELECTION REQUIRED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY,ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTDIVERSE SELECTION PROVIDED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY,ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY, AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTSCREENING REQUIRED - LOAD SERVICE: MAY INCLUDE A COMBINATIONOF THE FOLLOWING - BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTHCONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED.NATURAL MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND ATMATURITY.SCREENING PROVIDED- LOAD SERVICE: A COMBINATION OF BERMS,SHRUBS TREES AT A HEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHTAND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED. PLANT MATERIALS TO ACHIEVE60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED: 1,561 IN.499,552 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE / 320*MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED: 410 IN.*A SINGLE STORY BUILDING IN EXCESS OF THIRTY (30) FEET IN HEIGHTSHALL BE CONSIDERED A TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSESOF DETERMINING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE.LANDSCAPE PLANNORTH55555October 12, 2020 PUD Approved Landscape Plan CONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEAUP6PINUS NIGRAAUSTRIAN PINEB & B6` HT.BHS22PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCEB & B6` HT.CBS2PICEA PUNGENSCOLORADO SPRUCEB & B6` HT.ERC+3JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANAEASTERN RED CEDARB & B8` HT MINSCP*8PINUS SYLVESTRISSCOTCH PINEB & B12` HT.WHP13PINUS STROBUSWHITE PINEB & B6` HT.ORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEPFC5MALUS X `PRAIRIFIRE`PRAIRIFIRE CRAB APPLEB & B2.5" CAL.QUA5POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPENB & B2.5" CAL.QUC+11POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN CLUMPB & B8` HT.RVB+17BETULA NIGRARIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKB & B8` HT.TCH7CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS TMTHORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORNB & B2.5" CAL.OVERSTORY TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEABM7ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEB & B2.5" CAL.FFM*4ACER SACCHARUM `FALL FIESTA`SUGAR MAPLEB & B4.5" CAL.KTC6GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `UMNSYNERGY`KENTUCKY TRUE COFFEETREEB & B2.5" CAL.NWM*6ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLEB & B4.5" CAL.RDL6TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND`REDMOND AMERICAN LINDENB & B2.5" CAL.RDO*4QUERCUS RUBRARED OAKB & B4.5" CAL.SWO*5QUERCUS BICOLORSWAMP WHITE OAKB & B4.5" CAL.ULC4ULMUS AMERICANA `LEWIS & CLARK`PRAIRIE EXPEDITION ELMB & B2.5" CAL.CONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBFJ25JUNIPERUS SABINA `BUFFALO`BUFFALO JUNIPER#5 CONT.5` O.C.GOJ31JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER#5 CONT.4` O.C.NYW15TAXUS CUSPIDATA `NOVA`NOVA YEW#5 CONT.3` O.C.SGJ51JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER#5 CONT.5` O.C.DECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBLC8ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TMIROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY#5 CONT.4` O.C.CSC69CORNUS SERICEA `CARDINAL`CARDINAL DOGWOOD#5 CONT.4` O.C.DBH53DIERVILLA LONICERADWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#5 CONT.3` O.C.GGD8CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW`GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD#5 CONT.5` O.C.GLS8RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC#5 CONT.4` O.C.NIN14PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUSNINEBARK#5 CONT.5` O.C.RGD8CORNUS ALBA SIBIRICA `RED GNOME`RED GNOME DOGWOOD#5 CONT.4` O.C.SOS25AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA `OBELISK`STANDING OVATION SERVICEBERRY#5 CONT.4` HT.SPN14SALIX PURPUREA `NANA`DWARF ARCTIC WILLOW#5 CONT.4` O.C.PERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZESPACINGAJS132SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY`AUTUMN JOY SEDUM#1 CONT18" OC18" o.c.BGT35BAPTISIA X `GRAPE TAFFY`GRAPE TAFFY BAPTISIA#1 CONT.24" O.C.24" o.c.BJB36PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA `BLUE JEAN BABY`BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGE#1 CONT.36" OC36" o.c.CNM6OSMUNDA CINNAMOMEACINNAMON FERN#1 CONT.36" O.C.36" o.c.KFG12CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1 CONT30" OC30" o.c.KSM35ECHINACEA X `TNECHKY`KISMET YELLOW CONEFLOWER#1 CONT.24" O.C.24" o.c.MSY30ACHILLEA X `MOONSHINE`MOONSHINE YARROW#1 CONT.24" O.C.24" o.c.NWS52PANICUM VIRGATUM `NORTHWIND`NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS#1 CONT.24" O.C.24" o.c.OCT19ANDROPOGON GERARDII `RED OCTOBER`RED OCTOBER BIG BLUESTEM5 GAL24" O.C.24" o.c.PCA19ASTILBE CHINENSIS `PURPURKERZE`PURPLE CANDLES ASTILBE#1 CONT.36" O.C.36" o.c.PDS37SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPISPRAIRIE DROPSEED#1 CONT24" OC24" o.c.PSG115PANICUM VIRGATUM `SHENANDOAH`SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS#1 CONT.24" O.C.24" o.c.PLANT SCHEDULEK:\TWC_LDEV\Scannell\Arden Hills, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG October 05, 2020 - 11:56am Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 71155-200422020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114WATERSHEDPERMITUPDATE08/21/2020DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALRYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA53828LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.RAHRAH/ JH1 CITY SUBMITTAL 5/1/2020GATEWAY INTERSTATEARDEN HILLS, MN2 CITY SUBMITTAL 7/20/20203 WATERSHED UPDATE 7/24/20204 WATERSHED UPDATE 8/21/20205 LANDSCAPE UPDATE 10/02/2020LANDSCAPE DETAILS,NOTES, & SCHEDULEDOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHNOTES:2X ROOT BALL WIDTHSOD4" TOPSOILPREPARED PLANTING BED ANDBACKFILL SOIL(THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES:1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT.3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECTAND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEMGIRDLING ROOTS.4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILLVOIDS.6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESSSOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST.1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ORTHOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL.INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UPTO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAPAND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6"INTERVALS.5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THETOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT.REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOPTWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROMTHE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE.REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS.6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TOSETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME.9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER.PLANTING SOILON CENTER SPACINGAS STATED ON PLAN.EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTHA MINIMUM OF 6" BEYONDTHE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.FINISHED GRADEEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDTREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1041SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.31/2"FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER.LAWN SIDE"BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BYVALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO.USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USEKNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDEANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHORSTAKES AT 48" O.C., AND ATCHANGES.EACH END.PLASTIC DIVIDER:FINISHED GRADE ATSHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOPOF DIVIDER.PLANTING BED1"POLY EDGER DETAILSCALE: N.T.S.L1044SPADED EDGE DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1046MULCH AT PLANTING AREASPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH,4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWNSIDELAWN GRASSFINISHED GRADEBUILDING, EXTERIOR WALLPROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGEAWAY FROM BUILDINGSPECIFIED ROCK MULCH1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIPEDGER, AS SPECIFIEDSOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUMOF 4" BELOW EDGING TOPTO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATELIP FOR MULCH.SPECIFIED SOIL MIXFINISH GRADE FOR LAWNMAINTENANCE STRIP DETAILSCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L10454" 1"NOTE:1. EXTENDED EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SOIL TO A POINT DOWNSLOPEEQUAL TO OR LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLEDIRECTLY BENEATH THE PLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE INHEAVY SOILS. GRANULAR SOIL MUST BE ADDED AS BACKFILL IN AREASOF POOR DRAINAGE.STEEP SLOPE PLANTINGSCALE: N.T.S.L1042EXISTING GRADECUT AREAPLANT ACCORDING TOPLANTING DETAILSAPPLICABLE AS SHOWNBACKFILL AREA1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TOVERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTSOR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOSUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THEGUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONEYEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADESHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTHRATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-INMATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THETOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVEDDOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THEROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAKAPART PEAT POTS.12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POORBRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONEYEAR.15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIORTO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THENEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECTTOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGERTHAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE,SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUBPLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS.PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED DARKWALNUT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, ATMINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADEFILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS(WHERE APPLICABLE).18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGINGOR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES ANDSTAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEADAT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKSFOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TOCREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BESTANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALLTOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 ORGREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOTINDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMALPROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRSTYEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR.ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR.21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANTIS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDEWATER FOR CONTRACTOR.22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARDAREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.LANDSCAPE NOTES5555555555NOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANT QUANTITIES PER PLAN AND FIELD CONDITIONS.October 12, 2020 PUD Approved Landscape Plan kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 (651) 645-4197 MEMORANDUM To: The City of Arden Hills, Minnesota From: Blake Sweeney, Katie Leise Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/12/2021 Subject: Gateway Interstate Tree Caliper Inch Calculations I am writing to inform you of the methods of which the caliper inches for the Gateway Interstate project were calculated. Using 1325.05 Subdivision 1. F2 - F3 (shown below), we used the Tree Ratio table and the Coniferous Tree Measurement to determine the caliper inch that corresponds to the height of a tree. For a 6’ HT tree we determined it to be equivalent to 2.5 caliper inches. For a 8’ HT tree we determined it to be equivalent to 3.5 caliper inches. For a 12’ HT tree we determined it to be equivalent to 5 caliper inches. Using these conversions and the additional trees identified by caliper inch in the plant schedule on sheet L105, we calculated a total of 423.5 caliper inches provided (as noted on sheet L100). 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 HRGREEN.COM November 5, 2021 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Preliminary Gateway Interstate Plan Parking Lot Addition Plan Revision Review Comments Dear David, A preliminary engineering plan review is underway on the identified revised plan sheets for the Gateway Interstate (plan revision date – October 14, 2021). The plans have been reviewed. The report still needs to be reviewed to confirm capacities, elevations, etc. A summary of the preliminary review comments are as follows: General Plan Review Comments 1. A maintenance, operations, inspection and repair plan and agreement for the underground stormwater system needs to be developed and submitted for review. 2. Stormwater Management Report – Provide additional design information to review and confirm phosphorus removed percentage 3. Several utilities are within grading and retaining wall areas, especially along MnDOT ROW. Identify ownership and maintenance access areas. 4. Address the 25-foot access easement for billboards along the southern property line. 5. Provide verification of Rice Creek Watershed District review and approval. 6. Provide verification from Metropolitan Council approving access needs to meter pit. 7. Provide verification from MnDOT review and approval. 8. Apply for a City Grading and Erosion Control Permit, separate from the existing permit of the larger development project. No grading for the parking lot can begin until permit has been approved. C200 – EXISTING CONDITION AND REMOVALS PLAN 9. Sheet C200 was not clouded as containing any changes, but does include a revision 2 note, dated 10/14/21. Several items are listed as protect, remove, cap, etc. (wells, sanitary, etc.) and are not identified. Identify what these are and their ownership, to confirm any additional approvals, requirements, etc. for work on, and around, them. As an existing conditions sheet, all structures should be identified. C300 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE I David Swearingen November 3, 2021 2 10. Existing Round Lake Road seems to remain intact. Detail silt fence in this area. 11. A large structure is not identified along the MnDOT ROW in the SW corner of the existing road at the SW corner of the existing pond/wetland. It appears pipes are going east and west out of the structure. Identify what this structure is and its ownership. 12. Disturbance limits need to be added along wetland D, along the silt fencing. 13. Confirm no grading is taking place within wetland D in the NE corner. It is unclear. C300 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE 2 14. Apparent drainage structure on the NW corner of the lot and between lighting islands are not identified. 15. If road at the NW corner of the lot is used during construction a construction access must be installed. 16. Add Note A along the north edge of Wetland D. 17. Existing structures within grading areas do not have elevation information. Elevation details need to be added for grading. 18. Not all utilities on other sheets appear to be shown. Show all utility structures in grading areas to confirm elevations. C400 – OVERALL SITE PLAN 19. Existing ponding easement is called to be vacated. What will replace it since public storm water will still utilize the underground storm structure? 20. Sanitary sewer easement leaders do not point to an easement line. Show all easements and identify type, etc. 21. Manhole callouts and manhole locations are missing in the retaining wall area at the SW corner of the lot. C401 – ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22. Show radii or angle points in lot curbing. 23. Need lighting and electrical information and details for parking lot lights. C500 – GRADING PLAN 24. Show high point near NW corner exit. 25. How are utilities in SW grading and retaining wall areas going to be accessed after construction? C501 – GRADING PLAN ENLARGED 26. Detail pipe crossing to ensure no conflicts. 27. How are utilities in SW grading and retaining wall areas going to be accessed after construction? 28. Does new 36” RCP connect to existing pipes? IF so, details needed. If not, detail pipe end point. David Swearingen November 3, 2021 3 C510 – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 29. For parking light locations, show location of underground storm system. Provide lighting details to ensure no conflicts with lighting pole bases and underground detention pipes 30. Identify EOF in plans and detail. 31. Wetland D EOF is listed as 882.5. The emergency spillway 890.75. confirm elevations. 32. Draining to MnDOT ROW. Has MnDOT reviewed/approved? Confirm. C600 – UTILITY PLAN 33. Several note leaders are not point to what note describes. Correct. 34. Need electrical plans and details for any conflicts with the electrical system and the underground storage system. Particularly the pole foundations. 35. Pipe crossing note leader is not pointing to a conflict. Correct. 36. The easement along the MnDOT ROW is called out as a 30’ easement. With the 15’ dimension shown, the easement does not appear to be 30’. Confirm. 37. Detail all utility crossings of the retaining wall for conflicts. 38. How are easements and facilities accessed for maintenance after construction? C601 – WATERMAIN PROFILE 39. Detail 8” existing watermain connection. 40. Add notes for watermain bend locations. 41. Detail sanitary pipe crossing for conflict. 42. Show all wall and foundation details to confirm any conflicts. 43. What is 2.79’ depth indicating? Clarify. C601 – WATERMAIN PROFILE 44. Show all wall and foundation details to confirm any conflicts. 45. No watermain bends are shown on plan view before 24” PVC storm crossing. Confirm locations. 46. Add separation distance at 6+10 proposed storm crossing C703 – CIVIL DETAILS 47. Provide site specific Contech system design and details 48. Confirm assumed soil bearing is met on site 49. Confirm manhole cap design load is adequate for anticipated vehicle use. David Swearingen November 3, 2021 4 L101 – LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 50. Parking lot area is not clouded. Have changes been made? Confirm for further review. EX-1 – SITE EXHIBIT 51. Parking lot area is not clouded. Have changes been made? Confirm for further review. Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Gateway Interstate Revised plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director tA_ ryrLLs CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RBSOLUTION NO. 2020.045 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SUBJBCT PROPBRTY AT 42OO ROUND LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, City Staff received a land use application for 4200 Round Lake Road Subject Property") for a Conditional Use Permit request on May 7,2020; WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the GB, Gateway Business District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the Land Use Plan; WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a Conditional Use Permit in order to operate a warehouse use; WHEREAS, the City's obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on September gth,2O2O. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the recommendation of the City Staff that this request be approved and, as such voted 7-0 in favor of the request; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2020-045 approving Planning Case 20-010 for a Conditional Use Permit request at the Subject Property 4200 Round Lake Road to operate a warehouse use based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 27'h, 2020 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: l. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted and as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the City Council. 2. The Preliminary Plat approval shall expire six months from the date of the City Council approval unless the Final Plat has recorded with Ramsey County or a time extension granted by the City Council. 3. The Applicant shall record the Final Plat with Ramsey County and a copy shall be provided to the City within sixty (90) days of the City's approval. I 4. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be those in effect at the time of Final Plat approval and shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 5. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a building permit. 6. The Applicant shall submit a park dedication fee that shall be seven and a half (7.5) percent of the fair market value of the unimproved land and subject to the approval of the City Council. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the release of the Final Plat. 7 . Survey monuments shall be placed and installed at all block corners, angle points, points of curves in streets, and at intermediate points as shown on the Final Plat. Pipes or steel rods shall be placed at the corners of each Iot. 8. The final plat shall provide dedication of a 60-ft wide right of way for Gateway Boulevard on Lot 2, Block 1 overlying the area currently encumbered by existing drainage and utility easement. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, planning staff shall approve in writing the final landscaping plan. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final location of the loading driveway access to align with adjacent commercial driveway or provide adequate offset distance. 1 1. A cross easement access and maintenance agreement for the proposed share access on Lot 2 shall be submitted and memorialized in the Development Agreement. 12. Site Plan approval shall be required for the construction of the proof of parking area. 13. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 14. A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 15. A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 16. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 17. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 6. 18. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security of $50,000.00 dollars shall be submitted. Landscape financial security is held for two full growing seasons. 19. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 20. All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance 2 of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 21 . Prior to City Council consideration, the Applicant shall submit a materials board to be approved in writing by staff. 22. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City's Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 23. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 24.Prror to the issuance of the Grading and Erosion permit, the Engineering Department shall review and approve final grading and utility plans in writing. Plans shall be amended to include detail drawings for connection to the sanitary sewer system in Gateway Boulevard, restoration of utility cuts within public streets, and inclusion of City details 3401 ,3402,3408, and 4000. 25. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 26.The Applicant shall provide an executed copy of the City's standard stormwater maintenance and easement agreement prior to approval of the Development Agreement. 27. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. 28. AII areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 29. Overnight trailer parking is prohibited onsite other than along the dock wall within the concrete dock apron. 30. The Applicant shall work with Ramsey County to add five (5) seconds to the signal timing for Round Lake Road and Hwy 96 to allow for more northbound Ieft turns during the PM peak hour prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 31. Warehousing and wholesaling shall not exceed 80 percent of the total floor area. The remaining 20 percent of the total floor area shall be non-warehouse uses such as a combination of uses including-but-not-limited-to office, manufacturing, production, research and development, lab and/or showroom. 32. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall dedicate $10,000 in lieu of meeting minimum caliper inches requirements. 33. The property owner shall keep and maintain all exterior building materials in good condition. 34. The property owner shall perform annual maintenance on the areas where Mesic Prairie seed mix is utilized. aJ 35. The brisk shall be integrally cast into the precast panels as discussed between the Council and the developer at their October 12,2020 meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THrS 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020, Mayor Attest:+M City Clerk 4 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. Page 1 of 9 PC Agenda Item – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: November 3, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-025 – No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Scannell Properties, LLC Property Location: 4200 Round Lake Road Request: Site Plan Review Requested Action Dan Salzer, Scannell Properties, LLC (“The Applicant”) has submitted a land use application for Site Plan Review for a project located at 4200 Road Lake Road (“Subject Property”). In October 2020, the City approved a Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development to the subject property that allowed for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. The Applicant is seeking approval for expansion of the parking lot in order to construct a parking area that was previously identified as proof of parking. The Subject Property is zoned GB, Gateway Business District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the Land Use Plan. Background 1. Overview of Request Scannell Properties was approved Resolution 2020-045 (Attachment D) for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) subject to 35 conditions on October 12, 2020 that was part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the subject property in order to operate a warehouse use in the facility to be constructed. The approximate 21 acre site is located south of the cul-de-sac on Gateway Boulevard and north of Interstate 694 and east of 35W. The Subject Property had been vacant since 2006 with wetlands located adjacent to Interstates (“35W and 694”). The site is highly visible from 694 and 35W. Separate access points to the site are provided via Gateway Boulevard for employee parking and deliveries. The site development will include office space, warehousing, ground level unloading access with 38 dock doors located on the north side of the building, and at-grade office parking lots located on the south side of the building. Page 2 of 9 One of the conditions from Resolution 2020-045 stated “Site Plan approval shall be required for the construction of the proof of parking area”. The Applicant has a prospective tenant that will occupy 2/3rd’s of the building which also necessitates the need for construction of this future parking area. Therefore, the Applicant is pursuing the Site Plan Review for expansion of the parking area. Plan Evaluation Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. Land Use Chart (GB Gateway Business District) – Section 1320.05 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided as Light Industrial and Office use. Light Industrial and Office (I/O) uses are areas designated for a broad range of light industrial uses such as warehousing with manufacturing. This land use may also include offices. According to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the expected share of uses within this area are 50 percent to 100 percent Light Industrial or up to 100 percent Office. The subject property is located in the GB, Gateway Business District. Warehouse is a conditional use in this district. 2. General Requirements - Sections 1325.05 and 1325.06 A. Parking and Site Operations – Meets Requirements The proposed Site Plan Review is not modifying any portion of the previously approved parking lot layout. The proof of parking area was identified on these earlier plans as a supplemental parking area. It was stated that this was conceptual in the event additional parking is required to meet the demands of a future tenant. The original approval for parking spaces, drive aisles, and layout with the building construction all remain unchanged as part of this review. Under the new site plan with the additional parking area, the Applicant is proposing to establish a fourth access onto Gateway Boulevard. This new access would be classified as an employee driveway access. The Zoning Code has access/driveway width standards for streets classified as minor and collector streets. However, Gateway Boulevard is classified as neither a minor or collector roadway and instead it is identified as a municipal state aid street. The Public Works Director/City Engineer is reviewing the proposed new access with regards to number of accesses requested, spacing, and sizing of driveway width. Based on the PUD approvals, the building would be a maximum of 85 percent warehouse and a minimum of 15 percent office. Per City Code, Business & Professional Office uses must provide one (1) parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The approved plans for the building identified the office floor area as 37,500 square feet and that would require 150 parking stalls. Other Business and Industry uses would need to provide one (1) for each employee on shift plus one (1) for each vehicle used in conducting the business or one (1) for each 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater. The Applicant had shown a floor area of 212,500 square feet and that would require 212 parking stalls. In October 2020, the approved plans depicted 363 parking spaces and the proposed uses required 362 stalls. As part of the October review, the Page 3 of 9 Applicant had noted the possibility of constructing the expanded parking area which would add 198 stalls. In total, the site would have 561 parking stalls. B. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Shown The GB district requires a 50 foot setback for parking areas from public streets and ROW. The Applicant has shown a 49.4 foot setback from the west property line facing 35W and a 28.2 foot setback from the north property line facing Gateway Boulevard ROW. Under the PUD, flexibility was approved for a 20 foot setback from Gateway Boulevard for the main parking area reviewed along with the building design. The proposed parking lot expansion aligns with the placement of the previously approved parking areas along Gateway Boulevard. It was noted during the last review that the proposed parking areas are located approximately 50 feet from the back of curb of Gateway Boulevard. Additionally, that several properties along Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard have similar or greater reduction in parking lot setbacks. If the Planning Commission feedback is generally supportive of site plans as submitted, the Applicant would be required to submit for a Planned Unit Development Amendment in order to seek approval of flexibility for parking setbacks. Site Plan Review authority is limited in approval to plans prepared in accordance with city codes. The Applicant would be required to amend the site plans to adhere to a 50 foot setback for the expanded parking area under the Site Plan Review. Planning Staff has included a recommended condition of approval that an amended site plan that complies with parking setbacks would be required for Zoning Department approval prior to issuance of permits. C. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Applicant has submitted a lighting plan that identifies pole heights and lumen levels at the property lines. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style and downward directed with flush lenses. The Applicant is proposing to use the same LED lighting to illuminate the parking areas as previously approved. Consistent with the previous approval, Staff recommends reiteration of the condition that all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. D. Trees along Street Frontage – Meets Requirements A minimum of one tree shall be provided along the right of way for every 50 feet of public street frontage. The proposed frontage on Gateway Boulevard is 1,484 feet and requires 30 trees. The Applicant is not proposing a reduction to the previously approved landscape plan which included the planting of 71 trees along the right of way adjacent to Gateway Boulevard area. In fact, the updated landscape plan shows the addition of one tree with the redesigned curbing. Page 4 of 9 E. Minimum Caliper Inches – Flexibility Granted Tree mitigation was not required as the current site had no trees deemed significant per City Code. The Zoning Code requires that a minimum number of caliper inches of trees be provided based on the gross square footage of the building on the property. A single story building in excess of thirty (30) feet in height shall be considered a two-story building for the purposes of determining gross square footage. The proposed building would be considered a two-stories, and includes 499,552 gross square feet. This requires a minimum of 1,561 caliper inches or 624 two (2) caliper trees. Flexibility was granted from this requirement as part of the previous approvals for the building construction. It was noted that the proposed site is limited to where trees can be planted onsite due the wetlands and overhead power lines. The Applicant was approved for the planting of 310 caliper inches or 110 trees. As part of this Site Plan Review for the parking lot expansion, the Applicant has included an additional planting of eight (8) trees. F. Tree Selection – Meets Requirements The proposed updated landscape plan includes a variety of tree species, including maples, oaks and evergreens, ranging in size from two and half (2.5) to six (6) caliper inches. This is consistent with ordinance requirements. The Applicant is proposing to plant six (6) to twelve (12) foot tall evergreens. G. Landscaped Area and Perennials and Shrubberies – Flexibility Granted Zoning Code requires 35 percent of the site to be landscaped or 339,674 square feet. The landscaping plan shows that the total landscaped area provided on the site is 652,668 square feet. The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 10 percent of the total landscaped area to be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The total landscaped area on the site is 652,668 square feet, resulting in the need for a minimum of 65,266 square feet of perennial and shrubbery cover. The Applicant has been approved for 2,888 square feet of perennial and shrub planting beds. In addition, the Applicant was approved for the use of over 170,000 square feet of Mesic Prairie seed mix onsite. Mesic Prairie is a prairie plant community dominated by native grasses such as big bluestem, switchgrasses and including abundant wildflowers. The updated landscaping plan shows the perimeter of the proposed parking lot expansion would still be planted with the Mesic Prairie seed mix. However, the updated plan includes an additional 108 shrubs and 151 perennials planted within the parking islands. The types of plantings are a variety of species consistent with the previously approved landscape plan. Gateway Boulevard Page 5 of 9 H. Drainage Wetlands and Flood Plain – Section 1325.05 Subd. 2 – Meets Requirements The City Code requires stormwater management be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration, and water quality requirements. The project was previously approved for construction of three (3) stormwater ponds. The first pond is located in the middle of the loading area. The other two (2) ponds were to be located adjacent to 694 and 35W. The proposed parking lot expansion would be constructed in the general area of the previously identified pond adjacent to 35W. It was noted in the October 2020 Staff Report that when the proof of parking stalls are needed that the Applicant would need to construct an underground retention area in the same area to replace the existing stormwater pond located adjacent to 35W. The Applicant as part of this Site Plan Review is proposing to construct an underground retention system. City code requires that off-street parking areas and drives shall be improved with a paved surface and that such areas shall be so graded and drained so as to dispose of all surface water accumulation within the area as required by the City and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Public Works Director/City Engineer is reviewing the underground retention system design and infiltration rates with regards to potential impacts of existing wetlands, public versus private runoff, and access to nearby utilities and easements. The parking lot expansion from a zoning review may seem simplistic, but that far be the case from a Public Works/Engineering standpoint. Planning Staff has included the Public Works Director/City Engineer preliminary comments under Additional Review. However given the complexity of this design and parking lot location with the logistics of easements, wetlands, and stormwater maintenance a full review will not be complete for inclusion with this report. Staff will work to have an update on the PW/Engineering review for the Commission at the meeting. In addition, the Applicant has indicated that the updated site plans and underground retention systems plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District, but they have not received a comment review letter or approval from the Watershed. Therefore, Planning Staff recommends Planning Commission consideration of a condition of Site Plan Review would be subject to approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Lastly, it should be noted that upon the determination of the Public Works Director/City Engineer that the proposed plans would be compliant then the Applicant would be required to apply for a separate land disturbance permit for construction of the parking expansion area. This work may not be completed under any of the previously issued permits for this project. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit for the parking lot expansion area, the Applicant shall submit an amended operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all onsite stormwater facilities subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The stormwater maintenance plan shall also require review of the City Attorney prior to approval of the City Council. This agreement needs to be fully executed prior to issuance of the land disturbance permit. 3. Easements The Subject Parcel was required to dedicate several easements as part of the platting process with the subdivision of land that occurred as part of the approvals for construction of the new building. The City required dedication of drainage and utility easements over the existing Page 6 of 9 wetlands on the property. In addition, the Subject Parcel has a Utility Easement and Power Line Easement in the general area of where the proposed parking lot expansion is to be located. The Applicant has indicated that following approval of the Site Plan that they would subsequently apply for an easement vacation and/or dedicate any new easements as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director/City Engineer for utility purposes. Planning Staff has included as a recommended condition the requirement for vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to the issuance of any land disturbance permits. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications Section 1355.04, Subd. 5 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code states that a public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review, but neighboring property owners shall be notified. Notification was prepared in accordance with City policy. Additional Review Building Inspector The Building Inspector has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. City code states that a building permit shall be required in such case where a commercial, industrial, public or semi-public land use is intending to construct on-site parking containing a site aggregate of more than four (4) spaces or a loading facility that is not a part of, or has prior approval as part of a site plan for which a building permit has been issued. Construction is underway for the office/warehouse building. Therefore, a building permit will be required prior to any construction taking place of the expanded parking lot area. Public Works Director/City Engineer Proposed Parking Expansion Page 7 of 9 The Public Works Director/City Engineer is currently finalizing the review of plans submitted for the parking lot expansion and underground retention system. The following is not intended to be a complete list of reviews, but rather a brief overview to provide the Planning Commission with preliminary list of items under review: 1. Stormwater Management and Maintenance 2. Underground Retention System 3. Easements 4. Access to Utilities 5. Driveway Accesses and Widths along Gateway Boulevard 6. Pond and Wetland Impacts Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. The Applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan Review to construct additional parking previously identified as “proof of parking” at the subject property 4200 Round Lake Road. 2. The Subject Property is located with the Gateway Business (“GB”) District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the 2040 Land Use Plan. 3. The Applicant operates under a Master Planned Unit Development and has been approved for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility on the Subject Property. 4. Flexibility through the PUD process was granted in the following areas: parking setbacks, minimum caliper inches, and perennials and shrubberies. 5. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. 6. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 7. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 8. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions. 9. The accessory off-street parking would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning Code. 10. A public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review. Proposed Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 025 for Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the Page 8 of 9 submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the November 3, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: 1) All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2) That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3) The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 4) A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion. 5) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system. 6) All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 7) A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 8) A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 9) All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 10) A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 11) The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 12) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 13) An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be presented to the City Engineer for review by the City Attorney and subject to City Page 9 of 9 Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit. 14) Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 15) Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area. 16) The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of setback flexibility as shown. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21- 025 for a Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the November 3, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 21-025 Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 21-025 for Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice and Comments Staff published a notice in the Pioneer Press as per City procedure. Public notices were mailed out on October 21, 2021. The mailing was sent to neighbors within 500 feet of the subject parcel. No comments have been received regarding this application as of October 27, 2021. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 6, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by December 4, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Site Plans D. Resolution 2020-045 Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2021 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Paul Vijums called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Paul Vijums, Commissioners Marcie Jefferys, Subbaya Subramanian, Kurtis Weber, and Jonathan Wicklund. Absent: Commissioners Steven Jones and Clayton Zimmerman. Also present were: City Planner Jessica Jagoe and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – NOVEMBER 3, 2021 Chair Vijums moved, seconded by Commissioner Wicklund, to approve the November 3, 2021, agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 6, 2021 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Wicklund moved, seconded by Commissioner Weber, to approve the October 6, 2021, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). PLANNING CASES A.Planning Case 21-025; 4200 Round Lake Road – Site Plan Review – Public Hearing Not Required City Planner Jagoe stated Scannell Properties was approved Resolution 2020-045 for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) subject to 35 conditions on October 12, 2020 that was part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the subject property in order to operate a warehouse use in the facility to be constructed. The approximate 21 acre site is located south of the cul -de-sac on Draft ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 2 Gateway Boulevard and north of Interstate 694 and east of 35W. The Subject Property had been vacant since 2006 with wetlands located adjacent to Interstates (“35W and 694”). The site is highly visible from 694 and 35W. Separate access points to the site are provided via Gateway Boulevard for employee parking and deliveries. The site development will include office space, warehousing, ground level unloading access with 38 dock doors located on the north side of the building, and at-grade office parking lots located on the south side of the building. One of the conditions from Resolution 2020-045 stated “Site Plan approval shall be required for the construction of the proof of parking area”. The Applicant has a prospective tenant that will occupy two-thirds of the building which also necessitates the need for construction of this future parking area. Therefore, the Applicant is pursuing the Site Plan Review for expansion of the parking area. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1.The Applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan Review to construct additional parking previously identified as “proof of parking” at the subject property 4200 Round Lake Road. 2.The Subject Property is located with the Gateway Business (“GB”) District and is guided as Light Industrial & Office on the 2040 Land Use Plan. 3.The Applicant operates under a Master Planned Unit Development and has been approved for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility on the Subject Property. 4.Flexibility through the PUD process was granted in the following areas: parking setbacks, minimum caliper inches, and perennials and shrubberies. 5.The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. 6.The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 7.The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 8.The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on traffic or parking conditions. 9.The accessory off-street parking would be in compliance with all provisions of the Zoning Code. 10.A public hearing is not required for Site Plan Review. City Planner Jagoe stated staff recommends approval of f Planning Case 21- 025 for Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the November 3, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: 1)All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2)That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3)The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 4)A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion.Draft ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 3 5)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system. 6)All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 7)A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 8)A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 9)All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 10)A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MNDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 11)The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 12)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documentation to the City as specified. 13)An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be presented to the City Engineer for review by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit. 14)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 15)Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area. 16)The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of setback flexibility as shown. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: Draft ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 4 1.Recommend Approval with Conditions 2.Recommend Approval as Submitted 3.Recommend Denial 4.Table Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Weber asked if the parking lot was adequately sized given the size of the building. City Planner Jagoe stated the parking lot will accommodate the entire capacity of the building. She discussed the required number of stalls and noted the site would be properly parked. Chair Vijums noted 362 parking spaces were required. He questioned why an additional 198 spaces were being added. City Planner Jagoe explained the City’s calculation for parking was based on the floor area of the building. She reported the developer has a tenant that is going to necessitate additional parking. Chair Vijums requested further comment from the applicant regarding the proposed parking. Dan Salzer, Scannell Properties, explained the 362 stalls was to meet the building square footage requirements for the City. He commented now that he has tenants, there was a need for more parking. He discussed how he was working to meet the needs of his tenant. Chair Vijums questioned if the change to working from home, or working virtually would create a shift in the parking needs for this property. Mr. Salzer indicated his tenant has looked into this but based on the tenants other location, the proposed parking would remain as is. Councilmember Holmes stated she was confused with why the tenant would require such a large number of parking spaces given the fact the chart shows a large portion of the building would be warehouse. Mr. Salzer discussed how the building would be divided between office, warehouse and lab space. He stated the additional 198 parking spaces were based on the tenants needs. He noted he could provide staff with an updated chart for the building space breakdown prior to the City Council meeting. Chair Vijums questioned if the additional 198 parking spaces were needed given the fact this would come at a great cost and disrupts a wetland. Mr. Salzer explained the site would have 40,000 square feet of office. He reported the tenant would be bringing a lot more employees to the building than was anticipated in the spec building. Draft ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 5 He commented whether 10 or more parking spaces were built, the underground stormwater system would still have to be built on this property. Commissioner Subramanian asked how the parking would be shared. Mr. Salzer stated the first tenant would have a pro-rata share of the parking spaces and the other tenant would receive the pro-rate share plus the additional 100 spaces. Commissioner Subramanian inquired if the proposed parking was based on the number of people proposed to be coming into the building and not the office/lab square footage. Mr. Salzer reported this was the case. Commissioner Subramanian commented this was a difficult matter for the Commission to consider because based on the size of the building, the proposed number of parking stalls was too high. Mr. Salzer indicated he was not proposing to impact any wetlands, rather he would be changing the way the water is treated on the site within a manmade structure. Commissioner Wicklund stated he may be interested in adding Condition 18 to read: The developer to confirm tenant usage and office/industrial split so that it aligns with current Arden Hills parking standards. Chair Vijums supported this recommendation. Further discussion ensued regarding the parking needs for the two tenants within this building. Commissioner Jefferys requested further information regarding how traffic patterns would be impacted with an additional 198 cars in this lot. Mr. Salzer commented given the location of this building the traffic would come in and out the same way. He stated he was asking for an additional access point. Chair Vijums suggested Condition 18 read: The applicant to provide City staff with information regarding additional employee numbers to confirm the need for 198 additional parking spaces. Councilmember Holmes reviewed the language within City Code regarding parking requirements. Mr. Salzer indicated the code was written as a minimum which meant he did not have to exactly hit this number. Rather, he was requesting to have more parking because his tenant would be bringing in more jobs to the community. Councilmember Holmes stated the City did not want too much parking on the site if it was not needed. She supported the applicant providing the City with additional information on why so many additional parking spaces were needed. Draft ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 6 Chair Vijums commented based on the discussion if appears the chart needs to be updated and the City needs proof for the additional parking spaces. He questioned if the Commission could take action on this item with these matters unresolved, or should the Planning Case be tabled. City Planner Jagoe stated she would leave this up to the Planning Commission. She noted additional conditions could be added to the Planning Case if the item were to move forward to the City Council for final approval. Chair Vijums indicated he was comfortable moving the item forward with conditions. Commissioner Weber stated if all of the additional spaces were not needed, then the infiltration basin would not be needed which would change the plans for the site. However, he understood the applicant has requested the parking based on the needs of their tenant. Mr. Salzer indicated he was asking for something that fell within code. He stated once his chart was updated, he would be meeting code, with a request for additional parking stalls given the number of new jobs that would be brought into the community. Commissioner Wicklund commented he believed the setbacks were adequate and noted he could support adding an additional 198 parking spaces. He recommended a condition be added to require the applicant to provide the City Council with additional information regarding the need for the extra parking spaces. Chair Vijums supported this recommendation. City Planner Jagoe reported staff would look for the applicant to provide a breakdown of uses within the building with the new tenants along with information as to why additional parking spaces were necessary. Commissioner Wicklund asked if there was a time constraint to make this decision tonight versus in a month. Mr. Salzer reported he would like to keep the project moving along because work on the stormwater treatment basin would be done over the winter months. Chair Vijums moved and Commissioner Wicklund seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-025 for a Site Plan Review at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the November 3, 2021, report to the Planning Commission, adding Condition 17 (The applicant shall be required to verify the caliper inches of trees to be planted and in necessary submit and updated landscaping plan reflective of the minimum caliper inches approved under the PUD) and Condition 18 (The Applicant shall confirm tenant usage in conformance with the Arden Hills parking standards and provide any explanation to exceed that standard). The motion carried unanimously (5-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. Draft Planning Case #21-025 –No Public Hearing Required Applicant: Scannell Properties, LLC Property Location: 4200 Round Lake Road Request: Site Plan Review 1 Overview Request •October 2020 –Scannell Properties was approved a Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development for construction of a 250,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. •CUP was approved with 35 conditions. Resolution 2020-45, Condition #12 states “Site Plan approval shall be required for the construction of the proof of parking area”. •The Applicant has a prospective tenant that will occupy 2/3rd’s of the building which necessitates the need for construction of this proof of parking area. 2 Land Use Chart •2040 Comprehensive Plan guided towards Light Industrial and Office •Zoning District –GB, Gateway Business •Warehouse allowed as a Conditional Use 3 Site Plan 4 Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Office – •1 space per 250 SF of office 37,500 150 Business and Industrial – •1 space per 1,000 SF of floor area 212,500 212 Site Total:362 363 Parking Counts –Information Requested •Table shows breakdown by Land Use as identified in PUD based on spec building •Applicant has not provided updated tenant data based on leased floor area and/or use •Parking space calculation for warehouse area or lab space would fall under the same category as “Other Business and Industry” uses •Seeking approval of additional 198 parking stalls previously identified as “Proof of Parking” •Site total would be = 561 parking spaces October 2020 -PUD approval by Land Use 5 Setbacks – Flexibility Shown •Gateway Business District –50 feet for parking areas from public streets and ROW •PUD approved 20 foot setback from Gateway Boulevard •Proposed Site Plan: 49.4 feet from 35W 18.2 feet from ROW Gateway Boulevard •Site Plan Review limited to plans prepared in accordance with city codes •Applicant seeks confirmation of flexibility granted applying to “proof of parking” •PUD Amendment would be required to seek flexibility for areas outside of previous PUD approvals 49.4 ft. 18.2 ft. 6 Lighting –Meets Requirements •Photometric Plan updated •Includes: •25’ light poles in parking lot •Same lighting to be used as approved in PUD 7 Trees along Street Frontage –Meets Requirements •City code = 1 tree for every 50 feet of street frontage •Project Minimum -30 trees •PUD Approved -71 trees •Site Plan Review -60 trees 8 Minimum Caliper Inches –Flexibility Granted •Site Minimum -1,561 caliper inches or 624 trees •PUD Approved -410 caliper inches or 141 trees •Site Plan Review -423 caliper inches or 137 trees. •Landscaping throughout site has been updated as part of Site Plan Review •Applicant is seeking approval of the updated landscaping plan in satisfaction of the caliper inches to be planted 9 Parking Islands – Flexibility Shown Parking Lot Area 10% Parking Island Proposed Parking Island Area Required Planting Island Trees Proposed Planting Island Trees PUD Approval – Oct. 2020 111,769 sq. ft.11,177 sq. ft.6,178 sq. ft.33 34 Site Plan Review -2021 179,395 sq. ft.17,940 sq. ft.18,444 sq. ft.44 41 •Applicant is seeking approval of the updated landscaping plan in satisfaction of minimum requirements under PUD flexibility granted 10 Landscaping –Flexibility Granted •Zoning Code –35% of the site to be landscaped and 10% to be covered with perennials and shrubbery •Site Minimum perennial and shrubbery coverage -65,266 square feet •PUD approved -2,888 square feet (857 plants) •Site Plan Review -9,234 square feet (additional 455 plants) •Applicant was approved for the use of over 170,000 square feet of Mesic Prairie seed mix onsite Updated landscaping plan reduces the prairie mix down to 43,545 square feet 11 Drainage –Recommended Conditions •Stormwater management must be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration, and water quality requirements •October 2020 “Proof of Parking” noted would construct an underground retention system •Recommended condition of approval subject to: Public Works Director/City Engineer MnDOT Rice Creek Watershed District MPCA Ramsey County Updated Stormwater Maintenance Plan 12 Easements – •Platting process dedicated several easements •Utility Easement and Power Line Easement in general area of proposed parking •Recommended condition of approval to vacate and/or dedicate any new easements as deemed necessary by PW Director/City Engineer 13 Ordinance Requirements GB District Standards PUD Approval Proposed Development Off-Street Parking Setbacks 50 feet from ROW Flexibility Previously Granted Flexibility Shown -20 feet Lighting Downward Directed Meets Requirements Trees Along Road Frontage Every 50 feet of public street frontage –i.e. 31 trees 60 trees Minimum Caliper Inches Based on Building Size –i.e. 1,561 caliper inches or 624 trees Flexibility Previously Granted 423 caliper inches or 137 trees Parking Islands 10% of parking area – i.e. 17,940 square feet Flexibility Previously Granted 18,444 square feet Parking Island Trees 1 per parking island –i.e. 44 Flexibility Shown -41 trees Tree Selection Minimum size at planting – Deciduous: 2.5 caliper inches Coniferous: 6 ft height Meets Requirements Landscape Area 35% of site –i.e. 399,755 square feet 573,685 square feet Perennials and Shrubs 10% of landscape area –i.e. 65,266 square feet Flexibility Previously Granted 9,234 square feet Drainage/Stormwater Mgmt Conversion to Underground Retention System Subject to several Recommended Conditions Plan Evaluation Summary – City Council to decide if the flexibility granted under the approved PUD also applies to the new parking and if the minimum code requirements would not apply, or does the proposed parking addition need to meet the minimum code requirements in the following areas: •Parking Setbacks •Minimum Caliper Inches •Parking Island Trees •Perennials and Shrubs 14 Deadline for Agency Action •The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 6, 2021. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by December 4, 2021 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. 15 Public Notice •Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on November 10, 2021. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. •No comments received. 16 •Recommend Approval with Conditions:Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the November 22, 2021 Report to the City Council, subject to the following conditions: 1)All conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. 2)That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3)The proposed parking area shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 4)A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed parking lot expansion. 5)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, engineering staff shall approve in writing the final design of parking lot expansion and underground retention system. 6)All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Other than wash or architectural lighting, attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lenses. If complaints are received the lighting adjacent to residential uses shall utilize house shields as directed by the City. In addition, any lighting under canopies (building entries) shall be recessed and use a flush lens. 7)A right of way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right of way. 8)A grading as-built and utility as-built plan shall be provided to the City upon completion of grading and utility work. 9)All fencing and retaining wall materials shall be complementary to the building materials and shall be approved in writing by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be engineered and detailed calculations shall be submitted to the City. 17 Options and Motion Language 10)A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the City’s Engineering Department prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County, MnDOT prior to the start of any site activities. 11)The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Tempora ry stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Appli cant. 12)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an amended stormwater facilities operation and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater facilities to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the appropriate documenta tion to the City as specified. 13)An amended Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be presented to the City Engineer for review by th e City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Stormwater Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement shall be fully executed prior to release of a land disturbance permit and building permit. 14)Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, all items identified in the Engineering Comment Letter dated November 5, 2021 shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. Including installation of any new access to the expanded pa rking area being constructed in accordance with municipal state aid specifications. 15)Prior to issuance of land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall be required to fully execute the vacation and/or dedication of easement(s) as determined by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to commencement of any site activities associated with the expanded “proof of parking” area. 16)The Applicant shall be required to submit revised site plans prepared in accordance with city code to the Zoning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building and/or land disturbance permits. Site Plan Review does not include approval of setback flexibility as shown. 17)The Applicant shall be required to verify the caliper inches of trees to be planted and if necessary submit an updated landscaping plan reflective of the minimum caliper inches approved under the PUD. 18)The Applicant shall confirm tenant uses in conformance with Arden Hills parking standards and provide an explanation for spac es in excess of code requirements. 18 •Approval without Conditions: Motion to adopt Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, and the November 22, 2021 Report to the City Council. •Denial:Motion to deny Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road based on the following findings of fact: the City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. •Table:Motion to table Resolution 2021-066, approving Planning Case 21-025, for Site Plan Review for Scannell Properties, LLC at 4200 Round Lake Road for the following reasons: the City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. 19 Options and Motion Language Planning Case 21-025 –Scannell Properties Site Plan Review 20 Questions?