Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-25-22-R
APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES STAFF COMMENTS Transportation Update David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF Night To Unite Update Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Elections Update Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 27, 2022 Regular City Council 06 -27 -22 -R.PDF July 11, 2022 Special City Council Work Session 07 -11 -22 -SWS.PDF July 11, 2022 Regular City Council 07 -11 -22 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve 2022 2nd Quarter Financials Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve Transfer Fund Balance From General Fund To PIR Capital Fund Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Quote For Replacement Of Control Panel –Lift Station No. 14 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 –T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. –Snelling Avenue North Street And Utility Improvements Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Payment Of Invoice For Watermain Break On Parkshore Drive –St. Paul Utilities David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 2022 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 22 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2022 -039 And Resolution 2022 -040) And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Fran Holmes Steve Scott David Radziej Regular City Council Agenda July 25, 2022 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 4. 4.A. Documents: 4.B. Documents: 4.C. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation Update David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF Night To Unite Update Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Elections Update Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 27, 2022 Regular City Council 06 -27 -22 -R.PDF July 11, 2022 Special City Council Work Session 07 -11 -22 -SWS.PDF July 11, 2022 Regular City Council 07 -11 -22 -R.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve 2022 2nd Quarter Financials Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve Transfer Fund Balance From General Fund To PIR Capital Fund Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Quote For Replacement Of Control Panel –Lift Station No. 14 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 –T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. –Snelling Avenue North Street And Utility Improvements Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Payment Of Invoice For Watermain Break On Parkshore Drive –St. Paul Utilities David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 2022 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 22 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2022 -039 And Resolution 2022 -040) And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesSteve ScottDavid Radziej Regular City Council Agenda July 25, 2022 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A. Documents: 4.B. Documents: 4.C. Documents: 5. 5.A. Documents: 5.B. Documents: 5.C. Documents: 6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFNight To Unite UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFElections UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJune 27, 2022 Regular City Council06-27 -22 -R.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Special City Council Work Session 07 -11 -22 -SWS.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Regular City Council07-11 -22 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve 2022 2nd Quarter Financials Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Motion To Approve Transfer Fund Balance From General Fund To PIR Capital Fund Gayle Bauman, Finance Director MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Quote For Replacement Of Control Panel –Lift Station No. 14 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 2 –T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. –Snelling Avenue North Street And Utility Improvements Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Payment Of Invoice For Watermain Break On Parkshore Drive –St. Paul Utilities David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 2022 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 22 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2022 -039 And Resolution 2022 -040) And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesSteve ScottDavid Radziej Regular City Council Agenda July 25, 2022 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:6. 6.A. Documents: 6.B. Documents: 6.C. Documents: 6.D. Documents: 6.E. Documents: 6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFNight To Unite UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFElections UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJune 27, 2022 Regular City Council06-27 -22 -R.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Special City Council Work Session 07 -11 -22 -SWS.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Regular City Council07-11 -22 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve 2022 2nd Quarter FinancialsGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve Transfer Fund Balance From General Fund To PIR Capital FundGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Quote For Replacement Of Control Panel –Lift Station No. 14 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 2 –T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. –Snelling Avenue North Street And Utility Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Payment Of Invoice For Watermain Break On Parkshore Drive –St. Paul UtilitiesDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 2022 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 22 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2022 -039 And Resolution 2022 -040) And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City Planner MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesSteve ScottDavid Radziej Regular City Council Agenda July 25, 2022 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F. Documents: 7. 8. 8.A. Documents: 9. 9.A. Documents: 10. 11. APPROVAL OF AGENDAPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESSTAFF COMMENTSTransportation UpdateDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFNight To Unite UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFElections UpdateJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFAPPROVAL OF MINUTESJune 27, 2022 Regular City Council06-27 -22 -R.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Special City Council Work Session 07 -11 -22 -SWS.PDFJuly 11, 2022 Regular City Council07-11 -22 -R.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve 2022 2nd Quarter FinancialsGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFMotion To Approve Transfer Fund Balance From General Fund To PIR Capital FundGayle Bauman, Finance DirectorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Quote For Replacement Of Control Panel –Lift Station No. 14 David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 2 –T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. –Snelling Avenue North Street And Utility Improvements ProjectDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Payment Of Invoice For Watermain Break On Parkshore Drive –St. Paul UtilitiesDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSPlanning Case 2022 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch PropertiesJessica Jagoe, City PlannerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFATTACHMENT K.PDFATTACHMENT L.PDFATTACHMENT M.PDFATTACHMENT N.PDFNEW BUSINESSPlanning Cases 22 -012 –Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2022 -039 And Resolution 2022 -040) And Site Plan Review –3737 Lexington Avenue N And 1133 Grey Fox Road –Launch Properties Jessica Jagoe, City PlannerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenFran HolmesSteve ScottDavid Radziej Regular City Council Agenda July 25, 2022 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.4.A.Documents:4.B.Documents:4.C.Documents:5.5.A.Documents:5.B.Documents:5.C.Documents:6.6.A.Documents:6.B.Documents:6.C.Documents:6.D.Documents:6.E.Documents:6.F.Documents:7.8.8.A.Documents:9.9.A.Documents: 10. 11. Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 4A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: July 25, 2022 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Transportation Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 4B MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Night to Unite Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Acknowledgement of the attached Proclamation supporting Night to Unite 2022. Background/Discussion Staff provided updates regarding Night to Unite at the June 27 and July 11 Council meetings. As of July 15th, there were 14 registered events. Staff will provide the City Council with a verbal update regarding the number of registered events at the July 25 City Council meeting and will also provide the list of event locations once received from the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office. This list will also be published on the City’s website. Attached is a Proclamation provided by the RCSO regarding Arden Hills’ support of Night to Unite. Attachments Attachment A: Proclamation WHEREAS, the Minnesota Crime Prevention Association, along with AAA, and local law enforcement agencies are sponsoring a statewide program called Night to Unite on August 2, 2022; and WHEREAS, Night to Unite is designed to get to know one another in the City of Arden Hills, build neighborhood involvement by bringing police and communities together; and to bring an awareness to crime prevention and local law enforcement efforts; and WHEREAS, Night to Unite supports the idea that crime prevention is an inexpensive, effective tool in strengthening police and community partnerships; and WHEREAS, Night to Unite provides opportunities to celebrate the ongoing work of law enforcement and neighborhoods in Arden Hills by working together to fight crime and victimization and increase public safety for all citizens; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Arden Hills play an important role in assisting the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office through joint crime, drug and violence prevention efforts; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor David Grant, and WE, Council Members, Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Steve Scott, and David Radziej, DO HEREBY CALL UPON ALL CITIZENS OF ARDEN HILLS, RAMSEY COUNTY, to participate in Night to Unite on Tuesday, August 2, 2022. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, Mayor David Grant, and WE, Council Members, Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Steve Scott, and David Radziej do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 2, 2022, as Night to Unite in Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Mayor, David Grant Council Member, Brenda Holden Council Member, Fran Holmes Council Member, Steve Scott Council Member, David Radziej July 25, 2022 Attested by: _________________________ Date City Administrator, Dave Perrault Night to Unite 2022 Proclamation CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Page 1 of 1 STAFF COMMENTS – 4C MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: July 25, 2022 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Elections Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. Approved: July 25, 2022 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 27, 2022 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, David Radziej, and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; City Planner Jessica Jagoe; City Attorney Joel Jamnik; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. The motion carried (5-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Kathryn Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, stated she has been a resident of Arden Hills for the past 36 years. She explained on February 2 she attended an open house via Zoom for the intersection of County Road E and Lake Johanna Boulevard. She expressed frustration around the lack of communication for the roundabout, as well as, the fact that it appears the County has already made their decision. She commented that she rarely sees congestion at the intersection, and pedestrian safety was important to her. She was of the opinion the four-way stop was working at this intersection. She commented further on her frustration with the entire planning process and questioned why the taxpayers were not included. She was of the opinion the County and the City were more concerned about capacity than the concerns of residents that live in this neighborhood. She discussed the grade changes at the intersection and noted roundabouts were not recommended in areas with a grade change of more than 4%. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 2 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 4. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported Lexington Avenue remains closed to northbound traffic and was restricted to one lane southbound from I-694 to County Road E. He stated concrete paving of the northbound lanes began last Thursday and once the concrete has cured, traffic will be transitioned onto the new lanes. He commented further on the detours that were in place, noting this project would last until mid-July. Staff commented further on the water main replacement and elevation of the roadway. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen updated the Council on the MNDOT median cable barrier project on Highway 51 stating traffic was open to two lanes. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained the final paving for the City Hall parking lot occurred last Friday and striping will take place in the next couple of weeks. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the Old Snelling street and utility improvements project was mostly complete, except for a few pedestrian ramps. B. Night to Unite Update City Clerk Hanson stated individuals interested in hosting a Night to Unite event are encouraged to register their gathering by Friday, July 15 in order to ensure a deputy visit. Events may also be visited by fire department personnel and community officials. The City also has information about Night to Unite, including the link for online registration, available on the website’s main page under News and Announcements. She noted residents wishing to donate school supplies can bring items to their local neighborhood event or drop the items off at the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office located at 1411 Paul Kirkwold Drive. C. Elections Update City Clerk Hanson stated absentee/early voting for the August 9 Primary began Friday, June 24. She reported absentee/early in-person voting could be done at the Ramsey County Elections Office in St. Paul or the Ramsey County Library in Roseville. She explained ballots could also be requested via mail by contacting the Ramsey County Elections office. She encouraged residents with further questions to contact City Hall. She reported the City would have four seats on the November 8 general election ballot, the Mayor, two Council seats (four year terms) and one Council seat (two year term). She commented further on the filing period for the Council seats. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 13, 2022, Regular City Council ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 3 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the June 13, 2022, Regular City Council meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried (5-0). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-035 – Charitable Gambling License Renewals for Chops, Inc. Minnesota Fastpitch and Spring Lake Park Lions C. Motion to Approve Extension of Regular Leave without Pay for Arden Hills Employee D. Motion to Approve 2022 Street Maintenance Program – Public Works Costs E. Motion to Approve Public Works 2022 CIP Replacement Equipment Purchases F. Motion to Approve Purchase of Shelter/Shade Structures for Perry Park – Spring Lake Park Lions Donation MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (5-0). 7. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Wide Speed Limit John Morast, HR Green, stated Minnesota Statute 169.14 Speed Limits, Zones; Radar regulates highway and roadway speeds in Minnesota. Subdivision 2 sets maximum speed limits on a variety of roads within a Municipality, such as 10 mph in alleys, 30 mph in urban districts, and 25 mph on residential roadways, if adopted by the road authority. In August 2019, the Minnesota Legislature changed the Statutes governing speed limits on city streets. The changes allow cities to establish speed on roads under the City’s jurisdiction, other than the statutory limits, without conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. Any speed limit changes must be implemented in a consistent and understandable manner. “The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit. A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set speed limits based on the city's safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum, the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the change to the public.” City Council has discussed speed limit changes on various roads, and for a city-wide reduction on City owned and maintained streets, for a speed limit reduction from 30 MPH to 25 MPH. Mayor Grant asked if Mr. Morast had gone through this process with other cities. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 4 Mr. Morast explained he was going through this process with North Oaks and he has talked with many other cities about this process. Mayor Grant commented the City of Minneapolis had already changed their speed limit to 20 miles per hour. Councilmember Holmes stated most City streets had a residential speed limit of 30 MPH and the Council was proposing to reduce this to 25 MPH. She noted the speed along Lake Valentine Road and Old Snelling was still up for discussion. Councilmember Holden asked if MSA roads could be subject to the City-wide speed limit change. Mr. Morast reported MSA roadways would be subject to a City-wide speed limit change. Mayor Grant explained County roads would not be within the purview of a speed limit change, which included County Road E, New Brighton Road and Lake Johanna Boulevard. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Raymond Kreps, 1676 Chatham Avenue, reported he was a 42 year member of this community. He questioned why the City was considering a change. He was of the opinion a speed limit change on residential streets was not necessary at this time. Noreen Tyler, 3200 Lake Lane, stated she opposed the speed limit change. She encouraged the City to spend this money to improve crosswalks in the community. She feared that a speed limit change would adversely impact minorities within the City. Kurtis Weber, 4453 Old Highway 10, reported he fully supported lowering the speed limit across the City. He explained he worked for Hennepin County and he believed there had been a great response to lowering the speed limit in other communities. He commented further on the cost to replace speed limit signs within the City. Mayor Grant noted for the record the City Council had received an email in support of lowering the speed limits to 25 MPH. Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. B. Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Finance Director Bauman stated water customers whose accounts are 90 days past due were informed that the City intends to certify delinquent charges to Ramsey County to be collected with property taxes. These customers have the right to a hearing in front of the City Council to discuss this matter prior to certification. Staff requested the Council hold a public hearing for the quarterly special assessments for delinquent utilities. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 5 With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. C. Planning Case 22-011 Amending Chapter 13 Sections 1320.085, Subd. 3, 1320.09, Subd. 3, 1320.10 Subd. 4 and 1325.04, Subd. 1.B (Drive Up Windows/Drive Lanes) City Planner Jagoe stated at the April 18th work session, the City Council discussed possible topics that could be considered for holding a Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission. Reviewing potential topics in advance would allow planning staff an opportunity to research content and flexibility for scheduling the joint meeting at a later date based on planning case submissions. From this discussion, the Council decided that fences, drive-thru commercial districts and home occupation deliveries would be worked on by staff. Topics for a future joint meeting would be signage and infill ordinances. Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission for the first review and to hold a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the draft ordinance language with recommendation of the Planning Commission would be brought to the City Council for subsequent discussion and adoption. City Planner Jagoe provided an overview of the Ordinance Amendment stating staff has prepared a draft ordinance showing language to be removed and added in red font for your review. The general consensus of the Council was that the consumer preference for drive-up, drive-thru, and curbside pickup for restaurants and retail markets has changed dramatically over the past couple of years. The City in a number of instances has approved flexibility to the city code requirements for proximity to other establishments under the Planned Unit Development process to allow drive-thru windows and businesses within a closer distance of each other. Therefore, the Council directed the review of our current ordinance language which requires a separation of 1,320 feet (i.e. 0.25 miles) between these types of businesses. Staff commented further on the proposed ordinance amendment and requested the Council hold a public hearing. Councilmember Holden reported this change would update City Code to allow all businesses consideration of a drive-thru window, as was done during COVID. City Planner Jagoe reported this was the case. Mayor Grant commented on how many businesses have transitioned to drive-up windows during and post COVID. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. D. Planning Case 22-009 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (1700 West Highway 96 – Trident Development) City Planner Jagoe stated at their February 22, 2022 meeting, the City Council reviewed a concept plan from Trident Development for the development of the northwest corner of the North Heights Lutheran Church property at 1700 Highway 96 W. Trident Development was proposing a 115-125 unit senior apartment development (apartments only, the proposed will not have an ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 6 assisted living or memory care component). The Applicant indicated their intention would be to subdivide and purchase approximately 10.27 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property. In preparation for the February 22, 2022 meeting, the Developer had held a neighborhood meeting to garner resident feedback. At the meeting, residents voiced concerns regarding traffic, additional park demand, and noise concerns. City Planner Jagoe explained for a residential project to be feasible on the site, Trident would need to amend the Comprehensive Plan. This Planning Case is only focused on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments and a proposed project for this property would come forward at a future meeting for review. At this stage, the City is being asked to amend the vision for future growth and development for this property. The Comprehensive Plan is the planning tool that guides the future development of land irrespective of a specific project. City Planner Jagoe reported following the review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the Applicant will be required to submit another land use application for the development approvals. Based on the concept review plans, staff believes a future land use application for a proposed project would require the following land use requests: • Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Subdivision • Vacation of Easements (i.e. drainage/wetland) • Rezoning of the development site from B-1, Limited Business and R-1 – Single- Family Residential District to R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District • Conditional Use Permit for Multiple Family Dwelling in the R-4 District • Master and Final Planned Unit Development City Planner Jagoe commented further on the Comprehensive Plan requirements, along with the application review process and recommended the Council hold a public hearing. Councilmember Holden stated she was struggling with this request because the City Council did not have a clear understanding of what would be going onto this property. She explained without knowing where the new building would be placed and how many trees would be lost, she was having a difficult time supporting the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. She asked if the entire parking lot on the site would be changed. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the proposed area that would be changed to high density residential as the future land use designation under the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Holden recalled North Heights Church had requested to build dorms in the past and asked if the senior housing proposal would help the church survive. She explained she lived near Presbyterian Homes and stated after the expansion she did not see an increase in traffic. She questioned what defined neighborhood character. City Planner Jagoe stated she did not have a specific definition, but anticipated this was defined by building materials, the design of a building, similar residential use, and landscaping. City Attorney Jamnik commented on the subjective determination and the mix of properties in this area. He discussed the potential uses for this site noting the Council does not have a specific ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 7 request before them to consider. He reported the Council was considering the long-term vision for this area with the surrounding uses being neighborhood and a church. Mayor Grant discussed how difficult it would be for the Council to separate the two, the request before the Council for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and the future plans for the site (potential senior housing project). Councilmember Scott asked if the 10.7 acres being requested for rezoning would remain tax exempt. City Planner Jagoe stated the zoning of the property was not being considered this evening. She explained this would come with a future application and if the land use were to change this would be evaluated by Ramsey County. Mayor Grant commented on the uses that were allowed within the Institutional zoning district. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Roger Fink, Trident Development, stated he was a representative for the applicant. He thanked the Council for considering his request. He understood it was difficult to act on this request without knowing what come to the City in the future. He discussed his concept plans noting Trident was under contract with the church to acquire this site. He reported the conceptual plans include a three story, 124-unit senior living building with an underground parking lot. He indicated this plan remains consistent. He stated the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was the first step in the application process. He indicated as part of the site improvements he would be resurfacing and restriping both the churches parking lot and the new senior living parking lot. He explained there was a growing need for independent senior housing in Arden Hills. He believed this was a perfect location for this concept. He indicated Trident Development would be the owner of this property so that tax status would change. He thanked staff for providing the Council with a detailed staff report and noted his application could be modified to show a land use change only on the land the senior housing project was on and not the entire North Heights property. John Oldfield, North Heights Church, commented on the concern the Planning Commission raised regarding the tree loss. He noted he shared this concern. He reported he has had volunteers plant over 700 trees on the North Heights campus over the past year in order to maintain the beauty of the property. He reported at the last special meeting of the church 86% of the members voted in favor to support the selling the property for this development. In addition, over 70 members have expressed an interest in renting units in this building. He indicated North Heights has had a long term goal of owning high density residential property and would like to have a first right of refusal on the Trident senior housing. TJ Anderson, senior pastor at North Heights Church, explained North Heights has been committed to the care and support of the community. He stated as the population ages, the church was considering how to care for the physical, spiritual, mental and emotional needs of the elderly. He believed it was important to address the changing demographics in Arden Hills. He discussed the Young at Heart ministry within North Heights Church, which was a group that was working to address the needs of the 55+ community. He commented on how this population was often ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 8 overlooked, isolated and disconnected. He noted he had staff members and many volunteers committed to work with the aging population. He was excited about the opportunity to move forward with the proposed project. Kurtis Weber, 4453 Old Highway 10, indicated the applicant has now testified what they intend to do on this property. He stated he served on the Planning Commission, but noted he was speaking as a resident that lives near the subject property. He reported at the Planning Commission meeting Trident discussed how important it was to have support from the neighborhood. However, after hearing much resistance from the neighbors and a recommendation for denial from the Planning Commission, Trident has opted to move the request forward. He explained this indicates to him that neither North Heights Church or Trident Development are concerned with what the neighborhood thinks, if they believe the Council will offer support. He commented he received 28 signatures from his neighbors that do not support the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He then read a letter in full for the record stating his reasons for not supporting this request. He encouraged the Council to consider the number of neighbors that oppose this request and deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. Gunnar Unger, 1700 Highway 96, stated he was a representative of North Heights Church. He understood the neighbors had with this development but noted the property had a large buffer to the east, roadways to the west and no residents to the north. He believed the impact to the neighbors was quite small given the distance these neighbors were from the proposed project. He commented on the traffic impact, stating he believed it would be minimal because seniors did their traveling throughout the day and would not surge during the AM and PM peak traffic times. Ryan Jenner, 1555 McClung, indicated he believed this project would adversely impact the neighborhood in many ways. He stated there was already increased traffic along McClung and Colleen from the church because this was the route to Hamline Avenue. He reported the lack of a plan for direct access to Highway 96 was concerning to him. He believed this area was not feasible for high-density residential given the poor access to the site. He discussed how the TCAAP site would provide senior housing and recommended the North Heights Church property not be reguided for high density residential. He noted his wife was a realtor and it was his understanding the community needed more single family homes. He suggested single family homes be considered for this property and not high density residential. He feared that the community was building too many senior housing units at this time and they would all turn into low income housing in the future. He reported he was not against low income housing, but rather was against all of the traffic that would come with the new senior housing development and how it would change the character of the neighborhood. He believed that making this change without detailed plans was indefensible. Jim Ostlund, 1576 Royal Hills Drive, indicated he has lived in his home for 30+ years. He noted this is the third or fourth proposal that came from North Heights Church. He was of the opinion this was the best proposal to come forward. He understood North Heights wanted to develop the northwest corner. He explained he worked in banking and he understood development came with increased traffic. He recommended additional buffering be put in place and encouraged the Council to put a lot of conditions in place with the PUD. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 9 Luke Hemken, 4444 Snelling Avenue North, stated he supported his neighbors and implored the Council to hear the concerns of the neighbors, noting the majority was not in support of this. Noreen Tyler, 3200 Lake Lane, explained she does not live near the project area. She understood the developer and the church wants to get the zoning change so their plans can move forward. She did not understand why the Council should change the zoning without having plans in place. She commented after viewing Trident Development’s website she believed their plans were boring and bland. Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution 2022-036 Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Mayor Grant noted the presentation was previously given by Director Bauman and noted it was a quarterly item the Council considered. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #2022-036 – Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities to Ramsey County. The motion carried (5-0). B. Ordinance 2022-004 Amending Chapter 13 Sections 1320.085, Subd. 3, 1320.09, Subd. 3, 1320.10 Subd. 4, and 1325.04, Subd. 1.B – Planning Case 22- 011 (Drive Up Window/Drive Lanes) and Authorization for Publication of Summary Ordinance City Planner Jagoe stated the City Council was asked to hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 22-011 under Agenda Item 8C. A full evaluation of the proposed amendment and supporting documents are included in the staff report under Agenda Item 8C. The remainder of this memo focuses on the requested approvals, findings of fact and the staff recommended options and motion language. Staff offered the following Findings of Fact for the Council’s consideration: 1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language to allow the City Council to add conditions of approval for uses with drive-up windows and drive lanes through a Planned Unit Development. 2. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning Code of the City Code. 3. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. 4. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 8, 2022. City Planner Jagoe reported the Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their June 8, 2022 meeting and recommended approval of Planning Case 22-011 for a Zoning Code Amendments in ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 10 Sections 1320.085 - Subd. 3, 1320.09 - Subd. 3, 1320.10 – Subd. 4, 1325.04 – Subd. 1.B of the Arden Hills City Code for the business zoning districts that would amend language requiring a distance of separation between drive-up businesses by a 6-0 vote. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2022-004 and authorize publication of a summary ordinance for Planning Case 22-011 for Zoning Code Amendments in Sections 1320.085 - Subd. 3, 1320.09 - Subd. 3, 1320.10 – Subd. 4, 1325.04 – Subd. 1.B of the Arden Hills City Code for the business zoning districts to remove the requirement for a distance of separation between drive-up businesses, and allows the City Council to add conditions for approval of uses with drive-up windows and drive lanes based on the findings of fact and the June 27, 2022 Report to the City Council. Councilmember Scott commented he brought this item forward to the City Council and stated he was pleased this Ordinance was being approved as it would allow greater flexibility for businesses with drive-thrus or drive-up windows. The motion carried (5-0). C. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Planning Case 22-009 (1700 West Highway 96 – Trident Development) City Planner Jagoe stated at the February 22, 2022 meeting, the City Council reviewed a concept plan from Trident Development for the development of the northwest corner of the North Heights Lutheran Church property at 1700 Highway 96 W. Trident Development was proposing a 115-125 unit senior apartment development (apartments only, the proposed will not have an assisted living or memory care component). The Applicant indicated their intention would be to subdivide and purchase approximately 10.27 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property. For a residential project to be feasible on the site, Trident would need to amend the Comprehensive Plan. This Planning Case is only focused on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments and a proposed project for this property would come forward at a future meeting for review. At this stage, the City is being asked to amend the vision for future growth and development for this property. The Comprehensive Plan is the planning tool that guides the future development of land irrespective of a specific project City Planner Jagoe explained the City Council must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. At their June 8, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend denial of Planning Case 22-009. The Planning Commission had concerns with traffic, access, noise, neighborhood character, and the potential for additional high density units in this neighborhood. The Planning Commission was presented with the following findings of fact for City Council consideration: 1. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use for the Subject Property as P/I, Public and Institutional. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 11 2. The Applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the future land use designation of approximately 10.75 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property to HDR, High Density Residential. 3. The 30 +/- acres of developed land on the Subject Property would remain guided as P/I, Public and Institutional. 4. The Applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to modify the boundaries described in existing language of Chapter 6 to include the Subject Property. 5. The proposed text amendment incorporates a defined area of land west of Snelling Avenue North to existing Comprehensive Plan language that allows an increase in the maximum density as part of a Planned Unit Development. 6. The applicant represented the application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community as a whole. 7. The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to establish the policies that guide the future physical and community development of Arden Hills. 8. The Metropolitan Council has previously approved similar amendments adding language supporting increasing the densities above the maximum permitted in a specific land use district. 9. The proposed map and text amendments have been discussed with the Metropolitan Council. City Planner Jagoe reported the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their June 8, 2022, meeting. At that time, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Case 22-009 for two amendments to Chapter 6, Land Use of the Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan by a 5-1 vote. Councilmember Holden asked when the City would be able to address the right-in, right-out from the church in order to address the traffic concerns from the neighbors. City Attorney Jamnik reported this would be addressed with the PUD application and site plan approval. He stated from a traffic management standpoint, this was very difficult to regulate. Councilmember Holden explained the Council had to ensure the community was well served, while taking into consideration the concerns of the neighbors. She commented on the previous proposals from North Heights Church, one that included a large number of townhouses. Councilmember Holmes stated she was not struggling with this request. She reported the Council held a worksession and discussed the proposed Trident Development. In addition, a neighborhood meeting was held. She understood not all of the details have been worked out, but the Council has a good idea what would be constructed. She indicated this plan would not be coming before the Council unless Trident had a plan in place. She was of the opinion this was the first step in moving this development forward and she supported this application moving forward. Mayor Grant asked if an agreement was in place between Trident Development and North Heights Church. Roger Fink, Trident Development, explained he had a written agreement with North Heights to purchase the proposed tract of land once it is subdivided. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 12 Councilmember Holden stated she recalled the development would have 105 units. City Planner Jagoe reported the developers concept plan had a range of units and noted the developer was proposing to have 124 units. She indicated high density residential allows for nine to twelve units per acre. She noted the number of units had been reduced to 124 in order to account for the land that was designated as wetlands. Mr. Fink stated the original plan was to purchase 10.27 acres and this was renegotiated in order to accommodate the wetlands and stormwater on the site. Trident was now requesting to purchase 10.75 acres of land in order to accommodate 12+ units per acre. He anticipated the request that would come to the Council would be about 14 units per acre, when all of the wetlands and stormwater land was removed from the property. Mayor Grant requested staff speak to the history of this property. City Planner Jagoe provided a detailed history of this property. It was noted the site was guided for Public and Institutional in 1998. Mayor Grant reported this property was bordered by Highway 10 and Highway 96 and two churches, which made it a difficult property to develop. Councilmember Scott explained he lived in the Briarknoll neighborhood and he agreed this was the best option to come to the City thus far. He indicated he would be supporting the comprehensive plan amendment because it gives the City additional flexibility in the future. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve Planning Case 22-009 for a Future Land Use Map and Chapter 6 Text Amendments to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at 1700 Highway 96 West, based on the findings of fact and the report submitted to the City Council on June 27, 2022, and direct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution. Mayor Grant encouraged Trident Development to work carefully with the community on this project. He stated he would be supporting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He then asked staff to complete a roll call vote for this item. Councilmember Holden noted she would not be supporting this request. She stated she did not support 14+ units per acre on this property and she could not support this moving forward until she knew what the plan was. A roll call vote was taken. The motion to approve Planning Case 22-009 for a Future Land Use Map and Chapter 6 Text Amendments to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at 1700 Highway 96 West, based on the findings of fact and the report submitted to the City Council on June 27, 2022, carried 4-1 (Councilmember Holden opposed). D. Resolution 2022-037 Variance - 4073 Valentine Court – Planning Case 22-008 ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 13 City Planner Jagoe stated 4073 Valentine Court, the Subject Property, is zoning R-1, Single Family Residential District. It is designated for Low Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The subject property is the site of a single-family dwelling owned by the Applicant. All surrounding parcels are also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District and designated for Low Density Residential Uses in the Lane Use Plan. The Subject Property is a legal non-conforming lot. The current structure is located approximately 20 feet from the side yard property line and today’s minimum side yard setback on a corner lot is 40 feet. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the Site Data, Plan Evaluation and offered the following Findings of Fact: 1. The odd and unusual shape of the lot and topography are unique characteristics of the Subject Property, and those factors restrict alternative options for increased accessory storage. 2. There is limited ability to extend the existing driveway to a detached structure in another location, and single family residential properties are limited to one driveway access per property so a second driveway access would not be permitted off of Valentine Avenue. 3. The garage addition will not impede sight lines or obstruct the clear vision area from the roadways. 4. This is a legal nonconforming lot that was developed in 1953 at which time City Code allowed a 10 foot side yard setback. The scope or scale of the variance request is to locate the proposed garage at a 7.82 foot setback. City Planner Jagoe reported the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their June 8, 2022, meeting. At that time, they recommended approval with conditions of Planning Case 22- 008 to decrease the required side yard setback from 40 feet to 7.82 feet from the northwest side yard property line at 4073 Valentine Court by a 6-0 vote. Councilmember Holden asked if any of the pine trees would be removed. City Planner Jagoe stated the applicant has not stated that any of the pine trees within the right of way would be removed as part of this application. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2022-037, approving Planning Case 22-008, for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court as presented in the June 27, 2022 Report to the City Council as amended by the conditions as recommended by staff. Councilmember Holden requested further information regarding the setback. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the garage placement and the proposed setbacks for the property if the garage were constructed. Councilmember Holmes stated she was not in support of this variance. She indicated she did not believe a three car garage was a must in Arden Hills and noted the Council has denied other variances requests for three car garages. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 14 Mayor Grant was of the opinion this was a unique request because the property owner had a 20 foot buffer in the side yard. While he did not like expanding legal non-conforming uses, he was willing to make an exception with this case. Councilmember Scott commented the last time this variance came before the Council he supported the request, along with the late Councilmember McClung. He stated this property had a great deal of cover, noted the garage would be well screened and the neighbors generally supported the request. For this reason, he would be supporting the variance request. The motion to adopt Resolution 2022-037, approving Planning Case 22-008, for a Variance at 4073 Valentine Court as presented in the June 27, 2022 Report to the City Council as amended by the conditions as recommended by staff carried 4-1 (Councilmember Holmes opposed). 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Radziej noted he attended the State Farm Open House and he wished Samantha Ferrell all the best with her new agency. Councilmember Radziej wished everyone a safe and happy 4th of July weekend. Councilmember Scott reported he attended the PTRC’s park tour last week where the group visited Hazelnut, Sampson and Floral Parks. He noted the PTRC has vacancies and is looking for additional volunteers. Councilmember Holmes noted the Council received an email from a resident concerning the City’s lack of a sound ordinance. She supported the Council improving its noise ordinance in order to address this concern. Councilmember Holden thanked Public Works for spraying the tennis courts. Councilmember Holden noted she attended the League of Minnesota Cities conference last week. She encouraged the City to consider using QR codes on future street improvement projects. Councilmember Holden asked if the Council would be interested in considering a sound wall near Glenhill at Snelling Avenue, near Johanna Marsh. Mayor Grant supported this matter being placed on a future work session agenda. Mayor Grant reported Ramsey County would be hosting an Open House on July 7 regarding the design of the trail on Lake Johanna Boulevard. The meeting will be held at City Hall. Mayor Grant commented he attended the State Farm ribbon cutting and grand opening. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2022 15 Mayor Grant indicated he received a notice from Ramsey County regarding the household hazardous waste events that would be held on Fridays and Saturdays in July. Mayor Grant reported staff tagged a number of trees along Highway 96 that are set to be removed. He asked staff to double check these trees to ensure they should be removed as some of the trees appeared to be healthy. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:22 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: July 25, 2022 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 11, 2022 5:15 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:15 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Steve Scott. Councilmember David Radziej arrived at 6:25 pm Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault, Finance Director Gayle Bauman, , City Clerk Julie Hanson, Lake Johanna Fire Department Assistant Chief Eric Nordeen, Deputy Chief/Emergency Manager Matt Sather and Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal Kris Rewald 1.AGENDA ITEMS A.Lake Johanna Fire Department Long Range Planning Discussion Deputy Chief Sather stated that Lake Johanna Fire covers approximately 31 square miles and 42,000 residents between the three cities that they contract services with, and have three stations. They responded to just over 4,000 calls last year and calls for service are on pace to surpass 6,000 calls by 2026. He noted that a staffing needs presentation was recently given to the Board of Directors. It was reported at that meeting that there were 580 times in 2021 where they had multiple calls going on at the same time, 113 times when there were three or more calls at the same time. They currently have a need to staff the third station on County Road I/Lexington where the administrative office is located, as there are no responding firefighters scheduled at that location. Deputy Chief Sather explained that day shifts are 6:30 am – noon, and noon – 5:00 pm, the evening shifts are 5:00 pm – 10:00 pm, and overnight from 10:00 pm – 6:30 am. Most daytime firefighters will work 2 shifts from 6:30 am – 5:00 pm. Some firefighters only work on the weekends. Deputy Chief Sather said in 2021 4.5% of the available shifts went unfilled, which translates to one or two positions left open for the day. March – May 2022 they averaged about 9% of shifts unfilled. Currently there are 5 full time positions and approximately 80 part time firefighters. The ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JUNE 20, 2022 2 office manager position handles HR, payroll, etc. and there is a need for additional help in that area. Deputy Chief Sather stated that four staffing options were presented to the Board of Directors, with Option #2 being the recommendation from the Fire Department: Option #1 - Hire 40-50 Additional Part-Time Firefighters Option #2 - Hire 6 Full-Time Captains/3 Full-Time Shift Commanders Option #3 - Transition to an All-Career Fire Department Option #4 - Maintain current model Further discussion ensued regarding specifics of the options. Deputy Chief Sather noted the Fire Board supported Option #2, which would need support from the member cities and be broken into phases. Option #2, Phase 1 includes applying for a SAFER grant through FEMA and hiring six full-time captains. Discussion continued regarding the SAFER grant, and how the grant would apply to staffing. Assistant Chief Nordeen explained the differences between Captains and other staff. Deputy Chief Sather stated that once they add nine additional full-time positions they won’t need part-time Lieutenant positions, but that could be years from now. He noted that the cities will have 30 days from the date of the grant being awarded to accept the award or lose the funding. Councilmember Holmes suggested that the fire department not come to all medical emergencies, and only go to life threatening ones. Deputy Chief Sather responded that often times when they get to a call the emergency is more severe than what the dispatcher classified it as based on the information the caller gave. Councilmember Holmes stated the City can’t afford the 14% increase. Councilmember Holden asked what happens if they are at a non-emergency call (Alpha) and they get a call for a medical emergency (Echo for example). She stated that according to the annual report 40% of the medical calls were A and B’s. Deputy Chief Sather said once they make patient contact they can’t leave until someone of equal or higher training gets there. If they don’t make patient contact they are free to leave and go to a different call. As soon as an ambulance comes they can leave. Assistant Chief Nordeen added they have a response agreement with Vadnais Heights and Roseville where if both of their crews are tied up on non-emergency calls and they get an emergency call, they can ask Roseville to take care of the more emergent call. Mayor Grant asked if a six-minute response is typical. Deputy Chief Sather said their average response time for Arden Hills is 5:54, the median time is 5:51. The new location will change the coverage area response time to be more equal and will get ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JUNE 20, 2022 3 them on the south side of the railroad tracks faster. The Board has never set an official target for response time. Councilmember Holden asked if there was anywhere in the budget they could cut back on like money spent on morale building activities. Deputy Chief Sather said things like that are also used for recruitment and retention. They have up to $300 reimbursement for gym memberships, a Christmas breakfast for staff and families, a steak fry once a year and an appreciation/awards dinner. Further discussion ensued regarding costs for the new fire station and staffing. Mayor Grant asked what other information they have about the FEMA grant. Deputy Chief Sather responded that it is competitive. Last year they distributed around $300 million in awards. This cycle there is approximately $200 million extra over last year due to additional COVID funding. He felt the chances of getting the grant this year are good. He and Chief Boehlke wrote the grant, and sent it out to others to review. City Administrator Perrault said the question for the City Council is, if they get the SAFER grant is the Council comfortable with them accepting it and hiring the additional six Captains. Deputy Chief Sather stated the fire department is looking for support from the City of Arden Hills to accept the grant if they are awarded it at the end of August/early September. Which also means they would be willing to support it after the three years and continue with the new staff. He felt the more pressing need was the additional staff versus the new building. Captains will provide direct support for the whole organization. Mayor Grant felt the Council would need to have additional discussion at a separate meeting. It was directed to bring back for discussion at the August work session. B. Noise Ordinance Discussion After a brief discussion it was decided to not update the City’s ordinance regarding noise. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES None. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the Special City Council Work Session at 6:47 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Jolene Trauba David Grant Deputy City Clerk Mayor Approved: July 25, 2022 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 11, 2022 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, David Radziej, and Steve Scott Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; City Planner Jessica Jagoe; Finance Director Gayle Bauman; and City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. The motion carried (5-0). 2.PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Mayor Grant commented he was made aware that anti-Semite literature was distributed in Arden Hills and several neighboring communities. He reported these actions were hateful and condemned by the City of Arden Hills. He explained such literature will not be tolerated by the City. He explained the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department was aware of this situation and would be investigating the matter further. Chris Hughes, 3515 Snelling Avenue North, discussed the need for affordable housing within TCAAP. He commented on the agreement that was previously considered and approved by the Council with Alatus. He stated he was pleased that this agreement included more affordable housing. He understood Ramsey County did not support the agreement between Alatus and the City because they would like to see more housing units and even more affordability. He reported the rejection was not unexpected. He stated when fully developed over 4,000 jobs will be created ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 11, 2022 2 within TCAAP and would create a $1 billion development. He encouraged the Council to take action and work with Ramsey County versus hoping this project would move forward because he wanted to witness the completion of the TCAAP project. His question to the City Council was “What are they doing today to work with Ramsey County?” Katy Muckala, 1147 Karth Lake, stated she would like the City Council to consider changing the residential pool barrier requirement. She requested the barrier height be changed from five feet to four feet. She noted this change would be in alignment with neighboring communities. She indicated the federal government recommends pool barriers be 48 inches. 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES A. Public Inquiry Response from June 27, 2022 City Council Meeting Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen provided the Council with a response to the public inquiry from the June 27, 2022 City Council meeting. He commented further on the improvements that were being made at Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E. He noted Ramsey County was currently reviewing the feedback that had been provided to the public and would be holding an in person open house in September or October of this year. 4. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director Swearingen reported paving of the northbound lanes of Lexington Avenue was completed. He noted northbound traffic would reopen mid-July. He encouraged residents to drive safely through the project area and to visit Ramsey County’s website for further information regarding this project. Public Works Director Swearingen stated work on Old Snelling continues and the first paving course was in place. He explained the multi-use trail was in place and would be open for use in the coming weeks. Public Works Director Swearingen explained the Arden Oaks Street Improvement Project would begin the week of July 18 and newsletters have been sent to residents regarding the project. B. Night to Unite City Clerk Hanson stated Night to Unite would be held on Tuesday, August 2. She encouraged residents that were looking to host an event to register with the City by Friday, July 15 in order to have a visit from the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 20, 2022, City Council Worksession ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 11, 2022 3 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to approve the June 20, 2022, City Council Worksession meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried (5-0). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-038 Regarding Application for Trident Development for Comprehensive Plan Amendments at 1700 West Highway 96 – Planning Case 22-009 C. Motion to Approve Payment No. 1 – Bituminous Roadways, Inc. – City Hall Parking Lot Project MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (5-0). 7. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 9. NEW BUSINESS None. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Radziej stated he attended the Lake Johanna Boulevard Trail open house’s walking/bicycle path display. He reported the path would be installed on the northwest side of the lake and would take five years to complete. Councilmember Scott thanked the community for turning out at the Lake Johanna Boulevard trail meeting. He appreciated the fact that the Council and many members from the community were in attendance. Councilmember Scott stated the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon would be hosting a family night on Wednesday, July 13 at the Hamline Readiness Center where remote control cars would be brought in for children to use. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 11, 2022 4 Councilmember Scott reported a penny carnival would be hosted by the City on Friday, July 22. Councilmember Holden asked what was going on with the parking issue at International Paper. City Administrator Perrault stated he received an email from International Paper earlier in the day and noted he had to review this further. Councilmember Holden asked that the tree fund be changed to a landscaping fund. City Administrator Perrault indicated staff would be discussing this further with the City Attorney. Councilmember Holden reported she picked up the anti-Semitic hate mail on Saturday that was thrown into her yard and the yards of her neighbors during the night. She said that in speaking with members of her neighborhood, there was agreement that this type of behavior is not acceptable. Councilmember Holden discussed issues on Sandeen Road, noting the roadway was too narrow when cars were parked on both sides of the street. Councilmember Holden, in response to a comment made during Public Inquiries portion of the meeting, explained the City Council was very surprised by the fact Ramsey County turned down the agreement between the City and Alatus. Mayor Grant stated he attended the Lake Johanna Boulevard presentation for the trail on the north side. He reported this trail would greatly improve pedestrian safety. Mayor Grant stated the City was in the midst of a drought and could benefit from purchasing watering bags for trees. Mayor Grant commented further on work that would be done by Ramsey County on two retaining walls that were deteriorating in the City. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Radziej seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:31 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor CONSENT ITEM 6A MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims and Payroll Listing Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: Claims and Payroll Listing All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Memo Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact N/A Attachments 2022 Payroll #15 $96,581.68 Total Payroll $96,581.68 Paid Claims - 06/30/2022-07/15/2022 (Check Nos. 51065-51117 and ACH Checks)$1,075,945.54 Total Accounts Payable $1,075,945.54 Total Claims $1,172,527.22 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 15 CHECKS DATED: 07/22/22 Biweekly: 07/02/22 - 07/15/22 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 7,640.64 EFT SIT 3,396.14 EFT FICA Oasdi 5,029.17 EFT FICA Medicare 1,176.17 EFT TOTAL TAXES 17,242.12 Health Premium 2,204.89 A/P Check* Dental Premium 278.34 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 50.00 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,533.23 HSA Health Saving 440.00 Health Care Savings Plan-Retirement 0.00 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-2% 0.00 EFT Health Care Savings Plan-4% 0.00 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 440.00 PERA 4,624.28 EFT ICMA 2,507.39 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 1,536.00 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 1,302.59 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 9,970.26 IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 0.00 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 24.00 A/P Check* Life/Addl/Dep Life 47.39 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 11.75 A/P Check* UNUM 19.51 A/P Check* AFLAC 22.76 EFT TOTAL VOLUNTARY 265.41 Total Employee Deductions 30,451.02 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 53,672.65 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 84,123.67 Plus City Paid Benefit 12,458.01 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 96,581.68 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 84,123.67 Less Total FSA 2,533.23 Less Total H.SA 440.00 Less Voluntary Ins 34.51 Net P/R Subject to FICA 81,115.93 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 5,029.17 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,176.17 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,335.69 434.40 5,770.09 482.58 0.00 6,205.34 533.15 (50.57) CITY BENEFIT 5,029.17 1,176.17 Accounts Payable User: Printed: gayle.bauman 7/19/2022 11:34 AM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription ACH001 US BANK 06/30/2022ACH BAARS62022 FLEET FARM 2700 - clothing allowance 172.95 BAUMG62022 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - ACFR award program 460.00 BAUMG62022 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - PAFR award program 250.00 CHRIM62022 THE HOME DEPOT #2828 - park supplies 26.20 CHRIM62022 METAL SUPERMARKETS ROSEVI - park supplies 24.04 FRIDJ62022 USPS PO 2683440014 - tree letter postage 369.00 FRIDJ62022 AMZN MKTP US*1L3QL6WZ2 AM - cell phone case 21.99 HANSJ62022 JIMMY JOHNS - 1532 - E - work session 168.56 HANSJ62022 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES - clerks academy JH 140.00 HANSJ62022 GPS*MUNICIPAL CLERKS AND - MCFOA dues JT 51.48 HANSJ62022 MIKES PRO SHOP - EE recognition award 30.00 HANSJ62022 SP SCHWAAB INC - notary stamp AL 32.44 HANSJ62022 GPS*MUNICIPAL CLERKS AND - MCFOA dues JH 51.48 MIKAT62022 APPLE.COM/BILL - iCloud 0.99 PERRD62022 FERGUSON ENT #525 - toilet repairs 153.80 PERRD62022 ID ENHANCEMENTS INC. - key fobs 285.56 REBATE62022 US BANK REBATE -347.92 VAUGJ62022 BCS*MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC SC - facility rental 92.00 VAUGJ62022 OFFICESUPPLY.COM - supplies for Perry Park 177.46 VAUGJ62022 OFFICE DEPOT #375 - playground supplies 145.30 VAUGJ62022 KIRBY BUILT PRODUCTS - Webb bench plaque 217.60 VAUGJ62022 KIRBY BUILT PRODUCTS - Messerly bench plaque 217.81 VAUGJ62022 BSN SPORTS LLC - youth t-ball/baseball equipment 539.62 VAUGJ62022 DOMINO'S 1971 - training 51.21 VAUGJ62022 MN ZOO CASH ROOM - field trip 210.00 3,541.57Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH001: ACH002 AFLAC 06/30/2022ACH 759128 Insurance Premiums- June 2022 45.52 45.52Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH002: ACH005 MINNESOTA REVENUE-SALES & USE TAX06/30/2022ACH 52022 May Sales/Use Tax 59.76 52022 May Sales/Use Tax 0.24 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH005: 3,647.09Total for 6/30/2022: Report Total (3 checks): 3,647.09 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:34 AM) Accounts Payable User: Printed: gayle.bauman 7/19/2022 11:35 AM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0189 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 07/08/2022ACH 2060186 June Locates 100.80 2060186 June Locates 100.80 2060186 June Locates 100.80 302.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0192 GRAINGER INC 07/08/2022ACH 9352908488 Line Marking Paint 72.72 9363996068 Tape 3.10 75.82Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0243 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL-WASTE WATER07/08/2022ACH 0001142604 Waste Water-August 68,098.24 68,098.24Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0243: 0285 XCEL ENERGY 07/08/2022ACH 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 540.54 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 272.73 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 60.58 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 2,498.44 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 1,394.43 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 1,776.01 785709130 5/16/22-6/15/22 2,090.67 8,633.40Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0292 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC 07/08/2022ACH 0003526936 June Rental 30.24 30.24Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 07/08/2022ACH 0231025 IT Support - July 7,535.16 7,535.16Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 0327 STAPLES INC 07/08/2022ACH 3510277483 Supplies 105.41 3510277483 Supplies 96.87 3510277484 Supplies 117.45 3510277485 Supplies 54.17 3510277486 Supplies 18.98 3510277487 Supplies 3.79 3510352633 Supplies 36.00 3510759043 Supplies 20.17 3510886894 Supplies -117.45 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 335.39Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0382 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 106944 07/08/2022ACH PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee Percent 401PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee Percent 401 376.48 PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employer Percent 401PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employer Percent 401 434.40 810.88Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0382: 0387 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST #302482 07/08/2022ACH PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee Percent 216.11 PR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.07.2022 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,924.54 2,140.65Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0453 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP 07/08/2022ACH 0036699 Graffiti-Gone 496.00 496.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0453: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 07/08/2022ACH M1510 6/27 Council Minutes 310.00 310.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 10476 TWIN CITIES COMMERCIAL CLEANERS07/08/2022ACH 0722T122 Janitorial Services-June 2,005.58 2,005.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10476: 10502 ZAIRA MUNOZ 07/08/2022ACH 063022 Mileage Reimbursement 18.96 18.96Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10502: 10506 KAYLEE NELSON 07/08/2022ACH 070522 Seasonal Staff Clothing Allowance-KN 116.00 116.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10506: 4286 STEVE SCOTT 07/08/2022ACH 070122 LMC Conference Mileage Reimbursement 169.66 169.66Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4286: 5493 JOLENE TRAUBA 07/08/2022ACH 063022 Mileage Reimbursement 70.95 70.95Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5493: 6009 ZIEGLER INC 07/08/2022ACH IN000591166 2022 Street Paving-rental 6/13-6/23 8,320.00 8,320.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6009: 6813 BRITT PEASE 07/08/2022ACH 062722 Granite Cleaner Reimbursement 6.10 6.10Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6813: 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 07/08/2022ACH 1222-5998 May Drinking Water Survey 992.50 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 992.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: 8800 VALLEY PAVING INC 07/08/2022ACH 15209 2022 Street Maintenance-milling 15,550.00 15,550.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8800: alpi ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 07/08/2022ACH 070722 Postage-July Newsletter 1,117.16 166307 Business Cards-DG, JH, & DP 162.65 1,279.81Total for this ACH Check for Vendor alpi: fptc FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY INC 07/08/2022ACH 27707 Footage Counter 312.00 312.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor fptc: ToII TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 07/08/2022ACH 070122 June Electrical Inspections 3,237.60 3,237.60Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ToII: advs ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC 07/08/202251065 00052700 Speed Limit Signs 217.35 217.35Total for Check Number 51065: 1053 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY INC 07/08/202251066 8209 Road Oil-2022 Paving Project 432.25 432.25Total for Check Number 51066: 5593 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORP 07/08/202251067 17822 Internet Supplement Pages 36.00 18074 Internet Supplement Pages 22.50 58.50Total for Check Number 51067: 6842 BELSON OUTDOORS LLC 07/08/202251068 WQ 309930 SLP Lions Picnic Table Donations 13,307.48 13,307.48Total for Check Number 51068: UB*00469 TREVOR or KATIE BOEHNE 07/08/202251069 Refund Check 011047-000, 4397 Arden View Court 8.44 8.44Total for Check Number 51069: 10483 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 07/08/202251070 401333.0622 June Apprenticeship Fund 256.00 256.00Total for Check Number 51070: cpf1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 07/08/202251071 184503.0622 June Pension 3,072.00 3,072.00Total for Check Number 51071: 1033 COMCAST 07/08/202251072 101030.0722 Service 07/03-08/02 108.35 98681.0722 Service 07/05-08/04 111.32 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 219.67Total for Check Number 51072: 1032 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO INC 07/08/202251073 220615 2022 Street Restoration Project 19,851.37 19,851.37Total for Check Number 51073: 0849 FRA-DOR BLACK DIRT & RECYCLE 07/08/202251074 2206014 Black Dirt 76.00 76.00Total for Check Number 51074: UB*00513 TIAN HE 07/08/202251075 Refund Check 006806-000, 4519 Royal Hills Drive 11.23 11.23Total for Check Number 51075: UB*00566 JON HELLE 07/08/202251076 Refund Check 012649-000, 4529 Lakeshore Place 97.64 97.64Total for Check Number 51076: 4999 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC 07/08/202251077 0015795-IN Field Striping Paint 1,449.00 06261464 Paint-Perry Park 578.42 2,027.42Total for Check Number 51077: 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSURANCE07/08/202251078 BP3.0822 August Insurance 10,760.00 NB4.0822 August Insurance 1,527.00 12,287.00Total for Check Number 51078: 0390 INT'L UNION OPERATING ENGINEERS-UNION DUES07/08/202251079 1200.0722 July Dues 280.00 280.00Total for Check Number 51079: UB*00567 MARK JENSEN 07/08/202251080 Refund Check 000161-000, 1245 Amble Road 12.55 12.55Total for Check Number 51080: 10330 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 07/08/202251081 54471 2022 Street Maintenance curb & gutter 18,291.00 18,291.00Total for Check Number 51081: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC07/08/202251082 839 2022 2nd Half Payment 348,337.35 348,337.35Total for Check Number 51082: UB*00479 BONNIE LAMBRECHT 07/08/202251083 Refund Check 002525-000, 3244 New Brighton Road 1.82 1.82Total for Check Number 51083: 10362 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 07/08/202251084 INV10079680 Copier 6/25-7/24 & Q2 Usage 93.73 INV10079680 Copier 6/25-7/24 & Q2 Usage 531.14 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 624.87Total for Check Number 51084: 10448 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 07/08/202251085 476224407 Copier Contract 6/25-7/25 200.35 476224407 Copier Contract 6/25-7/25 35.36 235.71Total for Check Number 51085: 5443 METRO PRODUCTS INC 07/08/202251086 167408 Supplies 385.55 385.55Total for Check Number 51086: 1058 MIDC ENTERPRISES INC 07/08/202251087 I0048695 City Hall Pipe 12.69 I0048715 City Hall Irrigation Supplies 124.60 137.29Total for Check Number 51087: 10486 MINNESOTA METRO NORTH TOURISM BUREAU07/08/202251088 070622 Quality Inn May Lodging Tax 3,040.95 3,040.95Total for Check Number 51088: 3100 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS CO07/08/202251089 9672443.0622 June Premium 39.02 39.02Total for Check Number 51089: UB*00476 JACLYN or MICHAEL QUACKENBUSH 07/08/202251090 Refund Check 008252-000, 1695 Valentine Avenue 12.30 12.30Total for Check Number 51090: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 07/08/202251091 FLEET-000733 Equip Parts & Services-May 2022 542.24 FLEET-000733 Equip Parts & Services-May 2022 3,030.70 PRRRV-001889 3rd Qtr Election Services 6,850.00 SHRFL-002076 Law Enforcement-July 2022 116,177.07 126,600.01Total for Check Number 51091: 0282 REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 07/08/202251092 0899-003947231 May Revenue Share -3,187.02 0899-003947231 June Recycling 8,534.50 0899-003950536 PW June Waste 2,035.52 7,383.00Total for Check Number 51092: 6225 SAND CREEK EAP LLC 07/08/202251093 SDC3009-IN EAP Annual Contract 7/2022-6/2023 2,400.00 2,400.00Total for Check Number 51093: 10505 SNAKE DISCOVERY LLC 07/08/202251094 8051 6/21 Reptile Program 200.00 200.00Total for Check Number 51094: 10495 TENET 07/08/202251095 715998 Marking Paint 127.92 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 127.92Total for Check Number 51095: 1161 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 07/08/202251096 30913 Water Break-3737 Lexington Ave 8,886.55 8,886.55Total for Check Number 51096: 689,765.58Total for 7/8/2022: 0320 HEALTH PARTNERS INC 07/15/2022ACH 114015561 August Insurance 1,016.16 1,016.16Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0327 STAPLES INC 07/15/2022ACH 3511247754 Supplies 21.98 3511247754 Supplies 109.23 3511247757 Supplies 20.66 3511247758 Supplies 122.45 274.32Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0453 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP 07/15/2022ACH 0036831 Cleaning supplies 236.00 236.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0453: 0922 NINENORTH 07/15/2022ACH 2022-114 June Production 1,018.83 1,018.83Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 1115 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 07/15/2022ACH R-019823-000-1 2022 DataLink Subscription 3,600.00 3,600.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1115: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 07/15/2022ACH 0291984 2021 PMP Hazelnut Park/Glenpaul 1,713.00 0291985 2022 PMP Snelling Ave N 39,164.00 0292242 Lift Station 10 Rehab 2,622.50 43,499.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 4889 COMMUNITY FOOTWORKS 07/15/2022ACH 07062022 July Foot Care Clinic 296.00 296.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 5587 CES IMAGING INC 07/15/2022ACH INV141749 July Rental 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 07/15/2022ACH 0001361500 Restrooms 7/9-8/5 682.00 682.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025: 7501 KELLY & LEMMONS PA 07/15/2022ACH Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 58506 June Prosecution 3,992.00 3,992.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 07/15/2022ACH 1222-6091 June Drinking Water Survey 952.50 952.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: 8870 CHET'S SHOES INC 07/15/2022ACH 60074 Seasonal Staff Clothing Allowance-JM & MG 250.00 250.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8870: a1hy A-1 HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE INC07/15/2022ACH 0127670-IN Jet Vac #85321 Supplies 500.39 0127709-IN Jet Vac #85321 Hose 895.85 1,396.24Total for this ACH Check for Vendor a1hy: bond BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 07/15/2022ACH 70929 Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A 4,425.00 70929 Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A 28,475.00 32,900.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor bond: fptc FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY INC 07/15/2022ACH 27732 Hydo-Ex Spray Gun 328.50 328.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor fptc: holdb BRENDA HOLDEN 07/15/2022ACH 06242022 Mileage LMC conference 185.45 185.45Total for this ACH Check for Vendor holdb: 2597 AARP 07/15/202251097 7122022 July AARP Driver Safety Class 130.00 130.00Total for Check Number 51097: advs ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC 07/15/202251098 00053013 Galvanized Channel Posts 398.40 398.40Total for Check Number 51098: UB*00569 BEVERLY APLIKOWSKI 07/15/202251099 Refund Check 002573-000, 1443 Bussard Court 38.14 38.14Total for Check Number 51099: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 07/15/202251100 605847 Supplies 47.27 607639 Rakes 139.96 187.23Total for Check Number 51100: 10347 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 07/15/202251101 31459 City Hall Parking Lot Improvements 189,945.78 31459 City Hall Parking Lot Improvements -9,497.29 180,448.49Total for Check Number 51101: Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 10244 COMCAST BUSINESS INC 07/15/202251102 150187550 July Service 494.05 494.05Total for Check Number 51102: 1032 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO INC 07/15/202251103 220630 2022 PW Parking Project 69,097.72 69,097.72Total for Check Number 51103: 0849 FRA-DOR BLACK DIRT & RECYCLE 07/15/202251104 2206161 Mulch & Black Dirt 1,045.60 1,045.60Total for Check Number 51104: UB*00568 BRIAN or ELAINE HOLSTINE 07/15/202251105 Refund Check 000765-000, 1449 Colleen Avenue 34.38 34.38Total for Check Number 51105: 1058 MIDC ENTERPRISES INC 07/15/202251106 I0048800 Valve Box & Wire Splice 106.28 I0048825 Pro Sport Rotor 449.52 I0048836 Supplies 904.96 1,460.76Total for Check Number 51106: 10486 MINNESOTA METRO NORTH TOURISM BUREAU07/15/202251107 071222 SpringHill Suites June Lodging Tax 9,834.80 9,834.80Total for Check Number 51107: 10271 MN PEIP 07/15/202251108 1209634 August Insurance 14,484.78 14,484.78Total for Check Number 51108: 1208 PREMIUM WATERS INC 07/15/202251109 610207-06-22 Water June 46.46 613317-06-22 Water June 61.48 107.94Total for Check Number 51109: UB*00572 HAIXIA QIN 07/15/202251110 Refund Check 012531-000, 1305 Nursery Hill Lane 27.29 27.29Total for Check Number 51110: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 07/15/202251111 EMCOM-010146 Fleet Support-June 24.96 EMCOM-010182 911 Dispatch Services-June 2022 4,418.27 EMCOM-010199 CAD Services-June 2022 732.41 PRK-002049 Q2 2022 Inspections 2,701.70 PRK-002049 Q2 2022 Inspections -0.03 PRRRV-001914 2021 Audit Reports 295.00 8,172.31Total for Check Number 51111: UB*00570 THERESE ROTHMUND 07/15/202251112 Refund Check 002694-000, 1151 Carlton Drive 217.00 217.00Total for Check Number 51112: Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 10217 SONIC WINDOW WASHING LLC 07/15/202251113 6218 Window washing final payment 2,049.50 2,049.50Total for Check Number 51113: 10354 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS 07/15/202251114 622572589 PC 22-009 #650 2040 comp plan amend 49.35 622572589 2022-002 Food Trucks 40.89 622572589 PC 22-011 zoning code amend 101.99 622572589 2022-003 Amend fee schedule 35.25 622572589 PC 22-012 #656 3737 Lexington Launch Prop 52.64 622572589 Delinquent utilities 29.14 622572589 PC 22-008 #565 4073 Valentine Ct variance 36.19 622572589 Summary Financials 690.90 1,036.35Total for Check Number 51114: UB*00571 SANDRA RAE STRATHE 07/15/202251115 Refund Check 012558-000, 4395 Arden View Court 36.83 36.83Total for Check Number 51115: 9755 VERIZON CONNECT NWF INC 07/15/202251116 OSV000002806084 June Service 323.80 323.80Total for Check Number 51116: WECT TOM WEKO 07/15/202251117 07142022 MV Volleyball Camp 2,220.00 2,220.00Total for Check Number 51117: 382,532.87Total for 7/15/2022: Report Total (92 checks): 1,072,298.45 Page 9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (7/19/2022 11:35 AM) CONSENT ITEM – 6B MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director SUBJECT: 2022 2nd Quarter Financials Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Quarterly budget to actual fund statements and investment portfolio detail for the City. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background Investments - per the Investment Policy, our Benchmark Rate is the 4M plus Rate. At June 30, 2022 – this rate was 0.944% and our portfolio is averaging 1.76%. All of our investments are in government secured or government backed deposits. Utility billing cycles and CIP projects are taken into account when determining how much to invest and for how long. Basis of accounting – during the year, City books are kept on a cash basis which means that only items that are received are booked as revenue and items paid are booked as expenses. Adjustments for accruals, deferrals and other accounting requirements are made at year end. General Fund – The main source of revenue for the City is property taxes and these come in twice a year. Expenditures are at 44.6% of budget through the second quarter, compared to 41.4% last year. Other governmental funds, enterprise funds and internal service funds – Utility revenue for second quarter will be booked in July 2022 and annual transfers between funds will be booked later in the year. The allocation for insurance (Risk Management Fund) was completed in June. Market value adjustments for investments total -$555,493.36 through the end of the quarter. It is important to note that the City holds its investments to maturity and no principal is ever lost on an investment. Discussion City Staff respectfully request the City Council review the quarterly updates for further discussion. Budget Impact None. Attachments Attachment A: Investment Portfolio Analysis Attachment B: General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Summary Attachment C: Other City Funds Revenues and Expenditures Summary Attachment D: Permit Data CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTSFOR THE MONTH ENDING JUNE 30, 2022Institution Description TypeWells Fargo - AdvWells Fargo Advisors Money MarketWells Fargo - AdvFHLB Municipal SecuritiesWells Fargo - AdvFHLB Municipal SecuritiesRBCRBC Money MarketRBCRaymond James Bank Brokered CDRBCSallie Mae Bk Brokered CDRBCNew York NY Taxable GO Bds Municipal SecuritiesRBCWells Fargo Bk Brokered CDRBCUS Treasury Note Municipal SecuritiesRBCCity of NY, NY Tax GO Municipal SecuritiesRBCJP Morgan Chase Brokered CDRBCUS Treasury Note Municipal SecuritiesRBCUS Treasury Note Municipal SecuritiesRBCCitibank Nat'l Assoc Brokered CDRBCUS Treasury Note Municipal SecuritiesRBCCapital One Natl Assn McLean VABrokered CDRBCBank of the West Instl Brokered CDRBCMorgan Stanley Private Bank Brokered CDRBCPrescott Wis Sch Dist Municipal SecuritiesRBCAmerican Express Brokered CDRBCState of Connecticut Municipal SecuritiesRBCCapital One Bk USA Brokered CDRBCMorgan Stanley Bk NA Brokered CDRBCEnerbank USA UT Brokered CDRBCState of Mississippi Municipal SecuritiesRBCNew Jersy St Econ Dev Municipal SecuritiesRBCFFCB Municipal SecuritiesRBCFHLB Municipal SecuritiesRBCSan Marcos Tex Cons Municipal SecuritiesRBCGladewater Cnty Line Ind TX Municipal SecuritiesRBCYucaipa VY Calif Municipal SecuritiesRBCNew York City NY Transit Municipal SecuritiesRBCPark Creek Co Met Dist CO Municipal SecuritiesRBCPalm Beach Fla Rev Municipal SecuritiesRBCFHLB Municipal SecuritiesRBC WEALTHMichigan City ISD Municipal SecuritiesRBCSkokie IL Municipal SecuritiesRBC WEALTHHawaii St GO Bds Municipal SecuritiesRBCFHLB Municipal SecuritiesRBCFFCB Municipal SecuritiesRBCFHLB Municipal SecuritiesRBCMHFA Municipal SecuritiesRBCNew York, NY Municipal SecuritiesRBCVista Calif Uni Sch Dist Municipal SecuritiesRBCSan Francisco CA Municipal SecuritiesRBCSan Diego CA Comm College Municipal SecuritiesRBCCook County IL Sch Dist Municipal SecuritiesAffinity PlusMembership Savings Money MarketAffinity Plus60 Mo CD Brokered CDAffinity Plus60 Mo CD Brokered CDPMA4M General Money MarketPMA4MP General Money MarketPMA4M Payroll Money MarketPMAARPA Funds Municipal SecuritiesTotal cash and investmentsUnadjustedMarket Value Deposits - Expenditures - Market Value Market Value Unrealized1/1/2022 Purchases Sales Transfers Interest 6/30/2022 6/30/2022 gain / loss647.79$ -$ -$ -$ 2,224.57$ 2,872.36$ 2,872.36$ -$ 237,926.85 - - - - 237,926.85 223,709.50 (14,217.35) 454,682.40 - - - - 454,682.40 427,202.00 (27,480.40) 693,257.04 - - - 2,224.57 695,481.61 653,783.86 (41,697.75) - 245,000.00 (327,342.05) - 82,342.05 - - - 246,460.02 - (246,000.00) - - 460.02 - (460.02) 248,165.84 - (247,000.00) - - 1,165.84 - (1,165.84) 352,513.00 - - - - 352,513.00 349,888.00 (2,625.00) 252,227.04 - - - - 252,227.04 249,149.40 (3,077.64) - 249,256.29 - - - 249,256.29 248,960.00 (296.29) 460,737.00 - - - - 460,737.00 450,904.50 (9,832.50) 230,329.60 - - - - 230,329.60 227,522.40 (2,807.20) - 248,377.08 - - - 248,377.08 247,050.00 (1,327.08) - 246,628.70 - - - 246,628.70 245,127.50 (1,501.20) 253,151.22 - - - - 253,151.22 246,555.96 (6,595.26) - 249,626.49 - - - 249,626.49 247,557.50 (2,068.99) 102,887.00 - - - - 102,887.00 99,884.00 (3,003.00) 98,750.00 - - - - 98,750.00 98,020.00 (730.00) 253,056.44 - - - - 253,056.44 242,936.85 (10,119.59) 233,460.75 - - - - 233,460.75 225,574.15 (7,886.60) - 245,000.00 - - - 245,000.00 238,779.45 (6,220.55) - 366,948.75 - - - 366,948.75 354,588.75 (12,360.00) 104,506.00 - - - - 104,506.00 98,893.00 (5,613.00) 155,406.00 - - - - 155,406.00 146,632.50 (8,773.50) 256,265.82 - - - - 256,265.82 240,987.18 (15,278.64) 421,608.00 - - - - 421,608.00 397,412.00 (24,196.00) 331,457.00 - - - - 331,457.00 317,852.50 (13,604.50) 294,423.00 - - - - 294,423.00 279,963.00 (14,460.00) 396,076.00 - - - - 396,076.00 377,888.00 (18,188.00) 236,255.00 - - - - 236,255.00 223,735.00 (12,520.00) 236,330.00 - - - - 236,330.00 223,600.00 (12,730.00) - 200,000.00 - - - 200,000.00 191,220.00 (8,780.00) 411,792.00 - - - - 411,792.00 384,188.00 (27,604.00) 314,592.00 - - - - 314,592.00 291,432.00 (23,160.00) 407,214.60 - - - - 407,214.60 379,688.40 (27,526.20) - 299,262.50 - - - 299,262.50 287,406.00 (11,856.50) 264,965.00 - - - - 264,965.00 254,362.50 (10,602.50) - 288,813.87 - - - 288,813.87 267,986.10 (20,827.77) 415,688.00 - - - - 415,688.00 377,496.00 (38,192.00) - 402,400.00 - - - 402,400.00 397,548.00 (4,852.00) 294,678.00 - - - - 294,678.00 273,525.00 (21,153.00) - 300,000.00 - - - 300,000.00 298,359.00 (1,641.00) - 230,385.38 - - - 230,385.38 215,174.20 (15,211.18) 391,268.00 - - - - 391,268.00 353,024.00 (38,244.00) 293,010.00 - - - - 293,010.00 265,617.00 (27,393.00) 342,342.00 - - - - 342,342.00 309,403.50 (32,938.50) - 323,202.43 - - - 323,202.43 324,040.50 838.07 - 142,353.63 - - - 142,353.63 135,142.00 (7,211.63) 8,299,614.33 4,037,255.12 (820,342.05) - 82,342.05 11,598,869.45 11,085,073.84 (513,795.61) 10.00 - - - - 10.00 10.00 - 112,143.13 - - - 1,106.73 113,249.86 113,249.86 - 288,520.19 - - - 2,847.38 291,367.57 291,367.57 - 400,673.32 - - - 3,954.11 404,627.43 404,627.43 - 2,186,059.58 7,774,437.52 (11,120,788.29) 1,322,781.00 841.58 163,331.39 163,331.39 (0.00) 6,124,182.79 - - (800,000.00) 8,095.51 5,332,278.30 5,332,278.30 - 0.00 686,207.98 (686,207.98) - - - 0.00 0.00 561,788.96 - - (522,781.00) 554.79 39,562.75 39,562.75 - 8,872,031.33 8,460,645.50 (11,806,996.27) - 9,491.88 5,535,172.44 5,535,172.44 (0.00) 18,265,576.02$ 12,497,900.62$ (12,627,338.32)$ -$ 98,012.61$ 18,234,150.93$ 17,678,657.57$ (555,493.36)$ CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTSFOR THE MONTH ENDING JUNE 30, 2022UnadjustedMarket Value Market Value VarianceMaturity 6/30/2022 6/30/2022 6/30/2022Current 5,539,680.66$ 5,538,054.80$ (1,625.86)$ < 1 year 3,149,100.85 3,115,236.69 (33,864.16) 1-2 years 1,202,971.94 1,160,772.20 (42,199.74) 2-3 years 1,855,235.82 1,760,735.18 (94,500.64) 3-4 years 2,343,372.95 2,204,978.90 (138,394.05) 5+ years 4,143,788.71 3,898,879.80 (244,908.91) 18,234,150.93$ 17,678,657.57$ (555,493.36)$ Weighted average Rate of return 1.76% 6/30/2022Average Maturity (years) 0.99 6/30/2022Market Value Investment Type 6/30/2022Money Market 5,498,492.05$ Brokered CD 2,293,978.17 Comml Paper - Municipal Securities 9,886,187.35 Checking - 17,678,657.57$ $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000Current < 1 year 1-2years2-3years3-4years5+ yearsMaturities31%13%0%56%0%Money MarketBrokered CDComml PaperMunicipal SecuritiesChecking ATTACHMENT B YTD YTD YTD Annual Through % of Through Budget 6/30/2022 Budget 6/30/2021 REVENUES Taxes 3,858,370$ 1,785,330$ 46.3% 1,698,000$ Licenses and permits 504,800 504,675 100.0%193,942 Intergovernmental 158,250 54,757 34.6%48,448 Charges for services 519,510 337,490 65.0%263,544 Fines and forfeits 23,750 7,595 32.0%7,276 Special assessments 1,510 ‐ 0.0%‐ Investment earnings 19,500 12,930 66.3%(9,308) Miscellaneous 13,820 6,486 46.9%444 TOTAL REVENUES 5,099,510 2,709,264 53.13% 2,202,344 EXPENDITURES Mayor & Council 55,070 24,073 43.7%50,309 Administration 402,450 195,023 48.5%175,955 Elections 32,350 18,888 58.4%10,644 Finance 184,220 104,973 57.0% 98,139 TCAAP 87,260 23,347 26.8%13,885 Planning & Zoning 242,010 98,778 40.8%69,382 Government Buildings 203,840 98,507 48.3%58,068 Public Safety 1,396,130 698,501 50.0% 694,418 Dispatch 61,810 25,753 41.7%22,618 Fire Protection 696,670 348,337 50.0%328,200 Emergency Management 6,200 3,190 51.4%2,718 Protective Inspections 349,860 147,515 42.2%146,291 Street Maintenance 759,040 220,066 29.0%220,714 Recreation 234,740 93,365 39.8%55,203 Park Maintenance 529,240 238,116 45.0%212,227 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,240,890 2,338,433 44.62% 2,158,771 EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)(141,380) 370,831 ‐262.3%43,573 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) EDA Fund transfers ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ Equipment Fund transfers ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ Public Safety Capital Fund transfers ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ PIR Fund transfers ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)‐ ‐ N/A ‐ NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (141,380)$ 370,831$ ‐262.29%43,573$ Tax revenues are collected twice a year. Mayor & Council ‐ no payment for NYFS in 2022. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 Licenses and permits/Charges for services ‐ big permits issued include 4200 Round Lake, 3787 Lexington and Boston Scientific. Investment earnings ‐ Market value adjustments will not be booked until the end of the year. The amount through 6/30/22 is ‐$555,493.36. Government Buildings ‐ timing difference. 1st half PW facility costs are included in 2022 but not in 2021. ATTACHMENT C BEGINNING NET FUND FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES CHANGE Cable TV Budget 90,743 98,840 129,810 (30,970) Actual 23,842 56,762 (32,921) % of Budget 24.1%43.7% EDA General Budget 657,906 102,850 87,270 15,580 Actual 5,562 36,379 (30,817) % of Budget 5.4%41.7% EDA Revolving Budget ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Actual ‐ ‐ ‐ % of Budget N/A N/A TIF 3 Cottage Villas Budget 807,487 3,600 1,900 1,700 Actual 2,670 ‐ 2,670 % of Budget 74.2%0.0% TIF 4 Pres Homes Budget 322,070 378,680 284,780 93,900 Actual 861 ‐ 861 % of Budget 0.2%0.0% TIF 5 TCAAP Budget (22,047) ‐ 1,900 (1,900) Actual ‐ ‐ ‐ % of Budget N/A 0.0% Equipment & Building Budget 261,892 379,000 490,380 (111,380) Actual 26,174 53,764 (27,590) % of Budget 6.9%11.0% Park Budget 565,168 1,100 315,000 (313,900) Actual 13,282 2,122 11,159 % of Budget 1207.4%0.7% PIR Budget 4,990,123 1,492,170 2,968,110 (1,475,940) Actual 273,458 564,394 (290,936) % of Budget 18.3%19.0% Public Safety Capital Equipment Budget 173,067 200,550 230,130 (29,580) Actual 14,381 (429) 14,810 % of Budget 7.2%‐0.2% TCAAP Budget (194,879) ‐ ‐ ‐ Actual ‐ ‐ ‐ % of Budget N/A N/A Cable TV ‐ Franchise revenue are receipted quarterly in the month following the end of the quarter. EDA General Fund ‐ tax revenues are collected twice a year. Transfers in to the Equipment & Building fund are normally completed during the 4th quarter. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 BEGINNING NET FUND CASH BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES CHANGE Water Budget 1,844,097 3,031,590 3,357,590 (326,000) Actual 555,793 735,613 (179,820) % of Budget 18.3% 21.9% Sanitary Sewer Budget 743,125 2,191,220 2,147,350 43,870 Actual 551,890 1,092,203 (540,313) % of Budget 25.2% 50.9% Recycling Budget 185,202 180,170 177,390 2,780 Actual 11,738 83,025 (71,287) % of Budget 6.5% 46.8% Surface Water Management Budget 44,508 930,450 905,970 24,480 Actual 237,648 178,312 59,336 % of Budget 25.5% 19.7% Risk Management Budget 163,793 163,480 181,130 (17,650) Actual 147,582 140,780 6,802 % of Budget 90.3% 77.7% Engineering Budget ‐ 35,670 35,670 ‐ Actual 23,255 23,255 ‐ % of Budget 65.2% 65.2% Central Garage Budget ‐ 246,580 246,580 ‐ Actual 87,165 87,165 ‐ % of Budget 35.3% 35.3% Technology Budget 4,506 190,550 185,000 5,550 Actual 88,456 88,467 (10) % of Budget 46.4% 47.8% Utility revenues are receipted quarterly in the month following the end of the quarter. Recycling ‐ 1st half recycling revenue is booked in July with the property tax receipts and the 2nd half is booked in December. Risk Mgmt ‐ Property and Work Comp insurance is booked for the year. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance ‐Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 06/30/21 06/30/22 (Unfavorable) 06/30/22 REVENUES User charges 2,479,490$ 490,228$ 516,605$ 26,377$ 105.4 % Connection charges 13,750 3,940 3,605 (335) 91.5 Other 531,950 19,932 25,811 5,879 129.5 Interest earnings 6,400 (2,544) 9,772 12,316 ‐384.1 TOTAL REVENUES 3,031,590 511,556 555,793 44,237 108.6 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 400,590 163,530 173,778 (10,248) 106.3 Supplies and materials 59,500 10,694 23,471 (12,777) 219.5 Other services and charges 306,190 134,515 111,508 23,007 82.9 Water purchases 1,134,000 185,826 204,581 (18,755) 110.1 Depreciation 365,450 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Capital expenses 741,110 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Debt service 250,750 215,875 222,275 (6,400) 103.0 TOTAL EXPENSES 3,257,590 710,440 735,613 (25,173) 103.5 Bond Proceeds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Transfers out 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES (326,000)$ (198,884)$ (179,820)$ 19,064$ 90.4 % WATER FUND CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2020 ‐445,511.54 971,676.06 2,268,875.28 2021 ‐490,227.97 1,243,040.31 2,747,032.72 2022 1,609.48 516,604.60 $‐ $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 MillionsWater Sales Comparison Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance ‐Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 06/30/21 06/30/22 (Unfavorable) 06/30/22 REVENUES User charges 2,171,780$ 518,241$ 544,045$ 25,804$ 105.0 % Connection charges 8,250 1,665 2,490 825 149.5 Other 7,990 1,836 2,214 378 120.6 Interest earnings 3,200 (1,247) 3,141 4,387 ‐251.9 TOTAL REVENUES 2,191,220 520,495 551,890 31,395 106.0 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 474,950 194,947 208,459 (13,512) 106.9 Supplies and materials 16,500 2,547 9,175 (6,628) 360.2 Other services and charges 314,460 149,574 160,396 (10,822) 107.2 Wastewater charges 817,180 494,176 476,688 17,488 96.5 Depreciation 194,430 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Capital expenses 164,380 43,886 202,461 (158,575) 461.3 Debt service 39,450 35,625 35,025 600 98.3 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,021,350 920,755 1,092,203 (171,448) 118.6 Bond Proceeds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Transfers out 126,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES 43,870$ (400,260)$ (540,313)$ (140,053)$ 135.0 % CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 SEWER FUND Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2020 533.31 466,578.34 910,516.36 1,864,971.38 2021 171.53 518,240.72 1,050,881.97 2,104,021.86 2022 702.03 544,045.08 $‐ $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 MillionsSewer Sales Comparison Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance ‐Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 06/30/21 06/30/22 (Unfavorable) 06/30/22 REVENUES User charges 929,000$ 225,409$ 236,370$ 10,960$ 104.9 % Other ‐ 4 ‐ (4) 0.0 Interest earnings 1,450 (401) 1,279 1,679 ‐319.2 TOTAL REVENUES 930,450 225,013 237,648 12,635 105.6 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 277,630 113,560 122,519 (8,959) 107.9 Supplies and materials 9,800 1,406 1,445 (39) 102.7 Other services and charges 227,430 58,693 54,348 4,344 92.6 Depreciation 145,010 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A Capital expenses 172,100 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A TOTAL EXPENSES 831,970 173,659 178,312 (4,653) 102.7 Transfers out 74,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES 24,480$ 51,355$ 59,336$ 7,981$ 115.5 % CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FUND Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2020 ‐218,659.60 437,094.74 876,148.29 2021 275.71 225,409.31 450,429.11 901,529.16 2022 4,321.73 236,369.52 $‐ $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 ThousandsSurface Water Fees Comparison Attachment D 06/30/21 06/30/22 Building Permit Issued 168 171 Building Permit Fees 77,887 250,122 Building Plan Review Fees 36,599 138,705 TOTAL BUILDING FEES 114,486 388,826 Valuations of Projects 9,693,244 41,024,271 HVAC Permits Issued 134 131 HVAC Permit Fees 30,806 107,411 HVAC Plan Review Fees ‐ 118 TOTAL HVAC FEES 30,806 107,528 Valuation of Projects 1,918,244 7,980,682 Plumbing Permits Issued 87 92 Plumbing Permit Fees 7,856 22,813 Plumbing Plan Review Fees ‐ ‐ TOTAL PLUMBING FEES 7,856 22,813 Valuation of Projects 400,756 1,583,499 TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED 389 394 TOTAL PERMIT FEES 153,147 519,168 TOTAL VALUATION OF PROJECTS 12,012,243 50,588,453 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED PERMIT DATA FOR BUILDING, HVAC AND PLUMBING CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA FROM PERMITWORKS SOFTWARE Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6C MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2 5, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director SUBJECT: Transfer fund balance from General Fund to PIR Capital Fund Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Transfer $102,540 from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement (PIR) Fund and authorizing the Finance Director to complete all corresponding budget adjustments. Increase the street maintenance budget by $177,280 for overages from the Coon Rapids JPA and PW 2022 in-house street maintenance project. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background In 2014, the Council adopted a revised Fund Balance Policy which directs the Finance Director to bring a request to the City Council to transfer any excess funds over 50% of fund balance in the General Fund to the PIR Fund once the final audit is completed. The intent of the policy is to utilize the funds for one-time, non-operating items. The primary considerations of the policy are 1) to meet the cash flow requirements of the City; 2) to maintain adequate fund balances and net assets in each individual fund of the City; and 3) to provide for emergencies and contingency needs of the City. These goals are accomplished by transferring the funds to any capital fund in need. Discussion The amount available for transfer based on the 2021 audit is $279,820. The 2022 Street Maintenance work is utilizing $177,280 of this amount. Staff is proposing to transfer the remaining amount of $102,540 to the PIR Fund per the discussion with the Council at the July 18, 2022 Work Session. The table below lists some of the main reasons for this excess: Page 2 of 2 Permit revenue 205,000 Street maintenance costs 115,000 Rec Coordinator eliminate position 97,980 Planning vacancies net of consultant 25,000 Building Inspection vacancies net of contract (265,000) Public Works vacancy 32,500 Property taxes - petitions 45,000 255,480 Budget Impact Increase in transfers out of the General Fund and transfers in to the PIR Fund; increase in 2022 Street Maintenance costs. Attachments None Page 1 of 2 DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers David Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Lift Station Rehabilitation – Lift Station 14 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Sources: $90,000 $116,200 Sanitary Sewer Fund Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Quote for replacement of the control panel and pump at Lift Station 14 in the amount of $116,200 from Electric Pump. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion The City has maintained a program to refurbish and update sanitary sewer lift stations on a 10- year cycle for reliability, technology and risk management. The proposed improvements continue this program for the 14 sanitary lift stations within the City's wastewater collection system. The City’s Capital Improvement Program identifies rehabilitation work for Lift Station No. 14 located off Hamline Avenue near the Public Works facility. The proposed improvement includes replacing the control panel and one of the pumps. Lift Station 14 is the final lift station that needs a control panel upgrade and Public Works will restart the 10-year cycle of the program. Below is the list of proposed rehabilitation projects for lift stations from the 2022-2026 CIP: • Lift Station 14 - Pump and panel (2022) $90,000 • Lift Station 5 - Forcemain (2023) $300,000 • Lift Station 8 - Pumps, base and electronics (2027) $90,000 • Lift Station 2 - Pumps, base and electronics (2028) $75,000 • Lift Station 5 - Pumps, base and electronics (2029) $77,000 • Lift Station 7 - Pumps, base and electronics (2030) $80,000 CONSENT ITEM – 6D MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact This project will be covered by the sanitary sewer fund, the total project cost is $116,200 which includes an estimated $2,200 in freight costs as shown in Attachment A, which is above the budgeted amount of $90,000. Prices for materials have increased significantly since the project was originally budgeted. Staff recommends approval of the quote from Electric Pump to replace the control panel in the amount of $116,200. Only one quote was obtained for this work. The City utilizes Electric Pump for all of its lift stations for consistency in materials and parts. This makes repair time more efficient if there is ever a failure. Timeliness of repairs is necessary for lift stations as it could cause a lot of damage to connected properties if the system backs up. Attachments Attachment A: Quote for Replacement of Control Panel and Pump QUOTATION QUOTED TO:JOB LOCATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PW LIFT STATION #14 4565 HAMLINE AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 SAINT PAUL, MN 55112 Page:1 QUOTE NUMBER: QUOTE DATE: SALESPERSON: CUSTOMER NO: 0184978 6/24/2022 7550211 EXPIRE DATE:7/25/2022 ANTHONY THEISEN QUOTED BY:MKH LS #14 REHAB 201 4th Ave SW New Prague, MN 56071 USA Telephone: (952)758-6600 / FAX (952)758-7778 Toll Free 1-800-536-5394 www.electricpump.com CONFIRM TO: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461 CUSTOMER P.O. LS # 14 SHIP VIA BEST WAY F.O.B.TERMS NET 30 DAYS ITEM NUMBER UNIT AMOUNTQUANTITY 114,000.00 RE: LS #14 REHAB PROJECT --PUMP #2 REPLACED IN 8/2021 --FLYGT NP3153 PUMP, BASES, PIPING & INSTALLATION --REPLACEMENT CONTROL PANEL ELECTRIC PUMP OFFERS: 0031530950251 EACH1.00 FLYGT MODEL 3153 WITH NP465 HARD IRON IMPELLER AND INSERT RING, 4", 12/460V/3 50' FM FLS FV NP465-4 12/460/3 50' FM FLS FV 1400000407129 EACH2.00 MINI-CASII/FUS 120/24VAC,24VDC 0000006510701 EACH1.00 BRACKET,SLIDING 2" 3153,3171+ CI 0000000830453 EACH4.00 SCREW,ALLEN M12 X 45 SS 0000005401305 EACH2.00 CONNECTION,DISCH 4X4" CI 6AHB EACH1.00 6-HOOK U-TYPE STAINLESS STEEL FLOAT BRACKET J-HOOK EACH4.00 J-HOOK, SS 2" UPPER GUIDE EACH2.00 2" UPPER GUIDE DOUBLE RAIL FOR FLYGT 2"X4" INTERMEDI EACH2.00 SS INTERMEDIATE BRACKETS COMPATIBLE WITH FLYGT SPS40T4L2 FEET120.00 2" SS 304 SCH 40 GUIDE PIPE/20' LENGTH MINIMUM *** Continued *** QUOTATION QUOTED TO:JOB LOCATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PW LIFT STATION #14 4565 HAMLINE AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 SAINT PAUL, MN 55112 Page:2 QUOTE NUMBER: QUOTE DATE: SALESPERSON: CUSTOMER NO: 0184978 6/24/2022 7550211 EXPIRE DATE:7/25/2022 ANTHONY THEISEN QUOTED BY:MKH LS #14 REHAB 201 4th Ave SW New Prague, MN 56071 USA Telephone: (952)758-6600 / FAX (952)758-7778 Toll Free 1-800-536-5394 www.electricpump.com CONFIRM TO: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461 CUSTOMER P.O. LS # 14 SHIP VIA BEST WAY F.O.B.TERMS NET 30 DAYS ITEM NUMBER UNIT AMOUNTQUANTITY *4" DIP/FITTINGS EACH1.00 (1) LOT OF 4" WET WELL DISCHARGE PIPING, INCLUDES: (2) 4" 90 DEG BENDS, (2) LENGTHS 4" DUCTILE PIPE, (2) 4" MEGA FLANGE ADAPTERS W/SS ACCESSORIES, (4) SS NUT, BOLT AND GASKETS KITS, 8" SCH80 PVC PIPE AND SS RISER CLAMPS FOR STILLING WELL. *MISC EACH1.00 MISC INSTALL MATERIALS, SS WEDGE ANCHORS, SS THD ROD, SS CPLGS, ETC *4" VALVES/FITTINGS EACH1.00 (1) LOT OF VALVE VAULT FITTINGS, INCLUDES: (1) 4" RD CHECK VALVE (WE WILL RE-USE PUMP #2 CHECK AS IT IS FAIRLY NEW), (3) 4" GATE VALVES, (2) 4" 90 DEG BENDS, (1) 4X4X4 SIDE OUTLET TEE, (1) 4" BLIND FLANGE, (2) 4" MEGA FLANGE ADAPTERS W/SS ACCESSOIRES, (11) SS NUT, BOLT AND GASKET KITS. *CONCRETE PAD EACH1.00 CONCRETE PAD FOR PANEL, 40" WIDE X 96" LONG (1) CONCRETE BOLLARD, INSTALLED BY KLEIN UNDERGROUND *FIELD SERVICE EACH1.00 ELECTRIC PUMP SERVICE TECHS TO REMOVE PUMPS, BASES, GUIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES AND DISCHARGE PIPING AND INSTALL (1) NEW FLYGT PUMP, NEW BASES & GUIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES, AND 4" DISCHARGE PIPING & VALVES, ALONG WITH THE RE-INSTALL OF THE EXSITING FLYGT PUMP #2. INCLUDES ALL TRIP AND TRAVEL, AND CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT. *** Continued *** QUOTATION QUOTED TO:JOB LOCATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PW LIFT STATION #14 4565 HAMLINE AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 SAINT PAUL, MN 55112 Page:3 QUOTE NUMBER: QUOTE DATE: SALESPERSON: CUSTOMER NO: 0184978 6/24/2022 7550211 EXPIRE DATE:7/25/2022 ANTHONY THEISEN QUOTED BY:MKH LS #14 REHAB 201 4th Ave SW New Prague, MN 56071 USA Telephone: (952)758-6600 / FAX (952)758-7778 Toll Free 1-800-536-5394 www.electricpump.com CONFIRM TO: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461 CUSTOMER P.O. LS # 14 SHIP VIA BEST WAY F.O.B.TERMS NET 30 DAYS ITEM NUMBER UNIT AMOUNTQUANTITY /START99 HOUR1.00 PUMP START UP SERVICES FOR FLYGT WARRANTY CERTIFICATION NOTE: CUSTOMER IS REPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING BYPASSING OF STATION WHILE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED. ELECTRIC PUMP WILL INSTALL THE CUSTOMER PROVIDED PLUGS AS NECESSARY. DUPLEX CONTROL PANEL *CONTROL PANEL EACH1.00 EP/PUMPCON DUPLEX CONTROL PANEL, (SIMILAR TO PREVIOUSLY SUPPLIED PANELS), NEMA 4X 304SS ENCLOSURE W/3PT PAD-LOCKABLE HANDLE, 18" LEGS, DRIP SHIELD AND LOUVERED/FILTERED SKIRTS, 100A GENERATOR RECEPTACLE-LEFT SIDE MOUNTED WITH ANGLE ADAPTER, NEMA RATED STARTERS, MINI CAS, LC150 CONTROLLER, ISS-105, 200W STRIP HEATER, ETM, PILOT LIGHTS, TOP MOUNT RED LEXAN ALARM LIGHT WITH HORN & SILENCER, ADDITIONAL SPACE, UL698A LISTED. *OUTSIDE SVC EACH1.00 OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICES TO INSTALL NEW PANEL AND WIRE TO UTILITY POWER. *TRANSDUCER EACH1.00 MERCOID SUBMERSIBLE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER, 5# SENSOR, 60' PU CABLE GSI60NO EACH3.00 AS SUSPENDED MODEL G ECO FLOAT, 60' N/O (NON MERCURY) *MISC EACH1.00 MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL *** Continued *** QUOTATION QUOTED TO:JOB LOCATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PW LIFT STATION #14 4565 HAMLINE AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 SAINT PAUL, MN 55112 Page:4 QUOTE NUMBER: QUOTE DATE: SALESPERSON: CUSTOMER NO: 0184978 6/24/2022 7550211 EXPIRE DATE:7/25/2022 ANTHONY THEISEN QUOTED BY:MKH LS #14 REHAB 201 4th Ave SW New Prague, MN 56071 USA Telephone: (952)758-6600 / FAX (952)758-7778 Toll Free 1-800-536-5394 www.electricpump.com CONFIRM TO: JEFF FRID 651-755-1461 CUSTOMER P.O. LS # 14 SHIP VIA BEST WAY F.O.B.TERMS NET 30 DAYS ITEM NUMBER UNIT AMOUNTQUANTITY *CONTROL START UP EACH1.00 ELECTRIC PUMP CONTROLS TECH TO TRANSFER, SETUP AND INTEGRATE THE EXISTING ANG LIFT STATION COMMUNICATION BOX AND THE EXISTING OMNISITE TO THE NEW PANEL AND PERFORM START UP SERVICES. TOTAL SELL PRICE:$114,000.00 FREIGHT ADDITIONAL. EST: $2200.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. PLEASE CONTACT US WITH ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU MYRA HOFFMAN myrah@electricpump.com CC: ANTHONY THEISEN 612-710-9321 Net Order:114,000.00 Less Discount:0.00 Freight:0.00 Sales Tax:0.00 114,000.00 Order Total: All return goods must have written approval from Electric Pump, Inc. before returning. Credit will not be issued without written approval and if applicable there will be a Restock Fee. Please note that we are no longer offering a thirty(30) day validity date. Due to the current volatility in the materials market, pricing and ship dates are subject to confirmation at time of order. _______________________________________ ____________________________ Mayor Date Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 6E MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25 , 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Snelling Avenue North Street and Utility Improvements – Payment No. 2 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $1,497,000 $1,622,585 PIR, Special Assessments Future MSA, Utility Funds Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Payment No. 2 for the Snelling Avenue North Street and Utility Improvements Project to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $343,794.41 All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion On April 11, 2022, City Council approved Resolution 2022-020 Awarding the 2021 PMP Street and Utility Improvements construction contract to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. The project is approximately 75% complete. The utility improvements have been completed, the trail has been constructed and the first paving course of the street has been placed. Still to complete is final restoration of the disturbed areas, final paving course, striping and signage. Five percent is being withheld from the work completed in accordance with the contract documents. Payment No. 2 is in the amount of $343,794.41. Bolton & Menk has provided a recommendation to accept Payment No. 2 (Attachment A). Staff recommends that Council approve Payment No. 2. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact Total Construction Expenses: Original Contract Amount: $ 1,277,585.49 Other Expenses: Engineering Design: $ 112,172.00 Construction Mgmt: $ 87,684.00 Gen Admin & Legal: $ 20,000.00 Material Testing: $ 47,000.00 Const. Contingency: $ 78,143.00 $ 1,622,584.49 Attachments Attachment A: Bolton & Menk Letter of Recommendation Attachment B: Pay Request No. 2 H:\ARDH\0T1124965\7_Construction\D_Pay Applications\Pay App 2\Payment Recommendation Letter\20220708 Pay Application No 2 Recommendation.docx July 8, 2022 Mr. David Swearingen, P.E. City of Arden Hills 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Pay Application No. 2 Snelling Avenue North Street & Utility Improvements City of Arden Hills, Minnesota BMI Project No. 0T1.124965 Dear Mr. Swearingen: We are recommending approval of the enclosed Pay Application No. 2 and payment to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. Please request approval from the Mayor and Council at the July 25, 2022 Council Meeting. If approved, please sign the Pay Application, and return a copy of each to me. I will then forward the signed copies to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. for their records. Please call if you have any questions regarding this recommendation or the enclosed pay application. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brad Fisher, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST DISTRIBUTION: CONTRACTOR (1) OWNER (1) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - PW-20-0100 ENGINEER (1) BMI PROJECT NO. 0T1.124965 TOTAL AMOUNT BID PLUS APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $1,277,585.49 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE $777,871.75 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE $0.00 DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED $0.00 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS $777,871.75 RETAINED PERCENTAGE (5.0%)$38,893.59 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER PAYMENTS OR (DEDUCTIONS)$0.00 NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE $738,978.16 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES $395,183.75 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO.2 $343,794.41 Contractor:T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. 2370 E. Hwy 36 North St. Paul, MN 55109 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: ENGINEER: BOLTON & MENK, INC., 12224 NICOLLET AVE, BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 By , CONSULTING ENGINEER Date APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: OWNER: By Name Title Date And Name Title Date 2022 SNELLING AVENUE NORTH STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the contract amount for the period covered by this Estimate. CERTIFICATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT VP of Operations July 8, 2022 07/08/2022 Pay Request No.: 22022 SNELLING AVENUE NORTH STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTSCITY OF ARDEN HILLSBMI PROJECT NO. 0T1.124965WORK COMPLETED THROUGH FRIDAY, JULY 01, 2022ITEM UNITESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDNO.ITEMPRICEQUANTITYAMOUNTQUANTITYAMOUNTQUANTITYAMOUNT1 MOBILIZATION$65,000.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $65,000.00 0.50 LUMP SUM $32,500.00 0.90 LUMP SUM $58,500.002 CLEARING$1,050.00 2.00 EACH $2,100.00 4.00 EACH $4,200.00 4.00 EACH$4,200.003 GRUBBING$210.00 2.00 EACH $420.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.004 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL$1.31 811.00 LIN FT $1,062.41 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT$0.005 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX$525.00 9.00 EACH $4,725.00 9.00 EACH $4,725.00 9.00 EACH $4,725.006 REMOVE HYDRANT$787.50 2.00 EACH $1,575.00 2.00 EACH $1,575.00 2.00 EACH $1,575.007 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE$840.00 1.00 EACH $840.00 1.00 EACH $840.00 1.00 EACH $840.008 SALVAGE SIGN$42.00 5.00 EACH $210.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.009 SALVAGE MAILBOX SUPPORT$52.50 12.00 EACH $630.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0010 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) $8.00 31.00 LIN FT $248.00 31.00 LIN FT $248.00 31.00 LIN FT $248.0011 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) $5.00 722.00 LIN FT $3,610.00 505.00 LIN FT $2,525.00 597.00 LIN FT $2,985.0012 REMOVE WATERMAIN$21.00 229.00 LIN FT $4,809.00 127.00 LIN FT $2,667.00 127.00 LIN FT $2,667.0013 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)$21.00 25.00 LIN FT $525.00 25.00 LIN FT $525.00 25.00 LIN FT $525.0014 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER$6.50 445.00 LIN FT $2,892.50 440.00 LIN FT $2,860.00 440.00 LIN FT $2,860.0015 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT $12.00 50.00 SQ YD$600.00 45.00 SQ YD $540.00 45.00 SQ YD $540.0016 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT $8.00 515.00 SQ YD $4,120.00 300.00 SQ YD $2,400.00 427.80 SQ YD $3,422.4017 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT$3.50 349.00 SQ YD $1,221.50 300.00 SQ YD $1,050.00 310.10SQ YD $1,085.3518 ABANDON WATERMAIN$26.62 79.00 LIN FT $2,102.98 75.00 LIN FT $1,996.50 75.00LIN FT $1,996.5019 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS$5.00 765.00 SQ FT $3,825.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.0020 EXCAVATION - COMMON$28.00 168.00 CU YD $4,704.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 158.00 CU YD$4,424.0021 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE$28.00 522.00 CU YD $14,616.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 46.80 CU YD$1,310.4022 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT$18.00 627.00 CU YD $11,286.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 122.00 CU YD $2,196.0023 COMMON EMBANKMENT$28.00 180.00 CU YD $5,040.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 0.00 CU YD $0.0024 STABILIZING AGGREGATE$38.00 522.00 CU YD $19,836.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 39.80 CU YD$1,512.4025 HAUL & DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED SOIL $55.00 487.00 CU YD $26,785.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 0.00 CU YD $0.0026 SUBGRADE PREPARATION$295.00 46.00 RDST $13,570.00 0.00 RDST $0.00 46.00 RDST $13,570.0027 AGGREGATE SURFACING, CLASS 2$45.00 18.00 CU YD $810.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 0.00 CU YD $0.0028 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5$28.00 157.00 CU YD $4,396.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 82.00 CU YD $2,296.0029 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION$3.50 20,568.00 SQ YD $71,988.00 20,568.00 SQ YD $71,988.00 20,568.00 SQ YD $71,988.0030 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT$0.01 681.00 GAL $6.81 0.00 GAL $0.00 200.00 GAL $2.0031 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) 3.0" THICK $28.00 427.00 SQ YD $11,956.00 0.00 SQ YD $0.00 0.00 SQ YD $0.0032 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) $76.50 3,530.00 TON $270,045.00 0.00 TON $0.00 1,623.50 TON $124,197.7533 15" RC PIPE APRON$1,722.11 10.00 EACH $17,221.10 9.00 EACH $15,498.99 9.00 EACH $15,498.9934 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN$71.16 150.00 LIN FT $10,674.00 150.00 LIN FT $10,674.00 150.00 LIN FT $10,674.0035 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT$458.90 1.00 EACH $458.90 1.00 EACH $458.90 1.00 EACH $458.9036 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V$90.95 225.00 LIN FT $20,463.75 219.00 LIN FT $19,918.05 219.00 LIN FT $19,918.0537 LINING SEWER PIPE 10"$106.79 140.00 LIN FT $14,950.60 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.0038 PRE-LINING HEAVY CLEANING$16.28 140.00 LIN FT $2,279.20 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.0039 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE$11,550.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $11,550.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $11,550.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $11,550.0040 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN$1,813.98 6.00 EACH $10,883.88 6.00 EACH $10,883.88 6.00 EACH $10,883.8841 HYDRANT$5,806.55 1.00 EACH $5,806.55 1.00 EACH $5,806.55 1.00 EACH$5,806.5542 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX$325.00 5.00 EACH $1,625.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0043 6" GATE VALVE & BOX$2,238.44 1.00 EACH $2,238.44 1.00 EACH $2,238.44 1.00 EACH$2,238.4444 8" GATE VALVE & BOX$2,897.63 8.00 EACH $23,181.04 8.00 EACH $23,181.04 8.00 EACH $23,181.0445 BURSTING PITS - TRENCHLESS WATERMAIN $3,451.88 1.00EACH $3,451.88 1.00 EACH $3,451.88 1.00 EACH $3,451.8846 CONNECTION PITS - TRENCHLESS WATERMAIN $3,451.88 4.00 EACH $13,807.52 3.00 EACH $10,355.64 3.00 EACH $10,355.6447 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52$109.03 16.00 LIN FT $1,744.48 13.50 LIN FT $1,471.91 13.50 LIN FT $1,471.9148 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52$121.89 159.00 LIN FT $19,380.51 202.50 LIN FT $24,682.73202.50 LIN FT $24,682.7349 PIPE BURST 8" WATERMAIN$103.51 551.00 LIN FT $57,034.01 493.00 LIN FT $51,030.43493.00 LIN FT $51,030.4350 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS$17.69 761.00 LB $13,462.09 982.00 LB $17,371.58 982.00 LB $17,371.58ESTIMATEDAS BID PREVIOUS ESTIMATE COMPLETED TO DATEH:\ARDH\0T1124965\7_Construction\E_Quantities\0T1.124965 Pay Application No 2.xlsmPage 2 of 37/8/202212:57 PM Pay Request No.: 22022 SNELLING AVENUE NORTH STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTSCITY OF ARDEN HILLSBMI PROJECT NO. 0T1.124965WORK COMPLETED THROUGH FRIDAY, JULY 01, 2022ITEM UNITESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDNO.ITEMPRICEQUANTITYAMOUNTQUANTITYAMOUNTQUANTITYAMOUNTESTIMATEDAS BID PREVIOUS ESTIMATE COMPLETED TO DATE51 CASTING ASSEMBLY$1,100.00 13.00 EACH $14,300.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 14.00 EACH $15,400.0052 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING$795.00 2.00 EACH $1,590.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0053 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL (2'X3' CB) $679.94 43.90 LIN FT $29,849.37 43.90 LIN FT $29,849.37 43.90 LIN FT $29,849.3754 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4022 $581.34 7.00 LIN FT $4,069.38 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.0055 INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEM RESTORATION $45.00 151.00 SQ YD $6,795.00 0.00 SQ YD $0.00 0.00 SQ YD $0.0056 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III$157.50 55.00 CU YD $8,662.50 50.00 CU YD $7,875.00 50.00 CU YD $7,875.0057 6" CONCRETE WALK$13.13 1,521.00 SQ FT $19,970.73 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 1,101.00SQ FT $14,456.1358 3" BITUMINOUS WALK$2.50 38,242.00 SQ FT $95,605.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.0059 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 $15.23 7,775.00 LIN FT $118,413.25 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 7,587.00 LIN FT $115,550.0160 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN S518 (MOD) $31.50 32.00 LIN FT $1,008.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 32.00 LIN FT $1,008.0061 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT$56.70 89.00 SQ YD $5,046.30 0.00 SQ YD $0.00 40.60 SQ YD $2,302.0262 7" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER$85.05 28.00 SQ YD $2,381.40 0.00 SQ YD $0.00 28.00 SQ YD $2,381.4063 TRUNCATED DOMES$52.50 204.00 SQ FT $10,710.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 256.00 SQ FT $13,440.0064 RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES $1,000.00 2.00 EACH $2,000.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0065 INSTALL MAILBOX SUPPORT$157.50 12.00 EACH $1,890.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0066 INSTALL BRICK PAVERS$22.00 572.00 SQ FT $12,584.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.0067 TRAFFIC CONTROL$28,000.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $28,000.00 0.25 LUMP SUM $7,000.00 0.90 LUMP SUM $25,200.0068 DYNAMIC SPEED DISPLAY SIGN$13,600.00 1.00 EACH $13,600.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0069 INSTALL SIGN$262.50 5.00 EACH $1,312.50 0.00 EACH $0.00 0.00 EACH $0.0070 SIGN PANELS TYPE C$54.60 104.00 SQ FT $5,678.40 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.0071 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT$1,500.00 1.00 LUMP SUM $1,500.00 0.00 LUMP SUM $0.00 0.00LUMP SUM $0.0072 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION$125.00 18.00 EACH $2,250.00 0.00 EACH $0.00 17.00 EACH $2,125.0073 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER $3.25 10,232.00 LIN FT $33,254.00 9,860.00 LIN FT $32,045.00 9,860.00 LIN FT $32,045.0074 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW$37.00 863.00 CU YD $31,931.00 0.00 CU YD $0.00 0.00 CU YD $0.0075 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 W/ SEED $3.25 9,077.00 SQ YD $29,500.25 0.00 SQ YD $0.00 0.00 SQ YD $0.0076 4" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT$0.58 428.00 LIN FT $248.24 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.0077 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT$5.88 283.00 LIN FT $1,664.04 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT$0.0078 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT $1.16 4,103.00LIN FT $4,759.48 0.00 LIN FT $0.00 0.00 LIN FT $0.0079 PAVEMENT MESSAGE MULTI-COMPONENT $7.35 30.00 SQ FT $220.50 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.0080 CROSSWALK MULTI-COMPONENT$4.20 720.00 SQ FT $3,024.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.00 0.00 SQ FT $0.000 0FINALTOTAL AMOUNT:$1,277,585.49 $415,982.89 $777,871.75H:\ARDH\0T1124965\7_Construction\E_Quantities\0T1.124965 Pay Application No 2.xlsmPage 3 of 37/8/202212:57 PM Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 6F MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Parkshore Drive Watermain Repair Invoice Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $31,340 remaining $33,212 Water Utility Fund of $50,000 budget Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Payment of the invoice from Saint Paul Utilities & Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $33,212. All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background/Discussion On Sunday May 1, 2022, a watermain break on a 12-inch main was detected on Parkshore Drive in the early evening. City staff addressed the situation by isolating the leak. Unfortunately, the water could not be shut down completely due to the apartment building being served directly off the main. Public Works throttled down the pressure to slow the leak while still supplying water to the apartments overnight. The repairs were made Monday morning May 2, 2022, by Saint Paul Utilities & Excavating, Inc. Since the water had to be left on overnight, there was an estimated 3,000,000 gallons lost which equates to approximately $9,450. Staff has reviewed the invoice (Attachment A) and recommends that the City proceed with the approval of payment in the amount of $33,212. Budget Impact This invoice exceeds the amount remaining in the budget for water main breaks. The Water Fund will need to absorb this cost in other areas of the budget. Attachments Attachment A: SPU & E Invoice Date:July 21, 2022 We DIG integrity, quality and teamwork on every project 190 Ryan Lane, Little Canada, MN 55117 Phone 651-484-8766 Fax 651-482-0285 Project Name Work description Item Quantity Cost TOTAL Material Foreman w/ Utility Truck 8.0 hours 115$ 920 Foreman OT 5.0 hours 151$ 755 John Deere Excavator 10.0 hours 245$ 2,450 Bobcat Skid Loader 10.0 hours 175$ 1,750 Bomag Compactor 1.0 rental 831$ 831 Dump Truck 28.0 hours 145$ 4,060 John Deere Loader 10.0 hours 175$ 1,750 Vactor Truck 1.0 day 3,331$ 3,331 12" 45 Degree Bend 1.0 unit 626$ 626 12" DIP sleeve 1.0 unit 577$ 577 12" DIP Pipe 20.0 feet 92$ 1,844 12" Megalug and Accessories 1.0 unit 515$ 515 Select Sand 160.0 tons 15$ 2,400 CA 67 Stone 39.0 tons 47$ 1,842 Class 7 Recycle 63 tons 14$ 882 Millings 56 tons 14$ 784 Laborer 24 hours 90$ 2,160 Labor OT 4 hours 126$ 504 American Jetting 1 Invoice 2,433$ 2,433 Mandatory Sunday DT Labor 8 hours 162$ 1,296 31,712 1,500 Bond TOTAL 33,212 Request for Change Arden Hills Watermain Break Repair of watermain after a 45 degree bend was revealed to be leaking Mobilization Sub Total ____________________________________________ ____________________________ Mayor Date Page 1 of 17 PUBLIC HEARING – 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #22-0012 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following: Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 22-012 an application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for a project located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”) to redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one approximate 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash and one 8,950 square foot multi-tenant retail building. The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 9A. Background Launch Properties (“Applicant”) is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”). The Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Page 2 of 17 Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. 1. Proposal and Use: The two sites are currently developed with one vacant industrial building and associated parking lot developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would adjust the existing lot line to the west. The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site as follows: • Lot 1 would be for a new +/- 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash for Rocket Car Wash. • Lot 2 would be a multi-tenant building with a +/- 8,950 square foot building developed for Panera (~3,500 square feet), Pacific Dental (~3,000 square feet), and Bank of America (~2,200 square feet). The Subject Property would remain two lots and function as a single entity with shared site operations such as parking, access, snow removal, etc. as part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. Previous City Council Review The City Council discussed this project at a Work Session on April 18, 2022. Plan Evaluation A PUD proposal shall identify any requested modifications from the applicable zoning requirements as well as the reasons why the modifications would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the underlying B-3 District. Modifications to these requirements may be granted by the City without a variance through the PUD process. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission on July 6, 2022. The memo to the Planning Commission on this case is provided in Attachment L. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment M. Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary and Final Plat A. Lot Line Adjustment and Planned Unit Development The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. In the B-3 zoning district, proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites shall use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. A PUD promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. The City Council should evaluate the architectural style and building character based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this Page 3 of 17 purpose include, but are not limited to, building and landscaping materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, building components, height, roof-line, and setback. The platting process is required to create new parcels of land or to adjust the boundary between two parcels unless otherwise exempted under the ordinance. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. The Applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed project in further detail and where flexibility is being requested. A complete plan set has been submitted for the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master and Final PUD, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for both lots. Existing Lot Configuration: Proposed Final Plat: Adjusted Lot Line Page 4 of 17 The lot area requirements for the B-3 Zoning District are a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and 100 feet of lot width and 130 feet of lot depth. The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. B. Park Dedication Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Code (Public Use Dedications) states that the City may require as a condition of approval for a Planned Unit Development the dedication of land, or payment in lieu, and park improvement fees if it is determined the project will result in an increased demand for park land or improvements. In establishing the amount required the City is to take into consideration previous payments or dedications for park purposes. The two lots have been previously developed. The City Council in review of the application shall determine whether or not the proposed development will create an additional demand on park land. The Planning Commission did recommend for City Council consideration a condition that the Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. The Applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue but notes that one is planned as part of the Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. This would be consistent with the approval of the Lexington Station Phase 3 project. Staff has verified that the City and County will split the cost of new sidewalks 50/50. Chapter 13, Zoning Code Review 1. District Provisions, B-3 Service Business District – Meets Requirements Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Commercial (COM) on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Retail sales and service are a permitted use and a Drive-in businesses/Drive-up windows/Fast food restaurants and Vehicle – Motorized Service are a conditional use within this district. The Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment F. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 37,882 or 0.87 acre 151 feet 250 feet Lot 2 70,418 or 1.62 acre 230 feet – Lexington Avenue 224 feet – Grey Fox Road 224 to 284 feet – Lexington Avenue 230 to 250 feet – Grey Fox Road Page 5 of 17 The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.12 Meets Requirements Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 12% Meets Requirements Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 25% Meets Requirements Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 128 ft. Grey Fox Road Car Wash: 50 ft. – Grey Fox Road Meets Requirements Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. Multi-Tenant: 44 ft. (north) Car Wash: 60 ft. Meets Requirements Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) Multi-Tenant: 93 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Car Wash: 41 ft. (east) and 64 ft. (west) Meets Requirements Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. Lot 1 – 37,882 sq. ft. or 0.87 acre Lot 2 - 70,418 sq. ft. or 1.62 acre Meets Requirements Maximum Building Height 35 ft. Multi-Tenant – 22 ft. 4 in. Car Wash – 35 ft. Meets Requirements The proposed development meets the general district provision requirements. Front Front Side Rear Rear Front Side Side Page 6 of 17 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Lighting, Screening and Fencing, Landscaping, Parking Setbacks, Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – Meets Requirements The specifics of each of these are discussed more fully in the Planning Commission report. The Applicant has submitted a revised landscaping plan since the Planning Commission review compliant with the 25% minimum landscape lot area. This proposal meets all of the above listed district standard requirements. B. Building Positioning – Flexibility Requested • Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E of the Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The Applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement. • The front setback in the B-3 District is 50 feet from the property line. The proposed multi-tenant building will be 58.7 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and 130.6 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. Upon further analysis of the car wash floor plan it has been determined that the car wash building would also require flexibility for building positioning. The car wash front elevation of the building along Grey Fox Road is 45.4 feet wide. Therefore, the Applicant would be required to construct 22.7 feet of the building at the front setback line to satisfy the 50% requirement. In the proposed Rocket Car Wash design, the building has 18.25 feet of the building constructed at the 50 foot front setback line. C. Exterior Materials – Flexibility Requested • Minimum 75% of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. • Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. • Building colors shall be muted. Recommended colors include browns, grays, tans, beiges, and dark or muted green, blues, and reds. Bright or brilliant colors and sharply contrasting colors may be used for only accent purposes occupying a maximum of five percent (5%) of building façades. • Minimum 50% of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. Multi-Tenant Building – Meets Requirements The Applicant has met the 75% threshold with desired materials on all four elevations between the use of the brick masonry and fiber cement panels. Transparent glass is proposed on three elevations with opaque glass only on the north elevation. The Applicant has met the 50% transparency requirement on the east side facing Lexington Avenue and on the south side facing Grey Fox Road. The multi-tenant building design has a variation in rooflines as an identifier to Page 7 of 17 the individual storefronts with awnings above the entry as well as the front façade facing Grey Fox Road has modulation with the stepping back of each tenant space in the design. The following table shows the breakdown of materials for the multi-tenant building: Required Preferred Materials Proposed Preferred Materials Other Materials Required Transparency Proposed Transparency North Façade 75% 82% 18% N/A 28% (opaque) East Façade 75% 81% 19% 50% 51% South Façade 75% 83% 17% 50% 65% West Façade 75% 83% 17% N/A 33% Rendering of North and South Elevations Car Wash Building – Flexibility Requested The proposed building elevations consist of brick masonry, transparent glass, polycarbonate panels, and metal panels. The Applicant is seeking flexibility on the car wash building with regards to the 75% threshold with desired materials on the north and south elevations and the transparency requirements on the south elevation facing Grey Fox Road. The Applicant has shown the glass and polycarbonate materials as “Primary” in order to satisfy the building materials and transparency code requirements. Planning Staff has identified the use of clear polycarbonate as a request for flexibility under the PUD for building materials and transparency requirements. The following table shows the breakdown of materials for the multi-tenant building, highlighted in yellow is where requirements are not being met: Page 8 of 17 Required Preferred Materials Proposed Preferred Materials Other Materials (including polycarbonate) Required Transparency Proposed Transparency (glass only) North Façade 75% 70% 30% N/A 0% East Façade 75% 91% 9% N/A 19% South Façade 75% 57% 43% 50% 15% West Façade 75% 85% 15% N/A 44% Rendering of West and East Elevations Rendering of South and North Elevations A full plan set of building elevations for both buildings is included as Attachment E. The image below identifies the proposed building materials. Page 9 of 17 D. Number of Parking Stalls – Recommendation from Planning Commission Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. The following provisions would apply based on the proposed uses: • Fast Food Restaurant - 15 stacking spaces for each customer pickup window plus 1 for each 2 seats • Business & Professional Offices - 1 parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. • Clinics – 1 for each doctor or dentist plus 1 for each nurse, technician, or professional and 1 for each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area • Uses Not Specifically Noted – As Determined by the City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission (below are similar land use categories for reference) o Other Business and Industry – 1 for each employee on major shift plus 1 for each vehicle used in conducting the business or 1 for each 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater o Service Station – 3 for each enclosed bay and 1 for each employee The Applicant is proposing 77 parking spaces total for the development with one (1) electric vehicle charging station located on the multi-tenant lot in the SW corner of the parking lot. The following table breaks down the off-street parking requirements based on the proposed uses: Page 10 of 17 Land Use Proposal Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Fast Food Restaurant - 15 stacking spaces for each customer pickup window plus 1 for each 2 seats 60 seating spaces/28 stacking spaces 30 30 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,210 9 15 Dental Office – 1 space per dentist & technician, and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 3,069 sq. ft./ 7 employees 22 22 Uses Not Specifically Noted – As Determined by the City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission 3-5 employees on duty 10 The Applicant indicates the car wash will not include the option for customers to exit their vehicle for interior cleaning as part of the services offered. Customers are to remain inside the vehicle through the car wash tunnel and have the option to use the exterior self-service vacuum stations. The floor plan submitted for the car wash has the majority of the square footage dedicated to the equipment area and car wash tunnel. The Applicant has stated that since the car wash will not offer the full interior cleaning services, they will have fewer employees onsite and will likely not generate much of a demand for customer parking. They’ve allocated 10 parking spaces for the car wash land use. Additionally, the Applicant has stated there will be an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, maintenance, etc. Planning Staff has included as a recommended condition of approval that the agreement is reviewed by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. E. Freestanding Signs – Meets Requirements • Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one (1) freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. • Freestanding signs shall be located at least five (5) feet from any property line. • On-premise signage is defined as “A sign whose message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On-premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties.” The Applicant is proposing a shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site in compliance with setbacks requirements as part of the Master and Final PUD approval. The proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16 feet in height and has a total sign copy area of 95 square feet allocated between the four tenants as illustrated below. The multi-tenant freestanding sign has been revised since the Planning Commission review to be in compliance with sign code regulations. The image below is the new rendering as submitted in the Applicant’s updated narrative. Page 11 of 17 In addition, the Applicant is requesting a freestanding sign for Rocket Car Wash along Grey Fox Road. The master sign plan has identified this as directional signage. • City code defines an auxiliary sign as “a sign that provides direction for internal circulation, parking or entry, restrictions on parking, security warnings, or other similar primarily noncommercial signs that are directed at people that are entering, exiting, or on a particular property. Auxiliary signs do not include outdoor advertising signs.” • Auxiliary sign size limitations shall be a maximum of eight (8) square feet in sign copy area, maximum wall height of eight (8) feet, and a maximum freestanding sign height of eight (8) feet. The proposed sign is under eight (8) square feet and less than four (4) feet tall. In Sign District 5, a freestanding sign shall have a base of brick or rock-faced block in a color similar to or complimentary to the main structure on the site and that material must extend at least one-half way up the sides of the sign face. Since the Planning Commission review, the Applicant has revised the Rocket Car Wash auxiliary freestanding sign to comply with this provision. Illustration of Non-Illuminated Monument at Grey Fox Road Sign materials are noted to be consistent with building materials and will consist of fiber cement board and brick. Page 12 of 17 F. Menu Board Signs – Intent to Comply • A fast food restaurant under the city sign code Section 1240.04 is allowed menu board signage. • The menu board sign shall be no taller than eight (8) feet, a maximum of 40 square feet, up to two (2) signs are permitted per drive-through lane, and the total surface area of the two signs shall not exceed 40 square feet. In the original plan set, the Applicant had shown two menu board signs for Panera restaurant that had a combined sign area of approximately 50 square feet. The Applicant stated to the Planning Commission that they did not intend to request flexibility for menu board signs and this may have been a miscalculation on their part. Following the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has indicated in their final narrative that “all menu boards shall comply with City of Arden Hills code in size and design.” No updated renderings were submitted for Panera menu board signage. The sign plans are shown in Attachment G. Additionally, the car wash site plan has identified “smart signage” on the point of sale island layout enlarged plan. Rocket Car Wash had indicated that they were looking to install up to four dynamic displays within the drive-through area. Dynamic displays are prohibited except as allowed in Section 1240.04, Menu Board Signs for Fast Food Restaurant uses. The sign code also has a provision for an Applicant to seek a Sign Standard Adjustment through the PUD process, but this provision specifically states it shall not be used to permit dynamic display signage. Planning Staff has communicated a digital menu board would not be allowed for the car wash use under the sign ordinance. The Applicant and Rocket Car Wash have stated that they are not seeking review of digital signage at this time for the car wash use and intend to apply for a text amendment to expand the allowance of dynamic displays for other types of drive-in businesses. If this planning case were to be approved, Rocket Car Wash under current ordinance language would be required to comply with Section 1240.03, Manual Changeable Message Sign. G. Wall Signs – Flexibility Requested The Applicant is seeking approval of the Master Sign Plan under Sign District 5 for the Subject Property as part of the Final PUD. Sign District 5 encompasses all properties fronting on Lexington Avenue south of Interstate 694. During the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant stated that the car wash parcel would not be owned by Launch Properties. Rather this parcel would be sold to Rocket Car Wash, but remain under the terms of the Master and Final PUD. Launch Properties will retain ownership of the multi-tenant parcel. Without direct road frontage on Lexington Avenue, the car wash parcel would fall under Sign District 7 due to the Grey Fox road frontage. The maximum wall sign copy area by district is as follows: • Sign District 7 wall signage is a maximum of 45 square feet • Sign District 5 wall signage is a maximum of 80 square feet On the multi-tenant building, the Applicant has shown each tenant will have one wall sign on the south (facing Grey Fox Road) and the corner tenant will also have one wall sign on the east (facing Lexington Avenue) elevation. All of the proposed square footages for the multi-tenant building are under 80 square feet and comply with the district requirements. Page 13 of 17 For the car wash, the Applicant is requesting flexibility for additional wall signs and an increase in square footage allowed. The Applicant submitted a revised narrative following the Planning Commission review that states the request is “to allow 139 square feet in signs on the south and east elevation rather than 80 square feet.” The Applicant did not revise the sign renderings as submitted with the application. The following is a breakdown of proposed wall signage visible from the ROW as shown in the Master Sign Plan: • East Elevation: o Rocket Car Wash - 139 sq. ft. o Member Room – 25 sq. ft. o Free Vacuums – 25 sq. ft. • South Elevation: o Rocket Car Wash – 139 sq. ft. o Entrance – 14 sq. ft. Planning Staff did not include in the above summary Signs 8-10 within the drive-through lanes under the canopy because the text is only shown on one side facing north to be visible to approaching customers. Also, on the north elevation there is a wall sign to identify the “exit” of the car wash measuring up to six (6) square feet. The Applicant is requesting signage on the west and north elevations to be allowed as incidental signs. All signage for both buildings is noted to be internally lit or non-illuminated. Buildings will be allowed to utilize raceways or individually mounted letters as part of their sign plan. The signage plans are shown in Attachment G. H. Drive-Thru Facilities – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.04 of the Zoning Code lists additional requirements for review of drive-up facilities and automobile service stations. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly north of the Subject Property. The Applicant is proposing a drive-up window as part of the multi-tenant building and a drive-thru component as part of the car wash. The City Council as part of the land use application review shall require the following conditions to be met in determining site suitability for a drive-up windows and automobile service stations: A. The operation consists of one or more drive-up windows and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows. B. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such businesses using drive-up windows in said building or complex. C. Only one building or architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows will be allowed in addition to one freestanding business using a drive-up window. D. The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the appearance and function of the complex or building. E. An architecturally unified complex may consist of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent of providing a unified appearance and function is not compromised. Page 14 of 17 F. The applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the use will not interfere or reduce the safety of non-motorized movements, specifically pedestrian and bicyclists. The Applicant’s proposal includes a drive-up window for the fast food restaurant on the west side of the multi-tenant building. Customers will circulate along the east side (i.e. Lexington Avenue) in two drive-through lanes to accommodate 28 vehicles. With the proposed site layout, the multi- tenant building will feature a dual drive-thru lane running along the east and north sides of the building. These lanes will merge to one lane on the west side of the building where the pickup window will be located. The outermost drive-thru lane will be designated for “pre-order” pickup and the interior lane will be for the traditional menu board ordering. Customers enter the car wash on the north end and wrap around to the west side of the property splitting into three (3) point of sale (POS) lanes before entering the car wash tunnel. Customers leaving the car wash tunnel are exiting on the north side in a circular traffic pattern. It is stated that the car wash will not have a towel dry service. As customers exit out on the northern end, they are immediately wrapping around to the parking spaces to utilize the self-service vacuum stalls that face the car wash. • City code states “electronic devices such as loudspeakers or devices, and similar instruments, shall not be located within 50 feet of any adjacent lot regardless of use or zoning district.” For Panera, the electronic menu board is shown on the north side of the building. Again, the multi- tenant building is setback 44 feet from the north property line. This need for flexibility was identified by the Applicant during the concept review. The schematics for Rocket Car Wash include an illustration for the point of sale canopy and island layout which is approximately 25 feet from the west property line. No additional information was included in the submittal on amplification or display features of the automated pay stations for the car wash. As noted above, the Applicant has reference to “smart signage” shown on the point of sale island layout, but has stated that will not be part of this review. Based on the location of the point of sale canopy, the Applicant is seeking flexibility from the requirement for placement of electronic devices. I. Snow Storage Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant has identified in their civil plans a site plan for snow storage. They are proposing to store snow around the north, south, and west perimeters of the site. During the previous discussions, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. The Applicant had indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. J. Traffic Study and Site Circulation The site currently has four access points to the Subject Property. The access closest to Lexington Avenue and the westerly access onto the adjacent property are being discounted entirely as part of Page 15 of 17 the proposal. The Applicant intends to utilize two accesses for the proposed development. Access 1 will be located on the north side of Grey Fox Road, approximately 240 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 1 will be aligned with the existing Cub Foods access to the south to minimize conflict areas. Access 2 will also be located on Grey Fox Road, approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lane and one ingress lane. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment I for summary section of report). During the previous reviews, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the Subject Property. Since the Planning Commission review, the Applicant has submitted a plan illustrating vehicle movements. The pedestrian routes were identified as part of the civil plan exhibits. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 0.12 Maximum Building Height 35 feet Multi-Tenant – 22 ft. 4 in. Car Wash – 35 ft. Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 25% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 128 ft. Grey Fox Road Car Wash: 50 ft. – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Multi-Tenant: 45 ft. (north) Car Wash: 57 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Multi-Tenant: 90 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Car Wash: 40 ft. (east) and 63 ft. (west) Building Positioning 50% At Front Setback = 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington, +/- 130 ft. – Grey Fox Road Car Wash: Less than 50% at 50 ft. Minimum Parking Requirements Multi-Tenant – 54 spaces Car Wash - Recommendation from PC 77 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 20 feet Building Façade Transparency 50% transparency at front Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash – south facade Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash – north and south facades Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk & Bike Rack None along Lexington Avenue – Defers to project 6 foot sidewalk – Grey Fox Road Bike Rack – Multi-tenant Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 95 square feet Page 16 of 17 Fast Food Menu Board Signage 40 square feet Intent to Comply Wall Signage Sign District 5 Flexibility Requested Drive-Through Facilities Electronic Devices – 50 feet Multi-Tenant – approx. 44 feet Car Wash – approx. 25 feet Car Wash Conditional Use Permit In the B-3 District, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for Vehicle – Motorized Service which includes a car wash as a principal use since it provides “maintenance services” for motorized vehicles. Typical factors to consider in evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, noise from equipment (washers, blowers and vacuums), lights from vehicles, and queuing of vehicles waiting for service. The Applicant indicates the car wash will not include the option for customers to exit their vehicle for interior cleaning as part of the services offered. Customers are to remain inside the vehicle through the car wash tunnel and have the option to use the exterior self-service vacuum stations. Daily hours of operation will be 7 AM to 9 PM. The floor plan submitted for the car wash has the majority of the square footage dedicated to the equipment area and car wash tunnel. Other spaces identified are one employee office, breakroom, and a 275 square foot space marked as “Member Room”. The “members only room” is for monthly membership customers to access free perks such as floor mat washing equipment, cleaning products, and drying towels. Customers will be able to utilize one of the nine (9) self-service vacuums located adjacent to the building upon exiting the car wash. The vacuum stations to top of the hose are approximately 11 ft. tall. During the Planning Commission meeting, the Rocket Car Wash representatives stated they will be installing sound dampening equipment in the car wash and their employees perform daily/monthly maintenance that includes cleaning of the polycarbonate doors. The Applicant has provided a sound study conducted at a Rocket Car Wash location in Iowa taken in April 2022. The sound study is provided as Attachment J. Planning staff did request information on the polycarbonate material for durability, warranty, and maintenance practices, but that has not yet been provided. Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment K) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal has reviewed the site layout and has no additional comments at this time. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Fire Marshal will confirm sufficient spacing for emergency vehicle access and movements and fire hydrant locations. Page 17 of 17 Public Notice and Comments Notice was republished in the Pioneer Press on July 14, 2022. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case from this notification. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Updated Narrative D. Final Plat E. Building Elevations F. Civil and Landscape Plans G. Master Sign Plan H. Photometric Plan I. Traffic Study J. Sound Study K. Engineering Comment Letter L. Planning Commission Memo M. Draft Planning Commission Minutes N. Public Hearing Presentation Attachment A HcLii]iZ:kgh]]kigTT]iZLuTo]PLcc[TcRki[TV]vKTRiTRLLVTu[TV]uEkiRLkVTLP[gki[L 04+#HE [kZ[ocTLTPkiLP:]?LcckTv]V[TgTT]iZRLTLiR]gT:]:kiP]cgTT]iZLuT[TcR o^PLef[TcLEkiRLkV[TLhTgki[L15##HEETT]iZLvT[TcR]i[T:liP]c:[LgNTvL[T:] kV9uRTi?]cc %)-/KT?]Z[L309uRTi?]ccE]iiTkL//&&) icTk[T|]TLTRJ[TP[TRcT NTckLuT VkwuTVTvTiPTouokT kic HukbTP]ccikNTP[TRcTRVkuLigTT]iZi]c[TLooc]PL]ki Ng]Lc]VkiRkNTPkhocTTN[T:]HcLiiTu >TiTvLcc[TcRki[T>TiTuLcc[TcRki[T V]vKTRiTRLLXTu[TV]uVku[EkiRLL16##og EkiRLL07 h CLiLu/CLiLu)-;TPThNTv &)#)& =TNuLu 3=TNuL})2CLiL~+ ELuP[3ELvP[)2=TNvLv & 9ou]c09pu]c)/ELuP[& EL-EL)+9mu]c' CiT2CiT)1EL) Cc0Cc)/CiT& 9n+9n))Cc& ITqTgNTu1IToThNTu)09s& GPkNTu/GPkNTu)-ITrTgNTu& FkThNTu3FkTgNTu)2GPkNTv+ <TPThNTu1CLiLu3)#)+ FkTgNTu& DMjMx .*$*,DMjMy *,*$*, <UQUgNUz( @[TuTNLoocVku[TLNkTPki]RTuL]kiLiRRTPcLuT[L[T]iVkugL]kiLiRgLTu]LcNh]TS][[] Looc]PL]kiLuTPkgocTTLiRLPPuLToTuP]PkRTLiRkuR]iLiPTuTt]vTgTiAVcciRTuLiR[LALg vToki]OcTVkuLccPk]iPuuTRN[T:]vTcLTRk[ToukPT]iZkV[]Looc]PL]ki <LT 9ooc_8YI]Z{"LuTBVR]XVTuTi[Li[ToukoTzkiTu;LT HcTLTPkiLP[T:]HcLiiTvL0/&13)12## `Wk[LTLitT]kivTZLuR`iZ\`LoodaPL]ki! ,$" 6 $&+6$6/+6&& -$"6$(!6(61 6$"6-6-4+62 +,6232 .5$) " +%* # 0+'' /%"+6 9oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooococococococococococococococococooocoocooooo___________________8YI]Z{{{{{{{{"LuTBVR]XVTuT 6/1/2022 /RFDWLRQ0DS 7D[3DUFHOVB4XHU\UHVXOW 3HUVRQDO3URSHUW\ 7D[3DUFHOV &LWLHV &RXQW\2IILFHV 30 PL NP 5DPVH\&RXQW\ 5DPVH\&RXQW\01 $WWDFKPHQW% Narrative Proposed Redevelopment NWC Grey Fox Road & Lexington Ave. 2.50 acres: Guided Commercial 2040 Land Use Plan Developed by: Launch Properties, LLC. (“Master Developer”) Introduction Launch Properties, Inc. is excited to bring forward a revised retail redevelopment proposal for consideration for the current industrial-use property at the NWC corner of Grey Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. Historical Background and Setting The Subject Property consists of two parcels totaling 2.5 acres of land with parcel identification numbers 273023410001 (3737 Lexington Avenue North, 1.49 acres) and 273023410004 (1133 Grey Fox Road, 1.01 acres). The owner of both parcels is Store Master Funding III. The current tenant is Pace Industries. The Subject Property is developed with one 67,750-square foot, two story manufacturing building and is surrounded by asphalt parking and drive areas. The Subject Property was vacant prior to its development in 1964. Currently, the site is adjacent to retail uses on its north and south sides. Arby’s (adjacent to the north) and Cub Foods (adjacent to the south). The property is rectangular with the short side fronting Lexington Avenue (approximately 250 feet) while the length of the property faces Grey Fox Road (approximately 435 feet). 8SGDWHG8SGDWHGAttachment C 2040 Land Use The 2040 Land Use plan guides the site to Commercial. Purpose The purpose of the redevelopment is to provide convenient goods, services, and food for a wide range of Arden Hills’ residents, visitors, and workers in the area. Launch Properties views the current industrial use as an outlier in this strong retail trade area that fronts Lexington Avenue. The Site Plan The newly proposed site plan contemplates two new lots and two new buildings. Lot One (the western lot) would include a full service, national car wash provider (Rocket Car Wash). Lot Two would contain a three-tenant building comprised of a (i) national, fast-casual, bread, sandwich, salad restaurant (Panera), (ii) a national dental provider with local operating partner (Pacific Dental), and (iii) a national bank (Bank of America). Please Note: The new site plan accommodates the new expansion of Lexington Avenue road improvements. Orientation and Setting The shape and setting of this property are unique in that the property essentially has two “front yards.” The length of the property plays to Grey Fox Road, while the short side of the property fronts busy and active Lexington Avenue. This site plan design “plays to” and “activates” both Grey Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. First, the multi-tenant building is designed to show glass to Lexington by “stepping back” the southern elevation with glass “reveals.” The car wash sits close to Grey Fox Road, providing the car wash a view corridor to Lexington Avenue. Now the site welcomes both those on Grey Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. Both streets feel they have frontage. Glass Corner Reveals The Elevations The proposed design of the multi-tenant building combines Class A materials with classic modern articulation. The building design features movement and maximum eyes on the activity with a “step-backed” storefront with glass corners. PUD Parking The site plan hits the mark on parking for tenant’s demands. The two lots will have cross-parking and cross-access provided by a recorded Declaration. City Calcs Tenant’s Needs Restaurant 30 per code 30 needed Dentist* 24 per code 18 needed Bank 15 per code 15 needed Car Wash 0 (no code) 14 needed 69 per code 77 needed * Dentist staffing: City Code requires one (1) space per 200 sf = 15 spaces, plus one (1) space for each dentist = 2 spaces, plus one (1) space for each technicians = 7 for a total of 24 spaces. However. there are only 9 chairs in this facility with a maximum staff of 7 staff for 18 total spaces actually needed. VACCUUMSVACCUUMS Setbacks The Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The multi-tenant building does not meet this code and seeks flexibility in setback design and orientation to meet the below setbacks. By placing the multi-tenant building on the northern portion of the site, it conceals the less appealing back-of-house, drive-thru, but is still welcoming and has active glass on both Grey Fox and Lexington Avenue with “step-back” storefront glass reveals. Access, Drive-Thrus, and Relevant Operation Information Access: The redevelopment proposes an access point for each lot off Grey Fox Road. However, the development will be governed by a private, recorded Reciprocal Easement Operation and Access Agreement (REOA) between the two lots. Customers will be able to freely access each lot from either access point and park on either lot with the REOA. Even though you can use either access point, the positioning of the access points logically funnels customers to their respective destinations. Panera: The Panera restaurant has two drive aisles (see Exhibit below). The outside lane is for pre-order pick-up only. The popularity of phone apps and online ordering over the past few years has restaurants seeing a big increase in pre-orders. The inside lane has a more traditional drive-up menu ordering system for customers who were not able to pre-order. The menu and order board are located on the north side of the building hidden from view in the vicinity of the Arby’s menu board. See exhibit below for stacking. The wrap around design accommodates 28 vehicles. The design also features an escape route. Rocket Car Wash: Rocket Car Wash has a wrap-around drive-thru that contains all stacking on the property. Customers enter from Grey Fox Road, head north and wrap around to the west elevation to pay for their wash at automated pay stations. They will then head north into the one-way tunnel entrance and exit out the northern end. Upon exit, the customers immediately wrap around to the parking field to utilize the self-vacuum stalls that face the car wash, or they will exit the property on to Grey Fox Road. Hours of operation – typically 7am–9pm each day with 3 to 5 employees on duty. An acoustical Sound Study of the operation has been given to City Staff. Various levels of premium car wash packages and free vacuums for both monthly members and single use customers are available. Membership is not required, but free membership perks such as access to the “members only room” with floor mat washing equipment, free cleaning products, and drying towels. The car wash service is not just a premium car wash but intended to provide a customer experience that sets this location apart from the competition. Master Sign Plan The development will have a Master Sign Plan with shared monument sign of 96 square feet of Panels and will be less than 147 square feet of overall, which meets code. The multi-tenant building tenant signs shall follow City Code. We are asking for flexibility on the building signs for the Car Wash for their east and west elevation. The narrow shape of this lot has the Car Wash sitting almost 300 feet back from Lexington Ave. The Car Wash elevations seek not more than 139 square feet per elevation, which is still 100 square feet less than the amount of signs allowed on the multi-tenant building by code. See elevations above. Freestanding signage for the multi-tenant building and the directional entrance sign for the Car Wash shall be compliant with Sign District 5 design standards and requirements. All menu boards shall comply with City of Arden Hills Code in size and design. Walkability Plan Environmental Cleanup As part of the redevelopment of this property, which was built in the mid-1960s, Launch Properties will clean up and remove approximately $500,000.00 of hazardous materials in cooperation with the MPCA and install a new underground stormwater management system bringing the site compliant with 2022 watershed criteria. Narrative Conclusion Launch Properties is excited to bring forth this new concept with committed tenants that are ready to operate in Arden Hills. We seek your feedback and ultimate support. We seek two areas of flexibility to City Code with this submittal: • Drive-Thru Facilities: Flexibility for drive-thrus to be within 1,320 feet of another drive-thru. Also, Panera seeks flexibility to have their menu boards 45 feet from the eastern property line on Lexington rather than 50 feet from Lexington Ave. setback line. • Building Positioning: Storefront setback flexibility as it relates to Front Yard setbacks. • Car Wash Building Materials: The north façade of the Car Was is 5% shy of required materials and the south façade is 3% shy of required materials. The Car Wash requests the use of clear polycarbonate materials in lieu of glass to satisfy this requirement. • Car Wash Signs: Flexibility is requested to consider the Car Wash non-illuminated entrance sign as a “directional” sign and not a monument sign in the definition of the City Sign Code and to allow 139 square feet in signs on its south and east elevation rather than 80 square feet. # # # Attachment D (4(4$$$ 35(&$673$5$3(7&$3%/$&.0$6215<&('$5%2$5'6),1,6+('720$7&+:22'/22.3$1(/,1*2108/7,7(1$17%8,/',1*6,*1$*(&23<%<7(1$176 64)7 ,17(51$//</,*+7('&$%,1(7:,7+$&5</,&6,*1)$&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'%/$&.%5,&.1$6215<02180(176,*1727$/ 64)7 *UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH1'DWH,VVXHG $UGHQ+LOOV0XOWLWHQDQW5HWDLO'HYHORSPHQW $75$6+(1&/2685(3/$1 $75$6+(1&/2685(%$&. $75$6+(1&/2685(6,'( $75$6+(1&/2685()5217 $02180(176,*1)5217 $02180(176,*1%$&. $02180(176,*16,'(9,(::2))6,7(()5200/(;,1*7211$9((19,(::2))75$6++(1&/2685(5HYLVHG([KLELW6XEPLWWHG5HYLVHG([KLELW6XEPLWWHG$WWDFKPHQW( (4(4$$$ 35(&$673$5$3(7&$3%/$&.0$6215<&('$5%2$5'6),1,6+('720$7&+:22'/22.3$1(/,1*2108/7,7(1$17%8,/',1* 6,*1$*(%<7(1$176 64)7 ,17(51$//</,*+7('&$%,1(7:,7+$&5</,&6,*1)$&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'%/$&.%5,&.1$6215< *UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH1'DWH,VVXHG $UGHQ+LOOV0XOWLWHQDQW5HWDLO'HYHORSPHQW $75$6+(1&/2685(3/$1 $75$6+(1&/2685(%$&. $75$6+(1&/2685(6,'( $75$6+(1&/2685()5217 $02180(176,*1)5217 $02180(176,*1%$&. $02180(176,*16,'(9,(::2))6,7(()5200/(;,1*7211$9((19,(::2))75$6++(1&/2685(5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ %/$&.0$6215<6358&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'6358&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'3(5)25$7('0(7$/6,*1%$1'%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/*5$<0$6215<6725()5217*/$=,1*35(&$67&21&5(7(%$6(522)7230(&+$1,&$/81,77(1$176,*1$*(64)7 72),1,6+)/225%2&$123< 72%/$&.%5,&.3$5$3(7 72*5$<%5,&.3$5$3(7 720(7$/3$1(/3$5$3(7 522) *5$<0$6215<6725()5217*/$=,1*%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/35(&$67&21&5(7(%$6(522)7230(&+$1,&$/81,7%/$&.&23,1*72&$123< $$$$ 5HVWDXUDQW7HQDQW'HQWDO&OLQLF7HQDQW%DQN7HQDQW0HFK6) 6)6)*UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH1'DWH,VVXHG $UGHQ+LOOV0XOWLWHQDQW5HWDLO'HYHORSPHQW $(DVW)DFDGH(OHYDWLRQ $:HVW)DFDGH(OHYDWLRQ $3UHVHQWDWLRQ)ORRU3ODQ *5$<0$6215<%/$&.0$6215<%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/23$48(6725()52173$1(/%/$&.&23,1**5$<0$6215<35(&$67&21&5(7(%$6(%/$&.0$6215<*5$<0$6215<%/$&.0$6215<*5$<0$6215<%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/23$48(6725()52173$1(/%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/23$48(6725()52173$1(/522)7230(&+$1,&$/81,7522)7230(&+$1,&$/81,772),1,6+)/225%2&$123< 72%/$&.%5,&.3$5$3(7 522) 35(&$67&21&5(7(%$6(%/$&.0$6215<%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/6725()5217*/$=,1*6358&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'3(5)25$7('0(7$/6,*1%$1'3(5)25$7('0(7$/6,*1%$1'6358&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'3(5)25$7('0(7$/6,*1%$1'6358&(:22'/22.),%(5&(0(17%2$5'%/$&.0$6215<%/$&.0$6215<7(1$176,*1$*(64)77(1$176,*1$*(64)7%/$&.&23,1*%/$&.0(7$/&$123<72&$123< 7(1$176,*1$*(64)7*UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH1'DWH,VVXHG $UGHQ+LOOV0XOWLWHQDQW5HWDLO'HYHORSPHQW $1RUWK)DFDGH(OHYDWLRQ $6RXWK)DFDGH(OHYDWLRQ*5$<0$6215<628,;&,7<%5,&.02'8/$56/$7(9(/285%/$&.0$6215<%(/'(1%5,&.02'8/$5(%21<%/$&.%/(1'%/$&.0(7$/3$1(/),%(5&(0(17%2$5'1,&+,+$:22'/22.6358&(),1,6+3(5)25$7('67$,1/(6667((/0(7$/3$1(/ *UH\)R[5RDGDQG/H[LQJWRQ$YH1'DWH,VVXHG $UGHQ+LOOV0XOWLWHQDQW5HWDLO'HYHORSPHQW9,(:)5206(9,(:)5201(9,(:)5206:9,(:)5201: 6,*+7/,1(678'<'$7($5'(1+,//65(7$,/B$5'(1+,//6019,(:6,*+7/,1(678'< 6,*+7/,1(678'<'$7($5'(1+,//65(7$,/B$5'(1+,//6019,(:6,*+7/,1(678'< 6,*+7/,1(678'<'$7($5'(1+,//65(7$,/B$5'(1+,//6019,(:6,*+7/,1(678'< 6,*+7/,1(678'<'$7($5'(1+,//65(7$,/B$5'(1+,//6019,(:6,*+7/,1(678'< 6,*+7/,1(678'<'$7($5'(1+,//65(7$,/B$5'(1+,//6019,(:6,*+7/,1(678'< )LQLVK)ORRU %26LOO 727RZHU 723$5$3(7 723$5$3(7 +,*+ 0:36667/0$6*/$/800$667/0:3660:30&*/$/80*/67/)LQLVK)ORRU %26LOO 727RZHU 723$5$3(7 +,*+ 0:3*/$/800$66667/67/0$60$60$60&0:3*/$/80$/*)LQLVK)ORRU %26LOO 727RZHU 723$5$3(7 723$5$3(7 +,*+ 0:30&0&0$6*/0$60&0:30$6660$667/$/*)LQLVK)ORRU %26LOO 727RZHU 67/0$60$6*/723$5$3(7 0&0:367/0$60:3*/$/80723$5$3(7 +,*+ 0&0$65RFNHW&DUZDVK$UGHQ+LOOV6FKHPDWLF([WHULRU(OHYDWLRQV$ $(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 ($67 $(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 :(67([WHULRU0DWHULDO/HJHQG0$5. '(6&5,37,21$/* 35(),1,6+('$/80*877(5 '2:163287 &2/25 5('%/$&.$/80 35(),1,6+('$/806725()5217 &2/25 %/$&.*/ &/($5*/$=,1*7(03(5('*/ )5267('*/$=,1**/ 0032/<&$5%21$7(:$//3$1(/ &2/25 &/($50$6 ,17(*5$//<&2/25&21&5(7(0$6215<81,7 &2/25 602.(0$6 0$6215<9(1((5&2/25 0$1*$1(6(,52163270$6 0$6215<9(1((5&2/25 :+,7(0& 35(),1,6+('$/80&23,1* &2/25 %/$&.0:3 9(57,&$/0(7$/:$//3$1(/ &2/25 5('0:3 9(57,&$/0(7$/:$//3$1(/ &2/25 %/$&.0:3 +25,=217$/0(7$/:$//3$1(/ &2/25 :+,7(66 67$1',1*6($0522) &2/25 5('67/ '(&25$7,9(67((/&+$11(/ &2/25 %/$&.67/ 35((1*,1((5('$:1,1*:'(&25$7,9(67/&+$11(/ $(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 1257+ $(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 6287+([WHULRU(OHYDWLRQ1RWHV0$5. '(6&5,37,21 0(&+$1,&$/6&5((1 &2/257(;785(0$7(5,$/&+$1*( /('675,3/,*+7,1* 29(5+($'6(&7,21$/'225 9$&880(1&/2685(Rocket Carwash - Arden HillsExterior Material AnalysisMaterial Catergory SF %EAST ELEVATION0DVRQU\ 3ULPDU\ *OD]LQJ 3ULPDU\ 0HWDO3DQHO 6HFRQGDU\ 3ULPDU\7RWDO Total WEST ELEVATION 0DVRQU\ 3ULPDU\ *OD]LQJ 3ULPDU\ 0HWDO3DQHO 6HFRQGDU\ 3ULPDU\7RWDO Total NORTH ELEVATION0DVRQU\ 3ULPDU\ 3RO\FDUERQDWH 3ULPDU\ 3ULPDU\7RWDO Total SOUTH ELEVATION0DVRQU\ 3ULPDU\ *OD]LQJ3RO\FDUERQDWH 3ULPDU\ 0HWDO3DQHO 6HFRQGDU\ 3ULPDU\7RWDO Total ALL ELEVATIONS0DVRQU\ 3ULPDU\ *OD]LQJ3RO\FDUERQDWH 3ULPDU\ 0HWDO3DQHO 6HFRQGDU\ 3ULPDU\7RWDO Total MAS-1 MAS-2 MAS-3 MWP-1/2 MWP-3GL-3 7'-4"134'-0"22'-4 7/8"18'-3 1/8"4'-8"39'-0"36'-0"57'-8"8'-8"45'-4"141'-4"2,846 SFWash Tunnel100263 SFOffice107101 SFConference10673 SFStaff RR105131 SFLaundry1041,139 SFEquipment Room101275 SFMembers Room10287 SFRestroom10302020403040403010204040524'-4"16'-4"4'-8"45'-4"5RFNHW&DUZDVK$UGHQ+LOOVSchematic Floor PlanA11/8" 1'-0"$11F/225 3/$1F/225 3/$1 127(S0$5. '(S&5,37,21019$&880 S7$7,2102&$123< 29(5+($'03%8,/',1* 2FFS(7 *5($7(5 7+$1 4'-0" ,1 '(37+04&2/25/0$7(5,$/ &+$1*(05727$/ %8,/',1* S4F7 5640 VTIW1 6" THICK CIP CONC EQUIPMENT PAD7'-0" TALL TREX GATES8'-8"14'-8"SLOPE SLAB TOWARD GATE TO DRAIN1'-4"MAS-16" BOLLARD6" BOLLARD25548'-8"8'-0"PRECAST CAPMAS-1MAS-1PRECAST CAP6" STEEL PIPE. FILL WITH CONC.TYP - BOTH SIDES2" SQ TUBE STEEL FRAME1 1/2" X 1/4" STEEL BAR WELDED TO FRAMENOTE: ALL METAL COMPONENTS SHALL BEPRIMED & PAINTED BLACK.5" WELD-ON BARREL HINGE 600LB CAPACITY -10FT GATE ITEM 3HIB5 CENTRAL STEEL SUPPLY QUANTITY OF 3 EACH SIDE1X6 TREX BOARDS, E9ENLY SPACED # 6" O.C., IN GATE LEAF COLOR WINCHESTER GREY ATTACHED TO FRAME WITH 3/8" DIA. CARRIAGE BOLTSCANE BOLT DOWELLEDINTO CONCRETEHEA9Y DUTY SAFETY CHAINS WELDED TO TOP OF GATE BACK TO GATE POST1-1/2" [ 1-1/2" WELDED IRON ANGLES8'-0"7'-6"4 1/2"14'-8"3'-6"EQEQ3'-0"6'-0"6'-0"2'-4"3'-8"3'-0"CL OF GATECL OF CARPICSCL OF ATTENDANT AREACL OF OTTCL OF SMART SIGNAGECL OF BOLLARDCL OF BOLLARDCL OF FAST-ID POLEEQEQ12'-0"29'-1"1'-6"24'-0"25'-0"PAINT STRIPING, COOR. W/ CI9ILSMART SIGNAGE3"ATTENDANTAREAOTTFAST-PASSKEEP OUT AREAGATE2'-6"STEEL COLUMN, SEE STRCTSTEEL COLUMN, SEE STRCT4'-5 3/4"1'-6 1/4"20'-1"6" STL COLUMN PAINTED. COLOR BLACK18" STL BEAM PAINTED. COLOR BLACK14'-0"41'-10"POINT OF SALE EQUIPMENT14'-0"31'-0"POINT OF SALE EQUIPMENT6" STL COLUMN PAINTED. COLOR BLACK18" STL BEAM PAINTED. COLOR BLACKSchematic Site DetailsA23/8" 1'-0"A219ACUUM / TRASH / RECYCLING ENCLOSURE - PLAN3/8" 1'-0"A239ACUUM TRASH / RECYCLING ENCLOSURE - SIDE3/8" 1'-0"A229ACUUM TRASH / RECYCLING ENCLOSURE - ELE9ATION - FRONT1/2" 1'-0"A24ENLARGED PLAN - POINT OF SALE ISLAND LAYOUTN.T.SCUSTOMER 9ACUUM STATION1/4" 1'-0"A26POINT OF SALE CANOPY - ELE9ATION - NORTH1/4" 1'-0"A27POINT OF SALE CANOPY - ELE9ATION - EAST5RFNHW&DUZDVK$UGHQ+LOOV2122 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:20pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC000LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNNORTHVICINITYN.T.S.SITEARDEN HILLS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MN1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCHWHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI full bleed D(34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET.3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/ORUTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDINGPOSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:PROJECT TEAM:SURVEYOREGAN, FIELD, AND NOWAK, INC.ERIC ROESER1229 TYLER ST. N.E.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300ENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN,P.E.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197OWNER / DEVELOPERLAUNCH PROPERTIESDAN REGAN800 LASALLE AVE, SUITE 1610MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402TELEPHONE: (612) 564-4060LAUNCH RETAIL - ARDEN HILLSSECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 30N, RANGE 23WFORSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSARCHITECT10K ARCHITECTURECHAD HALLER525 A5TH AVE S, #7826HOPKINS , MN 55343(952) 594-31433LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.RYAN HYLLESTED, P.L.A.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197Sheet List TableSheet Number Sheet TitleC000 COVER SHEETC001 GENERAL NOTESC100 DEMO PLANC200 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1C201 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C300 SITE PLANC301 SITE DETAILSC400 GRADING PLANC401 GRADING DETAILSC500UTILITY PLANAttachment F This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:21pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC001LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOMEFAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALLWORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCTTHE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEAPPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK,EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL.3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02,ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATABY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TOTHE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLYVERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTINGUNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELYACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'SRESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THECONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURREDBECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FORTEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING ORRELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED ANDTHEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK.4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAYHAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCINGWORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIESPRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ANDBONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIALCONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THEOWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGNARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER.8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THEOWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATIONWHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATECONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THEOWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILTDATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES AREENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR.10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELLDRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALLBE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED.11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THEAPPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWNON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IFANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONOF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF ANIDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANYOBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER.13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THEDOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACTTHE ENGINEER AND OWNER.TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONSCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THEFOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:- PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATIONASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALKINSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'DTEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:- DENSITY TEST REPORTS- BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM- PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER- LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS- ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITYWATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES,AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTORSHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OFTRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETEACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THEMOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCOMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THENOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUGWHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACESWIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BEPLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I.PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONSWHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED.ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROMTHE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TOCOMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE.7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BECOMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'SSPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCYREQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIORTO BACK FILLING.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THESPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOTBE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ONGRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNERAND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICALCLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES.11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THECONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARYTO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE ISWATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORMSEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFICBEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALLBE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BEADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THECONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUTEXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY AREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TOSAME.16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERTOUT.17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORMSTRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN.18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED.19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARETO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE ANDBELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITYTO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OFCONSTRUCTION.21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER ISUTILIZED.22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITYCOMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATEFINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES.23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONSARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH ANDSPECIFICATIONS.25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALSSPECIFICATIONS.26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTDIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS.28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING.GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING ANDPROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S ASNECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASSSTAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THATSURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTORSHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADINGDISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OFPAVEMENT OR UTILITIES.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS,POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBEDDURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TOMATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES.5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THATTHE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALLBE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLYINSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED.6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETIONOF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEREGRADED AND SODDED.7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TESTAND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAINTOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED.8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLSAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAMETYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OFCONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURESSHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDEPOSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS.10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONALAGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEJURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALLGOVERN.12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREASSHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED ANDMAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FORANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR ATNO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHEDAS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING ANDSCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHERSUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNINGREGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURSOF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION,SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES.15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTINGAREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTEDAND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION.17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS AND MN/DOTSPECIFICATIONS.18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN.20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONSAND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALLREPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUTCOMPENSATION.22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS.ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET.24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT ANDSTORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITHCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUSGRADE.26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALTPAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING.EROSION CONTROL NOTES1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROLPLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONSOF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTIONSHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MNNATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOMEFAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCALREQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THETRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED,WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING ISREQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE INAN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALLFINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BYTHE GENERAL PERMIT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALLALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, ANDAREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BEDETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED.9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ONSITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS ANDOTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALEDCONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OFWIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE.12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED ASSOON AS IS PRACTICABLE.13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOTADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITHSOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICHTHEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIESIN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE ORSTORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTSINCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS,SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OFLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT.16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THEDESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ENGINEERING DIVISION.17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITESEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/ORADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSIONCONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCEALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALLJURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OFTHE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIEDPERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALLEVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OFUNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION.1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREASSHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTSREFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BEREMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE.3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENTTRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSINGOF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FORPARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING ASCONDITIONS DEMAND.5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION.PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAYSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION)OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTYREGULATIONS.2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUALON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKINGSTALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUSSTRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB.5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET.6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINTSEALANT.7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS INTHE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCEBY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THECONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER.10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A).GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALLCONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPESEXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NOCASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSTALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEERIMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTORCHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES.11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. 930930930930 930928928929931931931931931931932932932932932932933933933934933933930931931931931931931932932932932932932932932932932933933930929931932This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:22pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORDEMO PLANC100LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMN1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATIONAPPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS,PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANSCAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL ANDBROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRISIN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FORDEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OFDISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITYSERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ANDCOORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANYCONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES ANDANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BESTINFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEERASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHINALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK.6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACTLOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDPROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIESREGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDINGWITH THE WORK.7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED ORRELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BEPROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TOPROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TOEXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC.(AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARDENHILLS, <COUNTY> COUNTY AND MN/DOT.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURINGCONSTRUCTION.10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED.11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT ISREQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THESURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATERDEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION ISCONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OFCONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATERMAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITHWATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRACOMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNERIMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS.16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NOACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTESNORTHLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE BUILDINGREMOVE TREEREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE UTILITY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING J-BARRIEREXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SIGNEXISTING FLARED END SECTIONEXISTING STORM MANHOLEEXISTING STORM CATCHBASINEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVEEXISTING WELLEXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLEREXISTING ROOF DRAINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING METAL COVEREXISTING ELECTRICAL METEREXISTING AIR CONDITIONEREXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLEEXISTING CABLE BOXEXISTING GUY WIREEXISTING POWER POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING TREECLEARING & GRUBBINGFILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINESEXISTING TREE LINEEXISTING CURB & GUTTERLEGENDFULL DEPTH SAWCUTLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE(OFFSET FOR CLARITY)REMOVE EXISTING SANITARYREMOVE CONNECTION TO BUILDINGAND POWER POLECOORDINATE WITH ELETRICAL COMPANYREMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTREMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTREMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTREMOVE EXISTING CURBREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETEREMOVE EXISTING CURBREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETEREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETEREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETEREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETEREMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGREMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTPROTECT EXISTING ASPHALTPROTECT EXISTING UTILITIESREMOVE EXISTING TREE(TYP.)REMOVE EXISTING TREE(TYP.)REMOVE EXISTING TREE(TYP.)REMOVE EXISTING TREE(TYP.)REMOVE ASPHALT FOR WATER CONNECTIONREMOVE ASPHALT FOR STORM SEWER CONNECTIONREMOVE CONNECTION TO BUILDINGCOORDINATE WITH ELETRICAL COMPANYREMOVE EXISTING WOOD FENCEREMOVE EXISTING WOOD FENCEREMOVE EXISTING WOOD FENCE PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 AC20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKR15.0'R15.0'R8.0'R8.0'R30.0'R30.0'R25.0'R15.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'R8.0'R8.0'R6.0'R8.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R8.0'10.5'10.5' 13.0'18.0'9.0'59.2'44.3' 44.2'58.7'130.6' 50.0'93.0'93.0'41.3'42.3'56.8' 60.8'64.9'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC300LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNMULTI-TENANT BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY 1.62 ACBUILDING AREA8,950 SF (12.68% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGPROPOSED MULTI-TENANT PARKING 67 SPACESMULTI-TENANT ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED3 STALLS / 3 STALLSTOTAL PROPERTY SUMMARYLAUNCH RETAIL - ARDEN HILLSTOTAL PROPERTY AREA108,300 SF (2.49 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION600 SF (0.01 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA108,900 SF (2.50 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA95,231 SF (2.19 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA35,193 SF (0.81 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA130,424 SF (3.00 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGB-3 - SERVICE BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKPATCH EXISTING GREY FOX ROAD - FOLLOW CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILSMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSBIKE RACKMONUMENT SIGNB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBVEHICLE CHARGING STATIONTRASH ENCLOSURERELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLEVACUUM STALLABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg July 12, 2022 - 12:26pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1PLANNING COMMISSION REVS. 7/12/22 CGMSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OFVESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS ANDEXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY.ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. ASREQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS ANDPROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED INBASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY ENF, DATED05/28/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 2.50 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL &INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITSNECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OROTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTSOF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.AAAAACCDDDDDAGGFFGGGHHHHHHHLLLLLLMMNBEGREY FOX RD.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.DDDDCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSNORTHOJREFER TO LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENT PLANS BY OTHERSFOR LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENTSKPQQDPTIE INTO EXISTING DRIVECOORDINATE TIE IN LOCATIONWITH PLANS BY OTHERS FORLEXINGTON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTSGGFERRRRRRRRRRCAR WASH BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY 0.87 ACBUILDING AREA4,915 SF (12.97% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGPROPOSED CAR WASH PARKING 10 SPACESCAR WASH ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED1 STALLS / 1 STALLS5HYLVHG6LWH3ODQ6XEPLWWHG5HYLVHG6LWH3ODQ6XEPLWWHG PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 ACR15.0'R15.0'R8.0'R8.0'R30.0'R30.0'R25.0'R15.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'R8.0'R8.0'R6.0'R8.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R8.0'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC300LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY108,900 SF (2.50 AC)BUILDING AREA8,950 SF (8.22% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGPROPOSED MULTI-TENANT PARKING 67 SPACESMULTI-TENANT ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED3 STALLS / 3 STALLSPROPOSED CAR WASH PARKING 10 SPACESCAR WASH ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED1 STALLS / 1 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYLAUNCH RETAIL - ARDEN HILLSTOTAL PROPERTY AREA108,300 SF (2.49 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION600 SF (0.01 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA108,900 SF (2.50 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA96,268 SF (2.21 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA34,412 SF (0.79 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA130,680 SF (3.00 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGB-3 - SERVICE BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKPATCH EXISTING GREY FOX ROAD - FOLLOW CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILSMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSBIKE RACKMONUMENT SIGNB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBVEHICLE CHARGING STATIONABCDEFGHIJKLMNOThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:24pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OFVESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS ANDEXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED ASNECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. ASREQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS ANDPROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED INBASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY ENF, DATED05/28/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 2.50 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL &INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITSNECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OROTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTSOF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.AAAAACCDDDDDDAGGFFGGGHHHHHHHLLLLLLMMNBEGREY FOX RD.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.DDDDCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSNORTHOJREFER TO LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENT PLANS BY OTHERSFOR LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENTSK5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 AC1.30%1.43%ST-10RE:930.98IE:924.61 WIE:924.61 SEST-14RE:930.98IE:925.52 SIE:925.52 EST-6RE:930.47IE:921.17 NIE:921.17 WST-11RE:930.98IE:922.98 NWIE:922.98 SST-5RE:930.46IE:920.48 WST-1RE:929.30IE:921.97 WST-2RE:929.30IE:921.93 EIE:921.93 SST-3RE:932.64IE:921.12 NIE:931.12 WIE:921.12 SWIE:921.12 EST-4RE:928.42IE:921.08 WIE:921.08 EST-7RE:930.03IE:921.13 N4 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.00%81 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.00%4 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.00%60 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.00%35 LF - 18" HDPE @ 2.00%13 LF - 18" HDPE @ 5.00%93 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.14%82 LF - 18" HDPE @ 2.00%90 LF - 18" HDPE @ 2.00%91 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.00%2.67%3.91%3.09%2.45%2.44%2.32%3.56%6.12%5.00%5.75%3.78%4.92%4.83%5.19%5.81%3.75%1.62%2.60%3.30%4.62%2.09%1.54%4.57%2.66%4.98%2.18%1.20%1.79%2.44%2.06%0.49% 4.80% 1.89%1.40%1.40%2.42%930931932930931931930929930931931931 9319329329309309309319319319299319309319319309319329329329319329319329323934933931932931932933931931932933931932931932931932DDDST-17RE:930.09IE:920.48 SOCS-1RE:931.61IE:918.43 EST-15RE:931.57IE:920.48 E93193193193193193093093093193293193193293193193293193293093193293193293193393393493393293293293193293193393293193193293293293193093193292973 LF - 12" PVC@ 5.00%75 LF - 12" HDPE@ 1.00%ST-20RE:930.27IE:921.87 WIE:921.87 NEST-19RE:929.38IE:922.81 NIE:922.81 E93 LF - 12" HDPE@ 1.00%187 LF - 12" HDPE@ 1.00%ST-21RE:929.63IE:924.67 SHP:930.16ME:930.00G:930.04ME:929.92HP:930.16G:929.54G:929.41G:929.13LP:928.43G:930.04HP:930.10HP:930.10G:930.04G:929.83LP:929.31G:929.83G:930.04G:930.10G:930.19HP:930.35HP:930.35G:930.19G:930.10G:930.04G:929.83LP:929.31G:929.83G:930.04HP:930.10HP:930.10G:930.04LP:928.43G:929.31G:929.61G:929.81G:929.95G:930.66HP:931.00G:930.78ME:930.21G:931.07G:930.89G:930.64HP:930.75G:930.67G:930.54G:930.82G:930.58G:930.58LP:930.46G:931.70G:932.04G:932.27G:931.99G:931.85G:931.94G:932.27G:932.27G:931.99G:931.06G:931.06G:931.25G:931.24G:931.12G:931.12G:931.12G:931.12G:932.09G:931.31G:931.34G:931.76G:931.83G:932.04G:931.21G:930.99G:930.99G:931.43G:931.52G:931.52G:932.09FFE = 932.1ME:930.54G:930.78HP:931.01G:930.66LP:929.53G:930.88G:931.16G:931.68G:932.02LP:930.47LP:931.43LP:930.98G:931.01HP:931.03G:931.01HP:931.48HP:931.45LP:930.98G:931.74HP:932.27931.80931.79931.78931.77G:932.04G:932.04G:932.04G:932.04G:930.55G:929.83G:929.83G:931.33HP:931.81HP:931.93HP:931.44HP:931.56G:931.48LP:930.98HP:931.58HP:931.45FFE = 931.6G:931.42G:931.08G:931.15G:931.10G:931.03G:931.02G:930.88G:930.37G:929.38G:930.60G:930.62G:929.67G:929.65This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:26pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING PLANC400LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNNORTHGRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAINCONNECTION.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.000.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)D1. GRADING OF THE FILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USINGLOW-IMPACT, EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THEUNDERLYING SOILS. A BACKHOE WITH TOOTHED BUCKET SHALL BE USED FOREXCAVATION OF FILTRATION BASINS TO PREVENT COMPACTION OR SMEARINGOF SOILS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY THE UNDERLYING SOILS TO AMINIMUM 18" DEPTH TO REMOVE COMPACTION. THE FIRST LIFT OF ENGINEEREDSOIL SHALL BE MIXED WITH THE UNDERLYING SOILS. LEVELING AND FINALGRADING WITHIN THE CELL MUST BE DONE BY HAND.2. FILTRATION BASINS EXCAVATION SHALL BE HELD 1' ABOVE THE BOTTOM OFTHE BASIN UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS WITH EXPOSED SOILSHAVE BEEN FULLY STABILIZED AND BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE INSTALLED ONTHE CONTRIBUTING AREAS.3. DIVERT UPLAND DRAINAGE AREAS TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM ENTERING THEEXCAVATED CELL OR INTO THE WORK AREA.4. CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID CONTAMINATION OF ENGINEERED SOILS WITHSEDIMENT, IN-SITU, OR TOPSOIL DURING AND AFTER INSTALLATION. MATERIALSMUST BE SEGREGATED.5. INSTALLATION WITH DRY SOIL CONDITIONS IS CRITICAL TO PREVENT SMEARINGAND COMPACTION. SCHEDULE WORK FOR PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER.6. DO NOT LEAVE FILTRATION AREAS AND/OR PERIMETER SLOPE EXPOSEDOVERNIGHT. SECURE THE AREA FROM RISK OF PRECIPITATION DAMAGES ATTHE END OF EVERY WORK DAY. IN THE EVENT OF RAIN, TAKE ACTION TODIVERT STORMWATER AWAY FROM WORK AREA AND TEMPORARILY COVER ALLEXPOSED SOILS WITH FILTER FABRIC OR IMPERMEABLE SHEETING.7. IN THE EVENT THAT THE SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING ORIMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TOINITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTIONPROCESS.8. EXCAVATE SEDIMENT BUILT UP DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER STABILIZATIONOF UPSTREAM AREAS AND BEFORE PLACEMENT OF HYDRAULIC SOILSTABILIZER TYPE SPECIAL.9. STOCKPILING OF MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN PROPOSED FILTRATIONBASINS.10. NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE FILTRATION AREABEFORE OR AFTER IT IS CONSTRUCTED. ONLY SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT WILL BEALLOWED INSIDE OF ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE FOR THE SOLE PURPOSEOF CONSTRUCTION THE FILTRATION BASIN.11. ALL FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE COMPLETEDDURING DRY SOIL CONDITIONS.12. ALL FILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONS.13. NOTIFY NICOLE SODERHOLM, RAMSEY-WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHEDDISTRICT, AT 651-792-7976 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THECONSTRUCTION OF ANY VOLUME REDUCTION BMPS.STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTESUNDERGROUND FILTRATION BASIN WITH24" SAND FILTRATION AND 6" DRAIN TILEPRINSCO HYDROSTOR (HS180) OR APPROVED EQUAL8 ROWS WITH 18 CHAMBERS PER ROWSEE DETAIL ON SHEET C401DRAINTILE IE: 918.48'CHAMBER IE: 920.48'TOP OF CHAMBER: 924.27'TOP OF ROCK: 925.27'100-YR HWL: 925.31'WQV PROVIDED: 17,894 CFTOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED: 27,169 CFCURB & GUTTER BY OTHERSCURB & GUTTER BY OTHERSGREY FOX RD. This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING DETAILS.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:28pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING DETAILSC401LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMN(OCS-1) OUTLETCONTROL STRUCTURE18" OUTLET PIPEIE: 918.43END CAP PER MANUFACTURERTOP CHAMBER: 924.27TOP STONE : 925.27CHAMBER IE : 920.48SAND/DRAINTILE IE: 919.23CONNECT 6" DRAINTILE TOOCS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDEOF WEIR WALL, IE: 918.48TYPICAL SECTION - PRINSCO HYDROSTOR HS18024" DEPTH SAND SHALL MEET MNDOTSPECIFICATION FOR FINE FILTERAGGREGATE PER 3149.J.26" PVC SCHEDULE 40DRAINTILE, SEE DRAINTILEBEDDING DETAILPROVIDE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AROUND PERIMETER OFSTONE AND SAND PER MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTSPROVIDE GEOTEXTILE FABRICAROUND PERIMETER OF STONEAND SAND PER MANUFACTURERREQUIREMENTSSAND TO MEET MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, NO LIMESTONE (ORRECYCLED CONCRETE) MATERIAL IS ALLOWED, BENEATH, BETWEEN ORIMMEDIATELY ON TOP OF THE CHAMBER SYSTEMPRECAST WEIRWALL, TOP WALLEL: 923.68WATER QUALITY VOLUME DEPTH IE: 923.68WQV PROVIDED BELOW 17,894 CF PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 ACCOCOSTR -4RE:932.01IE:927.54 NIE:927.44 WSTR -8RE:930.97IE:927.56 ESTR -9RE:930.73IE:927.05 EIE:926.95 SSTR -6RE:930.60IE:926.72 NIE:926.72 WIE:926.62 SSTR -7RE:930.55IE:925.60 NIE:925.20 NEIE:925.10 WIE:925.60 S39 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%23 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%102 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%84 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%6 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 5:29pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC500LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNUTILITY PLAN NOTES1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OFPROPOSED UTILITIES.2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C1503. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 1504" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PERANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUSTBLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THECITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE ORSTRUCTURE).7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.N THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THESANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEETON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVEMECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AMINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 ORANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFOREBACKFILLING.10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSEDPAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, INGREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIONSTRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEWLINES.13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITYOF ARDEN HILLS AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONOF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THEFIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURSBEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALLBE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIESWHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ORCERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATIONREQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THEINTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED ANDMAINTAINED.21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTIONBLOCKING.NORTHSANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAINGATE VALVEHYDRANTTEEREDUCERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONEGAS MAINSTORM SEWERLEGENDCOSANITARY CLEANOUTCOEXISTING PROPOSEDHYDRANT TYP.8"x8" TEE90° BEND90° BEND8" WATER SERVICECONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MHGREASE TRAPREFERENCE PLANS BY OTHERS8" SANITARY SERVICESANITARY CROSSINGSANITARY INVERT: 927.06'STORM CROWN: 923.10'WATER CROSSINGWATER CROWN: 919.63'STORM INVERT: 921.13'WATER CROSSINGWATER CROWN: 919.10'STORM INVERT: 920.60'SANITARY CROSSINGSANITARY INVERT: 926.26'STORM CROWN: 922.47'GREY FOX RD.CURB & GUTTER BY OTHERSCURB & GUTTER BY OTHERS LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)ABCDEFPROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 AC20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBDDDDDDDDDDDBDDBBBEXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG July 12, 2022 - 11:56am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1PLANNING COMMISSION REVS. 7/12/22 CGMPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSMINIMUM CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED: 47 IN.= (14,849 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE) / 320MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED: 71 IN.MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA REQUIRED: 27,075 SF = 108,299 SF LOT AREA *0.25MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA PROVIDED: 27,162 SFTREE RATIO (BUILDING STORIES: 1)CALIPER INCH: (2-3") (3.5-4") (4.5-6")REQUIRED: 23.5"/ 50% 14.1"/ 30% 9.4"/ 20%PROPOSED: 37.5" 24.5" 9"PERENNIALS/SHRUBS REQUIRED: 2,613 SF = 26,125 SF LANDSCAPE AREA * 0.1PERENNIAL/SHRUBS PROVIDED: 7,381 SFREQUIRED PLANTING ISLANDS: 1,374 SF = 13,734 SF PARKING AREA *0.1PROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 2,281 SF(MINIMUM 150 SF)REQUIRED PLANTING ISLAND TREES: 9 TREES = 9 PLANTING ISLANDS x 1 TREEPROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 9 TREESR.O.W. TREE PLANTING REQUIRED (LEXINGTON): 7 TREES = 1 TREE / 40 LF = 250 L.F. / 40R.O.W. TREE PLANTING PROVIDED (LEXINGTON): 7 TREESR.O.W. TREE PLANTING REQUIRED (GREY FOX): 9 TREES = 1 TREE / 40 LF = 326 L.F. / 40R.O.W. TREE PLANTING PROVIDED (GREY FOX): 9 TREESDIVERSE SELECTION REQUIRED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY, ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY,AND GROUND COVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTSCREENING REQUIRED - LOAD SERVICE: MAY INCLUDE A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING - BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT AHEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED. NATURAL MATERIALS TOACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.SCREENING PROVIDED - LOAD SERVICE: SEE PLANNORTH5HYLVHG/DQGVFDSLQJ3ODQ6XEPLWWHG5HYLVHG/DQGVFDSLQJ3ODQ6XEPLWWHG/G///D//D BEFORE AFTER Added Landscaping Exhibit 5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ5HYLVHG/DQGVFDSLQJ3ODQ6XEPLWWHGRQ LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.)ABCDEFPROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 ACAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBDDDDDDDDDDDBDDEXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG June 01, 2022 - 8:19pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSMINIMUM CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED: 47 IN.= (14,849 BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE) / 320MINIMUM CALIPER INCHES PROVIDED: 71 IN.MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA REQUIRED: 38,115 SF = 108,900 SF LOT AREA *0.35MINIMUM LANDSCAPE LOT AREA PROVIDED: 26,125 SFTREE RATIO (BUILDING STORIES: 1)CALIPER INCH: (2-3") (3.5-4") (4.5-6")REQUIRED: 23.5"/ 50% 14.1"/ 30% 9.4"/ 20%PROPOSED: 37.5" 24.5" 9"PERENNIALS/SHRUBS REQUIRED: 2,613 SF = 26,125 SF LANDSCAPE AREA * 0.1PERENNIAL/SHRUBS PROVIDED: 7,381 SFREQUIRED PLANTING ISLANDS: 1,374 SF = 13,734 SF PARKING AREA *0.1PROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 2,281 SF(MINIMUM 150 SF)REQUIRED PLANTING ISLAND TREES: 9 TREES = 9 PLANTING ISLANDS x 1 TREEPROVIDED PLANTING ISLANDS: 9 TREESR.O.W. TREE PLANTING REQUIRED (LEXINGTON): 7 TREES = 1 TREE / 40 LF = 250 L.F. / 40R.O.W. TREE PLANTING PROVIDED (LEXINGTON): 7 TREESR.O.W. TREE PLANTING REQUIRED (GREY FOX): 9 TREES = 1 TREE / 40 LF = 326 L.F. / 40R.O.W. TREE PLANTING PROVIDED (GREY FOX): 9 TREESDIVERSE SELECTION REQUIRED: FULL COMPLIMENT OF OVERSTORY, ORNAMENTAL, AND EVERGREEN TREES, SHRUBBERY,AND GROUND COVERS PROVIDING YEAR-ROUND COLOR AND INTERESTSCREENING REQUIRED - LOAD SERVICE: MAY INCLUDE A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING - BERMS, SHRUBS TREES AT AHEIGHT AND DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF THE AREA TO BE SCREENED. NATURAL MATERIALS TOACHIEVE 60% OPACITY YEAR ROUND AT MATURITY.SCREENING PROVIDED - LOAD SERVICE: SEE PLANNORTH5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ5HYLHZHGE\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQE\E\E\\\ PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 ACR15.0'R15.0'R8.0'R8.0'R30.0'R30.0'R25.0'R15.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'R8.0'R8.0'R6.0'R8.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R8.0'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC300RETAIL - ARDENHILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY108,900 SF (2.50 AC)BUILDING AREA8,950 SF (8.22% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGPROPOSED MULTI-TENANT PARKING 67 SPACESMULTI-TENANT ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED3 STALLS / 3 STALLSPROPOSED CAR WASH PARKING 10 SPACESCAR WASH ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED1 STALLS / 1 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYRETAIL - ARDEN HILLSTOTAL PROPERTY AREA108,300 SF (2.49 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION600 SF (0.01 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA108,900 SF (2.50 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA96,268 SF (2.21 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA34,412 SF (0.79 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA130,680 SF (3.00 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGB-3 - SERVICE BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKPATCH EXISTING GREY FOX ROAD - FOLLOW CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILSMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSBIKE RACKMONUMENT SIGNB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBVEHICLE CHARGING STATIONABCDEFGHIJKLMNOThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 2:38pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OFVESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS ANDEXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED ASNECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. ASREQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS ANDPROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED INBASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY ENF, DATED05/28/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 2.50 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL &INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITSNECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OROTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTSOF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.AAAAACCDDDDDDAGGFFGGGHHHHHHHLLLLLLMMNBEGREY FOX RD.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.DDDDCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSNORTHOJREFER TO LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENT PLANS BY OTHERSFOR LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENTSKPedestrianAccessRoutes PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 ACR15.0'R15.0'R8.0'R8.0'R30.0'R30.0'R25.0'R15.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'R8.0'R8.0'R6.0'R8.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R1.5'R1.5'R15.0'R8.0'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC300RETAIL - ARDENHILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY108,900 SF (2.50 AC)BUILDING AREA8,950 SF (8.22% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGPROPOSED MULTI-TENANT PARKING 67 SPACESMULTI-TENANT ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED3 STALLS / 3 STALLSPROPOSED CAR WASH PARKING 10 SPACESCAR WASH ADA STALLS REQ'D /PROVIDED1 STALLS / 1 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYRETAIL - ARDEN HILLSTOTAL PROPERTY AREA108,300 SF (2.49 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION600 SF (0.01 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA108,900 SF (2.50 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA96,268 SF (2.21 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA34,412 SF (0.79 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA130,680 SF (3.00 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGB-3 - SERVICE BUSINESSDISTRICTPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 20'ROAD = 50'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 50'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKPATCH EXISTING GREY FOX ROAD - FOLLOW CITY OF ARDEN HILLSSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILSMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSBIKE RACKMONUMENT SIGNB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBVEHICLE CHARGING STATIONABCDEFGHIJKLMNOThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 01, 2022 - 2:38pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OFVESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS ANDEXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED ASNECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. ASREQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS ANDPROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED INBASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY ENF, DATED05/28/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 2.50 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL &INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITSNECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OROTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTSOF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.AAAAACCDDDDDDAGGFFGGGHHHHHHHLLLLLLMMNBEGREY FOX RD.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE PAVEMENT PER CITY OFARDEN HILLS STANDARDS. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION.DDDDCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSCURB & GUTTER FROM OTHERSNORTHOJREFER TO LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENT PLANS BY OTHERSFOR LEXINGTON AVENUEIMPROVEMENTSKSnow Storage AreaSnow Storage Area PROPOSEDRETAIL BUILDING±8,950 SFLOT 21.62 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKING20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKPROPOSEDCAR WASHLOT 10.87 AC20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACK4.8717.6733.83feetLock to Lock TimeSteering AngleWidthTrack6.045.0::8.008.46::PREPARED FORTRUCK TURNINGMOVEMENTEX001LAUNCH RETAIL -ARDEN HILLSLAUNCHPROPERTIESARDEN HILLSMNThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\LAUNCH PROPERTIES\ARDEN HILLS\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\Truck Turning\EX-1 TRUCK TURNING.dwg July 13, 2022 - 12:07pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1PLANNING COMMISSION REVS. 7/12/22 CGMNORTH Master Sign PlanProposed RedevelopmentNWC Grey Fox Road & Lexington Ave.+/- 2.50 acres: Guided Commercial 2040 Land Use PlanDeveloped by: Launch Properties, Inc. (“Master Developer”)Concept rendering$WWDFKPHQW* Master Sign Plan & Policy Monument Sign The development shall have one monument sign to be shared by a private agreement between the Master Developer and Tenants. The Tenants shall be allowed space in the sign panel area of the Monument sign. The monument shall be strategically placed per a municipally approved Landscape Plan in an approximate location shown attached on (Exhibit A) on the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. The monument sign may be smaller based on economic conditions and demand at the sole discretion of the Master Developer but, may not be larger. In the event the monument sign is smaller than shown on Exhibit B, it shall retain a similar style and structure. Building Signs All building signs must meet Municipal Code except that all signs must be LED-lit. Buildings may utilize raceways or attach individually lit letters directly to the building in their sign area. Buildings may use logos as part of their signs, so long as their signs conform to Municipal Code. Buildings may use any color for their signs. Signs may not emit noise, nor shall they flash or change color. All banners and temporary signs must meet and follow Municipal Code. Directional Signs Each individual lot may use directional signs per Municipal Code, except that all signs must be LED-lit and remain within each individual lot for which they are intended. Contact: Dan Regan, principal: Launch Properties 612-987-9966 dregan@launchproperties.com EXHIBIT AExhibit A page 1 of 2Lexington AveGrey Fox Road EXHIBIT BExhibit Bpage 1 of 1 Exhibit A page 2 of 2 3,069 SFDENTAL3,508 SFRESTAURANT2,210 SFBANKMONUMENT SIGNGREY FOX ROADLEXINGTON AVE. N.LOT 1 = ±1.63 AC15' PARKING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK50' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK50' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACKEXISTING BACK OF CURBPROPOSED CURBPATIOLOT 2 = ±0.87 ACCARWASH130' TUNNEL10171610168250.0' 180.0'365.6'435.6'115.9'90.4'58.8'64.9'46.0'60.5'58.8' 23.5' 23.0'18.9'16.5' 12.0'16.5'9.0'12.0' 12.0'28.0'24.0'18.0'13.0'30.0'18.0'13.0'28.0'8.5'8.4'11.5'11.5'11.0'18.0'38.0'18.0'SHEET NO.DRAWNBY:DATE:NORTHCONCEPTUALSITE PLANLAUNCH - ARDEN HILLSPREPARED FOR: LAUNCH PROPERTIESACL4/18/2022EX-138333833333838338833838833838383838.000000000000'3888880 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϮ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( 6):$//6,*1',63/$< 6&$/( µ ·µ ¶´ ¶ó´ ¶ò´ ¶ô ´´ ¶ó´´ ´ %/$&. 35(),1,6+(' ,1&+/(77(5&2,/ :+,7( 35(),1,6+(' $/80,180 $/80 :+,7( µ -(:(/,7( µ%/$&. +$1/(<:+,7(/('·V /(77(56 $5( 72 %( 02817(' 72 )$6&,$ 86,1* 3523(5+$5':$5( $1' )$67(1(56 121&25526,9( 5(78516 %$&.6 )$&(6 75,0&$3 ,//80,1$7,21 ,167$//$7,21 /(77(563(&,),&$7,216 %/$&. 35(),1,6+(' ,1&+/(77(5&2,/ :+,7( 35(),1,6+(' $/80,180 $/80 :+,7( µ -(:(/,7( µ%/$&. +$1/(<:+,7(/('·V 5(78516 %$&.6 )$&(6 75,0&$3 ,//80,1$7,21 ,167$//$7,21 /(77(563(&,),&$7,216 /(77(56 $5( 72 %( 02817(' 72 $1$/80,180 :,5(:$< 3$,17(' %/$&. 6,*1$*( ,6 72 %( 02817(' 72 )$6&,$ 86,1* 3523(5+$5':$5( $1' )$67(1(56 121&25526,9( 6FDOH µ · $OO*UDSKLFVWREH WUDQVOXFHQWGLJLWDOSULQWV $OO*UDSKLFVWREH WUDQVOXFHQWGLJLWDOSULQWV 4W\ 6HW6,*1 ϮϱϲϬϱ 7'-4"134'-0"22'-4 7/8"18'-3 1/8"4'-8"39'-0"36'-0"57'-8"8'-8"45'-4"141'-4"2,846 SFWash Tunnel100263 SFOffice107101 SFConference10673 SFStaff RR105131 SFLaundry1041,139 SFEquipment Room101275 SFMembers Room10287 SFRestroom10302020403040403010204040524'-4"16'-4"4'-8"45'-4"5RFNHW&DUZDVK$UGHQ+LOOVSchematic Floor Plan06/02/22A11/8" = 1'-0"A11FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN NOTESMARK DESCRIPTION01 VACUUM STATION02 CANOPY OVERHEAD03 BUILDING OFFSET GREATER THAN 4'-0" IN DEPTH04 COLOR/MATERIAL CHANGE05 TOTAL BUILDING SQFT = 5640 sqft134'-0"36'-0"57'-8"8'-8"141'-4"2,88846 SFWash Thhunnel1001,139 SFEquipment Room101275 SFMembers Room10203040300010405224'-4"16'-4"4'-8"45'-4"MARKDDDDDDDDDEEESSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCRIPPPPPPTTTTTTTIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNN01 VACUUM STATION02 CANOPY OVERHEAD033333003333300003333BBBBUBUUBBBBUUBUBUUBBUUUUUILILILDIDDIDDDDIDDDDDINNNNNGNNNNNGGNGNNNGGOOOFFFFFFSESSEEEESESSSEEEESESSEETTT GRGRGREAAAAEAAAAAEAAAATTTETTR THAN 4'-0" IN DEPTH0000040000COCCOOOOOOLLLLLOLLLLLOLLLLLOOLLLLLOORR///RR/MMMAAAATTTTETERRRIIIRRIIALAAALCCCCCHHHAAAHAAANNGGNNNE000005050000550000555500555555555TOTTTTOOOOTTTTOOOOTTOTTOOOOOOOOOTTOOOTATATAAAAATATAAAAATATTTALLLLLLLLLLLL LLL BBBBBUBBBBBUILILLLILLILDIDIDIDINGGGGNNNGGGGNNNGNNNGSSSSSQQQQQFFFFFQQQQFFFTTTTTT TT= 5640 sqft 6,*1 )DEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO 6HW(DFK)&21RQ,OOXPLQDWHG/HWWHUV6FDOH µ · )520ôµ$/80,180 3$,17(':+,7( 0$7(5,$/ 3$,17),1,6+ ,167$//$7,21 /(77(56$5(72%(678'02817('72)$6&,$,1 &86720(563(&,),('/2&$7,21 121,//80,1$7(')&2/(77(56 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϯ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( ϮϱϲϬϱ )DEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO (DFK6)1RQ,OOXPLQDWHG0RQXPHQW6FDOH µ· ,//80,1$7,21 ,167$//$7,21 6):$//6,*1',63/$< ,17(5,25)5$0( &$%,1(7&2/25 )$&(0$7(5,$/ )$&(*5$3+,&6 µ$1*/(,521)5$0( $/80,180 $33/,('9,1</*5$3+,&6$6127(' 1$ $/80,1803$,17('%/$&. ,QVWDOODWLRQ )OXVKPRXQWRQ%ULFNWUDVKHQFORVXUH 5HG %ODFN 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϲ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( 6LGH9LHZ ϮϱϲϬϱ ´ 6,*1D 6,*1E 6,*1F )URQW6LGH (17(5 81/,0,7('0(0%(56+,36 67$57,1*$7 $0217+ TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT 66666666666666666,****************************111111111111111111111111111DDDDDDDD 66666666666666666,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,***********************11111111111111111111111111111111111111EEEEEEEEE EXAMPLE OF DIRECTIONAL SIGN 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϳ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( )DEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO (DFK)URQW,OOXPLQDWHG&KDQQHOV6FDOH µ· ,OOXPLQDWHG&KDQQHO&DELQHWV 3UH)LQLVKHG%ODFN,1&+/(77(5&2,/ :+,7( 35(),1,6+(' $/80,180 $/80 :+,7( µ µ-(:(/,7( %ODFN *(0;::+,7(/('·V /(77(563(&,),&$7,216 5(78516 %$&.6 )$&(6 75,0&$3 ,//80,1$7,21 ,167$//$7,21 ´´ ([WUD)DFH ([WUD)DFH )LHOG9HULI\ 5HG 6,*16,*1 6,*1 ϮϱϲϬϱ 6FDOH µ · 6,*1 )DEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO )URQW,OOXPLQDWHG5:0RXQWHG&KDQQHO/HWWHUV6FDOH µ · 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϵ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( ϮϱϲϬϱ 6FDOH µ · 7UR\3DQDJLRWLV ϭϮϴϵϯϵͲϰ 6KHUL&KLPHO WKDQG6WRQH\EURRN 2PDKD1( 6,*1 6FDOH µ · )DEULFDWHDQGLQVWDOO )URQW,OOXPLQDWHG5:0RXQWHG&KDQQHO/HWWHUV6FDOH µ · ϮϱϲϬϱ ¶´666666666666FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFDDDDDDDDDDDDDOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH µ · 0.00.10.30.70.90.90.60.30.10.10.10.20.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.30.40.40.50.60.70.60.60.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.70.80.70.70.60.50.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.81.11.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.01.11.3 1.3 1.31.11.0 0.9 1.01.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.10.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.31.51.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.91.11.2 1.31.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.71.9 1.9 1.81.7 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.51.6 1.61.71.61.5 1.5 1.41.31.41.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.21.71.9 1.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.81.1 1.4 1.72.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.81.71.8 2.1 2.1 1.91.7 1.71.8 1.8 1.61.41.21.10.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.9 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.1 3.8 4.9 3.7 2.21.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.72.0 2.7 3.6 4.3 4.2 3.5 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.01.7 1.5 1.4 1.10.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.91.73.6 3.5 3.94.1 5.16.35.54.3 3.2 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 3.2 4.3 4.8 4.8 4.3 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.8 5.65.4 5.5 4.56.57.17.3 5.9 4.8 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.9 3.2 3.9 5.3 6.4 6.3 5.2 4.0 3.6 4.0 4.6 4.9 4.85.15.34.44.13.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.9 4.94.13.7 3.0 2.21.40.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.71.13.3 6.5 5.6 5.3 3.9 6.0 11.814.19.81.52.2 2.7 3.2 3.4 3.7 4.9 7.0 8.9 8.6 6.6 4.9 4.3 5.0 5.9 5.8 6.27.17.3 6.0 4.9 4.94.5 4.44.8 4.8 5.6 6.9 6.9 5.6 4.6 4.0 2.8 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 2.9 7.0 6.4 6.0 3.1 0.9 1.0 2.3 3.1 3.44.15.4 7.79.6 9.3 7.25.44.95.56.4 6.1 6.7 8.4 8.9 6.7 5.25.14.7 4.75.2 5.0 6.3 8.6 8.7 6.4 4.94.43.11.70.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 4.315.416.115.75.8 0.61.11.8 2.5 3.2 4.25.57.6 9.0 8.7 7.25.75.05.45.9 5.8 6.0 6.7 6.65.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.7 4.7 5.56.7 6.8 5.6 4.6 4.0 2.91.70.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 4.215.716.9 16.5 6.1 0.5 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.85.57.6 8.9 8.87.4 5.54.6 4.6 4.9 5.04.74.84.74.0 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.74.14.8 5.0 4.3 3.8 3.2 2.41.50.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.21.54.3 4.8 4.8 2.1 0.3 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.85.57.6 8.9 8.87.5 5.5 4.54.3 4.2 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.11.40.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 2.6 2.4 2.51.50.3 1.3 2.0 2.6 3.14.15.57.6 9.1 8.8 7.3 5.6 4.8 4.3 3.9 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.91.40.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.8 4.0 3.3 3.01.70.4 1.3 2.1 2.9 3.34.15.6 8.0 10.1 9.67.55.6 4.6 4.2 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.81.71.8 2.0 2.1 1.81.71.8 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.4 5.2 4.0 3.5 1.9 0.5 1.2 2.1 2.9 3.4 4.0 5.6 8.0 10.1 9.67.5 5.5 4.44.0 3.6 2.9 1.91.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.72.3 2.7 2.2 1.81.51.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.0 4.6 3.9 3.6 2.0 0.5 1.3 2.0 2.7 3.2 4.0 5.3 7.3 8.6 8.4 6.9 5.24.13.5 3.2 1.91.50.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.01.1 1.11.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 3.5 3.6 3.8 2.3 0.6 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.8 5.3 7.3 8.4 8.2 7.0 4.9 3.6 3.0 2.30.5 0.5 0.4 0.41.72.4 2.5 2.7 1.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 2.6 3.2 3.5 2.2 0.5 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.75.5 7.58.9 8.6 6.9 4.8 3.4 2.7 2.21.6 2.6 3.7 4.0 2.3 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 2.4 3.2 3.5 2.2 0.3 1.2 1.9 2.5 3.0 3.9 5.2 7.2 8.4 8.1 6.64.73.5 2.8 2.31.73.1 5.2 5.8 3.01.40.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.8 3.2 3.5 2.2 0.41.11.8 2.6 3.0 3.8 5.2 7.3 8.9 8.2 6.54.53.4 2.7 2.31.8 3.1 5.3 5.9 3.11.50.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.2 4.0 3.7 3.6 2.2 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.5 2.9 3.6 5.27.49.9 8.8 6.74.43.1 2.6 2.31.6 2.6 3.94.12.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 2.6 5.84.7 4.42.95.711.713.6 7.8 2.0 0.9 2.0 2.4 3.2 3.8 4.9 6.8 8.27.76.24.53.6 3.0 2.21.72.4 2.7 2.8 1.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.71.13.1 6.15.14.9 3.9 6.67.77.9 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.84.14.55.6 6.97.7 7.56.5 5.2 4.2 3.9 3.83.0 3.4 2.9 2.8 2.2 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.71.12.2 4.84.74.9 4.8 5.3 6.4 6.2 5.24.53.1 3.0 4.3 4.6 4.9 6.1 7.3 7.87.46.8 5.64.7 4.5 4.43.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.61.10.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.81.53.1 3.3 3.7 3.8 4.3 5.2 4.6 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.74.56.07.5 7.56.4 5.24.53.8 3.6 3.4 3.54.14.53.9 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.64.43.6 2.6 2.11.71.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.2 4.3 3.5 2.01.5 1.5 1.72.0 2.4 3.3 5.0 6.5 5.9 4.2 3.2 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.6 3.9 4.9 4.0 2.31.51.31.11.21.42.2 3.95.44.8 3.1 2.01.5 1.10.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.6 1.61.10.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.91.1 1.11.21.5 1.5 1.41.21.11.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.81.1 1.10.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0BUILDING LIGHTING NOT INCLUDEDBY ARCHITECT IF NEEDEDPLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED ELEVATIONSBUILDING ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING NOT INCLUDEDBY ARCHITECT IF NEEDEDPLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED ELEVATIONSRECOMMENDED PARALLEL TO WALLMIN. PARALLEL TO WALLRECOMMENDED PERP TO WALLMIN. PERP TO WALLMIN. BETWEEN RACKSRECOMMENDED BETWEEN RACKS HARDSCAPENO PARKINGNO PARKINGRECOMMENDED PARALLEL TO WALLMIN. PARALLEL TO WALLRECOMMENDED PERP TO WALLMIN. PERP TO WALLMIN. BETWEEN RACKSRECOMMENDED BETWEEN RACKS HARDSCAPE0.00000000000000.000000000000000.0000000000.0000000000.0000000000000000000.0000000000.0000111110.000033333333300.000000055555550.0000555550.0000444440.00003333333333330.0000000111111100000.00001111110.000000000000000.0000001111111110.00001111111100.000111111100.00000000000000.0000000001111111110.000000000000000.0000000000000000.0000000000.00000000000.0000111110.0000000000.000000000000.0000000000.0000000000.00000000000.0000000000.0000000000.00000000000000.000000000.0000000000.0.00.00.000000..000.00.00.00.00000000000000000000.00.10.110.000.0.000.0.00.0..0.00.0.22222222222222220.20.20.22220.00.00.0.0.0.0.0..0..0...111111111111110.000000.0.0.0.0.000.000000000000000..0.0.0.00.0.0.0.0.0000000000000000000.000.0.00.0.0.0.0..0.000000000000000.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.00.0.00.0.00000000000000000.0.0.0.0..0..0.000000000000000000000.0.0.0.0.00.00.0.0..0.0.0.000000000.0.00.00.0.000.00.0.0..0.00000000000000000.0.0.0.00.0.0.000.0000000000000000.0000.0.0.0.0....00.0.0..000000000000.000000000000000000000000000000.00.00.0.000.000.0.000..00000000000000000000.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.0.00.000.0.00.0.0.000.000.00...0000000.0.0.0.00.0.0.00.0000.00.00.000000.00000000000000.0000000000000000000.0000000000000000000000000.00.00.10.3330000.00000999999999111.1111111111131.30.90.30.0000000000020.20.20.2222220.30.00000000040...5550.50.555555555555550.50000.00000006666666660.60.000.00.0.00.0.0.0.0.0....00000000000.00.000.0.0.0.000.0.0.0.0.0.00.0.00000000000000.0000.0.00..0.0.0.0..000000000000000.0.00000000000000000.000000.001110.002222220.0000.000...00.....88888888881.1.11.1.11........1111.111110.008880.003330.0000000001110.001110.001110.0.00..222220.002220.0.00.0.00.0.00.00..000.022222222222222220...002220.002220.0.0.0..0...0.00...0..0.0..22222222222222220.002220.0000..00......222222222222220.002220.0.0.0.......0.0.00000000000000000000.00.00.00.00.10.220.0.00.00.0..0.0.....0..6666660.80.80.60.400.000.000.00.0.00000.011111111111111111110.10.10..........1111111111111111110.10.0.0.0..0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0...11111111111110...10.10.0.0....000.0.0.0.00.0.0..111111111111111111111000.0.0.0.000.0.0000100..00.0.0.0.000.0.000.0.1111111111111111100.0000000001Attachment H Due to the changes of constant improvement in LED technology, all details are subject to change without notice. Consult factory for up to date information. www.iuseelite.com REFLECTOR COLORS FLANGE COLORS EMERGENCY LUMENS DIMMING CCT & DYNAMIC PLATFORMS COLOR QUALITY CRI LIFETIME DISTRIBUTIONS TRIM OPTIONS PHOTOMETRIC TESTS * Only Available on 85+ CRI ND: NarrowMD: MediumWD: Wide Candlepower Distribution Curve Candlepower Distribution Curve Candlepower Distribution Curve Based on 4000K, 90+CRI with semi-specular chrome reflector. Actual wattage may vary +/-5% Reference IES files for additional distribution curve information. RS190627/NS190711/ BB190711 900, 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000* 1 (Custom lumen packages available) CL (Semi-Specular Chrome), SHZ (Low Iridescent Satin Haze), WT (Wheat), W (White), MB (Black)#; #SPO[F Self-Flanged WH (White), SCH (Semi-Specular Chrome), SHZ (Low Iridescent Satin Haze), BK (Black) #; #SPO[F 10W - Up to 1000L Output 20W - Up to 2000L Output &.(-&%(84%54FMG%JBHOPTUJD $POTVMU'BDUPSZ 0-10V Flicker Free 1% Dimming Standard (DIM10), LUTH, LUTFTB, LUT2W, ELDO10.1, ELDODMX.1, ELDODALI.1, DIMTR , 27K, 30K, 35K, 40K, 50K, Tunable White, Dims to Warm, RGB + White 2 Step MacAdam Ellipse 90+ Standard, 98+ Optional L70 at 102,000 Hours WD (Wide Distribution), MD (Medium Distribution) and ND (Narrow Distribution) Downlight, Wall Wash, Double Wall Wash, Wet Location In Accordance with IES LM79-08, LM80 and TM-30, TM-21 FEATURES A highly sustainable and ultra-efficient architectural LED downlight that provides even, glare-free illumination. Available in a range of finishes, distributions, and lumen packages, it is ideally suited for use in corporate office space, hospitality, healthcare, commercial, academic, churches and retail. OPTICS AND REFLECTOR The reflector has a 45o visual cutoff, and is shipped standard with a Solite lens in a smooth frosted finish. Spun from 0.05” thick aluminum, with a 1-step anodized finish, and available in different colors or custom RAL finishes. Reflector flange options include self-flanged and white painted flange. Various distribution options are available, and all optics are field changeable. By Elite Lighting 4” Architectural High Lumen LED Downlight HH4-LED 4” NOMINAL LUMENS DELIVERED LUMENS WATTAGE 3000 3394 32W 2000 2144 26W 1500 1699 20W 1200 1341 16W 900 995 12W A: Height = 5-3/4” B: Trim Aperture = 4” C: Cut-Out = 4-1/2” D: Trim Outside Dia = 5-3/8” E: Width = 16” F: Length = 12-1/2” F E HH4-TL-4501 6TKONGUU&QYPNKIJV HH4-TL-4507 6TKONGUU9CNN9CUJ HH4-4501 (NCPIGF&QYPNKIJV HH4-4507 (NCPIGF9CNN9CUJ HH4-4577 (NCPIGF&QWDNG9CNN9CUJ 1 3000 Lumens is not ENERGY STAR certified HH4-45:+ 2QN[ECTDQPCVG CL-WH WT-WH W-WHBZ-BK BZ-BZ WT-WT MB-WH REFLECTOR/FLANGE COLORSCL-SCH CL-BK SHZ-WH CL-BZ SHZ WH SHZ-BK SHZ-SHZ MB-BK Due to the changes of constant improvement in LED technology, all details are subject to change without notice. Consult factory for up to date information. www.iuseelite.com LED DYNAMIC PLATFORM OPTIONS Tunable White with Smart White Technology utilizing the Lumenetix Platform allows you to color tune the luminaire via various controls. Create the perfect environment for the desired use of the space, while maintaining a CRI of 90+ across the tunable range of 8000 to 1650K. (Click here for more details) Dims to Warm with Smart Dimming Technology. At 100% full brightness the luminaire is at 3000K. When dimmed to 1%, the light transitions to 1800K, creating a warm ambiance within the space. (Click here for more details) RGB+White with Smart Hue Technology provides full color mixing of RGB and white colors. Utilizing the Lumenetix Platform allows you to choose from unlimited RGB color options, via various controls. Ideal for Circadian Rhythm applications or to create the perfect human centric environment. (Click here for more details) WARRANTY Five-year warranty for parts and components. (Labor not included) LISTINGS c-UL-us - Listed for Wet Location if used with HH4-4501 Trim. c-UL-us - Listed for Feed Through Wiring. U.S Patent No. - D685,118S CP-City of Chicago Environmental Air (CCEA) marking for plenum applications. Energy Star and California Title 24 compliant Optional Black color trim is not ENERGYSTAR certified and won’t meet the requirement. THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Passive cooling Diecast Aluminum Heat Sink, LED light engine and driver are replaceable, upgradeable, and can be accessed from below the ceiling. The consistency in the quality of light is delivered with precision performance by the use of a unique locking mechanism that aligns the reflector with the light engine. MOUNTING FRAME & BRACKETS The downlight mounting frame is a fabricated assembly constructed of 16-gauge steel, with C-channel mounting brackets, included. The versatility of the mounting brackets allow for an adjustability of up to 28” horizontally, and 2-3/4” vertically, locking into place. With the added die-formed construction of the mounting frame, it provides maximum heat dissipation and rust protection. DRIVER ELECTRICAL INFORMATION The LED driver is rated for 50 to 60Hz at 120V/277V, also available in 347V input, produces less than 20%THD, has a power factor between 90% and 100%, and is thermally protected for additional safety. Junction box and Driver can be accessed from below the ceiling and above the ceiling. Junction Box is Listed for through branch circuit wiring. DIMMING & DRIVER INFORMATION DIM10 - 0-10V dimming on either MVOLT 120, 277 or 347V. Dimmable down to 1% of initial lumens, standard. DIMTR - Triac & Electronic low voltage dimming. Available in 120V, and up to 3000 lumens only. LUT2W - Lutron LTEA2W Hi-Lume 1%. 2-wire LED Driver Forward Phase Control, 1% dimming in 120V only. LUTH - Lutron LDE1 Hi-Lume Eco System. 1% dimming with Soft in Fade to Black dimming technology. LUTFB - Lutron PEQ0 Hi-Lume Premier Eco System. 0.1% dimming with Soft in Fade to Black dimming technology. Available on all luminaires up to 20 watts. ELDO10.1 - EldoLED SoloDrive 0-10V. Dimming down to 0.1%. DALI - DALI DT6, DT8 dimming down to 1%. ELDODMX - EldoLED PowerDrive dimming down to 0.1%. Please see EldoLED website for wiring diagrams and a list of compatible DMX and DALI control systems. By Elite Lighting HH4-LED 4” Architectural High Lumen LED Downlight 4” Example: HH4-LED-2000L-DIM10-MVOLT-MD-40K-90-HH4-4501-CL-WH SERIES LUMENS DRIVER VOLTAGE CCT EMERGENCY TRIM TYPE REFLECTOR/FLANGE COLORS HH4-LED R 900L R 1200L R 1500L R 2000L R 3000L* 5 R DIM10 R DIMTR 1 R LUTH 2 R LUT2W 1 R LUTFTB 6 R ELDO10-.1 2 R ELDODALI-.1 2 R ELDODMX-.1 2 R 120 R 277 R MVOLT R 347 (DIM10 only) R 22K R 27K R 30K R 35K R 40K R 50K 3 R HH4-4501 Flanged Downlight R HH4-4507 Flanged Wall Wash R HH4-4577 Flanged Double Wall Wash R 4 Polycarbonate “Dead Front” Trim with Tempered Albalite Lens R CL-WH R CL-SCH R CL-BK R CL-BZ R SHZ-WH R SHZ-SHZ R SHZ-BK R WT-WH R WT-WT R CL R MB R SHZ R WH R W-WH R MB-WH* R MB-BK* R BZ-BK R BZ-BZ * Black color trim is not ENERGYSTAR certified R WH R SCH R BKRBZ R SHZOPTICS CRI OPTIONS R WD R MD R ND R 90+ R 98+4 R CP (Chicago Plenum) TRIMLESS R HH4-TL-4501 Trimless Downlight R HH4-TL-4507 Trimless Wall Wash 1 DIMTR and LUT2W are available in 120V only 2 LUTH, ELDO10-.1, ELDODALI-.1, and ELDODMX-.1 are available in 120V and 277V 3 50K series are available with 85+ CRI only 4 98+ CRI is available in 27K, 30K and 40K only 5 3000 Lumens is not energy Star certified 6 LUTFTB Available for luminaires up to 1500L * Only Available on 85+ CRI -Reference last page for Control Options Typical lumen output of the luminaire is up to 1000L with EMG-LED-10W option & 2000L with EMG-LED-20W option in emergency mode. Contact the factory for details. Remote mounted installation *Consult Factory for Self Diagnostic R EMG-LED-10W R EMG-LED-20W R R R EMG-LED-G2-10W-SDT* TRIMLESS FINISH FLANGE COLORS Due to the changes of constant improvement in LED technology, all details are subject to change without notice. Consult factory for up to date information. www.iuseelite.com By Elite Lighting 4”4” Architectural High Lumen LED Downlight HH4-LED HH4-LED-3000L-DIM10-MVOLT-ND-40K-80-HH4-4501-CL-WH TEST NO.: EL011931 INPUT WATTS: 32.5 LUMENS: 3394 CRI: 80 EFFICACY: 104 CCT: 4000K SPACING CRITERIA: 0.68 Candle Power Distribution (Candelas) RC - Ceiling Cavity Reflectance RW - Wall ReflectanceROOM CAVITY RATIOCoefficients of Utilization - Zonal Cavity Method Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance 0.20 Zonal Lumens Summary 0 Candela TabulationLumens Per Zone Zone Lumens 0-10 556.52 10-20 1145.42 20-30 967.26 30-40 443.68 40-50 204.13 50-60 54.35 60-70 16.67 70-80 4.26 80-90 1.98 Luminance (Average candela/M2) Angle in Degrees Average 0º Average 45º Average 90º 45 36201 40313 59400 55 7212 13319 15011 65 2565 3279 7949 75 1244 1870 2395 85 519 3765 4487 0 6170.90 5 6260.87 15 4115.63 25 2139.08 35 507.54 45 203.59 55 32.90 65 8.62 75 2.56 85 0.36 90 0.11 RC 80% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% RW 70% 50% 30% 10% 70% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0 119 119 119 119 116 116 116 116 111 111 111 106 106 106 102 102 102 100 1 114 111 109 107 111 109 107 105 105 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 94 2 109 104 100 97 106 102 99 96 99 96 94 96 94 92 93 92 90 88 3 104 98 93 89 102 96 92 89 94 90 87 91 88 86 89 87 85 83 4 999287 83 979186 82 8985 81 8783 80 8582 80 78 5 948781 77 938681 77 8480 76 8279 76 8178 75 74 6 908277 73 898176 72 8075 72 7874 71 7774 71 70 7 867872 68 857772 68 7671 68 7571 67 7470 67 66 8 837468 65 827368 65 7268 64 7167 64 7067 64 62 9 797065 61 787065 61 6964 61 6864 61 6763 61 59 10 76 67 62 58 75 67 62 58 66 61 58 65 61 58 65 61 58 57 Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fixt 0-20 1701.94 50.10 50.10 0-30 2669.2 78.60 78.60 0-40 3112.88 91.70 91.70 0-60 3371.36 99.30 99.30 0-80 3392.3 99.90 99.90 0-90 3394.27 100.00 100.00 1570 3139 4709 6279 90º 80º 70º 60º 50º 40º 30º 20º 10º Cone of Light BEAM DIA. MEASURED AT 50% OF NADIR F.C. (FT.)Distance to Plane (FC.) Initial Footcandle at Nadir (FT.) Beam Vert. Spread (FT.) Beam Horiz. Spread 2 1543 1.4 1.4 4 386 2.8 2.7 6 171 4.2 4.1 8 96.4 5.6 5.5 10 61.7 7 6.8 12 42.9 8.5 8.2 HH4-LED-3000L-DIM10-MVOLT-MD-40K-80-HH4-4501-CL-WH TEST NO.: EL011930 INPUT WATTS: 32.5 LUMENS: 3219 CRI: 80 EFFICACY: 99 CCT: 4000K SPACING CRITERIA: 0.80 Candle Power Distribution (Candelas) RC - Ceiling Cavity Reflectance RW - Wall ReflectanceROOM CAVITY RATIOCoefficients of Utilization - Zonal Cavity Method Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance 0.20 Zonal Lumens Summary 0 Candela TabulationLumens Per Zone Zone Lumens 0-10 381.93 10-20 943.57 20-30 972.99 30-40 574.56 40-50 260.76 50-60 61.61 60-70 17.62 70-80 4.23 80-90 1.87 Luminance (Average candela/M2) Angle in Degrees Average 0º Average 45º Average 90º 45 43102 49739 69914 55 7569 15134 16416 65 2562 3323 8571 75 1248 1861 2322 85 519 3433 4068 0 4152.88 5 4102.36 15 3431.97 25 2073.84 35 760.44 45 242.40 55 34.53 65 8.61 75 2.57 85 0.36 90 0.12 RC 80% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% RW 70% 50% 30% 10% 70% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0 119 119 119 119 116 116 116 116 111 111 111 106 106 106 102 102 102 100 1 113 111 108 106 111 109 106 104 105 103 101 101 99 98 97 96 95 93 2 108 103 99 96 106 101 98 94 98 95 92 95 93 90 92 90 89 87 3 102 96 91 87 100 95 90 86 92 88 85 90 86 84 87 85 82 81 4 979084 80 958983 79 8682 79 8481 78 8379 77 75 5 928478 74 918378 74 8177 73 8076 72 7875 72 70 6 887973 69 867873 68 7772 68 7571 68 7470 67 66 7 847468 64 827468 64 7267 64 7167 63 7066 63 62 8 807064 60 787064 60 6863 60 6763 59 6662 59 58 9 766660 56 756660 56 6560 56 6459 56 6359 56 54 10 72 63 57 53 71 62 57 53 62 57 53 61 56 53 60 56 53 51 Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fixt 0-20 1325.49 41.20 41.20 0-30 2298.48 71.40 71.40 0-40 2873.04 89.20 89.20 0-60 3195.41 99.30 99.30 0-80 3217.25 99.90 99.90 0-90 3219.12 100.00 100.00 1038 2076 3115 4153 90º 80º 70º 60º 50º 40º 30º 20º 10º Cone of Light BEAM DIA. MEASURED AT 50% OF NADIR F.C. (FT.)Distance to Plane (FC.) Initial Footcandle at Nadir (FT.) Beam Vert. Spread (FT.) Beam Horiz. Spread 2 1038 1.9 1.9 4 260 3.9 3.8 6 115 5.8 5.7 8 64.9 7.7 7.6 10 41.5 9.6 9.5 12 28.8 11.6 11.4 HH4-LED-3000L-DIM10-MVOLT-WD-40K-80-HH4-4501-CL-WH TEST NO.: EL011929 INPUT WATTS: 32.6 LUMENS: 2945 CRI: 80 EFFICACY: 90 CCT: 4000K SPACING CRITERIA: 1.04 Candle Power Distribution (Candelas) RC - Ceiling Cavity Reflectance RW - Wall ReflectanceROOM CAVITY RATIOCoefficients of Utilization - Zonal Cavity Method Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance 0.20 Zonal Lumens Summary 0 Candela TabulationLumens Per Zone Zone Lumens 0-10 216.98 10-20 631.22 20-30 875.76 30-40 746.78 40-50 365.81 50-60 81.17 60-70 21.33 70-80 4.50 80-90 1.80 Luminance (Average candela/M2) Angle in Degrees Average 0º Average 45º Average 90º 45 62264 77268 86719 55 9027 20993 21528 65 2782 3695 10901 75 1307 1880 2303 85 548 3073 3607 0 2266.06 5 2267.18 15 2253.87 25 1927.37 35 1137.92 45 350.17 55 41.18 65 9.35 75 2.69 85 0.38 90 0.14 RC 80% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% RW 70% 50% 30% 10% 70% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0 119 119 119 119 116 116 116 116 111 111 111 106 106 106 102 102 102 100 1 113 110 107 105 110 108 105 103 104 102 100 100 98 97 96 95 94 92 2 107 101 97 93 104 100 96 92 96 93 90 93 91 88 90 88 86 85 3 101 93 88 84 98 92 87 83 89 85 82 87 83 80 85 82 79 77 4 958680 76 938580 75 8378 74 8177 73 7975 72 71 5 898074 69 877973 68 7772 68 7571 67 7470 67 65 6 847468 63 827367 63 7266 62 7066 62 6965 61 60 7 796962 58 786862 58 6761 57 6661 57 6560 57 55 8 756458 53 746458 53 6357 53 6256 53 6156 53 51 9 716054 49 706054 49 5953 49 5853 49 5752 49 47 10 67 57 50 46 66 56 50 46 55 50 46 54 49 46 54 49 45 44 Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fixt 0-20 848.20 28.80 28.80 0-30 1723.95 58.50 58.50 0-40 2470.74 83.90 83.90 0-60 2917.72 99.10 99.10 0-80 2943.56 99.90 99.90 0-90 2945.36 100.00 100.00 575 1150 1725 2300 90º 80º 70º 60º 50º 40º 30º 20º 10º Cone of Light BEAM DIA. MEASURED AT 50% OF NADIR F.C. (FT.)Distance to Plane (FC.) Initial Footcandle at Nadir (FT.) Beam Vert. Spread (FT.) Beam Horiz. Spread 2 567 2.7 2.9 4 142 5.4 5.9 6 62.9 8.1 8.8 8 35.4 10.7 11.7 10 22.7 13.4 14.6 12 15.7 16.1 17.6 Due to the changes of constant improvement in LED technology, all details are subject to change without notice. Consult factory for up to date information. www.iuseelite.com 1- Luminaire will be shipped with Powerpacks pre-installed, ready to be integrated to designated contol systems 2- Luminaire will be shipped with Sensors installed on the luminaire, allowing for individual luminaire control. Luminaires will be ready to be integrated with designated control systems 3- Luminaire will be shipped with Sensors to be remotely installed on the ceiling. Luminaires will be ready to be integrated with designated control systems BRAND CONTROL UNIT R LEDRU LED Relay Zone Controller 0-10V 1 R FCJS-010 Lutron Vive 0-10V Individual Pow Pak (Luminare is shipped Vive Enabled) 1 4 R CU-4E-FMH Fixture Mount Control Unit 1 5 R ZL027 –N0W Intellect Power Control Module 1 6 R EN-WCM2-ZB-DR Wireless Control Module 1 7 R SBR -BS Xitanium SR Bridge 1 8 R LMFC-011 ON/OFF/0-10V dimming fixture controller 1 9 R EN- ALC-ZB-BK-DR Wireless Area Lighting Control Module 1 7 R LEDDU LED Zone Controller 0-10V 1 R FCJS-ECO Lutron Vive Eco-system Pow Pak (Luminare is shipped Vive Enabled) 1 4 R ZL027 –N0W Intellect Power Control Module 1 6 R ZBHA-CLM-DIM-ENC Connected Lighting Module DIM 1 7 INTEGRAT SENSOR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *WIRELESS OCCUPANCY SENSOR R EOSCU-W-EO Occupancy Sensor - Ceiling Mounted (Must be specified with LEDRU or LEDDU control unit) 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R LMDC-100 Dual technology PIR Ceiling Mount Occupancy Sensor 3 *WIRELESS DAYLIGHT SENSOR R ELLSU-W-EO Light Level Sensor - Ceiling Mounted (Must be specified with LEDRU or LEDDU control unit) 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R LMLS-400 Single zone switching and dimming digital photosensor 3 *WIRELESS OCCUPANCY & DAYLIGHT SENSOR N/A N/A R SU-5E-IoT IoT Node Micro Sensor 3 R SU-5E-CL Connected Lighting Micro Sensor 3 R SU-5E-IL Independent Lighting / Enlighted One Micro Sensor 3 R SU-5S-H-(IoT/CL/IL) Surface Mount Sensor 3 (Must be specified with CU- 4E-FMH Control Unit) R ZL00J -T0W Intellect Intelligent Fixture Control System 3 (Must be specified with ZL027 –N0W Control Unit) R EN-CLM-PIR-DD-ZB SensiLUM™ Wireless Integrated Sensor R EN-SCPPH-1500-ZB Wireless Passive Infrared Occupancy and Photo Sensors 3 (Must be specified with EN-WCM2-ZB-DR or EN- ALC-ZB-BK-DR Control Unit) R SNS200- CMP SNS200 for grouping 3 N/A ACCESORIES N/A N/A R TMC-SU-5E Tile Mount Carrier R CBL-5E-CU4-30N 30 inch Sensor Cable for CU-4 and IoT ReadyTM drivers R CBL-5E-CU4-7F 7 foot Sensor Cable for CU-4 and IoT ReadyTM drivers N/A N/A N/A N/A NOTES N/A 4- Luminaire will be compatible with Lutron LRF2-OCR2B-P-WH Ceiling mount360° occupancy/va- cancy sensor & LRF2-DCRB- WH Ceiling-mount daylight sensor. Sensors must be ordered through Lutron. 5- Luminaire will be compatible with ENLIGHTED SU-5E-IoT, SU-5E-CL, SU-5E-IL, SU- 5S-H, Sensors. 6-Luminaire will be compatible with Leviton Intellect App & Keypad Room Controller 7-Luminaire will be compatible with EN-SCPPH-1500-ZB Wireless Passive Infrared Occupancy and Photo Sensors 8-Luminaire will be compatible with Philips ͤHOGDQG wireless switch. 9-Luminaire will be compatiable with DLM Room control system LMPB-100. DLM control system must be orderd through Legrand. EasySense By Elite Lighting 4” Architectural High Lumen LED Downlight HH4-LED 4” R LMF4- *OUFHSBUFE'JYUVSF 4FOTPS$POUSPMMFS Project Name: FORM AND FUNCTION •6OHHNORZSURêOHKRXVLQJ •6SHFJUDGHSHUIRUPDQFH •(QJLQHHUHGIRURSWLPXPWKHUPDOPDQDJHPHQW •/RZGHSUHFLDWLRQUDWH •5HGXFHVHQHUJ\FRQVXPSWLRQDQGFRVWVXSWR •([FHHGV,(6IRRWFDQGOHOHYHOVXWLOL]LQJWKHOHDVWQXPEHURI SROHVDQGê[WXUHVSHUSURMHFW •2SWLFDOV\VWHPGHVLJQHGIRU 3DUNLQJ/RWV $XWR'HDOHUVKLSV *HQHUDO$UHD/LJKWLQJ Type: AREA LIGHTING NV-1-ASA CONSTRUCTION •'LH&DVW$OXPLQXP •([WHUQDOFRROLQJêQV •&RUURVLRQUHVLVWDQWH[WHUQDOKDUGZDUH •2QHSLHFHVLOLFRQHJDVNHWHQVXUHV,3VHDOIRUHOHFWURQLFV FRPSDUWPHQW •2QHSLHFH2SWLFV3ODWH™PRXQWLQJVLOLFRQH0LFUR2SWLFV •7ZRSLHFHVLOLFRQH0LFUR2SWLFV\VWHPHQVXUHV,3OHYHOVHDO DURXQGHDFK3&% •*UDGH&OHDU$QRGL]HG2SWLFV3ODWH™VWDQGDUG WARRANTY )LYH\HDUOLPLWHGZDUUDQW\IRUGULYHUVDQG/('V LISTINGS •&HUWLêHGWR8/ •8/ •&6$&1R •'HVLJQ/LJKWV&RQVRUWLXP® '/& •'HVLJQ/LJKWV&RQVRUWLXP3UHPLXP® '/&3 •,3,35DWHG •*9LEUDWLRQ5DWHGSHU$16,& FINISH •PLOVHOHFWURVWDWLFSRZGHUFRDW •1/6ÚVWDQGDUGKLJKTXDOLW\êQLVKHVSUHYHQWFRUURVLRQSURWHFWV DJDLQVWDQGH[WUHPHHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQGLWLRQV Cat# Light Dist. # of LEDs Milliamps Kelvin Volts Mounting Color Options 120-277 (UNV) 347-480 (HV) Bronze Textured (BRZ) White Textured (WHT) Smooth White Gloss (SWT) Silver (SVR) Black Textured (BLK) Smooth Black Gloss (SBK) Graphite Textured (GPH) Grey Textured (GRY) Custom (CS) Notes: 1 2 3 Consult Factory for Lead Time. Consult Factory for 90 CRI Requests. Universal Voltage 120-277 HSS not applicable with Nema 2 and Nema 3 Optics 16 (16L) 32 (32L) 48 (48L) 64 (64L) Type 2 (T2) Type 3 (T3) Type 4 (T4) Type 5 (T5) Nema 224° Narrow Beam (N2) Nema 330° Narrow Beam (N3) NV-1 (NV-1) 350 (35) 530 (53) 700 (7) 1050 (1) ArchitecturalSweep Arm(ASA) 3 Bird Spikes (BS) Marine Grade Finish (MGF) Optic Plate Painted to Match Fixture (OPP) Nema 7-Pin Receptacle (PE7) Photocell + Receptacle (PCR) Receptacle + Shorting Cap (PER) FSP-211 with Motion Sensor (FSP-20) 9'-20'' Heights (FSP-40) 21'-40' Heights Quick Mount Bracket (QMB) RetroêWMount Bracket (RQMB) Round Pole Adaptor 3"- 4" Pole (RPA4) Round Pole Adaptor 5"- 6" Pole (RPA5) Rotated Optic Left (ROL) Rotated Optic Right (ROR) Automotive House Side Shield (AHS) House Side Shield (HSS) 2 2 2700K, 80 CRI (27K8) 3000K, 70 CRI (30K7) 3000K, 80 CRI (30K8) 3500K, 80 CRI (35K8) 4000K, 70 CRI (40K7) 4000K, 80 CRI (40K8) 5000K, 70 CRI (50K7) 5000K, 80 CRI (50K8) 1 1 1 1 LED WATTAGE CHART 16L 32L 48L 64L 350 milliamps 18w - - - 530 milliamps 28w - - - 700 milliamps 36w 71w 104w 136w 1050 milliamps 56w 106w 156w 205w 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com FSP-211 RPA4 / RPA5 Weight: 24 lbs 3.375" 14.75" 16.5" HOUSE SIDE SHIELD TOP VIEW AUTOMOTIVE HOUSE SIDE SHIELD TYPE II (T2) TYPE III (T3) TYPE IV (T4) TYPE V (T5) NEMA 3 (N3) ELECTRICAL •9ROWV 819 RU9ROWV +9 •9GLPPLQJGULYHUE\3KLOLSV$GYDQFH •'ULYHUSRZHUIDFWRUDWPD[LPXPORDGLV* 7+'PD[LPXPORDGLV •$OOLQWHUQDOZLULQJ8/FHUWLêHGIRU9$&DQGr& •$OOGULYHUVFRQWUROVDQGVHQVRUVKRXVHGLQHQFORVHG,3FRPSDUWPHQW •/XPLOHGV/X[HRQ0;/(' V •&5,RU •&RORUWHPSHUDWXUHV ..... •6XUJH3URWHFWLRQ .9$VXSSOLHVDVVWDQGDUG OPTIONS • BIRD SPIKES (BS)Ø2IIHUVHIIHFWLYHDQGKXPDQHGHWHUUHQWIRUODUJHUELUG VSHFLHVDQGSURYLGHVFRVWHIIHFWLYHORQJWHUPVROXWLRQWRQXLVDQFHELUG LQIHVWDWLRQVDQGSURWHFW\RXUSURSHUW\ • MARINE GRADE FINISH (MGF)Ø$PXOWLVWHSSURFHVVFUHDWLQJSURWHFWLYH êQLVKLQJFRDWDJDLQVWKDUVKHQYLURQPHQWV ß&KHPLFDOO\ZDVKHGLQDVWDJHFOHDQLQJV\VWHP ß3UHEDNHG ß3RZGHUFRDWHGPLOVRI=LQF5LFK6XSHU'XUDEOH3RO\HVWHU3ULPHU ßIHHWLQVLGHSROHFRYHUDJHWRSDQGERWWRP ß2YHQ%DNHG ß)LQLVKHG3RZGHU&RDWLQJRI6XSHU'XUDEOH3RO\HVWHU3RZGHU&RDW PLOWKLFNQHVV • SHIELDS (HSS, AHS)Ø+RXVH6LGH6KLHOG +66 LVGHVLJQHGIRUIXOO SURSHUW\OLQHFXWRII$XWRPRWLYH+RXVH6LGH6KLHOG $+6 LVDVLQJOHVLGHG VKLHOGDOORZLQJSDUWLDOFXWRIIRQHLWKHUVLGHRUIURQWRIOXPLQDLUH • ROUND POLE ADAPTER (RPA)– :KHQXVLQJURXQGSROHVVSHFLI\5RXQG 3ROH$GDSWHU 53$ 6SHFLI\53$ZKHQLQVWDOOLQJRQURXQGSROHVDQG 53$ZKHQLQVWDOOLQJRQURXQGSROHV CONTROLS • FSP-211 (FSP-X)Ø3DVVLYHLQIUDUHG 3,5 VHQVRUSURYLGLQJPXOWLOHYHO FRQWUROEDVHGRQPRWLRQGD\OLJKWFRQWULEXWLRQ •$OOFRQWUROSDUDPHWHUVDGMXVWDEOHYLDZLUHOHVVFRQêJXUDWLRQUHPRWH VWRULQJDQGWUDQVPLWWLQJVHQVRUSURêOHV •)63PRXQWLQJKHLJKWV IHHW •)63PRXQWLQJKHLJKWVIHHW •,QFOXGHVGLPPLQJHYHQWF\FOHV9GLPPLQJZLWKPRWLRQ VHQVLQJUHSURJUDPPDEOHLQWKHêHOG • NEMA 7-PIN RECEPTACLE (PE7)Ø$Q$16,&UHFHSWDFOH SURYLGHVHOHFWULFDODQGPHFKDQLFDOLQWHUFRQQHFWLRQEHWZHHQSKRWRFRQWURO FHOODQGOXPLQDLUH'LPPLQJUHFHSWDFOHDYDLODEOHWZRRUIRXUGLPPLQJ FRQWDFWVVXSSRUWV9'&GLPPLQJPHWKRGVRU'LJLWDO$GGUHVVDEOH /LJKWLQJ,QWHUIDFH '$/, SURYLGLQJUHOLDEOHSRZHULQWHUFRQQHFW OPTICS 6LOLFRQHRSWLFVKLJKSKRWRWKHUPDOVWDELOLW\DQGOLJKWRXWSXWSURYLGHVKLJKHU SRZHUHG/('VZLWKPLQLPL]HGOXPHQGHSUHFLDWLRQ/('OLIH89DQGWKHUPDO VWDELOLW\ZLWKVFUDWFKUHVLVWDQFHLQFUHDVHVH[WHULRUDSSOLFDWLRQGXUDELOLW\ •,(67\SHV 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com *DLC S= Standard P= Premium PART NUMBER N3 LM/W T2 LM/W DLC T3 LM/W DLC T3 HSS LM/W T4 LM/W DLC T4 AHS LM/W T4 HSS LM/W T5 LM/W DLC W NV-1-16L-35-30K 2016 112 2106 117 P 2106 117 P 1134 63 2187 116 P 1296 72 1116 62 2231 118 P 18 NV-1-16L-35-40K 2088 116 2268 126 P 2286 127 P 1206 67 2250 125 P 1368 76 1188 66 2304 128 P 18 NV-1-16L-35-50K 2160 120 2376 132 P 2394 133 P 1278 71 2358 131 P 1440 80 1260 70 2412 134 P 18 NV-1-16L-53-30K 3136 112 3192 114 P 3220 115 P 1764 63 3119 113 P 2016 72 1736 62 3248 116 P 28 NV-1-16L-53-40K 3248 116 3472 124 P 3472 124 P 1876 67 3444 123 P 2128 76 1848 66 3500 125 P 28 NV-1-16L-53-50K 3360 120 3612 129 P 3640 130 P 1988 71 3584 128 P 2240 80 1960 70 3668 131 P 28 NV-1-16L-7-30K 4032 112 3960 110 P 3960 110 P 2268 63 3973 109 P 2592 72 2232 62 3996 111 P 36 NV-1-16L-7-40K 4176 116 4428 123 P 4284 119 P 2412 67 4212 117 P 2736 76 2376 66 4320 120 P 36 NV-1-16L-7-50K 4320 120 4644 129 P 4500 125 P 2556 71 4428 123 P 2880 80 2520 70 4500 125 P 36 NV-1-16L-1-30K 6272 112 6160 110 S 6384 114 P 3528 63 6232 112 P 4032 72 3472 62 6440 115 P 56 NV-1-16L-1-40K 6496 116 6832 122 P 6888 123 P 3752 67 6776 121 P 4256 76 3696 66 6944 124 P 56 NV-1-16L-1-50K 6720 120 7168 128 P 7224 129 P 3976 71 7112 127 P 4480 80 3920 70 7280 130 P 56 NV-1-32L-7-30K 7952 112 7810 110 S 7810 110 S 4473 63 7739 109 S 5112 72 4402 62 7881 111 S 71 NV-1-32L-7-40K 8236 116 9017 127 P 8449 119 P 4757 67 8307 117 P 5396 76 4686 66 8520 120 P 71 NV-1-32L-7-50K 8520 120 9159 129 P 8875 125 P 5041 71 8733 123 P 5680 80 4970 70 8946 126 P 71 NV-1-32L-1-30K 11872 112 11660 110 S 12084 114 S 6678 63 11820 112 S 7632 72 6572 62 12190 115 S 106 NV-1-32L-1-40K 12296 116 12932 122 P 13038 123 P 7102 67 12826 121 P 8056 76 6996 66 13144 124 P 106 NV-1-32L-1-50K 12720 120 13568 128 P 13674 129 P 7526 71 13462 127 P 8480 80 7420 70 13780 130 P 106 NV-1-48L-7-30K 11648 112 11440 110 S 11440 110 S 6552 63 11336 109 S 7488 72 6448 62 11544 111 S 104 NV-1-48L-7-40K 12064 116 13208 127 P 12376 119 P 6968 67 12168 117 P 7904 76 6864 66 12480 120 P 104 NV-1-48L-7-50K 12480 120 13520 130 P 13000 125 P 7384 71 12792 123 P 8320 80 7280 70 13104 126 P 104 NV-1-48L-1-30K 17472 112 17160 110 S 17784 114 S 9828 63 17472 112 S 11232 72 9672 62 17940 115 S 156 NV-1-48L-1-40K 18096 116 19032 122 P 19188 123 P 10452 67 18876 121 P 11856 76 10296 66 19344 124 P 156 NV-1-48L-1-50K 18720 120 19968 128 P 20124 129 P 11076 71 19812 127 P 12480 80 10920 70 20280 130 P 156 NV-1-64L-7-30K 15232 112 14960 110 S 14960 110 S 8568 63 14824 109 S 9792 72 8432 62 15096 111 S 136 NV-1-64L-7-40K 15776 116 17272 127 P 16184 119 P 9112 67 15912 117 P 10336 76 8976 66 16320 120 P 136 NV-1-64L-7-50K 16320 120 17680 130 P 17000 125 P 9656 71 16728 123 P 10880 80 9520 70 17136 126 P 136 NV-1-64L-1-30K 22960 112 22550 110 S 23370 114 S 12915 63 22960 112 S 14760 72 12710 62 23575 115 S 205 NV-1-64L-1-40K 23780 116 25010 122 P 25215 123 P 13735 67 24805 121 P 15580 76 13530 66 25420 124 P 205 NV-1-64L-1-50K 24600 120 26240 128 P 26445 129 P 14555 71 26035 127 P 16400 80 14350 70 26650 130 P 205 LUMENS PART NUMBER T2 T3 T3 HSS T4 T4 HSS T5 NV-1-16L-35-30K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B2-U0-G0 NV-1-16L-35-40K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B2-U0-G0 NV-1-16L-35-50K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G0 B2-U0-G2 NV-1-16L-53-30K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-53-40K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-53-50K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-7-30K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-7-40K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-7-50K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-1-30K B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G1 NV-1-16L-1-40K B1-U0-G1 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G2 NV-1-16L-1-50K B1-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-7-30K B1-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B3-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-7-40K B1-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G1 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-7-50K B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-1-30K B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-1-40K B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-32L-1-50K B2-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-48L-7-30K B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-48L-7-40K B2-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-48L-7-50K B2-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B0-U0-G2 B2-U0-G2 B0-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-48L-1-30K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-48L-1-40K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B5-U0-G3 NV-1-48L-1-50K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B5-U0-G3 NV-1-64L-7-30K B2-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-64L-7-40K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B0-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-64L-7-50K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B4-U0-G2 NV-1-64L-1-30K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G2 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G3 B5-U0-G3 NV-1-64L-1-40K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G3 B3-U0-G4 B1-U0-G3 B5-U0-G3 NV-1-64L-1-50K B3-U0-G3 B3-U0-G3 B1-U0-G3 B3-U0-G4 B1-U0-G3 B5-U0-G3 BUG RATINGS 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com 8.45" OPTICAL CONFIGURATIONS MOUNTING OPTIONS NV-1 / 32L 233 NV-1 / 48L NV-1 / 64L 5RWDWDEOH2SWLFV 525 5RWDWHG5LJKW 52/ 5RWDWHG/HIWRSWLRQVDYDLODEOH2SWLFVêHOGDQGIDFWRU\URWDWDEOH * OPTIC PLATE PAINTED TO MATCH FIXTURE FINISH (OPP)×2SWLF3ODWHVWDQGDUGFOHDUDQRGL]HG*UDGH:KHQ 233 VSHFLêHG2SWLF3ODWHêQLVKZLOOPDWFKê[WXUHêQLVK EPA EPA SGL D90 D180 T90 T120 QD NV-1-ASA 0.75 1.29 1.50 1.99 2.05 1.99 NV-1 / 16L ARCHITECTURAL SWEEP ARM (ASA) &DVW6ZHHS$UPLQFOXGHV DVVWDQGDUG ,QWHUQDO4XLFN0RXQW%UDFNHW Lumen Maintenance Data Ambient Temperature Drive Current L90 Hours* L70 Hours** 30,000 Hours* 50,000 Hours* 60,00 Hours* 100,000 Hours** 25°C Up to 700mA 58,000 173,000 95.7% 91.6% 89.6% 82.1% 1050mA 48,000 143,000 94.3% 89.5% 87.2% 78.5% *Reported extrapolations per IESNA TM-21 **Projected extrapolations per IESNA TM-21 Project Name: FORM AND FUNCTION •6OHHNORZSURêOHKRXVLQJ •6SHFJUDGHSHUIRUPDQFH •(QJLQHHUHGIRURSWLPXPWKHUPDOPDQDJHPHQW •5HGXFHVHQHUJ\FRQVXPSWLRQDQGFRVWVXSWR Type: HIGH PERFORMANCE FULL CUT OFF WALL PACK NV-W CONSTRUCTION •'LH&DVW$OXPLQXP •,QWHUQDOFRROLQJêQV •&RUURVLRQUHVLVWDQWH[WHUQDOKDUGZDUH •2QHSLHFHVLOLFRQHJDVNHWHQVXUHV,3VHDOIRUHOHFWURQLFVFRPSDUWPHQW •7ZRSLHFHVLOLFRQH0LFUR2SWLFV\VWHPHQVXUHV,3OHYHOVHDODURXQG HDFK3&% •6LOLFRQH0LFUR2SWLFV 5HFHVVHGIXOOFXWRIIDQGQRQ\HOORZLQJ •'DUN6N\&RPSOLDQW WARRANTY )LYH\HDUVWDQGDUGZDUUDQW\ LISTINGS •&HUWLêHGWR8/ •8/ •&6$&1R •'HVLJQ/LJKWV&RQVRUWLXP® '/& •'HVLJQ/LJKWV&RQVRUWLXP3UHPLXP® '/&3 •,3,35DWHG •,.&RPSOLDQW FINISH •PLOVHOHFWURVWDWLFSRZGHUFRDW •1/6ÚVWDQGDUGKLJKTXDOLW\êQLVKHVSUHYHQWFRUURVLRQSURWHFWVDJDLQVW DQGH[WUHPHHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQGLWLRQV Cat# Light Dist. # of LEDs Milliamps Kelvin Volts Mounting Color Options Options 120-277 (UNV) 347-480 (HV) Bronze Textured (BRZ) White Textured (WHT) Smooth White Gloss (SWT) Silver (SVR) Black Textured (BLK) Smooth Black Gloss (SBK) Graphite Textured (GPH) Grey Textured (GRY) Custom (CS) Notes: 1 2 3 2 4 3 4 5 6 6 7 7 Consult Factory for Lead Time. Consult Factory for 90 CRI Requests. To match EM Extension Box Requires Deep Back Box Universal Voltage 120-277 All Emergency Battery Options Certified CA Title 20 (1A) 32L only (1) 16L only Wall Mount(WM) 16 (16L) 32 (32L) Type 2 (T2) Type 3 (T3) Type 4 (T4) NV-W (NV-W) 350 (35) 530 (53) 700 (7) 1000 (1A) 1050 (1) Marine Grade Finish (MGF) Vanity Plate 16" SQ (VP16) Housing Extension (HE) Surge Protector (20KA) FSP-211 with Motion Sensor (FSP-8) *8' Heights and below (FSP-20) *9'-20'' Heights Nema 7-Pin Receptacle (PE7) Button Photo Cell (PC) Emergency Battery 4w 516-564 Lumens (EM4) Emergency Battery 8w 1032-1128 Lumens (EM8) Emergency Battery 18w 2064-2256 Lumens (EM16) Emergency Cold Pk Battery 14w 1806-1974 Lumens (EMCP) 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 2700K, 80 CRI (27K8) 3000K, 70 CRI (30K7) 3000K, 80 CRI (30K8) 3500K, 80 CRI (35K8) 4000K, 70 CRI (40K7) 4000K, 80 CRI (40K8) 5000K, 70 CRI (50K7) 5000K, 80 CRI (50K8) 1 1 1 1 LED WATTAGE CHART 16L 32L 350 milliamps 19w - 530 milliamps 29w - 700 milliamps 37w 71w 1000 milliamps - 100w 1050 milliamps 56w 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com TYPE II (T2) TYPE III (T3) TYPE IV (T4) 12" 7239,(:%277209,(: 9.08" 5.57"3.92" EMERGENCY BATTERY AND 7-PIN EXTENSION BOX DIMENSIONS VANITY PLATE (VP) 4" 7239,(: 11" 7239,(: * 3 Conduit access points on either side or center back. MOUNTING HOLE *3 Conduit access points on either side or center back 6" Ø.600 3.25" 2.4" 6.00 3.00 4X .281 1.00 5.00 16.00 16" 3"5"6" Ø 1" 4X Ø .281 Weight: 9.1 lbs Weight: 13.3 lbs ELECTRICAL •9ROWV 819 RU9ROWV +9 •9GLPPLQJGULYHUE\3KLOLSV$GYDQFH •'ULYHUSRZHUIDFWRUDWPD[LPXPORDGLVt 7+'PD[LPXPORDGLV •$OOLQWHUQDOZLULQJ8/FHUWLêHGIRU9$&DQGr& •$OOGULYHUVFRQWUROVDQGVHQVRUVKRXVHGLQHQFORVHG,3FRPSDUWPHQW •/XPLOHGV/X[HRQ0;/(' V •&5,RU •&RORUWHPSHUDWXUHV ..... •6XUJH3URWHFWLRQ .$LVDYDLODEOHDVDQRSWLRQ OPTIONS • MARINE GRADE FINISH (MGF)Ø$PXOWLVWHSSURFHVVFUHDWLQJSURWHFWLYH êQLVKLQJFRDWDJDLQVWKDUVKHQYLURQPHQWV ß&KHPLFDOO\ZDVKHGLQDVWDJHFOHDQLQJV\VWHP ß3UHEDNHG ß3RZGHUFRDWHGPLOVRI=LQF5LFK6XSHU'XUDEOH3RO\HVWHU3ULPHU ßIHHWLQVLGHSROHFRYHUDJHWRSDQGERWWRP ß2YHQ%DNHG ß)LQLVKHG3RZGHU&RDWLQJRI6XSHU'XUDEOH3RO\HVWHU3RZGHU&RDWPLO WKLFNQHVV • VANITY PLATE (VP)Ø7KH9DQLW\3ODWHZDVGHVLJQHGWRFRYHUWKHXQVLJKWO\ UHPDLQVRQDZDOOZKHUHDODUJHU+,'ZDOOSDFNZDVUHPRYHG7KH9DQLW\ 3ODWHZLOOEHSDLQWHGWRPDWFKWKHêQLVKRIWKH19:FXVWRPêQLVKHVDUH DYDLODEOHSOHDVHFRQVXOWIDFWRU\7KHVWDQGDUG9DQLW\3ODWHLVÝ[Ý • NEMA 7-PIN RECEPTACLE (PE7)Ø$Q$16,&UHFHSWDFOH SURYLGHVHOHFWULFDODQGPHFKDQLFDOLQWHUFRQQHFWLRQEHWZHHQSKRWRFRQWURO FHOODQGOXPLQDLUH'LPPLQJUHFHSWDFOHDYDLODEOHWZRRUIRXUGLPPLQJ FRQWDFWVVXSSRUWV9'&GLPPLQJPHWKRGVRU'LJLWDO$GGUHVVDEOH /LJKWLQJ,QWHUIDFH '$/, SURYLGLQJUHOLDEOHSRZHULQWHUFRQQHFW • EMERGENCY BATTERY OPERATIONØ7KHHPHUJHQF\EDWWHU\EDFNXS LVLQWHJUDOWRWKH19:$OOHPHUJHQF\EDFNXSFRQêJXUDWLRQVLQFOXGHD VWDQGDORQHVHFRQGDU\GULYHUZLWKLQWHJUDOUHOD\WRGHWHFWSRZHUORVV7KLV PHHWV1)3$1(&7KHHPHUJHQF\EDWWHU\ZLOOSRZHUWKH19: IRU PLQXWHVRQFHSRZHULVORVW(PHUJHQF\EDWWHU\SDFNDUHRI/L)H3 EDWWHULHV (0&3 (PHUJHQF\&ROG3DFN%DWWHULHVDUHUDWHGIRUr&WRr& OPTICS 6LOLFRQHRSWLFVKLJKSKRWRWKHUPDOVWDELOLW\DQGOLJKWRXWSXWSURYLGHVKLJKHU SRZHUHG/('VZLWKPLQLPL]HGOXPHQGHSUHFLDWLRQ/('OLIH89DQGWKHUPDO VWDELOLW\ZLWKVFUDWFKUHVLVWDQFHLQFUHDVHVH[WHULRUDSSOLFDWLRQGXUDELOLW\ •,(67\SHV 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com MOTION SENSOR PLACEMENT CONTROLS • DIMMING CONTROL (FSP)Ø3DVVLYHLQIUDUHG 3,5 VHQVRUSURYLGLQJPXOWLOHYHOFRQWURO EDVHGRQPRWLRQGD\OLJKWFRQWULEXWLRQ •$OOFRQWUROSDUDPHWHUVDGMXVWDEOHYLDZLUHOHVVFRQêJXUDWLRQUHPRWHVWRULQJDQG WUDQVPLWWLQJVHQVRUSURêOHV •)63PRXQWLQJKHLJKWVIHHWDQGEHORZ •)63PRXQWLQJKHLJKWV IHHW •,QFOXGHVGLPPLQJHYHQWF\FOHV9GLPPLQJZLWKPRWLRQVHQVLQJ UHSURJUDPPDEOHLQWKHêHOG FSP-8 FSP-20 701 Kingshill Place, Carson, CA 90746 Call Us Today (310) 341-2037 nlslighting.com PART NUMBER T2 LM/W T3 LM/W T4 LM/W WATTS (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0&3. (0&3. (0&3. EMERGENCY BATTERY BACK-UP LUMENS PART NUMBER T2 LM/W T3 LM/W T4 LM/W WATTS 19:/.2470 130 2499 132 2470 130 19 19:/.2618 138 2648 139 2618 138 19 19:/.2618 138 2648 139 2618 138 19 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/. 19:/$. 19:/$. 19:/$. LUMENS PART NUMBER T2 T3 T4 WATTS 19:/.B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 19 19:/.B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 19 19:/.B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 B1-U0-G1 19 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/. %8* %8* %8* 19:/$. %8* %8* %8* 19:/$. %8* %8* %8* 19:/$. %8* %8* %8* BUG RATINGS Lumen Maintenance Data Ambient Temperature Drive Current L90 Hours* L70 Hours** 30,000 Hours* 50,000 Hours* 60,00 Hours* 100,000 Hours** 25°C Up to 700mA 58,000 173,000 95.7% 91.6% 89.6% 82.1% 1050mA 48,000 143,000 94.3% 89.5% 87.2% 78.5% *Reported extrapolations per IESNA TM-21 **Projected extrapolations per IESNA TM-21 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Launch Properties 800 Lasalle Avenue, Suite 1610 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 JUNE 2022 Attachment I Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GREY FOX ROAD REDEVELOPMENT ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ June 1, 2022 Jacob Rojer, P.E. Date License No. 56767 3 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Roadways ................................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 4 Background Growth and Committed Traffic........................................................................................... 5 Pedestrians And Bicycles ...................................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Site Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................... 6 Site Accesses and Assignment ............................................................................................................. 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 7 Opening Year (2023) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................ 8 Opening Year (2023) Build Conditions .................................................................................................. 8 Design Year (2040) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................... 9 Design Year (2040) Build Conditions ................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 4 INTRODUCTION Launch Properties is proposing a 3,070-square foot medical-dental office building, a one tunnel car wash, a 2,210-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,510-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The existing site is an approximately 56,000-square foot, industrial use building. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed project location. All exhibits are included in Appendix A. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed development is located on the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The following existing intersections will be included in the traffic capacity analysis: x Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road x Grey Fox Road and Site Access 1 The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1. EXISTING ROADWAYS Access to the development will be on Grey Fox Road. The following provides a detailed description of the surrounding roadways. Lexington Avenue (CSAH 51) is currently a north-south five-lane undivided County State Aid Highway (CSAH) with two lanes in each direction and a two way left turn lane, however in spring of 2022 construction is planned to convert the roadway to a four-lane divided roadway. These geometric changes will be incorporated into the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) models. The MnDOT Functional Classification System Map classifies Lexington Avenue as a Minor Arterial Roadway. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports an annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 21,300 vehicles per day (vpd) in 2019 on Lexington Avenue. The posted speed limit on Lexington Avenue is 40 miles per hour (mph). Grey Fox Road is a two-lane east-west roadway with one lane in each direction. Grey Fox Road is classified as a Local Road according to the MnDOT Functional Classification System Map. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the AADT on Grey Fox Road as 3,450 vpd in 2017. The current posted speed limit on Grey Fox Road is 30 mph. Exhibit 2 provides the future intersection geometry and intersection control for the study intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze the traffic operations at the study intersection, weekday peak period turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, June 17, 2021. Exhibit 3 provides a summary of the weekday AM and PM peak hour turning traffic volumes. The turning movement count data is provided in Appendix B. The network AM peak hour was determined to be 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM and the network PM peak hour was determined to be 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM. The 2021 turning movement counts were compared to historic AADT on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road and 2018 turning movement counts in the area to determine if there are still variations in traffic 5 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 volumes due to COVID-19. Overall, the 2021 turning movement counts were greater than historic AADT and the peak hour volumes were similar to the 2018 turning movement counts so an adjustment factor was not applied to the turning movement counts. BACKGROUND GROWTH AND COMMITTED TRAFFIC Historical AADT data provided by MnDOT’s Interactive Traffic Mapping Application and the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study conducted by SRF in February 2021 were reviewed to develop a background growth rate to forecast peak hour volumes at the study intersections for Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040). Based on historic growth rates and prior traffic study, a 0.5% annual growth rate was applied to the Existing (2021) traffic volumes to develop the Opening Year (2023) and Design Year (2040) turning movement volumes. In addition to background growth, the trips generated by the Phase 3 of the Lexington Station Development were added to study intersections, these trips were assigned as documented in the Lexington Station Phase 3 Traffic Study for all analysis scenarios. With the reconstruction of Lexington Avenue, the access approximately 500 feet south of the Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road, that serves Cub Foods and the strip mall to the south will be converted to a ¾ access. This would result in the eastbound left turning traffic destined to the north at the access to reroute to the Grey Fox Road & Lexington Avenue signal. The redistributed exiting volumes were taken from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) Traffic Study completed in April 2019 by Alliant Engineering; these redistributed trips were included at the study area intersections for all analysis scenarios. Exhibit 4 shows the Opening Year No-Build (2023) turning movement volumes and Exhibit 5 shows the Horizon Year No-Build (2040) turning movement volumes. PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES There is an existing trail on the east side of Lexington Avenue, on the west side of Lexington Avenue there is a sidewalk south of Grey Fox Road. There are marked crosswalks and pedestrian push-buttons on all approaches of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road. There are no sidewalks adjacent to the site on Grey Fox Road. With the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction Project that is scheduled to be constructed in 2022, pedestrian facilities will be improved. Additionally, the sidewalk west of Lexington Avenue will be extended to the north to Red Fox Road, providing pedestrian facilities on both sides of Lexington Avenue. An east-west sidewalk is proposed running east-west along the southern boundary of the proposed site (i.e. on the north side of Grey Fox Road) that would provide a pedestrian facility along Grey Fox Road. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIP GENERATION The trip-generating potential of the proposed development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Generally, standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the anticipated total trips generated by the site. However, due to the lack of trip generation data during the AM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic for the Walk-in bank, trip generation data for the bank is from the peak hour of the generator. Additionally, due to a lack of AM peak hour data Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 6 for the Automated Car Wash land use, the PM peak hour data was used for the AM peak hour. Both trip generation approximations are anticipated to be conservative assumptions. Trip generation data was based on ITE Land Use Code (LUC 720) (Medical-Dental Office Building), ITE (LUC 911) (Walk-in Bank), and ITE (LUC 934) (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through), and ITE (LUC 948) (Automated car Wash) were used to calculate the trip generation potential of the site. Table 1 provides a summary of the number of trips anticipated to be generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. As shown, the site is anticipated to generate 295 new trips during the AM peak hour (153 entering, 142 exiting) and 264 new trips during the PM peak hour (132 entering, 132 exiting). Table 1 – Site Trip Generation For this analysis, it was assumed that all site trips will be vehicle trips. To be conservative, it was assumed that all site trips would be new trips and no mode split reductions for trips via transit, bike or walking were used. SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION The site trips were distributed to the adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following global trip distribution was assumed for the development: x 50% to/from the north on Lexington Avenue x 40% to/from the south on Lexington Avenue x 10% to/from the west on Grey Fox Road The trip distribution for the site-generated traffic is shown in Exhibit 6. SITE ACCESSES AND ASSIGNMENT The site will include two (2) accesses. Access 1 will be located on the north side of Grey Fox Road, approximately 240 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 1 will be aligned with the existing grocery access to the south to minimize conflict areas. Access 2 will also be located on Grey Fox Road, approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lane and one ingress lane. Land Use Description Intensity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Medical-Dental Office Building (LUC 720) 3,070 S.F. 8 2 10 4 8 12 Walk-in Bank (LUC 911) 2,210 S.F. 26 24 50 29 29 58 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through (LUC 934) 3,510 S.F. 80 77 157 60 56 116 Automated Car Wash (LUC 948) 1 Car Wash Tunnel 39 39 78 39 39 78 Total Site Generated Trips 153 142 295 132 132 264 7 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 Additionally, all three of the existing accesses are proposed to be removed, including the access located approximately 60 feet west of Lexington Avenue. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix C. The site trips were assigned to the study intersections as shown in Exhibit 7. CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. Existing signal timings used in the analysis were provided by Ramsey County. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 2. The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is also shown in Table 2. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. Table 2 – Level of Service Information Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Description A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized) Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized) Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized) Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing were evaluated for each scenario. Due to the scheduled reconstruction of Lexington Avenue in 2022, the existing conditions were not analyzed. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows: x Opening Year (2023) No-Build x Opening Year (2023) Build x Design Year (2040) No-Build Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 8 x Design Year (2040) Build OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the opening year. The analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. The existing study intersections were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control. The intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road used the geometry and intersection control from the Lexington Avenue Reconstruction (I-694 to CR E) project. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 4. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 3. Table 3 – Opening Year (2023) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 41.6 D 33.2 C 6.4 A 6.3 A WB 42.0 D 38.6 D 6.6 A NB 6.0 A 3.3 A 0.8 A SB 5.8 A 3.1 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.9 A 0.7 A 0.1 A 6.3 A WB 1.0 A 0.5 A 0.5 A NB 4.3 A - - 2.9 A SB 5.5 A 6.3 A 2.8 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 38.2 D 26.6 C 8.9 A 10.6 B WB 35.4 D 35.0 C 7.5 A NB 13.3 B 8.4 A 1.5 A SB 14.0 B 6.9 A 1.3 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.1 A 1.4 A 0.1 A 6.8 A WB 1.3 A 0.5 A 0.4 A NB 5.7 A 5.6 A 5.6 A SB 2.3 A 6.8 A 3.3 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM peak hour and in the PM peak hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD CONDITIONS Opening Year (2023) Build conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of the site traffic to the study intersections. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site trips in Exhibit 7 to the Opening Year (2023) No-Build turning movement volumes in Exhibit 4. The Opening Year (2023) Build turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 8. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 4. 9 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 Table 4 – Opening Year (2023) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 37.8 D 25.6 C 6.5 A 9.2 A WB 38.3 D 31.0 C 5.5 A NB 10.1 B 5.0 A 1.2 A SB 7.1 A 6.3 A 1.6 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.4 A 0.3 A 0.0 A 5.7 A WB 2.2 A 1.2 A 0.6 A NB 4.6 A - - 3.6 A SB 5.7 A - - 4.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.4 A 0.4 A - - 2.8 A WB - - 0.3 A - - NB - - - - - - SB - - - - 2.8 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 33.5 C 27.6 C 9.4 A 13.7 B WB 31.2 C 62.1 E 8.1 A NB 16.2 B 11.3 B 1.9 A SB 15.5 B 12.6 B 2.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.5 A 1.3 A 0.1 A 9.9 A WB 2.2 A 1.1 A 0.6 A NB 8.9 A 9.5 A 7.5 A SB 9.9 A - - 5.7 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 2.1 A 0.5 A - - 2.6 A WB - - 0.5 A - - NB - - - - - - SB - - - - 2.6 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Opening Year (2023) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS A in the AM Peak Hour and LOS B or better in the PM Peak Hour. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better, except for the westbound through movement at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road in the PM peak hour, which operates at LOS E. The westbound through movement only has two vehicles in the PM peak hour and is therefore, not anticipated to have a significant impact on other turning movements. In the simulation, delay can fluctuate significantly based on when those two vehicles arrive within the signal timing due to the modeling nature of SimTraffic. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. The eastbound approach at Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road should be monitored, going forward. SimTraffic is reporting a 95th percentile queue of approximately 220 feet, which has the potential to impact operations at site access 1, however SimTraffic Shows minimal delay at the site access. DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the design year. The existing intersections were modeled with the existing geometry Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 10 and intersection control. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 5. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 5. Table 5 – Design Year (2040) No-Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 43.2 D 26.5 C 4.6 A 6.9 A WB 45.0 D 40.1 D 6.5 A NB 7.6 A 3.7 A 0.7 A SB 6.1 A 3.4 A 0.8 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 0.5 A 0.2 A 0.0 A 5.5 A WB 1.2 A 0.6 A 0.4 A NB 5.5 A - - 3.0 A SB 2.1 A 4.1 A 2.4 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 37.8 D 27.2 C 10.4 B 10.7 B WB 35.6 D 28.0 C 7.7 A NB 14.8 B 8.6 A 1.5 A SB 15.2 B 7.4 A 1.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.8 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 14.5 B WB 1.7 A 0.7 A 0.2 A NB 5.0 A 14.5 B 6.5 A SB - - 5.9 A 4.0 A For Side Street Stop intersections, the worst individual movement was reported for the overall intersection LOS Based on the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM & PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at a LOS D or better. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D. All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD CONDITIONS The Design Year (2040) Build traffic volumes were developed from the addition of the Design Year (2040) No-Build volumes in Exhibit 5 and the Site Trips in Exhibit 7. Exhibit 9 shows the Design Year (2040) Build turning movement volumes. The site accesses were modeled as side street stop control. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 6. 11 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 Table 6 – Design Year (2040) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 39.2 D 21.6 C 6.1 A 9.4 A WB 37.7 D 36.5 D 5.4 A NB 9.2 A 5.4 A 1.0 A SB 7.6 A 6.5 A 1.5 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 2.0 A 0.4 A 0.0 A 5.8 A WB 2.0 A 1.1 A 0.6 A NB 4.1 A - - 3.8 A SB 5.8 A - - 3.4 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 1.8 A 0.4 A - - 2.7 A WB - - 0.3 A - - NB - - - - - - SB - - - - 2.7 A PM Peak Hour Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road Signal EB 33.3 C 26.1 C 10.6 B 14.5 B WB 29.3 C 21.0 C 7.6 A NB 19.3 B 12.3 B 2.1 A SB 17.2 B 13.8 B 2.7 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 1 (East) Side Street Stop EB 1.4 A 2.2 A 0.3 A 13.8 B WB 2.2 A 1.2 A 0.7 A NB 7.2 A 8.4 A 11.7 B SB 13.8 B - - 7.7 A Grey Fox Road & Site Access 2 (West) Side Street Stop EB 3.0 A 0.7 A - - 3.0 A WB - - 0.5 A - - NB - - - - - - SB - - - - 2.5 A Based on the Design Year (2040) Build capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM and PM peak hours. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D . All 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bays. The eastbound approach at Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road should be monitored, going forward. SimTraffic is reporting a 95th percentile queue of approximately 225 feet, which has the potential to impact operations at site access 1, however SimTraffic Shows minimal delay at the access. Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Launch Properties is proposing a 3,070-square foot medical-dental office building, a one tunnel car wash, a 2,210-square foot walk-in bank, and a 3,510-square foot restaurant with a drive through on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road in Arden Hills, MN. The site is anticipated to generate 295 new trips during the AM peak hour (153 entering, 142 exiting) and 264 new trips during the PM peak hour (132 entering, 132 exiting). Site access is proposed to include two (2) full accesses, one of the proposed accesses will be located on Grey Fox Road 240 feet west of Lexington Avenue and access 2 will be located on Grey Fox Road approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue. A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year (2023) No-Build, Opening Year (2023) Build, Design Year (2040) No-Build, and Design Year (2040) Build. In all four scenarios, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better, except the westbound through movement at Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road which operates at LOS E in the Opening Year (2023) Build conditions. This movement has 2 vehicles in the PM peak and can fluctuate significantly depending on the SimTraffic random seeding. The eastbound approach as Lexington Avenue & Grey Fox Road should be monitored to determine the extent of the impacts of the queue on site access 1. All other 95th percentiles queues have adequate storage capacity. It is recommended to install side street stop control at the site access. No other geometric changes are recommended as a result of the development. APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Site Layout Exhibit D. SimTraffic Analysis Results 13 Grey Fox Road Redevelopment – Arden Hills Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2022 A. Exhibits NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 1PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREAARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationStudy IntersectionsProposed Site Driveways/Study Intersections NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 2FUTURE GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROLARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProject Site LocationStudy IntersectionsExisting Signal ControlExisting Stop Control NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 3EXISTING (2021) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 4OPENING YEAR (2023) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 5DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 6SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTIONARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationSite Traffic DistributionInbound Site TrafficOutbound Site Traffic NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 7PROJECT TRAFFICARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 8OPENING YEAR (2023) BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) NOT TO SCALE51COUNTYEXHIBIT 9DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD PEAK HOUR VOLUMESARDEN HILLS, MNLEGENDProposed Site LocationAM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) Sound Study Results Rocket Car Wash – Grimes, IA April 2022 IPDG No. 2022 9275 Page 1 of 4 Summary The proposed project consists of the construction of a Rocket Car Wash located at 200 NE Destination Drive in Grimes, Iowa. The City of Grimes requested a sound study be conducted to ensure noise levels do not significantly impact surrounding properties. IP Design Group conducted noise level measurements at an existing Rocket Car Wash in Elkhorn, NE on April 27, 2022. The results from these measurements are included in this report and will be used to estimate noise levels of the proposed car wash. Background Noise is often described as unwanted sound and sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that is detected by the human ear. Sound pressure level is measured in decibels (dB) which is the log squared ratio of the pressure disturbance to a reference disturbance multiplied by ten. Table 1 shows common noise levels associated with various sources. Table 1 – Typical Sound Levels Sound Pressure Level (dB) Common Indoor and Outdoor Noises 130 Threshold of pain 120 Near a jet aircraft at takeoff 110 Riveting machine 100 Construction Site 90 Boiler Room 80 Shouting at 3ft 70 Vacuum cleaner 60 Conversational speech at 3ft 50 Quiet urban area during daytime 40 Quiet urban area at night 30 Quiet suburban area at night 20 Quiet countryside 10 Human breathing 0 Threshold of audibility Attachment J Sound Study Results Rocket Car Wash – Grimes, IA April 2022 IPDG No. 2022 9275 Page 2 of 4 Measurement Procedure Sound level measurements were taken at 7 locations in and around the Rocket Car Wash, including directly next to the dryers, 50’ away and at three separate property line locations. See Figure 1 for measurement locations. Two measurements were taken at each location and then averaged. The city of Grimes indicated concern with the noise level of the dryers so measurements were taken while the dryers were in use. Photos of the dryers are shown in Figure 2 below. The dryers operate only when a vehicle is going through the car wash and the drying time is about 35 seconds. Ambient noise level measurements were also taken at two locations while the dryers were not in use. Figure 1 – Measurement Locations Sound Study Results Rocket Car Wash – Grimes, IA April 2022 IPDG No. 2022 9275 Page 3 of 4 Figure 2 – Car Wash Dryers Measurement Results Measurements were taken at 2:15pm on a Wednesday afternoon. The weather was cloudy with an air temperature of 78° and 14 MPH winds. A number of vehicles were observed going through the car wash at this time. The type of vehicle did not have any impact on level of sound or spectra of the sound coming from the dryers. Sound level measurement results are reported in Table 2 below. Table 3 shows ambient noise level measurements with dryers off versus sound level measurements with dryers on. Sound Study Results Rocket Car Wash – Grimes, IA April 2022 IPDG No. 2022 9275 Page 4 of 4 Table 2 – Sound Level Measurements Measurement Location LAeq (1) At dryers inside carwash 104 dBA (2) Near exit inside carwash (32’ from dryers) 102 dBA (3) Directly outside carwash (5’ from carwash exit) 94 dBA (4) 50’ from dryers outside carwash 90 dBA (5) At property line (48’ from carwash exit) 81 dBA (6) At property line (115’ from carwash exit) 73 dBA (7) At property line (77’ from carwash exit) 67 dBA Table 3 – Sound Level Measurements with Dryers Off vs Dryers On Measurement Location LAeq (Dryers Off) LAeq (Dryers On) (3) Directly outside carwash (5’ from carwash exit) 73 dBA 94 dBA (6) At property line (115’ from carwash exit) 68 dBA 73 dBA Conclusion Noise levels generated by an existing Rocket Car Wash were measured in order to estimate noise levels at a proposed location in Grimes, IA. Please reach out if you have any questions or concerns regarding the results in this report. JME Z 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N | St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 651.644.9446 ZHRGREEN.COM June 20, 2022 David Swearingen, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Preliminary Plan Review Comments for Launch Retail – Arden Hills Development Dear David, A preliminary engineering plan review is completed on the plan sheets and reports for the Launch Retail – Arden Hills submittal (plan set dated – June 01, 2022). The submittal did not contain stormwater system information or details, so the stormwater system will need additional information to be submitted for a more thorough review. In addition, the storm water report could not be reviewed against the storm system confirm capacities, elevations, details, etc. A summary of the preliminary review comments are as follows: General Plan Review Comments 1. Additional information on the proposed storm system needs to be submitted for further review. 2. Additional storm and utility details need to be submitted for further review. 3. The stormwater report indicates a geotechnical analysis will be conducted at a later date. It also identifies the site and most likely have a very slow infiltration rate and a high runoff potential. What is the time frame for the geotech report? C000 – COVER SHEET 4. Erosion Control sheets C200 and C201 are identified in the legend but were not included in the submittal set. 5. Sheet C301-Site Details Sheet was not included in the submittal set. C001 – GENERAL NOTES 6. Erosion control plans not submitted. Need to be submitted for further erosion control notes and plan review. 7. Underground storm water system manufacturer information not submitted. Needs to be submitted for further review. 8. Geotech report not submitted. Needs to be submitted for further review. 9. Change all “his” and similar pronouns to neutral (ie. their). Attachment K David Swearingen June 20, 2022 2 C100 – DEMO PLAN 10. Remove existing fence is located outside of property limits and parking easement limits. Obtain and provide written property owner authorization to work offsite. 11. Confirm removals have been coordinated with proposed Ramsey County Lexington Ave improvements. 12. Show hydrants and utility poles on removal sheets and notes to protect. 13. Add remove existing concrete note to eastern existing driveway. 14. Extend curb removal to the entire length of the driveway removal. 15. Add sawcut or remove to next joint note for curb removals. 16. Add sawcut note for asphalt removal for water connection. 17. Add removal note to western driveway removal area. 18. Add sawcut note to the end of the curb removal locations. Curb should be removed at a joint location. C200 and C201 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS – PHASE 1 and 2 19. Sheets missing C300 – SITE PLAN 20. 10’ parking setback line extends along north property line, but it scales at 15 ft. Confirm or correct. 21. Show traffic patterns north of proposed carwash. Is that two-way traffic? 22. Confirm apparent trash enclosure north of proposed car wash. If trash enclosure, provide truck access/turning movements to confirm they are adequate. 23. Identify the large “X” on the north end of the island between lots 1 and 2. 24. Need striping information/detail for island north of proposed retail building. 25. Dimension drive widths past island. 26. Show traffic patterns at NE corner of retail building. Is this for a drive thru? 27. Does proposed retail building have a trash enclosure? 28. Confirm sidewalk connection to Lexington matches Ramsey County proposed improvements. 29. Proposed retail building has ADA access ramps and landing in front of handicapped parking. How does landing area adequately transition to access the door to the middle retail building? 30. ADA access and pedestrian access shown from proposed retail building to parking median island. An accessible curb cut should be provided through the 3’ median. 31. Confirm the ADA landing in the center parking island is adequate. 32. Confirm standard duty asphalt is adequate cover for storm system. 33. Provide striping information and details for ADA and crosswalk striping areas. 34. Is striping needed at southern parking bump-out at car wash? Looks like striping is proposed. 35. Show traffic patterns to enter car wash. How/where do cars queue? 36. Curb section L ends at the throat of the western driveway. What is the curbing to the west, outside of the carwash area? Is a transition curb needed? 37. Provide information on what the proposed sidewalk on west end is tying into. 38. An existing utility pole is shown in the western sidewalk. Pole or sidewalk needs to be relocated. 39. 15-foot curb radii are proposed at driveways. Show truck turning movements to confirm adequate access into and out of the site with no conflicts 40. Is eastern driveway for two-way access? David Swearingen June 20, 2022 3 41. An existing utility pole conflict is shown with the proposed sidewalk at the eastern end of Grey Fox Road. Who is installing that sidewalk, Developer or County? Pole needs to be relocated. 42. Site Plan note 5 – Any structures within ROW no longer being used should not be abandoned. 43. Site Plan note 10 – provide referenced ARCH/MEP plans for lighting and site electrical review. 44. Site Plan note 12 – provide architectural plans for dumpster enclosure location and review. 45. Site Plan note 16 – ADA parking stalls are shown different sizes. Confirm requirements and provide details. C400 – GRADING PLAN 46. Only a Stormwater Management Area is noted on the plans. Need additional stormwater system information, details, structures, manufacturer information, etc. to be able to perform stormwater system review. 47. Confirm how car wash exit area will drain. Only a 0.10’ fall in about 90-feet. 48. Show flow lines in car wash driveway areas. 49. A fall od 0.02’ is shown along gutter line on curb to the west of car wash area. Add flow lines to confirm drainage. 50. Show elevations at entrance of car wash 51. Confirm what the PVC connection to car wash area is. Is it gutter, or car wash water? 52. Is car wash a self-contained unit, or how is wash area collected, treated and drained? 53. Car wash ADA parking area does not show an accessible ramp. 54. Low spot shown on western driveway at ADA ramp. No CB is shown. 55. Stormwater from driveway within property limits is draining off-site. 56. Storm system from OCS-1 is connecting to system in Lexington. Confirm this is consistent with Ramsey County plans and construction schedule or provide alternative stormwater system connection. 57. Is developer or Ramsey County constructing sidewalk and boulevard improvements along Lexington? Confirm plans are coordinated. 58. Provide pipe information for connection to proposed retail building. 59. General Grading Plan note 3 – only HDPE and PVC pipes are shown. 60. General Grading Plan note 18 – provide elevation. 61. General Grading Plan note 21 – Site has areas with less than minimum grades. 62. Stormwater Management Notes note 1 – Filtration basins are noted. Is filtration being provided? Need more information, details, calcs, etc. C401 – GRADING DETAILS 63. Only a typical section is provided for the PRINSCO HRDROSTOR HS180. Additional manufacturer and stormwater information, structure and pipe details need to be provided to complete the stormwater review. 64. Storm system appears to be a “bottomless” system. Additional manufacturer and geotechnical information and reports need to be provided to complete stormwater review. C500 – UTILITY PLAN 65. Where does water connect to carwash? David Swearingen June 20, 2022 4 66. A 10’ separation is required between water and sanitary. Only a 5’ separation is shown. Provide adequate separation. 67. Detail elevations for water connection in Grey Fox Rd. for possible conflicts. 68. No valves are shown in the water system. 69. Provide details on sanitary connection. 70. Utility Plan Notes note 18 – ARCH/MEP plans not provided for site lighting and electrical review. L100 – LANDSCAPE PLAN 71. Grey Fox Rd frontage has landscaping in driveway removal areas. Identify and subbase abatement/removals for those areas. 72. Sod areas (D) are also snow removal stockpile areas. Confirm sod is adequate or identify any specific sod requirements needed for this. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT 73. Not enough information provided for a thorough stormwater management plan report review. 74. Provide stormwater system information to review against report results. 75. Page 3 of 50, Section 2.0 states assumed soils are Group D. Group D soils have very slow infiltration rates and a high runoff potential. 76. A geotechnical analysis and report need to be provided to confirm site soils, drainage and filtration assumptions, parameters and design are adequate. NMC GREY FOX LEX LAUNCH PROPERTIES NARRATIVE 77. Page 12 of 13 - Show traffic patterns and directions on plans 78. Page 12 of 13 - Is a joint access easement needed for shared access? ALTA SURVEY 79. Existing asphalt shown outside the parking easement. PEDESTRIAN ROUTE EXHIBIT 80. No apparent adequate access for ADA parking stall for car wash 81. Where does pedestrian route go to from the center parking median island ADA ramp? 82. Provide ADA access through drive through median for pedestrian route access. SNOW STORAGE EXHIBIT 83. Snow storage is shown outside north property line. Is parking easement being utilized for snow storage? If so, does parking easement allow for snow storage? 84. Confirm manhole cap design load is adequate for anticipated vehicle use. TRAFFIC STUDY 85. Confirm ITE Trip Gen Land uses are adequate with limited AM Peak Hour data. 86. Are any additional ITE studies, local studies, etc. available to refer too? 87. Confirm 120-ft driveway separation is adequate for operations and access. 88. Provide vehicle turn analysis to confirm access in and around site. David Swearingen June 20, 2022 5 FINAL PLAT 89. Is existing parking easement remaining or being abandoned? 90. Is a joint access easement required for shared access between two separate lots? Thank you for the opportunity to perform the engineering review on the Grey Fox Rd Launch Properties development plans. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact John Morast at jmorast@hrgreen.com or 763.710.1514. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC John W. Morast, PE Regional Director Page 1 of 20 PC AGENDA ITEM – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: July 6, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #22-012 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. & 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Requested Action Launch Properties (“The Applicant”) is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”). The subject property is currently two lots with one building developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would shift the existing lot line towards the west. This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one approximate 4,900 square foot drive- through car wash and one 8,950 square foot multi-tenant retail building. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.48-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site. Lot 1 would be for a new +/- 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash for Rocket Car Wash. Lot 2 would be a multi-tenant building with a +/- 8,950 square foot building developed for Panera (~3,500 square feet), Pacific Dental (~3,000 square feet), and Bank of America (~2,200 square feet). The Subject Property would remain two lots and function as a single entity with shared site operations such as parking, access, snow removal, etc. as part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD). Attachment L Page 2 of 20 The Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC. The site is currently developed as a vacant industrial building with an associated parking lot. This area includes Red Fox and Grey Fox roads and is bounded by Lexington Avenue, Highway 51, Interstate 694, and the Canadian Pacific railway. This area is used by a number of small and large businesses for a variety of retail, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and office uses. This area was largely developed between the 1950s and 1970s, though the retail area along Lexington Avenue has had some new development and redevelopment in the last 15 years. This area is marked as an area of possible redevelopment in 2040. At their April 18, 2022 meeting, the City Council reviewed the concept plan from Launch Properties for the proposed car wash and multi-tenant development on the Subject Property. Since that review, the Applicant has switched the actual car wash occupant from Mister Car Wash to Rocket Car Wash. With this occupant change, the Applicant has modified the building design, building materials, and signage for the car wash site from what was presented during the concept review. This tenant change has resulted in additional requests for flexibility under the PUD as part of this application. 2. History of the Planning Case The Applicant previously applied for redevelopment of this site to construct an Aldi and two- tenant retail building on August 19, 2021 (PC 21-019). At their meeting on September 8, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend approval of Planning Case 21-019 with conditions at the Subject Property for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, and Site Plan Review. At their October 11, 2021 meeting, the City Council voted to deny Planning Case 21-019. Approvals 1. Planned Unit Development A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for all new development and redevelopment in the B-3 District. In addition, a PUD would allow for performance standard flexibility. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. Page 3 of 20 2. Conditional Use Permit In the B-3 District, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for Vehicle – Motorized Service which includes a car wash as a principal use since it provides “maintenance services” for motorized vehicles. Typical factors to consider in evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, noise from equipment (washers, blowers and vacuums), lights from vehicles, and queuing of vehicles waiting for service. The car wash is a drive-through style that will not feature the option for towel dry or interior vacuuming services to customers. Customers will be able to utilize one of the nine (9) self-service vacuums located adjacent to the building upon exiting the car wash. The vacuum stations to top of the hose are approximately 11 ft. tall. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; 6. Adjoining land values; 7. Park dedications where applicable; 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary and Final Plat A. Lot Line Adjustment and Planned Unit Development The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. In the B-3 zoning district, proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites shall use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. A PUD promotes the development of land in a unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. The purpose of the PUD process is to achieve a higher quality and better project than would otherwise be possible if the strict application of the zoning and subdivision requirements were met. The platting process is required to create new parcels of land or to adjust the boundary between two parcels unless otherwise exempted under the ordinance. This application did not meet all of the requirements to be exempt from platting due to their request for flexibility on storefront setbacks. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. Page 4 of 20 The Applicant has submitted a project narrative explaining the proposed project in further detail and where flexibility is being requested. A complete plan set has been submitted for the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master PUD, Final PUD, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for both lots. Existing Lot Configuration: Proposed Final Plat: The lot area requirements for the B-3 Zoning District are a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet and 100 feet of lot width and 130 feet of lot depth. The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 37,882 or 0.87 acre 151 feet 250 feet Adjusted Lot Line Page 5 of 20 It should be noted that the preliminary plat submitted has under the property summary table the lot acreage reversed for the corresponding lots. The above table is correct based on the configuration as presented. This summary table is not shown on the Final Plat so there is no issue with proceeding in the preliminary plat review as submitted. There can be instances in a subdivision review where a preliminary plat layout may be adjusted for lot size or count, as an example, prior to approval of the final plat. Lot 2 is a corner lot with road frontage along Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. A corner lot shall maintain front yard requirements for each street frontage (i.e. on Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the shortest street lot line shall be the front lot line (i.e. Grey Fox Road). On a corner lot, the longest street lot line shall be a side lot line (i.e. Lexington Avenue). Setback requirements will be reviewed later in this report. B. Park Dedication Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Code (Public Use Dedications) states that the City may require as a condition of approval for a Planned Unit Development the dedication of land, or payment in lieu, and park improvement fees if it is determined the project will result in an increased demand for park land or improvements. In establishing the amount required the City is to take into consideration previous payments or dedications for park purposes. The two lots have been previously developed. The Planning Commission may make a recommendation as to whether or not the proposed development will create an additional demand on park land. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. District Provisions (B-3 Service Business District) – Section 1320 Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as Commercial (COM) on the land use plan and is zoned B-3. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM - Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU - Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial The Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment G. The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Lot 2 70,418 or 1.62 acre 230 feet – Lexington Avenue 224 feet – Grey Fox Road 224 to 284 feet – Lexington Avenue 230 to 250 feet – Grey Fox Road Page 6 of 20 Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.12 Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 24% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 128 ft. Grey Fox Road Car Wash: 50 ft. – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. Multi-Tenant: 45 ft. (north) Car Wash: 57 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ 40 ft. (total) Multi-Tenant: 90 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Car Wash: 40 ft. (east) and 63 ft. (west) Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. Lot 1 – 37,882 sq. ft. or 0.87 acre Lot 2 - 70,418 sq. ft. or 1.62 acre Maximum Building Height 35 ft. Multi-Tenant – 22 ft. 4 in. Car Wash – 35 ft. The proposed development seeks flexibility under the Planned Unit Development from the general district provision requirements for minimum landscape lot area. There are additional flexibilities that will be reviewed later in this report. It should be noted that Planning Staff has measured setbacks from the civil plans provided as part of this application on Plan Sheet 300. The Applicant has included in their narrative an illustration that was created as a conceptual site plan which references different distances. For verification of district dimensional standards, Planning Staff evaluated the civil plan set submitted with this land use application. 2. Design Standards - Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Building Positioning – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E of the Arden Hills City Code states “at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line.” The Applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement. The front setback in the B-3 District is 50 feet from the property line. The proposed multi-tenant building will be +/- 58 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and +/- 128 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road. The car wash building does comply with this requirement. As shown in the above table, the Applicant is seeking flexibility for the multi-tenant building on the setback requirements in the B-3 District for building positioning. Page 7 of 20 B. Exterior Materials – Flexibility Requested At least seventy-five (75) percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. Trim and other accent or decorative features may be metal, wood, split faced block, EIFS, or stucco. Metals shall have a matte finish and have visible corner moldings and trim when used on exterior walls. Undesirable materials include simulated brick, vinyl or aluminum siding, sheet or corrugated metal siding, plain concrete blocks or panels, brightly colored metal roofing or canopies, pre-cast tilt-up walls, and mirrored or reflective glass. Building colors shall be muted. Recommended colors include browns, grays, tans, beiges, and dark or muted green, blues, and reds. Bright or brilliant colors and sharply contrasting colors may be used for only accent purposes occupying a maximum of five percent (5%) of building façades. The Applicant is proposing to construct the two buildings of similar materials with distinct design features which is intended to harmonize the development and maintain the City’s focus on high quality and timeless materials. The Planning Commission should evaluate the architectural style and building character based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include, but are not limited to, building and landscaping materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, building components, height, roof-line, and setback. Multi-Tenant Building – Meets Requirements The proposed building elevations consist of brick masonry, cedar fiber cement panels, transparent glass, and metal panels. The Applicant has met the 75% threshold with desired materials on all four elevations between the use of the brick masonry and fiber cement panels. The metal panels have been calculated separately as “other accent or decorative” materials. The Applicant should confirm if the metal panels for both buildings will have a matte finish. Transparent glass is proposed on three elevations with opaque glass only on the north elevation. The multi-tenant building design has a variation in rooflines as an identifier to the individual storefronts with awnings above the entry as well as the front façade facing Grey Fox Road has modulation with the stepping back of each tenant space in the design. The following table shows the breakdown of materials for the multi-tenant building: Required Preferred Materials Proposed Preferred Materials Other Materials Required Transparency Proposed Transparency North Façade 75% 82% 18% N/A 28% (opaque) East Façade 75% 81% 19% 50% 51% South Façade 75% 83% 17% 50% 65% West Façade 75% 83% 17% N/A 33% The transparency requirements for businesses within the B-3 District have been considered in the development and the proposal will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. states that fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. If the building is a one story design and the first floor elevation exceeds 12 feet, then only the first 12 feet shall be included in calculating the façade area. The Applicant has met this requirement on the east side facing Lexington Avenue and on the south side facing Grey Fox Road as shown in the table above. Rendering of North and South Elevations Page 8 of 20 Under Section 1325.05, Subd. 8.J there are requirements for restaurant outdoor seating areas. The Applicant had indicated during the concept review that the fast food restaurant (i.e. Panera) will include an outdoor seating area. The Applicant intends to comply with these requirements. Car Wash Building – Flexibility Requested The proposed building elevations consist of brick masonry, transparent glass, polycarbonate panels, and metal panels. The Planning Commission should review the architectural design of the car wash building and transparency requirements. The Applicant is seeking flexibility on the car wash building with regards to the 75% threshold with desired materials on the north and south elevations and the transparency requirements on the south elevation facing Grey Fox Road. The following table shows the breakdown of materials for the multi-tenant building: Required Preferred Materials Proposed Preferred Materials Other Materials Required Transparency Proposed Transparency North Façade 75% 70% 30% N/A 0% East Façade 75% 91% 9% N/A 19% South Façade 75% 72% 28% 50% 15% West Façade 75% 85% 15% N/A 44% Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, D.1 states that at least 75% percent of the exterior building materials should be made of brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or its synthetic equivalent, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any combination thereof. The Planning Commission should provide comment on whether or not the use of a clear polycarbonate material would be considered acceptable in meeting the 75% threshold with desired materials to satisfy “transparent glass” and to satisfy commercial façade transparency requirements. The Applicant on the building elevation plan sheet for the car wash has shown the north elevation will be constructed with 30% clear polycarbonate and the south elevation is a combination of glass and clear polycarbonate at 45.4%. The Applicant has shown the glass and polycarbonate materials as “Primary” in order to satisfy the building materials and transparency code requirements. Page 9 of 20 Planning Staff has identified the use of clear polycarbonate as a request for flexibility under the PUD for building materials and transparency requirements. In the above table, Planning Staff has separated out the percentage of glass versus polycarbonate materials on the south façade. The square footage of polycarbonate material for the garage door on the south elevation would be the same size as the north elevation so Planning Staff was able to calculate these separately. For this report, the use of clear polycarbonate has been factored under “other materials” and has not been included in the proposed transparency percentage shown in the above table. Under Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F.1, the City may consider a proportional reduction in the transparent window and door requirement on the public street façade if additional transparent glass is used on the remaining sides. The table above identifies the percentage of transparency only as the proposed square footage of glass. Rendering of West and East Elevations Rendering of South and North Elevations Page 10 of 20 A full plan set of building elevations for both buildings is included as Attachment F. The image below identifies the proposed building materials. C. Lighting – Meets Requirements The Zoning Code requires exterior lighting to be consistent in type, design, scale, and color to create unity in the Districts. Exterior lighting for parking lots and buildings shall not be excessive and shall be directed at their intended purposes. The proposed plan includes wall mounted lights around the building, and area lights on 25’ poles in the parking lot and drive aisles. The proposed lighting is consistent with the use and the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that identifies the types of light fixtures and quantities. As shown on the photometric plan the lumen levels exceed 0.4 foot candles as measured at the property lines. The subject parcel is not adjacent to a residential property. As a condition of approval, all lighting shall be downward directed shoebox style with flush lenses. Details about the proposed lighting are found in Attachment I. Planning Staff will add that the Applicant had presented for review the option for a red pinstripe of exterior tube lighting around the building and illumination of the car wash tunnel that would be visible to the roadway. The Applicant did indicate that these have been removed from the final building design. These forms of illumination were not included on the photometric plan or as part of the building elevation review. These forms of lighting and building design have not been included in this review and would not be approved under this application. D. Screening and Fencing – Meets Requirements Screens and fencing help minimize adverse impacts of public nuisances, such as noise. There are two trash enclosures proposed for the Subject Property. The first is located on the northwest corner of the multi-tenant site and will be shared between the two buildings. The second enclosure is located on the north side of the car wash building and houses the mechanical components for the vacuum waste. Both enclosures are proposed to be constructed on three sides using brick with cedar or composite boards for the gates to match materials used on the building. Page 11 of 20 The Applicant has included as part of this submission a sightline study to illustrate the screening of the rooftop mechanical equipment on the multi-tenant building. For the car wash, the elevation plans show the parapet will screen rooftop equipment on the south elevation. Staff recommends including a requirement screening of any rooftop equipment be constructed and located so as to completely screen them from view of adjacent streets as a condition of approval. E. Landscaping – Flexibility Requested Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires a minimum landscape lot area of 25 percent or 27,075 square feet for the Subject Property in the B-3 District. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of 24 percent or 26,125 square feet. The Applicant states that there is virtually no green space on the property as it exists today. The Applicant is also proposing the addition of 25 trees throughout the site. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way of every 40 feet of public street frontage. The proposed development would be required to plant 16 trees along the Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road right-of-way’s. The landscaping plan as submitted complies with the ROW tree planting requirements. Also under Section 1325.04, Subd, 2, the City has width requirements for landscaping on lots used for drive-up windows which have been met with the proposed site plan. A landscape plan is included as Attachment G. F. Snow Storage Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. The Applicant has identified in their civil plans a site plan for snow storage. They are proposing to store snow around the north, south, and west perimeters of the site. During the previous discussions, adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the proposed development. The Applicant had indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. G. Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right- of-way of any public street. The Applicant has satisfied this requirement and has a 20 foot setback from the ROW along Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox Road. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Recommendation Requested Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. The following provisions would apply based on the proposed uses: x Fast Food Restaurant - 15 stacking spaces for each customer pickup window plus 1 for each 2 seats x Business & Professional Offices - 1 parking space for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area. x Clinics – 1 for each doctor or dentist plus 1 for each nurse, technician, or professional and 1 for each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area x Uses Not Specifically Noted – As Determined by the City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission (below are similar land use categories for reference) o Other Business and Industry – 1 for each employee on major shift plus 1 for each vehicle used in conducting the business or 1 for each 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater o Service Station – 3 for each enclosed bay and 1 for each employee The proposed plan would consist of a one-story 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash, and a multi-tenant building with a 3,500 square foot fast food restaurant, a 3,000 square foot dental clinic Page 12 of 20 and a 2,200 square foot bank. The Applicant is proposing 77 parking spaces total for the development. The following table breaks down the off-street parking requirements based on the proposed uses: Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Fast Food Restaurant - 15 stacking spaces for each customer pickup window plus 1 for each 2 seats 60 spaces 30 30 Bank – 1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,210 9 15 Dental Office – 1 space per dentist & technician, and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 3,069* 15 21 Uses Not Specifically Noted – As Determined by the City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission 10 *The parking count for the dental clinic is based upon building square footage and has no allocation towards staffing requirements for the dental clinic. That minimum number may need to be increased based on actual tenant staffing. During the concept review, the Applicant indicated that the car wash will not include the option for customers to exit their vehicle for interior cleaning as part of the services offered. Customers are to remain inside the vehicle through the car wash tunnel and have the option to use the exterior self-service vacuum stations. The floor plan submitted for the car wash has the majority of the square footage dedicated to the equipment area and car wash tunnel. Other spaces identified are one employee office, breakroom, and a 275 square foot space marked as “Member Room”. No additional description on this space was provided in the Applicant’s narrative. The Applicant has stated that since the car wash will not offer the full interior cleaning services, they will have fewer employees onsite and will likely not generate much of a demand for customer parking. They’ve allocated 10 parking spaces for the car wash land use. The Applicant is requesting consideration from the Planning Commission to provide a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the parking plan as presented. Additionally, the Applicant has stated there will be an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, maintenance, etc. Planning Staff has included as a recommended condition of approval that the agreement is reviewed by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. I. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – Meets Requirements Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, P states new building construction shall include construction of a minimum of six (6) foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all right-of-way. The Applicant has indicated they will comply with this requirements and are proposing a six (6) foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. The Applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue but notes that one is planned as part of the Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. The Applicant is proposing a bicycle rack on the south side of the multi-tenant building. The proposed bike rack conforms to zoning requirements in Section 1325.05 Subd, 8, Q. Page 13 of 20 J. Freestanding Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed one freestanding sign measuring up to 100 square feet in area and not exceeding 16 feet in height. Freestanding signs shall be located at least five (5) feet from any property line. The Applicant is proposing a shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site as shown on the site plan in compliance with setbacks requirements. On-premise signage is defined as “A sign whose message is related to the property or the activity and use occurring on the property on which the sign is located. On-premise signs include multi-tenant identification signs that may advertise tenants on different property provided such tenants are within the same approved PUD and parking is shared between properties.” The Applicant would like to utilize this requirement as part of the Master and Final PUD approval. The proposed internally illuminated freestanding sign is 16 feet in height and has a total sign copy area of 98 square feet allocated between the four tenants as illustrated below. The sign plans are shown in Attachment H. In addition, the Applicant is requesting a freestanding sign for Rocket Car Wash along Grey Fox Road. The master sign plan has identified this as directional signage. The city code defines an auxiliary sign as “a sign that provides direction for internal circulation, parking or entry, restrictions on parking, security warnings, or other similar primarily noncommercial signs that are directed at people that are entering, exiting, or on a particular property. Auxiliary signs do not include outdoor advertising signs.” The sign ordinance does not specify the size limitations for an auxiliary sign. The proposed sign is under eight (8) square feet. The Applicant is seeking consideration to allow the second freestanding sign along the roadway of Grey Fox Road. This same freestanding sign will also be installed in two other locations on the north end of the lot. Illustration of Non-Illuminated Monument at Grey Fox Road Sign materials are noted to be consistent with building materials and will consist of fiber cement board and brick. Page 14 of 20 Lastly in evaluating freestanding signs, a fast food restaurant under the city sign code Section 1240.04 is allowed menu board signage. The menu board sign shall be no taller than eight (8) feet, a maximum of 40 square feet, up to two (2) signs are permitted per drive-through lane, and the total surface area of the two signs shall not exceed 40 square feet. The Applicant in their sign plan has two (2) freestanding menu board signs for Panera restaurant. The combined sign area for both is approximately 50 square feet. The Applicant intends to comply with all other requirements of Section 1240.04. Illustration of Digital Menu Board and Digital Preview Board Additionally, the car wash site plan has identified “smart signage” on the point of sale island layout enlarged plan. Planning Staff requested additional detail from the Applicant on this signage. It was indicated that there would up to four digital displays within the drive-through area. Dynamic displays are prohibited except as allowed in Section 1240.04, Menu Board Signs for Fast Food Restaurant uses. The sign code also has a provide for an Applicant to seek a Sign Standard Adjustment through the PUD process, but this provision specifically states it shall not be used to permit dynamic display signage. Planning Staff has communicated a digital menu board would not be allowed for the car wash use under the sign ordinance. The Applicant and Rocket Car Wash have indicated that they are not seeking review of digital signage/digital display at this time for the car wash use. Planning Staff did request an updated site plan and information on how the point of sale transactions will function for the car wash, but that information was not yet been provided. Planning Staff has made the Applicant aware that there are several conflicting statements in their narrative and Master Sign Plan versus the supplemental illustrations of proposed signage that was submitted with this application. The Applicant has requested to proceed with the application review as submitted. Based on the illustrations and sign dimensions identified, Planning Staff has identified that the Applicant is seeking flexibility for freestanding signs. K. Wall Signs – Flexibility Requested Properties in Sign District 5 are allowed wall signs up to 80 square feet. On the multi-tenant building, the Applicant has shown each tenant will have one wall sign on the south (facing Grey Fox Road) and the corner tenant will also have one wall sign on the east (facing Lexington Avenue) elevation. All of the proposed square footages are under 80 square feet and comply with the district requirements. For the car wash, the Applicant is requesting flexibility for additional wall signs and an increase in square footage allowed. The following is a breakdown of proposed wall signage visible from the ROW: Page 15 of 20 x East Elevation: o Rocket Car Wash - 139 sq. ft. o Member Room – 25 sq. ft. o Free Vacuums – 25 sq. ft. x South Elevation: o Rocket Car Wash – 139 sq. ft. o Entrance – 14 sq. ft. Planning Staff did not include in the above summary Signs 8-10 within the drive-through lanes under the canopy because the text is only shown on one side facing north to be visible to approaching customers. Also, on the north elevation there is a wall sign to identify the “exit” of the car wash measuring up to six (6) square feet. The Applicant is requesting signage on the west and north elevations to be allowed as auxiliary signs. All signage for both buildings is noted to be internally lit or non-illuminated. Buildings will be allowed to utilize raceways or individually mounted letters as part of their sign plan. The signage plans are shown in Attachment H. L. Drive-Thru Facilities – Flexibility Requested Section 1325.04 of the Zoning Code lists additional requirements for review of drive-up facilities and automobile service stations. The nearest drive-up facility is the Arby’s, located directly north of the Subject Property. The Applicant is proposing a drive-up window as part of the multi-tenant building and a drive-thru component as part of the car wash. The Planning Commission as part of the land use application review shall require the following conditions to be met in determining site suitability for a drive-up windows and automobile service stations: A. The operation consists of one or more drive-up windows and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows. B. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such businesses using drive-up windows in said building or complex. C. Only one building or architecturally unified complex containing two or more businesses using drive-up windows will be allowed in addition to one freestanding business using a drive-up window. D. The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the appearance and function of the complex or building. E. An architecturally unified complex may consist of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent of providing a unified appearance and function is not compromised. F. The applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the use will not interfere or reduce the safety of non-motorized movements, specifically pedestrian and bicyclists. The Applicant’s proposal includes a drive-up window for the fast food restaurant on the west side of the multi-tenant building. Customers will circulate along the east side (i.e. Lexington Avenue) in two drive-through lanes to accommodate 28 vehicles. With the proposed site layout, the multi- tenant building will feature a dual drive-thru lane running along the east and north sides of the building. These lanes will merge to one lane on the west side of the building where the pickup window will be located. The outermost drive-thru lane will be designated for “pre-order” pickup and the interior lane will be for the traditional menu board ordering. Customers enter the car wash on the north end and wrap around to the west side of the property splitting into three (3) point of sale (POS) lanes before entering the car wash tunnel. Customers Page 16 of 20 leaving the car wash tunnel are exiting on the north side in a circular traffic pattern. It is stated that the car wash will not have a towel dry service. As customers exit out on the northern end, they are immediately wrapping around to the parking spaces to utilize the self-service vacuum stalls that face the car wash. City code states “electronic devices such as loudspeakers or devices, and similar instruments, shall not be located within 50 feet of any adjacent lot regardless of use or zoning district.” In the Applicant’s narrative, they’ve provided an illustration that shows the locations of the proposed menu boards. For Panera, the electronic menu board is shown on the north side of the building. Again, the multi-tenant building is setback 45 feet from the north property line. This need for flexibility was discussed with the Applicant during the concept review. The schematics for Rocket Car Wash include an illustration for the point of sale canopy and island layout which is approximately 25 feet from the west property line. No additional information was included in the submittal on amplification or display features of the automated pay stations for the car wash. As noted above, the Applicant has reference to “smart signage” shown on the point of sale island layout, but has stated that will not be part of this review. Planning Staff did request an updated site plan and operational logistics (i.e. menu board, attendant, pay terminal, loud speakers, etc.) for how the point of sale transactions will function for the car wash. That information was not provided by the time of writing this report. Based on the site plans submitted, the Applicant is seeking flexibility from the requirement for placement of electronic devices. 3. Traffic Study and Site Circulation The site currently has four access points to the Subject Property. The access closest to Lexington Avenue and the westerly access onto the adjacent property are being discounted entirely as part of the proposal. The Applicant intends to utilize two accesses for the proposed development. Access 1 will be located on the north side of Grey Fox Road, approximately 240 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 1 will be aligned with the existing grocery access to the south to minimize conflict areas. Access 2 will also be located on Grey Fox Road, approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lane and one ingress lane. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment J for summary section of report). Lastly during the previous reviews, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer traffic would maneuver around the Subject Property. The Applicant did not provide as part of their submission a plan illustrating vehicle movements. The Public Works Director/City Engineer has requested this information. Additional information will be necessary to evaluate turning radius and may provide additional comment on site functionality once received. The pedestrian routes were identified as part of the civil plan exhibits. 4. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications A public hearing for a CUP and PUD request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: Page 17 of 20 Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 0.12 Maximum Building Height 35 feet Multi-Tenant – 22 ft. 4 in. Car Wash – 35 ft. Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% 24.0% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington Avenue and +/- 128 ft. Grey Fox Road Car Wash: 50 ft. – Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Multi-Tenant: 45 ft. (north) Car Wash: 57 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Multi-Tenant: 90 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Car Wash: 40 ft. (east) and 63 ft. (west) Building Positioning At Front Setback = 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/- 58 ft. – Lexington Minimum Parking Requirements Multi-Tenant – 54 spaces Car Wash - Recommendation from PC 77 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 20 feet Building Façade Transparency 50% transparency at front Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash – south facade Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash – north and south facades Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk & Bike Rack None along Lexington Avenue – Defers to project 6 foot sidewalk – Grey Fox Road Bike Rack – Multi-tenant Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 98 square feet Fast Food Menu Board Signage 40 square feet Approx. 50 square feet Wall Signage Sign District 5 Flexibility Requested Drive-Through Facilities Electronic Devices – 50 feet Multi-Tenant – approx. 45 feet Car Wash – approx. 25 feet Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has provided the Applicant with a comment letter (Attachment K) and all comments shall be adopted herein by reference as a condition of approval. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: Page 18 of 20 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, building positioning, building materials, transparency, drive-through facilities, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Options and Motion Language Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or denial. x Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 22-012 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the July 6, 2022 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. Page 19 of 20 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the June 20, 2022 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of- way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Page 20 of 20 Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. 22. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 23. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. x Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 22- 012 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 6, 2022 Report to the Planning Commission. x Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 22-012 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. x Table: Motion to table of Planning Case 22-012 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on June 24, 2022. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on June 21, 2022. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by August 19, 2022 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Preliminary Plat E. Final Plat F. Building Elevations G. Civil and Landscape Plans H. Signage Plan I. Photometric Plan J. Traffic Study K. Engineering Comment Letter Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JULY 6, 2022 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Vice Chair Jonathan Wicklund called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Vice Chair Jonathan Wicklund Commissioners Shelley Blilie, Joshua Collins, Marcie Jefferys, Arlene Mitchell, Kurt Weber, and Clayton Zimmerman (Alternate). Absent: Chair Paul Vijums and Commissioner Steven Jones. Also present were: City Planner Jessica Jagoe and Councilmember Fran Holmes. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – JUNE 8, 2022 Commissioner Weber moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to approve the June 8, 2022, agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 8, 2022 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Vice Chair Wicklund reviewed two minor changes to the minutes on Page 6 and Page 10. Commissioner Weber requested a change to the minutes on Page 5 noting his statement regarding the North Heights Church request should include he was concerned with the comprehensive plan amendment and including the churches entire parcel. He indicated he also discussed the impact the change would have on the allowed units per acre density. Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Jefferys, to approve the June 8, 2022, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as amended. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). PLANNING CASES ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 2 A. Planning Case 22-012; 3737 Lexington Avenue North and 1133 Grey Fox Road – Launch Properties – Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review – Public Hearing City Planner Jagoe stated Launch Properties (“The Applicant”) is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review for a proposed project on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”). The subject property is currently two lots with one building developed over both lots. The proposal includes a lot reconfiguration that would shift the existing lot line towards the west. This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one approximate 4,900 square foot drive- through car wash and one 8,950 square foot multi-tenant retail building. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required. 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: landscaping, building positioning, building materials, transparency, drive-through facilities, and signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 3 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Vice Chair Wicklund opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Jefferys asked what the code amendment process was. City Planner Jagoe discussed the code amendment process with the Commission. It was noted if the code amendment was approved, it would apply to all future requests regarding menu boards. Commissioner Jefferys questioned if Condition 17 addressed the flexibility being requested. City Planner Jagoe stated Condition 17 reiterated the fact that, if approved,the applicant would have to apply for a separate sign permit. Commissioner Weber inquired if the City would be paying for any of the sidewalk along Lexington Avenue. City Planner Jagoe reported the City would be splitting the cost for the sidewalk along Lexington Avenue 50/50 with the County. Commissioner Weber indicated the purpose of new developments was to have businesses pay for the cost of adjacent infrastructure. He recommended the developer pay for the sidewalk along Lexington Avenue given the fact they are being redone at this time. He then asked how the City defines digital display signs. City Planner Jagoe reviewed how City Code defines digital display signs. Commissioner Weber asked staff for further information regarding the exterior building materials that would be used. Vice Chair Wicklund reported the applicant had provided staff with a product materials board. Commissioner Mitchell questioned if there was a difference between smart and dynamic signs. City Planner Jagoe explained these signs were the same. Commissioner Mitchell discussed the landscaping requirements and noted the applicant would not be meeting the City’s tree requirements. City Planner Jagoe indicated the City’s landscaping and tree requirements were two separate requirements under City Ordinance. The applicant was seeking flexibility to the minimum landscaping lot area requirements. The proposed number of trees along the right-of-way complied. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 4 Commissioner Mitchell commented on how the car wash traffic would flow through the site. She appreciated how there would be no cross traffic problems. Commissioner Collins asked if the menu signs would be handled separately. City Planner Jagoe reported a land use application would be considered separately from a text amendment to allow dynamic display menu boards for businesses other than a fast food restaurant. The applicant is requesting review of the digital menu board signage for Panera under this application and the car wash would need to comply with the current ordinance language for manual menu boards. Sign permits are applied for after this review. Commissioner Collins requested further information regarding the transparency flexibility. City Planner Jagoe reviewed the type of polycarbonate transparent material that would be used at the car wash. She indicated the applicant was requesting to have 45% transparency when the City requires 50%. Commissioner Blilie questioned if there was any reason to believe there would be noise concerns from the car wash. City Planner Jagoe deferred this question to the applicant to explain the car wash and vacuum station operations. Commissioner Zimmerman thanked staff for the detailed report. He noted he was surprised by the car wash request given the small footprint of the site and requested further comment from the applicant regarding this matter. Vice Chair Wicklund opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. Vice Chair Wicklund invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no additional comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. Vice Chair Wicklund invited the applicant to come forward at this time. Bruce Carlson, Senior Vice President of Development for Launch Properties, introduced himself to the Commission. He explained he has been working with staff for the past seven months on this project. He indicated Launch Properties would be the master developer for this PUD and noted this property was currently under contract. He discussed why a car wash was being requested noting the car wash tenant would own their own lot. He stated this site had visibility and accessibility from Lexington Avenue and would work well for the proposed car wash. He noted the proposed car wash was ecofriendly and would use less water than washing a car at home. He commented further on the dynamic display sign that was being requested by Panera. He spoke to the sidewalks that were being constructed by the County and noted land was acquired by the County for this project. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 5 Brian Wordaman, Civil Engineer with Kimley Horn, commented on the landscaping plan and clarified this project met the City’s tree requirements. He reported the City required 16 trees and he was proposing to plant 25 trees. Commissioner Jefferys asked why so much flexibility was being requested for this project given the fact it was new construction. Mr. Carlson explained he has done 70 to 75 site plans for this property trying to meet all of the needs of the tenants. He stated he was not trying to get away with anything, but rather was working to reasonably meet the needs of his tenants in order to move this project forward. He believed he had done really well with this project and stated other projects had been considered and approved by the City with more flexibility than he was requesting. Commissioner Jefferys requested further information regarding signage. Mr. Carlson reported the multi-tenant building required no flexibility for the signage. He commented further on the signage being requested for the car wash. Commissioner Weber inquired if going to three tenants was an option versus having a car wash. Mr. Carlson stated this was not an option because the site did not have enough parking. Commissioner Weber indicated he was not a huge fan of the car wash and would rather see two multi-tenant buildings on this site. He suggested the applicant be required to pay a park dedication fee because this request was not meeting the City’s landscaping requirements. He asked how many employees were expected at the dental office. Mr. Carlson commented he was uncertain at this time but noted the dental tenant would be Pacific Dental. Commissioner Weber feared how the dental office employees and patients would impact the parking situation on this site. Mr. Carlson indicated the dental use was aware of the parking available on the site. He believed the proposed tenants were complimentary to one another and would have different peak use times. He stated there was a delicate balance in order to have the right amount of parking for multi-tenant buildings. Commissioner Weber discussed how the County was working to add greenspace along the sidewalks on Lexington Avenue. He requested further information regarding the signage on the car wash. Mr. Carlson deferred this question to the Rocket Car Wash representatives. Commissioner Mitchell stated she appreciated larger signs on local businesses because they allowed passersby to see them from a safe distance. She asked if having a lot of glass on the car wash was necessary given the nature of the business. She discussed how businesses were moving to dynamic display signs, not only fast food establishments, but car washes too. She ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 6 recommended staff consider this within the code amendment. She commented on the building setback requirements and questioned how the building might be oriented in order to meet City requirements. City Planner Jagoe stated a new configuration would have to be considered to meet City setback requirements. She further discussed the building positioning and site configuration. Commissioner Mitchell commented on the configuration for Lexington Station and stated that property had two entrances. Mr. Carlson explained the gray shadow on this site plan depicts the underground stormwater management plan. He noted all access to this site has to come from Grey Fox Road but noted the site would be welcoming from Lexington Avenue. He discussed how difficult it was to meet all of the City’s requirements for the three different tenants. Commissioner Collins asked if Panera was requesting sign flexibility. City Planner Jagoe indicated Panera was requesting sign flexibility. Mr. Carlson reported he could alter the size of the Panera menu board signs in order to eliminate this flexibility request. City Planner Jagoe explained the Commission could add a condition stating: The free standing signage for the menu boards on the multi-tenant building be compliant with City Code. Commissioner Zimmerman asked what attracted Rocket Car Wash to this site, given the fact the City already had two other car washes. Jeremiah Horder, Rocket Car Wash representative, commented on the demographics and competition in the area. He stated based on the studies there was an unmet demand in the region. He reported Rocket Car Wash would offer a different service than the other car washes in the community. He noted free interior cleaning materials would be provided to members. He stated his clientele was different than those that use an express wash at a gas station. Commissioner Collins questioned what kind of noise would be generated by the car wash. Mr. Horder indicated the vacuums and dryer would generate noise and would be directed away from adjacent properties. He explained noise dampening measures would also be put in place. Commissioner Collins inquired if there would be congestion from the amount of traffic exiting this site from the car wash and Panera. Mr. Horder stated this was taken into consideration. He reported congestion leads to poor experience for customers. He explained an abundance of signage was being considered in order to properly move traffic through the site. Further discussion ensued regarding how traffic would flow in and out of the site. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 7 Commissioner Weber requested further information regarding the polycarbonate material that would be used on the car wash. He questioned if the car wash had a replacement plan in place for the polycarbonate panels. Mr. Horder discussed the material that would be used and noted it was more durable. He noted this type of material has become more popular over the last five to ten years. He indicated these panels were treated with a material in order to keep substances from sticking to the glass. He commented on the rigorous cleaning process that would be followed on a daily, weekly and monthly basis in order to keep the car wash in a pristine condition. Commissioner Weber suggested the City Council require durability test results on the polycarbonate panels that will be used on the car wash. Mr. Horder stated his vendors would be able to provide the Council with this information. Commissioner Weber questioned how many employees the car wash would have. Jason Ricks, Rocket Car Wash representative, reported this site would have approximately 30 employees, but would only have six or seven employees during busy times. He commented on how Rocket Car Wash invests in its communities and worked to conserve water in order to be ecofriendly. He stated he was very proud of his company and the work they do with molding youth for the future. Mr. Horder explained Rocket Car Wash was not a franchise organization, but rather each site is owned and operated. Commissioner Weber requested further information about the member room at the car wash. Mr. Horder described the services that would be provided within the member room, which included mat washers, cleaning supplies and free towels. Further discussion ensued regarding parking on the site. Vice Chair Wicklund reported the applicant is looking for a recommendation from the Commission regarding parking. Mr. Carlson commented he was not requesting flexibility for parking but was meeting the City’s requirements. Commissioner Weber discussed how the building was set back and stated he feared the proposed building signs were too large. He asked if other developments within Arden Hills had flexibility for their wall signs. City Planner Jagoe indicated she was aware that Cub Foods has flexibility for their wall signs, but had not researched how many others or which businesses had received flexibility. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 8 Mr. Carlson stated he believed the signs for Rocket Car Wash were proportionate for the building. He reminded the Commission that the site would have more signage if three tenants were located on that site versus having just one tenant. Commissioner Weber agreed with this statement and stated he did not oppose the proposed signs. Commissioner Jefferys questioned if the proposed signs were standard for Rocket Car Wash. Mr. Horder reported this was the case. Commissioner Jefferys anticipated most businesses in Arden Hills would like larger signs. She stated she was not convinced the applicant could not adjust the sign size in order to meet the City’s sign requirements. She inquired what the hours of operation would be for the car wash. Mr. Horder stated the hours of operation would be 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Commissioner Jefferys asked if the site had adequate space for snow storage. City Planner Jagoe reported the site plan has shown that snow storage space is provided for around the perimeter of the property. Vice Chair Wicklund summarized the comments and questions that had been discussed with the applicant. He asked if a condition should be considered regarding parking stall requirements, park dedication fees, the polycarbonate panels, the city code amendment, and the size of the Rocket Car Wash signage. He requested further information from staff regarding park dedication fees. City Planner Jagoe discussed how the City collected park dedication fees through subdivisions, PUD’s and new developments. She reported these two lots have been previously developed. She indicated if the Commission wanted to make a recommendation regarding the sidewalk costs, this could be made to the City Council and staff would also review the condition with the City Attorney. Vice Chair Wicklund noted the Commission was to make a recommendation regarding the number of parking stalls that should be provided on this site. He indicated if this plan gets approved as presented, all signage would be required to have a sign permit, which would be considered separately from this request. He asked if the Commission had further comments or questions. Commissioner Jefferys stated she believed this was a good use for the site but was concerned with the amount of flexibility that was being requested. Commissioner Weber commented he agreed with this statement but stated he also appreciated the proposed uses that would be on this site. He indicated he supported the City pursuing park dedication fees when possible. He requested the applicant provide staff with further information or test results on the polycarbonate panels. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 9 Commissioner Mitchell stated she wanted the City to set new businesses up to succeed. She discussed how this site was in need of redevelopment and noted she was willing to support the flexibility being requested in order to get the new uses on the property. She believed the Rocket Car Wash signage made sense given the location of the car wash from Lexington Avenue. Commissioner Collins indicated he would like the Panera signage to meet City requirements. He stated he supported the size of the Rocket Car Wash signage. Commissioner Blilie stated these businesses would be a nice addition to the Lexington Avenue area and she supported the size of the Rocket Car Wash signage. Commissioner Zimmerman recommended the developer look at planting islands in the parking lot in order to meet the City’s landscaping requirements. Vice Chair Wicklund commented on all of the moving parts within this request. He thanked the Commission for raising concerns regarding this Planning Case noting these concerns would be brought to the City Council. He indicated he supported this request moving forward to the City Council. Commissioner Jefferys moved and Commissioner Weber seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 22-012 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue North and 1133 Grey Fox Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the twenty-three (23) conditions in the July 6, 2022, report to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Collins moved and Commissioner Weber seconded a motion to add Condition 24 to read: The applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with City Code Section 1240.04. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). Commissioner Jefferys moved a motion to add Condition 25 to read: For those areas where the applicant is requesting flexibility, the applicant must address in detail the barriers to meeting City requirements. The motion failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Weber moved and Commissioner Jefferys seconded a motion to add Condition 25 to read: The applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost of the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as wel l as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. Vice Chair Wicklund stated the City did not require park dedication fees for the development off of Lexington Avenue and Red Fox Road. For this reason he would not be supporting this motion. The motion carried 5-2 (Commissioner Collins and Vice Chair Wicklund opposed). ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 6, 2022 10 Commissioner Mitchell moved a motion to add Condition 26 to read: The City supported the building placement and proposed front setbacks given the shape of the lot. The motion failed for lack of a second. Vice Chair Wicklund asked for a roll call vote. The amended motion carried unanimously (7-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS A. Report from the City Council Councilmember Holmes provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. She encouraged the Commissioners to attend the Commission picnic on Tuesday, July 19 at 6:00 p.m. at Cummings Park. She noted the Council recently approved a City Code change for the drive-in windows. She indicated the Council also held a hearing in order to consider a reduction to the residential speed limit in the City of Arden Hills from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour. She explained the Council approved the garage addition on Valentine Court. She indicated the North Heights Church request was approved by the City Council and commented on the reasons for this support. She reported the Council would be holding a State of City event on September 21 and a cleanup day would be held on October 1. She then provided the Commission with an update on TCAAP. B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests Commissioner Zimmerman thanked staff for providing the Commission with a detailed staff report on the Planning Case that was reviewed this evening. ADJOURN Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Collins, to adjourn the July 6, 2022, Planning Commission Meeting at 8:56 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). Planning Case #22-012 –Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review 1 Proposed Use This development includes the demolition of the existing vacant industrial building and redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, +/-4,900 square foot drive-through car wash and a +/-8,950 square foot multi-tenant building purposed for Panera (~3,500 square feet), Pacific Dental (~ 3,000 square feet) and Bank of America (~2,200 square feet), that will function as one property under the Planned Unit Development. Background •Applicant previously applied for redevelopment of Subject Property on August 19, 2021 (PC 21-019). •Planning Commission recommended approval on October 11, 2021. •City Council voted to deny Planning Case 21-019 on May 24, 2021. •Work Session on April 18, 2022, the City Council reviewed the proposed concept plan from Launch Properties for a standalone car wash and three tenant building. 4 Overview •Redevelopment of a 2.48-acre site •Property is currently owned by STORE Master Funding III, LLC •Parcel zoning -B-3, Service Business District •2040 Comprehensive Plan –Commercial (COM) •Future Land Use designation is for a broad range of retail, shopping, and services to meet the needs of the community and region. Compatible uses such as office buildings are also intended for this area. Retail sales and service are a permitted use within this district. •Drive-in businesses/Drive-up windows/Fast food restaurants and Vehicle – Motorized Service are a conditional use within this district. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North COM -Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Fast Food Restaurant South COM -Commercial B-3 Service Business District Retail/Grocery Store West CMU -Community Mixed Use B-4 Retail Center District Retail and Other Commercial Subdivision Requirements Existing Parcel Boundaries Proposed Lots Lot Square Footage Lot Width Lot Depth Lot 1 37,882 151 ft.250 ft. Lot 2 70,418 230 ft.–Lexington Ave. 224 ft.–Grey Fox Rd. 224 to 284 ft.–Lexington Ave. 230 to 250 ft.–Grey Fox Rd. B-3 Minimum Dimensions: •Lot Area -13,000 sq. ft. •Lot Width -100 ft. •Lot Depth. 130 ft. •The proposed subdivision meets all dimensional requirements. Final Plat Design Standards Building Positioning –Flexibility Requested •Section 1325.05 Subd. 8, E -50% of the largest building on each site shall be constructed at the front setback line. •B-3 District Front Setback -50 feet •Multi-tenant building -58 feet from the property line abutting Lexington Avenue and 128 feet from the property line abutting Grey Fox Road •Car Wash building –18.25 feet of the building constructed at the 50 foot front setback line. Building design is 45.4 feet wide. Applicant would need to construct 22.7 feet of the building at the front setback line to satisfy the 50% requirement. Design Standards Exterior Materials –Meets Requirements •At least 75% must be a combination of brick, masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or equivalent, glass. •Multi-tenant building elevations consist of brick masonry, cedar fiber cement panels, transparent glass, and metal panels. •Multi-tenant building design has 80% or more use of desired materials on all four elevations. Design Standards Transparency –Meets Requirements •50% of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. •Proposed building will use a combination of clear and opaque windows in the building design. •Applicant has met this requirement on the east side facing Lexington Avenue –51% and on the south side facing Grey Fox Road –65%. Design Standards Exterior Materials –Flexibility Requested •At least 75% must be a combination of brick, masonry, tile masonry, natural stone or equivalent, glass. •Applicant notes that the car wash building will consist brick masonry, transparent glass, polycarbonate panels, and metals panels. •The north façade is proposed to be 70% and south façade is 57%. The Applicant is seeking flexibility to consider polycarbonate panels as an acceptable in meeting the 75% threshold. Design Standards Transparency –Flexibility Requested •50% of all first level building façades that front a public street shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of interior uses and activities. •Applicant is seeking flexibility on the south elevation for a combination of 15% glass and 30 % clear polycarbonate. Design Standards Landscaping –Meets Requirements •B-3 minimum landscape lot area –25% •Applicant submitted revised landscaping plan compliant with city code. Design Standards Parking –PC Recommended Approval •Proposed site plan complies with off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the ROW of any public street. •Applicant has stated there will be an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, property maintenance, etc. •Proposing –77 parking spaces •1 electric vehicle charging station located on the multi-tenant lot in the SW corner of the parking lot. Land Use Proposed Square Footage Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Fast Food Restaurant -15 stacking spaces for each customer pickup window plus 1 for each 2 seats 60 spaces 30 30 Bank –1 space per 250 SF of gross floor area 2,210 9 15 Dental Office –1 space per dentist & technician,and 1 space per 200 SF of gross floor area 3,069 22 22 Uses Not Specifically Noted –As Determined by the City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission 10 Design Standards Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation –Meets Requirements •Minimum 6 foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in all ROW. •Proposed 6 foot concrete sidewalk along Grey Fox Road. •Applicant is not proposing a sidewalk along Lexington Avenue and notes this will be part of the Lexington Avenue Public Improvement Project. •Planning Commission recommended City Council consideration of a condition that the Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. •Bicycle rack on the south side of the multi-tenant building complies. Design Standards Snow Storage •Adequate area should be designed for snow storage such that clear visibility shall be afforded from the property to any public street. •Applicant is proposing to store snow around the north, south, and west perimeters of the site. •Adequate snow storage and/or removal of snow was a concern with the previously proposed development. •Applicant has indicated that the upkeep of landscaping, parking lot maintenance, and snow removal would be shared services between the two properties. Design Standards Freestanding Signs –Meets Requirements •Sign District 5 requirements: •Up to 100 square feet in area •Max 16’ in height •Monument type with solid base of brick, match materials building •Material of the base must extend at least 1/2 way up the sides of the sign face •Total area of sign cannot exceed 1.5 times permitted sign copy area •Auxiliary sign requirements: •Max 8 square feet in area •Max 8’ in height •Proposed shared monument sign in the SE corner of the site : •95 square feet •16’ height •Proposed auxiliary freestanding sign on Grey Fox Road for car wash: •8 square feet •3’4” height •Brick base materials added to match building design Design Standards Freestanding Signs –Intent to Comply •Menu Board Signs: •Up to 40 square feet in area •Max 8’ in height •Up to 2 permitted and total surface area of the 2 signs shall not exceed 40 square feet •Proposed Menu Board Signs: •2 menu board signs for Panera •Planning Commission recommendation “the Applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with Section 1240.04.” •Applicant updated narrative states “all menu boards shall comply with City of Arden Hills code in size and design.” No new rendering submitted. •Dynamic signs prohibited except as provided in Section 1240.04, Menu Boards for Fast Food Restaurant Uses. •Section 1260.01 Sign Standard Adjustments allows flexibility for sign standards through PUD process, but specifically states “this provision shall not be used to permit dynamic display signage”. •Car wash site plan has identified “smart signage” on the point of sale island layout plan. May not be approved through this application. Applicant intends to seek a code amendment. Car wash would need to comply with Manual Changeable Message Sign provisions. Menu Boards Reviewed by PC on 7/6/22 Design Standards East Elevation South Elevation South and East Elevation Wall Signs –Flexibility Requested •Code allows wall signs up to 80 square feet •Wall signs will be internally lit or non-illuminated •Raceway and individually mounted letters •Applicant updated narrative requests “to allow 139 square feet in signs on the south and east elevation rather than 80 square feet.” •Master Sign Plan: •Multi-Tenant : •1 sign under 80 square feet each tenant space •Car Wash: •East Elevation: •Rocket Car Wash -139 sq. ft. •Member Room –25 sq. ft. •Free Vacuums –25 sq. ft. •South Elevation: •Rocket Car Wash –139 sq. ft. •Entrance –14 sq. ft. Design Standards Drive-Through Facilities –Flexibility Requested •City Code Section 1325.04 recently amended to allow review based on site suitability through the PUD process. •City code states “electronic devices such as loudspeakers or devices, and similar instruments, shall not be located within 50 feet of any adjacent lot regardless of use or zoning district.” •Panera has a digital menu board on the north side of the building. The multi-tenant building is setback 44 feet from the north property line. •Rocket Car Wash has a point of sale canopy for 3 drive-through lanes that is approximately 25 feet from the west property line. Design Standards Traffic Study and Site Circulation •Applicant intends to utilize 2 accesses and remove 2. •Access 1 is approximately 240 feet west of Lexington Avenue with one egress lane and one ingress lane. This access aligns with Cub Foods access to the south to minimize conflict areas. •Access 2 is approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue with one egress lane and one ingress lane. Conditional Use Permit •B-3 District requires a Conditional Use Permit for: •Drive-up Windows •Vehicle –Motorized Service •Car wash as a principal use is “maintenance services” for motorized vehicles. •Factors to consider may be hours of operation, noise from equipment (washers, blowers and vacuums), lights from vehicles, and queuing of vehicles waiting for service. •Car wash daily hours of operation will be 7 AM to 9 PM. •“Members only room” is for monthly membership customers to access free perks such as floor mat washing equipment, cleaning products, and drying towels. •Customers will be able to utilize self-service vacuums located adjacent to the building upon exiting the car wash. •9 vacuum stations, approx. 11 ft. tall. •Rocket Car Wash will install sound dampening equipment in the car wash and completes daily/monthly maintenance on the polycarbonate doors. •Sound study submitted for Rocket Car Wash. •No information included on the polycarbonate material for durability, warranty, and maintenance practices. 22 Ordinance Requirements B-3 District Standards Proposed Development Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)0.8 0.12 Maximum Building Height 35 feet Multi-Tenant –22 ft. 4 in. Car Wash –35 ft. Maximum Structure Coverage 40%12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25%25% Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/-58 ft. –Lexington Avenue and +/-128 ft. Grey Fox Road Car Wash: 50 ft. –Grey Fox Road Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Multi-Tenant: 45 ft. (north) Car Wash: 57 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 feet (min)/ 40 feet (total) Multi-Tenant: 90 ft. (min) / N/A corner lot (total) Car Wash: 40 ft. (east) and 63 ft. (west) Building Positioning At Front Setback = 50 feet Multi-Tenant: +/-58 ft. –Lexington, +/-130 ft. –Grey Fox Road Car Wash: Less than 50% at 50 ft. Minimum Parking Requirements Multi-Tenant –54 spaces Car Wash -Recommendation from PC 77 total stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 20 feet Building Façade Transparency 50% transparency at front Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash –south facade Building Materials 75% brick, tile, natural stone, decorative concrete, transparent glass or any combination thereof Seeking flexibility on single-tenant car wash –north and south facades Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 6 foot sidewalk & Bike Rack None along Lexington Avenue –Defers to project 6 foot sidewalk –Grey Fox Road Bike Rack –Multi-tenant Freestanding Sign Copy Area 100 square feet 95 square feet Fast Food Menu Board Signage 40 square feet Intends to Comply Wall Signage Sign District 5 Flexibility Requested Drive-Through Facilities Electronic Devices –50 feet Multi-Tenant –approx. 44 feet Car Wash –approx. 25 feet Plan Evaluation Summary Public Notice •Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on July 14, 2022. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. •No comments received. Planning Case 22-012 –Launch Properties 24 Questions? Page 1 of 6 NEW BUSINESS – 9A MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #22-012 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. & 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for the Launch Properties Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road to redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one approximate 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash and one 8,950 square foot multi-tenant retail building. Approval of a PUD requires an affirmative vote of four councilmembers. Background The Applicant has submitted a land use application for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review, proposing to redevelop a 2.48-acre site located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road. The site is currently developed with a vacant industrial building and associated parking lot. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and redevelop the site. Lot 1 would be for a new +/- 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash for Rocket Car Wash. Lot Page 2 of 6 2 would be a multi-tenant building with a +/- 8,950 square foot building developed for Panera (~3,500 square feet), Pacific Dental (~3,000 square feet), and Bank of America (~2,200 square feet). The Subject Property would remain two lots and function as a single entity with shared site operations such as parking, access, snow removal, etc. as part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD). Requested Action 1. Planned Unit Development A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required for all new development and redevelopment in the B-3 District. In addition, a PUD would allow for performance standard flexibility. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. 2. Conditional Use Permit A Conditional Use Permit is required for Drive-in businesses/Drive-up windows/Fast food restaurants and Vehicle – Motorized Service which includes a car wash as a principal use since it provides “maintenance services” for motorized vehicles in the B-3 district. Typical factors to consider in evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, noise from equipment (washers, blowers and vacuums), lights from vehicles, and queuing of vehicles waiting for service. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; 6. Adjoining land values; 7. Park dedications where applicable; 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their July 6, 2022 meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration: 1. The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required. Page 3 of 6 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: building positioning, building materials, transparency, drive-through facilities, and wall signage. 9. A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 10. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 6, 2022. Options and Motion Language The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their July 6, 2022 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval with conditions of the Launch Properties application for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review by a 7-0 vote. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider. 1. Approve with Conditions: Motion to approve Planning Case 22-012 and Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. Page 4 of 6 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the June 20, 2022 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right- of- way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. Page 5 of 6 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. 22. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 23. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 24. The Applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with Section 1240.04. 25. The Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. 2. Approve as Submitted: Motion to approve Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council. 3. Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on June 21, 2022. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by August 19, 2022 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Page 6 of 6 Attachments A. Resolution 2022-039, 3737 Lexington Avenue N. B. Resolution 2022-040 1133 Grey Fox Road C. City Council Presentation To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-039 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 3737 LEXINGTON AVENUE N. WHEREAS, City Staff received a complete land use application for 3737 Lexington Avenue N (“Subject Property”) as part of a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit on June 21, 2022; WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the B-3 – Service Business Zoning District and is guided as Commercial in the Land Use plan; WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for a drive-up window in the B-3 Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested as part of the Final Planned Unit Development a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a drive-up window as part of a fast food restaurant; WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 1000 feet of Subject Property when a request for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that requires a public hearing; WHEREAS, the City’s obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on July 6, 2022. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant’s request for a Conditional Use Permit and, as such voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2022-039 approving Planning Case 22-012 for a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit at the Subject Property 3737 Lexington Avenue N. to allow a drive-up window as part of a fast food restaurant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council approves Planning Case 22-012 for a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit on the Subject Property 3737 Lexington Avenue N. based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 2 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the June 20, 2022 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 3 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right- of- way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. 22. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 23. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 24. The Applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with Section 1240.04. 25. The Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 2022. ________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-040 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1133 GREY FOX ROAD WHEREAS, City Staff received a complete land use application for 1133 Grey Fox Road (“Subject Property”) as part of a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit on June 21, 2022; WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the B-3 – Service Business Zoning District and is guided as Commercial in the Land Use plan; WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for a vehicle-motorized service in the B-3 Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested as part of the Final Planned Unit Development a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a vehicle-motorized service for a standalone drive- through car wash; WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 1000 feet of Subject Property when a request for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that requires a public hearing; WHEREAS, the City’s obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on July 6, 2022. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant’s request for a Conditional Use Permit and, as such voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2022-040 approving Planning Case 22-012 for a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit at the Subject Property 1133 Grey Fox Road to allow vehicle-motorized service for a standalone drive-through car wash. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council approves Planning Case 22-012 for a Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit on the Subject Property at 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 2 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the June 20, 2022 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 12. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 13. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 3 14. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right- of- way. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. 22. The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 23. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 24. The Applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with Section 1240.04. 25. The Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 25th DAY OF JULY, 2022. ________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Planning Case #22-012 –Public Hearing Required Applicant: Launch Properties Property Location: 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road Request: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Actions to Consider •Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for the Launch Properties Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review on 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road to redevelop the parcels with two separate one-story buildings, one approximate 4,900 square foot drive-through car wash and one 8,950 square foot multi- tenant retail building. 2 Findings of Fact 1.The property located at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road is designated for Commercial uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2.New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3.For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required. 4.The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5.The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development in order to develop the property with shared access, parking, and maintenance between the two parcels. 6.The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 7.Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the Applicant. 8.Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: building positioning, building materials, transparency, drive-through facilities, and wall signage. 9.A public hearing for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 10.The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 6, 2022. Deadline for Agency Action •The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on June 21, 2022. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by August 19, 2022 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. With consent of the applicant, the City may extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Options and Motion Language •Approve with Conditions:Motion to approve Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the 25 conditions in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council: •Approve as Submitted: Motion to approve Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022-040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the July 25, 2022 Report to the City Council. •Denial:Motion to deny Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022- 040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. •Table:Motion to table of Planning Case 22-012 and adoption of Resolution 2022-039 and Resolution 2022- 040 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Site Plan Review at 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. PC Recommended Conditions 1.The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2.The Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3.A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code, and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4.A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5.The applicant shall file the Final Plat with Ramsey County within 180 days of the approval from the City. 6.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7.A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County prior to the start of any site activities. 8.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the June 20, 2022 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 9.The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit. 10.Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and City Planner prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 11.Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 12.Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. PC Recommended Conditions, cont’d. 13.The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 14.A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City right-of way. 15.All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16.All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17.A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18.Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19.The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20.All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21.The Applicant shall provide an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the site access, parking areas, landscaping, snow removal and common areas for the City Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the Master and Final PUD Development Agreement. 22.The proposed structures shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 23.The Applicant shall provide a copy of the Stormwater Management Report and verification of Rice Creek Watershed approval prior to the approval of Development Agreement. 24.The Applicant shall reduce the menu board signage for the fast food restaurant in the multi-tenant building to be compliant with Section 1240.04. 25.The Applicant shall be required to pay a park dedication fee equivalent to the City’s portion of the cost for the sidewalk installation along Lexington Avenue as part of the Lexington Avenue Road Improvement Project as well as the supplementary difference of landscaping coverage in lieu of plantings. Planning Case 22-012 –Launch Properties, 3737 Lexington Avenue N. and 1133 Grey Fox Road Questions?