Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-23-2002 PTRC Agenda ,,,A EN HILLS AGENDA PARKS, TRAILS, & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 239 2002 ** 7:00 P.M. ** ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 PICNIC AT 6:00 P.M. Hamburgers, hotdogs, brats, pop, chips, etc., provided. Chairperson Straumann will be the cook. If everyone could bring a dessert that would be great. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call • 2. Approve May 21, 2002 and June 11, 2002 Minutes 3. Parks & Recreation Updates 4. Council Update 5. Park Signage 6. Park Building Design 7. Park Benches 8. Boy Scout/Girl Scout Projects Floral Park 9. Next Meeting Agenda 10. Other Items for Discussion 11. Adjourn **If you are unable to attend this meeting please call Tom: (651) 634-5133 or Rich: (651) 636-1796** PTRC 2002 Schedule Meeting dates, times and locations are subject to change. July 23 PTRC meeting 7:00 P.M. August NO PTRC MEETING September 24 PTRC meeting 7:00 P.M. October 22 PTRC meeting 7:00 P.M. November 26 PTRC meeting 7:00 P.M. December 17 PTRC meeting 7:00 P.M. ,,-AI�EN��HILLS MINUTES PARKS,TRAILS & RECREATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY,MAY 21,2002,7:00 P.M. ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 CALL TO ORDER Chair Straumann called the May 21, 2002 meeting of the Parks,Trails and Recreation Committee to order at 7:07 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Rich Straumann,Jim Crassweller,Bill Henry,Don Messerly, Roberta Thompson, and Steve Zilmer. OTHERS PRESENT: ; Steve Weismann from Ingraham and Associates (to present the final Park Comp Plan),Tom Moore,Director of Operations and Maintenance and Julie Bateman, • Recording Secretary. MEMBERS ABSENT: Cindy Garretson,Patrick Krenn, Lou Speggen, Michelle Olson, Recreation Program Supervisor, and Councilmember Gregg Larson. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Agenda was approved by consensus. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The April 23, 2002 Minutes were approved as presented. PARKS AND RECREATION UPDATES Tom Moore thanked everyone for participating in the flower garden planting. All City parks have received weed and feed. Buckthorn removal within the City has been implemented.The residents cut and stack the brush and Operations and Maintenance pick it up and turn it into chips for the trails. All warming houses have received an indoor coat of paint. ' Arden Hills Parks,Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 3 May 21,2002 Council Member Henry stated the Committee should provide a list of priorities to the Council including costs, for a specific total of funds,instead of asking the Council to provide a figure. Council Member Thompson stated the Committee should also have suggestions as to where the funds should come from. She stated that the Park Comp Plan is the result of a great effort and is a solid Plan and should be presented as specific goals to the Council. Council Member Crassweller stated the Council needs to commit to the Plan. This has been a 20 year effort. There has never been a Park Comp Plan and the City has not approved any long term goals in the past. Chair Straumann stated the Committee discussed using Valentine Hills as a concept plan.It would be visible and an example of improvements in the future for other parks. He suggested the Committee needs to focus on priorities to present to Council including the cost and funding. Council Member Crassweller stated he believes the Mayor is open to funding for parks and had previously talked about a budget figure per year. He suggested being careful to set priorities that do not limit the goals to one park but include the most urgent issues at all parks. Tom Moore recommended he research costs for the items on the priority list and have another meeting on Tuesday, June 11, 2002,to review the information and decide a plan of action to bring to Council.He will provide the information to Committee Members the week before the meeting. Council Member Henry stated the PTRC has a mission statement that states what the Committee's goals are but not why. He suggests it does not explain the purpose the of the Committee's work. Tom Moore stated the City perhaps will change its mission statement in the future.He stated it is important to explain to Council why the goals are a priority and why they are important to residents. He feels that the Committee members should present the proposal to Council. Chair Straumann inquired about the status of compliance with ADA. Council Member Crassweller suggested that the Committee be firm with Council that it is not an option to respond to ADA standards and provide the costs associated with compliance. Council Member Messerly suggested the priorities should include the list of goals and the ADA, instead of presenting them as two separate issues. Tom Moore stated the June 11, 2002, meeting will include ADA and buckthorn costs in addition to the priority list. Perry, Cummings,Hazelnut and Floral are the four major parks not only by size but by use and activity. These parks all have trail connections. The Committee will discuss the priority order of parks. -SI�EN HILLS MINUTES PARKS, TRAILS & RECREATION COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY,JUNE 11, 2002, 7:00 P.M. ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 CALL TO ORDER Chair Straumann called the June 11, 2002 meeting of the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Rich Straumann, Jim Crassweller, Cindy Garretson, Bill Henry, Don Messerly, Roberta Thompson, and Steve Zilmer. OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Moore, Operations and Maintenance Director; and Bonita Sullivan, Recording Secretary. MEMBERS ABSENT: Patrick Krenn, Lou Speggen, Michelle Olson, Recreation Program Supervisor and Gregg Larson, City Council Liaison. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Agenda was approved by consensus. APPROVAL OF MINUTES NONE PARKS AND RECREATION UPDATES A. Tom Moore—Park Update/Recreation Update Tom Moore stated that the Committee for the 50th is seeking additional volunteers and asked everyone to volunteer for at least an hour. He reviewed the activities and areas where they need volunteers with the Committee. He suggested having an Arden Hills PTRC booth, similar to last year and explained the process to the Committee. He stated that it would be up to the Committee to decide if they would like to have their own booth. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 2 June 11, 2002 • Mr. Moore referenced the Park Fund donation from St. Mary's Romanian Orthodox Church and St. Katherine's Ukrainian Church. B. Open Discussion—Park Committee Funding Priorities Chair Straumann referenced Committee Member Thompson's email suggesting discussion of the park sign recommendations and asked Mr. Moore to clarify the budget and costs for the signs. Mr. Moore referenced Park Fund 227 stating that the fund has approximately $500,000.00 available. He stated that the money could be used for items approved by the Committee. He explained that the Committee's approval would then be presented to City Council for final approval and explained the process to the Committee. He clarified that this fund is different from the General Fund or CIP noting that the advantage of the Park Fund, with Council approval, they could spend all $500,000.00 by the end of year. He further stated that it provides a unique advantage and explained that once it is gone the Committee would have to go through the allocation process. He stated that if the Committee decides that they would like to pursue the sign project he would then get three estimates to present to the Committee for consideration. He provided the Committee with samples of the signs for their review. Committee Member Crassweller stated that he thinks they are doing this backwards. He explained that they would have to ask first what trail connections are necessary to link the • Community. Chair Straumann asked him to clarify what he believes is backward. Committee Member Crassweller clarified that they need to determine their priorities stating that they, as a Committee, should decide first if they want to spend the dollars on signs, a trail connection or park improvements. He further explained that once they determine their priorities then they could begin to make decisions on projects within each priority. He asked if the citizens would get more use out of the signs or by placing a trail connection. Committee Member Thompson agreed that there are several projects that could be completed with the funding. She noted what the Committee has accomplished in the past year in putting together their recommendations for the Comprehensive Plan. She stated that they discussed, as a Committee, ways that allow the residents to see what they have in the way of parks. She explained that many of the residents do not know where all the parks and trails are located. She agreed that they should discuss these issues and determine their priorities as a Committee. She stated that it is critical that the citizens and visitors can see what parks and trails are available in Arden Hills. She stated that the park signs would improve the visibility. Committee Member Crassweller agreed that they should have this discussion. He stated that they couldn't make this decision until they have truly determined their priorities as a Committee and what they want to do with the funding. Chair Straumann clarified that the trail connection for the Mounds View trail system is over $600,000.00. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 3 June 11, 2002 • Committee Member Crassweller re-stated that they should determine their priorities first before they decide on the individual projects and the amounts to spend on them. He further stated that they need to address the more useable items first noting Ingerson Park and the Disk Golf Course. He stated that, based on what would be more useable, that he would prefer the Disk Golf versus the sign. Committee Member Garretson asked if they would need to do the signs all at once. Chair Straumann stated no. Committee Member Garretson stated that she had taken a bike tour of the parks noting that many do not have signs. She stated that without signs it does make it difficult to find and locate the parks and trails. She explained that the smaller trails are not marked at all and agreed that they do need some signage. She stated that she is not sure if the signs should be done all at once or over a period of time. Mr. Moore referenced the sign samples stating that Derek Hannes developed the City logo and did the work for the 50'h logo as well. He stated that Mr. Hannes visited seven or eight cities and with his analysis came up with this design. He stated that the Mayor has asked for a tour of the parks and that the Mayor has also commented on all the good work the Committee has done. Committee Member Crassweller acknowledged that Mr. Moore made a good point noting that they, as a Committee, should consider the Council's interests. He stated that he is willing to go forward with the signage. He acknowledged that many in the Community do not know where all • of the parks in Arden Hills are located other than what is in their immediate neighborhood. He stated that residents have expressed concerns regarding increased usage and traffic as they begin to upgrade the park areas and stated that it is important to consider the concerns of the Community as they move forward. Committee Member Henry clarified that there are many items that contribute to crime levels and usage. Committee Member Thompson expressed her agreement stating that she does not want to be overly conservative in what they decide. Committee Member Henry suggested including a contact number on the signs for residents with questions or feedback. He stated that this would encourage residents to provide feedback to the City. Mr. Moore stated that he would present this idea to Mr. Haines and let him determine how to work it into the design. Chair Straumann asked for clarification of the number of signs for each trail or park and asked the Committee for a motion. Mr. Moore clarified the type of signage that is being considered stating that he can provide further information for Committee review. Chair Straumann suggested that they determine a recommendation that includes the number of signs adding that it would be good to have the numbers available for the next Council Work Session. He stated that this would provide them with an idea or rough estimate for cost purposes. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 4 June 11, 2002 MOTION: Committee Member Crassweller moved and Committee Member Thompson seconded the motion to approve the funding of signage for fiscal year 2002. The motion carried unanimously. Committee Member Crassweller suggested, in addition to signage, that they should recommend something substantial, something that is part of the plan whether it is Frisbee Golf for Ingerson or a bridge connection from Chatham to Perry Island. He stated that they should have at least one item that is a substantial improvement to the entire park or trail system. Committee Member Henry asked if they knew whether Frisbee Golf could be done for $7500.00 and if the residents are ok with it. Mr. Moore stated that they are not clear on how the residents feel. Committee Member Thompson expressed concerns stating that they may not have time to complete it this year. Committee Member Henry clarified his understanding and asked if Committee Member Crassweller's request would be more visionary or substantial and that Frisbee would not fit. Committee Member Crassweller clarified and agreed. He further clarified stating that he believes there are several pieces to this process. He stated that they should choose something that is relatively low cost to work on in addition to a three-year projection. Chair Straumann stated that he, Committee Member Thompson and Mr. Moore met with • designers for an informational meeting. He stated that the architects they met with had developed the park area shelter located at Tony Schmidt Park. He stated that this is the type of structure they would like to see if they develop the athletic complex. He reviewed the structural design with the Committee and suggested that they consider modules for areas such as bath or picnic and shape that area of the park based on the need. He suggested Perry Park or possibly a smaller scale version at Valentine Park. He stated that there are a couple ideas in process where they could ask Council to consider the designs. MOTION: Committee Member Crassweller moved and Committee Member Henry seconded to approve the funding for Frisbee Golf at Ingerson Park in the amount of $7500.00 for fiscal year 2002. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Moore suggested that the next step would be to identify a timeline that would include a neighborhood meeting. MOTION: Committee Member Henry moved and Committee Member Crassweller seconded to approve the request for funding to develop a master plan for park buildings. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Moore stated it would cost approximately$30-60,000.00 for design costs. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 5 June 11, 2002 • Committee Member Thompson stated that it is important to go in with a strong case with Council. She stated that an interesting item presented by the architects is the modular design with respect to placement and how it blends with the landscape. She stated that it assists with the views and that it would be a very nice upgrade for the parks. Chair Straumann stated that he believes that this group of architects is in the ballpark and suggested that committee members visit the Rice Creek ball fields to get an idea of the concepts. Mr. Moore referenced a structure that has dual use for summer as a picnic pavilion and winter as a warming area. He reviewed the area parks where this concept could work stating that the shelter would provide a seasonal use. Committee Member Thompson asked if they are moving towards wanting or needing a structure. Chair Straumann clarified that this is what is being discussed and agreed that the modular structures would provide a seasonal,year round use. Committee Member Thompson stated that there was a need to discuss the structures further and determine the design. Chair Straumann suggested one structure for Valentine Park and Perry Park. He stated that they seem to be setting a scene for trail connections with Perry Park and stated that Hazelnut and • Freeway Park are in need of a structure. He agreed that they would come back to this discussion at later time. He also agreed that they should determine the design first. C. Trails Discussion Committee Member Henry referenced the trail connections at County Road E and Lake Johanna and asked for clarification on the number of connections. Mr. Moore clarified that Lake Johanna is a County road, in terrible shape and in need of improvement. He explained that the County has a turn back program and wants to turn back Lake Johanna Boulevard to Arden Hills. He further explained that the City has stated that it would not take it back until it has been repaired. He explained that it is not a simple project and that it has to be completely redone and within that they would do a trail connection. He stated that this is a major project. Mr. Moore explained that one of the issues is how they plan to do it and reviewed with the Committee. He further explained that they do not have jurisdiction and that they cannot do anything because it is a County road. Committee Member Crassweller clarified his understanding noting that they do not have jurisdiction over Lake Johanna Boulevard. He stated that at one point in time there was discussion to place a trail from Mounds View High School to Old Snelling and asked for clarification of costs. Mr. Moore stated that in 1994-95 it was a County road and it was turned back. He explained that they would place sidewalks free and that the residents voted no to the is sidewalks and trails. He stated that the road was placed and that last year he went to the County and asked for suggestions on how they could place a trail on either side of this road. He stated Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 6 June 11, 2002 • that the answer he received was wetlands, utilities and resident property buyouts. He stated that the infrastructure is made for a specific size road in addition to the wetlands. He stated that this would not have been an issue had they done this project from the start in 1995. He stated that now it would cost the City with respect to property purchase. He stated that there is a definite need for neighborhood hearings. He stated that he has discussed this with Council Members adding that they remembered it was a tough battle. He stated that he received assistance in determiningthe numbers to lace sidewalks or trails. Com mittee Member Crass weller asked for p clarification stating that sidewalks are not trails. Mr. Moore clarified that for spending purposes and building, sidewalks and trails are viewed as the same. Committee Member Crassweller agreed that they might not be able to deal with this issue right now stating that he has a hard time agreeing with the numbers. Committee Member Messerly noted that utility poles would need to be moved adding that this would be extremely expensive. Committee Member Henry noted the lack of considering trails at times when it would be most feasible and asked if they are now considering trails as they identify new development needs. Mr. Moore stated that the Parks Committee has been very proactive and it shows based on their accomplishments. He stated that they now have a document, which is approved by Council, which identifies the vision for the City as far as connecting the City together. Committee Member Henry clarified that someone in position, within planning, would be reviewing this document. Mr. Moore stated that all City Planners would receive a copy and that it is now part of the City files. He stated that they now have a vision that encompasses the City of Arden Hills, as a whole. He stated that it is unfortunate that they are now going to have to pay the cost for decisions made in the past. Committee Member Crassweller stated that if they cannot deal, in the short term, with the connection of trails, that it seems the Committee could make or consider decisions as to what to do with the non-paved surface trails. He stated that they could also consider placement of rock or wood chip, and whether they utilize the Buckthorn removal plan to place wood chips or determine another process. He stated that the feedback from residents is that they do not want all trails paved stating that the Committee should be responsive to this concern. He stated that they need a plan for the non-paved paths and trails. He suggested that they should determine what they would use and the cost. Mr. Moore clarified that the Committee has determined what would be paved and what would remain natural. Committee Member Crassweller clarified that they did not decide how this would be done. Mr. Moore agreed stating that it would be easier to maintain if all trails were one substance. He stated that from a cost standpoint the best would be wood chips as they are readily available and less likely to cause injury. He explained that they are easier to remove and replace. He stated that the product could be recycled. He recommended one substance that would be wood chips and that it could be started this year. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 7 June 11, 2002 MOTION: Committee Member Crassweller moved and Committee Member Garretson seconded to approve the beginning of the natural trails process by utilizing wood chips from old trees. The motion carried unanimously. Committee Member Henry clarified that Buckthorn would not re-germinate. Mr. Moore explained the Buckthorn germination process and assured the Committee that it would not re- germinate. Committee Member Henry asked if the County is going to put a railroad underpass high on the list and if there is anything they need to do. Chair Straumann clarified that the trails already come up at both connections noting it would not be a large issue. Committee Member Crassweller stated that they should determine exactly where the unofficial trail would be placed and connected. He asked for clarification of the costs. Committee Member Messerly stated that this would not happen due to high water issues in the area. Mr. Moore provided an overview stating that it is Ramsey County open space that cannot be touched. He explained that much of the cost is property acquisition noting that most County trails are paved for multipurpose uses. Mr. Moore suggested that the Committee consider the busing situation to Mounds View High School stating that it could have an impact on trails and trail development. He reminded the Committee to note the two-mile busing limit. He referenced discussions around debt adding that there would be more cuts and that this could be the wild card for trail connections. Committee Member Crassweller stated that there has to be a way around connecting Mounds View High School adding that this would be key for students to walk to school. Mr. Moore assured the Committee that the numbers for this connection would cost an enormous amount of money. He explained that the school district has no money to contribute and would end up coming to the City to request assistance. He referenced the utilities, water, sewer and wetland issues stating that he would look further into the issues and provide further clarification for the Committee. D. Chair Straumann—Highway 96 Reconstruct Chair Straumann clarified that the area of Highway 96 would be completed to Highway 10 and that it would have a trail connection. Mr. Moore confirmed that it would have a trail when it is reconstructed. Mr. Moore clarified that the Shorewood Drive Trail would involve Northwestern College noting concerns about opening their campus to the public. He stated that there would probably be a cost and that they have some land acquisition potentials. He further stated that they couldn't control what Northwestern does. Committee Member Crassweller clarified the trail route adding that in order to have a connection on both sides on Shorewood Drive and out to Snelling they would have to place wood chips. Mr. Moore stated that the one issue is access and clarified that there Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 8 June 11, 2002 are differences between official and unofficial trails and what they would be able to do. Committee Member Crassweller clarified the access issues noting that it would be a great connection. Mr. Moore clarified that once again they are dealing with a force they cannot control. He stated that what he is trying to do from Lindey's to 51 is to get this stretch of road reconstructed and add a trail/sidewalk. He stated that it would be much easier to get by tying the project in. Committee Member Crassweller asked how much it costs to install an individual park bench. Mr. Moore stated that it ranges from $600-$900.00 for the bench and installation. Committee Member Crassweller suggested including an item that would include installation of twenty park benches to be placed along various trails, to be decided by the Committee. Mr. Moore stated that if they were to include this item that the costs would decrease. MOTION: Committee Member Crassweller moved and Committee Member Henry seconded to approve the allocation of funds in the amount of$20,000.00 for the placement of 20 park benches and related accessories in parks to be identified by the Committee. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Moore stated that he in the process of doing this with the Boy Scouts. He stated that • presently he is at twelve benches. He reviewed the project with the Committee. He noted Floral Park and the installation of new park equipment and perennial/berm placements stating that the park is beautiful. Committee Member Henry suggested including a contact number for feedback and questions on the back of the benches in addition to the back of the signage. E. $750,000—Round Lake Trail Chair Straumann asked for an update on the Round Lake Trail area. Mr. Moore stated that this involves some property acquisition and reviewed the area with the Committee. Committee Member Messerly stated that the City owns land in this area already and clarified further with the Committee. Committee Member Crassweller stated they should allocate dollars to the Buckthorn removal. He clarified that the plan is to use the Boy Scouts and the wood chips noting that in order to send a serious message they should allocate at least $20,000.00 in the next fiscal year to the Buckthorn Removal program. Mr. Moore clarified that the labor cost would be for Arden Hills staff time to [1p run the equipment. He explained that based on union contract they would have to pay for their time on a Saturday. He explained that the additional costs would be for tools and publications costs for distribution of notification for the affected areas. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 9 June 11, 2002 Committee Member Henry expressed concerns stating that they are setting a potential precedent for paying out of park funds. Committee Member Thompson agreed adding that there are other ways to keep the Buckthorn program moving. The Committee agreed to discuss this issue at a later date. Chair Straumann asked if they were on track for ADA. Mr. Moore confirmed that they are. Committee Member Henry asked for clarification of ADA. Mr. Moore stated that ADA would be updating Perry Park and that it is a major step for the softball and baseball programs. He further stated that by ordering ADA certified wood fiber, this would bring the playground structures up to compliance with ADA standards. He stated that from a long-term standpoint all park structures would have appropriate ramps and structures. He explained that the League of Minnesota Insurance Trust came out and did a playground analysis and has made recommendations with respect to swing sets and seatings that would need replacement. He further explained that the City has purchased only from Miracle Recreation. He stated that Miracle is a locally based company in Hastings,which makes it easy to get parts on short notice. Chair Straumann suggested including replacement of play structures for long term considerations. Mr. Moore stated that he has two Operations and Maintenance employees who will be receiving training in order to become certified playground equipment instructors. F. Park Signage Chair Straumann referenced the Park Renovation section that details trail signage and naming stating that this can be a discussion item at their next work session. Mr. Moore stated that it is City Staff s wish that Guidant Drive be renamed as Cummings Park Drive. Council will have to approve this. Committee Member Messerly clarified that there would be a parking area for Cummings Park. Mr. Moore stated that there would be a parking area available noting that they would have 20-25 parking spots available in the Fair-Isaacs area. Chair Straumann noted the trees. Mr. Moore stated that Friends of the Parks are supplementing the trees. He explained that they are the third highest group to purchase trees adding that they purchased 30-35 trees. Committee Member Henry asked if one can purchase trees through Friends of the Parks for Arden Hills or is it just for Ramsey County. Mr. Moore clarified that anyone can purchase a tree for the City of Arden Hills. Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 10 June 11, 2002 • Committee Member Crassweller stated that he does not want to preserve dollars in a Park Fund and not spend it. Committee Member Henry clarified that what he meant to say was that there are other areas where money can be obtained to purchase trees outside of the Park Fund. Chair Straumann referenced Crepeau Park and asked if they needed to work with MSI. Mr. Moore stated that MSI is beginning their Buckthorn Removal next week. Committee Member Messerly stated that he did not think it was necessary to coordinate anything with MSI in regards to Buckthorn removal. Chair Straumann stated that they should arrange a meeting with the National Guard to discuss access to the area. Committee Member Henry suggested meeting on the property. Mr. Moore stated that he would contact the National Guard to determine the time frame that would work best for them to meet. Chair Straumann stated that he would be out of town in two weeks and would not be available on Tuesday. He reminded the Committee that the Council Work Session is next Monday, June 17, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. He suggested that the Committee meet the next evening or not meet in June. Committee Member Henry suggested no Tuesday meeting in June. Committee Member Thompson agreed and asked for a recap of the meeting via email. Chair Straumann reviewed the agenda content for the meeting scheduled next Monday, June 17, 2002 with the Committee. He explained that the intent would be to introduce who they are and the neighborhood they represent. NEXT MEETING AGENDA Chair Straumann announced that there would not be a PTRC meeting on June 25, 2002. Committee Member Henry agreed that discussion points are good reference for the meeting and are also good to use when talking with the residents about issues. Mr. Moore suggested emphasizing the signs and the numbers. Committee Member Crassweller suggested mentioning in the presentation the features in the plan that has major costs and cannot be funded out of the Park Plan. He stated that it is important to identify these items to Council and to show that they are still on their list and not abandoned ideas. Committee Member Henry suggested presenting this to Guidant as an opportunity. Committee Member Crassweller agreed and reviewed the issues that would need to be addressed at the City level. He stated that there are considerable dollars available to them if they present their issues in a positive fashion. is Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 11 June 11, 2002 OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. Park Comprehensive Plan Update 1. General Fund CIP review Mr. Mr. Moore reviewed years 2002-2007 of the Preliminary General Fund submissions with the Committee. He explained that these items have been provided to Council for consideration within the budget process. He reviewed the equipment requests with the Committee. He stated that in the past the CIP for General Fund was predominately vehicles. 2. Park Fund CIP Mr. Moore reviewed the Park Fund with the Committee stating that he spoke with Larry Holmberg from Ramsey County Parks and Recreation to determine where they are in the process of the Tony Schmidt park trail underpass. He stated that he would have an answer if it was accepted by late August early September. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Chair Straumann adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Bonita Sullivan Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. RECEIVE07 June 18, 2002 JUN 2 1 2OO2 Mr. Tom Moore CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Park and Recreation Director City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794 Dear Tom: Thank you for asking us to submit a proposal for the master planning and concept design for the park facilities in Arden Hills. The time we spent talking about the project at our meeting on June 4 and our tour of the parks greatly helped to understand the task at hand. It is very exciting to be involved in the process of developing a vision for your parks! We feel that our past experience in working on park and recreation facilities and helping clients to masterplan/program their facilities by understanding their vision and needs makes us a natural choice as your design team. We hope to develop a long term relationship with you, the Park and Recreation Department an the city of Arden Hills. Again,we are thrilled that you have asked us to help you and the city in this process. What follows is our understanding of the project and our anticipated services, proposed fees and project schedule. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have questions regarding this proposal or would like additional information, please call us. Sincerely, r 1?m Jerry Hagen,AIA RogelCh tensen, AIA Tim MclLwain,AIA F A x 6 1 2-9 0 4-7 3 6 6 •k A. Project Understanding: Our understanding is that the intent of the proposed project is to develop concept designs for the buildings that have been proposed in Arden Hills' existing parks. This is based on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan for Arden Hills prepared by Ingraham & Associates, dated May 7, 2002. Your stated goal for the project is to develop building site plans, floor plans and exterior elevations for the proposed buildings. It was stated that the parks are currently classified in three categories; Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3. Level 1 is the most highly developed park offering the most amenities with Levels 2 and 3 Parks being smaller and offering fewer facilities. Your intention is that our office study the proposed Level 1 park buildings specifically to the park and site while the proposed buildings in Level 2 and Level 3 buildings be provided with a prototypical building based on the function. Based on the final concept designs, HCM Architects will develop construction cost estimates for the proposed buildings in each park. In addition, you requested that we study a prototype design and identity element for the main park entry signs. It was also determined that the city wants to have a unified design image or language to all it's park buildings. The image would be modeled after the prairie style architecture HCM Architects developed for the Tony Schmidt Regional Park buildings located in Arden Hills. B. Scope of Services: We propose that our services be as follows: 1. Level 1 Parks—Concept Building Designs and Site/ Building Analysis We propose to provide the following concept design work for the Level 1 Parks: - Building/site plans of the areas surrounding the buildings. - Floor plan - Exterior elevations showing materials - Building image/ perspective sketch.We will provide 2 colored renderings total. Your intent is that each individual building's design be specific to each park and building site based on the building's function. The following are the proposed buildings to be looked at in the Level 1 parks: Cummings Park 1. A combination toilet building/warming house/picnic shelter facility. Floral Park 1. A picnic shelter with toilet rooms. Charles Perry Park 1. A picnic shelter with toilet rooms. The shelter may incorporate a full kitchen for events. 2. Warming house with toilets. 3. Reuse/adaptation of the existing warming house for storage. Hazelnut Park 1. Warming house with toilets. 2. Picnic shelter with toilet rooms. 2. Level 2 and Level 3 Parks—Concept Building Prototype Designs We propose to provide prototype concept designs for Level 2 and Level 3 Parks of the building types as follows: A. Small picnic shelter without toilets. B. Medium picnic shelter with toilets. C. A combination picnic shelter and warming house with toilets. We propose to provide the following concept design work for the Level 2 & 3 Parks: - Building/site plans of the areas surrounding the buildings. - Exterior elevations showing materials - Building image/perspective sketch. 3. Prototype Park Entry Sign/Identity Element We propose to provide prototype concept designs for a main park entry sign and identity piece. We will provide a plan and elevations of the design showing materials and graphics. The final deliverables will include the drawings as listed above, a design narrative and an estimate of construction costs for the buildings in a booklet format. The design studies will be done in a hand drawn format to scale. We will have ongoing meetings with you, city staff and committees during the process for your review and input. At the completion of this design effort, we will make a final presentation of the concept designs to the Parks Commission. C. Compensation and Schedule: We propose that we provide architectural services on an hourly basis up to a maximum fee. Hagen, Christensen & MCILWain Architects currently employees the following personnel at the following billable rates: Position Staff Number Billable Rate Registered Architects(Principals) 3 $95 per hour Intern Architects 3 $75 per hour Architectural Draftsperson 1 $75 per hour CAD Draftsperson =/z $50 per hour Administrative =/2 $40 per hour Level 1 Concept Designs: $19,000.00 Schedule TBD Level 2 & Level 3 Prototype Designs $7,000.00 Prototype Sign/Identity Element $3,000.00 Total $29,000.00 Anticipate September finish Additional Services are provided at our established hourly rates at your request. Reimbursable expenses such as mileage, prints, copies, long distance calls, faxes, etc. are not marked up and will be billed at 1.0 times costs. Again,we thank you for giving us this opportunity to work with you. Acceptance If this proposal meets with your approval, please indicate your authorization to proceed by signing the ACCEPTED BY and returning a copy to us. Should this proposal not be accepted within 60 days from the date of proposal or should the scope of the project or services vary from the stated assumptions, Hagen, Christensen & McILwain Architects reserves the right to review and update this proposal as necessary. ACCEPTED BY: DATE: i Minnesota Lawful Gambling LG555 - Government Approval or Acknowledgment For Use of Gambling Funds (previously LG503 and LG265) (10/01) • Organization Information (please print) ` Q#VRCN Organization Name K� t= 1If/ES CJ �.f 1 y o2fif,�0�X License Number _ 4 3 i6Y6 (t:�o (iJ ffw Address 4,eL.cJ if iCCS M,cJ SS t l2 Expenditure Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1. Amount of proposed lawful purpose expenditure $ =9 � _ 2. Check the appropriate expenditure category: Contribution to a unit of govemment -United States,state of Minnesota,or any of its subdivisions, age^ i1 ev-inctnlmPstalities. NOTE: A contribution may not be made directly to a law enforcement or pro _ Awl SAINT KATHERINE UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH 75-562/960 1267 autt POT O' GOLD GAMBLING ACCOUNT 2011187 1600 HVVY. 96 DATE DE w AROEN HILLS, MN- 55112 PAY TO THE 49 ORDER O 11 _Gro, oPi D LARS L+l Di ie�Nationat Bank �651)631-I090 I501"t9 Cowry Read C,Roeevl9e.M1R.155113 MEMO `1:09600 5G 241: 20 1 L L8 ?its - Oath 0 L 2 G 7 • I affirm t result in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to our organlzaclon. • I affirm that when lawful gambling funds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails or for/any wildlife management project for which reimbursement is received from a unit of government,the reimburse- m� nds u� rA deP4s�ed In our lawful gambling account and recorded on the LG1010-Schedule C/D report. Chief executive officer's signs r Phone number Date - - Government Approval/Acknowledgment By signature below, the representative of the unit of government • approves the project as described-above, and/or • acknowledges the contribution,which )willnoot be used for a pension or retirement fund. / [ Unit of 'Government Cr r / 10A " r,l`ILL Phone number 60 J`� 2�5 ,�� b y Cit 4JZOLzJ Address /y�LLS State +•W Zip `01 Z Print Name L— Title U f / f `��1�'4•"L- Signature >� Date 07 l Q-Z 1 2� Keep weepy e*this completed form attached to the LG1010-Schedule C/D in your organization's records. This form will be made available in attemative format(i.e. The information requested on this form will become public large print, Braille)upon request. If you use a TfY,you can information when received by the Board, and will be used to call us by using the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800 62T- determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules 3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-1000. governing lawful gambling activities. For additional information,check our web site at ww.gcb.state.mn.us REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS RECEIVE® MINNESOTA DNR PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER: 2003-3003 JUL 1 6 2002 DATE OF REQUEST: July 9, 2002 S (Note: Comments on this application are Due 30 days from the date of this request. Return Comments to:DNR Waters, Metro Region,1200 Warner Road,St.Paul,MN 55106.) FROM: Travis Germundson PHONE: (651) 772-7910 TO: ❑ City/County Shoreview, Mark Maloney/Arden:Hills;Thomas Moore ❑ Watershed Authority Rice Creek Watershed, Steve Hobbs ❑ Cons.District(SWCD) Ramsey County,Tom Peterson ❑ Corps of Engineers Tim Fell ❑ DNR Wildlife Joan Galli and Bryan Lueth ❑ DNR Fisheries Dave Zappetillo ❑ DNR Eco. Services Wayne Barsted ❑ DNR Fisheries;APM PROPOSAL INFORMATION Applicant: Ramsey County Department of Public Works 0otected Water: Marsden Lake DNR ID#: 62-59P County: Ramsey Project Description: Reconstruction/new construction of CSAH 3 (CRI)between Hamline and Lexington Ave. The project will entail the placement of.82 acres of fill placed within Marsden Lake (62-59P). Replacement will be Through BWSR's Road Replacement Program (Wetland Bank). The area is in the location of know concentrations Of Blanding's Turtles (state listed threatened species). As a result a wildlife tunnel will be created to minimize impacts. Fencing will direct turtles into a 36"concrete arched pipe. COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL Comments on Project by Reviewer(attach separate sheet if needed): Recommendation of Reviewer: Name of Reviewer: Title: Date: 4 ,- -, 'See HELP'directs you to important additional information and assistance in Instructions,page 1. IS THIS AN ORIGINAL OR AMENDED NOTICE? (check one): This is an original notice,dated ❑This is an amended notice,dated 1. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Name of applicant: Ramsey County Department of Public Works Contact person(name and title): Jim Tolaas Complete mailing address: 3377 North Rice Street,St.Paul,MN 55126 Business phone:(651)482-5203 Fax: (651)482-5232 email: 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION(See HELP 2): CSAH 3(County Road I)Reconstruction Also attach PROJECT LOCATOR MAP. 3. LAND USE: Describe existing land use in project area. See HELP 3. Residential, Fire Station,Elementary School,Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant Highways, right-of-ways,Open Space,Utilities,Historic Lepak Farmhouse,light Industrial 4. PROJECT CATEGORY (check all that apply): ® Repair,rehabilitation,reconstruction or replacement of existing roads that impact wetlands(including wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). If so,indicate size of impact(check one): [ ]Less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands [X]Greater than 10,000 square feet of wetlands ❑ New road or modification of an existing road solely to increase traffic capacity impacting any amount of wetland area ❑ River,lake or stream impact(excluding wetland areas of DNR Public Waters) ❑ Placement,maintenance or repair of linear utility projects 5. PROPOSED TIMELINE: Approximate project start date: August 2002 Projected end date: November 2004 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Check all that apply. Also include a detailed overhead view of your plan that clearly depicts the work to be undertaken. See What To Include on Plans(Instructions,page 2). ❑Guardrail improvement El Slope flattening ❑Guardrail improvement with slope flattening ❑Turn lane:improvement of existing or new construction N Resurfacing ❑Bridge work:repair N Culvert work:repair,extension or replacement ❑Bridge work:replacement ❑Stream diversion N Reconstruction(existing roads) N Shoulder work:widening,shoulder widening ❑Additional lanes solely for traffic capacity with ditch grading N New road construction N Other: storm water pond construction ❑Linear utility projects 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,500,500 FUNDING SOURCES (estimate%): Federal_State Local 100 8. SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that could have avoided or minimized impacts to wetlands or water? List at least two alternatives(one of which may be"no_build"or"do nothing'),and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. (If space below is not adequate, attach separate sheet labeled SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS.) See Attachment A.- Z��J - j 1 : i LL\ )_\ \i / C, o = o = o ) . (] \rL _ . . _ CD J e a 2 \ = k o 2 7 o d _ § go § / to � & . C- \ - Q - ( o d � \ § # n § n r 0 $ § k ° ~ § § ^ « ) \ � _ r cc ` / ) � � \ \ _ § $25 _ - \ ]jE \ ° ay �% tJ2 m \ Q a- %) EI : w§ \] § }/ LL ƒ \§ )_// e R ®. § O \ \ e © \ n �§ & -14 cd § { 04 2 o � It fie\ Ob ) } k O 113 \ \§ ® }- a§ \ {\ ' } 13 LL 40a/ u ƒ z en 6 }a m ƒ cn co S /j } ' ~ ® } } \\ a m ; m ; q ; q ; ƒ ; f 11.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that require a COE standard individual permit,attach list of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS that includes complete names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners whose property also adjoins the wetland or water body where the work is being proposed.NA 12, PORTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work already completed? NO If YES,attach DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETED and provide permit numbers if applicable. 13.STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: Attach STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS LIST,including any other permits,reviews or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending,or have already been approved or denied. See HELP 13. See Attachment 14.STATE EAW AND EIS REQUIREMENTS: Are state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact Statements required for this project? (if not known,see HELP 14.) ®not required ❑ yes;indicate status below 15. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply directly or indirectly to either the impact site(s)or the replacement site(s)? (Examples:the presence of endangered species,special fish and wildlife resources,sensitive surface waters,calcareous fens,or waste disposal sites) See HELP 15. ❑ not aware of any special considerations ®yes;attach a list of SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS and include brief descriptions of each consideration listed 16.ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCE DETERMINATIONS: Are you aware of any archaeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys concerning the project or replacement site that are already completed or in process by the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)or others? Yes If YES,please explain below or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. If NO,and if project will use federal or state-aid funds,contact SHPO for a determination. See HELP 16. See Attachment 17. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: A.Wetland banking? NO X YES If YES,check appropriate option(s)below: ® 1.BWSR Road Replacement Program (this option available only for repair,rehabilitation,reconstruction or replacement of existing county,township or city roads) ❑ 2. State Wetland Bank(Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU,or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us. B. Project-specific replacement? X NO YES C.Mitigation considerations? List important site-specific wetland functions,if any,and describe options considered for mitigation of these functions onsite. See Attachment 18. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S)CONSTRUCTION:ATTACH PLAN SHEETS(Complete this section only if you marked"YES"in Section 17B.)See HELP 18 and attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 19.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT(Required only if you marked "YES:in Section 17B): See HELP 19. i 3 2.16.01 ATTACHMENT COMBINED APPLICATION FOR CSAH 3/CR I RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 8. Sequencing Considerations 1. No Build Alternative This alternative includes no upgrades to the existing roadway other than potential future overlays on existing pavement. This alternative does not improve congestion, safety, or geometrics or provide an adequate east-west corridor. The No Build Alternative would not correct the identified deficiencies within the project area and is therefore not feasible. 2. Alternate Location Four location altemates for this project were considered. All location alternates included the elimination of 90 degree turns and installation of traffic signals at the single intersection of CR I and Lexington Avenue. A brief description of the alternates follows: • Alternate 1 included new construction west of Hamline Avenue and east of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of the existing CR I between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternate would require a parkland conversion process, impact 3 acres of wetland, require an on-grade bridge, and require home acquisition. • Alternate 2 included new construction west of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of a portion of the existing CR I east of Hamline Avenue. This alternate would impact 2 acres of wetland, require a parkland conversion process, require a vertical crest on a horizontal curve, and require an on-grade bridge. • Alternate 3 included new construction east of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of a small portion of the existing CR I between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternate would impact 1.2 acres of wetland, require displacement of an established business, require a vertical crest on a horizontal curve, and require an on- grade bridge. • Alternate 4 was the most direct path and included new construction between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternative would impact 3.4 acres of a DNR Protected Water(59P) 3, Chosen Alternative The chosen altemative is an abbreviated version of Alternate 3 described above. This alternative includes reconstruction of existing CR I east of Hamline Avenue and new construction west of Lexington Avenue as indicated on the enclosed plans. This alternative impacts 0.9 acres of wetland. This alternative improves congestion, safety, and geometrics, and provides an adequate east-west corridor. This altemative removes high traffic from the elementary school and signalizes an intersection at which significant congestion and accidents occur. 2.16.01 13. Status of Other Approvals A9 ency Type of Approval Status US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 To be obtained MN Pollution Control Agency NPDES To be obtained Mn/DOT Plan approval To be obtained Arden Hills Plan approval To be obtained Shoreview Plan approval To be obtained Rice Creek Watershed District WCA, storm water plan To be obtained 15. Special Considerations Endangered/Rare Species A request was made to the Department of Natural Resources for a search of the Natural Heritage Database Information System for data regarding the proposed project. One of thirteen known concentrations of Blanding's turtles, a state listed threatened species, is located within the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant, which is located immediately south of the project area. A copy of the letter from the DNR regarding the review of the Natural Heritage Database Information System is attached. A site visit was conducted on May 29, 2002 at which representatives from WSB, Ramsey County Highway Department, DNR, Ramsey County Parks, and the Army National Guard teviewed the project relative to potential impacts to the Blanding's turtles and discussed measures to minimize impacts. Currently, the turtles cross CR I and Hamline to and from nesting areas located north and northwest of the project. Construction of a wildlife tunnel to allow the turtles to travel beneath CR I is proposed and is described under Mitigation Considerations (17. C.) below. Waste Disposal Sites The Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant, a Superfund site, is located immediately south of the project area. Twenty-four known waste disposal areas are scattered within this federal facility of approximately four square miles. 16. Archaeological or Cultural Resource Determinations A Phase II National Register study of the August Lepak House (also known as the Art Larson House) located at 1170 County Road I was completed. This house is eligible for the National register of Historic Places as an important and well-preserved Minnesota farmhouse type. This house rates high in terms of material integrity relative to similar surviving houses. The study determined that there is either no effect or no adverse effect of the County Road I project on the Lepak House since the setting is not critical to the eligibility of the house. Following the study, the alignment of the road was moved further away from the house. • 8 2.1&01 13. C. Mitigation Considerations The wetlands in this area are utilized by the Blanding's turtle, and these turtles are known to travel across County Road I within the project area. To minimize impacts to these turtles, a wildlife tunnel is proposed to allow for turtle migration between the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant located south of CR I and nesting areas located to the north and northwest of the proposed project. The tunnel will allow the turtles to travel beneath the road rather than across the road as they do under existing conditions. The tunnel is proposed to be located at a low point in the topography at which the turtles are likely to travel under existing conditions. Fencing is proposed at specific locations to direct the turtles towards the tunnel in order to increase the likelihood that the turtles will utilize the tunnel. The proposed tunnel is a minimum 36" equivalent concrete arch pipe. This type of pipe has a flat base that will be more conducive to turtle movement than a rounded or ridged pipe. Overall, the size, type, shape, and location of the tunnel has been designed to accommodate turtle migration that is known to occur in the project area. • 9 BUCHEH AV L BIK:HEA m Ate" u BWIERV u A i C � LEXIHGTON: _ OOD J mJ r ¢ v J Vf o u d C, C 'o W P��� �?• 50 m l �4~ ���� 0 4'�NVIf-� / v� ¢ VICKI D CITY PROJECT 20014 12th AVENUE cr• > Qy�` F sHERW000 ao: SHERWOOD RD. / STA413+25.82 BIER"OO9 Q �'f+ , SUw%E0 `�LOIS DR. o (SHOREVIEW o Pa�,Roit DSiItL T. o C5]55�',n{ '[�7'�/ /q�Q} DOREG T d 2 F RlL. W t•z `a!S `� �L i. 4 C'�Wtt�ll PVJ�C�O�W 'v#S 87 RD. pP qP \ C*TH� SI 1 VEN HEATER RIDGE OR. r m HTLLV 1 .- SE �' s ,,pp�.,,,,ppl�����QQcow DN. W i GAL v OAKWO DO P A �P j STA 13#lfiattbN.o00 CT. e OAKWOOD DIL " �P. Cr OF m �• o d d '" u ( < <' Q OAKM Ai r d J o UT AL o J TER ,.:}; c� TERRACE OIL W aaA ST. 41 PVEN A~ O=� z dERT ; d •� 7 C a PREYOOD OR PINEWOOD < DR Co. I =ST 3 3 COUNTY R0. 1 �' TURTLE AT LOR AVE. GR ovE AVE 56.W.LP s < 57.LAKE 22. PARK VIEW OIL 3 _.__ ��• ,�„ .= GAS TON AVE.HODGES LA. 59.EVER 2;PMK VIEW TER. ' '° END CITY PROJECT -� LAKE PIME zs sllvER v1Er of T7014 R27t 12th AVENUE WHITE BIRcr 4�P STA 413+25.82 DR !°�Ea END CITY PROJECT 2001-4 0��°c{ • 12th AVENUE LA BEA&°R•o Turtte STA 413+25.82 4 57. W LAKE ICKS OR o�, Lake ccARDEN HILLS HELSON DR_ 1990 POP. 9.199 m NORTH 2& N. LAKE BEACH CT. �n BIRCH OAKS T70N R23W 29. E. LAKE BEACH CT. 10 1 30. ROBINHOOD CIF u.IL 1990 POP. 3. 1514 MERCURY CI. < \ 32. MAYWOOD ST. BIRCH A.S. \\i `SUNSET CT. �• r ,W� PROJECT LOCATION MAP • FIGURE 1 — LOCATION/PROJECT MAP RAMSEY COUNTY Project Development Report County Road I — Hamline Avenue RAMSEY COUNTY Department of Public Works to Lexington Avenue ;Q r'+- C& ,p t� 3N � / ( {I CL r it 1 l ! r z co r-.._- rr 1 if t 1 r t i i r' 1 1 t 11 i +93 Lu b +33 If f�5 'I � .air �► /h i F I I Q o co p. Q I tL ' T et -�931 I N 0 • � 0 (3f1N3AV 3NI'JWVH)09 HHVSO --- N --- -- - --- - -- --z --- V r - a ------------- 0 C4 C0 CL LU (7E)" Lj ` l UJ- I r LU In C/) ci L i� f 1 1 v.,LU i wV OZ t0co I t Q ID I ! f 1/ tkE 3 i +09 — —a +39 L 1250 Sq Ft(0.03 Acres) •, s=--58t-Li tTEI ^TdE CSAH 3(COUNTY ROAD 1) -------- -80' RT IPEI MYT ASS' -s_ --- --- -- V-1 ,125+�00 +42 1 ----------- '� 1 1; 1 6 I I il�• I I � ikl 4040 Sq Ft(0.09 Acres) ,C 1 II I 4 I t I f I 4 EI No Impacts +1 16 i 1 t T � •. { ,� a , fii t[\Y ,M- w { i I I I 14 I f z I , +91 o � k4 IT 1 3< I co f i ! U E 11 :II 1 IF Wetland Impacts Figure Number 3 CSAH 3 (County Road /) Improvements Ramsey County, Minnesota Wetland Impacts h\0U08-00\Wetl—ds\fiq-03.dgn CITY OF ARDEN HILLS LICENSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING 1 �V TEN PERCENT PROFIT CONTRIBUTION ACTIVITY 2002 M 0 :::::::::............. `�ri� �� a`ti T J ORGAi''IFZA2'I<UISE. IpIONTH IST:."1'R 2�ID TR : : 3RD Q.... ............ ABWA LADY SLIPPER CHAPTER 1 516.83 365.62 FLAHERTY'S ARDEN BOWL 2 850.39 0.00 LICENSE B-03162-003 3 827.22 0.00 TOTAL QTR 2,194.44 365.62 0.00 0.00 2,560.06 NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH ASSOC 1 1,231.78 761.24 BIG TEN SUPPER CLUB 2 408.67 295.48 LICENSE B-01485 3 58754 265.21 TOTAL QTR 2,227.99 1,321.93 0.00 0.00 3,549.92 621 FOUNDATION 1 603.52 1,518.61 POT OF GOLD 2 2,335.61 1,225.01 LICENSE A-04241 3 1,681.71 540.93 TOTAL QTR 4,620.84 3,284.55 0.00 0.00 7,905.39 LIGHT BRIGADE,INC. 1 BLUE FOX 2 LICENSE B-02847 3 TOTAL QTR 293.00 762.52 0.001 0.00 1,055.52 EARTHSTAR PROJECT,INC. 1 POT OF GOLD 2 LICENSE A(LEASE NOT RENEWED) 3 TOTAL QTR 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 ST.KATHERINES UKRANIAN 1 1,406.00 1,521.04 POT OF GOLD 2 1,322.00 472.91 LICENSE A 3 1,367.03 623.58 TOTAL QTR 4,095.03 2,617.53 0.00 0.00 6,712.56 ST MARY'S ROMANIAN ORTHODOX 1 1,441.66 351.62 POT OF GOLD 2 1,170.82 1,141.00 LICENSE A-00489 3 1,099.37 414.77 TOTAL QTR 3,711.85 1,907.391 0.001 0.00 5,619.24 YEAR-TO-DATE 2002 TOTALS 17,143.15 10,259.54 0.00 0.00 27,402.69 533.99 .45 �7 ::;ao lE��,.-.-..s�,.. as i i33 54:s:: LING 10%PROFITICHARITABLE A ACTIVITY � Or�� i� 30,000 ( ! Jl�! JAI- 25.000 LS 1 � .20 20,000 00 4u$6 15,000 10120011 10,000 02002 O1V 'W 5,000 0 (� q,06 Effective 04/01/00,The Light Brigade did not renew their Class A Premises Permit at the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall and St.Mary's Church elected not to renew their Class B Premises Permit at McGuire's in the Holiday Inn North. St.Katherine's Ukranian Orthodox Church was approved for a Class A Premises Permit at the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall on 4/24/00. Effective 09/30/01,the owner of the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall elected not to renew the lease for'Earthstar Project,Inc. Arden Hills Parks,Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 4 May 21, 2002 As an example, it is difficult to consider Freeway a priority even though the warming house • needs replacement because the park is not used much more than 6 weeks a year. Council Member Crassweller stated he had been asked to bring to the attention of the Committee the Hazelnut Sampson diagonal trail and that it is too rough and needs to be replaced. The Committee feels the trail is only a problem for roller blades and it is not meant for roller blades or skateboards. NEXT MEETING AGENDA The next meeting has been scheduled for June 11, 2002, as previously stated. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Council Member Messerly stated that Tom Moore designed the flower gardens and purchased the flowers for planting. It was also his idea to use perennials. Great job! ADJOURN MOTION: Chair Straumann adjourned the meeting at 8:18 p.m. The motion carried unanimously. • Arden Hills Parks,Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 2 May 21,2002 Parks received 25 donated trees which have been planted. The entire City Council participated in the program by donating trees. Recreation Program Supervisor Michelle Olson has begun summer programs and still needs staff for sports programs. COUNCIL UPDATE At the May 20 Worksession Council discussed TCAAP and the steps necessary to induce the Army to release the land. The City of Arden Hills Personnel Policy has been updated and rewritten. The policy had not been revised since 1979. The Council discussed the budget general fund CIP for 2003. This is the first time since 1999 that departments have been included in the decision of items that need to be purchased. PARKS COMP PLAN REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF CIP Steve Weismann from Ingraham and Associates stated the Park Comp Plan is complete. The completed plan is on the consent agenda for the May 28, 2002, Regular City Council meeting. MOTION: Committee Member Crassweller moved and Committee Member Henry seconded �i the motion to approve the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan as finalized and present it to the City Council for approval. The motion carried unanimously. Tom Moore stated $500,000 currently is in the Park Fund budget. This must be spent before asking for money out of the general fund. Committee Member Henry suggested the Committee would agree to spend the $500,000 if the Council can provide a guarantee that additional funds will be provided next year. The Committee feels that if the money is spent on projects like the warming houses on the CIP there will be no funds left for parks and trails unless the Council plans to promise funds. Committee Member Crassweller stated the spend down and the promised park funds should be simultaneous. After the Park Comp Plan is approved the Council also needs to approve the funding for the projects. In the past,there has never been a Park Comp Plan. Chair Straumann stated we should take to the Council the priority projects that the residents have asked for to begin discussion for funding. He suggested the possibility of replacing buildings that could provide multiple uses such as a warming house that could also be used for playgrounds in the summer. a � tiwnesoui REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS I=-a�s RECEIVED •NaBwl Raeou ESOTA DNR PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER: 2003-3003 JUL 1 6 2002 DATE OF REQUEST: July 9, 2002 S (Note: Comments on this application are Due 30 days from the date of this request. Return Comments to:DNR Waters, Metro Region,1200 Warner Road,St.Paul,MN 55106.) FROM: Travis Germundson PHONE: (651) 772-7910 TO: ❑ City/County Shoreview, Mark Maloney/Arden Hills,Thomas Moore ❑ Watershed Authority Rice Creek Watershed, Steve Hobbs ❑ Cons.District(SWCD) Ramsey County,Tom Peterson ❑ Corps of Engineers Tim Fell ❑ DNR Wildlife Joan Galli and Bryan Lueth ❑ DNR Fisheries Dave Zappetillo ❑ DNR Eco. Services Wayne Barsted ❑ DNR Fisheries;APM PROPOSAL INFORMATION Applicant: Ramsey County Department of Public Works otected Water: Marsden Lake DNR ID#: 62-59P County: Ramsey � Project Description: Reconstruction/new construction of CSAH 3 (CRI) between Hamline and Lexington Ave. The project will entail the placement of.82 acres of fill placed within Marsden Lake (62-59P). Replacement will be Through BWSR's Road Replacement Program (Wetland Bank). The area is in the location of know concentrations Of Blanding's Turtles (state listed threatened species). As a result a wildlife tunnel will be created to minimize impacts. Fencing will direct turtles into a 36"concrete arched pipe. COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL Comments on Project by Reviewer(attach separate sheet if needed): Recommendation of Reviewer: Name of Reviewer: Title: Date: 4; s • "See HELP`directs you to important additional information and assistance in Instructions,page 1. IS THIS AN ORIGINAL OR AMENDED NOTICE? (check one): This is an original notice,dated ❑This is an amended notice,dated 1. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Name of applicant: Ramsey County Department of Public Works Contact person(name and title): Jim Tolaas Complete mailing address: 3377 North Rice Street,St.Paul,MN 55126 Business phone:(651)482-5203 Fax: (651)482-5232 email: a 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION(See HELP 2): CSAH 3(County Road 11 Reconstruction Also attach PROJECT LOCATOR MAP. 3. LAND USE: Describe existing land use in project area. See HELP 3. Residential,Fire Station Elementary School,Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant Highways richt-of ways Open Space Utilities Historic Lepak Farmhouse,light industrial s 4. PROJECT CATEGORY (check all that apply): 1 ® Repair,rehabilitation,reconstruction or replacement of existing roads that impact wetlands(including wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). If so,indicate size of impact(check one): [ ]Less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands [X] Greater than 10,000 square feet of wetlands ElNew road or modification of an existing road solely to increase traffic capacity impacting any amount of wetland area ❑ River,lake or stream impact(excluding wetland areas of DNR Public Waters) ❑ Placement,maintenance or repair of linear utility projects 5. PROPOSED TIMELINE: Approximate project start date: August 2002 Projected end date: November 2004 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Check all that apply. Also include a detailed overhead view of your plan that clearly depicts the work to be undertaken. See What To Include on Plans(Instructions,page 2). ❑Guardrail improvement ❑Slope flattening ❑Guardrail improvement with slope flattening ❑Turn lane:improvement of existing or new construction ®Resurfacing ❑Bridge work:repair ®Culvert work:repair,extension or replacement ❑Bridge work:replacement El Stream diversion ®Reconstruction(existing roads) ®Shoulder work:widening,shoulder widening ❑Additional lanes solely for traffic capacity with ditch grading ® New road construction ®Other: storm water pond construction ❑ Linear utility projects 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,500,500 FUNDING SOURCES (estimate%): Federal_State Local 100 8. SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that could have avoided or minimized impacts to wetlands or water? List at least two alternatives(one of which may be"no,build"or"do nothing"),and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. (If space below is not adequate, attach separate sheet labeled SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS.) See Attachment JUN 2002 • o Reic4 91 We* 1 LL Mj _ �} 0 Q �f a o o a o a n\ � a }w . j\ oa = m o § J e o d $ m con Ci ] © _ y 2 a 5 � AS n E a L E E } n § « c CD2 k § C14 § § 04 — § a2 _ w U e% Et \ 22 § f § E2 \k w e2 �c 2 ( i& �a /D § /\ 2_E� §§ ? �6 § � � � / a \ 2 / ( LL ) E ) 2 2 ® m 7 g 7r � § B � §z # ¥ § § § g / 77 § � $\ ( t k _ }� i & )2 . R . B . C . P . y ' $§ ; e /t § §® < � » _ : & u . & o . » w . § w . * ' � e � / \} wo § as (L \7 f )/ \ j \ \ 2 { ] \ \2 « \ J y >. a\ § ' d ) 2 ; d . d ( $ / . a e 11.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that require a COE standard individual permit,attach list of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS that includes complete names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners whose property also adjoins the • wetland or water body where the work is being proposed.NA 12.PORTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work already completed? NO If YES,attach DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETED and provide permit numbers if applicable. 13.STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: Attach STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS LIST,including any other permits,reviews or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending,or have already been approved or denied. See HELP 13. See Attachment 14.STATE EAW AND EIS REQUIREMENTS: Are state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact Statements e required for this protect. (If not known,see HELP 14.) ®not required ❑yes;>indicate status below 15. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply directly or indirectly to either the impact site(s)or the replacement site(s)? (Examples:the presence of endangered species,special fish and wildlife resources,sensitive surface waters,calcareous fens,or waste disposal sites) See HELP 15. ❑not aware of any special considerations ®yes;attach a list of SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS and include brief descriptions of each consideration listed 16.ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCE DETERMINATIONS: Are you aware of any archaeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys concerning the project or replacement site that are already completed or in process by the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)or others? Yes If YES,please explain below or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. If NO,and if project will use federal or state-aid funds,contact SHPO for a determination. See HELP 16. See Attachment 17.HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: • A.Wetland banking? NO X YES If YES,check appropriate option(s)below: ® 1.BWSR Road Replacement Program (this option available only for repair,rehabilitation,reconstruction or replacement of existing county,township or city roads) ❑ 2.State Wetland Bank(Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU,or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us. B. Project-specific replacement? X NO YES C.Mitigation considerations? List important site-specific wetland functions,if any,and describe options considered for mitigation of these functions onsite. See Attachment 18. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S)CONSTRUCTION:ATTACH PLAN SHEETS(Complete this section only if you marked"YES"in Section 17B.)See HELP 18 and attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 19,ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT(Required only if you marked "YES: in Section 1713):See HELP 19. 3 216.01 ATTACHMENT • COMBINED APPLICATION FOR CSAH 3/CR I RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 8. Sequencing Considerations 1. No Build Alternative This alternative includes no upgrades to the existing roadway other than potential future overlays on existing pavement. This alternative does not improve congestion, safety, or geometrics or provide an adequate east-west corridor. The No Build Alternative would not correct the identified deficiencies within the project area and is therefore not feasible. 2. Alternate Location Four location alternates for this project were considered. All location alternates included the elimination of 90 degree turns and installation of traffic signals at the ! single intersection of CR I and Lexington Avenue. A brief description of the alternates follows: • Alternate 1 included new construction west of Hamline Avenue and east of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of the existing CR I between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternate would require a parkland conversion process, impact 3 acres of wetland, require an on-grade bridge, and require home acquisition. • Alternate 2 included new construction west of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of a portion of the existing CR I east of Hamline Avenue. This alternate would impact 2 acres of wetland, require a parkland conversion process, require a vertical crest on a horizontal curve, and require an on-grade bridge. • Alternate 3 included new construction east of Hamline Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue, and reconstruction of a small portion of the existing CR I between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternate would impact 1.2 acres of wetland, require displacement of an established business, require a vertical crest on a horizontal curve, and require an on- grade bridge. • Alternate 4 was the most direct path and included new construction between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. This alternative would impact 3.4 acres of a DNR Protected Water(59P) 3. Chosen Alternative The chosen alternative is an abbreviated version of Altemate 3 described above. This alternative includes reconstruction of existing CR I east of Hamline Avenue and new construction west of Lexington Avenue as indicated on the enclosed plans. This alternative impacts 0.9 acres of wetland. This alternative improves congestion, safety, and geometrics, and provides an adequate east-west corridor. This alternative removes high traffic from the elementary school and signalizes an intersection at which significant congestion and accidents occur. 2.16.01 13. Status of Other Approvals • Agency Type of Approval Status US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 To be obtained MN Pollution Control_Agency NPDES To be obtained Mn/DOT Plan approval To be obtained Arden Hills Plan approval To be obtained Shoreview Plan approval To be obtained Rice Creek Watershed District WCA, storm water plan To be obtained 15. Special Considerations Endangered/Rare Species A request was made to the Department of Natural Resources for a search of the Natural Heritage Database Information System for data regarding the proposed project. One of thirteen known concentrations of Blanding's turtles, a state listed threatened species, is located within the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant, which is located immediately south of the project area. A copy of the letter from the DNR regarding the review of the Natural Heritage Database Information System is attached. A site visit was conducted on May 29, 2002 at which representatives from WSB, Ramsey County Highway Department, DNR, Ramsey County Parks, and the Army • National Guard Yeviewed the project relative to potential impacts to the Blanding's turtles and discussed measures to minimize impacts. Currently, the turtles cross CR I and Hamline to and from nesting areas located north and northwest of the project. Construction of a wildlife tunnel to allow the turtles to travel beneath CR I is proposed and is described under Mitigation Considerations (17. C.) below. Waste Disposal Sites The Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant, a Superfund site, is located immediately south of the project area. Twenty-four known waste disposal areas are scattered within this federal facility of approximately four square miles. 16. Archaeological or Cultural Resource Determinations A Phase II National Register study of the August Lepak House (also known as the Art Larson House) located at 1170 County Road I was completed. This house is eligible for the National register of Historic Places as an important and well-preserved Minnesota farmhouse type. This house rates high in terms of material integrity relative to similar surviving houses. The study determined that there is either no effect or no adverse effect of the County Road I project on the Lepak House since the setting is not critical to the eligibility of the house. Following the study, the alignment of the road was moved further away from the house. • 8 2.16.01 • 17. C. Mitigation Considerations The wetlands in this area are utilized by the Blanding's turtle, and these turtles are known to travel across County Road I within the project area. To minimize impacts to these turtles, a wildlife tunnel is proposed to allow for turtle migration between the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant located south of CR I and nesting areas located to the north and northwest of the proposed project. The tunnel will allow the turtles to travel beneath the road rather than across the road as they do under existing conditions. The tunnel is proposed to be located at a low point in the topography at which the turtles are likely to travel under existing conditions. Fencing is proposed at specific locations to direct the turtles towards the tunnel in order to increase the likelihood that the turtles will utilize the tunnel. The proposed tunnel is a minimum 36" equivalent concrete arch pipe. This type of pipe has a flat base that will be more conducive to turtle movement than a rounded or ridged pipe. Overall, the size, type, shape, and location of the tunnel has been designed to accommodate turtle migration that is known to occur in the project area. • • 9 • cy Y dJ m z BUCHLH AVL_ BUCHER m �, A•+ •• N LEXINGSON BLICKRL u c 4 V f �J£NSW OOD rf i .W.. ¢ N• J 1> o S ST. ti' p�F AVF m u a u K CA m t� ��4• a NVIF- / \ v� VICKI ¢ SIThE ND CITY PROJECT 2001-4 I*! �,� �Oo" �12th AVENUE w Ci, i Q�, Q SHERW000 R0. SHEgYp00 RO• m STA 413+25.82 SHERWOOQ o v1F eS.s1mv�Ew <"LOIS DR. g (SHOREVIE W o �P a'IAR o N R ! _ ti C�j/yCM,Ia�1�(L�'[1�/ 1Lp}' PT']P/�/� a� a r I1n s i J OrS Gj Q L.�YILVII PI\���CIOGUIJ �SS� O D0 W �•.. ohs OR I(3 c► t `ct. t�L cr. = NEC AL ou F 4y SIL VE-ATN� .: SI P 12 VEN HEATHER RIDGE DR. CT-= `m •1 h~w pP• u SER �¢ DR. a = W HILL N OAKWO 00 r N v,P ; STA 1 WOOD , i ,cu a e OAKWOOD DR " 6� ACE °R• m �. 3 o - i ( i d o o.v�P• i OAKW 000 i r d o 0 OYAL o TERRACEt �.:� n TERRACE OR A ST. 41 OR. '^ n o 3 W UE'RT n� 3 d ,yh�' 7 PIIEM < P@EW000 DR o PINEWOOD m DR =STY 3 j c7 j COUNTY R0. I DR. O , CO. R0. TURTLE i O �R���R 3 H AY LOR AVE. H GR OVE AVE. 56.W.LA 22 PARK VIEW DR A ! yP, N GAS TON AVE. 57.LAKE 23. HODGES LA. _ 59.EVER 24. PARK VIEW TER 9 F0 END CITY PROJECT 4 LAKE PD1E OR- zs SILVER VIEW DR i30N R27W 12th AVENUE WHITE BIRCH STA 413+25.82 °R A770�`OWER wAv END CITY PROJECT 2001-4 91 ca+►1"� ct, 12M AVENUE LA BEACH zs DR.4 Tu.t[c �9 ` C. • STA 413+25.82 9 LAKE AKs OR 57. ARDEN BILLS NELSON o L sr. 1990 POP. 9.199 NORTH 28. W. LAKE BEACH CT. u�i BIRCH OAKS T30+R'3Y 29. E. LAKE BEACH CT. LA.R 1990 POP. 3. i.i 30. ROB1NN000 CIR W 15 1� 31. MERCIXiY CiR BIRCHA.S. 72. MAYW000 ST. `SUNSET CT. LAw. I� I 9 PROJECT LOCATION MAP • FIGURE 1 — LOCATION/PROJECT MAP Project Development ReportRAMSEY COUNTy County Rood I — Hamline Avenue RAMSEY COUNTY Department of Public Works to Lexington Avenue r- fA cd Z� imq i % f,�rjl )ICL d LL ' r'r J �1 I(� � ► +93 7 _ 1 wo y 1 b w *33 '•..i 1 'S � it 1 ^_ 1 •�i Ir 1 I° y( i-ti �1 +35 1 ! I j ' N a I o CIR ry IL CCQ co co I +93 CM 0 o (3nN3A`d 3NI-lWVH)05 HVS9 Q O t . •._... -_ lei a 0 �>r d I A N cA W CD LL (TE> '(PE -71 Lj it LQ LU E 'o I 1 F++ i 3 + o•K�` <p J I 1 � ! co E v f• { J N Uj IL /-j/ j � 1 f l _^`•.. '''t,,�S"yr' �d �72 Ft �'yy" ' 1 � V cl I I 1 t 0 i r ~ fir— • i W i �;: 1250 Sq Ft(0.03 Acres) 1 4 ' _ y �_IQ LT f PE7 HWY __ -4-1 r �E1 CSAH 3(COUNTY ROAD i — — - ---er-- --- -+-------' ° --,—.,._ -A„ 04 10' FT (PE3 HVi r -..---I---- �-�^ ',;1 Y / � �r 1 I " I I �2 (PE I HNY ——————————— \\ \ 4040 Sq Ft(0.09 Acres) •'^ J i l �� i t I � !I'� 1 4�L t I + f- i No Impacts 1 • 1 1 � W ! 1 Z • I i 1 a I z i 1 I I+91 00 ii tl 1 1 i LD iI I II I/ .i. Wetland Impacts Figure Number CSAH 3 (County Road I) Improvements Ramsey County, Minnesota Wetland Impacts e:\0110e-00\w4ewds1rig-03.dgn CITY OF ARDEN HILLS LICENSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING TEN PERCENT PROFIT CONTRIBUTION ACTIVITY 2002 • ORGANT2ATTON MflN'C[t:.-iST:."FR .. ._2lYn TR: i1: ABWA LADY SLIPPER CHAPTER 1 516.83 365.62 FLAHERTY'S ARDEN BOWL 2 850.39 0.00 LICENSE B-03162-003 3 827.22 0.00 TOTAL QTR 1 2,194.44 365.62 0.00 0.00 2,560.06 NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH ASSOC 1 1,231.78 761.24 BIG TEN SUPPER CLUB 2 408.67 295.48 LICENSE B-01485 3 587.54 265.21 TOTAL QTR 2,227.99 1,321.93 0.00 0.00 3,549.92 621 FOUNDATION 1 603.52 1,518.61 POT OF GOLD 2 2,335.61 1,225.01 LICENSE A-04241 3 1,681.71 540.93 TOTAL QTR 4,620.84 3,284.55 0.001 0.00 7,905.39 LIGHT BRIGADE,INC. 1 BLUE FOX 2 LICENSE B-02847 3 TOTAL QTR 293.00 762.52 0.00 0.00 1,055.52 EARTHSTAR PROJECT,INC. 1 POT OF GOLD 2 LICENSE A(LEASE NOT RENEWED) 3 TOTAL QTR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ST.KATHERINES UKRANIAN 1 1,406.00 1,521.04 POT OF GOLD 2 1,322.00 472.91 LICENSE A 3 1,367.03 623.58 TOTAL QTR 4,095.03 2,617.53 0.001 0.00 6,712.56 ST MARY'S ROMANIAN ORTHODOX 1 1,441.66 351.62 POT OF GOLD 2 1,170.82 1,141.00 LICENSE A-00489 3 1,099.37 414.77 TOTAL QTR 3,711.85 1,907.39 0.001 O.Ool 5,619,24 YEAR-TO-DATE 2002 TOTALS 1 17,143.151 10,259.541 0.001 0.001 27,402,69 ;AC."['�Ii44.�. I ::.. ......:.......... :.....:.......... z..,SUU.......i1,..r.7........,b..94 .....34,#3��......$�,...�5 ACT'tIAG:2000 ::::::::::::::::::::CHA:::::::: .....>..7-.......12:'r03.0.......o-...�. ......,............,..... �} sue- 10%PRO ITITABLE CONTRIBUT OBLIN '/N ACTIVITY 0;0-1y0l �� 70 25,000 �om 20,000 ®2000 S, aupb pp 15000 [■2001 �w✓ t J 10,000 2002 5,000 0 /L 1 2 3 4 Effective 04/01/00,The Light Brigade did not renew their Class A Premises Permit at the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall and St.Mary's Church elected not to renew their Class B Premises Permit at McGuire's in the Holiday Inn North. St.Katherine's Ukranian Orthodox Church was approved for a Class A Premises Permit at the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall on 4/24/00. Effective 09/30/01,the owner of the Pot O'Gold Bingo Hall elected not to renew the lease for Earthstar Project,Inc.