HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-09-1982 - PTRC Meeting Agenda Minutes of Regular Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting
• Village of Auden Hills
February 9, 1982
V119age Hal ➢
Cali to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7 :05 p .m. by Chair Anderson .
Roll Call
Present : A. Anderson , M. Bergene, J . Dreyling , D. Halva ,
D. Kostishack, J . McTavish, D. Sand
Absent : C . Grudnoske, P . Lippert, M. Olson, T. Sather , M. Wild
Also Present : Councilman D. McAllister
Parks Director J . T. Buckley
Approximately 40 Cummings Park Area Residents
Netahborhood Hearings Cummings_ Park Concept Plan
Buckley opened the meeting with a welcome to visitors , and general
discussion of the history and philosophy of development of Arden
HI ➢ ls parks. Chair Anderson then reviewed the concept plans for
Cummings Park which have been recommended to the Council for appro-
va ➢ . The meeting was then opened to comments from residents :
1 . "You tell us this is to be a neighborhood park -- why Is there
a league size ball field? What the neighborhood would need
and use more is a tes:nis court" . Buckley noted that there are
• presently 09 tennis courts available to Arden Hills residents,
most available tc the public.
2. Many residents Indicated concern about poventtat packing
problems in the cut de sac. . . feel it will be abused , will be
a nuisance, do not want parking in the cul de sac.
3. Use of ControN Data parking lot by league teams wil@ make that
parking lot become a neighborhood nuisance -- how will It be
controlled?
4 . "Who 1s this park supposed to benefit? if it uses Control
Data parking Got, It will be opened to Shoreview residents and
organized teams, not the neighborhoods. "
5. What will it cost to maintain this park after it Is in? Will
this be on tha tax rcl ➢ s? Question whether netghbcvhood kids
r, t ➢ Q be able to use it . (Development costs come fr=cm dedicated
funds , rrainTenance from General Fundl .
6. Parents w M have to drive their young ch ! ldren to the park.
Where w110 they be able to park?
eAt this point , it was noted by McTavish that the larger Industries
have dedicated monies for park development, should be atle to ex-
pect some park service In return, parks are for them as well as
40 Village residents . )
7 . It was understood by residents that Karth Lake is a private
lake; others shoui' d keep off the lake; the public should not •
be allowed to use it . It should be posted .
8. How wilt the teams ( if league size field is put in) be policed?
Are park closing hours closely policed?
9. Nursery Hilt lane and Nursery Hill Court alone have 32 pre-
school children, would like to see play equipment the top
priority, do not see need for league field at this time,
would sucigest changing the time table to Install plzy equipment
first.
10. Do we have a choice of whether we get a deg-eloped park or not?
It is a very nice park the way it Is.
If . Questioned location of warming house; feel it is too far
from parking, looks like it would be an eyesore.
12. Would Barks Conmittee consider a neighborhood survey to see
what the majority of the residents would like in the ;park?
In general discussion, it would seem the neighborhood would like
balance of trails, u.ndisturbed areas, play equipment for young
children, family related activities (volleyball , etc . ) smi, iler
field for 1 -bE! t P , unorc,an i red be- i i games -- and some assu`•ance of
better access to the perk. The Committee was questioned about •
trying to obtain acces_, through Mrs. Cummings ' property. Main
objections are to teagUe size field , and potential parking problems
and policing problems. They suggested a second meeting sc they
can see what Parks Committee eventualiy decides to put in .
After considerable discussion, it was moved by J . McTavish,
seconded by J . Dreyling, that Committee again submit this proposal
as a long range plar: , that we proceed with grading and seeding ,
but only development In imm3dIatO future wi I l be in the play area
and In informal neighbo?hood field , contingent on being able to
work out a parking agreement with Control Data . Notion carried,
four In favor, Bergene , halva opposed. Pationale for opposition :
I . Committee has spent 2- 1 /"2 years developing this plan, has
considered It caref0lly, has submitted It twice to Covr;cJI
already.
2. Only other possible location for another league field is
Hazelnut Park; with closing of public schools, there will be
a necessity for this field.
3. This should be an "Arden Hills" park, as well as a neighbor-
hood park; should provide activities for entire Village as
well as immediate neighborhood .
4 . Developmont as proposed on Concept Plan is Integral to the S
carefully considered ten year pl &n .
5. D. Halva noted that when a recommendation is made by th ' s
Committoe, all avallable input should be considered ,
Including
neighborhood conr.erns, but the recommendation should be made
the wiire park system,
th the basis Of aval iableter cood forto us ; concerns oftthe neighborhood
with atG p
are but one factor In this total information.
It was also noted by 'D• �'•�`is8art'�at the ne developedgbyotheopfanner meetings
wou{should
be hold before concept p
have been helpfui to have this input earlier.
(Committee was retrAnded that an earlier neighborhood meeting was
held In 1979. No objections were voiced at that meeting . )
Committee wilt explore doing complete neighborhood survey on
desires for park devolopment.
Approval of mjnute$ , JanUar_y�12 , 1982
The minutes of January 12 were approved as mailed .
Council Reoort
Councilmen f<4cAllister reported that :
- Because of heavy snOw removal , one of the trucks had an un-
expected S916 maintenance bill .
- Me`ers for Sights on tennis courts at Mounds view High School
are being replaced to rake them more cost effective.
• - Council has approved road through Floral Park, contingent on
developer paying aft costs for construction of the road . Park
dedication from this dovetoper has not been determined .
Objection to this decision was voiced by the Tur,.gles -- felt
it was very poor decision, wiiI be dangerous to neighborhood
childron , and inhii)it access to the parka J . Ddeysacg { noted
that mt-king a decision Bike this -
Illegal and a mad necessary, taking park land for a road -
_
sets a dangerous p!'ecedent that could hurt some parks where
this situation exlats.
D. Halve teat that Council is committed to making decisions on
the basis 04 the gremt(331 good for the entire common ; ty , on the
basis of input of all citizens and consultants, and w)ether
we agroe u l th them cr not , we rea l i xe they rust base their de-
cision on the greatest good for all .
Parks and Recreation ComrnitteE Report
pies are attached for Whose abs3nt .
This was distributed ; col.
Members are asked to read and discuss a"- next meeting .
1982 S _ na_ Pro Spring
.pr1 fro Spring Program was discussed . Commltte� recommends
A prc
Including) tile Bicycla Safety and Roden which was un5ucc35Sful
last year,Including
for better weather this year. Committee recommends
"'• including a Jazz-er-vise class: under Adults and adding 3 CPR course ,
spon 441
W{y.h ore d
pose theS jo/nt
Pa�91
d Program an_ SS k c h rt he
ros
orrR,i t t �d Crvehjc/e one anyo oted t rQcdl send rider J
6Z1 S and ePo ofin f sr'°w s CounClll t S o
� i y°�I Dist t r t PC RamSse Sho es ha aopraka at
I
v
r Apr on �rted` * Cl sl, Coup 'fry been o f Pro,
fee
ee!! Ito coot l 1 fo use o t"al Sc °rid Y She f f f ote file
/l Y u
no mt�er N/®s fo�,`�nat® r �`I /I schoo Cho
6o d et cease n4ln9 th
go dec! a May thI Pro age Is ah and Cuts mbar e
�rd� S J° Y ha S e g►'am Park Ich �s a o f
c®/ ns can be �a uJ;hie a.t /e/ //age art,�e,de/gig ced to
Seth lane de u alth ?st f Ml// is ar /Ose make
They e! cod °us 6 ntll d °utd° or Pr be ab a Mor d I n decl-
wl / B con
nor bce e h�sl h epart�oentac g s.le �Ic® ��*h h
Th�S�c I bore ,5300ep had least has more act hts °O®
et 1 has or $600 f Pa),/�Y team rFc t lon Ifro s;
S`'bmf adJoi. this g some P'a m
tr$d by Shirley rnsd a* I/, o f the room b
THEN Marsha �� P.m. gh/ jag dlP s
WICC EA, 11. /
BE h'RC�.C�C�R *#�
hlgkcH E9?j�C Of ## ** ##
96, THE
pA4kS
P,M. Ati� •
VECE GEC yq TIN
E(_ CCA,M