HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03-23-SWSMayor:
David Grant
lt'
Councilmembers:
�-AEN HILLS
Brenda Holden
Emily Rousseau
Special City Council
Tena Monson
Tom Fabel
Agenda
January 3, 2023
5:00 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651-792-7800
Website:
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.
CALL TO ORDER
1. AGENDA ITEMS
1.A. County Road E And Old Snelling Intersection Improvements Discussion
David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
1.B. TCAAP Process And Term Sheet
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
1.C. Remote Meeting Discussion
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
1.D. Upcoming Items Review: Pay Equity Report And Plat Filing Extension
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
AGENDA ITEM — IA
,-ARZEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 3, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Dave Perrault, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer
SUBJECT: County Rd E and Old Snelling Intersection Improvements
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$757,000 $1,378,300 MSA, PIR, Water Fund,
Sanitary Sewer Fund
Council Should Consider
Council should consider the proposed improvements at the intersection of County Rd E and Old
Snelling Avenue.
Background/Discussion
Ramsey County and Engineering Consultant, SRF, will be presenting an overview of the County
Rd E and Old Snelling Ave Intersection Improvements with the proposed roundabout design.
History of the County Rd E and Old Snelling Intersection Improvements
• 2018 Intersection Control Evaluation Study
• Project postponed due to scheduling with surrounding County Projects and Covid-19
• Ramsey County initiated design Fall 2021
• December 20, 2021 Work Session - 2021 Intersection Control Evaluation Study
Discussion
• February 2, 2022 — Virtual Open -House, presentation and public participation
• March 2022 Work Session — Public Engagement Survey Review
• May 23, 2022 — Resolution of Support for Roundabout Design (approved)
• September 2022 Work Session — Construction Phasing discussion
• October 6, 2022 — Open House
• November 28, 2022 Work Session — Updated construction costs
• December 12, 2022 Work Session — Decision for 2023 Council
Page 1 of 2
SRF has submitted 95% Design plans and anticipating project bidding in March 2023.
Regardless of how Council chooses to move forward with this project, the City's utilities need
improvement.
Budtet Impact
The estimated City costs for the entire project is 82% higher than the budgeted amount in the
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Funding Source
CIP budget
Estimate
Utility Funds
$307,000
$419,800
MSA
$450,000
$891,000
PIR
$0
$67,500
Total
$757,000
$1,378,300
Attachments
Attachment A — Presentation Slides
Attachment B — ROW expense estimate table
Page 2 of 2
= RAMSEY COUNTY
Attachment A
January 3, 2023
y>j4
Snei f
�l�
41d
TOwood
B
ALL :WAY
s
BETHEL . .
UNFVFMITY
rah
71
• rri�� �iiiiirrriir�irirrr,�ii
slop.,..
I�
SM i
t �
� x
Oi
ko,
�nzn�rs Pnse+ tOlF -----
1 i RAMSEY COUNTY Project Background
• Two separate traffic
studies were
conducted (2018
and 2021) at CR E
& Old Snelling that
recommended a
roundabout as the
optimum solution
• County identified
need for project and
initiated design in
Fall 2021
k
4M,3
RAMSEY COUNTY Project Update
Public and Agency Engagement
• Several coordination meetings held with:
— City & County Staff
— Lindey's Steakhouse
— Bethel College & MVSD
— RCW D
— Private Utility Companies
• 2 Public Open Houses (and a project website)
• 2 Resident Meetings (as requested)
• 5 Council Workshops (updates and to gain support)
— City Resolution of Support granted in May, 2022
RAMSEY COUNTY
Highlights From Public Engagement
• Bethel College and
MVSD very supportive of
transportation and safety
improvement
• Residents and Business
directly impacted have
been supportive
• Public Open Houses had
many supporters of
project, and a few not in
support
• Follow up roundabout
educational materials
provided
Project Update
DO- Whv is this nroiect needed
ZE
3 gzas}�.,a.
FAQ
RAMSEY COUNTY
FAQ: Why is a Roundabout being
recommended at this location?
• Best option to provide long-
term congestion relief and
improved safety
• All approaches have similar
traffic volumes
• Provides the best flexibility in
minimizing delays under low
(no waiting for red lights or
stop sign) and high -volume
conditions
• Bonus: Fits well within
available ROW
AW
A J P
011i T--qiMa U.-I iiiMi "a ink • @ •F1i
Function and safety
Aesthetics
Improved visibility
Gateway into community
_. r
FAQ
RAMSEY COUNTY
FAQ: What happens if we do nothing?
• Missed opportunity to improve
this intersection for all users
• The all -way -stop would remain
in -place indefinitely
• If traffic congestion increases,
as expected, the intersection will
operate poorly
• This will also result in longer
traffic backups that cause delay,
frustration, and block driveways
10
1 = RAM S EY COUNTY Project costs
Roundabout cost considerations
• Typically costs higher
than a traffic signal to
construct (but has a
higher benefit)
• Lower long-term
maintenance and
electricity costs over a
traffic signal
• Lower "user costs" (less
idling/emissions, time
savings, lower crash
severity, etc.)
11
RAMSEY COUNTY
Project cost considerations
• City participates in
25% of construction
cost (one leg) plus
watermain and
sanitary sewer
design and
construction
• City participates in
50% of Right -of -Way
and relocation costs
� Cost Participation by leg
Project Costs
12
i Is
City Of'CouJ 0 .0 0 1nty Total
Roadway $428, 000 $1,8721000 $2, 300, 000
Project
City Utility $400, 000 $0 $4005000
Right -of -Way $463, 000 $463, 000 $926, 000
Engineering $19,800 $324,041 $343,841
Construction $67,500 $202,500 $270,000
Administration
Total $15378,300 $2,8615541 $4,239,841
= RAMSEY COUNTY
Lindey's Site Plan
Am4wipm PP49
EX. HOME
Pm
. . . . . . . . . .
LJ 1
-------------- -------
A L
AS
-pmp�
I i L#vDEVSPRMfE I
EX. p-S7AJPANT Ih
rim
Y
Lindey's
14
Construction
RAMSEY COUNTY
Special construction considerations:
Stage #
Description of
Work
1 Place temporary
pavement &
drainage
2 Construct north
half of
roundabout
3 Construct south
half of
roundabout
4 Finish
interior/exterior
work
L'
•■•
Temporary Duration
Closure
w/Detour
N/A 4 Weeks
North leg closed. 6 weeks
South leg closed. 6 weeks
N/A 4 weeks
Only 3 changes in traffic control
Minimizes driver confusion and
frustration
Maintains east/west traffic flow
Sufficient room for contractor to work
Open Roundabout before school starts
0 11 a to Orel 910
�� �.
Rd
t: Snenin
T 0
Resources
RAMSEY COUNTY
Many Roundabout educational resources
are available on-line
https://www.co.washington.mn.us/490/Roundabout-U
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/roundabouts/index.html
http://www.mikeontraffic.com/4-way-stop-vs-roundabout/
https:Hsafety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/roundabouts/
https:Htinyurl.com/25ndut3r
MI
RAMSEY COUNTY
We seek your
support!
Planned Schedule:
• Finalize Plans
• Secure
construction
easements and
permits
• Cooperative
Agreement
• Construction
planned for 2023
Planned Schedule
= RAMSEY COUNTY
Attachment B
P-3420 County Road E - Old Snelling Avenue Reconstruction 11-21-22
ROW Expense Estimate - City of Arden Hills
Project
Parcel #
Parcel ID
Site Address
Parcel Size
(SQ FT)
TE AREA
(SQ FT)
PE AREA
(SQ FT)
DE AREA
(SQ FT)
ACCESS
CLOSURE
7
273023330014
3610 SNELLING AVE N
57,935
11,060
1,671
0
YES
8
273023340046
3609 PASCAL AVE N
20,000
1,995
0
0
NO
34
343023220045
3586 RIDGEWOOD RD
29,008
2,006
0
0
NO
38
1 273023330017
1535 OAK AVE
27,000
546
0
0
NO
39
273023330019
1525 LAKE JOHANNA BLVD
21,750
2,471
0
0
NO
40
273023330046
3635 SNELLING AVE N
15,800
187
0
0
NO
42
273023330052
3657 SNELLING AVE N
98,913
4,663
0
1,909
NO
TOTAL
270,406
22,928
1,671
1,909
ONE
ROW EXPENSE ESTIMATE - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Estimated Easement Expense
$
286,278.00
(Based on independent appraisals by Valbridge Property Advisors)
Estimated Relocation Assistance
(Based on possible project impacts provided for under The Uniform Relocation Act of 1970)
$
594,500.00
(Parcel breakdown on Page 2)
Estimated Appraisal Consultant Expense
$
27,500.00
(Based on appraisal consultant contract)
Estimated Acquisition Consultant Expense
$
18,200.00
(Based on acquisition consultant contract)
Total ROW Expense Estimate
$
926,478.00
Ramsey County Share 50%
$
463,239.00
City of Arden Hills Share 50%
$
463,239.00
* This is an estimate for planning purposes / Final ROW cost share will be based on actual expenses
P-3420 County Road E - Old Snelling Avenue Reconstruction 11-21-22
ROW Expense Estimate - City of Arden Hills
Relocation Expense Estimate Detail
Project
Parcel #
Address
Possible Impact
Estimated
Expense
7
3610 SNELLING AVE N
Parking lot revisions due to closing one access on Old Snelling Avenue
(Based on preliminary contractor estimate assuming worst case soil conditions
pending further site investigation)
$ 365,000.00
Tree replacement onsite - Required by City code
$ 50,000.00
Vegetative screening to neighbors - Required by City code
$ 25,000.00
Parking lot lighting on new driveway from County Road E - Required by City code
$ 26,000.00
Contingency on cost increase due to time (2 years) 25%
$ 116,500.00
Parcel Total
$ 582,500.00
8
3609 PASCAL AVE N
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
$ 2,000.00
34
3586 RIDGEWOOD RD
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
$ 2,000.00
38
1535 OAK AVE
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
$ 2,000.00
39
1525 LAKE JOHANNA BLVD
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
$ 2,000.00
40
3635 SNELLING AVE N
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
I $ 2,000.00
42
3657 SNELLING AVE N
Irrigation/Fence/Lightpost/Other site improvements
I $ 2,000.00
Total Estimated Relocation Expense
1 $ 594,500.00
AGENDA ITEM —1B
'r
-731�EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 3, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: TCAAP Process and Term Sheet
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
For Council Consideration
The City Council should consider providing direction on how it wants to approach TCAAP going
forward and discuss the previously approved term sheet.
Background
This item is intended as a preliminary discussion by the City Council for how it wants to approach
TCAAP moving forward. Also, the previously approved term sheet with Alatus is attached for
reference.
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
Attachment A: Approved Term Sheet with Alatus
Page 1 of 1
Attachment A
Term Sheet for RCC
Alatus will construct the RCC Project in compliance with City adopted goals and official controls
and the Alatus development proposal related to building types, location, minimum valuation and
construction timing/phasing, Future revisions to the development plans will be subject to review
and approval upon application by Alatus through the JDA process. Alatus and the City will enter
into a development agreement based on the November 18, 2018 draft Master Development
Agreement consistent with the updated Alatus development proposal and this term sheet.
Alatus will construct all required infrastructure (exclusive of County infrastructure
improvements) included within the site, including a new water tower and related infrastructure,
public works maintenance/storage facility consistent with City design specifications to be
completed no later than the end of Phase I, and the first application of seal coating and striping
for city streets within the Project. These costs are currently estimated to be approximately
$13,225 million in principal amount, with final amounts to be agreed to between the City and
Alatus. Alatus will finance and construct the infrastructure at no direct cost to the City. The City
will credit Alatus these principal financing costs against corresponding customary city imposed
fees (including trunk utility or fee in lieu of park dedication) in sufficient amounts to reimburse
Alatus for the full principal and carrying costs or, if additional amounts are required to reimburse
Alatus, by mutual agreement through fees or special assessments imposed against property or
sub -developers,
Alatus will reimburse the City for planning area expenses in the amount of $1.0 million, $500,000
will be paid within 18 months of the initial plat. A fee will be imposed on sub -developers as upon
execution of a secondary development agreement to reimburse up to a maximum of $1.0 million.
4, Alatus will escrow the estimated City expenditures projected to be incurred over the first five
years of development. Upon issuance by the City of an occupancy permit for a building in the
first phase of Town Center, Alatus may escrow the full amount of the anticipated costs or a lesser
amount agreed to by the City in an evergreen escrow account based upon a schedule of costs in
the Development Agreement, and the City will submit documentation to Alatus for the
expenditures, tax receipts and draws against the security.
5. Alatus will abide by the TRC and City goals for housing, constructing 1,460 dwelling units on the
site, with 880 dwelling units in the downtown area. All the affordable units shall be constructed to
the same standard of quality similar to the market rate dwelling units within the Project and area,
and must be affordable for various family need levels in compliance with City adopted goals. A
total of 326 units of the 1,460 units will be affordable, with 180 (125 LIHTC deeply affordable
units, and 55 units at the 4D tax credit level) located in the Town Center area and the other units
dispersed throughout RCC. A minimum of 2.0% of the affordable units shall be owner -occupied.
The City agrees to participate as the "responsible governmental unit" on all grant applications or
similar affordable housing program applications to meet these targets, and will pass'.1hrough the
corresponding funding to Alatus.
In order to meet the goal of creating a first-class destination and to eliminate virtually all of the
surface parking within the residential and commercial Town Center, a district parking solution for
the 880 downtown dwelling units and commercial properties will be created and financed through
tax increment financing based on Alatus project commitments related to minimum market value
of improvements. Subject to and consistent with statutory requirements and standard practices,
the City will issue one or more pay-as-you-go TIF Notes in the principal amount of $17 million to
provide funding for district parking. The City will also assist in the creation of a special service
2198 W6
district, as requested by Alatus, to provide funding for extraordinary amenities or services related
to the Town Center area that exceed standard City service standards.
At initial plat approval, Alatus will transfer to the City the City Center site previously identified
in the Memorandum of Understanding without any reversionary interest, but with a restrictive
covenant identifying the types of City uses allowed on the site. Should the City have an approved
use on the .site then Alatus, at no -cost to the City, will construct the utility connections for the
City Center Site and any associated underground pedestrian and vehicular access to the adjacent
building. Alatus and the City may pursue a joint development agreement for that site and will
evaluatethe potential for using additional qualified costs, under the Minnesota Tax Increment
Act, within the Project area to provide tax increment financing for those other qualified costs in
an amount equal to the cost of the portion of any structure, for which Alatus would develop at no
additional cost to the City.
8. In lieu of park dedication fees, Alatus will build Project parks and support facilities in accordance
with the executed Memorandum of Understanding dated 12.12.2016. Alatus will form an HOA
and BOA to pay for amenities, operations and maintenance costs for the Project area, including
natural resource areas owned by Alatus. The HOA and BOA will be responsible for any amenity
or service that exceed City standard amenity, service and maintenance practices. Revenues from
a special service district may be utilized, in accordance with state law, for payment of a portion of
these additional costs.
2198180
These terms are agreed to, subject to a definitive Redevelopment Agreement, as of May 9, 2022 by the
City of Arden Hills and Alatus Arden Hills LLC.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
By:
Its: Mayor
By:
Its: City Administrator
219818v6
ALATUS ARDEN HILLS LLC
By:
Its: CEO
AGENDA ITEM — 1C
'r
-731�EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 3, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Remote Meeting Discussion
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
For Council Consideration
The City Council should consider providing direction on remote meeting options going forward.
Background
The City Council will want to discuss if, and how, remote meetings will occur going forward. State
Statue does provide the option for remote meetings via interactive technology, that statute can be
found under Attachment A for reference. It should be noted that if the Council continues to allow
for remote meetings, the option would be extended to all participants assuming the requirements
are met. In short, meetings of public entities must meet these guidelines to meet remotely:
• All members of the body participating in the meeting, wherever their physical location, can
hear and see one another and can hear and see all discussion and testimony presented at any
location at which at least one member is present;
• Members of the public present at the regular meeting location of the body can hear and see
all discussion and testimony and all votes of members of the body;
• At least one member of the body is physically present at the regular meeting location;
• All votes are conducted by roll call so each member's vote on each issue can be identified
and recorded;
• Each location at which a member of the body is present is open and accessible to the public.
The two items that would have to be dealt with should remote meetings be allowed long-term is (1)
having a staff member manage and monitor the Zoom platform, and (2) we may need to purchase
an additional camera to assist in meeting the requirements for work sessions. That said, the staff
manage/monitor aspect is not overly burdensome, and the camera likely wouldn't be too expensive,
but both are in -addition to how we run meetings today.
Page 1 of 2
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
Attachment A: State Statue 13D.02 Other Entity Meetings By Interactive Technology
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
MINNESOTA STATUTES 2022 13D.02
13D.02 OTHER ENTITY MEETINGS BY INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY.
Subdivision 1. Conditions. (a) A meeting governed by section 13D.01, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, and 5, and
this section may be conducted by interactive technology so long as:
(1) all members of the body participating in the meeting, wherever their physical location, can hear and
see one another and can hear and see all discussion and testimony presented at any location at which at least
one member is present;
(2) members of the public present at the regular meeting location of the body can hear and see all
discussion and testimony and all votes of members of the body;
and
(3) at least one member of the body is physically present at the regular meeting location;
(4) all votes are conducted by roll call so each member's vote on each issue can be identified and recorded;
(5) each location at which a member of the body is present is open and accessible to the public.
(b) A meeting satisfies the requirements of paragraph (a), although a member of the public body
participates from a location that is not open or accessible to the public, if the member has not participated
more than three times in a calendar year from a location that is not open or accessible to the public, and:
(1) the member is serving in the military and is at a required drill, deployed, or on active duty; or
(2) the member has been advised by a health care professional against being in a public place for personal
or family medical reasons. This clause only applies when a state of emergency has been declared under
section 12.31, and expires 60 days after the removal of the state of emergency.
Subd. la. Meeting exception. This section applies to meetings of entities described in section 1313.01,
subdivision 1, except meetings of:
(1) a state agency, board, commission, or department, and a statewide public pension plan defined in
section 356A.01, subdivision 24; and
(2) a committee, subcommittee, board, department, or commission of an entity listed in clause (1).
Subd. 2. Members are present for quorum; participation. Each member of a body participating in a
meeting by interactive technology is considered present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum
and participating in all proceedings.
Subd. 3. Monitoring from remote site. If interactive technology is used to conduct a meeting, to the
extent practical, a public body shall allow a person to monitor the meeting electronically from a remote
location.
Subd. 4. Notice of regular and all member locations. If interactive technology is used to conduct a
regular, special, or emergency meeting, the public body shall provide notice of the regular meeting location
and notice of any location where a member of the public body will be participating in the meeting by
interactive technology, except for the locations of members participating pursuant to subdivision 1, paragraph
(b). The timing and method of providing notice must be as described in section 13D.04.
Subd. 5. MS 2020 [Repealed by amendment, 2021 c 14 s 5]
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
13D.02 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2022 2
Subd. 6. Record. The minutes for a meeting conducted under this section must reflect the names of any
members appearing by interactive technology and state the reason or reasons for the appearance by interactive
technology.
History: 1957 c 773 s 1; 1967 c 462 s 1; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1973 c 654 s 15; 1973 c 680 s 1,3; 1975
c271 s6; 1981 c174s1; 1983c137s1; 1983c274s18; 1984c462s27; 1987c313s1; 1990c550s
2, 3; 1991 c 292 art 8 s 12; 1991 c 319 s 22; 1994 c 618 art I s 39; 1997 c 154 s 2; I Sp2011 c 11 art 2 s 1;
2019 c 33 s 1-3; 2020 c 74 art I s 1; 2021 c 14 s 5
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
AGENDA ITEM — 1D
'r
-731�EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 3, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Upcoming Item Review: Pay Equity Report and Plat Filing Extension
Budgeted Amount:
N/A
For Council Consideration
Actual Amount:
N/A
Funding Source:
N/A
The City Council will be given an update on the Pay Equity Report and Plat Filing Extension
which are on the upcoming January 91h agenda.
Background
A verbal update will be provided on the upcoming Pay Equity Report and Extension for the filing
of the DD Skittles First Addition Final Plat with Ramsey County
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
N/A
Page 1 of 1