Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-17-23-WS
AGENDA ITEMS TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons Update Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Primer Tracer Concept Review Discussion Global One Commercial MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Delkor Systems Concept Plan Review Discussion –Sign Standard Adjustment Kevin Weiss, Delkor Systems MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Survey Results HR Green MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Home Occupation Ordinance Amendment Discussion Kerri Seemann MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Assisted Hearing Equipment And Council Chambers Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Pavement Condition Update And 2023 Street And Trail Maintenance Plan David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF Parkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop –Official Name Discussion David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Council Liaison Appointments Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Public Inquiries Language Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Retreat Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Tracker Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Emily Rousseau Tena Monson Tom Fabel City Council Work Session Agenda January 17, 2023 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via Zoom T o join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89059888938 CALL TO ORDER 1. 1.A. Documents: 1.B. Documents: 1.C. Documents: 1.D. Documents: 1.E. Documents: 1.F. Documents: 1.G. Documents: 1.H. Documents: 1.I. Documents: 1.J. Documents: 1.K. Documents: 1.L. Documents: 2. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AGENDA ITEMSTCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFPrimer Tracer Concept Review DiscussionGlobal One CommercialMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Delkor Systems Concept Plan Review Discussion –Sign Standard Adjustment Kevin Weiss, Delkor Systems MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Survey Results HR Green MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Home Occupation Ordinance Amendment Discussion Kerri Seemann MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF Assisted Hearing Equipment And Council Chambers Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Pavement Condition Update And 2023 Street And Trail Maintenance Plan David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF Parkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop –Official Name Discussion David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Council Liaison Appointments Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Public Inquiries Language Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Retreat Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Tracker Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonTom Fabel City Council Work Session Agenda January 17, 2023 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89059888938CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents: 1.C. Documents: 1.D. Documents: 1.E. Documents: 1.F. Documents: 1.G. Documents: 1.H. Documents: 1.I. Documents: 1.J. Documents: 1.K. Documents: 1.L. Documents: 2. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AGENDA ITEMSTCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFPrimer Tracer Concept Review DiscussionGlobal One CommercialMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFDelkor Systems Concept Plan Review Discussion –Sign Standard AdjustmentKevin Weiss, Delkor SystemsMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFArden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Survey ResultsHR GreenMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFHome Occupation Ordinance Amendment DiscussionKerri SeemannMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFAssisted Hearing Equipment And Council ChambersDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPavement Condition Update And 2023 Street And Trail Maintenance PlanDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF Parkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop –Official Name Discussion David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Council Liaison Appointments Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Public Inquiries Language Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Retreat Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF Council Tracker Dave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonTom Fabel City Council Work Session Agenda January 17, 2023 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89059888938CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents:1.C.Documents:1.D.Documents:1.E.Documents:1.F.Documents:1.G. Documents: 1.H. Documents: 1.I. Documents: 1.J. Documents: 1.K. Documents: 1.L. Documents: 2. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website AGENDA ITEMSTCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFPrimer Tracer Concept Review DiscussionGlobal One CommercialMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFDelkor Systems Concept Plan Review Discussion –Sign Standard AdjustmentKevin Weiss, Delkor SystemsMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFArden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Survey ResultsHR GreenMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFHome Occupation Ordinance Amendment DiscussionKerri SeemannMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFAssisted Hearing Equipment And Council ChambersDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFPavement Condition Update And 2023 Street And Trail Maintenance PlanDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFParkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop –Official Name DiscussionDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFCouncil Liaison AppointmentsDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFPublic Inquiries LanguageDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFCouncil RetreatDave Perrault, City AdministratorMEMO.PDFCouncil TrackerDave Perrault, City Administrator MEMO.PDF COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonTom Fabel City Council Work Session Agenda January 17, 2023 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.This meeting can be accessed remotely by joining via ZoomTo join the Zoom Meeting via your computer, click this link (or copy and paste it into a new browser): https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89059888938CALL TO ORDER1.1.A.Documents:1.B.Documents:1.C.Documents:1.D.Documents:1.E.Documents:1.F.Documents:1.G.Documents:1.H.Documents:1.I.Documents:1.J.Documents:1.K.Documents:1.L.Documents: 2. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM – 1A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A For Council Consideration A verbal update regarding the TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons project will be provided to the City Council. Background N/A Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 4 AGENDA ITEM – 1B MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning Case 23-002 – Concept Plan Review Global One Commercial - Primer Tracer Property Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should consider a request for a Concept Plan Review, submitted by Global One Commercial (“Applicant”) for property owned by the Federal Government commonly referred to as the “Primer Tracer” property (“Subject Property”). The Applicant is seeking feedback from the City Council on the concept plan for a potential industrial use in advance of the upcoming auction for 62 +/- acres that the Federal Government intends to sell. The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and ask questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and Applicant (Section 1320.14, Subd 4 of the Zoning Code). No formal action can be taken at a Work Session. A formal application will be subject to the full review process, including a public hearing with Planning Commission and City Council review. Background The Subject Property is part of approximately 1,611 acres owned by the Federal Government and used primarily by the Minnesota National Guard as the Arden Hills Army Training Site (AHATS). The Subject Property is approximately 233 acres of which 62 +/- acres is the highlighted “listing area” to be considered for purposes of the concept review discussion. Page 2 of 4 Aerial Map of Subject Property General Services Administration (GSA) is a Federal Agency that manages real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across the government. GSA Auctions facilitates the disposal of property owned by the Federal Government. Last summer, GSA Auctions made the City aware that the Federal Government was considering the sale of approximately 62 acres of an area that is commonly referred to as the “Primer Tracer” property. This portion of the property was previously used as a manufacturing facility for the production of component primers and tracing compounds associated with small caliber ammunition production. GSA Parcel Listing 62 +/- acres - Listing Area Page 3 of 4 The Federal Government intends to sell the property “as is”. The Buyer purchasing the property would be responsible for handling all of the processes associated with the future development of the site (i.e. land use approval, demolition, permitting, etc.). In completing their due diligence prior to the auction, the Applicant has submitted for a high-level concept review in order to present an overview of future development scenarios before making the final decision to bid on this site. For the concept review, the Applicant wishes to engage in a discussion with the Council in order to gauge the City’s perspective of potential future vision(s) for this site. Discussion Existing Conditions The following is the listing description from GSA Auctions: • The 62-acre sale parcel is bounded by the Arden Hills Army Training Site on the north, east and south and the Rice Creek Corridor on the west. The Property contains buildings, roads and specialized infrastructure that supported ammunition manufacturing and testing. Structures include a primer manufacturing facility and earthen berm storage magazines. The improvements, constructed in the 1940s and 1950s, are in various stages of disrepair. The Property has no public street frontage. County Road I is about one quarter mile north. Access to the Property from County Road I will be in the form of an easement. City staff is not aware of the analysis, if any, completed for the potential subdivision of land with regard to road access and/or utilities. The GSA listing does include information that environmental remediation has been completed on the approximate 62 acres to an industrial level. Staff’s understanding is that the deed for the sale of the property will include the land use restriction specifying no residential use. Additionally, for background on this site, Ramsey County in partnership with Xcel Energy in December of 2015 had considered purchasing the Primer Tracer area from the Federal Government. The preliminary concept was for 20+ acres to be developed for an Emergency Management Center and 40+ acres would be a solar array supporting energy initiatives of the Rice Creek Commons site. Due to logistical and economic factors, Xcel Energy informed all parties that they would no longer be considering the Primer Tracer site as a future solar project location. Beyond that, the City has not studied or completed an analysis of potential future uses for this site. In addition, there is no guiding development plan for these 62 +/- acres within the TCAAP area. The Subject Property is zoned Conservation District (CD). The purpose of the CD District is “To provide a "holding" zone for federally owned lands on the Arden Hills Army Training Site to ensure that future development is staged, maintains a sustainable level of public expenditures for utilities and services, and protects those areas generally determined to be unsuitable for development due to the presence of wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, certain drainage and soil conditions, and critical wildlife habitat.” The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan has this parcel as well as the areas immediately adjacent to the north, east, and south guided towards PP, Park Preserve. The properties to the west are owned by Ramsey County and are guided towards POS, Park and Open Space as part of the Rice Creek North Regional Trail. Page 4 of 4 Concept Plan Proposal The Applicant has prepared two concept layouts both guided towards industrial uses. In both scenarios, the Applicant has identified an intent to seek rezoning of the 62-acres to I-2, General Industrial Zoning District. City Code defines Industry as “Uses such as the manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging, treatment, assembling or warehousing of products and materials.” At this concept review stage, staff does not have the details necessary to complete a preliminary analysis of development scenarios as it pertains to compliance with I-2 District requirements or design standards. Based on an initial review, staff believes a future proposal would require the following land use requests: • Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Subdivision • Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change designation of development site from Park Preserve to Light Industrial & Office • Rezoning of the development site from CD, Conservation District to I-2, General Industrial District • Planned Unit Development • Conditional Use Permit for tenant uses and exterior storage Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Location Map B. Applicant Narrative C. Concept Site Plans D. Listing Photographs E. WS Presentation Location Map Tax Parcels _Query result Personal Property Cities County Offices 1/9/2023, 9:33:56 AM 0 0.55 1.10.28 mi 0 0.85 1.70.42 km 1:32,000 Ramsey County Ramsey County MN Approx. 62 +/- acres NARRATIVE ARDEN HILLS BUSINESS COMMONS January 4, 2023 OPTION A: Global One Commercial and their architectural team at Tushie Montgomery Architects has put together two (2) different concept plans for the roughly 62 acre Hillview site at the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (“TCAAP”) located in Arden Hills, MN. We have named this industrial development Arden Hills Business Commons. Option A at Arden Hills BC incorporates five (5) different multi-tenant buildings with a combined square footage of 985,000 Square Feet (“SF”). The first building is a self-storage facility on three levels of 72,000 SF. This would be a temperature controlled self-storage building with some additional office square footage and building conference room. The office square footage will be leased out to office space users like sales representatives and companies that need some additional office space to manage their self-storage needs. The self-storage also incorporates a special secured outdoor storage area where residents in the community can park their recreational vehicles (“RVs”), boats and personal watercraft. Many communities across the metropolitan area are trying to take advantage of this kind of secured outdoor storage as to get RVs and boats off residential streets. The second building (Building A) is a 208,000 SF multi-tenant manufacturing and technology building with 35 foot internal clear height with a total building height less than 45’ maximum. The building will be designed with both truck loading docks and drive-ins. Building A will also have ample surface parking of 168 stalls not including the truck loading areas. The third building (Building B) is a 208,000 SF multi-tenant manufacturing and technology building with 35 foot internal clear height for increased height for racking. The total height of the building will be less than 45’ maximum. The building will be designed with both truck loading docks and drive-ins. Building B will have ample parking of 154 stalls and it will also share parking with Building C. The fourth building (Building C) is a 156,000 SF single user corporate headquarters building. The building will have 35 foot internal clear height for increased product shelving needs. This building will also feature mezzanine level space for the corporate user who needs additional office square footage. The total height of the building will be less than 45’ maximum. Building C will have ample parking of 154 stalls in addition to sharing Building B’s parking. The fifth building (Building D) is a 341,000 SF single-tenant medium sized distribution center. The building will feature 35 foot internal clear height for increased product shelving needs. The total height of the building will be less than 45’ maximum. The building will be designed with truck loading docks to speed up the distribution function of the building. Building D will have ample parking with 422 parking stalls. Please note the proposed site plan incorporates a dedicated entry point into Arden Hills Business Commons. Storm water ponds will be designed to encourage wildlife habitats to form and enhance the overall character of the various green spaces throughout the entire development. The site plan also includes walking trails for corporate users connecting all buildings at Arden Hills Business Commons. NARRATIVE ARDEN HILLS BUSINESS COMMONS January 4, 2023 OPTION B: Global One Commercial and their architectural team at Tushie Montgomery Architects has put together two (2) different concept plans for the roughly 62 acre Hillview site at the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (“TCAAP”) located in Arden Hills, MN. We have named this industrial development Arden Hills Business Commons. Option B at Arden Hills BC incorporates two (2) different multi-tenant buildings with a combined square footage of 1,028,000 Square Feet (“SF”). The first building (Building A) is a large fulfillment center of 656,000 SF designed for a single user distribution company. The building will have 35 foot internal clear height for increased product shelving needs. The total height of the building will be less than 45’ maximum. There will be second floor mezzanine space available for the tech company’s back office workforce. The building will be designed with truck loading docks to speed up the distribution function of the building. Building A will have ample parking of 488 stalls. The second building (Building B) is a 372,000 SF large sized distribution center. This building will feature 35 foot internal clear height for increased product shelving needs. The total height of the building will be less than 45’ maximum. Second floor mezzanine space could also be built into this building depending on required office space needs. The building will be designed with truck loading docks to speed up the distribution function of the building. Building B will have ample parking with 368 parking stalls. Please note the proposed site plan incorporates a dedicated entry point into Arden Hills Business Commons. Option B also incorporates three (3) different areas for truck parking as this option is designed to be a fulfillment center and distribution center for two (2) different corporate users. Storm water ponds will be designed to encourage wildlife habitats to form and enhance the overall character of the various green spaces throughout the entire development. The site plan also includes walking trails for corporate users connecting all buildings at Arden Hills Business Commons. BLDG A 260' x 800' 208,000 SF BLDG B 260' x 800' 208,000 SF BLDG C 260' x 600' 156,000 SF BLDG D 1,100' x 310' 341,000 SF LOADINGLOADING STORM WATER POND SELF STORAGE 3 LEVELS 120' x 200' 72,000 SF STORM WATER POND B ST A ST D STMOUNDSVIEW BLVDN MAGAZINE RDSTORM WATER POND SECURED OUTDOOR STORAGE LOADINGLOADINGENTRY INTO DEVELOPMENT COUNTY ROAD I WEST MOUNDSVIEW BLVD© 2022 TUSHIE-MONTGOMERY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS ARDEN HILLS BUSINESS COMMONS (HILLVIEW SITE AT TCAAP) COUNTY ROAD I W ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 12.29.2022 OPTION A 222150A SCALE:1" = 240'-0" 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE:1" = 1000'-0" 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN TOTAL SF: 985,000 SF SELF STORAGE (3 LEVELS): 72,000 SF BUILDING A: 208,000 SF BUILDING B: 208,000 SF BUILDING C: 156,000 SF BUILDING D: 341,000 SF TOTAL PARKING ESTIMATE: 898 SURFACE BLDG A: 168 SURFACE BLDG B - C: 308 SURFACE BLDG D: 422 SITE INFORMATION: ±62 ACRES SITE AREA (APPROX): (±2,700,720 SF) ZONING SUMMARY: EXISTING ZONING CD- CONSERVATION DISTRICT: DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED I-2 DISTRICT: LOT COVERAGE:± 937,000 SF I-2 40% MAXIMUM 34.7% PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA:± 709,998 SF I-2 25% MINIMUM 26.3% PROVIDED FAR: I-2 0.8 MAXIMUM 0.37 PROVIDED SETBACKS: I-2 50' MINIMUM STRUCTURE HEIGHT: I-2 45' MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY BLDG A 1,600' x 410' 656,000 SF STORM WATER POND BLDG B 1,200' x 310' 372,000 SF LOADING STORM WATER POND TRAILER PARKING LOADING B ST A ST D STMOUNDSVIEW BLVDN MAGAZINE RDSTORM WATER POND STORM WATER POND TRAILER PARKING TRAILER PARKING ENTRY INTO DEVELOPMENT COUNTY ROAD I WEST MOUNDSVIEW BLVD© 2022 TUSHIE-MONTGOMERY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS ARDEN HILLS BUSINESS COMMONS (HILLVIEW SITE AT TCAAP) COUNTY ROAD I W ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 12.29.2022 OPTION B 222150A SCALE:1" = 240'-0" 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN TOTAL SF: 1,028,000 SF BUILDING A: 656,000 SF BUILDING B: 372,000 SF TOTAL PARKING ESTIMATE: 856 SURFACE BLDG A : 488 SURFACE BLDG B : 368 SITE INFORMATION: ±62 ACRES SITE AREA (APPROX): (±2,700,720 SF) SCALE:1" = 1000'-0" 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN ZONING SUMMARY: EXISTING ZONING CD- CONSERVATION DISTRICT: DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED I-2 DISTRICT: LOT COVERAGE:± 1,028,000 SF I-2 40% MAXIMUM 38.1% PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA:± 714,009 SF I-2 25% MINIMUM 26.4% PROVIDED FAR: I-2 0.8 MAXIMUM 0.38 PROVIDED SETBACKS: I-2 50' MINIMUM STRUCTURE HEIGHT: I-2 45' MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY North North North North North County Ro a d I Pictures from GSA Auction Listing Planning Case #23-002 Applicant: Global One Commercial Property Location: Primer Tracer Site Request: Concept Plan Review for Future Development Zoning: CD, Conservation District Land Use: PP, Park Preserve 1 Round Lake No Approvals The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and ask questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and Applicant. No formal action can be taken at a Work Session. 2 Proposal –Concept Plan Review •Company:Global One Commercial •Future Development Proposal •Option A –5 different multi-tenant buildings •Option B –2 different multi-tenant buildings 3 Site Background •Property is part of approx. 1,611 acres owned by the Federal Government •Used by Minnesota National Guard as the Arden Hills Army Training Site (AHATS) •Subject Property is approx. 233 acres of which 62 +/-acres is the highlighted “listing area” •This portion of the property was previously used as a manufacturing facility for the production of component primers and tracing compounds associated with small caliber ammunition production •To be sold by GSA Auctions “as is” –approx. 50 structures on Subject Property 4 Site Listing from GSA Auctions Preliminary Analysis –Future Land Use Applications •Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Subdivision •Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change designation of development site from Park Preserve to Light Industrial & Office •Rezoning of the development site from CD, Conservation District to I-2, General Industrial District •Planned Unit Development •Conditional Use Permit for tenant uses and exterior storage 5 Photos from GSA Auctions Photos from GSA Auctions Option -A Option -B Planning Case 23-002 – Concept Plan Review, Global One Commercial Questions? Page 1 of 6 AGENDA ITEM – 1C MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning Case 23-001 – Concept Plan Review Sign Standard Adjustment: 4300 Round Lake Road W and 1987 Gateway Boulevard Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should consider a request for a Concept Plan Review, submitted by Delkor Systems, Inc. (“Applicant”). The request is for flexibility on the maximum size of the copy area of wall signage allowed at two Delkor locations at 4300 Round Lake Road W and 1987 Gateway Boulevard (“Subject Properties”). The Applicant is seeking feedback from the City Council on the concept plan in advance of the full submission; a Site Plan Review is required for sign standard adjustments. The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and Applicant (Section 1320.14, Subd 4 of the Zoning Code). No formal action can be taken at a Work Session. A formal application will be subject to the full review process, including a public hearing with Planning Commission and City Council review. Background The Applicant is proposing wall signage with a 60-square-foot copy area on the western elevations of two Delkor locations at 4300 Round Lake Road W and 1987 Gateway Boulevard (“Subject Properties”). The Subject Properties are located in Sign District 7, which allows for wall signage with a copy area of up to 45 square feet. The proposed wall signs would be internally lit with LED-illuminated letter sets, as permitted in Sign District 7. The Applicant has noted that the proposed signage has been pre-approved by the building owner as long as it conforms to city codes. Page 2 of 6 The Applicant was recently approved for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at a third location they occupy at 4200 Round Lake Road. At their August 22, 2022 meeting, the City Council approved a request for wall signage with a 60-square-foot copy area on three elevations at the new Gateway building subject to sign standards under Sign District 6. The Applicant has indicated the proposed signage would be consistent and conform to the approvals at 4200 Round Lake Road. Based on an initial review of the Applicant’s sign plan, the City Council may consider one or more of the following processes during the concept review discussion: • Allow flexibility to sign standards under City Code Section 1260.01 through Site Plan Review. • Amend the sign code to reclassify the Gateway Business Zoning District from Sign District 7 to Sign District 6. • Amend the sign code to increase the total sign copy area allowed for wall signs in Sign District 7 from 45 square feet to up to 60 square feet. Given the Applicant occupies three locations along Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard, they have decided to start with the concept review in advance of the full submission in order to seek direction from the City Council on handling of flexibility. Discussion Existing Conditions The Applicant leases the majority of both Subject Properties shown below. In the respective lease agreements for both buildings, the Applicant has the right to place signage on the western elevation. The Subject Properties are located in the Gateway Business Zoning District, which is part of Sign District 7. The Subject Properties are guided as Light Industrial and Office in the 2040 Land Use Plan. All surrounding properties are also located in the Gateway Business Zoning District, Sign District 7, and the Light Industrial and Office land use designation. Aerial Map of Subject Properties Concept Plan Proposal The Applicant is proposing to construct wall signage with a 60-square-foot sign copy area on the western elevation of both Subject Properties. To construct this size of signage, the Applicant is looking for flexibility from the City Code, Chapter 12 – Sign Code through the Site Plan Review Page 3 of 6 process. Sign District 7, applicable to Subject Properties, allows for wall signage with a maximum sign copy area of 45 square feet. Currently, a 45-square-foot “Delkor” sign is installed on the western elevation of the 4300 Round Lake Road building. No signs are currently installed on the western elevation of the 1987 Gateway Boulevard building. Sign Standard Adjustments, Section 1260.01 Under City Code Section 1260.01, Sign Standard Adjustments it states “adjustments to the requirements and standards for the height, number, type, lighting, area, and/or location of a sign or signs established by this Chapter may be approved with a Site Plan Review or a Planned Unit Development process.” Based on the criteria outlined in Section 1260.01, the City Council shall consider the following provisions while reviewing the Concept Plan proposal: 1. Subd. 1 There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site. According to the Applicant, a sign adjustment is requested to identify and orientate customers to Delkor’s buildings from nearby roadways. The current 45 sq-ft sign is quite small in relative size when compared to the size of the building and other district standards with interstate exposure. 2. Subd. 2 The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site. According to the Applicant, the design of the new, all white sign is simple and elegant complimenting the colors and features of the buildings. As noted above and in the sign Page 4 of 6 plan, the additional signs will be identical to those already installed on the new 4200 Round Lake Road building. 3. Subd. 3 The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. According to the Applicant, the additional sign will enhance the purpose of the current land use by navigating visitors to the proper company locations. In addition, as set forth in section 11.GB of the ‘City of Arden Hills – 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Gateway Business District (AHC)’ the tenants believe that the proposed signage is consistent with the purposes of: • “D. To allow only development that will create an attractive environment and a positive image for this site, which is one of the most visible in the community…” and • “G. To allow development that will insure reasonable traffic operation on the internal and surrounding transportation systems.” Planning staff would add that the new construction of the Gateway Interstate building at 4200 Round Lake Road was approved on October 12, 2020 as part of a Planned Unit Development that included sign district flexibility. The sign flexibility that the Applicant is seeking under this proposal for the Subject Properties would be initiated through the Site Plan Review process. The review process type is different because the Subject Properties are existing buildings that are operating in accordance with city code requirements under the Gateway Business Zoning District as allowed without a Planned Unit Development. A Planned Unit Development is an overlay district utilized on land use reviews for residential and commercial subdivisions, new developments, or redevelopments that will function as one entity or may include flexibility to design standards. Not all properties in the City function as part of a Planned Unit Development. Rather there are historical uses (i.e. permitted use, conditional use, special use, legal nonconforming, etc.) that are allowed to continue until such time that there is a change in use or modification to the site or building that triggers an additional zoning/land use review. Sign Code 1240.02 – Sign Standards by Sign District When staff was initially contacted for review of the proposed signage, the Applicant was unaware of the two different Sign District classifications between their three locations. Although there is a mechanism under the sign code that allows for sign standard adjustments, staff advised the Applicant that the City Council might also consider the following alternate options: 1) Amend the sign code to reclassify the Gateway Business Zoning District from Sign District 7 to Sign District 6., or 2) Amend the sign code to increase the total sign copy area allowed for wall signs in Sign District 7 from 45 square feet to up to 60 square feet. The Applicant wanted to discuss all three processes with the Council and has applied for the concept review to garner feedback in advance of their future land use application. All properties located within the Gateway Business District fall under Sign District 7. Sign District 7 includes all properties in the I-Flex, Gateway Business, or other commercial or industrial district without frontage on a designated roadway (i.e. County Road E or Lexington Avenue). In comparison, Sign District 6 would be those properties zoned for commercial or Page 5 of 6 industrial use fronting on Lexington Avenue north of Interstate 694, properties along Highway 96, and properties located in the B-1 zoning district. Chapter 12 – Sign Code As additional background, the Gateway Business Zoning District was adopted in 1990. Properties that fall under this zoning district were rezoned from either I-1, Limited Industrial or R-2, Single and Two Family to Gateway Business. The GB Zoning District encompasses approximately 18 parcels south of Hwy 96 and west of Round Lake along Interstate 694 and Interstate 35W. Of those parcels, 10 are currently developed with commercial uses. Staff verified that two properties have recevied flexibility for signage as part of a PUD and two have legal nonconforming wall signage. Ramsey County GIS Map – Parcels under GB Zoning District Page 6 of 6 Sign District 7 Existing Wall Signage Status 1920 Highway 96 W. 45 square feet Up to 60 square feet PUD 4480 Round Lake Road 45 square feet 64 square feet Legal Nonconforming 4444 Round Lake Road 45 square feet 79 square feet Legal Nonconforming 4200 Round Lake Road 45 square feet Up to 60 square feet PUD The purpose of the Gateway Business District is: A. To implement that part of Arden Hills Comprehensive Development Plan known as the I- 694/I-35W Plan. B. To promote high quality, unified, large-scale development in a manner similar to a planned unit development. C. To take full advantage of the site's location as documented and described in the NE I- 694/I-35W Plan. D. To allow only development that will create an attractive environment and a positive image for this site, which is one of the most visible in the community and represents the City's last major development site. E. To protect the site's environmental resources. F. To promote flexibility in land uses and development standards to achieve the objectives of the I-694/I-35W Plan. G. To allow development that will insure reasonable traffic operation on the internal and surrounding transportation systems. Under Zoning Code Section 1320.13, Special Requirements for the GB District in Subd. 6.G – Signs, the ordinance further states that “Deviation from the standard regulations shall be allowed only after the applicant demonstrates, and the City concurs, that the deviation is essential to further the purpose of the GB District.” Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Location Map B. Land Use Application C. Applicant Narrative D. Delkor Systems Sign Plan E. City Code Section 1240.02 – Sign District Table F. WS Presentation Location Map Tax Parcels _Query result Personal Property Tax Parcels Cities County Offices 1/9/2023, 9:45:28 AM 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi 0 0.2 0.40.1 km 1:8,000 Ramsey County Ramsey County MN Page 1 of 3 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.cityofardenhills.org For Office Use Only Planning Case No. 22- Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2022 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant: Address: Telephone No.: Other: Fax No.: Email Address: Property Information Property Owner: Owner Address: Owner Telephone No. Other: Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: Property ID No.: Type of Use: Zone: Property Acreage: Type of Request Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Fee: $550 + Escrow: $2,500) Conditional Use or Interim Use Permit/CUP or IUP Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Preliminary Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Plat (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,000) Concept Plan Review (Fee: $300 + Escrow: $750) Master Planned Unit Development or Master Special Development Plan (Fee: $600 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Planned Unit Development or Final Special Development Plan (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $2,000) Planned Unit Development Amendment or Special Development Plan Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Site Plan Review (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,500) Rezoning or TCAAP Regulating Plan Amendment (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500) Zoning Code or TCAAP Redevelopment Code Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) City Code Amendment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Lot Split/Minor Subdivision (R-1 and R-2 Districts Only) (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Variance or Permitted Adjustment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,000) Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Appeal of Administrative Decision (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000 Delkor Systems, Inc 4300 Round Lake Road West 612-670-1311 651-348-6705 kweiss@delkorsystems.com 763-225-5901 651-336-3619 Bre Space Arden Hills LLC (LINK LOGISTICS) PO Box A3879 Chicago IL 60690-3879 4300 Round Lake Rd. W. & 1987 Gateway Blvd. GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION LOT 1 BLK 1 & LOT 2 BLK 1 For both: 479 FLEX INDUSTRIAL CENTER 651-348-6719 Page 2 of 3 Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaining the project): Filing & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional application requirements can be found at www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications. Complete/Incomplete Applications Under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 15.99, cities have 15 business days to review all plans and application materials to ensure they satisfy City requirements. During the 15 day review period, planning staff will provide written comments on the application and may request plan revisions. If the application is determined to be complete, Minnesota State Statute then requires the City to approve or deny the application within 60 days, up to 120 days. If not complete, the City may require plan revisions and/or additional information before the application is scheduled for Planning Commission review and/or C ity Council action. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. Payment of Fees and Escrows The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Each separate land use request shall be charged a separate administrative fee and escrow even if submitted on the same application. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include planning and engineering staff time, City Attorney and consulting fees, and mailing costs. If, at any time, a required cash escrow is depleted to less than 20 percent of its original amount, the applicant shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all fees have been paid. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. The escrow may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis. Notice of Meeting Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. *IMPORTANT* Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Waters hed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398-3070 for additional information. The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. All applications will be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of consultant costs associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of application in the form of an escrow to the City. Request is for 60 sq-ft signage on western elevation of two (2) Delkor buildings. Current building at 4200 Round Lake Rd. W. (also occupied by Delkor) was approved for 60 sq-ft. The same consideration is requested for the identified buildings. Note that signage has been pre-approved by building owner as long as it conforms with governmental codes. sign standards specify 45 sq-ft for District 7 & 60 sq-ft for District 6. The new Gateway Page 3 of 3 Meeting Schedule Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday of each month at 6:30 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. The schedules below are for reference purposes only. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the City Planner. 2022 Planning Commission and City Council Schedule (*subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday at 6:30 p.m.) TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the fourth Monday at 7:00 p.m.) DEADLINE FOR LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMISSION (1st day of the preceding month) January 5 January 24 December 1 (2021) February 9 February 28 January 3 March 9 March 28 February 1 April 6 April 25 March 1 May 4 May 23 April 1 June 8 June 27 May 2 July 6 July 25 June 1 August 3 August 22 July 1 September 7 September 26 August 1 October 5 October 24 September 1 November 9 November 28 October 3 December 7 January 9 (2023) November 1 January 4 (2023) January 23 (2023) December 1 Acknowledgement and Signature I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate per city code and ordinance requirements . I fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. __________________________________________________ ________________ Property Owner Signature (Required) Date ________________________________________________ ________________ Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date Please contact the City Planner at 651-792-7800 if you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City’s website: www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications 12/16/2022 2022 LAND USE APPLICATION: Concept Plan Review Delkor Systems, Inc. 12/16/2022 From Application Form. Request is for 60 sq-ft signage on western elevation of two (2) Delkor buildings. Current sign standards specify 45 sq-ft total for District 7 & 60 sq-ft for District 6. The new Gateway building at 4200 Round Lake Rd. W. (also occupied by Delkor) was approved for 60 sq-ft. The same consideration is requested for the identified buildings. Note that signage has been pre-approved by building owner as long as it conforms with governmental codes. Current State. Referencing the image below—As of August 2022, Delkor leases the majority of both buildings (i) 4300 Round Lake Road and (ii) 1987 Gateway Boulevard. Delkor secured the western elevation signage rights for both buildings in each respective lease agreement. A 45 sq- ft “Delkor” sign was installed in 2020 in the location “1A” (below) on the 4300 Round Lake Road building. The design of the sign is the Delkor logo in opposing red and black colors. No signs are currently installed on the western elevation of the 1987 Gateway building. “1B” in the location below would be the proposed location for an additional sign. 2022 LAND USE APPLICATION: Concept Plan Review Delkor Systems, Inc. Delkor also leases space in the recently constructed 4200 Round Lake Road build ing. Working with the city of Arden Hills and Scannell for approvals, Delkor installed two (2) 60 sq-ft signs on the south and south-western elevations of the building in 2022. A picture of the South elevation sign is shown (at right). The signs are all white and backlight illuminated with soft LED diffusion. New Signs. In light of the recent approvals for 60 sq-ft signs on the 4200 Round Lake Road building, Delkor proposes to convert and add signage on (a) 4300 Round Lake Road and (b) 1987 Gateway Boulevard to the same. More specifically, pending Arden Hills approval Delkor proposes to: (a) Replace the existing sign on 4300 Round Lake Road with a larger, all white version—mirroring the 60 sq-ft sign on the new building at 4200 Round Lake Road. (b) Install the same sign on 1987 Gateway Blvd. For more detail, attached is a plan from Spectrum Signs, proposal #220529 Delkor Systems Sign Plan - Arden Hills (enclosed). 2022 LAND USE APPLICATION: Concept Plan Review Delkor Systems, Inc. Section 1260.01. The sign ordinance requires that, “In order to approve any sign standard adjustment, the following criteria of Subd. 1 or Subd. 2 shall be satisfied, and the necessary criteria of Subd. 3 shall be satisfied: • Subd. 1 There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; • Subd. 2 The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; • Subd. 3 The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use.” Addressing Subd. 1 and 2, and similar to the conditions applying to the 4200 Round Lake Rd. building, a sign adjustment is requested to identify and orientate customers to Delkor’s buildings from nearby roadways. The current 45 sq-ft sign is quite small in relative size when compared to the size of the building and other district standards with interstate exposure. In addition, the design of the new, all white sign is simple and elegant complimenting the colors and features of the buildings. As noted above and in the sign plan, the additional signs will be identical to those already installed on the new 4200 Round Lake Road building. For additional design details, please reference the proposal #220529 Delkor Systems Sign Plan - Arden Hills (enclosed). Addressing Subd. 3, Delkor believes that the additional sign will enhance the purpose of the current land use by navigating visitors to the proper company location s. In addition, as set forth in section 11.GB of the ‘City of Arden Hills – 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Gateway Business District (AHC)’ the tenants believe that the proposed signage is consistent with the purposes of: • “D. To allow only development that will create an attractive environment and a positive image for this site, which is one of the most visible in the community…” and • “G. To allow development that will insure reasonable traffic operation on the internal and surrounding transportation systems” 2022 LAND USE APPLICATION: Concept Plan Review Delkor Systems, Inc. Signage Plan & Consideration. Delkor is seeking flexibility or code revisions as set forth above and in the attached proposal #220529 Delkor Systems Sign Plan created by Spectrum Sign Systems. Requestor appreciates the flexibility and consideration offered by the Planning Commission and City Council of Arden Hills and wishes to present this topic when convenient for the parties, sincerely, Kevin B. Weiss Vice President of Operations Delkor Systems, Inc. 8786 W. 35W Service Drive Blaine, MN 55449 763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.com 220529 Delkor Systems Sign Plan - Arden Hills Contact Delkor Systems Attn: Kevin Weiss 4300 Round Lake Road W St. Paul, MN 55112 Jobsite 4300 Round Lake Road West 2051 Gateway Blvd Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phone/Email 612-670-1311 kweiss@delkorsystems.com Salesperson Rick Ferraro Project Manager Design Alex Wasnick Date 6-28-22 220529 - Delkor Systems - Sign Plan - Arden Hills 8786 W. 35W Service Drive Blaine, MN 55449 763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.com Customer Approval Date This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing for the purpose of constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems Inc., will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Night View Furnish and Install (2) 59” x 145.75“ LED Face Illuminated Remote Mount Leer Sets A. 5” Deep Remote Mount Channel Leers - 1” Black Trim Cap - 5” Black Aluminum Returns - 3/16” White Acrylic Faces - White LED Illumination B. Aached to Wall with Threaded Rod and Silicon Adhesive C. Power Supplies in Building for Service - 20’-0” Leads for Electrical D. Existing Wall Background * Leer Stroke Width Adjusted for LED Illumination 59.8 Square Feet A B C D 59 in 145.75 in 27.25 in 220529 - Delkor Systems - Sign Plan - Arden Hills 8786 W. 35W Service Drive Blaine, MN 55449 763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.com Customer Approval Date This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing for the purpose of constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems Inc., will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Proposed Sign - West Elevation - 4300 220529 - Delkor Systems - Sign Plan - Arden Hills 8786 W. 35W Service Drive Blaine, MN 55449 763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.com Customer Approval Date This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing for the purpose of constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems Inc., will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Proposed Sign - West Elevation - 2051 N 1A 1B 1A - LED Illuminated Letter Set @ 59.8 Square Feet West Elevation 1B - LED Illuminated Letter Set @ 59.8 Square Feet West Elevation 210899 - Gateway Interstate - Sign Plan 8786 W. 35W Service Drive Blaine, MN 55449 763-432-7447 | www.spectrum-signs.com Customer Approval Date This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing for the purpose of constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems Inc., will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. City of Arden Hills Chapter 12 - Sign Code 12-13 Adopted: March 10, 2008 Sign Type District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 Residential R1/R2 Non- Residential Uses R1-R4 Residential R3/R4 County E Frontage Revised December 3, 2008 Lexington S of 694 Lexington N of 694, 96 & B1 I FLEX & Gateway, Non-Frontage Commercial Neighborhood Business TCAAP without frontage on Highway 96 Total sign copy area 8 sf 20 sf 20 sf 50 sf 80 sf 60 sf 45 sf 30 sf 30 sf Max Height none none none none none none none 14 ft 14 ft Lighting (a)Not permitted external Not permitted E/I/B E/I/B E/I E/I Not permitted Not permitted Type (b)M/P/O M/P/O M/P/O M/O M/O M/P/O M/P/O M/P/O Not permitted Total sign copy area 6 sf 48 sf 32 sf 50 sf 100 sf 45 sf 25 sf 60 sf Not permitted Max Height 8 sf 6 ft 8 sf 10 ft 16 ft 12 ft 8 ft 8 ft Not permitted Lighting Not permitted E/I E E/I/B E/I/B E/I/B E E/I Not permitted Total sign area Not permitted 25% of wall Not permitted 25% of wall 25% of wall Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Max Height Not permitted none Not permitted none none Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Lighting Not permitted external Not permitted external external Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Maximum coveage area Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted 35% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade 35% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade 35% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade 35% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade 20% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade 35% of window area, not to exceed 5% of building façade Max sign copy area per sign 2 sf 4 sf 4 sf 8 sf 8 sf 6 sf 8 sf 6 sf 6 sf Wall Height Not permitted 4 ft 4 ft 8 ft 8 ft 6 ft 8 ft 6 ft 6 ft Freestanding Height 2 ft 4 ft 4 ft 8 ft 8 ft 6 ft 8 ft 6 ft 6 ft FREESTANDING GRAPHIC WINDOW Table 1 1240.02 - Table 1: Sign Standards by Sign District WALL (c) Single pole support only. (b) M = monument, P = pole, O = temporary off-premise sign (see 1250.03) AUXILIARY (a) E = external, I = internal, B = backlit Planning Case #23-001 Applicant: Delkor Systems, Inc. Property Location: 4300 Round Lake Road W and 1987 Gateway Boulevard Request: Concept Plan Review for a Sign Standard Adjustment Zoning: GB, Gateway Business District Land Use: Light Industrial & Office 1 Round Lake Gateway No Approvals The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and ask questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and Applicant. No formal action can be taken at a Work Session. 2 Proposal –Concept Plan Review •Company:Delkor Systems, Inc. •Flexibility Requested •Sign District 7 allows for wall signage with a copy area of up to 45 square feet. •Proposing one wall sign with a 60-square-foot copy area on the western elevations of two Delkor buildings. 3 1A 1B Concept Plan Discussion •Allow flexibility to sign standards under City Code Section 1260.01 through Site Plan Review. •Amend the sign code to reclassify the Gateway Business Zoning District from Sign District 7 to Sign District 6. •Amend the sign code to increase the total sign copy area allowed for wall signs in Sign District 7 from 45 square feet to up to 60 square feet. 5 Sign Code Section 1240.02 6 Planning Case 23-001 – Concept Plan Review, 4300 Round Lake Road W and 1987 Gateway Boulevard Questions? Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM – 1D MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer John Morast and Thomas Jantscher – HR Green SUBJECT: Arden Manor Park & Floral Park Improvements Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $606,000 – Floral Park $TBD CDBG Funds, PIR – Parks $249,700 – Arden Manor Council Should Consider • Arden Manor Park Survey Results • Floral Park Survey Results • Improvements and amenities to add to each park improvements Background On April 12, 2021, City Council approved Resolution 2021-017 supporting the City’s application for a CDBG funding opportunity for Arden Manor Park. At a Work Session on November 15, 2021, Council discussed the proposed improvements at Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Hardcourt. At the November 22, 2021 Council meeting, the PSA with HR Green was approved to design and construct Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Hardcourt. This project was originally scheduled for completion in 2022, but was delayed due to drainage improvement investigation and a geotechnical evaluation to investigate the potential for contaminated soils within Arden Manor Park, those results came back negative. The Floral Park playground structure was built in 2001, through the City’s Park Maintenance Management Plan, park equipment is to be considered for replacement on a 20-year cycle. Within the 2023-2027 CIP, Floral Park is programmed for improvements in 2023. At the October 17, 2022 Works Session, City Council discussed amending the PSA with HR Green to add the Page 2 of 2 Per CIP: Roof work $ 30,000 Play structure $150,000 Hard courts $426,000 structure and other amenities to the project. On October 24, 2022, Council approved the PSA Amendment with HR Green. HR Green has completed a round of public engagement by surveying the nearby neighborhoods. The survey results can be found in Attachment A, Arden Manor Park and Attachment B, Floral Park. Discussion Council should review the survey results from both parks and provide feedback for the amenities and improvements HR Green should move forward with in design. Following the Work Session, HR Green will reach out to vendors that can provide the amenities desired and work to draft a design. The draft will be shared with Council and presented in an open-house style fashion at City Hall. This will then lead into final design, bidding and construction this year. Budget Impact The project funding is provided below: Funding Arden Manor Park: CDBG Program 189,700$ City PIR - Parks 60,000$ Total 249,700$ Floral Park: City PIR - Parks 606,000$ Total 606,000$ Primary elements of improvements at each park are, play structure replacement, play structure container replacement, hard court rehabilitation, trail improvements, ADA improvements, shelter improvements and other amenities. Project Costs: HR Green Contract 124,030$ Arden Manor Park Construction TBD Floral Park Construction TBD Total TBD Attachments Attachment A – Arden Manor Park Survey Report Attachment B – Floral Park Survey Report Attachment C – Presentation Slides Attachment D – Cost Information Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 1 Arden Manor Park Online Survey Questions and Responses 1. How often do you/your children use the park? a. Never b. Seldom (1-3 times per month) c. Occasionally (5-8 times per month) d. Often (more than 10 times per month) 23 respondents: 2 4 6 11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 NEVER SELDOM OCCASIONALLY OFTEN How often do you/your children use the park? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 2 2. What part of the park do you use or play on (can choose more than one) a. Swing set b. Play Structure c. Slides d. Grass fields e. Basketball court f. Shade Structure g. Picnic tables h. Grill 23 respondents: 15 12 15 10 15 16 13 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 SWING SET PLAY STRUCTURE SLIDES GRASS FIELDS BASKETBALL COURT SHADE STRUCTURE PICNIC TABLES GRILL What part of the park do you use or play on? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 3 3. Do you think Arden Manor Park needs to be updated? a. No b. Yes 23 respondents: 23 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 YES NO Do you think Arden Manor Park needs to be updated? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 4 4. What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? (can choose more than one) a. Slides b. Swings c. Monkey bars d. Climbers e. Play House f. Spinner g. Sensory/Activity panels h. Tunnel/Tube i. Benches j. Other – please list (see below) k. None 23 respondents: Other: a. Ice Rink b. Dual swing for child and adult same as Perry park c. Poured surface for ground would be ideal instead of the wood chips. The area is frequented by a lot of families so a much bigger structure that’s accessible to a wide range of ages would be good. Maybe something more like what’s at Spooner Park in Little Canada or Long Lake Park in New Brighton. 16 19 17 15 13 15 13 17 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 SLIDES SWINGS MONKEY BARS CLIMBERS PLAY HOUSE SPINNER SENSORY/ACTIVITY PANELS TUNNEL/TUBE BENCHES What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 5 d. Grandkids don’t like the playground equipment as old and broken e. Play structures for children of all ages f. Working with park mgmt to have more open hours at the swimming pool. Opening before school is finished and after Labor Day. g. Zip line swing h. Somewhere to play soccer i. Zip line. j. I would be so happy to see a baby's area... i have to drive 10 minutes to another park that has baby's area i would love to have a baby park k. Play structure needs update. Swings are to high for kids to get on them, a spinner would add a lot. I like the bridge, my daycare kids enjoyed playing tag on the structure. I used to go everyday with my daycare kids. The other okay structure by the Big Ten is not used very much. Needs some slides. Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 6 5. What types of court surfaces would you like to see? (can choose more than one) a. Basketball b. Tennis c. Pickleball d. Four Square e. Other – please list (see below) f. None 23 respondents: Other: a. Volleyball, there is a group of teens that set up and try to play b. Soccer field c. The BasketBall Court is the most participation among the middle and high school. Some adults too play with the above group. I have lived here for 27 years and that one court has been so good for less mischief, and crime. Updating it would be great. d. Basketball and skate boarding floor e. Skateboarding surface 21 12 11 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 BASKETBALL TENNIS PICKLEBALL FOUR SQUARE What types of court surfaces would you like to see? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 7 6. What would you like to see under the shade structure? (can choose more than one) a. Picnic tables b. Grills c. Meeting area d. Other – please list (see below) e. None 23 respondents: Other: a. Checker/chess board table like triangle park b. And keep the geese out! Can’t or don’t use as geese make suck a mess there c. More than one picnic table d. Benches e. The only time I use it is when I watch my grandson or other kids playing at the park. 22 6 9 0 5 10 15 20 25 PICNIC TABLES GRILLS MEETING AREA What would you like to see under the shade structure? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 8 7. What uses would you like to see for the grass fields? (can choose more than one) a. Soccer b. Baseball c. Football d. Frisbee golf e. Lacrosse f. Walking/activity trail g. Benches h. Nature/information stations i. Other – please list (see below) j. None 23 respondents: Other: a. Benches facing east, sunrise. And west, sunset b. I worry about activities like football and baseball as our bay window overlooks the grassy area. Please keep in mind that this area is very wet and soggy. It is prone to flooding with heavy rains. We have had to build a new shed that sits more than a foot off of the ground due to this flooding. Many times our shed has flooded. 2021 it had to be replaced as the floor boards were starting to rot out. c. Bike path 15 6 6 4 1 15 12 7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 SOCCER BASEBALL FOOTBALL FRISBEE GOLF LACROSSE WALKING/ACTIVITY TRAIL BENCHES NATURE/INFORMATION STATIONS What uses would you like to see for the grass fields? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 9 d. Since there are a lot of Hmong, Hispanic families, I don’t know what they would like. I know my grandson loved playing soccer when he was younger. For me walking trails and benches would be great. e. Big skatepark f. Skatepark Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 10 8. How often would you/your children use the park if it had new features? a. Never b. Seldom (1-3 times per month) c. Occasionally (5-8 times per month) d. Often (more than 10 times per month) 23 respondents: 0 2 4 17 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 NEVER SELDOM OCCASIONALLY OFTEN How often would you/your children use the park if had new features? Arden Manor Park Improvements Online Survey Results 11 9. What other improvements not listed would you like to see in the park, if any? a. Please list 23 respondents: a. Better park for everyone b. Art, sculptures Water fountain Relaxing benches/ lounge chairs Skate/scooter rsmp c. Connect it to other parks via trails d. Flowers e. The children’s play equipment definitely needs an upgrade - thank you for taking the time to look into this and helping create positive change! Our family appreciates it! f. Please continue with buckthorn removal. g. Parking!!! The manager of park has posted no parking near the entrance of play area and tornado shelter so parking close to play area would be great, the field area around play area is kind of marshy , makes difficult to walk etc there/more walking paths to area h. Better upkeep so it stays appealing all year. i. Some lighting j. Updated flooring in playground area k. Shade trees. Possibly, a public garden. l. I don't have children, but think they should have a fun, safe area. I would also like to see improvements to driveways and tree maintenance. m. Lights n. No other improvements though I’d like for the grass field to not be changed just cause it’s nice to see natural life there. o. The park needs to be rebuilt. Some shade and grills would be nice, more benches and picnic tables. Te kids deserve something better. p. Cloth or chain nets on the basketball hoops. q. More child friendly. r. Lights in the basketball court s. Just baby area please t. Play Structure for that in between age 10-12. Maybe more climbing structure, one higher slide. u. Get rid of weeds in playground v. Skatepark w. Skatepark Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 1 Floral Park Online Survey Questions and Responses 1. How often do you/your children use the park? a. Never b. Seldom (1-3 times per month) c. Occasionally (5-8 times per month) d. Often (more than 10 times per month) 74 respondents: 0 20 17 37 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 NEVER SELDOM OCCASTIONALLY OFTEN How often do you /your children use the park? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 2 2. What part of the park do you use or play on a. Swing set b. Play Structure / slides c. Basketball court d. Tennis Court e. Shade Structure f. Picnic tables g. Benches h. Community garden i. Port-a-potty 74 respondents: 46 50 23 34 23 25 33 27 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 SWING SET PLAY STRUCTURE/SLIDES BASKETBALL COURT TENNIS COURT SHADE STRUCTURE PICNIC TABLES COMMUNITY GARDEN PORT-A-POTTY What part of the park do you use or play on? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 3 3. Do you think Floral needs to be updated? a. Yes b. No 74 respondents: 65 9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 YES NO Do you think Floral Park needs to be updated? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 4 4. What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? (can choose more than one) a. Slides b. Swings c. Monkey bars d. Climbers e. Play House f. Spinner g. Sensory/Activity panels h. Tunnel/Tube i. Benches j. Other – please list (see below) k. None 74 respondents: Other: a. Teeter tauter b. obstacle course c. Better bathroom. d. I babysit my grandkids 2x a week and we love going to Floral Park even though the play area is sad. We would love to see more climbing, new swings, comfortable slides, user friendly for older kids. Somehow adults think that kids over 6 don't want to play at parks and that isn't true. I have 4 grandkids ages 4-13 and they all love to climb. My son and his kids live over by 47 51 36 45 23 23 18 31 49 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 SLIDES SWINGS MONKEY BARS CLIMBERS PLAY HOUSE SPINNER SENSORY/ACTIVITY PANELS TUNNEL/TUBE BENCHES What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 5 Cummings and they are very disappointed in the new park because their 7 year old get bored and there is only 2 swings. So I am hoping Floral gets a better update. Floral doesn't have to be fancy - their is fun and beauty in simplicity. e. Zip line Tire swing f. Ninja warrior Tire swing g. Something for all ages. There currently isn’t a climber or slide for toddler age kids. h. The current equipment is so tall it requires very close adult help for our toddler/preschooler age kids, thus we usually choose parks farther away for safety. I think we would play there a lot more with more modern equipment. We always love seeing inclusive and accessible playground setups! Paying attention to entrances and curb cuts to get up and into the playground area for wheelchair accessible space-also beneficial for strollers! Would love to see equipment that appeals to a variety of ages as we hope to use it over the years! i. Climbing walls, splash pad j. Trail work out stations k. I have pre-teen children. They dislike the new playsets at Cummings Park because it "baby-fied" the playground. My older son would like swings he can jump off of. l. Bars to swing on m. There are a few big trees hanging over the play areas and path that are dead. We have concerns about branches falling down and causing injuries. n. Just more benches. No more playground equipment. Fix the tennis court, softball field. Do not put in a pickleball court. Cut the dead trees down. o. Unique swings that are accessible for all - some swings have the option for the parent to face the child. Small rock climbing structure. p. Improved ground cover under play structure q. Fresh wood chips would be a good start. The park looked the worst it has looked this past summer and we’ve lived in walking distance with 2 kids and dogs for the past 10 years so we are in the park nearly daily. r. Hello, The current slide and playground is cracking and falling apart in certain spots. This is really un safe for the kids the and can cause injuries. Floral park has a great natural environment feel with lot of trees and flowers. One thing I did notice while using the park is that it seems to take a long time to dry after it rains. This can make the playground muddy and slippery which is dangerous. Also, the old school wood chips for soft landing isn't a good option anymore. The kids get splinters sometimes when the chips get into their shoes. Rubber turf would be much better option. s. Zip line t. Winter off-leash dog park u. Something for older kids. Skate ramp? v. We love Floral Park! There needs to be a sidewalk from the tennis courts to the playground area. Currently it is cumbersome to get from one to the other…. You either walking on a dirt path through the trees or going down to the street and fighting traffic on Royal Lane (which is too fast and approaches at a blind right angle). It is especially bad for bikes or strollers that cannot use the entrance steps. The main play equipment is nice, though the triple slide is awful and our young kids (3-7yrs) avoid it because it hurts them to go over the bumps and wiggles. A plain slide (either straight or corkscrew) would be much more appreciated! The location of the port-a-potty is on a hill. It’s so nice having a toilet nearby, but I wish it could be on better grading as it always sits at an angle which makes it difficult for littles to use. I’d suggest a cement pad beneath it or relocating somewhere nearby to flat ground. w. Chess/checkers table like triangle park. Dual swing for child/adult like perry park Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 6 x. What is the seems fine, but maybe a small area for toddlers. Like at Royal Hills. y. Fix the baseball field. Stop relying on shoreview to shoulder this. Our city must do better. z. Any play structure would get a ton of use. Many families use the one that exists now even though it is small. aa. Splash pad bb. Some equipment that can be used for children with different abilities. cc. Play structure that kids can climb on, big slides, burn off energy. Slides at this park currently are good- please dont take away the large slides like happened at Cummings park. Cummings used to have such large, fun slides, bridges to cross, etc. and they were all taken away. Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 7 5. What types of court surfaces would you like to see? (can choose more than one) a. Basketball b. Tennis c. Pickleball d. Four Square e. Other – please list (see below) f. None 74 respondents: Other: a. Disk golf course b. 9-hole Disc Golf course c. Just throwing this out, but what about badmitton and volleyball? I see a lot of people want to play volleyball at Cummings park. Maybe Floral park is too small to accommodate that, but wanted to mention it.I'm not dying to play volleyball, but others may be interested? d. Volleyball, a soccer net/field goal posts on the opposite side of the baseball diamond. e. My husband plays tennis and it would be great to have a usable court nearby. I also see kids playing basketball. Both of those courts need to be resurfaced. f. No pickle ball. It will ruin our nice little park and our neighborhood cannot handle the parking load g. But not at the expense of the open green space, by the play structure, which is so nice for kids to run on. h. No pickleball. i. Gaga ball 45 47 50 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 BASKETBALL TENNIS PICKLEBALL FOUR SQUARE What type of court surfaces would you like to see? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 8 j. Fence around basketball area to stop balls from going into the road and the woods behind the east hoop. k. Hello, I live right next to the park and I have 3 kids 6,4,2 and know of three other families with 3 kids and many more with two kids. We have discussed an updated basketball court with adjustable hoops would be great for the community. It would be great to consider skate/bike park for the kids to use in the summer that could be converted into a Ice rink in the winter. I know the Oval in Roseville has this set up. l. Fix the baseball fixed. And fix Cummins also. m. The tennis and basketball courts are used by several families and groups of kids every nice day. We live right next to Floral Park and see how often it gets used. I imagine pickle ball and four square markings would get a ton of use, too. n. I will defer to folks that use the courts. We use the playgrounds only. Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 9 6. What would you like to see under the shade structure? (can choose more than one) a. Picnic tables b. Grills c. Meeting area d. Other – please list (see below) e. None 74 respondents: Other: a. Recycling and Trash--I'm pretty sure they are there, but just adding because I can't remember if there is a recycling bin there. b. More than one area for picnic tables c. Kitchenettes, sinks, prep/serving counters, running water, bathrooms, lights Make it more user friendly for outdoor gatherings. d. Water fountain e. More garbage and recycling cans f. Nicer garbage and recycling receptacles. g. Some type of serving countertop. Electricity would be ideal but probably not in the plan? h. Hammock i. Lounge chairs j. W k. Water fountain for drinking. l. Relaxing chairs 67 27 24 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 PICNIC TABLES GRILLS MEETING AREA What would you like to see under the shade structure? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 10 7. Would you like to see improvements to the water source for community garden? a. Yes b. No 74 respondents: 49 25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 YES NO Would you like to see improvements to the water source for the community garden? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 11 8. Would you like to see bike parking? a. Yes b. No 74 respondents: 55 19 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 YES NO Would you like to see bike parking? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 12 9. Would you like to see a path between the main park area and the sport courts? a. Yes b. No 74 respondents: 62 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 YES NO Would you like to see a path between the main park area and the sport courts? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 13 10. How often would you/your children use the park if it had new features? a. Never b. Seldom (1-3 times per month) c. Occasionally (5-8 times per month) d. Often (more than 10 times per month) 74 respondents: 3 8 13 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 NEVER SELDOM OCCASIONALLY OFTEN How often would you/your children use the park if it had new features? Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 14 11. What other improvements not listed would you like to see in the park, if any? a. Please list 74 respondents: a. N/A b. ? c. More info for the honeybee area d. Paths and trails e. First, I wanted to mention that you asked if we wanted to see updates to Floral park. I struggled with whether to put yes or no. Next time it might be nice if you had some sort of way that people can respond with how MUCH they want something done (such as a scale of 1-10). I'm certainly not against improvements to Floral park, but at the same time I don't think anything is super urgent. One thing I am not sure about, is when is the right time to replace play structures. The play structure at Floral park gets used alot, and it is wonderful to have it there. However, I don't think it's worth replacing it at this point. I used to go use Cummings park alot wtih my child, and I was very surprised when the city replaced the play structure. It was still in fantastic condition, in my view, so it didn't seem like the best use of city funds. The play structure at Floral park seems in relatively good condition as well--so not sure if it's really time to replace it? I walk through that park literally every day, and play with my child there many days as well. I think it's a nice, small park and I love the flower gardens and little trails around it. I was suprised your survey didn't mention the flower gardens, as that is a huge part of the park. I think it would be good to more formally upgrade the garden beds a little bit and make them a bit more structured. Maybe some bricks around the garden bed or that sort of thing? Then, you could ask for volunteers to do various tasks for the garden each year. I know George Kruse and another guy take care of the gardens, which is wonderful. I think it would be good to more formally invite others in the community on a regular basis to help out at Floral park. The city could even do a bit of programming there for adults and kids (monarchs, perennial gardening, composting, etc...). I said I'd like to see a bike rack--it would be nice, but not super necessary. It's such a small park it's not like I worried that people would steal my bike while I was there. I do appreciate the porta-potty in the summer, it's really nice to have it there. It would be nice to have water there, if you're going to upgrade the water for gardening, it would be nice if it was drinkable too, if that' was not too expensive. I would suggest making sure the sidewalks are maintained well there, as many people walk and bike through that park every day. In addition, it would be good to have more flexible seating there, under the shade area. I think some people, like seniors or people with various disabilities might have issues getting into the picnic table benches. Might be good to have seating that's somehow more flexible for those kinds of folks as well. f. I volunteer at the park maintaining an owls nest that I built and installed in 2018. The pair of Great Horned owls there have raised 2 sets of owlets and are preparing now to nest again and lay eggs. I'm am VERY CONCERNED about the plan to remove dead trees at this park. Dead/dying trees are an integral part of an owls habitat, along with other Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 15 birds and wildlife that live in this park. Rodents live in decaying wood that the owls feed on. Please keep the wooded part of the park natural. Owls are a protected species in the state of Minnesota as well. I would like to speak to someone on what exactly the plan is for tree removal in Floral Park. Would you be able to take a phone call this week and talk? Please let me know. Thank you. Trista Snapko 651-230-1273 g. tennis courts h. Water fountain; scavenger hunts i. More picnic tables/meeting areas - perhaps by the butterfly garden or in shaded areas. Only one family at a time can currently use the picnic tables. A separate area for trash and recycling so that when you sit at the picnic tables, you don't smell trash/dog waste. Safer and more parking options. More signage since it's difficult to find the hidden baseball field. Have some of the field be for soccer or have nets just set up for individual practice. Thanks for asking for input! We love our parks! j. The pavilion needs major attention. Needs to be upgraded and offer more features. It would be nice if along the walking paths there are added in fitness stations. Ex: pull up bar, balance equipment stops. I think if the pavilion gets updated; that you will need to add in some parking, or allow for both sides of the street to have parking. It's an amazing park that's incomplete, making it less utilized. k. We most frequently use the walking path l. I walk at Floral Park everyday sometimes 2x. I love the park. I would appreciate having the paths resurfaced. I would also love to see the 2 dead oaks removed so that the small oak trees can grow. The trees are what make Floral Park so beautiful. I also love spending time in the butterfly garden. So peaceful. Please work to keep Floral a calming experience with nature. m. It would be great to have a real washroom instead of a porta potty. n. Full field house w/bathrooms o. Larger play structure space with a big kid area and and little kid area. More swings (kids are always fighting over them) p. I would like to see regular maintenance of the entire park area. This summer, the playground area was covered with prickly weeds which made it difficult to use with a small child. We found ourselves walking to parks further away. The baseball field is also in rough shape. Also, along the walking trail I would love to see dog poop stands/trash bins. That would hopefully help with waste issues around the walking trails. q. The current slide on playground is dangerous and painful! Water feature would be nice :-) r. N/A s. N/A t. Bathroom u. If the basketball court stays in the same location, would love a fence to surround it. When we play basketball with our kids, balls go into the street which is dangerous with cars driving by. We are constantly watching for cars because of this safety concern. v. Remove dead trees and plant new ones. Maintenance of park “as is” is important after above improvements. Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 16 w. Walking path x. Improvements to the walking trails. More trash and dog poop bag stations on the trails. Much more park and street lighting to keep people out of the park after dark. Also, lots more parking direction signs on the street - too many people park in both sides of the street. y. I love the trails, including the unpaved ones. z. More butterfly gardens aa. Tennis courts need to be resurfaced; the path around the park could be re-done, the picnic shelter needs to be replaced/is damaged, picnic tables are old and icky. Also, there should be some wood chips or something under the play structure. A seasonal ice rink would be so nice in this area! bb. My 4yo said to ask for a skate park like shoreview community center and a swimming pool. I told them I wouldn’t hold my breath but would relay the request. Haha! cc. Keep it clean and patrol it often to keep people away that use the park for mischief. dd. Improve the trails and thin out underbrush in woodland areas. ee. Bases for the baseball diamond and some soccer nets in the field. ff. Resurface paths. Improve walking paths in woods. gg. Water fountain or place to fill up water bottles, activities for all ages, bouncy rubber flooring (similar to the park by the shoreview community center) hh. I would like to see the street parking for the park to be on the park side of the road so the kids don’t have to cross the street. It is so dangerous especially since it’s on a curve. You can’t see when cars are coming. ii. These improvements would greatly enhance the park jj. Removal of dead trees and invasive plants. Doggie bags and area to dispose if waste. Off leash dog area. kk. Pickleball ll. The park is excellent for me as is. I use it mainly for walking. I used to use the tennis courts, but have not used them for several years. My only requests would be to extend the porta potty season by a month in fall and spring and to improve the northwest trail entrance. It is steep and very hard to use when covered with ice/snow. A handrail would help a lot. Maybe it could be re-graded to make it less steep. mm. A lot of people already treat the open field like it is an off leash dog park so it would be nice if there was an actual dedicated dog area. I would like to be able to send my kids with our leashed dog there without worrying about off leash dogs. nn. Na oo. Would love for the basketball court/hoops to be redone and for soccer goals to be added to baseball field area pp. Security cameras qq. More mulch on paths through wooded areas. rr. Anything that will be more inclusive/experience enhancement for those with disabilities. ss. not to expensive tt. The walking path is falling apart and needs to be redone. The walking path is a great way to keep the community active and social. Around the playground it would be nice to Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 17 have a separate bike or rollerblading path next to the existing path for the kids. There are elderly people and young kids who use this part of the path and sometimes not having a designated path for bikes, scooters, and rollerblades creates an unsafe space for everyone trying to use the path. uu. Just some updates! We live in walking distance but our kids prefer parks further away because they are “more fun.” Examples: Cummings park and shoreview community center vv. Would like to see the courts transitioned to pickle ball. I’ve never seen anyone play tennis there. We need more pickle ball options. ww. Hand water pump. Potable water. xx. Winter off leash dog park yy. Bridge where there is currently just a wood plank along the woodland trail. zz. An updated larger player ground that makes better use of the land. Or at least maintain the land, this summer was terrible. aaa. Native flower plantings for bee and bird habitat bbb. Signage about the wetland on the east. More things like the pollinator garden and the bees. Some5hing on phenology, maybe plants marked for visitors to report on? ccc. Art- sculpture? Place to take cool selfies…. Places to lay down and relax in the sun. Reclining lawn chairs. ddd. -The main play equipment is nice, though the triple slide is awful and our young kids (3-7yrs) avoid it because it hurts them to go over the bumps and wiggles. A plain slide (either straight or corkscrew) would be much more appreciated! -The location of the port-a-potty is on a hill. It’s so nice having a toilet nearby, but I wish it could be on better grading as it always sits at an angle which makes it difficult for littles to use. I’d suggest a cement pad beneath it or relocating somewhere nearby to flat ground. eee. the play structure is outdated and needs to get updated. fff. Better markers for types of flowers in butterfly garden. More flowers Drinking fountain ggg. Paths that make sense hhh. More Recreation Programs! iii. Can the open field be used for softball/baseball or be enclosed for a dog park? jjj. For the path between the main park and the sport courts, I am fine with the natural existing path. kkk. Baseball. So many kids are playing and Arden Hills must be more active in this. lll. New hoops with the basketball court mmm. Different age areas nnn. We would LOVE to see a board on the fence in the tennis court that allows a single person to hit a tennis ball by themselves. Perhaps more seating around the play structure. ooo. A water fountain ppp. It’s a great park! We LOVE the nature trails. A better playground would be amazing though! Floral Park Improvements Online Survey Results 18 qqq. Poured surface on the ground in the play area, proper grading of slides so water doesn’t pool on them after a rain. Play equipment and swings for a wide range of ages, from toddler to 10+. rrr. There were only yes or no options for item 7. I need more information about 7 to respond appropriately, please list my response as none. sss. We live across the street from Floral Park and use the facilities year-round on a nearly daily basis. The paved trails, wooded hiking trails and courts are great. We have two kids, 6 and 4, and the playground equipment represents the biggest opportunity for improvement. We all look forward to the new-and-improved Floral Park in the years to come! ttt. Bike parking is a great idea. We drop our bikes so many times while taking the hiking paths and I never feel quite comfortable with the bikes just dropped in the grass at the entrance to the hiking trails. uuu. It would be great to have drinking fountains. Also more benches by the basketball court and tennis court. vvv. Could you please pay special attention to the low points of the walking trails. There are a few spots that flood and ice over. The spots on the top of my head are the curve in the path from the playground to the softball field and the small steep hill on the north side exiting to Briarknoll Drive. It would be nice to build up some of those low points for those of us that are fairly clumsy, or have other health problems that impact mobility. I would love to see playground equipment that has something for all ages. Please keep a baby swing. We were absolutely bummed when the Cummings park baby swing was removed. We don't feel comfortable using the handicapped swing in case someone who actually needs it would like to swing. The parking signs along Royal Lane might need replacing as well. Possibly a no parking between signs could be the best option? I've noticed people tend to park just on the west side of the trail entrance from Royal Lane. Judging from the remaining small amount of yellow paint along the curb it looks like the original intention was for the no parking to go a little further. ARDEN HILLS ARDEN MANOR/FLORAL PARK UPDATES January 17, 2023 –Council Work Session Presentation Presented by: John Morast, PE and Thomas Jantscher, PE 1/17/2023 1 Project Title Location Parks Projects Overviews Arden Manor Park CDBG funding application Outdated play structures Accessibility Drainage/flooding issues Future phase Update ballcourt Shelter outdated/repair needs Public input/involvement 1/17/2023 2 Project Title Location Parks Projects Overviews Floral Park Combined ballcourt/park improvements Ballcourt updates (basketball, pickleball, etc.) Outdated play structures Shelter outdated and damaged Repave trail Public input/involvement 1/17/2023 3 Project Title Location Public Involvement Developed project surveys Opened SurveyMonkey surveys Posted survey posters, door hangers, mailings Poster in City Hall Published links on website 1/17/2023 4 Project Title Location Survey Results –Arden Manor Open 33 days (10/27–11/28), 23 responses (see Survey Results doc for details) 1/17/2023 5 16 19 17 15 13 15 13 17 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 SLIDES SWINGS MONKEY BARS CLIMBERS PLAY HOUSE SPINNER SENSORY/ACTIVITY PANELS TUNNEL/TUBE BENCHES What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? 21 12 11 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 BASKETBALL TENNIS PICKLEBALL FOUR SQUARE What types of court surfaces would you like to see? * ** * * Project Title Location Survey Results –Arden Manor Open 33 days (10/27–11/28), 23 responses (see Survey Results doc for details) 1/17/2023 6 22 6 9 0 5 10 15 20 25 PICNIC TABLES GRILLS MEETING AREA What would you like to see under the shade structure? 15 6 6 4 1 15 12 7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 SOCCER BASEBALL FOOTBALL FRISBEE GOLF LACROSSE WALKING/ACTIVITY TRAIL BENCHES NATURE/INFORMATION STATIONS What uses would you like to see for the grass fields? Project Title Location Survey Results –Floral Open 44 days (11/21–1/3), 74 responses (see Survey Results doc for details) 1/17/2023 7 47 51 36 45 23 23 18 31 49 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 SLIDES SWINGS MONKEY BARS CLIMBERS PLAY HOUSE SPINNER SENSORY/ACTIVITY PANELS TUNNEL/TUBE BENCHES What types of play structures would you like to see in the play area? ** *45 47 50 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 BASKETBALL TENNIS PICKLEBALL FOUR SQUARE What type of court surfaces would you like to see? * * Project Title Location Survey Results –Floral Open 44 days (11/21–1/3), 74 responses (see Survey Results doc for details) 1/17/2023 8 67 27 24 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 PICNIC TABLES GRILLS MEETING AREA What would you like to see under the shade structure? Project Title Location Public Involvement –Survey Overview In general, public input includes Benches, monkey bars, swings, slides, climbers, etc Toddler areas, multi-age equipment, Detailed survey results in survey results document 1/17/2023 9 Project Title Location Basketball and Tennis Courts 1/17/2023 10 Repave Restripe Basketball Tennis Pickleball Four square Access Updated fencing Maintenance and ADA access 4-square Basketball Court Pickleball Court Tennis Court Combine Court Striping Project Title Location Playground 1/17/2023 11 Equipment Types Play Structures, Swings, Monkey Bars, Benches, Toddler Area, Shade Equipment Costs Costs vary depending on vendors, complexity, size, etc. Playground Area Arden Manor Park -~4,500 sq. ft. (roughly 88 ft. by 50 ft.) Floral Park -~2,650 sq. ft. (roughly 60 ft. by 40 ft.) Limited area for equipment, accessibility, toddler area, etc. Project Title Location Playground Equipment Vendors 1/17/2023 12 Variety of Vendors Reaching out to seven vendors Gain interest in project Variety of equipment Variety of prices and price points Discuss options for limited space Bidding options Single vendor for project Project Title Location Next Steps Equipment Types and Numbers Open House Design Decisions Finalize Design, Bidding Options Project Bidding/Construction 1/17/2023 13 QUESTIONS 1/17/2023 14 Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Playground Equipment Cost Information 1 Playground Equipment Cost Information SWINGS BENCHES $4000 - $6000 $800 - $1000 SLIDES MONKEY BARS $2000 - $5000 $6,000 - $12,000 TUNNEL/TUBE CLIMBERS – SMALL $3000 - $5000+ $5,000 - $15,000 Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Playground Equipment Cost Information 2 CLIMBERS – LARGE CLIMBING CAVE/WALLS $20,000 - $50,000+ $5,000 - $15,000 TRADITIONAL STEEL SLIDE PICNIC TABLE $10,000 - $12,000 $2,000 - $5,000 TUNNEL/CRAWLWAY FABRIC SHADE STRUCTURE $10,000 - $15,000 $10,000 - $12,000 Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Playground Equipment Cost Information 3 SAMPLE MULTI-COMPONENT STRUCTURES SLIDE/STAIR/CLIMBER COMBINATIONS PRICE RANGES Approx. $10,000 (toddler) Approx. $16,000 (toddler) Approx. $25,000 (pre-school) Approx. $40,000 Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Playground Equipment Cost Information 4 Approx. $70,000 Page 1 of 4 AGENDA ITEM – 1E MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning Case 22-025 – Concept Plan Review Kerri Seemann – Home Occupation Ordinance Amendment Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should consider a request for a Concept Plan Review, submitted by Kerri Seemann of 1947 County Road D West (“Applicant”). The request is for an ordinance amendment to the city code for a Class I or Class II Home Occupation, which would allow exterior evidence of a home-based business. The Applicant is seeking feedback from the City Council on proposed ordinance amendments in advance of the full submission; a Text Amendment is required for the proposed ordinance amendments and a Conditional Use Permit for a Class II Home Occupation. The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments and questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is nonbinding to the City and Applicant (Section 1320.14, Subd 4 of the Zoning Code). No formal action can be taken at a Work Session. A formal application will be subject to the full review process, including a public hearing with Planning Commission and City Council review. Background Last fall, the Applicant inquired with the City as to the process to apply for a home occupation at the Subject Property. The Applicant indicated that the home-based business would be a nursery that would include deliveries and/or customers visiting the premise. City staff provided the Applicant with the license application form and City Code Section 1325.06, Subd. 3 – Home Occupations and then reviewed the differences between a Class I and Class II Home Occupation. Based on the initial business description given, city staff advised the Applicant that this would likely fall under a Class II Home Occupation triggering a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). In December, the Applicant submitted a formal land use application to the City for a CUP to allow a Class II Home Occupation at the Subject Property. Upon reviewing the application, city Page 2 of 4 staff identified that the CUP submission was incomplete and sent a 15.99 letter notifying the Applicant of the missing information. One of the factors for determining that the application was incomplete was due to the following: • Based on the description of the proposed home occupation, a city code amendment would also be required due to the proposed home occupation as stated being conducted primarily exterior of the dwelling with the plantings, customer retail space, and outdoor sales area. Currently, the City Code Section 1325.02, Subd. 3 requires that all home occupations shall comply with the following: i. It shall not result in traffic, parking, noise, light, fumes and odors to such an extent that it is noticeable that the property is being used for non-residential purposes. ii. It shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling. iii. There is no exterior evidence of the home occupation. iv. It does not require any special entrances to the dwelling. Following receipt of the letter, city staff met with the Applicant to review possible next steps for continuing the pursuit of the home occupation as described. For the concept review, the Applicant has submitted language for two proposed ordinance amendments for City Council consideration in advance of a future land use application. Aerial Map of Subject Property Discussion City Code Section 1325.02 Subd. 3, Home Occupations The Applicant is proposing to operate a nursery on the Subject Property as an accessory home occupation. As described, the majority of the business activities would be conducted from an accessory structure (i.e. detached garage or shed) and/or outside of the residence in the rear yard Page 3 of 4 of the property. The nursery will feature plant sales of native species that are not commonly sold by local growers or garden centers. The home occupation will be an expansion of the Applicant’s existing garden that is used in their own yard. The plants would be grown in plug trays stored on benches so that they are raised off the ground. A typical size of the benches are 4’ x 8’ or 4’ x 12’. The Applicant anticipates starting with two to four benches attributed to the home occupation, but would be seeking flexibility in order to allow for business growth. Retail sales and customer orders would be conducted exclusively online. Customer order pickup would be “by appointment” only. The home occupation may require an occasional delivery of pots, packs, etc., but the Applicant anticipates this would occur only a handful of times per year. Home Occupations are allowed as an accessory use or conditional use under City Code Section 1325.02, Subd. 3. There are thresholds listed in the ordinance for the home occupation that distinguishes the differences between a Class I or Class II Home Occupation (i.e. employees, deliveries, customers visiting the premise, and size of the home occupation within the dwelling). However, the ordinance specifies that all home occupations (i.e. Class I and Class II) are required to comply with the following four conditions: 1. It shall not result in traffic, parking, noise, light, fumes and odors to such an extent that it is noticeable that the property is being used for non-residential purposes. 2. It shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling. 3. There is no exterior evidence of the home occupation. 4. It does not require any special entrances to the dwelling. For the concept review, the Applicant is seeking feedback from the City Council on considering a code (text) amendment to allow home occupations to be conducted outside of the dwelling (i.e. either an accessory building or not being required to be inside a building – exterior of dwelling) and to allow exterior evidence of the home occupation. The Applicant has provided language for two amendments as part of their submission. City staff would note that if changes were made to the two provisions as suggested it is likely that there will be other provisions within the home occupation section that would be impacted and need to be amended. The degree of changes would be dependent on direction of the City Council for handling of this request. See Attachment D for City Code Section 1325.02, Subd. 3 in its entirety. Proposed Code Amendments The Applicant has submitted the following proposed ordinance amendments: • In section 1325.02 of the city code (Accessory Uses), under Subdivision 3 (Home Occupations), I would like the council to consider moving line A.2. (“It shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling.”) to part B (Class I Accessory Home Occupations). According to the Applicant, this would allow business activity outside the home (in an accessory structure or elsewhere on the property), but only as a Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupation. • Also in 1325.02, Subdivision 3, under part C (Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupations), I would like the council to consider amending line 1.c (“It does not occupy more than thirty-three percent of the floor area of the dwelling”) to say “It does not occupy more than thirty-three percent of the floor area of the dwelling or accessory building, or 500 square feet of external property if not visible from the road.” Page 4 of 4 According to the Applicant, this number is somewhat arbitrary, but I thought it might be better to have a set square footage rather than a percentage of the property in case there is a significant difference in lot sizes. Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Location Map B. Land Use Application C. Applicant Narrative D. City Code Section 1325.02 Location Map Tax Parcels _Query result Personal Property Tax Parcels Cities County Offices 1/9/2023, 9:43:29 AM 0 0.06 0.120.03 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:3,600 Ramsey County Ramsey County MN Page 1 of 3 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.cityofardenhills.org For Office Use Only Planning Case No. 23- Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2023 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant: Address: Telephone No.: Other: Fax No.: Email Address: Property Information Property Owner: Owner Address: Owner Telephone No. Other: Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: Property ID No.: Type of Use: Zone: Property Acreage: Type of Request Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Fee: $550 + Escrow: $2,500) Conditional Use or Interim Use Permit/CUP or IUP Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Preliminary Plat (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Plat (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,000) Concept Plan Review (Fee: $300 + Escrow: $750) Master Planned Unit Development or Master Special Development Plan (Fee: $600 + Escrow: $2,500) Final Planned Unit Development or Final Special Development Plan (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $2,000) Planned Unit Development Amendment or Special Development Plan Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) Site Plan Review (Fee: $450 + Escrow: $1,500) Rezoning or TCAAP Regulating Plan Amendment (Fee: $500 + Escrow: $1,500) Zoning Code or TCAAP Redevelopment Code Amendment (Fee: $400 + Escrow: $1,500) City Code Amendment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Lot Split/Minor Subdivision (R-1 and R-2 Districts Only) (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,500) Variance or Permitted Adjustment (Fee: $350 + Escrow: $1,000) Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Appeal of Administrative Decision (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000) Land Use Requests – Not Already Specified (Fee: $150 + Escrow: $1,000 Lot 7 Blk 4 1947 County Road D West 651-633-0909 651-353-5891 Residential Page 2 of 3 Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaining the project): Filing & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the Community Development Director to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the Community Development Director or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. A checklist with additional application requirements can be found at www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications. Complete/Incomplete Applications Under Minnesota Statute, Chapter 15.99, cities have 15 business days to review all plans and application materials to ensure they satisfy City requirements. During the 15 day review period, planning staff will provide written comments on the application and may request plan revisions. If the application is determined to be complete, Minnesota State Statute then requires the City to approve or deny the application within 60 days, up to 120 days. If not complete, the City may require plan revisions and/or additional information before the application is scheduled for Planning Commission review and/or C ity Council action. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the Community Development Director. Payment of Fees and Escrows The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Each separate land use request shall be charged a separate administrative fee and escrow even if submitted on the same application. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include planning and engineering staff time, City Attorney and consulting fees, and mailing costs. If, at any time, a required cash escrow is depleted to less than 20 percent of its original amount, the applicant shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all fees have been paid. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. The escrow may be reduced or increased by the Community Development Director on a project by project basis. Notice of Meeting Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. *IMPORTANT* Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398-3070 for additional information. The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. All applications will be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of consultant costs associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of application in the form of an escrow to the City. I would like the council to consider an ordinance amendment to allow activity related to an accessory home occupation to occur outside the dwelling--whether in an accessory structure or outdoors. Page 3 of 3 Meeting Schedule Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday of each month at 6:30 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. The schedules below are for reference purposes only. Project will not be scheduled for any meeting until the application submittal is found to be complete by the Community Development Director. 2023 Planning Commission and City Council Schedule (*subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the first Wednesday after the first Monday at 6:30 p.m.) TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE* (Generally held on the fourth Monday at 7:00 p.m.) DEADLINE FOR LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMISSION (1st day of the preceding month) January 4 January 23 December 1 (2022) February 8 February 27 January 2 March 8 March 27 February 1 April 5 April 24 March 1 May 3 May 22 April 3 June 7 June 26 May 1 July 5 July 24 June 1 August 9 August 28 July 3 September 6 September 25 August 1 October 4 October 23 September 1 November 8 November 27 October 2 December 6 January 8 (2024) November 1 Acknowledgement and Signature I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate per city code and ordinance requirements . I fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. __________________________________________________ ________________ Property Owner Signature (Required) Date ________________________________________________ ________________ Applicant Signature (If different than t he property owner) Date Please contact the Community Development Director at 651-792-7800 if you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City’s website: www.cityofardenhills.org/landuseapplications Jan. 5, 2023 ● In section 1325.02 of the city code (Accessory Uses), under Subdivision 3 (Home Occupations), I would like the council to consider moving line A.2. (“It shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling.”) to part B (Class I Accessory Home Occupations). ○ This would allow business activity outside the home (in an accessory structure or elsewhere on the property), but only as a Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupation. ● Also in 1325.02, Subdivision 3, under part C (Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupations), I would like the council to consider amending line 1.c (“It does not occupy more than thirty-three percent of the floor area of the dwelling”) to say “It does not occupy more than thirty-three percent of the floor area of the dwelling or accessory building, or 500 square feet of external property if not visible from the road.” ○ This number is somewhat arbitrary, but I thought it might be better to have a set square footage rather than a percentage of the property in case there is a significant difference in lot sizes. ● In section 1325.02 of the city code (Accessory Uses), under Subdivision 3 (Home Occupations), I would like the council to consider moving line A.3. (“There is no exterior evidence of the home occupation.”) to part B (Class I Accessory Home Occupations). ● If that were to change, I would also suggest adding a line to part C.1. stating that “The home occupation and the conduct thereof shall not impair the residential character of the premises nor impair the reasonable use, enjoyment, and value of other residential property in the neighborhood.” I have always enjoyed growing plants. After more than a decade working in the nursery industry, when I grow plants for my own use in my yard, I prefer growing them in the manner that is familiar to me: in plug trays. But rather than using the packs that are standard for retail sales, I prefer these deep plug trays that produce better root systems. ⇨ After seeing the results I had this past growing season, I had a friend ask me to grow plants for her, too. Another said that she knows other people who would like to buy my plants. But that sounds like a business… one that is not allowed by the current city code because it’s outside the home. So far, most of the seedling production I have done has taken place on the back side of the house, where even my neighbors had no idea of the extent of my plant production. But if I can expand my production (grow more species and in larger quantities), I would need to use other parts of the yard. I have spoken with the neighbors who would be most directly impacted by this and have their support for adding benches on which to grow the plants. You might be wondering why I would want to use benches rather than growing the plants directly on the ground. There are two reasons. 1. We have rabbits in our yard. Raising the plants off the ground would reduce the risk of damage. 2. Invasive Asian Jumping Worms (Amynthas agrestis) can be found in Ramsey County and are a serious threat. Several organizations that used to rely heavily on donated plants (divisions from people’s gardens) for plant sales have changed policies in the last couple years to no longer accept donations in order to reduce the risk of spreading jumping worms. I do not know if there are any jumping worms in my yard at this point, but I want to keep my seedlings off the ground to minimize any risk. Here are examples of two bench types that I am interested in. They both have a UV stable plastic top, with either a wood or metal frame and are supported by either metal legs or cinder blocks (which distribute weight better, but are less attractive). Benches can range in size from 4’x8’ to 4’x12’. I do not know how many I would need at this point since that would depend on how well seeds germinate. (I’m guessing 2-4 to start.) But since I do not want to damage either my lawn or my flower beds, it is my intention to only have benches in areas where grass does not currently grow well, such as under large trees or where ground ivy has taken over the lawn. Because our yard is surrounded by a hedge, the benches should not be highly visible from the road, although I could add screening if necessary to make up for gaps in the hedge. It is my intention to conduct all sales online. In the area behind the house–where I’m currently growing plants–I would like to have a bench or rack where customers could pick up pre-assembled orders. (Since they’d be grown in a tray of 50 rather than a set of smaller, labeled packs, individual plants would need to be “popped out” and put into a tray for the customer.) -Kerri Seemann 1325.02 Accessory Uses. Subd. 1 Accessory Retail Sales, Processing, and Storage. Accessory retail sales shall be permitted in industrial districts, and accessory processing, assembly, repair, and storage of materials shall be permitted in business districts when such uses are directly associated with the principal use, and when such accessory uses are clearly incidental. Subd. 2 Day Care Facilities for Houses of Worship and Schools. Day care facilities for over ten (10) persons shall be considered as accessory uses for houses of worship and schools within all residential districts if located in the principal building. Subd. 3 Home Occupations. Home occupations are allowed as either accessory uses or conditional uses depending on the characteristics of the operation. A. All home occupations shall comply with the following conditions: 1. It shall not result in traffic, parking, noise, light, fumes and odors to such an extent that it is noticeable that the property is being used for non-residential purposes. 2. It shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling. 3. There is no exterior evidence of the home occupation. 4. It does not require any special entrances to the dwelling. B. Class I Accessory Home Occupations. 1. Home Occupations will be permitted as accessory uses if they meet the conditions stipulated in the home occupation definition and following conditions: a) The business is engaged only by the occupants of the premis-es; b) The business activity does not occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling; c) There will be no patrons visiting the premises; d) It requires no delivery of products other than those delivered by private passenger vehicle. 2. Applicants for Class I Accessory Home Occupations shall be required to obtain an Accessory Home Occupation Permit from the City prior to engaging the activity. Review by the Planning Commission and City Council is not required. Application forms as prescribed by the Administrator shall be accompanied by the following information: a) A photograph of the residence; b) A floor plan indicating the floor area to be used by the home occupation along with a tabulation of the total floor area and the floor area to be used for the home occupation; c) A statement describing the home occupation and the compliance with the required conditions; and, d) A copy of the state or county license or permit if such a license or permit is required by the state or county for the proposed home occupation. C. Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupations. 1. Home occupations may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit as regulated in Section 1355.04 Subd 3 if they meet the conditions stipulated above for all Home Occupations and the following conditions: a) The primary business activity shall be conducted by an occupant of the residence; b) One person not residing in the residence may be employed to assist in the business activity; c) It does not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the floor area of the dwelling; d) It has a limited number of patrons visiting the premises; e) Off-street parking for no more than two (2) additional vehicles other than those required by the occupants shall be permitted. On-street parking shall not be used to satisfy required parking; and, f) It requires delivery of products to the premises no more than once per day. 2. Applicants for Class II Conditional Accessory Home Occupations shall follow the procedures prescribed in the Conditional Use Permit section of Appendix A, Procedure Manual. The application shall be accompanied by the information required for Class I Home Occupations in Section 1325.02 above and a site plan showing any additional parking or other modifications to the site required to accommodate the home occupation. A copy of any required State or County license or permit as discussed in Class I Home Occupations shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, however, evidence that the proposed Home Occupation meets all the requirements for State or County licenses or permits shall be submitted with the Conditional Use Permit application. 3. In reviewing applications for Class II Conditional Accessory Use Permits for Home Occupations the City shall consider criteria which affect the appropriateness of a particular use in the location proposed, as discussed in Section 1355.04 Subd 3 and Appendix A, Procedural Manual. Subd. 4 Accessory Outdoor Display and Sales. A. Outdoor display and sales shall only be permitted as an accessory use on a property where the principal use is either Retail Sales and Services or Service Station. B. Outdoor display and sales shall only be permitted in the following Zoning Districts: B-2, B-3, B- 4, NB, and GB. C. An Administrative Permit shall be required from the Community Development Department to allow outdoor display and sales of goods. The Community Development Department shall review a site plan and specifics of the proposed outdoor display and sales area and may issue the permit, subject to, but not limited to, the following requirements: 1. The total display and sales area shall be determined based on the following formula: a. For properties with a principal building of 15,000 square feet or less in size, the permitted display and sales area shall be a maximum of 300 square feet. b. For properties with a principal building greater than 15,000 square feet in size, the permitted display and sales area shall be two percent of the base area of the principal building, but not to exceed 1,000 square feet. 2. Merchandise shall be stacked and/or arranged neatly on a hard surface and may be up to six feet in height. 3. The display and sales area shall be located adjacent to the principal building and on the side of the principal building with the main entrance. No merchandise shall be permitted to be displayed on Service Station islands. 4. The display and sales area shall not obstruct pedestrian access on the site, whether from parking areas to the building entrance or from the public street to the building entrance. 5. The display and sales area shall not occupy or obstruct on-site parking spaces. 6. The type of merchandise displayed shall be limited to items which require an outdoor location, such as plants or fuel, and any items which because of large volume or weight are housed outdoors, such as vending machines, salt, or landscaping materials. 7. Outdoor display and sales areas shall be screened when located within 200 feet of a residentially zoned property. (added 3/28/16) Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM – 1F MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Assisted Hearing Equipment and Council Chambers Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A $25,000 (estimated) 228 – Cable TV Fund For Council Consideration The City Council should consider whether or not to upgrade existing assisted hearing equipment for the Council Chambers. Background The City Council currently has remote packs to assist listeners who need hearing assistance during Council meetings (an example pack will be provided at the meeting). Noises spoken into the microphones are transmitted wirelessly from the AV room to each pack, the user then uses earphones to hear what is being transmitted. Another option for Council to consider is having a loop system installed in the Chambers. This entails new equipment installed in the AV room and a copper wire installed under the carpet. For individuals with hearing aids, when they are in the chambers and if their hearing aid is compatible, they can adjust their hearing aid to wirelessly pick up what is being said into the microphones. This would eliminate the need for the pack and earphones assuming individuals have compatible hearing aids. The City would work with NineNorth to complete this project, they would be in- charge of designing, selecting and installing equipment and/or working with the necessary consultants/vendors. A preliminary number for this system would be around $25,000 (equipment - $7,750, design - $1,000, installation - $5,000, misc. - $6,000, carpet and furniture work - $5,000). The City has requested more finalized numbers, and they will be provided should it become available prior to the work session. If the Council wants to move this forward, Staff will have documents drafted and brought forward at the February meeting for approval; timeline to completion following approval is approximately three to four weeks. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact The 2022 audit has yet to be complete, but the anticipated ending fund balance for 2022 is $60,643, with a projected use of funds of $41,570 for 2023, which would mean an anticipated fund balance of $19,073 at the end of 2023 (this is not taking into account this project). This means that this fund could not support this capital project with out increasing revenues to this fund, cutting expenditures, or a cash infusion. Short-term solutions to fund this project could be: using surplus General Fund balance from 2022 or using a portion of the funds the City made from the sale of the Ridgewood property. This fund, 228 – Cable TV Fund, is primarily supported by franchise and other fees from cable companies, these fees are decreasing as franchise fees decrease due to users moving away from cable and towards streaming services. This fund, regardless of how Council wants to proceed, will be evaluated as part of the annual budget process to determine what, if any, changes need to be made. Attachment Attachment A: 2023 Fund 228 Budget CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Function: General Government 228 Activity:Cable TV 41960 Activity Scope Objectives Issues Budget Commentary 2020 2021 2022 2023 Budget Summary ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Personnel Services 63,373$ 43,687$ 47,570$ 51,220$ Commodities 4,745 -2,500 2,500 Contractual Services 69,241 79,218 78,870 82,350 Capital Outlay ---- Other Charges ---- Total 137,359$ 122,905$ 128,940$ 136,070$ Percent Change (-10.5%)4.9%5.5% Full-Time Equivalent positions 0.64 0.44 0.46 0.44 Expenditures by Classification The 2023 budget has increased overall by 5.5%. 2023 BUDGET Fund # : Activity # : This Special Revenue Fund accounts for revenue and expenditures related to cable TV, internet, and other forms of communication. Revenue for this fund comes primarily from cable owner franchise fees. 1.Completion of the transferring of City files to Laserfiche. 2.Maintaining audio equipment in Council chambers. 1.W orkloads and budget constraints. 2.Maintaining equipment for Council meetings and televising. 38% 2% 60% Personnel Services Commodities Contractual Services Capital Outlay Other Charges Revenues $ 105,063 $ 97,279 $ 98,840 $ 94,500 Page 1 of 4 AGENDA ITEM – 1G MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Pavement Condition Update & Street and Trail Maintenance Plan Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $220,000 TBD General Fund Council Should Consider • Annual presentation from the Public Works Director / City Engineer regarding the current pavement conditions, an overview of the proposed 20-year PMP project cycle, and the proposed 2023 street and trail maintenance plan. • Agreement with the proposed 2023 street and trail maintenance plan. Background/Discussion In 2021, Arden Hills implemented a program that every 3-years Public Works conducts a citywide pavement condition automated survey of all City owned and operated streets. Through this process, each street is surveyed by a consistent method using laser road surface sensors which detect every crack, defect/distress and roughness in the pavement which then a condition rating is calculated ranging from 100 (excellent) to 0 (Poor). Attachment A is the full report from the survey completed in 2021, this information is used to assist in planning pavement rehabilitation and maintenance projects. The City’s overall network PCI in May of 2021 was calculated at 63, the typical PCI that indicates a healthy street network is 70. The next automated survey will be scheduled in 2024. Attachment B shows the PCI of the City streets at the beginning of 2022. Attachment C shows the PCI after the 2022 pavement construction and activities which included the Old Snelling and Arden Oaks pavement rehabilitation projects, the PW In -House Paving and the 2022 Sealcoat Project. After the 2022 construction season, the overall network PCI raised to 71.97. Page 2 of 4 Utilizing the information gathered from the automated survey, field investigations and reviewing historical data, staff is proposing the Citywide PMP Plan (Attachment D) for projects over the next 20-years. The rationale is that each street segment should have some type of pavement rehabilitation project on a 20-year cycle, with routine maintenance activities, that aligns with the typical life cycle of asphalt pavement. Of course, the proposed PMP plan is subject to change during review of the annual CIP/budget process. Below is a list of the next 5 PMP projects along with “desktop” cost estimates. The estimates are based off of past projects with similar elements for both pavement rehab and utility improvements. They are typically funded by the Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) fund, Municipal State Aid (MSA) if applicable, Special Assessments and related utility funds. • 2024 Pavement Management Project – $2,250,000 o Colleen Ave, Collen Cir, James Ave, Norma Ave, Briarknoll Cir, Briarknoll Dr, McClung Dr, Royal Hills Dr, Arden Vista Ct, Keithson Dr. • 2026 Pavement Management Project – $1,700,000 o Karth Lake Neighborhood streets, Cummings Park Dr, Glenhill Rd. • 2028 Pavement Management Project – $1,800,000 o Tiller Ln, Dunlap St N., Cannon Ave, Fernwood St, Benton Way, Walden Pl, Hunters Ct, Pine Tree Dr, Harriet Ave, Carlton Dr, Benton Way, Bussard Ct, Lametti Ln, Lametti Cir. • 2030 Pavement Management Project – $1,600,000 o Red Fox Rd, Grey Fox Rd, Dunlop St. N, Northwoods Dr, Stowe Ave, Hamline Ave N., Connelly Ave • 2032 PMP - $2,800,000 o Chatham Neighborhood, Lake Valentine Rd, Colleen Ct, Snelling Ave N., Keithson Dr, Royal Hills Dr, Arden View Neighborhood, Nursey Hill Neighborhood, Wyncrest Neighborhood In 2005, a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for Traffic Markings, Crack Sealing, Fog Sealing and Seal Coating was executed by the cities of Coon Rapids, Andover, Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, and Fridley. Since 2005, six additional cities have joined the joint powers agreement (Ham Lake, East Bethel, Anoka, Mahtomedi, Circle Pines and Mounds View). On December 11, 2017, the City Council authorized an amendment to the JPA to include the City of Arden Hills. Attachment E shows the proposed 2023 Street Maintenance Plan which includes preservation activities such as seal coat, fog seal, crack seal. Attachment F shows the Public Works In-House paving and large area patching that is scheduled for 2023. Most of this work is covered through the JPA with Coon Rapids but the large area patching is done by our Public Works Maintenance Page 3 of 4 Workers. The benefit to large area patching is it localizes the repair where it is needed and extends the useful life of the existing road that does not require rehabilitation. Attachment G is a map which shows the JPA Coon Rapids street maintenance activities consisting of seal coat, crack seal, and fog sealing scheduled on a 6-year cycle for every street in the City. The streets that are not highlighted are segments that will be included in an upcoming PMP. After this year, our Public Works In-House street maintenance will be scheduled 1 year in advance of the plan shown on Attachment G. This allows for easier scheduling to get the work done throughout the summer months, whereas before, the Public Works In-House work would have to be completed before the end of June which is a strain on our resources. *Years 2024-2027 are projections and may change Through this plan, Arden Hills has reached an overall network PCI of over 70 which indicates the City’s street system is at a healthy state. It is projected the streets could reach an overall network PCI of 76.15 at the end of the 2026 construction season by following the current plan. Budget Impact The proposed PMP projects will be programmed into the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the Public Works Director / City Engineer will work closely with the Finance Director. Staff will be submitting estimated quantities to the Coon Rapids JPA by early February. Once the bids are received, this item will come back to Council for approval which is done typically in March. All elements of the proposed 2023 Street Maintenance plan (Coon Rapids JPA and in- Page 4 of 4 house large area patching) will be covered by the street maintenance operating budget of $220,000. Attachments Attachment A – Automated Pavement Condition Survey Report (2021) Attachment B – 2022 PCI map (January) Attachment C – 2023 PCI map (January) Attachment D – Proposed 20-year PMP projects map Attachment E – Proposed 2023 Street Maintenance map Attachment F – Proposed 2023 PW In-House Paving map Attachment G – Proposed 6-year Street Maintenance cycle Attachment H – PowerPoint presentation City of Arden Hills, MN Pavement Management Report September 2021 IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Project summary 1 Summary of Analysis 1 2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 2 3.0 THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS 4 3.1 IMS Pavement Management Process Overview 4 3.2 Pavement Condition Survey 5 4.0 ARDEN HILLS INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY RESULTS 10 4.1 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK Inventory 10 4.2 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK Condition Imagery 13 4.3 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK Condition Distribution 19 APPENDED REPORTS Following Page 19 Appendix A Street Inventory and Condition Summary Appendix B Full-Sized Maps APPENDED MAPS Functional Classification by Segment Pavement Condition Index by Segment Pavement Condition Rating by Segment Using Descriptive Terms IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT SUMMARY IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LLC (IMS) was contracted by City of Arden Hills to conduct a comprehensive pavement condition assessment and pavement management analysis on approximately 30 miles of Arden Hills roadway network. IMS mobilized their Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) in May 2021 to conduct an objective pavement condition survey following ASTM D6433-11. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS At the time of IMS inspection, t he Arden Hills network had an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 63 with most of the network landing in the 70-85PCI range and a backlog of 13%. Figure 1 presents a network overview of Arden Hills ’s pavement conditions. Figure 1 - Arden Hills Condition Distribution Poor (25 to 40) 13% Marginal (40 to 50) 12% Fair (50 to 60) 21% Good (60 to 70) 12% Very Good (70 to 85) 26% Excellent (85 to 100) 16% City of Arden Hills, MN Network Overview of Pavement Condition (PCI Range, %) Overall Network PCI = 63 Overall Backlog = 13% Est. Total Network Mileage = 30.3 Miles IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 2 2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT The role of the street network as a factor in the citizens’ well-being cannot be overstated. In the simplest of terms, roadways form the economic backbone of a community. They provide the means for goods to be exchanged, commerce to flourish, and commercial enterprises to generate revenue. As such, they are an investment to be maintained. Preservation of existing roads and street systems has become a major activity for all levels of government. Municipalities must consistently optimize and plan for the spending of their budgets ensuring that funds designated to pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) are used as effectively as possible. Municipalities must also identify the optimum level of long-term funding required to sustain the network at a predetermined level of service considering the local conditions and constraints. The best method to obtain the most optimal usage of available funds or to determine the required funding to achieve a predetermined level of service is through the use of a pavement management system. An effective pavement management system can assist agencies in developing long-term rehabilitation programs and budgets, assess the effectiveness of maintenance activities and new technologies, and store historical data and images. Pavement management is the process of planning, budgeting, designing, evaluating, and rehabilitating a pavement network to preserve the existing roadway structure in a serviceable manner. Figure 2 - Pavement Deterioration and Life Cycle Costs Pavement ConditionPavement Age 15% drop in quality in 40% of life 40% drop in quality in 15% of life Inexpensive surface treatment Costly pavement rehabilitation IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 3 As illustrated in Figure 2, typically, pavements start deteriorating rapidly once they hit a specific threshold. A nominal investment in cheaper surface treatments at 40% lifespan is much more effective than deferring maintenance until heavier overlays or possibly reconstruction is required just a few years later. Streets that are repaired while in good condition will have an extended lifetime and will cost less over their lifetime than those left to deteriorate to a poor condition. Without an adequate routine pavement maintenance program, streets will require more frequent reconstruction, thereby costing millions of extra dollars. The goal of the pavement management program is to develop policies and practices to delay the inevitable total reconstruction for as long as practical through application of routine M&R strategies while pavements are within the target zone of cost-effective pavement preservation. That is, as each roadway approaches the steepest part of its deterioration curve, apply a surface treatment that extends the pavement life, at a minimum cost, avoiding costly heavy overlays and reconstruction down the line. The key to a successful pavement management program is to develop a reasonably accurate deterioration curve of the pavements, and then identify the optimal timing and rehabilitation strategy. The outcome of this exercise is the long- term cost savings and increase in network level pavement quality over time. Figure 3 illustrates the concept of extending pavement life through the application of timely M&R activities. A successful pavement management program requires periodic updates in pavement conditions, deterioration models, and cost models, and evaluation of the effectiveness of M&R activities. Figure 3 - Pavement Life Cycle Curve Extended LifeTarget Zone for Pavement Preservation Pavement ConditionPavement Age (Years) Target Zone for Pavement Overlays Target Zone for Pavement Rehabilitation & Reconstruction 10 20 30 90 65 45 IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 4 3.0 THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS 3.1 IMS PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW As shown in Figure 4 below, the IMS Laser Road Surface Tester was mobilized to Arden Hills to conduct an objective survey and to collect pavement imagery, roadway geometry, longitudinal and transverse profile, and surface distress data. The collected pavement imagery, and surface distress data were analyzed following the ASTM D6433 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys for assessment of Pavement Condition Index (PCI). These measurements of pavement quality formed an overall 0 to 100 PCI score, with 100 representing the best and 0 representing the worst pavement conditions. The pavement longitudinal profile data was also analyzed based on ASTM E1926 to assess its roughness through determination of the International Roughness Index (IRI). To ensure the success of the implemented pavement management program, a pavement assessment and analysis should be completed every few years to update the budget models and rehabilitation plans. Figure 4 - Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 5 3.2 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY A specialized piece of survey equipment – referred to as the Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) – was used to collect observations on the condition of the pavement surface, as well as to collect high -definition digital imagery and spatial coordinate information. The RST is equipped with the second edition of 3D Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) and provides a continuous scan of a 13-ft wide lane as shown in Figure 5. All collectors were driven in two directions and local roads were driven in one direction to provide a representative sample of pavement conditions. Figure 5 - RST Equipped with the 3D LCMS-2 Camera The data captured by the RST was analyzed to identify and classify pavement defects and determine pavement condition indices following ASTM D6433 protocols. These following provides a description of major distress types identified in the network. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 6 Alligator Cracking – Quantified by the severity of the failure and number of square feet. As a load associated distress, this distress has a significant impact on the condition score, even at low extents. Wheel Path Rutting – Starting at a minimum depth of ¼ inch, wheel path ruts are quantified by their depth and the number of square feet encountered. Like alligator cracking, low densities of rutting can have a large impact on the final condition score. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracks – Quantified by their length and width. These cracks can be the result of pavement shrinkage, or construction issues. Block Cracking – Quantified by their width and number of square feet, these cracks form by interconnected longitudinal and transverse cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 7 Patching – Quantified by the extent and quality of patches. Even a good quality patch is considered a surface defect and affects the conditions. Raveling – Loss of course aggregate materials on the pavement surface and is measured by the severity and number of square feet affected. Bleeding – the presence of free asphalt on the roadway surface caused by too much asphalt in the pavement or insufficient voids in the matrix. The result is a pavement surface with low skid resistance. This distress is measured by the amount and severity of the area. Edge Cracking – Running parallel to the road and usually within 1 to 2 feet of the outer edge of the pavement, this distress is accelerated by traffic loading and weakened base conditions resulting from poor drainage. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 8 Pothole – Small bowl-shaped depressions in the pavement surface and measured by the severity and the number of occurrences. Distortion – Includes various localized unevenness in the surface of the pavement including bumps and sags, depressions, swell, corrugation or shoving. Load Associated and Non-Load Associated Distress Deducts – Surface distresses may be categorized into two classifications – load associated distresses (LAD) and non-load associated distresses (NLAD). Load associated distresses are those that are directly related to traffic loading and structural capacity including Alligator Cracking, Rutting, Patching, Distortion, Edge Cracking, and Potholes. Non -load associated distresses are those that result from materials or environmental issues and include longitudinal and transverse cracking, bleeding, and raveling. Generally, load associated distresses affect the overall condition score more than non-load associated distresses. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) – Following our field surveys, the cond ition data is imported to an IMS pavement management spreadsheet for calculation of PCI following the ASTM D6433 standard. ASTM D6433 also has algorithms within it to correct for multiple or overlapping distresses within a segment. The 0 to 100 PCI range is commonly divided into various ranges using descriptive terms. Divisions between the terms are not fixed but are meant to reflect common perceptions of pavement conditions. Figure 6 and Table 1 detail a general description for each of these condition ranges with respect to remaining life and typical rehabilitation actions. International Roughness Index (IRI) - The captured longitudinal profile of the road was analyzed following ASTM E1926 to determine the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI values measure the roughness (vertical displacement over a fixed interval reported in inches per mile) of a roadway pavement. • IRI values less than 200 inches/mile indicate “smooth” pavement. • IRI values between 200 and 400 inches/mile indicate a “marginally rough” pavement. • IRI values greater than 400 inches/mile indicate “rough” pavement. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 9 Figure 6 - Understanding the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Score Table 1 - Pavement Condition Ranges PCI Range Description Relative Remaining Life Definition 85 – 100 Good 15 to 25 Years Like new condition – little to no maintenance required when new; routine maintenance such as crack and joint sealing. 70 – 85 Satisfactory 12 to 20 Years Routine maintenance such as patching and crack sealing with surface treatments such as seal coats or slurries. 55 – 70 Fair 10 to 15 Years Heavier surface treatments, chip seals and thin overlays. Localized panel replacements for concrete. 40 – 55 Poor 7 to 12 Years Heavy surface-based inlays or overlays with localized repairs. Moderate to extensive panel replacements. 25 – 40 Very Poor 5 to 10 Years Sections will require very thick overlays, surface replacement, base reconstruction, and possible subgrade stabilization. 10 – 25 Serious 0 to 5 Years High percentage of full reconstruction. 0 – 10 Failed Failed Full reconstruction. Pavement Condition100 85 70 55 40 25 10 Good –Routine and preventative maintenance, some crack and join sealing Satisfactory –Surface Treatments, (Slurry, Micro Surface, Chip Seals) Fair –Surface Treatments with localized repairs and thin overlays Poor –Thin to Moderate overlays with some remove and replace Very Poor –Progressively thicker overlays with more patching and remove and replace Serious –High percentage of full reconstruction/ thick overlays. Failed –Full Reconstruction IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 10 4.0 ARDEN HILLS INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY RESULTS 4.1 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK INVENTORY The GIS file was reviewed to ensure that only the roadways managed by the City are included in the database. The paved roadway network covers approximately 30 miles of Asphalt and Concrete Pavement. As part of the scope of this assignment, the functional classification designations currently used by the City were adopted for their use in the pavement analysis. The City currently consists of only one class, Locals. Although there is no uniform standard for classifying pavement into functional classes, The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), American Public Works Association (APWA) and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) offer some broad guidelines on how to assign classifications that were considered in this study. 1. Local (E) – These are the majority of the street segments typically consisting of all residential roads. Table 2 presents Arden Hills ’s network breakdown between different functional classes and surface ty pe and Figure 7 provides a color-coded map of the functional classes used for the analysis. An electronic version of this map is appended to this report. Appendix A provides detailed inventory and condition data the Arden Hills netowork. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 11 Table 2 - Network Inventory Summary by Functional Class and Surface Type City of Arden Hills, MN Network Summary by Functional Class Pavetype Network Local Segment (Block) Count All Streets 169 169 Asphalt 165 165 Concrete 4 4 Length (ft)All Streets 159,807 159,807 Asphalt 158,882 158,882 Concrete 925 925 Length (mi)All Streets 30.3 30.3 Asphalt 30.1 30.1 Concrete 0.2 0.2 Average Width (ft)All Streets 31 31 Asphalt 31 31 Concrete 19 19 Area (ft2)All Streets 4,916,920 4,916,920 Asphalt 4,899,231 4,899,231 Concrete 17,690 17,690 Pavement Condition Index (PCI)All Streets 63 63 Asphalt 63 63 Concrete 79 79 Backlog (%)All Streets 13 Network Index (NI)All Streets 55 Surface Distress Index (SDI)All Streets 64 64 Asphalt 64 64 Concrete 85 85 Roughness Index (RI)All Streets 62 62 Asphalt 62 62 Concrete 68 68 IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 12 Figure 7 - Arden Hills Pavement Segments IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 13 4.2 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK CONDITION IMAGERY The images presented below provide a sampling of the Arden Hills streets that fall into the various condition categories with a discussion of potential rehabilitation strategies. Poor (PCI = 25 to 40) – Last Opportunity for Surface Base Rehabilitation Norma Avenue from Dawn Circle to Briarknoll Circle (GISID 1165, PCI = 25) – Rated as Poor, this segment still has some remaining life before it becomes a critical reconstruction need. As evident in the imagery, a fair amount of the segment has been patched, but the patched areas are surrounded with alligator cracking. These areas should be dug out and structurally patched to attain the maximum life from any potential rehabilitation efforts. This street is right on the edge of becoming a complete reconstruction project. If left untreated, within a short period of time, a full reconstruction would be required. On arterial roadways, Poor streets often require partial to full reconstruction – that is removal of the pavement surface and base down to the subgrade and rebuilding from there. On local roadways, they require removal of the pavement surface through grinding or excavation, base repairs, restoration of the curb line and drainage, and then placement of a new surface. In general, the service life of Poor streets is such that if deferred for too long, it would require a more costly reconstruction. Streets rated as Poor are typically selected first for rehabilitation as they provide the greatest cost/benefit to the City – that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 14 Marginal (PCI = 40 to 50) – Progressively Thicker Overlays Chatham Court from Chatham Avenue to North END (GISID 1303, PCI = 47) – Marginal streets have distresses that tend to be localized and moderate in nature – that is they do not extend the full length of the segment and can be readily dug out and repaired. This street segment highlights this characteristic as the failed area does not quite extend the full length or width of the roadway and is still serviceable. Rutting and patching, as well as longitudinal and transverse cracking are the primary cause of deterioration on this segment. Marginal streets that display high amounts of load associated distresses are selected as a priority for rehabilitation as they provide the greatest cost/benefit to the City. If left untreated, Marginal streets with high amounts of LADD would deteriorate to become partial reconstruction candidates. Marginal streets that are failing due to materials issues or non-load associated failures may become suitable candidates for thick overlays if deferred, without a significant cost increase. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 15 Fair (PCI = 50 to 60) – Thin to Moderate Overlays Arden View Drive from Royal Hills Drive to Arden Court (GISID 1463, PCI = 58) – Rated in the Fair category, these streets require thin to moderate overlays for asphalt when they enter their need year (generally within 2-3 points of the lower PCI in the defined range). Several distresses are present, but tend to be more localized and moderate in severity, and non -load related (primarily longitudinal and transverse and slight rutting). Asphalt streets rated as Fair tend to receive a lower priority when developing a rehabilitation program. This is because deferring a thin or moderate overlay until a thick overlay represents only a slight increase in rehabilitation costs. The cost of deferral is relatively low when compared to deferring a thick overl ay to a reconstruction with a two to threefold increase in cost. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 16 Good (PCI = 60 to 70) – Surface Treatments to Thin Overlays Nursery Hill Lane from Hamline Avenue to Hamline Avenue North (GISID 1112, PCI = 69) – Rated as Good with the primary cause of deterioration the transverse and longitudinal cracking, as well as patching. It also displays small amounts of load associated distresses that can easily be removed to restore the visual appearance of the roadway. The existing cracks should be sealed and the pavement surface restored, with a heavier surface treatment such as microsurfacing to fully waterproof the pavement and cover the crack sealant. The occasional dig out and replacement may be required to correct localized deficiencies. Alternatively, depending on the extent of the distressed areas, base strength and drainage, a thin overlay may be applied. Asphalt streets rated as Good are ideal candidates for thinner surface-based rehabilitations and local repairs. Depending on the amount of localized failures, a thin edge mill and overlay, or possibly a surface treatment, would be a suitable rehabilitation strategy for streets rated as Good. Streets that fall in the high 60 - low 70 PCI range provide the greatest opportunity for extending pavement life at the lowest possible cost, thus applying the principles of the perpetual life cycle approach to pavement maintenance. The adjacent photo is a great example of a street segment (not a Arden Hills Road) that displayed low LADD and thus, high structural characteristics, and once the distressed areas were replaced, a slurry seal was applied. The patching accounted for less than 5 to 10% of the total area and resulted in a good looking, watertight final surface at a much lower cost than an overlay with less disruption to the neighborhood and curb line. The patches were paver laid and roller compacted. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 17 Very Good (PCI = 70 to 85) – Surface Treatments and Localized Rehabilitation Ridgewood Road from City Limit to Glenhill Road (GISID 1466, PCI = 82) – Rated as Very Good, this road displays minor amounts of transverse cracking. The surface is non-weathered, and the base is still strong. This street is an example of a candidate for preventative maintenance and light weight surface treatments to extend the life of a roadway. Asphalt streets rated as Very Good generally need lightweight surface -based treatments such as surface seals, slurries, chip seals or microsurfacing. Routine maintenance such as crack sealing and localized repairs often precede surface treatments. The conc ept is to keep the cracks as waterproof as possible through crack sealing and the application of a surface treatment. By keeping water out of the base layers, the pavement life is extended without the need for thicker rehabilitations such as overlays or re construction. Surface treatments can increase surface friction and visual appearance of the pavement surface but do not add structure or increase smoothness. Surface treatments may include: • Double or single application of slurry seals (slurries are a sand and asphalt cement mix). • Microsurfacing – asphalt cement and up to 3/8 sand aggregate. • Chip seals and cape seals (Chip seal followed by a slurry). Additional cost benefits of early intervention include: • Less use of non-renewable resources through thinner rehabilitation strategies. • Less intrusive rehabilitation and easier to maintain access during construction. • Easier to maintain existing drainage patterns. IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 18 Excellent (PCI = 85 to 100) Dawn Circle from East END to Norma Avenue (GISID 1164, PCI = 97) – Rated as Excellent, displaying little to no surface distresses. The ride is smooth and the surface is non-weathered and the base is strong. In a couple of years, this street segment would be an ideal candidate for routine maintenance activit ies such as crack sealant rehabilitation. In terms of pavement management efficiency, a program based on worst-first, that is starting at the lowest rated street and working up towards the highest, does not achieve optimal expenditure of money. Generally, under this scenario, agencies can not sufficiently fund pavement rehabilitation and lose ground despite injecting large amounts of capital into the network. The preferred basis of rehabilitation candidate selection is to examine the cost of deferral of a street, against increased life expectancy. c IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 19 4.3 ARDEN HILLS NETWORK CONDITION DISTRIBUTION Figure 8 shows the distribution of pavement condition for the roadway network in Arden Hills. The average PCI for the network is 63. While direct comparisons to other agencies are difficult due to variances in local factors, Arden Hills is within the average when compared to other agencies recently surveyed by IMS, which typically fall in the 60 to 65 range. Figure 8 – Roadway Network Present Status 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 to 10 10 to 20 20 to 30 30 to 40 40 to 50 50 to 60 60 to 70 70 to 80 80 to 90 90 to 100Percentage of Network by AreaPavement Condition Index (PCI) City of Arden Hills, MN Current Network Average Condition = 63, Backlog = 13% Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Distribution by Area IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 20 The following graph (Figure 9) plots the same pavement condition information, but instead of using the actual PCI value, descriptive terms are used to classify the roadways. • Sixteen percent (16%) of the network can be considered in Excellent condition and require only routine maintenance. • Twenty-six percent (26%) of the network falls into the Very Good classification. These are roads that benefit most from preventative maintenance techniques such as microsurfacing, slurry seals and localized panel repairs. • Twelve percent (12%) of the streets are rated as Good and are candidates for lighter surface-based rehabilitations such as thin overlays or slight panel replacements. • Thirty-four percent (34%) of network can be considered Fair to Marginal condition representing candidates for progressively thicker overlay-based rehabilitation or panel replacements. If left untreated, they will decline rapidly into reconstruction candidates. • The remaining thirteen percent (13%) of the network is rated as Poor or Very Poor, meaning these roadways have failed or are past their optimal due point for overlay or surface-based rehabilitation and may require progressively heavier or thicker forms of rehabilitation (such as extensive panel replacement, surface reconstruction or deep patch and paving) or total reconstruction. Figure 9 – Roadway Network Present Status Using Descriptive Terms 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Very Poor (0 to 25)Poor (25 to 40)Marginal (40 to 50)Fair (50 to 60)Good (60 to 70)Very Good (70 to 85)Excellent (85 to 100)Percentage of Network by AreaPavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms City of Arden Hills, MN Current Network Average Condition = 63, Backlog = 13% Pavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 21 Figure 10 and Figure 11 present the surveyed condition of the streets using PCI and Good-Fair-Poor descriptive terms, respectively. Electronic versions of these maps are appended to this report. Figure 10 – Arden Hills by Segment Using Pavement Condition Index (PCI) IMS Infrastructure Management Services Arden Hills Report P a g e | 22 Figure 11 – Arden Hills Pavement Condition by Segment Using Descriptive Terms Appendix A Street Inventory and Condition Summary City of Arden Hills, MN Inventory and Condition Summary Pavement Information & Classification Pavement Condition Summary GISIDStreet NumberBlock NumberStreet PrefixOn Street From Street To Street Pavement Width (ft)Pavement Length (ft)Pavement Area (ft2)Surface Distress Index (SDI)Roughness Index (RI)Structural Index (SI)Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Structural RatingCondition RatingLoad Associated DeductsNon-Load Associated Deducts1121 1000 10 AMBLE CIR AMBLE DR NE END 48 252 12,098 33 46 0 37 Moderate Poor 48 20 1114 1010 10 AMBLE DR KARTH LAKE DR LEXINGTON AVE 31 1,980 61,380 40 43 0 41 Moderate Marginal 42 18 1126 1020 10 AMBLE RD HAMLINE AVE N EAST END 22 1,300 28,600 72 57 0 67 Moderate Good 20 8 1310 1030 10 ARDEN OAKS CT WEST END ARDEN OAKS DR 43 330 14,261 17 47 0 27 Moderate Poor 63 20 1305 1040 10 ARDEN OAKS DR SNELLING AVE N COUNTY ROAD E 30 2,416 72,480 28 43 0 33 Moderate Poor 53 20 1347 1050 10 ARDEN PL SIEMS CT SNELLING AVE N 20 1,466 29,320 70 47 0 62 Moderate Good 14 16 1340 1060 10 ARDEN PL SNELLING AVE N GLENARDEN RD 25 1,273 31,825 89 71 0 83 Moderate Very Good 4 7 1129 1070 10 ARDEN VIEW CT ARDEN VIEW DR SOUTH END 28 920 25,760 68 58 0 65 Moderate Good 18 15 1457 1080 10 ARDEN VIEW DR ROYAL HILLS DR DS@768E ROYAL HILLS DR 30 768 23,040 63 53 0 60 Moderate Fair 25 12 1463 1080 20 ARDEN VIEW DR DS@768E ROYAL HILLS DR ARDEN VIEW CT 28 2,128 59,584 58 58 0 58 Moderate Fair 26 15 1464 1080 30 ARDEN VIEW DR ARDEN VIEW CT HAMLINE AVE N 24 231 5,544 71 48 0 63 Moderate Good 16 13 1122 1090 10 ARDEN VISTA CT ROYAL HILLS DR SE END 35 882 31,042 40 52 0 44 Moderate Marginal 45 15 1465 1100 10 ASBURY AVE N CITY LIMIT GLENHILL RD 26 302 7,852 92 76 0 86 Moderate Excellent 0 8 1429 1100 20 ASBURY AVE N GLENHILL RD EDGEWATER AVE 26 652 16,952 88 70 0 82 Moderate Very Good 0 12 1396 1110 10 BECKMAN AVE NEW BRIGHTON RD LAKE JOHANNA BLVD 30 935 28,050 90 71 0 84 Moderate Very Good 6 4 1367 1120 10 BENTON WAY HARRIET AVE HARRIET AVE 30 2,378 71,340 30 56 0 39 Moderate Poor 48 22 1144 1130 10 BRIARKNOLL CIR SNELLING AVE N NORMA AVE 30 1,471 44,130 42 51 0 45 Moderate Marginal 38 20 1143 1140 10 BRIARKNOLL CIR BRIARKNOLL CIR EAST END 42 267 11,215 40 37 0 39 Strong Poor 36 24 1281 1150 10 BRIGHTON WAY NEW BRIGHTON RD NEW BRIGHTON RD 30 720 21,600 65 50 0 60 Moderate Fair 25 11 1296 1160 10 BRIGHTON WAY EAST END BRIGHTON WAY 46 276 12,680 68 56 0 64 Moderate Good 18 14 1280 1170 10 BRIGHTON WAY NE END BRIGHTON WAY 49 252 12,313 69 58 0 65 Moderate Good 18 12 1167 1180 10 BRUEBERRY LN OLD HIGHWAY 10 PARKSHORE DR 32 640 20,480 98 89 0 95 Moderate Excellent 1 1 1387 1190 10 BUSSARD CT SNELLING AVE N WEST END 36 771 27,543 29 35 0 31 Moderate Poor 52 19 1383 1200 10 CANNON AVE TILLER LN DS@381N TILLER LN 25 381 9,525 67 63 0 66 Moderate Good 18 14 1374 1200 20 CANNON AVE DS@381N TILLER LN DUNLAP ST N 25 481 12,025 69 64 0 67 Moderate Good 19 12 1386 1210 10 CARLTON DR TILLER LN TILLER LN 25 1,516 37,900 72 65 0 69 Moderate Good 18 10 1294 1220 10 CHATHAM AVE COUNTY ROAD E CHATHAM CT 30 2,320 69,600 66 56 0 62 Moderate Good 19 15 1301 1220 20 CHATHAM AVE CHATHAM CT CHATHAM CIR 30 1,077 32,310 53 54 0 53 Moderate Fair 38 9 1299 1220 30 CHATHAM AVE CHATHAM CIR MCCRACKEN LN 30 553 16,590 49 54 0 51 Moderate Fair 38 13 1289 1220 40 CHATHAM AVE MCCRACKEN LN NW END 36 890 32,382 45 50 0 47 Moderate Marginal 35 19 1302 1230 10 CHATHAM CIR SE END CHATHAM AVE 55 180 9,890 75 55 0 69 Moderate Good 11 14 1303 1240 10 CHATHAM CT CHATHAM AVE NORTH END 45 295 13,387 45 51 0 47 Moderate Marginal 37 18 1135 1250 10 COLLEEN AVE HAMLINE AVE N MCCLUNG DR 30 2,439 73,170 33 56 0 41 Moderate Marginal 46 21 1149 1260 10 COLLEEN CIR COLLEEN AVE SOUTH END 44 292 12,755 45 54 0 48 Moderate Marginal 36 19 1134 1270 10 COLLEEN CT COLLEEN AVE EAST END 39 474 18,647 80 61 0 74 Moderate Very Good 11 9 1311 1280 10 CONNELLY AVE COUNTY ROAD E COUNTY ROAD E 34 945 32,130 71 50 0 64 Moderate Good 17 12 1227 1290 10 CRYSTAL AVE FAIRVIEW AVE N LAKE VALENTINE RD 25 1,082 27,050 87 68 0 81 Moderate Very Good 8 5 1389 1300 10 CUMMINGS LN SNELLING AVE N SE END 28 567 15,876 40 34 0 38 Moderate Poor 38 22 1164 1310 10 DAWN CIR EAST END NORMA AVE 41 313 12,768 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1166 1310 20 DAWN CIR NORMA AVE WEST END 43 287 12,351 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1239 1320 10 DELLVIEW AVE GRAMSIE RD CRYSTAL AVE 27 476 12,852 92 76 0 87 Moderate Excellent 5 4 1382 1330 10 DELLWOOD AVE NORTH END TILLER LN 29 219 6,351 29 39 0 32 Moderate Poor 52 20 IMSs Infrastructure Management Services ArdenHillsMN2021_byGISID_ClientReview_Rev1_SW, ACP page 1 of 4 City of Arden Hills, MN Inventory and Condition Summary Pavement Information & Classification Pavement Condition Summary GISIDStreet NumberBlock NumberStreet PrefixOn Street From Street To Street Pavement Width (ft)Pavement Length (ft)Pavement Area (ft2)Surface Distress Index (SDI)Roughness Index (RI)Structural Index (SI)Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Structural RatingCondition RatingLoad Associated DeductsNon-Load Associated Deducts1125 1340 10 DELLWOOD ST AMBLE RD NURSERY HILL CT 31 469 14,539 72 52 0 65 Moderate Good 17 11 1372 1350 10 DUNLAP ST N INGERSON RD NORTH END 28 1,186 33,208 42 46 0 44 Moderate Marginal 40 17 1298 1360 10 DUNLAP ST N GREY FOX RD RED FOX RD 28 1,336 37,408 49 66 0 54 Moderate Fair 27 25 1455 1370 10 EDGEWATER AVE WEST END DS@640E WEST END 38 640 24,344 34 57 0 42 Strong Marginal 19 47 1413 1370 20 EDGEWATER AVE DS@640E WEST END NEW BRIGHTON RD 30 1,176 35,280 21 57 0 33 Moderate Poor 43 36 1417 1380 10 EDGEWATER AVE ASBURY AVE N RIDGEWOOD RD 22 878 19,316 84 65 0 78 Moderate Very Good 5 11 1408 1390 10 EDGEWATER AVE LEXINGTON AVE N LAKE LN N 21 620 13,020 64 40 0 56 Moderate Fair 28 8 1172 1400 10 EIDE CIR HAMLINE AVE N SW END 42 380 15,983 99 90 0 96 Moderate Excellent 0 1 1362 1410 10 FAIRVIEW AVE N NOBLE RD GRANT RD 26 367 9,542 90 70 0 83 Moderate Very Good 4 6 1248 1420 10 FAIRVIEW AVE N VENUS AVE GRAMSIE RD 26 566 14,716 91 72 0 84 Moderate Very Good 6 3 1228 1430 10 FAIRVIEW AVE N GRAMSIE RD LAKE VALENTINE RD 30 1,333 39,990 41 43 0 41 Moderate Marginal 47 12 1400 1440 10 FERNWOOD ST SOUTH END INGERSON RD 30 269 8,202 48 56 0 51 Moderate Fair 43 9 1395 1440 20 FERNWOOD ST INGERSON RD CARLTON DR 26 345 8,970 75 55 0 68 Moderate Good 15 10 1154 1450 10 FERNWOOD ST DS@1250N BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR LEXINGTON AVE 51 1,317 67,167 51 46 0 49 Moderate Marginal 35 14 1187 1460 10 FLORAL DR W HAMLINE AVE N WEST END 33 1,376 45,408 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1355 1470 10 FOREST LN SNELLING AVE N GLENARDEN RD 26 1,114 28,964 80 63 0 75 Moderate Very Good 14 6 1195 1480 10 GALE CIR FLORAL DR W SOUTH END 38 416 15,776 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1163 1490 10 GATEWAY BLVD ROUND LAKE RD W SE END 29 1,537 44,573 88 72 0 83 Moderate Very Good 7 5 1139 1500 10 GATEWAY CT EAST END ROUND LAKE RD W 38 441 16,791 85 66 0 79 Moderate Very Good 7 8 1428 1510 10 GLEN PAUL AVE CLEVELAND AVE N PRIOR AVE N 29 1,340 38,860 28 41 0 32 Moderate Poor 55 17 1423 1510 20 GLEN PAUL AVE PRIOR AVE N NEW BRIGHTON RD 29 1,059 30,711 52 48 0 51 Moderate Fair 31 16 1365 1520 10 GLENARDEN CT GLENARDEN RD SKILES LN 25 760 19,000 87 76 0 84 Moderate Very Good 4 8 1460 1530 10 GLENARDEN RD SNELLING AVE N NORTH END 25 2,586 64,650 91 73 0 85 Moderate Excellent 0 9 1430 1540 10 GLENHILL RD SNELLING AVE N ASBURY AVE N 26 1,012 26,312 92 76 0 86 Moderate Excellent 1 7 1450 1550 10 GLENHILL RD HAMLINE AVE N CITY LIMIT 28 687 19,236 59 45 0 55 Moderate Fair 30 11 1241 1560 10 GLENVIEW AVE FAIRVIEW AVE N CRYSTAL AVE 26 1,882 48,932 91 74 0 86 Moderate Excellent 1 8 1252 1570 10 GLENVIEW CT GLENVIEW AVE SOUTH END 35 656 23,008 91 71 0 84 Moderate Very Good 3 6 1238 1580 10 GRAMSIE RD ROLLING HILLS RD DELLVIEW AVE 26 1,435 37,310 91 74 0 85 Moderate Excellent 3 5 1240 1580 20 GRAMSIE RD DELLVIEW AVE VENUS AVE 30 705 21,150 93 79 0 88 Moderate Excellent 3 4 1360 1590 10 GRANT RD NEW BRIGHTON RD FAIRVIEW AVE N 26 1,206 31,356 90 72 0 84 Moderate Very Good 5 5 1462 1600 10 GREY FOX RD SNELLING AVE N LEXINGTON AVE 34 2,726 92,684 47 63 0 52 Moderate Fair 38 16 1424 1610 10 HAMLINE AVE N HAMLINE AVE N INGERSON RD 26 1,674 43,524 77 81 0 78 Moderate Very Good 14 9 1315 1620 10 HAMLINE AVE N COUNTY ROAD E NORTH END 25 901 22,525 92 76 0 86 Moderate Excellent 4 5 1352 1630 10 HARRIET AVE PINE TREE DR LEXINGTON AVE 37 1,344 49,728 79 59 0 72 Moderate Very Good 12 9 1456 1640 10 HUDSON RD NEW BRIGHTON RD EAST END 22 657 14,454 50 61 0 54 Moderate Fair 36 13 1373 1650 10 HUNTERS CT BENTON WAY SE END 42 431 17,981 68 52 0 63 Moderate Good 22 10 1162 1660 10 INDIAN OAKS CIR HAMLINE AVE N EAST END 51 221 11,230 99 90 0 96 Moderate Excellent 1 0 1151 1670 10 INDIAN OAKS CT JAMES AVE WEST END 31 675 20,880 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1159 1680 10 INDIAN OAKS TRL WEST END HAMLINE AVE N 28 1,187 33,702 94 82 0 90 Moderate Excellent 6 0 1357 1690 10 INDIAN PL COUNTY ROAD E SE END 60 159 9,529 85 67 0 79 Moderate Very Good 3 11 1399 1700 10 INGERSON CT INGERSON RD EAST END 24 480 11,520 85 66 0 78 Moderate Very Good 1 14 1398 1710 10 INGERSON RD HAMLINE AVE N FERNWOOD ST 26 1,658 43,108 72 78 0 74 Moderate Very Good 20 8 1394 1710 20 INGERSON RD FERNWOOD ST LEXINGTON AVE 26 934 24,284 51 54 0 52 Moderate Fair 40 10 1150 1720 10 JAMES AVE INDIAN OAKS TRL COLLEEN AVE 31 648 20,088 68 56 0 64 Moderate Good 19 13 IMSs Infrastructure Management Services ArdenHillsMN2021_byGISID_ClientReview_Rev1_SW, ACP page 2 of 4 City of Arden Hills, MN Inventory and Condition Summary Pavement Information & Classification Pavement Condition Summary GISIDStreet NumberBlock NumberStreet PrefixOn Street From Street To Street Pavement Width (ft)Pavement Length (ft)Pavement Area (ft2)Surface Distress Index (SDI)Roughness Index (RI)Structural Index (SI)Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Structural RatingCondition RatingLoad Associated DeductsNon-Load Associated Deducts1196 1730 10 JAMES CIR FLORAL DR W SE END 30 739 22,210 99 90 0 96 Moderate Excellent 1 0 1199 1740 10 JANET CT LAKE VALENTINE RD NE END 38 777 29,397 81 63 0 75 Moderate Very Good 12 7 1405 1750 10 JERROLD AVE NEW BRIGHTON RD DS@1027W NEW BRIGHTON RD 30 1,027 30,810 25 57 0 35 Moderate Poor 44 31 1454 1750 20 JERROLD AVE DS@1027W NEW BRIGHTON RD WEST END 40 503 20,295 16 46 0 26 Moderate Poor 59 24 1101 1760 10 KARTH LAKE CIR HAMLINE AVE N SE END 37 966 35,874 61 50 0 57 Moderate Fair 19 20 1106 1770 10 KARTH LAKE DR PLEASANT DR WEST END 30 1,630 48,900 52 60 0 54 Moderate Fair 23 25 1391 1780 10 KATIE CT KATIE LN WEST END 39 428 16,574 91 74 0 86 Moderate Excellent 3 6 1390 1790 10 KATIE LN CLEVELAND AVE N KATIE CT 32 1,197 38,304 92 78 0 88 Moderate Excellent 4 4 1468 1790 20 KATIE LN KATIE CT WEST END 26 915 23,790 93 78 0 88 Moderate Excellent 2 6 1459 1800 10 KATIE LN KATIE LN NE END 58 148 8,580 94 83 0 90 Moderate Excellent 4 2 1469 1810 10 KEITHSON DR KEITHSON DR SNELLING AVE N 28 1,398 39,144 84 65 0 78 Moderate Very Good 6 10 1107 1820 10 KEITHSON DR KEITHSON DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W 31 869 26,939 46 49 0 47 Moderate Marginal 41 13 1370 1870 10 LAKE LN LAKE JOHANNA BLVD WEST END 24 1,095 26,280 90 71 0 84 Moderate Very Good 6 4 1407 1890 10 LAKE LN N EDGEWATER AVE NORTH END 26 259 6,751 83 64 0 77 Moderate Very Good 7 10 1214 1900 10 LAKE VALENTINE RD INTERSTATE 35W SNELLING AVE N 40 4,824 192,960 56 59 0 57 Moderate Fair 33 11 1104 1910 10 LAKESHORE PL OLD HIGHWAY 10 OLD HIGHWAY 10 20 621 12,420 97 88 0 94 Moderate Excellent 0 3 1385 1920 10 LAMETTI CIR LAMETTI LN SOUTH END 32 262 8,384 51 43 0 48 Strong Marginal 26 23 1381 1930 10 LAMETTI LN WEST END SNELLING AVE N 38 802 30,156 55 52 0 54 Moderate Fair 26 19 1132 1940 10 MCCLUNG DR SNELLING AVE N COLLEEN AVE 31 618 19,158 35 49 0 40 Moderate Poor 43 22 1288 1950 10 MCCRACKEN LN SNELLING AVE N CHATHAM AVE 30 648 19,440 41 50 0 44 Moderate Marginal 42 17 1293 1950 20 MCCRACKEN LN CHATHAM AVE SW END 41 477 19,661 40 44 0 42 Moderate Marginal 42 18 1364 1960 10 NOBLE RD NEW BRIGHTON RD FAIRVIEW AVE N 25 1,258 31,450 92 78 0 87 Moderate Excellent 3 4 1171 1970 10 NORMA AVE SOUTH END DAWN CIR 39 692 26,786 83 65 0 77 Moderate Very Good 12 4 1165 1970 20 NORMA AVE DAWN CIR BRIARKNOLL CIR 32 318 10,176 19 38 0 25 Moderate Poor 64 17 1157 1980 10 NORMA AVE BRIARKNOLL CIR COLLEEN AVE 32 601 19,232 41 56 0 46 Moderate Marginal 42 17 1191 1990 10 NORMA CIR FLORAL DR W SOUTH END 43 216 9,200 100 90 0 97 Moderate Excellent 0 0 1259 2000 10 NORTHWOODS DR NW END RED FOX RD 42 924 38,808 47 64 0 53 Moderate Fair 36 17 1119 2010 10 NURSERY HILL CT WEST END NURSERY HILL LN 36 665 24,234 75 62 0 71 Moderate Very Good 12 13 1112 2020 10 NURSERY HILL LN HAMLINE AVE N DS@783E HAMLINE AVE N 24 783 18,792 73 62 0 69 Moderate Good 16 11 1118 2020 20 NURSERY HILL LN DS@783E HAMLINE AVE N NURSERY HILL CT 30 460 13,800 73 54 0 67 Moderate Good 15 12 1332 2030 10 OAK AVE LAKE JOHANNA BLVD NW END 26 1,529 39,754 91 74 0 85 Moderate Excellent 4 5 1168 2040 10 PARKSHORE DR WEST END OLD HIGHWAY 10 38 662 25,285 95 85 0 92 Moderate Excellent 4 1 1323 2050 10 PASCAL AVE N COUNTY ROAD E NORTH END 23 401 9,223 58 45 0 53 Strong Fair 21 21 1349 2060 10 PINE TREE DR HARRIET AVE COUNTY ROAD E 40 1,177 47,080 83 65 0 77 Moderate Very Good 11 5 1109 2070 10 PLEASANT CIR WEST END LEXINGTON AVE 37 750 27,739 63 52 0 59 Moderate Fair 19 18 1113 2080 10 PLEASANT DR AMBLE DR DS@582E AMBLE DR 25 582 14,550 56 68 0 60 Moderate Fair 30 15 1110 2080 20 PLEASANT DR DS@582E AMBLE DR PLEASANT CIR 30 327 9,810 55 41 0 51 Moderate Fair 31 13 1105 2080 30 PLEASANT DR PLEASANT CIR NORTH END 37 556 20,812 63 61 0 63 Moderate Good 21 16 1411 2090 10 PRIOR AVE N COUNTY ROAD D W JERROLD AVE 30 1,158 34,740 17 48 0 27 Moderate Poor 61 20 1467 2090 20 PRIOR AVE N JERROLD AVE NORTH END 30 151 4,530 52 62 0 55 Moderate Fair 25 23 1260 2100 10 RED FOX RD LEXINGTON AVE WEST END 32 2,216 70,776 43 67 0 51 Moderate Fair 36 21 1342 2110 10 RIDGEWOOD CT RIDGEWOOD RD SOUTH END 23 732 16,590 43 48 0 45 Moderate Marginal 41 16 1466 2120 10 RIDGEWOOD RD CITY LIMIT GLENHILL RD 28 381 10,668 88 69 0 82 Moderate Very Good 3 9 1416 2120 20 RIDGEWOOD RD GLENHILL RD NORTH END 28 691 19,348 89 70 0 83 Moderate Very Good 4 7 IMSs Infrastructure Management Services ArdenHillsMN2021_byGISID_ClientReview_Rev1_SW, ACP page 3 of 4 City of Arden Hills, MN Inventory and Condition Summary Pavement Information & Classification Pavement Condition Summary GISIDStreet NumberBlock NumberStreet PrefixOn Street From Street To Street Pavement Width (ft)Pavement Length (ft)Pavement Area (ft2)Surface Distress Index (SDI)Roughness Index (RI)Structural Index (SI)Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Structural RatingCondition RatingLoad Associated DeductsNon-Load Associated Deducts1334 2130 10 RIDGEWOOD RD ARDEN PL LAKE JOHANNA BLVD 30 1,408 41,680 52 58 0 54 Moderate Fair 33 15 1249 2140 10 ROLLING HILLS RD GRAMSIE RD VENUS AVE 24 380 9,120 90 71 0 84 Moderate Very Good 6 4 1461 2150 10 ROUND LAKE RD W COUNTY ROAD 96 W DS@1065S COUNTY ROAD 96 W 55 1,065 58,575 78 64 0 73 Moderate Very Good 7 15 1156 2150 20 ROUND LAKE RD W DS@1065S COUNTY ROAD 96 W GATEWAY BLVD 38 2,391 90,858 85 79 0 83 Moderate Very Good 13 2 1120 2160 10 ROYAL HILLS DR SNELLING AVE N ARDEN VIEW DR 36 1,007 35,849 30 53 0 38 Moderate Poor 57 13 1470 2160 20 ROYAL HILLS DR ARDEN VIEW DR KEITHSON DR 28 843 23,604 81 64 0 75 Moderate Very Good 7 12 1173 2170 10 ROYAL LN NORMA AVE FLORAL DR W 30 1,033 30,990 47 60 0 51 Moderate Fair 27 26 1401 2180 10 SANDEEN RD LAKE JOHANNA BLVD LAKE JOHANNA BLVD 25 1,296 32,400 86 68 0 80 Moderate Very Good 3 11 1079 2190 10 SERVICE RD PRIOR AVE SE END 21 1,859 39,039 99 90 0 96 Moderate Excellent 0 1 1433 2200 10 SHORELINE LN COUNTY ROAD D W NORTH END 30 620 18,678 71 49 0 64 Moderate Good 20 9 1418 2210 10 SHORELINE LN SOUTH END EDGEWATER AVE 24 289 6,839 85 67 0 79 Moderate Very Good 3 11 1440 2230 10 SHOREWOOD DR COUNTY ROAD D W NE END 32 1,214 38,845 83 65 0 77 Moderate Very Good 13 4 1350 2240 10 SIEMS CT SOUTH END LAKE JOHANNA BLVD 24 1,728 42,032 64 53 0 60 Moderate Good 27 9 1358 2250 10 SKILES LN GLENARDEN RD SNELLING AVE N 24 949 22,776 83 64 0 77 Moderate Very Good 11 6 1361 2260 10 SKILES LN SNELLING AVE N ARDEN PL 22 921 20,262 65 51 0 61 Moderate Good 21 14 1337 2270 10 SNELLING AVE N SNELLING AVE N COUNTY ROAD E 42 4,392 184,464 15 53 0 28 Moderate Poor 65 20 1341 2280 10 SNELLING AVE N ARDEN PL NORTH END 26 864 22,464 81 70 0 77 Moderate Very Good 9 11 1142 2290 10 SNELLING AVE N BRIARKNOLL CIR MCCLUNG DR 35 475 16,625 76 68 0 74 Moderate Very Good 4 20 1131 2290 20 SNELLING AVE N MCCLUNG DR ROYAL HILLS DR 42 510 21,420 82 82 0 82 Moderate Very Good 11 7 1124 2290 30 SNELLING AVE N ROYAL HILLS DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W 33 1,909 62,997 76 62 0 71 Moderate Very Good 15 10 1375 2300 10 STOWE AVE CLEVELAND AVE N NEW BRIGHTON RD 28 1,318 36,904 46 60 0 51 Moderate Fair 39 15 1378 2310 10 STOWE AVE NEW BRIGHTON RD LAKE JOHANNA BLVD 30 1,334 40,020 40 60 0 47 Moderate Marginal 44 16 1306 2320 10 THOM CT THOM DR EAST END 30 344 10,320 89 70 0 83 Moderate Very Good 5 5 1307 2330 10 THOM DR CLEVELAND AVE N NEW BRIGHTON RD 24 2,214 53,136 78 59 0 72 Moderate Very Good 17 4 1380 2340 10 TILLER LN CANNON AVE LEXINGTON AVE 26 2,641 68,666 52 59 0 55 Moderate Fair 37 11 1211 2350 10 VALENTINE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD SNELLING AVE N 22 1,206 26,532 86 67 0 79 Moderate Very Good 5 10 1194 2360 10 VALENTINE CREST RD VALENTINE AVE NW END 34 870 29,959 85 66 0 78 Moderate Very Good 11 4 1216 2370 10 VALENTINE CT VALENTINE AVE SE END 26 524 13,624 84 65 0 78 Moderate Very Good 11 5 1253 2380 10 VENUS AVE ROLLING HILLS RD GRAMSIE RD 30 1,592 47,760 92 76 0 87 Moderate Excellent 3 5 1371 2390 10 WALDEN PL BENTON WAY SOUTH END 49 216 10,582 74 52 0 67 Moderate Good 12 15 1145 2400 10 WEDGEWOOD CIR OLD HIGHWAY 10 SW END 43 364 15,816 98 89 0 95 Moderate Excellent 0 2 1137 2410 10 WYNCREST CT HAMLINE AVE N WYNRIDGE DR 40 233 9,320 71 50 0 64 Moderate Good 19 11 1133 2410 20 WYNCREST CT WYNRIDGE DR EAST END 34 1,213 40,829 75 65 0 72 Moderate Very Good 13 13 1147 2420 10 WYNCREST LN WYNCREST CT WYNRIDGE DR 30 663 19,890 71 59 0 67 Moderate Good 17 13 1146 2430 10 WYNRIDGE DR WYNCREST CT EAST END 30 1,378 41,340 70 59 0 67 Moderate Good 17 13 IMSs Infrastructure Management Services ArdenHillsMN2021_byGISID_ClientReview_Rev1_SW, ACP page 4 of 4 Appendix B Full-Size Maps UV88 UV49UV51 UV51 UV96 ¡¢10 §¨¦694 §¨¦694 §¨¦35W Snail Lake Rice Cre e k CoDitch101Owasso Lake Long Lake Rush Lake BrightwoodHills GCPonds Pike Lake Silver ViewPark Lake Long LakeParkPond Arden ManorPark Pond VeteransPark Pond Rice Creek ShamrockPark Pond Turtle Lake Charley Lake Round Lake KarthLake SunfishLake WilsonPark Pond McCulloughPark Ponds ShoreviewCommomsPark Pond Snail Lake Langton Lake DriftwoodPark Pond Lake JonesPoplar Lake HansenPark Ponds Silver Lake Lake Johanna LakeJosephine Island Lake ValentineLake LittleJohannaLake Lake Judy Lake JosephinePark Ponds Lake JudyPark Pond Island LakeCountyPark Ponds Tony SchmidtPark Ponds Snail LakeReg Park Pond LakeShoreview ValleyPark Pond Grass Lake Lake Wabasso Pleasant Lake BNRailroadMTRRailroadMt RailroadS o o L i n e R a il r o a d FERNWOODLAKEJOHANNAEDGRENLOCKBOXCOU N TY R OA D 96 LEXINGTONHAMLINEA B E L E TODDBANYANSB I35W TOCORDI WC O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 NELSONLOCKBOXC OUNT Y ROAD D HI G HW AY PRIORI N D I A N WALDENW Y NCRE ST COUNT Y ROAD E DAWNSB I35W TOCORDH WASBURYNORMAPLEASANTINTERSTATE 35WW EDGEW OODNEW BRIGHTONROLLINGHILLSE I DE CANNO N OLD HIG H W AY 10 PASCALGALEHUNTERS SHORELINECLEVELANDNURSERY HILL DELLWOODDELLVIEWJERROL D PA U LKIRKWO LD C OUNT Y ROAD F LAKEVIE WCORDI W TOSB I35WCUM MIN GS COU N TY R O A D I LISAM C C L U N G LAKESHORE EDGEWAT ER BRUEBER R Y M CCRACKENHUD SO N PARKSHORE CORDE TO NBSNELLING AVE NBRIGHTONJAMESSNELLI NGARDE N V I E W BUSSA RD JANET CORDE2WTONBI 35WLA ME T T I R O Y A L H I L L S DRKEITHSONVALENTINECREST ARDENVISTACHATHAM NORTHWOODSI N G E R S O N B E CKMAN CONNELLYS K I LESCORDIWTONBI35WROYAL H I L L S GLENHILL R OYA LCORDHWTONBI 3 5 WSNELLINGAVENTOCORDEGLEN PAULROUND LAKEC R Y S T A L LAKE C O R D E T O S B S NELLIN G A V E N F O REST LEXINGTON AVE TO WB I694 NB I35W TO CORDE2 WINTERSTATE694 PINE TREEE B I694TONBI35W INDIAN OA K S KATIEV A L E NTINE GRANT SHOREWOODEBI694TOLEXINGTONAVENBI35WTOWBI694 NOBLE SANDEEN STO WE FAI RVI EWDUNLAPHARRIE T F LOR AL WYNRIDGENBI35WTOEBHWY96WEB HWY9 6 W TO NB I 3 5 WWBI694TONB SNELLINGAVEN KEITHSON D R RIDGEWOODGRAMSIE ARDEN BRIARKNOLL CARLTONNB HWY10 NE TO NB I 35WO A K GATEWAY VENUS KARTH L A K ENB I35W TO CORD10PARK N RIDE SERVICEE B I6 9 4 T O S B S N E L LI N G A V E N SIEMSNBI35WTOCORDIWSERVICE NBI35WTOEBI694GLENV I E W B E T H E L WB I694 TO NB I35W AMBLE THOMR E D FOX BENTON A RD E N O A K S C O L LEEN GLENARDENHIGH W AY 10 TIL LEROLD HIGHWAY 8GREY FOX LAKE VALENTINE Pavement Analysis Legend Functional Classification Local City LimitsN00.5 10.25 Miles IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2021 ARDEN HILLS, MN | Pavement Analysis 2021 city of M I N N E S O T A Functional Classificationby Segment UV88 UV49UV51 UV51 UV96 ¡¢10 §¨¦694 §¨¦694 §¨¦35W Snail Lake Rice Cre e k CoDitch101Owasso Lake Long Lake Rush Lake BrightwoodHills GCPonds Pike Lake Silver ViewPark Lake Long LakeParkPond Arden ManorPark Pond VeteransPark Pond Rice Creek ShamrockPark Pond Turtle Lake Charley Lake Round Lake KarthLake SunfishLake WilsonPark Pond McCulloughPark Ponds ShoreviewCommomsPark Pond Snail Lake Langton Lake DriftwoodPark Pond Lake JonesPoplar Lake HansenPark Ponds Silver Lake Lake Johanna LakeJosephine Island Lake ValentineLake LittleJohannaLake Lake Judy Lake JosephinePark Ponds Lake JudyPark Pond Island LakeCountyPark Ponds Tony SchmidtPark Ponds Snail LakeReg Park Pond LakeShoreview ValleyPark Pond Grass Lake Lake Wabasso Pleasant Lake BNRailroadMTRRailroadMt RailroadS o o L i n e R a il r o a d FERNWOODLAKEJOHANNAEDGRENLOCKBOXCOU N TY R OA D 96 LEXINGTONHAMLINEA B E L E TODDBANYANSB I35W TOCORDI WC O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 NELSONLOCKBOXC OUNT Y ROAD D HI G HW AY I N D I A N WALDENCOUNT Y ROAD ESB I35W TOCORDH WD A W NINTERSTATE 35WW EDGEW OODNEW BRIGHTONROLLINGHILLSE I DE OLD HIG H W AY 10 PASCALGALEHUNTERS SHORELINECLEVELANDDELLWOODDELLVIEWCANNO N PA U LKIRKWO LD C OUNT Y ROAD F LAKEVIE WCORDI W TOSB I35WCUM MIN GS COU N TY R O A D I PLEASANTLISAM C C L U N G LAKESHORE M CCRACKENASBURYHUDSON PA R KSHOR E NURSERY HILL NORMAGRAMSIE CORDE TO NBSNELLING AVE NBRIGHTONJAMESSNELLI NGBUSSARDJANETCORDE2WTONBI35WLAME T T I R O Y A L H I L L S DRKEITHSONVALENTINECREST ARDENVISTAN O RTHWOODS BECKM ANCONNELLYS K I LE SCORDIWTONBI35WROYAL H I L L S G L E N H IL L J E R R O LD RO YA LCORDHWTONBI 3 5 WSNELLINGAVENTOCORDEC R Y S T A L LAKE C O R D E T O S B S NELLIN G A V E N F O REST LEXINGTON AVE TO WB I694 NB I35W TO CORDE2 WINTERSTATE694 PRIOREDGEWAT ER PINE TREEE B I694TONBI35W INDIAN OAK S KATIEV A L E NTINE GRANT WY N CRE S T SHOREWOODEBI694TOLEXINGTONAVENBI35WTOWBI694 NOBLE SANDEENFAIRVIEWSTOWE DUNLAPGL E N PAUL HARRIET FLORAL WYNRIDGENBI35WTOEBHWY96WEB HWY9 6 W TO NB I 3 5 WWBI694TONB SNELLINGAVEN K EITHSON DR RIDGEWOODARDEN BRIARKNOLL C A R LTONNB HWY10 NE TO NB I 35WO A K GATEWAY VENUS KA RTH L A K ENB I35W TO CORD10PARK N RIDE SERVICEE B I6 9 4 T O S B S N E L LI N G A V E N INGERSONSIEMSNBI35WTOCORDIWSERVICENBI35WTOEBI694GLENVIEW B E T H E L WB I694 TO NB I35W AMBLE A R D E N V I E W THOMR E D FOX CHATHAMBENTONROUND LAKEA RD E N O A K S C O L LEEN GLENARDENHIGH W AY 10 TIL LEROLD HIGHWAY 8GREY FOX LAKE VALENTINE 145914671 3 5 7 14721302 14581371119113821162 1 3 0 6 14641137 128011211407138511 43 140014151296 1471 1166 1418114913031465116 41165 11101 3 1 0 139511 4 5 136212491172 14661383132311951 39 1 1373 1139 14331118 112511341142123912931399 1 3 74 145411311 2 1 6 1299110512481389 1113 115711 32 1408 1104 1455 11671288115014291252 14 56 1147 1168 1119 115 1 145014161171124012811342 11961109 136514 57 1387 1199 1 1 1 2 1 3 8 1 1 4 7 0 1 3 4 111071194 141711221289 13151468 1129136112591 394 1396 1311 13 5 8 110111 20 1430 1 40 5 1173 1 423 1 4611301 1 2 2 7 13 70 135514111 41 3 13491372115 9 13 90 1211 1360 11 33 14401364 13401401 112 6 115 4 1 375 122813 78 12981 4 2 8 1352 118 7 1146 14 69 13341238 13471144 138 6 1 3 3 2 1163 1253 110 6 1398 142413501079 1241 11241114 1463 1 3 0 7 12 60 1294136711561305 11 35 146013801462 1 3 3 7 1214 Pavement Analysis Legend PCI 0-10 red 11-20 21-30 31 - 40 41 - 50 yellow 51 - 60 61 - 70 71 - 80 81 - 90 91 - 100 green City LimitsN00.5 10.25 Miles IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2021 ARDEN HILLS, MN | Pavement Analysis 2021 Label Legend 12341234 GISIDProject ID (when applicable) city of M I N N E S O T A Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Current PCI by Segment UV88 UV49UV51 UV51 UV96 ¡¢10 §¨¦694 §¨¦694 §¨¦35W Snail Lake Rice Cre e k CoDitch101Owasso Lake Long Lake Rush Lake BrightwoodHills GCPonds Pike Lake Silver ViewPark Lake Long LakeParkPond Arden ManorPark Pond VeteransPark Pond Rice Creek ShamrockPark Pond Turtle Lake Charley Lake Round Lake KarthLake SunfishLake WilsonPark Pond McCulloughPark Ponds ShoreviewCommomsPark Pond Snail Lake Langton Lake DriftwoodPark Pond Lake JonesPoplar Lake HansenPark Ponds Silver Lake Lake Johanna LakeJosephine Island Lake ValentineLake LittleJohannaLake Lake Judy Lake JosephinePark Ponds Lake JudyPark Pond Island LakeCountyPark Ponds Tony SchmidtPark Ponds Snail LakeReg Park Pond LakeShoreview ValleyPark Pond Grass Lake Lake Wabasso Pleasant Lake BNRailroadMTRRailroadMt RailroadS o o L i n e R a il r o a d FERNWOODLAKEJOHANNAEDGRENLOCKBOXCOU N TY R OA D 96 LEXINGTONHAMLINEA B E L E TODDBANYANSB I35W TOCORDI WC O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 NELSONLOCKBOXC OUNT Y ROAD D HI G HW AY I N D I A N WALDENCOUNT Y ROAD ESB I35W TOCORDH WD A W NINTERSTATE 35WW EDGEW OODNEW BRIGHTONROLLINGHILLSE I DE OLD HIG H W AY 10 PASCALGALEHUNTERS SHORELINECLEVELANDDELLWOODDELLVIEWCANNO N PA U LKIRKWO LD C OUNT Y ROAD F LAKEVIE WCORDI W TOSB I35WCUM MIN GS COU N TY R O A D I PLEASANTLISAM C C L U N G LAKESHORE M CCRACKENASBURYHUDSON PA R KSHOR E NURSERY HILL NORMAGRAMSIE CORDE TO NBSNELLING AVE NBRIGHTONJAMESSNELLI NGBUSSARDJANETCORDE2WTONBI35WLAME T T I R O Y A L H I L L S DRKEITHSONVALENTINECREST ARDENVISTAN O RTHWOODS BECKM ANCONNELLYS K I LE SCORDIWTONBI35WROYAL H I L L S G L E N H IL L J E R R O LD RO YA LCORDHWTONBI 3 5 WSNELLINGAVENTOCORDEC R Y S T A L LAKE C O R D E T O S B S NELLIN G A V E N F O REST LEXINGTON AVE TO WB I694 NB I35W TO CORDE2 WINTERSTATE694 PRIOREDGEWAT ER PINE TREEE B I694TONBI35W INDIAN OAK S KATIEV A L E NTINE GRANT WY N CRE S T SHOREWOODEBI694TOLEXINGTONAVENBI35WTOWBI694 NOBLE SANDEENFAIRVIEWSTOWE DUNLAPGL E N PAUL HARRIET FLORAL WYNRIDGENBI35WTOEBHWY96WEB HWY9 6 W TO NB I 3 5 WWBI694TONB SNELLINGAVEN K EITHSON DR RIDGEWOODARDEN BRIARKNOLL C A R LTONNB HWY10 NE TO NB I 35WO A K GATEWAY VENUS KA RTH L A K ENB I35W TO CORD10PARK N RIDE SERVICEE B I6 9 4 T O S B S N E L LI N G A V E N INGERSONSIEMSNBI35WTOCORDIWSERVICENBI35WTOEBI694GLENVIEW B E T H E L WB I694 TO NB I35W AMBLE A R D E N V I E W THOMR E D FOX CHATHAMBENTONROUND LAKEA RD E N O A K S C O L LEEN GLENARDENHIGH W AY 10 TIL LEROLD HIGHWAY 8GREY FOX LAKE VALENTINE 145914671 3 5 7 14721302 14581371119113821162 1 3 0 6 14641137 128011211407138511 43 140014151296 1471 1166 1418114913031465116 41165 11101 3 1 0 139511 4 5 136212491172 14661383132311951 39 1 1373 1139 14331118 112511341142123912931399 1 3 74 145411311 2 1 6 1299110512481389 1113 115711 32 1408 1104 1455 11671288115014291252 14 56 1147 1168 1119 115 1 145014161171124012811342 11961109 136514 57 1387 1199 1 1 1 2 1 3 8 1 1 4 7 0 1 3 4 111071194 141711221289 13151468 1129136112591 394 1396 1311 13 5 8 110111 20 1430 1 40 5 1173 1 423 1 4611301 1 2 2 7 13 70 135514111 41 3 13491372115 9 13 90 1211 1360 11 33 14401364 13401401 112 6 115 4 1 375 122813 78 12981 4 2 8 1352 118 7 1146 14 69 13341238 13471144 138 6 1 3 3 2 1163 1253 110 6 1398 142413501079 1241 11241114 1463 1 3 0 7 12 60 1294136711561305 11 35 146013801462 1 3 3 7 1214 Pavement Analysis Legend Descriptive Pavement Condition 0-25 Very Poor 26 - 40 Poor 41-50 Marginal 51 - 60 Fair 61 - 70 Good 71 - 85 Very Good 86 - 100 Excellent City LimitsN00.5 10.25 Miles IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2021 ARDEN HILLS, MN | Pavement Analysis 2021 Label Legend 12341234 GISIDProject ID (when applicable) city of M I N N E S O T A Pavement Condition (Descriptive GFP)by Segment STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RED FOX RD GREY FOX RD INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLEE N AVE GLEN PAUL AVE TILLER LN HAMLINEVENUS AVE T H O M D R ARDE N VIEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAMB LE RD NOBL E RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE EDGEWATER AVE JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GLE NV IEW AVE KARTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY S TA L A V E PLEASANT DRA R D E N OA K S DR V A LE N T IN E A V E BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL SKILESLNBRIAR BECKMAN AVE LAM E TTI LN M C CR A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAW N CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONGLENHILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMCCLUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SAN DEEN RD PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MIN GS LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O L L E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CT SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NG L E N H I L L R D WYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN INDIAN OAKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIR INDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNK A TIE LN COUNTY ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR LAKE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A B LVD GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN E W B R I G H T ON R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NBETHEL DROLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 WTODD DR (Private)TODD DR (Private) PRIOR AV E N ( P ri vate)LISA LN (Private)LISA CT (Private)LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAW N CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) B E T H E L D R BETHEL DR COUNTY ROAD E W LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEIT HSON DR AL HILLS DRTony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark FreewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark CummingsPark Arden ManorPark JohannaMarsh Arden OaksPark CommunityGardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake 66956481246281100734177 6 5 100 815059 94 100 4392 100821 0 0 3074527 4 767 7 4646 8588 6451 83516376 5 6 37 85 5072 10 0 83 48100764395 87787683 71 87 8279 66 50 10046 537166100 7 7 68 84 77 44 68 8982 52 7773758570 40 57 7149 6 1 38 32 40 845 4 50 2756 2022 Pavement Condition Ratings 0 1,000Feet Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Engineering\Infrastructure Condition\Streets\Pavement Condition Ratings - Master.mxd80 - 100 60 - 79 40 - 59 20 - 39 STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RE D FOX RD GREY FOX RD INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLE EN AVE GLEN PAUL AVE TILLE R LN HAMLINEVENUS AVE T H O M D R ARDE N V IEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAMB LE RD NOBLE RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE EDGEWATER AVE JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GL EN VIEW AVE KARTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY S TAL A V E PLEASANT DRA R D EN OA K S DR V A LE N T IN E A V E BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL SKILESLNBRIAR BECKMAN AVE LAM E TTI LN M C CR A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONGLENHILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMCCLUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SA NDEEN RD PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MINGS LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O L L E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CT SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NG L E N H I L L R D WYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN INDIAN OAKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIR INDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNK A TIE LN COUNTY ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR LAKE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A BLV D GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN E W B R I GH T ON R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NOLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAWN CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) COUNTY ROAD E W LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR AL HILLS DRTony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark FreewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark CummingsPark Arden ManorPark JohannaMarsh Arden OaksPark CommunityGardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake 811007952 65602053799910081666289 7 6 100 757255 92 100 6681 89 9980731002570439 0 737 4 4138 6 9 8085 827 2 42 7762 5 8 73 5 1 3 2 83 4569 1 0 0 73 7 7 81 44100695893 82756981 86 84 8073 80 46 9969 496481100 9 5 65 82 74 38 87 8580 43 8985728362 35 75 64 40 7 9 45 100 35 827641 10067 202 3 Pav ement Condition Ratings 0 1,000Feet Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Engineering\Infrastructure Condition\Streets\Pavement Condition Ratings\Pavement Condition Ratings - Master.mxd80 - 100 60 - 79 40 - 59 20 - 39 STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RE D FO X RD GREY FOX RD ING E RS ON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCO LL E EN AVE GL EN PAUL AVE TIL LE R LN HAMLINEVENUS AVE T H O M D R AR DE N V IEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAM B LE RD NO BL E RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE EDGEWATER AVE JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GL EN V IEW AVE KA RTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY S TAL AVE PLEASANT DRAR DE N OA KS DRVALENTINEAVE BENTON WAYIND IA N O AKS TRL SKILESLN B RI A R BECKMAN AVE LA ME T TI LN M C C R A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONGLENHILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMC C LUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SAND EEN RD PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MINGS LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O LL E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CT SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NG L E N H I L L R D WYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN IND IA N O AKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIRPRIOR AVEINDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNK A TIE LN CO UN T Y ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR LA KE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A B LV D GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN E W B R I G H T O N R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NOLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAWN CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR CO UN T Y R O AD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) COUNTY ROAD E W LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR AL HILLS DRTony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark Fr eewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark Cum mingsPark Arden ManorPark JohannaMarsh Arden OaksPark Comm unityGardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake Proposed PMP Projects 0 1,000Feet Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Engineering\City Projects\2023\Proposed PMP Projects (2023).mxdYear 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 Tony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark FreewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark CummingsPark Arden ManorPark JohannaMarsh Arden OaksPark CommunityGardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RED FOX RD GREY FOX RD INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLE EN AVE GLEN PAUL AVE TILLE R LN HAMLINEVENUS AVE T H O M D R ARDEN VIEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAMBLE RD NOBLE RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE EDGEWATER AVE JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GLEN VIEW AVE KARTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY S TAL A V E PLEASANT DRA R D EN OA K S DR V A LE N T IN E A V E BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL SKILESLNBRIAR BECKMAN AVE LA M ETTI LN M C CR A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONGLENHILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMCCLUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SAN D EEN R D PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MIN GS LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O L L E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CT SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NG L E N H I L L R D WYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN IN DIAN OAKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIR INDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNK A TIE LN COUNTY ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR LAKE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A B LVD GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN E W B R I GH T ON R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NOLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAWN CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) COUNTY ROAD E W LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR AL HILLS DR202 3 - JPA Street Maintenance Plan 0 1,000FeetÜ Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-23-0103 Street Maintenance 2023\02 design\JPA Street Maintenance - 2023.mxdCrac k Seal Seal Coat & Crack Seal Fog Seal Cul-de-sac Fog and Crack Seal Path Parking Lot Seal Coat STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RED FOX RD GREY FOX RD INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLEEN AVE TIL LER LN VENUS AVE T H O M D R ARDEN VIEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAMBLE RD NOBLE RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GL ENVIEW AVE KARTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY STA L AVE PLEASANT DRA R D EN OA KS DR V A LE N T IN E A V E BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL SKILESLNBRIAR BECKMAN AVE LAME TTI LN M C C R A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMCCLUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SANDEEN RD PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MIN G S LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O L L E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CTPASCAL AVE NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L NORMAAVETILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVIEW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NWYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN INDIAN OAKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIRPRIOR AVEINDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NK A TIE LN LAKE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A BLVD N E W B R I G H T ON R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NOLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAWN CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) COUNTY ROAD E W BENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR AL HILLS DRTony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark FreewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark CummingsPark Arden ManorPark Arden OaksPark CommunityGardens Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake 2023 Public Works In-House Paving 0 1,600Feet Ü Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Numbered Projects\PW-23-0103 Street Maintenance 2023\02 design\Public Works Paving - 2023.mxdYear 2023 2023 / 2024 Dependent on Lexington AvenueReconstruct Project Schedule Trail Paving and RepairsTrail Paving and RepairsTrail Paving and RepairsTrail Paving and Repairs Water Tower Service DriveWater Tower Service Drive Lift Station Service Drive Tony SchmidtRegional Park Crepeau NaturePreserve HazelnutPark IngersonPark FreewayPark Tony SchmidtRegional Park SampsonPark Lindey's Park CharlesPerry Park Tony SchmidtRegional Park ValentinePark FloralPark Royal HillsPark CummingsPark Arden ManorPark JohannaMarsh Arden OaksPark CommunityGardens Lake Josephine Lake Johanna ValentineLake RoundLake Karth LakeSun FishLake STOWE AVE LAKE VALENTINE RD RED FOX RD GREY FOX RD INGERSON RDROUND LAKE RD WA M B L E D R SIEMS CTSNELLING AVE NCOLLEEN AVE GLEN PAUL AVE TILLER LN HAMLINEVENUS AVE T H O M D R ARDEN VIEW DR GLENARDEN RDCHATHAM AVEAMBLE RD NOBLE RD GRAMSIE RD ARDEN PL GRANT RD OAK AVE EDGEWATER AVE JERROLD AVE DUNLAP ST NHARRIET AVE FLORAL DR W GL ENVIEW AVE KARTH LAKE DR GATEWAY BLVD W YNCRESTCARLTON DRFOREST LNPRIOR AVE NCUMMINGS PARK DR ROYAL LN KATIE LN PINE TREE DRFAIRVIEW AVE NRIDGEWOOD RDCRY STA L AVE PLEASANT DRA R D EN O AK S DR V A LE N T IN E A V E BENTON WAYINDIAN OAKS TRL SKILESLNBRIAR BECKMAN AVE LA ME TTI LN M C C R A C K EN LN KEITHSON DRASBURY AVE NNURSERY HILL LN BUSSARD CT DAWN CIR W JAMES AVEJANET CT CANNONGLENH ILL RDNORMA AVEARDENVIEWCTR O Y KATIE CT G L ENARDENCTRIDGEWOOD CTKARTH LAKE CI RGALE CIRMCCLUNG DR WY N C R E S T L N SANDEEN RD PARKSHORE DR EIDE CIR NORTH-WOODS DRNURSERY HILL CT CU M MIN G S LN V A L E N T I N E C T INGERSON CT C O L L E E N C T GLENVIEW CT HUNTERS CT SHORELINELNPASCAL AVE NLAKE LN NCONNELLY AVE T H O M C T AMBLE CIRCHATHAM CTCOLLEEN CIRROLLING HILLS RDARDEN OAKS CTNORMA CIRI N D I A N P L EDGEWATER AVENORMAAVE TILLER LNSNELLING AVE NDUNLAP ST NARDENPLSKILES LNFAIRVI EW AVE NHAMLINE AVE NG L E N H I L L R D WYNRIDGE PLEASANT CIR ARDEN INDIAN OAKS CT JAMES CIRDELLVIEW AVEDELLVIEW AVEDELLWOOD STGATEWAY CT VALENTINE CREST RD BRUEBERR Y LN BRIARKNOLL CIR DELLWOOD AVELAMETTI CIRWALDEN PLWEDGEWOODCIRPRIOR AVEINDIAN OAKS CIR CHATHAM CIR L A K E JO H ANNABLVDLAKE JOHANNA BLVDRIDGEEDGEWATER AVEFAIRVIEW AVE NFERNWOOD STSNELLING AVE NSHORELINELNK A TIE LN COUNTY ROAD D W SHOREWOODDR LAKE LN COUNTY ROAD E W LAKEJOHAN N A BLVD GLEN PAUL AVECLEVELAND AVE NN E W B R I G H T ON R DNEW BRIGHTON RDHUDSON RDTHOM DRCLEVELAND AVE NBRIGHTON WAYNEW BRIGHTON RDINTERSTATE 35WCOUNTY ROAD E2 W C O U N T Y R O A D E 2 WLAKEVIEWCT C H A TH A M A V E SIEMS CTARDEN PL GLE N ARDENRDOLD SNELLI NGARDEN OAKS DRSNELLING AVE NOLD HIGHWAY 10OLD SNELLINGVENUS AVEINTERSTATE 35WLAKE VALENTINE RDINTERSTATE 35WROUNDLAKERDWOLD HIG H W AY 10 LAKESHORE PL INTERSTATE 694 INTERSTATE 694 HIG H W AY 10 COUNTY ROAD 96 W COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NKNOLL DR VISTA CTDAWN CIR E COLLEEN A V E ARDENVI EW DR COUNTY ROAD F W INNOVATION WAY (Private)FERNWOOD STPLEASANT DR AMBLE DR COUNTY ROAD 96 W LEXINGTON AVE NLEXINGTON AVE NDRCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DR (Private) COUNTY ROAD E W LEXINGTON AVE NBENTON WAYAVE INGERSON RD AVE NWOOD RDCOUNTY ROAD E HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NPrivateKATIE LNKEITHSON DR AL HILLS DR6-Y ear Street Maintenance Cycle 0 1,000FeetÜ Document Path: P:\PR&PW\Engineering\Infrastructure Condition\Streets\Street Maintenance 6-year Cycle Plan - Master.mxd20 23 20 24 20 25 20 26 20 27 20 28 Arden Hills Pavement Update Topics IMS Survey Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Proposed 20-year Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Proposed Maintenance Plan -2023 Questions IMS Automated Survey •Approximately 30 Miles of Roads •Approximately 560,000 Square Yards of Roads •Automated Survey provides consistent results •Laser Road Surface Testing •3-year cycle •ICON pavement management software •Pavement Management Goals ◦Preserve and rehabilitate roadways so that the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is above 70 Attachment A Average PCI –68.75 Average PCI –71.97 Attachment B & C Pavement Preservation and Rehabilitation Treat Roadways and trails “Early & Often” –Target Overall PCI of above 70 Preservation methods -(PCI 65-100) –6-year cycle ◦Crack Seal ◦Seal Coat ◦Fog Seal ◦Large area patching Rehabilitation methods -(PCI 45-65) –Pavement cores ◦Mill & Overlay ◦Reclaim & Overlay Complete Reconstruction -(End of useful life) Proposed PMP Projects 2024 Pavement Management Project –$2,250,000 ◦Colleen Ave, Collen Cir, James Ave, Norma Ave, Briarknoll Cir, Briarknoll Dr, McClung Dr, Royal Hills Dr, Arden Vista Ct, Keithson Dr 2026 Pavement Management Project –$1,700,000 ◦Karth Lake Neighborhood streets, Cummings Park Dr, and Glenhill Rd 2028 Pavement Management Project –$1,800,000 ◦Tiller Ln, Dunlap St N., Cannon Ave, Fernwood St, Benton Way, Walden Pl, Hunters Ct, Pine Tree Dr, Harriet Ave, Carlton Dr, Benton Way, Bussard Ct, Lametti Ln, Lametti Cir. 2030 Pavement Management Project –$1,600,000 ◦Red Fox Rd, Grey Fox Rd, Dunlop St. N, Northwoods Dr, Hamline Ave N., Connelly Ave, Stowe Ave 2032 Pavement Management Project –$2,800,000 ◦Chatham Neighborhood, Lake Valentine Rd, Colleen Ct, Snelling Ave N., KeithsonDr, Royal Hills Dr, Arden View Neighborhood, Nursey Hill Neighborhood, Wyncrest Neighborhood Attachment D Proposed 2023 Street Maintenance Plan Preservation methods •Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal –JPA Coon Rapids •Large area patching –Arden Hills PW Department •1” to 2” mill and overlay Tentative Schedule •Planned quantities due February 2nd •Bids opened March 17th •City concurrence March 27th •Large area patching as soon as asphalt plants open •Simultaneous with pothole patching •Crack seal July •Seal Coat and Fog Seal August Attachment E Proposed 2023 Street Maintenance Plan Preservation methods •Crack Seal, Seal Coat, Fog Seal –JPA Coon Rapids •Large area patching –Arden Hills PW Department •1” to 2” mill and overlay Tentative Schedule •Planned quantities due February 2nd •Bids opened March 17th •City concurrence March 27th •Large area patching as soon as asphalt plants open •Simultaneous with pothole patching •Crack seal July •Seal Coat and Fog Seal August Attachment F Projected PCI *Historical and projected PCI from ICON Pavement Management Software Questions? Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM – 1H MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Parkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop – Official Name Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ Council Should Consider Council should consider the Official Name of the nearly complete trail loop off of Parkshore Drive. Background/ Discussion As part of the Trident Development, Round Lake Senior Living facility, an exercise trail loop (Attachment A) is nearing construction completion. Upon completion and acceptance, the City will assume ownership. Currently, this trail has been referred to as the Parkshore Exercise Station Trail Loop. Per the construction plans, the City is to provide the Park Identification Sign. At the December 19th, 2022 Work Session, the PTRC presented their suggested names but due to time constraints this specific item was not discussed. These are the names that were submitted by PTRC members: 1. Exercise park and trail 2. Workout park and trail 3. Keep-fit park and trail 4. Fitness Park and Trail 5. Round Lake Fitness Park and Trail 6. For Your Health Park and Trail 7. Name the trail the length of a certain number of laps: 1-mile trail, 2k trail, etc. 8. Round Lake Park and South Shore Trail 9. Boot Camp Park and trail Page 2 of 2 (Fitness Park and Trail and Round Lake Fitness Park and Trail had the most votes from PTRC members.) The PTRC was given Attachment B, for reference. This is the City of Arden Hills approved “GUIDELINES TO ASSIGNING NAMES TO PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION FACILITIES” Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A – Trail loop plan view Attachment B – Naming Guidelines Mfg. By:Sold & Distributed By:P.O. Box 27328, Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-546-7787 1-800-622-5425 Fax 763-546-5050 E-Mail info@mnwiplay.com Please Initial & Sign the Final Top View: Arden Hills Senior Living Arden Hills, Minnesota THIS PLAN REQUIRES A FINISHED GRADE RESOLUTION CITY OF ARDEN HILLS GUIDELINES TO ASSIGNING NAMES TO PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION FACILITIES Naming Procedure -- Any Arden Hills resident, business, or organization may submit site names to the city. -- Submissions for parks, trails, and recreation sites will be given to the Parks Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) for deliberation. -- After careful consideration the PTRC will submit a recommended name to the City Council for final approval. Naming Criteria -- Geographic names must relate to prominent surrounding features to help the public identify the site's location such as lake names, names of bridges, street names, or community names. -- Historic names must be associated with important events that happened in the area. -- Functional names must provide a link to the activities, services, or programs associated with a site. -- Memorial names are meant to honor those who made significant contributions to society through years of service or donation AND to honor those who have been deceased for at least three years. -- Renaming parks, trails, or recreation sites is generally discouraged as it removes the honor and societal value of the existing designation. Memorials Memorials such as plaques or trees may be donated as a tribute to deceased residents AND to honor those who made significant contributions to society through years of service or donation. Donors must pay the full cost of the memorial procurement, installation, and maintenance. Plaque size and location plan must be approved by the Public Works Director with installation supervised by his/her staff. Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM – 1I MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Liaison Appointments Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A For Council Consideration The City Council should consider giving direction on the remaining Council Appointments for 2023. Background The City Council has remaining appointments to fill on different committees and commissions, the open spots are below. Council should discuss and give Staff direction on what to bring forward for approval at the next Council meeting. -Economic Development Commission -Karth Lake District -Ramsey County Local League of Governments -Cable Commission (beginning March 1st, 2023) Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM – 1J MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Public Inquiry Language Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A For Council Consideration The City Council should consider giving direction on revising the language for Public Inquiries on its City Council agendas. Background The City Council requested to discuss the language guiding the Public Inquiry portion of the regular Council meeting agenda. The language is provided below in italics. This is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, speakers must limit their comments to three (3) minutes. To facilitate a timely meeting, a speaker that is repeating, or agreeing with, a previous comment should simply state such and forego a longer comment. If a large number of citizens wish to speak, the Mayor may shorten the individual comment period. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the start of the meeting to allow a more timely presentation. Speakers should not use obscene, profane, or threatening language, or make personal attacks. Matters of litigation involving the City shall not be discussed during Public Inquiry by citizens or Council. The Council may not respond to speaker comments, engage in a debate, or take any action on the issues raised by citizens, but may direct City staff to research or follow up on an issue, if desired by Council. If Council directs further review by staff, the results of that review will be presented at a following regular Council Meeting. Examples of how other cities handle this portion of their agenda can also be found below. Page 2 of 2 Shoreview: Little Canada: Please limit comments to 3 minutes per person. Items brought before the Council will be referred for consideration. Council may ask questions for clarification, but no Council action or discussion will be held on these items. Mounds View: Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight’s agenda. Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes. Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Bench Handout Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM – 1K MEMORANDUM DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Retreat Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A For Council Consideration Council should consider providing direction on a potential Council Retreat in 2023. Background It is common for City Councils to hold Council Retreats on a regular basis, whether it is annually, every other year, or three years (some Councils do not hold retreats at all, and some do updates quarterly). A Council Retreat can take many different forms, but usually include goal setting, strategic planning, establishing Council Norms or Behavior guidelines, team building exercises, etc. The City of Arden Hills held an informal retreat in 2018 and prior to that held its most recent retreat in 2016. Staff believes with the start of this year a retreat would be beneficial to help align the City Council and Staff with priorities, set concrete goals, establish guidelines and do some basic teambuilding. This retreat would likely last one or two days, take place at City Hall and involve Council and Department Heads. While a facilitator has not been selected, Staff did engage with one two years ago and would like to revive those discussions and bring back a proposal for consideration. This could be approved at the first meeting in February with a potential retreat taking place in late February or March. If Council is open to this, they could provide potential topics or ideas in addition to those recommended by Staff below: • Short-term (one year) goal setting/priorities • Medium-term (two to four years) goal setting/priorities • Strategic planning exercises • Personality profiles (DISC, this would be if Council wants to pursue it) • Council Norms of Behavior Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact While Staff does not have a proposal in-hand, it is anticipated this would cost somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000; this item is not budgeted but there should be sufficient dollars to absorb this in the 2023 budget. Attachment N/A Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM – 1L MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 17, 2023 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Tracker Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider The Council should provide further direction on items presented on the Council Request Tracker. Background City Council will receive a verbal update on items the Council has previously directed staff to research and/or bring forward. Discussion N/A Budget Impact N/A Attachments N/A