HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-27-23-R It
-A DTEEN_HILLS
Approved: January 8, 2024
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
7:00 P.M. -ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City
Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Tom Fabel, Brenda Holden, and
Tena Monson
Absent: Councilmember Emily Rousseau(Excused)
Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault; Public Works Director/City Engineer
David Swearingen; Community Development Director Jessica Jagoe; City Attorney Amy
Schmidt; and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (4-0).
2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE
City Administrator Perrault stated the JDA has not met since the last Council meeting, nor has
the Energy Advisory Committee. The JDA Advisory Committee did meet on November 16th to
discuss the preliminary development agreement, infrastructure financing updates, and a possible
term sheet. It is anticipated the Preliminary Development Agreement will be ready for the
December 4th JDA meeting, as well as, a possible term sheet pending work to be completed yet
this week. The advisory committee is planning to meet again this Thursday at 1:30 PM virtually,
and it is anticipated a public audio link will be available. The next JDA meeting is planned for
December 4th, in addition to the items above it is anticipated the JDA will also receive the report
from the public engagement consultant from the November 1 st event. Another notable meeting
coming up is the December 6th Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission will be
discussing the comp plan and TRC amendments necessary to increase the density from 1,460
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 2
housing units to 1,960 units. In addition to the formal notices required, the City also included in
the newsletter an insert about the upcoming meeting. That concludes my JDA Update.
Councilmember Holden asked if the 1,960 units would be pursued no matter the cost to the
Arden Hills taxpayers. She said we don't have any traffic studies and we don't have financials.
She asked if facts would be twisted to fit into the 1,960 or would this number be reviewed based
on factual data when it comes in.
City Administrator Perrault stated the proposed density would be reviewed based on the
information the City and County has today. He reported the plans would be refined as the
development agreement moves forward in 2024. He explained costs would come into play during
the development agreement process. He noted the term sheet as it stands does say the maximum
number of units was 1,960, and it is anticipated to be constructed at that level, but it does say it
could be lesser as well. He noted this would be worked out during the development agreement.
Councilmember Holden questioned if the JDA had discussed the profit margin the developer
could have on this project. She recommended this be addressed and discussed by the JDA given
the fact this project would be funded by taxpayer dollars.
City Administrator Perrault reported the rate of return for the developer has not been discussed.
Councilmember Holden asked if Planning Commissioner Wicklund would be able to discuss
TCAAP planning cases.
City Administrator Perrault stated Commissioner Wicklund would be abstaining and not voting
on that planning case or be part of the discussion.
Councilmember Holden asked if the JDA would be discussing the setbacks for homes on
TCAAP. She stated it appears with 1,960 units the homes would only be three to five feet apart.
City Administrator Perrault reported there would not be a change to the lot standards from
2016. He explained 40 feet would be the minimum lot size.
Councilmember Holden stated she understood the City was encouraging homeownership within
the TCAAP development, but having one bus within the development would not alleviate the
problem of people getting to work. She encouraged the JDA to pursue more job opportunities
within this project.
Mayor Grant questioned if anything had been done on the updated AUAR.
City Administrator Perrault reported there was nothing to report at this time.
Mayor Grant inquired if the finances were still being considered by Ehlers.
City Administrator Perrault explained he would be touching base with Ehlers this week and
would be discussing when this information would be available for the Council.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 3
Mayor Grant expressed concern with the fact the project has been deemed to have 1,960 units
but no financial information has been provided to the City. He asked if the term sheet had been
completed by staff.
City Administrator Perrault indicated staff had drafted a term sheet and would be addressing
this further at the next JDA Advisory Committee meeting.
Mayor Grant inquired if this meeting would be open to the public.
City Administrator Perrault stated an audio link for the public would be provided on the City's
website for this meeting.
Mayor Grant commented on the TCAAP open house that was held on November 1. He requested
the comments received from the public at that event be provided to the Council.
City Administrator Perrault explained the Council would be provided with a follow up report
after the December 4 JDA meeting.
Mayor Grant asked that staff speak with the consultant in order to provide all public comments
from this event to the City Council. He spoke to how Rice Creek Commons was originally
envisioned to have 4,000 jobs. Since that time, 32 acres of commercial property has been turned
into residential. He inquired if staff had considered how to bring more jobs per square foot to the
development.
City Administrator Perrault stated the only changes that have been discussed was when the
Council discussed (on November 11) the remaining commercial pieces and what can be done with
the zoning. He explained this topic would be coming to the Council at a future worksession.
Mayor Grant noted originally the commercial property on TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons was
important for a lot of reasons, and that jobs are important and the economy is important in the
community in which you live. He stated Arden Hills has a lot of large employers and if we were
ever to lose one of those employers, it would not be good financial news for the city. He said Rice
Creek Commons offers the ability to bring jobs in to the community, which is the lifeblood and
the economic engine in our community. He did not believe it was a wise choice to turn 32 acres
of commercial property into residential.
3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
Donna Wiemann, 1406 Arden View Drive, stated 1,960 housing units was presented at the
community meeting on November 1. She understood the agreement being considered with the
developer stated this would be the maximum number, but this may not be the final number. She
expressed concern with the fact a Ramsey County Commissioner has stated this number may go
up or it may go down. She asked that the Councilmembers serving on the JDA publicly confirm
the number of units could go up or change. She noted recently a Councilmember stated the JDA
was on the path to clearing up traffic concerns with respect to TCAAP. Since a traffic study has
not been completed, she was unclear how the concerns have been cleared up. She discussed how a
Councilmember had stated cities along Highway 96 were building whatever they wanted. While
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 4
she understood this may be the case in other communities, she wanted to see examples of projects
along Highway 96 that match the size, scop and density of TCAAP.
George Winiecki, 4175 Old Highway 10, thanked the Council for serving the community. He
explained he has lived in the community for over 75 years. He indicated he did not understand
what the JDA was proposing for the TCAAP development. He stated he was concerned with the
original request of 1,500 units and now another 500 units was being added. He commented on
how this project will impact the current residents of Arden Hills. He understood Ramsey County
did not have spare cash laying around, but was proposing a large amount of affordable housing
within this project. He stated he wasn't saying the City shouldn't help people, but he feared too
many people were asking for help from the City, County and State. He questioned where money
would come from to take care of the proposed affordable housing. He anticipated there would be a
breaking point. He commented on how his property taxes would be going up 23% in 2024. He
believed that adding 500 additional units to Arden Hills would be a crushing blow to the
community and the City would not be able to afford the bill for the additional police, fire,
infrastructure and maintenance.
Linda Swanson, 1124 Ingerson Road, reported she still has not received a response to her
questions made to the Council on September 11 and October 1. She spoke to the Council
regarding transparency and commented on the discussions she has had with staff regarding JDA
Advisory Committee meetings. She expressed concern with the fact there was no record of when
the JDA Advisory Committee would be meeting. She was of the opinion, this was not
transparent. She urged the Councilmembers who serve on the JDA to be more transparent. She
recommended these meetings be accessible to the public and that the meeting schedule also be
made available to the public.
Mayor Grant requested staff prepare answers to the list of questions that were brought to the City
from Ms. Swanson.
City Administrator Perrault stated he would work with Ms. Swanson to draft answers to the
questions.
Councilmember Monson indicated she did not agree with staff responding to these questions
until she knew what the questions were.
Councilmember Holden recalled that at the September 11 and October 1 meetings the Council
requested staff to respond to these questions. She recommended staff review the minutes to see
what direction was provided. She did not support the Council changing their action from the
direction that was given at these meetings.
Ms. Swanson addressed the Council again and reviewed the two questions she provided to the
Council on September 11 and October 1. The first question she asked was that a full verbatim
report from City Administrator Perrault be placed on the City's website or in the Council minutes.
Councilmember Monson indicated she could support the TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons update
being posted on the City's website. She asked why this report was not already included in the City
Council minutes.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 5
City Administrator Perrault explained a summarized statement was written into the minutes,
but a verbatim statement was not provided.
Councilmember Monson supported a verbatim statement on TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons
being included in the minutes going forward.
Councilmember Fabel stated he believed the reports that were provided by City Administrator
Perrault were reasonable and ample.
Mayor Grant and Councilmember Holden supported a verbatim report being placed in the
minutes as well.
Mayor Grant asked what Ms. Swanson's second question was.
Ms. Swanson requested a list of any and all resident recommendations the JDA has included in
their plans as well as the resident that made the request. She expressed concern with the fact the
JDA was not listening to or hearing any of the requests being made by the public when it comes to
the TCAAP development.
Mayor Grant questioned if the City was at liberty to disclose resident communications.
City Attorney Schmidt explained correspondence between an elected official or a member of an
appointed body, is not public data,but the recipient or the sender may choose to make it public.
Councilmember Holden stated she believed this was a good question. She indicated she has
asked for things to be brought up by the JDA and she was told she had to attend the meetings.
Councilmember Fabel commented on the amount of communication and information that comes
to a public official, noting much of it is oral. He stated he would not be able to recall every bit of
information or suggestion that he has received from the public. He discussed how he brings a
collection of information to all of his deliberations, as does every public official. He stated he did
not have what Ms. Swanson was asking for.
Councilmember Monson agreed with Councilmember Fabel, noting people make broad
statements to the Council and she was taking this input from the public into consideration. She
noted she was also taking into consideration the comments from the City Council, which had her
reconsidering the zoning around the commercial district.
Ms. Swanson indicated her questions had been addressed.
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES
None.
5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
None.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 6
6. STAFF COMMENTS
None.
7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. November 2 Special City Council Work Session
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a
motion to approve the November 2, 2023, Special City Council Work Session
meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried (4-0).
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll
B. Motion To Approve Quote From Minnesota Roofing Company For Perry Park
Pavilion Roof Replacement
C. Motion to Approve Hiring of a Finance Director(Bench Handout)
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize
execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried
(4-0 .
9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
None.
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities
City Administrator Perrault stated water customers whose accounts are 90 days past due were
informed that the City intends to certify delinquent charges to Ramsey County to be collected with
property taxes. These customers have the right to a hearing in front of the City Council to discuss
this matter prior to certification.
Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m.
With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
B. Planning Case 23-018 — Zoning Code Amendment — Ground-Mounted Solar
Energy Systems In Residential Zoning Districts
Community Development Director Jagoe stated in February 2023, Alatus LLC proposed an
amendment to allow for the conditional use of solar energy systems within the Conservation
District. Alatus's proposal established a definition for Solar Energy Systems and added Solar
Energy Systems as a Land Use Category in the Land Use Chart for the Conservation District as
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 7
well as outlined special provisions for Solar Energy Systems in the Conservation District. The
request from Alatus was to establish a pathway for solar energy systems to be allowed as a
principal use through the Conditional Use Permit Process. The Zoning Code Amendment was
reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 8, 2023 and approved by the City Council on
April 10, 2023. While the Solar Energy Systems definitions are applicable to the City as a whole,
the special provisions and CUP process for Solar Energy Systems were specifically established for
the Conservation District.
Community Development Director Jagoe commented further on how ground mounted solar was
addressed by neighboring communities and provided an overview on the proposed ordinance
amendments. It was noted the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their October 4,
2023 meeting. At that time, they tabled Planning Case 23-018 with direction to staff to provide
language for the aesthetics, screening, and visibility of ground-mounted solar energy systems, to
incorporate the residential zoning districts that are regulated by the TRC, and incorporate
comments given by an All Energy Solar representative during the October 4, 2023 public hearing.
The Planning Commission reviewed an updated application at their November 8, 2023 meeting.
At that time, they recommended approval of Planning Case 23-018 for Zoning Code Amendments
to Chapter 13 by a 5-0-1 vote (Commissioner Collins was absent and Commission Wicklund
abstained).
Councilmember Fabel stated he was confused by the provision 7(a) Subd. 3 on the visibility of
the ground system. He reviewed the provision and asked if the systems could or could not be
visible from the right of way.
Community Development Director Jagoe explained solar energy systems shall be designed to
blend into the architecture of the building and minimize the view from public right of way, other
than alleys as well as adjacent property to the extent that doing so does not affect cost and
efficiency of the system. She reported she saw what Councilmember Fabel was saying in Subd. 3.
She recommended the language be changed to read: to the extent possible the systems shall not be
visible.
Councilmember Holden asked if staff had a definition for landscaping within the proposed
ordinance.
Community Development Director Jagoe reported she did not have a definition for landscaping
in the draft solar amendments. She noted the applicant would have to provide screening
information to the City. She was of the opinion at the time of installation, the landscaping would
have to provide screening.
Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m.
With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m.
C. Planning Case 23-019 — Chapter 13, Filling And Excavation And Chapter 15,
Erosion And Sediment Control
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 8
Community Development Director Jagoe stated at the April 17, 2023 City Council work
session, it was identified that Section 1325.08 Filling and Excavation in the Zoning Code
contained language that was inconsistent with Section 1510.01 Erosion and Sediment Control.
Council directed staff to update inconsistent language in the ordinance on the amount of land
disturbance and fill that can occur on a property triggering a permit. Staff were directed to work
with the Public Works Director/City Engineer to review the Filling and Excavation section of the
Zoning Code as the section is similar to the Erosion and Sediment Control standards of the City
Code.
Community Development Director Jagoe provided an overview of the proposed ordinance
amendments. It was noted the Planning Commission reviewed this application at the November 8,
2023 meeting. The Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioner Collins was absent) to recommend
approval of Planning Case 23-019.
Councilmember Holden thanked staff for addressing this item and bringing it forward to the City
Council.
Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m.
With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m.
11. NEW BUSINESS
A. Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements—SRF Proposal
Public Work Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated in October of 2022, a feasibility study
update was completed from a previous 2008 version of the proposed project corridor. On June 12,
2023, City Council approved Professional Services with Engineering Consultant, SRF, to
complete a "Shovel-Ready" design to pursue potential future funding opportunities. SRF has
produced plans considered 60%. With grant application opportunities approaching this Fall and
over the Winter, SRF will be providing a presentation to City Council an overview of the project,
community engagement summary, they will highlight some of the trail design features and their
cost impacts, overall updated cost estimate and potential grant funding opportunities.
Public Work Director/City Engineer Swearingen reviewed the potential budget impacts of this
project. The Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements project is in the proposed 2024-2028 CIP and
tentatively scheduled for 2025 construction, project funding would be derived from the City's PIR
Parks fund, Municipal State Aid (MSA), Ramsey County cost-share and grant funding. City Staff
is assuming that the project hinges on receiving external grant opportunities, if grant money is not
received it is likely the CIP cannot support a project of this size. The below graph illustrates the
projected PIR Fund balance through 2033, and this is WITHOUT this project programmed in.
Should the project move forward without external grant funding, it would drive this fund negative
for years unless the City were to consider bonding for this project on its own. The 2024-2028 CIP
budget for the proposed Old Highway 10 Trail is based off the latest feasibility study cost estimate
that was completed prior to design which was roughly $2.6 million total project cost. City staff
will need to adjust the project costs to reflect the latest cost estimate based off of the current
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 9
design which is $4.1 million. A couple items to note that are reasons for the significant increase
found through the design process is the boardwalk and retaining wall costs.
Mike McGarvey, SRF, further discussed the proposed Old Highway 10 trail improvements. The
project goals were discussed along with the public survey results. It was noted this trail would be
eight to ten feet wide and would run along the west/south side of Old Highway 10 extending from
the existing trail just south of Highway 96 to the existing trail at Lake Valentine Road. The project
timeline was discussed with the Council. The details involving the boardwalk were discussed in
further detail. He reviewed the cost estimates for the project and commented on the funding and
grant opportunities that would be available to assist with offsetting costs for the City. He
explained if the City were to receive grants from each of the funding sources, the City's obligation
would be approximately $1.2 million. He ended his presentation by discussing the next steps for
this project, which included applying for the various funding sources and finalizing the trail plans
by March of 2024.
Mayor Grant discussed the three different funding sources noting each grant opportunity would
cost the City$7,000 to apply for. He recommended the shovel ready date remain firm at March of
2024.
Councilmember Fabel asked what the optimism level was from SRF to receive the three funding
sources.
Mr. McGarvey explained he has been very successful over the years in receiving funding for
various different clients. He believed the City had more than a 50150 shot at each funding source.
He anticipated the federal requests would come in fully funding, if approved. He commented on
how the merits of this project make a strong case, which will assist with funding success.
Councilmember Holden stated she understood there were a lot of unfunded Safe Routes to
Schools surrounding elementary schools. She asked if it was reasonable to believe Arden Hills
would receive $1 million for this project when the total budget allocated for Safe Routes to
School was $10.2 million.
Mr. McGarvey stated he believed this project would be a good case.
Councilmember Holden requested further information on how the federal funding can be used.
Mr. McGarvey explained federal dollars can only be used for construction expenses, which was
$3 million of the project costs, including construction of the trail.
Councilmember Holden supported the City pursuing these grants but asked how much this
would cost the City in consultant fees.
Mr. McGarvey reported the federal money solicitation costs $8,000, the State application would
cost the City$5,000, and the DNR grant would be $5,000 or less.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 10
Mayor Grant stated he had concerns that the City would not receive the maximum for these
grants, but understand the City would not know unless they tried. He asked what percentage of a
match would be required from the federal funding.
Mr. McGarvey explained the Federal SRTS grant funding would require a 20%match.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported the City obligation does include
part of the matching,but noted the Ramsey County contribution could be used for the match.
Councilmember Monson questioned if the$4 million was in 2025 dollars.
Mr. McGarvey reported this was the case.
Councilmember Monson indicated this roadway was newly paved. She asked if the road would
be impacted in any way through this project.
Mr. McGarvey stated there would be some minor modifications made to the roadway at the edge
of the road because new curb and gutter was proposed.
Councilmember Monson reported she supported the City applying for these funding sources. She
supported the Council further discussing its priorities when it comes to trails along with the
strategic plans that were in place for the City's trails.
Councilmember Fabel pointed out this trail would run to the Valentine Hills Elementary School.
Councilmember Holden asked when the City would be pursuing the Roseville trail.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported staff was still in preliminary
discussions with Roseville and solicitation on this project will happen once MNDOT begins
design. He was hopeful this work would begin in the spring of 2024.
Councilmember Holden questioned if the trail was switching sides of the street at Highway 96.
Mr. McGarvey explained there was an existing trail in place that this project would tie into on
the west side of Lakeshore Place.
Councilmember Holden stated she believed it was hard to plan for this project or projects like it
because the City didn't know if they had enough funding in place. She indicated she did not
support the City pursuing the DNR grant.
Mayor Grant commented on how the DNR grant required a 25% match and was for greater
Minnesota.
Mr. McGarvey reported this was the case, noting the DNR would have an alternative
transportation grant that would be available in 2024 and it was for greater Minnesota. However,
he was uncertain if this grant would also be available to metro projects.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 11
Mayor Grant questioned when the City would know if they receive any State or federal funding.
Mr. McGarvey explained the City would hear back regarding the State money in April of 2024
and the federal funding would have a similar timeline.
Mayor Grant requested the project mention this trail would run along a mobile home community
as this may be favorable for the project. He indicated he could support the City going after the
DNR grant, while understanding the City's likelihood may not be good.
Councilmember Monson supported the City applying for all three grants. She questioned when
the State and federal grant funding would be available to the City.
Mr. McGarvey explained the State funding would be available in 2025 and the federal funding
would be available in 2028. He indicated part of the application for the federal funding would be
to request the funding as early as 2025, which would be appropriate for this project because it
would be shovel ready.
Councilmember Holden indicated the total DNR funding being granted in 2024 was $1 million
and she did not believe the City of Arden Hills would receive 25% of this funding. She believed
the City would be wasting $5,000 if applying for this funding. She recommended SRF receive a
copy of the bonding fund write up that was drafted for the legislature.
Mayor Grant agreed the odds were not great that the City would receive $250,000 from the DNR
when only $1 million was available. He stated over the past 12 years the City has constructed 7.2
miles of trails in Arden Hills. He believed this was a lot of trails considering the City was only
three miles long. He commented on how important it was for the proposed project to be shovel
ready before pursuing funding sources.
Councilmember Fabel supported the City pursuing the three funding sources.
Councilmember Holden discussed how when this roadway was reconstructed by the County it
was done in a manner to accommodate this trail.
MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to request a proposal from SRF to apply for potential grant programs
(Federal and State Funding) related to the proposed Old Highway 10 Trial
Improvement proiect, noting each grant application is approximately $7,000
in fees.
Councilmember Fabel asked for a friendly amendment to add in the DNR funding request.
Councilmember Monson stated there was not enough support to accept this friendly amendment.
The motion carried 3-1 (Councilmember Fabel opposed).
B. Resolution 2023-057 Adopting And Confirming Quarterly Special
Assessments For Delinquent Utilities
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 12
City Administrator Perrault stated delinquent utility amounts are certified to Ramsey County
quarterly. A list of utility accounts with a delinquent balance was compiled and notices dated
October 10, 2023 were mailed. These customers were informed of their delinquent status and
were asked to make payment of the delinquent balance by November 20, 2023. Utility accounts
with an unpaid delinquent balance would be certified to Ramsey County to be added to property
taxes payable in 2024. The certification amount is equal to the unpaid delinquent balance plus an
eight percent penalty. The list of remaining delinquent utility accounts was reviewed. The City
will request that Ramsey County levy the delinquent balances against the respective properties.
MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adopt
Resolution 2023-057, Certifying Delinquent Utilities to Ramsey County. The
motion carried (4-0).
C. Planning Case 23-018 Zoning Code Amendment—Ground-Mounted Solar
Energy Systems In Residential Zoning Districts
o Ordinance 2023-013 Amending Chapter 13, Section 1320, Subsection
1320.05 (Land Use Chart) and Section 1325, Subsection 1325.02
(Accessory Uses)
o Ordinance 2023-014 Amending Chapter 13, Section 1380, (TCAAP
Redevelopment Code, Subsections 5.1 and 5.2)
o Summary Ordinances 2023-013 and 2023-014 Amending Chapter 13,
Zoning Code, Sections 1320, 1325 and 1380
Community Development Director Jagoe stated to allow ground-mounted solar energy systems
as a land use in the R-1, R-2, R-3, NR-1, NR-2, and NR-3 residential zoning districts, the City's
Zoning Code would need to be amended to designate Solar Energy System as an Accessory Use.
If approved, an Applicant of any future proposed solar energy system within the R-1, R-2, R-3,
NR-1, NR-2, and NR-3 zoning districts would apply for administrative review and approval
through the building and electric permit process as drafted in the proposed ordinance
amendments. Staff has prepared text amendments based on the Applicant's narrative, the
Minnesota Solar Model Ordinance, the Minnesota Building Code, ordinances of neighboring
communities, and comments from the October 4, 2023 meeting of the Planning Commission for
"Solar Energy System" language within Sections 1320.05 Land Use Chart, 1325.02 Accessory
Uses, 1380 5.1 Applicability, and 1380 5.2 Additional Use Criteria. Amendments were also made
to Section 1380 6.1 General to All Zoning Districts to address solar energy system heights in TRC
residential zoning districts. Staff reviewed the proposed ordinance amendments in further detail
with the Council.
Community Development Director Jagoe explained the Planning Commission reviewed this
application at their November 8, 2023 meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for
consideration:
General Findings:
I. Donald Wahlberg, The Applicant, is proposing amendments to the language of Chapter 13
—Zoning Code of the City Code.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 13
2. Under the City's Zoning Code Section 1320.05, a Solar Energy System is considered a
prohibited land use in the Residential Districts.
3. The Applicant is proposing an amendment to alter the Land Use Chart in Sections 1320.05
and 1325.02 of the Zoning Code to allow a Solar Energy System as an Accessory Use in
the R-1, R-2, and R-3 Residential Districts.
4. The City is proposing to add special provisions for Solar Energy Systems to Section
1325.02—Accessory Uses.
5. The City is proposing an amendment to alter the Schedule of Permitted Uses Chart in
Section 1380 5.0 and 5.2 of the TCAAP Redevelopment Code to allow a Solar Energy
System as an Accessory Use with Criteria in the NR-1, NR-2, and NR-3 Residential
Districts.
6. The City is proposing to amend Section 1380 6.1 —General to All Zoning Districts to state
solar energy systems in NR-1, NR-2, and NR-3 are not exempt from height limitations
regulated by zoning district.
7. Of 17 local communities surveyed, a majority allow for ground-mounted solar energy
systems as a use in residential districts which can be approved administratively.
8. In Chapter 10 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan — Protected Resources, "City encourages
development of distributed solar energy systems that are in keeping with the community's
character and use community solar resources"is listed as an implementation strategy.
9. In Chapter 12 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan — Resilience and Sustainability,
"Encourage the use of renewable energy and work to protect access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems"is listed as an implementation strategy.
10. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the
City Council.
11. If the zoning amendments were approved, an Applicant would be required to apply for
administrative review and approval for a Solar Energy System within the R-1, R-2, and R-
3 Residential Districts and the NR-1,NR-2, and NR-3 Residential Districts.
12. The Planning Commission considered this land use application on October 4, 2023 and
tabled the application with direction for staff to revise the drafted ordinance language.
13. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the Text Amendment on
November 8, 2023.
Community Development Director Jagoe explained the Planning Commission originally
reviewed this application at their October 4, 2023 meeting. At that time, they tabled Planning
Case 23-018 with direction to staff to provide language for the aesthetics, screening, and visibility
of ground-mounted solar energy systems, to incorporate the residential zoning districts that are
regulated by the TRC, and incorporate comments given by an All Energy Solar representative
during the October 4, 2023 public hearing. The Planning Commission reviewed an updated
application at their November 8, 2023 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of
Planning Case 23-018 for Zoning Code Amendments to Chapter 13 by a 5-0-1 vote
(Commissioner Collins was absent and Commissioner Wicklund abstained).
Councilmember Monson asked what the timeline was for the applicant's project.
Donald Wahlberg, the Applicant, explained the project would not be constructed until next
spring.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 14
Councilmember Monson indicated she had comments regarding screening. She explained she
had extensive questions regarding rear versus side yard. She stated she would be happy to table
action on this item in order for the Council to hold a more broad discussion on this item. She
understood people wanted solar screened, but noted this was not something that could be screened
due to the sheer size and it would impact the efficacy of the system.
Councilmember Holden stated it was her understanding the language regarding screening was
taken from other cities ordinances. She asked if these cities were having concerns.
Community Development Director Jagoe explained five cities required screening and language
was borrowed from these cities. She indicated she did not speak to City staff to see if they were
having issues.
Councilmember Holden commented on how landscaping did not have to include plantings, but
rather could include fencing.
Councilmember Monson stated she understood this to be the case. She explained she reviewed
the minutes from the Planning Commission and noted they were split on the screening issue. She
indicated she still supported the Council further discussing how screening would be clearly
defined and addressed and recommended this item be tabled.
Mayor Grant asked if the Council could support Councilmember Monson working with staff to
further address her concerns regarding screening, or did the Council want to work directly to
address this matter.
Councilmember Holden stated there were many issues to consider when it came to screening.
Councilmember Monson supported the language requiring residents to do their best to mitigate
visibility issues while not requiring residents to make the entire system visible from alleyways or
right of way. In addition, she supported properties having systems in side yards.
Councilmember Fabel stated if solar systems were viewed to be favorable for the City's energy
structure, it would be good in this manner. He stated he trusted planning staff to impose the kind
of restraints that would be favorable to residents. He explained there was no urgency with this
Ordinance as the applicant was not looking to install his system until May of 2024. He supported
Councilmember Monson working with staff to further address the language regarding screening.
Mayor Grant asked if the screening language would prohibit neighbors from planting trees that
would encumber a solar system on a neighboring property.
Community Development Director Jagoe reported the way the language was drafted today there
was no protection for the homeowner with a solar system.
Councilmember Holden indicated the City had a lot of small lots where this would not work and
she agreed screening was a very important issue.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 15
MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved a motion to table action on this item to allow
staff to take further comments from the Council in order to bring back a new
proposal at the December 18, 2023 City Council Worksession. The motion
failed for lack of a second.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a
motion to table action on Planning Case 23-018 to provide the Council with
time to speak with the Planning Commissioners, Community Development
Director, while also providing time to discuss this topic at the December 18,
2023 City Council Worksession. The motion carried (4-0).
D. Planning Case 23-019 Chapter 13, Filling And Excavation And Chapter 15,
Erosion And Sediment Control
• Ordinance 2023-015 Amending Chapter 13, Section 1305, Subsection
1305.04 and Section 1325, Subsection 1325.08, and Chapter 15, Section
1510, Subsection 1510.01 and Section 1520, Subsection 1520.03
• Summary Ordinance 2023-015 Amending Chapter 13, Sections 1305
and 1325 and Chapter 15, Sections 1510 and 1520
Community Development Director Jagoe stated staff has prepared drafted ordinance language
to be added for the City Council's review. The proposed ordinance would establish consistency
between Chapter 13 and Chapter 15 on processes and procedures for the soil moving activities.
The applicable Sections to be amended are as follows:
• Section 1305.04, Zoning Code Definitions
• Section 1325.08, Filling and Excavation
• Section 1510.01, Definitions
• Section 1520.03, Escrow Requirement
Community Development Director Jagoe reviewed the proposed ordinance amendments in
further detail with the Council noting the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their
November 8, 2023 meeting and have offered the following findings of fact for your consideration:
1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language to make filling and
excavation quantities, activities, and permitting processes consistent across the City Code.
2. The proposed ordinance will include amendments to the language of Chapter 13 —Zoning
Code, Sections 1305.04 —Definitions and 1325.8 —Filling and Excavation and Chapter 15
— Grading and Erosion Control, Section 1510.01 — Definitions and 1530.03 — Escrow
Requirements.
3. The proposed ordinance amendments were reviewed and supported by the Public Works
Director/City Engineer.
4. The proposed ordinance amendments will align with Grading and Erosion Control
industry best management practices.
5. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the
City Council.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 16
6. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the Text Amendment on
November 8, 2023.
Community Development Director Jagoe reported the Planning Commission reviewed this
application at their November 8, 2023 meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of
Planning Case 23-019 for City Code Amendments to Chapter 13 and Chapter 15 by a 6-0 vote
(Commissioner Collins was absent). The following are motion language options for the City
Council to consider.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a motion
to adopt Ordinance 2023-015 for Planning Case 23-019 for City Code
Amendments to Chapter 13 Zoning Code and Chapter 15 Erosion and
Sediment Control to strike and add language to standardize the permitting
requirements for filling and excavation as well as the types of activities that
shall be allowed. The motion carried (4-0).
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a motion
to Authorize Publication for a Summary Ordinance of 2023-015 for Planning
Case 23-019. The motion carried (4-0).
E. Arden Hills Tobacco—Tobacco License Forfeiture
Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson stated Arden Hills Tobacco violated
City Code three times during a 12 month period. She explained that Arden Hills Tobacco was
relinquishing its tobacco license effective at 11:59 pm on Sunday, November 26. A compliance
check to confirm closure of the business occurred on Monday, November 27. Because the
business had surrendered its license, it was recommended the Council formally accept the
forfeiture of Arden Hills Tobacco's tobacco license at tonight's meeting.
Councilmember Holden asked how many tobacco licenses does the City have at this time.
Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson reported the City currently had six and
now there would be five. She explained the City currently had no cap on the number tobacco
licenses that were allowed in the City.
Councilmember Holden supported the Council putting a moratorium on tobacco licenses in
order to allow the Council to further discuss tobacco/cannabis uses in the City of Arden Hills.
Councilmember Fabel reported the Council had one very specific item before them, which was
the forfeiture of a tobacco license. He did not believe the Council had to discuss the potential of a
moratorium at this time.
MOTION: Councilmember Fabel moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion
to formally accept the forfeiture of the tobacco license of Arden Hills Tobacco.
Councilmember Holden stated she would like to discuss the topic of a moratorium prior to
voting on this item.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 17
Mayor Grant commented on how the discussion at this time had to be germane to the forfeiture
of the tobacco license for Arden Hills Tobacco.
Councilmember Monson asked if the forfeiture was accepted could the Council then move on a
moratorium.
City Attorney Schmidt reported this would be the proper process to follow.
The motion to accept the forfeiture of Arden Hills Tobacco's tobacco license
carried (4-0).
Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson explained the City had received one
tobacco license application for this location. She noted during the renewal process, a new buyer
has come forward under a different company name.
Councilmember Holden asked what this meant for the proposed moratorium.
City Attorney Schmidt stated a moratorium could be put in place and this would apply to the
active application.
Councilmember Holden explained she supported the Council reviewing this topic now versus
addressing this topic in the future.
Councilmember Fabel indicated this was an important topic, but he was concerned with the fact
no public notice was given regarding the proposed moratorium, nor was this topic on the agenda.
He commented on how this moratorium could impact local business owners and he believed the
City should be obligated to give public notice of the intent to address this topic at a future
meeting. He was of the opinion it was procedurally inappropriate to take action on this item
without giving the public notice.
Councilmember Holden reported when she discussed this matter with staff, she was told this
item did not need to be given notice, nor did the agenda have to be amended.
City Attorney Schmidt concurred and explained there was no specific requirement that notice be
given or that a public hearing be held on a moratorium or an interim ordinance, unless it is related
to livestock management or official controls related to housing. However, that doesn't mean the
Council couldn't do this, should they choose to.
Councilmember Monson stated she agreed with Councilmember Holden that this topic should be
further considered by the City Council, especially given the fact a tobacco license was just
forfeited. She supported the City having more controls in place surrounding licensing given the
concerns the City has had. She believed it would be nice for the Council to take the time to review
this topic as well as the violation fees further. She stated while the City does not have to legally
notice the proposed moratorium, she understood it may be a good idea. However, considering the
City has an active application for a tobacco license, she would favor a moratorium being put in
place at this time.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 18
Mayor Grant indicated he would favor a moratorium being put in place on new licenses. He
asked if the moratorium could be in place for one year.
City Attorney Schmidt reported this was the case.
Councilmember Monson questioned if Councilmember Holden would support a six month
moratorium.
Councilmember Holden recommended the moratorium be in place for up to one year. She stated
this would allow staff more flexibility. She asked if a six month moratorium could be extended,
should the need arise.
City Administrator Perrault reported a six month moratorium could be extended, or a year long
moratorium could be ended early. He agreed a one year moratorium could be put in place and that
it be ended if the Council were able to wrap this item up prior to 365 days.
Councilmember Monson stated she could support a one year moratorium with the understanding
it would end if Council were able to wrap this item up prior to the one year timeline.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to direct
staff to put a one year moratorium in place for new tobacco licenses in the
City of Arden Hills.
City Attorney Schmidt requested the Council provide staff with direction on what they were to
study and what official controls staff should be investigating.
MOTION AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a
motion to direct staff to put a one year moratorium in place for
new tobacco licenses in the City of Arden Hills directing staff to
study the number of licenses, zoning areas, fee schedule and
violation fees.
Councilmember Fabel recommended the impact of the proposed moratorium also be considered
and how future businesses in Arden Hills would be impacted.
Councilmember Holden stated staff could be directed to consider this as well but noted this
would be an abstract concept to measure.
Councilmember Fabel explained he would be abstaining from voting given the procedure the
Council was following.
The amended motion carried 3-0-1 (Councilmember Fabel
abstained).
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 19
13. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Monson explained the public asked about the number of housing units and if
the number would go up or down. She reported the 1,960 was a proposed number. She
commented if this number needed to change this would be considered by the JDA. She stated she
was not going to say that the number would not go up, , but at this point, she did not anticipate the
number would go up. She said she cannot say this for sure but that was her feeling today on the
density number.
Councilmember Monson reported the Energy Advisory Committee has released and RFP for an
energy consultant and responses were expected mid-December. This consultant would help with
the energy vision for the Rice Creek Commons development.
Mayor Grant stated mayors and city administrators from seven cities met last week and shared
information on what was occurring within their community.
Mayor Grant explained the City received two thank you's from election judges. He discussed
how Ramsey County runs the City's elections, but the City works to provide its election judges
with boxed lunches for election judges who serve.
City Administrator Perrault reported he was working with the Communications Coordinator to
confirm a time and location for the State of the City, which would be held on Saturday, February
10. He proposed this event be held at City Hall at 10:00 a.m. The Council supported this
recommendation.
Councilmember Monson asked if staff had dates for the LMCIT meeting and Council retreat.
City Administrator Perrault stated the LMCIT meeting would be held on Wednesday, January 3
at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall. He noted the Council retreat date would be set after the LMCIT meeting.
He indicated he would be bringing a contract forward for the consultant in December and
anticipated the retreat would be held in the first quarter of 2024.
Councilmember Holden suggested the contract not be brought forward until staff and the
Council had agreed on a date for the retreat.
Councilmember Monson supported staff bringing the contract forward as an effort to commit the
City Council and staff to holding a retreat.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 27, 2023 20
ADJOURN
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a
motion to adiourn. The motion carried (4-0).
Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:38 p.m.
ze-74
J i Hanson David Grant
C Clerk Mayor