Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 04-10-1989 r MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 10, 1989, 7:30 P.M. - VILLAGE HALL CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. . ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were present: Mayor Thomas Sather, Councilmembers Nancy Hansen, Paul Malone, JoAnn Growe and Thomas Mahowald. Also Present: Acting City Attorney Jerry Filla, Planner John Bergly, Engineer Donald Lund, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk Administrator Gary Berger and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. APPROVE MINUTES Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve the Regular Council Minutes of March 27, 1989, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) BUSINESS FROM FLOOR STREET LIGHTS; 1435 ARDEN OAKS DRIVE Frank Dolinar, 1435 Arden Oaks Drive, questioned if the City had plans to install street lights in his neighborhood. He advised the residents in the area have expressed concern relative to the darkness in the neighborhood since the area was developed; he referred to the tragic event which recently occurred in the area and explained that since the incident, the residents have again brought up the subject of the need for street lighting. . Councilmember Malone stated the Council had adopted a three-phased street lighting plan and has completed the first phase of the plan; installation of street lights at all major intersections. He explained that the second and third phases have not been implemented to date; the second phase would include street lights in the area of Arden Oaks Drive and the third phase includes lights at cul-de-sacs. Malone noted that residents differed in oplnlon as to whether or not the lights should be installed at the secondary intersections identified on the plan, therefore, Council determined the second phase lights would be installed, at the locations identified, upon formal request by residents of the neighborhoods. He explained a formal request should be forwarded to the Public Safety/Works Committee at the City Hall; the Committee meets the 3rd Thursday of each month. Councilmember Hansen commented that the area of Arden Oaks Drive has underground utilities; the lights provided by the City are mercury vapor lights at intersections to be attached to existing poles. She noted the residents in Dolinar's neighborhood had appeared before the PS/W Committee and were not interested in this type of lighting. Hansen suggested if the neighborhood is interested in another type of lighting the costs would have to be assumed by the residents. She suggested Dolinar discuss the matter with the residents and submit a proposal for alternative lighting or a formal request for the lighting provided by the City to the Committee and Council for discussion~ . AMEND AGENDA Mayor Sather amended the agenda by adding: "Approval of Planned Unit Development General Plan" under Item 7 (a), and deleting "Hearing, 7:30 p.m." under the same Item. Council concurred. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Malone questioned the cost of the OSHA gas detection kits, Item f, noting the cost should be $4,665.00. Public Works Supervisor Raddatz concurred. Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, that Council approve the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein~ a. b. c. d. e. f. g. . h. Approval of Amusement Device License for Miller Co. at Pot-O-Gold. Acknowledgment of Letter from Ramsey County on Traffic Signals on County Road E and on Lexington Avenue. Acknowledgment of Letter to Twin City Arsenal. Approval of Tree Removal Bid Award. Approval of Hiring of Summer Maintenance Personnel. Approval of Purchase of Gas Detection Kits for Public Works. Approval to Eliminate Computer Networking. Approval of List of Claims and Payroll. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 . Page 2 PRESENTATION; ASSOC. METRO MUNICIPALITIES Clerk Administrator Berger introduced Vern Petersen, Executive Director of AMM, who was present to inform Council of the operation and services offered by AMM. Vern Petersen introduced Roger Petersen, AMM staff member, and Sharon Klump, member of the Board of Directors and resident of Arden Hills. Petersen discussed the formation of AMM, number and population of member cities throughout the seven county metro area; he also reviewed the five legislative committees whose membership consists of elected officials and administrators from the member cities. Petersen explained the function of the organization and the fee structure for member cities. He stated the City of Arden Hills dues would be $1,750.00 per year, however, if the Council would consider joining AMM this year, the dues could be prorated and the amount would be $1,100.00. Council and Petersen discussed the extent of coordination between AMM and the League of Cities and other pertinent issues; pending legislation relative to TIF and tax relief. Councilmembers thanked Petersen for the presentation. REPORT OF PLANNER CASE #88-30; PUD, REZONING & PRELIM. PLAT, CONTINENTAL DEVLPMT, OLD HWY 10 10 & 1-694 Council was referred to Planner Bergly's revised report dated 4-5-89, relative to the application for PUD General Plan Approval, Rezoning from R-l to R-4 and Preliminary Plat Approval, Continental Development, Old Highway 10 and 1-694. Bergly stated the proposed PUD requires three separate Council actions for approval; General Plan approval, Preliminary Plat approval and approval of the Rezoning from R-l to R-4. He explained the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the General Plan submitted with several conditions, as listed in the Planning minutes of 4-5-89. Bergly advised the applicant was requested to appear before Planning Commission at their May meeting with a more detailed plan which includes building materials and colors, building lengths, interior floor plans, and which specifies the number and types of units contained in each building. He also reviewed the other conditions listed in his report on page 7. Bergly noted Council has the option to review the plans or authorize only Commission approval. Council questioned if the applicant was prepared to address any of the above listed issues; the applicant advised he was not prepared at this time. Council concurred they would prefer the applicant prepare the plans, as recommended by Planning Commission, prior to granting approval. Councilmember Hansen expressed concern relative to the handicapped access to garages from outside the buildings, especially during the winter months. She suggested the applicant consider a design to provide handicapped accessibility from the interior of the buildings to the garage. Council discussed the trail maintenance for accessibility of emergency vehicles. Planner Bergly advised it would be the responsibility of the developer to provide maintenance of the trail. Council discussed the possibility of the City being able to capture TIF increments on this site. Planner Bergly advised it appears the time frame for development should be sufficient to accommodate both the developer and the City for inclusion in the tax increment program. He stated there have been discussions relative to utilizing the tax increment for public improvements; it was noted interest was expressed in using the increments for park or trail improvement. Bergly explained if the site is included as part of the TIF program public improvements should be identified. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 ~age 3 CASE #88-30 (Cont'd) Councilmembers concurred they would prefer to review a more detailed plan; no formal action was taken on General Plan approval. . Planner Bergly advised the applicant is seeking approval of the Preliminary Plat for financing purposes; he suggested such approval be contingent upon General Plan approval, after Council review of the detailed plans. Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve the Preliminary Plat, Case #88-30, contingent upon approval of the PUD General Plan and based on the following: 1. The proposed preliminary plat is necessary to accommodate financing of the proposed PUD project and is designed specifically for the proposed General Plan. 2. The preliminary plat approval will be effective for development according to the PUD General Plan. If the General Plan is not approved or withdrawn prior to development, the preliminary plat will also be withdrawn. 3. Park dedication will be resolved prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve the Rezoning, Case #88-30, from R-1 Single Family Residential, to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District, contingent upon approval of the PUD General Plan and based on ... the following: 1. There have been zoning classification changes and development changes on adjacent properties to the north which indicate that a higher density than that shown on the Comprehensive Plan is appropriate. 2. A Concept Plan has been approved by the Village for a PUD which is found to be acceptable to the Village and requires rezoning. 3. The rezoning will only be effective for development according to the approved PUD General Plan, if that occurs. If the General Plan is not approved or is withdrawn prior to development, the rezoning will revert to the R-1 District. 4. Rezoning is necessary to accomplish the development objectives proposed in the PUD General Plan. 5. The R-4 rezoning will be Preliminary Plat, containing the parcel and Lot 5, containing the only for Lots 1 through 4 four apartment buildings. farmstead, will remain in of the prior approved The Park dedication the R-1 District. Acting Attorney Filla questioned if the developer understood the intent of the two previous Council actions; the proposed Preliminary Plat and Rezoning approval are contingent upon approval of the General Plan scheduled for submission at the May 8 Regular Council meeting. . Chuck Cook, developer of the project, advised he understood the intent of the Council actions. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) CASE #89-03; SITE PLAN REVIS., 1313 W. CO. RD. E, Council was referred to the Planner's revised report dated 4-6-89, relative to the application to construct a minor addition to the McDonald's building at the SW corner; an office and cashier window are proposed. Bergly explained any modification to an existing SUP requires an amendment, however, he explained the proposal does not intensify the business activity and less traffic congestion. In his opinion the proposed changes would benefit both the applicant and the Village. He stated the building addition will not protrude out further than the existing pickup window and will allow faster service to drive-through lines. Bergly noted that Council has the option to review this as a Site Plan Revision or an amendment to the Special Use Permit. Council concurred to review the matter as a site plan revision. . Bergly explained the Planning Commission recommended approval of the site plan revision at their meeting of 4/5/89. . . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 , Page 4 CASE #89-03 (Cont'd) Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve Case #89-03, Site Plan Revision for Building Addition, 1313 West County Road E, McDonalds, for a six-foot by 40-foot addition to provide a cashier's window and office space, based on the following: 1) The modifications will create a healthier, safer and more convenient service for patrons and the general public, and 2) The modifications are considered minor and the special use is existing, so treating the application as a site plan revision is appropriate. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) REPORT OF CITY ENGINEER RES. #89-18; APRV. PLANS & SPECS, ST. SEWER, 1680 OAK AVE Council was referred to a report from Clerk Administrator Berger dated 4-5-89, regarding the proposed storm sewer utilities to serve the area of Oak Avenue. Donald Lund, SEH, was present to review the plans prepared by Engineer Peters. He explained the proposal is to install a 12" storm sewer from Oak Avenue to connect with the existing 15" pipe on the Ramsey County park property; the plans include construction of catch basins and resurfacing in the area where damage occurs due to construction of the sewer line. Lund advised the estimated cost of the sewer construction is $13,200.00. He referred to Peters letter dated 4-10-89, which recommends the City seek informal quotes rather than advertise for bids, since the project costs are below $15,000. The letter also states that if the Council decides the costs will be assessed, he recommends a feasibility report be prepared and a date set for pubic hearing with the affects residents. Lund explained that the City will need to acquire drainage and utility easement to construct and maintain the storm sewer; Peters recommended the City Attorney begin the process of obtaining the easement. Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve Resolution No. 89-18, Approving Plans And Specifications For The Installation Of Storm Sewer Utilities To Serve 1680 Oak Avenue And Adjacent Areas (Improvement No. ST 89-02). Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Acting Attorney Filla explained that if the City decides to specially assess the costs of the project a public hearing is required; he suggested Council reserve the possibility of the assessment process by holding a public hearing. Micheal Daub, Attorney representing the Albergs, suggested Council consider dispensing with the public hearing process. He stated the cost is less than $15,000.00, it appears there are fewer property owners that are affected by the improvement and, he reminded Council the public hearing process will extend the time for project completion. Daub pointed out that Dr. Alberg is interested in completion of the project and has indicated he will pay the costs to resurface his driveway. Daub recommended Council proceed with the informal bid process. There was Council discussion relative to assessing the costs of the proposed project. Councilmember Hansen questioned if the residents in the area had been previously assessed for storm sewera Filla and Berger advised they had not researched previous assessments. Mayor Sather suggested the public hearing process be followed; he explained the Council may decide not to assess the project, however, the option remains opena Filla questioned if the plans prepared by the Engineer are sufficient to advertise for bids. Lund stated the plans are detailed enough to advertise for bids, however, a feasibility study would have to be prepared. There was discussion relative to the costs and time period for preparation of a feasibility report and advertisement for bids. It was determined the completion date of the project would be delayed approximately two weeks if the formal bid process is followed and the feasibility report would not be lengthy. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 . Page 5 . STORM SEW. (Cont'd) Growe moved, seconded by Malone, that Council authorize and direct the Engineer to prepare a feasibility report for the Oak Avenue storm sewer improvements for the Regular Council Meeting held May 8, prepare legal notice setting the date of Public Hearing for May 8, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., and advertise for bids for the project with the bid opening be held prior to the public hearing. Councilmember Mahowald questioned if the Council favored the assessment process; he was inclined to use General Funds to complete the project. Attorney Filla advised that since a petition was not received from property owners for the project, the Council could not award a contract that would be subject to special assessments without four Council votes. Mayor Sather, Councilmembers Malone and Growe, spoke in favor of assessing the project; Hansen stated she would favor assessing the project if the residents had not previously been assessed for storm sewer. Motion carried. (Growe, Malone, Mahowald and Sather voted in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1) Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, that Council direct the Engineer and Attorney to obtain and prepare the utility and drainage easements necessary to complete the Oak Avenue Storm Sewer project. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . ODOR PROBLEM; SNELLING AVE. Council was referred to the report from Engineer Peters dated 4-7-89, relative to the sewer odor problem on Snelling Avenue. Lund explained the odor has diminished over the winter months and Peters recommends the monitoring proposed be delayed until the smell returns; the residents were advised of the proposed delay and agreed. Lund advised the testing lab could have a representative on site within two hours when the odor returns. Council accepted the report and concurred with the recommendation. REPORT OF ACTING CITY ATTORNEY PURCH. AGREEMENT; KEM MILLING PROP. Council was referred to a memorandum from the Clerk Administrator and a letter from Attorney Filla, both dated 4-7-89, relative to the Kem Milling Purchase and amendments to the document as discussed at the 3/27/89 Council Agreement meeting. Filla reviewed the changes made to the proposed Agreement, which has been signed by Kern Milling: . Sections 1 & 4 - Amendments relate to conveyance of personal property remaining on the site between the date of closing and possession; the seller would have approximately 3 three weeks to remove materials from the site and would continue to insure the property for public liability during that time. Section 6(e) - Amendment requires a "Bill of Sale" for the personal property and is necessary so that the City has title to the personal property which remains on the premises after the date of closing. The personal property that would remain, specifically above and below ground tanks and cookers, may have salvage value and would be taken into consideration by persons bidding on the demolition project. Section 9 - Amendment is to insure that all property owned by Darling & Company is conveyed to the City; the boundary survey will provide a legal to be used on the deed of conveyance. Section 11 - Amendment indicates the seller shall remove all personal property, except those items contained on a list provided to the City be May I, 1989. This section also requires the seller to remove any liquids in the storage tanks, above and below ground. . Section 24 - Amendment changes the date the proposal will remain valid until April 11, 1989. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 'Page 6 KEM MILLING (Cont'd) Filla advised the property owner is not interested in sharing the cost of the environmental audit, nor would they be interested in paying more than one-half of the taxes payable in 1989. He stated if the City acquires the property this year the property would be tax-exempt in 1990; the cost in 1989 would be approximately $7,500.00. . Clerk Administrator Berger reported briefly on the quotes received from three firms for the environmental audit. There was discussion relative to extension of the dates that the proposal would remain valid, closing and purchase of the property; Council and Attorney Filla expressed concern that the Phase I results from the environmental audit may not be received prior to the date listed in the agreement. Filla advised this problem was not anticipated and suggested the dates be extended. Rolfe Warden, Attorney for Darling & Company, stated it appears the timing is right and there is sufficient time to receive the results of the preliminary audit. After further discussion, the attorneys and Council agreed to amend the dates of the agreement to coincide with the dates of the regularly scheduled Council meetings and to allow sufficient time for the environmental audit results to be reviewed by Council. Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, that Council approve the proposed Purchase Agreement between Darling & Company and the City of Arden Hills, and authorize the Mayor and Clerk Administrator to execute the Agreement ... and supplement to the proposed purchase agreement, subject to the following: 1. Date of Closing to be changed from May 10, 1989 to June 12, 1989. 2. Date of Notice of Termination from April 27, 1989 to May 30, 1989. 3. Changes in dates to be reflected in amended paragraphs on proposed purchase agreement; or be means of a separate supplement. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) EVIRON. AUDIT; KEM MILLING SITE Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated 4-10-89, regarding three quotes received to conduct an environmental audit at the Kem Milling site. Berger advised the first phase of the audit will identify any hazardous materials in the building that will need to be disposed of separately from the demolition; pending the results of Phase I, Phases II and III may not be needed. Councilmember Malone noted the quote from Braun does not include asbestos testing. In reviewing the quote from Delta, Phase II of their proposal would include asbestos testing. . Malone moved, seconded by Growe, that Council direct the Clerk Administrator to enter into an agreement with Delta Environmental Consultants to conduct Phase I and the parts deemed necessary of Phase II, of the environmental audit of the KEM Milling site, and specific that Phase I of the audit be completed and results returned to Council by May 24, 1989. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) LEASE AGREEMENT; CELLULAR ONE Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated 4-7-89, relative to the proposed Cellular One Water Tower Lease Agreement. Acting Attorney Filla reviewed the amendments to the agreement and referred Council to his letter dated 4-5-89, which outlines the changes requested by the Attorney representing Cellular One in his correspondence of 3-28-89. Filla advised the following three items were not inserted in the draft agreement: . 1. The Telephone Company requested rental adjustments be maximized at 20% per rental terms, as opposed to a straight comparison to the increase in the cost of living index over the same period of time. 2. The Telephone Company would like paragraph 6(e) to permit immediate access by the Telephone Company in the event of an emergency or equipment failure. 3. The Telephone Company would like to add paragraph 16 (h) which indicates that as long as the Telephone Company is attempting to cure any defaults with due diligence, the time for curing the default will be extended until the Telephone Company remedies the situation. . . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 ,Page 7 CELLULAR ONE (Cont'd) In addition, Filla advised the Council should determine the amount of base rent and addition rent, as stated in Section 4 and the amount of reimbursement for costs as stated in Section 16(e). He noted the Agreement continues to be contingent upon the receipt of an access easement from Control Data. Filla advised that Cellular One indicated they are willing to accept the insertion of a paragraph which would specify the rental adjustments would be made gradually over a five year period, at the rate of no greater than 4% per year instead of no increase for 5 years and then a 20% increase. He stated the proposal is more beneficial to the City and had been negotiated by the Clerk Administrator. Bryan Rogers, Cellular One, provided Councilmembers with a projected 15 year rental income per municipalities. Rogers and Council discussed and agreed to the following amendments to the proposed agreement: -Reasonable Expenses: The Telephone Company agrees to pay $1,000.00 to the City to cover expenses, such as legal, engineering and other administrative costs, incurred in reviewing the proposed Lease Agreement, and $200.00 per occasion toward any subsequent reviews. -Emergency Access: The Telephone Company will be required to notify the Public Works Supervisor or Ramsey County Sheriffs Department prior to entering the tower for emergency situations; the Public Works Supervisor will provide a key for access. -Annual Rental Adjustments: The Telephone Company agrees to pay an annual increased rental amount during the entire term of the lease, based on the cost of living index during the previous year, which shall not exceed four percent of the of the previous years' rent. Council discussed the monthly base rent; it was suggested the amount be set at $600.00 per month for the base rent and an additional fee of $25.00 per month for each microwave antenna installed, up to a maximum of two. Filla noted the Agreement provides three portable telephones for use by the City for a period of one year. He explained the telephones are provided by Cellular One and the City would for pay for time the phones are in use and a monthly rental fee for the equipment at the government rate. Filla stated Council may determine whether or not to utilize this option. Rogers expressed opposition to the proposed $600.00 per month base rent; he stated a precedent would be set in his dealings with other communities in the area. Council concurred that the Agreement offers the tenant 60 days to cure defaults and, if necessary, the Telephone Company could request an extension. Rogers stated this request, relative to the curing of defaults, may be deleted. Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, that Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk Administrator to execute the proposed Water Tower Lease Agreement with Cellular One, contingent upon the following amendments to the Agreement: 1. The base rental fee be $600.00 per month and an additional $25.00 per month, per microwave antenna installed, up to a maximum of two microwave antenna. Councilmember Hansen stated she did not favor the motion; she preferred either a set fee of $600.00 including two microwave antennas or as proposed to be compatible with similar neighboring cities. Filla and Berger advised they had contacted other communities and determined the $600.00 rental fee was reasonable. . . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 , Page 8 CELLULAR ONE (Cont'd) Malone moved to amend the motion, seconded by Growe, to include the following conditions: 1. Amend Section 16(e): The Telephone Company agrees to pay a one-time fee of $1,000.00 toward expenses incurred by the City for the review of this lease, and $200.00 per occasions for each subsequent reviews. 2. Amend Section 4(b): The rent payable by the Tenant shall increase four percent (4%) per year during the entire length of the lease and its renewal. 3. Amend Section 6(e): The City shall allow access to the premises at all times, upon notification of the Landowner, the Public Works Supervisor or Ramsey County Sheriffs Department. Amendment to the motion carried. (5-0) Original motion as amended carried. (Mahowald, Growe, Malone and Sather voting in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1) REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CITY ATTORNEY; SELEC. PROCESS Council was referred to a report from Berger dated 4-10-89, relative to a proposed selection process for rating the City Attorney applicants. Council reviewed the proposed point rating system and concurred to change the number of points for legal resources to 2 and add 3 points if there is no conflict of interest; the firms receiving the highest number of points would be reviewed at the Council worksession scheduled for 4/17/89. CITY ENGINEER; RFP PROCESS Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated 4-5-89, which recommends a selection process for hiring the City's civil engineer. Council concurred with the recommendation to direct staff to select 15 local, civil engineering firms, utilizing the "Consulting Engineers Council of Minnesota" directory, and send them a Request for Proposals with a return deadline of May 1, 1989; the proposals would be reviewed and firms selected for interviews at a future meeting. Councilmember Hansen requested no RFP be sent to the Hickok Engineering firm; she stated high points should be given for Municipal experience in dealing with Elected Officials and determining City policies. REVISED CONSENT AGENDA FORMAT Council was referred to a memorandum from Administrative Secretary Mary Ann DeLaRosa dated 4-5-89, relative to a proposal for a revised Consent Agenda format. Councilmembers favored the revised format and preferred the Agenda to be printed on 8-1/2 x 11 inch colored paper. The Council commended DeLaRosa for the format. OTHER BUSINESS SIGNAL LIGHTS; LEXINGTON/GREY FOX & COUNTY ROAD F Councilmember Hansen questioned if the cost of the signal lights at Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox and County Road F would be shared with the City of Shoreview. Councilmember Malone recalled a cost sharing was previously discussed for the signal at Lexington & Grey Fox, however, a decision was not made to share the costs with Shoreview. Council directed the Clerk Administrator to contact the County Engineer to determine the cost sharing proposal on the signal light at County Road F and Lexington Avenue. EMPLOYEE STATUS; W. BRUNETTE Councilmember Hansen questioned the status of City employee Wayne Brunette; has he retired or requested disability leave. Berger advised he has been in contact with Brunette and the matter would be discussed at the worksession scheduled 4-17-89. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 r' Page 9 RECYCLING Councilmember Hansen suggested the days for recycling be included in the Town Crier calendar. . MINN. CITIES CONF. Councilmember Growe reported on the Minnesota Cities Legislative conference; she found the conference to be extremely worthwhile and urged Council to attend. AMM MEMBERSHIP Councilmember Mahowald questioned if the City would be joining the AMM organization. Berger advised that funds are budgeted and he will be preparing a report on the matter for a future meeting. OPTICON SYSTEM Councilmember Mahowald questioned if the City is considering purchase of the Opticon system for emergency vehicle preemption. Councilmember Hansen did not favor the purchase; it was noted the system is opt iona!. AIR QUALITY BOARD Mayor Sather reported on the Air Quality Board meeting held 4-7-89; he noted a public hearing is scheduled for April 24 and he would advise Council if the date is confirmed. ADJOURN Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, at the meeting be adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . Gar~e~ge~ Clerk Administrator ~~ Mayor NOTICE OF MEETING The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, April 24, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall. . .