Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 08-08-1988 r .' I . . . frlNUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 8, 7:00 p.m. - Village Hall CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL The roll being calltd the following members were present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Gary Peck and Jeanne Winiecki. Absent: Councilmembers Nancy Hansen and Thomas Sather. Also present: Attorney James Lynden, Planner John Bergly, Engineer Barry Peters, Park Director John Buckley, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk Administrator Gary Berger and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. . CLOSED MEETING Council discussed pendinQ special assessments in a clossd meeting between 7:00 - 7:30 p.m. APPROVE MINUTES Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki. that Council approve the minutes of the July 25, 1988 Regular Council Meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) BUSINESS FROM FLOOR None. REPORT OF PLANNER CASE #88-25; SUP ELEC. RECEIVING DISH, CONTROL DATA, 4201 NO. LEXINGTON Council was referred to Planner Bergly's report of 8-8-88, regarding the request to install an electronic receiving dish on the roof of Control Data Corporation, 4201 North Lexington. Bergly explained the antenna is proposed to be installed on the roof of Building #2 in the Control Data complex. The dish is 1.8 meters (5.9 feet) in diameter and will . be installed to the maximum height will be 7-1/2 feet above the roof. The Planner reported there was a public hearing held at the 8-3-88 Planning Commission meeting; no one appeared to speak in favor of or opposed to the SUP. Bergly identified two. homes to the west and north that would have limited exposure to the antenna and explained these residences would also view the City water tower and mechanical equipment on other buildings in the area. Council was referred to the Planning Commission minutes of 8-3-88. recommending approval of the Special Use Permit with conditions as noted in the minutes. Bergly advised a Public Hearing was held at the Planning Commission meeting and no one appeared to speak in opposition to the request. Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve Case #88-25. application for Special Use Permit to install a VSAT "dish" antenna on Building #2. Control Data Corporation, 4201 North Lexington Avenue, contingent upon the following: 1. The antenna be located on the roof as near the center of the building as possible. 2. The antenna is to be 1.8 meters in diameter. 3. The antenna shall be no higher than 8 feet above the roof. . Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) CASE #88-22; SITE PLAN REVIEW & VAR. FOR PARKING LOT, Council was referred to the application for Site Plan Review parking lot expansion and Variance for Surfacing Material at Bethel Collega. Planner Bergly advised the Master Plan for the campus would be amended with the addition of the parking lot as proposed and the elimination of a parking lot shown on the sourheast corner of the campus near the new maintenance building. Bergly stated the proposed parking lot has no acess from external streets and the trees in the area would be saved and relocated on the site. The Planner noted that RCWD has expressed concern relative to the drainageway on site; SOme erosion has occured in the drainage area and RCWD has indicated the erosion may have been created by water coming from areas off campus. RCWD has requested Bethel prepare a water management plan before considering approval of a drainage permit; Bergly advised the preparation of the plan would delay the project several months. . . . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 2 ~ ,. . CASE #88-22 (Cont'd) Council was referred to the Board of Appeals minutes of 7-21-88 and the Planning Commission minutes of 8-3-88; approval of the variance and the Planning Commission the Site Plan Revie~ with conditions. both bodies recommended recommended approval of Council discussed the deletion of one of the parking lots on the Master Plan in order to accommodate the lot in this location. Also discussed was the possibility of screening the proposed parking lot from Hamline Avenue. I Bergly stated it would be appropriate to relocate the trees on the Hamline side of the parking lot to serve as a buffer; he noted the parking lot would be at a higher elevation than Hamline Avenue. He advised a condition could be attached to approval indicating the trees be placed on the eaat aide of the lot to aerve as a buffer. Council questioned the type of surface material proposed for the parking lot. Bergly explained the material utilized would be Class I aggregate suface; he noted it compacts more and is more water repellant due to compaction. Council questioned if the material used would create dust problems in the area. Engineer Peters advised the lot would not have a constant stream of traffic and the possibility exists under hot/dry conditions that a dust problem could occur; he suggested a condition could be attached to approval recommending the applicant water the parking area to control dust problems. He stated he would recommend approval of the proposed Class I aggregate surface. Craig Hjelle, Director of Physical rlant at Bethel College, advised the college . would be willing to relocate the trees on the east side of the lot although the lot is not very visible from Hamline Avenue. He also stated the college is trying to "stage" construction of the parking lot for budgeting purposes and the aggregate surface was suggested for economic reasons. Hjelle indicated the funds proposed for the lot would be utilized this year toward preparation of the report requested by RCWD, the parking lot would be constructed in 1989 and the bituminous surfacing would be proposed for completion in 1990. There was Council discussion relative to condition #4, page 3 of the Planning Commission minutes. Planner Bergly explained the intent of the Commission was to recommend the bituminous surface be in place within one year of completion of the parking lot construction, rather than within one year from date of Council approval. Moved by Winiecki, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Case #88-22, Site Plan Review and Variance for Parking Lot Surfacing Material, Bethel College, contingent upon the following: 1. The Rice Creek Watershed District issuing a permit for the proposed stormwater drainage plan, including repair of the eroded ditch adjacent to the parking lot. . 2. The Village Engineer approve the surfacing material as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Bethel College provide a bituminous surface on this lot, approved by the Village Engineer within one year from the date of completion of construction of the aggregate surface lot and prior to students beginning fall semester. 4. The parking lot shown in the southeast area of the Campus Master Plan, specifically shown to the rear of the Maintenance Building, be deleted. 5. All trees or their equivalent be replanted to the area east side of the parking lot adjacent to Hamline Avenue to serve as a buffer. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) CASE #88-23; REAR YARD SETBACK VAR, 1377 EIDE CIRCLE, GERALD DREYLING Council was referred to the Planner's report of 8-3-88,_ relative to the application for a 12 ft. rear yard setback variance for construction of a three season porch at 1377 Eide Circle. Bergly reviewed his report of 8-8-88 and referred Council to the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting 7-21-88 and Planning Commission meeting of 8-3-88. Both bodies recommended approval based on the identified hardships as listed in the minutes. . I . . ~inutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 3 CASE #88-23 (Cont'd) The Planner stated the adjacent homeowners had been contacted by the applicant and they did not express any objections to the proposal; he noted the porch would not be visible from either neighbors residence. Bergly explained the property to the rear of Dreyling's residence is Floral Park, owned by the City, and that the applicant had planted a row of trees which provide adequate separation between the residence and the park. . Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Case #88-23, Rear Yard Setback Variance of 12 feet, 1377 Eide Circle, Gerald Dreyling, based on the hardship identified as the unusual lot depth and configuration, and the fact the requested variance does not negatively impact the adjacent properties. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) CASE #88-24; VAR. SIGN HGT & SETBACK, 4797 HWY 10. SCHERER LUMBER COMPANY Council was referred to the Planner's report of 8-3-88, outlining the requested variances for sign height and and front yard setback for a business sign at the Scherer Lumber Company. Bergly stated the requests are for a front yard setback variance of 20 feet and a sign height variance of 9 feet. . The Planner referred Council to the Board of Appeals minutes of 7-21-88, recommending approval of the front yard setback variance, due to the shortage of open space in the front yard and the fact the previously granted setback variances appeared to set a precedent for recommending approval of the request. He explained the Planning Commission also recommended approval of the request at their meeting held 8-3-88. . Bergly referred Council to the Board of Appeals minutes and Planning minutes recommending denial of the 9 ft. sign height variance; the motion passed at the Board of Appeals meeting and failed at the Planning Meeting. He explained the Board of Appeals had recommended a compromise solution involving a 4 ft. height variance and the Planning Commission recommended approval of a 4 ft. sign height variance. The Planner advised the Planning Commission had considered all recent improvements to the sight, the removal of the existing sign on the top of the building and the fact the travel lanes of Highway 10 are farther away from the parking lot than other industrial sites as basis for recommending approval of the 4 ft. height variance. There was discussion relative to the signage on the site and a time-frame for removal of the existing rooftop sign. Mayor Woodburn commented that other sign height variances have not been allowed; he cited several examples of businesses that had requested variances for sign height. Bergly advised the Big Ten Supper Club sign is at 20 ft. . Winiecki commented that the business is contractor/supplier related and not a retail operation; she stated the customers should be aware of the location if they had been to the site. Larry Leitschuh, representing Scherer, stated the company has been trying to renovate the site to make the lumber less visible and it requesting the height variance to make the sign more visible. He advised the top of the proposed sign, as revised, would be 18.6 ft. Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Case #88-24, A 20 ft. Sign Setback Variance as requested by Scherer Brothers Lumber, and in addition a maximum 4 ft. Sign Height Variance, with a recommendation that the applicant consider the sign height at 18.6 ft., based on the Council intent to eliminate the unsightly signage existing on the site rather than the fact the extra height is necessary for visibility. Peck moved to amend the motion, seconded by Winiecki, to include the condition that the applicant be required to remove the existing roof mounted sign on or before September 15, 1988. . Amendment to the motion carried unanimously. (3-0) Original motion as amended carried. (Winiecki and Peck voting in favor; Woodburn opposed) (2-1) . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 4 CASE #88-24 (Cont'd) Councilmember Winiecki requested the applicant review the current address for Scherer Lumber; the application mailing address in New Brighton and the Company is located in Arden :4 lists the Hills. . CASE #88-28; SITE PLAN REV. LAB ADDN 4001 LEXINGTON AVE. Council was referred to the Planner's report of 8-3-88, relative to the proposal to construct a lab addition at 4001 Lexington. Land O'Lakes. I The Planner advised all Ordinance requirements have been met and the materials proposed for construction compatible with the existing building. He noted the drainage plan had been approved by the RCWD and would be issued upon payment of fees by the applicant. Bergly noted the plantings would be replaced in the landscaped area surrounding the proposed addition. The Planner explained the addition would be used for warehouse storage for equipment and there would be no storage of hazardous chemicals. He stated no additional office space would be provided, theerfore parking would not be affected. Council was referred to the Planning Commission minutes of 8-3-88, recommending approval subject to receipt of the RCWD permit. Moved by Peck, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve Case 88-28, Site Plan Review for Lab Addition at Land O'Lakes, 4001 No. Lexington, subject to the applicant receipt of the permit from Rice Creek Watershed District. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) . . CASE 888-27; REQ. TEMPORARY PERMIT SATELLITE ANTENNA, 4105 NO. LEXINGTON Planner Bergly explained the request for a temporary permit to install a satellite antenna was submitted for Council consideration due to the fact the SUP application was not submitted prior to the deadline for publication of Notice of Public Hearing, as required by the Ordinance. Bergly advised the antenna was essential to the operation of the insurance business which recently moved to the building located at 4105 Lexington. He explained he was submitting the request for Council consideration and was unsure of City policy regarding such matters. Council questioned the permanency of the antenna structure once it is installed. Gary Myhre, representing contel. explained the antenna is a permanent structure however it is easily removed from the site; he noted it could be removed in one day. He advised the insurance company owns the dish and would be moving it to their new location and it is essential to the business operation. Myhre also advised the "dish" meet all State requirements and design tests. . The Planner adVised the dish would be placed to the rear of the building and would not be visible from the adjacent roadways. He stated the only residential development affected would be an apartment complex located across Lexington Avenue in the City of Shoreview and the complex has a similar antenna. Bergly advised the "dish" may be visible from the third floor of the Roseville Bank and Land O'Lakes buildings. . Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve the request for a temporary permit to install a Satellite "Dish" Antenna at 4105 North Lexington Avenue, Contel, permit to expire within 24 hours after the first Council meeting held September 12. 1988, if formal Council approval is not granted. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR STORM SEWER; 1451 ARDEN PLACE Council was referred to a memorandum from Public Works Supervisor dated 8-5-88, relative to the storm sewer problems at 1451 Arden Place. Raddatz advised he had responded to a complaint from the resident at that location that the rear yard was caving in. He checked the pipe and found it to be in poor condition. Raddata and Engineer Peters checked the culvert to determine how it could be repaired or replaced. . . I . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 5 ST. SEWER (Cont'd) Raddatz reviewed City records and could not find a plan outlining the pipe installation. He also explained the ditch had been filled and evergreens were planted on top of the pipe. He advised the staff was unable to clear the existing pipe with the jetting truck; when the crew dug up the pipe it was found to be a metal pipe that has corroded. The Public Works Supervisor requested Council determine the extent of City responsible for repairing the culvert; a neighbor in the area advised the City installed the pipe but could not remember the contractor's name. The Engineer and Raddatz were unable to locate any records which indicate the City installed the culvert. . Raddatz stated if Council determined it was the responsibility of the City to repair the culvert, he would recommend a plastic pipe replacement. The cost estimate.. including backhoe rental, would be approximately $6.00 to $8.00 per ft. for replacement of 100 ft. of pipe and $500.00 for the backhoe. Council questioned if it would be necessary to acquire an easement from the property owners and if there would be any problems with maintenance of the culvert due to the existing trees. Raddatz advi.sed the homeowners have indicated they would grant an easement and he stated the trees would be affected if the entire pipe was replaced. Councilmember Winiecki suggested when the easement is drafted it should include City exemption from liability concerning the existing trees if maintenance is necessary. There was discussion relative to drainage patterns in the area, the method of 4It installing the replacement pipe which could eliminate excessive digging in the area, determining the size of the easement and cost participation by the homeowner. Council concurred that the City would be responsible for correcting the situation by replacement of the.. pipe . Engineer Peters advised he would determine the size of the easement after the pipe was installed; normal easement are approximately 10 or 15 feet. Peter Meyers, 1451 Arden Place, indicated he would be agreeable to granting an easement and advised his main concern is the preservation of the evergreens to the extent possible. Peck moved. seconded by Winiecki, that the Public Works Supervisor and Engineer be instructed to proceed with the project as outlined for Council and that the City Attorney be requested to draft an easement for the entire length of the storm sewer located at 1451 Arden Place, which includes exempting the City from liability relative to the existing evergreen trees planted in the culvert in the event maintenance of the storm sewer is required. Council further determined the costs for drafting the easement would be borne by the City and the costs for review of the easement by an attorney and for obtaining and submitting a "right-of-entry" document would be borne by the Peter Meyers. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) 4It COUNTY RD. D; SHOULDER IMPRVMT. Council was referred to a memorandum from Raddatz dated 8-5-88, recommending Council reconsideration of improvement of County Road D by shoulder paving. Raddatz explained the County has indicated they would defer billing the City for the project costs until January 1989 to allow budgeting of funds. Steve and Vicki Hinkel, homeowners on County Road D, favored paving the shoulder for safety purposes; it was their opinion the gravel shoulder created a hazardous situation for bike riders and pedestrians in the area. Councilmembers expressed concern that improvement of the shoulder could create a dangerous situation for pedestrians and bikers by allowing vehicular traffic to utilize the bituminous surface as a traffic lane. There was extensive Council discussion relative to creating a dangerous situation by improvement of the shoulder and the appearance of the street if the Roseville portion were improved and the Arden Hills portion was not. . Peck moved, seconded by Winieck, that Council request Ramsey County complete the shoulder improvement project along County Road D in Arden Hills this year and defer billing the City for payment until January, 1989 to allow Arden Hills to budget the funds for 1989. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) Minutes of the rirden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 6 . REPAIR LIFT STATION #5 Public Works Supervisor Rsddatz advised Council the No. 5 Lift Station was struck by lightning and sustained damage to the control panel. Raddatz advised staff members worked through the night to manually run the lift station and an electrician had rewired the panel as a interim repair measure. He stated this has occurred in the past and the estimated cost for repair of the panel is $1,000.00. I . Raddatz explained each time a storm occurs the panel has been damaged and recommended replacement of the panel with one which has new components that are not affected by a power surge rather than repair the old panel. He advised the cost for a new panel would be approximately $3,600.00. Council questioned if'insurance would cover the cost of repair of the panel. Raddatz advised the insurance coverage would include cost of repair, however he was not sure if the overtime costs would be included in the coverage and advised he would check past claims and reseach costs to date for repairs. Moved by Peck, seconded by Winiecki, that Council authorize the expenditure of funds not to exceed $4,000.00 from the Utility Maintenance Budget for a'new control panel at Lift Station #5. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) REPORT OF PARKS DIRECTOR . 1988 FALL PROGRAM & SALARY SCHEDULE Council was referred to the 1988 Fall Program Proposal and Salary Schedule submitted by Park Director Buckley. . Buckley compared the program to the 1987 Fall Program and noted additional programs that would be offered in 1988. He reviewed the 1988 salaries as outlined. . Peck moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve the 1988 Fall Program as outlined and Salary Schedule as submitted. Councilmember Winiecki indicated she preferred the program and salaries be discussed as separate items; she requested discussion of the salaries proposed for the 1988 instructors. Buckley explained the criteria for hiring personnel for program instruction which include; age, skills, experience and training. He advised that consideration is also given to the number of hours of instruction snd the current fees being set by surrounding communities. Council discussed the wage increases proposed for instructors and the salary range set for Baton instruction. Winiecki preferred setting a salary and hiring a Baton instructor at that rate. . Clerk Administrator Berger advised that he had reviewed such proposals and the salary rates and programs are comparable to what other cities are offering; he noted it is typical to increase salaries for repeat instructors. . Winiecki moved to amend the motion, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve the 1988 salaries for instructors at the 1987 salary rates and set the Baton Instructor rate at $8.00 per hour and the Women's Self Defense Seminar instruction at $25.00. Motion carried. (Winiecki and Woodburn voting in favor; Peck opposed) (2-1) Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (3-0) ADD'L PARK MAINT. PERSONNEL Council was referred to a memorandum from Parks Director Buckley dated 8-4-88 recommending hiring three persons to fill part-time summer maintenance crew vacancies. Buckley advised the workers would still fields and complete be set at $5.00 per vacancies were due to summer workers returning to school and be needed thru August and September to cut grass, maintain ball the installation of play equipment. He recommended the salary hour and the three persons start on 8-15-88. . Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve the hiring of three additional park maintenance personnel to replace present summer maintenance crew, effective August 15, 1988 through September 1988. at a salary rate of $5.00 per hour. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) . I . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 . Page 7 STATUS REPORT; ARSENAL PROP. Park Director Buckley advised he had been in contact with surrounding communities relative to the use of the Arsenal property for recreational purposes; he stated he would be communities to prepare a proposal. working with the other REPORT OF ENGINEER AWARD BID; 1988 STREET IMPROVMT. . Council was referred to a letter from Engineer Peters dated 8-8-88 reviewing the bids received for the 1988 Street Improvements. Peters recommended the project be awarded to the low bidder, Bituminous Consulting and Contracting, in the amount of $72,505.53. Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council award the bid for the 1988 Street Improvement Project to Bituminous Consulting and Contracting in the amount of $72,505.53. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) The Engineer stated the bids Were lower then anticipated suggested Council coneider utilizing the remaining budgeted funds for streets identified by the Public Works Supervisor as being in need of repair at the present time. After discussion, Council and Clerk Administrator Berger concurred that additional street repairs would have to be evaluated in light of unexpected expenditures for projects in 1988. OTHER BUSINESS . Councilmember Winiecki recommended Council review the Ordinance regulations relating to satellite antennas; to the recent number of applications and possible technology changes the Ordinance regulations may need to be updated. Council concurred the Planning Consultant could be requested to review the regulations to determine if they should be updated at a future date. . REVIEW ORD.; RE: ANTENNA due REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR DESIGNATE ELECTION JUDGES & POLLING PLACES FOR 1988 Council was referred to a list of Election Judges and Polling Places for the 1988 Primary and General Elections to be held September 13 and November 8, 1988. Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve the 1988 Election Judges and Polling Places for the Primary and General Elections as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) REVIEW CONSULT. AGREEMENT; INSP. MCGINLEY Council was referred to a memorandum from Clerk Administrator Berger dated 8-5-88 relative to the proposal from Charles McGinley for consulting services as rendering plant inspector. . Berger reviewed the proposed fees for service, a memorandum and recommendation from Attorney Lynden, an excerpt from the Council Minutes of June 17, 1988 relative to the proposal and a Council report from Kevin Locke, Community Development Director in the City of New Brighton. Council was referred to the fee schedule for services and Berger noted the total cost for services in the amount of $19,500.00 is proposed to be split by New Brighton and Arden Hills. Councilmembers and Berger expressed concern that the last page of the proposal appears to be "open-ended" and that it does not outline future costs. There was discussion relative to the City Attorney meeting with McGinley to discuss the cost breakdown and to review the extent of Arden Hills involvement; the permitting process; compliance monitoring and cooperating with the City of New Brighton as well as sharing inspection fees. . After discussion, Council concurred Arden Hills was willing to share the $700.00 cost for initial work performed by McGinley and future costs, however they preferred to see a more detailed cost breakdown. Council requested Berger contact New Brighton to inform them of our intent to participate in the resolution of the inspection matter and to request McGinley appear at a future meeting to discuss the services in a more detailed manner. . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 8, 1988 Page 8 . . . traffic patterns and Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated 8-5-88, relative to a Council directive that staff contact Traffic Engineer Glen Van Wormer regarding the review of a signage study update for the City. TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW; SEH Berger explained Van Wormer indicated he was aware of a Cit:y wide study that was done . in 1972; given the changes in traffic patterns and development that has occured in the City, Van Wormer Was of the opinion the study may be too old. The Enaineer advised a new study would cost approximately $1,500.00 Rnd would provide guidance in locating signs to be updated and identifying areas where new signs are needed. I Mayor Woodburn disagreed with Van Wormer and stated the 1972 study may provide background information that would apply to current signage. After discussion, Council concurred that the Clerk Administrator be directed to locate an~ review the old study for information that would provide guidance for the the current traffic and signage situation and how it relates to the current pavement management plan. PROCLAMATION; TOTAL SPRINKLING BAN Council was referred to the revised Sprinkling Ban Proclamation. Berger advised the ban has been effective and there were no enforcement problems to date. Councilmember Peck suggested the revised proclamation include the language that a fine would be imposed for the second and all subsequent violations. . Mayor Woodburn suggested the ban be imposed and lifted in conjunction with the City . of St. Paul and other northern suburbs. )\ ,rw,"(..(.. Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve the , revised Sprinkling Ban Proclamatio~~s submitted and the language include the ban being imposed and lift~ in accord~ance with the City of St. Paul. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) CLAIMS & PAYROLL Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve Claims and Payroll as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) TREASURER REPORT INVESTMENTS Clerk Administrator Berger reported on the following investments: 8/1/88 - $100,000.00 invested in the 4M Fund at' 8.25% to mature 10-31-88. Berger reported that $600,000.00 was invested in the 4M Fund in $100,000.00 increments at interest rates ranging from 8.25 to 8.5% and maturing between 2-6-89 . through 8-4-89. . Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council ratify the Treasurer's report as submitte. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) RECYCLING DISCOUNT Council was advised several calls had been received from residents complaining they were not receiving the 15% discount for recycling. Council suggested Berger contact Paul Malone and request he review the program and determine possible solutions to resolve this matter. ADJOURNMENT Gary R. Berger Clerk Administrator Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the meeting be adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) 0/ i K~-t?~-J~h~ Robert L. Woodburn Mayor . NOTICE OF MEETING . The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, August 29, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall.