HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 05-11-1987
~10
(, it,. It;
. "~I ' : .1__rt_"~I. /-
'" .jr c
".' ,\'t r~J! d,-"
AGENDA' t ! j I~
f \, (l.1
Regular Council Meeting I' _ - I fI LS).L - /"1 <\ d
Vi llage of Arden Hills \ ik'V/- u Q
Monday, May 11, 6:30 P.M. ~\C 'i' . ' /; ),:1' If
Village Hall 1-/ ,j-, /' "J,,,
/ "'.',': /,;.,;t'
('.I \\ '
1. Call to Order and Roll Call \.. '
2. Closed Meeting, Pending Litigation - 6:30 to 7:00 p.m.
3. Closed Meeting, Labor Negotiations - 7:00 to 7:30 p,m.
,,^r1~
~N'ge~ 4. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987,
Special Council Meeting of April 29, 1987, and Special Council Meeting
of May 7, 1987.
-0 ~ 5. Business from the Floor
-~~' Puhlic U"..dngs I?~~~, <A~:> ~- ,
_:~
~ A. J;/C!,se 1187-08, Rezoning, B-2 to 1-2, Scherer Bros. Lumber, 4949 ~
-, Highway 10 5-0
~...
~ ,
.
\/1
B. \Case #87-14, Rezoning, 1-2 to B-2, C. G. Rein, Lexington Avenue-
~~- North of Grey Fox Road. 5'-0
~ 7. Planning Commission Actions
_~.!.:..\'\case 1187-10, Front Setback Variance, 1305 Tiller Lane (Schull)
B. Case #87-11, Minor Subdivision and Lot Width Variance, Lot 1,
____~, v Blk. 4, Shady Oaks Addition (Tramm)
C. Case #87-12, Front Setback Variance, Lot North of Lake Johanna
(Mark Anderson)
lS.
D. ~\Case #87-~ Amended Site Plan Review and Rear Setback Variance,
~4251 Fernwood Avenue, Alpo Pet Foojis, Inc,' '\ ~~"
8. Parks and Recreation Director Report L_-I-V-';"~:t.P1;... ~'t:y \',t:
'Y' I" '"."' :. ~. 4 & . MU. ,dS/:>.b ~'1'
A. Summer Program Proposal
- ~
1 B. Approval, Hiring of Playground Employees
_"0, ____,(i:J;j:::,{L-,.on
9. Public Works Supervisor Report
~, A. Construction Projects Update fi~ - CL~~'r-.
-----
G.fi/d B. Pavement Management Plan ., { ,A'/l
. 10. Finance Committee Report t;(O,,/j 'I (f, ~
, ,~~'~ A. _ Licenses and Permits ./ ' J~~ .~_ J ,
e0~6(~1o B. _~tility Rates Recommendation --- fi ~ t/vo---'
..-----11'. Other Business
12. Report of Clerk Administrator Patricia J. Morrison
--~~o___ Approval of FoJ{iign DJsb~{~tl~~ (Public Works Department)
~~~ ,I~g;a' Development of Long Range Fire Protection Plan ~
~,~-, ~. \~ \l~
o ff'~ C. Evaluation of Clerk Administrator;:;;-. \
, i D. Snowmobile Ordinance; Final Draft- f~ \\~~;;- (:2
(o7Jfi' , ,
- , r
~/Y))E. Retail Sales License - Lake Johanna ConceSSlon Stand
,^\vf F. Claims and Payroll
13. Adjournment
, MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 1987, 6:30 p.m. - Village Hall
. CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn
called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were
present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy
Hansen. Gary Peck, Thomas Sather and Jeanne Winiecki. Also Present: Planner
Or1yn Miller Miller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Parks Director John Buckley, Public
Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk Administrator Patricia Morrison and
Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago.
CLOSED MEETINGS Council discussed pending litigation between 6:30 and
PENDING LITIGATION 7:00 p.m.,and discussed labor negotiations from 7:00 to
& LABOR NEGOTIATIONS to 7:30 p.m.
APPROVE TASK Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that the Council
INVENTORIES hereby approves and accepts, as submitted, the Task
Inventories for the positions of Public Works
Maintenance I and Maintenance II employees; and, further, that the Council
recommends that the Task Inventories be utilized for the creation of Position
Descriptions for Public Works Maintenance I and Maintenance II positions.
Motion catried. (Hansen, Peck, Sather, Winiecki voting in favor; Woodburn
opposed) (4-1)
APPROVE MINUTES Council recommended the following corrections to the
April 27th and April 29th Council minutes:
--
April 27th: Page 4 - Correct spelling of Ken We1tzen's name.
-- Page 8 - Change motion on Fire Station 114 to read: "that the Arden
Hills Council withdraw from the Contract.... "
.
April 29th: Page 1 - Vote on Motion to reconsider withdrawal from the Joint
Powers Agreement should be 5-0, rather than 4-1.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 27, and the Special Council
Meetings of April 29 and May 7, 1987, as corrected. Motion carried unanimously.
(5-0)
BUSINESS FROM FLOOR None.
CASE NO. 87-08; Council was referred to Planner's memorandum of 4/10/87
REZONING B-2 to I-2 relative to the request for Rezoning of the property
SCHERER LUMBER located at 4947 Highway 10, Scherer Bros. Lumber.
Miller advised Council that under current zoning, the existing lumberyard is a
non-conforming use. He stated the applicant's reasons for requesting the
rezoning were to allow the continued operation, upgrading and expansion of the
lumberyard, and to bring the current use into conformance.
Council was advised that the Planning Commission had held a public hearing and
no one spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning. Miller referred Council to
the Planning Commission minutes of 5/6/87, recommending approval of the
rezoning, based on the following: l. Rezoning will accommodate upgrading of the
- existing use, which is desirable: 2. The site is relatively isolated.
- surrounded on three sides by major arterials and 3, The land across Highways lO
and 35W is zoned and developed industrially.
~ Larry Leitshuh of Scherer Lumber was present to answer any Council inquiries.
~ Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
Case No. 87-08, Rezoning from B-2 to 1-2, 4947 Highway 10, Scherer Brothers
Lumber Company. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-14; Council was referred to Planner's memorandum, 4-29-87,
REZONING I-2 to B-2 rela~ive to the requested rezoning of a 2.5-acre parcel
C. G. REIN COMPANY north of St. Paul Metalcraft on Lexington Avenue.
The Planner stated that the applicant is planning to construct a facility that
will be smaller in scale but similar to Shannon Square on Lexington Avenue.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as industrial and the site is
currently zoned I-2, a district which does not permit retail uses.
Council was advised the Planning Commission held a hearing, at which time there
was no public response. Miller referred Council to the Planning Commission
minutes (5/6/87), recommending approval. Commission members discussed the
following items in support of the proposed rezoning: l. Nature of new
development along Lexington Avenue, both in Arden Hills and Shoreview, is
retail oriented, 2. The B-2 uses which already exist at Red Fox Road and
Lexington, and 3. The less desirable uses which are permitted under I-2.
. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May 11, 1987
Page 2
. C.G. REIN (CONT'D) Miller also noted the following items opposing the
proposed rezoning: 1. Increased traffic along Lexington
Ave., 2. Commercial strip appearance, and 3. Some undesirable uses permitted in
the B-2 district. Miller advised that some of the less desirable uses in the
B-2 district were permitted by special use permit, allowing some control to be
maintained by the Village, and reminded Council that site plan review would be
required.
The Planner stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the
rezoning, based on the fact that the proposed rezoning would not be
incompatible with other development along Lexington Avenue.
William Sikora, architect for C. G. Rein, was present and reviewed the
comprehensive plan statement submitted with the application. ,He advised the
area can support development of this nature and there would be a combination of
service/small retail use in the proposed facility.
Counci1member Hansen asked Sikora for information which supported the need for
this type of facility.
Dennis Cavanaugh, President of C. G. Rein, stated the Arden Plaza Shopping
Center is owned and managed by C. G. Rein and has had a 2% vacancy rate over
the last 14 years. He further stated that the Shannon Square facility, on
Lexington Avenue, is 70% occupied, and it is his opinion there is a demand for
this type of facility.
--
- Sikora stated that there are no gasoline pumps proposed for this facility; the
stores would be more service oriented.
Council also discussed the difference between this rezoning request and the
proposed rezoning for Ham1ine Avenue and Highway 96; noted this site is not
directly adjacent to residential zoning and the location on Lexington Ave.is
not incompatible with the surrounding industrial zoning.
Miller commented that Planning Commission members had discussed the increased
traffic along Lexington Avenue and he noted that this type of facility will
generate more traffic, however, traffic would be distributed throughout the day
having less impact than concentration at peak hours.
Council discussed the definitions of fast-food restaurants versus drive-in
business, the separation requirement and also, the possible need for further
definition of these uses in the zoning ordinance.
Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
Case No. 87-14, Rezoning from 1-2 to B-2, the Lexington Avenue Colestock site,
North of Grey Fox Road, C. G. Rein Company. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-11; Council was referred to Planner's report 4-10-87,
MINOR SUBD. /VAR. Planning Commission minutes of 5-6-87, and Board of
TRAMM, OAK AVENUE Appeals minutes 4-23-87.
The Planner explained the subject property is an odd-shaped parcel
.... approximately l.l acres in area. He noted that although the parcel exceeds area
requirements, the front lot line width is only 75 ft. and a width variance of
- 20 feet is being requested in conjunction with the minor subdivision.
Miller explained the primary issue with this proposal is the impact of
.... development of the lot on adjacent property. The house to the south has an
-- adequate setback and is partially screened by mature shrubs along the shared
property line. He identified the building envelope and the steepness of the
slope on the front portion on the lot. He indicated the lot will require
special treatment to achieve an acceptable driveway grade, and the applicant is
working on a house plan which includes a tuck-under garage to reduce the
driveway slope.
Miller reviewed the Planning commission recommendation for approval, subject to
the establishment of a minimum setback to be determined by the adjacent homes.
Hansen moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council
approve Case No. 87-11, Minor Subdivision and Lot Width Variance, Lot 1, Block
4 of Shady Oaks Addition, based on the large lot area compensating for the
narrow frontage, the flexible building envelope that exists on the proposed
lot, and there would be no negative impact on the adjacent properties;
furthermore, approval is subject to the front setback line of the proposed home
not exceeding the front setback line of the two adjacent homes (the line drawn
between the two adjacent homes at their closest point t~ th~ir front). Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
---------
-
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May 11, 1987
Page 3
. CASE NO. 87-12; Council was referred to Planner's report (4-10-87),
FRONT SETBACK Planning Commission minutes (5-6-87) and Board of
VAR., ANDERSON Appeals minutes (4-23-87).
Miller reviewed the background of the Minor Subdivision of this parcel,
approved by Council in December 1986. The parcel does not have public street
frontage and is accessed by private easement.
The Planner identified the steep slope at the rear of the Anderson lot and
noted that if the applicant maintains the 40 ft. front setback, the rear of the
proposed house will be at the base of the slope. The applicant has applied for
a 20 ft. variance, to avoid drainage problems and to create a more usable rear
yard.
Council was referred to a letter from Engineer Barry Peters (4-22-87), stating
he has reviewed the request and is comfortable with the variance as proposed.
Peters asked the Planner to relate to the Council that the letter should not be
considered as a recommendation for or against approval of the requested
variance,
Miller explained that the property is very isolated from Lake Johanna Blvd. and
the two adjacent homes south of the parcel are setback approximately 10-15 ft.
from the access easement, which already establishes a lesser setback.
Futhermore, Miller advised that at the time Council approved the subdivision of
.- these two parcels, he had commented that the lots would be buildable without
---- variances, however, the applicant has chosen to request the variance to create
a more usable rear yard and to cause less disruption to the rear slope of the
property.
Council discussed if the property owners to the south of the parcel would be
affected by drainage problems,
Clerk Aministrator adVised that any improvements of the access easement must be
approved by the Engineer.
Planner commented that approval of the requested variance would not relieve the
property owner of his responsibility not to create further drainage problems,
as stipulated in the conditions of approval of the minor subdivision.
There was discussion relative to construction of the home on the parcel without
the requested variance.
Mark Anderson, applicant, adVised that an architect designed the home so that
it would not create further drainage problems for the adjacent properties to
the south. Anderson advised he is working with the Barry Peters on the
improvement of the access easement and has discussed the creation of a culvert
to divert water from the southerly lots. He noted that all the conditions
stipulated in the minor subdivision approval have been accomplished, with the
exception of the access easement improvement.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council
approve Case No. 87-12; Front Setback Variance, on the basis of the hardship
.... imposed by the steep rear slope of the land, the parcel is located on a private
... roadway that is isolated from the main street, and that other homes south of
this site are not in compliance with current setback requirements. Motion
carried. (Hansen, Sather, Peck, Winiecki voting in favor, Woodburn opposed)
- (4-l)
-- CASE NO. 87-15; Planner Miller reviewed his report of 4-29-87, and
SITE PLAN REVIEW referred Council to Planning Commission minutes of
& VAR, ALPO FOODS 5-6-87.
The Planner stated the lot is currently zoned I-l and adjacent to a residential
development, therefore, a 75 ft. setback is required. Since the Planning
CommiSSion meeting he had discovered a zoning map, which was in effect prior to
the State releasing the land proposed for Highway 51, that shows the boundary
line for the zoning district along the rear property line for Alpo Pet Foods.
After discussion with the Zoning Administrator, it was determined that Alpo had
not acquired any of the land released by the State and, therefore a variance
was necessary,
Miller pointed out that since the variance was identified after the Board of
Appeals held their meeting, Council may consider referring the variance to the
Board of Appeals for review and recommendation back to Council.
-
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May 11, 1987
Page 4
. ALPO (CONT'D) The Planner explained the proposed construction of the
addition to the A1po building, which will house a tank
for storage of liquid tallow. The applicant had advised Miller that the tank
will be sealed and should not emit any additional odor.
Council discussed neighborhood complaints relative to odor emission; the Zoning
Administrator Iago had received one complaint prior to the Planning meeting and
the Mrs. Zehm, former Zoning Administrator had indicated she received several
complaints over the years she was employed.
There was also discussion of screeening at the northwest border of the property
and the Parks Director explained that A1po personnel had planted 30-50 trees
along that property line on Arbor Day. Buckley noted that the evergreens were
planted in double rows and should mature within a few years.
Council had questions relative to the processing and storage of the liquid
tallow and determined they needed more information from a company
representative.
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council table Case
No. 87-15, to the next regular Council meeting on May 26, 1987, and refer the
variance request to the Board of Appeals for their review and recommendation;
furthermore, Council requested a representative of Alpo Pet Foods be contacted
by staff and requested to appear before the Council at their May 26th meeting
to discuss the methods of tallow processing and storage, odor emission from the
plant and screening at the rear property line. Motion carried. (5-0)
--
-- CASE NO. 87-10; Planner Miller reviewed his report and referred Council
SETBACK VAR. , to Planning Commission minutes of 5-6-87 and Board of
1305 TILLER LN. Appeals minutes of 4-23-87. Planning Commission and
Board of Appeals recommended denial of the request,
based on the inability of both boards to identify a hardship and approval of
the request may establish a new setback line by precident.
Miller explained the interior floor plan of the home, problems with roof lines
in the rear of the home, and eagerness to eliminate the steep driveway prompted
the applicant to consider the expansion from the front of the home rather than
the rear.
Council was referred to the Planning Commission minutes of May 6, which listed
the reasons for the applicant's request.
After discussion, Council suggested the applicant be encouraged to remOve the
two condemned fireplaces in the home and lower the driveway elevation, for
their safety, even if approval is not granted.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council deny
Case No. 87-10; Front Setback Variance, 1305 Tiller Lane, rationale for denial
being there is no unique identifiable hardship, granted the variance may
establish a new setback line by precident and other options for expansion could
be explored by the applicant. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
REPORT OF PARKS DIRECTOR
- 1987 SUMMER PROGRAM Council was referred to the 1987 Proposed Summer
-- Program Schedule submitted by Buckley.
Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve
the 1987 Summer Program Proposal as submitted by Parks Director John Buckley.
- Motion carried unanimously. (5-0 )
-
APPROVE 1987 SUMMER Council was referred to Buckley's memorandum (5-6-87),
PLAYGROUND PERSONNEL relative to hiring 1987 Summer Playground personnel.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
the 1987 Summer Playground personnel, as outlined in the Parks Director's
memorandum. Motion carried ~nanimously. (5-0)
PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR REPORT
CONSTRUCTION Public Works Supervisor Raddatz reported on the current
PROJECTS UPDATE construction projects in Arden Hills:
SEWER INTERCEPTOR - The sewer pipe is constructed to the cul-de-sac
for Edgewater as of this date. Some valves will have to be repo1aced and the
contractor is placing pearock around the pipe as bedding, The project is ahead
of schedule at this time. Some of the equipment from Lift Station #10 will be
placed in other lift stations for use; Raddatz suggested the items the Vi1a1ge
does not use could be donated to a Vo-Tech school for training purposes.
- ------ - _u__ -.-.-- ------- -
-
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May ll, 1987
Page 5
. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS UPDATE (CONT'D)
ROYAL HILLS - The wear course is ready to be placed on the road at
this time. The storm drains have to be cleaned out and the manholes aligned;
the work should be completed in a month.
GLENVIEW AVENUE - The storm sewer project on G1enview started this
date. A curb service for water was damaged and had to be repaired before they
could continue the project.
NORTHWOODS DRIVE; OPUS BUILDING - The only items remaining are the
placement of the wear course of blacktop and some work on the pond. John Lee of
SEH and Raddatz inspected the project and compiled a list of clean-up items;
upon notice of completion of the list, a reinspect ion will be done.
HAMLINE AVENUE - The landscaping, trees and schurbs, are in place.
Sodding and the wear course of blacktop need to be completed, The contractor
advised that they must wait 7 days before they can stripe the road; due to the
oil in the blacktop. Raddatz discussed possible traffic problems with Deputy
Herbst and they will try to minimize traffic problems during the 7 day period.
KEITHSON DRIVE - All the utilities are in place, as well as gravel and
curb and gutter. The blacktop will be completed sometime in August. Raddatz has
had discussions with a representative from the State Hwy, Dept., regarding the
right hand turn lane onto Hwy. 96. Council discussed the issuance of an
- occupancy permit before a hardtop surface is placed on Keithson. Raddatz stated
~ there is 2 ft. of sand under the road and with the gravel there may not be
problems (potholes, etc.) Sather questioned that the road would be under
Village jurisdiction as it is being constructed by the developer. Council
requested the Clerk Administrator review past policy on the issuance of
occupancy permits prior to hardtop surfaces in residential areas.
WATER TOWER - There are six sections of the water tower now in place.
The bowl section will be welded after two inspections have been made. The
inspections are done by two different persons, with an x-ray machine. The
condensation ceiling is also being installed. The tower will be 141 ft. to the
1,000,000 gallon mark; 150 ft. to the top. When the tower is completed, the
Village will landscape and plant tress around the base; evergreens, hardwoods
and sod. The project. thus far, is on schedule. Councilmember Winiecki asked if
the landscaping removed from the Lift Station #10 could be replanted at the
water tower. Raddatz advised personnel has moved some Op1antings and will
continue as both projects progress.
MUD JACKING CURBS - The mud jacking is completed. The work will be
checked in the fall to determine if it has stayed in place.
REPLACEMENT OF ALARM BOARD - The transistors on the circuit board that
control the pumps and alarms for the lift stations were damaged by a power
surge. A proper sisna1 from the tower was not received and cauaed the tower to
flood; the pumps would not shut down. Raddatz replaced the board with a spare
and repaired the damaged board.
PAVEMENT MGMT. PLAN Council was referred to Raddatz's memorandum, 5-7-87,
... requesting authorization for SEH and Raddatz to begin
.. the Pavement Management study. He advised that $10,000.00 had been budgeted in
the Street portion of the budget. under Engineerins Fees, for this project.
Council requested that SEH compile a cost breakdown of project project costs
- for use in compiling the 1988 budget.
.....
Sather moved. seconded by Peck, that Council authorize
the Public Works Supervisor and Short Elliot Hendrickson to begin the Pavement
Management Study. Motion carried unanimously: (5-0)
LIC & PERMIT FEES Council was referred to Finance Committee minutes of
April 23rd, relative to the subcommittee
recommendations for increasing license and permit fees. The Committee had
recommended that the fees be reviewed every two years. A survey of five
surrounding communities was completed, in an effort to maintain equity, and
also the Committee determined the fees should more closely reflect the costs of
regulation and administration of the licenses and permits.
Councilmember WIniecki suggested the permit fee for the rendering plant be
increased from $600 to $630, to cover the cost of inspection of the plant.
Mayor Woodburn noted that the General Contractors, Excavators, Plumbing and
Contractors license fees would require an Ordinance amendment; suggested the
Attorney be requested to draft the amendment.
----.-
_.--..,-
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May 11, 1987
Page 6
. FEES (CONT'D) Councilmember Sather questioned the fees for restaurant
and cafe licenses, as there are not health inspections
provided. The Clerk Administrator advised that the fee covers the
administrative costs for issuing the license; when a health complaint is
received by the Village, the appropriate State agency is called for an
inspection and may request Dr. Dunn, our health inspector, also inspect the
premises.
Counci1member Peck commented that the proposed increases in the contractors and
rubbish haulers licenses will more than likely be passed onto the residents of
the Village. He questioned why the dog licenses were not issued on a life-time
bas is .
Mayor Woodburn explained that a rabies vaccination is required every two years
and proof of vaccination must be shown when renewing the dog license.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Woodburn, that Council
approve the proposed permit and license fee increases, excluding the
Excavators, Plumbers and Contractors, as outlined in the Finance Committee
minutes of 4-23-87.
Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that the motion be
amended to include the Rendering Plant permit fee increase from $600.00 to
$630.00, to cover inspection costs.
- Amendment to motion carried. (5-0)
-
Original motion as amended carried. (5-0)
Council requested the Clerk Administrator contact the Attorney to determine if
the Rendering Plant fee increase requires an Ordinance amendment.
CONTRACTORS LICENSE Clerk Administrator Morrison inquired if Council
concurred with her suggestion to request the Attorney
to draft an Ordinance revision to include licensing of General Contractors,
Excavators and Plumbers; she offered to work with Lynden to draft the revision
for the next regular Council meeting.
Council commented that Plumbers and Electricians are licensed by the State and
would be excluded.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council directs
the Clerk Administrator and Attorney to review current fees and draft an
Ordinance revision relative to General Contractors. Excavators, Plumbers,
Heating Contractors, and Rubbish Haulers licenses. Motion carried. (5-0)
UTILITY RATE Council was referred to Finance Committee minutes
INCREASE 4-23-87, relative to increasing utility rates. The last
increase for sewer utility was in 1981 and the
Committee recommends a 15% increase, effective July 1st; this increase is
expected to cover costs through 1989.
Council discussed the charges for sewer utility to non-profit organizations.
- Morrison adVised the Attorney informed her the Village cannot charge a higher
., fee to non-profit organizations nor a lower fee.
Council questioned the formula for commercial accounts and the reference to
sewer utility rate increases providing a "minimal amount of cushion".
.....
.... After discussion, Council concurred that they would like to clarify the
rcommendations of the Finance Committee and requested a representative of the
Committee be present at the next regular Council meeting of May 26th.
OTHER BUSINESS
PARKING AT MOUNDS Counci1member Peck discussed the parking situation at
VIEW HIGH SCHOOL in the area of Mounds View High School. He suggested
the Clerk Administrator be given authorization to post
the no-parking signs when deemed necessary, rather than review each posting
with the Council.
Council discussed the placement of signs at access roads only; removal of signs
during the summer months.
Morrison advised that Commander Bergeron stated there may be difficulty
prosecuting offenders if the signs are removed and replaced. Mayor Woodburn
noted the prosecuting Attorney saw no problem with prosecuting offenders.
--.--
-'
. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May II, 1987
Page 7
. PARKING (CONT'D) Councimember Hansen commented that she had discussed
the parking situation with the School Board; the
response was that it is a City problem. Council suggested urging residents to
submit a petition to the School Board requesting resolution of the parking
situation.
After discussion, Council consensus was to approval individual street postings
until the end of this year and review the parking situation prior to the
beginning of school next fall.
Peck moved, seconded by Sather, that Council ratify the
posting of no parking signs on Crystal Avenue and Del1view. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
OTHER BUSINESS
TOUR OF NSP FACILITY Counci1member Hansen reported that the RCLLG meeting
tour of the NSP Plant in Newport was well attended by
representatives from Arden Hills and was very interesting and informative.
RESIGNATION; ZEHM Counci1member Hansen thanked Steve Zehm for his years
of service as a part-time employee. Clerk Administrator
advised Council that a Public Works employee had expressed an interest in the
custodial position; Council instructed Morrison to review the Union contract
for any conflicts.
-
PROPOSED SERVICE Council discussed the informational memorandum from
- FEES INCREASE Clerk Administrator regarding an increase in fees for
services provided by the Village; i.e., copies of
Council and Planning minutes, assessment searches. Code Books, etc.
Council suggested the clarification be included, such as "annual fee" or
"postage included", on the final draft. Council questioned if copies would
still be provided free of charge to County Board Chairman, Ramsey County
Sheriffs Department, etc., and if the increase reflects what surrounding
communities charge. Morrison stated the copies would still be provided free of
charge to persons connected with the operation of the Village; she noted the
fees reflect what metro area communities are charging for these services.
Hansen moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council accept
the miscellaneous fee increase, effective July 1, 1987, as proposed by the
Clerk Administrator in her informational memorandum (5-8-87). Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
DRAINAGE PROBLEM Mayor Woodburn referred Council to a letter dated
1270 WYNRIDGE 5-7-87, relative to the drainage problem on Wynridge
caused by improper grading.
Clerk Administrator commented that she has discussed the matter with the
Building Inspector who advised the owner of the property has the necessary
equipment to correct the problem; Squires has contacted the owner and stated he
would check the area to determine if the grading has been corrected.
..... Morrison suggested sending a certified letter to the owner defining what needs
... to be done and setting a date for completion of the project.
Council discussed what the basis for enforcement would be and recommended
Morrison review the matter with the Attorney, Building Inspector and Public
..... Works Supervisor to determine responsibility for correction of the problem.
...
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE Mayor Woodburn referred Council to a letter regarding
a hedge on Karth Lake Circle and Hamline Ave., which
hinders motorists visibility; also mentioned was the poor striping on Ham1ine
Ave. Council instructed the Public Works Supervisor to review both items and
report to Council.
MSA FUNDS; SNELLING Mayor Woodburn advised the Village has been rejected
for MSA Funds for Old Snelling Avenue, however, the
Engineer is still pursuing this matter.
---
-
- Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, May 11, 1987
Page 8
. REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR
LONG RANGE FIRE Council was polled for consensus on when to begin
PROTECTION PLAN discussions of a long range fire protection plan.
Counci1members commented that this matter should be held pending contract
settlement with LJVFD and discussions with Shoreview and North Oaks are
concluded. There was discussion regarding the appointment of a Committee, and
if inquiries should be made for available land for a proposed station in Arden
Hills.
Council consensus was to hold discussion of this matter until fire contracts
have been settled.
PERMANMENT APPTMT. The Clerk Administrator advised she would complete her
CLERK ADMINISTRATOR six-month probationary period on May 24th and would
welcome the opportunity to meet with the full Council,
prior to that date, to receive their input and evaluation of her job
performance.
Council agreed on a meeting date of Thursday, May 14, 7:00 a.m., at Charlie
Chung's Restaurant and requested Morrison make appropriate notification to the
news media. Council discussed a salary increase; consensus was that the salary
discussion be held until the Union contract was settled.
~ Peck, moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve
the appointment of Patricia Morrison to permanent full-time status, upon
- completion of her six-month probationary period on May 24, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
FINAL READING; Council reviewed the final draft of the Ordinance
ORD. NO. 87- and recommended the following changes;
Page 4 - Sec. 26-42 - Proximity to Residences
Change the word Snowmobile to "Recreational Motor Vehicle" and delete the
entire paragraph beginning with the work "except" in the fourth sentence.
Page 5 - Sec. 26-49 - Mandatory Pennant for Snowmobile
Change the word Snowmobile to "Recreational Motor Vehicle".
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council waive
second reading and approve ORDINANCE NO. 87-245, AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER
26 OF THE ARDEN HILLS CODE BY INCREASING PURVIEW THEREOF TO ENCOMPASS
RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES, REORGANIZING SAID ARTICLE, AND ADDING A SECTION
REQUIRING MANDATORY PENNANTS FOR SNOWMOBILES, as corrected. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
CONCESSION STAND Hansen moved, seconded by Peck to approve the license
LICENSE; SUMMER for the Arden Hills Sportmen's Club, for a concession
stand at Lake Johanna, as aubmitted. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
ADJOURNMENT Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that the meeting be
... adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Motion carried. (5-0)
..
Patricia J. Morrison Robert L. Woodburn
Clerk Administrator Mayor
....
.. NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next regular Council meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 26, 1987, at 7;00
p.m., at the Village Hall.
~-
_._------~---------------------------~~------~~~--
.'
"
./
./?J bl / / I f7
1.C~~,~ '
~: 1/?-( ~
'1/?-- 7 fer ?'
~7. 1/?- ? C 5-0)
n.Sc~ f'l\-;J~ ~lfu..Q..n-o\?' B?-J::::J...
"67-0<( ;}......& Q...Q,~t.... '5'/0
. B. C,G,~ <67-/C; -t.:ltbB:J,
~S~o-./~ C~(r?to..,t.G,r(~ ') -;;l~a&..est're.
(\-j~" &'<I.<ft~~& )csv--e.OYt--\j ..J~\~ ~'t)
IV\. - :?;O-.~ S-
j.~ _ rgeclc -0
(jjA-. S 7 - / ()
"- Tvt~
B, 'i;7-I/ d- S / 'l!R-u.1hI'-cJl JLQ 8 f.1.Sk, (; cQ ;
/Y)-~ L..cft- W,'d, n U <>-L L I ( B lj
-?-~-UJ~ b~,^,,-r.('. ~C<;; cfY
,/l~ 'u},U yJi u;- u
~ e--z/ C 7J ~
['-f '2J-.-! ~.{J~ ~
. Q&iCL ~k~ ,,(t'6Iw--j
Q. -<67-/~ p~ W\AttJL~l
M - ~ 1vuxUJo/ ~; ~ e~~ d.ff.
j""&_~<l-.~ 1(JJJ~ .~.~~
J .
~ pi ~ ~ ~-z/c-~ y-ft-'.
v-'" _~# ,
~~j 1-1 CB.lU.u..~ iA A\cUl~~ 1 ~
.~~
~JrcA- ~~ ~y'~ lIfL.I-'YY\~
. ~' ~~ itcd ~ L, /tdJ{}' f) "L-r (l
f) / /
Bd. U~ 'f.1.e. // -z/. &- 'f A~vJ--
) k~i ~>c-M~ ~ { 6,
t. '67-1 ~ ~o Vi\-~c1s !5(~~/~(~
~', t;;rc-~'
, T~lIs ~
-~-
D (ccW:' { ) ,J-J./ ('0- ~ 0:Y- j f'~, 'J c./( ~
~/ ~ u~(@/CD t:f- )/7 a
50' ~&. ,;-) ; i~ ~-.-/~AS'(OJ~I (Olj,
~~~a--&l~N~,
~ : 4;;) ----0--; ~ ~I L--
~~It-4-sL~&.lJ.J(C . j~-'l.'Letc
o+.~ ~ .-; C ~( / {~ ~(})tJ,,,
v' ~ &1. 4 ~ - ea~k7X<E S/;;).(; -.
. flA~
fJ ~ Qf?~
7A 8'7 -/0 { :':>0 -5 Tl..Uls.,Jli' a~. @~~ 5"-0
~? 3%~' Arttd.J<-
?
<fI I' 2-. <.0 I , .
~, 3 r~ JI-o-w Ail..J. 5~ U~.
f' ~ ~ ~ cfsiA l ~/h:!'
L-L-, /~~'. /h ~/~~
. /. 5
--z/ ~ oV' / p,(l.j r:Y ~ ~ 'I- eld. ({ ~ 0
v-p( I ~ -!1l}J.iJ i-o/ "-
L....- .. ~ wrfu.l. M...Gu~ >
~ ' ~ u-J~~~ (~~~
~:,~~:Peck
. gA, ~u.ln.lYM",5:Qflo ~ IJ.-1rv Ar-rr. M: f.,l~ v', ~~ 5(0
5/0
'~ (~ ~)~~~ ~(S) LLr..-r 5/ 0
9./<JL,J! ' . ~~
~\~~~ '~
/v , ~,,/' '. ~ . , I1U1J-.Q.. c.,;. ~ cr.v i
. // - " . -PthJi-Q(hL~~'
.G.~<{,tT;;;:<t.Jl~ ~ Qaci:t-~().tJ 4;/<( ~~ f~
I C;; t;,-p Of- . IflJiWs-o
11~~~
, ~
q (B) SzlJ<>t- e,r(. =-~tr~~
W(Q~ ~W~, $rOrOOo-t;-
~~ )
N-.-.. ~~ ~'l:-f+<:l.BR h P~'S~i-.
~'L Q~ 07/ ~ =- ~ t.0~ -
ro'fL ftUU--z~~~7
.E ~~&AiL lOt ~()<;;'{s:t
~~( p~
~, f(UL-,~ ~., @c",~6~o- iL[~
~ c~ it't (J{)
L M:~ cL,~~~
0', \jj~
~,~' ll<~
~i~ 5-0 ~~
~:..-/
or- ". C~d:
.., /'., ", rzp- t/ 'Jt
(.......~LAt ~: 6L&'~
. '~. I"~
tf\~.,;J~ 'rnL<\-;l~~
~e. Ol&. ~
~R~ '5
~f2~&~ I?f(~ ~
lJJcD:L-A0 W~
. 'S/~~ ~ l\~ ~ In~ ~G~ ~ c~
~,~
-------
'" .~!r~~ ~~ !- pc> (\?l~
t}- of uY' --7
~
1>
~irVfJ-~. ~ IY\ . it~.
'?t/ fLl?, /~ '
~ ~C:- -? .
~/~p~~, ~~
~ V0~ !JcU. ~
\, fiA~: ~ ~oc;1-\J~~izJ
~~ ~ ~1C-(J~
, . 0/0
~.~
~
/4J~,~~ ~ 7/I/f/
~ Co~1-
c1.0q;1- ~
rn-. M ~0~
~, ,
L
'5/0
~-
fk~' ~ LU ' ~ (!}i UJ I
~~. 70 '1~ '. =
.V
6~~~/~~ :~~~!u.-t
~~. //~ ~.
~~r\~~"
~0- lv~ "-"-"L ~ ~pa) 1
. ~'J U ~T /~ - CZ-;-Jfr!lQy.
~ orv~, (Q..,~ \ )
) ,~
\.. -------- ---
1'1\'. Q,,,~ 0 ~] " ,
'd-~'S~>e;I;/D ~~. "
Yl )5b 0....
/
.
. .
, .
~.~-
/j~ 1). - ~ ' [J:pu.#~
-~ ' ,
-~."-' ---~ ~ W(JL.Q..aJJ.t ~ + C)f?i,
!k',~
/)-~ ~ (i) ..R..cl
wi 5'/6
&-~ U-{~ ~I~
.
.
.
-----
. .
MEMORANDUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
e Date: May 8, 1987
To: Mayor and Council
From: Patricia J. Morrison, Clerk Administrator
Re: Council Agenda Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Items 6 & 7: Planning Commission Cases ~onsidered by the Planning Commission
at their meeting of May 6th. .he minutes of the Planning Commission are
enclosed. All cases have been recommended for approval, with the exception of
the application for Front Yard Setback Variance, 1305 Tiller Lane; a hardship
could not be proven.
Item 8: Parks and Recreation Director Report
A. Summer PlaYRround ProRram: A schedule ~f playground programs is enclosed.
B. Summer PlaYRround Staff: John will be present at the meeting to answer
any questions you may have on his enclosed memo.
Item 9: Public Works Supervisors Report
A. Construction Projects Update: An update of all the construction/improvement
, projects will be discuSS2d Monday night.
B. Pavement ManaRement Plan: Bob is requesting authority to proceed with the
Pavement Management Plan - $10,000 was provided (within the General Fund -
Streets) in the 1987 budget for this.purpose.
Item 10: Finance Committee Report A and B. The Finance Committee minutes of the
April 23rd meeting are enclosed, delineating their recommendations to Council.
Item 12: Clerk Administrator Report
A. Position Description: Maintenance Worker I .
On May 4th, j(aren Olsen, Bob Raddatz and I met to format prerequisites for
a position description of a Maintenance Worker I. Councilman Sather and
Karen Olsen have pursued the inclusion of this position in the Public Works
Contract. Enclosed with your packet is a listing of tasks which have been
drawn out of the Questionnaire used during the Comparable Worth Study process.
Karen will refine this, and have available for Monday night's meeting, a
recommended position description for the entry level public works job. From
there we hope to further this process, by drafting a Maintenance II and
Maintenance III (foreman) Position Description.
I have not asked Karen to be present at Monday night's meeting, but Bob and
I will be ready to address any questions you may have.
..
-- -- .-
- - ------- -
. .
.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
May 8, 1987 Page Two
e B. LonR RanRe Fire Protection Plan
Mayor Woodburn has suggested the Council consider having a work
shop session to lok at where we go from here on our fire protection
needs. He would like your thoughts on this. A meeting of this sort
would give us direction and short/long range goals could be set.
C. Evaluation, Clerk Administrator
I started employment with the Village of Arden Hills on November 24,
1986; therefore, my probationary,period ends May 24, 1987. I believe
the Council consideration of probationary status is to be considered
by the Council three weeks before probationary period ends.
I would welcome the opportunity to meet with the full Council for an
evaluation prior to the end of my probationary period.
D. Snowmobile Ordinance
Jim Lynden has drafted a Final draft of the Snowmobile Ordinance, which
is enclosed for your considerationn.
,
.
,
,
~- ." f
MEMORANDUM
e -------~------------4--t--------------------------------------------------
To: May 8, 1987
From: Patricia J. Horrison, Clerk Administrator
Re: Informational Items
--..----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. LexinRton Avenue BridRe: HnDOT has advised that the southeast ramp,
Lexington and 694, will be closed far ten days; and, that the
northeast ramp will be closed (around May 18 or 19) after the
southeast ramp is re-opened. Signs to this effect have been posted
and detour routes set.
2. 1-35 Construction: HnDOT will be working on 1-35 this summer.
Attached for your information is an excerpt of their proposed
construction timetable. Additional information is on file should you
desire it.
3. McGuire's Inn: I was informed by Hal Pollock (Hanager, McGuire's)
last Wednesday (May 6), and subsequently spoke with owner Lou Pazos,
that the Special Operations Investigative Division of the Ramsey
County Sheriff's Office had seized their "Fun 21 Amusement Device" and
detained the dealer, under a warrant process, claiming illegal
I gambling was being conducted on the premises. Mayor Woodburn and I
have followed up on this, and have spoken with the investigative
officers, Commander Bergeron and Attorney Filla about this matter. As
it is still under investigation, all parties involved have requested
all details and information on this be kept confidential. The Hayor
and/or I would be happy to discuss this with you further - on the
phone or before the meeting. (This machine is the one approved by
Council at the meeting of 2/9/87 with McGuire's assurance that no
prizes or monetary compensation was to be exchanged).
4. ParkinR. Mounds View HiRh School: We are still receiving several
calls per week about problems with student par~ing on residential
streets. We have posted Janet Court and Fairview up t Gramsie; we ,
have also posted Crystal, to Dellview. Although Council had not
specifically authorized Crystal, the parking problem was significant.
Dellview now has the same problem.
Bob and I would like to recommend that the Council give approval to
post any street within this general area. We could then proceed with
posting as the situations emerge. We will need to order additional
signs. (Costs for the first 25 signs and posts was $408.81.)
5. BudRet Calendar: Please note a proposed budget calendar, as
recommended by Charlotte, has been submitted with your packet.
.
6. Miscellaneous CharRes: Through review with Shirley and Cathy of some
~ of our current charges for miscellaneous administrative functions, I
am recommending some increases, based an time, overhead and comparable
-
,
. -. "-
costs in other cities. I believe generally in the past charges have
e been instigated without Council approval; however, as some of the
recommendations are higher than usual, I am requesting your input.
7. Janitorial Service: Steve Zehm, who has been cleaning the Village
Hall for several years, has decided to discontinue his service with
the City. An employee in our Public Works Department has expressed
interest in the position; if he does not continue this interest, we
will advertise for a mature person. Steve had been hired to work four
hours each weekend, at $6.95 per hour.
I
...
I ViffaQe o-f AWR/HI ~rRPA
1450 W. HIGHWAY 96. ARDEN HILLS. MINNESOTA 55112 633,5676
May 7, 1987
Mr. Rob Plunkett
Stringer, Courtney and Rohleder
1200 Norwest Center Tower
55 East Fifth St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Rob:
The Council, as per our previous discussion, has set aside
some time for your report on pending litigation cases. We
have scheduled this for Monday, May II, from 6:30 p.m. to
7:00 p.m. If this presents a time conflict for you, please
let me know; otherwise, we look forward to seeing you.
Sincerely,
. Patricia J. Morrison
Clerk Administrator
PJM:sm
.
--------
. MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 27, 1987, 7:30 p.m. - Village Hall
CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn
called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were
present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy
Hansen, Thomas Sather and Jeanne Winiecki. Councilmember Gary Peck arrived at
7:35 p.m, Also present were Attorney James Lynden, Planner Orlyn Miller, Barry
Peters of Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz,
Clerk Administrator Patricia Morrison and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago.
APPROVE MINUTES Moved by Sather, seconded by Winiecki, that Council
approve the Minutes of the April 13, 1987, Regular
Council meeting as submitted, Motion carried unanimously. (4-0)
BUSINESS FROM FLOOR None.
CASE #87-09: TWO VAR. Council was referred to Planning Commission minutes
FRONT/SIDE SETBACKS (4/1/87), recommending approval of the two variances
3290 SANDEEN ROAD as requested. Council also received an extract of the
Board of Appeals minutes of 4/23/87, recommending
approval of the 5 ft. Front Yard Setback Variance and denial of the 5 ft. Side
Yard Setback Variance.
. Planner Miller reviewed the applicant's plans for removing the existing home
and constructing a new home on the property.
Candi McCloskey, applicant, explained that the architect had requested the 5
ft. side yard setback to increase the size of an interior room in the new home.
She further advised that the property has a 10 ft. easement on the south side
that she was not previously aware of.
The Planner noted that the Planning Commission members were very impressed with
the architectural design for the new home on this parcel.
Council discussed the diagonal direction of the land as it extends back to the
lake; it was determined that the side yard variance was not necessary. Council
strongly encouraged the homeowner not to encroach any further, in either
direction, on the side yards.
Council commended the Board of Appeals for their analysis of the site.
Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
the 5 ft. Front Yard Setback Variance, Case No. 87-09, 3290 Sandeen Road, based
on a justifiable hardship of the slope of the land away from the street. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
CASE #87-04: Planner Miller briefly reviewed the rezoning request
REZONING, HWY 96 and referred Council to the Planning Commission minutes
. AND RAMLINE AVE. of 3/4/87. He noted that the applicant's comprehensive
plan statement should be expanded upon; also that the
Planning Commission was favorably impressed with the architectural design of
the proposal, however, they were concerned with the retail uses proposed as
well as the blanket rezoning.
James Stolpestad, co-owner of the property, distributed a letter dated 4/27/87
to the Councilmembers and a petition from residents supporting the proposed
project. He stated that the owners of the property are proposing the "lessor of
two eVils"; his opinion was that an office building would not be as attractive,
could be a higher elevation. Stolpestad advised he recognizes the legitimate
concerns of the neighbors and proposed to file a restrictive covenant against
the land to limit the scope of the B-2 zoning classification. He requested that
the City Attorney and Planner be authorized to work out such an agreement with
the developer,
. Mike Scott, President of Jackson-Scott Associates, reviewed the site plan and
building uses.
Steve Hauge, President of Hauge and Company, reviewed the building design,
building materials and landscape plan. He noted that the roof would be a
"penthouse" design, enclosing the rooftop mechanical equipment. Hauge stated
that they currently anticipate no neon signage and have tried to keep the
buildings in pace with the residential surrounding area.
i
-
----
.
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 2
REZONING (CONT'D) Council concerns and discussion were as follows:
1. Trash containment, 2. Need for this type of center,
and 3. Traffic problems.
Mike Scott advised the proposed trash containment would include two locations,
behind the buildings, and both would be enclosed on two sides. He also stated
that trash could be contained in a locked totally enclosed area, if the
residents in the area would find that more acceptable. Scott noted the
convenience center distributes traffic throughout the day versus a
service-oriented center which concentrates traffic at peak hours.
Diane Phillippi, 1442 Arden View Drive, spoke in opposition to the proposed
rezoning. It was her opinion the center would not blend with the residential
area, did not see a need for the center and was not in favor of the current B-1
zoning of the parcel.
Kathy Brown, 1391 Arden View Drive, referred Council to the petition from area
residents, dated 2/25/87, opposing the rezoning for the following reasons:
1. Uses permitted in B-2 are incompatible with the adjacent residential
areas.
2. Increased Traffic will add to the congestion on the two roads and at .
their intersection.
3. Specific plans are not part of this proposal. A conceptual change by the
current developer or a change of developers could result in usage much
different from that which is implied in the application,
The City Attorney reviewed his letter to the Council (3-30-87), relative to
conditional rezoning. He explained that the City of Arden Hills had not engaged
in the practice of conditional rezoning in the past and suggested the Council
continue this practice. He advised it is justifiable for the Council to uphold
past policy. Lynden noted for Council the uses permitted in the B-2 zoning
district, as well as specially permitted uses and reviewed Council actions that
could be taken at this time.
Vicki Knutson, 1403 Arden View Drive, spoke in opposition; stating concern
relative to: trash confinement, hours of operation for retail stores, youths
congregating, and did not see need for this type of center.
Winiecki questioned the holding pond located on the site,
Steve Hauge explained that approval from Rice Creek Watershed and the State of
Minnesota had been received prior to construction of the holding pond.
Sather advised he had received numerous calls from citizens opposing the
proposed rezoning, however, none had stated what they would like to have
constructed at that location. He stated he would favor the traffic distribution .
throughout the entire day, rather than at peak hours.
Hansen stated the proposed building plan is attractive, however, it was her
opinion there was not a need for this type of center. She also advised she was
uncomfortable with spot rezoning.
Winiecki commented that the developer has shown sensitivity to the neighborhood
with the building design and has tried to address all neighborhood concerns.
Peck noted the building design is attractive and questioned if the area
residents were aware of what could be developed at that location.
Judy Sellers, 1457 Arden View Drive, stated that the school bus stops at
Hamline and Hwy. 96, which would contribute. to the traffic congestion.
Wanda Nelson, 4487 Arden View Court, spoke in favor of the proposed rezoning; .
it was her opinion the building plan is good and she would support it.
Planner Miller, for clarification purposes, advised the Planning Commission
recommendation was for denial of the rezoning with direction given to the
applicant to pursue a PUD concept. He noted the intent was to direct the
applicant to pursue a process that would allow some restrictions which would
maintain control for the City, as well as the residents of the area.
----- ..-
.
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 3
REZONING (CONT'D) Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council deny Case
No. 87-04, Rezoning from B-1 to B-2, Hamline Avenue and
Highway 96, rationale for denial as follows: not proven sufficient need for a
convenience/retail operation in the area, concerned about litter, noise,
increased traffic, level of on-sight activity, type and quality of lighting,
incompatibility with residential area and Arden Hills comprehensive plan: be it
further noted that Council is opposed to the concept of spot zoning and
conditional zoning and has determined that approval may be a precedent setting
action. Motion carried. (Hansen, Peck, Woodburn voting in favor; Winiecki and
Sather opposed) (3-2).
GLENVIEW AVE. Council was referred to Change Order #5, relative to
STORM SEW. RPT. the Glenview Avenue Storm reconstruction being added to
the contract for Edgewater Estates.
Barry Peters reported that C.W. Houle has estimated the construction costs at
$19,980.50. Peters estimate, for an independent project, at an earlier Council
meeting ~as $23,800.00.
Council was advised the Clerk Administrator had suggested the monies could be
. taken from the PIR Fund. There was discussion relative to placing this item in
the 1989 Budget.
Mrs. Caniff, 3946 Glenview Ave., briefly explained the problems she has been
experiencing and stated her opinion is that the problems are caused because of
the small storm sewer placed in the area by the City. She feels it is the
City's responsibility to provide proper drainage and correct the problem.
Councilmember Hansen asked why Caniff's had built their home in the area if
they were aware of the problem.
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council include
the reconstruction of the Glenview Avenue Storm Sewer in the 1988 Budget for
the City of Arden Hills, and that this item be included under the Public Works
Fund or Revolving Fund.
In discussion, Council questioned if there were funds available for the project
this year.
Public Works Supervisor Raddatz advised he and Barry Peters had discussed the
possibility of holding off the seal-coating projects for 1987 until the
Pavement Management Plan results are received. He explained the funds budgeted
for seal-coating in 1987 would be available if Council deems the Glenview
project necessary this year. Council asked if there are any streets in need of
seal coating this year and if the remaining funds would cover the cost of those
streets.
. Raddatz advised there are streets in need of seal coating and the remaining
funds should cover the cost of the project.
Peck moved, seconded by Sather, to amend the motion to
read as follows: that the project for the reconstruction of the Glenview Avenue
Storm Sewer be completed in 1987, with funds to be expended from the 1987 Seal
Coating Budget. Amendment to motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (5-0)
RES. NO. 87-20; Council was referred to the final draft of the Joint
GLENHILL ROAD Powers Agreement with the City of Roseville for the
RECONSTRUCTION Glenhill Road reconstruction, and the resolution
approving plans and specification, ordering
. advertisement for bids and accepting the bid. The memorandum dated 4/22/87
from the Clerk Administrator advised that the Attorney had reviewed the
Agreement, made minor changes and recommended approval.
Moved by Sather, seconded by Winiecki, that Council
approve Resolution No. 87-20, RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, AND ACCEPTING THE BID, and further approve the
final draft of the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Roseville for the
reconstruction of Glenhill Road. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
.
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 4
RES. NO. 87-21; Planner Miller briefly reviewed his investigation of
TAX FORFEITED PROP. the parcel identified as Outlot A, Briarknoll Plat Two,
in the City of Arden Hills. He noted that the property
is basically low-land, used as a drainage area, and the entire parcel is
covered by drainage and utility easements. Rice Creek Watershed recommended the
City retain the easement; they may not have the power to retain such easements.
Miller advised that NSP also retains an easement on one corner of the property.
After discussion, Council consensus was to forfeit the land,
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council
approve Resolution No. 87-21, RESOLUTION RELATING TO FORFEITED LAND AND LAND
CLASSIFICATION. Motion carried unanimously, (5-0)
NORTH SUB. YOUTH Mayor Woodburn introduced David Wilmes, Executive
SERVICES REPORT Director, and George Marks, Board Chairman of the
North Suburban Youth Services Bureau.
Wilmes provided Councilmembers with the activity report from last quarter and
the 1986 Annual Report. He summarized current programs, recent funding problems
and projected goals. Wilmes reviewed the Senior Chore Program, which has .
become a model for other Metro area cities. He stated he is leaving the Youth
Service Bureau with mixed feelings and has enjoyed working with the Village.
George Marks, Board Chairman, thanked the Council for their support of the
Youth Services Bureau and commended former Councilmember Dale Hicks for his
many contributions,
Marks introduced Kay Andrews, who will serve as Wilmes' successor.
Councilmember Hansen suggested that the Bureau continue to expand it's
advertisement of the programs.
REPORT OF CABLE Council was referred to the minutes of the Cable
COMM. CHAIRMAN Committee Meeting (4-9-87).
Chairman Bill Bauer explained the current voting procedures are based on
population (one vote per 5,000 population), and the NSCC is reviewing a
procedure whereby proportionate representation would be based on the number of
subscribers or franchise fees. He stated any change would have little effect on
Arden Hills, since we now have 6.457. of the vote and with proportionate revenue
we would receive 6.397.. Bauer advised that if a change occurs, it will require
Council approval and he asked for Council direction.
After discussion, Council consensus was that the cities that are most impacted
by the change should make the decision.
Bauer advised that the next major issue discussed by the Cable Commission would .
be public access.
REQ. FOR NO PKING. Council was referred to the Public Safety/Works
SO. SIDE CO. RD. E Committee Meeting (4-16-87), re: the request for no
parking on the south side of County Road E, from Lake
Johanna Blvd., to the high voltage power lines.
Councilmember Hansen reported that she had checked the number of parking spaces
with Deputy Herbst and found there were over 200 spaces (not including the boat
trailer parking); at 2 or 3 persons per car there would be 400-600 people using
the beach. She cited swimming safety, safety of persons walking to the beach,
and erosion of the ditches in the area as factors for approving the no parking
request. Ken Lausen at Ramsey County advised he would prefer to have all County
Roads posted no parking. Hansen also discussed with Lausen the concept of .
charging fees for for lake usage; the County advised if the Village wants to
charge fees they can take over the maintenance of the park. In discussions
with New Brighton City Manager, this will be the first year they will charge
for usage of the park; Hansen noted this may increase the number of persons
using Lake Johanna.
Hansen stated the ditch erosion damage is mostly from the high voltage lines to
New Brighton Road and it would be more practical and effective to restrict the
parking past the high voltage lines; also for enforcement purposes.
Hansen moved. seconded by Winiecki, that Council
request Ramsey County to restrict parking on the south side of County Road E
from take Johmma BClIlovard to New Brighton Road. Motion carried unanimously.
(';-0)
.
. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27,
1987
Page 5
Mayor Woodburn and Public Works Supervisor discussed County Road D parking, by
Lake Johanna Park, posting no parking signs early this year before the problems
begin.
CHARITABLE Council was referred to sample Ordinances from various
GAMBL. ORD. communities and the letter from Attorney Lynden
(3-27-87) , relative to enactment of a Charitable
Gambling Ordinance for the Village.
Council discussed if there is a need for an Ordinance, what aspects would be
regulated and guidelines to be given to the Attorney for drafting the
ordinance.
Councilmember Sather noted the State Legislators have rescinded some freedoms
these types of operations are allowed; he asked for items Council proposed for
inclusion in the ordinance.
In discussion, Council cited the following regulatory items for inclusion in
the ordinance:
- Number of Bingo Occasions.
. - Number of Charities operating at a singular facility.
- Hours of Operation.
- Phase Out of the operation over a reasonable time period.
- Percentage of return to Community.
- Limiting perimeters of where Charities are located.
Winiecki suggested the Attorney draft an ordinance including all the above and
then Council could discuss each regulatory item at that time.
Attorney Lynden advised he could meet with the Clerk Administrator and draft an
ordinance for Council review which includes the items mentioned above.
SNOWMOBILE ORD. Mayor Woodburn explained he had discussed with the
Attorney the concerns of the Council, relative to all
terrain vehicles operating in the winter months and definition of where these
vehicles could operate. After discussion it was noted that due to the fact the
ground would be frozen and the vehicles would not damage the parkway; Lynden
also defined "roadway" for the Councilmembers.
After discussion, Council consensus was to include the following items and
language in the revised draft of the Snowmobile Ordinance:
1. Hours of Operation, Sec. 26.42, should be 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., to
make Ordinance more compatible with neighboring cities.
2, Equipment should include a Deadman's Throttle, unless covered by State
law, should be included.
. 3. Exempting use of these vehicles by governmental agencies in pursuit of
their duties or during emergency use in adverse weather.
4. Section 26.25(a) Change language to read "An off-road vehicle", rather
than "A three-wheel vehicle.
CONDEMNATION RPT. The Attorney advised that the property owner's attorney
NAEGELE PROPERTY had requested the hearing, scheduled for February,
be postponed; to date the hearing has not been
rescheduled. Lynden also advised he had talked with the
appraiser. the Mayor and the Engineer; the appraiser is willing to reduce the
amount allocated for the temporary easements if the Engineer determines the
length of time for temporary easements retention could be reduced to 6 months
rather than one year. Barry Peters agreed that the City could reduce the time
of the temporary easement to 6 months.
. Lynden reported that he wou~d contact the property owner's attorney, by the end
of this week, to discuss the possibility of a settlement of this case, for
review by Council.
ASSMT. LETTER Council was referred to letter from Attorney, dated
4/27/87, relative to apportionment of assessment for
Council review, as possible assessment policy for the Round Lake project..
REQ. FOR STREET Council was referred to PS/W Committee meeting minutes
LT. PRIOR/JERROLD (4/16/87) , recommending denial of the request based on
the facts that a light at this junction is not on the
master street lighting plan and the effect of lighting in reducing vandalism
and loitering is questionable,
------~-- -------
. .
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 6
ST. LIGHT (CONT'D) Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council supports
the Public Safety/Works Committee recommendation for
denial of the street light request, at the intersection of Prior and Jerrold,
based on the rationale listed in the Committee Minutes of 4-16-87 and,
furthermore, that Council recommends the residents pursue the option of a
private security light at that location. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
HOUSE NUMBERING Council was referred to PS/W Committee Minutes
(4-16-87) , recommending the preparation of "door
hangers" explaining the importance of visible house numbers and the plan for
distribution of all Arden Hills residents whose homes are inadequately
identified.
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council direct the
Public Safety/Works Conunittee and Administrative staff to prepare the "door
hangers" explaining the importance of visible house numbers. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
FIRE STATION 1/4 Council was referred to PS/W Committee minutes
(4-16-87), relative to the extent of participation with
Shoreview in Fire Station #4. Committee consensus was
that Arden Hills Council consider participating only in the pruchase of an .
aerial truck and consider purchasing a parcel of land in the north end of Arden
Hills (preferably next to the Public Works Building) for use as a future fire
station. It was noted that the Committee determined the purchase of land
essential should Shoreview elect to have its own fire department.
REPORT ON ISO RATING Paul Malone reviewed for Council the effect of ISO
Insurance Ratings on the City insurance premiums. He
explained how he had attempted to determine justification of expenditures for
new equipment, in terms of benefits. Essentially the ISO rating system runs
from one to ten; one being the best rating, ten the worst. He explained how the
point ratings affected commercial properties insurance premiums; noting that
the amount of money saved by decreasing the ISO rating is not substantial.
Malone advised that the ISO rating for the City was originally done in 1975 and
updated in 1980, using the 1975 data and brought into the current rating
system. There are three classification categories, our rating was 6 (49.37
total points). The categories are: 1. Alarms - of a possible 10 pts.; we
received 4 pts., 2. Fire Department - 50 pts. available; we received 19.36.
3. Water - 40 pts, available; we received 34.87.
Malone pointed out that additional points could be gained on improvements that
have already been made since 1975. He advised that he and the Fire Chief were
going to compile a current point rating using up-to-date information.
Council was referred to a diagram which displayed the radius of coverage from
each of the proposed fire station locations. Malone noted the difference in .
coverage for the Village with a centrally located station versus the Island
Lake Site.
Councilmembers conunended Malone on his presentation and thanked him for the
information.
REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR
REQ. WATERMAIN Council was referred to Raddatz's memorandum (4-24-87)
EXTENSION HWY 10 requesting the City extend the watermain on property
owned by him. Raddatz noted that he had discussed the
matter with the Engineer, who would draw up plans, under the City's guidelines,
and inspect the project. The project costs ,would be reimbursed by Raddatz.
Council suggested that Raddatz submit a development agreement for review by the .
City Attorney and return to, Council for final approval.
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
the request for a watermain extension on Old Highway 10, as outlined in the
memorandum from Public Works Supervisor dated 4-24-87, authorize plans and
specifications be drawn, and furthermore, that Raddatz submit a development
agreement for review by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0).
. .
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 7
PURCHASE TRUCK Council was referred to memorandum from Raddatz dated
PUBLIC WORKS 4-27-87, re: payment for truck delivered from Boyer
Ford. Public Works Supervisor noted that the box and
plow will have to be installed.
Hansen moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council
~prove the payment of $33,199.75 for the Public Works Truck. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
REPLACE NO PKING. Councilmember Hansen requested Raddatz replace the no
SIGNS AT LIFT STA. parking signs at lift station on County Road E and
Lake Boulevard.
SELECT ARCHITECT Council was referred to Clerk Administrator's
FOR FIRE STA. #4 memorandum (4-9-87), relative to the selection of the
architect for Fire Station #4.
Hansen moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the Arden
Hills Co~ncil hereby authorizes the architectural firm of BWBR to commence
preparation of the site plan and preliminary sketches for Fire Station #4, in
accordance with the recommendation of the Station 4 Committee, at their meeting
. of 4/4/87.
In discussion, Councilmember Peck asked if Council consensus was for Arden
Hills to continue with the Joint Powers Agreement for Station #4 with
Shoreview. He noted the recommendation in the PS/W Committee minutes of 4/16/87
relative to extent of participation.
Councilmember Hansen suggested Council explore the legal ramifications of
terminating the agreement.
Councilmember Winiecki asked what the financial ramifications of terminating
the agreement would be.
Mayor Woodburn stated it is his opinion there would be not punitive damages
awarded, therefore, the Village could not be sued for anymore money that costs
to date. He suggested a legal opinion be requested from the Attorney.
Winiecki suggested further evaluation may be necessary; noting the fire
coverage radius factor as displayed by Paul Malone's presentation clearly
displayed the need for a more centrally located station.
Hansen explained the location of the station was also determined by
availability of recruitment of firefighters, land availability and an effort to
keep the LJVFD unified. She reported that she has received citizen input
opposing the Island Lake Site.
. Council discussed the proposed size of the station, the apparatus and the
location.
There was discussion relative to budgeting for a Fire Station in Arden Hills,
the current level of fire protection, and level of participation in other
stations,
Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council
temporarily table the motion on the floor, relative to selection of architect
for Fire Station #4, until later this evening. Motion carried unanimously.
(5-0)
JOINT POWERS Council discussed the negotiations for Fire Station #4
AGREEMENT FOR and Council consensus was that a decision should be
FIRE STA. #4 made to continue with the agreement or terminate it.
. Sather noted there is a provision in the the Joint Powers agreement for
withdrawal; suggested this may be the time to withdraw and consider another
plan. He reviewed the history of the joint venture with Shoreview. It was his
opinion that the majority of the Council was uncertain if Arden Hills should
continue in the Joint Powers agreement; he would still support the concept.
Councilmembers Peck and Winiecki agreed. Hansen commented that the PS/W
Committee had recommended remaining in the joint venture; she also expressed
concern relative to maintaining the unity of the LJVFD and recruitment
problems.
. .
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 8
FIRE STA. 114 Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the Arden Hills
(CONT'D) Council terminate the Contract with the City of
Shoreview for Fire Station #4 and negate the Joint
Powers Agreement. Motion carried. (Peck, Winiecki, Woodburn voting in favor;
Hansen and Sather voting in opposition) (3-2)
Mayor Woodburn expressed his opinion that there should be more unanimity among
the Councilmembers. Peck agreed.
Mayor Woodburn recommended Council reconsider the motion.
Peck moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council reconsider
the motion for termination of the Joint Powers Agreement for Fire Station #4
with the City of Shoreview~Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
"",M~fW'
~ Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that the motion for
reconsideration oftt rminatin~ the Joint Powers Agreement for Fire Station #4,
with the City of Shoreview be tabled to the Special Council meeting to be held
on Wednesday, April 29, 1987, at 7:00 a.m., at the Village Hall. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0).
REQ. FOR JOINT MTG. Council consensus was to discuss a tentative date for
WITH NORTH OAKS a joint Council meeting with the City of North Oaks at .
the Special Council meeting on 4/29/87, at 7:00 a.m.,
at the Village Hall. North Oaks had requested a meeting with the Arden Hills
Council.
MAYOR PRO-TEM Mayor Woodburn suggested that the Mayor Pro-Tem
APPOINTMENT appointment be rotated among the Councilmembers; he
recommended Councilmember Hansen serve in the position
for 1987.
Peck moved, seconded by Sather, that Council ratify the
recommendation for Councilmember Hansen to serve as Mayor Pro-Tern for the
remainder of 1987. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
PLAN. COMM./BD. OF Mayor Woodburn recommended Councilmember Winiecki
APPEALS LIAISON assume the duties of Dale Hicks and serve as liaison to
the Planning Commission, Board of Appeals and North
Suburban Youth Services Bureau.
Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council ratify
the recommendation for Councilmember Winiecki to serve as Council liaison for
Planning Commission, Board of Appeals and North Suburban Youth Services Bureau.
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
RES. NO. 87-22 Moved by Peck, seconded by Sather, that Council approve
DESIG. DEPOS. Resolution No. 87-22, RESOLUTION DESIGNATING .
DEPOSITORIES AND CORPORATION AUTHORIZATION. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
SCHEn. CLOSED MTGS. Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve
scheduling a Closed Meeting on May 11, 1987, from 6:30
to 7:00 p.m., for Pending Litigation and from 7:00 to 7:30 p.m, for Labor
Negotiations. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
MAY COUNCIL Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council
MEETING DATE hold the last regular Council meeting in May on Tuesday
May 26, rather than Monday, May 25, due to the Memorial
Day Holiday. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
PLAN, COMM. APPTMT. Councilmember Hansen recommended Gerri Hilgers and
Paul Malone be appointed to fill the two vacancies on .
the 'Planning Commission.
Mayor Woodburn recommended the appointment of Paul Malone to serve as an
alternate member of the Planning Commission and that the Alternates be moved to
permanent Commission member status.
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council ratify the
recommendation for appointment of Paul Malone as an alternate member of the
Planning Commission and that the Alternates be moved to permanent Commission
member status. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
.
. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, 1987
Page 9
RES. NO. 87-23; Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
APPORT. ASSMTS. Resolution No. 87-23, RESOLUTION RELATING TO
APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO COMBINED
IMPROVEMENT W-77-5 AND W-78-2. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
RES. NO. 87-23; Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
HUN. CLK' S WEEK Resolution No. 87-23, RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK
OF MAY 10-16, 1987, AS MUNICIPAL CLERK'S WEEK, Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
CLAIMS & PAYROLL Sather moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve
Claims and Payroll, as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
TEMP. SIGN PERMIT Clerk Administrator referred Council to a request for
BIG TEN SUPR.CLUB a temporary sign permit from Big Ten Supper Club. She
advised that the Zoning Administrator and Building
Inspecto~ would check to determine if the sign meets size and setback
requirements.
. Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
the Temporary Sign Permit, for the Big Ten Supper Club, for a period not to
exceed 10 days, contingent upon the sign meeting setback and size requirements
of the Sign Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
ADJOURN Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that the meeting be
adjourned at 12:35 a.m., until it reconvenes on April
29, 1987, at 7:00 a,m., at the Village Hall. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
Patricia J. Morrison Robert L. Woodburn
Clerk Administrator Mayor
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, May II, 1987, at 7:30
p,m., at the Village Hall.
.
.
-----
. MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, April 29, 1987, 7:00 a.m. - Village Hall
CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn
called the meeting to order at 7:00 p,m.
ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were
present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy
Hansen, Gary Peck, Thomas Sather and Jeanne Winiecki.
PARK DEDICATION; Councilman Sather advised he had discussed the park
KEITHSON ADDITION dedication for Keithson Addition with Mr.Eibensteiner
and had received an offer of $10,000.00 (10%) for park
dedication.
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council
approve the park dedication of $10,000.00 (10 percent of land value) for the
Keithson Addition; payable in the amount of $769.23 per lot (based on 13 lots)
or by July 1, 1987, whichever comes first. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
DISC. OF JOINT Councilmember Hansen reviewed reasons favoring Arden
FIRE STATION' 1/4 Hills remaining in the Joint Powers Agreement with the
City of Shoreview for Fire Station #4:
- Cooperative working with neighboring cities is important.
- Maintain unity in the Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department.
. - Cost sharing may be cost effective.
Mayor Woodburn reviewed reasons opposing continuance with the Joint Powers
Agreement for Station #4:
-Cooperation for cooperations sake may not necessarily be to Arden
Hills advantage.
-Lake Johanna Fire Department may stay unified; independent system, in
the long run may be more beneficial.
-Costs are high and will continue to increase with additional equipment;
may not be a savings,
-Arden Hills receives little coverage with the Island Lake Site; maybe some
manpower.
Counci1member Peck commented:
-Cooperation is important.
-Joint venture somtimes has a losing side.
-Money is an issue.
-Are we ready?
There was general discussion on land choice, reservations, recruitment of
firefighters, types of equipment and mutual aid pact,
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council
reconsider the motion from the Regular Council meeting of April 27, 1987,
. relative to withdrawsl from the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of
Shoreview for Fire Station #4. Motion carried. (Hansen, Peck, Woodburn,
Winiecki voting in favor; Sather opposed) ~ (5 -0)
Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that the Arden Hills
Villsge Council hereby formally withdraws from the Joint Powers Agreement,
dated October 13, 1986, with the City of Shoreview, for the construction of
Fire Station #4, located at the Island Lake Site. Motion carried. (Hansen,
Peck, Woodburn, Winiecki voting in favor; Sather opposed) (4-1)
JOINT MTG. DATE Council discussed tentative dates for a joint Council
WITH NORTH OAKS meeting with the City of North Oaks, as per their
request dated April 9, 1987. After discussion, Council
suggested Thursday, May 7, 1987! at 7:00 p.m., as a tentative date.
. ADJOURN Peck moved, seconded by Sather, that the meeting be
adjourned at 7:30 a.m. Motion carried unanimously.
(5-0)
Nancy K. Hansen Robert L. Woodburn
Councilmember Mayor
~ . ~~
,
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING ~'~
VILLAGE OF ARDEN HILLS
APRIL 23, 1987
. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:20 p.m. by Chair Barbara Piotrowski.
ROLL CALL
Present: Barbara Piotrowski, Dave Carlson and Ray McGraw.
Absent: Jean Lemberg.
Vacancies: Chair Piotrowski explained that there are two
membership vacancies on the Board of Appeals, due to
the resignation of Tim Tuggle and the Council appointment
of Jeanne Winiecki.
CASE #87-09 - Front and Side Yard Setback Variances, 3290 Sandeen Road, McCloskey
The Board voted unanimously in favor of the 5 ft. front yard setback variance,
justifiable by the slope of the lot away from the street.
The Board voted unanimously against the variance request for the 5 ft. south side
yard setback. The proposed structure will meet, at present (according to the drawing
on the certificate of survey), the existing 10 ft. setback requirement. It appears
the variance was requested in the first place to allow some latitude for the
architect to design a deck or patio. Since the last Council meeting, Ms. McCloskey
has acquired an approximate 10 ft. easement along the south property line.
. The Board realizes the lakeshore lots are narrow and the neighborhood already has
many substandard conditions; when redevelopment occurs we try to bring properties
into conformance. We want to work with the homeowners and we realize the McCloskey
home will be a great improvement to the area. Arden Hills welcomes new home builders
that make our City a more beautiful place to live.
CASE #87-10 - Front Yard Setback, 1305 Tiller Lane, Schull
The Board voted 3-0 against requested setback plans as submitted. We could see no
hardship in this case to justify the variance. It was felt that with the help of an
architect they would get a workable floor plan that could expand out the back of the
home, rather than the front.
Perhaps as Planner Miller notes; considering the uniformity of this block of five
homes, granting this variance might establish a new setback line by precedent. The
houses along that block are 38.5 feet from the street, instead of the required
40 ft. setback.
CASE #87-11 - Lot Split Variance, Oak Avenue, Lot I, Block 4, Tramm
The Board voted unanimously in favor of the proposed lot split and requested variance.
Even with the variance as requested, standard setbacks can be met. The new lot will
have 21,000 sq. ft. of area (14,000 sq. ft. being the requirement), which helps
compensate for the narrow frontage.
CASE #87-12 - Front Setback Variance, Lot North of Lake Johanna Boulevard, Anderson
Mr. Anderson requested a variance on two parcels of land, A & B, stating drainage
. problems of the slopes on the north and west sides.
The Board felt that no matter which way the house plan (as submitted) was positioned
on the lot, run-off would be a problem. Drainage problems exist already at the end
of the access road. Is it not the homeowners responsibility to landscape accordingly,
as to prevent run-off onto other adjacent properties!
~ ' ~
.
Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting, April 23, 1987
Page 2
CASE # 87-12 (Cont'd) The Board concensus in this case was that the slopes
. on the north and east sides of the lot did not justify
a drainage hardship.
Rather, it was noted that without a variance, the home would have little or no rear
yard. On this basis, the variance was approved by a vote of 3-0 on Parcel A only.
The Board determined that Parcel B should be able to meet City Zoning Ordinances,
as it has a slope only on the rear of the property.
The approval of the variance for Parcel A should be attached to the approval and
conditions of the Minor Subdivision.
Submitted by Barbara Piotrowski
Chair
.
.
AGENDA
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
VILLAGE OF ARDEN HILLS
. WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 1987 - 7:30 P.M.
VILLAGE HALL
I. Call to Order and Roll Call.
2. Approval of Minutes of April 1. 1987. Planning Commission Meeting.
3. PUBLIC HEARING. Case #87-08, Rezoning of property at 4949 Highway 10
from B-2 to 1-2, Scherer Brothers Lumber Company.
4. PUBLIC HEARING, Case #87-14, Rezoning of property at Lexington
Avenue north of Grey Fox Road from 1-2 to B-2, C. G. Rein Company.
5. Case #87-10, Front setback variance at 1305 Tiller Lane, Raymond
and Pamela Shull.
6. Case #87-11, Minor subdivision and lot width variance, Lot 1,
Block 4 of Shady Oaks Addition. Kim Tramm.
7. Case #87-12, Front setback variance for lot north of Lake Johanna.
Mark Anderson.
8. Case #87-14, Amended site plan review and rear setback variance,
. 4251 Fernwood Avenue, Alpo Pet Foods. Inc.
9. Preliminary Discusslon, Development of Cummings property on
Lexington Avenue at northeast corner of Cummings Park.
10. Council Report
II. Adjournment.
OM/elm
.
. .
wehrman
PLANNING MEMO bergly
. To: Arden Hills Planning Commission TIQQDt~
From: Wehrman Bergly Associates
Orlyn W. Miller, Planner
Subject: Case #87-10
Front setback variance for house additions n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
at 1305 Tiller Lane 5217 wayza!a blvd.
Applicants: Raymond L. and Pamela J. Shull minneapolis, mn 55416
612 544 7576
Date: Apri 1 10, 1987
The subject property is a single-story house situated approximately 6
feet above the street elevation. According to a recent survey, the
southeast portion of the house is set back 38.5 feet from the front
property line. The attached garage at the west end of the house has a
setback of 46,5 feet.
The applicants want to remodel and expand the house. They are proposing
to remove the existing garage and excavate to bring the floor elevation
of a new garage closer to the street elevation to reduce the slope of
the driveway. Above the garage a new family room is proposed, creating
a split-level condition. The stairs to provide access to the garage and
family room from the existing floor level will be built at the rear of
the present garage space, pushing the proposed garage forward 12 feet.
The new garage/family room wing will then have a setback of 34.5 feet,
requiring a variance of 5,5 feet.
. The applicants are also proposing to expand the master bedroom at the
southeast corner of the house to bring that wing even with the front of
the garage. Therefore, the setback of this wing will also be decreased
to 34.5 feet.
COMMENTS:
1. An option considered relative to the garage/family room wing was
extending the stair space to the rear of the existing garage.
Although this is considered workable, it would create some design
problems related to access and would also require that the gable be
extended to both the front and the rear, creating a more difficult
roof condition.
The proposed garage will be 20 feet wide by 24 feet deep, and the
double stai r will be 8 feet in width. These dimensions could not
be altered significantly to increase the resulting setback.
2. No viable alternative to the proposed plan for expansion of the
master bedroom is apparent without complete rearrangement of the
house floor plan.
3. Based on the topography map of the area and visual observation, the
houses along this block of Tiller Lane are at or near the 38.5-foot
. existing setback of this subject house.
planning. landscape architecture
Because of the similar size, age, and siting of the houses on this
. block, the basis for the requested variance is probably not unique
to this house, nor does it relate directly to a condition of the
land. The City has sometimes approved variances based on the
position of the existing house and for the constraints of its floor
plan, However, considering the uniformity of this block, granting
the variance might establish a new setback line by precident.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposal represents a practical and reasonable approach to expansion
of the subject house. No serious negative impact on adjacent properties
is evi dent. In fact, improvement of the house may represent a positive
impact on adjacent property values, However, no unique or unusual
condition has been identified to justify the variance on the basis of
hardship alone. Furthermore, the degree of the variance requested may
have the affect of establishing a reduced setback for the entire block.
.
.
TIQDo
.'.'.' kf
E2,218,500
88
I X894.
C)f~2 X89tj I D=
! c8 0
X894.1
890
X885.7 . . TILLER LN. x 888.3 X889,2 X
,.- .-
X885.1
X891.0
c2
... ~i
.,
d
./ m
Q)
x
... ..
'-'-'". :,.-"1"';
) I--'
ws. 880..5 If)
C0
.. .
... 892.1
I"l
X
<3 m
~ (IJ
x
:
.
uare /' /610 , I M,., 'A-:l/",~-X'YIA"/J/r/Y
, ! BY~'.&:'11"~
Scale /"-:= 20 R(GIST€REO l.AND SlJHVEYOR
1\11, Ii~q i st 1".1 L iOll lit,. J IJ4)',}
8S1
III SCIlIIlI toll:
101. J',Hlod.: 7, .Jnsephilll' Hills l'I,lt 1I1I,
H,lInSI') ('(jllf\t~'. Ilil'HIPsnl.j
7 tl..1--
f-~-( 2
. L~ ~
~,. ~
"
I~" ~
-< ~p~ '--
~~~ ~
~
---1--'1 ~
1- ;"'0 r 3 _ I 2.. t
... g'i ...
. ~ Jf ~ !
~ ~I ~
~1 ~ ~
. ;[
~ 7 ~ ~
U '';.'''6' ..:.::
.
. <1 ~ r
~ .('( -. ...
~ /"t HOIJ....5~ I ~ J.
X ~ G,s.ya.<:. J .).1-....'" .
~ ~? I 0 ~ ~
'I'> "" J
4-Z..a'N N ~ 3Q.51' --
c ~ f..of"O:"..I. IDz:R ,~ ~
~ ~ \ .;.."".~' '1 ~."fi'.' ",' u_ . "-..,
~ .Ig@1"5!I" '7' J''',~, =r1
f -"[' - ff"" I J" L./_ -_.- L-.i.-..
"I' ,'- fni~
I ~ ";::<Z.: 1'1":. . AJddi.6h .
)'. _j,::1 . c::.. ~ : i
~_ -C.:i.~ ~ w,l@.i ~1c.7 I~~XZ/, :: :."1:.
"'''''''' *~'" .. N ~.. ~ ~~ ~
.Y)\- . ~. ~I. ~ ,1-'1. txS ~ r:: If) oj %
i\'i;s*s>~'X ~ ,or... ~ ."3:>"-, h~ "r,'<i , 'G
, e: '" I -l \;.~ .l\ 11\ I;{) ~i1\ ~ -:
J 'I " : r:: ~, III " ~ l-
. t l."\ II r\ ~ I II I I~ -: -~ u
1 '" I J" .... '" 10.
. \ I ~ ~
'. _--"'-_~ m ""I. 'lB'''-'' _I. 1 ' ~ ,v;
- r' '-' ..._ , ----T- --- ~ :.t..........j-
J9,S.) is J~' ~
~ ~
'l....? It" f7Xf..{ '"', J
')~- .',"
il$fIlAJ+ !t" '
.,
~ [!Lv"......f ~
/ } LL E~e.. LA-Ne ~
~~=='_.=-==-=-.--=-o""-=-=-=----=_,,=,-=-,-,",",.,,,.=-::.=._ .. .__
'!M~ 100,0{) (4,-,,,-,,,-.d) .. ... \
_______._.~.~.._.___~.____..._.___..._______~__._ ___~__ __.___..__ _.. _. I
981.1..7 J)a,.l<1of-tZr Spot- E-1a..va..+,'oJ.1 . Dd.kOt-a..1 Jro~ Fc"-,-,,,-J jUfla.rJ
0..fJ"yi) Vo_of.., ?'opoal/Cla..,,,,/..;,,,, 0 D""",/-<z.s 1,01A P;p'" Mo"""",,'; 5,z,f.
''''~'''., .:.
.. .~ - I I ~" - r;-r ~
~ .
.. 1'.::C .
'R-'-'-LI -- > ...--
I 1\r----...--~-t
i ~
.
I
.
:
. \ I
I
,
I € ~ 0,. )
<> 'N {:'__I
It ,'l.. ~ t
) . ~
'lj ;;: '::l
'. I:; Ii.\-.!:l
~~
. ~
I
I ~
, ", II
, ~
.
I
...---......--......
I
I
.~ I
" ,- I
- < I
<. ..
\J..,<::l I
I '<.-'r-
----- .- -+-~_.
I- )
.n___
.- .-.. I I
<
. ~.J I
I .,~ ,) rt
.. ... .... :~f
'. ~:;: (!J f-r-
.{SQ-\-'0 o :=;,
~ . , -r' , 4:~
.," sZ....sI~+ ~
I " 'X.
;n ~ ./ 1. ! ;.... 7&
o "
. - ~. ---r '''' I
'!:' ~
I -,(UfO 'u1~
I 7-"
I /
I
I
~
I
, J
0
~
=2> /
! oJ
I I+- h ~
!r"~-
i I \
I .~ ... / \
I
I ~
& / ~
~ " 0
0
~
,," ~
. :l '" 44'fror"g' X- l) i
- <:oCl
~ ,
~ I
0
..-4"-P'?hJ ", I
l~
,./
i Of;
t-f- /' I ,.,.-"",-'-,_,,-,'.~"":.'", 0-
'..;t-;.,'i..."..'............w....,:.:.....",_ .,
r..""....c" ".",""".'.- '.
. ,,~.' '~-.' ,"
. r
I
I ~
" I " Ii
'I g QI I :;j M
~ ~ .
~. , r~
, c~ I woo ~
~~~ " ""INIa ~~
WC~ .~
.~ ' ~
~O~ i ~,~
er: o."j oJ,/ ! ;iI,: I >< 0 :.:
w@2" 0 . ~o
~o~<::. ~ ~. ,.it
O~" '" ,. ~20~
~ . " .~
~" ~. ~
M . .'
H ~ Ii ~ ~~
!o g- ~ '... ~
, E t: ~ c
,I 20.~
,~ ~~ '
I ..... ,. ,..IIll;,."'" ,..~, ."w;:. ,'.i" '...'.'1.' .. ~...~ .1 .,' t . H'
..~,.,.. . " ~c' .,'
.~
I I "~ ri
, ! H a '
. --'i J.. '~ j II
, I ' , f It[ . ~ -t
I . .- .
I - ;>t
;1 .' , . I
i .' f
. -.. '" .
-..-. --- -- ..... .
--- . .
---.--
--~
---',...""-- -- -'----
..: . ,~ ,," .
~
LI
~~
" "0 t: '(.1 I
~ {]l<l.l I ~ '
1 . ~ ~
I ,~'" 2 1l.J
oM"; tII C
~ . x ~ I I g' ~
. ' . . I~.
2' <:l 0 ~ t: .
cl" ~ ~ . I ~~
.2 ~~ ~~
~. it I 0 ~
~~ '" ~~ ~~
H ~ ~.1 h
~~ " ~g ~"
8 ' I .~" , ~~
i ' ~ .
~~
. c
~ .
'. 1"
I ~
J"
I" I '.
. . ~ 1
10/ )!
I ~
,
, A
! '
I
"
,: /
PLANNING t~EMO wehrman
. bergly
To: Arden Hills Planning Commission 1l[I15ates
From: Wehrman Bergly Associates, Inc.
Orlyn W. Miller, Planner
Subject: Case #87-11
Minor subdivision and lot width variance
Lot 1, Block 4 of Shady Oaks Addition n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
5217 wayzata blvd.
Applicant: Kim Tramm (Mardon Homes, Inc.) minneapolis, mn 55416
Date: Apri 1 10, 1987 612 544 7576
The subject property is an odd-shaped parcel approximately 1.1 acres in
area. A house exists on the north portion of the parcel, The south
portion is presently used as open yard for the existing home, The
applicant is requesting approval of a minor subdivision to allow the
creation of a new lot by splitting off the south portion of the parcel.
Since the proposed lot has a width of only 75t feet at the front setback
line, a width variance of 20 feet is also requested.
COMMENTS
L The proposed lot will have an area of approximately 21,000 square
feet (14,000 square feet required), It will be 240 feet deep with
an average width of 97.5 feet (50 feet at street and 145 feet at
rear) .
. The north lot, containing approximately 26,400 square feet, will
have a depth of 213 feet and a width of 117 feet. A lO-foot
sideyard setback will be provided for the existing house.
2. A house exists on the lot directly to the south. This house is
approximately 10 feet from the property line. The distance between
this house and the existing house on the subject property is approxi-
mately 95 feet.
3, The primary issue with this proposal is the impact of development
of the lot on adjacent property. Although the picture windows of
the existing house to the north are oriented toward the new lot, that
house will retain a lot nearly twice the size of a standard R-l
lot. The house to the south has an adequate setback and is partially
screened by mature shrubs along the shared property line. Analysis
of the proposed lot indicates that a flexible building envelope
exists and that all setback requirements can be met. Therefore, no
negative impacts on adjacent properties are apparent,
4. The subject lot slopes upward from Oak Avenue approximately 18 feet
to its highest point. The steepness of the slope will require
special treatment to achieve an acceptable driveway grade. The
applicant is currently working on preliminary plans for a house
which would have a tuck-under garage to reduce the driveway slope.
. I believe that a tuck-under design is the appropriate way of dealing
with the slope problem.
planning' landscape architecture
--
CONCLUSIONS:
. The proposed minor subdivision and associated lot width variance are
considered acceptable because:
a. The large lot size compensates for the narrow frontage.
b, A flexible building envelope exists on the new lot,
c. Standard setbacks can be provided,
d. No negative impact on adjacent properties is evident.
.
.
TIQDo CASE #87-11
PAGE TWO
J r ~- \~ \ V'":, 21
.~ , '1,,5~1, l' 1 (:;) :
, 0 ~" " , E 5 M i, ,
.-! ~ . 2.p.1'-' :z..q. \ (8(..~a- - --
I ., '~ ~ G.B,a (~.o.Aoo.) _ ,"
~{....\. ~ -, 3"',-'1-L .--
· [ctW I ~J" 2..0~o.c. I,
....-r1 ~ 4 " _ ~ _ ~ Q
1..1 I~ crm ~ \ "I \>Q'<"
l' l!. "(2.1)/1 ~ ARDEN~ '51
_ ~I 41 (2.4) : 97/1059"" I ' ",0
~-i ) ~ ~.~4'("-a - (1) " (B) ~ (9)
J'" I (37 I D V-.. · -
~& . H I -~.., \ ~ 1 2 Iii 3. ::J 1 (
S I\'......... I l" - :J
.-- e.I01--.. 'I I" - _...../ 5: (" rof.~ 103
Sft4:ec,f >- ':~ ' (oB\ 1(,1
V~ I..... (;... 'J I" 03
,I)
o
-
(3~) ,\"
01'
t
I
,
. .;~.
.-' . _. ............ . .. ~ . . . ." 0.... .. ~ ..
-" /"-
.
C)i1J
\
I -;: +cn , ~? \
I . ~ '?1....1I1 /
· --,-.<)I'Glb____" . ';':;', ~
~,-; r \ \) \
I '",,-
,..I" . ..~._
'h. r- "-. ':'>1 OJ~.,. . /.
,. __ -z-:"... "
(j J _ ~_. -
. 0 '~':", ' -----\' "'~'~I;:\~ D- ."-
, r. .~. \ I . ,s.
I ..... "., _''\
\' " \. ""
\ r \ :/9 o:;Cl'l-t \' I' 6-<i'O <~ ~
'l \ .Lc7J ~01d ~ ..' VQ ~
, " ----
- -'- , Il\;. \ ".---- i
'..f, ~ fTl
. ~ 1, \..--------- I l> .~_
C\ t..----- I (j)::u "
Y'- ~, 1.-..- -:: rT1 0 I
\ lib ,. ,'-"" 'T;;"":' \ :s: l> lj) I
, !~~~'o0' " I fTl 0 !;
..-'-... \ -J:'-1o,,:...:,.. t,' \ Z
!- -- ,'- . (;f) I c':
"'," -j !J
...,\ '\ I . -" ^' '
c..- \.\ _ -- t.l -":. ,', "1
~ I
~ ,\
.102 :r ~ .....'~,' r-
---;-: . S
7 .~i c-\\2 &"
-' I, "?J -- ,.- lJ
'2
, ,',' .,' ~ ' I
"- -:'.... :J' -, ~ r
~, ',: ,I, . '" .\' .. "'.' 'I ,fI
.) ., V J
L-rOt (I \ _
\ . \-:=\ wY-.
\ \ "'\
L,.--J
.
.------- \ ~ I
"... '.. ' \
wehrman
PLANNING MEMO bergly
. To: Arden Hills Planning Commission llQQ5iat~
From: Wehrman Bergly Associates, Inc.
Orlyn W. Miller, Planner
Subject: Case #87-12
Setback variances for two lots n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
Applicant: Mark Anderson 5217 wayzata blvd.
minneapolis, mn 55416
Date: Apri 1 10, 1987 612 544 7576
Last December, the applicant received approval of a minor subdivision to
create two lots from the 0.73-acre parcel north of Lake Johanna. The
lots are not on a public street, but are served by an established access
easement.
The applicant has prepared a preliminary plan for a house on the north
lot and would like to place the house within 20 feet of the west property
line. Since the west property line is considered the front of the lot,
a 20-foot variance is requested.
COMMENTS:
L The zoning ordinance defines front lot line as "The boundary of a
lot abutting a street". Since neither of the lots front on a
street, it is debatable if a "front lot line" actually exists. If
. we assume, however, that all lots have some portion that represents
a frontage, the west lot line which is directly adjacent to the
access easement is the most logical candidate in this case,
2. The City Attorney has determined that the access easement is not a
public easement dedicated to the City. It is a legally established
easement in favor of and for the benefit of the adjacent property
owners, including the applicant. It is reasonably safe to assume
that no standard public street will ever be constructed on the
easement. It is possible that the easement could be used for
access to the parcel to the north, but the topography makes this
unlikely,
3. The property directly west of the subject lots is owned by Ramsey
County and is part of the Ramsey County Open Space. It is reasonable
to expect that this will remain as permanent open space.
4. Two existing houses adjacent to the access easement appear to be
set back less than 20 feet from the easement line.
5. The applicant's primary rationale for reducing the setback from the
west lot line relates to the steep slope at the rear of the lot.
If a 40-foot setback is enforced, the rear of the house will be at
the base of the slope. For reasons of avoiding drainage problems
and to create a usable rear yard, moving the house west is considered
. desirable.
planning' landscape architecture
CONCLUSIONS:
. L The requested setback variance is acceptable because:
a. The subject lot is unique in that the front of the lot is not
on a public street.
b. No negative impact upon adjacent properties is evident.
c. The steep slope at the north and east portions of the lot
represent a hardship related to the land itself.
2. If the variance is granted, it should be conditioned upon satisfaction
of all conditions attached to the approval of the minor subdivision.
(Progress is being made, but not all items have been completed,)
.
.
lIIb CASE #87-12
PAGE TWO ,
,
i
,
. TOPO I
i
---.-
, Cer/i/h:cr/e o/' ~urvcy
, If -" " " "~~'""U"".... '
.. ~, 424/ Sylviq Lane
~:,
~ Shore View J Mn, 5S12C
L
. ... Norlh line or Lol .J /Vorlh'Q'! Corn... or S'tcl,." 33, ",
,,;J wi,.t mnh (irtt:~ . I 730) 12 23 (Cast Iron Mpnum41')1.).../
. -::r-;.:::,L.-- .-'--.-- , . 150,00 .... ......
'"-''' f -.-<''''
I: \ 5At ...- 2.3z, 0 ..., ...,-
l
~
,
[
r \.30...
r Parcd ;:1
f' ,
&" ..../
F \\ 'S'
" ~
f
,,: ~
i, "
t: ..:z
,
.
~, \Q
'-"- ::>
.,1 <<>
r 150,00 c
t. <' '(;; -,
.
r r-
c
\~ , -
~ ~ "
~ ", l>>
Ii ,.
I ::>
.i; . - ...
~ \' ParC2/ B
I.
,
\ - >-..
,
~
~
~
\ ... 150.00 .... ...\
,
I \
'},o \
, \ \
c..~'" \
\
. dmoles e>[is/in~ Iron monumen/,
o d'no/es Iron monument sd,
PAI?~~.!o..A
The m,lerly 15{) /e~1 01 fhi norlherly 11'25 1M or Lol 3) Block 5 J Shady
Oaks Addil/on (measured along Ih( norlh and iClslerly lines or said
Lo13) J Ramsey Coun!y J Minneso/a .
PAgC,Eh.8 _
TfJ' easlerly 150/i'd or Ihe $ou/fJlrly 112,5 J7.d or the norlherly 225:Jd
. or Lot .3 J Blocle 5, Shody Oaks Addilion (mlC1sured aloni Ihe north
rind taslerly liniS or said LoI 3)~ Ramsey Counly J Minmsola.
Scalt; j#=...Ji:L ! hl?rt.b,y cer/:fi /hal/h.'!>' f!atl,surwy or rLporl was pr"tpond E.G. t<UD! 50NS,fNC.
B k. 27 ~ me or un r Sl:. dlr,c! .suplr'r%IOn and Ihal I Qm a dul'y LANDI !;URVE YOkS
00 t.ji.!;/lrtd Land urvtyor unjtr /he laws or Iht. Slale oj 9560 U'X'(~/or) Ave N.
tbgQ. _8-- Mmnlso!a. Da/ul th;,:j~CJay Dr lJ"C'~nP4c;'" J 19Bb . Cir~/e Pm s: Mn. 55014
Jo ilo,~ ~ _or->> w../ , J.?, islra/'on No. 'l~ Til, 70(;-5.5 G
-- --.._---
-
--~-
,.......
- -+..
.~ '~"'1 '.
. -.-=
.. ~-
5.2'\ ./" //'
, ~'~h
.. /' ;Q ,
'" ,. <:1 '0
/ I~ - I
" ..____--. ~.' / i 9
I ,:~:~.' () --/. / / ..., "
." '. ,-J------ . .'
,.:.~., ' ~".:.__/~/". ' ~ ~
. ,;, //. ,~.--c--C:..--. / '
. . ~ " 1
p,/ ,/ .....~. f'
.'i' / ,....' ./ .. .. ~ l n ~ 1
".1. " 'C( _ /" .. - :> cI
-1f>"'" //' ~--'-_.. .. .." ,- ll- "" ' /f
If''..- ...-. ... --- . "~
. ..,. / ...-/~.--- ./ ,,"'
" y ~~ ,0 '/' . /. -. 7 ~
'~,... //0'- J _' /.-/. . ..A .w ..
,f .-"~ --- /'
, /.,..... /../ .... . ~.... .... 0 <, < {l.
:..,,/ ,'''~'' / "....:-:/... ........ // /,' ,;; ;
.' " ." ./ " 0 . /
..----...\ /It.:..., ..//;~,v ///... ,---/ '" ~ ~ 4.i I'
/'" /'/ ' < .-,
. .' . yJ ' - .
.' ," . ..
. f ,,,.. ... ,~ f ' 0
. /",0' / -1
, .' ' ..
/ "f! .' ,. J
I" ' I .' , "<
" G . .i " " {l.
" I I,., I
. ,I 'i
~ ~ : j'l..i,,:Q.,oz.
"l J .1
f i
, " I
I '
I ;,' j I
I / ./i.1 I , '
cJ " "I !
~ ,..' .
, ' ."'" i' '. ~ I
O I I ~"-m .
,0' ~ ,
//,,1,51/ . // I
. ., /> '
~ I / "(\ \ . i
e / /. '0\' '
I'" ' I
1 j I ,0 "j
? \,i).,. e /'/0'
o c' ' ./ /~, '
\ /'. ,.--/// ,,</,>-, 1
V .. .' / .. ,
\ <.~. / .
. 0"""" .. '
. <.~ / '
\0 ~...... '
, .. ,/~ ",/ ' '
~ : .~<;oe-o -,.. . ;
. .,.. I (...- /' I
<' ," '
, ,\~ ~
.." '
c( , :/_.... / I
ex ",----
j /" I
j . -';' :: . '. ..~
.. .. ,..' I
i
I '
I
, '
,
~ I
I i
! I
! I
PLANNING MEMO wehrman
bergly
. To: Arden Hills Planning Commission llQQE)ates
From: Wehrman Bergly Associates, Inc.
Orlyn W. Miller, Planner
Subject: Case #87-15
Site plan review and setback variance
for addition to building n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
4251 Fernwood Avenue 5217 wayzata blvd.
Applicant: Alpo Pet Food, Inc. minneapolis, mn 55416
612 544 7576
Date: April 29, 1987
The applicant is proposing to construct a 17' X 31' addition to the
northwest corner of the existing building. A bituminous area for service
access to the addition is proposed to extend from the west edge of the
existin9 bituminous service area,
The proposed addition will be constructed of concrete block to match the
present building. It will be 21 feet in height (existing building
ranges from 18 to 26 feet in height). The applicant's surveyor has
recently completed a survey of the building location and has determined
that the new addition will be 63 feet from the rear property line.
Since a 75-foot setback is required, a 12-foot variance is also requested.
COMMENTS
1. The project engineer has given me the following information regarding
. the construction and use of the proposed addition:
The building will house a tank for the storage of liquid
ta 11 ow. The location for the addition was chosen to allow
convenient service access from the existing service area and
to place the product storage near the place where it is needed
in the manufacturing process. The storage tank will be sealed
and, therefore, should not emit additional odors. The additi on
will not involve installation of mechanical equipment on the
roof or adjacent to the building. An air intake vent will be
installed at the northwest corner.
Service access for a supply truck is provided to the addition.
It is estimated that refilling of the storage tank will be
required once each month. No other service function will
occur in this area.
2. The ordinance requires a 75-foot setback from a residential zoning
district for any non-residential structure. Since the rear property
line of the subject property is the division between the 1-1 and
R-l Districts, a 75-foot rear setback is required in this case. As
previously stated, a recent survey has determined that the new
addition will be 63 feet from the rear property line, requiring a
12-foot variance. (The existing building is 68t feet from the
property 1 ine.)
.
planning' landscape architecture
The variance condition could be avoided by moving the addition
south along the west wall of the existing building. If located
. near the southwest corner of the existing building, service could
be accommodated from the south parking and service area. This
location, however, is at the opposite end of the building from
where the product is used in the manufacturing process and would
require 200 feet of piping to deliver the product to the mixing
platform, Since the tallow must be heated to remain liquid, the
delivery pipes would also have to be heated. Therefore, the
applicant has chosen the proposed location for efficiency and
economy.
3. It should be noted that a 50-foot-wide public pedestrian way exists
between the subject property line and the rear of the closest
single-family lots. This condition effectively creates a 113-foot
separation between the proposed addition and the adjacent lots.
The ordinance, however, establishes the setback from the zoning
district line, which is the same as the subject property line.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed addition is relatively minor and will not significantly
alter the present use of the site.
2, The rationale for the requested setback variance relates to the
location and configuration of the existing structure, not specifically
to a hardship caused by the characteristics of the land. However,
. the additional separation provided by the 50-foot pedestrian way
mitigates the setback encroachment.
3. If the Planning Commission favors the variance, the justification
would have to be that the pedestrian way creates a unique condition
of this lot which mitigates any negative effects of the encroachment
upon adjacent properties.
4. The applicant should be reminded that the ordinance states that no
service activity audible in. a residential district shall occur
between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (Section VI,E(4))
.
mOo CASE #87-15
PAGE TWO
\ \:Z f
~ I
~. ,
~' 3~
"
r 7 6 543 2 I
,
- - ---~~~.
~ &0.6
~ ~
"1 S. ,....
- \9- - - - -
~(toJ" " J
Q I' ':~I
\f l 't ) 0 '1
""'''1' i. ~2~~
(I") 'I' ~::n. I
4 N 1'1 '. ". - f-a: 'Z:c
- :;:t ~
Ui .( .-
!'~ lJJ -i,:g I
" .3'~1 ~OI~D I
d N. Wlfl
I :.:n.IIlI'-
I, $ , " ":IE~ I
O '" 6J 47 2 0.511
. ~ 1- ,It<.
o I ru 0
'" , ~ /2.) r- ,"5~. (I).J
7 ~':2 (I7:Q) ~
rf40l - l.MJ.
~ A.H.W<L-/lI!fT<1nk1
,'7% oLe.
_ ~ (3) r-- I. Ol'l.'
'=1~l- ;': (.,aU' 9 ~ St/h ;ec;f ~w
U .>>u. V
Oz.) -- ~ (.".,;, ~/ie i
- r-. .a,~~. ,=-
2 ~ L ,
. ,,"] . I. J '" I..
~. ".-. /.) 14,55,~~, ,0 I
.!'--- - ...., \..10 rtJ if'
(I).: ..'5A.~. I ~ ;;
B.9 . .5',,' 21" E ~
l3o.t Z'77, 51 rO'lO\ (I) g
ci \:JJV I:l
~ (4-<.) 2 I
o
I
) Q . I
W I
~f (+J493'j
,.)-] . ._. - - ...-
~ - - '"
.
. to (h ~ t ~
Co. ,~ 4.2_/0 f,l
-H5 2i q
'5:> ~~ (7) 1 ~
Lj;4 ;< ltf
200 ]I -- h I .... I
, ~ I (+ 1~49,9.B'l
I.G>7~c.. : I
(9) , I
~_:i,.L ._ , .' ... . f N44oc., _ I (7.33ae.
!~ ,-.,z-.... .~... 864- 56 ~".n ..... ~~.l_\n.e. of 52..p,c.. _'J I. I
LZO'-o.,.t . _...... ..-4'2.0'...... ..
'~o, ~ .~. ~.... +53 .. f I
-- "1 I
'\':1ll ~ , I
\ S3] 'e ,
~ \ Joa Ill)
" 77 (2.) '" iii 5.00 dC, '..#
~ ~ ~ . F 1
\: \I ( 'i ~ ,
'" ~ ~ .?'vSSZC . 7.4!Jc= '" ~ ~50 (I) r- I
" Ii ' "1 W
~ ' " 7 <<) I I
".' ,,,- , ., ;;; . I
:~ V ,t).., I
I.t:l " " I I
~ I .
\" , t) I
~~ ~. I
:1 ~ ,,~.
., ..,.,. "2 IN ' " . 1
, f, ~,. " dJ .:J ..... }4. ~ - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _
r. :-'1 .... ~ s eZ " ?' . I
'" I " , .' 572, /6 ;;"',," I
_ I :J\ _ .r-',A .... , I
q'J W ~'e ., ; 39B.4'
Z \ - 453' .' - ~r (+"93?
1-: \ ,- _, ~ .
JJ' , 7- . .uo 374..... "
.~ - .In. .7,...1 .../fA &:7: ~
f ..
.
CERTlFlCA TE OF SURVEY
MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS
500 W. HWY. 96 314 OAK ST. 18 4TH AVE. S.E.
5T, PAUL 12, MINN, SAUK CENTRE. MINN. ST. CLOUD. MINN.:
484.3301 352,3664 251-7751
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Registered land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
~-- A g~~_ Reg, No. 7725Date Apr, 19, 1968
?~ y v#. ~ /( 1/ /Nfe ,J;:I
. ~ 1"':.1'" >,"5/ ..oN.';:' /1~1 30 ~CNj ,
Lfv.//~~ Lor. CAY ,#3
Add jf-r';'~ PV"t1r1l1s~r:f - ~'~ 276. 74 ~~ . ~
,1"/.10..1 1'-'>'4-87 / J ~
' ~
"i ~
," ~
-;?3
, \
,Z _ If,l J ~~
~ n7J(. .-,' f :JJ13~ ~
r .,. 3D.%. '-. - .-. 799-:/7,.I-.::f iY)
.,':> ~ t\
., , I~'
l ~'t- 0~ J-f.
,"i;" . '<;) ~ I~
.f{OJ'~' l,:j
~/ ~ ~ 'v ~
'<J >4 I~
... ,
,
120.4 ~ <.: ':"~':.~l!....":-_ :-J "
\)
~. \.
.
,
/" ~ 200 ~ '~
'::j." i~
~
~
'-... ' '0 ~ l
~ ~ }
f
\...
I "
! ~I .~
'" '<:: ,
~ -
.
- lac,?, 6',5' '~Ul'
222 '.t- o
300'
5. J.,;"~ ~I AI. 44 Acr"'5 333
r
l ....
rJ
D'
-,.,.,
The South 30 acres of the North 44 icres of the West 1/2 of the -.:-.
SE 1/4 of Section 22, Township 30, Range 23, lying Easterly of iJ"
the centerline of State Trunk Highway No. 51, except the
East 33 feet thereof and except that part taken for rnghway purposes
~f'-4N' .. 6'- 14...{~,:i
,~ :". ,(d /5. ,..:: !. ".-I-r;:'~ 2 9'{-7C';":~
' ,'r, ~';':_':- 'J
.~-,_._.,... _ __ c....... . ....... H- . ...- --.. -.- .-.---. " :_ ,_.:.:f~L~~"'-'
')
. ;~
'k "'I" __ __~
r 100~, "-':'.- -~_~.~_-.:'~::= ~.~ ':_,_ _~..~ __ . ;g~~
/ ,- " __ ..,' -c:=., ':=':;CC;;;;C .-..':::. . _1':'';-,'' I
, '.'8 -- ,-' ~ ---.-.~-.~---~ -- "
V '" r - __ ~-- -.. --... '"
_~.... ~ r' r'-''' ~ -- ~ \ .... '--..
" ~- / ,.1 /, / , 060 ''')' \ \ ..
- ~ / /, ~
f .- // ./ ..- /.. . - pio:r~G-r tXI:7fI1JG. tlZ":J.S. ANt> \ :
i '0<*- ,/ ./ / GHF2Ue? -00 Nl>'- iZ"-I>1l\\k J i
" i I
f....- S./ ./
~:' 1005, 100 / j: I
, '-. ./ . ---./! I
! IOb+l_ ", / ~ / \ .---' ., /
fi "'-." .~8.i' / i
,.', '"'-.. ~ 1 I 'I~l
Ii Iw?>. -]"" N~h1 ./ ./ ; I ~
ii- --', " ADDll'lON .-' -- I
,'~oz... ~~, _ / --. .__ ..__", __.__ .__._ '
~ "-., l
"-. l..l00G
'- -,,- UJ
. \ I \/ Z
'/ \. II
\ I " -
\ . ~'loD5
, i Ii"""" .... _... -1
I I'!
" Iii 0
.\ \ I I I 0
1\. f. . . ,1004-
!t..... \ j / ! 1 __._ ..._,/ i / 0
'," " \ '
,'\ \ I / i I :>
~- \ \ I . \ >
t \ \ f / i 1 --'-. --~ ,,~'~loo3
....' i i., , a:
. \ '. i / 1""-" 'I \ UJ
,- \ 1 j 1 -" , I
r\ \ \, J j t "........ , ) I II
i,'.' !,: I , .~ '_' _____.___..../ I I &...L..
I' I I , \ '-
" ~ \ j' \ I .. \ "-.. '1/ ....-- '- 1002.
\ . ! '. J' '- /
. j f, I '-.. ~__ '.____ _.___ ___ _~__ .--.. \ \ . _,_ .____ ./
i! l i I
\ I I i I -'- -' '- 1001
, \',
I 1\ \ .
i \ \ J
, ,
, \, \ \ I !
/ \ \ < ,
/ \ \ ~ ! j
. \ .
\ "-.. '. / / /' ".. -1000
, \ /
\', -'" '---"" ~ / / / /~
\ \ -'" // ///
, , ''-., '-"''''- ~-- / / //",/
- , , ',- ~-. ".- ,- .- ----'=--- / < :;:- />'
"..... '-" -- ~- ~ /"/ / --'---",
\ -"'" '- _m...... --- _ // / / ---..... I
/.... ," / ''-'-.... I
',", // / I "'.'_ I
\ ". _ // / I _ --, ___ qaD
" ...~._- _'~_m __! 7
.,
"'." /' !
-, -'''- .../
~-- /'
--..- --- ~~-~
'-,
"
,~ "
-............... ",
"''' "
. ,', '/
'- '- '-,- .. "-..
.. -.. \ I
' ,
''\..... \ I
"-. \ ,
\, \ __' I
\ \ ( /
\ ' /
, \ '....,
\ \
~
~~
. ~~
.
...
~
~
. V; .r-i~
l-
e 'Z
'" I- ~" <l
" 7 7
0 0: if ~~ .jdf!<tM 1-",
0 8 1"'
-' :~
III '" ) wO
^ 0 ....'Z
, ""u... ~~ it ill"
~ 'C 30: '"
~
. Ov 3:;5
'" "--
~ o:(~ \-",
r::L ..J:;i "'''1'' W-
III ..'" <0
" t:i~ "Z
()
TO
~" N
3~
>-7
"'0
=-
~"
~L"
~-"
<<L<
_~83. -<
-~ d
~I
'"
I --,
I
I- 111
'2
~ <
~ ~ ~J
& c ~fi
~ ~
L ~\I
0:
a v
~ " I
. :... '" ~
C L I
, It ~
" I
~ 0
... ~
'" ~ I
"
I -z
I Ul
\=5"
I ;;2
I ill'.
-'"1
( ill..:
"
" I 1-'"
B " I '"
~ I w
~ \- ::?:
0 :z
~ if I
~
z
~ 0 J ()
~ v I
0: <i\S
0
0 I
~
'" '0
, .'
~
~
..
.,
'~ ~
'" "
~ " .
~ "
z ~
~ "" ~
",0: '"
. 9,8 ~.
,,'" ~*
~~
.-.
- ,
JAMES S. LYNDEN
ATTORNEY AT LAw
.
May 7, 1987
Ms. Patricia J. Morrison
Clerk-Administrator
City of Arden Hills
Ci ty Hall
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Re: Ordinance Amending Snowmobile Pro\1i sions in Arden Hi 11 s 'Code
Dear Pat:
I enclose herewith a revised draft of the Ordinance which adds
. the points discussed by the Counci 1 at the last council meeting.
I have tinkered further with the language in Section 26-35 so
that it is somewhat more clear as to what is allowed and what is
not allowed. Neither you nor I are still clear as to whether or
not the Council wishes to allow recreati onal motor vehicles to
operate on the unpaved portion of the right-of-way of most
streets, highways and roads.
Very truly yours,
<'-
JSL/dls
Enclosures
.
612 223.5436 612297.6400
800 AM HOIST TOWER ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
,
. STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. ;l fb
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 26
OF THE ARDEN HILLS CODE'BY INCREASING PURVIEW
THEREOF TO ENCOMPASS RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES,
REORGANIZING SAID ARTICLE, AND ADDING A SECTION
REQUIRING MANDATORY PENNANTS FOR SNOWMOBILES
The City Council of Arden Hills ordains:
Section 1. Change of Title of Article II of Chapter 26 of
Arden Hills Code. Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hill s
Code is hereby amended to read "RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES".
Section 2. Amendment to Section 26-22 of Arden Hills Code.
Section 26-22 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
. "See. 26-22. Adoption and Incorporation by Reference
of Statutes and Regulations.
Sections 84.1 through 84.90 of Minnesota Statutes, as
now constituted and as hereafter amended, together
with the regulations of the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, including specifically but not
limi ted to, Sections NR5l through 59 as now
consti tuted and as hereafter amended, are hereby
adopted by reference, made a part of this Chapter as
though completely set forth herein, and shall regulate
the operation of recreational motor vehicles on lands
not owned by the operator within the City. At least
three (3 ) copies of said statutes and regulations, as
so adopted, shall be marked as official copies and
filed in the office of the Clerk-Administrator in the
City Hall.
Section 3. Repeal of Section 26-22(b) of Arden Hills Code;
Addition of New Section 26-23 Thereto. Article II of Chapter 26
of the Arden Hi lls Code is hereby amended by striking, deleting
and repeal ing subsection (b) of Section 26- 22 the reo f , and
substituting therefor a new Section 26-23 which reads as follows:
.
- 1 -
. "Sec. 26-23. Effect of Violation of Statutes and
Regulations. Any violation of the statutes and
regulations adopted by reference in the previous
Section hereof shall be considered a violation of this
Article of the Arden Hills Code when it occurs within
the limits of the City. Any person violating any
provision thereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and
shall be punished as provided in Section 1-10 of this
Code."
Section 4. Deletion of Title "DIVISION 2. SNOWMOBILES" and
Repeal of Sectlons 26-29 and 26-30 of Arden Hills Code. The title
"DIVISION 2. SNOWMOBILES", which iiPpears between Sections 26-22
and 26-29 of the Arden Hills Code, is hereby deleted, and
Sections 26-29 and Sections 26-30 thereof are hereby repealed.
Section 5. Addition of New Section 26-'-24 to Arden Hills
Code. Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills Code 1S
hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 26-24 which reads
as follows:
Sec. 26-24. Intent.
It is the intent of this Article to supplement the laws
of this State with respect to the operation of
recreational motor vehicles, in particular, and
. Chapters 168 through 171 of Minnesota Statutes, as
amended, in general. Thi s Article is not intended to
allow what the State statutes prohibit nor to prohibit
what the State statutes expressly allow."
Section 6. Addition of New Section 26-25 of Arden Hills
Code. Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby
amended by adding thereto a new Section 26-25:
"Sec. 26-25. Definitions. For the purposes of this
Article, the following words and phrases shall have the
meanings respectively ascribed to them:
(a) All Terrain Vehicle: An off-road vehicle or
motorized flotation-tired vehicle of not less than
three (3) low pressure tires, but not more than six (6)
tires, that is limited in engine displacement of less
than 800 cubic centimeters and total dry weight of less
than 600 pounds.
(b) Operate: To ride in or on and control the
operation of a recreational motor vehicle.
(c) Operator: A person who operates or is in actual
physical control of a recreational motor vehicle.
.
- 2 -
. (d) Owner: A person, other than a lien holder, having
ownership of or title to a recreational motor vehicle
and entitled to the use or possession thereof.
(e) Recreational Motor Vehicle: A self-propelled
vehicle and any vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-
propelled vehicle used for recreational purposes
including, but not limited to, any snowmobile, trail
bike, all-terrain vehicle, hovercraft and other motor
vehicle 1 icensed for highway operation which is be1ng
used for off-road recreational purposes.'
( f) Roadway: Tha t portion of a highway improved,
designed or ordinarily designed for vehicular traffic.
(g) Snowmobile: A self-propelled vehicle designed for
travel on snow or ice on a natural terrain, steered by
wheels, skis or runners.
Section 7. Change in Notation as to Sections Reserved at
End of Division 1 of Article II of Chapter. The notation at the
end of Div1sion 1 of Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills
Code as to Sections reserved for future use is hereby amended to
read as follows:
... "Sees. 26-26 through 26-30. Reserved.
Section 8. Addition of New Title for Division 2 of Article
II of Arden Hills Code and Placement Thereof. Immediately prior
to Section 26-31 of the Arden Hills Code, the following new title
for Division 2 of Article II of Chapter 26 thereof shall be
inserted:
"DIVISION 2. REGULATIONS"
Section 9. Substitution of Term "Recreational Motor
Vehicle" for "Snowmobile" Wherever the Latter A pears in Sections
26-31 through 26-48 of Arden Hi Is Code. Wherever the term
"snowmobile" appears in Sections 26-31 through 26-48 of the Arden
Hills Code, the term 'recreational motor vehicle" shall be
substituted therefor.
Section 10. Alteration of Section 26-35 of Arden Hills
Code. Section 26-35 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
.
- 3 -
.
. 'Sec. 26-35. Operation Within Right-Of-Way.
It shall be unlawful for any person:
(al To operate a recreati onal motor vehicle upon the
roadway, of any trunk, county state aid, city or
county highway, and, in the case of a divided
trunk or county highway, on that portion of the
right-of-way which lies between the opposing
lanes of traffic except as provided herein;
(bl To operate a recreational motor vehicle wi thin
the unpaved portion of the right-of-way of any
trunk, county state aid, city or county highway
between the hours of 1/2 hour after sunset to 1/2
hour before sunrise except on the outer most part
of the unpaved portion of the right-of-way and in
the same direction as the hi ghwa y traff i c on the
nearest lane of the roadway adjacent thereto; and
(cl To operate a recreational motor vehicle at
anytime within the right-of-way of any interstate
highway or freeway."
Section II. Modification of Section 26-36 of the Arden
. Hills Code. Section 26-36 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby
amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 26-36. Operation on Roadway.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a
recreational motor vehicle upon the roadway of any city
street except as permitted in Section 26.38 hereof."
Section 12. Revision of Section 26- 4 2 of the Arden Hills
Code. Section 26-42 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby amended
in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 26-42. Proxmity to Residences.
Section 13. Modif ica tion of Section 26-45 of the Arden
Hills Code. Section 26-45 of the Arden Hills Code is hereby
. amended in its entirety to read as follows: ~
, "- ~~(r
~\ - 4 -
. "Sec. 26-45. Equipment Generally.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a
recreational motor vehicle unless it is equipped with at
least one headlamp and one tail lamp, a deadman's
throttle, and brakes, such lamps, throttle and brakes to
conform to State Law and to standards prescribed by the
rule of the commissioner of highways pursuant to the
authority vested in him by Section 84.86 of Minnesota
Statutes."
Section 14. Addition of New Section 26-49 to Arden Hills
Code. Division 2 of Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills
Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 26-49
which reads as follows:
/
"Sec. 26-49. Mandatory Pennant fo~ Snowmobile.
'.
No person shall operate a snowmobile unless such
vehicle is equipped with a red or orange blaze
pennant flag of at least forty (40) square inches in
area and displayed at a height of not less than five
(5) feet above the treadway."
Section 15. Addition of New Section 26-50 to Arden Hills
. Code. Division 2 of Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills
Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 26-50
which reads as follows:
"Sec. 26-50. Operation of All Terrain Vehicle.
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate an all
terrain vehicle anywhere within the limits of the
City from and including April 1 to and including
October 31 of each year."
Section 16. Addition of New Section 26-51 to Arden Hills
Code. Division 2 of Article II of Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills
Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 26-51
which reads as follows:
"Sec. 26-51. Inapplicability of Regulations to Governmental
Agencies.
The Regulations contained in Chapter 26 of the Arden Hills
Code shall not be applicable to the operation or use of a
recreational motor vehicle by agents, representatives,
employees or officials of governmental agencies while in
pursuit of their governmental duties or during emergency
situations."
.
- 5 -
. Section 17. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be
effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the Council this day of , 1987.
Robert Woodburn, Mayor
Attest:
Patricia J. Morrison,
Clerk-Administrator
.
.
- 6 -
.
.
MINUTES OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Wednesday, May 6, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. - Village Hall
. CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Acting Chair
Scott Petersen called the meeting to order at 8:20 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Acting Chair Scott Petersen, Thomas Babcook, Dorothy
Zebm, Gary Thorn and Paul Malone.
Absent: Chairman Robert Curtis, Maurice Johnson, Peter Martin,
Calvin Meury and Rick Savage.
Also Present: Mayor Robert Woodburn. Councilmember Jeanne Winiecki,
Planner Orlyn Miller and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago.
OATH OF OFFICE Councilmember Winiecki administered the Oath of Office
to newly appointed.Planning Commission Member Paul
Malone. The Commission Members welcomed Paul.
APPROVE MINUTES Moved by Zebm, seconded by Malone, that the Minutes of
April 1, 1987, be approved as submitted. Motion carried.
(Zebm, Malone. Petersen. Thorn voting in favor; Babcook abstained) (4-0-1)
CASE NO. 87-08; The Public Hearing was opened at 8:25 p.m. Deputy Clerk
REZONING FROM B-2 Iago vertified the publication of the Notice of Hearing
TO 1-2; SCHERER in the New BriRhton Bulletin, on Wednesday, April 22nd,
LUMBER, HWY. 10 and mailing on the same date.
Planner Miller reviewed his memorandum of 4-10-87 and noted that under current
zoningt the existing lumberyard is a non-conforming use. He noted the following
. factors which support the requested rezoning:
1. Rezoning is necessary to accommodate the upgrading of an existing use.
2. The site is relatively isolated, surrounded on three sides by major
arterials.
3. The land across Highways 10 and 35W is zoned and developed industrially.
Miller recommended approval of the requested rezoning.
Larry Leitshuh, Scherer Lumber, explained that it is Scherer Lumber's desire to
bring the property into conformance by requesting the rezoning from B-2 to 1-2.
Acting Chair Petersen asked if Council had approved any other variances than
those listed in the Planning Commission recommendation in the minutes of
4-1-87.
Planner Miller advised the Council had not approved any further variances; he
noted that a sign variance would have to be considered as a separate action.
Leitshuh advised they have not finanlized plans for the sign and are not
requesting a sign variance at this time.
Acting Chair Petersen asked if there were any comments from the floor either in
favor of or opposed to the proposed rezoning of this parcel.
. There was no response from the floor.
.
~
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 2
REZONING (CONT'D) The Public Hearing was closed at 8:30 p.m. .
Thorn moved, seconded by Babcook, that COlIDDission
recommend to Council approval of the request for Rezoning from B-2 to 1-2, Case
No. 87-08, Schere Brothers Lumber, 4947 Highway 10, as submitted. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-14; The Public Hearing was opened at 8:31 p.m. Deputy Clerk
REZONING FROM 1-2 Iago verified the publication of the Notice of Hearing
TO B-2, C.G.REIN in the New Bri~hton Bulletin, on Wednesday, April 22nd,
LEXINGTON AVENUE and mailing on same date.
Planner Miller reviewed his memorandum dated 4-29-87, and noted that a
preliminary development plan for the site has been submitted, however, the
Commission need only address the land use issue at this time.
The Planner advised the C.G. Rein Company is proposing to construct a 15,900
sq. ft. shopping center on the 2.5-acre parcel north of St. Paul Metal craft.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this areas as industrial and the site is
currently zoned 1-2, a district which does not permit retail uses. Therefore,
rezoning to B-2 General Business is being requested.
Miller also noted for COlIDDission that the less desirable uses in the B-2
District are permitted by Special Use Permit, allowing the City to retain a
measure of control on the site development.
Bill Sikora, Architect for C.G. Rein, displayed a drawing which compared land .
use in Shoreview and Arden Hills along the Lexington Avenue Corridor. He
pointed out that Lexington Avenue, in this area, was taken on an increasingly
commercial/service charater and the large office developments to the north of
this site, along the Highway 694 corridor, can support further development of
this nature. Sikora advised there would be a combination of use proposed,
service and small retail uses.
Member Babcook asked if a service station was proposed for the site.
Sikora advised there is no service station proposed.
Discussion items included:
- The amount of occupied space at the Shannon Square development.
- The possibility of the applicant obtaining a small amount of the property
contiguous with Shannon Square, rather than this parcel.
- The possibility of any future retail development along Red Fox Rd.
Dennis Cavanaugh, President of C.G. Rein, advised members that he had discussed
the possibility of obtaining a portion of the Gould land, adjacent to Shannon
Square~ however, the owner was not interested in selling in the near future.
Sikora advised that Shannon Square is 75% occupied at present. and that the
remaining leases are under option.
.
--------------- -------------------
-
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 3
. REZONING (CONT'D) Planner advised that there is a 2-acre parcel between
the Emerald Inn and Northwoods that has been reserved
by the owner for retail development (on Red Fox Road). He noted that the owner
proposes a restaurant for the site which would require a SUP.
Acting Chair Petersen asked for comments from the floor in favor of or opposed
to the requested rezoning.
There was no response form the floor.
The Public hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m.
There was discussion relative to permitted uses in both 1-2 and B-2 districts,
increased traffic on Lexington Avenue and the need for retail development.
Sikora advised that the demand for space within Shannon Square has prompted the
rezoning request.
Planner Miller stated that although he has some concern about increasing the
"strip commercial" appearance along Lexington Ave, the requested rezoning is
generally acceptable for the following reasons:
1. The retail/service uses will not adversely affect the operation and
safety of Lexington Ave. more than uses permitted under current zoning.
2. Use permitted by right in the B-2 district would not be incompatible
. with other development along Lexington Ave.
3. The site is proximate to established B-2 uses at Red Fox Rd. and
Lexington.
4. The least desirable B-2 uses can be controlled through the SUP process.
Moved by Babcook, seconded by Thorn, that Commisison
recommend to Council approval of the Rezoning of the parcel at Lexington Avenue
north of Grey Fox Road from 1-2 to B-2, Case No. 87-14, C.G. Rein Company,
based on the fact that there appears to be a demand for retail/service oriented
use of land in this area and the rezoning would not be incompatible or out of
character with other development along Lexington Avenue. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-10; Planner Miller reviewed the request for a front setback
FRONT SETBACK VAR. Variance for a house addition at 1305 Tiller Lane. He
1305 TILLER LANE noted that the houses along this block of Tiller Lane
are at or near the 38.5 foot existing setback of this
subject house. The applicant is requesting a 5.5 foot variance, therefore, the
setback of the southeast corner of the house, as well as the new garage/family
room wing would be 34.5 feet.
Miller explained that variances have sometimes been approved based on the
position of the existing house or for the constraints of its floor plan.
However, considering the uniformity of this block, granting a variance might
establish a new setback line by precident.
.
-.---
.
.
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 4
CASE NO. 87-10; Planner referred Commission members to Board of Appeals .
( CONTINUED) Minutes (4-23-87), recommending denial based on the
fact they could find no hardship in this case to
justify the variance and grating this variance may establish a new setback line
by precident. The Board suggested that the applicant could employ the help of
an architect to get a workable floor plan that could expand out the back of the
home, rather than the front.
Raymond and Pamela Shull, applicants, explained the interior physical layout of
their home prompted their expansion out. the front of the horne, rather than the
back. Pamela also stated the driveway is steep and the expansion would
eliminate some of the driveway slope. She noted other reasons for the request
were to help alleviate the dampness in tke basement of the home (noting their
son is asthmatic), elimination of two condemned fireplaces in the home, and the
contractor had stated that expansion from the back of the home would create
roofline problems.
Acting Chair Petersen asked Planner Miller if the homes across the street
maintained a 40 ft. setback.
Miller advised that those homes were granted a 5 ft. setback variance because
of poor soil conditions on the lots; the City was interested in minimizing the
amount of fill on the lots.
After discussion, the consensus of the Commission mambers was that they could
not determine a unique hardship for this request.
Moved by Malone, seconded by Zehrn, that Commission .
recommend to Council denial of the Front Setback Variance request, Case No.
87-10, 1305 Tiller Lane, Raymond and Pamela Shull, based on the fact that the
CommiSSion finds no significant hardship on the part of the applicant. Motion
carried unanimously, (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-11; The Planner reviewed his memorandum (4-10-87), and
MINOR SUBD!LOT explained the background of this parcel for Commission
WIDTH VARIANCE, members.
OAK AVE., TRAMM
Miller advised that the proposed lot will exceed the
14,000 sq. ft. area required by ordinance, however the subject property is an
odd-shaped parcel, with a front width of only 75 ft. at the front setback line,
therefore, the applicant is requesting a width variance of 20 ft, as well as
approval of the minor subdivision.
Planner stated that that an adequate building envelope exists and all setback
requirements can be met, therefore, no negative impacts on adjacent properties
are apparent. He further noted that the steepness of the slope on this lot will
require special treatment to achieve an acceptable driveway grade. The
applicant is working on a house plan which includes a tuck-under garage, to
reduce the driveway slope.
Miller referred Commission members to the Board of Appeals minutes (4-23-87)
recommending approval of the 20 ft. lot width variance. .
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 5
. CASE NO. 87-11; There was discussion relative to placement of the home
(CONTINUED ) in relation to the adjacent existing homes.
Kim Tramm, applicant, advised he had no problem with establishing the front
setback of the proposed home in line with the corners of the adjacent existing
homes.
Zehm moved, seconded by Petersen, that Commission
recommends to Council approval of the Minor Subdivision and associated Lot
Width Variance, Case No. 87-11, Oak Avenue, Kim Tramm, based on the following:
1. The large lot size compensates for the narrow frontage.
2. A flexible building envelope exists on the new lot.
3. Standard setbacks can be be provided.
4. No negative impact on adjacent properties is evident.
Furthermore, approval is subject to the front setback line of the proposed home
not exceeding the front setback line on the two adjacent property owners
existing homes. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
CASE NO. 87-12; Planner Miller reviewed his memorandum dated 4-10-87
SETBACK VARIANCE relative to the Front Setback variance and gave a
NO. OF LK.JOHANNA brief background of the minor subdivision previously
approved by Council.
. Miller noted the applicant's primary rationale for reducing the setback from
the west lot line relates to the steep slope at the rear of the lot. He noted
that if the 40 ft. setback is enforced, the rear of the house will be at the
base of the slope; to avoid drainage problems and create a usable rear yard,
moving the house west is considered desirable.
Commission members were referred to the Board of Appeals minutes (4-23-87)
recommending approval of the variance, based on the fact that without the
variance, the home would have little or no rear yard.
Planner Miller noted for Commission members that the Variance request was only
for this parcel, not for the adjacent lot as shown in his memorandum.
Mark Anderson, applicant, advised that the other parcel, adjacent to the south
of his property, will be purchased by a friend. Anderson stated that the
prospective owner has not developed a house plan for the parcel, therefore,
only the variance for Anderson's lot is being requested at this time. He also
advised that he had worked with an architect to determine where the home would
be best situated on the lot so that it would not affect the drainage pattern
and be compatible the the proposed home on the adjacent southerly lot.
The Planner identified the building envelope on the southerly adjacent lot and
noted that the existing homes to the south of the two vacant parcels are
approximately 10-15 ft. from the access easement.
Member Babcook stated he did not see a hardship; noted the Planner commented
. that the lot is buildable without granting a variance. Other members did not
agree; Petersen stated the slope of the land is justification of hardship.
----------- --------
.
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 6
CASE NO. 87-12: Moved by Petersen, seconded by Zehm, that Commission
(CONTINUED) recommends to Council approval of the 20 ft.Front .
Setback Variance on the lot north of Lake Johanna
Blvd. , Case No. 87-12, Mark Anderson: rationale for approval based on unique
topography of the land (steep slope at the north and east portions of the lot).
the fact that the adjacent properties will not be negatively impacted, and the
southerly existing homes front setbacks are 10-15 ft. thus granting the
variance would not establish setback precident.
Thorn moved to amend the motion. seconded by Petersen,
that approval be contingent upon the applicant satisfying all conditions
attached to the approval of the minor subdivision.
Amendment to the motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Original motion as amended carried. (Petersen, Zehm, Malone, Thorn voting in
favor; Babcook opposed) (4-1)
CASE NO. 87-15; Planner reviewed his memorandum (4-29-87), regarding
SITE PLAN REVIEW & the site plan review for Alpo Pet Food. Inc. and
SETBACK VARIANCE ; rear yard setback. He noted that the Ordinance requires
ALPO PET FOODS a 75 ft. setback from a residential zoning district for
any non-residential structure. Since the rear property
line of the subject property is the division between the I-I and R-l Districts.
a 75 ft. rear setback is required in this case. Hiller advised that the Zoning
Administrator had attempted to verify the zoning district boundary line,
however, she was unable to find information relative to the vacation. .
dedication or sale of the land that was proposed for use as Highway 51. The
Planner stated he would discuss the matter with the City Attorney to determine
the zoning district boundary line. Since this has not been verified, Miller
suggested the Commission deal with the site plan review issue and include a
contingency for the variance upon determination that it is necessary.
Planner stated that the applicant is proposing to construct a 17 ft. x 31 ft.
addition to the northwest corner of the existing building. The proposed
addition will be constructed of concrete block to match the present building
and will be 21 ft. high. Miller advised that the project engineer has provided
the following information regarding the construction and use of the proposed
addition:
- The building will house a tank for storage of liquid tallow.
- Location for the addition was chosen to allow convenient service access
and place the product storage near the place where it is needed in the
manufacturing process.
- The storage tank will be sealed and should not emit any additional odors.
- The addition will not involve installation of mechanical equipment on the
roof or adjacent to the building.
- An air intake vent will be installed at the northwest corner.
Commission members discussed the need for additional screening or plantings at
the rear of the site and if parking is adequate.
Miller advised that the site is well screened at the rear with mature or near .
mature trees; he also stated that the parking is more than adequate.
,
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, Hay 6, 1987
Page 7
. CASE NO. 87-15; Moved by Thorn, seconded by Malone, that Commission
(CONTINUED ) recommend to Council approval of the Site Plan Review
Case No, 87-15, Alpo Pet Foods, Inc., as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Moved by Babcook, seconded by Zehm, that Commission
recommend to Council approval of the 12 ft. Rear Setback Variance, based on the
fact that the 50-ft. pedestrian way mitigates any negative effects of the
encorachment upon adjacent properties. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
PRELIM. DISC. The Planner advised that Mr. Miller had requested
CUMMINGS PROP. placement on the.agenda for preliminary discussion of
the development of the Cummings property on Lexington
Avenue; northeast corner of Cummings Park. Miller stated that the parcel of
land is currently zoned R-l, with approximately 250 feet of frontage on
Lexington Avenue. Discussions with the developer included a proposal for
platting three lot single family lots, which may require some frontage
variances, although the lots would exceed the depth and area requirements.
Miller also discussed a cluster townhouse development, approximately 3.11
units per acre. (single family sale housing) which would require a special use
permit in this district. He noted that the density would have to be calculated,
excluding the water area on the parcel.
Bob Miller and Randy Hopkins, partners in the development of the parcel,
displayed a preliminary sketch of a cluster townhouse development on the land.
. The arrangement was for four units at the rear of the parcel (2 one-story units
and 2-two story units all attached) with a walkout design; and three attached
units on the southerly border of the property (2 one-story units and 1 2-story
unit). He discussed the topography of the land, referring to the steep slope at
the rear of the property.
Acting Chair Petersen asked if Miller had built this type of townhouse
development previously; commented that Commission would like to see the
development if so.
Randy Hopkins stated he had a townhouse development he constructed on Old
Shakopee Road. He advised the base price of the proposed units would be
$100,000.00.
Commission discussed the following items:
- Minimizing access onto Lexington; increased traffic.
- Impact on neighboring single-family residential area.
- Retention of land for park access.
- PUD development of this parcel; comparable to Hunters Park.
- Density calculation; preferred lower density.
- Common driveway access onto Lexington.
- Architectural quality of the development to enhance the area since it
is adjacent to single-family district.
- Applicant should consider a townhouse development based on the fact that
. there are no other workable options for Single-family development.
.
Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987
Page 8
CUMMINGS PROP. After discussion, Commission consensus was that the
( CONTINUED ) developer should pursue a single-family or low density .
proposal for this parcel; architectural quality should
be high if the plan is for cluster homes.
Commission members also advised that they realize this is a difficult parcel
and they would consider variances for a single-family design proposal on the
parcel to enhance the development of the land.
Planner Miller noted that the options for development of the parcel, without
granting variances, rezoning or granting a special use permit would be:
1- Leave land as is.
2. Develop the property as a single-family lot.
3. Subdivide the parcel into two single-family lots.
Bob Miller and Randy Hopkins thanked the Commission members for their review of
the preliminary proposal.
COUNCIL REPORT Councilrnember Winiecki reported on recent Council
actions on items of interest to the Planning members.
ADJOURNMENT Moved by Zehm, seconded by Thorn, that the meeting
adjourn at 10:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
.
Acting Chairman Scott Petersen
.
----------
ARDEN HILLS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Program Activity Proposal
. 1986 Summer ProRram 1987 Proposed Summer ProRram
Youth Youth
Soccer (K-2nd Gr.) - Soccer (K-2nd Gr.)
Boys' and Girls' Boys' and Girls'
Tennis Instruction Tennis Instruction
Golf Instruction Golf Instruction
Swimming Lessons (Lake Johanna) Swimming Lessons (Lake Johanna)
Boys' and Girls' T-Ball (K-2nd Gr.) Boys' and Girls' T-Ball (K-2nd Gr.)
Softball Leagues Softball Leagues
3rd-4th Gr. Boys'/Girls' Leagues 3rd-4th Gr. Boys'/Girls' Leagues
5th-6th Gr. Boys'/Girls' Leagues 5th-6th Gr. Boys'/Girls' Leagues
Jnr. High Boys/Girls' Leagues Jnr. High Girls' Leagues
High School League (Girls) High School League (Girls)
Adaptive Recreation
Tap, Ballet, Jazz and Acrobatics
Summer PlaYRround Summer Playground
Pre-School Program (Mornings) Pre-School Program (Mornings)
Elementary and Jnr. High (Afternoons) Elementary and Jnr. High (Afternoons)
Adventure Trips Adventure Trips
Adults Adults
Tennis Lessons Tennis Lessons
Golf Lessons Golf Lessons
Men's Softball Leagues Men's Softball Leagues
Women's Softball Leagues Women's Softball Leagues
. Co-Rec Softball Leagues Co-Rec Softball Leagues
Jazzercise Jazzercise
Community Gardening Seniors' Tap Dancing
Community Gardening
Other Other
Zig Kauls' Basketball Clinic Zig Kauls' Basketball Clinic
Girls' Basketball Clinic Girls' Basketball Clinic
Football Clinic Football Clinic
Youth Gymnastics Youth Gymnastics
Open Track Meets Open Track Meets
Aquatic Program Aquatic Program
Northstar Daycamp Northstar Daycamp
District 621 Senior Program District 621 Senior Program
Bethel College Facilities Bethel College Facilities
.
...
,
. MEMORANDUM
Date: May 6, 1987
To Arden Hills Council
From: John T. Buckley, Parks Director
Subject: 1987 Summer Playground Staff
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am recommending that the following individuals be hired as play leaders
for the summer programs:
Cheryl Madson Fregeau, Summer Program Supervisor
4750 - 106th Lane N.E.
Circle Pines, MN 55014
785-1632
Recommended salary - $170.00 per week. (1986 salary - $160.00 per week). -~;
Ms. Fregeau will receive mileage for the use of her car. She will be ,~
employed June 8 through July 31.L..~~~1~ 'OlbOI.A..w-\. 30~' ~
t> $;~(,I .
Vanda Biorklund, Summer Play Leader
. 7880 Eastwood Road
Moundsview, MN 55432
780-2358
Recommended salary - $4.35 per hour. (1986 program leaders received $4.25
per hour). She will be employed June 11 through July 24.
Andrea Thorson, Summer Play Leader
4465 Cumberland Court
Shoreview, MN 55126
484-6981
Recommended Salary - $4.35 per hour.
Christine Doocy, Summer Play Leader
43 North Road
Circle Pines, MN 55014
786-2169
Recommended Salary - $4.35 per hour.
Amy Hansen, Summer Play Leader
8305 Westbond Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
544-2434
. Recommended Salary - $4.35 per hour.
,
-
.
Brief BackRround of Summer PlaYRround Leaders
. Cheryl Madson Fregeau - Ms. Fregeau worked as Program Supervisor during
the summers of 1984, 1985 and 1986. She is a graduate of Bethel College.
She is presently completing her second year of teaching elementary
students at a church school in Coon Rapids.
Vonda Bjorklund - Ms. Bjorklund is presently the Director of Intramurals
at Bethel College. Other responsibilities at Bethel include physical
education instructort basketball and tennis coach.
Andrea Thorson - Ms. Thorson is a sophomore at the University of Wisconsin
- Eau Claire. She is majoring in elementary education, She has been a
teacher's aid at Montessori school - is active in Young Life groups.
Christine Doocy - Ms. Doocy is completing her freshman year at
Anoka-Ramsey Community College. She is an elementary education major.
She has worked for two summers as a Day Camp Counselor for the Northwest
YMCA.
Amy Hansen - Ms. Hansen is completing her freshman year at Bethel College.
She is majoring in elementary education. She has leadership experience at
Church camps, Bible school, Sunday school and coaching youth teams.
.
.
~
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4IlOSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 81. Perform flood control activities
(e.g. , sandbagging, dike-building.
rip-rapping river banks).
2 82. Assist iq performing simple
arithmetic computations (e.g.,
addition, subtraction,
multiplication, division).
1 83. Assist in recruiting candidates
for employment.
1 84. Assist in recommending hiring of
job applicants for full-timej
permanent jobs.
2 85. Assist in recommending hiring of
job applicants for part-timej
. seasonaljtemporary jobs.
2 86. Assist in providing input to
superiors about the job performance
of employees.
. -8-
~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS POSITION DESCRIPTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May, 1987
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
POSITION TITLE
OF IMMEDIATE
SUPERVISOR:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES OF POSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR TASK AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY
ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF TIME;
PRIORITIES AND FREEDOM TO ACT
.% of Time Priority Tasks
3 1. Perform manual labor functions
involved in the installation of
sanitary or storm sewer system
(e.g., may include come use of
small hand tools).
3 2. Repair lift station pumps.
2 3. Clean lift station.
1 4. Repair sewer mains, valves,
regulators.
1 5. Assist with repair of sanitary/
storm sewer lines.
2 6. Assist with raising/lowering/
rebuilding manhole castings to
grade.
2 7. Assist with bUi1ding/replacing/
maintaining storm sewer catch
. basins/field drains.
-1-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~SITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May. 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
5 8. Assist in jetting/roddingl
flushing sanitary and storm
sewers.
2 9. Assist in unpluging sewer
line.
10. Assist in clean up of land
due to sewer malfunction.
11. Assist in clean up of residence
due to sewer malfunction.
1 12. Install water lines and service
lines using manual labor.
1 13. Assist in installing hydrants
and valves (e.g., gate, foot,
. check).
3 14. Assist in operating fire
hydrants (e.g., flush water
lines. watering) .
2 15. Assist in check services for
leaks and pressure.
2 16. Assist in performing water
system repair in emergency
situations.
3 17. Assist in installing remote
reading device.
3 18. Assist in clearing and grubbing
site using light equipment.
2 19. Clear and grub site manually
(e.g., cutting trees).
2 20. Assist in rough-grading site
using light equipment.
. -2-
---------
4It--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 21. Assist in placing and compacting
fill materials using light
equipment.
3 22. Assist in performing finish
grading using light equipment.
2 23. Assist in placing base materials
using light equipment.
1 24. Place/remove concrete forms using
light equipment.
1 25. Assist in pouring/finishing
concrete.
1 26. Assist in grading gravel streets/
. roads/alleys using light equipment.
27. Sweep or wash streets/parking lots/
sidewalks using light equipment.
1 28. Assist in cutting ice from sidewalks/
streets/parking lots using light
equipment.
2 29. Assist in preparing surfaces for
repairs (e.g., fill and compact)
using light equipment.
2 30. Install/repair signs and barricades.
2 31. Assist in performing crack sealing
on streets and parking lots using
light equipment.
3 32. Assist in performing minor blacktop
patching on streets and parking lots
using light equipment.
1 33. Assist in performing minor concrete
repair on streets and parking lots
. using hand held tools.
-3-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 34. Install/construct athletic fields,
courts (e.g., baseball, football,
soccer, tennis, volleyball ,
horseshoe, basketball) using
light equipment.
1 35. Install playground and related
equipment.
1 36. Assist in installing recreational
buildings (e.g., mobile) using
light equipment.
2 37. Prepare ground for seed/sod/
plantings (e.g., top dressing,
soil modifications) with manual
labor.
1 38. Lay sod.
. 2 39. Seed manually
1 40. Mow/aerate lawns, golf courses,
street borders, fields, ditches,
using light equipment.
2 41. Maintain trees, shrubs, plants
(e.g., on-ground trimming, brush
removal, watering, weeding).
2 42. Perform aerial tree trimming with
saddle and rope.
1 43. Plant/transplant trees
2 44. Assist in removal/disposal of
diseased/dead trees, shrubs, plants,
and related debris according to
requirements (includes operations of
a burn site) using heavy equipment.
. -4-
-----------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"'OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May. 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
2 45. Assist in removal/disposal of
diseased/dead trees, shrubs,
plants, and related debris
according to requirements
(includes operations of a burn
site) using light equipment.
4 46. Assist in performing preventive
maintenance (e.g. , identify
potential problems) on vehicle
motorized equipment.
3 47. Assist in performing routine
maintenance (oil, refrigerant,
lubrication, tire change,
batteries) on small engines and
engine components.
. 3 48. Assist in performing routine
maintenance (oil, refrigerant,
lubrication, tire change, batteries)
on heavy equipment.
4 49. Assist in performing driver-type
vehicle maintenance (e.g., check
oil level, windshield washer fluid,
air in tires).
2 50. Paint/waterproof/rustproof equipment.
2 51. Assist in diagnosis/repair of
miscellaneous items or tools.
2 52. Assist in communicating vehicle/
equipment maintenance and weldings
policies, procedures, and practices
to supervisors, lead people, and
crew.
2 53. Maintain/repair/replace drinking
fountains/plumbing (e.g., sinks,
toilets, drains, lines, valves).
. -5-
----.-
.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May. 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" of Time Priority Tasks
2 54. Maintain/repair plumbing and
fixtures (e.g. , sinks, toilets,
drains, lines, valves).
2 55. Assist in cleaning and repair of
pumps (i.e., sump pumps,
circulating pumps).
2 56. Unclog and clean sanitary and
storm drains.
2 57. Assist in determining cause(s)
of malfunction in lighting
equipment or systems.
2 58. Assist in installing/replacing
minor equipment (e.g., ballasts,
light switches, writing, fuses,
. cables, cords, circuit breakers,
light fixtures) in lighting
equipment or systems.
1 59. Mop/sweep and wax floors.
1 60. Maintain and disinfect restroom/
locker room/bath house fixtures.
1 61. Empty wastebaskets.
3 62. Clean/disinfect well houses/lift
stations/substations and other
structures.
3 63. Pick up litter/empty trash containers
on any city/public land (e.g., parks,
roadways, trails, grounds) using
manual labor.
1 64. Sand, salt sidewalks/steps/small
areas.
1 65. Perform flag responsibilities (e.g.,
display/maintain pole).
. -6-
.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4ItpOSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER I Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
',t of Time Priority Tasks
1 66. Prepare supplies and equipment
for election (clean out machines,
etc.) .
1 67. Set-up mechanical voting machine
and booth.
2 68. Replace and repair door locks,
light bulbs, and similar items.
2 69. Perform seasonal projects (e.g. ,
put up holiday decorations).
1 70. Jack/transport/set permanent
structures.
1 71. Assist with layout, installation
of cabinets/shelves/doors/windows.
. 1 72. Assist with installation/repair of
roofing and siding.
2 73. Mix/match paints and stains.
2 74. Prepare surface (e.g., washing,
sanding, scraping) for painting.
2 75. Sandblast surfaces for painting.
2 76. Prime, paint, stain, varnish seal
surfaces.
1 77. Layout and apply street traffic/
airport markings with various
types of paint, machinery and
stencils.
3 78. Install/remove snow fences.
2 79. Manually dig holes/trenches/
graves.
2 80. Shovel/snowblow (e.g., steps/
. walks).
-7-
, ~/
/ ~ o.<S,l.
.- ,,--;:~-~
U'
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS POSITION DESCRIPTION
~---------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
POSITION TITLE
OF IMMEDIATE
SUPERVISOR:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES OF POSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR TASK AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY
ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF TIME;
PRIORITIES AND FREEDOM TO ACT
% of Time Priority Tasks
. 1 1. Operate heavy equipment involved
in the installation of sanitary
or storm sewer system.
1 2. Operate light equipment involved
in the installation of sanitary
or storm sewer system.
3. Serve a lead person (e.g., provide
short-term work direction to
sewer installation crew).
4 4. Operate liftstation pumps.
4 5. Monitor flow, back pressure readings,
draw down and level.
4 6. Troubleshoot/maintain lift station
pumps.
4 7. Inspection lift station.
8. Serve as lead person (e.g., provide
short-term work direction to lift
. station crew).
-1-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
41rOSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
3 9. Locate sewer/storm sewer lines.
1 10. Make service tap into sewer line.
1 II. Repair sanitary/storm sewer line.
4 12. Locate manholes.
2 13. Raise/lower/rebuild manhole
castings to grade.
2 14. Build/replace/maintain storm sewer
catch basins/field drains.
5 15. Jet/rod/flush sanitary and storm
sewers.
4 16. Monitor/maintain/repair sewer alarm
. system.
2 17. Unplug sewer line.
18. Clean up land due to sewer
malfunction.
3 19. Reinstate lift station (e.g. , unplug
pumps, correct electrical outages).
1 20. Install hydrants and valves (e.g. ,
gate, foot, check) .
3 2I. Maintain/repair water lines and
service lines.
3 22. Maintain/repair hydrants/valves (e.g.,
gate, foot, check) .
3 23. Operate fire hydrants (e.g. , flush
water lines, watering) .
3 24. Maintain/monitor water towers.
. -2-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
-
3 25. Maintain/monitor water pumping
facilities.
2 26. Check services for leaks and
pressure.
2 27. Perform water system repair in
emergency situations.
2 28. Serve as lead person (provide
short-term work direction to
water system repair crew).
3 29. Plan, develop, evaluate, and
recommend water, sewer, or gas
system policies, procedures,
and practices.
. 5 30. Monitor existing planes) to ensure
overall effectiveness.
4 31. Make recommendations on water,
sewer, or gas policies, procedures,
and practices.
3 32. Install meters/regulators/test or
usage recording equipment (includes
meter sealing).
3 33. Install remote reading device.
3 34. Remove/reset meters, regulators, and
usage recording equipment.
3 35. Repair/test/calibrate/condensate
meters, regulators, and usage recording
equipment.
3 36. Read/estimate/record usage from meters.
2 37. Determine cause for unusual reading.
. -3-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
..~-~_..__. -,.~.-
1 52. Sweep or wash streets/parking
lots/curbs/sidewalks using heavy
equipment.
4 53. Plow sidewalks/streets/parking
lots/parking ramps using heavy
equipment.
4 54. Plow sidewalks/streets/parking
lots/parking ramps using light
equipment.
2 55. Cut ice from sidewalks/streets/
parking lots using heavy equipment.
1 56. Cut ice from sidewalks/streets/
parking lots using light equipment.
. 3 57. Apply sand/salt with motorized vehicle.
1 58. Prepare surfaces for repairs (e.g.,
fill and compact) using heavy
equipment.
2 59. Prepare surfaces for repairs (e.g. ,
fill and compact) using light
equipment.
2 60. Perform crack sealing on streets and
parking lots using light equipment.
3 61. Perform minor blacktop patching on
streets and parking lots using light
equipment.
1 62. Perform minor concrete repair on streets
and parking lots using hand held tools.
2 63. Serve as lead person (e.g., provide
short-term work direction to gravel or
paved surface maintenance crew).
. -5-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4IlOSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May. 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 64. Construct trails (biking, hiking,
skiing, jogging) using heavy
equipment.
1 65. Install recreational buildings
(e.g., mobile) using heavy
equipment.
2 66. Remove/dispose of diseased/dead
trees, shrubs, plants, and related
debris according to requirements
(includes operation of a burn site)
using heavy equipment.
2 67. Remove/dispose of diseased/dead
trees, shrubs, plants, and related
debris according to requirements
. (includes operation of a burn site)
using light equipment.
3 68. Determine type and scope of repairs
needed to vehicle motorized equipment.
2 69. Advise on repairing, selling, modifying,
or trading of equipment.
4 70. Perform preventive maintenance (e.g.,
identify potential problems) to vehicle
motorized equipment.
3 71. Perform routine maintenance (oil ,
refrigerant, lubrication, tire change,
batteries) to vehicle motorized
equipment.
1 72. Repair/adjust/replace electrical
systems.
2 73. Repair/adjust/replace hydraulic
systems.
1 74. Repair/adjust/replace mechanical
. systems.
-6-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
-<-< ----
3 75. Perform routine maintenance (oil,
refrigerant, lubrication, tire
change, batteries) on automotive
equipment.
1 76. Repair/adjust/replace electrical
systems on automotive equipment.
1 77. Repair/adjust/replace fuel
systems on automotive equipment.
2 78. Repair/adjust/replace hydraulic
systems on automotive equipment.
1 79. Repair/adjust/replace mechanical
systems on automotive equipment.
. 1 80. Overhaul/adjust diesel engines on
automotive equipment.
1 81. Overhaul/adjust gas engines on
automotive equipment.
3 82. Perform routine maintenance (oil,
refrigerant, lubrication, tire
change, batteries) on heavy
equipment.
2 83. Repair/adjust/replace electrical
systems on heavy equipment.
2 84. Repair/adjust/replace fuel systems
on heavy equipment.
3 85. Repair/adjust/replace hydraulic
systems on heavy equipment.
1 86. Repair/adjust/replace mechanical
systems on heavy equipment.
1 87. Overhaul/adjust diesel engines on
heavy equipment.
. -7-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
4 88. Perform driver-type vehicle
maintenance (e.g., check oil
level, windshield washer fluid,
air in tires).
2 89. Determine need and function of
specialized equipment.
3 90. Design/implement minor modifications
to existing equipment (mufflers,
lights, radios) .
2 91- Design/implement major modifications
to existing equipment, rebuild or
build equipment from scratch (e.g. ,
trailers, snow removal equipment,
ice scrapers, weed conveyors).
. 2 92. Diagnose/repair miscellaneous items
or tools.
I 93. Perform soldering and brazing.
I 94. Perform horizontal (flat) welding.
I 95. Perform electrical arc welding.
2 96. Develop long- and short-range
operational plans for the vehicle/
equipment maintenance, and welding
departments.
I 97. Plan. develop, evaluate, and recommend
vehicle/equipment maintenance and
welding policies, procedures, and
practices.
5 98. Monitor existing plan(s) to ensure
overall effectiveness.
3 99. Make recommendations to vehicle/
equipment maintenance and weldings
. policies, procedures and practices.
-8-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
~OSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
-
2 100. Communicate vehicle/equipment
maintenance and weldings policies,
and practices to supervisors, lead
people, a,nd crew.
1 101. Monitor/adjust overhead heaters
and gas furnaces for proper
operation/gas leaks.
2 102. Clean and repair pumps (i.e. ,
sump pumps, circulating pumps).
4 103. Monitor existing plans to insure
overall effectiveness.
3 104. Make recommendations to maintenance
policies, procedures, and practices.
. 2 105. Determine cause(s) of malfunction of
lighting equipment or systems.
2 106. Install/replace minor equipment (e.g.,
ballasts, light switches, wiring, fuses,
cables, cords, circuit breakers, light
fixtures).
1 107. Install/monitor/maintain programmable
control panels for lighting equipment
or systems.
1 108. Install/monitor/maintain photo cells/
time clocks for lighting equipment or
systems.
1 109. Perform work on unenergized systems.
1 110. Perform work on energized systems.
2 111. Install/monitor/maintain emergency
back-up systems (e.g., battery,
generator) for lights and emergency
systems.
. -9-
411--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 112. Layout, install, cabinets/shelves/
doors/windows.
1 113. Installation/repair roofing and siding.
1 114. Layout and apply street traffic/
airport markings with various types
of paint, machinery, and stencils.
2 115. Haul materials using heavy equipment.
1 116. Install/maintain alarm systems (police,
fire, metal detectors, money changers).
1 117. Install/maintain civil defense sirens.
1 118. Direct employees/individuals to secure
. areas (e.g., adverse weather, fire,
city, civil defense activities).
1 119. Lock/unlock facilities, offices,
housing.
1 120. Determine and insure maintenance of
appropriate inventory levels.
1 121- Participate in taking an inventory of
materials, supplies, equipment,
merchandise, land, etc.
1 122. Assist others in preparing budgets
(e.g. , compile data and supportive
material, prepare a portion of the
budget).
2 123. Perform simple arithmetic computations
(e.g. , addition, subtraction,
mul tiplica tion, division).
1 124. Compute simple statistics (e.g. , means,
medians, percentages, standard deviations,
distributions).
. -10-
4Ii:::::::-:::::~--:::::::::::-::::::-::---------::::~--::~~-:::~------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
1 125. Recruit candidates for employment.
1 126. Recommend hiring of job applicants
for full-time/permanent jobs.
2 127. Recommend hiring of job applicants
for part-time/seasonal/temporary
jobs.
2 128. Assign tasks/projects or areas of
responsibility to employees and
volunteers, organize workloads,
availability to meet completion
schedule (e.g., define, delegate).
2 129. Provide input to superiors about the
job performance of employees.
. 2 130. Conduct on-the-job training (e.g. ,
work/safety procedure, job function,
etc.) .
5 131. Greet public and acquaint them
with facility and services provided.
3 132. Answer routine inquiries regarding
hours, locations, general procedures,
etc.
3 133. Refer routine inquiries to appropriate
source (internal or external).
2 134. Receive and resolve initial complaints
regarding jurisdiction's services
(e.g., refuse collection, snow plowing,
tree removal, etc.).
2 135. Write routine correspondence and reports
such as memos, inquiries, and status/
activity reports.
3 136. Document procedures, minutes, events,
. practices, etc.
-11-
.
411--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSITION TITLE: MAINTENANCE WORKER II Date: May, 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of Time Priority Tasks
2 137. Document inspections/audits/
investigations/utility installations/
examinations making recommendations.
3 138. Attend department, project, or
interdepartmental meetings.
2 139. Attend classes or seminars.
2 140. Establish methods for recording
information (e.g. , log books,
sign-out sheets, directories).
3 141. Determine what should be recorded.
3 142. Record and maintain forms/logs/lists.
.
.
-12-
MANUAL CHECKS DATED 05/11/87
. 7333 --- BRAUSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. ---------------------- 5.84
Apri 1 Gas Purchase
7334 --- BRIGHTON EXCAVATING CD. ------------------------ 24.00
Black Dirt - Curb Repair
7335 --- CAPITOL SALES COMPANY, INC. -------------------- 390.95
#21 - Regency Radio, #4 - Radio Repair
7336 --- METROPOLITAN INSPECTION SERVICE, INC. ---------- 1,169.68
Electrical Inspections - April
7337 --- MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION -------------------- 401.48
22.16 Tons AC Fine
7338 --- NORTHERN STATES POWER -------------------------- 433.52
Street Lighting
7339 --- XIOMARA UGARTE ----------~---------------------- 371.25
Dance Class - 27 Students/13.75
7340 --- METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION ---------- 1,559.25
Sac Remittance - April
7341 --- LAWRENCE E. SQUIRES ---------------------------- 1,591.00
Bilding Inspections & Mileage - March & April
7342 --- HCO AUTO STORE --------------------------------- 77 .00
April Purchases
7343 --- NORTHWESTERN BELL ------------------------------ 313.14
Invoices Dated 04/28/87
7344 --- SCHERER BROS. LUMBER COMPANY ------------------- 30.00
Stakes for Community Gardens
7345 --- NORTHERN STATES POWER -------------------------- 41.89v
. 3484 Ridgewood Road 60.00"'"
7346 --- CONTRACTOR'S EXCHANGE, INC. --------------------
Disc Rental - Cummings Park
7347 --- JAMES S. LYNDEN -------------------------------- 1,409.05"/
7348 --- JAMES S. LYNDEN -------------------------------- 665.90/
Invoices for April
7349 --- METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION ---------- 157.93'"
Industrial Sewer Strength Charges, CDC, 1Q87
7350 --- WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES, INC. ---------------- 1,776.56 ~
Professional Services 03/26 - 04/25
7351 --- SANITATION STATIONS ---------------------------- 112.00~
April Service
10,590.44
.
------.-
~ C I T Y o F A R DEN H ILL S
, PIE 5/11/87 ACCOUNTS PAY A 8 L E PAGE 1
VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
NO. TYPE DAre NO. AMOUNT
.
06062 WI LlI AM BERGUF M 4121/87 07219 250.00
MANUAL CHECKS --- TYPE TOTAL 250.00
)
CHECK VDIDED -------------------------------- 07280 i
00070 RICHARO N ALQUIST II 5/ll/87 01281 558.00
00100 AMERICAN STORES R 5/11/87 01282 16.08
00183 BEACON PRODUCTS CO It 5/11/81 01283 231.00
00198 BOYER FORO TRUCKS It 5/11/81 01284 32.849.81
00230 BRIGHTON VET HOSPITAL R 5/ll/87 01285 91.00
00249 BUILDERS SQUARE It 5/ll/81 01286 131.64
00218 CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL It 5/11/81 01281 182.92
00280 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT R 5/11/87 07288 58.28
00298 ClUTCH & TRANSMISSION SVC R 5/11/81 01289 61.10
00310 COAST TO COAST II 5/11/81 01290 13.74
00450 GALLAGHERS SERVICE INC II 5/11/81 01291 121.63
00510 GOPHER SIGN COMPANY II 5/11/81 07292 682.21
00550 GREENHAVEN PRINTING II 5/11/81 01293 115.00 i
00611 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE R 5/11/81 012~ 1.056.03
00630 .J C AUTO SUPPLY R 5/11/81 01295 33.90
00660 LTG TRAI1.S R 5/11/81 01296 66.50
G0108 LAWSON PRODUCTS IHe R 5/11/81 01291 212.59
.00112 LEAGUE OF MN INSURANCE R 5/11/81 01298 2.602.8a
G0150 LILLIE-SUe NEWSPAPERS INC R 5/11/81 01299 40.02
00160 JAMES S L YNOEN R 5/11/87 01300 1.ll4.35
00161 JAMES S LYNDEN R 5/11/81 01301 1.406.85
00800 M B SUPPLY R 5/11/117 01302 331.84 !
00890 MINAR FORO IHe II 5/11/87 01303 68.58
00932 MINNESDTA MUTUAL LIFE R 5/11/81 01304 321.45
00990 MINN U.C. fUND R 5/11/81 013~5 50.61
01099 NORTH COUNTRY flAGS R 5/11/81 01306 105.25
01113 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS R 5/11/81 01307 36.28
01120 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 5/11/81 01308 553.13
01121 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 5/11/81 01309 815.28
01122 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 5/11/81 01310 711.33
01123 NORTHERN STATES POWER R 5/11/81 07311 315.69
01140 NOR.EST BANK MINNEAPOLIS R 5/11/87 01312 62.120.00 f
01220 PETTY CASH R 5/11/81 07313 142.00 ,
01280 PO S Ji'lAS TER R 5.111/87 0131~ 200.00 I
01290 POSTMASTER-5J PAUL R 5/11/81 01315 200.00
01310 PROFESSIONAL PROCESS IHe R 5/11/81 01316 55. 14
01329 RAMSEY COUNTY R 5/11/81 01317 29.630.28 I
01340 RAY-KO OFFICE PRODUCTS R 5/11/87 01318 09.34 ,
01385 ARCHIE ROMSlO R 5/11/87 07319 75.00 !
01410 THE ROSEVlllE BANK R 5/11/81 01320 71.96
01434 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS IHe R 5/11/87 07321 444.00
01435 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION R 5/11/81 01322 64.00
01448 ST PAUl STEEL SUPPLY INC R 5/11/81 01323 34.28
.01460 SUE IRWIN SCHROEDER It 5/11/81 01324 132.00 I
!
. C I T Y o F ARDEN HILLS
PIE 5/11/87 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 2
,
VENDOR NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
NO. TYPE DATE HO. AMOUNT
.
01470 SCHUTTAS HARDWARE R 5/11/87 07325 94.61
01500 SHORT-ELLIOT HENDRICKSON It 5/11/87 07326 16,928.03
01520 SHUTTUPRI NT It 5/11/87 07327 36.80
01540 THE SNELLING CD R 5/11/87 01328 8~.00
01600 PERA It 5/11/87 01329 737.16
01820 WARNING LITES INC R 5/11/87 07330 ~O.OO
06004 WESTERN BRICK & STONE R 5/11/87 07331 116. H
06115 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPINKLER It 5/11/87 01332 30.00
, REGULAR CHECKS ---- TYPE TOTAL 156,602.97
!
MAY AlP ---------------- TOTAL 156.852.97
.
,
I
;
'.
-- -- ----------
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
CHECK REGISTER AS OF 04/26/87 1st MAY PAYROLL
REG. 0, T.
. CK. # CK. DATE EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS NET FiR5.'" HRS.
13312 VOID
13313 VOID
13314 VOID
13315 VOID
13316 05/12/87 JANE LUND 704.80 499.95 80
13317 05/12/87 SHIRLEY MARSHALL 556.80 287.53 80
13318 05/12/87 DARLENE SCOTT 552.80 357.70 80
13319 05/12/87 CATHERINE IAGO 1009.60 684.56 80
13320 05/12/87 PATRICIA MORRISON 1346.40 594.43 80
13321 05/12/87 MICHAEL MCKINNEY 1090.40 755.00 80
13322 05/12/87 R.WAYNE BRUNETTE 1042.40 594.96 80
13323 05/12/87 FRED REED 1042.40 751.28 80
13324 05/12/87 MICHAEL SCHIFSKY 1042.40 755.03 80
13325 05/12/87 DANIEL WINKEL 1052.17 663.68 80 .50
13326 05/12/87 STEPHEN ZEHM 55.60 51.42 8
13327 05/12/87 RO BERT RADDATZ 1335.20 912.67 80
13328 05/12/87 JOSEPH MOONEY 938.40 701.65 80
13329 05/12/87 JOHN BUCKLEY 1221.60 895.93 80
13330 05/12/87 FREDERICK BELL 927.20 630.56 80
13331 05/12/B7 DAVID WINKEL 927.20 521. 38 80
13332 05/12/87 KEVIN FULLER 800.00 539.45 80
13333 05/12/87 RICHARD CIEMINSKI 221. 81 178.39 41
15867.18 10375.57
.
WITHHELD FROM MAY PAYROLL
13334 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (FIT) ---------- 1842.78
13335 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (FICA) --------- 1056.03
13336 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
ASSOCIATION --------------------------- 674.17
13337 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION -------------- 200.00
13338 lCMA RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION ------------- 685.00
4457.98
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS 13312 THROUGH 13338 ~14:83~.;~~
--. --------
.
5/ II dnu.t& ~L~"
---- --
, , s/!II~? "
.. ~
...
. 101 (j -Ij:.~ o~~
.
April 11+, '987 77Q-1I78
Mr. Donald Chrlatofferson
ShOl't-Elllott-HendrlclcllOll, Inc.
CDnlIU'tlng Engineers
222 East Little Caneda RD8d
St. Paul. Mlnnaaota 55117
CBar Mr. Chrlatoffereon:
SUBJECT: S. P. e12Bl+-II'(35'w'J
Cone. Pave. Rep, I> Guerdrall
Ravi"ona fram C.R. C In RDII8vllle
to Co. Rd. "n Arden Hille
Refl!rence ia mede to Patricia Morrlaon's. Clerk/Adminlstrater fOl' the City
of Arden Hille. lett.r of April 7. ,gB7, regerdlng conetructlon .etlvltlea fOl'
the above refer.nced ..."j.ct.
. Construction III echadul.d to begin on Tueld.y. July 7. Ige7. ac 10:00 A.M. end
continue through August 21. 11387. The contract requll'llll chet tha contractor
work ehe d8ye e weak. axeludlng Sundaya. elxtaart hours par day. An Incentive
paymtmt of 810,000 per.. Gel.nder day III. baing offerad fOl' completion of the
work prlOl' to the August 21, 1ge7 completion data. The contreotor will be __d
.'0.000 per calendar day In dameou 'f he falle to complate the work by AugUSt
2,.,gB7.
In ragard to tha queltlon about lta"lng of conlltructlon actlvltl... I have encloeed
. copy of the Tlma end Traffic Pravl"ons. wh'ch will hopafully .nswar all of
your que8tlonll end coneeme.
You will be Invited to attend the pre-construction conference which lit expectad
to bahald approxlm8taly mid June.
If you have any further queetlons. ple_ contact Jim Miner. Ruldant Engineer,
or Dan And_Fl. Project Engineer. at 2g7-1+5BO.
Sincerely.
Karmlt K. McRae. P.E.
Dilltrlct Engln..r
. Encloeure
cc:
PatrIcia MorrIson - City of Arden Hille
1450 W. HIGHWAY 96, ARDEN HillS. MINNESOTA 55112 633.5676
April 7, 1987
Mr. Kermit K. McRae, P.E.
District Engineer .
Mn/Dot, District 9
3485 Hadley Avenue N.
Box 9050
North St. Paul, Mn. 55109
SUBJECT: S.P. 6284-111 (T.H. 35W) Concrete Pavement Repair and
Guardrail Revisions from County Road "c" in Roseville
to County Road "I" in Arden Hills
Dear Mr. McRae:
. We appreciated receiving preliminary consttuction plans for the
above referenced project. We have reviewed the pLans and have
some questions.
The proposed reconstruction will obviously create significant
traffic delays and congestion on the freeway which will in turn
place significant additional demands on adjacent roadways
including city streets. This diversion of traffic will create
some obvious delays for Arden Hills residents and will subject
some of them to additional traffic.
We recognize that the work must be done and that the delays are
inevitable. The city would like to have aditional information
relative to the estimated time of construction, for each of the
stages. as well as the restrictions that will be placed upon th
contractor's activities. We are interested in the hours that the
contractor will be permitted to work and any incentives which
might he offered to shorten the time of construction.
Would you kindly contact our consulting engineers, Short-Elliott-
Hendrickson, when the information is available.
Sin~lY'
/ -. ~----n'
( l~ A(c/;;;J. "I.-;uW,,6.,rU
. Patricia j~orrison
Clerk Administrator
cc: Short-Elliott-Hendrickson
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HEN DRICKSON, INC.
SEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
. ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA . CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN
'\-,' 1987
To: Pat Morrison
City of Arden Hills
1450 W, Hiqhway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Re: Arden Hills, - I 35W Re,
GENTLEMEN:
We are KI Enclosing o Sending Under ~
1 copv Time and Traffic Revisions
.
For Your With Our
RJ Information o Approval o Approval
o Records o Distribution o Approval with Corrections
o Please Return-Corrected Prints o Disapproval
REMARKS:
.
Barry Peters
By
200 GOPHER BUILDING. 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA. 55117. PHONE (612) 484-0272
Ulcc.. v.
f(i~ _,1 ~.." ' .-.... .. v"
.. \. :-:. -~-" : ~-'" !. . 6,vr.u -
Minnesota " . ,
::'::.T :,.... , ....,.,~....;~ ~Cp
>> '< Department of Transportation
. \+~ ~I District 9
3485 Hadley Avenue North
OF T\\"~ Oakdale, Minnesota 55109
ST. PAUL
Apri I 1'1, 1987 779-1178
Telephone
Mr. Donald Christofferson 'j -
Short-Ell iott-Hendri ~kson. In~. i -\ i'''' ....-.. '!'- . .. ,. .
Consulting Engineers 'Ji:f:;-;':~ '='..1..'<':; !;
222 East Little Canada Road
St. Paul. Minnesota 55117 "
/
Dear Mr. Christofferson:
SUBJECT: S. P. 628'1-111(35""] ST. P,4UL
Con~. Pave. Rep. [; Guardrail
Revisions from C.R. C in Roseville
to Co. Rd. I in Arden Hills
Reference is made to Patri~ia Morrison's. Clerkl Administrator for the City
of Arden Hills. letter of April 7. 1987. regarding constru~tion a~tivities for
the above referenced proje~t.
. Constru~tion is s~heduled to be9in on Tuesday. July 7. 1987. at 10:00 A.M. and
~ontinue through August 21. 1987. The ~ontract requires that the ~ontra~tor
work six days a week. excludin9 Sundays. sixteen hours per day. An In~entive
payment of $10.000 per calendar day is being offered for completion of the
work prior to the August 21. 1987 completion date. The contra~tor will be assessed
$10.000 per ~alendar day in damages if he fails to ~omplete the work by August
21. 1987.
In regard to the question about staging of ~onstruction activities. I have enclosed
a ~opy of the Time and Traffi~ Provisions. whi~h will hopefully answer all of
your questions and ~on~erns.
You will be invited to attend the pre-~onstru~tion ~onferen~e whi~h is expe~ted
to be held approximately mid June,
If you have any further questions. please contact Jim Miner. Resident Engineer,
or Den Anderson. Project Engineer. at 297-'1580.
Sincerely.
e~~
Kermit K. McRae. P.E.
District Engineer
. Enclosure
cc:
Patricia Morrison - City of Arden Hills
An Equal Opportunity Employer
I r\ \ r'"'...... 0
~Di
. ""'fOOT 211115 13-771 \.... RECEIVED ~
.
. MAR 11 '~bl
STATE OF MINNESOTA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RESIDENT OFFICE
PROVISIONS FOR TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HI~HWAY 55
. TO: -r_ BIIlYonOll . Senior Special Provisions EG,ineer - 715
FRON: K. K. lIe"e , District Enlineer
S.P. No, 6284-111 Proposed Lenin, Dale Bay 8, 1987
Location J-35V fr_ County toad C to CouIIty .....<1 J
Len,th - miles. Type of Work .Joint hhabUlutlOll . Surface I.e_lr
It i. .y recommendation that (traffic be maintained on the road at all times) ~""'I;' .10..
. 4i.H J "...W " Cllcept as provided belo..:
lee attached aheeU.
.
~epe!l!'1 ~t!I\1UJ"'~&JI!' f.M.qp:
~ ~
' .
I Date 3 /1 D /i,7 Siped -z. 4J .h; ~.J_
cc:
load "'orastiOD, G17, Canal Office
. .. .. ..nIow . Diatrict "aiDteDUce Ea.ieeer
M. L. .....Li.-- , Diatrict Traffic Ea,ieHt
Diatriet lD,ie..r'a File
., ...,...11 - I1D
.. "1m - nl .
A. Il>>oUt - 71'
.. .. IoImaoa
J. llber
. Mnlgo.. 211 8-0 11.2.7&1
STATE OF MINNESOTA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. CONTRACT TIME SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS a. MI$:. DATA
!'o. 1Ia1"or_
TO: Senior Special Provisions Engineer _ 715
FROM: II:. 1:. llehe . District DirlCto~
S.P.No. 6214-111 Proposed Letting D.te Ma" eo 1987
,
r LocItion I-3SV fr_ c-ty be. C to CoUIIty load I
Length -- miles Type of Work JoiDt hbabilitatiOD 6 Surfaee lepair
PRINCIPAL QUANTITIES OF WORK
Common Excavation Cu. Yd. Rock bCllV.tion Cu. Yd.
Aggregate Bese Tons Cu. Yd.
Cu. Yd. Muck bcavation
,
~ lit. Mix. !Spec. I Ton ,Bit. Mix. (Spec. I Ton
Bit. Mix. (Spec. I Ton
Concrete Pavement Sq, Yd.
Concrete Const, Cu, Yd.
. The following Time Schedule is recommended for the .bove referenced Project:
Stlrting Date: July 7, 1987 - 10,00 A.M.
Completion: Within -- Working Days _ On or before Anu't 21. 1987
I recommend that liquidated damages be set up on the following basis:
See attacbe' .heet..
Additional Data RllQuired
Public Hearing Status: Held Required Date set if not held
(Public hearing dati must be lUbmittld to the F.H.W.A..t IItISt 6 _ks prior to Iening dat.1
Non<<ICIOlChrnent CIrtHicIta..,t to RNI En.,. OIt.:
. (If tnCI'OIdIlIlInt Diats dDts..mc.tt Itttt when 't will be rtmCMCl71
F'ne! Eftimltt. If mort then 10 cMys 0..,.
R~tional end HiItoricel R~ RlVitMd Ve_Na..-IExplllnl
Concunwnt Work by Other lCurrlnt or "opottcfl
0It1 on Haul RalI Sant
. Other Dett ~t ~"-/?.d ,~
Datt f J It? /"
(Atttch additional dIC IIld ,..'_ ~ . may be ~ct.. vi
..
I.P. 6284-111 (I-35W)
. (1404) IlAIIfrE1WICE or DAPPIC
Traffic ahall be ..intained in accordance vith the provilionl of Ma/DeT
1404, Ma/DeT 1710, and the followinl'
.1 Ixc.pt al otharwile provided for in thale lpecial Provilionl, there ahal1
.. no intarfarance witb traffic .t tbe follovinl ti..1 .nd loc.tionl'
!: .. CD loutbbound I-35W fr~ 6.00 A.M. to ,.00 A.M., Tvelday throulb Friday.
f b. CD loutbbound I-35W fr~ 2.00 P.M. Sunday to ,.00 A.M. Monday.
c. On nortbbound I-35W fr~ 2.30 P.M. to 6,30 P.M., Monday tbroulh Thurlday.
d. On northbound I-35W fr~ 2.30 P.M. Frid.y to 6.00 A.M. Saturday.
.2 The Contractor aay r.ltrict traffic to . linll. lane .t the followinl
timel .nd locationl.
.. On louthbound I-35W fr~ 8.00 P.M. to 5.00 A.M., Monday tbroulh Saturday.
b. CD northbound I-35W from 10.00 P.M. to 7.00 A.M., Saturday through
Thurlday.
.1' .3
At .11 other houri not lilted in 1404.1 and 1404.2 .bove, tbe Contr.ctor
Ib.ll ..intain . .ini.um of two lanel of tr.ffic in .ach direction on
I-35W.
.4 The Department relerves the rilht to lengthen, Ihorten, Dr otherwile modify
these time restrictions or to impole other reltrictions as may be necessary
to lafely provide for traffic. Temporary lane clolures by the Contrsctor,
. during work hours and conliltent with the.e ti.e re.trictions, viiI be
permitted at tho.e location. approved by the Enlineer. Reque.t. to ..ke
temporary lane clo.ur.1 Ihall be made at lealt 24 hour. prior to auch
clolure..
.5 The Contractor Ihall proceed vith hi. con.truction operations 10 as to
msintain traffic in a ..nner and lequence a. Ihown in the Traffic Control
.heetl in the Planl, and aa let forth in thele Special Provi.ion., except
.1 otherwile luthori&ed in vritinl by the Inlineer. The Contractor Ihall
.ubmit to the Inlineer, for approval, layout I li.ilar to the appropriate
Iheetl of the Planl, Ihovinl .ny propoled chanae of traffic maintenance.
The.e layout. Ihall Ihow a complete lequence from the point of chanae
through the completion of the Project.
.6 Belinninl on Tuelday, July 7, 1987, .t 10.00 A.M., the Contractor Ihall
clo.e the riaht and center lanel of louthbound I-35W to traffic from approxi-
aately 2300 f..t louth of County Ro.d I to 1-694 .nd he aay, at the lame
tlM or 1.tar. elol. the rilbt and e.nt.r Ian. I of louthbound X-35W fr~
.ppro.~ta1y 1600 feat 80uth of County load 1-2 to County Ro.d C in th.
. _ar .. lhown Sa tIIa Plal without nl.... to ay tlM raltrletionl of
1404.1, 1404.2, 1404.S, ad 1404.4 .boYa.
~
.
~
------------
,
I.P. 6284-111 (t-35W)
.
Wh.n the Contract Ti.. il apecified a. a fixed calendar co.pletion date,
Iny time exteneionl Iranted ~It be Juetified on the balie of vaavoidable
delay in etartinl or c~letinl the prolreee controllinl operatione, and
then only When and to the extent thlt it ie ahovn thlt delay ti.. could
not be overco.e and the work broulht back on achedule throulh reaeonable
Idjuetment in the Prolreee Ichedule. Provided the Contractor hae ..de
III reaeonable effort. to ..intain In adequate and acceptable Prolr..e
Ichedule, the .pecified completion date ..y be extended Ie the Enaineer
determine. to he Juetified if and only if the delay i. the direct reeult
of a nepartment cauled delay.
.6 Durina the ti.e that the riaht and center lanel of I-35W in either direction
are cloeed to traffic, the Contractor ehall cloee the follovinl rampe
and loope to traffic, ahall complete the required work on thoee rampa
and loope, and .ball reopen thoe. rampa and loopa witbin the time period
indicated,
a. The loop from eouthbound I-35W to County loed I for 3 Workinl naye.
b. The ramp from eouthbound I-35W to County load B for 3 Workina naYI.
c. The ramp from eouthbound 1-35W to ea.tbound T.R. 10 for 4 Workina nay..
d. The ramp from louthbound 1-35W to T.B. 96 for 3 Working naye.
e. The ramp from louthbound 1-35W to westbound 1-694 for 2 Workina Days.
f. The loop from eouthbound 1-35W to County Road n for 3 Working Days.
. I, The ramp from aouthbound 1-35W to County Road C for 3 Workina Daya.
h. The loop to aouthbound I-35W from County Road C for 5 Workina naye,
i. The loop from northbound 1-35W to County load C for 5 Workina naye.
j. THe ramp from northbound 1-35W to County Road n for 3 Working naye.
k. The ramp to northbound 1-35W from weltbound 1-694 for 2 Working neYI.
1. The ramp from northbound 1-35W to T.R. 96 for 4 Working naye.
m. The ramp from northbound 1-35W to weltbound T.B. 10 for 4 Working Days.
n. The ramp to northbound 1-35W from weltbound T.B. 10 for 3 Working Days.
o. The ra.p to northbound I-35W from County load B for 3 Workina naYI.
p. The ramp from northbound 1-35W to County Road I for 3 Workina naye.
q. The loop to northbound 1-35W from County Road I for 3 Working nays.
The lilted Workina Daye are aeparate and independent and may be charaed
concurrently. The above liet ie not intended to be a echedule of operations.
The Contractor ie reminded of the work echedule and the non-concurrent
cloeuree required by (1404) Maintenance of Traffic of theee Special Provieions.
.7 li'dln arl ..,,11.. tIlat 110 work will be penaittecl fr_ Auplt 22, 1917
to ..pt.....r I, 1917. bel..i.,.. AD, work ill ,rOlnl1 lball be c-.letld
l (iaclu.illl concrete carilll), .11 trlffic control device. .ball be ~Id,
..cl .11 lallle .bal1 .. opelll' to aerl.trictlcl ..1 ~, trlffic prior to
Aiip.t 22, 1917.
.1 !he bliDler will ban tbl euthority to .u.pen' ., opention. tbat ..y,
III 1111 opiDion, .....It t.a tbe f.Uurl of tbe Contrlctor to _at tbe ,rovillone
. .f 1106.7.
,
. ~ ...",. -, ~ - ~...- -...-, i" ' .-.. "'- ,'.~ e. ....
B.P. 6214-111 (1-35V)
.
\,...//.7 The Contractor .hall clo.e the followinl .cce.aea to .outhbound I-35W
to tr.ffic .a the clo.ure Oft .outhbound I-35W pa..ea tb.t .cc....
.. Th. loop fro. County lo.d I.
J b. The r.ap fro. ..atbound T.B. 10.
e. The ra..p fro. T.I. 96
d. The ramp fro. County lo.d 1-2
.. The rap fro. County lo.d D.
Theae .cceaaea ah.l1 r....in cloaed until the lonl tera cloaurea on .outhbound
I-35W .re removed or until ordered open by the Inlineer, whichever ia
'ooner.
.8 Beginninl Oft . d.te, .. .pproved by the Ingin.er, .fter 7.00 P.X. July 7,
1987, the Contr.ctor .h.ll cloae the rilht and center l.ne. of northbound
" I-35W to tr.ffic fro. County lo.d C to .pprozi..tely 4500 feet north of
northbound T.I. 88 .nd he "y, .t the .... ti~ or l.ter, cloa. the rilht
.nd center l.nea of northbound I-35w from 1-694 to approximately 2200
feet north of County load I in the ..nner .a ahewn in the Plana without
regard to any ti..e reatrictions of 1404.1, 1404.2, 1404.3, and 1404.4
above.
.9 The Contractor ahall close the following accesles to northbound 1-35W
. to traffic as the cloaures on northbound 1-35W Pa.ael that acceaal
a. The ra..p fro. County load C.
b. The ra.p from County load D.
c. The ra..p from County load 1-2.
d. The ramp from T.I. 96.
Thele accellel ahall remain cloled until the long term clolurel on northbound
1-35W are removed or until ordered open by the Engineer, whichever is
'ooner.
,10 The Contractor ahall ..intain two lane. of traffic on aouthbound 1-35W
from 1-694 to .pproxiaately 1600 feet .outh of County load 1-2 and one
lane of traffic on northbound I-35W from approzimately 4500 feet north
of northbound T.I. II to 1-694, all in the ..nner .a ahown in the Pl.nl.
.11 Wh.n the work in the rilht .nd c.nter 1.n.a of I-35W in either direction,
north or .outh of 1-694, h.a h..n eo.p1et.d to the ..ti.f.ctioa of the
lnain..r, the Contr.ctor ,h.11 opea the riabt lane to tr.ffic and c10..
t t'" l.ft lane, .U is the .._r .. .hOWD in tile '1....
.12 !he Contr.ctor .., clo.. oth.r .cc..... to an. fro. I-35V that .re Bot
u.t.. in 1404.7 and 1404.9 .bove oal, for the ..ded of t1M ..c....ry
to co.pl.t. the r.~lr.. work on th... .ce...... Ie .., .ak. the.. clo.ur..
oal, When't'" rllht and c.nt.r lan.a .f I-35V .r. clo... to tr.ffic .t
t'" ace... locatlon. 'nI. COlItr.ctor .h.n nllalt to the IaataHr fOr
. ."rO'fal, . ,...,.... .c....ul. of oper.U... for c..,l.UIlI the work oa
the.. .Cc..... III . tt.el, aaBD.r that will ".p .1t.rDlt. rout.., a.
...lanat.d ., t'" laaln.ar, open to tr.fflc ... c.u.. . 81nl..- di.ruptloa
.f trafflc.
,
I.P. 6284-111 (I-35V)
.
.13 The CoDtractor .hall not clo.e the followiDI .et. of acce..e. concurreDtly.
a. The loop froa DorthboUlld I-3SV to County load C and the r.-p froa north-
bound I-3SW to County load D.
b. '!'he raap fr_ Dorthbound I-3SW to T... 96 aDd tbe raap from northbouDd
I-3SW to va.tbound T... 10.
c. The raap to northbound I-3SW from ...tbowd T... 10 and the raap to
northbound I-3SW froe County load ..
d. '!'he ra.p from northbound I-35W to CoUtlty load I and the loop from
.outhbound I-3SW to County load 1.
... '!'he ra.p frOll .outhbound Y-3SW to County lo.d B and the ramp from
aouthbound I-35W to .a.tbound T... 10.
\:: f. '!'he r.-p froa .outbbound I-3SW to ea.tbolDld T... 10 and tbe r.-p
froe .outbbound I-3SW to T... 96.
I. '!'he raap from .outbbound I-3SW to T .B. 96 and tbe ramp from
.outhbound I-35W to ...tbound 1-694.
h. The ramp from .outhbound 1-35W to weltbound 1-694 and the ramp
to northbound 1-35W from weltbound 1-694.
. i. The loop from louthbound 1-35W to County Road D and the ramp from
aouthbound 1-35~ to County Road C.
.14 '!'he Contractor .hall reque.t perai.aion to aake a chanle of traffic pattern,
a. .hOWD in tbe Plana or othervi.e approved, at lealt ten (10) daya prior
to the tentative date and 48 hour. prior to the exact date of auch cbanle.
.15 '!'he Contractor .hall furni.h for uae in the lane clolure, one Electric
Flaahinl Arrow Board for each lane cloaed at each location the Contractor
.ake. a temporary lane clo.ure in accordance with tbe proviaiona of 1404.1,
1404.2, 1404.3, and 1404.4 above.
.16 The Contractor .hall provide .uch protective devices as may be nece.sary
to protect traffic and pedestrians from drop-off., f.lling in holes, falling
objectl, aplatter. or other bazard. which aay exi.t durinl construction
operationa.
.17 On any road open to traffic. ..terial.. equi~nt. and other object. a.
dete~ined by tbe lalin..r. aball Dot be .tored vitbin tb. cl.ar .one.
.. "t.~iD" .,. tM Ia,iner ad .. ..fin.d .y AAlBTO'. 1977 "Guid. ror
"lecUn, toc.U.... .d helpilll traffic Inri.n", .1... ...quately
trot.ct.d .y . tr.ffic barri.r.
.11 !be Contr.ctor .bal1 ,roYide parkinl for bi. .-ploy.... ..bicl.. out.ide
tba It.it. .f tbi. ProJ.ct. ..c.,t .. otb.tvi.. .utbori..d .y tb. In,in..r.
.
.
,
S.P. 6284-111 (I-3Sv)
.
(563) ftAJ'PIC COIn'IOL
fbi. work .h.ll eon.i.t of furni.hinl, in.t.llinl. ..int.ininl. and re.ovinB
th. tr.ffie eontrol d.vie.. r.quir.d to ..f.l, provide for tr.ffie ..
r.quir.d b, th... Speei.l Provi.ion. .nd .. .hoWD in the Tr.ffie Control
.h..t. of the Pl.n..
Kainten.ne. of tr.ffie eontrol d.vie.. .h.ll b. eontinuou. throulhout
the t.re of the Contr.et, 1neludinB period. of .u.pen.ion. fbe Contr.etor
will be required to r..pond to an, e.ll fro. the Dep.rt.ent for ..inten.nee
of tr.ffie eontrol deviee. within two hour. froa the tial of notifie.tion.
The Contr.etor .h.ll provide . ...n. of reeeivinB e.ll. for ..inten.nee
on . 24 hour. d., b..i. throUBhout the t.ra of the Contr.et.
All .ilft. .h.ll eon fore to the St.nd.rd Sign. Manu. 1 or .. .hoWD in the
Pl.DI. All b.rrie.de. .h.ll eonfora to St.nd.rd Pl.te 80001. All other
deviee. .h.ll eODfora to the Minne.ot. Manu. 1 on Unifora Tr.ffie Control
Daviee., .xe.pt .. othervi.e det.iled 1n the Pl.n..
Ro .e..ure.ent will be ..de of the individu.l items required for tr.ffie
eontrol.
P.yment for Tr.ffic Control .hall be by Lump Sum.
. All tr.ffie eontrol devices required for tempor.ry l.ne closures, conBistent
with the first four p.r'lr.ph. of (1404) Mainten.nee of Tr.ffic of the.e
Speci.l Provi.ton., .h.ll be provided .nd ..int.ined by the Contr.ctor
.t hi. expen.e in .ccord.nce with Hn/DOT 1710 Tr.ffic Control Device..
If, .t .ny time, the Contr.ctor fail. to properly furnish, in.tall, maintain,
or remove .ny of the required tr.ffic control deviceB, the Department
re.erves the riBht to properly eomplete the work .nd deduct the co.ts
thereof from .ny moni.. due or co.inB due to the Contr.ctor.
(lSOS) COOnRATIOIl BY COImtACTORS
The City of Ro.eville h.. let. bridge con.truction contract .t County
Ro.d B-2, .dj.cent to the .outherl, limit. of this Project, th.t i. currently
in progre...
Th. Contr.etor .h.ll coordin.t. bit oper.tion. with .nd eooper.te with
the bold.r. .f that ..par.t. Contr.ct, a. veIl.. .11 oth.r 'I.nci.. per-
fo~DI DODcurreat ...ratiOD' on thi. Proj.ct, in . .aDD.r cOD.i.t.nt
. wit" t", proYhioa. .f lID/DOT 1505.
,
.
..
B.P. 6284-111 (13SV)
.
(1SlS) UBTl.ICTIOllS ClIII10VEMEIft OP DAn LCWlIl BD IQUlPMDr
The proviaiona of Mn/DOT 1513 are hereby aupple.ented with the fol1ovins.
.1 Vellht Infonution Card Bpecial Infonution
~ The Contractor ahall require all trucka uaed for bauling bituminous .ixture,
". asgngate, batched concrete and lradins ..tedal (includina borrow and
exce..) to have a Vellht Information Card containins the tare velSht and
..d....1Il allowable Iro.. welaht b..ed on the nUlllber of adu, ade apacing
and tire width.. Thi. card .hall be in the vahicle at all time. and aball
be ..de available to the Ingineer upon reque.t.
Said WeiSht Information Card ahall identify the truck or tractor and trailer
by licen.e number, aerial number or other acceptable identification approved
by the Insineer and .ball include the .illlature of the owner.
..
Ro truck vill be allowed to perform lIOrk on the Project until the above
requirementa are fulfilled.
(1806) DETEltHlRATlOll .un UTDSIOR 0' CONTRACT TDlE
The Contract Time will be determined in accordance with the provision.
of MII/DOT 1806 and the following:
. .1 Con.truction op.ration. .hall be started at 10:00 A.M. on July 7~_ 19!'.
.2 lecau.e of the .evere ispact of this Proj.ct on the traveHng public,
every effort .u.t b. ..de by the Contractor to minimize the disruption
to traffic. Since the public'. perception of project effici.ncy is b..ed
on the amount of work ectivity ob..rv.d in a given n.a, the Contractor
ahall .ch.dule hh work in a mann.r that will provide a ma"i= of work
effort in a. ahort a work ana .. practical. Lan. clo.ure. will not b.
- placed or ext.nd.d into area. where work will not be actively puraued..
.3 The provi.ion. of Mn/DOT 1806.1C(1) and 1806.lC(3)(b) .re herewith delet.d.
Working Day chnges will be .......d .ix (6) days per w.ek, excluding
Sunday., and .ixteen (16) hour. per day.
.4 The provilions of Mn/DOT l806.lB are herewith del.ted. Th. only delays
for which the Deparr.ent viII not char Ie tiae are bepartaent cau.ad delay..
.5 ... aU. or a fOI'UOIl, af the Contract !1M b .,ecified aa . nnll
'j' calendar .-pIaU.. 'at., a. provided for in 1Ia!1lOT 1103, the ttae b
pra._1I to lIa.. ....11 ..tarained 'y cOIlaidarill1 th. Propo.al lIUantiU..,
aoraal ..ather for tile 10caUty nd ....on of the year, AJnl !II ..ClSnTY
. IAVIIG ftl1lOU CCllPLlTlD It !II .nCIrIlD DATI,
'.
..
~ . .
, j.
, .
411 . i ·
I' I 1 ,r ~
I " I ~
I ~ . .! Ii
R "1- lit Ii
. U
I If ' II!:
z . I. J. ' I
Q "_ ~ Ii =i I J i
Iii J!' . ~ 1" "'.. I I I
~ ~ . . &.1
a.. !I_ . ~ J.!: " 0
. 0 I~: ·
::!; ~'~ . !J H I =, 1
o ~' · .". 1.1 i
(,) ., R III :.. 15 ~ :::i .,
a:".' " " "
" , " ' . "
filo."il' ! ! I~~" ! II i
;]!I'd. ~ &1,1 ~ 4: 1
c "" . " 0' ·
.. !o c ' ..
I--...!. Ii
. ~ w
o ' 1
l:i i'" d' 2 ~ '
<( ! I.'
".0 I l.oe
~ . ..,
z So' I'
8 : : III ~ =
\I
~:i f
~ .. .
, : I . : c ' "
- -.......
!i J ~ ~
. ~ .t "
! =~
~ I
~! Jld,
~ oJ I: 1==
t H II 1 ,"
..
~I~
. ' .
.
. I.P. 6284-111 (I-3SW)
.t If the CoDtr.ctor f.ll. to coaply vlth the provl.lon. of 1806.7, the It.te
wlll ,.rfo~ the DeC....ry work wlth It. ..lllt.D.ace forcea to .ccoapll.h
the r.qulreaent. ther.of, .ad the entlr. coat of thla work by the St.te
;.! wlll be d.duct.d froe .ny aonl.. due or CoalD, du. to the CoDtr.ctor.
.10 All work r.qulr.d uader thl. Contr.ct, .xcept ..latea.nce work .nd fla.l
cle.nup, .h.ll be coapleted on or before Auau.t 21, 1987.
DCnTIn PAnmJIT
.1 In tbe event tb.t .11 work, .xc.pt ..lnten.nce .nd fln.l cle.nup, tb.t
lnterfer.. vltb tr.ffic on .outbbound I-35V i. coapleted in .dv.nce of
the .pecifi.d Coapletlon D.t. of Auau.t 21, 1987, an incentlve p.,ment
I will be ..de to the CoDtr.ctor .qu.l to f5,ooo for ..ch full C.lend.r
D.y the work 11 coaplet.d prior to 12,00 IIidD1.ht on Auau.t 21. 1987.
.2 In the event tb.t .11 work, except ..inten.nce .nd fln.l cle.nup, th.t
lnterfere. wlth tr.ffic on northbound I-35W i. completed in .dvance of
the apecified Completion Date of Auguat 21, 1987, .n incentive payment
will be .ade to the Contractor equal to $5,000 for each full Calendar Day
the work is completed prior to 12:00 midnight on Auguat 21, 1987.
. .3 Theae lncentive payment. .re aeparate .nd independent .nd may be credited
concurrently.
.4 Payment of the lncentive Or deduction of the liquidated d.mage., Whichever
.pplies, viII be ..de on the fir.t parti.l eatimate voucher procea.ed
.fter the Engineer determine. which applie..
(1807) rAlwu 10 CDIPLITZ !B! won 011 'UIII
In lieu of the charge. apecified in Ma/DO! 1807 for f.ilure to complete
.11 the work on tiae, the Departaent will deduct from .ny aonie. due or
coming due to the Contr.ctor .n .mount equal to the following:
.1 f1500 for ..ch Calend.r Day the work, .a .pecified in 1806,6 of theae
Special Provl.lon., for ..ch r.mp or loop remain. uncompleted .fter the
a,.ciUed tiM. the ch.r... for ..ch r.., or loop .re aepar.te and tnde-
,.adeat aDd .., .. cbar..' coacurreatl,.
I .J tl0.000 for .acll Ca1ndar la, the work a,.clfted lD 1106.10 r...tlla __
c-.p1.tl' aftlr t" a,.cifia' tiM.
JJOU) nm.D IIWICI AD u-oti'nllt.
the proYlatoaa of ID/DOT 1031 are h.reb, auppl...at.' with the follovia.I
. !be CoDtractor .ball lUraiah an' ..iataia a t.l.phon. aDd loc.l ,rl..t.
t.l...... ..rri..at the 'i. 1. Offi.. .t .11 t1Ma.
fta ~ work aba11 .. iactu'.' ill the CoDtract Ii. Prtce for It.. 1031.501
'i.l. Offi.. !)pi ..
.
, , . "- CcJlUvG~
. .
1-/13/9:7
.
April 3, 1987
Mr. Kermit K. McRae, P.E.
District Engineer
Mn(DOT, District 9
3485 Hadley Avenue N.
Box 9050
North st. Paul, MN 55109
SUBJECT: S.P. 6284-111 (T.H. 35W) Concrete Pavement Repair and
Guardrail Revisions from County Road "ell in Roseville
to County Road "I" in Arden Hills
Dear Mr. McRae:
We appreciated receiving preliminary construction plans for the
above referenced project. We have reviewed the plans and have
some questions.
. The proposed reconstruction will obviously create significant
traffic delays and congestion on the freeway which will in turn
place significant additional demands on adjacent roadways
including city streets. This diversion of traffic will create
some obvious delays for Arden Hills residents and will subject
some of them to additional traffic.
We recognize that the work must be done and that the delays are
inevitable. The city would like to have additional information
relative to the estimated time of construction, for each of the
stages, as \-lell as the restrictions that will be placed upon the
contractor's activities. We are interested in the hours that the
contractor will be permitted to work and any incentives which
might be offered to shorten the time of construction.
Would you kindly contact our consulting engineers, Short-Elliott-
Hendrickson, when the information is available.
Sincerely,
Patricia Morrison
City Administrator
. jms
cc: Short-Elliott-Hendrickson
- - -
.r .
. ,
. .
.
)~)~ tJ-
Q9JV~ url~
./1jL~
.
.
,I""
1
May I, 19~
Village of Arden Hills
. Calendar for 198~Budget
~(j
May;W- Budget worksheets distributed to department
I 7. heads and committee chairmen.
May 30 - July i!' Department heads and committees prepare
budget requests. Finance Committee liaison
17 will attend department budget meetings.
July .u Deadline for submitting budget requests to
j{ Clerk Administrator.
Augus t ~ Clerk Administrator distributes preliminary
ID '2 budget and tax levy to Council.
September ~ I Finance Committee reviews proposed budget.
September ~ Finance Committee presents recommendations at
joint meeting of Council, department heads
September .% and committee chairmen.
Council approves budget and tax levy.
October' r If budget not approved on September 'it. hold
. Special Council meeting.
l Deadline for submission of levy to County
October 1-0 12.. .
Department of Property Taxation.
.